Calif. Senate Panel To Cite Reliant, Enron For Contempt
Dow Jones Energy Service, 07/19/01
Davis administration tells consultants to sell energy stocks
Associated Press Newswires, 07/19/01
INDIA: AES threatens to abandon Indian venture.
Reuters English News Service, 07/19/01
N Amer Pwr Highlights: Natural Gas Futures Drop Below $3
Dow Jones Energy Service, 07/19/01
FERC Agenda Eyes Tightening Of Pipeline Affiliate Rules
Dow Jones Energy Service, 07/19/

AES CEO Meeting Indian Power Minister on Dabhol, Paper Report
Bloomberg, 07/19/01

AES Corp. May Exit Indian Power Venture Over Past-Due Payments
Bloomberg, 07/19/01

Calif. Senate Panel To Cite Reliant, Enron For Contempt

07/19/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

(This article was originally published Wednesday.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- A California Senate committee Wednesday voted to
cite Reliant Energy (REI) with contempt because the company has refused to
provide documents for an investigation into wholesale electricity prices in
the state, said committee Chairman Joe Dunn, D-Santa Ana.
The committee also voted to forward a contempt charge for Enron Corp (ENE) to
the full Senate, where it will be voted on. If the charge is approved, the
Senate will vote on punishment, which could include hefty fines or
incarceration of executives.
Talks between Enron and committee attorneys Monday seemed to indicate the
company would agree to committee demands, but since then it has become clear
the company doesn't plan to comply, Dunn said.
"If you had asked two days ago I'd have said we are cautiously optimistic
about Enron. Now I'm pessimistic about it. We felt they were indicating to us
a willingness to do what the other generators were willing to do, but the
bottom line is that they are not, despite their cooperative-sounding words.
We are no closer to them coming into compliance than we were a week ago,"
Dunn said.
The Senate Select Committee to Investigate Market Manipulation is requesting
that Reliant and Enron provide 16 kinds of documents related to market
behavior, rent a depository for the documents, and sign the committee's
version of a confidentiality agreement. Both generators have refused to meet
those demands, Dunn said.
The committee will drop its contempt charges at any time before a full Senate
vote if either generator agrees to its requests.
A report detailing Enron's contempt charge will be sent to the full Senate on
Thursday for introduction, but is expected to be referred to the Senate Rules
Committee for review before a floor vote.
Dunn said he didn't know how long the report would be considered in the Rules
Committee, but he will "certainly push them to do it as soon as possible."
Enron spokesman Mark Palmer said the company "will continue to negotiate"
with the committee.
Legislators are scheduled to begin a monthlong break Friday, but aren't
certain that will happen because they still need to pass a budget bill and
are trying to approve a bill to rescue Edison International (EIX) unit
Southern California Edison before leaving.
Dunn said it would take a few days to prepare a report on Reliant's contempt
charge.
"We may not be able to forward that report to the Senate floor until the day
we get back from recess," Dunn said.
No one at Reliant could be immediately reached for comment.
The committee originally was poised to cite seven other electricity
generators for contempt, but all eventually agreed to provide the requested
information.
A Reliant spokesman said later that the company's main difference with the
committee centered on the signing of the confidentiality agreement. Reliant
would rather the committee secure a protective order before the company turns
over the requested documents, said spokesman Richard Wheatley.
"We respectfully decline to waive our objections, because we have a lot of
trade secrets and proprietary information at stake," he said.
When asked if the company would take legal action against the committee,
Wheatley said Reliant was "keeping all options open."
"But, really, we hope to work this out on an informal basis," Wheatley said.
"We don't think this is that big of a stumbling block."
Enron filed suit against the committee last week over objections to its
subpoena of certain financial documents, and said at hearings last week that
it may sue over its contempt charge as well.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 310-962-2843;
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Davis administration tells consultants to sell energy stocks

07/19/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

SACRAMENTO (AP) - The Davis administration on Wednesday told consultants
buying energy for the state to sell their stock holdings in energy companies
immediately or quit their jobs.
Nine consultants divested by a noon deadline, but critics said the order by
Gov. Gray Davis came months too late to protect the public's interest.
The order, issued at Davis' direction, was contained in a memo to Tom
Hannigan, director of the state Department of Water Resources. Legal Affairs
Secretary Barry Goode wrote that it was "imperative that you give instruction
immediately" to those concerned.
"We expect, and have always expected, the state's consultants to uphold the
highest ethical standards," the memo states. "That standard is not met by
those who hold a financial interest in one or more energy companies while
trading on behalf of the state on energy related matters.
Under pressure from Secretary of State Bill Jones, a Republican who hopes to
challenge Democrat Davis for re-election next year, the administration moved
to obtain statements of economic interest from the energy consultants. The
consultants were hired earlier this year to advise the Department of Water
Resources on electricity purchases for California's financially strapped
utilities.
The economic statements showed that several consultants held stock in energy
generators, including Calpine Corp. and Enron. One consultant reported he
sold stock holdings in Edison International and Dynegy when he began work for
the state.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

INDIA: AES threatens to abandon Indian venture.
By Himangshu Watts

07/19/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

NEW DELHI, July 19 (Reuters) - U.S. energy firm AES Corp may walk out of a
troubled distribution venture in eastern India due to a difficult regulatory
enivironment, the firm's CEO said on Thursday.
Dennis Bakke told reporters AES will sell its 51-percent stake in CESCO, a
distribution firm in the eastern province of Orissa, unless the firm was paid
its dues, allowed to raise tariffs and given a better operating environment.
"If satisfactory resolution of these matters is not expeditiously reached,
AES will be forced to abandon its commitment to the distribution company," he
said.
AES holds a 49 percent stake in Orissa Power Generation Corporation (OPGC),
which runs a 420-MW plant in the state and sells power to state-run Gridco, a
state-run transmission firm.
Bakke said Gridco owed OPGC about $45 million and the U.S. firm had filed for
arbitration in Orissa to recover the dues accumulated over two and a half
years.
He said GRIDCO was not paying OPGC, the generating company, saying that
CESCO, the distribution firm, owed it money.
"These are standalone businesses, and there is no basis for any such linkage
or offset," he said.
Bakke said the state's regulatory commission had ordered CESCO to transfer
all receivables collected into an escrow account, but the company could not
abide by the instruction as it needed money to pay its employees.
However, it complied after the local government initiated criminal
proceedings against the managing director of CESCO, he said. AES will deposit
all revenues into the escrow account.
"Hence funds will not be available to pay the 8,500 CESCO employees salaries
due July 31 and thereafter."
He said the regulatory regime in Orissa fixed tariffs at levels which did not
allow it to recover its costs.
Orissa officials were not immediately available for comment.
He said AES was considering selling its stake in CESCO but could enter into a
management contract in the transition period.
However, AES will look at other opportunities in India if it finds a better
regulatory environment.
Bakke said AES had not made any proposal to take over Enron Corp's troubled
Dabhol project but it was a "potential business" in which it might be
interested at some stage.
Apart from Enron, which has threatened to walk out of its $2.9-billion Indian
venture, U.S. firm, Cogentrix, and Electricite de France have also packed
their bags.
India, whose 100,000 MW generation capacity is 13 percent short of demand,
began power reforms in the early 1990s to attract foreign investment to
increase power availability to industry and almost 80,000 villages without
electricity.

N Amer Pwr Highlights: Natural Gas Futures Drop Below $3

07/19/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

General News *Nymex Natural Gas Futures Below $3/MMBTu For 1st Time In 15
Mo>r/nerc
*FERC Set To Act Wed On Calif Power Sales Refunds>r/wscc
*Calif. Senate Panel Cite Reliant, Enron For Contempt>R/WSCC
*Midwest Power-Grid Operator Mulls Plan To Span Regions>R/MAIN
*Ill. Officials: Midwest Generation's Emissions Are Normal>r/main
*Amer Elec Power 2Q Ongoing Earnings To Exceed Plan>r/nerc
*Calpine In 10-Yr Pact To Sell 100MW Power To Exelon>r/main
*FERC Agenda Eyes Tightening Of Pipeline Affiliate Rules>r/nerc

Nuclear News *NC 1,100-MW McGuire 2 Up To 60% Power; Rising>R/SERC
*Wis. 512-MW Pt Beach 1 Ramping Up To Full Power>R/MAIN
*Ill. 1,145-MW Byron 1;1,145-MW Byron 2 Up To 100%>R/MAIN
*Texas 1,150-MW Comanche Pk 2 In Start Up From Reactor Trip>R/ERCT
Fossil News *SD 110-MW Of New Pwr On Line; 240-MW Due Soon>R/MAPP
*Texas 500-MW PSEG,Panda Pwr Plant Began Commercial Ops>R/ERCT

Markets *Northeast Power: Prices Steady To Lower On Temps, Loads>R/maac
*Texas Power: Prices Fall As Nuclear Plant Returns To Grid>R/ERCT
*West Power: Daily Mkt Down On Sat Inclusion, Mild Fri Weather>R/WSCC
*Midwest Power: Prices Slide On Weak Natural Gas Prices>R/ECAR

FERC Agenda Eyes Tightening Of Pipeline Affiliate Rules
By Bryan Lee

07/19/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Federal energy regulators are scheduled to act next
week on new rules affecting natural gas pipeline affiliate dealings.
Sources say the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is debating action
at next Wednesday's open meeting to tighten up rules prohibiting pipelines
from providing market-sensitive information to marketing affiliates.
FERC rules allow monopoly pipeline companies to market natural gas in
competitive markets providing they adopt codes of conduct that prevent the
passing of information that provides a competitive advantage to their
gas-marketing affiliates.
Similar rules are in place on the electric side for vertically integrated
utilities with marketing units competing in wholesale power markets.
The changes under consideration stem from the commission's investigation of
El Paso Natural Gas Co.'s (EPG) controversial contract with a marketing
affiliate for pipeline capacity into California, according to sources.
The affiliate transaction has been blamed for California's dramatic runup in
natural gas prices over the past year, which contributed to the state's
unprecedentedly high electricity costs last year.
The proposed code-of-conduct changes also reflect the sweeping convergence
between the natural gas and power sectors in the years since FERC deregulated
the pipeline industry in the 1980s.
FERC's rules prohibit pipelines from sharing market-sensitive information
with their gas-marketing affiliates. But the rules don't address the
pipeline's power marketing affiliates. The commission is looking to expand
the code-of-conduct rules to address all marketing affiliates, sources said.
These sources say the template for the pending change can be found in the
conditions FERC imposed in a 1999 order authorizing the acquisition of
Pittsburgh-based Consolidated Natural Gas by Dominion Resources (D).
The commission approved the electricity-natural gas convergence merger,
contingent on Dominion agreeing to adopt codes of conduct applying equally to
its gas and power marketing affiliates.
The planned rule changes would apply to electric utilities with pipeline
investments, such as CMS Energy (CMS), Duke Energy (DUK) and American
Electric Power Co. (AEP). It is unclear how the changes would affect joint
operating agreements, such as the one between Entergy Corp. (ETR) and
privately held Koch Industries.
But the largest impact will be for large pipeline companies with extensive
power marketing operations and investments in power plants.
For example, El Paso, Williams Cos. (WMB) and Enron Corp. (ENE), represent
about 70% of the interstate pipeline industry and are among the nation's top
power marketers and merchant power plant developers.
One FERC source described the order scheduled for commission vote next week
as "a work in progress," while another said the matter is in such a state of
flux that "it might not be safe to write anything yet."

