RBowers@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

In its Order on Rehearing issued by FERC in Docket ER00-1969-002 on
November 8, 2001, the Commission directed the NYISO to re-calculate
operating reserve charges for March 2000 within 15 days.

The  NYISO  initiated  the  rebilling of March 2000 settlements through the
settlement  adjustment  process  on  the  afternoon  of  November 21, 2001.
Advisory  billing  statements  have  been posting to customer web locations
since  midnight November 22, 2001.  The NYISO anticipates completion of the
March 2000 settlement adjustment at approximately 18:00, November 23, 2001.
Posting  of  advisory billing statements will continue through the evening,
but should complete by 23:00.  Invoices are scheduled to be posted for this
settlement adjustment on, or about, December 7, 2001.

Regards,
Randy A. Bowers
Manager - Customer Settlements

----- Forwarded by Randy Bowers/NYISO on 11/23/01 09:37 AM -----

                    Randy Bowers
                                         To:     nyiso_cset@lists.nyiso.com, TIE List Server
                    11/19/01 11:41       cc:
                    AM                   Subject:     FERC ruling on March 2000 Operating Reserves

In  its  Order  on  Rehearing  issued  by  FERC  in Docket ER00-1969-002 on
November 8, 2001, the Commission rejected the NYISO's request for rehearing
to  continue  to  bill for operating reserves based on the $2.52 bid cap in
effect  for  the period March 1 through March 27, 2000.  FERC also directed
the NYISO to re-calculate operating reserve charges for that period without
the bid cap in place.

On Friday, November 16, 2001, the NYISO filed a stay/extension with FERC in
order  to postpone any re-billing pending an appeal of the FERC decision in
the  Federal Appeals Court. In the event that FERC does not act in a timely
manner   on  the  NYISO's  request,  the  upcoming  March  2000  settlement
adjustment,  expected  to  be  issued  on  or  about December 7, 2001, will
reflect  this  re-calculation in accordance with the FERC Order.  The total
amount  of  this  adjustment  is  approximately  $27 million, which will be
allocated  to the appropriate suppliers and LSE's for the period of March 1
through March 27, 2000.

Regards,
Randy A. Bowers
Manager - Customer Settlements


Please see attached the July first of the month prices corresponding to the
deal list you provided me.  Sorry for the delay, but I.T. ran into a major
snag when they tried to pull these.

Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin -- X5-8274

GDP-CAL BORDER    4.91
GDP-CGT/APPALAC   4.52
GDP-CHI. GATE  4.43
GDP-CNG/APPALACH  4.56
GDP-HEHUB   4.36
GDP-ELPO/PERM2  4.35
GDP-ELPO/SANJUA  4.12
GDP-HPL/SHPCH  4.38
GDP-KERN/OPAL  3.92
GDP-MALIN-CTYGA  4.47
GDP-MICHCON   4.45
GDP-NTHWST/CANB  4.07
GDP-PAN/TX/OK  4.20
GDP-PG&E/CITIGA  4.97
GDP-TENN/500  4.24
GDP-TRCOZ6/NY  4.93
GDP-TETCO/M3  4.72
GDP-WAHA   4.27
NW STANF/1ST-GD  4.02


Scott:
Regarding the NOV issues, please refer to DealBench document 02.05.06.02 A,
which will have the correspondance letters regarding these issues.  Please
give me a call if you have any additional questions. Thanks!
Regards,
Ben Rogers
(713) 853-7998


No wonder you couldn't find it!  Keep looking, 'cause I guess when you can
see it, the job will be open outside Enron.  Didn't you think the job sounded
perfect!

	"Patti Young" <pyoung@pdq.net>
	05/16/2000 10:50 AM

		 To: "Tana Jones" <tana.jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fw: Job ID #0000103876 SR ADMIN ASST/EVENT COORD

Tana, have a look at this.  I am glad she responded.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Gail.Francis@enron.com>
To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2000 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: Job ID #0000103876 SR ADMIN ASST/EVENT COORD

Hi Patti !  Thank you for your interest in this position.  However, at this
time, this position is posted for internal candidates only.  If and when it
becomes open to external candidates,  I would be more than happy to
consider you.  However,  you will need to re-submit  a resume for
consideration.

Thanks again,
Gail

"Patti Young" <pyoung@pdq.net> on 05/12/2000 11:12:38 AM

To:   <Gail.Francis@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Job ID #0000103876 SR ADMIN ASST/EVENT COORD

PATTI YOUNG

                                4433 Verone

                            Bellaire, TX 77401

                            Home: 713/665-6171

CAREER OBJECTIVE: A challenging position with a growing organization that
utilizes my organizational and result-oriented expertise.

EXPERIENCE:

07/86-Present Clive Runnells

dba Clive Runnells
Enterprises

Mr. Runnells is an independent investor/rancher whose business interests
are varied: cable television, ranching, cattle feedlots, and real estate.
He contributes extensively to various charitable organizations, political
groups, and individual politicians. In addition, he is a board member of
both local and national organizations. My responsibilities for the past 13
years have included all aspects of business, civic and personal agendas.

Executive Assistant

? Coordinate, meet and maintain relationships with businesses,
public charities, politicians, political groups, local and national
organizations

? Maintain correspondence regarding support of business relations,
public charities, politicians, political groups, local and national
organizations

? Prepare and maintain spreadsheets for annual charitable and
political donations and fundraising activities

? Assist in performing administrative duties for fundraising events,
maintaining up to date client data, interacting with all levels of
management, working within limited amounts of time

? Maintain correspondence for personal family business and
foundation affairs

? Manage other family members personal, business and foundation
affairs

? Schedule business and personal appointments and travel plans

? Resolve payment and billing disputes with vendors as well as
collections

? Handled processing and recording of purchases and sales of stock
and options

? Prepared leases for rental properties

? Maintained corporate records

? Prepared board meeting agendas and minutes

? Participated in screening and interviewing candidates for
receptionist position

EDUCATION: B. S., 1974, Baylor University

COMPUTER SKILLS: Microsoft Word; WordPerfect; Excel; Lotus 1-2-3

VOLUNTEER WORK: Houston Area Women's Center, Houston Livestock
Show & Rodeo,

Bellaire Garden Club

May 12, 2000

Ms. Gail Francis

Enron Corporation

1400 Smith

Houston, TX 77002

Dear Ms. Francis:

Thank you for accepting my resume via e-mail for Job ID #0000103876.

Even though I am not called an 'Event Coordinator', so many of the duties I
perform require the same qualifications that are essential to the position
for which I am applying. My ability to learn quickly, apply good
problem-solving skills and work with minimal supervision could definitely
benefit Enron Energy Services Account Management Department.

I welcome a confidential call from your company. My office number is
713/627-2390.

Thank you.

Very sincerely,

Patti Young


All,  A fix to prevent the occurrence of deals not bridging to Sitara from EOL when deal start and end dates were not entered on EOL has been installed and tested.THANKS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:22 PM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara; Truong, Dat; Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Subject:	Request for Migration of Sitara EOLBridge into Production

Hello Zhiyong,
	I have implemented an enhancement to avoid the problem of restarting the Sitara EOLBridge when there are missing startdate and enddate.  This fix will take care of this morning's problem.

EOL will be sent a Failed status similar to the following:
	message={EolTransactionId=2101638 TransactionSysDealId="" BridgeEntityName="EOLBridge" Message="Missing StartDate or EndDate" Status="F" BridgeDate="20011025170945CDT"}

I throughly tested the change by sending over 400 sample deals from this morning.  Due to the "Bid Week" window, please approve this  bridge enhancement for tonight's migration.  Thank you.

-Dat Truong x63015

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:11 AM
To:	Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara
Subject:	Sitara EOL Bridge Problem Today

The problem we faced today was due to 2 eol deal packets (2098073, 2099764) not having startdate and enddate.  Missing these 2 tibco message fields caused the bridge to bounce and resulted in the queue to build up while the bridge is starting up. (The bridge takes 2 minute for startup).  Each time these deals are sent/resent, it continuously cause the Sitarar EOLBridge to restart, thus magnifying the buildup of the queue.

The corrective action we are taking at our end is to build a rejection logic when eol packets do not have start and/or enddate.

-Dat Truong


Stephanie,

We have some East Power traders changing desks effective Monday, May 21.  Can
you please create new EOL IDs for them on their new desks as follows:

Mike Carson:  EPMI-LT-SPP
Jeff King:  EPMI-LT-SERC
Matt Lorenz:  EPMI-ST-MAIN

Thanks.
Casey


We need to protect the flows to Citizens on TW.  I know you guys have been working on this, but Citizens continues to receive cuts.  Please secure the supply off of TW.  Let Sempra know that IB Link gas will not do.

Thanks,
Mike


Shirley:

Thank you very much for the e-mail. Attached please
find the copy of my resume, please treat it with high
confidentiality.

I would love to fly to Houston this Friday to talk to
Vince and other people in Enron, and I will fly from
Tulsa, Oklahoma to Houston. When you make the flight
reservation, please make sure to use my legal name
"Yingquan Shen".

If you have any questions, please feel free to let me
know.

sincerely,
Charles

--- Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com wrote:
> Mr. Shen:
>
> Vince Kaminski and the Research Group would like to
> bring you in for an
> interview this Friday, if possible.  Please forward
> me a copy of your
> resume, as soon as possible, and I will have our HR
> dept. contact you.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Shirley Crenshaw
> Administrative Coordinator
> Enron Research Dept.
> 713/853-5290
>
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
 - Charles_Shen.doc


Mary Hain has resigned her position with Enron.  Please remove her from all
your mail lists.

Thank you.

