Women in the league?  Are you *%#$%$@&& mad??????

Grant Johnson

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Anthony Servello [mailto:Ty.Servello@cs.oag.state.tx.us]
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:21 PM
To:	Jeff_Smith@AFCC.com; Chris.Kiske@arbitron.com; ckiske@austin.rr.com;
johnsogc@bp.com; Jerry.Spottswood@COMPAQ.com; jeffu192@cs.com;
DG_SKI@email.msn.com; Dutch.Quigley@enron.com; b_sting91@excite.com;
Andy_Reynolds@panda-law.com; klyn@pdq.net; mcurrie@tcta.org;
michael.deluke@us.pwcglobal.com
Subject:	RE: Franchise Players and the Draft

i got a call from jody's alleged partner last night...he's out and feels
guilty so since he is a manager at sherlock's....free 1st round when we
decide to visit....cheap bastard!

so am i jody's partner and do we have a 14th team????

i'm not sure who's more pathetic....me giving up a hawaiian vacation
2 years ago so i could partake....or grant taking time from work and
flying in from alaska to be part of the houston ffl?

gamblers rule!  now if we could only entice jody to bring aboard his
wife....all would be right.

ty.servello@cs.oag.state.tx.us

>>> "Smith, Jeff" <Jeff_Smith@AFCC.com> 09/06/01 10:44AM >>>
That idea is the best I've heard so far.  And this thing about not voting
this year is crap because if enough people have issues about something it
should be voted on for this year.  It's not like it would be a major problem
to implement such a system for this year as you've already said we'll come
with two systems on Saturday.  This is what email is for - why can't we have
a vote on email between today and tomorrow and have a decision before
Saturday.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Dutch.Quigley@enron.com [SMTP:Dutch.Quigley@enron.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:33 AM
> To:	Smith, Jeff; Chris.Kiske@arbitron.com; klyn@pdq.net;
> Ty.Servello@OAG.STATE.TX.US; michael.deluke@us.pwcglobal.com;
> mcurrie@tcta.org; Jerry.Spottswood@COMPAQ.com; jeffu192@cs.com;
> johnsogc@bp.com; DG_SKI@email.msn.com; ckiske@austin.rr.com;
> b_sting91@excite.com; Andy_Reynolds@panda-law.com
> Subject:	RE: Franchise Players and the Draft
>
> suggested draft order:
>
> scenario
> 5 franchise teams and 7 non-franchise
> franchise teams ranked 1 - 5 based on total points of franchise player
> from
> previous year
>
> First the supplemental draft
>
> Round one
> # 5 franchise team, # 7 supplemental , # 4 franchise , # 6 supplemental
> and
> so forth and so on
>
> with a non snake system going from there
>
> ok everyone chew on that and spit back
>
> Dutch
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Smith, Jeff" <Jeff_Smith@AFCC.com>@ENRON
>
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Smith+2C+20Jeff+22+20+3CJeff+5FSmith+40AFCC+2Ecom+3E
> +40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:44 AM
>    To:     'Kiske, Chris'; 'Kevin'; Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael
>              Currie; Jody Spottswood; Jeff Ullrich; Grant Johnson;
> Quigley,
>              Dutch; Dan Wienserski; Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy
>              Reynolds
>    Subject:  RE: Franchise Players and the Draft
>
>    The snake thing is good and bad.   But I think the first round should
> be
>    randomly selected for ALL teams because the current way gives those not
>    keeping a franchise player a double benefit by picking in the
>    supplemental
>    and then also at the top of the first round.   Theoretically the non
>    keeper
>    teams are getting the 8-14 best players who are arguably also franchise
>    players.  In effect by not keeping a player you are randomly selecting
> a
>    lower level franchise player.  So they shouldn't get the an automatic
>    shot
>    at 15-22 or whatever it might be as well.  So snake or no snake all of
>    round
>    one should be random order.
>
>    > -----Original Message-----
>    > From:      Kiske, Chris [SMTP:Chris.Kiske@arbitron.com]
>    > Sent:      Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:59 PM
>    > To:   'Kevin'; Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael Currie; Jody
>    Spottswood;
>    > Jeff Ullrich; Smith, Jeff; Grant Johnson; Dutch Quigley; Dan
>    Wienserski;
>    > Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy Reynolds; Kiske, Chris
>    > Subject:   RE: Franchise Players and the Draft
>    >
>    > As the creator of the algebraic mean sequenced draft order that was
>    built
>    > to eliminate the inherent advantage that the #1 & #14 teams had by
>    getting
>    > back to back picks every other round, I think the time for
>    mathematical
>    > preciseness has passed.  I'm all for going to a simplified
> traditional
>    > snake system.  Frankly, at this point I think there are as many
>    > disadvantages to being 1 or 14 (or 2 - 13) as advantages that it all
>    works
>    > itself out.  Hell, if it makes preparing for the draft any easier (or
>    > administering the league), I'm for it!
>    >
>    > PS - I'm for keeping TE's too!
>    >
>    > (Somewhere, Rick is rolling over in his grave)
>    >
>    >
>    >       -----Original Message-----
>    >       From: Kevin [mailto:klyn@pdq.net]
>    >       Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:53 PM
>    >       To: Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael Currie; Jody Spottswood;
>    Jeff
>    > Ullrich; Jeff Smith (E-mail); Grant Johnson; Dutch Quigley; Dan
>    > Wienserski; Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy Reynolds; Chris Kiske
>    > (Work)
>    >       Subject: Franchise Players and the Draft
>    >
>    >
>    >       The following is the list of franchise players that have been
>    kept:
>    >
>    >       Grant Johnson - Eddie George
>    >       Jeff Smith - Peyton Manning
>    >       Michael Deluke - Marshall Faulk
>    >       Michael Currie - Edgerrian James
>    >       Jeff Ullrich - Kurt Warner
>    >
>    >       I know this was brought up last year and we kind of decided
> much
>    of
>    > nothing...but does anyone object to going to a snake system for the
>    draft.
>    > 1-14, 14-1 for the whole draft?  We will still have a supplemental
>    round
>    > for those that do not keep franchise players.  Then the non-franchise
>    > teams will pick in opposite order of the supplemental round for round
>    > one...thus if you pick first in the supplemental round, you will pick
>    last
>    > (for those that did not keep franchise players) in the first round.
>    Then,
>    > the teams that kept franchise players will be randomly selected to
>    pick at
>    > the end of the first round.  After the first round, the draft will
>    snake
>    > back the other way with the last pick in the first round getting the
>    first
>    > pick in the second round and the draft will continue in this snake
>    order
>    > until the end of the draft.  Let me know what you think or if you are
>    > confused.
>    >
>    >       See everyone at the draft!!!
>    >
>    >       Kevin
>    >
>    >h>    and then also at the top of th
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
> are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
> its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


<meta name="description" content="The Computer Products Superstore. Supplying the world since 1984 with guaranteed lowest prices, huge inventory, easy ordering, and super fast service.">
<title>PROVANTAGE.COM : The Original Advantage</title>

<map name="FPMap0">
      <area href="http://www.provantage.com" shape="rect" coords="437, 3, 589, 43"></map>

          October 16, 2001

Can't
            read this email? Click
            here

          Issue#:
            e11210

To
            unsubscribe from the

            Original Advantage Click
      here

            (Do Not Reply to this email)

          PROVANTAGE
            Customer: jeff_dasovich@enron.com

<!VR>
<!EVR>

What's New at PROVANTAGE?
The
latest additions
to our product line along with money-saving
Rebates!

NEW
PRODUCTS!

New!

MSDN Operating Systems 7.0 Subscription
By Microsoft

MSDN Operating Systems contains the same content as the prior MSDN Professional level.

Provides priority access to essential resources for <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $629.70

New!

SX630 8-Bay Mini-Tower w/300W ATX
By Antec

Performance Series cases come full of features that anyone who puts a system together can appreciate. Tired of the old inverted U-covered cases? Performance <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $82.65

New!

Windows XP Home Edition
By Microsoft

Designed exclusively for home computing - puts the exciting experiences of the digital age at your fingertips. Digital photos, music, video, home <nobr>...More</nobr>

Version Upgrade  $100.00

New!

PenCam VR (Voice Recorder) 5-In-1 Camera USB
By Aiptek

For USB & Windows 2000, 98, Me & XP. Built in 8MB of SDRAM

Voice Recorder Audio record function makes PenCam ideal for dictation <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $81.28

New!

Z340 3pc 33W Speaker System
By Logitech

The Logitech Z340 produces clear highs and distortion-free lows through a revolutionary subwoofer design delivering twice the bass energy of similar systems. <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $36.47

New!

SmartPad2 for Windows
By Seiko Instruments

Imagine writing anything. In any language. Drawing whatever you like. Writing with ink on paper. And capturing everything on your handheld organizer (for <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $175.74

REBATES!

WordPerfect Office 2002 Professional
By Corel

$30 Rebate through 12/31/01

Receive $30 cash back when you buy WordPerfect Office 2002 Professional Edition (upgrade or full product) between September 1, 2001 and December 31, <nobr>...More</nobr>

Version Upgrade  $208.46

LP340B DLP Projector 1300 Lumens SVGA 800x600
By InFocus Projectors

$30 Rebate through 12/31/01

The new InFocus LP340 heralds the next generation of portable digital projectors. Its bright 1300 lumens and advanced video capabilities make for years <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $2499.00

Pocket PC Camera for USB
By Intel

$30 Rebate through 12/31/01

Get a $30 rebate direct from Intel when you purchase the Pocket PC Camera between June 1, 2001 and May 31, 2002. <nobr>
...More</nobr>

  $114.40

MiniView USB 2-Port KVM Switch Kit w/Cable
By IOGEAR

$20 Rebate through 12/31/01

Buy a MiniView USB 2-Port KVM Switch between June 15, 2001 and December 31, 2001 and receive $20 cash back! To receive your rebate coupon click <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $99.49

New Version!

