Attention POWER REPORT Readers: Go to
http://www.powermarketers.com/prdaily.htm to view today's edition with direct
headline links to each story.]

======================================================================
The Industry's Preferred Source For Breaking Energy News And Information
http://www.powermarketers.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
T H E P O W E R M A R K E T E R S .C O M P O W E R R E P O R T

Today's Headlines From POWERMARKETERS.COM

Subscriptions to The PowerMarketers.com Power Report are free - you will
never be charged.

You may redistribute this e-mail without change. You may not redistribute
stories.

To register for a free subscription, point your browser to:
http://www.retailenergy.com/pma/dprreg.htm

************************************************************************

------Advertisement------

CRISIS AND OPPORTUNITY:  POWER MARKETS 2001
MARCH 14-16, 2001 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

The Power Marketing Association's 7th Annual Spring Meeting
>>>> Now Available: Exhibition Space and Sponsorships
http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agenda.pdf

************************************************************************
------Advertisement------

LOAD MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS
January 17-19, 2001 Las Vegas, NV
http://www.pmaconference.com/e-bro.pdf

TRANSCOs 2001
January 22-24, 2001 New Orleans, LA
http://www.pmaconference.com/Transcoa.pdf

THE ADVANCED PROJECT FINANCE COURSES
January 22-26, 2001, New York, NY
http://www.pmaconference.com/Advfin.1.22.pdf

************************************************************************

--------------------T O P S T O R I E S--------------------

Top Stories (January 11)

WASHINGTON CALIFORNIA POWER TALKS HUNG UP ON FORWARD-CONTRACT TERMS
White House-brokered talks to resolve California's electricity crisis were
hung up Wednesday on the terms of long-term power deals being negotiated
between the state's two largest utilities and generators, persons close to
the talks said.
http://199.97.97.79/IMDS%PMADJN0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/djn/2001/
01/11/eng-djn/eng-djn_010028_105_512227392755

OFFICIALS LOOK TO WHOLESALE POWER SUPPLIERS FOR HELP IN ENERGY CRISIS
Representatives of the Clinton administration, California Gov. Gray Davis'
office and California's biggest power companies continued to work yesterday
to solve the state's electricity crisis.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMAKRT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/knightri
dder/2001/01/11/krtbn/0000-0481-WT-ENERGY-CRISIS

TEXAS ELECTRIC UTILITIES SAY STATE ON TRACK WITH DEREGULATION
An association of Texas' largest electric utilities remains committed to the
state's plan to inject competition into Texas' $19 billion a year retail
power market.
http://199.97.97.79/IMDS%PMADJN0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/djn/2001/
01/11/eng-djn/eng-djn_140034_79_039338498842

PACIFICORP TO BUY, SELL WIND FARM ELECTRICITY
PacifiCorp announced Wednesday that it has agreed to purchase all the output
of a 450-turbine wind farm to be built southwest of Walla Walla straddling
the Oregon-Washington border.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/tricityh
erald/2001/01/11/eng-tricity_news/eng-tricity_news_061310_70_6640397640876

BRITISH ENERGY REGULATOR SEEKS TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON ELECTRICITY GENERATORS
Energy regulator Ofgem is considering introducing a market abuse condition
into electricity generators' licences just weeks after the Competition
Commission threw out a similar clause.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMAKRT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/knightri
dder/2001/01/11/krtbn/0000-0393-SU-ELECTRIC

----------------------------------------------------------------------
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Access stories online at:
http://199.97.97.79/IMDS|PMADJN0,PMADJN1,PMADJN2,PMADJN3,PMADJN4|index

Tauzin Realigns Commerce Committee; Eyes Energy Policy

Ameren Corp. Estimate -2:First Call Yr Net View $3.29/Shr

Puget Sound: Price Rise Covers Costs To Buy Gas Supplies

Puget Sound Unit To Raise Prices An Avg 19.4c/Therm

Puget Sound Energy: Wash. Agency OKs Gas Adjustment

Hearing Date Set For CalPX Request To Stay FERC Remedies

Ameren Corp. Estimate -3: Had Expected Yr Net $3.25-$3.35

AES Corp. Names Gluski CEO Of Gener S.A. Unit>AES

Amer Electric Power/Enron -2: Deal To Close In 2Q >AEP

Duke Energy Conf. Call -5: Doesn't See Seizure Possible

Amer Electric Power To Buy Houston Pipe Line From Enron

Entergy Mississippi Files $540M Debt Securities Shelf

Green Mtn Talks -2: To Resume When Fedl Mediator Calls

Ameren Corp. To Take $15M Chg, Or 11c/Shr In 4Q >AEE

Alliance RTO Cool To MW ISO Merger Despite FERC Comments

FERC Delays Enforcement On New England Capacity Charges

Duke Energy Conf. Call -4: 'There Is A Solution' -Exec

Green Mountain: Talks With Mediator Fail To End Strike

Green Mountain: No Further Talks Are Scheduled >GMP

Green Mountain: Union Still Rejects Co.'s Jan. 4 Offer

Green Mountain: Second Shift Is Major Point Of Contention

Duke Energy Conf. Call -3: Delay Payments Weeks, Not Mos

Northwest Cos Feel California Chill,Step Up Conservation

LADWP To Cut Pwr Sales To Cal-ISO Unless Paid In Cash

CORRECT:DOE Calif Pwr Order Expired Wed At Midnight PST

Gener Chile To Concentrate Investment On Chile Energy Mkt

PG&E CEO -2: Says Raising Rates In State's Interest >PCG

Texas Elec Utils Say State On Track With Deregulation

DOE Mulls Extending Calif Pwr Order As Demand Curbs Seen

PG&E Shares Down 8.8% Following Dividend Cut >EIX PCG

PG&E CEO Sees Bankruptcy By Feb. 1 Without Intervention

PG&E:2,200-MW Diablo Canyon 1&2 Seen At Full Power Thu

Revised Palo Verde Futures Vol. Jan. 10, 15

ABB Price Drop On CEO Comments Seen As A Buy Opportunity

Bell Canada Venezuela Unit $3.8M Bid Leads In WLL Auction

ABB's New CEO Launches Change Program, But Market Wary

ABB's CEO: Decision Made On US Listing, No Details Now

ABB CEO -2: Some Markets Not That Promising

ABB CEO Says Outlook For 2001 Revenues Mixed

ABB CEO: Some Costs From Mgmt Time Tied Up

ABB CEO: Some Costs, But No Charge From Revamp

REPEAT:HEW 2000 Sales Vol Jumps 70%; Pfts,Revenues Flat

ABB -5: To Present Results According To Old Structure

KBC/Electrabel Upgrade -2: Fallen To Attractive Levels

ABB -3: No Restructuring Costs To Be Incurred

ABB -2: Four Customer Units To Replace Present Structure

ABB Sets Organizational Realignment Around Customers

HEW 2000 Sales Vol Jumps 70%; Profits, Revenues Flat

Con Ed Says It May Have Rushed Indian Point 2 Restart

Wash. Calif Pwr Talks Hung Up On Forward-Contract Terms

FREE TRIAL: For a free trial of the Dow Jones Energy Service go to
www.dowjonesnews.com, and click "create account," or call
1-800-223-2274.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
N A T I O N A L
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Access stories online at: http://www.powermarketers.com/pma-nat.htm

01/11 Senate Asks For Hearing With Energy Secretary

Weekly Power Update

Calif. ISO: More Power Resources Helping to Avoid Outages

Epoch Maintains Power for California E-Businesses

Competition in Electric Market Urged Study Panel Chief Advocates Letting in
Out-of-State, Independent Companies

CGA Emergency Energy Conservation Program Continues As Cal-ISO Issues Stage 3
Emergency

Conn. Bank Seeks to Thrive Where Calif. Failed in Energy

01/11 NatGas Bubble To Burst In May: Energy Sec'y

Richardson Renews Calif. Power Order

Global Green USA Responds to Energy Crisis; Organization Joined by Cities in
Advocating An Environmentally And Economically Sound Blueprint for Energy
Reliability

Duke Energy North America's Call with Financial Analysts Available to Media

Mazda to release fuel cell-powered vehicle in 2005: president

Utilities Commission Confirms Puget Sound Energy Natural Gas Adjustment

Pacific Storms Intensify California Power Crisis

Top Energy Summaries - Thursday, January 11, 2001 - 4:54 PM

American Electric Power to Purchase Houston Pipe Line from Enron

Call-in Number Changed for Media Teleconferences; Power Reserve Level Remains
Dangerously Low Today

Bridge Update-Commodities: Natural Gas, Corn, Soybeans Sink

Ppl Energyplus And Pencon Enter Energy Services Agreement

A.I.M. Applauds Action on Power Fees

Wscc Power Market Analysis And Price Forecast Service Rapidly Changing
Competitive Advantages in the West

Duke Energy Working to Return Moss Landing Power Plant to Service

Energy Commission Offers Consumers a 'High Five' to Save Energy

Beaver Valley Power Station Posts Strong Performance

National Press Club: Expert to Address Electric Power Shortfalls, Regulation
Issues Contacts: Mark Stultz of The Electric Power Supply Association

World Energy Exchange Surpasses $30 Million in Energy Sales; New Milestone
Achieved in Less Than 45 Days After Launch of Wexch.Com Energy Transaction Hub

Top Energy Summaries - Thursday, January 11, 2001 - 2:02 PM

Natural Gas Prices Propel Bank of Montreal Commodity Price Index to Record
Level - Homeowners And Businesses Feeling The Bite

Duke Energy: Nuclear Stations Eclipse Company Records

U.S. Unit of Abb to Provide Tenaska Power Services CO. Energy Trading And
Management System for Texas Market

Genesis Energy L.P. Announces Quarterly Distribution

Repeats: Energy Volume And Open Interest Totals-Jan 11

Progress, Warning in State Energy Fight

Daniel Weintraub: Not Enough Power in Davis' Energy Proposals

Capital Team Nears Key Tests on Power-Making System

Modesto Council Passes Over Energy-Crisis Resolution

For California Tech Companies, ONSITE Power Could Mean Grid
Freedom"Electricity Crisis Need Not Drive Tech Industry Out of State," Says
Sure Power CEO

Stage Three Electrical Emergency Declared; No Rotating Blackouts at This
Time, But Outages May Be Imminent

NY Natural Gas: Sharply Lower on Warm Weather Forecasts

Top Energy Summaries - Thursday, January 11, 2001 - 12:03 PM

Duke Energy to Hold Conference Call Today at 2 P.M. ET

Energy Update/Los Angeles Department of Water And Power Daily Energy Update
for Thursday, Jan. 11, 2001

Dominion's Nuclear Units Set New Generation Record in 2000

Electrical Isolationism: An Ayatollah-Style Solution to California's Energy
Crisis

California's Mistakes Because the Golden State's Electricity Dilemma Isn't
Related to True Utility Deregulation, There's No Lesson There to Establish A
Connection with Georgia's Natural Gas Deregulation.

