Kate:

Can you do the comparison we discussed?

C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
10:41 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Onukogu, Ernest" <Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>
   01/11/2001 09:33 AM

To: "'chris.h.foster@enron.com'" <chris.h.foster@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: DJ NP 15/SP 15 Electricity Price Index

> -----Original Message-----
> From: djenergy
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 4:44 PM
> Cc: Onukogu, Ernest
> Subject: DJ NP 15/SP 15 Electricity Price Index
>
>  <<NP 15 pages.xls>>  <<SP 15 pages.xls>>

 - NP 15 pages.xls
 - SP 15 pages.xls


Team

Listed below is a brief description on the status for the Project.

? EIP Associates is currently working on the CEQA Initial Draft Study.  The
draft will be complete on February 11th, 2000.  At this point it will be in
our hands for review and comment.  I have scheduled for our review period to
take no longer than one week.  So please be prepared, the Study will be
coming to you on February 14th.  I want to get this Study out to public
review ASAP!
? EES will be sending out an Request for Proposal (RFP) to three contractors
this week to obtain costs to compare to the PG&E numbers received in their
Detailed Study.  The RFP will contain various sketches and documents
detailing the following scopes of work.  The overbuilding of the existing
12kV line to accommodate a 115kV circuit from the PG&E Herndon - Bullard Sub.
to the new CSUF Sub.  The installation of an underground 115kV circuit from
the PG&E Herndon - Bullard Sub. to the new CSUF Sub.  The yard work at the
PG&E Herndon - Bullard Sub.
? Developing a strategy for the upcoming meeting with PG&E to go over the
Detailed Study.  I am shooting for this meeting to take place during the last
week of February.  I will be working with all of you in the mean time to make
sure all bases are covered and that a correct, thorough agenda is developed.

I hope this gives everyone an idea of where we stand.  Feel free to call or
respond back with any questions or comments.

Rob Cone

Project Manager
Enron Energy Services
12647 Alcosta Blvd., Suite 500
San Ramon, CA 94583
Ph:925.543.3701, Fax:925.543.3550
Pager:888.397.5826


For those of you trying to keep track of the exhibit lists in this case, I
have included an exhibit list for those documents already filed and proposed
numbers for the pending rebuttal testimony on the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement.? Please identify your testimony as such for consistency purposes.

FILED EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1?? Comprehensive Settlement Document??
Exhibit 2?? Lad Lorenz Testimony
Exhibit 3?? Eric Nelson Testimony
Exhibit 4?? Mark Pocta Testimony
Exhibit 5?? Tom Beach Testimony
Exhibit 6?? Jeff Dasovich Testimony
Exhibit 7?? Rick Counihan Testimony
Exhibit 8?? John Burkholder Testimony
Exhibit 9?? Paul Amirault Testimony
Exhibit 10? Jeanne Zaiontz Testimony
Exhibit 11? Paul McKelvey Testimony
Exhibit 12? Jeff Fawcett Testimony
Exhibit 13? Errata to Comprehensive Settlement Document

NEW EXHIBITS
Exhibit 14? Rebuttal Testimony of Lad Lorenz
Exhibit 15? Rebuttal Testimony of Jeff Dasovich
Exhibit 16? Rebuttal Testimony of Paul Amirault
Exhibit 17? Rebuttal Testimony of Jeff Fawcett
Exhibit 18? Rebuttal Testimony of Tom Beach
Exhibit 19? Rebuttal Testimony of John Burkholder? (?)
Exhibit 20? Rebuttal Testimony of Rick Counihan (?)


Myself and all of my desk heads will be interviewing candidates Wednesday from 1:00 to 5:00 pm.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jennifer Brockwell/NA/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jennifer+20Brockwell_NA_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of experience Enron,
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	Power Trading Visit, Wednesday, May 30

Kevin,
Would you be available for this visit?  He will be meeting with Jeff Skilling from 2:30 - 3:00 pm and then will be taking the Enron Overview Tour.

Please let me know.

Thanks
Jennifer

Date:		May 30, 2001
Time:		3:30 pm

Visitor:	Lord Mayor, Sir David Howard (Mayor of London)
		Sheriff Nigel Branson
		Neill O'Connor-Private Secretary
		Peter Lisley-Press Officer
		Ian Murray-Consul General

Purpose:	The purpose of this visit is to build a strong relationship with the City of London, due to Enron's operations there.  The mayor is visiting Houston to promote the City of London as the world's leading international financial centre.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/09/2000 10:55 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	11/09/2000 10:24 AM

		 To: steve@amerexenergy.com
		 cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: NDA's

At the request of Bob Shults, I am enclosing our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement for each of Amerex Natural Gas I, Ltd. and Amerex
Power, Ltd.  Please call me at (713) 853-3399 or Bob at (713) 853-0397  if
you have any comments or questions.


Many thanks,

Olivia

-----Original Message-----
From: Per.Sekse@enron.com [mailto:Per.Sekse@enron.com]
Sent: 18 September 2000 23:02
To: ob@GlobalAdvisors.co.uk
Cc: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com; Paul.Radous@enron.com
Subject: Exact legal entity for ISDA

The entity should be Enron North America Corp., but I've copied Sara
Shackleton who is our in-house attorney in case I'm wrong.

Sara please let me know if anything has changed regarding the trading name
we use. Thanks.

With best regards,
Per

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  "Olivia Bernard"
 pic12052.pcx) <ob@GlobalAdvisors.co.uk>
               09/18/2000 09:05 AM

Please respond to <ob@GlobalAdvisors.co.uk>

To:   "Per Sekse" <per.sekse@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Exact legal entity

Dear Per,

Is Enron North America the exact legal entity we should set the ISDA with ?

Cheers
Olivia Bernard
Business Manager
Global Advisors Limited
One Curzon Street
6th floor - London W1Y 7FN
+44 207 629 1117
fx : +44 207 629 0356
ob@GlobalAdvisors.co.uk


,
Further to my voice mail to you, Mark,   an outfit called Energy Crossroads
has a website through which, among other things, they auction power
transmission in California, including some that our traders want to consider
bidding on for a deal with the City of Anaheim.  If we were to bid and get
the transmission, we would enter into a WSPP open access tariff transmission
agreement directly between EPMI and Anaheim.   To bid through this online
system we must click on a button that says we agree to:

1. indemnify them from claims arising out of our use of the site,  any
transactions we conduct through or not through the site with members of the
site, and our violation of the agreement or any infringement.

2. agree to accept personal jurisdiction and venue in the state and federal
courts of Orange County, California.

This is the first time I have had to deal with what I call a legal cram down
by an online company.  I would not initial a contract containing the above
terms for off line business and I am assuming we shouldn't do it for online
business either but would like to get the benefit of your perspectives
before I call Mark Haedicke to discuss  a waiver of our no venue policy .   I
am faced with the vexatious de minimis dilemna:  there is a 90% chance our
traders will just look at the auction and not bid and so the argument is:
why can't we just look at something on the website without getting into all
this legal complexity?  Do we have a third party web site access legal
policy?   Any help you could give would be appreciated.----cgy


-----Original Message-----
From: Denton, Rhonda L.
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:05 PM
To: Indelicato, Kimberly; White, Stacey W.
Subject: FW: Enron Song


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff King/Corp/Enron on 05/16/2001 09:30
AM ---------------------------

Craig Carmichael <cgcarmic@uswest.net> on 05/15/2001 04:38:41 PM
To: robert.benson@enron.com, jeff.king@enron.com, kyle.schultz@enron.com,
doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com, matt.lorenz@enron.com,
paul.j.broderick@enron.com, tom.may@enron.com, mike.carson@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Load Forecasting Technology

To whom it may concern:

My name is Craig Carmichael.  I am a PhD student at Iowa State
University, working under Dr. Bartlett in the Adaptive Computing Lab.
Please lend me your attention for a brief moment.  Enron's team of power
traders is the first contact I have made in this nature.

I strongly believe that I have developed technology that can make Enron
millions in the very near-term future.  If you are a power trader whose
success is proportional to the accuracy of your load forecasts, then I
believe I can deliver an enormous opportunity to Enron and you.  If I am
way off base on my assessment, please let me know and I will go
somewhere else.  I CHALLENGE EACH OF YOU TO DISCREDIT MY BELIEFS.

Here are some of my credentials, so that you can verify that it might be
promising to read the remainder of this email.

   1.  Finishing up ISU PhD work this summer.
   2.  Invented multiple neural network methods and inductive learning
techniques.
   2.  Recently DEVELOPED THE MOST ACCURATE electric load models in the
Chicago area for ComEd.
   3.  Saved ComEd millions of $ over the last couple years because of
this.
   4.  Can verify the above claims and that I did this single-handedly.
   5.  Wrote the new inductive learning algorithm for New Energy
Associates in Atlanta.
   6.  My software will be the new learning engine of NEA's NOSTRADAMUS
future v5.0
   7.  Can verify that I single-handedly wrote NOSTRADAMUS's new training
engine (not yet released)
   8.  Am the world's best electric load forecaster using advanced
inductive learning methods.

This is the situation:

   I am giving my Final Defense on July 16th in areas of advanced
forecasting methods.  In 1999, I developed highly advanced neural
network models for Commonwealth Edison, under Robert Abboud (working at
ComEd) through the Adaptive Computing Lab at Iowa State University.  The
models were the most accurate available.  At the time, ComEd was using
the EPRI models, NEA's Nostradamus, Tesla, and the ISU models (those
that I developed).  Still, I knew of many ways for improvement and have
been waiting for my graduation to release this technology.  Preliminary
studies show that my most recent work is more accurate than anything
that is available at any price.

