ADMINISTRATIVE

2001 EHS Performance Targets - EHS Global Asset Operations has been working
with the regions to develop EHS performance targets.  Targets will presented
to Regional Senior Management next week.

Constellation Energy EHS Benchmarking - The EHS group in response to a
request met with Constellation Energy representatives and described Enron's
EHS management system in a four hour session in Houston.

EHS Enron Corp. Website - The website was activated at the end of Dec. 2000.
Since then approximately 400 users have visited the site registering
approximately 39,000 inquiries.  Visitors are internal as well as external.

Conservation Committee - The Enron Conservation Committee met on Jan. 24 to
begin their activities for 2001.  An aggressive work plan was agreed on.
Increased corporate visibility strategy was established.

EUROPE, INDIA and ASIA

EHS Conservation Survey  - Bal Wong and Alan Stringer working with facilities
to complete the conservation survey.  This survey will gather information
about energy usage and waste management practices at their facilities.   The
information will be used to develop energy and material conservation
initiatives.

UK, Severnside Project ) Alan Stringer supported UK Engineering team in
assessing whether any guidelines exist for distance for development from
underground cables.

Spain, Arcos Project ) Alan Stringer supported Enron Spain in gathering
information on air impacts on vineyards.

Asia, 2001 EHS Support Plan  ) Alan Stringer and Bal Wong prepared the 2001
EHS Support Plan.  The plan will be submitted to Asia Region Senior Mgmt.

Guam, Marianas Energy Co.  - Bal Wong provided orientation about the spill
plan (SPCC) to the  Operations Department and completed the plant weekly
inspection.  Also assisted in a fire drill, which include respiratory
protection training.

CALME

Panama, Bahia Las Minas Power Plant (BLM) - Donnie Willmann, Gus Eghneim,
Bill Curra, and Ramiro Garcia completed a fatal flaw analysis for a potential
expansion project in Panama involving the addition of 3 internal combustion
engines at BLM.  Preliminary results indicated that actual emissions
monitoring should be conducted to confirm ambient air quality (estimated
emission factors used show the proposed project would not meet SO2 ambient
air quality standards.  BLM agree to conduct the emissions monitoring in
February.

SOUTH AMERICA

Brazil, Cuiaba - Edgar Zuleta completed the implementation of the emergency
action plan for Bolivia Cuiaba Pipeline.

OEC / NORTH AMERICA

Quebec, Canada, Daishowa Paper Manufacturing Co. - Scott Watson participated
in the Enron Corp. EHS Overview presentation  to Eric Conner (Enron North
America).

Mobile Energy Services Company - Scott Watson provided presentation material
requested by Sappi regarding 1). Safety Statistics for existing managed OEC
facilities and 2). OEC,s Safety Vision and Safety/Health Program.  This is
part of the  transition process.  OEC to operate this paper mill on April
1st, 2001.

Enron North America, Crisis Management Plan - Scott Watson prepared a Crisis
Management Plan Template for Enron (ENA) attorney Peter del Vecchio.

New Jersey, Garden State Paper Company - Scott Watson contacted Marty Blick
(Acting General Manager) on 1/23/01 to discuss Enron,s Corporate EHS
Services.  Scott Watson scheduled to conduct an EHS Audit during the 1st
Quarter of  2001 at this facility.

EES - Power Distribution Project - Gus Eghneim is supporting the
environmental permitting activities for several western power distribution
projects. The work includes developing permitting scenarios for several
states and for various types of applications.

ENA, Cleburne Cogeneration Plant - Gus Eghneim is reviewing a draft Title V
permit issued by the TNRCC.  Comments will be submitted to the State and the
facility by January 29, 2001.

Enron Transportation Services, Cunningham Compressor Station - Gus Eghneim is
reviewing a PSD permit application developed for Cunningham compressor
station to allow for 100% natural gas firing.

GREENFIELD CAPITAL PROJECTS

UPDATES APPEAR IN BOLD BELOW:

RioGen/Eletrobolt PPs (Brazil)- Joe Kolb reports that permitting continues to
proceed quickly.  A public meeting for the area where the pipeline will be
constructed will occur shortly.  There are still issues with Petrobras and
CEG to work out.  It could be that the pipeline will not be constructed as
quickly as needed.

Metgas Pipeline (India) - Susan Worthen confirmed with Lauren Iannarone that
the Metgas Pipeline has been cancelled due to the lack of customers and most
development team members have been redeployed.

E Power Corp, Japan Power Plant - Joe Kolb met with Brian Stanley last week
to discuss the potential power plant project(s) in Japan.  Brian confirmed
that there are three power plants at three separate locations being
considered (rather than one power plant at three possible locations) and that
each site is at a current industrial/port location.  Joe will coordinate his
review and monitoring of the projects with Alan Stringer (EHS Europe).
Preliminary indications are that it will take up to 7 years to obtain all of
the environmental permits.

Isle of Grain Power Plant (England) ) Joe Kolb completed his review of the
nontechnical summary of the 1998 environmental impact assessment.  The
proposed power plant would be located within an industrial complex, which is
good from an environmental standpoint.  It appears that the environmental
review is being done well.

Project Quail/Tex Mex/Salsa - Joe Kolb reports that this project (known under
various names) involves a 6-mile power line for transporting electricity to
Mexico from the Brownsville, Texas area.  Joe spoke with Dave Kellermeyer
(ENA) and received a project overview.  Joe asked Dave to be particularly
attentive to issues associated with bird collisions with the proposed power
lines.  Dave sent a copy of a letter from the US Fish and Wildlife Service
that expressed similar concerns.

ACQUISITIONS

Project Crane (Quebec, Canada and Port Angeles, Washington Pulp and Paper
Acquisition) - Don Stevens has been informed that Eric Connor (Director,
Enron Industrial Markets) will be managing the transition for EIM.  Eric met
with members of the corporate EHS and Responsibility staff to review our
services.  He will have follow-up meetings directly with Gus Eghneim and
Scott Watson regarding the transition and operations support.  Eric also
expressed an interest in the EHS's assistance in a potential tissue factory
being considered by EIM and will contact Susan Worthen for follow-up.

Military Base Privatization (Maxwell AFB) - RAC Underwriting contacted Susan
Worthen regarding the DASH for Maxwell AFB.  Don Stevens provided follow-up
with the RAC group.

CWT Thermo-Depolymerization (EES New Technology) - Don Stevens submitted the
Environmental Issues Matrix to Bruce Stram, Gene O'Gorman and Susan Worthen.

North Carolina CF Power Plants - Don Stevens reports that ENSR has completed
the monitoring well installations and groundwater/soil sampling at Lumberton
and Elizabethtown.  Analytical results should be available early to mid next
week.

DEPARTMENT PROJECTS
Annual Report - Susan Worthen has received EHS performance data from GAO
Europe and Asia and EES.  ETS and the remaining assets in GAO are expected to
submit data by the end of the month.  Susan discussed possible storylines and
data inputs with Community Relations.  Lauren Iannarone is leading the
coordination with Diversity.  Susan is awaiting the image template
information (from the 10K report) from Dennis Vegas to determine if the basic
concept can be used fro the Corporate Responsibility report.

BMPs -  Susan Worthen discussed with Shell International the prospect of
performing a "peer review" of the Pipeline Construction BMPs.  Joe Kolb will
follow-up with the Shell contacts.  Susan will also extend an invitation to
Conservation International for a similar review.  In addition, there is a
potential to discuss or revise the BMPs over the next year in coordination
with the Biodiversity Forum (see below for discussion).

EHS Web Site - Russ Tucker is providing more ergonomics information that will
be placed on the website. Scott Watson is providing two health and safety
training videos for the web site. These videos are intended to be viewed by
new hires. Gavin Dillingham is persuading Enron Networks of the importance of
having these videos on-line and is pressing for Enron Networks to quickly
finalize a contract with a video streaming vendor.

Telework/NEPI Program - Gavin Dillingham and Catherine Querioga, HR, will be
attending a conference on the morning of January 31st, to gather more
information on telecommuting. After this conference, a meeting will be set-up
with NEPI to push this program along. There has been a positive response from
Work Perks to possibly help pilot this program.

Hybrid Vehicle Program - Gavin Dillingham and a group from HR and the Fleet
Vehicle group will be meeting with Toyota on Monday to finalize discussions
on the discounts that Toyota can provide for Enron employees on the Toyota
Prius. Also, Gavin Dillingham will meet with Bruce Martin and Colleen Raker
of Enron Strategic Sourcing and Lilly Wells with HGAC on Tuesday, January
31st, to discuss further how Enron can implement hybrids into its fleet.

Asset Tracking Database - The database is currently being populated with
data. Susan Worthen will discuss the prospect of a larger EHS audience using
the database to update business unit project information at the next EHS
Direct/Indirect Staff Meeting.

GAO EHS Tracking Database ) Gavin Dillingham is taking on the responsibility
of streamlining this database and improving its workability and capabilities.
b
Biodiversity Forum - Susan Worthen and Catherine McKalip-Thompson attended
the 2nd meeting of the Biodiversity Forum in London last week.  This is a
forum representing 5 NGOs and 5 multinational energy companies.  Enron will
host the next meeting, which has been scheduled for April 19 & 20.  Susan is
co-chairing a work group to draft a paper on the business value of
biodiversity/conservation. This activity allows Enron to develop a positive
response to shareholder proxy requests.

Corporate Responsibility Sub-Committee Meetings - Susan Worthen participated
in several sub-committee meetings in support of the Corporate Responsibility
Task Force.  Mike Terraso was elected to chair the Internal Communications
sub-committee.

Green Sourcing Initiatives - Susan Worthen provided a summary of
GreenOrder.com's capabilities and possible business upsides (for Enron) to
Eric Melvin (EES) and Darryl Cleveland (Global Strategic Sourcing).  A
follow-up meeting with Global Strategic Sourcing will be scheduled to discuss
supplier considerations and possibly setting green sourcing/purchasing
targets.  This meeting will be coordinated with Henry Van as the chairperson
of the Conservation Committee.

EHS Guidelines Revision - The EHS Council sub-committee will meet 02/08/01 to
discuss and agree on the preferred method of revising the EHS Guidelines, as
well as the selection of consultants to submit proposals.

