The purchase from Swift was shown at mtr 3405 during Dec and Jan.  I have
created a new deal (#204777) to add mtr 9643 to the deal.

Deal 114096 is the purchase from HPLR Liquids.  This purchase is on 138544
for Jan 2000 forward.

D

	From:  Stella L Morris                           02/24/2000 02:39 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 1/2000 Meter 9643 Three Rivers Issues

Fred is trying to set up accounting arrangments to cover the Swift deal.  Can
you please verify that you made this purchase from Swift?  If so, is there
another deal to replace deal #114096 of should this deal be extended into
January.    If I should forward this to someone else, please let me know.

Thanks for you help, Stella

---------------------- Forwarded by Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
02:33 PM ---------------------------

Fred Boas
02/24/2000 11:25 AM
To: Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 1/2000 Meter 9643 Three Rivers Issues

Stella:

The Swift deal is not pathed correctly in POPS.  I set up an accounting
arrangement on the 012-41500-02-015 contract with the Track ID 80705.  Would
you put the contract in POPS with the associated Track ID?

The transportation contract (012-41500-02-003) for the Liquids Replacement
gas is not POPS.  I looked in Path Manager and there is no deal for it
either.  In December, the deal for this gas was 114096.  Could you extend the
deal or get me the number for the new deal if there is one?  I need to set up
an accounting arrangement so I will need for you to verify the deal number
and transportation contract that this gas is supposed to go on.  When I set
up the accounting arrangement I will let you know what the Track ID is so you
can put the contract at meter 9643.

Let me know when all of this is done so that I can reallocate the meter.

Thanks,

Fred


we will cancel these weekly meetings until we get some marketing contracts signed.  Any updates will be taken care of via weekly reports or in Steve Harris' weekly staff meeting.

By now you've probably heard that Kinder-Morgan shelved their Sonoran project.

Susan, please cancel any conf room reservation.

let me know if you have questions.

kh


Ok Team, we are in the last throws of documentation of financing documents!
They will be done by noon.  If anyone has comments, they need to be in before
that.  I also want to receive written confirmation from Accounting, Tax, ENA
Legal, EGF Legal that they have signed off on the documents.   The only
document left outstanding which the legal team is busily working on for
completion [today hopefully?] is the EPC Contract.

Starting on Monday, the legal team needs to begin the closing due diligence
process.  Given that we thought we had a great call with GE this week and got
at least S&S's signoff on consent letter, we haven't heard from anyone.  This
is UNACCEPTABLE since it puts not just TurboPark but all the deals relying on
TurboPark in jeopardy!

I will arrange a meeting on Monday to walk through the closing checklist with
the legal team to insure that everything can be completed by December 13th.

CLOSING WILL OCCUR ON DECEMBER 15TH!

Happy Holidays,
Lisa


----- Forwarded by Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron on 12/13/2000 10:41 AM -----

	Douglas Cummins@ECT
	12/12/2000 06:37 PM

		 To: Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Chaz Vaughan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stephen
Morse/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: Urgent - Please Read - BMC question

Jeff,

Honestly and for your (Enron) eyes only - attached is the modified
spreadsheet of what my group is seriously looking at purchasing.  Basically,
we like their Change Management tools but not really interested in Patrol
(monitoring).

We will have a more definitive answer by Thursday.  We DBA's (eCommerce,
Corp, and London) are trying to make a joint decision, but the other two
groups are dragging out their evaluations...

Regards,
Douglas


I don't ahve it anymore.  Once he changed companies, I didn't get his new
one.  I haven't even talked to him since last fall.
PL


I couldn't open Ajna's email either, this morn.

"Ben Macklowe" <Ben@macklowegallery.com> on 10/26/2000 12:25:13 PM
To: <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: 4 pretty vases

we had resent you 1 and 2, were you able to open those up?  If not, we will
try and resend
----- Original Message -----
From: <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>
To: <Ben@macklowegallery.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: 4 pretty vases

Hi bub, I could only see images 3 and 4.  I couldn't access the mayadon
bowl  or the lenoble.  is there a problem with the viewer in those files?
Stop working so late.  Jeff

"Ben Macklowe" <Ben@macklowegallery.com> on 10/25/2000 07:46:50 PM

To:   <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  4 pretty vases

Jeff: attached is a memo describing the four  email photos you will
receive. It's 9 at night and I'm going  home. Call me when you have
looked this over.

Chowders
Ben
(See attached file: Shankman memo, 10-25-00.doc)


Latest calendars attached.

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


Enerfax Daily
NORTH AMERICA'S FREE POWER AND GAS INFORMATION SOURCE
   Monday, February 4 2002 No. 926
Visit: http://www.enerfax.com  to view our web version or for Oil Prices & News http://www.enerfaxgold.com

PHYSICAL NATURAL GAS PRICES
Gulf/Eastern Region
| Agua Dulce              | 2.06  |
| ANR SE                  | 2.15  |
| Carthage TG             | 2.13  |
| Chicago Citygate        | 2.20  |
| Columbia Gulf Onshore   | 2.17  |
| Dominion South Point    | 2.37  |
| Henry Hub               | 2.19  |
| Houston Ship Channel    | 2.18  |
| Katy Hub                | 2.13  |
| NGPL LA Pool            | 2.14  |
| NGPL - Midcontinent     | 2.07  |
| NGPL STX                | 2.10  |
| NGPL TX/OK              | 2.12  |
| NNG Demarc.             | 2.16  |
| Niagara                 | 2.36  |
| Sonat Tier 1            | 2.16  |
| TCO IPP Pool            | 2.27  |
| Tetco ELa               | 2.16  |
| Tetco M-3               | 2.48  |
| Tetco STX               | 2.08  |
| TGP Zone 0              | 2.11  |
| TGP Zone 1 (500 Leg)    | 2.15  |
| TGT Zone SL             | 2.17  |
| New York Citygate       | 2.56  |
| Transco Station 65      | 2.22  |
| Transco Zone 6 (NY)     | 2.56  |
| Trunk ELa               | 2.15  |
| Western Region
| California Border       | 2.17  |
| El Paso Keystone        | 2.05  |
| El Paso San Juan-Blanco | 2.05  |
| Waha Hub                | 2.10  |
| Canadian/Rockies Region
| Nova/Aeco (C$/gig)      | 2.99  |
| Dawn Hub/Union          | 2.30  |
| Northwest Stanfield     | 2.04  |
| Wyoming Pool            | 1.91  |
| Opal                    | 1.91  |
| PGT-Malin               | 2.10  |
| Sumas                   | 2.00  |
Flow Dates 02/2-4
-------------------------------------------------------------
NATURAL GAS FUTURES
Henry Hub
12 Month Strip  2.5156  -0.0023
18 Month Strip  2.6121  -0.0052
| Month | High  |  Low  | Close | Change |
| MAR   | 2.175 | 2.100 | 2.138 | +0.000 |
| APR   | 2.220 | 2.160 | 2.198 | +0.008 |
| MAY   | 2.280 | 2.240 | 2.266 | +0.008 |
| JUN   | 2.350 | 2.310 | 2.331 | +0.005 |
| JUL   | 2.410 | 2.385 | 2.391 | +0.000 |
| AUG   | 2.465 | 2.425 | 2.446 | -0.002 |
| SEP   | 2.470 | 2.430 | 2.446 | -0.002 |
| OCT   | 2.480 | 2.440 | 2.470 | -0.002 |
| NOV   | 2.710 | 2.650 | 2.695 | -0.004 |
| DEC   | 2.920 | 2.880 | 2.894 | -0.010 |
| JAN   | 3.020 | 2.480 | 2.981 | -0.013 |
| FEB   | 2.960 | 2.480 | 2.931 | -0.016 |
-------------------------------------------------------------

-
RISK MANAGEMENT
Across the Energy Enterprise

e-Acumen, Inc., is uniquely positioned to help you manage risk and increase value. That's because our analytics, data and applications cover all strategic aspects of the energy enterprise, from short-term forecasting to comprehensive risk analysis and portfolio optimization, to asset valuation and weather risk management. Dedicated to the needs
of energy and trading companies in a dynamic and competitive world, our approach combines best-in-class physical fundamentals with industry-leading statistical methodologies.
e-Acumen is a venture-backed company founded in January, 1997. Since then we have listened attentively to the market and assembled a stellar cast of seasoned energy industry professionals and Silicon Valley technologists. Join us as we help the industry continue its path toward liquidity and profitable, risk-managed growth in the exciting years ahead!
Click here  to find out more about current special offers, or go to http://www.e-acumen.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas Futures End Friday Flat

Natural gas futures for March delivery on the NYMEX  ended another boring session flat for the day last Friday at $2.138 per MMBtu. The April contract gained $0.008 to $2.198 per MMBtu. The market opened lower, but was soon boosted by short-term cold and short-covering from speculators and locals pushing as high as $2.165 per MMBtu. Buy-stops were believed to be above $2.17 per MMBtu, and will still likely be there today. Estimated volume Friday was only about 50,400 contracts, with 19,600 of those spreads. There just was not enough volume to hit the buy-stops as the market hovered mostly between $2.14  $2.15. With the market unable to breach $2.17, speculators were forced to back-off late. If $2.17 can be breached today, the market could rise to the next resistance level at $2.22, and then possibly as high as $2.48 before reality once again sinks in. However, if the cash market opens lower this morning, the market may not get a chance to test the resistance. With still ! more than 1 Tcf in excess storage over last year and a relatively mild winter so far, the markets short to medium term bias is still down. Natural gas for weekend delivery across the US and Canada was generally flat to $0.10 higher Friday. Natural gas for weekend delivery at the Henry hub gained $0.05 to $2.19 per MMBu.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Exploit the enterprise-wide transaction management power deployed by the
big names in gas.
NUCLEUS Software
ZAINET Gasmaster
The most comprehensive, totally-integrated natural gas information system
available today.
Ask about out limited-time offer competitive upgrade program.
CAMINUS
Your Competitive Edge in Energy.
Call Caminus at (212)515-3700 or visit the website at http://www.caminus.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Today's Power Bulletins
* Office of Public Utility Council Suing Texas Public Utility Commission Over Rates Default Provider Can Charge in Western Service Territory for TXU Corporation
* PG?Sends Bankruptcy Details to Judge
* AmerenEnergys Trading and Marketing President James Whitesides Resigns
* Niagara Mohawk Continues Western New York Storm Restoration Efforts
* Midwest ISO Implements Next Phase of Commercial Operations Plan
* Sempra Energy Honored in Mexico City for Developing Cross-Border Infrastructure
* Plug Power CEO to Speak at Salomon Smith Barney Distributed Generation and Power Technology Conference Tomorrow in New York
* Nuclear Energy Institute Says Nuclear Power Plants Set Reliability and Output  Records in 2001
* Court Tells VP Cheney to Explain Energy Task Force Secrecy
-------------------------------------------------------------
DO YOU JUST SEE TREES? WE SEE A FOREST!
See the forest with NewEnergy MarketPower by efficiently obtaining information for critical market-based investment decisions and mitigate your risk.
Use MarketPower to determine the effects of transmission congestion, fuel costs, generator availability and load growth on market prices to better execute your company's strategic direction.
Designed specifically for today's energy industry, MarketPower is accurate and easy-to-use, so you can plan for tomorrow...today!
New Ideas...New Solutions...NewEnergy.
For a free 30-day trial visit us at http://www.NewEnergyAssoc.com/justdownloadit  or call us at 770 779 2957 for more information
-------------------------------------------------------------

