FYI - see message below re: our potential trip to Mexico City on 5/21.  We're
pushing to get the meetings back to back but you know how politicians can
be.  Will keep you posted.  If the meetings can NOT be back to back would you
want to consider taking one of the smaller company jets?  Your call, I can
work either way.

---------------------- Forwarded by Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001
05:16 PM ---------------------------

<Eric_Bradley@mckinsey.com> on 05/11/2001 02:24:08 PM
To: <Randal.Maffett@enron.com>
cc: Thomas_Seitz@mckinsey.com, Beth.A.Ryan@enron.com
Subject: Update on PMI/Ministry of Finance Meeting

Randy:

I just spoke with Pedro regarding the Ministry of Finance Meeting in Mexico
City.  He is hopeful (but not certain) that we can schedule a meeting on
the back end of the PMI session.  I suggest you and Mike continue to keep
the entire day open at this point.   If it turns out that the Ministry of
Finance meeting will be later in the day, Pedro can shuttle you and Mike to
our Mexico City office where you may access phones, desks, etc. during the
interim.

You will most likely meet with the Director General of Credit who is
responsible for managing fx, and financial credit with the international
markets.  He's in a very influential position within the Finance Ministry.

Let me know if you need any additional info at this point. Otherwise, we'll
review the Ministry of Finance document and Maya pricing concepts on
Tuesday, 15th, at 9 am here in our office.

Regards, Eric

+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| This message may contain confidential and/or privileged     |
| information.  If you are not the addressee or authorized to |
| receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,     |
| disclose or take any action based on this message or any    |
| information herein.  If you have received this message in   |
| error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail |
| and delete this message.  Thank you for your cooperation.   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+


Joe,

Based on our discussions, the facts are as follows: Prior to 12/2/01,
ENA sold gas to One Oak.  During the period 12/4-12/31/01, Duke Field
Services inadvertently flowed gas on the MRT pipeline to ENA. ENA used
the gas received from Duke Field Services to fulfill its obligations
under the sales agreement to One Oak.

ENA is obligated to pay Duke Field Services for the gas it received and
later delivered to One Oak because this event occurred post-petition and
benefited ENA.

Shemin


Either the location, or the number of locations has changed on revision number 7. The hedge associated with this deal needs to be re-evaluated.


Hello --

I just wanted to confirm that the work of the PRRQ has been suspended until
further notice.  (At a minimum the meetings in April will not take place.)
In April, the RTO West Stage 2 Development Process will focus on congestion
management, contract conversion, liability issues, and limited seams work
(although there might some other isolated activity as well).

Thanks!  I look forward to when the PRRQ restarts!  Kristi

"Kristi M. Wallis" wrote:

> To Members of the RTO West Provisions and Requirements Content Group:
>
> Hello!
>
> As you may already know, at last Friday's meeting, the RRG agreed that
> the RTO West process should refocus its efforts over the next few weeks
> on, at a minimum, congestion management and pricing.  Just what that
> means for the other content groups is unclear, although it is possible
> that some will continue and others will be put on hold until critical
> congestion management and pricing decisions are made.  The Coordinating
> Team is preparing a recommendation and participants will be informed
> about the changes to the work plan and schedule in the near future.
>
> I think it is likely that the work of the Provisions and Requirements
> Content Group will be put on hold for some time, and that the April
> 17-18 retreat will be rescheduled.  That said, you should wait until you
> receive the final word on the schedule before you change your plans.
>
> I will keep you posted.
>
> Take care!  Kristi


For your information.  The outcome was great for TW because the Cal. PUC
adopted our receipt point proposal, eliminating the danger of mandated
restriction of TW's deliveries to the California border.  The outcome is not
so great for Enron overall because they rejected our proposed settlement.
The receipt point proposal was able to survive since it was part of both of
the competing settlements.
I'm still trying to get thru the whole order; let me know if you have
questions.
S.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 11/27/2000
09:20 AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/22/2000 06:28 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Bad Proposed Decision

Well, this shows the direction in which the "new" Commission is heading.  The
very good news, though, is that  TW's proposal was included in both
settlements (now that's hedging!).  Thus,  the benefits to TW were preserved
under both proposals.  Congratulations.  That's fantastic--hard work that
paid off.

We will of course express out extreme dissappointment with the PD, and point
out that this decision condemns California to a 20th century infrastructure,
when the state's 21st century economy demands much, much better.

We should discuss.  Since the PD empowers the likes of Norm and Florio, it
will be important to play very close attention to implementation of Hector.

Sorry to have to be the one to deliver the news.   But we have a knack of
making lemonade out of lemons and we'll do out best to do the same here,
whatever turns up at the end.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/22/2000 05:53 PM -----

	Michael.Alexander@sce.com
	11/22/2000 05:27 PM

		 To: Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com, tomb@crossborderenergy.com, burkee@cts.com,
craigc@calpine.com, rick.counihan@greenmountain.com, jdasovic@enron.com,
MDay@GMSSR.com, Douglas.Porter@sce.com
		 cc: Colin.Cushnie@sce.com, INGGM@sce.com
		 Subject:

The PD in the Gas Restructuring is out.   I have yet to read the whole
thing, but the title "Approval With Modifications Of The Interim
Settlement..." does not bode well.  According to Steve Watson (and I only
have Steve's statement second hand), the decision reflects a fear that the
timing is wrong in light of the current volatile gas price market.

(See attached file: Proposed.doc)

--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
626-302-2029
626-302-3254 (fax)

 - Proposed.doc


Anne C Koehler
	01/25/2001 02:51 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Could you please send me an updated version of the due diligence list with
the Client Soft and Art Squad contracts on the list?  Thanks

Anne C. Koehler
Sr. Counsel, ENA
EB 3839
713-853-3448


Hi Niclas,

I am in the middle of preparing some presentations right now, so it might be
more productive to speak by phone (503-464-8430).  Please leave your number,
if you get my voicemail.

To get you started, you might see if you can get access to the FERC GADS
database of plant forced and planned availability.  It seems others in
Research have asked about this, so you may already have this at your
disposal.  The EIA has a good electronic database of plant FOR and POR
available for free (http://www.nerc.com/~esd/).  I know Alexios in RE/EES has
this.  If you wanted to do it the hard way, you can also ask Jaison to access
the EPA's CEMS data he has summarized on a machine there in Research.  It
contains hourly plant operation for every unit over about 50MW, which you
could aggregate up.

The WSCC 10-year forecast of new plant construction and loads is a good place
to start for plant construction information, but suffers from some notorious
"self-reporting" error.  It is available in pdf form from the web site
http://www.wscc.com/.  Other sources that should be more near-term, but more
accurate are the CEC inventory of plants (http://www.energy.ca.gov/) and the
BPA Whitebook (http://www.transmission.bpa.gov).

As far as basic economic data is concerned, you can either rely on the
reported utility forecasts for loads, or you can go to fundamental data.  The
ultimate source of the census data collected by the US Dept of Commerce,
which you can buy on CDROM for cheap.  It would have this kind of information
by SIC code, by ZIP code.  You may also have access to one of the economic
forecasting businesses (Wharton's WEFA, DRI, etc.)  They have this in highly
digested and complete form.

BTW, Tim Heizenrader, who runs Fundamental Analysis and Research on the West
Desk, is a sharp cookie and should have all this under control.  Is your
client aware of this resource?

Give me a buzz and we can talk more,
Michael

>>> Niclas Egmar/HOU/EES@ENRON 08/14/00 12:49PM >>>
Michael,

I'm an analyst in the research group. I would like your help with finding
some information specific for the West Coast. A new analyst on the West Power
desk needs information on planned outages and planned new generation. He is
studying the long-term fundamentals of electricity volatility on the West
Coastso so he also needs info on housing starts, computer sales or industrial
production figures for computer manufacturing, growth of start-up companies,
and population stats.

Any help in finding the needed info would be greatly appreciated. Contact me
or Daniel Kang (new analyst).

Niclas
 - TEXT.htm


I need for you, or the Producer Services group, to determine if you think the
gas will flow for the month and at what price.  I will use your decision for
our bidweek postion.

D

Vance L Taylor
01/25/2001 11:53 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Basin Production from GA 213

FYI,

How would you want to handle for February nomination?

vlt
x3-6353
---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
11:55 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brad Blevins                           01/25/2001 10:56 AM

To: John Peyton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve -HPL- Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Flavin/GCO/Enron@Enron, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Buck
Thomas/GCO/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Basin Production from GA 213

I have reviewed the gas composition analysis from SPL of the Basin production
from GA 213.  While SPL's analysis does show a dewpoint of around 20 degrees
F at 400 psig, it is both my and John Handley's opinion that the gas from the
wellbore had stratified by the time that this sample was taken.  We expect
the dewpoint of the flowing gas to be higher.  However, this was the best
sample that could be obtained at the time.  We have conferred with Steve
Schneider and we are willing to take this gas on a conditional basis over the
next couple of days.  Once the 6" line has been pigged, the production flows
stablilized and Mitchell's conditioning equipment lined out over the next
couple of days, HMS will need to take another sample at the meter run and
have SPL run an extended analysis with a dewpoint curve on an expedited
basis.  Should this sample indicate a dewpoint over 45 degrees F, then this
production will be shut in again until hydrocarbon dewpoint conditioning
equipment has been installed.  In the meantime, HMS needs to keep a close
watch on all Southern Union city gates on Galveston Island to monitor for
liquids fallout.


TIM

Now that we have so much time on our hands.......Please send me a list of
products, terms and bid/offer spreads that we can negotiate for EOL.


So whats the bet for the game on Wednesday?


