It appears that this deal, once complete will be approximately $80k
positive.  The value of litigating is primarily in maintaining discipline in
the industry regarding the enforcability of financial contracts (as opposed
to physical contracts were the current norm is for a buyer to walk from his
contracts whenever he perceives the availability of a better alternative).

Andrew/Britt - can you please provide an estimate of what sending this
message will ultimately cost in legal fees?

Thanks,
Alan

	From:  Douglas S Friedman                           02/23/2001 04:16 AM

To: Alan Engberg
cc:
Subject: Salerno

How does this deal look now in light of the surprising recent price increases
in PE?  Are the projected cash flows worth pursuing at this time?

Doug
---------------------- Forwarded by Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001
04:07 AM ---------------------------
From: Andrew Edison@ENRON on 02/23/2001 03:08 AM
To: Alan Engberg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas S Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Britt Davis/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Salerno

I just wanted to provide you with a quick update on this matter.  We sent a
demand letter to Salerno about a month ago, but have heard nothing. I have
made several calls to Salerno's Bob Lampo, but he will not return my calls.
Therefore, we are preparing a lawsuit, which we will file here in Houston.  I
have asked Britt Davis in the Enron Litigation Unit to prepare the lawsuit.
Alan, I have told Britt to give you a call if he has any questions.

Truth and justice will prevail.

Andy


Attached is the report for the week ended December 1, 2000.   Due to
technical difficulties, the report is back in the old style word document
format.    Jan will add this document to the website archive when she returns
to the office next week.

Here is GISB Order 587-M.

Here are EPMI's Comments to the GridFlorida RTO Filing.


The trade confirmation for your order(s) is now available online at etrade.com(sm).
Use the URL(s) below to view (customer log on required).

The information contained in this confirmation shall be binding upon you if you do not object,
either in writing or via electronic mail, within two (2) days after the confirmation is first received by you.

E*TRADE's new radio show E*TRADE On Air! is an informative and slightly irreverent view of the financial
world broadcast live at 9:00 a.m. ET weekdays.  To access this and other streaming audio or video programs
--including WebFN--click Media Center on the etrade.com Home page.

Need to make a deposit?  Do it online with E*TRADE's Cash Transfer Service.  Sign up now or use your existing
link at http://cashtransfer.etrade.com and you can order a transfer of funds from your checking account into
your E*TRADE brokerage account today, or any time of the day or night.  No writing checks, no stamps, and no
snail mail!

Document ID: 20011108031843576620086085
https://trading.etrade.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/applogic+accttaxbridge?page=CONFIRM&cmd=display&doctype=cnf&document_id=20011108031843576620086085


I sent the e-mail below to our lawyers in ENA Legal.

 In order to provide better oversight and control of ENA legal expenditures
on large transactions, please continue to follow the procedures set forth
below for transactions where outside legal fees and expenses are expected to
exceed $25,000.00.  The purpose of these procedures is to (i) improve
communication with counsel (inside and outside) on issues, fees and services
and (ii) send price signals on legal costs (with respect to specific
transactions) on a timely basis to the business units.  Every effort should
be made to continue to provide high quality legal work that has become
standard at ENA.

 1.  A written estimate of proposed fees and expenses and a written
description of the services shall be provided by our outside counsel.  The
responsible business unit and the General Counsel shall review and approve
such written estimate before our outside counsel is directed to provide
substantial professional services.

 2.  Our outside counsel shall be instructed to promptly submit a revised
written estimate if such outside counsel determines that legal fees and
expenses for such transaction will exceed the previous written estimate by
$25,000.00.  Such revised written estimate shall be reviewed and approved by
the responsible business unit and the General Counsel or his/her designee
before our outside counsel is directed to provide substantial additional
professional services.

 3.  In order to accurately track such expenses so that the expenses can be
properly allocated to the various business units, a work order number should
be obtained for each transaction.

 Thank you for your cooperation.  If you have any questions or any other
suggestions for controlling expenses, please call me at extension 36544.


man, do i OWE you a phone call.  please don't hold it against me. sort of
well, you know, a little nuts right now.  but i will reconnect.  i promise.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 02:44 PM -----

	Mona L Petrochko
	11/30/2000 01:07 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, jbennett@gmssr.com
		 cc: Paul Kaufman
		 Subject: SCE SOx Auction

SCE is awaiting a commission order to auction off its SO2 credits.  Janel
Guerrero is very interested in this.  Please let her know once a final order
is issued.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000
01:05 PM ---------------------------

Janel Guerrero
11/07/2000 04:33 PM
To: Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

Thanks for the voice mail/update on SoCal Ed. It makes sense that everything
is moving slowly behind the power issues.  Talk with you soon!


This request has been pending approval for  5 days and you are the
alternate.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000003991&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000003991
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 10/3/00 12:31:22 PM
Requested For       : stephen.bennett@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


One of my GARP connections at El Paso has put forth a white paper for
discussion. He is hoping it will be adopted across the industry.  He will be
presenting it June 5th, at the next GARP meeting in Houston, to be hosted by
El Paso at El Paso.  He is collecting feedback before the upcoming meeting.
Please review, and comment to either myself of Lloyd at the address below.

Thanks,
Frank

His email address is:
Lloyd.Bloom@ElPaso.com


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 11:39 AM -----

	Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/21/2001 11:33 AM

		 To: Kelly Lombardi/ENRON@enronXgate, Samuel Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Bernice
Rodriguez/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Venturatos/ENRON@enronXgate, Samuel
Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole
Hunter/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Angela Y
Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen
Lambert/ENRON@enronXgate, Fraisy George/ENRON@enronXgate, Tandra
Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate, Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: ClickPaper Approvals, 05-21-01

Please see attached.

Aparna Rajaram
Ph: (713) 345-4563
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Aparna.Rajaram@enron.com


Hope your move into the new apartment went well.  I'm sure you are going  to
have so much fun living there, especially since you really will have a
roommate now.

Thought I'd give you a little bit of an update regarding Ted...

So I didn't get back to the office until Wednesday last week because I was in
Austin Tuesday for that recruiting trip.  When I got in I of course
immediately checked my email...nothing.  I also didn't have any messages at
any of the 3 phones I can be reached through.  Come Thursday afternoon, still
no interaction...I am pissed.  About 2:00 p.m. he calls.  He asks me about
San Diego and I ask him about Austin...both trips were great.  We discuss
UCLA and UT football for  a while...I of course get riled up.  He informs me
that he is going to be trading corn (yes, you heard me corn) for Enron.
While he is very excited about trading I get the impression he feels a little
overwhelmed and he is a very concerned about how much trading will limit his
vacation time.  He said that he and Darren (the guy he works with) had been
meeting with consultants all week to get up to speed and therefore the week
had pretty much just been one long meeting.  It is around this time that he
brings up the vacation thing and how, to his dismay, as a trader you work
when the markets are open and you're only off when they're closed.  As a
result, he's decided to get in his long visit home ASAP, i.e. "I'm leaving
tomorrow (Friday) to go to California for a week."  I make sure I heard him
correctly and yes he said leaving, tomorrow and  1 whole week (7 days) AND at
no point does he ask to get together before he leaves.  So, that was
Thursday.  I'm down on his floor again on Friday to talk to my old group and,
to my dismay, run in to him.  We exchange pleasantries, I ask him when he's
leaving (5:00 p.m.), he informs me he is going to sleep for the entire week
in an attempt to catch-up, I tell him to have fun and that's that.

Anyway, I was not able to get him out for a drink to find out what's going on
and now I just have to wait.  Any thoughts?

Talk to you soon,
Susan

******** Humor is the best medicine.********

So I'm thinking of taking that T-shirt Ted gave me and writing this on the
back of it...

I dated Ted Noble and all I have to show for it is this lousy t-shirt.

Dont'cha love it?


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 06:12 PM -----

	Tracy Ngo
	03/14/2001 04:26 PM

		 To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
mark.taylor@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Merrill Lynch assignment to Allegheny

I'm waiting on Merrill to verify the transactions.  I will advise.  Thanks.
I'm already working with Joe Hunter in financial confirms and Rhonda Denton
re. the physical power transactions.

Thanks,
Tracy

Janice R Moore
03/14/2001 02:31 PM
To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: William  S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
mark.taylor@enron.com

Subject: Merrill Lynch assignment to Allegheny

Tracy
Just wanted to let you know that I"ll be working on the physical power side
and Sara Shackleton will be working on the ISDA side of this deal, so when
you get the info ready, you can send it to us directly.  Thanks.
Regards,
Janice

EB3811
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-3490)


This is the David's answer:

The only one that I can think of that may be of use is the "CES Volume
Comparison" report ... that is the one that ya'll had for January that showed
all of the purchases and sales, by pipeline.  It is available for any month.
The reports that I regularly used were for helping to clean up current month
activity, which would not be of any use to you.

David
---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 01/11/2000
11:05 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ami Chokshi                           01/11/2000 09:02 AM

To: dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Request for Application Report List

Hey David,

Could you help me determine the GMS reports that I may need. Thanks for your
help.

Ami

---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 01/11/2000
09:01 AM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer@ECT
01/06/2000 03:58 PM
To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Request for Application Report List

---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000
03:57 PM ---------------------------

Robert Superty
01/06/2000 08:32 AM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L
Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat
Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Request for Application Report List

This is a follow up to the earlier email I forwarded regarding CES historical
information. Note the deadline of 1/15, I believe that should be Friday 1/14
so I need your responses by Thursday 1/13.

