Attached please find the Natural Gas market analysis for today.

Thanks,

Bob McKinney

 - 10-12-01 Nat Gas.doc


I have been out of the country for the last week, but am in today. I am available anytime this AM.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	KHAJWeg@aol.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-KHAJWeg+40aol+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 03, 2001 7:16 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Cc:	hweg@pgwlaw.com
Subject:	Official Participants Committee and Unofficial Energy Sellers Committee

Richard, please call me so we can discuss directly the question of
arbitration against SCE for the PX claim of $824 million.  I think its
important and I would like to discuss it with you personally.
Second, I am representing Enron's sub, Portland General Electric Company, on
the Unofficial Committee of Energy Sellers that has about 20 members.  12 of
the members have voted to send a low key, non threatening message to the
Calif legislature on the pending AB78X to the effect that if they pass a bill
that leaves SCE $1 bill short in financing, then other energy sellers (you
and I know or can guess who they are) will probably feel forced to start an
involuntary bankruptcy or to start litigation against SCE.  The Unofficial
Committee was formed to not threaten or pursue bankruptcy or litigation, but
to pursue consensual repayment.  By creating a cloud of uncertainty over
whether and when others will start the involuntary bankruptcy, the rating
agencies and underwriters may not be willing to financing SCE even at the
reduced rate set forth in the proposed bill.  The 12 members of the
Unofficial Committee that want to send this message want SCE to avoid a
Bankruptcy and therefore are suggesting that the Legislature, if it passes AB
78X, may actually be making it more likely that a BK will ensue.
Apparently, Doug Nichols at Portland General talked to Lisa Mellencamp about
this and was told that Portland General should not be part of this low key,
non threatening message.
I would like to talk to you directly about this too.  I want to make sure
that Enron is not missing several opportunities here that will help Enron and
others.  Please give me a call sometime.  I will be in Sacramento on Tues Sep
4, but will call you when and where you say.
I asked Nelson to find out if you would be around to actively participate on
a subcommittee of the Official Committee on SCE (Sempra and Powerex would be
the other subcommittee members).  Last time I put you on  a subcommittee, on
fees, you were too busy to participate.  Please let me know if you really can
be involved on this important subcommittee on SCE.
thanks.


You crack me up...I absolutely loved the trading analogy (at times your
insight is frighteningly dead on).

Don't worry about me though.  I will be patient and remain optimistic,
despite let downs.  And, in no way, shape or form will I settle and end up
with some dush.  You would have been proud of me though, for the first time I
was really able to let down a lot of those walls and be a little more
vulnerable.

I'm thrilled things are going so well with Shannon.  I think your attitude
about the whole situation is extremely healthy and mature (it amazing what
happens when you care more about the other person than yourself).

Talk to you soon,

Susan

* Be sure and let me know next time you're coming to Houston.  We'll go grab
a drink and have a good talk.


Hi Everyone:

MEETING ROOM CHANGE:
The Employee Relations Council will meet in EB1629 - Monday, October 29, 11:00-12:00.  This change is for this meeting only, all other meetings are scheduled in EB16C1.

Thanks,

Hilda Bourgeois-Galloway, CPS
Enron - HR & Community Relations
hbourge@enron.com
713/345-6805


FYI.

	Tim Belden@ECT
	10/17/2000 07:40 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ENA Successful in ISO Auction

ENA also sold 100 MW of peak power (6x16) to PG&E for 5 years beginning in
January of 2001 delivered in NP15.  They declined our offer for flat (7x24)
power delivered in NP15 of $50.90/MWh.  The trade press is claiming that they
purchased 400 MW from Calpine delivered in the new Greater Bay Area zone for
around $51/MWh.  I believe that these values are lower than the current
generation component of PG&E's frozen rates.

PG&E procured these MW's through a traditional rfp.  This is a pretty clean
bilateral deal done outside of the PX.  We papered the deal using the EEI
master agreement.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 10/16/2000 07:54 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: skean@enronl.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: ENA Successful in ISO Auction

In case word hasn't gotten around, ENA learned COB Friday, that it has been
chosen to engage in further negotiations with the ISO for about 450 MWs of
projects.  The preliminary award is based on ENA's response to the RFQ that
the ISO issued last month for "emergency resources."


Kim:  Read this over and give me a call.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2001
06:05 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  CoganJA@aol.com                           03/29/2001 11:49 PM

To: sbreen@czn.com, cfoster@enron.com
cc:
Subject: PPL Proposal

Gentlemen,

I tried to reach both of you late in the evening, but was unsuccessful.  I
will be traveling starting at 7 am Las Vegas time back to NO.  I have a brief
layover in Phoenix and will try to contact you.

Initial reaction to our proposal during the day was that it looked pretty
good.  This I got from Terry Crupi.  At that time Terry had not seen the
proposal, but was relaying what he had gotten from Barbara Veety back in
Allentown. In the early evening I met with John Baileys, Terry Crupi, and Joe
Cammarano of PPL.  At that meeting they expressed concern for the reservation
charge and floor, especially since the Citizens' TW contract has no
alternative market.  I asked if a cap would help ease their concerns and they
said that they did not think so.  They are really struggling with the
reservation charge as we have currently proposed it.  They agree that we
should at a minimum recover all of our fixed pipeline fees in a reservation
charge.  We did not have a chance to get into discussions about other
potential cost that would be appropriately placed in the reservation charge.

They would prefer a pure index based deal and could agree to a load factor of
about 80%, but indicated that they could live with some monthly reservation
fee based upon the monthly index, but we did not get into much detail on
exactly how that would work.

Perhaps the biggest issue that came out of this meeting is that they do not
believe that the SoCal Border is the appropriate index.  They believe that
the PG&E City Gate is more reflective of what the market price is.  They
claim that the SoCal point reflects the El Paso cuts.

In a passing comment John Baileys indicated that they have gotten a number of
 proposals that are attractive on both El Paso and TW.

John Baileys wants to do something with Citizens and is interested in a term
that would go for a least 2 years.  I ask if going through September 03 had
appeal and he responded affirmatively.  He also said that a provision that
allowed for available capacity to move up or down would be acceptable.

PPL wants to keep this process on a fast track, as do we.

The next steps:

1) PPL will provide a counter proposal on Monday.

2) Chris, what insight can you provide on the index issue.  I do not have
much history on that point, but on Friday of last week PGE City Gate was
$9.08 while SoCal Border was $10.90.  What are the historical prices for PGE?
 What are the drivers for the price differences between PGE and SoCal?  Is
the PGE index mature?  I have not followed it.  Is it a more appropriate
index for TW?

Hopefully we can catch up in the morning from Phoenix.

John


Eric:

I have talked to Alan Aronowitz about this as well.  You need more resources
immediately from inside.  We will also have to recruit outside to get enough
resources as the business grows.

Regards,

Mark

	Eric Gonzales
	12/06/2000 04:45 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EGM Legal Support

Mark,

I just wanted to send you a quick note regarding the LNG legal support.  As
we discussed several weeks ago, I am concerned that within Dan Rodgers
current group of resources there is no one with ECT commodity transaction
experience.  This lack of experience is very noticeable to our commercial
team as the current legal group is on a steep learning curve and given our
immediate deal requirements.  Dan and I spoke about this yesterday and agreed
that he will expedite the effort to recruiting someone from within ECT.   I
believe not only will this person help enormously within our current deal
flow but he/she would be a great resource for the other EGM legal team
members regarding commodity transactions.

The main reason for this note is to enlist your help to get the right person
into the group.  I will routinely be checking with Dan as to the progress we
are making on this effort.

Thanks for your help in this effort.

Eric


You might want to talk to your Credit team about the Top Ten List for the
Legal/Credit meeting.  I think we're only at 3 top ten.


Hello Mr. Derrick:

It was a pleasure talking to you yesterday about our yoga classes, it was very interesting hearing your opinion about the Power Yoga!

I also mentioned to you that I am running a marathon in Hawaii on December 9.  I am running on behalf of Sarah, a cute 10 year old girl that has arthritis since she was 18 months old and she hasn't been able to be a normal kid.  If you don't mind I would like to ask you if you will be so kind to sponsor me with a small donation to this worthy organization.  I actually, committed to collect $3,800 for them to be able to run de marathon and I was doing so great that I almost had it made, but today when we received the email about no more matching donations put me a little bit behind.

Please let me know and I could send Joey to pick up the donation.  If not, please don't feel bad, I understand we are going through very hard times lately.

Thank you so much, Mr. Derrick and I will be seeing you at the yoga class if you can make it on Saturday.

Candy  :  )
1400 Smith, Ste. 4855
EB-4855
713-345-4455


Here is the link for the new website format for the Weekly Report.

Weekly Report


Holly Keiser
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Phone: 713-345-7893
Fax: 713-646-3490
Location: EB 3887
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-04984     Eff Date: 2001-06-06

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                 2,175
Working                           0                 2,175
Capacity Allocation               0                 2,175
Confirmed                         0                 1,325  CBL


At 12:30 EST, ICE will be packaging the Next Day Phys Gas strip for the following dates:

11/22/01 - 11/26/01.

Happy Thanksgiving


Hi,

	 	The power options trading desk is beginning to structure deals and to make markets in spark spread options ( options on the spreads between power prices and natural gas prices).  Please refer to the attached file for further information.

 	   	It would be most helpful to meet with the relevant individuals  on the Gas desk  who would be interested in spark spread options.