Stephanie, please send a one page one line note to Bear, Morgan and Goldman
informing them of the addition.

Sara, for your interest, note the addition.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Stephanie Panus
	03/29/2001 01:55 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Theresa T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Addi to transfer of funds authorization for ENA

No problem to add him to the list.

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	03/29/2001 01:46 PM

		 To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Addi to transfer of funds authorization for ENA

Stephanie, can you make this change?

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
----- Forwarded by Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001 01:45 PM -----

	Theresa T Brogan@ECT
	03/29/2001 11:51 AM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Addi to transfer of funds authorization for ENA

Cheryl,
 We would like to add David Vitrella as an authorized signatory for the
commercial side on transfer of funds for ENA .  He is currently on the
authorized list for ECT Investments.  Please let me know what you need from
me to make this happen.

Thanks,
Theresa


Attached is a first draft of a letter agreement relating to the LM 6000/Coral
transaction.  Please let me know ASAP if you have any comments.

Thanks,

Kay


Read about the two new FERC Commissioners.

Also in this issue:
California update and the PG&E bankruptcy
Transwestern's Arizona expansion
Fortune smiles on Enron
Annuity effects -- what's that?
The U.K. gets new energy rules

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then click eBiz and "eBiz April 13, 2001."


Thanks for all your hard work and Happy Birthday!

Lunch will be provided on Friday, March 16, by Tim Belden and Chris Calger to
everyone on the floor as a thanks for all you've done for Enron this month.
We'll also celebrate this month's birthdays by having sweet treats for
everyone.


Gerald,
	here is the update I did with Barb's 2nd mark-up comments last week.
	Customer has not seen these changes but they are for future reference.
	mk


I have attached the interview schedule/evaluation form and resume for the
Friday, December 15, 2000 interview with Kalen Pieper for the Vice President,
Human Resources position # 106788. Please let me know if this schedule
conflicts with any new appointments, as soon as possible.

Thank you,

Andria Stevens
EES Human Resources


The attached table contains a cost update for 2001 spending.

George C. Robinson, PE
Contract Environmental Engineer
Cypress Engineering
ENRON Office: (713) 646-7327
ENRON email: george.robinson@enron.com


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/09/2000 04:05
PM ---------------------------

"Raper, Stephen" <RAPER@ci.rocky-mount.nc.us> on 08/07/2000 01:28:37 PM
To: "'ozzie.pagan@enron.com'" <ozzie.pagan@enron.com>, "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'"
<Kay.Mann@enron.com>, "'Heather.Kroll@enron.com'" <Heather.Kroll@enron.com>,
"'jhodge@enron.com'" <jhodge@enron.com>
cc: "'jep rose'" <jrose@poynerspruill.com>, "Sherk, Bill"
<SHERK@ci.rocky-mount.nc.us>, "Nixon, Nancy M."
<NIXONN@ci.rocky-mount.nc.us>, "'joe durham'" <joed@co.edgecombe.nc.us>

Subject: FW: Enron schedules

attached are two possible schedules/timelines for annexation and rezoning.
let me know your preference and/or any new ideas or alternatives for the
property in edgecombe county for the peaking plant

steve raper

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nixon, Nancy M.
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 12:17 PM
> To: Raper, Stephen
> Subject: Enron schedules
>
>  <<Zoning Notes & schedules.doc>>

 - Zoning Notes & schedules.doc


Stephanie Panus, Senior Legal Specialist, will be joining ENA Legal on August
7 and will be supported by Becky Tlucek.  Stephanie will report to Mark
Taylor and will be located in EB3806.  Please welcome Stephanie to ENA Legal.


Steve;
David asked me to forward this to you, per your voice mail.  In addition, we will provide each Corporate Policy Committee rep with a list of those MD's they will be responsible for representing.

Please don't hesitate to contact me should you have any additional questions or concerns.

Gina


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/20/2000 06:12 PM -----

	"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
	12/20/2000 04:38 PM

		 To: Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com, shari.stack@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: PGE default warnings issued

fyi

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

=20
Wednesday December 20, 4:56 pm Eastern Time
Calif. utilities risk imminent default, S&P warns
(UPDATE: Recasts, adds details, background. Adds byline)

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK, Dec 20 (Reuters) - Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and Southern =
California Edison are at grave risk of default and bankruptcy within =
weeks, and are likely to see their high credit ratings fall to low junk =
grades if they do not get regulatory help by Friday, credit rating agency =
Standard & Poor's said on Wednesday.

``S&P is prepared to take dramatic rating action,'' said Richard Cortright,=
 an S&P analyst, in a conference call. ``The ratings are expected to drop =
deeply into speculative grade to reflect the likelihood of imminent =
default.''

The agency assessed the situation as the California Public Utilities =
Commission prepared to meet Thursday to consider whether to allow Pacific =
G&E and Southern California Edison to pass on at least some of their =
skyrocketing wholesale electricity costs to consumers.

Shares of PG&E Corp.(NYSE:PCG - news), the parent of Pacific G&E, closed =
Wednesday on the New York Stock Exchange at $20-15/16, down $1-7/16, or =
6.42 percent. Shares of Edison International (NYSE:EIX - news), the parent =
of Southern California Edison, closed at $17-7/8, down $1-1/8, or 5.92 =
percent.

The utilities operate under a rate freeze through March 2002, and are also =
unable to negotiate long-term supply contracts. These factors expose them =
to the vagaries of the volatile spot power market.

Wholesale power recently cost more than $1,400 per megawatt hour, a more =
than 40-fold increase over the $35 per megawatt hour rate last year.

California imposed the rate freeze as part of its deregulation of the =
utilities sector, which was intended to promote competition and consumer =
choice.

Among the options the commission has to remedy the situation are a hike in =
the utilities' price caps.

Even that, however, would constitute a ``band-aid on a bullet wound,'' =
said Ron Barone, who leads S&P's utility group and also participated in =
the conference call.

Californians have already been warned to cut back their energy use, and =
that they may be subject to rolling blackouts.

Cortright said unless the commission offers the utilities significant =
regulatory relief, Pacific G&E and Southern California Edison will be =
dependent on the capital markets for cash infusions, if any are available.

``There are bills that are coming due in January and February,'' he said. =
``We would be naive to think that the capital markets are going to open =
their doors to satisfy (their needs) in the current environment.''

``To be frank,'' he added, ``we are amazed that events have been permitted =
to reach anywhere near this critical stage. It truly is unfathomable. We =
really do need some emergency actions taken now.''

Pacific G&E last completed a big bond sale in October, selling $1.35 =
billion of bonds. Southern California Edison and its parent, Edison =
International, sold an equivalent amount in early November.

Both companies carry ``A-plus'' corporate credit ratings and ``single-A'' =
senior unsecured debt ratings. Pacific G&E's secured debt carries an =
``AA-minus'' rating. Those ratings are considered mid to high investment =
grades.

One trader said Southern California Edison's debt began on Tuesday being =
quoted by price, like junk bonds, instead of by the extra yield they offer =
relative to similar maturity U.S. Treasuries, like investment-grade bonds.

Its 5.875 percent notes maturing in September 2004 were quoted Wednesday =
at about 87 cents on the dollar, yielding about 11.3 percent to maturity. =
No price quotation was immediately available on Pacific G&E's debt.=20


Unfortunately, I will miss your farewell at Slick Willie's on January 3rd.  I
am sorry that I won't be able to drink a beer with you as a send off, but
perhaps we can have one in London later in January as your welcome to
London.  I will be in Miami on January 3rd, hopefully celebrating an Oklahoma
win in the Orange Bowl earlier that day.  David found us tickets to the
game.  Not great seats, but they are in the stadium.  Hey, it's not UT, but
it should still be fun to go.

I will miss you and your wit and constructive cynisism in Houston.  But I
know that I can count on you to be just as vocal from London!  I plan to be
there at least quarterly in 2001, and will definitely welcome your first hand
observations on operational areas that may need attention.  Hopefully between
e:mail and voice mail we can definitely keep in touch.

Tell Ann that I hope that this will be a great adventure for her and the
whole family.  I think that it is a wonderful time in your children's lives
to give them this experience.    Have fun -- and set them straight!!


thanks!  so do you know whether this has been forwarded to Cristina and Bev's
office?? did you talk to them directly??

I'm wondering if I should call them to follow-up?
Let me know what you think,
Thanks again,
Joseph


I would assume so.


The graduate has to buy drinks for all of her unemployed friends!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jessica Wentworth [mailto:jwentwor@du.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Bierbach, Brian; Varnell, Charles; Bump, Dan J.; Baldridge, Don;
Choyce, Ken; Whitt, Mark; mike.legler@enron.com; paul.lucci@enron.com;
Sitter, Scott; Harrison, Tyrell
Subject: SCHOOLS OUT!!!

I'm done!!  I'm all done!!  Remember when I left you guys a message after
having my eyes done?  Well this is the same feeling.  It's just so great, I
had to share it with all of you.  It's a tremendous feeling.  I can't stop
smiling.  Thanks for all your help on my many little projects for school.

Talk to you guys later.  Take care,

Jess


request_number:  DS-PP:012
firstname:  Peter
lastname:  Richardson
e-mail:  peter@richardsonandoleary.com
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JCG-01 and -02
page_numbers:
request_text:  Please disclose and/or produce any and all communications from
October 16, 2000 to the present, between any of the party representatives
listed below and any representative of BPA concerning rates to be in effect
for BPA's Fiscal Years 2002-2006, the interactions of such rates and customer
contracts, or procedural aspects of rate these proceedings.

