Look at the last article .... any idea what the "rude awakening" might be?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/22/2000 07:30 PM -----

	Ann M Schmidt
	10/20/2000 07:58 AM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric
Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Mentions

Business/Financial Desk; Section C
Study Finds That Many Large Companies Pay No Taxes
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
?
10/20/2000
The New York Times
Page 2, Column 1
c. 2000 New York Times Company
Goodyear, Texaco, Colgate-Palmolive, MCI WorldCom and eight other large
corporations earned more than $12.2 billion in profits in 1996 through 1998,
but none of them ended up owing corporate income taxes over that period,
according to a study released yesterday. Indeed, as a group, the companies
received $535 million in credits or refunds, the report found.
The study of 250 large publicly traded companies showed that 24 owed no tax
or received credits against past or future tax obligations in 1998, up from
13 in 1997 and 16 in 1996. The study also found that 71 of the 250 companies
paid taxes at less than half the official 35 percent corporate rate during
the three-year period.
The study was conducted by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a
Washington research organization associated with Citizens for Tax Justice, a
nonprofit group supported in part by labor unions. The group argues that the
tax system favors the rich and politically connected.
Corporate profits overall soared 23.5 percent during the three-year period,
but corporate tax revenues grew just 7.7 percent, a disjunction that has
drawn intense interest from the Treasury Department and some members of
Congress who are concerned about the growing market for tax shelters and
their abuse.
In recent years, Congress has watered down the 1986 overhaul of the tax laws,
which lowered rates and eliminated most tax shelters, and was supposed to
simplify reporting. The recent changes have opened fresh opportunities for
corporations to cut their taxes, the study found.
''Corporate taxes are not rising along with profits because companies have
found all sorts of ways to get around the reforms in the 1986 tax act,'' said
Robert S. McIntyre, the director of Citizens for Tax Justice. ''Companies
also have gotten a lot of help from Congress, especially in gutting the
minimum tax rules.''
Mr. McIntyre said that he and T. D. Coo Nguyen, the co-author, spent more
than two years examining financial statements the companies sent to
shareholders.
All but 18 of the companies studied are on the Fortune 500 list, and the
others are in the Fortune 1000. He said companies were excluded if they lost
money or their tax disclosures ''were crafted so that you could not figure
them out.''
At least two companies objected to the study's methodology.
Keith Price, a spokesman for Goodyear, said the study did not appear to
consider an accounting rule affecting its sale of a pipeline subsidiary in
1998. It made no objection to the 1996 and 1997 figures.
Michael N. Ambler, Texaco's chief tax counsel, said that his company had tax
disputes with the Internal Revenue Service that were unresolved after more
than a decade. If those disputes are settled with a refund, he said, that can
easily distort the figures for any one year. He said that even the three-year
study period was too short to give an accurate picture.
Timothy McCormally of the Tax Executives Institute, which represents
officials at large companies, told Bloomberg News that the companies named in
the report did nothing wrong. ''There is nothing in the report that suggests
that any of this results from any illegal or improper activity,'' he said.
The study by the Washington institute showed that the corporate tax burden
was falling in many cases because of the growing use of stock options, which
are an expense for tax purposes but do not count against profits reported to
shareholders.
Recent annual reports filed by Microsoft and Cisco Systems indicate that they
paid no federal income taxes in 1999 because stock options exercised by
employees wiped out profits for tax purposes.
The study found that General Electric, I.B.M., Pfizer, Intel and
Bristol-Myers Squibb also sharply reduced their tax rates because of stock
options without having to show reduced earnings to shareholders.
The most significant factor in the easing corporate tax burden, Mr. McIntyre
said, can be traced to actions in Congress, which relaxed the corporate
minimum tax in 1993 when the Democrats were in control of both the House and
Senate, and again in 1997, after the Republicans had taken over. Congress
made it easier for corporations to spread tax breaks and profits over many
years, including reaching back to past years to get tax breaks that could not
be used at the time.
In at least one of the three years studied, 41 of the 250 large companies
studied paid no federal income tax. Those 41 companies reported $25.8 billion
in profits to shareholders in the years they paid no taxes. If they had been
obligated to pay the full 35 percent corporate rate, the tax bill would have
been $9 billion, but the companies received $3.2 billion in refunds.
In total dollars, General Electric was the biggest beneficiary of tax breaks,
the study said, saving $6.9 billion in three years. The company paid $2.1
billion in income taxes on $25.8 billion in profits, for a tax rate of 8.1
percent.
The highest tax rate for the three years was paid by Winn-Dixie Stores, which
paid an average of 35.7 percent of its 1996 through 1998 profits in federal
income taxes. It was one of two companies that paid more than the 35 percent
statutory rate because of multiyear tax rules. The other was Paccar.

Chart: ''Profits Without Pain'' In a study of 250 large and profitable
companies, these 17 paid the least in corporate taxes -- or got the biggest
refunds -- as a percentage of profits from 1996 to 1998. Goodyear 1996-98
PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: $657 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS:
-$ 65 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -9.9 Texaco 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 3,447
TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 304 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE:
-8.8 Ryder 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 489 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID,
1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 30 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -6.2 El Paso Energy 1996-98
PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 818 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: -
36 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -4.4 MedPartners 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 184
TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 4 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE:
-2.1 Tenneco 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 731 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID,
1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 14 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -1.9 Colgate-Palmolive 1996-98
PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 777 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: -
14 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -1.7 MCI WorldCom 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 3,578
TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 61 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE:
-1.7 Corporate Express* 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 214 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED
OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 4 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -1.6 WestPoint Stevens
1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 339 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN
MILLIONS: - 3 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: -0.7 Kmart 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS:
978 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: - 2 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE:
-0.2 Enron 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 816 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID,
1996-98, IN MILLIONS: + 2 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: +0.2 Transamerica 1996-98
PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 2,199 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS:
+ 5 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: +0.2 Suiza Foods 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 295
TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: + 2 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE:
+0.8 Navistar 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 742 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID,
1996-98, IN MILLIONS: + 13 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: +1.8 McKesson 1996-98 PROFITS,
IN MILLIONS: 473 TOTAL TAX REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: + 10
EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: +2.1 Pfizer 1996-98 PROFITS, IN MILLIONS: 3,367 TOTAL TAX
REFUNDED OR PAID, 1996-98, IN MILLIONS: + 104 EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: +3.1
*Purchased by Buhrmann in October 1999. (Source: Institute on Taxation and
Economic Policy)

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Business; Financial Desk
Legal Breaks Lower Some Corporate Tax Rates
?
10/20/2000
Los Angeles Times
Home Edition
Page C-3
Copyright 2000 / The Times Mirror Company
WASHINGTON -- Dozens of America's most profitable companies enjoyed tax-free
years during the 1990s largely because of legal tax breaks, an independent
study released Thursday found.
The report by the nonprofit Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found
that 250 companies paid an effective tax rate of 20.1% in 1998, down from
22.9% just two years before. The federal income tax rate for corporations is
supposed to be 35%.
Of the 250 companies studied, 41 enjoyed at least one year of no income taxes
or an actual rebate from the federal government, despite pretax profits of
$25.8 billion from 1996 to 1998.
If all 250 companies had paid the full 35% on $735 billion in pretax profits,
the study estimated the total income tax would have come to $257 billion. But
tax breaks put into law by Congress lowered those companies' tax bills by $98
billion over the three-year period.
Companies getting tax rebates in 1998 alone included Texaco Inc., Chevron
Corp., PepsiCo Inc., J.P. Morgan & Co., Enron Corp. and General Motors Corp.,
the report found.
The study's chief author, Robert S. McIntyre, said companies lower their
taxes through such breaks as depreciation write-offs, tax credits for
research and development and deductions they take when employees exercise
stock options.
The report also found that the petroleum industry paid the lowest tax rate
from 1996 to 1998, at 12.3%, followed by electronics at 13.1%, forest and
paper products at 13.9% and transportation at 14%. At the other end of the
spectrum, publishing and printing companies paid 31.6%, gas and electric
utilities paid 28.1% and retail and wholesale trade companies paid 27.6%.

