Hi Folks,

Our Footballguy Scott Luebke takes a look at this week's Updgrades and
Downgrades.

Enjoy!

Joe

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Upgrades

QB - Aaron Brooks - Brooks and the Saints offense are clicking now and
Brooks' fantasy owners must be ecstatic.  Brooks has scored multiple
touchdowns in 3 of the last 4 weeks and I expect this trend to continue for
the remainder of the season.  With an easier schedule and better decision
making, Brooks has been able to connect with Aaron Brooks, Willie Jackson
and breakout tight end Boo Williams.

QB - Jeff Garcia - Garcia continues to put up exceptional numbers.  He has
thrown for 3 or more touchdowns in 5 of the last 6 games.  I wouldn't bench
Garcia in favor of any quarterback in the league right now.  He is a stud.

QB - Charlie Batch - Batch's 436 yard, 3 touchdown performance deserves
recognition.  However, I still think Batch will see bench time as the Lions
give backup Mike McMahon some playing time towards the end of the season for
the winless Lions.  A tough schedule remains for Batch and the Lions as
Green Bay, Chicago (2), Tampa Bay and Pittsburgh are left on the schedule.

QB - Rich Gannon - A strong performance on Sunday with 311 yards and 4
touchdowns proves Gannon and the Raiders offense is the team to beat in the
AFC.  With Tim Brown and Jerry Rice looking fantastic, Gannon will continue
to post good numbers for the remainder of the season.

QB - Kurt Warner - Warner looked good on Sunday night with 401 yards and 3
touchdowns.  More importantly, he did not appear to be hampered by a thumb
injury that has been nagging him throughout the season.  As always, keep
Warner in your starting lineup.

QB - Jake Plummer - Plummer looked good on Sunday with 334 passing yards and
4 touchdowns.  Keep in mind, this performance was against the hapless Lions.
Look for Plummer to return to his normal erratic self in the next two weeks
against San Diego and Oakland.  Plummer might be a good option for playoff
weeks as he faces Dallas in week 15 and Carolina in week 16.

RB - Shaun Alexander - Plain and simple, Alexander produces when he is in
the lineup.  He scored his 10th touchdown of the season on Sunday and nearly
cleared 100 yards once again.  Look for Alexander to remain the starter once
Watters returns from injury.

RB -  Duce Staley - Staley continues to look better and better.  The 133
total yards on Sunday will be a sign of things to come for Staley in the
second half of the season.  Philadelphia's offense and a rock solid defense
will keep the Eagles in the lead in the majority of games.  With Correll
Buckhalter in trouble with a team suspension due to marijuana, Staley will
not lose many carries to Buckhalter.

RB - Warrick Dunn - Dunn managed just 12 yards rushing against a solid Bears
defense, but a 12 catch, 138 yard receiving performance helps vault him into
the upgrades section.  More importantly, it appears that Dunn has returned
to 100% after being hampered by foot and hamstring injuries.

RB - Garrison Hearst - Hearst nearly reached the 100-yard plateau once
again.  He has looked good the last few weeks and should continue this trend
for the remainder of the season.  The 49ers offense continues to look good
and a favorable schedule gives Hearst the advantage over a majority of
starting running backs in the league.

RB - Ricky Williams - The Saints offense is looking sharp and efficient.
With Brooks making wise decisions, the offense will continue to get better
and this will lead to more scoring opportunities for Williams.  Williams has
topped the 120 yard mark in consecutive weeks.  Look for this trend to
continue as the Saints have a favorable schedule in the second half of the
season.

WR - Marty Booker - The Bears finally starting passing the ball downfield
and Booker's statistics were directly affected.  He burned the Buccaneers
for 3 long touchdowns on the day and made it look rather easy.  Look for
more longer passes out of the Bears in the second half of the season.  With
teams starting to "sell out" to the run, Booker and Miller should connect on
some play action pass touchdowns.

WR - Joe Horn - Horn remains one of the hottest receivers in the league with
8 catches for 148 yards on Sunday.  With Aaron Brooks making wiser
decisions, the New Orleans offense has started putting touchdowns on the
board.  Although this may be bad news for John Carney owners, it is good
news for Horn, Ricky Williams, and Willie Jackson.

WR - Jerry Rice - With Tim Brown receiving the majority of attention from
defenses, Rice will continue to be effective on the other side of the field.
The career touchdown leader added 3 more to his total on Sunday and made it
look rather easy.  With the Oakland offense looking good, Rice should
continue to see scoring chances.  A good option for a 3rd wide receiver in
your lineup.

WR - Peerless Price - With 10 catches and 138 yards receiving on Sunday,
Price continues to outperform Eric Moulds in the Bills offense and have many
fantasy owners questioning who is the number one receiver in Buffalo.  With
Eric Moulds being shut down with double teams, Price has quietly scored 5
touchdowns on the season.  Price is a talented receiver and should continue
to score a touchdown every other week.

WR - Hines Ward - Ward has amassed 26 catches in his last 3 games. He has
only scored two touchdowns on the season, but his reception and yardage
numbers are becoming a consistent factor on a weekly basis.  I've never been
a big fan of the Steelers passing game, but Ward deserves consideration for
active duty on a weekly basis.

WR - David Boston - Boston's 100-yard game streak ended this week.  Fantasy
owners had to settle for 80 yards receiving and 2 touchdowns.  Look for
Boston to continue to put up quality numbers.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Downgrades

QB - Brian Griese - The ankle injury to Rod Smith had me worried a little
bit heading into Sunday's game, so I was not surprised by Griese's poor
performance on Sunday.  With Smith hobbled by injuries and McCaffrey out for
the year, Griese's receiving options were limited and his production was
directly affected.  You may want to consider benching Griese until Smith is
healthy.  However, the Broncos do play Dallas on Thanksgiving.

QB - Tim Couch - Couch threw 3 interceptions and was held to 144 passing
yards against a stingy Ravens defense.  Couch should be considered a quality
keeper quarterback, but the Browns schedule will make Couch an inconsistent
quarterback for the remainder of this season.  Couch should do well against
Cincinnati and Jacksonville, but struggle against New England, Green Bay and
Pittsburgh.

QB - Mark Brunell - An injured quad injury kept Brunell out of the lineup
this week.  With an unfavorable matchup against Baltimore this week, it may
be best to start someone else this week.

QB - Elvis Grbac - Grbac looked horrible with 4 interceptions on Sunday.
The week was not a total disappointment for Grbac as he threw 2 touchdown
passes. The schedule looks favorable for Grbac, but he is struggling, which
concerns me.

QB - Tony Banks - Banks suffered a concussion in Sunday's game against
Denver.  The injury looked severe as Banks was slammed to the ground and
then taken off the field on a stretcher.

QB - Jay Fiedler - Fiedler threw 3 interceptions and 2 touchdowns on Sunday.
Unfortunately, Fiedler's two touchdowns were scored by the Jets defense.
The up and down season for Fiedler continues.  With games against Buffalo,
Indianapolis and San Francisco left on the schedule, Fiedler should still be
considered a quality "spot starter".

RB - Eddie George - George was held to 61 yards on 23 carries Sunday.  He
has yet to break the 100-yard barrier in a game this season.  I guess the
toe injury in the preseason affected his performance more than most
anticipated.  Although we can blame the toe injury, two other factors have
meant the demise of George this season.  First, the loss of lead back
Lorenzo Neal has minimized running lanes.  Finally, the Titans offensive
line is not giving George the quality run blocking of the previous seasons.

RB - Anthony Thomas - Thomas was held under 60 yards for the second
consecutive game.  With opposing defenses focusing on stopping the run,
Thomas will continue to find the running room a little tougher throughout
the remainder of the season.  Keep in mind, the Bears last two opponents
(Green Bay and Tampa Bay) are two of the better defenses against the run in
the league.  With Tampa Bay, Green Bay, Minnesota and Detroit (2) on the
schedule for the remainder of the season, expect Thomas' stats to be up and
down.

RB - Lamar Smith - With 53 rushing yards on 19 carries, Smith continues to
struggle.  This marks the 5th consecutive game that Smith has been held 3
yards/carry.  Don't be surprised if the Dolphins give Travis Minor a larger
role in the running game.

RB - Travis Henry - Henry continues to struggle.  He managed just 29 yards
on 13 carries this past Sunday and had a crucial fumble.  A running back can
not be productive with just 13 carries.  Keep him on your bench.

WR - Rod Smith - Suffering from an ankle injury, Smith was limited to 25
yards on three catches.  He did manage to score a touchdown.  Smith's ankle
injury deserved your attention.  The Broncos kept Smith on the sidelines
late in the 4th quarter while the team was attempting to drive down the
field and tie the ball game.  The short week will not help Smith's status on
Thanksgiving Day.

WR - Eric Moulds - The disappointing season for Moulds continues.  He was
held to 61 yards on Sunday while Peerless Price gained 138 on the other side
of the field.  Moulds may not even be the best fantasy option on the Bills
at this point.

WR - Wayne Chrebet - A shoulder injury to Chrebet limited his production on
Sunday.  Testaverde and the passing game isn't looking very good at this
point.  You may want to bench Chrebet until he is 100% healthy.

WR - Todd Pinkston - Pinkston has become a regular on the downgrade list.
Heck, I like the guy and think he could become special.  However, he remains
to do what is needed....produce on a consistent basis.

WR - Muhsin Muhammad - Muhammad suffered a sprained shoulder and was unable
to play in the second half against San Francisco.  Heck, his production was
not missed.  It's pretty difficult to miss little to no production, if you
know what I mean.  If you're a Muhammad owner, you know what I mean.

WR - Reggie Wayne - Wayne suffered a sprained knee on Sunday and his status
is not yet known.  He has yet to do anything special this season, but his
expectations were fairly high, so I'll downgrade him

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Waiver Wire

Keep in mind, the waiver wire analysis selections are based off of 12 and 14
team leagues.

QB - Alex Van Pelt - Van Pelt stepped in the lineup and looked good on
Sunday with 316 passing yards and two touchdowns.  He has a talented
receiving crew with Moulds, Price and Riemersma.  As long as he can get pass
protection, his production could be a welcome addition to fantasy teams in
need of a quarterback.

RB - Ben Gay - Gay was the feature back on Sunday with 18 carries for 56
yards and a touchdown against a quality Baltimore Ravens defense.  No other
running back has taken over the reigns of the Browns rushing offense.  Gay
may just be that guy.