Norton SystemWorks 2002 v5.0 PRO for Windows 2000/
By Symantec

$30 Rebate through 12/31/01

$30 mfg mail-in rebate for owners of ANY Norton or Symantec software product, or owners of any retail (boxed or downloaded) software products <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $92.19

CD-RW Drive 8x/4x/24x FireWire Slimline Ext i.Link
By Sony

$30 Rebate through 12/31/01

Take CD recording on the road with the Sony Ultra Slim Portable CD-RW drive! Native i.LINK interface (IEEE1394 and FireWire compatible) capable of sustaining <nobr>...More</nobr>

  $268.21

Web
      Address: www.PROVANTAGE.com

       Toll Free: 800-336-1166     Fax:
330-494-5260     email: sales@provantage.com

        Privacy
        Policy | Terms &
        Conditions | FREE
        Catalog

©2001
        PROVANTAGE Corporation, 7249 Whipple Ave. NW, North Canton, OH 44720

    Products,
        prices, terms, conditions, or offers may change at any time. Company
        and/or product names are generally trademarks, or registered trademarks
        of their respective companies. Some promotional text may be copyrighted
        by the product's manufacturer.

        The
        Original Advantage promotional email is delivered only to customers of
        PROVANTAGE Corporation. PROVANTAGE customers have purchased products in
        the past and submitted their email address as part of the checkout
        process. Or, customers have entered their name in the "Add to Email
        List" box on the PROVANTAGE.com home page. Any customer may unsubscribe from the list at any time by going
        to http://www.provantage.com/unsubscribe.htm.
        The email address is permanently removed from additional promotional
        electronic mailings, and will not be reactivated unless requested by the
        customer.


To:	     Management Committee Members
From:  Cindy Olson, Beth Tilney and Mark Palmer
The attached is the results of the Focus Groups that we conducted per our action plan from the "Lay it on the Line Survey".  Frank Luntz will be at the Management Committee meeting today to discuss this information.


Here are revised draft transaction agreements for September and October.  I
believe
that we have revised all the small volume changes that are indicated on the
schedule
that I just sent out.

Also, attached is a revised set of GSA procedures that incorporate Marty's
quick comments
on Bullet Point #5 under the GSA Daily Nomination section.

Ruth

---------------------- Forwarded by Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
11:40 AM ---------------------------

Dan J Hyvl
09/26/2000 11:27 AM
To: Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Sithe Independence -- Sept and Oct transaction agreements
attached.


he is out until thursday due to death in the family. if urgent, let me know and I will reassign

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Johnson, Rudwell
Cc:	Rohauer, Tanya
Subject:	FW: Orlando Utilities Commission

Hi, Rudwell.  Can you  please resond to me email.  Thanks.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Johnson, Rudwell
Cc:	Friedman, Richard
Subject:	Orlando Utilities Commission

Rudwell:

You are handling this counterparty from a credit perspective.  Rich Friedman from Global Markets has called to inquire about the status of this ISDA request.  Please refer to Lotus Notes to review the last action taken by Russell in February, 2001.  Please determine whether we can eliminate the Credit Support Annex from this agreement before we send another version.  You will note that this counterparty wants to rely entirely on the form used by Aron.  Russell has a copy of this agreement.

Do you want to put this on the legal credit list for follow up?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Dan Douglass summarized this.  This really puts CA and the ISO on notice that
they cannot confiscate the power as they seem ready to do -- FERC reiterates
that the generators can sell power wherever they want because the cap is a
cap on ISO purchases.  ANd if the ISO want to set a sale price cap it has to
file with FERC, wait 60 days and amend its contract
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 08/01/2000 01:01
AM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 07/31/2000 07:27:24 PM
To: <peter.bray@att.net>, <JBarthrop@electric.com>, <mnelson@electric.com>,
<rschlanert@electric.com>, <Bruno_Gaillard@enron.com>, <kmagrude@enron.com>,
<mpetroch@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <athomas@newenergy.com>,
<bchen@newenergy.com>, <Jeff.Hanson@phaser.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>,
<andrew.madden@utility.com>, <ben.reyes@utility.com>,
<chris.king@utility.com>, <david.bayless@utility.com>
cc:
Subject: FERC Order on Morgan Stanley Complaint Against ISO

We have good news on the ISO price caps front.  The FERC has made it
clear that ISO does not have the ability to mandate that generators sell to
ISO at its price caps and that the proper response to inadequate supply is to
lift the price caps.

On Friday, the FERC issued its Order on Complaint in connection with the July
10 complaint filed by Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. ("MS").  As you may
recall, MS requested FERC to issue a stay of the ISO's maximum purchase price
authority and to direct the ISO to reverse any price cap reductions.  MS
sought Fast Track processing pursuant to Rule 206(h), which was granted by
FERC on the grounds that the complaint "warrants expeditious action."

As a quick background summary for you, last November, FERC issued an order
approving Tariff Amendment 21 which extended ISO's price cap authority
through 11/15/00.  That order stated that the ISO "maximum purchase price was
not a cap on what the seller may charge the ISO, but a cap on what the ISO
was willing to pay."  The Commission said that sellers dissatisfied with the
price cap could "choose to sell those services into the California Power
Exchange or bilateral markets."

FERC notes in Friday's Order that the 6/28 the ISO's Board resolution lowered
the caps to $500 and ISO further directed that, "To the extent permitted by
law, regulation and pre-existing contract, Management shall direct generators
to bid in all their capacity when system load exceeds 38,000 MW."

The MS complaint alleged that the cap reduction was unlawful and would,
"threaten the stability and integroty of the marketplace."  MS also requested
an emergency technical conference to examine ISO's justification for the
price cap reduction.

FERC denied the MS stay request, as well as its request that the $750 maximum
purchase price be reinstated.  The Commission reiterates that it is not
approving a cap on sellers' prices, because they can sell at whatever price
they want.  Rather ISO has simply stated the maximum price it is willing to
pay.  "Because sellers are not required to sell to the ISO, the ISO cannot
dictate their price."

Importantly, however, FERC also states that, "ISO has no more or less ability
to procure capacity and energy than any other buyer of these services....if
the ISO is unable to elicit sufficient supplies at or below its announced
purchase price ceiling (because generators are free to sell elsewhere if they
choose), it will have to raise its purchase price to the level necessary to
meet its needs."  [Emphasis added]  FERC then notes that this may lead to an
increase in Out of Market ("OOM") calls and that OOM calls are not subject to
a maximum purchase price.

Also, with regard to the ISO's resolution stating that generators must bid
their capacity into the ISO markets when system load exceeds 38,000 MW, FERC
states clearly that, "such a requirement is not permitted by our November  12
Order and the ISO tariff."  [Emphasis added]

FERC goes on to say that any requirement to sell to ISO in conjunction with a
maximum purchase price would require significant revisions to ISO's market
rules, which could not be made effective without a corresponding amendment to
ISO's tariff.  This would require 60 days' advance notice, "and could not be
implemented prior to Commission approval.  As stated above, our November 12
Order was clearly based on the premise that the proper response to inadequate
supply (due to a low maximum purchase price) is to raise the maximum purchase
price."

ISO is then "put on notice that any amendment to mandate sales must be
accompanied by a demonstration that this extreme measure is the proper
response to low supplies in the ISO markets."

Concurrences were filed by Commissioners Massey and Hebert.  Massey suggests
that the state has to facilitate solutions to market issues, such as risk
management tools, removing constraints on hedging opportunities, introducing
real time pricing through real time metering and expediting approval of new
generation and transmission projects in California.  Hebert says that the
previous November Order tried to "straddle the fence" and that, "Today, the
Commission at least starts to lean slightly in the right direction of
recognizing that we have a role."  He then reiterates his preference for
removing all price caps.  He also suggests that, "Getting to the bottom of
the problem, in my view, requires us to begin a proceeding to rescind our
approval of the ISO as operator of the California grid.  The record supports
such a move."  He refers approvingly to the Collins resignation letter,
stating that it, "thoughtfully outlines consequences to the market of a
return to 'command and control.' "  Hebert states that, "The independence of
the ISO's governing structure stands threatened.  We should 'stand up,' to
quote the resignation letter."  Hebert advocates opening a section 206
proceeding now, as part of the recently announced inquiry into bulk power
markets, "including the California markets."

This decision makes it clear that ISO cannot lower the caps at tomorrow's
meeting and expect that sellers will be required to sell to it at that
price.  This is an important development and very good news in our ongoing
efforts to seek economic sanity at the ISO.

Please call if you have any questions.

Dan


Thanks - hope to see you soon


Okay gang, it's time to rally the troops.  Evidently last week wasn't good
for any of us to get together at our local watering hole (a.k.a Little
Woodrow's)...but, I'm hoping the story is a little different this week.  Our
own Nick Stephan is back in H-town for the week and has made a special
request for a full-fledged "Steak Night" (that means good attendance).  Not
that I ever need an excuse to enjoy good company, steak, beer, etc. at LW's,
but if I did I could think of few better reasons than a visiting ex-pat.
Besides, given the absolutely beautiful weather we are currently enjoying,
the picnic tables and deck are beckoning.  I'm going to set a tentative
meeting time of 7:30 p.m. this Wednesday...get back to me at your convenience
and let me know if we should stick with that time or not.  Hope everyone had
a relaxing weekend and is having a good Monday (isn't that an oxymoron?).

Susan

"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading."

                            - Henny Youngman


Start Date: 10/23/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102304.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Dear Legal Folks:

Westlaw is offering the Law of the United Kingdom, its new area of coverage
free for the month of April.   Use your personal ID/PW to log on.   You may
call Westlaw Reference Attorneys - 1-800-733-2889 for research assistance or
Training Staff - 1-800-757-9378 ext. 69065 for FREE telephone training.

Please read the message from Michael Springer- Westlaw attorney,new rep for
our account:

Attached is a list of our new UK materials.  All of the databases on the
> list will be free for the month of April, however printing will NOT be
> included.  That means that printing will cost $5.00 per document or $0.02
> per line, whichever you are set for.

For Houston Folks:

You are invited to a Westlaw Luncheon at EB47C2, Friday, 4/14 from 11:30 AM
to 1:00 PM.  Michael Springer - Westlaw attorney is going to give a
presentation on UK and other international legal, news, business materials on
Westlaw. Lunch will be provided by Westlaw.  Please R.S.V.P.to Sylvia Hu (
email or call x 36775) by Thursday,4/13 before noon.

