********* Welcome to Bestfares.com's HOT DEALS BY EMAIL ************

BESTFARES.COM is your source for HOT TRAVEL DEALS. Visit our home
page at http://www.bestfares.com. Also, remember to visit our Newsdesk
daily at http://www.bestfares.com/travel_center/desks/newsdesk.asp
where we post hundreds of deals every day that could save you up
to 70% every time you travel! Subscribe and unsubscribe information
can be found at the bottom of this newsletter.

**************************** November 16, 2000  ************************

Don,t worry about airfares going up. We,ll lock in a low fare for you for
travel through August 15, 2001. This deal includes 90 cities and the
roundtrip fare is just $298 coast-to-coast. From California (home of a
million still uncounted absentee ballots) to Florida (where political
alligators wrestle for dominance), the country is at your disposal.

COAST-TO-COAST FOR $298 ROUNDTRIP--OR LESS.
It took us a few months to negotiate our new coast-to-coast fares because
we wanted the best deal possible. No recounts here*the deal is now signed,
sealed and delivered. The airlines have given us five fare hikes this
year, as the majors try to cover higher fuel costs. Since saving money
fuels our engine, we sympathized but went on to secure maximum savings for
you. Fly coast-to-coast for $298 roundtrip or less on your choice of
several airlines. For example, if you want to fly from Burlington (VT) to
Los Angeles, the current 21-day advance purchase roundtrip is $742.
Between Seattle and Myrtle Beach, the current 21-day advance is $687. We
think you,ll agree that $298 looks a lot better. Discounts go as high as
60 percent for travel through August 15, 2001. Check out other travel Web
sites (we love competition), do some comparison shopping, and you can
understand how we,ve earned our low-fare wings and live up to the name,
Bestfares.com. For more information on our newest bargains, visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10067898

ROUNDTRIPS BETWEEN THE MIDWEST & THE EAST COAST FOR $198-218
Fly between select U.S. cities for as low as $198 roundtrip through August
15, 2001. Travel from the Midwest or the south-central part of the country
to cities in the East on great sale fares--for example, Dallas/Fort Worth
to Charlotte is only $198 at Bestfares.com vs. $418. Our wide selection of
central cities on sale includes Houston, Dallas/Fort Worth, St. Louis,
Minneapolis, Kansas City and many more. You have your choice of over 50
cities in the Eastern U.S.  These roundtrip fares range between $198 and
$218. Here,s a sample saving. The standard roundtrip fare between
Minneapolis and Portland (ME) sells for $548, but we have it for $218.
Your savings can be 60 percent or more. These prices are valid for travel
Monday through Thursday travel but for just $10 more each way, you can fly
on weekends. We went you to travel the world for less, and deals like this
make it possible. To view more of our deeply discounted fares, access
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10067898

FLORIDA ON SALE FROM 50 CITIES FOR AS LITTLE AS $198 RT
Are you looking for cheap airfares to use to escape the cold weather? Do
you want to comb the beach for seashells (or search the cities for
chads?). Soothe the late fall/early winter blues with Florida sunshine for
as little as $198 roundtrip. Fly from 50 Midwest and Eastern cities to
Jacksonville, Gainesville, Tallahassee, Orlando, Tampa, Fort Myers,
Naples, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Miami or Key West. The cheapest
published fare between Chicago and Key West in January is $418 roundtrip.
Through us, your cost is only $198. The travel period extends through
August 15, so you can buy now for next year,s spring break or summer
vacation. Check out our fantastic Florida fare sale at
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10107236

THREE-DAY ADVANCE FARES FOR $298 ROUNDTRIP OR LESS.
This is one of our favorite deals because it eliminates the high penalty
most travelers pay for last-minute trips. Our three-day advance purchase
fares are valid for travel through August 15, 2001. Now you can have peace
of mind when you need to travel with short notice--on a family emergency,
on a last-minute business trip or when an &I just have to get the heck out
of town8 mood arises. You can realize savings of up to 80 percent on these
fares and fly when you want to fly, with only a three-day advance. You can
even use this deal for the upcoming Thanksgiving holidays. For details,
visit  http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10067898

AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND ON SALE WITH UP TO $700 IN SAVINGS.
It,s nearing the official summer season Down Under, and we have some hot
deals to warm up your vacation planning. Forget about high-dollar fares of
$1,600 roundtrip or more and take this opportunity to view some of the
Best Fares to Australia and New Zealand. Please act quickly because there
are only six days left to book these specials. If you can depart through
December 11 or from December 24 through January 7, we can get you there
for only $838 roundtrip from the West Coast. Choose from Melbourne or
Sydney, Australia or Auckland, New Zealand. The fare for children ages two
through 11 is just $666 roundtrip. Fares to Brisbane begin at $938
roundtrip, $741 roundtrip for children. We also have bargain fares to
these exciting locales from other U.S. departure cities*and these fares
cover holiday travel.
For Brisbane, visit http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10106404.
For Auckland, visit http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10106403.
For Melbourne, visit http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10106402.
For Sydney, visit http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10106401.

5 DAYS LEFT TO BOOK SAN JUAN & THE CARIBBEAN FROM $180 RT
Have you been thinking about the tropics but avoided giving in to your
travel dreams because of high-season costs? Never fear--Bestfares.com is
here. We have San Juan, Puerto Rico on sale for such low prices that you
can pinch some pennies and dredge up some dollars to put your vacation
budget together. Tickets begin at just $180 roundtrip, and many of these
fares allow travel through March 31, 2001. We have specials to San Juan
from 81 U.S. cities that can save you up to half the cost of published
fares. Other Caribbean destinations on sale include St. Thomas, St.
Maarten, St. Croix and Antigua. Travel is not available December 18
through January 8. For further information, access
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10088489

LAST MINUTE HOLIDAY CRUISE BLOWOUT FROM $199
Pack your bags for some sun and fun during the holidays.  Our Partners at
Cruise.com have conjured up some great last-minute cruise deals for
November, December, and January starting from $199.  They even have space
for Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years! Why not set sail November 25,
2000 on a three-night holiday getaway to Key West departing from Tampa,
Florida for $199? Or, why not spend Christmas or New Year,s Eve on a
three-day cruise to the Bahamas departing from Miami for $199? Check out
the prices of the last-minute blowout specials below and act fast so you
won,t miss this opportunity to enjoy a little rest and relaxation over the
holidays.