Terry Mundorf (WPAG)
Lon Peters (PGP)
Linc Wolverton (ICNU)
Scott Brattebo (PacifiCorp)
Kevin Clark (Seattle City Light)
David Hoff (PSE)
Geoff Carr (Northwest Requirements Utilities)
Dennis Parrish (Market Access Coalition Group)
Pam Jacklin (PacifiCorp)
Peter Richardson (PPC)
Kyle Sciuchetti (PPC)
Ray Kindley (PGP)
Jay Waldron (PGP)
Doug Brawley (PNGC)
Eric Johnson (PNGC)
Darcy Norville (PGE)
Lynn Williams (PGE)
Steve Weiss (Northwest Energy Coalition)
Mark Hellman (OPUC)

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below. With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel). For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

 With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form. For such communications, "disclose
and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce" any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph. For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

response_text:  The Public Power Council (PPC) objects to this Data Request
on the grounds that it (i) seeks information that is not relevant; (ii) seeks
information that is privileged; and (iii) seeks information that is unduly
burdensome to produce. Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section
1010.8(b). PPC further objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it is
in improper form as it does not cite to specific testimony or indicate the
specific use to which the information sought will be put. Special Rules of
Practice, WP-02-01. Without waiving the foregoing objections, PPC responds as
follows:

Please see attached.  Note all the attachments appear to also be responsive
to DS-PP:010 and DS-PP:011.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  dsl226.usw-1-224.pacifier.com
3.  Remote IP Address:  207.202.224.226
4.  Form URL:
https://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.76 [en] (Win95; U)


Attached is a revised version of the Posting Agreement.  Unfortunately, the
redline against the version sent to us by S&C shows practically the entire
agreement as brand new text (instead of showing changes to the old text), so
it will not be particularly helpful to review a redline.

The changes to S&C's draft are extensive, but most changes are added
definitions, termination rights, representations and warranties, and the like
-- the provisions regarding how the platforms work together and how contracts
are entered into are essentially the same.

Let me know how you want to proceed with your review of this draft -- I'm
happy to discuss it with you before your review if you want..

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Dear Clickpaper Customers

This is an exciting time at Clickpaper.com.  We are ecstatic to report that
our online trading platform is off to a very successful start.  Since our
launch on July 25, 2000, we have completed over $700 million in both physical
and financial transactions.  This represents over 1.1 million tons of pulp
and paper products and over 22 million board feet of wood products.  We
appreciate your business and are constantly developing new products and
services to help you manage your business.

New enhancements include:

New Site Design  - We have redesigned the look and functionality of the
website.  In addition, the trade floor has been significantly  redesigned to
increase the number of products that can be viewed at one time.
European Product Launch - On January 30, we expanded our product offering to
include over 20 European financial products.  We have also added resources to
our pulp trading business in Europe and will be expanding our physical online
offering in the near future.
New Physical Products
 a. Lumber - 60 day fixed priced framing lumber and structural panels in the
Houston and Dallas hubs.
 b. Newsprint - 1 year fixed price physical newsprint in our East newsprint
hub.
 c. Market Pulp - 3rd market hub for NBSK has been added in South Paris,
Maine.  This complements the existing market hubs in    Vancouver and
Rotterdam.
 d. Recovered Fiber - Next week, we will launch several West Coast market
hubs in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle, in
  addition to the export hub in Long Beach Harbor.

As always, our Clickpaper team stands ready to answer your questions and hear
your feedback at 1-800-986-3837 or +44 (0)20 7783-3434.  Log on today to our
new and improved site at www.clickpaper.com.  As always, our marketing staff
is available to provide you training for Clickpaper and information on Enron,
s business model.

Sincerely

Clickpaper Marketing Team

This advertisement has been issued and approved by Enron Europe Finance and
Trading Limited which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Authority
(SFA) in the conduct of investment business. The services/products/contracts
referred to on this website are intended only for commercial enterprises and
not for private customers as defined by the rules of SFA. Enron will not
enter into transactions with persons who would be regarded as private
customers under the rules of SFA


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001 11:44
AM ---------------------------
From: Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/01/2001 11:33 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, William Fleenor/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Roseann Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Bills/ENRON@enronXgate,
Catherine Clark/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: form of option

See comments therein.  We should discuss presentation.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Manis, Herman; Fleenor, William
Cc: Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa; Clark, Catherine
Subject: form of option

Here's the long awaited form of option for your review and comment.

 << File: FORM - Option to Purchase Real Estate (Kay's revisions2).doc >>

I'm sending it to Rose, Lisa and Catherine for their review also.

Thanks,

Kay


It's good to hear from you even though you wrote to the wrong nephew.  How's everything going in the big H.  School is going pretty well, my classes are going pretty well except one that really sucks bad.  Tell everyone I said Hello.  I look forward to seeing everyone at Thanksgiving, I'll relay the message to Brad.
Brandon


Everyone,

If you have some time today, go to http://tags.dev.corp.enron.com to look at the menu and sub-menus.  Just mouse over the main items to get a drop down of the sub-menus.  Keep in mind that we'll discuss the TAGS homepage tomorrow.  Think about other color options if you don't like the current one.  If you're considering a legal disclaimer in place of the Latin text, please come up with a draft disclaimer.

See you all tomorrow at 10am.

Sheri Luong
Corporate Systems Development
Enron Net Works
ECN1831C
(713) 345-3553


Tana:

Neither Midstream Energy Marketing INc. nor Resource Strategies LLC is
authorized to trade US power products.  Both CPs were restricted by legal.

Leslie


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000
04:04 PM ---------------------------

"Lucy Gonzalez" <stagecoachmama@hotmail.com> on 12/05/2000 08:34:54 AM
To: pallen@enron.com
cc:
Subject:

Phillip,
       How are you and how is everyone? I sent you the rent roll #27 is
moving out and I wknow that I will be able to rent it real fast.All I HAVE
TO DO IN there is touch up the walls .Four adults will be moving in @130.00
a wk and 175.00 deposit they will be in by Thursday or Friday.
                                       Thank You , Lucy

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

 - rentroll_1201.xls


Please see the attached revised form of opinion for HQ.  Since we will not
require HQ joinder of Master, I revised the opinion to reflect its primary
coverage of the Guaranty.  I believe this will clarify the opinion matters
for this mornings discussions.  Mary

Please forward as necessary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


A non-corp password request has been made for 'James.D.Steffes@enron.com'

Your non-corp password for eRequest is '6067'.  (Without quotes)

To use this password, go to the eRequest website ( http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/Entry/ ) and click on non-Corp logon.  Type in your email address and the password above and click the 'LOG IN' button to log on to eRequest.

To submit feedback on eRequest, go to the FeedBack page at http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/Feedback/.


Hey!!  You still exist!!


Christine Homsey
3166 Dean Court
Minneapolis, MN 55416
chrishomsey@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Christine Homsey


Ken, I found your card with your email address  on it when I was sorting
through
my filing cabinet. I decided to say  "Hi". Tears still pop in my eyes when I
think
about your Dad he was so very special to me. For  my sake I wish he could
have
lived forever but for his sake I'm glad he  didn't. I kept working for Kelly
Assisted Living for a year or more in family  practice clinics etc so I
wouldn't get too attached
I guess. I then went to work  at Boone Hospital on the cardiology ward for
about
6 wks and decided I didn't like that. So I'm now working at a  nursing home
in
Salisbury -- and I like this better, other than they are too  short of help
and I work
a lot of hours. The old people are still my preference and I  must want to
get involved
with them and really know them. But your Dad will always be  the really
special one.
I just wanted to say hi and thanks for giving me the  opportunity to take
care of him.
Sincerely, Marilyn Hurt
?
?
?


Thanks for your note.  I came through pretty much OK but my garage was flooded and my house turned into a little island there for a few hours.


I would have jumped yesterday but couldn't figure out how to get my window
open.  Since I'm on the 7th floor and the snowdrift goes up to the 4th, it
wouldn't have done much good anyway.  Know of any good part time jobs--I need
to supplement the ole' retirement plan!  df


Talked to Dave.  In a nut shell, here are the problem areas in the bill as he
sees it.  It was a very brief conversation, but I think I've captured the key
points:
Based on an expectation that the "expedited siting" bill would help site
plants, Dave's group had six plants on the drawing board.

The 5 ppm requirement kills 4 of the 6, i.e., the 4 can't meet the 5 ppm
requirement.
The requirement that the plants would either be 1) shut down after 3 years or
2) replaced with a combined-cycle plant kills the other 2 because a) shutting
down the plants in 3 years kills the economics, and b) the sites for the two
LM-6000s can't accomodate combined cylces (i.e., Dave couldn't get siting).
In addition,the generator would be required to sign an exclusive with the ISO
(which the EOB would have to approve), which takes away the optionality of
going to the market, thus killing the economics.
On the labor side, it's complicated, but in essence, by requiring that "...it
be shown that the applicant has a contract with a general contractor and has
contracted for an adequate supply of skilled labor to construct, operate, and
maintain the plant,"
it forces Dave to negotiate a labor deal before he knows what the project is
(i.e, before the project has been approved), and,
it effectively prevents Enron from having the option to use internal
resources (this issue is very specific to Enron; I can explain more if folks
prefer).

In short, bullets 1-3 would seem to affect both Enron and the market, while
the last bullet is, according to Dave, very Enron specific.  Point 2 in
bullet 4, according to Dave is sensitive and should not be made public.

If any questions, let me know.  Bruno has emailed the price cap and the
"general-funds-to-help-finance-the-cap" bills, and faxed the siting bill.

