Maureen,

Attached please find the response to Marie's questions.  I am also attaching
some strategy documents that I wrote for the Knowledge and Information
Management initiative some time ago.

Best,

Ricardo

	Maureen McVicker
	01/08/2001 11:17 AM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron,
Xi Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Chauncey Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron,
Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jean Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Geriann
Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT,
Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Damon
Harvey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kikumi Kishigami/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J
Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Arefieva/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rubena
Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Fabian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Germain
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles
Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gisele S
Braz/SA/Enron@Enron, Mike G Smith/NA/Enron@Enron, Guillermo
Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron, Ray Alvarez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Alfonso
Canedo/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Lucio
Reis/SA/Enron@Enron, Valeria Lima/SA/Enron@Enron, Javier
Pantoja/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Laurie
Knight/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Belzak/TOR/ECT@ECT, Michael
Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Laura Glenn/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey
Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marc Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Henry
Van/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathy
Mongeon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Jim
Peterson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Sandra Maldonado/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Don Stevens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Donnie
Willmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Newman/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Helen Rizzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Reblitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edith
Terry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl
Ingstad/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ann M
Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeannie Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dennis Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Michael B Rosen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margaret Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brandon
Rigney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rodney Reagor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marge
Nadasky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ralston/EU/Enron@ENRON,
Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT, Eva Hoeffelman/LON/ECT@ECT, Iona
Maclean/LON/ECT@ECT, Marianne Boubaki/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Morrison/LON/ECT@ECT, Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billie
Akhave/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Woods/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
McCarthy/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Fruge/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dawn
Fournier/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nina Garcia/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tiko Reynolds/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Betsy Raybon/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bulgawicz/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanna Hoiseth/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Clark/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Soyal/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Grubbs/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti
Ucci/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deborah Bubenko/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janelle
Duree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carole Rogers/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Hensch/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bonnie Allen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT, Kyran
Hanks/LON/ECT@ECT, Amber Keenan/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT,
Viviana Florio/FRA/ECT@ECT, Amber Keenan/LON/ECT@ECT, Thomas van
Gilst/LON/ECT@ECT, Alfredo Huertas/LON/ECT@ECT, David X
Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Justyna Ozegalska/WAR/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt.
Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen Jones/LON/ECT@ECT, Christopher J Day/Govt.
Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Kerryann Irwin/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT,
Nailia Dindarova/LON/ECT@ECT, Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Merrill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane Wilson/Enron@Gateway, June
Fernandes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth
Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Margaret
Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan Stransky/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gia
Maisashvili/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynnette Barnes/NA/Enron@Enron,
Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron, Earlene O'Connell/NA/Enron@Enron, Margo
Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Melissa Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anthony
Mends/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, George
Wasaff/Enron@EnronXGate, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pegi Newhouse/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Kathleen
Pope-Sance/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan Powell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Gillespie/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Request from Steve Kean - Information Management

If you haven't already done so, please take a moment, today, to complete the
questions below and forward them to Marie Hejka.

More responses are needed for Marie to complete her project.

Thanks.

----- Forwarded by Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 10:24 AM -----

	Marie Hejka
	12/21/2000 12:32 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron,
Xi Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Chauncey Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron,
Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jean Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Geriann
Warner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT,
Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Delaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Damon
Harvey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kikumi Kishigami/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J
Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Arefieva/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rubena
Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Fabian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Germain
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles
Yeung/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gisele S
Braz/SA/Enron@Enron, Mike G Smith/NA/Enron@Enron, Guillermo
Canovas/SA/Enron@Enron, Ray Alvarez/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Alfonso
Canedo/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Lucio
Reis/SA/Enron@Enron, Valeria Lima/SA/Enron@Enron, Javier
Pantoja/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES, Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Laurie
Knight/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Belzak/TOR/ECT@ECT, Michael
Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Laura Glenn/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey
Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marc Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Henry
Van/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathy
Mongeon/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Jim
Peterson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Sandra Maldonado/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Don Stevens/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Donnie
Willmann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Newman/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Helen Rizzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Reblitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edith
Terry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl
Ingstad/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ann M
Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeannie Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vance Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dennis Vegas/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Michael B Rosen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margaret Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brandon
Rigney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rodney Reagor/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marge
Nadasky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ralston/EU/Enron@ENRON,
Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT, Eva Hoeffelman/LON/ECT@ECT, Iona
Maclean/LON/ECT@ECT, Marianne Boubaki/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Morrison/LON/ECT@ECT, Bill Donovan/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billie
Akhave/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Woods/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
McCarthy/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Fruge/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dawn
Fournier/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nina Garcia/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tiko Reynolds/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Betsy Raybon/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Bulgawicz/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanna Hoiseth/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Clark/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Soyal/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda
Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Grubbs/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti
Ucci/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deborah Bubenko/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janelle
Duree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carole Rogers/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Hensch/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bonnie Allen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT, Kyran
Hanks/LON/ECT@ECT, Amber Keenan/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT,
Viviana Florio/FRA/ECT@ECT, Amber Keenan/LON/ECT@ECT, Thomas van
Gilst/LON/ECT@ECT, Alfredo Huertas/LON/ECT@ECT, David X
Gonzalez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Justyna Ozegalska/WAR/ECT@ECT, Paul Dawson/Govt.
Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen Jones/LON/ECT@ECT, Christopher J Day/Govt.
Affairs/LON/ECT@ECT, Kerryann Irwin/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT,
Nailia Dindarova/LON/ECT@ECT, Doug Wood/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Merrill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane Wilson/Enron@Gateway, June
Fernandes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth
Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Margaret
Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan Stransky/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gia
Maisashvili/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynnette Barnes/NA/Enron@Enron,
Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron, Earlene O'Connell/NA/Enron@Enron, Margo
Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Melissa Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anthony
Mends/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, George
Wasaff/Enron@EnronXGate, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea
Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pegi Newhouse/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Kathleen
Pope-Sance/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan Powell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Gillespie/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Information Management - A Steve Kean sponsored initiative

Per Steve Kean's direction, Enron has commissioned a small task force team to
1) Implement a yahoo-like web entry point (portal) to Enron's universe of
intranets, external search tools and extranet sites, 2) Develop a
pilot/prototype of a qualitative data retrieval tool and 3) Document a
proposed strategy for Knowledge Management/Information Management.  I am
currently chairing this task force and I need your input to enable the team
to gather information about what content should be accessible from a website.

Below are a few questions which I would like your input. Please take a few
minutes to provide your input and return your thoughts to my attention no
later than Thursday, January 4th.

Thank you for your time and support
Marie Hejka

 What internal and external web pages or web sites do you access most
frequently from your pc?  Please be specific (see examples).

Intranet (e.g., eHRonline time entry)    _Enron
homepage_____________________________________________________________

external web sites (e.g., NASDAQ)    __Yahoo stock quotes and news
services____________________________________________________________

What internal and external (Enron and third party) tools and information do
you access most frequently from your pc? Please be specific, give examples

transaction systems (e.g., SAP accounts
 payable)      _____No
access_________________________________________________________

databases (e.g., Global Counterparty)
______________________________________________________________

Microsoft products (e.g., Word, Excel)   ______Excel, Power Poin and
Word__________________________________________________

other      ______________________________________________________________

Which of these do you wish were easier to access/launch?   Why?
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________

 What tools or information do you need that you currently do not have?  Or,
you do not have easy access to?__eHRonline  most of the people in the Mexico
Operation do not have acces because of administrative and password problems


Zimin,

We upgraded her to EXCELLENT.

Vince

Zimin Lu
11/29/2000 09:00 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Li Sun

Vince,

I strongly agree with you that Li Sun did an excellent job.
If we want to get student from Whaton next summer, we are
better off to give her the rating she deserves.

Zimin


Start Date: 1/21/02; HourAhead hour: 13;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012113.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Jim,

	Per our conversation last week, I sent the following notice to NERC withdrawing from the Transmission Subcommittee.

Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walton, Steve
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 2:19 PM
To:	Bob Reed (E-mail)
Cc:	Don Benjamin (E-mail); 'Tom.Vandervort@nerc.net'
Subject:	Transmission Subcommittee Membership

Bob,

	With the changes the past few weeks at Enron, our staff will be shrinking as business is adjusted to meet new realities.  As a result, I must resign as Vice Chairman of the Transmission Subcommittee and also as a member of the committee.  It would be unfair to NERC and to the subcommittee to continue as a subcommittee member when I know I will be unable to make future meetings because of competing work commitments.  I thank you for the opportunity to participate and to express my views.  Please extend my thanks to the members of the subcommittee for their courtesy and friendship.

Sincerely,

Steve Walton


Hey Sweet Baby!

Can you answer this?