	 	 Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Kind regards,
Iris Mack, MBA/PhD
Enron Power Options Trading Desk
x3-6711


Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net
----- Forwarded by Marie Heard/Enron Communications on 11/10/00 02:18 PM -----

	Anne_Heard@ryderscott.com
	11/10/00 01:25 PM

		 To: marie.heard@enron.com, rsheard2@juno.com
		 cc: (bcc: Marie Heard/Enron Communications)
		 Subject: FW: Official Florida Ballot

-----Original Message-----
From: Gangluff, Kevin
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 1:21 PM
To: Heard, Anne
Subject: FW: Official Florida Ballot

Official Florida Ballot

This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individuals or
entities to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged and/or confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying of, or the taking of any
action in reliance upon the contents of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately at 713-651-9191. Thank you.

 <<Floridab.jpg>>


Robert just called in and had some more details.  He talked to Gay again.

Sunny is OK, walked away from the wreck.  It totaled her car.  The airbag did not inflate so she was very lucky not to be hurt.

He will report more when he gets there.

Randy J.


Saturday, November 17, 2001

Dear Peter,

Travelocity Fare Watcher, your personal airfare tracking
service, has found fare changes in 3 of your markets.

Note: Fares change quickly and sell out fast. Visit Travelocity
now to take advantage of this great opportunity!  Click on this
link or paste the URL into your browser:
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemindiv.ctl?fw=018N0G2&Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

HAVE YOUR TRAVEL NEEDS CHANGED?

Looking to go someplace new? Be sure to update your Fare Watcher
subscription to include your favorite destinations.

FARES

*  IAH-LGA   FROM: Houston-Bush Intercontinental (IAH)
             TO:   New York LaGuardia (LGA)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE        WAS        DIFFERENCE
             ---------      -------      ----------
             $208.00        $262.00      -$54.00

*  LGA-IAH   FROM: New York LaGuardia (LGA)
             TO:   Houston-Bush Intercontinental (IAH)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE        WAS        DIFFERENCE
             ---------      -------      ----------
             $208.00        $262.00      -$54.00

*  IAH-JFK   FROM: Houston-Bush Intercontinental (IAH)
             TO:   New York Kennedy (JFK)
   PRICE:    NEW PRICE        WAS        DIFFERENCE
             ---------      -------      ----------
             $208.00        $262.00      -$54.00

GREAT HOTEL DEALS!

Travelocity.com offers Value Rates at great hotels in:
New York LaGuardia (LGA) starting at just $69
Click: http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=LGA&rate_cat=V

Houston-Bush Intercontinental (IAH) starting at just $55
Click: http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=IAH&rate_cat=V

New York Kennedy (JFK) starting at just $69
Click: http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/hotsrqst.ctl?mode=2&airport=JFK&rate_cat=V

Thank you for choosing Travelocity as your one-stop travel
resource!

Sincerely,

The Travelocity Team
Travelocity.com - Go Virtually Anywhere
http://www.travelocity.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------

VACATION DEALS!

Hot deals to the Caribbean, Las Vegas, and more!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_VAC,00.html

CRUISE DEALS!

Don't miss a look at our incredible Cruise Deals! Updated daily,
find the voyage that suits your budget!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/RealDeals/0,2942,TRAVELOCITY_CRU,00.html

SAVE $75 IN AIRFARE

Get $75 in Rebates on your next Airfare Purchases!
Join the Travelocity Preferred Traveler Program and you'll
receive up to $75 in rebates on your next three flights, hotel
savings and room upgrades, up to 20% off at restaurants
nationwide, and more. Enroll today!
http://leisure.travelocity.com/preferredtraveler/?source=PM

EARN FREE TRAVEL. NO RESTRICTIONS!

The NEW Travelocity World MasterCard
Earn points towards free travel with new Travelocity MasterCard!
You'll earn 1 point for every dollar spent. Earn 8,000 points
and you'll receive $100 off your next Travelocity.com booking.
We'll spot you 4,000 points to get started, so you are already
half way there! Visit http://www.travelocitycard.com to apply.

IMPORTANT FARE INFORMATION:

All fares are quoted in US Dollars.  Fares shown are for one
adult round-trip between your selected cities and are subject
to additional charges, including, but not limited to, Passenger
Facility Charges (ranging from $2-$18), Federal Segment Fees of
$2.75 per segment (defined as a takeoff and a landing), and
taxes/fees associated with international itineraries of up to
USD $113 or local currency equivalent. Fuel surcharges, if applicable
are included in the fees listed.

Total fare per passenger, including all charges, will always
be displayed to you prior to final ticket purchase. Please note
that fares are subject to restrictions, may not be available on
all flights, and may change without notice. For detailed descriptions
of the fare rules, click on the corresponding rules link.

CHANGE OR CANCEL YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TO FAREWATCHER EMAIL
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

UPDATE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/fwemsub.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN

RETRIEVE YOUR PASSWORD
http://dps1.travelocity.com:80/lognpwdform.ctl?Service=TRAVELOCITY&LANG=EN


Current Notes User:

                REASONS FOR USING OUTLOOK WEB ACCESS (OWA)

1. Once your mailbox has been migrated from Notes to Outlook, the Outlook
client will be configured on your computer.
After migration of your mailbox, you will not be able to send or recieve
mail via Notes, and you will not be able to start using Outlook until it is
configured by the Outlook Migration team the morning after your mailbox is
migrated.  During this period, you can use Outlook Web Access (OWA) via
your web browser (Internet Explorer 5.0) to read and send mail.

PLEASE NOTE:  Your calendar entries, personal address book, journals, and
To-Do entries imported from Notes will not be available until the Outlook
client is configured on your desktop.

2. Remote access to your mailbox.
After your Outlook client is configured, you can use Outlook Web Access
(OWA) for remote access to your mailbox.

PLEASE NOTE:  At this time, the OWA client is only accessible while
connecting to the Enron network (LAN).  There are future plans to make OWA
available from your home or when traveling abroad.

                  HOW TO ACCESS OUTLOOK WEB ACCESS (OWA)

Launch Internet Explorer 5.0, and in the address window type:
http://nahou-msowa01p/exchange/john.doe

Substitute "john.doe" with your first and last name, then click ENTER.  You
will be prompted with a sign in box as shown below.  Type in "corp/your
user id" for the user name and your NT password to logon to OWA and click
OK.  You will now be able to view your mailbox.

     (Embedded image moved to file: pic18467.pcx)

PLEASE NOTE:  There are some subtle differences in the functionality
between the Outlook and OWA clients.  You will not be able to do many of
the things in OWA that you can do in Outlook.  Below is a brief list of
*some* of the functions NOT available via OWA:

Features NOT available using OWA:

-  Tasks
-  Journal
-  Spell Checker
-  Offline Use
-  Printing Templates
-  Reminders
-  Timed Delivery
-  Expiration
-  Outlook Rules
-  Voting, Message Flags and Message Recall
-  Sharing Contacts with others
-  Task Delegation
-  Direct Resource Booking
-  Personal Distribution Lists

                          QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS?

If you have questions or concerns using the OWA client, please contact the
Outlook 2000 question and answer Mailbox at:

     Outlook.2000@enron.com

Otherwise, you may contact the Resolution Center at:

     713-853-1411

Thank you,

Outlook 2000 Migration Team
 - pic18467.pcx


not much.  i am trying to sell my house so i have been looking for a new house recently.  there are some cool things that i have found.  i have been going out a little, but not like we did in the beginning of the year.  that was fun.  when i move i will throw a big party and we can start it up again.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gillette, Lisa
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 2:34 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

wow, that was terribly poor grammar... you will have to excuse me, i am a bit tired. yes, jury duty does suck especially when its for 6 days in the middle of 3Q earnings. i haven't been going out much. this weekend sue and i went to new braunfels to meet up with some friends. what have you been up to?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 2:20 PM
To:	Gillette, Lisa
Subject:	RE:

your last sentence sounded like an indian speaking english.  i was wondering why you didn't respond.  jury duty sucks huh?  have you been going out at all?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gillette, Lisa
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 2:09 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

hey, how are you? sorry, i didnt respond sooner... i was in jury duty all last week. still undecided on india. priya is contemplating staying even longer even things here are the same come june.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:10 PM
To:	Gillette, Lisa
Subject:

lisa lisa-

what have you been up to?  you still moving to india or is your buddy moving back here.


Steve - FYI, as discussed lst week, here is the statement we are issuing on
the so-called acceleration directives being considered in Stockholm this
week.  I suggested using Ken/Jeff/john Sherriff as the quoted, laudatory
official in the company, but the view seems to be that if we quote them, they
have to be up to speed to respond to other press inquiries, i.e., subsequent
inquiries cannot be deflected to more junior people like Peter or me.  Any
way, both an explanation of why we did not use Ken or Jeff, and fyi, what we
actually said is contained in the attached.   let me know if you have
questions or need more.  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 21/03/2001
17:12 ---------------------------

Eva Hoeffelman
21/03/2001 17:05
To: laura.currie@edelman.com
cc: Eric Shaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark
Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT,
Andrew Morrison/LON/ECT@ECT, Julie Green/LON/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ralston/EU/Enron@ENRON, Christina_Mueller@de.cohnwolfe.com,
ot@geelmuyden-kiese.no, Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT,
Ross Sankey/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt. Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Alfredo
Huertas/LON/ECT@ECT, Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT, Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Andreas Radmacher/FRA/ECT@ECT, Gregor Baumerich/LON/ECT@ECT, Teun Van
Biert/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Mead/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Stockholm statement

Laura,
Please find attached the final version of the statement re the Stockholm
meeting approved by regulatory and legal.