RB - Amos Zeroue - Although he suffered a sprained shoulder against the
Browns, Zeroue is expected to return to the team this week against
Jacksonville.  If you have Jerome Bettis on your team, Zeroue deserves a
roster spot.  If not, you may want to take a flyer on this guy.  The
Steelers have a solid running game and an injury to Bettis would open the
door for Zeroue to produce quality numbers.

RB - Lamont Jordan - Jordan is in a similar situation as Zeroue.  If Curtis
Martin gets injured, Jordan would enter the lineup and produce quality
numbers.  Not a bad option, if you can spare a roster spot.  If you have
Curtis Martin, get Lamont Jordan.

WR - JJ Stokes - Stokes looked good on Sunday with 72 yards and a touchdown.
This marks the second consecutive game with 72 yards.  With the 49ers
looking good in the passing game, a healthy Stokes could be a decent "spot
starter".

WR - Keith Poole - Poole was unable to do anything on Sunday against the
Redskins.  However, he continues to learn the offense and should start
producing very shortly.  Poole's effectiveness will most likely occur with a
healthy Rod Smith garnering double/triple teams on the opposite side of the
field.

TE - "Boo" Williams - "Boo" has me excited about his potential.  He's a big,
fast tight end with good hands.  Plain and simple, he has big play potential
and should produce in the Saints offense.

/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/**/

Bryant Analytics, Inc.   All Rights Reserved 1999-2001

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


I realize you have pushed these guys already, but the attached letter would
be better if not sent at all.  It doesn't address the real underlying problem
-- that a "reliability bill" on a stand alone basis doesn't fix the problem.
Instead, the letter implies that the reason for opposition is merely a
political consideration -- ie that it may reduce Congress' appetite for
action next year.  If possible, it would be better not to have the letter go
out at all.

	From:  Cynthia Sandherr                           08/22/2000 04:29 PM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com
cc:

Subject: MidAmerican Draft Documents

Per my first e-mail, here's MidAmerican's position letter on the stand alone
Reliability measure.  Seems the best we can do with the utilities who have
been supporting our position is to have them take a "no position" stance on
the stand alone bill.

 - reliabilityonly.letter.doc


Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


Here are some more thoughts:
FERC should take a hard look at why the ISO is almost always in an "inc"
situation in real time.  Without structural incentives to go short into real
time, I would expect the CAISO to "inc" in some hours and "dec" in others --
with no consistent patterns.
The IOU's have four choices for purchasing power:  PX Block Forward, PX Day
Ahead, PX Day Of, and CAISO Ex Post.  They had ample opportunity to purchase
lower cost power in the PX Block Forward but didn't buy enough.  That left
them short in the Day Ahead.  They can reduce Day Ahead prices by moving some
of their load to the Ex Post market.  Dave Parquet did an Econ 101
presentation on this incentive at the CAISO board meeting in June.
The ISO remains primarily in "inc" mode even during the shoulder months when
prices are lower, another indicator that the real time "inc" problem is
driven by the load side rather than the supply side.  The IOU's continue to
go short into the ISO Ex Post market even when the CAISO Ex Post price is
consistently above the PX Day Ahead price.
There is evidence that the IOU's are not willing to pay above the CAISO price
cap for energy from the PX in the Day Ahead market.  Does it matter that the
price cap for the ISO also acts as a PX price cap?
The NOx market in California is very tight.  How has this contributed to
higher costs and has the complete lack of available NOx credits prevented any
generators from running?
How large was the impact of the below normal water year on the supply side?
The attached presentation quantifies this effect in the Northwest.  (I have a
theory on how hydro capacity completely overstates reserve margins in the
west from an economic perspective.  I can go into more detail if you wish.)
Friction between California PX and ISO markets and other western markets.
For example, why are actual flows going into the state yet prices out side of
the state are higher?  Another example of anomylous behavior is at COB on
8/11 and 8/12.  There was congestion from California TO the northwest those
days in the Day Ahead market.  In real time the NW ended up being a net
seller of about 3,000 MW from the NW TO California.
Demand Side - we really need to press on this issue because all of the
proponents of price caps claim that as soon as the demand side is "workably
competitive" then there is no need for price caps.  Is large-scale economic
demand response required for a competitive market?  What if demand response
is there, but at very high prices?  The demand response in California is a
joke.  With 2700 MW of interuptible, why did the utilities and the CAISO only
get around 600 MW of economic demand response.  Much of this response comes
at $1500/MWh.  The assymetric treatment of supply side resources and demand
side resources can be justified on environmental grounds, but not economic
grounds.  So why this assymetric treatment?  This gets to the question of the
fine line between "scarcity rents" which are ok, and market power which is
not.  If power is scarce, and demand truly values it at $1500/MWh then
shouldn't that be the price.  At what price would the rest of the
interuptible load economically curtail?  Bottom line -- there are about 2,000
MW of load that should be able to respond to price signals that chooses not
to or values power at more than $1500/MWh.
Burden of proof -- what empirical measures should be used to assess market
power?  The reports published to date have been unimpressive.  The Market
Analysis Unit report, for example, does a bunch of handwaving and then
concludes that there is market power.  But they never explain why.  I would
think that proof might be something like this:  Generator X sets price y% of
the time when loads exceed Z MWs.  Or, four generators set price 80% of the
time when prices exceed $200/MWh.  They have all the data to be able to tell,
yet they don't provide any empirical measures.  The only test I've heard of
so far is the UC Energy Institute report that demonstrates that generators
are submitting bids above their marginal cost.  The PX report states that
supply bids are fewer and at higher prices than last year.  They fail to
mention the fact that there are 5,000 fewer MW of hydro this year relative to
last.

James D Steffes@EES
08/17/2000 06:18 AM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno
Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: FERC INVESTIGATION IN CA - What should they be looking for?

As we begin to meet with FERC Staff on the Wholesale market issues related to
CA problems, I think that we need to put together a list of questions that
FERC needs to be asking Western power market participants.

The following are some questions that I think are important to have FERC ask;
I'm sure there are more.

1. Were California utilities underscheduling load into the PX day ahead
market?
2. How many MWs did the CA ISO procure during each hour during the Summer
2000?  How does this compare with CA ISO procurement during 1999?
3. Has PG&E changed its bidding behavior associated with its Hydro facilities
in 2000?
3. Are there baseload facilities that were operated differently in 2000 than
in 1999?
4. Were any generation plants off-line due to unplanned maintenance during
Summer 2000?
5. How did the CA ISO demand side program work?  Why didn't more load
participate?
6. What options did SDG&E have to "hedge" its retail rates?  What were prices
in the CAL PX block forward market on Jan 15, 2000 and May 15, 2000?
7. How high did natural gas prices go in California for generation during
Summer 2000?
8. Were other Western power markets prices higher (year-on-year)?
9. Did the CA ISO Board face political pressure to reduce bid caps?  Is this
appropriate for a FERC jurisdictional entity?
10. What specific details is SDG&E referring to in its Complaint on
"unworkably competitive" CA ISO markets?  Can these be fixed "quickly"?

Please add other questions.

Jim


_____________________DAVID COURSEY_____________________

HO-HO-HOW TO BUY A COMPUTER FOR CHRISTMAS

    It's that time of year again! If you're considering
         buying yourself a spiffy new PC (maybe spiced
         up with a broadband Internet connection?)
         or are looking to bestow technological riches
         on someone else this season, don't miss this
         great advice from Santa David.

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1126/2826742:8593142

#

_____________________NEWS ANALYSIS_____________________

Sylvia Carr

    SONY ON DVD FENCE... NEW LOOK FOR LINUX... MS SERVERS
ATTACKED...

    The battle over which DVD format will
    become the industry standard wages
    on. Sony's weighed in on which one it
    prefers, but its stance is hardly decisive.
    Also, a new graphical interface for
    Linux and other Unix-like OS's has arrived,
    and a worm is wreaking havoc on Microsoft
    SQL servers.

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1126/2827001:8593142

_____________________EXPERT ADVICE_____________________

Lee Schlesinger

  WHY A 'PATCHWORK' APPROACH TO SECURITY IS RIGHT
  FOR YOUR BIZ

   If you're concerned about keeping your network
         safe from hackers, crackers, and worms, there's
         an easy way to do it: stay up to date with patches.
         But most organizations don't have a patchwork
         plan. Lee Schlesinger explains why that's
         important--and shows you how to take the right
         approach.

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1126/2826693:8593142

			> > > > >

Larry Dignan

  WHY CELL PHONE GIANT NOKIA'S GOING GADGET-HAPPY

   It's not the greatest time to be a wireless
         company. Nokia's response? Go all out with
         a slew of new gadget phones. Larry looks at
         Nokia's attempt to convince you to swap your
         old phone for a jazzier one.

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1126/2826669:8593142

			> > > > >

Preston Gralla

  STEAL A DEAL! GET SWEET SAVINGS WITH 3 FREE SHOPPING
  TOOLS

   The holiday gift-buying rush is on! This year,
         don't be caught in crowds at the mall. Shop
         online instead. Preston finds 3 free shopping
         companions that make sure you get the best
         price on all your online purchases.

http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?/adeskb/adt1126/2826649:8593142

			> > > > >

_____________________CRUCIAL CLICKS_____________________
Make sure you see these features on ZDNet today!

DON'T MISS ZDNET'S HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE
http://chkpt.zdnet.com/chkpt/adeskclicks/http://www.zdnet.com/special/holiday2001/index.html

CHECK OUT THIS COOLER THAN COOL DIGITAL CAMERA
http://www.zdnet.com/supercenter/stories/overview/0,12069,540146,00.html

MIDDLEWARE FRONT AND CENTER IN DOJ SETTLEMENT
http://www.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2825333,00.html

******************ELSEWHERE ON ZDNET!******************

Check out the season's best tech gear in our Holiday Gift Guide!
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?164489

Get the latest enterprise application news, reviews and analysis.
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?164490

Browse this week's top 50 tech products at ZDNet Shopper.
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?164491

PCs, notebooks, PDAs, and more -- find perfect gifts for everyone.
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?164492

Does your career need a jumpstart? View over 90,000 job listings.
http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?164493

***********************************************************

AnchorDesk comes to you free of charge as a
service of ZDNet. On its companion Web site,
AnchorDesk includes full details on the stories
you see above, plus late-breaking news, links
to in-depth information, and much more. Visit:
http://www.anchordesk.com

To subscribe, unsubscribe, or make changes to your subscription,
please go to:
 http://cgi.zdnet.com/slink?130228

We are sending this news alert to the address:
pallen@ENRON.COM
Please make sure to provide this address in
all your e-mail messages to us.  Thanks!

