If John Malowney is okay with the confirmation he reviewed, I'm fine.  I made
the changes he suggested and sent it out, so if nothing else needs to be done
for the confirmation, then yes, please add some notes in the comment section
of deal entry about what happened.

Thanks!

   Kate Symes                05/01/2001 06:07 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Montana power

I'm really sorry about the confusion - I actually just got filled in myself.
I entered these deals for Mike Swerzbin yesterday, but he gave me an
incorrect delivery point (mid-columbia instead of montana system border).
Then Cara Semperger, in Scheduling, went in to change the delivery point and
felt that the deal should be combined into one with three legs instead of
three separate deals.

So, in the end, she killed 597244 and 597245, and added two legs to 597246.
I'm not sure she talked to John Malowney about any of this, otherwise he
probably would have told her that he already approved the confirm letter.

Please let me know if you'd like comments added to this deal, and I'll do it
right away.

Thanks for your help on this,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           05/01/2001 03:30 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Montana power

Help, I'm confused!  Yesterday I prepared a confirmation for three Montana
Power deals, # 5467244, 597245, 597246.  I sent it to John Malowney and he
approved it and I faxed it out. Today I noticed two of the deals have been
killed and two legs added to the other deal.  I think it is the same deal,
but can someone put notes into the deals saying what they did and why?

Thanks!


Kim:  Do I need to review the letters?  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Theriot, Kim S.
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 4:29 PM
To:	Berkeland, Bill
Cc:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Shackleton, Sara; Aucoin, Evelyn; Miroballi, Angelo
Subject:	Update Pricing Spreadsheet

See attached pricing spreadsheet.  We received two additional signed letters today.

Kim

 << File: Mkt. Disruption Tracking.xls >>


Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save(R) E-mail Update for
December 12, 2000

****************************************************************
Your Freedom to Travel This Week Includes

I. Click 'n Save Internet Specials
II. HOT! Double Credit Offer if you reserve and
 rent your Rental Car on southwest.com
III. Southwest Airlines Vacations Las Vegas Special
IV. Click 'n Save Subscriber Information
V. SWABIZ - Company Online Booking and Tracking

********* SOUTHWEST.COM ONLY SPECIALS *********

I.  Check out our Weekly Click 'n Save Specials.

*21-day advance purchase with the first day of travel
 on January 2, 2001 through the end of the current schedule.
*Purchase beginning December 12 through
 December 14, 2000, midnight Pacific Time.
*Click 'n Save Internet Specials are available one-way or
 may be combined with all other fares.
 When combining with other fares, the
 most restrictive fare rules apply.
*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers)
 once purchased will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Scroll down for more details!

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of up to $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip.
Fares shown are each way.

Albany, NY
 $48 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Albuquerque, NM
 $38 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $68 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $62 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $40 each way to/from Lubbock, TX

Amarillo, TX
 $38 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $99 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

Austin, TX
 $71 each way to/from New Orleans, LA
 $51 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $34 each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $61 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Birmingham, AL
 $68 each way to/from Kansas City, MO

Boise, ID
 $66 each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $36 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Buffalo, NY
 $34 each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $68 each way to/from Louisville, KY

Burbank, CA
 $68 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $66 each way to/from Boise, ID

Chicago, IL (Midway)
 $99 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $55 each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Cleveland, OH
 $62 each way to/from Providence, RI

Columbus, OH
 $55 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Corpus Christi, TX
 $38 each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)

Dallas, TX  (Love Field)
 $36 each way to/from Lubbock, TX
 $36 each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK

Detroit, MI
 $99 each way to/from New Orleans, LA

El Paso, TX
 $99 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $40 each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $99 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Ft. Lauderdale, FL
 $34 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $34 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $99 each way to/from Chicago, IL (Midway)

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $99 each way to/from Indianapolis, IN

Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $54 each way to/from Little Rock, AR
 $56 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $38 each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $99 each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $54 each way to/from Little Rock, AR
 $36 each way to/from San Antonio, TX
 $56 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Indianapolis, IN
 $99 each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA

Jackson, MS
 $99 each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Jacksonville, FL
 $34 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale, FL
 $34 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Kansas City, MO
 $68 each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $99 each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $99 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Las Vegas, NV
 $62 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $99 each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99 each way to/from New Orleans, LA
 $34 each way to/from Ontario, CA
 $36 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $39 each way to/from San Diego, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $54 each way to/from Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $54 each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $55 each way to/from Chicago, IL (Midway)

Los Angeles, CA
 $99 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $34 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $49 each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $34 each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Louisville, KY
 $68 each way to/from Buffalo, NY

Lubbock, TX
 $40 each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $36 each way to/from Dallas, TX  (Love Field)

Manchester, NH
 $99 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $40 each way to/from El Paso, TX

Nashville, TN
 $55 each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $99 each way to/from Manchester, NH
 $55 each way to/from Omaha, NE
 $99 each way to/from San Francisco, CA

New Orleans, LA
 $71 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $99 each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $99 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

Oakland, CA
 $34 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Oklahoma City, OK
 $51 each way to/from Austin, TX
 $36 each way to/from Dallas, TX  (Love Field)

Omaha, NE
 $55 each way to/from Nashville, TN

Ontario, CA
 $34 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

Orlando, FL
 $34 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale, FL
 $99 each way to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $34 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL
 Note: West Palm Beach service begins January 21, 2001

Phoenix, AZ
 $99 each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $36 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $34 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $99 each way to/from Orlando, FL

Portland, OR
 $42 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Providence, RI
 $62 each way to/from Cleveland, OH

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $48 each way to/from Albany, NY

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $36 each way to/from Boise, ID
 $34 each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $42 each way to/from Portland, OR
 $47 each way to/from Seattle, WA
 $52 each way to/from Spokane, WA

Sacramento, CA
 $99 each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Salt Lake City, UT
 $49 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA

San Antonio, TX
 $36 each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $99 each way to/from San Jose, CA

San Diego, CA
 $99 each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $39 each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

San Francisco, CA
 $99 each way to/from Nashville, TN

San Jose, CA
 $99 each way to/from San Antonio, TX

Seattle, WA
 $47 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Spokane, WA
 $52 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

St. Louis, MO
 $61 each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $99 each way to/from Jackson, MS

Tampa Bay, FL
 $34 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $34 each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL
 Note: West Palm Beach service begins January 21, 2001

Tucson, AZ
 $34 each way to/from Los Angeles, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $56 each way to/from Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $56 each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $99 each way to/from Sacramento, CA

West Palm Beach, FL
 $34 each way to/from Orlando, FL
 $34 each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL
 Note: West Palm Beach service begins January 21, 2001

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials
Other Terms and Conditions:

Tickets must be purchased through the Southwest Airlines
web site at http://www.southwest.com/ The fares listed
above are per person for each way of travel.
Fares listed are for general information only and
are not a reflection of current seat availability. Travel
may originate in either direction.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. *Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials may be combined with
all other fares. When combining with other fares, the
most restrictive fare rules apply. Seats are limited
and won't be available on some flights that operate
during very busy travel times and holiday periods.

Changes to any portion of the reservation
(flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers)
once purchased will result in the cancellation of
the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
fare available which could result in a fare increase.
Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
full unrestricted fare.

Of course, if your favorite city is not listed, we have many
other incredible fares to all Southwest cities. To find more
great fares on Southwest Airlines, please visit Reservations
or check our Fares Information online at
http://www.southwest.com/

*****ANNOUNCING! RENTAL CAR AVAILABILITY*****
II. Reserve and rent your car on southwest.com and
receive double credit for your rental in addition to the
double flight credits you already receive for your flights.
Receiving a free Award Ticket just got easier.
Check out this special offer at :
http://www.southwest.com/rapid_rewards/rr_promotions.html

*********SOUTHWEST AIRLINES VACATIONS*********
III. Sensational Vegas Vacation for Two Adults from
Albuquerque, Burbank, Los Angeles, Ontario, Oakland,
Phoenix, Salt Lake City, San Diego, San Francisco,
San Jose, and Sacramento.
Packages include roundtrip air, two nights hotel, Rapid
Rewards credit, and 24-Hour traveler assistance.  Offer valid for
travel November 1, 2000 - March 15, 2001.  Purchase by
December 31, 2000. Certain blackout dates apply. To check out
our spectacular prices, please visit us at:
http://www.swavacations.com/landslide.htm

************ SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION **************
IV. Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines
Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and re-subscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save email updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

************************** SWABIZ *************************
V. Company Travel Managers can book and track
their company's business travel on SWABIZ. To find
out more about this FREE service, simply visit:
http://www.southwest.com/swabiz/?src=cnswabiz

***************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: [mark.guzman@enron.com]
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 12/28/99 09:04
AM ---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/28/99 07:52:30 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2000 NUMBERS

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/28/99
07:57 AM ---------------------------

Heidi Boyd
12/27/99 04:30 PM

To: Joann Collins/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joni
Veselack/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: 2000 NUMBERS

Hi Everybody,

I haven't input my CPA 8 numbers yet, I am still sorting them into market
areas.  I am not sure that my numbers are correct due to production and
wholesale issues.  I am hoping to have a couple of people look over my work,
but so far they have been unavailable when I finally got my numbers together.

I appreciate your patience and apologize for the inconvenience.

Thanks.


Please read the most  recent FERC proposal that is in your inbox .    This
proposal discusses a maximum sales price of $150.    Any sale made in excess
of this price would be subject to review for justification of such cost.
This means that Enron would have to file with the FERC every we sold in
excess of this number.
The proposal is unclear when this requirement would be in effect.   We will
provide more information as it becomes available.