Washington Group Provides Engineering for Kinder Morgan Power Plants in
Arkansas And Michigan

Maine Gets Power Rate Hearing

Green Mountain Energy Company Brings Cleaner And Renewable Energy to
Connecticut CustomersNation's Leading "Green"

Energy Company Flips Switch on Connecticut Business And Introduces Innovative
Customer Rewards Program

Panda Energy to Construct $400 Million Power Plant in West Point; $2. Million
Added to Tax Base

Senior Citizens Unimpressed with Electricity Deregulation, According to Study
by Power Perceptions

Top Energy Summaries - Thursday, January 11, 2001 - :12 Am

Entergy to Hold Press Conference to Discuss High Utility Bill Solutions

Top Energy Summaries - Thursday, January 11, 2001 - 7:44 Am

H Power Narrows Loss

Power Fees Put on Hold

Pud, Businesses to Look at Energy-Saving Option

PacifiCorp to Buy, Sell Wind Farm Electricity

Epoch Internet Eases Concerns for Businesses During California's Power Crisis

Texas Ripe for Competition in Electric Industry; `Stay The Course' According
to New Study

High Natural Gas Prices Not Always a Drain

Potential Power Privatization Advisors Short-Listed

Natural Gas Cost to Go Up by 26%

Azcentral.com - California Power Talks Run On

Pinnacle West Rules Power-Unit Stake Out

California Governor Has New Role: Power Guy

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I N T E R N A T I O N A L
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Access stories online at: http://www.powermarketers.com/pma-intr.htm

US Energy Secretary Richardson due in Riyadh Saturday

Kenya Power And Lighting Company Recovers Sh16 Million

Enters Final Stage of Selection Process for San Cristobal Power Supplier

Greenvolt Power Apppoints Supervisor of Research And Development; New
Manufacturing Facility Being Prepared for Commercial Production of Alkaline
Fuel Cell Unit

Indian Government: Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources to Help
Lucknow Generate 5 Mw Power from Garbage

Indian Government: Power Minister Lays Foundation Stone for Ntpc`S Ramagundam
500 Mw Unit

Merger Sees Birth of Power Giant

Ebrd Mulls Over Russian Energy Plan

Nuclear Power Plant Use in S Korea Reaches Record High in 2000

Indonesia Begins Supplying Natural Gas to Singapore

Alstom Secures Power Contract

----------------------------------------------------------------------
KRT DAILY ENERGY NEWS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Access stories online at http://www.powermarketers.com/pma-krt.htm

Officials Look to Wholesale Power Suppliers for Help in Energy Crisis

Experts Say California Electricity Debacle Won't Happen in Washington-Area

North Carolina's Duke Energy, Piedmont Gas Consider Joint-Working Agreements

German Energy Group Lines Up Bid for United Kingdom's Powergen

British Energy Regulator Seeks to Impose Conditions on Electricity Generators

California Utility Can't Pay Stockholder Dividend, May Cut Off Natural Gas

California Democrats to Propose Legislation to Overhaul Electricity System

West Hollywood, Calif., Considers Forming Public Utility

California Consumers May Not Heed Governor's Call to Conserve More Energy

California Governor Announces Budget Proposal for Electricity Industry Rescue

Meeting Yields `Progress' in California Electricity Crisis

Scientists' Electricity Research Culminates in Final Testing in Davis, Calif.

California Electric-Utility Bankruptcies Could Lead to Blackouts

Philadelphia-Area Residents Face Higher Heat Bills

Colorado Economist Addresses Impact of Rising Energy Costs

Industry Shares Soar After Sale of Idaho Utility to Investor Giant

Correction: Industry Shares Soar After Sale of Iowa Utility to Investor Giant

The Orange County Register, Calif., Jonathan Lansner Column

Closure of Nuclear Fuel Plant Doesn't Deter More Waste Sanitation

Arkansas Ice Storm Cruel to Poorly-Maintained Electric Lines

Federal Energy Regulators Retreat on Electric Price Increase in Massachusetts

Two Officials at Utility Group Scottishpower to Step Down in July

California, Federal Officials Attempt to Prevent Utility Company Crisis

California Examines Policy Options Amid Energy Crisis

Hydropower Threatens Nation's Rivers

California Electricity Crisis Threatens Natural Gas Supplies

----------------------------------------------------------------------
REUTERS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Access stories online at: http://207.32.82.57/news/ElectricPower.html

UPDATE 2-Diablo Canyon plant hit by ocean swell delay

Calif. ISO declares stage 2 power emergency for Thurs.

Fitch may still cut Empire District Electric

S&P rates Tennessee Valley Authority bonds AAA

U.S. natural gas prices set record high in December

UPDATE 3-Talks try to map way out of Calif power mess

Ukraine aluminium plant sell-off stalled

UPDATE 1-Rain, winds batter California coast, knock out power

Mutual funds report exposure to Calif. utilities

Entergy Miss. files to sell mortgage bonds, debt securities

UPDATE 2-Calif. set to shut off power for up to 1.5 mln

UPDATE 1-California orders highest-level power emergency

Ameren to take Q4 charge, raises earnings estimate

UPDATE 1-Utility stocks suffer more losses in power crisis

Richardson sees possible delay in Calif power deal

Canada natgas tumbles on warm weather outlook

Power technology stocks rise on California concerns

UPDATE 1-Fed's Santomero-Calif. energy crisis a local problem

INTERVIEW-French power regulator wants prices to drop

UPDATE 1-Richardson says Calif power deal may take time

Portugal shares rise on telecoms, utility demand

UPDATE 1-U.S. deregulation spurs growth in energy services

UPDATE 1-PowerGen rated neutral, but bid hopes remain

UPDATE 2-NRC will not stop power rise at Indian Pt NY nuke

N.J. Sen. seeks hearings to review energy deregulation

World Bank blocks energy sector loan to Senegal

AEP buying 4,400-mile Texas pipeline from Enron

UPDATE 3-Diablo Canyon plant hit by ocean swell delay

PG&E utility unit to cut jobs, services to save $180 mln

UPDATE 1-US govt orders firms to sell electricity to Calif.

*********************************************************
NEW on the POWERMARKETERS.COM TRAINING PAGE
*********************************************************
Access all online presentations at: http://www.pmaconference.com

New! Now you can choose to stream the presentation immediately over the web,
or download it to your computer for later viewing-- Free!

New! Five additional RealVideo-based powerpoint-based presentations, with the
accompanying audio. Running about 30 minutes each, the new selections include:

ELECTRONIC TRADING. Power is following natural gas to become an
electronically-traded commodity. The products, the technology and the future
of electricity transactions. Kevin Sluder, Vice President, HoustonStreet
Exchange.

NUTS AND BOLTS OF RETAILING. What it takes to put an energy retailing
operation together-- the cash and credit requirements, back office,
information technology, staffing, marketing, sales and organizational
considerations. Andrew Serri, Vice President, AmerenEnergy Marketing.

RETAIL: WHAT WENT WRONG, HOW TO FIX IT. Retail electric deregulation has thus
far been an underwhelming success, but a great deal has been learned, and it
is eminently fixable. By Dr. John O'Brien, Principal, Skipping Stone

MANAGING BILLING. The complex requirements for managing billing and
commodities in the deregulating energy industry cannot be met with current
CIS and CRM technology. Energy Retailers must embrace the next evolution of
energy customer management (ECM) solutions. Paul Grey, Chief Technology
Officer, Peace Software.

THE INTERNET AND THE VELOCITY FACTOR. Greater price transparency, faster
execution, reduced transaction costs, increased number and frequency of
transactions and increased specialization are just some of the changes to
energy markets wrought by the web, and it's just beginning. Implecations of
the internet for energy markets. E. Russell "Rusty" Braziel, Chairman and
Director, Altra Energy Technologies.

Access all online presentations at: http://www.pmaconference.com

****************************************
THE PowerMarketers.com ENERGYYELLOWPAGES
****************************************
http://www.energyyellowpages.net

Where to go when you're looking for:
Billing Systems, Brokers, Call Centers, Coal Marketers, Computers &
Networks, Conference Houses, Energy Management, Engineering Services,
Environmental Services, Exchanges & Clearing Houses, Executive Search
Services, Financial Services, Gas Marketers, Information Services, Internet
Services, Legal Services, Management Consulting , Marketing, Meters, Power
Marketers, Powerplant Development, Powerplant Equipment, Risk Management,
Sales, Software, Trade Associations, Training, Weather Services and more!
Check it out today! http://www.energyyellowpages.net/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER NEWS & INFORMATION FEATURES ON POWERMARKETERS.COM
----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS NEXT-DAY POWERTRAX ELECTRIC PRICE INDEX:
Access online at: http://www.powermarketers.com/p-trax.htm

ELECTRICITY SPOT PRICES:
Access online at: http://www2.dtnergy.com/pma/btu.plx

ELECTRICITY FUTURES PRICES:
Access online at: http://www.dtn.com/dtnonline/dtnergy/pma/pma.quotes.cfm

NATURAL GAS FUTURES PRICES:
Access online at: http://www.dtn.com/dtnonline/dtnergy/pma/pma.gas.quotes.cfm

THE PowerMarketers.com JobSite:
Access online at: http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm
A daily visit to "The PMA Jobs Site" at
http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm connects you to a wealth of power
industry opportunities that could supercharge your career!
PMA ONLINE MAGAZINE: Access online at: http://www.retailenergy.com/pmamag.htm

News releases may be submitted to The PowerMarketers.com Power Report via
e-mail to news@powermarketers.com

Copyright 2000 by PowerMarketers.com: http://www.powermarketers.com/

The PowerMarketers.com Power Report is a complimentary service of The Power
Marketing Association. Headlines are copyrighted by their respective
services: Reuters, Knight-Ridder, and others.

Subscriptions to the PowerMarketers.com Power Report are free - you will
never be charged. You may redistribute this e-mail without change. You may
not redistribute stories. To register for a free subscription, point your
browser to: http://www.retailenergy.com/pma/dprreg.htm

TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE your subscription, (1) point your browser to "The
PMA OnLine Power Report" subscription services form at
http://www.retailenergy.com/pma/dprreg.htm

OR

(2) , send a message to pma@powermarketers.com. Include "unsubscribe" in the
subject and include your name and email address for confirmation.


Grant at El Passo  Electric said that the DC to AC converter on the Eddie County DC tie is unreliable.  Any time this summer when temperatures approach 100 we are going to have problems.  Be sure to check what the by-back schedules should be.  ....be aware

Linder


we bought 15000 contracts and our VAR didn't fall.  Something is wrong with the model

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Port, David
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:56 AM
To:	Beck, Sally
Cc:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW:

FYI - this is out there as a possible reason why Americas VaR did not come down to within limits as we expected.
In the absence of a fix it looks as though we have another VaR violation.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:36 AM
To:	Port, David
Subject:	FW:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:12 AM
To:	Reeves, Kathy
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Davenport, Lacrecia; Khanna, Bharat; Victorio, Tom
Subject:

Kathy,
It looks like the Canadian positions didn't hit VAR last night.  Can you re-check?
Also, I understand Zufferli bot a ton of NG and I thought he was short? (Why is system showing he is long?)