From $199 - 3 Night Key West on the Regal Express (Tampa)
From $199 - 3 Day Bahamas on the Ecstasy (Miami)
From $289 - 4 Night Mexican Baja on the Viking Serenade (Los Angeles)
From $329 - 4 Day Bahamas/Caribbean on the Fantasy (Miami or Galveston)
From $329 - 4 Day Bahamas/Caribbean on the Ecstasy (Miami or Galveston)
From $329 - 4 Day Bahamas/Caribbean on the Jubilee (Miami or Galveston)
From $549 - 7 Day Southern Caribbean on the Fascination (San Juan)
From $549 - 7 Day Eastern/Western Caribbean on the Paradise (Miami)
From $549 - 7 Day Western Caribbean on the Sensation (Tampa)

After the turkey is served and all your holiday presents are bought, take
a little time to pamper yourself on a cruise. But, you must act fast
because this last-minute inventory will sell out very quickly. For full
details read our feature story at
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10107485 or call the folks at
Cruise.com at 800-821-5035

AVOID AIRPORT DELAYS & MISSED FLIGHTS THIS HOLIDAY SEASON
Are you heading toward an airport during the upcoming holidays?
Unfortunately, during this holiday season a record number of travelers
will take to the friendly skies which translates into huge crowds and
limited parking at the airport parking lots. Don,t waste valuable time
searching for an empty space in an over crowded parking lot. Just stop,
valet park, catch a shuttle and fly with our partner SunPark. SunPark is
offering spectacular holiday savings through the end of this year as low
as $6 per day.  They are also offering 20% off at all locations year-round
when you buy a convenient book of 10 pre-paid parking vouchers ) which
also makes a great gift for the frequent flyer! If you live in one of the
cities below you should check out the economy and convenience of SunPark:
 Buffalo  Columbus  Houston
 Los Angeles  Memphis  Oklahoma City
 Philadelphia St. Louis  Washington, DC

Don,t be caught in the crowds this holiday season. Park your car at a
SunPark parking lot and enjoy savings and services not found at other
airport parking lots. For more information visit our feature story at
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10107493 or visit the SunPark web
site at http://www.sunpark.com/sp_offrs.html.

THIS WEEKEND,S ONLINE TRAVEL DEALS AT A GLANCE
If you want to travel this weekend, you don,t want to spend a lot of time
checking out online bargains, site-by-site. Who has time to scroll through
dozens of e-mails that may or may not contain the deal you need? Every
Wednesday, we compile current Internet travel specials into an easy-to-use
online summary. We cover domestic and international airfares, hotels and
car rental discounts, giving you comprehensive coverage for one-stop
shopping. With one glance, you can spot the savings that suit you best and
book before the limited supplies are gone.

For This Week's Major Airline Internet Discounts,
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10107194

For This Week's Car Rental Internet Discounts,
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10107193

For This Week's U.S. & Canada Hotel Internet Discounts,
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10107192

For This Week's International Hotel Internet Discounts,
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10107191

********************************************************************

HOT DEALS BY EMAIL announcements feature special money-saving offers
available on Bestfares.com. This free, weekly newsletter is your
best bet to receive great, late-breaking travel deals.

Please feel free to send this newsletter to your colleagues, friends
and family and encourage them to sign up for a free subscription to
HOT DEALS BY EMAIL. Thanks to all of you who have already recommended
this newsletter to others. If this email has been forwarded to you,
you can get your own free subscription at:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp.

About your privacy: Our email list is used only for distribution of
our own materials. Our subscriber list will not be sold, rented, or
otherwise made available to third parties

********************************************************************

SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION

To subscribe to the HOT DEALS BY EMAIL newsletter, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp.

To unsubscribe from HOT DEALS BY EMAIL, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/unsubscribe.asp

To change your email address, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/unsubscribe.asp
and unsubscribe from Hot Deals. Then go to:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp
and register your new email address.

Although every effort is made to ensure accurate information,
Bestfares.com is not responsible for any errors in this newsletter.


The best summary of what is going on here that I have read recently:

http://www.infoxpress.com/reviewtracker/reprints.asp?page_id=814


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Seely, Michael
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 5:52 PM
To:	Coulter, Kayne
Subject:	Associate

Kayne,

In speaking with the Associate / Analyst program today they informed me that you may still have a position open for an associate.  I am in the process of finishing up a rotation on the EBS trading floor and would be interested in speaking with you further if this position is still open.  Please find my attached resume, and I will contact you within the week.

Thanks,

Michael Seely
Global Bandwidth Risk Management
Enron Broadband Services
EB4456E
Direct - 713 853-1404
Cell - 713 775-6463
Fax - 713 646-8795
Michael_Seely@enron.net


ELCON commercial practices group[


you're now appearing on fliers!!!  What's next?  Movies?  A supporting role
w/ Arnold??  :-) kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/18/2001
07:02 PM ---------------------------

Sandra Yamane <SYamane@marathon-com.com> on 05/18/2001 01:28:43 PM
To: "'karen.denne@enron.com'" <karen.denne@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Power Player Lunch Meeting Notice

Karen:
Here is a copy of the LA Chamber flier for the June 5th energy event
featuring Jeff Dasovich

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffe, Jerald A. [mailto:jeffjera@lachamber.org]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: 'syamane@marathon-com.com'
Subject: Power Player Lunch Meeting Notice

 <<Energy Crisis - Power Player Speaker.doc>>

 For further communications on this matter, talk to Melissa Infusino.
I just helped out on the flyer while she was out of town.

 - Energy Crisis - Power Player Speaker.doc


Patrice attached is a draft of a Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for Kaztex Energy Management.  Please give me a call if I can be of further assistance.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Desk	 Short Term Northwest	 Short Term California	 Short Term Southwest
Flow Date	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001	 10/5/2001
Deal Number	  	  	  	 9/9/4102
Delivery Point	 NO DEALS TO REAL TIME	 SP	  	  	 NO DEALS TO REAL TIME
CTPY	  	  	  	 CA Imbalance
MWH	  	  	  	 12
Position	  	  	  	 Short
Hours	  	  	  	 Peak
Price	  	  	  	  $                  24.13

 	 Short Term Northwest	 Short Term California	 Short Term Southwest
1	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
2	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
3	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
4	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
5	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
6	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
7	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
8	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
9	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
10	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
11	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
12	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
13	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
14	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
15	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
16	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
17	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
18	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
19	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
20	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
21	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
22	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(12.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
23	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
24	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
Total	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	(192.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00


Below are filings that EPMI and EES will make next week.  Once granted by
FERC, they will allow EPMI and EES to perform some regulatory filings and
functions on behalf of the industrials.  An industrial selling into the grid
will still be considered a "licensed power marketer", but we can handle many
of the tasks, thus making it easier for them to sell to Enron, rather than
another power marketer that has not filed this application at FERC.

I talked to Kevin about this last night, and we discussed the fact that this
FERC authorization WILL NOT allow the industrial to circumvent its host
utility tariff.  Therefore, if the industrial is restricted from selling
power from its on-site generator to the grid by the host tariff, FERC will
not override that.  (FERC made that clear in the initial 'InPower" filing in
response to a request from JEA.)  For example, several years ago at Jim
Fallon's request, we checked the HLP tariff and found that it restricted EPMI
from selling power to the grid from the generators in the Enron building
basement.

