FYI - Check my voice mail message that I left for you and call me when you
can.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 12:34 PM
---------------------------

Rick Buy
01/30/2001 11:01 AM
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Ted
Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: General Alarm---Enron Metals Recycling

A "Doorstep" inspection of this business was performed in accordance with our
procedures and apparently this business is a disaster!!! We need immediate
action on this up to and including shutting it down. This was the worst we
have seen at Enron and I don't even want to put in this email what I heard
was going on there.

We need a coordinated solution here asap to avoid a real disaster, if there
isn't one already. I'll speak with Rick Causey here about what immediate
action we should take but the more you guys can dig into this the better.
More to come.

Rick


how much did you hate that brit


Here are the most recent memos.  A second e-mail will provide another memo.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3817
Houston, Texas 77019
Tel: (713) 345-8347
Fax: (713) 646-3393
e-mail: angela.davis@enron.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Brownfeld, Gail
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:23 AM
To: Marks, David; Keeney, William
Cc: Haedicke, Mark E.; Schuler, Lance; Davis, Angela
Subject: BNYCP Litigation Analysis:PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

Attached are the memoranda prepared by outside counsel assessing the BNYCP litigation.  To avoid as much confusion as possible, I suggest reading the Andrews & Kurth memo first, the Bernstein memo second and the risk matrix last.
In a nutshell, all agree that this is a very fact intensive case and that there has been little factual discovery to date.  It is also agreed that we have been denied the benefit of some of the evidence available as a result of the confidentiality obligations in place. Accordingly, much of the analysis provided is really counsel's "best guess" based on the information available.
That being said, there seems to be a general agreement that, based on the facts currently available and the "quick and dirty" analysis that we have been able to do, the exposure ranges from approximately $20 to $50 million. Interest and attorney fees could also prove significant.
I am available to discuss this further if you think that would be helpful.  Thanks for your patience.


looks like classes begin aug 14.

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cancun

Check out www.palaceresorts.com and go to Moon Palace.  Runs about $1200 for
a 3 night stay/couple.  I am not full of shit, I will do it.


Dear Mr. Skilling:

On behalf of the Musser -Schoemaker Leadership Lecture Series, I would like
to thank you for speaking at Wharton.  We appreciate you taking time out of
your busy schedule to share some of your knowledge with us.  I have written
an article for the Wharton Journal covering your lecture.  I thought you
might want to take a look at it.  I have attached it as an MS Paint file.

Sincerely,

Bryan Gitomer
Wharton '03

 - Jeff Skilling Article.bmp


Thanks for the update, Andrew.  Just let us know if what the ultimate outcome
is.  SRS

Andrew Miles
04/10/2001 04:39 PM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alhamd Alkhayat/NA/Enron, Jon Adler/NA/Enron

Subject: Re: Xcelerator idea

Hi Sherri!

I actually sent Gary an email this morning, thanking him for the idea.  I
don't think it is something we would want to pursue at this point - though it
isn't a bad idea.

Hope all is well with you.

Andrew

Jeff Skilling
04/10/2001 04:18 PM

Sent by: Sherri Sera
To: Gary Dreadin/GCO/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Alhamd Alkhayat/NA/Enron, Andrew
Miles/NA/Enron@Enron, Jon Adler/NA/Enron
Subject: Re: Xcelerator idea

Hamd, would you take the lead on this and keep Jeff posted?  Thanks, SRS

Gary Dreadin
04/10/2001 08:55 AM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Alhamd
Alkhayat/NA/Enron, Andrew Miles/NA/Enron@Enron, Jon Adler/NA/Enron
cc:

Subject: Xcelerator idea

Hello I didnt know which one of you to send this to so if you cant use it
please disregard.
Please see attached.


How funny!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/06/2001 09:12 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

No, he thinks he is God's gift to contracts.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/06/2001 09:08 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Is this his attempt at humor because he is on the email list.  I told them
you are on vacation, but they still want to have the call.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/06/2001 07:36 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Sometimes John forgets that he is not a lawyer.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 07:36
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
06/06/2001 07:31 AM
To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

 Next time you vote for me, please copy me on the email.

Kay

From: Scott Dieball@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/05/2001 05:44 PM
To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Vacation???  I've heard that tomorrow at the staff meeting Mark H. will be
rolling out the new policy of eliminating all vacation for ENA legal folks.

	John G Rigby
	06/05/2001 03:08 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Lets continue without Kay.  I think this call will be focusing on the
documents sent out already.

	Suzanne Adams@ECT
	06/05/2001 02:42 PM

		 To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Kay will be on vacation Thursday and Friday.  Can the call go on without
her?  Same time, 1:30 p.m. CDT?  Let me know please.

	John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	06/05/2001 02:25 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

lets make the change- GE cannot make it wednesday- plus the extra day gives
both GE and us time to review the exhibits and the new T&C draft.  given that
Sheila is in her "hostage situation", the other key person is Kay.   Thanks.

	Suzanne Adams@ECT
	06/05/2001 12:02 PM

		 To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

John, I'm not going to change the call to Thursday until I hear from you to
make sure you guys want it that way.  Thanks, Suzanne

	John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	06/05/2001 11:17 AM

		 To: stephen.swift@ps.ge.com@ENRON
		 cc: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, Bill.Williams@enron.com, Ed.B.Hearn.III@enron.com,
John.G.Rigby@enron.com, john.schroeder@ps.ge.com, kay.mann@enron.com,
kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, Lisa.Bills@enron.com, michael.barnas@ps.ge.com,
Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com,
Suzanne.Adams@enron.com
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Changing to Thursday works better for Scott Dieball, John Rigby and Peter
Thompson.

	stephen.swift@ps.ge.com
	06/05/2001 08:49 AM

		 To: Suzanne.Adams@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com, Ben.Jacoby@enron.com,
Lisa.Bills@enron.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com,
michael.barnas@ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, kay.mann@enron.com,
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com, Bill.Williams@enron.com, Ed.B.Hearn.III@enron.com,
John.G.Rigby@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Any chance of postponing until Thursday afternoon - same time?

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Suzanne.Adams@enron.com [mailto:Suzanne.Adams@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:09 PM
To: Sheila.Tweed@enron.com; Ben.Jacoby@enron.com; Lisa.Bills@enron.com;
Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com; Scott.Dieball@enron.com; Swift, Stephen L
(PS, CommOps); Barnas, Michael C (PS, Legal); Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE);
kay.mann@enron.com; Schroeder, John H Jr (PS, Sales);
Bill.Williams@enron.com; Ed.B.Hearn.III@enron.com;
John.G.Rigby@enron.com
Subject: Weekly GE Conference Call
Importance: High

The weekly conference call will take place at 1:30 p.m. CDT on Wednesday,
June 6, 2001.  EB38C1 has been reserved for those of you in Houston.

Dial In:       1-888-285-4585

Participant:   536220

Host:          121970 (Sheila)


Mike Sandridge and I finally spoke on the phone.  Here are the issues which
need to be addressed to keep things moving:

1. Which transformers go where?

2. How do we deal with the two cancelled units and any cancellation charges?

3. ABB has not had a good experience with an Enron LLC arrangement, and the
contract allows for them to request payment security.  Unless they are
convinced that they aren't at risk, they will want some form of payment
security.  The contract does allow for the equipment to be paid off (except
retainage) to facilitate the assignment.

Mike is available Thursday to discuss these issues, and how to get the break
out contracts closed. I'm available any time.

Kay


Sarah Novosel and I are hearing rumors from the FERC that the two new RTO
dockets on the agenda for tomorrow may be orders in the Northeast RTOs and
the Southeast RTOs respectively, requiring single regional RTOs.  The orders
are still being worked on, but may include technical conferences or
settlement judge proceedings.

Pat Wood is being credited again with pulling together a majority (including
Massey who has wanted a more aggressive approach in the RTO process) to get
these orders on the agenda and hopefully voted out.  We will try to get more
information and copies of the orders as soon as they are available.

Donna Fulton and Sarah Novosel

	Sarah Novosel
	07/06/2001 04:51 PM

		 To: Kevin M Presto/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Edward D Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Joe
Gordon/Enron@EnronXGate, Janelle Scheuer/Enron@EnronXGate, mbrown9@enron.com,
Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, John Llodra/Enron@EnronXGate, George
Wood/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul J Broderick/Enron@EnronXGate, Jason
Thompkins/Enron@EnronXGate, Mason Hamlin/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert
Stalford/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom May/Enron@EnronXGate, Gautam
Gupta/Enron@EnronXGate, Narsimha Misra/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Garrett Tripp/TOR/ECT@ECT, Berney C
Aucoin/Enron@EnronXGate, Jason Thompkins/Enron@EnronXGate, Rob
Wheeler/Enron@EnronXGate, Rogers Herndon/Enron@EnronXGate, Jim
Meyn/Enron@EnronXGate, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Pearce W Hammond/HOU/EES@EES, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Thane
Twiggs/Enron@EnronXGate, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Charles Decker/HOU/EES@EES, Nick
Politis/Enron@EnronXGate, sscott3@enron.com, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, James
D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate,
Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard
Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC Agenda

FERC has two meetings in July (July 11 and 25) and then is on recess for the
month of August.  The next FERC meeting after July will not be held until
September 12.  Consequently, FERC tries to get out as many orders as it can
in July so the backlog is not as great in September.

Consistent with that goal, FERC has included a lot of cases on its July 11
agenda.   While some of these cases may be stricken from the agenda for July
11(and either deferred to the July 25 meeting or until September), we are
still expecting a lot of action from FERC in July.  The following cases are
on FERC's July 11 agenda:

RTO Proceedings

Alliance RTO

SPP and Entergy RTOs

PJM and PJM West RTOs

New York RTO

New England RTO

RTO West

Southern RTO

Two new RTO dockets entitled "Regional Transmission Organizations"

Other Proceedings

Mirant vs. ISO New England (June 20, 2001 complaint by Mirant regarding ISO's
proposal to revise procedures for mitigation of generators run out of
economic merit order during transmission constraints).