Thanks,

Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775
sylvia.hu@enron.com


Being that our commish is off in Vegas gambling off our league fees and I do not know whether he is going to view any transaction requests this weekend, I am letting you guys (and gal) know that I have put in a request to pick up Olandis Gary and Drop Tony Richardson from my lineup.  If the transaction goes through, I wish to start Gary and Hambrick and RB this week.  If the transaction does not go through, then my lineup remains as posted on the league website (Hambrick and James Stewart).  I'm hurting at RB this week.  Anyone interested in a trade (I need a RB)?
the DOG


Sara asked me to send you the attached.

Kaye


i agree lets go, what store sells toothpaste?

-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:40 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:

why?  what happened?  i am feeling sick.  i honestly cannot hear this Enron crap all day long!

-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:39 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:

the crown plaza next door

-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:

where did you stay?

-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:37 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:

only for the night

-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:37 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:

please tell me that you did not move out.  and why didn't you buy some this morning?

-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:35 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:

i forgot to pack my toothpaste, long story

-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:34 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:

what?  no.  are you being serious.  you can get some in the store in the other building.  did you forget to brush your teeth this morning?

-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:33 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:

no i havent heard anything, do you have any toothpaste

-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:31 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:

it was good. i guess.  i didn't want to come back.  and what am i late for?  it's not like i have a whole lot to do.  have you heard anything about today or tomorrow?  i love coming to work.....more and more rumors to greet you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:30 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:

dont hush me, how was youre trip back

-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:29 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:

Hush
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


David:

In the midst of leaving my voice mail, I think I realized my error.
I believe that a guarantor can be a "corporation,....entity" having total
asssts exceeding $10million.  However, that subpart (I) guarantor cannot be
one that falls into the subpart (III) category (which is different from the
prior law).

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Hey Paul, how is it going??  Attached you'll  find some of the pics from the halloween party.  I hope you like  them.  I'm going to Brasil today!!!  Just for 4 days, I guess  it's better than nothing.  Let's do something when I get back.  Our  weekends have been pretty laid back lately.

We miss you guys!!!

Um grande abraco,
Eduardo
 - Pict0010.JPG
 - Pict0014.JPG
 - Pict0024.JPG
 - Pict0025.JPG


[IMAGE]
 Save 10% Speak No Evil, Hear No Evil Monkey Bikes...  One of the Hottest Gifts for Holiday 2001... Just enter the coupon code MQJ36GX6 in the checkout process to receive your discount.  Offer expires November 16, 2001.  Want to win your Fantasy League?  Our Fantasy Football Guides are the SOURCE for strategy, player ratings, scouting reports, team reports, projections and more!  A must have for beginners and Fantasy veterans alike.  Special in season price $9.99. Going Fast - Click Here!   Save $.05 a gallon on the gas that keeps your car's engine clean. Click here  to apply online.   Brought to you by   Sponsorship Bar You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these reports please  click here    Scouting Reports, Player Updates  [IMAGE]Latest NFL Player News  James Stewart , RB DET  Updated 11/18/01 Stewart (ankle) is out for Sunday's game against Arizona. However, coach Marty Mornhinweg stated that Stewart is making progress, and is getting closer to returning to action.   Marco Battaglia , TE CIN  Updated 11/18/01 Battaglia (appendectomy) is out at least a month, and may miss the rest of the season. The big tight end has no real value as a Fantasy player.   Mark Brunell , QB JAC  Updated 11/18/01 Brunell (quadriceps) will start on Sunday against Pittsburgh. He'll be facing a tough Steelers' secondary at less than 100 percent, however, so Fantasy owners may want to consider benching him in Week 10.   Fred Taylor , RB JAC  Updated 11/18/01 Taylor (groin) practiced without incident on Friday, but he still needs medical clearance before he can play in Sunday's game against Pittsburgh. Even is he is able to play, however, he'd only be used on a limited basis. Stacey Mack will get the start in any event, so playing Taylor on your Fantasy team is not a wise move. !   Jerome Pathon , WR IND  Updated 11/18/01 Pathon (foot) is out for Sunday's game against New Orleans, according to the Indianapolis Star. Reggie Wayne will start in Pathon's place once again.   James Jackson , RB CLE  Updated 11/18/01 Jackson (ankle) will likely be a gametime decison on Sunday against Baltimore. If the rookie tailback is unable to play, Jamel White will be Cleveland's featured back with Benjamin Gay getting some looks in the backfield as well.   Correll Buckhalter , RB PHI  Updated 11/17/01 Buckhalter has been suspended for this weekend's game against Dallas. He is one of three Eagles who will be held out of the game. Brian Mitchell will likely serve as Duce Staley's backup.  Jamal Lewis , RB BAL  Updated 11/17/01 According to published reports, Lewis has been suspended for four games. Lewis' four-game suspension went into effect on Friday and he will not be allowed to work out or rehabilitate with the team for four weeks, or until Dec. 17. Instead, Lewis will work toward recovering from a torn ACL in Tennessee.   Tyrone Wheatley , RB OAK  Updated 11/16/01 Wheatley (knee) is out for Sunday's game with the Chargers. Charlie Garner will once again be Oakland's feature back. Zack Crockett may be used in goal-line situations.  Frank Wycheck , TE TEN  Updated 11/16/01 According to published reports, Wycheck is expected to play half of Sunday's game against Cincinnati. That makes him a risky start from a Fantasy perspective.  St! ev! e McNair , QB TEN  Updated 11/16/01 McNair's status is still in question for Sunday's game against Cincinnati due to an injured right thumb. He threw the ball during individual drills Friday, and according to published reports, is likely to play despite not being 100 percent. We don't recommend McNair this week as a result.  Emmitt Smith , RB DAL  Updated 11/16/01 Smith will return to the lineup Sunday against Philadelphia after missing two games with a sprained right knee. Cowboys Head Coach Dave Campo said after Friday's practice that Smith would "be ready to play the majority of the game." His return bumps Troy Hambrick to fullback, but we wouldn't recommend you use either back against the stingy Eagles rush defense.  Frank Sanders , WR ARI  Updated 11/16/01 Sanders (hamstring) was added to the NFL injury report on Friday and is now listed as questionable for Sunday's game against Detroit.  However, if you're completely desperate for a wideout in a larger league this week, Sanders' matchup against a vulnerable Detroit secondary is worth considering as long as he's able to play.    Chris Weinke , QB CAR  Updated 11/16/01 According to published reports, Weinke will be the starting quarterback for Sunday's game against San Francisco. However, he's not worth starting on your Fantasy team.   Daunte Culpepper , QB MIN  Updated 11/16/01 Culpepper is one pace for a good Fantasy season despite the lack of consistency in Minnesota's offense this season. He's one of the better quarterbacks in the league from a Fantasy perspective, and should be in your starting lineup on a weekly basis.   Cris Carter , WR MIN  Updated 11/16/01 Carter's numbers may be down somewhat this season, but he's still too good to ever consider benching. The veteran has a knack for finding the end zone, and should have a good game against rookie CB Will Allen and the Giants' secondary on Monday night.   Randy Moss , WR MIN  Updated 11/16/01 Moss is listed as probable for Monday's game against the N.Y. Giants due to an ankle injury. He's been underachieving this season, but it's almost impossible to bench him based on his potential to post solid Fantasy numbers.   Ricky Williams , RB NO  Updated 11/16/01 Williams is one of the better Fantasy backs in the league, and is a good player to use on a weekly basis. He'll face an Indianapolis defense that has been underachieving all season long, so Williams is a must-start.     Aaron Brooks , QB NO  Updated 11/16/01 Brooks had a big game against San Francisco last weekend, throwing for 347 yards and two scores. He may be a bit inconsistent this season, but his potential to post huge numbers makes it tough to bench him, especially against a vulnerable Indianapol! is! defense.    Willie Jackson , WR NO  Updated 11/16/01 Jackson put up a huge game against San Francisco last weekend, posting 11 catches and 167 yards receiving. He'll face a questionable Indianapolis squad that is vulnerable to the pass in Week 10, so starting Jackson this week is a solid option.   Stephen Davis , RB WAS  Updated 11/16/01 Davis has stepped up his play after beginning the season slowly. He's averaged 112 yards rushing over his last four games, and is once again emerging as a reliable Fantasy player. Give him the start in Week 10 against a De! nv! er defense that is vulnerable to high scoring games.   Tony Banks , QB WAS  Updated 11/16/01 Banks has played well of late, throwing five touchdowns in his last three games. He's got a good matchup this weekend against a Denver team that can be beaten through the air, but he's only worth considering in very deep Fantasy leagues.   Michael Westbrook , WR WAS  Updated 11/16/01 Westbrook has been inconsistent this season, but he has caught three touchdown passes in his last four games. He'll face a Denver secondary this weekend that is vulnerable at best, so starting him in deeper leagues is worth considering.   Rod Gardner , WR WAS  Updated 11/16/01 Gardner has been held in check in his last two games, catching only three passes for 38 yards. He does have a favorable matchup this weekend against Denver, however, so starting him is a good move.   Az-Zahir Hakim , WR STL  Updated 11/16/01 Hakim has been inconsi! st! ent in recent weeks, so starting him on your Fantasy team is a gamble unless the matchup is right. He'll go up against a tough New England secondary in Week Ten, so avoid using him outside of deeper leagues.   Torry Holt , WR STL  Updated 11/16/01 Holt continues to put up consistent yardage totals, but he's only scored only three touchdowns this season. He'll face a tough New England secondary this weekend, but he's still worth starting on your Fantasy team based on his potential to put up solid numbers.   Isaac Bruce , WR STL  Updated 11/16/01 Bruce hasn't put up the huge Fantasy totals this season, but he's still one of the better wideouts in the league. He'll face CB Ty Law and the formidable New England secondary, but he's still worth starting based on his potential for big numbers.   Marshall Faulk , RB STL  Updated 11/16/01 Faulk had a huge game against Carolina, proving that he is still the best Fantasy player in the league. He's a must-start every week, and should post solid numbers in Week 10 against New England.   Ernie Conwell , TE STL  Updated 11/16/01 Conwell has had! a! few down weeks, so starting him on your Fantasy team is somewhat of a gamble. With the lack of depth at tight end around the league, however, starting Conwell is something many Fantasy owners will have no choice but to do.   Richard Huntley , RB CAR  Updated 11/16/01 Huntley will be the likely starter this weekend against San Francisco, but don't be surprised if he splits carries with Nick Goings. Avoid starting either back in Week 10 if at all possible.   More Updates  [IMAGE]  Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc. Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com   FB40SP


I show five fixed for float swaps done for September Production.  The deal
numbers and prices follow:

   Deal #                 Vol         Swap Px           Resulting Customer Px
ES5823.20        5,000/d        $2.21                          $2.10
ES5823.21        5,000/d        $2.21                          $2.10
ES5823.30        10,000/d      $2.7475                     $2.5975
EW2883.1         10,000/d       $2.265                       $2.155
EW5406.1          5,000/d       $2.35
$2.15

Let me know if this clears everything up.