While Kevin thinks that this can be a valuable filing, he is concerned that
many utility sales tariffs restrict power sales to the grid from on-site
generators.  In addition, Mark Dobler and John Berger are working at EES on
distributed generation solutions and could be restricted from the optionality
that grid sales provide vs. use of distributed generation on site.

It seems that we may want to focus some state resources on making sure that
the utility tariffs, especially in open access retail states, provide for
maximum flexibility for industrial customers.

Let me know if you would like me to visit with Mark Dobler about this or
provide other assistance.  Thanks.  Christi

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
09:51 AM ---------------------------

"Kimberly Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com> on 02/08/2001 03:50:44 PM
To: <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: InPower-type filings

Christi,

Attached are clean copy and redlined version of the EPMI and EES filings.

137355 - EES clean copy
MBR.wpd - redline of EES filing
133268 - EPMI clean copy
MBR.wpd - redline of EPMI filing

 - 0137355.01
 - MBR1.WPD
 - 0133268.02
 - MBR.WPD


Start Date: 1/13/02; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011302.txt


I have volunteered for Nov 3/4.

	Mark E Haedicke
	10/25/2000 09:21 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia
Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Associate/Analyst Super Saturday Participation - ADDITIONAL REQUEST

Please see if you and/or AGC's in your respective groups can make time to
participate.  I have always found it to be a very rewarding experience.  Let
me know.   Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 09:17 AM -----

	Shelly Jones, Recruiting Manager@ENRON
	Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
	10/24/2000 09:12 PM

		 To: ENA Employees
		 cc:
		 Subject: Associate/Analyst Super Saturday Participation - ADDITIONAL REQUEST

 ADDITIONAL INTERVIEWER PARTICIPATION IS REQUESTED FOR OCTOBER 28 & NOVEMBER
4.

Also, please note the school/date changes (in red).  This change was
necessary due to the number of candidates participating in Super Saturday.
If you have a change in your participation as a result of the date change,
please contact John Harrison, ext. 3-7811 for revisions.

Thank you
Shelly Jones

******************************************************************************
*************************************************

Enron Managing Directors, Vice Presidents, Directors, and Managers  Who
Utilize the Associate/Analyst Pool

As a follow up from a "SAVE THE DATE"  email regarding your participation in
the  Associate and Analyst  Super Saturday process, now is the time to select
your dates to attend and participate.

Below are the dates for Super Saturday weekends during the upcoming
recruiting season.  If you are Houston-based or if you know you will be in
Houston on business at the appropriate times please click the link below to
volunteer.

http://axis.enron.com/notice/ssinvite.asp
(When selecting dates please avoid selecting to interview candidates who
attend the schools for which you are a team member.)

Associates     Analysts
October 27-28, 2000    November 3-4
Thunderbird, UT, Georgetown, Rice  Rice, UT, Baylor, A&M, OU, Florida, LSU,
UHCL

November 10-11, 2000    November, 17-18, 2000
Columbia, Stern NYU, UCLA, Darden, Cornell Penn, UVA, Vanderbilt, Michigan,
Howard, AUC,
Vanderbilt, Michigan    UHMain and Clear Lake, LSU

December, 1-2, 2000    December 8-9, 20000
Chicago, Kellogg, Harvard, Wharton, MIT Wellesley, overflow and re-schedules
from previous s/s
-
Friday, December 15, 2000
Carnegie Mellon
Yale off-cycle candidates

Thank you for your support of the Associate and Analyst Programs.
Shelly Jones
Recruiting Manager


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Peter Melera <pmelera@calpine.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Peter+20Melera+20+3Cpmelera+40calpine+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:54 AM
To:	'dschool@enron.com'; West Real Time Group
Subject:	southpoint

 - Southpoint Gas Model.xls


What's Next for
Enron Federal Credit Union

Over the years, Enron Federal Credit Union has been proud to share the Enron name and support many wonderful employees and their family members around the world.  Here are some of the exciting changes slated for the Credit Union in the coming months.

New Name
We believe it is important to change our name for the sake of our members and our organization. Our new name will reflect everything that we stand for: trustworthiness, outstanding service, innovative products, value and convenience. You can expect to hear about our official new name later this month.

Expanded Field of Membership
Also, being a single sponsor Credit Union for Enron Corp., it has become necessary to expand our field of membership. We continue to welcome and serve current Enron employees and their families, but we will now also invite individuals and businesses that live, work or worship in Downtown Houston and the surrounding areas to become members of our Credit Union.

Additional Location
Another immediate area of focus for the Credit Union is our location. We have made plans to open an additional full-service facility that will be located in close proximity to the Enron Building in the downtown area with easy access. More information about our new location will be announced as soon as it becomes available. At this time, our current office facility will remain open and accessible for all of our members.

We are excited about the changes that 2002 will bring and look forward to sharing the experience with each of our members.


We have re-drafted various sections of this to incorporate Steve's comments.
So I think we are finally there.

What's next??

Seabron

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com

 - 01-07-07-SA Draft policy paper - revised.doc


Here is Part I of the Staff report (on Calfornia).


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2000
08:56 AM ---------------------------

"Network World" <Networkworld@nwwsubscribe.com> on 02/15/2000 08:36:42 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Network World E-Mail Confirmation 2/15/00

Thank you Wincenty for choosing Network World's E-Mail
Newsletters. You have just hand-picked the most concise,
accurate and timely technology email alerts in the industry.

You are currently subscribed to:

Network World Product Review of the Week
Application Services Providers
Storage in the Enterprise
Security and Bug Patch Alert
Novell NetWare
Linux
Whitepapers Download

Please note that the newsletters are scheduled to begin this March.

While waiting for your newsletters to arrive come visit us at
http://www.nwfusion.com and be part of Networking's most active online
community.

Are you a Network World print subscriber?  It's FREE! Go to
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/wb16 and apply to receive
51 issues of Network World the weekly magazine that is
"The leader in network knowledge"!


