Stinson,

No problem. I shall forward the letter to HR
to enter this information into the company's records.

I hope you will have good time and come back with fresh dose
of energy.

Vince

Stinson Gibner
08/23/2000 09:08 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Request for Leave

Vince,

After eight years of working for Enron, I would like to take some additional
time off.   If possible, I would like to take three weeks of leave without
pay, beginning September 25 and continuing through October 13th, 2000.

Thank you,

Stinson Gibner


The Power Trading Legal Group is perfectly happy with everyone on this list.

:)

Shari


Paul,

Mark T. asked me to have a look at the GTC's you prepared for Credit
Derivatives in the USA. I think you did a great job on the GTC's and have
just a few  suggestions/comments/questions:

1. Would it not be easier for the Counterparty to understand the document if
the Definitions were in Section 1? Failing that, it would be helpful to
indicate upfront that there is a glossary of Defined Terms at the end of the
document.

2. I agree with Mark that we would expect for a signed Confirmation to
control over the GTC's (and/or ETA). Section 1 is inconsistent with this idea.

3. Section 2(d)(iii): I wonder why we are making the Trade Option rep. here.
I would not have thought that a Credit Option could be considered a
"commodity derivative". Put another way - does Sullivan and Cromwell really
think that the CFTC has jurisdiction over credit products? I would have
thought credit products are more similar to an OTC equity derivative. I
wonder if they have considered any potential SEC issues.

4. Section 2 - under the BOLDED WARNINGS, (C) regarding "... Enron ceasing to
provide quotations".  This seems inconsistent with  the opening paragraph
which says that  this website should not be construed as an offer by Enron to
buy or sell. If that is the case, why is Enron providing quotations? Seems to
me that if one is offering a quotation, one is offering the price at which
one will buy or sell.

Also, I would recommend to clarify the last sentence in (C)  by adding at the
end of "credit products", both times it appears, the words "with Enron".
There is nothing to stop the Counterparty from entering into new credit
products with third parties but the current wording could be taken to imply
this.

5. Section 4 "Events of Default": In the 8th Line, after the word "Party", I
would insert "to comply with".

6. Remedies: Was it a conscious decision to give the Defaulting Party Five
Business Days to pay the amount it owes but give Non-Defaulting party Ten
Business Days?

7. Termination: In clause (c), it should refer to the Scheduled Termination
Date.

8. Section 11 (C): I would suggest to insert at the end thereof to add
something along the lines of, "as soon as such party becomes aware of any
inaccuracy or misrepresentation."

9. Section 11 (D): Please check with ENA Tax - I believe we are using new tax
forms which have replaced the W-8 and 1001.

10. Section 13  "General Definitions":

"Buyer Payment Date" I would recommend that the Buyer Payment Dates be
specified in the actual trade confirmation. This is something I can foresee
the traders changing for every transaction.

"Effective Date" : Do you mean 60 Business or Calendar Days?

"Interest Rate": In a USD Denominated Agreement where ENA is a CP - I would
have thought we would use an interest rate quoted by a US bank - rather than
Barclays.

Schedule

Governing Law & Jurisdiction: Just to echo what Mark Taylor pointed out -
normally we are required to use Arbitration rather than Ct. jurisdiction in
ENA Master Agreements. Haedicke feels very strongly about this. I can send
the language if you need it.

Exclusion of Third Party Rights: There is a stray quotation mark at the end
of this paragraph.

I hope this is helpful - please feel free to call.

Shari
__________________________________________________

	From:  Mark Taylor                           02/08/2000 06:07 PM

To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline - Credit Derivatives Documentation

I haven't had a chance to look at this yet but here it is.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2000 06:06
PM ---------------------------

Paul Simons
01/27/2000 12:31 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Omer Muftuler/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnronOnline - Documentation

Mark

As per my voice-mail, here is a raft of GTCs including the US version.  The
US version take on board S &C's comments, but obviously you will need to sign
off on the US GTCs before we go live.  Grateful for any final comments asap
as we are aiming to finalise them on Monday.

Many thanks and sorry its not much of a birthday gift (I'll make it up to
you)!

Regards

Paul
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 27/01/2000 18:25
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Brown, Gavin" <Gavin.Brown@SlaughterandMay.com>
    25/01/2000 23:23

To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: "WARNA-KULA-SURIYA, Sanjev" <Sanjevwks@SlaughterandMay.com>, "RANDELL,
Charles" <Charles.RANDELL@SlaughterandMay.com>, "Petch, Tolek"
<Tolek.Petch@SlaughterandMay.com>

Subject: EnronOnline - Documentation

SLAUGHTER AND MAY
35 Basinghall Street, London EC2V 5DB
TEL: +44 (0) 171 600 1200     FAX: +44 (0) 171 600 0289

This e-mail message is CONFIDENTIAL and may contain legally privileged
information.  If you are not the intended recipient you should not read,
copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information in this e-mail.
Please also telephone or fax us immediately and delete the message from your
system. E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and
unauthorised amendment, and we do not accept liability for any such
corruption, interception or amendment or the consequences thereof.

A list of the partners and their professional qualifications is available
for inspection at the above address.  The partners are either solicitors or
registered foreign lawyers.

____________________________________________________________________________
__________
Dear Paul,
I attach the Swedish, Swiss, US and UK GTCs.
Kind regards,
Gavin Brown

 - CA003672719_7.doc
 - CA003672720_7.doc
 - CA003672721_7.doc
 - CA003672492_14.doc


The pre-enrollment process for the Enron Kids' Center is underway and ends
Friday, March 30, 2001.  Enrollment packages can be picked-up at the HR Kiosk
between 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM or call Cynthia Vasquez at  X3.1726.

Our childcare center will be located on Louisiana Street across from our
corporate headquarters.  The anticipated opening date is fall 2001.  Any
eligible full-time or part-time Enron employee who will have a child/children
between the ages of six weeks and four years by the opening date of the
center will be eligible to utilize the center.

Please go to http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/ekidctr.pdf to learn more
about Enron,s onsite child care center.  If you still have questions or
concerns, please contact Knowledge Beginnings at 1-877-244-5346 (between 8:00
am - 5:00 p.m. PST) or visit their web site at www.knowledgebeginnings.com .
Enron is excited about the plans for the Enron Kids, Center and we look
forward to the grand opening!


Becky,

I am sending you two spreadsheets. Headcount gives  the allocations by major
business units. Please, see the sheet Allocations. Line 83 gives you the
percentages
you can use.

Budget  spreadsheet gives the budget projections. The sheet Allocations has
been modified to
include charges to RAC and GRM. I had to modify extensively  the sheet Detail
to account for the size of the group (as compared with 25 rows available to
list the
employees in the original spreadsheet). Please, check the logic of my
modifications
(I hope I copied all the formulas correctly). I had to assume a bonus number.

I shall work on allocations by different business units within ENA
and GRM  but it's chasing a moving target. It changes from month to month.

I shall be gone for the next 4 business days. Please, call me and leave a
message
on my voice mail if there is any question. I shall be listening to my voice
messages.

Sorry if there are any problems. I have to rush to catch my plane.

Vince

P.S. Thanks for all the help. I owe you lunch.


Thanks very much.


<http://216.33.111.213/images/august/headermap.gif>

Dear reader,
Light up email inboxes around the world with our online greetings!

  <http://216.33.111.213/images/october/octtophead.gif>
 <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.D.ESG872>
A surprisingly
funny "hi!"
	 <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.E.CsekUU>
Having a
BAD hair day?
	 <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.F.Etq6c>
Good advice with
a little spice

        It's been said that laughter is the shortest distance between two
        people. Span the miles with a funny Just Because <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.C.CHxqCN> greeting.

  <http://216.33.111.213/images/september/adheader.gif>
 <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.Q.C3r8CN>

  <http://216.33.111.213/images/october/octwphead.gif>
 <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.I.CjG4zR>
Boss's Day
October 16
 <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.J.PmaAV>
Thank you
co-workers
 <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.K.CP6QSt>
New Yorker
cartoons

        If you've got to work all day, you might as well have some fun.
        Share workplace humor <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.H.EKlne3> greetings with your co-workers, associates,
        and (hey, why not?) even your boss.

        Thanks for being part of the AmericanGreetings.com <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.R.8frSx> community.

        P.S. October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month.
        Send a gentle reminder, <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.B.DgB8H> to someone you love.
  <http://216.33.111.213/images/august/bottomcurv.gif>

 <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/Key=2191.CiIB.G.CGxc2A>

If you choose not to receive these messages from AmericanGreetings.com, or if you would like to
change your e-mail address or message format preference, simply click here:
http://cme1.americangreetings.com/opt- out/survey.html/Key=2191.CiIB.4v5sp <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/opt-out/survey.html/Key=2191.CiIB.BZQfZi>
or e-mail us with a subject of "unsubscribe" and we'll take you off the list as quickly as possible.
Please include this entire message in your reply.

Message-Id: <20011012181002.E61F.646289-2191@cme1.americangreetings.com>
  <http://cme1.americangreetings.com/images/blankpixel.gif/Key=2191.CiIB.Caafna>


This was sent to me by one of the developers.  I believe it relates to an
expansion (or new interconnection) of the Caledonia facility.  I don't know
which lawyer has been working on it, so I'm sending it around to see if
anyone claims it. Chris thought that someone from Power Trading may have been
working on it.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 02:16
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           10/10/2000 12:48 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

Kay,

This is the format for the land options that Robert Shaw of New Century is
using in Caledonia, MS.  Please advise if these documents are appropriate.

Thanks,

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 10/10/2000 12:42
PM ---------------------------

Mona Harvey <harveym@ncess.com> on 10/10/2000 11:20:08 AM
Please respond to "harveym@ncess.com" <harveym@ncess.com>
To: "Chris Booth (E-mail)" <Chris.Booth@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

Chris,
 Robert Shaw asked me to send these documents to you.

Please call either of us at 713-757-9771 if you need additional information.

