_________________________________________________________________

                        F O O L W A T C H
                    Friday, November 17, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202601
_________________________________________________________________

                        Close   Change  %Change

            FOOL 50   1,794.12   -1.77  -0.10%
            DJIA     10,629.87  -26.16  -0.25%
            S&P 500   1,367.72   -4.60  -0.30%
            NASDAQ    3,027.19   -4.69  -0.15%
            (Numbers as of 5:00 p.m. ET)

 SPONSORED BY: American Express
 Hey Fools! Take control of your finances with American
 Express-FREE online stock trades, if you qualify. Plus
 exceptional financial planning tools, news and research.
 Apply Now!
      http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=202602

SPECIAL: READY TO GO WIRELESS?
  Our buying guide can help you find the perfect PDA or
  cell phone.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202603

RULE MAKER: MICROSOFT CHALLENGES YAHOO!?
  Microsoft's latest Internet browser poaches on Yahoo's turf.
  Will users still want to Yahoo!?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202604

FOOL ON THE HILL: INVESTING IS A RISKY PROPOSITION
  Bill Mann puts the losses he recently suffered from CMGI in
  perspective.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202605

FREE BOOK OFFER, FOR FOOLS ONLY!
Get a free investing guide and trial subscription to "Investor's
Business Daily" all for free!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=202606

THE WEEK IN REVIEW: THE INTERNET WAS FUN WHILE IT LASTED
  Jerry Thomas sums up a week that includes the death of
  Pets.com.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202607

FOOL RADIO: A POST-ELECTION RADIO SPECIAL
  Reporters from the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post
  join the Fools on the air..
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202608

FOOL FOUR: THE DOW'S TEN-BAGGERS
  Are you searching for Peter Lynch's elusive "ten-bagger," a
  stock which will gain ten times its original value?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202609

TAXES: YEAR-END TAX PLANNING TIPS, PART III
  Don't forget to consider this year's and next year's estimated
  income tax. We'll show you how.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202610

FOOL PLATE SPECIAL: YET ANOTHER LESSON FOR E-TAILERS
  Companies that don't use their brand names to set themselves
  apart will find trouble.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202611

HOT TOPICS: WHAT FOOLS ARE TALKING ABOUT
  Join the discussions on Coca Cola, Intel, and more.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202612

FRIBBLE: THANKS TO A TROUBLEMAKER
  Grandma showed this Fool that women don't have to accept less
  than their fair share of the pie.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202613

BREAKFAST WITH THE FOOL: VA LINUX DOWN, BUT NOT OUT
  Open-source software provider VA Linux reported first-quarter
  results, meeting revised expectations.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202614

_________________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202615
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202616
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202617
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202618
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202619

 SPONSORED BY: American Express
 Hey Fools! Take control of your finances with American
 Express-FREE online stock trades, if you qualify. Plus
 exceptional financial planning tools, news and research.
 Apply Now!
      http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=202620

FREE FOR FOOLS!
 Investor's Business Daily will send you a free copy
 of 24 Essential Lessons for Investment Success when
 you sign up for a free trial subscription of their newspaper.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=202621

17 INDUSTRIES, 17 INVESTING IDEAS
 Find companies likely to thrive in 2001
 in our Industry Focus report.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=202622

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com

 Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
 e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=202623

_________________________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId:
msg-507-2000-11-17_18-56-29-6818907_1_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-19:19:06(11-17-
2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Please fill in the blank:
&First Contingency Transmission Outage8 means

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 10:37 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

I'm still waiting on David Hunt to send me some stuff, which would really
help move the document along.  I'll ask again if i can get it from him. There
are still internal questions in it, which I have annotated. I'm happy for you
to look at it fairly shortly, especially if you can give definitive
commercial direction.

Do you feel that the commercial team is  finished with the exhibits?  I
haven't worked on them, but I suspect the exhibits need work.  I know the
bogey calc doc is a bit rough. [Rorschach, Reagan]  Exhibits are rough.  I
need to make a list of Exhibits called out in the current doc version, pull
them all together, and clean them up.

Do you still owe me the emergency transmission cut stuff? [Rorschach, Reagan]
  Yes.  I am not exactly sure of the context....but try this on for size:
Clarksdale is subject to an Entergy transmission constraint that from time to
time results in a transmission cut and mandates Clarksdale dispatching their
generation assets to serve Clarksdale Native Load.  Dispatching Clarksdale
assets under these circumstances is known as the first contingency must run
condition.  During first contingency must run conditions, EPMI will document
the production costs, megawatts generated, duration of the event, and lost
opportunity cost of buying from the market.  Clarksdale is due reimbursement
from Entergy for extra costs incurred during such events.

Early next week is better than later, and Thursday and Friday are huge
problem days for me.  When are you thinking of meeting with Beck?  Anyway to
combine the two at once, given the short timeframe? [Rorschach, Reagan]  I
think we could get everyone together at the same time as soon as Monday.  I
want them to have the time to study the document so we can get it all done at
once.

Has Dave signed the extension, by the way? [Rorschach, Reagan]   done,
fedex'ing to MDEA.  Will have faxed copy today.

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 09:59 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

Kay,

We are starting to run into some scheduling constraints for next week, at
least with Bob Priest.  I'd like to get together with Bob and Marvin early
next week to discuss the agreement--moving toward finalizing before June 12.
Bob is only available Monday.  Bob and Marvin think it is a good ideal to
then meet with RW Beck.

I'd like to email Marvin and Bob the next version sometime today?

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


There was an incorrect formula in the previous version.  Please review this
version and let me know if you have any updates.

Regards

Shona


Hi Dale,

I thought I'd send this along.  It is the first draft of the "break out"
contract for the ABB transformers which go with the LM's.  I thought Sheila
told me that your stuff is in immediate need to getting this and the LM break
out in shape.  This has not been reviewed with ABB yet (in fact, I haven't
read it yet), but just in case you want to give it a look, I thought I would
pass it along.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/26/2000 10:30
AM ---------------------------

"FAYE STEDMAN" <STEDF@andrews-kurth.com> on 10/25/2000 07:56:01 PM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "PAUL PIPITONE" <PIPIP@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: ABB Transformer Purchase and Sale Agreement

Attached please find a clean copy of the ABB Transformer Purchase and Sale
Agreement as well as a blackline to show changes made from the WESTLB/ABB
Agreement.  Sorry for the delay in getting this to you. We have had to delete
the table of contents from the clean version in order to get this to you in a
timely fashion.  A completed version will be forthcoming sometime tomorrow.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (202) 662-2780.

 - WESTLB-ABBblk.doc
 - WEST-LB-ABBcln.DOC


Good Morning All!

I wanted to confirm that the meeting for Con-Ed was set up yesterday.  The
details of the meeting are as follows:

Date:    Tuesday, June 12, 2001
Location:   EB3801A
Time:    11 am  - 12 noon

Thank you for your patience, and should you need further attention to this
matter, feel free to contact me directly.

Regards,
Keegan Farrell
(713) 345-3317
EB3875


hey- got your voicemail - i'll definitely try to meet up with you when you are in town.  i already have a ton of plans in the next couple of weeks so i'm not sure how many more nights i can stay here late.  what time are you leaving on the 17th?

-----Original Message-----
From: Scotty Morales [mailto:scottymorales@home.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:11 PM
To: Kuykendall, Tori
Subject: Re: Hello

Did you get my voicemail?

----- Original Message -----
From: Kuykendall, Tori <Tori.Kuykendall@enron.com>
To: Scotty Morales <scottymorales@home.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:47 AM
Subject: RE: Hello

hello - i left you a message on your cell phone a month ago - I thought
you decided that you didnt want to talk to me or something.  CALL ME --
713-853-3275.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scotty Morales [mailto:scottymorales@home.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:28 PM
To: Kuykendall, Tori
Subject: Hello

Are you out there?

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Chris/Christian:

FYI.  Here's the version that Kean and I sent to Ken Lay's office for
transmittal to Brulte.  Ken Lay may have chaged it a bit.  I'll find out and
let you know, but wanted you to have what we forwarded to him.  Thanks again
for all the help.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/18/2001 12:04 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 06:54 PM

		 To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Email for Transmittal from Ken Lay to Senator Brulte

Hi Rosalee:
Steve asked that I forward this to you.  I believe that Steve left you a
voicemail describing the nature of the email.

All the best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 06:51 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 06:11 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com, skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 05:57 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	02/15/2001 05:56 PM

		 To: jdasovic@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Jim:
It was a pleasure speaking with you on Wednesday.  Based on our conversation,
this email includes the following:

An Enron contact to discuss developing small-scale generation on Tribal lands.

Our views on the impediments to distributed generation and suggestions on how
to remove those impediments.

A description of the credit issues that continue to impede DWR,s ability to
sign contracts with power suppliers, and options to resolve them. Two
possible options for addressing the credit issue are 1) a California PUC
order clarifying that DWR will recover its power purchase costs through
rates, and 2) an amendment to AB1X designed to accomplish the same goal.  I
have attached talking points regarding the California PUC order and proposed
amendments to AB1X.  We believe that an amendment to AB1X is the preferable
option.

Our assessment of the supply/demand picture in California.

Our suggestions for a legislative package designed to solve both the near-
and long-term electricity crisis in California.  We will deliver to your
office tomorrow detailed legislative language.  In those materials we will
also identify existing bills that we believe can easily accommodate our
proposed language.

I hope that the information is useful.  Please do not hesitate to contact me
if you would like to discuss these materials further, or if there is anything
else that I can do to assist you.

Regards,
Ken

Contact Information to Discuss Interest Expressed by Native American Tribes
in Installing Small-scale Generation on Tribal Lands

David Parquet, Vice-President
Enron North America
101 California Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 415.782.7820
Fax: 415.782.7851

2. Key Barriers to Distributed Generation

Excessive and Unnecessary Utility Stand-by Charges

Solution: The executive orders issued by the Governor on February 14th took a
step in the right direction.  Utility stand-by charges have always been
designed by the utilities to protect their monopoly position, extract
monopoly prices from customers, or both.  But there is no reason to limit the
elimination of these charges to generation facilities that are less than
1MW.  These limits will only lengthen unnecessarily the time it takes for
California to close the significant gap between supply and demand and reduce
the risk of black outs this summer.  We would propose lifting the cap by
offering amendments to SB27X, which is designed to facilitate development of
distributed generation.