NYSEG v. NYISO (regarding ISO's hybrid fixed block pricing rule)

NERC (these are old docket numbers that go back to orders issued in 1999
regarding TLR -- Southern and VEPCO sought rehearing of the TLR procedures in
June, 1999, arguing that they could result in shedding load.  FERC may be
responding to those rehearing requests).

HQ v. NYISO (regarding HQ's request for FERC to order ISO to reinstate the
May 8, 2000 market clearing price)

Maine PUC vs. New England ISO (regarding the PUC's complaint against the NE
ISO asking FERC to direct the ISO to recalculate the energy clearing price on
May 8, 2000).

California Proceedings

San Diego Gas & Electric v. Sellers (Docket No. EL00-95-038 -- several
parties have already sought rehearing of the June 19 order -- this could be a
non-substantive tolling order (putting on hold these requests for rehearing),
or it could be something more substantive.

Removing Obstacles to Increased Electric Generation and Natural Gas Supply in
the Western United States

Please let me know if you have any questions concerning these proceedings.

Sarah


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <Ludkam@aol.com>
From: Ludkam@aol.com
Full-name: Ludkam
Message-ID: <5f.bb559e6.271a1a54@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 16:21:40 EDT
Subject: National Car Rental
To: VKaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 119

Palo Alto 650-856-9100  4218 El Camino Real, PA
1800-227-7368
www.nationalcar.com


Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 1/6/00.

Regards
Molly


Reference for future months.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2000 01:16 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           01/05/2000 09:26 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Theresa T Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bennett Kaufman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretel Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stella L Ely/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vacation, floating holiday request

Sally, Gary,

I would like the following vacation time off:
Monday, Jan 10th (changed from Jan 11th)
February 21-25
March 15 - 17

Thanks. Sheila


Shirley,

No problem.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
03/10/2000 07:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Vacation

Vince:

I just found out that it is Friday, April 7 and not Friday, March 31st
that I want to take for vacation.  Is this alright?

Thanks!

Shirley

Vince J Kaminski
03/08/2000 06:18 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Vacation

Shirley,

No problem.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
03/08/2000 03:56 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Vacation

Vince:

I would like to take the following days as vacation:

Wednesday, March 15th

Friday, March 31st.

Please let me know if this is ok with you.

Thanks!

Shirley


please check again for me, I have inactivated FT-VNG-IDX
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Trevino, Susan
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 2:53 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	RE: Inactivation of VNG

Phillip - I have checked all of VNG books and all of them are "Inactive" with the exception of FT-VNG-IDX and FT-VNG-PMT-PRC (this one should be active).

ST

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 2:40 PM
To:	Trevino, Susan
Subject:	Inactivation of VNG

I have inactivated the following books on the website(all risk types) please verify they are inactive:
FT-VNG
FT-VNG-Storage
FT-VNG-Trans
Intra-VNG-Phy

There should only be one active book under VNG is FT-VNG-PMT-PRC(we will inactivate after value liquidates this month).  Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.
PL


Tanya:

Our FX desk has requested an ISDA Master Agreement for ENA's FX trades with:
Credit Suisse First Boston, London Branch.

The entity with which ENA already has an executed master (effective 4/21/93)
is Credit Suisse First Boston International, which trades derivatives.

I will have the name of the CSFB lawyer this afternoon.

Can you please prepare a credit worksheet?  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


The new SITARA to UNIFY bridge monitor is in production.

The monitor shows deals in error state (failed) or in queue to bridge
(pending) - for deals going to UNIFY from SITARA.

You will find it under - Start - Programs - Trading - SITARA - SU Bridge
Monitor.

You may need to load the Borland BDE v5.0 software to use this, if not
already loaded.

We enhanced the monitor to make it a more useful tool.

If deal is in an error state on the SITARA side - we have not sent it over to
UNIFY.
If the deal in an error state on the UNIFY side - SITARA has sent it to UNIFY
- however - it is in the UNIFY failed deal group.

You can sort by the columns - best to sort by business unit.

The date column - shows the last time someone edited the deal.
Start Date and Stop Date - are begin and end date of deal.

SITARA deal ID - as well as - EOL deal ID.

Indicates if the deal is an business unit is an agent on the deal.

If you are contract or validation support - please do not edit the STATUS = P
deals - these are the deals with pending status for desk to desk transactions
(awaiting the other desk to approve the deal or changes to the deal).  If you
release these deals - you will be the approver of the deal - as you have
access to multiple desks.

You can hit the refresh button to re-query the data - or set the auto refresh
on the tool bar.

We did not build Filter by Business Unit for multiple reasons:
- the expense to build the filter.
- it is easier to support if everyone is looking at the same thing.
- if there is a new business unit - you will see it.
- normally - there should not be more than a screen full of deals in error
state - once Petro Can/Suncor/Sunoco are set up - we will have a reasonable
  number to look at - and you can sort by the business unit column.
- If you do want to filter - you may do so - by using the send to excel
feature - under tool bar option - file - dump to excel.

If you have any questions or problems - please call the SITARA hotline.


The following email from IST provides information concerning the extensive
outage of network services on campus Sunday evening between about 7:00 and
9:30 PM.

Should you experience any continuing problems with computing services
please contact the information desk in the Computer Center, or helpdesk
at http://helpdesk.haas.berkeley.edu, phone 510/642-0434.

Thank you,

Haas Computing Services

>To: ucb-net-announce@uclink4.berkeley.edu
>Organization: Communication & Network Services
>Subject: [UCB-NET-ANNOUNCE] Electrical Outage, Evans Hall, 10/15/2000
>
>hi,
>
>at ~6:45PM PDT this evening, Sunday 10/15/2000, Evans Hall lost all
>electrical power.  PPCS was dispatched and determined the breaker on the
>12KV building feed had been tripped.  Power was restored at ~9:35PM;
>but as yet PPCS has not identified the cause of the outage and will
>continue their investigation tomorrow.
>
>the electrical outage caused a disruption in campus Internet/I2/calren2
>network connectivity as well as connectivity to hosts and resources
>within the Evans data center.  external network connectivity has since
>been restored and we understand that the data center is also in the
>process of bringing hosts affected by the outage back into service.
>the outage also disrupted Internet/I2/calren2 connectivity from UCDavis as
>their primary path transits equipment in Evans affected by the outage.
>
>...
>
>john hess
>ist-cns-oir, nocman
>jhess@uclink.berkeley.edu


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
08:19 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
03/06/2001 07:54 AM
To: audrau@yahoo.com, Memaw1995@aol.com, Kathy.Crenshaw@inteq.com @ Enron,
Kayla Crenshaw/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Anita
DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, kip.wia@alpha1.net,
emlea@usa.net, Kelly Summers/HOU/ECT@ECT, hmel5345@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Clintons leaving the Whitehouse...

Subject: Clintons leaving the Whitehouse...

<akClintons leaving White House jpeg (1).jpg>

 - akClintons leaving White House jpeg (1).jpg


Vince,

I agree with Alex on this issue.

As an alternative for sponsorship.  The UT electrical engineering dept. is
interested in sponsorship for research activities such as the one I just
completed or as Martin performed when he was at UT (just thought that I would
mention this as a possible alternative).  Would you be interested in a
presentation or a "brown bag lunch" on this subject?

Lance

Alex Huang
04/02/2001 08:55 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lance Cunningham/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: PSERC Industrial Advisory Board Meeting Invitation

Vince,
I think it is important to keep a good relationship with PSERC, but as of now,
it is not worth two days of your time to attend the board meeting.  Besides,
since
we are not a sponsor yet, we have virtually no voice in the meeting and our
presence
sometimes is awkward. Again, even if we are one of the thirty or so sponsors,
our
voice is rather limited, for most of the other sponsors have different
concerns from
ours.  One way to remedy this is to individually sponsor some research
projects, via
sumer intern or invited talks.

Alex


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000 04:25 PM -----

	Mitch Robinson@ENRON
	07/10/2000 01:06 PM

		 To: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Callaghan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Vibration Complaints at Gleason

Stuart -

Fyi.  Talked to Pete a few minutes ago.  We filed a warranty claim with
Westinghouse.  We will be running all units tomorrow, and we'll have a
Westinghouse engineer there to work on the problem.  Pete has since called
all the people below back to explain what we are doing to verify whether
there is a problem or not.

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 07/10/2000
01:02 PM ---------------------------

Pete McCormick@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/10/2000 12:36 PM
To: Tom Callaghan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mitch Robinson@Enron
cc:

Subject: Vibration Complaints at Gleason

Well, it continues. We have received 5 complaints from the vibrations
resulting from operation of Units #1 and #2. I have personally been to each
individuals residence since this morning to monitor for the vibrations and to
listen to the individuals. In all, every person just feels a little
frustrated by the problem, I have not ran across anyone that has been
unfriendly. Below I will list the individual complaints and my findings
visiting their residence.

Karen Ellis - Most likely the cause of most of the complaints, they are the
closest to the facility and have the most vibration from the units. While I
was at their residence I could feel the windows rattle, and at some points
feel the walls vibrate. There is a definite vibration present at this
residence.

Mr & Mrs. King - They called and complained but were unavailable to visit
their residence, they live in the same vacinity as Karen Ellis.

Lynda Stout - Very next house after Karen Ellis, stopped and visited with her
and Richard Black this morning, they are complaining about the vibrations but
while I was there I could not determine if there were any vibrations
occuring. Cannot eliminate the possibility.

