Hi Brent,
 This is from Jane and she wants comments as soon as possible. This is right
down your alley. Hope you are doing well. Let me how it turns out.

Yao
---------------------- Forwarded by Yao Apasu/HOU/ECT on 11/03/98 11:07 AM
---------------------------
From: "Amr Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 11/03/98
09:27 AM
To: Yao Apasu@ECT
cc: "Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT" AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
Subject: Argentina - Annex 32

Yau: The changes are in section 7 of annex 32.  I do appreciate your help and
looking forward for any comments.  Thank you.  AI

(See attached file: ZN-Anexo32c.doc)
 - ZN-Anexo32c.doc


Please see attached.  Also, I will be out of the office on Monday, April 9.
Please contact Tom Moran for any EOL-related issues; thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/19/2000 01:21
PM ---------------------------

Clayton Vernon@ENRON
02/17/2000 11:23 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Natasha-

now, now, now-

you're a 38 year-old man, and you're talking about serious issues- marriage
and a family. hey, i'm the biggest kid you'll ever meet, but we're talking
about my wife's best friend here, so pretend like she's my sister or
something.

claybus


Nancy,

Please call me about this.

Thank you,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/23/2000 09:36
AM ---------------------------

Heather Kroll@ECT
06/22/2000 03:56 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Term Sheet for City of Rocky Mount

Kay,

Attached below is a draft term sheet for our discussion tomorrow re: City of
Rocky Mount and the non-binding LOI we need to draft and send to them.

Let's talk about it tomorrow.

Heather


Accurate and sobering.  I've made two small comments just as an fyi.

	<Suzanne_Nimocks@mckinsey.com>
	01/12/2001 09:18 AM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Urgent;  California Article

Here is a draft of the article we discussed.  It is rather benign - but I
would appreciate it if you would take a look.  Let me know if you have any
reaction.
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Nimocks/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY on 01/12/2001
09:17 AM -----

                    Bob Edwards
                    01/11/2001           To:     Les
                    04:28 PM
Silverman/DCO/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY,
                                         John
Bookout/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY,
                                         Tim
Bleakley/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY,
                                         Rob
Latoff/CLE/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY,
                                         Matt
Rogers/SFO/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY,
                                         Jim
Robb/SFO/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY, Andy

Steinhubl/LAN/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY,
                                         Suzanne

Nimocks/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY
                                         cc:     Gerrit van

Geyn/TOR/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@Mckinsey, Thomas
                                         Seitz, Jud

Morrison/HOU/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY,
                                         Scott Nyquist, Susan

Lund/DCO/NorthAmerica/MCKINSEY@MCKINSEY
                                         Subject:     Urgent;  California
Article

Attached is an article that we have drafted with the help of a McK
Quarterly editor.   We have set up a call for tomorrow at 10:00  (CST) in
order to talk through the article and the implications to our clients.  We
have received very good and constructive comments from many of you which we
have tried to incorporate (as much as a 750 word limit would allow).  We
believe we have a shot at a Monday op-ed piece in the WSJ if we send this
out Friday.  The events of today highlight the timeliness of this issue.
Looking forward to talking to you tomorrow.

Bob

 (See attached file: CalMarket-op-ed.doc)

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
 - CalMarket-op-ed.doc


Meeting will be at 10:30 in 3125!  See you there.
Ben


Jeff,

Are you up-to-speed on this one?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 02:37
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
03/06/2001 09:27 AM
To: Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Hi Marchris,

I'm in ENA Legal, and I'm looking for the right person to discuss this with.
Christi Nicholay suggested I get you involved.  Please give me a call at 713
345 7566 to discuss.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 09:29
AM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
03/05/2001 10:48 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

OK. This guy's a lawyer by training, but we're hiring him as a lobbyist.
Roger was previously looking into this, and proposed our standard form
agreement. Steve and I were wondering if we could work off of Tripp Scott's
proposed form, considering that he will not be representing us as our counsel.

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Ben

Kay Mann@ENRON
03/04/2001 02:27 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Ben,

What are these folks supposed to do for Enron?  I had heard a rumor that we
were looking to hire someone to lobby for us on a success fee basis.  Is this
the same deal?  I know on the international side there were hoops to jump
through before such an engagement could be signed off on.  I'll have to check
to see what the drill is on this side of the street.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           02/28/2001 12:18 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

Per my earlier e-mail, attached is Tripp Scott's form.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 12:17 PM
---------------------------

Steven Krimsky@ENRON
02/28/2001 09:11 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed, Roger has no problem engaging Tripp Scott.  He does want to use
Enron's standard 9 page engagement letter in lieu of the attached 2 pager
received from Tripp Scott.  Is this necessary - any thoughts?

Steve

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
09:08 AM ---------------------------

Steven Krimsky
02/16/2001 03:44 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog@ECT, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Tripp Scott Proposed Terms of Engagement

As discussed in Fort Pierce, Tripp Scott is that insurance policy I've been
looking for to help secure the commission vote in Pompano.  Tripp Scott will
also assist us in our door knock campaign in the County & Tallahassee.
Pozzuoli is a mover & shaker and is on a first name basis with Jeb Bush -  he
was the Chairman for the Bush/Cheny Broward County re-count.

Bill Keith & Debbie Orshefsky highly recommends the engagement.

Lets discuss Tuesday.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron on 02/16/2001
03:38 PM ---------------------------

"Edward J. Pozzuoli (Paulette R Segal)" <PRS@trippscott.usa.com> on
02/14/2001 01:56:42 PM
To: steven.krimsky@enron.com
cc: TSCS.TSCS-1.ejp@mail4.allegro.net

Subject: Proposed Terms of Engagement

It was a pleasure meeting with you and Debbie on Monday afternoon.  Per our
discussion, enclosed is Tripp Scott's proposed terms of engagement as well as
an abbreviated description of the firm and its key directors.

I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Ed
 - 239299.WPD
 - 239243.WPD


Good Morning,

Mike Purcell has accepted a position in the Volume Management group and will
be joining that team effective April 23rd.

Mike has worked on the Preschedule desk for over a year scheduling the
Northwest, and has done a fine job representing Enron to our counterparties.
His technical ability and grace under pressure will be missed as we roll into
the summer months!

Please join me in wishing Mike well in his new position.

Cara


Vince, scanned through.  Looks like a good start.

Thanks

John Henderson

----- Forwarded by John Henderson/HOU/NewPower on 02/16/2001 03:32 PM -----

	Vince J Kaminski@ECT
	02/16/2001 09:56 AM

		 To: John Henderson/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wharton Tm #3 Presentation

John,

Did you have a chance to take a look at his presentation?

Any comments?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
09:55 AM ---------------------------

"Cummins, Marc" <marcjc@wharton.upenn.edu> on 02/15/2001 01:36:16 PM
To: "'Christie.Patrick@enron.com'" <Christie.Patrick@enron.com>,
Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, Melinda.McCarty@enron.com, "'Li.Sun@enron.com'"
<Li.Sun@enron.com>, "'john.henderson@newpower.com'"
<john.henderson@newpower.com>
cc: "Thorne, Heather" <hethorne@wharton.upenn.edu>, "DeGiacinto, Clayton"
<degiacic@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Lessar, Stephen"  <lessars@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"Vittal, Maheshram"  <mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Bassal, Omar"
<bassalo@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Feerick, Dennis" <dennisf@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"Cummins, Marc"  <marcjc@wharton.upenn.edu>, "'thomas@wharton.upenn.edu'"
<thomas@wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: Wharton Tm #3 Presentation

Vince and Christie,

Here are the read ahead slides for today's teleconference.  Also attached is
the first draft of our Conjoint Analysis survey.  We'll see you this
afternoon.

 <<Enron Pres #3.ppt>>  <<NewPower Conjoint.doc>>

Sincerely,

Team 3

 - Enron Pres #3.ppt
 - NewPower Conjoint.doc


I spoke to Howard Volz at CT Corporation today, and he said he sent the
renewal to DAPSA in November (their renewal date is Feb. 1 of each year) and
hasn't heard from them.  I asked him to refax the renewal notice to them.  He
said CT will not revoke the consent for about 5-6 more weeks, so we've got
some time to resolve this.  I'll keep you posted.


Enerfax Daily
NORTH AMERICA'S FREE POWER AND GAS INFORMATION SOURCE
              Thursday, January 10 2002 No. 902
Visit: http://www.enerfax.com/ or for Oil Prices & News
http://www.enerfaxgold.com/
PHYSICAL NATURAL GAS PRICES
Gulf/Eastern Region
| Agua Dulce              | 2.17  |
| ANR SE                  | 2.25  |
| Carthage TG             | 2.25  |
| Chicago Citygate        | 2.19  |
| Columbia Gulf Onshore   | 2.28  |
| Dominion South Point    | 2.38  |
| Henry Hub               | 2.31  |
| Houston Ship Channel    | 2.30  |
| Katy Hub                | 2.25  |
| NGPL LA Pool            | 2.18  |
| NGPL - Midcontinent     | 2.08  |
| NGPL STX                | 2.15  |
| NGPL TX/OK              | 2.16  |
| NNG Demarc.             | 2.12  |
| Niagara                 | 2.48  |
| Sonat Tier 1            | 2.26  |
| TCO IPP Pool            | 2.38  |
| Tetco ELa               | 2.30  |
| Tetco M-3               | 2.61  |
| Tetco STX               | 2.18  |
| TGP Zone 0              | 2.19  |
| TGP Zone 1 (500 Leg)    | 2.26  |
| TGT Zone SL             | 2.28  |
| New York Citygate       | 2.67  |
| Transco Station 65      | 2.37  |
| Transco Zone 6 (NY)     | 2.67  |
| Trunk ELa               | 2.22  |
| Western Region
| California Border       | 2.15  |
| El Paso Keystone        | 2.03  |
| El Paso San Juan-Blanco | 2.00  |
| Waha Hub                | 2.10  |
| Canadian/Rockies Region
| Nova/Aeco (C$/gig)      | 2.89  |
| Dawn Hub/Union          | 2.27  |
| Northwest Stanfield     | 2.03  |
| Wyoming Pool            | 1.92  |
| Opal/Kern River         | 1.94  |
| PGT-Malin               | 2.09  |
| Sumas                   | 2.01  |
          Flow Date 01/10
-------------------------------------------------------------