As we discussed and per your memo below, please send this tonight to all the
Brussels correspondents Peter spoke to (or established a relationship with)
in the last few months re European energy liberalisation including Patrick
Cox of Bloomberg (today), Philip Shiskin from the WSJ last Monday and Daniel
Dombey from the FT last week.  Peter covered most of these points already
today in his Bloomberg interview (France and Germany in particular were not
really touched upon).

We will also use it on a reactive basis for when correspondents contact you
there in Brussels, us here in London, C&W in Frankfurt and GK in Oslo. Please
let us know any enquiries you might receive before sending out the statement.

Many thanks

Eva

ps For those who want to see an overview of the current status of our
Brussels/Pan-European media relations programme, please see the attached memo
(stockholm statem-distribut list.doc).


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041714.txt


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSCHWIE>
To: helnswig@aol.com
Date: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:35:43 GMT
Subject:

thought you might enjoy this!

	Love, Swig

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Baumbach, David
> Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:03 PM
> To:	Bass, Eric; Olsen, Michael; Smith, Joseph; Hull, Bryan; Farmer,
> Daren J.; Schwieger, Jim; Martin, Thomas A.; Weldon, V. Charles;
> Parks, Joe
> Subject:	 terrorists
>
>
> >
> > We've been notified by Building Security that there have been 4
> > suspected terrorists working at our office. Three of the four have
> been
> > apprehended.
> >
> > Bin Sleepin, Bin Loafin, and Bin Drinkin have been taken into
> custody.
> > Security advised us that they could find no one fitting the
> description
> > of the fourth cell member, Bin Workin, in the office. Police are
> confident
> > that anyone who looks like he's Bin Workin will be very easy to
> spot.
> >

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001
01:40 PM ---------------------------

"Whitsel, Kimberly" <whitselk@wharton.upenn.edu> on 02/15/2001 09:34:38 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, Christie.Patrick@enron.com
cc: nick@alum.mit.edu, "Bhalla, Tulika" <bhallat@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Chen,
Vincent" <chenvinc@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Rejtman, Jack"
<rejtmanj@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Mallik, Deepa"  <mallikd@wharton.upenn.edu>,
"Whitsel, Kimberly"  <whitselk@wharton.upenn.edu>, "Thorne, Heather"
<hethorne@wharton.upenn.edu>, "'Thomas'" <Thomas@wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: Presentation for Conference Call

Good Morning,

Attached is our presentation for today's videoconference.  We look forward to
discussing our progress on the project at 4:30.

Regard,
Enron Team 1

 - 150201 Enron Conference Call.ppt


Heather Dunton is out of the office Friday Oct 5th returning Monday Oct 22nd.


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 08:28:37 -0600
From: "Dave Molnar" <DaveM@cajunusa.com>
To: "Mark Molnar" <MarkM@cajunusa.com>
Subject: Chris Simms brings balance to the force
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

Many people are concerned with the state of Chris Simms confidence going into next season now that he has been benched for the bowl game.  There is no reason for panic as the scenario shall play out like this.  The Longhorns and Huskies will be tied at 28 late in the fourth quarter of the Holiday Bowl.  Applewhite will lead the Horns on a miraculous 50-yd drive down to the Washington 30-yd line with only 10 sec left on the clock.  Between plays Applewhite will look over at the Golden Boy standing on the sideline and recognize that the time is now for Simms to fulfill his Destiny.  As the Star Wars music plays in the background, Applewhite will lead the Horns up to the line of scrimmage.  In Obi-Wan Kenobi-to-Darth Vader fashion, Major will look across the line at the Huskies defense and say,"Strike me down and I shall become more powerful than you could ever imagine."  As the ball is snapped, Major drops back in the pocket and then stands motionless, allowing the Huskies linebackers to pummel him.  Simms screams, "NO!!!" as Major lies motionless on the field.  Major is carted off the field with numerous broken bones while the Golden Boy takes his warm-up tosses on the sideline.  The clock sits at 4 seconds remaining as Simms trots onto the field.  Only enough time for one try at the endzone.  Simms walks to the line, takes the snap and begins to look over the field.  As Simms prepares to unload a blazing bullet pass right into the hands of a Washington safety, he hears Major's voice in his mind, "Use the force Chris, read the field".  The Golden Boy brings his throwing arm down, the Star Wars music plays once again, and Chris looks over the entire field for the first time since playing the School for the Blind back in Jersey.  Simms spots Roy Williams wide open, closes his eyes, and fires a 30 yd touchdown pass for the victory.  And hence the legend of the Golden Boy is alive and well.

Stay tuned for the next episode as Chris learns that his father is not ex-player/broadcaster Phil Simms, but is actually broadcaster Dennis Miller


See deal 151654.

Jackie Young
01/18/2000 04:59 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos J
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: 12/99 K's Needed and 1/2000 K's Needed

Daren,

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.   Just a reminder for you
to roll the first six days of December 1999 for 98-9789 Sitara #108246.

Carlos/Tom,

Please apprise when you've completed your research with Producer Services
referencing the below meters that Daren have referred to as "Contract
Terminated".

Daren J Farmer
01/18/2000 12:38 PM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: 12/99 K's Needed and 1/2000 K's Needed

See notes in red below.  In each case where the contract has been terminated,
Tom and/or Carlos will need to get with Producer Services to determine what
we need to do (set up a GTC, renegotiate the term deal, etc).

D

Jackie Young
01/18/2000 11:24 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 12/99 K's Needed and 1/2000 K's Needed

Daren, can you help me with placing K's @ the below listed meters?  I don't
know if these deals should be rolled or if new ones were set up.

I'll need a K @ each specified meter for the month following the noted month
that had a K @ it.

Thanks in advance for your help.
-Jackie-
3-9497

98-1534 (Delivery) Last flowed w/ a K was 12/99 on 215K Sitara #95541(Stop
Date 12/99)  New deal added for January #151694
98-6563 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was11/99 on 203K Sitara #26511, then new
sitara #130913(which was killed) Evergreen was checked on         this one.
Contract terminated.
98-6614 (Receipt) Sitara #130917-this deal's stop date is 2/29/2000.  The
deal amount is for 1487 mmbtu's but the estimated vols. are "0".  Did not
want to change anything in Sitara without your knowledge.  This is a good
deal. For the first part of the month, you should nom the zero to POPS.
Beginning tomorrow, we will have volume out there on this ticket.

98-9758 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 96026573 Sitara #133088(Stop
Date 12/99) Evergreen was checked on this one.  Contract terminated.
98-9651 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 96026573 Sitara #51491(Stop
Date 12/99) New Deal #136744 (Deal Killed)  Contract terminated.
98-9789 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 11/99 on 012-41500-02-203 Sitara
#108246 (Stop Date 11/99)  Deal rolled for six days to cover flow.
98-5789 (Receipt)  Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 96026573 Sitara #26569
(Stop Date 12/99)  Contract terminated.
98-6855 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 215K Sitara #94120 (Stop
Date 12/99)  Deal was rolled for Jan.
98-6725 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a Kwas 12/99 on 215K Sitara #138332 (Stop
Date 12/99)  This was a spot deal.  We will have to renegotiate the price to
cover the flow.  I will work with Craig Faulbaum on this.
98-9676 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 215K Sitara #95912 (Stop
Date 12/99)  New deal 151669 for Jan
98-4548 (Receipt) Last flowed w/a K was 12/99 on 96026573 Sitara #94147 (Stop
Date 12/99)  New deal 151666 for Jan


Sorry Nyree. No exceptions.

Monika

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chanaba, Nyree
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 1:44 PM
To:	Causholli, Monika
Cc:	Reed, Andrea V.
Subject:	TIMESHEETS
Importance:	High

I need to know if you have any exceptions (vacation, sick,...) for pay-period Oct 15-31.  If you do not, please reply with "no exceptions"  we need to keep records for both our benefits.

Thank you for your assistance,
Nyree I. Chanaba
713-345-4035
EIM Fundamental Analysis


Just so you had the latest matrices; although some of you directly received
these materials.  I anticipate being able to send you a revised draft of the
Purchase and Sale Agreement by next Tuesday morning.  No doubt, everything
will become clear in the next draft - materiality, Subject Companies,
required Authorizations, etc.  I anticipate circulating a full draft of the
Schedules by mid next week.  The plan would be to revise the draft schedules
based on the revised text of the Agreement and your further review of the
respective businesses generally.  We will also need to keep in mind some
sense of conformity as to how each unit is making their respective
disclosures.  The Schedules will not need to win an award for beauty at that
point, but do need to be well organized and make sense.  I encourage each of
the General Counsels to coordinate with Mary Joyce on HR matters, Frank Smith
or Dave Nutt on environmental matters, Cullen Duke on tax matters, Bob
Williams and Chuck Cheek on litigation matters, Rick Shapiro on regulatory
matters, and Jim Bouillion on insurance matters, just to make sure nothing
slips through the cracks.  Timing of course is critical.  The Disclosure
Schedules may become critical path items, and we may all hear that.    I
expect there will be great progress generally next week, and there will be
tremendous pressure to deliver a complete draft of the Schedules to Skadden
soon after the end of next week.  Your comments would likely need to be in by
the end of the week - sorry.  Please be aware that the Business Unit heads,
right before execution of the Agreement, are likely to have to sign-off on
the disclosures under the Agreement.  Truly, thanks for all the help.  Send
money or Disclosure Schedules.  Lance.
----- Forwarded by Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT on 07/21/2000 05:07 PM -----