Best,
Jeff


Please see the attacheed file for adjustments to be made in July.  Call me if
you have any questions.

Thanks!


I never wrote nor implied that I was intending to hedge currency exposure with a third party.  I implied that I will hedge with you guys when and where I deem appropriate in the term structure.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 12:31 PM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:

John,

I don't have all the facts around this transaction, but I don't think you are authorized to hedge currency exposure with outside counterparties as you've outlined in your email to Hickerson, etc.  I'd appreciate some information.

Jeff


Jess will stay til 5:30 p.m. for me.


My comments in red


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	Do Not Delete - Repeat parent for Stacey Vac

Date:		9/18/2000
Time:		9:00 AM - 10:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Meeting Dates:
	9/18/2000

Detailed Description:


Cheryl:

1. & 3.    You should verify wtih Cheryl Lewis whose information is in Lotus
Notes.  I do not have correct spelling of name or her fax number.

2.  Officers need to be confirmed through the Enron Corp. corporate
secretary's office.  See the separate email I just sent you.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	04/02/2001 04:45 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron Credit Inc.

Sara, I have stopped by your office but you are not around.  Please provide
the following information/clarification in light of your conversations with
other folks:

1. We do not have to send Bear the Officers/Traders list and other documents
with the agreements to get things moving?

2.  If we do, then who do I contact or ask Richard Sage to contact to get
this information re: the correct slate of officers updated?  No one has
advised me of these steps.  And actually, if we have to do this, I would like
Stephanie to take the lead on finishing her work on this part of the project.

3. Re: this attorney Cheryl at Bear  that you have talked to -- what is her
full name, phone, and fax?

Thanx.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


Tana:

With regard to FirstEnergy Corp., Enron can SELL only to this CP pursuant to
the on-line GTCs.  This CP cannot sell to us via EOL.

Leslie


-----Original Message-----
From: Fairchild, Tracy [mailto:tracy.fairchild@edelman.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:27 AM
To: 'arem@electric.com'; 'nplotkin@rcsis.com';
'douglass@energyattorney.com'
Cc: Allen, Stevan; Manuel, Erica
Subject: 10/20 SDUT: Small users might face $8 billion power bill

AReMers:

Here's the San Diego Union Story that ran on Saturday 10/20.  It includes
only part of my quote.  What I said in total, when asked to response from
AReM's perspective on Angelides' comments that DA would shift $8B over time
to other ratepayers was:

"Direct access is still a small part of California's energy market.
However, direct access is being held up as the scapegoat when one of the
biggest problems we have right now is $43 billion in contracts that
effectively hold California ratepayers hostage to the utilities for decades,
if not renegotiated."

Small users might face $8 billion power bill
Direct-access loophole used by big customers

By Craig D. Rose
STAFF WRITER

October 20, 2001

A legal loophole exploited by large electricity customers could leave mostly
smaller customers shouldering $8 billion more in electricity costs than they
should, the state treasurer disclosed yesterday.

The loophole opened over the summer when it became clear that large
customers could get lower electricity prices and might avoid the billions in
state costs from the electricity crisis by entering into so-called
direct-access relationships with alternative electricity suppliers.

Under direct-access deals, customers bypass their local utility as a source
of electricity and turn instead to an outside provider. The California
Public Utilities Commission barred direct access in late September. In a
letter yesterday, State Treasurer Philip Angelides chided the utilities
commission for failing to close the loophole sooner and urged commissioners
to retroactively cancel direct-access deals dating to July 1.

Angelides said the "direct-access stampede, which occurred as the PUC failed
to act," could cost utility customers $800 million through 2002, and more
than $8.2 billion while the state is financing power costs.

Commission President Loretta Lynch said the PUC delayed dealing with direct
access on the advice of the governor, Angelides and the Legislature. She
added that the commission is considering retroactive cancellation of
direct-access deals.

Other state officials, meanwhile, offered few clues yesterday as to how they
plan to seek changes to some of the long-term contracts that cover $43
billion in state power purchases. Gov. Gray Davis indicated Thursday that he
might seek to renegotiate some contract terms.

In a teleconference yesterday, advisers to the governor said discussing
their strategy might compromise their bargaining position. Barry Goode,
Davis' legal secretary, said the state is not pursuing changes for all the
long-term contracts -- there are more than 50 -- and he defended the
contracts as "very valuable and an asset to the state."

A growing number of critics says the contracts bind the state to expensive
and in some case unnecessary electricity purchases. Industrial and large
commercial customers, meanwhile, scrambled over the summer to avoid those
state costs by signing direct-access deals.

From July until Sept. 20, when the PUC barred the deals, large customers
boosted the amount of power they bought via direct access from 2 percent to
13 percent.

In San Diego Gas & Electric territory, the flight was heavier. About 18
percent of electricity now purchased by large power users is done via direct
access, bypassing the utility.

At the same time, direct access has been largely unavailable to smaller
customers. In fact, providers dumped residential direct-access customers as
uneconomical during the power crisis.

Smaller customers of SDG&E, Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas and
Electric Co., meanwhile, must now bear the costs of California's long-term
power contracts and of costs incurred earlier this year to deal with the
crisis.

The impact of direct access was underscored in an additional way by state
officials yesterday. Advisers to the governor explained that estimates of
state power purchase obligations for 2001 and 2002 have fallen by about 20
percent, from $21.4 billion down to $17.2 billion.

But the retail cost of state-purchased electricity will fall only 5.5
percent for the overwhelming majority of utility customers statewide. That's
because fewer customers remain to pay the costs, according to the state
Department of Water Resources, which is responsible for California's power
purchases.

The Alliance for Retail Energy Markets, an electricity supplier group,
reiterated yesterday that it will sue the utilities commission if it moves
to retroactively cancel direct access. Tracy Fairchild, a spokeswoman for
the group, said direct access was not the cause of high power prices for the
state.

"One of the biggest problems we have right now is $43 billion in contracts
that effectively hold California ratepayers hostage to the utilities for
decades, if not renegotiated," Fairchild said.

In a separate matter, the utilities commission said yesterday it will not
schedule additional hearings to deal with a second plan for resolving the
$747 million debt that SDG&E says it is owed by its customers.

Commission President Loretta Lynch indicated last week that hearings might
be held in San Diego. Lynch said yesterday she erred in suggesting the
hearings without first consulting with Commissioner Carl Wood, who is
assigned to oversee the SDG&E proceedings.

Consumer and environmental groups filed the second plan as an alternative to
a proposal presented by SDG&E and the governor for dealing with the debt.
Consumer groups say their plan would require at least $185 million more from
the utility to pay down the debt and would thereby save consumers at least
that much money.

State officials also said yesterday that the governor and state Legislature
remain at loggerheads over a bill by Senate President Pro Tempore John
Burton, D-San Francisco, that would separate a $12.5 billion bond offering
from the power contracts. The bill was approved by the Legislature in
special session.

Davis' press secretary, Steve Maviglio, said again yesterday that the
governor will veto the bill, which has not yet been sent to him. The Davis
administration says the bill would trigger lawsuits from electricity
suppliers who hold contracts with the state.

Staff writer Ed Mendel and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

Craig Rose's e-mail address is craig.rose@uniontrib.com. His phone number is
(619) 293-1814.


_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

In the response to question 2, it indicates that a document will be faxed
to me.  I have never received the fax.  This is what is outstanding on
Gleason.  Thanks.

Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com on 11/01/2000 10:35:27 AM
Extension:

To:   jkmurphy@JonesDay.com
cc:   Don.Miller@enron.com
Subject:  Re: Final response to Allegheny (Jones Day) 10/23 questions

Jane:
Refer to question #2 for the Gleason answer.  Please let me know if you
have any other questions.
Ben

(See attached file: Allegheny Question and Answers - Gleason version2.doc)
(See attached file: Allegheny Question and Answers - Gleason version2.doc)

 - Allegheny Question and Answers - Gleason version2.doc


I will be returning Monday, 10/08.  Cara will be doing COB and PGE system stuff in my absence.

Thank you for your support.

Donald.


Exhibit C and Exhibit D

	"Mike Cesario" <MCesario@ormet.com>
	12/04/2000 12:40 PM

		 To: <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Transaction Agreement

Dan,
I will make the change that you refer to on the transaction agreement.  Also,
which exhibits need to be signed in conjunction with the firm purchase/sale
agreement?  Let me know and I will begin getting them executed.
Thanks,
Mike

>>> <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com> 12/04/00 01:30PM >>>

Mike,
     I have reviewed the attached marked copy of the transaction agreement
and have gone over the changes with Craig.  Please change the term "best
efforts" which was added in the 14th line of Item 1 under Other to read
"commercially reasonable best efforts".  This will keep the concept the
same throughout the document where we use the term "commercially reasonable
best efforts".  With this change, please print out two copies of the
contract and two copies of the transaction agreement and proceed with
execution of each.  Please call if you have any questions.

                    "Mike
                    Cesario"             To:     <Craig.Breslau@enron.com>,
                    <MCesario@orm        <dan.j.hyvl@enron.com>
                    et.com>              cc:     "Mark Kleinginna"

<MKleinginna.WheelingPO.Wheeling_Domain@ormet.com
                    12/04/2000           >, "Tommy Temple"
                    10:49 AM
<TTemple.WheelingPO.Wheeling_Domain@ormet.com>
                                         Subject:     Transaction Agreement

Attached is the final, marked copy of the Ormet/Enron transaction
agreement.
Please let me know if you have any comments.  Otherwise, if you have none,
I will begin having final drafts executed by Ormet.
Thanks,
Mike

(See attached file: Enron_Doc.doc)


I'm flying to somewhere (probably DC) tonight, returning on Friday.  Ozzie is
making the travel arrangements, so you don't need to do anything.  I'll let
you know what else I find out.