Sincerely,
Mona Harvey

 - Easement - Caledonia Project (3-9-00).doc
 - Option to Purchase ROW-Caledonia Project (3-9-00).doc


by popular vote, the draft will take place at noon on 8/20 at BW-3 in rice
village.


29 Inverness Park Way, 77055

From: Carlos Sole on 04/12/2001 04:40 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com, jkeffer@kslaw.com, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Home Addresses

Please email your home addresses.  Thank you.

Carlos Sole'
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002-7361

(713) 345-8191 (phone)
713 646-3393 (fax)


BUY
SALE

PRM  incorrectly reported PGE as the sink.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Mike


C:\Documents and Settings\ddavis\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKF22\Bible King James Version.htm


Jill,

I was wondering if I could get some information on the Costilla deal,
specifically the repurchase option.  I need to know the term, locations,
volume and strike price of the call.

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


Derek:  I just wanted to let you know that I will be available to help you on
swap matters now that Shari has transitioned to another group.  You can
always reach me at Ext. 35620.  Please let me hear from you.  Sara


Alert Posted: 2:45  PM November 18, 2000  RE- (REVISED) Demand Mismatch Order
Notice
Effective Monday, November 20, 2000 at 10:00 a.m., and until further notice,
AGLC is issuing a demand mismatch order for the following primary pools. This
notice is revised to include the Ex- Atlanta Southern Group and The Ex-
Atlanta Transco Group. We apologize for the confusion the previous alerts may
have caused.
ATLANTA, EX-ATLANTA SNG,  MACON, AUGUSTA , Rome and EX-ATLANTA TRANSCO.
Based on the current supply levels and expected demand levels, AGLC's system
cannot manage the potential excess demand and the operational integrity of
the system will be threatened. Therefore, it is essential that your
interruptible customer's demand does not exceed the scheduled supply for your
interruptible market for each primary pool under the demand mismatch order.
Each shipper/pooler/marketer is responsible for contacting their
interruptible customers to curtail demand if necessary to meet this order.
Marketers/Poolers are responsible for maintaining interruptible customer
contact information. Any customer contact information in GOS is for AGLC
internal use and is not intended to be marketers/poolers point of contact for
curtailments.


Very artful--I think this resolves MKM's concern but I'll defer to her on
that.  This approach does also give us more commercial flexibility which I
think the marketers should like.  df

From: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/23/2001 10:04 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Reply comments

Mary Kay, here is my proposed "fix" for paragraph 1 b.  ...running it by you
just to make sure I understood your message correctly.  Let me know if this
is OK.

Calpine has also requested that the tariff be amended to clarify that
capacity remains generally available during the notice period but not during
the option bidding process.  However, it was not Transwestern,s intent to so
limit the availability of recourse service.  Recourse shippers may request
and obtain posted capacity at any time, including during the option bidding
process, unless and until an option is sold on that capacity.  If this is not
clear in Transwestern,s proposed tariff provisions, Transwestern will modify
the tariff sheets accordingly.


Please sign me up.


FYI
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 09:44 AM -----

	"Johns, Elizabeth" <Elizabeth.Johns@dowjones.com>
	01/30/2001 09:09 AM

		 To: "'mark.taylor@enron.com'" <mark.taylor@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dow Jones Bandwidth Intelligence Alert

As growth in bandwidth trading continues to explode,
Dow Jones is introducing a weekly newsletter, Dow Jones
Bandwidth Intelligence Alert, to keep you on top of the
companies, trading activity and issues shaping the
nascent broadband market.

You're invited to receive a free copy of
Dow Jones Bandwidth Intelligence Alert, with no
obligation.  All you have to do is choose fax or e-mail.

Dow Jones Bandwidth Intelligence Alert is designed to
keep traders, consultants, legal advisers, information
gatherers, and investors apprised of developments in the
bandwidth market. Every Monday the newsletter delivers:

* Bandwidth Beat - a weekly column by Michael Rieke,
  Dow Jones Newswires' Houston Bureau Chief, who has
  covered the broadband market since its inception
* Bandwidth Market - a close look at recent trades
* Bandwidth Capacity Spot Forward Prices - for the New
  York to Los Angeles and New York to Washington
  routes, a Dow Jones exclusive
* Coverage of companies, major players and trends in
  the developing bandwidth market

Dow Jones has been covering the bandwidth industry longer
than any other news organization and we look forward to
keeping you informed of developments in this exciting
new market.

       For a free sample, with no obligation, contact:
       Carlos Mesa
       carlos.mesa@dowjones.com


Kathy,

Thanks for your message. We are  very interested in talking to Keith.
Please, give him my phone number/E-mail address
and he can contact me directly.

Vince

"Kathy Ensor" <kathy@stat.rice.edu> on 04/18/2000 11:32:27 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Possible hire?

Dear Vince,

A faculty member in our department, namely Dr. Keith Baggerly,
 is interested in pursuing other employment. He is currently an
assistant professor in our program and a highly valued member  of
our department. We hate to lose him, however his interest has shifted
from the academic arena to one of high level but practical application
and development of statistical methodologies including
stochastic modeling.

Keith is actually a graduate of our Ph.D. program; he was in the same
group of students as Martin Lawera. Keith spent several years at Los
Alamos National Lab before we recruited him back to Rice. He has
been on our faculty now for three years and it is my expectation
(and that of my colleagues) that if he remained he would receive
tenure.

Keith has a strong interest in financial models and the background
to support his interest. He is also a leading expert in statistical
computing, empirical likelihood, categorical models and areas
of statistics falling under the general bailiwick of "data mining".
He is a creative thinker.

I do not know if there are possibilities for Keith within your group,
however
I believe it is an excellent match of talent and objectives.  Would you
have an interest in speaking with Keith? If so, I will suggest that he
contact you.

Best regards,

Kathy Ensor

Katherine Bennett Ensor                             E-mail: ensor@rice.edu
Professor and Chair                                      OR:
kathy@stat.rice.edu
Department of Statistics, MS 138               Phone #: (713) 348 4687
Rice University                                              Dept. #: (713)
348 6032
Houston, TX 77251-1892                              Fax #: (713) 348 5476


Start Date: 3/1/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030109.txt


To all -

If you have not already viewed the TradeSpark website, please do so at your
earliest convenience.  I am trying to move forward with negotiations on the
access agreement and need to be assured that I have all Enron comments prior
to doing so.  My goal for finalizing the document is Friday of this week.

Thanks for your support and assistance.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 09:10 AM -----

	Tana Jones@ECT
	03/01/2001 03:33 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Tradespark PC

We now have a computer set up so you can view the TradeSpark website.  It is
located in a cubicle across from the C-1 conference room (on the side
opposite of me, at EB3858D).  Since it has taken us so long to get access
into this website, it is critical that each of you review your products
descriptions of the website AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.  Can you each please confirm
to me that you have completed your review and if you have any issues with the
product descriptions please pass them on to Sheri Thomas with EnronOnline.

If for any reason you continue to have computer problems, please call Jason,
our floor computer tech, ASAP.

Thanks for your prompt attention to this!

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001 03:19 PM -----

	Jason Sherman@ENRON
	03/01/2001 03:14 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tradespark PC

Tana,

The Tradespark PC has been installed in EB3858D. I created a local account
for all the lawyers to use to login, the userid is tradespark and the
password is tradespark. Once they login, they will doubleclick on the
tradespark icon on the desktop and will be at the tradespark login window.
The userid should already be in place, but if not, it is netnrg3 and the
password is espeed. That should get them into the tradespark system. Now,
once Tradespark has come out with a version that is W2k compatible, we will
install the application on each of their PC's for their convenience. Let me
know if you need any further information. As always, I am here to help.

                                   Thanks,
       Jason

Jason Sherman
Enron Corp Desktop Support
Office: (713) 345-7764
Email: Jason.Sherman@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000
07:12 AM ---------------------------

"Brook" <brook@pdq.net> on 08/23/2000 01:18:02 AM
To: "Eric Johnson" <ezy@flash.net>, "Heather Evans" <reagantgo@aol.com>,
"Greg Smith" <gregtapper@aol.com>
cc: "Matthew Lenhart" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>, "Bryan Hull"
<Bryan.Hull@enron.com>

