I think that the goal of Govt Affairs should be to (1) ensure that customers
never on utility service post Jan 17 should not pay, and (2) try and find a
compromise with the other parties to allow customers who leave by some date
certain will only pay for the unrecovered cost  on a $/mwh basis.

Basically I am arguing that Enron should require DWR to calculate its unpaid
balance on some date certain and determine the appropriate surcharge.   I
know that this is a very long shot.  We should make this recommendation as a
help to our business teams even if we are going to lose.

Do  we need a conference call with Lobbyists to work through this on Thursday?

Jim

 ---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 07/03/2001
02:30 PM ---------------------------

Scott Stoness@EES
07/03/2001 09:33 AM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Don Black, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Draft Bond Legislation Language

As discussed, we have two possible approaches:
1) Home Run Strategy: The following change: The commission shall, within 30
days from the date of the application, issue a bond financing order
establishing a DWR Bond Charge that shall be applicable to all electric power
delivered in California by electric corporations subject to the jurisdiction
of the commission, with the exception of electric power delivered by
suppliers other than the utility, who contracted for such delivery prior to
the effective date of this legislation.
We use San Diego large customers as our example of customers who should be
exempt from a surcharge because they have been off bundled rates for the
duration of the turmoil.
Risk is that our customers will not be fully on until about August 15.  Thus
if the wording gets changed to "who are taking delivery as of the effective
date of this legislation" we have failed.
Positive is that it removes the CPUC (anti enron) discretion.

2) 1st Base Strategy: The following change: c) The commission shall conduct
such proceedings as it deems necessary to inform the public of the revenue
requirements  and to establish rates to enable the department to recover the
revenue requirement.  Such rates will be designed  i) such that the bond
revenue requirements will be recovered, and ii) to reflect the amount of DWR
bond costs that the customer or customer class caused.
Risk is that the CPUC will interpret these words unfavorably to us.  ie.  If
we touch the system once we pay the whole surcharge.

Scott

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Stoness/HOU/EES on 07/03/2001 09:14
AM ---------------------------

Scott Stoness
07/03/2001 08:40 AM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Don Black, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Draft Bond Legislation Language

Harry.  I read through the proposed legislation.  In summary it:
Imposes a DWR Bond surcharge applicable to all electric power delivered in
California .... subject to the jurisdiction of the commission.
The commission would approve the adjustments to the DWR Bond Charge as may be
necessary to ensure timely recovery....
The commission would conduct hearings to establish rates to allow the DWR to
recover their revenue requirements.
The DWR Bond Charge shall take precedence over all other costs and
disbursements to be padi from the fund and shall be paid from revenue derived
from rate levels in effect on July 31, 2001.

Although we could live with this legislation the issues I see are:
IBM would not escape a surcharge even though they may not have caused any DWR
costs.
SImilarly, large San Diego customers, who have not caused any DWR costs,
would be subject to a surcharge.
I am having a hard time understanding what they intended to achieve with the
clause "The DWR Bond Charge shall take precedence over all other costs and
disbursements to be paid from the fund and shall be paid from revenue derived
from rate levels in effect on July 31, 2001."
Does the 2nd half of this sentence freeze the Jul 31, 2001 rates until the
bond is paid off; or
Is it just an attempt to define that rates should not go up to pay for the
bonds; or [this is the most likely meaning in my mind]
Is it just defining that the act comes into effect on July 31, 2001

If it is possible, we should advocate:
Regarding, SDG&E, customers who did not contribute to DWR costs:
Imposes a DWR Bond surcharge applicable to all electric power delivered in
California .... subject to the jurisdiction of the commission.
The commission would conduct hearings to establish rates to allow the DWR to
recover their revenue requirements.  Such rates will be designed  i) such
that the bond revenue requirements will be recovered, and ii) to reflect the
amount of DWR costs that the customer or customer class caused.

And we should get a legal interpretation of  "The DWR Bond Charge shall take
precedence over all other costs and disbursements to be paid from the fund
and shall be paid from revenue derived from rate levels in effect on July 31,
2001."  To make sure that we are not going to get surprised.

Scott


Ever wonder what happens to the ideas in the Idea Vault?  The possibilities
are almost endless, but here is how your idea might be "discovered":
Putting your idea in the Idea Vault gets it in front of everyone at Enron.
You might make a connection with someone on the other side of the world who
is working on a similar concept.
The eThink team checks regularly, and, when we know who might be able to
help, we route ideas to various people at Enron.
Various business groups check the Idea Vault in their weekly staff meetings
to see if Enron's next big initiative is waiting there.
The Enron Xcelerator is looking for fresh business initiatives, and they
might find some in the Idea Vault.

Visit the ThinkBank today and make a deposit or a withdrawal!

Tuesday, Mar. 6, at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Judy Schlesinger on eSpeak.
Judy, the manager of eSource, will be on hand to answer your questions and
explain how the eSource research group's industry specialists and resources
can help you gain a competitive advantage.

If you attended or watched the all-employee meeting on Feb. 21, you heard
Jeff and Ken introduce our new vision "To Become the World's Leading
Company."  What do you think it will take to make this happen?  Share your
ideas in the new eMeet category:  "The World's Leading Company:  What Will it
Take?"


I agree with Paul's idea I am preparing, as per your instructions, the sales contract.  I need to know if I will charge Humberto all the months at MB + 12.  Please let me know.

Saludos

From:	Paul YBarbo/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/30/2001 11:57 AM CDT
To:	Javier Chavarria/ENRON@enronXgate, Miguel Maltes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Curran/CA/Enron@Enron, Federico Haeussler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:	RE: LPG Supply to Humberto

Gentlemen,

It seems to me that the price should be MB plus $0.12 for every month. The last cargo purchase saw a value gain for ProCaribe through optimization of the pricing structure by using price swaps. The prices below transfer that value gain away from ProCaribe. I cannot tell if the value is being transferred to the Progasco sale or to Tropigas. Comments???

Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chavarria, Javier
Sent:	Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:43 AM
To:	Maltes, Miguel; Curran, Greg; Y'Barbo, Paul; Haeussler, Federico
Subject:	LPG Supply to Humberto

In order to provide Humberto the short term supply we have been talking about for a while, and to secure a 5-cent margin for Procaribe as agreed to with Mariella, we will sell him the product with the following terms:

Term:	4 months @ 1MM gal/mo.
Start Date:  On closing of Progasco sale (June)

Pricing: (depending on month of delivery)
	June		MB + 11.25
	July		MB + 11.00
	August		MB + 12.00
	September	MB + 12.00
	October		MB + 12.00

Miguel has a model contract approved by Coralina with the rest of the standard terms.  I suggest we send it to Humberto so he is ready to go by closing.
JC


I have approximately 25 tickets for tonight's rodeo performance of Lonestar &
Brad Paisley. If you are interested please come by my new location of EB1190A
and pick up your tickets.