Excessive delays and costs related to interconnecting facilities with
investor-owned and municipal utilities

Solution:   The Governor,s executive order regarding interconnection is a
step in the right direction*D-D-26-01 requires utilities to complete
interconnection studies within 7 days.  California should ensure that this
requirement applies to all generation facilities, including distributed
generation.  In addition, the financial conflicts the utilities face when
interconnecting generation facilities are simply too powerful to overcome
through executive orders or other regulations.  To the greatest extent
possible, California should shift control over interconnection away from the
utility and place that control with the California ISO.  This could be
accomplished through amendments to SB 27X.

Permitting and Air Quality Issues
Developers of distributed (i.e., &on-site8) generation that is 50 MWs or
greater must receive certification from the California Energy Commission and
therefore face all of the impediments to development that large-scale
generation faces.

Solution: California should ensure that the executive orders (D-22-01 thru
D-26-01) issued by the Governor to expedite plant siting and maximize plant
output apply equally to smaller scale, &distributed generation8 facilities.
In addition, distributed generation that is less than 50 MWs continues to
face local opposition.  The State should ensure that local, parochial
interests cannot block otherwise beneficial distributed generation projects.
These objectives could be accomplished through amendments to SB27X.

3. Credit Concerns Regarding Authority Granted to DWR in AB1X to Purchase
Electricity on Behalf of the Utilities

Enron responded to the RFP issued by DWR to enter into power contracts with
suppliers.
Enron is in active discussions with DWR to establish contract terms with the
goal of entering into a power purchase agreement as soon as possible.
However, ambiguities contained in AB1X have created significant credit risk
concerns that need to be resolved in order to finalize contract terms.
We understand that the lion,s share of counterparties share Enron,s credit
risk concerns.
Enron has proposed several options for resolving the credit risk issues and
is working with DWR to arrive at a solution that is mutually agreeable to
both sides and that might serve as a template for power purchase agreements
going forward.

Summary of the Source of the Credit Risk Issue

Ambiguous Ratemaking Authority
The language in AB1X is ambiguous as to whether DWR has any authority to
charge California ratepayers for the costs of purchasing power.  From our
analysis of the bill, the language in AB1X appears to leave intact the
California PUC,s exclusive jurisdiction over ratemaking in California.  As
such, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree to include in rates
adequate charges to cover DWR,s costs of power purchases.

Ambiguous Regulatory Authority Regarding Contract &Prudence8
The language in AB1X leaves open the possibility that the California Public
Utilities Commission could determine that power purchases made by DWR are
&imprudent.8  On the basis of such a finding, the CPUC could then refuse to
allow DWR to collect from ratepayers the costs associated with its power
purchases.  Consequently, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree
to include in rates the charges to cover the costs of power contracts that
DWR has entered into with suppliers.

Ambiguous Language Regarding the Ratemaking Mechanism that Will Be Used to
Recover DWR,s Costs of Power Purchases
In addition to the ambiguity regarding ratemaking and regulatory authority
noted above, the language in the bill is equally ambiguous with respect to
the specific ratemaking &mechanics8 that AB1X directs the PUC to employ to
permit DWR to recover its power purchase costs. Based on our analysis, it is
extremely difficult to determine how the PUC would design the rates to ensure
DWR recovers its power purchase costs.  Moreover, as currently drafted, it is
difficult to determine whether AB1X would even permit the PUC to include in
rates all of the charges necessary to fully recover DWR,s power purchase
costs.  Again, this ambiguity raises significant credit risk concerns since
suppliers have little assurance that DWR will have the ability to recover
from ratepayers the costs of purchasing power.

Options to Resolve Concerns Regarding Credit Risk

We have been working diligently with DWR officials to resolve the credit risk
issues.  We have identified three options:

Amend AB1X
The amendments, which are attached to this email, would clarify that a) the
PUC would accept as &prudent and reasonable8 all purchase costs incurred by
DWR, and b) the PUC is obligated to include in rates the charges necessary to
ensure that DWR fully recovers its costs of power purchases.  This is the
preferred option, though we understand that the there may be some political
challenges standing in the way of amending AB1X.  (See attached file
entitled, &AmendAB1X.doc8.)

Clarify the Ambiguities in AB1X through an Order Issued by the PUC, and
through Contract Language
This is the option that we are currently working with DWR officials to
implement.  However, it is more complicated and could take significantly more
time to implement than the "legislative" fix.  We have attached electronic
copies of the talking points related to the order that the California PUC
would need to issue under this option.  (See attached file entitled,
&cpuctalkingpoints.doc.8)

Make Use of Other Instruments Designed to Address Credit Risk
As indicated in our letter responding to DWR,s RFP, we are willing to accept
other forms of credit from DWR.  Those options include a letter of credit,
cash prepayment, or an acceptable form of collateral.  DWR officials have
indicated to us that DWR prefers to pursue the second options. That is, DWR
prefers to clarify the ambiguities in AB1X through a PUC order and through
contract amendments.

4. California,s Supply-demand Picture Heading into Summer 2001

Both the California Energy Commission and Cambridge Energy Research
Associates (CERA), a private sector energy think tank, have issued reports
showing that California faces a severe supply-demand imbalance.  They differ
only on how much and how soon additional supply will be made available.  All
credible sources agree that supply will be very tight throughout the Summer
of 2001 and that unless a solution is found immediately, blackouts are
likely.

CEC and CERA both forecast that California will be short of supply this
summer by approximately 5,000 MW.   These numbers are in line with our
estimates.  California,s supply base currently has a 6% capacity margin, well
below the average 15-20%, which is recommended for reliable system operation
in the West.  Since the West relies more heavily upon hydroelectric power
than other regions, reserves are particularly important, owing to the
unpredictability of the weather and the dry year the West has experienced to
date. In the event of a low rain and snow period, the system must possess the
flexibility to respond to the reduced availability of power supply.
California,s very low reserve margin makes it especially susceptible to this
requirement.

Other reasons for reduced supply for the Summer of 2001 include the early
draw-down of reservoirs in the continual effort to manage California's severe
supply-demand gap; emissions restrictions on existing plants; and a reduced
number of customers who can be curtailed under their contracts with the
utilities.  Cambridge Energy Research Associates asserts that at the current
pace of siting, permitting and construction, adequate supplies will not be
added to correct the market imbalance until 2003 at the earliest.

CERA predicts that California is likely to face approximately 20 hours of
rolling black outs this summer.  The CEC paints a considerably more
optimistic scenario, betting that California will bring an additional 5,000
MWs on line to meet peaking summer demand.  It is our view that California
should view the CEC's "rosy scenario" with considerable skepticism.

5. Suggested Package of Legislative Proposals Designed to Solve California,s
Electricity Crisis

This email offers an overview of our proposed legislative solution.  We will
deliver to your office tomorrow specific legislative language and existing
bills that we believe can accommodate our proposals.

As we have suggested throughout the crisis, any solution to California's
crisis must focus on four issues:

Increase supply
Decrease demand
Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market
Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency

Increase supply--Legislative vehicle: SB28X (Sher)
To site and construct a power plant in Texas takes approximately 2 years.
Enron and others have completed the entire process in other states in less
than a year.  In California, it takes about six years, or longer.

The Governor,s executive orders and Senator Sher,s siting reform legislation
are steps in the right direction.  Our suggested amendments can improve those
efforts by further addressing the difficulties that project developers face
in securing air emission reduction credits to meet the air permit
requirements included in the CEC's certification requirements.  Enron,s
proposal seeks to streamline the process for 1) obtaining credits and 2)
transfering credits between air districts.  In addition, it creates an
innovative emissions reduction bank to allow project sponsors to fund
emissions in advance of obtaining certification, and permits the affected air
districts to use those funds to finance projects that will produce the
required reductions in pollution emissions.

Decrease demand*Legislative Vehicle:   AB31X (Wright)
Because of the delay in getting a solution in place in California, closing
the supply-demand gap through energy conservation and efficiency offers the
best chance of avoiding blackouts this summer.  This can be accomplished most
effectively and quickly in two ways:

Buy-down demand
California is tapping into an enormous amount of money from the General Fund
to finance DWR,s power purchases.  California could likely reduce demand more
economically by running an auction to determine the payments businesses would
be willing to receive to reduce their demand for a sustained period (e.g.,
through the summer months).  DWR could easily run an on-line auction to
determine the price it could pay for these demand reductions.  To
participate, businesses would be required to have the metering equipment
necessary to monitor and verify that they are actually achieving the
reductions.  Enron has developed an on-line auction software package, &Deal
Bench,8 that it would be willing to contribute to the effort.

Use Price Signals to Incent Voluntary Curtailment
To be successful, customers need access to the following key elements:

An internet based hour-ahead price posting system to track the market price
for hour-ahead power in real time.
Real-time metering systems for baseline demand and voluntarily curtailment
verification.
Settlement process that allows for market clearing prices of energy to be
paid for load reduction (&Negawatts8).

The potential benefits of an effective demand response program would include:

&creation8 of additional summer peaking capacity in California, particularly
in the short term, without requiring construction of additional generation
resources.
reduction of  peak or super-peak load on the over-stressed California
electric system, thus potentially reducing the overall cost of electricity in
the state.
fostering of demand elasticity without subjecting customers to the full risk
of hourly market price volatility by passing market price signals to
customers and allowing them to voluntarily shed load and be compensated for
responding.

We estimate that we could generate a summer 2001 on-peak demand response in
excess of 400 MW during certain high cost hours, and a demand response for
summer 2002 on-peak hours that could exceed 1000 MW.  We further estimate
that the market response to this program from all ESPs could be 2 to 3 times
that amount.  We recommend that the State of California provide rebates
directly to customers to fund the installation of advanced metering and
control systems that would support load curtailment implementation.

Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market*Legislative vehicle:
SB27X
The only customers who were protected from price volatility in San Diego were
customers who chose Direct Access and signed fixed price deals with energy
service providers.  Ironically, AB1X takes that important option away from
customers and businesses.  It is critical that AB1X be amended to remove the
prohibition against Direct Access.

