---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 07/14/2000 07:25
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           07/09/2000 03:55 PM

To: Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pooling Meeting July 14, 2000

Jane, any chance you or Randy or Tori could go to this meeting?  Norm has
called it for this Friday, presumably to discuss some of the points you
raised in your discussion with him (according to the voice mail he left me).
It will be in El Paso, starting at 1:00 pm MT.

Unfortunately, I don't think I can make it, and I've left Norm a voice mail
message to that effect.  However, I'm not too optimistic about it getting
rescheduled for next week.  I'm losing 2-1/2 days going to Las Vegas for the
settlement conference as it is, and I will have to get my Order 637 comments
finalized by Friday afternoon in order to get them filed next Monday.  We
have some big problems with segmentation proposals (or lack thereof) for
Columbia and CNG, as well as some issues on several of the other pipelines
that filed.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 07/09/2000
03:42 PM ---------------------------

"Walker, Norman E." <WalkerN@EPEnergy.com> on 07/07/2000 05:12:58 PM
To: bcantre@enron.com, skinnml@texaco.com, rfoss@coral-energy.com,
tcarlson@apsc.com, pcervin@br-inc.com, pwri@dynegy.com,
gcvenz@duke-energy.com, petersdd@bp.com, john.hogan@southernenergy.com,
sam.brown@swgas.com, rbetonte@socalgas.com, pwah@socalgas.com,
carla.j.johnson@usa.conoco.com, nicholas.e.rassinier@usa.conoco.com,
rishikawa@socalgas.com, "Walker, Norman E." <WalkerN@EPEnergy.com>, "Royal,
Kathleen S." <RoyalK@EPEnergy.com>, emorris@oneok.com, sgentry@oneok.com,
susan.jones@ep.pge.com
cc: "Johnson, Susan L." <JohnsonS@EPEnergy.com>
Subject: Pooling Meeting July 14, 2000

Below are (1) a notice and agenda for a meeting July 14 in El Paso, (2) a
list of the invitees, (3) a draft of the goals that was sent out after the
last meeting and (4) a list of the receipt points grouped into the 18
pooling areas that we will be discussing.  Thank you to everyone who has
taken the time to discuss the 18 pool alternative (orginally the 16 pool
alternative).

If you have any questions regarding arrangements in El Paso, please contact
Ms. Susan Johnson at 915-496-2239.

Have a safe trip and I will see you Friday.

Norm

 <<Notice and agendas July 14.doc>>  <<Invitees july 14.doc>>  <<Draft of
Goals 20000606.doc>>  <<Pooling Point Daily Average Quantities 1999 and
2000.xls>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************

 - Notice and agendas July 14.doc
 - Invitees july 14.doc
 - Draft of Goals 20000606.doc
 - Pooling Point Daily Average Quantities 1999 and 2000.xls


Because the payback was done for October 2001, we can't do it in POPS so we will have to make manual entries to clear the imbalance from the books and show the sale from HPL to ENA.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	hbcamp@aep.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 5:15 PM
To:	Wynne, Rita
Cc:	Hall, Bob M; bcfisher@aep.com; rmbrown1@aep.com; daren.farmer@enron.com
Subject:	RE: Lobo Payout

Rita,
What time frame do intend to do this in?  I believe this contract is no longer effective after May 31, so if it is in October you will have to reactivate the transport contract so you can book it in POPS.
HC
---------------------- Forwarded by Howard B Camp/HO1/AEPIN on 11/08/2001 05:12 PM ---------------------------
To:        "hbcamp@aep.com@ENRON" <IMCEANOTES-hbcamp+40aep+2Ecom+40ENRON@enron.com>
cc:        "Hall, Bob M" <Bob.M.Hall@enron.com>, <kalastrapes@aep.com>, <ccernosek@aep.com>, <hbcamp@aep.com>, <bcfisher@aep.com>, <rmbrown1@aep.com>, <daren.farmer@enron.com>
Subject:        RE: Lobo Payout
I talked to Daren and he's going to put a deal in the system for the
sale of the gas from ENA to AEP, so there would be no need for a manual
invoice.
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:                  hbcamp@aep.com@ENRON
> Sent:                 Wednesday, November 07, 2001 2:26 PM
> To:                 Wynne, Rita
> Cc:                 Hall, Bob M; kalastrapes@aep.com; ccernosek@aep.com;
> hbcamp@aep.com; bcfisher@aep.com; rmbrown1@aep.com;
> daren.farmer@enron.com
> Subject:                 Lobo Payout
>
>
> Rita,
> Has the manual invoice been generated for the Lobo imbalance?
> Clem and Darren worked together and it was decided that since payback
> was made in October, Enron needs to generate a manual invoice.
> I need a copy of the invoice faxed to me or Bob at 832-668-1113.
> HC
>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Attached is PIRA's latest "API Weekly Comment."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact Dr.
Gary Ross at (212) 686-6808, email: garyross@pira.com.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "API Weekly Comment" outside a Client's licensed
distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are unsure of their
licensed distribution or require an extension of their current license
should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - api051501.pdf


Carlos,

Please, forward their resumes to us and we shall set up an interview for them.

Vince

carlos ordonez <ordonez@shasta.phys.uh.edu> on 11/21/2000 09:30:08 AM
To: Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
cc: vkamins@enron.com
Subject: Re: Greetings

Dear Vincent and Stinson,

Both my students would love to come visit you guys for an informal
visit in the near future. Please let me know well ahead of time
when they can come. If possible, see to it that their parking expenses
be paid when they do come.

I'll be in touch with you all over the next months about this and
a possible postdoctoral/trainee agreement (World Lab.).

Cheers,

Carlos


Robin - Can you send me the detail on this.  I want to know exactly how the
exotics are coming in.  (I will look at it tomorrow).  These positions look
fine I just want to get more precise.

Kathy

Robin Rodrigue
07/06/2000 12:15 AM
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FT Can Positions

Kathy,

Here is the FT Can Position including the Exotics file.  Let me know how it
looks.  I'm having trouble getting the IM position to pull in, so if I don't
send you a file soon just assume I'll plug the numbers to match the excel
file that Brian saved in the directory.

Thanks,
Robin


Hi, thanks for the update.  Per was in Houston last week,  and I've asked him
to get with you soon.  Please call him (he should be expecting your call) at
our office in NY at.   212-702-3910.  Would you also like to come to houston
for a visit and interview?   Jeff

	Nathaniel Jeppson <Njeppson@ALLENCO.COM>
	02/02/2001 06:20 PM

		 To: "'Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com'" <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: follow-up

Jeff,
Quick update.  I called Jeff to see if is going to be in NY next week, his
sec. said that he's out of the office today and apparently not scheduled to
be in NY next week.  I am hoping that we will talk soon.  No call for Per
(sp?) in the NY office.  Hope you are well,
Nat

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 2:30 PM
To: Njeppson@ALLENCO.COM
Subject: RE: follow-up

I saw him this morn, and asked if he called you.  call him tomorrow or
thurs, and i'll follow up......

Nathaniel Jeppson <Njeppson@ALLENCO.COM> on 01/23/2001 11:35:26 AM

To:   "'Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com'" <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: follow-up

Jeff,
Congratulations on yesterday's earnings release - the market reacted well.
Feedback I got from a large bank on the street is that they always
recommend
buying ENE in the weeks leading up to earings releases.  I don't want to be
a pain, but you had said to let you know if I had not heard from Jeff by
today.  I'm happy to be the one to make the call - just let me know.

Halley and Michael's opening was quite successfull and the show is great.
have fun in London.
Nat


Do either of you have a copy of the "Power of Attorney" which the four
municipal utilities granted to Energy New England LLC?  I seem to recall a
one or rwo paragraph document.  Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


I forgot one deferral that came through as a PMA in 0003 GL.  Please defer
$18,933 in expense(revenue entry) for Southern Union, production month 9911.
Shout with any questions.  Thanks.
PL


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Thought you might enjoy poking some fun at plove's hometown.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001
08:15 AM ---------------------------

Dobbs_Shane <Shane.Dobbs@fctg.com> on 05/04/2001 07:26:37 AM
To: beth <bethbyerley@yahoo.com>, Bev <BeverlyFulghum@andrewcollege.edu>,
Bonnie <tharpbl@eng.auburn.edu>, Bud <dobbsmw@auburn.edu>, chance
<chancewood@hotmail.com>, Emily <hamptone@booksamillion.com>, Fulford
<fulfordb@aol.com>, Jim <jwood@regionsbank.com>, Jult <JDobbs7792@aol.com>,
LD <gwave85@hotmail.com>, Linda <lulu@sonet.net>, Matt
<doobsie@bellsouth.net>, "Ms. Laura" <lebrown76@hotmail.com>, ONE-up
<dobbswn@auburn.edu>, Phil <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>, Robin
<robincass@hotmail.com>, Stacy <bearden@us.ibm.com>, Watch-it!
<melfrench3@aol.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: test answers

-----Original Message-----
From: Brooke [mailto:Brooke@megagate.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 5:10 PM
To: Dobbs_Shane
Subject: FWD: test answers

These are reported to be actual test answers from various schools in the
Huntsville, Alabama metropolitan area:
>
> Q: Name the four seasons.
> A: Salt, pepper, mustard and vinegar.
>
> Q: How is dew formed?
> A: The sun shines down on the leaves and makes them perspire.
>
> Q: What is a planet?
> A: A body of earth surrounded by sky.
>
> Q: What guarantees may a mortgage company insist on?
> A: If you are buying a house, they will insist you are well
> endowed.
>
> Q; Name a major disease associated with cigarettes.
> A: Premature death.
>
> Q: How can you delay milk turning sour?
> A: Keep it in the cow.
>
> Q: How are the main parts of the body categorized?
> A: The body is consisted into three parts - the brainium, the
> borax and = the
> abdominal cavity. The brainium contains the brain, the borax
> contains the heart and lungs and the abdominal cavity contains the
> five bowels, A, E, = I,
> O, and U.
>
> Q: What is the fibula?
> A: A small lie.
>
> Q: What does "varicose" mean?
> A: Nearby.
>
> Q: Give the meaning of the term "Caesarean Section."
> A: The caesarean section is a district in Rome.
>
> Q: What is a seizure?
> A: A Roman emperor.
>
> Q: What is a terminal illness?
> A: When you are sick at the airport.
>
> Q: Use the word "judicious" in a sentence to show you understand
> its meaning.
> A: Hands that judicious can be soft as your face.
>
> Q: What does the word "benign" mean?
> A: Benign is what you will be after you be eight.
>
> Q: What is a turbine?
> A: Something an Arab wears on his head.
>
> Q: What is a Hindu?
> A: It lays eggs.


