Let's be sure to keep this in mind as we do future resolutions.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 02:11 PM -----

	Mark E Haedicke
	10/20/2000 10:56 AM

		 To: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb
Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Appointments of Agents and Attorneys in Fact

I would like to do fewer resolutions authorizing non-vps to sign contracts,
and when we need such authorizations, let's make sure the resolutions are
appropriately limited.  My thoughts are as follows:

1.   We have a lot of vps that can sign contracts.
2.   It is generally ok to have confirmations signed by certain carefully
selected directors since we are confirming a trade that already took place
and there is master agreement already signed.
3.   There are certain very routine agreements like pipeline right-of-way
agreements that are ok for carefully selected directors to sign.
4.   Confidentiality agreements should be signed by a vp.
5.   Any authorization for a director to sign should expire within not more
than one year and revoke all prior authorizations.

Please give me your comments.

Mark


Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   December 27, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron Canada Corp.

Counterparty:   Enron Canada Power Corp.

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products.

Confirming Entity:  Enron Canada Corp.

Governing Law:   Alberta

Copies will be distributed.


David Crofts
30 Withers St. 8
Brooklyn, NY 11211
dcrofts@hotmail.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

David Crofts


Sounds like the coast guard found your boat and took your stash.  Sorry to
hear that.
PL
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/05/14/cocaine.seizure.txt/index.html


Still working it.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/04/2000 08:38
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/04/2000 08:38 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Documents sent to GenPower

Here's what went out this evening:

Kay


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,
Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are forced or rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain these outages.
In addition to the two excel documents, there is a dbf file that is formatted like your daily deliveries you receive nightly. This will enable you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.
Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.
 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 012102R.xls
 - 012102.xls


Jim,

Thank you so much for all your help on this matter.  I know how difficult
your job is day to day without items like this popping up.  I spoke with
Carol Randall and Cindy Levi, the principal of the school, and they are so
appreciative it is hard to describe it.  The school constantly talks about
Enron and hundreds of children are using the donated computers and now
printers.

Thanks again and have a good holiday.

Sincerely,
Mike McConnell

From: Jenny Rub@ENRON on 11/21/2000 11:31 AM
To: Jim Fussell/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: FW: Donated Printers

Thanks heaps for all you coordination on this, Jim.   Enjoy your turkey day,
too!    JR

	Jim Fussell/ENRON@enronXgate
	11/20/2000 02:55 PM

		 To: Jenny Rub/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Donated Printers

Jenny,

Just an FYI...

I spoke with Carol Randal this morning the twelve printers will be delivered
to Mittlestat Elementary tomorrow.

Have a nice Thanksgiving
Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Wilson, Reggie
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 1:00 PM
To: Rodriguez, Lupe; Aparicio, Jose
Cc: Arriaga, Alex; Fussell, James
Subject: Donated Printers

We need to schedule the delivery of the donated printers. The address is:

7200 Spring Cypress

Directions: 45N exit 2920, go west to Hooks Airport (Stubner Airline) turn
left. Go to Spring Cypress and turn left. Go to Robbie Road and turn left.
See Dan Burg 281.655.6583. You must be there by 3:30pm.

Please complete this request on Tuesday, 11/21.

Thanks,
Reggie
----- Forwarded by Reggie Wilson/EPSC/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 12:54 PM -----

	Jim Fussell/ENRON@enronXgate 11/20/2000 11:22 AM 	   To: Reggie
Wilson/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Donated Printers

Reggie,

The contact at the warehouse to accept the printers is Dan Burg.  He can be
reached at 281-655-6583

The printers are located at 3AC B1 and when you are ready I have someone get
them for you.

Thanks,
Jim


Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 3/29/00

Regards
Molly


PLEASE VIEW THE ATTACHED SLIDE SHOW


It seems that all they can locate is a PDF.  Perhaps we could recreate the signature pages and simply copy the other pages from this fax I have.


Another deal
Term: June 00- May 03
Vol 5,000
Price  Convert HSC to $3.605 plust the $.769 adder

Janet H Wallis
05/19/2000 02:27 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENTEX Pricing

Okay, finally we have some new pricing.  ( I didn't want Kyle to get bored)

These 3 deals will modify the Residential Contract.
ONE
Term: July 00 - June 03 (3 years)
Vol: 10,000
Price  Convert HSC to $3.355 plus the $.769 adder

TWO
Term: Nov 00- March 01
 Nov 01 - March 02
 Nov 02 - March 03
Vol 5,000
Price Convert HSC to $3.50 plus the $.769

THREE
Term: Nov 02 - March 03
Vol 5,000
Price  Convert HSC to $3.17 plus the $ .769

These are fixed price first through the meter.


did i spell disgusting wrong?  at least i didn't put it in a book for the
world to see.  i have never had any of that stuff.


Please respond to THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE PRICE MANIPULATION OF THE WHOLESALE
ENERGY MARKET WILL MEET ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 18 AT 9:30 A.M. IN ROOM 3191 TO
REVIEW COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENAS FOR DUKE, DYNEGY, RELIANT, AES, NRG AND
WILLIAMS.


Do you want them to trade financial online?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001 11:52 AM -----

	Stephanie Sever
	01/22/2001 11:43 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Procter & Gamble

Yes, their profile has execute to financial products

From: Tana Jones on 01/22/2001 11:28 AM
To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Procter & Gamble

Do we have them open for financial (both Legal and Credit)?


ENA had a good turn out on training this week, over 91% attendance.  Thanks
for encouraging everyone to attend this important training.

Cindy
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Morrow/Corp/Enron on 05/19/2000
05:40 PM ---------------------------

Lorna Ervin
05/19/2000 04:32 PM
To: Andrew Lawrence/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeannie Grimes/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Eric Grest/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Kokas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Jandrell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Petruszka/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Margaret
Wysatta/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian Schnauber/Corp/Enron@Enron, Todd
Peikert/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diane Eckels/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg Lewis/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Morrow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelly Stubbs/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chor-Lim
Goh/Corp/Enron@Enron, Daler B Wade/HOU/EES@EES, Donnis Traylor/HOU/EES@EES,
Bobby Mahendra/HOU/EES@EES, Patrick Cagney/HOU/EES@EES, Jill
Erwin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Franz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Denise Poston/HOU/EES@EES,
Debbie Yates/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Merlyn Fance/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Andrea
Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greek
Rice/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg Nikkel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Howard
Selzer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kent Castleman/SA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Butts/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Chris Morton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Sparger/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia
Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David O'Dell/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ron
Harman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherry
Lessner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Miguel Padron/SA/Enron@Enron, Gerry
Chatham/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Wade
Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES, Biren Kumar/HOU/EES@EES, Ray Bennett/HOU/EES@EES,
Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT,
Brad Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn
McLean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew C Lynch/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cassandra Schultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey E
Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carol
Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Willie
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janie
Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ranendra
Sengupta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary Ellen
Coombe/Houston/Eott@Eott, Richard Amabile/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Ellis/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mike Fink/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: SAP Training Statistics for 5/19 Attendance

Today's Dashboard

Statistics from the 5/19 classes:
Only 3 business units participated in today's training (ENA, CORP, and GPG).

ENA
5/19:   # Projected:  9
 # Attended:  7
 % Attendance:  78%
GPG
5/19:   # Projected:  16
 # Attended: 16
 % Attendance:  100%
CORP
5/19:   # Projected:  8
 # Attended:  4
 % Attendance: 50%

Statistics from the Week of 5/15 - 5/19 classes:

ENA
# Projected: 83
# Attended: 76
% Attendance:  91.6%

GPG
# Projected: 68
# Attended: 64
% Attendance:  94.1%

CORP
# Projected:  8
# Attended:  4
% Attendance: 50%

EES
# Projected: 39
# Attended: 21
% Attendance:  53.8%

Please review the below attachment for more details about this week's
statistics:


Sorry - I think so.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:03 AM
To:	Fagan, Fran
Subject:	RE: Lindy Donoho - Work Schedule

Yes, I'll be working a regular 5x8 schedule.

What voicemail?  Are you thinking of someone else?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fagan, Fran
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:54 AM
To:	Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	RE: Lindy Donoho - Work Schedule

Are you going to be working a regular 5x8 schedule?

Did my voicemail address your question from yesterday?

Thanks,

Fran

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:49 AM
To:	Robertson, Audrey
Cc:	Fagan, Fran; Harris, Steven
Subject:	Lindy Donoho - Work Schedule

Effective March 1, 2002, I will not be working the 9/80 schedule anymore.  Please let me know if you need anything else from me.

Thanks,
Lindy


Cool.  Sending messages in real-time.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson, Linda
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:08 PM
To: 'dwatkiss@bracepatt.com'; 'acomnes@enron.com'; Steffes, James D.;
'rfrank@enron.com'; 'smara@enron.com'; 'snovose@enron.com'
Subject: Re: Ripple Order

Congrats team
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Where do you want to meet in the tunnell?  I am at 2 Houston.


Confidential Settlement Document Under CPUC Rule 51

PARTIES:

This is a reminder that PG&E is hosting the next workshop regarding "Gas
Accord II" issues, at PG&E headquarters, Room 300, 77 Beale Street, San
Francisco, this Wednedsay and Thursday, October 11-12.  We plan to start at
9:30 a.m. and end around 3:30 p.m., on both days.  PG&E will provide lunch
on both days.

Attached is our proposed agenda for this workshop, which will address market
issues and cost-of-service and rate issues related to PG&E's California Gas
Transmission system.  In addition, we are pleased to note that
representatives of the California Energy Commission will make a presentation
regarding their forecast of future electric generation demand.

We also will use some time at this week's workshop to inform the
participants about new issues various parties have identified since the
first workshop on September 14.

PLEASE RSVP IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THIS WEEK'S WORKSHOP, so that we can get
an accurate head-count for the lunches we will order.  Please RSVP to:
Darcy Morrison, e-mail D2Mr@pge.com, or telephone at (415) 973-6644.

We look forward to this week's workshop, which we think you will find very
informative.