Lysa Akin
Gov't Affairs - Sr. Admin. Ass't.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Steve Marshall <marss@perkins.com>
03/23/2001 02:18 PM

Please respond to marss@perkins.com
To: abuckley@wutc.wa.gov, alan@epud.org, ali.rodol@ci.seattle.wa.us,
archive-power-ratecase@bpa.gov, aw_turner@pgn.com, BASSL@sce.com,
bessex@cowlitzpud.org, bferranti@mbllp.com, bpadiscovery@merkellaw.com,
ccopatrny@e-z.net, crow@millernash.com, cub@teleport.com, cwagers@dcpud.org,
dan.meek@usa.net, darcy@tonkon.com, darkills@popud.com, dbkinnard@pplmt.com,
dfaulk@puget.com, discoveryparalegal@bpa.gov, dldorrell@stoel.com,
dmacgregor@morganlewis.com, doney@doneylaw.com, doug_brawley@pngc.com,
dparrish@prmllp.com, dws@keywaycorp.com, eauverde@hotmail.com,
eboyd@ppcpdx.org, efinklea@energyadvocates.com, elisaCKF@aol.com,
EnerGlaw@aol.com, Eric.Larson@oremetwahchang.com, erick_johnson@pngc.com,
ghuhta@cowlitzpud.org, huse@eesconsulting.com, ias@dvclaw.com,
jack.speer@alcoa.com, jacksonc@ida.net, janet.prewitt@state.or.us,
jdeason@chbh.com, jeffn@subutil.com, jhartso@enron.com, JLH@mc-power.com,
johk@critfc.org, john.yanov@eweb.eugene.or.us, johncameron@dwt.com,
jolynnr@mresearch.com, jpw@duncanallen.com, jrb_ora@televar.com,
jsaven@pacifier.com, jschlect@avistacorp.com, kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us,
kknitte@gcpud.org, kmoxness@cencoast.com, kpom@mail.pacifier.com,
kyle@ppcpdx.org, lawyer@teleport.com, Lhamilton@avistaenergy.com,
lpeters@pacifier.com, lwolv@worldaccessnet.com, lyn_williams@pgn.com,
marc.hellman@state.or.us, marss@perkinscoie.com, matts1@atg.wa.gov,
mershanlaw@aol.com, mhain@ect.enron.com, michaelearly@earthlink.net,
mike.macdougall@powerex.com, mmetzler@ci.tacoma.wa.us,
mschaff@worldnet.att.net, mthomas@mtpower.com, Paul@KinergyLLC.com,
pete.forsyth@kaiseral.com, pete@ashland.or.us, peter@richardsonandoleary.com,
pfox@bracepatt.com, pljacklin@stoel.com, pmurphy@mbllp.com,
pnichols@idahopower.com, pobenchain@idahopower.com, pspi@dynegy.com,
pvickery@tpud.org, rachel@rnp.org, ratecase@pngc.com, rates@ppcpdx.org,
rbstrong@painehamblen.com, rdb@keywaycorp.com, rfoiani@gcpud.org,
rkindley@schwabe.com, rle@givenspursley.com, rpierce@avistaenergy.com,
scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com, seligman@teleport.com, simonf@atg.wa.gov,
sjohnsto@wutc.wa.gov, skaravit@ci.tacoma.wa.us, stephens@eslerstephens.com,
steve@nwenergy.org, tdeboer@painehamblen.com, terrym@millcreeklaw.com,
tgrim@chbh.com, townsend@chbh.com, tracigrundon@dwt.com,
tstevenson@ci.burbank.ca.us, weavertr@yakima-wa.com, wmgt3@montana.com
cc:
Subject: WP-02 Data Response

request_number:  DS-PS:001-003
firstname:  Steve
lastname:  Marshall
e-mail:  marss@perkins.com
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JCG01 and 02
page_numbers:
request_text:  DS-PS:001 Please disclose and/or produce copies of any and all
communications, from October 16, 2000 to the present, between any BPA
representative and any representative of any other party, concerning any of
the following subjects:

a. The general structure of the Cost Recovery Adjustment Clauses (CRACs)
described in the testimony of the Joint Customers;

b. Any differences between the form of the CRACs described in the testimony
of the Joint Customers and the CRACs contained in BPA's Amended Proposal, or
those contained in BPA's Supplemental Proposal;

c. The detailed mechanics of implementing the CRACs described in the
testimony of the Joint Customers;

d. Revenue effects of the CRACs described in the testimony of the Joint
Customers, any modifications; or

e. Any aspect of the Partial Stipulation and Settlement Agreement and the
Parties' Proposal attached thereto.

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

 With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, "disclose
and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce" any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

DS-PS:002:  Please disclose and/or produce any and all communications from
October 16, 2000 to the present, between the BPA representatives listed below
and any representative of any other party concerning BPA's rates to be in
effect for Fiscal Years 2002-2006, the interactions of such rates and
customer contracts, or procedural aspects of these rate proceedings.

Bob Proctor
Tim McCoy
Byrne Lovell
Byron Keep
Valerie Lefler
Jon Wright
Peter Berger

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

 With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, "disclose
and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce" any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

DS-PS:003:  Please disclose and/or produce any and all communications from
October 16, 2001 to the present, between any of the party representatives
listed below and any representative of BPA concerning rates to be in effect
for BPA's Fiscal Years 2002-2006, the interactions of such rates and customer
contracts, or procedural aspects of rate these proceedings.

Terry Mundorf (WPAG)
Lon Peters (PGP)
Linc Wolverton (ICNU)
Scott Brattebo (PacifiCorp)
Kevin Clark (Seattle City Light)
David Hoff (PSE)
Geoff Carr (Northwest Requirements Utilities)
Dennis Parrish (Market Access Coalition Group)
Pam Jacklin (PacifiCorp)
Peter Richardson (PPC)
Kyle Sciuchetti (PPC)
Ray Kindley (PGP)
Jay Waldron (PGP)
Doug Brawley (PNGC)
Eric Johnson (PNGC)
Darcy Norville (PGE)
Lynn Williams (PGE)
Steve Weiss (Northwest Energy Coalition)
Mark Hellman (OPUC)

 For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, "disclose
and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce" any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

response_text:  DS-PS:001:  PSE refers to and incorporates the response from
PacifiCorp, including the following objection to the data request, as follows:

"PacifiCorp objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it (1) seeks
information that is not relevant and (2) seeks information that is unduly
burdensome to produce.  (Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section
1010.8(b).)  PacifiCorp further objects to this Data Request on the grounds
that it is in improper form, as it does not cite to specific testimony or
indicate the specific use to which to information sought will be put.
(Special Rules of Practice, WP-02-O-01.)  Without waiving the foregoing
objections, we respond as follows in the below attached exhibits:

For oral communications, see Exhibit 1.

For written communications, see Exhibit 2."

DS-PS:002:  PSE refers to and incorporates
the response from PacifiCorp, including the following objection to the data
request, as follows:

"PacifiCorp objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it (1) seeks
information that is not relevant and (2) seeks information that is unduly
burdensome to produce.  (Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section
1010.8(b).)  PacifiCorp further objects to this Data Request on the grounds
that it is in improper form, as it does not cite to specific testimony or
indicate the specific use to which to information sought will be put.
(Special Rules of Practice, WP-02-O-01.)  Without waiving the foregoing
objections, we respond as follows in the below attached exhibits:

For oral communications, see Exhibit 1.

For written communications, see Exhibit 2."

DS-PS:003:
PSE refers to and incorporates the response from PacifiCorp, including the
following objection to the data request, as follows:

"PacifiCorp objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it (1) seeks
information that is not relevant and (2) seeks information that is unduly
burdensome to produce.  (Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section
1010.8(b).)  PacifiCorp further objects to this Data Request on the grounds
that it is in improper form, as it does not cite to specific testimony or
indicate the specific use to which to information sought will be put.
(Special Rules of Practice, WP-02-O-01.)  Without waiving the foregoing
objections, we respond as follows in the below attached exhibits:

For oral communications, see Exhibit 1.

For written communications, see Exhibit 2."

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  perkinscoie.com
3.  Remote IP Address:  207.109.65.66
4.  Form URL:
https://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT)


Gale, here is the information that I have available about the subject interconnect.  The actual project is to install an additional tap and measuring facilities at the end of the lateral for peak deliveries of 12-15 MMcfd to ENA for power generating.  The problem is that the lateral capacity is about 25-27 MMcfd based upon turbine meter capacity for the Citizens Flagstaff point, but Citizens has about 25 MMcfd scheduled at their three points on the west end.  Their contract allows for them to take full obligations at either point (Kevin is checking on this); however, I don't believe that their flow regulation at the Flagstaff point (two-2" regulators) can do more than 15 MMcfd (my intuitive guess, needs to be checked or verified).  Pressure - TW may be between 725-775 psig at peak TW mainline flows to Ca., Citizens pressure is reported to be around 365 psig downstream of control valves.

The greatest daily volume (MN 9213) since Jan 2000 was 11942 Mcf on Jan. 18, 2001 (as can be seen in the attached Excel worksheet extracted from MIPS meas. data).  The flow graph on Jan 18, 2001 also obtained from MIPS is shown below:

Planning Question: if Citizens meter capacity is say 15 MMcfd at some pressure, can we subscribe the remaining lateral capacity to ENA and still maintain pressure and volume obligations to either Citizens or ENA?  What would new pressure conditions look like flowing 30 MMcfd through the lateral?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Eric Faucheaux
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 7:43 PM
To:	Eric Faucheaux
Subject:	Citizens Flagstaff Interconnect

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Faucheaux/ET&S/Enron on 05/31/2001 02:40 PM ---------------------------

	  From:  David Roensch                           05/16/2001 01:25 PM

To:	Eric Faucheaux/ET&S/Enron, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron <mailto:Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron>
cc:

Subject:	Citizens Flagstaff Interconnect

Eric, I'm going to try an provide the info requested this morning.  This will at the very least be a starting point for our discussions.

