Dana,

I was looking through some outstanding items on my desk and found this.

AP is still waiting on you to provide wiring information for the Price
Waterhouse invoice.  Company 0988 does not have the ability to process a
check.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Carolyn

	From:  Dana Davis @ ECT                           09/26/2000 02:13 PM

To: Carolyn Centilli/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re-issue payment request

These are the request that can be paid out of Co. 0988...

Vendor    Vendor #  Amount

Price Waterhouse Coopers  5700001243  $4856.00 - Canadian $   and/or
$3284.70 (June)
Standard Life Tower      8/11/2000
639 5th Avenue SW
Suite 2100
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Blake, Cassels & Graydon, LLP  5700000182  $2026.13  - US $(7/12/2000)
855 - 2nd Street SW      $827.06    - Canadian $ (7/12/2000)
East Tower, Bankers Hall     $861.59    - US $8/11/2000)
Suite 3500
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This one below needs to be paid out of Co. 0958...

Gardere Wynne Sewell & Riggs, LLP 5000027956  $5027.75  - US$ (8/11/2000)
1000 Louisiana, Suite 3400
Houston , TX 77002

We also will send/fax the pmt request if necessary.  Thanks again for your
help.

ddavis


The attached file is an updated version of the one that I sent a few minutes
ago of the same name.   The changes are minor and are as follows:

*In the Daily Chg worksheet, the intraday change on BGE of +303 is all on
Choice+DCQ.  The original had 40 dth of the increase on Choice +DCQ and the
remaining 263 on EU 164, which was not correct.  No changes were made to the
volumes in the Total Reqs. worksheet which were correct in the original
version.

Sorry for any inconvenience.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 04-12-00 Daily VolsAM.xls


Can you execute this calp
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	tco_commercial_services@nisource.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 10:15 AM
To:	cfrankl2@enron.com; Collins, Joann; Loocke, Kelly; Allwein, Robert; Goodell, Scott; Loving, Scott; Gillespie, Steve; Lamadrid, Victor; Germany, Chris
Subject:	Columbia Contract Awaiting Your Execution

You have an electronic contract awaiting your review and execution.  Use the Execute Electronic Contracts screen to print and electronically execute a Request(s) for service

To Print/Execute Electronic Contracts:

1. Click on the Contracts folder
2. Select the Execute Electronic K from the Contract Administration Drop Down menu
3. Select the service requester from the Service Requester drop down menu
4. Choose the print option of either View Later or E-mail.
 4a. If View Later is selected then the contract can be printed from the Utility
     folder: View Report Selection
 4b. If Email is selected then the contract will be emailed to the address
     displayed in the Email Address Field. This field will default to the email
     address currently associated with the Navigator Id that is currently logged
     on the system. You may change the designation of where the contract is
     to be sent by typing in a different email address
5. Click on Retrieve
6. To print a contract, place a check in the Print Contract select box beside the Bid/Request No. that you want to print
7. To execute your contract, place a check in the Execute select box beside the Bid/Request No. that you want to execute. Note: It is strongly recommended that you print your contract prior to execution. You can select the print option independent of the execution option; that way you may review the printed contract then if the terms were agreeable, return to this screen to execute the contract
8. Click on Submit.
 8a. After the contract is executed the screen will display the contract
     number assigned and the date it was executed
 8b. The executed contract information will be displayed on the screen for one
     full day following the date it was executed

Note only those Navigator Ids with execution authority may electronically execute a contract. The contract must be executed before the "Execute by Date" expires.

This document was created by TCOAPPS  in the DB2P subsystem in job IPAT0100, job number 06687, program AT12000


It would be helpful to have the cases below 50.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ishikawa, Guy
Sent:	Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:11 AM
To:	Lavorato, John
Cc:	Kishkill, Joe; Collonges, Remi; Rosenberg, David M; Wiggs, Brett
Subject:	Petrobr?s MTM Sensitivity

John,

Please, see attached MTM sensitivity for Petrobr?s deal.

Regards,
Guy Ishikawa


Many of you have requested more time in which to submit your nominations for the 2001 Chairman's Award. In response to your requests, the deadline has been extended to Friday, October 12.

Please take this extended opportunity to nominate that special individual who is your everyday hero and a role model who exemplifies Enron's core values of Respect, Integrity, Communication and Excellence.

This award represents how important Enron's core values are to the company. The success of this award program is determined by Enron's most valuable asset, you, the employee. Employees at any level can nominate fellow employees from anywhere within the Enron family - from the top down or the bottom up. All of those employees who have been nominated in the past are eligible to be nominated again this year and there is no limit to the number of nominations you may submit. Simply complete a nomination form and submit it by Friday, October 12, 2001. Forms can be obtained by visiting your intranet site or at home.enron.com and in Houston they are available in the elevator lobbies. In addition, this year we have a new way you can nominate that everyday Enron hero. Simply pick up the phone and dial 713-345-2492, follow the simple and quick instructions and leave your nomination by phone.

The finalists for the award, the Chairman's Roundtable, and the Chairman's Award winner will be honored at Enron's Management Conference in San Antonio on November 15.

Thank you for your participation.


I'm desperate.  HELP!!!!!!  We have a meeting with Duran et al today, and I
really wanted to brouse through this before then.


Great job Dan and Jim

Dan J Hyvl
09/07/2000 08:47 AM
To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Entex Contracts.  FYI

I am in receipt of the fax from George Hepburn which has been signed by Entex
and Unit.
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 08:45 AM -----

	Dan J Hyvl
	09/06/2000 05:49 PM

		 To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Entex Contracts.  FYI

Through the efforts of Jim Ducote, Bruce Coogler and George Hepburn at
Reliant Energy Entex have agreed to waive the confidentiality provisions of
the 3 major purchase/sale contracts that Enron North America Corp has with
Reliant Energy Entex and Unit Gas Transmission Company and thereby permit
such contracts to be included in the data room without redacting.  George
Hepburn indicated that he would sign the waiver tonight and get the signature
of another officer and fax the waiver back to us tomorrow morning.  I will
let you know when we receive the fax.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

January 5, 2001 5:00pm through January 8, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: .
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 1/6/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 1/7/2001 at  3:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 1/7/2001 at  1:00:00 AM PT
 Sun 1/7/2001 at   5:00:00 AM London thru Sun 1/7/2001 at  9:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EDI Hub Memory Upgrade
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: System reaching 80% utilization on peak volume days.  Increased
memory will reduce page swapping which will reduce  CPU utilization.  Some
recorded disk errors.
Backout: Remove memory and restart system.
Contact(s):  Karen O'Grady  5-7149  713-327-4805
  Alex Tudor  3-3895  713-318-1987
  Jack Metkus  3-0362  713-288-0743

EI:
Impact:  EI
Time:  Fri 1/5/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 1/5/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 1/5/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at 12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Move Server - EITXHOU1F05 to Ardmore
Environments Impacted:  El and Azurix
Purpose: Consolidate Security Servers in one location.
Backout: None
Contact(s):  EI Security Admin  713-345-8825

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  ECF
Time:  Wed 1/3/2001 at  9:00:00 AM CT thru Mon 1/15/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Wed 1/3/2001 at  7:00:00 AM PT thru Mon 1/15/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Wed 1/3/2001 at  3:00:00 PM London thru Tue 1/16/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London
Outage:  New Primary Domain for Mont Belvieu
Environments Impacted:  ECF
Purpose: To have a redundancy for Mont Belvieu, if current server goes down
then Mont Belvieu is down until one is rebuilt.
Backout: Put the original 1600 NT server back on line.
Contact(s):  Bill Hill  281.470.4906  713.978.1207

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 1/5/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  4:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 1/5/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  2:00:00 AM PT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  10:00:00 AM London
Outage:  SysAdmiral Upgrade
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: To increase production and development reliablility and stability.
Backout: We will revert back to current version if upgrade is unsuccessful.
Contact(s):  Rusty Cheves     713-345-3798  877-499-0610
  Larry Robinson  713-853-5956  713-284-3554

Impact:  GPG
Time:  Sat 1/6/2001 at  1:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  1:30:00 PM CT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at 11:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  11:30:00 AM PT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at  7:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  7:30:00 PM London
Outage:  Add additional card to CORP-CR1-ARD
Environments Impacted:  GPG
Purpose: Add a redundant connection to the 7500
Backout: Remove card, reboot router
Contact(s):  Vincent Fox  713-853-5337

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:
Impact:  Corp Exchange/Outlook
Time:  Sat 1/6/2001 at  10:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  10:30:00 AM CT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at    8:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 1/6/2001 at     8:30:00 AM PT
 Sat 1/6/2001 at    4:00:00 PM London thru Sat 1/6/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Exchange 2000Failback
Environments Impacted:  Users-Corp Exchange/Outlook
Purpose: Move VS so that Exchange is running on its intended cluster node.
Nahou-msmx03v is currently running on its cluster node partner after the
failover on Wednesday.
Backout: NA
Contact(s):  Scott Albright  713-345-9381

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]


I'm preparing the Master Agreement for execution between Enron Broadband Services Asia/Pacific Pte Ltd. and the referenced counterparty.  Please let me know the date of the earliest outstanding trade (if any) so that I can date my master agreement.

Thanks!

Marie
x33907


please print and put in binder with labels
thanks
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 02/20/2001 03:47 PM -----

	Legal Temp 6
	02/20/2001 03:33 PM

		 To: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Review of Pulp, Paper, Lumber and Steel Documentation

We are in the process of reviewing and upgrading our pulp, paper, lumber and
steel trading contract documentation platforms.

Attached for your review and comments are the draft Master and Sample GTCs
and Confirms for these commodities.

Please forward any comments with specific language changes to me by March
1st.  You are invited to a meeting March 2 at 11: 00 a.m. in EB38C1 to
discuss any proposed changes.

Please forward these templates to any one else in your group who may wish to
review and comment on.


Thanks for the commnets, Lynn.