Thanks,

Kay


Please find attached the Q1, Q2, Q3  and Q4 Nymex prices together with the PX
prices for Q1 and Q2.
Thanks
Alex


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
02:05 PM ---------------------------

"Dennis W. Loughridge" <loughrid@ruf.rice.edu> on 04/30/2001 10:49:10 AM
Please respond to <loughrid@rice.edu>
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: ALP presentation

Vince
I will be attending the ALP presentation on May 7 and would be pleased to
join the team for dinner if it is not too late.
Thank you
Dennis Loughridge

Dennis W. Loughridge
Director of Energy Consortium
Rice University
713-348-2812

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 8:16 AM
To: loughrid@rice.edu
Cc: luigical@rice.edu
Subject: ALP presentation

Sorry, trying again. I probably got a wrong E-mail address and the original
message
was returned.

Vince Kaminski
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001
08:15 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
04/10/2001 08:13 AM

To:   barrett@rice.edu, uecker@rice.edu, cmiller@rice.edu,
      lounghrid@rice.edu, luigical@rice.edu
cc:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
      Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject:  ALP presentation

On behalf of  Enron Corp. I would like to invite you to an ALP Project
presentation by a group of students
of Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management, Rice University.

The students will present the results of a research project regarding
electronic trading
platforms in the energy industry.

The presentation will be held on May 7, at 4:00 p.m. at Enron, 1400 Smith.

We would also like to invite you to dinner, following the presentation.

Vince Kaminski

Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director - Research
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Room EB1962
Houston, TX 77002-7361

Phone:    (713) 853 3848
     (713) 410 5396 (cell)
Fax  :      (713) 646 2503
E-mail: vkamins@enron.com


how did it reduce var if we added to the underlying positions?

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6

JBlock does take up some of the VaR for Agg-Liquids; however, it is not a
contributor of VaR violation for effective date Nov. 6.  As matter of fact,
the VaR for JBlock went down.  The component VaR graph below shows that
heating oil was a hedge but no longer as of yesterday.  Gasoil is still a
hedge for Agg-Liquids but the hedge is reduced.

Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
11/07/2000 12:07 PM
To: Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6

Where is the mention of J Block hedges.

	From:  Christian LeBroc @ ENRON                           11/07/2000 12:04 PM

To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Liquids Violation Memo: Nov. 6

Liquids desk has a VaR violation for effective date Nov. 6 of  $8.2MM, over
its limit by 3 percent.

The violation was due to heating and gasoil going shorter by 939K barrels.
Essential, shorten the heat/gasoil position reduced the overall net long
products, portfolio causing the crack spreads to widen when crude oil is net
short 5MM barrels.

Furthermore, volatility on crude was up 3 percent with 15 cents upward move
in price.

Christian


Thanks for keeping me up to date. Out of curiosity, do you know why El Paso
changed the trade date in the first place?

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   12/20/2000 01:45 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Trade date for deal 475585.01

Kate,
just fyi, El Paso struck thru our 12/6/00 trade date and placed 12/5/00.  I
spoke to Chi, of El Paso and he said the 12/6/00 was okay.  I just made a
note on the confirm and sending it to the fileroom to be executed.
Thanks
Stephanie


Lynn,

Do you know anything about the Congress Plaza Hotel?  I was searching for
somewhere to stay and it looks pretty convenient to the office.

Thanks,
Robin


As you know, we have been experiencing very long processing times for Monthly
Accounting Closing each month.  This problem is becoming increasingly worse
each month because most of the prior months have un-finalized
invoices/payments which require reprocessing this data each month (draft,
reversal of last accrual and creating new accrual).   This condition goes
back to Jan. 99 for Unify, Jan. 95 for pre-Unify PMAs, and becomes worse each
month as more such items are accumulated.

A few month ago, we discussed this situation and as shown below, not much
progress has been made in finalizing prior month data in Gas business while
better  progress has been achieved in Power settlement.  It is essential this
be strongly addressed.  Otherwise, the system will soon be unable to process
the Monthly Closing (mass draft & Closing) within a day.  It will be very
helpful if you would prepare a plan to address this issue and attend a
meeting on  Thursday (3/9) at 10:00 in EB2601 to discuss future actions.
Thank you.

---------------------- Forwarded by Inja Chun/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000 01:20 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Technology

	From:  Regan M Smith                           03/02/2000 11:06 AM

To: Inja Chun/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: As discussed, below is the Mar-00 Accrual metrics, by delivery
period.

Inja,

Below is the revised detail items which reflect the open items from less than
July 99.  It compares from Jan1st metrics to March 1st metrics.
The load to Unify comes from the 2 angels below.  The Mass Draft has the
concern of statements not finalized for those periods, which the back end
accrual & reporting has
the increased load of line items.

Front End process
Mass Draft Process (load) - whenever any statement has not been finalized for
a prior delivery period, it has to redraft for those deals.  Hence, redraft
for every deal for that counterparty.

Back End processes
Accrual Process - The accrual extracts on a line item detail, which is
stored, and reported on various reports.
GL Month Process - The GL Month Report extracts on a line item detail, which
is reported from the ACRL and PDCLS perspective.

GAS Summary:
    No of Line Items    No. of Line Items
    July 99 & Prior Month    since July 99
 As of Dec-99   12,848    87,574
 As of Mar-00   10,802    123,694

 Growth/Reduction  <2046>    36,120

---------------------- Forwarded by Regan M Smith/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000 08:30
AM ---------------------------

	Regan M Smith
	01/01/2000 02:08 PM

To: Inja Chun/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: As discussed, below is the Dec99 Accrual metrics, by delivery period.

Inja,
As discussed, below is the Dec99 Accrual metrics, by delivery period.

Again, this increased history creates additional loads on:
mass draft process - having to redraft prior delivery periods
accrual process - increases the accrual time, reporting
retrieval, reporting, sending to MSA J/P.  Example, we are nearing 10,000
line items alone of ACRL data for 016.
period close reversal - each month we send a offset reversal for every prior
month accrual
overall data growth in detail tables to support prior months

This can be also seen by running the accrual reprint retrieve report, or the
finalized transaction by gl month report (ACRL).

Regan


The time is right in the middle of trading on an AGA day.   Therefore, it is unlikely that anyone managing a stack will be able to attend.   I would suggest having Tom May and/or Lloyd attend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forster, David
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:59 AM
To:	Kroll, Heather; Tricoli, Carl; Davis, Dana; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	PowerEx

PowerEx will be coming to Houston and would like to meet us on Nov. 7 9:00-11:00.

They are the marketing and trading sub of BC Hydro and have dealt before with our Calgary and Portland offices. They are now opening an office in Toronto and wish to transact more in MAPP, NEPOOL, PJM and SPP. The purpose of their visit is an informal meet n' greet to establish contact with people at Enron.

They will be coming with their Head of Origination and Head of Trading.

Please let me know if you or someone from your group would like to attend.

Thanks,

Dave


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001
04:00 PM ---------------------------

"Pamela Anderson" <pama9@flash.net> on 03/28/2001 02:41:53 PM
To: "Sandra Brawner" <Sandra.F.Brawner@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Don't laugh

----- Original Message -----
From: Sue Caldwell <sue@mbainsurance.net>
To: Pam Anderson <Pama9@flash.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 2:28 PM
Subject: Fw: Don't laugh

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bert@MBA insurance" <Bert@MBAinsurance.net>
> To: "aSue" <Sue@mbainsurance.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 1:34 PM
> Subject: Fw: Don't laugh
>
>
> > : Don't laugh
> >
> >
> >
>

 - laugh.jpg


In a recent CommodityLogic staff meeting, I took stock of the number of
people and projects that I have provided from Energy Operations to that
team.  From conversations that you and I have had, I get the impression that
perhaps others have led you to believe that my commitment to CommodityLogic
has been limited.  The truth is that I hand picked key members of the team
and transferred projects that we were already undertaking in Energy
Operations to round out the suite of products to be offered through
CommodityLogic.  I just thought that it might be helpful for you to have the
facts so that you are fully informed whenever you are involved in
conversations around CommodityLogic.

Staffing Contributions
 CommodityLogic Project Manager (NomLogic):  Carrie Slagle, Manager
 CommodityLogic Project Maanger (Integration):  Susan Harrison, Manager
 CommodityLogic Project Manager (ContactLogic)  Mary Solmonson, Senior
Director
 CommodityLogic Team Member (NomLogic):  Molly Sumrow, Specialist

 User Requirement and Testing Staff:  Energy Operations Gas Schedulers, Power
Confirmation Team and   Financial Settlements

Projects Transferred to CommodityLogic

 NomLogic (previously known as Contract Exchange in Energy Operations)
 ContactLogic (global databases in Energy Operations)

Two of the Project Managers on the team, Carrie Slagle and Susan Harrison,
were transferred from Energy Operations to CommodityLogic.  Both had worked
in managerial roles in our natural gas business, reporting to Brent Price.
Both had been significantly challenged in the first half of 2000 by roles
where they were charged with managing large teams of people.  But knowing
both Carrie and Susan well, I viewed them as valuable members of the
operations team who know a lot about the business.  Both have proven in the
past to be good project leaders. Therefore, identifying them as project
managers for CommodityLogic made a lot of sense -- providing gas operations
experience to the CommodityLogic effort and utilizing their skills most
appropriately .  Brent Price and I worked together to sell Susan and Carrie
on the assignment and to transition them to their CommodityLogic roles very
quickly.