Enron Power Trading Falls in 4th Quarter

Enrons 4th quarter power trading volumes were about 26% lower than the previous quarter, which is surprising since it was bankrupt for a third of the quarter and in deep trouble for over half of the period. Enron Power Marketing sold almost 221 million MW from October through December, down from about 300 million MW sold during the 3rd quarter. Last week, the FERC began investigating allegations that Enron unfairly raised wholesale power prices during California's power crisis last year. After Enron took a $1.2 billion write-down in shareholder equity related to its off-balance-sheet transactions, other energy firms limited their trading with Enron out of concern credit obligations. In the first 3 quarters of 2001, Enron had about 15% of the nations wholesale power market and AEP was next in line with about an 8% share. The table below shows Enron's biggest customers, the total MW sold and the highest price paid by each for the 4th quarter.

ENRONS TOP 10 CUSTOMERS - 4th-QUARTER 2001

                               Total MW         High Price ($ per MW)
American Electric Power       17,942,497                   317
Williams Energy               16,604,339                   353
Aquila Energy                 15,321,220                   205
Duke Energy                   14,635,810                   335
New York ISO                  13,401,592                   134
Dynegy                        12,923,756                   205
Reliant Energy                10,759,800                   180
Mirant Energy Marketing       10,702,749                   305
El Paso Merchant Energy        8,413,494                   385
PG?Energy Trading            6,885,501                   160
-------------------------------------------------------------
FAST. FLEXIBLE. PROVEN.
The AURORA(TM) electric market model helps you deal with the challenges and risks of today's energy marketplace.
Exceptionally fast and easy to learn, AURORA(TM) reflects fundamental market drivers and gives power marketers, resource developers and portfolio managers a better way to manage against market uncertainty and price volatility.
AURORA delivers -
?	Price forecasts - hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly
?	On-peak, off-peak pricing
?	Resource valuation and net power costs
?	Portfolio analyses
?	Capacity expansion analyses
?	Effects of emissions
?	And much more . . .
AURORA's comprehensive databases cover all electricity markets throughout the U.S. and Canada. The model also handles storage, congestion pricing, and offers detailed reporting and data export capabilities. It can be used as a stand-alone tool or be integrated with your other business tools.
Visit us at http://ww.epis.com  or call (503) 722-2023.
EPIS, Inc.
Market Information Solutions for the Electric Power Marketplace
-------------------------------------------------------------
Natural Gas NYMEX Volume
02MAR   31,239
02APR   11,175
02MAY    4,559
02JUN    3,411
02JLY    2,139
02AUG    5,355
02SEP    2,694
02OCT    1,932
02NOV    1,166
02DEC      912
03JAN    1,188
03FEB    1,473
03MAR    2,151
03APR    1,839
03MAY      482
03JUN    1,329
03JLY      150
03AUG      103
03SEP      132
03OCT      413
03NOV      379
03DEC      506
04JAN      269
04FEB      163
-------------------------------------------------------------
        GET REAL about energy risk management with KWI
In today's fast moving energy markets you need to be able to manage risk in real time.
That means knowing before you hit a risk problem, not afterwards when it may be too late to prevent big losses spreading right through your enterprise.
With kW3000(tm), our multi-commodity, integrated front to back office software, you can monitor your Profit At Risk(tm), counterparty risk and mark-to-market all in real time.
Keep alert to risk. Do it in real time. Call KWI -Americas: +1-281-681-3301 / Europe: +44 (0) 20-7386-2700 / Asia Pacific: +61(0) 2-9976-6111http://www.kwi.com
--------------------------------------------------------------

Mirant Moving to Allay Investor Fears

In an attempt to allay the fears of investors, Mirant plans to sell assets and reduce expenditures to lower its debt. Shares of Mirant have fallen by 50% in the last 2 months, following the downfall of Enron and the downgrade of about $4.9 billion of its debt to junk status by Moodys. Last week, Mirant said that 4th quarter earnings had dropped by 55%, due to lower energy prices and a charge of $66 million from exposure to Enron. It also cut its capital budget by 50% and lowered its earnings forecast in 2002 to $1.60 to $1.70 per share, from its December estimate of  $1.90 to $2.00, because of lower profit margins. Mirant expects 1st quarter profits of $0.30 per share, lower than last years $0.52 per share. Profit for the 4th quarter dipped to $30 million, or $0.09 per share, from $67 million, or $0.20 per share a year ago. Revenue was off 9%, to $7.24 billion from $7.96 billion. Mirant was spun off from Southern Company in September 2000 and the deal was completed last ! April, when Southern distributed 272 million shares, or 80% of Mirant for $9.44 billion. In efforts to distance itself from Enron, Mirant points out that assets, such as power plants, contributed 90% to its profitability, unlike Enron, whose trading unit was responsible for 90% of its 2000 revenue. Mirant has delayed plans to spend $3 billion on tripling its 15,000 MW of power this year. Instead it will limit capital spending to the completion of power plants that will produce 5,700 MW. Mirant will also cut about 65% of job at its German unit, Bewag, which it wants to sell.
-------------------------------------------------------------

ENERGY.
@ENERGY(r), FEA's Complete Suite of Energy Products,
BUILT FOR THE FUTURE.

*Manage all your energy risks.
*Build and Price deals.
*Value physical assets (generation, storage, etc.)
*Report and reduce your energy risks
FEA
FINANCIAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Inc.www.fea.com/?cId=18
Jennifer Cogley
Marketing Department
Financial Engineering Associates
2201 Dwight Way
Berkeley, CA 94704www.fea.com
mailto:jennifer.cogley@fea.com
T. +1 510-549-8702x209
F. +1 510-548-0332
-------------------------------------------------------------
PHYSICAL POWER PRICES
|            | High  |  Low  | Average |
|            | $/MWh | $/MWh |  $/MWh  |
| Cinergy    | 21.00 | 19.00 |  19.40  |
| ECAR       | 22.25 | 16.50 |  20.25  |
| ERCOT      | 21.00 | 18.50 |  19.10  |
| Entergy    | 19.00 | 17.00 |  18.35  |
| TVA        | 23.00 | 20.15 |  22.55  |
| ComEd      | 20.25 | 19.75 |  20.10  |
| Nepool     | 29.50 | 29.25 |  29.30  |
| PJM West   | 22.75 | 21.75 |  22.00  |
| Main       | 20.25 | 18.00 |  19.55  |
| MAPP       | 21.25 | 19.00 |  20.40  |
| Palo Verde | 26.50 | 23.50 |  24.95  |
| Mid C      | 21.00 | 19.00 |  19.60  |
| COB        | 24.00 | 22.00 |  22.60  |
| 4 Corners  | 24.25 | 23.25 |  23.90  |
| Mead       | 25.75 | 24.00 |  24.95  |
| NP 15      | 27.00 | 24.00 |  24.80  |
| SP 15      | 27.50 | 24.00 |  25.35  |
-------------------------------------------------------------

Baker Hughes Weekly Rig Count

The number of rigs searching for oil and natural gas in the US fell by 6 to 853 last week, according to Baker Hughes. The total was down from 1,138 a year ago. The number searching in Canada was down 7 to 452, compared to 579 a ago. The number of rigs in the Gulf of Mexico was down 3 to 114, compared to 159 a year ago. In the US, the number searching on land was 714, and the number offshore was 121. Eighteen were operating in inland waters. The total North American rig count fell by 13 to 1,305, down from 1,717 a year ago.
-------------------------------------------------------------

OPEN SEASON
SG Resources Mississippi, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of SGR Holdings, L.L.C., is conducting an open season for firm storage services at its new high-deliverability, salt cavern, natural gas storage facility, known as the Southern Pines Energy Center. The open season will begin at 9:00 a.m. CDT on February 4, 2002, and will continue until 5:00 p.m. CDT on March 4, 2002. The project is located at the border of Mississippi and Alabama with access to the major pipelines serving the Mid-Atlantic and the Southeastern United States. The facility is ideally located to serve as a transportation and storage hub for shippers on any one of nine major pipelines that will be interconnected directly or indirectly to the project. Information on the facility and the Open Season is available on our web site at          http://www.sgr-holdings.com
or contact us at 713-914-8188.
-------------------------------------------------------------

Todays Gas Bulletins
* S?May Cut Williams Credit Rating
* Ex-Enron CEO Ken Lay Breaks Silence with Testimony in Front of Congressional Hearing Today; Former CEO Jeff Skilling and Former CFO Andrew Fastow to Testify Thursday in Front of House Energy and Commerce Committee.
* President Bush Touts Pension Reform Without Mentioning Enron
* Transco to Pay $1.4 Million Fine and Clean Up Soil and Groundwater Contamination
* Andersens British Clients Seek Further Assurances Company Still Viable
* Justice Department Tells White House Not to Destroy Enron Papers
* House of Representatives Democrat Waxman Wants to Interview Army Secretary Thomas White This Week About Role as Former Senior Executive at Enron
* NiSource Credit Rating Cut to Lowest Investment Grade Above Junk
* Williams Companies and Williams Communications and Officers and Directors
Sued on Behalf of Investors
------------------------------------------------------------

