---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000
12:26 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Phillip K Allen                           06/06/2000 10:26 AM

To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://ecthou-webcl1.nt.ect.enron.com/gas/

All the gas reports are under west desk

Call Brian Hoskins for a password


okay.  Gracie

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Presas, Gracie S.
Subject: Re: Basics of Risk Management Enrollment
Importance: High

I will be late on day one.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Does anyone know about the Regulatory risks or approvals necessary with
monetization of Base Gas contained within Storage (either LDC or P/L)?

Someone from Gas Assets called about this opportunity and I wanted to
understand before setting up a meeting.

Jim


I bid $5 for Eddie Kennison.


The recipient of the 2000 Chairman's Award has been selected.  Read all about
it!

Also in this issue:
German gas monopolies
Emissions trading
Enron's status as market maker with NordPool
Trading satellite capacity

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz November 17, 2000."


Congratulations !

Now let's focus on closing the deal and getting someone else signed up.

Well done all.

AZ


-----Original Message-----
From: Black, Andy [mailto:Andy.Black@mail.house.gov]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:12 PM
To: Andrea Spring (E-mail); Annie Caputo (E-mail); Bob Nordhaus (E-mail); Bud Albright (E-mail); Cal Odom (E-mail); Charles Ingebretson (E-mail); Chris Giblin (E-mail); Cynthia Sandherr (E-mail); David Lugar (E-mail); David Lynch (E-mail); Ed Gillespie (E-mail); Gene Peters (E-mail); Jeanne Wolak (E-mail); Jeff MacKinnon (E-mail); Jim McVaney (E-mail); Joe Nipper (E-mail); Joe Vasapoli (E-mail); Shelk, John; Kathryn Steckelberg (E-mail); Kerrill Scrivner (E-mail); Les Starck (E-mail); Robertson, Linda; Linda Stuntz (E-mail); Marty Kanner (E-mail); Mike McKenna (E-mail); Mike Riith (E-mail); Mike Scrivner (E-mail); Philip Moeller (E-mail); Randy Davis (E-mail); Rhod Shaw (E-mail); Rich Glick (E-mail); Roy Coffee (E-mail); Stephen Sayle (E-mail); Yvonne Mcintyre (E-mail)
Subject: Electricity discussion draft

<<discussion draft highlights.doc>> <<discussion draft section-by-section.doc>> <<discussion draft september 21.PDF>>


Kay, are we in London during this event?
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/19/2001
11:07 AM ---------------------------

Kerry Ferrari
02/14/2001 10:34 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EES Europe Night Out - 6th March 2001

Dave/Janet

If you are in Europe that week, I would really appreciate you both coming
along and showing us all how to line dance, (we hear you're both really good
at it).

Regards

Matthew
---------------------- Forwarded by Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT on 14/02/2001 16:33
---------------------------

	Calendar Entry

Brief description:
Date:
Time:

EES Europe Night Out @ Texas Embassy!!
06/03/2001
18:30 - 23:00

Detailed description:

EES Europe Team Event
On Tuesday 6th March @ 18.30
Mosey on down to the Texas Embassy

For Line Dancing with a Live band, Food & Drink

Texas Embassy
1 Cockspur Street
Trafalgar Square
London SW1Y 5DL

Please accept this invite, if you intend to come.

Invitations have been sent to: Enron Europe EES Group
_________________________________________________________________________
Chairperson: Kerry Ferrari/LON/ECT


Sheung,
Can I get the account number so we can give the wire instructions to Enron
India when the full trade value is known this morning?
Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 07:39
AM ---------------------------

Sheung Tam <Sheung.Tam@msdw.com> on 06/14/2000 07:39:50 AM
Please respond to Sheung.Tam@msdw.com
To: Sheila Glover <Sheila.Glover@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron India LLC (Delaware Company)

Hi Sheila,
For the new account funds will have to be in the account, before any trades
being
put on the account.
Sheung

Sheila Glover wrote:

> Sheung,
> Sara is working with Anthony Capelango, MS, to get this account open.  We
are
> expecting an account number this afternoon.  I will send the number to you
when
> I hear from Anthony.
>
> The IPO is being priced today and we should know how many shares we got
> tomorrow.
> Sheila
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000
02:19 PM
> ---------------------------
>
>
>  (Embedded
>  image moved
>  to file:      From:  Sheila Glover
>  pic20211.pcx) 06/08/2000 12:43 PM
>
>
>
>
> To:   sheung.tam@ms.com
> cc:   Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Greene/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T
>       Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
> Subject:  Enron India LLC (Delaware Company)
>
> Sheung,
> We will be opening an account at Morgan Stanley for Enron India LLC (a
Delaware
> Company).  They expect to participate in an IPO on June 13th for Nasdaq
shares.
> Sara will be forwarding the documentation to you.
> Sheila
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                    Name: pic20211.pcx
>    pic20211.pcx    Type: PCX Image
(application/x-unknown-content-type-pcxfile)
>                Encoding: base64


OUR christi nicolay?

	Susan M Landwehr
	05/13/2001 10:19 PM

		 To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, mracicot@bracepatt.com
		 cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Bush visits on Thursday May 17

As some of you may know, President Bush is scheduled to visit St. Paul
Minnesota on Thursday to tour the city's District Energy system and to give a
"major speech on energy policy".  District Energy is a facility which heats
and cools 75% of the downtown buildings and is converting part of its system
to burn renewable wood biomass.  St. Paul Mayor Norm Coleman headed George's
presidential campaign in MN.

It is believed that Spence Abraham and Christi Nicolay will be accompanying
him on the trip.

They are also scheduled to visit another plant in Iowa on Thursday.


FYI.  Here it is.  I think this might do it.  It would at least set the stage
for any further discussion that might be necessary.

Stephen
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000
12:59 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Stephen P Schwarz                           02/29/2000 03:13 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Inja Chun/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Lebrane/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Evelyn Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Morrow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Regan M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth M
Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Unify AR -- SAP Plans

The attached memo details our proposal of a week ago to use SAP AR rather
than Unify AR.  As of this morning, we finalized our decision to use the SAP
AR system and to turn off Unify AR when SAP is implemented.  Please direct
any questions to myself at X33179 or Melissa White at X35704.

Please feel free to forward this memo to anyone I may have forgotten who is
interested.

Stephen
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000
01:15 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Stephen P Schwarz                           02/18/2000 04:17 PM

To: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa K
Ratnala/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves@CCMAIL, Evelyn Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura E
Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dorothy Ricketts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Unify AR -- SAP Plans

Two years ago Enron North America made a decision to use Unify AR for cash
application rather than SAP AR.  We decided at the time that SAP AR would be
kept in sync with Unify AR by the Unify/SAP interface.  We believe that the
business logic for that decision has changed, and are now recommending that
Unify AR be permanently turned off and all AR functions be performed in SAP.
I have briefly summarized the change in business situation below.

Two Years Ago	Today
Netting allowed by legal and credit ONLY if netting contract was already in
place.	Netting encouraged by legal and credit wherever possible, regardless of
existence of signed agreement.
Netting limited to one counterparty and legal entity at a time.	Canada nets across
counterparties.
Netting performed in physical only, financial settlements to maintain
separate net statement process.	ENA considering netting physical and financial
together.
All account coordinators were to apply their own cash.	Cash applied centrally in
Power, Financial and Canada  Individual coordinators apply cash only in
physical Gas.
Cash was to be applied at the line item level to track variances and to
facilitate calculation of cost of funds by commercial team.	Although gas
settlements is applying cash for some invoices at the line item level, this
functionality is not being used by power settlements and will not be used by
financial settlements.  The company has not made any move towards calculating
cost of funds by commercial team.
The Account Inquiry functionality in Unify was thought to be a key on-line
tool.	Old habits die hard...most users appear to be printing reports and reviewing
data, rather than using the on-line functionality.
Overapplication of cash was not to be allowed.  Overpayments would be
classified as "on account", with issues tracked in a case management system.	Case
management system does not exist.  Allowing overapplication helps the account
coordinators track overpayments easier than leaving cash on account.
The counterparty/legal entity combination on the deposit needed to match the
counterparty/legal entity combination on the Enron invoice.	Given the number of legal
entities Enron has, along with the number of entities our counterparties
have, this seems like a hopeless battle.  Allowing cross-application of cash
seems easier.
Corp required that intercompany settlements had to be "settled" with cash
movement.	Corp no longer requires intercompany settlements to be "settled" with cash
movement.

Converting to SAP AR simplifies the Unify/SAP interface in the following ways:
Bank deposits into SAP do not have to be split off into Unify
Cash entries in Unify do not have to be interfaced back to SAP
Unify netting entries do not have to be interfaced to SAP
Payables information does not have to be interfaced from SAP to Unify

Given the change in attitudes towards our netting business process we face
two problems in Unify.
Controls built into Unify are already obsolete.
Unify does not maintain all products in one database, making efforts to net
across products in the future (physical with financial, for instance)
impossible.