Eric
x3-0977

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           01/26/2000 11:17 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - 9/99 production - price

Eric,

Can you please help per Stephanie's note below.  The audit record shows that
you changed the tiered pricing on this Cabot deal for 9/99.  Both Stephanie
and myself thought that Cabot and HPL were in agreement on these prices for
September.  Can you provide insight into why the tiers were changed for this
month?

Thank you,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2000
11:14 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           01/26/2000 10:43 AM

To: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - 9/99 production - price

Melissa,

Someone has changed one of the price tiers on Cabot for 9/99 production.  Due
to the price change, it is now showing that I need to take a credit of $
52,996.72 from Cabot.  Is this correct or not????  I thought we had figured
the pricing out for 9/99 and Cabot had also agreed.  Please let me know if
the price change is correct or not, and if I need to take this credit from
Cabot.  See below the change that was made in Sitara and I am also showing
what we paid versus what is now showing up in the system.

Original payment ( per your email below )

          0  -  10,000  $2.1000
10,001  -  20,000  $2.1550
20,001  -  30,000  $2.5975
30,001  +  $2.7100

Change that has been made in system

          0  -  10,000  $2.1000
10,001  -  20,000  $2.1550
20,001  -  30,000  $2.5975
30,001  -  35,000  $2.1500
35,001  -  50,000  $2.7100

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           11/01/99 02:28 PM

To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - Amendment and Confirmations to
Contract dated 12/1/98

Shawna,

Per my voice mail, please add the following confirmations in addition to the
items you are sending to Cabot:

 Period of Delivery:  September 1999
 Price:    $2.7475
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   8/9/99

 Period of Delivery:  November 1999
 Price:    $2.925
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  5,000/d
 Date Agreed:   10/13/99

 Period of Delivery:  November 1999
 Price:    $2.9325
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   10/13/99

 Period of Delivery:  November 1999
 Price:    $2.935
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   10/20/99

Stephanie,

Below, please find the revised pricing matrix.  Please adjust Sitara and pay
Cabot accordingly:

SEPTEMBER:
0 - 10,000 HSC fixed at $2.21 $2.21-$0.11= $2.10  Have deal ticket
10,001 - 20,000 HSC fixed at $2.10 $2.265-$0.11= $2.155  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
20,001 - 30,000 HSC fixed at $2.7475 $2.7475-$0.15= $2.5975  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
30,001+      $2.91-$0.20= $2.71  Per original contract

NOVEMBER:
0 - 5,000 HSC fixed at $2.925 $2.925-$0.11= $2.815  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
5,001 - 15,000 HSC fixed at $2.9325 $2.9325-$0.11= $2.8225  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
15,001 - 20,000 HSC fixed at $2.935 $2.935-$0.11= $2.825  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
20,001   -  25,000 HSC fixed at $2.935 $2.935-$0.15= $2.785  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
25,001 - 30,000    $HSC -$0.15= $PRICE  Per original contract
30,001+      $HSC-$0.20= $PRICE  Per original contract

Thank you,
Melissa Graves
X39173
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT on 11/01/99 02:15
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           10/18/99 11:16 AM

To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp. - Amendment and Confirmations to
Contract dated 12/1/98

Shawna,

Per my voice mail, please send the amendment to the above referenced
contract, to allow for Flexible Pricing transactions.  (Jill Zivley has
reviewed and approved the draft amendment.)  Please also attach confirmations
with the following details regarding Flexible Pricing deals that have been
done with Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corp.:

 Period of Delivery:  May 1999
 Price:    $2.035
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   3/7/99

 Period of Delivery:  Jun 1999 - Aug 1999
 Price:    $2.10
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  5,000/d
 Date Agreed:   4/8/99

 Period of Delivery:  Jun 1999 - Aug 1999
 Price:    $2.05
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  5,000/d
 Date Agreed:   4/7/99

 Period of Delivery:  Jun 1999 - Sept 1999
 Price:    $2.21
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   5/12/99

 Period of Delivery:  Sept 1999
 Price:    $2.265
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  10,000/d
 Date Agreed:   4/22/99

 Period of Delivery:  Oct 1999
 Price:    $2.565
 Flexible Pricing Volume:  15,000/d
 Date Agreed:   7/26/99

The address for Cabot is:

Cabot Oil & Gas Marketing Corporation
P. O. Box 4544
Houston, Texas  77210

Stephanie,

Below, please find the revised pricing matrix.  Please adjust Sitara and pay
Cabot accordingly:

MAY:
0 - 10,000 HSC fixed at $2.035 $2.035-$0.11= $1.925  Have deal ticket
10,001 - 20,000    $2.35 - $0.11= $2.24   Per original contract
20,001  - 30,000    $2.35 - $0.15= $2.20  Per original contract
30,001+      $2.35 - $0.20= $2.15  Per original contract

JUNE AND JULY AND AUGUST (same for both months):
0 - 5,000 HSC fixed at $2.05 $2.05-$0.11= $1.94  Have deal ticket
5,001 - 10,000 HSC fixed at $2.10 $2.10-$0.11= $1.99  Have deal ticket
10,001 - 20,000 HSC fixed at $2.21 $2.21-$0.11= $2.10  Have deal ticket
20,001 - 30,000    $2.24-$0.15= $2.09 June Per original contract
      $2.29-$0.15= $2.14 July Per original contract
      $2.62-$0.15= $2.47 August Per original contract
30,001+      $2.24-$0.20= $2.04 June Per original contract
      $2.29-$0.20= $2.09 July Per original contract
      $2.62-$0.20= $2.42 August Per original contract
SEPTEMBER:
0 - 10,000 HSC fixed at $2.21 $2.21-$0.11= $2.10  Have deal ticket
10,001 - 20,000 HSC fixed at $2.10 $2.265-$0.11= $2.155  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
20,001 - 30,000    $2.91-$0.15= $2.76  Per original contract
30,001+      $2.91-$0.20= $2.71  Per original contract

OCTOBER:
0 - 15,000 HSC fixed at $2.565 $2.565-$0.11= $2.455  Per deal ticket,
requested copy
15,001 - 20,000    $2.54-$0.11= $2.43  Per original contract
20,001 - 30,000    $2.54-$0.15= $2.39  Per original contract
30,001+      $2.54-$0.20= $2.34  Per original contract

Thank you,
Melissa Graves
X39173


Mick,

FYI,

vlt
x3-6353
---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001
05:28 PM ---------------------------

Jerry Bubert@ENRON
02/21/2001 01:03 PM
To: Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, JoAnne Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, Gerald
Lofton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M
Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Crosstex Energy Services-Camden Res.,Driscoll Ranch, Meters
9868,9858, GPA dated 9/28/00

Crosstex has elected the base contract price (IF HSC less $0.10) for all gas
produced from the above wells for the term 3/1/01-3/31/01.  JAB


Amy,
Could you please sign up Bert Meyers, Mark Guzman, and Kate Symes for the pilot program.
Thanks,
Bill


This is fine, but keep in mind we only use the GISB for 30 days firm and can use it indefinitely for interruptible. Let me know and I will draft a GISB for your customer.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Singer, John
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:40 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	New producer

Debra,
I plan on purchasing October gas from a new producer, CDX Gas, with offices in Dallas, TX.  The gas is on CGas in West Virginia.  I will be purchasing the gas at a CGas Interconnect.  Pricing will based on Gas Daily.
Would a GISB contract work for this transaction?
John


maybe this can be our stud LB

http://longhornlink.rivals.com/default.asp?sid=798&p=3&sp=1&lid=1&pl=-13500


I will pass on it.  Thanks.  Mark

	Louise Kitchen
	03/30/2001 07:49 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Houston

I don't suppose you have any interest in meeting them - but I thought I would
offer.

---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2001
07:48 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "GRIFFIN, PAUL" <Paul.Griffin@herbertsmith.com>
   03/30/2001 06:59 AM

To: "'marcus.nettleton@enron.com'" <marcus.nettleton@enron.com>,
"'louise.kitchen@enron.com'" <louise.kitchen@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Houston

Marcus and Louise

How are you?  I hope all is well and I wanted to let you know that I will be
in Houston at the end of next week with, probably, a couple of my colleagues
and I wondered if you might have any time to get together.

Depending on schedules, I should be with Alan Jowett who is head of our
energy practice, Stephane Brabant who heads our civil law energy practice in
Paris and Ralf Thaeter who leads the energy practice of Gleiss Lutz, the
German firm with whom we have a formal relationship.

We should be around from late on Wednesday 4th April until late afternoon on
Friday 6th April and it would be splendid if we were able to get some time
with you and, if you thought it appropriate, any of your colleagues who
would be interested to meet us.

Could I trouble you to let me know if there are any times that would suit?

Best wishes

Paul

PS We finished a NETA-related deal opposite an Enron team led by Ali Lloyd
and Paul Simons at about 1.30 am on Tuesday!

Paul

________________________________________________________________________

This message is confidential and may be covered by legal professional
privilege.  If you have received this message in error, please delete
it from your system. If you require assistance, please contact our
London IT helpdesk.  Thank you.
(e-mail helpdesk@herbertsmith.com; phone +44 (0)20 7333 8888).