Frank

EFF_DT	PORTFOLIO_ID	COMMODITY_CD	SumOfDELTA_POSITION
11/23/2001	J_ZUFFERLI	NG	8241559.1328
11/26/2001	J_ZUFFERLI	NG	8568832.813

EFF_DT	PORTFOLIO_ID	COMMODITY_CD	SumOfDELTA_POSITION
11/23/2001	CANADA-PWR-BU	NG	8298324.949
11/26/2001	CANADA-PWR-BU	NG	8691997.5495

EFF_DT	PORTFOLIO_ID	COMMODITY_CD	SumOfDELTA_POSITION
11/23/2001	CANADA_PWR_GAS	NG	8298324.949
11/26/2001	CANADA_PWR_GAS	NG	8691997.5495


We have received the executed Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement from the
referenced CP dated 11/22/2000.  Copies will be distributed to legal and
credit.

This is an EEI Agreement.


missing deal for tom a

sell williams
260.00
25 mw
26th
pv
off peak


<<Exhibits To Enron South America Turbine blk.doc>>  <<Exhibits to Gas
Turbine Purchase Agreement - without notations.DOC>>

Attached please find both a clean and blackline of the Exhibits to the
Enron South America Turbine Agreement.

Please be aware of the following:

1. Exhibits B-1 and H-2 need to be added.

2. Does Exhibit F need to be updated and revised before signing?

3. In Section 3.1 of Exhibit K, the terms "Specific Date" and
"Recovery Schedule" are not defined.

4. For Exhibit T, please confirm that Enron has received all
documents that it should have received by now.

 - Exhibits To Enron South America Turbine blk.doc
 - Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - without notations.DOC


Click Here to see Barn Yard Fun!

Click Here To See Extreme Adult Farm Action

Girls Who Love Horses

Sluts who think dogs are GIRLS best friend

Click Here

This is a very graphic site Mature Audience ONLY

You MUST be at least 18 years old to enter

If you wish to unsubscribe, click here!


Thanks!

	Vince J Kaminski@ECT
	10/10/2000 05:06 PM

		 To: Jameika Smikle/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Erequest 3991

Aproved in both cases.

Vince Kaminski

From: Jameika Smikle@ENRON on 10/10/2000 04:19 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Erequest 3991

Peter Makkai is also requesting this access.

----- Forwarded by Jameika Smikle/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 04:19 PM -----

	Jameika Smikle
	10/10/2000 04:16 PM

		 To: Vince Kaminski
		 cc:
		 Subject: Erequest 3991

Stpehen Bennett is requesting Read/Write access to O:\research

Please advise.

Jameika
IRM


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041711.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  50.79 / Final:  50.76)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Hey Guz, just wanted to write and see how your Xmas was?  Mine was good
except that we missed Jason and Emiria over in Holland but we did get a
chance to talk to them.. they are having lots of fun and have been traveling
around Holland and Paris. Did you have to work on Xmas?  I hope not.  Just
wondering if you got my holiday card that I sent to you.  The only address I
had for you was your work one so hopefully it will make it up to you from
the mailroom or something.  I sent some pics in there so hopefully you get
it.  I was great seeing you and Burnsy a couple of weeks ago.  What is the
news on him?  Is he dating that girl that we went out with yet or is she
still living at her ex boyfriends house?
Ricky comes tomorrow and I am so excited.  Things between us have really
sparked again so we will see what happens when he is out here.  This is
always the make it or break it trip after two people have broken up and have
not seen each other.  I hope that things work out but if not everything
happens for a reason.  I am just really excited to see him and hang out.  we
are heading up to Tahoe to gamble on Friday and Sat and then come home on
Sunday to go to the city for new Year's.  It should be a good time but you
know what can happen when people gamble and drink so this will be
interesting!!!
Anyways, hope all is well!!1  Have fun working on New Year's I will be
thinking about you when you sit lonely in your cube!!!
Hahaha!!!Just kidding!!!
Lots of love, KIM

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Shirley,

Please, remind me about making arrangements for this trip later this week.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2000
09:40 AM ---------------------------

"Piazze, Thomas" <piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu> on 04/05/2000 02:47:10 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Test

Vince:  My schedule indicates that should be a good day to be on campus, so
let's plan for it.

Please forward to me those brief topic write-ups you promised so that I can
schedule appropriate faculty to meet with you.

Thanks.

TOM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 11:08 AM
> To: piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu
> Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
> Subject: RE: Test
>
>
> Tom,
>
> The conference in New York is held on  May 18 and May 19. I can visit
> Wharton
> the day before.
>
> Vince Kaminski
>
>
>
>
> "Piazze, Thomas" <piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu> on 04/05/2000 08:40:55 AM
>
> To:   "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: Test
>
>
> Vince:  I enjoyed talking with you yesterday and look forward to receiving
> information relative to your visit to campus.
>
> TOM PIAZZE
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Vince J Kaminski [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Tuesday, April 04, 2000 4:52 PM
> > To:     piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu
> > Subject:     Test
> >
> >
> >
> > Test
> >
>
>
>


I sent an e-mail to anthony campos on the 19th asking him to change the counterparty.  I don't have the access to do that.  If he can change the name, then we won't have to create a new deal and re-path.  I just sent him another message today.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schumack, Sherlyn
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:21 PM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	FW: Deal 93836

Daren,
Have you had a chance to look at this yet?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schumack, Sherlyn
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:50 AM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	FW: Deal 93836

Daren,
Will you let me know when this change has been made?  I need to get some payments finaled by 3pm tomorrow.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schumack, Sherlyn
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:08 PM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	RE: Deal 93836

Prior to 7/99  this was ENA not HPL, but there may be some issues on it as well for 3/99 to 6/99.  The deal ticket we used was 62717.  I will have to look further into the ENA activity because I know we still have some invoices that were paid under one company and we still have drafts under the other.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farmer, Daren J.
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Schumack, Sherlyn
Subject:	RE: Deal 93836

This ticket starts with 7/99 production.  How were all of the other months paid?

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schumack, Sherlyn
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	Deal 93836

Daren,

I am trying to get some payments out to Williams for old months 11/2000 and 1/2001 but global counterparty said this deal should have Black Marlin Pipeline Company Inc. instead of Black Marlin Pipeline Company effective 3/99.  The Black Marlin Pipeline Company was for an internal record (when it was an Enron entity).


Attached is a contact list for the PR Department and IR Department through the Thanksgiving weekend.


I am totally joking dude!  I appreciate your advice. The major thing is that
if I am spending most of my free time down there anyway, I might as well just
move there


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
12:09 PM ---------------------------
To: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Gas Transaction Confirmation

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Sean Breen" <sbreen@czn.com>                           01/11/2001
11:26 AM

To: "Chris Foster" <cfoster@enron.com>
cc: "Art Gelber" <agelber@gelbercorp.com>
Subject: Gas Transaction Confirmation

I understand that your system for disseminating  confirmations of gas
transactions relies on use of?a single address/fax  number.? In order to
accommodate Citizens' recordkeeping processes in this  regard, please fax
confirmations of?Flexible Pricing transactions  to:
??? Sean Breen
??? Citizens Arizona Gas  Division
????c/o Gelber & Associates
??? 1010 Lamar St, Suite  540
??? Houston, TX?  77002
??? FAX:???  713.655.1623
?
Personnel at Gelber & Associates will ensure  that the document is forwarded
to me for signature and return to Enron.?  Thank you for your cooperation in
this matter.? Please call if you have  questions.


Jeremy,

My pager number is 1-877-241-1059.  My home phone is 713-528-1997.

Please call me when the migration is finished.


BLOOMBERG

DEAL 566235
Bloomberg sent over a confirmation for a deal where:
Enron buys from Williams 25 mw 43-430 NP at $250.00

Should this deal 566235 price be $250 or $247.
Bloomberg has not sent over a confirmation for any deal at $247.00

PREBON
All deals checked out fine

AMEREX WEST
All deals checked out fine.


Has anyone talked with Tim B about what Larcamp said -- ie the soft cap only
applies to PX and ISO bids and not to any bilateral contracts including
bilateral fwd contracts?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/16/2000 06:12 AM -----

	Donna Fulton
	11/14/2000 09:33 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES
		 Subject: Re: Comments on FERC November 1 order

Just to pile on with the issues, I will add a few thoughts of my own for
issues that we might want to consider in our November 20 comments.
Re: the application of the price cap to only PX and ISO, Commissioner Massey
is not totally on board.  He specifically asked about capping the forward
market.  He raised the idea that he had gotten from the San Diego hearing
that there be an accepted forward contract for a specified timeframe (18-24
months) and specified rate, and that all loads must buy a minimum percentage
of their needs from this contract.
A staffer (Don Gelinas) asked whether the forward/bilateral market
(presumably uncapped) could take care of investment recovery so that
generation not be cancelled in California.
Dynegy and other marketers raised the issue of the test to be used by the
Commission in reviewing transactions above the soft cap.  Specifically, what
is opportunity cost?  As long as the test is not known until after the fact,
there will be lack of secuity selling into the California and greater
incentive to sell elsewhere.
Hobbs from Williams raised the possibility that if the Commission does not
eliminate the soft cap (his preferred approach), that the cap should be
temporary and escalating and there should be limited time for raising issues
and retaining the refund liability (he suggested that the refund liability be
only for one month).
Many, especially the utilities, raised their position that the Commission
should not institute penalties only on the load.  They claimed this was
one-sided and suggested if penalties were required, they needed to be applied
to the supply side as well.  They also argued that the load could not meet
the 5% test.
Massey had a concern at the end of the day that the Commission's
encouragement of forward contracts will be stymied by the CPUC by their
authority in reviewing prudence of the utilities' purchases.
Larcamp asked at the end of the day for information on the cost of generation
before deregulation - normalized for gas prices and emmission prices of
today.  The marketer on the panel added that we would need to include
stranded costs.
There was almost no support for the single price auction in California.
The California politicians argued that the ISO Board structure needed to be
changed, but that California had jurisdiction to change it, not FERC.  A
Court battle was threatened.

	Steven J Kean
	11/13/2000 08:51 AM

		 To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Comments on FERC November 1 order

There are a few other issues we need to look into:

Larcamp told Hartsoe and I after the meeting that FERC may clarify that the
price caps and reporting obligations apply only to bids into the PX and ISO
-- ie no bilateral transaction will be subject to the requirements.  He asked
if knowing this would change any of our views (esp peaking plants, though I
suspect it's already too late for that).  My gut reaction is that so long as
the market continues to clear through the centralized exchanges this
"exemption" for bilateral transactions won't matter much, but let's think it
through.  Is EOL or APX an alternative?
Massey specifically asked us to address forward markets in our comments.
Specifically, "has FERC done everything it can to encourage forward market
development?"  In addition to any other points we might make, I think we
should argue that "PJMing" the market won't facilitate and may even hinder
forward market development.  Also, we should advocate actions by FERC that
take away second-guessing by the CPUC in order to reduce utility fears about
contracting forward.
We have to give the Commission a way out on price caps.  We need to think
through whether there is something we can live with here, or we should take
the approach I took in my testimony:  FERC should encourage the state to
provide rate protection for selected customer classes by putting those
requirements up for bid (ie get the utility out of the commodity business as
much as possible).
Finally, on governence issues we should argue for a narrowe role for the ISO
as a way of diffusing the emotional governence debate.  Analogy:  if the ISO
is simply the air traffic controller all parties will simply be interested in
retaining the most technically competent people (not hiring or appointing
their lackies or friends).  So long as the ISO has a role in setting prices,
acquiring supplies or running the market, it is destined to be controversial
and highly politicized.  Those functions should be left to the market.