Copyright ? 2001 ZD Inc. ZDNet is a registered
service mark of ZD Inc. ZDNet Logo is a service
mark of ZD Inc.

 ###


Hot List for 02/25/02

Hi from Onetravel.com!

*******************************************************************
This is a post-only e-mail. Please do not reply to this newsletter.
We want to hear from you. Send all comments to editor@onetravel.com
*******************************************************************

IN THIS ISSUE:

* HOT DEAL OF THE WEEK: 3 nights in Cancun from $316 with airfare!
* ADVENTURE ENTHUSIASTS: EcoAdventure Tour in Costa Rica from $1,197!
* AERO MEXICO LAST MINUTE SALE: Round-trip fares from $189!
* SKI BRECKENRIDGE, CO: 7 nights from $410 per person!
* ENJOY LIFE & TRAVEL THE WORLD WITH ALlITALIA! Round-trip fares from $290!
* HOTEL ROOMS IN KISSIMMEE: Book a hotel room from $44 per night!
* GOLF IN SCOTLAND: 7 nights in St. Andrews, Scotland with 3 rounds of golf!
* LAST WEEK'S MOST POPULAR DESTINATION: Book your vacation to Cancun!
* THRIFTY SAVINGS: Free upgrade or 10% off!
* SMART TRAVELERS' CORNER: Detroit's new terminal opens. Part One - The Old.

---
* ADDITIONAL STEALS AND DEALS FROM Onetravel.com!
______________________________________________________________________

HOT DEAL OF THE WEEK: 3 nights in Cancun from $316 with airfare!

Cancun -- another name for paradise!  Stroll the beach at sunset and view cloudless, starry skies at night. By day, take a ferry to Isla Mujeres and watch fishermen cast their nets into the sea.  Discover the ideal vacation in Cancun with low rates from $316 per person at the Continental Plaza Playacar.  Packages available from Atlanta, Baltimore, Charlotte, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Louisville, Memphis, Nashville, New Orleans, Orlando (Sanford) and Washington (Dulles). Land-only packages and other departure cities are available.  Packages available through June 2002 and include:

? Round-trip airfare
? Hotel accommodations

Click here
http://www.11th.com/fmv.php3?dest_loc=64&DK=11&token=15
for online booking!

Prices are per person based on double occupancy. Single/triple/child rates available upon request. Some taxes/fees are additional. Holiday supplements may apply. Proof of citizenship is required for travel from the U.S. Passport and visa requirements change regularly; it is the customer's responsibility to make sure all required documents are present at time of travel.

---------
ADVENTURE ENTHUSIASTS: EcoAdventure Tour in Costa Rica from $1,197!

Experience Costa Rica with a vacation filled with adventure. You will spend seven days experiencing different adventure activities such as horseback riding, whitewater rafting, mountain biking, hiking, and snorkeling! What a way to experience the beauty of Costa Rica!  Packages are available through November 2002 and include:

? White water rafting (Class III)
? Mountain biking tour in Sarapiqui area
? Horseback riding in La Fortuna
? Hiking and tree top canopy tour at the Ecolodge
? Snorkeling tour in the Ocotal Beach area (scuba diving optional)
? 6 breakfasts & 5 lunches
? 6 nights accommodations in modest lodges

Click below
http://www.11th.com/fmv.php3?depart_city=LND&dest_loc=815_1224&DK=11&token=15
for online booking!

Prices are per person based on double occupancy. Single/triple rates (where available) upon request. Some taxes/fees are additional. Prices are in U.S. Dollars. Proof of citizenship is required for travel from the U.S. Subject to change without notice. $20 Costa Rican Departure Tax is payable at the airport before departing the country.

---------
AERO MEXICO LAST MINUTE SALE: Round-trip fares from $189!

Adventure lies ahead under the radiant Mexican sun! Snorkel in Cancun. Explore Mexico City. Here are just some of our unbelievable round-trip fares to Mexico:

? Dallas/Ft. Worth to Mexico City from $309
? Phoenix to Hermosillo from $189
? Miami to Merida from $319
? Las Vegas to Monterrey from $259
? Los Angeles to Puerto Vallarta from $225
? Chicago to Mexico City from $320
? San Diego to San Jose Cabo from $199

Other great destinations include:
? Acapulco
? Aguascalientes
? Cancun
? Guadalajara
? Leon

Click the link below
http://partner.onetravel.com/go/go.cfm?GoID=23936
enter your departure and destination city of choice &
get going!

Valid for travel by 3/11/02. Sale ends February 27!  Additional restrictions may apply.

---------
SKI BRECKENRIDGE, CO: 7 nights from $410 per person!

If you're not ready to give up winter sports, then this is the package for you! Visit the small mining town of Breckenridge and enjoy the exceptional skiing this quaint town has to offer. Take pleasure in shopping at all the boutiques and shops! Experience fine dining, cafes and nightlife. Packages are available through May 2002 and include:

? Hotel Accommodations (extra nights available)
? Optional room upgrades are available

Click below
http://www.11th.com/fmv.php3?dest_loc=747_1279_1278&DK=11&token=15
for online booking!

Prices are per person based on double occupancy and availability. Weekend surcharges apply. Rates for units that accommodate up to 8 adults available upon request. Taxes are additional. Holiday blackouts may apply.

---------
ENJOY LIFE & TRAVEL THE WORLD WITH ALITALIA! Round-trip fares from $290!

Europe is a paradise with so much beauty to offer visitors.  Go to Amsterdam!  Go to Barcelona!  Go to Dublin!  Travel the World!  If you've been waiting to take that dream vacation, then your wait is over.

Sample fares* to charming European Destinations:

? NYC to Amsterdam from $290
? Boston to Barcelona from $302
? Chicago to Dublin from $395
? Miami to Nice from $348
? Los Angeles to Athens from $435

Other exotic destinations include:
? Brussels
? Budapest
? Frankfurt
? Madrid
? Moscow
? Paris
? Warsaw
? Zurich

Travel mid-week to best the best fares. Travel to any Alitalia destination worldwide and rediscover your passion...Alitalia gets you there in style.

Click below to search for fares:
http://partner.onetravel.com/go/go.cfm?GoID=23935

*Taxes, fees and surcharges may not be included in sample fares.  Remember to book by March 1, 2002.  Travel must be completed by March 23, 2002. Minimum stay is a Saturday night.  Last date to book is 3/1/02.

---------
HOTEL ROOMS IN KISSIMMEE: Book a hotel room from $44 per night!

Book a hotel room from $44 per night at the Ramada Inn Westgate! Whether you want to ride the excitement of the many Orlando theme parks or explore the less traveled side of the city, Kissimmee is close to it all! Museums, science centers, national wildlife refuges, state parks, botanical gardens and the Astronaut Hall of Fame - whatever your pleasure - you'll find it in Kissimmee!  Book a hotel room from $44 per night at the Ramada Inn Westgate and get moving!

For online booking click below:
http://partner.onetravel.com/go/go.cfm?GoID=23934&Token=Feb25KissRamada

---------
GOLF IN SCOTLAND: 7 nights in St. Andrews, Scotland from $636 per person with 3 rounds of golf!

Spend seven nights in St. Andrew, Scotland from $636 per person!  This medieval town is known to the world as the "Home of Golf".  Whether you want to spend your day on the golf course, taking in the sights or relaxing in a spa, you'll find it in St. Andrew!  Three and seven-night packages (land only) available through April 2002 and include:

? Accommodations in a standard twin or king room
? Full Scottish Breakfast daily
? Two rounds of golf on the Torrance Course or one Spa Treatment for 3-night packages or
? Three rounds of golf on the Torrance Course or two Spa Treatments for 7-night packages
? Unlimited use of the Practice Range
? Complimentary use of the Leisure Club

Click below
http://www.11th.com/fmv.php3?LND&dest_loc=2495_965&DK=11&token=15
for online booking!

Prices are per person based on double occupancy. Value added tax of 17.5% is included, some taxes/fees are additional. Proof of citizenship is required for travel from the U.S. Passport and visa requirements change regularly; it is the customer's responsibility to make sure all proper documents are present at time of travel.

---------
LAST WEEK'S MOST POPULAR DESTINATION: Book your vacation to Cancun!

Here's the most popular destination from the previous week...Cancun! It was the white sand beaches, tropical sun and the nightlife that enticed the majority of our customers. Remember, as we make enhancements be sure to tell us what you think, please email  editor@onetravel.com.

Click below
http://www.11th.com/fmv.php3?dest_loc=64&DK=11&token=15
to view our Cancun packages!

---------
THRIFTY SAVINGS: Free upgrade or 10% off!

Present coupon at any Thrifty location worldwide and receive a free one car class upgrade up to a full size car or 10% off your rental.  Offer expires 12/31/02.

Click here
http://www.onetravel.com/www/specials/spdealthrifty10off.cfm?DK=1000003462
for coupon!

Offer may not be combined with any other discounts and is not available with tour or insurance replacement rates or with rentals that exceed two weeks.  Advance reservations are required. Reservations must be made with OneTravel.com to qualify for the upgrade or the discounted rental.

---------
SMART TRAVELERS' CORNER: This week, columnist Bob Jones provides tips on getting the best travel deal.

Spring break for Travel 101 Students! (We will resume the frugal travel course in two weeks.)

Detroit's new terminal opens.  Part One - The Old.

Sometimes as I sit and read articles in news papers and other publications, I just wonder why my fellow writers extol things like the cost of a terminal, number of gates, whether or not you can buy a suit of clothes, or the number of seats set aside for caf? dining.  You get the dimensions, who built it, what it replaced and why, along with all sorts of other facts and figures.  Which, by the way, are virtually useless to travelers.