*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Daily Riddle ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Today's Riddle is -

Using the numbers 1-9 (you can only use each number 1 time) can you
make 3 rows of 3 so that the sum total of all 3 digits in any
direction is 15?

As always, you will find the answer below today's sponsor.

Please take a moment and visit today's sponsor-

>< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< ><
HAVE A WEBSITE?
Free trial! Try LinkDoctor today. The Ultimate link
checker for Websites. Reports Broken Links, Search Engine
Ranking, Popularity, and broken links in Search Engines!
Be sure to tell your associates about this free trial.
www.assist.com
>< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< >< ><

The answer to today's Riddle is -

8 3 4
1 5 9
6 7 2

=============================================================

---
You are currently subscribed to riddles as: mike.grigsby@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-riddles-8238I@riddlesandmore.net


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2000
12:32 PM ---------------------------
   Carla Nguyen                06/20/2000 11:16 AM

To: Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Little/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Delma Salazar/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Troy
Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Pond/Corp/Enron@Enron, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Denver Financial Liquidations

Attached are the 04/00 financial liquidations for Denver.  Please refer to
the sheet with  "Recon Variances"  tab for the details supporting the summary
page.   Please communicate questions or adjustments to Jim Little or myself.
Thks!


Good afternoon.

This is to confirm the details for the subject meeting which will be held
on Thursday, December 7, 2000.

     Location: One i2 Place
               Red Conference Room, 4th Floor

     Contact:  Keith Larney
               469-357-4497

     Time:          8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
               Continental Breakfast and Lunch

Attendance has been confirmed by admins to the participants; however, if
there are any changes, please let me know as soon as possible.  Thank you.
____________________

Shea Dugger
Legal Dept.
Tel: 469-357-4195
Fax: 469-357-6566
shea_dugger@i2.com


Some comments, including a couple environmental ideas (that may not be
feasible--please check).

Jennifer Thome@ENRON
05/23/2001 08:13 AM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nancy
Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Talking points on gas in CA

Becky and Christi:

Attached are revised talking points on natural gas in CA.  I have made
revisions to reflect our discussion yesterday (e.g., no price caps, basis
differential is not explained by transportation costs, etc.).

As discussed, I hope to get input from the gas fundamentals group tomorrow
and finalize this document by Friday.

I welcome your feedback.

Jennifer
5-3550


Hanson Tipton
1030 West Forest Blvd.
Knoxville, TN 37909
tiptonhr@yahoo.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Hanson Tipton


Sorry for not responding.   I don't look at my email constantly through the
day.  Don't have much to do in Q/U still it widens back out.
Thanks,
John

slafontaine@globalp.com on 10/05/2000 01:05:27 PM
To: jarnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: aug/sep

i think your selling the whole curve-if your interested im .005 bid for 300
aug/sep ngas. let me know if your interested. dont let silverman get you into
too much trouble tonite


Attached are more articles that speak of the current California power crisis.

Mercury News Article primarily dealing with Governor Davis' view on the
situation and what he is doing to help solve the issue. Davis has a three
part plan: investigate price gouging, ask PUC to set up two-year plan to cut
rates in half and asked for voluntary conservation.

Asking Clinton to speed up a federal probe of apparent electricity
price-gouging by out-of-state power producers and called on state regulators;
A spokesman for the independent energy producers said his group welcomed a
federal investigation, saying it would determine that ``California simply
does not have enough generating and transmission capacity.''
To stabilize skyrocketing utility bills in San Diego; Davis called upon the
Public Utilities Commission on Wednesday to set up a two-year plan to cut
rates nearly in half for residential and business customers of San Diego Gas
& Electric.  Davis described his proposal as ``a rate-stabilization plan''
designed to lower bills. ;Nettie Hoge, executive director of The Utility
Reform Network, a consumer group, criticized Davis' plan. She said consumer
groups want the Legislature to freeze rates in San Diego at July 1999 levels.
Volunary actions: Davis joined with grocers to announce a voluntary program
to conserve power on extremely hot days, meaning lights in Bay Area
supermarkets would be dimmed and air conditioning dials set higher to cut
power use by 10 percent.
Davis contends that deregulation will work out, perhaps in three or four
years, when a dozen or more power plants in the pipeline start generating
electricity.

Mercury News article states it is not time to re-regulate the markets and
provides the following solutions to solve the crisis.
Matters will improve when California has:
-> More sources of power.
-> A more sophisticated electricity market.
-> Smarter consumers -- that is, consumers with the information they need to
be thrifty.
Also the article talks of the Power Exchange (PX) and the Independent System
Operators (ISO) and how these two groups are making the prices higher; i.e
market imperfections that result from the uniqueness of electricity as a
commodity and the immaturity of the new exchanges are enabling producers to
obtain higher prices than the underlying conditions dictate.
Article concludes by saying the deregulated market is just beginning and with
a few adjustments will work out fine

Mercury News article speaking of a new report commissioned by Governor Davis
on the energy crisis. The article is primarily about the following issues.
A report commissioned by Gov. Gray Davis concluded that deregulation is ``not
working,'' and recommended a series of actions, including asking the federal
government to help control prices.
The report was written by the president of the California Public Utilities
Commission and the chairman of the California Electricity Oversight Board and
made 30 recommendations to help ease the threat of power shortages and price
spikes.
Report suggested that  the state-mandated freeze on utility rates, which is
tentatively in place for PG&E customers through March 2002, might need to be
extended further.
The report also suggested the upgrading power transmission lines into San
Francisco and  hooking up businesses to a central command center via the
Internet, so their lobby lights and air conditioning could be turned off
automatically when state power supplies were low.
Two key state agencies, the Independent System Operator and the Power
Exchange, were criticized in the report. It accused the ISO and the Power
Exchangeof being unresponsive to the needs of consumers, in part because
their boards include people with ties to power companies. It also complained
that they did not provide key pricing and other data requested by the
report's authors to assess the state's energy problems.
Also in the article is a repsonse by the ISO and PX to the claims made in the
governor's report.


Please add TXU Energy Trading Company to list.  We had an old style "ERMS"
master in place, so they weren't allowed to do power, but now we have an ISDA
in place (even tho' Brant Reves threw out the new guaranty, but that is
another story!), so I am going to open them up for weather.


ok   so now that I read this email my last reply sounds just a bit air headed.  As will this comment...didn't know our friend Racicot was doing that.  Is he doing it on contract or was he named to some committee by W?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 7:09 PM
To:	Landwehr, Susan M.
Subject:	FW: CEC Report on Natural Gas Supplies Adopted

Hey infrastructure team mate.  I'm forwarding you some infrastructure stuff from the West.  Heard Marc Racicot's going to be negotiating timber trade with Canada.  That's something, huh?

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoen, Mary
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:58 AM
To:	Parquet, David; Wehn, Samuel; Comnes, Alan; Swain, Steve; Brodbeck, Kelly
Cc:	Keeler, Jeff; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject:	CEC Report on Natural Gas Supplies Adopted

The CEC just approved a report drafted by staff that states there will be adequate natural gas supply this winter for electricity generation needs.  It does qualify this statement by discussing where potential bottlenecks in delivery might occur and recommends actions to address the bottlenecks.  See below for a link to the report.

Mary Schoen
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
415.782.7803 (phone)
415.782.7854 (fax)

For immediate release: October 3, 2001
Contact: Claudia Chandler : 916-654-4989

Energy Commission Report Projects
Improved Natural Gas Supplies For the State

Sacramento -While current natural gas prices in California have dropped to approximately half of 2000's average price, the specter remains of last December, when tight supplies caused prices to spike to 25 times their present rates. Now, as winter approaches, industry watchers wonder if the State has enough of the clean-burning fuel for the upcoming heating season, even as new gas-fired electricity generators come on line.

The Natural Gas Infrastructure Issues Report , adopted today by a 4-to-0 vote of the California Energy Commission, gives a qualified "yes" to the question of adequate supplies this winter. It identifies sufficient storage as a critical factor, and notes that utilities have substantially increased natural gas storage, largely because conservation and efficiency have dampened summer electricity demand.

Nearly 85 percent of the natural gas used by Californians comes by pipeline from gas fields located outside the State. Since California typically uses more natural gas in the winter than interstate pipelines can provide, additional supplies must be set aside in summer months to help balance supply and demand. For this reason, the report recommends that the Energy Commission continuously assess storage levels and monitor infrastructure improvements throughout the year.

The newly adopted report points out that California's natural gas supply system was designed years ago to provide enough gas for winter's peak heating demand. An increasing reliance on natural gas for generating electricity, however, has strained the system and revised old patterns of consumption.