-By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6647; Bryan.Lee@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

AES CEO Meeting Indian Power Minister on Dabhol, Paper Reports
2001-07-19 02:00 (New York)
 New Delhi, July 19 (Bloomberg) -- AES Corp. Chief Executive
Dennis Bakke will likely discuss taking over Enron Corp.'s Dabhol
Power Co. when he meets India's power minister Suresh Prabhu
today, Business Standard said, without citing officials.
     Dabhol, 65 percent owned by Enron, and Maharashtra State
Electricity Board, its only customer, have been quarrelling for
seven months over unpaid bills. The board has stopped
buying power from Dabhol and construction work on the $3 billion
plant was halted last month after lenders stopped funding it.
     Bakke will also likely discuss AES's own payment problems at
its 49 percent owned Orissa Power Generation Co. in eastern Orissa
state, the paper said. AES is struggling to recover 2.1 billion
rupees ($44 million) owed it by the state-run transmission
company, the Business Standard reported earlier.
     Bakke is also likely to meet India's Finance Minister
Yashwant Sinha, the paper said.
--Ravil Shirodkar in the New Delhi newsroom (91 11) 334 8812, or
at rshirodkar@bloomberg.net /rb
Story illustration: To graph the shares of Enron Corp, click
ES Corp. May Exit Indian Power Venture Over Past-Due Payments
2001-07-19 15:35 (New York)

AES Corp. May Exit Indian Power Venture Over Past-Due Payments
  New Delhi, July 19 (Bloomberg) -- AES Corp., the biggest U.S.
power company, said it may withdraw from a power distribution
venture in India's eastern Orissa state because of unpaid bills.
     AES, which runs a 420-megawatt power plant in Orissa, is owed
$44 million by the state-run transmission company, of which the
U.S. company owns 49 percent. AES Chief Executive Dennis Bakke met
with India's power minister Suresh Prabhu in New Delhi today.
     ``We have to take such drastic steps when we don't get
paid,'' said Sandra Ross, an official in AES's investor relations
department in Arlington, Virginia. ``These issues have to get
resolved.''
     AES is the latest in a series of overseas power companies
that have faced payment problems or withdrawn investment from the
country citing delays, bureaucracy and the slow pace of reforms.
India says it needs $200 billion to double the nation's generating
capacity and avoid power failures that last year swept across much
of northern India. Blackouts are common in many Indian cities.
     ``AES will be forced to abandon its commitment to the
distribution company'' if the past-due bills aren't paid, AES's
Bakke said on Star TV, broadcast in India today. He said AES is
filing for arbitration of the dispute.

                               Enron

     Enron Corp.'s Dabhol Power Co. and a state electricity board
in India's western state of Maharashtra have been quarrelling for
seven months over $64 million of unpaid bills. The board, Dahbol's
sole customer, stopped buying power from the unit, saying it's too
expensive. Construction of the $3 billion plant's second phase
stopped last month after lenders cut funding.
     Four other foreign power companies, including Electricite de
France, Europe's largest, have pulled out of Indian power projects
worth $3 billion.
     ``We're not happy with the way things are,'' said AES's Ross.
``In the future, if payments resume, we could buy it back.''
     Arlington, Virginia-based AES owns stakes in 173 power plants
generating 59,000 megawatts worldwide, including utilities in the
U.S. and Latin America.
     AES owns 49 percent of the Orissa Power Generation Co. that
supplies 600,000 customers in eastern India.
     AES shares rose as much as $1.37, or 3.8 percent, to $37.80.

--Ravil Shirodkar and Anindya Mukherjee in the New Delhi newsroom
(91 11) 334 8812, or at rshirodkar@bloomberg.net /rb


Danetta worked it for the  Fountain Valley project.  How long has she been
here?  I didn't know there was anyone other than you.

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/02/2001 02:24:25 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Kay, unless I've lost my mind, I've never seen these docs before.  What deal
was it on.  I don't have anything on CA Development.  I don't remember
executing any attorney's opinions?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 2:47 PM
To: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Subject: RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Yes, this stuff is for the purchaser's bank.

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/02/2001 01:45:44
PM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Kay:  Is there anything different from the forms you and I worked on
earlier.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:32 PM
To: danetta.beaushaw@ps.ge.com
Cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com; lee.johnson@ps.ge.com;
Stephen.Thome@enron.com
Subject: Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Hi Danetta,

I heard a rumor that you are the one to look at this stuff.  I know that
you recently went through the process in connection with the Fountain
Valley transaction.  I'm happy to serve up those forms to Freshfields if
that makes it is easier for you.

My number is 713 345 7566.

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001 12:27
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
04/02/2001 10:09 AM

To:   kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc:   lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com

Subject:  Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

Hi Kent,

I don't know whether Lee has mentioned the Delta Power deal that we are
working on.  We are taking 4 turbines and putting them in an LLC, and
selling some of the interest in the LLC to Delta Power.  Three of the
turbines are turbines formerally known as LV Co Gen turbines, and we are
buying new LM's to replace the ones we are using here.  In any event, Delta
Power is financing the deal, and they have asked that we get GE sign off on
the attached documents.  Therefore, I would be interested in your response
to the attached.

I understand that Lee is in New Orleans today, but I'll send him a copy
anyway.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/02/2001 10:05
AM ---------------------------

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/01/2001 05:10:38 PM

To:   "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "John Keffer
      (E-mail)" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
      <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Rick Vicens (E-mail)"
      <rvicens@deltapower.com>, "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)"
      <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>
cc:   "BURKE, Ted (TDB)" <ted.burke@freshfields.com>

Subject:  Enron/Delta Turbine Acquisition

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify
us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your
system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its
contents to any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.
Thank you for your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email
ITHelp@freshfields.com if you need assistance.

As discussed during our call earlier this afternoon, please find attached
for onward transmission to GE a draft of (i) the GE Consent and Agreement
and (ii) the GE legal opinion.

Kind regards
Isabel

(See attached file: NY003700033.DOC)
(See attached file: NY003699615.DOC)


graduand (GRAJ-oo-and) noun

   A student who is about to graduate or receive a degree.

[From Middle Latin graduandus, gerundive of graduare to graduate.]

   "Speaking at the convocation ceremony of 481 graduands of the college in
   Kuala Lumpur yesterday, Dr Ling said Malaysia's rapid economic growth in
   the last decade has generated a demand for skilled manpower which has
   exceeded supply."
   Knowledge a life-long quest, Business Times Malaysia, Aug 2, 1997.

This week's theme: words from the world of learning and the learned.

.............................................................................
It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. -Voltaire
(1694-1778)

What to give to the person who has everything? Give the gift of words.
Here is a gift that keeps on giving. To enter a gift subscription of
A.Word.A.Day, please visit http://wordsmith.org/awad/gift.html
To subscribe yourself, use http://wordsmith.org/awad/subscribe.html

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/graduand.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/graduand.ram


Coverage for June 9th & 10th for CNG/IROQ & CGAS:

Joann Collins
pg	888-515-0415
hm	281-920-2830
wk	713-856-5610

Thank You and have a GREAT weekend!!!
Joann


This message is intended for eHRonline users only.

Due to a recent change to eHRonline, the URL (aka "Web address") for
accessing eHRonline needs to be changed on your computer.  The change
involves adding the letter "s" to the "http" reference in the URL.  The URL
for accessing eHRonline should be:   https://eHRonline.enron.com.

This change should be made by those who have added the URL as a favorite on
the browser.


Jeff has both sides of both deals in the system correctly. Here are the deal
numbers.

461029
Williams
115.00

461030
EES
114.95

461801
Mieco
115.00

461802
EES
114.95

And Deal #461139 was actually a Short Term Southwest deal done by Tom Alonso
with Williams for the same price on the same days, but with Prebon.
Confusion!

Hope this fixes it.


Shelley Corman
	09/07/2000 05:34 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Margaret
Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Message Points on Higher Gas Prices

I anticipate that GPG management will be asked at several upcoming industry
meetings to comment on the reasons for and implications of rising natural gas
prices.  Attached is a  proposed set of talking points for use in Q&A and
briefing materials.    Please let me know if you find these message points to
be consistent with our general Enron response to pricing inquiries.


Please give me an update so we can get this done.  Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

Robert Pickel <RPICKEL@isda.org> on 01/06/2000 05:19:26 PM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Corrinne Greasley <CGREASLEY@isda.org>
Subject: Energy Supplement

Mark:

Happy new year. I hope your new year was eventful on the personal side and
uneventful on the business side.

As you will have seen from my e-mail earlier this week, we are very close to
final on the Supplement. We just have a couple of firms to hear from and we
are chasing them down. One of those is Enron, which you recall took on the
responsibility for the various commodities that no one else volunteered for
(benzene & methanol). Can you check up on the status of the review?

Thanks.

Bob


T-shirt size:  X-large.

