Ben
Drawings were sent to Chuck Newell today.  As you stated, we need Sharon's
CA before Chuck can share technical detail with her.

Regards
Lynn DeKrey

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com [mailto:Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:35 PM
To: DeKrey Lynn
Cc: Monahan Bill; Carlos.Sole@enron.com; Kay.Mann@enron.com;
Jim.Bouillion@enron.com
Subject: Re: Issuance Confidentiality Agreements

Lynn:

Thanks for the e-mail. If Chuck's CA has been executed and returned to you,
then I would assume you can go ahead and send him the drawings. I
understand that if Sharon wants the drawings, she will have to sign a
seperate CA. Sending the drawings to Chuck, covered by his executed CA,
will certainly speed up the process. Let me know if you have any
objections.

Thanks,

Ben


What are you talking about?  You sent me some gay e-mail with a hyperlink.  I
never read those.

What's up with you?

I have been really busy with my new job but I cna't complain.  I am really
enjoying work again.

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@compaq.com> on 02/25/2000 02:15:15 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

What are you to good to respond to my emails?  Too good to even talk to me?
What the fuck is up with you?
JASON BASS
Technical Support Engineer

Compa Q


We don't have any regular on or off-peak deals for Sunday. In regard to
sending index prices via e-mail, I think it will be a lot more efficient for
everyone involved to do it this way. I only feel badly I didn't think of it
before! I will begin e-mailing each morning starting tomorrow, and it's no
problem for me to add counterparty's names to the spreadsheet - I just have
to get in the habit of doing it.

Thanks again,
Kate

djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com> on 03/26/2001 10:52:30 AM
To: "'Kate.Symes@enron.com'" <Kate.Symes@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Dow Jones Index 3-26

 Hello Kate, thank your so much for everything.  Me and Jennifer both
like email better than fax.  Therefore, you can start emailing to us from
now on.  About counter-party, we prefer to be on the report but if it takes
too much of your time then it is up to you to include it or not.  We need
conter-party's name when we confirm any kind of mismatch problem.  If you
include on the report, it save you from us calling you.  Otherwise, we have
to call you and ask for counter-party's name when we need to confirm any
transactions.  It is your call.
 Again, thank you and feel free to call me if you have any further
questions/concerns.
 Eric
 609-520-4683

P.S.  By the way, do you have any regular Firm On and Off Peak for Sunday?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kate.Symes@enron.com [mailto:Kate.Symes@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 1:11 PM
To: djenergy
Subject: Dow Jones Index 3-26

The attached document contains the EPMI average prices for all delivery
points for Sun., March 25, and Mon., March 26. Please let me know if you
have any problems opening the document or reading it. The worksheet should
look identical to the fax I send each day. An additional worksheet shows a
detail of each deal volume and price. I'm in the habit of excluding the
counterparty names (to save time) because I'm the only one who looks at
this sheet normally; but if you'd like me to start e-mailing instead of
faxing the prices I will begin entering the counterparty names as well.

(See attached file: DJ Index 3-26.xls)(See attached file: DJ Index
3-25.xls)

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001 05:47 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz@ENRON
	02/09/2001 04:27 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, EOL Call Center
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals/amendments, 2/9/01

Please see attached.


Can I get a copy of the full document?  Is it ready yet?

Thanks a million.

Best,
Jeff


Key must be that whatever organization is setup, it has to have a funding source not controlled by the Industry.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shelk, John
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Yeung, Charles; Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi; Ingersoll, Richard; Rodriquez, Andy; Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Bestard, Jose; Scott, Susan; Perrino, Dave; Walton, Steve
Subject:	RE: Update - Jeff Skilling Conference Call with John Q Anderson

Thanks to Jim and Charles for the reports on the NERC conference call earlier today.  Aside from whatever is done directly with NERC on details of their internal operations to respond to our concerns (i.e., Jeff's presentation to their board and the list of issues Charles had), the NERC/PJM drafting process will continue in DC in coming weeks.  In addition, Congressional staff are likely to be drafting electricity legislation, including a reliability title, during the August Recess that will start at the end of this week (i.e., we will likely be asked to comment on reliability legislation before any meetings with the NERC board are completed).  I will analyze the "shortened NERC" and "PJM Revised" versions and share some thoughts based on our objectives.


Please send me any dates you plan to be out of the office (either business or
vacation) during the month of March at your earliest convenience.  Calendars
will be distributed by the end of this week.  Thanks.


Please coordinate with PGE on the comments.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/28/2001
11:28 AM ---------------------------
From: AL ALEXANDERSON/ENRON@enronxgate on 04/27/2001 04:26 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FERC comments

Steve. PGE has 10 days to take a position and file comments on extending the
new must offer provision west-wide. Does Enron have a specific policy position
on this question?   On the other questions we like the surcharge and hate the
ISO's proposed iron curtain.  al


Ten spaces are still available for the Enron Charity Partners Golf Outing located on the TPC at The Woodlands, Monday, September 10th at 1:30 pm.
Attached is the information and entry form for this event.
Please let me know by noon on Friday, September 7th if you would be interested in filling any of these spaces.
Thanks.

Dorie Hitchcock
Event Manager
Enron
1400 Smith Street
Suite 3640a
Houston, TX  77002
Telephone:  (713) 853-6978
Fax:  (713) 646-5800
Cell:  (713) 594-7093
E-Mail:  dorie.hitchcock@enron.com


Do you want to go to dinner sometime?  Maybe I'll have you up to the house where I can do some REAL cooking!

-----Original Message-----
From: Christina Rawlings-Curtis [mailto:christina_122367@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:43 AM
To: Lucci, Paul T.
Subject: RE: Hey you!

I am hoping we can get together ASAP!!!!  You might (and are well on the
way) of becoming an addicion for me.  Give me, give me, give me...I need, I
need!  Glad you found someone to take my spot in the limo...NOT!  How would
you like to ask me to dinner sometime?

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


glad we're not a generator.

best,
jeff

	Dorothy Rothrock <drothrock@cmta.net>
	07/11/2001 12:45 PM

		 To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Sher Shops Alternative Edison Bailout Plan

worse for SCE and generators, who have to eat the small guy share of the
undercollection
between them. No transmission sale.