"This report helps Californians understand what we have to do to assure that we have a reliable and reasonably priced electricity and natural gas system in the future," said Energy Commissioner Michal (spelling correct) Moore, Presiding Member of the Electricity and Natural Gas Committee that developed the document.

To help resolve possible supply problems, the document analyzes not only natural gas storage requirements but the interstate pipelines that bring the fuel from distant gas fields to the California border. These pipelines can deliver slightly more natural gas than intra-state gas pipelines ? those within our State's borders ? can receive. As a result, there are bottlenecks in getting some supplies to gas consumers that the report says must be improved.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas) are improving and expanding their intra-state pipeline systems to help eliminate these constraints. According to the report, planned expansions of the interstate pipeline network should increase natural gas delivery to the State beginning next year, and additional improvements to the natural gas system should help prevent higher-than-normal prices that plagued California last winter.

Natural gas supplies in North America appear to be sufficient to meet demand in California and the rest of the United States for the next 50 years. The report recommends that the Energy Commission continue to monitor drilling rig activity and production levels for the long-term outlook. It also suggests that the Energy Commission, along with the Public Utilities Commission, should find ways to encourage and increase the in-state supply of natural gas.

The just adopted Natural Gas Infrastructure Issues Report can be found on the Energy Commission's Web Site at:

www.energy.ca.gov/contracts <http://www.energy.ca.gov/contracts>

Or report is attached:

 << File: Gas Infrastructure Report.pdf >>


Start Date: 3/31/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041609.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 9 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Attached is the Commission Agenda for the public meeting scheduled for March
28.

http://www.ferc.fed.us/public/isd/sunshine.htm

Please note below the items of interest:

CAG-5     Transwestern, several dockets relating to negotiated rate contracts
(RP97-288-009 thru 15)
CAG-15    Northern Border, RP01-267, order expected on new firm backhaul
proposal

Several dockets appear relating to emergency petitions for relief in the
California markets and requests to reinstitute price caps between pipelines
and LDCs, hedging of capacity rights (El Paso), and abuses charged by
SoCalGas against El Paso at its Topock delivery point.

CAG-28     San Diego Gas & Electric, LA Dept of Water, Natl Asso. of Gas
Consumers v. Sellers of Natural Gas, RP01-180
CAG-37     CPUC v. El Paso, RP00-241
CAG-38    SoCalGas v. El Paso, RP01-27

Two dockets concern ROFR rights

CAG-29    Tennessee Gas, RP01-20
CAG-34     Algonquin Gas, RP00-533 and Texas Eastern, RP00-535

CAG-2     Tennessee Gas, RP01-239 (Extended Delivery/ Extended Receipt
Service ) new service)
CAG-35    Williams Gas, RP93-109 (rehearing requested in remand concerning
PCB)

Three electric dockets may be of interest:

CAE-13    GridFlorida, RT01-67 (expect order on RTO filing)
CAE-21    Florida Municipal Power v. Florida Power & Light, TX93-4
(compliance filing contested relating to order directing FPL
               to provide network services to FMPA
CAE-39    Southwest Power Pool/Entergy, RT01-34 and 75 (expect order on RTO
filing)

No discussion topics noted.


I am excited to announce a major initiative called iBuyit, a new online
purchase and payment tool.  Each of you will be able to use iBuyit to order
or approve purchases from pens to pipe and cable to computers.  Our Global
Strategic Sourcing (GSS) and Global Accounting groups have teamed up with
each of your Business Units to build a tool designed to meet your specific
needs.

Special iBuyit features include:
? An eCatalog to help you quickly find the items you need
? Shopping baskets to store your purchases
? Simple recurring purchases
? Automatic routing of invoices for coding and approval

iBuyit will be implemented in stages across ETS, EBS, EES, EWS, Corporate and
Europe during 2001.

Over the next few months, you will be hearing more about iBuyit from your
business unit leadership, including what it can do for you and when you can
expect to use it.


Start Date: 1/8/02; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010814.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: 199.88 / Final: 199.85)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/8/02
  SC_ID: ENRJ


READ DASOVICH'S SUMMARY WHICH FOLLOWS THE PRESS RELEASE BELOW.  gac

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:53 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Kean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg; Mellencamp, Lisa; Comnes, Alan
Subject:	PUC Press Release Announcing Deal with Edison
Importance:	High

PUC and Edison Settle Federal litigation to maintain utility service without raising rates
The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and Southern California Edison (Edison) today reached a settlement in the Filed Rate Doctrine lawsuit Edison filed in federal court against the PUC.  The settlement is intended to restore Edison to creditworthiness so that it is able to resume procuring the electricity needed by its customers; limit ratepayers' costs of paying off the debt; and maintain the state's role in regulating the investor owned utility by enabling Edison to pay down its back debts over a reasonable, certain period of time.  The terms of the Settlement Agreement include:
?	Edison will apply cash on hand, plus all of its revenue over recoverable costs, to paying off its back debt.  The PUC and Edison have agreed that the amount of the back debt to be recovered from ratepayers is the amount of certain outstanding debt Edison had at August 31, 2001, less the cash on hand on that date, less an additional $300 million adjustment.  The amount that will be paid down pursuant to the settlement agreement is estimated to be $3 billion as of the end of this month.  The parties believe that the amount to be paid by ratepayers will be much less than the cap.
?	Edison will not pay any dividends on its common stock through 2003, or on the full payment of its debt, if sooner.  If Edison has not fully paid its back debt by the end of 2003, the Commission retains the discretion to determine whether Edison will pay a dividend in 2004.  Edison is free to resume paying dividends in 2005. Since Edison's annual dividend has typically been about $400 million, Edison's shareholders will have forgone at least $1.2 billion in dividends and possibly more, in addition to the $300 million adjustment.
?	Edison will apply 100% of any recovery it obtains from refund proceedings at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or litigation against sellers to pay down the back debt.  Edison commits through court order to work with the PUC and the Attorney General in pursuing litigation against the energy sellers.
?	The PUC can direct Edison to use $150 million each year for other utility purposes, including the provision of additional energy efficiency monies, which would otherwise be used to pay down the Edison debt.
?	The PUC agrees not to lower Edison's retail rates below their current level through the end of 2003 unless the back debts are recovered.  However, rates may be reduced as a result of a securitization of the debt or reduced DWR revenue needs.
?	The PUC agrees to set rates not higher than the current rate, to enable Edison to recover the remaining amount of the back debt over 2004 and 2005 if Edison's back debt has not been recovered by the end of 2003.
?	There are no concessions of PUC or State regulations or regulatory authority over Edison, nor is there any deregulation of valuable transmission and generation facilities.
?	Edison may make up to $900 million in capital expenditures annually.
"This settlement embodies a fair and judicious way for Edison to become solvent and get back in the business of buying power, while meeting the needs of ratepayers and the state of California," said Loretta Lynch, President of the PUC.  "The settlement also ensures that all of the benefits of any refunds arising through litigation against power generators and marketers that profited from unjust and unreasonable energy prices will benefit ratepayers."
This agreement settles a November 2000 federal court lawsuit filed by Edison against the PUC, in which Edison claimed that the Commission's actions in not providing sufficient retail rates, violated federal law and was an unconstitutional taking of its property.  Under this agreement, Edison will release the PUC from all claims in its lawsuit and will also withdraw any challenges to the Commission's decisions implementing AB 1X, AB 6X, and the TURN accounting proposal.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:42 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Kean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg; Mellencamp, Lisa; Comnes, Alan
Subject:	California Update--10.02.01:Part 2:  PUC Approves Edison Bailout

In another surprise move, the PUC approved an Edison bailout today on a 5-0 vote.  This item was not on the Commission's agenda other than as a placeholder regarding "litigation."  We do not have copies of the agreement but we just talked to Edison's SVP of Regulatory Affairs and here's a summary:

The Commission will keep current rates in place through 2003
Any "overcollection" resulting from keeping current rates in place will go to paying off $3.3 B in Edison's past due accounts (the so-called "undercollection")
If Edison collects the $3.3B prior to 2003, then rates can change
If Edison has not collected the $3.3 B by the end of 2003, the PUC will create a dedicated rate component on all bills to collect the remainder.  Half the remainder will be collected in 2004 and the other half in 2005.
Any refunds received from litigation against suppliers will go to reducing the $3.3 B undercollection.
Edison can keep 10% of any refunds received after the $3.3B is paid off.
Edison cannot pay any dividends during the time that it is using rates to pay off the $3.3B.
Edison can apply to the PUC for approval to hedge gas price risk.
Edison will be protected from any increases in DWR contract costs (i.e., if DWR's costs go up, the PUC will raise rates rather than take it out of Edison's rates)
The PUC will not fine Edison during this period if Edison's capital structure varies from the PUC-approved capital structure
Edison must drop its lawsuits against the PUC regarding 1) the "filed rate doctrine" and 2) the so-called "TURN" accounting method, which effectively kept the rate freeze in place.
Edison agrees to "cooperate" with the Attorney General and the PUC in all litigation against suppliers.
The PUC decision could likely nullify the need for the "special" session that the Governor recently announced

We will report back with additional details as soon as we get them.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	California Update--10.02.01:  PUC Turns Down Davis' Proposed Rate Agreement with DWR

In what will likely be viewed as a fairly shocking event, the California PUC today voted down Davis' proposed rate agreement between DWR and the CPUC.
The vote was 4-1, with the two Republicans voting with Davis' hand-picked appointees Lynch and Wood.
Davis' proposal was introduced at the meeting by another Davis appointee--Geoff Brown--who made a lengthy speech about why California would experience economic and political destruction if the PUC did not approve Davis' proposed rate agreement.

