Dabhol notice: Govt has till Monday to respond
Business Standard, 04/06/01

Oregon Regulators: Elec Utils Will Be Able To Buy BPA Pwr
Dow Jones Energy Service, 04/05/01

USA: US POWER-Success spells trouble for Calif. energy traders.
Reuters English News Service, 04/05/01

UK Kickstarts Wind Pwr Development With 13 Seabed Leases
Dow Jones Energy Service, 04/05/01

USA: US POWER-Trust the forecast? Energy trading desks do.
Reuters English News Service, 04/05/01

USA: Ecuador to offer Oriente crude contract to Asia.
Reuters English News Service, 04/05/01

Greenpeace Readies Action Against Companies Opposing Kyoto Plan
Bloomberg, 04/05/01

Dabhol notice: Govt has till Monday to respond
Santosh Tiwary NEW DELHI

04/06/2001
Business Standard
2
Copyright (c) Business Standard

With little time left to respond to the arbitration notice served on it by
the Dabhol Power Company, the Union finance ministry has asked the law
ministry and the Maharashtra government to advise the Centre on the
counter-moves to be made.
The Enron-promoted company had issued a notice of conciliation and
arbitration for the non-payment of the December bill of MSEB of Rs 102 crore,
which had the state government as well as the Centre's counter-guarantee.
DPC has informed the Centre that it has to respond by 3.00 pm on Monday.
Maharashtra government sources said, "Thursday and Friday are holidays on
account of Moharrum and Mahavir Jayanti respectively. We will be able to work
on the notice only on Saturday. The Centre too will be able to take action
only on Monday as Saturday and Sunday are holidays."
Finance ministry sources said that the law ministry had earlier informed the
government that there was a case for Maharashtra seeking adjustment of
"availability penalty" from DPC against the outstanding bills and the Centre
was expected to fight it out in the international court of arbitration. They
further said that the Centre will respond to the notice well in time.
Sources also said that the Centre was contemplating the options through which
a long-term solution to the payment wrangle could be achieved.
The finance ministry was also firming up on its suggestion of the
possibilities of a re-negotiation of the counter-guarantee for a discussion
in the Cabinet, they pointed out. The Centre had made it clear earlier that
it was interested in finding a long-term solution to the problem by not
paying the December bill for which the GoI counter-guarantee was invoked by
the DPC, till the penalty issue taken up by the MSEB was settled.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Oregon Regulators: Elec Utils Will Be Able To Buy BPA Pwr

04/05/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- Oregon regulators Wednesday said that the state's
electricity restructuring legislation will not prohibit Enron Corp (ENE)
utility Portland General Electric and Scottish Power (SPI) unit PacifiCorp
from buying cost-based power from Bonneville Power Association for their
residential and small farm customers.
BPA, the federal agency that markets electricity from dams on the Columbia
and Snake Rivers, is scheduled to provide 259 megawatts of cost-based power
to Portland General and 135 MW to PacifiCorp, starting Oct. 1, the effective
date of the state's restructuring bill.
The bill required the Oregon Public Utilities Commission to determine by May
1 whether certain bill provisions would require the utilities to restructure
in such a way that they could not meet BPA eligibility requirements for
cost-based power.
"We've taken great care to make sure we didn't violate (BPA) standards. Even
though BPA's rates are going up, this power will still provide benefits for
residential customers," OPUC Chairman Ron Eachus said.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872;
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA: US POWER-Success spells trouble for Calif. energy traders.
By C. Bryson Hull

04/05/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

HOUSTON, April 5 (Reuters) - In downtown Houston's booming energy district
sit a few companies whose record earnings have made them fat targets for
regulators and politicians under pressure to make someone pay for
California's power crisis.
High energy prices and shrewd trading have earned Houston companies Dynegy
Inc. , Reliant Energy Inc. , El Paso Corp. and Enron Corp. huge profits,
higher rankings on the Fortune 500 list and happy stockholders.
But success has bred contempt and invited political and regulatory fire as
California reels from blackouts and rising power rates in a crisis that is
engulfing the U.S. West.
The power companies' troubles, on both the state and federal level, could get
worse if forecasts of a summer electricity shortfall become reality.
"I don't think Dynegy, Reliant and Duke and those people are out of the woods
yet. The regulatory policy is just not as mature yet," said Jerry Langdon,
who served on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) from 1988 to
1993. "While those are unregulated entities, they are being treated like
regulated entities."
Langdon, a FERC appointee by President Ronald Reagan who is now in the
natural gas industry, points to FERC's recent order to 13 power providers to
either justify high power prices in California or refund millions of dollars
to state utilities.
Dynegy and The Williams Cos. were hardest-hit, and are fighting refund orders
of $45.8 million and $29.6 million, respectively.
STATE TROUBLES FOR GENERATORS
And that is just at the federal level. Democratic Gov. Gray Davis of
California has already branded the power providers as "out-of-state
profiteers," and other politicians and regulators are investigating
anti-competitive practices and are proposing various sanctions.
The latest volley came Wednesday, when a group of California state
legislators proposed a windfall profits tax against power generators. Under
the bill, California would set a limit on the amount of profit generators
could make and would take any money earned above that level.
The bill's sponsors took particular aim right at Houston's generators.
"They have been gouging us, and it is time we gouged them. We're sick of
paying these outrageous bills to those Texans," California Assemblyman Dion
Aroner said.
The generators are adamant they sold their power properly, at market prices
they can justify.
"We'll continue to justify our operations and we'll take the uproar for what
it is. Will it get worse? It's hard to speculate," Reliant spokesman Richard
Wheatley said.
FEDERAL REGULATORY ENVIRONS FAVORABLE
The saving grace for the generators may be the Bush Administration's clear
hands-off approach to the California crisis, which it has declared a state
issue. Bush and FERC Chairman Curtis Hebert both opposes price caps.
And power producers could soon have two familiar and friendly faces on the
FERC. Bush last week appointed former Texas Public Utility Commission chair
Pat Wood III and Pennsylvania Public Utility Commissioner Nora Mead Brownell,
both of whom oversaw their states' power deregulation efforts.
"With the new appointments to FERC, I think it's pretty clear they are not
going to interfere with California," said John Herrington, a former energy
secretary in the Reagan administration who lives in California.
But if fears of a summer power shortfall come true in California and west as
expected, the Bush administration's stance could change, said former FERC
chairman and Clinton administration deputy Energy Secretary Charles Curtis.
"Those concerns will find a public expression, and they will likely be calls
for regulatory intervention," Curtis told Reuters. "The naked powers exist to
impose a greater regulatory discipline on the market.
"Whether they will be exercised or not remains to be seen," he said.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

UK Kickstarts Wind Pwr Development With 13 Seabed Leases
By Geoffrey T. Smith and Germana Canzi
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

04/05/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

LONDON -(Dow Jones)- The development of wind power in Europe's windiest
country passed a major landmark Thursday as the U.K. awarded seabed leases
covering 13 offshore wind farm projects.
If all the projects go ahead, they are likely to result in GBP1.5 billion in
investments and create an installed capacity of up to 1,500 megawatts,
according to estimates by the British Wind Energy Association. Now all the
projects must go through planning permission procedures which will take up to
three years. The first generation of wind farms won't be operational until
2004. Among the companies to be awarded leases were arms of numerous
established U.K. generators such as Innogy PLC (IOG), Powergen PLC (PWG),
Scottish Power (SPI), TXU Europe (TXU) and Edison Mission Energy, as well as
foreign companies with experience in their home markets such as German-based
EnergieKontor (G.EKT) and Denmark's Elsam A/S and NEG Micon A/S (K.NEG).
Energy trading giant Enron (ENE) and Royal Dutch/Shell (RD) were also among
the successful applicants, as were independent developers such as Warwick
Energy Ltd. and Seascape Energy Ltd..
The projects - seven in the Irish Sea and six in the North Sea - represent
the first concerted effort in the U.K. to raise the contribution of renewable
energy sources, other than hydropower, in the overall energy mix.
Most of the projects will be limited to around 30 turbines which, given
current turbine technology, will limit the capacity of individual projects to
less than 100 MW.
In contrast, companies in countries which have aggressively subsidized wind
energy, such as Germany and Denmark, already have plans for offshore
facilities promising well over 500 MW.
Geraint Jewson, a director of Celtic Offshore Wind Ltd., said he saw scope to
defer procurement until around 2003, when it may be possible to buy bigger
turbines, although PowerGen and Enron confirmed they have already opted for
current turbines in the 1.5-MW to 2-MW range. PowerGen has contracted Danish
company Vestas A/S (K.VWS) to supply its turbines.
Crown Estates and the BWEA are currently in negotiations over a second round
of licenses for larger sites but a spokeswoman for Crown Estates said there
is no timetable for awarding these leases yet.
The U.K. has led the world in deregulating its electricity market in the last
10 years, but policy-makers' concentration on making electricity cheaper for
consumers has tended to work against renewable sources such as wind, whose
generation costs have been traditionally higher than those for conventional
sources such as coal, natural gas and nuclear power.
Up until now, the prime contribution of wind to the U.K. energy sector has
been to blow the emissions of coal and gas-fired plants across the North Sea
to Norway, affecting the environmental consciousness of both countries
accordingly.
The recent introduction in the U.K. of new trading arrangements for the
wholesale electricity market has exacerbated this by pushing prices lower and
forcing companies to devote much greater resources to trading in near
real-time. This is something which is frequently impossible for small-scale
generators to do, especially when the source of the power is, by its nature,
unpredictable.
However, these difficulties may be at least partly addressed by 2004, when
all public electricity suppliers in the U.K. will be obliged to buy a certain
proportion of their supplies from renewable generation.
One element of wind power which won't be resolved by then is its volatility,
and the difficulties it makes for the grid operator who must balance demand
and supply in the system on a second-by-second basis.
A spokesman for National Grid Group PLC (NGG) said he didn't expect any major
complications from the first round of projects however.
"We can accommodate a fair bit of renewable generation before there are any
issues involved," he said. Even so, he warned that grid operators "will need
more timely information from renewable generators" over time to help it
balance the system.
-By Geoffrey T. Smith and Germana Canzi, Dow Jones Newswires; (+44 20) 7842
9260; geoffrey.smith@dowjones.com
(Andrea Chipman in London and Michael Young in Copenhagen contributed to this
article)

