Enron has been increasing security at its facilities around the world.  Some of the changes took effect immediately (e.g. additional security personnel) and some are phasing in.  While not all of the changes will be visible, there are a few that will have an impact on everyday activities.  In all the steps we take and recommendations we make, we will be making our facilities and systems more secure and endeavoring to increase your sense of security, while doing our best to minimize disruption to our day-to-day business.

Primary responsibility for Enron Corp. Security resides in our business controls organization.  You can contact this organization through their website (<http://home.enron.com/security>), by phone (713-345-2804), or by email (CorporateSecurity@enron.com <mailto:CorporateSecurity@enron.com>).  John Brindle, Senior Director, Business Controls, leads this organization.  Please feel free to provide John and his team with your comments and questions, or to report security threats.

We have two areas to update you on:  changes in the access procedures for the Enron Center Campus in Houston and changes to our travel advisory.

Access to the Enron Center

Over the next few days, the following access control procedures will be instituted at the Enron Center (and other facilities where practical):

?	As employees swipe their badges at the card readers to enter the Enron Center, a guard will match the photo on the badge to the bearer.

?	Employees and contractors who forget their badges must present a valid picture ID to obtain access to the Enron Center (U.S. driver's license, U.S. or foreign passport, or some form of U.S. federal, state or local identification).

?	Visitors to the Enron Center must produce a valid photo ID when signing in at the lobby reception desk and must completely fill out the visitor card.  Adult visitors without a valid photo ID (U.S. driver's license, U.S. or foreign passport, or some form of U.S. federal, state or local identification) will not be allowed access to the Enron Center.

?	Visitors to Enron facilities must be escorted by an Enron employee or badged contractor at all times.

?	Visitors to the Enron Center will be met in the lobby by an Enron employee or badged contractor, signed into a visitor's log at the lobby reception area by the employee or badged contractor, and escorted to their appointment.  At the conclusion of the appointment, the visitor will be escorted to the lobby by an employee or badged contractor, the visitor badge collected, and the visitor signed out in the log at the plaza reception area by the escorting employee or badged contractor.

?	Employees are also being asked to participate in the security of their workplace by following these guidelines; report suspicious activity to Security (phone 3-6300), do not open secured doors for individuals unknown to you or hold doors open, allowing "tail gating" by others.

These will be the first in a series of new security procedures to be instituted at Enron.  We ask that all employees be patient during congested times in the lobby.  As we proceed and obtain increased guard personnel and equipment, we expect the inconvenience to decrease.  We hope you understand these measures are being instituted for the security of all our employees.

Travel Advisory Update

With the beginning of retaliatory strikes, we have two important recommendations:

?	While the retaliatory strikes are ongoing, corporate security recommends that travel through or to the Middle East be avoided.  We continue to strongly recommend that all travel during this time to Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Georgia, and the Kyrgyz Republic be canceled.  In addition, we recommend that planned travel to Egypt, Israel, Gaza/West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Algeria be very carefully considered.

?	For non-U.S. citizens traveling in the United States, corporate security recommends that you carry documentation.  There have been several recent reports of non-U.S. citizens who reside in the United States being questioned and asked for documentation when boarding U.S. domestic flights. As a result, we suggest that all non-U.S. citizens who currently reside in the United States - and who do not have Permanent Resident Alien status - carry their passport, Form I-94 and Form I-797 at all times.  We would also suggest that Permanent Resident Aliens carry their Permanent Resident (Green) Card as proof of their status as a precautionary measure.  It appears that Immigration Officials may be applying a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act that requires individuals over the age of 18 to carry his/her "registration" documentation with them at all times. This can include a Permanent Resident Card, Form I-94 card, Employment Authorization Card, Border Crossing Card, or a Temporary Resident Card. Immigration Officials have not historically been asking domestic travelers for "registration" documentation, but in light of the heightened security measures and current atmosphere, it would be best to be prepared with all of your documentation proving your current lawful status.

We will keep you apprised of new information and developments on the Corporate Security website and by e-mail, as appropriate.


Please quickly review the attached document for inclusion in the contract
submittal to Hanover Measurement Services.

Regards,
Chris Sonneborn


You're so right about the Dave deal.  Not sure what I'm going to do.  We
communicate pretty well so maybe I'll just talk to him about it.
That's is so sad about Angela.  I know you mut be feeling so bad about not
being with her but she understands that you can't right now.  She has got
your Mom and Danno and Jay - She'll be ok.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:02 AM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE:

Letting him stir is good in some ways but guys actually tend to like a lack
of clarity in relationships as it gives them more leeway.  However, I don't
really know the dynamic in your relationship at all.

So Angela and I made up from our huge saturday morning fight before I left
on Sunday and she cried like a baby when i left.  I feel so bad leaving
her. She is really broken hearted right now.


Do we still have any activity or imbalances on the following Columbia Energy
Services contracts

k#
8G0a61
8g0a62
8g0a63
8g1064
8t0a61
8t0a62
8t1063
8t1064


***Do not reply to this email.  UPS and ENRON CORP will not receive your reply.

At the request of ENRON CORP, this notice confirms the following shipment has been sent.

Important Delivery Information
_______________________________________________________________

Scheduled Delivery: 21-March-2002

Shipment Detail
_______________________________________________________________

Ship To:

Molly Sample
EOTT Energy Partners, LP
One Briar Lake, Suite 400
2000 West Sam Houston Parkway South
HOUSTON
TX
77042
US

Number of Packages:   1
UPS Service:   Next Day Air
Shipment Type:   Letter

Tracking Number:   1Z7261100194491366
Reference Number 1:   105465

You can track your shipment at any time from the following URL:
http://wwwapps.ups.com/ietracking/tracking.cgi?tracknum=1Z7261100194491366&IATA=us&Lang=eng

Or visit http://www.ups.com/tracking/tracking.html on the Internet.
_______________________________________________________________

This email contains proprietary information and may be confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please delete it immediately.

This email was automatically generated by UPS email services at the Shipper's request.  Any reply to this email will not be received by UPS or Shipper.  Please contact the Shipper directly if you have questions regarding the referenced shipment or you wish to discontinue this notification service.

___DDBDDBEIUJUJ___


FYI

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490
----- Forwarded by Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT on 09/18/2000 11:29 AM -----

	Ranabir Dutt@ENRON
	09/18/2000 09:55 AM

		 To: Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Katie Stowers/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Presentation for Today's meeting - manlove

Attached is the presentation that we will go over @ today's meeting.  If
there things that need to added/corrected give me a call (35274) or lets talk
about it at todays meeting.

Ranabir


Attached is a memo which analyses in detail the P&L from the Eastern and
Sutton Bridge spread options book as recorded in the summary DPR for the
month of April.

Please let me know if this is useful or not and what you like, don't like it
or what you want added for the future.

Regards James


Mr. Lay,

A group of former DSG employees have tried to receive information about the status of our DSG 401k's.  We were promised that our accounts would be super-vested and then moved to Enron's 401k plan.  We expected this change to take at the most 6 months.  It has been two years...  We were told on several occasions that our accounts had been super-vested and we were waiting on Enron to move the accounts.  We are now being told that our AUL accounts can not be moved and in fact are frozen.  Marla Barnard was our HR representative at the time of the acquisition.  She has directed my questions to Mike Rath in Benefits, who has never responded.  Can someone please explain why the super-vesting and moving of the funds did not occur, the rules associated with the account freeze and why we are not receiving our statements from AUL?

Debbie Beavers
(713)345-6363
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnard, Marla
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:24 PM
To:	Rath, Mikie
Cc:	Beavers, Debbie
Subject:	FW: 401k from DSG

Mikie, can you please respond to Debbie's question below?  thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beavers, Debbie
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:05 PM
To:	Barnard, Marla
Subject:	RE: 401k from DSG

I did not receive any info from Mikie Rath.  Does this mean that I can not borrow from my AUL 401k?  The majority of my money (11 years) came from Amoco not DSG.  Does that matter?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnard, Marla
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:34 PM
To:	Beavers, Debbie
Subject:	RE: 401k from DSG

Debbie, I forwarded this message to Mikie Rath in benefits - did you get a response?  If not, I do have some info. I can provide, but she would need to assist you with any particular details.  Please see below - I just learned recently that it does not appear much of this info. was communicated to DSG employees after the acquisition.

1- The assets contained within the DSG 401(k) plan cannot be transferred to the Enron plan because the plan was never authorized by the IRS.

2- Prior DSG employees cannot transfer funds out of the AUL 401(k) into a self directed IRA, because Enron purchased the assets of DSG. Therefore termination applies to Enron employment, not employment by DSG in regards to transfer of said assets to a self directed account.

3- The DSG plan with AUL will remain intact and Enron will pay all associated administrative fees until all employees represented by the plan are no longer in employed by Enron

	4- Since the plan is frozen, vesting service should continue to accrue as long as the employee remains with Enron.  Only if the plan is terminated does "super vesting" occur.  The purchase agreement may have assumed that the plan was going to be terminated which could explain that language.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beavers, Debbie
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:34 AM
To:	Barnard, Marla
Subject:	401k from DSG

 Marla  ,

I am a former employee of DSG.  We were purchased by Enron, Dec. of  1999 .  We were promised that our 401K's would be moved to Enron's 401k plan.  This has never happened.  I no longer receive AUL (401k company) statements.  AUL claims that it sends the statements to the administrator of the plan at Enron.  I would really like to transfer my money to Enron's 401k or at least receive a statement of my account at AUL.

Thanks!
Debbie Beavers
(713) 345- 6363


Lucy,
 I am going to be in Seguin this Saturday through Monday.  We can talk about
a unit for Wade then.  I will call the bank again today to resolve
authorization on the account.  Lets keep the office open until noon on
Memorial day.