One of the key team members working under Carrie Slagle on NomLogic was a
scheduler on our gas team (Molly).  Bob Hall, our opeartions controller over
natural gas, suggested that a scheduler on the team would be valuable, since
Carrie and Susan have actually never scheduled gas themselves.  NomLogic was
already a project that was underway in Energy Operations.  We started the
project shortly after the tremendous ramp up in natural gas volumes due to
EOL transactions.  We called the project Contract Exchange, and Bob Superty,
who is the daily manager over gas logistics, was the project sponsor.  Tom
looped in our Contract Exchange project into CommodityLogic and subsequently
renamed it NomLogic.  Molly had been a member of the Contract Exchange
project team, and we transfered her along with the project to
CommodityLogic.

Many of my key employees in gas scheduling, confirmations and settlements
work very closely with the various CommodityLogic project managers.  It is
input from my group that has created the modules by defining user
requirements and they have served as the testing teams as well.

In the fall, I assigned Mary Solmonson to focus full time on CommodityLogic.
I recognized that we needed more senior level involvement and I viewed Mary's
participation as a good way to leverage my time.  Previously, she was a
senior director managing our Global Databases group.  With an IT development
background and a very thorough knowledge of our operations business, Mary was
the perfect candidate out of my direct report team to focus on
CommodityLogic.  Unfortunately, her recent health problems will curtail her
involvement going forward.  During the five months that she was assigned to
CommodityLogic, Mary developed a plan for ContactLogic that Tom feels is
excellent and notes that it is an important complement to the other modules.

Early in the project, I had also selected two very key and knowledgeable
operations professionals to be part of the  CommodityLogic team - Leslie
Reeves, who played a significant role in building Enron's power business from
day one, and Todd Hall, with experience in natural gas and emerging
products.  They were part of the  CommodityLogic team in the early days, and
both made personal decisions to exit the team and return to managing mid and
back office operations.   Susan Harrison and Carrie Slagle were their
replacements on CommodityLogic.


Attached is the referenced list.  Again, my note about credit derivatives not
being marked, and also, I am still not responding for Australia yet on a
going forward basis.


Enron notes to discuss tomorrow...

Background:
1.  Late March - we met with members of GSS (Global Strategic Sourcing
group) and the CIO from ETS (Enron Transportation Services)
2.  Mid May -  we showed a demo to a mix of EES (Enron Energy Services), GSS
(John Gillespie, John Will, Craig Brown), and ETS contacts
3.  EES and ETS were interested, mentioned DealBench as too costly for their
needs, we followed with a proposal to GSS for a Pilot, response was that we
need to get a divisions on board
4.  Late June (6/28) - met with 2 contacts from EES (Procurement Mgrs who
were in the May mtg, they suggested we show how our system can help their
upstream counterparts who structure the "deals" (since the Proc. Mgrs are
simply the downstream execution piece), they also mentioned that GSS is busy
with SAP/C1 ibuyit rollout right now

Questions:
1.  Who are the "deal makers", what is their function, what tools do they
use, how do we best position our solution with them?
2.  How are decisions made?  Should we target a solution to a particular
division e.g. EES?  Our contacts have said solutions are purchased both
through GSS as a "gatekeeper" and by a single divison on its own (as there
seems to be a number of maverick projects going on at the moment)

-----Original Message-----
From:  Robin Deguara
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:34 AM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: FW: Conf call with Cameron and Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:12 AM
To: Robin Deguara
Subject: Re: Conf call with Cameron and Ian

8 AM. 10 AM. 3 PM.
Best,
Jeff

Robin Deguara
<robin@perfec        To:     "'jeff_dasovich@enron.com'"

t.com>               <jeff_dasovich@enron.com>

cc:

06/29/2001           Subject:     Conf call with Cameron and Ian
06:51 PM

Jeff,

Please provide me with three time slots you would be available to have a
conf call on Friday the 6th between Cameron and Ian.
Thank you,

Robin Deguara
Executive Assistant
<<...OLE_Obj...>>
Perfect Commerce, Inc. tel: 650-798-3367
fax: 650-858-1095 email: robin@perfect.com


[IMAGE]
 NEW AD-FREE WEATHERBUG PRO NOW AVAILABLE!    Due to popular demand, WeatherBug proudly announces  WeatherBug Pro,  a fully customizable version of your WeatherBug that lets you:   Click here to order WeatherBug Pro    [IMAGE] Eliminate all advertising on your WeatherBug [IMAGE] Personalize your own "My Favorites" section to give you one-click access to your favorite internet sites [IMAGE] Pick your own WeatherBug background (or "skin") from an ever-expanding selection. Check out these samples:   [IMAGE]  Alpine Lake  [IMAGE]  Techno  [IMAGE]  Patriotic   [IMAGE] New! Exclusive content package for subscribers, including Airport Delays, International Weather Conditions & Forecasts, Pro Sports Weather Outlook, Historical Data and more!  [IMAGE] Plus, all the newest features of the latest version of AWS WeatherBug: Incredible Time Lapse Camera Images, Improved Travel Forecasts, New Mapping Technology, Snow Cover Maps, Image of the Day Archives, and Beach and Boating Conditions.  [IMAGE] Free Unlimited Personal Technical Support via email. [IMAGE] 50% Faster than previous versions of AWS WeatherBug  How to order: Ordering is easy, and comes with a No-Risk 30 Day Money Back Guarantee if you aren't completely satisfied. To order, click below.  [IMAGE]Click to Order    Thanks for being a loyal WeatherBug user. We're proud to have you  as a part of the fastest growing community on the web, and hope  that you will consider expanding your 'Bug's features by subscribing  to WeatherBug Pro. Regardless of your decision, we hope that you  will continue to rely on WeatherBug for all of your weather information.  Thanks again,  Stephanie, Product Manager and the entire WeatherBug Team http://www.weatherbug.com

[IMAGE]


New (**) and Updated (*) items on this report are as follows:

ALL STATES
** 2001 Legislature - Political control resulting from November elections

WISCONSIN
*   5820-CG-104  Superior Water Light & Power - Interconnecting line to Great
Lakes - Approved


Here is a spreadsheet of the counterparties who own generation in NY.  You can sort by counterparty or zone.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Irani, Eric
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:03 AM
To:	Politis, Nick; Wheeler, Rob
Subject:	NY generation

Here is a chart of existing generation in NY as of Jan. 1, 2001.  The chart to the right can be used to sort and filter.


This is the draft copy of the Global Standards Report, primarily for ENA, for
September 2000.

Please review and provide comments.

Thanks,
Mike


I have spoken with Wayne Stoltenberg at Bear Stearns (on the Investment
Banking side) about the need to set up an account at Bear Stearns for JEDI I
to execute the sale of the Quicksilver Shares.  I explained that the
operations people are reluctant to establish an account if there is little
activity anticipated.  In the case of this JEDI I account, the only
transaction this will take place is the SALE of the Quicksilver shares, there
will be no further activity.  In fact, we will probably be closing the
account soon after the trade is settled.  He is very much aware of the
situation and is going to contact the appropriate people in Chicago to
instruct them to be fully cooperative with Enron in establishing this
account.

I realize this is a huge inconvenience to have to set up an account for this
one trade, but given the negotiations with the company and Bear Stearns, it
is the best thing to do.  If anybody has any questions, please let me know.
As I understand the events, the following items are being prepared by us
(Enron):

Sara/Stephanie - preparing documents to open the account
Mary - preparing stock power/resolutions to sell the stock and retrieving the
shares from the vault
Jim - obtaining any legal opinions if necessary (I just don't remember)
Aneela/Theresa - working with the BS contact to send documents to
Mark/Jempy - working with Wayne(BS) to get the sale done

If this is consistent with what you all think, great.  If not, please respond
to the group list with whatever I have wrong.  I hope everything goes well, I
know things are in good hands with legal and operations, so let me know.
Thanks so much for all your help.  Donna


brent puked it out pretty hard on friday...probably as good as it gets to sell this puppy

for your benefit make sure you get someone to go back and look closely at relative storage levels and prices levels for all btus in 1998
relationahips as you recall get bizarre on the lower end of the spectrum...it's a good couple of graphs to keep around

1- all stocks as a% full chart
2-btus equi chart
1vs2
1vs diffs in #2

If i could access this info i'd send it...but enron systems being what they are it takes hours to connnect to houston drive


Hello,

The first edition of the weekly new generation report is available at:

O:_Dropbox/West New Gen/Weekly/1_10_19_01.

This is the first edition of a new report that is designed to provide Enron employees with the latest media reports and market analysis on issues affecting new power plant construction in the WSCC.  If you have any questions or comments about this new report, don't hesitate to bring them to my attention.  Thanks and enjoy,

James Bruce
Enron North America		(503) 464-8122
West Power Desk		(503) 860-8612 (c)
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC0306	(503) 464-3740 (fax)
Portland, OR 97204		James.Bruce@Enron.com


FYI :  Enron's retail coalition released this today and it has already generated some stories in the press


Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478


Sorry, not yet.  Thanks for checking on me.  Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wojcik Jr., Ed
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 5:10 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: Marketing Business Objects

Hi Kim,

	Did that procedure work for you?

-Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Watson, Kimberly
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Wojcik Jr., Ed
Subject: RE: Marketing Business Objects

I'm sorry, I havn't loaded this yet.  Have no fear, I will call you.  Many thanks for your persistance!  Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wojcik Jr., Ed
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:41 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: RE: Marketing Business Objects

Hi Kim,

	Did those instructions help you get your Business Objects file locations configured Ok?