VOLUNTEER ACTIVITIES/COMMUNITY RELATIONS

MOPS 686 Donation - Joe Kolb reports that the Texas A&M meeting on January 12
to review Enron's proposal went well.  The university is pursuing additional
funding sources and participants with the goal of developing a 5-year funding
program.  They expect it will be about the end of March before they report
their results to Enron.

Enron Earth Day Festival - Gavin Dillingham and Charla Reese met with Trash
Bash on Tuesday, the 23rd, to discuss the logistics of leveraging Trash Bash
with the Buffalo Bayou Challenge. Trash Bash provided great information
concerning supplies and how to efficiently and effectively pick-up the trash.
Charla Reese, Gavin Dillingham and Joe Kolb are meeting today to finalize
some of the aspects of this challenge.

REGULATORY TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Methanol Plant Emission Credits - Marc Phillips provided an evaluation of the
potential value of emission credits for the Enron methanol plant to their
management.

Louisiana Title V Permit Renewals - Marc Phillips provided information from
LMOGA about Title V permit renewals in Louisiana to the appropriate ETS
personnel. Applications for renewal of the permits are required 6 months
prior to expiration, but the state agency is apparently not notifying
companies about this deadline.

Reciprocating Engine Control Technology - Marc Phillips provided ETS
personnel with industry studies about control technology that has been
applied to reciprocating engines, and data that SCR was not an effective
control technology for load-following engines. An ETS station in Kansas could
be subject to PSD regulations and the agency may require SCR technology.

National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Report Issued -  the NAS  study released
1/17/01 justified the need for an ergonomics standard. The report indicates
that MSDs show evidence of being caused by workplace exposures and that
interventions can reduce those exposures and injuries. The importance of this
study is in its being funded by Congress, which now is faced with the
decision to activate the never before used Congressional Review Act in an
effort to send to the President a resolution that would retract the recently
effective OSHA Ergonomics Program final rule.

Three New OSHA Final Rules - Russell Tucker is reviewing 3 new OSHA final
rules issued in the last week. They are the amendments to the Bloodborne
Pathogen standard, amendments to the Employee Injury Recordkeeping rule, and
a completely new Steel Erection standard, all of which are extensive in their
content and importance in their impact on all Enron companies under OSHA
enforcement, except for the Steel Erection standard, which applies to the ECC
and NEPCO operations.

Enron Houston Work Related Injury/Illness/Accident Reporting, Investigation
and Record Keeping Protocol - Russell Tucker is making final revisions to
this protocol for use within the Houston office complex with publication to
the Enron Corp EH&S Intranet scheduled for this week. Revisions reflect
reviews and input from Wellness, Fair Employment, Legal, and Risk Management.

Environmental Strategies Group

Competitive Intelligence

Power/Gas/Emissions Markets -- California Energy Crisis & Emissions
Regulation:  ESG has given high priority to assisting Enron business units in
developing a strategy related to the impact of environmental regulation on
California's energy crisis.  Jeff Keeler provided ENA traders and competitive
analysis groups with information regarding potential federal actions and Bush
administration political pressure for California to ease emissions
requirements on generators.   Jeff also coordinated with Mark Palmer and the
EGM emissions desk in talking to reporters about environmental regulation's
role in the California situation. Mary Schoen will be focusing on California
in the coming weeks, helping to provide intelligence about state/local
actions to change environmental/emissions regulations and leading efforts to
develop innovative solutions to acquiring offsets for new generation
development.  Stacey Bolton's work on renewable energy issues will help Enron
businesses in looking at additional opportunities to provide capacity to
California.  The entire ESG will act as a resource for federal and state
government affairs as they offer policy solutions to the crisis.

Coal/Power Markets - RCRA Coal Ash decision:  On Friday, January 19, a
Federal Court dismissed a lawsuit by environmental groups against EPA's 2000
determination that classified most types of fossil fuel waste as
"non-hazardous" under the RCRA hazardous waste laws.   A decision against EPA
and industry could have imposed greater disposal costs on generators, having
significant impacts on power and coal prices and limiting generators ability
to sell ash for positive uses, such as cement making.   Jeff Keeler advised
EGM coal, ENA power, and PGE of the decision.

Power Markets -- Environmental Disclosure:   Stacey Bolton updated EES on the
New York PSC's progress on developing environmental disclosure regulations
and what Enron's requirements will be.  Stacey also provided the Texas group
information on the proposed label calculation rule and voluntary certificates
market.

Advocacy Coordination and Business Support

Clean Air Act -- Federal Multi-pollutant Legislation:   Jeff Keeler continued
development of strategy on a multi-pollutant cap and trade proposal for
submission to Congress and the new Administration.   Jeff participated in
several industry strategy calls and organized visits of an ad hoc "Clean
Power" group to key staff on Capitol Hill and in EPA.  Jeff interviewed
several law firms and consultants that the group may retain to assist with
technical legislative drafting and lobbying on the multi-pollutant bill.

Climate Change:  Stacey Bolton represented Enron at a Pew Center on Climate
Change seminar in Portland, OR, speaking on Enron's renewable energy
products, regulatory hurdles in the retail renewable market, and the benefits
of renewable energy credit trading.  Stacey made several contacts with
potential customers (Weyerhaeuser & Toyota - manufacturing) that she has
passed along to Enron businesses. Mike Terraso presented Enron's Greenhouse
Gas Inventory methodology.  Jeff Keeler assisted Enron Europe and Government
Affairs in developing final comments to submit to the UK government regarding
their proposed greenhouse gas emissions trading pilot program.  Jeff also
answered inquiries from ENA power developers who are interested in
potentially selling carbon offsets through the purchase additional
land/forest resources along with power projects.

Power Quality:   The entire ESG continues to provide a great deal of support
to the EES Premium Power group as they develop and implement their business
plan to provide power quality and distributed generation services to
customers in the high-tech area.  Mary Schoen worked on evolving
environmental regulations regarding distributed generation in California and
Texas.   Stacey Bolton provided support on renewable energy technologies and
incentive monies.  Jeff Keeler coordinated meetings with the US DOE, who is
interested in lending support to Enron projects.   Enron is helping the DOE
staff and Bush transition team develop a FY 02 multi-million dollar funding
mechanism at DOE to support R&D and commercial applications for power quality
projects in the high-tech sector.  In addition, DOE has committed some
immediate discretionary funding to existing Enron projects.  Mary Schoen
organized meetings for EES on environmental regulation and the relation to
various power technologies.

Pipeline Safety Legislation & Regulation:  Jeff Keeler held meetings in
Washington, DC to provide ETS and Federal Government Affairs with information
on activities in the 106th Congress and assist in developing a strategy in
the 107th Congress.   Jeff organized meetings with policy makers and industry
organizations to ensure Federal Government Affairs' smooth transition into
assuming a leadership role on this issue.

Renewable Energy - California Customer Credit:   Stacey Bolton provided
testimony to California Energy Commission (CEC) regarding the current
customer credit fund for larger users being prematurely depleted, and ways in
which the commission can ensure this doesn't happen with the future
allocation from 2002-2007.  Stacey also submitted formal comments to CEC on
the allocation of the extended SBF program.

Renewable Energy Credit Trading:  Stacey Bolton talked to New York PSC staff
regarding their quasi-trading program (conversion transaction) for renewable
energy.  Enron submitted joint comments last summer, and NYPSC staff
confirmed that many of our recommendations will be incorporated into the
final rule, to be released at the end of the month.  Stacey informed EES of
this win.   Stacey is also working with Texas renewable coalition to fight
hefty charges for the REC program.  Charges could act as a disincentive to
renewable generators thinking about building projects & raise the price of
retail products in TX.

Renewable Energy Trading/Products:  Mike Terraso and Stacey Bolton met with
Elliot Mainzer of ENA West structuring for a strategy session regarding his
development of a wholesale renewable energy desk.  Stacey is assisting Elliot
with information for inclusion in his business plan.  Stacey also met with
Elliot and EES to discuss arrangement between an ENA/EMPI renewable wholesale
desk and EES.

Environmental Disclosure:   Stacey Bolton is working with a law firm in
Maryland to submit reply comments arguing against the Commissions' intent to
go with a PJM tracking system for disclosure.  Stacey is coordinating a joint
response with several stakeholders (PG&E national energy group, Green
Mountain, and possibly some utilities/affiliates).

2001 Strategies for Business Support:   ESG met with EES' Heather Mitchell
and Elizabeth Howley to discuss their 2001 objectives and how we can assist
them over the next year.  They are interested in promoting the role of energy
efficiency in reducing emissions and monetizing the benefits that they help
customers accrue.  They are also interested in assistance with renewable
energy strategies and EPA Star programs.  Stacey Bolton also participated in
the EHS meeting with Enron Industrial Markets to inform him of our group's
capabilities, and followed up with an e-mail.

Presidential Inauguration:   Environmental Strategies participated in several
inauguration activities.  In addition to participating in the Enron events,
ESG sponsored the "Environmental Inaugural Ball" which was a smaller event
with participation by companies, organizations, and policy makers in the
environmental area.


Michelle Cash asked me to forward this script to you.  I will be in touch
with Janette to schedule the most convenient time for filming on Tuesday or
Wednesday, April 9 or 10.  Thanks.

Script

Quarterly Mandatory Office Move Policy
Location:  The Construction Site

Props:  Substitute Building Guy in Building Guy Attire (Hard Hat, tool belt),
Mark Haedicke with Hard Hat and Blazer

Script

ENA Lawyer in an Obsequious Voice:  Hey, Substitute Building Guy, I,m with
ENA Legal and I,ve had four office moves this past year because of
construction on our floor.  Please, please tell me that when we move to the
new building, I won,t have to move offices ever again.

Substitute Building Guy (with Mark Haedicke standing next to him):  Well,
good news, I can promise you that new building will be Enron,s state of the
art and Jeff Skilling has mandated that there won,t be any more construction
in the new building for at least 2 years after it opens.  But as for whether
you,ll be moving offices again, I think I better let your general counsel,
Mark Haedicke address that question.  Mark.

