----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 07:56 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich@EES
	09/22/2000 10:24 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Retail Wheeling: FERC Chief Asks Congress For
Retroactive Rate ...

Richard.  FYI.  Do we have a date set yet to meet with Tim in Portland?

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/22/2000 10:23 AM -----

	Miyung Buster@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	09/22/2000 10:08 AM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin@EES, Susan Mara@EES, Paul
Kaufman@ECT, Karen Denne@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich@EES, Mark Palmer@ENRON, James D
Steffes@EES, Richard Shapiro@EES, Elizabeth Linnell@EES, Jeannie
Mandelker@ECT, filuntz@aol.com, Mark Schroeder@ECT, Peter Styles@ECT,
Liz@luntz.com, Mona L Petrochko@EES, Peggy Mahoney@EES, Nicholas
O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Bradley@ENRON, Shelley Corman@ENRON, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Retail Wheeling: FERC Chief Asks Congress For
Retroactive Rate ...

FERC Chief Asks Congress For Retroactive Rate Authority

09/21/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones&Company, Inc.)
WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman James
Hoecker Thursday asked Congress to give the commission new authority to order
refunds in the event of electricity price gouging.
Hoecker sought the retroactive ratemaking authority in the context of the
commission's investigation of power market volatility in California this
summer, where prices for San Diego consumers have more than doubled from last
year.
Congress should give FERC "authority to retroactively correct extraordinary
wealth transfers that can happen when prices unexpectedly skyrocket and
consumers cannot get out of the way," Hoecker told the House Government
Reform Committee.
The commission, in response to a petition from San Diego Gas&Electric Co., a
unit of Sempra Energy (SRE), has ordered a staff investigation of the market
situation in California.
FERC will order refunds if it determines that power producers have obtained
"unjust or unreasonable" prices for the power they sold into California
electricity markets overseen by the state's power exchange and independent
system operator, Hoecker said.
But under the Federal Power Act, FERC can't order any refunds beyond the Aug.
23 date of its order setting the investigation, the nation's chief energy
regulator noted.
"We do not now have that authority," he said.
"The commission staff is hard at work on completing its fact-finding
investigation. Based on the staff report to the commission, we will be
prepared to take further measures, as appropriate," Hoecker testified.
"The commission expects its actions and the measures adopted by the state
will moderate price volatility in California markets," he said.
By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires, 202-862-6647, bryan.lee@dowjones.com

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Retail Wheeling
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 49

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Bill and Jeff will have their own hardhats.

Thanks,
Joannie

stanmarek@marekbros.com on 05/04/2001 10:14:48 AM
To: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Follow-Up - Brent Larsen

I'll be in the Lobby of the Enron building at 11 AM.

Will they have their own hardhats or should I get some?

-Stan


We looked into this, and I have another call with them tomorrow.  So far it
looks like they are long the balance of the year.

----Original Message-----
   >From:      John Sherriff/LON/ECT
   >To:          Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT,John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate
   >Cc:
   >Bcc:
   >Subj:      Portland General
   >Sent:     Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:06 AM
   >
   >With the severe draught in Oregon my guess is PGE is shorter than 500MW
this year. You may
   >want to ask Stan Horton about their status.
   >
   >John


Kay,

 Joe Curreri at ENSR wanted me to let you know that he is still waiting on
the signed extension letter (Master Services Agreement).  Once you initial
it, please have someone deliver it to Janet Dietrich as she then needs to
sign it before sending it back to Joe at ENSR.  Please let me know if there
is anything I need to do to get this process completed.  Thanks.

Stephen
x 33890


>  <<FritoLayRFP-CA-2nd Round.doc>>  <<Frito-LayCA2ndRoundattachment1.xls>>
>  <<Frito-LayCA2ndRoundBidForm1.xls>>  <<GISB Base (8-7-01) rev.ZIP>>
> <<Frito Lay GISB Spec Prov2.doc>>  <<GISB EXHIBIT A.doc>>

 - FritoLayRFP-CA-2nd Round.doc
 - Frito-LayCA2ndRoundattachment1.xls
 - Frito-LayCA2ndRoundBidForm1.xls
 - GISB Base (8-7-01) rev.ZIP
 - Frito Lay GISB Spec Prov2.doc
 - GISB EXHIBIT A.doc


Alan,

You should have received updated numbers from Keith Holst.  Call me if you did not receive them.

Phillip


Kevin --

Last update that I know about for CDWR costs.  If Sue or Jeff know of later $ figures, please advise Kevin.  Also, my understanding was that the CPUC simply disallowed the CDWR from having straight passthru without review.  They may get to charge 100% of these dollars, but needs CPUC approval.

Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Tribolet, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject: New CDWR Revenue Requirement

I have attached a comparison of the revised CDWR Revenue Requirement, along with a comparison with the July 22nd figures.

* The total DWR dollars decrease $471.5 million over 2001 and 2002, centered in the periods 3Q 2001 and onward.  The "past problem" actually increases by $1.9 billion (1Q & 2Q 2001).
* PG&E has their share increased $730.1 million over 2002 and 2002, centered in 1Q and 2Q 2001.
* Edison ends up with a significant decrease of $1.199 billion in 2001 and 2002.

Regards,

Michael


Some LDC tariffs are available through the state PUC web sites, but not
many.  If you're looking for particular LDC's, I can get you the PUC web
sites.

Also, you might check with Paul Tate in EES (handles east region logistics).
EES used to have some kind of data base into which they were loading the LDC
tariffs, but I could never get into it.  I think it was called E-file or
something like that.  Since they sold off the group that was developing it,
it may not be available to us anymore.

(Let me know what you find out.)

Chris Germany
02/23/2000 12:31 PM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LDC Tariffs

Do we have a website with LDC tariff's that you are aware of?


GE posts an LOC in lieu of retainage.

From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 01/16/2001 11:47 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Letter of Credit from GE for LM6000s

What is this for?  The project entity for PSCO is Fountain Valley Power,
L.L.C.


CP, would you please follow up and get the right forms to fill out.  I will
give my $5k.
thanks,
mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
11:53 AM ---------------------------

Enron PAC@ENRON
06/15/2000 06:05 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Enron PAC Mail
cc:
Subject: PAC ENROLLMENT

Last year the Enron Political Action Committee (PAC) launched a campaign to
become a "million dollar PAC".  Enron employees, who provide all of the
funding for the PAC, responded and the Enron PAC reached its objective,
becoming one of the largest corporate PACs.  This year we face a new
challenge.  With the sale of EOG, the announced sale of PGE and normal
employee turnover, we have lost a significant number of consistent
contributors.  We are seeking your support.  If you are not a member, please
join.  If you are a member, we hope you will consider increasing your
contribution.

The Enron PAC is an essential tool in our effort to promote sound public
policy.  Our PAC funds support local, state and federal candidates, of both
parties, who support open markets, deregulation and customer choice.  Amounts
contributed may be used to make political contributions in connection with
federal and state elections and are subject to the limits of the Federal
Election Campaign Act.  While our PAC has grown thanks to our employee
contributions, it still generates just a fraction of the expenditures of
those who oppose these ideals.

This year, as always, we face challenges and opportunities for every one of
our businesses, including such issues as taxation and regulation of
e-commerce, electric industry restructuring, regulation of derivatives,
international trade and investment legislation, pipeline safety, local and
state decisions affecting the siting and interconnection of power plants and
a variety of environmental and tax issues.  Enron has a long and successful
track record of supporting and advancing good public policy.  That track
record depends on access to and regular communication with, decision makers.
The PAC provides that access - - it shows policy makers that real voters care
about what they are doing.

One of the best things about Enron is that we don,t just take things as they
are.  We challenge the status quo.  We ask why.  We change things.  The PAC
helps us do that.  We need you to help the PAC.  Sign up today - and please
consider the following contribution guidelines:

Manager    $500/year
Director     $750/year
Sr. Director/General Manager  $1,000/year
Vice President    $2,500/year
Sr. VP/Managing Director  $3,500/year
Executive Committee   $5,000/year

All contributions are voluntary and these guidelines are merely suggestions.
You are free to contribute more or less than the guidelines suggested and
Enron will not favor or disadvantage anyone by reason of the amount of their
contribution or their decision not to contribute.  You may refuse to
contribute without fear of reprisal.

Only U.S. citizens and resident-aliens living in the U.S. can contribute to
the Enron PAC.  The maximum contribution is $5,000 per year per individual.
An individual may not contribute more than $25,000 to all federal candidates
and committees within a calendar year.  The law requires that Enron report
name, address, employer and occupation for every person who contributes over
$200/year.

No portion of any contribution is deductible as a charitable contribution for
federal income tax purposes.

Thanks for your support!  Sign up now, or revise your current contribution
level by connecting with the PAC intranet site:

http://pacmembers.enron.com


Assembly Rev & Tax Cmte Chair Ellen Corbett has  decided that there will be a
suspense file in her committee, with the same  threshold as the
Appropriations Committee (i.e., $150,000 fiscal impact).?  You may recall
that former chair Johan Klehs had a similar rule, but it was  discarded in
1995 and has not been used since then.? An exception to this  rule will be
measures that gain revenue (such as AB 128x, the excess profits tax  on
energy generators).? Therefore, as all tax bills have at least that much
fiscal impact, all bills will go to suspense.? How many will come of is
another question.

