Mark and Steve,

I'm forwarding this "FYI".......Chris's work looks great!  I'll coordinate
the filming they're interested in.  I may suggest they use Beth Steir, as our
people know her and she knows our system--I'll discuss this with Chris.

With further regard to Harvard, I'm working with two other big initiatives
with various faculty there, and trying to coordinate "Harvard with
Harvard"---that is, trying to keep all Harvard's faculty pursuing Enron
projects, in each other's respective "loops"..I've also been trying to keep
Pankaj Ghemawat in these loops out of respect to his position on Enron's
Advisory Committee.

Thanks!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
09:29 AM ---------------------------

Christopher Bartlett <cbartlett@hbs.edu> on 11/08/2000 08:59:56 AM
To: christie.patrick@enron.com
cc: jeff.skilling@enron.com, mwozny@hbs.edu
Subject: Enron case study

Dear Christie:

First I wanted to thank you belatedly for the excellent organization you
provided in setting up our meetings in Houston a couple of weeks ago.  The
information we got was right on target and Meg and I came back with full
notebooks and bulging heads.  It was a very useful and productive trip from
our point of view, and we very much appreciated your very professional
organization of the process.

Having worked on the drafts over the last couple of weeks, we have come to
the conclusion that the material is just too rich to fit into a single
case.  In dividing our story into two parts, we focused our first case on
the transformational story that unfolded during the 1990s, not only on the
strategic changes occurring within the company but also on the
organizational and managerial redesign that supported and drove those new
directions.  The second case will encapsulate some of that company
background, but will focus in more detail on the way in which the new Enron
environment sparked the Enron Online innovation.  I have used this approach
a couple of times previously, focusing on entrepreneurship at 3M and on
human resource management at Microsoft, and for your information I will
forward copies of those two-part cases as models of what we are working
towards.

The other thing I wanted to update you on was our plans to make these cases
as interactive as possible.  Given Enron's transition into the "new
economy" and particularly the focus of the Enron Online case, we feel it is
very important to develop these cases in a multimedia manner. This means
that we will try to provide links to video material, Websites, streamed
interviews, etc. wherever they can support the development of the story
line.  The videos you sent us following our last visit are a very good
starting point, but we should probably try to schedule videotaped
interviews with Jeff Skilling, Ken Lay, and Louise Packard for sometime in
the near future -- certainly before Christmas.

Thanks again for all your help and support in getting us this far.  Our
hope is that we can get some drafts to you over the next couple of weeks
for your review and input.  Meanwhile, Meg will be contacting you to see if
we can set up a day for the videotaped interviews.  We are greatly looking
forward to completing our work on this very exciting project.

Yours sincerely,
Chris Bartlett
 - 395017.doc
 - 300004.doc
 - 301002.doc
Christopher A. Bartlett
Harvard Business School
Morgan 465
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
U.S.A.
phone:  617-495-6308; fax: 617-496-5271
e-mail: cbartlett@hbs.edu


Sent docs again to INS last night with a return Fedex package to me.  I have
also got a Fedex package ready for the doorman to forward to the USVI....if
we get there, weathr permitting.

B
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Taylor <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com>
To: Bruce Hutt <bhutt@ankarcapital.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 10:21 PM
Subject: Bomba's Full Moon Party

>
>
>Bruce - I just had another thought (they come so rarely I feel a need to
pass
>them along as soon as it happens).  The Full Moon party we discussed before
is
>on Nov. 23.  Unfortunately it is in the BVI.  If your lawyer can get the
permit
>by Monday and Fed Ex it to us, we could still get over there (Bomba's Shack
is
>on the western end of Tortola - reasonably close to the USVI).  The boat
will
>have a cell phone but we won't have a number till Sunday at the earliest.
Be
>sure to bring the lawyer's number so we can call him Monday.
>
>Mark
>
>P.S.  -  My sympathies on your day at Federal Plaza.  My imagination isn't
up to
>the task of conjuring how miserable that must have been.
>
>
>


John:

Bases on the conversations I have over heard I understand there are discussions being held regarding the Enron Corp 1994 Deferral Plan and the value of the ENE stock held in those accounts related to a single sum distribution.  As you and I discussed previously I do not fault anyone for wanting to take their Deferred Values out subject to the 10% penalty.  After having struggled with the issue I do find a problem with the various interpretations of how the ENE stock should be valued.  Any method other than  the number of shares times the current market value is not fair to the thousands of Enron employee's who had ENE shares in there 401K account and were not afforded a look back option.  Some might say this is easy for me since I did not have ENE stock in either, but I do feel its a matter of treating everyone fairly.  Most employee's do not have access or knowledge of the Deferral Plan so it would probably go unnoticed, but that would not be equitable.  The solution in my mind, if the plan participants do not agree would be to deny an early single sum distribution which is a right, per my interpretation under the plan, this may encourage acceptance of the plans interpretation of the ENE stock valuation.  I appreciate your reading my input!