Last year, the airport code DTW, appeared on my boarding passes 38 times.  Once every 10 days, I was in the old Detroit terminal going from one flight to another.  Usually hauling kids and their toys along the way.  Coming into the International Terminal and connecting out of C-26 was an exercise in frustration!  Believe me, an hour from international to domestic was often not enough!  I listened as the pilots came on the intercom to tell us that, "It will be just a minute folks before we push back from the gate because of traffic in the corridor behind us."  Usually the minute was ten and capable of stretching to 15 or 20!  Bathrooms in the old terminal were few and far between.  I honestly don't recall a time I didn't see a line at the woman's bathroom during peak hours, so I would have to wait with my six year-old daughter since she was past the age of using the men's room.  Things like these and more were areas of concern to me, the real traveler, not how high the roof i!
s or what supports it or how many tiles were used in the ceiling.  So how does the new terminal stack up?  Phenomenally!

To really do the comparison, I flew from Grand Rapids to Indianapolis the evening of the 23rd.  Of course, we arrived early in Detroit for the connection and had to wait for a gate.  Passing through the old terminal, I noticed business as usual; heavy crowds even on a Saturday afternoon.  Things were in boxes behind the podiums ready to be moved and a sense of anticipation was afoot.  As I passed the entrance to the elevator that took NWA pilots and flight attendants to down to their lounge, many remarked that this would be their last trip to the dungeon.  I boarded my flight to Indianapolis? we had to wait for traffic behind us to "clear the corridor."  Ten minutes later, we were on our way.  Next week, the New Terminal!

See you on a Detroit flight soon,

Bob

---------
ADDITIONAL STEALS AND DEALS FROM Onetravel.com!

3 nights in Las Vegas from $199 per person!
http://www.11th.com/fmv.php3?dest_loc=130&DK-11&token=15

5 nights in Singapore from $764 per person with air!
http://www.11th.com/fmv.php3?dest_loc=92&DK=11&token=15

4 nights in Victoria, British Columbia from $186 per person!
http://www.11th.com/fmv.php3?dest_loc=576&DK=11&token=15

7 nights in Kauai, Hawaii from $345 per person!
http://www.11th.com/fmv.php3?dest_loc=649&DK=11&token=15

---------
QUESTIONS? COMMENTS?  We'd love to hear from you!  Drop us a line at editor@onetravel.com. Send us your travel questions for professional advice from our panel of experts, or stop by http://www.onetravel.com for loads of helpful information in our Advisor section.

(We regret that due to the volume of mail we receive, we cannot assist with individual pricing requests. Please consult our FAQs for booking assistance.)

REMEMBER... Onetravel.com's everyday discounts can save you up to 70% off
regular airfares...
For airline bookings - US and Worldwide - go directly to:
http://air.onetravel.com
For hotel bookings - US and Worldwide - go directly to:
http://hotel.onetravel.com
For car rentals - US and Worldwide - go directly to:
http://car.onetravel.com
For vacation package bookings - go directly to:
http://vacation.onetravel.com
Until next time....Happy Travels from Onetravel.com
___________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to MODIFY your Savings ALERT! mailings or UNSUBSCRIBE from our
mailing list, go to http://www.onetravel.com/deals/SA_npu_modify1.cfm and
enter the email address (sscott5@enron.com) to which this message was sent.
___________________________________________________________________________
EID=559944****2


Dr. Lay:

You will be pleasantly surprised to receive this e-mail from an Enron
Employee.

Please note that you are the first and only person in Enron that will know
about the endeavors that this e-mail discusses.

Background:
In 1986 while I was taking a graduate course in Economics as part of my MBA
program, I started to think that there exists some similarities between
Economics and Thermodynamics. In 1988, I discussed my initial thoughts with
Dr. Ibrahim Oweiss, professor of Economics at Georgetown University and we
agreed to investigate this topic. Since that time, I worked with Professor
Oweiss on and off investigating the subject. In the last couple of years, we
started to make good progress, that was culminated recently by submitting
three papers for publication (see table below).

List of Papers
#	Paper Title	Abstract	Status
1	On the Analogies between &Economics8 and &Thermodynamics8	Part I: &Basics8
		This part identifies certain analogies between Economics and Thermodynamics.
The analogies between &Abilities8 and &Energy8, &Utility8 and &Work8,
&Capital8 and &Heat8, &Marginal Utility8 and &Pressure8, &Relative Income8
and &Temperature8, as well as &LABOR EFFORT8 and &Entropy8 are discussed.
		This part concludes that the suggested analogies bring about new approaches
that will explain some economic complexities by borrowing or building upon
some  concepts, theories and experiences in Thermodynamics.
		Part II: &Applications8
		This second Part builds upon the basics introduced in Part I where analogies
between Economics and Thermodynamics have been drawn. In this Part, the
application of the analogies is utilized to analyze some of the topics
economists deal with. This Part presents a fresh approach that holds
promising vehicles that can explain some of the paradoxes economists have
been facing for years. 	Submitted for publications as a working paper at the
Department of Economics at Georgetown University. (November 2000)
2	A New Approach to
	&Production Theory8	This paper introduces a fresh approach to the Production Theory.
		Unlike the conventional approach of relating production to Capital and Labor
along the line suggested by Cobb Douglas, the approach this paper takes is
relating the production to utility change which in turn is related to changes
in capital and labor effort.
		This approach affords more generality and helps in the explanation of some
paradoxes that the Cobb Douglas theory could not explain. 	Submitted for
publications in &Economic Theory8, (October 2000)
3	The Capital Engine Concept	This Paper presents a fresh approach that explains
several observations in economics.
		The concept is used to discuss some of the trends the economic growth theory
exhibits.
		It is also used to explain gains in productivity associated with technology
improvements.
		The Capital Engine concept presented in this paper could serve as a basis for
new growth theory.	Submitted for publications in &Economic Theory8, October 2000)

A fourth paper entitled "Innovation: Why" is under preparation. In this
paper, we are able to substantiate  based on the concept of  the Capital
Engine that innovation is the most important driver for economic growth. You
can see why I chose these two words in the title of the paper from my Enron
world.

I have been collaborating with Professor Oweiss on my own time and I am
pleased that we managed to get to this point. Professor Oweiss and I are now
convinced that we have reached some breakthroughs that could revolutionize
the study of Economics. We also feel that we can build further on what we
reached, and even making more valuable contributions.

I am sure that you will be pleased to learn of the above, of course being an
Economist you shall appreciate it even more.

As I reach this critical stage on our path of this research project,  I would
like to seek Enron support in two areas:

I.   Patent(s) / Copy Righting:
     I feel that the contributions that are covered in the three papers are
original and may warrant patenting / copy righting.
     Since I am the primary author of these papers I wanted to have some
credit go to Enron.

II.  Grant / Sponsorship:
     I feel that my endeavors which have been purely on my own personal time
so far, need to be replaced by a more concerted effort now that we have
reached a
     critical mass. Towards this end, Dr. Oweiss and myself are taking steps
to get funding from the National Science Foundation for a joint research
project that
     would be carried out through the Georgetown University.
     I do not know of any particular programs within Enron that would afford
me the opportunity to complete a project like the one we are envisaging.
     I feel that such a research program will be very valuable.  I am further
convinced that such program will not be only of an academic value but it will
have
     significant impact to the business world.

 I trust that the publicity that Enron being the leading company in
innovation would get out of the success that I am hoping for  the proposed
research project will be many folds the amount of money Enron would
contribute to the proposed effort.

I would be delighted to send you copies of the three papers and / or make a
brief presentation on the subject.

I wish to thank you for taking the time to read the above e-mail amid your
busy schedule.

Regards,

Hemmat Safwat
General Manager,
Development Engineering
Enron Middle East

I


Debbie,

Thank you for returning my call.  I went to the eRequest to submit a request
for Risktrac but the only option was to get access to the application.  I
already have the application I merely need access to the VAR module.
Therefore, I did not submit an eRequest.  Please let me know what I need to
submit to ensure I get the proper access.

Thank you,
Robin


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001 11:27 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           02/12/2001 07:26 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!

Look what this mean person made up about your school!
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 02/12/2001 07:26
AM ---------------------------

Christina Barthel@ENRON
02/12/2001 07:23 AM
To: Rafael Avila/NA/Enron, "Becky Bliss" <blbliss@hewitt.com>, Leon
Branom/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kim Chick/HOU/EES, Robert B
Cothran/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Anne Denley" <ADenley@vailresorts.com>, "jason
eggenburger" <jasonegg@hotmail.com>, Emily Ferguson/ENRON@enronXgate,
"Meredith" <meredith@friersoncpa.com>, Ryan Hinze/Corp/Enron, Shanna
Husser/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, "Toby Gouw" <tgouw@teamworks.ws>, Ben
Huxen/NA/Enron, "Juranek, Andrew A" <JuranAA@texaco.com>, Lynna
Kacal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, "Erin Landers" <elaggie99@hotmail.com>, "Jared
McDaniel" <jaredmcdaniel@hotmail.com>, "Anthony Moawad" <amoawad@kpmg.com>,
Chris Ochoa/NA/Enron, "Jaimie"<Jaimie_Parker@hotmail.com>, "Tracie Reed"
<traciereed99@hotmail.com>, "Brandon" <brandon.shimer@imgfinancialgroup.com>,
"Jose" <jose.a.suarez@us.pwcglobal.com>, Raul Yzquierdo/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!

From: "Kelly Kohrman" <pyrowoman@hotmail.com>
To: albert_ferrel@yahoo.com, ashbaylor@hotmail.com,
Ashley.Victorick@coastalcorp.com, aggie_guy21@yahoo.com,
CharlesPotterMail@yahoo.com, christina_ag99@hotmail.com, jadajot@yahoo.com,
jaf4678@neo.tamu.edu, j_a_garner@yahoo.com, laftamu@excite.com,
long@astrosfan.net, SLogan@TXLMortgage.com, AggieTia98@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Fwd: Fw: UT Fans - So True!
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 22:55:29

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - ut1.gif


Attached is a draft of the diesel swap definitions.  I am struggling with the concept of a mid-month tax increase.  Does it make any difference?  All comments welcome.  Walter


Title: Conference Call with OPEC'S President--Chakib Khelil, Minister of Energy and Mines of Algeria
URL(s):

http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2786;

http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2787;

***********************************************************************

GLOBAL ENERGY CONFERENCE CALL: THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 10:00am EST

We would like to announce a unique opportunity to participate in a CERA Global
Energy Conference Call with OPEC President Chakib Khelil on OPEC's current oil
market strategy. Mr. Khelil has offered to discuss OPEC's current position with
CERA clients, while major market decisions are being made.