Philllip


Setting up oil n products options book.  Nice people...alot of ex enron. It
feels very much like enron used to be b4 we grew out of control.  But there
is a guy here with equally bad shirt taste as Marcello!!
 Seems a shame mark wright and a few others went to williams and that isn't
lookin too rosie.    I actually found out about enron's demise when i was
away in honeymoon, (great wedding present!!)  but still sounds like the best
place to be considering everyone else was in the pub!!
Will the UBS job b in Houston back in london?
Well keep in touch and if ur in london and fancy a beer let me know.
take care
Jonesy

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Louise.Kitchen@enron.com [SMTP:Louise.Kitchen@enron.com]
> Sent:	04 February 2002 01:57
> To:	Mark.Jones@rwetrading.com
> Subject:	RE: Hello
>
> Hello
>
> Glad you got yourself sorted with a new job.  Things here are getting
> better - we have nearly closed with UBS, so I hope to have a new job next
> week.  Still in Houston.
>
> Are you trading - if so what?
>
> Take care
>
> Louise
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   Mark.Jones@rwetrading.com@ENRON
>    Sent:   Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:08 AM
>    To:     Kitchen, Louise
>    Subject:  Hello
>
>    Louise,
>    How r u doing?  Are you still in Houston? Just a quick note to say
> hello
>    really
>    Good luck
>    Jonesy
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    Erleben Sie die neue RWE Online-Welt unter http://www.rwe.com
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
> are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
> its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Revised draft.  Da Bulls toner is low, so the draft doesn't look good, and I
don't know where the others print.  Guess I could just listen for it...


Thanks Jeff.  Sorry for the delay.  Lots of internal conversations have
been required to get everyone lined up.

David

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com on 03/15/2001 12:41:57 PM

To:   David_Teece@LECG.com
cc:   jdasovic@enron.com, mmanly@newpower.com, pbray@newpower.com

Subject:  Re: Electricity Deregulation

David:
Thanks so much.  I'd almost given up hope.  I will be distributing the
proposal immediately and attempting to garner support industry-wide, across
the nation.  Can't make any promises of support, but will be working hard
to try to bring people together.  I'll be in touch soon.  Don't hesitate to
contact me to discuss it further.  415.782.7822.

Best,
Jeff


Kevin

Give me a call on this one.


Hi Charlotte,

We are going to the Astro's game tonight, so it would be very easy for one of
us (probably Neil) to pick Michael up at your place, probably after 630.  Is
that ok with you?

Thanks,

Kay


The EWS Final PRC meeting will be held on July 10 at the St. Regis Hotel, Colonnade Room from 8:00 am until 4:00 pm.  Following the PRC meeting, we will have a social hour in the room adjacent to the Colonnade Room, from 4:00-6:00pm.

The purpose of the meeting is to review each of the following EWS business units' distribution curves,  review promotion nominations to Director and Sr. Director, and  finalize the preranking of Vice Presidents in preparation for the final Enron-wide PRC meeting on July 23.  Representatives from the Enron-wide PRC Committee will attend this part of the meeting as observers.

The business units included in the meeting are:

Enron Americas
Enron Global Markets
Enron Industrial Markets
Enron Networks
Enron Global Assets and Services
Enron Engineering and Operational Services

Attached is a complete agenda for the meeting.

Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at X36628.

Sheila


Any recommendations?

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2001
10:27 AM ---------------------------

"Dennis Ray" <djray@engr.wisc.edu> on 03/27/2001 04:46:44 PM
To: "Vince Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: PSERC Industrial Advisory Board Meeting Invitation

Mr. Kaminski,

Greetings. Bob Thomas, Shmuel Oren and I invite you to attend the Power
Systems Engineering Research Center's upcoming Industrial Advisory Board
meeting in Oak Brook, IL. It will be held on May 31 - June 1.

As you know from Lance and Alex, this is an opportunity to meet university
researchers and industrial members of PSERC. The meeting also has
presentations on PSERC activities and research projects, PSERC business
discussions, current topic discussions, and a tutorial. Our current topics
discussion will be on ISO/RTO issues, and will involve executives from
several ISOs in dialog with university researchers.

Please let me know if you have any questions. We hope to see you there so
that we can talk about any questions you might have about PSERC.

Dennis Ray, Ph.D.
Executive Director
Power Systems Engineering Research Center
608-265-3808

 - Directions.doc
 - IAB_Meeting_May2001.doc
 - IAB_Registration_Form.doc
 - PSERC Members.doc


Hey Sparky!  FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2000 06:32
AM ---------------------------

Scott Goodell@ENRON
04/10/2000 03:45 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, achin@colcnr.com @ ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: East Tennessee (Receipts --Virginia--Dickenson County #2) and
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. - Zone 5 - Cook School Road Receiving Station

For the Nora Gas, we historically priced it as follows...

TGP LA Index (March 00) 2.56 less
 Fuel   2.22%
 Commodity  .0108
 Demand  .38
 Total Purchase Price 2.11 at Nora.

Chris Germany@ECT
04/10/2000 02:31 PM
To: Sandra Dial/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: East Tennessee (Receipts --Virginia--Dickenson County #2) and
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. - Zone 5 - Cook School Road Receiving Station

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2000 02:31
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
04/10/2000 02:24 PM
To: achin@colcnr.com @ ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: East Tennessee (Receipts --Virginia--Dickenson County #2) and
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. - Zone 5 - Cook School Road Receiving Station

Here is the transport data for the Cook School Road

  March  April
CNG Index $2.79  $3.06

Demand $.1000  $.0400
Comm  $.0521  $.0521
Fuel  1.28%  1.28%

Receipt Price $2.6029  $2.9294

Let me know what you come up with.

Thanks

achin@colcnr.com on 04/10/2000 11:20:45 AM
To: Chris.Germany%enron.com@colcnr.com
cc:
Subject: Re: East Tennessee (Receipts --Virginia--Dickenson County #2) and
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. - Zone 5 - Cook School Road Receiving Station

304-353-5128


Morris:

Mirant has documents with ECC.

Thanks!

Marie


Dear David:  I'm assisting Gerald Nemec in HPL's Tx Railroad Commission
(TxRRC) P-5 filing.  The TxRRC's files indicate that we have 2 inactive wells
at Bammel, Field No. 05388270.  The two wells are:

Pyles, Anna Unit, Lease/ID 04631 (1 well)
Ehrhardt, John, Lease/ID 162241 (12 wells)

If these wells are inactive but not plugged, we will need to obtain bonds for
these wells.  Also, new TxRRC rules state that we must perform an "H-15 test"
on these wells now.

Please tell me the status of these wells.  If they are plugged and abandoned,
our compliance requirements may change.  If not, can you help us make sure
that an "H-15 test" is performed and send me such proof so that I can satisfy
the TxRRC requirements?

Thanks in advance for your help, and please call me with questions or
comments.

Best wishes,
Mary

Mary C. Ogden
Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services/Enron Americas/Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3876d
Houston, TX  77002-7361
Phone:  713-853-7796
Fax:  713-646-3490
Mary.Ogden@enron.com


Definitely clever!  I wish that I had thought of the changing the clock thing
when the girls were younger and had slumber parties.

I didn't know that there were computer games that work on higher level math
skills.  I will definitely look into that for Meagan.

I wish that we could meet for lunch.  Keep me posted on Cara  -- I have
called her a little more frequently lately in hopes that she would spill the
beans, but no movement on that yet!

I think that next week we will know the schedule of games when Meagan will be
dancing.  She did not make the dance for the first try-out.  It was jazz;
not her strong suit.  But she did make the dances for the next two try-outs:
a kick rountine and a pom routine.  There are two more try outs -- one more
for kick and one more for pom. Hopefully she will make both.  Each routines
is danced at two games -- one at home and one away.  So if she makes the next
two dances, then she will be in 8 out of 10 dances for the football season.
I think that she would feel pretty good about that.  The last two try-outs
will be next week.  I will keep you posted.

Have a great weekend.  Love, Sally

"Cindy White" <cwhite@viviance.com> on 08/11/2000 12:02:42 PM
To: <Sally.Beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: slumber party

Sally,

Wish we could meet downtown for lunch--if only we weren't in different
downtown!

Bummer about Meagan--I agree that physics and precalc would be a killer.
You've probably looked into this but there are some great computer
"games/drills" for math.  Brigeda does the early ones but there are some for
the heavy duty stuff as well...

Amanda must have aced that lock/locker and changing classes thing if she
loves her classes...

Brigeda doesn't start until the 21st.  It is always a strange week when all
the other kids (and her best friend) is in school--kind of waiting week but
we should be getting ready for her party.

GREAT IDEA:  I'm going to change the clocks in my house the night of the
slumber party--to 2 hour ahead.  So they can have their midnight swim and
snack (at 10pm!).  I don't know whether this makes me a creepy or clever
mom...

Let me know when you get Meagan's football schedule...Brigeda has been
moaning about wishing she was in Houston since we left...

Today is Cara's appt with the gyn/ob--maybe an announcement will be
forthcoming.

I'm meeting a guy I took my web certification classes with on Monday.  He
owns a design firm in Georgetown and has some freelance work.  It would be
great to be able to accelerate our return to solvency!

Talk to you soon...

Cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: Sally.Beck@enron.com [mailto:Sally.Beck@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 11:38 AM
To: cwhite@viviance.com
Subject: Re: slumber party

That was always one of my favorites!  The old Parent Trap is always great
too,  I wish that I could be there. I know that Brigeda must be excited
about the slumber party.  When does she start school?  Today is day #2 for
the girls --Amanda loves her classes.  Meagan thought that the first day
"sucked".  I have been on the phone with her counselor and assistant
principal this morning trying to undo a bad decision that she made on her
class selection.  Despite annual struggles with algebra and geometry, she
signed up for both Physics and Pre-Calc!!!   I don't know what she was
thinking!!  Amazingly, for a school as large as Klein, I was persuasive
enough with the assistant principal that they will ignore the July 22
deadline for changing your schedule and they will let her drop Physics and
add a study hall.  She still will take Pre-Calc, but she is in a regulars
class that will be a review of Algebra II during the first semester, which
is probably exactly what she needs.  I was prepared to go all the way to
the school board if necessary to get her a schedule that makes sense, but
luckily I didn't have to go that far.

Hope that you have a good weekend!  Love, sally

"Cindy White" <cwhite@viviance.com> on 08/09/2000 11:35:19 AM

To:   "Sally" <sally.beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  slumber party

Sally (and yes, I did check thrice to make sure I had the right Sally!),

Thought I'd let you know that I found a rental of IN SEARCH OF THE
CASTAWAYS.  Thought it might be good for the slumber party--we've got a
tropical island theme going....

Cindy


fyi, more on David Merrill's work product, as well as being a regulatory
issue of interest.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 05/11/2000
11:17 ---------------------------

David Merrill@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/11/2000 12:02
To: Robbi Rossi@EES, Michelle Hicks@Enron Communications,
<donald_lassere@enron.net>, Anthony Duenner@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS,
<bill_white@enron.net>
cc: Wayne Gardner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mark
Schroeder@ECT, <xi_xi@enron.net>, <roger_estrada@enron.net>, Jae-Moo
Lee@ENRON, Craig Clark@Enron Communications, Stephen D
Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Korea: Regulatory Impediment to Bandwidth Trading / Action Plan

Our regulatory review team in Korea this week has identified a major
regulatory
 impediment to bandwidth trading in Korea.   This describes the problem and
 outlines a draft strategy to deal with it, with actions shown in blue.