   Since I have felt oppressed by the system (being a student), I have
awaited graduation (am finished mid-July) to unleash the technology that
I have developed outside of the university (my funding comes from the
Meteorology department and has nothing to do with load forecasting).
This is unpublished, provocative, state-of-the-art stuff that can smoke
even the multi-million dollar EPRI models, and only I know how they
work.  The technology could also put Tesla out of business.  The errors
appear to be LESS THAN HALF OF THOSE OF NOSTRADAMUS.

John Snead from Tesla knows me and feared my models so much that he
tried to merge his company with RGA Labs.  Robert Abboud from ComEd,
Excelon (and now RGA Labs) knows who I am.  Rick Hunt, the project
manager from New Energy Associates does also, since I wrote the software
for their yet-to-be-released inductive learning engine.

Ok.  Here are the possibilities.

   1.  I am making all of this up and did't really invent leading
forecasting technology
   2.  I am a nut who doesn't even know what he's talking about
   3.  This guy couldn't possibly do this sort of thing on his own clock
all by himself
   4.  Maybe there's something to what this guy is saying.  We might as
well send him a data set to test his claims.

I feel that someone will continue to try to take advantage of me if I
don't act now.  Within the next 6 months, someone will probably own my
technology besides myself.  I want to prove that I can be an immense
asset to Enron.  I would like to sell my technology to Enron as part of
your in-house modeling efforts.

Someone else might come along and try to make the same claims that I am
making.  They might razzle-dazzle you with their marketing sense and
ability to sell you their gem.

What I am saying is that if you give me a chance to show you what I can
do, if you care about accuracy and not razzle-dazzle, then I will not
disappoint you.  Give a data set to me and a thousand other people and
companies.  Let me show you that I'm not making all of this up.  I will
show you flaws in other "gems".

I hope this email wasn't too long.  My family & I, as of now, have a
fairly uncertain financial future (until I enter the workforce and have
a fairly cushy job).  Because of this, I am obligated to see what
opportunities exist with my intellectual property.  If I fail in
convincing Enron that I have a gold mine in my possession, then I will
go to the #2 spot on my list, and will offer to provide them with the
leading forecasting package available today.  In some way, shape or
form, in this scenario my software will then compete with Enron.

Thank you for lending me your ear.  I hope you don't think I'm a lunatic
for sending you this lengthy email.

Craig Carmichael
cgcarmic@uswest.net


Yes thank you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaniss, Jason
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:07 AM
To:	Thomas, Paul D.
Subject:	Nepool and NYPP Outages

Is this what you are looking for?

Jason
 << File: Book2.xls >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2000 01:45
PM ---------------------------

Brian Hendon@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
02/02/2000 01:07 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Rudy/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:
Subject: Funny

This is a real news report

>>Yahoo! News
>>Aggies are  getting themselves into trouble again....
>>
>>  AP. A Texas A&M University student who claimed he had
>>been raped by a
>>dog
>>  was yesterday jailed for 12 months. Martin Hoyle, 20,
>>was arrested by
>>police
>>  after the
>>  passengers of a passing car witnessed a Bull Terrier,
>>called Badger,
>>having
>>  sex with Hoyle on the side of Highway 290, just north
>>of Hempstead.
>>  Assistent District attorney Ben Crossland said the
>>passengers of the
>>car, an
>>  unidentified couple from Houston, had stopped to help
>>because they
>>thought
>>  Hoyle was being attacked by the animal.  But when
>>they got closer they
>>saw
>>  that Hoyle had his pants around his ankles, was down
>>on all fours, and
>>the
>>  dog was straddling him from behind.
>>
>>  "The defendant mumbled something about the dog having
>>taken a liking
>>to
>>  him," said Mr Crossland.  "The couple were extremely
>>offended and
>>sickened
>>  by what they saw." Another individual in a passing
>>car contacted
>>police on a
>>  cellular phone and Hoyle was arrested as he walked
>>with the dog on the
>>  feeder road. Hoyle, of College Station, told police
>>"I can't help it
>>if the
>>  dog took a liking to me.  He tried to rape me." He
>>repeated the rape
>>  allegation at the police station and added, "The dog
>>pulled my jeans
>>down."
>>
>>  Hoyle, who has been arrested several times on
>>alcohol-related charges,
>>was
>>  jailed for 12 months after he admitted committing an
>>act that outraged
>>  public decency. His lawyer said Hoyle had no memory
>>of the incident
>>because
>>  of his intoxicated state, but was now very remorseful
>>and incredibly
>>  embarrassed. Jailing him, Judge Alistair McCallum
>>told Hoyle "Never
>>before
>>  in my time at the bar or on the bench have I ever had
>>to deal with
>>somebody
>>  who voluntarily allowed himself to be molested by a
>>dog on the public
>>  highway. Frankly it is beyond most of our
>>comprehension. It is an
>>absolutely
>>  disgusting thing for members of the public to have to
>>witness."
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
>>http://im.yahoo.com
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.


MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Joe Hartsoe, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy

DATE: April 6, 2001

RE: FERC Orders Issued April 6th (1) CalPX Chargebacks;
(2)CalPX  Rate Recalculations; and (3) Kern River
Certificate

We want to inform you of three significant orders FERC issued today, two
relating to the California Power Exchange (CalPX), and the third concerning a
pipeline project from Wyoming to California.

(1) Pacific Gas & Electric Company v. California Power Exchange Corporation,
et al. (Docket Nos. EL01-29/33/36/37/43-000) "Order on Complaints Concerning
Use of Chargebacks and Liquidation of Collateral"
In this order, the Commission addressed five complaints against the CalPx
concerning its response to alleged defaults by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
and Southern California Edison Company (SoCal Edison).  Among other things,
the Commission determined that "the chargeback provision in the PX tariff was
not designed to address default of this magnitude and, thus, its application
in these circumstances is unjust and unreasonable."  Accordingly, the
Commission directed the CalPX to rescind all prior chargeback actions and
refrain from any future chargeback actions relating to PG&E and SoCal
Edison's liabilities, subject to further Commission action in accordance with
the order.
Regarding the ultimate question of how the PX should account for the
nonpayments by SoCal Edison and PG&E, the Commission deferred further action
pending the outcome of SoCal Edison's State Court Complaint, as well as the
Government Claims Board Complaint.  Finally, with respect to the PX's
bankruptcy proceeding, the Commission concluded that section 362(b)(4) of the
Bankruptcy Code allowed it to lawfully exercise its regulatory power under
sections 205 and 206 of the Federal Power Act, so long as it did not threaten
the bankruptcy court's control over the property of the bankruptcy estate.

(2) San Diego Gas & Electric Company v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary
Services (Docket Nos. EL00-95-015/016 and Docket Nos. EL00-98-014/015) "Order
Dismissing Rehearing, Accepting Compliance Filing, and Directing the
Recalculation of Lower Wholesale Rates"
In this order, the Commission dismissed the CalPX's request for rehearing of
the Commission's January 29, 2001 order, which found that the CalPX had
violated the Commission's December 15, 2000 order and the Federal Power Act.
The December 15 order required the CalPX to pay suppliers in the CalPX
markets their as-bid price above the $150/MWh breakpoint.  Additionally, the
Commission accepted the PX's compliance filing and provided guidance to the
PX on an acceptable methodology so that the PX may implement the $150/MWh
breakpoint for its January 1, 2001 invoices.  Additionally, as in the
chargeback case, the Commission determined that its action in the instant
case was exempt from the automatic stay provision of the Bankruptcy Code.

(3) Kern River Gas Transmission Company (Docket No. CP01-106-000) "Order
Issuing Certificate"
Pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, the Commission denied the
protests that had been filed and issued a certificate of public convenience
and necessity to Kern River authorizing it to construct and operate its
California Action Project, subject to resolution of the proceeding pending in
Docket No. CP01-61-000.  However, the Commission rejected Kern River's
proposal to utilize a return on equity for this project of 15.25 percent.
Instead, the Commission directed Kern River to file a revised incremental
rate to reflect a return on equity of 13.25 percent at least 30 days prior to
commencing service.  Finally, the Commission conditioned the certificate on
Kern River's compliance with the environmental conditions set forth in
Appendix C to the order.

These orders can be found on the Bulk Power section of FERC's website, at
www.ferc.fed.us/electric/bulkpower.htm.  If you have any questions, comments
or would like additional information relating to these orders, please contact
either Julie Simon (jsimon@epsa.org) or Mark Bennett (mbennett@epsa.org) at
(202) 628-8200.


This request has been pending approval for  12 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000078934&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000078934
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 12/11/01 10:26:11 AM
Requested For       : don.baughman@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


On Wall Street, people are talking about Enron.  At Enron, we're talking
about people...our people.  You are the driving force behind every success
that our company has experienced, including our high-performing stock price,
which surpassed the $50 mark only a few days ago. You made it happen!

To show our appreciation for your hard work and commitment to Enron,s
continued success, eligible regular full-time and regular part-time employees
who were on the payroll of a wholly-owned Enron company at Dec. 31, 1999 will
receive 50 Enron stock options.  A special stock option award certificate and
a copy of the stock plan will be sent to you in the next few weeks.

About the stock options grant:
? The grant was effective Jan. 18, 2000, therefore, the option grant price is
$55.50.
? Options will have a seven-year term, which means you must exercise these
options before seven years have passed.
? Options will vest 25 percent on Feb. 28, 2000 and 25 percent each
subsequent January 18th thereafter until fully vested, as long as you are an
employee of Enron.  This means you may exercise 25 percent of these options
as early as Feb. 28.
? This grant is made in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Enron
Corp. Stock Plans and the award documents, which you will receive in the
coming weeks.

Due to varying international restrictions and legalities, Enron employees in
certain international locations will receive some other form of recognition.
Your local management and human resources representative will communicate
further details.