I love you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000
02:32 PM ---------------------------

"pam farmer" <fpam_@hotmail.com> on 03/06/2000 02:09:20 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: iNCOME TAX

HEY! Tonya said to staple copy B of the W-2 to the tax return--But on the
one from camp it says Copy C for payer or State Copy, Copy B for Recipient
(Keep for your records).  So which one do I send?  The one from the school
says send B but I'm confused on the other one.
What did the doctor say about Tonya & the due date? Love, Ma
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


TODAY'S HEADLINES
The New York Times on the Web
Tuesday, January 22, 2002
------------------------------------------------------------
For news updated throughout the day, visit www.nytimes.com

QUOTE OF THE DAY
=========================
"Here you lost the most important person in your life, and
nobody gives you any recognition. You just kind of get
bypassed."
-SUSANN BRADY, whose fiance, Gavin Cushny, died at the World Trade
Center.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/nyregion/22FIAN.html?todaysheadlines

NATIONAL
=========================
Scientists Report Genetic Finding That Could Aid Anthrax
Inquiry

Scientists say they have discovered genetic fingerprints
that may help determine which laboratory is the likely
source of the anthrax used in the attacks.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/science/22ANTH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Agency Backs Gas Drilling at New National Monument

A federal agency has found that allowing a company to drill
along the Missouri River in Montana will have little
environmental impact.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/politics/22DRIL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Mayhem at Cybercafes Shakes a Town in California

Gang members are descending on cafes to exact vengeance for
offenses that originate on the computer screen.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/national/22CYBE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE NATIONAL NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/national/index.html?todaysheadline

/--------------------- ADVERTISEMENT ---------------------\
Sign up now for DealBook for Breaking News and Market-Moving Intelligence

Your source for daily briefings on the latest
and most comprehensive news about market-moving
mergers and acquisitions, IPOs, private equity
transactions, venture capital deals and Wall Street
maneuverings, all delivered before the market's
opening bell.  Edited by Andrew Ross Sorkin.
Sign up now at:

http://ads.nyt.com/th.ad/th-nytiibhousec/dealbookhousetext.html/?_RM_REDIR_=http://www.nytimes.com/services/email/email.html#dealbook
\---------------------------------------------------------/

INTERNATIONAL
=========================
Gunmen Shoot at U.S. Offices in  Eastern India

Gunmen fired indiscriminately at the American Center on a
busy street in Calcutta on Tuesday, killing four police
officers and injuring 20 other people.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/international/asia/22INDI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Israeli Army Moves On 2 West Bank Cities, Killing 5 in
Nablus

The Israeli Army seized control of the Palestinian city of
Tulkarm on Monday, and this morning began moving into
Nablus, where five Palestinian militants were killed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/international/middleeast/22MIDE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

More Than $4.5 Billion Pledged in Afghan Aid Effort

The pledges, made on the first day of an international
donors' conference, came close to meeting the announced
goals of the World Bank and the United Nations.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/international/asia/22AID.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE INTERNATIONAL NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/world/index.html?todaysheadline

BUSINESS
=========================
Kmart on Verge of Bankruptcy

Kmart, the nation's third-largest discount retailer, is
expected to seek bankruptcy protection as early as this
morning.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/business/22SHOP.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Ex-Official Says Enron Employees Shredded Papers

Enron employees were shredding documents at the company's
Houston offices as recently as last week, a former
executive said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/business/22ENRO.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Industry Ponders Moves at Random House

Peter Olson, the chairman of Random House, has become the
subject of much speculation as the publisher has carried
out a round of cost cuts.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/business/media/22BOOK.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE BUSINESS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/business/index.html?todaysheadline

TECHNOLOGY
=========================
Mayhem at Cybercafes Shakes a Town in California

Gang members are descending on cafes to exact vengeance for
offenses that originate on the computer screen.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/national/22CYBE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

An I.B.M.-VeriSign Venture for E-Commerce

I.B.M. and VeriSign, an Internet security and domain-name
manager, are to announce a three-year agreement to
accelerate companies' adoption of technology to make
electronic commerce more secure.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/technology/ebusiness/22BLUE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Enron Fired Workers for Complaining Online

Enron fired at least two employees in the last two months
for posting information or negative opinions about it on
Internet message boards.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/21/business/21WORK.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE TECHNOLOGY NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/technology/index.html?todaysheadline

POLITICS
=========================
Dr. King Is Hailed by Bush in Event at the White House

The commemoration was one of the most notable events in
honor of a black American held at the White House since
President Bush took office.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/politics/22BUSH.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Enron's Woes Revive Debate on Campaigns

The Enron debacle is proving to be a windfall for the effort
to overhaul campaign finance laws.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/politics/22DONA.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Land Rich in Subsidies, and Poor in Much Else

The rice capital of America offers a stark example of the
unintended consequences of the federal farm subsidy
program.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/politics/22RICE.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE POLITICS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/politics/index.html?todaysheadline

SPORTS
=========================
Mets Get Burnitz in 3-Team Trade

The Mets got Jeromy Burnitz from Milwaukee in a three-team,
11-player trade that sent Glendon Rusch to the Brewers and
Todd Zeile and Benny Agbayani to Colorado.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/sports/baseball/22METS.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Knicks Suffer Worst Loss at Garden

The Charlotte Hornets handed the Knicks their most lopsided
loss ever at Madison Square Garden and the fifth-worst
defeat in franchise history.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/sports/basketball/22KNIC.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Kidd Shoots 1 for 17 in Loss

Jason Kidd, the Nets' point guard, missed his first 15 shots
and finished 1 for 17 in a loss to the Mavericks in Dallas.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/sports/basketball/22NETS.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE SPORTS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/sports/index.html?todaysheadline

ARTS
=========================
Carnegie's Jazz Band: Assessing the Losses

The Carnegie Hall Jazz Band, one of few active bands that
are seedbeds for jazz composition, is being disbanded after
this season, which is a shame.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/arts/music/22JAZZ.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Shakespeare's Grab Bag, Globally Rendered

"Cymbeline," now being brought delightfully to life by
Bartlett Sher and  the Theater for a New Audience, is a
kooky  grab bag of a play, a Shakespearean buffet.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/arts/theater/22CYMB.html?todaysheadlines

-----

A Comic's Hard Road Back to Work After Arrest

Paula Poundstone, a comedian with an amiably witty style,
was arrested for child abuse last June. Can she make a
comeback?
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/arts/theater/22POUN.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE ARTS NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/arts/index.html?todaysheadline

NY REGION
=========================
On King's Day, Warm Response by Blacks to Bloomberg Embrace

Mayor Bloomberg's Martin Luther King Day celebration was a
signal that African-American leaders are welcome at City
Hall.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/nyregion/22BLOO.html?todaysheadlines

-----

With 2 Congressional Seats Lost, Albany Begins Battling Over
Who Must Go

This is the year of redistricting, when the State
Legislature redraws district boundaries, based on the 2000
census.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/nyregion/22REDI.html?todaysheadlines

-----

3 Found Bound and Fatally Stabbed in Gas-Filled Apartment

A woman and two men were found slashed to death in a
ransacked apartment in the Bronx, the police said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/nyregion/22DEAD.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE NY REGION NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/nyregion/index.html?todaysheadline

OP-ED
=========================
The New China Syndrome
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
When President Bush visits Beijing next month, he needs to
tell President  Jiang Zemin  that we find the Chinese
government's abuse of the education and propaganda systems
unacceptable.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/opinion/22KRIS.html?todaysheadlines

-----

A Fiscal Fantasy
By PAUL KRUGMAN
I want to share a fantasy with you.   Trust me: it will
explain everything   you need to know about the budget
debate.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/opinion/22KRUG.html?todaysheadlines

-----

Thinkers in Need of Publishers
By RICK PERLSTEIN
The farm teams for public intellectuals -- like Lingua
Franca and Feedmag.com -- are folding.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/22/opinion/22PERL.html?todaysheadlines

-----

MORE OP-ED  NEWS:
http://www.nytimes.com/pages/opinion/index.html?todaysheadline

HOW TO CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------
You received these headlines because you requested The New
York Times Direct e-mail service. To cancel delivery,
change delivery options, change your e-mail address or sign
up for other newsletters, see http://www.nytimes.com/email.
Check or uncheck the headlines you would like to receive
and remember to go to the bottom of the page and click on
"Save Selections." To change your e-mail address, go to our
help center: http://www.nytimes.com/help.  Suggestions and
feedback are welcome at feedback@nytimes.com.

Please include the following ID number when writing to
feedback@nytimes.com so that we can track any reports of problems:
1171745

HOW TO ADVERTISE
------------------------------------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
other creative advertising opportunities with The New York
Times on the Web, please contact onlinesales@nytimes.com or
visit our online media kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo


Jennifer Whitney - 54171


Charlie,

Could you please refresh the prices for the collars and the fixed prices as
of friday's close?  We are trying to go out with the term sheet this week so
we may need to reprice it once or twice.  Can you get this turned around
Before this afternoon?  Please let me know.

Thanks for the help,

Eric

In attached see the 4/30fixed and 4/30collar sheets.


Algonquin parcels are...
3784
3785
3786
3787
3788
3789
3790

TETCO Parcels are...
016963
016964
016965
016966
016982
016983
016984

All parcel are recallable for the complete term.  Hopefully, you and CES will
complete all the paperwork for July.
Scott
713-853-7711
Chris
713-853-1610

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 05/24/2000 02:55:37 PM
To: " - *Scott.Goodell@enron.com" <Scott.Goodell@enron.com>, " -
*Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Cross, Jason" <BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Dalphon,
Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>

Subject: C&I Capacity

It's possible BUG, ConEd and Lilco may release capacity to you for June. If so
let me know. Please release Boston gas capacity to "Energy Express" and let me
know the contracts/packages. thanks


i will try to get those names for you today.  if i don't do it today just
remind me and i will get it done asap.


Hey Daren,

We're back on this issue again.  There is gas out there for days 1-3 and 6-20
but the deal is only good for 21-31.

Can you assist Anita and I w/a deal number to place the 1st 20 days on.
Anita is attempting to close this issue.

As usual, thanks for your help.

-Jackie-
3-9497
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 08:42
AM ---------------------------

	Anita Luong
	05/26/2000 08:41 AM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000 08:40
AM ---------------------------

	Anita Luong
	04/10/2000 02:13 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Jackie,
We are back on this issue again...........the deal was only good for day
21-31, don't we have to find out who this gas belong's to for days 1-20?
Stephanie still thinks this should be for Encina.   Please advice.