What is Davis' proposed rate agreement between DWR and the CPUC?
It would remove all PUC authority to review any contracts between DWR with suppliers.
It would require the PUC to pass through to utility rates all DWR power contract costs, no questions asked.

What are the implications of the move by the PUC to reject Davis' proposal?
With the vote, it remains unclear how California/DWR will pay for the DWR power contracts.
The political pressure to re-negotiate--or break--the DWR power contracts is likely to intensify considerably.
It remains unclear how California/DWR will pay for the $12.5 B in bonds the Treasurer has unsuccessfully attempted to issue for past several months.
Under the structure devised by Davis, the revenues flowing from the CPUC/DWR rate agreement would be used to both 1) pay for the DWR power contracts and 2) service the bonds the Treasurer is trying to issue to repay California's General Fund for spot and other short term power purchased by DWR since January.
In short, there is no clear indication of how California will pay for DWR contracts or issue the bonds.
Safe to say that today's PUC vote has seriously embarrassed Davis, and left his approach to "solving" California electricity crisis in shambles.

What Next?
A broad left-right coalition of energy interests supported a bill (18XX) that passed the Legislature with broad bi-partisan support.
The bill would create a "dedicated rate component" on every customers bill to service the $12.5 B in bonds that the Treasurer wants to issue.
Proponents of the bill--and just about everyone else--argue that the "dedicated rate component" is a signficantly more efficient way to raise the debt California needs to plug the hole in its budget.
The bill is silent, however, on how California would pay for the DWR contracts, and the bill's opponents claim that the power suppliers will sue as a result.
All four PUC commissioners who voted against the Davis rate agreement today urged Davis to sign the bill.  The left-right coalition (from Nader types to oil companies) is also working hard to get Davis to sign it.
Davis has said that he will veto the bill on the advice of the Treasurer and bond counsel.
Given today's vote, however, Davis may have no alternative than to sign the bill if he wants to get the bonds issued and the state budget repaid.

Update on Edison Bailout
Still appears that chances are very small that Edison and Davis will succeed in getting the Legislature to vote for an Edison bailout when it returns for another "special" session next Tuesday.

If you have any questions, just let us know.

Best,
Jeff


This request has been pending your approval for  45 days.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000024686&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000024686
Request Create Date : 3/21/01 8:04:40 AM
Requested For       : juan.padron@enron.com
Resource Name       : TradeWave QUERY INFO ONLY
Resource Type       : Applications


Based on your feedback, Reliant will host a meeting of the Collateral Annex
Group on August 7 and a meeting of the Drafting Committee on August 8.
Details to follow.

Andrew S. Katz, Director Industry Legal Affairs
Edison Electric Institute
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20004
Voice:  202-508-5616
Fax:     202-508-5673
e-mail:  akatz@eei.org
 - TEXT.htm
 - Andy Katz.vcf


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 12:05
PM ---------------------------
   Michele Winckowski @ ENRON                12/12/2000 09:53 AM

To:
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: angel

this is cute.

  Not long ago and far away, Santa was getting ready for his annual
  trip...but there were problems everywhere. Four of his elves got sick, and
  the trainee elves did not produce the toys as fast as the regular ones so
  Santa was beginning to feel the pressure of being behind schedule.

  Then Mrs. Claus told Santa that her mom was coming to visit. This stressed
  Santa even more.

  When he went to harness the reindeer, he found that three of them were
  about to give birth and two had jumped the fence and were out, heaven
  knows where. More Stress.

  Then when he began to load the sleigh, one of the boards cracked and the
  toy bag fell to the ground and scattered the toys.

  Totally frustrated, Santa went into the house for a cup of coffee and a
  shot of whiskey. When he went to the cupboard, he found the elves had hit
  the liquor and there was nothing to drink. In his frustration, he dropped
  the coffee pot and it broke into hundreds of little pieces all over the
  kitchen floor. He went to get the broom and found that mice had eaten the
  straw it was made from.

  Just then the door bell rang and Santa cussed on his way to the door.

  He opened the door and there was a little angel with a great big Christmas
  tree.

  The angel said: "Where would you like to put this tree fat man?"

  And that my friend, is how the little angel came to be on top of the
  Christmas tree.


Starting tomorrow, 11/28/01 we will be included with the Gas Breakfast and Lunches.  However, there will be a cost of $5.00 each or $10.00 total when breakfast is provided.  They will have lunch everyday and breakfast only three days of the month, which will be during bid week.

I will come around every morning and collect your money...I will then have to provide a list to the Gas people who will be checking your name off as you enter the breakfast/lunch line.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

REMEMBER...ONLY THOSE WHO GIVE THE $5.00 WILL BE EATING.

Thanks for your cooperation,

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


Why don't we try 10 ish for coffee or brunch or whatnot?

My cell is 503-701-2894 just in case.

Can't wait!

C

-----Original Message-----
From: Broughton, Susan [mailto:susan.broughton@avistacorp.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:20 AM
To: Semperger, Cara
Subject: RE: Thanksgiving weekend

I would love to get together with you - Saturday would be probably the best
time because my company plans on leaving Saturday morning - call me at
466-5573(my home number) so we can do lunch or something.

-----Original Message-----
From: Semperger, Cara [mailto:Cara.Semperger@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:16 AM
To: sbroughton@avistacorp.com
Subject: Thanksgiving weekend

Hi Susan,

I am going to be in Spokane from Wednesday Night thru Sunday morning, I
would really like to get together for coffee or something.

Are you going to be in town?

Cara

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Gentlemen,

I'm with EWS Legal, and I'm working with John Llodra (East Power origination)
concerning a confidentiality agreement with Ameresco.  The proposed
transaction is described as follows:

 A potential power plant site development and asset management services
related to the Island End Generation Project, a nominal  365 MW combined
cycle power generation facility, proposed to be located in Everett,
Massachusetts.

The current draft of the CA contains this language:

 From the time of the signing of this Agreement until October 1, 2001 neither
Party shall pursue the Proposed Transaction without  the participation of the
other Party, unless the other Party consents in writing or notifies the other
Party that it does not intend to   pursue the Proposed Transaction.

In accordance with policy, this issue is being submitted to you for your
review.

John can be contacted at 978 449 9936.  My extension is 57566.

Thank you,

Kay

Here is the entire CA:


Congratulations!!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Diamond, Russell
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 12:24 PM
Subject:	Contact Info

Hello folks,

I have accepted a position with RWE Trading Americas, my last day with ENRQ will be next Thursday, Jan 31.  I have enjoyed working with all of you and hope that our paths will cross as we find our way to more exciting ventures.

Russell
ridiamond@yahoo.com
713-665-3345


Couple of additional pieces of information:

In conjunction with the issue paying ESPs past due PX amounts, Edison has affirmed that it will be making a proposal regarding how it wants to calculate the PX credit going forward.
It remains unclear whether Edison will try to fold controversial issues into negotiations on getting paid past due PX credit amounts(e.g., PX credit contributed to undercollection and therefore DA customers should help pay down the undercollection; DA customers must pay for stranded DWR contracts, etc.).
So while Edison is making good noises about wanting to settle (which is a certainly a step in the right direction), it's still unclear whether they intend to attach terms to the deal that make the whole thing a nonstarter.
Got a call into John Fielder to try to get answers to some of these questions.
Will report back when (and if) we get some answers.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 5:27 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; 'Mike Day (E-mail)'
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	RE: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy

With respect to past due PX credit amounts, Edison has told folks today that:

Edison will distribute a one-pager by mid-day tomorrow laying out its proposal for how to handle payment of past due PX credit amounts.
Edison is trying to meet individually with all ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th prehearing conference at the PUC to discuss and hopefully reach agreement with ESPs on its proposal.
Edison hopes to make progress with the ESPs between now and the Nov. 7th prehearing conference, and if so, intends to tell the judge that the PUC should delay action on the complaints pending settlement.

We'll distribute Edison's proposal as soon as we get it.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 8:04 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; Mike Day (E-mail)
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy

Following last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on how to proceed with SCE.

1.	Form Enron Negotiation Team

	My recommendation is to use the same team we used with PG&E + Jeff Dasovich.  My understanding was that Lisa M. was the lead negotiator - I would not change this.  Jeff should only be there to make introductions.

2.	Meet & Confer (10/29)

	Sue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back to everyone on what happens.

3.	Reformed Stipulation

	I would propose that we take a wait and see approach to this document.  Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride.

4.	Meeting

	My understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE can meet with us this Thursday.  Can everyone make it that needs to be there?  Probably meet in California.  We should put the laundry list on the table.

Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone disagrees.

Thanks,

Jim


schedule 30 min to sit down with me either mon or tues after 430.  if you want to get info, sending out an email survey is not the right way.  much easier to respond to a question in voice rather than typing it out.

<cwomack@rice.edu> on 04/09/2001 04:17:59 PM
To:	jarnold@enron.com
cc:	cwomack@rice.edu
Subject:	EnronOnline competitor questionnaire

Hello Mr. Arnold,

Thank you for speaking with me today with Kenneth Parkhill.  Unfortunately,
none of my teammates are available to meet with you today.  Would you please
review our questionnaire and reply back to me with your comments about the
questionnaire and answers to any questions that apply to your work.

We will follow up with you later this week if we have questions.  Thank you
for your help.

Charles Womack
2002 Rice MBA Candidate
281-413-8147
cwomack@rice.edu

 - Questionnaire.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
11:29 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           01/11/2001 11:24 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
11:26 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           12/29/2000 10:40 AM

To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

For the roundtable:

Gas:  John Arnold, Phillip Allen, Mike Grigsby, maybe Hunter Shively
Pwr:  Fletch Sturm, Rogers Hearndon, maybe Kevin Presto
Oil:  John Nowlan, Bill White, maybe Adam Gross
Coal/Emissions:  Kevin Mcgowan
Equities:  Gary Hickerson, Michael Bradley
Other:  Vince Kaminski, Jen Fraser

Have I left anyone off?  What do you think?