 Ziff Energy Group presents
Gas Storage 2002
Redefining the Fundamentals:
Is Gas Still in the Storage Game?
Power Drives Storage
Will the recession affect plant and storage development?
Will record high volumes in storage further depress gas prices?
Is it possible to mitigate storage risk while dealing with year-round price
volatility?
Plus
Two Important Workshops
Calpine Corporation
Hear what the Power Generator wants from the storage industry
Bruce Bernard
Learn from the expert how to mitigate storage price risk in the 2002 gas
marketplace
February 6 & 7
Houston
Four Season Hotel
1300 Lamar Street
Register Today for this Important Conference
Call 1-800-853-6252
Email: gasconference@ziffenergy.com
Visit: http://www.ziffenergyconferences.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Midwest ISO Begins Selling Regional Transmission Service

The Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator has implemented its tariff and will now provide regional transmission service for bulk power in the Midwest ISO footprint. Transmission customers are now able to request transmission service from Midwest ISO without going to individual transmission owners. The Midwest ISO, which serves 21 transmission owners in 15 states, is responsible for evaluating and coordinating requests for access to the regional power grid on a non-discriminatory basis. The Midwest ISO says that transmission customers in the Midwest will now benefit from standardized rates, terms and conditions for service over its 86,000 miles of transmission lines. Transmission customers are now able to request transmission service from the MISO's OASIS website, giving them the ability to view transmission availability data at the same time and request transmission service in the same manner. It also provides for streamlined electronic scheduling which allows! customers to easily schedule approved transactions for service across multiple control areas in the MISO footprint. In addition, customers will now have access to an independent, regional analysis of bulk power flows utilizing a standard methodology. The MISO will provide a single bill to customers for all transmission service provided.
-------------------------------------------------------------
R. W. Beck is an engineering and management consulting firm serving utilities, developers, financiers and governments worldwide.  Founded in 1942, we help our clients face energy market challenges by providing:
Portfolio Analysis to improve diversification and risk-adjusted performance of energy assets.
Risk Control to help reduce the probability of losses.
Asset Valuation to understand the market value and risk characteristics of physical and financial energy assets.
Training to improve your ability to identify and manage tactical and strategic risks.

Please visit our web site at http://www.rwbeck.com

-------------------------------------------------------------
POWER FUTURES
| Month |   COB   | Change |   PV    | Change |
| MAR   |  19.25  | +0.25  |  21.25  | -0.20  |
| APR   |  19.75  | +0.00  |  22.50  | -0.25  |
| MAY   |  19.50  | +0.50  |  24.50  | +0.25  |
| JUN   |  20.00  | -1.00  |  27.50  | +0.25  |
| JUL   |  26.50  | -2.00  |  37.50  | +0.00  |
| AUG   |  38.00  | -0.50  |  42.50  | -0.25  |
| SEP   |  26.00  | -6.00  |  32.50  | -0.50  |
| OCT   |  24.00  | -5.00  |  29.00  | +1.00  |
| NOV   |  24.50  | -3.75  |  27.50  | +0.50  |
| DEC   |  26.00  | -4.00  |  28.50  | +1.00  |
| JAN   |  30.00  | +0.00  |  28.50  | -0.50  |
| FEB   |  27.50  | +0.00  |  27.75  | -0.75  |
| Month | Entergy | Change | Cinergy | Change |
| MAR   |  20.00  | +0.40  |  21.30  | -0.10  |
| APR   |  20.00  | +0.40  |  21.50  | +0.10  |
| MAY   |  22.50  | -0.60  |  24.50  | -0.25  |
| JUN   |  27.10  | -0.40  |  29.80  | +0.05  |
| JUL   |  34.65  | -0.35  |  38.40  | +0.05  |
| AUG   |  34.65  | -0.35  |  38.40  | +0.15  |
| SEP   |  21.70  | -0.05  |  23.15  | -0.10  |
| OCT   |  21.95  | -0.05  |  23.00  | +0.00  |
| NOV   |  21.95  | -0.05  |  23.00  | +0.00  |
| DEC   |  21.95  | -0.05  |  23.00  | +0.00  |
| JAN   |  24.25  | +0.00  |  26.00  | -0.10  |
| FEB   |  24.25  | +0.00  |  26.00  | -0.10  |
------------------------------------------------------------
Power Futures
| Month |  PJM  | Change |
| MAR   | 25.10 | +0.20  |
| APR   | 25.10 | +0.20  |
| MAY   | 28.55 | -0.05  |
| JUN   | 35.25 | -0.25  |
| JUL   | 46.35 | +0.15  |
| AUG   | 46.35 | +0.15  |
| SEP   | 27.10 | +0.10  |
| OCT   | 26.10 | +0.10  |
| NOV   | 26.10 | +0.10  |
| DEC   | 26.10 | +0.10  |
| JAN   | 30.25 | -0.10  |
| FEB   | 30.25 | -0.10  |
-------------------------------------------------------------

Commodity Futures Trading Commission
NYMEX Natural Gas Futures
Reportable Positions as of  1/29/02

Open Interest: 465,995                                  10,000 MMBtu
Nonreportable
Non-Commercial         |   Commercial |     Total    | Positions
Long | Short| Spreading| Long | Short | Long | Short | Long  | Short
11,147 59,577  40,707  377,068 333,282 428,922 433,566 37,073 32,429
Changes from 1/22/02                Change in Open Interest: -23,395
7,861 6,352  -2,837  -26,347 11,959 21,323  21,148 -2,072 -2,247
Percent of Open Interest for Each Category of Traders
2.4   12.8      8.7     80.9    71.5   92.0     93.0     8.0   7.0
---------------------------------------

Wisconsin Energy Power Plant Plan

Wisconsin Energy plans to build $3 billion in new electricity generators over the next nine years to meet growing energy demands. Forecasts indicate Wisconsin will need more than the 2,800 MW the new units will generate by 2011. The projects include 2 natural gas fired generators and 3 coal burning units at existing power plants. Other power producers including Calpine and Mirant have delayed new construction in the state because of lower electricity demand and prices. The first natural gas fired should be under construction by early next year to be in service before the summer of 2005. Wisconsin Energy has created a subsidiary that would build and own the generators and lease them back to the utility for up to 25 years. Calpine, Enron and PG?had opposed the proposal, saying it would delay deregulation in the state by more than a decade.
-------------------------------------------------------------

           Progas Storage and Services, Inc.
Progas can custom build gas storage in the Upper Midwest.

? Design to your specifications
? Close to your markets
? Unregulated storage
? Lower transportation fees
? Lower storage rates
Progas is now accepting proposals and orders for years 2002-2007 for approxamately 5 bcf of storage on Midwestern system serving Indiana, Illinois, and 3 bcf on Texas Gas Transmission system serving Tennessee, northern Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio.  Additional potential storage filds beding acquired at this time on Midwestern, anhandle Eastern and A & R (Coastal) systems serving the Upper Midwest. Inquiries from potential partners, investment bankers, and brokers welcome.

Progas Storage and Services, Inc.
8610 South Highway 277
Abilene, TX 79606
Phone: 915-698-3699
Fax: 915-698-2859
Email: gastorage@aol.com
-------------------------------------------------------------

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The TSE 300 gained 42.02 points to 7690.57
The CRB Index climbed 2.22 points to 189.51
The US Dollar decreased 0.38 points to 119.79
The Dow declined 12.74 points to 9907.26
The S?500 lost 8.00 points to 1122.20
The Nasdaq was down 22.79 points to 1911.24
March NYMEX Crude Oil added 0.90 to 20.38
Canadian-US Exchange fell 0.0016 to 1.5907
-------------------------------------------------------------

ENERGY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Higher Education for refined product professionals

NOW ENROLLING RISK MANAGEMENT COURSES: PROFESSIONAL GASOLINE AND DISTILLATE
MANAGEMENT, PETROLEUM MARKETER, and  ADVANCED GASOLINE AND DISTILLATE MASTER
LEVEL.
REGISTER NOW, CLASS SIZES ARE LIMITED.
SEE COMPLETE DETAILS CLICK HERE :http://www.energyinstitution.org
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pure Text, Lotus, AOL, Yahoo, Excite, Readers-subscribe by writing to:enerfax-subscribe@egroups.com
Outlook Email Readers-subscribe to webmail by writing to:
mailto:join-EnerfaxDaily@relay.netatlantic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
To view past issues of Enerfax Daily -Sign up for free at  Divines Sagewave at
http://www.sagewave.com/D2/autolog/common/log.asp?KEY=enerfax
-------------------------------------------------------------

Please welcome our advertisers by visiting these websites.http://www.e-acumen.com http://www.kwi.com/ http://www.fea.com/ http://www.caminus.com/ http://www.progas.net/wip http://www.ziffenergyconferences.com/ http://www.energyseminars.com http://www.epis.com http://www.rwbeck.com  http://www.NewEnergyAssoc.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .


At the request of Paul Finken, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.  If the enclosed meets with your approval, please
mail or fax an executed copy to me.  If you have any comments or questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399.  My fax number is (713)
636-3490.


Phillip,

I need to get the contract for Galaxy and Grande executed today. In addition
I will need to close the loan at the title company in Hays County this week.
If you elect me vice-president of Bishops Corner, Inc., I can take care of
all of the documents.  From a logistics standpoint this probably would be
the best way to handle it.

Please let me know today if possible so I can send them to the lender.

Sincerely,

Greg Thorse


please remove my email address from your distribution list.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	National Brands <NationalBrands@processrequest.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:16 AM
To:	KWARD@ECT.ENRON.COM
Subject:	Get FREE Shipping & Handling from Fingerhut.com!