Problem:

It appears that under the Telecommunications Business Law (as interpreted by
the
Korea Communications Commission in a recent ruling against MCI), a Specific
Services
Provider Type 1 (which we want to be) cannot resell International Private
Leased Circuits
wholesale.   Only a Facilities Based provider (Network Services Provider) can
do resale of
International Leased Lines under the current law.  We do not want to be a
Network Services Provider because an NSP can not exceed 49% foreign ownership
and has immense responsibilities.

Factual Background:

We want to be a specific services provider Type 1 (reseller with facilities
such
as servers and switches).  Under the law as interpreted in the recent ruling,
however, SSPs:

    -  can buy or lease international lines only from NSPs.
    -  cannot sell International Private Leased Circuits to other SSPs,
         to Value-Added Service Providers (VSPs), or to ISPs.
    -  can sell international capacity only to end users, not to other
wholesalers.

The recent ruling came about when MCI (not a Network Service Provider) leased
international lines from an NSP in Korea and resold them to Goldman Sachs for
traffic
to Hong Kong.    Korea Telecom brought  a case against MCI to the Korea
Communications
Council (KCC) for decision.   Kim and Chang, our Enron energy lawyers in
Korea, handled
the case (they did not disclose to us that MCI was the client).

The KCC ruled  for KT and against MCI.   I'm not sure yet why Goldman Sachs
was
treated as a wholesaler and not an end user which should have been legal.  At
this point, however,
the situation is that if a foreign company tried to resell IPLCs wholesale,
any local NSP could bring a
complaint to the KCC,  and would run the regulatory risk of being forced to
cease.
(The sources for this conclusion are Kim and Chang, the Ministry of Info and
Communications,
and the Korea Information Society Institute, a telecom policy think tank for
the Ministry.)

Options:

(1)  Change the law.   A revision of the law is drafted but does not fix this
and changes
      are closed for this year.  Amendments on the floor of Parliament are
impossible in Korea.
      For a change in law, we would have to try in summer 2001 to get a
change in early 2002.
      Change by Presidential Decree is also possible but is overkill.   Not
feasible.

(2)  Get a new interpretation from the Korea Communications Council that says
what we
       plan to do in Korea in bandwidth is OK.

             We would ask Kim and Chang to present our proposed plans to the
KCC
             before we enter the bandwidth trading (BWT) market.  We would
describe
             it in a way that is sufficiently different from the MCI case.
Jae Moo made
             this suggestion.

              Pro:  If we get a favorable ruling we are in business.  We do
not have money
                      at risk unless the regulatory road is clear.

              Con:  an unfavorable ruling slams the door specifically on us.

              Recommended Steps:

                    (1)   We should explore this option with Kim and Chang.

                    Robbi or Michelle:  if you agree, please contact Kim and
Chang to discuss this
                    and authorize start of this work if they agree with this
approach.   I will work with
                    you to develop the scope of work and can operate with Kim
and Chang during the
                    work as necessary.

                    (2)  We will contact MCI to get more facts on their case
including whether
                    they were selling to a wholesaler who sold to Goldman or
directly to Goldman.
                    We can say the Ministry mentioned their case.  We should
probably not be thinking
                    about joint action with MCI at this point as we want to
say our case is different if we
                    can.   I will explore facts with an MCI contact in Tokyo
and Craig will do same
                    in Singapore.

(3)  Redefine where a sale of IPLCs takes place to have it not be in Korea.
Would
      need legal/commercial creative analysis.   Possible but uncertain
option.

(4)  Redefine the product so as not to be a re-sale:   If we buy capacity and
chop it up
      into smaller pieces or alter it before we sell it, maybe we are not
re-selling what we
      bought.  But we may still have a problem if the new product is sold to
wholesalers.

               Let's explore 3 and 4 above and similar ideas in a conference
call.
               Robbi, can you set up a call on this with me, Donald,
you/Michelle,
               Wayne Gardner, Craig Clark, Roger Estrada, Xi Xi ?

(5)  Partner/j-v with a local firm already having the NSP status such as KT,
      SK Telecom, Dacom, etc., or become an NSP.  49% foreign ownership
restirction.
      Huge regulatory filing.    Not feasible.

Parallel Actions:

(1 ) Take issue up with US Trade Representative (telecom) in DC (Jonathan
McHale).
      Also work with local Amcham telecom committee and US Embassy.

               We should do this in parallel with whatever option we choose.
I will work on this
               with Steve Burns in DC when we are farther along.

 (2) Work to  promote understanding of the merits of BWT for Korea/elsewhere.

               BWT was never contemplated in the laws and regulations. All our
               contacts said BWT needed to be explained more widely in Korea
to gain
               support.   It is new even to the telecom think tanks.   We
need to do
               missionary work on this to develop public opinion.   We need
to find
               a noted PhD economist who is a great communicator who can
speak to the
               think tanks in Korea, Singapore, Japan, etc. and give
interviews on
               the merits of BWT for efficiency, promoting investment, etc.
This will
               create the climate for regulators to change.  I have one
possibility in mind
               but suggestions of names welcome.  I will propose this
separately to
               Anthony later.

David


This deal is entered with a Mid Columbia delivery point and CAISO energy.
Please let me know when it has been fixed.

Thanks!


Here at AirTran Airways, we are busy preparing to enter our 37th
destination, Rochester, New York. New service will begin on March 14,
2002 with 2 daily, round-trip flights between Rochester and
Baltimore/Washington International Airport (BWI), as well as 2 daily,
round-trip flights between Rochester and our hub in Atlanta.

To help celebrate our new service to Rochester, we are offering
special, introductory fares as low as $39 one-way between Rochester
and BWI, and as low as $59 one-way between Rochester and Atlanta.  The
introductory fares must be purchased by January 30, 2002 and travel
must be completed by June 13, 2002.  See below for examples of more
introductory fares.

What's even better than introductory fares for travel to and from
Rochester airport?  How about getting a 5% discount for buying your
ticket at www.airtran.com !  That's right.  Buy your introductory fare
at www.airtran.com and receive a BONUS 5% discount.

Remember: Travel may originate in either city and all fares are
one-way and don't require roundtrip purchase.

Sample Fares for travel between Rochester, NY and:

$59     Atlanta
$39     Baltimore/Washington, DC (BWI)
$99     Dallas/Fort Worth
$90     Fort Lauderdale
$91     Gulfport/Biloxi
$99     Houston (Hobby)
$72     Jacksonville
$86     Memphis
$71     Myrtle Beach
$87     Orlando
$84     Tampa

Remember:  Travel on the above fares may originate in either city and
all fares are one-way and don't require roundtrip purchase.  And, if
you purchase your introductory fare at www.airtran.com , you'll
receive a BONUS 5% discount.

Other rules and restrictions: All fares are one-way. All fares are
non-refundable, and a $50 per person fee applies to any change made
after purchase plus any applicable increase in airfare.  Service
to/from Rochester, NY begins on March 14, 2002.  Travel must be
complete by June 13, 2002.  Fares must be purchased by January 30,
2002. The following blackout dates apply: March 28,29 and April 1,7
and May 24,28, 2002.  Seats are limited and subject to availability.
Fares don't include segment taxes of up to $3.00 per segment.  A
segment is defined as a takeoff and landing.  Airport passenger
facility charges of up to $18 are not included.

**********************************************************************

And now for the best deals on earth!!!! You know that you'll always
get a great deal on airfare from AirTran Airways, but did you know
that AirTran Airways has partnered with the Hertz Corporation to give
you special low rates on Hertz car rentals? To get these great rates,
click on the Hertz icon after you have completed your AirTran Airways
booking. You will be transferred to the Hertz website and the AirTran
Airways discount will be automatically applied.  AirTran Airways and
Hertz -- making travel affordable.

**********************************************************************

You've got a great airfare from AirTran Airways! Now complete your
travel package with a low rate from the Hilton Family of Hotels!  Just
click on the following link, and check out Hilton "Family" Value Rates
at most AirTran Airways destinations!
www.hilton.com/specials/values_main.html

**********************************************************************
As a subscriber to AirTran Airways' Net Escapes, we send you regular
updates on our Internet specials.  If you need to contact us for any
other reason, please call us at 1-800-AIR-TRAN, or in Atlanta call
770-994-8258. Please note that any reference to Net Escapes fares,
Feature City fares, or bonus discounts for booking online may ONLY be
purchased on our web site, http://www.airtran.com.

Please click: http://post.intellimedia.com:80/UM/U.asp?B35.86.102.529319
and you will be removed immediately!

Or

To unsubscribe, mailto:U-B35.86.102.529319@post.intellimedia.com
or if the emailaddress is not clickable, simply copy the text
to the right of the 'mailto:' command and paste it into your
email application and hit send.  You will be taken off the list
immediately. Thank you!


FYI.  Just so you know what we're saying in California.

The attached draft answers the California Municipal Utilities Association
complaint that California markets are not workably competitive and therefore
FERC should establish cost-based rates.  In its complaint, CMUA argued that
the market isn't workably competitive because the prices were higher this
summer than in previous years even in hours where demand was no higher.
Seabron's paper shows that high prices have resulted from a number of
unrelated structural and market design factors and increasing attempts at
regulatory intervention.  He also debunks the assertions that cost-based
rates will fix the problem in California and will be easily administered by
FERC.  Our answer is due at FERC tomorrow so please get me your comments ASAP.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 10:19 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Sabine Schnittger" <Sabine.Schnittger@frontier-economics.com>
                  10/25/2000 08:23 AM

To: "Mary C Hain" <mary.hain@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Draft response to CMUA paper

Mary:

Please find attached a first draft of Enron's response to the CMUA, please
let us know your comments.

Seabron can be contacted on his cell-phone (617 513 5904) this morning, but
will be in the office at noon. Alternatively, you could pass on comments to
me.

Are you or is one of our staff able to assist us with a reference to the
claim that hydro water levels were low in California this year?

Best wishes,

Sabine.