Suggested changes are highlighted below.

John Sherriff@ECT
04/24/2001 12:55 AM
To: (713) 529-7757, Ken Rice/Enron Communications, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Jeremy
Thirsk/AP/Enron@ENRON, Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Nicholas
O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/Enron@EnronXGate, Raymond
Bowen/enron@enronxgate, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carey
Sloan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT, Ted
Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, lkitchen@enron.co.uk
cc:

Subject: Draft Organizational Announcement about Japan

May I please have your comments if any on this draft by close of business
Wednesday.  We hope to have agreed on the Q&A's by then and to send it out
the announcement on Thursday.

John

To be sent to:  All Enron Europe, all employees in Japan,  all Global Markets
and all VPs and up around the company

Enron has established several wholesale businesses in Japan in the last year
including Metals,  Power Plant Development (via our investment in EnCom),
Coal,  LNG & Weather.   We see significant opportunities in each of these
businesses and we will continue to expand our presence in Japan in order to
capture these opportunities.  However, while Japan continues to make progress
towards a liberalized electricity market, significant barriers to power
trading remain under the current interim market structure.  Until further
tangible steps are taken to improve third party access for electricity in
Japan, we will suspend our power marketing efforts and focus on the
significant opportunities that currently exist in our other wholesale
businesses. [Any statement regarding our existing power sales commitment?]
Once the necessary regulatory changes have been completed we expect to
aggressively pursue Enron's traditional position as the leading buyer and
seller of electricity in every deregulated market.

We are making a number of organization changes in order to better align our
resources with the opportunities in the Japanese market.  [deleted text] Joe
Hirl our President of Enron Japan will move to the Global Markets group and
lead a team that will focus on developing all our Global Markets
opportunities in Japan especially Weather,  Oil,  LNG,  Coal, and
Shipping.    We expect to continue our general recruiting  of Japanese
nationals and as President of Enron Japan,  Joe will continue to provide the
overall business leadership to both recruiting and the Analyst and Associate
program in Japan.  The Finance origination team headed by Jeremy Thirsk will
continue to report to Joe and also move to Global Markets.  Our power trading
group led by Morton Erik Pettersen will transition into other roles around
Enron.  The Equity/FX/Interest rate team which is a part of Global Markets
has two employees in the Tokyo office today and they expect to expand their
efforts throughout the year.

The EnCom group, which is our power plant development business (with minority
partners) and headed by Carey Sloan will continue its efforts in developing
power plants in Japan.  We are pleased with the progress we are making on a
number of sites and EnCom will continue to report to the Enron Europe Office
of the Chairman.

Our Metals team headed by Kazunari Sugimoto will continue to report through
Enron Metals in London.

By May we expect Enron Credit to have two to three employees in Tokyo pursing
the Credit Derivative business.  These employees remain in  Enron Credit , a
part of Enron Europe.

EBS has two employees headed by Jim Weisser and this team expects to expand
by year end.

The Industrial Markets team also expects to have two employees in the Tokyo
office in the next couple of months.

In the last seven months the commercial support services for Japan have been
transitioned to London for support and this is not changing.  Jane McBride
heads the legal team and will continue to functionally report  to Mark Evans,
General Counsel in London.   The RAC function will continue to report to Ted
Murphy, head of RAC for Enron Europe.   The Risk Management and Accounting
team is headed by Jan-Erland Bekeng will continue to functionally report to
Fernley Dyson in London.  The  IT, HR,  Tax and real estate teams will also
continue to functionally report to London.

Nick O'Day who heads the Public Affairs group (Government & Regulatory
Affairs and the Public Relations) in Japan will report to the Enron Europe
Office of the Chair with a Public Relations functional reporting to Jackie
Gentle in London and a Government Affairs functional reporting to Rick
Shapiro in Houston.   We anticipate that his team's efforts will be primarily
directed to supporting the EnCom power plant development team but they will
also continue to provide support for Global Markets, EBS & Industrial Markets.

We have already made considerable progress in breaking into the Japanese
markets across a wide range of Enron businesses and we anticipate that this
will provide significant profit growth for years to come. Through these
current changes we can demonstrate our ability to be flexible and target our
resources where they will realise the most immediate value for the company.


I don't know who Frank Bayouth is, but the computer said it was unable to
send my little missive to him.  I'll try again and see if it recognizes you.
DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/13/99 09:32
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/13/99 09:21 AM

To: Frank Bayouth@Enron, Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Enron Tag Line Change

Q:  What has ECI done for me lately?  A:  Forced me to get new business
cards.  Thanks a lot.  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/13/99 09:20
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Office of the Chairman                           12/10/99 05:49 PM

Sent by: Office of the Chairman
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: Enron Tag Line Change

Dear Enron Employees:

 With the addition of communications to our core businesses, it is
appropriate for us to modify our existing tag line to simply "Endless
possibilities."  This change is effective immediately and replaces our
current tag line of "Natural gas. Electricity. Endless possibilities."