The following are the details as I understand it:
The Citizens Flagstaff Interconnect is one of three Interconnect points with Citizens that gas is nominated to on a daily basis.  One daily nom is made by Citizens that covers all three interconnect points.  The other two interconnect points are Citizens F89A interconnect (In Flagstaff) and the Citizens Kingman TBS interconnect.  (two points in Flagstaff and one in Kingman)  Again, one nomination is made covering Citizens at all three points.  The total nomination is not to exceed 25 mmcfd.  This 25 mmcfd can be split between all three points or taken as a total at any one point.   (I hope that made sense)  So, with that said, as I understand it, we must maintain the ability to provide 25 mmcfd at the Citizens Flagstaff point of delivery.

We have approximately 7 miles of 6" lateral from Transwesterns 30" mainline feeding this interconnect.  Once at the metering station we have a 4" auto adjust turbine meter which is limited on flowing capacity based of inlet pressure to some degree.  (See chart below)  Please see drawing (Flagstaff 6" Lateral  ICCU-AB-A1-01) for details of meter station yard and piping.  Once the gas flows out of the 4" turbine meter we discharge into a line heater that Transwestern owns.  Immediately on the discharge side of the line heater, Citizens piping begins.  Citizens has 2 ea., 2" regulator runs that control pressure into their City mainline.  (Again please refer to the drawing number listed above for detail)

I know that pressure profiles in Section 3 will change after Red Rock so I would not dare to guess what the supply pressure to the 6" Lateral would be but, System Ops should be able to provide this info on a best/worst case senario both pre and post Red Rock.  (Assumptions would have to allow for a unit down at Station 2 & 3, I would assume)

Flow Capacity Info for a 4" Auto Adjust Turbine Meter:

Pressure               Max Flow Rate
600#                                  19,920 mscfd
700#                                  23,540 mscfd
800#                                  27,310 mscfd
900#                                  31,200 mscfd
The flowing capacity between the various pressures can be interpolated

I hope this answered some of your questions.  It might be a good idea to have a quick conference call with representatives from Planning, System Ops, Marketing, Engineering and Operations to discuss the details........

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Faucheaux/ET&S/Enron on 05/31/2001 02:40 PM ---------------------------

Team Flagstaff
05/31/2001 11:51 AM
To:	Eric Faucheaux/ET&S/Enron@Enron <mailto:Faucheaux/ET&S/Enron@Enron>, Eric.Faucheaux@enron.com <mailto:Eric.Faucheaux@enron.com>
cc:	David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@Enron <mailto:Roensch/ET&S/Enron@Enron>, Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron <mailto:Jolly/ET&S/Enron@Enron>

Subject:	Flagstaff 66 meter station name plate data from C.U. Meter runs

Answers to Questions: 1. Runs operate Balanced not cascaded
                                               2. Downstream pressure of runs 365 PSIG,  TW inlet pressure of 855 PSIG
                                               3. Regulators operate in Parallel

First reg run has the following info on name plate (two Reg on this run)
Mooney Controls - Salt Lake City, Utah
Flowgrid,  Serial number 8853.  Second Req on this same run has Serial number of 8852
no. ports 1
Size/End Conn 2 in. FLGLS LP
Ansi CL 600
Max inlet pressure 1480
Min. Diff 10
Max. Diff 800
Max. Degrees F Temp 175
Bolt Torq. Ft Lbs 60
More info at: http://www.mooneycontrols.com/pilots/67.html

Next run has the following info on name plate.
Grove FlexFlo
Model 900TE
Figure 11559 H2AKR
Tube 740
Pressure 1440 PSI,  100 Bar
Temp 0/200 Degrees F          -18/93 degrees C
Grove Valve & Regulator
6529 Hollis St.
Oakland, California  94608
More info at: http://www.grove.it/regulators.htm

If you need more information please give us a call we'll be glad to help.
Glenn Hawthorne
Flagstaff team  520-774-1547      X110


Here is your conversation with my revisions marked (deletions struck through,
insertions in bold).  Hope this helps but feel free to call or write with any
questions or comments:

A:   The CFTC regulates futures contracts and certain kinds of option
contracts.
SP:  What's a futures contract?
A:  It is a contract for the sale of a certain kind of  commodity through a
regulated  exchange.
SP:  How is the contract different than a non-futures contract?
A:  Ahem,   just for your information, we call the non-futures contracts
forward or over the counter contracts.  The big difference is that the
forward contract does not must go to delivery while futures contracts do not.
SP:  I though the futures contracts went to delivery.  I remember getting all
messed up on the gas side with delivery of NYMEX futures gas at the Henry
Hub, and what about those stories of a guys getting a load of soy beans
dumped in their front yards?
A:  Well, er,  yes they do sometimes  go to delivery, but they are not really
supposed to relatively few of them go to delivery.  They are supposed to
more frequently (actually the vast majority of the time) net out as financial
transactions.  It's that option of settling financially that distinguishes
the futures contract.
SP:  Well lets get to the point,  why are physical buy sells so bad?
A:  That's easy.  Because they look like futures contracts.  They are not
intended to go to delivery.  And if you are trading in futures contracts you
are supposed to be doing it on a CFTC regulated exchange.
SP:  So what you are saying is that if we deliberately net out our physical
deals and never intend to even try to schedule delivery under them we are
trading in futures contracts and could be subject to regulation by the CFTC?
A:  You've got it.  But it's even worse than that - federal law says that a
futures contract which is not traded on a regulated exchange is illegal: not
only could the CFTC come after you but your counterparties could use that law
against you to get out of performing.  So you can think of each contract like
that as having written a free option.
SP:  Well how much physicality do we have to have to make it a forward
contract?
A:  What do you mean?
SP:  Well, if we settled physically one day a month but financially the other
29 days, would we have a futures contract?
A:  Oh for Christ's sake I've had it.   I'm telling you once and for all that
physical buy sells are futures contracts and you can't do them now get the
hell out of my office!--

Is this the basic idea and if so,  how much can we blend physical into it to
cross the line into the domain of the forward contract?  --Christian

Basically, yes.  A lot has to do with the look and feel of the thing but also
the parties' intentions.  If we do not intend to make and take delivery, if
we intend to settle financially - or even intend to just have the option to
settle financially, we have a problem.  The closest thing we have to an
exception to this is the provision for cover damages when one party fails to
deliver.  That is a provision in the contract that might be argued gives one
party the right to settle financially just by failing to perform.  We argue
that this is still a forward and not a future because the parties in good
faith intend initially that delivery will be made and a default occurs when
there is a failure to make or take delivery.  Unfortunately, in the power
world a large percentage of contracts may in fact get booked out.  However,
each party enters into those contracts knowing that they have an obligation
to make or take delivery and the book-outs may or may not happen - we do not
enter into those contracts knowing that they will be booked out.  The
book-outs occur after the fact by mutual agreement at the time of the
book-out.  In fact, if we didn't want to book them out, we could stand on our
legal rights and require all of our counterparties to make and take delivery
(although I assume this might not go over well with many of them or with our
scheduling desk if a book-out would be more convenient at the time).


Kim-
Here is the August spreadsheet.  These are the changes I've made so far:

I changed the formula in column R
I added in the new contracts for August

The differences between my model and the invoice are the way that they calculate the actual gas flow to Malin (column L on mine and column Z on theirs);

It also appears that they do not include the Redwood credit.

Looking at my model now, I also don't remember what the calculation in column D is for.  It seems kind of unnecessary to me and doesn't make much sense.

I know this is a lot of stuff to look at.  If you don't understand what I just wrote, ask me and I'll explain what I'm trying to say.
Thanks,
Mara


thanks fellas.  i will cover the $510.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 07:56 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           05/15/2000 07:56 AM

To: Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: GAME TONIGHT @ 9:45

 Let me know whether or not you will be there.  Please try to make it by 9:15.


CalPX Told To Release Confidential Trade Data To State

09/22/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones&Company, Inc.)
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- California's Electricity Oversight Board has
ordered the state's Power Exchange to hand over confidential information to
the board regarding the trading activities of utilities, generation companies
and other market participants who traded power at the exchange since June,
according to a copy of a subpoena obtained by Dow Jones Newswires.
The subpoena marks the first time the state will gain access and learn how
each company traded power in the day-of, day-ahead and block forward markets.
Moreover, the EOB subpoena requests the CalPX release the names of the
participants who traded power at the exchange since June to better understand
how and why the participants conduct business in the various markets at the
exchange.
The CalPX has until Wednesday to hand over "aggregate supply and demand
curves, individual firm bid dates, final schedules for each firm by
generating unit, injection point and take out point," from June 1 through
September and continue supplying trading data through Nov. 1.
In addition, the subpoena requests "block forward trade positions by firm for
June, July, August and September" and that this information continue to be
supplied through October and November.
The subpoena is part of the state's ongoing investigation into California's
troubled deregulated electricity market, which has resulted in high wholesale
power prices in San Diego, landmark legislative action and accusations of
collusion, price gouging and market power. Gov. Gray Davis ordered an
investigation in June, when power prices soared to near record levels and
rolling blackouts wreaked havoc in the Bay Area.
The CalPX said it will comply with the EOB request and that a subpoena to
access the confidential information is required according to the rules of the
exchange. But the EOB will be required to protect the confidentiality of each
trade it gains insight into as well as the identities of the participants who
traded.
If the trading activities of a company or other participant is leaked or
becomes public it could have a devastating affect on the company and the EOB
would be held liable, according to the CalPX.
The CalPX said it must notify each and every participant who traded power in
its various markets to alert them of the EOB subpoena.
-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Retail Wheeling
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 53

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

Kay - one question - what is the "GC"?
Thanks
Isabel

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 3:55 PM
To: gregorylang@paulhastings.com; isabel.parker@freshfields.com
Cc: ccampbell@kslaw.com; kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
Subject: GE guaranty, opinion of counsel and letter of credit

In conversations with GE, it is their understanding that their guaranty
will not be transmitted until there is a fed ref number tomorrow.  The
opinion letter will be faxed as soon as the GC is available, or Kent can
sign for Dan Rowley if that is acceptable.  DRowley can sign originals on
Thursday.