Our understanding of the netting process in SAP indicates that there are no
controls (which sounds good at this point) and that we would retain the
automatic netting entries when the payable is netted with the receivable
within SAP.  However, we emphasize that netting would be done in SAP, not at
the time of finaling a payment in Unify.

To repeat, we are recommending that Unify AR be turned off and we convert to
SAP AR.  We will schedule a meeting the week of February 22 to discuss.
Please call me at X33179 with any questions or comments.  We WILL make this
decision by February 28 because the SAP timeline does not allow any
additional time for consideration.

Stephen


D - When you get a chance, I would like to go over what has been allocated
these days.

Aim

Daren J Farmer
06/21/2000 03:11 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HL&P

I extended the deal.

D

   Aimee Lannou                06/21/2000 11:03 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HL&P

Daren - Pat gave me a a spreadsheet showing what should be allocated to
Greens Bayou.  I checked the deal ticket (286824) and it ends on 6/17.  There
is still two more days that need to be reallocated.  Please let me know if
you can extend this deal or create a new one.

Thanks.

AL


The following message is being sent to you by Network World.
As a reminder, you opted to receive e-mails on relevant
networking-related products and services when you subscribed
to Network World's e-mail newsletters.  Please see below for
more information about this mailing.
______________________________________________________

IMPROVE BOTTOM LINE WITH JUSTIFIABLE STORAGE ACQUISITIONS
http://www.itworld.com/jwc/itwnwem05/LS_Storage_reg

Dear Colleague,

Free-flowing capital is a thing of the past, and bringing storage problems under control with a restricted budget is your reality. Now more than ever you must be able to justify your technology acquisition recommendations to management. How can you be sure your purchase will deliver on its ROI promise? You're invited to watch the "Maximizing Storage ROI" webcast and discover a more strategic management approach to storage that leads to a greater ROI on your storage acquisitions.

LET TECHNOLOGY VETERANS' INSIGHT BE YOUR GUIDE
http://www.itworld.com/jwc/itwnwem05/LS_Storage_reg

Tune in now for expert answers to these and other pressing questions:

1.  How can you identify potential storage problems before they disrupt your business?

2.  What requirements for effective storage management must be addressed before an infrastructure can deliver on its promise?

3.  What's more important in a storage product: manageability or technical characteristics?

4.  What does it take to get upper management buy-in to your acquisition justification?

Join former Computerworld Editor-In-Chief, Bill Laberis, and storage guru and author, Jon Toigo, during this dynamic webcast.  Their insights will help you approach your storage technology and management challenges in a way that maximizes your ROI.

VISIT FREE WEBCAST FOR QUICK AND EASY ACCESS TO EXPERT INFORMATION
http://www.itworld.com/jwc/itwnwem05/LS_Storage_reg

This webcast is available at your convenience 24/7 and is completely searchable by keyword for quick and easy information gathering. Simply click and watch. You'll get a fresh new perspective on how to solve your storage challenges.

We look forward to having you join us online!
http://www.itworld.com/jwc/itwnwem05/LS_Storage_reg

P.S.  Watch this webcast on maximizing storage ROI and see what nearly 1,000 of your peers have already learned and are putting into practice. http://www.itworld.com/jwc/itwnwem05/LS_Storage_reg

Sponsored by:
Cisco Systems
Hewlett-Packard
IBM

Produced by: ITworld.com - changing the way you view IT

____________________________________________________________

When you subscribed to Network World's email newsletters you indicated
that you wished to receive relevant 3rd party information via email.  If you
wish to discontinue receiving this type of message simply click the reply
button and place "UNSUBSCRIBE"  in the subject line.  Please be sure
to use "reply" (rather than composing a new message), so that we may
properly handle your request.


Dan,

Here is another example from SMUD.  FYI.

Thanks,

Kim
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Ward/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001 08:16 AM
---------------------------

Calvin Miller <cmiller@smud.org> on 03/07/2001 04:56:37 PM
To: "Kim Ward (E-mail)" <kim.ward@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: SMUD Master Natural Gas Purchase Agreement

Kim-
Attached is a sample copy of the District's Natural Gas Purchase Agreement.

 <<Master Agreement Enron North America Corp March 200100.doc>>

Calvin Miller

 - Master Agreement Enron North America Corp March 200100.doc


Tva's Solar Project Will Power 50 Homes
Source: The Commercial Appeal
Publication date: 2001-06-13
Arrival time: 2001-06-14

The Tennessee Valley Authority plans to build one of the largest urban solar
power projects in the country this summer, with enough panels to cover a
240-space parking lot.
The solar panels will generate up to 90 kilowatts of electricity, enough to
meet the power needs of about 50 homes and shelter football fans at the
downtown Finley Stadium.
"It's a great site," said Gary Harris, manager of TVA's Green Power program.
"It's a very visible location from the highway coming into downtown
Chattanooga and will allow thousands of persons who go to the stadium to see
the solar panels up close."
The panels will provide covered parking and shade on the south side of the
stadium. TVA will spend more than $500,000 to pave the parking lot and erect
the panels.
The project is a part of TVA's Green Power Switch, a pilot launched last
year, allowing customers in select cities to choose electricity generated by
wind, sunlight and landfill gas.
Most of TVA's power comes from nuclear, fossil-fuel and hydroelectric plants.
More than 3,600 TVA customers have agreed to pay more for power generated
from renewable sources. People may buy blocks of "green power" in 150
kilowatt-hour bulks for an extra $4 a month.
TVA has already sold more than 11,000 blocks, or enough to generate more than
$528,000 in extra revenue annually.
TVA, which generates solar power from nine sites across the valley, also has
qualified for federal assistance for its program through the Virginia
Alliance for Solar Energy.


Good Morning Jan. Hope you had a nice weekend.
Just wanted to give you an update on some work I did over the weekend and ask
for your assistance on finding some information.

UPDATE:

1. I went into the firechief.com webpage and could not find your Ad. Would
you please check into this and make sure they post it ASAP, especially since
our time frame is quite tight. Also, have we considered posting the Ad on the
International Fire Chiefs webpage as well? The International Fire Chief
webpage is fantastic and would likely reach a much wider audience.

2. I spent a few hours on the internet this weekend looking at numerous web
sites related to fire departments/associations. I compiled a list of
decorated fire chiefs and fire chiefs on various fire related boards,
committees, etc... (for example, I downloaded the international fire chiefs
directory and board members of the Metropolitan Fire Chiefs Association.)
Let's try to get together after my meeting this morning with Dennis or this
afternoon and go over the list.

ASSISTANCE:

1. I'd like to compile some information on past Houston fire chiefs.
Specifically, their backgrounds and some history - especially information on
the problematic fire chiefs (Swartout). I've started the list and included
below. Would you please take the lead in completing this list?

Christopher Connealy, Mayor Lee Brown
10/2000-present, acting HFD Fire Chief
20-year department veteran
assistant fire chief, YEARS?

Lester Trya, Mayor Lee Brown
3/98-10/2000
10/2000 resigned his position as HFD Fire Chief in mutual agreement with the
mayor
1974-1991 - President of Houston Professional Fire Fighters Association
29 years as Houston Firefighter, 27 of which were on the union board

Notes:
- Father retired fire inspector, son is firefighter
- Management style described as fiery and combative and well known for
strongly worded attacks on chiefs and mayors
- leave of absence until January, when he will return to the department,
probably as district fire chief

Eddie Corral,

Robert Clayton, Mayor Kathy Whitmire
1985-1992, HFD Fire Chief

Swartout,

Specifics of the 3 1/2 month tenure of Fire Chief Swartout
- This will be very important since consensus is to seek an outsider. What we
should focus on here are the issues/concerns raised when he was named, the
criticisms upon his sudden departure and very importantly what were his
reasons for leaving?

Who was Chief before Swartout?
background?

Thanks for your help Jan. I'll give you a call sometime around 10am to see
what your schedule is like today . I'll talk to you then!

Lisa
713-345-4840 (office)
713-569-9563 (cell)


Steve:

I spoke with Sam Behrends, Adam Wenner (FERC attorneys) and Joanne Rutkowski
(SEC attorney) about your question on a third quarter close.   On the FERC
side, protests to the merger application are due on May 3.  We are expecting
protests, but until we see the extent of the opposition, its hard to estimate
the likelihood of a July order.  However, we all agree that based on the
facts of the merger and the types of protests we expect to see, a July order
is within the realm of possibility.  FERC just issued an order approving the
PECO/ComEd merger earlier this week.  The order was issued 142 days after the
merger application was filed.  If FERC does not find the opposition to the
PGE/Sierra merger overwhelming, it could issue an order before FERC goes on
August recess (this would also allow FERC to meet its 150 day target for
acting on merger petitions).