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA: US POWER-Trust the forecast? Energy trading desks do.
By Paul Thomasch

04/05/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

NEW YORK, April 5 (Reuters) - While it may be weeks or months before
temperatures really start soaring in California, weather forecasters are
already feeling the heat.
Once a profession where graduates took jobs in government, academia or
television and radio, forecasters are now finding they have a place in the
business world, too.
Agriculture and airlines have long employed meteorologists, but the advent of
power trading in the past decade has made it particularly true in the energy
business. Utilities have discovered that shifts in weather can quickly turn
into millions of dollars in profits or losses.
"In the financial community, utilities are thought of as the old, staid,
secure, dividend-paying stocks that you like to own," said Guy Dicciani, a
weather derivatives trader with Reliant Energy Wholesale Group, an
unregulated unit of Reliant Energy .
"But in the new deregulated world, a lot of energy companies are now subject
to wild swings in revenue. And the shareholders and institutions don't like
to be told that revenue is highly influenced by weather."
That, experts say, has made a good meteorologist a hot ticket.
BRIEFING FOR TRADERS
As California has shown, the stakes can be sky-high when it comes to
forecasting. The state's failed deregulation plan has pushed it into a power
crisis, causing rolling blackouts and threatening Pacific Gas and Electric
and Southern California Edison, units of PG&E Corp. and Edison International
, with bankruptcy.
Throw an unexpected heat wave into the mix this summer and the state's crisis
could quickly worsen.
That's where Mike Pass and his colleagues come into play.
After stints with the National Weather Service and on television in Texas and
Louisiana, Pass is now the senior meteorologist for Reliant's Wholesale
Group, leaving him the responsibility of briefing traders like Dicciani and
others on forecasts stretching as far forward as 15 days.
At the morning meeting, Pass said, a roomful of energy traders goes silent
when he starts talking about the weather.
"It starts out noisy, but when we're into that briefing, within seconds
everyone is paying attention."
The reason for such attention is not lost on him.
"Weather drives the power demand, and therefore weather is a critically
important issue to utilities," Pass said.
THE BOTTOM LINE
The energy industry's fascination with weather forecasting stretches beyond
companies such as Reliant, Enron Corp. and Aquila Inc. , which have hired
their own staffs of meteorologists.
It has also been a shot in the arm for companies such as AccuWeather Inc.,
which employs more than 90 meteorologists.
Founded by Dr. Joel Meyers, considered a pioneer in the business, the company
provides forecasting services to 150 companies on the Fortune 500.
Its clients also include 50 to 75 energy companies, some of which are
provided with tailor-made updates by the hour.
"Clearly in determining gas usage and electricity load, weather information
is critical," said Meyers.
"We've been told our forecasts can make a swing of half a million dollars a
day in the bottom line."
For students of meteorology - about 800 graduate each year with either a
bachelors, masters or doctorate degree - the rise in energy-related jobs has
been a welcome relief.
"In the past few years, the impact of the private sector on the field has
been widespread," said Keith Seitter, deputy executive director of the
American Meteorological Society, and a former professor of meteorology.
"A lot of industries are becoming more and more aware that their business is
weather sensitive, and are willing to pay for that information," he said.
PAY'S STILL LOW
But few people go into the field thinking about dazzling jobs in the business
world. Rather, meteorologists just love the weather, according to Seitter.
"The people who go into meteorology can't imagine doing anything else."
And they'll do it regardless of the pay, which can start as low as $25,000 a
year.
Bill Syrett, who manages the weather observatory at Penn State University,
which has graduated about one in every four meteorologists now working, warns
parents of prospective students that their kids aren't likely to get rich on
the weather. Even with jobs popping up in energy and trading.
"The curriculum here - and at most schools that have a reputable program -
emphasized math and physics. It's kind of the same as the curriculum for
engineers," said Syrett.
"But what I tell parents of students is their kids will start at half the
pay."
So what's the problem?
"We're penalized for our passion," he said.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA: Ecuador to offer Oriente crude contract to Asia.

04/05/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

NEW YORK, April 5 (Reuters) - Ecuador will announce a tender to sell an Asian
term contract for Oriente crude oil this Friday, state Petroecuador said.
"The council will decide by Friday on the conditions and terms of the
tender," a Petroecuador official said.
Ecuador sells its Oriente crude through 11 one-year term contracts.
The 12,000 barrel per day (bpd) Asian contract going on tender was previously
held by Korean refiner LG International.
LG International has a second one-year term Oriente crude contract of 18,000
bpd that should expire in September or October, depending on the last loading
date, Petroecuador said.
Other firms holding Oriente contracts include Texaco Inc, which receives
24,000 bpd; Japan-backed Arcadia Petroleum for 24,000 bpd; Swiss trading
Glencore International AG for 12,000 bpd; Enron Corp holds 12,000 bpd;
Uruguay's state oil firm ANCAP with 12,000 bpd, while Nicaragua's state owned
company receives 12,000 bpd.
Petrotrin, Trinidad and Tobago's oil company, is expected to sign a contract
for 12,000 bpd of Oriente later this month.
Terms of the ongoing contracts include a $25 million prepayment, and a fixed
discount of $8.75 a barrel to West Texas Intermediate (WTI) to guarantee a
$20 floor price.
The contract going on tender will have a price differential pegged off Oman
crude.
Petroecuador currently exports about 126,000 bpd of Oriente crude, which is
expected to rise to 138,000 bpd if the Petrotrin contract is signed.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Greenpeace Readies Action Against Companies Opposing Kyoto Plan
2001-04-05 11:48 (New York)

Greenpeace Readies Action Against Companies Opposing Kyoto Plan

     Amsterdam, April 5 (Bloomberg) -- Greenpeace International,
an environmental pressure group, said it's preparing a campaign
against the top U.S. companies opposing a plan to fight global
warming agreed in Kyoto, Japan, four years ago.
     The Amsterdam-based environmental group called on the top
100 U.S. companies to state publicly they support the plan or to
``face the consequences.'' The group stopped short of outlining
any specific threat, saying only that it was soliciting views of
companies at this point.
     The comments underscore the depth of anger by environmental
groups to U.S. President George W. Bush's decision last week to
back away from the Kyoto plan. That plan would force industrial
nations to cut smokestack emissions blamed for hurting the
earth's climate by 5.2 percent from 1990 levels by 2012,
something Bush says would be too costly for industry and
consumers.
     ``It's a clear warning,'' said Bill Hare, policy director
for Greenpeace's climate change program. ``There are many things
Greenpeace could do. We don't announce our actions in advance. A
boycott is only one of many options. We want to see what the
companies say about their policy on global warming.''
     European Union officials are hoping to jump-start talks to
implement the Kyoto plan ahead of a meeting of world environment
ministers in July in Bonn. Dutch Environment Minister Jan Pronk,
who is mediating the Kyoto talks, plans to issue a proposal on
how to restart talks within the next few days. He meets with
fellow ministers and civil servants in New York on April 21.

                          No Sanctions

     The EU is holding back from backing any sanctions against
the U.S., which spews a quarter of the pollutants that would be
restrained under the Kyoto plan. It wants to see alternative
proposals on fighting global warming.
     ``I don't think it's time now to talk about sanctions,''
Margot Wallstroem, the EU environment commissioner, said at a
briefing in Brussels. ``When they come to Bonn and give their
view, from then on it's time to decide what to do.''
     Greenpeace is sending a questionnaire to the 100 biggest
U.S. companies, named by Fortune Magazine, about whether they
support the Kyoto plan and how they feel about Bush's opposition.
The group plans to publish its findings to inform its 2.5 million
supporters and lay the groundwork for a campaign.
     Exxon Mobil Corp., the world's biggest publicly-traded oil
company, leads the Fortune list of top 100 companies and is one
of the most visible critics of efforts to cut emissions from
burning fuels including oil, natural gas and coal. Others such as
Enron Corp., which is No. 7 on the Fortune list, support the
Kyoto plan.
     Wal-Mart Stores Inc., General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co.,
General Electric Co., Citigroup Inc., International Business
Machines Corp., AT&T Corp. and Verizon Communications Inc. also
lead the Fortune list. Greenpeace said its members are frustrated
they have no voice in opposing Bush's stand on environmental
issues.
     ``The American people can register their opinions at the
ballot box, but for the rest of the world all we can do is
register our opinions via the marketplace,'' said Gerd Leipold,
executive director of Greenpeace International. ``From the mail
and phone calls we've been receiving, it's clear the public wants
to do just that.''

--Reed V. Landberg in the London newsroom 44-20-7330-7862 or
landberg@Bloomberg.net/pnt


Tana:

None of the following CPs are authorized to trade US power:

Agave Energy Company - restricted by credit
Cargill Energy Trading Canada, inc. - not a current trading partner/not Ferc
approved
Lyondell Chemical Worldwide Inc. - restricted by credit

Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation is authorized for ENRON SALES only for
all US power products (pursuant to the on-line GTCs).
Sithe Power Marketing, LP is approved to trade US power products pursuant to
the on-line GTCs with collateral.

Leslie


The changes look fine to me.

Kay


-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Hawthorn [mailto:jay@hawthorn.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:53 PM
To: Suarez, John; buckg@sbcglobal.net; Zimmerman, Grant; Woulfe, Greg;
Richard Schneider; Susan Edison
Subject: Enron Voicemail

http://www.witcity.com/enron/


535228 - broker fee added per Tom Alonso

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
03/26/2001 01:08 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb fees

kate can you check on these 2 deals

517814 broker has fee of .0075

535228 broker has fee of .0075

thanks


Start Date: 2/23/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022311.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:   5.49 / Final:   4.92)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/23/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  50.16 / Final:  45.76)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/23/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred: 205.08 / Final: 210.08)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/23/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Hector,

Thank you for the installation, however, do you know who I should contact in
regards to the monitors?