I've faxed you a copy of "Plan B."

I'll let others chime in, but ideally it seemsthat we'd want to start the
meetings next week and have at least the rough outline of a proposed,
comprehensive solution to put on the table for discussion.  But at a minimum
we'd want to get "the process" nailed down by very early next week.

Best,
Jeff

	Lynn.A.Lednicky@dynegy.com
	05/15/2001 07:34 AM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc: sryan@aesc.com, hoffman@blackstone.com, bbailey@duke-energy.com,
john.harrison@elpaso.com, rachael.king@elpaso.com, clark.smith@elpaso.com,
skean@enron.com, tom.allen@mirant.com, sonnet.edmonds@mirant.com,
randy.harrison@mirant.com, alex.goldberg@williams.com,
Maureen.McVicker@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: Summary of Today's Call/Agenda for Tomorrow's Call

Jeff,

Sorry I was unable to make the call yesterday.  Thanks for the summary.  My
comments and questions are indicated below.

Please fax a copy of Plan B to be at 713 767 6677.

     You suggest starting the "process" in Sacramento next week.  I'm not
     sure exactly what this means.  Are we saying we will have a proposal
     or that we will be advocating a process/forum to get all the right
     parties at the table?
     Did we set a time for the next call on Friday?
     With regard to the Issues list, here are a few extra items:
          need to make clear that real price signals should be sent to all
          sectors (not just those that wouldn't vote for Davis anyway) as
          soon as possible
          I cannot imagine a situation in which the IOUs are returned to
          financial stability within 3-6 months; my guess is that it will
          be at least a year
          if IOUs are returned to the procurement role, we need to make
          sure that they have the appropriate risk management tools
          (ability to enter forward contracts, options, etc.)
          if IOUs are returned to the procurement role, we also need to
          have assurances that the situation we have today won't happen
          again;  for example, if the state assigns the CDWR contracts to
          the IOUs and three years from now the market price is less than
          the contract price, what assurances does anyone have that the PUC
          will not try to make the IOUs absorb the difference
          If we want to go to a core/non-core approach, why do we need to
          wait 18-24 months;  it seems to me that we could start that
          process now
          As for legal claims and investigations, we need to make clear
          that we want to resolve all state and federal claims;  the civil
          claims present a different set of challenges for resolution
          as for discounts on receivables, I'm not ready to commit one way
          or another; however, if there are discounts they must apply to
          all market participants - not just the ones that Davis can get to
          the table.

Lynn

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com on 05/14/2001 08:47:31 PM

To:   sryan@aesc.com, hoffman@blackstone.com, bbailey@duke-energy.com,
      Lynn.A.Lednicky@Dynegy.com, john.harrison@elpaso.com,
      rachael.king@elpaso.com, clark.smith@elpaso.com, skean@enron.com,
      tom.allen@mirant.com, sonnet.edmonds@mirant.com,
      randy.harrison@mirant.com, alex.goldberg@williams.com
cc:   Maureen.McVicker@enron.com

Subject:  Summary of Today's Call/Agenda for Tomorrow's Call

Greetings:
n order to keep everyone in the loop, the folks on today's call wanted to
send out a brief summary of the call for the benefit of those who couldn't
make it.  Apologies for any omissions, inaccuracies, etc.  Others who were
on the call please chime in if I've gotten anything wrong, or missed
anything.

Best,
Jeff

SUMMARY
   Enron, Duke, El Paso and Williams were on the call, as was Michael
   Hoffman of the Blackstone Group (the Governor's financial advisors).
   On the subject of how the group would organize itself, it was agreed
   that the calls would be open to anyone who wanted to participate.
   A smaller group consisting of Duke, El Paso, Enron, and Williams would
   take the lead on walking the halls of Sacramento, meeting with policy
   makers, and advocating whatever plan the group develops.
   Folks agreed that achieving a comprehesive solution requires a tangible
   process; that is, the principals need to get in a room, face to face,
   for however long it takes to work out a resolution.
   It was agreed that the process should start no later than the beginning
   of next week, and that it should take place in Sacramento.
   It was decided that the Legislature and the Attorney General needed to
   be brought into the process as soon as possible, i.e., next week.
   There was some discussion regarding the release today of "Plan B."  Plan
   B is a plan proposed by Democratic and Republican legislators as an
   alternative to the MOU that the Governor struck with Edison.  After that
   call I received a copy of "Plan B."  If you'd like a copy please send me
   your fax number.
   Folks on the call agreed to have the next "supplier-only" call-in
   meeting on Friday.
   Finally, Michael Hoffman said that they are hoping to have a "ratings
   agency level" presentation prepared by the end of the week.  The goal of
   the presentation is to reassure capital markets that the bonds the state
   seeks to issue are solidly backed by retail rates.

The Agenda for Tomorrow's Call with the Governor's Staff
Item #1:       The Credit Issue
   Michael Hoffman said that the Governor's office wants to start
   tomorrow's meeting discussing the creditworthiness issue.
   Hoffman said that the Governor's folks are hoping to have completed by
   the start of tomorrow's meeting a draft of an agreement between the
   California PUC and CDWR.  The agreement is designed to ensure that DWR
   gets paid for power services delivered.
   If the draft is ready, they'd like to discuss on the call tomorrow.

Item #2:       Identify the Components of a Comprehensive Solution.
   It was agreed that our group should put on the table at tomorrow's
   meeting the universe of issues that need to be included in a
   comprehensive solution.
   Enron was asked to take a first stab at what those components are.  The
   following is a brief outline, which is not intended to be definitive,
   but a starting point for discussion.
     Utility creditworthiness
        retail rates must reflect costs
     Increase supply
        streamline and otherwise reform the siting process
     Decrease demand
        establish real-time pricing
        implement demand buy-down and other conservation programs
     Create a real market
        Remove the State from the power-buying business as soon as possible
        (e.g., once new rates are in place and utilities are returned to
        creditworthiness; approximately 3-6 months)
        Return the procurement role to the utilities
        Reinstate Direct Access immediately for all customers
        Within 18-24 months, create a "core/noncore" market structure for
        electricity, similar to California's market structure for natural
        gas
     Keep the industry in the hands of the private sector
        Reject proposals calling on the State to take over transmission,
        generation, etc.
     Resolve outstanding legal claims, investigations, etc.
        Resolution requires certainty and prompt payment (understanding
        that discounts on receivables is on the table for discussion)


The "safe harbor" date should be Feb.1.  However, coordinate with Jeff P
before you do anything.  Jan 31 is the date per our contract with CES as to
closing of the legal transition.

12/12/2000 01:46 PM
Jeffrey Porter
Jeffrey Porter
Jeffrey Porter
12/12/2000 01:46 PM
12/12/2000 01:46 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy L Ray/HOU/EES@EES, Michael H
Garred/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT
Subject: Re: CES and CEM

CES and CEM will still exist for awhile, maybe forever due to legal issues. I
wouldn't begin canceling anything as the Choice customers are still in CES's
name and we don't want any capacity returning or other problems. They should
begin to be transferred to NPC soon. Why don't you hold off for now. Larry
Friedeman (419/878-4760) is actually the last CES employee and can be reached
in his Toledo office through 3/31/01.

Chris Germany@ECT
12/12/2000 01:32 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy L Ray/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Michael H Garred/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CES and CEM

I believe ENA is still agent for Columbia Energy Services and Columbia Energy
Marketing on several pipelines.  Rich Contos's (the only CES person I know)
last day is this Friday.  I left Rich a voicemail asking him if CES/CEM
should continue to exist as a legal entity on the pipelines.

As ENA, I believe I sould at least begin terminating the agency (and
liability) relationships.

Comments/questions??


Is it Marketings plan to offer this as a Primary Firm point or an Alternate.

ds
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Monday, March 04, 2002 9:22 AM
To:	Kowalke, Terry; Corman, Shelley; Betancourt, Ramona
Subject:	FW: Draft - SoCal/Topock Announcement

I'm asking Ramona a question - it would probably be good if I had her on the address list =)

Also, Terry & Shelley - any comments?  We were discussing this in a meeting Friday afternoon and after I incorporate all of our comments, we're going to run it past SoCal as well.  This change is pursuant to a conversation Steve had with Ladd Lorenz last week.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy
Sent:	Friday, March 01, 2002 3:16 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul; Kilmer III, Robert; Harris, Steven
Subject:	Draft - SoCal/Topock Announcement

Here's a simple first draft.  I didn't know how much detail we should get into.

Ramona, am I using the correct terminology?  They are not going to confirm in Cycle 1.  They are just going to let us fill-in where El Paso filled-up all the capacity downstream.

 << File: SoCal-TopockScheduling.doc >>

Let me know your comments.

Thanks!


I am in!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gregory, Paul
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 8:25 AM
To:	Alonso, Mario; Bennett, Joel; Bennett, Peter; Brent, Jason; Cangucu, Andre; Cross, Richard; Esbona, Jorge; Garza, Ernesto; Giannone, Adam; Gregory, Paul; James, Matthew; Jens, Felipe; Melinchon, Ermes; Monroy, Gabriel; Pearce, Barry; Poulson, Marc; Rostant, Justin; Servat, Russell; Sunar, Alper; Taylor, Michael E; Velez, Luis
Subject:	last game

We are scheduled to play our last game tomorrow night.
The 1st vs 2nd, 3rd vs 4th, etc. teams play each other.
We are playing the 6th place team.
If we win, we could finish in 4th; if we lose, we would finish in 6th.

Let me know by this afternoon if you can play tomorrow.

Time: 8.45 pm
Place: Cullen Park, Field A
Opponent: Entrix (we beat them 2-0 during the regular season)

Please be at the field a little early so that we can organize.
Please bring your jerseys to the game.

Call 281 398 2229 tomorrow after 4.30 pm to make sure the game is still on (weather-related).


Attached is the form of amend for the Texaco guaranty wrt Superior Natural
Gas.


