-----Original Message-----
From: 	Bhatia, Randy
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:55 AM
To:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Keiser, Kam; Jones, Brad; O'Rourke, Ryan; Pehlivanova, Biliana
Subject:	FW: DYN($42/sh)/ENE($7/sh) Merger At Risk. - Simmons and Company latest thoughts

got this from a friend at dynegy.  written by someone at Simmons & Co., Inc.

                                         To:     Sales Trading
                    11/21/01 07:42       cc:
                    AM                   Subject:     DYN($42/sh)/ENE
($7/sh) Merger At
                                          Risk.

SUMMARY:  We are reducing our estimated probability that the DYN/ENE merger
is completed to less than 50%/50% based on our belief that ENE's existing
wholesale and retail businesses are having a difficult time maintaining
their volumes and margins.  We have discussed ENE's need to improve counter
party confidence on a number of occasions over the last few weeks, and we
believe counter party confidence deteriorated further based on the
information included in the 10Q, and the strong negative reaction in the
stock and bond markets yesterday.  The tone of our discussions with
competing traders and marketers (representative of ENE's counter
parties--which are critical in maintaining ENE's volumes) is becoming more
negative.  While ENE is continuing to confirm that volumes are improving
since the lows on November 9, our market intelligence is suggesting
improment has stalled.  In addition and probably related, ENE's liquidity
position seems to be continuing to deteriorate despite significant recent
capital infusions.  We are reducing 4Q01 estimates to reflect lower volume
and margin assumptions.  What would get us more comfortable?  ENE 8K
disclosure confirming higher volume and decent margins (ENE has committed
to provide 4Q guidance by early-mid December, and/or a change in the tone
of the counter parties that would suggest they are increasing trading
activities with ENE.

OPINION ON THE STOCKS:
   ENE.  No change in our opinion on ENE--the upside potential is simply
   not worth the downside risk.
   DYN.  DYN is likely to benefit in almost all outcomes.  If our concerns
   about counter party confidence prove to be wrong, the upside associated
   with the accretion in the transaction would likely be huge.  However, we
   sense DYN is getting frustrated by continued restatement of earnings,
   unexpected debt triggers and worse than expected liquidity problems.  If
   the transaction falls apart, DYN would have some transaction costs that
   would negatively impact cash flow in the near-term, but DYN would
   benefit from gaining market share and hiring some of ENE's talent away
   longer term.  A potential downside case for DYN is that DYN retrades the
   deal on recent information, but is forced to reduced its flexibility to
   terminate the transaction through material adverse change
   considerations, this out come would concern us.  We continue to believe
   DYN is a solid long-term holding for investors.  However, we are
   recommending caution with new money, due to our belief that DYN still
   has $5/sh to $7/sh of "deal" premium factored into the current stock
   price which could be at risk if the deal fails.  We do not believe DYN
   has significant accounts receivable exposure to ENE in the event the ENE
   has further liquidity problems (we believe DYN's trading agreement with
   ENE limits exposure to maybe $100 to $150 MM).

COUNTER PARTY INCENTIVES:  ENE identified in its 10Q that transaction
volume (especially long-term transactions) have declined since the 3Q.  If
you are a utility or industrial customer, why enter into a long-term
transaction with ENE?  Why not go directly to DYN or diversify with other
suppliers?  If you are a natural gas or power producer, why create the
account receivable risk?  If you are a counter party, strategically why
would you contribute to the continuation of the ENE machine--to the
ultimate benefit of strengthening another competitor (DYN)?  We believe
that ENE is offering attractive financial incentives (premium purchases
and/or discounted sales) to entice counter parties to trade with them.
However, this would also suggest ENE margins may be getting squeezed.

EPS ESTIMATES (new/old/consensus):
   4Q01-$0.20/0.35/0.42, FY01-$1.55/1.70/1.78, FY02-$1.50/1.50/1.90
   We are reducing expectations for margins in the Wholesale segment from
   9cts/mmbtu to 7cts/mmbtu--negatively impacting 4Q EPS by 10cts/sh.  In
   addition, we expect contributions from Enron Energy Services will be
   lower due to challenges in closing long-term transactions (much of EES's
   earnings are mark-to-market recognition of the value created in
   long-term agreeements) impacting our estimate by 5cts/sh.

*****************************************************************************************************

This e-mail is based on information obtained from sources which Simmons &
Company International believes to be reliable, but Simmons & Company
International does not represent or warrant its accuracy.  The opinions and
estimates contained in this e-mail represent the views of Simmons & Company
as of the date of the e-mail, and may be subject to change without prior
notice.  Simmons & Company International, its partners and/or employees may
have positions in the securities discussed.  Simmons & Company
International may make a market in the securities discussed and may have
served as a financial advisor and/or underwriter to companies discussed.
Simmons & Company International will not be responsible for the consequence
of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained in this e-mail.  This
e-mail is confidential, and may not be reproduced,  in whole or in part,
without the prior written permission of Simmons & Company International.


This provision is an election which we have added to the Schedule for
governmental entities.  I believe that it is intended to eliminate any
confusion that historically arose during the debate between "First Method"
(one-way payments) and "Second Method" (two-way payments) for Early
Termination purposes.  Although I can't find a good reason to continue to use
this provision with an ISDA (except that it emphasizes the point), I can
understand why we may have added it to a pre-ISDA agreement with a
governmental.  The only example that I could locate was our September 21,
1995 Master Agreement with Reedy Creek Improvement District.  For those of
you who have never seen this form, it was one of the two types of master
agreements developed by ECT before we became conversant with ISDA.  Because
these forms didn't contemplate municipal counterparties, we had to add many
of the ISDA U.S. Municipal Counterparty Schedule provisions.  The Part
5(b)(k) provision originally appeared in this early agreement.  It was
included in the "Event of Change" section [5F(4)] (which is tantamount to the
ISDA concept of "Illegality", a "Termination Event").  I think it was
probably included because in the ISDA, Second Method is the automatic payment
method if the parties fail to make a specific designation for Early
Termination purposes, but there isn't a comparable provision in the old ECT
form.


October 16, 2001
Southwest Airlines' Click 'n Save E-mail Update

A message to our Customers:

Southwest Airlines is devoted to bringing you the most
up-to-date information needed prior to traveling.
Visit southwest.com for updates on airport operations,
ticketing requirements, security procedures, and
details on the new FAA mandated carryon policy.

As always, we are committed to putting our Customers
first and dedicated to keeping fares low.  We will strive
to "Keep America Flying."

When you're ready to fly, we're here.

Luv,
33,000+ Employees of Southwest Airlines

*****************Important Travel Information******************

For updated travel information, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/travelAdvisory.html

**************This week's specials include:*******************

1. Click 'n Save Internet Specials
2. southwest.com Anniversary Specials for $30 Each Way
3. southwest.com Featured Destination
4. Southwest Airlines Vacations' Specials
5. Subscriber Information

************** Click 'n Save Internet Specials ****************
This week's specials are available for travel any day of the
week with a 7-day advance purchase requirement.