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Oct. 19, 2000, 10:23PM
Houston Chronicle
Arena boosters tout 3 benefits
Some question property/sales tax numbers, new development
By ERIC BERGER
Copyright 2000 Houston Chronicle
Enron Field sparked the redevelopment of downtown's east side, boosters say,
and an arena would crown the revitalization of the long-neglected area.
A strongly pro-arena business organization, Central Houston Inc., released a
flurry of positive economic numbers to back its contention that Enron Field
is a boon to downtown as well as to city, county and school tax coffers, and
that the arena would be as well.
"There's no better way to measure the impact of sports facilities on downtown
than to look at the one we already have," said the organization's president,
Bob Eury, as he crooked a finger toward the ballpark.
Eury and other boosters outlined three economic benefits to Houston they say
are related to sports facilities: increased property tax revenues, a wealth
of new development in the area and a boost in sales tax collected.
But economic analysts questioned some of their conclusions.
When Enron Field was built, nine blocks were taken off the tax rolls at a
cost of about $284,000 in lost property taxes.
Eury said, though, that it was not a bad trade.
He noted that properties around the ballpark have leaped in value since the
Enron Field project began in the mid-1990s. In turn, the annual property tax
collected on land and buildings within four blocks of the ballpark is $2.4
million greater now than in 1995.
But Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector Paul Bettencourt said those figures
are due in part to the boom in land values across downtown, including the
central business district, since 1995.
Bettencourt said he hoped to have an analysis finished today to determine
whether land values around Enron Field had increased at a greater rate than
land in the rest of downtown.
The boosters also highlighted more than $700 million worth of private
developments planned -- but not yet completed -- near the ballpark, including
the $90 million, 37-story Ballpark Place Tower across Crawford Street from
Enron Field.
"Without a doubt, if Enron Field was not there, Ballpark Place would not be
there," said John Holland, an executive vice president for the Trammel Crow
Co., which expects to break ground on the project in early 2001.
Because the arena would be built in an urban core, even academics who are
skeptical about the economic benefits of sports stadiums agreed that spin-off
development is likely nearby.
But independent economists who have studied such issues, including Brad
Humphreys, an assistant professor at the University of Maryland-Baltimore
County, say development near a stadium usually has a negative impact on
development and businesses in other parts of a city.
The focus must be on the entire market, Humphreys said, not just in the
vicinity of a sports facility.
"Public subsidization of stadiums and arenas isn't necessarily a bad thing,"
he said. "But when they sell them as economic engines, it's just absolutely
wrong. The research doesn't show that."
A recent study Humphreys co-authored, which appeared in the fall 1999 issue
of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, found that the presence of
professional sports teams in a market, on average, actually reduced the
per-capita income in those markets, compared with similar markets without
such teams.
Given Houston's strong economy, Eury said he does not believe downtown
development will detract from other areas of the city, as Humphreys' studies
have shown in other markets.
A third major economic benefit offered Thursday was that a new arena, with
the Houston Rockets and Houston Comets as tenants, would generate $13 million
a year in sales tax revenues.
About $2.7 million of that would go into local coffers, with the remainder
going to the state, according to the study performed for Eury's group by CSL
International, a consulting firm.
Yet even in the absence of a new arena and both teams, many economists say a
large portion of those expenditures would be spent in the area anyway. That
is known as a "substitution effect."
Instead of a family going to a game, it might go to the movies or local zoo.
And corporations are likely to sponsor other local events out of their
advertising budgets, the economists say.
The CSL study did not account for this substitution effect in calculating the
sales tax impact, said Bill Rhoda, the firm's director.

Study: Dozens of corporations pay little or no income tax
By CURT ANDERSON
AP Tax Writer

10/19/2000
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2000. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

WASHINGTON (AP) - Dozens of America's most profitable companies enjoyed
tax-free years during the 1990s largely because of legal tax breaks, an
independent study released Thursday found.
The report by the nonprofit Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found
that 250 companies paid an effective tax rate of 20.1 percent in 1998, down
from 22.9 percent just two years before. The federal income tax rate for
corporations is supposed to be 35 percent.
Of the 250 companies studied, 41 enjoyed at least one year of no income taxes
or an actual rebate from the federal government, despite pretax profits of
$25.8 billion from 1996-98.
If all 250 companies had paid the full 35 percent on $735 billion in pretax
profits, the study estimated the total income tax would have come to $257
billion. But tax breaks put into law by Congress lowered those companies' tax
bills by $98 billion over the three-year period.
Companies getting tax rebates in 1998 alone included Texaco, Chevron,
Pepsico, J.P. Morgan, Enron and General Motors, the report found.
The study's chief author, Robert S. McIntyre, said companies lower their
taxes through such breaks as depreciation write-offs, tax credits for
research and development and deductions they take when employees exercise
stock options.
"We hope our findings will encourage lawmakers to re-examine this important
area of taxation," McIntyre said.
The report also found that the petroleum industry paid the lowest tax rate
from 1996-98, at 12.3 percent, followed by electronics at 13.1 percent,
forest and paper products at 13.9 percent and transportation at 14 percent.
At the other end of the spectrum, publishing and printing companies paid 31.6
percent, gas and electric utilities paid 28.1 percent and retail and
wholesale trade companies paid 27.6 percent.
"Anyone who worries about our economy's long-term growth has to wonder why
the tax code is being used to favor some industries and some kinds of
investments over others, rather than letting market forces decide," McIntyre
said.
----
On the Net:
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy site: http://www.itepnet.org

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

US Rep Drafts Bill To Impose Windfall Tax On Pwr Companies.
By JASON LEOPOLD

10/19/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- California's summer of soaring wholesale
electricity prices helped boost the stock price of many energy companies in
the third quarter.
But if U.S. Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., gets his way, those companies will be
forced to pay back hundreds of millions of dollars in profit to utilities,
customers and the government.
Filner introduced a bill in the House of Representatives last week that would
impose a windfall profit tax on wholesale power sold throughout the western
U.S.
The bill, which was referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means, may be
discussed in December or January, according to Filner, and if he gets enough
support by the mostly Republican caucus, companies like Enron Corp. (ENE),
Duke Energy North America (DUK), Southern Co. (SO). Reliant Energy (REI) and
Dynegy (DYN), would only be allowed to show a certain amount of profit and
anything over that amount would be taxed 100%.
Filner said the amount of profit hasn't been determined but his bill calls
for a baseline that would be a "just and reasonable" amount of profit.
The congressman's San Diego constituents were paying market-based electricity
rates in the summer which resulted in triple-digit utility bills. He said
generators are gouging California customers and need to be held responsible.
"This is not just a problem of supply and demand," Filner told Dow Jones
Newswires. "This is stealing. And we want our money back."
State and federal regulators are conducting separate investigations into
California's wholesale power crisis. The findings, expected to be complete in
about two weeks, are aimed at determining if generators or other key players
manipulated the state's wholesale energy market.
At least two major energy companies are being investigated by California
Attorney General Bill Lockyer. A high level source working on the probe with
the Attorney General said third-quarter earnings statements will play a major
role in finding out if generators manipulated the market.
Their investigation isn't turning up much evidence but earnings statements
are showing that profits are up significantly largely due to wholesale prices
in California, the source said.
At least one Federal Energy Regulatory Commissioner, who spoke on the
condition of anonymity, said the wholesale electricity market in California
will be in for a "rude awakening" when the agency completes its
investigation.
"There will be some serious structural changes to the market," the
commissioner said.
Representatives from energy companies told Dow Jones Newswires that higher
profits weren't the result of illegal activity or manipulating the market.
Energy Cos. Say Summer Crisis Boosted 3Q Earnings
On Wednesday, Duke Energy, which owns and operates power plants in
California, said in an earnings statement that third-quarter profit rose 74%,
due in part, to high wholesale prices in California in the summer. Enron and
several other companies reported similar third-quarter increases based on
California's summer of skyrocketing power prices.
The congressman doesn't want to limit the proposed windfall tax to
California, but where generators sell power in the western U.S.
But even Filner admits that forcing generators to refund part of their
profits isn't getting the early support it needs to become law.
"If the democrats were in charge I'd have this bill voted on already," Filner
said.
Filner said if the bill is passed some of the money would be refunded to
consumers and utilities, the victims, as he refers to them.
Meanwhile, he's also working on getting the House to pass a separate bill to
roll back electricity rates in the western U.S. to pre-deregulation levels
and he's trying to gather support for a wind power initiative.
Regardless of the outcome, the congressman is dead set on making noise.
"If nothing happens, I'm thinking about holding a press conference with the
San Diego District Attorney," he said. "We'll press criminal charges against
the energy companies." -By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Jim:  I want to put Aronowitz for ENA as well as EGM.  He will get an assist from Sager but he will lead.  Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fallon, Jim
Sent:	Sunday, December 09, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Hickerson, Gary; Malcolm, Rodney; Delainey, David W.; Hughes, James A.; Dimichele, Rich; Haedicke, Mark E.; Colwell, Wes; Causey, Richard; Oxley, David; Beck, Sally; Piper, Greg; Buy, Rick; Bradford, William S.; Leff, Dan; Murphy, Ted; Fallon, Jim
Cc:	McMahon, Jeffrey; Whalley, Greg
Subject:	Post Petition Organization

All,

We had a preliminary meeting on Friday.  The attached is a summary of the matrix we developed as well as changes from subsequent e-mails.  Note, only one name has been placed in the matrix where two may have been suggested - if the name is not correct then please e-mail me back as soon as possible - only person per box please.  The names placed in the matrix will be directly responsible to the estate.

We need to meet Monday to: (1) agree on the matrix; (2) develop detailed processes for capturing value (trade books, structured deals, hard assets and business sales); (3) understand the approval process required on a go forward basis; (4) develop compensation / retention program for estate, (5) address any administrative concerns.

If you have not done so, please check the names in the matrix to ensure that they are correct and please send me any changes as well as their full names to be utilized for future e-mails.

Regards,

Jim

 << File: REORG1.doc >>


Russ,

I recieved the following message from Phillip in which you requested our
physical book org codes and what Tagg book name it is associated with.  Below
is a list for the central desk.  If you need any other info let me know.

TAGG BOOK    ORG REGION CODE
FT-INT-CEN-MID  CENTMIDSTH
FT-INT-CEN-MID2  CENTMIDNTH
FT-INT-CEN-MKT  CENTMKTMIC
FT-INT-CEN-MKT2  CENTMKTCG
FT-INTRA-GULF  CENTRAGULF
FT-INTRA-GULF2  CEGULFNGPL
FT-INTRA-ONT   ONTARIO
IM-SITHE   SITHE
FT-INT-CNT-TRAN  CENTRLTRSP
FT-PEOPLES   PEOPLES

Phillip M Love
01/25/2001 03:08 PM
To: Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TDS Physical Positions

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
03:06 PM ---------------------------

Russ Severson
01/25/2001 02:55 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TDS Physical Positions

In order for the physical desks to roll out positions into TDS,  a mapping is
required between the Org region code used in Portcalc
for the physical calc and the related Tagg book code that is used for that
region.

An example would be similar to:

Org Region Code                             Tagg Book Code
CENTRAGULF
FT-INTRA-GULF                        This is just an example and might not be
a valid grouping

 TDS knows the Tagg books to pick up, it just does not know which physical
region codes that are related to it.

Can you provide for your desk all Org Region Codes used on your desk, and
what Tagg Book it would relate to.
If you could send me the list, I will forward them to the TDS developers.