Subject: Losers Wanted

Wow, what a response we have had so far...23  players are in (old news, more
than that now).? WE NEED MORE  HOWEVER!!!!? Don't forget to spread the word
if anyone you know would be  interested.? I surely expect atleast 10 more to
join but would love alot  more.? Anyway, now to the important stuff...getting
on the  site.
?
Unlike in years past, I feel that people are more  internet literate and can
get signed up in a league without step by step  instructions.? So I am going
to give you the basics and you can figure it  out from there.? I advise you
do it sooner than later incase you have any  problems.
?
The site is www.commissioner.com.? On the home  page, you will see the?a
place to sign into commissioner.? You must  have an account with
commission.com to join the league.? It is the same  site we used last year
and your name and password should still be active.?  If you don't remember
it, you can create a new one or there is probably  somewhere that you can get
them to email you your?username and  password.? Anyway, once you set up an
account scroll down and select Office  Pool Manager. Our league name is
Losers Wanted.? We also have a short name  of Loser (they might ask for that
also, **notice no 's').? The password is  3333.
?
You should be taken to a page to pick who you  are.? Your name should not be
in the list.? Select "new player" and  enter your name.? This should take you
to the site.
?
Once you are in....BOOKMARK IT.? It will make  it alot easier to get to it in
the future.? Take a look at the site.?  The three main links you will be
using are...1)Make Picks...2)My  Picks...3)Standings.? Each week (I think
Tuesday) commissioner.com will  enter the lines on the Make Picks page.?
These lines will stay constant  untill they close the entries for the week (1
hour before first kick?off,  includes Thursday games).? You can make your
picks and change your picks on  this page.? To view your picks you can go to
My Picks.? On Monday you  can check the Standings.? You can view it by a
certain week or the yearly  totals.? Just click on the top on what column you
will want to sort  by.? That is basically it.?There are other links if you
want to check  them out...it is a great site.
?
As for the rules...the money will all be determined  as I get an exact number
of players...ALL MONEY WILL BE PAID OUT!!!!! There will  be weekly winners
and yearly winners (and LOSER).? The picks you make each  week will be each
game that week, including Monday nights game.? In  addition to Monday's game,
you will pick the Monday night total points  scored.? This tie breaker will
determine weekly winners in case of any  ties.? The person closest to the
total will win the tie breaker (absolute  value).? If the absolute value is
equal, the under will beat the  over.? Example...total points is 30.? Player
A picks 35...B picks  20...A wins.? Player A pick 35...B picks 25...B wins.?
Don't worry, it  is real easy.?
?
As for the tie breaker for the season totals.?  Anyone that is tied at the
top will use the playoffs in the NFL as our  playoffs.? I will send out the
lines (the site won't have them) to the  players involved.? You will pick all
four games and the person who gets the  most correct will win.? If multiple
people tie then we will weed out and go  on to the next weeks.? If it makes
it all the way to the superbowl, then we  will pick the game and an
over/under as the ultimate tiebreaker.
?
Don't worry if you don't make your picks one  week.? You won't take a zero?(
I am a softie).? Too many people  have those weeks that they can't get around
to making there picks.? If I  gave zeros, that would kill your chances for
the yearly total.? Anyone that  doesn't get their picks in will take all the
AWAY teams.? I will enter  those picks after the deadline to enter picks.?
All these games will count  to the yearly total but can not win the weekly
prize.?
?
That is it for now...Oh ya, one more thing.?  You can send me a check ($50)
to the following.?
?
Michael Brookner
3001 Hillcroft #508
Houston, TX 77057
?
?
PLEASE DON'T FORWARD THIS TO NEW  PLAYERS.??I WANT TO KNOW EVERYONE THAT IS
IN.? IF YOU KNOW  SOMEONE THAT IS INTERESTED, HAVE THEM EMAIL ME AT
BROOK@PDQ.NET.? I WILL SEND ALL THIS INFO  TO THEM WHEN I GET THERE INTEREST.
?
?
THANKS....Brook


As we begin to meet with FERC Staff on the Wholesale market issues related to
CA problems, I think that we need to put together a list of questions that
FERC needs to be asking Western power market participants.

The following are some questions that I think are important to have FERC ask;
I'm sure there are more.

1. Were California utilities underscheduling load into the PX day ahead
market?
2. How many MWs did the CA ISO procure during each hour during the Summer
2000?  How does this compare with CA ISO procurement during 1999?
3. Has PG&E changed its bidding behavior associated with its Hydro facilities
in 2000?
3. Are there baseload facilities that were operated differently in 2000 than
in 1999?
4. Were any generation plants off-line due to unplanned maintenance during
Summer 2000?
5. How did the CA ISO demand side program work?  Why didn't more load
participate?
6. What options did SDG&E have to "hedge" its retail rates?  What were prices
in the CAL PX block forward market on Jan 15, 2000 and May 15, 2000?
7. How high did natural gas prices go in California for generation during
Summer 2000?
8. Were other Western power markets prices higher (year-on-year)?
9. Did the CA ISO Board face political pressure to reduce bid caps?  Is this
appropriate for a FERC jurisdictional entity?
10. What specific details is SDG&E referring to in its Complaint on
"unworkably competitive" CA ISO markets?  Can these be fixed "quickly"?

Please add other questions.

Jim


Remi,

No problem. My assistant Shirley Crenshaw will call you Friday to set up a
meeting.

Vince

Remi Collonges@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/24/2000 09:10 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT, Grant Masson@ECT
cc:
Subject: curves for South America

Vince and Grant,

I have been made responsible for all gas and power curves in South America
(plus books development, reporting, .......).  I have somewhat started but,
since I am new on the job, I'd love to receive advice, guidance (and at some
stage help) from you.  Would you be available for a meeting next week,
preferably Thursday or Friday?   I'm planning to be in Houston these days.

Remi Collonges
(55) 11 5503 1200


Following are EPMI weighted average trade prices for Tues., March 27. After
discussing this e-mail with my manager, we've decided to only send the
information previously sent via fax. If you have any questions on individual
deals, please don't hesitate to call.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


Shirley and Molly,

Vince is interested to set up an interview for Renshi Zhang.  Any day except
Thursday next week
is good.

Interviewers: Vince, Stinson, Vasant, Tanya, Alex, Bob,Krishna and myself.

Contact number for Mr. Zhang is 713-544-5989.

Zimin

---------------------- Forwarded by Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 03:52 PM
---------------------------

Zimin Lu
04/05/2001 09:49 AM

---------------------- Forwarded by Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001 09:46 AM
---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
03/14/2001 10:06 AM
To: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Resume

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
10:07 AM ---------------------------

Marshall Brown <Marshall.Brown@robertwalters.com> on 03/09/2001 07:46:22 AM
To: Vince Kaminski <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Resume

Vince,
     How are you.   This candidate would be interested in any positions in
your group.
Regards,

Marshall Brown
Vice President
Robert Walters Associates
Tel: (212) 704-0596
Fax:(212) 704 - 4312
mailto:marshall.brown@robertwalters.com
http://www.robertwalters.com

 <<ZHAN_REN.DOC>>

**********************************************************************
CAUTION: Electronic mail sent through the Internet is not secure and could
be intercepted by a third party.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

**********************************************************************

 - ZHAN_REN.DOC


Let me know if you have to change any of these.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001
10:20 AM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               02/08/2001 09:39 AM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--2/8/01


Although a final order is not yet available, we were able to glean the basic content of the Commission's latest refund order from the discussion had at the Commission meeting this morning.   It appears that the Commission has not strayed far from Judge Wagner's recommendations, which came out of the settlement conference ordered by FERC.  Highlights include:

In California, refunds/offsets apply only to spot transactions in CAISO and CalPX, and only as of October 2.

Both public and non-public utilities are subject to refund.

It appears that the refund methodology will be similar to that of the June 19 Order, as refined by Judge Wagner.

Daily spot gas prices will be utilized in the methodology.

A 10% creditworthiness premium will be added.

An evidentiary hearing will be ordered to collect the data needed for the methodology;  it is our understanding that the CAISO will have 15 days to provide certain information and the Judge must certify the record in 45 days.

A separate preliminary evidentiary hearing will be ordered to consider Pacific Northwest refunds.  It was briefly described as consisting of an information gathering proceeding of 15 days, followed by an evidentiary proceeding of 30 days.  The Judge would then have an additional 7 days to report to the Commission.  An issue will be the definition of "spot" transaction for the Pac NW, since counsel to the Commission noted that it could differ from the spot definition for California.

We are awaiting the final order and will update this report as soon as it issues.

RA


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/14/2000 09:19
AM ---------------------------

"Timothy Oxley" <TOxley@winston.com> on 12/14/2000 09:18:28 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: <robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: Re: GE Release

I have never seen the language requested before and have not signed off on
it.  Rob Taylor and I only discussed the concept because I had never seen a
draft of the Consent until a signed copy was delivered to me yesterday.

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 12/14/00 08:47AM >>>

This language is different that what GE was told was requested before.  I
am more comfortable going back to GE with what was requested previously.

Kay

"Timothy Oxley" <TOxley@winston.com> on 12/13/2000 08:38:52 PM

To:   <Kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   <robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject:  GE Release

Pursuant to the request of Rose Engeldorf, the following is the
suggested language for insertion into the GE Consent:

"Each of GE Packaged Power and GE acknowledge that WestLB is a third
party beneficiary of this Consent and shall be entitled to enforce its
provisions against GE Packaged Power and GE, respectively, as if a
party to this Consent."


Rex, the format you sent the document in will not open for me.  Can you send
it as a .ppt document?  Thanks, SRS

Rex_Shelby@enron.net on 02/11/2000 12:43:15 PM
To: jeff.skilling@enron.com, Joe_Hirko@enron.net, krice@enron.com,
khanno@enron.com
cc: David_Berberian@enron.net, Mark_S_Palmer@enron.net

Subject: Technology Steering Committee

Hello --

Per Jeff's idea of an EBS Technology Steering Committee, attached are slides
that Mark Palmer put together to describe the proposed mission and membership
of
such a group.  Let me know you thoughts.  Regards.

-- Rex

---------------------- Forwarded by Rex Shelby/Enron Communications on
02/11/2000 10:42 AM ---------------------------

From: Mark S Palmer on 02/11/2000 10:29 AM

To:   Rex Shelby

cc:   David Berberian

Subject:  TSC, latest version

Latest version

(Embedded image moved to file: pic18132.pcx)

 - pic18132.pcx


FYI.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schneider, Chip
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:03 AM
To:	Gorte, David; Rohauer, Tanya
Cc:	Hagelmann, Bjorn
Subject:	Notes from 9/17/01 RAC Meeting on Steel

Please add notes as appropriate.  These are for RAC purposes only and will not be distributed.

Challenge

Appetite for credit capacity is much greater than what is justifiable given credit quality of industry and liquidity of transactions.

Issues

Dearth of liquidity in market (bearing in mind that EIM's purpose is to stimulate liquidity)
Poor credit quality
Highly structured nature of steel transactions (inventory management, illiquid options, etc.)
M-T-M Accounting and incentives related to achieving earnings targets

Short-term Solutions

Consider expanding "risk pool" (with concentration limits) to provide more flexibility to commercial teams (Pitfall:  could be rapidly depleted to achieve short-term budget targets)
Reduce size of transactions and increase volume to achieve greater diversity and less concentration

Action Items

Plan more formal education for Steel Group centered around
M-T-M Accounting
Credit Analysis
Market Risk Analysis
Determination of Credit Lines
Calculating Credit Reserves
Link Budget Process to Credit and Market Risk
More clearly define view of liquidity with regard to different types of transactions/commodities


Here's the latest revision inserting the drawing numbers.  Is it ready to go
to GE?