 To achieve our goal of a unified Enron brand, each employee has the
responsibility to make the Enron image a consistent and strong identity.
This is partially accomplished through correct application of the logo and
tag line.  A revised Corporate Identity Guidelines Book has been developed to
assist you in following the correct standards.  You may obain a copy of this
new book by completing a Forms Request and ordering Item #42629.    These
guidelines will also be made available electronically on the Brand Site at
home.enron.com.

 We'd like to take this opportunity to remind all of you about the importance
of maintaining a consistent look, especially with our stationery and business
cards.  It has come to our attention recently that some employees are having
these items produced by outside vendors and are not following the established
guidelines.  This must stop immediately.  Please use the internal resources
available to you for these items.  They will ensure that all guidelines are
followed correctly and consistently.  If you have questions on how to get
these items or on the guidelines, you may contact Marge Nadasky in Corporate
Identity at marge.nadasky@enron.com.

 One name, one company....one Enron.  Our recent reorganization brings us
another step closer to realizing this goal.  Please make sure you do your
part to protect and strengthen the Enron brand around the world.

 Thank you for your continued support and cooperation.

      Office of the Chairman


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 02:07
PM ---------------------------

Twyla_S._Strogen@DOM.COM on 05/15/2000 01:13:44 PM
To: Customer_Advisory_Board@DOM.COM
cc:
Subject: Notice

ATTENTION WEB E-SCRIPT USERS:

On Thursday, May 18, 2000, Web E-SCRIPT Users will be required to download an
updated
version of the plug-in to access the system.  You will be prompted to download
upon
launching the web page.  With slower connections, the download could take 20+
minutes.
Please contact the E-SCRIPT Help Line if you would like to receive a CD with
the
 plug-in.


I know this is way before your time, but ------
Our contact at EES is calling and asking for a copy of the confirmation for
this deal.  We never prepared one because it was coded not to be confimed.
Can you check with the trader and see if anyone up there remembers if this
was confirmed as part of something else or why it was marked not to be
confirmed or anything else about it.

Thanks!


Pamela,

	Please forward to me Brett's last e-mail so that I can make sure that I keep the report in the same format that you are comfortable with using.

						Chris

To:	Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Jennifer Johnson/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	HA_Finals

Chris will you be forwarding me the HA_Finals for EES and EEMC with Brett leaving the company?  Please let me know.  If so, will you forward me the lastest files you have for April.  Brett has already forwarded the 1st - 3rd.

Thanks,

Pam


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
02:25 PM ---------------------------

Peter F Keavey
04/12/2001 02:24 PM
To: Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Top Forty things You will NEVER hear a Southern Man say:

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
02:23 PM ---------------------------

"Peter Keavey" <pkeavey@hotmail.com> on 04/12/2001 02:23:25 PM
To: peter.f.keavey@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: FW: Top Forty things You will NEVER hear a Southern Man say:

>From: Anne Moisan <amoisan@internationalsos.com>
>To: "'pkeavey@hotmail.com'" <pkeavey@hotmail.com>
>Subject: FW: Top Forty things You will NEVER hear a Southern Man say:
>Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:09:59 -0400
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: John Hankamer
>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:35 PM
>To: Anne Moisan
>Subject: FW: Top Forty things You will NEVER hear a Southern Man say:
>
>
>compliments of Mr. Roark...
>
>
>The Top FORTY Things You Will NEVER Hear A Southern Man Say:
>
>
>Oh I just couldn't, she's only sixteen.
>
>I'll take Shakespeare for 1000, Alex.
>
>Duct tape won't fix that.
>
>Honey, I think we should sell the pickup and buy a family sedan.
>
>Come to think of it, I'll have a Heineken.
>
>We don't keep firearms in this house.
>
>Has anybody seen the sideburns trimmer?
>
>You can't feed that to the dog.
>
>I thought Graceland was tacky.
>
>No kids in the back of the pickup, it's just not safe.
>
>Wrestling's fake.
>
>Honey, did you mail that donation to Greenpeace?
>
>We're vegetarians.
>
>Do you think my gut is too big?
>
>I'll have grapefruit and grapes instead of biscuits and gravy.
>
>Honey, we don't need another dog.
>
>Who gives a damn who won the Civil War?
>
>Give me the small bag of pork rinds.
>
>Too many deer heads detract from the decor.
>
>Spittin is such a nasty habit.
>
>I just couldn't find a thing at Walmart today.
>
>Trim the fat off that steak.
>
>Cappuccino tastes better than espresso.
>
>The tires on that truck are too big.
>
>I'll have the arugula and radicchio salad.
>
>I've got it all on the C: drive.
>
>Unsweetened tea tastes better.
>
>Would you like your fish poached or broiled?
>
>My fiancee, Bobbie Jo, is registered at Tiffany's.
>
>I've got two cases of Zima for the Super Bowl.
>
>Little Debbie snack cakes have too many fat grams.
>
>Checkmate.
>
>She's too young to be wearing a bikini.
>
>Does the salad bar have bean sprouts?
>
>Hey, here's an episode of "Hee Haw" that we haven't seen.
>
>I don't have a favorite college team.
>
>Be sure to bring my salad dressing on the side. You All.
>
>Those shorts ought to be a little longer, Darla.
>
>And, the Number One thing you'll NEVER hear a Southern Man say:
>
>Nope, no more for me. I'm drivin' tonight
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Thank you for choosing to receive Continental Airlines OnePass statement
communications electronically. Your latest statement is now online, providing
a
summary of your mileage activity through December 3, 2000. To access your new
statement, just visit Your Account at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCna0rucu04x0GygM