Enron's legislative proposal would give customers freedom to enter into a
direct access transaction, while simultaneously addressing the Department of
Water Resources' concerns about stranded power costs that might result from
customer migration.

In addition, California will only achieve a competitive retail market when
the utility is removed completely from the procurement function.  Procurement
is not a utility core competency, as evidenced by the dire financial
condition in which the utilities now find themselves.  California should
therefore begin immediately to phase the utility out of the procurement
function entirely, with the goal of having all customers served by a
non-utility provider within 36 months.  To execute the transition, California
should hold a series of competitive solicitations over the 36-month period in
which competing service providers would bid for the right to serve segments
of utility load.

Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency*Legislative vehicle:
AB18X
Utility bankruptcy will not increase supply and it will not decrease demand.
In short, bankruptcy does nothing to solve California,s supply-demand
imbalance.  In addition, bankruptcy increases the likelihood that consumers
and businesses will bear the significant financial risks of having California
State government assume the role of &electricity buyer8 for an extended
period of time.  Finally, bankruptcy will undermine both investor confidence
in California's energy markets and the private sector's willingness to
participate in that market.

California can return the utilities to financial solvency by implementing a
series of staged rate increases.  California should design those rate
increases with the dual goal of returning the utilities to solvency without
&shocking8 the economy or household budgets For example, California could
amortize the recovery of the utilities, past debt over a 5-10 year period.
In addition, the magnitude of the rate increase can be reduced in two ways:
First, the utilities could absorb some portion of their existing debt in
recognition of the risk they accepted when they agreed to the structure of AB
1890.  Second, California can &net8 the revenues the utilities have received
from selling electricity into the Power Exchange against the debts they have
accrued due to the retail price cap.


Rod,
Caroline forwarded me your questions regarding the Risk System so I wanted to
go ahead and respond since Steve is out this week.

I don't think Philippe requires the level of due diligence that we performed,
but we were getting questioned on buying a 3rd party product vs. using an
Enron Risk System.  We did more research and got the other groups involved so
that they would understand our decision.  I believe everyone is now
comfortable with our purchase decision.

In our analysis of systems, we selected the Caminus product in part because
we had several individual references from Arthur Andersen, Deliotte &Touche
and Ernst & Young.  These organizations, especially Arthur Andersen, have
audited this application and have actually participated in numerous
implementations.  Ernst & Young recently selected Caminus for Equitable
Resources.   Arthur Anderson implemented the application for Conoco and 5 or
6 other companies, and Deloitte Touche recently selected the product for
Tractabel.  After talking with individuals from these accounting firms, we
felt very confident that the product was sound, and we should not have audit
concerns.  Obviously, we have a lot of business procedures that have to be
established, and there is time in the work plan to do that work, but a lot of
those decisions drive how the application is configured so we need to get the
product purchased work through the details of how we implement the new
business procedures since the system does drive a lot of processes.

Regarding costs, we have an approved work order for $650,000 which covers all
the initial hardware, software, implementation costs and first year
maintenance.  This cost does represent a very limited implementation with
only 10 concurrent users, no customization except a few reports, and no
electronic interfaces or data conversion.  The assumption is that initially
the volume would be so low that an automated interface may not be cost
justified, and the data would manually be loaded since it was low volume as
well.  The on-going costs are estimated at approximately $100,000/year.  We
did not perform a separate cost/benefit analysis as this was in the original
cost of the Revenue Management RAROC.  Let me know if you have any other
questions or there are open issues that we need to address prior to
completing the contract.  We are hoping to get this signed and the project
underway next week.  Thanks.


News : EnronOnline Forms Alliances with HoustonStreet and True Quote
Time:  2:30 PM (CST) Jul 12, 2000

HoustonStreet Exchange has branched out into realms of the top energy
e-commerce
platforms today by signing an agreement to post the North American
electricity and
natural gas prices of EnronOnline. The prices will be posted automatically on
HoustonStreet.com and traders will be able to act on the EnronOnline prices
via either
platform. The addition of EnronOnline pricing will correspond with the launch
of
HoustonStreet's natural gas platform in September, the companies said.

Enron also signed an agreement today to post its gas and power prices
simultaneously
on True Quote.com. EnronOnline has conducted commodity transactions worth
more
than $90 billion in 2000. It posts two-way prices for more than 800 products
in global
energy and commodities markets.


Dear Jennifer:
Customer ID#: 4421625
Label Code: EN01
As a past registrant of National Manufacturing Week, you recently received a postcard in the mail. As a reminder, we want to welcome you to Club NMW -- a community of professionals who understands the importance of coming face to face with the latest innovations in manufacturing.
Registering for the 2002 Show is easier than ever as a Club NMW member.
Click on the following link and enter your Customer ID # above to access your personal registration form. www.clubnmw.com
Do so, and you'll have the opportunity to receive e-mails with chances to win $1,000 and other great prizes each month.
Register now and save the $50 on-site entrance fee. Click www.clubnmw.com .

Sign Up Early for the Best Hotels and Travel Discounts
Registering now means getting the choicest hotel rooms ? lowest rental car and airline fares ? and prime seating at the city's finest restaurants. Visit our Web site, manufacturingweek.com, and click on the tab marked "Travel" for complete information.
Now's the Time to Rally for Manufacturing
We've all been urged to get "back to business." There's no better way to bolster the industry than to join your colleagues at the nation's #1 event for the entire manufacturing community!
Examine products for yourself, question the creators and compare performance.
Discuss business trends and challenges with your peers.
Visit an all-new Career Fair offering unique opportunities to take your career to the next level.

We look forward to welcoming you and your Club NMW colleagues to manufacturing's meeting place? National Manufacturing Week, March 18-21, 2002, McCormick Place, Chicago, IL. Click on www.clubnmw.com to register now!
If you no longer wish to receive email communication from National Manufacturing Week, REC-US or other companies in your industry, please click here http://www.recusprivacy.com and take a moment to provide the information requested.


The report named: West Power Desk Daily Price Report <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=25&report_name=West+Power+Desk+Daily+Price+Report&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/18/2001>, published as of 10/18/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Richard:

Because you are a registered CLEonline.com user, we would like to provide
you with the following update about our online CLE seminars for
December, as well as other notes of interest:

   *  December Seminar Listing

   *  New this month:  --> Legal Writing: Meet the New Citation Manual

                       --> Selected Issues in Ethics for California
                           Lawyers

   *  Are You a Member of a Bar Association or Section?...

*********************************************************************

The following is a complete listing of all of our online CLE seminars
that will be taking place on our Web site (www.CLEonline.com) during the
month of December.  We would ask that you please share this list with
your colleagues and associates who may be interested in one or more of
our online CLE seminars for this month.

1.  Anticipating Will Contests and How to Avoid Them  [3.0]
2.  Avoiding Malpractice Claims: Things to Do (and NOT Do) on the First
      Day You Represent a Client [1.0 ETHICS]
3.  Confidentiality and Privileges in Electronic Communications [3.0
      ETHICS (Audio included)]
4.  Consumer Bankruptcy Law: Nuts & Bolts for the Non-Specialist  [1.0]
5.  Dissecting the Web / E-Commerce Environment and Analyzing the Legal
      Issues  [1.0]
6.  Effective Negotiation and Mediation Advocacy  [3.0]
7.  Elimination of Bias in the Legal Profession [1.0 ETHICS]
8.  Estate Planning for Clients With Special Circumstances -- Lottery
      Players/Winners and Pet Owners  [1.0]
9.  Ethical Considerations in Estate Planning for Spouses [1.0 ETHICS]
10. Ethical Issues Arising From Using Experts in Litigation [1.0 ETHICS]
11. Ethical Risks and Responsibilities of Attorneys and Firms Prosecuting
      Patents for Different Clients in Related Technologies [1.0 ETHICS]
12. Family Law Update: What You Don't Know CAN Hurt You [1.0 (Video
      included)]
13. How to Collect Child Support in Texas  [3.0]
14. ICANN / WIPO Domain Name Disputes: Procedures And Analysis  [1.0]
15. IP Litigation Issues: Trade Secrets, Patents, Copyrights and
      Trademarks  [3.0]
16. Improve Your Legal Writing: Agreements  [1.0]
17. Improve Your Legal Writing: Motions  [1.0]
18. Improve Your Legal Writing: Ten Plain-Language Tips  [1.0]
19. Legal Ethics for Corporate and In-house Counsel [3.0 ETHICS (Audio
      included)]
20. Legal Writing: Meet the New Citation Manual  [1.0]
21. Legal Writing: Ten Tips for Better Letters  [1.0]
22. Living Trusts . Making a Wise Decision  [1.0]
23. Malpractice Avoidance for Probate Lawyers: Common Non-Tax Estate
      Planning Errors [1.0 ETHICS]
24. More Selected Ethical Issues Facing Texas Litigators [1.0 ETHICS]
25. New Texas Legislation '99: Real Estate, Lending, and Other Commercial
      Matters  [3.0]
26. Nobody's Bulletproof: Legal Ethics and Legal Malpractice Issues [3.0
      ETHICS (Audio included)]
27. Offshore Trusts: Uses for Asset Protection Purposes  [3.0]
28. Privacy Issues in the Workplace: Internet Porn, E-mail, Chat Rooms
      and more  [2.0]
29. Professionalism in Corporate Litigation: From Discovery Through
      Appeal [3.0 ETHICS]
30. Punitive Damages: Preparing Plaintiff's and Defendant's Case for the
      Punitive Damage Phase  [3.0]
31. Selected Ethical Issues in Intellectual Property Licensing [1.0
      ETHICS]
32. Selected Issues in Ethics for California Lawyers  [2.0 ETHICS]
33. Selected Issues in Ethics for Texas Lawyers [3.0 ETHICS]
34. Substance Abuse and Depression: An Overview for Lawyers [1.0 ETHICS]
35. Summary of Texas Legal Malpractice Law [1.0 ETHICS (Video included)]
36. Texas Law of Eminent Domain  [3.0]
37. Texas Real Estate Law - Recent Case Update  [3.0]
38. The ABC's of Appellate Practice for California Litigators  [1.0]
39. The New World of Electronic Commerce: Business to Business (B2B) [1.0
      (Audio included)]
40. The Organizational Client: Attorney-Client Privilege and the
      No-Contact Rule [3.0 ETHICS]
41. Weblaw: Legal Issues Involved with the Design and Hosting of Websites
      on the Internet  [3.0]
42. Wills, Estates, and Trusts: Case Law Developments in Texas - 1999
      [3.0]
43. Wills, Estates, and Trusts: Case Law Developments in Texas - 2000
      [2.0]

For more details on any of these seminars, please drop by our site:

                       http://www.CLEonline.com

You can easily register online for any of these seminars at any time of
day or night using our secure online registration system.  All of these
seminars are available through the last day of this month.