Scott, payment for change orders is addressed in the contract.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000 01:22
PM ---------------------------

Reggie Wilson
04/18/2000 12:57 PM
To: Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Replacement of stolen chairs

Kevin,
If you guys had Aerons(mesh) and/or Vecta (Leather) chairs, my group
typically will not be  responsible for the replacement of those chairs as I'm
not aware of who has taken the chairs or where they may have gone. My group
does not stock these chairs, therefore we order as requested by business
units and charge your Co/RC. There will be two chairs delivered to the
locations mentioned below, however, they will not be the Vecta or Aeron
chairs.

You may want to contact Enron Security and maybe they can investigate further.

Thanks,
Reggie

Kevin G Moore
04/18/2000 10:54 AM
To: Reggie Wilson/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Replacement of stolen chairs

Hi Reggie,
We spoke regarding the chairs on Monday.
Please,  we need these chairs as soon as possible ,without being charged.
We paid for all new chairs each time we moved and it's not fair we pay again.

   Thanks

 Kevin Moore

P.S. These chairs were taken .........
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000 10:46
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           04/18/2000 10:00 AM

To: Reggie Wilson/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Replacement of stolen chairs

Reggie,

There may already be a request floating around for a standard black office
chair for EB1972d.  It was stolen over a weekend several weeks ago.  In
addition to that one, my own chair at EB3132A was stolen this past weekend.
Could you come up with a couple of decent ones for us?

If you need to charge them to us, our numbers are 0011 and 100038.  As
always, call me if you need to at x58322.

Thanks!

Sam Smith


Attached is a summary of the last two meetings of the External Accountability
Subcommittee meetings.  Included is the draft work plan - please review the
work plan and convey any comments to Jean and copy me.  Also, you have
committed to giving me your stakeholder lists by tomorrow, Friday 3/30 for
the Stakeholder Perception survey.  If you have any questions or difficulties
with this, please call me.

Also, we have added a new section on the EHS/Corporate Responsibility
intranet site with "news and information" on corporate responsibility-related
topics. The home page is: http://ehs.corp.enron.com and once you pass the
animation, etc. you can click on "Corporate Responsibility" for specific
information and materials.  Suggestions for content is always welcome!

Thank you for your participation and efforts,
Catherine

Catherine McKalip-Thompson
Manager, Environmental Responsibility
Enron Corp.
101 California Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: 415.782.7842
Fax: 415.782.7854


Barbara,

	I've included the 1st draft that Gerald emailed to me before leaving on vacation.
	The text that I've inserted is in blue.  There is some text that I've excluded relative
	to the "Start Date" because of issues that surround the commodities (gas and power)
	by not having a Firm Start Date.

	 The concern will be what happens if the installation by ECS (or our appointee's like Hanover
	and Rusk County Electric Cooperative) is delayed (i.e. construction risk).  My suggestion is
	to have the customer operate under the Test Period provision for the first 2 or 3 months of the
	deal and push the Start Date back.  Ultimately we are still picking a date that everyone is
	comfortable that we can accommodate before taking financial positions with the commodities.

	 I'm open for suggestions.

	mk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Saturday, June 02, 2001 5:08 PM
To:	Knippa, Mark
Cc:	Hilgert, Chris; Gray, Barbara
Subject:	Discussion Drafts for Oakhill and Bay Gas

Mark,  Attached are rough drafts of the following documents for the noted projects:

Bay Gas Storage
1.  Draft CSA
2.  Draft Lease Agreement
3.  Draft O&M Agreement

Oakhill
1.  Draft CSA
2.  Draft O&M Agreement for Hanover to provide maintenance.

Please note that these are really rough based on the limited information available at this time.  I did not provide a lease agreement for Oakhill as you indicated Hanover would finance/lease the Electric Motor Drivers to ECS.  If Hanover is providing a straight lease, the lease for Bay Gas could be used.  If Hanover is providing a purchase option, the lease agreement would need to be modified for the purchase option.  My suggestion is to provide these forms to the customer with the caveat that as the commercial terms are fine tuned, these drafts will be modified.  But this gives them the basic idea.   In my absence please contact Barbara for coordination of legal support in the event you cannot wait until I return.  Thanks.


Did I send this to you already ?
---------------------- Forwarded by Barry Tycholiz/CAL/ECT on 11/27/2000
10:32 AM ---------------------------

Barry Tycholiz
11/23/2000 03:51 PM
To: Bradb@calpine.com
cc:
Subject: Enron - PGT Payout Table

Brad, further to our conversation of yesterday morning, please find attached
Enron's payout table and alternative payout table regarding the permanent
assignment of PGT capacity.

The onus will be on Enron to deliver long dated capacity to Calpine and we
will begin working on this immediately.

Below is a summary of some of the key next steps. Please review and we can
discuss on Monday the numbers and final steps as required.

ENA and Calpine will formalise  % discount, volume grid, lump sum $ amount or
annuity amount.
As discussed our cost of funds implied will be LIBOR + 200 basis points. ( to
be confirmed ).
ENA will raise a precedent agreement with option language in favor of Calpine
which allows you to request that the period 2 volume  be no less than the
period 1 volume and up to the total delivered volume of 67,500 based on the
agreed to % discount as referenced in point #1.
ENA will forward the draft precedent agreement which will include the
necessary conditions precedent required and with the general commercial terms
as agreed per items above (ETA - Tues/Wed).
ENA will provide a bid to Calpine on Monday afternoon with a number on the
Spark Spread proposal.
Contact name @ Trans Canada and ANG is Kay Coad Ph: 403-267-2480.

I trust the information as provided above is consistent with our previous
discussions.  Please contact me once you have had a chance to review.

Regards,

BT


Bob Silvanik -- Council of State Governments annual meeting in Dec 8 (CEO
panel including Skilling and Hydro Qubecs Kayee?  Panel runs 10:45 - 12:15.
(606)244-8250


Hi Mike

I am definitely coming out for meeting on Monday - if you want to hit/play
before meeting let me know and I'll bring my stuff.

See you there.


Fred Philipson/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/01/2001 03:39 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: NDA Request

Sorry.  Can you purge anything from EnronOnline from this doc?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 3:26 PM
To: Philipson, Fred
Subject: Re: NDA Request

 << File: unbound technologies.doc >>

	Fred Philipson/ENRON@enronXgate 03/01/2001 01:31 PM 	   To: Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: NDA Request

Tana:

Can you please forward an NDA for Net Works and

UnBound Technologies, Inc.
5295 Hollister Road
Houston, Texas 77040

Voice: 832.590.1000
Fax: 832.590.1010
Email: info@unboundtech.com <mailto:info@unboundtech.com>

We are discussing applications and technology that we can develop and or
license from / to each other.

Thanks,

Fred Philipson
5-9323


Mark:  Thanks so much for your explanation earlier today.  Just one more
question, please:  is arbitration or litigation the preferance under English
law?  How often do you negotiate to the contrary?  Thanks.  Sara


I switched deal number 341242 to a sale and deal number 341270 as a buy


Mike,
In reference to our conversation today, attached is further information on
the Universal sponsorship and Enron-Universal business opportunities.

Jurassic Park Institute- A dinosaur-based educational/entertainment resource
targeting children/families.
Sponsorship's Four Components:
JPI Virtual Institute - Global online program (March, 2001)
JPI In-school Program - Grade-specific curriculum (August, 2002)
JPI Museum Tour - Cross-country tour (TBD)
JPI Headquarters - To be located in Universal Hollywood and Japan (2002)

Sponsorship donations begin at $250K and this could be divided among multiple
business units.

Enron Opportunities with Universal:
EBS - Content for Blockbuster
EMS
Enron Weather
Enron Credit
Enron Plastics & Petrochemicals

Colleen Koenig
Analyst, Enron Corp
Global Strategic Sourcing, Business Development
713.345.5326


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000074244&Page=MyReq.


Biliana,

I am glad I could help.
Look forward to working with you.

Vince

Biliana Pehlivanova <biliana_pehlivanova@yahoo.com> on 12/31/2000 08:19:52 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Biliana's resume

Mr. Kaminski,

I would like to thank you for forwarding my resume. I
have resently accepted Enron's offer for a position
with the Analyst Program and will be joining the
company in February.

Hope you had a merry Christmas and wish you a happy
New Year's!

Regards,
Biliana

--- Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> Biliana,
>
> I forwarded your resume to the HR person
> responsible for recruiting at your University
> with my recommendation.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> Biliana Pehlivanova <biliana_pehlivanova@yahoo.com>
> on 09/28/2000 06:02:20
> PM
>
> To:   vkamins@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Biliana's resume
>
>
> Mr. Kaminski,
>
>
> Thank you for referring me to your recruitment
> representative.
>
> Attached is my resume. I would appreciate you
> letting
> me know the name of the HR person whom I can folow
> up
> with.
>
> Best regards,
> Biliana
>
>
> =====
> ==================================
> Biliana Pehlivanova
> Vice President of Incoming Exchange
> AIESEC Houston
> 713 743-4927
> ==================================
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15
> Free!
> http://photos.yahoo.com/
> (See attached file: Biliana's resume.doc)
>
>
>

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/octet-stream
name=Biliana's resume.doc

=====
==================================
Biliana Pehlivanova
Vice President of Incoming Exchange
AIESEC Houston
713 743-4927
==================================

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/


Hey buddy.  I still work at Enron in downtown Houston.  Send me an
email at Chris.Germany@enron.com.   AND congrats on that wife thing.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davenport, Tim (TT)
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 1:45 PM
> To: Germany, Barbra (BE)
> Subject: RE: Hi
>
> Chris,
>
> It is good to hear from you.  Where are you working now?  Do you have an
> e-mail address at work or home?  How about a phone number?  You have been
> very difficult to keep up with.  How's your family?  Any plans to some
> down to this area?  If so, give me a call and maybe we can get together.
>
> I still just have one wife (same old one) but we are up to three kids.
> Two girls and a boy.
>
> Keep in touch,
> Tim D.
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Germany, Barbra (BE)
>  Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 1:37 PM
>  To: Davenport, Tim (TT)
>  Cc: 'chris.germany@enron.com'
>  Subject: Hi
>
>  Hi Tim.  It's Chris Germany.  My sister-in-law brought her laptop
> with her to East Texas.  She said I could send you an email.  How come you
> never call anymore??
>
>  Just kidding.  Take care of yourself.  Maybe we can get together
> sometime.  By the way, how many children do you have (3 or 4)?  How many
> wives?
>
>  Later
>  cg