Please fill out the spreadsheet for each area and forward back to me. I will
consolidate our responses from a Logistics perspective. Lets have them add
everything they need and if challenged we can re-review later.

Thanks - Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Bryce Baxter                           01/05/2000 12:00 PM

To: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Inja Chun/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tommy J
Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lawrence R
Daze/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Chambers/Corp/Enron@Enron, jpeeple@columbienergy.com
Subject: Re: Request for Application Report List

Last month Richard Burchfield sent us the following list of reports that are
available from CES's systems.  IT is working on a way to secure an electronic
copy of the required reports and making them available to us online via the
electronic document management system.  While ENA is not liable for pre-2000
business, we may need to assist with research as issues arise.  In order to
get the ball rolling, we need to get a list together of the reports we need.
Please fill out the attached spreadsheet and list any reports that you need
and return it to me by Friday, 1/15/2000.  If you do not want any reports,
please send me an Email letting me know that.  I have included samples of how
to fill this out, and if you have any questions please give me a call.

If you aren't sure which reports you need based on the names, please get with
any CES employees you have hired or with a CES transition employee to get
clarification.  If you need samples of any of these reports please let my
assistant, Pam Chambers, know and she will coordinate getting a sample report
printed for you.

In addition, I will need a list of the users and their logonid's who will
need to have access to this data.  Please send that to me by the 15th as
well.

Thanks, Bryce

Richard Burchfield
12/01/99 04:58 PM
To: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Request for Application Report List

All,
 Below is attached the report list for CES.

Richard
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT on 12/01/99
03:48 PM ---------------------------

cdeaton@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/01/99 01:25:37 PM
To: Richard Burchfield/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "        -         *Peeples, Jeff" <jpeeple@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
"        -         *Licarione, Linda" <llicari@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Re: Request for Application Report List

Please see the attached for the Altra GMS report listing.  Please forward any
additional questions relating to Altra GMS to Linda Licarione (713-693-2845)
or
Jeff Peeples (713-693-2597).  Thanks.

Linda Licarione
12/01/99 01:04 PM

To: Clay Deaton/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Request for Application Report List

Attached is a list of 210 reports from Altra GMS.  Please note that we may not
be using all of these reports.  If you need me to scale this down to those
currently being used, I will need to do a bit of analysis.  Many of the base
reports, those denoted in the spreadsheet with filename-location (1st column)
=
master.mdb are not currently being used at CES.  Let me know if you have any
questions.

---------------------- Forwarded by Linda Licarione/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/01/99
12:58 PM ---------------------------

Clay Deaton
11/30/99 01:27 PM

To: Linda Licarione/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Request for Application Report List

Can you provide me with a complete list of GMS reports?

---------------------- Forwarded by Clay Deaton/CES/ColumbiaGas on 11/30/99
01:26 PM ---------------------------

rburchf@ect.enron.com on 11/30/99 10:36:11 AM
Please respond to rburchf@ect.enron.com

To: Clay Deaton/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: csulliv@ect.enron.com, bprice@ect.enron.com
Subject: Request for Application Report List

Clay,
     I have had several requests from the ENA business groups. now that the
agreement has been finalized, for report lists from your key applications,
those
being, Altra GMS and Risk Works( there may be others as people become more
aware). There will be a need for information for ENA to manage contracts as we
go through he transition period. We feel this would be an easier process to
work
through if ENA knows what kind of information they can request as we go
through
the transition.

Thanks, Richard

 - GMS_ReportListing by Header.xls


Marvin -- We look forward to your visit.

Agenda for Meeting at Enron

Monday, June 11

12:15:  FERC Team arrives at Enron
  1400 Smith Street
  Come to the Front Desk -- Sarah Novosel (Senior Director, Federal
Regulatory Affairs)
  and Christi Nicolay (Senior Director, Power Trading, Federal Regulatory
Affairs)
  will be waiting to meet you and sign you in with security

12:30-1:30 Lunch with Christi Nicolay, Sarah Novosel, Jim Steffes (Vice
President, Government Affairs)

1:30 - 2:30 Presentation by Dave Forster, Vice President, EnronOnline

2:30 - 3:00 Tour of Power Trading Floor with meeting and demonstration of
trading activities with
  Kevin Presto, Vice President

3:00 - 3:30 Tour of Gas Trading Floor with meeting and demonstration of
trading activities
  with Phillip Allen, Managing Director,  West Gas Trading

3:30 - 4:00 Wrap Up


request_number:  DS-GE:001-003
firstname:  Darcy
lastname:  Norville
e-mail:  darcy@tonkon.com
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JCG-01 and -02
page_numbers:  not specified
request_text:  Request DS-GE:001

Please disclose and/or produce copies of any and all communications, from
October 16, 2001 to the present, between any BPA representative and any
representative of any other party, concerning any of the following subjects:

a. The general structure of the Cost Recovery Adjustment Clauses (CRACs)
described in the testimony of the Joint Customers;

b. Any differences between the form of the CRACs described in the testimony
of the Joint Customers and the CRACs contained in BPA,s Amended Proposal, or
those contained in BPA,s Supplemental Proposal;

c. The detailed mechanics of implementing the CRACs described in the
testimony of the Joint Customers;

d. Revenue effects of the CRACs described in the testimony of the Joint
Customers, any modifications; or

e. Any aspect of the Partial Stipulation and Settlement Agreement and the
Parties, Proposal attached thereto.

For purposes of this Request, &disclose and/or produce8 has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, &disclose and/or
produce8 means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not &disclose and/or produce8 oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, &disclose
and/or produce8 means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully &disclose and/or produce8 any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

Request No.: DS-GE:002

Request: Exhibit: Direct Testimony of the Joint Customer Group

Please disclose and/or produce any and all communications from October 16,
2001 to the present, between the BPA representatives listed below and any
representative of any other party concerning BPA,s rates to be in effect for
Fiscal Years 2002-2006, the interactions of such rates and customer
contracts, or procedural aspects of these rate proceedings.

Bob Proctor
Tim McCoy
Byrne Lovell
Byron Keep
Valerie Lefler
Jon Wright
Peter Berger

For purposes of this Request, &disclose and/or produce8 has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, &disclose and/or
produce8 means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not &disclose and/or produce8 oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, &disclose
and/or produce8 means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully &disclose and/or produce8 any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

Request No.: DS-GE:003

Request: Exhibit: Direct Testimony of the Joint Customer Group

Please disclose and/or produce any and all communications from October 16,
2001 to the present, between any of the party representatives listed below
and any representative of BPA concerning rates to be in effect for BPA,s
Fiscal Years 2002-2006, the interactions of such rates and customer
contracts, or procedural aspects of rate these proceedings.

Terry Mundorf (WPAG)
Lon Peters (PGP)
Linc Wolverton (ICNU)
Scott Brattebo (PacifiCorp)
Kevin Clark (Seattle City Light)
David Hoff (PSE)
Geoff Carr (Northwest Requirements Utilities)
Dennis Parrish  (Market Access Coalition Group)
Pam Jacklin (PacifiCorp)
Peter Richardson (PPC)
Kyle Sciuchetti (PPC)
Ray Kindley (PGP)
Jay Waldron (PGP)
Doug Brawley (PNGC)
Eric Johnson (PNGC)
Darcy Norville (PGE)
Lynn Williams (PGE)
Steve Weiss (Northwest Energy Coalition)
Mark Hellman (OPUC)

For purposes of this Request, &disclose and/or produce8 has the meanings
described below.  With respect to oral communications, &disclose and/or
produce8 means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel).  For purposes of this
Request, you need not &disclose and/or produce8 oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

With respect to written communications, the Request includes communications
in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including, without
limitation, e-mails), or whatever form.  For such communications, &disclose
and/or produce8 means to provide copies of all non-identical versions of any
written communications and to describe with particularity the location where
such communications were found and/or stored, including the identity of the
individual with possession or control of the written communications; to
describe with particularity the circumstances under which they were generated
or referred to; and to fully &disclose and/or produce8 any oral
communications made in connection with the written communications consistent
with the preceding paragraph.  For purposes of this Request, you need not
produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part of the
official file in the rate case.

response_text:  Response DS-GE:001

Portland General Electric (PGE) objects to this Data Request on the grounds
that it (i) seeks information that is not relevant; (ii) seeks information
that is privileged; and (iii) seeks information that is unduly burdensome to
produce.  Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section 1010.8(b).  PGE
further objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it is in improper
form as it does not cite to specific testimony or indicate the specific use
to which the information sought will be put.  Special Rules of Practice,
WP-02-01.  Further, the Data Request PGE received in hard copy of March 9,
2001 covered communications from October 16, 2001 to the present, of which
there were none.  PGE hereby responds to the corrected Data Requests received
March 14, 2001 covering communications from October 16, 2000 to the present.
Without waiving the foregoing objections, PGE responds as follows:

 I reviewed my email archive (which is automatically emptied after two
weeks), correspondence file and meeting notes and asked Lyn Williams to do
the same.  I also questioned Ms. Williams about her recollections of any
communications described in this Data Request.  Based on these inquiries and
recollections, PGE reports the following communications:

1. On or about January 22, 2001, following a noticed settlement meeting, Pam
Jacklin, Terry Mundorf and another party representative (I do not recall who)
met with Alan Burns and Peter Burger in one of their offices to discuss
whether BPA intended to file a supplemental proposal in this case.