Chris Micheli, Esq.
Carpenter Snodgrass  & Associates
1201 K Street, Suite 710
Sacramento, CA?  95814
(916) 447-2251
FAX: (916) 445-5624
EMAIL: cmicheli@carpentersnodgrass.com


I'm available if needed.  Just let me know.

Best,
Jeff


FYI-

The list that I referred to at yesterday's meeting.  . .

Thanks,
Carrie
---------------------- Forwarded by Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000
05:39 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jeffrey C Gossett                           07/07/2000 10:30 AM

To: Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Risk Meeting notes

Here are the top issues which the top performers in risk identified in this
morning's meeting in no particular order:

1.  All physical curves out by 2:30.  All financial curves out by 3:15.
2.  Streamline nightly checkout process.
3.  No more deal tickets.
4. Systems person or persons on the floor.
5. Notification of any curve change in the system.
6. Specific cut off time for all deal tickets.
7. Cross regional training
8. Stock options
9.  Back-ups for all big books
10. Combat Pay
11. Only 2nd yr analysts.
12. Automatic notification when a deal has been changed.  (Canada,
Logistics,  or trader)

I don't think any of these requests is unreasonable.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2000
07:26 AM ---------------------------

"NW on Application Service Providers" <ApplicationService@bdcimail.com> on
04/27/2000 03:30:09 AM
Please respond to "Application Service Providers Help"
<NWReplies@bellevue.com>
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Get ready for virtual businesses

NETWORK WORLD FUSION FOCUS: MIKE JUDE and NANCY MEACHIM
on APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDERS
Today's focus: Get ready for virtual businesses
04/26/00

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~This newsletter
sponsored by Citrix ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Citrix is the world leader in application server software that ASPs
worldwide depend on to deliver mission-critical applications with
enterprise-class reliability and control. Citrix enables you to reach
more users, with more applications, in more locations - with record
speed, greater predictability and lower costs. Find out why the world's
leading ASPs depend on Citrix to stand out from the competition.
Call 1-800-644-9358 or visit us at
http://nww1.com/go/1187290a.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Subscribe to the "Whitepapers Download" newsletter from Network World!!
Keep up-to-date with summaries and links to the latest vendor-sponsored
whitepapers on Network World Fusion.
Subscribe to Whitepapers Download at
http://www.nwfusion.com/go/wppromo.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Today's focus: Get ready for virtual businesses
---------------------------------------------
By Mike Jude and Nancy Meachim

The ASP model as it is currently formulated is not really viable in the
long run.

Though hosting applications has opened a world of possibilities and
cost savings for end users, application service providers who simply
host applications don,t have much to offer. They also have the problem
of being the customer contact. If the network fails and customers can,t
access an application, they blame their ASP, not the network provider.

For these reasons, many ASPs are expanding to offer more value, such as
delivering network services along with their applications. Enterprise
Management Associates advocates this approach - but looking to the
future, as analysts are supposed to do, we see a much longer value
chain. Providing other services along with applications is one step up,
but beyond that, we see a huge potential in the virtual space ASPs have
created.

We are already beginning to see pioneering companies exploring the
possibilities. For example, Minnesota company Agiliti is building an
online suite of applications with a consistent front end. This
coordinated suite of business applications is accessed through third-
party partners who provide customer care and support. The value that
Agiliti offers is the integration and maintenance for a complete,
business-enabling software infrastructure. In a sense, this is an
online corporate back office.

As ASPs evolve into full-service providers, more of them will offer
service and support combinations similar to Agiliti,s. But what about
the front end of the business, the product development side of things?
We,ve found one ASP that has evolved quickly to become a full-service,
front-end infrastructure provider, offering product development,
fabrication and prototyping.

Toolwire, a Silicon Valley start-up, provides a complete, integrated
tool set for electrical engineers. This tool set incorporates state-of-
the-art design and fabrication software, as well as online information
and training in the latest tools and support from various electronic
suppliers and fabricators. Toolwire,s vision is to provide a virtual
space where engineers worldwide can collaborate on the design of
advanced electronic devices. Through an extensive partner network,
Toolwire provides not only tools but also collaborative space,
processing power, training and supplier support. In a nutshell, the
company sells a virtual corporation to any entrepreneur with a good
idea. Ultimately, Toolwire expects to expand to incorporate the supply-
and-distribution chain through its site as well.

As e-commerce speeds up, a significant advantage is gained by reducing
the latency involved in delivering new products to market. In the area
of electronics, latency is often due to the acquisition of new tools to
facilitate the design process. Toolwire,s approach dramatically reduces
latency for start-ups by eliminating the need to invest in highly
volatile and very expensive design tool sets. Likewise, Agiliti reduces
latency by off-loading the IT infrastructure support from an enterprise.

Breaking new ground, of course, carries with it the problem of
definition. What do you call this new virtual workplace, which combines
all the necessary tools to design, produce, market and deliver a
product without the need for any physical infrastructure? (Agiliti and
Toolwire haven,t reached this goal yet, but it is within their sights.)
The label we,ve come up with is &virtual business service provider.8
This entity transcends the full-service ASP by not only providing
access to the services and applications a company needs but also
actually providing the entire company itself.

Companies like Agiliti and Toolwire are commodifying the enterprise.
The day is coming, very shortly, when an entrepreneur with a good idea
will be able to sit down at a terminal; design a product; ship the
specs to a fabricator; order components; plug into the appropriate
accounting, billing and inventory systems; line up distribution
channels, sales and marketing resources; and obtain financing. And the
entrepreneur will be able to do all that without touching anything more
physical than a keyboard.

Welcome to the business in a box!

To contact Mike Jude and Nancy Meachim:
---------------------------------------
Senior consultant Michael Jude and research director Nancy Meachim are
with Enterprise Management Associates in Boulder, Colo.,
(http://www.enterprisemanagement.com), a leading analyst and market
research firm focusing exclusively on all aspects of enterprise
management. Jude has over 18 years of experience in the
telecommunications industry, most recently with US West, where he was a
manager of public policy. Mike can be reached at
mailto:jude@enterprisemanagement.com. Meachim focuses on e-business
management. She is currently conducting a research study on ASP
management that is due to be released in April. Nancy's email address
is mailto:meachim@enterprisemanagement.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR RELATED LINKS -- Click here for Network World's home page:
http://www.nwfusion.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Agiliti:
http://www.agiliti.com/

Toolwire:
http://www.toolwire.com/

Agiliti turns to resellers for new ASP service, Network World, 03/24/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2000/0324agiliti.html

Archive of Network World Fusion Focus on ASPs newsletters:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/asp/

May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered at your
fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by receiving 51 FREE
issues to our print publication. Apply today at
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl

*********************************************************
Subscription Services

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail newsletters,
go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To change your email address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to this
message.

Other Questions/Comments

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor, at:
mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Account Executive,
at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Network World Fusion is part of IDG.net, the IDG Online Network.
IT All Starts Here:
http://www.idg.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2000


DId you talk to Burkhart??  I prefer him but if not, I will ask Mauricio.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001 11:14
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
01/10/2001 10:14 AM
To: Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Catherine Clark/Enron@EnronXGate, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred
Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Revised notices for CA I and CAII

I'm attaching the notices for CA I and CA II.  Please pay particular
attention to CA II, since it is the first time it has been circulated.
Obviously, we will need to insert the final purchase numbers.

Lisa, I set it up so ENA is consenting, which tracks the language in the DCMA.

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/15/2001 03:44
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert Sevitz                           02/13/2001 05:11 PM

To: Scott Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Randy Pais/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Co-op City - Term Sheet

Scott

Term sheet for draft contract, as requested.


I talked to Rod he got me a time at 1:21 for Saturday. I'll play with my
buddies on Saturday. I would like to play with you and mom in Sunday. I'll
book a tee time if that is OK.

Chris


Please see the attached report.  Call me if you have any questions.

Mona Petrochko
Director, Government Affairs-The Americas
Ph:   415-782-7821
Fax:  415-782-7854
Pgr:  888-916-7188


Thanks.  I'll come by between 4:45 and 5:30.

Susan Pereira

"Boudreaux, Julie" <jkboud@swbell.net> on 05/07/2001 11:24:30 PM
To: Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Recognitions

That sounds fine.
Julie?
----- Original Message -----
From:  Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
To: jkboud@swbell.net
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: Recognitions

Julie-

Unfortunately, I will not be able to help you  sort recognitions during the
day on Tuesday -- I can't get off work on that  day.? If you are able to
sort our troop's recognitions (troop 12357)  by Tuesday evening, I would
love to come by and pick them up.? Our  last Brownie meeting is on Wednesday
afternoon, and I wanted to get  everything to our troop leader Wednesday
morning before work.? Let me  know what time would be convenient for me to
come by.? I have a  Southside Place city council meeting to attend at 7 pm
but could come by  before.....

Thanks,

Susan  Pereira


Dorie, as per our discussion.

For the Friday night speaker, can you give me an idea of price and
availability for the following:

 - Joe Gibbs
 - Lou Holtz
 - Mike Krzynewski
 - Joe Paterno
 - James Carville

The topic would be leadership and motivation.