Specials available this week are:

Albany, NY
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Albuquerque, NM
 $63 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Amarillo, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Austin, TX
 $72 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $56 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $66 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $46 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Birmingham, AL
 $64 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX

Boise, ID
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $89 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Burbank, CA
  $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Chicago Midway, IL
 $67 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $41 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $89 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $44 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $87 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $41 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE

Cleveland, OH
 $74 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $46 one-way, to/from Norfolk/Southern, VA

Columbus, OH
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Corpus Christi, TX
 $48 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $66 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Dallas Love Field, TX
 $48 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX

Detroit, MI
 $43 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

El Paso, TX
 $62 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $72 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $74 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $67 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $56 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Houston Hobby, TX
 $64 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $42 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $89 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
 $56 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Indianapolis, IN
 $56 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Jacksonville, FL
 $66 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $44 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Kansas City, MO
 $41 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Las Vegas, NV
 $63 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $62 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $40 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
 $43 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $89 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $67 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Los Angeles, CA
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $50 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Louisville, KY
 $43 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $64 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Lubbock, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $65 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Manchester, NH
 $89 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Nashville, TN
 $46 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $44 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $89 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
 $42 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

New Orleans, LA - Featured Destination
 $89 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $89 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $89 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $72 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $89 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $89 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $89 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $87 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $74 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH
 $89 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
 $66 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $89 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $72 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $74 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $42 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $44 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $89 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $89 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $67 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $89 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $89 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $64 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY
 $89 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
 $89 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $64 one-way, to/from Norfolk/Southern, VA
 $89 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $67 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $89 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $89 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL
 $89 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $89 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $89 one-way, to/from Providence, RI
 $64 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $89 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $89 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA
 $89 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $58 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
 $89 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
 $89 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $89 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA
 $85 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
 $46 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL
 $66 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK
 $70 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Norfolk/Southern, VA
 $46 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH
 $64 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Oakland, CA
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $65 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Oklahoma City, OK
 $67 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Omaha, NE
 $41 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Ontario, CA
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Orlando, FL
 $46 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Phoenix, AZ
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $53 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $58 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA

Portland, OR
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $43 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Providence, RI
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $42 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $64 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $43 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $48 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Sacramento, CA
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $50 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $53 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

San Antonio, TX
 $65 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX
 $58 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

San Diego, CA
 $40 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

San Jose, CA
 $43 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $58 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $48 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Spokane, WA
 $89 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

St. Louis, MO
 $89 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $85 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Tampa Bay, FL
 $46 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Tucson, AZ
 $65 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $56 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $56 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $66 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

West Palm Beach, FL
 $89 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $70 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA

Details for this week's southwest.com Internet Specials:

*Available only on southwest.com.
*7-day advance purchase required.
*Available on published, scheduled service.
*Travel any day of the week
*Fares shown are one-way and do not include federal
 excise tax of up to $3.00 for each flight segment.
 (a segment is defined as a takeoff and landing)
*Fares do not include airport-assessed passenger
 facility charges (PFC) of up to $9 one-way.
*Fares are nonrefundable, but (except for tickets
 purchased through our Group Tickets Program)
 may be applied toward future travel on Southwest Airlines.
*Travel through end of schedule, except for
 November 20, 21, 25, and 26, December 21, 22,
 28-30, 2001, and January 1, 2002.
*Purchase through October 18, 2001,  midnight Pacific Time.
*Fares are available one-way or can be combined
 with other fare types.  Most restrictive rules of combined
 fares will apply.
*Penalty applies to any changes made after purchasing
 Southwest Internet Specials.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml?src=1016

************ southwest.com Anniversary Specials **************

$30 Each Way on Select Markets with a 7-day advance
purchase requirement and travel any day of the week.

This week's Anniversary markets are:

Albuquerque, NM
 $30 one-way, to/from  Amarillo, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  El Paso, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Lubbock, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Midland/Odessa, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Phoenix, AZ
 $30 one-way, to/from  Tucson, AZ

Amarillo, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Albuquerque, NM
 $30 one-way, to/from  Dallas Love Field, TX

Austin, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $30 one-way, to/from  Norfolk/Southern, VA

Birmingham, AL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Louisville, KY
 $30 one-way, to/from  Nashville, TN
 $30 one-way, to/from  New Orleans, LA

Boise, ID
 $30 one-way, to/from  Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $30 one-way, to/from  Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Burbank, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Las Vegas, NV
 $30 one-way, to/from  Oakland, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Phoenix, AZ
 $30 one-way, to/from  San Jose, CA

Cleveland, OH
 $30 one-way, to/from  Nashville, TN

Columbus, OH
 $30 one-way, to/from  St. Louis, MO

Corpus Christi, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Houston Hobby, TX

Dallas Love Field, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Amarillo, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Houston Hobby, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Lubbock, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Midland/Odessa, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  New Orleans, LA
 $30 one-way, to/from  San Antonio, TX

El Paso, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Albuquerque, NM
 $30 one-way, to/from  Lubbock, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Midland/Odessa, TX

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Jacksonville, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Orlando, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Tampa Bay, FL

Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Austin, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Houston Hobby, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  San Antonio, TX

Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Dallas Love Field, TX

Houston Hobby, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Corpus Christi, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Dallas Love Field, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Jackson, MS

Indianapolis, IN
 $30 one-way, to/from  St. Louis, MO

Jackson, MS
 $30 one-way, to/from  Houston Hobby, TX

Jacksonville, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Tampa Bay, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  West Palm Beach, FL

Kansas City, MO
 $30 one-way, to/from  Nashville, TN
 $30 one-way, to/from  Oklahoma City, OK
 $30 one-way, to/from  St. Louis, MO
 $30 one-way, to/from  Tulsa, OK

Las Vegas, NV
 $30 one-way, to/from  Burbank, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Los Angeles, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $30 one-way, to/from  St. Louis, MO

Los Angeles, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Las Vegas, NV
 $30 one-way, to/from  Sacramento, CA

Louisville, KY
 $30 one-way, to/from  Birmingham, AL
 $30 one-way, to/from  St. Louis, MO

Lubbock, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Albuquerque, NM
 $30 one-way, to/from  Dallas Love Field, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  El Paso, TX

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Albuquerque, NM
 $30 one-way, to/from  Dallas Love Field, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  El Paso, TX

Nashville, TN
 $30 one-way, to/from  Birmingham, AL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Cleveland, OH
 $30 one-way, to/from  Kansas City, MO
 $30 one-way, to/from  New Orleans, LA

New Orleans, LA - Featured Destination
 $30 one-way, to/from  Birmingham, AL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Dallas Love Field, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Nashville, TN

Norfolk/Southern, VA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD

Oakland, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Burbank, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Ontario, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Reno/Tahoe, NV

Oklahoma City, OK
 $30 one-way, to/from  Kansas City, MO

Omaha, NE
 $30 one-way, to/from  St. Louis, MO

Ontario, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Oakland, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Sacramento, CA

Orlando, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL

Phoenix, AZ
 $30 one-way, to/from  Albuquerque, NM
 $30 one-way, to/from  Burbank, CA

Portland, OR
 $30 one-way, to/from  Sacramento, CA

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $30 one-way, to/from  Boise, ID
 $30 one-way, to/from  Oakland, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Salt Lake City, UT
 $30 one-way, to/from  San Jose, CA

Sacramento, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Los Angeles, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Ontario, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Portland, OR

Salt Lake City, UT
 $30 one-way, to/from  Reno/Tahoe, NV

San Antonio, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Dallas Love Field, TX
 $30 one-way, to/from  Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX

San Jose, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Burbank, CA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Reno/Tahoe, NV

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $30 one-way, to/from  Boise, ID

St. Louis, MO
 $30 one-way, to/from  Columbus, OH
 $30 one-way, to/from  Indianapolis, IN
 $30 one-way, to/from  Kansas City, MO
 $30 one-way, to/from  Little Rock, AR
 $30 one-way, to/from  Louisville, KY
 $30 one-way, to/from  Omaha, NE
 $30 one-way, to/from  Tulsa, OK

Tampa Bay, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Jacksonville, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  West Palm Beach, FL

Tucson, AZ
 $30 one-way, to/from  Albuquerque, NM

Tulsa, OK
 $30 one-way, to/from  Kansas City, MO
 $30 one-way, to/from  St. Louis, MO

West Palm Beach, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Jacksonville, FL
 $30 one-way, to/from  Tampa Bay, FL

Details on Anniversary Specials:

*Available only on southwest.com.
*7-day advance purchase required.
*Available on published, scheduled service.
*Travel any day of the week
*Fares shown are one-way and do not include federal
 excise tax of up to $3.00 for each flight segment.
 (a segment is defined as a takeoff and landing)
*Fares do not include airport-assessed passenger
 facility charges (PFC) of up to $9 one-way.
*Fares are nonrefundable, but (except for tickets
 purchased through our Group Tickets Program)
 may be applied toward future travel on Southwest Airlines.
*Travel through end of schedule, except for
 November 20, 21, 25, and 26, December 21, 22,
 28-30, 2001, and January 1, 2002.
*Purchase through October 18, 2001,  midnight Pacific Time.
*Fares are available one-way or can be combined
 with other fare types.  Most restrictive rules of combined
 fares will apply.
*Penalty applies to any changes made after purchasing
 Southwest Internet Specials.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml?src=1016

****************southwest.com Featured Destination**********

This week's Featured Destination: New Orleans, LA

Brought to you by New Orleans Convention and Visitors
Bureau.