Suzanne Adams
05/13/99 03:54 PM
To: Alan B Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gareth Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie
Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Jordan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristina
Mordaunt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-ECT
Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen W Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan -ECT Legal-
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del
Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ronald W Haggerty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Pedigo/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn
III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb
Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT,
Susanne Lindgren/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ECT LEGAL CONFERENCE

PLEASE MARK YOUR CALENDARS FOR OCTOBER 28-29, 1999 FOR THE ECT LEGAL
CONFERENCE.

PLEASE FORWARD YOUR T-SHIRT SIZE TO ME VIA EMAIL.  THANKS, SUZANNE


Attached is the management Report for Feb 24, 2000.

External Trading

 Total  24-Feb-00  To Date

 Number of Transactions   983   34,289
 Gross Notional Value $   258,555,094   10,940,945,355

 Revenue from Physical flows to date ($)    357,573,682

 Number of New Counterparties transacting today    4
 Number of Counterparties having transacted to date    226

 N.A. Gas

 Number of Transactions   801   28,371
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   132,759,574   5,623,731,527
 Gross Notional Value $   185,910,567   8,836,748,157

 UK Gas

 Number of Transactions   21   1,842
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   2,937,500   230,851,500
 Gross Notional Value $   5,901,258   462,088,010

 Belgium Gas

 Number of Transactions   -     75
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   -     15,555,000
 Gross Notional Value $   -     30,465,447

 U.S. Power

 Number of Transactions   119   2,912
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   1,244,721   22,946,455
 Gross Notional Value $   45,760,484   809,480,694

 UK Power

 Number of Transactions   5   148
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   302,280   6,515,593
 Gross Notional Value $   11,789,563   254,511,152

 Swiss Power

 Number of Transactions   1   24
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   89   40,266
 Gross Notional Value $   1,510   897,272

 German Power

 Number of Transactions   24   167
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   185,765   1,353,303
 Gross Notional Value $   3,539,236   25,611,968

 Spanish Power

 Number of Transactions   2   6
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   6,034,248   17,713,650
 Gross Notional Value $   175,132   631,836

 Norwegian Power

 Number of Transactions   4   91
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   84,720   1,654,944
 Gross Notional Value $   1,294,423   24,322,326

 Crude & Products

 Number of Transactions   -     233
 Volume of Transactions (BBl's)   -     25,767,697
 Gross Notional Value $   -     352,893,001

 Petchems

 Number of Transactions   1   34
 Volume of Transactions    8,000   296,000
 Gross Notional Value $   3,240,000   33,512,900

 LPG

 Number of Transactions   3   161
 Volume of Transactions (BBl's)   24,000   1,856,000
 Gross Notional Value $   816,000   63,566,000

 U.S. Coal

 Number of Transactions   1   74
 Volume of Transactions (st)   3   2,033,328
 Gross Notional Value $   126,000   25,674,683

 U.S. Pulp & Paper

 Number of Transactions   -     4
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     2,550
 Gross Notional Value $   -     1,500,750

 Emmissions

 Number of Transactions   -     58
 Volume of Transactions   -     145,000
 Gross Notional Value $   -     18,982,650

 U.S. Weather

 Number of Transactions   1   89
 Volume of Transactions    1   94
 Gross Notional Value $   920   58,510

 UK Weather

 Number of Transactions   -     11
 Volume of Transactions    -     11
 Gross Notional Value $   -     3,061

 Number of Users Logging onto EnronOnline:
 External Users with Execution rights    763
 External Users with No Execution Rights    95

 Internal Trading
 24-Feb-00  To Date
 Gas

 Number of Transactions   101   2,325
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   47,172,678   936,595,782
 Gross Notional Value $   90,047,730   1,597,151,851

 Power

 Number of Transactions   18   58
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   289,204   752,271
 Gross Notional Value $   6,994,291   23,157,566

 Coal

 Number of Transactions   -     -
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     -
 Gross Notional Value $   -     -

 Emmissions

 Number of Transactions   -     -
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     -
 Gross Notional Value $   -     -

 Total

 Number of Transactions   119   2,383
 Gross Notional Value $   97,042,022   1,620,309,417

Regards

Louise


You are right. Do have a drink for me. See you tomorrow.
Yao

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 05/02/2001 08:58 AM
To: Yao Apasu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Re: Dinner Tomorrow in San Antonio

Yao, you're a bum, we will miss you at dinner tonight!

	Yao Apasu@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	05/01/2001 06:11 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Dinner Tomorrow in San Antonio

Thanks, Tana. I am still in Houston at that time. See you at the conference.
Yao

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 05/01/2001 05:16 PM
To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron,
Francisco Pinto Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark
Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Yao
Apasu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Dinner Tomorrow in San Antonio

We will need to catch a cab to get to La Fogata which is located at 2427
Vance Jackson Road in San Antonio.  Our dinner reservations are for 7:00 pm,
so I suggest we all meet in the hotel lobby at 6:30 and catch group cabs
together.  Dress is casual.  The phone number for the restaurant is
210-340-1337, in case you get lost in a wild cab ride or something similar
(this will have special meaning to certain swap group members!).  If you
haven't RSVP'd back to me, please do so, so I can get an accurate head count
for tomorrow.

See you in San Antonio.


Please see work station list below.

adr

New Loc	   Phone	   Location	   Name
  3902	  853-1796	    1338	  Steve Harris
  3901	  853-5849	    1337	  Audrey Robertson
  3905A	  853-6007	    1337a	  Lindy Donoho
  3910b	  853-3098	    1346	  Kim Watson
  3910d	  853-7610	    1341	  TK Lohman
  3910a	  853-5403	    1341a	  Lorraine Lindberg
  3910f	  345-7932	    1342	  Michelle Lokay
  3910c	  345-7896	    1343	  Mark McConnell
  3910e	  345-4173	    1344	  Paul E Y'barbo
  3915b	  345-3858	    1340	  Jan Moore
  3942	  853-5028	    1335	  James Centilli
  3905	  Phone*		  Lawyer
  3915a	  Phone*		  Finacial Assistant


Rod, your request for headcount numbers was forwarded to me from Wilson.  As
of 11/06/2000 the total headcount for ETS is 2647.
This total includes all active, regular full time hourly/salary employees.
The total number of employees increases to 2663 if you add regular parttime
hourly/salary and regular reduced hourly/salary employees.

The total number of Houston based employees is 607.  This number includes all
active, regular full time hourly/salary employees whose work city is
"Houston".  This includes 1400 Smith, 333 Clay, 2900 N. Loop and 15229
Kuykendahl.    This number increases to 613 if you add regular parttime
hourly/salary and regular reduced hourly/salary employees.

If considering Pasadena as part of "Houston", totals increase to 660 for
regular full time hourly/salary employees;  666 including regular parttime
hourly/salary and regular reduced hourly/salary employees.

Clean Fuels and the newly transferred EOTT employees are included in all of
the above totals.  If you need additional information or a more detailed
breakout based on different criteria, you may call me at 3,4878.

Thanks.


I don't think we need the language, especially since the guarantees won't
apply to retrofitting the plant later.

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 02/07/2001 09:08:48 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Words to go with the other 2 emails regarding Austin

I would recommend that we not insert Eric's comments regarding the
exhaust temperature and energy guarantees for combined cycle facilities.
As Eric indicates, this is a simple cycle plant, which is similar to
Fountain Valley.  When commenting on the Fountain Valley agreement, Lee
recommended that all references to exhaust temperature and energy
guarantees be stricken and we did so.  In addition, Lee has already seen
a version of the City of Austin agreement that had Sections 10.4.1 and
10.4.3 (the sections Eric would like to reinstated) stricken. Let me
know what you think, but I recommend we leave them out, particularly if
such sections are not necessary and would only be useful to have in the
future if the plant ever went combined cycle.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 2:28 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Subject: Words to go with the other 2 emails regarding Austin

Here's what Eric wrote:

I revised the contract you sent me to make it site specific.  Those
changes
are redlined.  Please note that I have reinserted sections 10.4.1 and
10.4.3 as well as the defined terms that go with them.  These were
related
to exhaust temperature and energy.  I know this is a simple cycle plant
and
they typically aren't required, but I wanted to see if GE would
guarantee
it anyway.  It maybe helpful in the future if Austin Energy goes
combined
cycle.  If for some reason GE's lawyers specifically want to leave that
out, then they will probably also want to delete sections 10.4.2 and
10.4.4
(and their defined terms) since those also talk about specific exhaust
guarantees.  Let me know what they decide.

Exhibit A (site basis conditions) which I also revised was not attached
to
your file.  (It's right behind the sign-off pages in my hard copy.)  I
therefor hand marked up a copy and scanned it.  It is now attached as a
separate word file.

Exhibit F is "boiler plate" and shouldn't change.  Exhibit "U" is not in
my
hard copy.  My copy only goes up to Exhibit "T."   If you get something
from GE on Exhibit "U", send it to me and I will be glad to review it.


As you requested, I am attaching my list of pre-petition mutual terminations (as well as 3 post-petition mutual terminations).  This list is located in excel in my misc. directory.  As per your direction, I will also deliver my binder of mutual terminations to Susan Bailey.


in

From:  Bryan Hull
01/03/2001 09:55 AM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denver
Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Timothy
Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Reagan Mathews/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:
Subject: Basketball

The next season starts January 17th. I need to have the stuff turned in right
away.  Let me know ASAP if you want to play this season.


Tana,

My name is Sandra Vu with the EnronOnline call center and I have a customer
that is calling to request execute rights for US Gas Financial Basis Swap and
US Gas Financial Swap.  The company name is Coast Energy Group, a division of
Cornerstone Propane, L.P. and the individual requesting this change is Randy
Hughes one of their Master users on EnronOnline.  He also had a question as
to why the Coast Energy Canada, Inc. has execute rights for these products
but they do not.  Randy's phone number is 403-508-6734.  I can call him back
with the information or feel free to call the customer whichever is the
easiest for you.  Thank you for assistance in this matter.

Sandra Vu
EnronOnline
713-853-4357 (help)


Ditto Credit.

Shari


Perfect.