	Nicole Alvino
	07/21/2000 12:22 PM

		 To: Bill Gathmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Randy
Young/SA/Enron@ECT, John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Fred L Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen
Carnahan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel
Castagnola/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ricky Lynn
Waddell/SA/Enron@Enron, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey E
Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ananda
Mukerji/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christopher B
Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph Franz/Corp/Enron@Enron,
lbrasher@skadden.com, bhoghooghi@skadden.com, Sashby@skadden.com
		 cc: Cheryl Lipshutz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cullen
Duke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON,
Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie
Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amit Walia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ceci Torn/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Patrick Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, mspradling@velaw.com, jdilg@velaw.com,
wjoor@velaw.com, sbarber@velaw.com, ashouse@velaw.com, ckornreich@velaw.com,
jkamine@velaw.com, bweiland@velaw.com, jamie.welch@csfb.com,
david.munoz@csfb.com, Victor.gonzalez@csfb.com, bradley.aitken@velaw.com
		 Subject: Project Summer Matrices

Attached please find the latest and greatest ABC matrix and Gty, LC, and
affiliate contract matrix.  The information has been updated in red by
comments we have recieved from the EI business units.  The new transfer level
and sever level info came from the A/B/C structure task force.  (Please note
that the A/B transfer level is the same as the sever level unless ptherwise
noted.)  It still needs to be reviewed by both sides.  We are waiting for
final regulatory issues and action items this weekend after a collaborative
effort from both sides.  There are still pieces of info in these matrices
that the deal team needs that are highlighted in blue.  Please fill in TBD to
the extent you can determine and send it back in green.

Please review both matrices and send changes to Nicole Alvino and Bill
Gathmann.

Thanks so much for all your help!


PG&E Gas Transmission-Northwest will be performing unscheduled maintenance
at Station 14 on Friday, May 11, to replace a dry seal on the Station 14
A-unit.  The maintenance will reduce the capacity through the compressor
station to 1750 MMcf/d for Gas Day Friday, May 11, 2001.

If you have any questions, please call our transportation coordinators at
(503) 833-4300.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Start Date: 1/4/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010424.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: 118.26 / Final: 118.23)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SDG1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 1/4/02
  SC_ID: ENRJ


Can you please extend sitara deal #156657 for 3/1/00, if the deal will
allow?  It was transported on the 215K, which was the only one out there for
2/00.

It spilled over into March on day 1 for .423 dec.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


What was the point of that statement?  It sure seemed like a non-statement...


Ladies,

Thanks for your help with this meeting for tomorrow, May 8th.....this is the first out of four to be confirmed.

EES Meeting
05/08/01
Noon - 2pm
rm 872

Attendees

Kevin Presto
Rogers Herndon
Don Black
Dave Delainey
Janet Dietrich
Tim Belden
John Lavorato

Thanks again for your help,

Tjae
x35800

Kim -

Could you check on the availabilty of conference room 3321for the following EES risk/trading integration meetings:

Tuesday, May 7, 2001:

9:30 am  - 11:30 am - Tariffs and Dereg Meeting
2:00 pm - 4: 00 pm - New Deal Meeting w/ Dave Delainey and Janet Dietrich

Wednesday, May 8, 2001:

9:30 am - 11: 30 am - Reporting Meeting
1:00 pm - 3:00 pm - Systems/Technical Issues Meeting

Please let John know that these meetings are being scheduled and that his attendance has been requested.  Follow- up formal invites will follow as soon as details are ironed out such as availability of location.

Thanks,
Rogers Herndon


Thanks for the update.

From: John Hardy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/10/2001 09:48 AM
To: Rebecca McDonald/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Ben Glisan@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: USG overtures on Dabhol

Rebecca
 At a meeting yesterday at OPIC on Trakya, another of our problem projects,
Dabhol was raised.  A representative from the White House transition team
joined the conversation.  I was asked the terms under which we were prepared
to negotiate and I told them at a minimum upon a commitment by the Indian
authorities to serious negotiations which would include full compliance with
the terms of the contracts and progress in the reform of the MSEB.  I made
clear that we do not see the Godbole Committee as the basis for such a
discussion.
 I think the USG wants to be on record politically encouraging the Indian
Govt. to engage in discussions all parties consider to be meaningful in hopes
of working things out before it is too late, even while through OPIC and EXIM
it is supporting the move towards PNT.  The administration may be concerned
that without such a diplomatic overture on its part it could be concluded
that the USG has politically taken a position on the project.
 In Trakya, for example, the USG has been quite proactive in pressing the
Turkish govt on the payments issue and even in discussing the payment
concerns with the IMF so that the payments issues for the BOTs (two of the
four in Turkey are US sponsored) are taken into account as the IMF program
moves forward.
 So I anticipate that the USG will shortly be meeting with the Indian
ambassador here and the US Charge in Delhiwill likely be directed to make the
rounds and meet with senior government officals on the project.
 I wanted you to be aware of this; also any guidance you can provide would be
helpful.  Thanks John


Mary & Lisa,
Please follow up w/ Chris on his e-mail (redraft.....).

Chris,
I am now officially in Power.  Please forward all CES related issues to Lisa
and Mary.  They are also working w/ the OA team on the o/s issues.  Thanks.
ajc

ajc
---------------------- Forwarded by Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 12:35
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
12/05/2000 08:21 AM
To: Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Audrey
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CGAS deal 213360

There is a demand charge of  $-.22 x 900000 on this deal ticket.  I think the
demand charge should be $-.22 x 10,000 x # days on the month.  This equals
900,000 over the term of the deal.  I changed the demand charge volume to
310,000  for Dec
310,000 for Jan
280,000 for Feb

Audrey, the global contract is 96017642 and 12/2000 is the first month of
this deal.  We should receive and invoice from COH for the demand charge.
There is a very slim chance we will be selling COH any gas on this deal for
the month.  Would you forward this email to the person that handles COH?

Thanks
chris

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 08:08
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
12/04/2000 01:56 PM
To: Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: CGAS deal 213360

ENA has a put to COH (deal 213360) for up to 10,000 dth/day.  This deal was
in the system for December and I just took it to 0 for the whole month.  I
estimate we should make about $495,000 on the deal change.

Kimat, this deal also has a demand charge that ENA pays COH for the put.  I
believe its in the deal correctly.

Alvin, please show this on the morning sheet as a "Put to COH at IF" or
something real intelligent like that.

This deal goes thru 2/28/01.


fyi -----Original Message-----
From: Santana, Vedruna J [mailto:SantanaVJ@state.gov]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:13 AM
To: 'skean@enron.com'; 'mmetts@enron.com'; 'rmcdonald@enron.com'
Subject: FW: ENRON

Dear Mr. Kean
Please find below a letter from the Zambia Electricity Supply Corporation seeking your services.
Mr. Nyirenda has been working with the American Embassy, Lusaka, Commercial Section to make contact with your organisation. I hope that his letter will be of interest to you.
Your sincerely,
Vedruna Santana
Commercial Specialist
American Embassy
Lusaka
Tel: 260 1 250955
Fax: 260 1 252225
Email: SantanaVJ@state.gov <mailto:SantanaVJ@state.gov>

-----Original Message-----
From: A.S. Nyirenda [mailto:asnyirenda@zesco.co.zm]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Santana, Vedruna J
Subject: ENRON

Dear Madam
Sorry I forgot to attach the letter itself.
Aaron S. Nyirenda : Project Manager- Generation

Zesco PRP,  P O Box 33304, Lusaka, Zambia
Telephone +260 1 239343/ 237597  Fax +260 1 239343/ 237597/223970
Email: asnyirenda@zesco.co.zm <mailto:asnyirenda@zesco.co.zm> or  prpzesco@zamnet.zm <mailto:prpzesco@zamnet.zm>


The Democrats just keep giving and giving to the honor and prestige of the
office of the President of the United States.

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


Shirley:

Thank you very much for the e-mail. Attached please
find the copy of my resume, please treat it with high
confidentiality.

I would love to fly to Houston this Friday to talk to
Vince and other people in Enron, and I will fly from
Tulsa, Oklahoma to Houston. When you make the flight
reservation, please make sure to use my legal name
"Yingquan Shen".

If you have any questions, please feel free to let me
know.

sincerely,
Charles

--- Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com wrote:
> Mr. Shen:
>
> Vince Kaminski and the Research Group would like to
> bring you in for an
> interview this Friday, if possible.  Please forward
> me a copy of your
> resume, as soon as possible, and I will have our HR
> dept. contact you.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Shirley Crenshaw
> Administrative Coordinator
> Enron Research Dept.
> 713/853-5290
>
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
 - Charles_Shen.doc


Bill
Attached is a drfat letter responding to AH's 11/6 letter to you with respect to derivative transactions between AH and ENA.  Kim is tracking down the 10/12 confirm

Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Errol,

what is the username and password ?

-----Original Message-----
From: McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Arnold, John; Bajwa, Bilal; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Griffith, John; Huan, George; 'michael.maggi@enron.com'; May, Larry; McDowell, Shirley; McKinney, Hal; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Quigley, Dutch; Riordan, Sean; Taylor, Joey
Subject: TRV Notification: (NG - PROPT P&L - 05/22/2001)

The report named: NG - PROPT P&L <http://trv.dev.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=11&report_name=NG+-+PROPT+P&L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=05/22/2001>, published as of 05/22/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

Publisher's Notes:

test


My fault on Tomas, I didn't remind Kevin.  It won't happen again.