[IMAGE]
Fingerhut.comSpecial e-mail offer

 Shop now for the holidays with this special introductory offer!  [IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE] Place your first order at Fingerhut.com and get FREE SHIPPING & HANDLING  on almost every product on our site!    We make it easy to shop for the holidays, whether you want decorations for your home, cookware for making a holiday feast or the latest DVD  player for a great gift. You'll find it all in our Holiday Store!   Plus, stop in for some seasonal fun - send a Santa E-mail or a holiday e-card!  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] << File: http://www.prq0.com/apps/redir.asp?link=XbcihbdeCG,YjcbjcbdeDB&oid=UcjgbBI >>   Plus, sign up at Fingerhut.com to enjoy:    Faster Ordering and Checkout Instant Order Status   Exclusive E-mail Offers    We have it all for you at Fingerhut.com!    Name-Brand Quality  Thousands of Products  Real-Time Product Availability Check  Online Giveaways and Sweepstakes  Apply for the Fingerhut Credit Advantage
 Card  Total Online Security [IMAGE]  Shop Fingerhut.com today! << File: http://www.prq0.com/apps/redir.asp?link=XbcihbdeCG,YjcbjcbdeDB&oid=UcjgbBI >>

If you no longer wish to recieve future mailings as a National Brands Member, click here << File: http://www.prq0.com/apps/remove2.asp?oid=UcjgbBI&sid=XbcihbddCF&cid=YjcbjcbdeDB >>  to unsubscribe. [IMAGE]


You may want to clarify this with Keegan as 1) your voice mail was full on
that Friday, 2) Keegan tried to contact you in New York and the number she
had for you was disconnected, and 3) we tried to locate the documents that
Friday and were not able to.

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	05/21/2001 11:00 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment
(increase from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et
al

Sara,

Moreover, Keegan represented to me that you requested that she locate for you
the Securities Loan Agreement for you while I was out and that she went into
my office and retrieved that document from my Enron Credit Inc. file and gave
it to you.  So, I am not sure of the source of confusion about not being able
to find my file but for future reference, the best thing to do is to ask
Keegan how to contact me immediately and directly - when out the office she
always knows how to reach me.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	05/21/2001 10:36 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment
(increase from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et
al

Sara:

I will forward the documents to you.

For future reference, if anyone is looking for a file for an urgent matter
while I am out, she should convey that fact to me by either (1) leaving a
voice mail - as I checked my voicemails on Friday (that is how I was able to
speak with Tom from New York on Friday) or (2) advise Keegan and she will
contact me immediately by cell phone as she did regarding other matters on
Friday.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	05/15/2001 03:45 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tom Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment (increase
from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et al

Cheryl:

I spoke with Clem and he is preparing the amendment for immediate execution
as the signers will be at an offsite tomorrow.  I'll let Tom know as soon as
the amendment has been executed.  Anna Meytina is on vacation so I left a
message with Sharon Chernick.

In order to complete our files with respect to the Enron North America Inc.
("ENA") Securities Loan Agreement, please provide me with copies of the
following documents:

(1)  assignment of the Securities Loan Agreement from ENA to ECI (or was a
separate agreement with ECI executed?)

(2) termination of the prior Enron Corp. guaranty on behalf of ENA in the
amount of  USD25 Million

I spoke with Stephanie and she could not locate your Bear/ECI files on Friday
of last week.

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Conference Call Participants:

A conference call regarding STORAGE SERVICES originally scheduled for
Thursday, December 7th from 10-11AM CST has been rescheduled to Friday, 12/8
from 11AM-12 noon, CST.  Please note the conference call in and passcode
numbers below.

Ravi Thuraisingham, Director, Enron Broadband Services (EBS) will lead
discussions regarding EBS' storage initiatives and Chris Roberson, Hewlett
Packard Storage Solutions Architect, will lead HP storage solutions
discussions.  Matt Harris, Vice President, EBS and Patrick Tucker, Manager,
EBS are leading the origination efforts between HP and Enron.

Conference Call Dial Up Number:  1-800-991-9019
Passcode #:  6835918 #  (Note:  the # sign must be input after the passcode)

Subsequent to the conference call, future meetings and strategy on Enron/HP
storage initiatives will be decided.
Please call if any questions or agenda changes

Sarah-Joy Hunter
Enron Corporation
Global Strategic Sourcing, Business Development
#(713)-345-6541.


Tana,

The Ajilon signed NDA has been returned to your attention via fax no. (713)
646-3490.  Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Respectfully,

Ken Keefer

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:53 PM
To: kkeefer@ajilon.com
Cc: John.Allario@enron.com; Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
Subject: NDA - Ajilon LLC

At the request of John Allario, I am attaching our proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.   If the enclosed meets with your approval,
please execute the agreement and return it to me via fax no. (713)
646-3490.  I will then have it executed by Enron.  If you have any comments
or questions please call Mark Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at (713) 345-8897
or me at (713) 853-3399.  We look forward to hearing from you.

(See attached file: ajilon.doc)


Attached in very draft form is EPMI/EES's response against Dynegy's request that ComEd not allow Firm LD to be designated as a Network transmission resource.  Please provide comments by COB Thurs 10/25.  Thanks.

Susan Lindberg 30596 and Christi Nicolay 37007.


Attached is the link to the main transmission study.

It contains some great bubble drawings as well as some key transmission
information on major flowgates.

Note it looks like TVA's transfer capability for the winter has been
significantly been reduced versus the 99/00 study.

Please review this document for significant items that affect your markets
and prepare an applicable brief for your traders.

thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 12:20 PM
---------------------------

"Teri L. Harrop" <tlh@maininc.org> on 11/16/2000 12:48:26 PM
To: bodplus@maininc.org, ecplus@maininc.org, ocplus@maininc.org,
marketinterfaceplus@maininc.org
cc: kpm@maininc.org
Subject: MAIN Winter 2000/2001 TASG Report

The MAIN Winter 2000/2001 TASG report is available in electronic PDF
format via the following link:

http://www.maininc.org/files/tasg00w.pdf

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Kerry Marinan                           Email: kpm@maininc.org
Senior Engineer                         Phone # (630)261-2606
Office hours: 11/1->11/30 0800->1800+    Fax #   (630)691-4222
-----------------------------------------------------------------


For your information... another Transwestern story just appearing on the wire.