Thanks,
-Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Watson, Kimberly
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:24 AM
To: Wojcik Jr., Ed
Subject: RE: Marketing Business Objects

Hi Ed,

Gosh, I am so sorry we have not connected yet.  I have been on a fast run.  How early in the morning do you come in?  Do I need to be at my desk?  How late in the evening are you in?

I will make time for you.  Thanks for your persistence.

Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wojcik Jr., Ed
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Cc: Powers, Ken
Subject: Marketing Business Objects

Hi Kim,

	I'd like to schedule 10 mintues of your time so we can adjust your Business Objects file locations to the new ETS Marketing standard configuration.  When's a good time for you?  I'm available except between 14:00 and 16:00 on Tuesday.  I'd like to help you complete this configuration as soon as possible.

Thanks,
-Ed


Rick --

I see that Amr has taken over the Fundamentals Group.  The fiefdom grows!!!!

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ibrahim, Amr
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:29 AM
To:	Walton, Steve; Levy, Alberto; Maurer, Luiz; Canovas, Guillermo; Nicolay, Christi L.; Twiggs, Thane; Linnell, Elizabeth; Guerrero, Janel; Yeung, Charles; Lawrence, Linda L.; Gottfredson, Bryan; Rishe, Frank; Allegretti, Daniel; Stroup, Kerry; Fromer, Howard; Boston, Roy; Kingerski, Harry; Keene, Patrick; Neustaedter, Robert; Comnes, Alan
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Williams, Ryan; Misra, Narsimha; Wagner, Joseph
Subject:	Functioning ISO Regualtory Database

Colleagues:

This is a quick note to let you know that with the help of GA Information (Elizabeth Linnell), the Fundamentals Group is starting to populate the functioning ISO Regulatory database.  The structure of the database (which will remain open to incorporate any of your suggestions)  is outlined below (it includes the latest comments from Christi and Thane).

The target customer group of this product is the traders either directly (by having access to the database) or,  and preferably,  via you in the field.

The final product will be in Excel format, that through MS Access it should enable you to create a very flexible comparative reporting mechanism. An example would be a report on the rules of conflict resolution process across all the functioning ISO's in the country, and so on.

The time table of this project in two phases is as follows:

Phase One:  It shall end by October 12th and shall include the following ISO's.
		ISO				Contact
1.	PJM				Guillermo Canovas	(713) -345-8946
2.	California			Alberto Levy		Caracas: (58-212)-902-7811
3.	New England			Amr Ibrahim		(713)-853-3037)

Phase Two: It shall end by November 12th, and shall include the following:
4.	ERCOT				Amr Ibrahim.
5.	New York ISO			Amr Ibrahim  (tentative).

Linda Lawrence is kind to help us with a support database in which all the seminal documents for each ISO are kept so that to allow you to check the original document if you would like to substantiate, or challenge,  the findings of the database.

The second stage of the project is to link it to the current RTO process.  However, this is a slightly different issue, and shall be communicated to you as it becomes more stable.

I shall keep you posted with progress, meanwhile, please let me know if you have any question.

Best regards

AI


Brant,  The following are my responses;

1.  We don't have a problem removing fax notice as long as they are willing
to leave the required termination notice at 5 days.  Since we can't fax
notice, we will have to mail such notice which will take several days.

2.  We can remove affiliate assignment.

Sorry about the delay.

	Brant Reves
	12/15/2000 10:22 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Bridgeline Guaranty

Gerald,

Here is their response to our comments.  Not much but take a look:

Under term7:  Notices - unless we include language similiar to...'Fax is
acceptable as long as the fax is followed by hardcopy documentation and
effective upon such hardcopy reciept.'  Back to square one.  They don't like
fax.
Under term 8:  they are objecting to affiliate assignment.  Successor is ok.
Affiliate assignment is no good.  They would like to take out the term
assigns.

that is it.

brant

To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Bridgeline Guaranty

Brant,  The attached doc. contains Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC's
comments to our guaranty form with our responses.  Please forward as
appropriate.  I would be happy to discuss our comments with Hess if they so
desire.


Tana:

Under the entry for  Broadwing Telecommunications, the notation is that it
should roll up under the parent "Broadwind" Communications Services.  It
should be "Broadwing" Communications Services, Inc.

Marie

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tana Jones@ECT
	03/29/01 09:06 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-28-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 09:06 AM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/28/2001 04:42 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-28-01

Please see attached.


Please send it to me.
john

From: Julie Pechersky/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/17/2001 09:33 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: bloomberg

John,
We are trying to transfer your bloomberg account and need to know who within
Enron North America can sign-off on this
contract.  Would that be you?  Or do you have a legal department that we
should forward it to?  We initially changed the
name on it and had it signed under Enron Corp which is where the majority of
our Bloomberg contracts lie, but because
you can actually execute trades from the system that you are now using, it
has to be under your departments name
and we need someone to sign the contract.

Let me know.

Thanks,
Julie

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "ALLYSON FELLER, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <AFELLER@bloomberg.net>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22ALLYSON+20FELLER+2C+20BLOOMBERG_+20NEW+20YORK+22+20+3CAF
ELLER+40bloomberg+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 12:03 PM
To: JPECHER@ENRON.COM
Subject: bloomberg

Hi Julie. I noticed the contracts have been received.  However, "North
America"
has been crossed off the contract. That is the name it was signed under and
still the current trading name for Emissions and Natural gas. Not sure if it
was a mistake or not. Anyway - please get back to me when you can. I am going
to try to set up a meeting with the gas guys for tomorrow 4/17. Thanks


Just a few notes on scheduling:

The new VESTAL_6_WDFIRE unit's counterparty name is SierraPower.  This was
being scheduled as Vestal but the counterparty name has been changed.

Also, there have been a few errors in scheduling the Wheelabrator units.
They should be scheduled as follows:

Wheelabrat:  MARTEL_2_AMFOR
WheelSHAST:  WSENGY_1_UNIT 4

Thanks and let me know if you have any questions,

Kourtney


Stephanie,  Attached are the revised PA and TSA per our discussions today.


Dear Advisory Board Member,

Thank you for your continued support of NACECs Initiative "Environmental
Challenges and Opportunities of the Evolving Continental Electricity Market".

Please find attached the following documents for your review and to be
further discussed during the conference call Thursday May 24 at 3:00 EST.

1) an Interim Note for the Secretariat report
2) a draft recommendations checklist (for initial discussion)
3)  a list of the advisory board members and bios (please note that we have
shortened some of the bios, if you have yet to submit a bio please send a
copy to yolanda@ccemtl.org )

Items to be discussed during conference call:
I) Secretariat update - progress, expert report, symposium
II) Process and approach for developing guidelines/recommendations
III) Initial discussion of guidelines/recommendations
IV) 2nd Advisory Board meeting date and venue

Details of the conference call:

Participants from Canada and the United States should dial:
1-877-633-5353 (toll free)

Participants from Mexico should dial:
0-1-800-123-0200 and ask the operator to charge this telephone call to the
telephone number: (1-514) 868-2558

then enter the following Code: 023405#

If there is any problem with the communication during the call  please dial *0
(Conference call reference: C799250)

On behalf of my colleagues at NACEC,
Sincerely,

Yolanda Clegg

Yolanda Clegg, M.Sc.
Environment, Economy and Trade Program
North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation
393 rue St-Jacques Ouest, bureau 200
Montreal
Quebec
CANADA         H2Y 1N9

tel: 514-350-4368
fax: 514-350-4314
yolanda@ccemtl.org

http://www.cec.org

 - Interim Note.doc
 - Recommendations checklist.doc
 - Members and Bios.doc


A procedural order issued late last night on the Staff Investigation in the
California market.  A special FERC Commission meeting will be held November 1
to consider a draft order on remedies.  The Commission will also issue the
staff investigation report.  Thereafter, comments are due within three weeks
to supplement the record or comment on the Commission's proposed remedies.
On November 9, the Commission will hold a public conference to discuss
proposed remedies.  Based on the full record then, the FERC expects to issue
an order directing remedies by the end of the year.


Please see the attached file that reflects the multiple for each asset sale.  As you can see for assets that had losses, we show no multiple.  Additionally, there are some assets that have no EBITDA at all (that we are aware of), thus we show no multiple.  Please let me know if this is what you expected.  Thanks!


