i guess he'll be a better reliever, if the pressure doesn't make him go
mental.  as for dierker, my guess is they might can him if the astros don't
get their act together by the all-star break.  who knows?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:56 AM
To: Reuter, Marisa
Subject: RE: ENA/NorthWestern: Certificate of Amendment & Closing
Checklis t

I just like to make Margie work.

So do you think they'll fire Dierker?  I guess you heard Lima is heading to
the bullpen.

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 05/31/2001 11:42:13 AM

To:   "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: ENA/NorthWestern: Certificate of Amendment & Closing Checklis
t

Will do.  For the moment, the only document that is outstanding is the
joint
letter instruction to Citibank regarding the disbursement of the escrow
funds.  I have a template, but I'll go ahead and let them take the lead.

MIR

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:32 AM
To: Reuter, Marisa
Subject: Re: ENA/NorthWestern: Certificate of Amendment & Closing
Checklist

If there are any other resolutions, etc that they want, I would let them
prepare them.

Thanks a bunch,

Kay

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Ted,

I tried to send this page a little while ago and I think it failed.  So, you
may have to actually drop this address into the netscape location section to
bring up the site.

Anyway, there seemed to be a pretty good selection on the web.  Still, I
think the one on this page best captures the kind of image you're looking to
project.

http://www.bucklesofestes.com/images/image123a.jpg

If you'd rather shop around try these (there are some outstanding designs)...

http://www.bucklesofestes.com/

http://www.lazyassranch.com/

Disclaimer:   Please realize these sites were sent in jest.  If you actually
don any of the items contained within them I may be forced to sever all ties
               and deny ever having known you.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 04:16 PM -----

	Scott Tackett@ENRON
	08/21/2000 04:07 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Weather Derivative Templates

I guess it was more like 25 minutes instead of 5 minutes, but here you go ...


I would think what you are charging should include benefits and payroll taxes as they are part of employee expenses.  I don't think there is a way in SAP to stop that from happening unless it is a manual entry.

Greg Mathews@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/07/2001 11:05 AM
To:	Elaine Concklin/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Vera Apodaca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry D Martin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Mark Up Rate

Elaine:

As discussed earlier,  the cost center accounts will have to be programmed such that only the Labor Cost move from the Cost Center out to the project.  It is my understanding that Labor Costs at ETS is defined as Base Salary plus Benefits/Burden/Taxes, and therefore, these costs follow with the base labor.

When we define a markup rate in the general E&C business,  the markup is always on the base labor only.  I am asking that you also freeze the transfer of Benefits/taxes/Burdens so that our markup rate will be correct.

Thanks,
Greg


---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/27/99
08:10 AM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/27/99 07:27 AM

To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Paul
Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Revised CNG deliveries - Hope #'s Jan 00

Here are the final numbers to my retail deliveries.

 - Book2.xls


see below.  I'm sure your guys are considering all of the applications in due
course and those who are waiting are naturally going to be anxious to hear.
Not asking for any special treatment for this individual, but, as we
discussed in your office the other day, there are some continuing core skills
in the EE&CC group that we need to hold onto.  At first glance, this guy
seems to have those skills.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 08:06 AM -----

	Adel Rizkalla@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/30/2000 03:44 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean@EES, Cindy Olson@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Appeal for your support to continue to serve Enron

From:  Adel A. Rizkalla, Ph.D.      November 30, 2000
  12118 Knobcrest Dr.
  Houston, Texas 77070

e-mail: Adel.Rizkalla@enron.com

Extension: 55841

Attention: MR.  STEVE  KEAN
  MS.  CINDY  OLSON

Dear Mr. Kean and Ms. Olson:

I am privileged and delighted for providing me with this opportunity of
writing directly to both of you, while I am on re-deployment status.

The purpose of this letter is to respectfully appeal to both of you to please
help me continue serving Enron and continue being an active manager within
this most challenging environment, as I feel I am most qualified.

I joined Enron EE&CC on March 1, 2000; now am an EES employee. I am a
Mechanical Engineer, with 32 years work experience and extraordinary track
record in the oil & gas and power generation EPC business worldwide, with
major global organizations.

I hold a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (specifically in the Gas Turbines
Technology). I have been a Project Manager, Senior Project Manager, and
Project Director on major multi-million Dollar onshore and offshore
development projects since 1980, in every hydrocarbons  producing region.

I was interviewed at Enron,s EE&CC in mid February 2000 pursuant to my
application for Project Manager/Senior Project Manager position.

I was then hired on March 1, 2000 as Project Engineering Manager (PEM), under
quite urgent circumstances, to be in charge of all three (3) major and most
active Power Projects at EE&CC in Brazil.  Just one (1) week later, after my
new hires orientation, I had to join a delegation and travel to Brazil for
Due Diligence of Local Engineering and Construction Contractors.

The Expected NTP was January 2001, and the life of these foreign Projects
(except for Electrobolt ) simple cycle plant) is three (3) to four (4) years,
i.e. until the year 2003 and 2004.  These Projects are RioGen, Cuiaba II, and
Electrobolt.

I was attracted to Enron due to its standing and recognition in the industry,
reputation, globalization, and active market penetration.  In fact, I felt
very fortunate to become the center of the above-mentioned challenges with
three such major Enron Power Projects.

I resigned my then current and very secure position as Senior Project Manager
at Solar Turbines Incorporated (a Caterpillar company), after almost 6
successful years, where I was entrusted with Solar,s major turnkey power and
gas compression projects, worldwide.

My prime objective and priority then, when I accepted to work for Enron were,
clearly, to tackle and continue with the new challenges that Enron offered me
until the year 2003 ) 2004.

However, I am still very optimistic and hopeful that, with your kind support,
I am hoping to receive due consideration of this appeal.

I have already interviewed with Messrs. Steve Meyers and Dave Roberts at EES,
and both believe that they are certainly in need of a strong technical person
like myself, but no confirmation has been received yet.

I have also applied to at least fifteen (15) pertinent positions within EES,
ENA, and Enron Transportation but, unfortunately, have received no response
yet.

Nevertheless, I am most certain that you do not want to loose a knowledgeable
and active member of your team, and I am most confident that you can assist
placing me in a position where I can contribute most positively to Enron,s
continued success and profitability.

Sincerely,

Adel

Attachments:


We should definitely take the pay-out.

Jarek

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Glowacki, Jacek
Sent:	22 October 2001 14:20
To:	Jarek Astramowicz/WAR/ECT@ENRON; Overfield, Adam; Edgley, Anne; Cattigan, Ed; Dybowski, Jarek; Derrick Jr., James; Shaw, Eric
Subject:	RE: Car

The car was bought on Jan. 18, 2001for 152 500 PLN.
The car was stolen on May 2001 and PZU compensation paid  on Oct. 2001 will be 131 500 PLN
The market value on Oct 2001 is 95 000PLN

jacek
---------------------- Forwarded by Jacek Glowacki/EU/Enron on 22/10/2001 15:15 ---------------------------
From:	Jarek Astramowicz/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 19/10/2001 15:18 GDT
To:	Renata Maziarz/EU/Enron@ENRON, Adam Overfield/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Anne Edgley/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Ed Cattigan/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Jaroslaw Dybowski/Enron@EUEnronXGate, James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Shaw/ENRON@EUEnronXGate
cc:	Jacek Glowacki/EU/Enron@ENRON, George Lojko/EU/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	RE: Car

what is the amount of the compensation PZU is to pay ENS vs the market value vs the insured amount ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maziarz, Renata
Sent:	19 October 2001 14:05
To:	Overfield, Adam; Edgley, Anne; Cattigan, Ed; Astramowicz, Jarek; Dybowski, Jarek; Derrick Jr., James; Shaw, Eric
Cc:	Glowacki, Jacek; Lojko, George
Subject:	Car

Dear All,

With reference to Art 14.2 (11) of the Articles of Association the Management Board wishes to ask the Supervisory Board for written consent to assign the rights of ownership of motor vehicle Alfa Romeo (reg - RLE 400) to the insurers PZU to enable them to pay compensation to ENS for the theft of the vehicle. Should the vehicle now be found, the property rights to the vehicle will reside with PZU.

Management Board
Elektrocieplownia Nowa Sarzyna


This in an automated e-mail sent out from the Commissioner.COM
web site.  Do not reply to this e-mail, but instead please visit
your league's site at http://football.commissioner.com/enron2000

-------------------------------------------------------------

Gary Taylor requests the following transaction:.

  Drop Larry Centers.
  Add Chris Howard.

-------------------------------------------------------------

To approve this transaction, please go to your web site and
select Transactions, Requests in the Front Office.


Vasant,

Thanks. FYI. Our internal RAC models assign roughly BB credit rating to Enron.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shanbhogue, Vasant
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 8:05 AM
To:	Boots, Kelly H.
Cc:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	KMV

Hi Kelly,

here is an updated version of the KMV writeup with some general positives as well.  I eliminated the last section on Enron, and changed some wording.  I did not think you wanted to explictly give Enron's EDF on the website.  Let me know if you want to add it back, and if you have any other suggestions.  I will continue to review how else we can change/extend the writeup.

Thanks,
Vasant

 << File: KMV Description0809.doc >>


My employee in question fell out in "Needs Improvement" because of the lack
of time in her position.