DG    3-9573

Jeffrey C Gossett
11/30/2000 07:27 AM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Basis Positions

On the Benchmark, these traders basis positions were not rolled off.    Is
there something further that I need to do to make sure that happens in the
future?

Thanks

Neal
Tomaski
Schwieger
Arnold


When: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please note that today's call has been rescheduled to 1:00 CST.  I told Paul
Hastings to dial in using the usual Sprint conference call number.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


You coming?


Mr. Collins,

Mr. Skilling is considering this invitation and has requested a bit more
information.  What time are the awards presentations taking place on April
11?  Mr. Skilling does have an appointment in New York at 8:00 a.m. on April
12  that would be very difficult to reschedule.  Given this time constraint,
I'm not sure it will work.  Please advise at your earliest convenience.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 Fax

"Peter Collins" <collins@risk.co.uk> on 02/24/2000 10:30:30 AM
Please respond to "Peter Collins" <collins@risk.co.uk>
To: <jskilli@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RISK AWARDS PRESENTATION

I am sure you are aware that as part of  first ever Risk Awards - published
in January - Enron Corporation achieved the  accolade: Energy/commodity
derivatives house of the  year.

This award was won, not simply  because of your lead in energy and power in
the US, but because of the lead  Enron has taken in new areas of risk
management.

We very much hope you can join us to be presented  with the Award at the Risk
2000 Europe Congress in Paris on April 11th - we  invite you to attend the
conference as a full delegate and I am sure there are a  number of sessions
which will be of interest to you. A formal invitation will  follow from our
editor.

We also intend to publish a special  supplement that will provide Awards
winners with an excellent opportunity to  celebrate their achievements
through advertising.

This supplement will be distributed with the  March issue of Risk and to all
delegates attending the Risk 2000  Congress.

For more details on the  Risk 2000 congress please click this link:
http://www.riskpublications.com/risk2000euro/index.htm

I hope that my email is clear and I will  contact you shortly to find-out
your reactions to our proposal - however if you  have any questions
beforehand - please feel free to contact  me.

Kind regards,

?
Peter  Collins
RISK MAGAZINE
Haymarket House
28-29  Haymarket
London? SW1Y 4RX
?
Dir:? +44 (0)171 484 9738
Fax: +44  (0)171 930 2238


1. For this week, please be sure you have read a story on determinants or
costs
of long-term or very high inflation and/or on very high or long-term
unemployment.  Later in the course we will examine changes in unemployment and
inflation (and their relation) in the short run; this week we focus on
definitions and long-run determinants and costs.  (Hint: for unemployment,
what
has happened to the workweek in France?)

2. Concerning growth, you might want to look at:  Report: Corruption Ruining
Economies Of South Asia
        http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/19991101/wl/asia_un_1.html
(a Reuters story)

3. Concerning measurement of "The New Economy," a fellow student recommends
the
Economist article at
http://www.economist.com/editorial/freeforall/current/index_fn8276.html
will all the pretty pics and graphs, or the plain text version below.

E-xaggeration: The digital economy is much smaller than you think

NEWSPAPERS and magazines are packed with stories about the digital economy,
the information-technology (IT) revolution and the Internet age. That their
pages are filled with advertising from IT firms presumably has nothing to do
with it. Such firms account for a quarter of the total value of the S&P 500,
and this week Dow Jones announced that Microsoft, Intel and SBC
Communications will be included in its industrial average from November 1st.
Not before time, many say, for high-technology businesses now account for a
huge chunk of the economy. Actually, they don't.
New figures published on October 28th by America's Department of Commerce
appear to support the view that IT is very important to the American
economy. The department now counts all business spending on software as
investment (previously, it was a cost). This has both increased the apparent
size of IT investment and boosted America's rate of growth in recent years.
But measuring the size of the "new" economy is a statistical minefield. The
most generous estimate comes from the OECD, which tracks the
"knowledge-based economy". It estimates that this accounts for 51% of total
business output in the developed economies-up from 45% in 1985. But this
definition, which tries to capture all industries that are relatively
intensive in their inputs of technology and human capital, is implausibly
wide. As well as computers and telecoms, it also includes cars, chemicals,
health, education, and so forth. It would be a stretch to call many of these
businesses "new".
A study published in June by the Department of Commerce estimates that the
digital economy-the hardware and software of the computer and telecoms
industries-amounts to 8% of America's GDP this year. If that sounds rather
disappointing, then a second finding-that IT has accounted for 35% of total
real GDP growth since 1994-should keep e-fanatics happy.
Perhaps unwisely. A new analysis by Richard Sherlund and Ed McKelvey of
Goldman Sachs argues that even this definition of "technology" is too wide.
They argue that since such things as basic telecoms services, television,
radio and consumer electronics have been around for ages, they should be
excluded. As a result, they estimate the computing and
communications-technology sector at a more modest 5% of GDP-up from 2.8% in
1990. This would make it bigger than the car industry, but smaller than
health care or finance. In most other economies, the share is lower; for the
world as a whole, therefore, the technology sector might be only 3-4% of
GDP.
But what, you might ask, about the Internet? Goldman Sachs's estimate
includes Internet service providers, such as America Online, and the
technology and software used by online retailers, such as Amazon.com. It
does not, however, include transactions over the Internet. Should it?
E-business is tiny at present, but Forrester Research, an Internet
consultancy, estimates that this will increase to more than $1.5 trillion in
America by 2003. Internet bulls calculate that this would be equivalent to
about 13% of GDP. Yet it is misleading to take the total value of such goods
and services, whose production owes nothing to the Internet. The value added
of Internet sales-ie, its contribution to GDP-would be much less, probably
little more than 1% of GDP.
This is not to deny that the Internet is changing the way that many firms do
business-by, for example, enabling them to slim inventories-but, in the near
future, as a proportion of GDP, it is likely to remain small.
A Luddite's lament

If measuring the size of the technology sector is hard, calculating its
contribution to real economic growth is trickier still, because the prices
of IT goods and services (adjusted for quality) have fallen sharply relative
to the prices of other goods and services. For example, official figures
show that America's spending on IT has risen by 14% a year in nominal terms
since 1992, but by more than 40% a year in real terms. This figure is so
high partly because it is extremely sensitive to assumptions about the rate
at which the price and quality of IT is changing.
The Commerce Department calculates that the technology sector has
contributed 35% to overall economic growth over the past four years. But
because such figures are based on spending in real terms, the Goldman Sachs
study reckons they are misleading. In nominal terms, IT has accounted for a
more modest 10% of GDP growth in the past four years.
Another popularly quoted figure is that business spending on IT has risen
from 10% of firms' total capital-equipment investment in 1980 to 60% today.
But again, this is based on constant-dollar figures, and so it hugely
exaggerates the true increase. In terms of current dollars (and before the
latest revisions), Goldman Sachs calcuate that business investment in
computers accounts for 35% of total capital spending, not 60%. And even this
exaggerates the importance of IT, because much of the money goes to replace
equipment which becomes obsolete ever more quickly. The share of IT in
additional "net" investment is much smaller. Computers still account for
only 2% of America's total net capital stock.
For years economists have been seeking in vain for evidence that computers
have dramatically raised productivity. One explanation for the failure of
productivity to surge may be that official statistics are understating its
growth. Another is that much investment in IT has been wasted: hours spent
checking e-mail, surfing the Net or playing games reduce, not increase,
productivity. A third may simply be that IT is still too small to make a
difference: for the moment, appropriately enough, you can count the digital
economy on the fingers of one hand.
That is changing, and firms are learning. And note this: if you add in all
computer software and telecoms (on the widest definition), the share of IT
in the capital stock rises to 10-12%. As it happens, this is almost the same
as railways at the peak of America's railway age in the late 19th century.
Railways boosted productivity and changed the face of Victorian commerce.
Hype is hype-but the new economy may yet happen anyway.

LINKS
The Commerce Department's statistics on information technology spending are
summarised in a press release
<http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/1999/cb99-205.html>. The complete
text of Emerging digital economy II
<http://www.ecommerce.gov/ede/report.html>, issued in June 1999, has been
released on the web. Details of the OECD's research on knowledge-based
economies are available here
<http://www.oecd.org//dsti/sti/stat-ana/prod/scorebd_summ.htm>. Forrester's
latest e-commerce estimates are published as a chart and table
<http://www.forrester.com/ER/Press/ForrFind/0,1768,0,FF.html>.