Any questions or concerns, please call me.

Thanks
Russ
x37386


Do you want to print, sign and fax, or shall I take to Janet or someone else
to sign?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/08/2001 03:37
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/08/2001 03:30:43 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Ltr to SEL enclosing Facility Agreements

 <<2TCV01!.DOC>>
Kay:

Per your request, enclosed is a proposed letter to SEL enclosing the final
facility agreements.  I have included a "receipt acknowledged" signature in
the proposed letter, although I believe this is optional as long as our
courier, upon delivery, obtains a signature acknowledging receipt.  Please
advise of any comments.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 131359v1

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2TCV01!.DOC


got it


Sorry for the inconvenience.  Ozzie had to leave town, and he wanted to
participate in the first meeting. I'm sure we will get something worked out.

Kay

"Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com> on 09/19/2000 08:57:36 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT

Kay--as indicated in my voicemail, I will definitely be out of pocket on
Wednesday.  The meeting is supposed to go into Thursday and I fly back Thurs
eve, but it is possible that it would finish up early enough on Thursday that
I could schedule a call for Thursday afternoon.  I'll call you later.

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 09/18/00 07:45PM >>>

Due to a last minute conflict, we need to reschedule this meeting.  How
does everybody look for Wednesday?

Sorry for any inconvenience.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/18/2000 03:25 PM

To:   Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron,
      Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather
      Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
      nwodka@bracepatt.com
cc:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject:  VEPCO INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT

The meeting regarding the above-referenced subject will be held tomorrow,
September 19, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. in 20C2.  Refreshments will be served.

Nancy, Kay, et al. will call you in the morning.


Debra,

I noticed on one of the Deal #'s listed below, Deal # 231047,  is under the
counterparty Duke Energy Field Services, Inc. I was wondering if that Deal #
is a type-o or if it should stand as is, since the subject is dealing with
Tristar Gas Marketing Company I would think it should be different than what
is listed? Please let me know.

Thanks,
Corey

	From:  Debra Perlingiere @ ECT                           04/12/2000 02:40 PM

To: Corey Hobbs/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Tristar Gas Marketing Company

Please send me copies of the following transactions for this enitity:

Deal  Term
208308    3/00-10/00
230882    4/00
231684    5/00-7/00
231047   4/00
214232  6/00-10/00
220887  5/00-7/00

Thanks

DP


Hi fellow Haas students, faculty, staff:

I thought I might throw in an invitation for a short-but-sweet dive trip
down south over memorial day if you haven't any plans yet.  Through
Redwoods@Haas, this May dive trip will be a 5-day, 4-night all inclusive
trip open to divers and non-divers.  The objective is simply to "decompress"
after the semester: you can dive, hike/explore, lay out, read, or simply do
nothing for a long weekend.

More details to follow - and can be accessed through the Redwoods@Haas
alias, so sign up to the alias if you are interested.-jim

Haas Diving Trip to Cozumel!

May 25-30, 2001

Trip includes:

1)  5 days, 4 nights accommodations, double occupancy
2)  Roundtrip airfare from LAX
3)  R/T transfers airport/hotel in Cozumel
4)  4 days of 2-tank boat dives
5)  Unlimited tanks for shore diving on boat diving days
6)  Free use of full range of Mares Equipment
7)  Free single tank night boat dive (lights not included)
8)  Free u/w video of you diving in Cozumel
9)  Includes use of Tanks, weights; also includes taxes, service charges

Total cost:  $990.00 per person ($200 less if not diving)

Hotel:  Plaza Las Glorias Hotel - right on the water, has about the largest
rooms in any hotel in Cozumel, walking distance of San Miguel, the only town
in Cozumel.  The diving outfit will pick up and drop off the divers from the
Hotel on the dive days. (check out website to get a good idea on what the
hotel looks like!
http://www.cozumel.travelnotes.cc/hotels/plazalasglorias.html

Other info: 1)  For days that you don't want to dive, there are
opportunities to go visit the Mayan ruins, museums, beaches, visits
to the mainland by ferry.  I will get more information as questions arise.

2)  Up to 10 divers per boat, but 8 is ideal.

3)  Budget for food will be around $25 a day

4)  Free equipment includes Masks, Snorkels, BCDs, Fins,
Wetsuits. (but I recommend bringing your own)

5)  2-tank boat dives depart hotel around 0800 and return
1300.  Surface interval will be lunch on a beach somewhere

6)  Depart LAX on May 25 at 7:00 am, change planes in Mexico
city and
arrive Cozumel at 3:20 pm. Depart Cozumel on May 30 at 2:35
pm, change
planes in Cancun and arrive LAX at 9:20 pm

7)  We could probably set up a diving certification for
those interested in getting certified - you'll take lessons here,
and finish off your certification dives in Cozumel!

What to do:

Give a non-refundable deposit of $150.00 by April 10, 2001 to hold your
place.  Payment may be made by Credit Card directly to the travel company I
am working with.  Contact Jim Abilla @ abilla@haas.berkeley.edu for details.

Hope you can come! - jim


Yes, the producer receives a fixed price, however, these deals are probably
in TAGG as Nymex plus basis deals.  Phillips deal was transferred to ENA,
Power Gas was triggered on ENA books.
Or does it matter???

Chris Germany@ECT
06/21/2000 08:42 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Peoples

So both of these suppliers are now fixed price because  they locked in the
NYMX?


Dear Valued Customer,
******************************
Get 10 Commission-FREE trades!
******************************
Deposit a check for $10,000 or more into an
existing account before August 1, 2001 and get
10 commission-free Internet equity trades. For
the required special deposit slip and more
information, log on at:http://www.ameritrade.com and visit the Customer Benefits page.
**Quarterly Maintenance Fee**
Effective May 25, 2001 a $15 quarterly account
maintenance fee* may be assessed to your
account if you have less than $2,000 in total
liquidation value.
Your account will be excluded from this fee if:
- it is a beneficiary account or an IRA
- it has been open less than six months
- you have had at least four executed trades in
  the account in the last six months
Fees will assessed on the following days
for this calendar year:
May 25, August 31 and November 30, 2001
**Paper Trade Confirmation Fee**
Effective July 1, 2001, a $2 fee* will be
assessed to your account for each trade
confirmation sent via U.S. Mail.
AVOID THIS FEE by signing up for our FREE
Electronic Trade Confirmations service.**
Log on at:http://www.ameritrade.com and click on the Electronic Trade Confirmations
link located on the myAccount tab to sign up
now.
**Updated Privacy Statement**
Protecting your privacy and safeguarding your
personal and financial information is one of
our highest priorities. To learn how we gather,
use and protect your personal information,
review the Ameritrade Privacy Statement at:http://www.ameritrade.com/tell_me_more/privacy_ policy.fhtml
Sincerely,
J. Peter Ricketts
President
Ameritrade, Inc.
*These fees will be automatically deducted from
your account and will appear on your account
statement.
**If you currently receive E-mail Trade
Confirmations you will automatically be
enrolled in this new delivery service.
Ameritrade understands the importance of
protecting your privacy.  If you do not wish to
receive news about new and valuable Ameritrade
services in the future, please hit your "reply"
button, type "unsubscribe" in the subject line,
and send the note.
We'll gladly exclude you from future marketing
messages.
Member SIPC.  Ameritrade is a registered
service mark of Ameritrade Holding Corporation.
Copyright ? 2001 Ameritrade, Inc. All rights
reserved.
ATI 633 E-M 05/01
[IMAGE]


Rich,

Thank you for keeping us in the loop on this unit.  Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Jolly, Rich
Sent:	Wed 8/22/2001 4:07 PM
To:	Lowry, Phil
Cc:	Harris, Steven; Rice, Randy; Stephens, LD; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Watson, Kimberly; Smith, Rick; Roensch, David; McCracken, Mike; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Keller, John R.; Maestas, Gary; Gallup, Team; Gallup-Sta5, Team; Gallup-Sta4, Team
Subject:	Re: Gallup Compressor

	Phil I just got off the phone with Arnold and we have been advised that in the morning around 5 o'clock eastern time is the earliest that Alstrom will have information for us. From talking with Arnold, Alstrom has to get permission from England before they can give us approval to pull the unit. Since the unit is still under warranty we'll need to wait on directions from Alstrom. The team is doing more testing with Alstrom during this time to try and figure out how much damage the unit has.

	We do have Norm Spalding's group lining up a contractor to assist in pulling the unit and transporting it for us. I'll keep everyone undated as soon as we get more information.

	Thanks
	Rich

	Rich Jolly
	08/22/2001 04:38 AM
	To:	Steven Harris/Enron@EnronXGate, Phil Lowry/Enron@EnronXGate, Randy Rice/Enron@EnronXGate
	cc:	LD Stephens/Enron@EnronXGate, Darrell Schoolcraft/Enron@EnronXGate, Kimberly Watson/Enron@EnronXGate, Rick Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

	Subject:	Gallup Compressor

	Steve here's where we are on the Gallup Compressor. Part of the stator is damaged and we're not sure if it can be repaired in place at this time. This will be decided sometime this morning and I'll let you know. If the stator cannot be repaired in place it will have to be pulled and returned to the factory. If this happens we'll be down for (I'm guessing on this) but from past experience it will be two weeks or more. I'll be at the Gallup site this morning.

	Thanks
	Rich


John,
In regard to our previous discussions regarding the floating tariff and
related swap for the offshore floating production system financing, we are
now in the Phase II bidding process for Devil's Tower.  Attached is the
production profile for Devil's Tower.

Can you run your analysis on the 1P volumes (guaranteed, firm volumes) and
advise us of your findings [floating oil and gas tariffs].  I am available to
meet with you today at 2 p.m., 4 p.m. or anytime tomorrow (Friday).  Let me
know what your schedule is like.