Visit home.enron.com for additional information.  There you can access a list
of frequently asked questions regarding stock options.  And you can view a
special message from Ken Lay.  To access the special message, you must have
IP-TV and a sound card. If you are not able to view Ken,s message, a
transcript is available.  If you encounter any technical difficulties, please
contact your PC Help Desk.

Again, thank you for all you do to make Enron a successful global energy and
broadband services company and a great place to work.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/11/2001 07:56 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	01/11/2001 05:19 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Marcie
Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Extraordinary Session - Update

MEMORANDUM RE FIRST EXTRAORDINARY COMMITTEE SESSION

From:  Sandi McCubbin
            Mike Day

January 11, 2001

Note: This memo will supplement the committee analysis which you will
receive by separate fax.

ABX1-5 Keeley re the governance of the ISO and PX was discussed first.
A number of possible amendments were discussed by members.  Suggested
amendments included extending the term of members beyond one year,
increasing the number of members beyond 3, whether there should be
senate confirmation of ISO and PX board members, or at least voting
representation for the legislature on the Energy Oversight Board which
will approve the ISO/PX members.  There was also discussion of whether
FERC would approve of this new governance structure.   Another
discussion centered on whether the positions should be full time, as
opposed to part time, and how to define &affiliated8 in conjunction with
the bill,s ban on members of the ISO and PX being affiliated with a
market participant.

Support for the bill:  Consumers Union, EOB on behalf of the
administration, CalPIRG, PX, TURN, UCAN, ORA, Coalition of Utility
Employees.

Opposition:  ISO, which raised issues regarding incompatibility with
FERC orders and concern that the bill would lead to lengthy litigation.
They suggested that if the ISO and PX boards were appointed solely by
the California governor that FERC would not find that legally sufficient
to be &independent8.

ABX1-6 Dutra/Pescetti  addressed retained utility generation assets and
commission regulation of same.  The bill as written is merely a clean up
to clarify that the CPUC would retain jurisdiction over utility
generation after it is valued for purposes of calculating CTC*until and
unless the CPUC gives permission for the plant to be sold under Section
851.    The discussion evolved into a lengthy inquiry over the different
regulatory schemes for utility and non-utility generation.  Assemblyman
Leonard questioned whether it was efficient to have a market where a
portion of the generation was regulated and another portion
unregulated.  More and more members skirted the subject of attempting to
regulate the non-utility generators within the state.  In supporting
testimony, CPUC President Lynch essentially asked for jurisdiction over
such generators, stating that CPUC inspectors were denied access to an
AES plant at Redondo Beach for 9 hours during an ISO alert yesterday.
Chmn. Wright asked Lynch to assemble a list of the regulatory powers she
would seek.

In support:  CPUC, TURN, UCAN, CUE, PG&E, SCE

PG&E agreed with Lynch and also argued that the Legislature should
revisit the exemption regulation for marketers and non-utility
generators contained in Code section 216(I).   PG& also had suggested
technical amendments, which were not released, which dealt with
confirming that Section 367 still requires market valuation and that the
CPUC can set the ratemaking for such retained assets.

We have talked with the author about meeting with him after the
amendments are available.  No amendments were voted on for any of these
bills until they are brought up in the Senate.  Thus there was only
limited discussion of amendments.


Dale ,
You need to make to where we can change the trailblazer nom on the north end plan.  We had a Minnegasco storage deal and needed to make a change to trailblazer and we couldn't do it due to it automatically downloading.  Some points automaticly downloading is fine, but I would appreciate it if you would fix this for us.

                                    Thank you,

                                     Margaret

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ratliff, Dale
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:49 PM
To:	DL-ETS Gas Controllers
Subject:	Gas Control Changes

The Gas Control Morning Meeting Report has been change to improve the presentation of the information in the morning meeting.  To facilitate this a number of changes were necessary on the North and Central Plans.  The most notable change was the addition of a column showing the spot rate.  There are other minor changes involving how the load is calculated in the average and spot column.  There have been no changes made to the future days on the plan.  Also, there have been minor changes made to the Permian and Anadarko plans but the basic functionality is still the same.  If you have any problems or have any question call me at 31534

Thanks
Dale


1. yes
2. no
3. no

let me know if you need anything else


Deals 141877,141883, and 141884 (Koch Midstream) were in CES's system (and
ours) as term sales. However,  those deals were terminated by CES. So, any
volumes at KMID are sold to Midcon Texas P/L Operator at IF-.09. The purchase
price is (.10) for base volumes and (.11) for swing volumes. For Feb, I
zeroed the volumes in deals 141877,141833,141884, in Sitara. All of the
volumes will be in deal 156256. O'Neal, do we need to risk assign this new
deal? Julie, it is an evergreen deal.  MTPL takes whatever is produced at the
points. Let me know if I can help with anything else.

Thanks,
AC


713 803 0952


In addition to the proposal made by Manny, we'd like to propose the the
attached
as a further modification to the unit specific dispatch for consideration by
the
RUG on Dec 6 or 7.  This language proposes to base premiums on the Resource
plan
rather than current output.  This is consistent with what ERCOT has proposed
with OOME and is more appropriate than basing the premiums on unit limits.

Larry

(See attached file: Local Congestion changes to Sections 4 and 6.doc)

 - Local Congestion changes to Sections 4 and 6.doc


<<92860_1.DOC>>
Chris,
Please call me once you have looked at these questions and let me know
what additional questions we should ask Dominion.  Thanks.
Shemin
 - 92860_1.DOC


We have received the executed  Amendment to the Subscription Agreement with
WeatherTrade, Inc. dated March 2, 2000.  This Amendment amends the
Transaction Fee referenced in subparagraph (c) of the Fee Schedule to the
Subscription Agreement.  Copies will be distributed.


I have added four new documents to Deal Bench in connection with the Midway
site (can be found in the New Documents area).

Greg has provided me with a two more that will need to be scanned and moved
to deal bench.  I'll let you know when they are available.

Kathleen Carnahan
Enron North  America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3146d
Houston, TX 77002
Phone - (713) 345-3386
Fax - (713) 646-3037


Anyone out there know why FERC has asked the PX for still more data?


FYI - On the Enron home page under New and Notable there is a category listed as Employee Services.  It contains some important Benefits telephone numbers along with other general numbers.  Just an FYI for those of you who don't look at the home page on a regular basis.
slb


Zhiyang,

Got your message.

As we discussed, the best way to breakdown the big correlation matrix between
different location indices is through "cluster analysis".  The idea is to
select major
hubs and the "satellite" markets.  By establish the correlation between the
hubs
and correlation between the satellites and the hubs, the big matrix can be
significantly
reduced.    Then the traders only need to input the correlations between the
hubs.

This technique has been applied in our Value at Risk system.  You may talk to
Tanya to find out the details.

Zimin

PS: the wsprd code you requested.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
01:07 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
11/20/2000 11:20 AM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL WTI maket maker simulation model

John,

Here is the spreadsheet Zimin built for estimaing P/L from trading WTI
forwards.     Let Zimin, Vince, or I know if you have questions or comments.

--Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
11:14 AM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
11/17/2000 04:37 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL WTI maket maker simulation model

Stinson,

I add the total P/L due to contract rollover.  When the number of trades is
large
and the spread is not too small, the model prints a lot of money, dominated by
those trade earning the half of BO spread.

I also wrote an explaination about the model on the front page. I think we
are
ready to deliever the model V.1.

Zimin


Done.

Katherine Herrera@ENRON
09/05/2000 10:14 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

Daren,

I believe the best way to enter the fee into Sitara would be as a Demand fee
in your example #1.
If we do the fee this way, we will not  double up the volumes.

I have attached my spreadsheet for support:
THE MOST CURRENT WORKSHEET IS TAB #2 MARKED FINAL

Column G is the Over-Delivery quantity total is 17,278 mmbtus
Column S is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due HPLC
$1,008.87
Column T is the Daily dollar amount for the over-delivery quantity due the
customer $519.73.

Thanks-
Katherine
5-8643

Daren J Farmer@ECT
08/31/2000 05:49 PM
To: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

Katherine,

There are 2 ways that I can enter this fee into Sitara:
1) I can put the dollar amount in on day 1 as a demand or facility fee.

2) I need you to give me volume(s) and a price to input into the deal.  I
can't just input a dollar amount in Sitara.

Let me know how you want to handle it.

D

Katherine Herrera@ENRON
08/31/2000 05:28 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Duke Exchange Deal Feb. 2000 Prod.

CASHOUT
Please add the following fees for Feb. 2000:

FEE TYPE:
Natural Gas
Physical Forward
Penalty for Over/ Under take

Sales Ticket # 157278
$1,008.87 Dollars Due HPLC

Purchase Ticket # 157288
$519.73 Dollars Due Duke

Thanks- Katherine


It's really easy to assume that companies are closing positions and that's why there are so many trades.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Denne, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:10 PM
To:	Lay, Kenneth; Frevert, Mark; Whalley, Greg; McMahon, Jeffrey; Koenig, Mark; Derrick Jr., James; Rogers, Rex; Causey, Richard; Glisan, Ben; Despain, Tim; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; 'josh-pekarsky@kekst.com'; 'lar@kekst.com'
Cc:	Fleming, Rosalee; Daw, Nicki; Taylor, Liz; Ford, Sue; Westbrook, Sharron; Kean, Steven J.; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Denne, Karen; Meyer, Vance; Philipp, Meredith
Subject:	Draft Press Release
Importance:	High
Sensitivity:	Confidential

Attached is a new draft press release.  First thing in the morning, we need to discuss whether to release this.  Please contact Steve Kean, Mark Palmer or me with your comments.

Thank you.
Karen
x39757


Did you ever receive this signed confirm letter?