If you have any questions regarding your account, please e-mail the OnePass
Service Center at mailto:onepass@coair.com and make sure to include your name
and OnePass number FE003899 in your e-mail message.

Sincerely,

Mark Bergsrud
Vice President, Marketing

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNFORTUNATELY MAIL SENT TO THIS ADDRESS CANNOT BE ANSWERED.
PLEASE DIRECT ALL INQUIRIES TO
mailto:ONEPASS@COAIR.COM

Note:
To modify your OnePass e-mail preferences, please login to Your Account at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCna0rucu04x0NR6
To unsubscribe from all OnePass e-mail programs, please visit
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eCna0rucu04x0v7K


Richard,

Thanks for the invitation. I have already made another commitment
but it's conditional on a few  related events (friends of friends
coming to town). If the other event is canceled, I shall be glad to
join you. I shall let you know in a few days.

Vince

Richard Weeks@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
01/16/2001 02:20 PM
To: alaina.metz@marchfirst.com, Anthony Mends/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Beth Perlman/enron@EnronXgate, Elisabeth Mends/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Karla Feldman/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Marie Thibaut/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Renee Smith/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tom Sinclair/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Paula Corey's birthday

You only thought the festive days were over

What a better way to start off the new year than to celebrate our good friend
Paula Corey,s birthday

We will have a little soiree at my house on Saturday January 27th, dinner
will be served at 7:00, please feel free to come out as early as you wish;
however if you arrive too early you may be requested to perform some ranch
chores.

Please feel free to bring a spouse or friend if you choose.  If you could
RSVP by Jan 23rd that would be great.

Directions to my house are as follows:

Take I45 north past The Woodlands towards Conroe

Take exit 83 Crighton road exit

Stay on feeder road through stop sign until you get to traffic light
(Crighton Road)

Turn right onto Crighton road cross railroad tracks

Go to 3rd street, about 1
 miles, and turn right, which is the only way you
can turn.  This is Kidd road; however most of the time the street sign is
knocked down.

Stay on Kidd road until it dead ends at Stidham and turn left.

Go to first street (Finnley) and turn left.

Go about 1 mile and Finnley will dead end.

Turn left onto Deer Trail and I will be the first house on the right

The address is 13710 Deer Trail and my house is about 1/10 mile off the road.

My home number is 936 273 3466

Thanks

Richard Weeks
Richard Weeks
ENRON BROADBAND SERVICES
PURCHASING PROCESSING MANAGER
OFFICE:713-853-6995
   CELL:713-516-2581
EMAIL:RICHARD_WEEKS@ENRON.NET


Sami, by copy hereof, I have asked Jeff Hodge to look into this matter.  He is at 36911.   Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arap, Sami
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 6:06 AM
To:	Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Cc:	Kishkill, Joe; Collonges, Remi
Subject:	Master Trading Agreements - Brazil
Importance:	High

Hi  Mark;

We just started discussions with Duke and El Paso regarding the execution of a Master Trading Agreement for Brazilian spot market deals (physical power deals).  I have already been informed by Duke's local counsel that Enron and Duke have executed some sort of a worldwide master trading agreement which may or may not cover Brazil.  Haven't heard from El Paso yet.  Who, in North America, could provide me with information on these Duke and El Paso agreements ?

Hope all is well.