Even if a FERC order is issued by the end of July, we will still need SEC
approval.  (The SEC will not issue its order until FERC has approved the
merger.)  Joanne Rutkowski thinks that although a September order from the
SEC is possible, it is not likely, due mainly to the fact that several other
big merger proceedings (NSP, AEP, Energy East, ComEd) are in the queue ahead
of the PGE/Sierra merger awaiting SEC approval.

With regard to the Hart-Scott-Rodino filing with DOJ, DOJ approval is
normally not a problem, but attorneys with DOJ have expressed some concern
that the merged Sierra/PGE company could have potential market power in
transmission going into southern California.  DOJ has submitted a request for
information to Sierra and PGE, and we are working on the response to that
request now.  Our attorneys and Sierra's attorneys do not think at this point
that obtaining DOJ approval of the merger will be a problem, but until we
receive final DOJ sign-off on the merger, DOJ review will continue to be an
open issue.  We should have a better idea of whether DOJ is going to raise
any significant problems with the merger within the next couple of months.

I see that Paul sent you a separate email on the status of the state
proceedings.

I hope this is helpful.  Please call me if you have any questions.

Sarah

Steven J Kean@EES
04/12/2000 08:02 PM
To: Paul Kaufman@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Granite Update

What are our chances of final approval at FERC at the JUly meeting.  Jeff
still thinks this is a third quarter close.  Do we have any chance of making
that happen?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 04/12/2000 06:59
PM ---------------------------

Paul Kaufman@ECT
04/12/2000 09:02 AM
To: Mitchell Taylor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, awalia@ei.enron.com, Ann
Ballard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, kfullenweider@velaw.com, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Granite Update

Attached is the April 12 update.  Also attached is an electronic copy of a
prior update faxed last week.


Steve,

FYI

Vince


Rhonda:
Thanks so much for your help on this.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Rhonda L Denton
	06/01/2001 03:20 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reliant

I am missing Deal No. 74419 on your sheet.  It is Enpower No. 295870.  Will
fax.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/13/99 05:42
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Marcy A Youngerman                           05/13/99 04:48 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: NY State Gas & Electric

Great  - Thanks for the update.

Sara Shackleton
05/13/99 02:06 PM
To: Marcy A Youngerman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NY State Gas & Electric

Just got off the phone with the lawyer.  We have only minor comments and he
needs to check with his credit people regarding the collateral threshold.  I
will wait to hear back before sending out a revision.  Sara


I still have a PRC tomorrow am, but will let Kathy know my status as I get
closer to lunch.

Julie Armstrong
12/11/2000 03:43 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Holiday lunch is confirmed

A reminder of our lunch tomorrow, December 12th at America's.  We are
confirmed for 12:30 and the reservation is under my name.
America's is located on 1800 Post Oak Blvd.  in the Pavilion Shopping
Center.  713-961-1492
Please call me if you have any questions at x33597.  Thanks.


(See attached file: HPLN1109.xls)

 - HPLN1109.xls


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 03:17 PM -----

	Mark Taylor
	08/03/2000 10:20 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000 10:20 AM -----

	George Zivic
	08/03/2000 09:28 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Mark,

could you please review the attached CA from NextSet.
we will not need to look at the LOI at this time.
Please call me if this should be directed elsewhere or with any questions
w/r/t  information below.

Thanks
George Zivic
3-7489
---------------------- Forwarded by George Zivic/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000 09:21
AM ---------------------------

Gillian Johnson
08/03/2000 08:57 AM
To: David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: George Zivic/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Next steps

If we can find an attorney in Houston, I would be all for moving forward with
it.  The truth is that a 2 day delay will not ruin the relationship.  Since I
am on vacation today and tomorrow, I would ask George to investigate Houston
lawyers.  George I think we use Mark Taylor but please confirm this with
Moazzam.

Thanks.

Gillian

David Weekes
03/08/2000 03:03
To: Gillian Johnson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Next steps

Gillian

Apparently we are short of lawyers this week.  Will it be OK to get back on
this next week or do you want to show it to a lawyer in Houston ?

David
---------------------- Forwarded by David Weekes/LON/ECT on 03/08/2000 09:04
---------------------------

David Weekes
03/08/2000 08:11
To: Gillian Johnson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Next steps

Gillian

Thanks - that makes sense.  I will get legal to look at the CA.

David

Gillian Johnson
02/08/2000 20:49
To: David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Next steps

George and I agree that we should not consider signing the LOI now, but
should sign the CA so that we can share information and hold further
discussions to jointly develop the nature of the relationship.  In the LOI
sent, they are making declarations that we have not fully flushed out,
therefore, we are not prepared to sign that.

Hope that helps.

Thanks.

Gillian

David Weekes
02/08/2000 12:50
To: Gillian Johnson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Next steps

Gillian

Before I get legal and PR to look at this could you give me a bit more
background on the potential arrangement with NextSet. I dont understand where
the need for training will come in.

I know that generally Enron has a policy of not being seen to endorse a
client's products. PR may therefore have a problem with giving NextSet the
ability to put our logo on their site. How important is this likely to be ?

Regards

David

Gillian Johnson
02/08/2000 16:03
To: David Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Craig Chaney/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Next steps

---------------------- Forwarded by Gillian Johnson/LON/ECT on 02/08/2000
15:58 ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Anupam Mishra <amishra@NextSet.com>
01/08/2000 18:13

To: "'gillian.johnson@enron.com'" <gillian.johnson@enron.com>,
"'george.zivic@enron.com'" <george.zivic@enron.com>
cc: Leigh Clarke <lclarke@NextSet.com>

Subject: Next steps

Gillian and George,

Thanks again for stopping by this morning.  Per our conversation, I am
attaching a mutual NDA and a standard LOI.  With the former in place, we
should both be able to get a little deeper into the technology to see if
there is a strong fit between our respective companies.  I would be very
interested to introduce our CTO with your technology counterpart the next
time he is in town.  Feel free to schedule that meeting through me.  All the
best.

Regards,
Anupam

Anupam Mishra
Business Development
NextSet Software, Inc.
(650) 251-4119

>  <<Software LOI.pdf>>  <<MNDA.pdf>>

 - Software LOI.pdf
 - MNDA.pdf


Peter -

We have thought about this from time to time.  Our primary concern has not
been the strict adherence to the contractual notice requirements (because of
the lack of substantive concern you mention) but the fear of possible waiver
of rights that might take place if the requests are not consistent or handled
carefully.  These are all issues that apply to trading margin calls
generally.  Most recently Carol St. Clair, who Mark H. has asked to be the
point lawyer for Credit and credit issues, has been working on this problem.

Mark

	Peter Keohane
	05/31/2001 11:54 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Russell Diamond/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Margin Calls - Financial

Mark, I recently was dealing with Russell in Credit on a margin call letter
for IMC Canada and it seemed to me that the letter in substance met Credit's
requirements but did not comply with the ISDA in terms of formalities (i.e.
use of defined terms, currency specification, notice and delivery timing,
notice addresses, etc.).  It seemed to me that the form they are using may
have been drafted some time ago and needs to be updated so that it is not a
drafting exercise on a case by case basis.  Practically, to the extent that
the counterparty will not object to delivery, there really is no substantive
concern.  However, as credit is becoming a significant issue in commodity
markets, if the counterparty wants to object, particularly in circumstances
where their credit is getting "tight", I can see the lack of contractual
compliance perhaps being problematic.  Can somebody in your group develop a
template (perhaps a few will be required) that could be used under the Enron
form, the "industrial" form, the ISDA form and for Canada.  Please call
Russell, Bill or me to discuss.  Peter.


Got 'em.  Let me know when you can get out of here.  I guess we'll have to
ride the bus.  I'm not sure.  Unless you want to try to bribe the parking
people again.


John/John/Frank

As we are approaching the November 1st Trading Track interview dates, we need to finalize the reminder of the external candidate's initial screen.

Can you please provide me with your feedback/status.   If we need to re-assign your candidates to other traders please let me know by return.

Thanks,

Karen
x54667


Some of you have already migrated to Windows 2000 and some are still waiting to be.  Our group is schedule to get migrated to Outlook (e-mail) on May 8.  In order for this to happen you must already have Windows 2000.  If you are still waiting to be migrated to Windows 2000, please let me know.  Also if you have already been migrated to Outlook or if you will be travelling during May 8 I need to know.  Attached is some information on Outlook that you should read prior to migrating.  It is also suggested that one week prior to migrating to Outlook that you take the one hour training session.  At the bottom of the attached document is a contact number to schedule your training.  Any questions please call me 646-6508.


Enron Corp. has authorized the Unit to file suit immediately against Event
Resources Incorporated (&ERI8) and Diane Nielson (the president and one of
the owners of ERI) for breach of contract and conversion of a deposit of
approximately $248,000.00 relating to the Enron 2000 Holiday Party.

Additionally, Enron will be making a demand for defense and indemnity on ERI
pursuant to an arbitration filed by Hilton Hotels Corporation, as managing
agent for Palacio Del Rio, Ltd. against ERI and Enron Corp.  Hilton alleges
that ERI owes Hilton approximatley $135,000.00 in penalties for breach of a
reservation agreement and that ERI was acting as Enron Corp.'s agent at the
time.  If ERI does not assume its defense and indemnity obligations, Enron
Corp. will sue ERI for that as well.