Thanks, Lisa Druzbik
3-9620

----- Forwarded by Lisa Druzbik/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000 10:22 AM -----

	Kelli Little
	12/07/2000 09:24 AM

		 To: Lisa Druzbik/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dominion Volumes

Lisa,

I've attached the Dominion and Enron volume curves.  Please let me know if
you have any questions.

Thanks,
Kelli


HI Dutch and Kay

I checked into the shipment of the Leap Frog explorer game that I sent to
you. It was shipped and sent to the P.O. Box.

Here is the history:

Shipment History

You entered: 9101 1273 9179 0014 3234 58

Your item was delivered at 8:41am on October 06, 2001 in
HOUSTON, TX 77277.

 Here is what happened earlier:

 ELECTRONIC SHIPPING INFO RECEIVED,
October 04, 2001, 4:18pm

Is there a way to find out if the post office on your end sent it back
because it was not picked up right away????

Let me know what I should do.

Thanks

ddq

----------
From: Denise Quigley <quigley@rand.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:42:39 -0700
To: quigley@cse.ucla.edu
Subject: confirmation of the order

------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: orders@amazon.com
Return-Path: <orders@amazon.com>
Received: from u2.infonet.com (u2.infonet.com [192.157.130.154]) by
mail.rand.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA13271 for <quigley@rand.org>;
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: orders@amazon.com
Received: (from root@localhost) by u2.infonet.com (8.11.3/8.6.12) id
f94K3nN10177 for quigley@rand.org; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:03:49 GMT
Received: from guzzi.amazon.com (guzzi.amazon.com [209.191.164.151]) by
u2.infonet.com (8.11.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id f94K3mL10066 for
<quigley@rand.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:03:48 GMT
Received: from matchless.amazon.com (matchless.amazon.com [10.16.42.218])
    by guzzi.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD151588
    for <quigley@rand.org>; Thu,  4 Oct 2001 13:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sas-dc-mail-102.amazon.com (sas-dc-mail-102.amazon.com
[10.16.42.155])
    by matchless.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3120342
    for <quigley@rand.org>; Thu,  4 Oct 2001 13:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by sas-dc-mail-102.amazon.com
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:22:01 GMT
Message-Id: <f94JM1U02473.200110041922@sas-dc-mail-102.amazon.com>
To: quigley@rand.org
Subject: Your Amazon.com order (#002-4616541-7100020)
Content-Length: 2579

Greetings from Amazon.com.

We thought you'd like to know that we shipped your items today,
and that this completes your order.

Thanks for shopping at Amazon.com, and we hope to see you again soon.

You can track the status of this order, and all your orders, online by
visiting Your Account at http://www.amazon.com/your-account.
There you can:
        * Track order and shipment status
        * Review estimated delivery dates
        * Cancel unshipped items
        * Return items
        * And do much more

The following items were included in this shipment:
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Qty      Item                           Price  Shipped  Subtotal
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
1        Explorer Globe II              $99.99  1       $99.99
         Sold by Amazon.com Kids, Inc.

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
               Item Subtotal:  $99.99
         Shipping & Handling:  $13.09
                       Total:  $113.08
                Paid by :

- --------------------------------------------------------------------

This shipment was sent to:

    Dutch Quigley
    P.O. Box 270037
    Houston TX 77277

via US Priority (complimentary upgrade) (3-7 business days).

For your reference, the number you can use to track your package is
9101127391790014323458.  You can refer to our Web site's Help page or:

http://www.amazon.com/tracking

to retrieve current tracking information.  Please note that tracking
information may not be available immediately.

Unless otherwise noted, items are sold by Amazon.com LLC and taxed if
shipped to Washington or North Dakota. Please note that your order
contains one or more items from an Amazon.com partner and may be
subject to state and local sales tax, depending on the state to which
the item is being shipped. For more tax and seller information, visit:
http://www.amazon.com/o/sor?o=002-4616541-7100020.

If you've explored the links on the Your Account page but still need
to get in touch with us about your order, you can find an e-mail form
in our Help department at http://www.amazon.com/help.

Please note: This e-mail was sent from a notification-only address
that cannot accept incoming e-mail. Please do not reply to this message.

Thank you for shopping with us.

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Amazon.com
Earth's Biggest Selection
http://www.amazon.com/
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------

------- End of Forwarded Message


FYI

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 03:26 PM -----

	Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson@ENRON
	05/21/2001 12:27 PM

		 To: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment
(increase from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et
al

Stephanie, you may want to clarify all of the facts as well.  That a local
phone number was disconnected is irrelevant because keegan called my cell
phone number and spoke with my fiance.  He and Keegan then called my house in
New York and notified my family that Keegan wanted to reach me.  They
conveyed that message to me immediately as I walked though the door.  I then
immediately called Keegan the minute I walked into my house in New York.

As I mentioned to Sara, if you need to reach me

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/

	Stephanie Panus
	05/21/2001 11:54 AM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment
(increase from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et
al

You may want to clarify this with Keegan as 1) your voice mail was full on
that Friday, 2) Keegan tried to contact you in New York and the number she
had for you was disconnected, and 3) we tried to locate the documents that
Friday and were not able to.

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	05/21/2001 11:00 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment
(increase from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et
al

Sara,

Moreover, Keegan represented to me that you requested that she locate for you
the Securities Loan Agreement for you while I was out and that she went into
my office and retrieved that document from my Enron Credit Inc. file and gave
it to you.  So, I am not sure of the source of confusion about not being able
to find my file but for future reference, the best thing to do is to ask
Keegan how to contact me immediately and directly - when out the office she
always knows how to reach me.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	05/21/2001 10:36 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment
(increase from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et
al

Sara:

I will forward the documents to you.

For future reference, if anyone is looking for a file for an urgent matter
while I am out, she should convey that fact to me by either (1) leaving a
voice mail - as I checked my voicemails on Friday (that is how I was able to
speak with Tom from New York on Friday) or (2) advise Keegan and she will
contact me immediately by cell phone as she did regarding other matters on
Friday.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	05/15/2001 03:45 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tom Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment (increase
from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et al

Cheryl:

I spoke with Clem and he is preparing the amendment for immediate execution
as the signers will be at an offsite tomorrow.  I'll let Tom know as soon as
the amendment has been executed.  Anna Meytina is on vacation so I left a
message with Sharon Chernick.

In order to complete our files with respect to the Enron North America Inc.
("ENA") Securities Loan Agreement, please provide me with copies of the
following documents:

(1)  assignment of the Securities Loan Agreement from ENA to ECI (or was a
separate agreement with ECI executed?)

(2) termination of the prior Enron Corp. guaranty on behalf of ENA in the
amount of  USD25 Million

I spoke with Stephanie and she could not locate your Bear/ECI files on Friday
of last week.

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Ed is the only one I've heard from today.  I've forwarded his questions to
our local counsel in Mississippi for their input insofar as the questions
involve capacity to contract.

You'll be pleased to know that I understood his questions.  I'm so proud.

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/24/2001 01:59 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Contract comments and Master Agreements

Kay,  just thought I'd check to see how things are progressing.  The only one
I have heard from is Ed Sacks.  He has some good issues that I cannot
answer.  I asked him to be available Thursday and think about how he'd like
to see the structure work from a credit perspective.

Have the Master Gas and Power agreements been forwarded to MDEA, et. al.??

Thanks,

Reagan


Mom,

That sounds good.  You can bring the curtains when you come.  What time do
you think you can make it down here on Friday?  We will probably be leaving
farily early to go to the rodeo (about 5:00).  We can have the girl across
thestreet take care of Cole until you get there.

Daren

"pam farmer" <fpam_@hotmail.com> on 02/10/2000 09:54:57 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: curtains

Hey!  The curtains look good--I hope they do when they are hung-- Lacy & I
are planning to come next Friday the 18th. when ya'll go to the rodeo.  I'm
taking a personal day from the bus and leaving early. Thought I would bring
them. Answer & let me know if that's ok.  If you need them before then I'll
try to get them mailed.  Hope sweet Cole is feeling better over his cold.
Love you, Mom
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Some comments from Tim on the outline

Because the prices are based on L3Day NYMEX prices, when two out of three
prices have already been posted, it is impossible for parties to hedge their
risk for November.  [For your information but not for the filing - We have a
big position for November so we need to get this pushed off until December or
we could lose alot of money].
By basing the caps on heat rates from 1999, the ISO assumed that this was the
proper test period.  This is not a good test year given that generators lost
alot of money in 1999.

From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 10/27/2000 11:09 AM CDT
To: dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, dexickson@mwe.com, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Pleading to Stop ISO

Here is the outline of some points to make in the filing today.


Sara,

FYI:	Sue Kelly was the Corporate Secretary based in the UK who handled the maintenance of the the "official minute books" for those group of Enron companies in the UK.

Susan
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:01 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Cc:	Bailey, Susan
Subject:	RE: Enron Credit Inc. Resolution

Tana:

I don't know who Sue Kelly is so you may want to handle that end.  The London lawyers don't need anything further.  Thanks.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:54 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Enron Credit Inc. Resolution

Do I need to fax a copy of this resolution to the London lawyers and Sue Kelly, or have you and Susan taken care of that?


Thanks for the opportunity.  I'm V.P. and General Counsel of Enron
Transportation and Storage, and its operating companies, Northern Natural Gas
Co. and Transwestern Pipeline Co.  I'm stationed in Omaha, Nebraska.  I
practiced law in D.C. for 12 years before FERC and other state and federal
regulatory agencies and the courts.  As for objectives, I'd like to see the
group facilitate dialogue and work toward consistency on regulatory strategy,
as well as serve as a forum for sharing practical "best practices" experience
Enron people have gained around the world.  I look forward to meeting you!
DF

Harry Kingerski@EES
01/04/2000 09:25 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Introduction

Drew - I talked to Mike Moran this morning and he suggested you for
participation in this corporate working group (see below).  Very glad to have
you.  Other group members are from  various parts of Public Affairs, both
U.S. and International.  Mike also said you may want to have Maria Pavlou
participate, which I leave up to you.  The perspective from the pipeline
group will be a great addition to our effort.