David I. Levine                 Associate professor
Haas School of Business    ph: 510/642-1697
University of California    fax: 510/643-1420
Berkeley CA  94720-1900                            email:
levine@haas.berkeley.edu
http://web.haas.berkeley.edu/www/levine/


17:05:43 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Kean, Steven J.'
17:05:43 Synchronizing Hierarchy
17:05:44 Synchronizing Favorites
17:05:44 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
17:05:53 	   17 item(s) added to offline folder
17:05:53 	   1 item(s) updated in offline folder
17:05:53 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
17:05:53 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
17:05:55 	   3 item(s) added to offline folder
17:05:55 	   2 item(s) updated in offline folder
17:05:55 Synchronizing Folder 'AADepartment'
17:05:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Administrative'
17:05:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Advertising'
17:05:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Advisory board on electricity and the environment'
17:05:55 Synchronizing Folder 'AEP/CSW'
17:05:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Affiliate rules'
17:05:55 Synchronizing Folder 'Africa'
17:05:55 Synchronizing Folder 'enron accelerator'
17:05:55 Synchronizing Folder 'American Indian Affairs'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'analyst meeting 2001'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'Ancillary services'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'annual report'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'antitrust'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'APEC'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'appropriations'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'Arena'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'argentina'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron Mentions'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'Arizona'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'asia-pacific'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'Associations'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'Audobon'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'australia'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'aviation'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'Azurix'
17:05:56 Synchronizing Folder 'Bandwidth trading'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'bankruptcy'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'bg&e'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'Billing issues'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'biography/history'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'BIPAC'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'board of directors'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'BPA'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'Br-Am Business Council'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'Brazil'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'Budget'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'Budget bill'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'Building'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'bush'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'Bush transition'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'business council'
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
17:05:57 	   1 view(s)/form(s) deleted in offline folder
17:05:57 Synchronizing Folder 'California'
17:05:58 Synchronizing Folder 'Ballot Initiative'
17:05:58 Synchronizing Folder 'california - demand buydown'
17:05:58 Synchronizing Folder 'california - emergency authority'
17:05:58 Synchronizing Folder 'California - excess profits tax'
17:05:58 Synchronizing Folder 'California - working group'
17:05:58 Synchronizing Folder 'California campaign'
17:05:58 Synchronizing Folder 'california humor'
17:05:58 Synchronizing Folder 'California-PG&E bankruptcy'
17:05:58 Synchronizing Folder 'Caliornia - investigations'
17:05:58 Synchronizing Folder 'CalPX'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'campaign 2000'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Canada'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Capacity assignment'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Carribean'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'CEC conference'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'CERA'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'CFTC'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Chamber of Commerce'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'China'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Coal'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Coal-Rail issues'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'committee assignments'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Compensation'
17:05:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Competition Index'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'Contact list'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'contributions'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'corporate communications'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'Corporate responsibility'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'Cost controls'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'CouncilForeignRelations'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'crisis'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'croatia'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'Cuiba'
17:06:00 Synchronizing Folder 'data'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'deals'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'Default customer issue'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'Delaware'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'Disclosure'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'disclosure rules'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'distribution services'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'diversity'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'divestiture'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'DOD'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'DOE'
17:06:01 Synchronizing Folder 'dominican republic'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'Y2k'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'Early Crediting'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'Earnings releases'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'EBR'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'EBS redeployment'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'Ecuador'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'EES'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'Active Markets List'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'EI'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'El Paso Electric'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'Elec -- SE'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'Elec--Mass'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'Elec-Michigan'
17:06:02 Synchronizing Folder 'Election 98 results'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Electricity restructuring advisory group'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'emerson'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron Advisonry Council'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron briefing center'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron Communications'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'enron credit'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron Field'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron financial info'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron global markets'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron history'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'ENRON MENTIONS'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron Networks'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron Online Summary'
17:06:03 Synchronizing Folder 'enron presence'
17:06:04 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron Property Services'
17:06:04 Synchronizing Folder 'Enron Wind'
17:06:04 Synchronizing Folder 'enron.com'
17:06:04 Synchronizing Folder 'Enrononline'
17:06:04 Synchronizing Folder 'Environmental Issues'
17:06:04 Synchronizing Folder 'EPA-gen performance standards'
17:06:04 Synchronizing Folder 'EOG'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'WTO'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'EOG--Wyoming Land Patent'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'ethanol'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'Europe'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'Expense Rep's'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'experience enron'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'facilities services'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'federal emergency'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'federal legislation'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'FERC'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'Fire chief'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'florida'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'fuel cells'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'Gas'
17:06:05 Synchronizing Folder 'Gas crisis'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'Gas-Georgia'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'Goals and Objectives 1999'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'Gore'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'Government Affairs Group reports'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'government affairs organization'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'Governor Davis meeting'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'Greenhouse gas business'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'health care issues'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'Heat wave'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'Hedge fund'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'Houston'
17:06:06 Synchronizing Folder 'Houston air'
17:06:07 Synchronizing Folder 'HR'
17:06:07 Synchronizing Folder 'HR stats'
17:06:07 Synchronizing Folder 'HR-data'
17:06:07 Synchronizing Folder 'humor'
17:06:07 Synchronizing Folder 'hydro'
17:06:07 Synchronizing Folder 'Illinois'
17:06:07 Synchronizing Folder 'IMF'
17:06:07 Synchronizing Folder 'implementation'
17:06:07 Synchronizing Folder 'Index'
17:06:07 Synchronizing Folder 'India'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'industrial customer services'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'Interconnection'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'world bank'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'internal communications'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'international'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'internet sites'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'Iowa'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'IPP'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'ISO'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'Japan'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'Key races'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'keystone'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'knowledge management'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'Korea'
17:06:08 Synchronizing Folder 'lobbying and contributions'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Logo'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Long Beach'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'market structure'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Market value'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Maryland'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Massachusetts'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'mckinsey project'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'media'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'mergers'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'merit'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'message development'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Metals'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Metering'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Mexico'
17:06:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Michigan'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'military privatizations'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'minnesota'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'Mississippi'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'MIT'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'MLP issue'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'MTBE'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'NACEC'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'Native American issues'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'Nebraska'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'Nepal'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'NERC'
17:06:10 Synchronizing Folder 'NERC nominating committee'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'networks'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'new hampshire'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'new jersey'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'New Mexico'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'New York'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'newton'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'NGO'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Nigeria'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'North Carolina'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'NOx'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'nuclear waste'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'OFCCP audit'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Ohio'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'OPIC'
17:06:11 Synchronizing Folder 'organization'
17:06:12 Synchronizing Folder 'organizations and associations'
17:06:12 Synchronizing Folder 'organizations and phone lists'
17:06:12 Synchronizing Folder 'PAC'
17:06:12 Synchronizing Folder 'Peakers'
17:06:12 Synchronizing Folder 'PECO'
17:06:12 Synchronizing Folder 'Pennsylvania'
17:06:12 Synchronizing Folder 'performance management'
17:06:12 Synchronizing Folder 'personal'
17:06:12 Synchronizing Folder 'personnel'
17:06:19 Synchronizing Folder 'Working groups'
17:06:19 Synchronizing Folder 'PG&E'
17:06:19 Synchronizing Folder 'PGE'
17:06:19 Synchronizing Folder 'phones'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Wisconsin'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Pipeline issues'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'position papers'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'PPL'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'PRC'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'PR-Crisis Management'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'presentations'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'press'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Press Releases'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Project California'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Project Summer'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'puerto rico'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'PUHCA'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'quotes'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'rail'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'reciprocity'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'redeployment'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Reg Reform'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Reg risk'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'regulatory and political risk management'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Reliability Task Force'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Religious persecution'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'reorganization'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'REPORTS'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Republican leadership'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Resco'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Residential letter'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'residential template'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'Resource management'
17:06:20 Synchronizing Folder 'resume'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Retail access summary'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'RFP form'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Rice'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'royalty in kind'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'RTO'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Saipan'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Sanctions'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Sandia Lab transmission group'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Saved Doc's'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'SEC'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'security'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Senate testimony re California'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Senate trip to England'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Ship Channel'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Sooner'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Southern Cone'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Special Project'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Speeches'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'staff meeting'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Standard Offer Service'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Standards of Conduct'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Stranded costs'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Strategy and objectives'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Survey'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Tax issues'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'telecom'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'texas'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'thank yous'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'To Do'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'trade issues'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Training'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Transco'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Transition guide'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Transmission'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'transportation market'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'transredes'
17:06:21 Synchronizing Folder 'Turkey'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'TVA'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'UI'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'Uniform Business Rules'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'Unions'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'united way'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'University relations'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'Wholesale'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'western governors'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'updates'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'valuation'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'Vermont'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'Virginia'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'Vision'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'vision and values'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'Washington office'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'Water'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'West Virginia'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Folder 'management conference'
17:06:22 Synchronizing Views
17:06:22 Synchronizing Forms
17:06:43 Done


Start Date: 12/25/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122511.txt


NG-PR-OPT 1084746
Larry May - 1084727 1084728 1084729

Thanks,

Errol, X5-8274


Attached please find, in WordPerfect format, the  Opening Brief of the
Indicated Electric Generators (I. 99-07-003).
?
If you have any questions about the format of  the attachment, please contact
me.? If you have questions about the brief  itself, please contact Mr Beach
at tomb@crossborderenergy.com or  510-649-9790.
?
Christa Goldblatt
Office  Manager
Crossborder Energy
christag@crossborderenergy.com
510-649-9790
"There  is hope, but not for us."? -- Franz Kafka
 - Initial Brief in Gas OIR (Final).wpd


Fyi
Robert Walls

-----Original Message-----
From: "Diomedes Christodoulou" <diomedes@cumulouscapital.com>@ENRON [NOTES:"Diomedes Christodoulou" <diomedes@cumulouscapital.com>@ENRON]
To: Walls Jr., Rob <Rob.Walls@ENRON.com>
Sent: Sun Oct 28 15:15:58 2001
Subject: RE: Enron payments

Rob,

I really appreciate your quick response and you calling back as soon as
you had some news on my contracts today.

I was taking an executive course all week at Wharton and I have to admit
I was not fully aware until reading the WSJ today of the full dimensions
of what Enron is going through.