	Mary Hain@ECT
	11/10/2000 11:13 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments on FERC November 1 order

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 09:20 AM
---------------------------
________________________

To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Richard Sanders,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron,
jdasovic@ees.enron.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve
Kean, Richard Shapiro, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: carrrn@bracepatt.com, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com
From: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT
Date: 11/09/2000 05:19:03 PM
Subject: Comments on FERC November 1 order

For purposes of our discussions, Alan and I have put together an outline of
issues raised in the FERC meeting today that we might consider putting in our
comments to FERC.  Our written comments would also include the issues we have
already raised in our white paper and our oral comments at FERC.  Of course
to the extent we have discussed things in our white paper we could simply
cite the paper.  Given the potentially long list of issues to be addressed, I
haved left a voice mail asking Seabron if he is available to help Alan.


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000010209&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000010209
Request Create Date : 12/13/00 11:32:01 AM
Requested For       : telford.white@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Tom,

Deal 1098113  with Alcoa Inc.....Should the Volume for 11/1/2001- 3/31/2002 be 0 MMBtu/ day ?

Thanks,

Sean


Below is an update on the status of the grandfather legislation. Changes from
previous versions include a 30% reduction for oil and gas facilities instead
of 20% and an extension of the voluntary program until 9/2002 instead of
9/2001. I asked Skip Dees if that meant TNRCC would allow companies to
"authorize" grandfathered sources under old exemptions for a year longer and
his response is below. His suggestion is to act now (as is mine).

Skip's e-mail response: "If the Sunset Bill passes with the current
grandfathered facility language (and there is no guarantee of that - it ain't
gonna get any better, and it could get worse), we'd have till 9/1/02 to apply
for a VERP-type permit with
10-year old BACT.  The deal on applying historical PBR's to grandfathered
facilities is a TNRCC letter interpretation, and that COULD change at any
time.  If that option works for you, I'd jump on it NOW."

----- Forwarded by Marc Phillips/OTS/Enron on 05/10/2001 10:01 AM -----

	"Dees, Allan W (Skip)" <deesaw@texaco.com>
	05/10/2001 09:27 AM

		 To: "'Morphew, Cindy (TXOGA)'" <cmorphew@txoga.org>, "'Miksa, Mary (TABCC)'"
<mmiksa@tabcc.org>, "'Romero, Celina (Clark Thomas Winters)'" <cr1@ctw.com>,
"'jrandall@tnrcc.state.tx.us'" <jrandall@tnrcc.state.tx.us>,
"'jteib@trncc.state.tx.us'" <jteib@trncc.state.tx.us>, "'Mills, Alex
(NTOGA)'" <ntoga@wf.net>, "'Stevens, Bill (WCTOGA)'" <wectoga@camalott.com>,
"'Hughes, Wayne (PPROA)'" <pproa@pproa.org>, "'Burns, Morris (PBPA)'"
<pbpa@marshill.com>, "'Fleming, Martin (TIPRO)'" <mfleming@tipro.org>, "Wade,
Foster L" <wadefl@texaco.com>, "Abernathy, Linda (El Paso Natural Gas)"
<abernathyl@epenergy.com>, "Adamson, Terry (BP Amoco)" <adamsotj@bp.com>,
"Aliberti, Marilena (Shell Western E&P)" <mdaliberti@shellus.com>, "Anderson,
Lisa" <lisa@westcapitol.com>, "Blossom, Stanley (Kerr McGee)"
<sblossom@kmg.com>, "Braun-Fishman, Karla (Santa Fe Energy Res.)"
<kbraun@santafe-snyder.com>, "Broussard, Gweneyette (Equilon)"
<CGBROUSSARD@EQUILON.COM>, "Butler, Donald (Hunt Oil)"
<don.butler@huntoil.com>, "Cavazos, Hector (Chevron)" <heca@chevron.com>,
"Cortez, Naomi (El Paso Natural Gas)" <cortezn@epenergy.com>, "D'Attilio,
Wendy (El Paso Energy)" <dattiliow@epenergy.com>, "Davis, Frank (Anadarko)"
<frank_davis@anadarko.com>, "De Nicola, Mike (Chevron Pipeline)"
<MIJD@chevron.com>, "Dees, Allan W. (Skip)" <deesaw@texaco.com>, "Dorsey,
Gina (KinderMorgan)" <gina_dorsey@kindermorgan.com>, "Dougherty, Barbara
(Devon Energy)" <barbara.dougherty@dvn.com>, "Dover, Wilbur (Pioneer)"
<doverw@pioneernrc.com>, "Emery, Dave (Phillips)" <dtemery@ppco.com>, "Fish,
Marilyn (EOG Resources)" <mfish@eogresources.com>, "Frederick, Bubba (Spirit
Energy/UNOCAL)" <jfred@unocal.com>, "Galusky, Peter (Marathon)"
<lpgalusky@marathonoil.com>, "Garcia, Irene (ExxonMobil)"
<ceditg@upstream.xomcorp.com>, "Gillen, Darrell (Williams Prod)"
<darrell.gillen@williams.com>, "Golemon, R Kinnan (BMOH)"
<kgolemon@bmoh.com>, "Greer, John (KN Energy)" <john_greer@kne.com>,
"Gutierrez, Hugo A. (Marathon)" <hagutierrez@marathonoil.com>, "Hathaway,
David C. (Phillips Petroleum)" <dchatha@ppco.com>, "Hutson, Margaret
(Conoco)" <Margaret.B.Hutson@usa.conoco.com>, "Hutton, Nina (Cross Timbers
Oil Co.)" <nina_hutton@crosstimbers.com>, "Knoeller, Craig (Exxon)"
<craig.p.knoeller@exxon.com>, "Kriter, Kurt (Amerada Hess)"
<kkriter@hess.com>, "Landry-Huey, Traci (Phillips Petr.)" <tmlandr@ppco.com>,
"Laughlin, Jan (Phillips)" <jlaughl@ppco.com>, "LeBlanc, David J."
<lebladj@texaco.com>, "Maddox, Scott (Phillips Pipeline)" <sema@ppco.com>,
"Malter, Paul (Burlington)" <pmalter@br-inc.com>, "Mangels, Lynn D"
<mangelld@bp.com>, "Martinez, Rosemary (Amoco)" <martinr32@bp.com>, "McCay,
R. Scott" <mccayrs@texaco.com>, "Milliet, Michael P." <millimp@texaco.com>,
"Montgomery, Gene (OXY Permian)" <Gene_Montgomery@Oxy.com>, "Moore, Susan
(BP-Amoco)" <mooress1@bp.com>, "Muslih, Khalid (Coastal)"
<khalid.muslih@coastalcorp.com>, "Nolan, R. M. (Exxon)" <rmnolan@exxon.com>,
"Pachulski, Jim (Crescendo Resources)" <pachuljm@bp.com>, "Parra, Alvaro
(Williams Energy Services)" <alvaro.parra@williams.com>, "Phillips, Marc
(Enron Pipeline)" <mphilli@enron.com>, "Portz, Bruce (Western Gas Resources)"
<bportz@westerngas.com>, "Riddle, Mark (Hunt Petroleum)"
<mriddle@huntpetroleum.com>, "Sandilos, Bob (Chevron U.S.A.)"
<rjsa@chevron.com>, "Searle, Dave (Marathon)" <fdsearle@marathonoil.com>,
"Sebree, Ben (TXOGA)" <bsebree@txoga.org>, "Sellars, Don (Chevron)"
<drse@chevron.com>, "Sellers, Tom (Conoco)" <tom.sellers@usa.conoco.com>,
"Smith, Michael (Chevron)" <SMMB@chevron.com>, "Sorel, Kesner (Duke Energy)"
<ksorel@duke-energy.com>, "Starrett, Mike (Altura Energy)"
<mpstarrett@alturaenergy.com>, "Stephenson, Mark (Mitchell)"
<mstephsn@mitchellenergy.com>, "Templet, David (Mitchell)"
<dtemplet@mitchellenergy.com>, "Travis, Lynn (Devon Energy Corp)"
<Lynn.Travis@dvn.com>, "Wadsworth, David (Maxus Energy)"
<david_wadsworth@notes.maxus.com>, "Waisanen, Peggy (OXY Permian)"
<plwaisanen@alturaenergy.com>, "Wilhelm, Jack (Mobil Oil Corp)"
<jack_m_wilhelm@email.mobil.com>, "Wilson, Pamela (ExxonMobil)"
<Pamela.L.Wilson@exxon.com>, "Wolford, Cheryl (TEPPCO)"
<cwolford@teppco.com>, "Zygmunt, R. W. (Shell Offshore)"
<rwzygmunt@shellus.com>
		 cc: "Hall, Larry R" <halllr@texaco.com>, "Mire, Kerry A"
<mireka@texaco.com>, "Head, James A" <headja@texaco.com>, "Botes, Peter J"
<botespj@texaco.com>, "Turner, Kim A" <turneka@texaco.com>, "Hoover, Clay R"
<hoovecr@texaco.com>, "Smith, Todd M" <smithtm@texaco.com>, "Harvey, Ralph V"
<harverv@texaco.com>, "Dibble, John T" <DIBBLJT@texaco.com>, "Chisholm, Duane
N" <chishdn@texaco.com>, "Milliet, Michael P" <millimp@texaco.com>, "Boswell,
Jerry C" <boswejc@texaco.com>, "Lee, Arthur" <LEEA@texaco.com>, "Wenker,
Judith A" <wenkeja@texaco.com>, "Montgomery, Kathy A" <montgka@texaco.com>,
"Padon, Linda D" <padonld@texaco.com>, "Palmer, Frederick B"
<palmefb@texaco.com>, "Demeter, Rebecca M [Newcos]"
<RMDEMETER@MOTIVAENTERPRISES.COM>, "Demeter, Rebecca M. [Star]"
<DEMETRM@STARENT.COM>, "Wimberley, William F [Newcos]"
<WFWIMBERLEY@MOTIVAENTERPRISES.COM>, "Wimberley, William F. [Star]"
<WIMBEWF@STARENT.COM>, "'Thurman JR (James)'" <JRThurman@equiva.com>
		 Subject: Grandfathered Facilities - Endangered Species With No Prospects o f
Protection

The days of grandfathered facilities in Texas are numbered.  This does not
only mean those large facilities in nonattainment areas, but ANY facility
that was constructed prior to September, 1971 and has not subsequently been
rolled into some sort of new source review (NSR) permit or Permit by Rule
(formerly Standard Exemption).  Note that proposed new rules recently
published in the Texas Register for public comment will require operators to
be able to produce documentation of applicability and compliance for all
facilities authorized by a Permit by Rule/Standard Exemption, much the same
as is required for any other type of permit.