DG    3-9573

Francisco deJesus@ENRON
12/21/2000 04:35 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Communications and Development Plan

You have 1 employee who fell out in  "Needs Improvement" at the year end 2000
PRC process.

I would like to meet with you to address the employee's areas of
improvement.  Additionally, I will be sitting in on your discussion with the
employee. My role will be twofold:

assist you in creating a communication and development plan for the employee
to serve as an advocate for the employee and management

As agreed, We will not be sitting in with employees who were placed in "Needs
Improvement" due to newest in position. Specifically, employees who are
meeting your learning curve expectations but because of their newest and
limited contributions they were placed in "Needs Improvement".

You should plan to discuss your development plan with your employee(s)
between now and January 31, 2001.

Please contact me prior to meeting with the employee so I can assist with
your plans. Call if you have any questions, I can be reached on (713)
345-3662.


I see no downside to calling the question on California ISO Governance.  The
CAISO staff was ready to move forward on a proposal that was not too
inconsistent with the DStar and RTO West.  As a result, there was a good
chance that seams issues could be addressed before the other two RTOs start
up.  At  yesterday's Western Seams Task Force meeting, the California rep had
to make it clear that everything was on hold until the new political (my
words not his) board was educated.  In addition, the Governor has hired his
own consultants.  It was the California's understanding that the legislation
passed limits the ability of the CA-ISO to agree to any seams solutions
unless endorsed by California State Government.  The current situation seems
to guarantee a stalemate and put an enormous drag on all RTO development in
the West.  It won't get any better if we wait.  It would be better to
challenge now, before this new board starts making decisions based on
political expediency.

	Susan J Mara@ENRON
	02/05/2001 10:11 AM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Cal ISO Not Filing CM Proposal at FERC - EPMI Response?

We can certainly launch if we like, but I believe that WPTF is planning to do
it as well.  We can let them (I's try to force them to use Bracewell, but
can't guarantee I'd win) or do our own and have them join with us.  Either
way, you know me, let's go for it!!

	Richard Shapiro
	02/05/2001 06:47 AM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Cal ISO Not Filing CM Proposal at FERC - EPMI Response?

I say we launch on ISO governance soon, preferably through EPSA, but alone if
necessary. We need to force FERC's hand with a well-thought out pleading on
why they have to enforce order on independent governance and why a
politicized CAL ISO is a recipe for disaster. Are we waiting on anything I'm
not aware of?

From: James D Steffes on 02/01/2001 04:59 PM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Cal ISO Not Filing CM Proposal at FERC - EPMI Response?

Mary informs me that the Cal ISO has filed (1-30-01) with FERC that it will
not be filing a new Congestion Management proposal at FERC as required in
previous Orders.

She thinks now is an opportune time to challenge the legitimacy of the new
Cal ISO Board (Gov Davis' actions).   I also think that we need to put
forward our own solution (if we have one).

I would appreciate everyone's opinion as to the (a) likelihood that FERC
would finally address the matter, (b) end result if FERC does deal with the
issue, (c) and the politics in Sacramento / CPUC of taking this position.
Also, who else is going to weigh in on our proposal?

Jim


I am not sure we are looking for anybody at this level but she maybe able to help with retail risk syndications.

Any thoughts?

Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Angela
Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Bradford, William S.
Subject:	Resume of a person I worked with at American General

I do not know if you are looking for anyone right now in your group, but attached is the resume of a woman I used to work with at American General Corporation ("AGC").  She was an excellent business person.  I worked with her on private placement transactions.  One of the responsibilities of a private placement analyst at AGC was credit analysis.  If I can answer any questions about her let me know.  The only reason she is currently looking is because of the possible job losses following the acquisition of AGC by AIG.

Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3817
Houston, Texas 77019
Tel: (713) 345-8347
Fax: (713) 646-3393
e-mail: angela.davis@enron.com


It the dark recesses of my mind I recall that Honey has a form to fill out.
However, that doesn't keep us from distributing $.  We just need to keep
enough to pay CT to file the documents.

Congratulations, that was quite a feat.

Time for a Fish wake?

Kay

"Turner, Gerry (Allstates)" <TurnerGerry@bek.com> on 07/14/2000 08:17:31 AM
To: kmann@enron.com
cc: HAsworth@Technip.com

Subject: Angler's

OK-----I finally have the last (Bailey) signature on those going out of
business documents.  What shall I do with them?  When can we write checks
and be done with all this?

Gerry Turner


NGPL Recontracts with NIPSCO

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (NGPL) continues to move through the
recontracting
process like a hot knife through butter. Since Kinder Morgan took over NGPL
parent KN Energy
last year, the interstate pipeline subsidiary has signed multiple agreements
and contract
extensions for gas transportation and storage with its major shippers in the
Midwest, including
another deal announced yesterday with Northern Indiana Public Service
(NIPSCO).

NGPL and NIPSCO signed a contract extending the terms of several firm
transportation
agreements totaling 295,100 MMBtu/d of capacity beginning Dec. 1, 2000 and
Dec. 1, 2001
and continuing through Nov. 30, 2002. They also extended the terms of two
storage agreements
totaling 10.5 Bcf of capacity beginning Dec. 1, 2000 and April 1, 2001 and
continuing through
March 31, 2003. NIPSCO, a NiSource subsidiary, is a regulated utility that
provides natural gas
o nearly 700,000 customers and electricity to 416,000 customers across the
northern third of Indiana.

"Virtually all of our operationally available capacity is sold out now until
the fourth quarter of this
year," said NGPL President Deborah Mcdonald in an interview.

"Basically about a third of the transportation contracts and a third of the
storage contracts are
up for renewal every year. We've been very successful in our efforts
resigning our three major
customers [NiGas, NIPSCO and Peoples]." Despite increasing competitive
pressure from
Northern Border and Alliance Pipeline, the pipeline also has had surprising
luck signing
agreements with marketers and power generators.

"In contrast to the traditional market of long-haul transportation from the
Midcontinent and
Louisiana to Chicago, we have been extending our horizons trying to find a
new market in
the marketers rather than the core LDCs. Obviously the contract that we
signed earlier this
year with Aquila Energy for 500,000 MMBtu of transportation capacity has also
really helped
us be successful in our recontracting efforts," Mcdonald said.

"We also have developed a number of new rate services for gas-fired power
generators.
Growth in NGPL will come from natural gas-fired generation. You probably saw
our press
release about the Ameren contracts for [construction of 1,700 MW of
generation along the
NGPL system]. In the aggregate we think we are on target to connect over
3,000 MW of
gas-fired generation this year and over 3,000 MW next year as well [which
would represent
up to 900 MMcf/d in gas transportation capacity].

"Obviously another challenge is going to be [the 1.325 Bcf/d] Alliance
Pipeline coming into
the market this fall. It's anyone's guess whether that will really fill up in
a short period of time.
I think a lot of that will be coming into Chicago and moving back out on
Vector. But we're
ready at Hub America to kind of serve as a giant header system [with Texas
Eastern as
an eastbound partner]."

Mcdonald was not prepared, however, to announce the results of a recent open
season
for about 100 MMcf/d of capacity that will be available through a new
interconnection between
NGPL and Tetco for eastbound transportation.


Kevin,

There have been several things change as of late in my life.
One ,  we are not buying a townhouse anymore, we still have to sell our lot.
Kay is going to stay at a townhouse near downtown and as of today i am looking for an apartment.
I came to the realization that I got way off track , as I usually do , with the plan of both of us
getting a place on our own for six months and going from there. I can not tell you how grateful I
have been for the support both you and Nancy have given me during this time in my life.
I know i have not been at your house as of late and that is due to being off track of the plan.
Is it ok for me to be at your house on and off for the next couple of weeks as i get an apartment set up ?
I will be working on renting a place that starts the 1st of the month.

Let me know

dq


Jeff Nogid
Enron Global Finance
713-853-4782
----- Forwarded by Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT on 04/03/01 09:07 AM -----

	"Fleming, Matthew" <mfleming@lehman.com>
	04/03/01 08:26 AM

		 To: "'jeff.nogid@enron.com'" <jeff.nogid@enron.com>
		 cc: "Kakar, Rahul S" <rkakar@lehman.com>
		 Subject: Forward Terms

Jeff,

As discussed yesterday, please find attached the final numbers for the
forward rolls as well as the put options.  The only thing to note is that as
Enron pays dividends, the forward prices will be adjusted downward
accordingly.

 <<ENE - Forward Roll.xls>>

Please call if there are any questions.
Regards,
Matt

Matt Fleming
Corporate Equity Derivatives
Lehman Brothers, Inc.
Phone: (212) 526-8030
Fax: (212) 526-2755

This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This
communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as
an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial
product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official
statement of Lehman Brothers Inc., its subsidiaries or affiliates.  Email
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we
do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should
not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without
notice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This
communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as
an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial
product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official
statement of Lehman Brothers Inc.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to
be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this
information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as
such.  All information is subject to change without notice.

 - ENE - Forward Roll.xls


Please click on the attached link to launch your Holiday Party invitation.

 http://invitation.enron.com

Please direct any questions to Dorie Hitchcock via email.


Parcel 8871 has been allocated as follows:

Bid number 3855 has been awarded to Canadian Natural Resources Limited for capacity release parcel 8871.