D

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

> better or worse than ours?
>
>
>                     Dorothy
>                     Rothrock             To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>                     <drothrock@cm        cc:
>                     ta.net>              Subject:     Re: Sher Shops
Alternative Edison
>                                          Bailout Plan
>                     07/11/2001
>                     12:20 PM
>
>
>
> let me know if delaney doesn't send to you...
>
> d
>
> Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
>
> > Thanks.  415.782.7854.  Better or worse than ours?
> >
> >
> >                     Dorothy
> >                     Rothrock             To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
> >                     <drothrock@cm        cc:     Ann.Cohn@sce.com,
> "'Barbara Barkovich
> >                     ta.net>              (E-mail)'"
> <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "Dominic
> >                                          DiMare (E-mail)"
> <dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>,
> >                     07/11/2001           "'John Fielder (E-mail)'"
> <fieldejr@sce.com>,
> >                     11:54 AM             "'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'"
> <isenberg@hmot.com>,
> >                                          "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'"
> <jdasovic@enron.com>,
> >                                          "'Keith McCrea (E-mail)'"
> <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
> >                                          "'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'"
> <lys@a-klaw.com>,
> >                                          "'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'"
> <lysherif@yahoo.com>,
> >                                          "'Gary Schoonyan (E-mail)'"
> <schoongl@sce.com>,
> >                                          "'John White (E-mail)'"
> <vjw@cleanpower.org>,
> >                                          dhunter@s-k-w.com,
> Rick.Simpson@asm.ca.gov
> >                                          Subject:     Re: Sher Shops
> Alternative Edison
> >                                          Bailout Plan
> >
> >
> > I have the plan.....who wants it? send your fax number (and $10 for
> > shipping
> > and handling....just kidding)
> >
> > D
> >
> > Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > > Folks:  Please see highlighted sections.  Anyone seen Byron's plan?
> Know
> > > where it's headed, etc.?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jeff
> > >
> *************************************************************************
> > > Power purchase bills exceed $7.5 billion
> > >
> > > Published Tuesday, July 10, 2001, in the San Jose Mercury News
> > > BY MARK GLADSTONE, NOAM LEVEY AND DION NISSENBAUM
> > >
> > > Mercury News Sacramento Bureau
> > >
> > > SACRAMENTO -- Six months after jumping into the electricity business,
> the
> > > Davis administration on Monday provided the first detailed glimpse of
> > > California's daily power purchases, showing more than $5 billion in
> > > payments, much of it to government-owned utilities and private
> companies
> > > that state officials have branded as price gougers.
> > >
> > > The state spent an additional $2.5 billion on a variety of contracts
> and
> > > other electricity services designed to stabilize the volatile energy
> > > markets, according to documents that the state agreed to release last
> > week
> > > amid a legal dispute over public access to the data.
> > >
> > > In roughly the first five months of the year, the state shelled out
> $1.2
> > > billion to Atlanta-based Mirant, the most any company was paid for
> > > electricity, followed by $1 billion to Powerex, the marketing arm of BC
> > > Hydro in British Columbia. It also paid $331 million to the Los Angeles
> > > Department of Water and Power.
> > >
> > > The documents raise questions about some of the common assumptions that
> > > have arisen around the electricity crisis. For instance, almost 40
> > percent
> > > of the state's purchases have come from government-run power generators
> > in
> > > California and elsewhere, but not Texas; some of the biggest suppliers
> > are
> > > from the Northwest.
> > >
> > > Gov. Gray Davis, who has ambitions to run for the White House, has put
> > much
> > > of the blame for the soaring costs of power on energy companies based
> in
> > > President Bush's home state.
> > >
> > > The figures are tucked inside 1,770 of pages of invoices that Davis has
> > > resisted divulging, saying disclosure would encourage suppliers to
> charge
> > > more. The state, which last month released information on its long-term
> > > electricity contracts worth $43 billion, agreed Thursday to release the
> > > first quarter details.
> > >
> > > Short on explanation
> > >
> > > The figures were disclosed late Monday by the California Department of
> > > Water Resources, which buys power for the state's financially strapped
> > > major utilities, and seem to buttress the administration's contention
> > that
> > > the price of power is gradually dropping but offer little or no
> > explanation
> > > for what prompted the decrease.
> > >
> > > In January, for instance, the average price for power on the spot
> market
> > > was $321 a megawatt hour. It peaked in April at $332 and dropped to
> $271
> > in
> > > May.
> > >
> > > One megawatt powers about 750 homes.
> > >
> > > Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said the price data supports the
> > governor's
> > > assertions that California has been gouged. ``The bad guys are clearly
> > the
> > > out-of-state generators,'' Maviglio said. ``There has been a
> significant
> > > shift of money out of California.''
> > >
> > > But the documents fail to shed much light on whether, as the
> > administration
> > > contends, the price drop was due to long-term power contracts
> negotiated
> > by
> > > the state earlier this year. Critics contend that the Davis
> > administration
> > > panicked and rushed into deals that commit the state to pay high prices
> > for
> > > many years.
> > >
> > > Used for support
> > >
> > > Republican officials used the price information to bolster their
> attacks
> > > against Davis, a Democrat, for signing long-term contracts with power
> > > generators even as the price of power on the spot market was coming
> down,
> > > partly because of the declining price of natural gas used to fuel many
> > > plants.
> > >
> > > ``It's more clear than ever that the long-term contracts are a bad
> > deal,''
> > > said Assemblyman Tony Strickland, R-Camarillo. ``The governor's really
> > hurt
> > > the ratepayers for the next five or 10 years.''
> > >
> > > The newly released bills highlight the volatility of California's
> energy
> > > market, where the price per megawatt hour ranged from $70 to $1,000. On
> > any
> > > given day, the records show, the prices from seller to seller varied
> > > widely, with some of the highest prices being charged by public
> utilities
> > > and companies outside Texas.
> > >
> > > On one day in February, for example, San Diego-based Sempra Energy was
> > > charging $165 per megawatt hour, the Eugene Water and Electric Board
> was
> > > charging nearly $500 and Duke Energy, a North Carolina company, was
> > > charging up to $575.
> > >
> > > The state's daily spending peaked May 10 at $102.4 million for all
> power,
> > > including the spot market and contracted power.
> > >
> > > The state began buying power in mid-January on behalf of the state's
> > major
> > > utilities, which were unable to borrow money to buy power after
> amassing
> > > enormous debts for electricity.
> > >
> > > San Jose-based Calpine Corp., which is building several new power
> plants
> > > around California including one in South San Jose, did only $29 million
> > > worth of business with the state in the first five months of the year,
> > > according to the figures.
> > >
> > > The state began buying power in mid-January when Pacific Gas & Electric
> > Co.
> > > and Southern California Edison Co. were on the ropes financially. PG&E
> > > later went into bankruptcy.
> > >
> > > On Monday, state lawmakers took another shot at trying to cobble
> together
> > a
> > > plan to rescue financially ailing Edison.
> > >
> > > While most concede that a rescue plan Davis worked out with Edison will
> > not
> > > win the necessary support in the Legislature, lawmakers have created
> > > several working groups to come up with alternatives.
> > >
> > > Compromise plan
> > >
> > > On Monday, state Sen. Byron Sher, D-Redwood City, unveiled the latest
> > > compromise proposal that seeks to protect average ratepayers and small
> > > businesses from further rate increases and forces everyone else to help
> > > finance the Edison bailout.
> > >
> > > The ``shared pain'' proposal would force power producers, owed about $1
> > > billion, to take a 30 percent ``haircut'' and agree to forgive about
> $300
> > > million in Edison debts. Edison would be asked to swallow $1.2 billion
> --
> > > about a third of its debt. And big users would be asked to pay off the
> > > remaining $2 billion in debts, possibly by paying higher prices for
> > power.
> > >
> > > In exchange, large companies would be given the opportunity to buy
> power
> > on
> > > the open market, a system that would allow many of them to sign cheap
> > > energy deals.
> > >
> > > Sher presented the proposal to Senate Democrats Monday afternoon, but
> it
> > > remains unclear how much support the framework will receive in the
> > > Legislature.
> > >
> > > Contact Mark Gladstone at mgladstone@sjmercury.com or (916) 325-4314.


EPMI and EES -- Attached is information regarding changes effective December 15 to SPP's credit policy.  SPP requests that Enron (EPMI and EES if necessary) return a new credit agreement.

Please let us know if we can assist with this.  Thanks.  Christi 37007

-----Original Message-----
From: Maurer, Luiz
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.
Cc: Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: SPP Credit Policy

Chris

As per your request, I examined the new SPP credit policy and creditworthness standards.

I tried to compare with previous versions, but I did not find any. I just encountered vague references on chapter 11 of the Open Acess Transmission Tariff document. Apparently, there is more posted on Oasis.

I contacted SPP and the response I got from Phil follows. He also copied Michael Jacobson.

Who else should receive this information? The new policy is effective December 15.

Thanks for your continued guidance.

LM

-----Original Message-----
From: McCraw, Phil [mailto:pmccraw@spp.org]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:27 AM
To: Maurer, Luiz
Subject: SPP Credit Policy

Luiz,

I received your forwarded voice mail and email you had sent to Sherry
Jenson.  Thanks for looking at the credit policy.  The answer to your
question is that there has never been this much detail available on our
credit policy.  I would say to just use the one posted now would be the best
thing to do.

I did not know who would need to see the policy at your company so I sent
the following email to Michael Jacobson at your company.  If there is
anything further I can do for you feel free to let me know.

 Michael,

If you are not the proper person to receive this request will you please
forward it to the proper person within your organization.

We have recently made significant changes to our credit policy and we have
requested all customers be compliant with the credit policy by December 15
of this year.  I have attached a copy of the credit policy reflecting these
changes for your review.

After reviewing your company's last 24 calendar months of activity it would
appear that we will need a letter of credit in the amount of at least
$100,000 for you to be compliant with the terms of the policy.  Approved
language for the letter of credit is at the end of the credit policy as
attachment 2.  The issuing bank must also be acceptable to SPP and these
requirements can be located in the financial security section of the policy
under Letter of Credit.  Also, we have mailed and emailed the policy with a
request to send back the credit agreement.  I have also attached a copy of
this agreement.  If you would have it signed and sent back as well it would
be greatly appreciated.

 <<Form-SPPCreditPolicy2CS111401.doc>>  <<SPPCreditAgreement110101.doc>>

Phil McCraw
Southwest Power Pool
Financial Coordinator
Phone: 501-664-0146X243 or 501-614-3243
Fax: 501-280-9446
Email: pmccraw@spp.org


Edmund: Mexico is already underway.

Bruce: Can you comment on the relative importance of the following countries
to MG's business? It costs us about GBP 15,000 to add each country (due
diligence and document preparation costs). I may also be able to add a
comment on Korea by tomorrow.

Chile
Brazil
Peru
Korea
Republic of China

Dave

Edmund Cooper@ECT
06/14/2000 12:58 PM
To: jonathan.marsh@linklaters.com
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Amita
Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Lara Fields/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Metals due diligence

Dear Jonathan,

Following our earlier telephone conversation, here is the list of countries
for which we need to undertake follow-up commodity due diligence for trading
physical metals products.  As the initial two products to be offered are
aluminium and copper we should restrict the due diligence to base metals
only.  In addition, let's ask for the position on cash-settled derivatives -
should involve only a follow-up question asking whether previous advice for
energy commodity derivatives changes in respect of derivatives on metals.
However, the initial focus should be on the physical trading questions.

Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,
Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, Slovenia,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Also, there is the following list of countries, for which there is currently
EOL access documentation which will need to have the same review.
Mark - do you want us to handle the due diligence over here, or do you want
to run with it?

Australia
Canada
Japan
United States

There is a third list of countries for which we currently do not have EOL
access documentation.
Dave/Amita/Mark - Are we going to proceed with preparing such access
documentation for these countries?

Chile
Brazil
Peru
Mexico
Korea
Republic of China

Regards,

Edmund


SORRY I gave you the incorrect deal number for this error.  Should be deal
549052.

original error:
Diana Scholtes
deal 549053    549052
Prebon shows price as $141 and delivery pt as Mid-C

Diana Scholtes
Prebon broker said our price (215) and del. point (Cob) are right

S

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:39 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout

Prebon
Sean Crandall
549048 - changed to NP

Diana Scholtes
Prebon broker said our price (215) and del. point (Cob) are right

Jeff Richter
549013 - changed to APB

549010 - enron buys BP/Apr01/NP/peak/207.00 (in with Amerex - should it be
Prebon?)

Chris Mallory - just entered Williams deal

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:27 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/13 Checkout

AMEREX
All deals checked out fine

PREBON

Sean Crandall
deal 549048
Prebon shows del. point as NP-15

Diana Scholtes
deal 549053
Prebon shows price as $141 and delivery pt as Mid-C

Jeff Richter
deal 549013
Prebon does not recognize

I am missing the following:
1) Enron buys from BP Energy 25 mw of April'01 NP-15 peak hrs at $207
2) Enron buys Williams 25 mw of SP-15 of April'01 off-peak hrs at $107

BLOOMBERG
All deals checked out fine.


Tom,
I politely advised the lady with Spinnaker that she needs to get me the
changes by 10:30 or I would have to make the change the following day.
Just a FYI....they called at 11:15 and just Emailed it to me.
Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark L Schrab/HOU/ECT on 12/04/2000 12:44
PM ---------------------------

Billyoung3@aol.com on 12/04/2000 11:52:15 AM
To: nferrie@enron.com, mschrab@enron.com, victoria.versen@enron.com,
RYKESTER@aol.com, sschro@wtoffshore.net, ajt3@petroquest.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: December Nominations for VR 376 ( VR 375 #A-1/#A-1-D)

Nelson please coordinate renominations per attached. If for any reason Enron
differs in opinion, please advise asap.
Return-Path: <mgullette@petroquest.com>
Received: from  rly-zd04.mx.aol.com (rly-zd04.mail.aol.com [172.31.33.228])
by air-zd02.mail.aol.com (v77.14) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Dec 2000 11:39:19 -0500
Received: from  linux1.globalreach.net (linux1.globalreach.net
[206.97.249.10]) by rly-zd04.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Dec
2000 11:39:07 -0500
Received: from marilyn2 (as18.globalreach.net [206.97.249.118]) by
linux1.globalreach.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA26701; Mon, 4 Dec 2000
10:38:45 -0600
From: "Marilyn Gullette" <mgullette@petroquest.com>
To: "Bill Young \(E-mail\)" <Billyoung3@aol.com>,        "Tom Jones
\(E-mail\)" <tjones@spinexp.com>
Cc: "Alfred Thomas, III"@linux1.globalreach.net
Subject: December Nominations for VR 376 ( VR 375 #A-1/#A-1-D)
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:42:20 -0600
Message-ID: <000e01c05e11$2e214080$2c01a8c0@marilyn2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C05DDE.E3885720"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Importance: Normal

This is to request that Spinnaker increase their nomination effective as
soon as possible from the current 9,100 to 12,600.  A spreadsheet is
attached showing the figures and method used to determine the requested
rate.  I will continue to monitor the well(s) daily for rate changes and
will advise of required changes in noms.

Please advise when you have increased your nom and the effective date -
either by e-mail or telephone (direct line 337/272-7403).  Thank you for
your cooperation in this effort to maintain a balance between noms and
delivery.

 - WS to calc suggested noms for Dec VR 375.xls


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 04/22/2001 12:17 PM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	04/22/2001 12:11 PM

		 To: "Jeffrey A. Krieger" <jkrieger@ggfcmk.com>@ENRON
		 cc: mcohen@ggfrcmk.com, jrnelson@llgm.com, hweg@pgwlaw.com
		 Subject: Re: Next Participants' Committee Meeting

I am thinking about coming from Houston for this meeting--- depending on the
agenda. What is the agenda?

	"Jeffrey A. Krieger" <jkrieger@ggfcmk.com>
	04/20/2001 07:52 PM

		 To: <pgurfein@akingump.com>, <jcrossen@apx.com>, <rberry@apx.com>,
<rich.stevens@avistacorp.com>, <david.burns@bakerbotts.com>,
<doug.anderson@calenergy.com>, <dag@dgdk.com>, <rkd@dgdk.com>,
<richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, "Anne Marie DeFelice" <adefelice@ggfcmk.com>,
"Cindy Stremmel" <cstremmel@ggfcmk.com>, "Garrett L. Hanken"
<ghanken@ggfcmk.com>, "Jeffrey A. Krieger" <jkrieger@ggfcmk.com>, "Marc S.
Cohen" <mcohen@ggfcmk.com>, <kjohan@ladwp.com>, <ceklund@llgm.com>,
<dwhitley@llgm.com>, <jrnelson@llgm.com>, <mlubic@mdbe.com>,
<zack.starbird@mirant.com>, <pmar@mofo.com>, <hweg@pgwlaw.com>,
<david.facey@powerex.com>, <teresa.conway@powerex.com>,
<rbeitler@sempratrading.com>, <awells@stroock.com>, <ayudkowsky@stroock.com>,
<pjazayeri@stroock.com>, <bholman@whitecase.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Next Participants' Committee Meeting

To:  The Participants' Committee:

The next meeting of the Participants' Committee will be this Tuesday, April
24, 2001 at 10 a.m. P.D.T.    You can participate telephonically (call in
number to follow on Monday) or appear in person at Greenberg Glusker in
conference Room 21A (21st Floor).

Jeffrey A. Krieger
(310) 785-6869

www.ggfcmk.com

**************************
* Confidentiality Notice *
**************************

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and is
intended to be privileged and confidential within the attorney client
privilege.  If you have received this message in error, please immediately
notify the sender and delete all copies of this email message along with all
attachments.  Thank you.


Hi Jeannie,

Several months ago I met with Jennifer Milligan regarding part-time
employment. I still have an interest in this area, and thought I would drop
you a note to see if you know of any upcoming opportunities/positions within
the company.  I have no definite time frame, but I do know that I do have a
strong interest in part-time employment.  Please let me know if anything
comes up, and also if we need to meet.

I would appreciate discretion regarding my search for part-time employment (
please do not discuss with Hunter) as I do not want to jeopardize my position
on the desk or have him thinking that I'm not giving 100% because I'm
interested in part-time employment.  I've casually mentioned this to him in
the past, so he's somewhat aware, but probably did not take me very seriously.

Thanks for your help!


Alliance Deliveries Delayed until Nov. 13

In a move that is likely to send ripples through the market, particularly
around Chicago, the 1.325 Bcf/d Alliance Pipeline extended its commercial
in-service delay last week to Nov. 13 from Oct. 30. Pipeline officials said
moisture and debris in the line caused the delay.

"As we have increased the flow of test gas volumes during our system
commissioning, we have encountered moisture and debris from construction,"
said CEO Norm Gish. "Specifically, most of the debris is in the form of small
pieces of foam from the [smart] pigs that were used to remove the hydrostatic
testing water from the line. The problem forced us to shut down the system
for short periods of time to clean out accumulated debris.

"We have since designed and installed additional in-line screens at our
compressor stations. The situation is improving and we are removing
ever-decreasing amounts of debris with increased flows of test gas. However,
this situation has not permitted us to run our system with the significant
volumes necessary to adequately test the reliability of our compressors."

It is the second time Alliance has had to delay its in-service date. In early
September, Alliance officials said rain in Saskatchewan this summer,
directional drilling problems at a creek in British Columbia, complex
connection problems with the Aux Sable liquids plant in Illinois and
connection delays with several U.S. pipelines and LDCs was to blame for a
one-month delay to Oct. 30 (see Daily GPI, Sept. 11).

The pipeline will continue increasing test volumes until it begins commercial
service, said Gish. There currently is about 500 MMcf/d of test gas in the
line. He expects firm delivery capacity to reach the full 1.325 Bcf/d prior
to Nov. 13.

Alliance officials also noted that this is the first time a pipeline the size
of Alliance has been brought on stream at one time.