------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Sabine Schnittger
Managing Consultant
Frontier Economics
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138
Office tel:    (617) 354-0060
Office fax:   (617) 354-0640
Mobile:        (617) 480-5992
Email:   sabine.schnittger@frontier-economics.com
http://www.frontier-economics.com

 - 00-10-26-SA-SS draft.doc


OPEN IN PRIVATE

 - NicoleVanCroft01.jpg
 - NicoleVanCroft02.jpg
 - NicoleVanCroft03.jpg
 - NicoleVanCroft05.jpg
 - NicoleVancroft04.jpg
 - NicoleVanCroft06.jpg


CAN YOU SET UP GREG BERRY IN DUNCAN CROASDALE'S OLD SEAT.

THANKS,

JOHN


Elizabeth,

 Per your request, I have prepared the following summary.

Western RTO Development:

RTO West.
Area to be included -- WA, OR, ID, MT, Western WY, UT, NV-North & South and
hopefully Canada (BC Hydro and possibly Alberta)
Filed with FERC "Stage 1" documents in October 2000 -- Governance, Bylaws,
Draft of Operating Agreement, etc.
Stage 2 development begun January 2001 with of complete proposal in July 2001
Earliest practical operation Fall 2002 (optimistic based on quick on approval
time)
Plan Quality -- Good overall
Attractive Features -- independent board, single control area and real time
voluntary energy market, all parties on same tariff, a tradeable transmission
right with "use or lose" anti-hoarding provisions.
Unattractive Features -- Majority of transmission rights allocated to
existing users for a ten year period ("use or lose" will mitigate for short
term rights but long term rights on existing system will be tough to get).
Desert STAR.
Area to be included -- AZ, NM, CO, Eastern WY
Governance established and Board has been organized.
Have not yet filed a complete plan
Earliest practical operation Winter 2002 or beyond, depending on when they
actually file their proposal
Plan quality --  Potentially promising
Attractive Features -- similar transmission right regime as RTO West
Unknown -- whether they will have a single control area, whether
Unattractive Features -- Majority of transmission rights allocated to
existing users, board selection committee was manipulated by publics (however
in practice the independent board selected seems to have been little affected
by the search firm nomination process)
CA-ISO.
Area included -- CA IOU's only
Fully operational but with CA/FERC jurisdictional struggle over Board
appointment and independence.
Modifications to meet Order 2000 have been filed which appear to move
transmission rights close to the proposals under discussion in RTO West and
Desert STAR

Cooperative Regional Organization Activity:

Seams.
A joint task force of parties involved in RTO West, Desert STAR and CA-ISO
began meeting in November 2000
Three major seams issues identified and work begun
Scheduling time lines -- aligning processes between three RTOs so that
business across seams boundaries is not hampered for administrative reasons.
Nature of transmission rights and effect on loop flow -- making the
congestion management systems work between the three RTOs.
Export fees -- goal is to eliminate pancaking of fixed cost charges between
RTOs, perhaps by annual transfer payments between RTOs or some other
reciprocity agreement.
RTG Consolidation.
WRTA. SWRTA and WSCC voted to merge in to a single organization, the WIO
(Western Interconnection Organization)
WIO will have three committee:   Planning, Operations, Market Interface.
The Northwest organization (NRTA) has decided to stay independent for now,
but if RTO West forms it may just disappear as a separate organization.

If you need more detail, please let me know.

Steve

	Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
	01/26/2001 12:24 PM

		 To: Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
mday@gmssr.com
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Urgent - Steve Kean to testify at Senate hearing, need info

Steve Kean will be testifying at the Senate Energy Committee's hearing on
Wednesday regarding California.  Steve and Jim Steffes asked me to contact
you for the following information.  I've listed specific requests for several
people, but am copying many more of you for your input as well.  Anything you
can provide by sometime on Monday will be appreciated!

Dave Parquet - Siting of new power plants in California.  Any insight you can
provide regarding the rules, the current climate, what would fix the current
situation, etc.

Richard Sanders - Steve thinks he might be asked about whether the market was
manipulated.  Please provide information on whether this was the case and who
the participants likely were.  What's the current climate regarding
sanctions, etc.?

Mary Schoen - Any information you can provide relating to air emission issues
in California, and specific details for our recommendations regarding air
emissions.

Steve Walton - The status on RTO West, Desert Star, Cal ISO and general
information on RO development.

Sue Mara - Specific ordering language requiring the utilities to buy only
from the PX.  Was it required through legislation or the CPUC, and what
exactly does it mean.  Who was involved in formulating the language?
Information on block forward markets.

Alan Comnes - A copy of the CDWR response and anything they might have
available regarding long term proposals from the government.

Dan Allegretti - We have the e-mail Jim sent regarding the UI deal.  Please
provide more specifics on the deal, and information regarding portfolio
management approach.

Thanks for your help!


Rather than stating that capacity may be available from November 29, 2000
through March 31, 2001, the posting will now state that capacity may be
available from November 29, 2000 through March 31, 2001.

For those of you have already sent your approval, please notice this change.
For those of you who have not, please forward your approval to me immediately
to insure an immediate posting.

As discussed, the posting will remain up today until 6:00 p.m.  Please let me
know if there are any further questions.

Thanks

Mike


Dear eric,

12-GAME TICKET PACKAGES AVAILABLE NOW!

Choose from the "Mobley Midweek Plan (http://www.nbateamnews.com/i.cfm?DID=136775&UID=45456540&MID=190291)" featuring games with Michael Jordan, Shaq, Hakeem and Vince Carter. Or, pick "The Franchise Weekend Plan (http://www.nbateamnews.com/i.cfm?DID=136775&UID=45456540&MID=190291)," loaded with premium nights, including Bobble Head Dolls of Cuttino Mobley, Moochie Norris and Rockets mascot Clutch.

Either way, you're set to see some exciting fast-paced Rockets NBA action. So get with the plan, the Rockets 12-game ticket plan.

Plus, as a 12-game plan holder, you'll receive the option to purchase Rockets playoff tickets prior to the general public.

To view the games that comprise the "The Mobley Midweek Plan" and "The Franchise Weekend Plan," click here now(http://www.nbateamnews.com/i.cfm?DID=136775&UID=45456540&MID=190291)or call 713-627-DUNK for more information.

Houston Rockets Basketball. Get with the Plan.

-----------------------------------------------------
<!--Order your Rockets season tickets today by calling 713-627-DUNK.

To receive this email with graphics, colored text and active links, just go to: http://nba.mynbanews.com/wwwroot/rockets/validate.cfm
and enter your e-mail address. Click on "Modify Your Account" and then change your "Preferred E-mail Format" from TEXT to HTML!

Have any friends or family that would like the latest information on the Houston Rockets delivered right to their e-mail box? Just direct them to http://www.rockets.com to sign up for Rockets E-Blastoff.-->

To Modify Please Click On -
http://nba.mynbanews.com/wwwroot/rockets/modify.cfm?clientid=713&userid=45456540

To Deactivate Please Click On -
http://nba.mynbanews.com/wwwroot/rockets/deactivate.cfm?clientid=713&userid=45456540
-----------------------------------------------------
Topics: Single game tickets
        Game promotions/premiums


Kim, what day?


Attached is a memo regarding the above-referenced meeting.


Attached is a summary of the PJM RTO order.  While it is somewhat lengthy,
the order has a lot of good information in it that I wanted to share with the
group, particularly the Commission's statements regarding the existing
configuration of the northeast and the need to expand it.

We are working on summaries of the New York and New England RTO orders and
will have those out shortly.  If you would like copies of the orders, just
let us know.

We expect the mediation proceeding to begin within the next week.  We will
keep you updated.

Sarah


Eric,
     Considering the number of fires we have at Enron right now this is about the last thing on Stan's mind.  Hill and Hartsoe are appropriate to be attending this meeting.  Again--I think that this is a bit more of Dennis' overkill.  Do you think he goes dove hunting with grenades?

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Gadd, Eric
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 7:29 PM
To: McCarty, Danny
Subject: FW: Sent on Behalf of Dennis McConaghy - Washington

Danny,

I recommend that Bob Hill and Joe Hartzoe represent Enron in DC on 15 Nov with the Senators.  Dennis probably prefers that either you or Stan appear.  Please advise.
-----Original Message-----
From: Samantha Smith [mailto:samantha_smith@transcanada.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 6:34 PM
To: Somerhalder John; Holm Jay; Wright Byron S.; Wadlington Jr. Cuba; Moore James C. (Jim); Carlton Cavan; King Tom; Lund Peter; Horton, Stanley; McCarty, Danny; Gadd, Eric; Hulse Darcel; John Fred; Evans Robert B.; Reese Brad D.
Cc: Friesen Donna; Stewart D. Michael G.; Palmer Tony; Birch Murray; Moffatt J. Curtis; Roberts Tom; Ellwood John
Subject: Sent on Behalf of Dennis McConaghy - Washington

Gentleman,

The two attached email items from Van Ness describe draft legislation which Senator Murkowski is considering introducing and the likely timing of such action.

As the note describes, Murkowski would:

ban OTT; and
introduce a "trigger date concept", presently Jan. 1, 2003, for ANGTS would have filed with the Secretary of Energy a proposal which the Secretary certifies to be the substantial equivalent of a complete Section 7 application for public convenience and necessity; in the event the trigger date is not met, allow the "producer enabling" legislation, which would provide ANGTA-type expedition for any NGA Section 7 application to build a pipeline in Alaska, to come into effect.

Currently, our best sense is that Murkowski could unveil this alternative as early as next week, either as part of a Republican energy bill or an amendment to pending legislation.

Concurrently, the Democratic side , via the staffs of both Daschle and Bingaman, are preparing a comprehensive energy bill which will contain an Alaskan gas pipeline title.  At present, we do not yet have a sense of what that title would contain, and we been assured the current "placeholder" in the draft does not indicate that Daschle and Bingaman have
decided to support producer legislation.

While it is not certain that Murkowski could force this issue alone, it is in our collective best interests to forestall any producer legislation by demonstrating real progress as soon as possible. This is particularly true because the current political situation could make it easier for Murkowski or others to bypass the usual process and proceed with an amendment to non-energy legislation from the floor.

Based on the advice from our advisors in Washington, we believe that we should execute and publicly announce the MOU no later than November 15, and earlier if feasible.  We also believe  that the signatories to MOU should be available in Washington on the 15th to meet face to face with Murkowski, Binagman and Daschle to convey:

progress on the re-enlistment as represented by the MOU;
our commitment to the development of a commercial proposal for ANGTS that results in serious face-to-face negotiations in the first quarter of 2002; and
our continued position that any legislative action by Congress at this time is premature because

we have resolved, in principle, a key obstacle identified by the producers;
with all parties coalescing around an Alaskan Highway project, ANGTS remains the best vehicle for expediting the actual construction of the pipeline;
because we need the Producers as shippers, there is no possibility that we could exert undue commercial pressure on them; and
establishing a deadline would provide the producers with the incentive to simply run out the clock.