NATURAL GAS FUTURES
Henry Hub
12 Month Strip  2.5410 -0.0438
18 Month Strip  2.6860 -0.0429
| Month | High  |  Low  | Close | Change |
| FEB   | 2.270 | 2.140 | 2.228 | -0.053 |
| MAR   | 2.260 | 2.150 | 2.232 | -0.053 |
| APR   | 2.270 | 2.245 | 2.266 | -0.024 |
| MAY   | 2.360 | 2.271 | 2.332 | -0.042 |
| JUN   | 2.450 | 2.320 | 2.402 | -0.040 |
| JUL   | 2.475 | 2.410 | 2.467 | -0.038 |
| AUG   | 2.525 | 2.465 | 2.517 | -0.038 |
| SEP   | 2.580 | 2.485 | 2.531 | -0.041 |
| OCT   | 2.605 | 2.515 | 2.566 | -0.041 |
| NOV   | 2.810 | 2.750 | 2.794 | -0.043 |
| DEC   | 3.050 | 2.975 | 3.021 | -0.046 |
| JAN   | 3.150 | 3.090 | 3.136 | -0.046 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
-

RISK MANAGEMENT
Across the Energy Enterprise

e-Acumen, Inc., is uniquely positioned to help you manage risk and
increase value. That's because our analytics, data and applications
cover all strategic aspects of the energy enterprise, from short-term
forecasting to comprehensive risk analysis and portfolio
optimization, to asset valuation and weather risk management.
Dedicated to the needs
of energy and trading companies in a dynamic and competitive world,
our approach combines best-in-class physical fundamentals with
industry-leading statistical methodologies.

e-Acumen is a venture-backed company founded in January, 1997. Since
then we have listened attentively to the market and assembled a
stellar cast of seasoned energy industry professionals and Silicon
Valley technologists. Join us as we help the industry continue its
path toward liquidity and profitable, risk-managed growth in the
exciting years ahead!

Click here to find out more about current special offers, or go to
http://www.e-acumen.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas Futures Slip Lower

    Natural gas for February delivery on the NYMEX ended down $0.053
yesterday at $2.228 per MMBtu. The March contract also lost $0.053
and finished at $2.232 per MMBtu. The market opened down and
continued to slowly slide most of the day reaching a low of $2.14 per
MMBtu before the AGA released the weekly storage report data. The AGA
showed a withdrawal of 190 Bcf for last week, somewhat more than was
expected by most. The market jumped higher after the report and
finished on an up-tick. Even though the year-on-year deficit was
reduced by 23 Bcf, there is still a long way to go with 1.1 Bcf more
in storage than a year ago. There is now 2.67 Tcf in storage and it
is about 81% full. A year ago, only 1.562 Tcf was in storage. Storage
inventories are 58% above where they were a year ago and 26% above
the AGA's 5-year average of 2,124 Bcf. Look for the market to
continue higher today mainly on short-covering. Natural gas for next
day delivery across the US and Canada was general down $0.05  $0.10
yesterday. Natural gas for next day delivery at the Henry hub lost
$0.07 to $2.31 per MMBtu.
-------------------------------------------------------------
 Exploit the enterprise-wide transaction management power deployed by
the
big names in gas.
NUCLEUS Software
ZAINET Gasmaster
The most comprehensive, totally-integrated natural gas information
system
available today.
Ask about out limited-time offer competitive upgrade program.
CAMINUS
Your Competitive Edge in Energy.
Call Caminus at (212)515-3700 or visit the website at www.caminus.com

-------------------------------------------------------------
Today's Power Bulletins
 * Duke Energy Breaks Ground on $150 Million, 165 MW Power Plant in
Guatemala
 * Caminus Strengthens Commitment to Advising Global Energy Markets
and Providing Leading Analytic Solutions to Energy Companies
 * TECO Energy Announces Sale of $400 Million of Mandatorily
Convertible Securities
 * Duke Energy Notes Rated A+ by Fitch
 * NRC to Hold Meeting Next Week on Findings of Federal Investigation
into Loss of
2 Nuclear Fuel Rods at Dominion Resources' Millstone Plant in
Waterford, Connecticut
 * PG&E Bankruptcy Judge Rules 1,250 Claims of Chromium Poisoning
Against Utility Should be Heard in California State Court
 * California PUC to Investigate Business Dealings Between State's
Utilities and Their Parent Holding Companies
 * Northeast, Mid Continent and Southeast  Power Spot Prices Slip as
Warmer Weather Returns
-------------------------------------------------------------
DO YOU JUST SEE TREES? WE SEE A FOREST!
See the forest with NewEnergy MarketPower by efficiently obtaining
information for critical market-based investment decisions and
mitigate your risk.

Use MarketPower to determine the effects of transmission congestion,
fuel costs, generator availability and load growth on market prices
to better execute your company's strategic direction.

Designed specifically for today's energy industry, MarketPower is
accurate and easy-to-use, so you can plan for tomorrow...today!

New Ideas...New Solutions...NewEnergy.
For a free 30-day trial visit us at
http://www.NewEnergyAssoc.com/justdownloadit or call us at 770 779
2957 for more information
-------------------------------------------------------------
AGA Natural Gas Storage Report

            Week                                    Prev
           Ending    Prev                   Prev    Year
| Region | 1/04/01 | Week | Diff | % Full | Year | % Full|
| Prod   |  777    |  837 | -60  |  82%   |  373 |  39%  |
| East   | 1482    | 1605 |-123  |  81%   |  933 |  50%  |
| West   |  407    |  414 |  -7  |  81%   |  256 |  51%  |

| Total  | 2666    | 2856 |-190  |  81%   | 1562 |  48%  |
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ex-Worker Threatens Nuclear Plant Employees

    Employees at Edison Internationals San Onofre nuclear power plant
were allegedly threatened by a former maintenance worker who was
fired last month. The nuclear plant was not in danger as the alleged
verbal threats were made at another location. The man was arrested on
charges of making deadly threats, storing weapons in the reach of a
minor, possession of a concealed weapon in a vehicle and possession
of illegal ammunition. Deputies found 42 weapons at the suspect's
home and another 250 at a storage facility. Law enforcement officials
also found 3,000 to 4,000 rounds of ammunition and 4 hand grenades at
the storage facility. While opening an ammunition container 2
deputies were exposed to a yellow gas, thought to be tear gas. Edison
owns 75% of the nuclear station, Sempra owns 20% and two California
towns own the other 5%.
--------------------------------------------------------------
FAST. FLEXIBLE. PROVEN.

The AURORA(TM) electric market model helps you deal with the
challenges and risks of today's energy marketplace.

Exceptionally fast and easy to learn, AURORA(TM) reflects fundamental
market drivers and gives power marketers, resource developers and
portfolio managers a better way to manage against market uncertainty
and price volatility.

AURORA delivers -

?	Price forecasts - hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly
?	On-peak, off-peak pricing
?	Resource valuation and net power costs
?	Portfolio analyses
?	Capacity expansion analyses
?	Effects of emissions
?	And much more . . .

AURORA's comprehensive databases cover all electricity markets
throughout the U.S. and Canada. The model also handles storage,
congestion pricing, and offers detailed reporting and data export
capabilities. It can be used as a stand-alone tool or be integrated
with your other business tools.

Visit us at www.epis.com or call (503) 722-2023.

EPIS, Inc.
Market Information Solutions for the Electric Power Marketplace

-------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas NYMEX Volume
02FEB   31,085
02MAR   10,038
02APR    4,248
02MAY    2,119
02JUN    1,118
02JLY    1,238
02AUG    1,668
02SEP    1,193
02OCT    1,841
02NOV      862
02DEC      892
03JAN    1,854
03FEB      602
03MAR      237
03APR       74
03MAY       22
03JUN       78
03JLY       12
03AUG        2
03SEP      233
03OCT        2
03NOV        2
03DEC      401
04JAN        3
-------------------------------------------------------------
        GET REAL about energy risk management with KWI

In today's fast moving energy markets you need to be able to manage
risk in real time.

That means knowing before you hit a risk problem, not afterwards when
it may be too late to prevent big losses spreading right through your
enterprise.

With kW3000(tm), our multi-commodity, integrated front to back office
software, you can monitor your Profit At Risk(tm), counterparty risk
and mark-to-market all in real time.

Keep alert to risk. Do it in real time. Call KWI -Americas: +1-281-
681-3301 / Europe: +44 (0) 20-7386-2700 / Asia Pacific: +61(0) 2-9976-
6111
http://www.kwi.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Government and Auto Makers to Develop Fuel Cells

    The DOE and the US Council for Automotive Research, an
organization formed by GM, Ford and DaimlerChrysler to speed up fuel
efficiency research, have agreed to fund a new program called
FreedomCar to develop hydrogen-based fuel cells for use in cars. The
agreement will require significant investment by the automobile
industry and the federal government, the council said. The new
program represents the government's commitment to devote research and
development money and future policy toward hydrogen as an eventual
replacement for gasoline, according to the DOE. FreedomCAR replaces
the Partnership for a New Generation Vehicle, whose goal was to
develop a car that gets 80 miles per gallon of fuel. PNGV was a
partnership between federal agencies, Ford, GM and DaimlerChrysler to
develop a car with 3 times the fuel efficiency of a 1994 model by
2004. The 2002 federal fiscal budget had allotted $127 million for
PNGV. The 2003 budget allotment for FreedomCAR will not be known
until the president submits his budget to Congress in a few weeks.
The program is open to all auto makers, not just domestic car
manufacturers, leaving the door open for Toyota, Honda, etc. to join
if they wish. FreedomCAR might also include suppliers from the
hydrogen production industry. Currently, fuel cells cost about $400
per kW of energy produced and last for about 3,000 hours. In order to
be competitive with combustible engines, fuel cells need to be priced
about $40 per kW and last about 5,000 hours, or about 120,000 miles.
Fuel cells can obtain hydrogen from a variety of sources, including
methanol and natural gas. Fuel cell-powered vehicles have not been
introduced because they are more expensive than gasoline-powered
vehicles and there is no commercial fuel delivery system. The US has
only 2 hydrogen-fueling stations for cars in operation, which are not
open to the public, compared to about 1,300 fueling stations for
vehicles that run on compressed natural gas and even more for those
that run on propane. The DOE secretary said that he thinks that the
nations carbon-based economy may pass from the scene to perhaps be
replaced by hydrogen. The DOE held meetings last year with auto
makers, energy suppliers, fuel cell manufacturers and educational
experts to create a plan for how a hydrogen-based economy would
operate. Currently a consensus on whether hydrogen should be shipped
through a pipe or made at the end point by electricity does not
exist. Ford, GM and DaimlerChrysler have each said they plan to have
some fuel-cell vehicles commercially available by 2004.
-------------------------------------------------------------
ENERGY.
@ENERGY(r), FEA's Complete Suite of Energy Products,
BUILT FOR THE FUTURE.