Regardless of the challenge, however, market participants were expecting the
system to be delivering gas starting at the beginning of the month of
November and this delay is likely to have a significant impact on November
bidweek trading.

One Chicago trader said he had a strong suspicion something was fishy when
his index offers were lifted Friday afternoon by a marketing company, which
he knows to own capacity on the pipe. "Everyone was a buyer of index gas
today for November, especially those now short for the first 13 days. I sold
mine at NGI plus 1.5, but had I known that Alliance was delayed I would have
held out for something a little better."

Basis, meanwhile, was pretty much unchanged at +13 to +14 for November. "It
takes a lot to move the Chicago basis," he said.


Republican Plan B
A source reports the following regarding the Republican Plan B proposal:
?	Encourage direct access for consumers.  (The problem with this, however, is that these direct access deals would not have a dedicated rate component, and too many might undermine the cash flow and credit worthiness of the bonds.)
?	The Republicans will "suggest" that generators take a 30% haircut.  "We think this is doable."
?	The Republicans strongly oppose purchasing the transmission assets.
?	Restore the invetor-owned utility model for generation.  They would establish a dedicated rate component for construction of native generation by the utilities.  They would grant ratepayers equity interest in these plants.
?	Resolve the QFs' financial issues.

Assemblyman Cox commented afterward that the Republcans have been trying to work on a bilateral basis with the Democrats on these issues, but they feel "frozen out."  Moreover, he senses the Democrats moving back toward having an option to purchase SoCal's transmission assets, which the Republicans oppose.

Democratic Plan B
A source reports the following regarding the Democratic Plan B:
?	The Democrats are formulating a Plan B that incorporates the Governor's MOU, the Nation Plan B and other ideas that they have.  This plan reportedly has not yet been introduced into the legislature yet because it is still being finalized and the Democrats are not certain that it will work.  Specifically, the option to purchase SoCal's transmission assets is reportedly still being debated.  Some Democrats reportedly believe that this may be unnecessary.
?	The details of the plan are reportedly as follows:
- Set aside the $3.1 bilion undercollect in a separate account funded by a dedicated rate 	component.
- The generators can either get a check instantly from the bonds for 70% of their 	claim or they can try to get up to 100% of their claim adjudicated through a 	dispute.
- This plan could be used as a template for going to the bankruptcy judge to strike a deal 	for PG&E.
?	Sources indicate that the Democrats are developing a post-petition plan in cast SoCal files for bankruptcy, including the following:
- The state would buy both utilities out of bankruptcy.  It then would sell of pieces of 	the utilities to various private-sector buyers, but with a lifetime stipulation on 	how they will be run.
- Some Democrats reportedly believe the state could do this with as little as $5 billion if 	it assumed the utilities' debt and got a cram-down by the bankrutpcy judge to quell 	the protests against such a plan that would very likely erupt.  Democrats reportedly 	believe that the Judge Montali would support this idea.


Andreas,

I shall be glad to speak. I can address topic 2 or 4
(energy risk or volatility).

Vince Kaminski

"Andreas Simou" <andreas.simou@dynamic-events.com> on 08/15/2000 09:58:26 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: The GARP 2001 Convention: invitation to Speak

INVITATION TO SPEAK

GARP 2001

The 2nd Annual Risk Management Convention

13th & 14th February, 2001 ) Marriott World Trade  Center, New York

Dear Kaminski

Further to my telephone conversation today with your secretary, Shirley
Crenshaw, and on behalf of the Global Association of Risk Professionals,  I
have great pleasure in inviting you to speak at our 2nd Annual  Risk
Management Convention ) GARP 2001.

This event has rapidly establishing itself as the risk management industry,s
most important meeting point. GARP 2000 reflected the key concerns of risk
management experts world-wide, with over 400 attendees in its first year.
Three  simultaneous streams address traditional pricing and risk management
techniques,  along with specialised streams addressing new sectors, such as
the corporate  world and the insurance industry. With a speaker panel of over
55 senior and  executive financial professionals from investment banks,
regulatory bodies,  asset management firms, academics, insurers/re-insurers,
corporate and system  providers this is THE financial risk management event
of the year.

Key areas that this Convention will consider include Market Risk (stress
testing, liquidity, jump diffusion, EVT), Credit Risk (regulation, modeling,
stress testing, credit portfolio management, credit derivatives),
Operational  Risk, (regulation, data, modeling, validation, EVT) Advanced
Asset &  Liability Management, Corporate/Energy Risk Management and the
Insurance &  Capital Markets.

From my research and discussions with experts in this arena your name was
highly recommended as a speaker for this event. Below is the stream on
Corporate  / Energy Risk Management and I had in mind ONE of the sessions
below for you.  Also, the topic titles are provisional and I am open to
suggested  alterations.

Corporate/Energy Risk Management

Modelling Corporate Risk ) Risk Management from a Shareholder Value
Perspective

Measuring Energy Risk ) Tackling Price Volatility, Adapting VaR, Scenario
Modelling and Regulatory Requirements

Forward Pricing ) Construction of the Forward Curve, Correlations,
Transparency Issues

The Volatility Challenge ) Modelling Price Volatility and Examining the  New
Products Designed to Stabilise Volatility

Energy Credit Risk Management

GARP is a not-for-profit, independent organisation of risk management
practitioners and researchers from leading financial institutions
world-wide.  GARP,s mission is to facilitate the exchange of information,
developing  educational programs and promoting standards in the area of
financial risk  management. For more information please refer to our web
site: www.garp.com

I sincerely hope you will be able to accept this invitation and I look
forward to hearing from you in due course. Should you have any questions
please  do not hesitate to contact me, otherwise I will call you again on to
discuss  this further.

Best regards

Andreas

PS I have also attached a copy of GARPs 2000 program for your attention.
____________________________
Andreas Simou
GARP 2001 - Conference  Producer
Tel? +44 (0) 20 7626 9301
Fax +44 (0) 20 7626  9900
 - Draft programme.doc
 - g2000b&wlowr.pdf


Thanks.  How was the rest of your weekend?

RR


Your P&L tonight was down 7,500, including Elsa and Carey.  Storage was 9,000
up.  The AGA was 133 withdrawal.  Your position is short 40.  We'll see you
tomorrow.

Dave and Bryan


Many of you have received requests for feedback through the Performance
Evaluation Program ("PEP") system.  This feedback is used by the Performance
Review Committee in conducting its evaluations and also is used in preparing
the written performance reviews.

Please take the time to complete the forms and provide candid, accurate
feedback when it is requested.

The deadline for completing evaluation forms is November 17th.

Mark Haedicke and Michelle Cash


No positions.  Archive.

DG

From: Jennifer Velasco/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 10:13 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Updated Book Admin

I am setting these up so that they can be listed under US GAS WEST but I have
a question. Does WEST-KEYSTONE-IDX have any positions? Does it need to be set
as active?

Jennifer
X 5-2526

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Giron, Darron
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:36 AM
To: Velasco, Jennifer
Subject: RE: Updated Book Admin

Thanks.  I also noticed that we have some books that are not listed under US
GAS WEST but should be.  I cannot change tha Trading Group.  Do you do this
as well?  The books are:
  WEST-KEYSTONE
  WEST-NW
  WEST-PERM
  WEST-SJ
  WEST-SW
Thanks.

DG


Start Date: 10/9/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Boryeu Mao wrote:

> I'm running polr() and getting warning messages from glm.fit().  It seems
> reasonable to use glm.control() to turn on the trace and follow what
> glm.fit() does when called by polr(); or is it?
>
> glm.control(maxit=10, trace=TRUE)
> polr(act~., data=mm)
>
> The glm.control() sets the trace TRUE, but there's no change in the output
> from polr().

No, it doesn't: it returns an object to be passed to glm.

glm.fit is only used in polr to find starting values, so specify `start'
to polr.

polr is in package MASS, BTW.

--
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._


Company Sleuth Daily Report
==========================
Company Sleuth is a registered trademark of Infonautics, Inc. (Nasdaq: INFO) or its subsidiaries.
-----------------------------

Special Notice:
-----------------------------
Coming Soon ...
Company Sleuth Research Library

    We understand it is important for you to know what decisions your Stakeout companies have made and what they are planning for the future.  Having access to this information can help you anticipate the potential impact on their stock performance.

    That's why we are introducing the Company Sleuth Research Library, one of the most powerful research resources available to individual investors.

    With the Company Sleuth Research Library, you will be empowered to search over 10 million articles from top domestic and international media sources to find the company, industry, market or general information you need.

    This service can only be found at Company Sleuth, providing yet another unique investment resource that sets it apart from other investment sites.

    Look for the Company Sleuth Research Library to be part of the upcoming subscription service.  With the subscription service, you will gain access to the most current, relevant information and research tools to help you make more informed strategic decisions on your investments.