Richard Black - Same as above, he seems like he may cause a little bit of
trouble. While I was visiting he said that he has rental property (the
trailer park) that he could not rent due to the vibrations. I could not
determine if Vibrations were present or not.

Clint Fuqua (something like that) - Lives in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION from all
other complaints. He stopped by this morning to complain (and pick up his
dog). I went to his house and visited, could not feel vibrations from his
residence, I believe if the wind direction were to change he would experience
some noise and vibration.

In all, everyone is just wanting to know if this will be permanent or just
temporary. I have explained to everyone that this will be temporary till we
can obtain the proper information to find a solution. The vibrations seem to
be getting worse as we run, I believe that Westinghouse has a problem in the
exhaust transition that they need to investigate.

I spoke with Curt Smith this morning and expressed the severity of this
problem and recommended that they get someone up here tomorrow, we are trying
to environmental testing out here tomorrow, I should know this afternoon if
this is possible.

We are also experienceing cracking in the exhaust area on the units,
Westinhouse is investigating as we speak. I believe they are associated.

Will keep you updated on the testing. Weare going to dispatch tomorrow, thats
why I want to get everyone out here if possible.

Peter


It looks like most of these assets relate to systems that Sally Beck's group uses.  These assets were moved off the ENA balance sheet earlier this year after discussions with you and Philippe.  Please advise if you want us to agree to these transfers.  Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Aune, Stacey A.
Sent:	Friday, August 31, 2001 10:52 AM
To:	Schield, Elaine
Subject:	ENW Assets to Transfer Back to EA
Importance:	High

Elaine,

Attached is a listing of the assets on ENW's books that they want to transfer back to EA.  The current book value as of 7/31/2001 is around $9 million dollars that would move into PP&E.

If you look at the numbers off to the right and the notes below, you will see that some of them were originally designated as shared assets or solely ENW and therefore would reside on ENW's books.

In completing their 2002 plan and meeting with their commercial people, ENW thinks these assets should be back on EA's books.

Please let me know if you agree to this.

Thanks,
Stacey


ECI - the Morgan guaranty

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2001 12:52 PM -----

	Tom Doukas/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/06/2001 12:22 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Morgan Guarantee letter

Sara,

Can you send the form of the guarantee letter to the following people at
Morgan.

Ketan.parekh@ms.com
Joseph.marovich@ms.com


[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE] 		[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE] 		[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 		   	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE] 		[IMAGE]

You are receiving this Special  Offer as a valued iExpect.com member. If you do not wish to receive any
Special Offers from us in the future, please click here   to unsubscribe.[IMAGE]


THANKS


Due to heavy rains and water damage on level B-2, Studio B and the Cycling
Studio have been closed for the rest of the week.  The following
modifications have been made for Thursday and Friday Group Exercise Class
Schedule.

Thursday, March 29, 2001
The following classes will be temporarily located in Studio A
11:30a.m. - 11:45a.m.  Ab Lab
11:45a.m. - 12:15p.m.  Step Express (Format changed to High/Low Sculpting
Class)
12:15p.m. - 1:00p.m.  NIA
5:45p.m. - 6:30p.m. Total Body Conditioning
6:30p.m.-6:45p.m. Ab Lab
11:45a.m.-12:30p.m. CANCELLED C.I.A.

Friday, March 30, 2001
The following class will be moved to the fitness floor.
6:00 am - 6:45 am  C.I.A. (Format changed to Cardiovascular Workout on
Precor/Fitness Floor)
12:00p.m.-12:45p.m.  CANCELLED C.I.A.

Maintenance is working to resolve the situation. We anticipate being fully
operational on Monday, April 2nd.  However, due to weather inconsistencies we
may experience unanticipated delays.  We will keep you posted as the
situation unfolds.

We appreciate your understanding.
Fitness Center Management


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		2
Task Due On:		6/6/2001
Task Start Date:	5/29/2001


Lloyd, thought we could bring this guy in for an interview.

Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: 	Wang, Steve
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:52 PM
To:	Thomas, Paul D.
Subject:	Professional Resume

 <<Brooks Hodnette 08_09_01.doc>>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

November 17, 2000 5:00pm through November 20, 2000 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

EI: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

LOTUS NOTES: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 11/18/2000 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 11/19/2000 at  8:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 11/18/2000 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 11/19/2000 at  6:00:00 AM PT
 Sun 11/19/2000 at  12:00:00 AM London thru Sun 11/19/2000 at  2:00:00 PM
London
Outage:  Unify
Environments Impacted:  Unify Users
Purpose: Rebuilding all the indexes and changing the number of partitions for
better performance
Backout: Restore from Backup
Contact(s):  William Mallary  713-345-3485
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
All Other Systems    (713) 563-5797  [Pager]
      or (713) 563-5987  [Pager]


Wow!  Enron employees and other Houstonians are showing such generosity!

The response to the blood drive has been outstanding.  Employees from Continental Airlines and other surrounding corporations have come to our blood donation site to give.  Blood Center personnel have informed us that because of the overwhelming response donations are now being taken on a first-come, first-served basis.  The Blood Center is attempting to keep appointments on schedule.  However, we ask for your patience and understanding if there is a delay.

It is indeed gratifying to witness your continued generosity to the community and beyond.


Check this out!
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 02:39
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Larry Jester @ ENRON                           12/13/2000 12:38 PM

To: Chris Dorland/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bear Market

---------------------- Forwarded by Larry Jester/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
01:37 PM ---------------------------

Don Baughman@ECT
12/11/2000 04:00 PM
To: shannontyer@email.msn.com, mstewart@pdq.net, reidstav@houston.rr.com,
travieso74@hotmail.com, PRHE@DYNEGY.COM, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
twomarshalls@hotmail.com, don.c.baughman@marshmc.com,
baughmanpatricia@hotmail.com
cc:

Subject:

 - salmon.asf


Start Date: 10/26/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102614.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/26/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_APS
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


Dan:  could you please confirm that state PUCs will accept partnership tax
forms from an LLC?

Jeff Dasovich:  could you please forward this to Steve Bowen, as I don't have
his e-mail address.  I also would like to know if you and Steve think that
the California commission would give us a hard time if we were to try to
transfer our ETI, Inc.  license to ETS, LLC or to re-apply as ETS, LLC.

Thanks.

	Richard Anderson@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	12/23/2000 02:13 AM

		 To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: David DeGabriele/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, James
Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Robin Hill/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: Set Up LLC for CLEC Activity

Sue,

Jim wants to think about this some more.  He's concerned about retaining both
Enron Telecommunications, Inc. ("ETI") and Enron Telecommunications Services,
LLC ("ETS, LLC").  As I recall, we decided to retain ETI because every state
regulatory authority may not accept a LLC , therefore, retaining ETI, our
existing  "C" corporation entity, for those jurisdictions gives us more
flexibility.  We also need to confirm that, if a state regulatory authority
does accept a LLC, then they will also accept a partnership tax return, (Form
1065), from that LLC, rather than requiring the LLC's members (the owners) to
forward copies of their corporate tax returns (Forms 1120).  Could you please
confirm this with your outside counsel?

As I think about it, if the state regulatory authorities will accept a LLC's
partnership tax returns (Forms 1065), then a better structure would be for
ETS, LLC to be 99.9% owned by EBS, Inc., (17H) and 0.1% owned by ETI (77P).

I'll keep you informed.  Please let me know what you learn from your outside
counsel.

Thanks,
Richard D. Anderson
Director of Taxes
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
713-345-7729 (Houston office 1/8 through 1/10, no voice mail)
503-886-0335 (Portland office and voice mail)
503-880-5249 (cellular)
503-425-6005 (fax)
richard_anderson@enron.net

	Sue Nord@ENRON
	12/22/00 07:54 AM

		 To: Richard Anderson/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Set Up LLC for CLEC Activity

What's up?

	Richard Anderson@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	12/20/2000 10:00 PM

		 To: Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue
Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, David DeGabriele/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 Subject: Re: Set Up LLC for CLEC Activity

Robin,

Please hold off on setting up these new entities until after the first of the
year.

Thanks,
Richard D. Anderson
Director of Taxes
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
713-345-7729 (Houston office 1/8 through 1/10, no voice mail)
503-886-0335 (Portland office and voice mail)
503-880-5249 (cellular)
503-425-6005 (fax)
richard_anderson@enron.net
----- Forwarded by Richard Anderson/Enron Communications on 12/20/00 07:59 PM
-----

	James Ginty
	12/20/00 07:33 PM

		 To: Richard Anderson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Set Up LLC for CLEC Activity

Lets discuss

	Richard Anderson
	12/20/00 07:27 PM

		 To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Robin Hill/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 cc: James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David
DeGabriele/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Essie Locklear/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Bernadine Nguyen/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Set Up LLC for CLEC Activity

Sue,

As we discussed yesterday and today, there are tax advantages and cash flow
advantages to doing business as a LLC rather than as a "C" corporation.
There do not appear to be any regulatory barriers in most states that prevent
a LLC from doing business as a CLEC.  There also may be requirements in
certain states to file copies of tax returns with the state regulators; thus,
it is preferable that we use a double member LLC rather than a single member
LLC so we can provide copies of the LLC's tax returns, rather than the EBS,
Inc., tax returns to regulators.

Robin,

To make this happen we need some new entities:

1.  "Enron Telecommunications Holdings, Inc.", a Nevada corporation wholly
owned by Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
2.  "Enron Telecommunications Services, LLC," a Delaware LLC, owned 99% by
Enron Telecommunications, Inc. and 1% by Enron Telecommunications Holdings,
Inc. .

Also, we noted that Company 77V, EBS Global Cable and Satellite, Inc., has
always been inactive, but is qualified in a number of states.  Please
withdraw this entity from all states except its state of incorporation.  We
can use it for the next deal that requires a separate subsidiary.