*Manage all your energy risks.
*Build and Price deals.
*Value physical assets (generation, storage, etc.)
*Report and reduce your energy risks

FEA
FINANCIAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Inc.
http://www.fea.com/?cId=17
main phone number:  1 510-548-6200
email address: info@fea.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
PHYSICAL POWER PRICES
|            | High  |  Low  | Average |
|            | $/MWh | $/MWh |  $/MWh  |
| Cinergy    | 21.00 | 18.00 |  19.25  |
| ECAR       | 21.00 | 18.00 |  19.80  |
| ERCOT      | 19.00 | 18.00 |  18.15  |
| Entergy    | 20.00 | 18.25 |  19.10  |
| TVA        | 24.30 | 22.75 |  23.50  |
| ComEd      | 18.75 | 18.50 |  18.60  |
| Nepool     | 30.00 | 28.75 |  29.30  |
| PJM West   | 24.00 | 22.50 |  22.85  |
| Main       | 19.50 | 17.00 |  18.55  |
| MAPP       | 19.75 | 17.00 |  18.75  |
| Palo Verde | 21.25 | 19.00 |  20.25  |
| Mid C      | 19.25 | 18.00 |  18.70  |
| COB        | 20.25 | 19.50 |  19.80  |
| 4 Corners  | 20.50 | 19.00 |  19.95  |
| Mead       | 21.50 | 19.25 |  19.95  |
| NP 15      | 22.50 | 20.25 |  21.35  |
| SP 15      | 22.25 | 20.50 |  21.60  |
-------------------------------------------------------------
Skipping Stone's Texas Power Markets: Restructuring / Competition
Report
guides you through the newly emerging Texas energy marketplace
terrain with
the most current information available today.
* Insight on the latest orders issued as of December 14, 2001 by both
the
PUCT and ERCOT, how they will affect the Texas energy market
* Market statistics and characteristics that will impact your business
* Graphs, tables and pictures give a snapshot for a quick grasp of the
market
* Over 130 color pages of clear, concise information for only $995
For more information, visit www.skippingstone.com and link to the
Texas
Power Markets: Restructuring / Competition Report in the Knowledge
Mall.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Todays Gas Bulletins
 * Justice Department Opens Criminal Investigation of Enron
 * Anadarko President John Seitz Succeeds Robert Allison as CEO
 * Anadarko Investor Road Show Webcast Set for January 14th
 * Venus Exploration Delisted From Nasdaq SmallCap Market; To Trade
on OTC Bulletin Board Under Symbol VENX
 * PSE&G Gas Filings Ruled on by NJ Board of Public Utilities;
Residential Natural Gas Heating Customer Bills to Decline by 3.3%
 * Qatar and Pakistan Resurrect $5 Billion Natural Gas Project to
Supply 1.6 Bcf per Day from Qatar to Pakistan by Pipeline
 * l.Enron Online Scheduled to Be Auctioned Off in New York Today
*Enron Seeks Bids for 50% Stake in South Korean Natural Gas
Distributor this Month
*Citicorp and UBS Warburg Bid for Majority Stake in Enrons Energy
Trading Operations
*Questar Market Resources Sells $200 Million in 5-Year Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
 Ziff Energy Group presents
Gas Storage 2002
Redefining the Fundamentals:
Is Gas Still in the Storage Game?
Power Drives Storage
Will the recession affect plant and storage development?
Will record high volumes in storage further depress gas prices?
Is it possible to mitigate storage risk while dealing with year-round
price
volatility?
Plus
Two Important Workshops
Calpine Corporation
Hear what the Power Generator wants from the storage industry
Bruce Bernard
Learn from the expert how to mitigate storage price risk in the 2002
gas
marketplace
February 6 & 7
Houston
Four Season Hotel
1300 Lamar Street
Register Today for this Important Conference
Call 1-800-853-6252

Email: gasconference@ziffenergy.com

Visit: www.ziffenergyconferences.com

-------------------------------------------------------------
EIA Says 2002 Natural Gas Prices to Average Just $2.05

    High storage inventories are expected to keep downward pressure
on natural gas prices throughout most of the year, according to the
EIA. However, a sharp downturn in drilling activity and growing
demand should rally prices for 2003, but for 2002 pressure on
domestic wellhead prices will keep them near $2 per Mcf, the agency
in its latest short-term energy outlook. Wellhead  prices are
expected to average $2.05 per Mcf this year before jumping to $2.65
per Mcf in 2003. Both estimates reflect dramatic reductions from the
2001 average of $4.14 per Mcf. The agency's quarterly and annual
price estimates are up slightly from its December report, when EIA
pegged the 2002 gas price at $1.96 per Mcf.
-------------------------------------------------------------
 R. W. Beck is an engineering and management consulting firm serving
utilities, developers, financiers and governments worldwide.  Founded
in
1942, we help our clients face energy market challenges by providing:
Portfolio Analysis to improve diversification and risk-adjusted
performance
of energy assets.
Risk Control services to help reduce the probability of losses.
Systems and Facilities services to identify, design and implement
effective
risk management systems.
Training to improve your ability to identify and manage tactical and
strategic risks.
Please visit our web site at http://www.rwbeck.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
POWER FUTURES
| Month |   COB   | Change |   PV    | Change |
| FEB   |  22.00  | -1.00  |  22.50  | -1.00  |
| MAR   |  21.00  | +1.50  |  22.00  | -1.25  |
| APR   |  21.00  | +2.00  |  24.00  | -0.50  |
| MAY   |  20.00  | +1.75  |  25.00  | -0.50  |
| JUN   |  21.00  | +0.50  |  30.00  | -1.00  |
| JUL   |  29.00  | +1.00  |  40.00  | +0.00  |
| AUG   |  39.50  | +2.50  |  44.25  | -1.25  |
| SEP   |  35.00  | +5.00  |  35.00  | -0.75  |
| OCT   |  26.00  | -1.50  |  26.25  | -4.50  |
| NOV   |  27.00  | +0.00  |  26.25  | -3.75  |
| DEC   |  27.00  | -1.00  |  26.25  | -3.75  |
| JAN   |  27.00  | -1.00  |  26.00  | -4.75  |
| Month | Entergy | Change | Cinergy | Change |
| FEB   |  19.80  | +0.10  |  21.70  | -1.70  |
| MAR   |  20.60  | -0.30  |  22.60  | -0.30  |
| APR   |  20.60  | -0.30  |  22.60  | -0.30  |
| MAY   |  24.15  | -0.10  |  26.10  | -0.30  |
| JUN   |  30.25  | -0.25  |  33.50  | -0.50  |
| JUL   |  38.75  | -0.25  |  43.50  | -0.50  |
| AUG   |  38.75  | -0.25  |  43.50  | -0.50  |
| SEP   |  21.50  | -0.50  |  23.60  | -0.15  |
| OCT   |  22.50  | +0.00  |  23.25  | -0.25  |
| NOV   |  22.50  | +0.00  |  23.25  | -0.25  |
| DEC   |  22.50  | +0.00  |  23.25  | -0.25  |
| JAN   |  24.75  | +0.00  |  26.50  | +0.00  |
-------------------------------------------------------------
Power Futures
| Month |  PJM  | Change |
| FEB   | 25.25 | -0.50  |
| MAR   | 24.85 | -0.15  |
| APR   | 24.85 | -0.15  |
| MAY   | 28.60 | -0.20  |
| JUN   | 36.25 | -0.25  |
| JUL   | 49.90 | -0.35  |
| AUG   | 49.90 | -0.35  |
| SEP   | 25.20 | -0.35  |
| OCT   | 25.20 | -0.05  |
| NOV   | 25.20 | -0.05  |
| DEC   | 25.20 | -0.05  |
| JAN   | 28.90 | +0.10  |
-------------------------------------------------------------
PJM and Midwest ISO Plan Common Market

    The PJM Interconnection and the Midwest ISO plan to form a common
wholesale electric market that would cover 27 states, plus the
District of Columbia and Manitoba. The plan is still preliminary, but
the parties have released an unexecuted letter of intent, which they
will discuss with the member committees on January 16th and 17th. The
market would affect about 32 million people. It would include
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware and Washington DC, plus
the portions of West Virginia and Ohio served by Allegheny Energy,
which will form PJM West this year, along with Duquesne Light. The
Midwest ISO includes Manitoba, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota,
Wyoming, Minnesota, Wisconsin, part of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas,
Missouri, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio. The letter
of intent states that the market will facilitate wholesale markets,
both in areas where retail electric industry restructuring is
occurring, as well as areas where retail restructuring is still being
evaluated. The market will allow the larger region to rapidly realize
the benefits that industry restructuring at the wholesale level had
otherwise promised but not yet fully achieved. Detail are still
sketchy, they could not say how transmission might be coordinated,
nor which electric products might be included. However, PJM
emphasized that it would not be a merger of the ISOs and do not yet
have an estimated time frame for startup.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Seminars, Inc. Announces Key Seminar Offerings for January:

Energy Seminars will be going to Florida and Calgary in 2002!

Click to www.energyseminars.com to see our 2002 schedule.