Best regards,

Frank Lindh    Ray Williams
Attorney    Director
415-973-2776   415-973-3634
frl3@pge.com   rdw0@pge.com

 <<Agenda 10-11&12-00 Workshop.doc>>

 - Agenda 10-11&12-00 Workshop.doc


Can we expand our meeting tomorrow AM to include this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 07:37 PM
---------------------------
From: James P Studdert/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/17/2001 04:15 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: James L Bouillion/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, James P
Studdert/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: SWPC 501D5A Generator Damager onboard M/V:  INDUSTRIAL BRIDGE

Have just talked with adjuster again, and she has preliminary verbal report
from surveyor who says that drawings merely confirm his prior contention that
this generator was NOT a total loss at the time of the loss, but that further
inspection of the unit would be necessary to prove otherwise.

The comments from Andrew Edison about pressing SWPC on their responsibilities
and ownership of the unit, this has previously been expressed by the adjuster
to Jim Bouillion.  She definitely would like to have a sit down meeting with
Enron people only, not SWPC at this time,  to discuss options and where we go
from here.  She still hasn't signed the CA, but that is not necessary as she
is not looking at the drawings and looking at them by her is not necessary
for the purpose of a meeting with Enron.

I did not check her availability for a meeting at this time because my
schedule for Mon-Tues is still up in the air, and Jim Bouillion has a Mon-Wed
meeting with our captive insurer in Vermont and would not be available before
Thursday.  Do we collectively want to go forward with the sit down meeting
with the adjuster, and if yes, who all needs to be involved and what are
their availabilities?

Concerning the VALUE of the generator, the declared value of the entire
shipment was $24,506,000.  There is no breakdown on the paperwork I have (or
the broker) that puts a separate value on just the generator.  Thus I guess
someone either has that or SWPC can provide that information.  The policy is
not a "replacement cost value"  policy nor an "actual cash value" policy, but
a "valued" policy.  What that means is we get paid what ever we declared the
value to be CIF + 10%.  Hence the need to know what part of the $24,506,000
is the "value" of the generator.

I await further instructions as to how you want to proceed.


Well, it wasn't that bad.  I was delayed a half an hour from Newark and then
was only about a half an hour late getting into Houston.  I made it to bed by
12:15 am and managed to drag myself out of bed at 5 am.  I have a bunch of
work to do this week which SUCKS, but I'm interested and excited about what I
have to do, so it's good.  Fortunately this scheduling thing has become
second nature so I don't really have to think too much this morning.  How are
you?

Mat

kathy.scully@milliman.com on 01/16/2001 08:20:52 AM
To: Matt.Smith@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re:

i was thinking you're flight was probably very delayed b/c of the weather.
what time did you get home and when did you wake up?

MIME:Matt.Smith@enron.com on 01/16/2001 09:18:02 AM
To: Kathy Scully@MRUS
cc:

Subject: Re:

So tired I am.


Brian,

Another interesting problem that may lead to a trip to an exotic place.

As you know, Brazil is in the midst of a very severe power shortage. About
95% of installed capacity in Brazil is hydro (out of about 65 GW) and the level of
water in the reservoirs  is about 20% of the normal. We have a huge
exposure in Brazil given our LDC investments and merchant power plants.

Measuring water level in the reservoirs is a critical project and boys from Brazil
are asking for help. We have looked into a similar problem in Norway and came up with interesting
technical solutions but had to drop it because of lawyers' objections. These
objections may not apply to Brazil.

Can we arrange for a conference call between you and me and Remy Collonge from
Sao Paulo to discuss the problem? He will be  back in his office on Tuesday .

I shall call you tomorrow about it. What is your phone number?

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mihura, Brian
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:56 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Would anyone be interested?....

Please let Martin know.  I found that there is "some" reporting to Western power traders on the status of the inter-tie but I do not know how timely that information is.

Gina had mentioned to me tat you had spent time in Sardinia which is why I found the restaurant.  I have no idea what this place is like but it is rated well by gourmands.

On another note...  should I slip Mr. Lay my resume?  I hear that there is a vacancy.


Tracy,  could you please send me the info for TW Commercial for the 3rd CE and also the TW 2002 plan detail.  Please send me any updates as they occur also.  I'm receiving the detailed info from Steve Gilbert, but he doesn't always have the TW info, so it would be easier if you just sent it directly to me.   Please call if any questions.   thanks   Mary Kay


Dave and Dean, I am forwarding the email to Richard Sanders.  Richard, this is FYI.  The Calif. State Atty Gen'l's office wanted to see the land use application in connection with our project development efforts in Lodi, CA.  We don't understand why that office would be interested.  If you have any concerns, please let me know; also, if we learn more about this, we will let you know.

Christian, this is FYI re your California trading matters, in case this might be relevant.

Kenton

-----Original Message-----
From: Parquet, David
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:32 AM
To: Erwin, Kenton; Russell, Dean; Mcdonald, Michael
Cc: Calvert, Gray; Erwin, Kenton
Subject: RE: Lodi Land Use

Why don't we let richard Sanders know about this.  I agree with Kenton that someone is probably up to no good.  However, if I understand the document, it is (or will) probably be public one day anyway.  I would let Richard know just as an FYI and see what are his comments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Erwin, Kenton
Sent: Tue 11/13/2001 5:52 PM
To: Russell, Dean; Mcdonald, Michael; Parquet, David
Cc: Calvert, Gray; Erwin, Kenton
Subject: RE: Lodi Land Use

Who is Rad?  This is Lodi's application to itself for approval to use the plant site for a generating plant?  If the AG office wants to see it, I have trouble imagining a harmless reason:  I almost wonder if the AG is interested in whether the city would have legal authority to both apply and approve.  But somebody would have had to arouse the state's interest; who would do that?  PG&E?

If the application is a public document, then the state could easily get it anyway, so it's OK to send it, but why wouldn't the state have asked the city for it?

Kenton

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Russell, Dean
Sent:   Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:38 PM
To:     Erwin, Kenton; Mcdonald, Michael; Parquet, David
Cc:     Calvert, Gray
Subject:        Lodi Land Use

Gentlemen-
FYI - Tim Murphy at URS called me today to let me know that Rad Bartlam called him and asked him to send a copy of the Lodi Land Use Application to the State Attorney General's Office.  Rad said he didn't know why they wanted it, and Tim has no clue either.  I told Tim it was OK to send it.  Any guesses as to why they want it?

Dean


Michelle and Andy,  I will send you a copy when I receive it.  Please let me know if anyone else should be notified.  Thank you, Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Schaeffer, Caroline
Sent: Sun 11/18/2001 7:47 PM
To: Hirl, Joseph; Duenner, Anthony; Hicks, Michelle
Cc: Trieschman, Paul; Goh, Chor Lim; McBride, Jane
Subject: Litigation

I have just received a fax sent to Joe, copied to me, from Jim Weisser, stating that he will be filing suit against Enron Japan Corp. for wrongful termination.  A copy of the fax is on its way to Michelle and Anthony.  Joe, I expect you'll be receiving the original in the mail today.


Here is a suggested draft of a response to the deputy AG's letter. We plan
to send it tomorrow afternoon after we receive your comments.

Paul E. Stein, Deputy Attorney General
State of California
Office of the Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA  94102
Dear Mr. Stein:
This responds to your letter of July 13, 2001, which I received on July 16,
regarding your discussions with Mike Kirby and me on behalf of Enron Energy
Services (EES).  This will confirm that you agreed that our discussions with
the Office of the Attorney General on the subject of its subpoenas served
upon EES are without prejudice to, and will not waive, any rights by EES to
object to either this investigation or the subpoenas in any subsequent
action or proceeding.  Your letter of July 13, 2001, notes some, but by no
means all, of EES's objections to the subpoenas.  Without attempting to
catalogue these objections, the following points in your July 13 letter
merit mention:
*	Confidentiality order:  This confirms we will provide you with a
suitable alternative confidentiality order for your review this week.
*	Customer notification:  EES has been, and continues to be in the
process of, providing appropriate notice to all commercial customers
(without regard for any other definition) in California with regard to your
request for their contracts.  We do not agree that our duty, if any, to
resist production under the terms of these contracts has been discharged.
*	Territoriality:  Our objections to your requests for out of state
documents and the testimony by out of state residents arises under
California statutes, common law, and California and the Constitution of the
United States.
*	Document repository:  We do not believe the Attorney General is
entitled to production of any documents other than at a central location.
*	Production:  Without waiving any of our objections to either the
Attorney General's investigation or the subpoena, EES is prepared to produce
documents which reside within California which are unambiguously called for
by the subpoena served on June 27, 2001, on the condition that we reach a
mutually acceptable confidentiality order to govern their production.
Assuming a mutually agreeable protective order, we are ready to begin doing
so on or about July 30.
Thank you for your courtesies in these matters.
Sincerely,
Michael E. Molland

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Molland, Michael E.
> Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 10:19 AM
> To:	'Robert.C.Williams@enron.com'; 'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com';
> 'sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com'; 'mlk@pkns.com'; 'mtuohey@velaw.com'; Fergus,
> Gary S.
> Cc:	'arguedas@caclaw.net'; 'aruby@rubyschofield.com';
> 'meltzerlaw@aol.com'; Smith, Amanda D.; Meringolo, Peter
> Subject:	FW: Status of EES Response to AG Subpoenas
>
> 	Attached is copy of the letter from the Deputy AG, which purports to
> summarize the status of EES's planned response to the AG's subpoenas. As
> these things go it is not grossly inaccurate. I suggest we send a
> clarifying response that makes the following points:
>
> 	. All discussions with the AG, and any interim production of
> documents, are made without prejudice to our rights to stand on any and
> all objections to the subpoena if the AG files an enforcement action.
> 	. We have more objections to their proposed protective order than
> are reflected in their letter. However, we will modify their proposed
> protective order and send them an order acceptable to govern the
> production of certain in-state EES documents in the next few days.
> 	.We are in the process of providing notice to all commercial
> accounts (without regard for any other definition) that their contracts
> have been requested and may be produced to the AG. Whether our duty, if
> any, to resist production under the terms of some of these contacts has
> been discharged is unclear and we don't agree that it has been discharged.
> 	. Without waiving any of our objections to either the investigation
> or the subpoena, we will voluntarily produce documents which reside within
> California which are clearly and unambiguously called for by the subpoena
> , on the condition that we reach an acceptable confidentiality order to
> govern their production. We are ready to begin doing so on or about July
> 30.
>
> 	I suggest we send this letter before the close of business today.
> Please let me know if you think we should modify this position, or add to
> it.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Paul Stein [mailto:Paul.Stein@doj.ca.gov]
> Sent:	Friday, July 13, 2001 7:32 PM
> To:	mmolland@brobeck.com
> Subject:	Status of EES Response to AG Subpoenas
>
>  << File: ees 071301.wpd >>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


http://ftp.fedworld.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1040sd.pdf

go to page D-6 for the capital loss carryover worksheet.

http://ftp.fedworld.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040sd1.pdf


Hi there,

I've made some suggested changes on the CO you sent.  In the interest of time
I'm sending this to David Marshall, since this largely deals with ROL and
insurance, and I couldn't tell if he has read this previously.