    As a subscriber, you will have access to all of Company Sleuth services, including the following:
    ?	A Stakeout list so you can track new findings on up to 50 companies
    ?	Over 25 in-depth company reports
    ?	Ability to conduct searches through the Company Sleuth Research Library
    ?	Email notifications to alert you to the new findings on your Stakeout companies
    ?	Plus more

    Once available, you can subscribe for this new service and begin your subscription with a FREE 14-day trial. If you choose not to subscribe, your account will be shifted to a limited access membership status with restricted use of the Company Sleuth services.

    Watch the site and your email for more information on how to sign up for the subscription service.  Click here <http://www.companysleuth.com/snapshot_demo.cfm> for a sample of the new Snapshot page.

------------------------------
This is your Personal Company Sleuth Report for Saturday May 19, 2001.
-------------------------------
Your Stakeout Companies
-------------------------------
Here are the new items Company Sleuth found on your stakeout companies last night.

Enron Corp. (ENE)
	SEC Filings.....................1
	Raging Bull Msg.................21
	Yahoo Msg.......................40
	Motley Fool Msg.................20
	Tech. Trading...................6
	TVAlerts........................2
	Rabbitt Ratings.................1
	CNBC Msg........................80
	To view this company's report, go to:
	http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?actiontype=6&username=WMSON&ticker=ENE

About Company Sleuth
--------------------
"?Company Sleuth electronically tracks companies of your choosing on what's called the Stakeout List. The Stakeout List includes some obscurities such as domain name registrations and patents as well as more run-of-the-mill information such as insider trades, news, and broker reports. The number of message board postings on a stock is displayed in a chart, indicating whether the buzz is heating up or petering out. You don't even need to visit the site regularly-Company Sleuth will e-mail the results so you can pick and choose what to read."
- "13 Sites That Put You Above The Crowd" by Paul Barr, OnlineInvestor, November 2000

Customize Company Sleuth
------------------------
CompanySleuth has revised its Privacy Policy.  Click here  http://www.companysleuth.com/privacy.cfm to view the revised Privacy Policy.

Cancel E-mail
http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?username=WMSON&actiontype=1

Contact Company Sleuth
http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?username=WMSON&actiontype=2

Change Stakeout Companies
http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?username=WMSON&actiontype=3

Modify E-mail Content
http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?username=WMSON&actiontype=4

Change to HTML E-mail
http://www.companysleuth.com/login/email_login.cfm?username=WMSON&actiontype=5

Company Sleuth is a registered trademark of Infonautics, Inc. (Nasdaq: INFO) or its subsidiaries.
Copyright 2000 Infonautics Corporation http://www.infonautics.com


I have you scheduled.

Dolores

Vince J Kaminski
08/30/2000 08:13 AM
To: Dolores Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re:

Dolores

Please, register me for a session on 9/29/2000 at 12:45.

Vince Kaminski

Celeste Roberts
08/29/2000 06:21 PM
To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject:

URGENT

The Associate and Analyst Recruiting Department will be conducting a number
of two hour workshops to review our recruiting and interview process for the
fall on-campus recruiting effort.  Critical information regarding our
on-campus interview process, revised evaluation forms and program structure
will be reviewed during these two hours sessions.

It is mandatory that all team members attend these workshops.  All team
members must attend in order to articulate and demonstrate the Enron
recruiting process.  Knowing how busy schedules are, we have made
arrangements to present these workshops in two hours sessions for a total of
40 workshops that will run during the last week of August, through the month
of September and end at mid October.

Listed below are the dates, location and times for each session.  Please
select a date and time and e-mail this information to my assistant, Dolores
Muzzy.  We can accommodate 25 participants at a time.  Dolores will take
dates and times on a first come, first serve basis.  We have scheduled enough
sessions to accommodate every member of both the Associate and Analyst
recruiting teams.

In order to participate in the recruiting process, you must attend one of
these sessions.  We will be tracking participation.  CPE credits will also be
given for attending this workshop.


Thank you for all your hard work.  This is something that has needed to be done, but no one would take the initiative.  Let's just hope all your hard work makes it to the datasheet.

Thanks!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maxwell, Matt
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:32 AM
To:	Theriot, Kim S.; Heard, Marie
Cc:	Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	ENA POAs and AIFs

Thank you both for the hard work and quick turnaround with regard to cleaning up the Powers of Attorney for Enron North America Corp.  This was a large project for us all.

I hoping to get the documents initialed today revoking the old and appointing the new.

Once executed and the data entry is complete, the database will accurately reflect reality for the first time that anyone can remember.

Sincerely,

Mx


Could you find the deal ticket for Trco k#2.7055?

May
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000 01:08
PM ---------------------------
From: Beverly Beaty on 01/28/2000 01:05 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Do you see 2.7055 in Unify?

Nope.........


Sara,

We need to draft an ISDA for Empire Paper Group, LLC.  We would like to
insert language that will allow Enron to get a second lien on the assets
after the primary lender instead of using the CSA.  Cross default thresholds
are $1MM and $100MM, respectively for Empire and Enron.

Please send the draft to credit first and we will check the new language.
The underwriters are Jay Epstein and Chris Croon.

If you have any questions please feel free to call.

Thanks,

Jane Wilhite
ext. 35063


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Siegel, Adam
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 8:34 AM
To:	Woods, Trevor
Subject:	RE: Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy

Nope, but I would call up some of the SCR manufacturers, Babcock and Wilcox, ABB, GE.  Also, did you see the article in that same issue of Clean Air Compliance about AEP Ammonia on Demand.  It's gonna be all about urea baby.  I would figure out a strategy fast, after it's in a news article its pretty much too late.  As clueless as the NOXTech guys are it may be worth picking their brains to try to get some insight. Call me if you want to bounce some ideas around.

-Adam

P.S. Wouldn't you want to buy ammonia if you think there is going to be more demand for it?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Woods, Trevor
Sent:	03 August 2001 14:24
To:	Siegel, Adam
Subject:	RE: Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy

Got it.  Looks like the ammonia market is long and has a ton of diverse players.  Did you do analysis on what the demand of the SCRs would be?  I'm wondering if we couldn't sell it as a hedge as opposed to a spec play.  The more SCRs the more ammonia goes up and the cost of allowances go down (in theory).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Siegel, Adam
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 7:58 AM
To:	Woods, Trevor
Subject:	RE: Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy

yup, it's in today's journal

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Woods, Trevor
Sent:	03 August 2001 13:30
To:	adam.siegel@enron.com@ENRON <mailto:adam.siegel@enron.com@ENRON>
Subject:	RE: Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy

The link didn't work.  Is this in today's journal?  I'll forward you an email from Jeff Keeler.  Nobody here seems very concerned with her comments.  From our regulatory, to a few traders.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	adam.siegel@enron.com@ENRON <mailto:adam.siegel@enron.com@ENRON> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-adam+2Esiegel+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTES-adam+2Esiegel+40enron+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]>
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 5:29 AM
To:	Woods, Trevor
Subject:	Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy

[IMAGE]

 [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    WSJ.com << File: <http://www.wsj.com> >>  [IMAGE]         [IMAGE]        Read the paragraph further down in the article about Whitman.  May not be as bearish as I thought.  -Adam          [IMAGE]          [IMAGE]Regulatory Rollback Under Bush Has a Major Impact on Economy << File: <http://wsj.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=89677612> >>                  Click the following to access the sent link:   SAVE THIS link << File: <http://wsj.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThisPopupApp?clickMap=saveFromET&partnerID=150&etMailToID=89677612> >>  FORWARD THIS link << File: <http://wsj.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=forward&etMailToID=89677612&partnerID=150> >>     Please note, the sender's email address has not been verified.      Get your EMAIL THIS Browser Button and use it to email information from any Web site. [IMAGE] << File: <http://wsj.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=browserButtons> >>         [IMAGE]

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com <mailto:enron.messaging.administration@enron.com> and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 08/11/2000 10:27
AM ---------------------------

Jeff Dasovich on 08/11/2000 10:26:23 AM
To: Paul Kaufman@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, mpalmer@enron.com, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: ISO Special 8.10.00 Report on Energy Market Issues and Performance:
May-June, 2000

FYI.  The ISO Dept. of Market Analysis Released a rather hefty "special
report" yesterday.  The URL is attached.
Among other things, it concludes that, despite the lack of generation
concentration
in California, market power in times of shortage has been partially
responsible for the price spikes.