Releasing Shipper: Enron North America Corp.
Path: Kingsgate to Malin
Begin Date: 12/1/2001
End Date: 10/31/2003
Amount Awarded: 10000
Bid Amount: 100.0
Price Denomination: Percent Of Max Tariff Rate

System Award Message: Non-biddable parcel allocated in full to pre-arranged shipper

Bid number 3855 was awarded under new contract number 08171.

-------------------------------------------------

For additional information, contact our services and contracting department at (503) 833-4300.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


Paula M. Lee
Client Services
Enron Networks
713-853-6270


Here are the questions from Allegheny regarding Gleason.
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000
07:22 PM ---------------------------

"Irwin, Thomas J." <TIRWIN@alleghenyenergy.com> on 10/19/2000 06:59:46 PM
To: "'benjamin.rogers@enron.com'" <benjamin.rogers@enron.com>
cc: "'mitch.robinson@enron.com'" <mitch.robinson@enron.com>, "Stang, H. Roy"
<hstang@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Lapcevic, Joseph P."
<JLAPCEV@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Pezze, Thomas A."
<TPEZZE@alleghenyenergy.com>, "'paul.f.burton@ssmb.com'"
<paul.f.burton@ssmb.com>
Subject: ENRON -- Information requests resulting from Gleason site visit

The following requests resulted from our site visit to Gleason Plant on
October 19, 2000:
1. Regarding the three CTs purchased and installed at Gleason, when was
the reservation agreement signed?
2. Please provide CD with Construction Drawings and Plot Plan
identified on DealBench.  Please include Seimens drawings.
3. Please point out in DealBench or provide separate the documents that
contain operating budget for Gleason.  Discussions identified a year 2000
budget versus actual report and a 2001 draft budget.  These two would be
adequate.
4. Please provide engineering details of RTU module and associated
equipment used for plant dispatch.
5. Please provide the O&M contract with Operational Energy Corporation.
6. Please provide water chemistry analysis for wells or identify
document on DealBench.
7. Please provide lease on property with Industrial Development Board.
8. Please provide any available information on Westinghouse contract.
9. Please provide chart and guarantee curves for CTs.
10. Please provide your calculations supporting the 915 hour annual
operating limit.
11. Please identify equivalent starts for each CT.
12. Please provide copy of standard operating procedure for the plant.
13. Please provide hydrological studies on aquifer used for plant water.
Please provide forecast of Price volatility for ECAR, TVA, and M


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
05:04 PM ---------------------------

Don Miller
12/07/2000 05:02 PM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Redlined PSA -- Brownsville and Caledonia

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 05:01 PM
---------------------------

japearson@duke-energy.com on 12/07/2000 12:31:06 PM
To: stuart.zisman@enron.com
cc: dthudson@duke-energy.com, mhhurtado@duke-energy.com, don.miller@enron.com
Subject: Redlined PSA -- Brownsville and Caledonia

Stuart - At Dan Hudson's request, I am forwarding a redlined version of the
referenced agreement.  The attached is marked against the last version of
the PSA submitted by DENA to Enron.  Please call if any questions.  Thanks.
Jane Pearson, 713/627-5318.  Jane

(See attached file: enronpsared.doc)
 - enronpsared.doc


For those who attended the FERC meeting yesterday, can anyone elaborate on the reference in the Energy Daily article today that said Pat Wood remarked at the meeting that the Barton RTO language is "balanced" and that he likes it.  I am working on our own and helping EPSA with their comments on the Barton language which is, as we know, a retrenchment from current law and FERC's plans on RTOs.  But if Pat Wood likes it and thinks it is "balanced" that undercuts our position.  Since the trade press is not always accurate, I thought I would first check with those of you who were there.  Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
06:04 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
09/01/2000 04:37 PM
To: vkaminski@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Papers


Here's a rough draft of a different approach to assignment.  Do you think it
fits with the possible structures?

Kay


The only paper we have with Superior Water is a Master Sale Spot contract.  I
can negotiate a GISB if you want.  What kind of deal are you doing as far as
term?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Attached please find the complaint for Bustamante v. Dynegy, et al.
 <<Bustamante v. Dynegy.cmplt.pdf>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - Bustamante v. Dynegy.cmplt.pdf


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Vandivier [mailto:tomvandivier@ev1.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:35 AM
To: Ann Brodnax; Carleton Wilkes; Jerry Mazzaferro; jessica vandivier;
Laura Vandivier; Neil Mann; Phil Tinker; Ron Brock; Sonja Vandivier;
Stewart and Becky Williams
Subject: [Fwd: Taliban vs. Texans]

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <Whitt.Trimble@parsons.com>
To: Kopecky, Lewis </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=NOTESADDR/CN=B86BA4C-D800F8E1-86256AC5-7BB7CC>, Michael. Bible (E-mail) <Michael.Bible@Fluor.com>, Tom Vandivier (E-mail) <tomvandivier@ev1.net>, Wade Trimble (E-mail) <wade135@hotmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:50:59 GMT
Subject:

A large group of Taliban soldiers are moving down a road when they hear a
voice call from behind a sand dune.

"One Texas soldier is better than ten Taliban."

The Taliban commander quickly sends 10 of his best soldiers over the dune
whereupon a gun battle breaks out and continues for a few minutes, then
silence.

The voice then calls out "One Texan is better than one hundred Taliban."

Furious, the Taliban commander sends his next best 100 troops over the dune
and instantly a huge gunfight commences. After 10 minutes of battle, again
silence.

The Texan voice calls out again "One Texan is better than one thousand
Taliban."

The enraged Taliban Commander musters one thousand fighters and sends them
across the dune. Cannon, rocket and machine gun fire ring out as a huge
battle is fought. Then silence. Eventually one wounded Taliban fighter
crawls back over the dune and with his dying words tells his commander,
"Don't send any more men, its a trap. There's two of them."


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 4:25 PM
To:	Ward, Linda; Mulligan, Amy; Minter, Tracy
Subject:	TW Allocations

When doing allocation process and we allocate points or groups on the Timely, Evening, or Non-Grid.
We allocate with the capacities that are loaded from CAS.  When allocating points or groups that have
not previously been allocated on any of the previous cycles during ID-1 or ID-2 we need to use the flow rate calculation.
.
Example :  Allocations are as follows

The only point to be exempt from this method should be Socal Needles because of their window issue
Timely:        M/L Thoreau West System                1093.000  (capacity)
                   I/B Link                                             700.000  (capacity)
                   Laplata/Ignacio                                  500.000  (capacity)
                   Socal Needles                                   775.000  (Window)
Evening:      Same sequence
Non-Grid:     Same sequence

ID-1or ID-2:  Same sequence shows up to be allocated.
                   Since they were previously allocated on the earlier cycles we do not need to right mouse
                   click and calculate flow and update capacity based on flow rate.  The only time we should
                   have to calculate flow rate is when there is a new point or group shows up that has not been previously
                   allocated.

 The reason for the change is we have recieved more FERC data requests on capacities and scheduled volumes.
lets try this for a while and see how it is working.


Attached is the presentation I used for a very general update on
deregulation; it includes some California material.


Eric,

We are looking at the model. I shall get back to you next week.

vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Groves                           09/06/2000 08:55 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: wednesday meeting

Vince,

I was wondering if you or someone in your group has had a chance to overview
the LNG shipping model that I sent you.  Merritt Thomas is sending me more
data to add the to model on all of the other ports and nautical miles.  I
would like to to have your input on the functionality of this file before we
go farther.

Please call with any questions or comments.

Thanks,

Eric

Vince J Kaminski
09/06/2000 08:26 AM
To: Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: wednesday meeting

Eric,

I think we can skip the meeting and discuss any issues between us.
The meeting was convened at the request of Doug Arnell, but Jeff
Shankman thinks that there is no need for formal meetings: we can
ask them for the information directly on as needed basis.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Groves                           09/05/2000 11:01 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: wednesday meeting

are we still having the meeting tomorrow?  at what time?

thanks,

Eric


David:

Please send an email request to Cassandra Schultz and Veronica Valdez
requesting that the following Enron Credit Inc. traders be added to the ENA
Authorized Trader List (for the purpose of using ENA executed ISDA Master
Agreements in the credit trading area, such as Swiss Re and First Union
National Bank):

Jeff Kinneman
Nicholas Stephan
Paul Pizzolato

Please copy me and Marie Heard.  Call if you have any questions.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	All-Employee Meeting @ Hyatt Imperial Ballroom

Date:		2/21/2001
Time:		10:00 AM - 11:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Tom,

The conference in New York is held on  May 18 and May 19. I can visit Wharton
the day before.

Vince Kaminski

"Piazze, Thomas" <piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu> on 04/05/2000 08:40:55 AM
To: "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Test

Vince:  I enjoyed talking with you yesterday and look forward to receiving
information relative to your visit to campus.

TOM PIAZZE

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince J Kaminski [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 4:52 PM
> To: piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu
> Subject: Test
>
>
>
> Test
>


You may have already seen this.  AYE is above $47.00, barely $2.00 off its all time high.

Don
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 03:09 PM ---------------------------

dmille2@ect.enron.com on 04/10/2001 03:08:05 PM
To:	don.miller@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Yahoo - Allegheny Energy Announces Plans to Issue 10,000,000 Common  Shares

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/010409/2562.html

           AYE   47.24  +1.00    delayed 20 mins - disclaimer

Monday April 9, 12:48 pm Eastern Time

Press Release

Allegheny Energy Announces Plans to Issue 10,000,000 Common Shares

HAGERSTOWN, Md.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 9, 2001--Allegheny Energy, Inc. (NYSE: AYE  - news ) today announced its intent to issue approximately 10,000,000 shares of common stock. The offering is expected to be concluded by early May 2001.