Thanks!
Dolores


Jim,
Please adjust the sithe storage account to a price of $0, instead of wacog.
This adjustment should not have to go back any further than 11/99.  The
Pipeline is Union Gas Limited and the storage contract number is 96041510.
Please shout with any questions.  Jennifer, this should eliminate the current
outstanding variances and create a variances for all past months that have
been cleaned up.  The P&L impact of the new variances should be minimal due
to the small volume nature of these transactions in the past.  I believe the
variances will be a gain.
Thanks for you help guys.
PL
3-7376


Erica, the phone call on Tuesday, May 15, at 10:00 a.m. (CDT) between Messrs.
Murdock and Skilling is confirmed.  Thank you for your patience while we
worked this out on our end.  We'll await Mr. Murdock's call.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

Erica Harris <EHarris@insightpartners.com> on 05/14/2001 01:46:00 PM
To: "'Jeff.Skilling@enron.com'" <Jeff.Skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Sheri:

Thanks for the response.  Our next dinner is scheduled for September 25, at
the moment I'm not sure who the other invitees would be.  Jerry would
probably have a better idea as he puts together the guest list for each
event and may already have something in mind.  That's actually another
reason why I think we should leave the call tomorrow on the calendar.
Depending on Mr. Skillings availability/interest Jerry might want to
reconfigure his invitee list for the most appropriate mix of people.

Regards,
Erica Harris

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Skilling@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:38 PM
To: Erica Harris
Cc: Joannie.Williamson@enron.com
Subject: RE: Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Erica, thanks for the note.  Joannie has left the office for the day, but
will return tomorrow morning.

In the meantime, I'll run this by Jeff to see if he thinks it makes sense.
Do you have any dates for future dinners in mind?  The vast majority of
Jeff's time is committed through February 2002, so knowing what the
dates/timeframes are would be most helpful in the event we need to try to
free up some time.  Thank you.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

Erica Harris <EHarris@insightpartners.com> on 05/14/2001 12:16:12 PM

To:   "'Jeff.Skilling@enron.com'" <Jeff.Skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Probably the best thing is for the call to go ahead, that way Jerry can
brief Mr. Skilling on our plans for the remaining dinners throughout the
year and Mr. Skilling can decide on the best one for him to attend.

Does that sound feasible to you?
Erica

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Skilling@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 1:10 PM
To: Erica Harris
Subject: Re: Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Erica, Jeff is currently scheduled to be on vacation July 19.  Would it be
possible to schedule during the next quarter?

Thanks,
Joannie

Erica Harris <EHarris@insightpartners.com> on 05/14/2001 12:09:54 PM

To:   "'jeff.skilling@enron.com'" <jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Telephone Call with Jerry Murdock

Dear Mr. Skilling:

I write on behalf of Jerry Murdock, who is currently in Europe.  Mr.
Murdock
asked me to pass on the following information regarding your telephone call
scheduled for 10:00am (CST) on Tuesday, May 15.

Insight Capital hosts a quarterly dinner with Robert Rubin and Steve
Friedman and other selected guests.  Our next dinner is scheduled for July
19 and will be held in Aspen, Colorado.  The Current State of the Global
Market will be one of the topics under discussion and Jack Welch of GE is
one of your fellow invitees.

The purpose of your conversation with Mr. Murdock is to discuss the above
in
more detail and to more fully brief you on the purpose of these dinners.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further
information.

Erica Harris
Insight Capital Partners
680 Fifth Avenue
8th Floor
New York, NY  10019
(212) 230-9276

_______________________________________________________
This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
information.
If it has been sent to you in error, please reply immediately to advise the
sender of the error and then destroy this message, any copies of this
message and any printout of this message.  If you are not the intended
recipient of the message, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or
copying of the material in this message, and any attachments to the
message,
is strictly forbidden.

_______________________________________________________
This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
information.
If it has been sent to you in error, please reply immediately to advise the
sender of the error and then destroy this message, any copies of this
message and any printout of this message.  If you are not the intended
recipient of the message, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or
copying of the material in this message, and any attachments to the
message,
is strictly forbidden.

_______________________________________________________
This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information.
If it has been sent to you in error, please reply immediately to advise the
sender of the error and then destroy this message, any copies of this
message and any printout of this message.  If you are not the intended
recipient of the message, any unauthorized dissemination, distribution or
copying of the material in this message, and any attachments to the message,
is strictly forbidden.


Thanks Jim S.

I suggest that we notify AEP of this amount during our meeting with them this week.  We also need to develop a process of how we are going to update them of the impending volumes at the end of May without compromising our trading position.

Tom M. please discuss with Jim and we can cover at the meeting on the June bid week deal approval process that Lillian is arranging.

Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:58 AM
To:	Redmond, Brian
Cc:	Martin, Thomas A.; Gray, Barbara; Coffey, James; Baumbach, David; Colwell, Wes; Soignet, Kenny
Subject:	Bammel Working Gas Sale To AEP

As of today May 9, 2001 Bammel has working gas of approximately 20.3 TBTU.  Economics are favorable to keep injecting.  I estimate that injections will average around 1TBTU per week through May 31, 2001 which would result in another 3+ TBTU beibng injected.  At the current pricing level this means that AEP would owe Enron somewhere around $98 million.  Is this something Accounting should be working into the AEP settlement to pay Enron on June 1, 2001?  Should AEP be notified of the volume and approximate value.  Is there anything that needs to be done contractually other than the original agrrement to facilitate this transaction?  I just wanted to make sure everyone is aware!  Please let me know your thoughts.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturm, Fletcher J.
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:24 AM
To:	Evans, Casey
Subject:	Migration

Casey,

Are you guys going to be responsible for moving all relevant power files from the O: and M: drives to UBS?  If so, thanks.  If not, who is?  Thanks,

Fletch


There will be a floor meeting today @ 2:30pm in room 3221a with Louise Kitchen and John Lavorato.

Please plan to attend.

Thanks

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


We could not do that.  On the other hand, if we advocate that it should only apply to those who directly benefitted, and the CPUC adopts that reasoning, we would be shooting our tax argument in the foot.  I think you are right that we need to understand the implications, both financially and contractually, of the options before the Commission.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 5:20 PM
To:	Williams, Robert C.; Mara, Susan; 'mday@gmssr.com'; Steffes, James D.; Wu, Andrew; Smith, Mike
Subject:	RE: $.01 surcharge as "tax"

Thanks.  One other question, which seems like a legal question.  Assume that Enron openly advocates for the PUC to apply the charges to all customers, including ours, understanding that our customers neither benefited from or caused the charges.  If the PUC does it, and we go back to our customers and claim that an indirect tax has been applied, are we in any kind of bind for having pushed for it?  I'm hoping that the answer is no.  Thanks for the info.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 5:11 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; 'mday@gmssr.com'; Steffes, James D.; Wu, Andrew; Smith, Mike
Subject:	FW: $.01 surcharge as "tax"

a legal memo follows

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 9:16 AM
To:	Mellencamp, Lisa; 'jklauber@llgm.com'
Subject:	FW: $.01 surcharge as "tax"

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 5:47 PM
To:	Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	$.01 surcharge as "tax"

A typical clause reads as follows:

" 'Taxes' means any and all new or existing governmental or quasi-governmental taxes, assessments, levies, duties, fees, charges and withholdings of any kind or nature whatsoever and howsoever described, including gross receipts, franchise, sales, use , property, excise, capital, stamp, transfer, employment, occupation, generatiion, privilege, Utility Taxes [separately defined to include "any and all franchise, utility, regulatory, BTU or energy, gross receipts, administrative services, municipality, and utility user taxes and similar taxes and energy resource and municipal land use surcharges and other similar surcharges"], regulatory, BTU, energy, consumption, lease, transaction, license, filing, recording, and activity taxes, levies, duties, fees, charges and withholdings, together with any and all penalties, fines, interest, and additions thereto, but excluding any taxes on the net income of EESI or any affilitates."