Thanks

Jackie Young
04/03/2000 05:19 PM
To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

I've just reallocated the meter.........................give a minute
---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 05:18
PM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
04/03/2000 05:14 PM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

yes

Jackie Young
04/03/2000 05:10 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Daren,

The above mentioned meter is on stranger's for the entire month of Jan.
2000.  There is a deal ticket applicable to this meter from Jan. 21st thru
the 31st.  Is it o.k. for Volume Management to apply volumes from the 21st
thru the 31st to the 215?

I don't know what kind of issues was associated with this deal.

Thanks
-Jackie-

---------------------- Forwarded by Jackie Young/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 05:08
PM ---------------------------

	Anita Luong
	04/03/2000 05:00 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Jackie, any luck on the issue w/ the gas allocated to "stranger's gas" at
this meter..........

---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 02:29
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           04/03/2000 10:00 AM

To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Anita, have you found out any further information about this meter.  Encina
still beleives that we owe them for this gas.

Thanks, Stephanie (3-6004)

	Anita Luong
	03/03/2000 02:11 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Jackie,
I see that the gas at this meter is allocated to "stranger's" in POPS.
Stephanie Gomes in Settlement thinks that this could be Encina's gas.  I see
in Sitara that deal 152638 is only valid from the 21st - 31st.   Can you
please take a look.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Anita Luong/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000 01:36
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           03/03/2000 01:34 PM

To: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter # 0986725 - 1/00 production - Encina Gas Marketing

Hey Anita,
For meter # 0986725, 1/00 production, I am showing per meter statement that
41,671mmbtu flowed.  Is that gas really Encina's.  Has the volume just not
been allocated yet.  Could you let me know  what the deal is on the meter.

Thanks, Stephanie ( 3-6004 )


FYI
----- Forwarded by Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 10:06 AM -----

	"Silvers, Bruce C." <silverbc@bingham.com>
	08/29/2000 08:39 AM

		 To: "'Barton Clark'" <Barton.Clark@enron.com>, Heather Kroll
<Heather.Kroll@enron.com>
		 cc: "Pasqualini, Martin J." <PASQUAMJ@bingham.com>, "Politan, Nicholas H."
<PolitaNH@bingham.com>
		 Subject: RE: Presentation

Given the time constraint, I thought I'd give you a brief summary of the law
here in Connecticut and some thoughts on how to proceed.

The Connecticut courts and the Freedom of Information Commission (the
"FOIC"), the agency charged with the enforcement of FOIA, have repeatedly
held that CRRA, CDA and DECD are public agencies within the purview of FOIA
(I have not had time to consider whether the same is true for DEP, CPUC and
the other attendees, but suspect that it is so with respect to certain of
them).  FOIA provides, among other things, that all documents obtained or
kept by a public agency are public records available to the public, unless
otherwise exempted from disclosure by special statute or by the exemptions
delineated by FOIA.

While there is no special statute with regard to CRRA, a special statute,
Conn. Gen. Stat. Section 32-11a(k), exempts certain materials and
information submitted to DECD and to CDA from public disclosure.  Section
32-11a(k) states that all information  contained in any application for
financial assistance submitted to DECD or CDA, and all information obtained
by the DECD or CDA with respect to any person or project is exempt from
disclosure under the FOIA.  The statute specifies that this exemption
includes all financial, credit and proprietary information.  I have not had
time to consider whether there are special statutory exemptions provided for
similar information submitted to the other attendees.

Consequently, FOIA governs the confidentiality of all information submitted
to CRRA and, perhaps, certain of the other attendees and the confidentiality
of information submitted to DECD and CDA falling outside Section 32-11a(k)'s
exemption.

As may be pertinent in these circumstances, FOIA exempts from disclosure:
(1) preliminary drafts under certain circumstances, (2) trade secrets and
commercial or financial information given in confidence, and that is not
required by statute to be disclosed to an agency, (3) real estate
appraisals, engineering or feasiblity estimates or evaluations for an agency
relative to the acquisition of property or to prospective public supply and
construction contracts, but only until such time as the property is acquired
or the transaction abandoned, (4) tax returns, reports and statements
exempted by federal law or state statutes, and (5) communications privileged
by the attorney-client relationship.

While the Connecticut courts and FOIC have held that the confidentiality of
information submitted to agencies subject to FOIA is determined by
applicable law rather that the representations or agreements of the parties,
they have suggested that measures designed to preserve confidentiality may
be considered in making that determination.

While your notice cites a May 19, 2000 Agreement of Confidentiality
previously executed by CRRA and Enron (which I have not seen), obviously
that will not be binding upon any attendees not a party to it and, while it
would be better to have the other attendees execute a written agreement
regarding confidentiality, I understand that that may not be practical given
the timing and the number of parties involved.
Accordingly, I recommend that the following other steps be employed with
respect to confidential information submitted to the attendees:

1.  All documents and information submitted to the attendees should be
marked "Preliminary Draft".

2.  In the fourth paragraph of your notice, change clause (1) to read "the
Subject Information is being provided to it in confidence, contains trade
secrets and/or confidential commercial, financial and proprietary
information and other information exempt from disclosure under certain laws
of the State of Connecticut, and it will maintain the confidentiality of the
Subject Information".

3. You should take steps, internally, to ensure the confidentiality of the
information you submit to the agencies.  Appropriate measures would include:
(a) limiting access to confidential information to a "need to know" basis,
(b) entering into confidentiality agreements with others involved in the
project with respect to their studies, analyses, etc., for the project, (c)
advising your personnel (secretarial, etc.), in writing, that the
information is confidential and of the need to maintain such information in
confidence, and (d) maintaining confidential information in locked or
otherwise private files.

5. A request should be made by you to the agencies that confidential
information  be discussed by the agencies in executive session.

If we take these measures with regard to information supplied to the
agencies, we will enhance the likelihood of maintaining the confidentiality
of the information in response to a public request for disclosure of the
information pursuant to the FOIA.  Should you wish to discuss this matter in
more detail, please do not hesitate to call me at (860) 240-2943.

-----Original Message-----
From: Barton Clark [mailto:Barton.Clark@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 4:07 PM
To: Heather Kroll
Cc: silverbc@bingham.com
Subject: Presentation

I suggest adding the attached in as the first page of text in the
presentation
materials and call the attendee's attention to it at the commencement of the
presentation. If there is a problem with its length, I would suggest
deleting
the laundry list of attendees in the first paragraph and the third paragraph
only. Also, I did not have time to check with Conn counsel on the procedures
for
public disclosure in Conn alluded to generally in the fourth paragraph, but
by
copy hereof am requesting they review the language of the Notice and give us
any
comments. When do the materials have to be distributed?

(See attached file: Notice to Recipients of Presentation Materials.doc)


1. I appreciate everyone who participated in the call today.  I think that
the discussion proved that we can find consensus on a reasonable approach for
transmission pricing and energy markets.

2. To make more clear about the Regional Plans, I think that we need to
consider the following.

A. BACKGROUND

Timelines of Current Process
Current Players & Current Positions
Allies
Key Issues now facing the process

B. MOVING FORWARD

Top Issues upcoming
External Factors (e.g., will Entergy join SPP)
Resource Needs
Relationship to Commercial Objectives / Business Plans

C. OTHER ISSUES / CONCLUSION

I hope this helps set an outline for the Regional Plans.  The key idea is
that I want to make sure everyone has a calendar of where we are going and
what issues need to be addressed.  Don't be shy about adding other topics and
issues.  We need to have this to communicate within our group and to the
commercial people.  I don't expect this to be easy, but I think that it will
be helpful.

3. I think that we need to put more detail around the entire structure.  This
would entail developing four things (1) a tariff, (2) ISO Systems &
Procedures, (3) Day Ahead PX Energy Market, (4) Transmission Flowgate PX
Market.  These are the four building blocks to a New Marketplace.

My hope is for Enron to put these things out in a detailed framework using
"off the shelf" material.  I know that Tom Delaney has already started
working on a tariff.  I think we could adapt the Cal PX model into point 3.
We could probably use the APX Flowgate System for point 4.  On the ISO, maybe
we could go to ESCA and have a Detailed Scope / Work Plan and fees on setting
up an ISO (including costs of operation over time).  It would make sense to
me to do this very formally (including setting energy market zones and
defining the commercially significant Flowgates).  I would use the MISO as
the market to focus on, but am willing to listen to other thoughts.

Please let me know what everyone thinks.

Jim


On May 10, 2001, a memo was sent out regarding "Peer Group Mapping".  This mapping is intended to illustrate from a functional view point where each activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

Please refer to the attached original memo, if you have not responded to David Oxley and have any comments
please respond to him by May 25, 2001.

Dave Delainey

Following my note last week please find attached the consolidated peer group mapping for all business units. This mapping is intended to illustrate from a functional view point where each activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

We were considering moving to a 3 Peer Group Structure however it as agreed at the last PRC Committee Meeting  to stay with the current structure since the data had been cleaned and everyone felt generally comfortable where most activities had been placed with the exception of just  2 or 3. It was agreed that we should concentrate on resolving these rather than undertaking an organization wide remapping excercise to consolidate to 3 Peer Groups. All functions/activities within the business units should now be reflected on the acttached.

The actions points from this excercise are:

1	to review and agree the attached mapping

2    consider and comment on highlighted groups that we have discussed in previous PRC meetings and ask for your comments or objections to moving them 	as indicated on the attachment.

3	invite your comments or questions on any other function that you consider questionable or requiring further explanation.

