----------
From: Clubmonkey Events <info@clubmonkey.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 14:36:04 -0500
To: Undisclosed-
Recipient@UNKNOWN,MISSING_MAILBOX_TERMINATOR@.SYNTAX-
ERROR.,UNEXPECTED_DATA_AFTER_ADDRESS@.SYNTAX-ERROR.
Subject: Halloween Tickets 1 Day Left!!

ONLY 1 DAY LEFT to get your VIP - No Line/No Wait
Pimp & Prostitute Ball
tickets!!!!  Get them now!!  On-Line ordering will
close at Midnight Friday..
After that you will have to get your non-VIP tickets
at the door for $15..

~10.27.01
5th Annual Pimp & Prostitute Ball..don't be fooled by
imitations!
Saturday, October 27th, 2001
Round up yo bitches and grab yo gold. Wrap some
fishnets around that fly booty,
cuz it be time to go out and pimp an ho it!
Starting at 7pm. Come on out to R&R Lounge 3512 Main.
Tickets are $10 for
advance VIP tickets and $15 at the door, but for a
high priced Ho or a Pimp that
aint nuthin for all these details:
CLICK for complete details:
http://www.clubmonkey.com/Events/10272001.asp
Part of the proceeds will benefit Texas Adaptive
Aquatics, so come help benefit
an awesome cause!

~10.31.2001
Halloween Night @ The Outback Pub(3100 Fountainview)
and it's Big Ass Beer Night
Come out for Green Beer and a $1000 costume contest
(cash & prizes)
Liquid Sand playing Live!!!  Bring your Big Ass Beer
glass!

~11.03.2001
Blowout Brothers Fall Roundup 2001
Saturday Nov. 3, 2001 @
Garden in the Heights(3926 Feagan)
$12 at door includes beer & wine

~11.16.01
Clubmonkey Sports Happy Hour @ BW-3(2525 Rice Blvd.)
weblink:  http://www.clubmonkey.com/Events/bw-
311162001.asp
Time: 6-10pm Cost: $10 at the door, Includes Our
Favorite Beer and TWO
complimentary cocktails.
Free drinks, ..sign up to play in your favorite
sports!!!

~11.17.2001
Clubmonkey Open Golf Tournament
Saturday Nov. 17th 12:30pm shotgun start
@ Sienna Plantation
Scramble Format - Teams of 4
weblink:
http://www.clubmonkey.com/Events/clubmonkeyopen.asp

ALL NEW PHOTOS
Over 1000 new photos now loaded on the Clubmonkey
Photo Center!!!
just goto
http://www.clubmonkey.com/Houston/photocenter.asp

------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Check out www.clubmonkey.com for all the
happening Houston nightlife details!

For more info on anything just reply to this message
Also to be removed from this mailing list please
reply to this message
with the word "REMOVE" in the subject line.


Alan and Richard, FYI re the FGPC/ECT contract.  John Lockey is a barrister
(an actual trial advocate) that David asked to help him given the urgency and
complexity of this dispute.  Deborah, please print out and file.

     B.K.D.
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 08/03/2000 10:54 AM -----

	Julie.Bertschin@clyde.co.uk
	08/03/2000 10:20 AM

		 To: Matthias.lee@enron.com
		 cc: britt.davis@enron.com, ngregson@wfw.com
		 Subject: m/v PACIFIC VIRGO

From David Best.

Following our telephone conference this morning, the following advice can be
given.  Please treat this advice as the joint advice of myself and Counsel
John
Lockey.  We give it in bullet form for the purposes of clarity.

1.   The terms of the ASTM D3605 do support the view that it is inappropriate
to
apply D3605 to condensate.  The fact remains, however, that the contract
defines
the contractual specification by reference to D3605.  On the face of it, Enron
has promised a specification in accordance with test method D3605 and has
agreed
to assume the risk tht the condensate does not satisfy the specification when
tested in accordance with D3605.

2.   The terms of Appendix 1 to the 1997 Fuel Supply Plan seem to us to make
it
much more difficult to argue that the reference in Appendix B of the contract
fo
D3605 means only that D3605 applies to condensate to the extent that it is
appropriate to use D3605 for condensate.  The fact that Enron reported test
results for condensate in Appendix 1 to the 1997 Fuel Supply Plan by reference
simply to test method D3605 makes it very difficult to argue that when the
parties concluded the contract, they would have had in mind that D3605 applies
only to gasoil and would not apply (or would only apply with modifications) to
condensate.

3.   The terms of the Fuel Supply Plan,and of Appendix 1, make it even more
difficult to argue that the impossibility of finding a seller who is willing
to
sell condensate applying test method D3605 satisfies the test of using
reasonable commercial efforts.  Even though Enron is not contractually
committed
to the terms of the Fuel Supply Contract, the fact is that Enron put forward
typical specifications for condensate by reference to D3605.  The Fuel Supply
Plan re-emphasises the importance to the buyer of being provided with
condensate
in preference to naptha or gasoil.

4.   Our understanding of SGS' advice to Enron is that D3605 does not envisage
ashing, and that it would be wrong to report a result by reference to test
method D3605 if the sample had been ashed before testing.

5.   Should SGS provide a test certificate certifying a specification which is
outside contractual specification applying D3605with a notation that
condensate
falls outside the scope of D3605, (as they suggest), the buyers will still be
able to reject because any verification is final, conclusive and binding on
the
parties, provided there is no manifest error.

6.   If it is the case that applying D3605 (without any modifications to the
ASTM methodology) to portions of the sample condensate provided to the
independent inspector would (or may well) produce different results (in ppm)
for
the same sample because of the volatility of condensate, it seems to us to be
strongly arguable that the independent inspector (aware that his certification
of non-compliance will be binding under the contract) should simply refuse to
certify a test result by reference to D3605.  It seems to us to be difficult
in
those circumstances for the inspector to conclude that a particular test
result
is reliable.  (Furthermore, if it is the case that it is not practically
possible to certify quantities of elements below 0.5ppm using D3605 on
condensate, then again the independent inspector should refuse to certify at
those levels).

7.   If the independent inspector refuses to certify by reference to D3605,
the
buyer will have to decide whether to reject and take his chances of
demonstrating that in fact the condensate was off-spec by reference to D3605.
(The absence of a certificate of compliance with specification does not seem
to
us to justify rejection).  If the buyer decides to reject, an arbitrator would
have to decide on all the evidence whether the cargo was off-spec as measured
by
D3605.  The buyer would be running the risk that he could not justify the
rejection, with a potential exposure to Enron's costs.  It would be prudent in
those circumstances for Enron to have commissioned a number of tests using
D3605
methodology in order to present an average (and hopefully on-spec) result to
counteract the test results produced by the buyer.  It would also be prudent
in
those circumstances for Enron to have commissioned a number of tests using
SGS'
preferred method of testing condensate, as these results could be used by
Enron
to require the buyer to take a rejected cargo in mitigation of the buyer's
loss
or to submit to the arbitrators that the buyer should have mitigated by
accepting re-tender of the rejected cargo when accompanied by an independent
inspector's certification that the specs were met by reference to the much
more
appropriate methods for testing.

8.   Contractually, it is almost certainly not open to Enron to refuse to
agree
on the appointment of an independent inspector, or to insist that the
independent inspector should not test the sample of condensate using method
D3605 unless there are modifications to that method when applied to
condensate.
However, there does not appear to be any objection to Enron advising in
advance
that because the independent inspector's certificate is intended to be binding
under the contract, the independent inspector should not provide a result by
reference to D3605 unless satisfied that that result is truly representative
of
the qualities of the sample.

9.   Turning to Enron's exposure to a tax liability on the nomination and
shipment of gasoil we repeat our advice given in our e mail of 2nd August that
it is not possible for Enron to argue with any realistic prospect of success
that the apparent impossibility of finding a seller who is willing to sell
condensate applying test method D3605 satisfies the test of using reasonable
commercial efforts to justify zero tax.  It seems to us that this provision is
designed to deal with problems of obtaining condensate cargoes due to force
majeure related reasons after the contract has been entered into.  The onus is
on Enron to demonstrate that it has used reasonable commercial efforts.  It is
likely in our view that FGCP will set off against price a sum equivalent to
the
tax liability so that Enron is out of pocket with the regard to the nominated
gasoil.

10.  Unless Enron wishes to manage the contract by risking a rejection dispute
each time condensate is delivered (assuming SGS do not certify) Enron may want
try to renegotiate the contract.  It may be that the point we have raised in 7
concerning the risk of an unlawful rejection by the buyer may be helpful in
any
such renegotiation.

Regards

David Best

PLEASE REPLY TO: david.best@clyde.co.uk

__________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
Any views or opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the author and
do not necessarily represent those of Clyde & Co.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please contact Clyde & Co.

