Kay-I have reviewed the GE acknowledgment, and I believe it does everything
InterGen would want in that GE permits the multiple transfers all the way to
the project company (Larkspur) and GE acknowledges that the transfers will
not result in a breach of the Facility Agreements.  I have also reviewed the
unanimous consents and find them to be OK.

I propose going back to George with the proposal that simultaneously with
the execution of the unanimous consent that ENA be permitted to exercise its
puts under the two LLC, which can be done with InterGen's consent and
InterGen's receipt of an acknowledgment from GE that the exercise of the put
will not in any manner prejudice the rights under the Facility Agreements
(which in view of the transfer of the turbines and the Facility Agreements
being permitted by GE, such a request may be superfluous, but I'd like to
have it anyway).

I considered also recommending a release from ENA's obligations under the
Letter Agreements, but I think that may be pushing too far.

Let me know your thoughts.

Regards

John

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Okay, I wasn't sure who to route this to, but one of our traders gave Claire
Neri at UGI my name and number to help with information about our contracts.
As it turns out, we do not have a Master Contract with UGI but have a firm
term deal  attached to a GTC (Deal #345010, running from 11/1/00 - 3/31/01,
5380 MMBTu/day @ $4.78, meter #103702 on ANR).

UGI's hope is to get a Master agreement in place ASAP to cover the above
mentioned deal & any new inter gas deals (since she sent their master, I'm
assuming that their intent is to put their master in place ASAP). Claire Neri
can be reached at 610-796-3505 for additional information of
changes/negotiations.

Note: UGI is also an EOL "Investment Grade" counterparty for non-Texas natual
gas.

---------------------- Forwarded by Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron on
11/03/2000 01:38 PM ---------------------------

"Neri, Claire J." <cneri@ugi.com> on 11/03/2000 01:06:01 PM
Please respond to "Claire J. Neri" <cneri@ugi.com>
To: "Cindy Balfour-Flannigan" <cbalfou@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Contract

Cindy, Thanks for your help. - Claire
 - ugimaster.doc


458 deals
6 new, 452 existing

Shari Mao
07/11/2000 05:38 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: June Hours

Please send me the number of new and active deals for producer services


Daniel,

I do remember working on an assignment agreement regarding the assignment of
the Columbia Energy contracts with MSCGI  to Enron North America Corp.  I
will need to find the document.

It is my understanding that, with the exception of one deal, all the deals
between ENA and MSCGI are firm deals of greater than one month duration.  ENA
uses the GISB for month or less firm deals and interruptible deals of any
length as recommended by the Gas Industry Standards Board.  For firm deals
that are longer than one month, ENA uses a master firm agreement if one
exists.  If there is no master firm agreement, we send out our General Terms
and Conditions with our confirmation.  That answers your question of why
Ellen sent our GTC when there is a GISB in place.

It appears to me that you and I need to work on getting a master firm
agreement in place.  Please let me know your thoughts.

Stacy

	Daniel Garcia <Daniel.Garcia@msdw.com>
	03/13/2001 01:54 PM
	Please respond to Daniel.Garcia

		 To: stacy.e.dickson@enron.com
		 cc: "Hansen, Marie" <Marie.Hansen@msdw.com>, "Hart, Deborah"
<Deborah.Hart@msdw.com>
		 Subject: Enron GISB

Stacy,

The pieces of the puzzle are starting to fall into place.? Thank you for the
fax of the Columbia Energy GISB.

Please note that we have a Transfer and Termination Agreement (dated January
1, 2000), whereby certain Columbia Energy financial and purchase & sale
agreements were terminated by Enron North America Corp.? The Columbia Energy
GISB was not referenced in the Transfer and Termination Agreement, so I'm
assuming the GISB survived the termination process.

Did our two companies enter into an assignment & novation agreement, or other
similar document, specific to the Columbia Energy GISB?

Also, please let me know what conclusion you and Ellen have reached in regard
to the long-form/GTC issue.? I thank you for your help.

Kind Regards,
Dan
212-761-8660


Thanks.

I won't be home until 6.  Have meeting ,. Will call when I leave
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


I could be wrong, but I believe that the only industrial Cary spoke to was Cargill.  I will look through his files and see if I find anything else.

Gregg

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tomaski, Richard
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:34 PM
To:	Penman, Gregg
Cc:	Mims, Patrice L.; Luce, Laura
Subject:	industrials info

Can you forward Cary's old industrials info to Patrice?


Part 1 of 3 Parts

Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange
The Newsletter for the True Texas Longhorn Faithful

Volume 11, No. 23, September 10, 2001

 Defense, Vasher-Led Special Teams Bail Out
Anemic Offense in 44-14 Win Over Tar Heels

The Longhorns have two-thirds of an outstanding team  as they showed Saturday
before another sellout home crowd in a 44-14 rout of North Carolina.
Coach Mack Brown's defense and special teams, led by Nathan Vasher's
school-record punt returns, were simply too much for Brown's old team.
But be thankful it wasn't a powerhouse across the line of scrimmage Saturday.
The Tar Heels might have the second-best defense the Longhorns will see this
year, but their offense is as bad as their defense is good.
The Texas offense, after two games, simply isn't hitting on all cylinders.
There are way too many three-and-outs and way too many drives that end almost
as soon as they start.
To stay in the top 5, or even in the top 10, the Longhorns must develop an
offense that moves the ball on most possessions, even when it fails to score.
An offense like that pays huge dividends in two ways. First, it helps win the
all-important field position battle. Second, it gives a team's defense time
to rest.
But this game, while it was a nail-biter for a half, turned into a runaway
primarily because of the tough UT defense, Vasher, DE Cory Redding and the
find of the year - freshman walk-on kicker Dusty Mangum.
The Longhorn defense held North Carolina to 211 yards total offense and
Redding scored the game's first touchdown on a 22-yard pass interception
return that included an awesome dive into the end zone to avoid two tacklers.
Vasher broke a 96-game Longhorn drought in touchdown punt returns, set up
another easy TD with a 59-yard punt return to the Tar Heel 5 and  kept the
crowd on its feet regularly with exciting punt returns. He also gift-wrapped
a touchdown for North Carolina when he bobbled a bouncing punt at the UT 17.
Mangum, the gritty young kicker from Mesquite, booted a 49-yard field goal
into the wind on the last play of the first half to send the Longhorns into
the dressing room with a 20-14 lead and some momentum.
He later kicked a 51-yarder and a 36-yarder and is perfect this season on
eight extra points and five field goals. Not bad for a walk-on.
Coach Brown said after the game a 30-point victory is to be enjoyed not
critiqued, but the Longhorns need to use this open date to figure out a way
to run the ball better and be more consistent on offense. A bunch of
three-and-outs in a row will get them beat pretty soon if they don't.

Here, briefly, is how the game went

First Quarter
Texas won the toss and deferred. Just like last week, that decision paid off
because most of the first quarter was played in North Carolina territory.
After an exchange of punts, Tar Heel QB Ronald Curry's pass in the right flat
was intercepted at the 22 by Redding, who ran it back to about the 5 and then
leaped over two would-be tacklers into the end zone. Mangum kicked the extra
point to give UT a 7-0 lead with 10:04 left. The Longhorn defense forced
another quick punt and Vasher got loose on a 59-yard punt return to the 5. He
almost scored but lost his balance tip-tooeing down the sideline after
leaping over one Tar Heel. An offside penalty moved it inside the 3. TB
Victor Ike ran to the 1, then QB Chris Simms scored. Mangum kicked the extra
point for a 14-0 lead with 6:45 left. The Longhorns had no first downs at
this point. After the kickoff,  Curry led the Tar Heels on an impressive
77-yard scoring drive to cut the deficit to 14-7 with 3:44 left. The Lo
nghorns ran only nine plays and had just 17 yards offensively in the quarter,
while North Carolina ran 23 plays and had 105 yards offensively.

Second Quarter
Vasher tried to scoop up a low bouncing punt at the UT 17 early in the period
and North Carolina scored in two plays to tie at 14-14 with 12:40 left. He
came right back with a 31-yard return to the Tar Heel 18. Three plays later
the Longhorns were on the 19, facing fourth-and-11, so Mangum kicked a
36-yard field goal for a 17-14 lead with 5:48 left. Simms led the Horns on a
51-yard drive in the final 45 seconds, connecting on four passes for 46 yards
to set up Mangum's clutch 49-yard FG into the wind on the final play for a
20-14 lead at the half. The Longhorns had 122 offensive yards in the period
to the Tar Heels' 54.

Third Quarter
UT went 3-and-out to start the second half, and the Tar Heels went deep on
their first play after the punt, but CB Quentin Jammer, after being burned on
a couple of long passes in the first half, made a lunging interection at the
UT 14. After an exchange of punts, UT put together its only long TD drive,
going 89 yards in 12 plays to take a 26-14 lead with 2:25 left. Simms tried
to pass for the two-point conversion, but it failed. RB Ivan Williams had a
31-yard run and Simms completed four passes for 31 yards. Freshman RB Cedric
Benson got the score on a 7-yard run. Texas had 121 offensive yards in the
quarter and the Longhorn defense gave the Tar Heels fits, allowing them to
run only seven plays for minus 5 yards.

Fourth Quarter
Mangum's 51-yard field goal to start the fourth quarter gave Texas a 29-14
lead. Then the UT kickoff team forced the Tar Heels to start their next
possession at the NC 5. Curry tried to pass on first down and DT Maurice
Gordon sacked him in the end zone for a safety and a 31-14 lead just 27
seconds deep in the quarter. Vasher's 44-yard punt return for a touchdown
with 9:06 left put UT on top, 38-14. Longhorn LB Reed Boyd's interception at
the North Carolina 14 set up TB Brett Robin's 12-yard TD run with 36 seconds
left, then backup QB Major Applewhite took a knee on the extra-point play,
leaving the score at 44-14 to honor Cole Pittman, the UT player who was
killed in a vehicle accident in February.