Regards
Delainey


I would love to do that!!  And like I said, I realized I have every right to
go out with a friend (girl or boy) if I want to.  If he wants to be
insecure, then that's his problem.  Does your offer still stand??  If so,
when?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:48 AM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE: what doing?

Yeah tell me about it.  So the reason I called to see if you wanted to do
something last week was because I got a settlement on my some of my dads
insurance shit and I wanted to go out to a nice dinner.  I thought it would
be a nice opportunity for us to hang out and catch up.  I hope you don't
still think that I didn't want to see you that night because you are dating
dave, I just had to run some errands right when you called back.


Marcus Robinson was just telling me how much he likes his new digs compared
to TKC.  He loves Tijuana.

What kind of show are you running over there?

- THE MULLETS


After more years than I care to mention, I am leaving Enron tomorrow as part of the team that's going to AEP with the sale of Houston Pipe Line Company.

I just wanted to say thanks to as many people as I could remember that helped make the time at Enron pass so quickly.  It's been great working with you!!

Best wishes

Lee

p.s. My new email will be:	llpapayoti@aep.com


I wanted to reply, even though I have called recently.  Work has slowed down
a little bit, but will probably pick up in a week or two.  I have traded
calls with Kara the past two days, so I haven't talked to her in some time.
Anyway, I hope your figuring out where we should go for a trip this sping.
We will have to know whether Megan and I need to work on our golf games or
not.  We have been thinking maybe you guys are thinking about going to
Ireland or England to play some of the old courses of this world.  Or maybe
you have been thinking about going to Paris to visit the city of love.
Anyway, these are just some of the thinks we have been thinking about.  Talk
to you soon.
Love
Ben


Please try to track this down.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/14/2000
08:27 AM ---------------------------

RTellis@milbank.com on 01/13/2000 04:42:12 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: SHoward@milbank.com
Subject: RE: Status of "B" Notes.

Richard, we have located charts prepared by someone at ECT indicating that
ECT held on to 11,750 units of the "B" NSM notes.  The Offering Memorandum
indicates that ECT was to purchase 12,210 units of the B notes.  Thus, it
appears that some 500 units were "sold." We would like to discuss the charts
with Travis or Kevin (during the visit to Houston - if not before).

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard B Sanders [mailto:rsander@ect.enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 2:35 PM
To: RTellis@milbank.com
Subject: Re: Status of "B" Notes.

Have you received all the information you need?

RTellis@milbank.com on 12/20/99 02:23:11 PM

To:   Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Status of "B" Notes.

Just a reminder -- As discussed during our conference call this past Friday,
we are hoping to receive from you a chart or other documentation reflecting
what ECT did with the "B" NSM Notes that were purchased.  Thanks.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - att1.htm


Have you met Mark Powell from Canada?  You should make a serious effort to
get to know him since you are Mr Canada. He is here for 3-4 weeks more
learning about the Home Office.


Gentlemen,

Yesterday, Enron provided comments on the MOU which raise several new issues of substance. TransCanada & Westcoast recommend that these matters be deferred and included with our discussions on the commercial proposal and the Partnership Agreement, as we have agreed on a number of other issues.

As we discussed on Tuesday's conference call, we believe the first priority for ANNGTC is to finalize the MOU now, & put it "on ice", to permit all parties to obtain the required governance approvals by Nov. 15 - also the press release would be drafted, circulated & approved and ready to go at that time.

Secondly, the commercial proposal to ANS Producers must be initiated in early November to meet a mid-Dec. deadline. This proposal will of necessity have the group addressing the large commercial alternatives in order to establish a viable and attractive project.

We recommend a conference call on Monday @ 1:30 PM (Mountain time) to finalize the MOU - we will arrange a dial-in #.. Please provide your comments on the MOU to Murray & I today.

Tony

"Gadd, Eric" wrote:

> Please see the attached red-line with our comments.
>
> In paragraph 8, I've proposed new language to address that pre-existing
> residual claims must be satisfactorily addressed before a new
> partnership agreement would be executed.  Also, I've outlined the
> possibility for other forms of ownership than just a partnership.
>
> In paragraph 9, I've outlined a non-exhaustive list of issues to be
> addressed in the joint development and coordination agreement.
>
> During the next round of discussions following the MOU, I would like to
> explore the merits of rejoining partners having the right to rejoin as
> either a developing or non-developing party.  The outline structure I
> propose would be as follows-
> - In either case, ownership levels are as set out in the MOU
> - A developing party would have full voting rights and full financial
> responsibility during the development phase
> - A non-developing party would make MOU payments but otherwise not have
> voting rights or financial responsibility
> - A non-developing party could become a developing party at a specific
> time in the future and upon specific terms
> - Non-developing parties would agree to release their claims for AFUDC
> and interest to the extent commercially necessary
>
> Regards,
>
> Eric Gadd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Palmer [mailto:tony_palmer@transcanada.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:13 PM
> To: Steve Patrick; Bill Purcell; Peter Lund; Byron Wright; Gadd, Eric;
> Jim Moore; cavan carlton; brad reese; Steve Schroeder
> Cc: Murray Birch; Donna Friesen
> Subject: ANNGTC MOU
>
> Now that the collective letter is on its way, could I request that you
> please provide your comments on the MOU language Donna sent to you
> yesterday.
> Comments tomorrow AM would permit us to finalize this week.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tony
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                           Name: MOU Letters Oct 23 Enron.doc
>                                           Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
>    MOU Letters Oct 23 Enron.doc       Encoding: base64
>                                    Description: MOU Letters Oct 23 Enron.doc
>                                Download Status: Not downloaded with message


Enron Tiger Team:

Thank you for your input on project requests.  The breakout of projects is
as follows:

Team 1: Wholesale Trading
Team 2:  Impact of e-Commerce on Energy Markets
Team 3: Retail Business Applications

Any questions, please call the FAP office.

Good luck with your finals.  Have a wonderful Winter Break.

Sincerely,
Donna Piazze
Program Director
Field Application Project
The Wharton School
Univ. of Pennsylvania
(215) 573-8394
(215) 573-5727 fax
fap@management.wharton.upenn.edu
piazze@wharton.upenn.edu


Andy Edison at Enron knows about this. Please call him at 713-345-7105

	RTellis@milbank.com
	01/16/2001 04:01 PM

		 To: richard.b.sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Waste Management/Ecogas/GSF

Richard, trial is set in the Waste Management/Ecogas/GSF case for one month
from today.? I have been unable to gather any information from GSF's counsel
about settlement.? Plaintiff's counsel told me they have sent a demand to GSF
and are awaiting response.

Please let me know how you would like me to proceed. Do you have any
information on how the settlement discussion have been going?

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.


Seems like we should have a link from GRO site to this.  Is this part of
Brent's organization ?

http://globaltrade.enron.co.uk/


FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Horton, Stanley
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Hughes, James A.
Cc: Hayslett, Rod
Subject: RE: EGAS 4th Qtr

I think you may be reading more into this than was meant by the memo.  There are alot of business entities that roll-up into EGS.  There usually is some flexibility in each business unit regarding their quarterly numbers.  By having all the facts we as a team can present them to Causey.  We may very well be able to accelerate earnings in one group for a quarter to make up deficiencies in another group.  It would be nice to be able to discuss these options as a unit before reporting them to corporate.  No one is trying to manage anything other than to give Rick a complete assessment as to what EGS results look like and the fexibility we have as a unit.  This is all Tracy was trying to convey.  No one has asked that you not respond to corporate only that we have a chance to see what our numbers look like as an entity before releasing to corporate.  I don't think Rick has any problem with this but I will ask Rod by this memo to check with Rick to see if he does.

I think this is pretty consistent with the way wholesale and retail report to corporate.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hughes, James A.
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 7:52 AM
To: Horton, Stanley
Subject: FW: EGAS 4th Qtr

Stan:

I would like to discuss the below message when you have a chance.  There has been a lot of distrust and concern over "managed information" with respect to the international assets.  My team has overcome this by going out of our way to cooperate and be transparent with corp the last year and a half.  I am uncomfortable asking my people not to respond to corp requests for information.  I also think the tone of the message is demeaning and could have a morale impact on my folks.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Geaccone, Tracy
Sent: Tue 10/16/2001 11:28 AM
To: Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Lindsey, Mark E.; Schwarzbach, Stephen
Cc: Tran, Agatha; Hughes, James A.; Hayslett, Rod
Subject: RE: EGAS 4th Qtr

Please make sure your numbers go through me or Stan before we give them to Corp. Corp's request for these things should be coming through me in the future.   Rod and I are meeting with Stan on Monday, October 22.  We would like to discuss your 4th Q numbers then if possible.

Let me know.

Thanks

Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Sommers, Jeffrey E.
Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:18 AM
To:     Lindsey, Mark E.; Schwarzbach, Stephen
Cc:     Tran, Agatha; Hughes, James A.; Hayslett, Rod; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:        EGAS 4th Qtr

Mark,

In response to your voicemail this morning, this is EGAS 4th Qtr per the 2nd CE.  It has been adjusted to pull out the items that have been transferred out of EGAS since the 2nd CE  ( Azurix International and South America Merchant ) and the transfer in of European Assets and the Middle East.   This does NOT include EPower which I understand will be transferred from Europe to EGAS in the 4th Qtr.   We are currently working on our 3rd CE and will send you those numbers when we are done.