Mark Haedicke in a dry, public service announcement deadpan:  Thanks,
Substitute Building Guy and thank you [lawyer,s name] for your question.
[Lawyer,s name], as you pointed out, you have had to move 4 times this year
and although you may feel it,s been disruptive, your office moves and those
of your colleagues have produced some very valuable unintended consequences
that we want to continue enjoying: first, constant office moves promote
increased collegiality; second, constant office moves ensure that ENA Legal
remains at the "cutting edge of Enron's document retention policies"; and,
third, constant office moves have dramatically reduced our outside counsel
litigation fees since we have no documents to produce during discovery
requests.  As a result, I am pleased to announce our new "quarterly office
move policy".  Our new quarterly office move policy will continue to promote
the foregoing objectives and, in fact, I intend to suggest to Jim Derrick at
the next general counsel,s meeting that we implement this policy on a
corporate basis.  Remember, we may be done with construction, but we,ll never
be done moving.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.


The Holocaust Museum Houston's Human Race event is scheduled for February 4,
2001. Once again, Enron is the title sponsor of this fabulous event. We are
planning a media kick-off event to take place at the Holocaust Museum on
November 20, 2000 at 10 a.m. The purpose of this event is to attract media
attention and officially open registration for the race. If your schedule
allows, we would like for you to speak at the kick-off again, as you did last
year.

Mayor Brown, HISD Superintendent Rod Paige and Ed Allday, event chair for the
Human Race, will also speak at the kick-off. The museum would like for each
speaker to spend approximately five minutes talking about the importance of
diversity in their respective environments. For example, the mayor will talk
about diversity in the city of Houston, Rod Paige will speak to diversity in
schools, Ed will talk about how the event highlights diversity, and you would
be asked to talk about how Enron approaches diversity in the work-place.

If you are able to do this, Community Relations will draft your speaking
points. We will call Rosie to check on your availability.

Many thanks,

Missy Stevens


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/24/2000 06:23
AM ---------------------------

judy townsend <jtownse@yahoo.com> on 03/23/2000 07:08:38 PM
To: cgerman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Fw: IF THEY MATED!!!!]]

Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
X-Apparently-To: jtownse@yahoo.com via web1303.mail.yahoo.com
X-Track2: 2
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from mail.lesco.com (207.140.217.4)  by mta215.mail.yahoo.com with
SMTP; 23 Mar 2000 16:12:20 -0000
Message-ID: <38DA3712.E9FB97CD@lesco.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 10:24:03 -0500
From: LESCO Service Center #518 <sls518@lesco.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; SCO_SV 3.2 i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jtownse@yahoo.com, sls395@lesco.com, sls552@lesco.com,  sls510@lesco.com
Subject: [Fwd: Fwd: Fw: IF THEY MATED!!!!]]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------7D8504B97C10599978C9D35D"
Content-Length: 117044

Return-Path: <klamza@hotmail.com>
Received: from hotmail.com ([216.33.149.117]) by mail.lesco.com
(Netscape Messaging Server 3.62)  with SMTP id 350          for
<sls518@lesco.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 20:40:02 -0500
Received: (qmail 96653 invoked by uid 0); 23 Mar 2000 01:38:59 -0000
Message-ID: <20000323013859.96652.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 165.91.70.166 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2000
17:38:44 PST
X-Originating-IP: [165.91.70.166]
From: "Kevin Lamza" <klamza@hotmail.com>
To: walleigh2@yahoo.com, raleighdog@hotmail.com, george@4.0andgo.com,
davidkutac@hotmail.com, c_chaloupka@yahoo.com, brandy2@tca.net,
brandy-bohac@tamu.edu, kkubenka@hotmail.com, bigkolache@hotmail.com,
brivera@tamu.edu, sls518@lesco.com, glenn_barta@hotmail.com,
GDKPIKP@excite.com, lyndsay_taylor@hotmail.com, marissaag1@hotmail.com,
m_chaloupka@yahoo.com, rkubenka@hotmail.com, tetheredge@ahtr.com,
timdog@tamu.edu
Subject: Fwd: Fw: IF THEY MATED!!!!]
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:38:44 CST
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_3532d280_650b9d4e$7919073d"

?	?	From: "Kevin Marak" <kmarak@hotmail.com>
		To: amymarak@hotmail.com, klamza@hotmail.com, scottsimper@hotmail.com,
hipasshomey@hotmail.com, brivera@tamu.edu, crivera_2@hotmail.com,
tobysimon@yahoo.com, fredh@tamu.edu, c_frytager@yahoo.com,
judpav@hotmail.com, Ckobza@aol.com, andy_carrie@yahoo.com,
sylvia@Talltex.com, bigkolache@hotmail.com, ssartain@yahoo.com,
jdawgg12@yahoo.com, chsmith02@hotmail.com, candeyoung@mpinet.net,
deagen00@hotmail.com, eric69m@hotmail.com, gss1537@yahoo.com,
kelogchevy@aol.com, jrm9691@yahoo.com, ke8324@yahoo.com,
manuelabor@hotmail.com, mmutschink@hotmail.com, m_a_ulrich@hotmail.com,
eso99@hotmail.com, royzilla@hotmail.com, scottwhitmire@hotmail.com,
kts3324@yahoo.com, rdz1162@yahoo.com, stdwer12@shsu.edu,
keystone4weasel@hotmail.com
		Subject: Fwd: Fw: IF THEY MATED!!!!]
		Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 19:26:14 CST

		?
		?
		From: "MELODY BROWN" <melbrown84@hotmail.com>
		To: stdaem12@shsu.edu, x02259@exmail.usma.army.mil, becky_jo77@hotmail.com,
trissebo@airmail.net, pinhigh100@mindspring.com, CourtScot@aol.com,
stdcnh12@shsu.edu, stdjdm21@shsu.edu, dzkeilers@harding.edu,
jackfricks38@hotmail.com, stdeds17@shsu.edu, x01579@exmail.usma.army.mil,
STDHMB11@SHSU.EDU, stdhrh11@shsu.edu, jessicaegerlich@hotmail.com,
jasoniscool@hotmail.com, jack_joff@yahoo.com, JAMES_SIMS@HOTMAIL.COM,
stdklb22@shsu.edu, stdkeg12@shsu.edu, stdklh11@shsu.edu, STDKRK15@shsu.edu,
stdltg13@shsu.edu, stdaew11@shsu.edu, stdmla12@shsu.edu,
Z_STOFFELSMC@TITAN.SFASU.EDU, BRANDONC@EV1.NET, Mbrown2@us.rhodia.com,
KMARAK@HOTMAIL.COM, stdskw15@shsu.edu, stdsjr11@shsu.edu, stdsmr14@shsu.edu,
lawnsofnature@ev1.net, JENI@RICE.EDU, stdtjb12@shsu.edu
		CC: btif78@aol.com
		Subject: Fwd: Fw: IF THEY MATED!!!!]
		Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:34:15 PST

		?
		?
		From: Mindy Kovarcik <kovarcik@yahoo.com>
		To: Jennifer Smith <j_smithsfasn@yahoo.com>,? Christel White
<christeldwhite@yahoo.com>,? Christie Leigh Abshire
<southernbelle_cl@yahoo.com>,? Melody Brown <melbrown84@hotmail.com>, Cindi
<sun14moon@aol.com>,? Boomer Cornwell <b1831@aol.com>, David Daniel
<firestrength@hotmail.com>,? Stefany Mudder <tweetyskm@prodigy.net>, Cassie
Munoz <munozc@prodigy.net>
		Subject: Fwd: Fw: IF THEY MATED!!!!]
		Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 14:36:20 -0800 (PST)

		Note: forwarded message attached.

		__________________________________________________
		Do You Yahoo!?
		Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
		http://im.yahoo.com

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

X-Apparently-To: kovarcik@yahoo.com via web804.mail.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <lhensler@swbell.net>
X-Track2: 2
X-Track: -20
Received: from mta2.rcsntx.swbell.net (151.164.30.26)  by
mta222.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2000 21:36:09 -0000
Received: from loren ([32.100.139.34]) by mta2.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun
Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with SMTP id
<0FRQ004E5P8QMK@mta2.rcsntx.swbell.net>; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:35:32 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:35:56 -0600
From: Lori Hensler <lhensler@swbell.net>
Subject: Fw: IF THEY MATED!!!!]
To: Terri <Tgolwas@aol.com>, Tamra <tforsyth@lcc.net>, Rusty
<rustybrown@sprintmail.com>, Marci <marci_0@yahoo.com>, Mara
<maralynn@lcc.net>, Kristen <bkrkelton@worldnet.att.net>, Julie
<jlvivian@killoughmail.alief.isd.tenet.edu>, Elizabeth <Elizafulli@aol.com>,
Dad & GJ <gloriamiller@mindspring.com>, Crystal <klose@worldnet.att.net>,
Cindy and Bart <cabhen@hotmail.com>, Butch <CAROLSTR.TWILSON@NEWHOLLAND.COM>,
Blake <jbhensler@yahoo.com>, Amber <phlegmmy@hotmail.com>, Todd
<todds@sat.net>, Amy <arwhite@lcc.net>, Brad <capricorn_7476@usa.net>, Jill
<j1996@hotmail.com>, Rachael <rahrulz@aol.com>, Kim <kimdfischer@yahoo.com>,
Trent <steph_trent@yahoo.com>, Rebecca <becs21@hotmail.com>, Erin
<erincarrell@hotmail.com>, Victor <victor@inu.net>, Alison
<aririon@hotmail.com>, Christel <christeldwhite@yahoo.com>, Stefany
<tweetyskm@prodigy.net>, Mindy <kovarcik@yahoo.com>
Message-id: <007c01bf92b4$527c2720$228b6420@loren>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006C_01BF9281.FBBBF960"
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Priority: 3
Content-Length: 107508

too funny!

 - mated.jpg


DCongel@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Dear Market Participants:

The latest versions of advisory statements have been
posted to each customer's web site for the billing
month of May 2001.


USA: UPDATE 1-PG&E utility gives Calpine debt priority status.