The LOC is in the works, and GE understands that 10% will be retained in
escrow until the LOC is delivered.

There will be three original opinions.  There is one original guaranty, and
I'm not certain of GE's willingness to give more than that.  Obviously,
there will be only one LOC.

Kay


Jean has responded to Rick and I.  She doesn't feel that she has room in her
budget to pick up a partial headcount.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/14/2001 02:33 PM -----

	Elyse Kalmans
	02/08/2001 03:59 PM

		 To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Revised Plan

Cindy and Steve:  Please see Kathy Mayfield's split responsibility proposal.
She initially discussed it with Jean Ryall at the beginning of January just
prior to the start of the legislative session.  Unfortunately, Jean has not
responded to Kathy's numerous inquiries.  As you can see, Community Relations
can use Kathy for United Way, but that will account for only 40% of her time,
with 60% designated for legislative/economic development activities under
Jean.  Please let me know your thoughts on how to proceed.  I am nervous
about a full-time role for Kathy should Jean not be interested in supporting
these activities and want to make sure that her talents are optimized for
Enron.

Elyse
---------------------- Forwarded by Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron on 02/08/2001
03:47 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kathy Mayfield                           02/08/2001 03:43 PM

To: Elyse Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Revised Plan

Elyse, these are the dates that I communicated to Jean--just fyi.  Thanks,
Kathy

Met w/ Jean Ryall on Jan. 5
Sent proposal to Jean on Jan. 16
Follow-up email to Steve on Jan. 29
Follow-up email to Jean on Jan. 31
Numerous phone calls to Jean with no return calls  (actually, she called late
one night before the Inauguaration, but no response since then)


ok

-----Original Message-----
From: Millar, John
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:09 AM
To: McCarty, Danny; Wilkie, Kim
Subject: RE: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?

Dan,  I had drafted language which included both non-compete and right-to-match requirements for John's review.  John rejected the non-compete but accepted the right-to-match, which is ok with me.  I think the non-compete would be too much of an encumbrance and possibly a deal killer if we pushed for it.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: McCarty, Danny
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Wilkie, Kim; Millar, John
Subject: RE: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?

Kim and John,
     I assumed that we'd moved away from that point in favor of the right to match.  Is that not the case?
Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Wilkie, Kim
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:23 AM
To: McCarty, Danny; Millar, John
Subject: RE: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?

Dan, are we no longer requiring a covenant re: not using the ROW for gas pipeline activity?

Thanks, Kim

-----Original Message-----
From: McCarty, Danny
Sent: Tue 10/9/2001 9:04 AM
To: Wilkie, Kim; Millar, John
Cc:
Subject: RE: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?

Kim and John,
     I agree with Kim's second point.  I don't know how Ballentine's language works--there doesn't seem to be an offer and acceptance of anything specific.  I'd like to at least have a contract that has either been negotiated with the third party of the ability to negotiate it myself.  Can we clean this language up a little?

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Wilkie, Kim
Sent:   Monday, October 08, 2001 1:17 PM
To:     Millar, John
Cc:     McCarty, Danny
Subject:        RE: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?

Thanks John.  For your convenience in reviewing the language, I have attached a redline copy that shows the changes that John made to our original language.  Regarding his changes:

1.      A big omission in his new section is the covenant  not to construct or cause to be constructed a natural gas pipeline within the right of way.  I thought that was a covenant we wanted.  If that is not the business deal, then the change is fine.

2.      I think a 10 business days is fine.  That being said, you usually don't indicate an acceptance of a right to match with the payment of the purchase offer.  We could submit a binding acceptance but I don't think we want to agree to pay the purchase price when all that Ballentine may put in front of us is a term sheet with the specifics of the deal to be negotiated.  I also don't think we want to go to the trouble of escrowing the money.  Maybe we could do an earnest money deposit but then we need to add language as to when we get it back.  (If you and Danny want to keep the submission of the purchase price, we need to include the language as to when we get the money back as well.)  The easiest fix for this deal is just saying we will submit a binding acceptance to their offer.

Let me know your thoughts.  Kim

 << File: right to match ballentine red.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Millar, John
Sent:   Monday, October 08, 2001 11:32 AM
To:     Wilkie, Kim; McCarty, Danny
Subject:        FW: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?
Importance:     High

Here's John's response to the Right-to-Match language.  His client's main interest is in participating in the construction of new assets, which is the purpose of the last sentence.  This seems reasonable to me.  Dan suggested ten days response time, which John is agreeable to.  Please advise if we can work with this.

Kim, I believe I have the schedules, which I will fax to you for scanning.

Thanks,
John

 -----Original Message-----
From:   "John Ballentine" <jballentine@id3energy.com>@ENRON
Sent:   Monday, October 08, 2001 9:48 AM
To:     Millar, John
Subject:        RE: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?
Importance:     High

John- try this on for size...I haven't vetted it on my end yet, but see how
you feel about it:

Section 4.06  Right to Match.
Buyer agrees that within one year of the Date of this Agreement if it
receives a bona fide offer (the "Purchase Offer") to acquire the right to
construct or to place into service natural gas and/or liquid pipelines
within the Company's right-of-way, Buyer will first, by written notice to
Seller, offer to Seller the right to construct or to place into service
natural gas and/or liquid pipelines within the Company's right-of-way on the
same terms and conditions as the Purchase Offer (the "ROFR Offer").  The
written notice provided by Buyer shall state (i) that Buyer has received the
Purchase Offer and intends to accept such Purchase Offer and (ii) the terms
and conditions of the Purchase Offer.  Seller shall have five (5) business
days from receipt of the ROFR Offer to indicate its willingness to match the
Purchase Offer by submitting by wire transfer to Buyer's designated bank
account the Purchase Offer in immediately available funds..  If Seller does
not indicate its willingness to match the Purchase Offer or does not respond
within five (5) days, then Buyer may consummate the transaction with the
counterparty, provided that the transaction consummated with counterparty is
on the same terms and conditions set forth in the ROFR Offer.  If the
transaction with counterparty is modified in any respect from that set forth
in the ROFR Offer, the modified terms and conditions shall be deemed to
constitute a new Purchase Offer and Seller shall be entitled to a new right
to match the Purchase Offer as set forth above in this Section 4.06.  In the
event that Seller matches the Purchase Offer by submitting funds to Buyers
designated bank account, Seller shall assume all other terms and conditions
of the Purchase Offer, including, but not limited to, any limitations,
restrictions or preferences of the selection of the construction company or
any other contractors normally associated with the construction, operation
and maintenance of gas and liquid pipelines.

-----Original Message-----
From: Millar, John [ <mailto:John.Millar@ENRON.com>]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 7:33 AM
To: jballentine@id3energy.com
Subject: Agreement

 <<PSA v4 10-04-.doc>>

Hey John.  Kim sent me this new version over the weekend.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** <<
File: PSA v4 10-04-.doc >>

 - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>


Please see if you can get a conference room, allowing 2 hours for the meeting.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/15/2000 04:38
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           09/15/2000 04:36 PM

To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, nwodka@bracepatt.com
cc: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: VEPCO interconnection agreement

How does everybody look for a discussion concerning the VEPCO interconnection
agreement on Tuesday, Sept 19?

I've checked with Christi, Mitch and Reagan, so they don't need to confirm.

Details to follow...

Thanks,

Kay


We have reached the last ratchet at 67,371. In yesterday's meeting with TCO
pipeline, it was confirmed that we should call gas control direct
304-357-2606, when we true-up choice and the storage withdrawal exceeds the
67,371. Because of TCO's new stance of enforcing penalties, please write down
the date, time, and person you talk to at TCO to allow this.

I also bumped up 3/17's storage withdrawal to better match the end of month
target.

Thanks.

Joan Veselack
03/14/2000 12:07 PM
To: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT,
bperron@columbiaenergy.com, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Choice Storage Withdrawal - March 2000

Currently we are on target for March's total goal of 1,125,300 (36,300 x 31
days). So far we have 1,132,935 scheduled to be withdrawn. As we get into the
last week, we will teak the numbers to match as close as we can to the
1,125,300.

Because TCO is enforcing penalties a lot tougher, I want everyone to be aware
of the storage withdrawal ratchet levels.

As of 3/14, the maximum storage withdrawal equals 87,582 daily. The current
storage level remaining is 10.5 %

The next ratchet level is below 10% and will probably hit this on 3/16. The
maximum storage withdrawal will equal 67,371 daily.

That means the schedulers (Joann, Robert, and myself) need to watch these
levels when we do Choice and especially on the weekends.

Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Have you asked Rusty?  I believe Kathleen gave him a hard copy yesterday.  I
made the changes myself.

Fred Mitro@ECT
01/30/2001 09:25 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: SPA - PSEG Transaction

Kay:

What is the status of the draft Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of
ENA's Illinois project entities?

Please let me know.  Rusty and I need to review it before sending it out to
PSEG.

Thanks,
Fred


We are not testing all scripts today. The purpose of today's test is to verify that the test scripts contain all the steps needed for Sunday. On Sunday, we will run through all the test we developed this week.

Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Sanvido, Terry
Subject: RE: Estate Integration Test Dry Run - 1/10/2002

The attached scripts were not scheduled for.  Has there been a change I am not aware of?

Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin, X5-8274

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanvido, Terry
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:03 PM
To: Brackett, Debbie R.; Hare, Bill D.; Hayden, Frank; Jaquet, Tammy; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Moorer, Torrey; Rodriguez, Bernice; Sweitzer, Tara; Theriot, Kim S.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Dupuy, Mark; Gillis, Brian; Heal, Kevin; McKeel, Richard; Reeves, Kathy; Seib, Dianne; Vander velde, Nikole; Anderson, Diane; Bowen, Bob; Campos, Sylvia A.; Garcia, Clarissa; Hilliard, Marlene; Hunter, Larry Joe; Price, Wade R.; Richardson, Stacey; Schrab, Mark L.; Severson, Russ; Spears, Christopher; Sullivan, Patti; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wynne, Rita; Chitradurga, Sundar; Cinelli, Steve; Elwood, Richard; Franks, Shawn; Greig, Iain; Harmon, Kenneth M.; Hunter, Wade; Johnson, Jeff; Nolte, Ron; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Saleem, Aftab; Sanvido, Terry; Smith, Regan M.; Allen, Thresa A.; Aucoin, Evelyn; Bentley, Corry; Clemons, Amy; Dahlke, Andrea; Denton, Rhonda L.; Evans, Casey; Murphy, Melissa Ann; Robinson, Rhonda; Stevens, Mechelle
Subject: Estate Integration Test Dry Run - 1/10/2002

Everyone,

I have attached the preliminary schedule for tomorrow's test of the integration test scripts. For those individuals, who have been identified to participate in the test and are unable to attend at your scheduled time, please send me the name of your substitute as soon as possible. The current schedule allows plenty of time for each step. If the test is ahead of schedule, we may call you in at an earlier time.

Thank You,

Terry


-----Original Message-----
From: Murray, Paul
Sent: Mon 12/3/2001 7:33 AM
To: ken.lay@enron.com
Cc:
Subject: reporting to work on Monday

Ken,
Thank you for your email encouraging me to report to work today.  Unfortunately I am an employee of Enron Europe thus have already been fired.  The oversight that I  beleive PriceWaterhouseCoopers made in terminating my employment relates to the fact that, while I have created and managed a very successful portfolio of weather derivatives in the London office with a positive mark-to market, all trades were booked through ECTRIC and EFET which fall under Enron Corp.  My salary (and the salaries of my staff) are paid - and therefore the expense incurred- by EEL.  The oversight is that PwC should have recognized that I could have acted as agent for EEL and run off the portfolio thereby realizing positive cash to satisfy creditors of EEL.  It is too bad that we have administrators in London trying to handle a process of which they know absolutely nothing about.  Potential recovery for creditors -ignored.

Thank you

Paul Murray
(now in what is left of my London flat)
44-207-581-8251


Bernard,

It seems the msg has been truncated.

Vince

"Murphy, Bernard" <Bernard.Murphy@caminus.com> on 03/01/2001 08:47:25 AM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: 1997 Risk paper on Pricing of Electricity Derivatives

V

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: 01 March 2001 14:54
To: Murphy, Bernard
Cc: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com; Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: Re: 1997 Risk paper on Pricing of Electricity Derivatives

Bernard,

I am forwarding your message to my assistant and she will mail you a
reprint.
I would be glad to take a look at your dissertation. Is it available as a
publication, working paper?

Vince

"Murphy, Bernard" <Bernard.Murphy@caminus.com> on 03/01/2001 02:17:39 AM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  1997 Risk paper on Pricing of Electricity Derivatives

Hello Vince,

My name is Bernard Murphy - I received your e-mail address from Les
Clewlow,
who was my PhD supervisor at the Financia Options Research Centre at
Warwick
Business School.  I've just finished my PhD on Electricity Price Jump
Diffusions :  A Theoretical and Empirical Study in Incomplete Markets -
hence my interest in electricity price modelling and derivative pricing.  I
was looking to get hold of a copy of your 1997 paper, which has recently
come to my attention :

"The Challenge of Pricing & Risk-Managing Electricity Derivatives", The US
POwer Market, Risk Publications, pp. 149-171.

and Les suggested that I contact you directly (Les is travelling at present
and doesn't have an electronic copy available) to request an e-copy.

Incidentally, I am Lecturer in Finance / Financial Mathematics at
University
of Limerick (Ireland) and have taken a year out to work for Caminus UK,
where I am working on introducing and developing a markets-based approach
(spark-spread) to real asset valuations in the UK power industry.

Thanks in advancve

Bernard Murphy


Rick,

Nice kudos from Robert.

Would you mind keeping Diane Goode in the loop on this.  As you may recall, she had done a summary of the legal requirements and sent it on to the generalists.  They now are calling her for help, so her knowing what you are doing is essential.

Thanks.

Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 3:51 PM
To:	Johnson, Rick
Cc:	Butcher, Sharon; Sullivan, Kriste; Cash, Michelle; Hope, Valeria A.; Barnard, Marla; Chapman, Jon (London); Joyce, Mary; Oxley, David; Pieper, Kalen; Smith, Gary
Subject:	RE: Military leave issues - Policy Primer

Rick,

Great job of summarizing issues and developing recommendations!  I am in full support.

Thanks,

Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Rick
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:23 PM
To:	Barnard, Marla; Chapman, Jon (London); Joyce, Mary; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Oxley, David; Pieper, Kalen; Smith, Gary
Cc:	Butcher, Sharon; Sullivan, Kriste; Cash, Michelle; Hope, Valeria A.
Subject:	Military leave issues - Policy Primer
Importance:	High

Attachment provides a compilation of Enron's policy treatment and considerations in granting employees a leave of absence for military or emergency duty.  After leadership's validation, HR Risk Management would propose distributing this policy guidance to all US domestic HR Generalists.   Thank you for your review and comments.  Regards, Rj.

 << File: HR Policy Guidance-military leaves.doc >>


Chris - I will forward the article to the steel distribution (jeff already
has it).  I will distribute the steel study tomorrow when I receive it.

Thanks,
Lisa

	Chris Long
	04/30/2001 10:07 AM

		 To: Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wall St. Journal--

Lisa - Please get this to Jeff McMahon and the steel group.  Below are two
press reports on the CITAC (the coalition we joined to fight 201) study on
the effects of steel import quotas.  We will use this as a basis for lobbying
campaign over the next month.  I will send you a copy of the study overnight.
Thanks - Chris

Look on p. A8 of the Wall St.Journal.  Both articles are attached.

April 30, 2001   <<...>>
Economy
Consuming Group Attacks Effort
By Steelmakers to Curb Imports
By ROBERT GUY MATTHEWS
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
A grass-roots organization of consuming industries is mounting a campaign to
stop the steel industry's relentless push to sharply limit the amount of
cheap foreign steel allowed into the country, a move currently being
considered by President Bush.
Monday, the Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition (www.citac-trade.org
<http://www.citac-trade.org/> ) is expected to release a report that says
that five times as many jobs will be lost in steel-consuming industries as
would be saved in the steel-making industry if quotas are passed. The report
also says that import limits would drive up the costs of steel and force
steel users, such as those serving the household appliance, construction,
automobile, machinery and equipment industry to lay off workers and cut
production.
"The thing to think about here is to look at when Washington is protecting
the narrow interests of one industry, they don't always see the broader
perspective," said Jon Jensen, chairman of Citac.
But steelmakers and steel unions counter that the consuming industries have
long enjoyed a period of extremely low steel prices and that it is unfair to
expect the steel producers to continue to bear the brunt just to keep steel
costs low. Hot-rolled and cold-rolled steel, two of the most widely used
steel products, have seen their prices plunge to some of their lowest prices
in decades at the same time consuming industries have been able to increase
production, hire more employees and lower the costs of goods because of a
rapid fall in steel prices.
"We have in this country bad trade policy," says Leo Gerard, president of
the United Steelworkers of America. "Clearly there are groups that are
taking advantage of this unfair trade policy and we are mounting a campaign
to stop this abuse."
There has always been tension between the steel industry and the users of
steel, with each side wanting the other to be less demanding about prices
and supply. But the acrimony has increased in recent months as the steel
industry suffers through a long string of quarterly losses eroding market
share because of increased availability of foreign steel, which is often
cheaper and seemingly endless in supply. In the past two years, about 20
steelmakers have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy-court protection.
The steel industry has pushed for import quotas with its powerful steel
lobbyists in Washington. Elected officials from steel-producing states have
also turned up the heat for protections to the industry. The Bush
administration has indicated that it would support a three- to five-year
moratorium on foreign steel imports for many steel products that are
domestically made, if the steel industry agrees to consolidate and
reorganize in order to become more competitive both in the domestic and
international markets.
Feeling outpowered, the consuming industries, a loose band of mostly small,
nonunion companies, including Stamco Industries Inc. of Euclid, Ohio, and
All American Mfg. Co. of Los Angeles, formed Citac nearly two years ago to
push their agenda and show that there are more users of steel than makers of
steel. Absent from the group are big appliance makers and automotive
customers, although those customers too are against allowing additional
quotas on imports.
The report says that if the most drastic of several import quota plans were
to be implemented, about 3,700 steel jobs would be protected. But 19,000 to
32,000 jobs in the steel-consuming sectors would be lost. The report also
says that the average pay for these lost steel consuming jobs is about $17
an hour.
Keith Busse, chief executive officer of Steel Dynamics Inc., based in
Butler, Ind., criticized the report and the effort to keep additional import
quotas from becoming law. "It's ridiculous for these guys to want to
continue to see the domestic steel industry to suffer. We depend on each
other," he says.
Write to Robert Guy Matthews at robertguy.matthews@wsj.com
<mailto:robertguy.matthews@wsj.com>