Under the contracts the Buyer is usually responsible for taxes "applicable to Power at or after the Delivery Point" (the meter); the Seller is usually responsible for taxes "applicable prior to the Delivery Point."  The surcharge would seem to be applicable "at the Delivery Point."

Support for the argument that the surcharge is not a "tax" under the contracts:

     1.  The CPUC refers to it as a "rate increase"

     2.  It was not imposed by a governmental body (such as a state, county, or municipality)

     3.  When first implemented, all proceeds went to the utilities

     4.  It appears that a portion of the proceeds may continue to go to the utilities

Support for the argument that the surcharge is a "tax" under the contracts:

     1.  Since the "frozen tariff" remains in place it is disingenuous to refer to it as a "rate increase"

     2.  It now appears that the proceeds will go to a governmental entity, the DWR

     3.  The definition of "taxes" under the contract is broad and includes surcharges of all types

     4.  To the extent the $.01 surcharge is to pay for generation for bundled customers, those on direct access receive, if anything, only an indirect benefit, which is similar in effect to a tax and not to a rate increase


Steph,0ls contact pgt and ensure that they are now aware that cnrl is going to et this pipe.  I would suggest you talk to schonne.


CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store
or copy the information in any medium.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Sharon Lewis asked me to contact you about this.  Our client has instructed
us that it is SITA which will enter into the ISDA master agreement.  SITA as
the main company must have a better credit than the company that you
identified.

We cannot agree to a credit support document.

We suggest that you evaluate the credit of SITA and then get back to us.

Kind regards
Susan

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 9/11/2000 20:28:17 >>>
Sharon:  Thanks for your fax and markup of the Schedule dated Sept. 6.
There is a major issue which we need to discuss and that is the
counterparty identity itself.  It appears that you have identified a
DIFFERENT party to the agreement, namely, a limited liability company named
"SITA", which is not the entity which we originally proposed,.  This does
not appear to be the credit which we evaluated.

Also, we insist upon a Credit Support Annex.  As you know, the agreement
contemplates multiple transactions and the posting of collateral is a major
issue, particularly for long-dated pulp deals.

Can you call me tomorrow?  We need to address the major issues upfront.
You can reach me at 713-853-5620.  Thank you.  Sara

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lovells (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and
Boesebeck Droste, practising as Lovells Boesebeck Droste in
some jurisdictions) is an international law firm.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact
the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296 2000.


FROM JULIA MURRAY AND SHEILA TWEED

 The Finance/Origination M&A staff meeting today will be held in EB32C2 at
10:00 a.m.  Please make every effort to attend.

 If attending by teleconference, the call in number is 1-800-851-1769, access
code 577536 and host code 744678.

Thank you,

Julia and Sheila

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3835
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com


Unfortunately, they had nothing to do with EnronOnline.   It was a promo
video we can't use.

They were a company that was subcontracted out to do a promotional video for
EnronOnline.  The people we contracted with is the one Enron uses for all
videos - I believe are suing Hydrogen as the video is unusable.

Kal and legal are chasing.

David Pope
04/07/2000 05:23
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Dave
Samuels/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Adam
Tyrrell/LON/ECT@ECT, Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Macromedia site of the day-reference to EnronOnline

Hi all;

There is some coverage of Enron Online through a highlighted site of the day
on Macromedia.  A company called Hydrogen Interactive is highlighted, and one
of the highlighted claim to fames of Hydrogen is some work that they did for
Enron Online.  This should increase Enron exposure in the techworld as this
macromedia site is well followed.  Links below.

http://www.macromedia.com/showcase/
http://www.h-i.net/


As promised...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 09:08
AM ---------------------------

"Boyd J. Springer" <Boyd_J._Springer@jonesday.com> on 06/13/2000 08:52:58 AM
To: dtucker@bracepatt.com, cdade@bracepatt.com, kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Park and Loan

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

On further review, I don't think we need to challenge the proposed
reference to Parking and Loaning Transactions as being "interruptible".
Although Peoples' GTC does not characterize this service as interruptible,
there are provisions in the GTC re scheduling and priority that render the
service interruptible, e.g. Sect. 6.3.


Andy - can you please forward this email to your book person to change these attached deals from ENA- PGL  to ENA - and the actual counterparty.  Our confirmation guys should send out a confirm to verify these deals.

Tony is continuing to look for additional Harper \ northern border supplies.  I will let you know if he finds anything of interest.


aj peckham
122 w valerio st apt J
santa barbara, CA 93101
chonch222@hotmail.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

aj peckham


---------------------- Forwarded by Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001
11:48 AM ---------------------------

"An La" <an1229@hotmail.com> on 02/28/2001 10:18:07 AM
To: nkhong@ikon.com, Amy_Yueh@valic.com, annamarie.la@marquette.edu,
catherinecao@cs.com, ckcao@aol.com, c_lam902@hotmail.com, qla@houston.rr.com,
chubecca@hotmail.com, darlene107@hotmail.com, dawnzoom@hotmail.com,
PNguyen@tmh.tmc.edu, minhduy@hotmail.com, hanshans@mail.utexas.edu,
hxdinh@hotmail.com, Huy.Dinh@enron.com, Joanie.H.Ngo@enron.com,
kmyla@hotmail.com, klchun@U.Arizona.EDU, koryn2@hotmail.com,
lcampbel@enron.com, megan.la@aspentech.com, knguyen@looksmart.net,
Nicole.La@enron.net, melindango@yahoo.com, Paul_Shah@hotmail.com,
pixie1013@hotmail.com, stevenlee@myself.com, tania_la@hotmail.com,
thunguyen2@hotmail.com, car-khongt@pearland.isd.esc4.net, TLsss@aol.com,
tran96kalila@yahoo.com, trang.dinh@enron.com, tula66@hotmail.com,
Tyler_Jensen@dell.com, yangkit@hotmail.com
cc:

Subject: Fwd: FW: sooo true

>From: "Darling, Sally" <Sally.Darling@chron.com>
>To: "'bart@stanandlou.com'" <bart@stanandlou.com>, "'bcox@beap.com'"
><bcox@beap.com>, "'Diana.Darling@dora.state.co.us'"
><Diana.Darling@dora.state.co.us>, "'Janet.Darling@UCHSC.edu'"
><Janet.Darling@UCHSC.edu>, "'Darlinglaw@aol.com'" <Darlinglaw@aol.com>,
>"'carol.devico@pncbank.com'" <carol.devico@pncbank.com>,
>"'BethGribble@aol.com'" <BethGribble@aol.com>, "'fhharvey@mindspring.com'"
><fhharvey@mindspring.com>, "'an1229@hotmail.com'" <an1229@hotmail.com>,
>"'munksr@rappcollins.com'"  <munksr@rappcollins.com>,
>"'summer_amin@hotmail.com'"  <summer_amin@hotmail.com>
>Subject: FW: sooo true
>Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:00:13 -0600
>
>I don't know if this is funny or really sad.
>
>
>20 SIGNS THAT YOU'VE HAD TOO MUCH OF THE 90'S or 00's
>1.    You try to enter your password on the microwave.
>2.    You haven't played solitaire with real cards for years.
>3.    You have a list of 15 phone numbers to reach your family of 3.
>4.    You e-mail your buddy who works at the desk next to you to ask:
>"Do you wanna go get a Coke?"; and he replies: "Yeah, give me five
>mins"
>5.    You chat several times a day with a stranger from South America, but
>you
>haven't spoken to your next door neighbor yet this year.
>6.    Your reason for not staying in touch with friends is that they are
>not
>
>online.
>7.    Your idea of being organized is multiple colored post-it notes.
>8.    You hear most of your jokes via email rather than in person.
>9.    When you go home after a long day at work you still answer the phone
>in a
>business like manner.
>10.    When you make phone calls from home, you automatically dial a "9" to
>get
>an outside line.
>11.    Your resume is on a diskette in your pocket.
>12.    You really get excited about a 1.7% pay increase.
>13.    You know exactly how many days you've got left until you retire.
>14.    Free food left over from meetings is your staple diet.
>15.    Being sick is defined as you can't walk or you're in the hospital.
>16.    You're already late on the assignment you just received.
>17.    Your relatives and friends describe your job as "works with
>computers".
>18.    You only have makeup for fluorescent lighting.
>
>.......AND THE CLINCHERS ARE..........................
>19.    You read this entire list and you keep nodding and smiling.
>20.    As you read this list, you think about forwarding it to your E-MAIL
>BUDDIES.
>_____________
>
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Bill, for approximately 2 and a half hours on (2:20-5:00am MST)  the scrape
was completely down.  There was no access to it at all.  To maintain the
model and also to properly run the units i maintained 15 minute verbal
contacts with Generation, and updated the scrape based on the numbers that
they gave me.  The numbers appeared good and there were no problems for those
hours.  Apparently this also happened to Holden earlier on 12/23.  I also had
one hour on 12/23 (HE 24) that was not working correctly either.  Thought I
should let you know.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.


Joni, I was wondering if you could find out for me who the Marketer is for Post Rock Gas.  The reason I would like to know is they are the last hold-out shipper as far as signing their extension agreement so that we can send them their Rate Case Refund invoices which are dated September 1, 1999.  I would like to see if a Marketer could call them to see if we could get them to sign so that we could finally get the last of these invoices sent out and cleared from our accounts receivable account.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks,

Raetta


For Dec, we were taking 4679 day from the Egan parking into TGT.  Effective
12/16/2000, we moved the remaining balance to Jan 2001.  I made the following
adjustments to deal 473190,
 took daily withdrawal volumes to 0 effective 12/16 - 12/31
 extended the deal to Jan 2001
 changed 1/1/2001 to 2444
 changed 1/2/2001 - 1/31/2001 to 2414

This might be a little confusing because we also have withdrawals of about
1500 day in Jan.

Also, Egan is showing a different balance than what I have.

I show we should have a total balance of 132,247 (4679 x (31-13)  plus  48025
)  at the end of gas day 12/13/2000.  Egan is showing a balance of 134,302.
This just means that we parked more gas than I thought or we cut back on some
of our withdrawals on the 1st through the 13th.  No big deal, I just want to
make sure we don't leave any gas in parking.


Edmund, thanks for that A&O summary.  Is anyone recommending any change in
the ISDA agreement or schedules?  Hopefully this fact scenario would never
apply to Enron.

Mark


Me

From: Sara Shackleton on 02/21/2001 08:38 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: softs trading

Tanya:  Who in your group handles softs (coffee, sugar, cocoa)?  As you may
know, softs have been approved for OTC financial trading.  We are currently
structuring the softs trading entity(ies) and I think credit should be
involved.  Janine Juggins is handling tax.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


FYI:  EGM has established a fundamentals group that is providing information
on the intranet relating to coal
  and crude markets.

Regards,

Chris Calger

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           01/09/2001 04:17 PM

To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EGM Fundamentals Sites

Here is the info on the EGM sites. IF we can be of any assitance to the
Western team let me know.

Links to the sites are as follows:

Coal - http://egmfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/coal/framework/default.asp

Crude - http://egmfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/crude/framework/default.asp

flash intro - http://egmfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/   *Please note that the
links from this intro are temporarily unavailable so you should use one of
the above links to access the site of your choice.  Feel free to check out to
see the direction we're moving  in  as far as look and feel goes.

Thanks for passing them onto to your team

Jen
34759


All my students are doing so well!  I'm just so proud (sniff, sniff..)!

	Peter Keohane
	08/18/2000 09:15 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Organisational Announcement

Interesting.
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT on 08/18/2000 08:14
AM ---------------------------

Enron Europe Office of the Chairman
08/18/2000 05:44 AM
Please respond to Enron Europe Office of the Chairman
Sent by: Enron Europe General Announcement
To: Enron Legal, Enron Executive Committee, ECT Europe, Enron VPs and MDs 1,
Enron VPs and MDs 2
cc:
Subject: Organisational Announcement

We are pleased to announce that we have appointed Michael Brown as Chief
Operating Officer of Enron Europe.

Michael joined Enron,s London legal department in 1995 and has played a key
role in the success of many of our large commercial ventures since then.  In
July 1999, he was made Enron Europe,s General Counsel.  Replacing Michael in
the General Counsel role will be Mark Evans who joined our legal department
in 1995.

Please join us in congratulating Michael and Mark in their new roles.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	Operational Risk Forum 30C2

Date:		10/1/2001
Time:		11:30 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Got her voice mail.  If I do not here from either person by end of day, I
will let you know.


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 09/14/00 02:49 PM -----

	"Rick Antonoff" <rantonof@cwt.com>
	09/12/00 01:13 PM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com, lmellen@ect.enron.com, lstoler@ect.enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

The story below from today's Daily Bankruptcy Review describes efforts to
"jump-start" bankruptcy legislation in the current Congressional session,
particularly with respect to the financial contracts provisions of the
bill.

(See attached file: Bankruptcy Legislation News.doc)
 - Bankruptcy Legislation News.doc


Find attached the EGM Management Summary and Hot List as of 4/20.  Please
contact me if you have any questions/comments.

Thanks,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Anderson, Patricia
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 8:26 AM
To: Smith, Jeff E.
Subject: 4/20 Mgmt Summary & Hot List

For distribution.

Thanks,
Patricia


So lets see.  You want me to take time out of my busy schedule so that you
can plan a date with some dude?


Tim, that will be fine.  This is a discussion topic that I want your input on
for next year.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
12:12 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Tim Belden                           10/24/2000 11:44 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Delainey Request

Could you shed some light on this for me?  What are you looking for?  I'm
afraid I might lose something as it gets translated from you to Wes to Paula
to me back to Paula to Wes to you.  Perhaps we can discuss while you are here.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 09:46 AM
---------------------------

Paula Harris
10/24/2000 09:38 AM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Delainey Request

Tim,

Dave Delainey is looking for a target customer list, coverage metrics and
goal and objectives for each of your teams:

 West Power Trading
 West Power Mid-Market/Services
 West Power Fundamentals/Structuring

Obviously his proposed breakout of your teams (noted above) is different from
the way we planned them.  For expense purposes, do you want me to add Volume
Management, Real-Time, Pre-Scheduling and Admins to West Power Trading?