Tks & Rgds,

Sami


---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES on 05/03/2001
09:48 AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 04/27/2001 06:17 PM

Date: April 27, 2001
To:  Jan Smutny-Jones, Steven Kelly, Katie Kaplan
Cc:  IEP Board Members
From:  Julee Malinowski-Ball
Re:  Legislative Status Report Week Ending 4/27

RECENT EVENTS

-- Rule #1: Never assume an issue is done until the ink is dry from the
Governor's signature (and even then you never know).  The Senate Republicans
agreed late this week to oppose SB 28x (Sher), which makes several
IEP-sponsored proposals to the siting process, due to a controversial
provision added in the Assembly Appropriations Committee regarding
unemployment compensation.  Assembly Republicans let it slide on process
because CMTA and the Chamber's objections to the egregious language was so
last minute.  Senate Republicans had more time to look at the issue and
agreed not to let it go forward.  Since they control of the final vote in a
bill requiring two-thirds, their united opposition stopped the bill, one
vote shy.  The author was granted reconsideration and discussions will be
on-going over the next week on how to proceed.  The best-case scenario at
this point is getting one Republican to drop from the ranks.  Worst-case
scenario is the bill dies, and our language gets picked up in another
vehicle starting the whole process all over again.  The more likely
scenario, however, lies somewhere in between.  Parties will agree to some
compromise language, send the bill back to the Assembly to make the
appropriate changes, then bring it back to the Senate for a clean vote.

-- Long-term contracting was moved to the front burner this week by Asm.
Wright (AB 57) and Senator Morrow (SB 997), both with different results.
Both measures, which are almost identical, set forth a criteria which, if
followed by an IOU when signing a long-term contract with an energy
supplier, would eliminate the need for a reasonableness review by the CPUC.
AB 57 passed out of the Assembly Utilities and Commerce committee with
little discussion and a few technical amendments.  SB 997 faced a longer,
more difficult hearing in front of Senator Bowen's Energy Committee.  IEP,
along with the three IOUs testified in support of the measure, while TURN
expressed great concerns with the concept of leaving the CPUC out of the
picture.  In the end, the Senate committee agreed to put the bill off for
further discussions, passed a motion in support of getting the appropriate
rule waver so the bill can be heard again after Friday's policy committee
deadline, and scheduled a stakeholder meeting for Thursday morning.  Senator
Burton announced on the Senate Floor Thursday morning, however, that all
requests for rule wavers would be denied.  AB 57 appears to be the only
active vehicle on this issue, and IEP will be at the negotiating table
providing input on the language as it moves forward.

-- AB 60x is scheduled for hearing next week in the Senate Energy Committee.
IEP met with committee staff this week, which revealed some possible
latitude in amending the bill.  IEP and other member company lobbyists will
be pushing hard for an opposed position from the rest of the committee
before the hearing Tuesday afternoon.  At this time, however, we do not have
any alternative language for the bill.  After further review by some IEP
member companies, the previously drafted amendments appear unworkable and
were withdrawn from consideration.  We anticipate on waiting to see where
the committee on Tuesday takes the issue before another attempt at drafting
alternative language.

-- SB 1x (Soto/Scott) was amended this week before its hearing in the Senate
Appropriations committee next week.  The new language finds a backdoor to
the price cap issue by imposing a 100 percent tax on the sale of electric
power that exceeds a base price of $80 per MW/hr.  CMTA, the Chamber and
CalTax will be coordinating strategy for the hearing with IEP and the
generators, but despite the bill's multiple constitutional and legal
problems, most admit the measure will move forward with little trouble.  A
new player on the scene will probably provide the most noteworthy testimony.
InterGen North America, which is developing a 900 MW power plant in Palm
Springs, plans on testifying that if this measure is signed by the Governor,
they will absolutely pull the project and go to Oklahoma.

-- Newly amended this week is AB 67x (Cardoza), which now makes it a felony
for a corporation that sells electricity or natural gas at unjust or
unreasonable rates. Sponsored by Lt. Governor Bustamante, the measure
establishes stiff fines and possible jail time, that could be subject to the
state's "three strikes" law.  AB 67x has already generated opposition from
Republicans and constitutional questions from legal experts.   Although
Cardoza noted that several aspects of the bill are unresolved and could
change, the intent will remain the same, and he insists that energy
companies that take advantage of Californians will still face significant
penalties.

-- SB 6x, (Burton), which establishes a State Power Authority, passed the
Assembly this week by a 48 to 28 vote.  The measure needs the Senate to
concur on the Assembly amendments before it heads to the Governor's desk.

-- Attached are the most recent legislative tracking reports for both the
special and regular sessions.  Please call if you need copies of any of the
bills.

UPCOMING EVENTS

MONDAY, April 30th
Senate Appropriations Committee
SB 1x (Soto) - excess profits tax
SB 30x (Brulte) - local government incentives

Assembly Energy Costs and Availability Subcommittee on Natural Gas Costs and
Availability
Informational Hearing

TUESDAY, May 1st
Senate Energy Committee
AB 60x (Hertzberg) - California First

MONDAY, May 7th
Senate Appropriations Committee
SB 64x (Costa) - biomass incentive

ON THE SENATE FLOOR
SB 28x (Sher) - siting proposals
SB 6x (Burton)  - State Power Authority

--end--

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - 2001 Tracking Report.doc
 - 2001 Tracking Report.special session.doc


Tell him we are sending his note on to the appropriate person.