Pittman Ceremony

The Longhorns gave Cole Pittman's family an honorary T-Ring before the game
Saturday. In a tradition started nearly 50 years ago by Darrell Royal,
T-Rings are presented to every Longhorn football player who graduates.
Pittman was killed in an automobile accident last February while returning to
UT for spring football practice. He was a junior defensive tackle.
When the Longhorns scored late in the game to reach the 44-point plateau,
redshirt freshman quarterback Chance Mock, who was Pittman's best friend on
the team, told coach Mack Brown the score matched Pittman's jersey number.
Texas did not try to kick the extra point after the score, electing to take a
knee to preserve the final score in Pittman's honor.

900 Number Updated Daily

I update my 900 number every day with football and football recruiting news.
The number is 1-900-288-8839. It costs $1.59 a minute. You must be 18 or
older to call.

Coach's Corner

Coach Mack Brown said Sunday he wants the Longhorn offense to develop more
consistency, but he also said he isn't worried about much of anything when
his team posts a 44-14 win.
"We're stressing the team, not individuals and stats, this year," he said.
"I'm not into statistics, how much we run it,  or how much we throw it."
"I'm not as concerned about all that as I am about is time of possession, the
number of plays we have as compared to them, the kicking game and turnovers."
But he said, "We haven't had as many explosive runs or passes as I would like
to see."
The UT staff defines explosive plays as runs of 12 yards or more and passes
of 16 yards or more.
In two games this season, both lop-sided victories, the Longhorns have run
the ball 80 times and they have had only six runs of 12 yards or more. They
have thrown 75 passes and have completed six of 16 yards or more.
Brown said the Longhorns have been very conservative offensively and have
forced the run in situations where the defensive formation normally would
cause a pass to be called.
"We're still not clicking on offense all the time," he said, but said one
reason "is we're forcing the run some now in situations that we probably
won't later in the year."
He said he wants the team to be able to run the ball when it wants to run it
at times because a solid running game is necessary to pick up short-yardage
first downs, keep some pressure off the quarterback and run the clock to
protect a lead late in the game.
But, as a whole, Brown said he was very happy with the victory over his
former school.
"After studying the film, I'm really pleased about almost everything. There
are still a lot of things we can improve but nearly everything was positive."
"The special teams were very exciting and really helped us win the game, but
(the fumbled punt) gave them a touchdown," he said. "We've got some things to
work on."
Brown said the offense "had 326 yards against them and they were giving up
only 255 yards a game against Oklahoma and Maryland. The Carolina defensive
line is very good. I think they have six or seven pro prospects on their
defense."
True freshmen LB Derrick Johnson led the team in tackles and had two sacks,
and Brown said he "has the ability to play as good as anybody in the country.
He's tall, he's fast and he likes to hit. I think he's got a chance to be
really special."

Sooners Still Outlaws

I normally don't write a lot about the other teams in the Big 12 unless I am
previewing their games with Texas.
But the University of Oklahoma issued an interesting press release about 10
days ago. Here's how it went, in part:
"Lynn McGruder, who began his college football career at Tennessee, is
enrolled at Oklahoma, University of Oklahoma athletic officials said today.
According to head football coach Bob Stoops, McGruder has yet to join the
football program."
"Stoops said that McGruder is not practicing or participating in any football
team activities and will not be until a past off-the-field incident is
resolved."
"OU expects its student-athletes to represent the best values of the
university both on and off the field," Stoops said. "We have set very high
standards of excellence, and we are not going to compromise them in any way."
"Our process of evaluating Lynn McGruder has included intensive conversations
with him and members of his family and those who worked with him in previous
athletic programs."
"While we have not yet made a final decision about whether or not he will
ultimately be allowed to participate in our football program," Stoops
continued, "we believe in looking at the whole character and background of a
person in deciding whether or not he deserves a second chance.  We recognize
that it is only human to make an isolated mistake and the important thing is
whether or not we learn from that mistake.  If we end up deciding that he
will join our football program, we will hold him very strictly to the highest
standards of behavior.  Not a single deviation from that standard will be
tolerated."
That's what the press release said, and, coming from OU, I guess I shouldn't
be that surprised.
McGruder was kicked off the Tennessee team after he was charged with felony
possession of marijuana with the intent to sell and deliver.
The charge said there were marijuana plants, a scale and other things the
police report described as drug-related material in his room.
Tennessee coach Phillip Fulmer sometimes gives scholarships to kids other
schools won't touch.
 Do you remember the offensive lineman a couple of years ago who was charged
with raping a student at Florida while he was on a recruiting visit to the
school? Florida dropped him, but Fulmer signed him.
In other words, when Fulmer boots a kid for character reasons, you know
something is really wrong.
The odd thing about Stoops taking him is that, if convicted, he might do some
serious prison time.
Stoops didn't say whether McGruder is on scholarship, but I think he would
have stressed that he was walking on if that was the case.
I wonder what parents of top recruits will think of Stoops' decision.
Perhaps he can tell them that, if their sons come to Oklahoma and want to buy
some dope, at least they won't have to leave the athletic dorm to get it.
We shouldn't be surprised. After all, the original Sooners were the crooks
who cheated on the land rush back in 1899. They didn't participate in the
rush, but hid out along the way and grabbed choice pieces of property.
That's kind of like the marathon runners who get caught hitching a car ride
part of the way.
Of course those runners get disqualified and don't get the race named after
them they way the Sooners did. Oklahoma is, after all, the Sooner State.

Corrections

* I wrote in a recent newsletter that the University Interscholastic League
(UIL), the governing body for high school sports in Texas, had a rule against
recruits taking paid visits to colleges while they had eligibility remaining.
That rule was repealed five years ago and there is no such rule now.
* I wrote in my last issue that Victor Ike and Ivan Williams ran behind the
first-team line and Cedric Benson ran behind the defensive line. That should
have been the second-team line.

Subscribe To The E-Mail/Fax To Get Year-Round Football
& Recruiting Scoops !
Save Big As
An Internet Subscriber !
Whether you live close to Austin or far away, the True Orange E-Mail/Fax
Service is the way to keep up with Longhorn football and Longhorn recruiting
- instantly. It has about 110 to 120 timely e-mail/faxes a year, primarily
about football and football recruiting.  To  subscribe, send your check to
True Orange, Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755, and copy or clip the coupon
below and fill in the blanks. If you want it mailed, or by E-Mail, just
include the right numbers.

o I'm enclosing $99 for the 99-fax package for the next year
o I'm enclosing $130 (an $11 saving) to renew my subscription to True Orange
and to subscribe to the 99 faxes.
o I'm enclosing $79 for the 99-fax package for the next year by E-Mail (a $20
saving)
o Here's  $110 to renew my subscription to True Orange and to subscribe to
the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $31 saving)
o Here's  $99 to subscribe to True Orange via the Internet  and to subscribe
to the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $42 saving)

Name

Fax No.
(or E-Mail or mailing address)


I think Bonneville is a terminated physical deal.  Regardless, I need an address for them to use to notify Enron Estate of their request.  Do you want to use the same address for both physical and financial contracts?

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dicarlo, Louis
Sent:	Friday, February 15, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Bonneville

The company we discussed is Bonneville Fuels.  I'll provide them with the notification address once you give it to me.

Thanks

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas Structuring
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com


For weeks we've all wondered about that unsightly dirt pile with rebar
sticking up and whether the City would actually do something about it.

Well, I mentioned it last Thursday to Rick Ehrlich, the builder who is
doing that project between Bomar and Peden (and who also did that
terrific renovation of Las  Brisas at Stanford and Fairview).  The next
day he had his crew remove it.  Nice gesture from a local builder  and
neighbor.

Gayle Ramsey

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Pv4pGD/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/NoOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Here is the draft.  Prior to sending to customer, Jay please look at the MAC language and advise is it needs to be reworded.  Also, is this a political sub-division? If so, I will need to add a provision for same.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Cc:	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	Imperial Irrigation District

Debra,

A couple of weeks ago, Jay Williams sent a credit worksheet to you to prepare an Enfolio agreement for Imperial Irrigation District.  I will be forwarding an RFP response to them Friday which is required to include our draft contract.  I haven't received a copy of this draft.  Could you forward this to me at your earliest convenience?

Thanks,

Kim Ward


Shirley,
I will take half day off tomorrow morning, on Friday, in addition to today's
afternoon.

Tanya


Please don't change any deals until we have spoken. I need to talk to John
about how these changes will affect his positions.

Chris


Hi Tom - this would be good as Ken Lay will not be able to attend next week.
He will be out of the country.

Rosalee

"Siekman, Tom" <Tom.Siekman@COMPAQ.com> on 03/15/2001 10:25:53 AM
To: "Capellas, Michael D." <Michael.Capellas@COMPAQ.com>, "Lawrence T. Babbio
Jr. (E-mail)" <babbio@verizon.com>, "Kenneth L. (Ken) Lay (E-mail)"
<klay@enron.com>, "'Sandy.Litvak@Disney.com'" <Sandy.Litvak@Disney.com>,
"Kenneth (Ken) Roman (E-mail)" <ken.roman@verizon.net>, "Lucie Salhany
(E-mail)" <lucie@jhmedia.com>
cc: "Auwers, Linda" <Linda.Auwers@COMPAQ.com>
Subject: Telephonic Board Meeting

Thank you for making yourself available this afternoon. We want to apprise
you of recent developments and our planned responses.  The regular Board
Meeting is scheduled for next week. This may not be required in view of the
discussions we'll have this afternoon.  We'll confirm this afternoon whether
the Board Meeting is required.


-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Salter [mailto:dsalter@hgp-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Herndon, Rogers; Imai, Rika; Will, Lloyd; Presto, Kevin M.; Harry
Aurora; Fletch Sturm; Davis, Mark Dana; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject: Rolling Forecast

Attached are the two files containing this week's Rolling Forecast.