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/26/2001 01:31 PM
---------------------------
Stephanie Piwetz   02/26/2001 01:32 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: PUD Grant County Confirms

Kate, can you please ask Holli if she has a copy of the following
confirmation(s) Deal 420554.01, 420563.01 (probably confirmed together).
Sharen Cason worked on the confirmation letter, but we never received a copy
for our records.  Can you please send us a copy of the Confirmation Letter so
we can properly scan the document in our system.  Thank you for your help.
Stephanie
713-646-2443 fax


Hi John:
Nice hearing from you.
Randy Aucoin's number is 713-837-2274
Thanks and let me know how things a evolving from your side.
Paulo Issler

-----Original Message-----
From: Griffith, John [mailto:John.Griffith@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Paulo Issler
Subject:

Paulo,

Could you send me Randy O'quinn's phone number.  I have misplaced it.
Thanks.

John Griffith

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


On May 27th a lufkin Industrial market will go down by 5,000.  We are going to move this sale to Lyondell meter #   5045    .  The sales price will remain at Index minus $.12.   The sale will remain at Lyondell for approximately 2 weeks.     Since the screen has fallen about $1 this should be a good thing for us and a very nice thing for Entex to do for us.

Thanks,

Janet


I located a confidentiality agreement dated Dec. 16, 1998 with Terry B.
Wilcock re: proposed intro of ECT to certain Indian tribes, the doc signed by
Tom Gros.  Please call me in the morning and we can discuss.  SS


FYI...ONLY !

 Gary agreed to let the deficiency volumes hit the buyback that is set
presently.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000
02:25 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           03/13/2000 02:09 PM

To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Neuweiler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Valero Gas Marketing ; Meter #: 8018 / Sitara Ticket # 148376

  Effective March 11th  Valero has not pulled any gas on a 35.0/day
nomination.

  Do you want to arrange a buyback for this activity. There is a buyback
ticket { # 148381} available
  to handle any underage.

  I am being told this interconnect will be down 2-weeks; effective March
11th.


Please call me.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 06/13/2001
04:49 PM ---------------------------
From: Jody Underwood on 06/13/2001 04:44 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MEMO


You're invited to search and register:

Tuesday, March 6

Investinme.enron.com is a new tool to help you manage your professional
development.
It brings together the listings of internal programs, as well as access to a
database of
external programs, on-line courses and materials

Double Click  and select launch.

Web site demonstrations
EB 568 on March 5, from 1-5 PM (every hour), and March 6, from 9-5 (every
hour)

Questions?  Please call the EWS Development Center  X 3-0357.


I think its ok because its not a unilateral termination right--its a termination right triggered by a changed circumstance that upsets the basic bargain of the parties.  If I'm wrong let me know.  Per Steve Harris, it may be pretty tough to get anyone to agree to such a term in the first place, so it might not matter.  DF

From:	Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/27/2001 09:31 AM
To:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate, Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate, Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: Red Rock form contract

I thought a pipeline having unilateral termination rights was a problem under Natural.  Maria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fossum, Drew
Sent:	Tuesday, March 27, 2001 8:29 AM
To:	Miller, Mary Kay
Cc:	Pavlou, Maria; Scott, Susan; Harris, Steven; Hyatt, Kevin; McCoppin, Dorothy; Corman, Shelley
Subject:	RE: Red Rock form contract

I like the new language, but have added a couple of changes in the redlined version attached hereto (I think mine are in blue).  One of the changes is for clarity and one is to make the contract terminable at our option instead of automatically terminated if the neg. rate is invalidated and our max rate is lower than the Rate  [we may want to preserve the contract in that scenario if the market value is even lower than the max. rate!!]   On MKM's point, I think the only contract we have sent out is to CalPine, right???  I think we explain it to them as a mechanism that is designed to preserve our benefit of the bargain if FERC changes the rules in the middle of the game.  If they choke on it, we probably have to take the risk with them since they are are our baseload tenant.  As to other shippers that we haven't sent the contract to, we ought to push very hard to get language like this.  I'm sending to Shelley and Dot to get their insight.  Dot--have you guys done anything analogous in your precedent agreements on the many Florida projects?  Not necessarily on neg. rates,  but FERC-outs in general?    DF

 << File: FERC out amendmentrl.doc >>

 	  From:  Mary Kay Miller                           03/26/2001 05:13 PM

To:	Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate

Subject:	RE: Red Rock form contract   << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

These changes look good to me, but how are we going to communicate this without raising a big flag that we are concerned with negotiated rate deals?   MK

From:	Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 04:13 PM
To:	Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	RE: Red Rock form contract

Here are my suggestions. Thanks, Maria

 << File: FERC out amendment.doc >>
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan
Sent:	Monday, March 26, 2001 3:42 PM
To:	Fossum, Drew; Harris, Steven; Hyatt, Kevin; Pavlou, Maria; Miller, Mary Kay
Subject:	Red Rock form contract

At Drew's request I've drafted the attached language to address the possibility that FERC might change its negotiated rate policy statement or otherwise invalidate the negotiated rate in the contract.  Stan brought this idea up at this morning's staff meeting (for those of you who, like me, weren't in attendance).  Please comment.
 << File: FERC out amendment.doc >>

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Hi Pete,

Can you send me the most recent version of the LV Co Gen facility agreement?
Also, in a separate email could you send me the C of A?  I want to make sure
I have the latest, greatest of each.

Thanks,

Kay


Let me know your availability to discuss.

 Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James E Keller/HOU/EES on 05/21/2001
09:08 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Andrew Wu                           05/20/2001 01:30 PM
	Phone No: 713 853-0504

To: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Eric
Letke/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Don
Black/HOU/EES@EES, Denise Furey/Enron@EnronXGate, Beth Apke/HOU/EES@EES, Mike
D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C
Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, kbird@quinnemanuel.com, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PacTel Revised Commodity Agmt

Attached to this email pls find the latest version of the subject agreement,
incorporating the thoughts and comments received to date (including PacTel's
comments).  Note that there are number of outstanding issues.  We will be
working off this version commencing Monday p.m. (21 May) in SBC's offices in
San Ramon.  I have also included a redline against the version that we sent
to PacTel.

Pls email comments questions etc. and I'll be able to pick them up from the
(Enron) San Ramon office.  If you need to get a hold of me in person, the
best way is to send me an email page to 8773417930@skytel.com.

AW


Hello Jeff-- I had been meaning to contact you recently but events somewhat curbed that idea. Wanted to know a couple things, first if we can continue to sent you The Desk, and second if you'd be intersted in participating on our editorial board. Not a lot of responsibility really, but, more of an on-call advisor on market or ops issues -- other members often submit commentaries for The Desk or The Risk Desk, Bandwidth Desk etc, on market issues and so on. Also, if you're on the board, we'll send you the publications for free -- anyhow, let me know. Interested to learn what your plans are--understand the pressure you publicly described from running the big E, but, all of us here and others in the market firmly believe this game would suffer a huge loss were that "Skilling fellow" to call energy markets "quits" for good. If there is anything we can do, let me know. Also attached the special edition we ran last week, in the wake of the NYC tragedy.
Best,
John Sodergreen
John Sodergreen
Editor-in-Chief
Scudder Publishing Group, LLC
ph: 410/923-0688
fax: 410/923-0667
johns@scudderpublishing.com
The Desk, The Risk Desk, Power Executive
The Bandwidth Desk, Energy eBusiness


You're welcome for my attention to this matter.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Guzman                           04/25/2001 08:47 PM

To: Portland West Desk
cc:

Subject: Voice Mail Outage 4/25-4/26

At approximately 6:30 pm on 4/25 Ruth Ashe with PGE notified Enron that there
will be a voice mail outage starting the evening of 4/25 and running thru 2pm
on 4/26.  If you have any questions or concerns please contact her at
503-464-8663 or 503-323-1254.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.


Please respond back with a date.  Thanks,  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 12:27 PM -----

	Tim Belden
	11/17/2000 11:47 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Legal Support for Portland

I have discussed relocating Shari to Portland with both of you.  Elizabeth
wanted to make sure that she had hired at least one additional attorney
before Shari could move to Portland.  When I spoke to Mark earlier this week
he indicated that January 1st  was a reasonable deadline.  I would like to
get some closure/finality on this matter -- both from a business perspective
and to allow Shari to know what the future holds.  Let me know your thoughts.


Mr. Zaman called Larry yesterday to discuss the most recent offer.

Larry had the opportunity to discuss with Mr. Zaman the sense of urgency on
TW's part and the desire to meet with the decision making body - the NNERTF.
Apparently Mr. Zaman was of the impression that TW would not be pressed to
take legal action until the ROW expired.

Mr. Zaman was encouraged by the TW approach of an incentive but offered no
insights on the acceptability of the offer.  He did promised to review it
with the task force in the near future and indicated that Johnny could expect
a response in the near future regarding the letter and the request for a
meeting.


Here is the info from AA.  Talk to you at 4.  Thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/10/2000
11:17 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/17/99 01:08 PM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Charlie Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel
Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: George Fastuca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Compression Services Agreement

Interesting.  I'll work with MKM and Maria on getting answers to AA's
questions and comments.  I think we can eliminate the specific cross
references between the two agreements, but is that the real problem or is AA
going to choke on our execution of both agreements with the same party?
(that's a tough one to wire around, if it is their real concern).  Thanks.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/17/99 01:03
PM ---------------------------

Heather Mueck
12/17/99 09:32 AM
To: George Fastuca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stanley Farmer/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Roger Willard/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Compression Services Agreement

George -

Stan asked that I forward our comments on to you regarding the TW Compression
Services Agreement and the Purchase and Sale Agreement.  If you would like to
discuss, we will be available early next week.  Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Mueck/AA/Corp/Enron on 12/17/99
09:24 AM ---------------------------

Stanley Farmer
11/29/99 12:44 PM
To: Heather Mueck/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: TW Compression Services Agreement

---------------------- Forwarded by Stanley Farmer/AA/Corp/Enron on 11/29/99
12:43 PM ---------------------------

George Fastuca
11/24/99 09:06 AM
To: Stanley Farmer/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Roger
Willard/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: TW Compression Services Agreement

Stan, attached is the latest draft of the compression services agreement
related to the TW compression monetization effort. Since you've reviewed it
last, nothing material has changed as you can see from the red-lined version.
We would like to file for regulatory approval soon. Pls let me know if you
have any questions - thanks.