I don't have a place to stay.  Remember, Sat is my birthday, yeah.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tara Strawser <tstraws@qwest.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Dean, Clint
Subject:	Re:

What??  You're not coming in on Friday???  Lori, Jeff and I get in around 4 on
Friday.  Brenda is driving in around 3 on Friday too.  And yes, my man is
coming with me.  He actually found out that a fraternity brother of his from
San Francisco is flying in for the game.  It is going to be so fun!!  I am
psyched.  Julie called yesterday and was so excited.  You have to come on
Friday night.  That will be the best night!!

Tara

Clint.Dean@enron.com wrote:

> I think I'm driving in on Saturday morning, and staying with Bryan and
> Monica.  When are you getting to Austin?  Is your man coming with you?
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:     Tara Strawser <tstraws@qwest.com>@ENRON
> Sent:     Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:22 PM
> To:       Dean, Clint
> Subject:  Re:
>
> I don't know details.  What are your plans?  Any thoughts??  Julie and I
> talked
> about maybe going to Hula Hut or Trudy's (for Mexican Martini's) Friday.
> Any
> suggestions?  Have you figured out what you are doing about this weekend?
>
> Tara
>
> Clint.Dean@enron.com wrote:
>
> > No crap, me too.  Can you be more specific?
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:     Tara Strawser <tstraws@qwest.com>@ENRON
> > Sent:     Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:13 PM
> > To:       Dean, Clint
> > Subject:  Re:
> >
> > Going to Austin!!  Why?
> >
> > Tara
> >
> > "Dean, Clint" wrote:
> >
> > > Hey, what are your plans for this weekend?
> > >
> > > **********************************************************************
> > > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate
> > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> > the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> by
> > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> > reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete
> > all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> not
> > intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
> a
> > binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> > affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
> > relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
> > Thank you.
> > > **********************************************************************
> >
> >  - tstraws.vcf << File: tstraws.vcf >>
>
>  - tstraws.vcf << File: tstraws.vcf >>

 - tstraws.vcf << File: tstraws.vcf >>


I would be happy to meet with him.

From: Rob Walls on 12/06/2000 06:41 PM
To: James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:

What do you think?

----- Forwarded by Rob Walls/NA/Enron on 12/06/2000 06:41 PM -----

	Christopher Allegaert <callegaert@abv.com>
	12/06/2000 01:30 PM

		 To: rob.walls@enron.com
		 cc: JW1000mac@yahoo.com (Jim McCartney, Esq.)
		 Subject:

Dear Rob:

   I am going to be in Houston on business next week from Wednesday on.  I
wondered if there might be a convenient time to stop in to say hello and if
possible take you up on your offer of an introduction to Jim Derrick.  I
have a series of meetings downtown over the three days.  Any one could
easily be moved.

   Thanks for your help.

   Kindest regards.

                  Chris Allegaert
****************************************************************************
*******
 Christopher Allegaert
Allegaert Berger & Vogel LLP
111 Broadway, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10006
T: (212) 571-0550
F: (212) 571-0555

****************************************************************************
*******
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact
the sender and delete all copies.
****************************************************************************
*******


please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000
02:21 PM ---------------------------

Sunita Katyal@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/25/2000 09:29 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Middle East slide

Gentlemen,

Please find attached the slide on Enron Middle East.

Regards,
Sunita


Please address.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001
07:56 AM ---------------------------

Paul Quilkey@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/01/2001 11:05 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT
cc: egonzales@enron.co.uk
Subject: NWS Meeting - Jan 11 in Dubai

Jeff

Need your input on LNG, particularly email below and requests by VV Rao for
people in this office to be involved in LNG discussions.
Steve Lowe claims the LNG group have booked $5MM off the back off NWS 4th
Train.  Steve claims he was instrumental in "introducing"  Enron LNG people
to the NWS consortium and to BHP wrt the Japan regas proposal.
Would appreciate clarification on operation of the group.
Paul

----- Forwarded by Stephen J Lowe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/01/2001 02:26 PM
-----

	V V Rao@ECT
	02/01/2001 01:02 PM

		 To: Stephen J Lowe/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Dorice Cheong/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: NWS Meeting - Jan 11 in Dubai

Hi Steve:  It was a pleasure to meet you again in Sydney.  You live in a
wonderful city.

The meeting with NWS is now confirmed for Thursday, Jan 11th in Dubai.  I
will be arriving with my colleague Satish Venkataraman on the morning of the
10th so we can have a day of preparation.  I suggest you plan on joining us
so we're all on the same page.  You'll need a visa which takes about 4 days
to process so I think you need to start on it right away.  My assistant
Dorice Cheong can help you with this.  Her number is (65) 838 9010.

I'll call you later this week to discuss the meeting further.

Thanks, vvr


FROM Dr OLOGURU
AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING UNIT.
FOREIGN REMITTANCE DEPT.
UNION TOGOLAISE DU BANQUE
LOME- TOGO.
TEL:00228-911-40-37.

DEAR,
                   (CONFIDETIAL PLEASE)

I am Dr OLOGURU, chief accountant for the bills and
credits in the foreign remittance dept. section of
Union Togolaise Du Banque Lome-Togo in west Africa
with due respect and regard. I have decided to contact
you on a business transaction that will be very
beneficial to both of us at the end of the
transaction.

During our investigation and auditting in this bank,
my
department came across a very huge sum of money
belonging to a deceased person who died on november
1992 in a plane crash and the fund has been dormant in
his account with this Bank without any claim of the
fund in our custody either from his family or relation
before our discovery to this development.

Although personally, I keep this information secret
within myself and partner to enable the whole plans
and idea be Profitable and successful during the time
of execution. The said amount was $6,500,000.00usd(six
million five hundred thousand united states dollars).

As it may interest you to know, I got your impressive
information through my good friends who works with
chamber of commerce on foreign business relations here
in Lome-Togo. It is him who recommended your person
to me to be viable and capable to champion a business
of such magnitude without any problem .

Meanwhile all the whole arrangements to put claim over
this fund as the bonafide next of kin to the deceased,
get the required approval and transfer this money to a
foreign account has been put in place and directives
and needed information will be relayed to you as soon
as you indicate your interest and willingness to
assist us and also benefit your self to this great
business opportunity.

In fact I could have done this deal alone but because
of my position in this country as a civil servant, we
are not allowed to operate a foreign account and would
eventually raise an eye brow on my side during the
time
of transfer because I work in this bank.

This is the actual reason why it will require a second
party or fellow who will forward claims as the next of
kin with affidavit of trust of oath to the Bank and
also present a foreign account where he will need the
money to be re-transferred into, on his request as it
may be after due verification and clarification by the
correspondent branch of the bank where the whole money
will be remitted from to your own designation bank
account.

I will not fail to inform you that this transaction
is 100% risk free. On smooth conclusion of this
transaction, you will be entitled to 30% of the total
sum as gratification, while 10% will be set aside to
take care of expenses that may arise during the time
of transfer and also telephone and fax bills, while
60% will be for me and my partner.

Please, you have been adviced to keep top secret as
we are still in service and intend to retire from
service after we conclude this deal with you. I will
be monitoring the whole situation here in this bank
until you confirm the money in your account. and ask
us
to come down to your country for subsequent sharing
of the fund according to percentage.

previously indicated and further investment, either in
your country or any country you advice us to invest
in. All other necessary information will be sent to
you
when I hear from you. I suggest you get back to me as
soon as possible, stating your wish in this deal.

Yours faithfully,
Dr.OLOGURU
TEL:00228-911-40-37.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
http://auctions.yahoo.com


i will try to find out this weekend when we are jet skiing.


In the April 26 Order regarding the RTO West filing, FERC rejected the
Agreement Limiting Liability, reiterating prior holdings that FERC would
not approve a tariff limiting a transmission provider's liability to its
transmission customers.  The Filing Utilities have filed a request for
rehearing of that rejection.  A copy of the pleading can be found at:
http://www.rtowest.org/Index_Page_RTOWest_FilingUtilities_FERCDocs.htm

    The Filing Utilities attended a technical conference with FERC Staff
on this issue, and there is apparently some receptivity to amending the
order if the Filing Utilities can show there is a difference in
liability exposure between the Order 888 OATT environment and an RTO
environment.
    Please let me know if there is any interest in the IPP/marketer
group submitting comments on the request.

Don


I gave you local admin rights on your laptop yesterday. What you have to do
is to log into the laptop using the local
Machine account. The id and the password is the same as your Corp login now.
The password on the local account will
Never change. If you have a minute today I will show you how. Let me know a
time.

Phillip Randle
Desktop Support Specialist x39665

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:17 PM
To: Randle, Phillip C.
Cc: Kaminski, Vince
Subject: Installation of new programs

Phillip,

How can I install new programs on my laptop, without
the administrator's privileges?

One example: when I travel I use AOL to get access to my mail
and to communicate with the office. Windows 2000 does not allow
me to install it.

 Also, I have my private statistical software
I often use when I work at night during business trips.
I would like to load it as well.

Vince


There are Unresolved/Open items in the vendor payables system (iPayIt) and employee reimbursement system (XMS).  Employees are strongly encouraged to resolve items in their inboxes.  Please either process and approve, or reject these outstanding business expenses in your inboxes by 2:00 p.m. Monday, December 3, 2001.

For assistance with XMS please contact:
Enron Travel Management
(713) 345-6252, enron travel@enron.com <mailto:travel@enron.com>.

For assistance with iPayIt please contact:
Integrated Solutions Center
(713) 345-4727, iPayit@enron.com <mailto:iPayit@enron.com>


The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power is refusing to sell outside of
California for less than $250.  This is diminishing liquidity in the market.
However, we can't call FERC and complain because munis are not regulated by
FERC.  Here is an example of something we should be bringing to NW
congressional members re why FERC should regulate the munis.