2. During a Joint Customer Group testimony drafting session during the week
of March 5, 2001 Lon Peters placed a telephone call to Bob Procter seeking
clarification of BPA's intent with respect to treatment of transmission
losses in the LB CRAC GRSPs.

3. Lyn Williams and/or Darcy Norville received the emails described below,
copies of which are attached (emails that were sent or copied to the Service
List are not included below or attached):

a. From Dave Piper to Lyn Williams et al., dated 1/26/01,
Subject: Re: Urgent: Potential Substantial Rate Increase;
b. From Kyle Sciuchetti to A. W. Turner et al., dated 2/16/01, Subject:
Settlement Signers.

4. On October 16, 2000 representatives of six Northwest Investor-owned
Utilities sent a letter with comments on BPA's Proposed Amended FY 2002-2006
Power Rate Case to Syd Berwager, a copy of which is attached.

5. On October 16, 2000 representatives of five Northwest Investor-owned
Utilities sent a letter with supplemental comments on the appropriate scope
of the reopened WP-02 proceeding to Syd Berwager, a copy of which is attached.

Response DS-GE:002

Portland General Electric (PGE) objects to this Data Request on the grounds
that it (i) seeks information that is not relevant; (ii) seeks information
that is privileged; and (iii) seeks information that is unduly burdensome to
produce.  Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section 1010.8(b).  PGE
further objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it is in improper
form as it does not cite to specific testimony or indicate the specific use
to which the information sought will be put.  Special Rules of Practice,
WP-02-01.  Further, the Data Request PGE received in hard copy of March 9,
2001 covered communications from October 16, 2001 to the present, of which
there were none.  PGE hereby responds to the corrected Data Requests received
March 14, 2001 covering communications from October 16, 2000 to the present.
Without waiving the foregoing objections, PGE responds as follows:

I am aware of no communications responsive to this Data Request other than
those disclosed in response to DS-GE:001.

Response DS-GE:003:

Portland General Electric (PGE) objects to this Data Request on the grounds
that it (i) seeks information that is not relevant; (ii) seeks information
that is privileged; and (iii) seeks information that is unduly burdensome to
produce.  Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section 1010.8(b).  PGE
further objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it is in improper
form as it does not cite to specific testimony or indicate the specific use
to which the information sought will be put.  Special Rules of Practice,
WP-02-01.  Further, the Data Request PGE received in hard copy of March 9,
2001 covered communications from October 16, 2001 to the present, of which
there were none.  PGE hereby responds to the corrected Data Requests received
March 14, 2001 covering communications from October 16, 2000 to the present.
Without waiving the foregoing objections, PGE responds as follows:

I am aware of no communications responsive to this Data Request other than
those disclosed in response to DS-GE:001.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  206.29.168.129
3.  Remote IP Address:  206.29.168.129
4.  Form URL:
http://www.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT; DigExt)


Jim, I really don't see a need for this meeting - you can count on us not
dropping the ball.  I have a good understanding of the retail product
offering, in fact, we lead the outsourcing sales process for the large
industrial customers in NA until EES bought back their minority
shareholders.  I have a very good relationship with Dan Leff and Sunde.  I
already have Dan's committment to help service the execution of the business
initially.  As it grows and the product proves itself out we can staff.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------

James M Bannantine@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/30/2000 10:33 AM
To: Lou L Pai@EES, Mark Frevert@Enron, David W Delainey@ECT, Dan Leff@EES,
Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey@ECT, Don Black/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Retail in South America

My assistant will be putting together a meeting/conference call for next
WEdnesday on how to move forward with retail in South America given the plan
to have retail report through the wholesale group in South America for 2001.
Key points for discussion will be:

-brief overview of the state of the retail business in South America
-brief overview of the current retail organization and how it would report
through wholesale
-discussion of how we  move from where we are currently (good value
proposition, customer's signed up, organization to implement)  to make the
retail business a success:
 -by having an interface with EES for best practices, systems, etc.,
 -under wholesale budget and organization for simplicity and cost sake

Wednesday is Mark's first day back in the office from Europe, Dan will be in
Europe, Orlando will be in Brazil, others I believe in Houston, so we will
try to accomodate everyone's schedules or at least get a quorum of those
involved present on the call/meeting.


Dear Market Participants:

On August 18th, we sent out the attached email asking all Participants for
their
assistance in executing an Indemnity Agreement, which was a new document
associated with the recently completed Credit Redesign Project. We have since
taken feedback received from Participants and made some clarifying revisions
to
the Indemnity Agreement.  Revisions were made in the following sections:

INDEMNITY SECTION
     Paragraph 1,3

GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION
     Paragraph 7 (b)

Attached is the REVISED Indemnity Agreement which covers all CalPX-provided
pool
performance bonds.  Additionally, we have attached a copy of the Core and CTS
Market Pool Performance Bonds.   We thank you in advance for your timely
handling of these materials, and we respectfully request that you complete the
enclosed by September 15, 2000.

If you have any questions or require further assistance, please contact Clark
Cheng at (626) 537-3243.

(See attached file: AIGINDEMNITYAGREEMENT_REV.doc)
IMPORTANT NOTE:  Please print Indemnity Agreement attachment on legal size
paper.

(See attached file: CPXFINALCOREMARKETBOND.doc)
(See attached file: CPXFINALCTSMARKETBOND.doc)

(Embedded image moved to file: pic04269.pcx)

August 18, 2000

Dear Market Participants:

The California Power Exchange has just completed a comprehensive credit
redesign.  Our new credit policies now incorporate new credit methodologies
similar to those used at major commodity exchanges. Specifically, CalPX now
recognizes more aspects of the actual market volatility and individual
portfolio
risk in order to provide quantifiable management information on the collateral
accounts of participants while maintaining the integrity of our markets.  We
have also combined financial requirements for our CORE (Day-Ahead, Day-Of and
Real Time) and CTS (Forwards) markets.  The incorporation of a $20 million
default bond in our CORE market and a liquidity line up to $50 million in our
CTS market provide insurance protection in the event of a default and allow
timely management of cash flow in the markets.

Enclosed for your review are all the necessary documents pertaining to our
credit redesign, including a brief instruction sheet to assist you with the
completion of these documents.  We thank you in advance for your timely
handling
of these materials, and we respectfully request that you complete the enclosed
by August 31, 2000.

If you have any questions or require further assistance, please contact Clark
Cheng at (626) 537-3243.

 - AIGINDEMNITYAGREEMENT_REV.doc
 - CPXFINALCOREMARKETBOND.doc
 - CPXFINALCTSMARKETBOND.doc
 - pic04269.pcx


Please print all attachments for me.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000 04:24 PM
---------------------------

Anthony Key
08/29/2000 03:28 AM
To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Naomi Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: due dilligence checklist for acquisitions

As requested by Shona, attached is a blank SOAP form, a completed SOAP form
for your review and a simple presentation on how the SOAP process operates.
Hope you find it useful. Please come back to me if you need any more info.

Anthony

---------------------- Forwarded by Anthony Key/LON/ECT on 29/08/2000 09:29
---------------------------

Naomi Connell
29/08/2000 08:55
To: Anthony Key/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: due dilligence checklist for acquisitions

Could you get this out to the people below - thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Naomi Connell/LON/ECT on 29/08/2000 08:50
---------------------------

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           28/08/2000 14:44

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Naomi Connell/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: due dilligence checklist for acquisitions

I'm in the process of putting together some slides for the presentation on
the 7th.  In doing this, I was reviewing the global operations presentation
and  noted on the global operations initiative slide one of the initiatives
listed is "creation of due diligence checklist for acquisitions." I know
Naomi Connell has put together the SOAP which her group in London uses for
this purpose which might be useful.

Naomi - could you send the three of us a copy of this document?

Thanks

Shona


1400 Smith.

Morning would probably be better for me.

Kay

"Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com> on 05/08/2001 09:42:44 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Visit to Houston

Looks like I will be in Houston tomorrow ( Wed.) and would like to come by to
meet you and to discuss the Clarksdale contract. I'm tied up in the middle of
the day, but will probably have time early (9 or 10 am) or in the afternoon.

Please let me know your availability and we'll set something up. I assume
you're on Smith St. downtown.


marketrelations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

This is being posted at PSEG's request, inasmuch as they are having problems
accessing the TIE List Server this morning.