Forgot to include you on this.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/29/2000 08:56 AM -----

	Steven J Kean
	12/28/2000 09:19 PM

		 To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Meeting with Governor Davis, need for additional
comments/suggestions

We met with Gov Davis on Thursday evening in LA.  In attendance were Ken Lay,
the Governor, the Governor's staff director (Kari Dohn) and myself.  The gov.
spent over an hour and a half with us covering our suggestions and his
ideas.  He would like some additional thoughts from us by Tuesday of next
week as he prepares his state of the state address for the following Monday.
Attached to the end of this memo is a list of solutions we proposed (based on
my discussions with several of you) as well as some background materials Jeff
Dasovich and I prepared.  Below are my notes from the meeting regarding our
proposals, the governor's ideas, as well as my overview of the situation
based on the governor's comments:

Overview:   We made great progress in both ensuring that he understands that
we are different from the generators and in opening a channel for ongoing
communication with his administration. The gov does not want the utilities to
go bankrupt and seems predisposed to both rate relief (more modest than what
the utilities are looking for) and credit guarantees.  His staff has more
work to do on the latter, but he was clearly intrigued with the idea.  He
talked mainly in terms of raising rates but not uncapping them at the retail
level.  He also wants to use what generation he has control over for the
benefit of California consumers, including utility-owned generation (which he
would dedicate to consumers on a cost-plus basis) and excess muni power
(which he estimates at 3000MW).  He foresees a mix of market oriented
solutions as well as interventionist solutions which will allow him to fix
the problem by '02 and provide some political cover.
Our proposals:  I have attached the outline we put in front of him (it also
included the forward price information several of you provided).  He seemed
interested in 1) the buy down of significant demand, 2) the state setting a
goal of x000 MW of new generation by a date certain, 3) getting the utilities
to gradually buy more power forward and 4) setting up a group of rate
analysts and other "nonadvocates" to develop solutions to a number of issues
including designing the portfolio and forward purchase terms for utilities.
He was also quite interested in examining the incentives surrounding LDC gas
purchases.   As already mentioned, he was also favorably disposed to finding
some state sponsored credit support for the utilities.
His ideas:  The gov read from a list of ideas some of which were obviously
under serious consideration and some of which were mere "brainstorming".
Some of these ideas would require legislative action.
State may build (or make build/transfer arrangements) a "couple" of
generation plants.  The gov feels strongly that he has to show consumers that
they are getting something in return for bearing some rate increases.  This
was a frequently recurring theme.
Utilities would sell the output from generation they still own on a cost-plus
basis to consumers.
Municipal utilties would be required to sell their excess generation in
California.
State universities (including UC/CSU and the community colleges) would more
widely deploy distributed generation.
Expand in-state gas production.
Take state lands gas royalties in kind.
negotiate directly with tribes and state governments in the west for
addtional gas supplies.
Empower an existing state agency to approve/coordinate power plant
maintenance schedules to avoid having too much generation out of service at
any one time.
Condition emissions offsets on commitments to sell power longer term in state.
Either eliminate the ISO or sharply curtail its function -- he wants to hear
more about how Nordpool works(Jeff- someone in Schroeder's group should be
able to help out here).
Wants to condition new generation on a commitment to sell in state.  We made
some headway with the idea that he could instead require utilities to buy
some portion of their forward requirements from new in-state generation
thereby accomplishing the same thing without using a command and control
approach with generators.
Securitize uncollected power purchase costs.
To dos: (Jeff, again I'd like to prevail on you to assemble the group's
thoughts and get them to Kari)
He wants to see 5 year fixed power prices for peak/ off-peak and baseload --
not just the 5 one year strips.
He wants comments on his proposals by Tuesday.
He would like thoughts on how to pitch what consumers are getting out of the
deal.
He wants to assemble a group of energy gurus to help sort through some of the
forward contracting issues.
Thanks to everyone for their help.  We made some progress today.


During one of the World Hunger calls a couple weeks ago I noted that the
later half of Performance Liquidated Damage refund provision in Section
10.9.8 was slighty  broken.   I volunteered to find what I thought it should
look like.   In reviewing the Arcos contract I found the corresponding
provision that seems to capture what I was concerned about.  I have included
the ARCOS provision below for everyone's review.  Some of the defined terms
do not match, but.....

14.18.2.2 If the corrections to reduce a Shortfall are completed before the
Power Island achieves Acceptance and:
(i) such corrections are made and are complete prior to commercial operation
of the Station, and
(ii) such corrections cause a reduction in the performance Shortfall
then Purchaser shall:
(a) refund to Seller an amount equal to the Performance Liquidated Damages
associated with such reduction in the Shortfall, and/or
(b) reduce the offset associated with such reduced Shortfall; however, such
reduction in offset or amount of refund shall not exceed the amount actually
offset (payment withheld) in accordance with Clause 30.8 or paid in
accordance with Clause 14.15 for such Shortfall.
14.18.2.3 If the corrections to reduce a Shortfall are completed after the
Power Island achieves Acceptance, and such corrections are completed within
one hundred eighty (180) days after the Power Island achieved Acceptance, and
such corrections cause a reduction in the performance Shortfall, then
Purchaser shall:
(a) refund to Seller an amount equal to the Performance Liquidated Damages
associated with such reduction in the Shortfall, and/or
(b) reduce the offset associated with such reduced Shortfall;
however, such refund of Performance Liquidated Damages or reduction of offset
will not exceed the amount actually offset in accordance with Clause 30.8 or
paid in accordance with Clause 14.15 for such Shortfall and the amount of
such refund or reduction of offset shall itself be reduced by the following
amounts for each day that passes from date of the Performance Test on which
the Performance Liquidated Damages were originally based upon until the date
that Seller demonstrated the improved performance:
(c) At a rate of $0.23/day for each kW that the Net Electrical Output
Shortfall of the Power Island is reduced (the "Output Liquidated Damages
Refund Reduction").
(d) At a rate of $45.00/day for each kj/kWh that the Net Heat Rate Shortfall
of the Power Island is reduced (the "Heat Rate Liquidated Damages Refund
Reduction").
14.18.2.4 No refund of Performance Liquidated Damages shall be made if the
corrections are made after one hundred eighty (180) days after Acceptance of
the Power Island, unless Purchaser elects to do so as a result of the
corrective action plan presented by Seller prior to the expiry of such one
hundred eighty (180) day period.  In the event Seller determines the cause of
a portion or all of the Shortfall prior to the expiry of the one hundred
eighty (180) day period following Acceptance, but in spite of its reasonable
efforts is not able to effect the necessary corrections to the Plant, Seller
may present a correction plan that extends beyond such one hundred and eighty
(180) day period. Purchaser, at its sole discretion, may elect to permit
Seller the opportunity to make such corrections.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Ruscitti, Kevin
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 7:49 AM
To:	Williams, Jason (Trading)
Subject:	resend


Mike Gioffre
dgioffre@hotmail.com

From: EASBDA@aol.com
To: Sonrie1122@aol.com, SpinDoc120@aol.com, DanielsP@citibankusa.com,
angelaeyre@juno.com, dgioffre@hotmail.com, gioffrem@aeltus.com,
penelopegi@juno.com, KerryHaley@aol.com, ehannum@msn.com,
sinsalaco@hotmail.com, smeany@theskmgroup.com, marshcroft1@yahoo.com,
TaxiMom222@aol.com, mckearin.cj@pg.com, gmckearin@rjfs.com,
EiGraphics@aol.com, tj.pallatto@malfie.com, Celp60@aol.com,
findmap@yahoo.com, WILMTAXI@aol.com, dsalmon@visa.com,
eshields24@home.com, jsilver@familynetwork.com,
smithd@1st-annapolis.com, sweeny@ulticom.com, GETMOM@aol.com,
Svanella0914@aol.com, jeremy.whisnant@gateway.com,
boomstei2@hugheshubbard.com, Walter.Douglas@chase.com
Subject: A first-hand account
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 19:33:07 EDT

Below is an unbelievably chilling account of one person's experience
yesterday.
I hope this finds you all safe and well.