Please see the note below and respond at your earliest convenience.  Thanks
very much.

---------------------- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES on 01/04/2000
09:18 AM ---------------------------

Harry Kingerski

12/29/99 11:20 AM
Sent by: Judy Pearson
To: Rates and Tariffs Working Group
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Introduction

One of Steve Kean's newly formed Working Groups is for "Rates & Tariffs".  I
have been asked to lead this group.  For those of you who don't know me, I am
in Houston in the U.S./Canada Government Affairs group, in a section called
"Rates/Regulatory Services."  Our working group will have about a dozen or so
people from various parts of Public Affairs.  You have been
selected/volunteered to participate in this effort by your group leaders.

The Working Group members are:
Ray Alvarez
Sergio Assad
Roy Boston
Mike Grimes
Kyran Hanks
Rita Hartfield
Nancy Hetrick
Tom Hoatson
Paul Kaufman
Valeria Lima
Bob Neustaedter

Having this group will give us a great opportunity to identify needs related
to rate and tariff issues across many business lines and countries, share
resources, problems and solutions, and generally improve the cohesiveness of
Steve's organization   One of our first tasks will be to think through and
concretely specify what we expect to accomplish as a group.   We do not have
a specific product mandate per se - it will be up to us to figure it out and
deliver it.   Some possibilities are - identifying rates and tariffs policy
positions, developing policies where none now exist, but are needed,
identifying rates and tariff resources available to the group, and acquiring
resources needed by the group.

As a preliminary matter, could you e-mail me your group name, position,
location, phone, e-mail address, and "area of expertise".  We will assemble
this information in a roster to be distributed to the group.

Early in January, we will be in touch to check availability and schedule an
initial meeting.  Please be as flexible as possible.  In some cases, we are
many time zones apart and it will be difficult to match everyone's desired
time.

As a second preliminary matter, please give some thought to and e-mail me
what you think a group like this should accomplish.  Remember, the roster
above has some of the world's leading authorities on rates and tariffs!   We
will compile both the complete roster and your ideas on group goals and
distribute them to everybody prior to our first actual meeting.   At that
first meeting, we will talk through expectations of us and of each other, and
the proposed goals.
Please have your inputs to me by January 7.  I look forward to working with
you.


Please find below the GTV project status update for this week. Please see the attached file for the project timeline update in Microsoft Project.

GTV status meeting attendees:  Dave Nommensen, Karima Husain, Francis Lim, Jeremy Wong, Bill Fortney, Nayan Dattani, Russ Severson, Narasim Kasaru, Mike Swaim, Chuck Ames, Geoff Storey, Jay Krish.

Accomplishments:

?	Incorporating physcial deal positions in TDS:
o	Changes to CPR reader process & its unit testing have been completed.
o	Loading prior-day curves into position manager - in test.
o	Changes for the view aggregation - in development (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Single point of deal entry for term deals:
o	Single point of deal entry is now in user testing.

?	Gas Daily deals:
o	Changes to PortCalc application to create GDI calc in ERMS are complete and ready for testing.
o	IT development items are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline).

?	Live feeds for Gas Daily/intra-month curves:
o	Development of live feeds has been completed, tested, user-approved and already in production.

?	Option Grid (phase 2):
o	Conversion from Motif into Powerbuilder has commenced.

?	Gas Daily options:
o	Changes to PortCalc application have been completed and ready for testing.

Completed Inception document and timeline for GTV Phase 2

Plans for the week ending 4/27/01:

?	Continue IT development of Phase I items.
?	Complete sign-off for GTV-II, Phase 2 issues and timeline.
?	Continue IT development of Phase 2 issues.

Issues / Open Items:

?	Implement "Group of Groups" for Cash Positions just as they are in Position Manager.
?	Verify with users if GDI Calc in ERMS should be done via 1 or 2 PortCalcs.

Thanks, Dave N


Please add the demand charge for excess fees for 9/00 on sale deal 157278 in
the amount of $1,175.51.

Thanks,
Megan


Tana:

The following CPs are not authorized to trade US power products:

Maguire Oil Company-  Restricted by Credit
Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.-  Restricted by Credit
Panda Energy International, Inc. - Restricted by Credit
Roswell Energy, Inc. Restricted by Credit
Copano Energy Services/Upper Gulf Coast L.P.- Restricted by Credit
US Steel:  Not a current CP/not FERC approved

***********************

Great River Energy: Will have to get back to you on this. They usually act as
agent for another company and I am waiting to get info on what they want to
do.

Thanks,

Shari


Ladies,

As a follow-up to yesterday's request:  I have included a spreadsheet that may help clarify the specific data our originators are looking for.  Also, I found a regional Capacity Report from RISI (hard copy).  If you have any further questions feel free to contact me.

Thanks,
Laura

Laura E. Bosek
Analyst
Enron Industrial Markets
(713) 345-1652
ext. 51652


Got a question about Enron or what our businesses are doing?  Ask Jeff
Skilling!  Join him for an Office of the Chairman "open mike" session today
(May 30) on eSpeak at 10 a.m. Houston time.
Can't make the live event?  No worries.  Go to eSpeak (
http://ethink.enron.com/eSpeak/exec/default.asp) now and submit your
question.  Jeff will try to answer it during his event and you can read the
transcript later.

Cost cutting ideas are still coming into the Thinkbank (
http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/Thinkbank.nsf/HomePage?OpenPage).
We know you've got some great ideas tucked away in that brainy head of yours
-- deposit them into the ThinkBank!

There's some fiesty conversations going on in eMeet
http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/eThink/eMeet.nsf.  Start your own today!


pls print.  thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 04/12/2000
03:09 PM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
04/12/2000 11:09 AM
To: Tim Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Ballentine/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Bily/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jack
Boatman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Shelley_Corman@enron.com, Christi Culwell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Farrell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, dfulton@enron.com, Lou Geiler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M
Hall/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Theresa Hess/ET&S/Enron, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Staci Holtzman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Anne Jolibois/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, rkilmer@enron.com, Frazier
King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda L
Lawrence/HOU/EES@EES, Blair Lichtenwalter/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth
Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Teb Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford
Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel
Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Palmer/HOU/EES@EES, Zelda Paschal/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Geneva
Patterson/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen
Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
Phillips/FGT/Enron@ENRON, jplace@enron.com, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jenny
Rub/GPGFIN/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dave Schafer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mike G Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louis
Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lon Stanton/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, James Studebaker/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gina Taylor/HOU/EES@EES, Debbie
Thompson/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Tosoni/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michael Van
Norden/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Veatch/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donald
Vignaroli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jody Warner/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Michele Winckowski/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: FERC Announces New Pipeline Interconnect Policy Today

Please read the attached memo regarding the significant shift in the
Commission's policy.   The policy sets out new interconnection criteria, but
announces that a pipeline may not deny an interconnection on economic grounds.


Both of these are capitalized terms in rev 23.  Is there a difference?  Load
Projection Model is in definitions, but Load Forecasting Model is used quite
a bit.

ckm


---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT on 12/06/2000 09:23 AM
---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
12/06/2000 09:12 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Veronica
Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: northwest power article


Notice No. 00-392
November 17, 2000

TO: ALL NYMEX AND COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS

FROM: Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

DATE:  November 17, 2000

RE:  Notice of CFTC Approval of Amendments to NYMEX Rule 3.47 ("Audit
Committee")
____________________________________________________________________

Please be advised that the CFTC has approved amendments to NYMEX Rule 3.47
("Audit Committee"), which are shown below and are now in effect.  The
amendments add an additional Public Director and expand the duties of the
Audit Committee to encompass consideration of the information to be included
in NYMEX filings to the SEC.

If you have any questions, please contact Michael Lugo, Vice President of
Internal Auditing, at  (212) 299-2268.

APPROVED AMENDMENTS TO NYMEX RULE 6.40A

(An asterisk indicates deletions; parentheses indicate deletions.)

Rule 3.47 AUDIT COMMITTEE

(A) The Audit Committee shall be a regular committee and shall consist of the
Chairman of the Board and *two*(three) Public Directors appointed by the
Board.  One of the Public Directors shall serve as Chairman of the Committee
(B) The Audit Committee shall:
(i) *on* (On) an annual basis:
(a) make a recommendation to the Board of Directors regarding selection,
retention and discharge of independent auditors for the ensuing year; and
(b) *(b)* review the scope and general extent of the independent auditors,
examination, the significant audit procedures which will be utilized, and
fees charged for their services.
((ii) Review the audited financial statements and discuss them with
management and the independent auditors. These discussions shall include, but
not be limited to, the matters required to be disclosed under Statement of
Auditing Standards No. 61 (established by the Auditing Standards Board) and
consideration of the quality of the Exchange,s accounting principles as
applied in its financial reporting, including a review of sensitive
accounting estimates, reserves and accruals, judgement areas, audit
adjustments (whether or not recorded), and other such inquires as the
Committee or the independent auditors shall deem appropriate.  Based on such
review, the Committee shall make its recommendation to the Board as to the
inclusion of the Exchange,s audited financial statements in the Exchange,s
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(iii) Discuss with representatives of management and the independent auditors:
(a) the interim financial information contained in the Exchange,s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q prior to its filing; and
(b) the results of the review by the independent auditors.)
(iv) *(ii) on* (On) a monthly basis, or at such times as the Committee shall
determine, but not less than twice each year, meet with the independent
auditors, President, Senior Vice President of Finance, *Director* (Vice
President) of Internal Audit and other personnel as the Committee deems
appropriate to review:
(a) the scope of the audit plan;
(b) the Exchange,s financial statements;
(c) the results of external and internal audits;
(d) the effectiveness of the Exchange,s system of internal controls;
(e) any limitations imposed by Exchange personnel on the independent
auditors; and
(f) such other matters as the Committee shall deem appropriate upon advising
the Executive Committee.
((v)) * review *(Review) the internal audit function of the Exchange,
including proposed audit programs for the coming year, the coordination of
such a programs with the independent auditors, the extent to which
recommendations made by the internal auditors or by the independent auditors
have been implemented, and management,s response to the recommendations of
the independent *auditors;* (auditors.)
(vi) *(iv)review,* (Review,)  at its discretion, compliance with codes of
conduct established the * Exchange;*(Exchange.)
((vii)) * consult* (Consult) with the independent auditors, and when
appropriate the * Director*  (Vice President) of Internal Audit, out of the
presence of management.
 * establish * ((viii)Establish) direct communication between the auditors
and the * Board; * (Board)
((ix))* initiate* (Initiate,) at its discretion, investigations within the
parameters of foregoing responsibilities, and for that purpose with the
approval of the Board, retain outside legal counsel, independent auditors, or
any other such experts as if may deem   *appropriate; and* (appropriate.)
((x))  * report* (Report) to the entire Board at such time as the (Committee
determines,) but not less than twice a year on the activities described in
this Rule.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-392)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


