This legislator is very bright and articulate -- he obviously "gets it"

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/13/2001 03:54 PM -----

	Peter Bray@NEWPOWER
	07/13/2001 09:40 AM

		 To: susan.j.mara@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: From Assemblyman John Campbell's Laptop To Yours, 7/13/01

Y'all could have an ally in John Campbell, to the extent you want to work the
Sacramento leagues...   Peter

----- Forwarded by Peter Bray/HOU/NewPower on 07/13/01 09:38 AM -----

	"Cowen, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Cowen@asm.ca.gov>
	07/13/01     09:19 AM

		  To:
		  cc:
		  Subject: From Assemblyman John Campbell's Laptop To Yours, 7/13/01

Campbell's Capitol Communications

Weekly Report
July 13, 2001

Governor's myths

We have known for some time that Gray Davis is a much better fundraiser and
political spin doctor than he is a Governor, but lately he is taking the
spin way too far. He is so desperate to find villains with whom he can
deflect focus from his own record that he continues to ignore facts. Here is
my effort to set the record straight on several of the Governor's, and his
lackeys, recent
pronouncements on energy and the budget.
Energy:
MYTH:  "All Texans are evil"
His spokesman said, "Anywhere they wear cowboy hats, they probably have
handkerchiefs across their face because they are robbing us blind."
Why he said it: George Bush is from Texas and is a convenient scapegoat.
FACT: Only 2 of the 12 largest energy suppliers to California are from Texas
and they provide only 9% of the state's energy use.

MYTH:  "Private power generators charged California the most"
Governor Davis said, "What's going on here, pure and simple, is
unconscionable price-gouging by the big energy producers."
Why he said it: Polls show that it is easier to blame power generators for
the energy crisis than anyone else. FACT: The private company power
generators charged substantially lower prices over the last few months for
energy than the public agencies.  In fact, documents recently released
reveal that Enron and Mirant averaged $181 and $225 per megawatt while LADWP
and Sacramento Municipal averaged $292 and $330 for energy sold to the state
during the first quarter of this year.

MYTH:  "Power companies manipulated prices"
Governor Davis said,  "Their testimony could be the "smoking gun" that
demonstrates there was improper manipulation of California's electricity
market."
Why he said it: another way to say, "its not my fault, its their fault"
FACT: Duke energy shut its plant down because it was ordered to, in order to
balance the grid, by the California ISO, an entity overseen entirely by
Davis appointees.
Budget:
MYTH:  "Republicans want to cut education spending"
A lead education appointee said, "We feel very strongly that agreeing to
that would put us in a position where children would lose." Why it was said:
he needs to think of something to justify his tax increase. FACT:
Republicans have never proposed cuts in education out of the current budget.
We have instead proposed reducing pork, entirely new or expanded
programs, and cutting funded but vacant bureaucratic positions.

MYTH:  "The $1.2 billion sales tax increase is not a tax increase"
The Governor said, "They've just invented this argument about a tax
increase. It's just nonsense. It's not a tax increase."
Why he said it: he wants to maintain the illusion of being a fiscal
conservative FACT: One year ago, when the sales tax was cut, Davis had a
news conference announcing "This tax decrease will benefit every
Californian.  It will put even more of our prosperity in the hands of those
who created it in the first place - the taxpayers of this State." Now, when
the same tax goes up, it is not a tax increase?
I will let you figure out for yourself whether or not these myths are indeed
myths -- I only hope that you won't be using the Governor's statements for
your facts.

Until next week, that's all for this week.

John Campbell

Feel free to forward this e-mail to a friend!

If you wish to be taken off this e-mail list, please notify me.
Jennifer Cowen, District Director
Assemblyman John Campbell, 70th District
949.863.7070
949.863.9337 fax


FYI......

We are not bringing in prompt month value tonight.  Texas did, about $25,000.  The other regions don't have what we need for demand charges, etc. and no one has taken any time to research the values yet.  The other groups we need have been gone for hours.  We have some large positions which I don't really think are right.  I'll look closer in the morning.

Hope you feel better soon, at least you have all weekend to recover.

See you Monday,

Kam
: )


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/06/2001 07:23 PM ---------------------------

Victor Vega
03/06/2001 01:33 PM
To: LshepherdEco@aol.com, Larry Snyder@EES, Todd Peterson@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Last report

Could any of you help me in answering these questions?

Victor
---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Vega/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/06/2001 02:29 PM ---------------------------

"Robert Arvedlund" <robert.arvedlund@ferc.fed.us> on 03/06/2001 12:05:00 PM
To: <Victor.Vega@enron.com>
cc: <gcurran@enron.com>

Subject: Last report

Item 5 under Significant Plant Modifications Proposed says you are  examining
design changes required to install a mooring line tension meter and  ship
approach velocity meter on the dock(???).
?
What is the rationale for why you feel these two items are needed and can
you tell me how they work and what happens if they measure beyond some set
point.? What are the set points you want to measure and why??  Thanks.


Mark--Here is the legal risk memo on the PSCo PPA.  I am also excepting below
the two sections of the Agreement that present the timing issue that Dave
Delaney noted regarding the PSCo  condition precedent for CPUC approval
having a date of Dec. 21, while the ENA conditions for Board approval and
satisfaction of due diligence having a date of Dec. 1.

PSCO's dates for CPUC approval:

6.4 (A) PSCo shall have made commercially reasonable efforts to obtain any
required approvals of the CPUC as described in Section 18.2(B) and, on or
before December 21, 2000, shall have provided written notice to Seller
stating either (i) that PSCo has obtained such approvals from the CPUC in
final form, not subject to agency rehearing, without conditions materially
modifying this PPA, or (ii) that PSCo waives the requirement for such
approvals; provided, that if PSCo has not provided such notice to Seller on
or before December 12, 2000, then the Commercial Operation Milestone Date for
completion of construction and availability of the fifth and sixth turbines
in the Facility shall be extended, on a day-for-day basis, for each day after
December 12, 2000, through and including December 21, 2000, that PSCo has not
provided such notice to Seller .  Any extension of the Commercial Operation
Milestone Date for the fifth and sixth turbines in the Facility pursuant to
this Section 6.4(E) shall run concurrently with, and shall not be in addition
to, any extension of the Commercial Operation Milestone Date under any other
provision of this PPA.

18.1 (A) This PPA is subject to review by the CPUC as part of PSCo's final
1999 Electric Integrated Resources Plan (&IRP8).  Under the CPUC IRP Rules,
the Commission must approve PSCo's proposed resource acquisition portfolio,
of which this PPA is one part.  The CPUC may also review this PPA to
determine whether it is consistent with the Request for Proposals issued by
PSCo on January 28, 2000.  PSCo shall use its best efforts to obtain CPUC
approval of its IRP and, if necessary, Commission approval of this PPA, as
soon as reasonably practicable.  PSCo shall have the right to terminate this
PPA by notice to Seller at any time on or before December 21, 2000 as a
consequence of the failure of the CPUC to approve the IRP or this PPA by that
date, and shall in any event be required to provide the notice set forth in
Section 6.4(E).  Absent such notice by PSCo on or before December 21, 2000,
this contingency shall be deemed waived and this PPA shall remain in full
force and effect thereafter.

ENA's dates fpr Board approval and due diligence:

6.4 (A) Seller shall have received all necessary internal approvals,
including, without limitation, the approval of Seller,s and Enron Corp.,s
respective Boards of Directors according to such criteria as may be deemed
appropriate by such governing bodies, provided that if Seller does not
provide written notice to PSCo on or before December 1, 2000, stating that
Seller has been unable to satisfy this condition (despite its due diligence
to do so) and that this PPA and the other Project Agreements are therefore
terminated, then this condition shall be deemed to have been satisfied;
(B) Seller shall have completed, to Seller's reasonable satisfaction, a due
diligence review of the Site and all matters related thereto, including
suitability, access, land use, zoning, permitting, noise, environmental,
transmission access, fuel supply, utilities, and any similar or related
matters with respect to the Site, provided that if Seller does not provide
written notice to PSCo on or before December 1, 2000,  stating that Seller
has been unable to satisfy this condition (despite its due diligence to do
so) and that this PPA and the other Project Agreements are therefore
terminated, then this condition shall be deemed to have been satisfied;

As I said, the deal team intends to meet with PSCo next Wednesday Nov. 8 to
attempt to amend the Agreement to match our off-ramp dates with the PSCo PUC
offramp date, but the above provisions are the terms of the existing executed
PPA.  If you have any questions, please call.
 Al Larsen


Please put the dates referenced below on my calendar.  You may need to get
more details from Lexi.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001 09:52 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lexi Elliott @ ENRON                           02/01/2001 03:10 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: OU Scholarships

I think it would be great if you could attend on both dates.  However, the
more important of the two would be March 6 as that would allow you to hear
the students interview and assess their skills.

There is a slim chance that Mike could attend the event in April.  Jody Crook
plans on attending that event, too.  I will be at both events, so there will
be an Enron face at both events.

Please let me know if you will be available.

Thank you,

Lexi

	From:  Sally Beck @ ECT                           02/01/2001 03:03 PM

To: Lexi Elliott/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: OU Scholarships

This looks great.  Do you need me for either of those two dates?