Beth Cherry
___________
Sr. Creative Consultant
EnFORM Technology
713.350.1860

-----Original Message-----
From: Robinson, Misty
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:59 AM
To: ANGELO DAVIS (E-mail); Betty Godfrey (E-mail); Augusta Burney (E-mail) (E-mail); Brentley S. Felton (E-mail); Devon Anderson (E-mail); Rae Rae (E-mail); Sevena (E-mail); Landry, Ashley; Cherry, Beth; Lindner, Fred
Subject: FW: Computer in French

-----Original Message-----
From: Bernal, Claudia
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:45 AM
To: EnFORM - Admin Assistants; EnFORM - HelpDesk; Nguyen, Viet
Subject: FW: Computer in French

----- Original Message -----
       A language instructor was explaining to her class that French nouns,
       unlike their English counterparts, are grammatically
       designated as masculine or feminine.
       "House," in French, is feminine - "la maison."
       "Pencil," in French, is masculine - "le crayon."
       One puzzled student asked, "What gender is computer?"
       The teacher did not know, and the word wasn't in her French
       dictionary. So for fun she split the class into two groups appropriately
      enough, by gender, and asked them to decide whether "computer" should be a
      masculine or feminine noun. Both groups were required to give four
      reasons for their recommendation.
        The men's group decided that computers should
        definitely be of the feminine gender ("la computer"), because:
         1. No one but their creator understands their
            internal logic;
         2. The native language they use to communicate with
            other computers is incomprehensible to everyone else
         3. Even the smallest mistakes are stored in long-term
            memory for possible later retrieve; and
         4. As soon as you make a commitment to one, you find
            yourself  spending half your pay check on accessories for it.
       The women's group, however, concluded that computers
       should be masculine ("le computer"), because:
        1. In order to do anything with them, you have to
           turn them on
        2. They have a lot of data but still can't think for themselves
        3. They are supposed to help you solve problems, but
           half the time they are the problem; and
        4. As soon as you commit to one, you realize that if
           you'd waited a little longer, you could have gotten a better model.

Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


Sara,
We want to open an account with Direct Trading Corp.,  There service is an
ECN, similar to Instinet.
I will send up the agreement to you for your review.  Kelly Templeton will
drop it off to you this afternoon.
Please call with questions, 3-3210.
Thanks. Sheila


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
06:37 PM ---------------------------

James A Hughes@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/30/2000 03:39 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Greg Whalley@ECT
Subject: Re: Cuiaba I Team

Dave:

The Cuiaba meeting is on Monday at 3:00 pm.  Location to be determined.  I
will forward the location ASAP.

Jim


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
06:49 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Louise Kitchen & Philippe Bibi @ ENRON
01/31/2001 01:46 AM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: ENW-Employees
cc:
Subject: Organizational Announcement

We are pleased to announce the following promotions within Enron Net Works.
These promotions will be effective February 1, 2001.   We would like to thank
these individuals for their past contributions and recognize their
instrumental roles in the growth and success of the organization.  Please
join us in congratulating the following employees, and wishing them continued
success with Enron.

To Managing Director
Sally Beck

To Vice President  To Senior Specialist
David Forster  Luis Aybar
David Samuels  Matthew Burleigh
Jay Webb  Heather Busby
  Stephen(Steve) Harrington
To Senior Director  Wei Hu
Scott Mills  Aneela Charania
Kevin Sweeney  Diane Ellstrom
  David Rae
To Director  Shifali Sharma
Michael(Mike) Croucher  Gang(George) Ji
Rahil Jafry  Jorge Mancero
Savita Puthigai  Kirti Patel
Ganapathy Ramesh  Virendra Patel
Drew Ries  Raleigh(Trey) Rhodes
Stuart Reed  Mark Symms
Thresa Allen  Carlos Uribe
Jeffrey Gossett  Ye Wang
Kim Theriot  Amelia Alland
Stacey White  Cynthia Balfour-Flanagan
  Stacey Brewer
To Manager  Marlene Hilliard
Nilay Basu  Dawn Kenne
Frank Coles  Errol McLaughin
Mark Davidson  Kevin Meredith
Daniel(Dan) Dietrich  Meredith Mitchell
Colin Tonks  Thien-Huong Ngo
Danielle Marcinkowski  Brian Palmer
Kari Oquinn  Mark Schrab
Tai Nguyen  Stephanie Sever
Cornelio Pua  Christopher Spears
Amy Spoede  Tara Sweitzer
Gerald(Jake) Staffel  Sabrae Zajac
Vernell Vallejo
Jing Fang(Jennifer) Zhou  To Specialist
Christopher Abel  Robert Henry
David Baumbach  Benjamin(Ben) Jordan
Rebecca Ford  Nikolay Kraltchev
Ngiam(Jeremy) Wong  Grace Warren
Matthew Brown  Kenneth(Kenny) Lim
Clara Carrington  Victoria Sorkina
Richard Cross  Patrick Marchand
John Swinney  Sumit Shah
Maya Beyhum  Kori Loibl
Patricia Sullivan  Bruce Mills
Patricia Spence  Mathew Motsinger
Dimitri Taylor  Bernice Rodriquez
Darron Giron  Brandi Wachtendorf
Kristen Hanson  Patryk Wlodarski
Larry Hunter
William Kasemervisz  To Staff
Kam Keiser  Norma Yeverino
Monica Lande  Geralynn Gosnell
David Maxwell  Judith Walters
Melissa Ratnala  Richard Miley
  Joan Winfrey
Technical Consultant  Guy Freshwater
Xiaozhuo(Sean) Yang  Brent Storey
Show-Yien(Show) Lee  Stuart Thom
Nai-Chung(Jesse) Wang  Jonathan White
Jin Yu
  To Executive Assistant
Associate To Manager  Peggy McCurley
Jason Althaus  Tammie Schoppe
Cheryl Ingstad
Ross Mesquita  To Administrative  Coordinator
Leonardo Pacheco  Heather Choate

To Administrative Assistant I  To Senior Clerk
Ali De Hoyos  Matthew Davies
  Demonica Lipscomb
To Senior Assistant  Mark Pilkington
Barbara Lewis  Daniela De Lisi
Sarah Knott  Tresea Parker
Thais Hensch  Angela Barnett
 Laura Vargas


EES spreadsheet
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001
12:19 PM ---------------------------

Jubran Whalan@EES
11/14/2000 02:43 PM
To: Term Hedges for EES Portfolio
cc:
Subject: 11/14


Hello Gals:

Per Holden's request, we need to add his name in the distribution list in our daily email for West Reports (i.e. "the Kimberly email").

Thanks.


Just fyi -- Amabile did not present to Enron management as she was unavialable on the day of the meeting.  Some of her work was presented by her colleague and Enron Advisory Council member -- Pankaj Ghemewat.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James, Terrie
Sent:	Friday, September 07, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	'tamabile@hbs.edu'
Cc:	Kean, Steven J.; Olson, Cindy
Subject:	Enron Management Conference

Professor Amabile,

I work for Enron, a leading energy company based in Houston.  I believe you recently presented some of your research on creativity and motivation to members of our management team.  I am responsible for preparing the business agenda for Enron's annual Management Conference.  Scheduled in San Antonio on November 15-16, the two-day meeting brings together more than 400 Enron executives.

Enron has been named most innovative company for six consecutive years by Fortune magazine.  However, this year has been challenging for the company.  External market issues and internal restructurings have resulted in a depressed stock price and low moral among employees.

Your insights on creating a motivating work environment and stimulating innovation would be especially interesting at this year's conference.  If you are interested in presenting to our group, I'd like to explore your availability the morning of Friday, November 16.

Please feel free to respond to my email or call me at 713-853-7727.  I look forward to hearing from you.

Terrie James
Senior Director, Public Relations
Enron Broadband Services
(ph) 713.853.7727
(fax) 713.646.3248
terrie.james@enron.com


I've simulated the Aggregate power portfolio's VAR with the BPA contract (approx. $51MM) as a stand alone (approx $3MM) and with the BPA position reversed out (approx $49MM).  Only issue seems to be that the VAR related to the position per credit Agg does not "tie" with VAR related to position in Enpower - I'm attributed this to the peak/off peak simulation difference.  Specifically, the credit agg file does not define what was peak or off peak, whereas file from Enpower did, resulting in more accurate measurement of risk.  Bottom line is that BPA removal appears to be risk reducing.

Frank


Susan:
I am okay with these changes so long as we make clear to them that by
agreeing to take out arbitration we are not setting a precedent with them
with respect to any future agreements (i.e., ISDA Master etc.) that we intend
to enter into with them.  Please let me see the agreement as I think that if
we go back to our non-arbitration language, there is other language that
needs to be added.
Carol


Immediately following meeting, there will be a group luncheon outside of office.  Location for lunch will be determined at a later date.


Dear Golfboxx.com Members,

This month is coming to an end. Hurry and reserve you tee times.
These specials only last for a short while more. We will once again
be accepting registrations online for prizes, giveaways, and free golf.

Here are the specials and announcements for this month:

Atascocita Golf Calendar is up with a lots good deals
http://www.bizzboxx.com/golfboxx/atascocita/webcal/

Be sure to check out all the courses calendar for good golf offers
http://www.golfboxx.com/houston.htm

Thank you for using www.golfboxx.com.

Golfboxx.com Internet Team

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Start Date: 1/17/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011714.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Enron Managing Directors, Vice Presidents, Directors, and Managers  Who
Utilize the Associate/Analyst Pool

As a follow up from a "SAVE THE DATE"  email regarding your participation in
the  Associate and Analyst  Super Saturday process, now is the time to select
your dates to attend and participate.

Below are the dates for Super Saturday weekends during the upcoming
recruiting season.  If you are Houston-based or if you know you will be in
Houston on business at the appropriate times please click the link below to
volunteer.

http://axis.enron.com/notice/ssinvite.asp
(When selecting dates please avoid selecting to interview candidates who
attend the schools for which you are a team member.)

Associates     Analysts
October 27-28, 2000    November 3-4
Thunderbird, UT, Georgetown, Rice  Rice, UT, Baylor, A&M, OU, Florida, LSU,
UHCL

November 10-11, 2000    November, 17-18, 2000
Columbia, Stern NYU, UCLA, Darden, Cornell Penn, UVA, Vanderbilt, Michigan,
Howard, AUC,
Vanderbilt, Michigan    UHMain

December, 1-2, 2000    December 8-9, 20000
Chicago, Kellogg, Harvard, Wharton, MIT Wellesley, overflow and re-schedules
from previous s/s

Friday, December 15, 2000
Carnegie Mellon

Thank you for your support of the Associate and Analyst Programs.
Shelly Jones
Recruiting Manager


fyi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ordway, Chris
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Boudreaux, Shanna; Garcia, Clarissa; Lamadrid, Victor; Townsend,
Judy; Versen, Victoria
Subject: FW: TE Critical System Warning

FYI...