Thanks,
Richard D. Anderson
Director of Taxes
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
713-345-7729 (Houston office 1/8 through 1/10, no voice mail)
503-886-0335 (Portland office and voice mail)
503-880-5249 (cellular)
503-425-6005 (fax)
richard_anderson@enron.net


(arrangements have been made)


There was a discussion on this morning's call regarding the status of PUC actions regarding DA suspension.  We requested a legal opinion from out outside regulatory counsel.  It is attached.  If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact Sue Mara (415.782.7802) or me (415.782.7822).

Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: MDay [mailto:MDay@GMSSR.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:45 PM
To: 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'
Cc: 'Sue Mara at Enron SF'
Subject: Status of CPUC Proposed Decisions on Direct Access Suspension

Jeff:

At your request I am offering this memo to explain the status of the agenda
items before the CPUC on the issue of suspension of the direct access
program.  There are two pending draft decisions at this time, the first is
the proposed decision of ALJ Barnett (Item H-7 on the last agenda) which was
modified by a changed version submitted by Pres. Lynch at 2:45 pm on 9-5-01,
the day before the last meeting.  This version indicated that direct access
was suspended as of the date of the order (which would have been Sept. 6)
and states in another ordering paragraph that the utilities are to advise
their customers that the suspension is effective Sept. 6, 2001, specifically
naming that date.  This order would have been interpreted to suspend direct
access as of Sept. 6 if it had been voted out that day.  The other item,
Agenda Item H-7A on the last agenda, is the Bilas alternate decision which
calls for hearings to determine the impact of direct access on the issuance
of bonds, and does not suspend direct access at this time.

Please be advised that the suspension date contained in H-7 can and probably
will be changed before the orders are considered at the CPUC meeting on
Sept. 20.  Either the Sept 6 date will be changed to the 20th of Sept., or
some other specific date could be inserted at all the locations in the order
dealing with the suspension date.  All that is required to make this change
is the distribution of a changed page on the Escutia table before the
Commission meeting.  Thus, it is important for all direct access supporters
to continue to urge the Commission, especially Commissioner Brown, to
support a suspension date later than Sept. 6, because it is so easy for the
date to be altered under Commission procedures.

Please let me know if you require any additional information on this
subject.

Mike Day
Goodin, MacBride, Squeri, Ritchie & Day


Holli:

I have still not received the above-mentioned comments.  I have also not
received EWEB's proposed form of legal opinion.  I will go ahead and
blackline the Schedule once again.

When the lawyers last spoke, we agreed to execute all docs prior to the end
of the year.

Would you please call EWEB and inquire about these items?

Thanks.  Sara


I am excited to announce a major initiative called iBuyit, a new online
purchase and payment tool.  Each of you will be able to use iBuyit to order
or approve purchases from pens to pipe and cable to computers.  Our Global
Strategic Sourcing (GSS) and Global Accounting groups have teamed up with
each of your Business Units to build a tool designed to meet your specific
needs.

Special iBuyit features include:
? An eCatalog to help you quickly find the items you need
? Shopping baskets to store your purchases
? Simple recurring purchases
? Automatic routing of invoices for coding and approval

iBuyit will be implemented in stages across ETS, EBS, EES, EWS, Corporate and
Europe during 2001.

Over the next few months, you will be hearing more about iBuyit from your
business unit leadership, including what it can do for you and when you can
expect to use it.


We have decided to make Texas Gas Zone 4 an "East" desk pipe as oppossed to
"Market East".  Please let me know if you think there might be any problems.


please print
-- Forwarded Message --

>Fyi
>----------------------
>Forwarded by Christi L
>Nicolay/HOU/ECT on
>08/23/2000 03:26 PM
>---------------------------
>
> From:  Christi L Nicolay
>08/23/2000 03:35 PM
>
>
>To:
>dwatkiss@bracepatt.com,
>tabors@tca-us.com
>cc: Sarah
>Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron,
>Joe
>Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron
>Subject: RTO West Model &
>Scheduling
>
>Dan and Richard--The
>Consolidated model has
>some good language on a
>process that is very similar
>to what Enron wants to see in
>the "new" tariff that you
>are working on.   Also, when
>do you think you will have a
>first draft?  Thanks.
>----------------------
>Forwarded by Christi L
>Nicolay/HOU/ECT on
>08/23/2000 03:24 PM
>---------------------------
>
>
>Steve Walton
>08/09/2000 11:50 PM
>To: Christi L
>Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
>James D
>Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
>Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron,
>Sarah
>Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron,
>Charles
>Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT,
>tabors@tca-us.com
>cc:
>Subject: RTO West Model &
>Scheduling
>
>After our discussion today, I
>thought I should send you a
>copy of the state of model
>development in the
>Northwest.  This is a product
>of much effort and hard
>negotiation.  It may not be
>all we might want, but I think
>in the main it comes very
>close to what we discussed
>today.  There are also more
>details on firm, recallable
>and non-firm releases.
>
> -
>NWRTO-ConsolidatedCMmod
>el-080900.rtf
> -
>NWRTO-Scheduling-Overvie
>w-080900.rtf
>
>
>
><<NWRTO-ConsolidatedCM
>model-080900.rtf>><<NWR
>TO-Scheduling-Overview-08
>0900.rtf>>


Hello all,

Several of you have inquired who would be attending the May 17 Guggenheim
event on our behalf, whether Enron employees or guests.  While this list is
always in motion, this should give you a good idea.

I'm glad that each of you will be attending and hope that both you and your
guests enjoy.  Please call me on my cell phone at 713-515-9208 if you need
anything.  Otherwise, I will see you on the 17th at the Guggenheim.

Take care, Margaret Allen


ok, i'm laughing, thanks.  but NOW you get it!

Alexandra Saler@EES
01/23/2001 10:53 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

well aren't you Mr. Know It All!

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

you are a june birthday right?  i'm may, and  i don't think i'm a
dragon--it's done by birth year, no relation to zodiac.  still checking...

Alexandra Saler@EES
01/23/2001 10:41 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

you are a dragon b/c I am also a gemini.

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

I'm an 8 of clubs, and a gemini; checking on the chinese animal sign

Alexandra Saler@EES
01/23/2001 10:17 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

well...what are you?  I am not going to break up with one dog for another!

To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:

oh, i forgot to point out one more thing.  aren't you a dragon and mark a
dog?  should i call the ghostbusters?

ok, i'll stop


Jill,

Just dropping a note to say hi!

Will write more soon.

Chris


SB 1x passed the State Senate late this afternoon  by a vote of 25-12.
Senator Soto spoke in support arguing that the  money should be returned to
taxpayers.? The flate rate of the refundable  tax credit will be determined
by the FTB.? Senator Scott said that FERC has  failed to act.? This bill will
regulate the price of electricity in  CA.? He said that the PUC will be
allowed to review and adjust the base  price for the tax, and that the PUC
could allow additional exemptions (is this  an unconstitutional delegation of
authority?).? Also, a long-term contract  arrangements are exempt from the
bill.
Senator Morrow spoke in opposition.? He said  that the bill is not about
relief.? Rather, it redistributes wealth and  should be changed to refund the
money to consumers.
Senator Battin spoke in opposition.? He cited  the planned Intergent plant in
North Palm Springs.? THis bill does not  solve the crisis.? It just
discourages generators from building in this  state.
Senator Dunn said that emergency steps must be  taken and that he supports
this bill.? Otherwise, CA's wealth will go out  of the state, primarily to
Texas.
Senator Polanco spoke in support and said that  ratepayers are being gouged.?
Billions in profits have been reaped by  generators.
Senator McClintock spoke in opposition and said  that power plants are not
being built here and that this bill will stop the  construction of plants in
CA.
Senator Peace spoke in support and said that FERC  has failed to enforce the
law.
Senator Perata spoke in support and said that  generators have gotten caught
red-handed and now need to pay a  penalty.
Senator Haynes spoke in opposition and said that  the constitution will be
violated by this bill and that companies will sell to  other states, rather
than California.

Senator Bowen spoke in support of the bill.?  She asked why we should have
the welcome mat our to CA when these companies are  charging 300% more in
their prices then just a year or two ago.? She also  indicated that the
Legislative Counsel has given them an opinion that this bill  is
constitutional because it only applies to the electrons flowing into the
state.? Whatever that means?
No Republicans voted for the bill.? No Democrats voted against  it.? FInal
vote was 25-12.
However, if the Assembly or Senate adjourns the Special Session without
passing this bill and/or AB 128x, then both measures will die.

Chris  Micheli, Esq.
Carpenter Snodgrass & Associates
1201 K Street, Suite  710
Sacramento, CA? 95814
(916) 447-2251
FAX: (916)  445-5624
EMAIL: cmicheli@carpentersnodgrass.com


Tom:

Just wanted to drop you a line to let you know that I am again an employee of UBS.  As I am sure you are aware, we are in process of transition from Enron to UBS.  I recently filled out all the appropriate paperwork to complete the transition.  From what I understand we are going to be a part of the trading arm of UBS Warbug.  This should be very exciting.  Maybe one day I will have the opportunity to trade stocks, bonds, or some other financial product if power ever becomes old hat.

Furthermore, I have will soon receive a signing bonus and a raise, so I intend on funding my IRA and my wife's IRA for 2001 and maybe even 2002.  If it wouldn't be too much trouble, I would like to know what the contribution levels are for 2002.  I think I saw something that changed them and the income levels one can have for a Roth.

As for Molly, the advertising business seems to be picking up for 2002.  She opened enough new business in the fourth quarter of 2001 to meet her goals and is on her way to making it the first quarter as well.  I think she is really beginning to understand her business.

Anyway, I currently have lots of time to myself since we are not trading, so maybe we can have lunch sometime.  If that is not possible, no big deal, I know that you are extremely busy.