This week features air fare specials plus great deals on
hotels.  For information on this destination, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/dest_index.shtml?src=1016

************** Additional Information section ***************

Additional information you need to know about all of our
air fare specials:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel may be purchased online using
 either a credit card or by utilizing funds from a
 previously unused or cancelled Ticketless
 Travel reservation(s).  Funds from up to four cancelled
 or unused Ticketless Travel reservation records can
 be combined to purchase a new Ticketless Travel
 reservation record.  Southwest Airlines travel credit
 (e.g., travel voucher, gift certificate, discount coupon)
 may not be used as forms of payment for
 Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.
*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods such as Thanksgiving,
 Christmas, and New Years.
*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

********* Southwest Airlines' Vacations Specials **********

Southwest Airlines Vacations is now offering savings on
complete Las Vegas vacation packages when you
purchase by Oct. 31, 2001, for travel November 1, 2001
through January 11, 2002, and stay at a participating hotel.
For Las Vegas vacation information, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/hotfares_other.html?src=1016

****************** Subscriber Information *********************
Please pass this great news on to your friends.
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines
Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save E-mail Updates.
Please visit our subscription page to change your
e-mail address or to unsubscribe at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/emailUnsubscribe.html

******************************************************************
You may retrieve and print a copy of your Southwest
Airlines Ticketless Travel at:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/retrieveItinerary.html

Questions about your flight arrival or departure time?
Please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/flifo/
******************************************************************
This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2001 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: sscott5@enron.com
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email/


Start Date: 2/4/02; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020406.txt


We will need to establish a deadline.  Will Friday March 10th work?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000 05:14
PM ---------------------------

Kim Melodick
02/18/2000 05:34 PM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen P
Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvonne
Laing/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOPS salary survey questionnaire

Attached you will find the salary survey questionnaire for your review.  You
will need to fill out the questionnaire for each exempt job group in your
department.  Please be as specific as possible to ensure we are capturing all
the skills needed to accurately price the job.  If you have filled out the
questionnaire in the past, you may want to update the information.  I will be
happy to address any questions you have regarding the form.


Kim,
With the support and cooperation of Vince Kaminski and his group, I have been putting together a written piece about the Research Group within Enron.  The focus is on group members' experiences and learning from working in its strongly collegial, creative work environment.
I want to include in the writing, the clients' perspective regarding the value and effectiveness of the groups' services.  Vince and Krishna suggested your name.   I respect confidentiality in this work:  As with the others, you will have given approval to anything I use from your interview.
Would you be willing to talk very briefly by phone with me this week?  If so, please suggest a time when I could call.
Thank you,
Ann Thomas
(713) 871-8345


Hi there,

I am meeting with Ben tomorrow to discuss NWestern.  I'm fairly confident
that he will be willing to extend the letter agreement, but he hasn't called
me back today to confirm.

Ms. Kahn and I have exchanged voice mail.  Could one of you return her call
for me?  I'm tied up.  You might get an idea on some times tomorrow for a
call.  I'm booked until around 130 for anything which would last more than a
few minutes.  I'll check with Ben.

Thank you,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
10:43 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
03/29/2001 10:34 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Carole Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Aquila Canada Corp. deals in Houston books

Hi guys,

I've just come across a few deals that are in TAGG as settling between
ENA and Aquila Canada Corp.  These deals would not have shown up when
you looked for deals to flip to the FT-US/CAND-ERMS book as they aren't in
TAGG as ECC deals.  I have a feeling that there are lots of deals like this in
TAGG, but I just don't know where. We are having problems printing TAGG
tickets
up here, so I'm not able to see which books these deals are in right now.
What I'm
requesting is that you go through all your books and look for all deals with
Aquila
Canada Corp. that are to settle for March and April 2001, and after, and flip
these
deals into the FT-US/CAND-ERMS book as soon as possible.  As it stands,
I'm missing at least 10 deals from the April 2001 Nymex invoice, and I want to
make sure that these deals don't get invoiced by someone in Houston
settlements.
Nymex settled yesterday for April, so invoicing for these deals is taking
place
today.

I understand that you are all very busy right now, but it would really be
appreciated
if this was dealt with as soon as possible today.  The settlements group and
I need
to get our invoices sent out today, so we need these deals to be fixed right
away.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this matter, and let me know
if I
can assist you in any way.

Thanks so much for your help
Stacey-


This FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2000 (5:00 p.m. CST) is the deadline for deferral
program enrollment.  Following the deadline, no new elections or changes to
existing elections will be accepted.
To learn more about your deferral program opportunities and to enroll for
2001 deferrals, access eHRonline at http://ehronline.enron.com.  (Call the
ISC Help Desk at 713-345-4727 if you need your ID or password to access the
system.)

1. Review the program descriptions (attached to the Election Form) before you
make your elections.
2. If you decide to defer compensation, complete the Election Form before
Friday, December 8,  2000, 5:00 p.m. CST (the enrollment deadline).
3. Print your 2001 Election Form and Confirmation Statement right from the
web site and you,re   finished!

DEFERRAL ENROLLMENT 2001--ADDED VALUE FOR YOUR FUTURE


That's so cool that your sister finally came up!  What did she think of
Portland in general?  How are her and Jay doing?
I've been pretty good.  Keeping busy with work, babysitting, what not.  I'm
house sitting for my boss David Ho this whole week and watching his 7 year
old son Zack.  I take Zack to school in the mornings and pick him up after
work and then we just hang for the rest of the evening.  He's really a cool
kid.  Very disciplined.  But I don't think he gets much attention from his
parents and I don't think they let him be a kid very much.  So I've been
spoiling him.  We go out to dinner and I let him order whatever he wants.  I
tought him how to play poker last night and we made brownies and he acted as
if it was the coolest, most exciting thing he's ever done.  He kept saying,
"We're having fun!  This is FUN!"  As if having fun and being a kid was some
weird concept.  Tonight we're going to a baseball game and he's stoked about
that cause his parents don't let him play sports.  I took him to my
apartment yesterday and he asked my why I lived in a "hotel".  I should have
told him, "Cause your Daddy doesn't pay me enough," but I guess that would
have been bad.
Jesse's band played this last weekend at the Old Market Pub.  Mom and Kurt
came and my Dad came too.  My Dad ran the sound board and he was so stoked!
He was so excited that Jesse wanted to involve him like that.  Mom & Kurt
just got back from visiting my sister in Amsterdam.  They took a road trip
to Paris and my Mom broke her foot while they were there so they had to see
Paris from the car. She's wearing a huge, purple cast.  But she's ok.  She's
got a little cast shoe so that she can walk on it without crutches.  We got
all fucked up when the band played and she was dancing all night on it.
I guess that's it.  Looking forward to the nice weather.  I love Portland in
the Spring and Summer, it puts me in the best mood!  Going down to LA in
July for business.  If you happen to be there by chance, we'll have to
party.  Don't worry, no Kristen!!!
Are things going well with you?  How's work?  How's life in general?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:21 PM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: Re: hi!

Hey, sorry I didn't write you back sooner however I had a six day break.
Anyway,  ST Pattys day was a blast, Dahl and Pat and I started drinking
around 10am and by the time the night was over we had been to 10 different
bars, (got kicked out of two)  met up with a ton of people and had an
overall blast.  I was so hating it the next day.   My sister was up from LA
this weekend.  We had a really good time.  Went to Touche and the Gypsy on
Thursday, went to the Blazer game and then Scooters.  On Saturday night we
went to the Kennedy School, and on Sunday we went to Multnomah Falls and
took her to Beaches for lunch.  She had a really good time and it was nice
to have her up for the weekend.  Anyway, how is everything with you?