If you know of any reason that Enron Corp. should not pursue these suits,
please contact me by e-mail at bdavis@enron.com by Thursday, December 14,
2000 at 5:00 p.m.  If I do not hear from you by then, I will assume that you
have no objection to Enron Corp. pursuing these suits.


Please get this to Mark Frevert.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 11:38 AM -----

	Wayne Gresham
	03/30/2001 02:07 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Junior Achievement

Mark,

I would be interested in participating, assuming I am here that day.

Wayne

**************************************
Wayne E. Gresham
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3857
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 853-1485 (T)
(713) 646-4842 (F)
**************************************
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged information.  Any review, use,
disclosure or distribution by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient (s) is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply and destroy all copies of the original message.

----- Forwarded by Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2001 02:06 PM -----

	Alan Aronowitz
	03/27/2001 05:26 PM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ned E Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel
R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dominic Carolan/Enron@EnronXGate,
Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Junior Achievement

Please let Mark know if you are interested in participating in this program.

Alan
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 05:23 PM -----

	Mark E Haedicke
	03/27/2001 03:10 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy
Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Junior Achievement

Let me know if anyone in your group is interested.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2001 02:51 PM -----

	Mark Frevert/ENRON@enronXgate
	Sent by: Nicki Daw/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/27/2001 11:50 AM

		 To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/ENRON@enronXgate, Timothy J
Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Oxley/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Josey/ENRON@enronXgate, C John Thompson/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael L
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Ozzie Pagan/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Tholan/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Garner/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/ENRON@enronXgate, Greg
Hermans/ENRON@enronXgate, Rodney Malcolm/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert
Saltiel/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Battaglia/Enron@enronXgate, Brad
Kirchhofer/ENRON@enronXgate, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill W
Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrew Kelemen/ENRON@enronXgate, Brenda F
Herod/ENRON@enronXgate, Delmar Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Daniel
Hamilton/ENRON@enronXgate, Kent Castleman/ENRON@enronXgate, Fran L
Mayes/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen H Douglas/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrea V
Reed/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert W Jones/ENRON@enronXgate, Suresh
Raghavan/ENRON@enronXgate, Andy Zipper/ENRON@enronXgate, Rex
Shelby/ENRON@enronXgate, Thomas D Gros/ENRON@enronXgate, Dan
Bruce/ENRON@enronXgate, Jenny Rub/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Shirley Tijerina/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Fallon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tina
Rode/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Clyatt/ENRON@enronXgate, Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Megan Angelos/ENRON@enronXgate, Cherylene Westbrook/ENRON@enronXgate, Tamara
Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tonai Lehr/ENRON@enronXgate, Anabel
Gutierrez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy Chapman/ENRON@enronXgate, Janette
Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon Purswell/ENRON@enronXgate, Sue
Ford/ENRON@enronXgate, Marsha Schiller/ENRON@enronXgate, Peggy
McCurley/ENRON@enronXgate, Tina Spiller/ENRON@enronXgate, Patti
Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lacye Trevino/NA/Enron@Enron, Patricia
English/Enron@EnronXGate, Angela Collins/ENRON@enronXgate, Christy
Chapman/ENRON@enronXgate, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Junior Achievement

On Wednesday, April 11, 2001, Enron, in conjunction with Junior Achievement,
will host 40 students from Westside High School and Kerr High School for a
day of Job Shadowing.  This program,s objectives are to demonstrate why a
sound education, interpersonal skills, and a strong work ethic are needed to
be successful in the workplace.

The Job Shadowing program consists of the following:

 8:45 AM  Students arrive
 9:00 - 10:30 AM Welcome, Overview, Video, and Tours
 10:30 - 12:00 N Individual Job Shadow Experience with Enron Employees
 12:00 - 1:00 PM Student Lunch with Closing Comments
 1:00 PM  Students return to schools

We need your assistance in identifying individuals within your area who would
be available to assist with the job shadowing experience.  Please contact
Nicki Daw ASAP with your recommendations.  More detailed information will be
supplied to the employees assisting.

Thank you for your support of the Enron/Junior Achievement Job Shadowing
program.


YIPPEEE


NYMEX Membership Services
March 12, 2001
Notice # MS-17

SWITCH OF LESSOR

Please be advised that effective with the close of business, March 12, 2001,
the following member(s) will switch their lessor within the Exchange:

Glenn Rudolfsky (OAHU-4739)

 Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to
advise the Corporate Secretary,s Office of any claims in accordance with Rule
2.51.

 Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member Services
Department (212) 299-2379.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(MS-17)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001
09:18 AM ---------------------------

"insiderSCORES.com" <webserver@insiderSCORES.com> on 02/15/2001 02:13:03 AM
To: "vkamins@enron.com" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Today's U.S. Insider Commentary

insiderSCORES.com nightly alert for Thursday, February 15, 2001
The Official Scorer of Insider Trading

Today's U.S. Insider Commentary

--------------------------------Advertisement--------------------
_________________________________________________________________

***Explosive Swing Trading Strategies Identified!

Long-EXTR 39 3/4 pt. EXPLOSION in just 5 days!
Long-SONS 17 7/8 pt. MOVE in just 48 hours!
Short-OPTV 42 1/2  pt. IMPLOSION in a week!
How is this possible? Click here!
http://www.tradersgalleria.com/tfn/e.cfm?book=5109&a=land

_________________________________________________________________

These 'Breaking News' articles were recently posted to the site:

Largest Group Selling at AMR Corp. in Over Three Years
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1747

Very Prescient Director Buys Again at Aspect Communications Corp.
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1748

First Sells in Nearly a Year at Citrix Systems Inc.
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1749

Rare Disposals at DuPont Photomasks Inc.
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1750

Largest Sale Since June 1997 at Ultratech Stepper Inc.
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1751

Largest Insider Purchase Ever at Black Hills Corp.
http://www.insiderscores.com/alerts/art.asp?1752

-----------------------------Network ad-------------------------
________________________________________________________________

****These are the 5 stocks you should be
    looking at for tomorrow morning!
        CLICK HERE NOW.

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/index.cfm/lp_a/?src=tf1

________________________________________________________________

- Today's Most Predictive Insider Transactions:

Insider RUBIN [score: 91] Buys 10,000 shares of
CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORP [CMO]

Insider KIMMEL [score: 87] Buys 2,318 shares of
KIMCO REALTY CORP [KIM]

Insider BODDE [score: 87] Buys 348 shares of
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT CO [KLT]

Insider BERMUDEZ [score: 85] Buys 3,885 shares of
POPULAR INC [BPOP]

Insider LUCAS [score: 83] Buys 10,000 shares of
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC [CDN]

Insider VACHON [score: 98] Sells 20,000 shares of
LIBERATE TECHNOLOGIES [LBRT]

Insider LIMP [score: 96] Sells 20,000 shares of
LIBERATE TECHNOLOGIES [LBRT]

Insider ROUX [score: 92] Sells 130,000 shares of
LIBERATE TECHNOLOGIES [LBRT]

Insider FRYLING [score: 88] Sells 5,000 shares of
COOPER COMPANIES INC [COO]

Insider SIEGEL [score: 88] Sells 1,300,000 shares of
UTI ENERGY CORP [UTI]

http://www.insiderscores.com

If you would like to UNSUBSCRIBE from this service, please visit:
http://www.insiderscores.com/unsubscribe

******************************************************************
Interested in achieving advertising results? Contact Drew Doyle at
1-480-367-9449 x284 or mailto:adplace@insidersb.com


Attached please find the market simulation schedule for this week.   The
week's
market simulation will be in coordination with the ISO.

(See attached file: Stage 6.7 Extended Mkt Sim Schedule.doc)

We have not received the official date for the ISO launch.  We will keep you
informed.

Thank you.

 - Stage 6.7 Extended Mkt Sim Schedule.doc


With ECS (Enron Center South) rapidly approaching completion, Enron is forced
to change the numbering scheme on the existing Stentofon system.  To increase
our capacity to support this expansion, we must increase the number of valid
Stentofon address numbers.  Enron currently uses 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600
and 900 series numbers for the addresses.  In order to add more addresses to
the system, Enron will be converting the dial plan from a three digit dialing
system to a four digit dialing scheme on the Stentofon system.  This
conversion is scheduled to occur on the weekend of May 18th.

In efforts to minimize confusion, we will convert all Stentofon addresses in
EB1 to a 4000 series number.    (i.e.  If your Stento number was 364, then
your new number will be 4364.)  We will also change all speed dials to
reflect the new dialing scheme.  Please instruct the users within your group
of this change.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

Regards,
Darren Adamik
Mgr.-Trading Technology
Enron Net Works, LLC
713.853.4764 Office
713-853-9828 Fax
mailto:darren.p.adamik@enron.com


The next RCR meeting will take place Monday, April 16, 2001 at 12:00 P.M.
(CDT).  The dial in number is 1-800-283-1805 with Rick listed as the host.