MARY
CLARK
04/03/2001 03:23 PM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Computers

Steve, I need your help in responding to this question.

Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001 03:22
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sherri Sera                           04/03/2001 02:45 PM

To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Computers

---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001
02:46 PM ---------------------------

Anonymous

From: Anonymous on 04/03/2001 02:32 PM
To:
cc:

Subject: Computers

Since Enron and EBS are trying to cut costs and be more cost effective, why
would a vice president need an executive computer setup at home?  Especially
if they already have a laptop (provided by Enron)  they take home every night
and have taken advantage of the Click at Home program as well.  Since Enron
has gone through the expense of giving each and every employee the
opportunity of the Click at Home program, it seems to be a somewhat redundant
expense of which I might add is unnecessary in my opinion.

I feel it would behoove ALL EMPLOYEES, including executives, to be more
conscientious of costs and expenses to improve Enron's and EBS' bottom-line.
How can we ("Enron") be a world leading company if we don't have leading
world leaders that spend Enron's money as if it were there own.

I think it would be in Enron's best interest to set some guidelines regarding
expenses such as these.  Just because a person is an executive of the company
why should be allowed to have anything they want just because they can?

Thank you for your time and the opportunity to express myself.  Especially
since I am a shareholder also and care where the money goes.


Suggestions? Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip Borrowman [mailto:peborrowman@kc.wilsonco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:56 PM
To: Chuck Cheek (E-mail)
Subject: Peaker Plant

Chuck,

When in Houston, I mentioned we had a site near Clinton, Iowa, that may be
optimum for a peaker electricity plant.  We aren't totally sure where the
Northern Border Pipeline crosses the Mississippi but its got to be
relatively close.  We know several pipelines are in the area.  The ones
currently feeding this site are too small to serve a peaker plant, but they
have to be coming from a larger source nearby.  The site is also adjacent to
major electricity lines.

I'd like to take you up on your offer to put us in touch with someone at
Enron, to whom we can discuss the location and determine if there is any
interest on Enron's part in the potential project.  Of course, we're
interested in being involved where our services are needed.

Let me know who to contact.

Phil


Please see attached.

Regards,

Wendi Lebrocq
3-3835


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/05/2000 06:09
PM ---------------------------

"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com> on 09/05/2000 11:50:14 AM
Please respond to "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>
To: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Trond Aschehoug"
<taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"Susan J Mara" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Steve Ponder"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Scott Noll"
<snoll@thermoecotek.com>, "Roger Pelote" <rpelote@energy.twc.com>, "Rob
Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Randy Hickok"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>,
"Marty McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "Kent Fickett" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey"
<elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap Boyd"
<rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "Ed Tomeo"
<ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelsen" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Dean
Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Dave Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>,
"Curtis Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton"
<curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>, "Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn
Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Escalante"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Jeff Dasovich"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "Ward Scobee" <wscobee@caithnessenergy.com>, "Tom
Heller" <hellertj@apci.com>, "Ted Cortopassi" <TCortopassi@ogden-energy.com>,
"Robert Frees" <freesrj@apci.com>, "Pete Levitt" <Pete@calwind.com>, "Milton
Schultz" <bfpjv@c-zone.net>, "Frank Misseldine"
<fmisseldine@caithnessenergy.com>, "Ed Maddox"
<emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Doug Levitt" <SDL@calwind.com>
cc: "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
Subject: Fw: memo re EOB and CalPX FERC filings

Attached is a memorandum from Ellison & Schneider summarizing the California
EOB's FERC Bid Cap Complaint and the CALPX's Proposed Tariff Amendment on
bid caps.  Interventions are due Sept. 12 and Sept. 18, respectively.

Recently, IEP forwarded a Restructuring/Transmission Task Force
solicitatation seeking to raise funds to help fund IEP's intervention in
matters such as this.  To date, IEP has received two responses.  In the
absence of significant funding, IEP will be unable to utilize consultants to
help in the monitoring and filing of interventions in
restructuring/transmission matters.  We will endeavor to continue to keep
the members apprised of key issues through the use of in-house staff, but
resources will be limited and may make the preparation and filing of
interventions difficult.  For example, IEP is unlikely to file an
intervention at the FERC in response to the EOB and CALPX filings given time
and resource constraints.

If you are interested in funding additional support in this effort, please
respond ASAP to the solicitation distributed in August.  Thank you.