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: infopost@duke-energy.com [mailto:infopost@duke-energy.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:00 AM
To: infopost@duke-energy.com
Subject: TE Critical System Warning

November 26, 2001

As indicated by the Critical System Warning issued November 25, 2001,
based on anticipated system operations and weather conditions, as stated
below, TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP (Texas Eastern) is requiring that
all customers take immediate and prompt steps to eliminate excess
receipts and conform scheduled receipts to actual deliveries. This
system-wide warning is issued as a result of actual receipts into the
system significantly exceeding actual deliveries. This Critical System
Warning shall remain in place until further notice.

Weather in the market area continues to be unseasonably mild and
shippers have been filling contract storage inventories in anticipation
of the coming winter heating season.  At this time, Texas Eastern's
storage capacity is approximately 98% full.  As a result, there is
virtually no storage capacity or linepack available for system
operational purposes and Texas Eastern cannot continue to absorb actual
imbalances left on the system.

Because of the critical nature of this situation and the fact that Texas
Eastern no longer has the ability to further absorb imbalances being
left on the system, Texas Eastern requests that all customers coordinate
with their suppliers the actual quantities received into the system to
match actual customer takes in the market area.  No due pipe gas will be
accepted into the system until further notice.

If immediate action does not result in reducing the current volume of
gas being left on the system, Texas Eastern may be forced to issue an
operational flow order ("OFO") requiring actual receipts of gas to match
actual deliveries out of the system, which will be subject to the OFO
non-compliance penalty of $25 per dekatherm.  In addition and as
provided for in Texas Eastern's FERC Gas Tariff, Texas Eastern will take
any other actions as may be necessary to protect the integrity of its
system, including, but not limited to, suspension of OBA's.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.


Agree.  Sounds like a very reasonable way to proceed, and consistent with
what we've said all along, non?  Thanks, Harry.  Jeanne, while your at it,
could you get us a new Governor?  Thanks so much.

Best,
Jeff

	Harry Kingerski
	02/26/2001 04:59 PM

		 To: JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
		 cc: "'Harry Kingerski (E-mail)'" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "'Jeff
Dasovich (E-mail)'" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Bob Frank (E-mail)'"
<robert.frank@enron.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'" <smara@enron.com>,
"'sstoness@enron.com'" <sstoness@enron.com>, "'Tamara Johnson (E-mail)'"
<tjohnso8@enron.com>
		 Subject: Re: Brief in Rate Stabilization Proceeding

Jeanne - you shouldn't compromise Enron's prior statements on ending the rate
freeze.  The most important thing is that we not get a retroactive end of the
rate freeze (retroactive to any time before the date of the order).  We may
also accomplish this through legislation.

Regarding the book vs. market valuation, it is less important that we argue
for market or book than it is we should clarify for the commission how and
why it should be consistent with the new legislation.  If new legislation
occurs and means that utility generation will be priced at cost for 10 years,
then everyone needs to realize that is a fundamentally different construct.
DA Customers are not getting the value of these plants through the valuation
process so they must have access to that value through the access to retained
generation approach. If cost based rates are not legislated, market valuation
shoud proceed.  What we don't want is for them to legislate cost-based rates
and then forget about the value being stripped from DA.

Also, seems like it could be a good thing to point out that if they do
declare an end to the rate freeze, if it is effective before new replacement
legislation is enacted, they've only created another quagmire.   I'll call to
discuss.

	JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
	02/26/2001 10:32 AM

		 To: "'Bob Frank (E-mail)'" <robert.frank@enron.com>, "'Harry Kingerski
(E-mail)'" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'" <smara@enron.com>, "'Tamara
Johnson (E-mail)'" <tjohnso8@enron.com>, "'sstoness@enron.com'"
<sstoness@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Brief in Rate Stabilization Proceeding

Despite the fact that the hearings will probably continue into Wednesday of
this week, the briefs in Phase I of the Rate Stabilization Proceeding are
still due this Friday the 2nd.  One of the issues before the  ALJ is the use
of interim versus final market valuation to end the rate freeze.  I am very
hesitant to say that the rate freeze cannot end on the basis of a Commission
approved interim valuation as Enron has, in previous proceedings, taken the
position that it can.  Please let me know right away if you feel different
about this.  Along these same lines, the issue of the value of the assets is
somewhat at play (at least on an interim basis).  Do we want to take a
position that the assets need to be market valued (rather than book) thus
increasing the rate base for the purpose of cost of service regulation which
the assets are now under? Increased generation rate would mean an increased
DA credit. However, it may also hurt our claim that we should get a piece of
the retained generation.  Again let me know as soon as possible about your
position.

Jeanne Bennett


I will ask him to give you a call
  he is sitting right near me this week.

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/16/2001 05:37 PM
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

How can I get in touch with Derek Lee?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	04/16/2001 04:04 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek Lee/EU/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Sara,

The point person in London has been Derek Lee.

He is here in Houston right now, and will be for the remainder of the week.

I would love it if we could coordinate both entities as one negotiation.

Perhaps you and derek should compare notes?

FYI - Ted Leh has sent a message to Jeff Kinneman that he is working with you
on the docs.  Thanks,  that should ease management's mind somewhat as to
continuing progress.

Thanks,

Tom

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/16/2001 03:54 PM
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Tom:

I forwarded a copy of the ECI unanimous consent to Goldman to see if they
will accept "as is".  I have not heard back.  Goldman legal will email repo
docs.

Regarding Enron Credit Limited ("ECL"), I spoke with Goldman commercial and
understand that someone (don't know who) from London ECL contacted Goldman
inquiring about repos.  I'm happy to facilitate with contacts, etc. so please
let me know.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	04/16/2001 01:29 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Whenever you decide whether the UCD for ECI is sufficient or not please let
me know urgently.  Management in London has some aggressive expectations for
a deliverable on repos.  We will have to push back on them if the UCD has to
be redrafted.

I would very much like to give management a clear status and a realistic
time-frame for when we can expect to have the repo capacity in place.

I do recognize the time frame is highly dependent on what the current
situation actually is.  Therefore I am hopeful we can answer the below
questions sooner than later.

If I can provide any help in anyway please let me know.

Tom,

04/16/2001 12:16 PM
Cheryl Nelson
Cheryl Nelson
Cheryl Nelson
04/16/2001 12:16 PM
04/16/2001 12:16 PM
Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Sara, I do not agree with the view that we cannot use the existing
resolutions for repos.  Please call me at your convenience so that we can
discuss.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Tom Doukas
	04/16/2001 08:55 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

I am assuming that you are saying that if repos go through the Prime Broker
accounts it is a problem.  The poblem being that the current brokerage
agreements for ECI do not provide for repos.  Is my assumption correct?

Is our UCD adequate as is for repos?

What is our existing format that you mention below?

Are you able to pursue this with Goldman right now today?

Thanks,

Tom

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 04/16/2001 08:36 AM
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Tom:

I am not certain that the existing resolution permits repurchase and reverse
repurchase transactions and securities lending, bonds borrow pledge, etc. as
the brokerage consent was not written to accommodate these types of
transactions.  However, if the repo party will accept our existing format,
then we need not worry.  I'll call Ted Leh and try to find the proper Goldman
person.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	04/16/2001 08:10 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Greg
Hedger/LON/ECT@ECT, Reza Rezaeian/EU/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")

Sara,

Can you please provide your findings on the following items:

1. Determine with Cheryl that ECI is in fact authorized to transact Repos

2. How robust the Goldman Repo agreements are, and their sutability to ECI.

3. An estimate on how long it will take to set up the Goldman Repo Agreements
in ECI's name.

Can you please also provide any ideas how ECI or ECL could transact a Repo
trade today using existing documentation.

London has indicated an urgent need to carry out these transactions.

Thanks,

Tom


Thanks Vince and likewise congratulations on your promotion to MD!  I enjoyed
getting to work with you and your group over the past year.    Rick C.


Scott, I have sent out twice a request to each of the field teams in the
Midland Region to provide some desperately needed tank information to
determine compliance for all the EOTT crude oil tanks in the Midland area.
So far, only the Midland, Lovington, Kermit, Andrews, Hobbs and Jal teams
have responded. I would appreciate your assistance in motivating the
remaining seven teams to get this information to me at their earliest
convenience.  I have attached the most recent update of the tank spreadsheet
for you to pass on to the teams.

Thanks for the help.


Thanks!
--------------------------
Rick S.

-----Original Message-----
From: Migden, Janine <Janine.Migden@ENRON.com>
To: Shapiro, Richard <Richard.Shapiro@ENRON.com>; Knight, Laurie <Laurie.Knight@ENRON.com>; Steffes, James D. <James.D.Steffes@ENRON.com>
CC: Dernehl, Ginger <Ginger.Dernehl@ENRON.com>
Sent: Wed Nov 21 09:57:25 2001
Subject: RE: OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS ON RETAINER

Written notices will go out today or by Monday.

	 -----Original Message-----
	From: 	Shapiro, Richard
	Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:34 AM
	To:	Knight, Laurie; Steffes, James D.
	Cc:	Dernehl, Ginger; Migden, Janine
	Subject:	RE: OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS ON RETAINER

	Please process the notices of terminations by the 30th of this month. Thanks.

		 -----Original Message-----
		From: 	Knight, Laurie
		Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:31 AM
		To:	Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard
		Cc:	Dernehl, Ginger; Migden, Janine
		Subject:	OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS ON RETAINER

		Below is a list of contacts for the outside consultants e pay on retainer for the Midwest Region.