Unfortunately, we have a tight deadline because Delainey is looking for this
information by the end of the week.  Do you think you can provide this
information to me by Thursday?  Also, if you could let me know today about
the expense breakout, I can start working on that now.

Thanks, Paula.


Please let me review final changes.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 12:53 PM -----

	"Linda Busk" <Lbusk@hsresources.com>
	06/23/2000 11:17 AM

		 To: <Sara.shackleton@enron.com>, <Susan.Flynn@enron.com>
		 cc: "Jim Duffy" <Jduffy@hsresources.com>, "Jim Kincaid"
<Jkincaid@hsresources.com>, "Marc Peter" <Mpeter@hsresources.com>, "Pam
Smith" <Pasmith@hsresources.com>, "Theo Gazulis" <Theo@hsresources.com>
		 Subject: Comments on ISDA - from Jim Piccone

The documents are fine except that we agreed that the following language
would appear at the end of the sentence in the Cross Default section (part
1(b) of the Schedule to the Master Agreement):

; provided, however, the words ", or becoming capable at such time of being
declared," as they appear in Section 5(a)(vi) are hereby deleted.


Jerry:
Here is the ICF confidentiality agreement that Stuart revised.  Hope this is
to your satisfaction.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Ben


It's literally next door to Woodward.


EnronOptions Announcement

You can now access a web site that describes EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option
Program.  The web site contains some highlights of the EnronOptions Program
as well as some Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).

Access EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program web site by clicking on
http://hrweb.enron.com or by typing the address into your web browser.

We hope you find the site helpful in addressing your questions about the
EnronOptions Program.  If you have any questions, please contact your H.R.
Representative.

There will be several EnronOptions - Your Stock Option Program presentations
throughout the month of January.  Stay tuned to a computer near you for
details.


Sorry for the delay. My assistant Brenda Whitehead will be sending to you
shortly.


I have a doctors appt. first thing and should be in no later than 10:30.  I
will be in the office on Friday.

Carol


Vince:

The application forms, as promised.

Good talking to you and Christie this morning. The project sounds very
exciting and we look forward to working with Enron.

Let me know if there is further info we can provide.

Thanks,
Donna

 - 2001 Field Application Form 1.doc
 - 2001 Field Application Form 2.doc


this looks fine to me.

David W Delainey
12/19/2000 09:06 AM
To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron,
Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael L Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Timothy J
Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: CONFIDENTIAL

Guys, attached you will find a draft org memo that I anticpate going out on
Thursday.  I appreciate your patience.  Please give me any comments ASAP
(only major issues).

Brian/Tim, I assume that we need a communication strategy to HPL employees
before this memo goes out - please advise.

Please keep this note confidential until release.

Regards
Delainey


Sat. night at 7:30 the LJ symphony is presenting "Big Band" night with ice
cream social to follow.  Please send an e-mail to everyone to let them know.
Tickets are $12.50 each and  can be reserved / or purchased at the box office
at the art center during the day or after 1:00 pm on Sat.  I have one extra
ticket if any one is interested.  Attire is nice casual.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Tim, I thought I would send you a copy of the East Mid-Market QBR to give you
a view on what Presto/Baughman are doing.  The West historically has been far
better than the East in covering the market and generating mid market
deals/services.  I look forward to our discussion in Portland next week.  I
would like to get a perspective on organization, market approach, deal flow,
resources, products and coverage for the Mid-Market group at that meeting.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000
11:00 AM ---------------------------
   Mary Kay Moore                08/18/2000 10:55 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frank/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: East Mid-Market _ QBR

Per Mark Frank's request here is a copy of the East Mid-Market QBR

Thanks
Mary Kay


How's everything going?  Are you enjoying yourself?  How's the new position?
How's the family?

Kevin


I am teaching a class at Rice and one of my very bright students sent her
resume
in response to this posting. Do you know who posted this job?

Vince Kaminski

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001
05:27 PM ---------------------------

"Helen Demianenko" <demianen@hydrant.ruf.rice.edu> on 04/24/2001 02:11:05 PM
Please respond to <demianen@rice.edu>
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Job posting

Dear Vince,

Thanks for talking to me this morning about the Sr. Risk Analyst position.
Here is where you can find the job description for that position:

http://www2.enron.com/jobs/cgi-bin/get_details.pl?id=0000108729&b=4x

Also, I have cut and pasted it down below, just in case.

I appreciate your assistance in this matter and will start working on my
cover letter right away.
I would also like to talk to somebody to get a better feel for the position
(Is this really an MBA level position and how much of the in-depth learning
opportunities for the derivatives market does it entail?)

Sincerely,

Helen Demianenko

P.S. I have attached my resume (one more time).

SR RISK ANALYST
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: Primary accountability for managing the ETS Risk Book
structure and processes from a pipeline (front office) perspective. Work
within current NNG and TW Marketing organizations to effectively integrate
risk books into daily marketing and structured product activities. Provide
feedback to management regarding overall and specific risk positions.
Provide support for consistent and accurate deals entry/reporting for stand
alone risk management system. Create ad-hoc reports to assist management in
risk analysis. Responsible for managing and providing enhancements to the
Capacity Books :? Maintain functionality and provide leadership for new
functionality from a users perspective. Provide support and direction for
integration of Capacity Books and Revenue Management Project.Support Revenue
Management Team
ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS: BA/BS in Finance or Accounting (MBA preferred).
Minimum of two years financial instruments experience. Excellent
quantitative/analytic and systems skills. Knowledge of commodity risk book
concepts. Understanding of physical natural gas market, interstate
transportation and financial derivatives. Ability to interface with
structuring/marketing groups in order to define business requirements.
Ability to provide leadership for business and system processes. Excellent
communication skills with an ability to communicate across organization with
varied skill sets and ideas. Must be self-motivated with a high level of
energy

PREFERRED SKILLS: NA.

SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS: This job functions in a team-oriented, fast-paced
environment with multiple concurrent assignments and constantly changing
priorities.

CONTACT: Responses will be accepted through May 3, 2001. Respond to Enron
Corp., Human Resources 235, P O Box 3330, Omaha, NE 68103-0330 or e-mail:
dea.crum@enron.com as a .doc or .txt attachment. Please include this
requisition number.

Job ID  0000108729
Department  RISK MANAGEMENT & REPORTI
Company  ENRON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
ENRON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
Location  HOUSTON, TX
Type
Posting date 19-APR-01

 - Helen_D_resume.doc


that is amazing


Here we go!!!!

My Purchases:

8/9	To BPA-EPMI(PWX) 51 mw should be priced at 70.72 and not 70.22  Total= $433,054.06
8/17  Looks like your missing the park/lending deal [150 peak @41.21; 100 off @ 31.39] Total=$269,516.56
8/18  Same as the 17th. Total= 267,475.56

Once these are fixed I'm good on the purchase side.  Will be working on my sales to you next!

thanks

ds

-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Snyder [mailto:Anne_Snyder@pgn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: August detail

Diana, here is my August detail.
Anne


Frank -

Attached you will find copies of the ETA, Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for
Clickpaper.  I have attached a revised version and clean version. Overall, my
comments were extremely limited as these documents are in good shape.

Please let me know if you should need anything further.