----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Brown <ABB@eslawfirm.com>
To: Steven Kelly (E-mail) <steven@iepa.com>
Cc: Douglas Kerner <DKK@eslawfirm.com>
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 5:27 PM
Subject: memo re EOB and CalPX FERC filings

> Steven: attached is the memo we discussed in Word format.
>
> Andrew B. Brown
> Ellison, Schneider & Harris, LLP
> 2015 H Street
> Sacramento, CA  95814
> Phone: (916) 447-2166
> Fax: (916) 447-3512
> mailto:abb@eslawfirm.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This communication and any accompanying
document(s)
> are confidential and privileged.  They are intended for the sole use of
the
> addressee.  If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised
that
> any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
> reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.  Moreover, any
such
> inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
> privilege as to this communication or otherwise.  If you have received
this
> communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
> indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.
>
>

 - 000901_IEP_memo_re_EOB-CalPX_FERC.doc


Probably not.  Let's communicate Breathitt's interest to Bone and stay out of
it for now.

Richard Shapiro
08/16/2000 08:42 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Bill Massey

Is this the right time to weigh ?

Steven J Kean
08/16/2000 06:56 AM
To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Bill Massey

I believe we should back Massey as well.  Who do we weigh in with now?

Joe Hartsoe@ENRON
08/15/2000 08:27 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Bill Massey

Steve/Rick/Jim  ---  Talked to John Anderson yesterday.  He had just gotten
off the phone with Massey.  Massey believes Linda B.  is spending time at the
White House lobbying to be Chair.   Have we decided whether to back either
and if so which?  I would prefer backing Massey.  Thoughts?   JOE
202.466.9150
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 08/15/2000
09:13 AM ---------------------------

janderson <janderson@elcon.org> on 08/14/2000 03:05:28 PM
To: jhartso@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Bill Massey

Joe,

As you are probably aware, Jim Hoecker is considering leaving FERC
relatively soon.  The President will then name a new Chairman.  Bill Massey
is quite interested in receiving the nomination.

Please call to discuss.

John


Fernley - attached as discussed, initial gas & power operating standards for
Houston.  We will use these as a basis for comparison with other offices and
ultimately the development of global standards across the company.

Sally - you may have seen these already but I wanted to make sure you had a
copy.

Call me with any questions or comments.


Mark,

I'd be grateful if we could have a short conversation today at a convenient time to suit you to discuss:

1. The West LB LC facility. Corp still has not formed a view on whether we can give the "no material litigation" rep. so we cannot revert to West LB. Apart from the ?55m potentially available from WLB, Enron Europe now have NO LC facilities available. This is hurting us. Even if the answer is negative, at least we could give WLB a clear answer and negotiate to draw down on the facility.

2. Wrongful trading comfort. The directors having taken independent advice and been told that some fairly low level comfort is needed from Houston, noise and nervousness is now growing at this end because it has not been forthcoming. I attach a draft which would suffice.

Can we please talk about how we can get Jeff McMahon to send this to Michael Brown.

3.ICI Counterindemnities and TXU: I discussed these with Jeff Hodge yesterday. Do you need anything more from me on these?

Thanks

							Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Mark (London Legal)
Sent:	01 November 2001 21:49
To:	Haedicke, Mark E.; Walls Jr., Rob
Subject:	ENRON EUROPE

Mark, Rob

My apologies for adding to your burden at this difficult time. However hopefully this might clarify our discussions of yesterday and enable us all to move on quickly.

Enron Europe and its directors are facing two related issues:

1. Continuing to trade

The directors of EEL and its subsids have to be satisfied that there is a reasonable prospect of avoiding an insolvent liquidation. This is a fairly low hurdle to pass and, in our situation, calls made on Corp. for cash have been promptly met and we have read the news today of a new confirmed facility so we already have a fair degree of comfort.

The directors meet with independent counsel tomorrow but I believe that they will probably come out of that session asking for nothing more than a confirmation, by email to say Michael Brown, but from the top - Jeff or Greg, of where they currently see things, ie a positive prognosis for the future. That piece of electronic paper should be enough to enable the directors to reasonably conclude that we are not hurtling into Chapt 11 and to continue to trade. It would also be very helpful if that email could confirm that Michael would be promptly informed if things took a downward turn.

I would be happy to draft a note but wonder whether the best way of quickly putting this to bed might be for a conversation to be had with Jeff/Greg to see what they would be prepared to say. That could then be drafted up and sent over.

2. Filing accounts

The directors of Enron Europe and its subsids cannot file accounts on a going concern basis unless they are comfortable they will have adequate funds in the medium term to run their businesses. The hurdle here is higher than in point 1 above as prospective cash shortages would require the accounts to be qualified long before the directors would have to stop trading under point 1 above. So more comfort will probably be required here, which could include further details of the new facility (drawdown conditions and maturity periods) and prospects for further facilities being signed. This would back up the usual support letter.

I should add that we have not actually received this year the usual support letter from Corp. addressed to Enron Europe and its subsids. I don't know if it has been formally requested but we will definitely need to see that document this time around. Could you please point me in the right direction for that?

We now have until the end of January to file the accounts so point 1 above is definitely the immediately crucial issue. We would however like to resolve the accounts issue as soon as possible. Perhaps we could liaise with Joel to get a letter drafted and then signed by Jeff or Greg?