Clyde & Co.
51 Eastcheap, London, EC3M 1JP
Tel: +44 (020) 7623 1244, Fax: +44 (020) 7623 5427

Clyde & Co. Guildford
Beaufort House, Chertsey Street, Guildford GU1 4HA
Tel: +44 1483 555 555, Fax: +44 1483 567 330

E-Mail: postmaster@clyde.co.uk, Internet: http://www.clydeco.com


Yes, please delete.  Now we have just canceled the one for tomorrow.  The
next scheduled budget mtg will be on Tuesday, May 15 @ 11:00 a.m.

Liz

   Barbara Hooks @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT                05/07/2001 11:31 AM

To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EWS Budget Mtg @ 11:00a.m. in EB32C2

Liz, I have a budget meeting scheduled for this Thursday at 11am.  Is this
the same thing?  Should I delete the Thursday meeting from Keith's calendar?
Please advise.  Thanks!

Barbara Hooks
Enron Engineering & Operational Services
713-345-5100

	Greg Whalley@ECT
	Sent by: Liz M Taylor@ECT
	05/07/2001 11:22 AM

		 To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Brian
Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON, Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca
McDonald/Enron@EnronXGate, James A Hughes/Enron@EnronXGate, Philippe A
Bibi/Enron@EnronXGate, Greg Piper/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffrey
McMahon/Enron@EnronXGate, Raymond Bowen/enron@enronxgate, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/Enron@EnronXGate, John J
Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes
Colwell/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Faith Killen/Enron@EnronXGate, Loretta
Brelsford/Enron@EnronXGate, Connie Blackwood/Enron@EnronXGate, Peggy
McCurley/Enron@EnronXGate, Tina Spiller/Enron@EnronXGate, Sue
Ford/Enron@EnronXGate, Marsha Schiller/Enron@EnronXGate, Cathy
Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Burns/Enron@EnronXGate, Kimberly
Hillis/Enron@EnronXGate, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara
Hooks/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Rachael Venable/NA/Enron@Enron,
Shirley Tijerina/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: EWS Budget Mtg @ 11:00a.m. in EB32C2

   EWS Budget Meeting.

  Date:   May 8, 2001

  Time:   11:00 a.m.

  Location:  EB32C2

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor


Looks pretty empty so far.

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/21/2000 01:07:53 PM
To: " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>, " -
*Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Dalphon, Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Kinney,
Doug" <BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Flewellyn, Melissa"
<mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject:

Here are the COH storage contract volumes on TCO for
2000/2001.
                                        Summer                    Winter


SK - I printed these out and put them in your mail folder.  mm

Terry asked me to email these attachments to each of you.  One is an
organizational chart for his department and
the other is a Global Affairs Activities Matrix.


Thanks to all of you, Enron North America has had an outstanding year in
2000.  Some of the more notable accomplishments include:
a) 100% plus increase in EBIT from 1999 actuals to 2000 forecast;
b) significant rationalization of the balance sheet including the sale of the
(i) Wind River/Powder River gathering assets, (ii) East Coast Power
generating assets, (iii) HPL and (iv) five of the six Eastern Peakers;
c) ENA is the leading energy merchant by a factor of two;
d) physical electricity volume grew by 34% YTD 1999 to YTD 2000 forecast;
e) natural gas volumes grew by 82% YTD 1999 to YTD 2000 forecast;
f) 500% growth in daily transactions from November 1999 to November 2000 due
to the highly successful Enron OnLine distribution channel; and
g) ENA reaching its 25% ROCE target.

These are truly outstanding accomplishments and our expectations for growth
and opportunity in Enron North America for 2001 are consistent with that
success.  In order to reach these goals, we felt it necessary to re-align a
number of our organizations. A number of these changes are completed.  The
goals of such re-alignment include:
a) increase overall productivity with the goal to ensure that every employee
is in a position to contribute regardless of skill set;
b) increase overall market coverage, deal flow and information generation
with the goal to increase bid/offer income, increase the velocity of deal
flow, improve customer coverage and promote quality information transfer to
our trading organization;
c) increase deal quality and earnings quality with the goal to (i) allocate
our resources towards the best transactions and (ii) significantly increase
our &mid-market8 originated transactions in our portfolio;
d) promote real time decision making and a closer tie between our trading and
origination (mid-market and structured) organizations in order to better
align those functions to reduce the amount of un-productive internal focus;
e) increase the overall velocity of the capital being utilized consistent
with our goal of a 25% plus return on capital employed; and
f) identify and recognize a host of new leaders in the organization that are
critical to meeting our goals next year.

With these objectives in mind, patterned after the successful business models
in Calgary and Portland, effective immediately the following changes are
being implemented:
a) East Power ) a single East Power Team incorporating trading, mid-market
and origination will be formed under the co-leadership of Kevin Presto and
Janet Dietrich who will report to the Enron Americas - Office of the Chairman
(EA OOC).  This team will have one income statement, one book and a joint
accountability. However, a clear delineation of responsibilities inside these
teams will continue to exist in which the trading organization will manage
the risk, income statement and product development aspects of the
partnership. The originators will have the primary responsibility to generate
origination income, provide coverage, deal flow, lead strategy formulation,
provide information and generate strategic positions.  Overall, the team will
be rewarded based upon increasing the value of the book, meeting
coverage/deal flow targets and meeting its strategic/growth goals in the
Eastern power markets. The team will be responsible for covering the IOU,s,
muni,s/co-ops, industrials and IPP,s and will utilize all ENA,s product
capabilities including the power commodity, assets and capital. The team will
further be broken down into several key strategic regions and business units
including:
  (i) ERCOT ) managed by Doug Gilbert Smith and Bruce Sukaly;
  (ii) NE ) managed by Dana Davis and Jeff Ader;
  (iii) Midwest ) managed by Fletch Sturm and Ed Baughman;
  (iv) SE ) managed by Rogers Herndon and Ozzie Pagan;
  (v) East Power Development ) managed by Ben Jacoby;
  (vi) East Power Structuring  - managed by Bernie Aucoin; and
  (vii) East Power Fundamentals and the &Genco8 ) managed by Lloyd Will

b) West Power ) there will be no changes to the Portland office which is
managed by Tim Belden and Chris Calger .  Both Tim and Chris will continue to
report to the EA OOC.
c) Canada and Mexico ) there will be no changes to the Canadian or Mexican
offices which are managed by Rob Milnthorp and Max Yzaguirre respectively.
Both Rob and Max will continue to report to the EA OOC.
d) U.S. Natural Gas ) there are several changes anticipated in this business
consistent with the goals and objectives described above. The changes
primarily affect the East, Central, West and Texas gas regions. Each region
will consist of a single gas team incorporating trading, mid-market and
origination. Each team will have one income statement, one book and a joint
accountability. However, a clear delineation of responsibilities inside these
teams will continue to exist in which the trading organization will manage
the risk, income statement and product development aspects of the
partnership. The originators will have the primary responsibility to generate
origination income, provide coverage, deal flow, lead strategy formulation,
provide information and generate strategic positions. Overall, the team will
be rewarded based upon increasing the value of the book, meeting
coverage/deal flow targets and meeting its strategic/growth goals in the
Eastern, Western, Central and Texas gas markets.  The team will be
responsible for covering the LDC,s, muni,s/co-ops, industrials, IOU,s, IPP,s
and the producers.  There will be an increasing focus on the upstream side of
the business including the producers, transporters and storage providers in
addition to market area opportunities. The team will utilize all of ENA,s
product capabilities including the gas commodity, assets and capital. Each of
these groups will report directly to the EA OOC;
East Gas ) a single East Gas Team incorporating trading, mid-market and
origination will be formed under the co-leadership of Scott Neal and Frank
Vickers who will be returning from Portland to join this team.
West Gas  ) in a similar manner, a West Gas Team will be formed co-managed by
Phillip Allen and Barry Tycholiz, who will be joining us in Houston from the
Canadian team. The Denver office under Mark Whitt will be integrated under
this team.
Central Gas )  in a similar manner, a Central Gas Team will be formed
co-managed by Hunter Shively and Laura Luce. The Chicago office will be
integrated into this team.
Texas Gas ) the Texas Gas Team will be managed by Tom Martin. This team will
continue to manage the gas trading business around HPL until the pending sale
is concluded in Q2 2001.  After the sale of HPL, this team will build a Texas
gas business without ownership of the HPL assets.
Financial ) this group will continue to be managed by John Arnold with no
significant changes.
Derivatives ) this group, lead by Fred Lagrasta, will offer derivative and
financial mid-market products and services to the natural gas market
specifically targeting CFO,s and treasury departments.  Fred will continue to
maintain certain existing mid-market accounts with a number of producer and
industrial accounts where relationships are well formed. Otherwise,
mid-market coverage will gravitate to the regions. The New York office gas
marketing efforts will continue to be managed by Fred.
Upstream Products ) this group, lead by Jean Mrha, will develop several
distinct product offerings for the upstream segment of the gas market.  This
group will develop and market the product in conjunction with the regions.
This is consistent with our desire to have a broader product offering and
greater market penetration in the upstream segment.  These products include
producer outsourcing, similar to our successful Petro-Canada and Suncor
relationships in Canada, physical storage re-engineering, compressor
services, wellhead liquidity products and offshore asset and capital
products.  In addition, Jean will manage our Bridgeline joint venture with
Texaco.
Gas Structuring ) this group will be lead by Ed McMichael, reporting to Frank
Vickers, will provide structuring and deal support to all the gas teams.
Gas Fundamentals ) this group will be lead by Chris Gaskill, reporting to
Hunter Shively, will provide fundamentals to all the gas teams.