Natural Gas Intelligence
the weekly gas market newsletter
published : September 3, 2001
Transwestern Denies Withheld Capacity to Boost Negotiated Deals
A Transwestern Pipeline executive last week dismissed allegations that the pipeline withheld firm transportation capacity for service to California from recourse-rate shippers last winter by arranging substantially more lucrative negotiated-rate deals prior to posting available capacity to its web site.
Mary Kay Miller, vice president of rates and certificates, acknowledged Transwestern may have had discussions and exchanged faxes last January (prior to posting its available capacity) with two shippers -- Sempra Energy and Richardson Products II Ltd. -- that subsequently entered into negotiated-rate transactions for February and March on the pipeline. But she stressed that any requests for capacity by Sempra Energy and Richardson were considered "moot" by the pipeline until after the available operational capacity was posted.
"Even if they would have sent...a fax the day before" the capacity became available, "it would have been irrelevant because there was no capacity posted" at that time, said Miller. Capacity requests that came in prior to Jan. 31, the day that available capacity was posted for February contracts on Transwestern, were "null and void." The only "relevant" ones were those that Transwestern received on or after Jan. 31, she noted.
Miller spent much of last Wednesday on the stand being quizzed by lawyers for FERC and producers about Transwestern's methods for notifying customers about available capacity, the manner in which it chooses winning bids and about its pre-posting contacts with Sempra Energy and Richardson.
It was the first day of the FERC hearing exploring charges that Transwestern exercised market power in awarding negotiated-rate contracts that led to shippers being charged as much as $27/MMBtu last February, far in excess of the pipeline's maximum allowed rate of 38 cents/MMBtu for firm transportation service to the California border (See NGI, July 30 <n20010730f.html>). The Commission proceeding last Wednesday focused on the four negotiated-rate contracts of Sempra Energy and Richardson for a total 45,000 MMBtu/d of service on Transwestern during February and March.
Richardson and Sempra "clearly did not have any 'deal' entitling them to the posted capacity before it was posted," Miller said in prepared rebuttal testimony. The two companies "had the right to the capacity only 'after' they submitted their bids, 'after' the posting period ended, 'after' Transwestern determined that no other bids were submitted, and 'after' a contract was agreed upon between Transwestern, Richardson or Sempra," she noted.
Despite claims made by FERC energy industry analyst Barry E. Sullivan to the contrary, "Transwestern did not withhold capacity that otherwise could have been made available under recourse rates in order to make the capacity available under substantially higher negotiated rates," Miller testified.
She noted that even Sempra Energy and Richardson, in response to a data request by Southern California Edison, backed Transwestern's claims. Both companies replied "no" when asked whether "any employee of Transwestern or any Transwestern affiliate ever indicated at any time that Transwestern would not provide the capacity at the maximum tariff rate."
The "capacity at issue was offered on Transwestern's web site at the recourse rate in the exact same manner that all other capacity is offered on Transwestern's web site at the recourse rate; there was no prohibition, restrictions, limitation, condition or suggestion that a potential shipper could not bid for the capacity at the recourse rate; and any potential shipper, including Richardson or Sempra, could have submitted a bid for the capacity at the recourse rate."
FERC's Sullivan contends that Transwestern's motive for allegedly advancing negotiated-rate transactions at the expense of recourse-rate deals was pure profit. Under questioning by Thomas J. Burgess of FERC's OMTR, Miller estimated that Transwestern earned $1.8 million from Sempra Energy's contract in March, $1.3 million from Richardson's March contract, and a "comparable" amount from Richardson's February contract. She noted the pipeline received a "substantially higher" amount as a result of Sempra's February contract arrangement, but she didn't provide an exact figure. FERC's Sullivan estimated the pipeline's profit from the Sempra February contract was more than $5 million.
Sullivan said that much of the profits that wound up in Transwestern's coffers would have gone to Sempra Energy and Richardson if they have been able to acquire the capacity at recourse rates. But Miller countered that the Commission's negotiated-rate policy "does not require a minimum level of profit to shippers or contemplate any hindsight analysis of whether shippers could have gotten a better deal or made more profits."
Furthermore, she said the Transwestern case shouldn't be used to consider changes to the negotiated-rate policy, as Sullivan had suggested. This case "is the wrong forum for such an issue because modifying the negotiated-rate policy should only be done on an industry-wide basis so no pipeline or group of pipeline customers is competitively disadvantaged."
In prepared testimony filed in the case, FERC's Sullivan accused Transwestern of illegally charging shippers market-based rates for firm transportation capacity to the California border earlier this year "under the guise of negotiated rates."
The Commission "has never granted Transwestern the authority to charge market-based rates for interstate natural gas transportation. Nevertheless, in the dysfunctional Southern California natural gas market, and in particular during the recent January 2001 to March 2001 period...Transwestern clearly exercised its market power to arrange negotiated-rate deals before properly posting [its] operationally available capacity on its web site," charged Sullivan, a member of the FERC Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates' Division of Litigation.
Transwestern discussed potential negotiated-rate transactions with Sempra Energy and Richardson prior to actually posting the available capacity on its web site, Sullivan claims. Because the level of capacity that would be available at the recourse rate is unknown at that stage (before posting), some shippers might be more "willing to enter into negotiated-rate contracts above the recourse rate, in the hope of securing some of the capacity if and when [it] became available," he noted. They "might agree to a negotiated rate...even without receiving additional value or service" because they are "either unsure or concerned that the capacity will not be made available at the recourse rate."
This is tantamount to withholding of capacity on Transwestern, Sullivan charged. "The reason this behavior is problematic is that Transwestern is able to capture part of the price differential" between the California border and the Southwest producing basins "by threatening to withhold the capacity unless the shipper agrees to the negotiated rates."
Although the capacity was posted by Transwestern for one business day and open to all of the pipeline's shippers at maximum recourse rates, "no party other than the shippers (Sempra and Richardson) that actually acquired the capacity [at negotiated rates], bid on this short-term excess firm capacity," Sullivan said.
He said he found this puzzling. "At that time, capacity into southern California was at a premium...Shippers could make extraordinary profits if they could move gas to southern California. Yet, no other shippers bid on this capacity, even at a discounted rate."
If, however, another shipper had submitted a recourse-rate bid for available capacity, Transwestern's Miller said it would have been treated in the same manner as Sempra Energy's and Richardson's negotiated-rate bids. The pipeline would have held a lottery under which it would have "randomly selected the winner," she noted. "Thus, the willingness of Richardson and Sempra to pay a negotiated rate above the recourse rate did not provide them with any preference..."
Sullivan said he found it hard to believe that Sempra Energy and Richardson readily agreed to negotiated-rate transactions, where they came out the losers and Transwestern reaped huge profits. It "is difficult to accept the conclusion that one of these shippers [Sempra] willingly negotiated away a virtually risk-free profit of approximately $5 million, settling instead for a completely risk-free profit of approximately $200,000, while another [Richardson] willingly agreed to forego additional profits of almost $2 million."
If Sempra Energy had acquired the capacity at Transwestern's maximum recourse rate, Sullivan estimated that the company's profits would have been more than $5.2 million, compared to the estimated $210,000 that it received under the negotiated-rate deal. Richardson's profits from the capacity would have been almost double those of last February -- $3.4 million rather than $1.8 million, he said.
Transwestern, on the other hand, received more than $5 million as a result of its contract arrangement with Sempra Energy last February, he calculated, and about $1.8 million from the Richardson contract arrangement.
Transwestern witnesses said Sempra Energy and Richardson agreed to the negotiated-rate deals -- and smaller profits -- to avoid paying demand costs in the event their gas did not flow. But Sullivan called this argument "spurious" since the "contracts were for day-to-day service, with either party able to cancel with two hours notice."
Moreover, he noted that Sempra Energy would have had to pay only $5,700/day under its February contract deal of 15,000 MMBtu/d if the gas had not flowed and Sempra failed to give Transwestern two hours notice. "Clearly, the downside risk was minimal when compared to the potential upside gain."
The price differential between the southern California border and the Southwest producing basins would have had to slip below $1.18 for the negotiated rates to have been a better business deal for Sempra Energy than the recourse rate, Sullivan said. But last January, the price differentials ranged from a low of $5.01 to a high of $9.25, with a ten-day average of $7.36.


See the attached file changed to reflect the change to the gathering fee
amount.


Well, I got selected.  The judge estimated that we would probably be there
through Friday.  I will be in the office each morning until 9:15 and may
return some evenings.  If you need anything, you can leave me a voice mail or
call Liz and Stacey.

D


Attached is the Global Contracts report for all physical gas/financial assignments, terminations, and expirations for the month of October.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
SBR x30569


John,

I saw it. Very interesting.

Vince

"John H Herbert" <jhh1@email.msn.com> on 07/28/2000 08:38:08 AM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Light reading - see pieces beginning on page 7

Cheers and have a nice weekend,

JHHerbert

 - gd000728.pdf


Attached is your proposed language with my comments redlined.  Please review.  I would be happy to discuss.  I can be reached at (713) 853-3512.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kyle Webster <KWebster@eprod.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Kyle+20Webster+20+3CKWebster+40eprod+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:03 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Grant of Servitude between LRCI, Inc. and Sorrento Pipeline Compa	ny, L.L.C.

Mr. Nemec,

Please see the attachment. <<LRCI Termination Clause 9-10-01.doc>>

Kyle Webster
Senior Landman
Enterprise Products Operating LP
P.O. Box 4324
Houston, Texas 77210-4324
713-803-8206 Office
713-803-8290 Fax
KWebster@eprod.com

 - LRCI Termination Clause 9-10-01.doc << File: LRCI Termination Clause 9-10-01.doc >>


Justin and Edmund:

I understand that the two of you are the key legal contacts in London on
EnronOnline, and I thought that I should contact you regarding
Clickpaper.com, Enron Net Works' new e-commerce initiative.

Enron is planning to launch next week (with a formal launch in connection
with Enron Corp.'s analyst meeting on July 25) of a website for Enron's
trading of pulp and paper products.  The business model is similar to that of
EnronOnline, but since this website will have a more targeted audience, we
can expect a broader product offering and greater volumes than is currently
traded on EnronOnline.  It is anticipated that the site will ultimately have
global counterparties and will trade physical products at several "hubs"
around the world, although operations will initially be more or less limited
to the U.S. and Canada.

I understand that the London office has done substantially all of the legal
work associated with enabling global counterparties to trade on EnronOnline
(such as adopting appropriate password applications and electronic trading
agreements and addressing legal issues associated with electronic trading of
financial and physical products).  While much of that work will be
transferable to Clickpaper, there may be some unique issues.

I'm not sure if anyone has discussed how to handle the legal work for
Clickpaper as it expands into European markets, but I thought that I should
raise the issue.  I don't expect a huge volume of work immediately -- it will
probably trickle in as the traders expand their operations -- but at some
point it could become a substantial effort.

I would appreciate any thoughts that you have.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


confused... what are you disagreeing with me in regards to demand destruction?

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/07/2001 08:55 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: rebuttal

I am definitely a bigger fan of the crude complex for the next few months.
Agree the defcon 5 bubble has burst for natgas. Disagree about the demand
destruction.
? I think some demand is just permanently gone ( i.3. cheaper BTUs in ASIA-
Pacific and plants just wont run here anymore). But I think that we are
underestimating the structural changes in energy demand. Just as the economy
is less dependent on heavy industry for its health, energy demand is
changing. Since just about everyone missed the boat on the increased power
demand as a result of  Silicon Valley, I think we don't have a good handle on
what the drivers of the new power generation really are.So what i'm saying
is  that industrial demand will weaken, demand in service based industries
will increase. Also energy is a much smaller component of the cost structure
in service industries.
? Also I think in 2000, people had sticker shock-- they couldn't have
imagined 10$ gas, but now that volatility and higher prices are firmly
entrenched in their minds --- they will find ways of running their factories.
Also they will  budget for these prices instead of $2.50
? See NG Week (3/5/01) Nevada power price hikes affecting casinos ---
increases of 20%. When asked the implication for missed earnings and their
plans for demand conservation, one casino official replied 'We're in the
bright lights business'
? I don't believe the economic doom and gloom
 First of all no one wants a repeat of the 1990 recession ( which was much
worse outside of the US) Every central bank in the G7 has or will cut rates
this week. The US will follow suit or it will have a very expensive dollar
which will blow exports. With all of the monetary slack, consumer credit will
not tighten and thus buying will continue ( witness the lack of destruction
in big ticket items purchasing). Heavy manufacturing is contracting but this
is not everything. Productivity gains are strong. The economy is becoming
more service based and traditional industrial barometers are not telling the
whole story.
? Finally, I am London and it is not doom and gloom over here.

well there's my 2 cents.

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: RE:

i think jv strip prices to where we price out enough demand to get to 2.8.
whther that price level is 425 or 725 is arguable.  i think it's close to
here.  but when we get to november and we have 2.8 and don;'t repeat the
weather of this past winter and we have 2.5 bcf more supply and people
realize that we have 2.3 bcf to withdraw before there are any
problems...bombs away.

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/07/2001 01:00 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:

Why do you think nov mar is worth $3.75?
Also whats your schedule looking like next week----care to meet for a
beverage?

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 5:03 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: Re:

  What it's trading  what I think it's really worth
apr oct   540    500
nov mar 547    375
cal 2  491    400
cal 3   460    325

Obviously most bearish the further out you go.  However, the game right now
is not sell and hold...although it will be soon.  The game is where will it
be tomorrow and next week and next month.  The market is structurally short
term gas thanks to our friends from california.  where ca is buying power,
williams and calpine and dynegy dont care of the gas costs 450 or 475 or 500
or 525.  irrelevant.  so term is not going down in the short term unless the
front comes into the 400's and scares some producers to start hedging or we
or el paso can find fixed price lng to the tune of 250,000 a day for 10 years.

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 10:37 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

what are your thoughts on

ap-oct
nov-mar
02
03

price levels and outlooks
 thanks
Jen Fraser
713-853-4759


thanks for sending me another chain letter.  i am very superstitious.