Herbert Smith is an international law firm with offices in London,
Bangkok, Beijing, Brussels, Hong Kong, Moscow, Paris, Singapore and Tokyo.
Further information
about the firm, and a list of the partners and their professional
qualifications,
is available from Exchange House, Primrose Street, London EC2A 2HS, any of our
offices and from our website at http://www.herbertsmith.com/

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/


Assuming the test results are good, the move from the CES desks to the
appropriate ENA desks will take place either Wednesday or Thursday evening:

 CES - IM East   to ENA - IM East
 CES - IM Central  ENA - IM Central
 CES - IM Texas   ENA - IM Texas

This move will be done systematically for January forward business.  After
this move is complete, there should be no active deals remaining on the CES
desks.  The following is a list of deals that I wanted to bring to your
attention and review.  One of the base assumptions expressed by all was that
there were no transport usage tickets booked on the CES desk.  This is not
true; however transport usage tickets will be included in the change over;
therefore this will not be a problem.  On the East desk, three desk to desk
deals will not be able to be converted (see below).  Once all CES deals have
been changed to the East desk, I would imagine that these three desk to desk
deals need to be killed.

Please advise if there are any questions regarding the desk move.  If any
desk prefers to leave January as is and have deals moved February forward,
manual deal entry will be involved (ending the deals as of 01/31/99 on the
CES desk and creating a new deal on the appropriate physical desk).

SRM (x33548)

The data below is as of 01/24/00 7:00 PM


The file actually does include all of the data.  Just scroll to the left when you open it.

Thanks,
Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:50 PM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:


Tana:

None of the following CPs are authorized to trade US power -- restricted by
credit:

Androscoggin Energy LLC
DSM Hydrocarbons America
PanCanadian Energy Services Inc. -- if credit opens them up in the future, we
will open up as well since this is a current power CP
Transok Gas, LLC

****************

No change to profile for Sacremento MUD - West only pursuant to WSPP


What do these changes do to you?  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000 03:49 PM
---------------------------

Regan M Smith
07/05/2000 08:53 AM
To: Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Randy Rippentrop/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Beverly Fennessy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan S Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark J
Leskowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Shieh/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Louie
Truong/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M
Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott
Williamson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jun Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simon Sear/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Kevin T Dinh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry
Sanvido/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pamela Lebrane/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Schomer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Lana Yu/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jaikishore Bharathi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Ogg/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: SAP / Global/ Unify replication problem on Friday June 30th

On Friday June 30th, Unify's production performance was impacted by a large
volume (30k) of replication/ configuration transactions from SAP.
The mass update from SAP to Global/ Unify effected Enron's business
throughout the afternoon, causing contract replication to be delayed, and
missed nominations.

Corrective actions taken to ensure this does not occur again:
Global Replication - Move the SAP to Global/ Unify replication for
Intercompany from hourly to a nightly (1:00 am) process.  As we could miss
new data setup dependencies, the volume is expected to be reduced.
SAP Support - SAP IT support will notify Global systems of any scheduled
'rebuilds'/ mass updates to monitor/ move the schedule during an off-peak
time.

Regan Smith, x39291
Manager, Unify Accounting
Unify/ SAP Interface


----- Forwarded by Tom Briggs/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 08:01 AM -----

	RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
	10/25/2000 07:51 AM

		 To: tom.briggs@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: CEA Update Bad News

Senator Gramm's staff presented to the Senate Ag Committee Republican and
Democratic staff and the Democratic staff of the Senate Banking Committee,
Gramm's proposed changes to the CEA bill. This proposal is quite lengthy,
and includes many amendments most of which were previously discussed with
the House Agriculture Committee, some of which were included in House
Agriculture Committee Saturday Night Draft of 10/8/00. Because of the length
of the document we have only attached the summary that the Gramm staff
provided. In separate e-mails to follow we will send only the pages of the
House-passed bill that were changed by the Gramm proposal. As you know  some
of these provisions include matters objectionable to
Treasury, SEC, CFTC, Chicago and New York Exchanges. Essentially the Gramm
staff has included proposals which would allow retail and agency
transactions as well as language designed to solve the Blackbird problem.
As you also know the view of the Agencies and the Ag Comm is that  some of
these exclusions create loopholes which can allow some market participants
to avoid the new Single Stock Futures regulatory design, the CFTC oversight
of the energy market, and go far beyond the recommendations of the
President's Working Group.
The staffs of the Banking and Agriculture Committees have agreed to meet
tomorrow late morning. We believe at that time the Agriculture Committee
will propose a counter-offer which while addressing the Gramm major concerns
will not adopt his proposal but instead rely on the Treasury proposals. If
Senator Gramm is willing to work off this alternative a negotiation may
result, otherwise it is unlikely that any agreement with Gramm will be
reached. The Agriculture Committee is disinclined to repeat the debates held
in the House Agriculture Comm. consideration of the bill. We welcome your
reaction to the proposal. If you have questions or comments
please do not hesitate to call Mary (973-5907), or George (973-5920). <<Gramm
Summary.pdf>>

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Gramm Summary.pdf


Dear GERALD R NEMEC,

Thank you for your order. We are currently reviewing for completeness and
accuracy.
A separate email with your Dell Order number(s) will be sent to you after the
order is processed.

A recap of your order is provided at the end of this message for your
reference.
We encourage you to verify, print, and retain the information on this page
for your records.

Date Submitted: 1/16/01 3:38:38 PM

If at any time you have questions regarding your order please contact your
Dell Sales Representative:

Name:  EPP Sales
Email: US_EPP_Clickathome@dell.com
Phone: 866-220-3355

Again, thank you for your order. We appreciate you buying from Dell and using
your Dell Premier Pages Service.

Sincerely,
Dell Premier Pages Service

Shopping cart includes 1 unique item(s)
Total Price: $349.00

Item Detail#:1
Dimension L Series (Required)--Dimension® L866r, Pentium® III
Processor at 866 MHz

Memory:                                  256MB SDRAM, 1 DIMM
Keyboard:                                QuietKey® Keyboard
Monitor:                                 17" (16.0 viewable, .28dp) E770
Monitor
Video Card:                              Intel 3D AGP Graphics
Hard Drive:                              20GB Ultra ATA Hard Drive (7200 RPM)
Floppy Drive:                            1.44MB Floppy Drive
Operating System:                        NEW Microsoft® Windows®
2000 Professional
Mouse:                                   Logitech First Mouse+ Wheel (PS/2v)
Network Card:                            Integrated Intel&#17410/100 Ethernet
Controller
Modem:                                   V.90/56K PCI DataFax Modem for
Windows
CD/DVD ROM Drive:                        NEW 8X/4X/32X CD-RW Drive
Sound Card:                              Soundblaster 64V Integrated
Speakers:                                Altec Lansing ACS-340 Speakers with
Subwoofer
Bundled Software:                        Microsoft® Office 2000 Small
Business
Norton Antivirus&#174 at no additional charge:     Norton Antivirus&#174 2000
Hardware Support Services:               3Yrs Parts & Labor (Next Business
Day)
Software and Peripherals:                Program Management Services

Single Item Cost: $349.00
Quantity: 1
Sub-Total for Item: $349.00
___________________

** END OF ORDER **


Notice No. 02-03
January 7, 2002

TO:		All COMEX Division Members/Member Firms
All COMEX Division Clearing Members
All COMEX Division Floor Traders
All COMEX Division Operations Managers

FROM:	Michael Campanelli, Vice President
		Floor Operations / COMEX Division

RE:		Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the Trading
Floor and Clearing
Members - Shortened Hours
____________________________________________________________________________
__

The expiration date for the February 2002 options contract for Silver (SO
G2) and Gold (OG G2) is Friday, January 11, 2002.

GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized on-line
trade entry ("OLTE") system trained representative available until released
by the Exchange staff.  All adjustments  and/or corrections, must be
accompanied by relevant supporting documentation prior to being incorporated
into expiration processing, in essence making the expiration processing an
extension of the afternoon trade resolution procedures.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110) and Trade Processing (299-2465 and 299-2044)
personnel will be available to assist with the processing of notices of
Exercise and Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other
questions or problems you may have.

Failure by any Clearing Member or qualified Floor Trader to comply with
procedures as outlined herein may result in severe disciplinary action by
the Exchange and potential financial liability to customers or members for
failure to exercise diligence in the processing of information.

TRADING FLOOR OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The following schedule of operational procedures is based on the previously
announced shortened trading hours.

Trading in the February 2002 Silver and Gold Options Contracts will cease at
1:25 P.M. and 1:30 P.M. respectively on January 11, 2002.  All Brokers and
Traders must inform their Clearing Members of their intentions to exercise
or abandon such Options by 3:30 P.M.

On Friday, January 11, 2002, all Brokers and Clearing Members must have a
duly authorized, On-Line Trade Entry ("OLTE") system trained representative
available until such time as the Exchange deems necessary.

NOTE:	After 4:00 P.M. all expiring option trade data must be inputted on
special "OLTE" terminals located in the Trade Processing Room.  Any other
means of submission will be rejected by the Exchange.  Members will be able
to submit all other trade data until 4:30 P.M.

After the Unmatched Trade Reports and the Preliminary Spot Month Matched
Trade Reports are displayed, Clearing Member representatives will be able to
pick up their Preliminary Clearing reports at the Clearing Department.

A final review of all submissions will be made.  The Supervisor of the Trade
Processing Room will detain only those Clearing Members and/or Broker
representatives involved.  All final corrections will be made at this time
and upon determination of the Supervisor that all option processing is
complete, all representatives will be released.

Exchange Reports based on Friday's submissions and processing will be
available on Monday morning January 14, 2002.

In the event that you have any questions regarding these trading floor
procedures please contact Michael Campanelli at (212) 299-2072 or David
Sherman at (212) 299-2061.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

1.	OPEN POSITION CONFIRMATION ("OPC") - The OPC should reflect as
accurately as possible all futures and options gross positions as of
close-of business on the business day prior to expiration.  Review the
estimated current gross positions as shown and make appropriate adjustments.
The OPC must be submitted not later than 9:00 A.M.