Register on-line at http://www.energyseminars.com or call Registrar
Gina Patrick

Phone: 281-362-7979
FAX: 281-296-9922
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
Baker Hughes December 2001 Rig Counts

    Baker Hughes says the international rig count for December 2001
was 752, up 11 from 741 in November 2001 and up 47 from 705 in
December 2000. The international offshore rig count for December 2001
was 222 up 2 from 220 in November 2001 and up 21 from 201 in December
2000. The US rig count for December 2001 was 901 down 99 from 1,000
in November 2001 and down 196 from 1,097 in December 2000. The
Canadian rig count for December 2001 was 264 down 2 from 266 in
November 2001 and down 146 from 410 in December 2000. The worldwide
rig count for December 2001 was 1,917 down 90 from 2,007  in November
2001 and down 295 from 2,212 in December 2000.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Western Resources Sues PNM

    In a bid to salvage a $4.5 billion sale of its utilities, Western
Resources has said that PNM cannot cancel the deal while decisions by
regulators that a condition of the sale was unlawful and an ordered
rate cut is under appeal. Western Resources, which is suing to force
PNM to complete the sale, detailed its position in a letter to PNM,
which was disclosed in a SEC filing. PNM, New Mexico's largest
utility, has formally rescinded its offer to purchase Westerns KPL
and KGE units. According to PNM, Kansas regulators effectively killed
the deal last July when they rejected Western's plan to place the
utilities into a separate company, a condition of the sale, and cut
customer power rates, lowering the utilities' expected revenue. After
the regulatory decision, the companies entered into negotiations,
which broke down last August. PNM filed suit against Western in
October to end the sale and win unspecified damages. Western in turn
filed suit in November, seeking hundreds of millions of dollars in
damages from PNM for breach of contact. The purchase agreement called
for PNM to pay 55 million shares, worth $1.6 billion and assume $2.9
billion of debt. In the termination letter, PNM said Western is
unlikely to overturn the regulators' rejection of the purchase, and
the rate cut will have a materially adverse effect on the business.
PNM claims those conditions give it the right to cancel the sale
without paying a breakup fee of up to $35 million. Western Resources
says that it is working to reach a settlement with the regulators by
the merger deadline at the end of this year and that doubts about its
success does not give PNM the legal right to withdraw.
-------------------------------------------------------------

                Progas Storage Services, Inc

Was recently organized to offer specialized natural gas storage
services to marketers and end users servicing the upper Midwest and
Northeast market regions along the major transmission systems in
Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, and Michigan. PGSMI has 10 bcf of
potential working capacity which will offer service along TXG, ANR,
Midwestern, and is currently evaluating for purchase another 21 bcf
of potential working capacity which can be serviced by these and
other systems in the region. PGSMI also explores for natural gas in
the Gulf Coast region through a wholly owned subsidiary. Progas
intends to go public through a route of private industry offerings,
and an IPO or registration. For more information on services or the
company mail to: gastorage@aol.com or for AOL mail to
gastorage@aol.com;
The company's executive and administrative office is located in
Abilene, Texas with storage operations in Owensboro, KY and
exploration operations in Corpus Christi, TX.
Vist our website http://www.progas.net/wip
Progas Storage Services, Inc
8610 S. Hwy 277
Abilene, TX 79606

Ph 915 698 3699
Fx 915 698 2859
-------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The TSE 300 dipped 6.26 points to 7775.78
The CRB Index gained 0.10 points to 195.03
The US Dollar increased 0.16 points to 116.94
The Dow declined 56.46 points to 10094.09
The S&P 500 dropped 5.57 points to 1155.14
The Nasdaq was down 10.89 points to 2044.89
February NYMEX Crude Oil fell 1.07 to 20.18
Canadian-US Exchange lost 0.0029 to 1.5950
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pure Text, Lotus, AOL, Yahoo, Excite, Readers-subscribe by writing to:
enerfax-subscribe@egroups.com

Outlook Email Readers-subscribe to webmail by writing to:
mailto:join-EnerfaxDaily@relay.netatlantic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Washington DC
January 24, 2002
Spencer Abraham U.S. Secretary of Energy to address energy community
on
potential security and commerce threats. Also to speak will be key
directors
from the CIA, SPR, IEA, SPR and more. See complete
detail and register today at
http://www.wesc.org
-------------------------------------------------------------
Please welcome our advertisers by visiting these websites.
http://www.e-acumen.com
http://www.kwi.com/
http://www.fea.com/
http://www.caminus.com/
http://www.progas.net/wip
http://www.ziffenergyconferences.com/
http://www.energyseminars.com
http://www.skippingstone.com
http://www.epis.com
http://www.rwbeck.com
http://www.NewEnergyAssoc.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Vasant-

I hope you had a wonderful vacation back home, and are rested and recovered
from the long flight back.

I wanted to give you an update of the EOL project, the Gas Model, and of my
intentions here at Enron.

Software (in compiled C on the Unix platform) has been developed and debugged
to listen to the EOL trades, process them, book them, and file them away. In
addition, software has been developed and debugged to mark these to market on
a continual basis, and to store the entirety of open positions on EOL in a
dynamic matrix facilitating analysis. IT has yet to get back with me on how
the software can be informed of those trades ultimately rejected for credit
purposes.

These data files are stored in a format for reading by Excel or by SAS, for
which I have written the data step program and basic tabulation routines
elucidating the structure of the data.

I am in the process of documenting all of this for you.

With regards the Gas Model and its slow performance on the Compaq, Dell has
agreed to loan me one of their competing machines to the Compaq, to see if
the performance issue of the LP is related to the Compaq. I have been
researching this issue with IT here and with Compaq and Dell. The new machine
will be here any day now (no financial obligation to anyone), and I will be
able to immediately ascertain whether the problem the model is having is
Compaq-specific.

I am also in the process of documenting the Gas Model for you.

I've tried to do my best for you, Vasant, but I have been frustrated by not
only the death of my mother but some internal systems in IT here. Just the
other day, SAS could not open a full query of the EOL database because there
wasn't enough free space on the server's hard drive for the workfiles. In
discussing some of these issues with some good friends of mine in power
trading, people whom I have known for over 10 years, they indicated they were
ubiquitous here. The power traders have similar PC's to my new one, and they
have complained from Day 1 that theirs are slower than their old ones.  Also,
there remains a large frustration with the development of data warehouses;
during my brief tenure here IT has gone through two differing proposals as to
how to address this. When I have been told of tools available for real-time
data harvesting, my requests for such have typically been met with "well, we
have it, but we haven't really tested it yet." An example is the weather: we
still do not record to disk the hourly NWS observations from the GOES
satellite.

My interests here are to help Enron to do well, because I will do well only
if Enron does well. These aren't empty words- my IRA is 100% invested in the
Enron stock fund. I believe my best contributions to Enron will be in the
areas of systems as well as modeling, and the difficulty working in the
Research Group, in terms of systems development, is that, frankly, few people
at Enron seem to care what a researcher thinks about our systems. We aren't
directly generating revenues for Enron, and we aren't really their customers,
except in our relatively small deparrtmental infrastructure expenses.

As it happens, Power Trading posted an opening for a Modeling and Forecasting
person, and I spoke with them and they asked me to take the job, reporting to
George Hopley. It is a wonderful opportunity for me, Vasant, as they are
interested in large system modelng of power grids as well as improving their
traders' access to real-time fundamentals data. I was completely candid with
Kevin Presto regarding my shortcomings here in Research- I told him you were
disgusted with me because I repeatedly failed to meet time deadlines. They
also understand I have yet to be at Enron for 1 year, and thus may only bid
on a job with your permission. We agree the move is good for Enron; we all
work for Enron, and your acquiescence to the move does not endorse it but
merely permit it. They are comfortable with me- they have known me for years
as a hard worker, honest and unpretensive. They have already ordered a
state-of-the-art Unix workstation and server for me, and they have told me
they will commit whatever resources are necessary for me to be successful,
including hiring an Analyst to work for me. And, I have already been able to
teach their analysts improved techniques for data harvesting and analysis I
have learned here.

So, I am requesting your permission to bid for this job opening. It would be
a lateral move in position and salary, and I would commit to you to help you
in any way possible in the future with regards the Gas Model or the EOL
database. I will continue to work on their improvement, and complete their
documentation.

As it happens, I am away on Enron business in Portland Monday and Tuesday,
and will be back Wednesday. I had wanted to talk face-to-face instead of by
email, but Enron business supercedes- I am on a team designing the data
warehouse for floor trader support.

Clayton.


Please carry your cell phone with you (with the power on) while you are at
work during normal business hours.  It is important that I can reach you when
it becomes necessary.  Thank you for your cooperation.


request_number:  DS-BPA:375
firstname:  Sarah
lastname:  Westenberg
e-mail:  sawestenberg@bpa.gov
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JCG-01 and )02.
page_numbers:
request_text:  Please disclose and/or produce copies of any and all
communications, from October 16, 2001 to the present, between any BPA
representative and any representative of any other party, concerning any of
the following subjects:

a. The general structure of the Cost Recovery Adjustment Clauses (CRACs)
described in the testimony of the Joint Customers;

b. Any differences between the form of the CRACs described in the testimony
of the Joint Customers and the CRACs contained in BPA's Amended Proposal, or
those contained in BPA's Supplemental Proposal;

c. The detailed mechanics of implementing the CRACs described in the
testimony of the Joint Customers;

d. Revenue effects of the CRACs described in the testimony of the Joint
Customers, any modifications; or

e. Any aspect of the Partial Stipulation and Settlement Agreement and the
Parties' Proposal attached thereto.

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, "disclose
and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce" any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

response_text:  There are no communications that fit the description since
October 16, 2001 has not occurred.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  53.180.74.220
3.  Remote IP Address:  53.180.74.220
4.  Form URL:
http://www.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT; BPA 4.01
SP2; BPA 5.01 SP1)


Brian,

Who do I talk to about getting Daren Farmer a Labor Distribution report. He
needs to see what employees are hitting his RC.  I know that we have
discussed this prior and soem Managers are receiving a monthly report but he
is not.  Who can help us???