I want to place a $1 bid for Matt Hasselback- QB GB

I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO CANCEL MY BID FOR MIKE ANDERSON


Attached, please find a press release from Governor Davis announcing the
signing of SBX 6 which creates a PPA.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_htmldisplay.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@
0298965258.0990051291@@@@&BV_EngineID=eallccemeikbemfcfkmchcng.0&sCatTitle=Pre
ss+Release&sFilePath=/govsite/press_release/2001_05/20010516_L01015_GGD_signs_
SB6X_Power_Authority_bill.html&sTitle=GOVERNOR+SIGNS+CALIFORNIA+%0aPOWER+AUTHO
RITY+BILL%0a&iOID=14801


Ehud,

I had to cancel my trip to London. Steve Leppard will
take care of my presentations.

Vince

"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu> on 09/18/2000 09:12:47 AM
To: Lane Hughston <lane_hughston@yahoo.com>, vkamins@enron.com,
pnance@teknecon.com, ds64@cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu, Steven.Leppard@enron.com,
geman@edu.essec.fr, chris.harris@natpower.com
cc:
Subject: Dinner This Fri. in London?

Colleagues,

Greetings.

I'd like to plan a dinner subsequent to the adjournment of this week's EPRM
Conference in London Fri. 9/22.  Whereas some of you have already notified
me of your availability or travel plans, please advise whether you are
available for dinner on Fri. 9/22 or Sat. 9/23.

Ehud

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Department of Finance
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


The report named:
<http://trv.dev.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=8&report_name
=FT+-+Texas+P/L&category_cd=4&category_name=TEXAS&toc_hide=1&sTV1=4&TV1E
xp=Y&current_efct_date=05/29/2001> FT - Texas P/L, published as of
05/29/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


lisag@kis.ernet.in


568843 - added fee of .0275, but Sean Crandall believes price should stay at
300.00

569178 - changed broker from APB to Prebon

569021 - changed broker from APB to Bloomberg

569270 - changed broker from APB to Amerex

Stephanie Piwetz   04/03/2001 02:05 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Checkout 4/3/01

Kate, please check
APB showed
Diana Scholtes
568843.01   price 302.00  (and doesn't fee have .0275)

Apb did not show  Richter deal 569178.01

and Tom Alonso deal 569021.01 (apb only shows one trade 568998.01)
569021.01 >bloomberg, we received a broker confirm.

Sean Crandall 569270.01  apb no show

Thanks


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/21/2000 05:28 PM -----

	Paul Kaufman@ECT
	12/21/2000 03:28 PM

		 To: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stuart
Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Wanda
Curry/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Roger
Yang/SFO/EES@EES@ENRON, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES@ENRON, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Michael Smith/ENRON@enronxgate@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: California PUC Decision Info/Update

Brief summary of the proposed decision:

1. Commission will issue a final decision on rate adjustments and the end of
the rate freeze on January 4.    To reach the final decision, the Commission
will hold expedited hearings beginning December 27 to address:

 a. when rate freeze will end;
 b. rate adjustments neccesary to maintain utility solvency;
 c. whether utilities should retain remaining assets;
 d. whether utilies should use their retained assets to serve native load
(and what rate adjustments are necessary to accomplish such a result).

2. Commission will take action to maintain solvency of utilities and the
ability of the utilities to continue to provide service at just and
reasonable rates.

We will give a full report on the conference call scheduled below.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 12/21/2000 01:29
PM ---------------------------

Alan Comnes
12/21/2000 01:11 PM
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stuart
Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Wanda
Curry/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Roger
Yang/SFO/EES@EES@ENRON, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES@ENRON, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Michael Smith/ENRON@enronxgate@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: California PUC Decision Info/Update

Here's the order that has just been posted.  My understanding is the CPUC
will take this up at 2 p.m.

GAC

Joseph Alamo@ENRON
12/21/2000 10:30 AM
To: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stuart
Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Wanda
Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES,
Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Eric
Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Smith/ENRON@enronxgate
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: California PUC Decision Info/Update

On behalf of Jeff Dasovich, please note:

the California PUC decision will be available on
the PUC website @ 1:00 PM PST.

The Commission will continue the meeting @ 2:00 PM PST
to address the issue.

Thanks,

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Admin. Asst.
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


Do you know when you are flying into Pennsylvania.  It sounds like Barb,
Cindy and Mike, might be going in on Monday or Tuesday to tour Washington
DC.  Are you going to stay with relatives in PA or in a hotel.


Date:		February 26, 2002

To:		Enron Global Distribution

From:		Derryl Cleaveland, Sr. Director Global Strategic Sourcing

Subject:	Audio Conferencing Provider

Enron has selected WorldCom Conferencing as our sole conferencing provider.  Under a recently signed national contract, all Enron locations can utilize WorldCom for their conference calling needs at a substantial savings when compared to other conferencing providers.

The favorable pricing supplied to us by WorldCom Conferencing gives us a significant reduction in our conference call per minute rate, providing beneficial savings to our company.  In order to achieve these savings, it is critical that all Enron employees start, or continue, to use WorldCom for all your conferencing needs.

If you are currently using another company, please begin using WorldCom Conferencing for your audio conference needs. Enclosed is information on how to set up your user profile and start conferencing with WorldCom.

Should you need additional training, information on conferencing services, or assistance in planning a meeting please contact Torri Rhodes, WorldCom Conferencing Consultant at 713-651-3278.  For account management and sales support, please contact Sandra Audrain-Gorrie, District Sales Manager at 713-888-1369.   For all internal conferencing questions or concerns, please contact Peter Goebel, Global Strategic Sourcing, Director-IT/Telephony at 713-345-3325.


Hello Matt Motley,

In this issue:

- Feature Article: IRF: Our Favorite Power Semi
- Overview of renewables, distributed generation and power semiconductor sectors.

Sound Energy is a bi-weekly publication focusing on energy companies and sectors that strive to make energy more efficient or the environment cleaner. These sectors include renewable energy (including wind and solar power), distributed generation (fuel cells and microturbines), and power semiconductors.

To download this report Click here <http://www.reedwasden.com/members/download.asp?ID=129&email=matt.motley@enron.com>.
If a link does not appear above please copy the url between the '[' and ']' below and paste it into your browser.
[ http://www.reedwasden.com/members/download.asp?ID=129&email=matt.motley@enron.com ]
Please make sure that your email address is at the end of the url.

Thank you,
The Sector Reports Team

As always, we welcome any feedback on our research including questions and opinions.
To be removed from this mailing, click here <http://www.reedwasden.com/unsubscribe.asp?email=matt.motley@enron.com&pubid=2> or reply to this email with 'UNSUBSCRIBE-Sector Reports' in the subject field.


I think that this note did you receive you the first time...

Sorry, BT
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 6:00 PM
To:	'rwxc@pge.com'
Subject:	Gas Purchases and Transportation

Ray... seems like its been a while since we met in San Fransisco, ....  and of course so much has happened since then.

I have been talking with our in house legal and with Canada and I know Eric and yourself have also been talking. I believe that the door has been pushed open a little and if everyone tries to get these agreements cleaned up  and executed that PG&E and Enron ( Canada & US ) can start to transact.

With that being said, there are two areas which I would like to refresh from our discussions..

1.  Did you give any further thought to the utilization of Daily gas sales as a collateral.. I truly believe that this vehicle is a very efficient,easy way for PG&E to enhance the credit with ENA and once we have a 30 day bucket... we can get you trading access to EOL.  Lot's of details to work out, but I would like to keep this discussion at the forefront. I can send the details of how this proposal would work if required. ( let me know )

2.  As discussed, ENA holds some 5 year El Paso capacity. I am looking to assign this capacity and possibly and would like to investigate your supply requirements and possible alternatives such that you can consider our capacity.

I trust all is well and look forward to talking to you soon.

Barry Tycholiz


Sharon/Kriste,

If there are going to be revisions to the leave policy, I suggest that we
make major ones, including a segregation of FMLA leave from other types of
leave --i.e., two separate policies.  Let's talk about this on Tuesday -----
Majorly important!!

Michelle

Sharon Butcher@ENRON
01/13/2000 05:38 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kriste Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Leave Policy

Dear Michelle and Kriste:   Please review and let me have your comments.
Thanks.  Sharon
---------------------- Forwarded by Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron on 01/13/2000
05:32 PM ---------------------------

Elaine Paul
12/14/99 08:57 PM
To: Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cynthia Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan Tosoni/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Leave Policy

Here are a few edits to the Approved Time Off and Leaves of Absence policy.