How was dinner last night?   Sorry that I couldn't stay, but I know that the
students were in good hands.  Who else attended from Enron?  --Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lexi Elliott @ ENRON                           01/29/2001 05:32 PM

To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacqueline
Coleman/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: OU Scholarships

Mike and Sally:

I have been in contact with Ted Jacobs and have volunteered $1500 in
scholarship funds to be awarded by Enron this spring.  By volunteering this
money, we are now able to attend scholarship interviews on Tuesday, March 6
on campus.  This will provide us with the opportunity to target candidates
for next fall and lay the groundwork for a more competitive future.

After we have identified our scholarship recipients, we are invited to
present our awards at the Scholarship Awards Banquet on Friday, April 20.

Ted will (if he has not already) approach you, Mike, to see if you are
interested in playing a role at this event.   If you are available to attend,
please let me know.  I plan to have at least 2 Enron representatives at the
event.

I just wanted to give each of you these details to keep you fully informed of
our efforts on campus.  If you have any questions or suggestions, please let
me know.

Thank you,

lexi
3-4585


Re: CNBC Advance Notice: Decimal-based Pricing

I want to advise you that as of this Monday, Aug. 28, CNBC will begin
displaying all quotes and price changes in decimals (dollars and cents)
instead of fractions.

As you know, the securities industry as a whole is headed towards decimal -
based pricing.  Both the NYSE and the NASDAQ plan to gradually change over
to decimals to comply with the SEC's mandate of total decimal conversion by
April 9, 2001.  By making the full move to decimals all at once, we are
preparing CNBC viewers for this eventual industry-wide changeover.

I welcome any comments from you or others in your organization about these
changes or other aspects of CNBC coverage.   Please let me know if you would
like to be removed from our ongoing notification list or add others in your
organization.

When you click on the link below you will be able to see four summary slides
that illustrate our new decimal-based formats, as they will appear on
Monday, and access a form to provide feedback..

http://www.cnbc.com/decimal <http://www.cnbc.com/decimal>

Best regards,

Bill


Tim, sorry for the delay - lets talk if you think it is warranted.  I can see
a lot of positives to take this path. However,  there are a) pr issues and b)
we have hoards of on-going litigation that cost us a bundle.  We should make
this decision very carefully.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
03:06 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Tim Belden                           11/13/2000 07:22 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Plan Questions

The total depreciation plan number for west trading is $278,000.  Here is the
general breakdown

    Net Book Value  Planned Amount  Depreciation Period
Floor Buildouts   $462,000  $135,000   3 to 5 years
PC's and Monitors  $214,000  $50,000    3 years
Large Plasma Screens  $77,000   $46,000    3 years
Other    $25,000   $7,000    3 years
2001 Increase      $40,000

Total    $778,000  $278,000

Here is the headcount breakdown:

   Current   2001 Plan  Change  Realistically
Trading   41   48   +7  +5   (2 RT, 2 analysts on desk, 1 admin.)
Mid Mkt & Svcs  9   12   +3  +1 or +2  (increase coverage)
Fundamentals  7   9   +2  +1   (supply person with hydro knowledge)
Structuring  0   0   0  +2   (group is 4 -- Chris planned half, I need to
plan for half)

Totals   57   69   +12  +9 or +10

It looks like my number is two or three too high.  We also had a mixup on
planning for the existing structuring group.  Let me know if you have any
questions.

Also,  I need to talk to you about the City of Vernon.  I want to sue them.
Several months ago they flaked on a purchase that has cost us about
$10,000,0000.  Richard Sanders has done the basic legwork and it looks like
we have a decent case.  I talked to Chris about it, and we both agree that it
doesn't hurt the west business if we poke them in the eye.  They are not well
liked in the muni community out here, so the collateral damage should be
minimal.  The big question is how will this appear in the face of all of the
ongoing investigations?  Perhaps we should set up a call with me, you, Lavo,
Sanders, Calger, and Kean?  Let me know your thoughts.

Tim
503-464-3820


ok

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:12 AM
To:	Harris, Steven
Cc:	Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	Vacation Days

I am planning on taking vacation on the following days:

	1/2 day		Monday morning, 1/28
	2 days		Thursday & Friday, 1/31 & 2/1 (Sam's school is closed)

Please let me know if there are any conflicts with this schedule.

Thanks,
Lindy


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 03:09 PM -----

	Jeffrey McClellan
	08/09/2000 02:50 PM

		 To: Jeffrey McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: (bcc: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Reminder: HAPPY HOUR TOMORROW (THURS)

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey McClellan/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000
02:53 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey McClellan
08/09/2000 02:49 PM
To: Jeffrey McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Reminder: HAPPY HOUR TOMORROW (THURS)


Louise, I know that you are dealing with more important things now but I wanted to keep you up to speed on TBG and VNG as I continue to move them forward.

Have completed negotiations on TBG.  Plan to forward execution documents on Monday.  Upon TBG's execution I will determine if we want to move forward , delay or terminate the opportunity. I will get with you on this.
I have negotiated a $2 million payment from Sequent to terminate the Asset transaction 1 year early.  Traders believe this is strong value and are willing to transact at that value.  Waiting on formal/written offer from Sequent to complete evaluation.

Will keep you posted on these opportunities.
I hope that you are doing alright given the circumstances

Frank


FYI
----- Forwarded by Eric Benson/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 10:01 AM -----

	webmaster@cera.com
	05/11/2001 09:54 AM

		 To: insights@cera.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: The Battle of the Destination Clauses - CERA Decision Brief

Title: The Battle of the Destination Clauses
URL: http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2378

EUROPEAN GAS REPORT-THE BATTLE OF THE DESTINATION CLAUSES
The next round in the long war over competition in European gas is being
fought
on a new battleground-destination clauses that sit within (or alongside) many
long-term contracts for gas supply in Europe. The Directorate General for
Competition of the European Commission (DG COMP) recently said it has been
investigating several long-term take-or-pay contracts for over a year to make
sure that destination clauses fall in line with European Union (EU)
competition
laws.

* The abolition of territorial restriction clauses would be a prelude to more
widespread renegotiation of long-term take-or-pay contracts and would bring
genuine competition in European gas markets.

* In parallel with the pressure from the competition authorities, new
commercial opportunities appear to be opening up, notably in the
Mediterranean,
bringing further pressure to bear on the destination clauses.

**end**

Follow the URL above for the complete report.

E-mail Category: Decision Brief
CERA Knowledge Area(s): European Gas,

***********************************************************************

CERA's Spring 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas are now available
at http://www20.cera.com/event

***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Jeff,
I work with Jennifer Fraser and was asked to contact you with regards to a fuel oil call that we sold Hydro Quebec a while ago. I would like to find out whether or not we are in the notification period (I think we are) and what kind of paper work that needs to get done if we are.

Regards,

Richard Lassander
x57600


Ryan,  If you've got another taker for the tix, go ahead and let them go.
The dryspell continues.

	Ryan.F.Ruppert@EXXON.sprint.com
	12/14/2000 09:30 AM

		 To: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sorry

         Date: December 14, 2000
         From: Ruppert, Ryan F.                            R9RUPPE  - AMERICAS
           To: EXT-GERALD.NEMEC(A)ENRON.COM,               GERALDNE - FPEXMAIL
      Subject: Sorry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gerald,

Sorry for the call in the middle of the night.  My well is drilling and I
asked them to call me if they got an oil show.  The well should reach total
depth on Sunday so you might want to turn your ringer off in the bedroom
until then.

-Ryan

Ps.  Are you in for the Christmas Carol at the Alley tomorrow?  I need to get
rid of the tickets.

RYAN F. RUPPERT
West Texas Geoscience
U.S. West Production
ExxonMobil Production Co.


Duncan and Kristen are coming Saturday.  I don't know about the Rodeo.  Over.


Inner or near loop men. I would like to car pool, but may have to go
straight to the function. Have mediation starting in Beaumont at 3 today.
Figure I'll work until 5 1.5 hour drive back. I'll try to cell call when
heading back to explore possiblity of car pool with. e.