* What is the impact of current OPEC decisions on world oil prices?
* Is OPEC's decision really conditional on non-OPEC participation? What level
of non-OPEC participation is deemed sufficient?
* Market share versus price defense strategy
* Supply and demand assessment for next year
* After September 11, is the 22/28 $ price band still relevant?

FORMAT
Our speakers will address these topics for 30 minutes.

SPEAKERS
* Chakib Khelil, Minister of Energy and Mines of Algeria, President of OPEC
* Daniel Yergin, Chairman, Cambridge Energy Research Associates
* Joseph A. Stanislaw, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cambridge Energy
Research Associates
* Vera de Ladoucette, Director, Middle East Research, Cambridge Energy Research
Associates

TIME
10:00 AM U.S. Eastern Time, Thursday, November 15, 2001; (4:00 PM Continental
European Time)

ELIGIBILITY
Clients eligible to participate in this conference call are those who subscribe
to CERA Advisory Services.

TO ENROLL
To enroll, please send a fax to Beth Vitiello at +1 617 441 6898, or enroll via
e-mail at bvitiello@cera.com, before 9:00 A.M., Thursday, November 15, 2001.
Please include your name, company, and telephone number with your
correspondence. Enrollment is not mandatory, but assists us in optimizing the
conference experience. If you are unable to pre-register, please follow the
above URL, click through to the Full Report, and follow the directions to
participate on the day of the call.

TO PARTICIPATE
Follow above URL and click through to the Full Report for instructions on how
to participate in the call (audio and Internet information).

**end**

E-mail Category: Conference Call Notification
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Global Energy, Global Oil

***********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
CERA's Autumn 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas
are now available at http://www20.cera.com/event
***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


SBX 5 (Sher) passed off of the Assembly Floor on a vote of 74-1.  This
is the newly amended $700 million comprehensive energy efficiency
measure.


eSource presents Lexis-Nexis training
Attend one of our Topical Lexis-Nexis Clinics:

Advanced
This session will cover advanced searching tips.  It will also cover using
Smart Indexing to narrow your search results.  Find out how to customize your
desktop for easier searching.

April 24   1:00 - 2:00 PM  EB564

Industry Research
Learn tips for finding industry information on Lexis-Nexis.  Find statistics
and other topics like market share, industry trends, and industry forecasts.
Explore industry information beyond the news.

April 24   2:30 - 3:30 PM   EB564

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
The cost is $25.00 Per Person
No Shows will be charged $50.00
* Please bring your Lexis-Nexis login ID and password. If you don't have one,
a guest ID will be provided.

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


John makes a good point about Bain

One of their senior partner recently wrote an article in the italian
largest financial newspaper where he provides (subjective) arguments
that none of the most recently developed  methodologies can be used
for valuing hith tech firms

Moreover (and surprisingly) he concludes by saying that "...the
value of an high tech firm is like the beauty at the lover's eyes"!!!

Alberto

> Date:          Thu, 27 Apr 2000 20:55:36 -0400
> From:          "John Mccormack" <jmccormack@sternstewart.com>
> To:            <gordonsick@mac.com>, <faizs@texaco.com>
> Cc:            <114463.3226@compuserve.com>, <vince.j.kaminski@enron.com>,
>                <jes9@mail.duke.edu>, <tomcopeland@monitor.com>,
>                <atriantis@rhsmith.umd.edu>, <lgc@roce-inc.com>,
>                <alberto.micalizzi@sda.uni-bocconi.it>, <jmatheson@sdg.com>,
>                <martha_amram@sdg.com>, <lenos@ucy.ac.cy>,
>                <adam.borison@us.pwcglobal.com>,
<gardner.walkup@us.pwcglobal.com>,
>                <timothy.luehrman@us.pwcglobal.com>
> Subject:       Re: Real Options - A Management fad? Economist Article

> I agree with Gordon. There are a couple other things to keep in mind. Bain
is a "strategy" firm with a very limited capacity to provide seriously
quantitative analysis. I doubt that they would have b>
> >>> "Gordon Sick" <gordonsick@mac.com> 04/26/00 10:55PM >>>
> Soussan,
>     The article is interesting but I have to wonder how serious the Bain
> study is. Most of the graphs of adoption rates look pretty flat to me, so I
> doubt that the results have much statistical significance. They had lots of
> management systems to ponder and only reported the most dramatic changes,
> and the changes aren't dramatic.
>     Moreover, real options differs from the other management systems in one
> very important respect: it is built upon an intellectually sound model that
> is designed to add value to corporations. The others are based more upon pop
> culture and don't have an intellectual basis.
>     Of course, academic integrity doesn't necessarily gain mind share or
> market share for real options. There is an important network effect and the
> large number of quality people working in the field has the effect of
> enhancing the mind share for real options. I think we are headed in the
> right direction--there is enormous interest in seminars and for consulting
> work. We'd all want more, but the trend is unmistakably in favour of real
> options.
>     Thus, I'd love to see the actual Bain study. I tried to log onto their
> site, but needed a password that I don't have.
>     Thanks for sending it.
> --cheers, Gordon
> ------------------
> Gordon Sick, Professor of Finance
> Faculty of Management, Scurfield Hall 150
> University of Calgary
> 2500 University Drive NW
> Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
> sick@ucalgary.ca
> Tel: +1 (403) 220-7165, Fax: +1 (403) 284-7903 (Calgary)
> Preferred fax: +1 (425) 732-1248 (US)
>
> Other activities:
> Book Review Editor Journal of Finance
>
> Course on Managing Not-for-Profit Organizations
> http://www.ucalgary.ca/~sick/cobra
>
>
> ----------
> >From: "Faiz, Soussan" <faizs@texaco.com>
> >To: "'114463.3226@compuserve.com'" <114463.3226@compuserve.com>,
> "'adam.borison@us.pwcglobal.com'" <adam.borison@us.pwcglobal.com>,
> "'alberto.micalizzi@sda.uni-bocconi.it'"
> <alberto.micalizzi@sda.uni-bocconi.it>, "'atriantis@rhsmith.umd.edu'"
> <atriantis@rhsmith.umd.edu>, "'gardner.walkup@us.pwcglobal.com'"
> <gardner.walkup@us.pwcglobal.com>, "'gordonsick@mac.com'"
> <gordonsick@mac.com>, "'jes9@mail.duke.edu'" <jes9@mail.duke.edu>,
> "'jmatheson@sdg.com'" <jmatheson@sdg.com>, "'jmccormack@sternstewart.com'"
> <jmccormack@sternstewart.com>, "'lenos@ucy.ac.cy'" <lenos@ucy.ac.cy>,
> "'lgc@roce-inc.com'" <lgc@roce-inc.com>, "'martha_amram@sdg.com'"
> <martha_amram@sdg.com>, "'timothy.luehrman@us.pwcglobal.com'"
> <timothy.luehrman@us.pwcglobal.com>, "'TomCopeland@monitor.com'"
> <TomCopeland@monitor.com>, "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'"
> <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> >Subject: Real Options - A Management fad?
> >Date: Tue, Apr 25, 2000, 12:59 PM
> >
>
> > Not sure whether you've come across the attached article in the latest
> > Economist?!
> >
> >  <<Fading_Fads.pdf>>
> > If the stated survey claim is true (and BTW I don't agree with their
> > definition of "real options analysis"), the "message" doesn't seem to be
> > getting across.  I personally don't think that ROA is a fad.  However, as
> > Tim Luehrman has stated, we have a major "language" and "practical
> > application" issue.
> >
> > I certainly encourage rectifying the "hopeless" message of this article by
> > proposing a "counter-point" article in The Economist.  In my view, ROA
isn't
> > everything, however, it provides a powerful nucleus for the creation,
> > protection, and delivery of value (Navigant - thanks for your focal
chart!).
> > We should also learn from the lessons of the other so-called "management
> > fads"!!
> >
> > Soussan Faiz
> > Texaco Inc.
> > (914) 253-4187
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Sally,
I've booked the company to do the 2-3rd August. If its OK with you, I'll get
some time in your diary to discuss with you who you want to attend this and
the structure and content of these days to see how we can maximise the value
from this session.

Tim

Patti - could you schedule me 30 minutes with Sally please early in w/c 7/17?
Thanks


Start Date: 3/7/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030723.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the
FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.


Roger - thanks for the review; we want to raise the "wholesale distribution"
concept

Jeff - we will rely on GA to identify our most successful forum (e.g.
workshop, hearing, other); generally we are in support of this proposed
decision as it establishes a CPUC/CEC commitment to address "behind the
meter" competition and the role of the UDC

Phil - we will require technical engineering experts for the workshops and
hearings

Greg
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Cordell/HOU/EES on 10/12/99 09:38 AM
---------------------------

Roger Yang
10/11/99 12:44 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: CPUC Draft Decision on Distributed Generation and Electric
Distribution Competition

Jeff,

The purpose of this e-mail is to reply to your e-mail to EESO requesting
input on the CPUC's draft decision on distributed generation and electric
distribution competition.  As you already know, EESO is very interested in
"behind the meter" competition including distributed generation, as well as
other competitive opportunities.  I understand that decision puts forth
procedures and identifies issues that need to be addressed for distributed
generation and electric distribution competition.  The decision does not
address an opinion on the issues identified; hence, I will not be providing
EESO's position on the issues.  The decision provides for testimony on issues
at a later point in time.  We will defer to Government Affairs expertise on
what are the most appropriate procedural steps.  I will limit my analysis to
identifying any issues that were not addressed by the decision.