Thanks

Kim Hillis
x30681

Hector Ruiz
05/18/2000 05:19 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jessica Ramirez/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: The installation of the equipment you ordered is completed

--- Automatic Notification System ( Request #: DRUF-4KDGW7 )
Requested For: John J Lavorato
Requested By:  Jessica Ramirez

The installation of the equipment (see below) has been completed.

EN 6600 128mg MEMORY
EN 6600 DESKTOP


This was sent to me by one of the developers.  I believe it relates to an
expansion (or new interconnection) of the Caledonia facility.  I don't know
which lawyer has been working on it, so I'm sending it around to see if
anyone claims it. Chris thought that someone from Power Trading may have been
working on it.

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/10/2000 02:16
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           10/10/2000 12:48 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

Kay,

This is the format for the land options that Robert Shaw of New Century is
using in Caledonia, MS.  Please advise if these documents are appropriate.

Thanks,

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Booth/NA/Enron on 10/10/2000 12:42
PM ---------------------------

Mona Harvey <harveym@ncess.com> on 10/10/2000 11:20:08 AM
Please respond to "harveym@ncess.com" <harveym@ncess.com>
To: "Chris Booth (E-mail)" <Chris.Booth@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Option Agreement and Easement

Chris,
 Robert Shaw asked me to send these documents to you.

Please call either of us at 713-757-9771 if you need additional information.

Sincerely,
Mona Harvey

 - Easement - Caledonia Project (3-9-00).doc
 - Option to Purchase ROW-Caledonia Project (3-9-00).doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/15/99 01:38 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Mark Taylor                           10/15/99 12:48 PM

To: gpier@doubleclick.net>
cc:
Subject: Hi Greg!

We are getting very excited about the BVI.  It's hard to believe it's only 5
weeks away.  I try to think about it whenever the stock market gets me
depressed (which is happening with altogether too much frequency these
days).  I see you guys got hit with a triple whammy today.  Oh well, can you
say "buying opportunity"?

I'm coming to NYC for a conference in a couple of weeks - any chance you guys
are free for dinner on Sunday the 31st?  We also need to talk about $
sometime soon since I made the final payment on the boat a couple of weeks
ago.  Have you made your hotel arrangements (we still have a room reserved
for you for the night of the 20th which you won't need if you've made other
arrangements - and we can always get you a room there for the last night if
you want)?   And there's still the beverage list (you did get my fax, didn't
you?).

T. sends regards.  Hope you're well and not letting the market roller-coaster
get you down (my mantra is "think long term, think long term, think long
term").

Mark


Steven,

Thank you for visiting with my class at Rice last night. They thoroughly
enjoyed your talk -- after you left for the evening, we had a good
discussion on topics that you had raised. My apologies again for the room
mix up; somehow between myself, the university, and my secretary, the
classroom assignment changed several times and the update did not get to
you.

Next year, if your schedule permits, perhaps you would consider a return
engagement. I would certainly enjoy having you back.

Regards,
John

John A. Baker
Director of Information Technology
Fisher-Rosemount / Daniel (A Division of Emerson Electric)
9753 Pine Lake Drive
Houston, TX 77055
713-827-3328
John.Baker@daniel.com


While we have always put our values of Respect, Integrity, Communication and
Excellence at the center of our company, today marks a renewal of our
commitment to those values, and to one value in particular, Communication.

Your feedback in the last Excellence Through Communication survey indicated
that we could do better job of communicating. With several initiatives
underway, we,ve been working hard to improve communication at Enron.

Please access IP-TV to hear a special message from Ken Lay about our
initiatives and our commitment to improving communication.  To view the
message, you must have IP-TV and a sound card installed on your computer.

Following are instructions for launching IP-TV by company LAN and/or location:

EI employees in Three Allen Center
 Start Menu...Programs...General Information...IPTV Icon

EES and Omaha employees
 Start Menu...Programs...Cisco IPTV Viewer...IPTV Icon

ENA Houston, Corp Houston, New York, Calgary and Portland (does not include
EBS and PGE in Portland)
 Start Menu...Programs...IPTV Viewer Icon

GPG Three Allen Center and HR users logging on to OTSNT01
 Start Menu...LAN-Apps...OTS...IP-TV

GPG users logging on to OTS-2
 Start Menu...Enron Applications...IP-TV

London and Europe employees will hear from their IP-TV administrators on how
to view the video.

Once you launch IP-TV, double-click the program titled "Ken Lay,s Values
Message".

If you have any difficulties locating or using IP-TV viewer, please contact
your help desk.

If you do not have IP-TV on your computer, please e-mail Gina Taylor at
gina.taylor@enron.com to checkout a video of Ken,s special message.


Amerex checked out incorrectly - Mike Driscoll just talked to the broker, who
was aware of that and said they would re-check out. Let me know if he
communicates this to his back office.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
01/12/2001 11:24 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 1/12/01 Checkout

Amerex

Mike Swerzbin
deal 496303
Amerex shows Enron as sell

deal 496304
Amerex shows Enron as buyer


Good afternoon:

You will find information on the Assembly Republican Plan R, as well as two
recent letters from Mr. Cox and Mr. Brulte to Governor Davis.

This information can be accessed at www.assembly.ca.gov and then click the
Republican caucus link.

If you have any questions, please call me.

Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005


We really do need to understand the scheduling of this,  if alternates
haven't been scheduled, IT are and now an LFT---  seems a little
questionable, so we need to understand the answer.  Also without knowing the
receipt point how do we know the deal can be done as LFT??  MK

Mary Darveaux
11/16/2000 05:34 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: TW Negotiated Rate Filing

I forgot to add that this is an LFT.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron on 11/16/2000
05:18 PM ---------------------------

Mary Darveaux
11/16/2000 04:50 PM
To: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Barbara Bischoff/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW Negotiated Rate Filing

Alas- a negotiated Rate Filing with a few days notice!!!!

TK has done it again  Negotiated Rate deal with Sempra
   December 1 thru December 31
   Rate $1.00
   10,000/day
   Receipt Point  ____?  (to be provided)
   Delivery Point  PG&E Topock

I will prepare the filing for November 30th.  Barb, please add to our filing
log.


All:

Attached for your convenience is the CWT memo.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


yes.  That's okay.
Carol


Kim,

The book should reflect that as long as the spread is positive we will be long actual fuel multiplied times the Dynegy volume.  If the spread covers fuel, we will be long the Dynegy volume plus the additional volume. (approximately 20,000).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Saturday, August 25, 2001 1:40 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Neubauer, Dave
Subject:	Fuel Risk on Index to Index Deals

Steve and Dave,

As a follow up from our meeting on August 16, we all had the question about what, if any, price risk we had on the fuel portion of the Index to Index deals.  Here are my thoughts...

For purposes of this discussion, let's just talk about how the Dynegy, San Juan to SoCal Needles firm transport for 35,000 MMBtu/d for Calendar 2003 could impact our fuel risk.  Dynegy will not be giving us fuel in-kind for this transaction.  All fuel needed for scheduled volumes on this contract will have to be provided by TW.   In a normal year TW over collects approximately 25,000 MMBtu/d in fuel.  Because we will now need some of this over collected amount to provide the fuel for the Dynegy deal, we actually have something less than the 25,000 MMBtu/d for the total 2003 fuel over collection.  To make the math easy to follow for purposes of discussion, let's assume after all of the Index to Index deals for 2003, we will only have 20,000 MMBtu/d of over collected fuel on the system.  We will need the remaining 5,000 MMBtu/d as fuel for the Index to Index deals.  Let's also assume that we have hedged or plan to hedge (by means of the whole calendar year, seasonally or monthly) the 20,000 MMBtu/d of 2003 over collected fuel.  The remaining 5,000 MMBtu/d of over collected unhedged fuel is what will be used to provide the fuel for the Dynegy deal.

It is my thought that the price risk question surrounds the 5,000 MMBtu/d of the remaining over collected fuel that is not hedged.   On any day where Dynegy would schedule the full 35,000 MMBtu/d to flow, the fuel actually burned on that day for Dynegy would have the same value as all other shippers who provided in-kind fuel on that same day.  The other shipper's in-kind fuel (I'm referring to the 5,000 MMBtu/d that is not hedged) is what is actually used to provide fuel for Dynegy.  On this particular day, we do not have additional adverse price risk.  However, on any day that Dynegy does not have the full 35,000 MMBtu/d scheduled to flow, we have an opportunity loss on the value of this fuel.  If Dynegy does not flow all or any volumes on their contract on any given day, there is no fuel burned.  This means that we now have extra gas, that was not previously hedged, in the pipe provided by the other in-kind shippers that we do not need for Dynegy on this particular day.  Now we are subject to selling this extra gas at current cash prices verses having the ability to hedge this volume ahead of time at a price that we felt meet our fuel hedging strategy, thus creating an opportunity loss.

Would you agree that our risk is when Dynegy does not flow?  Would you agree that there is no additional price risk when Dynegy does flow?

Thanks, Kim.


This is not good news. As you know, this financing was very important in
helping to solve the liquidity problem. John did tell me that they had good
meetings with the Embassy this week. My experience with OPIC tells me that
with a change in administration in Washington and the concerns John mentions
in his memo, we should not count on the financing. Thanks, Joe
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/14/2000 04:30 PM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  John Hardy                           09/14/2000 02:40 PM

To: Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Update on Azurix - Buenos Aires water project

Joe
 As an update to my earlier email on the Azurix water project, Azurix has
suspended OPIC's consideration of the project until either we are able to get
a more positive cable out of the US Embassy in Argentina or George moves on -
probably in late January.
 But the OPIC pullback together with the publicity about Rebecca's departure
has caused serious concern on the part of IDB which is now pulling back.  The
IDB has made it clear that they are concerned about Enron's intentions
regarding Azurix.  I have talked to Azurix about seeking some statement of
support from Enron so that we can address this issue head on.  You may well
be getting some communication from John Garrison on this issue.  If we can
get back on track Azurix may be able to get IDB Board approval this fall.
 Hope you are well.  thanks John


Doug,

Trying to keep you up to speed.