		The Hultman Company
		Contact:	Cal Hultman
		515/244-4480

		BoseTreacy
		2700 First Indiana Plaza
		Indianapolis, IN 46204
		Contact:	Don Blinzinger
		317/684-5882

		Roy Cagle & Associates
		1101 East 20th Street
		Joplin, MO 64802
		Contact:	Roy Cagle
		417/623-1110

		Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease
		52 East Gay Street
		P O Box 1008
		Columbus, OH 43216-1008
		Contact:	Tom Winters
		614/464-8274

		Ronan Potts
		400 North Michigan Avenue
		Chicago, IL 60611
		Contact:	F. John Potts
		312/645-0756

		Michael Bourgeois
		Contact:	Michael Bourgeois
		225/927-5619

		Piper, Marbury, Rudnick & Wolfe
		203 North LaSalle Street
		Suite 1800
		Chicago, IL 60601
		Contact:	Chris Townsend
		312/368-4039

		Karoub Associates
		121 West Allegan Street
		Lansing, MI 48933
		Contact:	Jim Crawford
		517/482-5000

		Thank you
		Laurie


Nice job on the postcard.  I will get you an answer on the mailout tomorrow
morning.  Let me know if you hear anything from EOL regarding the new version.

Thanks,
Mike Grigsby


Mark, FYI.  Deb

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	trish.lindloff@weil.com@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 4:11 PM
To:	Korkmas, Deb
Cc:	stuart.ogg@weil.com
Subject:	RE: PBOG Corp.

Deb,

That was an entity that Lavorato asked us to set up as an alternative to
Swapco in a non-bankruptcy, non-Dynegy scenario, so Mark Taylor would know
about it.  It was supposed to be SOG Corp., but that name was not available
so we started adding letters on until we got one that worked (the state of
Delaware was holding on the phone).  I would imagine that we will dissolve
this entity.  I will check with Stuart and Mark.

As for Swapco, I am going through the documents and will send you an email
listing all the signatures/action items we still have outstanding in order
to wrap this up.

Thanks for you help.

Regards,
Trish

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1300
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 746-8116 (direct)
trish.lindloff@weil.com

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (214-746-7700), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


Action Plan

Meeting 1 - Presentations from key individuals to provide information/insight
into the important issues facing the new Fire Chief.
 - where - Enron offices
 - commitment - full day?
  - 3/4 day - presentations - estimate a total of about 4-5 presenters - 1hr?
per presentation, including Q&A - (for example, presentation of key points
from TriData study and Dr. Persse, EMS Director, has agreed to provide a
presentation on EMS issues)
  - 1/4 day - committee members will jointly compile a list of key
attributes/qualifications seeking in potential candidates
 - distribution of resumes from interested/pursued candidates (estimate
approximately 20 resumes)

Meeting 2 - Screen resumes and jointly decrease candidate list to 10
 - where - Enron offices
 - commitment - 1/2 day?

Meeting 3 - Interview the 10 candidates and jointly decrease candidate list
to 3
 - where - Enron offices
 - commitment - full day - each interviewee will be presented to the 5
committee members for a formal interview - Please note, logistically we may
not be able to bring in all 10 candidates on the same day and may have to
meet on two separate days

Meeting 4 - Meet with Mayor Brown to present candidate list of 3
 - where - City Hall?

Please email comments/suggestions/questions as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Lisa


We will be having a group meeting on May 10th at 4 PM. We will be discussing
tagging, changing fundamentals, and group changes.  Pizza will be provided.
I would like to have these meetings on a monthly basis to stay on top of the
changing market and to keep everyone updated with changes on the floor.  If
you cannot make the meeting or have something in particular you would like
discussed, or have a preference in pizza, please let me know as soon as
possible.

Thanks,
Bill


Start Date: 2/17/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001021713.txt


Outstanding!  I'm in Houston on Thursday, flying to the big O on the 8:30 pm
flight.  I'd love to get together for dinner around 5:00 or so if that works
out for you guys.  Any chance of getting together with both of you?  DF

Mark Schroeder@ECT
07/10/2000 04:24 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Houston

Flying in to Houston with Mary on Thursday afternoon, and back to London on
Saturday p.m.  Any chance of seeing you, e.g., an early dinner on Thursday?
mcs


thank you.

Jeff

Chris Mahoney
10/23/2000 11:43 AM
To: Ted Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Hauser/NA/Enron@Enron, Luis
Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry Gagliardi/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mario de la
Ossa/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jim Goughary/HOU/ECT@ECT, David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bill F Briggs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Schroeder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Danaher/NA/Enron@Enron, Phil Clifford/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Wilson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Pavel Zadorozhny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Yeboah/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Fuller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Spencer Vosko/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alberto Valcarcel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne B
Clapp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Seigle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Mahoney/LON/ECT@ECT,
Niamh Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Ross Koller/LON/ECT@ECT, John Buckner
Thomas/LON/ECT@ECT, Chris Glaas/LON/ECT@ECT, Anastasia
Karabatsos/LON/ECT@ECT, Tracy Wallace/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard
Slovenski/SIN/ECT@ECT, Patrick Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Hans Wong/SIN/ECT@ECT, Wang Moi Eng/SIN/ECT@ECT, Caroline
Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Jones/LON/ECT@ECT, Alex Mcleish/EU/Enron@Enron,
Tony O'Brien/LON/ECT@ECT, Henkka Talvitie/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: mkt thoughs

we ran out of time in the meeting....my thoughts fwiw

short-term this market is going to continue to be sideways and choppy.
weather fundamentals don't exist and nothing else will be fundamentally
bullish or bearish enough to lead the market for the next several weeks.

 Most people (including the majority of our shop) are getting bearish on the
back of the builds we should have based upon iea supply/demand predictions.
One concern here is that they have materialized yet over q3.  If we look at
the poor reaction to bullish news last week
(api stats/unrest in the middle east) I think it is safe to say that the
sentiment in the market has turned bearish.
In general I want to go with the majority of the mkt but the rally that
resulted when the violence erupted in the middle east two weeks ago shows
the surprises will still be on the upside.   the way that we gave back all
that ground reflects how little confidence there is in the mkt at the moment
that these fundamentals last too much longer.  How many reports have you read
lately about borrowed heating oil demand?  my back of the
evelope calculations suggest that although this is somewhat true it only true
for 150kbd in the winter vs an underlying demand of 4000kbd so
maybe not such a big disappointment to come.

we still like being bullish distillate in europe for the winter but think
that the mkt will be range bound on spreads and vs the complex until the need
for winter coats comes along.


YIPPEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: ABB rev 10

Kay:

He was in meetings all afternoon and hasn't had a chance to review the
changes.  He will try to get you and Dave connected on Monday to discuss the
assignment issue.  I think that is the only outstanding item.

 I sent a copy to Old Eagle Eyes Dieball for his final review and approval.
I'll have you sign off on Monday (I hope!)

Enjoy an Enron-free weekend.
Kathy


-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Lawler [mailto:brettlawler@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 1:08 PM
To: a_diekman@hotmail.com; BLawler875@aol.com; CHMARGAU@aol.com;
chris_a_regnier@yahoo.com; cll@prodigy.net; ebass@ect.enron.com;
John9375@aol.com; marilynmontano@hotmail.com; mcoombes6400@hotmail.com;
mybulldog189@hotmail.com; Rachael_Harman@gabrobins.com; srhea@acm.org
Subject: Fwd: Tom Clancy's Response

Tom Clancy is cool.

:)

>
>For Tom Clancy, the world's highest-paid fiction writer - whose
>thrillers have sold 60 million copies and been turned into
>blockbuster movies - the events of Tuesday hold a special poignancy.
>In his best selling novel Debt Of Honor in 1994, he created a
>scenario chillingly similar to the attacks; a Japanese pilot crashes
>a 747 jet into the US Capitol buildings, killing the President and
>most of his Cabinet. Here, Clancy explains why the mood of his
>nation is now turning to revenge.
>
>***************
>
>It was a friend of mine formerly of the Royal Navy who first pointed
>out that the casualty count on this incident exceeds that of Pearl
>Harbor. Yes, my country has taken a big and costly hit, and
>somewhere, perhaps in South Asia, some people are exchanging
>high-fives and having themselves a good laugh.
>
>And maybe they're entitled to it. Like Pearl Harbor, it was a well
>planned and well executed black operation. But, you know, they've
>made the same mistake that Japan made back in 1941. It's remarkable
>to me that America is so hard for some people to understand. We are
>the most open of books, after all. Our values and customs are
>portrayed on TV and movie screens all over the world. Is the
>character of my country so hard to grasp?
>
>Japan figured that they could defeat us not physically, but morally,
>that America was not tough enough to defeat their death-seeking
>warriors, that we would be unwilling to absorb the casualties. (In
>this they were right: we didn't absorb all the casualties they tried
>to inflict - but that was because we killed their samurai much more
>efficiently than they were able to kill our men). An enemy willing
>to die in the performance of his duty can indeed be a formidable
>adversary, but, you see, we've dealt with such people before. They
>die just like everyone else.
>
>Perhaps the American sort of patriotism, like the British sort, just
>isn't bombastic enough for our enemies to notice. We don't parade
>about thumping our chests and proclaiming how tough we are, whereas
>other people like that sort of display. But they don't seem to grasp
>the fact that they do it because they have to - they evidently need
>to prove to themselves how formidable they are.
>
>Instead, our people, like yours, train and practice their craft
>every day, out in the field at places like Fort Bragg, North
>Carolina, and Fort Irwin, California. I've been to both places and
>seen our people and how they train. The difference between a
>civilian or a common ruffian and a soldier, you see, is training.
>
>A professional soldier is as serious about his work as a surgeon is
>about his. Such people are not, in my experience, boastful. If you
>ask what they can do, they will explain it to you, usually in quiet
>tones, because they do not feel the need to prove anything. Off duty
>they are like everyone else, watching football on TV and enjoying a
>quiet beer with their pals. They read books, shop at the local
>supermarkets, and mow the grass at home. They all enjoy a good
>laugh. They make the best of friends. They look physically fit - and
>indeed they are physically fit - because their job requires it, and
>every day they do something tiresome in the field, working at some
>more or less demanding field exercise, again and again and again
>until every aspect of their job is as automatic as zipping one's
>zipper is for us people in civilian life.
>
>But, you know, inside all of these people, such as the 82nd Airborne
>at Fort Bragg, or the 75th Ranger Regiment at Fort Stewart, Georgia,
>there burns a little flame. Not a big one; instead like the pilot
>light in a gas stove. And when you put more gas there, the flame
>gets bigger, enough to cook with. Inside every one of these people
>is something else, something you have to look for - pride. They know
>that they are good at their work, in the event they ever have to do
>it for real. This doesn't happen very often, and indeed they do not
>ordinarily lust to do it because it's a serious, nasty job. The job
>is the taking of life.
>
>Military organizations exist for only one mission: killing people
>and breaking things. This is not something to be undertaken lightly,
>because life is a gift from God, and a lot of these people - kids, really -
>can be found in church on Sunday mornings. But their larger purpose - the
>reason these kids enlist, both in my country and in yours - is to preserve,
>protect, and defend their nations and the citizens who live there. It's not
>an easy job, but someone has to do it, and typically the hardest jobs
>attract the best of us. Mostly they never have to kill anybody, and that's
>okay with them. It's knowing that
>they are able to do something difficult and dangerous that gives
>them their pride.
>
>This purpose, defending their country, is something they don't talk
>much about, but it's always there, and with it comes a quiet, steely look
>in the eyes. Especially when something like this happens. That's
>when their sense of self is insulted, and these are people who do
>not bear insults well. They are protectors, and when those whom they
>are sworn to protect are hurt, then comes the desire - the lust - to
>perform their mission. Even then it's quiet. They will not riot or
>pose before TV cameras or cry aloud for action, because that's not
>their way. They are the point of the lance, the very breath of the
>dragon, and at times like this they want to know the taste of blood.
>
>Their adversaries just don't appreciate what they are capable of.
>It's something too divorced from their experience. This isn't like hosing
>civilians with your machine-gun or setting off a bomb somewhere, or killing
>unarmed people strapped and helpless inside a commercial
>aircraft. This means facing professional warriors at a time and
>place of their choosing, and that is something terrorists don't
>really prepare for. The day of Pearl Harbor, the commander of the
>Japanese navy told his staff not to exult too much, that all their
>beautifully executed operation had accomplished was to awaken a
>sleeping dragon and give it a dreadful purpose.
>
>Perhaps alone in his country, Isoroku Yamamoto, who had lived
>briefly in America, knew what his enemy was capable of, and for that
>reason, perhaps he was not surprised when the .50-caliber bullet from a
>P-38 fighter entered his head and ended his life.
>
>Whoever initiated last week's operation is probably not quite as
>appreciative of what he has begun as Yamamoto was. Because the
>dragon is now fully awake, and its breath is too hot for men to
>bear. America is now fully awake. Our quiet patriotism is a little
>louder now, but it will not get too loud. Why spoil the surprise?
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Rakesh,