Julie Gomez will continue to support the gas floor through several identified
projects including long-term supply/demand analysis and, natural gas
transportation capacity trading opportunities.

There is an expectation of some customer overlap between the gas and power
groups; for example, the combination utilities and the IPP,s.  The teams will
coordinate with regard to the combination utilities like Con. Edison or
PG&E.  With regard to the IPP,s, to the extent that the product offering
involves an underlying power position, the power teams will manage. We have
asked Janet Dietrich to coordinate such overlaps between the two
organizations in Houston.

e) Technical/Restructuring - In the effort to consolidate and centralize our
technical resources (engineering, development, operations, pipeline) to
ensure that this skill base is available to all ENA groups and utilized
productively across the organization, Brian Redmond will form and manage the
Technical Services Group.  This group will manage ENA,s technical risks and
will provide, on a cost basis, technical services for the entire ENA
organization. This group will manage the interface with EE&CC and OEC.  In
addition, the Restructuring Group, currently managed by Dick Lydecker, will
report to Brian Redmond.  This group is currently monetizing a large portion
of the merchant investment portfolio given our current strategies.  This
group will have continuing responsibility to manage troubled commodity and
capital transactions that need considerable time and attention to manage risk
and monetize.

In addition to these responsibilities, Brian will manage the pending sale and
transition of the HPL asset over the next couple quarters as regulatory and
securities approvals are obtained in order to complete the sale.  Brian will
report to the EA OOC.

f) Principal Investing  )  with the departure of Jeff Donahue to new
opportunities in EBS, ENA,s venture capital function will be managed by
Michael L. Miller.  This group makes small investments in distributed
generation, power quality and technology companies that can benefit from
Enron,s distribution channels and expertise.  Michael will report to the EA
OOC.

g) Corporate Development ) Tim Detmering will assume the corporate
development responsibilities for ENA as Jeff transitions to his new role and
will report to the EA OOC.

h) Generation Investments ) there will be no changes to this group managed by
Dave Duran. Dave will continue to report to the EA OOC.

i) Energy Capital Resources ) there will be no changes to this group
currently lead by C. John Thompson and Scott Josey.  John and Scott will
continue to report to the EA OOC.

As a final note in the interest of keeping things simple, Enron Americas will
have two operating divisions  - Enron North America and Enron South America.
As a result, we will continue to conduct business under these two operating
companies; therefore, eliminating the need to change legal entities et al.
If you are currently a commercial employee of ENA or ESA you will continue to
conduct business in that company.

We look forward to another exciting year in the North American energy
market.  This is certainly a company unrivaled in the marketplace with the
most talented employees.  The opportunities are endless.  We wish you and
your family a very happy and safe holiday season.


Return from Mason, TX


We can start the reviews as soon as you are ready. Please note that the
message from HR is we are not communicating rankings which is a change from
what was originally planned.

Thanks - Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
04:56 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin @ ENRON                           12/13/2000 04:49 PM

To: Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona
Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joel
Henenberg/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard C McKeel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ
Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vanessa Schulte/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Gillis/CAL/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Avril Forster/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sylvia A
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark D Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Clark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Francisco deJesus/NA/Enron@ENRON, AnneMarie Allex/NA/Enron@Enron, Janet
De La Paz/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Performance Evaluation

Dear Managers & Supervisors,
Thank you for your participation and contributions to the Year End 2000 PRC
process.    It was a privilege for me to witness all of you making decisions
that were beneficial to Enron and the development of the employees that you
supervise.    Now what remains to be done is to give your employees their
feedback verbally and in written form.
I encourage all of you to complete your employee's evaluations before bonuses
and merit increases are given on 2/5/01.

Please remember:

 All employees in non-bonusable categories must have their performance
evaluations reviewed by HR and Legal before the evaluation is presented to
the employee.
Rankings will remain confidential and will not be communicated to employees.
HR will participate as observers of some reviews.

Let us know how we can assist you,
Your HR Team


John,

Dailies traded 33.25 late in the day after trading in the 28.5 range in the
morning.
Feb 32.5 (10.78 hr)
Mar 33.5 (11.64 hr)

Regards,
Clinton <<AB Power Fax.xls>>

----------------------------------------------
Clinton Kripki
GFI Group Inc.
Phone:  212 968 2813
email:  clinton.kripki@gfinet.com
website:  www.gfinet.com

***************************************************************
Confidentiality note: This e-mail contains information from the
GFI Group Inc. and/or its affiliates, including GFInet inc.,
that is confidential and/or legally privileged.   This
information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity named on this e-mail.  This e-mail and its content may
not be reproduced or retransmitted without the express written
permission of The GFI Group.
***************************************************************

 - AB Power Fax.xls


This meeting was requested by Carol St. Clair and had been previously scheduled for both October 2 and later October 9 but canceled each of these dates.

Please let me know if this newly scheduled time slot will not work.

Thanks,
Sandy Haldeman (Ext. 53879)


Crude 24X7 WTI Marketing Effort

Trade Count:
 180  Trades
 8.56  Million Barrels
  6  Counterparties Transacting Today
 27 Counterparties Transacting to Date


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/07/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,114
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,106
Total Life to Date Transactions	414,524

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/07/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,512	75%
Enron Europe Limited	145	37%
Global Products	159	30%
Enron Metals	298	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	47%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,629,499,517
MTD	12,634,782,454
LTD	226,066,467,133
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,141,702,594

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	15,798,097,545

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	550
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,213
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,857
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,695


Sounds good.  Should we put out a note through Ginger that indicates the changes???

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Novosel, Sarah
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 10:52 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	RE: FERC ANOPR on Generator Interconnection

Jim:

Yes, Susan is the lead and I have a call in to her now to see if she is coming up for the conference next week.  In response to your earlier email about filling in the Team Coverage chart due to Tom Briggs' departure, this is what Linda and Rick and I talked about earlier this week (you were unable to come to the meeting because you were at the EPSA Reg Affairs meeting).

Tom was on the Standards of Conduct team and was the inside counsel writing out comments.  Leslie has agreed to write all of the comments with support on our native load position from Christi and me on an as needed basis.

Tom was the lead on the market based rate inquiry.  We put Donna on as the lead for that proceeding.  She's been following it pretty closely and is on top of the FERC process/procedure aspect of whatever needs to be done.  Alan will provide the technical consulting part (and we may need outside consulting as well) but Donna will be responsible for organizing the team and doing an initial draft of the comments (if or when we need to write comments).

Tom was on a couple of other teams, but because he was not taking a lead role, I don't think he needs to be replaced.

Let me know what you think.

Sarah

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Novosel, Sarah
Subject:	FW: FERC ANOPR on Generator Interconnection

Is Susan the lead??

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 8:57 AM
To:	acomnes@enron.com; Hawkins, Bernadette; Nersesian, Carin; Nicolay, Christi L.; Fulton, Donna; Scheuer, Janelle; Hartsoe, Joe; Shelk, John; jsteffe@enron.com; Noske, Linda J.; Robertson, Linda; Alvarez, Ray; Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Mara, Susan; Lindberg, Susan; Hoatson, Tom
Subject:	FERC ANOPR on Generator Interconnection

Last night, FERC issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) on Standardizing Generator Interconnection Agreements and Procedures.  The ANOPR incorporates the ERCOT interconnection procedures, modified by various "best practices" identified by the Commission in an attachment.  A public meeting has been scheduled for November 1st in Washington, although the notice of the meeting is not yet available.  We will forward it when it becomes available.  The ANOPR is attached.

 - rm02-1.pdf << File: rm02-1.pdf >>


If you have an Enron Company Pager please turn it in to Claudia or myself by the end of this week.  We are going to close our account with Pagenet.