Please note that I have placed a 5/01 notation in the footer of both the
privacy policy and the ETA so that we can track the version, since there was
no indication of how else to track them.  If you need to change this, please
remember to delete this reference.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

	Frank L Davis/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/15/2001 02:41 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: EOL & Clickpaper Legal Docs

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Davis, Frank L.
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Taylor, Mark
Subject: EOL & Clickpaper Legal Docs

Mark,

Attached below are the legal documents for EOL and Clickpaper.  I'll come to
your office to discuss possible issues.

Thanks!

Frank
x37235


At the request of Darren Vanek in Credit, we have done some preliminary due
diligence regarding the ability of The Public Service Company of New Mexico
to enter into financial transactions.  Based on our conversations with them
and review of their Board Resolution, it appears:

1.  They are an investor owned utility, not a governmental entity
2.  Their Board Resolution ONLY approves electricity futures, options or
swaps, and gas or oil futures, options or swaps.
3.  THEY CANNOT ENTER INTO FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS OVER 18 MONTHS.  It is
imperative that anyone trading with this counterparty be made aware of this
restriction

Please call me if you have any questions.


Diane:

Attached is a blackline for the first deal (but you should use the language
for both deals).  Let me know if you have any questions.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	04/05/2001 10:19 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NUI Energy Brokers

Here's the generated confirmations for you to insert your
language:


Diane,

I would wait on sending the confirms because we are currently negotiating
with NUI on the provisions that Sara added.  NUI has told us that those
provisions are unacceptable in the physical deal so I assume they will be
unacceptable in the financial deal.  Hopefully, this issue will be resolved
tomorrow.  I will let you know the outcome.

Stacy

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	04/05/2001 04:48 PM

		 To: Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NUI Energy

Mark,

Do you guys want to look at these confirms before they go
out?  I've incorporated the language Sara provided.......

-Diane


Jeff, I just wanted to follow up on the military adventure travel group
information I sent you a few weeks ago.  If you are still interested in going
with your YPO group please do not hesitate to ask.

Regards,

Eddie Sera
Enron Broadband Services Inc.
Event Specialist

PH:      713 853-0480
CELL:  713 562-7614
FAX:    713 646-8887
eddie_sera@enron.net
www.enron.net

----- Forwarded by Eduardo Sera/Enron Communications on 03/12/01 04:19 PM
-----

	Eddie Sera
	Sent by: Eduardo Sera
	02/07/01 10:04 AM

		 To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Costa Rica Military Adventure group

Jeff, attached is a link to the web site for Specops.  They are the U.S.
Special Forces group that does specialized adventure travel that we discussed
on Sunday.  I went ahead and printed most of the information on the website
for your convenience and gave it to Sherri to give to you.  I hope this helps
you out with your trip planning.  If you would like me to help you out with
this trip please do not hesitate to ask.

http://www.specops.com/

Regards,

Eddie Sera
Enron Broadband Services Inc.
Event Specialist

PH:      713 853-0480
CELL:  713 562-7614
FAX:    713 646-8887
eddie_sera@enron.net
www.enron.net


While the conditions relating to approval of EdF's merger with EnBW are not
strong enough for Enron (they never are!), I did want to call to your
attention the concessions/remedies the European Commission Merger Task Force
will require of EdF, which is SOLELY, in my view, attributable to the efforts
of Enron, and in particular efforts lead by Peter Styles.  You will see below
that EdF must make available, on a "virtual" (hence "VPP") basis capacity in
some of its facilities (something I think they once accused us of "dreaming"
about when we asked for it).  It may not make for a fully vibrant and
competitive market, but it is a start which could not have been made without
this effort.   let Peter or me know if you need more.   thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 07/02/2001
16:27 ---------------------------

Nailia Dindarova
07/02/2001 15:41
To: Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Viviana Florio/FRA/ECT@ECT, Bruno
Gaillard/EU/Enron@Enron, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: EdF/EnBW decision

Please see attached the Commission's press release (EN, FR and DE). We need
to look into the full text of the decision (not yet available in the Official
Journal) to judge any changes to the terms and conditions of VPP auction in
reflection of our comments/criticism.

So far the news are:

EdF makes available 6,000 MW (instead of 5,000!) to competitors, out of which
5,000MW are released via VPP, 1,000 through PPAs. This is meant to constitute
30% of eligible market.
This undertaking is limited to 5 years - subject to Commission's review upon
expiration - possibility of prolongation if compet. market will not have
evolved
EdF renounces its voting rights in CNR + withdrwa representatives in the
Board of CNR + EdF won't be involved in CNR's commercial policy and market
conduct (until we see detailed conditions difficult to judge whether any
additional restrictions have been added since we saw the text of this
undertaking alst time)
EnBW divests its shareholding in WATT (we have to see whether any
ring-fencing conditions were added)

Let's discuss later.


Yes, thank you so much.  It is displayed proudly in my  office.  It is sooo
cute!

Linda J Noske@ECT
10/12/2000 09:54 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: IMPORTANT MEETING!!!!

YOU DID GET YOUR BOWLING PIN RIGHT????

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	12/10/00 09:38 AM

		 To: Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: IMPORTANT MEETING!!!!

I didn't know he was 50!!!

Linda J Noske@ECT
10/12/2000 09:37 AM
To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L
Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jenny
Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Twanda
Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger
Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin
W Penkwitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jason Peters/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth
White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony
Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Angie Buis/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: IMPORTANT MEETING!!!!

Please join us TODAY, October 12th, in EB38C1 at 1:00 p.m. to celebrate Ed
Hearn's Birthday.  It's the BIG ONE  : )))))))))))))))))))))

PASS IT ON.

If possible, please try to be in the conference room before 1:15 p.m.

THIS IS A SECRET!!!!!


FYI...........
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001
07:49 AM ---------------------------
From: Mechelle Atwood/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 03:24 PM
To: Robert L Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wes Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate, "john.j.boudreaux@andersen.com"
<'john.j.boudreaux@andersen.com'>@SMTP@enronXgate,
"kate.e.agnew@us.andersen.com"
<'kate.e.agnew@us.andersen.com'>@SMTP@enronXgate, Nicole
Mendez/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Gas Trading Audit Notification

The Gas Trading Audit is scheduled to begin May 11, 2001 and is expected to
take approximately two to three months to complete.  The audit will be
executed by Arthur Andersen and led by Kate Agnew.

We will schedule an opening meeting with you the week of May 7, 2001 to
discuss audit scope and any concerns or suggestions you may have.

The objective of the audit will be to determine whether procedures and
controls exercised over activities are adequate and operating effectively.

Results of the audit will be discussed with you and other appropriate
personnel both during the audit and at the audit closing meeting.

We will endeavor to conduct this audit in a manner that will minimize
interruption of your normal business activities and we look forward to
working with you and your personnel. Please call me at x5-4554 if have any
questions.

Mechelle Atwood
Director, Enron Assurance Services
Enron Wholesale Services
713.345.4554; Location:  EB2383
Mechelle.Atwood@enron.com


There will be two presentations tomorrow from UBS commencing at 2:30 p.m. (CST).  These will be held in ECS 06980 and the conference dial-in numbers are listed below.