>From: "Fenner, Chet" <Chet_Fenner@bmc.com>
>To: "'Brian Constantine'" <brianc@saltgrass.com>,   "Fenner, Chet"
><Chet_Fenner@bmc.com>, Erik Wollam <erwollam@hotmail.com>,
>knipe3@msn.com, c.r.zander@att.net, Joe.Parks@enron.com,
>john.chambers@bisys.com
>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:41:27 -0600
>
>I will have to bring another MAN to our event in order to break my previous
>"family-on-family" event into a "we will MAN-off and let the family go do
>whatever the hell they want" night.  A couple of you know him already --
>Dave Weiland, and he'll be in town that night.  Otherwise, we'll just go to
>Tony's by ourselves, for whoever's interested in that route.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:39 PM
>To: Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net;
>Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com
>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>
>
>OK...fine....did everyone get that? Fantastic. Who the f%k is going?>tomorrow, dammit? Where the HELL is Chad (Monkey-Noise Boy)? No responses?>from anyone? Wake up MEN... I will be leaving the office shortly, so call?>cell to RSVP...713-817-1661. I would prefer a 'thread" until such time that?>I leave (one o'clockish).?>?>-----Original Message-----?>From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]?>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:32 PM?>To: Brian Constantine; Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com;?>c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?>?>I think it has to do w/ evolution of phrases.  In the 12th century, the?>phrase was "hairier than a butt tick" (which doesn't make sense unless you?>trace it back to days when man invented the three point stance), but went?>through a series of common usefulness in differing global regions, ending ?>in?>Northern Iceland (where the women are beautiful, but it is very cold - get?>the idea?).  The phrase didn't change much from there until the Salem Witch?>Trials.  What I'm trying to figure out is how it ended-up at a rodeo.?>?>Ok, hope that helps. I gotta get back to my oh-so-useful mgmt training?>class.?>?>-----Original Message-----?>From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]?>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:26 PM?>To: Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net;?>Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?>?>?>Hare is correct...how about "cold as a witch's tit". What the hell is that??>Someone said that last night at the rodeo and I'm still trying to figure?>that one out. Heard it many times before, but like you, have never thought?>to "overthink" such a quote. I'm very confused and getting angrier by the?>minute...?>?>-----Original Message-----?>From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]?>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:20 PM?>To: Brian Constantine; Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com;?>c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?>?>isn't it hide nor "hare"?  I really don't know, and can't make sense out of?>it all. I've been paying attention to phrases lately that just don't make?>sense.  Like chocolate thunderbolt, baby.  It's a stretch to make it work,?>but oh so fitting for the setting.?>?>Do you know what I want??>?>-----Original Message-----?>From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]?>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:13 PM?>To: Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net;?>Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?>?>?>Chet...is that a proper RSVP? Can't make hide nor hair outta that. Are you?>IN? or not? C'mon dude, make it happen...?>?>-----Original Message-----?>From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]?>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:10 PM?>To: Brian Constantine; Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com;?>c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?>?>Man, now I'm upset.  My "buddy" up here said he'd get a group of his "team"?>together for that night as well.  After a few margaritas, it won't really?>matter what happens. C'mon, man. What??>?>I'll bring my pickle packets.?>?>-----Original Message-----?>From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]?>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:06 AM?>To: Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net;?>Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?>?>?>Make it happen, Chetuck. BTW...whatever happened to your reply about our?>impending "foursome"??? Very "excited"  about the opportunity...?>?>OK...this is the final and definitive MAN NIGHT agenda...it WILL NOT ?>CHANGE,?>heretofore.?>?>Where?- Tampico Mexican Seafood.  610 to Airline...Right on Airline, Go?>about 4 blocks, you will pass the Farmers Market and just past that will be?>Tampico. Queried Zander again about it this morning and he said they DO ?>have?>security and the clientele is an eclectic mix of Mexican day laborers?>drinking Mexican beer and those little packets of salt and lime, dining ?>next?>to large tables of rich blue-blood yuppie types...Good Fun. Kind of like a?>good noodle house or other oriental type place...if you see the natives?>eating there, you know it's good. Besides after listening to Joe and Chet, ?>I?>would agree that Tony's is ABSOLUTELY OUT OF THE QUESTION.?>?>When?- Thursday 2/28- 7:15 pm.?>?>Who?- Head count is as follows...Piggy, Lease Nazi, Captain Safety,?>Monkey-Noise Boy, Big Boy Chambers (?), Fenner-Weiner(?)?>?>MEN...please RSVP such that we can appropriately "sign" to the non-English?>speaking staff how many Ritas we need to order upon arrival.?>?>See you MEN at the MAN function, to do MAN-typical things.?>?>								PIGGY?>?>-----Original Message-----?>From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]?>Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:28 AM?>To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; Fenner, Chet;?>c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?>?>Eat me, Wollam.  Did you notice the "Out of Office" message from my email,?>home slice??>?>Not sure what the 20 "MAN NIGHT" emails are in my inbox from yesterday, but?>noted the Thurs. night dinner.  I have conflict which I will try to unwind?>for my attendance.  However, not sure that we want to be at Tony's on such?>night, based on what my co-worker says!?>?>-----Original Message-----?>From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]?>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:40 AM?>To: Brian Constantine; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com;?>c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com?>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?>?>I hear back from John more than I do Chet.?>Chad and I are going for noodles in a few minutes. Joe do you want to join?>us??>?>Brian, your in charge of the REVISED FINAL PLAN FOR MAN NIGHT. good luck.?>I'll go where I'm told. e.?>?>?> >From: "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com>?> >To: "Erik Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>, <knipe3@msn.com>,?> ><chet_fenner@bmc.com>, <c.r.zander@att.net>, <Joe.Parks@enron.com>,?> ><john.chambers@bisys.com>?> >Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> >Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:30:13 -0600?> >?> >Where is Chad?? Chet??? Does Chambers ever respond to anything...who is ?>he,?>?> >for that matter? For the love of God...?> >?> >-----Original Message-----?> >From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]?> >Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:27 AM?> >To: knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net;?> >Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com; Brian Constantine?> >Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> >?> >NO< NO< NO... this is now going to get way to confusing. WHo is going?> >anyway, just me and you Brian??> >?> >You need to make your pick and send out a REVISED FINAL PLAN after ?>hearing?> >from everyone.?> >?> >?> > >From: "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com>?> > >To: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>, "Erik Wollam"?> > ><erwollam@hotmail.com>, "Fenner, Chet" <Chet_Fenner@bmc.com>,?> > ><knipe3@msn.com>?> > >Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> > >Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:22:34 -0600?> > >?> > >According to E, that is indeed the case. I will roll the dice and go to?> > >Tampico (leave any valuables locked securely in your glove box). Set?> >alarm.?> > >?> > >-----Original Message-----?> > >From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]?> > >Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:15 AM?> > >To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com?> > >Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> > >?> > >yes, according to chet's co-worker?> > >	-----Original Message-----?> > >	From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]?> > >	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:14 AM?> > >	To: Parks, Joe; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com?> > >	Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> > >	Is Thursday night, "Man Night" for "those kinds of men" too????> > >?> > >	-----Original Message-----?> > >	From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]?> > >	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:09 AM?> > >	To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com?> > >	Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> > >?> > >	so your proposing we are going to the stabbing cabin. go to tampico?> > >		-----Original Message-----?> > >		From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]?> > >		Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:08 AM?> > >		To: Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com; Parks, Joe?> > >		Subject: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS?> > >?> > >		Men,?> > >?> > >		            The final descision on the night of men will be?>as?> >follows...?> > >?> > >		Where: Tony's Mexican (bring your own clown and accessories,?>please)?> > >?> > >		When: Thursday 2/28 at 7:15 pm.?> > >?> > >		We will wait until Zander is able to attend, to try the?>Tampico place.?> > >Would rather go w/ someone who knows the drill.?> > >?> > >		I am very much looking forward to seeing all of you men.?> > >?> > >?> > >                Pig-N-a-Stinky-blanket?> > >?> > >?> > >?>**********************************************************************?> > >	This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant?>affiliate?> > >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use ?>of?> > >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure?> >by?> > >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient ?>(or?> > >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or?> > >reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and?> >delete?> > >all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are?> >not?> > >intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or ?>evidence?> >a?> > >binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its?> > >affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not ?>be?> > >relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or ?>otherwise.?> > >Thank you.?> > >?>**********************************************************************?> >?> >?> >?> >?> >_________________________________________________________________?> >MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:?> >http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx?> >?>?>?>?>?>_________________________________________________________________?>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.?????_________________________________________________________________?Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


Hi Dede

Got your message - I would have loved to go; instead I was stuck on a
roller-coaster of an airplane for over 5 hours fighting a "terrific headwind"
according to the pilot.

See you at 11:00 unless I hear from you.

Elizabeth


Enron is in the process of re-negotiating our contract with Dow Jones
Interactive and we need to know if you are currently
accessing this data.  In the near future there will be a cost associated with
this information and you are currently listed as
having a license.

Please click on the below link and let us know if you need continued access
to this service.

http://nahou-webcl1.corp.enron.com/inquisite/DJI/DJI.html

Thank You,
Market Data


Book this deal very conservatively.  ie.  set the curve so you pay credit
reserve but show no income.  We will discuss in 2001.

John


---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001
10:19 AM ---------------------------

"Shankster JL (Luther)" <JLShankster@equiva.com> on 02/22/2001 10:07:34 AM
To: "'Lamphier, Gary'" <glamphi@enron.com>
cc: "Carter, John" <JCCarter@equiva.com>, "Ricks, Ruth"
<RARicks@equiva.com>, kyle.r.lilly@enron.com, mary.poorman@enron.com
Subject: March Nominations at Shell Deer Park

Gary,

March 2001 nominations for gas delivery to Shell Deer Park are as follows:

Firm Baseload - 75,000 MMBtu/d
Spot Swing supply - 0 (zero)

Delivery of the above contract quantities is expected to be as follows:

  HPL-HP   HPL-E   HPL-S
 Firm 15,000 MMBtu/d 25,000 MMBtu/d 35,000 MMBtu/d

Turnaround activity started in January is expected to be completed in the
second half of March.

Please let me know if you have any questions

J. Luther Shankster

Energy & Utilities Planning
> Phone: 713/277-9307
> Fax: 713/277-9941
> E-Mail: jlshankster@equiva.com
> Home Page: http://rsweb
>


All,

Attached is a presentation that I have put together to review EGM's
activities.  The purpose is to provide an information package on our
businesses for Senior mgt and Investor relations.  This will not be
distributed externally but will education people on our businesses and some
of our goals.

Please take a few minutes to briefly  review and make any comments and/or
changes and fax  or provide a hard copy back to me.  You can send me copies
of just the pages that have updates.  Also please focus on the map and insure
that there are not mistakes ( i found some recently).  There is also a
shorter version presentation that is more external and once I've updated
both, i will send everyone a copy via email for your reference and use.

Thanks,
mike


Chris,

Delete them.  We can do it on this end.