Prebon just sent over a confirm where Mike Swerzbin:
buys from EES 25 mw of Q2'01 Palo off-peak at $124.95.

Is this a good deal because they did not tell me about it?


Please see attached memo for this evening's conference call.  (5:00 PM CST)


Here's a simple first draft.  I didn't know how much detail we should get into.

Ramona, am I using the correct terminology?  They are not going to confirm in Cycle 1.  They are just going to let us fill-in where El Paso filled-up all the capacity downstream.

Let me know your comments.

Thanks!


The ClickAtHome Database shows that you have placed an order with Dell
Computer with an order number of 537808172. Please read below for
instructions:

1.  If this is correct, enjoy your computer!
    You can check your order status by clicking here:
      http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp

      ** For questions about your order/changes/problems,
         call 1-866-220-3355 **

2.  If you did NOT place an order with Dell for the ClickAtHome program,
    please email enron@avenueb2e.com or call 713-895-9087 to report
    the incorrect order on your behalf.

Thank you!

ClickAtHome Team!


in the attempt to delete the millions of emails i've received from Telecom
Reports, i deleted your Western Gov update before reading it.  could you
resend?

your pal,
jeff


Gary has told me that he would like to bid:
Kyle Brady $11
Dedric Ward $6
James Allen $21


Steve, we're providing this information to you for the upcoming Board meeting
per Mark's request.  Let me know if you need anything else.

Internal Communications Metrics:
eSpeak
Average live event participation ranges from 30 participants to more than
1,200
Transcript readership after the live event can reach more than 1,000

eMeet
Average daily visits have increased 138% since stats were first captured in
April 2000
More than 7,321 employees have visited the site

ThinkBank
More than 3,500 employees have visited the site since the launch in November
2000
92 business ideas are currently in the Idea Vault

eThink Merchandise
Before we even announced the online store in December 2000, we sold 90 screen
sweeps, 49 badges and 16 apparel items and recouped $122.13 (only apparel is
marked up -- 20%)

eBiz
Our average employee readership for 2000 was 1,529 users and our average for
2001 so far is 4,343 users
On our last issue of eBiz, we had 27,187 hits and 5,297 unique users

ETV
On average, we are running 50 segments of Enron content per week airing twice
a day
In January, there were 20 new segments created of Enron content and, so far
in February, there have already been 19 requests submitted

Enron Business
The average weekly readership of the online version has increased by 73%
since 1999
We continue to receive many requests for additional copies of the print
version for marketing purposes, etc.

In a survey ,the Enron Internal Communications team conducted in 1999:

How do you generally read Enron Business (EB)?
67% print
8% online
25% both

Do you ever share EB with your spouse or family?
70% yes
30% no

In a survey we conducted in 2000:

How do you generally read EB?
67% read print
69% read online
36% read both

The number of respondents in the 1999 readership survey was 115.  The number
of respondents in 2000 was 6,035.

Recent Enron Accolades:
Fortune's America's Most Admired Companies:
Most Innovative for sixth consecutive year (Published)
Ranked No. 18 overall among 535 companies, up from No. 36 last year (Popular
Vote - Not published)
Ranked No. 4 overall among 535 companies, down from No. 1 last year (Total
rating of 8.29 in all eight attributes - Not published.  No. 1 Citigroup; No.
2 Omnicom; No. 3 UPS)
Ranking in seven other attributes:
 - Quality of Management No. 2 (We were No. 1 last year; Omnicom No. 1 this
year)
 - Quality of Products/Services No. 5
 - Long-term investment value No. 13
 - Financial soundness  No. 70
 - Employee talent  No. 4
 - Social responsibility  No. 12
` - Use of corporate assets No. 15
Overall industry results   No. 1
 (This year we're in the pipeline/energy industry, expanded from just
pipelines last year)

Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work for in America:
Enron ranked No. 22, up from No. 24 last year


Michelle, please note that among several files that I have had delivered to
you upon my departure from Enron, please refer to the file on Cynthia
Sandherr.  It contains documentation from conversations and specific
situations that ocurred during my 3+ years as HR Rep for Govt Affairs.  As
the data is very sensitive and confidential, please let Constance if you have
not received it.

I have now cleared all my emails and have no more hard copies to pass along.
Feel free to call me, even when I get to Dynegy should you have any
questions!  Constance has all my contact information.  After tonight my
access will be disconnected to the system.  My personal email address is:
pettewayg@excite.com.

Take care.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron on
10/01/2000 11:23 PM ---------------------------

Gwendolyn Petteway
05/23/2000 03:37 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Follow-up

Steve is traveling (abroad) until Friday, 5/26.  Unfortunately I will not be
able to provide him my data until Friday afternoon.  Sorry for the delay.
Please contact me as I have further clarification from Compensation regarding
stock options.
---------------------- Forwarded by Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron on
10/01/2000 11:23 PM ---------------------------

Gwendolyn Petteway
06/02/2000 02:38 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Constance Charles/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Follow-up

Cynthia, I apologize for the delay.  I will ask Constance to arrange for a
conference call for Monday, June 5.

	From:  Cynthia Sandherr                           06/02/2000 01:41 PM

To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Follow-up

Cindy:  As you recall, Steve Kean, Gwen Petteway, you and I met in Houston on
May 15th to discuss my job at Enron.  It was my understanding that I would
receive some response from the company within a week or so after our
meeting.  Gwen has updated me as to the reasons for the response delay due to
key executives being on vacation, but regardless I was led to believe I would
have heard some response around May 24th.  I am getting concerned and would
like to know the company's position.

In addition, the Performance Review Process has begun for my group and is to
conclude by June 14th.  I have spoken to Gwen as to my concerns as to whether
I should participate in this review process.  Although I did not select them
to review me, both Steve Kean and Rick Shapiro have informed by boss, Joe
Hillings, or their intentions to review me.  Given the concerns raised by me
about them during our meeting and concerns expressed to others about them on
previous occasions,  I have grave reservations as to their ability to provide
an objective review of my performance.

I welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you further.  My number is
202-466-9143.  Many thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron on
10/01/2000 11:23 PM ---------------------------

Gwendolyn Petteway
06/20/2000 08:19 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Conference Call

Are you available to talk with me either Thursday (6/22) or Friday a.m (6/23)?
---------------------- Forwarded by Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron on
10/01/2000 11:23 PM ---------------------------

Gwendolyn Petteway
06/27/2000 02:24 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Career Advancement

Hi Cynthia.  Can you give me idea as to when the House and Senate mark-ups of
the electricity bill take place?  I am trying to determine the timeframe in
which you want to respond to Steve.

	From:  Cynthia Sandherr                           06/22/2000 05:51 PM

To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jocelyne@pdi-corp.com

Subject: Career Advancement

Dear Cindy:

 It occurred to me that I should share some addition thoughts and concerns
with you regarding my situation.

 First and foremost, as I tried to make clear during our recent meeting with
Steve Kean, it is my desire to stay with the company.  I have invested over
10 years with Enron and feel that I have made substantial contributions to
its success.  However, I continue to be frustrated over the fact that I have
been demoted and that  there has been no response to or acknowledgement of my
application for Joe Hillings' position.  If I am, in fact , not going to be
considered for the position, I believe I am owed the courtesy of knowing that.

 I would also argue that I have made significant progress in addressing the
"communication issues" that have of recent concern to Steve.  I have had a
number of productive sessions with Jocelyne Gessner, Ph.D. of Personnel
Decisions International on successful executive relations and management, and
she informs me that, in her view, my "deficiencies" as perceived by Steve in
that area may have been overstated.  Dr. Gessner has made numerous attempts
to call Steve to discuss my progress in a tripartite conversation and he has
not been responsive.  While I recognize that Steve is extremely busy, it
seems to me that if he, as he stated during our meeting, really wants me to
stay with the company, he would make it a point to determine if the issues of
his concern were being addressed.  If he is not interested in garnering
feedback about my sessions, one could reasonably conclude that the perceived
"communications problem" is merely a pretext.