Thank you!
Yvette
x3.5953


From Gene Vaughan:

 <<Email 10-15-01--re 10-18 mtg.doc>>  <<Agenda and materials for
10-18-01.doc>>  <<Planning and Budget Committee Report.doc>>

> Marilou A. Schopper
> Senior Vice President
> Center for Houston's Future
>
> Address:  1200 Smith, Suite 700, Houston, TX 77002-4400
> Phone: 713-844-3614
Cellular:  713-857-3506
> Fax: 713-844-0214
> E-mail: mschopper@houston.org
>
> Please learn more about us on the World Wide Web at:  www.houston.org
>
>
 - Email 10-15-01--re 10-18 mtg.doc
 - Agenda and materials for 10-18-01.doc
 - Planning and Budget Committee Report.doc


FYI.  We need more transactions on EOL......I'd like to meet with you and lay
out plans for attacking this specifically.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000
08:22 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Peter Berzins @ ENRON                           11/30/2000 06:01 PM

To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine
Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lola Willis/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc
Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simone La Rose/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Average Deal Count as of 11-29-00

Changes to the Report Starting this Week:

-  The Gas Daily East and the East Graphs have been combined to just East.

-   The ENA Canada East and Central Graphs have been combined to just Central.

-   The NG Price Book is now named Financial Desk and shows values with and
without exchange traded future transactions.

Notes for this Week's Report:

*   North American Gas has increased its overall average daily EOL deal count
by over 1,000 trades a day since October.  There are now approximately 3,100
trades a day in North American Gas alone which are being traded on EOL.

*  The newly combined East Region in North American Gas has approximately
doubled its average daily EOL deal count and average daily EOL volume since
October.

*  The newly combined Central Region in North American Gas has increased its
average daily EOL deal count about 38% since October, from 498 to 685 deals
per day.   However, the average daily EOL volume has remained steady since
October.

*  The newly named Financial Desk in North American Gas has increased its
average daily EOL deal count about 41% since October, from 494 to 698 deals
per day.  In addition, the average daily EOL volume has increased about 25%
since October.

*  California Power has increased its average daily EOL deal count by over
32% since October.  The average daily EOL volume for California Power has
more than doubled since October.

*  Midwest Power has increased its average daily EOL volume by about 75%
since October.  However, the average daily EOL deal count for Midwest Power
has remained steady since October.

*  Southeast Power has decreased its average daily EOL deal count by over 51%
since October.  The average daily EOL volume for Southeast Power has
decreased significantly as well.  However, these are approximately the levels
we had seen in prior months before October.

*  UK Power has more than doubled its average daily EOL deal count since
October from 8 deals to over 15 deals.  The average daily EOL volume has
remained fairly level.

*  Nordic Power has increased its average daily EOL deal count about 45%
since October, from 20 to 29 deals per day.  In addition, the average daily
EOL volume has increased about 25% since October.

*  US Weather has steadily decreased its total monthly EOL deal count from a
high in June of 241 deals to recent low of only 25 deals.  However, there has
been a slight increase in November to 31 EOL US Weather deals with one more
day to go..

*  Enron Metals trades done via EOL has risen by approximately 85% since
October, from a daily average of 150 to a daily average of 280 for November.

*  Coal trades have decreased significantly from the levels seen in October.
The total monthly EOL deal count for November stands now at only about 21% of
the total in October with only one more day to go.

---------------
The following files contain a graphical view of the average deal count and
volumes per month by Commodity for EOL and OTC transactions since the launch
of EnronOnline. This information is for comparative analysis only.  Do not
update links when opening these files.

AVERAGE DEAL COUNTS FOR COMMODITIES (excluding Global Products, which
displays monthly totals)

NA GAS BREAKOUT BY REGION (Non-Averaged, including Volume and Notional Value)

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please contact one of the
following:

Torrey Moorer x3-6218
Matt Motsinger x3-5221
Pete Berzins x5-7594

Pete
EnronOnline


?CAREER CHANGERS SEMINAR: (May 01 grads. are welcome to attend) a seminar for
individuals considering transitioning into a different line of work.? We will
focus on how to leverage transferrable ability, skills and knowledge into a
different career path.? This seminar will be on a Saturday in June,
tentatively either 6/9 or 6/16 from 10 to 3.? If you are interested in
attending please send me an email, letting me know your preference as far as
a date.? We will hold the seminar on the date with that has greatest
preference. ? If you have not sent me an email and want to attend please
reply and let me know if you have a date preference.


Thanks, Hedy:

Not good. John White has a similar view, i.e., Loretta doesn't have many
choices given that the Legislature hasn't executed.  John did say, however,
that if we can provide the legal analysis to support doing something other
than "suspend," Loretta is likely to be amenable.  Seems like it would be
useful to try to get the analysis, assuming that  there's legal analysis to
support an alternative to "suspend."

Hertzberg and I are trading calls.  Will report back as soon as I hear
anything.

Best,
Jeff

	Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>
	07/26/2001 04:02 PM

		 To: Paul Kaufman <paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Jeff Dasovich
<jdasovic@enron.com>, Bev Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, sgovenar@govadv.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bill Julien

I spoke with Bill and gave him the background on the DA issue (Turn's
core/noncore, the green portfolio, etc) and asked him about some
possibilities - i.e. could Loretta delay action until after the
Legislature acts on SB18, and/or AB 82, etc.
He responded that Loretta likes the SB18 approach, which she sees as
cheaper and cleaner.  But she also is very loyal to the state and
believes the timing is dependent upon the Treasurer's assessment of the
need.  Right now Angelides accepts counsel's view that DA has to be
eliminated to market the bonds.  Loretta believes the only authority the
Commission has is when to suspend DA, not whether to suspend it.
Angelides is continuing to press her to eliminate it, but she had hoped
the Legislature would take action to give the Commission some
flexibility.  That hasn't happened.  Their view is that the language of
AB 1x needs to be changed legislatively, since their authority is so
limited.  He expects action in the near future, but doesn't know exactly
when.


The Risk Management Policy requires signoff on the DPR by individuals
designated by the COO and CRO of Enron Corp.  Currently, Greg is the sole
authorized signer.  Given that he is moving into cyberspace it has been
proposed that we split the world in half with John L taking the Western
Hemisphere and John S taking the rest of the world.  I am currently drafting
a memo for Jeff and Rick' s signature to that effect,  In the meantime, I
would expect that Greg remain the official signer.  I will forward that draft
memo to you for commentary under separate cover.  Once we have agreed on who
as responsibility for what, we will ask that the Johns reply to an E-mail
request for approval. Eventually, we will create an automatic approval via
the Executive Reports viewer.  Before finalizing process, there are some
issues that ought to be clarified, such as, who will signoff for the Merchant
Portfolios that are not part of either Johns direct responsibility (Southern
Cone, CALME), Broadband, the Capital Portfolio.  For pure process reasons, we
would like to keep the number of signers ot a minimum.  It is difficult
enough to get Greg to sign off in a timely manner, it would be too cumbersome
for Mike Moscoso or Chris Abel to chase down someone from every business unit
every day for approvals.
Please let me know if you have any suggestions or changes to this proposal.
Ted x3-3324
ps. Liz, make sure Greg pays attention to this e-mail!


Can you handle this.  Please forward all names on the daily P&L sheet.  I get
a copy every day if you need.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000 04:11
PM ---------------------------

Brian Hoskins@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
10/04/2000 11:55 AM
To: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fangming Zhu/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: requirement document

Ina,

We're setting up a secure message board for all the traders on the floor.
Can you please provide Fangming with our current list of gas traders?

Thanks,
Brian

Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications on 10/04/00 12:01 PM
-----

	Fangming Zhu@ENRON
	10/03/00 11:14 AM

		 To: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: requirement document

Brian,
Please provide the list of user's NT loginID and their full name  whoever
will use this application. I am going to set up the security for them while I
am buiding the application.
Thanks,
Fangming

	Brian Hoskins@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	09/28/2000 02:31 PM

		 To: Fangming Zhu/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Allen Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: requirement document

Fangming,

Looks good.  That's exactly what we're looking for.  John, please comment if
there are any additional features you'd like to add.

Brian

Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

	Fangming Zhu@ENRON
	09/28/00 02:23 PM

		 To: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Allen Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: requirement document

Hi, Brian:

Please review attached requirement document and reply this message with any
comments. Once you approve it, I am going to build the application.

Thanks,

Fangming


Here is what I have so far.   One of the floor tech's I chat with is Ishi
Carter.  His number is 713-853-5580.

I learned some things today.  Ishi said Enron hires techies through 2
companies New Boston Technologies (713-626-4900) and Comsys (713-547-0700).
Techies work for these companies for 6 months and then Enron may or may not
make them an offer.

Ishi said it would be ok for you to call him.

But, I'm thinking I should at least know your name first.

Also, we have a ton of other IT type people in the company I'm going to chat
with.

I get you more scoop later.


Jim

I made minor changes as per Paul's suggestions

---------------------------------------- QUESTIONS TO ASHLEY BROWN ---------------------------------------------------

1) Profit-RTO - Where does your proposed organization fit  in the attached graph in terms of end state ? Stage III? Stage IV?

SEE ENCLOSURE

2) Regarding document "Response of National Grid USA to questions posed by the Commission": Does it imply that core, for profit functions should not be subject to a stakeholder process? Wasn't the NETA design subject to an extensive
consultation, even for profit, NG core functions?

3) If each Transco manages it own OASIS, how can we avoid fragmentation (balkanization), pancaking and many other
negative aspects and seams that the RTO process is trying to eliminate? How can you achieve one-stop shopping? By outsourcing those functions to one singole  third party?

4) As a follow up question, what are the mechanisms to assure that this "potential" fragmentation may lead to underinvestments in T, particularly in important inter-tie investments?

5) What kind of PBR mechanism are you envisioning for the Transco-RTO? Are you thinking about including "external" measures such as cost to provide ancillary services, congestion costs or costs incurred in energy balancing?

6) Are you envisioning an RTO-Transco model which will assume that all transmission assets in the region will be divested? Or can the model live with a "light" RTO where part of the assets are divested but others are not (and sign an operating agreement with the RTO. Would your proposed Matrix of RTO Functions (page 9) still be robust under this scenario?