Hi Colin -

Ken Lay asked me to advise you that this is fine with him.

Rosie

Colin Skellett@AZURIX
10/26/2000 10:20 AM
Sent by: Lisa Hobbs@AZURIX
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: catriona.ritchie@pcc.org.uk
Subject: Duchess of Northumbria's request

Ken

Thanks for sending me the request from the Duchess of Northumbria for help
with her garden project.  I have discussed this with John Wakeham and our
view is that unless you have any other reason for helping with this, we
should say a polite "no".

The background is summarised on the attached briefing note from Mike O'Neill,
Managing Director of Lurgi Invent.

Alnwick Castle is several hundred miles out of the Wessex region so it really
is difficult to justify any Wessex help.  Lurgi Invent has done a little work
for the Duchess in providing water features for the garden.  However, this
business currently loses o1 million a year so we would be reluctant to see
any sponsorship out of Lurgi Invent.

Given the nature of the project, the approach from the Duchess and the fact
that she can clearly afford to pay for it herself, we really do believe no is
the right answer.

Please let me know if you want any further information or if you want me to
correspond direct with the Duchess.

Best wishes.

Colin


Yesterday we received a supplement to the plaintiffs' discovery that contained a damage report from the plaintiffs' damage experts.
	Plaintiffs are claiming $71 million.  This number takes into account the amounts allegedly lost from breach through March 2002, the date the plaintiffs claim they will have both machines up and running. More specifically, this number is based on:
	1.	The alleged actual costs associated with moving, operating and using the machine that was moved back to Somerset. ($12 million for 2001/ $5 million for 1/02-3/02- Total $17million)
	2.	Lost tax credits "grossed-up" for the machine that remained at Pier IX but, according to plaintiffs, was unable to make any synfuel because the plaintiffs purportedly could not get the coal to operate it. ($54 million)
	By only using the period from breach through March 2002, the plaintiffs have avoided having to make any assumptions about the spread and also have avoided having to take into account any long-term cost-savings that Enron's alleged breach provided which, we argue, they would have to apply to offset their early damages.
	We are analyzing the plaintiffs' numbers and will get back to you.


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 03:38
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 12/11/2000 03:15:31 PM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, peterthompson@akllp.com, kay.mann@enron.com,
john.r.ayres@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, Cheryl.Lipshutz@enron.com,
roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, Brett.R.Wiggs@enron.com, Ben.Jacoby@enron.com,
paulpipitone@akllp.com, robtaylor@akllp.com, chriscobb@akllp.com,
michael.storm@ss.ps.ge.com

Subject: RE: Exhibits to Enron South America Gas Turbine Purchase Agreemen t

Folks,

John Ayres and I went through the Facility Agreement and Exhibits for the
ESA Turbine Purchase Agreement.  There were a few edits needed on Guarantee
Basis (F-1) and Scope of Supply Exhibits (B and N-2).  Also, one change to
the Emissions Test Exhibit.

John and I believe other than adding in the other Exhibits B-1 and H-2, this
is ready for execution copy.  Kay, please add these in for the final
circulation.

Also, on the contract, a number of redlines were required to reflect scope
of supply (addition of interconnect piping to cooling tower, unit liability
amount, payment schedule adjustment and retention amount, guaranteed
performance levels net of all GE supplied equipment aux. loads, guaranteed
delivery schedule for purchased options.

This should be ready to go, subject to a final review of the entire contract
document.

Regards,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP)
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 11:15 AM
To: 'Thompson, Peter J.'; Kay Mann (E-mail); 'john.r.ayres@enron.com'
Cc: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP); Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE); Cheryl. Lipshutz
(E-mail); Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail); Brett. R. Wiggs (E-mail); Ben.
Jacoby (E-mail); Pipitone, Paul; Taylor, Rob; Cobb, Chris
Subject: RE: Exhibits to Enron South America Gas Turbine Purchase
Agreement

Kay,

I edited the Termination Schedule replacing the term Purchase Amount per
unit to Unit Liability Amount for consistency with the new structure.

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Peter J. [mailto:peterthompson@akllp.com]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 10:30 AM
To: Kay Mann (E-mail)
Cc: Lee. Johnson (E-mail); Kent. Shoemaker (E-mail); Cheryl. Lipshutz
(E-mail); Roseann Engeldorf (E-mail); Brett. R. Wiggs (E-mail); Ben.
Jacoby (E-mail); Pipitone, Paul; Taylor, Rob; Cobb, Chris
Subject: Exhibits to Enron South America Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement

 <<Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - without notations.DOC>>

This is the most recent draft of the exhibits.

The following items need to be added to complete the exhibits:

1. Exhibits B-1 and H-2 need to be added.

2. If one is warranted, a Seller Parent Guarantee should be
included as Exhibit C-1.

3. Does Exhibit F need to be updated and revised before signing?

4. In Section 3.1 of Exhibit K, the terms "Specific Date" and
"Recovery Schedule" are not defined.

5. For Exhibit T, please confirm that Enron has received all
documents that it should have received by now.

 - Enron South America Turbine Agreement (version 4 to 5)_GEredline121100.DOC
 - Exhibits to Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - without
notations_GEredline121100.DOC


Please get me Pat Wood's phone number and post a reminder on my calendar to
call him ASAP


i called her and she still isn't there.  i wonder if she still has a job
here.


Southern Union for May
2100 83 st
2100 Port Arthur

These are my estimates. The volumes for April at T-ville and Colorado RS are
either spot or April only. Janet does not know about next month yet.
So, 5000 total is a safe assumption.


We are finalizing the master netting agreement among BNP Paribas and Enron Corp., et al for execution, and have received copies of all underlying documentation with the exception of documentation for Enron Metals Limited.  Can you fax or e-mail me a copy of what documentation Enron Metals Limited signs--ISDA, general terms and conditions, etc. with BNP Paribas?   We need to receive this documentation ASAP.

Thanks for your help.

Marie

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com


John,

The new products have been built and are in the process of being mapped to
Sitara and Tagg.  I'm working with Melba Lozano (EOL contact) and she tells
me they should be ready tomorrow.

Mark Taylor and I haven't spoken yet about simplifying the language in the
product long description, so I'll try to get with him tomorrow.  For now,
we're staying with the existing language which isn't really that bad.

Any of these products which are intra-month will stay in the swap filter as
US GAS DAILY products, but longer than intra-month will be in the basis
filter as US GAS BASIS products with the format:

  US GAS BASIS      GD/D SoCal - HHub

The only product that will be different is the Nymex to daily swap which will
be:

  US GAS BASIS      NXL1 - GD/D HHub

Any questions or comments,

Fletch
x3-6219


Susan is running a little late this morning and is expected to be in the office around 9:15 a.m.  Thanks.

Esmeralda Gonzalez
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB3815
Houston, Texas 77002
E-mail: Esmeralda.Gonzalez@enron.com
Phone: 713.345.7621
Fax: 713.646.3393


<http://subscribe.wsj.com/services2>

If your system does not support the movie below, you can view it on the Internet by clicking here. <http://subscribe.wsj.com/servicesemail>

http://subscribe.wsj.com/servicesemail

Visit Services.wsj.com <http://subscribe.wsj.com/services1> Today!

Documents:

http-services.wsj.com.html <http://pull.xmr3.com/p/74713-6288/31337069/http-services.wsj.com.html> (172 bytes)

This message is being sent by The Wall Street Journal.

You received this e-mail as a valued subscriber of The Wall Street Journal. Occasionally, we use e-mail for fast, paperless communications with our customers. If you do not wish to receive these notices in the future, please visit our Web site at:
<http://subscribe.wsj.com/cgi-bin/go.cgi?ID=EJ&A=091597993614>
and indicate your preferences.


Jeff, Just looking at teeing my a schedule.. any feedback from either/ both.

BT


What is the opportunity to look at Elba Island space in conjunction with the
Dhabol supply contract?  That is, could we go to our LNG suppliers for India,
and regotiate that contract and provide space for diverted cargoes if
necessary.  Jim Hughes is spending his time figuring out what to do with
Dhabol and any suggestions we have may be helpful.

Thanks.


lets figure a date and a location.  i know max wants vegas so i think we
should go there.  if we need to do october that is cool too.


This article stems from confidential docs submitted to the Governor's office,
which were leaked to the press.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/02/2001 09:54 AM -----

	smara@enron.com
	Sent by: articles-email@ms1.lga2.nytimes.com
	05/02/2001 09:51 AM
	Please respond to smara

		 To: smara@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: NYTimes.com Article: Power Concern Offers California a Secret Deal

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by smara@enron.com.

/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

Let NYTimes.com Come to You

Sign up for one of our weekly e-mails
and the news will come directly to you.
YOUR MONEY brings you a wealth of analysis
and information about personal investing.
CIRCUITS plugs you into the latest on
personal technology. TRAVEL DISPATCH offers
you a jump on special travel deals and news.

http://email.nytimes.com/email/email.jsp?eta5

\----------------------------------------------------------/

Power Concern Offers California a Secret Deal

By JEFF GERTH and LOWELL BERGMAN

 uke Energy, a power-generating company accused of overcharging
customers millions of dollars during California's year-old energy
crisis, has secretly offered Gov. Gray Davis a deal that it hopes
will solve its legal problems while helping to calm the state's
chaotic electricity markets.

 The proposed settlement, outlined in documents prepared in March
by Duke's lawyers, calls for an end to various state
investigations, private lawsuits and state complaints to federal
authorities accusing Duke of overcharging.

 In return, Duke would make an unspecified "appropriate payment"
but admit no wrongdoing.

 "Duke is committed to sharing pain" and "expediting high-level
confidential discussions that would embrace the governor's
political and public relations needs," according to the documents,
which were given to The New York Times by someone who wanted the
issue aired publicly.

 Governor Davis acknowledged the secret discussions in an interview
in San Francisco yesterday, and said he hoped to meet with more
generators soon. But he insisted that none of the companies would
escape a substantial payment because, he said, they have penalized
the state with excessive prices.