"The observed market power was the combined effect of the bidding activity of
in-state and out-of-state generation sources....
The high prices bid by out-of-state suppliers as well as the high prices
quoted to ISO's out-of-market calls are indications of
the market power of out-of-state suppliers"...[A]t high load conditions, even
suppliers with less than a 9% market share can
have significant market power."

http://www.caiso.com/pubinfo/recent.html


Walter, to be able to get a quick turnaround on these counterparty setups, my
group needs the address and phone number to these counterparties....our
deadline is 10:00 am today, and with the minimal information on the
spreadsheet (just CP name) we will not be able to complete setup by deadline
and cause delays for the global contracts group.....

Please provide the data above asap.....call if you have any
questions....thanks....

Mary Gosnell
x3-1727

Walter Guidroz@ENRON
10/15/2000 12:53 PM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: ClickPaper counterparty approvals, 10-13-00

Attached are new ClickPaper counterparty approvals for 10-13-00.  I tried to
get these out on Friday afternoon but Lotus Notes was down for everyone in
our group...

Walter


Vince -
Tim Despain asked me to forward this information to you as part of the effort
to establish Enron's cost of capital.  If you need any additional information
or clarification, feel free to give me a call at x57538.
CF


After a year in RT...yeah, you could do it...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Virginia
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 2:30 PM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	Could I do it?

A position has recently become available in the Real Time Trading group reporting to Bill Williams.  Bill will be holding an information session on Wednesday, July 25, 2001 at 4:00 pm in Mt Hood for anyone who is interested in learning more about this opportunity.

  Bill,

  You think I could do it?  Think you could handle me?   :)

  VA


If I remember correctly, we'll need to paper the additional Sempra capacity,
either with an amendment or a separate agreement.  I'll be in the office by
about 9:30 and we can talk about it then.


TJ and Don,

I have set-up incentive pay for all of the following, to be paid July 31, 2001.

Regards,
Carmen Chavira
HR Service Connection Center
(713)853-0648
(713)646-8086 fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Black, Tamara Jae
Sent:	Friday, July 06, 2001 11:00 AM
To:	Chavira, Carmen
Cc:	Melodick, Kim
Subject:	FW: EPMI Employees working on Forth of July U.S. Independence Holiday
Importance:	High

I just wanted to give you a heads up....I will make sure that this is on the time sheet for this pay period.

Thanks Tjae

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baughman Jr., Don
Sent:	Tuesday, July 03, 2001 12:38 PM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Cc:	Hernandez, Juan
Subject:	EPMI Employees working on Forth of July U.S. Independence Holiday

TJ,

The following Realtime employees on the East Power Desk  shall work on July 4th; U.S. Independence Holiday :

MW & SE
Don Baughman
Dean Laurent
John Kinser
Juan Hernandez
Miguel Garcia
Joe Stepenovitch
Larry F Campbell
Peter Makkai
Maricio Trejo
Ben Rogers

ERCOT
Alex McErealth
Chris Watts
Steve Olinde

Please advise Carmen Chavira, so that these employees may receive Holiday Pay.

Thanks you,

Don


i'll give you a call in a few

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Emily Hillegeist" <ehillegeist@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Emily+20Hillegeist+22+20+3Cehillegeist+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	sscott5@enron.com
Subject:

did you just try to call me on the cell?  it's not charged- surprise.  call
me at the house if you need to...
e
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Hi Vince.
Look at this guy (picture included).

He is "Lawrence", the guy I spoke to you about last week that you said you
wanted to see.

He asked me if he can do a phone interview...I think Williams, Ford and
SDCERA are soliciting him.
If I told him You and ENRON are interested- he would drop the others off the
map for a chance to interview with you.

I like him too as he follows my instructions as is pleasant to work with
(most are not).

Do you want to chat with him?

On your command,
Jeff Wesley

ALWAYS HELD IN STRICT CONFIDENCE.
     Jeff Wesley
 949 813 2241 Hotline
347 487 8957 Voice/Fax US
  +44(845)3341644 UK

*  Get free, secure online email at http://www.ziplip.com/  *

 - Image002.jpg
 - LAWRENCEAGENT9498132241NEW.doc


Here is the list of all power-gas books set up in Netco production database and please check and let me know ASAP if there is any missing or incorrect information.

CP ID	Short Name	Code	Region	Commodity	Uom	Currency	Commodity/UOM/Curr
166961	PWR-GAS-OPTION	ME	NYMEX	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
166966	PWR-GAS-WMGMT	MJ	NYMEX	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD	deleted
167192	PWR-GAS-PJM	ME	NYMEX3	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
167108	PWR-GAS-LT-ERCT	ME	NYMEX7	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
167109	PWR-GAS-SE	ME	NYMEX8	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
167111	PWR-GAS-ST-PJM	ME	NYMEX9	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
167113	PWR-GAS-ST-ERCT	ME	NYMEX10	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
167114	PWR-GAS-ST-NY	ME	NYMEX11	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
167115	PWR-GAS-ST-MW	ME	NYMEX12	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
167116	PWR-GAS-OPTB	ME	NYMEX13	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
167199	PWR-GAS-OPTA	ME	NYMEX14	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
167200	PWR-GAS-ST-SE	ME	NYMEX15	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
166967	PWR-GAS-NW	MJ	NYMEX2	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
166968	PWR-GAS-SW	MJ	NYMEX3	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
166969	PWR-GAS-CALI	MJ	NYMEX4	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
166973	PWR-GAS-MGMT	ME	NYMEX1	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
166962	PWR-GAS-NE	ME	NYMEX4	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
166963	PWR-GAS-MW	ME	NYMEX5	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD
166965	PWR-GAS-ERCOT	ME	NYMEX6	NG	MMBTU	USD	NG/MMBTU/USD

Thanks,
Cecilia
x53362


http://s0ss.baefed.com/dale/

-----Original Message-----
From: Dorland, Chris [mailto:Chris.Dorland@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:17 AM
To: dbrown@natsource.ca
Subject:

I hear your sister is looking for a piece of action so I thought you
might tell her about the kid.

Graduated in 1997 with an HBA from The Richard Ivey School of Business
(University of Western Ontario)

Started at Enron in may 97 as an analyst in the trading group working
for Lavorato doing fundament analysis and acting as Lavo's trading
assistant (slave)

Started out trading BC Cash desk in June of 98.

Moved over to trade short term Aeco in Sept 99. Did that for a year.
Mike McDermott and Laird can let you know if I was any good.

Went to Houston in Sept 2000 to trade east power. Traded Cinergy cash
desk and worked next to Fletch Sturm (Cinergy Term Trader) for a year.
Learned a little bit about trading from him.

You know the rest.

What are her measurements again. 26 36 26

Can that be right?

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


ATTENDED CLASSES AND MEETINGS AND PROVIDED INPUT FOR THE LIVELINK
SYSTEM.                            LEARNED THE LIVELINK SYSTEM AND ASCENT
CAPTURE
SYSTEM.
TRAINED NEW EMPLOYEES AS WELL AS CO-WORKERS ON THE TAGG, DEAL CLEARING,
LIVELINK, ENCOPY, DECAF ll  DATABASES.


Attached are the EGF-Legal dealflow sheets for Q4--in progress and closed
transactions.  Please feel free to contact me or any of the EGF attorneys or
assistants with any questions and/or comments you may have.

Jordan
---------------------- Forwarded by Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 02:39
PM ---------------------------

Darlene C Forsyth
11/22/2000 02:13 PM
To: Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dealflow - 11/22/00


Background information.  I'd like to talk to Ken about making the call. . .
I'll see him at Exec comm today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/14/2000 08:54
AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
08/10/2000 06:11 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CFTC Reauthorization

I agree w/ chris's recommendation- you too?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/10/2000
06:10 PM ---------------------------

Chris Long@ENRON
08/10/2000 05:12 PM

To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: raislerk@sullcrom.com, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CFTC Reauthorization

At his request, I met Lee Sachs, Assistant Treasury Secretary, who had
requested the meeting after a brief conversation recently.  Lee said that
senior-level negotiations led by Secretary Summers were initiated last week
between the CFTC and SEC and that progress was being made on the single stock
futures issue (the major issue postponing movement of the legislation).

As you know, the House completed committee work on HR 4541 before it
recessed.  The bill will now is pending before the Rules Committee where
differences will be worked out between the three different Committee versions
(Agriculture, Commerce, and Banking).  The Senate Agriculture Committee
passed out the Senate version in July.  However, the bill is not moving
quickly in the Senate due to Senator Phil Gramm's desire to see significant
changes made to the legislation (not directly related to our energy
language). Last week at the Republican Convention, I asked the Senator about
the bill and he said they were working on it, but much needs to be changed
for his support.  More telling perhaps, were Wendy Gramm's comments that she
would rather the current bill die if a better bill can be passed next year.
What this means is that we must, at the least, remove Senator Gramm's
opposition to the bill to move the process and more importantly seek to gain
his support of the legislation.