 I'll send the updated PSA agreement in a separate Email.

---------------------- Forwarded by George Fastuca/ET&S/Enron on 11/24/99
08:58 AM ---------------------------

Maria Pavlou
11/19/99 10:57 AM
To: George Fastuca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: TW Compression Services Agreement

In case you didn't have this old message.  Below is the latest draft of the
Services Agreement.  I will also reforward to you the latest drafts/exhibits
of the Purchase and Sale Agreement.  Thanks, Maria
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron on 11/19/99 10:56
AM ---------------------------

Maria Pavlou
11/05/99 04:33 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George
Fastuca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Charlie
Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kim Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donald Vignaroli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Compression Services Agreement

Attached is a revised redlined draft of the above-referenced  Agreement which
incorporates comments from regulatory and Mike Bryant with V&E.  We have
added a new Appendix 1 to cover the Assets subject to this Agreement rather
than refer to the Exhibit in the Purchase and Sale, as well as an exclusivity
provision regarding use of the Assets.  We've also added a reference to the
arbitration section in the event the oversight committee cannot agree to
changes necessary or desirable to the assets.


========================================================
From KHOU-TV's Dr. Neil Frank & Reliant Energy W.A.R.N. :
========================================================
WTNT72 KNHC 260830

SPFAT2

SUBTROPICAL STORM TWO PROBABILITIES NUMBER   7

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL

5 AM AST MON NOV 26 2001

PROBABILITIES FOR GUIDANCE IN HURRICANE PROTECTION

PLANNING BY GOVERNMENT AND DISASTER OFFICIALS

AT 5 AM AST...0900Z...THE STORM CENTER WAS LOCATED NEAR

LATITUDE 30.2 NORTH...LONGITUDE  55.6 WEST

CHANCES OF CENTER OF THE STORM PASSING WITHIN 65 NAUTICAL MILES

OF LISTED LOCATIONS THROUGH  2AM AST THU NOV 29 2001

LOCATION           A  B  C  D  E   LOCATION           A  B  C  D  E

30.5N  56.0W      99  X  X  X 99   30.5N  56.0W      99  X  X  X 99

30.5N  56.0W      99  X  X  X 99   BERMUDA            X  X  1  5  6

COLUMN DEFINITION   PROBABILITIES IN PERCENT

A IS PROBABILITY FROM NOW TO  2AM TUE

FOLLOWING ARE ADDITIONAL PROBABILITIES

B FROM  2AM TUE TO  2PM TUE

C FROM  2PM TUE TO  2AM WED

D FROM  2AM WED TO  2AM THU

E IS TOTAL PROBABILITY FROM NOW TO  2AM THU

X MEANS LESS THAN ONE PERCENT

FORECASTER FRANKLIN

WWWW
========================================================
This message is brought to you by KHOU-TV 11/Reliant Energy W.A.R.N.
For instant weather on the web or to learn more about our Wide Area Radar
Net (W.A.R.N) visit our website at:  http://www.khou.com
=======================================================

Need to change you weather bulletin settings, going on vacation, or
wish to unsubscribe? Click the link below to do so.

http://khou.weatherwarn.net/wxwarn/index.asp?stn=KHOU

TROUBLE UNSUBSCRIBING OR SUBSCRIBING?
FOLLOW THIS LINK FOR HELP! :
http://khou.com/newwxwarn/troubleshooting.htm

WeatherWarn 2000
========================================================


Here's the gov's analysis of the MOU.  Have a good weekend.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/28/2001 01:26 PM -----

 - Governor's cost-benefit for MOU.pdf


Send it to my attention.

On another issue,  please give me a call ASAP re WG Shaner.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


December		Scheduled

Saturday 08
West			(1105)
San Juan		   857
East			  (288)

Sunday   09
West			(1101)
San Juan		   837
East			  (316)

Monday   10
West			(1110)
San Juan		   842
East			  (273)

Notes:  Quite Weekend


NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Year End 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s).
Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation
is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete requests for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com
and select Perform Review under Performance Review Services.  You may begin
providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms
completed by Friday, November 17, 2000.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:

Houston: 1.713.853.4777, Option 4
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4
Email: perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."   Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Nov 17, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
ANDREWS, NAVEEN C               RUDI C ZIPTER                   Oct 31, 2000
BAXTER, ASHLEY                  DAVID DAVIES                    Nov 02, 2000
CAMPOS, HECTOR O                PEYTON S GIBNER                 Nov 06, 2000
CARSON, RICHARD L               RICHARD B BUY                   Oct 30, 2000
CRENSHAW, SHIRLEY J             WINCENTY J KAMINSKI             Oct 26, 2000
GORNY, VLADIMIR                 THEODORE R MURPHY II            Nov 02, 2000
KINDALL, KEVIN                  VASANT SHANBHOGUE               Oct 30, 2000
LAMAS VIEIRA PINTO, RODRIGO     DAVID PORT                      Oct 31, 2000
RAYMOND, MAUREEN J              WINCENTY J KAMINSKI             Nov 02, 2000
SUPATGIAT, CHONAWEE             PEYTON S GIBNER                 Oct 27, 2000
TAMARCHENKO, TANYA V            VASANT SHANBHOGUE               Oct 26, 2000
VILLARREAL, NORMA E             SHEILA H WALTON                 Oct 26, 2000
WALTON, SHEILA H                DAVID OXLEY                     Oct 27, 2000
YAMAN, SEVIL                    VASANT SHANBHOGUE               Oct 27, 2000
YUAN, DING                      RICHARD L CARSON                Oct 31, 2000


I think so.  Probably some people in satellite offices too.  I heard it was mostly originators and middle marketers.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Franklin, Cynthia" <Cynthia.Franklin@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 1:18 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	RE: Judy

I didn't hear a word about it. Was it the marketing company?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Franklin, Cynthia
Subject: RE: Judy

I heard that El Paso had cuts on Friday.  Did that impact you guys at all?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Franklin, Cynthia" <Cynthia.Franklin@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, January 28, 2002 11:20 AM
   To:     Germany, Chris
   Subject:  RE: Judy

   Is she full time?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
   Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:14 AM
   To: Franklin, Cynthia
   Subject: RE: Judy

   Yes maam, she's UBS now.  She was just down here too.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Franklin, Cynthia" <Cynthia.Franklin@ElPaso.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Monday, January 28, 2002 10:56 AM
      To:     Germany, Chris
      Subject:  Judy

      Chris,
      I didn't remember if your email mentioned Judy. Did she make it?

      Cindy Franklin
      Transportation Services
      Work:832.676.3177
      Fax: 832.676.1329
      Pager: 1.888.509.3736

      ******************************************************************
      This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
      Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
      use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
      If you have received this email in error please notify the
      sender.
      ******************************************************************

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************

   ******************************************************************
   This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
   Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
   use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
   If you have received this email in error please notify the
   sender.
   ******************************************************************

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


After giving it some thought I think just naming Debbie as executor and agent
is the best course of action.  Debbie is fine with this approach.  Thank you.


thanks,
m


KM Project Sponsors and Task Force Members,

Attached below is the Knowledge Management Pilot Project Charter and
Executive Summary.  Please review and sign the charter by close of business
Friday, December 1.  Send signed charters to my attention at EB4734a.  If you
have any questions, feel free to contact me at 3 9698.

Thank you,

Marie Hejka


IP, Georgia-Pacific, and Weyerhaeuser
   launch on-line marketplace

   PURCHASE, N.Y., ATLANTA, and FEDERAL WAY, Wash., March
   23, 2000 (PRNewswire) - International Paper, Georgia-Pacific
   Corp. and Weyerhaeuser Co. today jointly announced that they
   intend to develop a global business-to-business marketplace to
   enable buying and selling of paper and forest products on-line.

   The companies will take a leadership role to facilitate the utilization
   of Internet technology to enhance service to customers and
   increase efficiency with suppliers. The electronic marketplace will
   create a foundation for common industry standards to simplify and
   accelerate the adoption of electronic commerce across the
   industry.

   The marketplace will operate as an independent entity with its own
   board of directors and management team. Initially, the three
   founding companies will each have an equal equity position, but it is
   expected that more partners will join the initiative. Based on
   demonstrated success, the companies will consider taking the
   entity public.

   The paper and forest products industry in the United States ships
   more than $200 billion worth of products annually. By working
   together to establish an electronic marketplace, the three leading
   companies in the industry believe they can benefit customers by
   simplifying transaction processes, improving information flow and
   increasing speed of delivery, thereby reducing costs. Providing
   both procurement and sales functions means the on-line
   marketplace will also enable participating companies to streamline
   purchasing operations, reduce inventories, cut internal costs and
   increase capital efficiency in the industry.

   The three companies immediately will begin conducting a search
   for a chief executive officer for the new operation and are assessing
   potential technology partners to add state-of-the-art expertise to the
   enterprise. The companies plan to promptly complete a definitive
   agreement, finalize a business plan and enlist additional strategic
   partners, including forest products companies and affiliated industry
   firms.