----- Forwarded by XXXXX on 11/27/00 09:11 AM -----
"XXXXX, XXXXX." <XXXXXX.XXXX@pseg.com>
11/27/00 08:28 AM

To: XXXX XXXXX/NYISO@NYISO
cc:
Subject: Price Corrections for the 16 November 2000 Day-Ahead Market

PSEG shares the concerns that have been raised on this tie list concerning
the price correction to the November 16 DAM market.  In addition to clearly
explaining exactly what happened, we request the ISO address the following
issues at the November 30 BIC meeting:

1.  How, if this was an error, did it get so far into the SCUC process -
especially given the impact it had on system prices?
2.  Explaining exactly what authority the ISO is acting under in eliminating
the "problem" bid.
3.  Defining the time frame of all actions taken involving this transaction
(i.e., will you provide participants with a time-line from beginning to end
with these transactions)
4.  Outlining the security issues that will be taken to insure the data
integrity and time stamps associated with all levels of this transaction,
including MIS data and correspondence between the participant and the ISO.
5.  Assuring the market participants that the financial implications and
credit restrictions on the bidding entity were NOT the driving force behind
changing prices (the impact of this could bankrupt certain market
participants - we want to know that this is not a concern the ISO is
addressing).
6.  In Jim's notification he states:  "The NYISO experienced software
anomalies with respect to the submission of these transactions that may have
contributed to the difficulties experienced in confirming the initial bids."
The word "may" in this statement infers there may be a doubt that there was
a direct connection between the software problem and the bids.   Will you be
committing in this meeting to exactly what caused the problem?

Ray


Laurel has informed me that anytime you have problems with enpower to call
her.  She has the tools at her house to accomplish the necessary task.

Work  34873
steno 635
pager 713-761-5792
cell 281-381-7430
home 281-286-2076

Theresa
pager 800-718-1341

Thanks
Kayne


We won't need the GD curves, we can use GDP for all... O

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Tuesday, January  8, 2002 2:12 PM
To:	Winfree, O'Neal D.
Subject:	GD curves

Will you still need the GD curves, GD-HPL/SHPCH and GD-WAHA, or can the GDP be used instead?

KK


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 09:36 AM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	03/20/2001 10:15 PM

		 To: Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'"
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>,
"'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante
(E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'"
<DKK@eslawfirm.com>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan
Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'" <smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John
Larrea (E-mail)'" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Kristin Vellandi
(E-mail)'" <kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>,
"'McNally Ray (E-mail)'" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen'
(E-mail)'" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Roger Pelote
(E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell (E-mail)'"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Theo Pahos (E-mail)'" <tpahos@ppallc.com>, "'Tom Ross
(E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Carol H Hudson (E-mail)"
<Chudson@iepa.com>, steven kelly <steven@iepa.com>, "'Anne Kelly (E-mail)'"
<kelly@hnks.com>, "'Chuck Cole (E-mail)'" <ccole@advocation-inc.com>,
"'Delany Hunter (E-mail)'" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "'DJ Smith
(E-mail)'" <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "'Hedy Govenar (E-mail)'"
<hgovenar@acom2.com>, <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Maureen OHaren
(E-mail)'" <Oharen@hmot.com>, "'Mike Monagan (E-mail)'" <mrmonagan@aol.com>,
"'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'" <isenberg@hmot.com>, "'Robert Ross (E-mail)'"
<robbiz@cwo.com>, "'Ron Tom (E-mail)'" <Rtom@govadv.com>, "'Scott Govenar
(E-mail)'" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "'Susan Mccabe (E-mail)'"
<sfmccabe@mindspring.com>, <rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<lchurch@epsa.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: IEP Press Teleconference Wednesday 3/21 @ 11:30 PST

IEP will brief members of the media on California?s rapidly changing electric
market during a tele-conference  March 21 at 11:30 am PST.  Please feel free
to listen in...

Call In #:    1-800-374-2393
Conference I.D: Independent Energy Producers (IEP)

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)


Steve,

Jim Steffes called me to inquire as to the information you are interested in, regarding the California refund case, and I passed the following along to him by phone:

Status of the refund claim:

The CAISO refund claims made in CAISO letters to Congress, and the final claim at the FERC-ordered settlement conference, were approximately $38 MM.  The initial claim in the California Refund case before Judge Birchman was very similar, although the most recent CAISO claim is that they owe us $1MM!  A review of their claim revealed errors.  I asked Charles River Associates to re-run the numbers correcting only the errors and they came up with a $57MM figure.  Please note that this number resulted from an internal exercise and is not a claim by the ISO.  However, I consider this the maximum exposure from what is known at this time.  I expect that CAISO will revise its claim against us around December 7, and I will communicate the new claim as soon as I receive it.

Points summarizing the proceeding:

The California refund proceeding at FERC, unlike the Pacific Northwest proceeding, contemplates that refunds will be paid and orders the Judge to determine the amount of the refunds.
Issues to be decided by the Judge include (1) the amounts of the mitigated market claiming price (2) the amounts owed by each seller and (3) the amount that a seller may offset against its refund obligation.
This proceeding has been delayed due to errors and omissions in the California ISO's data.
Due to deficiencies in the data, it is also difficult to assess potential exposure. The California ISO's claims have thus far been erroneous.
Hearings are scheduled to occur on December 17-21 and February 11-15. The Judge's ruling is expected on March 8, 2002.

Timing of the FERC Order:
It is difficult to say how quickly the Commission may rule after receiving the Judge's certification of findings and record on March 8.  Arguably, they could act very quickly due to the limited scope of the proceeding and the fact that the Judge's findings will likely be limited to the three issues described above.

Let me know if you need any more information.  I will copy you on significant memos in the case.  Regards,  Ray


-----Original Message-----
From: 	christopher.lewis@accenture.com@ENRON <mailto:christopher.lewis@accenture.com@ENRON> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-christopher+2Elewis+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-christopher+2Elewis+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	carmbrus@yahoo.com <mailto:carmbrus@yahoo.com>; sbeltran@deloitte.com <mailto:sbeltran@deloitte.com>; sanay.v.bhirud@accenture.com <mailto:sanay.v.bhirud@accenture.com>; janebooth@mail.utexas.edu <mailto:janebooth@mail.utexas.edu>; cmbrooks@texas.net <mailto:cmbrooks@texas.net>; lrcampbell9@hotmail.com <mailto:lrcampbell9@hotmail.com>; chavle@TimeGateStudios.com <mailto:chavle@TimeGateStudios.com>; thomas.w.clark@accenture.com <mailto:thomas.w.clark@accenture.com>; matthew.a.cowell@accenture.com <mailto:matthew.a.cowell@accenture.com>; andrew.b.doble@accenture.com <mailto:andrew.b.doble@accenture.com>; gayla.dodson.2002@anderson.ucla.edu <mailto:gayla.dodson.2002@anderson.ucla.edu>; rosse@avanade.com <mailto:rosse@avanade.com>; hunter.estes@amd.com <mailto:hunter.estes@amd.com>; Reagan@motive.com <mailto:Reagan@motive.com>; cfalcon@ev1.net <mailto:cfalcon@ev1.net>; christinegonzalez@hotmail.com <mailto:christinegonzalez@hotmail.com>; rmhoke@yahoo.com <mailto:rmhoke@yahoo.com>; tomcat@hic.net <mailto:tomcat@hic.net>; tjhoke@home.com <mailto:tjhoke@home.com>; AMERITEX@aol.com <mailto:AMERITEX@aol.com>; larkay1@webtv.net <mailto:larkay1@webtv.net> (Laura Huffman); realest1@infohwy.com <mailto:realest1@infohwy.com>; c.kahlden@mail.utexas.edu <mailto:c.kahlden@mail.utexas.edu>; christopher.j.keel@accenture.com <mailto:christopher.j.keel@accenture.com>; nicholas.g.konat@accenture.com <mailto:nicholas.g.konat@accenture.com>; jimlewis@hic.net <mailto:jimlewis@hic.net>; flip_lewis@yahoo.com <mailto:flip_lewis@yahoo.com>; carolina_mantilla2000@yahoo.com <mailto:carolina_mantilla2000@yahoo.com>; lawrence.c.marion@accenture.com <mailto:lawrence.c.marion@accenture.com>; mattmash25@hotmail.com <mailto:mattmash25@hotmail.com>; michael.j.mclatcher@accenture.com <mailto:michael.j.mclatcher@accenture.com>; rayfes@rayfes.com <mailto:rayfes@rayfes.com>; jnovak1@pdq.net <mailto:jnovak1@pdq.net>; blarneysurfer@yahoo.com <mailto:blarneysurfer@yahoo.com>; christa.offenhauser@accenture.com <mailto:christa.offenhauser@accenture.com>; ChristinePareja@tx.slr.com <mailto:ChristinePareja@tx.slr.com>; krp315@yahoo.com <mailto:krp315@yahoo.com>; willp@milwaukeepc.com <mailto:willp@milwaukeepc.com>; jodyrigdon@yahoo.com <mailto:jodyrigdon@yahoo.com>; jrobbinson@austin.rr.com <mailto:jrobbinson@austin.rr.com>; roy.r.salvagio@accenture.com <mailto:roy.r.salvagio@accenture.com>; kdselly@yahoo.com <mailto:kdselly@yahoo.com>; lyall.d.shepperd@accenture.com <mailto:lyall.d.shepperd@accenture.com>; MSouthan@jabber.com <mailto:MSouthan@jabber.com>; Thomas, Paul D.; ethornburrow@hotmail.com <mailto:ethornburrow@hotmail.com>; ernest.trevino@accenture.com <mailto:ernest.trevino@accenture.com>; chrsvaughan@hotmail.com <mailto:chrsvaughan@hotmail.com>; andrew.p.vo@accenture.com <mailto:andrew.p.vo@accenture.com>; jonpaul.weiss@ey.com <mailto:jonpaul.weiss@ey.com>; justin.r.whitehead@accenture.com <mailto:justin.r.whitehead@accenture.com>; peter.wisniewski@mavtech.cc <mailto:peter.wisniewski@mavtech.cc>; Wade_Wynn@Dell.com <mailto:Wade_Wynn@Dell.com>; eyanta@broadjump.com <mailto:eyanta@broadjump.com>; cdurkee@apartmentsearch.com <mailto:cdurkee@apartmentsearch.com>
Subject:	man!!!