Adrienne Greenheart, Writer
I was one who wanted a better look. I wanted to get closer. And the price I
paid was leaving my shoes in the middle of a pile of suffocating bodies.  At
the Wall St. train stop people were covered with papers.  A plane crash.
That's what everyone said.  Then a boom.  Everyone ran.  I ran to my office
on Wall and Pearl and called my brother in Illinois.
I wanted to be closer.  At the corner of Church and Broadway, I angled my
way
through a large, packed crowd to get the best view.  We talked about people
jumping.  The police stood behind the yellow tape.  Minutes later, there was
a boom.  I thought it was a bomb, so I crouched, but people ran, so I ran.
I
couldn't see anything.  I don't know how far I ran.  Couldn't see where I
was
running.  Didn't know if I was in a street or next to a building. Didn't
know
what street I was on.  No one could talk because the dust filled our
throats.
  After about ten steps I tripped over a pile of people and then people
tripped on me.
I laid there. The only sound was the falling of dust and debris.  No one
moved under me.  The weight of people on top of me got heavier.  I couldn't
breathe. I knew we were all going to die in that pile.  I pulled myself out
of the pile.  My slip-ons slipped off.  I stood up and saw nothing.  Not
even
and inch in front of me.  I put my hands out and felt for something.  I
bumped into the brick side of a building.  I bumped into milk crates.  I
stopped. I had no idea what to do, and I knew everyone around me was
suffocating.  I thought about my Mom and dad, they would be so sad to hear
that I died.  I thought about my husband. Just married and I will not get to
live my life with him.  I thought about my brothers.  They would cry.  I
told
myself to just keep trying to find away to air, but I didn't believe I would
live.
I bumped into something that I could feel the top of, so I lifted myself up.
I worried I was going into the back of a dump truck, and I was scared I'd be
trapped.  I didn't know if there was fire, or a bomb.  I didn't know how to
protect myself ??" find air.  Go up? ??" so I didn't know for sure that a
dump
truck would be bad.  I think it was scaffolding.  I think I jumped over
piles
of bodies by climbing scaffolding.
I pulled myself into a building. What building? I don't know.  And I took a
breath.  I took two breaths.  I was sure the building would be bombed.  I
looked for stairs.  I kept thinking I needed clean air.  I found a bathroom.
I didn't realize I wanted water until it was there.  Four men inside. Two
fighting   faucet.  I shared the toilet with another man.  We drank almost
the whole bowl.
Once the four of us were calmed by water and air, we ventured outside the
bathroom.  We walked up stairs. S lowly.  We checked doors behind us, left
them all open.  We got up only one floor.  We waited.  I cried.  They shared
one can of apple juice.
The intercom in the building announced stay where you are.  I was so
relieved
to know people knew we were there.  The intercom announced again and I
thought another bomb would go off and I'd die.  I cried.  The guy with the
apple juice put his arm around me.  I wondered why no one else cried.  The
intercom announced to go down the stairs.  I picked up a wastebasket: I
planned to fill it with water.  Planned to use it to shelter myself from the
next bomb.  (I still had no idea the building collapsed.)
In the lobby of the building someone gave me a Nantucket Nectar and told me
to vomit.  I walked outside the building with the drink in my wastebasket.
There was no one around. White everywhere.  The four of us had nowhere to
go.
  I couldn't remember where I was.  I walked toward the water.  Police
directed very one north.  I asked a woman next to me, "Where are we going?"
She said, "I don't know."  She had no dust.  She looked so steady.  I
followed her.  This was the beginning of her long protection.
She said, "You can walk home with me.  You need a shower."  I coughed.  She
asked why I was carrying a wastebasket.  I said, "In case there's another
bomb."  She held on to my arm as we made our way next to the river.  In
Chinatown, she bought me shoes.  At the Bowery we finally found a pay phone
that didn't have a line of people.  So she called her husband and I sat down
next to my wastebasket.  It was the first time I sat down, and I started
crying.
We resumed walking.  Sometimes we ran.  I made sure to keep up and I didn't
tell Teresa that I was worried that I would faint.  I drank Nantucket Nectar
every time I got dizzy.
At 59th St. a plane went overhead and I screamed.  In front of
Bloomingdales.
  There was no one there from Wall St. I knew I looked crazy.  I screamed
anyway.  I reminded everyone there were no planes allowed to fly.  Someone
said, "It's the army."  I came out from under my wastebasket and kept
walking.  Theresa's apartment was 71st on the Upper West Side. Where
everyone
looked fine.
In the shower, dripping debris down my body, I remembered one more moment
under the rubble.  When I couldn't breathe. When I couldn't see.  In the
middle of the dead quiet was a voice.  He said, "Is there anyone here? Can
someone hold my hand?" I reached out to the voice, and held his hand.  It
was
shaking and the skin was old.  I squeezed and then I let go.

Betty Sweeny
Business Development Associates, Inc.
Tele: (302) 762-7340
Fax: (302) 762-7348
Email: <A HREF="easbda@aol.com">easbda@aol.com

</A>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Daren - was there a deal for 5.000 at CP&L on Feb. 21?  CP&L shows 5.000, but
I have looked in MOPS and there is not a deal.  Can you verify whether or not
there was a deal for that day?  Thanks.

Aimee

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 01:39
PM ---------------------------

Rebecca Griffin@ENRON
03/20/2001 01:18 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Central Power & Light

Aimee,

I received a call from CP&L about the February 2001 production invoice.  They
are showing 5,000 mmbtu on February 21 for HPL.  We are not showing anything
for HPL on that day.  Could you verify if this is correct?

Thanks for your help.

Rebecca


Kay:

    Sounds fine to me.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:38 AM
To: Sager, Elizabeth; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Tweed, Sheila; Adams, Suzanne
Subject: Thursday

I'm going to take today as a vacation day, since what I need to do today I can handle from home.

I'll be in tomorrow.

Thanks,

Kay


Check out this website  http://www.hlsr.com/


Notice No.  00-341
October 4, 2000

TO:
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBER FIRMS
ALL COMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS

FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:Approved Amendment to Aluminum Futures Contract Rule 23.06
"Deliverable Metal Specifications"

The Exchange has received approval from the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission to amend COMEX Rule 23.06, "Deliverable Metal Specifications" of
the Aluminum Futures Contract.  The approved amendment to Section (B) Shapes
of Rule 23.06 increases the weight of the aluminum T-bars deliverable against
the Aluminum Futures Contract from fifteen hundred seventy-five (1,575)
pounds to seventeen hundred thirty-five (1,735) pounds.

The approved amendment is effective immediately.

A copy of the approved amendment is attached.  Capital letters indicate
additions; [ ] indicate deletions.

Should you have any questions or require any further information please
contact Albert J. Getz at 212-299-2608.

Aluminum Futures Contract

Approved Rule Amendment
Capital letters indicate additions; [ ] indicates deletions.

Rule 23.06  Deliverable Metal Specifications

(B) Shapes

      Aluminum tendered against each contract shall conform to one of the
following shapes.

(1) Sows weighing from six hundred (600) to fifteen hundred seventy-five
(1,575) pounds; or

(2) T-bars weighing from six hundred (600) to [ fifteen hundred seventy-five
(1,575) ] SEVENTEEN HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE (1,735) pounds.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-341)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 5/14/01.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923, Russell Diamond at x5-7095, or Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.


Continental

"Hallmark, Diem" <Diem.Hallmark@Williams.com> on 11/13/2000 04:54:03 PM
To: "'Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com'" <Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

Just to make sure... it's with Continental, right?

See you soon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com [mailto:Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 4:33 PM
To: diem.hallmark@williams.com
Subject:

DM,

My itinerary is as follows:

Friday, November 17

Departure:  Houston (IAH) 2:26 PM

Arrival: Tulsa 3:50 PM

Continental Flight 1667

Monday, November 20

Departure: Tulsa 8:39 AM

Arrival: Houston (IAH) 10:10 AM (not that you care)

If you need to reach me after I land, my cell phone number is 713-306-0760.

Looking forward to seeing you guys,

Andy


Kay -

Can you let me know if we have a confidentiality agreement with Cygnifi
Derivatives Services, LLC.  They are looking to enter into an agreement with
Enron Credit (US).

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Today we released additional information about our related party and off-balance sheet transactions.  We have made this information available both on our website and in a Form 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The information provides further details about:

	-- the $1.2 billion charge to shareholders' equity announced in the third quarter and the transactions related to that charge;
	-- a restatement of prior years' financial statements to reflect this reduction in shareholders' equity, the consolidation of     three entities and prior year proposed audit adjustments and reclassifications;
	-- the Special Committee appointed by the Enron Board of Directors to review transactions between Enron and related parties;
	-- the LJM limited partnerships, including a discussion of transactions between Enron and LJM entities; and
	-- transactions between Enron and other Enron employees.

This information addresses a number of concerns that have been raised by our shareholders and the SEC.  As our Board's new Special Committee continues its review of various matters, we will continue to cooperate fully with the SEC in its investigation, and we will continue to respond to investor requests so that they can evaluate, appreciate and appropriately value the strength of our core businesses.

Restatement of Earnings

Based on information that we have recently obtained, Enron and its auditors determined that certain off-balance sheet entities should have been included in Enron's consolidated financial statements pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles.  As a result, Enron will restate its financial statements from 1997 to 2000 and for the first and second quarters of 2001.  These restatements have no material effect on Enron's current financial position.  Here are some details included in the filing:

Net income for each period will be impacted by the retroactive consolidation of Joint Energy Development Investments (JEDI) and Chewco beginning in November 1997, the consolidation of an LJM1 subsidiary for 1999 and 2000 and prior year proposed audit adjustments.  Enron's current assessment indicates that the restatement will include:

	-- a reduction of approximately $96 million in 1997
	-- a reduction of approximately $113 million in 1998
	-- a reduction of approximately $250 million in 1999
	-- a reduction of approximately $132 million in 2000
	-- an increase of approximately $17 million for the first quarter of 2001
	-- an increase of approximately $5 million for the second quarter of 2001
	-- a reduction of $17 million for the third quarter of 2001.

The consolidation of JEDI and Chewco also will increase Enron's debt by approximately $711 million in 1997, $561 million in 1998, $685 million in 1999 and $628 million in 2000.

The restatement will have no material impact on Enron's reported earnings for the nine-month period ending September 2001.

You can obtain more detailed information on the items described above by accessing the Form 8-K filing at <http://www.enron.com/corp/sec/>.

We will continue to review our strategic, operational and financial position, and we will continue to keep you updated on any developments.


we got this legal & privacy section from EOL.  do we need to include this
information ?

thanks,  mve
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 04:24
PM ---------------------------

meiben@ect.enron.com on 11/30/2000 04:21:03 PM
Please respond to meiben@ect.enron.com
To: michael.eiben@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Legal And Privacy Information.htm

LEGAL AND PRIVACY INFORMATION

1. All information and material including images, text and audio on this
website is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its subsidiaries (and/or its or
its subsidiaries' licensors) (collectively "Enron") and is subject to
copyright.Trading Innovation, Endless possibilities, Enron.com, Enron, Enron
& design, Enron Corp., Enron Corp. & design, Enron with fanciful E, Enron
with fanciful E (color), are all trademarks owned by Enron Corp. All other
trade marks on this website are the property of their respective owners. You
are entitled to view, copy and print any documents from this website but only
for your own internal business purposes. Any sale, transmission or
redistribution of this website or its content, and any copying, modification
or other use of this website or its content for any purposes other than your
own internal business purposes, are strictly prohibited.
2. This website is provided solely for information purposes and, with the
exception of this "Legal and Privacy" statement, is not intended to, and
shall not, constitute any offer or acceptance with respect to any
transactions or other matters. This website shall not create any legal
relationship between you and Enron, unless you have signed a Password
Application, in which case the Online User Agreement and all terms and
conditions referred to therein shall govern your access and utilization of
this website. Copies of the Online User Agreement may be obtained through the
"Registration" Section on this website. This website is intended only for
commercial enterprises in certain specified jurisdictions.
3. This website and the information and material which it contains are
subject to change at any time by Enron without notice and Enron reserves the
right to suspend, terminate or restrict your access to or use of this
website. All warranties, whether express or implied, as to the accuracy or
completeness of the information contained on this website or in respect of
any materials or products referred to on this website are hereby excluded to
the extent permitted by law.