Thanks,

Kay


I don't know who AnneMarie is, but we just went ahead and did our
Satisfactory evals.  It is ridiculous to wait so long to communicate
performance feedback.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000
12:01 PM ---------------------------

AnneMarie Allex@ENRON
08/29/2000 03:16 PM
Sent by: AnneMarie Allex@ENRON
To: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron,
James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, bob.m.hall@enron.com
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector
McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Mid-Year PRC

I would like to update you on the progress we have made on Energy Ops
mid-year review process.  All of the "Needs Improvement" evaluations have
been executed except for two which will be executed before the 9/1 deadline.
We still need to review 51 "Satisfactory" evaluations.  Our target date for
this process is September 1st.   Please forward your "Satisfactory"
evaluations  to myself or Hector McLoughlin by September 1st so we can review
them and move forward in the process.  Thank you for your help.

Anne Marie Allex


When is Stan available?  Probably will take no more than 2 hours.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX@ENRON   On Behalf Of Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 10:46 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	Re: Azurix 2002 Plan Review

Yes we do.  We were thinking the week of the 15th.  Can you find us a time?

	Tracy Geaccone/ENRON@enronXgate 10/01/01 10:07 AM 	   To: Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX  cc:   Subject: Azurix 2002 Plan Review

Rod mentioned to me last week that we would only review Wessex on Wednesday.  Do we need to schedule something for the rest of Azurix?

Thanks

Tracy


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 03:48 PM
---------------------------
From: Jennifer Burns/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/23/2001 04:45 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam
Arteaga/ENRON@enronXgate, Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly R Brown/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer
Burns/ENRON@enronXgate, Angie Collins/ENRON@enronXgate, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Gross, Adam" <Adam.Gross@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate,
Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina
Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/ENRON@enronXgate, Hunter S
Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy Weatherly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill
White/NA/Enron@Enron, Judy Zoch/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Trader's Roundtable Meeting

There will be a trader's roundtable meeting tomorrow, April 24th at 4:00PM in
EB3321.  Please let me know if you are unable to attend.

Thank you,
Jennifer
3-9440


Julie,
thanks for the update.  a couple of items.
1.  take out IT compliance and we will make it 1 dot point under PB's area of
technology update
2. metals - call it MG(plc)
3.  take out page 16 (initiatives under consideration)
4.  Change org chart;  Jay - add investments and New Mkt. identification;
take S horn off
5. on agenda page add sub dots for project updates and accomplishments under
technology update
6. Jeff McMahon will add a page on finance as well, give him a call for a
draft.  It will go in the vision section put it toward the back of the vision
section

On further emails, only send me change or new pages.  It takes forever to
download this (EOL) when I replicate.

Thanks,
m


Bob & Leslie,

Sally asked me to set up several meetings for next week.   1st one - subject:  exactly what CommodityLogic is going to mean to us and how it will work for us.  She wants the two of you plus:  Leslie - can you designate your best person for ConfirmLogic & InvoiceLogic and Bob your best person for NomLogic.  Probably 1 &1/2 hours Monday.  Please let me know your availability.

2nd one:  Will probably be Thursday morning - can you check availability for this one also (2 hours).  Participants would be all of the above + Greg Piper, Tom Gros, Carrie Slagle, Project Managers for InvoiceLogic, ConfirmLogic, & BankLogic + Mark Taylor in Legal.  Purpose:  Discussion between Project Managers and end users on CommodityLogic.

I will wait to hear from you Monday morning re: 1st meeting.  I will talk to Greg's assistant re: his availability on Thursday and get back with you on 2nd meeting.

Thanks,
Patti x39106


Mary,
Dean Drozdiak (ECC trader) was wondering about our review of the ISDA comments from Shell Canada Limited.  I told Randy Otto that I would check with you and let he and Dean know the status.

Thanks,
Stephanie


Thanks Harry - yours are the first North American GTC's in!


This is the City's red-line against our draft.
;
I will call to discuss.
;
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Maurodis <attorney03@deerfieldbch.com>@ENRON
Sent: Thu 6/7/2001 10:31 AM
To: 'orshefskyd@gtlaw.com'
Cc: Krimsky, Steven; Jacoby, Ben
Subject: Deerfield Beach Energy Center

attached is revised agreement (staff presently reviewing).

Please acknowledge receipt.

Andy Maurodis

;<<73PB05! (1).DOC>>

;- 73PB05! (1).DOC <<73PB05! (1).DOC>>


The attached imbalances will be discussed tomorrow morning.


Charlie,

We are waiting on TGP to hear how their discussions with management have
played out.  We,ll definitely update you when we get more information.

Let me know if you have any questions in the meantime.

Regards,

John

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Weldon, V Charles
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:54 PM
To: Kiani-Aslani, John; Miles, Andrew
Subject: Stagecoach Pricing

Guys,,

I thought I would just let you know that the latest indicative gas price for
the Stagecoach deal is ~$4.62.  That's down ~$0.20 in the last 9 trading days.

How about an update from yall's end on the status of the negotiations, etc?

Thanks,

Charlie


Attached are the results of the Open Season.


Timesheets are due tomorrow... May 31.  Please send me your exceptions for
May 16-31.

Thanks!

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
12/4/00  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
12/4/00  MANAGEMENT-GAS 2,989,591
12/4/00  MANAGEMENT-PWR 336,966
12/4/00  AGG-MANAGEMENT 3,189,446


Call me. I can't get out.


The only info I had from you is that we owed ProEnergy 11,035 mmbtu.  I asked
you if we had any other outstanding imbalances with Cinergy or its
precursors.  You gave me the Onyx volume, but I had already negotiated the
deal.  Whose imbalance is the 10,644 mmbtu??

Susan Pereira

Leslie Robinson@ENRON
11/10/2000 11:34 AM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ProEnergy/Cinergy imbalance on LRC

Daniel Kieran with Cinergy/Producer's Energy called me because he wanted
clarification on something in the contract.  He thinks were forgetting about
the imbalance due LRP of 10,644.  I thought you said the reason the price was
so low was because that imbalance had been taken into consideration, so in a
sense we are netting the two.  Is this correct?  Also, was the Oryx imbalance
of (770) taken into consideration in the agreement below?

Susan W Pereira@ECT
10/20/2000 03:15 PM
To: Leslie Robinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ProEnergy/Cinergy imbalance on LRC

Cinergy has agreed to settle the imbalance of 11,035 mmbtu owed them at
$1.77/mmbtu.  Please prepare the paperwork showing us paying them $19,531.95
to clear this imbalance.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira

p.s.- you can just address the letter to Daniel Kieran


Gentlemen, as we speak Enron's Credit and Legal teams are conversing on the
best way to approach, either an ISDA or a Long Form Confirm, for "papering"
the requested financial hedge.  Once Enron Credit is "comfortable" with
Bellingham Cold Storage (BCS), Legal will prepare the necessary
documentation, once approved by BCS/John Cameron, I will quote work up some
July executable numbers and attempt to contact the Robert, Doug, John C.
This will require everyone's joint efforts in order to accomplish this in
such a short time line.  BCS and John Cameron should anticipate a call from
either or Enron's Credit and Legal personnel.  Thanks,  John

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Robert McCullough <robert@mresearch.com>
06/30/2000 06:55 AM

To: John Malowney <John.Malowney@enron.com>
cc: Doug Thomas <Doug.Thomas@bellcold.com>, John Cameron
<johncameron@dwt.com>
Subject: Good morning!

We need numbers as soon as possible this morning -- also these must be
serious -- not notional.

I am at 771-5090.  I will be available at 784-3758 all day.  My email
follows me around so you can always get me  on email.


Attached, please find an electronic version of the materials distributed by
Senator Ray Haynes at yesterday's press conference regarding municipal
utility overcharges.


Attached are some random thoughts on distribution pricing including, rate
design, standby rates, exit fees, pricing flexibility.

Roger


---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Williams/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 07:51 AM ---------------------------

"Hill, Andrea" <Andrea.Hill@bhs.co.uk> on 04/10/2001 03:12:06 AM
To:	"'Jason.Williams@enron.com'" <Jason.Williams@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	RE:

Happy Birthday to you,
Happy Birthday to you,
Happy Birthday dear Jason,
Happy Birthday to you.

I hope you had a good time!!

Andrea


Dolores,

I was wondering who my best resource would be to talk to about the changes to
the analyst program and how they affect me.  Specifically, I wanted to get
some more information on the Third-Year Analyst Rotation and its requirements
(as I am currently half-way through my second rotation), as well as the
different tracks available within the program.  If you could direct to the
proper individual(s) I would really appreciate it.

Thanks,
Susan Scott


========================================================
From KHOU-TV's Dr. Neil Frank & Reliant Energy W.A.R.N. :
========================================================
WTNT24 KNHC 271431

TCMAT4

TROPICAL DEPRESSION FOURTEEN FORECAST/ADVISORY NUMBER   1

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MIAMI FL   AL1401

1500Z SAT OCT 27 2001

TROPICAL DEPRESSION CENTER LOCATED NEAR 27.0N  34.9W AT 27/1500Z

POSITION ACCURATE WITHIN  30 NM

PRESENT MOVEMENT TOWARD THE WEST OR 270 DEGREES AT   2 KT

ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE 1010 MB

MAX SUSTAINED WINDS  30 KT WITH GUSTS TO  40 KT.