Thanks,
David

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:22 AM
To: yeary@thesearchcenter.com
Subject: RE: FW: Contact Information

Just a quick note on the information I've sent you.  The following two
lines deal with the activity I've been involved in since Dec 2, 2001.
Some of my coworkers have said I should leave these lines out.  What do
you think?

		*	Buy and sale gas for the Enron Estate Team.
		*	Provide commercial evaluations on post-petition
deals to legal counsel.

Also, I sit right in the middle of the pack so it is a little awkward to
talk if everyone is here like they were yesterday.

Thanks

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Lisa:

We don't have a master agreement in place with this CP, so it does NOT need
to receive a GTC override letter.  However, I would like you to revise this
CPs profile as ENRON Sales (regulated entity -- we haven't signed their
tariff) only.

Call me with any questions.

Leslie


Blanca Anderson
1310 Cadiz
New orleans, LA 70115
bandersn@loyno.edu

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Blanca Anderson


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Birgit D.Kamps" <birgit@hiresynergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:37 AM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	Birgit's Contact Info: 713-222-7667

Hi Daron,
You sure have a big fan in Scott Crowell! I look forward to meeting you and being your "eyes and ears" in the market-place! Some of the positions I'm currently conducting searches for include a Risk Managers (85-100K+B); power-plant accountants (50-60K+B); Gas Schedulers (55-70K. To help me better understand your interests, please take a few minutes to answer the following questions, and/or email me a copy of your resume (which I will help you up-date) so I can match you to opportunities.

1) Key requirements in your next position.

2) Main areas of expertise/ years experience (n/a if resume attached)

3) Current and desired compensation

4) Key reasons you would consider leaving your current employer & your level of urgency in making a move:

5) Companies you want to avoid working for and/or already have your resume:

6) Companies you're interested in:

7) Main achievements in your career (or we can cover this if we meet; our offices are located downtown on 723 Main Street, suite 511 at the corner of Main/Rusk, in the Houston Bar Center Bldg):

Please note that our team of 8 recruiters are Big 5 Alumni and CPAs specializing in Accounting (including Tax), Finance and Risk Management. I look forward to working with you in the near future and answering any questions you might have. You may reach me anytime at 713-222-7667, or we could schedule a time to talk in the evening. All our conversations will be completely confidential.

Best wishes,

Birgit D. Kamps
HireSynergy, Inc.
Partner/ Houston
(713) 222-7667 phone
(713) 222-7660 fax
723 Main Street, Suite 511
Houston, TX 77002
birgit@hiresynergy.com
www.hiresynergy.com

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


--

Welcome to the nyiso_tech_exchange mailing list!

Please save this message for future reference.  Thank you.

If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list,
you can send mail to <Majordomo@lists.thebiz.net> with the following
command in the body of your email message:

unsubscribe nyiso_tech_exchange

or from another account, besides lcampbel@enron.com:

unsubscribe nyiso_tech_exchange lcampbel@enron.com

If you ever need to get in contact with the owner of the list,
(if you have trouble unsubscribing, or have questions about the
list itself) send email to <owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net> .
This is the general rule for most mailing lists when you need
to contact a human.

Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to,
in case you don't already have it:

[Last updated on: Fri Jul 24 11:09:11 1998]

WELCOME to the NYISO Technical Information Exchange Service.  If you wish
to transmit information to the subscribers of the list simply send email to
the posting address:
nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net

Thank you,
Market Relations


Please plan to attend:

Management Committee Meeting
Friday, November 16
9:00 a.m. (Central)
50th Floor Boardroom
Video connection to London office

Thanks,
Joannie
3-1769


&Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path
and leave a trail.8  -  Ralph Waldo Emerson

Watch the Enron Building lobby on Thursday, April 26th, from 11:30am to
1:00pm for information
on Enron,s unique ways to express itself through our employee communicate
tools and our workplace environment.

Featuring:
eThink, Planet Enron, Expert Finder and GIS

Special Afternoon Workshop - 3:30pm to 5:30pm
&The Painting Experience8 with Mr. Stewart Cubley
You do not have to be an artist... no training or knowledge of art is
required....  simply participate in a unique,
supportive environment where you can explore the &process8 of creativity and
risk-taking completely free from the
barriers of comparison, evaluation, judgment, success, failure or awards.
The only prerequisite is a spirit of inquiry.
There is no fee for this class.  Please RSVP to Jessica at x31918 - space is
limited.

Word of the Day
verve (v-rv) n. Energy and enthusiasm in the expression of ideas,
especially in artistic performance or composition.


Hello again.  Thanks to those of you that have RSVP'd for our event.  If you
haven't and you would like to attend, please let us know.  We would love to
have you join us!

After what had already been a difficult year for you as an investor, the
tragic September 11 events only added to our concern for financial recovery.
While we certainly can't control events around us and the impact they have
on our investments, it is still important to remember that we must look past
short-term effects on the markets and think of our long-term goals.

We would like to invite you to join us for an evening out to talk candidly
about how we all must feel right now, the current market conditions, and
steps that we need to take to help us reach our financial goals.

We will address The Three E's - Emotions, Expectations and Economics:

? How to cope with investment emotions
? Education on asset allocation
? Education on long-term investing

Please join us for our Market Outlook Seminar, to be held on Tuesday October
30th from 6:30 to 7:45 at Romano's Macaroni Grill at 1155 Lake Woodlands
Drive in The Woodlands.  We encourage you to bring a guest - in fact, we
will have drawings for some free giveaways for clients that bring guests!

You will have the opportunity to hear Allen Kuhn, Regional Vice President of
Franklin Templeton Investments, discuss the current market and what you need
to be aware of for the future.  Also, we have a new assistant for you to
meet, Karen.  Karen came to work with us last October.  Some of you may have
already had an opportunity to talk with her.

Call Kathy at 281.367.8658 ext. 2234 soon to make your reservations, since
seats are limited. I look forward to seeing you soon.

Byron W. Ellis

"Make all you can, save all you can, give all you can."

				               JOHN WESLEY

Byron W. Ellis, CFP(tm), CLU, ChFC
Senior Financial Advisor
American Express Financial Advisors
IDS Life Insurance Company
1450 Lake Robbins Drive
Suite 100
The Woodlands, TX  77380

Phone	281.367.8658 ext. 2227
Fax	281.364.9628
E mail	byronellis@usa.net

 - winmail.dat


Andrea,

These deals have been changed to NYMEX swaps.

Thanks,

Errol, X5-8274

	From:  Andrea R Guillen @ ECT                           05/08/2001 02:17 PM

Sent by: Andrea R Guillen@ECT
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: V28710.1-2 & V28732.1-2

Hi,
 I received a call from BNP Paribas on these two EOL deals.
The trader at BNP talked to Dutch about changing the deals from Gas Daily to
Nymex
 please let me know
 Thanks Angie


This is a pre Board Meeting Walk-thru


"It's a Girl" performed by Weave Dance Company
Weave Dance Co. will perform May 24-26 at 8:00 p.m. at Stages Repertory
Theater, 3201 Allen Parkway at Waugh, Call 713-52STAGE for tickets.  This
performance, called "It's a Girl!" celebrates pregnancy and motherhood.

Donations to the Houston Area Women's Center will be collected at the
performance.  Any of the following items are welcome:  non-perishable,
pre-packaged healthy food snacks such as granola bars and boxed juices, baby
supplies such as formula, diapers, wet wipes, baby lotion, baby shampoo,
pacifiers, socks, plastic bottles, diaper bags, crib sheets for portable
cribs and swim suits and flip flops for children age 4 and older.

Star Wars: Films (May 4-25)
See all four completed films of the legendary Star Wars saga on the big
screen! The MFAH presents special editions of Episodes IV-VI and Episode I in
the newly renovated Brown Auditorium with Dolby Digital dts sound and stadium
seating.

Star Wars: Episode IV-A New Hope
Directed by George Lucas
(USA, 1977, 125 min.)
Friday, May 4, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, May 5, 11:00 a.m.

Star Wars: Episode V-The Empire Strikes Back
Directed by Irvin Kershner
(USA, 1980, 120 min.)
Friday, May 11, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, May 12, 11:00 a.m.

Star Wars: Episode VI-Return of the Jedi
Directed by Richard Marquand
(USA, 1983, 132 min.)
Friday, May 18, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, May 19, 11:00 a.m.

Star Wars: Episode I-The Phantom Menace
Directed by George Lucas
(USA, 1999, 133 min.)
Friday, May 25, 7:30 p.m.
Saturday, May 26, 11:00 a.m.

Tickets go on sale at the Brown Auditorium ticket booth 30 minutes before
show time. The ticket booth is located on the lower level of the Caroline
Wiess Law building.

General admission is $5. Matinee admission (show times before 5:00 p.m.) is
$4. Enron employees with ID receive a $1 discount. Discount passes (10
admissions) are $40 for nonmembers and $35 for members. Children 5 and under
are free. Films are screened in Brown Auditorium in the museum's Caroline
Wiess Law building, 1001 Bissonnet.  Free parking is available.  For more
information, please call 713-639-7515 or visit our website at www.mfah.org.

Mark Your Calendars!...Bring Your Child To Work Day will be Friday, June
29th.  More details to come...See Volunteer section below to for volunteer
opportunities!

Join us in Dublin or Honolulu ----Joints in Motion is a marathon training
program for walkers and runners that is aligned with a fundraising effort for
the Arthritis Foundation - Please call for more information at
713-529-0800.

Many volunteers are needed to help with the planned activities for the Enron
Children on June 29th.  If you're interested, send your name and phone
extension to workperks.enron.com.