Krishna,

Please,  confirm with Hill Huntington.

Vince

Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
03/19/2001 09:28 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: RTP project

Yes, I would be definitely interested. Count me and Osman also to
participate. I will forward your email to others in EES who might be
interested also.
Krishna.

Vince J Kaminski
03/19/2001 08:12 AM
To: John Henderson/HOU/EES@EES, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RTP project

John and Krishna,

I am sending you an outline of a conference at Stanford on topics related to
demand-side pricing and management in the power markets.

Please, let me know if you are personally interested and who else
in your respective  organizations would like to attend.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
08:10 AM ---------------------------

Hill Huntington <hillh@stanford.edu> on 03/15/2001 05:26:55 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RTP project

Vince,

Targetted conference date is Th-F June 21-22 at Stanford.  Enclosed in the
recent revision to what I sent before.

Great to meet you,
Hill

 - retail notes.rtf
*******************************************************************
Hillard G. Huntington
EMF - an international forum on
energy and environmental markets Voice:  (650) 723-1050
408 Terman Center    Fax:    (650) 725-5362
Stanford University   Email:  hillh@stanford.edu
Stanford, CA  94305-4026

EMF Website: http://www.stanford.edu/group/EMF/


-----Original Message-----
From: Nolen Glaze [SMTP:nglaze@oilstates.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 10:33 AM
To: 'BIGSHAWN'; 'Bill G. (h)'; 'Bill G. (w)'; 'DANIEL'; Frank Evans (E-mail);
Robbie Tidwell (E-mail); Robert Pearson (E-mail); Trace Rich (E-mail)
Subject:

From: Frank Banda <fbanda@oilstates.com>
To: "Ben Dedman (E-mail)" <bdedman@oilstates.com>, "Craig Wilks (E-mail)"
<cwilks@oilstates.com>, "James Milam (E-mail)"  <jmilam@oilstates.com>, "John
Martin (E-mail)"  <jmartin@oilstates.com>, "Juan Gutierrez (E-mail)"
<jgutierrez@oilstates.com>, "Nolen Glaze Jr. (E-mail)"  <nglaze@oilstates.com>
To: "Robbie Tidwell (E-mail)" <rtidwell@oilstates.com>, "Trace Rich (E-mail)"
<trich@oilstates.com>, "Robert Pearson (E-mail)" <rpearson@oilstates.com>
Subject: FW: COME ON SUMMER......
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:02:55 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----
=_NextPart_001_01C0A7BD.FF9CD660"

Subject: FW: COME ON SUMMER......

>  <<bk-305.jpg>>  <<bk-323.jpg>>  <<bk-330.jpg>>  <<bk-364.jpg>>
> <<bk-407.jpg>>  <<bk-411.jpg>>  <<bk-418.jpg>>

 - bk-305.jpeg
 - bk-323.jpeg
 - bk-330.jpeg
 - bk-364.jpeg
 - bk-407.jpeg
 - bk-411.jpeg
 - bk-418.jpeg
From: Frank Banda <fbanda@oilstates.com>
To: "Craig Wilks (E-mail)" <cwilks@oilstates.com>, "James Milam (E-mail)"
<jmilam@oilstates.com>, "John Martin (E-mail)"  <jmartin@oilstates.com>,
"MARIA (E-mail)" <mouelett@enron.com>, "Nolen Glaze Jr. (E-mail)"
<nglaze@oilstates.com>, "Robbie Tidwell (E-mail)" <rtidwell@oilstates.com>
To: "ROBERTA (E-mail)" <ROBERTA L VILLEGAS@reliantenergy.com>, "Tammie
Stuckey (E-mail)" <tstuckey@oilstates.com>, "Trace Rich (E-mail)"
<trich@oilstates.com>
Subject: FW: More Hilton  Funnies
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:06:53 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----
=_NextPart_001_01C0A7BE.02FC7C20"

Subject: FW: More Hilton  Funnies

>
>
> Really Enjoy <<DonkeyKick.mpg>>

 - DonkeyKick.mpeg


I won't be able to attend.  Let me know if I need to be hooked up by phone or
if you will just brief me afterward.

Paul Kaufman@ECT
12/28/99 04:42 PM
To: kfullenweider@velaw.com, Ann Ballard/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
mtaylor@ei.enron.com, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Testimony in PGE Proceeding

Sierra called today to inform us that they intend to complete their internal
review of the Oregon PUC filing by the beginning of next week.   They want
our input by the end of next week, and to that end are scheduling a meeting
in Reno for either 1/5 or 1/6.  Please let me know if you plan on attending
the meeting.


1-Is there anything left to do to change the name under the LLC agreement to
enovate?
   2-I am attaching the overview cash protocol that was discussed during our
meeting with Treasury, Accounting and Finance.  Who can begin crafting a
services agreement around this template?

That's it for this moment.

Thanks,

Gregg


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Attached please find the revised Transfer and Assumption Agreement.  Please
note
that in the interest of time I am sending this document to all parties
simultaneously, thus there may be additional comments.  For your convenience,
I
am attaching both a clean copy and a marked version showing changes from the
most recent draft you received.

Best regards,

Kate Polozie

Katarina B. Polozie
McDermott, Will & Emery
kpolozie@mwe.com
(202) 756-8130
(See attached file: WDC99_407408_1.DOC)

(See attached file: WDC99_406261_9.DOC)

******************************************************************************
*******

This message is a PRIVATE communication.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to
others.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this
message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.
******************************************************************************
*******

For more information on McDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY please visit our website at:
http://www.mwe.com/

 - WDC99_407408_1.DOC
 - WDC99_406261_9.DOC


Hi Mark,

To follow-up, I have been SUPER super-swamped.

Do you have a time table for getting the lawyer you want to hire to replace
me for the Enron Corp. matters?

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/


Dave Steiner informed me we got the servers back so there should be no issues tonight.

ryan


I was tired of the "softball" subject line
ok, its been a while since you have heard from me, mostly because i have been
out of the office and also out of town.  so, without further delay, i need to
get some $money$ from you guys so we can get registered.  here then is the
deal, i need $60 from each of you to cover the fee, game balls, new bats, and
fees for a practice field.  i also need it fairly quickly, so sorry to pass
on my deadlines to you guys, but hey payday is coming up.  you can send me a
check at home which is
chris hartman
4936 SW 60th Place, #2
Portland, OR 97221
or you can call me at home at 503-296-0782 or at work at 503-273-0361 and we
can make arrangements.  i will come by your house if i have to or if you guys
want to meet me downtown for some happy hour we can do that to.  whatever it
takes, and i will go out of my way to accomodate you.  once we are
registered, i will then want to find out what people want to do as far as
practices go.  since last years practices were such a rousing success (the
best one had 6 people show up) i want to get your input so we dont waste time
or money.  and i also want to do some batting cages.  anyways i'm getting
ahead of myself, just show me the money.  and let me know if you have any
questions.
chris


Steve/Malcom

	We just moved into Enron Center South and the following people are not able to print from their unix account.
Can you please let us know what we need to do so that we are able to print A.S.A.P. here are the UNIX ID accounts
and the printer names that they need to be connected to:

bjones7_pc		Beech Grove
molney_pc		Beech Grove
jtaylor1_pc		Beech Grove
bmills_pc		Beech Grove
spalmer_pc		Beech Grove
ebrady_pc		Beech Grove
jdoan_pc		Beech Grove
kfowler		Augusta
mvidetto		Banks
JHUNGERF		Augusta
afay2_pc		Augusta
sriordan_pc		Augusta
stackett_pc		Augusta
aworthin_pc		Augusta
skulic_pc		Augusta
shopkin2_pc		Augusta
kclause		Augusta
makers		Augusta
cfrank2_pc		Augusta
despey		Augusta
bpehliva_pc		Augusta
rbhatia_pc		Augusta
crabon_pc		Banks
rorourke		Augusta
scastro2_pc		Banks
pryder			Banks
ryeboah		Banks
acavazos		Beech Grove
dbailey		Beech Grove
MNELSON3		Beech Grove
lvargas2		Beech Grove

If you have any questions or queries please feel free to call me at ext. 39588.

Thank you,
Elizabeth


If you want me to take care of her, let me know.  I'm not scared of her
either!

Shanna Husser@ENRON
02/25/2000 03:15 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:

OK- you don't think that the roommate is a little bit touchy about the time
that you and I have been spending together?!?!?  See what I have to deal
with.  Knowing full and well that when she was dating Chad- I literally went
6 days without seeing her.
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron on 02/25/2000
03:12 PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Christen :" <ccampbel@tosco.com> on 02/25/2000 03:00:36 PM
To: "'Shanna.Husser@enron.com'" <Shanna.Husser@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE:

I think I can call him your boyfriend because you are spending every minute
outside of work with him.

> -----Original Message-----


Thank you for your help.

From: Tana Jones on 08/31/2000 11:23 AM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: electronic copies of the EOL Registration documents

Per the emails below, it appears you are looking for the Legal and Privacy
Statement.  Mark T. said Leslie just revised it for the online team.  Leslie
is on vacation until the 9th, but I think attached below may be the latest
draft.  It is located in her "Online" subdirectory, under "Phase 2".

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000 11:20 AM -----

	Stephanie Sever
	08/31/2000 09:31 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: electronic copies of the EOL Registration documents

Tana,

Do you know what this information is?