I've received some feedback from the Real Time group regarding these
counterparty discrepancies. Apparently, they were never given notice of the
correct counterparty names, and chose what seemed to be the most logical
name. Can we come up with a system or master list of usable counterparty
names for these guys to refer to when faced with an array of choices? (i.e.
There are five different names under Transalta.)

The concern lies with our daily correction report, which I generate and which
includes all deals that have been changed and the name of the person who made
the "error." This report can weigh unfairly against a trader who may be
unaware of the difference between "Dynegy Marketing & Trade" and "Dynegy
Power Marketing." I feel like there has to be a more efficient way to avoid
these errors than publishing them in a report that gets sent throughout the
company.

If you could help me compile this master list, or direct me to someone who
can, I would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
01/30/2001 09:14 AM
To: Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Geir Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT, Juan
Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leaf Harasin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ryan
Slinger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David V Porter/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Incorrect Counterparties

I have changed the following deals b/c the selected CPs are incorrect.  Also,
please remember not to pick CPs in brackets as they are inactive.  Thank you
for your help.

507901 should be Allegheny Power, Transmission Business Unit
507842 should be Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.
506767 should be NRG Power Marketing, Inc.
507900 should be PJM Interconnection LLC
506618 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506727 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.
506747 should beTransalta Energy Marketing (US) Inc.


Ronnie,

regarding the parking situation downtown
The closest parking garage with visitor parking is the one at Allens Center.

your agenda, to define
- what the scope of the project is
- what do you expect of the project -- in other words what are you trying to
find out from the study, this will help define the scope
-discuss a timeline
-tools that we can use at Enron
-are there any projects at Enron (past or present) that we can draw on or
build on

sounds good.  Do you all have the original scope Vince wrote up?  Although it
is broad, its a good beginning for your scope.  Once you flesh-out the scope,
we'll see if any existing reports can be found that may be helpful.

regarding industry research

check out red herring and other online resources.

see you later

ken


thx

Jeanie Slone
12/19/2000 04:51 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: confidential employee information-dutch quigley

Dutch requested a meeting with me today and I gave him the scoop on the
promotion.  I will follow-up with him after our meeting the first week of
Jan.  He was ok with everything.  let me know if you need anything else.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeanie Slone/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 04:45
PM ---------------------------

Jeanie Slone
12/19/2000 10:09 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: confidential employee information-dutch quigley

John,
As we discussed earlier, ENA HR is working with the A/A program to develop a
process for placing sr. spec into associate titles.  Unfortunately, that
process has not been finalized and as such, Dutch is not yet an associate.
Ted is finalizing the process this week and it will likely require Dutch to
interview with 4 other commercial managers outside of ENA.

Additionally, there are two other sr. spec. on the gas trading floor in
similar situations and we will be discussing them at a promotion meeting to
be held the first week of Jan.  I would like to handle all of these
consistently and had planned to include Dutch's promotion in this
discussion.  I would recommend that we hold on a title change for Dutch until
after this meeting and manage it through the promotions process.

Per the message attached below, Dutch believes he has already received the
title change.  Please clarify the situation with him at your earliest
convenience.  If you need my assistance with this please let me know.   I
apologize if there was any confusion from our previous discussions.  Please
contact me with any questions/concerns.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeanie Slone/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 09:21
AM ---------------------------

people.finder@ENRON
12/19/2000 09:19 AM
Sent by: Felicia Buenrostro@ENRON
To: Dutch.Quigley@enron.com
cc: Jeanie Slone/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: PeopleFinder Feedback

Dutch,

Unfortunately, I cannot make that change for you.

Please contacct your HR Rep (Jeanne Slone).  Your HR Rep can only change your
title.

Thanks.

Felicia

Dutch.Quigley@enron.com on 12/18/2000 08:05:19 AM
To: people.finder@enron.com
cc:

Subject: PeopleFinder Feedback

My job title needs to be updated to ASSOCIATE.

Dutch


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <bambos@stanford.edu>
Received: from  rly-yc03.mx.aol.com (rly-yc03.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.35])
by air-yc05.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.8) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Oct 2000 14:29:58
-0400
Received: from  smtp.Stanford.EDU (smtp.stanford.edu [171.64.14.23]) by
rly-yc03.mx.aol.com (v75_b3.9) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Oct 2000 14:28:30 -0400
Received: from stanford.edu (dialup-209.245.133.121.SanJose1.Level3.net
[209.245.133.121]) by smtp.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01053;
Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <39DE1B0A.78F8F5F@stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 11:33:46 -0700
From: Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,el
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, vkaminski@aol.com, gappy@stanford.edu
Subject: Re: Enron/Stanford Program
References: <OFCEE0E4C8.69D74622-ON86256969.0068763E@enron.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Vince,

I have managed to change my ticket and we can meet for dinner on Sunday
10/15/00.
Shall we say at 7pm?

>>>>Giuseppe: Can you please join us for dinner on Sunday 10/15. We'd like to
briefly
discuss the project too. Could I please ask you to make reservations for 3 at
Il Fornaio or some other nice place in Palo Alto? Preferably a quiet place
where
we can talk.<<<<

Thanks,

Nick

Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> Nick,
>
> Dinner on Sunday would work  for me. I shall stay
> in the Bay area till Monday morning.
>
> Vince
>
> Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 09/28/2000 08:33:38 PM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Enron/Stanford Program
>
> Hi Vince,
>
> I am on the technical program committee of the Infocom 2001 conference,
> and we are meeting in New York City on Saturday, October 14th, to select
> papers for the conference program. I'm leaving Stanford on Friday and
> getting back on Sunday.
>
> It might be a possibility to have dinner together on Sunday, if that would
> work for you. In that case I would have to reschedule my flight to land
> in SFO earlier than I'm currently scheduled to land.
>
> Would dinner on Sunday work for you? Any chance we can meet Monday for
> lunch?
>
> I look forward to seeing you.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Nick
>
> Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > Nick,
> >
> > I shall be in Stanford Oct 14 - 15, visiting my family.
> > I would be glad to meet you (and possibly Giuseppe - your call) for
> lunch.
> > Please, let mer know if you are free on one of these days. Saturday would
> > work better for me.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> > Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu> on 09/21/2000 02:09:46 PM
> >
> > To:   Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
> > cc:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > Subject:  Re: Enron/Stanford Program
> >
> > Stinson,
> >
> > Great! I'm looking forward to a very productive collaboration.
> > I'll immediately start doing Giuseppe's papers, for him to work
> > on the Enron/Stanford program.
> >
> > Many Thanks to you and Vince, and I hope to see you soon at Stanford
> > or Enron. If I remember correctly, Vince is visiting Stanford in
> > October.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > Stinson.Gibner@enron.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Nick,
> > >
> > > I spoke with Paul Racicot, head of trading for  EBS, North America this
> > > morning.   He said that he is happy to send the $100,000 for your
> program
> > > from his budget.   I have forwarded to him the draft letter to
> accompany
> > > the funds and will try to follow up to make sure that the money is sent
> > > promptly.
> > >
> > > --Stinson


Greg, I received the list of players on the PG&E side today from Glynn's
office.  I called Mark Haedicke to give him the rundown, and he feels
comfortable with you and Jeff attending the meeting alone.  As Jeff will be
arriving in Dallas from San Francisco, you will need to get yourself to
Dallas; however, we will add your name to the manifest for the return to
Houston unless we hear otherwise from you.

Below are the details as we know them now:

Date:  Friday, June 22
Time:  12:30 p.m.-2:30 p.m.
Location: 100 Crescent Court, 6th Floor (Wasserstein's offices), Dallas
PG&E players: Bob Glynn, Chairman & CEO, PG&E Corp.
  Gordon Smith, President & CEO, PG&E utility
  Fong Wan, VP, Risk Initiatives, PG&E Corp.
  Ken Beckfire, Wasserstein
  Joe Sauvage, Investment Advisor, Lehman Bros.
ENE players: Jeff Skilling
  Greg Whalley

As new details become available, we'll pass them to you right away.  SRS


I believe it is timely to discuss this again and I agree with Cynthia that
stand alone legislation does nothing to address the essential transmission
structural issues.

I am open minded on the issue if someone can make a compelling case to
support stand alone legislation, BUT my gut reaction is that it would be  a
serious mistake.  Congress would happily put off dealing with this issue for
years if it passes reliability only legislation.  I think the legislation
itself makes little or no progress on our issues and may even set us back on
making progress at FERC and in other fora.

I realize that if this gets going it may be hard to stop, but it would be
such a cynically ineffective approach to the real reliability problems that
we should help whomever we can to put a stop to it.  If it gets through
committee, I have no confidence in this Congress to actually amend it into
something better and broader, so, again, I have difficulty seeing why we
should go that route.

I look forward to the discussion.

Cynthia Sandherr@ENRON
07/17/2000 02:20 PM

To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
I
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES,
dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, cingebretson@bracepatt.com, Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, ed@buckham.com, Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Stand-alone Reliability Legislation

Joe:  thanks.  Allison is arranging a brief (thirty minutes) Conference Call
for sometime tomorrow  so we can assure that we are all on the same page on
this issue.  Although we had supported the policy agreement, we had been on
record to oppose for political reasons the bill's movement on a stand-alone
basis since policing the grid does nothing to address the essential
transmission structural changes the market is crying to have addressed in
order to provide reliability.  However, given Jeff Brown's efforts, the
political need for inoculation and other political developments, it is timely
to once again discuss Enron's position.  I look forward to our call sometime
tomorrow. Cynthia

Joe Hartsoe
07/17/2000 03:09 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Stand-alone Reliability Legislation

FYI.  Thoughts?  JOE
---------------------- Forwarded by Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron on 07/17/2000
03:01 PM ---------------------------

janderson <janderson@elcon.org> on 07/17/2000 12:34:47 PM
To: jhartso@enron.com
cc: myacker@elcon.org, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com

Subject: Stand-alone Reliability Legislation

Joe,

It is my understanding that you were on the call for a short time this
morning of the group dealing with reliability language.  The discussion
covered the chances of stand-alone reliability legislation.