Support KidSave and Help Miracles Happen. Every Summer.

Kidsave,s  Summer Miracles Program enables orphaned children ages 5 to 11 to
travel to the  US and Canada, live with families and attend day camp. The
program gives  families who may be concerned about the problems of adopting
an older child a chance to meet, get to know and in the best-case scenario,
fall in love with a  child. The program gives prospective parents an
opportunity to see and evaluate  first-hand the challenges and rewards of
adopting an older  child.

In 1999 and  2000 Kidsave and adoption agency partners placed 432 children -
96 percent of  children who participated in the program. Generally, 85 to 90
percent of  children who participate in the program find homes easily through
the program.  The remaining 10 to 15 percent require more work.

Kidsave  believes every child deserves a family. We are committed to placing
all children  who participate in the Summer Miracles Program in permanent
families or  family-like environments.

We are looking  for families to host children, and for others who want to
help us make the camp  program happen for these 250 children.   As a
non-profit organization, Kidsave depends on donations to raise the  money to
bring these children here and find them families.  Please call Tonya Hoppe at
281.286.8948  or tonya@tonya.cc to get involved in Houston,s  Kidsave
program.

Enron and Kidventure Camps are proud to bring you Camp Enron Summer 2001.
Celebrating our third year, Camp Enron  will once again be providing summer
camp for children, ages 5-13, of Enron employees and contractors.

This year, camp will be May 29-August 10.  Ten, one-week sessions will be
available and families may choose to attend any or all sessions.  Each camp
week is Monday through Friday.

The cost is $150 per week and includes all transportation, field trips and
activities.  A deposit of $50 per week is all that is needed to reserve your
sessions.   The deadline to register is Monday, May 21.

To register, log on to: http://www.kidventurecamp.com/camp_enron.htm.
Spaces are limited.

Enron parents simply ride to work with  their children and check them in to
the Energizer in the morning with the Camp Enron Team.  Enron Campers are
loaded on Coach USA Buses and transported to our nearby camp. At the end of
the day campers are brought back to the Energizer for parents to check out.

It's that easy!

For more information please contact:

web site: www.kidventurecamp.com
call Kidventure: 713.960.8989
e-mail: camps@kidventurecamp.com

Have News to Share?
To post news or events in Enron In Action, please e-mail your information to
EIA@enron.com
no later than 12:00 noon the Thursday prior to the next Monday,s mailing.


As of 10:00 AM Thursday pipeline reports indicate that all of our resubmitted
nominations have been confirmed by the pipelines and our counterparties and
will be scheduled correctly.  These nominations were resubmitted on the first
Intraday cycle (6:00 PM on the day prior to flow).

As a result I do not expect any monetary impact from yesterdays outage. I
will keep you posted if anything further develops.

Bob Superty x30957


Attached is the weekly credit file sorted and filtered as usual.  There are
about 30 new 'No Physical Trade' deals out there since last week. A lot are
with PG&E -- they have made another prepayment and we are allowed to trade
(EOL only) with them again.


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
01:26 PM ---------------------------
From: Richard Reichardt@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 10/10/2000 12:30 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Lawyer/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tom Gros/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Garland/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Richard DiMichele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
Subject: Seismic Data on Oil & Gas field Development via Satellite

Mike,

Using NASA satellite transmission of maritime data and establishing a Houston
Data Center to consolidate and centrally process 3D seismic data surveys for
oil and gas extraction, exploration and development could save the petroleum
industry more than $300 million dollars annually through reduced operational
expenses.  Added value in shortening the time to process and deliver the
finished surveys should generate more than $26 million per site (based upon
$15/barrel for average oil well production to market 30 days sooner)in
revenue.  By re-selling this data to market analysts or by internally using
this data for forecasting future oil/gas production Enron could increase the
accuracy of forecasting reserves and production capabilities globally.  By
holding the data as exclusive (or partially exclusive), Enron would have a
significant market advantage in futures pricing for oil and gas.(Vince's team
is quantifying the valuation of this information)

Attached please find an updated version of the business case for seismic data
transfer via satellite, by a geophysicist at SpaceData - William K. Aylor,
calculated using $22/barrel oil.

Based upon your availability, Jon Adler and I would like to make a
presentation to you (or your designated representative) on the Enron
potential of this opportunity, sometime next week (17-20 October).

 - SDT Business Case4.pdf

V.R.,

Richard Reichardt
Enron Broadband Services
(713)-345-8377 (Office)
(713)-907-3767 (Mobile)
1400 Smith Street, Suite EB 4364
Houston, Texas  77002


Jeff Donahue heads up the Corp. Development group for ENA, which Don Miller
and I work in.  Jeff is Don's supervisor and Don is mine.  I have been with
this group since around May.  Thanks for the quick action with this.
Regards,
Ben


Dawn:

I am resending this - I forgot the Staffing Summary by Location.

Sorry!

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 07/07/2000
03:03 PM ---------------------------

	Dawn Derr @ ENRON
	07/07/2000 10:45 AM

To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 2001 Headcount information

Shirley,

Get it to me as soon as you can.  thanks.

dawn

Shirley Crenshaw@ECT
07/07/2000 09:11 AM
To: Dawn Derr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2001 Headcount information

Dawn:

I apologize, I have not been able to pin Vince down.  However, he did take
it with him this morning (he will be in PRC meetings all day.) and I told him\
you needed it yesterday.

I hope it is not too late.  Let me know.

Thanks

Shirley

	Dawn Derr @ ENRON
	07/05/2000 04:09 PM

To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2001 Headcount information

Shirley,

I need the headcount information for Vince's group no later than Thursday,
July 6.  Let me know if this is a problem.

Dawn


Should you have any HR Issues please direct them to Jeanie Slone per Kim Melodick...thanks for your help.

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cramer, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:45 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: referenced paper by Akerlof

Thank You.

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaminski, Vince J
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Cramer, Chris
Cc:	'vkaminski@aol.com'; Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject:	RE: referenced paper by Akerlof

Chris,

I shall get a copy of the book on Monday and will get a copy of the paper  for
you.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cramer, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	referenced paper by Akerlof

Mr. Kaminski,

Your reference to Mr. Akerlof's article interested me. How could I obtain a copy so that I can read it in its entirety?

Thanks and Best Regards,

Chris Cramer


Approved.


FYI - what do you all think?
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 12/20/99 08:19
AM ---------------------------
From: Dave Nommensen on 12/17/99 05:29 PM
To: Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: purge of old Contract_Event_Status

Just to clarify, its not the relative age of the production date, but the age
of the event itself.

d.n.

To: George Smith, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: purge of old Contract_Event_Status

Do any of you see a problem with limiting this to the current month or
current month +1
Need to know soon

Scotty

	From:  Dave Nommensen                           12/17/99 03:25 PM

To: Scotty Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Trisha Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benedicta Tung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane E
Niestrath/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave McMullan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: purge of old Contract_Event_Status

Scotty/Richard,

Our DBAs would like to see what we can do to reduce the qty of rows in
Contract_Event_Status.  We have over 1 Gig of data in that table.  I would
like to suggest we have a nightly or weekly or monthly process to delete any
row with a Last_Mod_Date over a month (or two) old.  So if someone balances
February 1999 this month, we will keep it around for a month (or two).

Does any one else have a desire to keep this data for a shorter/longer period
of time?

This is not an audit table.  This is just a "log" every nom/track/balance/EDI
send/Fax send/sched qty/quick response since the beginning of time.

d.n.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 6:27 PM
To:	Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Lebrocq, Wendi; Global Emerging Businesses; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 11-26-01

Please see attached.

Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


Eric, is this still a problem or did you get what you needed?
m

Eric Gonzales
12/04/2000 06:45 AM
To: Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Re: Jose LNG - Crude Pricing

Our ability in crude is apparently very poor.  What can J Wilson do thru
2010?  I want the crude desk to make us a price and present an acceptable
volume.

If we have to suggest to PDVSA only doing a crude index through 2012, I
strongly believe we should try if we can create some additional value thru
this structure.  Tell me if you would like me to give him a call to explain
what the effort potentially create.

Thanks
Eric

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Eric Groves                           30/11/2000 17:04

To: Guido Caranti/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Emilio
Vicens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Jose LNG - Crude Pricing

 Per a conversation I had with John Wilson the head crude oil trader in the
Houston office, the feasability of hedging price risk linked to WTI or Brent
on a 20 year deal is NOT a possibility.  If we had 1/3 of our GSA price
linked to Brent our exposure for 20 years would be about 30 million barrels
notional or about 14 million barrels PV.  At 5% our exposure would still be 5
million notional or 2.3 million PV.  According to John, he would not be
comfortable doing anything past 2012 and even out that far he would not
consider doing more than about 1 million PV barrels in the years 2010 -
2012.  Given these comments, I would say that the size of our deal basically
precludes a look at Crude Oil hedges at this time.  As far as the economics
of the deal are concerned, we basically cannot even get an Offer to use to
figure out our economics.  I am confident that if we pushed the issue to see
if we could get a 20 year offer even for a small portion of the volumes that
the hedging costs would be too high, and therefore have left it at that for
the time being.   Please advise if you have any thoughts on the issue.

Thanks,

Eric

Guido Caranti@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/29/2000 09:27 AM
To: Eric Gonzales/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Emilio Vicens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt@ECT, Larry
Lawyer/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, Cris Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Jose LNG - Off-take Comments

Eric, thanks for your comments. Please see below in blue our observations and
answers. Let's talk later today if you have further questions.