The following is an outline of issues that I believe were identified by the
decision:

I. Retail Competition
 A. Wires Competition
  1. Distributed Generation/Distributed Energy Resources
   a. Interconnec tion (Workshop)
Definitions
Size Limitations
Voltage Level Interconnection options
Changes to Rule 21 for broader application, eliminating QF distinctions
"Type Testing"
Safety (Testimony)
Islanding (Workshop)
Statutory Amendments
b. Ownership an Operational Control (Staff Report)
Siting
Jurisdiction
UDC and affiliate ownership (Testimony)
c. Environmental Impacts
Air Quality
Visual Impacts
Noise Impacts
d. Rate Design and Cost Allocation
Cost Shifting
Stranded Investment (Testimony)
Bypass Fee (Testimony)
Standby Rates, including Firm v. Non-Firm (Testimony)
Flexible Rate Offering
e. Distribution System Planning Process (Workshop)
System Benefits
Reliability
Losses
Deferral of Distribution Investments
Relieve Constraints
DG  Distribution Valuation System (Testimony)
Additional costs
Impacts on PBR
f. Net Metering (Testimony)
Statutory Limitations
Rate bypass Issues
Public Purpose Programs
Consistency for all generation technology
g. Dispatch and Scheduling of Excess Generation (Workshop and Testimony)
Market Power
Must Run
Statutory clarification on what is a utility
Jurisdiction
h. Future Role of UDC (Testimony)
i. Distribution Service for Generators
Distribution-only Service (Testimony)
Jurisdiction (Testimony)
Unbundle Voltage Service Levels
j. Other
Impacts on California Air Resources Board
Emissions Credits
Impacts on Local Air Quality Districts
Local Governments
Building Codes & Permits
California Environmental Quality Act (Workshop)
2. Competition with Irrigation and Municipal Districts (Energy Division
Report)
 a. Local Government Franchises
 b. Stranded Costs
 c. Rate Flexibility
 d. Statutory Amendments for uniform construction, inspecition, reliability &
safety standards
 e. Obligation to serve
 f. Statutory Amendments for uniform Public Purpose Program requirements
 g. Local government tax advantages
3. Privatization of Distribution (Energy Division Report)
 a. Safety & Construction Standards
Interconnection
b. Uniform Standards
Jurisdiction
Legislative clarification
c. Obligation to Serve
d. Line Extension Rules
e. Public Purpose Program charge bypass
Alternate ways of funding
f. Wires only service unbundling
g. Rate Design
Bypass Charge
Standby
Rate Flexibility
Average Rate Structure
 h. Master-Meter & Submetering
Impact on construction costs
DSM cost effectiveness
Price Signals
Scale
Safety and Reliability
Impact on Direct Access Customer Choice
Cost Shifting
Legislative Amendments
Submetering Accuracy
Local Government Weights & Measures
Rates to submeter customers
4. Rights-of-Way Competition (Energy Division Report)
 a. Cooperation of Local Government
5. Independent Distribution Operator
 a. Pros/Cons
 b. Costs
 c. Use of ISO
 B. Energy Competition (Energy Division Report)
  1. Clear Separation of Monopoly & Competitive Services
   a. Cross-subsidies
  2. Provider of Last Resort v. Default Provider
   a. Competition for Default Provider Role
   b. Monopsony Market Power to influence market prices
   c. Mandarory PX Buy Requirement for Provider of Last Resort
   d. Economies of scale enjoyed fy the Default Provider
 C. Other (Energy Division Report)
  1. Social, Labor, and Economic Impacts
  2. DG Consumer Education

I believe this is  a fairly comprehensive list.  However, there are some
issues that I believe should either be identified or if already identified
better defined.  First, in the Energy Division's assessment of Energy
Competition and the clear separation of monopoly and competitive services,
the Energy Division should identify all of the assymetric rules,
responsibilities, and expectations placed upon ESPs compared to those of the
UDC default service provider.  For instance, hourly interval metering
requirements only apply to direct access customers and not to standard offer
customers.  Costs to fulfill regulatory requirements by the ESP are expected
to be recovered from market transactions; whereas, the utilities recover
these costs in non-competitive service rates.  These are examples of
competitive barriers that disadvantage ESPs.  Secondly, the decisions
reference to Standby Service on page 17 inappropriate implies that Standby
Service is only available from the UDC, when in fact ESPs can supply Standby
Generation Service as well.  The issue of Standby Service needs to unbundle
Standby T&D service from Standby Generation service, where these two issues
are looked at independently.  Third,  in addressing the Distributed
Generation issue of distribution service for excess generation the issue of
bidirectional distribution service needs to be more fully explored.  In other
words, if the customer is expected to pay for distribution service as a load,
some of the costs of distribution service for excess generation should be
offset by the payments already paid for distribution charges to the load.
Fourth, the issue of voltage service levels is in part addressed with respect
to interconnection.  Discounts for voltage service levels should be addressed
with respect to both loads and generation.  Finally, the issue of
interruptible service should also be addressed, because it is an unresolved
issue that is related to the issues above about distribution system benefits.

Roger


Please make this right.  Thanks,  Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000 02:18
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           10/10/2000 12:48 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

Kay,

This is the format for the land options that Robert Shaw of New Century is
using in Caledonia, MS.  Please advise if these documents are appropriate.

Thanks,

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 10/10/2000 12:42
PM ---------------------------

Mona Harvey <harveym@ncess.com> on 10/10/2000 11:20:08 AM
Please respond to "harveym@ncess.com" <harveym@ncess.com>
To: "Chris Booth (E-mail)" <Chris.Booth@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

Chris,
 Robert Shaw asked me to send these documents to you.

Please call either of us at 713-757-9771 if you need additional information.

Sincerely,
Mona Harvey

 - Easement - Caledonia Project (3-9-00).doc
 - Option to Purchase ROW-Caledonia Project (3-9-00).doc


Of course dude. Is Ern coming?

GT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [SMTP:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:30 AM
> To: gtownsend@manorisd.net
> Subject: Re:
>
>
> G,  Is it possible for me to crash at su casa on Sat. night?
>
>
>
>
>
>                     "Townsend,
>
>                     George"               To:     "'ernie zavaleta'"
> <ernie.j.zavaleta@fritolay.com>, "'gerald
>                     <gtownsend@man        nemec'" <gnemec@ect.enron.com>,
> "'jay dyer'" <jdyer@syncor.com>
>                     orisd.net>            cc:
>
>                                           Subject:
>
>                     02/09/2001
>
>                     09:58 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Fellas,
>
> My bachelor party is Saturday, Feb. 17th here in Austin. We will meet at
> my
> house at 4803 Marblehead 78727 at 6:30. The boys are renting a van and we
> have a driver that will take us around town. I hope you all are thirsty. I
> look forward to seeing you there.
>
> 512-496-3997 mobile or
> 512-821-3855 home
>
>
> GT
>
>


I certainly understand your anxiousness to get up to the dome for shrooms,
but I hope you can plan to be in Napa earlyish on Sunday for a little family
dinner.  I would really appreciate it.

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


More.........


Congratulations on your promotion!

Regards,

Eugenio


Attached is a responsibility matrix for London - Project Doorstep action
steps.  The listing consists of controls findings, action steps, proposed
timelines, and proposed sponsors and responsibility assignments for the
completion of the action steps.  The purpose of this matrix will be to review
and monitor it on an ongoing basis to ensure that items are being
appropriately addressed and completed.  Please take a moment to review all
sections of the listing and communicate any comments or revisions you may
have to me as soon as possible.  We would like to have a final version of
this document in place by May 12.


Herman/Billy,

This is still very early in the process, but some thought as to structure
options for earning recognition might be worthwhile.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/17/2001 09:17
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
05/16/2001 12:36 PM
To: William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Marks/ENRON@enronXgate, Janelle
Scheuer/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Re: NRG bullet points

I've made some revisions the Bill's document to make sure we are on the same
page before I prepare the LOI.

Do we want to give any sort of description of how the benchmark will be set?
Do we want to mention the cancellation provisions?

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Beck/HOU/EES on 05/18/2000 11:54 AM
---------------------------

"perfmgmt@ect.enron.com"<perfmgmt on 05/18/2000 11:03:19 AM
To: sbeck@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Mid-Year 2000 Performance Feedback

NOTE:  YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

You have been selected to participate in the Mid-Year 2000 Performance
Management process by providing meaningful feedback on specific employee(s)
that have been identified for you.  Your feedback plays an important role in
the performance management process, and your participation is very critical
to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

Please provide feedback on the employee(s) listed below by accessing the
Performance Management System (PEP) and completing an online feedback form as
described in the "Performance Management Quick Reference Guide".  You may
begin your feedback input immediately.  Please have all feedback forms
completed by the date noted below.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please call the PEP Help Desk at the following numbers:

In the U.S.:  1-713-853-4777, Option 4
In Europe:  44-207-783-4040, Option 4
In Canada:  1-403-974-6724 (Canada employees only)

Or e-mail your questions to:  perfmgmt@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following list of employees is a CUMULATIVE list of all feedback
requests, by operating company, that have an "OPEN" feedback status.  An
employee's name will no longer appear once you have completed the feedback
form and select the "SUBMIT" button in PEP.

Review Group: ENRON
Feedback Due Date: Jun 09, 2000

Employee Name                   Supervisor Name                 Date Selected
-------------                   ---------------                 -------------
CAMPOS, ANTHONY                 CONSTANCE L SUTTON              May 17, 2000
MELODICK, KIMBERLY A            CINDY L SKINNER                 May 15, 2000
VILLARREAL, NORMA E             CINDY L SKINNER                 May 15, 2000


FYI - response after my call to Brian.  Agreement refers to employees of Enron Americas or its subsidiaries, and those employees involved in natural gas specifically.  Enron Networks is not named, but is definitely an oversight because so much of the support for gas comes from Enron Networks.  Close date on the sale was May 31, 2001 - 12 month non-solicit period starts from that point.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Redmond, Brian
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:47 AM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	AEP HR

Sally - I asked Anne Koehler to give you a call - I think the non-solicit period is for one year.  The tricky bit is that we can't prevent our employees approaching AEP for  job ( or responding to AEP advertisements for a job).

Brian


Much obliged!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                12/12/2000 05:03 PM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: CAISO deals past April '02

How many times will I have to remind them? Mike Driscoll added comments on
both these deals - they would definitely like the special language added in
the confirm letter.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
12/12/2000 02:01 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: CAISO deals past April '02

Hi Kate!
I have two deals that extent past April 2002 (Deal #478879 & #478878).  The
traders didn't enter any comments about special CAISO language to be
entered.  Will you ask them if they want us to enter that language?
Thanks!
Kim


Please plan to attend the kick- off of the Process Leveraging and Reporting
teams, two of the seven teams that I introduced at the conference in San
Antonio.  This full-day meeting will begin at 8 am on Wednesday, October 18
at the Crown Plaza Hotel, 2222 West Loop South.  This is an important next
step in completing the SAP implementation and achieving the benefits that we
identified before Project Apollo and Beyond began.