Until that time,  do not submit bids to SELL for greater than $150.   This
includes P/X bids for Service Customers.
I am of the opinion that if we buy from LA for $225 then we should be able to
justify bidding in to California at  > $225.   However,   we would still have
to file and explain this trade.

Once again,  I will let you know when more information becomes available.

Thanks,
JMF


Please note per Alan's request that a conference call has been *tentatively*
scheduled for today, on the topic as noted on the subject line above, for
1:00 PM PST/3:00 PM CST/4:00 PM EST.

Please advise me soonest of your availability in order to facilitate
confirming this call can occur as scheduled.

Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Admin. Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA

Alan Comnes@ECT
03/20/2001 10:05 AM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Draft FERC Comments

Joseph,

Can you work with Sue to set up a meeting?  Anytime 1 p.m. or later is ok
with me.  Call should include Hartsoe, Alverez (works for Hartsoe), Mary
Hain, Steffes (if available).

Alan Comnes

Susan J Mara@ENRON
03/20/2001 09:50 AM
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Draft FERC Comments

Let's get together later today on the phone and discuss where we are with
EPSa, WPTF and what if anything enron should file.  ALso new guy in DC office
-- Ray alvarez -- need to get him involved

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 09:49 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	03/19/2001 06:03 PM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Bob_Anderson@apses.com>, <berry@apx.com>,
<billr@calpine.com>, <MMilner@coral-energy.com>, <rreilley@coral-energy.com>,
<gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<mark_j_smith@fpl.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <steve.huhman@mirant.com>,
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, <bzycher@rand.org>,
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, <roger.pelote@williams.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft FERC Comments

Attached is a preliminary first draft of the WPTF comments to be filed on
Thursday with regard to the FERC Staff's market monitoring proposal.? It is
essentially based on Ben Zycher's draft paper concerning this issue.? Ben
has made a number of astute economic arguments in response to their
proposal.? In several areas, questions?are indicated, or a suggestion  that
there is a need for additional material to support the statements  made.?
?
It would be helpful to see the drafts in progress by other WPTF  members.? By
reviewing them we can make sure that inconsistent observations  are not made
and WPTF's own filing can be enriched by additional policy  arguments
concerning the staff proposal.
?
Dan
 - 3-22-01 WPTF Comments - Draft 1.doc


Sheila and Tom need to know the status.  Please advise them mid-day.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	03/28/2001 10:04 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Hi Sara and Sheila,

By way of update, I was able to get the guaranty to Clem and am working on
his getting it back to me by the end of the day.  I talked to Bear Stearn's
lawyer today about whether we could get the other agreements (account and
assignment) executed today and she represented that (1) she is still waiting
for her Managing Director's approval of her final draft in order to forward
it to me (2) but that she is working with me to check in with the MD every
hour or so for a status update.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	03/27/2001 06:59 PM

		 To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Wednesday, March 28 is the target execution date for the ECI customer
agreement and assignment (from ENA) of the Securities Loan Agreement/credit
book.  I am not certain if Cheryl was able to expedite delivery of the new
ENE guaranty.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Sheila Glover
	03/27/2001 02:10 AM

		 To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT
		 Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Tom,
The day i received this I responded to Sara and cc'd richard that I was okay
with transferring the Stock Loan Agreement from ENA to ECI.  The ENA was
executed and the ECI piece is what is in process.

Sara,
Any update?  How far are we away from exectution?  Do you need anything from
anyone?

Thanks. Sheila

Tom Doukas@ENRON
03/26/2001 11:59 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate@ECT,
Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Just wanted to follow up to see if we have a time frame as to when the letter
will be fully executed.

Thanks,

Tom

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 03/22/2001 08:41 AM
To: Tom Doukas/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate,
Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: BEAR Guarantee letter

Here's a recap for everyone.
Our original negotiation with Bear (for the Securities Loan Agreement) was in
the name of ENA, and, ENA had an existing account agreement with Bear.
However, Bear insisted that the account agreement was "too old" and that we
negotiate a new agreement.  I agreed on the condition that this not hold up
execution of the Securities Loan Agreement.  We have one or two final points
remaining on the new account agreement which we'll execute for both ENA and
Enron Credit Inc.. ("ECI").  We have the authorized trader list for ECI and
are waiting for Richard to designate the new officer/director slate but we
are prepared for execution by the existing officers in London.  The
assignment instrument will be very short for transferring the ECI book from
ENA to ECI.  It will take only a few days to replace the existing ENE
guaranty for the Securities Loan Agreement.

Jeff and Sheila:  Please verify that both ENA and ECI do not  need the
Securities Loan Agreement.  I believe it is just ECI and we can transfer the
existing agreement to ECI.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Tom Doukas@ENRON
	03/21/2001 12:28 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeff Kinneman/Enron@EnronXGate, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Sage/LON/ECT@ECT, David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: BEAR Guarantee letter

Sara,

I just spoke with Russ Miron from Bear Sterans regarding our Guaranty to
Reduce funding to 20% per side.

I had asked him about when they will be executing the agreement.  He said
that his lawyers are ready to sign but are under the impression that you have
one remaining point to resolve and that this point is holding up the
finalization of the agreement.

Is there an issue from our side?  If not we should be able to get this
execution taken care of immediately?

Thanks,

Tom
713-853-9074


Jeff Skilling just resigned.  DO you think Martin's retirement  speech had any impact? See ya tonight

Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349


Carol, thanks.

Anne:  we need to send this list to AEP to ensure they agree that this is the
extent of our "Books and Records" obligations at Close.

Thanks,
Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Gilley, Carolyn
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 7:04 PM
To: Beck, Sally; Redmond, Brian
Cc: Apollo, Beth; Scribner, James
Subject: HPL Books and Records

Sally and Brian,
Per my conversation with Brian regarding HPL books and records to be turned
over to AEP, we will complete the identification and inventory report of
records to be turned over by close of business Thursday, April 26, 2001.  We
will continue to track and monitor the location of these records during the
transition of personnel from Enron to AEP.  In order to ensure delivery of
the HPL/AEP Records Transfer List, we have increased the resources from three
to ten individuals.

Please call me if you need further clarification or have any comments or
concerns.

Thank you,
Carolyn Gilley
Ext. 35237


David,

Please change the date on the draft so that we won't confuse it with the
prior drafts.

I would delete "specifically" from 2.10 (c), and add "or later ratify such
transaction" (or something to that effect), just in case they later learn and
accept the transaction.

In 2.10 (x), add to "due to an inability to pay, or other credit reason".  In
(y), add "or a contractual defense to payment" [could be force majeure, etc]

Again in 2.10, third sentence from the end "any interest, penalties,
attorneys fees and court costspayable by the Hub Shipper...;

3.3  Delete "prior" before "approval", and add "or ratification" in the
redlined section on refunds.

Thanks,

Kay


Hi guys,

I need the ABB contract and the PDA at your earliest convenience so that I
can work on the documents we discussed.

Thanks,

Kay


Daren,

On the above mentioned dates, there was no nomination at the Enerfin meter.

6/3/99 and 6/8/99 revealed activity for ENA (202K).  Can the deal be extended
for 6/4 (548 dec.) and 6/9 (40 dec.) to cover this flow so that Volume
Management can create an accounting arrangement for these two days?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


As requested.


A Coalition of Energy Service Providers (including Enron's retail coalition
-- Alliance for Retail Energy Markets) and customer groups (including some of
Enron's large customers) have prepared this language and submitted it to
Senator Debra Bowen.

Strike the last two sentences of Section 80110 that currently reads:

Insert the following language at the end of Section 80110:

The commission shall implement subscription protocols for the power supplied
by the department in accordance with the following:
a) The right of residential and small commercial customers to elect an
alternate provider for retail service shall not be restricted by this section.
b) The right of large commercial and industrial customers to elect service
from an alternate provider for retail service shall not be limited until such
time as the department has fully satisfied the net short position of the
respective electrical corporation with long-term contracts.  The department
shall provide public notice when the department has fully satisfied the net
short position of an electrical corporation.  This event shall be deemed to
be the close of the initial subscription period for the applicable electrical
corporation.
c) If, after the initial subscription period has closed, a large commercial
or industrial customer elects to leave the department service, the department
may impose a fee equal to the incremental costs imposed on the portfolio that
are directly related to the load of the departing customer.
d) Upon conclusion of the initial subscription period, the department shall
notify all large commercial and industrial customers no less than six months
in advance of the lapse of any long-term contract.  Upon such notice large
commercial and industrial customers shall have the right to elect an
alternate provider without being subject to the surcharge set forth in
sub-section (c).  This event shall be deemed to be an open subscription
period and shall remain in effect until such time as the aggregated demand of
all customers electing an alternative provider exceeds the capacity of the
lapsing contract.  This event shall be deemed to be an open subscription
period.
e) If a large commercial or industrial customer requests service from the
department after the initial subscription period or outside of an open
subscription period, the department may impose a fee equal to the incremental
costs imposed on the portfolio that are directly related to the load of the
returning customer, taking into account prospects for load growth in its
customer base, compared to the total value of the portfolio of energy used to
serve the customer.
f) Customers that have elected to take service from the department after the
initial subscription period or outside of an open subscription period shall
be required to take service from the department for a minimum of one year.
g) Any new customer to the service territory of an electrical corporation
shall have the opportunity to elect service from the department without being
subject to sub-section (e).
h) Any new customer shall have the opportunity to elect service from an
alternative provider during the first 120 days from the date of service
initiation without being subject to sub-section (c).
i) For purposes of this section, residential and small commercial customers
shall be defined as customers with demands less than 100 kW.
j) For purposes of this section, commercial and industrial customers shall be
defined as customers with demands equal to or greater than 100 kW.
k) For purposes of this section, a long-term contract shall be defined as a
contract for energy greater than or equal to one-year in length.
l) For purposes of this section, incremental costs shall be defined as the
costs that the department cannot reasonably avoid until such time as one or
more long-term contracts expire


I forgot one deferral that came through as a PMA in 0003 GL.  Please defer
$18,933 in expense(revenue entry) for Southern Union, production month 9911.
Shout with any questions.  Thanks.
PL


Pat,

Please prepare a Comparite of the 2 attached files and deliver to Ozzie,
Heather and Gerald as early as possible on Monday morning; the 2.9.01 is my
latest  revision.  The Word comparison that I tried to do was crappy as per
usual.