Saludos

Guido and Emilio

Enron Offtake Agreement

Section 2
Should this agreement start at commercial hand over of the plant under the
EPC agreement.  Benefit here is LDs under the EPC for late delivery go to
project company and project company has no obligation to lng buyers.  In
addition it preserves your 20 year offtake which should still match your GSA.

 The agreement should start at commercial hand over of the plant as you say.
The draft as it is now has only outer limits as to when that should happen
(that being the earlier of 40 months after Financial  Close or NTP or Dec 31
2004). We will add to this list "the earlier of" something like: "the date on
which the plant has produced LNG at at least 90% of its capacity for a period
of 10 consecutive days". We suggest putting something like this as opposed to
"commercial hand over" because this is in the plant's/contractor's control
and they could, for example, on purpose not meet a noise level requirement
for 4 months  for example and delay commencement of the offtake contract
while the project sells LNG at higher prices than in the term sheets.

With regards to the EPC LDs we agree that they should go only to the project
but we, as offtakers, can not wait for ever for the project to be completed
with out receiving gas or damages for something that is somehow (directly or
indirectly) under the project's control. We have 4 months limits to how much
the project can be delayed on top of all the conservatism that EECC (or
another EPC Contractor) already built in.

Section 6
I would like to see some language in this section describing the pricing
formula associated with expansions.  Structure could be set as in this
contract where Pg is to reflect GSA costs and where the combined value of
Pcpi and Pa should be derived to provide an equity return to the sponsors of
18%.

 We agree that would be better, but we included this section knowing that is
something that is going to be a very difficult sell with PDVSA, because they
don't want us to sell down and then keep "controlling" new  LNG businesses in
Jose. They will oppose this clause as they violently opposed the limited
exclusivity at Jose that we managed to include in the GSA. We think that
adding a restriction to the asset's returns now in the draft will make it
very tough to sell to PDVSA the entire Clause. Thus, jeopardizing our chance
to control the output of future plants or expansions. We never intended to
use these off-take agreements as a vehicle to control future LNG volumes.
Nevertheless, we felt it was a good chance for us to start getting partial
control of the output. Pushing it too much will back fire and PDVSA will
clearly realize what our intent is.

Section 7
Where is the bonus calculation?  We did not include it now on purpose. We
will include it when ever they "remind" us to do so. We want to have another
fight about the bonus.
Where is the min price? The minimum price is in. We say that one of the
terms in the price is Pg x En where En is never less than one
I thought you guys were going to trade out CPI for a fixed number? We are
going to try to do it, but that is first a GSA issue, and we don't want to
put it here as something firm before we change it in the GSA. We precisely
bracketed the CPI percentage in the formula because of our thought that we
want to make it zero
Have you decided that a WTI index percentage does not help the economics? No,
we don't have the definitive answer from structuring yet, but our guess and
based on our meeting with RAC the other day, in which they told us about the
mess created by an oil escalation in Cuiba (Brazil power plant), we are
pretty much convinced that oil escalation without oil based LNG sales is not
convenient. But since we don't have a definitive answer yet we still included
oil as a possible escalator with a zero weighting (that should have been
bracketed in the term-sheet, though, and it will).

Section 10
you have incorporated the GSA default rate for late payment as opposed to the
Equilibrium rate.  Is this your intent to have a mismatch?
 Yes, we did it on purpose because this will apply also to PDVSA as
off-taker, and they have a record of paying late so we want them to suffer if
they do.

you have all new taxes being borne by the project company.  Will the banks
accept this as the project company will be thinly capitalized.  See section
18 of the Arcos CTA for ideas if this is an issue.
 The exporter of record will be the project, so the buyer has no business in
Venezuela other than paying port fees. We do not see any kind of taxes that
could be imposed on Buyer by Venezuela that would eventually be transferred
to the project. Banks should be fine with this as this is a risk that
projects typically take all the time (the heavy crude projects are some
examples in Venezuela). In addition, the GSA provides for a number of reliefs
for the Project Company that will help Banks and equity holders to feel
safer. Although, a large portion of the underlying risk is always there.

Other
where are the LD calculations explained?  I think you need LDs for GSA
default and another for plant default.  GSA default should match LD's in GSA
contract less compensation to plant debt recovery.
 In stead of writing an explicit LD calculation our lawyers suggested that
the sole use of New York law to rule the deal was simpler and better. New
York law provides for full market based damages (market price of commodity
plus extra costs) which is the maximum you can get in a negotiation for an LD
clause. So, from a legal and commercial point of view we much rather have it
as it is. We are still discussing w/ Brent Price and Cris Sherman if this is
sellable to AA for MTM, but our initial view is that it should be since the
level of LD can not be better. GSA default is market based (provided that
PDVSA, as we expect, accepts the change we will propose) so the Project
Company will be able to pay market based damages. For interruption of gas
supply from PDV for Force Majeure reasons our insurance team is finding out
if the market will cover such risk so that the project can afford not being
relieved from performance in such event (this will obviously be to a maximum
dollar limit to be determined and for a maximum period of time, say 36 months
- we need time to give you precision on this, but some sort of coverage will
be available).

suppose the plant produces 5% less that it is supposed to due to design or
tech problems (not a FM issue) at commercial hand over.  What happens under
the offtake agreements?  Will the banks accept this revenue short fall?  Will
we have to create a reserve?  This may be a big issue with the banks for
technology reasons and lack of experience in this industry.
  Under the off-take agreements the project pays market based damages if it
does not meet the contracted volume. We believe that the contracted volume
that we included in the term sheets though has enough of a cushion for banks
and equity holders to bear the risk. We are contracting for contractually
guaranteed production under the EPC which is 3% lower than expected. On top
of that we are considering LNG production with the richest inlet gas possible
(meaning a lower LNG volume). This volume is 5% lower than the guaranteed
production with "Normal" or expected feed composition. Combining these two we
have a contracted quantity that is 8% lower than the expected production with
expected feed. On top of this it is important to note that every single LNG
plant in the world ended up with a production capacity that is at least 10%
above what was expected (mostly due to EPC Contractors and tech partners
making very safe assumptions on guaranteed volumes to avoid LDs). Also the
EPC contract being negotiated provides for pretty severe LD in case of
production shortfalls that are enough to pay for debt and make equity-holders
whole. They don't provide though, for damages payable under off-take
contracts (nobody will take this potentially huge exposure on LDs). However,
as we explained, we believe that this is a risk that is typically taken by
producers and that we have already taken a very conservative assumption in
the volume contracted and that should be beard by the Project Co. Banks will
most definitely also take a conservative volume assumption, as we already
did.

What happens if plant starts producing less for a few weeks until problem is
resolved? what compensation do the offtakers get? do the banks suffer here as
well?
 The term sheet establishes an annual quantity as the only standard to
determine failure to deliver by Seller. It also establishes that deliveries
should be at rates and intervals that are reasonably constant. The bottom
line is that the termsheets do not go into all the detail about timing of
defaults and price differentials. It sets, however, a reasonable standard by
which if at the end of the year seller did not deliver the full annual
quantity and a particular month can be identified where the deficiency occur
based on the "reasonable constant deliveries" provision, damages will be
payable based on prices during such month. Yes banks suffer here to the
extent that the cause of the short fall is not insurable.  Nevertheless,
short periods (weeks) of failures to deliver by seller will really not affect
the Project Company ability to pay the Banks.  It will have to be some
prolonged period for Banks to be affected.

Under a plant FM issue you may not get BI cover for the first 60 days.  Will
the banks accept this or will they want a reserve established.  Is this in
your model?
 We are not sure off what the banks are going to require in this regard
(although, we agree that some sort of reserve or LC is to be expected). Our
model assumes the cost of an LC for 6 month debt service (which should be
plenty). The issue here is if MTM is going to be able to live with the same
or longer grace period for damages to kick in under the termsheet and weather
damages (not BI) are insurable and to what extent if FM relief is not
permitted for MTM reasons. The question that follows is: if damages exceed
the insured limits in a FM event that does not relief the project from its
obligation to deliver, have the damages have to be senior to debt payments
for AA to allow MTM to be permitted? If this is so, are the banks going to be
willing to live with this?, probably not.

insert something on planned maintenance timing and scheduling.
 It is briefly covered in section 9 second paragraph. This will be expended
in later drafts once the PA is signed and we are home free with regard to
PDVSA.

insert termination section
 In light of the fact that we will end up being more of an off-taker than an
asset owner in this project our lawyers suggest that we will get better
protection if early termination is ruled by what is provided under NY law
than if we try to right an early termination clause. They point out also that
90% of LNG contracts are done in this way, having NY law rule the game. They
point out also that from the project point of view banks are very used to and
prefer having early termination be ruled by NY law.

put something in about the buyer willing to accept entering direct agreements
for financing requirements?
 We will

Eric Gonzales@ECT
11/28/2000 03:40 AM
To: Guido Caranti/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Emilio
Vicens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt
cc: Larry Lawyer/NA/Enron@Enron, Cris Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Jose LNG - Off-take Comments

Enron Offtake Agreement

Section 2
Should this agreement start at commercial hand over of the plant under the
EPC agreement.  Benefit here is LDs under the EPC for late delivery go to
project company and project company has no obligation to lng buyers.  In
addition it preserves your 20 year offtake which should still match your GSA.