*********************************************************************

NEW SEMINARS FOR THIS MONTH...

The following are brief descriptions of our new seminars for this month.
Full details on each are available on our Web site:

--> Legal Writing: Meet the New Citation Manual

We are pleased to introduce a new seminar this month from Professor Wayne
Schiess of the University of Texas School of Law on a cutting edge issue
facing lawyers in citations in legal writings.  This seminar is designed
to review criticisms of the most widely used citation manual-- The
Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation -- and to introduce attorneys to
the latest and most viable alternative to the Bluebook-- the ALWD
Citation Manual.  This seminar is accredited for 1.0 hour of CLE.

--> Selected Issues in Ethics for California Lawyers [2.0 ETHICS]

We are also pleased to present a new ethics seminar from another one of
our most popular authors and instructors on our site.  David Hricik has
produced a special online legal ethics seminar designed specifically for
California lawyers that will explore a variety of new ethical issues and
challenges facing California practitioners.  This seminar is accredited
for 2.0 credit hours, all in the area of legal ethics.
*********************************************************************

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF A BAR ASSOCIATION OR SECTION?...

If you are a member of a Bar association or Section that
produces traditional CLE seminars for its members, we would be greatly
interested in talking to you and your association/section about bringing
your CLE seminars online via the CLEonline.com Web site.

CLEonline.com can work with your association or section to bring your
seminars online through a collaborative agreement in which the fees
generated by such seminars are shared directly with your organization.
This allows your association or section to immediately get their CLE
seminars online and begin receiving additional revenue from existing
seminars... and without incurring ANY additional costs!

If your Bar association or section would be interested in such an
arrangement, please forward this information to them and ask them to
give us a call (1-800-522-7566) so we can provide them with more details.

*********************************************************************

Thanks again for your continued interest in and support of CLEonline.com.
We greatly value you as a registered user of our service, and we would
very much appreciate it if you could please spread the word about our
award-winning CLE site to other attorneys in your firm, company or local
area.

Best wishes to you and yours for a happy holiday season and a successful
New Year!

Best Regards,

Mike De La Rosa, Esq.

_______

Michael De La Rosa, CEO          ------------------------------------
  Voice: (512) 310-9618
  FAX:   (512) 310-1720                     CLEonline.com
  P.O. Box 1897
  Round Rock, TX 78680-1897       ...delivering CLE to YOUR desktop!
mdelarosa@CLEonline.com
http://www.CLEonline.com         ------------------------------------


GEA Rainey is located in OK.  There are no emission trading programs in OK.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Trevor
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:49 PM
To: King, Lucy
Cc: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: RE: GEA Rainey

probably not.  mike t?
-----Original Message-----
From: King, Lucy
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:14 PM
To: Woods, Trevor
Cc: Taylor, Michael E
Subject: GEA Rainey

Trevor,

GEA Rainey manufactures air cooled heat exchangers at a facility in Oklahoma.  Would they have/use Emission credits?

Company:
GEA Rainey Corporation
Industry:
Air Cooled Heater Exchangers
Enron Owner:
Jerry Thomas
Private/Public:
Private
MWBE:
No

Business Overview
Designs and markets air cooled heat exchangers.  GEA Rainey is a wholly owned subsidiary of GEA AG (the world's largest heat transfer equipment company).  All manufacturing is done within facility.
Business Areas:
Design and fabrication of heat transfer equipment including; forced and induced draft air cooled heat exchangers, hydrocarbon process and steam condensers, engine radiators, turbine lube oil coolers, natural gas and vapor coolers, combustion pre-heaters, and flue gas re-heaters.  After market products and services including; replacement air moving parts, replacement finned tubes, replacement finned tubes bundles, field service thermal performance evaluation, field service noise testing, field service vibration testing/elimination, field service process controls enhancements, and field service process upgrade recommendations.
Customers/Industry Served
Engineering and Construction firms, refineries, chemical and petrochemical plants, power companies and utilities, and other related industries worldwide.

Key Corporate Statistics

Headquarters
5202 West Channel Road
Catoosa, OK 74015-3017
(918) 266-3060
www.gearainey.com <http://www.gearainey.com/>
Locations
Worldwide
Employees
200-250
Executive Leadership

Financials

Revenues/Sales
$25.3MM
Total Assets
N/A
Net Income
N/A
Enron Spend (2001)
$252K

Enron Opportunities:
EES/EFS
250k sq ft manufacturing facility - 19 acres storage
EBS

Freight
Ship worldwide
Metals
Carbon Steel, Alloy Steel, Stainless Steel, Duplex Stainless, Incoloy and other high alloys.
Forest
Corrugated Cardboard for shipping heat exchangers
Plastics/Petrochem

Enron Global Markets
Emissions
Enron Credit
Credit Manager

Lucy King
(713) 345-6435 or 1-800-97-ENRON
Business Analyst - Business & Diversity Development
Enron Global Strategic Sourcing


-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly Trout <kelly_trout@scotia-mcleod.com>
To: Lauchlan Currie <LCurrie@arcfinancial.com>; Elizabeth Stock
<lizstock@customized.ab.ca>; Michael Leahy <michael_leahy@scotia-mcleod.com>
Date: Friday, January 21, 2000 10:42 AM
Subject: OGC - Charity #

>FYI...
>
>I am getting a few requests for charity #'s  etc...
>
>I do have the charity # (this will same Jim some phone calls), but you
>can just have people forward any forms to me that need completed with
>this # - I would be more than happy to fill them out and return them to
>the companies directly.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Kelly
>
>
>
>
>


did you take his v-card?  i don't think i ever dated one.  i like my women fast.


The European model, one of the "major four" models the market analyzes is in
and it shows generally mild conditions for much of the eastern interconnect
through the end of next week.
In fact, through at least 10 days, and probably beyond, this particular
model shows no sign of any major intrusions of cold air into the eastern
interconnect.

For the tropical feature in the Carribean, it brings the storm up along the
West Coast of Florida, just east of all the production areas this weekend
and stalls it out over the Southeast early next week meaning some rain
there.

We'll need to re-evaluate all of the models in the morning for the long
term, but at least for this evening this is a bearish weather picture
through next week from the European model.

See you all in the morning.

Dave


My preference is to send out the notice as a Staff Meeting w/ Halloween Snacks.  I'd rather it be just us for this meeting.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Donna
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:25 AM
To:	Corman, Shelley
Subject:	39C1 Get Together

Shelley,
39C1 is available from 3:00 - 4:00 pm on Tuesday, Oct. 30.  Would you like to have a social get together for your groups?  I was thinking of maybe a Halloween cake and ice cream social.  Maybe even invite marketing.  What are your thoughts?
Donna


Attached please find the execution copy of the Fountain Valley/ABB
Facility Agreement (the second document below), which includes the
changes to Exhibits A and S, as well as a blackline showing changes made
to the version circulated yesterday.  The date of execution is still
open.
 <<CRO- Fountain Valley/ABB Facility Agreement  Versions 4 to 5.DOC>>
<<Fountain Valley/ABB Facility Agreement - Version 5.DOC>>
 - ABB Facility Agreement  Versions 4 to 5.DOC
 - ABB Facility Agreement - Version 5.DOC


I look forward to the details.....


The attached file shows the Manual Log Data (in red) that is overdue and
required to complete Owner Reports.  The SCADA data is still under review.
It will be added to this report when the data is avialable .  Only two of the
1.5 sites have substantial Manual Log data.


Hi there,

No news here for me, but I thought you might enjoy looking at the second
chart.  Hope you have PowerPoint so you can open this!

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/04/2000 10:56
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Mark Frevert and Mark Haedicke                           12/04/2000
10:36 AM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Wholesale Services Employees
cc:

Subject: Enron Wholesale Services Legal Department

 As a follow-up to the recent Enron Corp. memorandum forming Enron Wholesale
Services (EWS), effective today, we have reorganized the Wholesale Services
Legal Department.

 The goals in reorganizing the department are as follows:  (i) align the
legal department as closely as possible with the business units, (ii) speed
the flow of legal technology across the business units, and (iii) achieve
greater efficiency and consistency across the organization.

 To this end, a legal policy group will be formed for EWS Legal, which will
include Lance Schuler, Enron Americas; Mark Evans, Enron Europe; Mark Taylor,
Enron Net Works; Alan Aronowitz, Enron Global Markets; Julia Murray, Enron
Industrial Markets; and Bruce Lundstrom, Enron Global Assets.

 The organization chart for the EWS Legal Department is attached.  More
comprehensive organization charts will follow for each group.