Thanks and call if you have any questions.


Luke:
I will take a look at this either tonite or in the morning.  Since the UEI
Holdings Guaranty which we reference in paragraph 9 of the Amendment covered
both US and Canada transactions, I don't think that we can say that it has
been terminated until we sign up the Engage Canada deal.  Can you add
language to the Coastal Guaranty that takes care of this instead.  I would
prefer to say in paragraph 9 of the Engage US amendment that "The Guaranty of
Party B dated as of May 19, 1997, heretofore delivered by UEI Holdings Inc.,
formerly known as Union Energy Inc. in favor of Party A as beneficiary, is
hereby replaced by an executed Guaranty from Coastal Corporation, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit B but only with respect to the
obligations of party B under the Master Agreement that are guaranteed
thereunder."  Let me know what you think.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Luke.Mickum@EngageEnergy.com
	07/10/2000 10:47 AM

		 To: carol.st.clair@enron.com
		 cc: Michael.Hugetz@EngageEnergy.Com, Jeff.Buzonas@EngageEnergy.com
		 Subject: Amendments to ISDA Master Enron/Engage Energy US, L.P.

Attached is the standard Coastal guaranty form we use for ISDAs.? I
understand this ISDA is just for these financial instruments and not for the
physical side of the business.? Please give me your comments, if any.

We will split the guaranty with a Coastal guaranty for Engage US and
Westcoast for Engage Canada.?? Since the new threshold is $10 million, the
Coastal guaranty cap is $10 million.?

??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Regards,

??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? Luke
<<Guaranty form ISDA-Engage.doc>>

 - Guaranty form ISDA-Engage.doc


Chris,

We won't have any site specific technical info, so we will  have to fly
without it.  I know that seems strange, but there is no designated site for
this equipment as of now.

Here's co#1:

Each of these units has one dual fuel option.

The master list of serial numbers is in this document:

We use the unit serial numbers as opposed to turbine or generator serial
numbers.  I'm sending you the whole enchilada since this is a handy reference.

I agree with adding 25% of the cost of the dual fuel option to the January
payment.  Unit 17  to company 1 is fine.  The maximum liability price (or
whatever we call it) will be the base price allocation, plus the dual fuel
option amount.

Good question on the retention.  I guess we should set it up as if each is in
a stand alone project. As far as I know they may be intending to put these at
separate sites.

I'll get back to you on the fax and contract reference number.

Thanks,

Kay


As stated in our November 16 issue of The Prometheus File, Reed Wasden Research will be sending our daily publication and morning notes for a 45-day trial period.  Included is our daily update and notes on companies that RWR follows.  For those who do not wish to receive the daily updates, please reply with WEEKLY ONLY as the subject.  Please allow one day for your request to be processed.

Best regards,
Cary, Peter and the Team


There will be a Q & A Meeting for the Power & Gas Market Team.  This meeting will take place today @ 11:00 AM in ESC 6980.

Thank you,

Irena Hogan
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Enron Americas
(713) 853-6143


AN ISO STAGE 2 ALERT (5% Reserve Margin) HAS BEEN DECLARED.

Today, 05/31/2001, California's electric reserves are approaching critically
low levels.  To avoid possible blackouts and help lower energy costs, we
need your help.  Please take the necessary actions to reduce non-critical
electric use as soon as possible.

The next blocks scheduled for rolling blackouts are blocks 1 and 2.

Thank you for your cooperation.

*If you already receive these notices, please disregard.  Thank you.
Laura


work e-mail: jbutler@null-lairson.com


Feast your eyes on Enron Business' cool and colorful new look.  You'll find
it in your mailbox at home and online at home.enron.com under Publications,
Enron Business, and "Volume 1, 2001".  (And if you're in Houston, you might
find a few extra copies at the Plaza Java in the lobby of the Enron Building.)

In this issue:
? Enron Industrial Markets invigorates an "old economy" marketplace by
creating transparent trading systems for paper, pulp and steel;
? Jeff Skilling takes a look back at 2000 and tells us what to expect in 2001
) and gives us a few intimate details about himself;
? LNG becomes a promising option;
? Enron salutes the 100th anniversary of Spindletop;
? The Insider takes at look at how gas trading books work;
? Find out what you told us should be Enron's 2001 New Year's Resolutions )
and enter our Word Search to win a $50 American Express gift certificate!
Don't dally ) the deadline for entries is Friday, March 30; and
? Have you got an extreme hobby?  We want to know about it!  For details,
start reading(


I just wanted to confirm the first meeting of the Analyst/Associate Committee on Monday, March 26 from 8:00-10:00 am in the 50th Floor Dining Room (eb50m).  You will find an agenda for the meeting below, as well as attachments containing a recent overview of the program by business unit, and the results of an October 2000 survey of program participants.  This information should help you prepare for our meeting.

Feel free to contact me at x36671 if you would like to discuss anything prior to the meeting.  I look forward to working with each of you.

Regards,
Billy

__________________________________________
Meeting Agenda
March 26, 2001

I.	Welcome and Introductions (John Sherriff)

II.	Program Overview (Billy Lemmons)
		a.	Business Unit Summary
		b.	Program Survey

III.	Discussion Topics (Group)
		a.	Program Leadership
		b.	Business Plan (Focus, Metrics)
		c..	Focus Areas (what's working / what's not...)
				-	Culture / Location
				-	Recruiting
				-	Rotations
				-	Orientation
				- 	Training
				-	PRC

IV.	Next Meeting / Next Steps (Billy Lemmons)

__________________________________________
Attachments


Customer Support Group is committed to continuous improvement of our service.
 This survey focuses on the services you receive from the Resolution Center,
Desktop Support, Hardware, and System Access Support.  In order to improve,
we need to hear from you. This survey should only take about 5 to 8 minutes
to complete. Your input is key to our success. The deadline for returning
this survey is April 20, 2001.  We appreciate your participation.

http://nahou-webcl1.corp.enron.com/inquisite/QuarterlySurveyMarch2001/Quarterl
ySurveyMarch2001.html


I think you need to do their reviews.  I would coordinate with Jeff Hodge to
make sure you get the appropriate feedback from Houston.


Shirley,

Please, forward this info to John Sherriff in London on my behalf. Make sure
the entire body of the message is included.

Vince
**********************************************************

John,

I am sending you a proposed draft of the announcement about Steve Leppard.
Sorry for the delay.

When I was leaving London, the question of reporting lines was still
unresolved. It wasn't  decided if Steve would report to Richard Lewis
directly or  to structuring. Steve's preference was reporting to Richard
Lewis. This issue was to be resolved between you and Richard (based on the
last conversation I had with Richard). The 2nd reporting line is to me.
The draft is below.

Vince

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

The Enron Europe Research group has experienced rapid growth over the last
year as it has become clear that there are tremendous opportunities to
utilize their unique quantitative skills in supporting both new and ongoing
business efforts in the London offices.  Because of this, we are appointing
a group leader with the view to leveraging the group better across the many
business areas in Enron Europe which are benefiting from research support.

Effective   immediately,   Steven  Leppard  will  take  responsibility  for
spearheading  research  efforts  in  London  and  managing the London based
research  team.   Steve  joined  Enron  in early 1999 and has distinguished
himself   through   his   many  contributions  including  analysis  of  the
"Supergoal"  scheduling  system  and development of a diagrammatic approach
for  real  options  analysis.  He holds a PhD. in Mathematical Physics from
Kings  College  London  and  an honours degree in Mathematics from Imperial
College.   Steve is also a black-belt level instructor in Kungfu.

Please join us in congratulating Steve on his new responsibilities.


Please see the attached.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000
05:38 PM ---------------------------

Karry Kendall
06/28/2000 12:23 PM
To: Jim Pond/corp/enron@enron, Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette Miroballi/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne
Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: FERC Training

Duane and Cindy need a list of the individuals needed this training.  Please
respond directly to them if members of your shops need to attend.  If there
are other areas I have not considered please let them know.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 12:11
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Duane Fritz @ ENRON                           06/28/2000 09:05 AM

To: Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FERC Training

The training will focus on the drill down into the FERC numbers in SAP.
The view role is going to be taught with the production system and real
numbers.
Whomever uses and needs to get these numbers for external reporting will need
this training.
I am going to schedule a 4 hour session for each class.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Duane

Karry Kendall@ECT
06/27/2000 08:31 PM
To: Duane Fritz/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: FERC Training

What will be covered in the training?