Damn, it's good to be a man......

Your last name stays put.
The garage is all  yours.
Wedding plans take care of themselves.
Chocolate is just another snack.
You can be president.
You  can wear a white T-shirt to a water park.
Car  mechanics tell you the truth.
The world is your  urinal.
You never have to drive to another gas  station because this one's just
icky.
Same work, more pay.
Wrinkles add character.
Wedding dress - $5000; tux rental - $100.
People never stare at your chest when you're talking to them.
The occasional  well-rendered belch is practically expected.
New shoes don't cut, blister, or mangle your  feet.
One mood, ALL the damn time.
Phone conversations are over in 30 seconds flat.
You know stuff about tanks.
A five-day vacation requires only one suitcase.
You can open all your own jars.
You get extra credit for the slightest act of thoughtfulness.
If someone forgets to invite  you to something, he or she can still be a
friend.
Your  underwear is $8.95 for a three-pack.
If you are  34 and single, nobody notices.
Everything on  your face stays its original color.
Three pairs  of shoes are more than enough.
You don't have  to stop and think of which way to turn a nut on a  bolt.
You almost never have strap problems in  public.
You are unable to see wrinkles in your  clothes.
The same hairstyle lasts for years,  maybe decades.
You don't have to shave below  your neck.
Your belly usually hides your big  hips.
One wallet and one pair of shoes, one  color, all seasons.
You can "do" your nails with a pocketknife.
You  have freedom of choice concerning growing a mustache.
You can do Christmas shopping for 25  relatives, on December 24, in 45
minutes.


We are pleased to announce the creation of a new group - Asset Marketing -
within Enron Americas. The Asset Marketing group will have responsibility for
the asset divestment function within Enron Americas and work with Generation
Investments on selected portfolio acquisitions as well as managing power
origination funding requirements with Treasury.

Don Miller will head the Asset Marketing group and will report directly to
the Office of the Chair, Enron Americas. Joining Don's group will be Stuart
Zisman.  Stuart was formerly in ENA Legal, having most recently worked on the
sale of ENA's peaker plants with Don.

Please join us in congratulating Don and Stuart in their new roles.


Hi Ben,

IMHO, your team needs a basic understanding of the finance and accounting
issues.  Legal should have a bit more of a developed (and probably current)
understanding of how to address the issues.  Between Development and Legal,
we should be able to get docs about 90% there.  We then take the almost
compliant docs to Accting/Finance for fine tuning.

A key action item is getting a presentation set up where there is a good
download of information from Acct/Finance to the Development group.  We had
one yesterday for Legal, and it was helpful.  I want to sit in when your
troops get the presentation, if at all possible, because I can help translate
on both sides, I believe.  I also want to make sure that Development and
Legal are on the same page.  Fire drill avoidance is a key objective.

Look forward to discussing in detail.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           05/10/2001 06:56 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann
cc:

Subject: Interface with Accounting and Global Finance

Kay:

As I mentioned, this e-mail was the product of a meeting this week with
Duran, Deffner, Bills and me. I need your help to make this work with respect
to the legal group, and would like your suggestions. I'll call you to discuss.

Regards,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 06:54 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby                           05/10/2001 06:51 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby
To: Chris Booth, Raimund Grube, Jeffrey Keenan, Steve Krimsky, Greg Krause,
Rick Whitaker, Fred Mitro, Rusty Stevens, Ron Tapscott, Matt Gimble
cc: W David Duran
Subject: Interface with Accounting and Global Finance

Guys:

As you all know, our group is in the middle of a very significant amount of
development and equipment book management activity, This hard work by all of
you has allowed us to achieve very impressive income results thus far this
year, and has set the stage for continued success. It has also placed
significant demands on internal resources that are integral to our success,
in particular those resources in Global Finance, Accounting, and Legal.

In order to ensure a proper prioritization of work flow, and that project
specific objectives and time lines are communicated, I need each of you to
come to me with all new agreements prior to seeking input from Accounting and
Global Finance. I will interface with these two groups and establish
priorities for their review.

We will continue to refine how we interface with these groups, and as such,
I'd appreciate any suggestions you would have. I plan to have a staff meeting
next week, and we can discuss it at that time.

Thanks,

Ben


Steve,
You will also find this of interest.  Evidently, the old material (possible PCB tainted) is moving into pipeline areas on SoCal's system previously undiscovered.  This is apparent since we are dry and non-detect for PCB's now at Needles.  The cost and attention to these matters will continue for TW.  John Shafer

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Campbell, Larry
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 5:57 PM
To:	Shafer, John
Cc:	Pribble, Dan; Kendrick, William; Soldano, Louis
Subject:	FYI, PCB mtg with SoCal

The third quarter PCB meeting with Southern California Gas Company was held this morning.  SoCal presented a third quarter invoce of their PCB management and disposal activities for which Transwestern is responsible for $120,602.19 (86%).  All charges were appropriate and considered normal operating expenses for PCB activities in California.  On a similar note, while speaking to Ralph Komai, PCB person for SoCal, some interesting things are happening on their system and are presented below:

SoCal is beginning to notice accumulations of PCB pipeline liquids on portions of their system which has been considered PCB clean.  It is these portions of their pipeline for which they have been petitioning EPA to declassify.  These liquids are not new liquids introductions into the SoCal system but historic liquids that have laid in their pipeline. Because of the fact that Transwestern is not seeing liquids accumulations at the compressor stations upstream of Needles, we know that liquids are not being sent inot California.  Due to the increase of Transwestern gas into the SoCal system, it appears  the gas is sweeping old historic liquids into these new pipeline areas.

SoCal will be meeting with PG&E within the next couple of weeks to discuss the discovery of pipeline liquids at an interconnect where SoCal provides natural gas to PG&E.The PCB concentrations are less than 5 ppm.  The location of this  interconnect is near Bakersfield, Ca.

Southwest Gas has requested that 2 filter separators be installed at 2 interconnects where they receive gas from SoCal.  As you know, Transwetern supplies gas to SoCal who then provides gas to Southwest.   The price of the 2 separators will be approx. $33,000 plus installation charges.  Ralph stated that theses charges will show up on the first or second quarter of 2002.  Of note, Southwest has asked SoCal to install each separator on the SoCal side of the interconnect which means that maintenance and operation of each separator will be SoCal's responsiblility.  these charges will be passed on to Transwestern at 86%.


<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>
RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	'mnavarro@gas.pemex.com@ENRON'
Cc:	Breslau, Craig; Ortiz, Lucy
Subject:	RE: Pemex Guaranty - Enron

Ms. Navarro:

Thank you for sending your comments to the guaranty.  Please note our comments below.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	mnavarro@gas.pemex.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-mnavarro+40gas+2Epemex+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 10:50 AM
To:	Breslau, Craig; Ortiz, Lucy; Heard, Marie
Cc:	crax1504@pmicim.com; gpfx2303@pmicim.com; mmax1805@pmicim.com; rhinojosa@dcf.pemex.com; xantonio@dca.pemex.com
Subject:	Pemex Guaranty - Enron

Lucy:

Following please find our Corporate Lawyers comments to the changes you
requested to the Guaranty we are working on:

1.	Recitals.  We do not see why it would be necessary to add that
"The Guarantor will directly or indirectly benefit from the
Transactions between the Beneficiary and PMI".  Please explain. [Heard, Marie]    Because (i) it is a correct statement and (ii) it clarifies the element of consideration which is essential for purposes of enforceability.

2.	Section 1.  Considering that Pemex normally needs 5 business
days to request funds in foreing currencies to the Central Bank, we
need to change the payment date to be 5 Business Days after receipt of
the Payment Demand instead of 3 days. [Heard, Marie]    We are okay with this change.

3.	Section 6. Jurisdiction.  We think that New York Jurisdiction is
a good option and probably the most experienced in terms of derivatives
trading, and therefore we prefer to keep the "exclusive" jurisdiction
of any federal court sitting in the Borough of Manhattan. [Heard, Marie]    We are okay with the "exclusive" jurisdiction.

The rest of your comments are acceptable to us.  Carlos Riveroll will
be sending you PMI?s comments to the amendment to the MSA, so we can
finalize this as soon as posible.

Best regards,

Martha Navarro

 - WINMAIL.DAT << File: WINMAIL.DAT >>


I'm HERE!!!

How about the reorg?  Mark H looks like he came out great.

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           11/09/2000 09:53 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: enovate stuff

Kay-

I will look at your copy of the LLC regarding delegation of powers (or if I
can't find it, I will get a copy from the Corporate Secretary's office).

The draft CA does not mention Peoples having to get their consultants to sign
the CA, but I can put something in.

Where are you?  I talked to Carlos today and I believe he will be with us
soon (if we can hire him).  He is anxiously awaiting your return from NY.