2.  	OPTIONS EXERCISE/ABANDONMENT REQUESTS FORM ("E/A") - An expiring
option with a strike price in-the-money by one tick or more will be subject
to automatic exercise unless an Option Abandonment Request form is submitted
advising that a Clearing Member ("CM") elects to abandon some or all of its
position in that strike price (i.e., for the option series).  All other
options series in the expiring month will be subject to automatic
abandonment unless an Option Exercise Request form is submitted.  When
submitting an E/A form, please note the following:

(a)	An E/A form must be submitted not later than 4:00 PM.
(b)	Do not submit an Exercise form for positions in strike prices which
are subject to automatic
		Exercise nor submit an Abandonment form for positions in
strike prices which are subject to automatic abandonment.
(c)	If a CM wishes to submit an E/A form to abandon a position in a
strike price subject to automatic exercise or wishes to exercise a position
in a strike price which is out of the money, it is necessary to notify
Clearing by telephone of such anticipated action.  The CM must have an
officer available to confirm such intention.
(d)	CMs may secure from Clearing a time-stamped receipt of the CM copy
to assure submission 	of the CM's E/A forms.

3.	OPTION POSITION REDUCTION REQUEST FORM ("OPRR") - As a general rule,
purchases and sales of option contracts are presumed to be new business.
If some or all of your purchases and sales are in fact undertaken for
position liquidation purposes, OPRR forms may be submitted on the day of
expiration and will be used in conjunction with trade data to reduce your
projected position in an expiring contract.  OPRR requests in excess of
actual traded volume will be rejected.  Exception: Cabinet trades and cancel
correction trades will automatically liquidate existing positions, therefore
do not submit an OPRR form for cabinet or cancel correction trades.
The OPRR form must be submitted not later than 4:00 PM.

4.	HOUSE/CUSTOMER POSITION TRANSFER REQUEST FORM ("H/C") - H/C forms
may be used only to transfer previously cleared contracts between a CM's
house and customer accounts.  Problem trades (those which have not cleared
prior to expiration day) must be corrected using COMEX's on-line trade entry
system under the direct supervision of the Trade Audits Department of COMEX
("Trade Audits").  The H/C form must be submitted not later than 2:30 PM.

5.	EX-PIT POSITION TRANSFER REQUEST FORM ("Ex-Pit") - Ex Pit forms may
be used only to transfer previously cleared contracts between CMs.  Problem
trades (those which have not cleared prior to expiration day) must be
corrected on the on-line trade entry system under the direct supervision of
Trade Audits.  The Ex-Pit form must be submitted not later than 2:30 PM.

	*****
A)	At approximately 3:15 PM, two PRELIMINARY reports of the expiration
process will be available for distribution at the NYMEX Clearing Department:
1.	OPTION EXPIRATION REPORT AND CONFIRMATION - The purpose of this
report is to project the CM's present position going into the expiration
based upon the transactions which have already been submitted to Clearing.
CMs should review and modify their adjusted gross positions as of
close-of-business on the business day prior to expiration.  Further
adjustments may be submitted not later than 4:00 PM.  The projected ending
gross positions will reflect transactions accepted or rejected for clearance
on expiration night, inclusive of Ex-Pit, H/C and OPRR transactions which
have been submitted to Clearing prior to 2:30 PM, and trade information
submitted to COMEX prior to 2:45 PM.  Normally, this report will also
reflect manually submitted Exercise and Abandonment instructions, the
projected number of exercises and maximum potential assignments for each
strike price, the type of exercise (manual or automatic), whether the strike
is In, At or Out of the money, and the exercise value associated therewith
based on settlement prices established by COMEX on the day of expiration.

2.	TRANSACTION LISTING - This listing will include in detail all
expiring option trades submitted to COMEX prior to 2:45 PM on expiration
day, and all H/C, ExPit, OPRR and E/A transactions submitted to Clearing
Prior to 2:30 PM.

Please note: Trade information reflected on the option expiration report and
transaction listing are trades submitted only. To inquire whether trades
have matched, each CM must review the trade reports provided by COMEX's
On-Line Trade Entry ("OLTE") system.

B)	At approximately 4:30 PM, FINAL reports of the expiration process,
including all submissions to Clearing and trade information submitted to
COMEX made by 4:30 PM, will be available for distribution at the NYMEX
Clearing Department.

C)	At 4:45 PM, Preliminary In The Money Abandonment and Out Of The
Money Exercise information will be announced on Fast Facts.

D)	At Approximately 6:30 PM, a Final Notice of Exercise/Assignments
will be available in each CM's lockbox located at the NYMEX Clearing
Department.  Each CM which has exercised or been assigned one or more
options will receive a separate statement showing exercises and/or
assignments for each option series.  Please check this statement carefully.
Although long options positions in-the-money by one tick or more will be
automatically exercised, not all short option positions will be assigned if
there are any options manually abandoned at such strike prices.  Please note
that there also may be some at or out-of-the money options being exercised.

E)	At approximately 7:30 PM, the final set of clearing sheets will be
available in each CM's lockbox located at the NYMEX Clearing Department.

It is strongly recommended that each CM have a representative(s) that is
properly trained to handle the option expiration process available beginning
at 3:15 PM and who will receive the CM's reports at the specific times.  It
is solely the responsibility of the CM to review these reports and to notify
the Clearing staff immediately of any discrepancies.

To obtain the exact time of the availability for each report, clearing
members should call (212) 301-4871, access code 701.  The announcement time
will occur 1/2 hour prior to availability.

Attached please find a Clearing Member Procedure Summary for ease of
reference.  Please contact Anthony DiBenedetto at (212) 299-2152 or John
Ramos at (212) 299-2142 if you have any questions.

 <<OPTIEXPI(ShortndSchdl)-Z01.xls>>

 - OPTIEXPI(ShortndSchdl)-Z01.xls


SYSTEM WARNING CANCELLATION [200000212]

Effective 08/26/2000 at 19:00 the California Independent System Operator
has terminated the "Warning" of the Electrical Emergency Plan.

The "Warning"  has been in effect since Sat Aug 26 15:00:00 2000 PDT.

This message is from Market Operations  at the California ISO.

This notice cancels notice 200000207

Notice issued at: 08/26/2000 19:10


How about coming up after lunch tomorrow to wrap up CSN?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vela, Valerie
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:13 PM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	Heartland Steel revised....

 << File: Heartland Steel Recon.xls >>

Valerie Vela
Specialist, Gas Settlements
Enron Net Works LLC
t: 713.345.8749
f: 713.646.8420


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Wadle, Susan
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 9:15 AM
To:	McGee, Johnny; Cebryk, Doug; Gadd, Eric; Matthews, Ron; Alters, Dennis; Watson, Kimberly; Campbell, Larry; Taylor, Gina; Lokey, Teb; Veatch, Stephen
Subject:	EB15C1 for Monday's Sun Devil Meeting from 3-4
Importance:	High

We have this room reserved though facilities for the rest of the year.


Les,
Last night 6/6 Dave Mitchel called at 17:45 to say he would be generating 3mw at 18:30.  I told him I'd start selling the 3's for HE:20 and if there were any problems or any changes to give me a call.   After I had already sold the 3's and bought transmission hour by hour for a couple of hours, Dave called me at 21:45 to say they would be coming on in 5 minutes.  So we sold 20,21,&22 for frontier when they were not generating.
Eric


The TW LFT Overrun Request form has been reviewed by Susan and the final form
is attached below for your records.

 Toby, can you post this document for TW on the  web site under access forms?

Thanks Ramona


Kim and John,
     I assumed that we'd moved away from that point in favor of the right to match.  Is that not the case?
Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Wilkie, Kim
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:23 AM
To: McCarty, Danny; Millar, John
Subject: RE: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?

Dan, are we no longer requiring a covenant re: not using the ROW for gas pipeline activity?

Thanks, Kim

-----Original Message-----
From: McCarty, Danny
Sent: Tue 10/9/2001 9:04 AM
To: Wilkie, Kim; Millar, John
Cc:
Subject: RE: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?

Kim and John,
     I agree with Kim's second point.  I don't know how Ballentine's language works--there doesn't seem to be an offer and acceptance of anything specific.  I'd like to at least have a contract that has either been negotiated with the third party of the ability to negotiate it myself.  Can we clean this language up a little?

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Wilkie, Kim
Sent:   Monday, October 08, 2001 1:17 PM
To:     Millar, John
Cc:     McCarty, Danny
Subject:        RE: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?

Thanks John.  For your convenience in reviewing the language, I have attached a redline copy that shows the changes that John made to our original language.  Regarding his changes:

1.      A big omission in his new section is the covenant  not to construct or cause to be constructed a natural gas pipeline within the right of way.  I thought that was a covenant we wanted.  If that is not the business deal, then the change is fine.

2.      I think a 10 business days is fine.  That being said, you usually don't indicate an acceptance of a right to match with the payment of the purchase offer.  We could submit a binding acceptance but I don't think we want to agree to pay the purchase price when all that Ballentine may put in front of us is a term sheet with the specifics of the deal to be negotiated.  I also don't think we want to go to the trouble of escrowing the money.  Maybe we could do an earnest money deposit but then we need to add language as to when we get it back.  (If you and Danny want to keep the submission of the purchase price, we need to include the language as to when we get the money back as well.)  The easiest fix for this deal is just saying we will submit a binding acceptance to their offer.

Let me know your thoughts.  Kim

 << File: right to match ballentine red.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Millar, John
Sent:   Monday, October 08, 2001 11:32 AM
To:     Wilkie, Kim; McCarty, Danny
Subject:        FW: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?
Importance:     High

Here's John's response to the Right-to-Match language.  His client's main interest is in participating in the construction of new assets, which is the purpose of the last sentence.  This seems reasonable to me.  Dan suggested ten days response time, which John is agreeable to.  Please advise if we can work with this.

Kim, I believe I have the schedules, which I will fax to you for scanning.