Thanks for your help.

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


Just a reminder that when entering a wheel, the Interchange ID must be the
same for the import and export.  When the Import is labeled as "EPMI_CISO_**"
and the Export as "CISO_EPMI_**," the ISO views these as unique imports and
exports.  They will not be linked together for a wheel, thus causing
ancillary services charges to occur.

Thank you!


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 10:03 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Doug Leach                           11/20/2000 09:48 AM

To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey K Skilling@Enron
cc:
Subject: Management Conference

Ken & Jeff,

Each year I attend the Enron Management Conference the more I realize that
the daily leadership and vision that the Office of the Chairman provides is
what allows us to meet and exceed our goals. That leadership and vision in
turn empowers every employee to do their job and that empowerment translates
into continued success. That is what make Enron so unique in the global
marketplace. Thank you for making this such a great company to work for.

Doug


[IMAGE]	        October 2001

	         Cardmember Central Newsletter

[IMAGE]	This monthly        newsletter will help you get the most from your online experience with us,        and keep you informed of the latest features of Citi
        online products and services. To find out more, visit Cardmember        Central . 		[IMAGE]	 In this issue:          ?   Stop              Receiving Paper Statements  in the Mail and Get a $5 Statement Credit*  ?   Sort              Your Transactions ?View Your Unbilled Transactions and Statement Activity          ! Your Way  ?   #2              ranking by Gomez  for Top Internet Credit Card Sites

[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]          	 Stop Receiving Paper Statements in the Mail and Get a $5 Statement Credit  With the free All-Electronic option, you can stop getting a paper statement in the mail     each month and be notified by email when your latest statement is available for online viewing. After enrolling, you're on your way to     earning a $5 statement credit. This offer expires November 30, 2001.*  Once you've received your email statement notice, sign?on to Cardmember        Central  from any computer, anywhere, and securely view your stat! ement        in its entirety. You can then choose to download it, file it, or print a        copy. Even if your computer crashes, your information is safely stored in        our network and will not be affected.   What makes this option so appealing is the ability to click on an individual        transaction to view the details behind it. In the paper world, you?d        have to pick up the phone and call us to get the same information. Opting        for All?Electronic also means that you have the power of paying online with        Click?to?Pay
. Not only does        your paper statement stop, but the traditional paper check, envelope and        stamp disappear too.  It takes just a few minutes to enroll. Sign-on         to Cardmember Central. From the Manage My Account Menu, go to Stop! Paper        Statements. This no-cost service will become effective at the beginning        of the next billing cycle. All-Electronic is the perfect way to manage your Citi        credit card accounts on the Internet.  Return        to the Top   Sort Your        Transactions?View Your Unbilled Transactions and Statement Activity Your Way.  The advantages of viewing        your statement through Account Online keep adding up. Now you can sort your        unbilled and statemented transactions in any order that meets your needs.        Simply click on what you want to sort by and it does it automatically. Sort        and view all account activity in ascending or descending order by:       !   Transaction date           Posting date           Merchant name or description           Amount   To see how it works, sign-on         and view an online statement or your unbilled activity.  Return        to the Top    #        2 Ranking by Gomez for Top Internet Credit Card Sites.   Based on        our newly designed Internet site, Cardmember Central at citicards.com         rose to the # 2 overall ranking by Gomez for Top Int! ernet Credit Card Sites.  We also ranked #1 for Ease of Use and #1 in Relationship Services!  It?s through your feedback that we?re able to provide the best        online experience available. A big "Thank You" for your        comments about Cardmember Central! Feel free to contact us with your views        concerning this newsletter, through the Help/Contact Us menu at     Cardmember Central .   Return to the Top

  	     *If! you have already registered for the All-Electronic option, you are          not eligible for the $5 statement credit. You must enroll by November          30, 2001 in order to qualify. In addition, you must be enrolled in All-Electronic          for four consecutive months to be eligible. No statement credits will          be awarded to accounts enrolled in All-Electronic for less than four consecutive          months.  Your statement credit will be posted on your March 2002 statement. Your account    must remain open and in good standing per your Citibank Cardmember Agreement at    the time of fulfillment to qualify.  If you have difficulty linking to any of the above URLs, simply cut and paste this URL into your browser:          http://info.citibankcards.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/mcp?p=036$v036_i4RFMP012000m9Puc9P$t  Notice: If you do not wish to receive future email updates about the exciting          offers and s! ervices available to you as a Citibank cardmember, go to:          unsubscribe   This message is for information purposes only.   Please understand that          we cannot respond to individual messages through this email address. It          is not secure and should not be used for credit card account related questions.  For credit card account related questions, sign-on to  Cardmember          Central  and use the Write to Customer Care feature under the Help/Contact Us menu.  ? 2001 Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. Member FDIC  All rights reserved. Citibank is a registered service mark of Citicorp.

[IMAGE]


MEMORANDUM

TO: State Issues Committee

FROM: Jane Cahill, State Issues Committee Chair
            Samantha Slater, Manager of State & Regional Affairs

DATE: October 18, 2001

RE: October 22nd South/Southeast Region Conference Call
      REMINDER

We will hold a conference call on Monday, October 22, 2001, at 2:00 p.m. (EDT).  This week's call will focus on legislative and regulatory issues and recent developments in the South/Southeast region.  To access this call dial 1-800-937-6563.  Ask for the EPSA/Samantha Slater Call.  An agenda is outlined below.

October 22, 2001 Conference Call Agenda

?Arkansas

?Georgia

?Florida

?Kentucky

?Louisiana

?Oklahoma

?Tennessee

?Texas

?Virginia


Enclosed is the Enron Guaranty and LC form.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


Congratulations on your promotion to MD Sally!  That is wonderful and well
deserved.

Susan


Please put my name on the list to attend this forum on Wednesday, January
26.  Thanks.


I appreciate it!  Hope all is well with you...we're doing fine now that the
flu made its way through our house.

Fletch


My groups survey should be there for January, I just finished.  Please let me
know if you need any more information.  Thanks.
PL


Start Date: 1/15/02; HourAhead hour: 7;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


He could have solved this problem in 20 minutes, right?

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/25/2001 12:40 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Davis favors tiered rate increases but still clings to "no new rate
increases"