Thanks,
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000
09:28 AM ---------------------------
From: Alan Aronowitz on 08/31/2000 09:24 AM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd
Ballengee/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: electronic copies of the EOL Registration documents

Thanks, but we already have the electronic copies of ETA/PA referenced. What
we currently need is a word version of the Legal and Privacy Statement. Could
you send?

Thanks, Alan

	Dale Neuner
	08/31/2000 08:14 AM

		 To: Frank Davis, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Ballengee/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: electronic copies of the EOL Registration documents

Frank/Stephanie -

Can you forward the PA and ETA to Todd, please.

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000 07:13
AM ---------------------------

Todd Ballengee@ENRON
08/30/2000 07:42 PM
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: electronic copies of the EOL Registration documents

Dale,

Alan Aronowitz gave me your name as someone to get in touch with who might
have an electronic copy of the EOL registration documents.  As I explained in
my voice mail today, CommodityLogic, an Enron company, is setting up a web
site that will require users to register to use the site.  We were hoping to
leverage the work that EOL has already done in this area.

If you have the legal documents and/or registration documents could you
please forward them to me as soon as possible.  We want to add these things
to our web site (after we change the text to fit our needs) which is going
live Friday - so as far in advance as you can get them to us the better.  If
you do not have the documents could you please let me know or forward this
note (cc'ing me) to the person you think may have them.

Thanks for your help.

Todd


Mark,

Just ensuring you are in agreement with what I am seeing in Brazil:

- Andrea Bertone is legal counsel in Brazil who is working with you on
EnronOnline.
- Pinherio Neto is outside legal counsel for EnronOnline in Brazil.

Dave


You should talk to Jess about that, she is due March 2 but I am not sure when her mom is coming and going.  I would think that the 2 week in march is good though.  Look forward to seeing you tomorrow.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Livia_Zufferli@Monitor.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, December 21, 2001 9:48 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	quick question

when is jessica due?  i want to book tickets out to see you guys in feb /
march, but i want to make sure that you have time to get settled before i
come.  i have to order tickets by dec 24th, as ali has a special 2 for 1
coupon so he can come with me too.

what timing is best?


Hey Everybody!!!

Justin Zachary Lyons was born on November 5, 2001.  8 lbs 12.5 oz.  He
had his first check up yesterday and is now 9lbs.  ( A chubby buddy just
like his daddy!)

He is a great baby and Hannah is "adjusting" to not having moms full
attention every day.

Take Care

Jeff


To:	Associate/Analyst Program Worldwide

From:	Ken Lay	Department:	Office of the Chairman

Subject:	Associate/Analyst Program	Date:	August 22, 2001

As most of you know, Jeff Skilling created the Associate/Analyst Program in 1990.  This Program is one of his most successful and important contributions to Enron, and will continue as a cornerstone of the Company.  It remains our single most important source of new talent.

The purpose of this memo is to reassure you that the direction, philosophy, and importance of the Program remains unchanged.  As we have said many times, most of our new businesses were created by graduates and members of the Program.  Many of the current leaders of our company are also graduates of the Program.

Three broad principles will continue to guide the direction of the Program.
?	We will have only one Associate/Analyst Program at Enron, and it is a Company asset.
?	We will have a "One Enron" presence on campus to provide clarity of message and purpose.
?	The Program is rotational in nature, and will prepare our future leaders for success by providing exposure to Enron's network of people and systems.

The business prospects for Enron, and the opportunities for personal growth and development have never been better.  We also enjoy the deepest and broadest talent pool we have ever had.  Each and every one of you can be a key contributor to making Enron the World's Leading Company.

cc:
Billy Lemmons - Associate/Analyst Program
John Sherriff - Associate/Analyst Committee Chair
Management Committee
Associate/Analyst Committee
Associate/Analyst Department
Human Resources Leads
Program PRC Reps
Program Supervisors

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Please get me Pat Wood's phone number and post a reminder on my calendar to
call him ASAP


I will be staying with my parents for the next few weeks.  Their address is:

37820 TH 38
Woodsfield, Ohio 43793

The phone number is 740-472-1289.

I will forward my new permanent address to you later.

Thanks.

Lisa


On October 2, I, Aaron Klem and our outside attorney, Jeanne Bennett, met with other ESPs, the utilities, and the Energy Division staff of the CPUC to hammer out an agreement on implementing the CPUC's order suspending direct access (DA) and handling continued submission of DASRs.

It was news to the utilities that ESPs have many contracts --  most several years old -- that allow for addition and subtraction of facilities throughout the contract term.  The utilities had thought that cutting off DASRs would be the best way to enforce the CPUC's order without having to review contracts (which they don't want to do). After much discussion and debate, the participants agreed to make a joint filing at the CPUC seeking quick action.

Most agreed on the following plan (with the CPUC staff to check on the appropriate procedural vehicle):
We will endeavor to reach agreement on a joint filing at the CPUC to modify Rule 22 (the rule that governs CPUC/ESP interactions) (a Petition to Modify was also discussed as a vehicle) - a small working group of attorneys has been set up to draft this.  The group includes Jeanne Bennett and Dian Grueneich, who represents UC/CSU.
The new Rule 22 will add a section that acknowledges the CPUC action and sets forth therein (or in an Appendix) a verification procedure.
Each ESP will submit a list of customers by this Friday, October 5, for ALL contracts -- existing and new -- to each utility. It will be diificult and perhaps impossible to add customers later, so be complete.
Each ESP will submit to each utility the account level information for each customer on the list by November 1. All customer accounts should be on this list including facilities that have not yet been switched to DA, but may be switched sometime in the future.  Also, to the extent customers have plans for new facilities, put them on the list -- even if we do not yet have account information. Anyone who has the right to add DA later needs to be on the list.
Any DASR submitted for an account on the November 1 list will be accepted by the utilities -- no matter when it is submitted.
Additional accounts not on the November 1 list can be added through a verification process, such as an affidavit submitted by the ESP or by both the ESP and the customer.  This process is being worked out by the attorney working group.
The CPUC will be asked to approve this approach quickly.

There is risk that the CPUC will NOT approve the approach and will cutoff DASRs on some date certain, in which case legal action would be required to allow for futher submission of DASRs. Steve Roskow of CPUC Energy Division said the CPUC has two factions -- one wants to cut off DA and the other wants it to continue.  He could not guarantee how the CPUC will respond to the joint approach.  He also mentioned that there are many lawyers at the CPUC looking at the retoactivity issue and the Commission's ability to affect existing contracts. Several participants, including Enron, UC/CSU and APSES, made strong statements about the legal problems the CPUC would face if they go down that road.

The utilities will be making a filing at the CPUC tomorrow that describes the steps they have taken to enforce the order.  PG&E and SDG&E will discuss the meeting and the joint plan -- PG&E may also say it will stick with some DASR cutoff date unless it hears otherwise from the CPUC.  SCE did not attend the meeting in person and at the end made clear that they had not agreed with the joint plan.  SCE is sticking with its original plan -- a customer and account list by September 24 and a DASR cutoff of October 20, no DASR accepted unless the name is on the customer list. The Energy Division staff is trying to move SCE off this position but I believe it comes from "on high."  We'll take our own run at it through a higher level at SCE. For now, we should continue to submit DASRs and follow the proposed joint plan and just keep records of our interactions with SCE (and the other utilities as well). If the situation does not improve in the next few days, we will reassess.

There is also the risk that the CPUC will not act on the joint approach quickly, leaving these issues in limbo and the utilities assuming "risk" that they have done the wrong thing and will be "punished." Not surprisingly, the utilities seem to favor a drop dead date for DASR submission, as a way to minimize this risk.  During the course of the meeting, the utilities mentioned a "compromise" of January 1, 2002 for a DASR cutff date.  They thought this would give the CPUC time to act on the joint plan, but allow them to minimize their risk in the event the CPUC decides that the utilities should have cutoff DASRs from the beginning.  This notion may appear in the filings to be made tomorrow.  I told them that any drop-dead date for DASR submission would be unacceptable to Enron. UC/CSU said the same.  A few ESPs seemed ready to accept the 1/1/02 cutoff but most do not.

Call with any questions.

Sue Mara
(415) 782-7802


John,

Thanks for your outlines.  Here are a couple of others that aren't kid
related.  The Choice is just 1 small piece but I love it.  Actually,  The
Choice moved me so much, I sold my piece of the business (Excel)  and
returned to Enron -  the rest is history.

Enjoy,
Mike

PS - We are way to similar!


Hey,

I thought since it was the beginning of the week and you were probably
feeling a little tired and stressed, I would send an encouraging message to
help you through your day. I hope this helps. have a wonderful day.

 - ponch1.jpg


Attached is the November 2000 nomination for our takes under the Gas Sales and
Purchase Contract between TXU Fuels (previously TUFCO) and SDS.  Please advise
should you have any questions concerning the attached.

Thanks,
CCS

       (See attached file: SDSNOM.xls)

 - SDSNOM.xls


Dear Sr. Rivera,

I'm writing on behalf of Mr. Jeff Skilling in response to your e-mail below.