 It also continues to concern me that the restructuring of the Washington
office has been done without any written changes to my job description.  Many
people within Enron with whom I have had a long-standing relationship
continue to ask me for lobbying assistance on various issues because they
have been satisfied with the results that I have obtained for them in the
past.  Because some of those issues are now not my primary or secondary area
of responsibility,  per the new organizational chart, I have been compelled
to refer those inquiries and requests to others.  In doing so, I fear that
this could create a misperception that I am unwilling to provide customer
service to others in the company.  I am sure that you would agree this could,
in the long run, hurt my chances for increased compensation and advancement.

 The present legislative activity on a number of high-profile Enron
legislative issues, including the company's top priority of electricity
restructuring, has precluded me from formally responding to Steve's
separation offer.  While I recognize that it was made in good faith and that
it provides a basis for further discussions, I would like to respond after
the House and Senate mark-ups of the electricity bill take place.

 In the meantime, I would welcome any guidance or suggestions that you might
have, and I greatly appreciate your interest in my situation.

     Cynthia

---------------------- Forwarded by Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron on
10/01/2000 11:23 PM ---------------------------

Gwendolyn Petteway
07/12/2000 04:41 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Follow-up

I received your voicemail and have communicated to Steve Kean that you will
respond to us the 3rd or 4th week in this month (July).  Call me when you get
a chance.
---------------------- Forwarded by Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron on
10/01/2000 11:23 PM ---------------------------

Gwendolyn Petteway
09/05/2000 01:54 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Cynthia Sandherr

I spoke to Cynthia last week and I would like to pass along her comments.
Are you available to meet this week?  If not, I will put the comments in a
confidential email to you.  Thanks.

Sorry I missed you and Mrs, Kean at Charlene's Housewarming.  I arrived
around 9:45pm.
---------------------- Forwarded by Gwendolyn Petteway/HR/Corp/Enron on
10/01/2000 11:23 PM ---------------------------

Gwendolyn Petteway
09/08/2000 08:32 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Follow-up with Steve Kean

Cynthia,

Steve and I met earlier today.  Call me next week when you get the
opportunity.  Talk to you soon.


I can make a good case for $3.5 to $7 MM but it depends on how receptive the ANS producers are to the commercial proposal.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McCarty, Danny
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 10:56 AM
To:	Gadd, Eric
Subject:	RE: ANNGTC

Eric,
    Do you have any ballpark idea about where an offer might come in?

Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gadd, Eric
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 10:00 AM
To:	Pryor, Tony; Wilkie, Kim
Cc:	Hill, Robert; McCarty, Danny
Subject:	ANNGTC

Tony + Kim,

Several of the rejoining partners of ANNGTC have contacted me asking if Enron is interested in selling its residual claims.  The answer is most definitely affirmative.  Please advise on the following-

What are the bankruptcy court's requirements to undertake a mandated auction?
Is it possible through the bankruptcy court to extinguish liability claims arising prior to NAGC's withdrawal from the ANNGTC partnership?  If so, how?

Here's how I would like to proceed-
Prepare an offering letter that identifies what we are selling and preferred terms + conditions
Distribute to each partner, possibly other interested parties (ANS producers)
Obtain bids and evaluate best offer

I would like to begin the sales process asap and would appreciate your feedback most urgently.


Thanks babe. You are so sweet. I love being with you every day. That is why it is so hard for me when we go a week without being together (real close, that is). I will miss you too. Every time I think of you I will remember the ham (since you don't like them). Talk to you soon.

Love,
	Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Harris, Steven
Subject:

It has been great to spend time with you.  I am really going to miss you this week.  I need a kiss before I leave.
Don't forget to order your ham.

Love you.


<http://isc.dev.corp.enron.com/surveyVPN/images/index_r1_c1_r1_c1.gif>
Now that you have access to the following applications without requiring VPN access...

Outlook Web Access (email and calendar)

PEP

XMS (Expense Reporting application)

And, COMING SOON...
eHROnline (year-end)
Benefits Election (Oct. 29, 2001)
Electronic Pay Stubs (year-end), and
Much More,

through the ClickAtHome Portal and the Internet, do you still believe you need remote access through VPN from home to Enron networks (must have a valid business reason with supervisor approval and a monthly cost)?

 YES NO NOT SURE
Please answer this survey from your computer at work, not via Outlook Web Access.


Daily-Blessing
http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch4.htm

Prayer and the Atheist
http://www.daily-blessings.com/humor58.htm

win a digital camera, $4500.00 or MORE
http://www.daily-blessings.com/4500.htm

Are you working on crafts or gifts for Christmas?  One of my favorite offline
stores for craft and homemade gift supplies is JoAnn's.  And now they offer
an online store that I can shop right from home!!  And they have a great
promotional offer that you should definitely take advantage of...check it out
at the link below

http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjjoann.htm

Are you looking for a gift for someone who has everything?  or at least a
cell phone?  Did you know that cell phones give off harmful radiation?  These
folks offer a way to make your mobile phone safer to use.  Buy one for
yourself...and put them on your list for a gift this gift giving season!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjcellphones.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


What do you mean, and me?  I just went off on me...

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 2:18 PM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE: hi!

Things are good.  I have been very busy.  Work is going really well.  Other
than that not much really.  And you.


fyi, rick
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leach, Doug
Sent:	Thursday, March 01, 2001 12:42 PM
To:	Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Cc:	Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ENRON; De La Roche, Marc; Dhruv, Tushar; Nowlan, John
Subject:	FEB A/R

---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 12:39 PM ---------------------------
From:	James N Lessor/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/01/2001 12:38 PM
To:	Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	FEB A/R

SEE ATT....


logoInfoBeat: Don't miss a beat!
	Daily Dose
	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	InfoBeat HomeUser Profile

	[IMAGE]
	DATE
	[IMAGE]
	Friday, December 01, 2000
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	InfoBeat Fun - Daily Dose - 12/01/2000

	 Cool Site of the Day
	Fact of the Day
	Joke of the Day
	Quote of the Day
	Born Today

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	Click on Ad -- Support InfoBeat's Free Services

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Cool Site of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	You wanna get smart? Well stop talking into your shoe and log onto the Weekly
Dose of Architecture. This is a great looking, easy to comprehend site that
will certify you as an architecture buff in a very short while. New images
are uploaded each Monday with some brief text to go along with them, and the
old stuff gets archived so you can catch up in your free time. Most of the
work here is contemporary so if you're looking for anything else, simply
click on "links" to explore. Architecture has never been so easy!
http://www.internettrash.com/users/archidose/main.html

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Fact of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	Many believe the potato chip was born in 1853 in a restaurant in Saratoga
Springs, N.Y. when a picky customer complained about the thickness of his
fried potatoes. When the potatoes were returned to wise guy cook, George Crum
he sliced some potatoes as thinly as possible, fried them and sent them back
to the customer. To his surprise the man loved them. For more, click here.

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Joke of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	The Long Hack Veil
	Jennifer visited a psychic of some local repute.

	In a dark and hazy room, peering into a crystal ball, the mystic delivered
grave news:

	"There's no easy way to say this, so I'll just be blunt - prepare yourself to
be a widow. Your husband will die a violent and horrible death this year."

	Visibly shaken, Jennifer stared at the woman's lined face, then at the single
flickering candle, then down at her hands. She took a few deep breaths to
compose herself.

	She simply had to know. She met the fortune teller's gaze, steadied her
voice, and asked:

	"Will I be acquitted?"

	For more jokes, click Joke-Of-The-Day.com

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Quote of the Day
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	Thought For Today: "A man cannot be too careful in the choice of his
enemies." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900).