K-

Kay Mann
11/09/2000 09:45 AM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: enovate stuff

Hi Kathleen,

I want to get Laura Luce to direct us to give Gregg signing authority.  As
you know, the request for Ben came from Janet, not Ben. I'll check with her.
do you have the LLC agreement to see how changes are handled?  If not, you
can get a copy of my copy.  It is not a standard agreement.

On the CA, please make the effective period two years from the latest
disclosure of info, and the disclosures will be ongoing. I don't have the CA
in front of me, but does it say that Peoples has to get their consultants to
sign a CA as well?  It is a good question.

Ta ta for now,

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           11/08/2000 08:27 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: enovate stuff

Kay,

Gregg posed an interesting question yesterday regarding the Confidentiality
Agreement.  If Peoples supplies our confidential information to Arthur
Andersen, and someone from AA tells the world our secrets, would Peoples be
on the hook pursuant to our CA?  I guess one way we could take care of this
would be to include Arthur Andersen on Schedule I of the CA as one of
Peoples' Representatives.  Any thoughts?

Also, I will work on getting Gregg signing authority re his message below.

Kathleen
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 11/08/2000
08:16 AM ---------------------------
From: Gregg Penman on 11/07/2000 04:15 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: enovate stuff

Kathleen - This e-mail should aid in the preparation of the Board
Resolutions.  The attached file lists the appointment changes.  As for my
signature authority, I am expecting that I would need to sign on behalf of
enovate, L.L.C., Enron MW, L.L.C. and I suppose Enron North America by
association.  The dollar amount can be set as low as practical.  I think in
the L.L.C. agreement the Board reserves the right to approve contracts in
excess of $50,000.  The real need is for pushing paper such as CA's, Master
Purchase Agreements, etc.  Here is another question, if my authority is
limited, who has the authority to sign in excess of my limit?  Laura Luce
previously had such authority as General Manager (she is a VP at ENA).  If
she now becomes the Board Member, can she also sign on behalf of enovate?  If
so, is that because she is an officer of Enron MW or because she is a Board
Member (i.e., can Peoples Board Member sign on behalf of enovate)?

Thanks - Gregg
----- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 11/07/2000 03:47 PM -----

	Gregg Penman
	10/31/2000 11:50 AM

		 To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: enovate stuff

1)

3) I think we want it to apply to whatever entity employs the individuals
with access.  Most of these people will probably Peoples Energy Corp.
employees, but I suppose we could make it also include all of their
affiliates.  enovate can sign the CA as well, but since enovate doesn't have
any employees I was assuming we could use Peoples Energy as the responsible
legal entity.

4) After 3:00 is fine, let me know for sure soon enough that I can lock Sarah
up.

Thanks,

Gregg

	Kay Mann
	10/31/2000 11:29 AM

		 To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: enovate stuff

1)The cybergoblins ate the attachment.
2) OK
3) Which Peoples is it?  Also, I think enovate should sign at CA.
4)  I sent Heather an email re her availability.  There's a bunch of
construction near downtown, so I would hesitate to commit to an early call,
but I know I'm free after 300 tomorrow.

Kay

From: Gregg Penman on 10/31/2000 11:25 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: enovate stuff

Kay -

1) Attached is my quick attempt at writing something to make the management
changes at enovate that we discussed.  Could you please review this and add
the appropriate legal language.  I don't think that we need any Board
approval for any of these changes, so is some type of notification sufficient?

2)  I would like to address the idea of signature authorities other than
Laura at the same time.  My suggestion would be that Richard and myself be
granted some level of authority to execute CA's, Master Agreements, etc. that
have been reviewed and approved by legal.  If you can at least pull the
template you used to get approval for the Director you mentioned and see if
there would be any changes necessary that would be helpful.

3) I need to get the CA form for the curves and other information started.
We can discuss this any time you want.

4) What is your availability tomorrow either 8-9:15 or after 3:00 to discuss
the intercompany loan agreement, and will Heather be available?

I will be leaving around 2:00 for suburban trick or treating.

Thanks,

Gregg


Stinson

Thanks

P.S.

At the end of the term of each simulation do we assume that we close the position on that date and take a hit or do we leave the simulation with an open positon.


How does the following flight sound?

Flight arriving in Calgary 5:10 pm Tuesday March 6
Flight leaving Calgary 8:05 am Sunday March 11

If those days look good for you, I'll have Taffy book the flights...


None of the following CPs are authorized to trade any U.S. power products:

Bridgeline Gas Marketing LLC
Retex, Inc.
Shoreline Gas Inc.

We do not have a trading relationship with any of these CPs, and credit has
restricted them from trading U.S. power products as well.

Leslie


Whenever I get an e-mail from the following people please-make sure the mtgs
lisited are on my calendar: sarah dennison-leonard, barny speckman, Mark
wood, deanna carry


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000 09:24 AM -----

	Rodney Malcolm
	09/26/2000 03:01 PM

		 To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Finley Biggerstaff/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Garden State - Plan B & C

This should clarify my voice mails from earlier today.  I am a little nervous
that Citibank may not come through and as a reault need to create a backup up
plan.  The backup plan is to B) do the ONP & NP swap with National Bank of
Canada or C) do the ONP swaps with Waste Management and the NP swaps with
National Bank of Canada.   In order to do this we will need to create the
following documentation:

1) New Master ISDA with National Bank of Canada and Garden State Paper LLC.
There will be no netting side letter and no special optional termination
event.  The Master ISDA should match the ENA - NBC Master exactly except that
the collateral threshold needs to be $1million dollars.  Finley will create
the confirmations.

2) New Master ISDA with Waste Management and Garden State Paper LLC.  There
will be no netting side letter and no special optional termination event.
The Master ISDA should match the ENA - Waste Management exactly.  Finley will
create the confirmations.

Please let me know ASAP if there will be any problems in getting these doc's
prepared for mid morning tomorrow.

Thanks for all the hard work on a tight time frame.
Rodney


We will probably be making some briefing presentations after the open season ends on August 30th.  Based on the high level of customer interest expressed thus far we expect to receive strong support for our proposed project.  At this point in time we have not yet scheduled any particular meetings however are there any specific dates in Sept. that would work on the Governor's office schedule?  Should you have any other questions, please feel free to e-mail or call me at (402) 398-7419.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Craig Marks <CraigM@azcommerce.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Craig+20Marks+20+3CCraigM+40azcommerce+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 5:40 PM
To:	Hass, Glen
Subject:	RE: Transwestern Sun Devil Expansion

Glen,

	Thanks for the info.  It sure looks good on paper.  We need the
capacity.  Are you planning a face-to-face briefing with the ACC; if so, it
would be good to brief the Governor's office as well.


Bob and Mary,

Please talk to Vance Taylor about this.

Daren

Mary Poorman@ENRON
08/02/2000 09:12 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986563 -

Daren,

This deal began in May, 2000.  I don't have a deal to book to from 12/99  -
04/00.  Could you please retro the deal, or please tell me whom I need to
speak to to clear this matter up?  Thank you for your time and patience

The Rookie

ext. 35251
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 08/02/2000 09:09
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert Cotten @ ECT                           08/01/2000 02:52 PM

To: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Meter # 0986563 -

Mary,

BJD-ESS Corp is selling this gas to HPLC.  The deal ticket # is 258345.  This
is a gathering contract that is attached to the wellhead portfolio.  Let me
know if you need any other information.

Bob

Mary Poorman@ENRON
08/01/2000 02:17 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986563 -

Bob,

Could you help me find out who owns the gas at this meter......

Thank you

Mary
ext. 35251

Mary Poorman
08/01/2000 01:04 PM
To: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Meter # 0986563 -

Pat,

This is the Texaco Fee CP, it flowed a total of 1,517 from Dec 99 to Apr 2
2000.  There is a Strangers Agmt. set up to take allocations, however, this
must be a wellhead related pt. that has declined.  How do I go about finding
out who this belongs to?  I thought about ringing Texaco, but, wanted to
check before I made any calls.

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 08/01/2000 01:01
PM ---------------------------

	Anita Luong @ ECT
	08/01/2000 10:29 AM

To: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Meter # 0986563 -

Stephanie, you are correct.  There's no deal set up for this meter from 12/99
thru 4/2000.

Mary, please take a look at the meter for the months in question and let
Stephanie or myself know whose gas this belongs to.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000 10:24
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           08/01/2000 09:39 AM

To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter # 0986563 -

Anita,
If you are no longer handling this meter, please pass this email on to the
correct person.

For meter # 6563, I have meter statements showing that volume did flow for
12/99 - 4/00 production on this meter.  I am not seeing this volume in volume
management for these production months.  For 5/00 and 6/00 production, the
volumes are there.  Is the reason because a deal number needs to be set up?
Please let me know.

Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )


Thank you all for your warm congratulatory words.  Arianna is now 1 month
old and is doing great (I promise you will not get an email like this every
month).  Kati is also
doing great.    Here are some photos for your viewing pleasure.