The TNRCC Sunset Bill contains language limiting the time that such
facilities may operate without NSR authorization of some sort.  The Senate
Committee Substitute (SCS) for HB 2912 is a little stricter than the version
passed by the House, but both versions did contain grandfathered facility
permitting provisions and it is safe to assume that the final version will
also.  If this version passes, you will have one additional year to apply
for a Voluntary Emissions Reduction Permit (VERP).  If your facility is a
pipeline facility, the TNRCC will require no more than a 30% reduction in
NOx, and that reduction can be averaged for several facilities in the same
area covered in one permit.

Note that it is only through the efforts of our lobbyists - particularly
Cindy Morphew of TxOGA and Celina Romero of ATINGP - that it looks as though
we will get an additional opportunity to get these facilities permitted
without having to use today's BACT.

This memo summarizes the SCS provisions for your information.  This is NOT
actual bill language - I've TRIED to make it easier to read.

Note that these provisions may be changed somewhat if the House does not
concur in all of the changes made by the Senate and the bill goes to
Conference.  In addition, we expect a strong attempt to amend the bill on
the Senate floor to require shutdown on September 1, 2001 of grandfathered
facilities that do not have a pending permit application.  If that attempt
is successful, the opportunity to apply for a VERP will be gone on September
1.

The memo also recaps previous recommendations to you regarding the current
opportunity to claim historical Permits by Rule (Standard Exemptions) as a
means of permitting a grandfathered facility.  I am not certain how long
this opportunity will continue to exist.  TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT WHILE YOU
CAN.

In addition, I've appended some information on 10-year old BACT for
gas-fired IC engines and turbines that might be useful if you are trying to
get a VERP now.

PROVISIONS OF SCS FOR HB 2912 (PRIOR TO SENATE FLOOR DEBATE)

Sec. 382.05181.  PERMIT REQUIRED.

(a)  Any grandfathered facility that does not have an application pending
for a new source review permit or other authorization, other than a federal
operating permit, and that has not submitted a notice of shutdown as
provided in Section 382.05182 may not emit air contaminants on or after:

 (1)  September 1, 2003, if the facility is located in a
nonattainment area; or

 (2)  September 1, 2005, if the facility is located in an attainment
area.

(b)  Any grandfathered facility that does not have a permit or other
authorization under this chapter, other than a federal operating permit
permit, may not emit air contaminants on or after:

 (1)  September 1, 2005, if the facility is located in a
nonattainment area; or

 (2)  September 1, 2007, if the facility is located in an attainment
area.

(c)  Facilities eligible for a Small Business Stationary Source Permit are
subject to the permitting deadlines in Section 382.05184.

Sec. 382.05182.  NOTICE OF SHUTDOWN.

(a)  A notice of shutdown to allow operation of a grandfathered facility
beyond the deadlines of 382.05181(a) must be filed with the commission
before the applicable deadline.

(b)  A notice under this section shall include:

  (1)  the date the facility intends to cease operating;

  (2)  an inventory of the type and amount of emissions that
will be eliminated when the facility ceases to operate; and

  (3)  any other necessary and relevant information the
commission by rule deems appropriate.

GENERAL PROVISIONS (APPLICABLE TO PERMITS UNDER 382.05183, 382.05184, AND
382.05186)

(a)  The commission shall grant a permit under this section if, from the
information available to the commission, including information presented at
any public hearing or through written comment, the commission finds that
there is no indication that the emissions from the facility will contravene
the intent of this chapter, including protection of the public's health and
physical property.

(b)  If the commission finds that the emissions from the facility will not
comply with Subsection (c), the commission may not grant the permit under
this section.

(c)  A person planning the modification of a facility previously permitted
under this section must comply with new source permitting requirements
before modifying.

(d)  The commission may adopt rules as necessary to implement and administer
this section.

(e)  If an applicant omits any relevant facts or submits incorrect
information in an application, the applicant shall submit the relevant facts
or correct the information no later than 60 days after discovering the
error.  If while processing the application, the commission determines that
additional information is necessary to evaluate or to take final action on
the application, the commission may request the information and set a
reasonable deadline for a response.  Failure to comply with the deadline for
the response will result in the application being returned to the applicant.

Sec. 382.05183.  EXISTING FACILITY PERMIT.

(a)  The owner or operator of a grandfathered facility may apply for a
permit to operate the facility under this section.

(b)  The commission shall grant a permit under this section if, from the
information available to the commission, including information presented at
any public hearing or through written comment, the commission finds that the
application:

  (1)  is filed before September 1, 2002 and the facility will
use an air pollution control method at least as effective as 10-year old
BACT; or

  (2)  is filed before the applicable deadline of 382.05181(a)
and the facility will use current BACT.

(c)  The commission may issue an existing facility flexible permit for some
or all of the grandfathered facilities at a site.  Permits issued under this
subsection shall follow the same permit issuance, modification, and renewal
procedures as existing facility permits.

Sec. 382.05184.  SMALL BUSINESS STATIONARY SOURCE PERMIT.

(a)  Grandfathered facilities that are located at a small business
stationary source and are not required by commission rule to submit an
annual emissions inventory report may apply for a permit under this section
before September 1, 2005.

(b)  Grandfathered facilities that are located at a small business
stationary source that does not have an application pending for a new source
review permit or other authorization, other than a federal operating permit,
and that has not submitted a notice of shutdown, may not emit air
contaminants on or after September 1, 2007.

Sec.  382.05185.  ELECTRIC GENERATING FACILITY PERMIT.

Special provisions for permitting grandfathered electric generating
facilities are not outlined in this memo.

Sec. 382.05186.  AUTHORIZATION FOR PIPELINE FACILITIES.

(a)  The commission by rule shall establish the procedures for applications
for grandfathered processing, treating, compression, or pumping facilities
connected to or part of a gathering or transmission pipeline.

(b)  Based on a prioritization by the commission as necessary to meet local,
regional, and statewide air quality needs related directly or indirectly to
federal air quality standards, the commission may require up to a 30%
reduction of the hourly emission rates of NOx and VOC from reciprocating
internal combustion engines subject to this section.  For facilities other
than reciprocating internal combustion engines that are connected to or part
of a gathering or transmission pipeline , the commission may consider
requiring hourly emissions rate reductions of up to 30% for NOx and 20% for
VOC.  The commission by rule may designate counties or regions of the state
where greater reductions in the hourly emission rate will be required than
in other areas, but no more than 30 percent reductions in the hourly rate
may be required in any area.

(c)  The commission shall:

  (1)  allow for a single permit for all facilities connected
to or part of a gathering or transmission pipeline;

  (2)  allow for required reductions for facilities under this
section to be achieved at one facility or averaged among more than one
facility and located in the same local, regional, or statewide areas
designated by the commission under Subsection (b);

  (3)  for purposes of emission averaging, allow emission
reductions achieved from grandfathered since September 1, 1997; and

  (4)  allow an owner or operator to apply for separate
permits under this section for discrete and separate facilities connected to
or part of a gathering or transmission pipeline.

(d)  Facilities authorized by this section shall be considered permitted
under this chapter.

CURRENT OPPORTUNITY TO CLAIM A PERMIT BY RULE TO "PERMIT" A GRANDFATHERED
FACILITY

TNRCC has interpreted its rules to allow operators to permit grandfathered
facilities using any applicable "Permit by Rule," including those previously
referred to as Standard Exemptions.

For instance, old Standard Exemption 7, effective May 8, 1972, was for "Gas
fired internal combustion engines of less than 2000 hp and engine trains of
less than 5000 hp total" and can be used to permit any such engine(s).  For
clarification on this particular exemption, the language used by staff in
proposing this exemption to the Texas Air Control Board in 1972 was as
follows:  "Engines smaller than 2000 hp are quite numerous and are not
considered a substantial source unless joined together IN SERIES (emphasis
added) to form an engine train.  Engine trains of less than 5000 hp are not
considered a substantial source.  Because control technology for NOx
emissions from internal combustion and gas fired engines is very limited, it
is doubtful if significant control could be achieved through the permit
system at this time."  ("Exemptions From Permits Procedures and
Justification for Exemptions," <signed> Charles R. Barden, P.E., Executive
Secretary, Texas Air Control Board, May 8, 1972.)

A list of the "Historical Standard Exemptions" is available on the TNRCC
Website at http://www.tnrcc.state.tx.us/air/nsr_permits/oldselist/index.html
<http://www.tnrcc.state.tx.us/air/nsr_permits/oldselist/index.html> .  In
applying these "Permits by Rule," be sure to check the corresponding
"Exemption Preambles" (if any) for any applicable General Conditions.

TNRCC has asked that we document such permitting of grandfathered facilities
by PI-8 AND a simple notification cover letter to them so that they will
have a record that the facilities have been permitted and are no longer
considered to be grandfathered.  The registration will buy you a letter of
acknowledgement that you have claimed the "permit by rule" (don't use the
term "exemption" in any correspondence) for these engines.

CORRESPONDENCE WITH TNRCC ON 10-YEAR OLD BACT FOR GAS ENGINES AND TURBINES

From: Celina Romero [cr1@ctw.com]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 1:52 PM
To: kgolemon@bmoh.com; rjohnson@bmoh.com; khalid.muslih@coastalcorp.com;
mphilli@enron.com; williamkendrick@enron.com; clowneys@epenergy.com;
jordand@epenergy.com; tom.palmer@gt.pge.com; BagleyW@kochind.com;
Howard0W@kochind.com; NickelD@kochind.com;
scott.wallace@mitchell-energy.com; greg_hardin@oxy.com; deesaw@texaco.com;
cmorphew@txoga.org
Cc: james.cantrell@gt.pge.com; natgasassn@yahoo.com
Subject: Response to 11/21/00 Teleconference 001204

I believe that we have now gotten the last bit of information that the TRNCC
will provide to us regarding the development of guidelines for 10-year BACT
for grandfathered engines and turbines for use in the VERP program.  The
last piece of information is an email that I am forwarding to you with this
email.  It is an email from John Steib to which he attaches an email from
Jim Linville.  In response to a request from us, Jim Linville sets forth in
his email an example of a large engine with emissions in the 29 gram per
horsepower hour range that cannot reduce emissions to the 2-8 gram level and
what the owner/operator of that engine must demonstrate in order to obtain a
VERP permit.
Remember, that in order to be included in the TNRCC's January 15, 2001
report to the legislature, a letter of intent or application for a VERP
should be filed with the TNRCC on or before next Thursday, December 7, 2000.
To summarize, we have obtained the following policies from the TNRCC:
1. Grandfathered internal combustion engines of less than 2000
horsepower can be authorized by Standard Exemption No. 6 effective December
1, 1972, regardless of the level of emissions from those facilities. (See my
letter to Kerry Drake dated September 15, 2000 and Drake's letter to me
dated October 3, 2000).
2. Grandfathered engine trains of less than 5000 horsepower, or a
portion of an engine train up to 5000 horsepower may be authorized under
Standard Exemption No. 6, December 1, 1972, so long as each engine in the
train does not exceed 2000 horsepower.  (See my letter to James Randall
dated November 1, 2000 and Randall's letter to me dated November 16, 2000).
3. Grandfathered turbines of less than 20,000 horsepower may be
authorized by Standard Exemption No. 82, dated December 1, 1972 regardless
of the level of emissions.  (See my letter to Kerry Drake dated September
15, 2000 and Drake's letter to me dated October 3, 2000).
4. Grandfathered engines and turbines that are able to be controlled to
the 2-8 gram range will not be subject to an economic reasonableness review.
(See James Randall's letter to me dated November 16, 2000).
5. Grandfathered engines and turbines that are not able to be
controlled to the 2-8 gram range may be permittable under a VERP if there is
test data to validate the old (pre-modification) and new (post-modification)
emission rates to document that verifiable reductions in actual emissions
would be achieved.  Also needed would be a representation of the cost of the
controls and even though additional modifications are available, the
additional cost is prohibitive. (See Jim Randall's letter to me dated
November 16, 2000 and the email attached hereto).