WINDS AND SEAS VARY GREATLY IN EACH QUADRANT.  RADII IN NAUTICAL

MILES ARE THE LARGEST RADII EXPECTED ANYWHERE IN THAT QUADRANT.

REPEAT...CENTER LOCATED NEAR 27.0N  34.9W AT 27/1500Z

AT 27/1200Z CENTER WAS LOCATED NEAR 27.0N  34.8W

FORECAST VALID 28/0000Z 27.1N  35.2W

MAX WIND  30 KT...GUSTS  40 KT.

FORECAST VALID 28/1200Z 27.2N  36.5W

MAX WIND  35 KT...GUSTS  45 KT.

34 KT... 75NE  25SE  25SW  75NW.

FORECAST VALID 29/0000Z 27.4N  38.6W

MAX WIND  40 KT...GUSTS  50 KT.

34 KT... 75NE  25SE  25SW  75NW.

REQUEST FOR 3 HOURLY SHIP REPORTS WITHIN 300 MILES OF 27.0N  34.9W

EXTENDED OUTLOOK...USE FOR GUIDANCE ONLY...ERRORS MAY BE LARGE

OUTLOOK VALID 29/1200Z 27.7N  40.8W

MAX WIND  45 KT...GUSTS  55 KT.

34 KT... 75NE  75SE  75SW  75NW.

OUTLOOK VALID 30/1200Z 30.0N  44.5W

MAX WIND  50 KT...GUSTS  60 KT.

50 KT... 30NE  30SE  30SW  30NW.

34 KT... 75NE  75SE  75SW  75NW.

NEXT ADVISORY AT 27/2100Z

FORECASTER BEVEN

WWWW
========================================================
This message is brought to you by KHOU-TV 11/Reliant Energy W.A.R.N.
For instant weather on the web or to learn more about our Wide Area Radar
Net (W.A.R.N) visit our website at:  http://www.khou.com
=======================================================

Need to change you weather bulletin settings, going on vacation, or
wish to unsubscribe? Click the link below to do so.

http://khou.weatherwarn.net/wxwarn/index.asp?stn=KHOU

TROUBLE UNSUBSCRIBING OR SUBSCRIBING?
FOLLOW THIS LINK FOR HELP! :
http://khou.com/newwxwarn/troubleshooting.htm

WeatherWarn 2000
========================================================


Meredith,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


Thank you for registering with our Personal Accounts Program. Your temporary
password is "UFVRJCWF".
To change your password or personal profile,
please return to the address below:

https://ordering.ftd.com/cgis/action_handler.cgi?AID=myaccount_enter&website_i
d=FTD-DUS


SK - I forwarded this to the group too.  mm

The Southeast RTO orders are out and have followed through with what we
expected from the discussion at the FERC meeting.

The SPP and Entergy RTO proposals have been rejected because they fail to
satisfy the scope and configuration requirements of Order No. 2000.  The
Commission  notes that the required discussions between SPP and Entergy and
its neighboring RTO/TOs has led to no increase in the original scope and
configuration.  The filings by SPP and Entergy were brief, indicating only a
lack of interest by other RTOs or utilities in joining to enlarge scope; they
failed to specify any details of the talks, what changes could be made or
what could be fixed to accomodate combination with other RTOs.  The order
states that the Commission favors the development of large, regional
transmission organizations reflecting natural markets.  The Commission
indicates that they favor four RTOs - NE, SE, MW and West.  Therefore the
order requires the participants in SPP and Entergy to participate in
settlement discussions as set out in the mediation order.  Note that these
meetings will start next Tuesday, July 17 before a FERC ALJ.

The Southern Company RTO is also found by the FERC to fail the scope
characteristics of Order No. 2000.  The order finds that Southern's approach
to focus on MOUs and seams issues with its neighbors is inadequate.  The
order states, "We reiterate: the Commission's goal is to have a single RTO in
the Southeast, and to have that single RTO operational as soon as possible."
The Commission recognizes that start-up costs in forming a larger RTO may be
more, but that over the longer term, large RTOs will foster market
development, will provide increased reliability and will result in lower
wholesale electricity prices.  The order therefore directs the parties to the
mediation as stated above.

The Grid South participants are also directed to the mediation which is
starting on next Tuesday.  It is a lengthier order with more details on other
aspects of RTOs, including Independent Board requirement, congestion
managment, interconnection procedures, planning process and CBM.  Therefore,
I am attaching a summary of the order.  One of the important findings of the
order is that GridSouth is not sufficiently independent; the Applicant TOs
are making policy decisions that should be made by an independent board.
Therefore, the order requires GridSouth to install an independent board and
file a compliance filing within 90 days.

If anyone wants copies of the orders, let me know.


A copy of Dr. Oren's paper, Efficient Intrazonal Transmission Pricing, is
attached.  In addition, Judge Cooper issued Order No. 7 today.  A copy is
attached for your information.

See you in the Commission Workshop on February 15.

Parviz Adib, Ph. D.
Director of Market Oversight Division
Public Utility Commission of Texas
1701 N. Congress Avenue
P.O. Box 13326
Austin, Texas 78711-3326
Ph. No.: 512-936-7365
Fax No.: 512-936-7361
email: parviz.adib@puc.state.tx.us

 - 23220-7.doc
 - ERCOT-Cong1.doc


Remember, YOU are giving this meeting!


See notations in red below.  George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
10:01 AM ---------------------------
From: Joan Quick on 02/05/2001 07:20 PM
To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: St. Mary's FEB First of the Month Nom, Myette Point Northwest Field
 St. Mary Parish, LA

for feb,

VPP gas: sitara tic #541136 shows 11,136/d, when it should really be 11,480/d.

The other 344/d is on sitara tic #555941; the two tickets together total
11,480/d.  You'll remember that the Bank of America tics were established by
John Griffith's team.

and re the excess gas tics [below], they do not match my first of the month
[FOM] info below.  Did the FOM change?

The nom was in fact changed by Hunt at 2:00 pm on 1/31/2001.  Hunt had
inadvertantly provided you with North Central's nomination for the low volume
meter, 9502, instead of Preston's nomination.  Thus, the 2,997/d on the North
Central page (note the 25% WI on your original documentation - I missed this
clue also) provided to us on 1/25/2001 became 2,012/d on the Preston page
provided to us on 1/31/2001.

The GDA tic s/b 10% of the total excess amount, and this is less than that.
Am I missing something?

The Gas Daily ticket won't necessarily be 10% of the total.  Here's what we
do.  We book the VPP volume on one set of firm tickets (actually 2 sets,
since the VPP has been broken into a Brazos traunch and a Bank of America
traunch) - see 541136, 555941, 553654 & 555681 (the last two tickets are the
internal desk to desk deals).  Then, based on Robert Cook's team's reserve
review, we book as much excess gas on a second set of firm tickets as the
reserve report indicates (the Firm Excess volume) - in this case, for the
month of February, that number is 4,618/d - see 540814 & 594648.  Finally, we
"book" any residue remaining after the VPP volume and the Firm Excess volume
on a set of spot, Gas Daily tickets - see 554222 & 555729.  Originally, when
we mistakenly thought the nomination at meter 9502 was 2,997/d, the
corresponding spot, Gas Daily volume was 17,216/d minus 11,480/d minus
4,618/d or 1,118/d.  When the renomination of meter 9502 (a downward
adjustment of 985/d) took place, the 1,118/d became 133/d.  Thus, the total
booked, 16,231/d matches the 16,231/d nominated.

Excess gas priced at IF: sitara tic #540814
Excess gas priced at GDA: sitara tic #554222

For your information, we deliver herewith a copy of the spreadsheet we will
use to track this deal for February.

thanks George x3-6992

thanks
joan

---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Quick/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 07:00 PM
---------------------------
From: Joan Quick on 01/25/2001 09:47 PM
To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Ballard/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Preston's FEB First of the Month Nom

George,

This is a follow up to the hard copies of the first of the month information
that I put on your chair earlier today.  Below is a summary/break out of the
volumes and pricing.

The VPP nom should be in the name of Brazos, and the excess in Preston's
name.  Do you know has Hunt been informed that the VPP nom will be in Brazos'
name?

It does not matter to me how you break out the VPP vols between the 2
delivery points - whatever is easiest for you.

This spreadsheet is the same as what is above....


I didn't get a response from you regarding my e:mail that I sent last week,
but I have heard through the grapevine that you will be making a trip to
Houston next week.  My plans for being in London next week are firm, so it
looks as if we will miss one another.

My offer stands to help you in any way as you take on your new role, so I
trust that you will take me up on that offer as needed.  I will look forward
to working with you as we develop common standards for operations worldwide,
with effective exception reporting.  This is a key initiative for 2000 and
will involve trading operations in all locations for all commodities.


Jeff,

Is this mail getting to you? Please call 502-212-4908...I may have some
buyers for certain of your Telecom positions. -Jack-

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jack Roth
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 11:03 AM
To:	'Jeff Skilling'
Subject:

Jeff,

We last spoke a month or so ago...just after you returned home from your
trip with your son, yet prior to your annoncement to leave Enron. You were
kind enough to return my call based on our YPO connection.

Since we last spoke, I have started a new company, APB Merchant Services,
within a very successful energy brokering company called APB Energy.

I would like to talk with you, or someone within Enron...perhaps Jeff
Donahue, about assistance in asset disposal. We represent a large base of
cash buyers and have successfully made markets in this Telecom space.

Either way, I would enjoy an opportunitty to catch up with you...please call
502.212.4908.

Regards,

Jack Roth
APB Services
One Corporate Center
9931 Corporate Campus Drive
Suite 2400
Louisville, Kentuckey 40223
jack.roth@APBenergy.com
(502) 212-4908

This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or leagaly priveleged information.  No
confidentiality or privelege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If
you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is
authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity. Unless
otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted. Any reference to the terms of executed
transactions should be treated as preliminary only and subject to our formal
written confirmation.