 "My general approach to the energy companies is that you have
already charged the utilities a 50 percent credit penalty for the
power they were buying from you," Mr. Davis said, so "you're going
to have to have a very substantial reduction" in what the companies
are owed.

 Mr. Davis said Duke had walked in with "a number of demands,"
including an end to state inquiries but that that was not likely to
happen.

 "We're not about to call off the dogs," said the governor, a
Democrat who will seek re-election next year.

 Duke, based in Charlotte, N.C., is a major investor in
California's wholesale electricity market, having spent more than
$1 billion since the state opened its generating plants to outside
operators in 1996.

 It is also near the top of the list of companies accused of
overcharging. Duke has been ordered by federal regulators to
justify or refund $20 million in disputed charges this year, an
amount that is third-highest among federally regulated companies in
the California market.

 By entering secret negotiations with Mr. Davis and being the first
generator to settle, Duke could gain a public-relations advantage,
in much the same way that the Liggett Group donned a white hat by
being the first company to open talks with the state governments in
the tobacco-litigation wars.

 "We've just simply tried to be part of the solution," Richard B.
Priory, Duke's chairman and chief executive, said in an interview,
adding that the company was "offering ideas" and "throwing in
suggestions."

 Publicly, Mr. Davis has disparaged out-of-state electricity
generators before and after he began talking with them privately.
In an interview two weeks ago with The Los Angeles Times, he called
the generators "the biggest snakes on the planet Earth" for their
pricing practices.

 California's electricity costs have risen to about $28 billion
last year from $7 billion in 1999. By some estimates, they could
approach $70 billion this year * $2,000 for every resident. The
state has stepped in to buy power for financially crippled
utilities, including Pacific Gas and Electric, which is now in
bankruptcy court.

 The Davis administration has struck power deals with companies
like Duke in hopes of securing a stable and affordable source of
power. To pay those bills, Mr. Davis is seeking the largest
municipal bond issue in American history, $12 billion, although
some state officials privately estimate that the final amount will
be higher.

 The governor hopes the bond issue will eventually take the state's
taxpayers off the hook. But how those costs are allocated among
ratepayers, utilities and generators, and whether the bond issue
can even succeed, remain unanswered questions. A major impediment
to resolving the electricity crisis, according to state officials,
utility executives and economists, is the secrecy surrounding the
administration's negotiations.

 Several Republicans have sued the Davis administration to learn
the terms of specific contracts entered into by the state. On
Monday, the administration released a 67-page financial analysis,
including its most detailed disclosure about the overall costs of
state electricity contracts. Last week Republicans blocked
legislation that Mr. Davis says he needs to pass the bond issue.
The bill could come up for a vote later this week.

 "The thing that has hindered Governor Davis the most among the
legislative ranks is the demand for secrecy over the negotiations
and the agreements that have been reached," said Senator Joseph L.
Dunn, a Democrat from Santa Ana and the chairman of a select
committee investigating the price spikes.

 Mr. Davis, in the interview, said there were legitimate commercial
reasons for keeping contract terms confidential.

 The political uncertainty has spilled over into the markets, where
the bonds would have to be sold. The state's credit rating, while
still solid, is slipping.

 Already companies that do business with California, like Duke, are
citing the state's creditworthiness as a reason for charging higher
prices in their dealing with the state, though the state has
stepped in as buyer since February.

 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission recently ordered
generators to justify high prices in California this year or pay
$125 million in refunds. The companies * including Duke, Reliant
Energy, Dynegy Inc. and the Williams Company * deny any wrongdoing
and cite the state's credit situation as one reason for the high
prices.

 Mr. Priory, the Duke chairman, said that resolution of credit
issues would lead his company to drop the so-called "credit
premium" it now charges on power sales. As of March 7, Duke was
owed more than $100 million by the state's power managers,
documents show.

 In its confidential submission to Mr. Davis and his aides, Duke
said it would "forgive an appropriate amount of certain
receivables, or make an appropriate payment based upon a
methodology that fairly represents its share of alleged
overcharges."

 The documents do not give an amount, but Duke's 2000 annual report
shows that its wholesale energy division had written off $110
million for power sales to California that had not been collected.
(Even with that write-off, the unit's profits before taxes doubled
from 1999 to 2000, and quadrupled for the first quarter of this
year.)

 Duke's "preliminary global settlement template" of March 9 goes
on: "Duke is committed to sharing pain with state and others on a
fair and equitable basis, without admitting legal liability,
because Duke has done nothing illegal."

 Duke says that much of its California power was sold last year on
the forward markets, not the more volatile and higher-priced spot
markets. But Mr. Priory also noted in his interview that at least
10 percent was sold for "whatever the market price is."

 On March 23, Duke's lawyer, at the request of Mr. Davis's legal
affairs secretary, forwarded to the governor's office additional
information about pending litigation involving Duke and its power
sales in California. The documents show that a top Duke priority is
the "prompt suspension of state investigations, lowering of
rhetoric and stay of state litigation," as well as the withdrawal
of state-related claims at the federal energy commission.

 Also in March, the operators of the state's power grid told the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that wholesale electricity
prices in California were more than $6 billion above competitive
prices over the previous 10 months. Duke has questioned the
methodology of that submission and wants the claim withdrawn.

 The inquiries of concern to Duke include those being conducted by
the office of the attorney general, William Lockyer, and the
California Public Utilities Commission.

 Barry P. Goode, the governor's legal affairs secretary, says he
subsequently referred Duke's lawyer to the attorney general's
office. The two state agencies say that their inquiries are
continuing. Sandra Michioku, a spokeswoman for Mr. Lockyer, said,
"Our investigation is ongoing."

 Loretta Lynch, the president of the utility commission, said in a
telephone interview yesterday, "The public utilities commission has
not been involved in any settlement discussions with generators and
our investigations into overcharges and withholding are ongoing and
strong."

 The Duke documents say the company should be given preferential
treatment for its conciliatory stance.

 Other generators said they were not involved in settlement
discussions with Mr. Davis.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/02/national/02DAVI.html?ex=989822260&ei=1&en=70
3c8bd8125d53df

/-----------------------------------------------------------------\

Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the
most authoritative news coverage on the Web,
updated throughout the day.

Become a member today! It's free!

http://www.nytimes.com?eta

\-----------------------------------------------------------------/

HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
help@nytimes.com.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 01:19
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kori Loibl                           10/31/2000 01:52 PM

To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia Perkins/HOU/EES@EES, Crystal
Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT, Purvi Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Reside/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin
Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Michael Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beau
Ratliff/HOU/EES@EES, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: FW: Success. . .]

>
> Ah life,
>
> If you stop and think about it, this is sad, but true........
>
> At Age 4...................Success is........Not peeing in your pants
>
> At Age 12.................Success is........Having friends
>
> At Age 16.................Success is........Having a Driver's License
>
> At Age 20.................Success is........Having Sex
>
> At Age 35.................Success is........Having money
>
> At Age 50.................Success is........Having money
>
> At Age 60.................Success is........Having Sex
>
> At Age 70.................Success is........Having a Driver's License
>
> At Age 75.................Success is........Having friends
>
> At Age 80.................Success is........Not peeing your pants


Dear Ken and Linda,
I just want you to know William and I have been praying for you.  I know your hearts so I don't look at the circumstances and neither does God.  It doesn't depend on the circumstances, the strength of your arm or your voice.  I hope you find this encouraging and uplifting.
I wanted to share some verses with you both and some things that Oswald Chambers says in his book His Utmost for His Highest.  "My eager desire and hope being that I may never feel ashamed, but that now as ever I may do honour to Christ in my own person by fearless courage." Phil. 1:20
"We shall all feel ashamed if we do not yield to Jesus on the point He asked us to yield to Him.  To get there is a question of will, not of debate nor of reasoning, but a surrender of will, an absolute and irrevocable surrender on that point.  An over-weaning consideration for ourselves is the thing that keeps us from that decison, though we put it that we are considering others.  When we consider what it will cost others if we obey the call of Jesus, we tell God He does not know what our obedience will mean.  Keep to the point;  He does know.  Shut out every other consideration and keep yourself before God for this one thing only- My Utmost for His Highest.  I am determined to be absolutely and entirely for Him and for Him alone. Whether that means life or death, no matter.  Paul is determined that nothing shall deter him from doing exactly what God wants.  God's order has to work up to a crisis in our lives because we will not ! heed the gentler way.   He brings us to the place where He askes us to be our utmost for Him, and we begin to debate; then He produces a providential crisis where we have to decide- for or against, and from that point the "Great Divide" begins.  If the crisis has come to you on any line, surrender your will to Him absolutely and irrevocably.  What do you expect to do?  You do not know what you are going to do; the only thing you know is that God knows what He is doing.  Trust Him entirely.  You may not know what He will do next, but you have to trust He does.  We need to come in close contact with the teachings of Jesus Christ.  If we have never had the experience of taking our commonplace religious shoes off our commonplace religious feet, and getting rid of all the undue familiarity with which we approach God it is questionable whether we have ever stood in His presence."
God bless you during this time.  We will continue to pray for God's will in your lives.
Sincerely,
Barbara T. Collins.


Baby, I'm going to San Francisco on Aug 14?(Sunday) returning Wednesday.
Wanna go??


I had received this in an e-mail, wasn't sure if you had gotten a copy.

Stacey


----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 04:23 PM -----

	Mark Whitt
	Sent by: Mark Whitt
	02/15/2001 04:17 PM

		 To: brianday@aec.ca
		 cc:
		 Subject: Opal Transaction Agreements

Brian this is a draft version of what the Transaction Agreements would like.
Let me know if the form looks right to you.  Obviously we will adjust to what
the actual deal is.

Thanks

Mark


he asked for HGA NOx presentation.


Here is a copy of my itinerary.  Please forward acopy of yours so that we may
coordinate.

Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000
11:02 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Airam Arteaga                           10/30/2000 03:33 PM

To: Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: PATRICE L. MIMS THURSTON UPDATED ITINERARY

The cheapest rental car company for a mid-size vehicle is Advantage for
$54.83 a day.
Let me know if you want it.

Rain
---------------------- Forwarded by Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 03:31
PM ---------------------------

Madeleine Cardoso <madeleine.cardoso@travelpark.com> on 10/30/2000 03:14:26 PM
To: "'airam.arteaga@enron.com'" <airam.arteaga@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: PATRICE L. MIMS THURSTON UPDATED ITINERARY

                                                   SALES AGT: CB/ZLOZ5I

                                          MIMS THURSTON/PATRICE L
                                          EB 3186
                                          ETKT
  ENRON CORP

  DATE:  OCT 30 2000

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  02NOV HOUSTON TX     PHOENIX AZ     545P    731P
CO 1505    B          THU   G.BUSH INTERCO SKY HARBOR INT
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL 4
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:46 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 757-200/300
                            SEAT 17C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED MIMS THURSTON/P

CAR                   02NOV ADVANTAGE              PHOENIX AZ
                      05NOV CONFIRMATION: 6018805299RZ
                            TELEPHONE: 602-244-0450
                            FAX: 602-244-1717
                            INTERMED CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD54.83DY UNL .00MI 3DAY BASE RATE
                            164.49 UNL
                            RATE GUARANTEED
                            PICK-UP: 300 S 24TH ST
                            DROP-OFF: 300 S 24TH ST

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  05NOV PHOENIX AZ     HOUSTON TX     1127A   300P
CO 1800    B          SUN   SKY HARBOR INT G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL 4     TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:33 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-700
                            SEAT 08C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED MIMS THURSTON/P
               THIS IS A NON-REFUNDABLE FARE THAT REQUIRES
               TRAVEL ON THESE SPECIFIC DATES AND FLIGHTS.
               ANY CHANGES WILL RESULT IN A PENALTY AND/OR
                         ADDITIONAL COLLECTION.
           **************************************************
         YOUR TICKET REFLECTS A NEGOTIATED DISCOUNT FROM THE TAP
              THE PUBLISHED FARE FOR THIS TICKET IS $370.00
           **************************************************

MISCELLANEOUS         04JAN HOUSTON TX
                      THU   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/LWLPLP

MIMS THURSTON/PATRICE L  S5C0413R0076    TICKET:CO/ETKT 005 7014900555

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COBY391845/INVAL NAME FOR ACCT
ASSISTANT: ANGIE 713 853-5772
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRONASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS: IN U.S 800 523-6586/INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*******************************************
THIS IS A NON-REFUNDABLE FARE THAT REQUIRES
TRAVEL ON THESE SPECIFIC DATES AND FLIGHTS.
ANY CHANGES WILL RESULT IN A PENALTY AND/OR
ADDITIONAL COLLECTION.
ARES CHANGE FREQUENTLY. WE WILL HAPPILY RE-EVALUATE
YOUR FARE UPON REQUEST.
******************************************************
THIS IS THE PASSENGER RECEIPT FOR YOUR ELECTRONIC TICKET.
PLEASE CHECK-IN WITH PHOTO IDENTIFICATION AND WITH
EITHER (1) THIS RECEIPT OR (2) YOUR CONFIRMATION NUMBER.
YOUR E-TKT CONFIRMATION NUMBER IS: LWLPLP
*****************************************************
TICKET PRICE IS 308.44 ROUNDTRIP NONREFUNDABLE


Sara:

Per our conversation, attached please find (i) a black lined version of the
Guaranty, marked to show our changes, and (ii) the marked and clean
Institutional Account Agreement.

Please call us once you have had a chance to review the attached documents.

Regards,

Anna Meytina

 <<056 Guaranty ( Bear Stearns - Enron Corp Form).doc>>  <<IAA021301.doc>>
<<IAA021301execution.doc>>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 1:40 PM
> To: ameytina@bear.com
> Subject: corporate guaranty
>
> Anna:
>
> Attached is the form of Enron corp. guaranty.
>
> (See attached file: 056 Guaranty ( Bear Stearns - Enron Corp Form).doc)
>
>
> Sara Shackleton
> Enron North America Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
> Houston, Texas  77002
> 713-853-5620 (phone)
> 713-646-3490 (fax)
> sara.shackleton@enron.com << File: 056 Guaranty ( Bear Stearns - Enron
> Corp Form).doc >>

 - 056 Guaranty ( Bear Stearns - Enron Corp Form).doc
 - IAA021301.doc
 - IAA021301execution.doc
***********************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************


Okay, here's the rest of the Gators' home schedule and the Longhorns' schedule
for comparison.

          Gators              Longhorns
Oct 7          LSU            Oklahoma in Dallas
Oct 14         Auburn              at Colorado
Nov 11         South Carolina      at Kansas

Do you go to the game Oklahoma game in Dallas?  I went one year and it was a
lot
of fun.

So, if you have any desire to do this swap, let me know.


Here's a thought that didn't occur to me when I marked up the mock trial
script.  Should we have the consultants prominantly feature "IPEC
Busters"???  Unless we are pretty sure the judge will keep it out on
relevance grounds, it might be useful to at least get some juror reactions to
it.  With or without the specific IPEC Busters stuff, we probably ought to
assume that Jad's theme will be that Northern's whole philosophy was to
breach contracts without flinching if it served our commercial interests.
The vitriol from P&P and the other producers plays into that theme.  Maybe we
ought to spice that part of the script up a bit also just so we can see how
our response plays.  DF


Steve,

I am very happy for Mexico.  There is no perfect candidate, nevertheless the
positive impact of finally having a change in the party in power after 71
years is beyond our forecast ability.  At last,  we are going to have more
checks and balances in the system with all the benefits that they will bring
to the country  to a more democratic way of doing things.  Also with the
checks and balances everybody will have to listen, respect and negotiate with
others.  It's going to be fun.

For us it means:

1.  A couple of weeks ago I had a meeting with a key Fox advisor and we will
have the opportunity to participate in the design of their energy policies,
and as you remember,last year I worked closely with a group of PAN
legislators (close to Fox) in helping them draft aan alternative proposal for
the reform of the electric sector.
2. The unions did not vote for the PAN and they are the main stronghold
against energy reform.  The PAN has no compromise with the unions.
3.  Industrials have backed the PAN and since yesterday energy reform has
been on Fox's agenda.  He said he would not sell assets but that he would
open the industry to private investment.  You have to start somewhere.
4. We should work very hard this summer and try to participate in the
2000-2006 National Development Plan which is a government plan that the new
administration is obligated by law  to create and publicize.  I will offer
100% of my time to help them develop the energy part tof the plan.
5.  There are rumors that our friend Luis Tellez is staying as well as some
of his undersectretaries.  Hopefully Hector Olea will stay at the CRE as well.
6.  In the medium term we could see lower interest rates for the Mexican
economy.  Since Sunday they are down more than 3 percentage points to around
14.7%.  Hopefully in a couple of yeares we should be well below the 10% mark
(depending also on the U.S. rates)

In short,  all is well south of your border.  The long transition to
democracy is over.

Best,

Ricardo

Steven J Kean@EES
07/04/2000 03:26 PM
To: Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Mexico II -- Wrong and Proud of It!

What do you think these electiion results are going to mean for us?  Are you
happy for Mexico?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 07/04/2000 03:11
PM ---------------------------

Michelle Michot Foss <mmfoss@UH.EDU> on 07/03/2000 01:08:37 PM

To:	mmfoss@UH.EDU
cc:

Subject:	Mexico II -- Wrong and Proud of It!

Dear colleagues -- if bad predictions lead to contrary but more positive
results, then I take full blame!  Clearly, we underestimated the power of
the opportunity to vote in private in Mexico yesterday, with a vote that
actually mattered.  We overestimated the vestigial effects of the PRI
machine.  Early reactions from our advisors and research colleagues in
Mexico are strongly favorable (there is considerable Fox support among the
group, and one of our advisory board members may return to active duty in
the Fox administration).  Their reactions are tempered with cautions:

1. The vote margin is indeed likely to narrow as final returns, especially
from rural and southern states with heavy PRI or PRD influence, are produced
today.  It is still viewed as unlikely that Fox will have much to work with
in the Congress, as the "PRI majority rule" is unlikely to fall to the PAN.
But, we'll see.

2. After the excitement comes the problem of governance.  Could Fox face the
problem that Germany faced after WWII, or the FSU after break up?  The
knowledge and experience regarding federal affairs lies with those who
served during the Salinas and Zedillo administrations, and thus who are
associated with PRI governance.  What appointments are likely to be made as
a consequence?  With no formal civil service, what "bumps" are likely to be
felt in this historic transition?

3. On the issue of decentralization that I raised last week, the betting is
that Fox as a former governor will indeed preside over a transfer of some,
and perhaps considerable, power and fiscal authority from federal to state
jurisdictions.

4. On the "housecleaning wish list" we can now add an item that Labastida
would have been unlikely to pursue -- a vigorous effort to commercialize
(but not privatize) the national energy companies.  Unless there are
surprises in the final vote tallies today (and this could happen) the
feeling is that Fox will still be bound by campaign rhetoric and limited by
lack of a PAN majority in Congress.  But even if the attention these next
six years were on getting things in order -- improved financial and
accounting practices, establishing better capital budgeting processes (with
the PRI-Pemex bond now broken, this long-time goal for Pemex could be
realized), increasing transparency for operations, upgrading management
skills and resolving environmental problems and disputes with landowners and
state governments -- that would be a major improvement.  But this will
entail a major effort and significant culture shift within CFE and Pemex.

Certainly, our malaise regarding our Mexico case study has lifted.  Our
activities for the remainder of the year should be quite exciting.