I hope all of this is helpful.  I have forwarded to you copies of the
referenced letters by fax on earlier dates.  If you need another copy please
let me know.
Celina

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Linville [mailto:JLINVILL@tnrcc.state.tx.us]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:36 PM
To: cr1@ctw.com; james.cantrell@gt.pge.com
Cc: James Randall
Subject: Response to 11/21/00 Teleconference

Celina and James,

During our teleconference today, you asked for an example of what we would
consider "significant emission reductions" that would be acceptable in a
case-by-case review when the 2 to 8 g/hp-hr NOx level could not be achieved.
A large 2-stroke engine that is currently emitting approximately 29 g/hp-hr
of NOx would be considered to have significant emissions reductions if
actual emissions are reduced by 50 percent even though it does not meet the
2 to 8 g/hp-hr NOx level.  We would agree that this would have been
considered BACT 10 years ago if there was test data to validate the old
(pre-modification) and new (post-modification) emission rates to document
that verifiable reductions in actual emissions would be achieved.  Also
needed in the case-by-case review would be a representation of what the cost
of the controls would be with a discussion of why the  2 to 8 g/hp-hr NOx
level could not be achieved.  This may be due to technical limitations such
as no additional controls or modifications are possible, or you may identify
cost in dollars per ton of NOx controlled to show that even though
additional modifications are available, the cost is prohibitive.

-----Original Message-----
From: Celina Romero [SMTP:cr1@ctw.com]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 9:45 AM
To: kgolemon@bmoh.com; khalid.muslih@coastalcorp.com; mphilli@enron.com;
williamkendrick@enron.com; jordand@epenergy.com; tom.palmer@gt.pge.com;
BagleyW@kochind.com; Howard0W@kochind.com; NickelD@kochind.com;
scott.wallace@mitchell-energy.com; greg_hardin@oxy.com; deesaw@texaco.com;
cmorphew@txoga.org
Cc: james.cantrell@gt.pge.com; natgasassn@yahoo.com
Subject: letter from TNRCC re 10-yr BACT

I received by fax late yesterday evening, a letter signed by John Steib re
10-yr BACT guidelines for engines and turbines for use in the VERP program.
After my first read, it looks pretty good.  Look for a copy of it by fax.
Let me know if you have any comments or concerns that we need to clear up
with the TNRCC.

Celina

November 16, 2000

Ms. Celina Romero
Attorney
Clark, Thomas & Winters
P.O. Box 1148
Austin, Texas  78767

Re: Permitting Grandfathered Internal Combustion
  Engines and Turbines

Dear Ms. Romero:

As discussed in our meetings and teleconferences concerning the options for
grandfathered internal combustion engines and turbines, we have agreed that
some of these facilities may qualify under Standard Exemption Nos. 6 or 82,
effective on December 1, 1972 and others may be permitted under 30 Texas
Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 116, Subchapter H:  Voluntary Emission
Reduction Permits (VERP).  Specific questions raised are discussed below.

You have asked for our understanding of what qualifies as an "engine train
of less than 5,000 hp." In your November 1, 2000 letter you gave two
examples of "engine trains" that you felt would meet Standard Exemption No.
6, "Gas fired internal combustion engines of less than 2000 hp and engine
trains of less than 5,000 hp total."  We agree that several engines, each
less than 2000 hp, can be combined into a "train" providing compression to a
common header so long as the train does not exceed 5,000 hp, meet the
exemption requirements.  In cases where the total horsepower in a train
exceeds 5,000 hp, we will allow exemption of individual engines within such
a train provided that each engine is less than 2000 hp and the total
horsepower of exempted engines in the train does not exceed 5,000 hp.  In
the same standard exemption list, turbines were covered by Standard
Exemption No. 82, "Gas turbines of less than 20,000 hp burning sweet natural
gas."

The other major point of discussion has been the determination of "10 year
old BACT" required by 30 TAC o116.811(3)(A).  As we discussed, our review of
permitting 10 years ago reveals that very few, if any, old engines were
permitted; so no data is available to show what we would have required for
nitrogen oxides (NOX) best available control technology (BACT).  New engines
were permitted at 2 grams/horsepower-hour (g/hp-hr) of NOX for both rich
burn and lean burn engines.  At that time older rich burn engines could have
been readily upgraded with catalytic converters to meet this 2 g/hp-hr limit
for NOX.  Lean burn engines were and are still more problematic as both
2-stroke and 4-stroke versions are available, and no single method of
control is applicable.  The large number of different engine manufacturers,
and the availability of various models, makes it impossible to establish a
single 10 year old BACT level.  Some of the older engines may be capable of
being upgraded to meet a level of NOX of 5 to 8 g/hp-hr, the level
established in the 1992 revision of Standard Exemption No. 6, which also
established a 3 g/hp-hr standard for turbines.  While the standard exemption
does not establish BACT for upgrades it does recognize what is available.
Many of the grandfathered engines are large and some have emissions as high
as 25 to 29 g/hp-hr, so significant emission reductions may be achievable
even if they are not able to reduce to the emissions control level of 2 to 8
g/hp-hr.  The 10 year old BACT review on these engines and turbines will
have to be done on a case-by-case basis just as we would have done 10 years
ago.

We hope this guidance will allow your members to decide which engines they
will be able to either exempt or permit under the VERP program and submit
their letters of intent to participate in the VERP program by December 7,
2000.

For engines and turbines that your members decide to propose for
authorization under Standard Exemption Nos. 6 and 82, please identify the
specific engines and turbines, identified by unit number, emission point
number (EPN), air quality account number, and plant name; and for each
account please submit a Form PI-7.  For each engine or turbine, please
submit a, Table 29 or 31 as applicable, and other technical information that
will support the standard exemption claim.

For engines that will be authorized by a VERP permit, please identify each
engine by unit number, EPN, air quality account number, and plant name, and
provide an estimate of the amount of emissions reductions anticipated as a
result of participation in the VERP program.  When the VERP applications are
submitted, information should be provided to show that NOX emissions will be
in the 2 to 8 g/hp-hr range.  If it is not possible to achieve this level of
emissions, please submit information that shows that it is not technically
feasible or economically reasonable to control NOX emissions to that level.
Information showing that actual emissions reductions will be achieved, even
when the targeted range of 2 to 8 g/hp-hr cannot be met, will be helpful in
staff review of the application.

We appreciate your assistance in helping us to make the VERP program a
success.  If you have any further questions, please contact Mr. James
Randall, P.E. at (512) 239-1078.

Sincerely,

John F. Steib, Jr., Director
Air Permits Division
Office of Permitting, Remediation & Registration
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

JS/JR/jo


Please see if you can get this to print so that I get all of the info.  I tried it 100 times on Friday and could only one page to print, which did not include all of the information.  Thanks.  NEED THIS TODAY.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heinrich, Brian
Sent:	Friday, May  4, 2001 5:27 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Cc:	Apollo, Beth
Subject:	Headcount for 1998 - 2001

Sally,
The attached file shows the detail of plan headcount for December 31, 1998 through 2001.  The only number that I still have a question about, is for EGM December 2001, the number I have in the file only represents the people moving into Networks from EGM (Brent's group).  I left a message with Tom Myers, to get the correct number.
I have also added the graphs that we discussed, which show increase in headcount along with increase in deal counts.
If you have any questions, let me know.
Thanks,
Brian


Casey has a list of all the East Power curves.   Frank - Stop re-inventing the wheel.   This stuff has been done already.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 1:41 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim; Zufferli, John; Lavorato, John
Cc:	White, Stacey W.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Gorny, Vladimir; Whalley, Greg
Subject:	Curves and Correlations

I have to clean up clustering and curve mappings from Estate to NETCO.  Last correlation update was Nov. 29th and I'm assuming we may have some issues.  The curves we are rolling into NETCO need to be highly accurate for the last 60 days to ensure variance covariance matrix is appropriate.  Please provide me list of curves we are using in NETCO.  Identify which curves should be primary and which curves can be secondary.  Additionally, please identify if there are any regional constraints that need to be "locked in" between primary and secondary curves.  I will then re-run correlations so we can properly understand diversification benefit across wholesale as it relates to proposed VAR limit structures.

Thanks,
Frank


Sorry, see 531726.

   Kate Symes                02/27/2001 12:50 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal No. 532726

I'm not finding anything in Enpower that matches that deal number. Is it
something else?

Rhonda L Denton
02/27/2001 10:43 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Monika Causholli/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Deal No. 532726

As you know, we do not have a contract with Transalta Energy Marketing Corp.
but with Transalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.  I am changing this deal to
that CP.

Let me know if you have any objections or if you prefer to make the change
yourself.  Do you want me to continue to let you know of these changes?  I
know Carla preferred to make the changes herself.


When you open the document, scroll down slowly to allow the pictures to pop
up.  It is ok to open in public...I think!
---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 03:07
PM ---------------------------

"Bythewood, Richard" <rbythewood@txi.com> on 01/24/2001 03:03:00 PM
To: "'Brad Baker'" <bbaker@mesh.net>, "Michael, Chris" <cmichael@txi.com>,
"'Dawn Wilson'" <Dawn.C.Kenne@enron.com>, "'Gary Wilson'"
<gary.wilson@oracle.com>, "Spindler, Jenny" <jspindler@txi.com>, "'John
Everett'" <john_b_everett@email.mobil.com>, "'Karen Hendrix'"
<karen.hendrix@biin.com>, "'Kristin and Darrell Herbel'" <KUAlums@aol.com>,
"'Shelly'" <rbwood@ix.netcom.com>, "'Tom Collier'" <tgcollier@msn.com>,
"'Wally Gomaa'" <wally.gomaa@gwl.com>
cc:

Subject: Things You Wish Your Computer Had

This is great!!

 - Thingsyo_.doc


i would sell my house and move on the boat.  i would probably buy a pet
alligator to keep on deck to protect my property.  golf this weekend if i
don't have sailing lessons.  they bagged me on the lessons last weekend.


We think the broker's right - can't read Mark's handwriting - but I can't
change the price until they're done with the calc - about 20 min. I'll let
you know.

Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/12/2001 02:55 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

but the broker has 207.50?