The objectives of this meeting will be 1) to identify management's
information needs and priorities related to the accounting and reporting
processes and 2) to prioritize and focus the efforts of the Process
Leveraging and Reporting teams based on management's needs and priorities.
Therefore, it is very important for you to attend, to ensure that your BU's
needs and priorities are considered in these projects.  I realize that this
is a very busy time, but it will probably continue to be busy through yearend
close.  If we can get started as soon as possible, it is my hope that we can
complete the projects and see the results soon, possibly by the January close.

Attached is a list of questions and other information that you should
assemble and bring with you to the meeting so that we can make
better-informed decisions.  We will collect your completed information sheets
to use for further analysis and follow-up after the meeting.  If you have
questions in completing the pre-work items, please contact Jan Johnson at
x33260.

A preliminary agenda is also attached.   Please plan to attend the entire
day, as individual segments of the agenda will not make sense without full
participation

Please RSVP to Dortha Gray (x35903) by tomorrow at 2pm.  A continental
breakfast and buffet lunch will be provided.  If you are unable to attend,
let me know who will represent you.  Thanks for your help.


Thanks much Gerald.  Talk to you first thing in the a.m.

Stephanie
----- Original Message -----
From: <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
To: <Stephanie.Miller@enron.com>; <Peter.Keohane@enron.com>;
<hsmiller@msn.com>
Cc: <Steve.Van.Hooser@enron.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 9:08 PM
Subject: Calpine Capacity Assignment Docs.

> Attached for your review are drafts of the Capacity Assignment and Release
> Agreement and the Transaction No. 1 attached to the Master Firm Purchase
> Sale Enfolio.
>
> Peter,  any input you would have on Article 3 of the Assignment Agreement
> would be greatly appreciated.  Stephanie is trying to get these out as
soon
> as possible tomorrow.
>
> (See attached file: Calpine Confirm.doc)(See attached file:
> CalpineAssignRelease.doc)


FYI - Shell Meters for march 2001.

AL
---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 09:47
AM ---------------------------

Mary Poorman@ENRON
02/22/2001 10:12 AM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: March Nominations at Shell Deer Park

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Poorman/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 10:12
AM ---------------------------

"Shankster JL (Luther)" <JLShankster@equiva.com> on 02/22/2001 10:07:34 AM
To: "'Lamphier, Gary'" <glamphi@enron.com>
cc: "Carter, John" <JCCarter@equiva.com>, "Ricks, Ruth"
<RARicks@equiva.com>, kyle.r.lilly@enron.com, mary.poorman@enron.com

Subject: March Nominations at Shell Deer Park

Gary,

March 2001 nominations for gas delivery to Shell Deer Park are as follows:

Firm Baseload - 75,000 MMBtu/d
Spot Swing supply - 0 (zero)

Delivery of the above contract quantities is expected to be as follows:

  HPL-HP   HPL-E   HPL-S
 Firm 15,000 MMBtu/d 25,000 MMBtu/d 35,000 MMBtu/d

Turnaround activity started in January is expected to be completed in the
second half of March.

Please let me know if you have any questions

J. Luther Shankster

Energy & Utilities Planning
> Phone: 713/277-9307
> Fax: 713/277-9941
> E-Mail: jlshankster@equiva.com
> Home Page: http://rsweb
>


http://www.apbenergy.com/

Okay...so here's the link.  Once you get to the sight, click on About APB and then Just for Fun.  Once you're on the Just for Fun page click on Derby 2001 and go to the last picture on the first row.  You can read the names from there.

Hope the first day at the new office is going well.  Give me a call sometime and let me know what the scoop is regarding Wednesday and the baseball game.  I'm anxious to hear if you talked to Leslie again after the cryptic phone call on Saturday.

Sue

btw....not only no contact, but not said individual's not even logging into messenger...I think this where people tend to say "stick a fork in it."


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 05:59 PM
---------------------------

Dave Kellermeyer
10/20/2000 05:54 PM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: DPL- wheatland

Here's the updated file.


jeff,

Is the problem that the energy DWR purchased is above market and not needed
by CORE  or  just above market.  If the energy is needed by CORE wouldn't the
deals just be blended in as costs like utility gen and QF supply?  If the
energy is not needed now could the state sell back the excess then compute
the exact loss and put a surcharge on rates for all or some customers that
recoup that amount over time.  Once again there would be a CTC type recovery
period but there would not be the risk that the market price must stay below
a fixed price for the stranded costs to be recovered.

Phillip
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Steffes, James; Shapiro, Richard;
skean@enron.com; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Allen, Phillip K.; Yoder,
Christian; Hall, Steve C.
Subject: Call to Discuss Possible Options to Mitigate Effect of DWR
Contracts--Privileged and Confidential
Sensitivity: Confidential

PLEASE KEEP THIS NOTE, AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE NOTE CONFIDENTIAL.

As folks are aware, we have been engaged in closed-door negotiations for the
past two weeks regarding a possible market-based solution to California's
electricity crisis.
In the room are the major large customer groups, environmentalists, small
customers (TURN), Independent Energy Producers, labor, the Western States
Petroleum Association, and Enron.
The negotiations were convened by the Speaker of the Assembly (Bob Hertzberg).
When Hertzberg convened the meeting, he told the parties that he wanted to
achieve a core/noncore structure, similar to the structure in place in
California's gas market (i.e., large customers are required to buy gas from
the market, with Direct Access available to all other customers).
In effect, "core" customers (rez and small business) would be served by the
utilities' retained generating assets and QF contracts; and large customers
would go to market.
The core/noncore structure would begin 1.1.03.
The negotiating group has struggled over the past two weeks, but is close
devising a framework for core/noncore in Californis (but who pays for the
utilities' past debts and the costs of DWR power purchased between January
and today remain very contentious).
Unfortunately, with the release of the information regarding the DWR
contracts last Friday, it is now clear that achieving a core/noncore
structure will be very difficult unless something is done to mitigate the
contracts.
The problem is that, if core is served by utility gen and QFs, and large
customers are in the market, there is no (or very little) need for the DWR
contracts.  Instead, they look like a signficant stranded cost.
Hertzberg and the negotiating group are looking to Enron for creative ways to
address "the DWR contract problem" in order to prevent the contracts from 1)
killing the core/noncore deal and 2) forcing California to accept a structure
focused on a state power authority headed-up by David Freeman that does not
include Direct Access.
Christian Yoder and Steve Hall are reviewing the contracts to analyze any
"out clauses" that the buyer and/or the seller might have under the contract
provisions.  (My cursory review of the contracts suggests that "outs" for the
state are minimal or nonexistent.)
In addition, we've started batting around ideas about how the State might
reform the contracts.
All this said, want to let everyone know that we have made it extremely clear
that Enron fundamentally opposes any and all attempts to unilaterally
abrogate anyone's contract rights.

We'd like to have a quick call tomorrow (30-60 minutes) to brainstorm some
options that we can offer Hertzberg to handle the contracts and keep the
core/noncore solution alive.  We'd like to try to have the the call at 1 PM
PDT.  Please let me know if this works for you, and if it doesn't, please let
me know if there's a time after 1 PM PDT that works for you.

Thanks,
Jeff


It is an absolutely hilarious video of a pakistani man firing a shotgun in a
range and the gun shooting out of his hand and him yelling at his friends.
Real player should be able to play it - that is what I used.

I had a good time.  Send me those pics.  It was great seeing everybody and
give us a shout the next time you are in town.
PL

"Catherine Liller" <catherine.liller@lcra.org> on 10/11/2000 11:19:15 AM
To: <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Can you help my buddy, he's looking to get on a deer lease
AS AP

What is it?  I couldnt open it.  What application is it in?
What did you think of the reunion?  Have fun?
Liz sent me a bunch of pics through email.  Mainly "our gang" and others.
Want to see em?
-Catherine


I think these will be just fine.

Ds
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Temp file until the IT group completes the Internet version.


My comments marked on the attached.


The STCA desk will be short 75 MW on peak at NP-15 on 1/4. This is due to two
sales involving the STNW desk and one involving LTWM which have been zeroed
out in scheduling but not in EnPower. All three are for 25 MW on peak.

Thanks,
Kate


This is not good news. As you know, this financing was very important in
helping to solve the liquidity problem. John did tell me that they had good
meetings with the Embassy this week. My experience with OPIC tells me that
with a change in administration in Washington and the concerns John mentions
in his memo, we should not count on the financing. Thanks, Joe
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/14/2000 04:30 PM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  John Hardy                           09/14/2000 02:40 PM

To: Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Update on Azurix - Buenos Aires water project

Joe
 As an update to my earlier email on the Azurix water project, Azurix has
suspended OPIC's consideration of the project until either we are able to get
a more positive cable out of the US Embassy in Argentina or George moves on -
probably in late January.
 But the OPIC pullback together with the publicity about Rebecca's departure
has caused serious concern on the part of IDB which is now pulling back.  The
IDB has made it clear that they are concerned about Enron's intentions
regarding Azurix.  I have talked to Azurix about seeking some statement of
support from Enron so that we can address this issue head on.  You may well
be getting some communication from John Garrison on this issue.  If we can
get back on track Azurix may be able to get IDB Board approval this fall.
 Hope you are well.  thanks John


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Shelby Kelley" <skelley@bracepatt.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Shelby+20Kelley+22+20+3Cskelley+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:18 PM
To:	carmen.cintron@ferc.fed.us
Cc:	cgastillo@ferc.fed.us; janet.jones@ferc.fed.us
Subject:	EL01-10 Letter to Judge Cintron

Your Honor:

Attached please find a letter from Enron Power Marketing Inc. and Enron Energy Services, Inc. regarding its data submissions.

Respectfully submitted,

Jeffrey D. Watkiss

Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
2000 K Street, NW  Suite 500
Washington, DC 20006-1872

 - Letter to Judge Cintron.doc


Mark,

I am sending you the final (?) draft of the paper by John Martin
on Enron's transformation. John Martin is a prof from Baylor who visited us
a few weeks ago.

Can you take a look at the paper and bless it. I haven't read this last
version
of the paper yet and I will go through it on weekend.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001
08:44 AM ---------------------------

"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 02/01/2001 04:15:36 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: The latest (last?)

Vince,

Attached is my latest attempt to wrap everything together.  Our timetable
is very short as we need an "approved by Enron" version of the paper to Don
by next Wednesday.  Don has already made editorial changes for us and may
make some additional "writing style" changes but he doesn't change the
content.

I'll give you a call later today to alert you to the e-mail.

take care,

john

p.s. i had a nice conversation with steve.  sounds like he's landed a
pretty good contract with Wiley.