During the month of June there is flow at meter 6347, but there is no deal.
There is a deal in May (deal 290472), "Could you extend that deal for the
month of June?"


You're invited to search and register:

Tuesday, March 6

Investinme.enron.com is a new tool to help you manage your professional
development.
It brings together the listings of internal programs, as well as access to a
database of
external programs, on-line courses and materials

Double Click  and select launch.

Web site demonstrations
EB 568 on March 5, from 1-5 PM (every hour), and March 6, from 9-5 (every
hour)

Questions?  Please call the EWS Development Center  X 3-0357.


If you would like to participate in the Katy Flatlands ride on Sunday, July 22, please fill out the attached and return to me no later than Thursday, June 28.  I'm located at EB2365c.  Thanks!

Steph :  )


Looks like we might have to modify this name in EnPower after all - The dba
on our master agreement is "Sierra Pacific Industries" with no "Inc." at the
end. I just spoke with Bob Ellery over at Sierra, and he confirmed that,
although the company is a corporation, they never use "Inc." in their
contracts. Thus, our confirm letters would not match up with the master
agreement because of those three pesky letters.

Just let me know if this causes a problem for either of you. In case you'd
like to reference it, the deal number we're attempting to modify is 573679 -
it's a buy from Sierra done by Chris Foster on the 10th of April.

Thanks again for all your help.
Kate
503-464-7486


GEA Rainey is located in OK.  There are no emission trading programs in OK.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:49 PM
To: King, Lucy
Cc: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE: GEA Rainey

probably not.  mike t?
-----Original Message-----
From: King, Lucy
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:14 PM
To: Woods, Trevor
Cc: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: GEA Rainey

Trevor,

GEA Rainey manufactures air cooled heat exchangers at a facility in Oklahoma.  Would they have/use Emission credits?

Company:
GEA Rainey Corporation
Industry:
Air Cooled Heater Exchangers
Enron Owner:
Jerry Thomas
Private/Public:
Private
MWBE:
No

Business Overview
Designs and markets air cooled heat exchangers.  GEA Rainey is a wholly owned subsidiary of GEA AG (the world's largest heat transfer equipment company).  All manufacturing is done within facility.
Business Areas:
Design and fabrication of heat transfer equipment including; forced and induced draft air cooled heat exchangers, hydrocarbon process and steam condensers, engine radiators, turbine lube oil coolers, natural gas and vapor coolers, combustion pre-heaters, and flue gas re-heaters.  After market products and services including; replacement air moving parts, replacement finned tubes, replacement finned tubes bundles, field service thermal performance evaluation, field service noise testing, field service vibration testing/elimination, field service process controls enhancements, and field service process upgrade recommendations.
Customers/Industry Served
Engineering and Construction firms, refineries, chemical and petrochemical plants, power companies and utilities, and other related industries worldwide.

Key Corporate Statistics

Headquarters
5202 West Channel Road
Catoosa, OK 74015-3017
(918) 266-3060
www.gearainey.com <http://www.gearainey.com/>
Locations
Worldwide
Employees
200-250
Executive Leadership

Financials

Revenues/Sales
$25.3MM
Total Assets
N/A
Net Income
N/A
Enron Spend (2001)
$252K

Enron Opportunities:
EES/EFS
250k sq ft manufacturing facility - 19 acres storage
EBS

Freight
Ship worldwide
Metals
Carbon Steel, Alloy Steel, Stainless Steel, Duplex Stainless, Incoloy and other high alloys.
Forest
Corrugated Cardboard for shipping heat exchangers
Plastics/Petrochem

Enron Global Markets
Emissions
Enron Credit
Credit Manager

Lucy King
(713) 345-6435 or 1-800-97-ENRON
Business Analyst - Business & Diversity Development
Enron Global Strategic Sourcing


Hi all,
I have made modifications on the model as requested.  It now handles different
volatility curves as well as 4 different hour blocks.

Alex


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Future State discussion EB4102 Lunch will be provided attendees:  J. White, L. Blair, R. Dietz, S.January, S. Nacey

Date:		1/19/2001
Time:		12:00 PM - 2:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Here are the contents of the damaged floppy disk.  It
looks like there are multiple indices for some of the
projects.  I have included all the files, so we can sort
through to see which are the correct ones to use.  I'm
assuming that these files are not corrupted.  My machine
is too old to be able to open them.  And yet it was
sophisticated enough to recover the files.

I can only attach 5 files to an e-mail, so I'll have to
send them in multiple batches.

 - Brownsville Due Diligence Index.doc
 - Caledonia  Due Diligence Index.doc
 - Gleason Due Diligence Index.doc
 - Lincoln Center Due Diligence Index.doc
 - Lincoln Center Due Diligence Index-10-09-00.doc


I am free at 3:30 on Thursday at my desk.


For this report, please include interco balances as they are included in pma and p&l.

Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Albrecht, Kristin; Reeves, Leslie; Hall, Bob M; Sweeney, Kevin; Hall, D. Todd; Myers, Thomas; Beltri, Angeles; Herrera, Olga; Bruce, Michelle; Jordan, Mike; Horn, Cindy; Oliver, David; Colarusso, Louis M.; Wright, Claire; Leuschen, Sam; Landy, Matthew; Cornfield, Andrew; Pearce, Barry; Latham, Jenny; Connell, Naomi; Allen, Melissa
Cc:	Brackett, Debbie R.; Whiting, Greg; Abel, Chris; Trevino, Susan; Beck, Sally
Subject:	urgent info needed for DIP

By 3pm today, could you please provide me with information to complete the attached schedule regarding AR, AP, and shipped but not billed amounts.  This information is needed to be presented to the DIP committee tomorrow.  The purpose of this schedule is to put together a beginning net asset balance sheet prior to bankruptcy.  Information needed should be as of 11/30/01.

Specifically, I believe the following people are the point people for:

ENA: Leslie Reeves: AR, AP, Shipped but not billed
EGM, EIM: Kevin Sweeney: AR, AP, Shipped but not billed, Angeles Beltri: reconciliation of roles to accounting for prm amts
EEL, gas, power: David Oliver: prm net asset, liabilities, AR, AP, shipped but not billed, P&L
EEL metals NY/US companies: Louis Colarusso, Claire Wright prm net asset, liabilities, AR, AP, shipped but not billed, P&L
EGM ECTRIC: Cindy Horn/Melissa Allen: prm net asset, liabilities, AR, AP, shipped but not billed, P&L
NORDIC ECTRIC: Matthew Landy: prm net asset, liabilities, AR, AP, shipped but not billed, P&L
EIM ECTRIC: Jenny Latham: split out of ECTRIC from receivership, AR, AP, shipped but not billed, P&L

Also, please give me information about any numbers you are not comfortable with as I am compiling a detailed schedule of the exceptions/problems with these numbers.

Please call me with any questions, comments, concerns (713 853 9123).

 << File: 11-30 DPR to use for recoverability with assets.xls >>

Thanks


SIVY ON STOCKS from money.com
June 1, 2001

*****************[ A D V E R T I S E M E N T ]****************
Jump-start a child's College Fund with MONEY's $5000 QUICK CASH
Sweepstakes! It's easy - just click the link below for your
chance to enter to win $5000 Cash! Plus while you're at money.com,
jumpstart your investments with a FREE Trial issue of MONEY!
Click Here: http://www.money.com/scholarship
**************************************************************

In need of a new image

Bristol-Myers is evolving from a consumer-products company to a drug giant.
But investors still haven't caught on.

By Michael Sivy

When you've been plodding along your whole life, it's hard to change your
image -- that's the challenge Bristol-Myers Squibb [BMY] now faces. Most
investors still regard the company as a slow-growth consumer-products
business defined by brand names such as Clairol and Excedrin. But they're
missing something important. Over the past few years, Bristol-Myers has
been repositioning itself as one of the nation's largest pharmaceutical
firms. And when investors catch on, the stock could receive a valuation at
least 30 percent above current levels.

I last recommended Bristol-Myers in September at $53.50 a share. The stock
has always received lower valuations than Pfizer and Merck because it gets
less than three-quarters of its sales from pharmaceuticals. But
Bristol-Myers had been transforming itself, and for a while, it looked as
if it was getting more respect. By January, the share price had risen
nearly 40 percent to top $74. But since then, the shares have given back
almost all their gains. One reason is that the company is posting flat
earnings growth this year. Moreover, several of the company's top-selling
drugs, such as Glucophage for diabetes, are facing competition from
generics, which will force lower prices and eat into market share. Even so,
the long-term outlook for the stock has actually improved.

On May 21, the company announced that it would sell Clairol to Procter &
Gamble for $4.95 billion. That sale will reduce the percentage of
Bristol-Myers' business that comes from consumer products. Even more
important, when the deal closes, Bristol-Myers will have $6 billion in cash
-- four times its total debt outstanding. That cash hoard can be used to
make acquisitions. Pharmaceutical giants are like movie studios -- they're
basically immense distribution systems looking for product. All
Bristol-Myers has to do is revamp its product pipeline with the acquisition
of boutique drug companies or biotech firms, and the stock will suddenly
look a whole lot flashier.

Since it won't be hard for Bristol-Myers to complete its transformation
into a drug powerhouse, without even hurting its balance sheet, you'd think
that investors would be giving the stock more of a premium. At $56.25,
Bristol-Myers trades at 24 times this year's estimated earnings. That's
certainly a fair valuation for a stock with a 12 percent core growth rate
and a 2 percent dividend yield. But if you look not at what Bristol-Myers
has been, but what it so easily could become, you'd think a substantially
higher P/E should be in order.

###

Post your comments on Michael's column at:
http://www.money.com/depts/investing/sivy/index.html

To subscribe or unsubscribe to Sivy on Stocks, go to:
http://www.money.com/email/

-----------------------------------------------------------
CONTACT THE BIGGEST COMPANIES IN THE WORLD!
Over 5,000 contact names in the OFFICIAL FORTUNE Databases.
DOWNLOAD THEM NOW!
http://www.fortune.com/sitelets/datastore/index.html?mn01
-----------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Special Internet Offer!!!