Lee Sachs message was just that.  I told Lee that we shared his desire to
move the legislation as long as it contains a full exclusion for all
non-agriculture commodities (including metals).  He said that we would have a
difficult time defending the metals provision politically. But, Lee said  "we
would not find Treasury opposition to the House Commerce Committee language"
(which includes favourable language on energy and metals).   This is a
positive development, because it isolates the CFTC from its key defenders and
I hope ensures no veto threat on our issues.  However, I do not expect
Treasury to be vocal in support of our position.  It is clear that
Congressional leaders and the Administration want to get this bill done this
year and there remains a good opportunity for enactment.

However, with less than 20 or so legislative days left, we need Senator Gramm
to engage.  A call from Ken Lay in the next two weeks to Senator Gramm could
be an impetus for Gramm to move his staff to resolve the differences.  Gramm
needs to fully understand how helpful the bill is to Enron.  Let me know your
thoughts on this approach.   I am prepared to assist in coordinating the call
and drafting the talking points for a Ken Lay/Sen. Gramm call.


Please let us know what days you will be trading next week for the following products:

	Mon 11/19	Tues 11/20	Wed 11/21
BoM US Nat Gas
BoM +1 US Nat Gas
Day Ahead US Nat Gas
Day Ahead +1 US Nat Gas

	Mon 11/19	Tues 11/20	Wed 11/21
BoM East CAN Nat Gas
BoM +1 East CAN Nat Gas
Day Ahd East CAN Nat Gas
Day Ahd+1 East CAN Nat Gas

Chris
3-7533


Well, if you're going to want someone from Enron, it's going to have to be
me.  Let me know if you're still interested.

	"Delaney Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>
	10/02/2000 04:51 PM
	Please respond to dhunter

		 To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: AB 1890 Retreat

Jeff-
I am putting together a panel at the AB 1890 Retreat on natural gas issues
and would like to include an Enron representative. We are trying to get
folks who are dealing with the nuts and bolts issues, someone on the
ground -- you get the idea - someone from Houston. Below are the details on
the panel:

Tuesday November 14th -- 1:30 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
Natural Gas Issues
Issue: The future cost and availability of natural gas will become a
dominant factor in the generation of electricity in California as more
generation is built in future years. We have seen the natural gas price
increase over 100% in the last fifteen months. Why has the price increased
so dramatically? While the price increases can be expected to spur increased
exploration and drilling, and this supply. Where can California expect to
procure its natural gas supply and at what price over the next five to ten
years? There are now some significant natural gas storage facilities coming
on line - will they help hedge future price volatility? Are independent,
unregulated generators concerned about our natural gas future? Who are the
largest competitors to California for natural gas supply and what will be
the role of new technology in increasing capture of new supply?

Moderator: Keith McCrea

Suggested Panelists:
____________, California Energy Commission (Fuels planner)
____________, El Paso Energy Corporation (Pipeline representative)
____________, Fuels Procurement, Calpine
____________, Enron
____________, Gas Storage Representative
Ed Yates, CA League of Food Processors (customer perspective)

Can you get back to me and let me know if and who could participate from
Enron? Thanks for your help.

Delaney

P.S. You better be planning to attend this year -- at least the day
sessions! :-)


Has Liz finished with gathering the documents?

	melanie.gray@weil.com
	11/13/2000 03:43 PM

		 To: richard.b.sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: PCA

Here are the revised dates for the response/reply/and hearing dates for
Enron's motion to compel.  As you may recall, they say they want a
deposition on the parties'  intention.  We should be expecting a deposition
notice soon if they are going to follow through on their threat.

I passed along to Liz Austin your request regarding pleadings A&K has filed
setting forth the Trustee's position in connection with the
enforcement/nonenforcement of the power contracts and what remedies the
Trustee is seeking.  As you see below, she is pulling those together.

Call to discuss the response to the Trustee's settlement offer.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Melanie Gray/HO/WGM/US on 11/13/2000
03:41 PM ---------------------------

"Austin, Elizabeth J." <EA@PULLCOM.COM> on 11/13/2000 03:35:16 PM
cc:
Subject:  PCA

Hi--Talked to Craig and the Court today.  The motion to compel is now
scheduled for Dec. 12 at 2p.m.  The trustee's oppositon papers are now due
Nov 27 and Enron reply is due Dec 1.  I have my paralegal gathering the
pleadings Enron requested.  That is all for now.--Liz

**********NOTE**********
The information contained in this email message is intended only
for use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify us by telephone (713-546-5000), and destroy the original
message. Thank you.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000
05:06 PM ---------------------------

	Jo Corbitt @ ENRON
	08/08/2000 03:14 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bi-Weekly Meeting w/ Research 8/22

Please be advised that Mr. Rick Buy will NOT attend the
Bi-Weekly Meeting with Research on Tuesday, August 22.

Thank you.


I will be out of the office for most of the day on Friday, October 20.  My
dad is experiencing serious health problems, and he is coming to Houston for
a doctor's appointment with a specialist that I have arranged.  I will be
going with him to the appointment.  I will have my cell phone with me
(713-417-1591) and I will check messages throughout the day.

In my absence, please contact the following persons on Friday regarding
trading operations issues:

Gas Operations  Jeff Gossett  x37306
    Bob Hall  x36956
    Leslie Reeves x37962

Power Operations Jenny Latham x33982
    Leslie Reeves x37962

DPR    Mike Moscoso x35242

MPR    David Maxwell x36983


tham Interactive and Enron Communications to
                                          Provide Streaming Media
Applications for
                                          Powerful Broadband Destinations
                                          11/17  10:24

                                          HOUSTON, Nov. 17 /PRNewswire/ --
Enron Communications, a
                                          wholly-owned subsidiary of Enron
Corp. (NYSE: ENE) and a leader in
                                          the delivery of high- bandwidth
application services, and Gotham
                                          Interactive, a leader in building
and distributing content systems for
                                          broadband networks, announced today
an agreement to provide
                                          broadband multimedia web sites,
high bit rate streaming video and other
                                          e-business applications to
customers in the financial services, media and
                                          entertainment markets. Gotham
Interactive will use Enron
                                          Communications' ePowered Media Cast
service, which provides
                                          TV-quality streaming video delivery
at up to 50 times faster than the
                                          public Internet and provides the
high bit rate applications necessary for
                                          the rich, reliable web site
experience the enterprise demands.

                                          The two companies will jointly
market and sell one-stop media
                                          distribution and integration
solutions to dot com businesses that transmit
                                          high-volume, time sensitive
Internet content. Examples include interactive
                                          video roadshows and streamed video
shareholder announcements in the
                                          financial services sector, and real
time news programs and feature-length
                                          movies in the entertainment and
media market. The joint arrangement
                                          promotes the delivery by Enron and
Gotham Interactive of TV-quality
                                          streaming media to Internet
desktops.

                                          "Enron's unparalleled technology
will help us achieve our goal in
                                          providing web customers with a
rich, fulfilling broadband experience,"
                                          said Michael Sepso, co-CEO of
Gotham Interactive. "We look forward
                                          to combining the advanced Internet
streaming media capabilities of
                                          Enron's ePowered Media Cast Service
with Gotham's technology
                                          acumen and broadband distribution
partner relationships to help us
                                          propel the broadband marketplace,"
continued Rafi Kronzon, co-CEO
                                          of Gotham Interactive.

                                          The enabling network behind
ePowered Media Cast is the Internet
                                          Protocol (IP)-based Enron
Intelligent Networkv. The Enron Intelligent
                                          Network offers enhanced performance
due to its ability to store content
                                          "one-hop" away from the user at the
closest ISP server as well as greater
                                          scaling capability to handle peaks
in demand with extremely high
                                          reliability and quality. Enron's
solution is in contrast to the public
                                          Internet's capabilities to deliver
broadband content, which is often
                                          hampered by packet loss,
interference, and other disruptions that slow
                                          down transmission speed and
compromise the end user's viewing
                                          experience.

                                          "The combined power of Enron's
ePowered Media Cast with Gotham's
                                          broadband design experience will
jumpstart the adoption of
                                          mission-critical applications in
the financial and media sectors. It
                                          exemplifies our ability to
revolutionize the way businesses use the
                                          Internet," said Joe Hirko, CEO of
Enron Communications.

                                          About Gotham Interactive

                                          Gotham Interactive is a leader in
developing innovative broadband
                                          platforms that provide efficient
content delivery to a variety of hardware
                                          devices. In addition to applying
its technical prowess to platform design,
                                          Gotham Interactive is the only
broadband outfit that is committed to
                                          getting its' clients content deals
with the leading broadband distribution
                                          networks. Gotham has several
strategic partners including Veon,
                                          ClearBand and Cisco Systems. Gotham
Interactive is the East Coast
                                          Manager of Cisco's Broadband
Builder's Alliance, an emerging
                                          Broadband trade group.