---------------------- Forwarded by Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000 08:27
PM ---------------------------

Cynthia Morrow@ENRON
06/27/2000 03:49 PM
To: Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Gruesen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Duane Fritz/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: FERC Training

---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Morrow/Corp/Enron on 06/27/2000
04:48 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Duane Fritz                           06/27/2000 02:24 PM

To: Cynthia Morrow/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FERC Training

Cindy,   I need to get a list of the people who are going to need FERC
training for the ENA group.
GPG has sent me a list of people to train but nothing has been planned or
confirmed.
I would like to schedule the training for the 3rd week of August after the
July close.  I am planning to train the view role
from the production data translated by the module for july.  If we can get a
head count then I can tentatively book
the rooms and equipment to do the training for August.
Thanks
Duane


Mark,

It appears there was a mixup in contracts admin. Copies of the licenses
should be forthcoming shortly.

What is the ETA for the legal analysis of the impact of becoming regulated -
i.e. at what point are we subject to regulations, and what is the impact?

Dave


Here are my comments--I'd like to take out the stuff about the rate and any
implication that we have flexible terms and conditions.  DF

From: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 08:45 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Red Rock posting

Please see the attached and let me know your comments as soon as possible.


Per our conversation, I would appreciate your input on the questions from a legal perspective.  Thanks for your help.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yowman, Andrea
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Warner, Traci
Cc:	Coleman, Jacqueline; Jones, Donna; Walt, John; Brown, Milton
Subject:	Super Saturday Questionnaire (Oct. 27) - Ready for testing

<http://survey.confirmit.com/wi/p51884738/i.asp>

Attached is the URL to test the questionnaire.  Please review the content for consistency.  I would like to complete any final changes today.  We will do our final/final walkthru at the hotel on Friday.   Once I clear the test responses, you will be live and will not want anyone going into the survey to play...

Thanks...
ay


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	TMS Weekly Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		9/19/2001
Time:		1:30 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Mr. Sorte,

Michael Brown and Janelle Schueur have requested that I forward this
confidentiality agreement to your attention.

Regards,

Kay Mann


Sara:

Would you please send me a list of authorized traders for Enron NA Corp?  We
are
updating our files and noticed that we are missing an ATL for Enron.

*ATL form:
(See attached file: ATL Enron NA Corp.doc)

Thank you,
Tom Alterson

 - ATL Enron NA Corp.doc


good seats sill available

	Matthew Arnold

	11/27/2000 12:33:48 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: not good for the under

guess who is a sponsor of the galleryfurniture.com bowl?  tickets available
in the energizer for $8.


Handout 'Lecture 8: Mortgage Passthroughs' for Class: 'E283-1: Real Estate Finance' is now available through the Izio system.  You will find it in the 'Handout' section.

Note: To stop receiving these notifications, please uncheck the box labeled 'I want to be notified by email when course information is updated' in the 'Properties' section under the HOME menu bar.

===========================================
This message was sent from the Izio system at http://haas.Izio.convene.com.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this email or the Izio system, please forward them to IzioSupport@convene.com.


He's actually around until Monday.  Then he goes to Corvallis for a meeting
and leaves that evening.  We could possibly hook up Sun. night.

Marcus B. Jones
MCA Architects, P.C.
PH (503)226-0622
FAX (503)226-0626
30 NW 1st Ave.
Portland, OR 97209

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 9:25 AM
To: Marcus Jones
Subject: Re: Marc Coming to Town

Hey how late will he be here on sunday.  I think I get in town at 5


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000 08:59 AM -----

	Tom Moran
	08/21/2000 06:15 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron
Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 08/21/00

The EOL approvals for 08/21/00 are attached below.

Regards,
tm


John, you have my approval.  Jim

From: John West on 12/12/2000 03:50 PM
To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:

Jim,                                In 1998,  ENA removed from its balance
sheet a loan made to The American Coal Company through a transaction with
Society Generale.  In 1999 the deal was restructured and Soc Gen was taken
out by Bank of America.  As part of both transactions, there was an  absolute
put agreement to Enron in favor of Soc Gen and B of A.  B of A has indicated
it intends to exercise the put which will have the effect of moving the loan
back on the books of Enron.  Enron's business people don't want this to
happen and are going to arrange to have a Whitewing entity buy out the B of A
position.  In order to timely complete the project, outside counsel needs to
be engaged.  John Dawson at Vinson & Elkins worked on the original
transaction and has been contacted about this project.  Please acknowledge
that it is acceptable to use John Dawson and the firm of Vinson & Elkins on
this project.  The dollar amount of the transaction is approximately
$92.0mm.  Thank you for your quick response as the business parties want to
close the deal asap.  John West


Rudwell:

You are handling this counterparty from a credit perspective.  Rich Friedman from Global Markets has called to inquire about the status of this ISDA request.  Please refer to Lotus Notes to review the last action taken by Russell in February, 2001.  Please determine whether we can eliminate the Credit Support Annex from this agreement before we send another version.  You will note that this counterparty wants to rely entirely on the form used by Aron.  Russell has a copy of this agreement.

Do you want to put this on the legal credit list for follow up?

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           12/13/2000 02:01 PM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Phillip -- Is the value axis on Sheet 2 of the "socalprices" spread sheet
supposed to be in $?  If so, are they the right values (millions?) and where
did they come from?  I can't relate them to the Sheet 1 spread sheet.

As I told Mike, we will file this out-of-time tomorrow as a supplement to our
comments today along with a cover letter.  We have to fully understand the
charts and how they are constructed, and we ran out of time today.  It's much
better to file an out-of-time supplement to timely comments than to file the
whole thing late, particuarly since this is apparently on such a fast track.

Thanks.

	From:  Phillip K Allen                           12/13/2000 03:04 PM

To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
pallen@enron.com, pkaufma@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Attached  are two files that illustrate the following:

As prices rose, supply increased and demand decreased.  Now prices are
beginning to fall in response these market responses.


Hunter, thanks for agreeing to set up a meeting with Mark Rogers and Joseph Cheung of Petro-Canada.

Mark and Jospeh will be in Houston on May 17th @ 2:30 pm and would like to meet with some members of the central desk to discuss Chicago and MidWest fundamentals.

Could you please reply by e-mail  directly to Joseph and Mark with the location of the meeting and other details.

Thanks

Grant

Phone list :

Hunter Shively 		713-853-4772
Geoff Storey		713-853-7058

Joseph Cheung		403-296-5108
Mark Rogers		403-296-3759


The energy type for the following deals should be Firm Firm not Firm Caiso:

Jeff Richter/Chris Mallory
453306

Jeff Richter/Chris Mallory
453317

Jeff Richter/Chris Mallory
453307


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042418.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 18 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 18 / Preferred: -575.00 / Final: -574.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  TRADING_SC: NES1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 18 / Preferred: 125.69 / Final: 125.38)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 12:08 PM ---------------------------

Kimberly Bates
04/23/2001 11:42 AM
To:	Jennifer Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edie Leschber/HOU/ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gil Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladi Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tamara Carter/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Loocke/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris Ordway/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Wood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shanna Boudreaux/ENRON@enronXgate, Tricia Spence/HOU/ECT, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christina Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:	Jared's Happy Hour

Help us wish Jared well!!!!

Wednesday, April 25

at
Sambuca

910 Travis

4:30 p.m. - until

Please RSVP


your done-finally.  thanks for your patience.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Warren, Davette
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:32 PM
To:	Brasseaux, Ben
Cc:	Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	RE: Barry L. Tycholiz

This was completed just in case I did not send you an email.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brasseaux, Ben
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:18 PM
To:	Warren, Davette
Cc:	Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	Barry L. Tycholiz

Davette,

We need to credit Barry Tycholiz (P # 564185) with 40 hrs extra vacation time.  His offer letter said that he would receive an additional 40 hrs vacation.  He has not yet been credited with the extra hrs.  He should be receiving a total of 160 hrs vacation.  Please let me know when this has been completed.

Thanks,
Ben


Having fun yet?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/07/2001 04:45
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/10/2001 05:10:41 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'ben.f.jacoby@enron.com'" <ben.f.jacoby@enron.com>,
"'f_mitro@hotmail.com'" <f_mitro@hotmail.com>, "'fred.mitro@enron.com'"
<fred.mitro@enron.com>, "'kathleen.carnahan@enron.com'"
<kathleen.carnahan@enron.com>, "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Closing Checklist

 <<2RR404!.DOC>>

Kay:

An updated closing checklist for the ENA / SEL transaction is attached.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 129280v4

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2RR404!.DOC


Hey David:
Megan and I are thinking of moving and I wanted to know what you had done
with your place.  Give me a call when you get a chance.  Also, a person you
worked in the past now sits next to me - Michelle Parks.  Give me a call.
Hope all is well and lets talk about going up to the Vineyard the same time
this summer.  See ya
Ben


Thanks.  If you need to talk just page me at 888.916.7184.

Best,
Jeff


New Albany will accept proposal assuming my deductible is limited to $1
million per occurence and my BI deductible is limited to 30 days and includes
full replacement revenue (less marginal fuel costs) after the 30 day period.


We had a very successful meeting with investors last Thursday at Enron's
annual investor conference. The event was also webcast to individuals
worldwide, including analysts, investors and media.