      Please return your comments to David Oxley by Friday May 25.

      To have this discussion now will save lengthy discussions in the final VP/MD PRC Meetings.  Definitions of the peer groups are also attached for your ease of
      reference.


Roman Kosecki

Phone: (973) 733 2771
 (562) 951 1790 (CA)
 (201) 222 0435 (h)

rkosecki@mieco.com


Please find attached the minutes from the April 2nd energy committee
meeting.  I apologize for the delay in distributing these minutes.  If you
have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

 - Energy Committee Meeting Minutes April 2.doc


Jeff -- this is the first in a series of three e-mails all of which
constitute Exhibit 38 of the SDG&E proceeding. Jeanne
-----Original Message-----
From: Hay, James E. [mailto:JHay@sempra.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:30 PM
To: 'JBennett@GMSSR.com'
Subject: FW: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer Testimony
First Email

First Email --

-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett [ mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com <mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com> ]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:14 PM
To: 'Hay, James E.'
Subject: RE: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony First Email

They have not come through yet.  I will let you know.  Thank you.  Jeanne
Bennett

-----Original Message-----
From: Hay, James E. [ mailto:JHay@sempra.com <mailto:JHay@sempra.com> ]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:00 PM
To: 'Jbennett@gmssr.com'
Subject: RE: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer Testimony
First Email

Ms. Bennett, please let me know if you were able to open the files in the
email that I just sent to you.

        This filing is Exhibit 38.  If you are unable to open the files,
please email me and I will send them to you one at a time.  .... Jim Hay

        Jim Hay
Regulatory Project Manager
Sempra Energy
101 Ash Street HQ14B
San Diego, CA 92101-3017
Email - jhay@sempra.com

         Phone - 619-696-2141 Fax - 619-696-4027

         -----Original Message-----
From:   Hay, James E.
Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:57 PM
To:     'Jbennett@gmssr.com'
Subject:        FW: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony  First  Email

         << Message: FW: Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August
15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 >>  << Message: FW: Second E-Mail:
Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15, 2001 in
A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 >>  << Message: FW: Third E-Mail:  Reply of SDG&E to

ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15, 2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044 >>

         -----Original Message-----
From:   Van Wagenen, Lynn G.
Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:33 PM
To:
Cc:     Melville, Keith W.; Hay, James E.
Subject:        FW: A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony

        Jeanne,  I understand from Keith Melville that you were looking for
various pieces of SDG&E's May 18, 2001 filing in our Revenue Shortfall
Surcharge Application (A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044).  I have included in the
attached note the entire SDG&E filing.  Hopefully, you will be able to find
in the package the information/data you are seeking.  Recognize that there
were some corrections made on the stand by some of the witnesses.  I would
recommend that you check the transcript for those corrections.

        Also, Keith tells me you also wanted a copy of Exhibit #38.  Jim Hay

will send it to you in a separate e-mail.

        Please let us know, if you need further documents in this
proceeding.  Have a great day!

         Lynn G, Van Wagenen
Lynn G. Van Wagenen
Sempra Energy - San Diego
Regulatory Case Management
(619) 696-4055   FAX - Ext. 4027
E-Mail:  LVanWagenen@sempra.com

        -----Original Message-----
From:   Evans, Darleen
Sent:   Friday, May 18, 2001 4:35 PM
To:     bfinkelstein@turn.org; bishop@jrwood.com; Brill, Thomas;
bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; chiefskip@aol.com; christine.costa@sce.com; cjw5@pge.com;
cwrmccv@worldnet.att.net; cxw@cpuc.ca.gov;
DavoodiKR@efaches.navfac.navy.mil; dlf@cpuc.ca.gov;
douglass@arterhadden.com; dpritchard@mofo.com; DVRONROCK@ADPLAW.COM;
edf@cpuc.ca.gov; ek@a-klaw.com; epoole@adplaw.com; fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov;
freedman@turn.org; furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; jbennett@gmssr.com;
jguzman@nossaman.com; jleslie@luce.com; jmalkin@orrick.com;
jsqueri@gmssr.com; jtachera@energy.state.ca.us; jweil@aglet.org;
mbrubaker@consultbai.com; mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com; Melville, Keith;
mjaske@energy.state.ca.us; mshames@ucan.org; msw@cpuc.ca.gov;
mv1@cpuc.ca.gov; pbray@newpower.com; raw@cpuc.ca.gov;
riald@kindermorgan.com; rliebert@cfbf.com; rmccann@cal.net; sfc@cpuc.ca.gov;

sro@cpuc.ca.gov; ssmyers@worldnet.att.net; tknox@klalawfirm.com;
tsmegal@calwater.com; uwuaregion5@earthlink.net

        Cc:     Croyle, David; Derbas, Mohamed; Evans, Darleen; Fong, Ed;
Hansen, Douglas; Resley, Robert; Rossi, Rosalinda; Saxe, William; Schavrien,

Lee; Schneider, Michael; Swanson, Rich

        Subject:        A.01-01-044 SDG&E's Updated/Rebuttal/Small Customer
Testimony

        TESTIMONY:

         << File: A.01-01-044 Croyle PD(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044
Croyle Rebuttal(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Croyle Updated PDT(v1).DOC
>>  << File: A.01-01-044 Derbas Rebuttal(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044
Derbas PD(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Derbas Updated PDT(v1).DOC >>  <<

File: A.01-01-044 Fong Updated PDT(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Fong
Rebuttal(v1).DOC >>  << File: A.01-01-044 Fong PD(v1).DOC >>

        _____________________________
ATTACHMENTS/TABLES:

         << File: Bill Impacts (large).xls >>  << File: Bill Impacts
(small).xls >>  << File: SDGE.RD.Template5-18(Large) DecisionTemp1.XLS >>
<< File: SDGE.RD.Template5-18(Large)FINAL Update2.XLS >>  << File:
SDGE.RD.Template5-18(SMALL)DecisionTemp1.xls >>  << File:
SDGE.RD.Template5-18(SMALL)FINAL1.xls >>

        __________________________________

        Darleen Evans

        Sempra Energy - Law Department

        619-699-5056

        devans@sempra.com

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <JHay@sempra.com>
To: Van Wagenen, Lynn G. <LVanWagenen@sempra.com>
Date: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:41:53 GMT
Subject:

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Hay, James E.
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 9:24 AM
To:     Reed, Debra L.
Subject:        FW: Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15,
2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044

I will add you to next emails.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Hay, James E.
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 9:21 AM
To:     Parrott, Jeff; Trace, Jeffrey; Melville, Keith W.; Deremer, Kenneth;
Schavrien, Lee; Savage, Marie; Schneider, Michael M.; Strong, Michael G.;
Derbas, Mohamed; Szymanski, Paul; Swanson, Rich; Resley, Robert J.; Jack,
Stephen J.; Rahon, Steve; Garcia, Sue E.; Weinmeister, Sue; Roberts, Ted;
Farrelly, Terry C.; Brill, Thomas R.; Saxe, William; Kline, Doug; Farmer,
Laura; Larson, Art; Fair, Pam; Avery, James; Overturf, Billie J.; John, Fred
E.; Reed, William

Subject:        FW: Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15,
2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044

Attached is the first of three emails with SDG&E's filing  updating the DWR
revenue requirements.   The following is an excerpt from our pleading.  In
the next email are scenarios that show DWR surcharge (cents per kWh for
system, large customers, and small customers)  under assumptions requested
by the ALJ.

Thanks especially to Ed Fong, Mohamed Derbas, Bill Saxe, Mike Strong, Keith
Melville, and Jeff Parrot for key assistance in getting this filing out in
one-day.

Based on this filing,  the Commission may (we have no Proposed Decision yet)
rule as soon as August 23 on an increase to SDG&E rates of approximately
3-cents to recover the updated DWR revenue requirements.

If you have questions, please contact me, Lynn Van Wagenen, or Keith
Melville.

Excerpt of SDG&E pleading:

	On August 15, 2001, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Wetzell issued an
"ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING ON THE AUGUST 7, 2001 REVENUE REQUIREMENT
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES" directing San Diego Gas & Electric
Company (SDG&E) to produce updated estimates, including supporting analyses,
of the system average electric rate increases required based on the revised
revenue requirements determined by the Department of Water Resources' (DWR),
as set forth in the August 7, 2001 DWR communication to the California
Public Utilities Commission.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Hay, James E.
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 9:00 AM
To:     Mueller, Michelle; Fong, Ed; Schavrien, Lee; Melville, Keith W.
Subject:        FW: Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15,
2001 in A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044

This email contains the pleading, assumptions, and a summary.  The summary
is the accurate updated version.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Ruiz, Annie
Sent:   Friday, August 17, 2001 8:31 AM
To:     ayk@cpuc.ca.gov; bfinkelstein@turn.org; bishop@jrwood.com; Brill,
Thomas; bsl@cpuc.ca.gov; chiefskip@aol.com; christine.costa@sce.com;
cjw5@pge.com; cwrmccv@worldnet.att.net; DavoodiKR@efaches.navfac.navy.mil;
dlf@cpuc.ca.gov; douglass@energyattorney.com; DVRONROCK@ADPLAW.COM;
edf@cpuc.ca.gov; ek@a-klaw.com; epoole@adplaw.com; fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov;
freedman@turn.org; furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; jbennett@gmssr.com;
jguzman@nossaman.com; jleslie@luce.com; jmalkin@orrick.com;
jsqueri@gmssr.com; jtachera@energy.state.ca.us; jweil@aglet.org;
mbrubaker@consultbai.com; mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com; Melville, Keith;
mjaske@energy.state.ca.us; mshames@ucan.org; msw@cpuc.ca.gov;
mv1@cpuc.ca.gov; mzr@cpuc.ca.gov; pbray@newpower.com; raw@cpuc.ca.gov;
rax@cpuc.ca.gov; riald@kindermorgan.com; rliebert@cfbf.com; sfc@cpuc.ca.gov;
sro@cpuc.ca.gov; ssmyers@worldnet.att.net; tknox@klalawfirm.com;
tsmegal@calwater.com; uwuaregion5@earthlink.net

Cc:     Hay, James E.
Subject:        Reply of SDG&E to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling of August 15, 2001 in
A.00-10-045/A.01-01-044

This and the following two e-mails contain the updated information requested
by ALJ Wetzell in his Ruling dated August 15, 2001.  The documents are
spread out over three e-mails because they consist primarily of
spreadsheets.   In this first e-mail SDG&E attaches its pleading responding
to ALJ Wetzell's Ruling along with two documents providing the assumptions
SDG&E used for its updates to Exhibits 14 and 18 and  a document providing a
summary of all of SDG&E's updated analyses.  In the second e-mail SDG&E will
provide its updates to Exhibit 14 and in the third e-mail SDG&E will provide
its updates to Exhibit 18.