Although circumstances politically might suggest our being in Washington ahead of the 15th, I recognize that the 15th better conforms to the reality of commercial progress.  I plan to speak to this on the Wednesday commercial meeting in Calgary. I would hope that at the Wednesday meeting your representatives would be able to confirm your participation for meetings on the 15th with the three Senators.

Obviously, it is our view, at Foothills/ANNGTC, that we want to deflect the Congress from enacting any legislation at this time, and particularly anti-ANGTS legislation like that Murkowski is considering.  We need the help of Murkowksi and others to cause the Producers to match the serious steps and compromises we have made, not to enact a statutory scheme that encourages and rewards their unwillingness to develop a comprehensive pipeline package.

Dennis McConaghy  403-920-2011


Deal has been changed to reflect this.  Thank you


582324 - Grays Harbor Paper Mill
582322 - Las Vegas Cogeneration

I've added the unit names to the deals and reminded Les that they need to be
in the comments section. He was under the impression that the guideline sheet
he sent out re: unit names spelled out the answers, but I took another look
at it and it doesn't seem to really answer anything. I've attached it just in
case you don't have it anymore - but please let me know if this assists you
guys in ANY way. If it doesn't, I can probably get him to draw up something
more useful.

Thanks,
Kate

From Les Rawson:

Here's the list of current Service's Desk customers we sell as Unit
Contingent. We want to confirm the sales but not the purchases.

Lv Cogen. located within Nevada Power service territory.

Unit ID: LV Cogen. unit located in North Las Vegas

Could be sold at Nevada Power system, Mead 230, Navajo, McCullough, Red Butte.

Saguaro Power Company located within Nevada Power service territory.

Unit ID: Saguaro Power unit located in Henderson Nevada.

Sale Points: Nevada System, Mead 230, Navajo, McCullough, Red Butte.

Grays Harbor Paper L.P. located in BPA service territory. Behind Grays Harbor
PUD.

Unit ID: Grays Harbor Paper unit located in Haquiam, WA.

Sale Points: Entire Northwest interconnect.

Willamette Ind. located in PacifiCorp's service territory.

Unit ID; Willamette Ind. Albany Paper mill, located in Albany, Or.

Sale Points: Entire Northwest interconnect.


Matt,

Please take a look at these spreadsheets and calc the gas usage by plant and
by pipe in CA.  Chris Foster is telling us that most of these palnts will be
shutting down in the next few weeks due to credit exposure.  Let's discuss
the impact on sendouts.

Thanks,
Grigsby
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001 01:05
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris H Foster                           01/18/2001 03:45 PM

To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Power Plants

Philip is a list of the gas plants.  CEC list is all plants including QFs and
non QFs (i.e.utility plants and the IPPs - Reliant, SOuthern et al).

Chris


Ben:

See the email below from Rebecca to Catherine Clark.

Rebecca informed me a few minutes ago that Catherine is planning to speak
with Peter Anderson (ESA Corporate Finance) and make it clear to him that ESA
is responsible for paying the Execution Amount (already determined in the
Agreement) plus the interest cost ($21,500 per day) until the day on which
funding occurs.

If the transaction closes & funds tomorrow as expected, ESA's interest
payment will be based upon 28 days.  If for some reason the funding is
delayed, ESA will be responsible for the additional interest cost until
funding occurs.  Catherine believes that if ESA delivers their notice to
close [as expected] by 9:30 am tomorrow morning, then there is a high
likelihood that closing and funding will occur tomorrow.

Rebecca and Catherine believe, and I concur, that this information is best
delivered verbally directly to ESA's finance person (Peter Anderson).

Call me tonight at home if you wish to discuss.

Fred

---------------------- Forwarded by Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 06:34 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca Walker @ ENRON                           12/19/2000 05:49 PM

To: Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Funding/Closing of ESA

Catherine

Ben is concerned that ESA may not be funded on the same day it is closed
(tomorrow), and that ENA will end up paying the $21,500 in interest for each
day between closing and funding.  By what time tomorrow must everything be
executed/wired to ensure that funding and closing both take place tomorrow?

Please include Fred Mitro on future correspondance about this deal.  He is
working with Kay Mann on both this deal and the Coral energy deal while  Ben
is out of the office.

Thanks,
Rebecca


Start Date: 2/2/02; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020202.txt


What are your thoughts on Team Leadership?  Several of the managers in the
group were using them last year for coaching and I have received very
positive feedback.   I would like for them to be able to continue with the
counseling, but wanted to see what you thought.

Thanks!
Sheri


Hi Maureen:
Could you please make sure that Steve gets these? Thanks a bunch.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 02:44 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	05/11/2001 02:14 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hertzberg Talking Points


It was a billing error. We didn't bill them for enough back in early 2000 and
then too much in Dec.  I don't think you need to worry about it unless they
mention it to you.  If so, try to blame me and have them call me to explain.

C

To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: akzo

Chris,

I am assuming this is ok.  Why would they be invoiced for Feb - April now?
Was this an error?

Have they called you with any questions and should I get back with them?

Kim
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Ward/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001 01:21 PM
---------------------------

Isabel Y Resendez
02/05/2001 10:45 AM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: akzo

Chris,
I am sorry to keep bring this account up.  Thank you for the price change.  I
have all the months corrected; however, Akzo got invoice incorrectly for
February, March and April.  The coordinator who invoice them use the January
NGI index price instead of the correct month index.  The amount they owe ENA
is $17,561.05.  ENA owes them (7,922.93) for some volume allocation for
December 2000.  So the net amount they owe ENA is $9,638.12.
I need to invoice them for the incorrect NGI index used and also to give them
back the credit owed to them.   Let me know if this is ok with you.
isabel

PS I promise this is it.


Mary:
Debra said that you might have some ideas as to whom I can contact.  Susan
Flynn gave me Zulie Flores' name.
Carol
---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 04/14/2000
03:09 PM ---------------------------

Carol St Clair
04/14/2000 11:12 AM
To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Misc

Debra:
Susan Flynn mentioned that you might be able to help me out on getting some
Enron stuff for the kids that I teach Junior Achievement to at my son's
school.  I have been trying to contact someone that would be willing to give
this class some Enron freebies with no luck.  I think that Marge Nadasky was
the last person that my secretary talked to.  Do you know of anyone that can
help me out?
Carol


Please handle.  I think you should send an email to the OGC and ask if they
are aware of any such contracts.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 02:53 PM -----

	Sharon Butcher/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/10/2001 12:18 PM

		 To: AL ALEXANDERSON/ENRON@enronxgate, William E Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark
A Evans/HOU/EES@EES, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Labanowski/ENRON@enronXgate, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jordan Mintz/ENRON@enronXgate,
Michael P Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristina Mordaunt/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Eric Newell/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rex Rogers/ENRON@enronXgate, Molly Sample/Houston/Eott@Eott, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Stephen Wallace/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob Walls/ENRON@enronXgate, Randy
Young/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: U.S. Small Business Admin. Evaluation of Enron's Subcontracting
Program

Dear General Counsels:

The U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Government Contracting has
advised that on May 25, 2001, they will evaluate Enron's subcontracting
program and compliance on any subcontracting plans in effect on current
contracts.

This review will cover the last five (5) years.  All Forms 294 and 295 filed
with the Small Business Adminstration along with the names of each
Administrative Contracting Officer (U.S. Government employee responsible for
monitoring the contract) for each contract will be subject to the review.

In addition, total subcontract placement with small businesses, small
disadvantaged businesses, women-owned small businesses, and HubZone small
businesses shall be reviewed.  Further, the amount of indirect or overhead
costs, if any, apportioned to contract goals is subject to review.

We will also need information on the number of active suppliers Enron is
currently using in the following categories:  large business, small business,
small disadvantaged business, women-owned small business and HubZone
business.  The review will cover these figures for one year ago if available.

Please contact me by Wednesday, April 11, 2001 and advise me of the number of
contracts between the United States Government and the Enron entities you
represent.  In the event any of the Enron entities which you represent have
government contracts, we will need a member of your respective law
department(s) to pull the government contracts, and all supporting
documentation, from the Enron companies which you represent and be available
to work with other members of the team.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 713-853-7224.

Thank you.

Sharon


Louise,

If you guys are still looking for originators, you should put a call into Rodney Malcolm 3-4746.  He is very strong, and most likely available with the demise of DaveCo.

Don


thanks for the follow-up,
fletch


Gerald

Here is a BGML redlined guaranty format.  Please review and provide opinion.

thanks
brant


Here is my breakdown for the number of 890,000:

California Energy Hub Sale  702,122
Golden Gate Purch liq(N09325.3) 2,406,375
Pacific Gas & Electric Sale Liqs  (2,231,985)

Support to follow


Gerald,

 In Illinois, the courts have generally held a contract may be assigned to
another party if the contract is silent on whether the contract is
assignable.  However, the case law fails to specifically discuss if consent
of the non-assigning party is required for the assignment to be valid.
However, I think it is reasonable to interpret the omission of such a
"consent requirement" in the discussion on assignment, to conclude that
consent is not required.   See the discussion below:

ILLINOIS JURISPRUDENCE
Copyright 1999 LEXIS Law Publishing, a div. of Reed Elsevier Inc.

Thomas D. Nusbaum, J.D.