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]Born Today
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	- Former CIA director Stansfield Turner is 77.
	- Actor Robert Symonds is 74.
	- Singer Billy Paul is 66.
	- Actor-comedian-director Woody Allen is 65.
	- Singer Lou Rawls is 65.
	- Golfer Lee Trevino is 61.
	- Singer Dianne Lennon (Lennon Sisters) is 61.
	- Comedian-actor Richard Pryor is 60.
	- Country musician Casey Van Beek (Tractors) is 58.
	- Rock singer-musician Eric Bloom (Blue Oyster Cult) is 56.
	- Rock musician John Densmore (Doors) is 56.
	- Actress-singer Bette Midler is 55.
	- Singer Gilbert O'Sullivan is 54.
	- Actor Treat Williams is 49.
	- Country singer Kim Richey is 44.
	- Actress Charlene Tilton is 42.
	- Actress-model Carol Alt is 40.
	- Actor Jeremy Northam is 39.
	- Actor Nestor Carbonell is 33.
	- Actor Ron Melendez is 28.
	- Gospel singer Sarah Masen is 25.
	- Actress Ashley Monique Clark is 12.

	Source: Associated Press

	[IMAGE]

	back to top

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	Click on Ad -- Support InfoBeat's Free Services

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	You are subscribed with e-mail address: [judy.hernandez@enron.com]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	InfoBeat Home | User Profile | Unsubscribe
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	entertainment | finance | fun | news | snow reports | sports | weather

	(C) 2000 indimi, inc. All rights reserved.
	InfoBeat is a registered tradmark of indimi, inc. InfoBeat services are
	for personal use only. Commercial use or redistribution in any
	form, printed or electronic, is prohibited.

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]


Hey Sugar Bear!

I was just thinking about you and was hoping that everything is going okay
for you.  I constantly keep you in prayer regarding your situation.   How's
Erika doing?

You missed church Sunday when they forceably removed one of the guys (aaron
Burr) from the church.  You remember he was the one that used to sit on the
front row and get happy alllllllllll the time.  You remember him, anyway they
hauled his tail out of there.  It was terrible to see someone hauled from the
church, not matter what the situation is.

Oh well, take care, and call me if we need to talk!!!!


PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU ARE COMPLETELY PACKED BY 3:00 PM.  THE MOVE TEAM WILL BE ON THE FLOOR BY 3:00 PM.

ALSO:

1. EMPTY VOICEMAIL
2. TAKE HOME LAPTOPS AND PALM PILOTS, IPAQ'S OR BLACKBERRY'S
3. TO BE HERE AT LEAST ONE HOUR PRIOR TO YOUR NORMAL TIME ON MONDAY MORNING.  THE FLOOR WILL BE OPEN BY 5:00 AM
4.  PACK HEADSETS. (BOX,  BLACK WIRE TO EARPIECE AND BLACK CORD THAT CONNECTS UNDER DESK) ONLY LEAVE GRAY WIRES

LET ME KNOW IF THERE IS ANY QUESTIONS  OR IF YOU NEED ANY HELP
Ina Rangel
Administrative Coordinator
Enron North America
713-853-7257 Voice
713-646-3604 Fax


Dan, Please prepare amendment.  This new pricing overrides all the amendments
you have worked on in the
last month.

O'Neal, please change pricing in system.  This pricing overrides the pricing
I gave you a month ago.

Paul, please review San Jac. contract and new pricing spreadsheet and we will
meet when you are ready.

Thanks everyone!

New Pricing begins in August 2000.
See worksheet "Pricing  HL&P".  Also, sheet 3 has actual swaps with swap
values.


Following our meeting Friday, we propose to make the following assumptions
for resubscription of capacity rolling-off in 2001 (Steve, please let us know
if you would like to change any of these numbers):

     Assumption Current or Extension
Plan Capacity  Months  Rate  Rate &/or Volume

EOT to WOT 20,000 Feb-Dec $.15  (KN @ $.1310)
EOT to WOT 70,000 Nov-Dec $.15  (Agave @ $.14)
EOT to WOT 8,000 Apr-Dec $.15  (APS @ $.1520)

BL to TH 20,000 Dec  max  (Valero BL to TH @ max*)

EOT to EOT 10,000 Mar-Dec $.025  (Duke - Atoka @ $.02)
EOT to EOT 30,000 Apr-Dec $.035  (Continental 15,000 @ $.07)
EOT to EOT 25,000 Oct-Dec ??  (PNM @ $.11 - decide assumption by Wed)
EOT to EOT 400,000 Nov-Dec $.0075  (USGT @ $.0075)
EOT to EOT 40,000 Nov-Dec $.07  (Agave @ $.06)
EOT to EOT 20,000 Dec  $.02  (Valero TH to EOT @ max*)

IG to BL 18,000  Jan-Dec $.04  (Duke 18,000 @ $.03)
IG to BL 4,000  Feb-Dec $.04  (Vastar @ $.06)
IG to BL 15,000  Dec  $.04  (BRT @ $.05)

S. IG to BL 120,200 Jan-Dec $.02  (Red Cedar I/C:  Southern @ $.02, Red Cedar
@ $.02)
S. IG to BL 32,800 Jan-Dec $.02  (La Maquina I/C)
S. IG to BL 26,000 Feb-Dec $.02  (Red Cedar I/C:  Vastar @ $.06)

We're assuming:
 Agave will extend their contract for 1 or 2 years.  Assumed extension rates.
 PNM will extend their contract, but probably at a higher volume and lower
rate.
 Amoco will not reduce their MAXDTQ (6,500 IG to WOT, 3,500 BL to WOT).  Rates
  range from $.175 to $.205.


Sounds good to me.  Make me a plate, remember I have a 9 basketball game, so
I will be home about 10:30.
PL


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tran, Agatha
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 11:49 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Subject:	RE: 2002 plan - meeting with Jim Hughes

 this is the latest.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Monday, September 10, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Tran, Agatha; Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Subject:	RE: 2002 plan - meeting with Jim Hughes

Please let me know if there are any changes.

Jeff: Do you think Jim would mind if I sat in on some of these?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tran, Agatha
Sent:	Friday, September 07, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Lundstrom, Bruce; Norris, Michael; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Mahan, Mariella; Gilchrist, Scott; Callahan, Timothy; Fischer, Luitgard; Weidler, Peter E; Gonzalez, Orlando; Soares, Britaldo; Hunt, Christopher B.; Cline, Wade
Cc:	Berger, Peter; Boe, Larry A. (Lawrence); McCann, Steven K.; Rangel, Rafael; Yao, Anne S.; Howes, Carol; Brelsford, Loretta; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	2002 plan - meeting with Jim Hughes

Just a reminder.  Here is the final calendar ( as of today, of course)
 << File: calendar - meeting with Hughes3.xls >>


This is an update of the Email below.  With respect to DOE efforts to draft
electricity legislation, a list of potential items for the bill are being
discussed this afternoon with Secretary Abraham.  DOE hopes to have a draft
bill submitted to the White House by Friday, June 15, for consideration by
the VP Task Force.   Similar to efforts other private sector parties are
undoubtedly taking, I would like to submit to DOE our suggestions for the
legislation.  As mentioned below, this bill will not include open access, but
there are issues related to access which we may want to submit to DOE such as
how to deal with non-jurisdictional entities.  Other topics on which we may
want to submit legislative language are PUHCA (the reporting requirements),
interconnection, reliability, negawatts, RTO ownership issues, and eminent
domain.  DOE seem very willing to deal with the non-jurisdictional entities,
either in the rulemaking context or by legislation.  Tom Briggs will be
following up with appropriate folks on this project.   If you have any other
ideas for this effort, please let us know ASAP.

	Linda Robertson
	06/07/2001 12:03 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron, Pat
Shortridge/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: (bcc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron)
		 Subject: Administration Energy Plan:  Next Steps

(Please do not circulate or discuss the information on this Email outside the
parties listed here.)

Debate within the Administration on implementation of its energy plan appears
to be settled.  This debate was prolonged because of change in control of the
Senate.  The Administration has decided to transmit to Congress by mid-June a
comprehensive letter containing an inventory of energy plan recommendations
requiring legislative action.  I understand that legislative language will
not be transmitted in connection with this letter.  Soon after receipt of the
letter, the President will host a meeting at the White House of bipartisan
congressional leaders and some key committee chairs and ranking Members.  The
purpose of the meeting will be to convey to Congress the imperative of acting
quickly on the President's plan and it will serve as an official launch of
the legislative effort and the Administration's efforts to work with Congress
on the plan.