Thanks,
John

 -----Original Message-----
From:   "John Ballentine" <jballentine@id3energy.com>@ENRON
Sent:   Monday, October 08, 2001 9:48 AM
To:     Millar, John
Subject:        RE: Agreement NEW LANGUAGE?
Importance:     High

John- try this on for size...I haven't vetted it on my end yet, but see how
you feel about it:

Section 4.06  Right to Match.
Buyer agrees that within one year of the Date of this Agreement if it
receives a bona fide offer (the "Purchase Offer") to acquire the right to
construct or to place into service natural gas and/or liquid pipelines
within the Company's right-of-way, Buyer will first, by written notice to
Seller, offer to Seller the right to construct or to place into service
natural gas and/or liquid pipelines within the Company's right-of-way on the
same terms and conditions as the Purchase Offer (the "ROFR Offer").  The
written notice provided by Buyer shall state (i) that Buyer has received the
Purchase Offer and intends to accept such Purchase Offer and (ii) the terms
and conditions of the Purchase Offer.  Seller shall have five (5) business
days from receipt of the ROFR Offer to indicate its willingness to match the
Purchase Offer by submitting by wire transfer to Buyer's designated bank
account the Purchase Offer in immediately available funds..  If Seller does
not indicate its willingness to match the Purchase Offer or does not respond
within five (5) days, then Buyer may consummate the transaction with the
counterparty, provided that the transaction consummated with counterparty is
on the same terms and conditions set forth in the ROFR Offer.  If the
transaction with counterparty is modified in any respect from that set forth
in the ROFR Offer, the modified terms and conditions shall be deemed to
constitute a new Purchase Offer and Seller shall be entitled to a new right
to match the Purchase Offer as set forth above in this Section 4.06.  In the
event that Seller matches the Purchase Offer by submitting funds to Buyers
designated bank account, Seller shall assume all other terms and conditions
of the Purchase Offer, including, but not limited to, any limitations,
restrictions or preferences of the selection of the construction company or
any other contractors normally associated with the construction, operation
and maintenance of gas and liquid pipelines.

-----Original Message-----
From: Millar, John [ <mailto:John.Millar@ENRON.com>]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 7:33 AM
To: jballentine@id3energy.com
Subject: Agreement

 <<PSA v4 10-04-.doc>>

Hey John.  Kim sent me this new version over the weekend.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
********************************************************************** <<
File: PSA v4 10-04-.doc >>

 - winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>


-----Original Message-----
From: IssueAlert@SCIENTECH.COM [mailto:IssueAlert@SCIENTECH.COM]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:48 AM
To: ISSUEALERTHTML@LISTSERV.SCIENTECH.COM
Subject: Jurisdictional Disputes Intensify As FERC Seeks to Extend Its Authority

Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/customer-carebanner.jpg>

SCIENTECH is currently interviewing 1,500 utilities on CIS/CRM and customer care
in the United States and Canada to determine:

The leading software providers
Drivers of utility technology decisions
Analysis of license sales versus ASP sales
New market opportunities
Growing/shrinking software markets

Download a sample prospectus for an introduction to this new survey at: <http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Multi_Client.asp> and
contact Jon Brock at 505-244-7607 for more details.

The Center for Public Utilities and The National Association of Regulatory
Utility Commissioners present:

THE BASICS:

 <http://cpu.nmsu.edu/>

Hands-on framework that shows the interrelationships of the topics and how they
fit together and provides a set of analytical skills required to understand the issues.
October 14-19, 2001 in Albuquerque, NM.
Contact Jeanette Walter at jeawalte@nmsu.edu <mailto:jeawalte@nmsu.edu> for more information.

  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/scientech_logo_small.jpg>
  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/IssueAlert_Logo_188.jpg>

October 15, 2001

Jurisdictional Disputes Intensify
As FERC Seeks to Extend Its Authority

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

  <http://secure.scientech.com/rci/wsimages/will100border_copy.jpg>

[News item from Dow Jones] The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) kicks off a week of workshops today as part of its effort to reframe rules requiring utilities to turn control of their power-grid assets to independent management. The controversial effort to carve up the nation's electricity system under control of four or five regional transmission organizations (RTOs) is a top objective for FERC Chairman Pat Wood III. The workshops, dubbed "RTO Week," were called by FERC to garner what Wood calls "buy in" for the effort, which is encountering stiff opposition from some utilities, state regulators and members of Congress.

Analysis: The objective of this week's workshops may be to gain support from the industry for FERC's controversial mandate, but they are also having the effect of casting light on what is a growing debate over FERC's jurisdictional boundaries. The issue has become rather evenly divided. On one side, critics say that FERC has gone too far in its most recent RTO order, which as noted has become somewhat of a "cause c?l?bre" for new Chairman Wood. On the other hand, supporters say Wood has breathed new life into the commission and is taking an important step to ensure equal access for all power suppliers into the nation's transmission system. By Wood's own directive, the discrepancy over how far FERC can extend its regulatory oversight into what were previously considered state or utility matters is reaching a boiling point, as a Dec. 15 deadline that carries stiff penalties for resistant utilities is fast approaching.

Certainly, the arrival of Pat Wood as FERC chairman (after replacing Curt H?bert last month) has signaled a new era for the federal commission, which oversees much of the energy industry's wholesale market and the nation's power grid. As noted, Pat Wood has made the formation of RTOs one of his key objectives. Wood recently demonstrated that FERC would become much more interventionist when he declared a deadline of Dec. 15, by which time transmission-owning electric utilities across the country must submit plans to join an existing RTO in one of four large regional entities. Using what he has referred to as a "big stick," Wood warned that failing to comply with the Dec. 15 deadline would cost transmission-owning utilities their right to charge market-based rates for power and could delay any merger proceedings in which the utilities might become engaged.

This issue alone has drawn a line in the sand, but has also sparked an intense debate on the regulatory power that FERC should be given in the deregulating energy market. Standing up to lead the effort to put more constraints on FERC's authority are many state regulatory officials and congressional leaders, who view the commission as stepping into areas in which they traditionally have been the sole jurisdictional gatekeepers. State regulators, particularly from Southern states where electricity prices remain comparatively low, argue that that their system is working just fine the way it is. Such states want to retain their present regulatory oversight (rather than completely forfeit control of these assets over to FERC), and also believe that now is not the time to be making huge changes to the way in which the nation's transmission system is managed. Also in question is the extent to which regulatory conflicts may arise between state and federal commissioners if FERC is successful in mandating very large and broad RTOs that transcend state boundaries.

Southern Company is one utility that has refuted FERC's authority to force it to participate in an RTO. In its July order, FERC directed Southern Company (along with the Southwest Power Pool, Entergy Corp. and Grid South) to form a single RTO for the Southeast region, most likely adopting a structure modeled after Grid South. However, Southern Company already has sunk about $3 billion into its own 26,000-mile system, over which it wants to retain independent control.

FERC has said that the formation of regional RTOs will result in significant cost savings for customers because the barriers to competitively priced electricity will be removed and transmission costs will be reduced. However, Southern Company claims that the cost to establish a large regional RTO could run as high as $100 million, which could be passed on to customers in the form of higher rates. Southern also disagrees with FERC from a philosophical point of view and questions whether or not the commission's vision of four regional RTOs will truly make transmission activity more efficient. One of Southern's concerns is that the four regional RTOs could become too large and end up operating like monopolies. Ironically, the issue has caused dissension between Southern and its former subsidiary Mirant, which as an independent power producer seeks equal access to the transmission grid. While Southern disagrees with FERC's authority to force RTO participation, Mirant supports the federal government's efforts to streamline transmission activity.

Leaders of RTO West-the transmission entity in which FERC wants to include the transmission assets of states in the Northwest, Southwest and California-also question the value of a large regional entity and are resisting FERC's authority to mandate this structure. Leaders in the region have said that the formation of RTO West would result in substantially higher rates, considering that the Northwest transmission grid currently lacks the capacity to meet high demand in the area. In other words, although FERC may be endorsing market-based rates for those transmission-owning utilities that join RTOs, some transmission grids remain unstable and may not be ready for increased activity.

Nevertheless, along with Mirant stand fellow generating companies such as Dynegy and Enron, which have sunk billions into building merchant facilities and want to ensure that they have access to transmission systems. Hence, these companies agree with FERC's emphasis on RTO formations, as generation companies want to ensure that control of transmission facilities is moved from utilities to independent management companies.

In addition to the RTO issue, the bankruptcy proceedings of Pacific Gas & Electric Co. have also brought the issue of state versus federal jurisdictional authority to a head. The utility's parent PG&E Corp. is pursuing a "ring fencing" strategy in the restructuring related to the bankruptcy proceedings of Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Put simply, PG&E Corp. is trying to protect other valuable assets by transferring them into a new, federally regulated subsidiary. The restructuring plan has raised jurisdictional issues because the California Public Utility Commission, which presently regulates the utility operations of Pacific Gas & Electric Co., believes that it has the right to approve the transfer of assets into a new subsidiary. Further, the state government in California believes that PG&E Corp.'s plan would give too much regulatory control to FERC, and by the same token reduce the amount of control that California would have over generation assets that are presently contained in a regulated subsidiary.

The complicated issues surrounding how far FERC should be allowed to extend its regulatory authority are presently working their way through the federal legal system. In fact, last week the Supreme Court began hearing arguments from federal lawyers, state regulators and private industry, addressing not only FERC's authority to mandate RTOs but also the commission's 1996 order that required utilities to provide equal access to their transmission systems. Measures are also moving through Congress that would clarify the Federal Power Act to explicitly give FERC the authority to mandate participation in an RTO. At present, the commission had danced around the issue by calling for "voluntary" participation, yet still affixing stiff penalties for utilities that refuse to comply.

In addition, Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), chairman of the Energy and Air Quality Subcommittee, is reportedly working on a broad electric restructuring bill that he hopes to introduce during this congressional session (which could prove difficult as legislators want to close the current session by early November). Barton is a strong supporter of RTOs, and his draft bill reportedly would give FERC the ability to order RTO membership for public and private utilities that own power lines. At the same time, however, it is believed that Barton's draft bill would give utilities the option for an expedited federal court hearing if they disagree with FERC's order, which again would further temper the extent to which FERC has unrestricted authority on transmission issues.

Moreover, Congress and federal courtrooms may be the best venues for this debate over FERC's authority as disputes between state and federal regulatory oversight are sure to increase as thorny deregulation issues emerge. However, given FERC's deadline of Dec. 15 for RTO participation, the issue has gained a sense of urgency as big utilities such as Southern Company dig in their heels and rebuff the federal commission's mandate.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com <http://secure.scientech.com/issuealert/>

We encourage our readers to contact us with their comments. We look forward to hearing from you. Nancy Spring  <mailto:nspring@scientech.com>

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Jane Pelz  <mailto:jpelz@scientech.com>. Advertising opportunities are also available on our Website.