                                          About Enron Communications

                                          Enron Communications delivers the
Enron Intelligent Networkv, a Pure
                                          IPv broadband overlay to the
Internet and provides rich, multimedia
                                          ePoweredv application services that
enhance online commerce and
                                          communications. Enron
Communications offers ISPs and networks
                                          providers a range of bandwidth
transport solutions that enable businesses
                                          to handle high traffic and high bit
rate needs. A wholly-owned subsidiary
                                          of Enron, Enron Communications can
be found on the web at
                                          www.enron.net.

                                          Enron is one of the world's leading
electricity, natural gas and
                                          communications companies. The
company, which owns approximately
                                          $34 billion in energy and
communications assets, produces electricity and
                                          natural gas, develops, constructs
and operates energy facilities
                                          worldwide, delivers physical
commodities and financial and risk
                                          management services to customers
around the world, and is developing
                                          an intelligent network platform to
facilitate online business. The stock is
                                          traded under the ticker symbol,
"ENE."

                                          Contact: Claudia Johnson of Enron
Communications, 503-833-4435, or
                                          email, claudia_johnson@enron.net;
or John Murphy, email,
                                          jmurphy@mprm.com, or Jim Bolen,
both of mPRm Public Relations,
                                          212-268-3080, for Enron
Communications.


I would like for this product to trade for Sunday and Monday together.  It would be like the Sunday-Monday light load product that now exists except we are stripping out the HE 7-22 on Sunday.  Therefore I would like to include the non-holiday Monday.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  Also, any word on the Pinnacle Peak delivery point?  We do not need to provide a bus as this is a common delivery point.

Thank You,
Holden

-----Original Message-----
From: Hansen, Leslie
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 7:40 AM
To: Walker, Chris; Salisbury, Holden
Subject: RE: 1 more loadshape for West Power

Looks okay so long as Holden confirms that he want the delivery days to cover Sunday and Monday only.  I get Monday if the Monday is a holiday.  Holden, do you also want to cover a non-holiday Monday?

Leslie

-----Original Message-----
From: Walker, Chris
Sent: Thu 10/11/2001 4:02 PM
To: Hansen, Leslie
Cc: Lozano, Melba; Meredith, Kevin
Subject: 1 more loadshape for West Power

Leslie,

Please take a look at this loadshape as well for Hoden Salisbury:

OffPk 8hr  PPT

The transaction is for the hours on each Delivery Day (i) beginning with the hour ending 0100 (12:00 am midnight) and concluding with the hour ending 0600 (6:00 am) and (ii) beginning with the hour ending 2300 (10:00 pm) and concluding with the hour ending 2400 (12:00 am midnight) (8 hours each day) Pacific Prevailing Time.  "Delivery Day" means a day during the term of the transaction that is a Sunday or Monday, including any day that is a NERC holiday.

Thank you,

Chris


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/23/2000
11:42 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ann M Schmidt                           08/23/2000 10:41 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: President Clinton Press Release

Following is a link to the actual White House page with the statement from
Clinton today.


Please see the note from Elizabeth below.

RCR's are now on-line and should be submitted via this on-line format.
Please refrain from using the old form.

Thank you,

gngr
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 10/19/99 04:35
PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Linnell
10/18/99 05:01 PM
To: Joseph Alamo/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Judy
Pearson/HOU/EES@EES, Laurie Knight/DUB/EES@EES, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcia
A Linton/HOU/EES@EES, Margo Reyna/HOU/EES@EES, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chauncy
Hood/DUB/EES@EES, Terri Miller/HOU/EES@EES, Gloria Solis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geriann
Warner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Earlene O'Connell/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jean R
Dressler/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: New Procedure for Projects/RCR's

Please see the attached Word document for directions on a new on-line
procedure for RCR's.  All RCR requests must now be submitted on-line through
the Project Tracking system.  To access the system, click on the first link
below, and a new icon will be added to your Lotus Notes desktop (it has a
picture of a globe).  (Don't click on the other two links, they'll be added
automatically.)    If you have any problems accessing the system, please call
me.  If you have any questions on entering the information, please call me or
Ginger.  Thanks!!

Click on this link  -->     > Gov Affairs
 > Projects
 > Contacts

Instructions:  -->


Attached is a revised summary of the negotiated rate deals done for Q1 vs. max rates.  This was revised to add BP Energy's deal for March.

The revised total between the negotiated rate deals and max rates for Q1 is $9,342,209.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Jan Moore
Enron Transportation Services
713-345-3858
jan.moore@enron.com


what is an 82/82% percent deal?


The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power is refusing to sell outside of
California for less than $250.  This is diminishing liquidity in the market.
However, we can't call FERC and complain because munis are not regulated by
FERC.  Here is an example of something we should be bringing to NW
congressional members re why FERC should regulate the munis.


UCU: Energy Merchant Drives Strong 3Q Earnings; Aquila Transaction By Year
End

* This morning, UtiliCorp reported recurring operating EPS of $0.50,
in-line with our estimate, and a 8.7% increase from $0.46 in the year ago
quarter.
* Results exclude a $44 million or $0.30 per share gain from the IPO
of Uecomm, the telecom arm of their Australian subsidiary United Energy.
* Aquila energy merchant segment remains growth driver; EBIT up 87%
yr./yr., and now contributes 42.1% of UtiliCorp's earnings.
* Aquila expects to begin transacting in the high-growth bandwidth
commodity market in Q4:00 or Q1:01; we see Aquila as one of the
first-movers, behind  Enron and Dynegy (both rated 1H) in this nascent
market.
* We reiterate our 1H (Buy, High Risk) rating and $36 price target for
UtiliCorp.   We feel that a strategic transaction involving Aquila (i.e.
IPO, joint venture)-- expected by the end of the year-- will enable
UtiliCorp to extract Aquila's value as a leading Energy Merchant.
 <<trc75567.pdf>>

Raymond C. Niles
Power/Natural Gas Research
Salomon Smith Barney
(212) 816-2807
ray.niles@ssmb.com

s

 - trc75567.pdf


You are very welcome.  Don't forget about your statement for your phone bill
so we can get that submitted too.  I don't like you paying these bills with
your own money.  I don't know why it bothers me, but it does (per Daphne on
Frasier).

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/31/2001 10:46 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Yes, they are deducting for parking

Thanks.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 05/31/2001 10:45 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Yes, they are deducting for parking

I've got your bar dues in the mail and have tracking numbers.  You are set.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/31/2001 09:03 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Yes, they are deducting for parking

How do I get on the list for the form?  Could you pretty please check for me?

Thanks,

Kay


Anita,

No  problem.

Vince

Anita DuPont@ENRON
08/18/2000 10:27 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: White Wall Board

Shirely:

Amitava wants one of those wall size white marker boards for his office.  How
do I go about ordering one of those?  Anita


Larry,

The copy of the article I mentioned.

Vince


Mike and Frank,

Attached are the quotes for options based on your previous email.  Please
look over the time periods, volumes and strikes.  These quotes are indicitive
based on todays curves.  Let me know if we need to firm up these numbers
tomorrow.  I do have some questions/concerns relating to this deal before
this can be done however, they are:

  1)  Should the volume be a baseload volume of 10,000/day?
  2)  How are you buying your coal for the plant (i.e. fixed, index...)?
  3)  What is the correlation of the SRAC and the Socal Border price
(especially during this time of high volatility)?
  4)  Has there been a calculation of the change in Socal Border vs. the
change in the SRAC to calculate the proper volume to hedge (basically a
delta calculation)?

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.  My phone number is
(713) 853-6247.  Thanks.

John


Mike - Here is the situation.  Between ENA and EES, we sell gas to core and
non-core customers, and also have gas in storage as well as in the park and
lend service.  I think we can be sympathetic to the ORA argument that the
diversion tariff penalties did not anticipate OFOs and EFOs in situations
such as we face here (shortages due to credit problems rather than lack of
supply).  Assessing extreme penalties, as the OFO/EFOs would do, on users who
are not perfectly imbalance under this situation certainly seems unfair.
However, I think we should argue that limiting the payments to
shippers/customers whose gas is diverted to serve core customers to a market
index may not fully compensate for the diversion.  The pay back specifically
does not include interstate pipeline charges, and there may be other costs as
well to the marketer/customer who had supplies taken away.

I need an estimate of the cost to make this filing and follow it up for the
RCR process, and I would also like any feedback anyone has on what our
position should be in this matter.  The response is due Friday.


please confirm that we have not paid any of this bill
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 11:05 AM -----

	Vicki Sharp@EES
	03/15/2001 02:34 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: LeBoeuf lamb bill

I have instructed my assistant to process the January LeBoeuf bill by paying
60 percent of the bill.  This is invoice number 260396 in the amount of
263,556.25.

We can make subsequent adjustments later.