Mark Frevert and Mark Haedicke


Suzanne:
could you please print out the following:
Closing Chceklist
Swap confirmation
Put Option Agreement
Swap Termination Agreement
LLC Agreement - Danno II, LLC
LLC Agreement - Maui II

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2000 12:51 PM -----

	"Jeremy Bryant" <BRYAJ@andrews-kurth.com>
	06/02/2000 06:26 PM

		 To: <alan.quaintance@enron.com>, <brenda.l.funk@enron.com>,
<Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>, <charles.delacey@enron.com>,
<Clement.abrams@enron.com>, <DAVID.dye@enron.com>,
<DEBORAH.culver@enron.com>, <gareth.bahlmann@enron.com>,
<ryan.siurek@enron.com>, <tina.livingston@enron.com>,
<Trevor.Randolph@enron.com>, <trushar.patel@enron.com>,
<mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com>, <tellwood@mayerbrown.com>,
<eawilburn@prickett.com>, <Tamullen@prickett.com>, <kenton@rlf.com>,
<mercedes.arango@us.cibc.com>, <schottla@us.cibc.com>,
<wolfmark@us.cibc.com>, <aroberts@wilmingtontrust.com>
		 cc: "David Barbour" <BARBD@andrews-kurth.com>, "CHRIS KRECEK"
<KRECC@andrews-kurth.com>, "MURIEL McFARLING" <MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com>, "TOM
POPPLEWELL" <POPPT@andrews-kurth.com>, "PAT SARGENT" <SARGP@andrews-kurth.com>
		 Subject: Hawaii - Danno B Closing Documents

Attached in Word Perfect format are each of the following documents, marked
against the previous version circulated:

-  Closing Checklist (241028);
-  Series Certificate issued to CIBC Inc. (240786);
-  Series Supplement (240795);
-  Drawdown Request (240796);
-  Swap Confirmation (240821);
-  Put Option Agreement (240822);
-  Assignment of Right to Exercise Put Option (240960);
-  Notice of Assignment of Put Option (240961);
-  B Interest Assignment Agreement (240996);
-  Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement
of Danno II, L.L.C. (240998);
-  Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Maui II
(241004);
-  Receipt of Transferor (241010);
-  Receipt of Trust (241012);
-  Independent Auctioneer Letter Agreement (241013);
-  Sale and Auction Agreement (241014);
-  Consent and Amendment Number One to the ESSO 1 LLC Agreement (243465);
-  Notice of Prepayment (242286);
-  Receipt of CIBC and CIBC Inc. (241193);
-  Direction Letter to Owner Trustee (241207);
-  Dissolution Agreement (241211);
-  Certificate of Cancellation of LLC Interest Holdings 1 Owner Trust
(242274);
-  Swap Termination Agreement (241218); and
-  Termination of Independent Auctioneer Letter Agreement (241220).

The changes in these documents reflect (i) a change in the closing date to
June 8, (ii) deletion of the demand note, and (iii) incorporation of comments
received to date.  Please let me know as soon as possible if you have any
additional comments as the closing is scheduled for next Thursday, June 8.

The Asset Notice, Asset Summary and Drawdown Request will be delivered on
Monday, June 5.

 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 243465 VER 1.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 240786 VER 4.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 240795 VER 4.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 240796 VER 4.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 240821 VER 4.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 240822 VER 4.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 240960 VER 3.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 240961 VER 3.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 240996 VER 3.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 240998 VER 4.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 241004 VER 4.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 241010 VER 4.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 241012 VER 4.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 241013 VER 3.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 241014 VER 4.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 241193 VER 2.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 241207 VER 2.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 241211 VER 2.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 241218 VER 2.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 241220 VER 2.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 242274 VER 1.WPD
 - RESULT OF COMPARISON 242286 VER 1.WPD
 - 241028_2.WPD


I have prettied the rehearing of the rehearing up a little bit (California gas reporting requirements) and would like to file them tomorrow, if you could all get back to me or Becky. thanks.  Becky, can you put in the citation to the OMB notice? thanks.


Following is PNGC's Response to Data Request DS-PN:002.

R. Erick Johnson PC
888 SW Fifth Ave, Suite 870
Portland, OR ?97204
Tel: 503.295.2944
E-mail: ?Erick_Johnson@PNGC.com

	Paul Murphy <bferranti@mbllp.com>

	03/08/2001 09:32 AM
	Please respond to bferranti
		? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? To: ? ? ? ?abuckley@wutc.wa.gov, alan@epud.org,
ali.rodol@ci.seattle.wa.us, archive-power-ratecase@bpa.gov,
aw_turner@pgn.com, BASSL@sce.com, bessex@cowlitzpud.org, bferranti@mbllp.com,
bpadiscovery@merkellaw.com, ccopatrny@e-z.net, clatspud@clatskanie.com,
crow@millernash.com, cub@teleport.com, cwagers@dcpud.org, dan.meek@usa.net,
darcy@tonkon.com, darkills@popud.com, dbkinnard@pplmt.com, dfaulk@puget.com,
discoveryparalegal@bpa.gov, dldorrell@stoel.com, dmacgregor@morganlewis.com,
doney@doneylaw.com, doug_brawley@pngc.com, dparrish@prmllp.com,
dws@keywaycorp.com, eauverde@hotmail.com, eboyd@ppcpdx.org,
efinklea@energyadvocates.com, elisaCKF@aol.com, EnerGlaw@aol.com,
Eric.Larson@oremetwahchang.com, erick_johnson@pngc.com,
ghuhta@cowlitzpud.org, huse@eesconsulting.com, ias@dvclaw.com,
jack.speer@alcoa.com, jacksonc@ida.net, janet.prewitt@state.or.us,
jdeason@chbh.com, jeffn@subutil.com, jhart! so@enron.com, JLH@mc-power.com,
johk@critfc.org, john.yanov@eweb.eugene.or.us, johncameron@dwt.com,
jolynnr@mresearch.com, jpw@duncanallen.com, jrb_ora@televar.com,
jsaven@pacifier.com, jschlect@avistacorp.com, kevin.clark@ci.seattle.wa.us,
kknitte@gcpud.org, kmoxness@cencoast.com, kpom@mail.pacifier.com,
kyle@ppcpdx.org, lawyer@teleport.com, Lhamilton@avistaenergy.com,
lpeters@pacifier.com, lwolv@worldaccessnet.com, lyn_williams@pgn.com,
marc.hellman@state.or.us, marss@perkinscoie.com, matts1@atg.wa.gov,
mershanlaw@aol.com, mhain@ect.enron.com, michaelearly@earthlink.net,
mike.macdougall@powerex.com, mmetzler@ci.tacoma.wa.us,
mschaff@worldnet.att.net, mthomas@mtpower.com, Paul@KinergyLLC.com,
pete.forsyth@kaiseral.com, pete@ashland.or.us, peter@richardsonandoleary.com,
pfox@bracepatt.com, pljacklin@stoel.com, pmurphy@mbllp.com,
pnichols@idahopower.com, pobenchain@idahopower.com, pspi@dynegy.com,
pvickery@tpud.org, rachel@rnp.org, ratecase@pngc.com, rates@ppcpdx.org,
rbstron! g@painehamblen.com, rdb@keywaycorp.com, rfoiani@gcpud.org,
rkindley@schwabe.com, rle@givenspursley.com, rpierce@avistaenergy.com,
scott.brattebo@pacificorp.com, seligman@teleport.com, simonf@atg.wa.gov,
sjohnsto@wutc.wa.gov, skaravit@ci.tacoma.wa.us, stephens@eslerstephens.com,
steve@nwenergy.org, tdeboer@painehamblen.com, terrym@millcreeklaw.com,
tgrim@chbh.com, townsend@chbh.com, tracigrundon@dwt.com,
tstevenson@ci.burbank.ca.us, weavertr@yakima-wa.com, wmgt3@montana.com
		? ? ? ? cc: ? ? ? ?
		? ? ? ? Subject: ? ? ? ?WP-02 Data Request

request_number: ?DS-PN:002
firstname: ?Paul
lastname: ?Murphy
e-mail: ?bferranti@mbllp.com
directed_to: ?R. Erick Johnson, PNGC
exhibit_wp-02-e-: ?JCG-01, -02
page_numbers: ?
request_text: ?Please disclose and/or produce any and all communications from
October 16, 2001 to the present, between the BPA representatives listed below
and any representative of any other party concerning BPA's rates to be in
effect for Fiscal Years 2002-2006, the interactions of such rates and
customer contracts, or procedural aspects of these rate proceedings.

Bob Proctor ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Tim McCoy
Byrne Lovell
Byron Keep
Valerie Lefler
Jon Wright
Peter Berger

For purposes of this Request, "disclose and/or produce" has the meanings
described below. ?With respect to oral communications, "disclose and/or
produce" means to describe the time, date, approximate duration, and
substantive content of the communication; the identity and organizational
affiliation of the communicating individuals; whether the communication
occurred in person or by telephone; the location of the communication if in
person; the identity of any witnesses to the communications, including all
individuals in the room if the communication occurred by speakerphone; and
whether the communication was made in the presence of or after coordination
with BPA counsel (if so, identify such counsel). ?For purposes of this
Request, you need not "disclose and/or produce" oral communications that
occurred during meetings noticed in compliance with Rate Case Rule 1010.7(d).

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? With respect to written communications, the Request includes
communications in any recorded form, whether on paper, electronic (including,
without limitation, e-mails), or whatever form. ?For such communications,
"disclose and/or produce" means to provide copies of all non-identical
versions of any written communications and to describe with particularity the
location where such communications were found and/or stored, including the
identity of the individual with possession or control of the written
communications; to describe with particularity the circumstances under which
they were generated or referred to; and to fully "disclose and/or produce"
any oral communications made in connection with the written communications
consistent with the preceding paragraph. ?For purposes of this Request, you
need not produce papers served on all parties to the rate case and made part
of the official ! file in the rate case.

response_text: ?Response DS-PN:002

Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative (PNGC) objects to this Data Request
on the grounds that it (i) seeks information that is not relevant; (ii) seeks
information that is privileged; and (iii) seeks information that is unduly
burdensome to produce. ?Rules of Procedure Governing Rate Hearings, Section
1010.8(b). ?PNGC further objects to this Data Request on the grounds that it
is in improper form as it does not cite to specific testimony or indicate the
specific use to which the information sought will be put. ?Special Rules of
Practice, WP-02-01. ?Further, the Data Request PNGC received in hard copy of
March 12, 2001 covered communications from October 16, 2001 to the present,
of which there were none. ?PGNC hereby responds to the corrected Data
Requests received March 14, 2001 covering communications from October 16,
2000 to the present. Without waiving the foregoing objections, PNGC responds
as follows:

1. ? ? ? ?On or about January 26, 2001, Joe Nadal, PNGC, called Barney Keep,
BPA, in the afternoon and spoke with Mr. Keep for about five minutes. ?Mr.
Nadal stated that PNGC had concerns relating to the practical feasibility of
implementation details of proposed versions of LB CRAC methodology, i.e.
ability to get transparent monthly price quotes. ?No specific details or
alternatives were discussed. ?Mr. Nadal stated PNGC's interest in having BPA
and utility traders/schedulers attend an upcoming ?work session to give their
input. ?To the best of PNGC's knowledge, no other parties participated in
this telephone conversation.