LBC
----- Original Message -----
From: <scaraway@txu.com>
To: <gward1@txu.com>
Cc: <wms@ercot.com>; <CSCWorkingGroup@ercot.com>; Conto, Jose
<JConto@ercot.com>; Cunningham, Lance <lance.cunningham@enron.com>;
<Lancecunningham@houston.rr.com>; <lreiter1@txu.com>; Connolly, Mike
<mike-connolly@reliantenergy.com>; Lin, Martin <martin.lin@enron.com>;
Siddiqi, Shams <shams.siddiqi@lcra.org>; Agrawal, Laliya
<laliya-agrawal@reliantenergy.com>; <jhenry@reliant.com>;
<rlettie2@txu.com>; <gward1@txu.com>; Carlson, Trent <tcarlson@reliant.com>;
Saathoff, Kent <KSaathoff@ercot.com>; Bian, Jessica <JBian@ercot.com>;
Adams, John <jadams@ercot.com>; Myers, Steven <smyers@ercot.com>; Jones, Dan
<dljones@cps-satx.com>; <kdonohoo@ercot.com>; <lwestbrook@txu.com>;
<paul-rocha@reliantenergy.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:37 PM
Subject: Report From The CMWG

> Jerry,
>
> The subgroup of the Congestion Management Working Group (CMWG) which has
> been performing power flow studies and analyzing the zonal weighted
average
> shift factors, held a conference call this afternoon to review the work
> done by different members of the subgroup recently.  This conference call
> also included members of the TXU & Reliant TDSPs who have reviewed and
> offerred input into the process.
>
> During the conference call we reached a consensus of what values to use
for
> the 2002 summer on-peak TTC ratings for the CSCs in the direction of base
> flow (i.e. for West to North flow on the Graham to Parker CSC, for South
to
> North flow on the Temple to Sandow CSC, and for South to Houston flow on
> the STP to Dow CSC).  These TTC limits are shown in the PowerPoint
> presentation attached below.  Additionally, I have included a list of the
> Boundary Generators and restated the CREs for each CSC by which CREs are
> Closely Related Contingencies and which CREs are Closely Related Monitored
> Elements.
>
> With the work that was done by this subgroup recently, we now have a high
> degree of confidence that the CSC flows predicted by the Zonal Average
> Weighted Shift Factors match very closely what is observed by power flow
> software.  Therefore, the doubt that we had earlier on this issue has been
> resolved.
>
> One issue that was raised during today's conference call that needs the
> attention of the WMS is, will TCRs be sold in both directions on the CSCs?
> If so, then TTC limits in the opposite direction will need to be developed
> as well.  Ken Donohoo said that there has been some discussion on this
> issue by different stakeholders this week and that clarity is needed.
>
> One last note on the CREs shown in the PowerPoint presentation, please
> review it to determine if all changes that were discussed at Monday's CMWG
> meeting are reflected.  I know that the ones in the Austin area have been
> removed; however, Jose Conto thinks that a couple were agreed upon to be
> added at that meeting; however, he wasn't sure which ones they were.
> Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.  Thanks
>
> Shannon
>
> (See attached file: CMWG Subgroup Results For TTCs and CREs.ppt)

 - CMWG Subgroup Results For TTCs and CREs.ppt


Your recent voice mail message to me indicated that you maintain a list of board positions held by VP's and above.  I thought that it might be helpful to have this in writing to add to your list.  Beginning with a fiscal year that starts April 2001, I am now a member of the Board and President-Elect of National Charity League, a mother-daughter community volunteer organization.

We have over 300 members, including mothers and their daughters in grades 7 through 12, in the Spring/Champions area.  We run bingo games in local nursing homes, provide "coaching" during practices for Special Olympics volleyball, tennis, track and bowling, stock local food pantries, work with children in after-school programs in the local elementary schools, etc.  It is a great way to create common goals for mother and daughter teams with a focus on others, at a time when girls would otherwise tend to be focused only on themselves.  The hope is that this early introduction to volunteerism will remain with the girls as a lifelong commitment.


The Bond Legislation
The Democrats in the Assembly and Sentate have agreed to language to create a
Dedicated Rate Component to repay the budget and de-link the bonds from the
DWR contracts.
But the Republicans have still not agreed to go along.
The bill would require a 2/3's vote to keep the bond issuance on schedule, so
Republican votes are necessary.
The Republicans are trying to meet tonite or tomorrow to determine whether to
go along.

The Conference Committee
Senator Burton does not like the idea of a conference committee and at this
point prefers to use the existing committee structure to hear the
core/noncore proposal.
Using the existing committee structure could take longer to produce a bill
than using the conference committee structure, but how much longer is
uncertain.
No sense yet of when hearings on the core/noncore proposal---in conference
committee or otherwise--will take place, though Burton continues to say that
he wants to "give it a chance."

The Core/Noncore Legislative Language
The negotiating group continues to work on the language.
The language was supposed to be delivered to Hertzberg by COB today, but more
work needs to be done and it is now scheduled to be delivered first thing
tomorrow morning.

Senator Dunn's Investigative Committee Hearing
The hearing's been moved from tomorrow to Wednesday.

Best,
Jeff


Please reserve one flu vaccine for Mike McConnell.  You may notify by e-mail
or call X-31450 when it is available.

Thank you.

Cathy Phillips
X-36898


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	All Employee Meeting - Star Wars exhibit Hyatt Exhibit Hall

Date:		4/2/2001
Time:		2:00 PM - 8:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


All:

Attached you will find a list that reflects your seat assignments for Business Continuity Planning (BCP).  These seats are located on the 30th and 31st Floors of Enron Center North (ECN).  As previously communicated, you will report to these designated seats in the event of an outage in ECS.

The exception to this is as follows:
If your seat assignment is located on the 31st Floor, you will report to your original location that you occupied prior to your move into ECS.  This will hold true until the Monday after Thanksgiving, as we will have the 31st floor seats set up at that time.

Testing:
Once you have moved to ECS, if you would like to test your BCP location, you will be able to test your seat for functionality every Thursday from 3-6pm.  Testing is not required, but is highly recommended.

If anyone has any questions or concerns about these procedures, please feel free to contact me at any time.

Regards,

Stephen R. Harrington
Technical Project Manager, ECS Project
Enron Net Works, LLC
w:  713-853-7619
p:  877-651-7361
c:  713-444-7279
stephen.harrington@enron.com


Hey Everyone,

I want to invite all of you to a Holiday Party December 23rd at my parent's
house in Ross.  Attached below is the invite and a text copy of the invite.

A group of us always go on a hike during the day in the hills up around
Phoenix lake.  Feel free to join us for the hike.  If you can't make the
hike, feel free to come for the hot tub part of the party or for the
official beginning of the party at 5pm.

I hope to see you all on the 23rd.  Happy Holidays.  (please RSVP by next
Saturday!)

Sean

text version

Holiday Party

Saturday December 23th

10:30am  Juice, Muffins, and Coffee
11:15Am Set out for a Hike (Rain or Shine)
3 ish Hot Tub and Relax
5:00pm to 10ish: Dinner, Decorating, Singing, Drinking, Etc.

What to Bring

Hiking Attire, Hiking Snacks, a Water Bottle, Bathing Suit & Towel, Casual
Party Attire (To Change Into After Hiking)

Where:  Sean's Parents' House in Marin (10 Duff Lane, Ross)

From 101 North, take the San Anselmo/Sir Francis Drake Exit North (go under
the freeway), go 3-4 miles on Sir Francis Drake, Left on Lagunitas (at the
2nd (I think) light after Sir Francis Drake goes from 2 to 1 lane), through
two (maybe 3 now) stop signs, left on Duff Lane.  Third and Final house at
the top.

Please RSVP by no later than 12/16/00

Sean's Cell 305-5160 or skmaloney@yahoo.com
Sean's Parents (Carmella & Dick) 456-6846

 - HOL2k.doc


Please join us at an All-Employee Meeting at 10 a.m. (Houston time)
Wednesday, Feb. 21.  The meeting will be held in Houston's Hyatt Regency
Imperial Ballroom.  We will review Enron's year-end financial and operating
results and discuss our outlook for the future.

The meeting will be streamed live on IP-TV to employees in Houston, Omaha,
Portland (ENA), New York, Calgary, London, Stockholm, Frankfurt, Amsterdam,
Madrid, Toronto, Dublin, Ohio, and San Ramon and Costa Mesa in Calif.  In
addition, we will broadcast the meeting via video teleconference to employees
in Portland (EBS), Chicago, Tehachapi, Calif., Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro,
Buenos Aires and San Juan.  Detailed instructions for viewing the meeting on
the IP-TV web site will follow.

Employees based in Europe, Japan and Australia:  You will receive an
additional communication about the meeting with more details on how to access
the meeting and/or receive a videotape of the meeting if you are located in a
remote office with limited access to IP-TV.

All other employees:  If you don't have access to IP-TV or, if you do, are
unable to attend or view the meeting, you can order a video by contacting
Courtney Votaw by e-mail or phone (713-853-9390).

As always, we welcome your questions.  Submit them to Erin Rice by e-mail,
fax (713-853-6790) or interoffice mail (EB4703C).  The deadline for advance
questions is Thursday, Feb. 15.

Mark your calendar.  See you there.


Eric,  Please take a stab at drafting the interconnect agreement.  This is
Mary Jo's deal.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2000 07:03
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           03/29/2000 02:56 PM

To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Hilcorp Old Ocean Processing Plant

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2000
02:55 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           03/22/2000 06:43 PM

To: Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Campbell/LON/ECT@ECT, Brad
Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jack Simunek/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Hilcorp Old Ocean Processing Plant

Shawna,

Attached is a Contract Preparation Request for a Facilities Agreement for the
inlet meter to the Hilcorp Old Ocean Processing Plant.  Also attached is a
copy of the Work Order describing the scope of the project.  This meter will
be numbered 098-1603.

George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000
06:37 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Mary Jo Johnson                           03/08/2000 11:43 AM

To: Brad Blevins
cc: gweissm@ect.enron.com, Kevin Kuehler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gregory L
Sharp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Hilcorp Old Ocean Processing Plant

Brad,

In follow up to our meetin with Hilcorp yesterday, I am requesting that you
break out a segment from the original estimate for facilities.