To confirm our conversation:

Please, go ahead and buy a copy.

Vince

Rakesh Bharati@ENRON
03/29/2001 02:06 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Visual Numerics CNL Licensing Issues

Vince,

Tanya and I feel that there is a need for a constrained optimization routine
for our VAR related research.   Numerical recipes does not contain
subroutines where equality and inequality contraints can be easily
incorporated.  Also, the number of arguments that can be handled is also
limited.

IMSL provides a comprehensive library of more than 300 C/C++  statistical and
mathematical analysis functions.  We think that it would be of great value to
our efforts and to the efforts of our research group.  Presently the cost is
aproximately around $1500 and Mike Bothwell (Visual Numerics Rep) assures us
as the version is not license protected, we all can use it as long as
simultaneous usage is within the license.

Please let me know if you should need further information.

Thanks,

Rakesh

---------------------- Forwarded by Rakesh Bharati/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001
01:44 PM ---------------------------

Mike Bothwell <mbothwell@houston.vni.com> on 03/29/2001 12:56:03 PM
To: "'Rakesh.Bharati@enron.com'" <Rakesh.Bharati@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Visual Numerics CNL Licensing Issues

Rakesh, I'm just following up to see how things looked on this.  Any change
in status?  Let me know I can furhter help you.

Best regards,

Mike Bothwell
Account Manager
Visual Numerics Inc.
Phone: 713-954-6423
Fax: 713-781-9260
Cell: 713-417-9069
mbothwell@houston.vni.com <mailto:mbothwell@houston.vni.com>
<http://www.vni.com/>

Visual Numerics Celebrates 30 Years
As an Independent Software Vendor

Rakesh,

As we discussed, the CNL 4.0 PC libraries are not license managed.  Version
5 will be.  The PC Version 4.0 can be installed on a network drive and
called from networked PCs.  As expected, we would ask that Enron honor the
license agreement by allowing only the number of simultaneous uses permitted
by the license.  Version 5.0 will be license managed and can be licensed as
node locked or floating.

With regard to Unix licensing, the current version of CNL for Unix is
license managed.  It can be licensed as node locked or floating.  If you
install the libraries on a Unix server as node locked, the number of
simultaneous sessions on that server is not limited except by the
capabilities of the machine.  A floating Unix license would be checked out
by the individual user to be executed on a local machine.

Also as mentioned, your investment is protected by allowing you to upgrade
in the future by paying only the price difference between your current and
desired platforms.  This upgrade option only applies to licenses covered
under support.

If you have any additional questions, please let me know.  I look forward to
providing you the best math and statistical libraries available today to
help you solve your problems and understand your data.

Best regards,

Mike Bothwell
Account Manager
Visual Numerics Inc.
Phone: 713-954-6423
Fax: 713-781-9260
Cell: 713-417-9069
mbothwell@houston.vni.com <mailto:mbothwell@houston.vni.com>
<http://www.vni.com/>

Visual Numerics Celebrates 30 Years
As an Independent Software Vendor


philly,

what's the story?

escotty


Start Date: 1/11/02; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011110.txt


Good afternoon, IT Wizards -

I'm curious about a feature on the new Forward Obligation Report. It is now
possible to run the report showing term, scheduled, or liquidated deals. In
the past I've always run the report showing term deals, then entered my
desk-to-desk deals from those numbers. Now I believe the report is designed
to pull data from our scheduling database, so I'm wondering what the
difference is between the term deal report and the scheduled deal report.
Each produce completely different numbers! Please let me know when you get a
chance.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


There are several items worth noting regarding the ERCOT's methodology:

Regulation Reserve Requirements (RGRS).  ERCOT has determined that 600 MW of
Reg up and down will be adequate for 95% of the hours during the year, if
historic patterns hold and if balancing energy is deployed properly.  During
what ERCOT considers to be "high stress" periods, they will increase their
normal RGRS requirement by a multiple of 2-3.  The initial start-up of the
single control area will  be considered "high stress" and ERCOT will purchase
2-3 what is necessary to cover the inexperience of the operators.  This will
be the practice until ERCOT is comfortable with the single control area (or
until market participants complain about the high cost of A/S).  The high
stress option will remain available for the first year of operations.
Non-Spinning Reserve Requirements (NSRS).  ERCOT proposes to a methodology of
purchasing NSRS only when projected risk of insufficiency is higher than
normal, or large amounts of spinning reserve are not projected to be
available online based on resource plans..  This boils down to where the
temperature is projected to be greater than 92 degrees, less than 32 degrees
Fahrenheit or uncertain and when spinning reserves less than 4600 MW are
projected.  Here is the process:
  1. Review the weather forecast for the next day and see if it differs
significantly from the current day.
  2. If the next day forecast is &similar8 to the current day forecast, and
the current day forecast high temperature is <92, and the current    day low
temperature is greater than 32 degrees, and the current day generation plan
shows >4600 MW of spinning reserve online    all day long, and the current
month is not April, May, or October, THEN no NSRS is considered to be
required all day for the next    day.
  3. Else: Purchase NSRS using the following:
  ? If the current month is April, May or October, then purchase NSRS in
amounts equal to the largest unit online for the hours     projected within
80% of peak hour.
  ? If today,s and tomorrow,s ERCOT high temperature is projected above 92
degrees, then purchase NSRS in amounts equal to the    largest unit online
for the hours projected warmer than 92 degrees.
  ? If tomorrow,s low temperature forecast is projected below 30 degrees,
then purchase NSRS in amounts equal to the largest unit    online for the
projected morning load pickup hours and hours projected within 80% of peak
hour.
   Purchase amounts of NSRS equal to the largest unit online for hours in
which the Day Ahead operator estimates spinning reserves    online will drop
lower than 4600 MW.
Replacement Reserve Requirements (RPRS).  The requirement will be set at the
amount of RPRS required to resolve supply inadequacy, CSC, and OC (local)
congestion simultaneously.  There will be procurement of RPRS if the resource
plans indicate capacity inadequacy based on the QSE scheduled load  with the
ERCOT projected load.  If the ERCOT projected load is greater than the QSE
scheduled load and capacity available in the resource plan does not cover the
difference, then there is a capacity inadequacy problem.  If the CSC flows
based on the QSE schedules are greater than the limits, then the CSC problems
are recorded.  Then a transmission contingency analysis will be run to
identify OC constraints.  If the flows are greater than the limits, the OC
flow values are recorded.  When there are insufficient RPRS bids for ERCOT to
resolve its reliability and security concerns, ERCOT may choose to request
OOM capacity or to use RMR units.  ERCOT will use the scheduling pricing
dispatch (SPD) to determine which OOM and RMR units should be selected and
when to discontinue OOM/RMR service.
Balancing Energy Requirement.  ERCOT's goal for balancing energy is (1) to
use BES so that regulation service in either direction is not depleted, (2)
to minimize net energy in regulation, and (3) to provide frequency control
when frequency is high, especially during minimum load intervals.  ERCOT will
use a two-step approach to calculate balancing energy service needs.  Step
one will be to clear the balancing energy service market resolving
load-generation balances and Zonal congestion (local congestion is ignored).
Step two is to determine the balance energy service needs to resolve local
congestion as well as generation-load balance and zonal congestion.   The
desired result of step two is to minimize the cost of local congestion which
will be an uplift to the market.
Balancing Energy Down Bid Percentage Requirement.  This will be used for
congestion management and frequency control (to correct for high frequency).
ERCOT will evaluate the export amount of each congestion management zone and
transmission transfer capability between CM Zones.  If the export amount is
greater than the calculated transfer capability of a CM Zone, then the
difference between these two values is the potential congested MW, or the
total MW of DES Down bids needed for clearing Zonal Congestion.  Also
sufficient down bid percentage requirement will be determined by ERCOT.
Market rules dictate that by 0600 of the day ahead QSEs will be notified of
this percentage requirement for BES down bids by Congestion Zone.
Responsive Reserve Requirement (RRS).  The RRS requirement is set at 2300 MW
for all hours under normal conditions.  Interruptible responsive reserve
cannot exceed 25% of the QSE total requirement.