COMMERCIAL LAW ?
PART TWO. UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE ?
CHAPTER 9. ARTICLE 2: SALES ?
III. PERFORMANCE ?
A. OVERVIEW OF OBLIGATIONS

Illinois Jur, Commercial Law o 9:35

o 9:35. Delegation or assignment

? ?A party may perform a duty under a sales contract through a delegate,
unless otherwise agreed or unless the other party has a substantial interest
in having the original promisor perform or control the acts required by the
contract. No delegation of performance relieves the party delegating of any
duty to perform or any liability for breach. ?n35

All rights of the seller or buyer may be assigned, unless otherwise agreed.
?n36

This may include rights under a warranty, such that the assignee of a
warrantee's rights under an express warranty, if the assignment is otherwise
valid, succeeds to all those rights and thus stands in privity with the
warrantor. Such an assignee's privity would generally enable it to sue for
economic loss and consequential damages, just as an original contracting
party might do. ?n37

Unless the circumstances indicate the contrary, a prohibition of assignment
of ''the contract'' is to be construed as barring only the delegation to the
assignee of the assignor's performance. ?n38 However, an assignment is barred
where it would materially change the duty of the other party, increase
materially the burden or risk imposed on him by the contract, or impair
materially his chance of obtaining return performance. A right to damages for
breach of the whole contract or a right arising out of the assignor's due
performance of his entire obligation can be assigned despite an agreement
otherwise, ?n39 because no delegation of any performance is involved. ?n40

An assignment of ''the contract,'' of ''all my rights under the contract,''
or in similar general terms is an assignment of rights, and unless the
language or the circumstances, as in an assignment for security, indicate the
contrary, is also a delegation of performance of the duties of the assignor.
The acceptance of such an assignment by the assignee constitutes a promise to
perform those duties. This promise is enforceable by either the assignor or
the other party to the original contract. ?n41

Comment: Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code ?n42 takes no position on
the possibility of extending some recognition or power to the original
parties to work out normal commercial readjustments of the contract in the
case of financing assignments even after the original obligor has been
notified of the assignment. This question is dealt with in Article 9. ?n43

On the other hand, the other party may treat any assignment which delegates
performance as creating reasonable grounds for insecurity and may, without
prejudice to his rights against the assignor, demand assurances from the
assignee. ?n44

Digest Data

Case Authorities:

Assignments to jobbers were not forbidden where agreements' assignment
provision made only one limitation on dealer's right to assign and no
limitations on franchisor. Beachler v Amoco Oil Co., 112 F3d 902 (CA7 Ill
1997).

The sale of the defendant corporation was not violative of a clause in the
parties' contract that prohibited assignment without the prior written
consent of the plaintiff, since a change in corporate ownership does not
constitute a variation of that corporation's contractual duty and at all
times, the defendant remained an independent, functioning organization; thus,
the sale of the defendant corporation did not change the defendant's
obligations under the contract and did not assign the defendant's rights and
duties under the agreement to anyone. Baxter Healthcare Corp. v O.R.
Concepts, 69 F3d 785 (CA7 Ill 1995).

The change of ownership of defendant's stock did not constitute an assignment
of defendant's interests in its agreement with plaintiff; a change in
corporate ownership does not constitute a variation of that corporation's
contractual obligations. Baxter Healthcare Corp. v O.R. Concepts, 69 F3d 785,
27 UCCRS2d 1185 (CA7 Ill 1995).

Annotation References: Sales: what constitutes ''reasonable grounds for
insecurity'' justifying demand for adequate assurance of performance under
UCC o 2-609. 37 ALR5th 459. Liability of secured creditor under uniform
commercial code to third party on ground of unjust enrichment. 27 ALR5th 719.

Periodicals:

For article, ''Survey of Illinois Law: Commercial Law,'' see 21 S. Ill.
U.L.J. 729 (1997).

FOOTNOTES:
???[n35] 810 ILCS 5/2-210(1).

[n36] 810 ILCS 5/2-210(2). Assignments are generally discussed in Illinois
Jur, Property.

[n37] Collins Co. v Carboline Co. (1988) 125 Ill 2d 498, 127 Ill Dec 5, 532
NE2d 834, CCH Prod Liab Rep 12019, 7 UCCRS2d 616, later proceeding (CA7 Ill)
864 F2d 560, 7 UCCRS2d 629. As to warranties generally, see oo 9:76 et seq.

[n38] 810 ILCS 5/2-210(3).

[n39] 810 ILCS 5/2-210(2).

[n40] Official Comment 3 to UCC o 2-210.

[n41] 810 ILCS 5/2-210(4).

[n42] 810 ILCS 5/2-101 et seq.

[n43] Official Comment 5 to UCC o 2-210. As to Article 9 of the UCC (810 ILCS
5/9-101 et seq.) generally, see Chapter 17, Article 9: Secured Transactions.

[n44] 810 ILCS 5/2-210(5). As to the right to seek assurance under 810 ILCS
5/2-609, see o 9:36.

Research References:

Forms:

Complaint-Misrepresentation of ability to pay for goods. 7A Callaghan's
Illinois Civil Practice Forms, Sales o 176.07.

COMMERCIAL LAW ?
PART ONE. CONTRACTS ?
CHAPTER 6. GUARANTY, SURETY, AND INDEMNITY CONTRACTS ?
II. GUARANTY CONTRACTS ?
A. IN GENERAL

Illinois Jur, Commercial Law o 6:10

o 6:10. Assignability; substitution of parties

? ?Illinois recognizes the general principle of nonassignability of
guaranties. ?n44 The general rule provides that a guarantor is released from
his obligations where the creditor assigns his contract to a third party.
?n45 However, that rule is not applied mechanically; rather, the facts of
each case determine whether the policy underlying the rule applies. ?n46 The
test of whether a guaranty may be transferred is not whether new credit is
extended after the transfer, but whether the obligations of the parties to
the guaranty have thereby changed. ?n47

The rationale for the rule that a special guaranty is not assignable without
the consent of the guarantor stems from the general contract principle that a
person may be held only to the precise obligation he undertook. ?n48 The rule
thus rests upon the principle that the assignment would be a material
alteration because the surety may have extended his promise because of his
reliance on one or the other of the original parties or because the addition
of the new party would materially affect the operation of the instrument.
?n49

A simple assignment of a guaranty pursuant to a contract between a
creditor-guarantee and a third party is more likely to cause a material
alteration in the guarantor's obligation than an assignment pursuant to a
merger, but, in either case, a court must determine whether the guarantor's
obligation was materially altered. The manner in which an assignment takes
place is not determinative. ?n50

Claims for money arising by virtue of past extensions of credit made in
reliance upon a continuing guaranty can be assigned. ?n51

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 04:04 PM -----

	David Portz
	02/26/2001 03:37 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Reagan Rorschach@ENRON
		 Subject: Latest Clarksdale Proposal

Forwarding revised Mississippi munis proposal, as discussed.

----- Forwarded by David Portz/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 03:35 PM -----

	Reagan Rorschach@ENRON
	02/26/2001 01:31 PM

		 To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Latest Clarksdale Proposal

David,

Thanks for your help.  See attached.

Reagan


yep

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rodrigue, Robin
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 5:10 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	TRV

Phillip,

Could you open our publish list for the EMW files and update your email address?  Everytime I publish now your email comes back as undeliverable.

Thanks
Robin


Speaking of Canadian eligible contract participants...I was told from an
originator in Canada that per someone in Enron Canada's legal department,
Canadian contract participants are not held to the same standards as US (i.e.
they are not required to have minimum assets &/or equity etc.).  Is this
true???  Please advise and forward to me the eligible contract participant
information we discussed at the happy-hour last wednesday.

Thanks
WEndy
---------------------- Forwarded by Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron on 03/09/2001
05:08 PM ---------------------------

MARY COOK@ECT
03/09/2001 02:06 PM
To: Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark
Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT
cc: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendy
Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT

Subject: Canada Work Report

See attached.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


I saw you didn't get these.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/07/2000 09:52
AM ---------------------------
From: Roseann Engeldorf on 12/07/2000 09:39 AM
To: michael.barnas@ps.ge.com
cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, Lisa.Bills@enron.com,
paul.miller@ps.ge.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com,
stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, "ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: Assignment and Consent

See attached.

----- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on 12/07/2000 09:37 AM -----

	Roseann Engeldorf
	12/06/2000 11:12 PM

		 To: michael.barnas@ps.ge.com
		 cc: Kay.Mann@enron.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, Lisa.Bills@enron.com,
paul.miller@ps.ge.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com,
stephen.swift@ps.ge.com
		 Subject: Yet another version

We will agree that the attached does not apply to world hunger - only to
Turbo Park.

Rose

	michael.barnas@ps.ge.com
	12/06/2000 03:33 PM

		 To: Kay.Mann@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com,
Lisa.Bills@enron.com
		 cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, paul.miller@ps.ge.com
		 Subject: New, Improved Consent to Assignment and Assignment Sideletter Lan
guage

Fellow Sufferers,

Below you will find:

(a)    a revised Consent to Assignment, and

(b)    assignment language waiting to be framed:

Please note that in the interest of time I am sending them to you before the
GE team has had an opportunity to review them.  Accordingly, there may be
some addition comments from our side.

Happy reading!

 Mike Barnas
g _____________
Michael C. Barnas
Counsel, Power Plants Commercial Operations
GE Power Systems
One River Road - Building 37, Room 307
Schenectady,  NY 12345  USA
Phone 8*235-7602       (518) 385 7602
Fax     8*235 5466        (518) 385 5466
Mobile 518 369 9538

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in
error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and erase all copies of
this message.  Thank you.

 - ESAconsentMCBRev.doc
 - WorldHungerAssignmentDec6.doc


Hey Julie,

Just wondering if you had any preferences regarding the spa times I emailed you yesterday.  If you get a chance let me know and I will go ahead and make a reservation.

Ciao,
Susan


You are so picky!!

RR

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Nancy Hernandez @ ENRON                           02/26/2001 03:53 PM

To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Book Request

You forgot to attach the request.

NH

Robin Rodrigue@ECT
02/26/2001 03:51 PM
To: Nancy Hernandez/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Book Request

Nancy,

Here's the book request I spoke with you about.   This also needs to be added
to the AGG-GAS, AGG-GASIII, AND AGG-GASIV portfolios.  Please include as a
separate portfolio named trader under the Lavorato Other region.

Please let me know when this book is set up.

Thanks,
Robin


Yesterday I had a meeting with my staff to review recent events, including the revised earnings announcement last week, the merger agreement and anything else on their minds.

Perhaps besides the field, this may be the largest concentration of long-tenured employees.   Their personal financial losses are tremendous, especially when considered against their annual compensation.   As might be expected, they express their frustrations and resentments with Enron management.  Still, I am struck by their ongoing commitment to ETS and doing their jobs.  They seem eager to have the opportunity to show our accomplishments to Dynegy when the time is right.

They ask lots of questions.. most of which I could readily answer.

Here are two that I could not answer.  I'm hoping HR can help me with responses:

- Prior corp. correspondence said that the Click at Home program is under review.  One employee reported that he tried to log in to order a computer this week and the system was unavailable.  They want to know whether this means that the program has been canceled.

- I received several questions about Savings Plan/ESOP loans.  Is there any requirement for accelerated loan payment if the value of the loan exceeds the current value of the savings plan account?


Jeff and Greg,

Operationally, we are doing great, with tremendous press coverage (USA
Today, CNN, Newsweek, Boston Globe, etc...), growing traffic, and lots of
praise for our site and concept.  On the business development front, we are
now talking seriously with eBay about a distribution arrangement and with
Northwest about expanding to their full route system.