Annie Ruiz

Assistant to Jeffrey M. Parrott

Sempra Energy Law Department  HQ-13

Tel: 619-696-4903  Fax: 619-699-5027

E-mail: aruiz@sempra.com

<<SDG&E Reply re Wetzel(v1).DOC>> <<Exhibit 14 Assumptions.doc>>
<<Exhibit 18 Assumptions.doc>>

Updated summary.    <<DWR Rate Increase Summary.xls>>


let's go party.   we can get a group and go get some food and then hit the
bars.  tim was supposed to send an email out, but i don't think he has yet.
i am up for whatever.


Good Morning Stacey,

Jeff Richter wants to start trading ancillary service deals through EOL.  To help facilitate this new business, we need to setup several new pub codes that represent the indexes the California ISO publishes for ancillary services.  A few of the ancillary pub codes are already setup we just need to add the ones for spin & non-spin.  Do you know who we need to get with to have these new pub codes setup?  I will work with the IT guys to ensure the programs that scrape the ISO site and store the prices are updated to capture these new indexes.

Thanks,  David Poston

ps - Please give me a call if you have any questions, 57834

These pub codes already exist:

ISOGRRNP15	(CAL ISO GENERATION REPLACEMENT RESERVE @ NP-15)
ISOLRRNP15	(CAL ISO LOAD REPLACEMENT RESERVE @ NP-15)

Repeat for SP-15

Repeat for ZP-26

These pub codes need to be created:

ISOGSRNP15	(CAL ISO GENERATION SPINNING RESERVE @ NP-15)
ISOLSRNP15	(CAL ISO LOAD REPLACEMENT RESERVE @ NP-15)

Repeat for SP-15

Repeat for ZP-26

ISOGNRNP15	(CAL ISO GENERATION NON-SPINNING RESERVE @ NP-15)
ISOLNRNP15	(CAL ISO LOAD NON-SPINNING RESERVE @ NP-15

Repeat for SP-15

Repeat for ZP-26


Yes I did!

Mr. & Mrs. James Rogers
6 Noel Lane
Cincinnati, OH  45243


Richard,

Attached please find two spreadsheets.

One reflects the sales and purchases filed for years 2000 and 2001 and the other provides the checks received from the CEC.

If you have any questions, please let me know.  Also, please let me know what else I may help you with.

Thanks,
Mary


When: Monday, October 22, 2001 3:30 PM-4:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB38C2

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please note new time and location.


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 08/16/2000 08:36
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     08/16/2000 08:16 AM

To: "Leopold, Jason" <Jason.Leopold@dowjones.com>
cc:  (bcc: Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT)
Subject: DJ Calif ISO Exceeded $250 Cap In Off-system Buys -Sources

15:13 GMT 16 August 2000 DJ Calif ISO Exceeded $250 Cap In Off-system Buys
-Sources
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--The California Independent System Operator had to pay
more than its stated maximum price of $250 a megawatt-hour this week due to
short supplies of electricity in the western U.S. amid high air-conditioning
demand, according to market sources.
Under its price cap rules, the ISO is allowed to exceed its cap in
"out-of-market" purchases, which is when it purchases power in deals
arranged directly with sellers over the phone, rather than through its usual
computer-based purchasing system. The current cap was lowered to $250/MWh
from $500/MWh starting August 7.
The ISO wouldn't confirm that it had to pay more than $250 Monday.
"We're not going to reveal whether this is happening, or at what price,"
spokeswoman Stephanie McCorkel told Dow Jones Newswires. "For the sake of
protecting consumers, we will keep our price strategy confidiential. But any
out-of-market purchase above the cap is very rare."
On Sunday, the ISO agreed to pay about $350/MWh at Palo Verde to a southwest
utility for on-peak Monday power, according to a trader for the utility, who
spoke on the condition of anonymity. Bilateral trades not involving the ISO
were done as high as $375/MWh Monday afternoon in the real-time market.
Other market sources said that the ISO exceeded its cap again Tuesday
afternoon, when several major California generating units were be taken off
line for unplanned repairs, and the real-time market rose to $500/MWh for
one hour at Palo Verde. Those purchases couldn't be confirmed with sellers.
According to its price cap rule, "Such reduced cap shall not apply to
out-of-market calls placed by management to out-of-state generator
resources."
Some market participants say that regular out-of-market purchases above
$250/MWh could persuade suppliers to not offer power to the ISO via its
computer-based system, which has plateaued at $250/MWh for most of both
Monday and Tuesday afternoons.
And owners of generating stations in California say there is no
justification for giving preferential treatment to out-of-state generators.
-Mark Golden; Dow Jones Newswires 201-938-4604;
mark.golden@dowjones.com
Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.

 <<Gunther Pergher (E-mail).vcf>>
 - Gunther Pergher (E-mail).vcf


Guys:
Don Miller and I would like to set some time up with you, today if possible,
to talk about state and local tax issues for the 2000 peakers.  I will talk
with Don about a good time to meet and let you know.  But let me know what is
a good time for you this afternoon.  Thanks for your time.
Ben
3-7998


Please handle
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/01/99
09:39 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Bob Carter                           11/29/99 05:23 PM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Document Retention Policy

The folks at East Coast Power inquired as to what is our document retention
policy.  I understand it to be 6 months.  Is that still the case?  Is there a
written statement of the policy that I can send to them?

I told them that the 6 month rule is a general rule, and would, of course, be
subject to exceptions for any statutory, regulatory or contractual obligation
to keep certain docuemtns for longer periods.  I also suggested to them that
all docuemntation necessary to prove up the QF status of the plants should be
keep for a substantially longer period, at least for the relevant limitations
periods.  Do you agree?


these are neat.
regards.  scott.

FIVE GREAT LESSONS:

1 -   Most Important Lesson - During my second month of nursing school, our
professor gave us a pop quiz. I was a conscientious student and had breezed
through the questions,until I read the last one: "What is the first name of
the woman who cleans the school?" Surely this was some kind of joke. I had
seen the cleaning woman several times.  She was tall, dark-haired and in her
50s, but how would I know her name?  I handed in my paper, leaving the last
question blank. Just before class ended, one student asked if the last
question would count toward our quiz grade. "Absolutely," said the professor.
"In your careers, you will meet many people. All are significant. They
deserve your attention and care, even if all you do is smile and say
'hello'." "I've never forgotten that lesson.  I also learned her name was
Dorothy.

2 - Second Important Lesson - Pickup in the Rain. One night, at 11:30 PM, an
older African American woman was standing on the side of an Alabama highway
trying to endure a lashing rain storm. Her car had broken down and she
desperately needed a ride. Soaking wet, she decided to flag down the next
car.  A young white man stopped to help her, generally unheard of in those
conflict-filled 1960s. The man took her to safety, helped her get assistance
and put her into a taxi cab. She seemed to be in a big hurry, but wrote down
his address and thanked him. Seven days went by and a knock came on the man's
door. To his surprise, a giant console color TV was delivered to his home. A
special note was attached. It read: "Thank you so much for assisting me on
the highway the other night. The rain drenched not only my
clothes, but also my spirits. Then you came along. Because of you, I was able
to make it to my dying husband's bedside just before he passed away.  God
bless you for helping me and unselfishly serving others." Sincerely, Mrs. Nat
King  Cole.

3 - Third Important Lesson - Always remember those who serve. In the days
when an ice cream sundae cost much less, a 10 year old boy entered a hotel
coffee shop and sat at a table.  A waitress put a glass of water in front of
him.
"How much is an ice cream sundae?" he asked. "Fifty cents," replied the
waitress. The little boy pulled his hand out of his pocket and studied the
coins in it. "Well, how much is a plain dish of ice cream?" he inquired. By
now more people were waiting for a table and the waitress was growing
impatient. "Thirty-five cents," she brusquely replied." The little boy again
counted his coins.  "I'll have the plain ice cream," he said.  The waitress
brought the ice cream, put the bill on the table and walked away. The boy
finished the ice cream, paid the cashier and left. When the waitress came
back, she began to cry as she wiped down the table. There, placed neatly
beside the empty dish, were two nickels and five pennies - You see, he
couldn't have the sundae, because he had to have enough left to leave her a
tip.