We have determined that the immediate need will require is a cost estimate
for the inlet meter at the intersection of the two pipelines.  Hilcorp will
put in the tap on their line.  I would like to have a notional number of how
much that saves us also.

Since the estimate is already complete, I am hoping you can just break out
this information.  Greg Sharp is looking for an answer of go or no go on this
project as early as this Friday (the 10th).

Please let me know if this is possible so that I can run some economics....


Paul Bristow gave me a call a few minutes ago, and is sending over some
info.  I also received an email yesterday relating to operational risk.
Evidently CIBC has purchased some software to help quantify there exposure.

-Kevin

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Kindall/Corp/Enron on 08/08/2000
10:06 AM ---------------------------

"Tao, Xin" <tao@NetRisk.com> on 08/07/2000 12:26:00 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:

Subject: Press Release - NetRisk Announces Sale of RiskOpsTM Software to C
anadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Erste Bank

> Please find attached an update on our most recent RiskOps sales. In
> addition, we are currently implementing RiskOps at a continental European
> financial insitution and a Tokyo based Japanese financial institution,
> neither of whom are MORE members.  We hope to issue a press release on
> these clients in the near future.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Lara Swann
>
>
>
>  <<...>>
>
> NetRisk Announces Sale of RiskOpsTM Software
> to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Erste Bank
>
>
> GREENWICH, CT. July 11, 2000 - NetRisk, Inc., the risk management software
> and advisory firm, today announced that both Canadian Imperial Bank of
> Commerce (CIBC) and Erste Bank have purchased licenses to its RiskOps(tm)
> software product for measuring and managing enterprise-wide operational
> risk. Operational risk includes the risk of direct and indirect loss from
> causes as diverse as rogue trading to technology failures to improper
> sales practices.
>
> Erste Bank, the second largest Austrian bank, and Canadian Imperial Bank
> of Commerce, the second largest Canadian bank, plan to use RiskOps(tm) on
> a continuing basis to help evaluate and quantify their firm-wide
> operational risk capital. The results will be integrated into their
> Risk-Adjusted Return on Capital (RAROC) and consolidated enterprise
> (market, credit and operational) risk measures. These measures will help
> both banks to better allocate resources, evaluate individual business
> units on a risk-adjusted basis and improve strategic decision-making.
>
> "We are delighted to continue our working relationships with CIBC and
> Erste Bank by offering the RiskOps(tm) solution to complete their
> operational risk measurement and management processes," says Dan Mudge, a
> founding partner of NetRisk. "Operational Risk has been at the forefront
> of the regulators' minds and both CIBC and Erste Bank are taking leading
> positions in the industry by quantifying Capital at Risk by business
> line."
>
> "RiskOps(tm) has enabled us to comprehensively measure and manage
> operational risk for each of our businesses," says Tony Peccia, Head of
> Operational Risk Management at CIBC. "RiskOps(tm) gives us the tools we
> need not only for capital allocation purposes but also for strategic
> decision making."
>
> "The formal inclusion of operational risk into our overall risk management
> framework has required a significant commitment of Erste Bank.
> RiskOps(tm) will be used to estimate Capital at Risk for each business,
> thereby creating an incentive for stronger risk management within the
> Bank," says Franz Reif Head of Risk Management of Erste Bank.  "In
> addition, we plan to work with Swiss Re New Markets to evaluate our risk
> financing alternatives to ensure our capital is being used most
> efficiently."
>
> "NetRisk is pleased to continue its leadership role in helping the
> financial services industry develop methods and tools to quantify and
> manage operational risk," said Rob Ceske, head of NetRisk's Operational
> Risk Management division. "As another example, the data standards we are
> developing in conjunction with Multinational Operational Risk Exchange(tm)
> (MORE(tm)), which includes CIBC, will significantly benefit the industry's
> ability to exchange loss and risk data."
>
> RiskOps(tm) incorporates a database of published operational risk losses
> from the financial services industry, combined with web-based software to
> allow users to understand operational risk, analyze loss probabilities,
> scale these losses to their firm and determine operational risk profiles,
> including operational Capital-at-Risk. The product displays graphical
> analyses of the causes, effects, probabilities and severities of
> operational risk, specific descriptions of events and measures to help
> senior management and risk managers understand and quantify the sources of
> operational risk. RiskOps(tm) is available via the Internet, by means of
> any standard browser.
>
> ABOUT NETRISK
> NetRisk's mission is to bring cost-effective, practical, leading edge risk
> solutions to its clients.  To do so it is creating on-line communities and
> risk analytic software delivered via the Internet.  Products and services
> offered by NetRisk include: RiskOps - internet-based operational risk
> management solution; Crystal Box - interactive performance and risk
> reporting for the investment professional; and Risk Advisory - enterprise
> risk management consulting, advice and solutions to the financial services
> industry. Gene Shanks, the former President of Bankers Trust, founded
> NetRisk, Inc. in 1997.    NetRisk has offices in Greenwich, CT; New York
> City; and London.  Additional information on NetRisk is available at
> http://www.netrisk.com/ and on MORE at MORExchange.org.
>
> ABOUT CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE
> Canadian Imperial Bank of Canada is Canada's number two bank. Its 1350
> branches a range of banking services, including checking and savings
> accounts, investment products, mortgages and other loans, and credit cards
> to consumers and small to mid-sized businesses. In addition, the bank
> underwrites and sells life, credit, personal property/ casualty, and
> non-medical health insurance. CIBC World Markets provides investment
> banking and other financial services in North America, Europe and Latin
> America.
> ABOUT ERSTE BANK
> Erste Bank is Austria's oldest and second-largest commercial bank. The
> bank is doing business in six core segments: retail banking, corporate
> banking, treasury, trading and sales, and real estate financing and asset
> management. It has approximately 300 branches with international offices
> in New York, Hong Kong, and London. As Austrian banks consolidate, Erste
> Bank is increasing its presence in Eastern Europe. It has subsidiaries in
> Croatia and Hungary and acquired 52% of the shares in Ceska Sporitelna,
> the second largest bank in the Czech Republic from the Czech government.
> One of Erste Bank's largest shareholders is Savings foundation
> Anteilsverwaltung Sparkasse .
>
>
>
>
>


The California daily conference call will continue to take place through the
last week in February.  The time,  number, passcode and location listed below
will remain the same.

Thanks and feel free to call if you have any questions.

gngr
713-853-7751

----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 01/26/2001 10:42 AM -----

A  conference call, regarding the above subject, has been scheduled daily to
provide a single place and time to review what has occurred over the last 24
hours regarding the California crisis and what lies ahead.  The conf. call
information will be as follows:

Date:  Daily (beginning 1/12/01 - 1/26/01) there will not be a call on
Monday, January 15

Time:  10:30am (CST)

Number: 1-800-998-2462
  passcode 4912753

Location: EB4701 (for those in Houston)

Please feel free to forward this information to others you feel should
participate.


Here's a cut at the taxonomy of regulatory risks associated with Direct Access. Please let me know if there are others I missed, or if there are changes needed to the ones listed.

1.	Retroactive Suspension of DA Contracts:  The PUC rules in a subsequent decision that DA is suspended on some date 	between July 1 and September 20th.

2.	Contract renewal forbidden:  The PUC includes contract renewal under the suspension of DA.

3.	No incremental "DASR'ing":  The PUC includes incremental additions and subtractions of DA customer's load under the 	suspension of DA (e.g., fast food chains, University campus)

4.	Cost allocation: the PUC adds new costs to DA accounts and/or disproportionately shifts existing costs to DA accounts.  	Costs with greatest risk of being shifted to DA customers include: IOU undercollection, bonds to repay the state general fund, 	and DWR contracts.  The costs associated with these categories are substantial.

Key risks associated with each category:
Adverse to P/L
Adverse to hedge (demand risk)


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Mark R. Tawney
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Tawney
Report Total: $918.09
Amount Due Employee: $918.09

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Please remove from email.

Phillip Allen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	editor@cookingsweeps.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-editor+40cookingsweeps+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Saturday, May 26, 2001 3:45 PM
To:	pallen@enron.com
Subject:	1/2 Price Omaha Steaks Sale!

This message was not sent unsolicited. Your email has been submitted and verified for opt in promotions. It is our goal to bring you the best in online promotions.

            [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    Skip  the ties and cologne this year.  Enjoy EXCLUSIVE  SAVINGS from Omaha Steaks!  Plus get 6 Burgers  FREE!       Get  these great Omaha Steaks at 1/2 Price!                   [IMAGE] << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIHC >>      [IMAGE] << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIHD >>      [IMAGE] << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIHE >>      4  (7 oz.) Filet Mignons << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIHF >>      Filet  & Strip Combo << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIHG >>       4  (5 oz.) Bacon Wrapped Filets << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIHH >>            2 (6 oz.) Filet  Mignons  2 (10 oz.)  Boneless Strips     [IMAGE]  Reg.  Price $64.00   Your  Exclusive Price  $32.00    Save  $32.00!      [IMAGE]  Reg.  Price $69.00    Your  Exclusive Price  $34.50    Save  $34.50!      [IMAGE]  Reg.  Price $46.99    Your  Exclusive Price  $23.50    Save  $23.49!      [IMAGE] << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIHI >>     [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIHJ >>     [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIIA >>            You can't go wrong with  a gift from   Omaha Steaks << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIIB >> !  There are no wrong  sizes or wrong colors.  We're so  confident your Dad will be delighted with  his gift, we're offering you our 100%  satisfaction guarantee.  If your  Dad isn't absolutely thrilled - for any  reason - we'll replace his order or refund  your money, whichever you prefer.   Order today at www.omahasteaks.com. << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIIC >>     Your Dad is sure to be pleased when  he sees the Omaha Steaks cooler waiting  for him at the door.  Now comes  the smile when he opens the package  and sees the personalized note from  you saying "Happy Father's Day!".   So this year, skip the ties and cologne  and impress Dad with Omaha  Steaks << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIID >>  - a Father's Day gift he  can really sink his teeth into!       Sincerely,  [IMAGE] Fred  Simon Owner, OmahaSteaks.com 1-800-960-8400     P.S. Don't forget  to remember grandfathers, uncles, fathers-in-law,  brothers and dear friends this Father's  Day with an impressive gift of Omaha  Steaks << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIIE >> !     [IMAGE]

Note: This is not a spam email.  This email was sent to you because you have been verified and  agreed to opt in to receive promotional material. If you wish to unsubscribe please CLICK HERE. << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIIF >>   If you received this email by error, please reply to: unsubscribe@cookingsweeps.com << File: http://216.242.237.6:8765/nmail/click?id=DEEFPBCJFCJBPBBIIG >>


I cannot get anyone to answer the the fax number that attached to your
messages.  Please attach the correct number, answer the present one, or let
me respond to the affadavit by e-mail.

Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin
713-345-8274 work
713-305-1502 home


Here I am again ---

The products that the customer desires is:  all types (financial/physical)
for gas and power.  What do you think?

Thanks,
Griff

---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Griff Gray/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2001
01:05 PM ---------------------------

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     03/09/2001 01:00 PM

To: Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT
cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT
Subject: The New Power Company (adm08126) --- ability to transact

Guys,

I received a call from Mike Garred, admin for The New Power Company, wanting
to confirm that his company is properly set up in EOL ---- everything is fine
from our end.  What does this customer need to do to get credit?

Thanks,
Griff


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000 12:02
PM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/27/2000 11:49:58 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Porter, Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Dalphon,
Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: April '00 FOM numbers for CES

Chris--Attached is the spreadsheet that we spoke of earlier today.  I have
made
the correction to TCO Op 2, Mkt Area 20 into NYSEG (i.e. +854 dth/day).   I
will make the necessary changes to the AGL volumes over the next few minutes.
As we discussed, we'll need to resolve the question about Central Hudson off
Iroquois (we may not need any volumes there since Duke is the supplier), and
as
I said, we'll be discussing our needs into southern Connecticut on a firm
basis
with other suppliers.   I am also attaching the spreadsheet with the storage
injections for assigned storage.   I believe that we need to negotiate the
price for all of the  April storage injections.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - Apr00 Master.xls
 - COH & AGL.xls


Dear Jeff:

I am writing to ask Enron to become a sponsor of the annual POWER research
conference on electricity restructuring, which will take place this year
on March 16, 2001 in Berkeley.  This will be POWER's sixth annual
electricity research conference.  Last year's conference was quite
successful, with attendance of nearly 150 and a number of papers that were
discussed widely and were influential in electricity policy. Information
on past programs and the plans for this year at our website:
http://www.ucei.org/power_conf.html . We already have received submissions
from top researchers for this year's conference.  We anticipate another
very strong program of active electricity restructuring researchers and
practitioners.

As in the past, we plan to include about 8 papers on the program.  The
presentations will be organized by topic and the papers will be discussed
by both researchers and practitioner.  Past programs have been very
successful in stimulating discussion that included both researchers and
practitioners.

The cost to Enron to become a sponsor would be $10,000. As a sponsor,
Enron would be listed on the front of the conference program and in the
pre-conference mailing.  In addition, Enron could send up to 5 people to
the conference at no additional cost.

The annual POWER conferences on electricity restructuring have been very
well received by industry, policy, and academic participants.  With the
broad and growing interest in deregulation of electricity markets, we have
every reason to anticipate that this year's conference will be just as
successful. We hope that Enron will decide to become a sponsor of the
conference.

I can be contacted by phone at 510-642-5145, by fax at 510-643-5180, or by
e-mail at borenste@haas.berkeley.edu.  I look forward to talking with you
soon about this.

Sincerely,

Severin
_________________________________________________________________
Severin Borenstein
Co-Director, Program on Workable Energy Regulation

E.T. Grether Professor of Business
Administration and Public Policy   Director
Haas School of Business              U.C. Energy Institute
University of California             2539 Channing Way
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900              Berkeley, CA 94720-5180
(p) 510-642-3689                     (p) 510-642-5145
(f) 707-885-2508                     http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei

Email: borenste@haas.berkeley.edu
WWW: http://haas.berkeley.edu/~borenste


please put these letters on my stationary and lets send
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2000
12:51 PM ---------------------------
From: Eric Gillaspie on 03/23/2000 11:17 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Four-Four Construction/Greatwood Lateral

Richard,

As requested, I have prepared a draft letter to be sent to Four-Four, Inc.
demanding payment of the subcontractors immediately.  Also attached for your
review is the letter directing the subcontractors' attorney to direct all
future communications in the matter to you.  When I updated Barbara Gray on
the matter she suggested that you handle the communications with the
subcontractors' attorney.  According to the subcontractors' attorney a
response is demanded by Friday March 24th.  If I can be of any further
assistance please let me know.  I will forward the file on this matter
immediately.

Thanks,
Eric A. Gillaspie
x5-7667


I sent it to the crude oil option trader.  Is that good enough?

	Mark Taylor
	10/25/2000 11:42 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: (00-362) Revised Crude Oil Options Expiration Date

This one should go to the crude traders.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 11:41 AM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	10/25/2000 11:50 AM

		 To: mark.taylor@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (00-362) Revised Crude Oil Options Expiration Date

Notice No. 00-362
October 25, 2000

To:
All NYMEX Division Members
All NYMEX Division Member Firms
All NYMEX Division Clearing Members
All NYMEX Division Operations Managers

From: George Henderson, Vice President

Re: Revised Crude Oil Options Expiration Date

It has come to the attention of the Exchange that some earlier publications
may contain an incorrect option expiration date. Please be advised that the
expiration date for the Crude Oil Options December 2000 contract month (LO
Z00) has been revised to Tuesday, November 14, 2000.

Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Floor
Departments Systems Area at (212) 299-2626.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=mark.taylor@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-362)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Thanks a million.  Please keep me posted.  See you next week!

Best,
Jeff


Dear  Greg Whalley,

Welcome to Energy News Live - http://www.energynewslive.com !

You are receiving this email as a result of your recent registration.

FREE ENERGY NEWS LIVE MEMBERSHIP
We're glad you've joined us; we think you'll find ENL an amazing business
tool,
with live, up-to the-minute news every hour on the hour of every business day.
Insight from actual traders. Exotic and proprietary
weather modeling. A new cross-commodity index. We'll break every
energy headline around the world, and bring them right to your desktop.
So sign on, leave it on, stay on top. And enjoy your membership to
EnergyNewsLive.com, the first real-time energy network.

If you did not request this account please click here to de-activate
http://www.energynewslive.com/reg/delete_user.cfm?UID=6006

Sincerely,

The Energy News Live Team


[IMAGE]
					[IMAGE]

				[IMAGE]
							 The eDiets Professional Staff is with YOU every step of the way! Don't  wait to lose weight. Start now and you can lose 10 pounds in 5 weeks! YOU can do it. And eDiets can help!
						[IMAGE]

Click here if you no longer want to receive gifts and special offers from Send 4 Fun.


Thanks Dutch.  I spoke with John Arnold yesterday and he said that we can assume that the deal verbally confirmed on Friday does not need to be done.  That is CSFB's position and unless you disagree we will leave it at that.

Chris Calger
503-464-3735

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Dutch
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:43 AM
To:	St. Clair, Carol; Calger, Christopher F.; Sacks, Edward
Subject:	RE: Terminating Trades

	To All,

	I am the one that was on the phone with the original call on the deal last Friday night and
	in contact with them up until this past Sunday. Let me know what I can do to help on this
	deal.

	Dutch Quigley

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:30 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	FW: Terminating Trades

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	St. Clair, Carol
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:24 PM
To:	Calger, Christopher F.
Cc:	Sacks, Edward; Arnold, John
Subject:	RE: Terminating Trades

Chris:
Today we received a letter from them.  How and when do you want to respond to this?  Has anyone called them?

Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Calger, Christopher F.
Sent:	Monday, December  3, 2001 5:43 PM
To:	St. Clair, Carol
Cc:	Sacks, Edward; Arnold, John
Subject:	RE: Terminating Trades

Ed Sacks has the list.  With respect to CSFB, it sounds like we have a dispute.  Trades, my understanding, can get "done" verbally and then confirmed.  It sounds like we should pull the tapes.  We should also think of whether the deal agreed to Friday is currently in or out of the money.

Ed, could you look into this?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	St. Clair, Carol
Sent:	Monday, December 03, 2001 2:55 PM
To:	Calger, Christopher F.
Cc:	Rohauer, Tanya
Subject:	Terminating Trades

Chris:
We need to come up with a list of trades that we terminated last Friday so that we can take them out of our books.    Do you have that list?  Also, I spoke with "Dutch" this morning because CSFB left me a message yesterday after we filed claiming that the Friday trade was not effective.  I disagree even though a confirm has not been signed.  How do you want to handle this?

Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Shirley,

Please, let Rice invitees know.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
04/10/2001 08:27 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: ALP presentation

This will be in EB49C1

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001
08:22 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
04/10/2001 08:13 AM
To: barrett@rice.edu, uecker@rice.edu, cmiller@rice.edu, lounghrid@rice.edu,
luigical@rice.edu
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: ALP presentation

On behalf of  Enron Corp. I would like to invite you to an ALP Project
presentation by a group of students
of Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management, Rice University.

The students will present the results of a research project regarding
electronic trading
platforms in the energy industry.

The presentation will be held on May 7, at 4:00 p.m. at Enron, 1400 Smith.

We would also like to invite you to dinner, following the presentation.

Vince Kaminski

Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director - Research
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Room EB1962
Houston, TX 77002-7361

Phone: (713) 853 3848
 (713) 410 5396 (cell)
Fax  :      (713) 646 2503
E-mail: vkamins@enron.com


Tomorrow's 10:00 - 11:00 a.m. P&L meeting with Philippe and Greg is canceled.