Just an update on the testing front... O
-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Regan M.
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Allen, Thresa A.; Anderson, Bridgette; Anderson, Diane; Aucoin, Evelyn; Baker, Natalie; Baxter, Bryce; Bentley, Corry; Bowen, Bob; Brackett, Debbie R.; Campos, Anthony; Campos, Sylvia A.; Dahlke, Andrea; Dawes, Cheryl; Denny, Jennifer; Denton, Rhonda L.; Dupuy, Mark; Elledge, Susan; Engel, Tom; Evans, Casey; Garcia, Clarissa; Gillis, Brian; Hare, Bill D.; Hayden, Frank; Heal, Kevin; Hunter, Larry Joe; Huntley, Kelley; Jaquet, Tammy; Kenne, Dawn C.; Lozano, Melba; Mcginnis, Stephanie; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Meredith, Kevin; Murphy, Melissa; Price, Wade R.; Reeves, Kathy; Robinson, Rhonda; Rodriguez, Bernice; Schield, Elaine; Schrab, Mark L.; Seib, Dianne; Severson, Russ; Spears, Christopher; Stevens, Mechelle; Sullivan, Patti; Sweitzer, Tara; Theriot, Kim S.; Vander velde, Nikole; Wallumrod, Ellen; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Wynne, Rita; Bharathi, Jaikishore; Boudreaux, Lori; Brewer, Charles; Chitradurga, Sundar; Cinelli, Steve; Clark, Cynthia; Fortney, Bill; Franks, Shawn; Greig, Iain; Henry, Jane Hilburn; Hunter, Wade; Johnson, Jeff; Krishnaswamy, Jayant; Lim, Francis S.; Martinez, Bob; McKeel, Richard; Nolte, Ron; Pena, Matt; Poston, David; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Rao, Ramesh; Saleem, Aftab; Sanvido, Terry; Schmidt, Mark; Schomer, Chris; Smith, Regan M.; Stock, Steve; Brockhan, Richard; Blaylock Jr., Samuel
Subject: Monday 01/28 - Status report of integration testing, remaining, outstanding issues, going forward

Everyone - updates from testing last week, and communication of information/ going forward.

Thanks to all involved in last weeks testing.  Much has been accomplished.  We did encounter a legal mandated 'test freeze' on Friday given a legal communication came down to halt all data entry/ code changes, but as of Friday evening, it was eventually lifted.  Any unfinished testing can continue.

We've completed:
- Integration testing of 25 transaction type scenarios - from EOL entry, Sitara, TDS, Tagg.  This includes the sample testing of scripts, and the end to end testing to SAP.
- EOL has sent 13 gas and 4 financial transactions through downstream systems.
- Over 50 integration issues identified and resolved!  Majority were data setup issues, but code changes were identified, incorrect hardware being used, reports not running, start-up scripting issues resolved, replication issues resolved.

What's remaining to test and status:
1) EDI testing - Tammy Jaquet, Robert Virnau are expected to complete the EDI test by end of day today (01/28)
2) Financial Settlements/ EOL deals - Mechelle Stevens is completing her verification of EOL deals into Unify.  Testing is expected to complete the EDI test by end of day today (01/28).
3) SAP testing - SAP is still in requirements analysis with regards to GL account setup, profit centers.  A meeting is scheduled for Wednesday afternoon with the UBS, SAP, Netco leads.  SAP testing can be conducted between Unify and within SAP once decisions are determined.

Any other issues we are not aware of, please advise.

Outstanding known issues:
1) Unify custom reports (SQR) not working.  This was not part of integration test, but testing by Kelley Huntley on Friday resulted in failure.  Infrastructure expected to resolve by Monday noon.
2) There is some data setup that is being completed Monday morning and should be complete by now.

Any other issues we are not aware of, please advise.

Going forward:
1) The Netco EOL (or new OLT?) team will be testing all week deals into Netco environments.  You may see these in downstream systems.
2) Analysis of what estate data still resides in Netco, and what needs to be there to go forward.  Namely curve data for EnPower.
3) We will perform regression testing to determine if there are any cross dependency of hardware.  Testing scenarios include:
    a) Application messaging that use Tibco (port, multi-cast addresses)
    b) Estate execution with Netco hardware inactive
    c) Netco execution with Estate hardware inactive

Notice/ FYI - All Netco (UBS) employee's LAN NT user-id's will be changed to a new file server (anticipated Friday 02/01).
The impacts are mainly the O:\ drive, W:\ drive will be split between Estate and Netco.  All authorized (legal) data is being copied now to the new file servers.
For example, if Netco employees need specific files on the O:\ drive, if they are missing, they would have remained with estate.  If you have files in progress, they
may missing the batch file copy which is occurring this week.

Updates to follow later this week!

Regan Smith
Energy Operations Systems
Enron Net Works
713-853-9291 (wk); 281-850-7551 (cell)

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Regan M.
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 8:42 PM
To: Allen, Thresa A.; Anderson, Bridgette; Anderson, Diane; Aucoin, Evelyn; Baker, Natalie; Baxter, Bryce; Bentley, Corry; Bowen, Bob; Brackett, Debbie R.; Campos, Anthony; Campos, Sylvia A.; Dahlke, Andrea; Dawes, Cheryl; Denny, Jennifer; Denton, Rhonda L.; Dupuy, Mark; Elledge, Susan; Engel, Tom; Evans, Casey; Garcia, Clarissa; Gillis, Brian; Hare, Bill D.; Hayden, Frank; Heal, Kevin; Hunter, Larry Joe; Huntley, Kelley; Jaquet, Tammy; Kenne, Dawn C.; Lozano, Melba; Mcginnis, Stephanie; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Meredith, Kevin; Murphy, Melissa; Price, Wade R.; Reeves, Kathy; Robinson, Rhonda; Rodriguez, Bernice; Schield, Elaine; Schrab, Mark L.; Seib, Dianne; Severson, Russ; Spears, Christopher; Stevens, Mechelle; Sullivan, Patti; Sweitzer, Tara; Theriot, Kim S.; Vander velde, Nikole; Wallumrod, Ellen; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Wynne, Rita; Bharathi, Jaikishore; Brewer, Charles; Chitradurga, Sundar; Cinelli, Steve; Elwood, Richard; Fortney, Bill; Franks, Shawn; Greig, Iain; Henry, Jane Hilburn; Hunter, Wade; Johnson, Jeff; Lim, Francis S.; Martinez, Bob; McKeel, Richard; Nolte, Ron; Pena, Matt; Poston, David; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Rao, Ramesh; Saleem, Aftab; Sanvido, Terry; Schmidt, Mark; Schomer, Chris; Smith, Regan M.; Stock, Steve; Clark, Cynthia; Boudreaux, Lori
Subject: Status report of integration testing from Wednesday, Jan. 23rd ; and Thursday's continuation..

Status report of integration testing from Wednesday, Jan. 23rd
    - (16 gas/ power types of transactions to test)

Overall, there were no infrastructure or major application issues.  Unlike the prior testing, we've included many more gas transaction types and testing with all non-essential Netco data removed (aka baseline for Netco go-live).

In today's test, we had numerous data setup related issues  that resulted in downtime (ie EOL- Dynegy information, TGP address information, bad credit counterparty/ contracts,  or database issues with data sync/ replication).   These were mainly attributed to the massive cleanup/ removal of data not needed.  The  remaining issues open are being addressed Wednesday night.

Given the deferred 12:00pm to 2:00pm start time and data setup/ sync issues, we were unable to complete downstream processes (mainly Settlements, confirmations, SAP).