4 -  Fourth Important Lesson - The Obstacle in Our Path. In ancient times, a
King had a boulder placed on a roadway. then he hid himself and watched to
see if anyone would remove the huge rock. Some of the king's wealthiest
merchants and courtiers came by and simply walked around it.  Many loudly
blamed the king for not keeping the roads clear, but none did anything about
getting the stone out of the way. Then a peasant came along carrying a load
of vegetables. Upon
approaching the boulder, the peasant laid down his burden and tried to move
the stone to the side of the road. After much pushing and straining, he
finally succeeded.  After the peasant picked up his load of vegetables, he
noticed a purse lying in the road where the boulder had been. The purse
contained many gold coins and a note from the king  indicating that the gold
was for the person who removed the boulder from the roadway. The peasant
learned what many of us never understand. Every obstacle presents an
opportunity to improve our condition.

5 - Fifth Important Lesson - Giving When it Counts. Many years ago, when I
worked as a volunteer at a hospital, I got to know a little girl named Liz
who was suffering from a rare and serious disease. Her only chance of
recovery appeared to be a blood transfusion from her 5-year old brother, who
had miraculously survived the same disease and had developed the antibodies
needed to combat the illness. The doctor explained the situation to her
little brother, and asked the little boy if he would be willing to give his
blood to his sister. I saw him hesitate for only a moment before taking a
deep breath and saying, "Yes, I'll do it if it will save her." As the
transfusion progressed, he lay in bed next to his sister and smiled, as we
all did, seeing the color returning to her cheeks. Then his face grew pale
and his smile  faded. He looked up at the doctor and asked with a trembling
voice, "Will I start to die right away?" Being young, the little boy had
misunderstood the doctor; he thought he was going to have to give his sister
all of his blood in order to save her. You see, after all, understanding and
attitude, are everything.


test message


David,

I am leaving for vacation this weekend and I haven't received the copy of
your presentation yet.
The window during which I could make changes to my presentation is closing
very fast. Let's
do the following: I shall keep my presentation as is (this means that I shall
use the copy of my
presentation I sent to Dawn Scovill  and you this week). If there is an
overlap between our presentations, so be it.

Dawn, please use the copy of my presentation I sent you earlier this week.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/17/2000
04:33 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
03/16/2000 08:02 AM
To: "Dawn Scovill" <dawn@perfectmeeting.com> @ ENRON
cc: sobotkad@kochind.com, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Presentation

Dawn,

I met David Sobotka from Koch this morning and we talked about  coordinating
our presentations.
This means there will be changes intended to avoid overlaps. Sorry for that.
The portions of my presentation
will survive (those about valuation paradigms) and I shall add a few more
pages on accounting treatment of weather derivatives
plus more specific examples. David will cover primarily market evolution +
plus examples of some
standard structures, and we shall both give more interesting examples of
specific deals executed by our companies.

I shall send you an updated version of my part next week. Let me know what
the deadline is.

Vince

"Dawn Scovill" <dawn@perfectmeeting.com> on 03/14/2000 07:53:47 AM
To: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Presentation

Thanks -- would you like me to include these in the conference book? or do
you anticipate changes?

Dawn
************************************************
FROM:  Dawn Scovill, Conference Coordinator
"Powerful New Ideas 2000"
dawn@perfectmeeting.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Vince J Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: <dawn@perfectmeeting.com>
Cc: Shirley Crenshaw <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>; Vince J Kaminski
<Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; Vince J Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 1:56 PM
Subject: Presentation

>
>
> Dawn,
>
> I am sending you an electronic version of my presentation.
>
> Vince Kaminski
>
> (See attached file: fpl0400.ppt)
>


Jim:
It was a pleasure speaking with you on Wednesday.  Based on our conversation,
this email includes the following:

An Enron contact to discuss developing small-scale generation on Tribal lands.

Our views on the impediments to distributed generation and suggestions on how
to remove those impediments.

A description of the credit issues that continue to impede DWR,s ability to
sign contracts with power suppliers, and options to resolve them. Two
possible options for addressing the credit issue are 1) a California PUC
order clarifying that DWR will recover its power purchase costs through
rates, and 2) an amendment to AB1X designed to accomplish the same goal.  I
have attached talking points regarding the California PUC order and proposed
amendments to AB1X.  We believe that an amendment to AB1X is the preferable
option.

Our assessment of the supply/demand picture in California.

Our suggestions for a legislative package designed to solve both the near-
and long-term electricity crisis in California.  We will deliver to your
office today detailed legislative language.  In those materials we will also
identify existing bills that we believe can easily accommodate our proposed
language.

I hope that the information is useful.  Please do not hesitate to contact me
if you would like to discuss these materials further, or if there is anything
else that I can do to assist you.

Regards,
Ken Lay

Contact Information to Discuss Interest Expressed by Native American Tribes
in Installing Small-scale Generation on Tribal Lands

David Parquet, Vice-President
Enron North America
101 California Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 415.782.7820
Fax: 415.782.7851

2. Key Barriers to Distributed Generation

Excessive and Unnecessary Utility Stand-by Charges

Solution: The executive orders issued by the Governor on February 14th took a
step in the right direction.  Utility stand-by charges have always been
designed by the utilities to protect their monopoly position, extract
monopoly prices from customers, or both.  But there is no reason to limit the
elimination of these charges to generation facilities that are less than
1MW.  These limits will only lengthen unnecessarily the time it takes for
California to close the significant gap between supply and demand and reduce
the risk of black outs this summer.  We would propose lifting the cap by
offering amendments to SB27X, which is designed to facilitate development of
distributed generation.

Excessive delays and costs related to interconnecting facilities with
investor-owned and municipal utilities

Solution:   The Governor,s executive order regarding interconnection is a
step in the right direction*D-D-26-01 requires utilities to complete
interconnection studies within 7 days.  California should ensure that this
requirement applies to all generation facilities, including distributed
generation.  In addition, the financial conflicts the utilities face when
interconnecting generation facilities are simply too powerful to overcome
through executive orders or other regulations.  To the greatest extent
possible, California should shift control over interconnection away from the
utility and place that control with the California ISO.  This could be
accomplished through amendments to SB 27X.

Permitting and Air Quality Issues
Developers of distributed (i.e., &on-site8) generation that is 50 MWs or
greater must receive certification from the California Energy Commission and
therefore face all of the impediments to development that large-scale
generation faces.

Solution: California should ensure that the executive orders (D-22-01 thru
D-26-01) issued by the Governor to expedite plant siting and maximize plant
output apply equally to smaller scale, &distributed generation8 facilities.
In addition, distributed generation that is less than 50 MWs continues to
face local opposition.  The State should ensure that local, parochial
interests cannot block otherwise beneficial distributed generation projects.
These objectives could be accomplished through amendments to SB27X.

3. Credit Concerns Regarding Authority Granted to DWR in AB1X to Purchase
Electricity on Behalf of the Utilities

Enron responded to the RFP issued by DWR to enter into power contracts with
suppliers.
Enron is in active discussions with DWR to establish contract terms with the
goal of entering into a power purchase agreement as soon as possible.
However, ambiguities contained in AB1X have created significant credit risk
concerns that need to be resolved in order to finalize contract terms.
We understand that the lion,s share of counterparties share Enron,s credit
risk concerns.
Enron has proposed several options for resolving the credit risk issues and
is working with DWR to arrive at a solution that is mutually agreeable to
both sides and that might serve as a template for power purchase agreements
going forward.

Summary of the Source of the Credit Risk Issue

Ambiguous Ratemaking Authority
The language in AB1X is ambiguous as to whether DWR has any authority to
charge California ratepayers for the costs of purchasing power.  From our
analysis of the bill, the language in AB1X appears to leave intact the
California PUC,s exclusive jurisdiction over ratemaking in California.  As
such, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree to include in rates
adequate charges to cover DWR,s costs of power purchases.

Ambiguous Regulatory Authority Regarding Contract &Prudence8
The language in AB1X leaves open the possibility that the California Public
Utilities Commission could determine that power purchases made by DWR are
&imprudent.8  On the basis of such a finding, the CPUC could then refuse to
allow DWR to collect from ratepayers the costs associated with its power
purchases.  Consequently, suppliers have no assurance that the PUC will agree
to include in rates the charges to cover the costs of power contracts that
DWR has entered into with suppliers.

Ambiguous Language Regarding the Ratemaking Mechanism that Will Be Used to
Recover DWR,s Costs of Power Purchases
In addition to the ambiguity regarding ratemaking and regulatory authority
noted above, the language in the bill is equally ambiguous with respect to
the specific ratemaking &mechanics8 that AB1X directs the PUC to employ to
permit DWR to recover its power purchase costs. Based on our analysis, it is
extremely difficult to determine how the PUC would design the rates to ensure
DWR recovers its power purchase costs.  Moreover, as currently drafted, it is
difficult to determine whether AB1X would even permit the PUC to include in
rates all of the charges necessary to fully recover DWR,s power purchase
costs.  Again, this ambiguity raises significant credit risk concerns since
suppliers have little assurance that DWR will have the ability to recover
from ratepayers the costs of purchasing power.

Options to Resolve Concerns Regarding Credit Risk

We have been working diligently with DWR officials to resolve the credit risk
issues.  We have identified three options:

Amend AB1X
The amendments, which are attached to this email, would clarify that a) the
PUC would accept as &prudent and reasonable8 all purchase costs incurred by
DWR, and b) the PUC is obligated to include in rates the charges necessary to
ensure that DWR fully recovers its costs of power purchases.  This is the
preferred option, though we understand that the there may be some political
challenges standing in the way of amending AB1X.  (See attached file
entitled, &AmendAB1X.doc8.)