Michelle Michot Foss, Ph.D.
Director, Energy Institute
College of Business Administration
University of Houston
Houston, TX  77204-6283 USA
Tel. 713-743-4634
Fax 713-743-4881
www.uh.edu/energyinstitute


Forgot to cc you on this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Panus, Stephanie
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:29 AM
To:	Bell, Rebecca
Cc:	Anderson, Diane; Monterrey, Maribel; Conner, Andrew R.
Subject:	Boise Cascade Corporation

Attached for your further handling are Annex B and B-1 for Boise Cascade Corporation.  Please call me if you have any questions.

Stephanie Panus
Enron Wholesale Services
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490


Enjoy a well-deserved afternoon off.  I appreciate your notes when you are
out on who to contact.  Have a great weekend.  --Sally

Jeffrey C Gossett
02/02/2001 11:09 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Afternoon - 2/2/01

If you need anything this afternoon,  please call Kam (x35781) or I will be
checking my messages.

Thanks


no i'm not.  take that patch off.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

yes you are

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i don't think that i am liking you too much today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 9:17 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

it wasnt at the top of my to do list

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 9:16 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

you didn't tell me that becky got engaged.


Kate,

You wrote:
"Question #2 - The third choice says "Neither party can more than the
other." I'm not sure if I understand this, or if there's a word missing.
Question on the supply and demand on textbooks, parts B and C. One questions
states "What price does not seller receive?" Again, I'm not sure whether you
mean the price that the seller does NOT receive or if "not" is an mistakenly
placed word."

I am sorry about the typos.  I will give you credit for those problems.

Scott


Call me tomorrow so we can discuss the following:

Employee morale
Terminations with cash already paid
Other terminations to ensure they are not affecting downstream systems
Scheduling cuts

Thanks,
Stacey


System:  Production Interface Server (SPR1INF1)

Outage Abstract:   	Production Interface Server Outage
Outage Description:  	Production Interface Server Outage due to emergency
maintenance.
Outage Implication:   	Server will be unavailable.
Contact Name:  	Tracy Terrell   Contact Number: 888-610-8937


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

March 23, 2001 5:00pm through March 26, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  Decommission CORPHOU-02B
Environments Impacted:  Corp Logins
Purpose: The SAM size on this DC has increased beyond recommended limits.
There is no real reason for us to keep this DC online anymore.
Backout: Bring back online
Contact(s):  Keith Meurer    713-853-1743

Impact:  ENS
Time:  Sun 3/25/2001 at  3:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sun 3/25/2001 at  1:00:00 PM PT thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 3/25/2001 at  9:00:00 PM London thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Change VLANS for the EES networks at Ardmore
Environments Impacted:  EES
Purpose: Part of the re-design, due to problems with the OC3's
Backout: change vlans back to the old numbers
Contact(s):  Scott Shishido    713-853-3780

Impact:  ENS
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/24/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Add redundancy to the ETS server network
Environments Impacted:  ETS
Purpose: Currently the ETS server network 172.30.10.0 has no redundant links
the the routers. If one switch goes down the entire network goes down.
Backout: none
Contact(s):  Scott Shishido    713-853-3780

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 3/24/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  12:00:00 AM CT
 Sat 3/24/2001 at   9:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at    10:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 3/25/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sun 3/25/2001 at  6:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Replace ENRON.COM edge routers
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: Replace hardware with faster processing units.  IOS Software upgrade
to remove potential security vulnerability.
Backout: Put existing hardware back in production.
Contact(s):  John Shupak          713-853-7943
  Bryan Aubuchon    713-345-8446

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA:
Impact:  Market Data
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  9:45:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  7:45:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  3:45:00 AM London
Outage:  CQG_DDA Upgrade
Environments Impacted:  CQG Digital users
Purpose: Enable migration off of Legacy satellite systems.
Backout: N/A
Contact(s):  John Sieckman    713-345-7862

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM
Outage:  Cleanup CDPD (Air Card) Configuration
Environments Impacted:  Corp.
Purpose: Running out of available addresses for air cards. Clean up
configuration on CDPD router/ Change
the method used to translate the aircards IP addresses.
See Change Request  # JW918 for IP addresses.
Backout: apply old config
Contact(s):  Jon Werner    713-853-6742

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 3/23/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 AM
London
Outage:  SysAdmiral Master Server Move
Environments Impacted:  Corp
Purpose: This server move is to replace the failed server that occurred last
weekend. The current location for the master machine online is in 3448. Since
it is on a development segment it has to be moved back into the production
area.
We will need only one hour to move the machine since it it is replacing a
1600 with a 1600. Rails and racking can be reused without rewiring anything.
Backout: Rerack in current location.
Contact(s):  Rusty Cheves    713-345-3798

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 3/23/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  12:00:00 PM CT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  10:00:00 AM PT
 Fri 3/23/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/24/2001 at  6:00:00 PM London
Outage:  OS and Disk upgrade, patch maintenance and migration to T-3 for
server titania.
Environments Impacted:  Oracle development
Purpose: Need for additional storage and improved performance.
Backout: shutdown the system
reconnect the old disks
restore the old OS from tape
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


The following companies were granted a declaratory judgment from the
Imperial County Supreme Court to suspend deliveries of capacity and
energy to Edison, and to resell energy and capacity to other purchasers:

Salton Sea Power Generation
Fish Lake Power
Vulcan/BN Geothermal Power Company
Elmore, LP
Leathers, LP
Del Ranch, LP


I'm having Chris Foster check on these deals. Stewart is overseas for the
holidays and won't be back for awhile, so in the meantime Chris and I will do
our best to find out which deals he was referring to. Let me know if anything
resembling these deals comes up on your end.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           12/27/2000 01:16 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: City of Roseville

Stewart called last Friday and said there would be some deals for the City of
Roseville to be confirmed.  He did not have deal numbers for these deals, and
so far, I have not seen any deals for this counterparty.  Do you know
anything about these deals?  Can check around and see if anyone else knows
about them?

Thanks!


EnronOnline
Trade Counts and Volume for May 16, 2001
			EXTERNAL		INTERNAL		TOTAL
COUNTRY	COMMODITY	CATEGORY	COUNT	QTY	COUNT	QTY	COUNT	QTY	UNIT OF MEASURE
Austria	Power	Physical	            11 	                  9,968 	             -
                      -   	        11 	             9,968 	MWh
Belgium	Natural Gas	Physical	              6 	              785,000 	             -
                        -   	          6 	         785,000 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Financial	              2 	           1,370,000 	             -
                       -   	          2 	      1,370,000 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Physical	          250 	           6,444,907 	             -
                    -   	      250 	      6,444,907 	MMBtu
Canada	Power	Financial	              5 	                     636 	              1
                      24 	          6 	                660 	MWh (Canada)
Germany	Coal	Physical	              3 	                       27 	             -
                        -   	          3 	                  27 	SECA Contract -
Metric Tonnes
Germany	Power	Physical	            73 	           1,075,260 	             -
                   -   	        73 	      1,075,260 	MWh
Netherlands	Power	Physical	              3 	                  1,171
-   	                        -   	          3 	             1,171 	MWh
Norway	Power	Financial	            18 	              419,400 	             -
                    -   	        18 	         419,400 	MWh
Singapore	Crude	Financial	              1 	                50,000 	              1
                50,000 	          2 	         100,000 	Barrel
Singapore	Oil Products	Financial	              2 	                20,000 	             -
                        -   	          2 	           20,000 	metric tonnes
Switzerland	Power	Physical	            16 	                22,140
-   	                        -   	        16 	           22,140 	MWh
United Kingdom	Crude	Financial	            11 	              520,000 	              1
            25,000 	        12 	         545,000 	Barrel
United Kingdom	LPG	Financial	              1 	                  2,000 	             -
                      -   	          1 	             2,000 	mt
United Kingdom	Metals	Financial	          632 	                16,725 	            71
                 125 	      703 	           16,850 	LME Registered mt Lot
United Kingdom	Natural Gas	Physical NBP	            89 	         12,939,600 	              2
           247,500 	        91 	    13,187,100 	MMBtu
United Kingdom	Oil Products	Financial	              9 	                50,500 	             -
                      -   	          9 	           50,500 	IPE mt
United Kingdom	Petchems	Financial	              2 	                  2,000
-   	                        -   	          2 	             2,000 	mt
United Kingdom	Power	Physical	            16 	              903,840 	             -
                    -   	        16 	         903,840 	MWh
USA	Crude	Financial	          213 	           9,845,000 	          107
4,845,000 	      320 	    14,690,000 	Barrel
USA	Crude	Financial Option	              6 	              300,000 	             -
                   -   	          6 	         300,000 	Barrel
USA	Crude	Physical	              6 	              423,000 	             -
                 -   	          6 	         423,000 	Barrel
USA	Emissions	Physical	              4 		             -   		          4
      -   	Emission allowance
USA	Gas Pipeline Capacity	Physical	              1 	                10,000
-   	                        -   	          1 	           10,000 	MMBtu
USA	LPG	Financial	              4 	                95,000 	             -
                 -   	          4 	           95,000 	Gallon
USA	LPG	Physical	              1 	                  5,000 	             -
                 -   	          1 	             5,000 	Gallon
USA	Metals	Physical	              1 	                       40 	             -
                      -   	          1 	                  40 	COMEX Physical
Copper Lots
USA	Natural Gas	Financial	       1,190 	       518,925,650 	          649
239,099,683 	   1,839 	  758,025,333 	MMBtu
USA	Natural Gas	Financial Option	            25 	         22,810,000 	              7
     7,000,000 	        32 	    29,810,000 	MMBTU
USA	Natural Gas	Physical	       1,947 	         21,865,771 	            36
   204,418 	   1,983 	    22,070,189 	MMBtu
USA	Oil Products	Financial	            36 	           1,020,000 	             -
               -   	        36 	      1,020,000 	Barrel
USA	Paper	Physical	              2 	                       48 	             -
                     -   	          2 	                  48 	Short Tons (+/- 5%)
USA	Petchems	Financial	              3 	                50,000 	             -
                      -   	          3 	           50,000 	Gallon
USA	Power	Financial	            51 	              336,042 	            15
     101,108 	        66 	         437,150 	MWh
USA	Power	Physical	          546 	           7,503,204 	          179
4,686,582 	      725 	    12,189,786 	MWh
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	             -   	                        -
  5 	           6,603,772 	          5 	      6,603,772 	EUR/1
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	             -   	                        -
  2 	           5,000,000 	          2 	      5,000,000 	FX USD
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	             -   	                        -
  1 	              600,000 	          1 	         600,000 	GBP/1
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	             -   	                        -
  2 	           1,300,000 	          2 	      1,300,000 	USD/1
USA	Weather	Financial	              2 	                         5
-   	                        -   	          2 	                    5 	Cooling
Degree Day
			       5,188 		       1,079 		   6,267


Bill.