 <<...>> Steel users assert quotas would cost jobs
By Nancy E. Kelly
WASHINGTON, April 30 -- Steel users struck a blow against agitated suppliers
seeking import restraints on foreign steel by funding a study on job losses
under several import policies.
The report concluded that quotas would result in three times as many
steel-consuming industry workers losing their jobs as would be protected in
steel manufacturing.
Funded by a foundation affiliate of the Consuming Industries Trade Action
Coalition (CITAC), "Costs to American Consuming Industries of Steel Quotas
and Taxes" was written by the Trade Partnership, a Washington research
group. CITAC members include a number of large steel consumers and
associations, including Caterpillar Inc., Toyota Motor Manufacturing North
America Inc., Nissan North America Inc., the American Wire Producers
Association, the International Association of Drilling Contractors, the
Precision Metalforming Association and the American Institute for
International Steel.
The 30-page report, to be formally unveiled at a Washington press conference
Monday, based its findings on a "state-of-the-art" econometric model to
determine the costs to steel-using industries and consumers if the Steel
Revitalization Act (H.R.808) were passed into law. The bill, backed by the
United Steelworkers union, includes an import rollback to an average of
levels between 1994 and 1997; an expansion of the $1-billion steel loan
guarantee program to $10 billion; a 1.5-percent tax on all steel sold in the
United States; and a grant incentive program for merged steel companies to
maintain employment levels. The model also was used to determine the sole
costs of quotas alone.
According to its findings:
* The steel bill would protect no more than 3,700 steel jobs in
contrast to a loss of between 19,000 and 32,000 jobs in steel-consuming
sectors.
* Quotas outlined in the bill would cost tax consumers $1.35 billion
to $2.89 billion annually, or $732,000 per job protected in the steel
industry.
* Quotas alone would result in two to three times as many workers in
steel-consuming industries losing their jobs as would be protected upstream
in the steel industry.
* Quotas alone would cost consumers from $1.33 billion to $2.34
billion annually, or as much as $565,000 per steel job protected.
Asked about the ultimate costs to consuming industries if the domestic steel
industry was substantially reduced, Laura M. Baughman, who authored the
study with Joseph F. Francois, said that CITAC wanted a healthy domestic
steel industry. "CITAC is not for putting the domestic steel industry out of
business, but they don't think import quotas are the answer," she said.
"Imports are not the problem--other things are the problem."
The study said that technology was driving the long-term change in the
industry while the steel ranks had been blaming other factors, including
imports. Asked why modern, efficient mini-mills like Nucor Corp. and Steel
Dynamics Inc. also were citing imports as the cause of severe pricing
declines, Baughman had no hard answer. "I find that very sad," she said.
"These are companies that understand the value of imports to the U.S.
economy and have relied on imports themselves for raw materials. I don't
know."
Baughman emphasized that the Trade Partnership had no political agenda and
defended the model as rigorous and not easily manipulated. "It's a model
that takes into account the entire economy and the effects on everything
from agriculture to banking in a change on steel imports, using basic input
and outputs," she said.


change in company name!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2001 04:34
PM ---------------------------
From: Carlos Ruiz/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/26/2001 04:33 PM
To: Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: currency trade confirmation

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Pat Rigey <PatRigey@daishowa.ca>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Pat+20Rigey+20+3CPatRigey+40daishowa+2Eca+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.
com]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 12:15 PM
To: Ruiz, Carlos
Cc: Barry Boucher; Gibson, Roy
Subject: RE: currency trade confirmation

Thank you for the response.  However, as originally instructed, the company
name used on the confirm should be Compagnie Papiers Stadacona, as this will
ultimately be the proper legal name for the operating entity.  There will be
no "de" in the name.

Also, you have confirmed that the settlement of the contracts will be via
the Citibank Toronto accounts, but who will trigger the settlement and
request the transfer of U.S. dollars to Bank of America.  Will this be done
by someone in Houston, will it be automatic, or will I need to request a
wire transfer to Bank of America to fulfill the settlement?

Thank you for your help.

Pat Rigey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ruiz, Carlos [SMTP:Carlos.Ruiz@ENRON.com]
> Sent: Thursday April 26, 2001 10:57 AM
> To: patrigey@daishowa.ca
> Cc: barryboucher@daishowa.ca
> Subject: currency trade confirmation
>
> Pat,
> I am attaching an email with the bank accounts for the settlement.
>
> Please review it and send me your comments
>
> Carlos
> >
> >
> > The information on the confirm executed (deal no. m439607) between EGM
> > and EIM needs a couple of changes.  Please make the counterparty:
> >
> >  Compagnie de papiers Stadacona
> >  Bay Wellington Tower - BCE Place
> >  181 Bay Street, Suite 1540, P.O. Box 822
> >  Toronto, Ontario, Canada
> >  M5J 2T3
> >
> > And the bank accounts should be
> >
> >
> > Account Name    Currency
> > Notes
> >
> > 2013883015 EIM Holdings, (Canada) Inc. US$  Primary
> > concentration & funding account
> >  Co# 1469   Receives US$ deposits from BoA
> > collections
> >     US$ collection
> >     Funds FX settlement for Can$
> >     Funding source for BNS US$ accounts
> >
> >
> > 2013883007 EIM Holdings, (Canada) Co. Can $  Can$
> > deposit account
> >  Co# 1469   Deposit Acct for FX purchases of
> > Can$
> >     Primary funding account for operations
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Bob Crane
> >
> >
> >
> >


Leslie:  Can you attend this meeting for me?  I will be in London.

Patti:  Can you get time and location for Leslie and let them know that she
will be there instead of me?  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001 10:14 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca Miles @ ENRON                           01/12/2001 10:28 AM

To: Melissa Allen/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT, Caroline
Lothian/LON/ECT@ECT, John Paskin/LON/ECT@ECT, Donald Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David O'Dell/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Biren Kumar/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Matthew Huddleston/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Frazier/HOU/EES@EES,
Greg Lewis/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Elise Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allen W
Ueckert/NA/Enron@Enron, Thao Nguyen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Gillespie/Corp/Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Britton/LON/ECT@ECT, Jo Ann Hill/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Elaine Schield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: ISC ORG LEADERSHIP, ISC ORG SOLUTION MANAGERS, Richard
Priska/NA/Enron@Enron, Margarite Cunningham/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allan
Sommer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Regina Karsolich/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Agenda for SAP Optimization Meeting -- Wednesday, Jan. 17

Attached is the agenda for the SAP Optimization Kick-Off meeting.  The
following handouts will be provided at the meeting:

ISC Organization Chart
ISC Solution Manager Bios
Template for business area 2001 SAP goals
Revised SLA
Copy of Remedy Report
Copy of Maximize Dashboard
Customer Relations presentation

Please feel free to contact Rich Priska (x56069) or me with any questions.
Please RSVP to Margarite Cunningham (x56130).

Thank you,
Rebecca
x56364


Yes please!
thanks,
Monika

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kristal, Yana
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Causholli, Monika
Subject:	RE:  2 things

Do you need $US v Euro, Yen?

Yana Kristal
Enron Industrial Markets
(713) 345-8497

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Causholli, Monika
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Kristal, Yana
Subject:	 2 things

Hello Yana,

 I have a request for you. I need to have the historicals for the Indonesian Rupiah vs. $US for the last 5 years.
 Also, I need your view on where is the US dollar directed let's say in the next 6 months.

Hope all is well,
Monika


Communication is one of Enron,s key values.   In our continuing effort to
increase communication with our customers, Enron Net Works is hosting a
Technology Showcase.  The purpose of this showcase is to keep you, our
customer, aware of the tools available to you today as well as plans for the
future.  Come see and hear about the future of(.  Laptops, Desktops,
Operating Systems, Messaging, and much more.

Date: Friday, May 19, 2000
Time: 10:00 - 2:00
Place: Enron Plaza

 Come join the fun and learn more about:

Demonstrations
? Hardware ) Laptops, Desktops, Printers, Scanners, Handhelds
? Windows 2000 ) Hear about Project GEM (The Global Enron Migration to
Windows 2000) First look at new workstation operating system.
? Messaging ) See the future of messaging including voice integration, faxing
ability, handheld integration, etc.
? Web Site ) Announcing the New Information Technology Web Site
? Remote Connectivity ) Get all your questions answered!
? SRRS ) See the future Security Recourse Request System in action!
? Pagenet Pagers ) Two way paging helps you stay in touch
? Houston Cellular ) Available choices

Information Booths
? Training ) Information on available classes.
? Resolution Center ) Come hear about the new name and mission of the Help
Desk
? Customer Care ) New Unit focusing on your satisfaction.  Surveys, Feedback,
etc.

Prizes (Must complete survey to be eligible for drawing.)
? Autographed Houston Aeros Hockey Stick and Puck
? Houston Astro Tickets
? Laptop case with wheels
? Shirts

So, mark your calendars and don,t forget to stop by and see your Information
Technology Team in Action!  We look forward to seeing you there!

Susan Lopez
Director, Customer Care
713-853-7947


Multiple IT systems are being affected by a virus outbreak in Houston.

home.enron.com
enpower is being affected (General SQL Error)
some Houston based Excel sheets not saving

We will keep you informed.

Dave Steiner


Here is the version with my modifications over Mike's version. Please feel
free
to make modifications/corrections.

Osman


around there


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042504.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred: -725.00 / Final: -724.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  TRADING_SC: DETM
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:   1.96 / Final:   1.93)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Julie,

Is the contract with Cokinos on deal 151669 valid for Feb and Mar 20000?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000
01:52 PM ---------------------------

Jackie Young
03/10/2000 10:39 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 98-6719 and 98-9676

Hi Daren,

Can you please check into whether or not the below deals for the above meters
can be rolled and extended?  If so, can you please perform this for me so
that Anita can set up an accounting arrangement for me?