Dan


----- Forwarded by David M Gagliardi/TTG/HouInd on 08/17/01 08:16 AM -----

                    "Gagliardi,
                    Michael"             To:     "'dgagliardi@reliantenergy.com'" <dgagliardi@reliantenergy.com>,
                    <mgagliardi@u        "'tony.a.rogers@fritolay.com'" <tony.a.rogers@fritolay.com>,
                    nocal.com>           "'david.ricks@spotplus.com'" <david.ricks@spotplus.com>
                                         cc:
                    08/17/01             Subject:     FW: True Orange E-Mail/Fax #80
                    06:57 AM

> -----Original Message-----
> From:         TruOrange@aol.com [SMTP:TruOrange@aol.com]
> Sent:         Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:14 PM
> To:           TruOrange@aol.com
> Subject:           True Orange E-Mail/Fax #80
>
> True Orange E-Mail/Fax Service
> Volume 9, E-Mail/Fax #80, Thursday, August 16, 2001
> Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange, P. O. Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755 -
> Phone
> 512-795-8536
>
> Williams, Benson Star as Horns Stress Running Game in First Scrimmage
>
> Sophomore  Ivan Williams, the forgotten man at Texas, and true freshman
> Cedric Benson, the guy everyone can't wait to see, were the offensive
> stars
> of the first Longhorn scrimmage of pre-season football practice Thursday
> afternoon.
> Williams had more opportunities than anyone else and he took advantage of

> them, using his 6-1, 245-pound body to run for three touchdowns, all on
> 1-yard runs, and to gain 78 yards on 10 carries.
> "Ivan really stepped up," said head coach Mack Brown. "he weighs about
245
>
> pounds and he really did a good job for us today. He showed a lot of
power
>
> and determination."
> Benson, the phenom from Midland Lee, had five carries for 37 yards and
> also
> went 25 yards with a swing pass from QB Chris Simms. He made four yards
on
>
> one play that looked like it would be a four-yard loss. He has a great
> combination of speed, power and cutback ability.
> "Cedric  has great quickness and great vision," Brown said. "He's a tough

> kid, too. Rufus Harris (freshman safety) really belted him on one run,
and
> he
> just hopped back up and went back to the huddle like nothing had
happened.
> He
> ran the ball a lot at Midland Lee with everybody keying on him, so he's
> already shown he's a tough runner."
> The coaches stressed the running game in the scrimmage, and Brown said
> that
> was because they had to work primarily on the passing game when they were
> in
> shorts and shells for the first several days of practice and also
because,
>
> "It's important that we have a good running game."
> He said the offense needs to make more time-consuming drives to "help
keep
>
> our defense fresh. We've got to use our offense to help our defense out
by
>
> controlling the clock a little more."
> The right side of the offensive line, with guard Antwan Kirk-Hughes and
> tackle Mike Williams, did a great job of run blocking throughout the
> scrimmage.
> Simms also had a good day passing, hitting 15 of 23 for 142 yards and a
> touchdown on a 16-yard completion to sophomore WR Sloan Thomas, who made
a
>
> great catch just before going out of bounds.
> But this was a day for running backs to shine, and starter Victor ike had
> 28
> yards on just four carries and also had a 37-yard run with a short pass.
> Redshirt freshman Sneezy Beltran had 40 yards on just two carries and
> junior
> Kenny Hayter had five carries for 34 yards.
> Sophomore DB Nathan Vasher had an 82-yard kickoff return for a touchdown.
> Walk-on Mike Ungar had a 46-yard touchdown catch on a long pass from
> redshirt
> freshman QB Chance Mock.
> Senior QB Major Applewhite, working with the second-team offense
primarily
>
> against the first-team defense, competed 5 of 13 passes for 27 yards and
> sophomore safety Dakarai Pearson picked off one and would have run it in
> for
> a touchdown if the officials hadn't blown the play dead. Mock's only
> completion in three attempts was the long TD strike to Ungar.
> JC transfer Brian Bradfort\d, who appears to have nailed down the
starting
>
> punting job, had two punts, with one going 44 yards and the other going
> 43.
> On the down side, however, he did have one blocked.
> Freshman walk-on Dusty Mangum of Mesquite was the starting place kicker
> and
> he was three-for-three on field goals from 32, 46, and 26 yards out.
> The Longhorns will practice at 8:30 a.m. and 7 p.m. Friday at the Denius
> Fields before having a second scrimmage at 9 a.m. Saturday in Royal
> Memorial
> Stadium.
> RECRUITING NOTES: With 12 commitments already, the Longhorns are about
> halfway through recruiting. Look for them to sign 12 to 14 more players,
> with
> most of them coming from a group that includes DT Roderique Wright of
> Alief
> Hastings, WR Marquis Johnson of Champaign, Ill.; DT-OG Kasey Studdard of
> Highlands Ranch, Colo.; RB Albert Hardy of Galena Park, LB Aaron Harris
of
>
> North Mesquite, DE Travis Leitko of The Woodlands, DE Larry Dibbles of
> Lancaster, DT Marco Martin of Mesquite, CB Ricky Wilson of Port Arthur
> Lincoln, DE Chase Pittman of Shreveport Evangel, DE Brian Pickryl of
> Jenks,
> Okla., DE Dontroll Coates of Anahuac, WR Biren Ealy of Cypress Falls, OL
> Justin Blaylock of Plano East, OL Tony Ugoh of Spring Westfield,  OLBs
> Garnett Smith of Arlington Lamar and Glenn Jackson of Carrollton Turner
> and
> CB Donald Burgs of Houston Madison. There are some other guys Texas will
> get,
> too, but these are the ones who are the best bets  now.
> My next e-mail/fax will be whenever events warrant.
> The True Orange E-Mail/Fax Service includes  at  least  99 fax/e-mails  a

> year and costs $99 ($79 by E-Mail). The True Orange Newsletter includes
> 26
> newsletters and is published weekly during football season and twice
> monthly
> during most of the other months. It costs $45. Save by subscribing to
both
>
> for $130 (or $110 if you take the faxes via E-Mail  or $99 if you take
> both
> services via E-Mail). Send check  to address at the top of page. I also
> update my 900 number - 1-900-288-8839 - daily with recruiting news. My
> E-Mail address is: truorange@aol.com.


Just in case you want to join us, Mark, Liz Sager, Shawna and I are going to
sign up for the Guadelupe River rafting tour.  If that's your cup of tea join
us, 'cause it should be fun!


Can you believe it... I was wrong.

Hans Rotman (Fuel Manager at CES, left in 12/99), did a deal with Aristech
last Sept/Oct for Aristech to release the excess capacity to CES in April and
May. John Whited (Fuel Manager at CES, still there) thinks it was release in
CES's name. Like Chris said, we really don't need the capacity. We are short
Hopewell capacity in Market Area 33 on the East Side. This capcity is on the
West Side in Kentucky.

Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chris Germany@ECT
04/03/2000 09:06 AM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Aristech Capacity

Scott Goodell thinks this might be wholesale capacity for April and May.
This is the first time I've heard about this.  I believe Joanie said this
capacity is primary to Op 3 which doesn't do much for us.

I need to know if we have to take this space.  I would prefer not to take the
space if we don't have to.

Joanie will send us an email after she checks with the CES asset management
group.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 08:30
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
04/03/2000 08:29 AM
To: jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com @ ENRON
cc: dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: TCO Capacity

I need to check on this.  I need to make sure we are not paying for this.  If
it turns out to be retail, I will make sure I give CES credit for the
transport.

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/31/2000 08:16:24 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>, " -
*Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>
cc: " - *Kinney, Doug" <BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Dalphon,
Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: TCO Capacity

Just found out that we have acces to 15,000 of Aritech's capacity on TCO for
Apr & May, for $0.01, primary COH 3-15. Can we replace capacity ENA bought for
4/1 and would there be any cost?


You big chicken!  You don't have to be afraid of moi.  I don't bite.  (not
that hard)  You're slackin' on the dirty jokes front, what's up with that?

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Yes, nothing is set in stone.  I really have not discussed the menu with
anybody.  What would you perfer?

Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:

> does it matter
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   John Maliszewski <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 1:58 PM
>    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>
>    Thanks-  Do you like my menu for Christmas?
>
>    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>
>    > will bring you back some cajun chef at Chistmas
>    >
>    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    From:   John Maliszewski <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    Sent:   Monday, November 19, 2001 11:42 AM
>    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >
>    >    I like to make my own chili.  I load it up with beans, Sue uses
>    pork and
>    >    beans(it's O.K.), but I like the beans mom used to use.    I was
>    told I
>    >    needed
>    >    to put a little more kick into my chili, so I figured that I would
>    ask
>    >    the
>    >    best-JOE.
>    >
>    >    Hey, for Christmas, I will provide the Ham and all the
>    >    beer,wine,pop,liquor,
>    >    pie,chips , nuts and bread. I will have Amy make some barbacued
>    weiners.
>    >    I will
>    >    need you to make double baked potatoes. I will have Jean bring the
>    >    polish
>    >    sausage and corn/greenbeans.  I may get some sourerkraut and
>    dumplins
>    >    from
>    >    Stoysich also.  I will tell dad that he can pay for the ham.
>    >    I will have Joey bring a relish trey  and some lasagne.( I thought
>    it
>    >    was
>    >    pretty good)
>    >    Do we need anything else? We are all off on that day, so we can
>    start
>    >    the party
>    >    as early as 3P.M. or earlier if you think, my guess is that you
>    will be
>    >    at the
>    >    casino that morning. Please advise.
>    >
>    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >
>    >    > since when do you cook-Ithought Sue did everything
>    >    >
>    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    From:   "John Maliszewski" <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    >    Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:14 PM
>    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >    >
>    >    >    I need his recipe. We had a chili cookoff and I made my own
>    chili
>    >    and
>    >    >    came in
>    >    >    3rd out of 5 people.  I beat 2 women, but My chili was not
>    spicey
>    >    >    enough.
>    >    >
>    >    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >    >
>    >    >    > Cajun Chef-can only get it here.  Too bad.
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    >    From:   "John Maliszewski" <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    >    >    Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:33 PM
>    >    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    >    Subject:  Re: Thanksgiving
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    You mean the stuff you buy or the gas that comes out of
>    my
>    >    butt
>    >    >    after I
>    >    >    >    make chili.  Speaking of chili, what does Joe put in his
>    to
>    >    spice
>    >    >    it up.
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    Jane.M.Tholt@enron.com wrote:
>    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    > All the gas stocks getting hammered.  Natural gas is
>    >    bursting at
>    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    seams.
>    >    >    >    > Your bill should go way down
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    >    >    >    From:   "John Maliszewski" <jmalisz@qwest.com>@ENRON
>    >    >    >    >    Sent:   Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:19 PM
>    >    >    >    >    To:     Tholt, Jane M.
>    >    >    >    >    Subject:  Thanksgiving
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >    I ordered the pies for our big Thanksgiving day
>    feast at
>    >    >    Jeanies.
>    >    >    >    Wish
>    >    >    >    >    you could be there.  Dad is bringing the beer, he
>    said
>    >    one  12
>    >    >    pack
>    >    >    >    >    would do, I told him to bring a case, just in case
>    >    someone
>    >    >    wants
>    >    >    >    more
>    >    >    >    >    that one can. I know that Joan is not coming to
>    dinner.
>    >    >    Should we
>    >    >    >    >    invite her to Christmas or wait for her to call.
>    If
>    >    you
>    >    >    ever
>    >    >    >    talk to
>    >    >    >    >    her, you may want to mention that her father is
>    still
>    >    alive
>    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    lives in
>    >    >    >    >    the same house that she was raised in.  I hope she
>    comes
>    >    for
>    >    >    >    Christmas.
>    >    >    >    >    If she doesn't, I doubt that I will ever invite to
>    >    anything
>    >    >    again.
>    >    >    >    But
>    >    >    >    >    that is that fucking Links "better that everybody
>    >    >    else"attitude.
>    >    >    >    I
>    >    >    >    >    might just turn that sideways and stick it up his
>    German
>    >    ass.
>    >    >    Hey
>    >    >    >    our
>    >    >    >    >    stock is going up, how bout yours?
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >
>    >
>    **********************************************************************
>    >    >    >    > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
>    >    relevant
>    >    >    >    affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged
>    material
>    >    for
>    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
>    >    >    distribution or
>    >    >    >    disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are
>    not
>    >    the
>    >    >    intended
>    >    >    >    recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
>    please
>    >    >    contact
>    >    >    >    the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
>    >    >    >    enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
>    copies
>    >    of
>    >    >    the
>    >    >    >    message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
>    >    intended
>    >    >    to be
>    >    >    >    an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
>    a
>    >    binding
>    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>    >    affiliates)
>    >    >    and
>    >    >    >    the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
>    >    relied on
>    >    >    by
>    >    >    >    anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>    otherwise.
>    >    Thank
>    >    >    you.
>    >    >    >    >
>    >    >
>    >
>    **********************************************************************


Set up with Eric Salinas 33968 - 10/3/00 jar


----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Hall <dhall@riskwaters.com>
To: <les@lacima.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 8:53 PM
Subject: EPRM

> Dear Mr Clewlow
>
> Thanks for your piece on Var for inclusion in the October edition of
Energy
> & Power
> Risk Management.
>
> The article is attached. There are a few queries from the editor and
myself
> written in bold in the text. You might find that some parts of the piece
> have been edited to
> conform to our 'house style', etc.
>
> Comments and suggestions welcome.
>
> Should we send this article to anybody else for their approval?
>
> Thanks and kind regards,
>
>
> Dave Hall
> Chief Subeditor
> Energy & Power Risk Management magazine
> Risk Waters Group
> Haymarket House
> 28-29 Haymarket
> London
> SW1Y 4RX
> UK
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7484 9796
> Fax: +44 (0)20 7930 2238
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

 - Var.doc


David

I have since our call yesterday spoken to SHELL about clause 4 (particularly
(b)) - we are still struggling to reach agreement.  SHELL are very unwilling
to accept this sub-clause (b).

However, there is a possibility that they will accept a narrower version of
it, modified in such a way as to specify the limited circumstances where the
indemnity would apply (you and I briefly discussed yesterday those
circumstances).  SHELL will only contemplate giving the indemnity where these
circumstances are clearly defined.  Please would you therefore re-draft 4(b)
accordingly.

Incidentally, this is the one remaining issue.

Thanks.
Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 18/10/2000 11:16
---------------------------

Justin Boyd
17/10/2000 16:21
To: gilbergd@sullcrom.com
cc:

Subject: ETA

David

Please could you let me know what losses, liabilities, etc are contemplated
by clause 4(b) of the ETA, as attached.

I am in negotiations with a large trading counterparty who are unwilling to
accept it - and I would like to given them examples of the losses
contemplated.  I am struggling myself!

Many Thanks.
Justin


Chris,

Will this be a problem?
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/08/2000
11:55 AM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
03/08/2000 11:42 AM

To: joann_collins@enron.com
cc: Kara Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Doug
Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Redirection of Coh Gas

Hi Joann.

Effective March 9th - 31st, please redirect 50 dth per day from COH 7-3 to
Penn
Fuel 8-36.  Please advise of the contract number.  Thank you.


1 - Vegas, Florida or Pebble Beach
2 - Business Plan presentations and market overviews of 30 minutes from each BU with an emphasis on obstacles to making budget internal and/or external and opportunities for growth and/or new businesses. I would add discussion topics on, how can we find/keep best talent and what are challenges, Trading track and A&A's, how do we increase collaboration and value creation between ENA (EWS) groups, best forum for exchanging above information on ongoing basis, culture and PULSE results and "complaints" about agressive and stressful environment at ENA, Diversity of team and how can we improve it, coaching and mentoring of Managers and Directors to improve their readiness to become VP's.
3 - Play one afternoon and night of arrival etc.,
4 - Award ceremony for best excuses for not making budgets, worst haircut, most inventive use of a business suit.

Seriously, I would be delighted to set something up. Believe it or not I have a couple of people who can help with planning et al. My suggestion would be to mirror the Lakes offsite we had back last May.

David

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lavorato, John
Sent:	Wednesday, May 02, 2001 4:29 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip; Arnold, John; Arora, Harry; Baughman, Edward D.; Beck, Sally; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher; Collonges, Remi; Colwell, Wes; Davies, Derek; Davis, Mark Dana; Deffner, Joseph; Devries, Glen; Devries, Paul; Duran, W David; Foster, Chris H.; Gilbert-Smith, Doug; Gonzalez, Orlando; Haedicke, Mark; Herndon, Rogers; Jacoby, Ben; Josey, Scott; Kishkill, Joe; Kitagawa, Kyle; Lagrasta, Fred; Lavorato, John; LeDain, Eric; Luce, Laura; Martin, Thomas A.; McKay, Jonathan; Miller, Don; Miller, Michael L.; Milnthorp, Rob; Mrha, Jean; Neal, Scott; Oxley, David; Parquet, David; Perlman, Beth; Presto, Kevin; Redmond, Brian; Shively, Hunter S.; Sturm, Fletcher; Swerzbin, Mike; Thompson, C. John; Tricoli, Carl; Tycholiz, Barry; Vickers, Frank; Wiggs, Brett; Wolfe, Greg; Yzaguirre, Max; Zufferli, John
Cc:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:

Hello everyone.

In December we decided to kill our planned offsite due to market volatility.  Louise and I would like to get everyone together offsite, probably in late June (once Louise is back from holiday (just kidding)).  I think it's time to go have a little fun with the group driving Enron's success.

I would like suggestions as to:

1)  Where to go.

2)  What should be the focus of the business meetings.

3)  Should we have business meetings or should we do something else (ie. climb a mountain)?  I'm not a strong bid on climbing a mountain.

4)  And any other ideas you have.

In addition I would like to start having staff meetings about once a month.  The first one will be Friday May 11th at 2:30 p.m.  Please add this to your schedule.  I have invited everyone who has P/L responsibility.  Portland, Calgary and Toronto will have to be on Video or Phone conference.

Regards

John


********************[ A D V E R T I S E M E N T ]****************
Turn your Nasdaq trash into cash! Dive into the Nasdaq dumpster
and capture 50-100% profits in just a few days. Don't get
left behind! Click here for your FREE special report:
"The Next 5 Monster Stocks of the NewTech Era"
http://www.changewave.com/a/11/sos27
*****************************************************************
SIVY ON STOCKS from money.com
November 29, 2000

Fix your mix

In volatile markets like this one, sectors behave in radically different
ways. Here's what you need to know to find today's best opportunities.

By Michael Sivy

When the economy is purring along, most stock groups rise and fall
together. But amid uncertainty and turmoil, different groups suffer at
different times and rebound with varying delays. That's what's been
happening this year, and investors preparing for 2001 need to examine each
sector independently to find the best bargains and to minimize risk.

Since January, there have been three big divergences in the market. The
first has been between tech stocks and defensive groups. The second has
been between issues with high P/Es and those with low P/Es. And the third
has been between companies with big market capitalizations and those with
small caps.

After many months of leadership, tech stocks peaked in March and have
declined as evidence of an economic slowdown accumulated. Technology
companies began warning that their earnings might fall short in upcoming
quarters, and the entire sector suffered as money managers and individual
investors began reducing their exposure. By Thanksgiving, even the
strongest and most popular tech stocks, including Cisco and Oracle, were
down a third or more from their highs. And even at current levels the
stocks aren't cheap with P/Es as high as 50. They'll be vulnerable to
further declines until it's clear that the economy has completed its
downswing.

By contrast, consumer stocks (which are defensive because they aren't as
tied to economic cycles as tech stocks are) benefited from investors'
flight to safety. After having dropped by a third to less than $60 a share
in March, Procter & Gamble [PG] rebounded 35 percent to $74. And
Anheuser-Bush [BUD] has rallied more than 70 percent over the same period
to $48. Those stocks are now trading at more than 20 times next year's
earnings, so they're no longer exceptionally cheap. But such defensive
issues may still be worth buying to balance a portfolio that has been
overloaded in tech.