Continuation of testing into Thursday
We are requesting the testers with tasks remaining to complete the script execution Thursday (morning shift and afternoon shifts given UBS offsite meetings).
We will try to balance the testing activities given some will be out in the morning, and some in the afternoon.  The bridgeline will be active from 9 - 5 for communication/ status.

RECAP of where testing left off for Netco and EOL entry.

---> NETCO Deal types (with Netco external gas/power (good & bad credit)
Financial    All financial testing completed!

Power
Wednesday
    - Completed tasks:  Deal Entry, settlement statement group setup, notification, EnPower deal load.  Awaiting settlements drafting issue.
Thursday (remaining & status)
    (1)  DCAF testing ready
    (2) Kelley Huntley to draft invoices after draft issue resolved.

Gas
Wednesday
    - Completed tasks:  Deal Entry in TDS, TAGG/ ERMS, Sitara.  Port Calc

Thursday
    - (Chris Spears) - Transport - The TGP payment methods are now setup.
    - (Clarissa Hanks)  - Transport usage ticket for generic contract is setup (Deal 20000082)
    - ( Wade Price) - To draft invoices after confirmation of activity upstream (pm)
    - DCAF testing after confirmation of activity upstream
    - Need to conduct the EDI test (Tammy Jaquet/ Robert Virnau)

---> EOL Deals (Dawn Kenne has confirmed 4 EOL deals were setup.  2 Gas, 2 Power)

Thursday's plans are to confirm the flow of these deals into  Sitara, Tagg/ EnPower. Followed by eventual confirmations, settlement through Unify and SAP.  These are ready now for validation by Sitara/ Tagg/ EnPower.

Thanks to your continued involvement ...

Regan Smith
Energy Operations Systems
Enron Net Works
713-853-9291 (wk); 281-850-7551 (cell)


This is a copy of your message sent to ACVance@talkmatch.com -->

Hello,

I was surfing through the pictures on this web site and ran across yours.  I found you to be extremely attractive and your interests to be similar to mine.  That is except for your religious match, are you really looking for a Buddhist?  Anyway take a look at my profile and drop me a line if there is any interest.  I hope to hear from you soon!

Paul

Click the following link to view the sender's profile:
http://www.match.com/doubleblind/showprofile.asp?UserID=484948454C4B4E&trackingid=0

The following is my profile text:

Hello, I'm a down to earth person that likes to laugh and have a good time. I work in downtown Denver as a commodities trader for a large energy trading house. I do enjoy my career but understand life needs to be kept in prospective and be balanced. I enjoy activities over sitting and watching, but I have been known to sit in front of the TV and watch football or college basketball all day. I'm looking for someone who enjoys life and doesn't take themselves too seriously.

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.


I agree with Bob that the reporting issues are important.  I also think that focusing on the "lessons learned" from the NE RTO and SE RTO mediation would be interesting.  Have people from different industry groups discussing their views of where the mediations concluded (assuming we are finished by October).  Any outstanding issues between EPSA members and between EPSA and other parts of the industry could be discussed.

Thanks,

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Reilley, Robert R." <breilley@coral-energy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Reilley+2C+20Robert+20R+2E+22+20+3Cbreilley+40coral-energy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:26 AM
To:	'Julie Simon'; jsteffe@enron.com
Cc:	Erin Perrigo; Jack Cashin; Jackie Gallagher; Mark Bennett; Michael Reddy
Subject:	RE: October Membership Meeting

I'll certainly give it more thought, but I think that a discussion of
reporting requirements would be timely.  The NOPR on power transaction and
contracts is out there, but has not got much attention yet due to the press
of California issues and the RTO negotiations.  Also, on October 1, entities
selling gas in California have to make their first monthly report to FERC on
purchases, sales, and transportation contracts.  Additionally, the DOE has
changed some of its annual reporting requirements.  In all cases,
confidentiality is an issue, and I believe that it is handled differently
for each of these reports.  A discussion of all these requirements from a
practical "how to" or "do's and don'ts" perspective might not be sexy, but
it would be useful to us preoccupied regulatory slugs...

-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Simon [mailto:JSIMON@epsa.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Reilley, Robert R.; jsteffe@enron.com
Cc: Erin Perrigo; Jack Cashin; Jackie Gallagher; Mark Bennett; Michael
Reddy
Subject: October Membership Meeting

Do either of you have any suggestions for topics to focus on at the
Regulatory Affairs Committee Meeting in October?  At the last meeting we
talked about market-based rate issues; the one before that, gas issues.  We
had thought of a "dialogue" with some senior FERC staff and a few of our
members about big picture issues, but haven't been able to organize it.  We
could try that again.  Or, what about interconnection issues or information
collection/disclosure, since those seem to be rocketing up FERC's priority
list.  Any suggestions?


Yesterday afternoon the Board adopted staff recommendations to:

* Regulation W - request comment on Regulation W that would
comprehensively implement sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act.
This proposed regulation would confirm Board and staff interpretations,
revise other previous staff opinions, proposes several additional
exemptions, and addresses new topics under sections 23A and 23B.
* Section 23B - issue interim final regulations, with a delayed
effective date of January 1, 2002 that would: 1)clarify that
institution-affiliate derivative transactions are subject to the market
terms requirement of Section 23B;  2)require that banks maintain policies
and procedures reasonably designed to monitor, manage and control credit
exposures to affiliates arising from derivative transactions and intraday
extensions of credit with affiliates. The policies and procedures must at a
minimum monitor and control the credit exposure arising from the
institution's derivative transactions with each affiliate, and all
affiliates in the aggregate, ensuring that the institution's derivative
transactions with affiliates comply with Section 23B
* Section 23A - the application of section 23A appears to be addressed
in two forms.  Regulation W proposes a set of questions on measures that
could be applied to institution-affiliate derivative transactions under
section 23A.  Additionally, the Board is also requesting public comment on
the most appropriate treatment of derivative transactions between banks and
affiliates under section 23A through the interim final rule.

The comment period for proposed Regulation W and the interim final rule on
sections 23A and 23B is 90 days from issuance in the Federal Register which
has not yet occurred. The full text of the Board Memo and proposed rules can
be accessed through www.federalreserve.gov. I have included a shortcut to
the site below.  The relevant regulations are included under item 2.
Proposals regarding Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act.  2a. is
Regulation W  and 2b. is the Interim Final Rule on 23A and 23B.  In case the
shortcut does not work go to General Information -- then: Board Meetings --
then: May 2, 2001. Please call if you have any questions.  Many thanks!
 <<Open meeting memoranda.url>>

Stacy Carey
Policy Director
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY  10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
scarey@isda.org

 - Open meeting memoranda.url


I hope life takes you where ever you need to go and you find what you need.
Good luck on your journey.