Sommers  << File: EGAS4thqtr.xls >>


Attached is a originally prepared by Kent describing two potential deal
structures to move 2002 income to 2001 and/or to take advantage of a
forecasted near-term drop in the forecasted strip price for 2002.  Kent is
anxious to get feedback on these structures as he would like to lock-in
prices yet this week if prices remain favorable...so timeliness is essential.

Dan Fancler and I have both reviewed Kent's write-up and our "accounting
considerations" have been included in the attached memo.

If you would like to discuss this with us, Kent has asked to be included in
the discussion.  Your comments will be appreciated:


It never ends.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2000 10:34
AM ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
02/25/2000 10:40 AM
To: Jay Webb/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: John Sherriff has asked if we can build autoconfirms into EOL

Can we start thinking about this?

Also Dave please chase Bryan again if we haven't received anything as John
spoke to Mark who said everything is ready?


TO: Gerald R. Nemec   FROM: Mark Whitney, TheLaw.net Corporation
HOMEPAGE: http://www.thelaw.net  REMOVE: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm

     Why, in the information age, do so many continue to pay so much to West
and Lexis? There is an excellent answer to this question. Enhancements.

--YOU OWN THE LAW

     West and Lexis do not own the law. You do. Your tax dollars already paid
for the raw data generated by governmental instrumentalities; data that West
and Lexis snags and enhances. Thereafter, your organization pays and pays for
a laundry list of enhancements intended to make this raw data more useful.

--THE VALUE OF ENHANCEMENTS

     In many cases these enhancements also lead to negative experiences such
as tedious training seminars, repeated calls to tech support, and an
overwhelming sense that for many bread and butter research and reference
tasks, there has to be a better, faster, easier, less expensive answer.
     Are all of these enhancements really worth 10 - 20 times the price of a
subscription to TheLaw.net, particularly when West and Lexis are available on
the web 24/7 whenever you really need them as long as you have a credit card?
How much would you otherwise pay per year for unlimited access to the U.S.
Supreme Court, the 13 Federal Circuits, the 50 state supreme courts and the
intermediate level appellate courts? Call you local rep and ask?

--THE NUMBER ONE ENHANCEMENT: SEARCHABLE CASE LAW

     In our opinion, the number one enhancement West and Lexis have to peddle
are their searchable case law databases. But we have one, too; the third
largest on earth next to theirs. With an annual subscription to TheLaw.net
Professional Convenience Edition you can search 24 hours a day for an entire
year, across more than 175 Federal and state appellate jurisdictions for just
$345 if you sign up by April 30, 2001. And we don't insult your intelligence
by slicing things up. Everybody gets everything we have on an unlimited use
basis. Is that a model you've been waiting for, or what?
     We even place browsable and searchable Federal and state statutes,
forms, rule, regs, courts, executive agency databases, legislative tracking
tools, news and reference desk resources, right where you want them; a mouse
click or two away on your desktop.

--CONSIDER OUR REFERENCES

     Why take our word for it? Consider our references and reviews, some of
which we've published to our web site. http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm

--THE THREE RULES OF OUR SUCCESS

      At TheLaw.net Corporation we have three simple rules:

----RULE ONE: Everyone gets everything we have.
----RULE TWO: Similarly situated subscribers always pay the same price.
----RULE THREE: Current prices are always out in the open on our web site:
--------$395 annually for you
--------$575 for you and a partner
--------$1195 for your five user workgroup
--------Enterprise Licenses are also available.
See, http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

     Imagine. No surprises. No meters. No printing, downloading or
pay-per-view fees. In short, none of the gamesmanship you have come to expect
from the big two compusearchers.

--CONSIDER OUR VISION: A FIRM FOUNDATION AT A LOW FLAT-RATE

     TheLaw.net, privately held and successful from Day One, represents the
next logical step; a big improvement over slogging through two billion web
pages and otherwise watching legal research costs spiral out of control at a
time when with normal free market principles at work, such costs would be
plummeting.
     In some instances, subscribers have found they no longer need to deal
with West or Lexis. In most instances they have found that the list of
expensive resources that they need to buy is much shorter. And we always
remind them that everything West and Lexis has is available pay-per-view, a
la carte, via the Internet. All you need is authorization from your client
and a credit card.

--SAVE $50 ON THELAW.NET PROFESSIONAL CONVENIENCE EDITION

     Subscribing to TheLaw.net is not a decision you need to overthink. An
individual annual subscription to TheLaw.net Convenience Edition is on sale
right now for just $345. It includes an unconditional 30-day money back
guarantee and you can install at work, at home and on your laptop.
     Stick your big toe in the water and see how good it feels. We already
know that 95% of our subscribers stay with us past the 30-day opt out period
and that 75% will begin adding TheLaw.net to additional desktops within 90
days.
     A lot has changed since you went to law school. One of the biggest
changes is that the days of two legal research behemoths calling all of the
shots and making all of the rules are over. The time is now to lose the
chains by subscribing to TheLaw.net Professional today. At your option, we
can build your package and deliver it today via our web site or we can ship
CDs via U.S. Priority Mail or FedEx. We thank you for your time and we hope
to hear from you soon.

Regards,

MARK WHITNEY
CEO/President, TheLaw.net Corporation
Chicago - San Diego, USA
Toll Free: 1.877.4.LAWNET (1.877.452.9638)
******************************************

CASE LAW DATABASE BULLETS
--Nearly 200 covered Federal and State jurisdictions are listed at the end of
this message.
--More than 4,000,000 cases, updated daily, thousands added every week.
--The year that coverage begins is noted below.
--Many jurisdictions are back-filed to the early 20th century.
--The official citation is included shortly after it becomes available.
--Search syntax options include natural language, Boolean, truncation and
nesting.
--Field search by party, counsel, court, date, docket number, official
citation, panel or author.
--Quickly research the history of a cite.
--See below for information regarding our January Software Sale, Volume
Licensing and applicable discounts for AALL and ACCA Members.
--No passwords, meters, slices, printing, downloading, viewing or transaction
hassles to contend with.
--MAC Users can run TheLaw.net with Virtual PC. FMI, see,
http://www.connectix.com/products/vpc.html

USEFUL LINKS:
--HOME PAGE: http://www.thelaw.net
--BROWSABLE LIST OF TOP 25 FAQs: http://www.thelaw.net/faqs.htm
-----Printer Friendly FAQ&As: http://www.thelaw.net/faqs/pfversion.htm
--SUBSCRIPTION TERMS AND CONDITIONS: http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm
--REFERENCES: http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm
--COMPARE TO THE BEHEMOTHS: http://www.thelaw.net/compare.htm
--SITE LICENSES: http://www.thelaw.net/enterprise.htm
--OVERVIEW: http://www.thelaw.net/overview.htm
--SOFTWARE: http://www.thelaw.net/software.htm
--CASE LAW: http://www.thelaw.net/caselaw.htm
--TUTORIALS: http://www.thelaw.net/searchdemo/home.htm
--STATUTES/CONSTITUTIONS: http://www.thelaw.net/statutes.htm
--RULES: http://www.thelaw.net/rules.htm
--ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: http://www.thelaw.net/admin.htm
--FORMS: http://www.thelaw.net/forms.htm
--COURTS: http://www.thelaw.net/courts.htm
--EXECUTIVE AGENCIES: http://www.thelaw.net/executive.htm
--LEGISLATURES: http://www.thelaw.net/legislatures.htm
--TOPICS/PRACTICE AREAS: http://www.thelaw.net/topics.htm
--BAR ASSOC./LEGAL ORGS.: http://www.thelaw.net/bars.htm
--NEWS: http://www.thelaw.net/news.htm
--REFERENCE DESK: http://www.thelaw.net/refdesk.htm

****APRIL PROMOTIONS*****

--CONVENIENCE EDITION ON SALE: Subscribe to TheLaw.net Pro Convenience
Edition for the same price as TheLaw.net Pro Personal Edition: just $345
annually, with the security of an unconditional 30 day money back guarantee.
You'll save $50 and you may install the Convenience Edition (at no extra
charge) at work, at home and on your laptop so that your libraries are
everywhere you are. For more information go to:
http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

--SMALL OFFICE SPECIAL: Buy one annual subscription to our Convenience
Edition at the regular price of $395 and get a second subscription for your
partner or paralegal for just $180.

--WORKGROUP EDITION: $1195 annually. A five seat license averaging less than
$20 a month per user. Add seats for just $195. Users install at work, at home
and on their laptop. AALL and ACCA Members Receive $100 Discount.