All or a portion of the net proceeds of the transaction will be used to fund the acquisition of generating facilities. Any proceeds not used in the acquisition of these generating facilities will be used for general corporate purposes.

The joint book-running managers are Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Merrill Lynch & Co., with co-managers Bank of America Securities LLC, JP Morgan, Salomon Smith Barney, and SunTrust Equitable Securities.

The underwriters also will have a 30-day option to purchase up to 1,500,000 additional shares to cover any over-allotments of shares.

This offering will be made by a prospectus only. A copy of the prospectus may be obtained from the underwriters.

This notice shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these shares of common stock in any state in which such offer, solicitation, or sale would be unlawful prior to the registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state.

An S&P 500 company, Allegheny Energy, Inc. is a diversified energy company headquartered in Hagerstown, Md. The Allegheny Energy family includes Allegheny Power, which delivers electric energy and natural gas to about three million people in parts of Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia; Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC, which owns, operates, and markets competitive retail and wholesale electric generation; and Allegheny Ventures, which actively invests in and develops telecommunications and energy-related projects.

Certain statements within constitute forward-looking statements with respect to Allegheny Energy, Inc. (``AYE'' or the ``Company''). Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of AYE to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors may affect AYE's operations, markets, products, services, and prices. Such factors include, among others, the following: weather and natural phenomena; general and economic and business conditions; industry capacity; changes in technology; changes in political, social, and economic conditions; changes in the price of electricity and gas; changes in environmental and other laws; regulatory matters; litigation involving AYE; regulatory conditions applicable to AYE; the loss of any significant customers; and changes in business strategy or development plans.

Contact:

Allegheny Energy, Inc.
     Debra Beck
     General Manager, Corporate Communications
     Phone: 301-790-6177
     Media Hotline: 1-888-233-3583

Email this story  - Most-emailed articles  - Most-viewed articles

More Quotes and News:	Allegheny Energy Inc (NYSE:AYE  - news )
	Related News Categories: oil/energy , utilities

Help

Copyright ? 2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
Copyright ? 2001 Business Wire. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Business Wire are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

Questions or Comments?


Did you make your reservation?


Tana

Is it possible to get electronic file for the Enron North America and Peoples
Energy Corporation ISDA?  Is it in Word?  I am trying to get our new JV,
Midwest Energy Hub, to utilize our format for the template for MEH.

Thanks
Molly

a.huprikar@pecorp.com on 08/17/2000 03:48:36 PM
To: molly.harris@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ENA ISDA with PEC

Molly,

Could you send me an electronic version of the ISDA that was signed between
ENA and PEC. I understand from our attorney that we did not work with an
electronic version, only a hard copy. In order to create an ISDA template
for MEH, I need the electronic version.

Thanks

Aparna

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.


The vision is coming into focus and it has a new name!

Over the past several months, the IT Help Desks at Enron Net Works have
incorporated new processes and methodologies to optimize customer service
delivery.  As part of this effort, we have implemented a new name -
Resolution Center.   The following IT Help Desks are included in this
initiative:

Enron Corporation   3.1411
Enron North America  3.4888
International Offices  6.7757

For more information, look for our ads on ETV, the posters on the 6th floor
in 3 Allen Center and in the Lobby of the Enron Building, or visit
http://itcentral.enron.com.

To learn more about our new services, come visit members of the Resolution
Center team in the Enron Building Lobby between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. on
Tuesday, September 5th.  We look forward to seeing you there!


I got a voice-mail from Dean Vanek, Scottsborough's general counsel, just a
moment ago.  He has just come off a road trip and had a chance to read my
telefax.  Vanek will apparently send me some of the documentation I
requested, although it is not clear that he will send me the documents that
reflect that all the loads for which Scottsborough is being sued were in fact
purchased from MG Metals.

My last question on my telefax to Vanek was what attorney Vanek would
typically retain in a lawsuit such as this to defend Scottsborough.  Vanek
said in his voice-mail that in this suit, he does not intend to hire an
attorney.  Vanek said he would pay whatever the carrier was suing for, then
deduct that amount from whatever Scottsborough owes us for aluminum.  Then,
contradicting himself, Vanek said that he would join MG Metals as a party
(which would of course require him to retain an attorney).  I assume that he
probably could join us as a party on a breach of contract theory, given that
Scottsborough purchased the metal from us "freight prepaid".   I'm not sure
that an Alabama court has personal jurisdiction over Enron Metals sufficient
to allow joinder, but it might.

Vanek also seemed irritated at the time MG Metals had taken to reply to his
earlier communications, and directed me to our Montreal office if I wanted
copies of things he had previously sent to us.  Of course, we all decided
some time ago to take a "let sleeping dogs lie" strategy in hopes that a
carrier like Alabama wouldn't actually file suit.  In any case, I don't know
how much of this apparent irritation is real or is strategy.

I called Vanek back and again missed him, but left a voice-mail to the effect
that I read his message "loud and clear" and would jump on reviewing the
exhibits he was sending me as soon as I received them.  I told him that I was
particularly interested in them because if the bs/l were marked "freight
prepaid", then Scottsborough may have a good defense to the carrier's case.

As you may recall, ICTS has been joined as a party to this action.  ICTS is
the party that didn't pay the carrier.  I try to call ICTS and see what it
intends to do in this matter.

Britt


Patti,

Here is the information you requested for the Conference in October.  I
listed the information I will need to make final booking arrangements on the
first spreadsheet.  There is a spreadsheet for dates-locations, directions,
and conference package info..  If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to contact me.  Call me after you review, so we can get together to
finalize details.

Thank you,

Julissa Marron, x58336


How important is this fight to us now (see attached article on ExIm)?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 10:41 AM -----

	Ann M Schmidt
	03/07/2001 08:19 AM

		 To: Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: (bcc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron)
		 Subject: Enron Mentions

Exporters Rush to Ex-Im Bank's Defense --- Lobby Campaign to Prevent Budget
Cuts Seeks Help Of 100,000 Small Firms
The Wall Street Journal, 03/07/01

Plots & Ploys
The Wall Street Journal, 03/07/01

Dutch Gas Competition Grows Despite Sluggish Reforms
Dow Jones Energy Service, 03/07/01

USA: Big U.S. exporters to fight Ex-Im Bank cuts - WSJ.
Reuters English News Service, 03/07/01

Major U.S. Exporters Rush to Export-Import Bank's Defense
Dow Jones Business News, 03/07/01

What's News
United States
The Globe and Mail, 03/07/01

Deal with state could take until 2002 to close
Associated Press Newswires, 03/06/01

Sierra Pacific CEO Doubts SEC OK Of Enron Unit Buy-Report
Dow Jones Energy Service, 03/06/01

Many Power Deals Announced by California Governor Still Not Final
Dow Jones Business News, 03/06/01

US Natural Gas Prices Fall As Demand Slips In Most Areas
Dow Jones Energy Service, 03/06/01

Economy
Exporters Rush to Ex-Im Bank's Defense --- Lobby Campaign to Prevent Budget
Cuts Seeks Help Of 100,000 Small Firms
By Michael M. Phillips and Laura Heinauer
Staff Reporters of The Wall Street Journal

03/07/2001
The Wall Street Journal
A2
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

WASHINGTON -- Angry and confused that a Republican administration has
targeted one of their favorite programs for big cuts, America's largest
exporters are appealing for help from lawmakers.
Boeing Co., Caterpillar Inc., Enron Corp., Halliburton Co. and others are
launching an aggressive lobbying campaign on Capitol Hill to protect the
Export-Import Bank from budget reductions; the White House labels the Ex-Im
Bank as corporate welfare.
"The administration has fired its shot, and now we're firing ours," said
Edmund B. Rice, president of the Coalition for Employment Through Exports, an
industry group that is leading the effort.
Since they got wind of the proposed cuts a few weeks ago, business lobbyists
have been trying to rally sympathetic lawmakers. And executives at Boeing,
Caterpillar and other big companies plan to contact some 100,000 smaller
suppliers that benefit indirectly from the $12.6 billion of export loans,
guarantees and insurance that Ex-Im Bank provided in the last fiscal year.
Those small companies, the executives hope, will create a groundswell of
support in Congress for the Ex-Im Bank.
"Companies large and small who have similar interests here are banding
together to provide an educational effort so people understand the impact of
this," said Chris Hansen, Boeing senior vice president for government
relations.
Corporate lobbyists also have dug up a speech that Vice President Dick
Cheney, while chief executive of Halliburton, gave in 1997 praising the bank
and scoffing at those who consider it a giveaway to big business. They plan
to pass Mr. Cheney's comments to influential members of Congress this week.
"We'll be circulating them very broadly," Mr. Rice said.
A spokeswoman for Mr. Cheney had no immediate comment.
Ex-Im Bank officials aren't talking publicly, avoiding the appearance that
they are battling the White House to overturn the proposed 25% cut in the
bank's $865 million operating budget for the current fiscal year, which ends
Sept. 30. But an Ex-Im official said the topic has come up in conversations
between key lawmakers and Ex-Im Bank Chairman James A. Harmon, who is soon to
be succeeded by Mel Sembler, a Bush campaign fund-raiser and a
shopping-center developer.
At first, business lobbyists assumed administration budgeteers were just
looking for savings anywhere they could find it. Before President Bush
released his spending plan last week, companies appealed to Mitchell Daniels,
head of the White House budget office, in an attempt to keep the Ex-Im Bank
cuts out of the final proposal.
The Ex-Im Bank's corporate clients include some of the country's largest
political contributors. Boeing, the bank's largest user, received $3.3
billion of financing last year. The Seattle aerospace company and its
employees contributed $1.8 million to politicians and parties during the 2000
election cycle, 61% to Republicans, according to federal election data
assembled by the Center for Responsive Politics. Caterpillar, a Peoria, Ill.,
maker of engines and heavy equipment that secured seven Ex-Im Bank deals last
year, and its employees contributed more than $500,000 -- 96% to Republicans.
Company officials deny they wanted to leverage donations to try to secure
political support for the Ex-Im Bank.
Many lobbyists have come to the conclusion that administration officials --
those of a libertarian persuasion -- oppose Ex-Im Bank as a form of welfare
for corporations. Indeed, the White House budget plan criticized the bank's
operations as unjustified public subsidies for companies. "That makes it a
much more serious issue," Mr. Rice said. "We're concerned that the
administration seems to be turning its attention in this direction."
Barring intervention from Mr. Cheney, business groups now have largely given
up hope of convincing the White House to back down, planning instead to use
their muscle to convince Congress to restore the Ex-Im Bank's funding. Bank
officials and U.S. companies argue that, far from being a subsidy, the bank
simply allows American companies to compete with European and Japanese firms
that receive assistance from their own governments.
"In many markets in Asia and Africa, the bank is absolutely critical to our
ability to sell American-made products," said Bill Lane, Caterpillar's
Washington director for governmental affairs.
--- Corporate Beneficiaries