Where do you stand on this issue?

As you are aware, ELCON has been opposed to any kind of stand-alone
legislation -- including reliability.  At first, we were not strongly
opposed to the stand-alone reliability piece.  However, we have become more
opposed as time has passed and we have seen how the vertically-integrated
recalcitrant utilities have been able dominate NERC and stifle any
progressive market-oriented movement.  We think things would be as bad --
if not worse -- with the stand-alone creation of NAERO.  The establishment
of NAERO -- alone -- would not be good for the development of markets.

Given this, we are concerned about how things are going.  However, we
aren't doing much on our own since we would be very ineffective.  We are
open to ideas.

John


The trade confirmation for your order(s) is now available online at etrade.com(sm).
Use the URL(s) below to view (customer log on required).

The information contained in this confirmation shall be binding upon you if you do not object,
either in writing or via electronic mail, within two (2) days after the confirmation is first received by you.

Document ID: 20010526022037065780074268
https://trading.etrade.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/applogic+accttaxbridge?page=CONFIRM&cmd=display&doctype=cnf&document_id=20010526022037065780074268


Please add Lisa Bills, Chris Herron and Mitch Robinson.  You have Lisa's info
on the GE list.

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 08:42 AM ---------------------------

Pamela Vande Krol Castro <castro@rice.edu> on 04/17/2001 12:46:56 PM
To:	Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com (Vince Kaminski)
cc:
Subject:	MGMT 656

Enclosed please find the final grade rosters for MGMT 656.  Grades are due into our office no later than Friday, May 4.

Remember that this is the university deadline for graduating students.

Thank you for your help! - Pam (713-348-6223)
 - 656.doc


_________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY

FOR

1/4/2002 5:00:00 PM through 1/7/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS:

Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 1:00:00 PM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 PM London
Outage: SysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Split for Netco/Estate
Environments Impacted: The outage the sysAdmiral Application will be brief and should not directly affect any applications.
Purpose: We are Splitting the sysAdmiral Fault Tolerance Databases and Master Services on NAHOU-BPMS01P and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P. NAHOU-BPMS01P Database/Master will be used for Estate Scheduling needs and NAHOU-BPMSFT01P will be used for Netco Scheduling Needs. After the environments are split their will be no more replication between the two servers or Fault Tolerance.
Backout: ReEnable Fault Tolernace.
Contact(s): Brennan, Ryan 713-853-4545
Lindsay, Brian 713-853-6225
Impact: Corp
Time: Sat 1/5/2002 9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 1/5/2002 9:30:00 AM CT
Sat 1/5/2002 7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 1/5/2002 7:30:00 AM PT
Sat 1/5/2002 3:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/5/2002 3:30:00 PM London
Outage: Hardware swap for DFS NAHOU
Environments Impacted: All
Purpose: Existing DFS cluster NAHOU hardware has been marked for Netco Deployment. Therefore it is necessary to de-commission NAHOU and bring up another instance of NAHOU dfs for estate.
Backout: Revert DFS cluster back to NAHOU.
Contact(s): Cheng, John 7138531672
McNair, Darren 7138537955

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI:  No Scheduled Outages

EES: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


-----Original Message-----
From: Forster, Avril
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Cc: Wales, Stacey
Subject: ForestWeb Article

DATE: 	08/29/2001 21:23:34
SOURCE: 	Forestweb
HEADLINE: 	Deferiet Paper mill in N.Y. to be reopened by new B.C. owner
ARTICLE: 	By James McLaren

SAN FRANCISCO, Aug. 29, 2001 (Forestweb) -- Vancouver, B.C.-based Belkorp Industries Inc. has acquired the Deferiet Paper Co. mill in Upstate New York from bankruptcy court. A Belkorp official declined comment today until the transaction is completed.

The new owner plans to reopen to idled mill to produce paper, either from existing wood pulp operations or recycled paper, according to local press reports.

The deal comes four months after the mill closed down, and one month after an auction failed to produce any bids.

The independent mill was formerly operated by Champion International. It has listed capacity of 225,000 tons annually of groundwood specialty paper.

Belkorp plans to re-open the mill by next spring, and rehire between 100 and 200 workers, local press reports said. It previously employed more than 400.

The news came after weeks of efforts to jointly market the Deferiet mill with other Upstate closed mills in Lyons Falls, N.Y., and Newton Falls, N.Y.

Unemployment benefits were to run out soon for the former Deferiet Paper workers, who are members of the Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers International Union.

See previous story:

New York: piecemeal auction marks end of Deferiet paper mill (07/18) - The Post-Star (Glens Falls, N.Y.) <http://www.forestweb.com/taf/news.taf?_function=detail&_archives=1&Layout1_uid1=11579&ddart=1&_UserReference=A3A9F06599E2A5F43B8DB458>

powered by Forestweb <http://www.forestweb.com/>


i think you just lucked out for now.....when they hear enron gets out without
a scratch
they will expand their definition to include you, too.

D

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

> glad we're not a generator.
>
> best,
> jeff
>
>
>                     Dorothy
>                     Rothrock             To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>                     <drothrock@cm        cc:
>                     ta.net>              Subject:     Re: Sher Shops
Alternative Edison
>                                          Bailout Plan
>                     07/11/2001
>                     12:45 PM
>
>
>
> worse for SCE and generators, who have to eat the small guy share of the
> undercollection
> between them. No transmission sale.
>
> D
>
> Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
>
> > better or worse than ours?
> >
> >
> >                     Dorothy
> >                     Rothrock             To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> >                     <drothrock@cm        cc:
> >                     ta.net>              Subject:     Re: Sher Shops
> Alternative Edison
> >                                          Bailout Plan
> >                     07/11/2001
> >                     12:20 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > let me know if delaney doesn't send to you...
> >
> > d
> >
> > Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks.  415.782.7854.  Better or worse than ours?
> > >
> > >
> > >                     Dorothy
> > >                     Rothrock             To:
> Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> > >                     <drothrock@cm        cc:     Ann.Cohn@sce.com,
> > "'Barbara Barkovich
> > >                     ta.net>              (E-mail)'"
> > <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "Dominic
> > >                                          DiMare (E-mail)"
> > <dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>,
> > >                     07/11/2001           "'John Fielder (E-mail)'"
> > <fieldejr@sce.com>,
> > >                     11:54 AM             "'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'"
> > <isenberg@hmot.com>,
> > >                                          "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
> > <jdasovic@enron.com>,
> > >                                          "'Keith McCrea (E-mail)'"
> > <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
> > >                                          "'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'"
> > <lys@a-klaw.com>,
> > >                                          "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'"
> > <lysherif@yahoo.com>,
> > >                                          "'Gary Schoonyan (E-mail)'"
> > <schoongl@sce.com>,
> > >                                          "'John White (E-mail)'"
> > <vjw@cleanpower.org>,
> > >                                          dhunter@s-k-w.com,
> > Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov
> > >                                          Subject:     Re: Sher Shops
> > Alternative Edison
> > >                                          Bailout Plan
> > >
> > >
> > > I have the plan.....who wants it? send your fax number (and $10 for
> > > shipping
> > > and handling....just kidding)
> > >
> > > D
> > >
> > > Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > Folks:  Please see highlighted sections.  Anyone seen Byron's plan?
> > Know
> > > > where it's headed, etc.?
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > *************************************************************************
> > > > Power purchase bills exceed $7.5 billion
> > > >
> > > > Published Tuesday, July 10, 2001, in the San Jose Mercury News
> > > > BY MARK GLADSTONE, NOAM LEVEY AND DION NISSENBAUM
> > > >
> > > > Mercury News Sacramento Bureau
> > > >
> > > > SACRAMENTO -- Six months after jumping into the electricity business,
> > the
> > > > Davis administration on Monday provided the first detailed glimpse of
> > > > California's daily power purchases, showing more than $5 billion in
> > > > payments, much of it to government-owned utilities and private
> > companies
> > > > that state officials have branded as price gougers.
> > > >
> > > > The state spent an additional $2.5 billion on a variety of contracts
> > and
> > > > other electricity services designed to stabilize the volatile energy
> > > > markets, according to documents that the state agreed to release last
> > > week
> > > > amid a legal dispute over public access to the data.
> > > >
> > > > In roughly the first five months of the year, the state shelled out
> > $1.2
> > > > billion to Atlanta-based Mirant, the most any company was paid for
> > > > electricity, followed by $1 billion to Powerex, the marketing arm of
> BC
> > > > Hydro in British Columbia. It also paid $331 million to the Los
> Angeles
> > > > Department of Water and Power.
> > > >
> > > > The documents raise questions about some of the common assumptions
> that
> > > > have arisen around the electricity crisis. For instance, almost 40
> > > percent
> > > > of the state's purchases have come from government-run power
> generators
> > > in
> > > > California and elsewhere, but not Texas; some of the biggest
> suppliers
> > > are
> > > > from the Northwest.
> > > >
> > > > Gov. Gray Davis, who has ambitions to run for the White House, has
> put
> > > much
> > > > of the blame for the soaring costs of power on energy companies based
> > in
> > > > President Bush's home state.
> > > >
> > > > The figures are tucked inside 1,770 of pages of invoices that Davis
> has
> > > > resisted divulging, saying disclosure would encourage suppliers to
> > charge
> > > > more. The state, which last month released information on its
> long-term
> > > > electricity contracts worth $43 billion, agreed Thursday to release
> the
> > > > first quarter details.
> > > >
> > > > Short on explanation
> > > >
> > > > The figures were disclosed late Monday by the California Department
> of
> > > > Water Resources, which buys power for the state's financially
> strapped
> > > > major utilities, and seem to buttress the administration's contention
> > > that
> > > > the price of power is gradually dropping but offer little or no
> > > explanation
> > > > for what prompted the decrease.
> > > >
> > > > In January, for instance, the average price for power on the spot
> > market
> > > > was $321 a megawatt hour. It peaked in April at $332 and dropped to
> > $271
> > > in
> > > > May.
> > > >
> > > > One megawatt powers about 750 homes.
> > > >
> > > > Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said the price data supports the
> > > governor's
> > > > assertions that California has been gouged. ``The bad guys are
> clearly
> > > the
> > > > out-of-state generators,'' Maviglio said. ``There has been a
> > significant
> > > > shift of money out of California.''
> > > >
> > > > But the documents fail to shed much light on whether, as the
> > > administration
> > > > contends, the price drop was due to long-term power contracts
> > negotiated
> > > by
> > > > the state earlier this year. Critics contend that the Davis
> > > administration
> > > > panicked and rushed into deals that commit the state to pay high
> prices
> > > for
> > > > many years.
> > > >
> > > > Used for support
> > > >
> > > > Republican officials used the price information to bolster their
> > attacks
> > > > against Davis, a Democrat, for signing long-term contracts with power
> > > > generators even as the price of power on the spot market was coming
> > down,
> > > > partly because of the declining price of natural gas used to fuel
> many
> > > > plants.
> > > >
> > > > ``It's more clear than ever that the long-term contracts are a bad
> > > deal,''
> > > > said Assemblyman Tony Strickland, R-Camarillo. ``The governor's
> really
> > > hurt
> > > > the ratepayers for the next five or 10 years.''
> > > >
> > > > The newly released bills highlight the volatility of California's
> > energy
> > > > market, where the price per megawatt hour ranged from $70 to $1,000.
> On
> > > any
> > > > given day, the records show, the prices from seller to seller varied
> > > > widely, with some of the highest prices being charged by public
> > utilities
> > > > and companies outside Texas.
> > > >
> > > > On one day in February, for example, San Diego-based Sempra Energy
> was
> > > > charging $165 per megawatt hour, the Eugene Water and Electric Board
> > was
> > > > charging nearly $500 and Duke Energy, a North Carolina company, was
> > > > charging up to $575.
> > > >
> > > > The state's daily spending peaked May 10 at $102.4 million for all
> > power,
> > > > including the spot market and contracted power.
> > > >
> > > > The state began buying power in mid-January on behalf of the state's
> > > major
> > > > utilities, which were unable to borrow money to buy power after
> > amassing
> > > > enormous debts for electricity.
> > > >
> > > > San Jose-based Calpine Corp., which is building several new power
> > plants
> > > > around California including one in South San Jose, did only $29
> million
> > > > worth of business with the state in the first five months of the
> year,
> > > > according to the figures.
> > > >
> > > > The state began buying power in mid-January when Pacific Gas &
> Electric
> > > Co.
> > > > and Southern California Edison Co. were on the ropes financially.
> PG&E
> > > > later went into bankruptcy.
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, state lawmakers took another shot at trying to cobble
> > together
> > > a
> > > > plan to rescue financially ailing Edison.
> > > >
> > > > While most concede that a rescue plan Davis worked out with Edison
> will
> > > not
> > > > win the necessary support in the Legislature, lawmakers have created
> > > > several working groups to come up with alternatives.
> > > >
> > > > Compromise plan
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, state Sen. Byron Sher, D-Redwood City, unveiled the latest
> > > > compromise proposal that seeks to protect average ratepayers and
> small
> > > > businesses from further rate increases and forces everyone else to
> help
> > > > finance the Edison bailout.
> > > >
> > > > The ``shared pain'' proposal would force power producers, owed about
> $1
> > > > billion, to take a 30 percent ``haircut'' and agree to forgive about
> > $300
> > > > million in Edison debts. Edison would be asked to swallow $1.2
> billion
> > --
> > > > about a third of its debt. And big users would be asked to pay off
> the
> > > > remaining $2 billion in debts, possibly by paying higher prices for
> > > power.
> > > >
> > > > In exchange, large companies would be given the opportunity to buy
> > power
> > > on
> > > > the open market, a system that would allow many of them to sign cheap
> > > > energy deals.
> > > >
> > > > Sher presented the proposal to Senate Democrats Monday afternoon, but
> > it
> > > > remains unclear how much support the framework will receive in the
> > > > Legislature.
> > > >
> > > > Contact Mark Gladstone at mgladstone@sjmercury.com or (916) 325-4314.