Mitesh Master


Tomorrow is the final day to schedule December barrels, and we are currently short 1,220,000 barrels.  We have exhausted all measures of buying crude including: settling sales financially, buying from companies where we have short positions, and selling physical puts.  As a group, we have reduced our short physical position from over 10 million barrels to 1.2 under extremely difficult credit terms.  We believe we cannot cover the remaining 1.2 without prepaying a counterparty.  This requires a cash infusion of approximately $22,631,000 (1,220 X $18.55/barrel).

Every effort will be made within the next 24 hours to reduce this position, but the outlook is not bright.  Please let me know as soon as possible what can be made available to us.

Sincerely,

Rob Fuller


Attached is the basic form of service agreement we are going to use for the
two individuals we discussed.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 09/22/99 08:59 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shonnie Daniel                           09/21/99 06:40 PM

To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Consulting Agreement

---------------------- Forwarded by Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT on 09/21/99 06:40
PM ---------------------------

Twanda Sweet
09/16/99 03:55 PM
To: Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Consulting Agreement

 Click on this data document to find the data source.
Consulting Agreement


dirty!!!!!


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000
10:02 AM ---------------------------

"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 11/15/2000 08:42:58 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Good morning

Vince,

Attached you will find a draft "thought document" based on our
conversations yesterday.  I think that it captures much of my
recollections.  Please edit it to your liking and pass it back to me.  In
the next steps I have laid out a plan of action that should lead us to a
successful conclusion and a draft by Christmas.

Let me emphasize that this is a working document so feel free to modify it
in whatever ways you think appropriate (don't be bashful--I want us to get
this right).

Have a great day.

Your friend,

John

 - EnronInterview.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


One more thing, if you are unable to attend the meeting you need to email
either Courtney Votaw (cvotaw@yahoo.com) or Stacey Rozell
(stacey.e.rozzell@us.authuranderson.com) by next Friday, March 22nd.

If you notify Courtney/Stacey it will count as an excused absence (you get 3
a year, I think), but if you don't, it will count as an unexcused absence.

Let me know if you have any questions...

Beth

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Wherry, Beth
> Sent:	Friday, March 15, 2002 10:48 AM
> To:	'allison.furr@ey.com'; 'amanda_callaway@hchd.tmc.edu';
> 'autumn_hugo@bmc.com'; 'bhouston@kpmg.com'; 'britt.davis@gwl.com';
> 'brooke.shuford@usoncology.com'; 'chmintner@hotmail.com';
> 'jenmoore19@yahoo.com'; 'jenniferwingo@hotmail.com';
> 'jennylivesay@hotmail.com'; 'jocelyngrisham@hotmail.com';
> 'ksteinbrueck@apqc.org'; 'kblivesay@yahoo.com'; 'libbie.woolsey@scgo.com';
> 'lebuckley@tmh.tmc.edu'; 'marcie.watson@ey.com';
> 'megriffin77@hotmail.com'; 'mary.b.green@am.pnu.com';
> 'nannadiaz@hotmail.com'; 'morrm@hotmail.com';
> 'stephanie_withers@hotmail.com'; 'sunny.mcmillan@bakerbotts.com';
> 'susan.m.scott@enron.com'; 'tarahoyt@aol.com'; 'tracey.reilly@enform.com'
> Cc:	'cvotaw@yahoo.com'; 'maryrebecca.harp@reliant.com'
> Subject:	NCL Meeting - Monday, March 25th
> Importance:	High
>
> New NCL Juniors,
>
> Our first meeting of the year will be held Monday, March 25th from 7pm-8pm
> at:
>
> St. Luke's UMC, Room B143 (The Parlor)
> 3471 Westheimer at Edloe
> Houston, TX  77027
> (713)-622-5710
>
> I'm in the process of adding you all to our Yahoo! Calendar, so you should
> be receiving a meeting reminder next week.  All future meeting times will
> be sent to you through our NCL Juniors Yahoo! Calendar.
>
> See everyone on the 25th!
>
> Beth Wherry
> Continental Airlines, Inc.
> Sr. Analyst, Corporate Programs
> * Work: (713) 324-9722
> *  Fax: (713) 324-6378
> * Email: bwherr@coair.com
>


Janette:

Please order a new IBM laptop computer for Linda Guinn as soon as possible
and charge to my RC 0630.  If you have any questions, feel free to contact me
or Linda.

Thanks.

Richard Sanders


Scott/Stephen, I'm trying to summarize the essence of these performance
guarantees, similiar to what I have for heat rate.  I'm sure I've got
something on output and probably reliability, but can you give me a thumb
nail sketch of what we are looking for on the rest?

10.3.1   Heat Rate Guarantee.  Seller guarantees that the Heat Rate as
measured for each of the Units
as demonstrated during the Performance Test, shall be __BTU/kWh. In the event
the Heat Rate exceeds the Minimum Heat Rate Guarantee, Seller shall take all
necessary actions to correct, retest the deficient Unit and cause the
deficient Unit to meet the Minimum Heat Rate Guarantee.  Failure to meet the
Heat Rate Guarantee shall prevent Acceptance, unless Purchaser explicitly
waives this guarantee in writing.

{we have a definition of heat rate}

10.3.2   Electrical Output Guarantee.

10.3.3   Emissions Guarantee.

10.3.4   Water Consumption Guarantee.

10.3.5 Sound Guarantee.

10.3.6 Reliability.

Thanks,

Kay


please ask you groups to participate, and spread the word.  Thanks.  Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000
03:22 PM ---------------------------

Eric Thode@ENRON
10/25/2000 01:06 PM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert P Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne
Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Burnett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V
Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Hermans/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tim
Battaglia/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Help Improve ENA's, EGM's and EIM's Participation in The Pulse!

The opportunity to provide feedback via The Pulse ends on Friday, October 27
and we need your help to improve our participation rate.  I have attached the
latest figures below, but in a nutshell, only 52.76% of our employees have
participated, which is below the company average.

We would like to do a lot better.

Here are the business unit participation rates:

EES   90.63%
Enron India  85.71%
Enron Wind  81.85%
Net Works  71.35%
EE&CC   66.67%
NEPCO   59.95%
Corporate  58.74%
Enron South America 58.24%

COMPANY AVERAGE 54.64%

ENA/EGM/EIM  52.76%
ETS (formerly GPG) 49.59%
Enron Europe  39.95%
EBS   39.07%
APACHI  26.90%

On behalf of Mark Frevert, I would like to ask each of you to personally
encourage your direct reports to log on to the system at survey.enron.com and
provide the much needed feedback.  Whether you send an e-mail, use a staff
meeting or walk around to your employees' desks, we need you to let them know
that the survey is important to Enron and we would appreciate their
feedback.  While many fear some sort of response tracking, please remind them
that their responses are completely confidential.

If you have any questions, please call me at ext. 3-9053.