Energy stocks have also benefited immensely as a defensive sector, but they
were helped even more by this year's sharp runup in the price of oil.
ExxonMobil [XOM], one of the most conservative international oil companies,
has gained 20 percent since March to $89 a share. I doubt, however, that
oil can remain above $30 a barrel for more than a year or two -- today's
high prices will bring on more supply and an economic slowdown could reduce
demand. As a result, I think energy stocks may have seen the best parts of
their gains.

While constrained supply has pushed up prices in the oil business,
oversupply has done the opposite in telecommunications. Fiercely
competitive phone companies have overbuilt their networks so much that they
have been undercutting each other on pricing and cutting back on further
equipment purchases. The result is that stocks throughout the sector --
from service providers like AT&T [T] and WorldCom [WCOM] to equipment
manufacturers like Lucent [LU] -- have lost more than half their value
since the spring. Statistically, I think stocks in the group are
undervalued by a third, but they still may represent dead money for the
next six months.

These divergences among industry sectors are the most visible symptom of
the roiling market, but they aren't the only one. The largest U.S.
companies have average P/Es in the mid-20s, and the most popular giants
have P/Es double or nearly triple historical levels. By contrast, small
companies -- those with market caps of less than $3.5 billion -- have
average P/Es of below 18.

 From all these cross-currents, two important ideas emerge. At any point
there's likely to be at least one sector that's deeply undervalued. Don't
try to predict the turns -- just buy one or two of the blue chips in the
sector that looks cheapest. Right now, defensive stocks are still in an
uptrend but they're no longer cheap, while the techs are still falling
(their decline isn't over yet). You can either buy good tech values and
ride out any further decline or wait until they look fully washed out. The
other important idea is that high-P/E blue-chip growth stocks are way
overvalued compared with everything else. Of course, those are the stocks
everyone most wants to own. But be smart -- diversify with a value fund or
a fund that holds mid- and small-caps with an average P/E below 20. They're
out there.

###

Post your comments on Michael's column at:
http://www.money.com/depts/investing/sivy/index.html

To subscribe or unsubscribe to Sivy on Stocks, go to:
http://www.money.com/email/

Earning Releases and Calls
For the latest corporate earnings releases and online conference
calls click on: http://money.ccbn.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Special Internet Offer!!!

Sign up for a RISK-FREE issue of MONEY MAGAZINE at
http://www.money.com/subscribe2

Or if you prefer call our toll-free number 1-800-544-4594

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

We may, from time to time, contact you with offers for Time Inc.
products and services which we think may be of interest to you.
If you would prefer us not to contact you in this manner, AND
YOU DID NOT INDICATE THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP
for the Sivy on Stocks online newsletter or any other Time Inc.
online newsletters, please let us know by sending us an e-mail
at <no_solicit@money.com>.

Additionally, from time to time we may provide your e-mail
address to carefully chosen companies whose offers we think may
be of interest to you.  If you would prefer us not use your
e-mail address in this manner, AND YOU DID NOT INDICATE
THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP for the Sivy on Stocks online
newsletter or any other Time Inc. online newsletter, please let
us know by e-mailing us at <no_transfer@money.com>.


I have not used table edit in over 2 years, I really don't think I am a candidate to test it.  I have told someone this already when asked a couple of weeks ago.  I also am very involved in testing the Preschedule workspace and Path confirmation, and don't want anything to get in the way of that.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pate, Brett
Sent:	Monday, July 09, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Bentley, Corry; Semperger, Cara
Cc:	Martin, Karen Y
Subject:	User Testing - Stage - Table Edit
Importance:	High

Corry, Cara,

There is a new version of Table Edit in Stage, ver. 1.0.0.33, which Counterparty Extensions and Aliases have been added to it.  Bill informed me that you two were the best candidates to look at this for user testing.  Please let me know how it looks, and if you have any questions.  Be sure to verify the version number.

Thanks,

Brett Pate
Enpower QA

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crooks, William
Sent:	Monday, July 09, 2001 12:35 PM
To:	Martin, Karen Y; Pate, Brett
Subject:	FW: New Version of Table Edit

QA:

	Let's move this to Stage and then contact Melissa regarding the Legal Entity Rule tab (she's best to test that.)  Corry and Cara can test the Couterparty Extensions & Aliases - just let them know that this is critical to Preschedule Workspace.

Regards,
Bill x53492

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Venkataswami, Vishwanatha
Sent:	Monday, July 09, 2001 12:24 PM
To:	Pate, Brett; Martin, Karen Y
Cc:	Smith, Will; Luu, Duong; Crooks, William
Subject:	New Version of Table Edit

QA Team,

New Version of Tabledit.Exe 1.0.0.33 is moved to P:\PowerSys\Stage. Following tabs are added to this
?	Counterparty Extensions & Aliases
?	Legal Entity Rule

If you have any questions please do let me know,

Thanks,
Vish
X 53209


FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: rlstone@bpa.gov [mailto:rlstone@bpa.gov]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 9:22 AM
To: OASISPOSTINGS-L@LIST.TRANSMISSION.BPA.GOV
Subject: OASIS Posting - Redispatch and Curtailment Procedures Final

Please click on the attached icon or the Web address below to go to the most recent OASIS Posting.

If that doesn't work highlight and copy the address below, then paste it into the address line of your Web browser and hit "enter":

Information on BPAT's implementation of tariff terms and conditions and/or transmission marketing policy has been posted to:

http://www.transmission.bpa.gov/oasis/bpat/BusPractices/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=17&threadid=94.doc

For questions or comments, please contact your Transmission Account Executive.


Bob's number is:  617.567.8877.  It's his home number.  Feel free to call him there.

Best,
Jeff


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041602.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


please call.  I'd like copy of final Media General.  Also, we need to discuss
the notice.  sara


Can you join me at this meeting?  I plan to talk with Tom Gros tomorrow to
let him know that you will be the liasion with CommodityLogic for Energy
Operations.  Then I thought that we could both attend this next meeting as a
transition.  Then it's on your calendar after that !  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000 05:29 PM
---------------------------

08/14/2000 03:13 PM
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
08/14/2000 03:13 PM
08/14/2000 03:13 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simon
Sear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Norden/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Schomer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, John P
Tollefsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Ballengee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrew
Cole/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brad Romine/NA/Enron@Enron, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Xochil Moreno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Yolanda Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Graves/Corp/Enron@Enron, Terry Furches/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: CommodityLogic Team Mtg. 8/16

REMINDER :

Our weekly CommodityLogic Team meeting will be held in EB 21C2 on Wednesday,
August 16th. from 10am - 11am. If you have any questions or will be UNABLE to
attend, please feel free to send me an e-mail or call me.

Thanks,
Brenda
x31914


Well, I goofed up the email again.

The dates we are reducing noms for are 3/14 and 3/15.

I'll call on Wednesday AM about Thursday numbers.


This message is to confirm your EOL transaction with Transwestern Pipeline Company.
You have successfully acquired the package(s) listed below.  If you have questions or
concerns regarding the transaction(s), please call Craig Buehler at (713)853-6964
prior to placing your nominations for these volumes.

US Pipeline Capacity TW(Firm)

Transaction No:  60989
Product Name:    LaMaquina-I/B Link
Time Stamp:      Sep 24 2001  2:20 pm
TW Request#:     27635

Shipper Name:    Burlington Resources Trading, Inc.
TW Contract#:    27713

Volume:          15,000 Dth/d

Rate:            $0.0500/d 1-part(Combined Reservation & Commodity) 100% Load Factor
                 + applicable fuel and unaccounted for

Term:            10/01/2001 through 10/31/01

Primary Points:         RP
                 500539 WFS LA MAQUINA PLANT I/C

                        DP
                 500545 I/B LINK

Alternate Points: 	    RP
                 500535 WFS IGNACIO

                         DP
                 500540 EPNG/BLANCO

Contact:         Craig Buehler Phone  (713)853-6964
                               Fax    (713)646-8085
                               Email  craig.buehler@enron.com


PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU ARE COMPLETELY PACKED BY 3:00 PM.  THE MOVE TEAM WILL BE ON THE FLOOR BY 3:00 PM.

ALSO:

1. EMPTY VOICEMAIL
2. TAKE HOME LAPTOPS AND PALM PILOTS, IPAQ'S OR BLACKBERRY'S
3. TO BE HERE AT LEAST ONE HOUR PRIOR TO YOUR NORMAL TIME ON MONDAY MORNING.  THE FLOOR WILL BE OPEN BY 5:00 AM
4.  PACK HEADSETS. (BOX,  BLACK WIRE TO EARPIECE AND BLACK CORD THAT CONNECTS UNDER DESK) ONLY LEAVE GRAY WIRES

LET ME KNOW IF THERE IS ANY QUESTIONS  OR IF YOU NEED ANY HELP
Ina Rangel
Administrative Coordinator
Enron North America
713-853-7257 Voice
713-646-3604 Fax


Sounds good.   We may want to consider diesel installation for Lincoln Electric as well.

I am beginning to think that diesel installations is our primary solution to cover OPPD short for May-Oct 02.


Boy did I flake on the happy hour.  Jeff-I think I've
gone over THE edge.  Hectic does't even work anymore.
I'm on a (fairly)good project at HP..IN SACRAMENTO,
in fact 20 miles north of Sacramento. I LOVE the
company, the learning, the work, the teams, the
people, the career opportunities.  I hate the 4+ hours
of driving on Mondays and Tuesdays, strategizing(real
word?) about balancing the needs of the team with
getting my ass to school. I really want to talk to
you...I'm thinking about full time and want your
thoughts.  Are you available at break on Tuesday for a
beer?
Courtney
--- Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
> Hey there stranger:
> By the looks of your attire (very nice), and the
> pace of you walk the other
> night, looks like you're back in the working groove.
>  Hope work is fun and
> your classes are good.  I'm trying to get used to
> the "no life" thing
> again.  And you slacked on the happy hour.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/


Please read the attached comments regarding the physical contracts.