Section 6
I would like to see some language in this section describing the pricing
formula associated with expansions.  Structure could be set as in this
contract where Pg is to reflect GSA costs and where the combined value of
Pcpi and Pa should be derived to provide an equity return to the sponsors of
18%.

Section 7
Where is the bonus calculation?
Where is the min price?
I thought you guys were going to trade out CPI for a fixed number?
Have you decided that a WTI index percentage does not help the economics?

Section 10
you have incorporated the GSA default rate for late payment as opposed to the
Equilibrium rate.  Is this your intent to have a mismatch?
you have all new taxes being borne by the project company.  Will the banks
accept this as the project company will be thinly capitalised.  See section
18 of the Arcos CTA for ideas if this is an issue.

Other
where are the LD calculations explained?  I think you need LDs for GSA
default and another for plant default.  GSA default should match LD's in GSA
contract less compensation to plant debt recovery.
suppose the plant produces 5% less that it is supposed to due to design or
tech problems (not a FM issue) at commercial hand over.  What happens under
the offtake agreements?  Will the banks accept this revenue short fall?  Will
we have to create a reserve?  This may be a big issue with the banks for
technology reasons and lack of experience in this industry.
What happens if plant starts producing less for a few weeks until problem is
resolved? what compensation do the offtakers get? do the banks suffer here as
well?
Under a plant FM issue you may not get BI cover for the first 60 days.  Will
the banks accept this or will they want a reserve established.  Is this in
your model?
insert something on planned maintenance timing and scheduling.
insert termination section
put something in about the buyer willing to accept entering direct agreements
for financing requirements?

Marketing Agreement
Lets talks about his one

Guido Caranti@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
22/11/2000 23:34
To: Cris Sherman@ECT, Larry Lawyer@Enron, Brent A Price@ECT, Eric Groves@ECT,
Eric Gonzales@ECT
cc: Les Webber/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Emilio
Vicens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Jose LNG - Off-take

I am enclosing a draft of the off-take termsheets to be included in the
Participation Agreement between Enron and PDVSA Gas. These termsheets will
rule the following transactions:

  a) Sale of LNG from the Project to an affiliate of  Enron for the plant's
output minus PDVSA's off-take

  b) Sale of LNG from the project to and affiliate of PDVSA Gas for the share
of volumes equivalent their equity participation in the Project Co

  c) Re-sale of LNG from the affiliate of PDVSA Gas to the Enron affiliate
for the volumes purchased by PDVSA according to b) above

Please let Emilio and I know your comments about them at your earliest
convenience. Please focus on issues with regard to our ability to MTM these
contracts, such as the force majeure clause. If you have any comments or
questions during the weekend you can reach me at 713 304-4264 or Emilio at
011 5814 330-9016. Otherwise we would like to discuss this with you on Monday.

Thanks for your input and happy Thanks-giving

Guido


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/06/99 09:10
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jackie.Chasey@bincny.com                           08/05/99 06:23 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT
cc: Bernie.Derlath@bincny.com, Joerg.Pfuhl@bertelsmann.de
Subject: Enron

Sara:

I attach a clean copy of the nondisclosure agreement, which I have dated as
of today.  As we discussed, if you fax a signed copy of the agreement to me
tomorrow, I'll have it signed on behalf of Bertelsmann and fax it back to
you.  We will then exchange originals by mail.  It has been a pleasure
working with you on this.

Regards,
Jackie

 <<Nondisclosure Agreement.doc>>

 - Nondisclosure Agreement.doc


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000 04:14 PM -----

	"Ken" <kckrisa@apex2000.net>
	09/29/2000 03:31 PM
	Please respond to kckrisa

		 To: "Gerald R. Nemec \(E-mail\)" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Final Letter to Wildhorse

Gerald,

here is the letter to Wildhorse in final form.  Waiting to here from you
before I send via fax and overnight.

Ken Krisa

 - Wildhorse ltr 9-29-00.doc


Please note the call-in data for the Staff meeting conference call tomorrow,
which is currently scheduled to take place:

 Date:   Thursday, March 22
 Time:   8:30 AM PST
 Call-in:  (888) 476-6127
 Host (Paul?): 853807
 Participants:  498527

Thanks in advance for your participation.

Joseph

	Joseph Alamo
	03/21/2001 02:13 PM

To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: STAFF MEETING REMINDER & AGENDA REQUEST

Please note this reminder & request for Agenda items for upcoming Staff
Meeting & conference call,
which is currently scheduled to take place:

 Date:  Thursday, March 22
 Time:  8:30 AM PST

Please forward your Agenda items to me, if any, as soon as possible.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation,

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


Don't forget about me.  I'm still trying to find out what it will take to move gas on and ENA tabs agreement.  No transportation at this point, just a tabs.  Also, it will be much easier for you guys to monitor because most of the deals will be monthly.


Hello all,

This is to alert or remind everyone that beginning today (4/30/01)
I will be taking over Bilal Bajwa's responsibilities of generating the morning
VAR and P&L reports.  Please contact me regarding the reports for the
next two months if you have any questions.

-Elizabeth Shim.
Office: (713) 853-0550 (ext 3-0550)
Home: (713) 523-7093
Cell: (713) 927-4782.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
? Of the four &Plan Bs8 introduced recently by California legislature, only
two proposals appear viable for SoCal, and surprisingly, PG&E.  The others
either establish vulture funds for when So Cal goes under, or propose new
ways of funding the transmission line deal.  The California legislature's
inability to identify an immediate solution has cued the media to limit the
publicity of the lesser &plan Bs.8
? At this point, SoCal is interested in a making a deal.  Not only are they
are the on the verge of bankruptcy, but (unlike PG&E) SoCal has also
significantly exposed its parent company to bankruptcy by not taking the
necessary steps to protect its assets.  As reported earlier with PG&E, we are
monitoring all activities surrounding SoCal assets, which could signal
imminent bankruptcy.

The Infamous &Plan B8
Four hours of debate and the absence of Republican representation on Tuesday
night led members of the state Assembly's so-called "Plan B" group to decide
backing only legislation introduced by Assemblymen Dean Florez and Joe
Nation.  A previous proposal by Senate President Pro Tem John Burton that
poised the state to purchase SoCal,s transmission lines for $2.76B to service
debt and left the Ca. PUC to determine SoCal,s unrecovered power costs prior
to bond issuance, didn't,t win support.  As reported earlier, sources
indicate that Davis MOU is likely to suffer a similar fate once introduced by
Senator Polanco later this week.

? The Florez Plan
Florez,s plan is currently under review in the Assembly Energy Committee.
The proposal allows PG&E to issue bonds secured by their assets and use the
revenues to pay creditors.  The state would then assess a tax on the bond
revenues aimed at servicing PG&E,s debt with the CADWR.  Sources report one
drawback to the plan is that PG&E bankruptcy Judge Montali would be required
to authorize any such a transaction respective of other recommendations
available to the court.  This may not be the most time-efficient course of
action.  PG&E had shown signs of approval over similar plans in the months
preceding their bankruptcy.

? The Nation Plan
Nation,s plan allows SoCal. Ed to sell bonds backed by ratepayer revenues
generated from state approved rate hikes.  Additionally, the state would hold
a five-year option on buying the transmissions lines for book value (roughly
$1.2B), as well as holding to the SoCal concessions previously mentioned in
Davis' MOU.  The drawback to Nation,s proposal is that SoCal creditors
(including banks and generators) would have to collectively agree to take
debt repayment at $0.75 on the dollar.  Sources report that some SoCal
creditors favor attempts to recoup dollar for dollar in bankruptcy court over
conceding to a &haircut.8  SoCal. reportedly approves of Nation,s plan
sticking to the principals outlined in Davis, MOU.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread22.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread22.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread22.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack22.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack22.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


thanks.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Amanda Huble                           03/22/2001 04:59 PM

To: Matt Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: web link

It's on the website under the power tab.  The link is already created and
ready to go!

Amanda

Matt Smith
03/22/2001 04:32 PM
To: Amanda Huble/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: web link

i haven't created it yet.  I was hoping to have the link there, so that I can
put the file in the directory tomorrow morning (before you get in).  It will
be called "curtailments.xls".

Mat

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Amanda Huble                           03/22/2001 03:37 PM

To: Matt Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: web link

Where is the file located?

Matt Smith
03/22/2001 02:33 PM
To: Amanda Huble/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: web link

Amanda,

Please add add a link called "Plant Outages (portland)", to the Gas
Fundamentals website under the Power tab.  The description is as follows:

"Query of Portland's database of plant outages for yesterday and today."

Thanks.