07/06/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

(changes 1st paragraph, adds details, company statement)
SAN JOSE, Calif., July 6 (Reuters) - Independent power generator Calpine
Corp. said on Friday that its contracts with Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
will be altered, ensuring that Calpine will continue to supply power to the
bankrupt California utility and that it will get paid more than $250 million
for power already sold.
Calpine stocks rose more than 14 percent, or more than $5, to $43 after the
announcement.
As part of the contract modification, the $267 million, with interest, that
the utility, a unit of PG&E Corp , owes Calpine in past due receivables under
the contracts, will be elevated to "administrative priority status," a claim
which is paid before any other general unsecured creditors.
Calpine will get the money, in a lump sum, as soon as PG&E has a confirmed
reorganization plan, which can take as long as four to six months from now,
Calpine said.
The move is also a step in the process of untangling California's energy
crisis, which stemmed from a flawed deregulation plan that has hit the state
with a series of rolling blackouts.
Under the agreement, Calpine will continue to receive its contractual
capacity payments, but it has also set up a fixed rate contract for the next
five years of about 5.37 cents per kilowatt-hour.
The contracts are known as qualifying facility contracts because Calpine's
power plants are qualifying facilities. These types of facilities represent
more than 20 percent of the state's power supply and sell power generated
from renewable energy sources to the regulated utilities.
"Calpine is the first power company to modify its QF contract with PG&E to
ensure that Northern California consumers will continue to benefit from these
affordable and reliable energy resources," Calpine senior vice president
James Macias said in a statement.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


I reserved a one-way ticket on Continental last night for 6:45am Tuesday,
19th.  It cost $263.00 and its completly refundable.  Sounds good to me.   I
told the reservation lady that I was thinking about buying 2 tickets and just
get my money back for the one I don't use.  I would buy one leaving Monday
evening and the one for Tuesday morning

COOL, don't you think?

"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 09/01/2000 06:15:24 AM
To: "'Germany, Chris'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Phone Call

Sorry... I didn't call last night.

I was working on my September spreadsheet for TCO at home. I was going to
take a break and call you and my parents... but I had to get the spreadsheet
done for the long weekend. I finished it at 1:30 am. Thought this would be
too late to call.

Hopefully the weekend scheduling goes smooth, so I can work on August
Accounting this afternoon. I'm just extemely slow at everything right now.

Let's talk this afternoon.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


i think i told her i have great ankles and beautiful muscle definition in my
thighs.  where should i go?  i was thinking el tiempo to drink some ritas.


I heard Pat Radford is leaving, and you know Bob Carter is leaving, right?


survey.enron.com

Today is your last chance to fill out the survey.

We want to thank each of you for taking time to complete The Pulse, our
annual employee feedback survey.  We have had great participation to-date )
more than 61 percent of our employees have filled it out.  For those of you
who have not yet had an opportunity, please take 10 to 15 minutes today to
"check your pulse."  Let's finish strong.


Carol:

For your information and Susan's, Christie Patrick will not be available on the
4th of May.  She will be out of the city.  Maybe Susan can contact her directly
at another time.

I still have 1:30 as the time for Vince and Susan to meet.

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 03:30 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
04/09/2001 11:14 AM
To:	susan.hansen@stanford.edu
cc:
Subject:	Visit with Vince Kaminski on May 4th

Good morning Susan:

Vince forwarded the below message to me and after looking over his
calendar, he appears to be free most of the afternoon on the 4th of May.

Please let me know what would be a good time for you and I will block
it out before someone else gets it.

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group
713-853-5290
email:  Shirley. Crenshaw@enron.com

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 11:05 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
04/06/2001 05:36 PM
To:	"Susan C. Hansen" <susan.hansen@stanford.edu> @ ENRON
cc:	Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Re: Visit from Stanford?

Susan,

Thank you for your message. I shall be glad to meet with you on May the 4th.
I shall ask my assistant, Shirley Crenshaw (713) 853 5290, to call you to set up the meeting.

Also, for your information, we have recently set up a special unit to coordinate Enron's
relationships with the universities. The person running this unit is Christie Patrick.
Please, feel free to contact her and give my name as a reference. I shall coordinate the meeting
on May  the 4th with her.

Vince

Additional information re Christie:

Phone :      (713) 853-6117

Email:         christie_patrick@enron.com

"Susan C. Hansen" <susan.hansen@stanford.edu> on 04/03/2001 04:33:54 PM
To:	vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Visit from Stanford?

Dear Dr. Kaminski,

Let me briefly introduce myself, I am the Director of Corporate Relations
for the School of Engineering at Stanford University.  In this role, I am
always on the watch for ways to bring our faculty together with companies
that have an appetite for engagement with top tier research institutions.

I believe you know Hill Huntington, who is a senior researcher with
Stanford's Energy Modeling Forum.  He suggested I get in touch with you for
some ideas about contacts at Enron.  I'm in the process of planning a trip
to Texas in early May along with my colleague Donna Lawrence, the
university's Director of Corporate Relations.  We were hoping to be able to
include a stop at Enron on our itinerary. Right now it appears that Friday,
May 4th would work best for us but we're at the very beginning of our trip
planning.

The purpose of our visit would be to review the current relationship
between Enron and Stanford, to give you an overview of current priorities
in the School of Engineering, and ask for your help in identifying the best
points of contact.

I look forward to hearing from you about your availability,

Sincerely,
Susan Hansen

Susan C. Hansen
Director, Corporate Relations
School of Engineering
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4027
(650) 725-4219

<Embedded StdOleLink>


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001
12:11 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Phillip K Allen                           02/15/2001 01:13 PM

To: stagecoachmama@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject:

Lucy,

Thanks for clearing up the 2/2 file.  Moving on to 2/9, here are some
questions:

#1 It looks like he just missed 1/26&2/9 of $110.  I can't tell if he still
owes $47 on his deposit.

#13 I show she missed rent on 1/26 and still owes $140.

#15 Try and follow up with Tomas about the $95.  Hopefully, he won't have a
bad reaction.

#20b Missed rent?

#26  Has she paid any deposit or rent?

#27 Missed rent?


p	44
o	16

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wong, Michael F
Sent:	Monday, December 03, 2001 1:07 PM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	tomorrow's mark

please,
MW


This is to remind you that various anonymous reporting facilities are
available for you to report violations of Company policy and suspected
criminal conduct by any officer, employee, or agent of Enron relating to the
performance of his or her duties.  These reporting facilities are also
available for your questions, messages, comments, and suggestions.

 Any policy violation or criminal conduct may be reported by letter, e-mail,
or voice mail, as set forth below, describing the suspected violation or
criminal conduct with as much detail as possible to allow Enron to conduct an
investigation of the reported matter.

1. Letters should be sent to the Confidential Post Office Box:

Enron Compliance Officer
Confidential - Conduct of Business Affairs
P. O. Box 1188
Houston, Texas  77251-1188

2. E-mails should be sent to the Office of the Chairman,s e-mail box:
Employees with Enron e-mail can access this box by sending an e-mail to the
Office of the Chairman.  Simply type &Office of the Chairman8 in the address
box, type your message, and send.  Your message will be completely
anonymous.  If, however, you copy your message and e-mail it to someone else,
the copy will not be anonymous.

3. Voice mail messages should be left with the Office of the Chairman voice
mail box.  You can access the Office of the Chairman voice mail box at (713)
853-7294.  If you call from your extension or an outside line, your message
will be completely anonymous.  If, however, you access the voice mail box
while you are in the Enron voice mail system, your message will not be
anonymous.

 You may, but are not required to, identify yourself.  If you would like to
identify yourself, please submit your name and phone number with your letter
or message.  All anonymously reported matters will be investigated and acted
upon in the same manner as those that contain signatures.

 We take great pride in ensuring that Enron is a great place to work.  We
encourage each employee to continue to conduct Enron's business affairs in
accordance with all applicable laws and in a moral and honest manner.


I will be travelling on 11/12 so here's the update:

Sonoran Pipeline -  Received offer price from Kinder Morgan to purchase capacity on their project.
Marketing -
	Panda Energy - Presented capacity offer to Panda on 11/6.  They liked the swing capability, but fuel is an issue.  They will present the offer to their partner 	TECO.  We expect their counter offer by week end 11/16.
	AZ Public Service -  Scheduled next meeting for 11/16 in Phoenix.  Working on finishing Pre-pay and SFV rate designs.
El Paso / FERC  - No word yet on direction of Full Requirements settlement.
Copper Eagle Gas Storage - No word yet on our submitted bid.

Leave me a voicemail if you have questions.

thanks


the network may be in here shortly to interview me (Claire Shipman?)  Did the parents make it out of town OK?


Norman,
Please be tuned into this concern
Thanks,
Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ramesh, Ganapathy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:42 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank; Hu, Wei
Subject:	RE: New instrument type code from ENPower

Frank,
Just wanted to let you know that at some point in time(not too long), this process of us changing the instrument type codes to manage upstream changes to instrument type codes will fail. This change must be handled by EnPower and given to RisktRAC. This way, we do not have to be concerned when new instrument type code changes are introduced. Since the interface of exchanging data is then owned by the upstream system, any changes happening in the calc programs will simultaneously affect the interface and the change will be made at that point. This will also be an incentive for upstream users to be more aware of the changes. We can concentrate on providing better quality reports and give the time to clean up our reporting and database efficiency. Otherwise, I have the team changing our programs to keep up with upstream system feeds.

Regards,
Ganapathy Ramesh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:07 PM
To:	Hu, Wei; Ramesh, Ganapathy
Subject:	FW: New instrument type code from ENPower

She's okay, I'm okay
Pizza tomm.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:05 AM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Subject:	RE: New instrument type code from ENPower

yes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 6:48 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	FW: New instrument type code from ENPower

Are you okay with this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hu, Wei
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 5:29 PM
To:	Hayden, Frank
Cc:	Ramesh, Ganapathy
Subject:	New instrument type code from ENPower

Frank,

We were just informed by Norman Lee's group that ENPower is going to put out a new instrument type code called 'TRANSMISSION' and it basically is a kind of SPREADOPTION, so we will modify the code and capture them as SPREADOPTION.

Also we were told that we should handle one existing instrument type code INDEX-OPTION as SPREADOPTION too.  INDEX-OPTION has been captured as OPTION so far.  We will also make the code change for this.

Anytime when ENPower introduces new instrument type code in the future, we need to be informed because there are 15 - 20 instruemnt type codes existing in ENPower system and we need to convert them into one of the six instrument type codes in RisktRAC.

I am going to make the changes tomorrow.