 - Enron_Paper_2_1_01.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


As Mike and I look across all of our business units, we continue to look for
optimal organizational structures that will enable each business unit to
achieve it's targets for  2001 and beyond.  In our weather business, there
appears to be a lack of seamlessness.  Reporting relationships, P&L, and
vision for this business are not best aligned as this business exists today.

Mike and I would like to address this as follows:    we need 100% full time
dedication from each and any employee that is dedicated to the weather
business.  All identified employees in the weather business will now become
full time employees of EGM and report to Mark Tawney. Accordingly Mark and I
will be looking at, with each of you, the employees that may be affected by
this transition and the need to hire additional employees.  It is important
that both business units work together to determine which individuals will be
in Weather, or  will be in EEL.  Once done, Mark will begin adding to the
weather team in each of your regions.   It is obvious that the organizations
and product lines can lever each other and the synergy's will provide
powerful results in our regional gas and power businesses in particular.

If you look at coal, lng, equities, etc, we have employees based in each of
your regions who report back into the appropriate business unit within EGM.
This restructure will similarly align weather.

Please give me a call and we will discuss the issues surrounding this new
structure.


Per Paul...

 <<ENRON.ML.Assignment.11.13.00.revised.doc>>

Phil Franz
Transaction Management/Equity Derivatives
Lehman Brothers
(212)526-8482
pfranz@lehman.com
> This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review,
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and
> should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an
> offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any
> transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers Inc., its
> subsidiaries or affiliates.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
> secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this
> information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as
> such.  All information is subject to change without notice.
>

 - ENRON.ML.Assignment.11.13.00.revised.doc


I would like to request information and application materials for your
advanced studies program in Bologna, Italy, as well as for Master's Degree
study in international relations at Johns Hopkins University. I am interested
in applying for the academic year of 2002-2003, but I'd like to gather all
the necessary information as soon as possible.

Thank you,

Kate Symes
2505 NE 32nd Place
Portland, OR 97212


Attached is a list of deals.  Per Ed Sacks, the NIMO deals should be terminated.  I have not received a recent list of terminations since I returned so I'm sending this individually.

Thanks.  My holidays were quiet and restful.  Hope yours were great.

-----Original Message-----
From: Evans, Casey
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:12 PM
To: Denton, Rhonda L.
Subject: RE: Niagara Mohawk

thank you, madam!!  Hope you had a great Christmas!

-----Original Message-----
From: Denton, Rhonda L.
Sent: Wed 12/26/2001 4:55 PM
To: Evans, Casey; Dahlke, Andrea
Cc: Murphy, Melissa Ann
Subject: Niagara Mohawk

I have documentation showing that Select Energy Acquired Niagara Mohawk Energy Marketing through a stock purchase agreement effective 11/30/01 and that they terminated Niagara's Master Energy Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 6/23/97 effective 12/2/01.  I do not show that Select canceled their agreement with EPMI, and there are outstanding physical deals with them.  I will let you know as soon as I find out from Ed Sacks in credit if we should terminate the NIMO deals where they stand or move them to Select and then terminate.


[IMAGE][IMAGE]

Dear  Amazon Customer,

At the risk  of sounding like a mom, we must say it's been a while since you
paid us a  visit (and shopped using this address). But we have the perfect
reason to  come see us again--our  Mother's  Day Store. Discover great gifts
for all the special moms in your  life, along with extra savings for you
(such as free shipping on Kitchen &  Housewares orders of $99 or more).

Shop by  price or by interest--whether you're buying for a gardener or a
gourmet  cook, a professional or a homebody, you're sure to find that
perfect,  personal gift. Or, for the mom who truly has everything, let her
choose--send a fun e-card with an  Amazon.com  gift certificate.

 Let all  the moms in your life know just how much you appreciate them, and
check out  our  Mother's  Day Store today. (And don't be such a stranger next
time, OK?)

Sincerely,
[IMAGE]
David Risher
Senior Vice President
Amazon.com

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

Pick  by Price
??Under  $10
??Under  $25
??Under  $50
Is  Your Mom...
??Stressed  Out
??One  Who  Has
?  ?It  All
??A  Gardener
??A  Grandmother
For  the Mom Who...
??Loves  Flowers
??Loves  Cooking
??Loves  Crafts

[IMAGE]

All Products Books Music DVD VHS Toys Video Games  Electronics Software
Outdoor  Living Kitchen Outlet Auctions zShops

[IMAGE]
PS:  Don't tell my wife (and the mother of our two darling girls), but I've
already picked up a copy of the gift book  Hollywood  Moms, filled with
photos of famous mothers and daughters. A  portion of the proceeds even
benefits breast and ovarian cancer  research.
?
?
?
?

We hope you  enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not
receive future  e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit your
Amazon.com  account page. Under the Your Account Settings heading, click the
"Update your communication preferences" link.

Please note  this e-mail was sent to the following address:
pkeavey@ect.enron.com


Seasons Greetings!

You are Invited to Attend A Holiday Lunch

Date:  Wednesday, December 13, 2000

Time:  11:45am (Let the Celebration Begin!)

Location: Brennan's Restaurant

Please mark your calendars for this joyous occasion.  If you are unable to
attend, please let me know so that I may have a firm count for our
reservations.

HAPPY HOLIDAYS


Folks:  Let me know if this captures the results of the conversation on
Friday.

Best,
Jeff
******************************************************************************
*********************************************
Basics of Proposal
Something akin to the MOU (that adequately addresses the solvency issue, for
the IOUs, the State and QFs), but WITHOUT the transmission component
Direct Access for ALL customers, transitioning to a core/noncore market
structure in 18-24 months (this can be accomplished without stranding CDWR's
contracts)
Concessions
 -IOUs (MOU modifications)
 -Generators (past due amounts)
 -investigations
Package to finance the deal (bond issuance backed by rate increases to permit
securitization)

Message
This is the last best chance to achieve a comprehensive settlement
We have developed a comprehensive solution and are meeting with everyone that
will see us.
We have thus far received positive feedback on and a willingness to work with
our proposal
We intend to work tirelelessly to gain support for a total solution---it's
vital, and time's running out

Media Strategy---Karen Denne

Corporate leader strategy---Karen Denne

Meetings with legislators in Sacramento---Sandi McCubbin

WPTF, IEP, ARM---Sue Mara

Large customers---Jeff Dasovich


okay by me


Bus passes for January are now available at the Parking and Transportation office on the third floor of the Enron Building, ECN 306.  These passes are offered on a monthly basis and are provided at no charge to the Enron employee. However, because these buses passes are fully subsidized they must be treated as "taxable" income. Excluding the first $65 of the bus pass, the remaining value is subject to taxation, collectively referred to as "imputed tax". See example below

Example: A $100 pass is chosen by an employee.

Subsidy for Bus Pass		$100.00
Exclusion amount			$  65.00

Taxable Income amount		$  35.00


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: NGstockspricetime.pdf)(See attached file:
NGscatterdeviation.pdf)
 - NGstockspricetime.pdf
 - NGscatterdeviation.pdf


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

November 2, 2001 5:00pm through November 5, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

EES:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 11/2/2001 at  5:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 11/2/2001 at  6:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 11/2/2001 at  3:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 11/2/2001 at  4:30:00 PM PT
	Fri 11/2/2001 at  11:30:00 PM London thru Sat 11/3/2001 at  12:30:00 AM London
Outage:  ENEFW5-F replacement
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: current PIX is unreliable
Backout: revert back to original hardware
Contact(s): 	Chris Trota    713-345-1697

MESSAGING:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:
Time:  Sun 11/4/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/4/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT
	Sun 11/4/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/4/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT
	Mon 11/5/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London thru Mon 11/5/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Maintenance scheduled for CMS and Voicemail
Environments Impacted:
Purpose: The maintenance was not supposed to be scheduled until next weekend, but with the 2 large move to ECS, we have been asked to do them this weekend. With all of the broadcast messages going out, we do not want to wait 3 weeks before we can do a our maintenance routine.
Backout:
Contact(s): 	Kathy Link    713-345-5418

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


AUSTIN AT THE CAPITOL
701 EAST 11TH STREET
AUSTIN, TX  78701
tel: 512-478-1111
fax: 512-478-3700

Hotel Information: http://marriotthotels.com/AUSDT

ARRIVAL CONFIRMATION:
 Confirmation Number:83929275
Guests in Room: 3
NAME: MR ERIC  BASS
Guest Phone: 7138530977
Number of Rooms:1
Arrive: Sep 7 2001
Depart: Sep 8 2001
Room Type: ROOM - QUALITY
Guarantee Method:
 Credit card guarantee

RATE INFORMATION:
Rate(s) Quoted in: US DOLLAR
Arrival Date: Sep 7 2001
Room Rate: 129.00  per night. Plus tax when applicable
Rate Program: LEISURE RATE

SPECIAL REQUEST:
 NON-SMOKING ROOM, GUARANTEED
 2 DOUBLE BEDS, GUARANTEED
 HIGH FLOOR, REQUEST NOTED

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
Any Inquiries Please call 1-800-228-9290 or your local
international toll free number.

Confirmation Sent: Mon Jul 30 15:45:05 2001

Legal Disclaimer:
This confirmation notice has been transmitted to you by electronic
mail for your convenience. Marriott's record of this confirmation
notice is the official record of this reservation. Subsequent
alterations to this electronic message after its transmission
will be disregarded.

Marriott is pleased to announce that High Speed Internet Access is
being rolled out in all Marriott hotel brands around the world.
To learn more or to find out whether your hotel has the service
available, please visit Marriott.com.

Earn points toward free vacations, or frequent flyer miles
for every stay you make!? Just provide your Marriott Rewards
membership number at check in.? Not yet a member?? Join for free at
https://member.marriottrewards.com/Enrollments/enroll.asp?source=MCRE


Attached please find the  power credit watchlist dated 04/9/01.  Please
direct any comments/questions to the credit hotline, (713) 853-1803

Please note that the following changes have been made to the watchlist:
 Alliant Energy Coporate Services, Inc. - Physical Call for Approval  - 6
Months
 Ameren Services Company - Physical & Finanical NO TRADES
 California Power Exchange Corporation - Physical & Financial NO TRADES
 Pacific Gas & Electric Company - Physical & Financial NO TRADES

Veronica Gonzalez