   John T. Dillon, International Paper's chairman and chief executive
   officer, said, "This is a substantial commitment on the part of three
   industry leaders to develop a comprehensive electronic
   marketplace for the forest and paper sector. As manufacturers,
   marketers and distributors of a broad array of products, we will
   collectively bring expertise and resources to this effort."

   A.D. "Pete" Correll, Georgia-Pacific's chairman and chief executive
   officer, said, "This is a bold move for the paper and forest products
   industry. It is a defining step in our industry's positioning in the
   electronic business-to-business marketplace. Our companies
   immediately bring products and distribution capability through our
   active, joint participation."

   Steven R. Rogel, Weyerhaeuser's chairman, president and chief
   executive, said, "Rapidly evolving technology is dramatically
   changing the global marketplace. This initiative will aggressively
   shape the electronic marketplace in the paper and forest products
   industry to ensure our industry meets the current and future needs of
   our customers. It will also promote better relationships with other
   trade partners, such as suppliers."

   Executives representing the three companies who will serve as a
   steering committee include Marianne M. Parrs, executive vice
   president, International Paper; and John N. Balboni, vice president -
   e-business, International Paper; David J. Paterson, vice president -
   electronic commerce, Georgia-Pacific; and Robert A. Renner,
   director - electronic commerce, Georgia-Pacific; and Mack L.
   Hogans, senior vice president - corporate affairs with acting
   responsibility for electronic business, Weyerhaeuser; and Darien E.
   Roseen, vice president, strategic planning, Weyerhaeuser. Morgan
   Stanley Dean Witter has been selected to provide financial
   consulting services for this initiative.

   Until the electronic marketplace is up and running, which is subject
   to appropriate governmental and other approvals, the companies
   will continue to conduct sales and procurement activities as normal.
   International Paper's previously announced relationship with
   PaperExchange.com will remain part of the company's
   e-commerce strategy.

   International Paper is the world's largest paper and forest products
   company. Businesses include printing papers, packaging, building
   materials, chemical products and distribution. Headquartered in the
   United States at Purchase, N.Y., International Paper has operations
   in nearly 50 countries, employs nearly 100,000 people and exports
   its products to more than 130 nations.

   Georgia-Pacific, headquartered at Atlanta, is one of the world's
   leading manufacturers and distributors of pulp, paper and building
   products. It consists of two distinct operating groups -- The
   Georgia-Pacific Group, which includes the pulp, paper and building
   products businesses, and The Timber Company, which manages
   4.7 million acres of timberland in North America. The company
   employs more than 55,000 people at 500 locations in the United
   States and Canada.

   Weyerhaeuser Company, one of the world's largest integrated
   forest products companies, was incorporated in 1900. In 1999,
   sales were $12.3 billion. It has offices or operations in 13 countries,
   with customers worldwide. Weyerhaeuser is principally engaged in
   the growing and harvesting of timber; the manufacture, distribution
   and sale of forest products; and real estate construction,
   development and related activities.


Hi Everybody!
?
Over the holidays, I installed the CD-ROM for  Mom and Dad's second free year
of Dellnet service.? Because Dellnet is  combining with MSN, Mom and Dad's
email address had to be changed.? It is  now rex04@msn.com . Their old
address still  works and probably will continue to work until the end of
January, so if you  sent something to them recently using the old address,
they should still get  it.? From now on, though, it would probably be best to
use the new address  so Mom doesn't have to retrieve email for both addresses.
?
Thanks,
?
?
Phil


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
03:29 PM ---------------------------

Rachel Vargas <rvargas@hbs.edu> on 02/23/2000 01:40:29 PM
To: gljackson2@tva.gov, "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: ptufano@hbs.edu
Subject: Real Options Conf. Call

Good afternoon!

This is just to confirm that the Real Options Conference call will be
Thursday, February 24 at 1:30pm Central Time, 2:30pm Eastern Standard Time.

Thank you all for your patience and co-operation with this matter.

Sincerely,

Rachel Vargas
Asst. to Prof. Tufano

I have just been informed from Mr. Kaminski's assistant, Shirley, that his
flight was cancelled and he will, therefore, be unavailable to participate in
the conference call on Thursday, February 24.? Therefore, Mr. Kaminski's
office proposes to reschedule the call to a new time of 1:30pm Central Time,
2:30pm Eastern Time on Thursday, February 24 (same day).

Please let me know as soon as possible if all parties can participate at this
time.? If not, we will need to reschedule until next  week.

Many thanks,

Rachel Vargas
Asst. to Prof. Tufano

Dear Mr. Jackson and Mr. Kaminski:

Good afternoon!

I just wanted to make sure you both understood that the Real Options
Conference, being held on Thursday, February 24 from 1:30-2pm, will be
Eastern Standard Time.

Many thanks,

Rachel Vargas
Asst. to Prof. Tufano

Dear Mr. Jackson and Mr. Kaminski:

This is to confirm that the March Real Options Conference call with Peter
Tufano will be held on Thursday, February 24 from 1:30-2pm. Mr. Jackson, I
have spoken with Suzanne and confirmed that the conference call will
originate from Peter Tufano's office.? Mr. Kaminski, I left a message in your
assistant's voicemail (Shirley), and I also spoke with Mr. Kevin Moore to
arrange this time.? Again, Professor Tufano will initiate this conference
call.

Many thanks.

Sincerely,

Rachel Vargas
Asst. to Prof. Tufano

********************
Rachel D. Vargas
Morgan Hall 370
Harvard Business School
Soldiers Field Road
Boston, MA 02163

P:? 617 495-6521
F:? 617 496-6592
email:? rvargas@hbs.edu
********************


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Charles H. Yeung
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Charles Yeung October 2001
Report Total: $6,593.91
Amount Due Employee: $6,593.91

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Another one for you .................
Regards, Kim

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cowan, Beth
Sent:	04 October 2001 14:57
To:	Ward, Kim
Subject:	FW:  **Rancho La Puerta's Yoga Program Applauded**

Kim-
The spa I went to sent me this recently - the website is www.rancholapuerta.com and it is really good (it will sell you on it) - thought you might be interested!
Beth
Beth Cowan
Enron Freight Markets
Phone: 713-853-9868
Fax: 713-853-6061

-----Original Message-----
From:	Rancho.La.Puerta.reservations@rancholapuerta.com
[mailto:Rancho.La.Puerta.reservations@rancholapuerta.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:25 AM
Subject:	**Rancho La Puerta's Yoga Program Applauded**

Dear Friend,
It is said that timing is everything. We particularly liked the timing of the September 7th USA TODAY front page of the Life Section.
USA TODAY has named Rancho La Puerta as the First of Ten Great Places to
Balance Body and Soul. The article notes that "This health and fitness
getaway favored by movers and shakers offers 'daily yoga and specialty
yoga weeks'...and ...'is for people who want a taste of yoga but want to
do more.' "
Upcoming Ranch yoga specialty weeks include:
October 6th - Yoga and Chi Kung presented by Mara Carrico
December 1st - Iyengar Yoga presented by Jennifer Fox & Phyllis Pilgrim
With blessings for your health and well being,

Holley, Isabelle, Heide, Sarah, Dawn, Veronica and Julia
Rancho La Puerta Reservations
(800) 443-7565
reservations@rancholapuerta.com
http://www.rancholapuerta.com


The following Budget Review Meetings have been set with Ken Lay, Greg Whalley and Mark Frevert.  Please confirm your attendance and send a list of attendees for your respective meetings.

	Oct. 22	1:00 - 3:00	Enron North America
	Oct. 24	8:30 - 10:30	Enron Europe
	Oct. 24	10:30 - 12:30	Enron Global Markets/Industrial Markets
	Nov. 5	1:00 - 3:00	EBS/ Other Wholesale
	Nov. 5	3:00 - 5:00	Enron Energy Services
	Nov. 8	1:00 - 3:00	EGAS
	Nov. 8	3:00 - 5:00	ETS PGE

All meetings are currently scheduled in 50M Dining

	North America
		John Lavorato
		Louise Kitchen
		Wes Colwell

	Europe			(Kerry, does this meeting need to be a video conference?)
		John Sherriff
		Michael Brown
		Fernley Dyson

	Global Markets/Industrial Markets
		Mike McConnell
		Jeff Shankman
		Brent Price

		Jeff McMahon
		Ray Bowen
		Kent Castleman

	EBS & Other EWS

		Jim Fallon
		David Cox
		Wes Colwell
		Greg Piper
		Sally Beck
		Mark Pickering

	EES

		Dave Delainey
		Janet Dietrich
		Wade Stubblefield

	EGAS

		Stan Horton
		Jim Hughes
		Jeff Sommers

	ETS & PGE

		Stan Horton
		Rod Hayslett


BP Whiting crude unit still down; unable to start up primary tower (atmospheric distillation tower ) over Thanksgiving weekend. BP was last mulling a restart of this tower then. Meanwhile, vacuum unit still down until about Dec. 7.

Crown refinery may be down for about a month in order to fix piping.

Phillips Borger Texas shutting a 14,000-bpd low sulfur diesel unit Monday for a two week turnaround.


Thank you for submitting the following responses on the RSVP
Online Form for the 2001 Enron Law Conference. The
information you submitted is as follows:

Attendance: Y
First Name: Kay
Last Name: Mann
Position: Business Attorney
Legal Group: Enron Wholesale Services
Phone: 713 345 7566
Fax:
Email: kay.mann@enron.com
Admin. Name: Suzanne Adams
Admin. Phone: 713 853 7340
Admin. Email: Suzanne.adams@enron.com
Arrival Date: May 2, 2001
Departure Date: May 4, 2001
Hotel Accommodations: King Sized Bed
Non-Smoking: Y
Other:
Thursday Activity: Relax at the Hotel - Do your own thing!
Golf Handicap:
Awards Dinner: Y
SAP Company: 0413
SAP Cost Center: 105659
State Bar Licensed: TEXAS
Bar #: 13344300

This message is a confirmation of the details of your RSVP
form.  If any of the information is incorrect or your plans
change, e-mail Sara Davidson with the information. Do not
make any changes on the website.