				2:30 p.m.	Bill Glass & Bill Bradford - Credit
				3:00 p.m.	Alex Fusco - New Business Guidelines

Dial-in #		800.486.2726
Host code	353763 (Louise)
Participant	547763

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor
Assistant to Greg Whalley
713.853.1935 office
713.853.1838 fax
713.854.3056 mobile


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/08/2000 08:59 AM -----

	"Tetrault, Charles D." <ctetrault@velaw.com>
	10/07/2000 04:22 PM

		 To: "Tetrault, Charles D." <ctetrault@velaw.com>
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Hunsaker, Barry (EOG Resources)"
<barry_hunsaker@eogresources.com>, "Hoyle, Andy (E-mail)"
<Andrew_Hoyle@eogresources.com>, "'Williams, Steven P.'"
<Steve_Williams@eogresources.com>
		 Subject: DOJ - Memo to File - Range of Market Values

Pearson's June 9, 2000 letter questions why $.10 or $.11 were deducted from
the Transco and Koch indices in connection with the sale of Mobile Bay Block
870 gas.

We responded in detail on October 3.  In addition to those answers, we
should keep in mind that market value cannot necessarily be calculated with
mathematical precision.  Market value is often described in terms of a
range.  Indeed, the Inside FERC's Gas Market Reports publishes not only an
index price, but also a range of prices for each pipeline pricing point.

In looking at the applicable indices for those two pipelines for some of the
sample months, it is clear that, if $.10 or $.11 were deducted from the
index price, then the resulting price would still be in the range as
published by Inside FERC.

For example, in December 1996, the Transco Zone 3 index price was $3.82.
The published range was $3.38 to $3.95.  So adjusting the index by 10 cents
still keeps you well within the range.

Similarly, for the 1996 Koch So. La. index.  The index price was $3.82.  The
range was $3.55 to $3.94.  Again, an 11 cent adjustment is still well within
the range.

A quick review of other months shows that sometimes the range was narrower,
and the adjustments would take you outside the range.  Nonetheless, we
should keep this background information in mind in case Justice continues to
pursue this point.

Charles D. Tetrault
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1455 Pennsylvania Ave. N. W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
ctetrault@velaw.com
202.639.6551 [voice]
202.639.6604 [fax]

 - att1.unk


ditto credit.

Leslie

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Tana
Sent: Tue 9/25/2001 8:34 PM
To: Aronowitz, Alan; Calo, Andrea; Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS); Gaffney, Chris; Hansen, Leslie; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Johnston, Greg; Keohane, Peter; Korkmas, Deb; McBride, Jane; Minns, David; Nettelton, Marcus; Powell, Mark; Rossi, Robbi; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John
Cc:
Subject: FW: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 09-25-01

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:   Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:27 PM
To:     Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Reves, Brant; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Arnold, Thu Pham; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Thakkar, Ami; Piotrowski, Joseph; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Curry, Ken

Subject:        EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 09-25-01

Please see attached.

<<EOL 09-25-01.xls>>
Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


As detailed in the attached FERC notice, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved FERC's Information Collection Request for "Reporting of Natural Gas Sales to the California Market" through the six-month emergency period that will expire on 1/31/02.  (Emergency reporting requirements are automatically approved for six months under the OMB regulations.)  However, it gave FERC several conditions that would have to be met before the reporting requirements could be extended.

OMB has advised FERC that, if it decides to request renewal of the Information Collection Request after that date, it must address certain issues as part of its supporting statement (more specifically, "include an explicit discussion").  As you may remember, in addition to requesting rehearing of the FERC order, ENA and EES submitted comments to OMB regarding our problems with FERC's estimate of the burden on affected companies of the proposed collection of information.  We pointed out that we do not manage our business in the manner contemplated by the reporting requirements, much less keep our records in that manner.  We manage our business on an aggregated basis, and complying with the requirements will require us to implement significant manual review and analysis to arbitrarily define the components of a sale.  We stated that we might even have to hire full-time staff to dedicate to the task.

The issues that we raised in our comments are the same ones that OMB requires FERC to address if they submit a request for approval to extend the reporting requirements past 1/31/02.  (FERC indicated in its July order that it intended to extend the reporting requirement through 9/30/02 to coincide with the end date of its mitigation plan.)  OMB questioned the practical utility of requiring disaggregated data when "commenters" reported that they did not maintain the data in a way that allowed them to report it that way.  OMB expressed concern that the data collection would require significant data manipulation in order to respond, and the resulting disaggregation would likely be artificial.  OMB also required FERC to evaluate its burden estimates after "consulting with respondents", and it must provide a list of the names, affiliates, and phone numbers of the respondents it contacted.

FERC has not yet issued an order on our rehearing request.  While we would not expect them to withdraw the reporting requirements entirely, it may be that the OMB action will affect their final decision.  At the least, it sends a signal!


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 07/07/2000
09:00 AM ---------------------------

Christine Stokes
07/06/2000 01:04 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Southwest Gas Discount Amendment Changes

Recent negotiations with Southwest Gas Corporation have resulting in the
deletion of two provisions  contained in the original Southwest Gas
Corporation discount letter with was routed for Officer Approval.  Several
minor "sentence structure" changes requested by Southwest Gas have also been
included.

Please review the revised Discount Letter and forward any comments
immediately to either Lorraine Lindberg (x35403) or Susan Scott (x30596).
The following summarizes the changes to the original discount letter:

1.  Deletion of paragraph which waives ROFR rights.    This paragraph is not
necessary due to FERC Order 637 rule which states that the shipper's tariff
right to ROFR for contracts of one year or longer does not apply to
discounted transportation contracts, only max rate contracts.

2.  Deletion of Paragraph which states Transwestern will retain any capacity
release revenues which Shipper may acquire from releasing capacity at rates
above the Discount Rate provided by Transwestern to Shipper.

Please note that the revised discount letter does retain the original intent
of providing Southwest Gas a 10 year discount rate for seasonal (November
through March period) capacity from Transwestern's East of Thoreau (EOT) Area
to the Southwest Gas Interconnect located in the East of California Area.
The $.10/Dth/d transportation rate shall increase annually by $.005/Dth/d for
the term of the agreement.  Alternate receipt points rights are in the EOT
Area as with as within the primary path of the contract.  Southwest Gas may
also utilize the Bloomfield Compressor on an alternate basis.


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001
02:01 PM ---------------------------

MPierce446@aol.com on 05/08/2001 01:37:49 PM
To: piercem@tklaw.com, BGrove2821@aol.com, mblair@robs.org, dborn@llgm.com,
cmborn@texaschildrenshospital.org, jillbr@flash.net, Gfishrn@aol.com,
kog@alumni.rice.edu, irvine@pdq.net, larry.knapp@usaa.com,
JenniferBKnapp@aol.com, lmazzone@robs.org, msmiller@eudoramail.com,
KCN40@aol.com, spereir@ect.enron.com, Greektreat@aol.com, j1203@flash.net,
NRStroud@shellus.com, Lkay737@aol.com, ahgrove@compaq.net, MPierce446@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Math Explorations

Dear Class Parents,

The class will have their last Math Explorations class this Friday from 10
until 11. ?Two of the volunteers are unable to be there so we need two
substitutes. ?Is anyone interested??It is fun and no preparation is
necessary. ?It is a great way to get to know your child's classmates and to
see how your child interacts with the class.