7) Can your proposed RTO model dovetail with an LMP/Congestion Management system based on financial rights? [Our understanding is that NETA completely reorganized the UK pool. The UK system now looks like a "self-dispatch", physical rights model]

8) As a follow up of the previous question: Assuming Alliance adopts a self-dispatch, physical rights approach similar to the one NG operates in the UK today. Don't you think that this will create significant barriers/seams with other neighboring RTOs, considering that there seems to be a general trend towards security constrained dispatch, LMP and financial rights for most RTOs in the US?

9) If your proposed system can be dovetailed to a central dispatch, LMP/financial rights, shouldn't some functions in your "Martix of RTO Functions" be collapsed? For example: management of congestion prices, calculation of congestion, operations of energy markets and generation redispatch?

10) Procurement and deployment of ancillary services is listed as non-core. However, in the UK system, this represents a significant role of the Transco, with incentives and penalties attached to its achievement. Is there a different vision or do you assume that those functions will end up being developed by the RTO and consequently will be part of the PBR formula?

11) Generation interconnection. Obviously, your proposal did not go that far. Conceptually, do you favor a system whereby T fixed costs are recovered via a postage stamp rate across an entire region or do you favor the UK model whereby fixed costs (use of the system) are calculated based on incremental cost and have a strong locational component (and connection costs are treates separately, according to a shallow method?

12) Establishment of transmission rates. How to reconcile the fact that those should be regulated and you propose that the Transco itself will establish its T rates? Are you thinking about some possible non-regulated activities?

13) You stated that separation and control of T assets persists, to a large extent, in the Collaborative Model proposed as part of the Southeast Mediation. Do you think that the Independent System Administration model is superior in this regard? What are the key important differences in your view in the conceptual design of those models

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The UK postal authorities, in their attempt to make the US authorities look
good by comparison, have now advised that there was a misprint on their
notice. The postal code at our London office, it now turns out, is W1J 5DU.
Please note.


This is the final OBA letter that we should be using to terminate the volumetric OBAs.  Lee will be down sometime tomorrow afternoon to review all our letters.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pryor, Tony
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:24 PM
To:	Lindberg, Lorraine
Subject:	FW: TW OBAs Calling for Volumetric Settlement
Importance:	High

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pryor, Tony
Sent:	Saturday, September 22, 2001 9:16 AM
To:	Huber, Lee
Cc:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	TW OBAs Calling for Volumetric Settlement

Lee, as I mentioned on Friday, the purpose of the attached letter is to terminate the volumetric OBAs and revert to the tariff OBA to avail ourselves of the "hammer" in Section 4(b) of the tariff form (Sheet 147) which permits us to credit the operators' scheduled volumes to the imbalance, ie, confiscate their gas.  I'm told that the subject OBAs were individually negotiated and deviate from the tariff in one way or another.  They also said that these OBAs allow cashout, but don't require it, and that's the problem:  The operators are not voluntarily paying back the gas because in many locations (ie, San Juan), the pipeline is full and they don't want to short their markets.  Because I haven't seen any of the agreements that we propose to terminate (the TW people have just finished briefing them), I told the group that an attorney needs to look at each one to make sure that we cannot, in fact, force cashout.  In most of them, I'm told, cashout is at the option of the party owing the imbalance.

As I also mentioned, this letter is a template; a starting point.  It must be tailored to each OBA being terminated. For example, the Section numbers are not filled in, and must be supplied. You will note in the second paragraph of the letter that we say, essentially, that in capacity-constrained area, if volumetric settlement is to occur, it will need to be accomplished through crediting their scheduled volumes to the imbalance.  From my conversations with TW, my understanding is that most of the volumetric OBAs do not have a provision expressly permitting us to do that.  Indeed, as I mentioned above, that's my understanding of why we're terminating the volumetric OBAs.  Even if there is no provision in the subject OBAs for crediting scheduled volumes, my opinion is that we can offer that as an option, because that is still a way of balancing "in kind", but omit the reference to the agreement (as I have noted with brackets).  If they don't want to do that, cashout is the only other option; that's our way of forcing cashout.

Thanks for your help, and if you need help, you might ask Maria or Dari.  However, I don't envision that it will take much time to do any one letter.................Tony


Another FAS 133 Offsite meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, Feb 29 (all
day).  Sally asked me to forward this to you - would like you to attend if at
all possible.  Scott, this is an FYI for you - I know you will be overseas on
this date.

Patti
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/18/2000 09:53 AM
---------------------------

	Bob Butts @ ENRON
	02/16/2000 05:31 PM

Sent by: Dortha Gray@ENRON
To: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paige B Grumulaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron
Baker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger G Leworthy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
James J Brown/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patty Grutzmacher/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Kimberly Scardino/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kent Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Wanda Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, John B
Echols/HOU/EES@EES, Rodney Faldyn/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tod Lindholm/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mark E Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cassandra
Schultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey E
Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, P
Sreekumar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Shirley Tijerina/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margarite
Cunningham/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carmella
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole Scott/LON/ECT@ECT, Melinda McCarty/HOU/EES@EES,
Shelley Grover/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Bobbie
Moody/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandy Lewelling/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Karen Myer/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Norma
Petry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Araceli
Romero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Leigh Ann Van
Houten/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: FAS 133 Offsite

Please see attached memo.


Be sure to talk to Peter on any of the Canada related master nettings so he can orchestrate any necessary Canada filings.  I have spoken with him on this matter so he should be up to speed.  Any questions, stop by.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lech Kalembka" <Lech.Kalembka@cwt.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, November 10, 2001 6:49 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Cc:	Cook, Mary; David Mitchell
Subject:	Re: FW: Enron Canada Corp

We will need the "organizational ID" number for the Delaware, Maryland and
Texas entities.  If you wish, we can obtain this information from CT Corp.
or a similar service provider for a charge of $12 per entity.

Also, for UCC filing purposes, we need to know whether any counterparty is
a "transmitting utility", i.e., entity primarily engaged in transmitting or
producing electricity or transmitting goods by pipeline.

Finally, I assume you will consult with local counsel regarding the
Canadian counterparties.

Thank you.

Lech Kalembka
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, NY  10038
Tel.: (212) 504-6918
Fax: (212) 504-6666
E-mail: lech.kalembka@cwt.com

                    "Heard,
                    Marie"               To:     lech.kalembka@cwt.com
                    <Marie.Heard@        cc:
                    ENRON.com>           Subject:     FW: Enron Canada
                    Office:              Corp

                    11/06/2001
                    02:04 PM

Is there anything else you need for BP Amoco?

Marie
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   "Dixon, Billy D" <billy.dixon@bp.com>@ENRON
> Sent:   Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:00 PM
> To:     Heard, Marie
> Subject:     RE: Enron Canada Corp
>
> Principal Operating Offices:
>
> BP Corporation North America Inc.
> 200 East Randolph Drive
> Chicago, Illinois 60601
>
> BP Energy Company
> 501 West Lake Park Boulevard
> Houston, Texas 77079
>
> Vastar Resources, Inc.
> 200 East Randolph Drive
> Chicago, Illinois 60601
>
> BP Canada Energy Company
> 240 - 4th Avenue S.W.
> Calgary, Alberta T2P 4H4
>
> BP Canada Energy Marketing Corp.
> 200 East Randolph Drive
> Chicago, Illinois 60601
>
> Cibola Energy Services Corporation
> 350 N. St. Paul Street
> Dallas, TX 75201
>
> IGI Resources, Inc.
> 200 East Randolph Drive
> Chicago, Illinois 60601
>
> BP Oil Supply Company
> 200 East Randolph Drive
> Chicago, Illinois 60601
>
> BP Products North America Inc.
> 200 East Randolph Drive
> Chicago, Illinois 60601
>
> BP Amoco Chemical Company
> 200 East Randolph Drive
> Chicago, Illinois 60601
>
> Atlantic Richfield Company
> 333 S. Hope Street
> Los Angeles, CA 90071
>
> Amoco Production Company
> 501 WestLake Park Boulevard
> Houston, Texas 77079
>
> BP Chemicals Inc.
> 200 East Randolph Drive
> Chicago, Illinois 60601
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heard, Marie [mailto:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:54 AM
> To: billy.dixon@bp.com
> Subject: RE: Enron Canada Corp
>
>
> I sure will if you will tell me the principal place of business of all
> your entities party to the Master Netting Agreement.
>
> Enron Canada Corp.
> 3500, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W.
> Calgary, Alberta  T2P 4H2
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:      "Dixon, Billy D" <billy.dixon@bp.com>@ENRON
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 7:47 AM
> > To:   Heard, Marie
> > Subject:   Enron Canada Corp
> >
> > Would you please tell me where Enron Canada Corp.'s principal place
> of
> > business in Canada is located?
> >
> > Very truly yours,
> >
> > BILLY
> > Billy D. Dixon
> > Attorney
> > BP America Inc.
> > 501 Westlake Park Blvd., Rm 16.166
> > Houston, Texas 77079
> > Direct 281/366-4745
> > Fax 281/366-5901
> > billy.dixon@bp.com
> >
> > ***IMPORTANT -- THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS HERETO ARE
> > ATTORNEY-CLIENT
> > AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.  If you
> have
> > received this email in error, do not under any circumstances read,
> > forward,
> > copy, disseminate or save this email or any of its attachments.  If
> > you have
> > received this email in error, take the following actions: (1) reply
> to
> > this
> > email indicating that you received this email in error, and (2)
> delete
> > and
> > completely erase this email and its attachments from your computer
> and
> > any
> > backup systems or "Deleted Items" folders.
> >
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and
> may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply
> to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all
> copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> not
> intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a
> binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be
> relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise.
> Thank you.
> **********************************************************************

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================


I met with Sally Painter to discuss our Gore 2000 strategy.  From this
meeting, Sally drafted the attached action plan with the following near-term
action items:

1) She suggests that we draft 1-2 page issue briefs on our signature policy
issues.  I suggested 4 policy areas on which Enron has unique experience:
electricity deregulation, e-commerce (trading), energy services, and
broadband.  We spoke about this at a DC staff meeting and we set a mid-June
deadline for the completion of these papers...of course with input from all.

2) We have set June 13 as the date for the Enron business outreach dinner.
We need to decide if we want to do it in DC or Houston.  We also need to
decide if we want to bring in our colleagues from different companies or
associations to attend this dinner.  Sally suggested we try to bring in 8-10
senior executives from our industry(ies).