I hope all is well with you and your family.

Sincerely,

Bert


Thanks.  Equistar is complete.

Daren J Farmer
01/29/2001 04:42 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Equistar feb - 01

That will be fine.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/29/2001 04:17 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Equistar feb - 01

I think I found the deal.  Deal # 157572 has meter 1372 attached to it.  It
should be meter 1373.  The 10.000 is split between two meters, but all should
be at meter 1373.  Can I change it?

AL

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 04:07
PM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   01/29/2001 03:59 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Equistar feb - 01

Daren - here are the Equistar #'s.  There should be a total of 65.000.  There
is  a new deal per Janice at Equistar at meter 1373 effective 2/01.  I have
not seen a deal for this.  Let me know if it is legitimate.  No volumes were
added, just moved from meter to meter.  (Deal # 378904)  Thanks.

AL


Clint,

Per our discussions, we need to agree to some modifications to the
confirmation this week in order to proceed with the roll.

These modifications involve making sure we can receive the cash due to us if
you net share settle, and should not impact your accounting for the
transactions.   This clauses are standard - I'm not sure how they got
dropped from the confirmation.

Here is a blackline version of the confirm: <<Enron confirm blackline
9-26-01.doc>>

Best regards,

Russell F. Hackmann, CFA
Lehman Brothers Corporate Equity Derivatives
(201) 524-2279 phone
(917) 854-2147 cell
(914) 833-0432 home

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without notice.

 - Enron confirm blackline 9-26-01.doc


there was a school shooting in new orleans


Guys, we appreciate your efforts on this project but we will not be needing
your services as owners engineer on the Vitro project.  I will honor our
agreement on the sell down; however, we have sufficient technical talent
internally and externally to manage this job.  I see very little effort in
continuing to waste internal time in ENA and EECC on this discussion.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000
01:26 PM ---------------------------

	Enron de Mexico

	From:  Max Yzaguirre @ ENRON                           08/18/2000 12:58 PM

To: Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert P Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vitro Project

Steve and Bob:

I know that John Normand told you yesterday that he had sign-off up his chain
of command on the deal you negotiated with him.  However, Dick apparently
does not agree with John or has had second thoughts.  Please review the
attached memo and let's discuss next steps.  It would also be helpful if one
of you would get a download from John as to the reason behind this change in
position.

Best regards - Max

Note to Dave:  I suggest that Steve, Bob and I take this up with Dick before
involving you.  This is a 180 degree turn from what we had been discussing
with Dick, John Normand and the rest of their team.  Dick and I were supposed
to have a 1 pm video call today to confirm the deal that had been worked out,
but he cancelled the call when he sent his e-mail to me.  We'll figure out
what's up and keep you posted./ Max

---------------------- Forwarded by Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron on 08/18/2000
12:42 PM ---------------------------
From: Dick Westfahl@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/18/2000 12:27 PM
To: Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Vitro Project


Here is a draft version of the FPL presentation.


Lee,

I've forwarded your email to Eric, and have asked for his response.  The
changes were his.

Thanks,

Kay

ps  Thanks for the invite Friday.  We had a great time.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Franklin, Warrick
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Thomas, Paul D.
Subject:	NE HRLY DEALS 10/15 THRU 10/19

Paul,

Attached is a spreadsheet with the deals for HRLY NE for 10-15 thru 10-19.  It appears that most of the deals are financial deals done at R1E (Westhub), R1C (NY West), and R1B (Nepool).  These deals all have financial true-ups that come through in the financial liquidations line on your P&L.  I have tried to break the liquidations values down deal by deal.  When looking at the deals, please note that the liquidation amounts are the opposite value that they appear on the spreadsheet.  For instance, looking in the highlighted yellow column, the value should be the opposite value shown.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks

Warrick Franklin
Phone#  713-345-4619
Location:  EB3101D
warrick.franklin@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000
10:36 AM ---------------------------

"FT.com" <ft.com.specials@newsbyemail.ft.com> on 08/07/2000 05:48:50 AM
To: "FT.com Users":;
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: FT.com monthly update

---------------------------------------------------------
Cowes Week sponsor Skandia Life is donating a pound every
time an FT.com user completes our ftbreak quiz.  The John
Merricks Trust for Sailors is the beneficiary - and it's an
easy way to give.  Sail through the quiz at:
http://timeoff.ft.com/timeoff/sports
---------------------------------------------------------

     This month's contents
     ---------------------
     1. New MBA
     2. More from the Global Archive
     3. Just askFT
     4. Good news for Personal Office users
     5. People on the Move
     6. Try FT.com's new Wap

1. Career development
---------------------------------------------------------
Looking to take an MBA, or online business course? FT.com's
new business education section includes:

*    A guide to choosing, preparing, financing
     and applying for global MBA programmes
*    Online application forms for top business schools
*    A quick learning centre with over 20 online courses

http://registration.ft.com/CareerAdvisor/MBARankings/reception.htm

2. What the papers say...
---------------------------------------------------------
Global Archive, FT.com's unrivalled free news library now
offers even more coverage from the world's leading news
sources.  Recent additions include: Sunday Business, Agence
Europe, World News Connection and Russia Portfolio.  These
join the Financial Times and over 3,000 other publications.
http://www.globalarchive.ft.com

3. askFT for your own personal researcher
---------------------------------------------------------
Need your own research department?  askFT is a new service
which uses a combination of premium content and skilled
research professionals to obtain tailored business information.
How can askFT help with your research? Find out here:
http://search.ft.com/Search/askFT

4. New home for Personal Office
---------------------------------------------------------
Now picking up your e-mails, files, to do list and calendar
through FT.com's Personal Office is even easier. We have
created an individual home page for this service allowing
you to bookmark this page for immediate access:
http://www.ft.com/personaloffice

5. Who said summer was a time for rest and relaxation?
---------------------------------------------------------
This summer there are an ever increasing number of announcements
about CEO's stepping down, moving on and dropping out.  Keep up
with what's going on:
http://people.ft.com/people

6. Try out FT.com's new Wap service from your PC
---------------------------------------------------------
Wap may be the wireless word of the moment, but how will
you tell when it's time for you to upgrade your mobile?
Try FT.com's Wap site on a virtual Wap phone and see how
easy accessing FT.com's news and global archive can be
when you're on the move:
http://www.ft.com/mobile

P.S. For details of the six lucky winners to scoop five
thousand pounds worth of wine in last month's wine quiz visit:
http://timeoff.ft.com/timeoff

---------------------------------------------------------

Why not forward this e-mail to a friend or colleague who
may find this information useful?

If you no longer wish to receive further e-mails from FT.com,
please send an e-mail to: ft.com.unsubscribe@newsbyemail.ft.com
with the single word "unsubscribe" as the subject of the message.
Your name will then be removed from our mailing list.

If you have forgotten your password for FT.com, please visit:
http://registration.ft.com/registration/passwordLookup.jsp


This request has been pending approval for  3 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081005&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081005
Approver            : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Request Create Date : 1/15/02 1:04:06 PM
Requested For       : naveen.andrews@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


Where are we on decisions on promotions?  Last time I asked, it was under consideration.  Kevin has a good idea here.  Can you give us an update?  Thanks.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sweeney, Kevin
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 9:53 AM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	Promotions

Sally,

Someone brought up an interesting idea that might help motivate people and retain them.  Recognizing that we are constrained from a cash perspective, does it make any sense to still promote some people who deserve it so that at least they get recognition in terms of title and recognition by their peers, however have their salary remain the same?

Just a thought.

Kevin


Dear Sir,

Just touching base to see if there was any news...

Thanks!
Vikram


NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: DAVE KEARNS
on NOVELL NETWARE
05/31/01 - Today's focus: Send Novell your support

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* Novell's poor financials cuts deep into company
* Links related to Novell NetWare
* Featured reader resource

_______________________________________________________________
NEWS ALERTS NOW AVAILABLE FROM NETWORK WORLD!
You have very specific information needs about a technology or
technology vendor and you  subscribe to a newsletter or go on-
line to find out about the strategic developments in this
specific area. But how do you stay up with the late-breaking
news? Network World now offers six very focused News Alerts to
keep you abreast of the most significant developments of the
week on LANs, Storage, Network/Systems Management, The Edge,
Cisco and Microsoft. As an added service, if there's impactful,
late-breaking news about one of these specific technologies or
vendors, by subscribing to our News Alerts, we'll let you know
what it is within hours. Subscribe today at
http://nww1.com/go/ad082.html
_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: Send Novell your support

By Dave Kearns

Gathering information about Novell's changes in the aftermath of its
recently announced poor second quarter financial results, was like
covering a war zone. E-mails and phone messages kept coming in from
'the front' - other journalists, Novell employees, recent
ex-employees, as well as interested bystanders such as company
stockholders, spouses and significant others.

First there were reports that all Novell employees in San Jose were
fired and the buildings sold. But some reflection showed that CEO
Eric Schmidt and CFO Dennis Rainey were a) still with the company and
b) still in San Jose, so that wasn't true.

Then there were reports that "hit men" were spotted flying out of
Salt Lake City to Novell offices worldwide with orders to close them
down. I even heard that the entire NetWare development team was let
go.

As it turned out, none of those reports was completely true, or
completely false. The workforce at San Jose was cut back
dramatically, but the office is still there. NetWare's product team
is still intact, although the Border Manager team was heavily cut.
Some non-U.S. offices, in the Pacific region for example, were hit
hard, while Europe suffered little or no personnel loss. It does
appear, though, that the on-again, off-again, back-on-again DigitalMe
initiative is off for good.

Besides the folks who were shown the door last week, there are others
who have been given notice that they will be laid off in either four
weeks' or six months' time, as projects and contracts are wrapped up.
The dust has yet to settle.