NETSCAPE NETCENTER	spacer	??Search??-??WebMail??-??My Netscape??-??Buddy Chat??-??Help
??-??Download??
		spacer

Check out our advertiser! Click here.

	[IMAGE]Home > ?Netscape?Search		?[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	Search Results

		- Search Categories -Arts & EntertainmentBusinessComputing &
InternetGamesHealthHome &
FamilyNetscapeNewsRecreationReferenceRegionalScience &
TechnologyShoppingSociety & LifestylesSportsWorld
			[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

	Search Here:
	[IMAGE]
	amazon.com
	 legal and...
	Buy Books Here
	Holiday Shopping

	[IMAGE]

	Click here!

	?

	[IMAGE]
	Specialized Searches
	Yellow Pages
	People Finder
	Maps and Directions
	Product Search
	Decision Guides
	Local Information
	International Search

	[IMAGE]
	Search again for
	'  legal and...  ' using
	Google

	[IMAGE]
	Learn More
	Search directly from your browser.
	Internet Keywords
	Netscape Search
	Affiliate Program
	Frequent Questions
	Tips on Searching

	[IMAGE]
	 Get Involved
	Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
	Become an Editor
	Suggest a Site
	Give Feedback

	Get the latest
	Communicator.
	  [IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

					Search Results for ' legal and privacy page
					[IMAGE]

					[IMAGE]
					Reviewed Web Sites
					Web sites reviewed and categorized by a team of editors.
					1 - 1 ?of ? 1

					 CPierson's Cyberlaw Page
					Links to cases, statutes, and legal information relating to the Internet,
including First Amendment, intellectual property, privacy, commerce, and
crime.
					http://www.cpierson.com/
					found in:? Society > Law > Legal Information > Computer and Technology Law
?>? Legal Links
					?

					[IMAGE]

					 Search for 'legal and privacy page' with these other search engines:
					AltaVista |  AskJeeves | Excite | GoTo |  HotBot | LookSmart | Lycos

					[IMAGE]
					??Search Again or Ask a Question
					[IMAGE]

					???
						[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	??Netcenter Help??-??Site Map??-??Advertise with Us??-??What's
New??-??What's Cool 	[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
Check out our advertiser! Click here.
,?2000 Netscape. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy


The report named: NG - PROPT P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/02/2001>, published as of 11/02/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Ron,

Thanks for the great news.  Also thanks so much for the gifts that I just
received.  I wrote you a separate note on Friday, but I wanted to thank you
again. The car is great and it arrived in a time of chaos and was a very
pleasant distraction.

I am gathering information on my BMW so that I can sell that to the
dealership at the same time I pick up my new car.  I will have all my lease
information with me.  I have a few months left on the lease and will have all
the needed information to complete the transaction.  If you would, please
forward this to or let me know who I should deal with at the North side
dealership.  I don't want another Bob Brooks situation to occur.  Also I
don't want him dealing with the purchase of my BMW since I believe he is in
that part of the dealership now.   I expect a fair price for my car and with
our history, I don't want him involved in pricing my car.  I am confident
that someone else will be better to deal with and will give me a fair deal
with my cash purchase for the CL.  I guess I just need a name at the
dealership.

Thanks,
mike

"Ron Shangle" <SHANGLE@mbusa.com> on 09/08/2000 12:05:13 PM
To: Mike.McConnell@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: CL 500

Mike:
I am in San Francisco on a short vacation (wife's Zurich, Switz. high school
reunion).  However, I made a call this am to the Jacksonville, FL port and
your car has arrived.  They could not give me any details yet as they are in
the process of surveying (inspecting) all the cars that came off the ship
whch is stanadard operating procedure.  Since your planned trip is in October
and today is 9/8, I have to assume that you should be in your car by then.
While I know what "assume" means, I also know that the port will not release
any car until they have inspected it and have determined that it has no flaws
(ie. scratched bumper that may have happened on the ship).  So, while I
really cannot give you a 100% guarantee as to when you will receive your car,
I do believe you should be fine for your trip to Dallas.  At times, it's a
frustrating procedure, but in the end it is the correct way to deliver a MB
and especially this type of car.
Ron

>>> <Mike.McConnell@enron.com> 09/06/00 05:47AM >>>

Ron,

I'm back in the office today and was of course thinking about my car.  Did
we make the dates you referenced earlier?  I have a weekend in Oct. that
will require a drive to Dallas to meet many of my old school friends and
was wondering if I would have the car.  Also, I have an extensive
international travel schedule coming and I can schedule around a possible
delivery date.

Thanks,
mike


Jack Walsh
1672 Tenth Ave
Brooklyn, NY 11215
jwalsh@brooklynx.org

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Jack Walsh


Sara,
Sorry, I was too assiduous in deleting what I thought would be duplicated on
this thread, so I'm working from memory on comments before Guenther's last
contribution.

Data for pricing is owned by Enron Credit Ltd (generated by employees of
Enron Power Operations Ltd whose costs are charged to ECL)
Information deals are done with ECL (Derivative transactions are currently
with Enron North America Corp, probably with Enron Credit Inc in the future)
The Enron staff who would be looking at this are employed by Enron North
America Corp which is why I suggested ENAC as the named party.
They clearly act for ECL on information deals.
If it's OK to use ECL then that would be easier for us.

I have no objections to suggestions that I should be promoted! In the
meantime, I am a board director of ECL and have both legal and group
management authority to sign contracts (with a lawyer's initials being a
prerequisite).

Regards,
Richard

From: Sara Shackleton on 16/02/2001 08:44 CST
To: Guenther Klar/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Denis
O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Confidentiality Agreement with Scana

Guenther:

Thanks for the response.  I'll wait to hear from Richard Sage as to who owns
the information.
Only officers at the VP level or higher may execute binding contracts for all
Enron U.S. companies (bylaws).  I do not know the "rule" for non-U.S.
companies (although I suspect the articles of association would contain that
information).

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Guenther Klar
	02/16/2001 08:24 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Denis
O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Confidentiality Agreement with Scana

Sara

You are right about the tax issue - in fact, we are in the process of
replacing the UK directors and officers of Enron Credit Inc with US directors
and officers.

The entity that signs up to the confidentiality agreement ought to be the one
that owns the information to be supplied.  Based on conversations I have had
with Richard Sage, I had formed the impression that the owner of the
information was Enron Credit Ltd.  If this is right, we should pursue your
first suggestion.  Otherwise, given that the tax issue is being rectified and
this should therefore be an isolated incident, I think we can wear the tax
risk inherent in your second suggestion.  Though I do wonder whether an
officer of Enron Credit Inc, such as Richard Sage (currently), could sign,
rather than a director?

Kind regards

Guenther Klar


Hello Shmuel,

Thanks for your message. The end of 2000 and the beginning of 2001 were
extremely busy
and I could not focus on PSERC issues. I shall consult a few people in Enron
on this subject and get in
touch with you. Our concern right now is that the results of research are
widely shared with
our competition.

I am out on the 19th, but the 20th would work for me. I would be glad to
cover the cost of your Austin
to Houston trip.

Regarding your son. The Analyst / Associate program will interview again on
the campus
in the spring and they will be more than happy to interview him.

"Shmuel Oren" <oren@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 12/19/2000 01:40:02 PM
To: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
cc: "Dennis Ray" <djray@engr.wisc.edu>, <Lance.Cunningham@enron.com>,
<Alex.Huang@enron.com>
Subject: Fw: PSERC nuggets related to market Stem

Hello Vince
Happy Holidays.
I wanted to connect with you regarding the possibility of Enron Joining
PSERC. As you might have heard from Lance and Alex we are going through a
transition period having doubled the number of universities and industry
members within the last year. Consequently, our business processes are not
well developed. One of the problems we are facing is the balance between the
electrical engineering folks and industry members that are more interested
in market related research. I hope to recruit more of the later so tat we
have more of a constituency in the Advisory Board  that sees the value of
market related research. I already have a verbal commitment from people at
Electrabell that expressed interest in joining PSERC. With members like
Electrabell and Enron we will be able to support more market Stem projects
such as the one that Shijie Deng proposed (not funded in this round). Please
let me know if I can do anything to facilitate the decision at Enron. I am
going to be in Austin on January 19 to participate at a PUCT hearing and
could come through Huston for a visit. Attached are some items that I shared
with our PSERC members and thought that you might be interested in them as
well.
Regards, Shmuel.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shmuel Oren" <oren@ieor.berkeley.edu>
To: "Power Systems Engineering Research Center" <PSERC-L@cornell.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: PSERC nuggets related to market Stem