VOLUME LICENSING
--MICRO ENTERPRISE EDITION: 10 - 24 Attorneys; $175 per attorney, minimum of
10; Deduct $100 for any attorney who will not use case law; FREE to
librarians, paralegals, back office staff; all users may install at work, at
home and on their laptop

--SMALL ENTERPRISE EDITION: 25 - 74 Attorneys; $165 per attorney, minimum of
25; Deduct $100 for any attorney who will not use case law FREE to
librarians, paralegals, back office staff; all users may install at work, at
home and on their laptop

--MEDIUM ENTERPRISE EDITION: 75 - 149 Attorneys; $155 per attorney, minimum
of 75; Deduct $100 for any attorney who will not use case law; FREE to
librarians, paralegals, back office staff; all users may install at work, at
home and on their laptop

--LARGE ENTERPRISE EDITION: 150 - 299 Attorneys; $145 per attorney, minimum
of 150; Deduct $100 for any attorney who will not use case law; FREE to
librarians, paralegals, back office staff; all users may install at work, at
home and on their laptop

--MACRO ENTERPRISE EDITION: 300+ Attorneys; $135 per attorney, minimum of
300; Deduct $100 for any attorney who will not use case law; FREE to
librarians, paralegals, back office staff; all users may install at work, at
home and on their laptop

CASES INCLUDED IN THE DATABASE AND YEAR OF ORIGIN
-----Sorted in Order of Federal Circuit
---------See also, http://www.thelaw.net/compare.htm

--United States Supreme Court 1900
--Federal Circuit 1982
--U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit 1950

FIRST FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit 1930
--Maine Supreme Judicial Court 1996
--Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court 1930
--Massachusetts Appeals Court 1930
--New Hampshire Supreme Court 1930
--Rhode Island Supreme Court 1950

SECOND FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit 1930
--Connecticut Supreme Court 1950
--Connecticut Appellate Court 1950
--New York Court of Appeals 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 1st Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 2nd Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 3rd Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Div. 4th Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term 1st Dept. 1955
--New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term 2nd Dept. 1955
--Vermont Supreme Court 1930

THIRD FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit 1930
--U.S. District Court, New Jersey 1999
--New Jersey Supreme Court 1930
--New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division 1930
--U.S. District Court, Eastern, Pennsylvania 1997
--Pennsylvania Supreme Court 1950
--Pennsylvania Superior Court 1950
--Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court 1950

FOURTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 1930
--U.S. District Court, Maryland 1999
--Maryland Court of Appeals 1950
--Maryland Special Court of Appeals 1950
--North Carolina Supreme Court 1945
--North Carolina Court of Appeals 1968
--U.S. District Court, South Carolina 1999
--South Carolina Supreme Court 1996
--South Carolina Court of Appeals 1996
--Virginia Supreme Court 1930
--Virginia Court of Appeals 1930
--West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals 1991

FIFTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 1930
--Louisiana Supreme Court 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit 1980
--Louisiana Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 1980
--U.S. District Court, Northern, Mississippi 1997
--Mississippi Supreme Court 1994
--Mississippi Court of Appeals 1994
--Texas Supreme Court 1950
--Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District 1950
--Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District 1950

SIXTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 1930
--Kentucky Supreme Court 1945
--Kentucky Court of Appeals 1945
--Michigan Supreme Court 1930
--Michigan Court of Appeals 1965
--Ohio Supreme Court 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 1st District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 4th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 5th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 6th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 7th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 9th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District 1950
--Ohio Court of Appeals, 12th District 1950
--Tennessee Supreme Court 1950
--Tennessee Court of Appeals, Middle Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Appeals, Eastern Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Appeals, Western Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Middle Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Eastern Grand Division 1950
--Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Western Grand Division 1950

SEVENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit 1930
--Illinois Supreme Court 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District 1985
--Illinois Appellate Court, 5th District 1985
--Indiana Supreme Court 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 1st District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 2nd District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 3rd District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 4th District 1940
--Indiana Court of Appeals, 5th District 1940
--Indiana Tax Court 1986
--Wisconsin Supreme Court 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III 1945
--Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV 1945

EIGHTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit 1930
--Arkansas Supreme Court 1957
--Arkansas Court of Appeals 1957
--Iowa Supreme Court 1995
--Iowa Court of Appeals 1995
--Minnesota Supreme Court 1930
--Minnesota Court of Appeals 1983
--Missouri Supreme Court 1960
--Missouri Court of Appeals 1960
--Nebraska Supreme Court 1965
--Nebraska Court of Appeals 1965
--U.S. District Court, North Dakota 1999
--North Dakota Supreme Court 1930
--North Dakota Court of Appeals 1930
--South Dakota Supreme Court 1965

NINTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 1941
--Alaska Supreme Court 1960
--Alaska Court of Appeals 1960
--Arizona Supreme Court 1930
--Arizona Court of Appeals, 1st Division 1930
--Arizona Court of Appeals, 2nd Division 1930
--U.S. District Court, Central, California 1998
--California Supreme Court 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate District 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 3rd Appellate District 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate District 1930
--California Court of Appeal, 6th Appellate District 1930
--Hawaii Supreme Court 1930
--Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals 1930
--Idaho Supreme Court 1965
--Idaho Court of Appeals 1965
--Montana Supreme Court 1993
--Nevada Supreme Court 1950
--Oregon Supreme Court 1950
--Oregon Court of Appeals 1950
--Washington Supreme Court 1935
--Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division 1969
--Washington Court of Appeals, 2nd Division 1969
--Washington Court of Appeals, 3rd Division 1969

TENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit 1930
--Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
--Colorado Supreme Court 1930
--Colorado Court of Appeals 1930
--Kansas Supreme Court 1982
--Kansas Court of Appeals 1982
--New Mexico Supreme Court 1930
--New Mexico Court of Appeals 1930
--Oklahoma Supreme Court 1994
--Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals 1994
--Oklahoma Court of Appeals 1994
--Utah Supreme Court 1950
--Utah Court of Appeals 1950
--Wyoming Supreme Court 1993

ELEVENTH FEDERAL CIRCUIT
--U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit 1981
--Alabama Supreme Court 1955
--Alabama Court of Civil Appeals 1955
--Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals 1955
--Florida Supreme Court 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 1st District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 2nd District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 3rd District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 4th District 1950
--Florida District Court of Appeal, 5th District 1950
--Georgia Supreme Court 1940
--Georgia Court of Appeals 1940

****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the
fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy
professionals. But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to
remove themselves easily and at no cost. Simply go to:
http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the
email address that you would like removed in the subject line OR call toll
free 1.877.452.9638. See also: http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy
Statement".
*****************************************************************

West is a registered trademark of West Group. Lexis is a registered trademark
of LEXIS-NEXIS, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.


Dear Derivatives Week subscriber:

Catch the latest breaking news in this week's issue by clicking
here: http://www.derivativesweek.com

Top stories this week:
_________________________
CARBON DIOXIDE MARKET FINDS POSSIBLE NEW PLAYER
A potential major liquidity provider is looking at the carbon dioxide
emissions credits markets. Find out who, and why it may not be
premature to take a hard look at this mart.

CANADIAN FINANCE GIANT LOOKS TO INCREASE CREDIT DERIVATIVES USE
In this week's issue, find out who is looking to substantially increase their
credit
derivatives investment, and why.

BANKRUPTCY HEARINGS CAST LONG SHADOW OVER CHINESE MARKET
Outstanding over-the-counter derivatives are increasingly likely not to be
honored
in the liquidation of Guangdong International Trust & Investment Corp. See
what
this could mean for derivatives trading in China in this week's issue.
_________________________

As a DW subscriber, you are eligible for complimentary access to the
Subscribers Only area of the <www.derivativesweek.com> site, which
contains the current issue and a searchable archive of all past issues.
Use your User ID and Password to access the entire site. If you don't
have these yet, hit 'REPLY' to this email, fill out the proper information
below, and send it back to me. I'll get you set up right away!

===============================

Newsletter Title:
My name is:
My company is:
My city location is:

I choose my new user name to be:
I choose my new password to be:

===============================
?
If you'd prefer, call our Customer Service Department at 212-224-3800
and give them the information above.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
YOUR USER NAME AND PASSWORD ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL
USE ONLY.? THEY MAY NOT BE SHARED WITH ANYONE AND
NO ONE ELSE SHOULD ACCESS THE SITE WITH YOUR USER NAME
AND PASSWORD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please do not hesitate
to call me at 1-212-224-3034.

Thanks and enjoy this week's issue.

Jim Beecher
Publisher

NOTE: You will receive weekly updates of the hottest stories in
Derivatives Week. These are not random mass mailings but
rather one-time messages for your personal attention. If you do
not wish to continue to receive these notices, please click 'reply',
type 'remove' and enter your name and company. You will then
be removed from our email database.


This FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2000 (5:00 p.m. CST) is the deadline for deferral
program enrollment.  Following the deadline, no new elections or changes to
existing elections will be accepted.
To learn more about your deferral program opportunities and to enroll for
2001 deferrals, access eHRonline at http://ehronline.enron.com.  (Call the
ISC Help Desk at 713-345-4727 if you need your ID or password to access the
system.)

1. Review the program descriptions (attached to the Election Form) before you
make your elections.
2. If you decide to defer compensation, complete the Election Form before
Friday, December 8,  2000, 5:00 p.m. CST (the enrollment deadline).
3. Print your 2001 Election Form and Confirmation Statement right from the
web site and you,re   finished!

DEFERRAL ENROLLMENT 2001--ADDED VALUE FOR YOUR FUTURE


Is Kathy the right contact?  Or should it be Brian?

Let's talk about changing the Canadian reporting relationships - especially risk.  I think that I will propose that to Lavorato today.  But let's talk first.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Port, David
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:56 AM
To:	Beck, Sally
Cc:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW:

FYI - this is out there as a possible reason why Americas VaR did not come down to within limits as we expected.
In the absence of a fix it looks as though we have another VaR violation.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:36 AM
To:	Port, David
Subject:	FW:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:12 AM
To:	Reeves, Kathy
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Davenport, Lacrecia; Khanna, Bharat; Victorio, Tom
Subject:

Kathy,
It looks like the Canadian positions didn't hit VAR last night.  Can you re-check?
Also, I understand Zufferli bot a ton of NG and I thought he was short? (Why is system showing he is long?)