But while it was exhilarating to watch at the time, on reflection
it's rather sad. Some people with whom I should have spoken to more
often to tell them how much I appreciated their work are now gone.

This is a good time for you to talk to the people you rely on at
Novell for information, product and support. Let them know how much
you depend on them. Find out who their manager is and send out
letters or e-mails of commendation. Let Novell's management know
where your priorities lie, name the people who have supported you
best and what you expect from the company you've been loyal to all
these years.

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Dave Kearns:

Dave Kearns is the Word Wrangler for Virtual Quill, a writing
agency serving the computer and networking industries. If
your target customer doesn't know your product, doesn't know
its uses and doesn't know he needs it, he's not going to buy
it. From books to reviews, marketing to manuals, VQ can help
you and your business. Virtual Quill - "words to sell by..."
Find out more at: http://www.vquill.com/, or by e-mail at
mailto:info@vquill.com.
_______________________________________________________________
RELATED EDITORIAL LINKS

Novell posts Q2 loss, plans layoffs -  Computerworld, 05/23/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0523novelloff.html

Novell caching spinoff no cash cow -  Network World, 05/21/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0521volera.html

Novell spinoff lays off 10% of workforce  -  Computerworld, 05/24/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0524novellspin.html

Breaking Novell and NetWare news, updated daily:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/financial/novell.html

Archive of the Novell NetWare newsletter:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/netware/index.html
______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

User Excellence Award

If you've completed an interesting network project in the last
12 to 18 months, here's your chance to gain industry
recognition for it. Network World is currently accepting
nominations for its annual User Excellence Award. For more
information and an online nomination form, go to
http://www.nwfusion.com/nw/awards.html#excellence
Deadline for submission is June 11.
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Fusion Sales
Manager, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2001

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


PROCESSING

25841	PG&E		Eff 2/2-2/28/02	39,200/d	Swap RP Vol		Processing

26511	PG&E		Eff 2/2-2/28/02	21,000/d	Swap RP Vol		Processing

TENDERED

24198	Richardson	Eff 1/23/02		35,714/d	Add Blk #16		Tendered 1/22

25374	Oneok		Ext to 2/28/02	12,500/d	Panhdle to Beaver	EXECUTED

26758	Duke		Eff 1/30/02		40,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

26758	Duke		Eff 2/02		40,000/d	Swap RP Vol		Tendered 1/31

26819	Reliant	Eff 2/02		10,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27342	Sempra		Eff 2/02		30,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27352	Sempra		Eff 2/02		21,500/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27377	Agave		Ext to 3/31/02	10,000/d	Pecos to W. Ward	Tendered 1/24

27377	Agave		Eff 2/02		10,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27420	WTG		Eff 2/02 Only		2,700/d	Panhdle to Winkler	EXECUTED

27496	Reliant	Ext to 2/28/02	30,000/d	San Juan to Blmfld	EXECUTED

27723	Wasatch	Eff 3/02		1,200/d	Increase MDQ		Tendered 1/30

27803	BP		1/1/03-12/31/04	25,000/d	Blmfld to Needles	Tendered 1/28

27813	Sempra		2/1/02-2/28/02	15,000/d	Blmfld to Topock	EXECUTED

27819	PG&E		2/1/02-10/31/02	20,000/d	Blmfld to Calif	EXECUTED

27821	Cinergy	2/1-2/28/02		5,000/d	Cen Pool to Topock	Tendered 1/29


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/19/2001>, published as of 10/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


The use of Enron's name is OK as long as it is limited to that.

SHoward@milbank.com on 02/29/2000 05:23:38 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Inclusion of Enron on Client List

Richard:

We are currently preparing a marketing piece on Milbank's los Angeles
litigation practice.  Is it okay if we include Enron in a list of
"Representative Clients" that will appear in the peice?

Steve

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - att1.htm


See redlined added language which allows reasonable time to manage the closeout process--tracks general ISDA mechanism.  The attached forms have the added language.

(b) Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of a Default in respect of any Defaulting Party, Non-defaulting Group may give notice to Defaulting Group specifying the relevant Default, declaring Defaulting Group in default of all Underlying Master Agreements and all Transactions thereunder, and designating a date not earlier than the date such notice is effective, but not later than 20 days after such notice is effective, upon which date each Non-defaulting Party shall (i) accelerate, terminate, and liquidate, or otherwise close-out all Transactions under its Underlying Master Agreements as of such designated date or as soon as reasonably practicable following such designated date; (ii) exercise rights of setoff, netting, and/or recoupment in accordance with the terms of its Underlying Master Agreements; (iii) retain any Collateral; (iv) with respect to each Defaulting Party, withhold payment and performance of each Non-defaulting Party's Obligations to each Defaulting Party to pay, secure, setoff against, net, and/or recoup such Defaulting Party's Obligations to such Non-defaulting Party; (v) convert any Obligation from one currency into another currency as set forth in Section 5; and (vi) take any other action permitted by law or in equity or by its Underlying Master Agreements or any Transactions thereunder necessary or appropriate to protect, preserve, or enforce its rights or to reduce any risk of loss or delay.  This Section 2(b) shall be referred to herein as the "Underlying Master Agreements Close-Out."

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732
(713) 646-3393 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Hey Guys,  I just typed a small novel (below) about JRTC and thought I send
it out, it's answerin a question a friend asked about how the simulated
comabt stuff works and has an example at the end.

Excellent question (about what makes the bad guys run away during an
exercise).

The Army paid Grumman a shitload of cash to make "laser tag" stuff for us.

It's called MILES and if you ever see a picture of an army unit on an
exercise you will see that the soldier is wearing a harness over his normal
Load Bearing Vest(LBV), the harness has four receptors on the front and four
on the back, in addition there is a doughnut shaped belt of receptors that
goes on the kevlar helmet.  Vehicles also have receptors mounted to them,
every thing from HMMV's to the tanks to the helicopters.

Our weapons systems have transmitters on them, it'll look like a little box
mounted on the front of the weapon, the box has a pressure sensor so every
time the gas from a blank round firing hits it it fires a laser beam down
range.  If the laser beam strikes a receptor the guys harness will emit this
God awful high pitched whine that lets everyone know he is down/dead.
AT-4's and Dragons (bazooka like anti-armor weapons) are simulated by what
are called Vipers, same weight, same size, except it fires a big powerful
laser that will be strong enough to activate an enemy tanks MILES.  The
armor vehicles MILES game is pretty neat.  There are two types of kills on a
tank, a Mobility kill, and a critical kill.  If the Viper or other weapon
doesn't have a solid hit on a sensor in a critical area, a mobility kill
will result which means the explosion just blew the trak of the vehicle but
its' radios and weapons still work.  A critical kill means, the vehicle and
all inside are dead dead dead.  If a tank gets a critical kill the MILES
gear will actually shut the vehicle down and kill its radios.  The guy will
just be drivin along and then he will hear over his radio a females voice
say, "Critical kill" and the only thing that will work on the vehicle after
that are the brakes.

So, direct fire weapons systems are pretty easy to replicate, target wears a
receptor, shooter fires a transmitter.

Indirect fire weapons though are a bit more difficult,  whereas before the
shooter always had eyes on the target and thus could directly place a laser
beam on target, artillery often shoots targets that no one directly see.

There are two ways around this.   At the National Training Center (NTC)
where they do all the armor against armor training, they have the MILES 2000
system.  You have an armored motorized rifle company(MRC) sitting at point
X,  I have an observer 15Km away who, with optics can see your
MRC, my FO calls in a fire mission, based on the target description a Bn 3
will be fired (54 rounds fired in 3 volleys as there are only 18 tubes in a
Bn.  The Observer-Controllers (OCs), kinna like referees, will monitor the
Call for Fire from the observer to the tubes, and the OCs will take the fire
mission data and plug it into their big MILES computer which will take into
account any errors the observer may have made and any errors the gun
batteries (instead of Artillery Companies we have artillery Batteries (6
guns)) may have made.  When the gun batteries tell the observer that they
have pulled the trigger, the OCs, who are always listening, will pull the
Miles trigger.  What happens then is a satellite hovering above NTC will
blast down a laser with a footprint large enough to simulate the area 18
artillery rounds would take up, it will do this 3 times to simulate all 3
volleys landing.  Any vehicles caught in this footprint will be assessed as
damaged/destroyed.

At JRTC where the Light Fighters (i.e. no armor assets organic to them)
learn to play,  we don't get no stinkin satellites.  What we do there is,
when a fire mission is called to the guns, the OCs will monitor it and enter
the data in their computers, the computer will take into account any errors
made by the FO and the guns and will spit out a grid coordinate,  this grid
will be passed to a "Fire Marker" which is a crazy guy with a four wheeler,
a GPS, and a god gun (a hand held transmitter that fires a universal kill
laser i.e. men to tanks and aircraft).  I say crazy because these guys are
civilians who get bonuses based on how fast they can get to the target grid.
  Their average response time is 4 1/2 minutes, which is about 3 minutes
longer then it would be in real life so it's not as cool as MILES 2000.  So
you'll see these guys haulin ass through the woods on theses 4 wheelers
tryin to get to their target grids on time, and God help you if he pulls up
into your position and no you can't haul ass if you see one comin your way
cause your OC who is walkin with your unit will zap you on the spot if he
sees you runnin from a fire marker.  I'll close this bad boy with a little
story.