===================== FOOLWATCH - THE MOTLEY FOOL ===============
                       Friday, September 28, 2001
benjamin.rogers@enron.com
=================================================================
Editor's Picks:
---------------------
- Amazon Under Pressure
- The Price of Staying Put
- Product: Uncover Hidden Telecom Values
- Fool Reduces Staff
-----------------------------------------------------------------

                    Close    Change  %Change

        FOOL 50   1,228.67   +23.76   +1.97%
        DJIA      8,829.15  +147.73   +1.70%
        S&P 500   1,040.14   +21.53   +2.11%
        NASDAQ    1,498.56   +37.85   +2.59%

              (Numbers as of 4:00 p.m. ET)
               THE LATEST MARKET NUMBERS
           http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507052

-----------------------------------------------------------------

SPONSORED BY: AMEX
Hey Fools! Trade online with a company you know and
trust-American Express! Experience personalized planning
tools, exceptional customer service and low commissions.
Apply online!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=507053

-----------------------------------------------------------------

RULE BREAKER: AMAZON UNDER PRESSURE
  What's with those Taco Bell commercials? Brian Lund asks if
  Amazon has jumped its final shark.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507054

FOOL ON THE HILL: THE PRICE OF STAYING PUT
  If there's a Nasdaq company in your portfolio that's lost more
  than 90% of its value and is not making a profit, Bill Mann
  says, "Sell."
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507055

PRODUCT: UNCOVER HIDDEN TELECOM VALUES
  Check out the latest issue of The Motley Fool Select. This
  month, our writers uncover some potential telecom winners.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=507056

NEWS: FOOL REDUCES STAFF
  A letter from Tom and David Gardner to our community.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507057

NEWS: PAIN ACROSS THE PACIFIC
  Japanese companies Sony and NEC both warned of disappearing
  profits caused by the economic storm.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507058

TAXES: WHAT'S MY TAX BRACKET?
  Who cares, right? Wrong. Find out why you need to know and how
  to calculate it.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507059

NEWS: PENNY STOCK REPRIEVE NO "GREEN LIGHT"
  A temporary reprieve may allow some troubled companies to avoid
  delisting, but they're still best avoided.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507060

FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF TODAY'S STORIES, CLICK THE LINK BELOW.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507061

-----------------------------------------------------------------

SPONSORED BY: AMEX
Hey Fools! Trade online with a company you know and
trust-American Express! Experience personalized planning
tools, exceptional customer service and low commissions.
Apply online!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=507062

-----------------------------------------------------------------

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507063
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507064

WANNA TAKE THE SHORTCUT?
Check out our new Crash Courses, the fastest way to get
your finances in order. Get results in less than an hour, for
just $10. Try one today!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507065

PERKS FOR FOOLS ONLY
Get free stuff and special offers, just for you!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507066

CUSTOMER SERVICE
Ask our staff for help with email delivery problems.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507067

UNSUBSCRIBE
Here's how to unsubscribe or change your settings.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers@enron.com

_________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 1995-2001 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved.
Legal Information: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=507068

MsgId: msg-6111-2001-09-28_17-21-15-6247576_1_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-17:46:13(9-28-2001)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

 - goggles1.exe


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
02:25 PM ---------------------------

Peter F Keavey
04/12/2001 02:24 PM
To: Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Top Forty things You will NEVER hear a Southern Man say:

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
02:23 PM ---------------------------

"Peter Keavey" <pkeavey@hotmail.com> on 04/12/2001 02:23:25 PM
To: peter.f.keavey@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Top Forty things You will NEVER hear a Southern Man say:

>From: Anne Moisan <amoisan@internationalsos.com>
>To: "'pkeavey@hotmail.com'" <pkeavey@hotmail.com>
>Subject: FW: Top Forty things You will NEVER hear a Southern Man say:
>Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:09:59 -0400
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: John Hankamer
>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:35 PM
>To: Anne Moisan
>Subject: FW: Top Forty things You will NEVER hear a Southern Man say:
>
>
>compliments of Mr. Roark...
>
>
>The Top FORTY Things You Will NEVER Hear A Southern Man Say:
>
>
>Oh I just couldn't, she's only sixteen.
>
>I'll take Shakespeare for 1000, Alex.
>
>Duct tape won't fix that.
>
>Honey, I think we should sell the pickup and buy a family sedan.
>
>Come to think of it, I'll have a Heineken.
>
>We don't keep firearms in this house.
>
>Has anybody seen the sideburns trimmer?
>
>You can't feed that to the dog.
>
>I thought Graceland was tacky.
>
>No kids in the back of the pickup, it's just not safe.
>
>Wrestling's fake.
>
>Honey, did you mail that donation to Greenpeace?
>
>We're vegetarians.
>
>Do you think my gut is too big?
>
>I'll have grapefruit and grapes instead of biscuits and gravy.
>
>Honey, we don't need another dog.
>
>Who gives a damn who won the Civil War?
>
>Give me the small bag of pork rinds.
>
>Too many deer heads detract from the decor.
>
>Spittin is such a nasty habit.
>
>I just couldn't find a thing at Walmart today.
>
>Trim the fat off that steak.
>
>Cappuccino tastes better than espresso.
>
>The tires on that truck are too big.
>
>I'll have the arugula and radicchio salad.
>
>I've got it all on the C: drive.
>
>Unsweetened tea tastes better.
>
>Would you like your fish poached or broiled?
>
>My fiancee, Bobbie Jo, is registered at Tiffany's.
>
>I've got two cases of Zima for the Super Bowl.
>
>Little Debbie snack cakes have too many fat grams.
>
>Checkmate.
>
>She's too young to be wearing a bikini.
>
>Does the salad bar have bean sprouts?
>
>Hey, here's an episode of "Hee Haw" that we haven't seen.
>
>I don't have a favorite college team.
>
>Be sure to bring my salad dressing on the side. You All.
>
>Those shorts ought to be a little longer, Darla.
>
>And, the Number One thing you'll NEVER hear a Southern Man say:
>
>Nope, no more for me. I'm drivin' tonight
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Howdy Miss Kim,

Bet you can wait to say Ariva Derchi and see Italy?  Where abouts are you
going?  Two of my sisters went to Northern Italy a year ago and had a great
time.

We had rain everyday in Scotland, but it was still so beautiful.  One night
we stayed on the coast of the Irish Sea and saw there was a ferry about a
half-a-block down the street so checked out where we could go.  Ended up
taking a high speed ferry across the Irish Sea to Larne and did a day trip
of the Irish Coast.  Fantastic.

We did a small cruise boat on Loch Ness, a tour bus, a double decker bus,
the train, the ferry and the tube!  The second to the last day we drove to
Gatwick, drop the car in short term parking and got a student pass  (must
look younger than we thought) and took the train to Victoria Station.
Walked over to Buckingham Palace, Hyde Park and Piccadilly Circus.  Took the
underground to the Tower.  Hadn't been there since 1972 (probably the year
you were born).  They have cleaned the entire outside of the tower and it
looks fabulous.  All the displays have been reworked and everything was so
interesting.  Could easily have spent an entire day there.

We're coming down the end of November for Mr. Matt's 1st birthday.  Mark,
Michelle and Matt are arriving Aug 29 and leaving Sept 2.  We did get to see
them on our layover on the way back from England.  They met us at the
airport and we went to Pappasitos.  Nothing like being up 20 hours and
eating chips and salsa.

Have a wonderful time.

Take care - hugs,

M

-


The attachment on Ted's memo contains the list of students who will attend
the luncheon tomorrow.  Thanks again for doing this! --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2000 06:34 PM
---------------------------

"Jacobs, Ted K" <tjacobs@ou.edu> on 01/31/2000 03:21:31 PM
To: Shelly Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hope/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: OU Energy Management Students

George, Sally and Shelly,

The attachment is a list of the students who will be coming to Houston and
be going to both dinner and lunch.

We are looking forward to both dinner and our lunch/office tour of Enron.
Again, thank you for the effort and support Enron puts forth for our
program.

George, unless I hear otherwise, we will plan on meeting you and Shelly
tomorrow night at 8:00 at The Sierra Grill on Montrose. If we are running a
little late, we will be there shortly.

 <<OU Energy Management students who will be attending the North American
Prospect Expo.doc>>

Ted K. Jacobs
Director Energy Management
The University of Oklahoma
307 West Brooks, Room 218
Norman, OK  73019-4007
405-325-0758
405-325-2096 fax
E-mail: tjacobs@ou.edu
Website: www.ou.edu/business/em

 - OU Energy Management students who will be attending the North American
Prospect Expo.doc


We have received Articles of Merger from the referenced counterparty evidencing the merger of BP Exploration & Oil Inc. with and into Amoco Oil Company, with the surviving entity being Amoco Oil Company, which shall continue under the name of BP Products North America Inc., such merger being effective 10/11/01.

Copies are being sent to the usual Houston distribution.  I am sending a copy of this email to London Credit and Legal because I understand ECTRIC has done some financial trades with BP Exploration & Oil Inc.

Houston Legal is awaiting Houston Credit's approval of the merger and its impact on our ISDA Master and underlying credit.


Please review and call me.


In the event that any of your direct reports in Buenos Aires are receiving a
1999 bonus I wanted to co-ordinate the administration of such bonus to ensure
we follow your instructions and avoid communicating twice.

We are available to assist in the administration to the extent requested by
each of you. The standard administration is in the format of a letter of
appreciation and recognition dispersed directly by myself.

If you wish to administer this directly or together please let me know. If
there is an alternative format you wish to use we are also happy to
accommodate and assist if needed.

MFG


Below is the revised Transaction Agreement.  Jason, you may send this version
to GRE

chris
x31666


Rod:
I found my file and here is where things stand:

1. On cross default threshold, they wanted it to be the same as the
collateral threshold but my notes indicate that they were okay leaving it at
$100,000.

2. In lieu of receiving financials from them, we had agreed to accept
quarterly and annual Lease Operating Statements.  Did I use the correct
term?  Do we need a definition for this or is it understood what these
statements are?  I am also assuming that they are internally prepared.  Is
that correct?  My notes indicate that these would be provided within 90 days
after quarter end.

3. We agreed to a collateral threshold for them of $500,000.

4.  For the MAC trigger, is the only test the Net Cash Flow/Revenue test and
if so, what would trigger the MAC?  Are there other triggers?  We used to
have Funded Debt/Partners Capital, EBITDA Coverage Ratio and Minimum Partners
Capital tests.  Alos, here are my proposed definitions:

Cash Flow means Net Income plus depreciation and non-cash charges minus
capital expenditures as shown on the income statement.

Net Income means gross revenues and other proper income credits, less all
proper income charges, including taxes on income.

Revenue is cash received from the sale of oil, gas and plant products.

Should there be references to the Lease Operating Statements in these
definitions?

5. All Performance Assurance would be rounded up to multiples of $10,000.

This is all that I have.  Let me know what you think.

Carol