Power Hogs May Get Hit In Pocketbook
Davis favors tiered rate increases
David Lazarus, Chronicle Staff Writer
Sunday, March 25, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/25/M
N30195.DTL
Gov. Gray Davis, faced with the near inevitability of raising consumers'
electricity bills, is leaning toward a rate system whereby those who use more
power pay more than those who conserve, The Chronicle has learned.
Sources close to the governor said he is being lobbied by his own staff
members to accept a so-called structured rate system.
Top officials from his own administration told lawmakers Friday that the
state may end up spending more than twice the $10 billion previously
estimated to purchase power on behalf of California's near-bankrupt
utilities.
If so, the officials warned that consumers' electricity rates could double.
In the case of Pacific Gas and Electric Co., this would mean customers'
average monthly power bills would rise from $60 to $120.
Consumers throughout the Bay Area believe that at least some increase is on
the way.
"We're going to have to bite the bullet and pay the money," said Larry
Webster, a retired Caltrans worker in Redwood City. "We might as well admit
that electricity is no longer a nickel. It's a dime. If you're going to use
it,
let's pay for it."
Steve Maviglio, a spokesman for the governor, distanced himself yesterday
from estimates that rates would double. The figures reported in the press, he
said, "were wildly high."
"The governor still believes he can live within the existing rate structure,
" Maviglio said. "Until we know the results of the negotiations with the
utilities, you can't conclude anything."
The state is negotiating a multibillion-dollar bailout package with PG&E and
Southern California Edison Co. to relieve the utilities of about $13 billion
in debt.
PG&E and Edison have been saying for months that there is no way California
can overcome its current energy woes without higher rates. The irony of the
Davis administration now saying the same thing was not lost on the two
companies.
"The state is in the exact same position the utilities were in last fall,"
said John Nelson, a PG&E spokesman. "Either wholesale prices need to come
down or retail prices need to go up. The disparity is too large."
Statewide blackouts last week drove home the precariousness of California's
energy situation to ratepayers -- and may have served as a blessing in
disguise for the governor.
COST VS. OUTAGES
If given a choice between further outages and paying higher rates, many
consumers said they would accept increases in their power bills.
"I don't like either choice," said Janet Leroux, facing the possibility of a
gooey mess if the air conditioning goes out at her downtown San Francisco
candy store. "But I guess I'd go with higher rates. I sure didn't like the
blackouts."
Publicly, the governor has been insisting for weeks that rates will stay
within "the existing rate structure" -- a stealthy way of saying that
January's 9 percent increase and an expected 10 percent increase next year
will remain in place.
But privately, he and his staff are discussing additional rate increases that
could be spread over as long as 10 years, sources said.
Utility executives and power generators told The Chronicle last week that a
minimum 30 percent rate increase lasting up to a decade is in the cards.
"For the good of California, it's inevitable," said Gary Ackerman, executive
director of the Western Power Trading Forum, a Menlo Park energy industry
association.
Sacramento resident John Hax observed that when temperatures soar in the
Central Valley this summer, he'd be more than willing to pay a higher price
for power if this keeps the air conditioners on.
"It's like gasoline," he said. "I don't like paying higher prices for
gasoline, but that's the price of doing business."
Ratepayers draw the line, though, at any increase topping 10 or 20 percent.
"If it was 20 percent, I'd probably do it," said Tracy resident Mark
Dougherty. "But if it was more, like 50 percent, I'd rather go with rolling
blackouts."
"I'd rather have blackouts," agreed Jenny Soghomonian, owner of a shoe-
repair shop in San Francisco's Financial District. "I don't want to pay rates
that are so much higher."
NOT EVERY COST PALATABLE
This is the tightrope that state officials and industry players now find
themselves walking: While consumers may be willing to pay more to avoid
blackouts, they aren't willing to swallow virtually any cost thrown their
way.
Yet if rates are not high enough, they may not prevent daily blackout threats
this summer and beyond.
"Higher rates are the price signal that it takes for conservation," said Tom
Higgins, senior vice president of Edison International, parent company of
Southern California Edison.
Simply put, he meant that most consumers will not aggressively conserve
power, and thus alleviate shortages, unless there is a financial incentive to
do so.
Rebates proposed by the governor have met with only a lukewarm response,
requiring, critics say, too much effort on the part of individual ratepayers.
But a sudden spike in monthly power bills almost certainly would prompt
widespread conservation measures.
"It adjusts consumer behavior," Higgins said. "People want to get their bills
back down."
RATES' EFFECT ON USAGE
He and other industry sources said higher rates are perhaps the only way
Californians will achieve the 10 percent conservation goal sought by the
governor -- a move seen as vital if blackouts are to be avoided this summer.
"It's intellectually dishonest to think there's any other way out of this,"
Higgins said.
Consumer activists' initial reaction to any talk of a rate increase comes
across loud and clear: No, no, no.
"No bailout. No rate increases. No secret deals," said Harvey Rosenfield,
head of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights in Santa Monica. "We
need to get back to a regulated system."
Rosenfield is the biggest fly in the governor's ointment. He has threatened
to push through a ballot initiative re-regulating California's power market
if Davis cannot find a consumer-friendly way out of the current fix.
Because of Rosenfield's past success in writing a ballot measure on insurance
rebates, which delivered about $800 million to consumers, his threat is taken
seriously in Sacramento.
"We've paid too much already," Rosenfield said. "A fair price is what we were
promised by deregulation, which was a 20 percent rate decrease."
However, when he was asked whether there was any room to discuss a structured
rate increase such as the idea being promoted by the governor's staff,
Rosenfield toned down his characteristic rhetoric.
"Big users should pay more," he said after a moment's reflection. "I'm open
to a tiered system but only if it's fair."
Rosenfield quickly added that he would have to see how other consumer
advocates felt about the matter before agreeing to negotiate such things with
Davis.
MOVE TOWARD STRUCTURED RATES
Clearly, though, momentum is building toward a system of structured power
rates, which probably would include increases of varying sizes for consumers.
The California Public Utilities Commission is scheduled to address January's
9 percent rate increase on Tuesday. That increase originally was given only a
three-month duration, but most observers expect it to be renewed for at least
another three months, if not longer.
PUC President Loretta Lynch declined to comment on the likelihood of rates
going up but added her voice to those backing a structured system.
"I am a fan of restructuring rates to exempt conservation," she said. "People
who use a whole lot of power should pay more."
The biggest electricity customer in the state is the state itself, now that
California is purchasing power on behalf of its cash-poor utilities. The
state already has spent about $4 billion buying electricity and has yet to
determine how the cash will be recouped from consumers.
San Francisco resident Rosita Magee accepts that for California to find its
energy footing once more, rates will probably be heading up. "That way, you
have more convenience and electricity, more stability," she said.
But Magee has come up with another solution, one that doesn't involve rate
increases and rolling blackouts.
She's moving to Texas.
Chronicle staff writers Matthew Stannard and Pia Sarkar contributed to this
report. / E-mail David Lazarus at dlazarus@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1


I'm not sure what is happening on my position.  It may have to do with how
you shaped the forward vol and price curves at each level.  My VAR is so
dependent on spread levels and vols that a small change in the Jan vols could
produce that effect.
The results certainly provide evidence of a need for higher VAR going into
the winter.
John

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Frank Hayden @ ENRON                           09/15/2000 06:32 PM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Stress Test

The below file shows the results of the two stress test requested.  Under the
$7 dollar stress, NYMEX curve was shifted to $7 dollars with all other price
curves proportionally shifted.  Under the $9 dollar test, not only were the
price curves shifted, but volatilites were stressed as well with NYMEX
volatility going to 100% and all other vol locations being raised accordingly.

Key findings include:
$7 dollar stress only raised VaR by 79%
$9 dollar stress raised VaR by 134%

It is interesting to note that with the seven dollar stress, VaR on the
financial desk actually decreased.  This would seem to imply that up to the
seven dollar strike, the financial desk is long gamma (which overall reduces
risk).  But between the seven dollar and nine dollar strike, it appears that
the desk becomes short gamma, thereby acceralatering the amount of risk and
increasing VaR by 74%.  Does this make sense or is something else happening?

Frank

---------------------- Forwarded by Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron on 09/15/2000
03:43 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sunil Dalal                           09/15/2000 02:54 PM

To: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Lavo/Arnold Stresses

Attached below are the $7 and $9 stresses that were run at the request of
Lavo ($7) and Arnold ($9).  I ran the results against the AGG-IV portfolio.


Yes I did.  Muchas Garcias !!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farrell, Keegan
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:46 PM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE: Denver office deals - Confirmation Procedure

Hey Miss Debra,

I just wanted to verify that you got the location notice for tomorrow's meeting.  Thanks,

Keegan

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Perlingiere, Debra   On Behalf Of Wallumrod, Ellen
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	Farrell, Keegan
Subject:	FW: Denver office deals - Confirmation Procedure
When:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:00 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	EB38 - we'll find a confrence room - let's meet in Gerald's office

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Wallumrod, Ellen
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:15 AM
To:	Wallumrod, Ellen; Staab, Theresa; Nemec, Gerald; Perlingiere, Debra; Richardson, Stacey
Subject:	Updated: Denver office deals - Confirmation Procedure
When:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:00 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	EB38 - we'll find a confrence room - let's meet in Gerald's office

Due to a conflict, we will move the meeting to 2pm - hope everybody can make it.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

November 9, 2001 5:00pm through November 12, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI:         SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER:     ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  SAP                 POSTPONED
Time:  Fri 11/9/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at    2:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 11/9/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  12:00:00 AM PT
	Sat 11/10/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  8:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Add New SAP Storage
Environments Impacted:  SAP
Purpose: Disk growth in SAP required procurement of additional disk.
Backout: Revert to current configuration.
Contact(s): 	Gary Sentiff    713-345-5125

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sun 11/11/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  9:30:00 PM CT
	Sun 11/11/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  7:30:00 PM PT
	Sun 11/11/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Mon 11/12/2001 at  3:30:00 AM London
Outage:  CPR
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose:  CPR routine database maintenance
Backout:
Contact(s): 	CPR Support    (713) 284-4175

SITARA:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 11/10/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  7:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 11/10/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  5:00:00 AM PT
	Sun 11/11/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/11/2001 at  1:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Sitara and CPR
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Sitara and CPR routine database maintenance
Backout:
Contact(s): 	CPR Support    (713) 284-4175
		Sitara on Call    (713) 288-0101

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


SGT Reyna,

Definitely a good idea -- and one that EBS has flirted with a couple of
times.  In early '99 the Network Development group sent me out to meet with
military facilities managers along our proposed fiber route from Houston to
Jacksonville.  I had a few good meetings, stocked up on cheap class six
liquor, and reported back some interest from the Navy.  Unfortunately there
was not much follow up from our sales folks (though it did begin our
relationship with NASA).

6 Months later a new vertical was set up at EBS to sell services to federal
agencies, including the DOD.  The group piggy-backed their efforts with Enron
Federal Solutions - the EES-esque vertical to outsource energy to military
bases.  However, because of much legislative and regulatory uncertainty (Bob
Frank can elaborate) the EBS tie-in never really took off with the EFS
business.