Frank

EFF_DT	PORTFOLIO_ID	COMMODITY_CD	SumOfDELTA_POSITION
11/23/2001	J_ZUFFERLI	NG	8241559.1328
11/26/2001	J_ZUFFERLI	NG	8568832.813

EFF_DT	PORTFOLIO_ID	COMMODITY_CD	SumOfDELTA_POSITION
11/23/2001	CANADA-PWR-BU	NG	8298324.949
11/26/2001	CANADA-PWR-BU	NG	8691997.5495

EFF_DT	PORTFOLIO_ID	COMMODITY_CD	SumOfDELTA_POSITION
11/23/2001	CANADA_PWR_GAS	NG	8298324.949
11/26/2001	CANADA_PWR_GAS	NG	8691997.5495


More.......


Now you can enjoy the benefits of convenient online ordering and home
delivery for medications that you take on an ongoing basis - even if
you currently fill these prescriptions at your local retail pharmacy.

Recent enhancements to merckmedco.com now make it even easier for you
to see which of your prescriptions can be filled through Merck-Medco's
Home Delivery Pharmacy.

When you choose to refill a prescription through home delivery, you can:
* Enjoy at-home prescription delivery and the convenience of online
  ordering anytime, from any computer with Internet access.
* Receive a larger days' supply of medication -- usually up to 90
  days -- which saves you trips to the drugstore and in some cases,
  saves you money.
* Check prescription order status, pricing and coverage online.
* Receive e-mails notifying you of your prescription order status.

To see which prescriptions may be eligible for home delivery, simply:
* Click on this link or copy it into your browser window:
  https://host1.merck-medco.com/cgi-bin/Br.cgi?-PW-MyRxRtTb
* Then log in using your email address and password.
* After you click on the "login" button, you'll be presented with our
  "Retail Prescriptions" area, where you can see a detailed history of
  recent prescriptions you filled at a retail pharmacy.

Any medication with a little blue house next to it indicates that the
prescription is eligible for home delivery. When you click on the blue
house, you can compare your current co-payment with the savings you would
receive if you choose home delivery.  If you decide that you would like
to take advantage of home delivery savings, we contact your healthcare
provider and keep you informed every step of the way via e-mail.

merckmedco.com has many ways to help you get the most out of your
prescription drug benefit.  So visit us today and see for yourself!

For AOL Users:
Merck-Medco My Retail Prescriptions

When you registered with merckmedco.com, you indicated that you would
like to receive e-mail notices about new web site features, as well as
important messages about your plan benefit, prescriptions and other
pharmacy benefit features. Should you wish to discontinue this service,
please follow this link:
https://host1.merck-medco.com/cgi-bin/Rb_home.cgi?-Q-OTC2000A08
and log in and then update your personal preferences by choosing the
"My Profile" option from the bottom menu bar.

For AOL Users:
Merck-Medco Homepage

                  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
This e-mail contains confidential information from Merck-Medco and is
intended solely for the use of the individual named on this transmission.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing,
copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of
this information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient of this e-mail, to prevent future transmissions like this,
please notify Merck-Medco by forwarding this e-mail to the following
address: website@merckmedco.com.


go to MSN Home  	MSN Promotion Alert

[IMAGE]MSN Exclusive: Thanksgiving bouquet, just $29.99
 [IMAGE]   Send Thanksgiving roses at a bargain price  [IMAGE]      In this offer exclusive to MSN
, Proflowers.com will send a beautiful Thanksgiving bouquet anywhere in the U.S. for just $29.99 (a $49.99 value) plus shipping. Let your loved ones know you're thinking about them, or use it to adorn your own table. The arrangement includes a dozen fresh-cut, long-stemmed Terra Cotta and Gold roses accented with yellow aster. Order your bouquet now !  [IMAGE]  Xbox a day giveaway MSN Shopping and Xbox.com are giving away an Xbox? a day for the holidays. Each day through December 12, they'll be giving away a copy of the most powerful game system ever. Give an Xbox this holiday season! (Or keep it for yourself.) Click here to enter .  (U.S. only)* Win a trip to see Britney Spears See Britney Spears perform her new hit "I'm a Slave 4 U" in her own 'hood. Enter to win the MSN Music Go Home With Britney sweepstakes where the grand prize winner will receive a 3-day trip for two to Britney's home state of Louisiana, including airfare to New Orleans, hotel, car rental, tickets to Britney's December 16 concert, and passes to the pre-show soundcheck party. Don't miss out - enter now !  (U.S. and Canada only)**  * Open to residents of the U.S. 18 years and older. Sweepstakes ends Dec. 12, 2001. For complete rules, see site.  ** Open to residents of the U.S. and Canada (except Quebec) 13 years and older. Sweepstakes ends Dec. 1, 2001. For complete rules, see site.
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]	UNSUBSCRIBE 	MORE NEWSLETTERS 	FEEDBACK 	HELP 	[IMAGE]
					To unsubscribe, reply to this email with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.

[IMAGE]

  	 go to MSN Home  More Useful Everyday MSN Home  | My MSN  | Hotmail  | Search  | Shopping  | Money  | People & Chat
	?2001 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use   Advertise   TRUSTe Approved Privacy Statement   GetNetWise


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/18/2001 04:31
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           05/18/2001 04:31 PM

To: John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Ameresco

The attached revised CA was sent to Doug Barba:


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001 11:33 AM -----

	Mark Breese
	03/16/2001 05:10 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:


Hi Gerry,

Enron is a great place for an engineer to work in a non-technical position.
In fact, I work with reformed engineers daily, in various capacities.

Enron has an analyst program for college graduates, where the analysts go
through six month rotations in various parts of the business. In addition,
there is a good job search feature on Enron's website.  If you see something
that looks promising, I'll check things out around here to see if I can get
the inside scoop.

FYI, Enron North America, Enron Broadband, and Enron Energy Services are good
choices.  ENA is the old Enron Capital & Trade, so it is the real heart of
Enron (yes, it is where I now work).  Enron is also focusing on industrial
development (paper, steel, and who knows what else). I don't suggest EECC.

Hope to see you soon,

Kay


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001 08:46 AM -----

	Shieldsenron@aol.com
	07/05/2001 06:35 PM

		 To: susan.j.mara@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reminder letter for California filing deadline

 - mara.rl.ca.7-5-01.doc


Dear Don,  Although baseball season is over, crowds in the thousands are expected at Enron Field, home of the Houston Astros, on Friday. A job fair for displaced Enron employees will be held at the stadium.  ENL's Houston bureau will be there to speak with former employees about Enron's collapse.   Houston Bureau Chief Myra Jolivet says other businesses are feeling the effects of the fall of Enron.  On Friday, the bureau will speak with analysts about the economic ramifications.   The Big 5 Accounting firms plan to improve financial reporting and auditing following Enron's demise.  On Friday from the NASDAQ, AccountingMalpractice.com CEO Mark Cheffers will discuss the dos and don'ts for firms.  Catch Cheffers during the 2:00 p.m. ET newscast tomorrow. The Washington bureau will have the latest on the Congressional investigation of Enron on Friday.  The Senate Commerce Committee announced Thursday that it will hold a hearing next Tuesday.  The list of witnesses is still being determined.   The debate over electricity restructuring continues in our nation's capital and the Washington bureau says we'll have more reaction on Friday.  Electric Power Supply Association's Gene Peters will join us from the Washington bureau during the 11:00 a.m. ET newscast with EPSA's take on the issue.     From space shuttles to hog farms - West Coast Correspondent Kym McNicholas talks to UTC Fuel Cells Commercial Power Systems Director Brian McDonald about his company's decision to shift gears.   Also from the West Coast bureau on Friday, Pratt & Whitney President Ellen Smith talks with Kym about applying flight technology to power plants to make them more efficient.   Finally, Kym talks with ALSTOM President and CEO Mike Barnoski.  Barnoski talks about the best market for power at a time when the supply and demand scenario is somewhat bearish. Catch these interviews from the West Coast bureau on Friday.    Closing Prices for Thursday, Dec. 13, 2001    Crude: $18.12/bbl -$0.24   Unleaded: $0.5208/gallon +$0.0036   Heating Oil: $0.5104/gallon +$0.0046   Gas: $2.756/mmBtu +$0.037   We'll be talking about Master Limited Partnerships on Friday with RBC Capital Markets CFA Mark Easterbrook.  Easterbrook will join us from Dallas during the noon ET newscast.      Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice. Occasionally guests have to cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Be sure to watch our newscasts every business day - 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, at the top of each hour.

	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap Video Windows Media Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  Real Player: 56K  | 100K  | 300K  (Requires Windows Media Player or Real Player )   Experience all that Williams Energy News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue, subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter, unsubscribe now    If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


pls print.  thanks. dF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 12/21/99 03:37
PM ---------------------------

Eileen Peebles
12/20/99 05:24 PM
To: Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jo
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: captive recap

attached is the file with the captive/non captive breakout of field and
market with seasonal splits.  also included is the top 2 markets of each
segment.