98-6719  Sitara Deal #166989 Flow @ meter began on February 10th but the deal
is not effective until  February the 11th.
     No new deal # referenced and no evergreen flag.  This is on the
gathering (96026573) K which is the only
     K @ the meter.

98-9676  Sitara Deal #151669 Deal good from 1/1/00 - 1/31/00 but there is
flow for all of February 2000 with no K.  This is on the 215K      for 1/2000
production which is the only K @ the meter.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


---------------------- Forwarded by Lola Willis/Corp/Enron on 11/01/2000
10:05 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Laura Gutierrez @ ECT                           11/01/2000 09:56 AM

To: Laura Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Lola Willis/Corp/Enron)

Subject: when pumpkins drink too much..

> Subject:  when pumpkins drink too much..
>
>
>
>
>   <<PUMPKIN.jpg>>

 - PUMPKIN.jpg


is this on the calendar?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Kelly   On Behalf Of Rieker, Paula
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	Beck, Sally; Blachman, Jeremy; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael - COO London; Buchanan, Harold; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Cheek, Charles; Cline, Wade; Cox, David; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Donahue, Jeff; Elliott, Steve; Fallon, Jim; Frevert, Mark; Glisan, Ben; Hannon, Kevin; Hayslett, Rod; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Kean, Steven J.; Kimberly, Kelly; Kitchen, Louise; Koenig, Mark; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Leff, Dan; McCarty, Danny; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Metts, Mark; Muller, Mark S.; Olson, Cindy; Pickering, Mark; Piper, Greg; Scrimshaw, Matthew; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherrick, Jeffrey; Sherriff, John; Whalley, Greg
Cc:	Adams, Jennifer; Aden, Beverly; Armstrong, Julie; Blackwood, Connie; Bolen, Vivianna; Bourgeois-Galloway, Hilda; Burns, Jennifer; Butler, Alan; Campos, Kathy; Chapman, Kay; Davidson, Binky; Daw, Nicki; Dick, Sharon; Dodgen, Kathy; Dorsey, Joyce; Ferrari, Kerry; Fisher, Dolores; Fleming, Rosalee; Ford, Sue; Gadade, Mrudula; Harris, Stephanie J ; Hawkins, Linda; Hillis, Kimberly; Hinojosa, Esmeralda; Iannarone, Lauren; Joyce, Mary; Lawless, Michelle; Marshall, Lucy; Mcginnis, Stephanie; McMahon, Kathy; McVicker, Maureen; Paxton, Jana L.; Phillips, Cathy; Rapacioli, Marisa; Rijo, Leah; Schiller, Marsha; Schoppe, Tammie; Slade, Nikki; Spiller, Tina; Stark, Cindy; Sullo, Sharon E; Taylor, Liz; Urquhart, Lauren; Valdez, Christina; Valdez, Veronica; Valencia, Laura; Walker, Stacy; West, Terry; Westbrook, Sharron; Wright, Teresa
Subject:	Board of Directors Meeting - December 11, 2001
Importance:	High

Kelly M. Johnson
Executive Assistant
Enron Corp.
Tel: 713-853-6485
Fax: 713-853-2534
E-Mail: kelly.johnson@enron.com


FYI.  This is the presentation that the Brattle Group---a consulting group
that Edison has long used on gas issues in California---gave last week to the
legislative committee investigating wholesale gas prices at the California
Border.  The day following this presentation (which was followed by a
presentation by the California PUC's FERC lawyer), the committee called El
Paso and Dynegy to respond to Brattle's and the CPUC FERC lawyer's
presentations.  Also attached is the best synopsis of the hearing that I've
seen in the press.

Best,
Jeff
******************************************************************************
****************************************************
Competing evidence clouds Calif. investigation

Prompted in part by the California Public Utilities Commission, the
California Assembly
has been scrutinizing the role that interstate pipelines have played in the
state,s current
energy crisis. In the efforts to find a smoking gun, legislators have leaned
heavily on a
report prepared by The Brattle Group, a consultancy commissioned by utility
Southern California
Edison to dig up evidence of market power abuse.

But the state,s biggest transporter of gas to California -- El Paso Natural
Gas -- is not
ready to take the rap. The pipeline has commissioned its own study, which it
recently presented
as evidence that it has not circumvented any laws or regulation.

As reported in both the trade press and national media, SoCal Ed and the CPUC
are pointing
the finger of blame at El Paso for alleged manipulation of California border
prices through
affiliate deals and capacity hoarding. And exhibit A in their case against El
Paso is The Brattle
Group,s study of the California market.

Richard Zeiger, a spokesman for Assembly Member Darrell Steinberg, chairman
of the
California Assembly Judiciary Committee, told Gas Daily that The Brattle
Group,s market
study proved that the surge in gas prices at the California border was not
caused by normal
market forces (GD 4/20). His remarks followed an oversight hearing during
which Assembly
members questioned Dynegy and El Paso officials about their involvement in
the California
market.

El Paso presented a different version of events to the Assembly. In a report
presented to
legislators, a research group hired by El Paso concluded that a convergence
of factors, not a
conspiracy, caused the price run-up.

Lukens Consulting Group, a Houston-based consultancy, was retained by El Paso
to conduct
work on several fronts. In its study of the California market, Lukens
concluded that the
increasing convergence of the gas and electricity businesses was one of the
main culprits in the
California gas price imbroglio.

Assemblyman John Campbell, a Republican member of the oversight committee,
said he
"didn,t see any smoking gun" in either report.

"We had our committee hearing, and we certainly had a lot on the Brattle
Study and a little
on the Lukens study. To some degree, I,m not sure that the California
legislature is the best
place to adjudicate the differences between these two studies," Campbell
said. "I believe FERC
is looking at this situation " and it would seem to me that that,s the
appropriate place."

Campbell said that the CPUC had been prodding the California legislature to
give support
to its claims of market power abuse by pipelines. "It,s being pushed
basically by the Public
Utilities Commission here, which believes that there was collusion" by
pipeline companies to
push up gas prices in California, he said.

The CPUC, Campbell suggested, sought satisfaction before the California
assembly when
it had failed on the federal level: "There,s a concerted effort, not just on
natural gas but on other
things here in California, for entities and organizations here to point the
finger elsewhere for
the problems that we,re having in this state and I think you,re seeing some
of that with the
public utilities commission."

Whether either report wins over the public incensed by high natural gas
prices is a different
matter entirely. In the meanwhile, the dueling California market studies seem
to have taken
on a life of their own.

The Brattle Group Study, for instance, has become the center of a heavily
litigated effort to
force FERC to compel the release of market data by California market
participants. Following
on a request by SoCal Ed, which said it needed additional data to round out
The Brattle Group
report, FERC Chief ALJ Curtis Wagner issued subpoenas to the other three
major pipelines that
serve the state as well as to Sempra Energy Trading.

Several parties resisted FERC,s call for market information, saying the
requested data
contained commercially sensitive information. FERC allowed the discovery
process to move
forward but only after attaching strict data protection rules restricting
access to evidence
(GD 4/23).

Critics of the pipeline industry have already suffered one setback in their
case. The commission
recently dismissed the CPUC,s claim that El Paso rigged the auction of a
large block of
pipeline capacity in favor of affiliate El Paso Merchant Energy. In
addressing the California
Assembly, representatives of Dynegy said that FERC,s recent ruling on the
California border
controversy obviated the need for more investigation.

The controversy, however, is far from over. FERC last month also ordered a
hearing into
whether El Paso Natural Gas and its affiliates manipulated capacity to drive
up the price of gas
delivered into California (GD 3/29). That hearing is likely to take place
this summer. (RP00-
241, et al.) NH

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001 05:23 PM -----

	Douglas.Porter@sce.com
	04/19/2001 11:36 AM

		 To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt

Per your request, attached are the presentation slides from yesterday.

Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison Company
(626)302-3964
(626)302-3990(fax)
douglas.porter@sce.com(See attached file: DRT2486.PPT)
 - DRT2486.PPT


The list below that Cyndie prepared contains approximately 300 contracts that
have not been assigned. Can we verify that these are all contracts that are
active?  Also, who in our organization is continuing to pursue these
assignments?  Columbia would like to reduce the guaranty (I have agreed to a
reduction due to Risk's analysis that no MTM exposure exists, only delivery
which I have asked Bryce Baxter to quantify); however, further reductions are
dependent on Bryce being able to determine the receivable risk assosciated
with the unassigned, active contracts.

Thanks for your help,
Tanya
---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 11:50
AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
12/05/2000 06:32 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES

The deals that we have in our system are not inclusive of gas daily daily
deals or deals at index.  These deals are all in our physical sytems but are
not at a fixed price,  therefore have no forward mark to market value.  These
are the deals that are not evergreen deals.

From:  Tanya Rohauer
   12/05/2000 06:23 PM

To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES

I am somewhat unclear as to how we got from the 300 or so contracts that have
not been assigned per Cyndie's list below to 3?  Does that mean all the other
contracts have rolled off? Guadalupe Power Partners LP looks like one that
has not rolled off that was a huge term sale with considerable delivery
risk.  Are all of the deals on Cyndie's list index deals? Let's chat tomorrow.

Thanks,
Tanya

Jeffrey C Gossett
12/05/2000 05:49 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CES

Let me know what else I can do.