Top 10 recipients of Ex-Im Bank loans, guarantees and insurance for
fiscal year 2000, as measured by amount of financing, in millions

Boeing $3,335
Bechtel Group $1,075
Distributed Processing Systems $388
Willbros Group $387
United Technologies $334
Raytheon $156
General Electric $150
Halliburton $136
Enron $135
LSI Logic $120

Source: Ex-Im Bank

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The Property Report
Plots & Ploys
By Peter Grant

03/07/2001
The Wall Street Journal
B10
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

[What's Brewing in the Real Estate Market]
No Problem, Houston
CENTURY DEVELOPMENT is about to announce plans to break ground on downtown
Houston's third major office development in less than three years. In another
sign of the strength of the city's energy sector, Century is finalizing a
headquarters deal with Reliant Resources Inc. to take more than two-thirds of
the project's 850,000 square feet, says Edwin Murphy, a Century senior vice
president.
Two other towers also are underway. In 1999, Hines began building a 1.2
million square-foot tower for Enron Corp. and late last year Crescent Real
Estate Equities broke ground on a 27-story tower that will be anchored by
Ernst & Young. These three projects are the first major downtown office
projects to get underway since 1986.
The surge is part of a renaissance of downtown Houston, where new sports
facilities, hotels, apartment buildings and restaurants have been mushrooming
in recent years. "The new amenities have kept people from leaving and enticed
people to come back," says Michael Hassler, of CB Richard Ellis.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Dutch Gas Competition Grows Despite Sluggish Reforms
By Germana Canzi
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

03/07/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

LONDON -(Dow Jones)- The Netherlands is emerging as an important testing
ground for E.U. gas liberalization, as new trading hubs for competitive,
short-term gas supplies from the U.K. and Norway emerge on the Belgian and
German borders.
However, much remains to be done. A group of large energy users and traders
is preparing to confront Gasunie Thursday in a hearing organized by the
regulator. The main issues of contention are the balancing system, which
Gasunie conducts on an hourly basis, the extent to which transport tariffs
are cost-focused and third-party access to storage facilities.
The emergence of competition in the Dutch gas sector is mostly due to the
initiative of new market entrants who, despite a difficult regulatory
environment, have managed to develop a market for short-term gas virtually
from scratch.
If liquidity improves in these emerging hubs, the Netherlands could become an
important transit country for freely tradeable gas supplies to other
countries in northwest Europe, as well as being an important market in its
own right. However, the difficulty of implementing transparent third-party
access systems in the Netherlands and in neighboring Germany casts a dark
cloud over recent progress in competition.
Since December, Enron Europe Ltd. (U.ENE), Duke Energy Corp. (DUK), E.On AG
(EON), RWE AG (G.RWE) and Electrabel SA (B.ELE) have been actively buying and
selling gas, sourced in the U.K., the Netherlands and Norway, in a number of
hubs between Emden in Germany and Emshaven and Oude Statenzijl in the
Netherlands.
David Gallagher, head of European gas trading at Enron in London, estimates
that at least one trade a day of around 100,000 therms for a quarterly
contract is done at the Oude Statenzijl hub, where the Gasunie pipeline
system connects to the network of Wingas GmbH.
An important element kick-starting short-term trading was the sale, in
December 2000, of a 2 billion cubic meter a year Norwegian gas supply
contract to five Dutch-based power generators.
Robert van der Hoeven, head of fuel procurement at Electrabel, the owner of
Dutch generator EPON, said his company uses most of the gas it imports from
Norway for its plants in the Netherlands and trades the rest on a short-term
basis in the Oude-Emden area. This pattern is common to the other Dutch-based
parties to that contract.
Trading in Dutch hubs received a further boost when Nederlandse Gasunie NV
(N.NEG) decided, after months of wrangling with regulator DTe, to lower its
transport tariffs by 6.5% from January 2001 and to unbundle its combined
commodity and service tariff, the so-called CSS system, from July 2001.
Gasunie now claims its pipeline system is fully open and transparent. To
prove this, it says it has lost 30% of its customers in the eligible market,
but that figure hasn't changed much since March 2000. Small wonder that
critics say the switching figure doesn't necessarily indicate an ideal system
of third-party access.
According to energy consultants The Brattle Group, around half of the gas
used by alternative suppliers goes through the 1 bcm/year Zebra pipeline from
Zelzate to Zeeland, which was built by Dutch utilities a few years ago
precisely because Gasunie refused to provide access on favorable terms.
Shippers have complained that the hourly system used by Gasunie to balance
the pipeline system raises the overall cost of shipping through its network
significantly. Gasunie imposes a balancing charge which effectively forces
shippers to pay for the extra gas brought into the system from storage sites,
in addition to the capacity and transmission price. Critics say Gasunie has
so far failed to unbundle these charges, although it agreed to do so in
January.
According to the Brattle Group, another controversial aspect of Gasunie's
tariff system is that it is based on theoretical costs of constructing new
pipelines rather than its actual costs.
The DTe is also considering ways of reforming the storage system to make it
competitive. BP PLC (U.BP) and Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij NV operate
storage facilities and lease capacity to Gasunie through long-term contracts.
The regulator is studying ways of allowing third parties access to storage
facilities. Gasunie has so far shown little sign of negotiating more
competitive tariffs with storage operators and passing on the benefits to
customers, critics say.
The growth of short-term trading in the Dutch gas market is also inevitably
linked to its potential as a transit country for gas coming from the
U.K.-Belgium gas interconnector and going towards the 82bcm-a-year German
market.
Market participants say liquidity at the Emden and Oude hubs has grown
considerably since E.On and RWE started trading there earlier this year.
However, the obstructive attitude of incumbents toward third-party access
there has meant that so far most gas traded in the Netherlands has remained
there.
-By Germana Canzi, Dow Jones Newswires; +44 20 7842 9283;
germana.canzi@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

USA: Big U.S. exporters to fight Ex-Im Bank cuts - WSJ.

03/07/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

NEW YORK, March 7 (Reuters) - America's largest exporters are launching an
aggressive lobbying campaign on Capitol Hill to protect the Export-Import
Bank from budget reductions, the Wall Street Journal reported in its online
edition on Wednesday.
The exporters, including Boeing Co. , Caterpillar Inc. , Enron Corp. ,
Halliburton Co. and others, are angry and confused that a Republican
administration has targeted one of their favourite programmes for big cuts,
the paper reported.
Ex-Im Bank officials were not talking publicly, avoiding the appearance that
they are battling the White House to overturn the proposed 25 percent cut in
the bank's $865 million operating budget for the current fiscal year, which
ends Sept 30, it said.
The White House labels the Ex-Im Bank as corporate welfare.
"The administration has fired its shot, and now we're firing ours," Edmund
Rice, president of the Coalition for Employment Through Exports, an industry
group that is leading the effort, was quoted as saying by the paper.
Executives at Boeing, Caterpillar and other big companies plan to contact
some 100,000 smaller suppliers who benefit indirectly from the $12.6 billion
of export loans, guarantees and insurance that Ex-Im Bank provided in the
last fiscal year, the paper said.
Those small companies, the executives hope, will create a groundswell of
support in Congress for the Ex-Im Bank, it said.
New York Newsroom (212) 859-1700.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Major U.S. Exporters Rush to Export-Import Bank's Defense

03/07/2001
Dow Jones Business News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