Our staff is comprised of leading energy experts with diverse backgrounds in utility generation, transmission & distribution, retail markets, new technologies, I/T, renewable energy, regulatory affairs, community relations and international issues. Contact consulting@scientech.com <http://consulting@scientech.com> or call Nancy Spring at 1-505-244-7613.

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this e-mail and include their full name and e-mail address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, and you are currently a registered subscriber to IssueAlert via SCIENTECH's website, please visit <http://secure.scientech.com/account/> to unsubscribe. Otherwise, please send an e-mail to to IssueAlert <mailto:IssueAlert@scientech.com>, with "Delete IA Subscription" in the subject line.

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the independent analysis of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed, or to be the basis for investment decisions of any kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as an expert on energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights reserved.

  <http://infostore.consultrci.com/spacerdot.gif?IssueAlert=10/15/2001>


How much involvement has A & K had on Midway?  I have other counsel engaged
for the sale, but this falls into a different category.

Kay

From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/05/2001 11:35 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: Midway Interconnect Agreement

Please see attachment below with Christi's comments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:22 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Krause, Greg; Nicolay, Christi
Subject: Midway Interconnect Agreement

Kay:

Greg has Christi's comments on the FPL Construction & Connection Agreement,
and he will be sending us those comments today in a marked document. Have we
engaged outside counsel to review this agreement? I'd like to have a
commercial / legal review fully completed, and then get accounting / finance
to comment. I this something you were planning to have Carlos to work on
given his recent work on ComEd and Ameren?

Please let me know. Thanks.

Attached is the original generic form of FPL Connection and Construction
Agreement for your reference.

Ben


FYI.

MM
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2000
02:22 PM ---------------------------

Chris Abel
04/07/2000 08:30 AM
To: Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Limit Violation - Enron Australia

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Abel/HOU/ECT on 04/07/2000 08:29 AM
---------------------------

From:  Ted Murphy
04/07/2000 08:25 AM

To: Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Chris Abel@ECT,
Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allan
Ford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Whalley
Subject: Re: Limit Violation - Enron Australia

Paul,
While I think it is reasonable for you to request an increase to your limits,
as you may know, the Board doesn't meet until May 2.  It would be somewhat
unprecedented to leave a "proprietary" position over the limit for that
length of time, i.e., the Australian Electricity book would far exceed the
number of position limit violations for any other commodities.  I have left a
message for Greg and will speak to Rick Buy today.  In the meantime, I
suggest that you put together a request for approval to increase your limits
to be presented at the first opportunity.
Ted

Paul Quilkey@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/06/2000 10:16 PM
To: Greg Whalley@ECT, Ted Murphy@ECT
cc: Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Chris Abel@ECT,
Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allan
Ford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Limit Violation - Enron Australia


Guess who was at JV yesterday?  aTm coaches.  Seems like we have been losing
some players lately.  How do we stand?

DG


1.  Carol St Clair will be handling whatever is finally decided to be done
with the Raptor 2 South American swaps (assignment or termination).  Please
coordinate with her.  Carol, attached below is our general form of notice of
termination which has to be customized depending upon the type of investment
etc.  Sara had done the original South American swaps of which I do not have
copies.

2.  Depending on the timing of the Mariner transaction, Angela Davis or I
will assist.  I will be out of the office March 17 to 25.  If the swap needs
to be written in my absence, please contact Angela Davis.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Gordon McKillop@ENRON
	03/09/2001 05:32 PM

		 To: Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Brenda L Funk/Enron@EnronXGate, George McKean/NA/Enron@Enron, Hope
Vargas/Enron@EnronXGate, Joel Ephross/Enron@EnronXGate, L'Sheryl
Hudson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria LeBeau/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Baker/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Raptor Process - Mariner

It looks like that we will be proceeding with putting Mariner into Raptor.
Please start preparing the preliminary information.
Thanks,
Gordon

	Gordon McKillop
	02/28/2001 04:52 PM

		 To: L'Sheryl Hudson/HOU/ECT, Maria LeBeau/HOU/ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT,
Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT
		 cc: Joel Ephross/Enron@EnronXGate, Brenda L Funk/Enron@EnronXGate, George
McKean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron Baker/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Raptor Process - Mariner

There is a possibility that Mariner will be going into Raptor.  In
preparation for that, I am proposing that we start the Raptor process for
Mariner by preliminarily completing the Raptor proposal sheet and the Raptor
legal checklist response form.  Attached is an update from the Raptor process
that was developed by Mary Cook after Raptor I swaps were done.  Please
contact me if you have any questions or comments on the process.

Thanks,
Gordon


Hi Ben,

I got  a call from Mike, and he gave me his lawyer's telephone number.  He is
very interested in the change order, of couse.  Do I have the pay off number?

What would be a good time to talk about the ABB payment allocation with
Herman?  I really want to put that issue to be, because I don't know if we
can't put the stuff into TurboPark if we haven't taken care of it.

I'm getting GE consent to put the Coral turbines into TurboPark, if
necessary. That doesn't mean we have to, but I don't want to take any chances.

How would you feel about not having the 1000 call and just having the noon
call? That would give me time to talk to ABB, and we would be able to get the
LLC agreement back to Coral.

Thanks,

Kay


Good morning to all -- I am in the office at this time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farrell, Keegan
Sent:	Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:07 AM
To:	Heitmeyer, Kayla; Prizont, Karina; Bailey, Susan; Bruce, Robert; Cook, Mary; Farrell, Keegan; Garcia, Nita; Gonzalez, Esmeralda; Greenberg, Mark; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Jones, Tana; Keiser, Holly; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Nelson, Cheryl; Panus, Stephanie; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Spencer, Becky; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	Cheryl Nelson - Vacation Cancelled

Good Morning all!

Cheryl has cancelled her vacation days for this week, and will be in the office today.  She will arrive around 10:30 am due to a personal appointment.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.  If I can be of any assistance, please call me at 5-3317.  Thanks again,

Keegan


Dear Derivatives Week subscriber:

Catch the latest breaking news in this week's issue by clicking
here: http://www.derivativesweek.com

Top stories this week:
___________________________________________________________
Shell Trading is investigating trading credit default swaps for the first
time
as a cheaper alternative to letters of credit and to generate additional
revenue.

Korea's Asiana Airlines, with anticipated revenue of KRW2,100 billion
(USD1.9 billion), hopes this year to return to the interest-rate swaps market
to hedge some 45% of its USD1.4 billion foreign currency-denominated floating
rate loan portfolio.

Five months after launching a bankruptcy swaps market making business
Enron has only traded a handful of contracts with end users and has yet to
pull the trigger on a deal with a financial institution.

Foreign banks were seen late last month scrambling to cover short
interest-rate
option volatility positions after a sharp spike in Japanese swaption
volatility. The
banks, thought to include J.P. Morgan and Deutsche Bank, were seen buying
swaption vol on the way up and selling vol as the market traded down.
___________________________________________________________

As a DW subscriber, you are eligible for complimentary access to the
Subscribers Only area of the <www.derivativesweek.com> site, which
contains the current issue and a searchable archive of all past issues.
Use your User ID and Password to access the entire site. If you don't
have these yet, hit 'REPLY' to this email, fill out the proper information
below, and send it back to me. I'll get you set up right away!

Did you know?
Check out our new "printer-friendly version" of Derivatives Week stories
offered
at the bottom of each article on the Web site. You'll get a clean copy of the
article
to print, with no irregular page breaks or uneven margins.

===============================

Newsletter Title:
My name is:
My company is:
My city location is:

I choose my new user name to be:
I choose my new password to be:

===============================
?
If you'd prefer, call our Customer Service Department at 212-224-3800
and give them the information above.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
YOUR USER NAME AND PASSWORD ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL
USE ONLY.? THEY MAY NOT BE SHARED WITH ANYONE AND
NO ONE ELSE SHOULD ACCESS THE SITE WITH YOUR USER NAME
AND PASSWORD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please do not hesitate
to call me at 1-212-224-3034.

Thanks and enjoy this week's issue.

Jim Beecher

Publisher

NOTE: You will receive weekly updates of the hottest stories in
Derivatives Week. These are not random mass mailings but
rather one-time messages for your personal attention. If you do
not wish to continue to receive these notices, please click 'reply',
type 'remove' and enter your name and company. You will then
be removed from our email database.


Suzanne,

Below are the contracts we will need to ship on Guadalupe Pipeline in Texas.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Christopher G Syzdek" <cgsyzdek@duke-energy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 3:52 PM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Cc:	Brian Kerns
Subject:	Intrastate and 311 contracts for Guadalupe pipeline.

Daren,

Per the request of our marketer Brian Kerns,  attached is the contract
forms for both Intrastate and 311 on our Guadalupe pipeline.

(See attached file: Form Guadalupe Insrastate Transportation Contract.doc)
(See attached file: Exhibit A-Intra New 8-31-01.doc)(See attached file:
Exhibit B-Intra New 8-31-01.doc)

(See attached file: Form Guadalupe 311 Transportation Agreement.doc)(See
attached file: Exhibit A-311 New 8-31-01.doc)(See attached file: Exhibit
B-311 New 8-31-01.doc)

Please call me if you have any questions.

Chris Syzdek
Senior Contract Analyst
713-627-6485
 - Form Guadalupe Insrastate Transportation Contract.doc
 - Exhibit A-Intra New 8-31-01.doc
 - Exhibit B-Intra New 8-31-01.doc
 - Form Guadalupe 311 Transportation Agreement.doc
 - Exhibit A-311 New 8-31-01.doc
 - Exhibit B-311 New 8-31-01.doc


I think we are making great progress on the systems side.  I would like to
set a deadline of November 10th to have a plan on all North American projects
(I'm ok if fundementals groups are excluded) that is signed off on by
commercial, Sally's world, and Beth's world.  When I say signed off I mean
that I want signitures on a piece of paper that everyone is onside with the
plan for each project.  If you don't agree don't sign. If certain projects
(ie. the gas plan) are not done yet then lay out a timeframe that the plan
will be complete.  I want much more in the way of specifics about objectives
and timeframe.

Thanks for everyone's hard work on this.

John