Benefits has not included a "second or third opinion by another health care
provider paid for by the Company" as it has significant implications to our
LTD plan and has created at least one problem that I am aware of in the past.
We will need to think through what the certification document might look like
and would look to you for some guidelines.   The concern I have is around
privacy and use of information given potential regulation.
Cynthia believes that we should run FMLA concurrent with sick time.  I agree
and have noted that in the document.

Sharon, could you please review the wording to ensure I haven't missed
something here from a legal perspective.  I will follow-up with you by phone
shortly.

Susan, here are the "long-since promised" wording changes we propose.

Thanks,

Elaine


Eliz -- I need your group to put together a search which captures the
comments of PG&E and Edison officials in trade press, anlyst reports, and
speeches which would be inconsistent with the idea that they can now recover
their shortfall.  In other words, when they were trying to get AB 1890
passed, when they were fighting Proposition 9, when they floated their "rate
reduction bonds" and when they talked to analysts and rating agencies I'm
sure they assumed that they would live under the rate freeze and take the
risk of stranded cost recovery whithin the statutory deadline.

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/27/2000 11:45 AM -----

	"Dick S George" <dsgeorge@firstworld.net>
	09/27/2000 08:04 AM

		 To: "Dick George" <dsgeorge@firstworld.net>
		 cc:
		 Subject: WSJ: PG&E's Huge losses...

CC list suppressed...
September 27, 2000
California Utilities' LossesOn Electricity Pose Risk

By REBECCA SMITH

Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

California's two biggest utilities are losing so much
money buying electricity in the state's deregulated
market that they have run up deficits equivalent to half
their net worth in just four months.

If the cost of wholesale power continues to exceed the
price these utilities are allowed to bill their
customers, as currently seems likely, they could become
technically insolvent sometime next year. That would put
pressure on regulators to orchestrate a
multibillion-dollar public bailout, similar to the "too
big to fail'' response that in the past pushed
governments to rescue banks.

Such a scenario is quietly being discussed by bond-rating
concerns that recently reduced their credit outlooks for
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., a unit of San Francisco-based
PG&E Corp., and Southern California Edison, a unit of
Edison International of Rosemead, Calif. Bond- rating
concerns say they aren't sure how much additional debt
can be borne by the two affected utilities before they
will have difficulty paying their bills.

Probe of California Power Prices Begins, but New Plants
Aren't Seen as Solution (Sept. 11)

Los Angeles Utility Is Benefitting, Surprisingly, From
Deregulation (Sept. 6)

California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Electricity Costs
(Sept. 1)
"If this is just a seasonal aberration, the utilities can
get through it," says Lori Woodland, analyst for Fitch
IBCA. "If it goes on for six or nine months, it's a very
serious situation." Adds A.J. Sabatelle, senior credit
officer at Moody's Investors Service Inc.: "At some
point, you have a financial crisis."

The utilities say they are having no difficulty meeting
expenses and don't envision problems in servicing their
debts. But they are vigorously lobbying state and federal
regulators to change the rules of the game, hoping
somehow to raise rates to make up for the shortfall. The
California utilities' experience may be a harbinger of
what could happen in other states where wholesale power
prices have surpassed the amount that utilities are
allowed to charge their ratepayers.

For now, utilities are making ends meet by going to the
financial markets to borrow money. PG&E, a giant utility
that serves one out of every 20 Americans, is seeking
approval to increase its debt capacity by $1.4 billion.
It is borrowing $200 million, while Edison is tapping
$250 million from the commercial paper market. "This is
going to be a long, tough road," says Jim Scilacci, chief
financial officer for Southern California Edison.

Today's situation represents a complete turnabout from
what was expected when California deregulated its energy
market on March 31, 1998, which opened electricity
pricing to competition. California tried to give its
utilities a competitive edge nationally by deregulating
faster than other states and by creating a mechanism to
allow investor-owned utilities, such as PG&E and Edison,
to quickly pay down debts incurred to serve customers
under the old regulatory system.

To do this, the state legislature set retail rates at
high levels, which, at first, generated fat surpluses for
the utilities. As the money piled up, utilities used it
to pay down debts for generation facilities that were
otherwise unprofitable in the new deregulated world. By
the end of this June, PG&E and Edison together had
collected more than $12 billion and were on track to
finish paying down debts well ahead of the March 31,
2002, deadline set by the legislature. At that point,
rate freezes were to end and retail prices were to
fluctuate with the market.

But all that went out the window in June, when wholesale
power prices surged, topping the rates the utilities were
allowed to charge retail customers. Average prices at
state-sanctioned energy markets were four to five times
the prices of a year earlier, and three to four times the
level utilities could charge customers.

The accumulated shortfall has been so enormous at PG&E,
that analysts expect its deficit to exceed $3 billion by
Oct. 31, more than half its shareholder equity of $5.7
billion, which is defined as assets minus liabilities.
Southern California Edison finished August with a deficit
of $2 billion, equivalent to almost two-thirds its net
worth of $3.2 billion. The utilities, though they have
been accumulating deficits, aren't required to report
these as losses on their earnings statements.

That leaves utilities in a bind. They want to end the
rate freeze to be able to pass on the real cost of
electricity to consumers. But should the freeze end
before the statutory deadline of 2002, they get
clobbered. That is because they will immediately have to
book a loss on their power-purchase deficits. What's
more, they can't use the proceeds from planned
power-plant sales to cover those losses; instead, should
the freeze end, they will be obliged to refund some of
the proceeds to ratepayers. In PG&E's case, the refunds
could total $500 million, while in Edison's case, the
amount is $254 million.

Publicly at least, utility executives insist a mechanism
will be found to let them recoup the money spent on
electricity.

Consumer advocates are gearing up for the fight. Nettie
Hoge, executive director for San Francisco consumer group
Utility Reform Network, says ratepayers shouldn't end up
footing the bill for a deal cut by utilities that
benefited them before prices shot up.

Utility executives are now distancing themselves from the
legislation that got them into such a mess, which was
drafted with their assistance. PG&E Chairman Robert Glynn
says it is best not to "overanalyze" the "old deal."
Instead, he says, regulators and legislators should sit
down with utilities and construct a new agreement, since
"it's in the broad interests of the state not to have
critical energy infrastructure look like a leper."

Mr. Glynn says the current deal offers "mutually assured
destruction" to both utilities and ratepayers. Something
must be done, he says, or consumers throughout most of
the state will experience "a San Diego-style rate shock."
The utility serving that city, San Diego Gas & Electric
Co., ended its freeze a year ago and began passing
wholesale power costs directly through to ratepayers.
Legislators intervened this summer, however, and
temporarily capped retail rates when monthly power bills
nearly tripled. The utility, a unit of Sempra Energy, is
also accumulating a deficit as a result.

So long as banks and bond markets believe the utilities
will be repaid, they will be able to borrow, analysts
say. "Until we hear politicians of consequence state
otherwise, our position is that we believe the utilities
will be made whole," says Richard Cortright, a director
at Standard & Poor's corporate ratings group.

But that opinion could change if it looks like the
utilities will have to swallow a big loss. The result:
lower credit ratings that would raise borrowing costs and
could trigger a downward spiral. "You're talking about
top-rated companies, though," said Ms. Woodland of Fitch
IBCA. "To get to insolvency, a lot would have to happen."

In the meantime, utilities are doing all they can to
control the hemorrhaging. They have gotten authority from
regulators to buy more power under long-term contracts at
fixed prices, reducing their vulnerability to spot-market
volatility. And they have petitioned federal regulators
to declare California's market so badly flawed that
generators should be denied market pricing and, even,
ordered to pay refunds.

Nevertheless, several forces are working against them.
Although they can sign bilateral contracts, prices remain
high for those as well. What's more, they can't buy less
power than their customers need. If they don't buy
enough, the California Independent System Operator, the
organization responsible for reliability, will step in
and make purchases for them and send them the bill.

Perhaps the biggest problem facing PG&E and Edison,
though, is one of timing. The California legislature is
out of session until December, and regulators haven't
even really started to address the issue formally. In the
meantime, the utilities' deficit is growing by tens of
millions of dollars daily.

Write to Rebecca Smith at rebecca.smith@wsj.com


Did you get a chance to look at the Credit GTC?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000 03:06
PM ---------------------------

Edmund Cooper
02/24/2000 01:01 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Gail
Hill/LON/ECT@ECT, Oliver Gaylard/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Product - ENA confirmation

Dear Mark,

Hope you are well!

I've attached the confirmation for the EOL bankruptcy swaps where ENA will be
the contracting entity.  I've followed the format of the online ENA swap
confirm but kept the economics the same as for the European bankruptcy swap
confirm.  Please let me know if you are happy with this.

Thanks, Edmund.


Group-

Last night there was a strategy that was implemented that needs some
clarification.  We bought from EPE at PV and imported to the ISO.  We then
did an SC trade (internal interchange) with WESCO in SP15.  When we do this,
we do not want to adjust bid our import. If the import were to be cut due to
congestion higher than our adjustment bid, we will be subject to replacement
costs, which may be as much as the highest out of market energy price.
However, if we send in the import without an adjustment bid, we are subject
to a maximum of $250 per Mw.  This is potentially a substantial loss, but a
least it is a known (and manageable) downside. In order to mitigate this risk
of congestion, we can run a wheel in at Four Corners (with bid at $200) and
out at Palo Verde (with bid of $150).  With both the import and the wheel for
congestion relief, any congestion will be a wash and our only downside will
be our transmission from PV to FC.

If this does not make complete sense, let me know and I will try to explain
it further.