Start Date: 10/29/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102908.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/29/01
  TRADING_SC: EPPS
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Shirley,

OK.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
12:02 PM ---------------------------

Alex Huang@ENRON
01/07/2000 08:28 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New PC

Hi Shirley,
I would like to request for a new PC.  My current PC is quite old with not
enough memory.  Twice
I ran out of memory and had to have IT people coming to clean it for me.
Their suggestion is
to either get a new hard drive or a new PC.  Given that Dell has Pentiumc III
Processor at 800 MHz
on market, I would like to request a PC with process at 500 MHz or higher
level.
Thank you very much.

Best,
Alex


I have a conference call that starts around 1030 and is scheduled to go to
1230.  Otherwise, no lunch plans.

Kay

From: Carlos Sole@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/20/2000 08:49 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Organizational Changes

Do you have lunch plans?


you have already won.  check schedule.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baumbach, David
Sent:	Monday, December 03, 2001 8:47 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:

I can't believe Rich Gannon had another huge game against me.  I better not lose!

Mean Machine


We have received the following executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency - Cross Border)

Effective Date:   June 2, 1999

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Aries Resources, L.L.C.

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products except:   pulp and paper and
foreign exchange

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490


Linda,
 I am looking for the follow-up assignment.  I remember having it prepared
and signed when the AEP people were looking at the contracts across the
street.  The reason it was assigned back to ENA was that it needed to reside
in ENA through July 1999.  Thereafter it could be assigned to HPL.  If I
don't find the copy, everything got scuffled in the move, I will reassign
effective as of August 1, 1999.  Is this acceptable?

	Linda S Bryan
	01/29/2001 04:31 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cathy L Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amelia
Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Union Carbide Corporation, 96002201

Dan,

This contract was assigned to HPLC effective 5/1/00 and reassigned to ENA on
the same date.  The reassignment included a note from you dated 5/23/00
stating  "the Union Carbide contract has been assigned in error and is
reassigned to ENA because that contract was included in one of the prior ECT
monetizations".  This contract is included on the Exhibit A of the assignment
back to ENA.

 Is there another assignment reassigning the contract back to HPLC from ENA?

Please adivse.

Thanks,

Linda

	From:  Amelia Alland                           01/29/2001 09:47 AM

To: Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy L Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Union Carbide Corporation, 96002201

An issue has come to light regarding this contract.  HPL has received an
amendment to contract 96002201 between HPL and Union wherein it refers to an
assignment between EING and HPL.   Our clerk, Cathy Harris, spoke to Dan Hyvl
concerning the Enron entity name discrepancy and obtained a copy of the
assignment effective 5/1/00 which includes Union Carbide as a contract to be
assigned.  The contract was evidently not assigned on the 5/1/00 date.
Please have someone in your group make this correction and let me know when
the correction is completed so that we can process the amendment timely.
aa


this is funny
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000
01:51 PM ---------------------------
To: Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Chad
Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: cop shock

 - FingerPig.avi


Then I guess we can safely say that Jeff is in la-la land.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:52 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout Con't

Yes they are two totally different electronic trading systems.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:43 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout Con't

This deal was done on the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE). Jeff thought it
was the same thing as Dynegy Direct. I've changed it to ICE as broker, but
I'm wondering if these are different brokers, or why Jeff would have thought
they were the same....???

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:31 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/13 Checkout Con't

deal 548465
Jeff Richter

Is Dynegy Direct the correct broker because I do not see this deal on their
web checkout?


All -
Just a short note to let you know that the resolution authorizing equity
derivative trades was passed by the board last week.  Jim Armogida just
confirmed this to me.  So, moving forward, Enron Corp (not ENA) should be the
counterparty in all of our trades.  As a result, we should move forward with
negotiating an ISDA with Lehman and others ASAP.
CF


Here is the Opinion Elite Survey Summary, with Enron mentions removed.  Use
as you see fit.

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2001 03:27 PM -----

	"Nicole Fink" <nicole@pos.org>
	04/27/2001 02:40 PM

		 To: dlugar@quinngillespie.com
		 cc: mpalmer@enron.com
		 Subject: Enron Summary

David/Mark,

Per your request, attached is a summary minus the references to
Enron.  Please let me know if you need anything else.  I will be in
the office for about 5 more minutes and then will be leaving for the
weekend.  Thanks.

The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

   ---- File information -----------
     File:  execsummary no enron.wpd
     Date:  27 Apr 2001, 15:25
     Size:  181514 bytes.
     Type:  WordPerfect

 - execsummary no enron.wpd
The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

   ---- File information -----------
     File:  enron.PDF
     Date:  27 Apr 2001, 15:39
     Size:  48331 bytes.
     Type:  Unknown

 - enron.PDF


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
05/11/99 04:06 PM ---------------------------

Don Black
05/11/99 06:42 PM
To: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders@ECT,
Greg Whalley@ECT, Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Duke claim against Enron

Although no formal notice has been rec'd from Duke, They have informed me
verbally that they do not intend to proceed with any claims against us.  If
you need any details please call me in BA or send me an email with your
contact instructions.  Given the nature of this topic I would prefer to
discuss my thoughts on the subject in person, if necessary.  Thanks for
everyone's help, and I apologise for any inconvenience.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/26/2001 06:18 PM -----

	Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/26/2001 12:31 PM

		 To: Ban Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim
Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Andrews/ENRON@enronXgate, Jennifer
Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Here are the latest stranded cost numbers.

This analysis is based on internal curves.  Please do not release without
approval from Belden or S. Kean.  We will try to redo the analysis using
public forward curve numbers but in the mean time ...

The biggest refinement is that I made an adjustment for the fact that many
contracts are gas indexed and their price falls.  Both gas and electricity
have fallen since DWR released their numbers in late May.  I was able to
replicate the total contract cost of $41 billion, which gives me some
confidence in the approximations I have made.

The bottom line numbers are out at columns AB to AF

Executed only, undiscounted and discounted ($million)
 8,098      6,456
Executed and Agreement In Principal, undiscounted and discounted ($million)
 13,840     10,639

In otherwords, the $20 billion number I quoted earlier is down to $13.8
billion due to the adjustment for gas costs.

Comments welcome.