Sign up for a RISK-FREE issue of MONEY MAGAZINE at
http://www.money.com/subscribe2

Or if you prefer call our toll-free number 1-800-544-4594

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

We may, from time to time, contact you with offers for Time Inc.
products and services which we think may be of interest to you.
If you would prefer us not to contact you in this manner, AND
YOU DID NOT INDICATE THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP
for the Sivy on Stocks online newsletter or any other Time Inc.
online newsletters, please let us know by sending us an e-mail
at <no_solicit@money.com>.

Additionally, from time to time we may provide your e-mail
address to carefully chosen companies whose offers we think may
be of interest to you.  If you would prefer us not use your
e-mail address in this manner, AND YOU DID NOT INDICATE
THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP for the Sivy on Stocks online
newsletter or any other Time Inc. online newsletter, please let
us know by e-mailing us at <no_transfer@money.com>.


Michael,

Thanks. I should  be interested in the materials from the meeting.

Vince


We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop.

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond


Question:  why do we need from jan 8 to jan 31 to respond to staff comments?
I think we should squeeze that time dramatically to take a shot at Jan or
early Feb resolution.  If there is slippage, I don't want our earliest target
date to be the end of Feb.

	Sarah Novosel
	12/18/2000 05:27 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: SEC timing

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 12/18/2000 06:27 PM -----

	"JOANNE RUTKOWSKI" <JRUTKOWS@LLGM.COM>
	12/18/2000 11:53 AM

		 To: Bernadette.Hawkins@enron.com, dlarson@enron.com,
Mitchell.Taylor@enron.com, Paul.Kaufman@enron.com
		 cc: lola.weller@enron.com, Lysa.Akin@enron.com, rosario.boling@enron.com,
Sarah.Novosel@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: SEC timing

Enclosed is a memo that's been vetted by Bill Weeden.

Best

Joanne

 - #189265 v1 - enron -jt memo re PGE timing.doc


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Zachary D. Costello
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: ZC
Report Total: $65.40
Amount Due Employee: $65.40

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


The current version of the conference program is attached

Please confirm your participation as speaker (and confirm your presentation
title as listed on the attached conference program) by next Tuesday. The
program is about to be sent to the printers next week

Please cc your reply also to gordon.sick@rogroup.com

Lenos

 - NYMarch2000conferencetimes.doc

Lenos Trigeorgis
Professor of Finance
University of Cyprus
Dept of Business
75 Kallipoleos, PO Box 20537
CY 1678 Nicosia CYPRUS

Tel: +357 2 892261
Fax:        339063


Laurel,

FYI, Sally will only be available on Monday and 1/2 day of Thursday (AM).
She has business travel Tuesday & Wednesday, and vacation 1/2 Thursday and
Friday.

Patti

Laurel Adams
02/22/2001 04:30 PM
To: Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Thomas Myers/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: Manual Wires

All,

Sheila will be on vacation next week, and we'll be looking for someone to
sign any manual wires.  We have further reduced the amount, so it should only
be 1-2/day.    Thank you very much for your help!  Ana Rizvi will most likely
be the person calling for a signature.


Rod,

I mentioned that I have been working on eStrategy.  I thought I would share
with you my contributions.  The Word doc is a template that is partially
filled in with my ideas (in blue).  Slides 6-8 are my attempt to condense my
ideas into a couple of diagrams and e-Strategy statement.  I have worked
primarily with Mike Sullivan on this but several others have played a
reviewer role so far.  Of course, this is very preliminary but I thought you
may find it interesting as you have always enjoyed technology.

Terry


X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Message-ID: <3A9EDF8F.28D12E9F@govadv.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 15:47:27 -0800
From: Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
Organization: Governmental Advocates, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>
Subject: Hertzberg
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ;
boundary="------------AFE320ECD316FD0D0127AB15"

Here is the revised Hertzberg memo.

Speak to you soon.

Scott

 - Hertzberg final.doc


Please provide us with your EZ-tag no. so that we can program it to work in
the new garage, ASAP.


Great news, everyone. For the third consecutive year, Fortune magazine has
named Enron one of the nation's top employers on its annual "100 Best
Companies to Work for in America" list.  This year Enron ranks No. 22, up
from No. 24 last year.

We continue to move up on Fortune's list, which shows that you, our
employees, believe Enron is a cool place to work.  Thanks to all of you who
took time from your busy schedules to share your Enron experiences with
Fortune in its confidential survey.

Your contributions this past year have raised Enron's profile as we've
enjoyed unprecedented achievements.  So give yourself a pat on the back for a
job well done and for contributing to one of corporate America's great
success stories.

We look forward to continuing the momentum in 2001 and wish you and your
family a pleasant holiday season and a Happy New Year.


I'm thinking about a Nissan Pathfinder.  Then I think about just keeping my
money and driving what I have.


Joe Hillings
Enron
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC  20006
202-466-9145
202-828-3372 (fax)
email:  jhillin@enron.com

Steve: We had an outstanding kidk off meeting in Houston and then two
additional meetings of declining participation. We have copied the Enron WTO
Working Group on various e-mails but other than Geneen Migden and of course
Rick Shapiro in his supervisory role have had no input except from Chris and
Steve. Steve has been communicating directly with EBS on the growing
e-commerce and audio visual aspects of the WTO services negotiation launch
which we are anticipating in the spring. We now have concerns in the
financial services area (trading) which  may be emerging. I copied our
Washington group this morning on a confidential ISAC 13 document I received
yesterday which Bob Fisher recommended that we examine closely regarding
financial services.

I think a WTO task force continues to have merit but perhaps should be
staffed by people from EBS, Enron's financial services people, perhaps a Tom
Briggs and chaired by Linda if you see the growing aspects of our work on WTO
services. We also need the help of our trade professional Bob Fisher.


Is this still outstanding?  Craig is back in the office now.

D

Julie Meyers
03/20/2000 02:27 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Mitchell Gas Services 2/00

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000 02:26
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/20/2000 02:08 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William C Falbaum/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mitchell Gas Services 2/00

We have a price difference with Mitchell Gas Services for 2/00 production,
deal 156658.  We have HSC -0.05 and Mitchell shows HSC - 0.04.  Can you tell
me what the correct price is?  I need this ASAP.

Megan


Please see the attached documents for important information regarding
the meetings for 2002.

 <<List of 2002 Board dates.doc>>  <<Exec. Cmte. Dates for 2002.doc>>

Arlene McCarty
Executive Assistant to
  the President and CEO
1200 Smith, Suite 700
Houston, TX 77002
713-844-3602 (phone)
713-844-0202 (fax)
<http://www.houston.org>

 - List of 2002 Board dates.doc
 - Exec. Cmte. Dates for 2002.doc


Whichever one of you has the great good fortune to work on the subject,
please note the following:

All 5 additional events of default should also be Material Adverse Changes
with respect to the ability to hold collateral.

In addition to the financial triggers indicated in my earlier-emailed credit
worksheets (FYI==> ), the following should be added as additional termination
events:

1  The Manager ceases to be either Joseph Kleinman or Simon Glover and an
alternate Manager acceptable to Party A has not assumed the responsibilities
of Manager.

2  In the event there exists one Manager, if the Manager resigns, is
terminated, or is otherwise incapacitated for a period exceeding one month.
In the event there exists more than one Manager, if for a coincident period
of one month, all of the Managers have resigned, been terminated, or have
otherwise been incapacitated.

Add the following definition:
 "Manager" means any person(s) with ultimate authority to direct the
investments of Party B, currently Joseph Kleinman and Simon Glover.

Replace Independent Amount definition with our new hedge fund standard.  It
is extracted from Union Spring as follows (But change the Independent Amount
to be each of the two counterparty's pro rata share of $50,000; The pro rata
distribution should be based on the allocation of the trade volumes):

(A)  &Independent Amount8 means with respect to Party A, the amount specified
as such for Party A in each Confirmation, or if no amount is specified, zero
and means with respect to Party B the amount specified as such for Party B
which may be either increased or decreased from time to time in a
Confirmation, which amount as modified shall be the Independent Amount
applicable for all outstanding Transactions, provided, however, that in no
event shall Party B,s Independent Amount be less than $100,000 if there are
any outstanding Transactions.

Add as an additional termination event and Material Adverse Change for Enron
the following:

(ii) The following will constitute an Additional Termination Event with
respect to Party A:

Party A,s Credit Support Provider,s credit rating is below BBB- by S&P, or if
it has no credit rating from S&P, Party A,s Credit Support Provider,s credit
rating is below Baa3 by Moody,s, or Party A,s Credit Support Provider fails
to have a rating from either S&P or Moody,s.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 09:11
AM ---------------------------

Michael Jacobson@ENRON
12/01/2000 09:03 AM
To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transmission Rate Part II

Sorry about that, here it is for real this time.


Rod:
FYI. Let me know what you think.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 06:21 PM -----

	steven.kessler@db.com
	06/01/2000 06:03 PM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Credit Comments

Hi Carol:

Thanks for the comments.

1.  The materiality language in the cross-default is DB policy, which we
cannot change.

2.   For CEUM, I will need to get treasury and credit approval.

3.   We should be able to work something out for same product netting.

4.  Should be ok.

Regarding the guarantee, we need to discuss the demand section.  With
respect to the defences, let me propose a compromise--namely that the
Guarantor can raise whatever defences it could have raised had we dealt
directly with the Guarantor as Counterparty.  Anything more than that,
would be a subjecting DB to additional  risk.

Regards,

Steve

Original Message from Carol.St.Clair@enron.com @ HUB on 05/30:

Steven :
I have finally had a chance to go over the outstanding credit issues with
Rod
Nelson, our credit person, and here are his responses:

1.   We cannot agree to the additional language in the cross-default
provision.
We need a trigger that is not subject to interpretation and second-guessing
and
the language that you proposed does just that.

2.   On credit event upon merger, we would prefer to define the standard
for
"materially weaker" as below investment grade.  Is that a problem for you?