Regards,

Wei


Larry Anderson with Carr has called to inquire about ENA financials and an Enron Corp. guaranty.  From an historical perspective, it has always been my understanding that Enron Corp. did not wish to provide guaranties to brokers and we have been successful in that regard with several recent exceptions.  In particular, Enron Corp. provided Carr with a "comfort letter" reciting the corporate "policy of general financial responsibility and interest in seeing that subsidiaries act responsibly."  [letter dated February 16, 1999]  Such letter is no longer sufficient to satisfy Credit Agricole which owns Carr.

Joe, I believe that Larry may have already spoken with you.  I don't know if your conversation included discussion of a guaranty.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


My memory needs refreshing as I'm noticing curve type codes and risk type codes that I don't know.

Curve Type Code:
AP
AV
BP
BV
PR
SP
VO

Book type code:
D
I
M
P
X

I should probably be shot for forgetting this stuff, but your help will be appreciated.
Thanks
Frank


Ben, its all been moved to one sheet and is available in the naes directory
as well. It's password protected so just view at it read-only. If you see
anything that needs to change let me know. By the way, when you open it up
sometimes it can look kind of psychadelic - just zoom in or out and it fixes
itself. Thanks.

Ryan


FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:23 PM
To: Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal
D.; Bike, Anne
Subject: FW: (01-363) Exchange Will Close Day After Thanksgiving;
Reduced TradingHours Through Year's End

FYI regarding day after Thanksgiving (closed) and trading hours (9am-1:30pm) for the rest of the year.

-----Original Message-----
From: soblander@carrfut.com [mailto:soblander@carrfut.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:09 PM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
Subject: FW: (01-363) Exchange Will Close Day After Thanksgiving;
Reduced TradingHours Through Year's End

FOR YOUR INFORMATION
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Exchange Information
> Sent:   Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:45 PM
> To:     Exchange Information
> Subject:     (01-363) Exchange Will Close Day After Thanksgiving; Reduced
> Trading Hours Through Year's End
>
> Notice No. 01-363
> October 30, 2001
>
>              TO:       All NYMEX and COMEX Division Members
>                             All Clearing Members and
> Member Firms
>
>              FROM:          J. Robert Collins, Jr., President
>
>              RE:       Exchange Will Close Day After
> Thanksgiving; Reduced Trading Hours Through Year's End
>
__________________________________________________________________________
> _________________
>
> The New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., today announced that it will
close
> on Friday, November 23, and hold reduced trading hours through the end of
> 2001:
>
> The board made these decisions to provide some relief in consideration of
> continued transportation difficulties and the overwhelming desire
> expressed to us by our customers and traders to spend the holiday with
> their families. After the events of last month, enabling families to be
> together has become more critical than ever.
>
> All contract expiration dates will remain unchanged, including the light,
> sweet crude oil options expiration scheduled for Wednesday, November 14,
> and the crude oil futures expiration scheduled for Monday, November 19.
>
> The COMEX Division futures and options contracts will begin opening
> earlier on November 5, with the rest of the opening times and all closing
> times remaining the same.
>
> As of November 5, the schedule will be as follows:
> Contract                    Open Outcry Trading
> NYMEX ACCESS
 Trading
> Copper                      8:10 AM to 1:00 PM
> 7 Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 8 AM
> Aluminum                    8:15AM to 1:05 PM         7
> Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 8 AM
> Gold                        9:00 AM to 1:05 PM        7
> Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 8 AM
> Silver                      9:05 AM to 1:10 PM
> 7 Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 8 AM
> Eurotop 100
 and 300
 futures          8:15 AM to 11:00 AM
> Palladium Futures           8:40 AM to 1:00 PM        7
> Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 8 AM
> Platinum                    8:45 AM to 1:05 PM        7
> Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 8 AM
> Propane Futures                  9:20 AM to 1:10 PM
> 5 to 7 PM, Mon - Thurs.
> Natural Gas                            10:00 AM to 2:30 PM
> 7 Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 9 AM
> Brent Crude Oil                  9:45 AM to 2:30 PM
> 7 Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 9 AM
> Light, Sweet Crude Oil                           10:00 AM to 2:30 PM
> 7 Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 9 AM
> Heating Oil                                      10:05 AM to 2:30 PM
> 7 Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 9 AM
> Unleaded Gasoline                           10:05 AM to 2:30 PM
> 7 Sun./3:15 PM, M-Th to 9 AM
> Crack Spread Options                                  10:05 AM to 2:30 PM
>
> Brent/WTI Spread Options               10:00 AM to 2:30 PM
> Coal Futures                                     10:30 AM to 2:00 PM
>


O.K. like I said earlier, update me on what the guys think!

---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001
03:41 PM ---------------------------

"PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on 04/17/2001
03:25:00 PM
To: Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Commission

That is not the case. I know what Mark and Tom trade, I apologize if I
misspoke. All daily trades, as well as hourly trades will now be a flat fee
charge of $15 per trade. This covers any size transaction.

----- Original Message -----
From: Evelyn Metoyer  <Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com>
At:  4/17 16:20

>
> Tom and Mark are not spot traders, they're cash traders. The Real Time guys
> are now being charged $15 for trades - but cash and term traders should
> still be charged the traditional $.005.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on
> 04/17/2001 02:28:57 PM
>
> To:   Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Commission
>
>
> Evelyn, as of April 16, 2001 our charge for Spot trades is a flat fee of
> $15/trade.


Yahoo! News	Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!

	Breaking News Alert	 edit
WASHINGTON _ FDA approves new drug to treat rare form of leukemia.

	Click here!
	[IMAGE]

If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.

Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy


What is ETA and PA?

Thanks


We have not decided "to prevent any regulated utility from completing any
financial transactions" online.  If we have already satisfactorily concluded
the necessary due diligence with respect to a particular utility, they will
be approved.  It is only with respect to those utilities which have not yet
been researched that we are withholding approval.  The due diligence required
involves asking the utility for certain information concerning their
organization and regulatory situation, hiring local counsel in the relevant
state and having research done into the laws and regulations in place there
and into any public utility commission orders respecting the particular
utility in question, and on occasion requesting an opinion letter from the
utility's counsel.  We usually begin that process only when a trader believes
there is a likelihood of a sufficient volume of trading with the utility to
justify the time and expense.  FYI, the due diligence process has in the past
revealed circumstances which prevented the utility from trading derivatives
or required actions to authorize such trading which had not been taken.

A recent count showed about 10 executed master agreements and another 30 to
40 in one stage or another of the due diligence/negotiation process.

Louise Kitchen
10/06/99 02:46 PM
To: Mark E Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Port/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Customer Data

On Friday we will be receiving the remaining customer list from credit, due
to the timescales I am asking for turnaround on the customer matrix and
master agreement review by the end of play Tuesday 12th October.

Any problems with this please notify me immediately as we are now running up
against very tight deadlines in terms of getting all of the information in
the system for the launch schedule.

Thanks

Louise

Mark,
On another note we are requesting a review of the blanket decision which has
been made to prevent any regulated utility from completing any financial
transactions, if we are not prepared to do the due diligence on which ones
can transact and which ones can not - is this our responsibility or theirs?
ie their decision whether to trade or not.
Louise


Thanks babe. You are so sweet. I love being with you every day. That is why it is so hard for me when we go a week without being together (real close, that is). I will miss you too. Every time I think of you I will remember the ham (since you don't like them). Talk to you soon.

Love,
	Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Harris, Steven
Subject:

It has been great to spend time with you.  I am really going to miss you this week.  I need a kiss before I leave.
Don't forget to order your ham.

Love you.


Return-path: <Texcorey@aol.com>
From: Texcorey@aol.com
Full-name: Texcorey
Message-ID: <174.1a169b0.29638c28@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 17:03:20 EST
Subject: (no subject)
To: VKaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part2_3c.1702737b.29638c28_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118

Vince
Still no word from Eric - Alaina gave me the following information:
             Kenneth Hughes  909 Fannin Ste 3800
                                     713.659.1122
She said he is really good.
P


Next week is Twas the Night Before Christmas.


Rich,

We are currently talking to a few parties about the possible sale of New
Albany.  I expect to send out draft schedules to the form of Purchase and
Sale Agreement on Wednesday.  These schedules will reveal the existence of
the litigation between Power Systems and GE and I expect that numerous
questions will follow.  What I would like to do is prepare for these
questions in advance so as to not slow down negotiations.  Does it make sense
to make copies of the files that we have to date (including the petitions,
etc. on the existing equipment and the legal opinions on the new equipment
that Power Systems is trying to sell us)?  If so, please have Linda put this
together ASAP.  Please ask her to separate the information dealing with the
existing problems from the information on the possible solutions (i.e. new
Power Systems technology currently being offered).  This is because I do not
expect to immediately offer up the new technology as a solution that we are
willing to provide.

If this doesn,t work, please let me know.

Many thanks in advance.

Stuart


Jeff,

I took care of the Executive Viewer.  I talked to Frank and apparently
Lavorato wants to see the Canadian breakout next week.  I already have
everything set up to do the positions, but we need to work on Canada to get
the P&L.  Intra-Canada has a breakout but it's only in Canadian dollars.  I
left a message for Kathy to call me.  Just wanted to give you a heads up.

Talk to you Monday.
Robin

Jeffrey C Gossett
11/18/2000 12:40 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Urgent!!!!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 11/18/2000
12:33 PM ---------------------------

John J Lavorato@ENRON
11/18/2000 12:28 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Jeff

My management line is hidden on my hard copy report but not on the executive
viewer.  Make sure its hidden on the executive viewer.


Good point.  Is that also Bear Creek storage?  The tax bill specifically
states Sonat Bear Creek storage.  I also left a voicemail for our tax guy.
There is no support for the tax bill so I don't know how the taxing authority
comes up with their number.  I would like to see it but I bet it takes a
while to get the support.

I also have a tax bill for Koch Bistenau storage.  We have some type of deal
with NOPSI.  Any other ideas on that?

Dave Scott@EES
01/04/2001 03:27 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Taxes

Have you confirmed that this isn't for Tennessee Valley Supply Group (TVSG)
storage volumes, which ENA purchased from CES?

David

Chris Germany@ECT
01/04/2001 03:23 PM
To: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES, Dave Scott/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy L
Ray/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Tilotta/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Taxes

I have a tax bill to Columbia Energy Services in the amount of $5,606.78 for
gas stored at the Bear Creek Storage facility.  The amount is $5,606.78 and
it is for the the 2000 tax year.  I was notified about this yesterday and I
think it was due on 12/31/2000.