"Oh shit, there I was" (all good 'war' stories gotta start with this).
We had started the first phase of the rotation, "Entry into the Box" (the
box is the JRTC engagement area) at 2300hrs the previous night and had
fought our way 7 Km SW hand railing a road, identifying mine/wire obstacles
and eliminating the Observers over watching them.  It was 0800 the next
morning and we were dead f-kin tired and had finally reached our main
objective which was a road inter-section in a semi wooded area just to the
south of the main air field that the rest of the Brigade Combat Team (BCT)
was gonna use to lift in the rest of the support assets.  There was a BIG
triangular berm area just off the road, basically the dirt walls were 10 ft
tall 50 yard long.  We moved out of the tree line and occupied it cause at
the time it looked like it would be super easy to defend, which was good
cause we needed to hole up for a bit and catch out breath, plus our COLT
team (Combat Observer Laser Team = mounted (on a HMMVV) FO's with Laser
designators to guide Copperheads and Hellfire missiles, basically vehicle
killers) and Bradley support vehicles had just 'discovered' (BOOM) a mine
field at the intersection, this was happening as we were occupying the berm.
  So we detached a small element to go evac the Casualties from the
vehicles, the 1SG and a couple of joes. 3 min later the 1SG and his team
were nailed by anti-personnel mines surrounding the mine field while trying
to aid the wounded inside the vehicles.  At the same time a "Civilian" truck
with two redneck lookin females showed up like they were fixin to drive
right on through the road so we had to send a few guys out of the berm to
stop/search the vehicle (at JRTC they employ real civilian actors to portray
Civilians on the Battlefield or COBs, because in real life there are COBs
and we gotta know how to deal with them and accomplish our mission at the
same time).  So we got the 1SG and a couple of guys down at the obstacle, a
COB truck right outside the berm when the CO decides to go check on the
obstacle.  By this time we had been in this BIG berm (read TRP (Target
Reference Point or somethin the enemy probably has his guns laid on just
waitin for some morons to park their sad tired asses in there long enough to
get a mission off)) for like 15 minutes when sure enough off in the distance
we hear this vrrrrrm getting steadily louder and louder.  We were so tired
we were basically denying the obvious, "there's no way he's headed for us,
please God don't let him be headed for us" basically you had an entire
company in a 100 yard radius which is about the same size as a 82mm mortar
impact area.  So there we are listening to this 4 wheeler get closer and
closer and basically all we can do is start to get all our gear back on and
get ready to HAUL ass.  Of course we can't legally run until the first round
impacts.  So this guys comes tearin down the road, shoots off the road and
pulls SMACK DAB into the middle of the berm, jumps off his bike and starts
UNLOADING with air burst Arty Simulators (basically a little flare gun that
pops 1/4 sticks of TNT up 40 ft into the air to simulate incoming rounds.
Note: these are only used when the grid is so accurate that using ground
burst simulators would pose a hazard to troops).  Basically what this told
us is that we were setup, the baddies were just waitin for us cause the
rounds were accurate on the first volley and needed no adjustment.  So yeah,
this joker is poppin off airburst TNT, after the first burst I yelled
INCOMING and got up and hauled ASS.  Luckily I was close to the exit and
started movin out FAST, because between airbursts the Fire Marker was just
sweeping left to right with the God gun as guys were scramblin tryin to get
out.  I got out of the Berm and just kept runnin a good 200M because I'm
Artillery and I know what the burst radius is on these suckers.  I looked
back and saw the Infantry guys stoppin at a tree just outside the berm.
Since there were no visible Real life ground bursts they thought they were
safe.  As I was yellin at them to keep movin an OC came out and just whacked
em all (16 guys).  As the rest of the people who made it out were still
runnin, about 25 of us and we were all now 150-200M North of the berm,
scattered all over hell.  Little bunches of 5-6 guys runnin to trees and
collapsing.  Just as the last of the living made it out of the berm, we hear
this vehicle come tearing outta the trees about 50M to our left and from
lower ground.  Sure enough it's a DsHKA (read Dishka, basically a 50 Cal on
a friggin truck bed),  so there this fucker is lighting us up from the left
and enemy 82mm Mortar fire blastin our tail ends.  Since the DsHKA was a
high payoff TGT I was immediately on my net sreamin "Holy Shit we got a
DsHKA here, Grid 785436 HELLLLPPPP!!!"  At the same time we got Infantry
guys tryin to suppress the joker on the back of truck with their M4's while
trying to get two Vipers together (we were told by the OC's that the only
thing they've ever seen kill vehicle here with was two Vipers fired at the
same section of the vehicle at exactly the same time)  but the Viper teams
were scattered all over hell.  All this happened within about 30 seconds,
the CO had seen us come tearin outta the Berm and heard the DsHKA light up
so he was on his net talkin to the Kiowa's (scout helicopters but they're
armed).  So we're pinned down, trying to suppress this truck while dodgin 50
Cal laser blasts (since its just MILES a blade of grass can deflect the
laser).  FINALLY the Kiowas show up (actually they got there respectably
fast only 2-3 minutes) chase the bastard down and smash him with their
hellfires.  With 30 of 65 guys dead, and one DsHKA down, we were ready to
get a little rest and then start huntin the mortar and other 2 DsHKAs that
were supposed to be in the area.

Basically we got the shit ambushed outta us, it was really a pretty nice
setup on the enemies part.  We were stupid enough to setup in an obvious
terrain feature, one that was no doubt on the Enemy's target lists.  So when
the mortar rounds started droppin and we started pouring out of the berm
there the 50 cal was waitin to mow down whoever didn't get killed by the
Arty.

Anyways, that's one of my JRTC stories and subsequently one of the largest
e-mails I've ever written. So I'm gonna forward it to the rest of the guys.

Welp, its about time to go get my drink on, talk to y'all later.

LAWLER,OUT.

 >Hell, I thought Consultants had a lotta acronyms.....Hey when you guys go
>through these exercises, what makes someone high tail out of an attack
>stance...i.e. I know you're not firing live rounds at one another, so how
>do they simulate real life scenarios?  Also, in concerns with deer hunting,
>I'll be headed down to Junction (our lease) to pull a trophy this weekend.
>I'll probably freeze my ass off, but I've had my deer picked out since
>Sept.  Later.
>
>Dickey
>
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the
>use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
>authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged
>information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified
>that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance
>on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
>unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
>us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
>system. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young is neither liable for the proper and
>complete transmission of the information contained in this communication
>nor for any delay in its receipt.
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


HoustonStreet Weaves New Round of Investments And Strategic Partnerships
Into Its `web for the Web'

03/23/2000
Business Wire
(Copyright (c) 2000, Business Wire)

  PORTSMOUTH, N.H.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 23, 2000--

  Thomas H. Lee Company, Sapient, Bowstreet and others bring financial,
marketing and B2B Internet savvy to Web-based wholesale
  energy exchange

  Taking another step toward becoming the Internet-based energy trading
leader, HoustonStreet Exchange today announced a new round of investments and
strategic relationships with key experts. Thomas H. Lee Company, Sapient and
Bowstreet have all joined HoustonStreet's web for the Web, a virtual network
of business and technology companies that support HoustonStreet's delivery of
wholesale energy trading platforms.

  HoustonStreet established the web for the Web business model as a
rapid-development network of strategic partnerships with companies that have
expertise in disparate fields, rather than building its own departments
in-house. Leveraging the core competencies of its key partners, HoustonStreet
is able to execute quickly and effectively in a rapidly changing environment.
After helping HoustonStreet launch its company and its wholesale power trading
exchange, HoustonStreet.com, these businesses are now helping the company
improve the exchange and expand it aggressively into additional markets.

  Thomas H. Lee Company, one of the oldest, largest and most successful
private equity investment firms in the country with more than $6 billion in
total capital under management, will provide HoustonStreet with important
financial advisement and significant contacts to help the company expand.

  "HoustonStreet has a great Internet exchange platform and stands alone in
its ability to give energy traders the information they need within an
easy-to-use, fluid trading environment," said Tom Hagerty, managing director
at Thomas H. Lee Company. "We believe online energy trading will grow
dramatically in the months and years ahead, and HoustonStreet is well
positioned to seize this opportunity."

  In addition to Thomas H. Lee Company, leading technology companies Sapient
and Bowstreet, private equity investment firms Omega Advisors, Inc. and
Elliott Associates, L.P., and principals from MicroArts Corporation
participated in this round of financing. Sapient, Bowstreet and MicroArts all
play integral roles in HoustonStreet's Web-driven business model, and will
continue to help the company respond to market demand in Internet time.
HoustonStreet Exchange relied on Sapient's strategic and systems integration
experience to design and build the site. MicroArts developed the user
interface, interactive marketing Web site, and marketing plan for the site's
launch. Bowstreet is working with HoustonStreet.com to develop the platform
for HoustonStreet to provide additional value-added services to its customers
and to link trading information directly to trading companies' mid- and
back-office systems using XML (Extensible Markup Language) technology. This
will allow risk managers to have a real-time view of trading activity.

  "These relationships demonstrate the strength of our web for the Web," said
HoustonStreet president and CEO Frank Getman. "We pride ourselves on working
with the best and brightest in their particular areas of expertise who share
our commitment to execution and success. Omega, Elliott and Thomas H. Lee
bring financial and Wall Street expertise, while Sapient, Bowstreet and
MicroArts provide us with the technology and marketing savvy that have given
us a leadership position in the market."

  About HoustonStreet Exchange

  Designed by traders for traders, HoustonStreet Exchange represents the first
Web portal for the trading of wholesale energy products. HoustonStreet.com
provides an online trading engine that allows traders to buy and sell their
energy products faster, more efficiently and more easily than they do today.
HoustonStreet Exchange is headquartered in Portsmouth, New Hampshire with
offices in Houston, Texas. HoustonStreet Exchange is a majority-owned
subsidiary of BayCorp Holdings, Ltd., (AMEX:MWH). For more information, visit
HoustonStreet at www.houstonstreet.com.

  About Thomas H. Lee Company

  Thomas H. Lee Company is one of the oldest and most successful private
equity investment firms in the United States. Since its founding in 1974,
Thomas H. Lee Company has invested more than $5 billion of total capital. The
firm's investment strategy has been consistently focused over its 25-year
history on growth companies with strong fundamentals.