For the initial start-up period of the market, ERCOT will have the tendency
to over buy ancillary services while the are "adjusting" to the single
control area.

Thane Thomas Twiggs
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002

713-853-3199 Voice
713-408-4463 Mobile
713-646-8272 Fax
877-968-8967 Digital Pager or 8779688967@skytel.com
----- Forwarded by Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 04/10/2001 04:59 PM -----

	Thane Twiggs
	04/10/2001 03:42 PM

		 To: Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clint Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Smith
L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike Curry/Enron@EnronXGate,
Martin Lin/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ron
McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jean Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Parks/Enron@EnronXGate, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ERCOT Ancillary Services Methodology

The attached file was large so I will provide the link to the ERCOT website.
If  you cannot down load and would like a hard copy, let me know.

http://www.ercot.com/currents.htm  -- It is under Ancillary Services
Methodologies.

Thane Thomas Twiggs
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002

713-853-3199 Voice
713-408-4463 Mobile
713-646-8272 Fax
877-968-8967 Digital Pager or 8779688967@skytel.com
----- Forwarded by Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 04/10/2001 03:38 PM -----

	Thane Twiggs
	04/10/2001 03:04 PM

		 To: Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clint Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Smith
L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike Curry/Enron@EnronXGate,
Martin Lin/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ron
McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jean Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Parks/Enron@EnronXGate, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ERCOT Ancillary Services Methodology

Attached is the proposed ERCOT ISO methodology for determining A/S
Purchases.  The methodologies will be presented to the ERCOT Board for
approval April 17, 2001.

Thane Thomas Twiggs
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002

713-853-3199 Voice
713-408-4463 Mobile
713-646-8272 Fax
877-968-8967 Digital Pager or 8779688967@skytel.com


I checked with Heather, and it turns out this second NCPA counterparty
shortname was set up to distinguish between two different SC numbers. But
it's only for internal use - both counterparty names have the same billing
information, etc. So Heather said the deals are fine as they are. I'm going
to find out more about this after the afternoon rush dies down - just so
we'll know for the future when to use which shortname.

Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/25/2001 02:04 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: NCPA #505486 and 505487

These two deals are entered with a special counterparty name that looks like
it may have been set up for some special deal.  There is another counterparty
name out there that looks just the same only without the very last series of
letters.  I will check here and see if anyone knows the difference.  There is
a note in the Global System that says Heather Dunton had this CP set up.  If
you could check with her and see if it should be used for these deals or if
the other CP should be used.

Thanks!


We are launching a number of committees to perform key functions across
Enron.  Enron,s breadth of activities and nonhierarchal organization make it
increasingly necessary to broaden the participation of Enron,s next
generation of leadership in the important decisions affecting the company.
Broadening participation will result in increased access to information as
decisions are made and will allow committee members to extend their working
relationships and influence throughout the company.

The committee charters and memberships are set forth below.  Not everyone
listed has been contacted in advance.  We urge you to serve if at all
possible, but, if you cannot, please contact the committee chair.

VP PRC

The VP PRC will continue to be responsible for evaluating the performance of
Enron,s Vice Presidents, determining promotions to Vice President, and
recommending promotions to Managing Director.  Additionally, the VP PRC will
review and propose changes to the PRC process, the performance evaluation
criteria and the promotion criteria.

The VP PRC will be chaired by Dave Delainey and its membership is as follows:

Tim Belden	Ben Glisan	Danny McCarty
Michael Brown	Joe Gold	Jeff McMahon
Rick Buy	Mark Haedicke	Rob Milnthorp
Wes Colwell	Jim Hughes	Matthew Scrimshaw
David Cox	Louise Kitchen	Jeff Shankman
Janet Dietrich	Michael Kopper	Richard Shapiro
Dave Duran	John Lavorato	Marty Sunde
Jim Fallon	Dan Leff

Analyst/Associate PRC

The analyst/associate PRC will be divided into 3 groups.  Enron Europe will
have the same committee evaluate analysts and associates.  This group will be
chaired by John Sherriff and its membership is as follows:

Pierre Aury	Kevin Heffron	Andreas Radmacher
Rob Bayley	Joe Hirl	Stuart Rexrode
Paul Chivers	Chris Mahoney	Marcello Romano
Markus Fiala	Christopher McKey	Bjarne Schieldrop
David Gallagher	Roy Poyntz	Ron Slimp
Bruce Garner	Paul Quilkey	Rob Stewart

The associate PRC for the Americas will be chaired by Stan Horton and its
membership is as follows:

Sally Beck 	Troy Henry	Kevin Presto
Jeremy Blachman	Sean Holmes 	Brad Richter
Don Black	Sean Long 	Stewart Seeligson
Dan Castagnola 	Rodney Malcolm	Hunter Shively
Joe Deffner	Scott Neal 	Jim Steffes
Kevin Garland	John Nowlan 	Andy Zipper
David Gorte	Ozzie Pagan

The analyst PRC for the Americas will be chaired by Steve Kean and its
membership is as follows:

Federico Cerisoli 	Mark Jackson 	Everett Plante
Jennifer Fraser 	Ben Jacoby 	Paul Racicot
Derrick Davies	Steve Jernigan 	Angela Schwarz
Scott Gahn 	Jay Lewis 	Ed Smida
Rod Hayslett	Cheryl Lipshutz 	Jon Thomsen
Rogers Herndon 	Michael Mann	Emilio Vicens
Brenda Herod 	Ed McMichael 	Frank Vickers
Kevin Howard 	Steve Meyers

Analyst/Associate Program

The most essential determinant of Enron,s continued growth is our ability to
attract and develop new talent.  The analyst/associate program has been the
biggest contributor to our success in this area.  Charlene Jackson, currently
leading our analyst/associate program, has taken a commercial position in
EES, account management organization.  We thank Charlene for her hard work
and many contributions to the program.  Going forward, this program will be
administered by a committee chaired by John Sherriff, CEO of Enron Europe.
The members of this committee are listed below.  Billy Lemmons, currently
Vice President of Enron Global Markets, will lead the day-to-day operations
of the program. Billy joined Enron in 1992, and has served in a variety of
commercial capacities across the company and has been an active participant
in the Associate /Analyst program.  Please join us in congratulating Billy on
his new responsibilities.

Phillip Allen	Andy Fastow	Eric Shaw
Robina Barker-Bennett	Kevin Garland	Hunter Shively
Rick Causey	Ken Rice	Stu Staley
Joe Deffner

Culture

We are combining the vision and values, diversity and corporate
responsibility committees into a single corporate culture committee chaired
by Ken Lay.  Cindy Olson, Beth Tilney and Kelly Kimberly will serve as
executive directors of this committee.  This committee will focus on
leadership and work-life issues (making it easier to attract and retain the
best talent), in addition to continuing the work of the vision and values,
diversity and corporate responsibility task forces.  The members of this
committee are as follows:

Greg Adams	Louise Kitchen	Mark Palmer
Shelley Corman	Michael Kopper	Paula Rieker
Janet Dietrich	Richard Lewis	Jeff Shankman
Jeff Donahue	Sean Long	Mitch Taylor
Gene Humphrey	Dan McCarty	Mike Terraso
Robert Jones	Jean Mrha

The Corporate Policy Committee will conduct the MD PRC and review the
recommendations of the other committees, giving substantial deference to the
decisions of those other committees.  We will be forming other committees to
deal with other significant functions, tasks and issues facing the company.


Steve

I hope this email finds you well. ?Don't know if you remember me exactly;
however, I worked at Enron for 4 years, working closely with the
Associate/Analyst Program under Charlene Jackson. ?I had to spread my wings
a bit and flew to Reliant Energy to further enhance my career.

As a former Enron employee, I know Enron-candidate material! ?I would like
to submit, confidentially of course, a resume on AJ McCormac. ?AJ is
currently the Executive Director for Workforce Planning (HR) here at
Reliant. ?She is very interested in opportunities at Enron and has the
"right stuff" to compliment your strategic direction and objectives for
Human Resources. ?I am confident that after just a few minutes with AJ you
will quickly recognize her superior expertise.

Realizing how expensive executive search firms can be, advice from a Enron
fan is free.

Thank you for your time and consideration. ?If you would like to contact
her directly here at Reliant, her number 713-207-7162.

Ginger Gamble
713-207-8824

(See attached file: AJ Confidential Resume 9-21-00.doc)
(See attached file: AJ Confidential Resume 9-21-00.doc)
 - AJ Confidential Resume 9-21-00.doc


<<Home Page - New - Risk Solutions.htm>>

Dear Vincent,

Hope all is well across the Atlantic. You may have seen this already but
thought I would pass it on just in case. Also Socgen just pulled off a
weather deal for a Japanease company looking to protect against wind damage
on their flower crop.

Weather is definatly picking up on this side too with more interest every
day.

Hope all is well,

Damian Goodburn

Office - 44 20 7847 1829
Mobile - 07971 825 309

 - Home Page - New - Risk Solutions.htm


CGoering@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving the following hours in the September 16, 2001
Real-Time Market per ECA 20010608B to verify prices:

HQ:  none
NE:  none
OH:  none
PJM: 0:00-7:00, 15:00, 17:00

All other prices in the September 16, 2001 Real-Time Market are correct.
Prices in the September 17, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


Please be informed, I will be out on vacation this Monday,  October 29.   I will be available for you, however, just call me on my cell phone (713) 822-7040 or leave me a voice mail.  I will log in from home and try to work from home as much as possible.

Thanks and have a great weekend.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


Jason,

 I have forwarded your resume with my commentary to Philippe Bibi, CEO of
Enron Networks and Robert Jones, VP of HR for ENW.  You have an impressive
resume and I hope you get a good response from Enron.

Best of luck,

Mike McConnell


Start Date: 1/14/02; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011416.txt