How do you want to handle this?  I was going to pay it and bill New Power for
the whole amount.  I will also have our tax department fax a copy to Jeff.

Robert, please fax a copy of the letter from Jimmie Smith and the CES tax
bill to Jeff Porter at 713-646-3499.

Thanks


As requested, please find attached revised approval forms for Credit for 12/6
and 12/7.  "read only" has been removed.

Thank you
Molly


Excellent response.  Agree with this approach.  Thanks for the update.
Please let me know what happens.  SWD

WALT
ZIMMERMAN
03/16/2000 07:00 PM

To: Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc: Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lori Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan
Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott, Michael Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, jdegeeter@velaw.com

Subject: Todoroff Prosecution--CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE

Steve, as Dana indicated in his response to your message, Louis Dreyfus is
maintaining that their transactions with Todoroff are totally legitimate and
binding upon EOTT.  Vinson & Elkins is of the opinion that before we assert
an argument to Louis Dreyfus regarding the validity of their contract, we
need to hear the tapes of Todoroff's conversations with Louis Dreyfus.  The
"paper" that we have (including the notes from the Louis Dreyfus contract
administrator) certainly indicates that Louis Dreyfus suspected or knew that
something was not quite right about the December 1999 transaction with
Todoroff, but it is not enough to make a very good case for challenging the
validity/enforceability of that contract.  We need more.  John DeGeeter of
Vinson & Elkins has spoken with Louis Dreyfus'  general counsel.  Louis
Dreyfus' general counsel has told John that before he will consider providing
EOTT with the tapes, he wants EOTT to set forth in writing the reason EOTT is
requesting the tapes.  Louis Dreyfus' general counsel has also indicated that
he is not sure that Louis Dreyfus taped these conversations.

Although a final decision has not been made, here's where I think we are
headed with Louis Dreyfus.  We will send their general counsel a letter next
week indicating the irregularities with this contract (e.g. the prices quoted
in the contract were far below market, and the contract administrator had
questions about Todoroff's authorization and the "legality" of the deal).
This proposed letter would then suggest that Louis Dreyfus provide us with
their tape recordings of the conversations with Todoroff in order that we can
immediately resolve our questions as to whether one of Louis Dreyfus'
employees knowingly assisted Todoroff in his scheme to defraud EOTT.  My
guess is that a letter of that nature will at least cause Louis Dreyfus'
lawyers to listen to the tapes.  If the tapes do contain incriminating
conversations, we might see a softening of their negotiating position.  If
the tapes do not contain anything incriminating, it would seem to be in Louis
Dreyfus' best interest to provide us with the tapes to support their position
that there was nothing irregular about the transaction.

Steve Duffy
03/16/2000 01:47 PM
To: Walt Zimmerman/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc: Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lori Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan
Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott, Michael Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Todoroff Prosecution--CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE

Thanks for the update, Walt.  One option we were considering was a "share the
pain" settlement with Dreyfus, whereby they would let us buy out of the
remaining position at a steep discount (to acknowledge their contributory
negligence in this matter).  Has there been any additional headway in this
area?  I'm on vacation and haven't heard anything on this.  Weren't we going
to send a V&E litigator to visit Dreyfus' general counsel? If we commence
legal proceedings against Dreyfus, things will become costly and contentious
between us. Information will come slowly and grudgingly.  We have copies of
some of their internal notes which indicate that they knew---or should have
known---that something wasn't quite right with Todoroff's situation.  Before
we start filing discovery motions, we should exhaust the possibility of
meeting with their general counsel to see if a quick "business" settlement
can be obtained.  Please advise. Thanks.  SWD

WALT
ZIMMERMAN
03/16/2000 11:47 AM

To: Dana Gibbs/Houston/Eott@Eott, Lori Maddox/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan
Ralph/Houston/Eott@Eott
cc: Michael Burke/Houston/Eott@Eott, Steve Duffy/Houston/Eott@Eott, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Todoroff Prosecution--CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE

Earlier this week, I spoke with Bill Moore (the chief prosecutor in the
Harris County District Attorney's Special Crimes Unit) regarding the
above-referenced matter.  Mr. Moore acknowledged receiving the investigative
materials that we submitted last week, and he indicated that his office is
commencing its review of those materials.  I emphasized to Mr. Moore the
desire of EOTT's management to have this case aggressively prosecuted.  Mr.
Moore acknowledged that the aggressive prosecution of this matter would send
a strong message to other traders who might consider dishonest acts, and he
assured me that his office would vigorously pursue this matter.  Based upon
some statements made by Mr. Moore during our discussion, it was obvious that
he recalled much of the presentation from our initial meeting.  I will call
Mr. Moore again tomorrow afternoon to get an update on the progress of this
matter.

We are also attempting to obtain from Louis Dreyfus tape recordings of
Todoroff's conversations with them regarding the series of deals that we are
describing as "The Second Transaction."  If Louis Dreyfus does not
voluntarily provide us with copies of those tapes (or if they assert that
tapes do not exist), the next step will be to consider filing a lawsuit or
seeking a bill of discovery in order to obtain the tapes.  Based upon some
notes we have received from a contract administrator at Louis Dreyfus, it
appears that Louis Dreyfus also suspected or knew that something was amiss
with The Second Transaction.  Assuming that Todoroff's conversations with
Louis Dreyfus were taped, the tapes should tell us whether Todoroff had a
conspirator at Louis Dreyfus who assisted him in his scheme to defraud EOTT.

If Louis Dreyfus does not voluntarily produce tape recordings of its
conversations with Todoroff, we will need some guidance from Enron as to how
aggressive we should be in attempting to obtain the tapes.


Dr Marsha


My pleasure. Sounds like he's got a big job---glad that Enron can help....

Riccardo Bortolotti@ECT
09/04/2000 03:33 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Contact with Prominent UC Berkeley Energy Economist

Jeff,

thanks a lot for exceeding expectations .

Regards,

         R

Jeff Dasovich@EES
31/08/2000 16:49
To: fgobbo@luiss.it, Riccardo Bortolotti/LON/ECT@ECT,
borenste@haas.berkeley.edu
cc:

Subject: Contact with Prominent UC Berkeley Energy Economist

Greetings Dr. Gobbo:

If my memory serves, you should have arrived back in Italy, or will return
soon.  Since we met, I have spoken with Severin Borenstein, who is intimately
involved with California's electricity restructuring (melodrama?) and a
renowned energy economist  at UC Berkeley.  Severin has offered to serve as a
contact for you as you continue to take on the formidable task of
restructuring your country's electric industry.  I've included his contact
information below.  And, of course, if there is ever anything I can do for
you, do not hesitate to contact me.

All the best,
Jeff

Severin Borenstein

E.T. Grether Professor of Business
  Administration and Public Policy   Director
Haas School of Business              U.C. Energy Institute
University of California             2539 Channing Way
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900              Berkeley, CA 94720-5180
(p) 510-642-3689                     (p) 510-642-5145
(f) 707-885-2508                     http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei

Email: borenste@haas.berkeley.edu
WWW: http://haas.berkeley.edu/~borenste


Talked to John Fielder (SVP at the utility) this morning in an attempt to determine if Edison will come around and pay us the PX credit they owe us.

Summary of our offer:
Edison pays us 90% of what they owe us as of 01.17.01.
Payment structure: Edison pays us 10% immediately, with an agreed to (speedy) payment schedule for the remaining 90%.
In return, we drop our complaint against Edison at the PUC.
In return, we agree to a bottoms-up approach retroactive to March 1 to replace the current PX Credit/Residual CTC framework.

Fielder said that he didn't see any show-stoppers in our proposal, but had to check back on his end.  However, there were three additional issues that he wanted to add to any deal:
Some agreement regarding payment of Edison's undercollection (this would cover any of our DA customers who were bundled services customers pre-January 17). We agreed that this would only be an issue to the extent that the Legislature and/or the PUC agreed that Edison should get authority to recoup its undercollection in rates.
Some agreement on DWR stranded costs.  John expressed the view that DWR bought power under the assumption that the customers who've recently gone DA would be there to take the power, and now that they've left, they should contribute in some way to any stranded costs. I told John that this issue is a hornet's nest, that we were better off leaving it out, but we'd consider his proposals.
Some agreement on forebearance.  I told John that if Edison agrees to pay us, it didn't seem that forebearance would be off the table.

We agreed to touch base at the same time Wednesday morning.  The idea is that he'll get back to me with Edison's reaction to our proposal; and we'd get back to him on Edison's proposals.

Might be useful to determine whether we want to continue the discussions.  While John seemed very inclined to work something out, all signals are that the Legislature isn't inclinded to bail Edison out next week.  In which case, Edison could be in bankruptcy in a couple of weeks, which would presumably nullify any agreement we might reach with them. On the other hand, if the Legislature pulls a rabbit out of a hat, an agreement might have real value.

Any comments folks have on 1) Edison's proposals and 2) whether it makes sense to continue discussions on Wednesday are appreciated.  Seems that, at a minimum, if we agree to consider Edison's proposals, then our payment should go from 90 cents to 100 cents on the dollar.

Best,
Jeff


Ken:

One of the initiatives implemented at Global Strategic Souring since its
formation in February is to leverage Enron's aggregated purchasing power to
facilitate commercial development opportunities for the Business (EBS, EES,
EFS, and etc.) Units.

Annually, Enron spends several million dollars with COMPAQ for servers, desk
top computers, and lap top computers.  COMPAQ has also been selected as one
of the potential candidates to service the EnHome program.  COMPAQ is also
one of EBS's alliance partners.

Given the magnitude of Enron's relationship with COMPAQ, we have formed an
intercompany team comprised of representatives from EBS, EES, EFS, Global
Strategic Sourcing, and the EnHome Program.  In our most recent meeting the
business units reported the following:

COMPAQ has failed to define its requirements for EBS services under the
current alliance agreement between the companies.  COMPAQ has also denied EBS
access to expertise and installations required for product refinement and
implementation.  (Based on the feedback I have received, I question whether
COMPAQ intends to honor the terms and conditions of its relationship with
EBS).
EFS only provides building services currently to a couple of Compaq's
installations.
EES has been in discussions with COMPAQ for several months now.  Although we
are progressing, it would appear that we are at an impasse on the language in
the contract necessary to support the transaction.
On the EnHome program, COMPAQ has generally been unresponsive to our
questions and concerns for clarification and/or additional information on
their experience in operating this type of program.
The Widows 2000 Roll-out Contract literally has taken months to complete when
it should have only been a matter of weeks.