Cheers
Jesse


<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">

<BASE HREF="http://football222.fantasy.sportsline.com/mp/">

Save 10% Speak No Evil, Hear No Evil Monkey Bikes... One of the Hottest Gifts for Holiday 2001... Just enter the coupon code MQJ36GX6 in the checkout process to receive your discount.  Offer expires November 16, 2001.

Want to win your Fantasy League?  Our Fantasy Football Guides are the SOURCE for strategy, player ratings, scouting reports, team reports, projections and more!  A must have for beginners and Fantasy veterans alike.  Special in season price $9.99. Going Fast - Click Here!

Save $.05 a gallon on the gas that keeps your car's engine clean. Click here to apply online.

Brought to you by

<MAP NAME="menu.map">
<AREA shape="rect" coords="0, 1, 83, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/217/sffer1113e.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="83, 1, 166, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/12/sffer1113w.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="166, 1, 249, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/226/sffer1113c.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="249, 1, 332, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffer1113v.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="332, 1, 415, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/163/sffer1113t.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="415, 1, 498, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/1/sffer1113s.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="498, 1, 581, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/10/sffer1113i.cgi">

<AREA shape="rect" coords="581, 1, 664, 25"
href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/5/3/sffer1113ffr.cgi">

</MAP>

You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for
    CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule,
    or turn off these reports please
    click here

NFL Reports, Player Updates

Latest NFL Player News

Rod Smith, WR DEN - Matty Updated 11/19/01
Smith (ankle) could not finish Sunday's game. His status for Thursday's game against Dallas is unclear.

Terance Mathis, WR ATL - Frank Updated 11/19/01
Mathis has by far his best game of the season, catching seven passes for 70 yards against Green Bay. He suffered a mild concussion in the game, but he's expected to be fine for this weekend's contest at Carolina.

Jackie Harris, TE DAL - Free Agent Updated 11/19/01
Harris suffered a strained right hamstring during Sunday's game against Philadelphia. He did not return to the contest, and is listed as day to day.

Frank Sanders, WR ARI - Free Agent Updated 11/19/01
Sanders had a huge game against Detroit on Sunday, catching seven passes for 127 yards and a touchdown. He injured his hamstring in the game, however, and is listed as day to day.

Quincy Carter
, QB DAL - Free Agent Updated 11/19/01
Carter feels as though his hamstring has healed enough that he's ready to return to action. However, the Cowboys will start Ryan Leaf for a few more weeks before Carter gets his starting job back. The team wants to evaluate Leaf in a few games this season to determine if he'll have any trade value in the offseason.

James Jackson, RB CLE - Hunter Updated 11/19/01
Jackson told the Cleveland Plain-Dealer it was a coach's decision not to use him against the Ravens. Jackson had been suffering from an ankle injury, but reports prior to gametime had indicated he might have been able to play. With the sudden emergence of Benjamin Gay, Jackson's Fanta!
sy!
 value might drop greatly.

Ryan Leaf, QB DAL - Free Agent Updated 11/19/01
Leaf had another terrible outing this weekend, but the Dallas Morning News is reporting that he'll remain the team's starting quarterback for the time being. However, he's no better than waiver wire fodder in Fantasy Football.

Kevin Lockett, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/19/01
Lockett left Sunday's game against Denver in the first quarter due to a rib injury. His status for next week's game against Philadelphia is uncertain at this time. !

Tony Banks, QB WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/19/01
Banks, who suffered a concussion during Sunday's game against Denver, told the Washington Post that there's a "definite possibility" he would be ready in time for next weekend's game against Philadelphia. Kent Graham would start if Banks is unable to play, but neither QB is an attractive Fantasy option against the Eagles.

Emmitt Smith, RB DAL - Bass/Hull Updated 11/19/01
Smith left Sunday's game against Philadelphia with a sprained knee. However, he is expected to be in the starting lineup when Dalla!
s !
faces Denver on Thanksgiving Day.

Larry Foster, WR DET - Free Agent Updated 11/19/01
Foster suffered an apparent leg injury during Sunday's game against Arizona. He is listed as day to day.

Desmond Howard, WR DET - Free Agent Updated 11/19/01
Howard suffered a shoulder injury during Sunday's win over Arizona. He did not return to the game, and is listed as day to day.

Bert Emanuel!
</!
A>
, WR DET - Free Agent Updated 11/19/01
Emanuel suffered a knee injury during Sunday's game against Arizona. He is listed as day to day.

Muhsin Muhammad, WR CAR - Martin Updated 11/18/01
Muhammad sprained his left shoulder in Sunday's game against the 49ers. His status for the Week 11 game against Atlanta is unclear.

Mike Anderson, RB DEN - Neal/McKay Updated 11/18/01
Anderson rushed for only 31 yards on 13 carries against the Redskins. Olandis Gary carried the ball 10!
 t!
imes for 28 yards. It is apparent Anderson is no longer worthy of a starting spot on Fantasy teams, and Gary will continue to see some work at his expense.

Michael Westbrook, WR WAS - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Westbrook caught nine passes for 104 yards and a TD at Denver. Opposing defenses are focusing on rookie Rod Gardner, and Westbrook is getting open often after starting the year slowly.

Jake Plummer, QB ARI - Frank Updated 11/18/01

Plummer threw for 334 yards, four TDs and was intercepted once by Detroit. Such stellar performances are rare for Plummer, who may not have a better game this season.

Michael Pittman, RB ARI - Matty Updated 11/18/01
The awful Detroit defense limited Pittman to 81 rushing yards on 23 carries. Don't start Pittman in any upcoming weeks unless your team is very thin at RB..

David Sloan, TE DET - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Sloan caught two TD passes for a total of three yards at Arizona. If you are desperate for help at TE, consider Sloan!
, !
who always gets regular looks from Charlie Batch.

Lamont Warren, RB DET - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Warren rushed for 32 yards and a TD at Arizona and caught 11 passes for 64 yards and a score. The Lions will continue to feature Warren on third downs and near the goal line as a receiver, making him a good Fantasy backup for the rest of the year.

Warrick Dunn, RB TB - Martin Updated 11/18/01

Dunn caught 12 passes for 138 yards against the Bears, but he rushed for only 12 yards and fumbled twice. Don't count on Dunn for consistently good Fantasy numbers during the next few weeks. He can be explosive, but he is also erratic.

Keyshawn Johnson, WR TB - Giggles Updated 11/18/01
Johnson caught 12 passes for 89 yards against the Bears, but he failed to get in the end zone again. Don't depend on Johnson down the stretch unless your team is very thin at wideout.

David Terrell, WR CHI - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Terrell caught o!
ne!
 pass for 15 yards at Tampa Bay. The rookie wideout is not consistent enough to start for most Fantasy teams.

Marty Booker, WR CHI - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01
Booker caught seven passes for 165 yards and three TDs at Tampa Bay. In his third season, Booker has become a superb Fantasy wideout. He is a player you must start every week, no matter what matchup he faces.

Plaxico Burress, WR PIT - Free Agent Updated 11/18/01

The Jaguars limited Burress to one catch for 13 yards. The second-year receiver has still not proven he can be a reliable Fantasy player.

LaDainian Tomlinson, RB SD - Hunter Updated 11/18/01
Tomlinson put up decent rushing numbers against Oakland, posting 68 yards and a touchdown. His overall statistics have been down in recent weeks, however, which may have something to do with the fact that he held out for the entire preseason.

Hines Ward, WR PIT - Tori Updated 11/18/01
Ward caught nine passes for 112 yards and a TD against Jacks!
on!
ville. While he doesn't score often, Ward has become a very solid receiver for Pittsburgh this year, and he will always post respectable totals.

Doug Flutie, QB SD - Russell Updated 11/18/01
Flutie's recent struggles continued against Oakland, throwing for only 98 yards on Sunday. Unless he faces a good matchup, starting Flutie is becoming somewhat of a gamble.

Stacey Mack, RB JAC - Hunter Updated 11/18/01

Mack was held to six rushing yards on eight carries at Pittsburgh. He has not been a reliable back for the Jaguars or Fantasy owners this season.

Rich Gannon, QB OAK - Martin Updated 11/18/01
Gannon had a solid outing against San Diego, throwing for 311 yards and four touchdowns. He's one of the top five Fantasy quarterbacks in the league and is a must-start every week.

More Updates

Transactions, View

 Make Selection

		There are no League Transactions which meet the selected criteria.

To see all league transactions select "All", "All", "All Teams" from
the Transactions, View page.

Schedule, Breakdown

Tori

Player	Pos	Points

Fiedler, Jay	QB	4.0

George, Eddie	RB	6.0

Martin, Curtis	RB	7.0

Carter, Cris	WR	0.0

Holt, Torry	WR	14.0

Toomer, Amani	WR	0.0

Richey, Wade	K	6.0

Eagles	DT	31.0

TOTAL	 	68.0

Ward, Hines	WR	17.0

Allen, Terry	RB	0.0

Barlow, Kevan	RB	2.0

Brookins, Jason	RB	8.0

Pathon, Jerome	WR	0.0

Weinke, Chris	QB	16.0

		at Giggles

Player	Pos	Points

Culpepper, Daunte	QB	0.0

Bettis, Jerome	RB	5.0

Staley, Duce	RB	13.0

Conway, Curtis	WR	15.0

Johnson, Keyshawn	WR	8.0

Jurevicius, Joe	WR	0.0

Hollis, Mike	K	1.0

Raiders	DT	7.0

TOTAL	 	49.0

Wheatley, Tyrone	RB	0.0

Johnson, Rob	QB	0.0

Canidate, Trung	RB	0.0

McAllister, Deuce	RB	1.0

Minor, Travis	RB	2.0

Warrick, Peter	WR	2.0

Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.
Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com

FB10SP


chk email for the stuff i did yesterday on solutions doc.  lots of edits and
did consistent formatting.  jeff


Start Date: 10/10/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101005.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...