Teresa G. Bushman
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3835A
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7895
fax (713) 646-3393
teresa.g.bushman@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 12:32 PM -----

	rainj@tklaw.com
	12/19/2000 11:16 AM

		 To: nora.dobin@enron.com, Tim.Proffitt@enron.com, Chris.Herron@enron.com,
Stanley.Farmer@enron.com, Kevin.Liss@enron.com, Teresa.G.Bushman@enron.com,
mary.cook@enron.com
		 cc: shearerr@tklaw.com, hardiet@tklaw.com
		 Subject: Brazos VPP - Open issues

Tax Issues

I have spoken with my tax partner, T. Hardie, about a couple of issues.
First is whether we should increase the general partner's share from .0001%
to .0025% in order to reduce a possible risk that Brazos VPP Limited
Partnership might somehow not be treated as a partnership for tax purposes.
T. does not feel strongly about this (in part because the consequences
should not be adverse) and, unless Kevin desires otherwise, I think we
should leave the percentage at .0001%.  (Any tax law with respect to the
minimum .0025% level is probably obsolete now that we have "check-the-box"
elections for tax treatment as a partnership.)  Nora advises me that Stan
is fine with this from an accounting perspective.

The second tax issue is whether Agave, as depositor under the Trust
Agreement, can be tax matters partner for the Trust (which will also elect
to be taxed as a partnership).  Since only a partner can be tax matters
partner, it appears that one of the Class B Certificateholders -- i.e.,
Bank of America -- must be the tax matters partner.  The Servicer can of
course assist with preparation of income tax filings.

Balancing Agreement

Attached below is a revised Balancing Agreement, with the changes discussed
on Monday night by Nora, Tim, Teresa, Bob and me.  The principal change is
to add an indemnity section to this Agreement in place of the indemnity we
want to delete from the Participation Agreement that Bracewell Patterson
has prepared.  This indemnity is based on the Term Sheet and is
considerably narrower, but since we did not discuss it specifically, please
review it carefully.  Please pay attention to the note following the
definition of "Servicer Fee" that suggests that the LIBOR breakage costs
and capital adequacy costs be moved to the new indemnity section.  Nora and
I think that this would be more appealing to the Banks, but Stan may prefer
to have this built into the Servicing Fee.

(See attached file: Balancing Agreement Ver 5 from 4.doc)

Physical Sales Contracts

One of our biggest challenges to a quick closing is getting everyone to
agree on some important features of the master gas and oil purchase/sale
agreements.  The term sheet given to the Banks says the following:

     A.   With respect to each Production Payment under which Brazos
     expects to receive deliveries of natural gas in kind, Brazos shall
     enter into a confirmation under the NGPSA with ENA whereby ENA or ERAC
     shall (1) purchase all gas or oil delivered to the Company in kind
     under such Production Payment and (2) pay floating prices for such gas
     or oil.  The floating prices will be swapped into pre-determined fixed
     prices via an Energy Price Swap Agreement.

     B.   Brazos will dedicate to ENA or ERAC all Production Payment gas or
     oil which is delivered under the Production Payments documents.

     C.   The quantities of gas or oil purchased each month shall consist
     of all gas or oilactually delivered in kind to Brazos during such
     month under the Production Payment.  ENA and ERAC will be notified
     monthly in advance of the amount of gas or oil expected to be
     delivered at each delivery point.

     D.   If the actual quantity of Production Payment hydrocarbons
     delivered to Brazos is less than the scheduled quantity of
     hydrocarbons to be delivered (the "Scheduled Volumes"), and the
     producer has not delivered adjustment quantities of Production Payment
     hydrocarbons to satisfy such deficiency, the Servicer (i.e., Agave,
     the new Enron subsidiary guaranteed by Enron Corp.) will make a
     mandatory advance equal to the value of such deficiency at the
     applicable ENA or ERAC price.

     E.   As consideration for the mandatory advance, Brazos will assign to
     the Servicer the right to receive the Adjustment Quantities (or cash)
     that Brazos is entitled to receive under the Production Payment
     documents related to such delivery under the Production Payment.

In analyzing the physical contracts, and all other components of this deal,
it is important to remember that one purpose of the deal is to lock in, for
at least the 97% debt component of the total financing, a cash flow stream
that amortizes the debt over the entire term of each Production Payment.
The pieces of the deal -- the oil and gas accruing to the Production
Payment, the physical sales contracts, and the swaps -- have to fit
together for the entire life of each Production Payment.

It is also important to remember that if there is a mismatch in cash flows,
it will most likely be made up by payments from Enron Corp. under its
guaranty of Agave's mandatory "balancing" advances.  So it behooves Enron,
as well as the Banks, to make sure that the pieces of the deal fit
together.

It therefore seems to me that the physical contracts need to have the
following features:

1.   the physical contracts need to cover all of the production accruing to
each Production Payment during the life of that Production Payment,
including both scheduled quantities and adjustment quantities.  Therefore
there can be no minimum or maximum limits on quantities taken, and the
right to terminate the physical contracts must be limited to a real
melt-down situation.  It is probably misleading to talk about the scheduled
amounts being on a firm basis.

2.   the physical contracts need to match the commodity price swaps that
ENA will be providing for the scheduled amounts of production, with
floating prices for these scheduled amounts that are identical to the
floating swap prices.  Therefore the Contract Prices for the scheduled
amounts of gas need to key off of Inside FERC and the Contract Prices for
the scheduled amounts of oil need to key off of NYMEX WTI, in each case
with any agreed basis differentials.

3.   the physical contracts need to price the adjustment quantities in a
way that causes the adjustment quantities to generate enough cash to repay
Agave/Enron for any mandatory balancing advances.  The way to do this is to
price any deliveries in excess of the scheduled amounts at the Index Prices
contained in the production payment conveyances.  The Index Prices for gas
in the two existing deals are Gas Daily prices and for oil are NYMEX WTI
less differentials.

4.   the physical contracts need to match the timing of the conveyances for
adjustment quantities.  This is daily for gas deliveries and monthly for
oil deliveries.

5.   the physical contracts need to have a cover formula that protects both
ENA/ERAC and Agave/Enron.  The present formula in the Enfolio contract says
that ENA pays the Contract Price for the scheduled quantities that are
delivered and that Brazos pays the product of the shortfall in scheduled
quantities times the positive remainder, if any, of the Index Price minus
the Contract Price.  We need to change this last feature to say that Brazos
pays this remainder, if positive, but that Brazos also gets a credit is
this remainder is negative.  Tim Proffitt can explain the math to anyone
that wants to understand it, but the basic idea is that if there is a
shortfall, Brazos buys gas from ENA at the Index Price to cover the
shortfall and then ENA pays the Contract Price for the full scheduled
amount.

6.   the contracts need to do away with any concept of frequent trading
over the phone.  Each Production Payment should generate only one written
confirmation.

7.   the contracts need to be clear that netting occurs over all
transactions.  This should protect ENA and ERAC against Brazos owing them
money for one Production Payment where production has substantially shut
down and not having the ability to pay.

In light of the above, we also need to consider whether we are better off
starting with the modern Enfolio form that is designed for true commercial
transactions or whether it makes more sense to add the points described
above to the old Cactus form.

John W. Rain
Thompson & Knight L.L.P.
1700 Pacific Ave.
Dallas, Texas 75201
Phone: 214.969.1644 (Dallas)
Phone: 713.653.8887 (Houston)
Fax:       214.880.3150

This email and any attachments to it may contain legally privileged
information or confidential information, which are not intended to be
disclosed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please do
not read or print any attachments or forward or copy this email or any
attachments.  Instead, please permanently delete this email and any
attachments and notify the sender of his mistake.  Thank you very much.

 - Balancing Agreement Ver 5 from 4.doc


Deal # 126281 has been revised from 3,800 to 3,400/d at meter # 6296.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 01:59 PM ---------------------------

Suzanne_Saldivar@eogresources.com on 03/29/2001 11:12:01 AM
To:	rcotten@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Revised HPLC Purchase Estimates - April 2001

Bob:

We have just been advised by EPGT (El Paso) that they will be processing
the  S.G. Marshall gas April 2001; therefore, EOGR will have to reduce the
volume that will be available for sale to HPL.  The new estimate is 3,400
mmbtu/day.

Thanks.

Suzanne
713-651-6858


Gary,

I seem to have the wrong email address - please forward this on.  thx, cooper

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richey, Cooper
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:52 AM
To:	'smcdonald@epcor.ca'
Subject:	FW: job opportunity

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richey, Cooper
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:51 AM
To:	'smacdonald@epcor.ca'
Subject:	job opportunity

Hi,

I work at Enron as a power trader and Gary Hagerty asked me to forward any prospects for a "junior power risk management" position at Epcor onto you.

Michael Wong worked for us on booking the Sundance B PPA position and was let go soon after this was sold to TransCanada/Altagas and if you're still looking for someone, he would be worth investigating.

Regards,
Cooper Richey

Michael Wong
mfwong@ualberta.net
403.560.0289


Found it.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000 07:17
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
09/11/2000 07:23 AM
To: Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Steve Photo's

I have Steve and Lisa on the internet at this web address

http://www.cartogra.com/home/home.asp

Enter the account name "trogg522" in the box on the bottom right.


Great.  I am getting back early around 4.30.  We will meet you at 6.30 even if  John is late we can have wine and catch up.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Enclosed is advice I have received from Bermuda counsel regarding perfecting
an interest in cash collateral.

Susan,
Please put this in your opinion database.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2001 10:41 AM -----

	"Chris Garrod" <CGGarrod@cdp.bm>
	04/18/2001 09:50 AM

		 To: <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc: <Brent.Hendry@enron.com>, <Caroline.Abramo@enron.com>,
<Paul.Radous@enron.com>, <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 Subject: Re: Cash Collateral

Dear Carol

Under Bermuda law, there is no real concept of "perfecting" security since it
is not necessary to ensure the enforceability in Bermuda that a charge be
registered in Bermuda.  However, although it is not necessary for a security
interest to be registered in order for it to be valid, the charge document
itself can be registered in Bermuda in the Register of Charges in accordance
with Section 55 of the Companies Act 1981 in order to ensure the priority in
Bermuda of the charge.  On registration, any charge evidenced in the charging
document will have priority over any unregistered competing charge or any
subsequently registered competing charge in respect of the assets which are
the subject of the charge (i.e. the cash).