3.   With respect to payment netting, we would prefer that netting apply to
Transactions that are of the same product line (i.e. all commodity swaps).
Is
that a problem for you?  We thought that your operational issue had to do
more
with netting across product lines.

4.   In the Credit Support Annex, we would prefer that the number of days
to
resolve disputes over exposure and/or value be 2 business days instead of
1.

I am in the process of reviewing the new drafts of ISDA and CSA Schedules
and
will get back to you shortly on remaining comments.

Carol


Tomas,

Thanks.

Vince

Tomas Valnek
04/18/2001 10:41 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Interesting one in the Journal  of Applied Corporate Finance. I wasn't aware
of all events in the mid-eighties.

All the best

Tomas


Any thoughts before I begin?

---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron on 02/08/2001 12:32 PM ---------------------------

Terry West
02/08/2001 09:59 AM
To:	Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Faith Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Thomas Myers/HOU/ECT, Kent Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Jill Erwin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard Selzer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Agatha B Tran/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wade Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES, Carolyn Barrett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Dave Gunther/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Mark E Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	2001 Accounting costs

Please complete the attached schedule of the 2001 plan accounting costs and headcount.  The schedule should include the costs for all accounting, structuring and tax departments, but exclude mid-office support, customer services, etc.   Please e-mail me the completed schedule by the end of the Friday.  We will be presenting this information to Rick Causey on Monday.

Thanks


Anita,

Please, catch me tomorrow to talk about it.

Vince

Anita DuPont@ENRON
04/25/2001 02:48 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Iris's trip to London

Vince:

Iris had asked if it was possible to get a room in London with a kitchenette
so she could make some of her own meals since she is vegetarian .  The
Anetheum has apartments with kitchens but they cost a $100 a day more than
the regular room.   Should I just give her a regular room?    Sorry to bother
you with all of this, but I don't know the appropriate thing to do in this
case.


Go ahead.

From: Elizabeth Linnell on 04/25/2001 04:53 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Government Affairs Meeting

Do you mind if the professionals in my group attend?  5 people (assuming they
all want to go - Margo, Miyung, Linda, Lynnette and Earlene) each at $190 for
airfare, $380 for two hotel nights, plus shuttle services and misc expenses.
I'm always encouraging my group to interact with Rick's group, as Gov't
Affairs is our primary customer base.

I'm not planning to attend the meeting.

Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 04/25/2001 04:50 PM -----

	Ginger Dernehl
	04/25/2001 04:31 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Government Affairs Meeting

Well, the time has arrived for me to let you know what is in store for
everyone at the next Government Affairs department meeting on Thursday, June
14.  The meeting will take place at:

The Omni Interlocken
500 Interlocken Blvd.
Broomfield, Colorado  80021
Phone# 303-438-6600
Fax# 303-464-3252
Check-in time  3:00 p.m.
Check-out time  12:00 p.m. (Noon)

The  Government Affairs meeting will take place on Thursday, June 14 and will
begin at 8:00 am and will conclude by 11:30 am.  I have arranged for box
lunches to be served after the meeting.   After the meeting, we will have the
remainder of the day for some fun activities, along with a buffet dinner
served that evening to complete the day (on-site dinner location TBD).

Block of Rooms - A block of rooms have been reserved for Government Affairs.
I will be turning in a rooming list to the hotel next week so, I  would like
to know by Friday, April 27 your plans to attend the meeting.

Shuttle Service -  See attachment for shuttle times.  Please note, a return
reservation from the hotel to the airport is required.  Please contact the
Concierge to arrange for shuttle service.

Colorado Weather - For the month of June, you can expect the
following:
High's - 80.............Low's - 52

Flights from Houston - I have checked with TAP for roundtrip flights from
Houston - Denver, Denver - Houston and an exceptionally great
(non-refundable) fare of $190.94 is available.  However, fares are not
guaranteed until actually booked.   Let's book early!!!!!

The activities to choose from are as follows:  Please let me know by May 4
your choice of activity!!!!!!

Whitewater Rafting - A bus will leave the Omni Interlocken Resort at 2:00pm
to head for an afternoon of exciting adventure on Colorado's Clear Creek.
The Arkansas River is one of the most popular whitewater adventures anywhere,
combining spectacular scenery and action packed rapids.  Teamwork is the name
of the game as your team paddles down these tumbling cascades.  Continuous
class III and IV rapids will thrill guests throughout the run. Drop over
Nomad, surge through the Phoenix Holes and take on the class IV climax, the
Outer Limits.  Good physical condition and the ability to swim are
recommended.  The group will have three thrilling hours on the river and will
return to the Omni by 6:15pm.

Chautauqua Park Hiking Adventure - One of the most popular access points for
mountain hiking trails in Boulder is Chautauqua Park. The focal point is the
100-year-old dining hall.  The Colorado Chautauqua is one of only four of the
original Chautauquas still operating in America, as opposed to when thousands
dotted the nation and culturally enriched rural people in the early 1900s.
The tour includes: transportation, professional guide service, two hours of
guided hiking - total time for excursion is 4 hours. (Dress code: Shorts or
hiking attire, appropriate footwear, sunglasses, sunscreen and hats).
Departure time and return will be relayed at a later date.

Spa Services -  The Spa at Omni Interlocken Resort offers a number of spa
services (massages, facial & skin care treatments, body treatments or nail
services, to name a few).  If you are interested in this as an activity,
please let me know and I will fax a detailed list of their services.  You
will need to call the spa and schedule your own appointment if this is the
activity you choose.

Golf -  For the golf enthusiasts, an afternoon of golf at the Omni
Interlocken 27-hole championship golf course which stretches out over 300
acres of verdant fairways is another activity to select from.  Spectacular
panoramic views from three 9-hole courses, which feature more than 400 feet
in elevation changes.  If this is the activity of choice please respond via
e:mail and I will add you to the list.  The game of choice will be "best
ball" play.

Biking -  Scenic bike paths are located near the hotel for those with
interest.  If this is your choice of activity, please let me know and I will
reserve a bike and map for you enjoyment.

After reviewing the choices above, please select an activity you prefer to
take part in.  Due to the fact that our group is so large, (which makes it
more difficult to coordinate activities) once you select an activity, we ask
that you not change your selection.  So, please talk to your colleagues ahead
of time before making your choice.

Thanks and don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.

Gngr

 - SuperShuttle.doc
 - Directions from DIA with map.doc


Give me a call when you get the chance to look at this and I'll update you on
the discussion we had yesterday on automating the request for service
process.  Shelley, Tony and myself got comfortable that with a few changes to
the verbiage a customer sees before he clicks on a parcel of capacity, and
with a couple of minor limitations on the capacity we sell (i.e., no Subpart
B-restricted 311 capacity parcels) Northern will be able to treat a
customer's click on a parcel of capacity as submission of a request for
service.
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/16/2000
08:15 AM ---------------------------

08/15/2000 06:42 PM
Tony Pryor
Tony Pryor
Tony Pryor
08/15/2000 06:42 PM
08/15/2000 06:42 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Teb
Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: EOL Transactions

Attached is a revised draft of the text appearing with the long product
description on EOL, as discussed today. The purpose of the additional
paragraph is to eliminate the need for a separate submission of a request for
service. Please give me your feedback/comments.


I am not speaking of capital, only O & M.  I really need a list of all items on the balance sheet for reserves, def. charges etc.  I need to know when they will turn, what they are for and if they are in your 2001 plan.

thanks

John Keiser
01/30/2001 11:50 AM
To:	Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Carryovers into 2001

In the 2001 Capital Budget there are no true carryovers.

However, in reality there are dollars that need to be spent on 2000 projects that will finish in 2001.  These will have to be funded with management approval by other identified 2001 projects that won't happen.


Because they are a governmental entity, in order to do financial our lawyers
would need to talk to them about their authorizing statutes, legislative
authority and possible legal opinions before they can trade financial.  So if
they want to trade financial, get me a name and phone number, probably of one
of their lawyers and we'll have to talk to them.

	Mary Griff Gray
	08/07/2000 09:33 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Western Area Power Admin -- Upper Great Plains

Great -- thanks.  If they want to do financial, would that be possible?

From: Tana Jones on 08/07/2000 09:05 AM
To: Mary Griff Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Western Area Power Admin -- Upper Great Plains

Just an heads up, they are open to trade physical power, which I expect is
what they want to trade, but not financial.

	Mary Griff Gray
	08/07/2000 09:00 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Western Area Power Admin -- Upper Great Plains

Tana,
Thanks for the info -- the customer will be excited to have permanent access.
Griff

From: Tana Jones on 08/07/2000 08:59 AM
To: Mary Griff Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Western Area Power Admin -- Upper Great Plains

Legal has signed off on the counterparty, so I expect it is being held up
with the online team for some reason.

	Mary Griff Gray
	08/07/2000 08:44 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Western Area Power Admin -- Upper Great Plains

Tana/Claudia --

Could you bring me up-to-date on the progress of this app?

Thanks,
Griff
x35753

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     07/31/2000 09:55 AM

To: Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Western Area Power Admin -- Upper Great Plains

Claudia --   I see that this app is still in Legal (since 7/14).  Could you
give me an ETA on it?

Thanks,
Griff
35753


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 09:25 AM -----

	Mark Taylor
	10/25/2000 03:34 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: City Streets

My answers below in red.

	Bob Bowen
	10/19/2000 10:39 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: City Streets

I assume you have heard that EOL is soliciting HoustonStreet.com and
QuickQuote.com in order to
increase their volume and market coverage.  The message below is from Ron
Nolte, our IT person
for the confirmation systems.  I think he is asking some very pertinent
questions that may need your
legal opinion.

I guess my fear is that you have not been included in the conversations and
set-up of EOL's discussions
with HoustonStreet.com and QuickQuote.com.

---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000 10:26 AM
---------------------------

Ron Nolte
10/16/2000 12:37 PM
To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: City Streets

Just came back from a meeting in which Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny and Torrey
Moorer informed everyone about the new venture
between HoustonStreet.Com and Enron and QuickQuote.com and Enron.   In 90
days, HoustonStreet.Com and QuickQuote.com will be offering products offered
on EOL.