Group,

For those on night and day shift on Saturday/Sunday the emergency back-up generators will be tested. The testing will occur from 5 AM to 10 AM on Sunday morning. Dave Steiner has assured me that RT will be unaffected and Dave will be on hand to help if anything is needed. I think we should work to have everything submitted early to the CISO, tags made, etc. At least for HE 6, HE 7 and HE 8. This should give us some extra time if something goes wrong when they switch to the back-up power.

Bill


Steve:

I'll toot my horn on this one.  The speeches we have been doing for Ken
ranging from corporate culture to getting markets open are doing what they
are supposed to do.

On another matter, I cast my vote for a "knowledge manager" to replace
Margaret.  If I had a full time position instead of a rotating analyst, this
person could maybe double up and gain the institutional knowledge that
Margaret accumulated.  I think Rita Hartfield would be good in this position
and would work well with Joan and me.  I would also expect Rita to work
efficiently on a variety of hot issues--including writing which she is
proficient at.

- Rob

----- Forwarded by Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2001 12:22 PM -----

	Aleck Dadson@ECT
	04/05/2001 10:13 AM

		 To: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Article: Enron calls on Ontario to open power market quickly

Rob, the speech could not have gone better.  It was published as an op-ed
this morning by one of the two majors.  Thanks for all your help and your
very very useful advice re the structure and content of  Ken Lay's remarks.

	Ursula Brenner@ENRON
	04/04/2001 05:43 PM

		 To: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Article: Enron calls on Ontario to open power market quickly

Rob Bradley asked me to forward this article to you.

Ursula Brenner

Enron calls on Ontario to open power market quickly
April 04, 2001 12:36:00 PM ET
By Scott Anderson
TORONTO, April 4 (Reuters) - Enron Corp. (ENE), North America's biggest buyer
and seller of natural gas and electricity, put pressure on the Ontario
government on Wednesday to deregulate the provincial energy market, Canada's
biggest, as quickly as possible.
Ontario has already pushed back its previous deadline of November 2000 by one
year to sort out its deregulation problems and avoid the problems encountered
by California in energy deregulation.
The delays have frustrated potential corporate players.
"We think the right thing for Ontario is to move ahead with this plan, open
the markets and get them working," Kenneth Lay, Enron's chairman, said at a
breakfast speech at the Toronto Board of Trade.
"Let people start building the new power plants and, of course, providing a
lot of the types of services we provide elsewhere."
Lay warned that the longer the government drags its feet on the issue, the
more it places itself at risk of scaring off potential investors.
"The delays continue to create uncertainty and uncertainty tends to
discourage investment," Lay told reporters. "By discouraging investment, as
the market keeps growing, it could be that Ontario is going to have a tough
time keeping up with the needs of the economy."
Enron plans to build a $250-million generating plant near the southwestern
Ontario town of Sarnia, but has delayed the project until Ontario sets a firm
date for deregulation.
Lay said Enron is "committed to Ontario" even though other companies have
said they will move to other jurisdictions if the government does not open up
the market by the fall.
He said Ontario is far better prepared for deregulation than was California.
"I think what California shows is that if you're going to do it, you've got
to do it right. And California did it wrong," he told reporters.
"Increasingly politicians are understanding that. You can't deregulate half
the market, but not the other half. You can't set up a system that does not
allow price signals to be sent to consumers and even after prices go up, you
can't just keep shielding consumers from price signals and get no response."
Power demand from California's industries and 32 million residents has
increased dramatically, but the state has not seen any new generating
capacity added in about 10 years. The crisis there has been blamed on
California's own 1996 power deregulation law, which required utilities to buy
energy on the spot market, where prices have skyrocketed, but maintained caps
on the rates they could charge consumers. The problem was then compounded by
California's own surging demand, resulting in the rolling blackouts and
voluntary power cutbacks of the past months.
, 2001 Reuters


The apples and apple pie sound great.  And you made with mom & dad.
Everyone probably pitched in, right?  Sounds American as...

That's scary about Annie- I guess she is OK now.

I want the huckles - I would have made a sauce with them like I was going to
do last time (but you guys forgot and made other plans with Tom & Karen).

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From:  jdasovic@enron.com [mailto:jdasovic@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 11:57 AM
To: cameron@perfect.com
Subject: RE:

dome was cool.  studied, got some shit cleaned up (cut up logs, torn down
deck, etc.), picked lots of apples from my trees!  they're so good.  made
to apple pies with your folks last nite.  one's at your house--apples, too.
picked some killer huckles--gave them to your mom.  dove for
abalone---water was HORRIBLE, though.  ate it last nite.  one in your
refrigerator.  got killed in the pool.  annie ate rat poison, had to drive
to S.R. sunday nite; got back about midnight.  you know, same ol' shit.
you?

Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com> on 09/05/2000 01:39:44 PM

To:   "'jdasovic@enron.com'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE:

I did not hear about the announcement - please send!!

C1 is doing a demo integration with us.  We are having a hard time getting
a
booth at their conference, but at least we will be able to announce a loose
partnership with them.

We meet with Ariba tomorrow.

How was the dome?  San Diego was beautiful!

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From:     jdasovic@enron.com [mailto:jdasovic@enron.com]
Sent:     Tuesday, September 05, 2000 9:10 AM
To:  cameron@perfect.com
Subject:  Re:

did they bite (i.e., commerce one)?  i'm very excited.  you hear about the
announcement this AM re: Ariba/IBM hooking up with Microsoft to create B2B
software?

Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com> on 09/02/2000 08:59:45 PM

To:   "'Jeff Dasovich '" <jdasovic@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

 Well what?

Did you have a good time at the dome??

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich
To: cameron@perfect.com
Sent: 00/09/01 13:20

well?


[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]					Showtimes starting Friday, November 9, 2001, near  ZIP code 77005 To receive showtimes for a ZIP  code different from 77005 in future e-mails,  click here . 	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 	 [IMAGE] Now Playing: Monsters, Inc.  Monsters, Inc.   GBilly Crystal, John Goodman    It's just a day in the life of regular guys Mike and Sulley, hard-working citizens of  Monstropolis, a monster world that exists behind closet doors--where no children are  allowed. A breach in security, however, turns the city on its ear when  Sulley accidentally lets in a little human girl, and chaos runs rampant. Get a  dose of a different kind of nine-to-five in  Monsters, Inc. , the new animated comedy from  the makers of Toy Story. It's the monster hit of the  season! Here's what critics are saying:   [IMAGE]".  . . a breathlessly entertaining comedy that offers adults as much as it does kids."  --Andrew Johnston, US Weekly   [IMAGE]"The  guys at Pixar are geniuses, and what is incredible about them, they get the  technical things, yet they don't forget to be entertaining." --Leonard Maltin,  Hot Ticket  [IMAGE]Read  Amazon.com customer reviews  for Monsters,  Inc.   [IMAGE]Visit  our  Monsters, Inc. Store  for books, a trailer,  photos, and more   	 			[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	 		Showtimes for Monsters,  Inc.   Meyerland Cinema 8  (Entertainment Film Works)  100 Meyerland Plaza, Houston, TX 77096, 713-666-5244 Showtimes:  12:15pm | 1:00pm | 2:30pm |  3:15pm | 4:45pm | 5:30pm | 7:00pm | 7:45pm | 9:15pm | 10:00pm 	 Viewer Favorites   Updated Weekly   cover  Monsters,  Inc.   K-PAX   Mulholland  Drive   Serendipity   From  Hell    Go!Complete  list        Muggles, Rejoice! [IMAGE] Save up to 30% on selected books and more in our  Harry  Potter Store .    	 	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]					  Films Opening This Week:   The Heist  RGene Hackman, Rebecca Pidgeon  [IMAGE]See  Showtimes and more    Shallow Hal  PG-13Gwyneth Paltrow, Jack Black  [IMAGE]See  Showtimes and more      	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]					 Now Playing in Theaters near ZIP Code 77005  Please note:  These showtimes start on Friday, November 9, 2001.  To receive showtimes for a ZIP  Code different from 77005 in future e-mails,  click here .  	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]					   | Greenway Theatre  | Meyerland Cinema 8  | River Oaks Theatre  |   	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]					      1.   Greenway Theatre  (Landmark)  5 Greenway Plaza #c-400, Houston, TX 77046, 713-626-0402     Bread  and Tulips    PG-13Licia Maglietta, Bruno Ganz   Showtimes:  12:15pm | 2:40pm | 5:15pm |  7:30pm | 9:50pm    Innocence    Unrated Julia Blake, Charles 'Bud' Tingwell   Showtimes:  12:00pm | 2:15pm | 5:00pm |  7:20pm | 9:30pm      Va  savoir - Who Knows?    PG-13Jeanne Balibar, Sergio Castellitto   Showtimes:  12:30pm | 4:00pm | 7:00pm |  10:00pm       Return to  Top     2.   Meyerland Cinema 8  (Entertainment Film Works)  100 Meyerland Plaza, Houston, TX 77096, 713-666-5244     13  Ghosts    RTony Shalhoub, Shannon Elizabeth   Showtimes:  1:15pm | 3:30pm | 5:45pm |  8:00pm | 10:15pm    Bandits    PG-13Bruce Willis, Billy Bob Thornton   Showtimes:  12:00pm | 4:45pm | 9:30pm      From  Hell    RJohnny Depp, Heather Graham   Showtimes:  1:40pm | 4:25pm | 7:10pm |  9:50pm    The  Heist    RGene Hackman, Rebecca Pidgeon   Showtimes:  11:50am | 2:20pm | 5:00pm |  7:35pm | 10:05pm      K-PAX    PG-13Kevin Spacey, Jeff Bridges   Showtimes:  11:40am | 2:15pm | 4:55pm |  7:40pm | 10:15pm    Monsters,  Inc.    GBilly Crystal, John Goodman   Showtimes:  12:15pm | 1:00pm | 2:30pm |  3:15pm | 4:45pm | 5:30pm | 7:00pm | 7:45pm | 9:15pm | 10:00pm      Serendipity    PG-13John Cusack, Kate Beckinsale   Showtimes:  2:45pm | 7:20pm    Training  Day    RDenzel Washington, Ethan Hawke   Showtimes:  11:45am | 2:10pm | 4:45pm |  7:30pm | 10:15pm     Return to  Top     3.   River Oaks Theatre  (Landmark)  2009 West Gray, Houston, TX 77019, 713-524-2175     Amelie    RAudrey Tautou, Mathieu Kassovitz   Showtimes:  12:30pm | 4:00pm | 7:00pm |  9:30pm    The  Man Who Wasn't There    RBilly Bob Thornton, Frances McDormand   Showtimes:  1:00pm | 4:30pm | 7:15pm |  9:50pm      Mulholland  Drive    RJustin Theroux, Laura Harring   Showtimes:  12:45pm | 3:45pm | 6:45pm |  9:40pm       	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]					Return to  Top     We hope you enjoyed receiving this newsletter. However, if you'd like to unsubscribe, please use the link below or  click the Your Account button in the top right corner of any page on the  Amazon.com Web site. Under the E-mail and Subscriptions heading, click the "Manage  your Weekly Movie Showtimes e-mail" link.   http://www.amazon.com/movies-email  Copyright 2001 Amazon.com, Inc. All rights reserved.   You may also change your communication preferences by clicking the following link:   http://www.amazon.com/communications   	[IMAGE]