> The following are 3 items that demonstrate the impact of PSERC research in
> the market stem area.
>
> 1. On December 12,  I (Shmuel Oren) testified at a hearing in San
Francisco
> before the Blue Ribbon Panel (chaired by Alfred Kahn) for the that is
> investigating the implications of Uniform Price vs. Pay as Bid Auctions in
> the California PX . As part of my testimony I presented a movie produced
by
> Tim Mount and Bob Thomas that show results of an experimental economic
study
> showing how bidders respond by raising their bids in a pay as bid auction.
> Following is an acknowledgement I received.
>
> Dear Shmuel:
>
>
> Thank you for attending the Blue Ribbon Panel this past Tuesday in San
> Francisco.  Your presentation was very informative and valuable to all the
> panel members and other participants.  The Panel greatly appreciates your
> involvement in this important project.
>
>
> Thanks again,
> Natalie Efland
>
>
> 2. A recent E-mail from the Texas PUC
>
> Professor Oren, I hope you and your family are doing well.  We are
seriously
> considering your help and advice to facilitate the Commission's final
> decision regarding retail competition in ERCOT.
>
>  I wanted to let you know that ERCOT Stakeholders filled an Application
for
> Approval of the ERCOT Protocols in November.  We received Comments
including
> List of Issues on November 22 and Reply Comments on December 1.  Staff
will
> draft and submit a Preliminary Order to the Commissioners for their
> discussion on December 13.  There will be a Pre-hearing on December 15
when
> parties will be asked to brief the Commission on list of issues by the end
> of first week in January.  There will be a Hearing on January 16 followed
> with another Hearing if needed.  Parties have asked the Commission to
> finalize its decision by mid March.
>
> To give you some more background, I have to mention that almost most of
your
> suggestions were accepted and will be reflected in the final Protocols,
> except for problems with intra-zonal gaming regarding congestion
management
> and Pay-As-Bid compensation for selected ancillary services.  A few
> additional concerns are raised regarding ancillary services and congestion
> management.  Stakeholders are still working toward more load participation
> in ERCOT market.  However, the main problem is the fact that market (pilot
> that covers 100% of wholesale, but only 5% of retail load) will be open on
> June 1, 2001 based on a version of the Protocols locked on August 1, 2000.
> (That was the deadline for ERCOT to give a final design to Anderson
> Consulting.)  That version does not include some of your recommendations
to
> address market design flaws.  The full version is highly possible to be
> implemented by January 1, 2002 when market for 100% retail competition is
> scheduled to open.  Given this gap, some parties have recommended not to
> implement incomplete Protocols and wait for full implementation by January
> 2002.  In other words, they say let's go ahead with 5% pilot retail load,
> but wait for full design implementation before allowing 100% wholesale
load
> (and retail load) be subject to the rules of the game described in the
final
> Protocols.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Parviz Adib, Ph. D.
> Director of Market Oversight Division
> Public Utility Commission of Texas
> 1701 N. Congress Avenue
> P.O. Box 13326
> Austin, Texas 78711-3326
> Ph. No.: 512-936-7365
>
> 3. The following is a segment from a published summary of the Dec 13 PUCT
> hearing. This segment describes the commision's deliberation on an agenda
> item addressing the possibility of instituting price caps as part of the
> ERCOT protocols. (see reference to my involvement in the next to last
> paragraph)
>
>   Docket No. 23220 - Petition of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas
> for Approval of the ERCOT Protocols.  (Discussion and possible action)
> Parviz Adib, Jess Totten, Keith Rogas, and Tammy Cooper
> Chairman Wood turned to page 2 item number 3 of the draft order
identifying
> issues, recommending that the word "including" be changed to "other than"
in
> the parentheses.  He thinks they know the ups and downs of the two
> mechanisms, which are bid caps and price caps, but would not mind having
> parties focus on what other protections might be used.  Commissioner Walsh
> would say "including, but not limited to" because she does not think it is
a
> bad idea for ERCOT to at least consider in their protocols a fail-safe
> mechanism.  It's kind of like the stock market suspending trading when
> something crazy happens.  They could consider a maximum scenario, such as
> "we don't think this will ever happen but if it does we need to muffle
it",
> whether it is $1,000 or $99 or whatever it is.  They could consider
whether
> to put into the protocols a self-enacting price cap.  While not expecting
it
> to happen, if it did, you don't have to declare it an emergency and have
the
> Commission have to act.  Chairman Wood asked if they could leave the
> question without the parenthetical at all and just say "what protections
> should be added to avoid extreme price spikes."  Commissioner Walsh
> reiterated that she wants ERCOT to think about the unlikely possibility of
> unacceptable price spikes.  She would like for them to have their own
> fail-safe mechanism that is self-initiating as opposed to leaving that to
> having someone have to come in and act.  Commissioner Perlman stated that
he
> thinks the California-type price caps is what the concern is about.  He
> thinks everyone in this state is opposed to those, but he thinks the point
> Commissioner Walsh is making is an interesting one.  He had not thought
> about the circuit breaker idea, and it might have some merit.  He agreed
> that it was worth considering something like that.  Then the question
> becomes what the level is.  Chairman Wood suggested the wording "what
> self-implementing protections should be added to avoid the price spikes.
> Commissioner Perlman said he did not think anyone is talking about $250
> price caps.  Commissioner Walsh agreed, but noted that if the unexpected
> happens we should be prepared.  Commissioner Perlman indicated that if
> someone is making $10,000 in one particular hour that it probably does not
b
> enefit the market and is probably a windfall to them.  It is not something
> they would normally put in their business plan for determining whether
they
> are going to build a plant in Texas.  Chairman Wood stated that they want
to
> lean toward the market as heavily as they can on these issues.
>
> Chairman Wood noted that some of these issues date back to when Dr. Oren
was
> assisting the Commission, and asked if he could be brought back again.
> Staffer Dr. Parviz Adib said that staff had already talked to Dr. Oren and
> that he is available to assist the Commission further.  Chairman Wood
noted
> that Dr. Oren had helped people think outside the box without just
focusing
> on California.
>
> The final wording was clarified to state "self-implementing mechanisms"
and
> to delete the parenthetical part of the sentence in question.  The order
was
> approved as amended.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


When I travel for more than one day, I usually take my computer and use it on
the road.

Hope you are enjoying this perfect weather!

Love,

Kay

Bill and Rita McCall <bmccall@wcnet.net> on 02/05/2001 03:32:15 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Palacios

Hi,Kay Kay. Dad  and I just want you to know how proud we are of you. Looks
like you may have snow in New York. Stay warm. Is it O. K. for me to email
you there? We are going for a walk. Love you,Mother


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000 09:42 AM -----

	Jefflowney@aol.com
	10/24/2000 10:32 AM

		 To: mark.taylor@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Clean copy

 - ENRON 062000 GTC CLEAN.doc


Cima's IT and Supply Pool contracts are ready to nominate for 9/01/00.

Their IT contract is 27319

Their supply pool contract is 27320


Gentlemen,

We just delivered signed documents to EES on Project Blackwater and the deal
has effectively closed.  Thank you very much for all of your hard work over
the last couple of weeks and particluarly over the last couple of days.  This
was a tough deal with a lot of moving parts and your participation in getting
the first long-term power deal done with EES for Enron Compression Services
Company is greatly appreciated.  We look forward to working on additional
deals with more innovative structures going forward into 2001.

Sincerely,
Chris Hilgert


REDLINED DOCS WITH EXHIBIT B


Congrats on the CFA. I am actually fighting back today. How much time a week would you say you spend on yard work? I am thinking that I will go with a place more like yours. Let me know what you think. I am going to have to get Monica back.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cowan, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 1:51 PM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE:

Oops.

Hey, Mac and I are CFA's.  It is good to be done.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dorland, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 11:30 AM
To:	Cowan, Mike
Subject:

So much for being bullish.


The attached was filed with the FERC today.

 - BLF0525.DOC


Some more reading for you
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 16:18:14 -0500
From: "John Brunini" <JBrunini@brunini.com>
To: "Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com>
Subject: Enron Memo
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_184230CA.7F1E7237"

Attached is the Enron memo you requested.

 - contract issues.mem


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000
06:02 PM ---------------------------

Enron PAC@ENRON
06/15/2000 06:05 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Enron PAC Mail
cc:
Subject: PAC ENROLLMENT

Last year the Enron Political Action Committee (PAC) launched a campaign to
become a "million dollar PAC".  Enron employees, who provide all of the
funding for the PAC, responded and the Enron PAC reached its objective,
becoming one of the largest corporate PACs.  This year we face a new
challenge.  With the sale of EOG, the announced sale of PGE and normal
employee turnover, we have lost a significant number of consistent
contributors.  We are seeking your support.  If you are not a member, please
join.  If you are a member, we hope you will consider increasing your
contribution.

The Enron PAC is an essential tool in our effort to promote sound public
policy.  Our PAC funds support local, state and federal candidates, of both
parties, who support open markets, deregulation and customer choice.  Amounts
contributed may be used to make political contributions in connection with
federal and state elections and are subject to the limits of the Federal
Election Campaign Act.  While our PAC has grown thanks to our employee
contributions, it still generates just a fraction of the expenditures of
those who oppose these ideals.

This year, as always, we face challenges and opportunities for every one of
our businesses, including such issues as taxation and regulation of
e-commerce, electric industry restructuring, regulation of derivatives,
international trade and investment legislation, pipeline safety, local and
state decisions affecting the siting and interconnection of power plants and
a variety of environmental and tax issues.  Enron has a long and successful
track record of supporting and advancing good public policy.  That track
record depends on access to and regular communication with, decision makers.
The PAC provides that access - - it shows policy makers that real voters care
about what they are doing.

One of the best things about Enron is that we don,t just take things as they
are.  We challenge the status quo.  We ask why.  We change things.  The PAC
helps us do that.  We need you to help the PAC.  Sign up today - and please
consider the following contribution guidelines:

Manager    $500/year
Director     $750/year
Sr. Director/General Manager  $1,000/year
Vice President    $2,500/year
Sr. VP/Managing Director  $3,500/year
Executive Committee   $5,000/year

All contributions are voluntary and these guidelines are merely suggestions.
You are free to contribute more or less than the guidelines suggested and
Enron will not favor or disadvantage anyone by reason of the amount of their
contribution or their decision not to contribute.  You may refuse to
contribute without fear of reprisal.

Only U.S. citizens and resident-aliens living in the U.S. can contribute to
the Enron PAC.  The maximum contribution is $5,000 per year per individual.
An individual may not contribute more than $25,000 to all federal candidates
and committees within a calendar year.  The law requires that Enron report
name, address, employer and occupation for every person who contributes over
$200/year.

No portion of any contribution is deductible as a charitable contribution for
federal income tax purposes.

Thanks for your support!  Sign up now, or revise your current contribution
level by connecting with the PAC intranet site:

http://pacmembers.enron.com