  About Sapient

  Sapient (NASDAQ: SAPE) is a leading e-services consultancy providing
Internet strategy consulting and sophisticated Internet-based solutions to
Global 1000 companies and startup businesses. As Architects for the New
Economy, Sapient helps clients define their Internet strategies and design,
architect, develop and implement solutions to execute those strategies.
Founded in 1991, Sapient has been providing Internet solutions for over five
years and employs approximately 2,100 people in offices in Cambridge, Mass.,
the company's headquarters, as well as London, Sydney, Milan, New York, San
Francisco, Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas, Los Angeles, Washington D.C., Denver and
Houston. More information on Sapient can be found at www.sapient.com.

  About Bowstreet

  Bowstreet provides the XML infrastructure to automate the creation of
dynamic and customized B2B web marketplaces that enable new business models,
extend companies' market reach and generate new revenue. These "business webs"
link an infinite number of customers, suppliers and partners in minutes
instead of months and at a fraction of the cost of today's web development
methods. Founded in January 1998, Bowstreet was ranked as one of the top
e-commerce start-ups in the country at the Enterprise Outlook Conference, and
has raised $90 million from leading venture capital firms, global investment
banks and strategic corporate investors. For more information, visit
www.bowstreet.com or call 603-436-9100.

  About MicroArts

  Designers of technology brands since 1988, MicroArts Corporation focuses on
business-to-consumer and business-to-business e-commerce brand marketing,
including: brand strategy, identity design, user-experience design and
demand-generation campaigns. Employing both print and interactive media,
MicroArts has established brands that turn e-commerce start-ups into industry
leaders and repositioned traditional businesses as e-businesses. Clients
include: APC, Celarix, FitPlay.com, Hasbro Interactive, HoustonStreet.com, ICG
Commerce, I-many.com, iPhrase.com, PaperExchange.com, RedHat Software,
Send.com and traffic.com.

  About Elliott Associates, L.P.

  Elliott Associates, L.P., a New York hedge fund, and its offshore sister
fund, Westgate International Limited, represent one of the oldest and most
stable hedge fund groups. Elliott was formed in 1977 with $1 million of
capital, and Westgate was formed in late 1994 with $80 million of capital. The
two funds now have more than $1 billion of capital.

  About Omega Advisors, Inc.

  Omega Advisors, Inc. is an equity-oriented investment manager with more than
$2.5 billion in assets under management. In operation since 1992, Omega seeks
to invest in fundamentally attractive companies with superior financial and
business characteristics at attractive valuation levels.

  This press release contains forward-looking statements. There are a number
of important factors that could cause these forward-looking statements to be
materially inaccurate. These factors include, without limitation, that (i)
energy traders may be unwilling or unable to use Internet-based energy trading
systems, including HoustonStreet.com, (ii) HoustonStreet.com may not be able
to operate profitably, (iii) technological or systems outages could occur,
(iv) competitors with greater financial, marketing or other resources could
emerge, (v) performance is contingent upon successful completion of design and
implementation of the crude and refined products site, and (vi) market
acceptance of HoustonStreet.com cannot be predicted. HoustonStreet.com is a
registered service mark of HoustonStreet Exchange.

CONTACT: Beaupre & Co. Public Relations Inc.
             Christa Branscombe
             (603) 559-5804
             cbranscombe@beaupre.com
                  or
             HoustonStreet Exchange
             Kim Salem
             (603) 766-8703
             ksalem@houstonstreet.com

13:17 EST   MARCH 23, 2000

Folder Name: Rahil Jafry
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 78

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


I will out of the office Friday January 25th and Monday January 28th, if you need assistance please contact Terry Kowalke at ext. 36403.

John Buchanan


Tim always tells me EPMI's biggest problem about accessing transmission
with the ISO is the lack of public information.  Tim wants all ISO
information - as he says "more, better, faster."  In other words he wants:
meter and outage information, water levels, bids and schedules, actual
flows, transmission availability and congestion.

Making this information available is necessary for three reasons.  This
information would help the market to police itself and provide better price
signals producing a more efficient market.  It would remove competitive
advantages held by monopsony load servers and generators owning a large
percentage of the generation in the market.  It would also, as Sue points
out, remove the transmission availability knowledge advantage held by the
grandfathered transmission contract holders.

Susan J Mara@EES
09/08/2000 12:06 PM

To:   Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@ENRON
cc:   Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:  Re: ANSWERING YOUR QUESTIONS ON CA TRANSMISSION ACCESS  (Document
link: Mary Hain)

OK.  I'll take a shot in answering your questions, Steve. Others are free
to comment as well.

The transmission issues in the ISO are greatly lessened.  If you talk to
the traders, they LOVE it.  Before April1, 1998, they had no sales to CA.
Now, they have millions of dollars of sales.  Why?  -- no transmission
access to speak of before the ISO took over.

We still have some problems, however.  The problems have been there since
day one and FERC has punted on them.  We have a huge FERC case dealing with
many of them.  We also appealed a stupid FERC order on Path 15 probably at
least a year ago and have heard nothing from FERC on it. The traders have
also seriously considered a FERC complaint on Path 15.

So, what are the access issues?

Path 15 is the major constraint point between northern and southern CA.
Has been for years. The transmission fix is basically adding a third
intertie line between Tracy and Tesla. When I left PG&E in 1996, the
estimated coast was $300 million.  The congestion costs did not justify
building the line then.

PG&E continues to control Path 15 and tells the ISO what's left after PG&E
allocates the capacity and decides what the rating is and when it changes.
There is no transparency.  PG&E has the ability to use Path 15 to advantage
Diablo Canyon given the existing contracts.  Carl has looked into it
somewhat and doesn't think PG&E is, but;... The ISO says it can't interpret
PG&E's contracts with the munis and filed some funky thing with FERC about
how it's some kind of overseer -- we protested and have now appealed.  The
munis have been receiving preferential access since Day One -- their
contracts were generally subservient to the IOU rights -- more like
interruptible -- but once the ISO started, all of a sudden, the muni rights
became super firm superceding the IOU rights (as far as we can tell from
sketchy filings and discussions with ISO staff). That's why we have pushed
the issue.  Also, Dynegy and Power Exchange (not the PX) have rights on
Path 15.  Tim Belden would love to get some info on how that constaint is
being operated.

Information in general is pretty sketchy on real-time transmission.  We
have complained to the ISO about how the ISO knows what's going on in
transmission (as do the utilities), changes what it does, which then
changes prices, and then doesn't tell us until after the fact.  The ISO has
promised to do better, but I don't think has implemented any real changes
yet.

Advantageous access.

Except for what's going on in Path 15, I don't think the IOUs have any
advantages on access -- except with respect to Regulatory Must Run
resources like nuclear and hydro -- but I think it's resource specific,
rather than owner specific. The munis are another story.  See next item.

Munis Preference

This is a huge issue here and I assume across the country.  In making a
devil's bargain with the munis, the FERC has put the ISO into an untenable
situation.  The "sanctity of contracts" under any and all conditions has
created preference for incumbents (not the IOUs -- but everyone who had a
transmission contract with the IOUs) and poor rights for those poor
schlepps like us who have come into the new market.  The ISO cannot operate
the system this way and is forced to give the munis/Dynegy more than they
had originally and to let them do things no one else can do (e.g., some
munis get to change their schedule after the actrive hour begins, some get
to do it every half hour, so far most haven't had to pay for ancillary
services, etc.)

There are many, many examples of how we are discriminated against (in
addition to Path 15) and of how FERC has shined us on -- but yet we fight
on. The most recent muni giveaway is the litigation surrounding the "new"
transmission charge for CA -- into this has been entangled the rules for
munis joining the ISO.  The munis want huge handouts to join. And part of
the "new" T rate includes hundreds of millions of subsidies for munis --
I've pointed out that this amounts to the IOU's customers paying for the
munis' stranded transmission costs, when they are already paying for the
IOUs' stranded generation costs, but this argument fell on deaf ears in the
ISO.  It's really not our issue, but it does make you kind of sick about
where public policy stands in this state.

Feel free to call (415) 782-7802

Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 07:43 AM

Sent by:  Steven J Kean@ENRON

To:   Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:

When we have described the problems and solutions for California we have
focussed on generation siting and flexibility to hedge.  We have stayed
away from transmission issues on the assumption that California, with its
ISO and PX, does not suffer from the same discrimination issues as other
parts of the country.  Is this true?  Does California's system layer in
priorities for utility use of the system -- eg doesn't PG&E control "path
15"?  Does that control provide advantageous access to PG&E?  Are there
other examples and are there links between these "preferences" and the
current problems in California?  As we are trying to convert reliability
and pricing concerns into FERC action these would be helpful arguments to
have available to us.


Thanks for the info on your trip.  Have a great time -- I will be anxious to
hear about the presentation in Natchez.  Love, Sally

SueW2@aol.com on 06/07/2000 10:29:03 AM
To: cwhite@viviance.com, sally.beck@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Trip plans

Hi Cindy and Sally,

Before I forget here are the phone numbers where we can be reached for the
next several days:

June 8th and 10th La Quinta in Alexandria, LA 318 442 3700

June 9th Monmouth Plantation Nachez 1-800-828-4531

We will be in Natchez until later in the afternoon on the 10th.

Mom


Happy Holidays Ya'll !!!!!!!!!!
The Johnstons

PS Maggies picture to follow this email


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Ramsower, Valerie
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:38 PM
To:	Schneider, Bryce
Subject:	NYISO revised

Bryce,

Here is the new version of the NYISO application.  Let me know if there are any problems or if there are any additional changes required.

Thanks,
Valerie Ramsower