2. ? ? ? ?On or about January 29, 2001, Joe Nadal, PNGC, called Ed Bleifus,
BPA, in the morning and spoke with Mr. Bleifus for about five minutes. ?Mr.
Nadal again stated that PNGC had concerns relating to the practical
feasibility of implementation details of proposed versions of LB CRAC
methodology, i.e. ability to get transparent monthly price quotes. ?Again, no
specific details or alternatives were discussed. ?Mr. Nadal reiterated PNGC's
interest in having BPA and utility traders/schedulers attend an upcoming
?work session to give their input. ?To the best of PNGC's knowledge, no other
parties participated in this telephone conversation.

3. ? ? ? ?On or about February 13, 2001, Erick Johnson, attorney for PNGC,
called Peter Burger, BPA OGC, at about 11:45 am, and spoke with Mr. Burger
for about three minutes. ?Mr. Johnson asked whether BPA would take the
position that the provisions of the "Partial Stipulation and Settlement
Agreement," WP-02-M-111, Exhibit A, Parties' Proposal, Section H, would
preclude PNGC from offering direct testimony the the first 990 aMW of DSI
service should be priced at market. ?Mr. Burger did not initially answer this
question. ?However, at about 1:40 pm on the same day, Mr. Burger called back
to say that BPA agreed that the Partial Stipulation did not preclude PNGC
from offering such testimony. ?This conversation lasted about two minutes.
?To the best of Mr. Johnson's knowledge, no other persons participated in
these telephone calls.

4. ? ? ? ?On or about February 23, 2001, Phill Sher, PNGC, had a conversation
with A. Perino, BPA, starting at about 11:30 am and lasting about one hour.
The topics discussed were not specifically related to the BPA WP-02 rate
case. The terms "cost recovery adjustment charge" or "CRAC" did not arise to
the best of Mr. Sher's recollection. Also, to the best of Mr. Sher's
recollection, the topics discussed were matters of general interest to
economists. ?The topics discussed included commodity prices and load
forecasting. ?

5. ? ? ? ?On or about March 6, 2001, Doug Brawley, PNGC, left a voice mail
message for Bob Procter, BPA, starting at about 3:00 pm and lasting about two
minutes. ?Mr. Brawley pointed out that in GRSPs Section Q- Low Density
Discount, Sub Section 7- Application of LDD to Slice, in the third line from
the bottom in paragraph 3, the words "Financial Based (FB) and Safety Net
(SN) should be inserted between (TAC) and CRAC - in order to properly reflect
the intent of the Settlement Proposal. ?Mr. Procter did not respond to this
voice mail message.


This request has been pending your approval for  45 days.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000024686&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000024686
Request Create Date : 3/21/01 8:04:40 AM
Requested For       : juan.padron@enron.com
Resource Name       : TradeWave NWOASIS
Resource Type       : Applications


Thank you for updating your profile information.
Updates as of 5/20/2001 are reflected below.
Please review your information:
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Account Nickname: snealtd1
Email Address: scott.neal@enron.com
Second Email Address: sneal12@mindspring.com
Wireless Email Address:  N/A

Documents regarding your account will be sent as follows:
~*~ Statements: by US Mail
~*~ Trade Confirmations: by US Mail
For all documents that you have agreed to receive online,
we will send you an email notification when a new document is available.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

You can update this information at any time at
http://www.tdwaterhouse.com
in "My Info" under "My Account".

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Questions? Email us at eservices@tdwaterhouse.com
Please do not send sensitive information as email is not secure.
Thank you for investing with TD Waterhouse.


This is great

---------------------- Forwarded by Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT on 03/17/2000 10:05
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kori Loibl                           03/17/2000 09:57 AM

To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin
Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tony Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Having a bad day?

---------------------- Forwarded by Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT on 03/17/2000 09:55 AM
---------------------------

Purvi Patel
03/17/2000 08:20 AM
To: Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Otis Wathington/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: FW: Having a bad day?

this is funny

HAVING A BAD DAY?

For all of you who occasionally have a really bad day  when you just need to
take it out on  someone!!!? Don't take that bad day out on someone you know,
take it out on someone you DON'T know!!!

Now get this.? I was sitting at my desk, when I  remembered a phone call I
had
to make. I  found the number and dialed it.

A man answered nicely saying, "Hello?"

I politely said, "This is Patrick Hannifin, could I  please speak to Robin
Carter?"

Suddenly the phone was slammed down on me!? I  couldn't believe that anyone
could be that  rude.

I tracked down Robin's correct number and called  her.? I had transposed the
last two  digits incorrectly.

After I hung up with Robin, I spotted the wrong  number still lying there on
my  desk.

I decided to call it again.

When the same person once more answered, I  yelled? "You're a jackass!" and
hung  up.

Next to his phone number I wrote the word?  "jackass," and put it in my desk
drawer.

Every couple of weeks, when I was paying bills, or  had a really bad day, I'd
call him  up.

He'd answer, and I'd yell, "You're a jackass!". It  would always cheer me up.

Later in the year the phone company introduced caller  ID.? This was a real
disappointment for  me, I would have to stop calling the jackass.

Then one day I had an idea.? I dialed his  number, then heard his
voice,"Hello."

I made up a name.? "Hi, this is Mike Smith with  the sales office of the
telephone company and  I'm just calling to see if you're familiar with our
caller ID program?"

He went, "No!" and slammed the phone down.? I  quickly called him back and
said, "That's  because you're a jackass!"

[Keep reading, it gets better.]

An old lady at the mall really took her time pulling  out of the parking
place. I didn't think she  was ever going to leave.

Finally, she got the car in reverse and she began to  move ... very slowly
backing out of the  slot.

I backed up a little more to give her plenty of room  to pull out.

Great, I thought, she's finally leaving.

All of a sudden this black Camaro comes flying up the  parking aisle in the
wrong direction and  pulls into her space.

I started honking my horn and yelling, "You can't  just do that, Buddy. I was
here  first!"

The guy climbed out of his Camaro completely ignoring  me.? He walked toward
the mall as if he didn't even hear me.

I thought to myself, this guy's a jackass, there sure  a lot of jackasses in
this world.

Then I noticed he had a "For Sale" sign in the back  window of his car.

I wrote down the number. Then I hunted for another  place to park.

A couple of days later, I'm at home sitting at my  desk.? I had just gotten
off the phone  after calling my jackass friend and yelling, "You're a
jackass!"? (It's
really easy to call him now since I have his number  on speed dial.)

I noticed the phone number of the guy with the black  Camaro lying on my desk
and thought I'd  better call this guy, too.

After a couple rings someone answered the phone and  said, "Hello."? I said,
"Is this the man  with the black Camaro for sale?"

"Yes, it is."

"Can you tell me where I can see it?"

"Yes, I live at 1802 West 34th street.? It's a  yellow house and the car's
parked right out  front."

I said, "What's your name?"

"My name is Don Hansen."

"When's a good time to catch you, Don?"

"I'm home in the evenings."

"Listen Don, can I tell you something?"

"Yes."

"Don, you're a jackass!"? And I slammed the  phone down.

After I hung up I added Don Hansen's number to my  speed dialer.

For a while things, seemed to be going better for  me.

Now when I had a problem I had two jackasses to  call.

Then, after several months of calling the jackasses  and hanging up on them,
it just wasn't as  enjoyable as it used to be.

I gave the problem some serious thought and came up  with a solution:

First, I had my phone dial Jackass #1.

A man answered nicely saying,"Hello."

I yelled "You're a jackass!", but I didn't hang  up.

The jackass said, "Are you still there?"

I said, "Yeah."

He said, "Stop calling me."

I said, "No."

He said, "What's your name, Pal?"

I said, "Don Hansen."

He said "Where do you live?"

"1802 West 34th Street.? It's a yellow house and  my black Camaro's parked
out
front."

"I'm coming over right now, Don.? You'd better  start saying your prayers."

"Yeah, like I'm really scared, Jackass!" and I hung  up.

Then I called Jackass #2.? He answered,  "Hello."

I said, "Hello, Jackass!"

He said, "If I ever find out who you  are..."

"You'll what?"

"I'll kick your butt."

"Well, here's your chance.? I'm coming over  right now, Jackass!"

And I hung up.

Then I picked up the phone and called the  police.

I told them I was at 1802 West 34th Street and that I  was going to kill my
gay lover as soon as he  got home.

Another quick call to Channel 13 about the gang war  going on down W. 34th
Street.

After that I climbed into my car and headed over to  34th Street to watch the
whole  thing.

Glorious!? Watching two Jackasses kicking the  crap out of each other in
front
of 6 squad  cars, a police helicopter, and channel 13 news cameras!!!

It was one of the greatest experiences of my  life!

Names changed to protect the guilty.

O.K. Now stop laughing and crying, people are going to think you are a nut;
especially the people on the other side of your wall.


Jason,

See if this is what you were looking for.  (After pressing 'Fetch', check
column 'N' on Results tab.)

Call me if you have any questions,

Hal McKinney
x53707


Mike Day believes that SCE might agree to a new Stipulation in which they commit to pay our claim if their new deal and their pending Advice Letter are approved by the CPUC.  I have scheduled a call for tomorrow at 12:30 CST to discuss the terms we would like to see in the Stipulation (e.g., drop approval of the Advice Letter as a condition, payment within 10 days after CPUC approval, agreement on the number set forth in our response to their Data Request, agreement to apply accrued negative CTC credits to current T&D charges, to name a few).   On the other hand a delay in this proceeding is probably in our interest, in view of the SCE Counterclaim.  Going this route would probably be in lieu of some of the other alternatives we discussed, so I believe we will need to get senior management't approval to any agreement.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES on 08/09/2000 01:01
PM ---------------------------

djcustomclips@djinteractive.com on 08/09/2000 02:00:36 PM
Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 1529@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
cc:
Subject: Enron Corp.: Calif. city contracts with Enron to protect from
volatility

Calif. city contracts with Enron to protect from volatility

08/08/2000
Megawatt Daily
(c) Copyright 2000 Pasha Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  A small California city that currently buys one-third of its
electricity on the wholesale market has turned to Enron Power Marketing
for protection from price volatility.