You are enrolled in the following class:

Applied Finance

Class Days and Times:
  1/27/2000  08:00:00 AM - 05:00:00 PM
  1/28/2000  08:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM
EB552,  Houston
No Show/Participant Fee: $700.00
Note: ***Department Policy Change-Upon completion of this session, your
Company & RC will be charged.

Please review any prerequisite material to validate your eligibility in this
class.

 We look forward to seeing you at 08:00:00 AM on 01/27/2000.  If you have any
questions, please call the ECT Development Center Team at 853-0357.

Thank you.


Return-Path: <Anjam.Ahmad@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-yh04.mx.aol.com (rly-yh04.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.36])
by air-yh03.mail.aol.com (v73.13) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2000 13:48:07 -0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-yh04.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2000 13:47:40 -0400
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id MAA21367 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 24 May 2000 12:47:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id MAA29789 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 24 May 2000 12:47:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (ecthou_gt2.corp.enron.com [172.16.4.33])
by dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA05924 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 24 May 2000 12:47:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 862568E9.0061BABE ; Wed, 24 May 2000 12:47:27 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Anjam Ahmad" <Anjam.Ahmad@enron.com>
To: "Shirley Crenshaw" <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
cc: "Grant Masson" <Grant.Masson@enron.com>, vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <862568E9.0061B982.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 18:45:17 +0100
Subject: Dates for Houston Visits
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Unknown

Hi Shirley,

[I just called Vince now as you said]

As promised, below are the final dates - it looks like we'll have to move the
dates back as there is no way I can be in Houston as early as June as I have
commitments already booked - there is a chance in early or mid July, but I'd
rather stay flexible and therefore will opt for a hotel to be expensed in
London
later.

Matthew Williams         Mon 31st July through Friday 18th August
Steve Leppard            Mon 21st Aug through Fri 15th Sep
Kirstee Hewitt           Mon 18th Sep through Friday 13th Oct
Ben Parsons              Mon 16th Oct through Friday 10th Nov

I think the best thing would be to arrange for the period Saturday 29th July
to
Sunday 12th November to cover the travel arrangements at each end.

Thanks,

Anjam
x35383


ALJ is allowing CDWR to assert $1.7B in Pacific NW case.
As noted the other day, their claim against Enron is small ($200,000), but this will expand ripple claims in a big way.

Link to Judge Cintron's Order

http://cips.ferc.fed.us/Q/CIPS/ELECTRIC/EL/EL01-10.0AA.TXT


Please use the next week to clean up our database of delivery locations and regions currently still in Enpower.   I would like to start the database clean with only the key hubs listed:

NEPOOL PTF
NY Zone J
NY Zone G
NY Zone A
Ontario
PJM East Hub
PJM West Hub
PJM West
Cinergy
Com-Ed
TVA
Entergy
SOCO
ERCOT South (FP)
ERCOT North (Basis)

Let's use this opportunity to clean up Enpower and start with a truly clean set of books.
Team - Am I missing anthing?

Kevin Presto
Vice President, East Power Trading
Phone:  713-853-5035
Cell:  713-854-3923
Fax:  713-646-8272


Start Date: 12/12/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121220.txt


Doug,

I have modified the 2001 Commercial Model Line Impact calculator to include the current Temple to Sandow line as a CSC.

Lance


Nope.  I think Gloria is though.  I know Victor is but he is out the rest of
this week.


Steve,
Congratulations.  Welcome back.  I sent you a note and a spreadsheet with the
deals we have booked in our system.  I was trying to reconcile them to your
list of deals.  I could not.  But I think the best thing to do is to simply
start over and book the deals you tell me to.  I just need the exact terms.
I know it's your first day back and you are probably swamped, but when you
get a chance, please give me a call.  Richard wants me to have these deals
valued by the end of this month's P&L.  Thanks.

DG
713-853-9573


Here is an update on new developments that have occurred over the past few days.

New Board Member & Committee Elected

Today, the Enron Board of Directors elected William Powers, Jr., the dean of The University of Texas School of Law in Austin, Texas, to the Board.  Bill currently holds the John Jeffers Research Chair in Law and the Hines H. Baker and Thelma Kelley Baker Chair in Law at The University of Texas School of Law, where he teaches tort, products liability, jurisprudence, legal process, civil procedure and contracts.  He received his J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1973.

Additionally, the Board established a Special Committee that will conduct an in-depth review of the transactions between Enron and entities connected to related parties.  The Special Committee, to be chaired by Bill, comprises independent directors Frank Savage, CEO of Savage Holding LLC as chairman, Paulo Ferraz Pereira, executive vice president of Brazilian-owned investment bank Group Bonanza, and Herbert S. Winokur, Jr., chairman and CEO of Capricorn Holdings, Inc.  The committee is authorized to take any actions it deems appropriate.

The committee has retained William R. McLucas, a former head of the Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), with the law firm of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering as its counsel.  Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering has retained Deloitte & Touche to provide independent accounting advice.

SEC Changes Inquiry to Investigation

We also reported today that the SEC has opened a formal investigation into related party transactions that have been the subject of media reports and were previously the subject of the SEC's formal inquiry.  This is not unusual and we welcome this investigation and are confident that this matter will finally be put to rest.

With so much publicity surrounding our company right now, I want to ask you to keep in mind that not all media reports are accurate or even based on factual information.  We are committed to communicating updates to you every day by voice mail, e-mail or both, so that you know the factual status of our company's situation.

We have created an Enron Updates Intranet site (<http://home.enron.com/updates/>) to keep you apprised of current events.  Please check back frequently for information and new developments.

I truly thank you for your continued hard work and support of our company.


Hi Guys

Slight change of plan on the counterparty front - we will be offering all
metals products (currently two phys products) to the following counterparties:

- All companies on new "A" list  (see Enron aluminium list.doc and Enron
copper list.doc below)
- All companies on the old "A" list (where we have a PA for the countries
they are trading from)  (see tif file below)
- All exisiting companies on EnronOnline (list as in EOL - copy will be
forwarded as soon as avail)

Please be aware that the companies on the new "A" list may be a subset of the
companies on the old "A" list.

Please proceed with your review process on the basis of the above.

Both "A" lists are attached below for your ease of reference.

Regards

Amita

 - Enron aluminium list.doc
 - Enron copper list.doc

  Old A list


Wow!  this looks complicated.  let me get some help on this and get back to you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Allen, Phillip K.
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 8:38 AM
To:	Whalley, Greg; Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW:

Greg,

After making an election in October to receive a full distribution of my deferral account under Section 6.3 of the plan, a disagreement has arisen regarding the Phantom Stock Account.

Section 6.3 states that a participant may elect to receive a single sum distribution of all of the participant's deferral accounts subject to a 10% penalty.  This provision is stated to be notwithstanding any other provision of the plan.  It also states that the account balance shall be determined as of the last day of the month preceding the date on which the committee receives the written request of the participant.  In my case this would be as of September 30th.  I read this paragraph to indicate a cash payout of 90% of the value of all deferrals as on September 30, 2001.  The plan administrators, however, interpret this paragraph differently.  Their reading yields a cash payout of 90% of the value for deferrals other than the Phantom Stock Account, which they believe should be paid with 90% of  Enron Corp. shares in the account as of September 30, 2001.  Their justification is that in several places throughout the plan document and brochures it is stated that the distributions of the Phantom Stock Account shall be made in shares of Enron Corp. common stock.

There are two reason that I do not agree with their interpretation.  First,  section 6.3 begins with "notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan."  This indicates that any other payout methodologies described in other sections of the plan which deal with normal distribution at termination do not apply.  Second, the language in section 6.3 stating "a single sum distribution of all of the Participant's deferral accounts" indicates that one payment will be made not a cash payment separate from a share distribution.

The interpretation of the administrators goes beyond section 6.3.  If that is the case then section 7.1 should apply.  This section does provide for the Phantom Stock Account to be paid in shares.  However, it states "The value of the shares, and resulting payment amount, will be based on the closing price of Enron Corp. common stock on the January 1 before the date of payment, and such payment shall be made in shares of Enron Corp common stock".  This would result in approximately 8.3 shares to be distributed for every share in the account on January 1, 2001.  Although this would be the most beneficial to the participants due to the decline of the value of Enron Corp. common stock from $83 to $10 per share,  this methodology goes beyond section 6.3.

The calculations below illustrate the difference in the value and method of distribution under each of the three interpretations:

Section 6.3		Plan Administrators		Section 7.1

Number of shares		6,600	shares		6,600	shares			6,600 shares
Relative share price		$27.23							$83.13
Phantom Stock Value		$179,718						$548,658
10% Penalty			-17,972			 -600				-54,866
Value to be distributed		$161,746		6,000 shares			$493,792
Current stock price									$10
Distribution			$161,746		6,000 shares			49,379 shares

I believe my interpretation under section 6.3 is correct and fair.  If the administrators insist on distributing shares instead of cash then section 7.1 should apply.  The current interpretation of the plan administrators is a hybrid between the two sections resulting in the lowest possible payout.

In addition to myself, Tom Martin, Scott Neal, and Don Black are facing the same issue.  I would appreciate your review and consideration of this matter.

Sincerely,

Phillip Allen


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are forced/resched/derated outages. Your daily delivery will still
contain these outages.

In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted like the daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to
load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR
ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS
E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 092001R.xls
 - 092001.xls


FYI.  I haven't read it yet, but thought I would pass it along anyway.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/11/2000 05:23
PM ---------------------------

	Don Hammond @ ECT

	10/11/2000

To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Change order for GE transformer--Pleasanton

Attached are files incorporating suggested revisions for the change order to
Contract 24-LM6K-2-99 for the purchase of a generator step-up transformer for
the Pleasanton Project.