A link to the replay of the webcast is available at www.enron.com.  A list of
the presentations that were made at the meeting will appear on the screen.
To view a presentation, simply click on the title.  The entire webcast is
about eight hours long, with each presentation lasting about 45 minutes to
one hour.  The webcast will be available 24 hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week
until Feb. 28.

This is an excellent opportunity for you to get the latest information about
Enron's business activities and strategy.  If you encounter problems
accessing the webcast, call 1-888-457-7469 for help.


Any time.  Let me know if you want to be added to our email list.  If you
have any feedback or questions, please call. - Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com [mailto:Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:49 PM
To: Niles, Ray [EQRE]
Subject:

Raymond:
I work at Enron, in our corporate development group and have been through
many different analyst reports.  I went through your previous "The Power
Curve" report and enjoyed it thoroughly and recently heard that the second
version is out and wanted to get a copy.  If that's possible that would be
great.  Thanks in advance for this request.
Ben Rogers
(713) 853-87998 Ph.
(713) 646-8863 Fax

 - The Power Curve II.pdf


A proposed Technical Corner Article on the work we did fitting the New York
area gas load data is attached for comment.

Bob Lee


Date: Thursday, February 7th , 2002

Location: ECS 06980

Orientation will be split into two sessions and divided by alpha-order. Sessions will run 10am-12 pm and 2pm- 4 pm.

We encourage all of you to attend your designated session as valuable information will be presented, and you will have the opportunity to get answers to your questions.

You can speed things up tommorrow by filing in the attached forms - alternatively you can complete them there

10am Session   Letters A- K

2pm Session Letters L-Z

PLEASE RSVP (BY REPLYING TO THIS E-MAIL) - IF YOU HAVEN'T DONE SO ALREADY


Here's the proposal to form the Team.

Note that the complete team list includes:

&The MRT will be led by Philippe Auclair, and will include Market Participant
Advisor (MPA),
Eric Woychik, Market Assessment Advisor (MAA), Steven Stoft, and any others
appointed by the
Board.

&The Market Design Group may be comprised of a number of national experts on
energy
market structure and regulation, and to be used as needed by the MRT. Severin
Borenstein,
Joe Bowering (PJM,s Market Monitor), William Hogan, Paul Joskow, and Frank
Wolak have all
expressed their willingness to assist the ISO Board through the Market Repair
Team.8

Does anybody have a read on Bowering from PJM?

Alan Comnes

Susan J Mara@ENRON
03/13/2001 03:06 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: You Can Put A Stake in Their Hearts but They Never Die

Gang,

Just heard from someone at the ISO that the ISO Board is shoving a new market
approach down the staff's throat.

Rising from the almost dead ...

This "Market Repair Committee" is supported by Eric Woychik, advisor to Board
Member Florio.  The Committee members are Joskow, Hogan, PJM people, et
cetera, et cetera.  There will be something posted on the ISO's web site
shortly.  It will be approved at the Board meeting Thursday.

I'll be there.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854


All,
	I attended the Market Issues Forum at the California ISO yesterday and wanted to inform you of an important upcoming change in Grid Management (GMC) rates.  Starting January 1st, 2002, the CAISO anticipates raising GMC charges significantly.  They cited the following reasons for this:  1.  An under collection of GMC for year 2001, this must be past on to the following year according to the tariff.  2.  The lack of credit for the CAISO, increasing interest charges, as well as creating an inability to issue bonds for capital projects.  They must raise 100% of any capital expenditures in the current fiscal year, rather then spreading out the cost over a number of years with a bond issuance.  3.  A decrease in overall market volumes.  GMC is allocated on a flat fee, per megawatt basis, so decreasing volumes results in decreasing collections.
	The CAISO points out their costs will remain flat from 2001 to 2002.  They anticipate volume levels next year similar to what current volumes are, thus reducing the amount of megawatts they can effectively spread out their GMC charges over.
	I have the following observations:  1.  Despite the decrease in volumes, and the decrease in overall market activity, the CAISO has no plans to reduce its current workforce of 500+ employees.  2.  When posed the question: Is CERS charged GMC for out of market energy?  Their answer was circumspect at best.   3.  The CAISO currently does not assess GMC charges to ancillary service volumes, they indicated however that they are strongly considering changing this policy to increase the denominator that they can spread out GMC.
	The CAISO would also like to point out that these increases are worse case scenarios, and may not be this high.  But as we are all aware, in the California energy market, the worst-case scenario ends up looking optimistic in comparison to what actually ends up happening.  Below is a detailing of the changes.

-Kit

Charge Code	Description	Current Rate	Proposed New Rate	Percentage Increase
521	Control Area Services Charge	$0.4060 	$0.5140 	27%
522	Inter-zonal Scheduling Charge	$0.2230 	$0.3080 	38%
523	Market Operations Charge	$0.9510 	$1.6080 	69%


I know we have not been treating storage correctly in Sitara.  I would like
to disscuss the best way to handle the CES storage.  It involves several
pipelines.  Who should I talk to?

On some storage contracts, ENA will buy the gas from CES on withdrawals and
sell the gas to CES on injections.

On other storage contracts, CES will give ENA a predetermined injection
schedule.  However, ENA will make the acutal injection and withdrawal
decisions.  Which means, what we bill CES will be different from what
actually happens.  I know this is what we did with BUG, I just don't know how
to do it.

Who do I need to meet with to discuss CES storage?


This looks ok from a right of way standpoint.

Roger Westbrook
Enron Transportation Services
Right of Way Dept.
(713) 646-7329 voice
(713) 646-7247 fax
roger.westbrook@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 9:02 AM
To:	Israni, Rakhi; Westbrook, Roger
Subject:	FW: FW: Bridgeline-Crawfish ROW agreement  My file ENR-091-1005

Attached are my Louisiana counsel's comments to our ROW form.  I agree with his changes.  Please review and let me know if you have any questions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"P. Keith Daigle" <pkdaigle@neosoft.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, November 24, 2001 2:30 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Re: FW: Bridgeline-Crawfish ROW agreement  My file ENR-091-1005

Gerald:

    I reviewed the enclosed agreement and made several revisions.  I am
enclosing a redlined version showing my revisions for your convenience.
 My major revisions are summarized as follows:

    1.  I changed all references to "rights of way" or "easement", to
"servitude" or "sevitude of right of use".  Louisiana law does not use
the terms "easement" or "right of way".

    2.  I rearranged the last three clauses in the 1st paragraph for
clarity.

    3.  I combined the content of the 5th paragraph into the 3d paragraph.

    4.  I change the 6th paragraph slightly to strengthen the rights
retained by Grantor.

    5.  I added language to paragraph 7 to give more detail to the
process of abandonment and to strengthen the rights of the Grantor upon
abandonment.

 Please call with any questions or if you need further help with this.
 Thank you for allowing me to provide professional advice on this matter.

Keith

Nemec, Gerald wrote:

>Keith,  Could you look at this form and scrub it for Louisiana law
>issues.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>From: 	Israni, Rakhi
>>Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:36 PM
>>To:	Nemec, Gerald
>>Subject:	Bridgeline-Crawfish ROW agreement
>>
>>
>>Gerald,
>>
>>Attached is a draft of the agreement for the ROWs requested by
>>Bridgeline.  Would you please look it over and make any necessary
>>changes?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Rakhi
>>x3-7871
>>
>>
>> <<Bridgeline easement ROW agmt.doc>>
>>
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
>**********************************************************************
>
> Bridgeline easement ROW agmt.doc
>
> Content-Description:
>
> Bridgeline easement ROW agmt.doc
> Content-Type:
>
> application/msword
> Content-Encoding:
>
> base64
>
>

 - ROW Agr #1A(Enron with my red-line).doc << File: ROW Agr #1A(Enron with my red-line).doc >>


Please see the latest versions of the EOL documents covering transportation.
We have made several changes since I gave you all copies this morning.
Please forward any comments to me and Gerald Nemec by the END OF THE DAY
TODAY so we can keep on schedule for testing.   Thanks for your cooperation.
---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
10:31 AM ---------------------------
To: Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron, Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron, Colleen
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revised GTC and Product Descrp.

Attached are redlines of the latest revisions.  Please let me know if you
have any questions.