Meanwhile, we are running out of cash.  The money we've got in the bank will
last through early August (assuming an orderly shut-down).  In order to keep
our business development efforts alive, we're trying to raise $500k at a low
valuation in the next 30 days.  Would you be willing to consider a portion
of this amount as a personal investment?

Attached is an up-to-date overview of where we stand.

Best,
Frank Levy

 - Update 5_30_01 v2.ppt


Nov-01	12339	16861	8932


[IMAGE]	News ? Money ?  Entertainment ?  Kids ?  Family 	Keyword Search
ESPN.com Search The Web ??????
[IMAGE]			?

ESPN.com and Soccernet Have Joined Forces!
3 Risk Free Issues!

[IMAGE]

	?ESPN Network: ESPN.com | NFL.com | NBA.com | NASCAR | NHL.com | WNBA.com |
ABCSports | EXPN | FANTASY | STORE | INSIDER	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

M College BB
[IMAGE]

Scores/Schedules
Rankings
Standings
Statistics
Transactions
Injuries
Message board
Weekly lineup
Teams
Recruiting
NCAA StatSearch

?
Sport Sections
[IMAGE]

MLB

Scores

NBA?|?Playoffs

Scores

NHL?|?Finals

Scores

Golf Online

Scores

Soccer

Scores

WNBA

Scores
NFL
College Football
M College BB
Tennis
Autos?|?Indy 500
NASCAR
Horse Racing
Soccernet (UK)

More Sports Baseball-min. Boxing CFL Col hockey Extreme Fig. skating High
School Hockey-min. Outdoors W. Col BB Other sports

?
Broadcast
[IMAGE]

ESPN Radio
TV Listings
Video Highlights
Audio Highlights

?
Community
[IMAGE]

Sign-in/Home
Chat
Message Boards
Arcade Games

?
ESPN Inc.
[IMAGE]

The Magazine
Personalities
Press Releases
ESPN Products
Ask ESPN
ESPN Zone

[IMAGE]

SPECIAL SECTIONS
Fantasy Games
??MLB: Tip sheet
??MLB: Daily dish

Contests
Baseball Trivia
Champ. Road Test

Careers in Sports

ESPN Classic

SportsFigures

Sports JEOPARDY!

Training Room

Vid Game Reviews

?			Tuesday, May 30
			Mock draft No. 1: Mihm's the word

?

?	By Andy Katz
	ESPN.com

	With the number of impact players available in the NBA draft somewhere
between few and none, this year's selections will be based on the potential
of the underclassmen and the needs of the teams.

	NBA scouts, general managers and player personnel directors are banking
heavily on impressions made at private workouts and the Chicago pre-draft
camp June 6-9. Because so many players are relatively close in terms of
talent and opinions could change almost daily, this is the first of several
projections we'll have on ESPN.com.

	A number of players still have work to do to earn first-round spots, but
could easily sneak back on with impressive workouts and/or a strong showing
in Chicago.

	The borderline first-rounders who didn't make ESPN.com's list but have a
chance to move up are UCLA sophomore forward JaRon Rush, LSU senior center
Jabari Smith, Temple junior guard Mark Karcher, UCLA freshman guard Jason
Kapono, Purdue senior forward Brian Cardinal, Connecticut junior point guard
Khalid El-Amin, Indiana senior guard A.J. Guyton, Ohio State senior point
guard Scoonie Penn, Northern Arizona senior center Dan McClintock, Ohio State
junior guard Michael Redd, Penn State senior center Jarrett Stephens, Turkey
forward Hidayet Turkoglu and Nigerian forward Olumide Oyediji.

	Any of these players could crack the bottom third of the draft over the next
month. The problem for underclassmen such as Kapono and Karcher is they must
decide if it's worth the risk to stay in the draft. Underclassmen have until
June 21 to pull their name out and still return to school. Rush, El-Amin and
Redd have all said they plan on staying in the draft, regardless of what
happens.

	ESPN.com checked with scouts around the league to get a feel about its mock
draft and came up with these 29 selections for the week of May 22.

	Chris Mihm

	Mihm towered over much of the competition in college.

	1. New Jersey -- Chris Mihm, 7-0, Jr., Texas: The Nets need a center and
could go with Mihm or Kenyon Martin, but the pick here is Mihm. The Nets
could either hold on to the pick and see if Jayson Williams plays next
season, or deal it to the Bulls for the No. 4 and No. 7 picks.

	2. Vancouver - Kenyon Martin, 6-9, Sr., Cincinnati: The Grizzlies would be
getting a steal by grabbing Martin at No. 2. He's the hardest-working player
in the draft and, with a healthy leg, the most effective low-post scorer.
Martin could play next to Shareef Abdur-Rahim and Bryant Reeves. If the
Grizzlies aren't ready to go with Martin, he makes for a tantalizing trade.

	3. Los Angeles Clippers - Stromile Swift, 6-9, So., LSU: The Clippers have
already inquired about Swift and see him as a potential small/power forward
(which goes against LSU coach John Brady's philosophy of how to use him
defensively). But, if Swift knows he's going to the Clips, he could opt to
return to school. He has said he will not hire an agent, leaving the door
open for a return.

	4. Chicago -- Joel Przybilla, 7-0, Soph., Minnesota: The Bulls need a center
for their triangle offense. If they can't trade for Mihm, Przybilla is next
in line. He needs work but he has the skills to develop into a better
offensive product than Luc Longley was during the Bulls' championship runs.

	5. Orlando -- Marcus Fizer, 6-8, Jr., Iowa State: The Magic love Darius Miles
but won't let Fizer drop below No. 5 if he's available. Fizer gives the Magic
an inside scorer and a tough presence on the backboard that they lacked last
season. Doc Rivers will fall in love with his work ethic.

	6. Atlanta -- Mike Miller, 6-8, Soph., Florida: The Hawks have been high on
Miller for a month and won't let him slide past them. Miles might be a better
scorer but Miller's versatility will win the Hawks over at No. 6. Atlanta
wants a small forward over a big guard.

	7. Chicago -- Darius Miles, 6-9, HS, East St. Louis (Ill.): The Bulls can
package Miles and Przybilla to the Nets or keep two players who could be
solid players in the league. Miles might have more of an upside than Tracy
McGrady. Tim Floyd knows all about working with high school seniors and would
have the patience to wait for Miles to develop.

	8. Cleveland -- Iakovos Tsakalidis, 7-1, Greece: The Cavs want size and the
third-rated center in the draft is Tsakalidis. The Celtics covet him, too,
but Cleveland might not give them the chance because of the Cavs' need for
size with the uncertainty in their frontcourt. Reviews on Tsakalidis are
split -- either scouts love him or think he's too slow.

	9. Houston -- Courtney Alexander, 6-5, Sr., Fresno State: Alexander could go
higher but not above six. The Rockets need scorers and Alexander will produce
during individual workouts. The choice of Alexander, DeShawn Stevenson,
DerMarr Johnson or Morris Peterson is hard to argue. Alexander can rise over
a defense for a jump shot and has a pro game.

	10. Orlando -- DeShawn Stevenson, 6-5, HS, Washington Union (Fresno, Calif.):
The Magic will take one of the two high school seniors with one of their
three picks. If Miles is gone, Stevenson will be too by No. 11. Orlando has
scouted him for months and Rivers can afford to let Stevenson mature without
feeling pressured to play him next season.

	11. Boston -- DerMarr Johnson, 6-9, Fr., Cincinnati: Johnson can't slip past
11 with his Lamar Odom-like skills on the wing. The Celtics need size but
can't let a scorer get past them in the draft. Johnson learned defense from
Max Good and Bob Huggins, so Rick Pitino's pressure defense shouldn't be much
different.

	12. Dallas -- Mamadou N'diaye, 7-0, Sr., Auburn: Trying to predict what Don
Nelson will do is the most difficult thing in this mock draft. But the
Mavericks need athleticism in the frontcourt. They can't afford to go with a
foreigner or a slower big man. N'diaye fits here if he does well in workouts
and in Chicago -- if he shows.

	13. Orlando -- Mateen Cleaves, 6-2, Sr., Michigan State: The Magic have to
take a point guard with one of their three picks, but no one is good enough
to spend the No. 5 or No. 10 pick on. Cleaves is at the top of the
point-guard list list -- and would fit Rivers' style of play and coaching
because of his leadership and toughness.

	14. Detroit -- Morris Peterson, 6-6, Sr., Michigan State: The Pistons won't
let the local hero leave the state. Peterson gives them a scorer to go next
to or in place of Grant Hill if he leaves via free agency. Peterson could go
higher -- if he's gone, the Pistons will take Alexander or Johnson.

	15. Milwaukee -- Etan Thomas, 6-9, Sr., Syracuse: The Bucks want a power
forward and Thomas is fourth on their list behind Martin, Fizer and Swift.
None will be available by the time they pick. Thomas can give them a
rebounder and defender, something they lacked in their playoff losses to the
Pacers.

	16. Sacramento -- Erick Barkley, 6-1, Soph., St. John's: The Kings need a
backup point to Jason Williams. Barkley could come in and wouldn't be under
any pressure to perform immediately. He's the No. 2 point guard behind
Cleaves.

	17. Seattle -- Quentin Richardson, 6-6, Soph., DePaul: Had Richardson stayed,
he would have probably been in the lottery next season. But he doesn't fit
all of the teams' needs above, which is why he falls all the way to the
Sonics. He gives them another rebounding wing and a scorer to complement
Rashard Lewis, if he re-signs.

	18. Los Angeles Clippers -- Keyon Dooling, 6-3, Soph., Missouri: The Clippers
need a point guard but won't take one at No. 3. Dooling has the upside that
some of the senior points don't carry into the draft. But the potential of
being a mid-teens draft pick may scare Dooling into returning to school.

	19. Charlotte -- Jerome Moiso, 6-10, Soph., UCLA: Moiso could still slide up
into the late lottery (maybe to Dallas) but if he falls, the Hornets will
catch him. Moiso can play power forward or center for the Hornets because of
his ability to block shots and score from 12 feet in to the basket. The
Hornets could use a frontcourt player or shooting guard in this draft.

	20. Philadelphia -- Jamal Crawford, 6-6, Fr., Michigan: The Sixers have
already called on Crawford's behalf and love him as a combo guard to come off
the bench. Crawford would likely stay in the draft if he's in the first
round, regardless of where he's being picked.