We need to get this document into Wayne Gresham's hands as soon as we can on
Monday, but I don't want to send it to Wayne until Ozzie and Heather have
approved the language changes to Sections 2.3, 3.5, and 3.8, (and elsewher).
If Ozzie or Heather require changes, please get Gerald to assist with the
drafting.  I'll be checking in to see how things are going around 9:00
Houston time.  I want to dictate a cover memo to you for use in relaying the
final blackline to Wayne Gresham.  Pleae remind me to do that when I call in.

Steve


Dear PMA Subscriber-- We're pleased to present a recent issue of The Risk Desk.   To see this sample, download:http://www.pmaconference.com/0111Risk.pdf
This monthly on energy trading risk management is by far the most readable, and altogether useful publication on this critical subject.
Through a special arrangement with the publisher, you can subscribe to one-year of the Risk Desk for the one-time low rate of $299.
This is the last time you will see this rate in 2001! Corporate-wide site licenses are also available for $2,500.
Regards, PMA Staff This email was sent to vince.j.kaminski@enron.com, at your request, by  PowerMarketers.com .
Visit our Subscription Center to edit  your interests or unsubscribe .
View our privacy policy .

Powered by
Constant Contact


Here we go (?)

Calif Small Generator:To Sign SoCal Ed Bankruptcy Filing
By Mark Golden

03/15/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- One of California's small independent electricity
producers, Coram Energy Group Ltd., will sign an involuntary bankruptcy
petition Thursday against Edison International (EIX) unit Southern California
Edison, the owner of the company said.

The petition is being circulated to five other companies and lists the amount
of money each is owed by the utility, Coram's Brian O'Sullivan told Dow Jones
Newswires. O'Sullivan wouldn't name the other companies on the petition, but
said that they are all "qualifying facilities" as the small generating plants
are called.

The petition, known as a Form 5, could be filed in U.S. bankruptcy court in
Los Angeles as soon as next week, O'Sullivan said.

"I would have liked to have done it myself some time ago, but I couldn't do
it on my own," said O'Sullivan, who received the papers for signing
Wednesday. "(The) planets are in line for this to be filed in court. They
would have to be knocked out of line somehow for this not to be filed."

O'Sullivan said he would have preferred not to pursue a bankruptcy
proceeding, but is running out of cash and will have to shut down his
operations in about a month. That situation, combined with the stalling of
legislation in the California Senate to deal with the qualifying facilities,
have left O'Sullivan with no other option, he said.

Qualifying facilities, from which U.S. utilities have had to buy power since
the 1970s under federal law, supply California with almost 30% of its power.
Southern California Edison hasn't paid these producers for months.

FPL Group (FPL), which owns several qualifying facilities in SCE's territory,
also may join the group to initiate involuntary bankruptcy proceedings.

"We are considering it, but haven't made a determination of whether we would
join such a petition," said FPL spokeswoman Carol Klaussen. "It's extremely
frustrating to us. We continue to supply electricity to the people of
California, but we haven't been paid since November."

As reported, California Assemblyman Fred Keely, D-Boulder Creek, said
legislation to restructure the rates qualifying facilities charge utilities
for electricity is unlikely to be passed by the state's Legislature. Keely,
who is Assembly speaker pro tem and a co-sponsor of the measure, SB47X, said
the bill is still being heard in the Senate's Energy Committee, but the
committee's chairwoman, Sen. Debra Bowen, has no intention of taking up the
bill any time soon, an aide in her office said.

The stalled legislation would reduce the rates charged by the state's
qualifying facilities to about 8 cents a kilowatt-hour from the 17 cents a
kilowatt-hour they've charged over the past few months. It would also
establish a schedule of payments the utilities must make to the qualifying
facilities. The small generators are owed a combined $1 billion from Southern
California Edison and PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas & Electric.

O'Sullivan said that his and several other companies can't wait any longer.

"From the beginning, I've been hearing, 'Oh, you guys won't start a
bankruptcy proceeding.' And we didn't do it, because SB47x, we were told,
would solve our problem. It was a good faith attempt by us to be part of the
solution," he said. "Why Bowen stopped it, I don't know."

Southern California Edison owes Coram $350,000, O'Sullivan said. He's got
$41,000 in the bank, and has stopped paying most of his bills with the
exception of salaries for his seven staff members and several other
absolutely necessary payments.

"That leaves me with about a month of cash," he said.

But his legal fees would quickly have surpassed the amount he is owed if he
were to have taken the utility to court alone.

"I've got to join with someone who is significantly larger than me," he said.
"That opportunity has arisen."

O'Sullivan wouldn't name the larger company, which he said will make the
final decision about when and if to bring involuntary bankruptcy proceedings
against Southern California Edison.

"This could be the biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history, and you can't do it
without spending the next couple of years in court," O'Sullivan said. "This
is not anything I want to do, but I don't have any choice."

-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com

(Jason Leopold in Los Angeles contributed to this article.)

An Edison International spokesman declined to comment specifically on the
petition, as the company hadn't seen it. But he said Edison still aims to
avoid bankruptcy and plans to pay its bills once it's able to do so.

"We're doing our best to avoid bankruptcy," the spokesman said. "We don't
believe bankruptcy serves anyone's purposes. We fully intend to pay our bills
once this situation is resolved."

-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com

(Jason Leopold in Los Angeles contributed to this article.)

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


it attracks them w/in sq 100 yards
they give the equivalent # per sguare tblspoon...
they have gottne better w/ no rain - but i'm often more attractive than the magnet - and that hurts...
Nathalie
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "benjamin" <benjamin@wt.net>
Reply-To: emca@yahoogroups.com
Date:  Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:19:14 -0600

>All the many neighbors in the energy industry appreciate
>this further utilitization of gas resources!  Ah, the
>wonders of hydrocarbons.
>
>My question for Nathalie is : how long did it take you to
>count the 20,000 mosquito carcasses?
>
>My request for Gayle is: please keep away from our house as
>we do not need a mosquito magnet drawing them over to our
>place.
>
>In honesty though, the mosquitos were really bad when it was
>wet out but I haven't seen one in weeks.  Maybe the problem
>is just people opening doors and windows to the cooler
>weather and letting them in the house.  Time to check those
>screens!
>
>B.
>
>> there are several websites - mostly distributed by gas
>> companies.
>> it runs on propane, attracts mosquitoes then sucks them
>> into a net where they die from dehydration. you change the
>> tanks and the net and a special attractant agent every 3
>> wks. its safe for kids and the environment. I caught
>> ~20,000 the 1st week after the floods.... about 10,000
>> most of the times afterwards. theoretically mosquitoes
>> stay in a local area...
>> check out the websites
>> Nathalie
>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>   From: Ed Gonzales
>>   To: emca@yahoogroups.com
>>   Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:24 PM
>>   Subject: Re: *EMCA* Mosquitoes
>>
>>
>>    Mosquito magnet? Please explain, decribe. Does it
>> really work?
>>   Ed ....Neartown Assoc prez
>>     ----- Original Message -----
>>     From: zaeza
>>     To: emca@yahoogroups.com
>>     Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:51 PM
>>     Subject: Re: *EMCA* Mosquitoes
>>
>>
>>     I  bought a mosquito magnet - it works wonders
>>     expensive, but good!
>>     Nathalie
>>     Bomar
>>
>>       ----- Original Message -----
>>       From: Amy & Alistair
>>       To: emca@yahoogroups.com
>>       Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:30 PM
>>       Subject: *EMCA* Mosquitoes
>>
>>
>>       I hate to do this, and do not want to put anyone
>> out, but I need some help.
>>
>>       The mosquitoes are terrible.  It is hurting me to
>> look at Kendall (my son) any more, as the number of bites
>> on him have gone into the double digits.
>>
>>       I cannot imagine that we are the only ones suffering
>> from these nasty little pests, and I want to do something
>> about it.
>>
>>       If any of you have time tomorrow, can you do me this
>> - can you call Harris County Mosquito Control and help me
>> complain?  I figure that if a whole load of us start
>> calling, they won't be able to ignore us.
>>
>>       Their number is 713-440-4800.  I get a recording
>> when I call, but their hours are 8 - 5, so maybe we can
>> talk to a live person tomorrow.
>>
>>       Thank you for helping me, and ultimately helping
>> everyone.
>>
>>       Best Regards,
>>
>>       Amy Barnes
>>
>>
>>       To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>       emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>>
>>
>>
>>       Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
>> Terms of Service.
>>
>>
>>
>>     To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>     emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>>
>>
>>
>>     Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
>> Terms of Service.
>>
>>
>>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>>               ADVERTISEMENT
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>>   emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>>
>>
>>
>>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
>> of Service.
>>
>>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Gi0tnD/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/NoOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Kim:

Legal and credit have never responded on this one since there was no activity.  We will have to do a comparison of the CP form.  We also need credit since nothing has happened since 1999.

Can you resend the email version which Salt River sent to you?

Jay and/or Tracy:  Who will prepare credit?

Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:28 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement

Sara,

Mark Russell of Salt River Project sent me their ISDA documents last week.  Can we take a look at them and make the changes we would like to incorporate?  He called this morning and they are considering financial transactions with us.  Please give me a call and let me know where we stand with this when you get a chance.  If I should send it on to some one else.  Please let me know that as well.

Thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	marussel@srpnet.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-marussel+40srpnet+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 4:12 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement

I would like to begin working on an ISDA, I have attached our standard form
schedule and CSA for your review.  I think this is a good window of
opportunity.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim.Ward@enron.com [mailto:Kim.Ward@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 9:13 AM
To: marussel@srpnet.com
Subject: Re: FW: Master purchase/sale agreement

Mark,

The best person to talk to about the ISDA is me.  I discussed an ISDA with
Tim Roberts when I was in the Salt River offices on March 23rd.  A draft
ISDA was sent to Bill Abraham on November 17, 1999.  I requested for a new
legal review on 3/28/01.  Let me know if you need a new draft and I can
send you or Tim a copy.  My number is 713-853-0685.

Thanks for your inquiry -

Kim Ward

marussel@srpnet.com on 04/05/2001 08:20:15 AM

To:   <Kim.Ward@enron.com>
cc:   <marussel@srpnet.com>
Subject:  FW: Master purchase/sale agreement

I have been trying to get an ISDA going with Enron for several months. Who
is the best contact to call?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim.Ward@enron.com [mailto:Kim.Ward@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:59 PM
To: kaprice@srpnet.com
Subject: Master purchase/sale agreement

Kent,

Attached is a draft copy of our Master Purchase/Sale Agreement for physical
natural gas transactions.  As I mentioned before, we can enter into
transactions for less that one year out.  However, for those outside of a
year and for longer terms, we need to have a master in place.  Hopefully,
we can get this one in place so that we will be prepared when/if we get
ready to transact.

Let me know if you have any questions.  I will have our legal guys standing
by to help, too.

Thanks,

Kim Ward

(See attached file: Master_NG_draft_contract.doc)

(See attached file: Master_NG_draft_contract.doc)

 - 070301.sample Paragraph13 credit annex isda.doc << File: 070301.sample Paragraph13 credit annex isda.doc >>
 - 062701.sample isda schedule.doc << File: 062701.sample isda schedule.doc >>


what does this mean?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	enron_update@concureworkplace.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-enron+5Fupdate+40concureworkplace+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	Expense Report Payment Stoppage Notification

You have more than 2 report(s) with receipts outstanding

You are only allowed 2 reports with receipts outstanding.  Your expense reports will not be paid until you meet this requirement.


can you make reservations for 7:00 at beef and bird?

thanks,
e

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 04/04/2001 12:31:40 PM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Yes!

Hi Eric,
?
We would love to join you and Shanna for  dinner.? Let us know when and
where.? Look forward to it.?  LU-M


Hi Vince, Paulo Oleira (one of the M.I.T attending our meeting on wed)'s
research interest turned out to be a match for April Hodgeson (VP of content
origination). I had him talk to April (Stinson was on the call as well) to
discuss his research interest and what he would likely to do for April.  I
suggested (and April agrees) that Paulo would intern with her and Matt and
perform research on how end users (consumers and business) improved
experience with ePowered content can be quantified.  This may include
performing control experiments at M.I.T.  We decided not to over specify what
he would do since it is likely to change as soon as he arrives.  I suggested
once he starts, he will work with April and Matt Harris (VP enterprise
origination) and they will define what the student needs to complete for the
internship.

Addiontionally, Tom Gros agrees that this type of research are needed and
this is a great way to start.

I will proceed to have recruiting contact the student with an offer to start
around May 22, 2000 unless someone tells me otherwise.

Regards,

Ravi.

P.S. Charlene, please include Paulo in your May 22, 2000 start group.  Paulo
will report to me within EBS research group but will work on a day-to-day
basis with April and Matt. As you've mentioned that compensation is somewhat
fixed but please keep in mind that this person is a PhD candidate with very
specialized skill set. Please contact Vince before extending an offer that
may be too low, etc.

----- Forwarded by Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications on 02/17/00 09:27
AM -----

	Charlene Jackson@ENRON
	02/17/00 08:25 AM

		 To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ravi
Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Summer Internship Position

Celeste,

We need to make sure that the interns in Vince's group are coordinated and
incorporated with the rest of the summer associates.  They should be offered
the same starting dates, I believe they are May 22, 2000 June 5, 2000.  I am
not sure about the June date.  Would you check and let Vince know.  They
should also be offered the same starting salary package as the others.  They
will be included in training (a few days) and any other events we host.
Thanks


I spent 3 hours on this matter in Jan, Feb

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Laynie East                           05/01/2000 10:31 AM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ECP Time for Jan. & Feb.

Richard,

I will be sending the East Coast Power invoice for January and February this
week.  Bob Carter thought you had some time to include for this period so I
wanted to check with you once more before sending the invoice.

Thanks,
Laynie
x3-3131


Bruce,

Can you stop by and set up my reuters.

Phillip


Here's the email that I mentioned in my voicemail.  Take care, Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From:  james.doty@bakerbotts.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-james+2Edoty+40bakerbotts+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:08 AM
To: mmetts@enron.com
Subject: SEC Chairmanship and James R. Doty

  Mark:  If this is not what you had in mind, let me know. I have tried to
give you some detail to back up my claim that I can provided much-needed
stature and leadership to the SEC. I am also addressing what I think may be
some of the objections of constituencies in the corporate and financial
community who have, I believe,  told the Administration not to appoint a
lawyer and former member of the Staff of the SEC. (Of course, Arthur Levitt
was not a lawyer, and was a former head of the Amex, and has rammed through
one of the mose activist regulatory programs in SEC history! So what I am
offering, in part, is balance and respect for process).

1. The President has the opportunity, by appointing Jim Doty, to get the SEC
headed in a direction the corporate and financial community wants and to do
so with broad (indeed, enthusiastic) support from the agency itself, the
corporate and securities bar, the accounting profession and other
constituencies (including the NASDAQ, the NYSE, members of the Congressional
oversight committees and their staff on both sides of the aisle).

 Doty knows securities markets and practices through his work for securities
firms and is well aware of the issues of market structure that will face the
new Chairman--in this he favors continuing to encourage competition and
technological innovation in the markets, and is committed to keeping our
capital markets the best in the world.

 He understands the problems the accounting profession and the
standard-setting bodies are facing--including international accounting
standard issues--and is well equipped to be sure the private standard
setting regime we have relied on works well and with sensitivity to current
realities.  He will not be a "grenade thrower" on the complex
pooling/purchase issues now confronting the SEC and the FASB. (Here it will
be particularly important that the next Chariman give the FASB proposals on
impairment of goodwill in purchase transactions a fair hearing, and not
attempt to "strong arm" the private standard setters into a requiring
accelerated depreciation of goodwill: this is especially critical given the
fragile state of the technology sector.)

 Doty has spent his career advising boards of directors and senior
management on the practical problems businessmen face in dealing with the
SEC. He will bring to the job hands-on experience working with the business
community(corporate and financial), in solving the problems they face in
raising capital and complying with securities regulatory regimes--State,
Federal and cross-border.

 2. Doty has a national reputation as a corporate- and securities- law
expert, has published and is in demand as a speaker.  As a practicing
lawyer, however, Doty would bring some extraordinary qualifications to the
job of running the SEC, which are as folows:

          a. His record as General Counsel of the SEC from 1990-92
demonstrates an understanding of how to work effectively in governmnet.
Doty has the respect of the Staff and will bring credibility within the
building to accomplish needed reform.  During his tenure as the SEC's
General Counsel, with a Democratic majority in Congress, he had a major role
in reform initiatives to reduce costs of raising capital and streamline the
financial regulatory structure under President George H.W.Bush. These
included the Small Business Initiative, which reduced costs for small- and
first-time registrants, and structured finance initiatives to provide more
efficient access to capital markets for seasoned issuers.

          b. Doty is committed to using the exemptive authority under the
Securities Act of 1933 to promote more efficiency and lower costs in the
capital-formation process.  He knows where additional exemptive action or
repeal is needed--as in the Public Utility Holding Company Act, for
example--and he will be a knowledgeable and effective ally of the
Administration, including Cabinet officers, and the Republicans on the Hill,
in promoting further reform and efficiency.

         c. Doty will get the agency behind the President's proposal to
create individual retirement investment accounts for all members of the
workforce.  He is committed to helping the Administration get this done when
they decide to push for it, and knows how the issues of safety can be
practically addressed and the technical objections of critics overcome.

          d. Doty is a consensus-builder, a good listener and an effective
communicator. He is a Texan, a Rhodes Scholar and graduate of Rice
University. He has been active in the communities in which he has lived
(Senior Warden of Christ Church Cathedral in Houston, Vestryman of St.
John's Lafayette Square in D.C.). He is a good family man--his wife of 29
years presently serves in the First Lady's Correspondence Office. As a
BakerBotts Senior Partner, Doty can afford to do this for the sake of the
job well done and is not attempting to "polish his resume" for another job.

         e. Most important, Doty has worked tirelessly for this President,
knows the President and his style, and is loyal to the President.  He wants
the President to succeed and will work hard to make sure the policies and
practices of the SEC reflect well on the President and his Administration.


Can we be even stronger on this?  The short answer is that Joe's resignation
has no impact on our view toward India.  The evaluation of our asset holdings
and new business opportunities is the same the day after Joe's resignation as
it was the day before.  If need be, we can reiterate previous statements
about our ongoing review of asset positions.  What do you think?