If the agreement will be governed by either Texas or New York law, it will be
a matter of the laws of either Texas or New York as to the actual nature of
the security interest which is created by the charge.

If you would like us to effect the registration of the charge, we would need
an original (or a certified true copy) of the executed document which creates
the security interest.  There is no time limit on such registration.
However, please note that, in addition to our professional fees, there is a
filing fee of $446 which is payable in respect of the registration.

I trust that the above is of some assistance.  If you have any questions
please do not hesitate to contact me.

Kind regards.

Chris Garrod

Christopher Garrod
Conyers Dill & Pearman
Clarendon House, 2 Church Street
Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda
Direct dial  441 299 4923
Fax:  441 292 4720
email  cggarrod@cdp.bm

>>> <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com> 04/17/01 06:54PM >>>
Christopher:
We have done a trade with a Bermuda hedge fund and have negotiated
collateral provisions that may require them to post csah to us.  The
agreement will be governed by either Texas or New York law.  We need your
advice on how to perfect our interest in any cash posted to us that we
would hold in an account in the United States.  Could you please call
either me or Sara Shackelton (713)853-5620 if possible tomorrow or you can
send me an e-mail if that is easier.  I'm hoping that our possession of the
cash is enough.  Sorry for the short fuse on this.  If you need any
additional information, please contact me or Sara.  I will be unavailable
from 9-11 and 2-3 tomorrow Houston time.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Count me in on the game.  I will love watching the Trail Gangsters mop up the
Lakers.

What are your plans for the weekend?

Rick

--- Mark.Guzman@enron.com
> wrote:
>
>Thats cool dude.  Sorry we missed you too.  We had a fun time on Saturday
>night.  Friday i took my sister to the blazer game.  She had a really good
>time.  Anyway, I have a 200 level seat behind the basket for game three of
>the playoffs do you want to go?  It is a $76 ticket.  I may be able to get
>game 4 (if neccesary) also if you are interested.  Let me know. It should
>be either the 25th or 26th.

_____________________________________________________________
http://www.osubeavers.com - The Official Athletic Site of Oregon State
Beaver Fans! Get your FREE email at --> http://mail.osubeavers.com!


Start Date: 4/11/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041121.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 21 / Preferred:   2.30 / Final:   2.29)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/11/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


I said you cant just take away the dinner offer.  I wanted to go to dinner
but if you thought it was going to be a big issue between you and Dave I
didn't want to cause a fight between you two or something.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jason (Trading)
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:34 PM
To:	Mills, Bruce
Subject:	FW: Highlights from ENE Analyst Conference Call 11/14

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tucker, Patrick
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Pollan, Sylvia S.; Culotta, Lindsay; Murrell, Russell E; Plachy, Denver; Cuilla, Martin; Storey, Geoff; Yawapongsiri, Virawan; Mahmassani, Souad; Donohoe, Tom; Ruscitti, Kevin; Shively, Hunter S.; Lewis, Andrew H.; Giron, Darron C.; Frihart, Bryant; Roberts, Linda; Luce, Laura; Hogan, Irena D.; Vickers, Frank; Williams, Jason (Trading); Mims, Patrice L.; Simpson, James; Hodge, John; Keavey, Peter F.; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Pereira, Susan W.; Pimenov, Vladi; Ring, Andrea; Savvas, Leonidas; Townsend, Judy; Versen, Victoria; Barbe, Robin; Concannon, Ruth; Goodell, Scott; Jones, David; Kaiser, Jared; Loving, Scott; Bates, Kimberly; Muhl, Gil; Smith, Maureen; Smith, Shauywn; Taylor, Craig; Willis, Jim; Tucker, Patrick; McCaffrey, Deirdre; Penman, Gregg; Kinsey, Lisa; Brady, Kevin; Pendergrass, Cora
Subject:	Highlights from ENE Analyst Conference Call 11/14

Here are my notes from today's call.  As with Monday, I've focused on getting them out as quickly as possible rather than taking extra time to re-organize them by subject.

Enron's business has been grouped into three buckets:  Core, Non-core, and Under Review.
Core:  Wholesale energy business in North America and Europe, retail energy, pipelines
Non-core:  Broadband, water, and international assets (i.e. EGAS).  Enron has approx. $8Bn in investments in these assets, and they have produced 'dismal' returns.  Enron will be exiting these businesses and will attempt to wind them up in an orderly fashion.  An aggressive divestiture program has been set in motion for these assets.
Under Review:  EGM, EIM.  These businesses are being closely examined to determine whether they have a reasonable chance of long-term viability.  Required resource levels are being carefully studied.  Following review, Enron will move the different portions of these businesses to core or non-core as the analysis dictates.
Approximately $800MM of asset sales are under contract and expected to close in the fourth quarter.  These include a gas LDC in Brazil, EcoElectrica, and our Indian E&P assets.
Enron is in active pursuit of an additional private equity infusion of $500MM-1Bn.  Given the current environment, raising equity in the public markets would be 'inefficient', McMahon says.
Short-term liquidity is provided by the $3Bn of credit drawn upon a few weeks ago, the $1Bn of new debt, and the $1.5Bn equity infusion from Dynegy.  Longer-term, the proceeds from the sale of PGE will provide liquidity.  Asset sales over the next year will be used to pay down debt.
McMahon described the major off-balance-sheet vehicles:
Marlin was set up to hold Azurix assets.  It was initially capitalized with $950MM of 144a debt and $125MM of equity (raised from Enron and institutional investors).  The debt is supported by the equity and by Azurix' assets.  Enron is obligated to cover any deficit at the time the debt becomes due on 3/17/03 (the 'Enron topup' obligation).  The 3/17/03 date is accelerated in the event that Enron is rated below-investment-grade by any one of the three major agencies.  The primary asset of Marlin is Wessex Water.  As long as Wessex is worth at least $2.6Bn, there will be no Enron topup required.  If we take a 25% haircut to present book value, Enron will have to provide $650MM in consideration upon retirement of the debt.  This $650MM would hit Enron cash, income, and equity balances.
Osprey contains energy-related assets and 'other assets'.  It was initially capitalized with $2.4Bn of 144a debt and $220MM in equity (ENE and institutionals).  As with Marlin, the entity is an asset-backed structure with an Enron topup guarantee. The debt is supported by a) the assets; b) $1Bn of convertible preferred ENE (convertible into 50MM shares of ENE common); and c) additional ENE common as needed for topup.  Assuming the same 25% hypothetical haircut to current book value, Enron would have to deliver approx. $600MM of topup funds--which would hit ENE cash, income, and equity.  The debt must be retired by 9/17/02, with the same cut-to-junk early trigger provision as Marlin.
Yosemite and the Credit-Linked Notes are predominantly commodity transactions entered into with 'large financial institutions'.  The underlying transactions are already on Enron's balance sheet.  McMahon says that there is no Enron share obligation related to these instruments.
Dynegy has reviewed all of these vehicles, McMahon says.
Our 10Q will be filed five days late.  The 10Q will include all of this detail regarding the off-balance-sheet vehicles.
The special committee investigation is still ongoing.  The committee meets 2-3 times/week, sometimes more often.  The outside auditors (D&T) and external counsel hired by the committee are working 'virtually 7 days a week'.  Lay estimates that it will take the committee several more weeks to complete its investigation.
McMahon says it's 'way too early to tell' if any asset writedowns are called for.  That analysis is underway, but it will not be complete for some time.
Osprey contains the European power projects (Trakya and Saarlux), some North American merchant investments, and some Brazilian assets.
Under the merger agreement, Enron cannot dispose of assets representing more than 15% of the balance sheet without Dynegy approval.  However, an appendix to the agreement holds a list of assets that are specifically permitted to be sold without Dynegy approval.
Broadband is expected to be fully wound up 'sometime over the course of the next year'.  (Did not catch this part clearly).
The ENE topup obligation for Marlin (represented by ENE common that would have to be delivered) will be converted into an obligation for an equivalent amount of DYN shares upon closing.
$1.9Bn of debt is carried at the Azurix level.
Current book value of the Osprey assets is $2.1Bn.
No Dynegy outs other than the previously discussed general MAC clause and the $3.5Bn legal liability clause.
Yosemite and the Credit-Linked notes are functionally equivalent to ENE senior unsecured debt (this section somewhat unclear).  The underlying transactions represented volumes of 'crude oil and gas'.  The transactions relate to the 'physical movement' of these commodities.  The swaps related to Yosemite and the CLNs would be financially settled.
Whalley was asked about the return of trading business to normal volumes.  He said that he cannot yet give an update on the progress of customers returning to our longer-term products.  Acknowledges that a few anxious customers put long-term deals on hold last week.  Says that our first focus is on getting our short-term business back up to normal levels.  It will be 'a couple of weeks' before we're able to give an update on the comfort levels of our customers regarding long-term deals with us.
McMahon:  There hasn't been a major relaxation of credit requirements by our customers--credit requirements continue to follow strict contractual provisions as called for in our individual agreements with our various customers.  But 'we have seen a return of some of the transactions, some of the flows.'
Whalley says that we're hoping to see a return to more normal trading levels late this week or early next week.
Lay says that cost cuts will be made across of all of our businesses.  The situation gives us an opportunity to review our entire cost structure, he says.  The cuts will certainly be deeper in our non-core businesses.  Whalley then quickly interjects (some might say interrrupts) with a clarification that there are no plans to reduce the size of our North American energy trading business.  We will be looking at, perhaps, streamlining some of our processes and making prudent adjustments, but there are no plans to reduce the size of the business.
McMahon:  "The company is overlevered; that's a fact."--hence our pursuit of additional equity.
McMahon mentions that business was better at the start of this week than at the end of last week.
ENE had approx. $1Bn in cash as of 9/30, which McMahon points out would be unusual for us.

As before, give me a call at 3-3055 if you'd like more color.