The upshot?  I think there is still a viable business there, especially if we
can demonstrate massive cost savings to the DOD through our trading
organization, but EBS has never fully engaged in a focused effort in this
area.  The only way I see EBS at this point doing any significant deals with
the DOD is if they create a better team - with federal government knowledge
and a handle on military-speak to pursue these deals, or if EBS "falls into"
opportunities through origination leads that come from our group  (much like
the U.S. Space Alliance-NASA leads) or through ENA/EES.   A good idea --
difficult to execute.

Thoughts anyone?

SPC Bolton

	Margo Reyna@ENRON
	11/30/00 08:41 AM

		 To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Just an Idea

Although it is altogether different from the electric industry, is it
possible that EBS could realize significant commercial opportunities if it
were to look into providing broadband services to military bases?

Margo Reyna
Regulatory Analyst
Enron Corp., Government Affairs
Phone:  713-853-9191


Enron has been increasing security at its facilities around the world.  Some of the changes took effect immediately (e.g. additional security personnel) and some are phasing in.  While not all of the changes will be visible, there are a few that will have an impact on everyday activities.  In all the steps we take and recommendations we make, we will be making our facilities and systems more secure and endeavoring to increase your sense of security, while doing our best to minimize disruption to our day-to-day business.

Primary responsibility for Enron Corp. Security resides in our business controls organization.  You can contact this organization through their website (<http://home.enron.com/security>), by phone (713-345-2804), or by email (CorporateSecurity@enron.com <mailto:CorporateSecurity@enron.com>).  John Brindle, Senior Director, Business Controls, leads this organization.  Please feel free to provide John and his team with your comments and questions, or to report security threats.

We have two areas to update you on:  changes in the access procedures for the Enron Center Campus in Houston and changes to our travel advisory.

Access to the Enron Center

Over the next few days, the following access control procedures will be instituted at the Enron Center (and other facilities where practical):

?	As employees swipe their badges at the card readers to enter the Enron Center, a guard will match the photo on the badge to the bearer.

?	Employees and contractors who forget their badges must present a valid picture ID to obtain access to the Enron Center (U.S. driver's license, U.S. or foreign passport, or some form of U.S. federal, state or local identification).

?	Visitors to the Enron Center must produce a valid photo ID when signing in at the lobby reception desk and must completely fill out the visitor card.  Adult visitors without a valid photo ID (U.S. driver's license, U.S. or foreign passport, or some form of U.S. federal, state or local identification) will not be allowed access to the Enron Center.

?	Visitors to Enron facilities must be escorted by an Enron employee or badged contractor at all times.

?	Visitors to the Enron Center will be met in the lobby by an Enron employee or badged contractor, signed into a visitor's log at the lobby reception area by the employee or badged contractor, and escorted to their appointment.  At the conclusion of the appointment, the visitor will be escorted to the lobby by an employee or badged contractor, the visitor badge collected, and the visitor signed out in the log at the plaza reception area by the escorting employee or badged contractor.

?	Employees are also being asked to participate in the security of their workplace by following these guidelines; report suspicious activity to Security (phone 3-6300), do not open secured doors for individuals unknown to you or hold doors open, allowing "tail gating" by others.

These will be the first in a series of new security procedures to be instituted at Enron.  We ask that all employees be patient during congested times in the lobby.  As we proceed and obtain increased guard personnel and equipment, we expect the inconvenience to decrease.  We hope you understand these measures are being instituted for the security of all our employees.

Travel Advisory Update

With the beginning of retaliatory strikes, we have two important recommendations:

?	While the retaliatory strikes are ongoing, corporate security recommends that travel through or to the Middle East be avoided.  We continue to strongly recommend that all travel during this time to Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Georgia, and the Kyrgyz Republic be canceled.  In addition, we recommend that planned travel to Egypt, Israel, Gaza/West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Algeria be very carefully considered.

?	For non-U.S. citizens traveling in the United States, corporate security recommends that you carry documentation.  There have been several recent reports of non-U.S. citizens who reside in the United States being questioned and asked for documentation when boarding U.S. domestic flights. As a result, we suggest that all non-U.S. citizens who currently reside in the United States - and who do not have Permanent Resident Alien status - carry their passport, Form I-94 and Form I-797 at all times.  We would also suggest that Permanent Resident Aliens carry their Permanent Resident (Green) Card as proof of their status as a precautionary measure.  It appears that Immigration Officials may be applying a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act that requires individuals over the age of 18 to carry his/her "registration" documentation with them at all times. This can include a Permanent Resident Card, Form I-94 card, Employment Authorization Card, Border Crossing Card, or a Temporary Resident Card. Immigration Officials have not historically been asking domestic travelers for "registration" documentation, but in light of the heightened security measures and current atmosphere, it would be best to be prepared with all of your documentation proving your current lawful status.

We will keep you apprised of new information and developments on the Corporate Security website and by e-mail, as appropriate.


To support the data storage of ZMET data here is a proposal for what the
table structure should be.  In addition, after discussing the status messages
it is important to differentiate between those which effect availability and
those that do not.  The FAULTS table includes a flag field INCLUDE which
serves this purpose for STAR.

A improvement to this table would be to add a counter description field
var(4) which would hold one of the following descriptions; SOT, LOT, DT, WOT,
MT, RT, and EST.  This will allow us do differentiate status messages by
which counter they are associated with.

Since the intent is to mirror the SQL Server and the STAR db we need to make
these changes to both.  I'd like to get the SQL server changes ASAP so I can
develop some additional reports.

Let me know what you think

JD


Dana has called in sick this morning.  Her tonsils are swollen and she doesn't fill well.

Thank you,

Rosalyn Lum
Business Analysis & Reporting
(O) 713-853-7961
(F)  713-646-5997


Laird,

Call me if you have any quesitons.

Thanks,

Kim


Please use this form of the CA.  We had to change the heading.  Thanks
Ben


Have I received a fax from ABB?


Attached are my updates to Steve's backgrounder and solutions documents.
I've also attached (for Rick) the summary of the CA State Treasurer's
proposal.

Best,
Jeff


/-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-\
How does your credit report present you to prospective employers,
loan officers, and landlords? Find out  with your FREE CREDIT
REPORT & free CreditCheck(R) Monitoring Service trial membership
from ConsumerInfo.Com!  Get yours now!
http://by.advertising.com/1/c/62072/34419/163176/163176

<a href="http://by.advertising.com/1/c/62072/34419/163176/163176">
AOL users click here </a>
\-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-/

   Word of the Day for Thursday March 21, 2002:

   logorrhea \law-guh-REE-uh\, noun:
   Excessive talkativeness or wordiness.

     By  his  own  measure,  he is a man of many contradictions,
     beginning with the fact that he is famous as a listener but
     suffers  from  "a  touch of logorrhea." He is so [1]voluble
     that one wonders how his subjects get a word in edgewise.
     --Mel  Gussow,  "Listener,  Talker, Now Literary Lion: It's
     Official." [2]New York Times, June 17, 1997

     It's also not good if your date has logorrhea.
     --Monte  Williams,  "8  Minutes  in  the  Life  of a Jewish
     Single:  Not  Attracted? Next!" [3]New York Times, March 5,
     2000

     Mr.  King,  who  possesses  an  enviable  superabundance of
     imagination, suffers from a less enviable logorrhea.
     --Michele  Slung,  "Scare  Tactics." [4]New York Times, May
     10, 1981
     _________________________________________________________

   Logorrhea  is  derived  from  Greek logos, "word" + rhein, "to
   flow."

References

   1. http://dictionary.com/wordoftheday/archive/2002/02/17.html
   2. http://www.nytimes.com/
   3. http://www.nytimes.com/
   4. http://www.nytimes.com/

_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._

You are currently subscribed to Dictionary.com Word of the Day as:
matt.motley@enron.com

To subscribe to the list by email, send a blank message to:
join-WordoftheDay@lists.lexico.com

To unsubscribe via email, send a blank message to:
leave-wordoftheday-357530C@lists.lexico.com

Subscriptions can be turned on and off from the Web at
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/list/

Dictionary.com Word of the Day
http://www.dictionary.com/wordoftheday/
(C) 2002 by Lexico Publishing Group, LLC.


It is amazing and yet not surprising how much Enron has accomplished in the
first six months of this year. You continue to make it happen.  We recognize
that you work hard every day to accomplish Enron,s business goals, and we are
pleased that many of you have shared in the company,s financial success
through Enron stock options.