	John Ambler@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	10/24/2000 06:46 PM

		 To: Cliff Baxter@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig@ENRON, J
Mark Metts@Enron, Paula Rieker@ENRON
		 cc: Mark Palmer@ENRON, Karen Denne@ENRON, Cindy Derecskey@ECT
		 Subject: Sutton India Statement

We expect considerable Indian media interest and attempts to interpret the
implications of Joe Sutton's resignation.  In consultation with Mark Palmer
and others, we have developed the following statement, which we intend to use
only in response to media inquiries.  Please let me know if you have any
comments.

John

For Enron Use ) Only if Asked
October 24, 2000

Statement on Impact of Sutton Resignation on Enron in India

Joe Sutton,s departure should not significantly affect Enron,s commitment to
the Indian market.  In fact, consistent with Enron,s new business lines, we
are in the process of developing data centers and a fiber optic network in
India.  Of course, we continuously look to optimize the value of our business
interests and there may be some related adjustments in our holdings, but we
expect to continue as a significant participant in the Indian market.

If pressed:
We are not able to comment on specific plans or operations, as it is our
policy not to comment on the details of potential divestitures or
acquisitions.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/03/2000 11:43 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	09/03/2000 11:41 AM

		 To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: AEP

Joe--  How long can we hold off on this? I have left a message for Dan
Watkiss to call me about helping us with an anti-trust analysis. Maybe you
should also be on that call.


Kate, what is the latest regarding Sierra Pacific Industries and the buy
backs for the 29th & 30th in the amount of $103,968 for each day?  Let me
know if I can obtain more information for you.  The payment terms are net 5
days after receipt of invoice, which they faxed to me on April 30th.

Again, thanks for all your help regarding this and all the EES items.

Mark


Wow - that is one nasty looking storm out there - I wish I'd gotten in early
enough to get a covered parking spot.  Oh well, may sufficient hail storm
damage will get me a new car!

How would you like to deal with the Astros ticets?  I have a couple of
meetings scheduled but am pretty flexible today - maybe lunch time or when
you're ready to leave for the day?  Just let me know.  Call if you want -
713-853-7459.

Mark


Untitled Document
  	 [IMAGE]

 Volume Over 1.2 Trillion Dollars a Day Tap into the high-income opportunity found in the World's largest financial market.   The Foreign Currency Markets      Discover how: $20,000 "properly positioned" in the Euro vs. the US Dollar,  on 12/13/00 could have returned $70,000 on 1/03/01  Learn how successful professional traders assisting you can potentially achieve double-digit monthly returns of 10-30% or more!    For a Free Foreign Currency Trading Newsletter  and a comprehensive report on the foreign currency markets.  Click on the link below.    Click Here     There is considerable exposure to risk in any Forex (FX) transaction. Before deciding to participate in FX trading, you should carefully consider your objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. Most importantly don't invest money  you can't afford to lose.   If you are receiving this e-mail in error, we sincerely apologize. Simply send email to here  and put the word remove in the subject line. We Honor any and all Remove Requests. Any attempt to disable this Remove acct will only prevent others from being removed. Again, we apologize for any inconvenience and it wont happen again.


Until further notice, please set (and/or have your traders set) all of the curves to market representative numbers each day.  I hope that you have been doing so all along, but I heard today that this may not be happening on all desks.  Thanks for your help.  If you have any questions, please ask.
Regards,
Ed


fyi...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sandra Yamane <SYamane@marathon-com.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Sandra+20Yamane+20+3CSYamane+40marathon-com+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:29 PM
To:	Denne, Karen
Subject:	Long Beach Press-Telegram Online.htm

 <<Long Beach Press-Telegram Online.htm>>

 - Long Beach Press-Telegram Online.htm


I understand from Smith Day that APX forwarded us today a format of contract relating to their potentially serving as QSE for UBS AG trading.  APX is apparently willing to contract on a month-to-month basis (thus allowing us to move to our own IT interface with ERCOT as soon as possible).

As to item two below, until UBS would have the IT capability (currently under development and projected to be roughly a month from completion) to become certified to act as its own QSE, it would not need to execute any 'market participant' agreement with ERCOT in order to be a power marketer within ERCOT.  As soon as UBS desired to trade Renewable Energy Credits ("RECs"), it would need to sign a standard-form agreement with ERCOT in order to maintain a REC account.

Trading conducted by UBS with any given counterparty within ERCOT would be pursuant to 'UBSWarburgEnergyOnline' GTCs or else subject to discrete negotiated wholesale power enabling agreements and/or ISDA master agreements. The ERCOT ISO would have no connection with such relationship documents supporting UBS AG trading activities.  On the other hand, as UBS's likely counterparties are entities with wholesale power trading activities of national scope, the timeline for trading in ERCOT is linked to the timeline for completing wholesale power/financial master enabling agreements approved by UBS.  Doug Gilbert-Smith this afternoon identified the following counterparties in decreasing order of of their priority as trading partners in ERCOT:

TXU Energy Trading
BP Energy Company
Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
Aquila Power Corporation
Morgan Stanley capitral Group
Constellation Power Source
FPL Energy Power Marketing, Inc.
American Electic Power Service Corporation
Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, LP
Calpine Energy Servicces LP
Dynegy Marketing & Trade
LCRA --Lower Colorado River Authority

along with a couple of incumbent utilities:

San Antonio City Public Service
Reliant HL&P

If you desire Doug Gilbert -Smith to sit in on this meeting, then it would have to be scheduled for Thursday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:41 AM
To:	Gilbert-smith, Doug; Day, Smith L.; Sager, Elizabeth; Portz, David
Cc:	Will, Lloyd; Presto, Kevin M.; Bailey, Debra; Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs

UBS Legal and UBS Credit is heading to Houston this Thursday and Friday.  I have asked that ERCOT matters get 1 hour to discuss the necessary contracts that UBS will need to sign to participate in the ERCOT market.

Basically, my understanding is the following --

1.	PUCT Registration Form for Power Marketer
2.	ERCOT ISO Information
	QSE [Portz, David]   N/A until IT platform is ready for UBS to serve as its own QSE
	LSE [Portz, David]   N/A
	Wholesale Enabling Agreement [Portz, David]   No ERCOT  involvement
	Other [Portz, David]   REC Trading Account Agreement
3.	APX Agreement [Portz, David]   initially
4.	Other

Given the list of issues, this assumes that UBSW Energy will not be selling electricity at retail.  If we need this for Day 1, we would have to get an additional license from the PUCT.

Thanks,

Jim


Sheila, as per your phone message:

Also, fyi, I completed review of the CSFB Agreement last night and faxed
comments to their attorney.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/


Sean - is this anything we need to follow up on?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:26 PM -----

	Sherri Sera
	02/28/2001 01:58 PM

		 To: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Nicki Daw/NA/Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Nigeria Contract support

Mark and Steve, sorry to bother you with this, but I'm at a loss.  This guy
(Jim Cofield) called me on my cell phone last night about 7:00 p.m. to get my
e-mail address.  He asked that I take a look at his e-mail in the morning and
route it to the appropriate person within Enron.

The ".jpg" files below have no information in them, but the ".doc" file is a
14 page document with numerous correspondence from Mary Beth Cahill, former
director in the White House Office for Public Liaison, to Mr. Cofield
regarding a trip to Nigeria that he supposedly accompanied President Clinton
on several months ago; followed by a number of "proprietary information
documents" that mean absolutely nothing to me; followed by an overview of
Nigeria's electrical power situation; etc....The best I can tell, they are
trying to get Enron to bid on some project in Nigeria.

Since this e-mail is copied to the Vice President of the United States in
addition to several ambassadors, I thought it might need attention.  If you
can figure it out, please let me know how to proceed.  Thanks, SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
01:44 PM ---------------------------

"Jim Cofield" <jcofield@home.com> on 02/27/2001 07:06:11 PM
To: "Sherri Sera" <sherri.sera@enron.com>
cc: "Richard Cheney" <vice.president@whitehouse.gov>, "Ambassador Dele Cole"
<bedeos2000@yahoo.com>, "Ambassador Jibril Aminu" <bedeos2000@yahoo.com>,
"Ambassador Li Zhaoxing" <webmaster@china-embassy.org>

Subject: Nigeria Contract support

[IMAGE]

?

?

Jim E. Cofield

World Headquarters

Cofield Building

1016-22nd Street, Suite 200-500

Newport News, VA 23607-5316???????

Telephone? 757 223-0843

Fax: 757 223-0844

jcofield@home.com (email)

WebSite: http://cofield.my.treeway.com

"Making the World a Safer Place"

It is always an Honor to Serve and Support

?

?
 - image001.jpg
 - image002.jpg
 - image001.jpg
 - image002.jpg
 - Nigeria-Best8.doc


Greg:

Kevin Hannon and I were meeting yesterday to review various organizational
issues and one thing he asked me to do was extend a one time only offer to
take over the assets in Europe that don't really fit with their ongoing
business - i.e. Turkey, Poland and Sarlux.  An additional question I had is
whether you think that EWS continues to be the correct place for EEOS.

Your thoughts?

Jim Hughes


Mark,

We have customers who are now filling out the new form of the Australian PA.
As a result, we will need an Online Australian ETA very shortly.

Can you please approve/disapprove of the ETA form forwarded by David Minns?
(copy attached). Once we have your approval, we will put it on the system.

Thanks,

Dave


Michael - I understand we are paying the additional $440,220 that was sent
last Friday back this week.  Can you let me know what day this will need to
go out so we can have Treasury reserve the funds?  Thanks.