Operating Company:

ENA/EGM/EIM    1,213
Total employee only email invitations sent: 2,299
Percent complete:    52.76%

Results by Group within Operating Company:

Commercial - Origination  225
Risk Management and Trading 213
Energy Operations   205
Bus. An. & Rep./Fin. Ops.  154
Other/None of the Above  153
Legal    89
Gas Assets   50
Human Resources   41
Tax    29
Technology/IT   28


Jennifer;

Just a little more info with regard to the San Diego rate freeze
legislation.  SB 43 (the Alpert bill) was signed by the Governor April 6 and
filed with the Secretary of State April 9.  The language in the bill provides
that the frozen rate would apply to the energy component of electric bills
for electricity supplied to all customers by SDG&E not subject to the ceiling
imposed by existing law (ie residential, small commercial and street
lighting).  Review of that language would imply the rate freeze would not
apply to direct access customers.  One caveat however.  The CPUC must now
implement the passed legislation through its regulations.  While the intent
of the legislation seems clear, the past record of the CPUC in implementing
such legislative acts does not provide 100% assurance that logic will prevail.

As a footnote to the above, AB 43 (Correa - passing the Assembly and Senate
April 5) is a "companion clean-up" bill to SB 43.  This bill is almost
identical to SB 43 but reflects some limited technical corrections to SB 43.
To our knowledge, as of yesterday, AB 43 had not been signed by the Governor.

In addition, there have been repeated questions with regard to the
applicability of the 3 cent surcharge to direct access customers.
Unfortunately, the status of its applicability is still up in the air.
Various parties have raised this issue directly with the CPUC and in their
comments with respect to the rate design phase of its implementation and will
be one of the issues to be addressed (though perhaps not answered) next week
in the Commission's rate design hearing.

If you could forward this to the rest of the CA team it would be appreciated.


Which IRA is right for you?

Whether you are saving for a new home, college, or retirement,
Enron Federal Credit Union offers
Traditional, Roth, and Education IRAs to fit your needs.

12 Month Term IRA Certificate	2.75% APY
24 Month Term IRA Certificate	3.25% APY
36 Month Term IRA Certificate	3.75% APY
IRA Savings				1.75% APY

An IRA Savings Account can be opened with only $25,
or open a Term IRA Certificate with $500.

To set up an IRA or for more information,
please visit www.enronfcu.com
or call 713.853.6902.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Per my discussion with Joann, it looks like we have covered this 240 dth at
meter 80-03 on CGAS.


You know me...any excuse to celebrate.  Name a time and place...amazingly my
calendar appears to be open tomorrow night.

Wilson Kriegel@ENRON
04/19/2000 10:07 AM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: What does the future hold?

thanks, for the email. i liked it...
very true...
but hey i'm not out of Enron yet,...and the physical move will be in a little
while....so we have time to party and have some good times/
before i move...
Still think we should take Ben out for a dink tomorrow, unless you have a
date?


IEP Team,
Attached is a revised January CalJournal ad for your review. Based on
the group's comments, which were significant, we have developed an
entirely new ad. However, since the deadline has not changed (art is
still due today), we need your feedback asap. Please e-mail or call me
at 916-447-8186 as soon as possible with any comments. If we do not hear
from you, we will assume you are fine with the ad as is. Thank you for
all of your help.
Kelli

 - Cal Journal Ad (Series #1).pdf


Here are my thoughts so far:

1.  Initial Legal Team -- Jeff Hodge, Jim Keller, Carol St. Clair, Aaron
Rothwarg

2.  Spot Check the Forms -- over the next week

3.  Conform Forms to ENA Forms -- over next two months

4.  Develop Form Approval Process -- dual approvals by EES and ENA

5.  Develop Deal Approval Process -- deals above a certain size (or material
variations from the form) would require concurrent EWS approval

6.  Request List of Major Contract Concerns from Traders -- items that cannot
be hedged


Attached is a paper that was filed at the FERC by Paul Joskow and Ed Kahn.  I
assume it was attached to SCE's comments in the FERC price caps proceeding.

This study appears to be the most definite analysis so far of the question:
did market fundamentals or generator market power cause the price run-ups
this summer?  Joskow/Kahn conclude that although much of the run up was due
to gas prices and NOx costs, that the market was unworkably competitive;
i.e., the cost run ups do not fully explain the price run ups.  Further, they
provide what they claim is evidence that individual generators withheld this
summer.

Joskow/Kahn state: "Moreover, there is considerable empirical
evidence to support a presumption that the high prices experienced in the
summer of
2000 were the product of deliberate actions on the part of generators or
marketers
controlling the dispatch of generating capacity to withhold supply and
increase market
prices."  Biggest withholders in their analysis are: AES/Williams, Reliant,
and Dynegy

Marketer/traders are largely but not completely spared criticism in their
analysis.  Joskow/Kahn recommend that FERC staff undertake a study of the
entire WSCC data to "Determine the role of marketers in the production and
bidding behavior of the California generators." and to find out more why CA
imports fell.

It will be interesting to see how the CA generators react to this study.

My initial read is that this is will be received as an important, influential
work.  It will fuel the fire for more information release, especially by the
UDCs and CA regulators--at least release of physical operational data.

I would be interested in your reaction to the study.  In terms of potential
criticisms: I noticed that their gas prices might be low (used monthly
average data rather than daily).  They also did not account for generator
marginal profit or margin recovery to account for possible outages and
noncontiguous schedules.   Finally, they do not examine the benefits that
would have accrued had additional capacity come on line.

Alan Comnes


Shannon L. Burnham is confirmed for a telephone interview on Wednesday, June 6, 2001 @ 10:00am CST and she can be reached at (225-931-8111).  (Shannon) Is a candidate for a (Summer Intern) and I have attached her resume for your reference.

Thank You,

Lydia,

x3-9338


Ken, Mark, and Greg:  a thoughtful piece regarding Dabhol by The Hindu.  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leach, Doug
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:21 AM
To:	Lundstrom, Bruce; Walls Jr., Rob; Derrick Jr., James
Subject:	FW: Article sent from The Hindu

fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	thehindu@admin.hinduonnet.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	undisclosed-recipients:;@ENRON
Subject:	Article sent from The Hindu

An interesting article.  Could it happen?
=============================================================
This article is emailed to you by tushar s. dhruv ( tushar.dhruv@enron.com )
=============================================================
Source: The Hindu (http://www.hinduonnet.com)

Dabhol and the do nothing Government

By Prem Shankar Jha

Ever since the Vajpayee's Government came to power more than two
and a half years ago, the economy has been sliding relentlessly
into the deepest recession it has ever known. In the nine months
since December industrial growth has averaged 1.7 per cent. The
decade when it averaged 9 per cent and the months, only five
years ago, when it touched 16.2 per cent, are now but a distant
memory. Consumer demand was utterly flat before the September 11
terrorist strikes in the U.S. It has now shrunk dramatically -
vehicle sales dropped by 20 percent in September and colour TV
sets registered a growth of a measly 3 to 4 per cent. With no
demand to power it, inflation, measured by the consumer price
index, has fallen almost to zero. The share market is dead and
there is no fresh investment. Employment in the organised sector
is shrinking in absolute terms for the first time in human
memory.