Mr. Skilling is very interested in meeting with Sr. Rafael Miranda.
Unfortunately, he does not have any planned trips to Europe within the next
couple of months, though that may change after the first of the year.  If,
however, Sr. Miranda has any plans to be stateside, I would be happy to
arrange a time for the two of them to meet.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

"Rivera Novo, Luis" <lrivera@endesa.es> on 12/03/2000 01:58:58 PM
To: JEFFREY K. SKILLING (Correo electr?nico) <jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: contact

> Dear Jeff,
>
> Although I don't think we've met each other in person, we've been together
> in McKinsey for at least several years. I joined the Firm in 86 and left
> in 98 to become EVP at Endesa. Since then, we have had sporadic contacts
> with your people at this side of the Atlactic, specifically with Marc
> Frevert and Eric Gonzales.
>
> As you may know, we are right now in the process of merging with
> Iberdrola, the second Spanish electric company. If the merger is
> successful, we will be  "reinventing ourselves", as we will divest close
> to $15b of Spanish electric assets and reinvest the proceedings in new
> businesses and geographies.
>
> Last week, I discussed with Rafael Miranda, my boss and Endesa CEO, our
> interest to develop a formal contact with his counterpart at Enron, and I
> suggested him that I would contact you in that  respect. If the interest
> exists also on your part, please let me know.
>
> As a reference, I am attaching you the presentation we have been using
> with investors and analysts in our more recent roadshow.
>
> I hope to meet you in person soon. Warmest regards.
>
>  <<LEO_Equity_Story_C(10)_English.ppt>>
>
> Luis Rivera
> Director General de Planificaci?n y Medios
> ENDESA
> Tel.: +34915668615
> lrivera@endesa.es
> _________________________________________________________________________
> This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
> confidential, proprietary
> or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or privilege is
> waived or lost by any
> mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately
> delete it and all
> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify
> the sender.  You
> must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or
> copy any part of this
> message if you are not the intended recipient. ENDESA and each of its
> subsidiaries each
> reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its
> networks.  Any
> views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
> where the
> message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them.
> _______________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
 - LEO_Equity_Story_C(10)_English.ppt


Greg,

I'll be out of the office from the 5th of April.  I won't be back till the
16th.  Michelle Nelson (x58091) will run your daily book and John Swinney
(x39111) will be available to answer any questions you may have.

Thanks,
Shifali


Thanks for the note, except of course for the last comment, why don't you
just go seat in row 100 - alright.  Megan and I had a great time and enjoyed
having you guys come out..  I love going out there during the summer.  We are
going to arrange a ski weekend on President Day Weekend this February - so
make plans to be laughed at while skiing.  I didn't mean laughed at - I meant
having a fun time.  Talk to you soon.
Ben


Chris,

Please take a look at the attached language and forward it to Stacey for her
comments.

Thanks,

Kevin

Chris Walker
03/27/2001 12:07 PM
To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin Ruscitti/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Secondary firm delivery

Stacy,

Kevin Ruscitti has requested a secondary firm ANR ML7 phy gas product for
EOL.  I have located some language that you and Dale worked on back in May of
2000.  Please let me know if this language will be OK for our needs.  Also,
will the current GTC for Phy gas need to be revised in any way?

Thanks,

CW
3-7533

A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which Seller shall
sell and Buyer shall purchase a quantity of natural gas equal to the Daily
Contract Quantity at the Contract Price on a secondary firm basis. The
Contract Price shall be as submitted by Counterparty via the Website.  The
Period of Delivery shall be from the Effective Date through the Termination
Date.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for delivery at the ANR Pipeline Company ML7
interconnect.  The volumes scheduled to be delivered are subject to
reductions due to normal operational constraints on the ANR  Pipeline Company
pipelines based upon historical operating conditions.  The reductions caused
by these constraints are excused nonperformance and are not considered a
failure to receive or deliver firm gas.  In the event that the volumes
scheduled are reduced due to such normal operational constraints, Buyer may
designate a secondary firm delivery location.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of
British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per
day.


At least HE'S not sending gossippy emails to his boss!!

Gabriel Monroy
01/05/2001 03:49 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Aghhhh

I can't believe this guy. Before i went down stairs to talk to you, he was
making calls looking for a job. I come back, and he is doing the same thing.


Tracy,

Enron North America Corp. does not cover trades with Enron Canada.  For gas
delivery in Canada, you should consider an agreement with Enron Canada.

Also,  for long term firm transactions with ENA, you should have a Master
Agreement.  I hope this clears up any confusion.  If not, please give me a
call.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Thanks.   Mark


Hi Dale,

Did you just do a tolling agreement re: LV?  I'm looking for forms, and
thought I'd check.

Thanks,

Kay


That should be easy enough.   Paige needs some glasses, and that could run
$200-$300.
Dental is also covered, if we have any uncovered dental expenses.  I'm going
to guess we might have another $100 in prescriptions to fill this year as
well.  I could stand some new glasses also.

Your Eckerd's glasses can also be submitted.

We need to forecast for next year, as open enrollment starts soon.

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/16/2000 02:39:52 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: reimbursement

Election was $2400. Paid to date is $784 and I have an additional $712 to
submit. Hopefully they will pay even though the insurance declined to cover
it. So, that leaves a balance of $904 and we will owe Sharon $200 or so by
the end of this month. Depending on what happens after that we might have
another $250 or so from Sharon by the last of December. Best guess, $500 or
so we need to cover somewhere.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 1:49 PM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject: Re: reimbursement

Does that take into account that more money may be going into the spending
account?  I think we have a total of $2500 allocated for the year.  My
records indicate that I've put in $1900 as of my last paycheck.

Love,

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/16/2000 01:08:08 PM

Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>

To:   "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  reimbursement

I just received the EOBs back on Sharon Seals. They will not pay. If the
reimbusement account pays it will leave about $900.00 in the account. I
will
try to get the form completed tonight and in the mail tomorrow.
NM


---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000
04:10 PM ---------------------------

Tom Keavey <Thomas.Keavey@vistacomp.com> on 06/16/2000 04:44:04 PM
To: "'mark keavey'" <mkeavey@lutzandcarr.com>, "'niall.keavey'"
<niall.keavey@emea.gateway.com>, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'Cathleen
Keavey'" <c.keavey@mindspring.com>, "'John Keavey'" <jkeavey@epresence.com>,
"'Jane K'" <roaming_jane@hotmail.com>, "'Rafe'" <raef12@hotmail.com>,
"'Russell Gon'" <russell.gon@wiley.com>, "'Edwards'" <Cme@eamc.com>, "'Bill
Russell'" <ny344@aol.com>, "'Faughnan, M'" <Mary.Faughnan@HARPERCOLLINS.com>,
"'FOD'" <fodonnell@kingworld.com>, "'Mer Dixon'" <meredith_dixon@s5a.com>
cc:
Subject:

This is a true work of art:

www.welcome.to/mytrailerparkpage <http://www.welcome.to/mytrailerparkpage>


Hi Jim,

To keep you updated on the conference call I sat in with Lindy, Susan, Ramona and Mary Darveaux yesterday afternoon on the TW filing for scheduling Alternate Delivery Points by Price.  Here's a summary of the conversation (sorry, it's windy).

To make a tariff filing for scheduling Alternate Delivery Point by Price, TW will need to file a change to the GT&C definition of Alternate Receipt and Delivery Points.  TW tariff page 51A.  Also, Section 22.2 (tariff page 81B) for the scheduling of Alt. R/D Points will be modified.  Susan is making these changes and will route to Marketing.

TW does not want a process in place during the nomination cycles for "bidding up, right to match" if allocation occurs.  They just want a straight scheduled or not scheduled.  Also, TW wants every day, every cycle to have alternates scheduled by price.  However, if a discounted alternate by price gets in on the first cycle, then in cycle 2, another alternate comes in at a higher price than the alternate in cycle 1, the alternate in cycle 2 cannot bump the alternate in cycle 1 if there is not enough capacity to schedule them. The alternate scheduled in cycle 1 is already flowing and considered firm along with the primary firms and cannot be bumped by other alternates or even primary firms for the rest of this gas day.

Since TW has more that one max rate path rate, they would like to have the alternate with the highest absolute value up to max rate (they could be different paths with different max rates).  If there is more than one max rate alternate delivery wanting to be scheduled, they will be considered for scheduling on a pro-rata basis (even if their max rates are different).

TW also has flowing gas priorities for IT within the gas day.  Once IT is scheduled, it can only be bumped in the evening cycle (which is cycle 2, which starts tomorrow at 9:00am) and cycle 4 (also known as Intraday 1, gas flow effective 5:00pm, same day) by any alternate firms requesting to be scheduled.  If the IT is bumped during these two cycles, we actually bill them for 8 hours of flow and then the replacement shipper is billed for the remaining 16 hours of the day.  If an alternate firm requests to be scheduled during the other cycles, they may not bump existing alternates.  This is the way it works today and no changes are proposed to this with the new tariff filing.

Once any Alternate Firm is scheduled, if an allocation becomes necessary, all primary and alternates will be allocated together for this gas day pro-rata.  This is the way it works today and no changes are proposed to this with the new tariff filing.

TW is preparing the tariff changes now.  They are determining how long it will take to make system changes to effect these changes.  Based on that answer, they will make their filing 30-60 days before the time they can actually accommodate the new changes.  I think they are looking at an April or May implementation date.  They feel pretty comfortable that they will get approval for this, even if they get protests.

I will keep you posted if I hear or see anything else on this matter.

Thanks, Kim.


Judy,
My customer is getting serious about the Transco Zn 4 delivered deal.  Can
you call Transco and ask if we can get firm.  Would the rate on that be
floating with the max rate for that month, according to the rate case
settlement?
Thanks,
Sean


Here is a copy of the flow of funds for the Teco Project.  Please give Don
Black a call if you have any questions.  Thanks
Ben


Not exactly a "yes, we can close on Wednesday".