I send you the wrong date before.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT on 07/07/2000 06:49
PM ---------------------------

Kathy Reeves
07/07/2000 07:41 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: IM TXT FILES

Please note I also attached our excel file as I made a change from the one
that Brian saved out there.
Kathy


Attached is a Merrill Lynch report concerning Sempra and rate uncertainty in
Southern California.


Hi Chris,

I was hoping you'd be available via email today.  This is a test for now.

If this does get through to you, I want to purchase an additional 300 each for
the Nimo East pool and NIMO West pool.  I need the gas.

Thanks
Heidi
888-644-9784


uo


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 10:08 AM -----

	Steve Van Hooser
	02/22/2001 06:05 PM

		 To: suggsa@epenergy.com, RuoffJ@EPEnergy.com, dshoup@houston.rr.com,
SSidjones@aol.com, jvanhooser@foundrychurch.org, upiojs@infohwy.com,
kelley.bitner@chase.com, Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT, boyle@ridgefield.sdr.slb.com,
ajenright@aol.com, helms@gnubi.com, henry16414@aol.com, russell.horn@amd.com,
ghubert@foundrychurch.org, gary_lidiak@prusec..com, lmoses@llgm.com,
jnorton@lgc.com, Mary Ogden, leslee@smrlaw.net, rrich@bracepatt.com, Kerry
Roper/Enron@EnronXGate, dickrundle@classic.msn.com, RuoffJ@EPEnergy.com,
ricegrad81@aol.com, Ron Tapscott, cthompson@bracepatt.com, Andy
Unverzagt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Randy Maffett, Gerald
Nemec, Pat Radford, W Tom Byargeon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Bieniawski, Scott
Monson, Dan Staines, Ken Loch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Peyton, Michael C Bilberry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jack
Simunek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel, Michael Brown/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: wwilcox@pdq.net, svanhooser@houston.rr.com
		 Subject: FW: Bush Tax Cut

I usually don't forward e:mail messages en masse.  I made an exception in
this case because I found the issue compelling. I also found completing and
submitting my responses to the attached survey to be quick and straight
forward.

I hope you will take a few moments to consider the attached tax survey and
respond according to your convictions.

Thanks,

Steve Van Hooser
----- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001 05:38 PM -----

	"Wayne Wilcox" <wwilcox@pdq.net>
	02/22/2001 06:29 PM
	Please respond to wwilcox

		 To: "Wayne Wilcox" <frosty6557@aol.com>, "Bryan Slaven"
<bslaven@carrollprint.com>, "Dan Hazen" <Hazen.Dan@EPEnergy.com>, "Dave
Michalek" <davem@reefindustries.com>, "Dave Nattras" <nattras@pdq.net>,
"David Gurghigian" <gurghigian@clamericas.com>, "David Othold"
<twotrak@ev1.net>, "Forrest Wilcox" <mimi611930@aol.com>, "Jeff Moore"
<jmoore@moorefrey.com>, "Jeff Ottmann" <jdottmann@aol.com>, "Jim Giese"
<jgiese8888@aol.com>, "Joe Schwartzott" <Schwartzottj@email.msn.com>, "Mark
Taylor" <mtaylor@triten.com>, "Mark Winegar" <mwinegar@houwire.com>, "Roger
O'Farrell" <rofarrell1@hotmail.com>, "Robert Henderson" <hende46@ibm.net>,
"Tony Kelly" <tonkelly@cisco.com>, "Al Diener" <adiener100@aol.com>, "Gary
Stefaniak" <gstefaniak@houston.geoquest.slb.com>, "Jerry Jungels"
<jerry.jungels.bzgz@statefarm.com>, "John Davidson" <contijohnd@aol.com>,
"Lee Mc Fadden" <lmcfadden@houston.rr.com>, "Mark Neagli" <mneagli@aol.com>,
"Randy Osburn" <RandyO@calltsc.com>, "Randy Thompson" <rtsun@compuserve.com>,
"Steve Van Hooser" <steve.van.hooser@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Bush Tax Cut

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Eberle [mailto:info@MillionsofAmericans.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:35 PM
To: wwilcox@pdq.net
Subject: Bush Tax Cut

** 2nd Alert from MillionsofAmericans.com**

President George W. Bush needs your help to build more
support for his tax cut proposal.

In the last week or so two Republican Senators (Lincoln
Chafee of Rhode Island and James Jeffords of Vermont) have
withdrawn support for the Bush plan.

Two more GOP moderates (Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and
Olympia Snowe of Maine) are threatening to oppose the bill
if major details of the tax cut are not changed.

Remember, the U.S. Senate is split 50-50.  That means every
Republican vote we lose and every Democrat vote we gain is
absolutely critical.

Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) has been
called upon to help make sure the President's plan gets
through Congress.

One way they're going to help President Bush is by
convincing Senators who are on the fence that a majority of
American taxpayers -- like you and me -- want them to stand
firm on the key points.

To accomplish this goal, ATR put together a quick taxpayer
survey on their web site.  The results of this survey will
be presented to every U.S. Senator and House Speaker Dennis
Hastert.

Here is a link: http://www.atr.org/A426.htm

Here is a list of their questions:

#1 Do you support tax cuts for all Americans?

The Democrats in Congress want targeted tax cuts for people
who meet certain income and behavioral categories.
President George W. Bush has proposed cutting everybody's
taxes.

#2 Should we kill the Estate Tax (also called Death Tax)?

You pay taxes all of your life. Should your loved ones be
forced to sell off your family business, family farm or
heirlooms to pay up to 55% in taxes when you pass away?

#3 Should we abolish the marriage penalty?

Right now, our government is punishing couples for
getting married by bumping them into higher combined tax
brackets.

#4 Do you favor making the tax cuts retroactive to Jan 1st
2001?

President Bush's proposed tax plan provides relief to our
families and stimulates our economy right now by making tax
cuts retroactive to the beginning of this year.  That way
you'd see your tax cut in this year's paychecks.

Each of these questions are up for debate over the next few
weeks and months while Congress decides the exact size and
scope of the tax cut.

I strongly encourage all taxpayers to stand up and be
counted by visiting the ATR web site and answering these
questions.

In addition to providing the survey results, Grover wants to
be able to show our leaders in Congress that hundreds of
thousands of Americans participated in this survey --
so please take a minute to respond and SPREAD THE WORD!!!

Here is the link again: http://www.atr.org/A426.htm

Check it out.

For Integrity,
Bruce Eberle
MillionsofAmericans.com

PS: Full details of President Bush's tax cut plan are available at the ATR
site.

-------------------------------------------------------------
If you would like to unsubscribe from Millions of Americans
e-mail updates, please visit our web site at:

http://www.millionsofamericans.com/home/unsubscribe.cfm?email=wwilcox@pdq.ne
t

AOL Users:
Unsubscribe or Change E-mail
-------------------------------------------------------------


Does anyone have the file for Barrett Resources Corporation?

Stephanie


This is a copy of your message sent to Poblet@talkmatch.com -->

Thanks for the email.  It was my first one!  I just got everything set up on this service and now I'm curious.  I liked what I read in your profile, but I'm wondering why you didn't include a picture?  I think you have me at a disadvantage.  I'll keep this short incase I'm doing something wrong and this email comes back to me.  Drop me a line and we'll chat.

Paul

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.


The meeting will be held in EB5001 for those attending the meeting in person.

Kelly M. Johnson
Executive Assistant
Enron Corp.
Tel: 713-853-6485
Fax: 713-853-2534
E-Mail: kelly.johnson@enron.com


Don:

This sounds like to same offering that we previously received about two weeks ago from Michael Kolman (not our Michael Coleman) of Navigant. Was the offering you received from Navigant as well?

FYI, Navigant (again, Michael Kolman) is representing us on the sale of our SW501D5A, and we have frequent updates with him on our turbine as well as other turbines and sites being offered in the market.

Regards,

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From:	Miller, Don (Asset Mktg)
Sent:	Sat 10/13/2001 11:32 AM
To:	Jacoby, Ben; Whitaker, Rick; Marks, David; Presto, Kevin M.; Davis, Mark Dana; Calger, Christopher F.; Tricoli, Carl
Cc:	Duran, W. David; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	Development/Turbine  Opportunity

I have just received a letter which outlines the following sites and turbines which are for sale in the market.  Please let me know if any of you have any interest and we will sign the CA and get more detailed information.  I have additional details at my desk but will limit this email to a brief summary.

SITES
Site A: PJM  - Central (PA) 1100 MW gas/oil fired CC using Siemens V84.2 or GE 7FA.  Brownfield site located on Susquehanna River in PA.
Site B: PJM - East (NJ) 550 MW gas/oil fired CC using GE 7FA. Brownfield site along Delaware River in NJ.
Site C: PJM - West (PA) 1100 MW gas/oil fired CC using Siemens V84.2 or GE 7FA. Greenfield in western PA.
Site D: PJM - West (PA) 1100 MW gas/oil fired CC using GE 7FA.  Brownfield in western PA. Site is located on existing gas storage field.

Some of the sites have access to multiple gas and oil pipelines.  All four sites have queue positions in the PJM process and have received completed PJM Feasibility Studies.  Two of the sites have completed Impact Studies.

TURBINES
6 Siemens V84.2 gas turbine generators with deliveries from Aug 2002-April 2003.
2 Alstom Steam Turbines for V84.2 applications with delivery May 2003 and Oct. 2003.

6 GE 7FA Turbines for duel fuel operation with dry low-NOx combustors.  Delivery is as follows: 2 - Nov. 2002,  2 - March 2003, 2 - Nov. 2003.
3 Alstom Steam Turbines for 7 FA Application with delivery May, July and Oct 2003.

Let me know if anyone has any interest.