In lieu of the Exhibit A of the draft you sent out, I have substituted
Exhibit A, the GE proposal dated October 9, 2000.

I have substituted Exhibit B, GE's standard specifications for generator
step-up transformers, for the EE&CC specifications in the earlier draft. GE's
proposal is quoted on the basis of their standard GSU transformer
specification. I have this only in hard copy and have a call into GE to
verify this is the applicable standard and whether it is available in
electronic form. I will give you a copy, Dale.

The two additional documents were transmitted along with GE's proposal and I
have referenced them in Part I, Paragraph 2.


Mr. Nemec,
?
???? My name is Chris Knudsen and? I? interviewed with you on Thursday, March
15th in respect to the Summer Clerkship position at Enron.? I am now trying
to solidify?my summer plans,?as well as studying for finals, and I was
wondering when I might find out about the position for this summer?? I would
greatly appreciate hearing?from you.
?
Thanks again for the opportunity?of speaking with you on the?15th.?
?
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????? Sincerely,
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????? Chris Knudsen
?
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????3210 Ashmont Ln.
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????Missouri City, Texas 77459
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????? (713) 557-5212

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Sirs,

A numerous times that it was mentioned that you have an open door policy,
and I am taking the opportunity to write this memo to inform you of issues
that I felt were not handled in the manner of the Enron's policies.

 In April of this year, there was a job posting for a position with Global
Markets for a Director of Transportation.  A business associate here at Enron
informed me that there was a position and it would fit my husband 's (Bob)
qualification and years of experience.  This business associate knew of my husband's
qualifications from business dealing when employed by EI/EECC.

I submitted Bob's resume on line for this position, in fact there
were two positions, one for Director and Manager.  Within a week he
received a phone call from a Mr.Peter Weinberg of Human Resources to discuss
the possibility of an interview and to discuss in further detail about his
experience.  Mr. Weinberge and Bob corresponded a number of times
that week, Mr. Weinberge requested on a Wednesday evening that my
husband fill out an questionnaire that would further demonstrate Bob's
qualifications.  Mr. Weinberge stated that he needed it by Thursday so he
can present this to the hiring manager, Mr.Martin Gleason.  Bob was lead to believe
that he had a possibility of an interview.

No additional correspondence was again heard from Mr. Weinberge, in fact,
through other sources, I found out a candidate was extended an offer for the
position on Thursday.

 Both my husband and me were not upset that he did not get an interview, but
was disappointed with the lack of integrity from HR.  If HR had a candidate
in mind, why would they contact my husband and have him take the time to
work on the questionnaire?

It is understandable that they offered the position to a candidate, but Bob
should have received some type of correspondence from the HR representative.
Bob did call Peter in June and Mr.Weinberge told him that he was
surprised that my husband never received any correspondence from the hiring
manager.

I fully understand that internal candidates should be considered first, but
it is very disappointing to see the situation handled in this manner.  The
company prides itself on open Communication and Integrity, but this is not
the first time such an occurrence has happened.
.
Since the first initial contact between Bob and HR, there have been a few
positions posted in the Global Markets area.  The postings have stated they
are looking for candidates  with transportation/contract negotiation experience,
and not once did we hear from HR for a possibility of an interview.

I do not know if this letter will change anything, but I could not just let
it go.  I thank you very much for taking time out of your busy schedule to
review this.  I look forward to hearing from you.


What I meant by the term "electric disconnect", which I thought was catchy
but may have been inartful, was simply that supply and demand signals were
screwed up.  This is the "Shelly Corman" argument, which may or may not have
any factual basis, but I put it in there to have it in front of people for
discussion.

	Steven J Kean
	12/12/2000 02:07 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

Given the way the numbers came out, I guess we don't need the talking points,
but we should still try to get to the bottom of this because we will be
called on to comment to regulators and media.  Unless we have strong evidence
to the contrary, it seems to me that wholesale markets are working .... they
are open and they are competitive.  On the other hand, retail gas markets
suffer from the same problems as electric markets ... they are not open,
customers don't have effective choices and price signals don't get through,
so there is no demand response when prices rise.

On the points raised in the attachment, I'm still not sure I follow point 4.
Also what does" electric disconnect" mean?

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/12/2000 02:40 PM

		 To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron,
Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

Leslie:  Looks good.  Just a couple of comments:

1. General
May want to point out that the roots of California's current gas woes are the
same ones causing the electric problem---combined effect of California's
"import-based" energy policy and the state's failure to invest in in-state
infrastructure.  California imports about 25% of its electricity, but about
80-90 percent of its gas supply.  California has failed to invest in the
in-state infrastructure necessary to support increased gas demand over the
last decade.  So we've got an interstate pipeline superhighway to the border
and a dirt road of in-state transportation once you get into California.
The last bullet seems to suggest that manipulation may be taking place.  Can
we support that suggestion, and is it one that we want to make necessarily?
If we do suggest that manipulation may in part explain current prices, do we
need to propose ways to eliminate it?  Otherwise, seems that we may be giving
FERC ammunition to take action without trying to "steer" that action in the
right direction.  Maybe I'm reading too much into the bullet.

2. Specific
Competition for gas coming to California has increased significantly.  The
midwest (via Alliance) is competing away Canadian gas.  The Southwest
(Nevada, Arizona) is competing away supply from the Southwest before it hits
the California border.

	Mary Hain@ECT
	12/12/2000 11:58 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 10:07 AM
---------------------------
To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

We thought it would be good to basically give Chair Hoecker talking points
with any numbers that Enron provides.  We will visit on these later today
when the numbers are ready (before 3:00).  Comments?
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner@ENRON on 12/12/2000 11:56 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M
Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Talking points about California Gas market

Here is my stab at the talking points  to be sent in to FERC along with the
gas pricing info they requested for the California markets.  Let me or
Christi know if you have any disagreements, additions, whatever.  I am
supposed to be out of here at 2:15 today, so if you have stuff to add after
that, get it to Christi.  Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
12:05 PM ---------------------------

Jackson Logan
11/28/2000 10:49 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: When does Simms get a private bongo party?

Scary.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackson Logan/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 10:48
AM ---------------------------

"Tara Talbot" <ttalbot@bmoh.com> on 11/28/2000 10:36:46 AM
To: <Peter_Bourland@adc.com>, <brian.holmes@algx.com>, <JLewis1342@aol.com>,
<JRayb10104@aol.com>, <Jeffrey.T.Harris@betzdearborn.com>,
<rsteel@border.net>, <mfriou@citysearch.com>, <JRBridenstine@cs.com>,
<ajohnston@doubleclick.net>, <sarah.goerner@dynegy.co.uk>,
<Jackson.Logan@enron.com>, <james.hull@enron.com>,
<jennifer_berryhill@excite.com>, <amanda@greenberg-co.com>,
<medunkin@hotmail.com>, <tifftalbot@hotmail.com>, <akent@khmx.com>,
<jknight@knightrealestate.com>, <pkettler@reliantenergy.nl>,
<knust@rice.edu>, <ronnye.e.kettler@usa.conoco.com>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: When does Simms get a private bongo party?

>>> "christine_petru@gensler.com" 11/28/00 10:31AM >>>

Note: forwarded message attached.

From: "Ryan, Beau B" <Beau_Ryan@AIMFUNDS.COM>
To: "Cross, Ted D" <Ted_Cross@AIMFUNDS.COM>, "Kayser, Tony Y."
  <Tony_Kayser@AIMFUNDS.COM>, "Miracle, Jed A"
<Jed_Miracle@AIMFUNDS.COM>,  'Big Al' <alexhewes@hotmail.com>, 'Brad'
<brad_ryan@dell.com>,  "'carey.t.ford@ArthurAndersen.com'"
<carey.t.ford@ArthurAndersen.com>,  'darin preston'
<headtoheadirrigation@ev1.net>,  "'ed_cardenas@hotmail.com'"
<ed_cardenas@hotmail.com>, 'eddie c'
  <edgar.a.cardenas@us.pwcglobal.com>, "'Hanna, Michael'"
  <HannaM@VANKAMPEN.COM>, "'harry.painter@ac.com'"
<harry.painter@ac.com>,  "'jkorman@worldnet.att.net'"
<jkorman@worldnet.att.net>, 'Jones'
  <skjones_99@yahoo.com>, 'Kyle Bradford' <kyle_bradford@hotmail.com>,
'Little G' <kyle.bradford@ssmb.com>, "'MrkhartIII@aol.com'"
  <MrkhartIII@aol.com>, 'rash' <jrash@kpmg.com>, 'Rob'
  <anderpup@hotmail.com>, 'russell' <rpainter@tosco.com>,
"'ryaf@softchoice.com'" <ryaf@softchoice.com>, 'Sweet Muecke'
  <bmuecke@concentric.net>, 'Vegas Jed' <howard@rice.edu>, 'Wren'
  <jlwren@hotmail.com>

 - NEW_BONGO_PARTNERS.JPG


I concur with Mark.

HK

Mark Fisher
04/17/2002 11:55 AM
To: Matthew Meyers/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: International Lightning Detection Conf

I don't know why not.

Matthew Meyers
04/17/2002 11:41 AM
To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: International Lightning Detection Conf

Greetings

I am interested in submitting the paper for the AWEA conf to the ILDC.  They
said that the April 1st deadline can be ignored.

http://www.lightningstorm.com/ls2/about/events/ildc/index.jsp

May I go ahead and submit?

Matt Meyers


Is there any migration risk, i.e., can customers choose in Connecticutt?
That will be one of the first questions.