Thank you,

Tina Spiller
Assistant to Greg Piper
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Net Works LLC
Office 713.853.5746
tina.spiller@enron.com


If you cannot read today's e-Journal, please visit this link:  <http://www.michbar.org/e-journal/111901.html> Or to receive a plain text version, please send an e-mail to lyris@lists.michbar.org  In the body, type:  unsubscribe ejournal and on the next line type:  subscribe ejournal-text


Thanks for your message.  I returned home on Monday, but Kim and Alina are in the air right now and will arrive home tonight.

Please let me know about your availability for an appoint

Thurs. Jan 10 (PM)
Fri Jan 11
Mon Jan 14 (PM)
Tues, Jan 15 or Wed, Jan 16.

Thanks

Shelley Corman
713-853-7083
shelley.corman@enron.com


Please the attached list.  The Management Committee names have been highlighted in bold.


Thanks for the heads up.  Let me know when you need help...

	Sara Shackleton
	11/28/2000 04:34 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: metals trading

FYI
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 04:33 PM -----

	Diana Higgins
	11/28/2000 08:06 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Hamish M Scutt/EU/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: metals trading

Hi Sara,

The Enron entity is
Enron Metals Limited

(which formerly was Metallgesellschaft Limited)

I can evaluate the credit, and also Anna Shaw, Hamish Scutt or Lindsay
Edmonds, so if you send a request would appreciate if you copy all of us.

Thanks a lot

Diana

From: Sara Shackleton on 27/11/2000 18:31 CST
To: Diana Higgins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: metals trading

Diana:

I negotiated the Enron North America Corp.  ISDA Master Agreement with the
"President and Fellows of Harvard University" (together with John Suttle).
Harvard is interested in metals trading.  What is the entity trading metals
(financial)?  Will you evaluate the credit?

Please let me know.  Thanks.  Sara


FYI -
I will send you an update about SCE and other CA bills impacting renewables shortly.
*****
Calif Renewable Pwr Plant Owners Fight Edison Bankruptcy
Updated: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 02:00 PM ET
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--A bankruptcy proceeding for Edison International's (EIX </investments/quotes/?symbol=EIX>, news </investments/news/?symbol=EIX>, msgs </investments/discuss/?symbol=EIX>) regulated utility subsidiary, Southern California Edison, would have severe negative consequences for the renewable energy community and for all Californians, an association of small, independent power producers in the state said.
The Renewable Energy Creditors Committee said it was responding to media reports that other creditors are on the verge of forcing Edison into bankruptcy.
"Such a filing would raise the cost of doing business in California for years to come," the group said in a press release. "Those who finance bonds to carry out capital improvements will place risk premiums on California projects, if it is demonstrated through the bankruptcy of both of the state's largest utilities that default on debt is an acceptable option."
Members of the Renewable Energy Creditors Committee have already seen their costs of financing projects rise due to the continued uncertainty over more than $400 million in back payments that Edison owes committee members, the group said. For months, some committee members have been unable to pay some creditors and have faced increasing costs of debt.
The committee called on state leaders to work out a financial alternative in the special session expected to be called by Gov. Gray Davis.
In March, several members of the Renewable Energy Creditors Committee came close to initiating an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding against Edison, but a key court decision and the movement of some funds to the generators staved off the move.
"The committee will not take action for now to force Edison into bankruptcy as long as a legislative solution to take care of back payments and encourage the use of renewable energy remains possible," the press release said.
The Renewable Energy Creditors Committee is comprised of wind, solar, geothermal, biomass and landfill gas generators across California. Its members produce 3,000 megawatts of energy, enough to supply electricity to approximately 3 million homes. The committee members represent the vast majority of Edison's renewable energy supply, but they also provide electricity to PG&E.
-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com <mailto:mark.golden@dowjones.com>


The report named: West Power Position <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=29&report_name=West+Power+Position&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=12/28/2001>, published as of 12/28/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
01:58 PM ---------------------------

Diane H Cook
12/12/2000 03:10 PM
To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: final again

I promise this is the final file:


Andrew Edison, Gail Brownfeld, Richard Sanders

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Khoja, Sayed
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:37 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Sanders, Richard B.
Cc:	Myers, Thomas
Subject:	FW: EGM Legal Allocation

Mark / Richard,

Can we please get a list of the attorneys in your groups that work on EGM cases by the end of today?  We are attempting to respond to a request from the EGM Office of the Chair.

Thanks.

Sayed
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leschber, Edie
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:51 PM
To:	Khoja, Sayed
Subject:	FW: EGM Legal Allocation

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Korkmas, Deb
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:47 PM
To:	Leschber, Edie
Subject:	RE: EGM Legal Allocation

Edie, the attorneys in the Global Markets area are as follows:

Alan Aronowitz
Dan Rogers
Ned Crady
John Boomer
Robert Bruce
Dominic Carolan
Wayne Gresham
Matthias Lee (Singapore)
Jane McBride (Japan)
David Minns (Australia)
Limor Nissan (NY)
Coralina Rivera
Mike Robison
John Viverito

I have not heard back from Mark Taylor or Richard Sanders as of yet.  Sorry.  Maybe just guess for them.  Deb

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leschber, Edie
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:15 AM
To:	Korkmas, Deb
Subject:	EGM Legal Allocation

Deb,
EGM is requesting a list of the attorneys that work on EGM cases.  Based on our allocation schedule (I have attached it again for your reference), the following cost center owners are allocating costs to EGM: Sanders, Taylor, Aronowitz, Cash.

Could you please give me a list of attorneys within these groups that work on EGM?  I realize that Aronowitz's group is 100% EGM, so a list of attorney's in that group would work.  I also realize that Michelle Cash is probably the one within her own group who would do any work for them.  In addition though, for Sanders and Taylor, can you find out from them who in their group would work on EGM?  Is it them or attorneys within their groups?

I need to have this information today if possible.

Thanks,
Edie

 << File: Allocation Worksheets.xls >>


Please see enclosed paper from Joe Hillings.  It will be distributed at the
US WTO Energy Services Coalition Meeting tomorrow, 11/16/99.

Encl.

 - Services~Barriers~example~11-99.doc

cc: USG


Not today.  Let's get feedback from GE today.  Plus, the document has a lot
of formatting glitches and it looks terrible.

Does that work?

Kay

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 11/13/2000 02:54 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: FW: Compared Document

Kay - are we at the point that Lisa Alfaro should look at this and at least
be able to tell Brett and the Elektrobolt team the terms?

R.


Presuminh we can afford headcount?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise <Louise.Kitchen@ENRON.com>
To: Lavorato, John <John.Lavorato@ENRON.com>; Oxley, David <David.Oxley@ENRON.com>
Sent: Mon Jan 21 16:58:59 2002
Subject: Re:

I saw an offer letter to teresa staab so if we didn't give it to her its on the reserve list somewhere.

David - did it go out?  If so whitt is done
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Eileen, our Gas Control records indicate the following rate changes for March
26, 2001 flow:
20,000 rate 0900 to 1400 (5hrs);
40,000 rate 1400 to 0100 (11hrs)
Nom. for the day:  22,500 MMBTU.
Please call me to see if we can agree on the total nom.
I can be reached at 214-812-4404.

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/27/2001 09:39:00 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM,
LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject:  NOMS/ACTUAL VOLS FOR 3/26/01

NOM       MCF       MMBTU
24,167         21,820         22,409

BTU = 1.027

NOTE:  No changes to flow rates for 3/23 thru 3/25.............


If you work in West Power Trading, congratulations!  All West Power Trading
employees are eligible to receive a pair of tickets to a Blazers game this
season, compliments of Enron.  If you are interested in getting a pair of
tickets to a Blazer game, come by Mt. Hood Conference Room at 11:30 a.m.,
Monday, November 6.

We will draw employee names from a hat (or container) to determine the order
of selection.  Once the order of selection has been determined, there will be
a signup sheet with available games listed, and you can sign up for the date
that works best for you by signing your name next to the available date.   If
your name is drawn, you will have one minute to write your date selection on
the signup sheet.  Listed below are the dates available for selection, so
plan ahead and be ready to select from remaining dates once the selection
process begins.  Greg Wolfe or Chris Foster will be there to oversee the
signup process since I will be in Houston for training Monday through
Wednesday next week.

Guidelines for using the tickets are as follows.
  - Eligible employees can receive a pair of tickets.
  - The employee who is given the tickets must attend the game.
  - Tickets cannot be sold or given away.
  - The guest can be a friend, spouse, or another Enron employee.
  - If the employee cannot attend the game, the tickets must be returned to
me or Debra.
  - Any complaints about this process or the guidelines will result in
forfeiture of tickets.

If you are going to be out of the office on Monday, November 6, please let me
or Debra know.  Arrangements will be made for you to get a pair of tickets.
Call me or Debra if you have any questions.

Blazer Game Date Options (All games at 7 p.m. unless otherwise specified.)

Tuesday, November 7, Atlanta
Thursday, November 9, Denver
Saturday, November 11, Houston
Saturday, November 25, New Jersey
Tuesday, November 28, Seattle
Thursday, November 39, Dallas
Wednesday, December 6, Toronto
Friday, December 8, Philadelphia
Saturday, December 9, Detroit
Friday, December 15, Orlando
Saturday, December 23, Washington
Friday, December 29, Vancouver
Monday, January 1, Charlotte
Friday, January 5, Milwaukee
Tuesday, January 16, Cleveland
Saturday, January 20, Sacramento
Tuesday, January 30, Chicago  (2:30 p.m.)
Thursday, February 1, Phoenix
Wednesday, February 7, Seattle
Tuesday, February 13, Minnesota
Saturday, February 17, Boston
Tuesday, February 20, Denver
Thursday, March 1, Los Angeles Clippers
Saturday, March 3, Oakland
Tuesday, March 6, Vancouver
Thursday, March 8, San Antonio   (5:00 p.m.)
Wednesday, March 14, Phoenix
Monday, March 26, LA Clippers
Wednesday, March 28, Dallas
Friday, March 30, New York
Sunday, April 1, Minnesota   (Noon)
Tuesday, April 10, Oakland
Friday, April 13, Houston
Tuesday, April 17, San Antonio


We want to send this out from Christi.  Agree?

Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 06/07/2001
07:37 AM ---------------------------

Christi L Nicolay@ECT
06/07/2001 07:30 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Memo to send out

Why don't I send it out to all of the group for East and West.  I don't think
we need to discuss East or West group leads since that may be switching
around once we hire a new person for the NE.  In addition, I think this
appropriately emphasizes that everyone needs to be coordinating with all
others, rather than placing that on a group lead.  If you agree, I'll send it
out today.

James D Steffes@ENRON
06/06/2001 06:14 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Memo to send out

Here are my thoughts.  Should this come from you or me?  Do we want to
highlight Steve Walton and Ron M?  Should this be East only?  Pls respond.

To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Memo to send out

I would like to send this out to East RTO group.  OK with you?


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 03:47 PM -----

	Lou Stoler
	01/30/2001 11:18 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Schedule

----- Forwarded by Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 11:17 AM -----

	"Robert Stephens" <rstephens@bracepatt.com>
	01/29/2001 06:13 PM

		 To: "W. Cleland Dade" <cdade@bracepatt.com>, "Heather Brown"
<hbrown@bracepatt.com>, "Richard Rice" <rrice@bracepatt.com>,
<christopher.a.helfrich@enron.com>, <lou.stoler@enron.com>,
<rodney.malcolm@enron.com>, <craig.hiddleston@houston.rr.com>,
<cdoveala@metalsusa.com>, <jhageman@metalsusa.com>,
<nhsorensen@porterhedges.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Schedule

Attached is a draft of the Schedule to the ISDA.  As representatives of
Enron, including the Enron lawyers ultimately responsible for the preparation
of the Schedule, have not yet had the chance to review the foregoing it
remains subject to their further comments.

 - #1249108 v2 - ISDA SCHEDULE - METALS.doc


Yeah, your position has definitely been the bright spot of the day!
RR

Ryan Watt
06/08/2000 07:15 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: How's it looking?

Well I hope our miniscule difference and it being (relatively) early
brightened things up Ms Rodrigue!

Robin Rodrigue
06/08/2000 06:12 PM
To: Ryan Watt/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: How's it looking?

That was just plain  MEAN.  I'm having a bad enough day...I don't need your
crap too!

Have a good evening.  Talk to ya tomorrow.

RR

Ryan Watt
06/08/2000 07:03 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: How's it looking?

We're off!!!

by 0.70 contracts....talk to you tomorrow!

Robin Rodrigue
06/08/2000 06:00 PM
To: Ryan Watt/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Nicole LaPorte/CAL/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: How's it looking?

Sorry it took so long.

Robin

Ryan Watt
06/08/2000 06:49 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: How's it looking?


I will not be available for the call on Friday.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
08/05/99 01:22 PM ---------------------------

Janet H Moore
08/05/99 10:39 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Project Tornado Conference Call

---------------------- Forwarded by Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT on 08/05/99 10:39
AM ---------------------------

Kim Zachary
08/05/99 10:08 AM
To: Rbaird@velaw.com, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Krautz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, mbutch@skadden.com
cc: Lawrence Lawyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marty Malinow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
etell@exchange.ml.com, ewatson@skadden.com
Subject: Project Tornado Conference Call

There will be a conference call on Project Tornado on Friday, August 6th from
9:00am to 12:00 Noon (Central time).  The call-in number is: 800-649-2862,
confirmation #: 1525263 and the host is Larry Lawyer.  If you can not
participate please let me know as soon as possible.  Thanks.

Kim Zachary
713-853-1971


request_number:  DS-JCG:002
firstname:  Peter
lastname:  Richardson
e-mail:  peter@richardsonandoleary.com
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JCG-002
page_numbers:  22, lines 11-14
request_text:  Please provide references from BPA's May Proposal, Amended
Proposal and Supplemental Proposal to support the statement, "BPA has
described two pools of augmentation power to serve its loads(."

response_text:  Please see WP-02-E-BPA-09 at 7, lines 6 -16; WP-02-E-BPA-38
at 12, line 20, through 13, line 12; WP-02-FS-BPA-05 at 69, lines 10 - 13.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  dsl226.usw-1-224.pacifier.com
3.  Remote IP Address:  207.202.224.226
4.  Form URL:
https://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.76 [en] (Win95; U)


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 04:25
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mason Hamlin                           11/29/2000 04:18 PM

To: Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Piotrowski/NA/Enron@Enron, John
House/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Zachary McCarroll/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Priceless!

 - Priceless.jpg


I hope you know I was joking with you...I was a little hesitant about sending
that message...


Sounds good. I was thinking the same about a template in excel for a interim fix. Maybe one of the assistants knows who we would order the old tickets from. We could design new tickets with the duplicate feature they had. If an internal company (ie: The Image Center) produced them, we may have to go to a outside printer. Anyway, this is by no means urgent, but I believe it will eventually be a necessary cost of business.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 5:27 PM
To:	Palmer, B. Scott
Subject:	deal tickets

Good question,

I think we should have an excel template set up with all imaginable necessary info that all traders should use, one line per trade rather than one sheet per trade.  What do you think?

KK


Hello,

It looks like very few people would show up for class this coming
Wednesday because of Thanksgiving plans. I have therefore decided to
cancel class and to put off the in-class project I had planned until the
Dec. 5th class (more details on that next week).

Have a great holiday.

Howard Shelanski


The market last week for the flat MC was about $31: that difference would be 9.50 = $2,654,02 nominal for the increased mws.  The loss of the delivery value is about $.75/MWh- (about $2.3 million nominal).  The loss of the option is probably about $1 million.   Overall, you did a very job I think its worth $1.5 million- if you go by the numbers its 0.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rosman, Stewart
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:43 AM
To:	Swerzbin, Mike
Subject:	Valuation Overview

MWHRs =  4 Years and 1 quarter Flat so that equals approximately 37,250 Hours

The difference between 102 (the new amount) and 94.5 (the old average flat amount) = 7.5 MW * 37,250 HRs = 279,375 MWhrs

I was under the impression that a 100 MW flat amount would equal $3 million value (a $16 difference between market and $21.50).  This would indicate the 102 equals a $4,100,000 valuation.  As to the discount in value due to the flexibility and delivery point I am looking to you for leadership.  If my assumptions are wrong then let me know.

Stewart


-----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:20 PM
To:	Weldon, V. Charles; bajco@bajco.com; staytonweldon@dewittec.net; deannaharris@houston.rr.com; angelamcdonald@austin.rr.com; kkampe@ev1.net; jeffrey.j.schroeder@arthurandersen.com; ty.chambers@brinker.com; tdroupy@e2communications.com; rcrider@coral-energy.com
Subject:	Don't watch while eating lunch

---------------------- Forwarded by Stacey W White/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2001 04:18 PM ---------------------------

Donald Wayne Vinson
05/23/2001 04:18 PM
To:	Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Don't watch while eating lunch

---------------------- Forwarded by Donald Wayne Vinson/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2001 04:18 PM ---------------------------
From:	Judith Schlesinger/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 01:17 PM
To:	Donald Wayne Vinson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Don't watch while eating lunch

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001
05:14 PM ---------------------------

Amitava Dhar@ENRON
04/05/2001 02:33 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Outage risk option presentation

Hi Vince,

Please take a look to see if any changes are needed.  Once you are o.k. with
it, we can send it to Greg Whalley.
-Amitava


Q,

What days are you available for Sundeck to come out?

Kim


Eric the contact names are listed at the bottom of this message.

Please call if you have questions.


Carson:  I have been pretty awful, haven't I?  I took a short vacation to
Dallas last Friday but I'm back now.  I'd love to have lunch one day.  Just
give me a call (713/853-5620) and we can catch up.  Not much news; same old,
same old.  Sara

	"R. Carson Llewellyn" <carlew@flash.net>
	06/30/2000 01:36 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lost friend

Sara:

How have you been? I miss talking to you. I hope you have a great 4th. I
have had a couple of fun trips to New Orleans since we last had lunch.
It would be nice to see you and have lunch together some time.
Carson


Rudi,

Below is ETS Risk Management Policy, which we would like Corporate to review
before it is presented to management for approval and limit establishment.  I
have also attached a 1st draft of the Risk Management Procedures and Controls
that while not all are fully in place we expect them to be operational once
transactional active increases.

Rudi, who would be the person to check with on this policy.


Enron Management Committee

I hereby resign from the above mentioned committee.


Sounds like you are running and gunning.  I know how those times feel.  Seems
like it is never going to end.   You have been through it enough times to
know that it always does.  I don't think there is any feeling like turning in
that last paper or walking out of that last final at the end of a semester.
Feels like a huge weight is lifted off your shoulders.  After that comes
lifting the huge mug filled with beer.

Hang in there.
Gerald

Katie McMahon <katie99@tamu.edu> on 04/16/2000 07:53:35 PM
To: Gerald Nemec <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fwd: FW: Pretty Good Stuff here]

Hey Gerald,
 Sorry I've taken a while to write back.  I've been really busy with my
research paper.  It's due on Tues. along with another paper.  I also
have a presentation on Thurs. and one on next Tues.  After that it's
take home final time and then I am done.  I can see the light at the end
of the road!  It feels like a long way until I get there though.
 So, you are learning guitar?  THat's pretty cool.  I used to play the
trumpet.  I miss it every once in a while.
 Well, I hope you have a good week.
Talk to you later,
Katie

Gerald Nemec wrote:
>
> Hi Katie,
>      That email was pretty true.  School can be extremely stressful in short
> periods (around finals) but overall compared to work it was really a pretty
easy
> lifestyle.  How are thing's going for you with school?  Sounded like this
month
> was going to be a busy one.  The good thing about school is that there is a
> definite ending point with a break between.
>      It has calmed down some around here.  Focusing on things that I had
dropped
> during the end of quarter stretch.  I bought a new guitar yesterday.  My
friend
> Eric and I had our eye on this black Fernandes model for some time and
yesterday
> we decided to go for it.  I am still in the learning stages of playing but
it
> won't be too long before fame and stardom are at my disposal.  Well maybe a
> little longer than that.  Playing is really fun and a good stress reliever
> though.
>
> Hope everthing is going well for you.
>
> Take care,
> Gerald