WASHINGTON -- Angry and confused that a Republican administration has
targeted one of their favorite programs for big cuts, America's largest
exporters are appealing for help from lawmakers, Wednesday's Wall Street
Journal reported.
Boeing Co. (BA), Caterpillar Inc. (CAT), Enron Corp. (ENE), Halliburton Co.
(HAL) and others are launching an aggressive lobbying campaign on Capitol
Hill to protect the Export-Import Bank from budget reductions; the White
House labels the Ex-Im Bank as corporate welfare.
"The administration has fired its shot, and now we're firing ours," said
Edmund B. Rice, president of the Coalition for Employment Through Exports, an
industry group that is leading the effort.
Since they got wind of the proposed cuts a few weeks ago, business lobbyists
have been trying to rally sympathetic lawmakers. And executives at Boeing,
Caterpillar and other big companies plan to contact some 100,000 smaller
suppliers that benefit indirectly from the $12.6 billion of export loans,
guarantees and insurance that Ex-Im Bank provided in the last fiscal year.
Those small companies, the executives hope, will create a groundswell of
support in Congress for the Ex-Im Bank.
Corporate lobbyists also have dug up a speech that Vice President Dick
Cheney, while chief executive of Halliburton, gave in 1997 praising the bank
and scoffing at those who consider it a giveaway to big business. They plan
to pass Mr. Cheney's comments to influential members of Congress this week.
A spokeswoman for Mr. Cheney had no immediate comment.
Ex-Im Bank officials aren't talking publicly, avoiding the appearance that
they are battling the White House to overturn the proposed 25% cut in the
bank's $865 million operating budget for the current fiscal year, which ends
Sept. 30. But an Ex-Im official said the topic has come up in conversations
between key lawmakers and Ex-Im Bank Chairman James A. Harmon, who is soon to
be succeeded by Mel Sembler, a Bush campaign fund-raiser and a
shopping-center developer.
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Report on Business: The Wall Street Journal
What's News
United States
Wall Street Journal

03/07/2001
The Globe and Mail
Metro
B10
"All material Copyright (c) Bell Globemedia Publishing Inc. and its
licensors. All rights reserved."

Boeing Co., Caterpillar Inc. and Enron Corp. are among the big U.S. exporters
launching an aggressive lobbying campaign on Capitol Hill to protect the
Export-Import Bank from budget reductions. The White House labels the Ex-Im
Bank as corporate welfare. "The administration has fired its shot, and now
we're firing ours," said Edmund Rice, president of the Coalition for
Employment Through Exports, an industry group leading the campaign. Since
they got wind of the proposed cuts a few weeks ago, business lobbyists have
been trying to rally sympathetic U.S. law makers.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Deal with state could take until 2002 to close
By LESLIE GORNSTEIN
AP Business Writer

03/06/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

LOS ANGELES (AP) - A tentative deal aimed at rescuing Southern California
Edison from insolvency might not close in time to prevent the utility from
begging creditors for more patience, Edison officials said Tuesday.
The utility's tentative, $2.7 billion agreement to sell its power lines to
the state could take until 2002 to be consummated, thanks to complicated
legal issues and other paperwork, an Edison official told bondholders Tuesday.
Once the deal is signed, Edison will try to borrow against the promised cash,
but Edison International Chief Financial Officer Ted Craver admitted the
utility might have to ask creditors to simply wait for their money until it
has the $2.7 billion in hand.
Energy suppliers owed money by Edison did not immediately return calls for
comment Tuesday.
At least four groups of suppliers have sued Edison for millions in unpaid
bills going back months. Edison and fellow utility Pacific Gas & Electric
have said they have lost $13 billion on the open power market thanks to
soaring prices paired with state-imposed price caps.
PG&E's parent company was able to recently borrow $1 billion to pay its
stockholders and its debuts. It did not use any of that money to pay PG&E's
bills.
Edison's disclosure, meanwhile, shocked state officials.
Steve Maviglio, spokesman for Gov. Gray Davis, initially declined to comment
on the status of the Edison deal, but eventually said, regarding its closure,
"We're optimistic it will be sooner rather than later."
The pacing would have nothing to do with whether fellow utilities Sempra
Energy and PG&E also sell their transmission lines to California, Craver
said.
Among the things that could delay the deal's closing is Edison's need to find
landowners on whose property its lines were built to assure no legal
agreements are being violated by the sale. Edison would also have to pin down
exactly what it would be selling to the state - terms that might not be
decided until after a deal has been inked, Craver said.
"Trust me," Craver said in a phone call after the conference. "There are a
lot of legal-type documents - stuff that you and I ... would think of as a
bloody nightmare."
The disclosure comes at a time when an increasing number of power suppliers
are suing the utility for millions in unpaid bills.
Edison also disclosed Tuesday that two more lawsuits had landed in its lap -
one by a group of wind-powered generators including Enron Wind, the other by
two suppliers including New York-based Caithness Energy.
Both suits were filed during the past five days, Edison Assistant General
Counsel Barbara Reeves said. It was not immediately clear how much the
complainants were seeking; neither Enron nor Caithness returned calls for
comment.
The two filings bring the total number of suits by renewable-energy suppliers
against Edison to four, the utility said. The city of Long Beach and
CalEnergy Operating Group, a geothermal supplier, have also sued for back
payments.
CalEnergy alone has said it is owed $45 million in November and December
payments.
The line sale, part of a multifaceted, tentative deal with the state that
could save Edison from insolvency, could take anywhere from several months
into next year, Craver said.
The tentative deal, announced by Gov. Gray Davis Feb. 23, calls for the state
to pay more than twice the book value for Edison's lines.
It also would require Edison to sell cheap power to the state for a decade
and for Edison to end its lawsuit against state regulators. The suit asserts
that price caps imposed by the California Public Utilities Commission are
illegal under federal law.
Additionally, Edison's parent would have to return $420 million it collected
from the utility over the past several years. The money was used to pay debt,
buy back stock and pay dividends to investors.
SCE, PG&E and Sempra have complained they are near bankruptcy because of
soaring prices on the open market combined with the state-imposed price caps
for consumers.
Sempra and PG&E have yet to announce similar line-sale deals with the state,
though they and the governor have said negotiations are ongoing. The total
cost of the 26,000 miles of lines has been estimated at $4.5 billion to $7
billion.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Sierra Pacific CEO Doubts SEC OK Of Enron Unit Buy-Report

03/06/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- Sierra Pacific Resources (SRP) CEO Walter Higgins
said in an interview last week that he doubts the company's $3.1 billion
acquisition of Enron Corp.'s (ENE) utility Portland General Electric will be
approved by the federal Securities and Exchange Commission, the Las Vegas Sun
reported Tuesday.
The SEC must find that Sierra Pacific is in a strong financial position
before it will approve the deal, but the company is currently weakened by
having lost millions of dollars in fuel and purchased power costs, Higgins
said in the report.
A $311 million rate increase to cover those costs began March 1, but Higgins
said that money would only pay back those expenses and wouldn't improve the
company's stability to a level the SEC would find adequate, according to the
report.
The Public Utilities Commission can halt the rate hike and order refunds if
it decides the hike isn't necessary. The PUC is holding hearings to determine
the prudency of the hike, and members of the state's powerful casino and
mining industries have filed to intervene.
Sierra Pacific's plan to shore up its financial position through the sale of
its 10 power plants, worth nearly $2 billion, may also be in jeopardy. The
state Senate is considering a bill to block the sales, and Nevada Gov. Kenny
Guinn recently sent a letter to the PUC asking that it reconsider its order
allowing electric utilities to sell assets.
Financial analysts have said that not allowing Sierra Pacific's two utilities
to sell their assets would have a ripple effect on the company's financial
position. The asset sales are tied to low-priced power contracts, and if the
sales are canceled, the low-priced power will be gone as well.
"If the divestiture is stopped...the state may be dealing with a much bigger
rate increase," Steve Fleishman, Merrill Lynch utility analyst, told Dow
Jones Newswires recently.
Sierra Pacific is the parent company of electric utilities Sierra Pacific
Power Co. and Nevada Power, which serve customers in the state's North and
South, respectively.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872,
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com -0- 07/03/01 01-04G

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Many Power Deals Announced by California Governor Still Not Final
By Jason Leopold

03/06/2001
Dow Jones Business News
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