3) We need to set a date to go to Gore 2000 in Nashville to meet the
working-level policy staff.  I will ask our respective support staff to
schedule this.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks - Chris

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 05/24/2000 09:02
AM ---------------------------

Sally Painter <SPainter@fontheiminternational.com> on 05/19/2000 02:23:10 PM
To: "'chris.long@enron.com'" <chris.long@enron.com>
cc: Ken Levinson <KLevinson@fontheiminternational.com>, Jeremy Bash
<Jbash@Fontheiminternational.com>

Subject: Follow-Up from Meeting

 <<Enron6months.doc>>

Chris,  per our meeting, I have attached a new draft.  I believe it
covers all that we discussed.  Have a good weekend.

Best,

Sally

 - Enron6months.doc


We will be limiting the attendee list for the Wed fundies meetings.  If you received this email then consider yourself invited. Please let the schedulers know that only Patti will be attending in the future.  This is due to available space in the conference rooms.

Thanks,
Mike


Mark,

I don't get all warm and fuzzy about point #1 - what do you think?

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 02/17/2000 12:19
AM ---------------------------

Edmund Cooper
02/16/2000 07:22 PM
To: Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Yorkshire Electricity - EOL comfort letter

Dear All,

Attached is a draft proposed comfort letter dealing with the issues that
Yorkshire Electricity has with respect to the ETA.  I have forwarded this to
their lawyers' for comments.

Please note that the letter does not amend the ETA, and is in no way
inconsistent with the current legal structure of EOL.

I have told Yorkshire's lawyer that this document is subject to internal
commercial sign-off, so if you do have any comments please feel free to
forward them to me.

Thanks, Edmund.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 09:19
AM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/03/2000 08:53:16 AM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Dalphon, Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
*cfrankl2@enron.com" <cfrankl2@enron.com>, " - *joan.veselack@enron.com"
<joan.veselack@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com" <vversen@enron.com>, " -
*cindy.vachuska@enron.com" <cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " -
*cora_pendergrass@enron.com" <cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " -
*mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>, " - *scott.goodell@enron.com"
<scott.goodell@enron.com>, " - *steve.gillespie@enron.com"
<steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " - *cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " -
*despey@enron.com" <despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com"
<joann.collins@enron.com>
Subject: CES Daily March Requirements for 4/3 and 4/4

The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for   4/3
(Intraday)     and 4/4  .    There are two worksheets:  The one labelled with
today's date contains the volumes that we need at each of the delivery points
indicated.   The schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas
is needed at a specific point.   The AGL volumes in this spreadsheet are not
current and should be ignored.

The sheet labelled 'Daily Change' shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in
the requested daily volume relative to a prior value.  For the current gas
day,
the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using the previous day's
volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current gas day is 3/28, then
the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for 3/28).  For
tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the change is computed using
the First-of-the-month volumes requested for those days.  (e.g., If today is
3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect to the
first-of-the-month volumes for those days.)   This sheet should be useful in
determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that we take or turn back.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 04-03-00 Daily VolsAM.xls


We need to discuss this. Sounds like bs to me. Rick


did this letter go?

Wayne Gresham
04/14/2000 11:40 AM
To: Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: WFA

Attached is a proposed letter to Palmer.  Let me know your thoughts.

Wayne


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]    2002-2003 Universities and Experiences Regional Conference 2001: A Southwest Odyssey 2001 Fall Seminars New YPO Public Web Site Inventory of Skills Forum News2002-2003 Universities and Experiences Venice University  Audio Tapes
[IMAGE]	2002-2003  Universities and Experiences Open for Registration!
	 [IMAGE] Africa  Family Safari Experience, July 21-26 2002 http://www.myypo.org/africa2002  [IMAGE] Prague  University, October 6-12, 2002 http://www.myypo.org/prague2002  [IMAGE] India  University, January 26- February 2, 2003 http://www.myypo.org/india2003  [IMAGE] Morocco  Experience, April 23-28 2003 http://www.myypo.org/morocco2003  [IMAGE] Baltic  Family University at Sea, June 23-30, 2003  http://www.myypo.org/baltic2003
[IMAGE]	Regional  Conference 2001: A Southwest Odyssey
[IMAGE]	Enhance  your mind, body and spirit at the renowned Loews Ventana Canyon Resort.  Find out more about this Regional Conference, 2001:A Southwest Odyssey,  October 10-14, 2001 at http://www.ypo2001.com
[IMAGE]	2001  Fall Seminars
	 [IMAGE] Northwestern  Kellogg Presidents' Seminar. Class 2 of YPO's first year-long  program focuses on "Leading in the Next Economy." Four  sessions meet November 26-29, 2001; January 13-16, 2002; March 3-6,  2002; and, May 5-7, 2002. http://www.myypo.org/northwestern     [IMAGE] Retail  Industry Roundtable  Analyze web-based retailing and future consumer purchasing  patterns. Explore retail operation innovations, site selection,  winning store formats, merchandising, supply chain management, branding,  and human resources. September 12-14, 2001. http://www.myypo.org/retail    [IMAGE] Automotive  Aftermarket Industry Roundtable Discover from industry  experts and peers about consolidation trends, new distribution channels  and future distribution trends, re-manufacturing and the "new"  aftermarket. October 26-27, 2001. http://www.myypo.org/automotive       [IMAGE] Mergers,  Acquisitions & Finance Seminar Get the answers to the issues affecting your company's financing  choices. October 24-26, 2001. http://www.myypo.org/mergeracquisitionfinance     [IMAGE] YPO/PGA  Golf Seminar Explore the parallels between golf and business with fellow golfers  and industry leaders. Discover the management skills they have derived  through the game of golf at the PGA Learning Center in Port St.  Lucie, Florida. http://www.myypo.org/ypopga
[IMAGE]	New  YPO Public Web Site
[IMAGE]	 Check out the new  public web site, designed to provide additional information on YPO for  prospective members and others seeding YPO background. http://www.ypo.org
[IMAGE]	Inventory  of Skills
[IMAGE]	 The Inventory of  Skills is forming a new prostate cancer focus group, pairing members  who have battled this disease with members who are newly diagnosed.  For information, contact the Inventory of Skills at ios@usa.net
[IMAGE]	Forum  News
[IMAGE]	 For Forum Retreat  Planning visit http://www.myypo.org/forumretreat    Forum Retreat  Facilitators help create an agenda that addresses current concerns  and helps the forum progress to higher levels of communication: http://www.myypo.org/forumfacilitator
[IMAGE]	Venice  University  Audio Tapes
[IMAGE]	 Venice University  audio programs are now available in audiocassettes, MP3 files and audio  CDs. Please let us know your preferences while placing your order at  http://www.penfieldprod.com/ypo/
	 Please visit http://www.ypo.org  for additional  information on all YPO programs and services.  Directions on how to use the Web links: Hold your mouse pointer over the  link and left click on your mouse, opening your Web browser directly to  that link. If it does not connect you, open your Web browser and copy/paste  the link to the browser. Remember to have your YPO User ID and password  ready. If you do not have this information or have difficulties, please  contact the Global Services Center at 1-800-773-7976 or 1-972-650-4600.     If you  received this by fax, we do not have your email address on file. Please  contact the Global Services Center to update your member record.   Issue Twenty


Stuart,

Would you please send me your fax number so I can fax you the November 30th Trial Balance for RMT?

Thanks,
Susan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:53 PM
To:	Laborde, John; Musch, Susan; Zisman, Stuart
Subject:	RMT memo

 << File: RMT risk memo.dot >>

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


I think it would be OK, but you might want to check with Stan.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McCarty, Danny
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:09 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:

Rod,
     I had approved an offsite Happy Hour for our Market Services Group following our string of emergencies (about a $2500-$3000 expenditure).  Considering everything that has happened, we're reviewing all costs, whether previously approved or not, and cutting where we can.  This is one that I don't think I should pull unless you feel strongly that I should.  Let me know your thoughts.

Dan


WOW!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Marc Stewart <Stewart@Mallia.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:27 AM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don; 'Glenda Rosales'; 'Heather Zubke'; 'Reid Home'; 'Reid Work'; 'Vic Stewart'; 'Triolo, Tina'
Subject:	Mind if I drive into your house?

Here are some pics that Marc Kutner took of his house.  There was an
auto accident at the intersection in front of his house this weekend.
One of the vehicles was launched across his yard and into the wall of
his garage.  Nice.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Marc  Kutner
> Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 1:48 PM
> To:	Marc Stewart
> Subject:	Mind if I drive into your house?
>
>

 - hitter.jpg << File: hitter.jpg >>
 - hittee2.jpg << File: hittee2.jpg >>
 - hittee.jpg << File: hittee.jpg >>
 - damage3.jpg << File: damage3.jpg >>
 - damage2.jpg << File: damage2.jpg >>
 - damage.jpg << File: damage.jpg >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 01:51
PM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/27/99 01:38:04 PM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: REVISED ALREADY - CNG JAN 00 numbers

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/2000 01:44 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 01:43 PM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: REVISED ALREADY     - CNG JAN 00 numbers

Please up that to 2,300 dth's/day     starting   1 JAN 2000.

Thanks again!

---------------------- Forwarded by Heidi Boyd/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/27/99
02:41 PM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 02:41 PM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: CNG JAN 00 numbers

Hi Morgan,

Please schedule a daily total of 2095 to NYSEG off of CNG for Jan 2000.

Thanks!


I just wanted to say 'Hi!'.  I really enjoyed talking to you last night (and
every other night).  I hope you have a great day.

More later,

Errol McLaughlin


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001
03:09 PM ---------------------------

eserver@enron.com on 04/19/2001 04:04:09 PM
To: "Steven.J.Kean@enron.com" <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - RS041001

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Richard Shapiro
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: RS041001
Report Total: $10,108.31
Amount Due Employee: $10,108.31

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Kay, are we in London during this event?
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/19/2001
11:07 AM ---------------------------

Kerry Ferrari
02/14/2001 10:34 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EES Europe Night Out - 6th March 2001

Dave/Janet

If you are in Europe that week, I would really appreciate you both coming
along and showing us all how to line dance, (we hear you're both really good
at it).