As you may know, the current employee stock option program (also known as the
All Employee Stock Option Program or AESOP) began in 1994 and provided value
to participants through 2000.  Employees who have participated in this
program from its inception have realized a 1,119% increase in the value of
their stock options (assuming a stock price of $70) over the life of the
program.

Enron stock options are a valuable part of your total compensation package
and a contributing factor to your performance and to Enron,s continued
success.  Therefore, the Enron Executive Committee and the Compensation and
Management Development Committee of the Enron Board of Directors have decided
to continue to offer stock options as a part of your compensation package.

On May 1, 2000, the Committee approved an employee stock option program for
calendar years 2001 - 2005 (EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program).  It is
expected that EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program will be granted,
effective on or about December 29, 2000, for those employees who are eligible
on that date (please see note below).  The new program, which is subject to
final approval by Enron,s Board of Directors, is as follows:

? EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program will give stock options to
eligible full-time and part-time regular employees in domestic and
international companies/locations.
? The grant of non-qualified stock options will equal 25% of annual base
salary (5% of annual base salary for each year of a 5-year period) on
December 29, 2000. (Salary calculation and value may vary in some
international locations.)
? The Board will grant the stock options on December 29, 2000.
? Eligible employees hired in subsequent years will receive a prorated grant
of stock options.

Why commit your talent and energy to Enron?  EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option
Program, among other good reasons( that,s why.

In the coming weeks, you will be receiving more details about EnronOptions )
Your Stock Option Program.  To provide information and answer your questions,
we will introduce a special link on the Human Resources web-site, host
several eSpeak sessions and continue to communicate with you on a regular
basis.  In the meantime, if you have immediate questions, please contact your
Human Resources representative.

Note: In addition to final approval by Enron,s Board of Directors, granting
of options will be subject to New York Stock Exchange and state and federal
regulatory requirements.  It is expected that EnronOptions ) Your Stock
Option Program will be available to most Enron employees; however, some Enron
companies, employees may not be eligible due to legal, accounting, tax, labor
or business issues.  As you know, Enron changes to meet the needs of the
marketplaces we serve.  Given that need to change, we will continue to refine
the eligibility for EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program and will
communicate more details throughout the year with final eligibility being
determined on December 29, 2000.


Don,

Please advise of your interest in Alex's experience. He has 3+ years
experience trading in the real time power markets.  He currently trades the
ERCOT and WSCC regions for the Texas-New Mexico Power Company.

  - Alex resume.doc


Jamie Serota and Allan Van Fleet with Vinson & Elkins have developed a one hour CLE program covering the antitrust issues encountered when non-regulated entities such as Enron compete with regulated utilities for market share.  An outline of the program is attached.

Jamie Serota and Allan Van Fleet will present the CLE program on Wednesday, August 22, 2001 at the Doubletree Hotel, 400 Dallas (La Salle B room) from Noon to 1:30 p.m.  The program will be accredited for 1.00 hour of CLE credit including at least .25 hours of ethics credit.  If you would like to attend please RSVP by Wednesday, August 15, 2001 by sending an e-mail to my assistant, Janette Elbertson.

Lunch will be served.


EOL is launching steel on Monday, October 30.

Product types are:

US Steel Hot Rolled Fin Swap
US Steel Cold Rolled Fin Swap
US Steel Hot-Dipped Galvanized Fin Swap

Enron Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Deadline:  Need approvals from Credit by Thursday morning, October 26 and
Contracts and Legal by Friday afternoon, October 27.

The attached excel spreadsheet contains the targeted customer list.  Please
note that there are 4 worksheet tabs.

I know this is short notice, but as you can see below, we just received the
list today.

Thank you.

Lisa
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 01:06 PM
---------------------------

Rahul Seksaria @ ENRON

10/23/2000 12:58 PM
To: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL shortened list for credit

---------------------- Forwarded by Rahul Seksaria/Corp/Enron on 10/23/2000
12:57 PM ---------------------------

Rahul Seksaria

10/23/2000 09:33 AM
To: Naveed Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron, Carl Carter/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kevin O'Donnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Hermans/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sean
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Stanley/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: EOL shortened list for credit

Attached is a list of 123 counterparties we want preapproved by credit.
Please call me if you have any questions.

Regards
Rahul


Hi Sally,

I know it's very early to be contacting you, but I hope that you will
remember KPMG when you get to UBS and need help with systems
integration/data mapping type work.  UBS was one of my clients when I lived
in Switzerland and I was very involved with the implementation of a system
called DACFA 2 which was used for global data pooling and consolidation.  I
have actually re-initiated contact with people I know in UBS Corporate Audit
in Zurich and will be providing them with general information concerning
wholesale energy trading.

We would very much like to speak to you regarding your planned role in Netco
and the direction you think the company will take.  Again, I realize that's
it very early, but I know that you will continue to operate at Enron speed
and if we wait it will be too late to help.....

Best regards,

Randy Wilson
713 319 2459

*****************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized.

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
*****************************************************************************


The posted number was a mistake.


Dear Sir:

I have attached my resume for your review.  I have meetings from 8-9, and
10-2 tomorrow.  When would it be best for me to call you?

Cordially,

Gerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Lloyd.Will@enron.com [mailto:Lloyd.Will@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 12:12 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Cc: gsheble@iastate.edu
Subject: RE: opportunities

Thanks Vince.

I have contacted him and have given him your phone number.

He will attempt to contact you Thursady or Friday.

Good luck.

Vince J Kaminski
10/24/2000 03:59 PM

To:   Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:  RE: opportunities  (Document link: Lloyd Will)

Lloyd,

Yes, I would be very interested.

Vince

Lloyd Will
10/24/2000 02:45 PM

To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  RE: opportunities

Vince would you be interested in this professional.

I would be glad to facilitate a conference call.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 02:43
PM ---------------------------

"Sheble, G.B." <gsheble@iastate.edu> on 10/17/2000 04:52:57 PM

To:   "'Lloyd.Will@enron.com'" <Lloyd.Will@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: opportunities

Loyd

I tried to call yesterday, but you were out of the office.  My schedule
follows, would you want to pick a time for me to call you or send me a list
of times to pick?

Gerry

Fall 2000 Teaching Schedule
EE 553 MTWR 10 -11 AM Curtis Hall 308
ENGR 161 MW 2-4 Howe Hall 2228
Other Commitments
M 11-12 EP&ES
M 1-2 Office Hours
T 12-2 EP&ES Seminar
T 2-3 Office Hours
T 3-4 PSERC
T 5-6  EPRI-DOD
W 11-12 Office Hours
W 4-9 DSM
R 11-12 Office Hours
F 11-12 P&T
F 1-3 CAS
F 3-4 Departmental Meeting

-----Original Message-----
From: Lloyd.Will@enron.com [mailto:Lloyd.Will@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 8:00 AM
To: Sheble, G.B.
Subject: RE: opportunities

Give me a call any time to discuss things.

713-853-3383.

Thanks.

"Sheble, G.B." <gsheble@iastate.edu> on 10/15/2000 02:17:02 PM

To:   Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  RE: opportunities

Lloyd

I am attaching another resume for your review, please pass it along if
there
is any interest.

I would also like to discuss opportunities with you as I expect to graduate
with my MBA Summer 2001.

Cordially,

Gerry

===================================
Gerald B. Shebl,
Professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering
Director of Complex Adaptive Systems Program
1115 Coover Hall
Ames, Iowa 50011
voice: 515.294.3046
FAX: 515.294.4263
email: gsheble@iastate.edu
web: http://www.ee.iastate.edu/~sheble/
===================================

 - short_resume.doc


Start Date: 1/15/02; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011512.txt


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW2012  JAN 09,2002       2:07 PACIFIC      05:07 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) AmerenEnergy Generating Company Begins
Construction of 468MW Energy Center in Illinois, in an Advisory by
Industrialinfo.com

    Business Editors

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 9, 2002--The following is an
advisory by Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources,
Incorporated; Houston, Texas). AmerenEnergy Generating Company (Saint
Louis, Mo.) is currently underway with the construction of a $160
million 468 mega-watt (MW) energy center to be located in Elgin,
Illinois. AmerenEnergy is an operator of more than 3,500MW of
generating capacity.
	   Construction began in November of 2001 for The Elgin Energy
Center, located on 1559 Gifford Road near the intersection of Gifford
and Spaulding Roads in Cook County and completion is expected in the
fall of 2002.
	   Sargent & Lundy (Chicago, Ill.) was selected to provide
engineering services and Fru-Con Construction Corporation (Ballwin,
Mo.) was selected as the overall general contractor to construct the
new power station.
	   The facility will use four simple-cycle natural gas fired
turbines, which will produce up to 468MW of peak load electricity. The
turbines will have the capability to be operated with wet compression
if needed for power augmentation following achievement of normal full
load power output. Wet Compression entails introduction of water into
the inlet air duct and evaporation of the water in the compressor.
	   Ameren Corporation (NYSE: AEE) provides electric and gas services
to customers in Missouri and Illinois through its subsidiaries,
AmerenCIPS, AmerenUE, and AmerenEnergy Generating Company.
	   Ameren has $9 billion in assets, almost $6 billion in market
capitalization and $3.5 billion in total revenues. Ameren companies'
net generating capacity is nearly 12,000MW with a total of 14
base-load and hydroelectric plants, currently employing over 7,300
people.
	   Industrialinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including industry alerts and databases for the energy
and industrial markets. For more information on trends and upcoming
construction activities in the Power and Energy markets as well as
other industrial sectors send inquiries to
powergroup@industrialinfo.com or visit us at www.industrialinfo.com or
www.iirenergy.com.