Email me or call me asap, please. ?My phone number is 713-661-6422.

Thanks,

Margaret Pierce


Attached is the revised regulatory matrix for Transwestern's Red Rock Expansion project reflecting the notice that tree clearing activities commenced on October 11, 2001 at Station 2.    Remaining notifications include:

start of construction at remaining stations (within 10 days of start date)
end of construction and in-service date (within 10 days)
actual costs (within 6 months after facilities constructed)
noise survey at Stations 3 & 4 (within 60 days after in-service), and
any additional changes in construction and/or mitigation procedures  (WOULD REQUIRE A DIRECTOR'S LETTER BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGE)

Any questions, let me know.  Thanks for your help.  Donna


no. i didn't know that.  i guess it will be like def comedy jam

Bryan Hull
03/30/2001 01:00 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Do you know that there are no opening comedians before Dave?  Just a DJ.


How does Friday sound for our chicago compressor \ interconnection meeting?
Can you guys arrange a meeting room and lining-up one of ENA's compression
experts?  Tim will be ready to discuss his project and expected costs.  Let
us know what other information we should be prepared to discuss.

Richard


Hi Brian,

Could you email me the MOU we are terminating?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/05/2000 10:06
AM ---------------------------

jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com on 06/02/2000 07:10:57 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com, william.danaher@ps.ge.com
cc: Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, patricia.gonzalez@ps.ge.com

Subject: RE: Letter agreement

Kay,
Here is a version of a "letter agreement" we came up with (2 pages).
Perhaps we can use the same company ID's that we are using in the contracts
themselves.  I will double check with our legal/tax/finance folks [Bill, can
you comment on this?]
Regards,
Jeff Smith

 <<Termination MOU.doc>>

-----Original Message-----
From:   Smith, Jeffrey E (PS, CommOps)
Sent:   Friday, June 02, 2000 6:46 PM
To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com; jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com
Cc:   Brian.D.Barto@enron.com
Subject:   RE: Letter agreement

Kay,
I'm still in the office.  I assume you need the addresses of the parties
involved with the MOU to include in the "letter agreement".  (So the GE
entity named therein can send the money back to the Enron entity named
therein.)
I do not have access to that document at this time.  I can get access on
Monday.  If you have other names and addresses in mind, let me know.
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent:   Friday, June 02, 2000 5:24 PM
To:   jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com
Cc:   Brian.D.Barto@enron.com
Subject:   Letter agreement

Hi Jeff,

I'm preparing the letter agreement regarding payment.  Can you help me with
the name and address to use?

Thanks,

Kay


Attached are the draft termsheets, substantially in the form that Ranabir
presented to Peoples, being used in connection with the Manlove transaction.
As you can see, I received them on Wednesday.  I am sure there is an attorney
in ENA who would gladly spend time reviewing gas storage docs.  We need to
talk re: staffing etc. early next week.  Give me a call.

----- Forwarded by Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000 01:47 PM -----

	Ranabir Dutt@ENRON
	10/11/2000 02:09 PM

		 To: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gregg Penman@ECT, Katie
Stowers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Ondreko@ECT, Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Term sheets for Manlove

Attached are the draft term sheets that we propose to discuss with the
working group of Peoples.

Ranabir


Market Participants:

Please assure that this Notification is forwarded to your respective
Operating Departments ---

Notification of Operating Procedure Update

*	The following new or revised ISO Operating Procedures have been
implemented and are posted for reference on the ISO Website.

ISO Operating Procedure posted:  T-102 COI-PDCI North of John Day Nomogram
Version: 3.8
Effective Date: 11/7/01
Summary of changes: Quarterly Updates

*	Please find them at
http://www1.caiso.com/thegrid/operations/opsdoc/index.html under the
appropriate Operating Procedure section heading.

If you have any questions, please e-mail the 'Procedure Control Desk'
mailbox [mailto:procctrldesk@caiso.com] and we will respond as soon as
possible.

Thank-You,

Operations Support and Training

Client Relations Communications.0921
CRCommunications@caiso.com


I got this from elizabeth.  IF you really want to change the date let me
know, it is scheduled for next Friday.  When the move occurs, we can take the
PC on palmer's new desk and move it to mick's old desk.  I will move that.
PL
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
09:44 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Elizabeth Soto                           02/06/2001 09:34 AM

To: Move-Team/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Churn for M. Walters and S. Palmer


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000
01:47 PM ---------------------------

From:  Sheri Thomas
  06/29/2000 12:42 PM

To: MRossen@INTERGEN.com, dgiron1@pdq.net, sherzog@ridgways.com,
loroks@yahoo.com, jennifer_lamprecht@oxy.com, dawn.mcdonald@csfb.com,
dmcnutt@ghg.net, denise@medsamerica.com, rochelle@waterengineers.com,
swarre02@coair.com, hollyw@email.msn.com, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C
Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott.Crowell@oracle.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Grandma Wassup

hey ladies - this could be us in 30 years!
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000 12:39
PM ---------------------------

From:  Cecilia Olvera
    06/28/2000 04:08 PM

To: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Grandma Wassup

Funny!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000
04:07 PM ---------------------------

Alex Saldana
06/28/2000 02:33 PM
To: "Sonya Rodriguez" <sonyardz@hotmail.com> @ ENRON, Nere <nere@myrex.com>,
"marissa merino" <mr0401@hotmail.com>, "Marivel Mercado"
<MMercado@MarathonOil.com> @ ENRON, "Martha Real" <Marthar@mfslcpa.com>,
"Maria Segura" <Marias@mfslcpa.com>, juan lopez <lopey69@yahoo.com> @ ENRON,
Adriana Saldana <asaldana@UH.EDU>, "alicia" <alara@enhancedlaser.com>, "Leal,
Dinorah" <LealD@national-citymortgage.com>, "Jerez, Ernest"
<Ernest.Jerez@usa.xerox.com>, Vanilapuf@aol.com, SMedina@chartertitle.com,
csal314042@aol.com, Stacie.Saldivar@chron.com, "Sandra Martinez"
<MARTINEZ_S@hccs.cc.tx.us>, Cecilia.Olvera@enron.com, sm45818@aol.com, Andrea
R Guillen/HOU/ECT, DKovasovic@aol.com, MBalderas@chartertitle.com,
Heather.Choate@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Grandma Wassup

---------------------- Forwarded by Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 02:36
PM ---------------------------

>
>
>  <<grandma-wassup.mpg>>

 - grandma-wassup.mpg


Sherry,

I haven't forgetten about the numbers on the pictures I will send them to you tommorow. A guy in my office was wondering if you can order Stickley furniture through you buying group. Can you let me know if you get a second.

Thanx

Chris


How does 3 pm look ?

Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
02/06/2001 10:25 AM
To: Harry Arora/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: TSS Presentation

I am open after 2:00 Pm. Let me know when I can come by your office.

Thanks!

Leonardo

Harry Arora@ECT
02/05/2001 06:34 PM
To: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: TSS Presentation

Leonardo

Lets do one more iteration some time tomorrow.  These are looking pretty
goood.

Harry


I believe I have compared the ENA Aug 29 version to the VEPCO Aug 21 version
of the Capacity and Energy Contract.  I'm no expert at CompareRite, but I
believe it worked.

Here goes:

Let me know if you have any trouble opening this document.

Kay