Jon

(See attached file: aep1.jpg)(See attached file: aep2.jpg)(See attached
file: aep3.jpg)(See attached file: aep4.jpg)(See attached file: aep5.jpg)
 - aep1.jpg
 - aep2.jpg
 - aep3.jpg
 - aep4.jpg
 - aep5.jpg


Please include the following email addresses on the bidweek pricing data
distribution list.

mhenergy@yahoo.com
kdoole@mh.com

Thanks,
Mike


Mr. Jess K. Hyatt
Director
Enron Transportation Services

Dear Mr. Hyatt:

In the wake of recent events, I want to confirm that CERA is proceeding
with CERAWeek 2002, to be held in Houston, Texas on February 11-15,
2002.   This year's theme  "The New Face of Risk: Energy Strategies for
the Changed World" will offer timely insight on the new economic and
geopolitical realities - and their implications for the energy future.
The events of the past weeks have had a profound impact on all segments
of the energy industry. We look forward to our February gathering as an
opportunity for leaders of the energy community to exchange ideas.  For
complete details of the event, please visit our website at:
http://www.cera.com/ceraweek2002

To help us plan for such a large-scale event, we ask you to consider
registering early this year.  To acknowledge your early commitment and
support for CERAWeek, we are offering significant incentives for early
registration, as follows:

* Flexible Enrollment Options - Beginning this year, the standard CERA
advisory service agreements include a two-day conference pass - clients
can choose between Oil & Gas events (Tuesday and Wednesday) or Gas &
Power events (Wednesday afternoon through Friday luncheon). For an
additional fee, clients using pre-paid seats may choose a four-day
CERAWeek pass.

* Early Registration Incentive - Clients registering prior to November
30 will be automatically upgraded from the standard two-day pass to a
four-day pass to allow you to maximize the value of and insights derived
from CERAWeek.

* Online Registration - CERA.com members will be able to register online
at http://www.cera.com/ceraweek2002/register/ . Non-members can complete
an online application for registration at the same site.

CERAWeek 2002 will feature several innovations designed to enhance your
experience and interaction:

* Security Enhancements - Including tightened registration and
credentialing, and other measures in advance and on-site.  We are
committed to preserving the relaxed and informal interaction that is a
hallmark of CERAWeek, and appreciate your understanding for any
inconvenience caused by these necessary precautions.

* Expert Briefings - Focused, highly interactive sessions including
presentation and discussion with CERA experts and industry peers.

* Strategic Tracks - Finance, Environment, Technology and Markets -
Offering an integrated agenda across the week, underscoring the key
linkages and common themes across energy segments and regions.

* Enhanced CERAWeek Online - Expanded multimedia coverage offering
highlights and interviews, conference panels, live simulcasts, and
coverage of keynote, plenary, and expert briefing presentations allow
participants to gain lasting value; and to share the learning and
sessions across your organization. This enhanced coverage will be
available on an enterprise-wide basis for an additional fee; early
enrollees (prior to December 15) will receive a 20% discount. More
information on this new feature can be found on our website at:
http://www.cera.com/ceraweek2002/cw02_premium.pdf .

CERAWeek 2002 is our most tangible expression of commitment to the
global energy community. Your participation is very meaningful. I wish
to thank you for your continued confidence in CERA. I hope that you will
register now to attend what we believe will be CERA's most important
event.

For more information on the program and registration options please
visit http://www.cera.com/ceraweek2002 or call Steve McCarthy at +1 617
441 1308 or email smccarthy@cera.com with any further questions or
considerations.

Best regards,

Daniel Yergin
CERA Chairman

*****************************************************************
Our relationship with you is very important to us.  Should you prefer
not to receive future e-mail notifications, please send a reply to
this message with "DoNotEmail" as the subject of your message.
( mailto:info@cera.com?subject=DoNotEmail )  Please indicate whether
you wish to be removed from the conference list or alternatively from
the list for any future CERA notifications.
*****************************************************************


Start Date: 4/27/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


-----Original Message-----
From: Molly Meyers [mailto:mollyadams123@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 9:22 PM
To: Meyers, Albert
Subject: Fwd: FW: Laid-Off A No Nothing Production

From: Molly Meyers <mmeyers@KPTV.com>
To: "'mollyadams123@hotmail.com'" <mollyadams123@hotmail.com>
Subject: FW: Laid-Off A No Nothing Production
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 16:56:38 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [208.252.88.163] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
MHotMailBE120F4800194004379FD0FC58A30A390; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 16:56:40 -0800
Received: by SERVER2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)id <DCNDPDCH>;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 16:56:39 -0800
From mmeyers@KPTV.com Fri, 18 Jan 2002 16:57:03 -0800
Message-ID: <66DAECDAAA5ED011A1CF00009296074201B73C47@SERVER2>
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

-----Original Message-----
From: Linda Huey
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Molly Meyers
Subject: FW: Laid-Off A No Nothing Production

-----Original Message-----
From: Marco Coleman
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:39 PM
To: Linda Huey
Subject: Laid-Off A No Nothing Production

  http://www.oddtodd.com/index2.html

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 09/07/2000
05:34 PM ---------------------------

Ann M Schmidt@ENRON
09/07/2000 01:04 PM

To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRO
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: CNN Headline News Story

Rick,

Below is the transcript of the story you asked about this morning.  I have a
video copy of it as well that you can view upon your return.  Thanks, Ann
---------------------- Forwarded by Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron on 09/07/2000
12:58 PM ---------------------------

"Dave Vigil" <dvigil@vidmon.com> on 09/07/2000 11:00:21 AM
Please respond to <dvigil@vidmon.com>
To: <aschmid@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Video Monitoring Services of America, L.P. (VMS)

BROADCAST TRANSCRIPT
Video Monitoring Services of America, Inc.
10260 Westheimer
Houston, TX 77042
(713) 789-1635
(713) 789-0980 (FAX)

    Date      September 07, 2000
    Time      08:00 AM - 08:30 AM
    Station   CNN Headline News
Location  Network
Program   Headline News

Jacque Reid, anchor:
To save money, consumers are finding ways to cut down on costly electricity
bills.  Greg Clarking reports on how to get better rates using the Internet.
Greg Clarking reporting:
Helene Baldizzone, a New York City artist, was growing increasingly
concerned about rising electricity costs, so she signed up with start-up
electricity retailer SmartEnergy.com.
Helene Baldizzone (SmartEnergy.com Customer):  I thought, OK, well, let's
try somebody else because the bills had been going up little by little every
month with ConEdison.  So I thought, well, I have nothing to lose at this
point.
Clarking:  Baldizzone is happy with SmartEnergy where she has locked in a
rate of 8.3 cents per kilowatt hour.  She was paying as much as 13.3 cents
per kilowatt hour before switching.  SmartEnergy says its goal is to let
consumers take advantage of the sometimes confusing options created by
deregulation of the energy industry.
Gautam Chandra (President/CEO, SmartEnergy.com):  What we are doing is
taking that confusion away by being the agents for the customer in terms of
looking at the best prices, locking in the best prices for them.
Clarking:  SmartEnergy, currently available in New York City, will be
available in all twenty-four deregulated states within the next few months.
There are a number of electricity suppliers in each of the deregulated
states and consumers can save a lot of money by doing a little research.
Rick Cowles (Energyland.com):  Don't sit back and just hang in there and
wait and see what's going to happen a year or two down the road because
you're going to find that electric rates have definitely changed in a year
or two and it may not be to your advantage.
Clarking:  To find out what energy options are available in your area, you
can call your state's public utility commission or click on to
Energyland.com for a complete list of energy suppliers and their rates.
Cowles:  Right now, consumers are kind of in a unique position where they do
have the ability to go in and see some immediate savings.
Baldizzone:  It's easy.  But I like especially saving the money.  It's
better in my pocket.
Clarking:  That's Your Money.  Greg Clarking, CNN, New York.

                        # # #

For a videocassette(TV) or audiocassette(radio) of this news segment contact
your nearest VMS office Material supplied by Video Monitoring Services may
only be used for internal review, analysis or research.  Any publication,
re-broadcast or public display for profit is forbidden.


Kate for our deal 582589 and 582423 these deals according to Bloomberg the
fee should be $15.00.  Please pass on to Mark and Tom.

Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001
04:15 PM ---------------------------

"PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on 04/17/2001
03:46:36 PM
To: Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Commission

That is the commission for those trades. The rate that Bloomberg Powermatch
now charges for cash trades is $15 per trade.

----- Original Message -----
From: Evelyn Metoyer  <Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com>
At:  4/17 16:43

>
>
> For the two deals traded on yesterday with Tom and Mark the fee is showing
> as $15.00 flat on both confirmations.  Can you send revisions.
> The numbers are 20010416410003 and 20010416410002
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> "PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on
> 04/17/2001 03:25:00 PM
>
> To:   Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Re: Commission
>
>
> That is not the case. I know what Mark and Tom trade, I apologize if I
> misspoke. All daily trades, as well as hourly trades will now be a flat fee
> charge of $15 per trade. This covers any size transaction.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Evelyn Metoyer  <Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com>
> At:  4/17 16:20
>
> >
> > Tom and Mark are not spot traders, they're cash traders. The Real Time
> guys
> > are now being charged $15 for trades - but cash and term traders should
> > still be charged the traditional $.005.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on
> > 04/17/2001 02:28:57 PM
> >
> > To:   Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
> > cc:
> >
> > Subject:  Commission
> >
> >
> > Evelyn, as of April 16, 2001 our charge for Spot trades is a flat fee of
> > $15/trade.


Attached  are the February preliminary numbers.....

Janet, for March 1,  I have confirmed 3,000 3rd party at the San jac meter
(1554)...