In the meantime, the Departments and Agencies are already drafting parts of
the energy plan.  For example, we have been told by DOE that they are
presently drafting an electric restructuring bill.   I have calls into DOE to
find out more about their efforts and the specific provisions to be included
in such legislation.  We have learned that "open access" will not be in this
legislation, as the President's report instructs FERC to undertake the
project.  Thus, the Administration continues to believe that legislation is
not needed for the core open access provisions and that this is a matter they
understand will be at the top of Pat Wood's agenda.  Among other items, one
question we will probe with DOE is whether the electricity legislation will
contain access provisions pertaining to entities presently outside FERC's
jurisdiction.

At present, it does not appear that the various provisions being drafted by
the agencies will be bundled into single transmission from the Administration
to the Hill.  Instead, the VP's task force intends to have these legislative
drafts ready to provide relevant committees at the appropriate time.  This
part of the implementation plan, of course, could change.

As for Pat Wood, we continue to receive confirmation from Hill and Executive
Branch sources that the White House intends to designate Mr. Wood as FERC
Chair.   Timing of the switch remains unclear.  Our latest information
suggests it could be September 1.  Many parties are suggesting to the White
House that the change should take place earlier than that date.

We have efforts underway to structure our position on a possible open access
rulemaking.  A few folks on this email will be talking with Dan Watkiss today
about such a proposal.


Barbara,

Yes, ECT does not exist any longer. It's safer to say
the seminar is sponsored buy Enron Corp. WE have a reorganization every
three months.

Vince

Barbara Ostdiek <ostdiek@rice.edu> on 01/27/2000 03:23:08 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: sponsorship

Vince:

I just realized that I am still saying that the seminar series is sponsored
by Enron Capital and Trade Resources.  Should I change that to Enron North
America?

Thanks.

bbo


Respond by January 10, 2002 and no later than 4:00 p.m.

Enron North America Corp. and  Enron Net Works LLC are circulating this Questionnaire to their directors and officers to develop and verify information that will be used in connection with the proposed sale of all the business of wholesale trading of natural gas and electricity with customers in North America. In a nutshell, we need to disclose any transactions between you and Enron Corp., Enron North America Corp. or Enron Net Works relating to the trading business since September 30, 1999.

We expect to be in position to sign the purchase documents upon completion of the auction scheduled for Thursday, January 10, 2002.  Unfortunately, that means we need your responses to the questionnaire as soon as possible, and in no event later than 4:00 p.m. of January 10, 2002.

Regards,

Mark E. Haedicke and Mark E. Taylor


Unsubscribe at  bottom[IMAGE]
 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]       Click  here to download RealArcade.    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Experience  the Internet's first personal game arcade!    [IMAGE]     Discover  the best games in every category and genre    [IMAGE]     Acquire  games easily and reliably    [IMAGE]       Play  games with greater ease and knowledge  [IMAGE]       Click  here to download RealArcade.
 remove  me                    privacy  policy       You are receiving this e-mail because you  downloaded RealPlayer(R) or RealJukebox(R) from Real.com(TM) and indicated  a preference to receive product news, updates, and special offers from  RealNetworks(R). If you do not wish to receive e-mails from us in the  future, click on the "remove me" link above.    RealPlayer(R), RealJukebox(R), Real.com(TM),  RealArcade(TM) and RealNetworks(R) are trademarks or registered trademarks  of RealNetworks, Inc. All other companies or products listed herein  are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.


Kyle,

We are presenting the Northern Border Stipulation at the Bankruptcy Transaction Review Committee, BTRC, this afternoon at 1 pm our time.  The Stipulation that has been negotiated contains the features and time flexibility that ECC will need to complete the settlements with Birchill and/or Tenaska, that capacity has been carved out for special handling.  It also means that the other remaining ENA capacity on NBPL will be rejected in two weeks.  That also means that ENA will give up any other rights to the remaining capacity and that about 5 days later NBPL will be posting the space to find new creditworthy shippers.

The approach that I want to use today is that the Northern Border Stipulation is what we are discussing today.  The Stipulation has the processes/flexibility incorporated the ECC needs to finis up your settlements.  Your settlements should be presented separately and discussed in more detail.  Could you guys be in position to talk to the BTRC on Tuesday?

Call me and we can discuss in more detail,
Ruth Concannon
ruth.concannon@enron.com
713-853-1667

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Concannon, Ruth
Sent:	Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:34 AM
To:	'michael.koss@us.pwcglobal.com'
Cc:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Garza, Maria; Germany, Chris; Barbe, Robin
Subject:	Northern Border Stipulation Cliff Notes

Michael  --  I recommend that you use the following as your Cliff Notes for the NBPL Stipulation:

Most of ENA's seven firm maximum rate transportation agreements with Northern Border Pipeline, NBPL, were used to ship gas purchased from Enron Canada, ECC, at the US/Canadian border to markets in the upper Midwest and Chicago.  The gas supply for these ECC and ENA agreements was created by upstream "producer netback" transactions that ECC arranged with various Canadian producers.  Producer netback transactions imbed the cost of transportation from the supply basin to the market area into the final price that the producer receives for its gas.  Before bankruptcy, ECC's firm transportation on NOVA and Foothills and ENA's firm transportation costs on NBPL were ultimately paid by the netback producers.

The remaining ENA firm maximum rate transportation contract with Northern Border was entered into when the spread between the NNG-Ventura and an adjusted NGPL-Midcontinent indices allowed ENA to financially hedge the cost of the transport between the receipt and delivery points. These hedges are no longer in place and the spot market prices do not support keeping the contract for the Estate.

ECC is not in Chapter 11, however, most if not all of the producers involved with these producer netback transactions have the right to terminate under their agreements with ECC under certain defaulting events that ECC has indicated have occurred in the current operating scenario.  Since there has been no gas sales to ECC, and no sales from ECC to ENA at the border, ENA's transportation on NBPL has not been used since the petition date.  ENA's current reservation charges on NBPL are over $605,000 per month.

During ECC's settlement process with the NOVA/Foothills/NBPL netback producers, only one producer, Birchill, has indicated a willingness to acquire the NOVA/Foothills/NBPL transportation capacity related to its original deal.  ENA's Northern Border Stipulation has incorporated the flexibility and features needed to have this capacity permanently released back to Birchill when the settlement is executed by the parties.

The Stipulation also contains ENA's recommendation that the remaining ENA contracts and capacity be rejected since the producer netback deals are dead and the financial hedges that ENA used to justify holding the transportation capacity are no longer in place.

Producer Netback Deal Structure

Netback Producers sell gas to ECC in the Alberta Province
ECC has firm transportation on Canadian pipelines  --  NOVA and Foothills  (Note:  US and Canadian Transportation Costs are deducted from Producer's Price)
ECC ships gas to the US Border and sells gas to ENA at a pass through price
ENA has firm transportation on US pipeline  --  NBPL  (Note:  US Transportation Costs are deducted from ECC's Price)
ENA ships gas on NBPL from the Canadian border to US markets and sells at US market area index prices

Call me and we can discuss,

Ruth
713-853-1667


Louise,

Carlos has informed me that he has been told he will likely be laid off.

You may wish to consider intervening to keep him:

- If the new purchaser is interested in the TexMex concept, Carlos is the most important Mexican link. He has great relationships, has negotiated MOU's and is close to contract with multiple customers.

- If we desire to retain EnronOnline expertise, Carlos has it.

- He is still on the US payroll and has an Enron working visa.

Dave


---------------------- Forwarded by Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000
01:33 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Michelle Vitrella                           11/13/2000 12:18 PM

To: Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Renee
Ingram/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea Hauser/NA/Enron@Enron,
Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyndi Alvarado/NA/Enron@Enron, Betty J
Coneway/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Newsletter Deadline

FYI...
The deadline for the upcoming newsletter, Business Highlights, is 1 pm,
Wednesday, November 15.  Please respond to this email if your group is not
going to provide a highlight for this week.