I solicit comments from everyone.

As I understand it, a party wishing to trade gas and power can log onto
HoustonStreet.Com and  deals offered on EOL will
magically appear. The party might think, "Hey, I can't do better than this on
EOL, I'll take this deal".  The deal is transacted
and HoustonStreet.Com number is assigned.  As soon as the "Do the Deal"
button is clicked, the transaction is sent to EOL where
it is validated.  An EOL deal number is assigned but as far as the party
doing the deal is concerned, the deal is a HoustonStreet.Com deal.

In the case of a gas deal,  the deal will be bridged to both Sitara and
TAGG.  The deal at this point would have four deal numbers:

  HoustonStreet.Com Deal #
  EOL Deal #
  Sitara Deal #
  TAGG Deal #

Based on the meeting, the following requirements surfaced.  If you are in
TAGG,  you should be able to access the deal using
HoustonStreet.Com  Deal #, or the EOL Deal #, or the TAGG Deal #.

If you are in DCAF II,  you should be able to access the deal using
HoustonStreet.Com Deal #, or the EOL Deal #, or the Sitara Deal #.

This requirement implies that the capture windows in TAGG and Sitara ( I
assume ) will need to be changed to capture both
the HoustonStreet.Com Deal # and EOL Deal #.  The TAGG Deal number itself  is
assigned by the Capture program.

This will require a database change as well as fairly significant ( it was
assumed that there is only one "Originating System")  program modifications
to TAGG Deal Capture, TAGG Deal Clearing,  DCAF II, and Enpower Autoconfirm (
clears Power deals ).

Now for some issues:

1) Who is the internal party on the deal that is to appear on the
confirmation?  Whichever Enron entity  offers that product on EnronOnline
will be the party for these trades as well.  Will a HoustonStreet.Com and
 a QuickQuote internal party be set up in Global Counterparty?

 There are implications for Global Counterparty since all address information
is set up based on who the external party is doing business with.

 In other words, if there are new internal parties, the address information
set up for these same external  parties that do trades on EOL will
 have to be set up again for doing business with the new internal parties.

2) Is the confirm to sport a HoustonStreet.Com logo and a QuickQuote.com
logo? No.  The confirms may reference the platform on which the trade was
done but otherwise it should look just like a regular Enron confirmation.

3) Who is to sign the confirmation letters when signatures are required?
Same process as exists for EnronOnline transactions.

4) Contract numbers will have to be set up just as they are for trading under
EOL.  But who are the contracts between?  If
 new internal parties are set up for HoustonStreet.Com and QuickQuote.com,
then contracts will have to be set up
 between the new internal parties.  But since a HoustonStreet.Com deal goes
through EOL, how will the appropriate
 contract be assigned?; i.e., if Koch does a deal through HoustonStreet.Com,
is  a different contract assigned
 in EOL versus if Koch does the deal through EOL itself? Seems to me it
should be the same - we only have one agreement with Koch.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Video Conferencing - Avistar (Brian Woods)

Date:		4/4/2001
Time:		1:00 PM - 2:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:

Patti Thompson 39106


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000 09:46 AM
---------------------------

Molly Harris
02/22/2000 05:39 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 2/22

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 2/22/00.

Regards
Molly


Jeff,

Once again, thank you very much for your advice on gas.

However, while your advise was sound in principal ("threatening a $3.00 upside
against a $0.50 downside, at the $5.00 level"), next time let me know if your
going to be off as much as 40%( we hit a $5.00 upside instead of $3.00).

Thanks for the help.

Bryan


did we get the 5/d rox at plus .02 yesterday?

mike


PARKS, JR., JOSEPH H,

You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed by Friday, May 25, 2001.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

Employee Name:
SMITH, GEORGE


REMINDER FOR THE TSWG CONFERENCE CALL , WEDNESDAY  @ 1:30PDT

Call In Number (877) 670-4111  Passcode 246870

No agenda specified

Jim Blatchford
Client Relations
Cal ISO
916.608.7051


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2000
03:10 PM ---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
04/17/2000 02:04 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: EWEB

Yes, we're working on the master swap.  Actually, Ed Sacks, our new power
member, is working on EWEB.  Legal should be getting a cws very shortly.

Thanks,
Tracy

Sara Shackleton
04/17/2000 02:02 PM
To: Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EWEB

Have you ever sent a credit worksheet for EWEB?  Holli Krebbs requested this
again in mid-March.  Thanks.  Sara


Janet, Gil and Ed,

Please note Les' latest summary of Elba.  Things seem to be coming to a head
there.  Southern Co. was in town last Thursday to visit us and Les agreed to
start working on a letter of intent with Southern Co for the sale of gas from
the terminal.   We have been asked to work up a good price for gas at Elba by
Les.  I have started working with John Hodge and John Griffith on this.

So. Co.'s latest offer was Hub + $.12 for all 160,000 dt/d.  So. Co. wants
100,000 dt/d at Elba and will give us the option of selling to them the
remaining 60,000 dt/d at Elba or Destin at our option.  We have not discussed
what a price at Destin should be.  So. Co. has some leverage with El Paso
that can be instrumental in helping Les with his negotiations below.
Additionally, they may be the only party that can burn the high btu gas and
significantly improve the btu issue at Elba.

We should be better prepared to talk about this by Wednesday.  Let me know if
you have any questions.

---------------------- Forwarded by Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000
07:28 AM ---------------------------

Les Webber @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

11/18/2000 03:47 PM
To: Doug Arnell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, byamagata@akingump.com,
masseye@arentfox.com
cc: Shelley Corman@ENRON, Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David L Fairley@ECT

Subject: SOUTHERN LNG re ELBA ISLAND LNG TERMINAL

GREETINGS:

On November 17, 2000 Southern LNG advised the FERC that it "has determined to
withdraw the Btu stabilization options from the instant certificate
application", such application being the one seeking to amend the certificate
issued by the FERC in March, 2000 authorizing Southern LNG to reactivate the
LNG terminal at Elba Island.

With this withdrawal, the El Paso organization has drawn its line in the
sand.  We plan to vigorously protest this withdrawal at the FERC within the
15 day period allowed by FERC procedures.  This gives us until December 2,
2000 to file which, presumably, would be extended until Monday, December 4,
2000.

Our filing will be of an adversarial nature, so the Enron organization needs
to be on board with our intended filing, which we will commence drafting on
November 20, 2000.  Drafts will be circulated to the appropriate personnel,
so please advise us re any additions in that regard.

At the same time, this decision by Southern LNG will focus our resolve to
complete the commercial transaction with El Paso Merchant Energy.  We have
come to accept some of the less desirable features of the Letter
Agreement/Term Sheet signed with El Paso Merchant Energy on October 13, 1999,
inasmuch as the more important aspects are very much in our favor, including
several that Southern LNG found rather unsettling.  We will discuss the path
forward with El Paso Merchant Energy on November 21-22, 2000.

While we remain open to a solution to the quality issue that leaves our
commercial flexibility and optionality intact, we must be positioned to move
forward resolutely and in a timely manner with both El Paso Merchant Energy
and Southern LNG.  We cannot afford to stop these processes while we discuss
alternative solutions.

On Wednesday, November 15, 2000, we gave both Mike Varagona and David Jenkins
of El Paso Merchant Energy a "heads-up" regarding our likely response to
Southern LNG's proposed letter agreement dated November 1, 2000.  We
indicated we would be asking Southern LNG to bifurcate the FERC proceeding
into the Vaporizer Project, that could proceed quickly and on an independent
path to certification, and the Stabilization Project, that required
considerably more technical analyses before it could proceed.  When I
contacted Mike Varagona on Friday, November 17, 2000, after we received a
copy of Southern LNG's letter to the FERC, he stated that he had not been
advised by Southern LNG regarding its decision, hence, had not been
positioned to return the favor.

Mr. Varagona will be in Houston on November 21 and 22, and he wants to meet
with us.  He is still pushing for a commercial solution that sees El Paso
"take on the quality risk" in return for our firming up our volumes to El
Paso Merchant Energy at an improved price of Henry Hub plus approx. $0.08 per
MMBtu.  Let there be no doubt that El Paso and Southern LNG will find a
solution to the quality issue at little or no cost.  He said he would like to
prepare us an outline of an offer. to which I responded that he had nothing
to lose by doing so.  The usual practice has been for Enron to do this and
for El Paso to respond with "I don't think that will work".

Mr. Varagona also indicated that he did not see how the Letter Agreement/Term
Sheet could form the basis of the commercial arrangement between our
respective companies - "It just won't work!".  As a consequence, he stated
that Clarke Smith, head of El Paso Merchant Energy, has already contacted or
will shortly contact our Mike McConnell to see if they can work to resolve
this matter. Apparently, these gentlemen have developed a good working
relationship over the years.  He also alluded to the possibility that Mr.
Smith may have also contacted our Stan Horton (for less than obvious reasons
to me).

Mr. Varagona further advised me that a Duke/Williams joint venture had just
acquired the rights to the Gulfstream Pipeline Project from Coastal
(divestment of this asset was required, I understand, as part of the El
Paso/Coastal merger).  "This situation gives added impetus to development of
the Cypress Pipeline project by Enron and El Paso."

There is considerable merit in Enron retaining the right to market its own
gas out of the Elba Island LNG Terminal.  However, we may find it desirable
to reach some commercial resolution with El Paso Merchant Energy for a
portion of our volumes that also makes the quality issue disappear.  However,
should we decide to so compromise, we must either fully engage Southern LNG
in that solution or totally eliminate them from all aspects of our agreement
with El Paso.  In the case of Southern LNG, we are dealing with one or more
individuals who see only one way to do things. namely their way, and who are
totally opposed to working with Enron.  I would recommend any compromise with
El Paso Merchant Energy be conditioned on first reaching agreement with
Southern LNG on explicit terms acceptable to us (and checking it twice).

I would appreciate receiving your comments, if any, before Thanksgiving.

Regards.
Les Webber


david_p_smith@hotmail.com

davidpsmith@worldnet.att.net null & void as of sept13th.

later
smith:)