I hope everything is well with you and I will give you a call on Monday
to catch up on everything.

All the best,

Diomedes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob.Walls@enron.com [mailto:Rob.Walls@enron.com]
Sent: 25 October 2001 17:58
To: diomedes@cumulouscapital.com
Subject: RE: Enron payments

D -

Thanks for the note.  With all due respect, I don't think things have
ever
been like this at Enron.  In any event, the company owes you a response
and
I'll do my best to find out what's going on.

Thanks.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Diomedes Christodoulou" <diomedes@cumulouscapital.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:40 PM
   To:     Walls Jr., Rob
   Cc:     jim.derrick@enron.com
   Subject:  RE: Enron payments

   Rob,

   Thanks. I am copying Jim on the entire exchange.

   I realize things are hectic at Enron but they have been for some time
   now and my payments can no longer be delayed. I think no one wants to
   assume responsibility for this and that's why I am writing to you and
   Jim because the delay is really reaching break point from my
standpoint.
   These are contractually agreed upon payments and they are not days or
   weeks late but MANY MONTHS late. I really need to receive the
payments
   in a matter of days.

   All the best and look forward to hearing from you.

   Diomedes.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Rob.Walls@enron.com [mailto:Rob.Walls@enron.com]
   Sent: 25 October 2001 17:05
   To: diomedes@cumulouscapital.com
   Subject: RE: Enron payments

   Dio -

   I think Jim's email address is jim.derrick@enron.com.  I haven't
heard
   back
   from Mary Joyce on any of this.  In fairness to her, things are a
little
   hectic over here right now.  Thanks.

   Rob

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Diomedes Christodoulou"
<diomedes@cumulouscapital.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:00 PM
      To:     Walls Jr., Rob
      Subject:  FW: Enron payments

      Rob,

      I've not been able to follow this to Jim ?I must be misspelling
his
      name. Can you please do so and also send me his email address?

      Thanks,

      Diomedes.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Diomedes Christodoulou [mailto:diomedes@cumulouscapital.com]
      Sent: 24 October 200118:21
      To: 'jim.dereck@enron.com'; 'rob.walls@enron.com'
      Subject: FW: Enron payments

      Jim and Rob,

      I hope you are both doing well. I realize that you must both be
      extremely busy with other more important issues but I find myself
in
   a
      position that I HAVE to raise the issue described in the email
below
   to
      your direct attention. The email is self explanatory but the
bottom
   line
      is that not only has Enron failed to make payments that are due to
me
      and to one of my companies for MONTHS now but  the company is not
   even
      responding to my requests for information.

      I would highly appreciate it if you advised me on the best way to
   handle
      this, i.e WHO do I need to talk to who has the decision authority
to
      make the payments and give me answers. I stress once more that the
      unjustified delays by Enron in making these payments is already
   causing
      me serious  problems and potential losses.

      I look forward to your response.

      Thanks and hope to see you soon.

      Diomedes.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Diomedes Christodoulou [mailto:diomedes@cumulouscapital.com]
      Sent: 20 October 200118:03
      To: 'mary.joyce@enron.com'
      Cc: 'John.Novak@enron.com'
      Subject: Enron payments

      Mary Joyce,

      I hope all is well with you.

      I am contacting you regarding a number of late payments by Enron
   which
      have now become urgent from my standpoint. These payments refer to
      contractual obligations between ECI (one of my affiliate
companies)
   and
      Enron and to the Employment Contract between Enron and myself. The
      payments have been invoiced and they are months late now.

      After questioning John Novak about the status of these payments
   (after
      leaving Enron I was told by Rob Walls to send all invoices related
to
      the ECI and to my agreement with Enron to John Novak in Enron
South
      America) I received a voice mail from Pam Buttler, who I believe
   works
      with you, informing me that I would have to wait until early
   November,
      maybe even until late November as the "changes in management at
Enron
      require that all contracts be reviewed by the Compensation
Committee
      which would convene in early or late November".

      As soon as I received this message last Wednesday I left a message
   with
      Pam and also a voice mail with you and I subsequently left two
   messages
      with your assistant asking you to contact me urgently regarding
this
      very serious matter but as I have not heard from you I am writing
   this
      email to make sure that my position is clear.

      These payments are due by Enron based on existing contracts and I
see
   no
      reason why I have to wait for a review by an internal Compensation
      Committee. These payments are already significantly late and I
have
   been
      extremely patient with continuous delays in payments due to me by
   Enron
      up to now. Moreover I have repeatedly let Enron know that I am in
the
      process of closing a transaction which depends on receiving these
      payments, otherwise I would incur costs by unwinding other
positions
      that I have. I need these payments to be made no later than
   Wednesday,
      October 24.

      Please inform me of Enron's intents so that I can take all the
      appropriate steps to enforce my contractual rights.

      I look forward to hearing from you,

      Regards,

      Diomedes Christodoulou.

**********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
affiliate
   and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of
   the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure
   by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient
   (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
sender
   or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
and
   delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
   hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
   create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
   Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
other
   party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract
by
   estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.

**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 05/17/99 02:07 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Smith, Charles" <Charles.Smith@alcoa.com>
05/17/99 01:48 PM

To: "Todd, Billy" <Billy.Todd@alcoa.com>, "'bettye'" <langham@texas.net>,
"Banks, Charlie W." <Charlie.Banks@alcoa.com>, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT,
"Burkhardt, Glenn J." <Glenn.Burkhardt@alcoa.com>, "'doris marie'"
<dsmith8555@aol.com>, "'jen'" <jennifer.hefti@oag.state.tx.us>, "Manas, Mark"
<Mark.Manas@alcoa.com>, "'ROY D.'" <flintman101@yahoo.com>, "Biggs, Sandy L.
(ISC at Alcoa)" <Sandy.Biggs@alcoa.com>, "'termite'" <termite@hot1.net>,
"Zboril, Terry L." <Terry.Zboril@alcoa.com>, "Alvarez, Theresa M."
<Theresa.Alvarez@alcoa.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Get em with Scripture

>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>
>>
>> > > > Subject: Get em with scripture
>> > > >
>> > > > This lady surprised a burglar in her kitchen.  He was all loaded
>> down
>> > > > with the things he was going to steal.  She had no weapon and was
>> all
>> > > > alone.  The only thing that she could think to do was quote
>> scripture.
>> > > > So,  she holds up a hand and says:  "ACTS 2:38!!!"
>> > > >
>> > > > The burglar quakes in fear and then freezes to the point that she
>> is
>> > > > able to get to the phone and call 911 for the cops.  When the cops
>> > > > arrive, the burglar is still frozen in place.  They are very much
>> > > > surprised
>> > > > that a woman alone with no weapon could do this.  One of them
>> > > > asked the lady: "How did you do this?"
>> > > >
>> > > > The woman replied: "I quoted scripture."
>> > > >
>> > > > The cop turned the burglar:  "What was it about the scripture that
>> had
>> > > > such an effect on you?"
>> > > >
>> > > > The burglar replied: "Scripture!  What scripture?  I thought she
>> said
>> > > > she had an ax and two 38's."
>
>
>
>
>


It is Carlos' territory.  Please review for compliance  with this month's
rules.

Thanks,

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           05/14/2001 01:36 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Greene Option - Pontiac Site

Kay and Carlos,

Is Illinois Carlos' state?  I will be working on this.

Kathleen

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 05/14/2001
01:34 PM ---------------------------

Rusty Stevens
05/14/2001 01:29 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Greene Option - Pontiac Site

Kathleen,

I have spoken with Mr. Greene's attorney - Ed Legner - and let him know that
his minor suggested changes for the one year extension of the Pontiac site
option were acceptable.  I indicated that we would send out originals for
review and execution this week.

The procedure we agreed to was as follows:

We will send originals to Ed Legner in Pontiac for his review and initials.
He will forward to Dick Greene in Florida for execution.
Dick will sign and send to us
We execute and return their original along with the the two checks in the
amount of $5000 each - one for exercise of the six month extension, and the
other for making our requested changes for turbopark compliance and for
granting an additional 12 month extension option at the end of this year.

I would like to get this inked as soon as possible in order to ensure the
viability of the Pontiac site for a 2003 COD.


All,

We are scheduling Interviews for new candidates to the Trading Track, next Wedesday 30th May.     I am looking for volunteers to particpate in this event.

Agenda:

Tuesday: 29th:		Dinner with five external candidates Tuesday night.

Wednesday 30th:

11.00 - 12.30		Office tour - Trading Floor/Gas Control Room - five external candidates
12.30 - 1.30 		Lunch with all 15 candidates (comination of internal and external).

I need 3 of you to attend dinner on the 29th, 2 of your to faciliate the office tour and give insight to the operations and would like for all of you to attend the lunch.

Pls advise on both at your earliest conveneince.

Rgds, Karen.


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 02:22
PM ---------------------------
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


geeez....
this Sunday and you're PATHETIC!!!!
LOLOL
p.s. - what happened to you last night??

From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/18/2001 09:54 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: LAST "CALL" for SECRET OPERATION: "Mara-time"

What day is here birthday?  Is it the 5th of May?


http://www.consultrci.com

*********************************************************************
Learn more about SCIENTECH's Mergers, Acquisitions, and Convergence in
the US Electric Industry InfoGrid at:
http://www.consultrci.com
*********************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, November 10, 2000
Public Service Company of New Mexico to Acquire the Electric Utility
Operations
of Western Resources
By: Jon T. Brock, Director, Strategic and Competitive Intelligence
===============================================================

Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) announced yesterday that it
intends to acquire the electric utility operations of Topeka, Kansas based
Western Resources (WR) in a tax-free stock-for-stock transaction.  The
deal will require that WR separate its non-utility assets from its regulated
utility business and spin it off to WR shareholders.