Clarify the Ambiguities in AB1X through an Order Issued by the PUC, and
through Contract Language
This is the option that we are currently working with DWR officials to
implement.  However, it is more complicated and could take significantly more
time to implement than the "legislative" fix.  We have attached electronic
copies of the talking points related to the order that the California PUC
would need to issue under this option.  (See attached file entitled,
&cpuctalkingpoints.doc.8)

Make Use of Other Instruments Designed to Address Credit Risk
As indicated in our letter responding to DWR,s RFP, we are willing to accept
other forms of credit from DWR.  Those options include a letter of credit,
cash prepayment, or an acceptable form of collateral.  DWR officials have
indicated to us that DWR prefers to pursue the second options. That is, DWR
prefers to clarify the ambiguities in AB1X through a PUC order and through
contract amendments.

4. California,s Supply-demand Picture Heading into Summer 2001

Both the California Energy Commission and Cambridge Energy Research
Associates (CERA), a private sector energy think tank, have issued reports
showing that California faces a severe supply-demand imbalance.  They differ
only on how much and how soon additional supply will be made available.  All
credible sources agree that supply will be very tight throughout the Summer
of 2001 and that unless a solution is found immediately, blackouts are
likely.

CEC and CERA both forecast that California will be short of supply this
summer by approximately 5,000 MW.   These numbers are in line with our
estimates.  California,s supply base currently has a 6% capacity margin, well
below the average 15-20%, which is recommended for reliable system operation
in the West.  Since the West relies more heavily upon hydroelectric power
than other regions, reserves are particularly important, owing to the
unpredictability of the weather and the dry year the West has experienced to
date. In the event of a low rain and snow period, the system must possess the
flexibility to respond to the reduced availability of power supply.
California,s very low reserve margin makes it especially susceptible to this
requirement.

Other reasons for reduced supply for the Summer of 2001 include the early
draw-down of reservoirs in the continual effort to manage California's severe
supply-demand gap; emissions restrictions on existing plants; and a reduced
number of customers who can be curtailed under their contracts with the
utilities.  Cambridge Energy Research Associates asserts that at the current
pace of siting, permitting and construction, adequate supplies will not be
added to correct the market imbalance until 2003 at the earliest.

CERA predicts that California is likely to face approximately 20 hours of
rolling black outs this summer.  The CEC paints a considerably more
optimistic scenario, betting that California will bring an additional 5,000
MWs on line to meet peaking summer demand.  It is our view that California
should view the CEC's "rosy scenario" with considerable skepticism.

5. Suggested Package of Legislative Proposals Designed to Solve California,s
Electricity Crisis

This email offers an overview of our proposed legislative solution.  We will
deliver to your office tomorrow specific legislative language and existing
bills that we believe can accommodate our proposals.

As we have suggested throughout the crisis, any solution to California's
crisis must focus on four issues:

Increase supply
Decrease demand
Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market
Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency

Increase supply--Legislative vehicle: SB28X (Sher)
To site and construct a power plant in Texas takes approximately 2 years.
Enron and others have completed the entire process in other states in less
than a year.  In California, it takes about six years, or longer.

The Governor,s executive orders and Senator Sher,s siting reform legislation
are steps in the right direction.  Our suggested amendments can improve those
efforts by further addressing the difficulties that project developers face
in securing air emission reduction credits to meet the air permit
requirements included in the CEC's certification requirements.  Enron,s
proposal seeks to streamline the process for 1) obtaining credits and 2)
transfering credits between air districts.  In addition, it creates an
innovative emissions reduction bank to allow project sponsors to fund
emissions in advance of obtaining certification, and permits the affected air
districts to use those funds to finance projects that will produce the
required reductions in pollution emissions.

Decrease demand*Legislative Vehicle:   AB31X (Wright)
Because of the delay in getting a solution in place in California, closing
the supply-demand gap through energy conservation and efficiency offers the
best chance of avoiding blackouts this summer.  This can be accomplished most
effectively and quickly in two ways:

Buy-down demand
California is tapping into an enormous amount of money from the General Fund
to finance DWR,s power purchases.  California could likely reduce demand more
economically by running an auction to determine the payments businesses would
be willing to receive to reduce their demand for a sustained period (e.g.,
through the summer months).  DWR could easily run an on-line auction to
determine the price it could pay for these demand reductions.  To
participate, businesses would be required to have the metering equipment
necessary to monitor and verify that they are actually achieving the
reductions.  Enron has developed an on-line auction software package, &Deal
Bench,8 that it would be willing to contribute to the effort.

Use Price Signals to Incent Voluntary Curtailment
To be successful, customers need access to the following key elements:

An internet based hour-ahead price posting system to track the market price
for hour-ahead power in real time.
Real-time metering systems for baseline demand and voluntarily curtailment
verification.
Settlement process that allows for market clearing prices of energy to be
paid for load reduction (&Negawatts8).

The potential benefits of an effective demand response program would include:

&creation8 of additional summer peaking capacity in California, particularly
in the short term, without requiring construction of additional generation
resources.
reduction of  peak or super-peak load on the over-stressed California
electric system, thus potentially reducing the overall cost of electricity in
the state.
fostering of demand elasticity without subjecting customers to the full risk
of hourly market price volatility by passing market price signals to
customers and allowing them to voluntarily shed load and be compensated for
responding.

We estimate that we could generate a summer 2001 on-peak demand response in
excess of 400 MW during certain high cost hours, and a demand response for
summer 2002 on-peak hours that could exceed 1000 MW.  We further estimate
that the market response to this program from all ESPs could be 2 to 3 times
that amount.  We recommend that the State of California provide rebates
directly to customers to fund the installation of advanced metering and
control systems that would support load curtailment implementation.

Establish a truly competitive retail electricity market*Legislative vehicle:
SB27X
The only customers who were protected from price volatility in San Diego were
customers who chose Direct Access and signed fixed price deals with energy
service providers.  Ironically, AB1X takes that important option away from
customers and businesses.  It is critical that AB1X be amended to remove the
prohibition against Direct Access.

Enron's legislative proposal would give customers freedom to enter into a
direct access transaction, while simultaneously addressing the Department of
Water Resources' concerns about stranded power costs that might result from
customer migration.

In addition, California will only achieve a competitive retail market when
the utility is removed completely from the procurement function.  Procurement
is not a utility core competency, as evidenced by the dire financial
condition in which the utilities now find themselves.  California should
therefore begin immediately to phase the utility out of the procurement
function entirely, with the goal of having all customers served by a
non-utility provider within 36 months.  To execute the transition, California
should hold a series of competitive solicitations over the 36-month period in
which competing service providers would bid for the right to serve segments
of utility load.

Return California,s Investor-owned utilities to solvency*Legislative vehicle:
AB18X
Utility bankruptcy will not increase supply and it will not decrease demand.
In short, bankruptcy does nothing to solve California,s supply-demand
imbalance.  In addition, bankruptcy increases the likelihood that consumers
and businesses will bear the significant financial risks of having California
State government assume the role of &electricity buyer8 for an extended
period of time.  Finally, bankruptcy will undermine both investor confidence
in California's energy markets and the private sector's willingness to
participate in that market.

California can return the utilities to financial solvency by implementing a
series of staged rate increases.  California should design those rate
increases with the dual goal of returning the utilities to solvency without
&shocking8 the economy or household budgets For example, California could
amortize the recovery of the utilities, past debt over a 5-10 year period.
In addition, the magnitude of the rate increase can be reduced in two ways:
First, the utilities could absorb some portion of their existing debt in
recognition of the risk they accepted when they agreed to the structure of AB
1890.  Second, California can &net8 the revenues the utilities have received
from selling electricity into the Power Exchange against the debts they have
accrued due to the retail price cap.


[IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      Get your game on with NFL playoff  football at the world's most interactive venue for sportsbetting...   10%  Bonus for all new players!  Licensed and Regulated in North  America   Sports  Interaction   offers you the security and peace of mind of betting on NFL football with a world leader.  You can bet online  instantly with your credit card, using the currency of your choice.  Try  it now!    [IMAGE]  SUPERBOWL  XXXVI    New England vs.  St.Louis   [IMAGE]   >> Click  here to bet on the NFL Playoffs!   <<  View the latest betting information, place bets and transfer funds  to and from your account, all from the convenience of your PC,  24 hours a day.  Get 24-hour online access through the Internet, 24-hour customer  service and the world's easiest to use Internet betting system.  And with our easy $20 minimum deposit - $1 minimum bet system,  anyone can get in on the action, anytime. Click  Here To Start Betting Today!    [IMAGE]  Receive  your 10% Bonus click here!

[IMAGE]==================================================================
This email is not sent unsolicited. This is a CoOpt Network mailing!
This message is sent to subscribers ONLY.
The e-mail subscription address is: pmims@enron.com
To unsubscribe please click here
or
Send an email with your email address as the subject
to  remove@coopt.com
===================================================================


It seems that PNM is charging an unreasonable amount for losses.  Is there any way we could address this.

Thanks,
Holden

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Virginia
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:43 PM
To:	Salisbury, Holden
Cc:	Fischer, Mark; Alonso, Tom
Subject:	PUD New Mexico ancillary charges

Guys-

   FYI  --  Public Service Company of New Mexico charges ancillary as follows:

  Schedule 1    Scheduling, System Control, and Dispatch Services -  $0.047 per MWh
  Schedule 2    Reactive Supply and Voltage Control - $0.066 per MWh
  Schedule 9    Loss Compensation Service - $3.00 per MWh.  This $3 is based on a $100 market price x 3%.  I have disputed this charge, arguing that the market (and as you mentioned the Cap) is well below $100.00.  I should be hearing from them soon and I will let you know when I do.  That could bring down  your total ancillary cost from July 2001 going forward.
  New Mexico Gross Receipts Tax - 5.75% of gross charges for the month.  This taxes applied to all schedules that remain within New Mexico. )For   example from Four Corners to San Juan).