  The City of Roseville, which operates a municipal electric utility,
last week signed a five-year contract with Enron, beginning Sept. 1,
under which Enron will provide the city with 50 MW around-the-clock at a
fixed price of $49/MWh. The total bill to the city will come to $114
million.
  "One-third of our needs today, we have to go the market," said Tom
Habashi, director of Roseville Electric. The muni, which has a peak
summer load of 240 MW to 250 MW, obtains about one-third of its power
needs from the Western Area Power Administration and the remaining third
from generating units it owns through the Northern California Power
Agency.

  Hot weather in June drove demand much higher than Roseville had
predicted earlier in the year, Habashi said. Power consumption in July
was below predictions, but prices were twice as high as had been
forecast. The cost for power in August is expected to remain much higher
than predicted, Habashi said.

  Once the summer months have passed, Roseville expects to pay about $6
million more than it had budgeted for wholesale power expenses. That,
Habashi said, led the city to look for alternatives.

  "We had to weigh things out, see whether we are willing to take the
risk of market price fluctuations and pass those prices along to
customers," he said.

  On the flipside, he noted, prices could go below the fixed rate
Roseville will pay to Enron through September 2005. The city, through a
vote of the City Council last Friday, chose to contract with Enron
despite the potential risk. Habashi said the contract "will give us some
stability."

  Another unknown variable, Habashi said, is how many Roseville
customers will switch power providers. A few were given the option at
the beginning of this year, but none have left yet. Choice for all
customers will be phased in over four years.

  The city, which is located about 15 miles from Sacramento, expects
rapid residential and business growth, and is forecasting that its
electricity needs will double by 2005.         ML

Folder Name: Enron Corp.
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 83

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Thanks.  Sorry , I seem to be taking up alot of your time lately!

DG    3-9573


Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2001
Issue: Electricity Crisis, Potential Natural Gas Crisis
What is Happening: Check-in Session
BACKGROUND
"California could cut electricity consumption by as much as 4 percent this
summer under a plan that aims to shift the
way the cost of power is communicated and billed to the state's biggest
users. The $35 million program, which has
been endorsed by Gov. Gray Davis and is being considered by state
regulators, would entail installing 15,000 new
meters and upgrading 5,000 more to reflect the hourly price of electricity.
The state's largest users, (the 21,000
customers who consume more than 200 kilowatts of electricity at any given
time,) would receive the meters and have
the option of participating in "real-time" pricing. By using these meters,
they can moderate their behavior to use less
when supply is tight or more when it is available" (Contra Costa Times
4-24-01).
RECENT CHANGES AND DEVELOPMENTS
"SB 28X (Sher) passed out of the Assembly yesterday on a 67-4 vote. The
legislation is expected to cost the state $3.2
million to implement. Key provisions of SB 28x would: (1) Require cities,
counties and other local agencies to
submit initial comments on a power plant application within 45 days of its
filing. (2) Require the California Energy
Commission to issue final decisions on certifying "repowering" projects --
modernization of existing plants -- within
180 days, instead of a year. (3) Extend by 17 months -- until Dec. 31,
2002 -- an expedited siting process
for temporary power plants, known as "peakers." (4) Mandate that power
plants required to renovate their facilities
to reduce air pollution do so by Jan. 1, 2004, under the auspices of the
state Air Resources Board. (5) Require
payment of unemployment-compensation benefits to workers left jobless in any
week because of unscheduled power
outages caused by shortages of supply. (6) Provide incentives for
"distributed generation" in which homeowners or
merchants produce electricity for themselves and others using solar panels,
turbines or other such equipment. Utility
fees, called "standby charges," would be waived up to 10 years for most such
customers (Sacramento Bee 4-24-01). ?
"Los Angeles County government expects to nearly double its energy bill for
next year, from $75 million to a
whopping $140 million, a hike that will cut into the county's surplus and
could force service cuts if prices continue to
rise through what all sides predict will be a difficult year in the state's
energy crisis" (LA Times 4-24-01). "California
has spent $5.1 billion from the state budget purchasing electricity this
year" (LA Times 4-24-01).
WHAT THE REPUBLICANS ARE SAYING
Assembly Republicans supported SB 28x, which passed Monday by a vote of
67-4, but some said it doesn't go
far enough in solving the energy crisis. "We'd like to see more siting
bills," said Assemblyman Tony Strickland,
R-Thousand Oaks. "We need more electricity supply and generation. Anyone who
thinks this is enough to solve
the crisis is really in Disneyland."
The Assembly Republican Caucus ? Member Services Division
916-319-3901
THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY
"California's economy is decelerating, and the state is spending many
billions of dollars -- how many, exactly, is still
unknown -- on power purchases to prevent blackouts. The combined effect of
these separate, if interrelated, factors
is to hammer the state budget in ways that no one in the Capitol considered
possible. The Davis administration's
bean counters have concluded, Capitol sources said Monday, that the state's
revenues for the 2001-02 fiscal year will
run several billion dollars under forecasts, thanks largely to the severe
decline in the state's high-technology industry.
The state could absorb a sharp dip in its tax revenues if its reserves were
available. Davis had anticipated starting the
2001-02 fiscal year July 1 with $6.6 billion in general-fund reserves and
ending it a year later with nearly $4 billion still
in the kitty. The newly discovered revenue shortfall would have reduced the
reserves but not wiped them out. Those
numbers, however, don't take into account the nearly $6 billion that the
state has committed to buying power,
continuing at the rate of $2 billion a month, and only a tiny portion of the
outlay being covered by utility
ratepayers. At current rates, the state will be in the hole by $10 billion
by July 1" (Sacramento Bee 4-24-01).


SORRY I gave you the incorrect deal number for this error.  Should be deal
549052.

original error:
Diana Scholtes
deal 549053    549052
Prebon shows price as $141 and delivery pt as Mid-C

Diana Scholtes
Prebon broker said our price (215) and del. point (Cob) are right

S

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:39 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout

Prebon
Sean Crandall
549048 - changed to NP

Diana Scholtes
Prebon broker said our price (215) and del. point (Cob) are right

Jeff Richter
549013 - changed to APB

549010 - enron buys BP/Apr01/NP/peak/207.00 (in with Amerex - should it be
Prebon?)

Chris Mallory - just entered Williams deal

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:27 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/13 Checkout

AMEREX
All deals checked out fine

PREBON

Sean Crandall
deal 549048
Prebon shows del. point as NP-15

Diana Scholtes
deal 549053
Prebon shows price as $141 and delivery pt as Mid-C

Jeff Richter
deal 549013
Prebon does not recognize

I am missing the following:
1) Enron buys from BP Energy 25 mw of April'01 NP-15 peak hrs at $207
2) Enron buys Williams 25 mw of SP-15 of April'01 off-peak hrs at $107

BLOOMBERG
All deals checked out fine.


Brent will be in a little late today.


Dude,

Are we any closer to an agreement for Michiwest to move through our Maverick
system??

Mike


I am looking for a way to assist a co-worker that is under stress with a wife with health problems, a baby and two other children at home.  I am interested in getting details about how I might pre-pay for a two-week personal chef service.

Could you give me a quote on two-week service to this family located in the Copperfield area?
Would you deliver the pre-made meals to the home?  Could the gift recipient select the menu items?

Shelley Corman
713-853-7083


Below is the exact wording of the recommendations in the Cheney energy report
released today as the recommendations relate to electricity issues.

"The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Secretary of Energy
to propose comprehensive electricity legislation that promotes competition,
protects consumers, enhances reliability, promotes renewable energy, improves
efficiency, repeals the Public Utility Holding Company Act, and reforms the
Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act."

"The NEPD Group recommends that the President encourage FERC to use its
existing statutory authority to promote competition and encourage investment
in transmission facilities."

More details to follow.  We expect to have the full report document shortly.


Randy,

Yesterday, Sunday the 24th, one of the Gas Control Dispatchers was stuck in an elevator for approximately 5 hours. Apparently the alarm and the intercom were not functioning and she had no way of notifying anyone that she was stuck between the 39th floor and the plaza. After other dispatchers became concerned about her being missing and searched for her, it was 2 hours before they determined she was stuck in an elevator. It then took another 3 hours to repair the elevator and get her out. We were advised by one of the guards that the weekly test and inspection of the intercoms was not performed on Saturday, as scheduled. We also were led to believe that the level of maintenance and monitoring of the elevators has recently changed.

As you know, the Gas Control Center on EB42 is a 7X24 operation. It goes without saying that this type of situation is unacceptable and that a post-mortem of the event is required to correct any maintenance or operating deficiencies that may exist. Please research the event and let us know the root cause of the elevator failure, the intercom failure, and any changes in maintenance and monitoring that may have contributed.

Thanks, Gary

Gary Kenagy
ETS Information Technology
713-853-3094
gary.kenagy@enron.com


Thanks for the feedback. I sent my best guy there so I hope there is
improvement. We have been talking to a candidate for credit that Ted will be
discussing with you soon. Hopefully we can make progress there also. I want
complete buy in from you and John on this guy before we proceed.

Separately, the scrap metals meeting we had with Causey went well. We will
reconvene in two weeks to see where we are.

Thanks again for the feedback. I was a little worried about Ted after the MD
disappointment but it seems he has recovered.

Rick


Philip,

I'm sorry this took so long, I thought I sent it ealier, but apparently not.
Let me know if you need anything else.

Mat


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001 08:24 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           03/08/2001 05:53 PM

To:	Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Rebook - QU0663 Mirant

Eric,

Can you adjust TAGG shortname to MIRANTAMEENE  (currently MIRANTAMEENECAN)?

Thanks,
Joe


I have some questions myself about the data contained below, but it is
largely accurate, and for those of you following Europe from afar, I thought
this summary was a convenient way to share with you the status of
developments in Europe.   call if you have any questions.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 12/12/2000
16:44 ---------------------------

Kyran Hanks
12/12/2000 16:02
To: Paul Turner/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Manasse/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Oliver/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Saltiel/LON/ECT@ECT, Ron Bertasi/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stuart G Rexrode/LON/ECT@ECT, Patrick Bastien/LON/ECT@ECT, Kirsten
Wolf/LON/ECT@ECT, David Haworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Patricia Graham/LON/ECT@ECT,
Hala Tayyarah/LON/ECT@ECT, Christoph Waltenspuel/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Greiner/FRA/ECT@ECT, Jackson Vo/HOU/EES@EES, Dung Tran/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt. Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Doug
Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Sadia Haider/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Country and EU liberalisation summaries

All

Given the number of requests that we have for country summaries, Sadia has
put together these two files.  The first of these files contains for each
country of the EU, for power and gas, a description of each country's
deregulation, and current issues.  I think we will update this every month or
so.