ANALYSIS:  In this day and age of a consolidating electric industry, strategic
combinations are becoming more commonplace.  This announcement took me
by surprise even though the signs were clearly marked for this type of
merger.  WR has had a tough time financially in recent years and has been
seeking a utility operations buyer for some time now.

WR busted up a planned merger between Kansas City based KCPL and UtiliCorp
United by attempting to acquire KCPL in 1996.  At the time WR share price
was above $30.  In 1997 WR share price soared to record highs of more than
$40.  WR attempted to acquire security company ADT but their bid failed.
They sold their interest in ADT for a $800 million profit.  This profit
"masked" a rate review by the Kansas Corporation Commission that at the
time was cutting WR rates by $75 million, reducing earnings by 75 cents
per share.

WR, who obviously had a strategic focus on security, used the profits from
the ADT sale to purchase 85 percent of Protection One, one of the fastest
growing companies in the monitored security business.  Protection One hit
some hard times soon after the purchase by WR and as a result, their stock
tumbled.  WR investors became nervous when state and federal regulators
began discussing terms of the KCPL merger that might not necessarily be
favorable to them.  As a result, some moved their money out of WR and by
1999, WR share price had tumbled to $16 to $17.  In January of this year,
KCPL determined that the share price of WR and the financial considerations
of the merger were not advantageous to KCPL shareholders and called off
the merger.

WR immediately split itself into two organizations (regulated utility
operations
and non-regulated business) with the intent of finding a buyer for the
regulated utility operations.  WR claimed in June of this year that 50
companies were being courted, including international companies, for the
utility operations assets of Kansas Power & Light (KPL) and Kansas Gas
and Electric (KGE).  Putting PNM on that list had not occurred to me.
But it does fit.

SCIENTECH interviewed Jeff Sterba, CEO of PNM, just weeks ago and asked
if the development of alliances, mergers, and acquisitions were a part
of the positive approach to PNM's strategy.  Jeff answered, "Very definitely.
Alliances focused on the things that are core to your business, and that
can bring a sustainable, competitive advantage are essential for us in
this industry.  The criticality of market channels can't be over-emphasized.
Once you have a good market channel, that doesn't mean that everything
you put through that market channel you have to do yourself, or you have
to own. You can expand that reach to customers by forming alliances.  There
are times when acquisitions can also be an important investment if it involves
something that is core to your business. So, both alliances and acquisitions
will be a part of PNM's future."

Just weeks later PNM is buying WR.  Utilizing my rear view mirror now I
see the existing similarities between the assets of WR and PNM.  They both
operate regulated utilities with a generation fuel mix (including nuclear).
They both have multi-commodity in electric and gas.  They both have wholesale
operations.  PNM actually has had a great year financially due in part
to a strong wholesale operation.  PNM net earnings for the nine months
ended Sept. 30, 2000 totaled $86.9 million, or $2.17 per share (diluted)
on total operating revenues of $1.15 billion, compared to earnings of $66.2
million, or $1.60 per share in the first three quarters of 1999.

PNM has adopted a "niche" strategy in the wholesale power market by developing
tailored wholesale power products for its customers.  While some of the
mega-traders in the wholesale market thrive on volume and a standard
commodity,
PNM differentiates itself by creating a tailored power product according
to the needs of the buyer.  PNM has found success in this niche segment
of a large wholesale market.

The merger deal is expected to take between 12 and 15 months to complete.
PNM will inherit approximately $2.9 billion in debt making the total value
of the deal worth $4.4 billion.  Fitch has placed its securities ratings
of PNM on Rating Watch Negative and WR on Rating Watch Evolving.  Fitch
plans to meet with PNM management soon in order to assess the full impact
of the merger.  Apparently some regulatory concern exists in Kansas where
deregulation has not occurred and where some rate inconsistencies exist
between Wichita and Topeka.  This may result in a rate case.  It should
also be noted that Wichita, Kansas currently has an ongoing effort to takeover
(municipalize) the electric system from Western Resources within its city
limits because of the rate disparity between Wichita and Topeka.  Wichita
has about 170,000 power customers -- roughly a fourth of all the customers
served by Western Resources. They represent more than $370 million of KGE's
$580 million in revenues.

PNM will increase its debt but is committed to reducing that debt and has
demonstrated its ability to do so.  PNM has decreased its debt-to-capital
ratio from 72 percent to less than 55 percent in the last seven years.
The headquarters will be based in Albuquerque, NM and the chairman, president,
and chief executive officer will be Jeff Sterba.

===============================================================
Search SCIENTECH's PowerHitter archive to read about our interview with
Jeff Sterba, Chairman, President, and CEO of The Public Service Company
of New Mexico at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/PowerHitter
==============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Jon T. Brock
Director, Strategic and Competitive Intelligence
jbrock@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
jbrock@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


Please overnight an ISDA draft to this customer.

Thanks
Brant


********************[ A D V E R T I S E M E N T ]****************
Is your online broker built to trade? Datek Online's advanced
technology gives you fast executions, real time quotes and
immediate portfolio updates. For a limited-time offer, go to
http://www.datek.com/sivy/  Datek Online. Member NASD/SIPC.
*****************************************************************
SIVY ON STOCKS from money.com
December 6, 2000

Banks hitting bottom

Earnings disappointments and fears about bad loans have triggered a new
round of selloffs for financials like Bank of America and Chase Manhattan.
But it looks as though the worst is over.

By Michael Sivy

Bank of America's announcement on Wednesday afternoon that fourth-quarter
profits would fall substantially short of expectations sent major bank
stocks into a tailspin. B of A [BAC] closed the day down nearly 8 percent,
while Chase [CMB] dropped 3 percent. These declines are only the latest bad
news for the commercial banking sector, which has been battered all year.
In fact, both B of A and Chase are down by more than 20 percent since the
start of the year.

I can't say I anticipated the sell-off, since I bought Bank of America more
than 15 percent above its current price. Nonetheless, there's nothing
surprising about banks reporting bad numbers after a year of high interest
rates and six months of slowing economic growth.

Traders also got caught off guard by B of A's news. They were heavy buyers
of bank stocks Tuesday after Alan Greenspan addressed a conference of
bankers in New York City. The Federal Reserve chairman said "the pace of
economic activity has moderated appreciably." He added that the Fed now has
to be more attentive to the risk that the economy might slow too much. Many
economists read into those comments that the Fed will formally change its
stance in favor of lowering interest rates at its Dec. 19 meeting, and
actually cut them early next year.

Such news ought to be bullish for bank stocks. So why are they still
falling? Basically, they've virtually acknowledged that they'll report
sub-par earnings and higher loan losses this quarter and probably next.
Share prices could dip a bit more as those weak results get reported. But
most of that bad news is history -- from here on out, the trends will be
getting better, not worse.

Bank of America, which merged with NationsBank in 1998, is the largest U.S.
bank. Its stock is currently down to a paltry $38, just $2 above the
52-week low. For 2001, B of A should report earnings of about $5 a share,
just a single-digit gain from estimated 2000 results. Over the next five
years, however, analysts think the bank could grow earnings by about 10
percent annually. Including the 5 percent-plus dividend yield, that's quite
a generous return for shares that are trading at only eight times earnings.

Chase Manhattan presents a similar case. The bank, which is acquiring J.P.
Morgan, has been knocked down in anticipation of bad fourth-quarter
results. Chase is a major lender to troubled Xerox, for example, so that
could be a source of loan losses. Nonetheless, the banking giant offers 11
percent projected long-term earnings growth and a 3 percent dividend yield.
With a P/E of just over 10 times next year's estimated earnings, Chase
looks like a compelling buy as well.

=======================
CHAT TRANSCRIPTS
MONEY's Michael Sivy identifies sectors and stocks that possess
true value in a rocky market.
http://www.money.com/chat/2000/001204.html

Tech Investor David Futrelle discusses the current state of the
tech market and the outlook for various sectors.
http://www.money.com/chat/2000/001201.html
=======================

###

Post your comments on Michael's column at:
http://www.money.com/depts/investing/sivy/index.html

To subscribe or unsubscribe to Sivy on Stocks, go to:
http://www.money.com/email/

Earning Releases and Calls
For the latest corporate earnings releases and online conference
calls click on: http://money.ccbn.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Special Internet Offer!!!

Sign up for a RISK-FREE issue of MONEY MAGAZINE at
http://www.money.com/subscribe2

Or if you prefer call our toll-free number 1-800-544-4594

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

We may, from time to time, contact you with offers for Time Inc.
products and services which we think may be of interest to you.
If you would prefer us not to contact you in this manner, AND
YOU DID NOT INDICATE THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP
for the Sivy on Stocks online newsletter or any other Time Inc.
online newsletters, please let us know by sending us an e-mail
at <no_solicit@money.com>.

Additionally, from time to time we may provide your e-mail
address to carefully chosen companies whose offers we think may
be of interest to you.  If you would prefer us not use your
e-mail address in this manner, AND YOU DID NOT INDICATE
THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP for the Sivy on Stocks online
newsletter or any other Time Inc. online newsletter, please let
us know by e-mailing us at <no_transfer@money.com>.