Patrick Tucker


cool.  sorry i couldn't be of more help.  it's meltdown in the land of fruits
and nuts.

	Susan Scott
	10/12/2000 03:00 PM

		 To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Help, Help!

My hero!

Jeffery Fawcett
10/12/2000 02:59 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Help, Help!

As usual, help was only a phone call [to Jeff Dasovich] away.  You 'da man.
I went to the site and found (via reference links) the stats I needed.
Thanks.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 10/12/2000 11:51 AM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Help, Help!

hmm.  that makes it tougher.  it's crisis central today.  for quick answers
try the ISO website (caiso.com).  i think you can find all that you need. if
not get back to me.

	Jeffery Fawcett
	10/12/2000 10:56 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Help, Help!

yesteday (he says sheepishly)

From: Jeff Dasovich on 10/12/2000 09:34 AM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Help, Help!

I can help, but what's your timing?


Phillip, Scott, Hunter, Tom and John -

Just to reiterate the new trading guidelines on PG&E Energy Trading:

1.  Both financial and physical trading are approved, with a maximum tenor of
18 months

2.  Approved entities are: PG&E Energy Trading - Gas Corporation
    PG&E Energy Trading - Canada Corporation

    NO OTHER PG&E ENTITIES ARE APPROVED FOR TRADING

3.  Both EOL and OTC transactions are OK

4.  Please call Credit (ext. 31803) with details on every OTC transaction.
We need to track all new positions with PG&E Energy Trading on an ongoing
basis.  Please ask the traders and originators on your desks to notify us
with the details on any new transactions immediately upon execution.  For
large transactions (greater than 2 contracts/day or 5 BCF total), please call
for approval before transacting.

Thanks for your assistance; please call me (ext. 53923) or Russell Diamond
(ext. 57095) if you have any questions.

Jay


FYI---I got this same message three different times.


Just imagine a big smiley face with a tongue sticking out right here

====>

Crystal Hyde
05/10/2000 03:26 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Transport P&L

Colleen,

I'll get that info to you as soon as Chris Germany finishes revamping the
East demand worksheets.

Thanks,
Crystal
---------------------- Forwarded by Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2000 03:25
PM ---------------------------
From: Colleen Sullivan on 05/10/2000 11:12 AM
To: Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Transport P&L

No need to give it to me without that info--just get me a copy once you've
reconstructed the spreadsheets.

Crystal Hyde
05/10/2000 10:28 AM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transport P&L

Colleen,

I am unable to complete the Transport P&L for the Northeast Desk due to
reconstruction on the spreadsheets where I gather my demand
charges/reimbursements data. If you would like me to do the Transport P&L
without that info, just let me know and I'll get that to you as soon as
possible.

Thanks,
Crystal Hyde
x57591


My understanding (as of yesterday evening) is that it's on its own.  I'll
check and get back to you.

Best,
Jeff

	Jennifer Rudolph@EES
	04/03/2001 07:35 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Priority Legislation

Jeff---
I am confused.
I thought the SDG&E rate freeze was now wrapped up with 3 other pieces of
legislation in ABX 8?
Now, I see it below....still as the Alpert bill....SBX 43.

Please give me the low-down.
Thank you.
---Jennifer
713-345-8206

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 04/02/2001 06:56 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon
Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James Wright/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda
Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, wgang@enron.com, Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>,
Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com> @ ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, gfergus@brobeck.com, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate,
Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Priority Legislation

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 06:55 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	04/02/2001 06:13 PM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe
<Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton <Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean
<Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne <kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden
<beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw <bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett
<carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>,
Dennis Benevides <dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black
<don.black@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com" <dblack@enron.com>,
"emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>, "ehughes2@enron.com"
<ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com" <gweiss@enron.com>,
"gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>, "Harry.Kingerski@enron.com"
<Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com" <kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike
D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com" <sgahn@enron.com>,
"vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com" <wcurry@enron.com>,
"William.S.Bradford@enron.com" <William.S.Bradford@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner
<Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, John Neslage <john.neslage@enron.com>, Ken Smith
<ken@kdscommunications.com>, Bob Frank <bfrank@enron.com>, Jennifer Thome
<Jennifer.Thome@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Priority Legislation

Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg has circulated the following list of
priority bills which he would like to pass out of the Assembly this
week:

SBX 5 (Sher) - This bill provides a total of $1, 039,500,000 from the
General Fund to implement energy efficiency programs and supplement
existing energy efficiency programs.

SBX 43 (Alpert) - This bill extends the SDG&E rate freeze to users over
100kw.

ABX 29 (Kehoe) - This bill This bill creates a variety of new programs
relating to energy
efficiency and distributed generation.

SBX 6 (Burton) - This bill creates the California Consumer Power and
Conservation Financing Authority (CPCFA), (2) authorizes the issuance of
bonds up to $5 billion, and (3) specifies that the CPCFA shall not
undertake any new projects after January 1, 2007.

SBX 28 (Sher)   This bill contains a series of provisions intended to
accommodate increased construction and operation of power plants.  The
bill also provides a 10-year waiver of standby charges for specified
distributed generation (DG) installations.


Attached are some analyses showing the differential  between the TradersNews
hourly and daily indexes for Cinergy, August-November,  2000, and last week's
power and nat gas futures prices.
?
To sign up for a free 30-day trial of our hourly,  daily and term indexes,
log on to www.tradersnewspower.com, and click  on one of the indexes.?We post
our hourly indexes at about 9:30 a.m. CPT  each weekday; our daily and term
indexes are posted by 3:45 p.m.  CPT.
?
If you've questions or feedback, feel free to  contact us.
?
Thanks--
Bobette
?
Bobette Riner
Senior Power Markets  Analyst
TradersNews
713/647-8690
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
?
Ellen R. Clardy, Ph.D.
Power Markets Analyst
713/647-6603
ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com
?
Suzanna Strangmeier
Power Markets Analyst
713/647-7325
suzanna.strangmeier@ipgdirect.com
?
?
?
 - 120800 week comp.doc
 - TNP index info for Day of Trader.doc
 - Cin 0800-1100 differentials.xls


-----Original Message-----
From: Reuter, Marisa [mailto:MReuter@KSLAW.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:54 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Carnahan, Kathleen; McRae, Janis; Keffer, John
Subject: ENA/Blue Dog: Execution Sets
Importance: High

Kay:

I am attaching execution sets of the following documents:

	1.  Assignment and Assumption Agreement;
	2. ENA Promissory Note;
	3. Amended and Restated LLC Agreement;
	4.  Certificate of Amendment; and

	5. ENA Closing Certificate.
Please have an authorized representative execute 4 originals of every
document, except for the Note where only 1 original is needed. In addition,
please courier all originals to my attention so that all Closing documents
remain in one place. Thanks.

Best regards,

Marisa
 <<Assignmentand AssumptionAgreement.DOC>>  <<PromissoryNote.DOC>>

 <<LLC Agreement(v5).DOC>>  <<Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of
Formation of Merchant Energy Ventures, LLC(v1).DOC>>  <<ENA Closing
Certificate(v2).DOC>>

_________________________
Maria I. ("Marisa") Reuter
King & Spalding
1100 Louisiana, Suite 3300
Houston, Texas 77002
713-751-3244 (tel)
713-276-7440 (fax)
 <<Reuter, Marisa.vcf>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.


Hello

Thanks for the quick response, if you wish to pay via visa I personally
can't process your card you would need to either open an account with
www.paypal.com or www.bidpay.com  -both of them take about a minute to set
up, but please note paypal is a free service while bidpay charges (but is
easier to use).

All prices are in US dollars. Please e-mail me your shipping address for
faster order processing, and include your e-mail address or auction info
with your payment to avoid processing delays.

Item of purchase : NANCY DREW COMPLETE 54 HARDCOVER BOOK SET NEW
Price : $165.00
Surface shipping (5-10 days) : $30.00  - For faster shipping options see below
Total : $195.00

- For Insurance ADD $2.00 - (if nothing arrives I will send another one no
hassles)
- For airmail shipping ADD $10.00  - (4-5 days delivery time on average)
- For express shipping ADD $20.00  - (2-4 days guaranteed with tracking and
is insured)

Payment options:

(1) Pay by credit card: through www.paypal.com (see end of e-mail for more
info) or  www.bidpay.com and the item will be shipped out as soon as
possible - note: paypal is a free service while bidpay is not
(2) Pay by money order: Upon receipt of the money order I will ship the
item out asap.

Please send you payments and make payable to:

Ms. Liz Olsen
22773 Reid Avenue
Maple Ridge, B.C.
V2X 4G7
Canada
*PLEASE remember it costs 60 cents (not 34) cents to send a letter to Canada

Paying with Paypal:

If you do not have a paypal account you will need to open one here is the
link: https://secure.paypal.com/refer/pal=onservice@telus.net

Just click on the "sign up" button on the top right corner. Please enter
your information about your self. Paypal is the most popular online payment
service available, and most auction sellers accept it. I also recommend
paypal because you can pay via credit card or bank account (takes a while
with a bank account) and they do not process your credit card on-line as
most web sites do, thus your information is not stored on the internet and
not readily available to hackers.

If you have a paypal account or have just finished signing up go to
www.paypal.com and sign in. Then click "send money" at the top of the main
page. On the next screen you need to enter info about the auction, my
e-mail address is onservice@telus.net and my last name is Olsen. If you
wish the item to be shipped somewhere besides your billing address please
make that clear under the section where you can leave a note.

It takes about 30 seconds to send money via paypal, and when you have
finished sending it paypal will send me an e-mail, upon receipt of
confirmation of payment being received I will ship the item asap.

Visit my webpage at www.INNERHORIZON.com for other great deals on
books, movies and computer games!

  Thank you
  onservice@telus.net


Is there a reason why you think you are Batman?


Yahoo! News	Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!

	Breaking News Alert	 edit
AUSTIN _ Governor of Texas signs James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Act.

	Click here!
	[IMAGE]

If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.

Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042103.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:   0.42 / Final:   0.39)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  SC_ID: EPMI