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 12/15/2000 06:00:44 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "'Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com'" <Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Coral closing Schedule - Part II

George called back to let me know that Coral/Tejas is now out and Intergen
is taking over.  George forwarded current drafts of the documents to John
Jones of Intergen.  George has told John that Enron is interested in closing
on Wednesday, and John was to  review the documents over the weekend.
George believes he has conveyed to John that the documents have been
negotiated on the buyer's behalf, but George is uncertain whether Intergen
will find it necessary to negotiate additional or other issues.  (It is
George's understanding that John Jones is in the legal department).  I tried
to contact John Jones directly (phone 713-374-3919), but as of late Friday,
he has not returned my call.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Please submit your time.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


2000 bagby #15403
houston 77002

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Wolkwitz, Rick" <rwolkwitz@POWERMERCHANTS.COM>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:

Hey, updating my Christmas card list.....what is your home address?


Elizabeth:

Rick asked me to contact you regarding PAC checks.  If we are still making contributions, I would like to request a check for my brother City Council member Carroll Robinson.  He is running in the Democratic primary for the 25th Congressional District to replace Ken Bensten, who is running for the US Senate.

Please advise.

Marchris


Prepayment and gas flow activity through Monday March 26th.

I have added 2 new members to the team, welcome Melissa and Sheeley.  Feel free to hit Jim Taylor up for a free lunch.


Attached is a clean and redline version of the revised agreement.  Dan has
not had a chance to review all the new language, but in the interest of time,
I am sending this out for review.


Jeff,
Sorry I've been hard to get a hold of... we held a workshop today to talk
about our proposed Transport Options program.  I found a copy of what I'd
sent to you before.  I'll stand behind these numbers today as representing
the dollar value of the risk Transwestern faced in the proceeding.  What's
not clear from my original note is that these cost impacts were annual, and
such impacts would continue year to year thereafter until
conditions/circumstances changed.  I hope this is useful.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 08/31/2000
05:25 PM ---------------------------

Jeffery Fawcett
03/06/2000 04:40 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: GIR proceeding-- Potential Financial Impact to TW

Jeff,
You asked me to try to quantify the impact of Transwestern losing access
rights to 200 MMcf/d of capacity at SoCal Needles as part of the GIR
proceeding.  Unfortunately, it's not a precise science inasmuch as it depends
on the shippers' reaction and/or retaliation to such circumstances.  As a
baseline, Transwestern is almost fully subscribed under various term length
contracts (and has been since 1998) to the California Border, including the
750 MMcf/d of capacity available at SoCal Needles.

In concept, under SFV rates, the majority of revenues would otherwise be
realized by TW, notwithstanding the circumstance of TW shippers being denied
full access to their primary delivery point.  In this "best case," the loss
to TW would be the commodity rates (theoretically, a wash, since they
presumably represent the true variable cost of TW providing the service), and
the revenue benefit associated with the fuel margin, calculated to be $5.8MM.

If TW shippers took the position that TW was responsible, and therefore,
accountable for their inability to consumate a portion of their transactions
into SoCal Gas' system, then TW faces a "more onerous case" in which it loses
the demand charge component of their contracts calculated to be $16.5MM.
Coupled with the aforementioned fuel margin, the total loss is $22.3MM.

In the worst case, in addition to the actual damages or costs to TW's
shippers described above, TW shippers may face performance penalties or other
contractual damages involving their commodity sales to customers behind SoCal
Gas.  Therfore, TW shippers may attempt to extract those same penalties and
costs from TW.

Realistically, I'd say that TW faces a loss somewhere between the best case
and the more onerous case, maybe in the $12 - $15MM range.

I hope this information is useful for purposes of your analysis.  Let me know
if I can be of any further assistance.


for my schedule
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/28/2001 10:23 AM ---------------------------
From:	Tracy Geaccone/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/28/2001 09:10 AM
To:	Robert Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/LON/ECT@Enron, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ENRON@enronXgate, James Prentice/ENRON@enronXgate, Rod Hayslett/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Hotte/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	James Weitekamp/ENRON@enronXgate, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Virginia O'Neill/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael P Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, John Keiser/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Caroline Barnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Thomas Meers/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Robert Guthrie/ENRON@enronXgate, James Saunders/ENRON@enronXgate, Kathy Campos/ENRON@enronXgate, Amelia Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janice Hogan/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Gilbert/ENRON@enronxgate, Greek Rice/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	June Quarter Forecast Meeting and Commercial Business Review

Please note the following changes:

Commercial Business Review originally scheduled for Friday, June 22 at 1:30-3:30 has been moved to Wednesday,
June 20 from 1:30-3:00 in 49C2.  This meeting is for commercial and commercial support people only.

Quarter Forecast Meeting originally scheduled for Wednesday, June 20 from 1:30-2:30 has been moved to 3:00 that same day in 49C2.

Thanks

Tracy


As promised but late.  Any comments please send them to myself and David.
Regards,
Jim


Attached is a revised prep memo for the referenced phone call.  The project
team decided to change the focus to a much greater concentration on timing
issues and a message that Enron may have to shift resources elsewhere if
Project Jose cannot move quickly.   Please review and return any comments at
your earliest convenience.  If you have any questions or wish to discuss,
please contact me at X-52709, emilio at X-52710, or guido at X-52707.

Mike:  We will advise you ASAP next week when all comments are in and the
memo is ready to be passed on to Lay.

Tom/John:  We think the call should take place some time during the week of
June 18.  Our thinking is that a good way to approach setting up the call may
be to go through Venezuelan Ambassador Arcaya.  Would you please assist in
setting up a meeting for the project team with the Ambassador in the near
future.

Neal


Have you ever sent a credit worksheet for EWEB?  Holli Krebbs requested this
again in mid-March.  Thanks.  Sara


I spoke with Bob Cummings yesterday in the airport.  Apparently, he has been working with DoE on a security project that he expects will be funded by them.  I believe this will be the digital certificate type of security the OSC has talked about in the past (the E-Marc proposal).  Instead of being used as originally intended to provide authentication functions for reservations and scheduling, it looks like it is being considered for securing informational items as well.  From what I understand, Pacific Northwest National Labs and Lockheed Martin have been in discussions with NERC about providing service under this DoE initiative.

He also stated that NERC plans to limit access to more data soon - perhaps as much as the entire NERC website, so that viewers must be registered with NERC, in order to do background checks and such before giving access.

One caveat - Bob sometimes likes to inflate his work to make himself appear more important (check me out, I'm talking to DoE and big contractors), so this may really be a few casual phone calls and general statements, rather than any sort of formal project.  But given the action we've seen lately, it may be a real project we should be investigating further.  I expect that once the board gives the go ahead, NERC plans to run this through as quickly as possible and rush for a quick implementation.

I would guess the likely approach is going to be, following an approving board decision, a relatively quick lockdown of their site, to be followed by a priority-one security infrastructure project like the one described in my first paragraph.  I would not be surprised if they also encourage other entities to lockdown their systems more tightly.

I don't know if there is any real action we can take right now, but obviously, this draws more attention to the issue as we move forward into next week.  Obviously, please be discreet in mentioning these details, as I don't want Bob to get skittish.  These issues may not be confidential, but then again, they might.

Please also note that I did not include Dick Ingersoll on this communiqu?.  I am not sure under what disclosure policies he is still bound (if any).

Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yeung, Charles
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 1:35 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Cromley, David
Cc:	Bestard, Jose; Ingersoll, Richard; Rodriquez, Andy
Subject:	Excerpt From MSNBC Article

WEB SITES REMOVE DOCUMENTS
U.S. government departments and agencies also have been stripping a wide range of documents from Web sites in recent days because of perceived threats to such critical systems as pipelines, water supply stations and power plants.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, for instance, took down its entire Web site Thursday to review its content for "information that might be useful to adversaries," said spokeswoman Rosetta Virgilio.
She said many other federal agencies also appeared to be in the process of removing such information from their sites.
The Transportation Department's Bureau of Transportation Statistics has cut off public access to databases used for mapping because of stepped-up concern about U.S. transportation infrastructure.
The Environmental Protection Agency has dismantled its risk-management Web site, which contains general information about emergency plans and chemicals used at 15,000 sites nationwide.


Did you mean to send that e:mail to me?  It was Greek to me, and I assume
that the Sally it was meant for was that Sally Conover.  Feels like a Monday,
doesn't it?  --Sally


don't want you to feel left out
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000 11:15
AM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 12/22/2000 10:57:51 AM
To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, peterthompson@akllp.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com,
lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com

Subject: CA Devel I & II Facilityl Agreements

Although InterGen has not completed its review of the Facility
Agreements, at Kay Mann's suggestion and to expedite matters, I am
passing on changes which InterGen requires with respect to Sections
17.3(a) and 17.4.1 of both Facility Agreements:

1.  Section 17.3(a) should be revised to read as follows:

"promptly refund the Maximum Liability Amount (less any unpaid portion
of the Purchase Amount) and pay Cover Damages plus Termination Costs
described in Sections 17.4.2(i) and 17.4.2(iv) described below; or"

2.  The third and fourth sentences of Section 17.4.1 should be revised
to read as follows:

"If the Maximum Liability Amount (less any unpaid portion of the
Purchase Amount) is greater than the Proper Scope Value, the difference
between such amount and the Proper Scope Value (the "Refund Amount")
shall be settled between the parties in accordance with Section 17.4.4
below.  If the Maximum Liability Amount (less any unpaid portion of the
Purchase Amount) is less than the Proper Scope Value, the difference
between such amount and the Proper Scope Value (the "Scope Value Due")
shall be settled between the parties in accordance with Section 17.4.4
below."

It is InterGen's understanding that the Purchase Amount is currently
$1,829,000, subject to adjustment by future change orders, and that the
amounts previously paid plus the Purchase Amount are equal to the
Maximum Liability Amount of $14,352,000, subject to adjustment by future
change orders.  It is essential to InterGen that CA Development I and CA
Development II receive credit for the amounts previously paid and that
they not be required to go outside of the Facility Agreement to
determine such amounts.

George Kutzschbach
713-651-3702