This came from the PR Firm that our retail coalition, Alliance for Retail
Markets (ARM), hired.  In case you haven't seen info on this.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000 10:13 AM -----

	"Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>
	11/28/2000 05:14 PM

		 To: "Aaron Thomas (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>, "Andrea Weller
(E-mail)" <aweller@sel.com>, "andrew Chau (E-mail)" <anchau@shellus.com>,
"Bill Chen (E-mail)" <bchen@newenergy.com>, "Douglas Oglesby (E-mail)"
<doao@chevron.com>, "Jeffrey Hanson (E-mail)" <jeff.hanson@phaser.com>,
"jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail)" <jnnc@chevron.com>, "john Barthrop (E-mail)"
<jbarthrop@electric.com>, "John Leslie (E-mail)" <jleslie@luce.com>, "Joseph
Alamo (E-mail)" <jalamo@enron.com>, "Kathleen Magruder (E-mail)"
<kmagruder@newpower.com>, "Marcie Milner (E-mail)" <Marcie.Milner@enron.com>,
Michael Nelson <mnelson@electric.com>, "Mona Petrochko (E-mail)"
<mpetroch@enron.com>, "Peter Bray (E-mail)" <pbray@newpower.com>, "Rebecca
Schlanert (E-mail)" <rschlanert@electric.com>, "Richard Counihan (E-mail)"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Robert Morgan (E-mail)"
<rmorgan@newenergy.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)" <smara@enron.com>
		 cc: "Warner, Jami" <jami.warner@edelman.com>, "Allen, Stevan"
<stevan.allen@edelman.com>, "Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>,
"Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>
		 Subject: Harvey Rosenfield Press Conference Today

As you know, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights held a news
conference today at the Capitol regarding a potential ballot initiative on
electricity dereg. in 2002.   Megan Beiser, of Edelman's ARM team, attended
the conference.  Below you will find key comments that Megan pulled out of
Rosenfield's statement during the conference, as well as the official
document provided by the foundation during the conference.

  <<Rosenfield Press Conference Notes 11-28-00.doc>>  <<Statement of Harvey
Rosenfield 112800.doc>>

Tracy Fairchild
Account Supervisor
Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
(916) 442-2331
tracy.fairchild@edelman.com

 - Rosenfield Press Conference Notes 11-28-00.doc
 - Statement of Harvey Rosenfield 112800.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 07:27
AM ---------------------------

herve.duteil@americas.bnpparibas.com on 04/10/2001 07:20:32 AM
To: john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Henry Hub instead of NYMEX...

Hi John !

My mistake again early morning...  I clicked on Gas Daily Henry Hub (EOL
#1107435,    I buy 5,000 MMBtu/day  May @ 5.51)  instead of NYMEX.

Could you change it to NYMEX ?

Thank you and sorry again,

Herve

______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis
a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous
recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute
diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS
(et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message,
dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the
addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please
delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure,
either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS
(and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message
if modified.
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________


Your numbers look good. I had the wrong number in the volume we were pulling
from your pool.


http://www.consultrci.com

*********************************************************************
Miss last week? Catch up on the latest in the energy industry at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssuesWatch
*********************************************************************
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
at nspring@scientech.com or (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are
also available on our website.
*********************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, November 27, 2000
PG&E Co. Proposes Huge Rate Increase to Recover Debt
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

Last Wednesday, PG&E Co. proposed a five-year "rate stabilization plan"
that would allow the utility to pass along to customers more than $3 billion
in power costs incurred last summer. Under PG&E's plan, submitted to the
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for approval, average
residential
bills of $54.50 would increase to about $63.50 a month as of Jan. 1, 2001.
This amount is intended to accommodate potential wholesale price spikes
after an existing rate freeze ends by 2002. However, a portion of the increase
also would go to paying down the $3.4 billion in unforeseen charges that
PG&E insists are not the utility's responsibility.

ANALYSIS: Although most of the publicity related to the price spikes this
past summer focused on San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), the legacy of
the market problems in California is perhaps being carried by PG&E and
Southern California Edison (SCE), as both utilities have yet to fully enter
competitive markets within the state. This latest proposal from PG&E is
an attempt to save itself from what many have claimed will be financial
insolvency unless it can free itself from the staggering debt it currently
carries.

Let's first understand how PG&E found itself in the red, since this is
critical to the utility's argument that customers should be responsible
for the debt.  Due to its obligation to provide energy to customers in
its service territory, PG&E must its power on the wholesale market. In
addition, under California's restructuring mandates, PG&E had to buy its
power out of the Power Exchange (PX) rather than establishing bi-lateral
contracts with suppliers. The combination of low supply and high demand
drove up the wholesale cost of power in the PX this summer, which PG&E
faced as a buyer. Due to the retail rate freeze that is still in effect,
PG&E has been unable to pass on the high cost of power to its customers.
Although reports vary, on average PG&E has been paying up to 19 cents per
kilowatt hour on the wholesale market, when by law it is only allowed to
charge its customers on average 5 cents per kilowatt hour.  As a result
of these factors, PG&E has paid about $3.4 billion more to suppliers than
it can bill customers, and this amount is growing by hundreds of millions
each month. This explains the utility's motivation in wanting relief from
its debt, and also its argument that*since it was obligated to buy the
power for customers in the first place*its customers should ultimately
carry the burden for the high costs.

PG&E's rate freeze is scheduled to end March 31, 2002, at the very latest,
or sooner if it is determined that PG&E's stranded costs have been repaid,
something that utility executives say may already have taken place. Due
to higher-than-expected revenues and higher-than-market valuations of the
utility's assets, it may very well be the case that PG&E's stranded costs
are already paid off. Consequently, PG&E has been lobbying to the CPUC
for several months for various options that would all result in PG&E customers
picking up the $3.4 billion tab. The utility first proposed to retroactively
bill customers for the debt. This latest proposal changes the course a
bit to provide for a rate increase, but the end result would essentially
be the same.

Under the proposal, PG&E's rate freeze would end Jan. 1, 2001, and residential
and small business customers would begin paying 6.5 cents per kilowatt
hour for five years, compared with the current wholesale costs of 15.2
cents per kilowatt hour (generation costs). Without such a rate stabilization
plan in place, PG&E warns that an average monthly bill could soar to more
than $108 after the rate freeze is lifted. The utility also contends that
the portion of the new rate that goes toward paying for the summer's high
prices amounts to less than 20 percent of the total monthly increases.
To reduce the impact on low-income customers, the utility plans to increase
their discount to 25 percent from the 15 percent they currently receive.
PG&E said there would be further increases on an annual basis if rates
proved not to be high enough to cover costs. If the deficit of uncollected
costs grew by $1 billion, for example, then rates at the start of 2002
would rise by one cent a kilowatt hour or around 15 percent to 7.5 cents.

Skeptics*including some within the CPUC*say PG&E is simply looking to protect
its own interests. Carl Wood, a CPUC commissioner, referred to PG&E's proposal
as "volume two of their bailout request" and noted that the request results
in a rate increase for most customers and complete recovery of all of the
utility's debt. The consumer group TURN contends that PG&E, and not customers,
is obliged to eat the cost of the debt it incurred. The group also argues
that, although PG&E has cast its proposal under a guise of customer
protection,
the proposal only really serves to assure PG&E of full recovery of its
debt. In addition, TURN noted that PG&E submitted its proposal to the CPUC
on the day before Thanksgiving, conceivably to downplay media attention
and avert an immediate negative reaction from the CPUC.

PG&E remains adamant that its customers should be made to pay off its debt,
and is determined to go to court if the CPUC does not approve its proposal.
PG&E believes that federal law would supports its right to bill customers
for debt it believes it accrued on its customers' behalf.

PG&E's proposal comes at a time when the utility's reputation has taken
a beating. A current report from the San Francisco Chronicle reveals that
the CPUC received more than 17,000 complaints about PG&E from 1997 to 1999.
According to the report, PG&E received more than three times as many
complaints
per customer as SDG&E during the past three years, which is quite significant
considering that SDG&E customers were exposed to bills that increased by
two and three times their normal amounts last summer. The comparison between
PG&E and SDG&E was made because they are the only major private utilities
in the state to offer both electric and gas service.

PG&E also accounts for an unusually high percentage of complaints statewide.
From 1997 to 1999, PG&E complaints represented 56 percent of the total
filed with the CPUC, even though it only has 39 percent of gas customers
and 46 percent of electric customers served by regulated utilities in the
state. Nearly three out of four complaints filed with the PUC against PG&E
concerned billing problems. In its own defense, PG&E claims that it faces
a unique set of weather-related conditions that make the service it provides
to customers more fraught with problems, which consequently results in
more complaints.

It is unknown how state regulators will rule on PG&E's request, but prior
comments from Wood and other commissioners would indicate that the utility's
proposal will be rejected. This casts a dark shadow over the future of
PG&E as, without being able to bill customers for its debt, it is uncertain
how the utility will continue to remain financially solvent. Ironically,
unregulated subsidiaries under the parent company PG&E Corp. continue to
perform well and show profits. Yet, the huge debt of PG&E Co. may become
an overwhelming anchor around the parent company's neck in the very near
future.
==============================================================
SCIENTECH can help you find the answers you need. From simple questions
to complex problems, our experts and consultants will get results. Learn
more about our six service areas at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/About_RCI.html
==============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and type "remove" in the subject line.


Daren:
 Here is a list of some potential new volume (not on Vances list)

  Atmic-Hurta #1  10,000 MMbtu/d
  Royal Production-Wilson Unit #1  2-3,000 MMbtu/d

 Let me know if you need anything else,
  Susan Smith
  x 33321