Attached is a spreadsheet outlining this month's charges as of today (not accounting for any changes that may come in response to my dispute).

Let me know if you have any questions.

Virginia


I strongly disagree

"If it is impossible to reach an agreement within ABRADEE",, then we should
be loud an clear in expressing our own view, to all levels of government
including a position paper to  Pedro Parente asap.  Caps at this point in
time may jeopardize the rationing plan per se. We had a victory in anchoring
the penalties to the MAE price. Why surrender it now?

Why do we have to abide by ABRADEE's desires?

This is not a religious issue only.  There are a few US$ million left on the
table.

How many US$ million are on the table for Enron?

 - Ballpark, possibly  US$20f or Elektro's long position  (60 in EBITDA *
(680-460)/680)
 - A lot, lot more for Eletrobolt (perhaps to the point of killing the
project, as Joao Albuquerque stated)

Are we being consistent? About a week ago, we submitted our views to ANEEL,
on Public Hearing 02/2001, advocating for an increase in the cost of defict
to US$ 2350/MWh. The trading group (Remi, David) were adamant about this
position submitted by Regulatory Affairs (I think they are right)

Are we acting to the best interest of our shareholders?

LM

Joao Carlos Albuquerque
05/20/2001 11:40 AM
To: jmazon@elektro.com.br, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Sergio
Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Britaldo Soares/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: CAP no MAE

Algumas empresas de distribui??o short em 02 e 03 est?o defendendo fortememte
CAP no MAE,  bem abaixo do custo do d,ficit ( cerca de R$ 680). ( CERJ,
Cataguases, LIght est? em cima do muro, etc...)

Se for inevit?vel, nossa posi??o deve ser:

 - N?O PODE SER INFERIOR AO PRE_O PRATICADO NO PRE-RACIONAMENTO ( R$ 460,00 )
 - N?O PODE SER INFERIOR ? MAIOR TARIFA COBRADA DOS CONSUMIDORES  ( TROS
VEZES A TARIFA RESIDENCIAL  ATUAL - 200% SOBRE A MESMA, PARA CONSUMOS ACIMA
DE 500 KWh POR MOS) .

Mazzon, calcule a ordem de grandeza deste valor. _ importante termos isto em
mente quando formos falar com as autoridades amanh? e, em especial com Mauro
Arce.

Lembrar, ainda, que um CAP baixo, sem FLOOR, pode matar ELETROBOLT, uma vez
que as receitas que esta auferiria em 2002 n?o compensariam o decr,scimo das
mesmas de 2003 em diante, quando, com a redu??o de mercado devido ao
racionamento e o aumento de entrada de novas fontes de gera??o, tamb,m
incentivada pelo racionamento, poder? derrubar fortemente os pre?os do MAE.
N?o devemos nos esquecer que o per?odo de amortiza??o de ELETROBOLT , de
cinco anos.

Jo?o Carlos


College Station, TX (AP) - R.C. Slocum and the Texas A&M Aggies are
demanding a recount of the game in which Oklahoma won 35 to 31.
"The end zones were confusing," says Slocum.  "I'm sure that some of the
touchdowns that went in Oklahoma's end zone were meant to go into ours. We
were scoring in those end zones also.  Oklahoma would never have scored
thirty-five points.  There's no way we lost this one.  A&M demands a
recount."

Oklahoma officials are calling this "outrageous".  "They agreed to the size,

shape and locations of the end zones prior to kick-off," replies OU
coach Bob Stoops.  "If they had a problem with them, they should have said
so before we started.  You don't get to keep playing until you're happy
with the outcome.  Someone had to lose.  We've scored over thirty-five
points many times."

A&M has sent lawyers, farmers, and those guys in the funny boots as well
as that darn dog down to Kyle Field, where the scoreboard will be tested.
"We are confident that when the points are re-totaled, we will be the
winner of the game," says Slocum.

OU also points out that in many games prior to this one, the same end  zones

were used.  "They didn't have a problem with the end zones until they lost,"

says Stoops.

Outside of Kyle Field, A&M student protesters have gathered outside
bearing signs such as, "A&M wants a fair game! WHOOOOOOP!"  Students'
thoughts echoed their signs.  "All we want is a fair total of the points
before we declare a winner," says student Karen Hays, an aggie from Marfa.
"We need to proceed cautiously and not rush to judgment before we declare a
winner."

ABC, around 2:00pm central time, had mistakenly declared A&M the winner,
despite
the slim 3 point lead the Aggies held at that point.  At about 2:30 pm, with
the
game still too close to call, ABC had to back off its prediction.

College Football analyst Brent Musburger made the call.  "We felt that with
a number of points still not added in by Jamaar Tombs and the Aggies,
we were certain A&M would carry this game.  We may have been premature in
our prediction."


Molly, could you please forward the "thanks, but no  thanks" template letter
to me?  I will send it to her since she interviewed.  For persons who don't
interview,  I think the "no thanks" letter can come from HR.

Thanks for your assistance on this.

Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 11:38
PM ---------------------------

ARLGin48@aol.com on 11/30/2000 10:09:04 PM
To: Michelle.Cash@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Enjoyed meeting you

Dear Michelle---Just a note to tell you I thoroughly enjoyed meeting you
today.  Thank you for taking time to learn more about my background and
experience and to share your Enron story with me.  I am very interested in
the available position because I welcome the opportunity to learn new things
and improve my skills.  Although I have not worked at a law firm, I am
fortunate to say that my in-house experience has been very hands-on with most
of the transactions and all of the labor matters handled without outside
counsel.  I discussed this point at some length with Elizabeth Sager and left
a reference list with Molly McGee in HR.  Looking forward to hearing from you
soon,

Alice Ginsburgh


Nothing fatal. Here are some thoughts/comments on the AMA for your general
consideration:

2.2 (d) Bank accounts/bookkeeping.  I've previously been advised that Corp
performs this function.    Issues which arise: will the money be invested
overnight, who has signature authority, etc.  We have a draft services
agreement prepared for Peoples which can serve as a "go by" if you decide you
need a separate doc.

2.2 (b)Billing/collection.  Responsibility generally should stop at sending
nastygrams.  No duty to hire lawyers, etc.

2.2 (f) Insurance.  In Texas, you have to have licenses to buy/sell insurance
and adjust claims.  Current language may be soft enough to not violate
licensing laws.

2.2 (g) cost of filing for licenses and permits not included in defn of
Marketing Expenses, but there's some catch all language that might help.

2.3  Accountants may like it to be clear that we can't hire/fire O & M
contractor, set O & M policies, or dispatch plant.

3.2   If there are multiple transactions in a short period, these may be
captured in one document, not one document for each transaction.

 It would be helpful if the EEIM for use with others explains our agency
role. (may be in there - didn't review a copy) Is the Owner a power marketer
yet?  Are we helping them get EEIM's with the Approved Counterparties, or are
they on their own?

 Will Enron sign on behalf of Owner for Contractor (Enron) transactions
(sounds silly)?  Is there an EEIM in the works between EPMI and Owner?

3.3 (f) I suspect by now you've figured out profits, etc, relating to "day
of" transactions.

3.4  last line - should it be interruptible instead of contingent?  Assume
Owner has transmission risk?

Is there a "no third party beneficiary" clause?  I might have missed it.  Not
life or death.

Interesting structure.  Could I get a copy of the final document?

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron on 05/04/2001 11:47
AM ---------------------------

Paul Y'Barbo
02/08/2001 03:21 PM
To: Suzanne B Clapp/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: LPG - Puerto Rico - Revised Analysis

See Attached 2 pages


The report named:
<http://trv.dev.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=6&report_name
=Storage+P/L&category_cd=4&category_name=TEXAS&toc_hide=1&sTV1=4&TV1Exp=
Y&current_efct_date=06/01/2001> Storage P/L, published as of 06/01/2001
is now available for viewing on the website.


I need to be in Jim Derrick's office by 10:30. Lets not cancel the mmeeting,
but we need to start promptly at 10:00.

	Beth A Ryan
	06/12/2000 01:39 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, dpoe@ecogas.com
		 cc: Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: 6/15 Therm Tech Meeting

Thursday, June 15 Therm Tech meeting will be in Randy's office, EB3389 at
10:00am for one hour.  Or you may dial in: 1.888.422.7132     code: 390955

Thank you.


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001 10:03 AM -----

	"Williams, Stephen E." <sewilliams@mcguirewoods.com>
	05/31/2001 03:05 PM

		 To: "'elizabeth.sager@enron.com'" <elizabeth.sager@enron.com>
		 cc: "Spahn, Thomas E." <tspahn@mcguirewoods.com>,
"'janicermoore@hotmail.com'" <janicermoore@hotmail.com>
		 Subject: JaniceMooreConsent.doc

 <<JaniceMooreConsent.doc>>

 Elizabeth, I am sending you the attached consent at the request of
Janice Moore, who thought it would be best for me to contact you directly. I
have incorporated your comments--as relayed to me by Janice--into the
earlier draft.
 Please review this consent and, if you approve, lett me know by
e-mail or telephone (412...667.7900), whereupon I will prepare an original
and send it to you.
 Thank you very much.
     Steve Williams

 - JaniceMooreConsent.doc