Mat


thanks for your help.  How are things going?  Great I hope.
PL


From a credit standpoint, potential risk of this 25,000 bbls/mo, May'01,
financial swap is very small.  But I recognize ECP issues since no support
and no information has ever been available.  Can we include a representation
that, upon execution, would establish eligibility.  I will manage credit
under volume/tenor limits and implied support of a AA parent.  If acceptable,
please send language to Confirmations for use in this (v24545) and all future
trades.

thanks
brant

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shackleton, Sara
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:51 AM
To: Reves, Brant
Subject: Re: ECTRI financial requirements

Yes, "eligible contract participant"  ("ECP") is an issue.  Both ENA and
ECTRI are Delaware corporations and are therefore subject to the jurisdiction
of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the U.S. regulatory agency with
oversight for derivatives).  As a practical matter, I understand that ECTRI
does have many executed ISDA agreements.  I do not know the volume of
"omnibus" trades.  However, the ECTRI omnibus should have ECP representations
in the annex.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate 04/10/2001 10:29 AM 	   To: Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron  cc:   Subject: ECTRI
financial requirements

A financial trade v24545 was done with Total International Limited.  This
entity is subsidiary of a very good credit customer, TotalElf (S&P rated
AA-).  Risk is acceptable, small volumes, short tenor, but from a legal
standpoint, I do not think this entity is an "Eligible Contract Party" as we
have no guaranty support or financial statements to support trading.  I
noticed that quite a bit of financial trades are currently booked in London
with this customer.  Does Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp.
(London financial) have the same ECP requirements as ENA.  If so, I would
like to know how they have established eligibility.

thanks
brant


I have attached the final agenda for the EMF meeting next week.  All times remain the same.  The new agenda lists for each session a few speakers, who will make some comments to help stimulate the group's discussion.   The first session will focus upon key issues that we would like to learn more about.  The second session focuses more on what we have learned about gas supply and infrastructure, while the third session focuses more on gas markets and ties to electricity.
I am looking forward to an interesting and productive meeting.
Hill
*******************************************************************
Hillard G. Huntington                   Voice:  (650) 723-1050
EMF - an international forum on         Fax:    (650) 725-5362
energy and environmental markets        Email:  hillh@stanford.edu
Stanford University
EMF Website: http://www.stanford.edu/group/EMF/
 - Agenda20-1.doc


I will

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:52 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE:

walk me out?  i'll give you a big wet kiss

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:50 PM
To:	Villarreal, Alexandra
Subject:	RE:

I will be leaving probably in about 30-45 minutes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:41 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE:

let me know when you are leaving

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Villarreal, Alexandra
Subject:	RE:

same here

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE:

no, just missin those soft lips and hands of yours

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:38 PM
To:	Villarreal, Alexandra
Subject:	RE:

oh, I was scared that something else was wrong, like serious work problems, or serious family problems, I was just concerned

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE:

what is wrong is that i want my little redhead

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Villarreal, Alexandra
Subject:	RE:

What is wrong?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:33 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE:

everything is not okay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:31 PM
To:	Villarreal, Alexandra
Subject:	RE:

what are you doing?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alexandra
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:31 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:

in case you didnt notice, i am back


I hate Canada.


Those days off are fine.  See if you can get the calendar and put your days
on it.  I know that sounds backwards since you could have done it before, but
this way we can all get into the habit of emailing, getting a response and
then putting it on the calendar.

Sorry for the confusion.

Brenna

Judy Hernandez@ECT
11/21/2000 03:11 PM
To: Brenna Neves/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark D Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: REQUEST FOR TIME OFF.

I  AM REQUESTING FOR THIS TIME OFF,   DEC.20TH , DEC.21ST, &  DEC.22ND.  MY
FAMILY AND I  ARE PLANNING  A TRIP TO HUNTSVILLE.


Forgot to attached the revised agreement.  Here it is.

Stephanie Panus
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.


Number 5 under 'A flawed retail market"  should read "...a power INcentive"
not DISincentive.


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042005.txt


can we do a conference call Wed morning?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Good to hear from you.  Have a good trip up in NYC and I will talk to you
when you get back.  In the next couple of days pull up the Enron ticker and
check out the other deal I have been working on.  We closed it this weekend.
Regards,
Ben


the what do I do

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alex
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	RE:

go to programs, system utility apps, and then msn messenger.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Villarreal, Alex
Subject:	RE:

how

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Villarreal, Alex
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:

turn on your instant messenger


Susan:
    Please keep me posted on the appeal process.  The California Cast
Metals Association encompasses over 80% of the casting tonnage poured in
California and is a heavy consumer of electricity.  We're definitely
interested in any work being done of DA.

Thanks,
James

"Dasovich, Jeff" wrote:

>  Greetings:The Commission denied it.  Work is underway to appeal the
> Commission's decision to the courts.  Sue Mara is taking the lead on
> this for us.  She can update you on where the appeal stands.  Be great
> to get you support for/participation in the appeal.Best,Jeff
>
>      -----Original Message-----
>      From: California Cast Metals Assoc.
>      [mailto:ccma@foundryccma.org]
>      Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:27 PM
>      To: Dasovich, Jeff
>      Subject: Re: FW: Direct Access Application for Rehearing
>
>      Jeff:
>          What was the final status of the rehearing application
>      CCMA signed?
>      thanks, James
>
>      "Dasovich, Jeff" wrote:
>
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Mara, Susan
>     > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:09 PM
>     > To: Dasovich, Jeff
>     > Subject: FW: Direct Access Application for Rehearing
>     > Importance: High
>     > Please forward this to those who agreed to sign on
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com]
>     > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:06 PM
>     > To: ARM; 'Fairchild, Tracy'; Norm Plotkin; Gary Ackerman;
>     > Vicki Sandler; Anderson, Robert; Merilyn Ferrara; Herb
>     > Zinn; John Yurkanin; Max Bulk; Steve Huhman
>     > Cc: Lon W. House; Scott Blaising
>     > Subject: Direct Access Application for Rehearing
>     > Importance: High
>     > Attached for your review and comment is a third draft of
>     > the application for rehearing.  The main changes are (1)
>     > the addition of several morep arties (and will those who
>     > arranged for these parties to sign on PLEASE forward a
>     > copy of this draft to your contacts so that they get to
>     > see it and know how to contact me with any comments or
>     > suggestions); and (2) a legislative historys ection which
>     > summarizes the various pertinent bills and resolutions.
>     > Please reply with any comments or suggested changes as
>     > soon as possible.  Thanks! Dan Law Offices of Daniel W.
>     > Douglass
>     > 5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
>     > Woodland Hills, CA 91367
>     > Tel:   (818) 596-2201
>     > Fax:  (818) 346-6502
>     > douglass@energyattorney.com
>     >
>     >
>     > *********************************************************************
>     >
>     > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
>     > relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and
>     > privileged material for the sole use of the intended
>     > recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
>     > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
>     > intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the
>     > recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron
>     > Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
>     > delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
>     > attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an
>     > acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
>     > enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>     > affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
>     > and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a
>     > contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
>     >
>     > *********************************************************************
>


-----Original Message-----
From: Carol Covington
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 3:35 PM
To: David Heineke; Jim Wallis; Ricky Stewart
Subject: FW: Stalin quote

-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Wright [SMTP:julie@rpcga.com] <mailto:[SMTP:julie@rpcga.com]>
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 3:30 PM
To: Jim Love; Patsy Henry; Candy Grant; Carol Covington; Faye Click
Subject: Stalin quote

 > "Those who cast the votes decide nothing.
 >  Those who count the votes decide everything."
 >
 >             -Josef Stalin
 >


Attached please find the agenda for the November 29, 2000 BAWG
meeting.

Wes Yeomans

     (See attached file: bawgagenda1100.doc)

 - bawgagenda1100.doc


Dr. Kaminski:

Thanks very much for taking the time to talk with me about my
electricity model when you visited Carnegie Mellon. (I was the PhD
student in Finance who had a two-factor model for pricing
electricity. My model incorporated strategic behaviour and varying
price elasticities across different consumers of electricity). While here,
you mentioned the possibility of further developing my model at Enron.
One avenue you suggested was through the summer internship program at
Enron. If this is still an option, I would very much like to talk with you
or one of your associates about working with or at Enron on my model.

I can be reached by phone at (412) 683-9085.

Sincerely,

 Aziz A. Lookman
Graduate School of Industrial Administration
5000 Forbes Avenue
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Tel: 412-268-3681
Fax: 412-268-6837
(pls. mark the fax c/o Jackie Cavendish)


Kay, here's the near to last draft of the  form. Sorry of the delay and
thanks for being a sport about it, especially when your dvelope rtypes are
needig to get on down the road.. Please feel free to work on this, but
please  don't distribute this as our form, as you can see from the note
below that we still have a way to go before it is  the "form',but remaining
work is limited to speific content here and there, typos ,and some
litigation sturff. The structure will remain, so you can safely work into
this the West LB stuff.

John R. asked that  you and he have a chat about the directionyou are
headedand hwo to coordinate the changes that need to be made - in terms of
substance as awell as drafting - to get to an standard set of changes for
the off balance sheet work. I would be glad to participate.

---------------------- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
on 09/21/2000 06:23 PM ---------------------------

John Schwartzenburg
09/21/2000 01:57 PM

To:   Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Bishop/NA/Enron@Enron, John G
      Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Roberto
      Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, David K
      Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
      Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angie
      Chappell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:  Form Contract, Rev Minus 1

Here's the next to last iteration of the form contract before we christen
it officially "FORM 2000 - Rev. 00",clean and compared. John R will need to
take this, diddle with it,  and use the product PDQ for a couple of crisis
applications, but before it becomed and gets advertized as "Form 2000" I
woanted to collect  last comments from you guys and get some fine tuning
from  our litigation mangers  onthe arbitration and dispute resoluton
materials, which is to be on my desk by the end of the day.
Because of Johnnie's urgencies, I did not have the chance to pretty up
format and section and page numbers, please forgive. We will get it next
time.

You guys also have the un-revised draft exhibits. I think Rigby was to
revise to try and revise them to fit  the form - I await the draft exhibits
withbaited breath.

Please collect your thoughts and we we schedule a time to get tehm in.

Angie, please print both attachemenst and this e-mail for me.

(See attached file: ENRON EPC-0921-rev0-1.doc)

 - ENRON EPC-0921-rev0-1.doc