Thank you!


put on calendar
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
09:21 AM ---------------------------

Judy Zoch@ENRON
01/23/2001 08:44 AM
To:
cc:  (bcc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Financial Trading Dinner

You are cordially invited to attend our annual Financial Trading Dinner.

DATE:  Tuesday, February 6th

TIME:  5:30 p.m. - 10:00 p.m.

PLACE: Pappas Bros. Steakhouse
  5839 Westheimer
  713-780-7352

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me on ext.
30655.

Thank you,

Judy Zoch
for Gary Hickerson


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Wincenty J. Kaminski
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: WJK-Rutgers-5-23-01
Report Total: $2,478.24
Amount Due Employee: $2,478.24

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


This book request has been completed. Please call me when you have any questions.

Thank you.

Jennifer Velasco
Risk Controls
X 5-2526


I have copied the GTC and confirm templates for ENA Upstream Committed Reserves and Wellhead Pooling Point deals into our common drive under the O:/Global_Data/Contracts/ENA Upstream subdirectory.  I am still waiting to get a finalized version of the Point Specific GTC from Gerald.  I will copy that in the copy drive once it is finalized and approved by legal.  Gerald, can you please let me know the status on that???

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Please note that the pooling point version is the revised version provided by Gerald.

Thanks,
SBR x30569


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041612.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 12 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
1/10/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 2,542.
1/10/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 29,505.
1/10/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 1,551,575.
1/10/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 131,929.
1/10/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 1,671,464.


ABB is struggling with a fundamental assignment issue.  Their concern appears
to relate to assignment to a project company or contractor which might not
have the financial ability to pay.  I believe they are looking for some type
of security (LC, bond, guaranty).  I didn't sense that they have an issue
with the identity of the assignee, just the ability to pay.

Comments?

Kay


Let me know if you need anything else.  Susan is out today, so Shona and I will try to address any requests you might have today.  Susan will be back tomorrow.

Chris Abel
Manager, Risk Controls
Global Risk Operations
chris.abel@enron.com <mailto:chris.abel@enron.com>
713.853.3102


Was Dave Porter able to attend the last new hire dinner in January? Amy requested that I check to see if we need to include him on the next dinner.

Let me know.

Thanks!
-Grace


Sorry I haven't responded Laura.? The 19th is bad for me because I won't be
finished with finals, and it sounds like everyone can't make it then anyway.?
My vote is for the? 22nd, 8:30pm, and Benji's.?

I look forward to seeing everyone, especially since the last time I saw
several of you was not a good time for me.?
See you girls then, Ashley


Guys--

First of all, Louise, I understand we have a baby??  CONGRATULATIONS!!
(details please, at your earliest chance)

Regarding the Wharton e-Business Initiative (see below for one of the many
eMails I've received concerning Enron's participation--link to the referenced
web site for specific agenda; also, I've received several voice messages from
leaders of the effort).  The information below discusses one of the  forums
(coming up 5/31-6/1) that comprise an on-going e-business initiative in which
Enron has invested with Wharton.

 The participants from Wharton include senior level professors; while there
may be some student involvement, the intentional focus is high level
discussion and research endeavors at the professorial level.
Other participants in WeBI are Corporate representatives.  The idea is for
the professors to offer their latest research issues, promote discussions
among the corporate participants to talk through the professors research and
other research in the literature, as well as for the professors to listen for
new areas for which commercial eBusinesses are seeking new research.

Again,  this is intentionally designed as a High Level Professor
participation on the Wharton side, and high level e-Business Corporate
executives on the other side. This is intentionally designed to create a
high-level 'e-think-tank' environment for senior level professors and
corporate executives.

O.K.....have I labored enough to describe what WeBI is all about??

As opposed to the several other efforts Enron University Affairs has to
DIRECTLY increase Enron's favorability and familiarity on campus at levels
above recruiting, but that ultimately trickle down to recruiting, this is
intentionally a research/discussion effort. Clearly, the Enron Brand equity
in dealing with professors is that the professors ultimately incorporate work
from information from the participatory forums into their class teachings,
references, course work, etc.

A few weeks ago, Louise and I breifly chatted about Enron's involvement in
this effort.  Clearly, there is a HUGE interest by the Wharton professors and
other corporate participants involved to have Enron attend and
participate---they quite respectfully call me and eMail me very
frequently.......All of this is very interesting to me and I have shepherded
our minimal involvement-in-fact........ yet the question remains:  is there
someone at Enron, directly involved in Enron's eBusiness initiatives,
interested in jumping into this effort and participating?  Do those of you
involved in these businesses think it worth your time and expense, or the
time and expense of one of your senior (at least Director level) people to
participate?  Would it be viewed, at least at this time,  simply as an "Enron
brain drain" (I've received this realistic and possibly quite legitimate
concern from more than one business person at Enron).

The bottom line is, I'd like to be able to respond intelligently and honestly
to those at Wharton committed to this effort.  I feel more than comfortable
telling Wharton that, at this time, Enron is satisfied to participate in the
WeBI effort largely at the
financial level it has already invested--with the option to participate at
other levels in the future, at Enron's discretion.

ALL comments solicited----

Many thanks!!

--Christie.

---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001
04:02 PM ---------------------------

HartleyR <HartleyR@wharton.upenn.edu> on 05/21/2001 03:03:44 PM
To: "'Christie_Patrick@enron.com'" <Christie_Patrick@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: ICG/Wharton Forum meeting May 31-June 1

Christie,

Lee Goldring, our new Forum director mentioned that he placed a call to you
to introduce himself and follow up on Enron's representation at the next
meeting.  I'm emailing this information to you to alert you to the situation
since I do not think you would want Enron to go unrepresented at the next
meeting. To date, no one from Enron has registered for the Forum sponsored
Online Conversion Workshop,  the Forum meeting on 5/31 or the Members Only
meeting on 6/1.  Please note that the "From Browsers to Buyers: Online
Conversion Workshop" on May 30th is purely optional in case some folks from
Enron are interested in attending.  Since the Forum is co-sponsoring the
Workshop -- WeBI affiliated registrants will not be charged the $495
registration fee as an added benefit for their sponsorship.

Here are all the relevent links to the Forum agenda and registration sites
for your convenience:

Forum Agenda:  http://webi.wharton.upenn.edu/meetingNotes/m_n_5_01.asp
Forum Registration site: http://ecom.wharton.upenn.edu/conferencereg/Reg.asp

From Browsers to Buyers: Online Conversion Workshop:
http://aresty-direct.wharton.upenn.edu/execed/conversion/index.html

Please let me know if there's anything I can help you with.

Best regards,

Robin

Robin Hartley
Associate Director
Wharton Electronic Business Initiative

University of Pennsylvania
Vance Hall - Room 415
3733 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA  19104
tel (215) 898-4158/fax (215) 898-1905
hartleyr@wharton.upenn.edu
http://webi.wharton.upenn.edu


---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 06/15/99 08:56
AM ---------------------------
From: Christi L Nicolay on 06/14/99 04:05 PM
To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Williams Memo draft

Comments?


2000Greetings.com <http://www.2000greetings.com/>
Free Newsletter #32
-- October 18th 2001 --

  _____

If Links are not clickable please go to our home page
and look under NEW Cards
<http://www.2000greetings.com/>

*FREE* Inkjet Cartridges ..*FREE* Inkjet Cartridges !
Buy ONE Cartridge, Get TWO Free On Most Epson
and Most Canon Inkjet Printer Cartridges!
Separate Pricing For HP and Lexmark.
CLICK HERE for complete list of cartridges and media paper
Click Here! <http://by.advertising.com/1/c/68000/27453/104578/104578>
<http://by.advertising.com/1/c/68000/27453/104578/104578>
_______________________
Friendship is a beautiful gift
<http://www.2000greetings.com/inspire54.htm>
_______________________
Have a Hoppy Hoppy Day!
<http://www.2000greetings.com/friend50.htm>
________________________________________
Find your baby picture in seconds on the Internet
<http://www.2000greetings.com/funbaby.htm>
___________________
I thought of you today
<http://www.2000greetings.com/inspire5.htm>
___________
Life's Design
<http://www.2000greetings.com/inspire36.htm>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
12 CDs for FREE (plus s&h)! What are you waiting for?
This great deal alone should be music to your ears.
With so many titles to choose from, you're bound to
find some essential titles you just can't live without!
Click for more details <http://by.advertising.com/1/c/68000/27996/104578/104578>.
<http://by.advertising.com/1/c/68000/27996/104578/104578>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you feel someone has added you to our newsletter
without you knowing please click the link below

<http://www.2000greetings.com/abuse.htm>

Thanks for Joining Us.
2000Greetings Staff

The most unique Greeting Card Site on the net!
2000Greetings.com <http://www.2000greetings.com/>

For questions please click here <http://www.2000greetings.com/questions.htm>

If you can't open a card please try again later,We have
thousands of members that open these cards at the same time.

  <http://www.postalmanager.com/eo/?tid=2000greetings-12>

* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
Remove Me From This Mailing List <http://www.postalmanager.com/remove/?i=TLOKEY@ENRON.COM&m=rx8gmykbmzropg7fs7bz>
http://www.postalmanager.com/remove/?i=TLOKEY@ENRON.COM&m=rx8gmykbmzropg7fs7bz

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.