---------------------- Forwarded by Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron on 03/12/2001
04:56 PM ---------------------------

Kerri Thompson
03/12/2001 04:09 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

missing deals for mark

sell mirant
april
25 mw
207.50
pv

sell mirant
april
25 mw
205.00
pv


Friday, January 12, 2001

By the end of the day, the Treasury had decided to move forward and hold
another meeting with the CEOs, Governor Davis and various other Government
officials.  Governor Davis refused to come to California, so a video
conference was set up with two locations:  one at DOE in Washington and one
in Los Angeles for the Governor and his entourage.  It was tentatively set up
for 2:30 pm CST.  I have had no reports on the meeting yet. Ken Lay, Steve
Kean and Rick Shapiro attended for Enron.

Long-Term Forward Contracts

Good progress was made and the report was completed by 4 pm.  It includes a
draft RFO, draft standard contract, a table of utilties' needs, products
required and a timetable that would have power flowing by February 1.
Participants were fairly pessimistic about the eventual outcome, however,
given the absence of any buy-in or participation by the State of California.

Debt and Forebearance

Group also worked to have draft documents completed by COB Friday.

QF Contract Reformation

Parties continued discussion
No information was available by COB Friday.

Major Issues

State interest in resolving
State willingness to raise retail rates
Utilties' desire to offload all risk to the State as its portfolio manager
Willingness to "call off the dogs" for the suppliers and to release them from
legal action
State willingness to offer up sites for power plant development
Ability to reach deal on QF contract reformation

Next Steps

If definitive agreement is not reached by the principals at Saturday meeting,
this work ends immediately and utilities will likely file for bankruptcy the
week of Jan 15.

If agreement is reached, a massive amount of work is required immediately,
such as:
FERC filing of settlement and ISO Tariff change by Tuesday Jan 16.
RFO completion and release by Jan 18
Introduction and passage of necessary legislation to be executed by February
2.
Preparation of contract between utilities and state (probably DWR)
Preparation of formal agreements among the parties on the terms on this
settlement

And more...


Sheri has told me that you made an announcement recently.  Congratulations on
the baby!  I hope that you are feeling well.  I am so happy for you and your
husband.  My how your lives will change!!  But how enriched they will be.
Our three are so much fun.  I will also always be honest with expectant moms
and say that a new baby is an incredible amount of work as well and that it
sometimes takes a while to really enjoy the experience.   If you ever want
some funny stories about adjusting to being a first-time mom, just let me
know.  I would be glad to share my experience with you.  --Sally


Dave

Is there a round 2 of raptor and is Beau Canada going into it.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/20/2000 08:43 AM -----

	"EPADILL@pnm.com" <EPADILL
	09/19/2000 06:54 PM

		 To: "'jtunderh@srpnet.com'" <jtunderh@srpnet.com>, "'rstultin@apsc.com'"
<rstultin@apsc.com>, "'rsmith03@apsc.com'" <rsmith03@apsc.com>,
"'jwhitacr@epelectric.com'" <jwhitacr@epelectric.com>,
"'djensen@epelectric.com'" <djensen@epelectric.com>,
"'shoang@dwp.ci.la.ca.us'" <shoang@dwp.ci.la.ca.us>, "GWOLF@pnm.com"
<GWOLF@pnm.com>, "DHINES@pnm.com" <DHINES@pnm.com>, "'allenjw@sce.com'"
<allenjw@sce.com>, "'grfrere@srpnet.com'" <grfrere@srpnet.com>,
"'michael.d.lopez@sce.com'" <michael.d.lopez@sce.com>, "'amacfa@ladwp.com'"
<amacfa@ladwp.com>, "'shomer@scppa.org'" <shomer@scppa.org>,
"'skesler@apsc.com'" <skesler@apsc.com>, "'gordon.scott@nerc.com'"
<gordon.scott@nerc.com>, "Clark, Robert" <RCLARK@pnm.com>, "DFarmer@pnm.com"
<DFarmer@pnm.com>, "'don.benjamin@nerc.com'" <don.benjamin@nerc.com>,
"RFLYNN@pnm.com" <RFLYNN@pnm.com>, "THAMM@pnm.com" <THAMM@pnm.com>,
"'iliffandco@aol.com'" <iliffandco@aol.com>, "'skean@enron.com'"
<skean@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: SRP Change in Business Practice at Palo Verde

Please see attached letter, same subject -- signed, hard copy to follow.

 <<SRP Change.doc>>

 - SRP Change In Scheduling Practices_.doc


u can cancel.

	Joseph Alamo
	05/30/2001 04:56 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: itinerary for jeff dasovich 5jun travel

U R right.....yes, I do.....doh!

From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/30/2001 03:46 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: itinerary for jeff dasovich 5jun travel

u won't believe this (o yes u will).  karen just called and told me that the
event's been cancelled. but don't cancel anything until i get a chance to
talk to her live first.

thanks,
jeff

	Joseph Alamo
	05/30/2001 03:25 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: itinerary for jeff dasovich 5jun travel

Please review for ticketing! Thx, Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 05/30/2001 01:23
PM ---------------------------

Cynthia Biggs <cynthia.biggs@travelpark.com> on 05/30/2001 12:38:31 PM
To: "'joseph.alamo@enron.com'" <joseph.alamo@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: itinerary for jeff dasovich 5jun travel

                                          AGENT CB/CB BOOKING REF YHH3VH

                                          DASOVICH/JEFF
                                          ENRON CORP
                                          101 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1950
  ENRON CORP                              SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
                                          WN TKTLESS

  DATE:  MAY 30 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES TE 05JUN OAKLAND CA     BURBANK CA     940A    1040A
WN 318     Y          TUE   INTERNATIONAL
                            TERMINAL 2
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:00 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES TE 05JUN LOS ANGELES CA OAKLAND CA     300P    410P
WN 1114    Y          TUE   INTL           INTERNATIONAL
                            TERMINAL 1     TERMINAL 2
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:10 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300

MISCELLANEOUS         03OCT HOUSTON TX
                      WED   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

DASOVICH/JEFF  S0C0011R1000

*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
YOUR SOUTHWEST CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: 7DNQK5
********************************************************
PLEASE CHECK-IN 1 HOUR PRIOR TO DEPARTURE.
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES DOES NOT PRE-ASSIGN SEATS.
PLEASE PRESENT YOUR CONFIRMATION NUMBER UPON CHECK-IN
ND RETAIN YOUR SOUTHWEST AIRLINES PASSENGER RECEIPT
AND ITINERARY FOR EXPENSE REPORT PURPOSES.
YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO SHOW A PHOTO ID AT CHECK-IN
AND AT BAGGAGE CLAIM AREA TO RETRIEVE CHECKED BAGS.
*****************************************************
TICKET PRICE IS 201.50 ROUNDTRIP REFUNDABLE
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED


yeah, paincourtville, la.  i don't know where the fuck that is.


-----Original Message-----
From: jfogg@reliantenergy.com [mailto:jfogg@reliantenergy.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:05 AM
To: jfogg@reliantenergy.com
Subject: Re: REGT Capacity Report October 17

                    John A Fogg
                                         To:     John A Fogg/TTG/HouInd
                    10/17/01             cc:
                    07:57 AM             Subject:     REGT Capacity Report October 17

I am working out of the Shreveport office this morning till approximately
9:30.  Please call me at 318-429-3832 for any IT rates for tomorrow.  AOL
IM is also up at JAFOGG

For gas flow for Thursday October 18, REGT has the following IT capacity:

CGT                                0
Other Hub Delivery Points including TGT     10          Ruston Compressor
work cuts back on IT
Tetco Bald Knob                       50
Texas Gas Helena                      50
MRT Glendale                          10
Other Line AC points                        10
Williams Jane                         10
Carthage Delivery                     15
SBS injection space                   50           tomorrow in Dec out
SBS withdrawal space                        50          available for
withdrawal with Oct or longer payback
Backhaul to west                      50

Amber Station is flowing 353 Mdth east and Line 2 South is at 121 Mdth for
today.  REGT has lifted its operational alert limiting West of Amber
receipt capacity in order to give REGT some operational flexibility to
better handle system upsets.  However, be aware that REGT is not offering
any general interruptible transportation discounts from West of Amber to
east delivery points.  All IT will be priced at max rate, unless of
operational benefit to REGT.  REGT is still full along Line AD and is
approaching full levels at its Oklahoma storage faciltiies.  REGT is also
undergoing some work at its Ruston compressor station which affects storage
ability and the ability  to transport additional IT into the PVH.

MRT is taking its Unionville Storage field out of service for a couple of
days for maintainance.  During this time, REGT will be working with MRT to
balance service.  This will limit REGT storage space over the next few days
and may also limit IT at particular points.

Arkla is pulling over 300 Mdth with the cooler weather and peaked at over
600 Mdth/hr rate.  I do not have the power report.

Gas Prices     East  $2.375
          West  $2.290

REGT Fuel - currently 1.61% plus $0.0004/dth EPC - based on above
= $0.0386/dth.  REGT fuel will drop to 1.31 % on November 1.

I will be back in the Houston office on Thursday.

Thanks


Mark,

It was done in collaboration with John Sherriff.

Vince

From: Mark Palmer@ENRON on 11/10/2000 11:17 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Gadd/LON/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enron Case Studies

I'm not aware of a Sutton Bridge case study.  I'm checking with some other
folks and I'll let you all know what I find.

Mark


Special Thanksgiving Fare Sale
      Hurry! Purchase Tickets by Wednesday, November 21, 2001
      -------------------------------------------------------

US Airways is offering big discounts for travel during the Thanksgiving holiday period with fares as low as $98 roundtrip. These sale fares are available between most cities in the U.S. and between the U.S. and Canada or to many of our European destinations.  To take advantage of this offer, just book online at http://www.usairways.com/promotions/specials/thanksgiving_sale.htm no later than November 21, 2001.

- Travel may originate on November 22 or 23, 2001
- Return travel applies November 22, 23, 27, 28 or 29, 2001
- All travel must be completed by November 29, 2001
- Travel is not permitted November 24, 25 or 26, 2001
- See Sale Fare Requirements below for complete details.

Plus, earn double Dividend Miles on flights between now and December 15, 2001. Be sure to register for this offer before departure at http://www.usairways.com/dividendmiles/7437.htm or call 1-800-872-4738 and enter Bonus Request Number 7437.

This is just a sample of the sale fares offered.  For reservations and fares from your city go to http://www.usairways.com/promotions/specials/thanksgiving_sale.htm

Sample Markets				Roundtrip Sale Fares
--------------				--------------------
Atlanta - Pittsburgh				$138
Baltimore - Miami					$178
Boston - Indianapolis				$178
Boston - Manchester, UK				$270
Charlotte - London				$272
Charlotte - Montreal				$191
Los Angeles - Toronto				$256
New York La Guardia - Richmond		$118
Philadelphia - Denver				$208
Philadelphia - Toronto				$127
Raleigh/Durham - Charlotte			$ 98
San Francisco - Amsterdam			$357
Syracuse - Los Angeles				$258
Washington, DC - Charleston, SC		$138
Washington, DC - Brussels			$238

Depending upon your travel needs, alternative routings may be available at the same fares, with part of the service on regional aircraft operated by US Airways Express carriers Allegheny, Air Midwest, CCAIR, Chautauqua, Colgan, Mesa, Piedmont, PSA, Shuttle America or Trans States.