    --30--LS/na*

    CONTACT: Industrial Information Resources Inc., Houston
             Britt Burt, 713/783-5147

    KEYWORD: TEXAS MISSOURI ILLINOIS
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: ENERGY OIL/GAS UTILITIES
    SOURCE: Industrial Information Resources Inc.

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


Attached is an update on the referenced matter.  Please call me if you have
any questions, comments, or suggestions.  Steve Kean, you may want to mention
this to Ken Lay, since he was involved in this very early on (a meeting with
Mayor Lanier probably in 1996 or so), and may be involved again.  Feel free
to forward this memo to others who may be interested.


For your pleasure
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
01:45 PM ---------------------------

"Louis Riley" <louisriley@houston.rr.com> on 10/18/2000 01:43:23 PM
To: <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Louis Riley Resume to Jeff Shankman

Dear Mr. Shankman,
?
Thank you for your time today.?
?
I faxed you my resume as you suggested.
?
Here is an electronic copy as well.
?
Sincerely,
?
?
Louis Riley
 - Louis Riley Cover Letter and Resume to Mr. Jeffrey Shankman 10.18.00.doc


Thank you for booking your travel with Continental Airlines.
Below is a copy of your flight information. Please refer to your
complete online itinerary for the respective details on your hotel
and car reservations.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

FLIGHT SUMMARY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Purchased
Itinerary Number: 1257977972
Round Trip
Booking ID: LWXFEG
1 adult USD 273.49
Taxes: USD 25.51

Total Cost: USD 299.00

Flight: from Houston, TX (IAH-Bush Intercontinental) to Cincinnati, OH
(CVG-Cincinnati N. Ky.)
Depart: 22-Nov-00 at  6:59 PM
Arrive: 22-Nov-00 at 10:29 PM

 Depart: Houston (IAH), 22-Nov-00 at  6:59 PM
 Arrive: Cincinnati (CVG), 22-Nov-00 at 10:29 PM
 Flight: Continental 4240, OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
 Aircraft:  ERJ
 Meal Service: Snack
 Duration: 2hr 30mn
 Distance: 879 mi
 Economy/Coach Class

Flight: from Cincinnati, OH (CVG-Cincinnati N. Ky.) to Houston, TX (IAH-Bush
Intercontinental)
Depart: 26-Nov-00 at  3:00 PM
Arrive: 26-Nov-00 at  4:40 PM

 Depart: Cincinnati (CVG), 26-Nov-00 at  3:00 PM
 Arrive: Houston (IAH), 26-Nov-00 at  4:40 PM
 Flight: Continental 4047, OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
 Aircraft:  ERJ
 Meal Service: n/a
 Duration: 2hr 40mn
 Distance: 879 mi
 Economy/Coach Class

----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have chosen the E-ticket option for your flight(s), a Travel
Itinerary and Receipt will be delivered within 3 - 5 days via U.S.
mail. If you have specified an alternate delivery location for your
E-ticket, we will send a Travel Itinerary and Receipt to the address
you specified, plus a Payment Receipt to the address that appears on
your credit card statement.

When you arrive at the airport on the day of your flight please
provide the ticket agent with your last name, flight number and photo
identification to receive your boarding pass(es).  For curbside check-in,
present your passenger receipt or a printout of this message and photo
ID.

E-Ticket customers can also use one of our automated eService Centers
or ESC. Our ESCs allow customers to check-in and receive a boarding
pass for all Continental U.S. domestic flights.  ESCs are conveniently
located near the ticket counter and gate areas in most of our U.S.
cities.  Baggage check is available at those ESCs located at the
ticket counter.

If E-Tickets are not available for your flight(s), or you have
elected to receive a paper ticket, we will send your ticket(s) and
receipt(s) to the address you specified during the booking process. If
your date of departure is:

-- within 3 days and E-Ticket is available for your flight(s), an
   E-Ticket will be issued.  If E-Ticket is not available, you will
   have been prompted online to call Continental Airlines On-Line
Reservations at 1 (888) 815-2665 to arrange
   the delivery of your tickets.
-- between 3 and 7 business days from today, by  2nd day or overnight
   mail.
-- more than 7 business days from today, by U.S. mail.

Photo identification will be required upon check-in, such as a Driver's
License, Military ID, Passport or an official identification card
issued by a government authority. For questions concerning this
requirement, please contact Continental Airlines or visit our web site at
http://www.continental.com.

A valid passport is required for international travel. Some
countries also have visa and/or health requirements. Please check with
the embassy of the country to which you are traveling, contact
Continental Airlines or visit our web site at http://www.continental.com.

If you wish to change hotel and car reservations, use
Continental Airlines On-Line Reservations at http://www.continental.com. To
change airline flights or for
en-route assistance, call 1 (888) 815-2665. Please have your itinerary
number available for the agent.

We wish you a pleasant trip and look forward to serving you
again soon.

Continental Airlines
http://www.continental.com/


Thanks for the note. I will be the first to admit the ClickAtHome program is
very rich.  We would need to reset expectations but,

Steps to reduce the costs might include :

Domestic - We can reset expectations and add a co-pay on the computers or
cease the program entirely.
 - Increase the ISP employee co-pay or cease the subsidy.
Non US - We can stop all efforts in these offices as the costs to implement
is very high due to tax, legal and logistical research.

As for the executive participation in ClickAthome, the exclusion of any class
of employees would cause the computers to be a taxable event to other
employees ie $400/employee but this is certainly an option.

Kevin- to your question, this was an unsolicited help in managing expenses as
employees have not been notified about the email box yet.  PR is working up a
game plan that  reduces any external risks as we inform employees about the
mail box.

Regarding laptops, this is indeed a savings given the Clickathome program.
However, the savings cannot be realized until IT makes available high-speed
network access from these Clickathome machines.  That progress is going
slower than we had hoped.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hannon, Kevin
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 8:21 AM
To: Kean, Steven
Cc: Brown, Suzanne
Subject: Re: Computers

Steve,

Thanks for the note, is this a product of our new expense idea email box, or
unsolicited help in managing expenses?  This is a good point and reminded me
we didn't talk about laptops on Monday.

Kevin

	Steven J Kean@ENRON 04/03/01 05:21 PM 	  To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON  cc:
Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications  Subject: Re:
Computers << OLE Object: StdOleLink >>

Tell him we are sending his note on to the appropriate person.

MARY
CLARK
04/03/2001 03:23 PM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Computers

Steve, I need your help in responding to this question.

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001 03:22
PM ---------------------------

	  From:  Sherri Sera                           04/03/2001 02:45 PM

To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Computers

---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001
02:46 PM ---------------------------

Anonymous

From: Anonymous on 04/03/2001 02:32 PM
To:
cc:

Subject: Computers

Since Enron and EBS are trying to cut costs and be more cost effective, why
would a vice president need an executive computer setup at home?  Especially
if they already have a laptop (provided by Enron)  they take home every night
and have taken advantage of the Click at Home program as well.  Since Enron
has gone through the expense of giving each and every employee the
opportunity of the Click at Home program, it seems to be a somewhat redundant
expense of which I might add is unnecessary in my opinion.

I feel it would behoove ALL EMPLOYEES, including executives, to be more
conscientious of costs and expenses to improve Enron's and EBS' bottom-line.
How can we ("Enron") be a world leading company if we don't have leading
world leaders that spend Enron's money as if it were there own.

I think it would be in Enron's best interest to set some guidelines regarding
expenses such as these.  Just because a person is an executive of the company
why should be allowed to have anything they want just because they can?

Thank you for your time and the opportunity to express myself.  Especially
since I am a shareholder also and care where the money goes.


Start Date: 10/26/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102620.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Hi.
Just thought I'd see how you were holding up in light of the circumstances.
Planning on coming back to the great white north for Xmas?
Give us a call sometime.
Bryn