In the past three years two million new job seekers have tried to
find a place, however humble, in the organised sector of the
economy but been turned away. By 2004, the number will have risen
by another three million. But Mr. Yashwant Sinha is confident
that a good monsoon will revive demand and by itself solve all of
the country's problems.

But one recent event highlights the government's paralysis more
sharply than any ream of statisitcs can ever do. This is its
failure to react to the defeat in a London Consumer court of the
Maharashtra State Electricity Boards's attempt to foil Enron's
bid to take it before an international arbitration court by
claiming that a case was pending before an Indian court
challenging the arbitration clause in the power purchase
agreement.

The London Court correctly maintained that just as a government's
international obligations as defined by the Treaty or the
agreement supercede its obligations under domestic law,
proceedings in an international court must take precedence over
those in a domestic court. The way has, therefore, been cleared
for India to face the humiliation of being dragged before an
international tribunal for a breach of it contractual
obligations.

Given the fearsome proficiency of Enron's lawyers, both those
whom they retain and those who drafted the power purchase
agreement, it is virtually a foregone conclusion that the MSEB
will lose the case. If that happens, then by a conservative
estimate, India will have to pay around $5 billion, in costs and
damages. In addition it will have to spend a little more to
complete phase II of the project. Thus in the end the project is
likely to cost not $3 billion but more like $5.2 to 5.4 billion.
For much of the year or more that this demeaning dispute has
dragged on, the Centre played ostrich and pretended that this was
simply a dispute between a State Government and a private
company, and it had no say in the matter. That pretext in any
case wore thin when New Delhi refused to honour its counter-
guarantee after the MSEB stopped paying its monthly dues. But
today it has been exposed for the hollow sham it was because
neither the MSEB nor the Maharashtra Government is even capable,
let alone willing, to pay such an enormous penalty. So the bill
will, inevitably land at the Centre's door. And that means the
taxpayer's door.

The Centre will have no option but to pay. But having done so,
will it then gift the project to the Maharashtra government? The
answer, obviously, is no. What it will be forced to do is
transfer it to the National Thermal Power Corporation to complete
and operate. But since no one can possibly run a $5 billion power
plant generating 2,100 MW of power profitably, the NTPC too will
insist on the capital value of the project being substantially
written down first. Judging from the offers that the Tata
Electric Company and the Bombay Suburban Electricity Supply
Company (BSES) were making to Enron, the written down value will
not exceed $2 billion. Thus, whichever way we look at it, the
country will end by paying for a Dabhol-size power plant ($3
billion) without getting a single watt of electricity or for that
matter anything else) in return.

None of the above criticism is intended to deny that Enron
probably did gold plate the Dabhol project once the Narasimha Rao
government agreed to price its power on a cost-plus basis. Nor is
it intended to mitigate the criticism of the Rao government that
had it only brought the Maharashtra government and more
particularly the MSEB into the negotiations from the beginning
the latter's inability under law to pay backup charges at more
than twice the rate being demanded by public sector power plants
would have been exposed long ago.

But the mistakes of the past cannot in any circumstances justify
even greater mistakes in the future. For better or for worse, the
Enron deal was struck, and it was struck not once but twice. As a
serious, responsible government that knows the importance of
honouring one's word in a world where contract is king, the
Vajpayee Government must honour the country's contractual
obligations. This does not in any way preclude its trying to
alter its terms by negotiation to avoid pitfalls that it did not
see, but by definition all future changes must be by mutual
consent.

The changes that Enron will accept and will make Dabhol's power
affordable, are known to all. As the 1995 Renegotiating Committee
and the Godbole Committee recommended, the Government should buy
the $800 million LNG regasification plant and turn it into a
separate company that can supply gas to all the current and
future users on the west coast. In fact, it could go one better
and bring in a foreign strategic partner to invest in and manage
the plant. This is entirely feasible because its installed
capacity is more than twice what Dabhol is likely to need. This
will bring down the capital cost, upon which backup charges and
cost per unit of power will be calculated, to $2.2 billion.

Second, the Central Government should buy 30 per cent of the
equity in Dabhol from the promoters. This was negotiated with the
1995 committee but the MSEB could not raise the funds to do so.
This will bring down the cost that has to be serviced in foreign
exchange to $1.9 billion and the debt portion whose servicing
represents a fixed charge in foreign exchange to $1.2 billion.

The Centre could also follow up a suggestion made by the chairman
of BSES to convert a part of the foreign exchange into rupee
debt. That will reduce further the vulnerability of electricity
tariffs to changes in the exchange rate. With the price of oil
having fallen (for India) to around $20 a barrel, these changes
will bring down the cost of Dabhol's power at 90 per cent
capacity utilisation own to below Rs. 2.40 a unit. This will make
it entirely viable, especially if Maharashtra and the
neighbouring states agree to make a marginal increase in the
average power tariff or are able to bring down power theft and
reduce subsidies to the pseudo-rural sector.

The right course for the centre even at this late stage will be
to take over the project from the MSEB, renegotiate it with
Enron, or if Enron wants to opt out, then buy the project from it
at cost and make the above structural changes on its own before
handing it over to the NTPC. Getting dragged to court will
neither solve the problem of paying for Dabhol's power nor answer
the more basic question - how can any electricity grid add new
power plants to itself without raising the average tariff it
charges for electricity.

Copyrights: 1995 - 2001 The Hindu

Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly
prohibited without the consent of The Hindu


Aaron:
I that master agreement.  I have requested a copy of that agreement from
Denis O'Connell but have not received the copy.  Perhaps you could persuade
Denis to forward the document.

Thanks.  Sara


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2000
04:05 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
03/31/2000 01:43 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: UK PPI Curve Generator with Smoothing

---------------------- Forwarded by Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2000 01:43 PM
---------------------------

Anjam Ahmad
03/28/2000 02:08 PM
To: Martina Angelova/LON/ECT@ECT, Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Surbey/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary Thambiah/LON/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: UK PPI Curve Generator with Smoothing

Hi Martina & Trena,

I think this is a reasonable smoothing method between the short and long-term
models - let me know if you need me to explain it.  I also included the
short-term models so this is now a self-standing spreadsheet, but probably
still needs cleaning up a bit.

ZIMIN & STINSON:

We agreed on short-term and long-term models for DZCV and PLLU PPI indices in
a meeting with Dale and Trena and a simple smoothing is employed to give the
results as follows.  Blue and red curves are the proposed DZCV and PLLU PPI
index forward curves whilst RPI is the market-derived black curve.

Regards,

Anjam
x35383