Don't forget, if your group needs help turning bullet points into Highlight
paragraphs, Kathie Grabstald can help.

Thank you,
Michelle Vitrella

PS..  We are also looking for quotes for the "Nuggets & Notes" piece


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 01:46 PM -----

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	02/28/2001 11:00 AM

		 To: Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com>, Mike Day <MDay@GMSSR.com>, Bev
Hansen <bhansen@lhom.com>, Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>, Susan J Mara
<smara@enron.com>, Joseph Alamo <JAlamo@enron.com>, Paul Kaufman
<paul.kaufman@enron.com>, Michael McDonald <Michael.McDonald@enron.com>,
David Parquet <David.Parquet@enron.com>, Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@enron.com>, Marcie Milner <mmilner@enron.com>, Sandra McCubbin
<Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com>, Tim Belden <Tim.Belden@enron.com>, Rick Shapiro
<rshapiro@enron.com>, Jim Steffes <james.d.steffes@enron.com>, Alan Comnes
<acomnes@enron.com>, Chris Calger <ccalger@enron.com>, Mary Hain
<mary.hain@enron.com>, Joe Hartsoe <Joe.Hartsoe@enron.com>, Donna Fulton
<Donna.Fulton@enron.com>, Steven Kean <Steven.J.Kean@enron.com>, Karen Denne
<kdenne@enron.com>, Beverly Aden <beverly.aden@enron.com>, Bill Votaw
<bill.votaw@enron.com>, Carol Moffett <carol.moffett@enron.com>, Debora
Whitehead <debora.whitehead@enron.com>, Dennis Benevides
<dennis.benevides@enron.com>, Don Black <don.black@enron.com>, Dorothy
Youngblood <dorothy.youngblood@enron.com>, "dblack@enron.com"
<dblack@enron.com>, "emelvin@enron.com" <emelvin@enron.com>,
"ehughes2@enron.com" <ehughes2@enron.com>, "gweiss@enron.com"
<gweiss@enron.com>, "gsavage@enron.com" <gsavage@enron.com>,
"Harry.Kingerski@enron.com" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "kgustafs@enron.com"
<kgustafs@enron.com>, Mike D Smith <msmith1@enron.com>, "sgahn@enron.com"
<sgahn@enron.com>, "vsharp@enron.com" <vsharp@enron.com>, "wcurry@enron.com"
<wcurry@enron.com>, "William.S.Bradford@enron.com"
<William.S.Bradford@enron.com>, Leslie Lawner <Leslie.Lawner@enron.com>, John
Neslage <john.neslage@enron.com>, Ken Smith <ken@kdscommunications.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: [Fwd: Direct Access Coalition Media Plan]

Attached, please find the latest information from the direct access
coalition.

Received: (qmail 77871 invoked by uid 41); 28 Feb 2001 04:07:03 -0000
Received: from nycxims1.edelman.com (63.96.56.110)  by mx7.quiknet.com with
SMTP; 28 Feb 2001 04:07:03 -0000
Received: by nycxims1.edelman.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<FY7A0FGF>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:46:37 -0500
Message-ID: <F1011D165600D411AC5400D0B720EE10A621F8@SFOXMB1>
From: "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>
To: dhunter@smithandkempton.com, brbarkovich@earthlink.net,
wbooth@booth-law.com, drothrock@cmta.net, jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com,
kmills@cfbf.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, mday@gmssr.com,  nplotkin@tfglobby.com,
spahnn@hnks.com, wlarson@calstate.edu,  vincent.stewart@ucop.edu,
gharrison@calstate.edu, sgovenar@govadv.com,  hgovenar@govadv.com,
smccubbi@enron.com, lhastings@cagrocers.com,  theo@ppallc.com,
cra@calretailers.com, mmoretti@calhealth.org,  wbrown@lhom.com,
randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com, "DiMare, Dominic"
<Dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, vjw@ceert.org, rcavanagh@nrdc.org,
rochmanm@spurr-remac.org, rrichter@calhealth.org, ken_pietrelli@ocli.com,
dennis.flatt@kp.org, richard.seguin@kp.org, arm@phaser.com,
djsmith@smithandkempton.com, "Fairchild, Tracy"
<tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>, "Allen, Stevan"  <stevan.allen@edelman.com>,
"Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>,  "Manuel, Erica"
<Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, "Warner, Jami"  <jami.warner@edelman.com>
Subject: Direct Access Coalition Media Plan
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:46:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0A139.07D39B10"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Hello to the Direct Access Coalition:

Below you will find a summary of the press strategy that Edelman Public
Relations intends to employ over the coming weeks in collaboration with the
Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and the broader Direct Access Coalition.
I will also outline the information that I need from Direct Access Coalition
members who are willing to be involved in media outreach and interviews.
And finally, I have attached supporting documents that you can use as
background material to prep for your responses to any media inquiries that
you may receive.

This Week

1.   We are drafting a "pitch letter" to send out by the end of this week
via blast e-mail and fax to the following media lists: 1)capitol press corps
reporters; 2) mainstream media reporters working the energy crisis; and 3)
trade media.  We may also outreach to our editorial board list as well.  Our
pitch will be focused on what it will really mean for small business and C&I
customers to lose the option of retail choice at a time when they are
suffering the financial hardships of skyrocketing energy bills. We will
address the effect on California's future business climate if direct access
is not preserved through legislation that corrects the problems that AB1x
caused for retail choice.  And finally, we will address the point that no
matter what direction California ultimately takes, direct access must be a
part of the solution.  Reporters have seen the recent polls which illustrate
California businesses' concerns with the path the state is on so this is a
prime opportunity to build on those recent media stories.

2.    We recommend a conference call with AReM and the Direct Access
Coalition on Friday to address the questions and suggestions on the press
strategy outlined here.

3.     Determine which people in the Direct Access Coalition are willing to
take media calls on behalf of the coalition.

Next Week

1.   Follow up with key reporters who received the pitch letter.

2.   Evaluate the language of SB 27x and determine whether there will be an
opportunity to hold a news conference with Sen. Bowen in the near future.
Monitor movement at the PUC and determine whether a press conference may be
effective in this arena, or whether we may need to use the option of sending
a media alert before the March 7 hearing, followed by a news release after
the hearing.

3.   Place op-eds (opinion pieces) with key newspapers.

4.   Contact radio news shows and TV public affairs shows (i.e. California
Capitol Week and the California Report) to secure
media interviews.

5.    Revise the SB 27x fact sheet (attached) to reflect the realities of
the amended language in SB 27x.

 What We Need From You

1.  If you are willing to speak with the media, or you have
customers/clients with a positive direct access story to tell, please
respond to this email as soon as you can with your name and contact
information.

2.  If you have draft op-eds written that need to be placed with newspapers
on behalf of your association and the broader coalition, we are willing to
do this for the you.

3.  If you have colleagues and/or staff that are already working with the
media it would be helpful to have this information so that we can
collaborate as necessary.

The Documents Below

>  All documents are works in progress, so if you have suggestions on
> potential changes, please feel free to share them with us.
>

Thank you.

>  <<AREM Fact Sheet 2212001 ver 2272001.doc>>
>  <<Q&A @ ESP Reversions 22701.doc>>  <<AReM FAQ FINAL3.doc>>  <<AREM Fact
> FINAL3.doc>>
>
> Tracy Fairchild
> Account Supervisor
> Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
> (916) 442-2331
> tracy.fairchild@edelman.com
>

 - AREM Fact Sheet 2212001 ver 2272001.doc
 - Q&A @ ESP Reversions 22701.doc
 - AReM FAQ FINAL3.doc
 - AREM Fact FINAL3.doc


Attached please find the discussion notes for the offsite meeting on
Friday, February 4th.

If you have any questions or comments, please let me know.

Vince Kaminski (by Shirley Crenshaw)
3-3848


Find attached below Stephen Cooper's voice mail message of Friday, 3/29/02.

ENA HR
x7404
x8321