Regards

Matthew
---------------------- Forwarded by Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT on 14/02/2001 16:33
---------------------------

	Calendar Entry

Brief description:
Date:
Time:

EES Europe Night Out @ Texas Embassy!!
06/03/2001
18:30 - 23:00

Detailed description:

EES Europe Team Event
On Tuesday 6th March @ 18.30
Mosey on down to the Texas Embassy

For Line Dancing with a Live band, Food & Drink

Texas Embassy
1 Cockspur Street
Trafalgar Square
London SW1Y 5DL

Please accept this invite, if you intend to come.

Invitations have been sent to: Enron Europe EES Group
_________________________________________________________________________
Chairperson: Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT


As requested by Mark.
---------------------- Forwarded by Philip Davies/LON/ECT on 27/07/2000 14:05
---------------------------

Philip Davies
25/07/2000 17:49
To: Poland
cc:

Subject: URE Statement on Criteria for Lifting Tariff Approval Requirements

The President of the Regulatory Authority has recently issued a 3-page
statement, outlining the criteria he will take into account in assessing
whether to release companies (ie, generators and trading companies) from the
tariff approval requirements in the Polish Energy Law.  We may arrive at a
situation later this year where we have signed the necessary transmission,
balancing and settlement contract(s) with PSE so that we can do wholesale
trades -but are still subject to the requirement to get our trades (sales,
not purchases) "approved" by URE before we can conclude them.

The URE statement and recent press comments by the regulator do not give us
any grounds to believe that traders such as Enron are going to be released
soon from this requirement (in the press he has talked about possibly
releasing some generators from the requirement in early 2001).  We may
therefore need to investigate getting an "approved tariff".  However, unless
we can get a framework agreement in place (so we don't need to get each and
every transaction separately approved), this does not appear to be a workable
solution.

The attached statement is unhelpful in that it appears to be simply a list of
every conceivable reason that URE could want to use at some point to justify
continuing with the current restrictions.  While some (but far from all) of
the issues raised are genuine concerns, it does not of course follow that
requiring tariffs to be approved for all generators and traders is the right
response.  (In October 1999 we presented to URE the reasons why we believe
that these requirements make no sense for a new entrant supplier such as
Enron.)

However, since this issue is unlikely to go away, Jarek D. and I plan to use
this statement to develop a dialogue with URE and see if we can find a
workable way forward.

Regards,
Philip

URE definition of  "competitive market" which must exist before he can
consider lifiting the requirements:

"The Authority,s President defines the competitive market as a market where
the transaction price is determined as a result of free interplay between
supply and demand, and the customer has the right to choose the supplier
without restraint, and to change it without excessive costs to himself, as
well as being able to decide the quantity of purchases. Each of the subjects
on the competitive market functions within similar external conditions. The
transactions concluded on this market are subject to civil and legal
regulations, or customary ones, and the information regarding the prices of
goods on offer are generally accessible. The President of the URE estimates
that as far as electric power is concerned, a supplier,s market rather than a
competitive market is still in operation, because the customers are not able
to exert economic pressure where their preferences are taken into account."


You'll be pleased to know that I registered over the web version of telebears
this morning.  If there's anything else, please don't hesitate.

Best,
Jeff


Please read below and make sure that those post id sheets are handed in every
day.
Note the people the email was sent to.

Thanks
Dutch

---------------------- Forwarded by Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 09:19
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jeffrey C Gossett                           10/20/2000 08:43 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT (bcc: Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT)
Subject: V@R

Sally -

These are the steps that we have taken to insure that the positions the V@R
engine picks up are correct:

1. Each book adm. now checks his/her own positions that are going into V@R,
rather than just one check at  a consolidated level.
2. All regional controllers will receive a sheet at the end of the night,
verifying that all books are officialized.


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 10/11/2000 04:56
PM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 10/11/2000 05:31:35 PM
To: <peter.bray@att.net>, <JBarthrop@electric.com>, <MNelson@electric.com>,
<RSchlanert@electric.com>, <mpetroch@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<athomas@newenergy.com>, <bchen@newenergy.com>, <kmagruder@newpower.com>,
<Jeff.Hanson@phaser.com>, <AWeller@sel.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>,
<ben.reyes@utility.com>
cc:
Subject: Edison and PG&E Emergency Motions - - - ALJ Ruling Just Issued

Last week you were sent an email which discussed the October 4 emergency
motions of Edison and PG&E to modify the end of rate freeze decisions.?  On
October 5, Edison filed an ex parte request for the immediate suspension of
the effective date of portions of D.99-10-057 and D.00-03-058.??On  October
6, PG&E filed its support of Edison,s request for immediate  suspension of
the effective dates of the decisions. The motions were filed  because of the
significant undercollections which are being accumulated in their  purchased
power accounts.
?
A ruling has just been issued by ALJ Minkin which directs parties to file
responses to Edison,s and PG&E,s ex parte requests for immediate suspension
of certain portions of D.99-10-057 and D.00-03-058.? The judge says, "In
effect, Edison and PG&E have moved for a stay of certain aspects of these
decisions.? Consistent with Rule 45(f), responses to motions must be filed
and served within 15 days of the date that the motion was served, unless the
administrative law judge sets a different date.? Therefore, responses to
Edison,s and PG&E,s requests must be filed and served by October 20,  2000."
?
She also notes that the utilities' financial information must be provided  by
October 17 and provides that, "Parties have the opportunity to comment on
the  financial information provided by the utilities and the emergency
petitions  (including the amended petitions) by October 30."
?
This suggests that the filing due on the 20th could be primarily  procedural,
dealing with the propriety of the Commission issuing a stay of  previously
approved decisions.? The filing on the 30th would then deal with  the
substance of the emergency requests, as well as making any comments on the
financial data provided by the utilities.? This would provide more time to
review the financial data and work out the details of any "counter proposal"
which ARM might want to make.? However, we could also deal with substantive
issues in the 10/20 filing.? We should discuss this soon and determine what
course ARM would like to pursue.
?
A copy of the ruling is attached for your information.
?
Dan
 - ALJ Ruling 0f 10-11-00.doc


Please add Lisa Bills, Chris Herron and Mitch Robinson.  You have Lisa's info
on the GE list.

Thanks,

Kay


Any questions, please call 3-5962

Randy Janzen


Brock sausage dog here we come


I had the call anyway with Mike and Steve.  We actually made progress in
outlining the issues.  Mike should be generating an email.  We voted to take
next week off. Hope that's ok.

Kay

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 12/21/2000 04:34 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: GE

Sorry I missed the call.  I was up to eyeballs in PSCO and caught in a very
COLD and NASTY blizzard in Toronto in my little suit and heels!  I'm trying
to get home.  Maybe tomorrow.


Stopped by Em's last night before coming home and she'd mentioned trying to do Austin this weekend.  She'd already talked to Katy and it sounded like Katy was interested in Austin tomorrow night and then maybe Gruene on Saturday night.  Anyway, wanted to let you know and see if you had any interest.  Emily and Katy would probably try to leave early tomorrow to stop in Round Top and do some antique shopping...so, if you think you could leave the office around 5:00 or so (of course earlier is always better) we could ride together and at least get on the HOV lane.  As it stands right now I think we're going to have stay in hotels both nights and we of course currently have no reservations, so it could get interesting.

Sue


Katherine Falk
185 John Street
Oakland, CA 94611
kjfalk@womeninit.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Katherine Falk


In order to complete the approved list of counterparties fo the new online
trading system I need a list of master agreements you have negotiated that do
not have all the necessary representations (e.g. trade option exemption) and
definition references to permit trading energy commodity derivatives.  Friday
noon would be soon enough.

Thanks,

Mark


Hi John,

I left you a voice mail, but thought I'd try email as well.

The language that they added to paragraph 6 raises some issues since they
want to restrict ENA and its affiliates from future potential transactions.
Please call me at your convenience to discuss.

Thanks,

Kay

John Llodra
05/09/2001 03:10 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: CA for Island End Project and Meeting Scheduled for 5/15/01

Kay/Kathleen

Please see Ameresco's attached markup of our 2-way CA.  If you would like a
redline please let me know and I can see if they can send one.  We have a
meeting next Tuesday and will need to begin to share info prior to that, so I
would like to get this wrapped up as soon as possible.  Thanks so much for
your help

Regards
John

---------------------- Forwarded by John Llodra/Corp/Enron on 05/09/2001
04:08 PM ---------------------------

"Barba, Doug" <dbarba@ameresco.com> on 05/09/2001 02:19:36 PM
To: "'john.llodra@enron.com'" <john.llodra@enron.com>
cc: "Corrsin, David" <dcorrsin@ameresco.com>, "Wallis, Peter"
<pwallis@ameresco.com>

Subject: CA for Island End Project and Meeting Scheduled for 5/15/01

John,

Attached is a CA that Ameresco is prepared to sign.? Once Enron has reviewed,
then I will send 2 signed CA's with one original returned to Ameresco.? The
meeting is confirmed with Joe Murphy at Cabot.? I believe he will have one or
more people attend the meeting and he has asked the names of persons that
will be attending.? Please let me know who from Houston besides yourself will
be at the meeting.? I also want to have a conference call with Gil or Dave
plus yourself to discuss strategy prior to us getting together next week.

 <<Enron Bilateral CA Draft 2 by Ameresco 050901.doc>>

Doug Barba
Executive Vice President
Ameresco Inc.
111 Speen Street
Framingham, MA? 01701
Phone: 508-661-2238
Fax: 508-661-2201
E-mail: dbarba@ameresco.com

 - Enron Bilateral CA Draft 2 by Ameresco 050901.doc


I obviously didn't get up this morning to work-out...So I was wondering if
you wanted to go for a run before Felicity tonight.  I should be home by 6:30
or 7:00.  Let me know.


IMqasqas@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hours beginning 16:00-17:00 in the January 11,
2002 Real-Time Market.

Prices in the January 12, 2002 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm

Ibrahim Mqasqas,
Market Monitoring and Performance,
NYISO


Detailed Functional specs are available in o:\eol\phase2