Thanks,

Don


John Lavorato already said that he would make JD report directly to Canada.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Milnthorp, Rob
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 8:45 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	Disturnal

John, one thing to consider with your nat gas org is the reporting of disturnal to john arnold. From my standpoint, this was an unfortunate move and is similar to us losing the east gas desk to Houston. You will want to give this careful consideration, particularly if you are looking to disturnal to trade alberta power options. With the change in leadership we should discuss whether we want to grab disturnal back (solid line reporting) and suggest dotted line to arnold.

fyi - his P&L for accounting purposes continues to roll-up to canada. However, for internal mgmt reporting, his p&l rolls up to arnold.


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2000 11:51
AM ---------------------------

"Vanessa Wilson" <VWILSON@skadden.com> on 03/30/2000 11:16:35 AM
To: allan.janna@enron.com, joana.ryan@enron.com
cc: rgay@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, MTHURBER@mail5.allegro.net
Subject: Fwd: GE Letter Agreement

As requested, attached please find the e-mail I sent to Rob Gay to which the
current draft of the Letter Agreement with GEII is attached and which briefly
summarizes the indemnity issue we have been discussing.

If you have any questions or would like to discuss the attached further,
please feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.

------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:36:15 -0500
From: "Vanessa Wilson" <VWILSON@skadden.com>
Cc: MTHURBER@skadden.com
Subject: GE Letter Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_4E179871.E8897E40"

Rob,

Attached please find the current draft of the Letter Agreement (32581.7),
including Attachment 8 (32573.7) which sets forth various provisions to be
included in the Purchase Agreement.  Article 20 regarding indemnification is
included in Attachment 8.

As we discussed, West LB has some concerns regarding including language in
Article 20 which GEII requested by which West LB would indemnify GEII for
Enron's acts (in its capacity as Agent).  West LB has suggested they would be
willing to undertake this obligation if they are reimbursed by Enron through
the Acquisition and Development Agreement.  Today, for the first time, West
LB indicated that they may require a cap on this liability for Agent's acts
in the Purchase Agreement.

GEII has requested that West LB undertake this obligation and Enron has
agreed to pursue it with West LB.  In light of this, the language which would
establish West LB's indemnity obligation for the Agent's acts is not included
in the current draft of Attachment 8.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.  As I mentioned, we are
trying to finalize the Letter Agreement with GEII very shortly.  I apologize
for any confusion and look forward to working with you on this matter.  If
you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please
feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.

Thanks,
Vanessa.

 - 32581_7.doc
 - 32573_7.doc
 - 32614_2.xls


Hey Bob -

Her name is Kartini Muljadi.  I haven't done a good job of staying in touch
but the last numbers I have for her are:

Phone: 62-21-525-6968
Fax: 62-21-525-5561

If those don't work, you might check with Yao who has stayed in touch with
one of the other lawyers in that firm.  He has moved over to Enron
International where he is responsible for their African legal affairs.  I
know he is out of town (in Africa) right now and unfortunately I'm not sure
if his e-mail address has changed.  His phone number is the same - maybe his
secretary could put you in touch with him.

Good luck!

Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Steve Hackman <shackman@isye.gatech.edu>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	hi

Vince,

Just wanted to let you know how much I enjoyed your talk (and dinner
conversation!).  In fact, the buzz after your presentation was to the
effect that you gave one of the best industry/academic talks.

Please know that you have an open invitation to visit us.  You have my
email address and my office phone number is 404-894-2327.    I look forward
to hooking up with you again in the future.

Steve

p.s. If at all possible I would appreciate receiving any information
(reprints, etc.) that you feel would help us learn about the
industry.  Also, you mentioned a book that you said would be the best
introduction, but I forgot the name.  Thanks again.


Hey, I understand the trading rotation program is underway.  I'd like an
update next week so we can participate as well.

Happy Thanksgiving, or the Canadian equivalent.

Jeff


i didn't know shirley's father died.


Our counsel has provided these drafts of the project documents.  Please
review.  We also anticipate sending out the turbine contracts later today.

Please be advised of our timeline.  Since we need to fund escrow by Wednesday
21 March, it is imperative that we are able to sign these documents on Friday
16 March.  It is our assumption there will be some lag between the obligation
to fund escrow and the actual transfer of funds.

Your comments to these documents are expected by Friday 9 March.

I also want to mention that Enron initiated the additional purchase of Power
System Stabilizers, which cost $31,675 per turbine.  PSS are required in the
WSCC.  If you desire this optional equipment, please reflect that cost in
your final bid.

Steve Thome

503-539-2340
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001 10:38
AM ---------------------------


Susan and I are on the case.  Are you still in DC?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:05 AM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	RE: Dynegy v. ComEd update

yes, excellent.  thanks - i will review.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nicolay, Christi L.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:58 AM
To:	Lindberg, Susan; Herndon, Rogers; Misra, Narsimha; Sharfman, Guy; Sager, Elizabeth; Murphy, Harlan; Steffes, James D.; Migden, Janine; Forster, David; Baughman Jr., Don; Stroup, Kerry; Roan, Michael; Kingerski, Harry; Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Fulton, Donna; Presto, Kevin M.; Sturm, Fletcher J.
Subject:	Dynegy v. ComEd update

Susan and I will circulate a draft response against Dynegy's position later today.  ComEd plans to file a lengthy answer disputing Dynegy stating that there are no transmission problems due to the use of the firm LD resources and that FERC precedent does not support a capacity payment requirement.

Enron will respond similarly and include an argument that Dynegy is actually trying to create an "icap/capacity" requirement where there is none (Dynegy's pleading states "ComEd's failure to enforce the network designation provisions of its OATT also deprives Dynegy of capacity payments to which it is entitled.)  We will also include statements that the continuation of the network v. PTP transmission tariffs perpetuates these types of issues and the market/tariff design that we advocate should be approved to stop these problems.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Susan
Sent:	Saturday, October 20, 2001 5:20 PM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Herndon, Rogers; Misra, Narsimha; Sharfman, Guy; Sager, Elizabeth; Murphy, Harlan; Steffes, James D.; Migden, Janine; Forster, David; Baughman Jr., Don; Stroup, Kerry; Roan, Michael; Kingerski, Harry
Subject:	Dynegy vs. ComEd (EL02-6) -- further info

As I mentioned in my previous e-mail, on October 17 Dynegy filed a complaint against ComEd.  This proceeding may be of particular interest to Enron given EES's plans to offer physical delivery in Illinois in early 2002.  I've outlined Dynegy's principal arguments below.  Dynegy requested fast-track processing, so any intervention and comments we file are due Friday, Oct. 26.  In order to file a timely intervention (and meaningful comments, if we decide to comment), I need to know your thoughts on this as soon as possible.  Elizabeth and Harlan, I'm copying you because I would especially like to know what you think of Dynegy's characterization of the Firm LD product.

Main argument:
Dynegy challenges ComEd's published Business Practice that allows "marketer firm" (Firm LD) contracts to be designated as Network Resources.  Dynegy argues that this practice conflicts with the OATT provisions that 1) Network Resources are generation "owned, purchased or leased by the Network Customer designated to serve Network Load," and 2) a Network Customer "must demonstrate that it owns or has committed to purchase generation pursuant to an executed contract" in order to designate a Network Resource.

Dynegy's theory on why Firm LD should not be a Network Resource:

	- permits designation of network resources that are committed for sale to others, creating reliability problems
	- Firm LD under the EEI contract is not capacity-backed, nor is it a commitment to purchase generation
	- allows transmission customers to get the advantage of generation capacity without actually paying the cost of that capacity
	- since retail providers are allowed to rely on "over-the-counter" firm instead of securing long-term contracts, adequate reserves are not being carried to serve retail load

Dynegy claims that ComEd's practice has deprived DMG of payments for capacity and the ability to earn revenues for capacity properly designated as network resources.  It cites specific instances in which ComEd has accepted transmission reservation requests from New Energy and Cilco in which these parties designated Illinois Power as a network resource, when only a Firm LD contracts were in place with IP.

Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596


---------------------- Forwarded by Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000
03:38 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dan J Bump @ ENRON                           02/22/2000 02:26 PM

To: Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Allocation Letter

Shonnie--

See attached for your review.

Should we even send a letter?

Thx

Dan


Alyse,

2 more names.

Please, let Kristin know we can take all these Wharton students.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001
11:07 AM ---------------------------

FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu> on 02/05/2001 10:58:50 AM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc: "'chenvinc@wharton.upenn.edu'" <chenvinc@wharton.upenn.edu>, FAP
<FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: Reliant Tigers interested in Enron

Vince:

Below, please find 2 names of Wharton students who are interested in
internships this summer.

Thanks,
Donna

-----Original Message-----
From: Chen, Vincent [mailto:chenvinc@wharton.upenn.edu]
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 11:24 PM
To: 'FAP'
Subject: RE: Call from Enron

Donna, I had also passed along the resumes of two Reliant Energy Tiger Team
members, David Gershenson and James Iker, who were both interested in
working for Enron this summer. I had spoken to Vince about these candidates
when we were in Houston, and he said he would arrange internships for them
as well.
He should already have copies of their resumes and cover letters. Please let
me know if you have any questions or need clarification.

Thanks!!
Vincent

 --------End of Unsent Message


Did we (GA) recommend the extension?  If so, nice recommendation.  Given the
circumstances, it's a win-win, and still leaves us with the swaption to
exercise at a later date.  Hope all is well. When I call, you're always in a
meeting.  I will be on the leadership call tomorrow.  Hope you're well.