Ken, based on what I am seeing day-to-day, I am concerned that COMPAQ has
lost sight of the value of our total business and the value of a healthy,
bidirectional relationship.

Therefore, specifically given the unresponsiveness to our most recent
requests for clarification on the EnHome Program and our concerns regarding
there ability to operate a program of this magnitude, I have requested that
we reopen discussions with IBM and DELL.

I will keep you apprised of future developments.

George Wasaff


<<Draft dec statement ECS.doc>>

Here is a first cut at a revised draft based on the discussion this morning.
Clearly more work is needed on the reliability requirement angle.  We still
need the narrative information about the chronology of events/discussions
between ECS and WFEC.  We also need to follow Susan's suggestion with regard
to bullet points in the conclusion.  Finally, we will need the signature
block information from Bill Bryant.  Despite these deficiencies in the
attached draft, I thought it would be helpful to circulate this revised
draft.

Please copy both Tim Anthony and Russell Badders on your reply.

 - Draft dec statement ECS.doc


Tony -- here's an excerpt from PG&E's tariff on curtailment of service.

If you are curious about any of the rest of their tariff, see the "Gas Rules"
portion of their website at
http://www.pge.com/customer_services/business/tariffs/#GR


My official post ID's from Nov. 30th are 1424131 through 1424152, and 1424156 through 1424167, and 1424262 through 1424279.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:26 PM
To:	Brady, Edward; Clause, Kristen; Espey, Darren; Hungerford, James; Mills, Bruce; Rabon, Chance; Videtto, Melissa
Subject:	official post ids

I need all of your official post ids from your old books for the date of 11/30/01.  Please email them to me ASAP.
PL


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000 07:12
PM ---------------------------

Gloria G Barkowsky
01/17/2000 06:35 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CNG Field services/Coronado Pipeline

Chris - has there been any progress on this?  I still don't see
it in path manager under CNG Field Services.  Let me know.
Thanks,  Gloria 3-7118

Don't hate me for all these emails!


Pulpex Bulletin for Wednesday, October 24, 2001

Market News:

NBSK ------------------------------------------------------------
Nov01     420.00   428.00        -        -        -     -    79
Dec01     426.00   433.00        -        -        -     -   134
Jan02     431.00   438.00        -        -        -     -     -
Mar02     444.00   451.00        -        -        -     -    53
Jun02     443.00   472.00        -        -        -     -    40
Sep02     461.00   481.00        -        -        -     -    35
Dec02          -   497.00        -        -        -     -    15
Mar03          -        -        -        -        -     -     -

BEK -------------------------------------------------------------
Nov01     402.00   412.00        -        -        -     -   126
Dec01     406.00   415.00        -        -        -     -    35
Jan02     410.00   420.00        -        -        -     -     -
Mar02     415.00        -        -        -        -     -     -

Settlement Prices Futures
          Today      Chg      Prev
NBSK -------------------------------
Nov01    424.00     +0.00    424.00
Dec01    429.50     -2.50    432.00
Jan02    434.50     -1.00    435.50
Mar02    447.50     -1.00    448.50
Jun02    457.50     -2.00    459.50
Sep02    471.00     +0.00    471.00
Dec02    486.00     +0.00    486.00
Mar03    501.00     +0.00    501.00

BEK --------------------------------
Nov01    407.00     -1.50    408.50
Dec01    410.50     -2.50    413.00
Jan02    415.00     +0.00    415.00
Mar02    422.00     +0.00    422.00

The above tables should ideally be viewed using Courier or other fixed fonts.
During Pulpex opening hours (0830-1600 UK Time, 0930-1700 CET),prices
are distributed on our web page: http://www.pulpex.com

If you would like someone else to receive this bulletin or to cancel your own
please mail: info@pulpex.com or fax: +44 20 7065 8941


Hi Jennifer,

There was some discussion of this, but I haven't agreed to pay for the damage, as it was caused by a 3rd party contractor. When I was at the house I mentioned the damage to company that's responsible, and told them that we'd follow up for reparations.

If you'll forward the invoice (a copy will be fine) I'll try and run this down and see that it's taken care of.

Please send via interoffice -- I'm at EB2241

Thanks!

Paige

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Burns, Jennifer
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:57 PM
To:	Cox, Paige
Cc:	Evans, Carolyn; Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:
Importance:	High

Paige,

Some time ago Jeff had some wiring done at his home for use of his company laptop.  As you may recall there were some problems where the wiring was placed the first time and Jeff had to have his contractor come out and do repairs.  We had discussed your group reimbursing or paying for the repairs and the invoice has made it to my desk today.  Please let me know how you would like to proceed with this.

Thanks,
Jennifer

Jennifer Burns
Executive Assistant to Jeff Shankman
Enron Global Markets, LLC


If you have any questions, please let me know.  Thanks.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	FW: ssample of  work/pricing compound options/someone at Enron might lbe able to use this

can you take a look at this and give me some feedback?  thanks   Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	kgill@gsb.uchicago.edu@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-kgill+40gsb+2Euchicago+2Eedu+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 12:00 PM
To:	Hickerson, Gary
Cc:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	ssample of  work/pricing compound options/someone at Enron might lbe able to use this

 - V9P1.doc
 - V9P2.doc
 - V9P3.doc
 - V9P4.doc
 - V9P5.doc
 - V9P6.doc
 - V9P7.doc
 - V9P8.doc
 - V9P9.doc
 - Exhibit 1.doc
 - Exhibit 2.doc
 - Exhibit 3.doc
 - Exhibit 4.doc
 - Exhibit 5.doc
 - Exhibit 6 FINAL.doc
 - Exhibit 7.doc


The committee had a lengthy conference call today.  Let me touch on key
topics.  First, the application to employ PriceWaterhouse is being
contested by both the debtor and the US trustee.  There was a meeting today
with the debtor to narrow differences.  The debtor will provide a list of
its key concerns and we'll see if we can deal with them.  The UST just
believes that there is too much of a chance of conflict between roles in
the two cases.  We'll be setting a hearing soon to get the issue resolved
on way or the other.  Second, PGE has sought broad discovery from PX not
only of individual participants' claims against PGE but also underlying
trading information.  PX contends that much of this information cannot be
disclosed under the tariffs.  For that reason, PX hasn't even kprovided
this information to its participants.  Eisenberg is opposing the discovery
for that reason as well as based on burden to the debtor.  The PX committee
feels that Montali will accomodate discovery, at least to some extent.
Therefore, in the meet and confer this afternoon, the committee probably
will support disclosure if (1) participants get whatever of their
information as is disclosed to PGE, (2) substantial limitations are imposed
on the parties that will have access to the information and the use to
which it can be put and (3) PGE reimburses PX for a part of the cost.  In
addition, the committee intends to file a motion in the PX case requesting
that the debtor be ordered to turn information over to individual
participants and to our accountants who will have the responsibility to
test numbers but not to make general disclosure of accounts of individual
participants.  Third, Howard Weg believes that without some agreement on
the chargeback issue, FERC will take a long time to rule on whether PX
should return collateral.  Accordingly, Weg wants the participants to come
to an agreement that for any specified period, shortfalls will be shared
prorata among participants.  I asked Weg to send an email out to committee
members describing in detail his proposal and the basis for it so that we
could discuss it in detail during our next call.  Fourth, the commandeering
matters are proceeding.  The committee will complete interviews of
prospective counsel next Monday.  In the meantime, the Victims Compensation
Claims Board should rule June 22.  A summary denial is expected.
Interestingly, only about 30% of the participants submitted claims to the
board.  PX's expert opinion was made available to the committee.  He fixes
the value of commandeered contracts at $1.060 billion minus $350 million of
contract prices for a loss of just under $700 million.  We are following up
to test these numbers.  The committee's counsel has been negotiating a
stipulation for relief from stay in the PGE case.  It's moving too slowly,
so our counsel is drafting a stay relief motion for our review.  No one
seems inclined to start a commandeering suit until relief is granted.
Fifth, our counsel is having second thoughts about a stipulation with
Edison that would address the bond, the force majeur litigation and related
matters.  The question that is under review is whether the proposed deal
could be unwound if SCE files its own cha;pter 11 case.  On force majeur,
Judge Montali apparently rejected PGE's argument on that point.  Sixth,
there is still no deal with the trade creditors' committee.  They want
about double the $4 million we're offering.  We expect any day a motion to
extend plan exclusivity by the debtor.  Seventh, we discussed some
committee representation issues.  The committee voted against adding Puget
Sound as a member.  The committee agreed that it represented those who had
claims based on the scheduling coordinator role performed by PX for ISO.
The committee discussed whether it represented IOU's and concluded that it
did if they were owed in their role as sellers to the PX.  Finally, the
next meeting was set at 10 pst on June 25.  Feel free to call if there are
questions.  Bob Nelson


t:  Please print for me.  Thanks a lot! Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000 11:22
AM ---------------------------

Ann Park@ENRON
08/01/2000 10:11 AM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, FMackin@aol.com
cc: Timothy Callahan/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Due Diligence

Attached is my due diligence template for Canada.  Please feel free to use
those parts of it you feel appropriate.  Michelle, if I do not hear back I
will assume the deal team has decided to have the counsel handle this in my
place.  Please be sure to let Patrick Wade know.  If I can be of any other
assistance please let me know.