Dow Jones Newswires
LOS ANGELES -- Many of the long-term power-supply contracts announced by
California Gov. Gray Davis this week remain under negotiation or are the
subject of ongoing lawsuits, power suppliers said Tuesday.
The lack of finality to the deals raises questions about the state's success
in covering its power needs, particularly going into what is expected to be
an unusually tight summer.
Generators said privately they were surprised the governor went ahead with
his announcement Monday, given that many of the contracts haven't been
signed.
David Freeman, general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Water and
Power, who negotiated the contracts on behalf of the state, conceded that
details remain to be worked out. "This is not a done deal," Mr. Freeman said,
adding that credit concerns are keeping generators from signing the deals.
Gov. Davis announced Monday that California has secured 40 long-term
contracts that will provide California with about 629 million megawatt hours
of electricity over 10 years, at a price of more than $40 billion. A megawatt
hour is roughly the amount of electricity needed to power 1,000 homes.
Several of those forward deals, however, involve contracts originally held by
Edison International (EIX) unit Southern California Edison and PG&E Corp.
(PCG) unit Pacific Gas & Electric at the California Power Exchange,
previously the state's main power market.
The governor seized those contracts earlier this year, just before the Power
Exchange liquidated them to cover hundreds of millions of dollars in power
bills the utilities had failed to pay.
The contracts, which total about 1.3 million megawatt hours of electricity
and have a market value of about $1 billion, according to market sources,
have yet to be paid for or signed over to the state. Duke Energy Corp. (DUK),
one of the suppliers that sold the contracts to Pacific Gas and SoCal Ed, has
sued Gov. Davis for unlawfully commandeering those contracts.
Although Duke has reached an interim settlement to continue providing power
to the state Department of Water Resources until April 30, the company and
the Davis administration still have to "develop a comprehensive long-term
settlement to pay for the power supply contracts," said Duke spokesman Tom
Williams.
The governor went ahead with the announcement, because the California
Department of Water Resources believes it will be able to finalize and sign
the contracts over the next several weeks, Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio
said.
Separately, several suppliers named in the governor's announcement Monday --
including Duke, Reliant Energy Inc. (REI), Mirant Corp. (MIR), Sempra Energy,
Enron Corp. (ENE) and Avista Corp. (AVA) -- said they have yet to sign final
agreements with the state, although negotiations were ongoing.
"We are working in good faith with the DWR toward a long-term contract," said
Art Larson, spokesman for Sempra Energy Resources, a unit of Sempra. Mr.
Larson said Sempra signed a terms of agreement with the water-resources
department and expects to reach a final agreement over the next several
weeks.
Reliant said it has only signed a short-term contract with the state that
expires in about two weeks. The company will only sign a long-term contract
once it's paid more than $400 million owed by Pacific Gas and SoCal Ed,
spokesman Richard Wheatley said.
Mirant said it also won't sign contracts with the state until it's paid.
Enron said it's reached agreement on terms with the state, but has some
credit-related details to hammer out. "Everything's been agreed to except for
some credit technicalities," Enron spokesman Mark Palmer said.
Meanwhile, small, independent power plants in California that are capable of
generating 1,800 megawatts of power are shut down because their owners
haven't been paid by the state's two main utilities, the California
Independent System Operator said Tuesday.
The decline in small-plant output has contributed to the state's power-supply
problems the past two months. Partnerships involving El Paso Corp. (EPG), for
example, shut down 350 megawatts of generation last weekend due to
nonpayment, the company said Tuesday.
SoCal Ed hasn't paid the owners of the smaller generators, known as
"qualifying facilities," since early December, which means the generators are
still owed for electric production in October, while PG&E has paid only a
small percentage of its qualifying facility bills since its last full payment
in early January.
The plants, one-third of which are powered by renewable sources like wind and
solar power, meet almost 30% of California's electricity needs. Almost all of
the closed generators are fueled by natural gas, and many haven't been able
to pay their gas suppliers and have been cut off from their gas supply.
The California Senate Energy Committee plans to vote on legislation to create
a new pricing system for all qualifying facilities this week. The proposed
bill would cut the prices to qualifying facilities from about 17 cents a
kilowatt-hour the past eight months to about eight cents, depending on the
price of five-year natural-gas contracts the generators can sign. The plants
that run on renewable resources would be paid 5.4 cents a kilowatt-hour.
-- Mark Golden contributed to this article.
Write to Jason Leopold at jason.leopold@dowjones.com
Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
All Rights Reserved

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

US Natural Gas Prices Fall As Demand Slips In Most Areas

03/06/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

HOUSTON -(Dow Jones)- U.S. natural gas physical prices fell Tuesday as demand
eased, except in the Northeast and Southeast areas of the country, traders
said.
Heavy snowstorms in the upper Northeast supported some pricing, as did cooler
weather in Georgia, the Carolinas and the Florida panhandle.
Some storage buying occurred in Texas "if they could make it work," a trader
said.
"It was a pretty uneventful day," a Gulf Coast trader said late Tuesday.
Also, because of the snowstorm in the Northeast, traders had purchased gas
ahead of time to make up for needed load, he said.
A scheduled work outage on Enron's Transwestern San Juan lateral in New
Mexico was completed, and the return of a power plant in California
alleviated demand in the West, traders said.
At the Arizona-California border hub, buyers paid around $13-$33 a million
British thermal units, West Coast traders said, down as much as $15 from
Monday.
At PG&E Citygate, prices were mixed, with buyers paying $9.75-$10.65/MMBtu,
down 25 cents on the bid, up 15 cents on the offer.
In the Midwest, Chicago Citygate prices fell 7 cents-8 cents to a range of
$5.42-$5.53/MMBtu. Alliance Pipeline into Chicago traded around
$5.47-$5.52/MMBtu, down 4 cents to 9 cents from Monday.
The Nymex April natural gas futures contract settled at $5.315/MMBtu, down
2.1 cents in a tight, range-bound, uneventful session that started late due
to bad weather.
Physical gas prices at the benchmark Henry Hub in south Louisiana ended in a
range of $5.25-$5.30/MMBtu, down 2 cents-6 cents from Monday.
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line at Station 65 deals were made in a similar
range of $5.26-$5.35/MMBtu, down 2 cents on the bid, unchanged on the offer.
At Katy in East Texas, buyers paid $5.21-$5.30/MMBtu, down 5 cents-6 cents.
At Waha, prices fell 9 cents-12 cents to a range of $5.15-$5.30/MMBtu.
-By John Edmiston, Dow Jones Newswires; 713-547-9209;
john.edmiston@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000
04:51 PM ---------------------------

"patricia dalecka" <pdalecka@hotmail.com> on 12/15/2000 04:37:40 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Address

>From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>To: pdalecka@hotmail.com
>Subject: Address
>Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:31:30 -0600
>
>vkaminski@aol.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - CV.doc


let's go with dad in april.  you can go with those guys anytime.  plus you
will probably want to go again after we get back.


Hey, Carson.  It's too early for me to tell if this week will work.  It's pretty rought over here.  Let's touch base later this week.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"R. Carson Llewellyn" <carlew@flash.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 12:29 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Your Birthday

Hi Sara:

Happy Birthday. I had a great time in New Orleans but was unable to hook
up with Monty. Hopefully, I was able to succesfully forward to you my
reply to Donna's email about getting together this Thursday. I can not
wait to see you both. My cell number is 281-435-3672 if our plans need
to be changed. I will be out of town tomorrow and Wednesday, but back
Thursday. You can email me or leave a message at my office or call me on
my cell.

Take Care and see you Thursday,

Carson


I've changed 469388 to include a broker fee - trader mistake. Mike Driscoll
and Swerzbin swear that the other two should not include broker fees.
Driscoll just checked with the Natsource broker, who cleared this up with his
back office - so they should agree now. Let me know if there is still a
discrepancy. I believe the Natsource broker is changing this.

Thanks,
kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/11/2000 12:39 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: broker fees

457489 .0075
459812  .0075

i talked to you about these trades a couple of weeks ago.  the backoffice of
the broker got back to me on these deals and said there should be a fee.  can
you pls talk to the trader on these deals.

thanks

also can you check on this one
469388, broker has .0075


As you are aware, Enron utilizes temporary staffing services to satisfy
staffing requirements throughout the company.  For the past several months, a
project team, representing Enron,s temporary staffing users, have researched
and evaluated alternative Managed Services programs to determine which source
would best meet our current and future needs in terms of quality, performance
and cost containment objectives.  The Business Unit Implementation Project
Team members are:

Laurie Koenig, Operations Management, EES
Carolyn Vigne, Administration, EE&CC
Linda Martin, Accounting & Accounts Payable, Corporate
Beverly Stephens, Administration, ENA
Norma Hasenjager, Human Resources, ET&S
Peggy McCurley, Administration, Networks
Jane Ellen Weaver, Enron Broadband Services
Paulette Obrecht, Legal, Corporate
George Weber, GSS

In addition, Eric Merten (EBS), Kathy Cook (EE&CC), Carolyn Gilley (ENA),
Larry Dallman (Corp/AP), and Diane Eckels (GSS) were active members of the
Selection Project Team.

As a result of the team,s efforts, we are pleased to announce the beginning
of a strategic alliance with CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group.  This group
will function as a vendor-neutral management entity overseeing all staffing
vendors in the program scope. They will also provide a web based online
technology tool that will enhance the ordering and reporting capabilities.
The goal of our alliance with CORESTAFF is to make obtaining a temporary
worker with the right skills and experience easier while protecting the best
interests of the organization.

We plan to implement Phase I of this improvement effective January 2, 2001.
This Phase I of the implementation will encompass administrative/clerical
temporary workers at the Houston locations only. If you currently have
administrative/clerical temporary workers in your department, the enhancement
will not affect their position. In an effort to preserve relationships, all
current staffing vendors will be invited to participate in this enhanced
program.  CORESTAFF shares our commitment to minimize any disruptions in
service during this transition.

We expect to incorporate the administrative/clerical workers in Omaha,
Seattle and Portland in Phase II, which is scheduled for February, 2001.  The
scope and timing of any additional phases will be determined after these two
phases have been completed.

Realizing the impact that the temporary workforce has in business today, we
selected CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group based on their exceptional
management team, commitment to quality service, and creative solutions to our
staffing needs.  The relationship promises to offer Enron a cost effective
and simple means for obtaining temporary employees.

In the coming weeks, Enron and CORESTAFF,s Managed Services Group will be
communicating to Enron,s administrative/clerical temporary staffing vendors
about the new process.