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	03/28/2001 04:18 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Delay in circulating DWR Dash

FYI.
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001 04:17 PM -----

	Tracy Ngo@ECT
	03/28/2001 03:39 PM

		 To: Vladimir Gorny/Enron@EnronXGate, Frank Hayden/Enron@EnronXGate,
Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Delay in circulating DWR Dash

Given the status of Phase I of DWR possibly being extended to the end of
April, we will not be circulating a DASH at this time for the five-year DWR
swaption.  Will advise at a later date of any developments.

Thanks all for your help for now.

Regards,
Tracy


I have received several calls this morning regarding the above, so apparently
there is some doubt.  Please be advised that the executive committee will not
meet today.  Further, due to travel schedules and the holidays, executive
committee meetings will not be held on Monday, December 18 or Monday,
December 25.

Please make note that the next executive committee meeting will be held on
Tuesday, January 2, 2001at 11:00 a.m. in EB50 Boardroom.

Don't hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Regards and Happy Holidays!
Sherri
x3-5984


Here's what I've come up with so far on these deals. There are just two more
that are going to require a little bit more attention - 566426 and 566391 -
the SP-15 deals for 4/2. I'm sorry it's taken me a few days to get back to
you on this. Please let me know what you think, and we'll go from there.

Thanks,
Kate
Trading Support
503-464-7486


Stacey,

I was in the MSN DSL pilot.  As you know MSN is no longer providing DSL
through Northpoint.  You told me that Enron would not subsidize SWB DSL
service which is what MSN suggested I sign up for.  What did Enron decide to
do about DSL?  I could not tell from the ClickAtHome intranet.

Stacy


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Acton/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2000 04:15
PM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor@ECT
04/05/2000 03:42 PM
To: Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:

Tom,

Please see the attached file calculating the final wellhead production
estimate for the month of April.  This file has been updated with actual noms
sent in via the producer.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353


Thanks Pat, good to know that they know EES crashes often!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanse, Patrick
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 12:55 PM
To:	Mansfield, Marci; Grace, Rebecca M.
Cc:	Thomas, Paul D.; Bentley, Corry
Subject:	FW: PJM duplicate oasis requests to be annulled

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PJM OASIS REQUESTS BELOW HAVE BEEN ANNULLED PER OUR REQUEST.  These duplicate requests accounted for over 34,000 mw hrs .  Please let me know if there are any problems checking out w/ pjm on the requests below.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	walton3@pjm.com@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Hanse, Patrick
Cc:	weathers@www1.pjm.com; mccomb@www1.pjm.com; baizma@www1.pjm.com; DESSENHE@www1.pjm.com
Subject:	FW: PJM duplicate oasis requests to be annulled

Per your request and further analysis by PJM OASIS and Market Settlements the
following OASIS numbers have been annulled.

99408
99637
99683
99754
99749
100089
100077

As indicated in the e-mail below, these are the numbers that you did not link.
If you have any further questions please contact either Aaron Baizman or myself
at 610-666-8972.

Frank Walton 3rd
Real Time Operations Support Analyst
System Operations
(610) 666-8849

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	McComb, John
> Sent:	Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:43 AM
> To:	Walton, Frank C. III; Weathers, Brian
> Cc:	Baizman, Aaron; Dessender, H.E.
> Subject:	RE: PJM duplicate oasis requests to be annulled
>
> It would appear that the request is backwards
> They are using all the ones they say are duplicates, and not using the
> originals
> anyway consider this the OFFICIAL List of which ones you should annul,  and
> We'll do the same on the MSET side
>
> 7/01/2001  annul 99408
> 7/05/2001  annul 99637
> 7/06/2001  annul 99683
> 7/08/2001  annul 99754 & 99749
> 7/13/2001  annul 100089
> 7/13/2001  annul 100077
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Walton, Frank C. III
> Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 6:07 PM
> To:	Weathers, Brian; McComb, John
> Cc:	Baizman, Aaron
> Subject:	FW: PJM duplicate oasis requests to be annulled
>
> I have confirmed that this is the case.  If you could check on these and see
> what your side reveals than I can make a final decision as to whether or not
> to annul these.
>
> Frank Walton 3rd
> Real Time Operations Support Analyst
> System Operations
> (610) 666-8849
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Hanse, Patrick [SMTP:Patrick.Hanse@enron.com]
> Sent:	Monday, July 30, 2001 3:33 PM
> To:	walton3@pjm.com
> Cc:	Grace, Rebecca M.; Bentley, Corry; Thomas, Paul D.
> Subject:	PJM duplicate oasis requests to be annulled
>
> Frank
> Per your request to our phone conversation, please find below  the list
> of duplicate oasis requests that we are asking PJM to refund or annul
> because of system problems experienced by Enron on the PJM transmission
> site.
>
> 7/01/2001  Request that trans id 99409 be annulled (duplicate of 99408)
> 7/05/2001  Request that trans id 99639 be annulled (duplicate of 99637)
> 7/06/2001  Request that trans id 99688 be annulled (duplicate of 99683)
> 7/08/2001  Request that trans id 99754 & 99757 be annulled (duplicate of
> 99749)
> 7/13/2001  Request that trans id 100090 be annulled (duplicate of
> 100089)
> 7/13/2001  Request that trans id 100078 be annulled (duplicate of
> 100077)
>
> please call me if you have any questions or need anything else from
> Enron in order to get the corrections made to the above transmission
> request.  Thanks you for your attention to this matter.  Please respond
> back to me when the changes have been made and Enron's back office can
> check out mw's and $'s for the month of July.
>
> Patrick Hanse
> Enron Power Trading
> 713-853-3806
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
> may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others
> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized
> to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron
> Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
> message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an
> offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
> enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the
> intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as
> the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


SALES AGT: SH/ZCKQVQ

                                          MOISAN/ANNE

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002

  DATE:  NOV 20 2000

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  26DEC HOUSTON TX     NEW YORK NY    747A    1213P
CO 1964    Q          TUE   G.BUSH INTERCO LA GUARDIA
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL M
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:26 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  01JAN NEW YORK NY    HOUSTON TX     259P    559P
CO 1975    Q          MON   LA GUARDIA     G.BUSH INTERCO
                            TERMINAL M     TERMINAL C
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         4:00 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-300

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/ID6T95

CO  FREQUENT FLYER CODG721774
**CONTINENTAL RECORD LOCATOR: ID6T95
THIS IS A TICKETLESS RESERVATION. PLEASE HAVE A
PICTURE ID AVAILABLE AT THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU
***********************************************
NON-REFUNDABLE TICKET MINIMUM $75.00 CHANGE FEE
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!
http://calendar.yahoo.com/


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001 04:07 PM -----

	Mary Cook
	01/30/2001 09:19 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Angela
Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: On System ISDA and CSA

Attached are the Multicurrency ISDA and applicable CSA forms in Word.  These
documents are for your internal use in study, negotiating and the like.  I
find it useful to be able to use search and find for concepts etc. in
negotiating and understanding the guide and definitions.  These documents are
not to be used externally, ie emailed as the "form," since we have a general
rule that we always utilize printed versions of the form with our internal
clients and external customers.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Energy Exchange Program Neutrality Adjustment
		Charge Type 1487
		SC Settlement Contacts:

		Background
		As you may know, the Energy Exchange Program began on trade
date 11/14/2000.  In this program the ISO obtained needed energy in the real
time market and, rather than paying for the energy as a purchase, later
returned the energy in another period.  This was not necessarily a
one-for-one exchange.  The incoming energy created a positive neutrality
adjustment and when the energy was returned, a negative neutrality
adjustment ensued.  Since the incoming and outgoing energy were usually
valued differently, there was a cost shift associated with the transaction
that was not cash neutral to the ISO. The ISO created Charge Type 1487 for
the allocation of the cost to SCs participating in the market during the
incoming schedules

		Notification
		The ISO has created Charge Type 1487 so that whenever an
Energy Exchange account is closed or reaches a zero balance, the incurred
costs will be calculated and allocated to the SC's based on their total
negative Uninstructed Energy over those intervals in which the incoming
schedules took place.  This new Charge Type will appear beginning on the
June 30, 2001 statements which will be published on August 23, 2001.  In
addition a few accounts reached a zero balance as early as December, 2000
and therefore allocations may or may not appear on your statement with the
rerun data.

		CT 1487 is a semi automated charge, meaning that the
collection of energy data is automated, but it will be a manual charge type
within the Manual Line Item Records and will not require a change to your
settlement system.  Note that this charge will not appear on every
statement, but only when an Energy Exchange account is closed or reaches a
zero balance.

		If you have any questions, please contact your Client
Relations Account Manager.

				Client Relations Communication
				      CRCommunications@caiso.com


Hey Shorty,

This work thing is getting out of hand.  Today has just flown adios and we
are not very close to leaving.  I hope your day is going well.  I haven't
even had enough time to find some good wholesome jokes for you but I will.
I'll talk to you later.

Ted


Can you join me at this meeting?  I plan to talk with Tom Gros tomorrow to
let him know that you will be the liasion with CommodityLogic for Energy
Operations.  Then I thought that we could both attend this next meeting as a
transition.  Then it's on your calendar after that !  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000 05:29 PM
---------------------------

08/14/2000 03:13 PM
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
08/14/2000 03:13 PM
08/14/2000 03:13 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simon
Sear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Norden/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Schomer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, John P
Tollefsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Ballengee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrew
Cole/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brad Romine/NA/Enron@Enron, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Xochil Moreno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Yolanda Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Graves/Corp/Enron@Enron, Terry Furches/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: CommodityLogic Team Mtg. 8/16

REMINDER :

Our weekly CommodityLogic Team meeting will be held in EB 21C2 on Wednesday,
August 16th. from 10am - 11am. If you have any questions or will be UNABLE to
attend, please feel free to send me an e-mail or call me.

Thanks,
Brenda
x31914