The second file contains some EU wide stuff - maps of liberalisation, the
flags showing liberalisation etc.

Let me know if you need anything else - our next step is to add reported
price data.  These are also on the s:\ees\risk mgt\presentations shared space

Enjoy.

K.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kyran Hanks/LON/ECT on 12/12/2000 15:59
---------------------------

Sadia Haider
07/12/2000 16:43
To: Kyran Hanks/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: country slides


Team,

As I mentioned in our HPL staff meeting we are investigating the merits of
entering into a joint venture or another transaction structure that will
position HPL to effectively compete in the Texas intrastate market.  Our
primary objective is to gain access to additional sources of gas supply and
achieve the required economies of scale to compete with other intrastate
pipelines. I would appreciate your confidence and support in developing the
optimal course of action for HPL and for Enron.

The skills that we have developed in our group are critical to growing our
Upstream Origination business in N. America, as well as to the ongoing
operation of HPL.  Our origination strategy is to leverage our business
operations, field operations, engineering, producer services, and marketing
skills to capture value from transportation, gathering, storage and commodity
opportunities on the gas/power grids.   We need our current employees to
accomplish this objective across N. America.

We have proven our ability to add value to Enron by developing the
Powder/Wind River pipelines, installing electric compressors, contracting for
processing capacity, and establishing a new gas supply corridor along the
Gulf Coast.  Our recent efforts to provide services such as business
operations, measurement, trading/marketing, and accounting services to third
party producers and pipelines also looks to be a promising growth opportunity.

It is very important to our ongoing business relationships and our
competitive position in the market place that we DO NOT discuss HPL related
matters with third parties.  Please come see me if you have any specific
questions or concerns.  Also please refer any third party inquiries regarding
HPL to Tim Determing.

Regards,
Brian


Thought you guys might like to know that our voice mail system is down until
later this afternoon. Also, I'm filling in for one of the California
Schedulers who'll be out of the office for an indefinite period. Please reach
me on this extension until further notice (yours and mine!):

(503) 464-3827

Or, if it's an emergency and you can't seem to make it out of the tangled web
of receptionists and other phone-answerers, call my cell phone at (503)
819-2181. And of course, there's always e-mail.

I apologize for the confusion and for any inconvenience this may cause.
Thanks for bearing with us!

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/26/2001 08:37 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Guzman                           04/25/2001 08:47 PM

To: Portland West Desk
cc:

Subject: Voice Mail Outage 4/25-4/26

At approximately 6:30 pm on 4/25 Ruth Ashe with PGE notified Enron that there
will be a voice mail outage starting the evening of 4/25 and running thru 2pm
on 4/26.  If you have any questions or concerns please contact her at
503-464-8663 or 503-323-1254.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.


FYI, Kent Shoemaker (GE lawyer for LM's)  is on vacation today, but I believe
he will be back in the office next Monday.

Kay


We have received an executed financial Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   February 17, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Bear Paw Energy LLC

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of: Pulp,
Lumber & Paper
          Foreign Exchange

Confirming Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Governing Law:   New York

Copies will be distributed.

Stephanie Panus


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Mahoney, Peggy
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 10:30 AM
To:	All EES@ENRON
Subject:	What Enron Did Right

A great editorial in the Wall Street Journal today.

Manager's Journal:
What Enron Did Right
By Samuel Bodily and Robert Bruner

11/19/2001
The Wall Street Journal
A20
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  This is a rough era for American business icons. Subject to the
vagaries of age (Jack Welch), product failure (Ford/Firestone tires),
competition (Lucent, AT&T), technology (Hewlett-Packard and Compaq), and
dot-bomb bubbles (CMGI), managers and their firms remind us that being
an icon is risky business. The latest example is Enron, whose fall from
grace has resulted in a proposed fire sale to Dynegy.

   Once considered one of the country's most innovative companies, Enron
became a pariah due to lack of transparency about its deals and the odor
of conflicts of interest. The journalistic accounts of Enron's struggles
drip with schadenfreude, hinting that its innovations and achievements
were all a mirage.
   We hold no brief regarding the legal or ethical issues under
investigation. We agree that more transparency about potential conflicts
of interest is needed. High profitability does not justify breaking the
law or ethical norms. But no matter how the current issues resolve
themselves or what fresh revelations emerge, Enron has created an
enormous legacy of good ideas that have enduring value.

   -- Deregulation and market competition. Enron envisioned gas and
electric power industries in the U.S. where prices are set in an open
market of bidding by customers, and where suppliers can freely choose to
enter or exit. Enron was the leader in pioneering this business.

   Market competition in energy is now the dominant model in the U.S.,
and is spreading to Europe, Latin America, and Asia. The winners have
been consumers, who have paid lower prices, and investors, who have seen
competition force the power suppliers to become much more efficient. The
contrary experience of California, the poster child of those who would
re-regulate the power industry, is an example of not enough
deregulation.

   -- Innovation and the "de-integration" of power contracts. Under the
old regulated model of delivering gas and electricity, customers were
offered a one-size-fits-all contract. For many customers, this system
was inflexible and inefficient, like telling a small gardener that you
can only buy manure by the truckload. Enron pioneered contracts that
could be tailored to the exact needs of the customer.

   To do this, Enron unbundled the classic power contract into its
constituent parts, starting with price and volume, location, time, etc.,
and offered customers choices on each one. Again, consumers won. Enron's
investors did too, because Enron earned the surplus typically reaped by
inventors. Arguably, Enron is the embodiment of what economist Joseph
Schumpeter called the "process of Creative Destruction." But creative
destroyers are not necessarily likable, pleasant folks, which may be
part of Enron's problem today.

   -- Minimization of transaction costs and frictions. Enron extended
the logic of de-integration to other industries. An integrated paper
company, for instance, owns forests, mills, pulp factories, and paper
plants in what amounts to a very big bet that the paper company can run
all those disparate activities better than smaller, specialized firms.
Enron argued that integrated firms and industries are riddled with
inefficiencies stemming from bureaucracy and the captive nature of
"customers" and "suppliers." Enron envisioned creating free markets for
components within the integrated chain on the bet that the free-market
terms would be better than those of the internal operations. The
development of free-market benchmarks for the terms by which divisions
of integrated firms do business with each other is very healthy for the
economy.

   -- Exploiting the optionality in networks. In the old regulated
environment, natural gas would be supplied to a customer through a
single dedicated pipeline. Enron envisioned a network by which gas could
be supplied from a number of possible sources, opening the customer to
the benefits of competition, and the supplier to the flexibility of
alternative sourcing strategies. Enron benefited from controlling
switches on the network, so that they could nimbly route the molecules
or electrons from the best source at any moment in time to the best use,
and choose when and where to convert molecules to electrons. This
policy, picked up by others in the industry, created tremendous value
for both customers and suppliers.

   -- Rigorous risk assessment. The strategy of tailored contracts could
easily have broken the firm in the absence of a clear understanding of
the trading risks that the firm assumed, and of very strong internal
controls. Enron pioneered risk assessment and control systems that we
judge to be among the best anywhere. Particularly with the advent of
Enron Online, where Enron made new positions valued at over $4 billion
each day, it became essential to have up-to-the-second information on
company-wide positions, prices and ability to deliver.

   The unexpected bad news from Enron has little to do with trading
losses by the firm, but with fears among trading partners about Enron's
ability to finance its trading activity. In a world where contracts and
trading portfolios are too complex to explain in a sound bite,
counterparties look to a thick equity base for assurance. It was the
erosion in equity, rather than trading risk, that destroyed the firm.

   -- A culture of urgency, innovation and high expectations. Enron's
corporate culture was the biggest surprise of all. The Hollywood
stereotype of a utility company is bureaucratic, hierarchical, formal,
slow, and full of excuses. And the stodgy images of a gas pipeline
company -- Enron only 15 years ago -- is even duller and slower. Enron
became bumptious, impatient, lean, fast, innovative, and demanding. It
bred speed and innovation by giving its professionals unusual freedom to
start new businesses, create markets, and transfer within the firm.

   Success was rewarded with ample compensation and fast promotion, and
an open-office design fostered brainstorming. The firm's organization
and culture was by all accounts not a safe haven for those who believe
the role of a large corporation is to fulfill entitlements for jobs.
This was a lightning rod for the firm's detractors. And yet, it could
serve as a model for more hide-bound enterprises to emulate.

   Enron was a prolific source of compelling new ideas about the
transformation of American business. It created a ruckus in once-quiet
corners of the business economy. It rewrote the rules of competition in
almost every area in which it did business. It thrived on volatility.

   The proposed sale of Enron to Dynegy risks the loss of a major R&D
establishment, especially given Dynegy's track record as a second mover
following Enron's lead. Beyond what is likely to be a difficult and
time-consuming antitrust review, Dynegy's greater challenge will be to
find a way to make Enron's spirit of innovation its own. Or so we all
should hope, because prosperity depends on the ability of firms to
reinvent themselves and remake their industries.

   ---

   Messrs. Bodily and Bruner are professors at the University of
Virginia's Graduate School of Business Administration.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
11:47 AM ---------------------------

Mike Grigsby
03/07/2001 08:05 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: matt Smith

Let's have Matt start on the following:

Database for hourly storage activity on Socal.  Begin forecasting hourly and
daily activity by backing out receipts, using ISO load actuals and backing
out real time imports to get in state gen numbers for gas consumption, and
then using temps to estimate core gas load.  Back testing once he gets
database created should help him forecast core demand.

Update Socal and PG&E forecast sheets.  Also, break out new gen by EPNG and
TW pipelines.

Mike


During the course of their investigation, Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation will be taking documents they believe may be important for their investigation from employees' offices.  The FBI has agreed to return copies of such documents.

In addition, should you have an immediate need for a document requested by the FBI, please make a copy of the specific document and give the original to the FBI. Thank you for your cooperation.