There are many benefits to this new Managed Services program, which are
outlined on the attached page.  More details on how to utilize CORESTAFF,s
Managed Services program will be announced soon and meetings will be
scheduled to demonstrate the reporting system and to meet the Managed
Services team.

What is Managed Services?

CORESTAFF,s Managed Services program includes:

? Vendor-neutral management model
? Equal distribution of staffing orders to all staffing partners
? Web-based application with online ordering, data capture and customized
reporting
? Benchmarking and performance measurement for continuous improvement
? Methodologies for accurate skill-matching and fulfillment efficiencies

Key Benefits

? More vendors working on each order from the outset ) faster access to
available talent pools
? Standardized mark-ups and fees to manage costs more effectively
? Online access to requisition status for users
? Robust databases offering managers enhanced tracking and reporting of
temporary usage and expenditures
? Standard and customized reporting capabilities -- online
? Tenured, experienced Managed Services team on-site to assist users in
accessing web site, identifying usage trends, preparing specialized reports,
etc.

Corestaff/Managed Services/Staffing

Joseph Marsh ) Lead / Operations (josephm@corestaff.com; 713-438-1400)
Amy Binney, Sharon B. Sellers ) Operations
Cherri Carbonara ) Marketing / Communications
Cynthia Duhon )Staffing Partner management


Some additional background on the California refund issue.  Consistent with what we discussed; just some additional detail.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alvarez, Ray
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:27 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; McVicker, Maureen
Subject:	CA Refund Case Information; PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL

Steve,

Jim Steffes called me to inquire as to the information you are interested in, regarding the California refund case, and I passed the following along to him by phone:

Status of the refund claim:

The CAISO refund claims made in CAISO letters to Congress, and the final claim at the FERC-ordered settlement conference, were approximately $38 MM.  The initial claim in the California Refund case before Judge Birchman was very similar, although the most recent CAISO claim is that they owe us $1MM!  A review of their claim revealed errors.  I asked Charles River Associates to re-run the numbers correcting only the errors and they came up with a $57MM figure.  Please note that this number resulted from an internal exercise and is not a claim by the ISO.  However, I consider this the maximum exposure from what is known at this time.  I expect that CAISO will revise its claim against us around December 7, and I will communicate the new claim as soon as I receive it.

Points summarizing the proceeding:

The California refund proceeding at FERC, unlike the Pacific Northwest proceeding, contemplates that refunds will be paid and orders the Judge to determine the amount of the refunds.
Issues to be decided by the Judge include (1) the amounts of the mitigated market claiming price (2) the amounts owed by each seller and (3) the amount that a seller may offset against its refund obligation.
This proceeding has been delayed due to errors and omissions in the California ISO's data.
Due to deficiencies in the data, it is also difficult to assess potential exposure. The California ISO's claims have thus far been erroneous.
Hearings are scheduled to occur on December 17-21 and February 11-15. The Judge's ruling is expected on March 8, 2002.

Timing of the FERC Order:
It is difficult to say how quickly the Commission may rule after receiving the Judge's certification of findings and record on March 8.  Arguably, they could act very quickly due to the limited scope of the proceeding and the fact that the Judge's findings will likely be limited to the three issues described above.

Let me know if you need any more information.  I will copy you on significant memos in the case.  Regards,  Ray


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Exchange Information <Marketing@NYMEX.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:49 AM
To:	Exchange Information
Subject:	(01-367) EFP Filing Deadlines

Notice  No. 01-367
November 1, 2001

TO:		All NYMEX Division Members
		All NYMEX Commodity Managers
		All NYMEX Clearing Members

FROM:	J. Robert Collins, Jr., President

RE:		EFP Filing Deadlines

	Effective immediately, all EFP submission deadlines will return to
their pre-September 11, 2001 standard timing.  For example, the day after
expiration EFP deadlines for the now-expired November 2001 Heating Oil,
Unleaded Gasoline and Propane contracts is 2:00 p.m. today, Thursday,
November 1, 2001.  Generally, all other EFPs must be submitted by the close
of each futures market on a daily basis.

Further, Notices of Intention to Deliver and Accept to be submitted by
clearing members related to the aforementioned November 2001 contracts are
due at the clearinghouse at 3:00 p.m. today.

		If you have any questions, please call Thomas LaSala, Vice
President, Compliance, at (212) 299-2897.


Steve - attached is a new chart that paints a clearer picture of the existing
generation emissions v. new generation emissions.  Some of the units are
fairly inefficient ('though some of these units are currently in the process
of "repowering" to increase their efficiency) which increases their effective
emissions.

(see Chart 1)

In thinking more about the discrepancies in emissions b/w existing and new
generation, it really amounts to a fundamental flaw in the rules for
nonattainment areas in the Clean Air Act.  These rules have no provisions for
growth and create a pretty strong competitive advantage for existing sources
of emissions.  Basically, any new sources in nonattainment areas have to go
to existing sources and convince them to reduce their emissions.  In CA's
case - since they have been nonattainment for so many years many of the
sources of emission reductions have already been tapped.  In other
nonattainment areas like Houston and Atlanta - the nonattainment geographic
boundaries are so small that there are only a handful of significant
stationary sources of emissions.

I don't think CA is going to be able to effect a lot of change on their own.
It is going to take a Federal legislative fix.

Let me know what other information you need.

Mary Schoen
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-345-7422


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043002.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Please incorporate these changes into the 2000 plan.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/13/2000 10:17 AM
---------------------------

	Peggy Hedstrom
	04/13/2000 08:48 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 2000 Audit

For the Management contacts for Canada, please make the following changes:

 Add: Peggy Hedstrom
  Rob Milnthorp
  Jon McKay

 Delete: John Lavorato

If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Thanks,
Peggy


Energy

Argus

  _____

To find out more email:
rlippock@energyargus.com <mailto:rlippock@energyargus.com>

or telephone:
202-775-0240 ext 304
Power Plants Outages:
Real-time Update service and database!

A Must have for ANY Energy professional!
  _____

Dear Shelley Corman

Energy Argus' Power Plant Outages service now comes complete with real-time updates, sent to you immediately via instant messenger. Now, not only do you get to search and query the Argus site of plants information, including:

Nuclear units;
Fossil-fired units;
New generation;
Existing capacity;

You now also get instant updates sent by messenger to you - on the platform of your choice - so can act on the news virtually as it happens.

Who need this information - and why?

Analysts and traders need this information: Many of the new proposed plants that were expected to come on line are being cancelled or delayed - meaning that supply will tighten and operating costs will narrow. Each plant outage now has a more severe effect - spiking prices and decreasing supply.

Energy Argus' Power Outages updates give you instant notice of these outages so you can prepare immediately and determine ramifacations on power and fuel prices.

Power industry vendors: Outages mean opportunities - immediate notification means you get your foot in the door first.

WANT MORE INFORMATION?

Just fill out the form below and we'll send information to you immediately!

Please complete the following information, bold is a required field

First Name:
Last Name:
Title:
Company Name:
Address:

City:
State/Province:
Postal Code:
Country:
Telephone:
Fax:
Email Address:
Instant Messenger Address:

  _____

Main Business
Power
Coal
Air Regulatory
Transportation
Other:
	 Interests
Market Commentary
Market Prices
Market Analysis
News
Other:

I am not a subscriber to Energy Argus products.
I am a subscriber to Energy Argus products.

If you have finished filling in your details please press SUBMIT REQUEST
If you would like to start over please press CLEAR

Note: Please make sure the fields in RED are completed, if you receive an error message after submission, then select from your browser toolbar to return to the form.

If you would rather not receive Argus promotions please click here. <http://www.listmgr.net/remove.cgi?jobno=44735856&xqn=15247>

Energy Argus
1700 K Street NW
Suite 1202
Washington DC 20006
Tel: 202-775-0240
Fax: 202-872-8045
rlippock@energyargus.com <mailto:rlippock@energyargus.com>
http://www.energyargus.com/ <http://207.49.16.150/ct.cgi?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.energyargus.com%2f&appno=467&mrn=44735856&xqn=15247&url_no=2>

  <http://207.49.16.150/cg.cgi?appno=467&mrn=44735856&xqn=15247>


Fed # 6187

Cathy


**Clarification**

Harassment Prevention Training

This training is mandatory for all Enron employees employed since the last
seminar was conducted  in late 1998 or early 1999.  Those who have already
attended Enron harassment avoidance training will be offered a refresher
course in avoiding and preventing harassment.

To contribute our personal best at ENRON, our conduct must promote respectful
and co-operative work relationships. Workplace harassment conflicts with
ENRON's vision and values and violates Company policy.  Harassment also can
violate federal and state laws.  By understanding what harassment is and its
potential harm, we can prevent it in our workplace.

During this training you will:

 Be able to recognize harassment
 Learn to take precautions against being harassed
 Learn to avoid being considered a harasser
 Know how to address a situation involving harassment
 Learn how harassment prevention is consistent with ENRON values

Please click here (  )  to sign up for the session of your choice.    If you
have problems registering or have any questions, please call 713 853-0357.

We are pleased to announce that all employees of EWS and EES will receive
harassment prevention training.

The dates and times available for the sessions are:

 Friday, Feb 23; 1:00 - 2:30; 2:45 - 4:15
  Monday Mar 5; 1:00 - 2:30; 2:45 - 4:15; 4:30 - 6:00

All training sessions will be held in the LaSalle Room at the DoubleTree
Hotel.
There is a $50 charge for each attendee in the training session.