	21. Toronto -- Craig "Speedy" Claxton, 5-11, Sr., Hofstra: The Raptors have
already begun working out point guards and have Claxton in their top five. If
Cleaves, Barkley, Dooling and Crawford are all gone, Claxton is the natural
pick for the Raptors.

	22. New York -- Jamaal Magloire, 6-11, Sr., Kentucky: The Knicks took some
heat for taking Frederic Weis last year. Jeff Van Gundy wants tough, physical
players. Magloire gets the nod over Jason Collier if the Knicks go big.
Magloire proved this season that he can play with passion in the post.

	23. Utah -- Hanno M"tt"l,, 6-9, Sr., Utah: The Jazz can't go wrong with
picking M"tt"l, from nearby Utah. He can score from the wing, but he'll end
up playing more inside because of his defensive limitations as a small
forward. If M"tt"l, doesn't go to the Jazz, he could slip out of the first
round.

	24. Chicago -- Jeryl Sasser, 6-7, Jr., SMU: The Bulls have to find a point
guard in this draft but can't go after one in the lottery. The most
intriguing point guard left could be Sasser. He can play both guard
positions, he's one of the better defenders in the draft and would give the
Bulls some versatility on the floor.

	25. Phoenix -- Jason Collier, 7-0, Sr., Georgia Tech: The Suns need another
big guy to go with Luc Longley -- either as a backup, or on the floor
together. Collier has more offensive potential than many big men. The Suns
have the luxury to allow Collier a few years to develop into a NBA center.

	26. Utah -- Chris Carrawell, 6-6, Sr., Duke: The Jazz need to add athleticism
and fresh legs, either with Carrawell or Oklahoma State's Desmond Mason.
Carrawell will probably get the nod because of his Duke pedigree. He could
still go higher but his 'tweener status fits more as a late first-round pick.

	27. Indiana -- Donnell Harvey, 6-8, Fr., Florida: Harvey is getting rave
reviews for his work ethic in workouts, and he didn't leave school early
without some sort of assurance he could go in the first round. The Pacers
have a history of going younger in the draft.

	28. Portland -- Soumaila Samake, 7-2, Cincinnati Stuff (IBL): The Blazers
don't need much but could go with a wacky pick by taking the first player to
jump from the fledgling IBL to the NBA. Samake has the size, shot-blocking
skills and potential to be an NBA center. Arvydas Sabonis doesn't have many
miles left in his legs.

	29. Los Angeles Lakers -- Desmond Mason, 6-6, Sr., Oklahoma State: Here's
where any one of the bubble players could go, such as Rush, Karcher or
Stephens. But Mason is a more polished, experienced player. He gives the
Lakers an athlete on the wing who would fit in well in their system.

	Andy Katz is a senior writer at ESPN.com.

		?

			ALSO SEE
			NBA draft order

			Nets weigh M&M's: Mihm and Martin

			Early-entry list for NBA draft has some surprises

			Draft: Top five players by position

			Draft: Who's advising these guys?

			Early-entry candidates for NBA draft

			Draft: Who could go in the first round

			[IMAGE]

		 ESPN.com:Help | Advertiser Info | Contact Us | Tools | Site Map | Jobs at
ESPN.com
		Copyright ,2000 ESPN Internet Ventures. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and
Safety Information  are applicable to this site.


This file does not contain Options or the future crosses that were done today.


>From: John Lewis <JOHNL@REVIEW.COM>

>To: "'sbryce@enron.com'" <SBRYCE@ENRON.COM>, "'mcausholli@hotmail.com'" <MCAUSHOLLI@HOTMAIL.COM>, "'james.puntumapanitch@enron.com'" <JAMES.PUNTUMAPANITCH@ENRON.COM>, "'jay.vandenberg@enron.com'" <JAY.VANDENBERG@ENRON.COM>, "'reno.casimir@enron.com'" <RENO.CASIMIR@ENRON.COM>, "'jay@hawthorn.net'" <JAY@HAWTHORN.NET>, "'todd@renaud.cc'" <TODD@RENAUD.CC>, "'annex_28@hotmail.com'" <ANNEX_28@HOTMAIL.COM>

>Subject: The Princeton Review Enron GMAT Course

>Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:50:05 -0500

>

>The purpose of this email is to confirm your enrollment in The Princeton

>Review Enron GMAT course. Your GMAT class will be held in ECN 560, which is

>in the old Enron building. The first meeting (November 26th) will be held

>from 6-10 PM, but all other sessions will be from 6-9 PM. If you have any

>questions, please feel free to call. Good luck!

>

>John Lewis

>Director of Course Operations

>The Princeton Review - Houston

>(713)688-5500

>JohnL@review.com

>

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Shiela K stated that this meeting should last no more than 3 hours, however was not sure on the time.  She stated that more details are to come


Dave Ryan and Todd Cook have a weather presentation today at 11:30 in Mt. Bachelor.  Food will be provided!


Tana:

Please feel free to extend the invitation to any Enron employees who may be
interested in the presentation.  1st come, 1st serve.

Thanks,
Sylvia

----- Forwarded by Sylvia Hu/Corp/Enron on 07/14/2000 03:17 PM -----

	Tana Jones@ECT
	07/13/2000 07:39 PM

		 To: Sylvia Hu/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Westlaw Luncheon - Thursday, 7/27  at EB 47C2  12 - 1:30 PM

Is this only available to the Legal Group?  There are a few people in Credit
and Global Contracts that might find this helpful.  Please add me to the
list.  Thanks!

	Sylvia Hu@ENRON
	07/13/2000 05:51 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie McMurray/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: (bcc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Westlaw Luncheon - Thursday, 7/27  at EB 47C2  12 - 1:30 PM

Westlaw has a new product - Westnews out on market in competing with Lexis'
Company Dossier on Lexsi-Nexis Universe.   You will have an opportunity to
learn Westnews from Michael Springler, Westlaw Attorney.  The presentation on
Westnews will be held at Conference Room EB47C2 on Thursday, from 12:00 noon
- 1:30 PM.  Lunch will be provided by Westlaw.  Please R.S.V.P. to Sylvia Hu
( x36775) or (email) by noon, 7/26.

Uncover relationships between people and businesses by searching Westnews and
public records on Westlaw.

Resources available include:
Company Profiles / People Finder / Asset locator
Corporate and Limited Partnership Records
Bankruptcy filings / UCC filings / Lawsuit filings
and more than 6,000 news and business publications,
including The Wall Street Journal.

Sylvia Hu
Corporate and Law Information Services
x36775


Mark, thank you. We would request that in Paragraph 3 the "Except as
otherwise provided" languge be deleted and the language below be added in
replacement.

"The parties acknowledge and understand that this agreement does not limit
or restrict the ability of either party to engage in its respective
business, nor does it limit either party's use or application of any
information or knowledge acquired independently of the other without breach
of this agreement in the course of such business.

Is this acceptable?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Fogel, Stephen
Cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com
Subject: RE: TradeSpark NDA

Stephen -

The below language is acceptable; however, I would suggest it be placed as
the first sentence of Paragraph 3, if it remains TradeSpark's position that
the existing first sentence of this paragraph (beginning with "Except as
otherwise provided ....") is to be deleted.  If the existing first sentence
is to remain, the language you propose should be added as the second
sentence of paragraph 3.

Please confirm the above and I will move forward on finalizing the
agreement.

Thanks for your cooperation.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com

                    "Fogel,

                    Stephen"             To:
"'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'"
                    <SFogel@canto        <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com>

                    r.com>               cc:     Michael.Bridges@enron.com,

                                         Tana.Jones@enron.com

                    02/26/2001           Subject:     RE: TradeSpark NDA

                    05:22 PM

I believe I understand your concerns - I would like to suggest that we add
the following language after the first sentence of Paragraph 3 - and then
execute the Agreement.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:55 PM
To: Fogel, Stephen
Cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com
Subject: TradeSpark NDA

Stephen -

Since we keep missing each other, I wanted to drop you a note about the
comments TradeSpark made to the Enron NDA.

As to the comments:

Paragraph 1 - The changes are acceptable.

Paragraph 3 - The rationale for this deletion needs to be provided.  I
cannot see why this change was made or is necessary.

Paragraph 5 - This deletion is unacceptable to Enron.

When you get a chance, please call me to further discuss Paragraph 3.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 3/30/00.

Regards
Molly


All ext tables should be deleted by triggers ( Enpower-PWR#401 )
    Tantra said the triggers are in TESTN, I can not see them because of my
    permissions. I can trace the problem if I get more info which is the
database
    instance and what is the error message.

      Thanks,
      Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Smith, Will F.
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 5:31 PM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Symes, Kate; Poston, David; Davis, Pete; Luu, Duong
Subject: Deleting FSP Strips

Kroum,

Users are having difficulty deleting term strips in Deal Entry due to the
existence of deal_strip_setlmt_ext records.  Is Deal Entry supposed to delete
these records explicitly or are we supposed to have a trigger in place to
handle this?

Thanks,
Will


FYI and Ken's review (no offense, John).
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/01/2001 01:46
PM ---------------------------
From: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 05:45 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: TECO Term Sheet

Attached is the draft term sheet for the Midway toll.  I have pulled in the
language from the earlier draft and incorporated Black Hills language where
applicable. I have left the pricing blank for now, subject to a refresh from
structuring.

Let's discuss sometime tomorrow.

Fred


Approved

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lee, Dennis
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 8:28 AM
To:	Bodnar, Michael; Buehler, Craig; Cherry, Paul; Dasilva, Esther; Donoho, Lindy; Frazier, Perry; Lee, Dennis; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; Sheffield, Sandy; White, Angela
Subject:	Credit request Oneok Bushton Processing

Credit Approval Requested:

Shipper :		Oneok Bushton Processing, Inc.
Contract # :		25374
Service Type :	FT
MDQ:			12,500 Dth/d
Rate:			$0.10
Term:			February 1, 2002 through February 28, 2002

Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com


In a nutshell, what changed on this version?  I haven't compared it against the old one yet.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 1:03 PM
To:	Richardson, Stacey
Subject:	RE: Revised Pooling Point GTC

Not anytime soon, but within the next couple of weeks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE: Revised Pooling Point GTC

Thanks.  Do you anticipate any more changes to this version?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 11:51 AM
To:	Wallumrod, Ellen; Richardson, Stacey
Cc:	Thorne, Judy
Subject:	Revised Pooling Point GTC

Please use the attached GTC is place of the previously forwarded for all deals going forward.

 << File: PoolGTC1.DOC >>