I've taken a look at your resume and pulled your internal reviews.  We have
decided to go another route.  Sorry.  I'll be in Houston for the next three
weeks if you want to talk to me.

John.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           09/11/2000 08:33 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Tech Corner - Country Risk Case Study

Vince,

Here is a copy of the article I received from Maureen/Gwyn a couple of weeks
ago.  When you get back from your  vacation, would you please let me know if
it is usable?

Thank You!

Sam

---------------------- Forwarded by William Smith/Corp/Enron on 09/11/2000
08:29 AM ---------------------------

Gwyn Koepke
08/31/2000 05:22 PM
To: William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Tech Corner - Country Risk Case Study

Sam,

Attached is a tech corner article on the british pound sterling for the next
issue of the weekly newsletter.  I will be out of the office on Friday Sept
1st.  If you have any questions or issues to address with the article, please
refer to Maureen Raymond Castaneda or Yana Kristal in my absense.  Thanks.

Gwyn


Ricardo,

Do you have this data daily?

Chris


Jeff - you should receive in the next day or so a Security Agreement from our
lawyers in Bermuda (Appleby Spurling) which has to be executed on behalf of
ENA.  I have approved these docs - in short the agreement grants us security
in a Reinsurance Contract which supports RVI's obligation under the Credit
Default Swap.

I would be grateful if you could sign where necessary and forward all copies
by courier directly to Sharon White at the following address:

Sharon White
Conyers Dill & Perman
Clarendon House
PO Box HM 666
Hamilton
Bermuda

Sara - I would be grateful if you could provide the requisite legal
initials.  On a separate point - Sara - can you confirm that Greg Whalley has
the authority to sign on behalf of ENA - if so can you have someone fax me a
copy of the signatory authority.

If you have any questions give me buzz.

Many tks

Denis

PS - Drop me a mail when the docs have gone so I can chase-up with Sharon.

---------------------- Forwarded by Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT on 21/02/2001
18:42 ---------------------------

Tonesan Furbert <TFurbert@ASK.BM>@ASK.BM> on 16/01/2001 19:55:38
Sent by: Alex Ratteray <ARatteray@ASK.BM>
To: "'Denis.O'Connell@enron.com'" <Denis.O'Connell@enron.com>
cc: SEWhite@cdp.bm

Subject: Enron

Dear Dennis

I hope the New Year is treating you well.  I confirm that I have received
today 2 copies of the Security Agreement duly executed for and on behalf of
the R.V.I.. Guaranty Co., Ltd. and acknowledged and agreed by Continental
Insurance Company.  Please confirm our delivery instructions.  Are these
documents to be couriered to Jeff Kinnaman at Enron North America Corp.,
1400 Smith's Street, Houston, Texas 77002, USA, Tel: 1 713 853 5398

I look forward to hearing from you.

With kind regards

Tonesan Amissah-Furbert
Partner
41 Cedar Avenue, Hamilton HM 12
P O Box HM 1179, Hamilton HM EX
Bermuda
Email: tfurbert@ask.bm
Direct Telephone: +441 298-3201
Direct Fax: +441 298-3336
http:\\www.ask.bm
http:\\www.justaskinc.bm

**********************************************************************

AS&K is pleased to offer our clients the ability to incorporate
a Bermuda Company online. Visit our website at
http://www.justaskinc.bm/ to begin an incorporation.

The information in this Internet e-mail is confidential and
may be legally privileged.  It is intended solely for the
addressee.  Access by any other person to this Internet
e-mail is not authorised.  If you are not the intended recipient,
please delete this Internet e-mail.  Any disclosure of this
Internet e-mail or of the parties to it, any copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is
prohibited, and may be unlawful.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************


Hi bub, I could only see images 3 and 4.  I couldn't access the mayadon bowl
or the lenoble.  is there a problem with the viewer in those files?
Stop working so late.  Jeff

"Ben Macklowe" <Ben@macklowegallery.com> on 10/25/2000 07:46:50 PM
To: <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: 4 pretty vases

Jeff:? attached is a memo describing the four  email photos you will
receive.?? It's 9 at night and I'm going  home.? Call me when you have looked
this over.
?
Chowders
Ben
 - Shankman memo, 10-25-00.doc


The attorney at Aquila is Dave Perez.   I will be happy to negotiate a GISB
with these guys, or if they want to speak to an attorney, Stacy Dickson (713-
853-5705)  is available.  Please let me know if I can be of  further
assistance.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


As a follow-up to the Enron Net Works All Employee meeting on October 5, we are pleased to announce a number of organizational changes.

Beth Perlman, currently CIO for EA Systems, will work closely with Mark Pickering on a number of key projects for Enron Net Works.  Additionally, Beth plans to explore various commercial opportunities within Enron.  Replacing Beth in her current role will be Steve Hotte, currently CIO for EGS.

Anthony Dayao will continue as CIO for EES Systems.  In addition to his current responsibilities, Anthony will assume responsibility for creating a combined Wholesale/Retail Power Trading and Risk Management system.

Jeff Johnson will move into the new role of CIO for EGM/EIM Systems.

John Paskin will transfer to the Houston office from London to take up the new role of CIO for Corporate Systems. His group will include the ISC, Enterprise Portal, Intranet Solutions, CRM strategy, Treasury Systems, Development Support and will matrix into HR IT Systems.

Continuing in their current positions are Inja Chun, CIO for EBS Systems; Paul Freeman, CIO for Enron Europe; Jay Webb, CIO for eCommerce, which now includes Commodity Logic Systems; and Jenny Rub, CIO for Infrastructure.

All of the above positions report into to Mark Pickering in the Office of the Chairman for Enron Net Works.  Transitions into their new positions will begin within the next two weeks and should be complete by the end of the year.

We are currently interviewing individuals to serve as CIO for EGS, as well as an individual to serve as head of our Enterprise Framework group.  We will keep you posted on the progress of these searches.

Please join us in congratulating all of these individuals on their new responsibilities.


Came across this deal while balancing the books Weds pm.  It looks like a preschedule for Weds that was booked into the EPMI-HRLY-SE book.  Just making sure this is correct?

brant


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		1
Task Due On:		5/31/2000
Task Start Date:	5/9/2000


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000
04:47 PM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 10/24/2000 09:31:40 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: part-time work

Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-xa04.mx.aol.com (rly-xa04.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.73])
by air-xa03.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.8) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:53:51
-0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-xa04.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:53:48 -0400
Received: from nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.39]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id MAA18325 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:53:48 -0500 (CDT)
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tac1c0a274f5497734a@nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com> for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:53:47 -0500
Subject: part-time work
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:53:49 -0500
Message-ID: <OF1EB17063.BB14093D-ON8625697C.00624EBF@enron.com>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21
March 2000) at 10/18/2000 12:50:19 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Unknown

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
01:00 PM ---------------------------

"Cantekin Dincerler" <cantekin@mail.utexas.edu> on 10/17/2000 10:40:22 AM

Please respond to <cantekin@mail.utexas.edu>

To:   <vince.j.kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  part-time work

Vince:

I enjoyed the lunch and part of your presentation last week (I had an other
engagement to attend to, and hence could not make it to the rest of the
presentation and reception following it).

I appreciate the part-time offer, however, I must admit that I did not find
the terms very favorable. Unlike a person who is permamently located in
Houston, I would have the inconvenience and cost of commuting between
Austin
and Houston, and of accomodation both in Austin and Houston.

I really would love to work in the Research Group and am sincere about
this.
I would just hope that you would consider compensating me at manager level
so that I can cover transportation, accomodation expenses and more
importantly, justify the decision to devote at least half of my time to
Enron away from my thesis.

I will be looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Best,
Cantekin Dincerler

Doctoral Candidate
The University of Texas at Austin
Graduate School of Business
Department of Finance
office: (512) 471-1676
fax   : (512) 471-5073
home  : (512) 472-5356
cell  : (512) 680-5355
http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~cantekin


---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000
03:38 PM ---------------------------

	Jill T Zivley
	02/23/2000 08:47 AM

To: Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Potential Volume list for March, 2000

FYI...this well should come on the 1st week of March, but does have gas daily
mid month pricing for the first month. Thanks.

SUSAN
SMITH
02/22/2000 01:44 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Potential Volume list for March, 2000

Darren:

 This is potential new volume for March , 2000:

 Counterparty  Meter   Volume   Mid Month Gas Daily?

 Cico Oil & Gas Co. TBA   2117 MMbtu per day Yes

 This number is NOT in Vance's production estimate. This well is anticipated
to come on the first week of March but earlier is possible.

 Please let me know if you need any additional information.

 Susan Smith x 33321


I have added four new documents to Deal Bench in connection with the Midway
site (can be found in the New Documents area).

Greg has provided me with a two more that will need to be scanned and moved
to deal bench.  I'll let you know when they are available.

Kathleen Carnahan
Enron North  America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3146d
Houston, TX 77002
Phone - (713) 345-3386
Fax - (713) 646-3037