Sale Fare Requirements:
Fares are based on Coach travel. Roundtrip purchase required. Tickets must be purchased in advance of travel and within 24 hours of making reservation and no later than 11/21/01. Outbound travel applies 11/22-23/01. Return travel applies 11/22-23, 27-29/01. Travel is not permitted 11/24-26/01. All travel must be completed by 11/29/01. Tickets become nonrefundable 24 hours after making initial reservation, but under certain conditions may be changed for a minimum $100 fee ($150 for Europe). US and Canada fares do not include federal excise tax of $2.75, which will be imposed on each flight segment of the itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and a landing. Fares do not include up to $18 in airport passenger facility charges, imposed at time of departure, where applicable. Fares to Canada do not include a federal immigration fee of $6 per roundtrip or airport fees of $6.50 per roundtrip.
Fares to Europe do not include government imposed taxes/fees/surcharges of up to $97. Seats are limited or may be sold out during very busy travel times. Fares for Brussels apply from Reagan Washington National airport only. Lower fares may be available in these markets. Sale fares may not be available in all markets. Other conditions may apply. These fares are not available when purchasing by telephone through our Reservations Department.

This is a post-only mailing sent to kholst@ENRON.COM.  Please do not respond to this message. To change preferences or un-subscribe from this list, please visit the E-Savers enrollment page at http://www.usairways.com/esavers/enroll.htm

		Copyright US Airways 1996-2001.  All rights reserved.

	   US Airways World Wide Web address: http://www.usairways.com


I think that is exactly right.  I suspect that the marketing guys could work
up a simple formula for determining our course of action depending on the
size of the revenue opportunity vs. the power cost/penalty.  Thanks. df

From: Randy Rice on 12/15/2000 07:53 AM
Sent by: Randy Rice
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron
cc: Charlie Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Gallup Rebate

Drew, I plan to discuss this with Rich Jolly, and will call you with our
thoughts. I would suggest our plan be such that we do not just aoutomatically
shut down during these periods but work with marketing to create a cost vs.
benefit profile of when/if it may make sense to operate even when in a peak
state?
R2

	Drew Fossum
	12/14/2000 05:31 PM

		 To: James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Charlie
Graham/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Gallup Rebate

Randy, this is the issue I left you the voice mail on.  Article 6 of the
Gallup Compression Services Agreement (which I am sending to you separately)
with ECS obligates ECS to "work in good faith with CDEC" to establish an
automated system that would automatically have alerted us to peak loading
conditions on CDEC's system.  We had a pretty good idea when we signed the
contract that ECS would not be able to complete that by the contract start
date, so we negotiated a fall back plan under which ECS is obligated to
"assist [Transwestern] in developing a manual system to accomplish the same
result and will hold harmless and keep [Transwestern] whole for all cost and
expenses" associated with the manual system.  We will fight with them about
who owes the $200k that James mentions below based on their failure to
"assist" us in managing the cost.  In the mean time, we need to make sure
that we are doing everything we can to get a handle on the situation to
mitigate future costs.  Do we have someone who is watching this out there?
We are running so full tilt on TW that we may not have as much flexibiltiy to
manage this situation as we expected, but let me know what we can do.  James
had heard that one hold up was the absence of a confidentiality agreement--I
guess between ECS and Transwestern--that would permit ECS to communicate to
us the details on how to access teh key info. from CDEC.  That sounds like a
BS excuse from ECS, but it that's what they are saying, let me know and we
can figure out a solution.  Thanks.  DF

James Centilli
12/14/2000 02:49 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Randy
Rice/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Gallup Rebate

Would you please contact Gerald Nemec and review the Gallup Compression
Service Contract in respect to the Load Control Management.  My understanding
was that ECS was to provide a means to access CDEC's online profile in order
for us to make a decision to avoid running the compressor during CDEC's peak
load periods.  We have not received access to this information which has
resulted so far in additional electric cost of $200,987.33 for the period of
July through September.  Additional cost will be incurred for the remainder
of this year, that I have not been able to review yet.  This cost is
averaging $79,000 per month if we continue to run the compressor as we have
in August and September.


Tana:

Attached is a marked version of the FLAG/Enron, which changes FLAG has
agreed.  Please produce a clean version of the attached, put it on Enron
letterhead and provide to me so that I may arrange to have it signed by an
appropriate officer of ENW.

Please call if you have any further questions or comments.

Thank you,

Peter Feltman

Peter Feltman
Director
Enron Net Works
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: 713-345-4482
Cellular: 713-594-4009
Facsimile: 713-646-8583
E-Mail: peter.feltman@enron.com


Thanks for your help.


I think this is correct.  We will show it this way for now.  Can you verify
what were billed in demand for Oct please.  No rush.,
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 12:49
PM ---------------------------

Brenda H Fletcher
10/20/2000 10:32 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CGLF Contract 64937

Deal # 118000 - Your comments on the terms tabs was this was 1 year deal
which would end 9/30/2000.
I noticed that Jesse extended the date range to 2001.  Is this correct?

BF


24" and the 30" are split out from Monument junction to WT - 2.
                                                     Thanks
                                                       Bart


FirstEnergy Trading Services, Inc. merged into FirstEnergy Services Corp.
(Services) effective 12/31/2000.  Notice has been given that they are
assigning the Master Energy Purchase and Sale Agreement to Services.


This date change means that I won't be able to make it to the open house.  I will be out of town on April 27.


Thanks in advance for agreeing to speak at the Global Operations Controller
Forum.  Dress for the forum is casual, so feel free to do the same.  There
will be approximately 30 Enron business controllers present at the meeting.
All have responsibility for mid and back office operations for the following
Enron entities:  Enron North America, Enron Europe, Enron South America,
Enron Global Markets, Enron Industrial Markets, Enron Broadband Services and
Enron Energy Services.  Attendees will be here from Houston, Calgary, Tokyo,
Sydney, London and New York (metals business).

Attached for your reference is the agenda. There may be some slight changes
before the forum begins, but this will give you a good idea of the topics to
be covered and the other speakers who will address the group.

You and I talked about Monday or Tuesday afternoon, October 23 or 24.  I have
tentatively put you on the agenda over lunch on Tuesday as detailed below.
I hope that you can join us for lunch and address the group either before or
after you eat - your choice on that.  I will call Peggy to check on your
schedule, and if this does not work we can rearrange.

Date:  Tuesday, October 24, 2000
Time:  Noon
  (lunch will be served from 12:00 to 1:30)
Place:  The Warwick Hotel
  The Versailles Room - 12th Floor
  5701 Main Street
  Houston,  TX  77005

I have noted that your topic will be Technology's vision for supporting
global trading operations.  I know that the group would also like to hear
about what is going on in Enron Networks.  We can alter the topic as you
would like.
Let me know if you have any questions and thanks again for joining us.


Yesterday the Frontera plant was idle due to economics.   We had  submitted a Resource Plan (this indicates to Ercot what we plan to generate) with zero mw's and zero premium  because the unit was offline.   In the Resource Plan,  we can  attach a premium for OOM up or down.   In the plan for yesterday we indicated that our unit was "unavailable and offline".
   The plant personel are responsible for submitting an outage schedule with Ercot - this cannot be completed by the QSE.

Ercot called yesterday and asked if we could start the unit if they needed us to.   We called Jerry Watson (with Frontera) and he relayed that this was possible.   Ercot immediately OOM'd us up 135 mw's, beginning hour ending 13,  to control congestion.   They later upped this to 185 mw's for the remainder of the day, through 2400.
I called Mark Patterson, who is our Ercot Rep.,  and I explained the situation.   I wished to know how they could OOM us if we were offline.   I also wanted to know how this would settle.

His reply is as follows:

Since we indicated verbally that we could run the plant,  that changed our status from unavailable to available.
Since we had an implied low premium (zero)  on our plant,  we were high in the OOM stack and were called upon.
We would receive only the mcp for our power because we had no premium indicated.  The mcp was low all day ( mid teens)  yesterday.
If we had been OOM'd up and could not recover our startup & gen costs,  we could dispute the bill and provide sufficient documentation to recover, at most, our costs.

We immediately revised our Resource Plan and indicated 185 mw's available  with a $50 premium.    This invoked the Protocol provisions requiring them to pay us the 18 heat rate times gas costs.
The Protocol section dealing with OOM up payments is found under section 6.8.2.2.   Please review this to understand why this applies.

This was a very educational process.    We think that in revising our Resource Plan "on the fly"  we were able to turn a bad situation into a profitable day for Frontera.

Until further notice, the following policy should be implemented:

If Frontera is offline and Ercot calls to ask about the availability.    Say the unit is NOT available.

If Frontera is scheduled to run, need to input into the Resource Plan the following premiums:

$50 premium for OOM up.
$10 premium for OOM down.

These premiums will be added to the mcp and will be used to determine our place in the merit order.
If we are OOM'd up,   the premium will require that the heat rate formula is invoked.

If we are OOM'd down,  then we should be paid the mcp + premium.

Please call me if you have questions,

J. Forney
Director,  Enron Ercot Region
713-853-7160


Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 3;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011703.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


I am appalled at the lack of seriousness with which some of you have responded to this heartfelt message.  I, however, am already taking drugs (or will be again shortly) - (legal prescribed drugs, of course) and have no need for any such assistance.  I truly believe that Enron will rise again.  And I am content to work in the shadow of such great lawyers as Drew and Greg (if they had been higher up, this would never have happened!)  As you can see, I am still completely capable of performing all of my duties - particularly the suck up requirement (although I have felt that Louie was surpassing me in this role with his previous message).    As they say..."Get back to work!!!"

-----Original Message-----
From: Sellers, Emily
Sent: Mon 11/12/2001 3:59 PM
To: Bargainer, David K.; Brown, William E.; Cobden, Jan; Cones, Janet; Crowley, Philip; Dornan, Dari; Holtzman, Staci; Huber, Lee; King Jr., Frazier; Kyle, Candace; LaGesse, Denise; Mann, Ruth; McCoppin, Dorothy; Melton, Richard ; Pavlou, Maria; Porter, Gregory J.; Pryor, Tony; Raker, Colleen; Rapp, Bill; Ringblom, Kathy; Smith, Ann; Smith, Maxine; Soldano, Louis; Solon, Sharon; Talcott, Jim; Waser, Iris; Wilkie, Kim
Cc:
Subject: EAP

In view of all that has happened in the last week, our HR department asked Drew to send the attached message to everyone in his group:

As we all know, this has been a diffcult time for Enron.  It may be a difficult time for you and your family members as well.  Therefore, Enron would like to remind you that the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is available to provide you and your dependents with confidential access to a professional who can offer support and direction with personal or job-related issues.

        The EAP is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, by calling 713.853.6057 or 1.800.345.1391.  You may see some additional information about EAP at the following Intranet site: <http://hrweb.enron.com/employeeServices/workLife/resourcesReferrals.asp>