Thanks,

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000
05:48 PM ---------------------------

Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
12/04/2000 09:56 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES

Attached is a spreadsheet which tracks the CES non-assigned contracts. This
spreadsheet is current as of 12/04/00. I have also attached a 10/01/00 deal
extract showing all deals in Sitara that still carried the CES prefix (which
is used to denote non-assigned deals), this report was originally pulled from
Sitara for Tanya Rohauer. Please call me at 713.853.1443 if I can be of any
further assistance.

Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan
ENA - Global Contracts

CES Transactions (Deal Extract) 10/1/00 - forward
(Please note, there are several transactions for which consent has not been
received that are flagged as evergreen in Sitara and as such represent a
"rolling" CES transaction and as such exposure until consent for assignment
is received or until the transaction/contract is terminated. I have
highlighted these transaction in green.)


It is already time to begin preparation for another regular Board meeting on Tuesday, Feb. 12 with Committee meetings on the afternoon of Monday, Feb. 11.  We need to set the schedule this week in order for the members of the Board to get nonrefundable airfares.  By Thursday, please advise me of how much time you will need for the Committee meetings (or for your portion) on Feb. 11:

Audit			Andrew
Compensation		Mary
Finance			Rick
			Ray

Thanks.  Paula


P. V. Krishnarao
1914 Crisfield Drive
Sugar Land, TX77479
Home: 281-240-5705
Cell:	713-303-2754
Email: anukrishna@aol.com

The file below has the same information if you want to save it somewhere.
Krishna.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	John Buchanan - Oncall

Date:		5/12/2001
Time:		7:00 AM - 7:55 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Judy, my apologies for the delay in responding to your request.  The meeting
is scheduled to take place at Enron Broadband Services facility located at
727 N. Shepherd Drive.  I have attached a map for your file.  There are no
hotels in that area, but hotels located downtown are approximately 15 minutes
away by taxi or car.  I would suggest the DoubleTree Allen Center
(713.759.0202), the Downtown Hyatt Regency (713.654.1234), or the Four
Seasons Hotel (713.650.1300).  Should you have any problems securing a room,
please let me know.  I'll be contacting you and the other speakers within the
next week to arrange a conference call.  In the meantime, please let me know
if you have any other questions.  Regards, Sherri

Judy Ward <JWard@kpcb.com> on 03/23/2001 04:24:03 PM
To: "'jeff.skilling@enron.com'" <jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: YPO Panel on 4.24

Jeff,

I am planning Kevin Compton,s travel to Houston for the YPO panel.
Please send me the name and address of the building where this will take
place.  Also, since he will be coming in the night before, which hotels
would you recommend?

Thank you.

Judy Ward

Judy Ward
Assistant to Kevin Compton
650 233-3459
jward@kpcb.com


Sara,

Further to my previous e-mail, I would be grateful if you would let me
have your comments on the revised draft ISDA and Credit Support
documentation between Morgan Stanley and Enron North America.

My colleagues here are very keen to finalise the documentation as soon
as possible this week.  Please let me know if you have any queries or
would like to discuss any points further.

I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible.
Many thanks
Regards
Megan Duffill
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter

 - Megan.Duffill.vcf


Kind of makes you wonder!

-----Original Message-----
From: Suzanne.M.Bennett@dynegy.com [mailto:Suzanne.M.Bennett@dynegy.com]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 10:15 AM
To: bswaldrop@aol.com; melissa@thesligroup.com
Subject: Fortune cookie

considering our conversation last night about China, I thought you'd
appreciate..........ha ha ha! just don't ask about what you are eating!

---------------------- Forwarded by Suzanne M Bennett/HOU/Dynegy on
04/20/2001 10:13 AM ---------------------------
(See attached file: fortune.jpg)

?
 - fortune.jpg


Nothing with or pertaining to  CGI Information Systems & Management
Consultants, Inc to the best of my knowledge.

Kay

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com

	Mark Greenberg@ENRON
	03/21/2001 01:03 PM

		 To: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: CGI Information Systems & Management Consultants, Inc

Kay -

Do we have a confidentiality agreement with the subject company?

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


I'll send the Outside Services portion separately.  Thanks!


Cara,

I called you on Wednesday, 01/25/01, the same day you left me a message.  It
was 5:50PM(CST) and the assistant said you were already gone home for the
day.  I was out of the office yesterday and I left all of the information
with my manager (Theresa Allen) who would have been happy to explain the
report to you.  Please give myself or Theresa Allen a call today and we will
any questions that you may have.  Thanks!!

Cara Semperger
01/25/2001 03:33 PM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron, Kelley
Huntley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Valarie Sabo/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: FERC and DOE 4th Quarter Reports

I have gotten these documents from Tim, Val, and now you.  I have tried to
get in touch with Linda Lawrence and Kelly Hutley, no answer from either of
them.  I don't understand what I am looking at, and am not even really sure
what I am supposed to do with it, aside from giving it my blessing.

Until I get a response, I can't give my 'blessing'

C

Mary Hain
01/25/2001 01:08 PM
To: Cara Semperger
cc:
Subject: FERC and DOE 4th Quarter Reports

Did Tim already send you these documents for your review?  If he did, have
you been working with the Houston group on them or do you want to tell me
about any problems?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001 01:17 PM
---------------------------

Linda L Lawrence@ENRON
01/23/2001 03:17 PM
Sent by: Linda L Lawrence@ENRON
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FERC and DOE 4th Quarter Reports

For your review  are EPMI's fourth quarter reports for Canada and Mexico.

----- Forwarded by Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron on 01/23/2001 05:14 PM -----

	Joy Werner
	01/23/2001 03:43 PM

		 To: Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelley
Huntley/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: FERC and DOE 4th Quarter Reports

There was no Mexico activity for the Fourth Quarter of 2000.
Please let me know if you all have any questions or comments regarding any of
the reports.
Thank you
Joy


FYI

"Seabron Adamson" <seabron.adamson@frontiereconomics.com> on 05/21/2001
09:19:19 AM
Please respond to <seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com>
To: <Richard.Shapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Memo on policy paper conclusions and staff call

Rick:

Please find attached a short memo regarding last week's call with Jim and
the Enron RTO team. It also has some thoughts on what we might cover with
Steve K. at 2:00 p.m. CDT today.

Some other time I would like to have a quick chat about how we move to the
next step with the RTOs. It strikes me that there has been a real absence of
cleare-headed thinking in the stakeholder chin-wagging sessions. If FERC
will not impose a single design - on an abbreviated timeframe - is there
another way to add some economic logic into the equation?

Speak to you later...

Seabron

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

 - 01-05-21 SA Memo to Rick Shapiro on RTO conference call.doc


Martin:

I am told by my assistant (Jan Dobernecker) that the Human Resources
Department here has people who will assist you on the practicalities.  Jan
has asked them to get in touch with you directly.  If you have not heard from
someone by the middle of next week, please let me or Jan know so we can
either prod them into action or get you a contact name and number to call.

We are all very much looking forward to your arrival and I'd be happy to
discuss any questions (and I'm sure there must be several) that come to mind
- just give me a call.

Mark

Martin Rosell
12/03/98 02:49 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Absence

Mark,

Following the message below, please be informed that I plan to come over to
Houston 15 January next year and stay for 6-7 weeks (at Murphy's Montecito
apartments).  Maybe we could change a few words on this before Christmas.
Also, do you know to whom I may turn in order to settle the practicalities
(invitation letter to show immigration authorities, insurance, car, etc.)?!

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 03/12/98 08:38
---------------------------

Scott Sefton
27/11/98 17:41
To: Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Absence

We ought to investigate the possibility of having a Wikborg lawyer over every
afternoon, with the understanding that the Wikborg lawyer would also be
available to work on our stuff in the morning. This is our chance to develop
a relationship with a new Wikborg lawyer who could replace Jarle Erik. Please
confirm the dates that you will be gone. I assume that you will be back in
Oslo by March 1. Please co-ordinate your Houston visit with Mark Taylor.
Thanks!


Meeting with Bill Bradford, David Ports, Elizabeth Sager, Tracy Ngo & Ed Facks


Have you liquidated the NG PR Crude roll? I am pulling $915,600 income, from TAGG. The DPR shows zero value.

Shannon McPearson
Enron North America
713-853-5944
Shannon.McPearson@enron.com


I promise to be a perfect gentleman (or as perfect as an Aggie can be).

Clayton Vernon@ENRON
02/17/2000 11:23 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Natasha-

now, now, now-

you're a 38 year-old man, and you're talking about serious issues- marriage
and a family. hey, i'm the biggest kid you'll ever meet, but we're talking
about my wife's best friend here, so pretend like she's my sister or
something.

claybus


Hi there,

I've made some suggested changes on the CO you sent.  In the interest of time
I'm sending this to David Marshall, since this largely deals with ROL and
insurance, and I couldn't tell if he has read this previously.

Thanks,

Kay


Jeff,

What do you think of this Edmund Lewandowski mural painting , 1942, 103" x
67". Incredible!

See you this weekend.

-Michael

 - Industry.jpg


Miguel,

EGEP extends our best wishes to you on pursuing your new assignment and
expresses sincere appreciation for all of your assistance with our DealBench
projects.

You probably follow the DealBench activity but if you haven't watched
specific details, we have observed the following activity level to date:
 India Deal Rooms A-G  9573 Deal and Document hits (since 27 Dec when stats
became available)
 India Deal Room  H    417 Deal and Document hits (since opening 1 Feb)
 China Deal Rooms A-B    500 Deal and Document hits (since opening 23 Feb)

We consider the DealBench datarooms a great success.  We appreciate the
insights you shared with us when we were first designing the rooms, as well
as, the support  you provided with regard to our questions and problems
thereafter.  You were always knowledgeable, resourceful, responsive and
courteous in all of our dealings.

Thanks again, Miguel.  We will miss you in the DealBench project group but
will look forward to hearing about your new assignment.

Sincerely,
Paula