That's it. It really boils down to requiring a bit more information from Corp. There is absolutely no desire to cause problems here, just a desire to put in place the right pieces of information (which we are sure are out there but we need to collect them in) which will safeguard the European directors personally and enable them to move on from these concerns to the more pressing business of Q4.

Many thanks.

								Mark


Hi Jeff.  I've always heard that California law is different than the rest of the country!

[Landwehr, Susan M.]  --Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:26 AM
To: Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Landwehr, Susan M.; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Comnes, Alan; Steffes, James D.; Alvarez, Ray; Novosel, Sarah; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: California AG Investigating Consultants

FYI. The California AG has announced that he is investigating conflict of interest charges against consultants who were involved with arranging DWR's long term power contracts. May be part of Davis' attempt to "re-negotiate" the contracts.  There's been some assertions that, under California law, any contracts negotiated by consultants with financial conflict of interests must be nullified.


Please see the attached email.  Interventions and protests are due on the
merger application by May 3 (60 days from the day we submitted the
application (March 3)).  Comments on the joint Open Access tariff are due on
March 24, but we anticipate more activity on the application rather than the
tariff.  We'll keep you posted on both proceedings as pleadings are filed
with FERC.

Please call or email me if you have any questions.

Sarah
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 03/08/2000
04:26 PM ---------------------------

"Matthew Estes" <MESTES@skadden.com> on 03/08/2000 04:15:40 PM
To: pfoxp@brattle.com, phanser@brattle.com, jhartso@enron.com,
paul.kaufman@enron.com, snovose@enron.com, jrutkows@llgm.com,
sbehrend@llgm.com, JPFEFFER@mail5.allegro.net, MESTES@mail5.allegro.net,
MNAEVE@mail5.allegro.net, WEmnett@mail5.allegro.net, frank_afranji@pgn.com,
jay_dudley@pgn.com, jim_eden@pgn.com, pamela_lesh@pgn.com, ccowan@sppc.com,
cwestadt@sppc.com, gporter@sppc.com, soldham@sppc.com, awenner@velaw.com,
bbruner@velaw.com
cc:

Subject: FERC Notice of Filing

For your information, our merger application has been noticed by FERC and
assigned Docket No. EC00-63.  The due date for
interventions/protests/comments is May 3, which is 60 days from the date of
our filing.

The Joint OATT filing also was noticed today and assigned a docket number of
ER00-1801.  The due date for protests/interventions/comments is March 24.

------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001 02:30 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lucy Ortiz                           04/02/2001 01:06 PM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Middle Marketing Presentation

Scott,
Is this the type of thing you're looking for?  If not, please let me know and
I'll see what I can dig up for you in my All Presentations Ever Made folder.

Regards,

Lucy


Kay,

Here are other comments from John Mable that did not make it into the draft
sent by VEPCO.

Heather
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 07:03
PM ---------------------------

John_Mable@dom.com on 07/27/2000 03:01:22 PM
To: ozzie.pagan@enron.com, Heather.kroll@enron.com, Nwodka@bracepatt.com,
Dutch_Bumgardner@dom.com, Gary_Edwards@dom.com, Jeff_L._Jones@dom.com,
mjlafrat@mwbb.com, Greg_Morgan@dom.com, Ed_Roarty@dom.com,
Tim_Talmadge@dom.com, Vern_Colbert@dom.com, John_Calder@dom.com
cc:
Subject: Edgecombe CT

On the draft just sent, I forgot the following:

     - Change deemed Scheduled hours from 700 to 900
     - Incorporate net 20 days for invoice payment
     - change half hour meter reading to one hour

Sorry about that.

John


---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 02:30
PM ---------------------------

Jim Schwieger
04/07/2000 01:58 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Interconnect Reimbursement Language

Kevin agrees with leaving the language in the agreement's.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 04/07/2000 01:08
PM ---------------------------

"Pilkington, Kevin" <Kevin_Pilkington@kne.com> on 04/07/2000 10:42:20 AM
To: "'Jim Schwieger'" <Jim.Schwieger@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Interconnect Reimbursement Language

I'm comfortable with the language.  I will get it pushed through on this
side.  Let's get it done.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Schwieger [mailto:Jim.Schwieger@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 10:35 AM
To: Pilkington, Kevin
Cc: Brad Blevins; Gerald Nemec; Steve HPL Schneider; Nathan L Hlavaty
Subject: Interconnect Reimbursement Language

Even though we have changed the reimbursement from 50 / 50 on both
interconnects
to each entity paying 100% of one interconnect I still feel the language
requiring either party to reimburse the other if operational circumstances
constrain the physical intent of the interconnect is still needed.  In this
way
both entities will be aligned in trying to insure both the receipt and
delivery
interconnects function as intended.  Please let me know if you disagree.

     Jim Schwieger