FYI
----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 03/20/2001 03:55 PM -----

	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>
	03/20/2001 02:30 PM

		 To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<donna.fulton@enron.com>, <janelle.scheuer@enron.com>,
<jeff_brown@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<Mary.Hain@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>, <sarah.novosel@enron.com>,
<tom.hoatson@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Commission Actions to Remove Obstacles in Western US- Key Points
for EPSA Comments, Due MARCH 30TH

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Joe Hartsoe, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
            Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy

DATE: March 20, 2001

RE: Commission Actions to Increase Supply and Decrease
      Consumption in the Western United States--Key Points for
      EPSA Comments Due MARCH 30TH

As we previously reported, on March 14, 2001, FERC announced certain actions
to address the energy problems in California and other areas of the West in
an Order Removing Obstacles to Increased Electric Generation and Natural Gas
Supply in the Western United States and Requesting Comments on Further
Actions to Increase Energy Supply and Decrease Energy Consumption.  The
following is an overview of the steps the Commission proposes to "immediately
help increase supply from existing power sources and to provide regulatory
incentives to build new electric and natural gas infrastructure."  The
Commission also invited comments on certain proposals.  This memo includes a
list of key points we intend to make in comments that are due by March 30th.

Overview of Order

The Order reflects a thorough review of  "all of [FERC's] rate and facility
certification authorities in the areas of electric energy, natural gas,
hydroelectric and oil to determine how it can increase electric energy
supply"; however, the Commission noted that its authority is "somewhat
limited."  While the Commission believes state regulators must assume the
lead role due to their authority over siting of generation and transmission,
as well as demand reduction measures, the Commission noted that the impact of
California's energy shortage on the Western Interconnection "underscores the
regional, interstate nature of the energy marketplace."  Accordingly, it
encouraged the formation of a single regional transmission organization for
western markets.

EPSA appreciates the Commission's effort to exercise the full extent of its
authority to help ease the West's energy problems.  Taken together, the
Commission's proposed actions represent positive steps toward rational
solutions to the difficult circumstances in the West.  Most importantly, the
Order highlights the importance of promoting infrastructure investment,
including increased generation, transmission and natural gas pipeline
facilities.

The Commission's immediate actions, which will expire on December 31, 2001,
include:

-Requiring the California ISO and transmission owners within the WSCC to
provide FERC with a list of short-term grid enhancements.

-Extending and broadening waivers of operating and efficiency standards and
fuel use requirements for qualifying facilities (QF).

-Providing wholesale power sales from generation used primarily for backup
and self-generation for businesses with prior notice waivers and market-based
rate authorization.

-Allowing wholesale and retail load reduction to be resold at wholesale
market-based rates.

The Commission seeks comment on several other proposals, including:

-Rolling in new supply interconnection and upgrade costs.

-Increasing the rate of return on equity for projects that significantly
increase transmission on constrained and new routes in the near term.

-10-year depreciation for short-term transmission projects, and 15-year
depreciation for upgrades involving new rights of way that can be in service
by November 1, 2002.

-Use of the interconnection authority set forth in FPA  o210(d) to help
alleviate obstacles to electric supply reaching load.

EPSA's Comments

In its conclusion, the Commission stated that comments should be "concise and
focused."  Accordingly, we suggest that EPSA's comments focus on the
following areas:

? Applaud the Commission's effort to increase supplies from QFs, but
encourage it to provide relief from existing contracts by allowing QFs to
sell to creditworthy parties.

? We understand that there are ongoing differences of opinion regarding the
relative merits of an incremental versus a "rolled in" approach to
interconnection and upgrade costs.  Therefore, while we may lack a consensus
on the question as a final policy position, we believe that the extreme
circumstances surrounding the Order, and the urgent need to move power
quickly into the Western system, make it wise to endorse FERC's instant
recommendation.

? The Commission's proposed actions to create and enhance incentives relating
to expanding and improving the transmission infrastructure through higher
ROEs and accelerated depreciation schedules are positive steps.  The
Commission normally conditions such premiums on meaningful participation in
regional transmission organizations.  However, given the current situation
and the immediate impact of any projects that might be entitled to the higher
ROE, EPSA could support this proposal.

? Constraints on the gas infrastructure have a generally adverse impact on
the energy supply system.  Therefore, the Commission's proposed waivers of
blanket certificates and rate incentives to expedite construction projects,
are favorable developments.

We will discuss the Order and EPSA's comments during tomorrow's Regulatory
Affairs/Power Marketers' conference call.  In addition, we have been asked to
consider what type of short-term relief could be included in federal
legislation.  We will discuss this question as well.  To access the call,
dial 1-800-937-6563 and ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA call. In the meantime,
if you have any questions, please contact either Julie Simon, jsimon@epsa.org
or Mark Bennett, mbennett@epsa.org at (202 628-8200).


Joe,

FYI. Please plan on attending. We should schedule a meeting with
mark and the rest of the weather team.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
10:54 AM ---------------------------

"Francis X. Diebold" <fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu> on 11/04/2000 08:47:41 AM
To: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
cc: Vince Kaminski <vkamins@enron.com>
Subject: Re: Your visit to Enron

Shirley,

The 21st is perfect.  I will go ahead and purchase my plane tickets.  Would
you
please make me a hotel reservation for the night of the 21st?

Many thanks,

Frank Diebold

Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com wrote:

> Good morning Professor Diebold:
>
> I am Vince Kaminski's assistant and he has forwarded your emails to me
> for scheduling purpose.  Unfortunately, we have a conflict on December
> 14th.  Can you possibly come on the 21st?
>
> I hope you have not already made your reservations.  If I can do anything
> to assist you, please let me know.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Shirley Crenshaw
> Administrative Coordinator
> Enron Research Group
> 713-853-5290
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000
> 09:29 AM ---------------------------
>
> Vince J Kaminski
> 11/02/2000 04:30 PM
>
> To:   "Francis X. Diebold" <fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu> @ ENRON
> cc:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
> Subject:  Re: visit?  (Document link: Shirley Crenshaw)
>
> Frank,
>
> Dec 14   would be  better for us. We have already scheduled
> an internal presentation on December 7.  Please, go ahead and make a
> reservation.
> The best place to stay is Hyatt Regency Downtown or Doubletree Downtown
> (within a walking distance to Enron). It is important to specify the
> downtown
> location for both hotels.
>
> Vince
>
> "Francis X. Diebold" <fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu> on 11/02/2000 03:00:49 PM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: visit?
>
> Sounds good, Vince.  How about Dec 7?  The roundtrip coach fare, regardless
> of
> airline, is about $1900.  I hope that won't break the bank.  Once I have
> your
> approval, I'll go ahead and book it.  Best, Frank
>
> Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> > Frank,
> >
> > Yes, I would be very interested in meeting with you in Houston in
> December.
> > The best day for visit would be Thursday when my group has a lunch
> meeting
> > and you could meet the rest of the research unit.
> >
> > Please, let me know what day would work for you. We shall be very glad to
> > cover the cost of your trip.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> > I
> >
> > "Francis X. Diebold" <fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu> on 10/31/2000 01:01:11 PM
> >
> > To:   Vince Kaminski <vkamins@enron.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject:  visit?
> >
> > Hi Vince,
> > Are you still interested in my visiting for a day, perhaps in Dec or
> > Jan?  I have begun a project on unobserved-components modeling of
> > weather patterns, so it would be productive and fun to compare notes.
> > Best,
> > Frank
> >
> > --
> > Francis X. Diebold
> > WP Carey Professor
> >
> > Department of Economics
> > University of Pennsylvania
> > 3718 Locust Walk
> > Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297
> >
> > fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu
> > http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold
> >
> > (215) 898-1507  telephone
> > (215) 573-4217  fax
>
> --
> Francis X. Diebold
> WP Carey Professor
>
> Department of Economics
> University of Pennsylvania
> 3718 Locust Walk
> Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297
>
> fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu
> http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold
>
> (215) 898-1507  telephone
> (215) 573-4217  fax

--
Francis X. Diebold
WP Carey Professor

Department of Economics
University of Pennsylvania
3718 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297

fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu
http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold

(215) 898-1507  telephone
(215) 573-4217  fax


Anne,

We should treat them both as ST.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Labbe, Anne
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 3:22 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	PRC Questions
Importance:	High

Vince,

I am just trying to make sure that all of the data is clean for your PRC meeting on Wednesday, and noticed that although Shane Green and Chris Pernoud are both specialist, Shane is Commercial Support (CS) and Chris is Specialized Technical (ST).  Please let me know if this is correct or if they should both either be ST or CS.  I am assuming that they should both be CS since the Sr. Specialist are all ST.  Additionally, I just wanted to let you know that the following people will not be rated during the meeting because their hire date was after December 31, 2000:
Anguel Grigorov
Wichai Narongwanich
Chris Pernoud
Leann Walton

Finally, please verify that you do want to do rank the assistants tomorrow.  As you know, ranking the assistants is not required, but is a business unit leader decision.

Thanks,
Anne Labbe'


459812
459813
mike s
broker has 50 mw

459787
mike s
broker has us selling


You received this e-mail because you registered on the E*TRADE Web site, or
on one of our partners' sites. If you do not want to receive partner e-mail
offers, or any E*TRADE marketing e-mail, you can change your preferences now.
You are subscribed at: kruscit@ect.enron.com

?
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
E*TRADE Partner Offers?
Special Offers for Empowered Investors?

Dear Kevin,
?
Dell

Dell

Intel
Dellhost.com

Dedicated
Shared
Servers

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]Enhanced
dedicated hosting
Starting at
$549/month.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]Shared
website hosting
Starting at
$17.95/month
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]Dell(tm) PowerEdge(tm)
300 Servers
Starting at
only $999!

[IMAGE]

Pricing, specifications and availability may change without notice. Taxes and
shipping charges are extra, and vary. U.S. only. Dell, the Dell logo,
DellHost and PowerEdge are trademarks of Dell Computer Corporation. The Intel
Inside Pentium III Processor logo is a registered trademark of Intel
Corporation.
Copyright 2000 Dell Computer Corporation. U.S. only.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

	E*TRADE and the E*TRADE logo are registered trademarks of E*TRADE Group,
	Inc. or its subsidiaries. All other trademarks mentioned herein are the
	property of their respective owners. All rights reserved.

	?

	Although we are sending this e-mail to you, E*TRADE is not responsible for
the advertisers' content and makes no warranties or guarantees about the
products or services advertised. E*TRADE takes your privacy seriously. To
learn more about E*TRADE's use of personal information, please read our
Privacy Policy. If you do not want to receive further mailings from E*TRADE,
unsubscribe now. If you have previously unsubscribed from E*TRADE's e-mail
list, but have received this mailing, please note that it takes approximately
five business days to process your request.

[IMAGE]