The problem reported earlier with Terminal Server 2 and Enpower's Curve Manager have been fixed.

Michael Tully
Application Support, Portland
(503)464-7790 Desk
(503)807-7862
michael.tully@enron.com


Thank you for your continued support and co-operation. I completely agree
with your comments.

I will be in touch as soon as I locate a venue and if the dates change.

Kind regards

Andreas

----- Original Message -----
From: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: <andreas.simou@garp.com>; <VKaminski@aol.com>; <vkamins@enron.com>;
<MTWilliams@edisonmission.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:23 PM
Subject: RE: GARP 2002 Convention

>
> Andreas,
>
> I agree with other speakers: we should go ahead with the Convention for
> many reasons. The best
> reason is to show defiance and to demonstrate that we shall not be
> intimidated.
>
> I shall contact Mark regarding the workshop and will send you the
> information you requested in another message.
>
> Vince
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Andreas Simou" <andreas.simou@garp.com>@ENRON
>
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Andreas+20Simou+22+20+3Candreas+2Esimou+40garp+2Ecom+3
E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:51 AM
>    To:     VKaminski@aol.com; vkamins@enron.com; Mark Williams
>    Subject:  GARP 2002 Convention
>
>
>    Dear Vince and Mark
>
>    Further to my voicemail, I am writing concerning  the GARP 2002
>    Convention. I hope that both of you, your friends and family  are okay
>    and safe. Along with other professionals in the financial industry, my
>    colleagues and I at GARP, have been affected by this tragedy.
>
>    I have had an opportunity to speak to the vast  number of 2002
>    Convention speakers since yesterday and the overwhelming response  has
>    been to proceed with the Convention. Indeed, there seems to be a
>    determined  effort not to let what happened last week bring the
>    financial world to a  standstill. I also believe that this is a time
>    that NY requires all the support  it can get, both emotionally and
>    financially. As such, I am searching for  new venues within Manhattan,
>    but this is a very difficult task, as you can  imagine. As soon as I
>    have any news about venue and possible change of dates I  will be in
>    touch.
>
>    Barring any unforeseen events or meetings, I would  like to know
whether
>    you can confirm that you will still be taking part as a  speaker at the
>    GARP 2002 Convention? I, and a great number of financial risk
>    professionals that I have mentioned the workshop to, are still very
keen
>    to have  you there. As such, I would very much like to have the energy
>    risk management  agenda in the next few days.
>
>    Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have  any questions or
>    queries. I look forward to your  response and hope that you are able to
>    join us and your peers at GARP  2002.
>
>    Kind regards
>
>    Andreas
>
>    ______________________
>    Andreas  Simou
>    Conference Director, GARP
>    Tel: +44 (0)20 7626 9301
>    Fax: +44 (0)20  7626 9900www.garp.com << File: http://www.garp.com >>
>
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Tana:

The following CPs are not authorized to trade US power products:

EEX Corporation - restricted by credit
Town of Braintree - trades through Braintree Power and Light
Vastar Resources, Inc. - not a current CP/not FERC approved

**********************

If Town of Braintree calls us about their power access, I'll talk to them --
I don't expect any comment, though.

Leslie


Yes, these are two separate, but identical deals. Thanks for double-checking.

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   01/22/2001 02:20 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Mark Fischer inquiry

Kate-
Can you verify with Mark that there were two identical trades done on Jan 8,
2001

Enron Sells Southern California Edison
100 mws
sp-15
165.00
jan 10-31, 2001

We received an executed confirmation letter from the cp but the deal number
is not avaliable (the fax machine cut off the deal number)  {just collecting
all the confirms for the California situation.}

the deal numbers I have located are 492137.01, 492152.01
Just making sure  one is not a duplicate.
Thanks


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	New Accounting System Mtg w/Shelley, Lisa, Sheila, Lynn, Ray Valpone, R Fugel, L Hill - 4102

Date:		5/8/2001
Time:		3:00 PM - 4:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Shirley,

Please schedule an interview with Konstantin on May 8.

Stinson, Zimin, Alex, Tanya, Krishna, myself.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 03:07 PM ---------------------------

"Konstantin N. Kudin" <kostya@rice.edu> on 05/02/2001 01:39:15 PM
To:	<Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	An interview

 Dear Dr. Kaminski

 We have talked earlier during your energy class at Rice about career
opportunities in risk management at Enron. If it is possible, I would like
to meet with you and people from your group next week, preferably Tuesday
(May 8). My time is flexible, I could come any time. Other days are also
fine.

 Thank you very much in advance.

 Sincerely,
 Konstantin Kudin


I went ahead and set aside some time on your calendar on the 10th to discuss
Triple Lutz.  Hope you are having a good day.

Dave
---------------------- Forwarded by David Baumbach/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000
08:21 AM ---------------------------

Laura Harder@ENRON
11/02/2000 01:15 PM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meeting

Schwieger is going to be at that Executive Impace & Influence Program the 8th
& 9th ... Tom will be there the 6th & 7th.  How about the 10th??


I made an egregious error in reading the web site.? Their dinners START at
6:30 - he said it would be ok to move it to 7 but no later than that.? Sorry
about the confusion - it was my error - so please plan your day accordingly.?
Many thanks and apologies!!

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


your choice of anderson or watters   and  taylor


yeah i will be in town this weekend.  i have something to go to fri but i will definately be out on saturday.  what are you doing?


For those of you interested in obtaining tickets for opening night (tonight!)
at PGE Park, please e-mail me by 3 PM today.

Who: Portland Beavers vs. Fresno Grizzlies
When:  6:30 PM, Tonight!
Where:  PGE Park (formerly Civic Stadium)

Two tickets per employee - first come, first served.

Please e-mail me to indicate interest.

Thanks!
Anna


Thanks for the follow up.  Please move forward with this offer with the sign
on payment.  Thanks.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Hector McLoughlin @ ENRON                           08/22/2000 09:46 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Toni Graham/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Approval for Sign on Bonuses

Sally,
In answer to your question regarding the approval process for sign on
bonuses, Sheila Walton informed me of the following.
If you are primarily in agreement regarding a small sign on bonus award,
then no further approval process is necessary.     If the sign on bonus
amount is substantial then approval from David Oxley is advisable.
In our current case, a $5,000.00 sign on for a Sr. Specialist would not
require additional approval except your own.
I will continue to monitor sign on bonus offers and provide you with a
recommendation based on all available factors.

hgm


http://www.quicken.com/investments/charts/?period=3MONTH&charttype=HIST&big=on
&plot=LINE&mavg=10+50&dji=&sp500=&nasdaq=&symbol=TXN


I want you to lunch with Nony and I tomorrow?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Gregg,

As we discussed... I would add the following provision at the end of the
second sentence in Section VIII A. (3):

;provided however, in the event that Seller's invoice to Buyer is delayed due
to Buyer not providing Seller the ANR information in the time period
specified in Section V (2), the due date for payment of the Demand Charge
shall be the twenty fifth (25th) day following the service month.

Stacy


Shona and Sherri,
Enclosed you will please find the final issued EES London Doorstep with
attachments.
Vlady and Sheila


I would like to schedule the last  week of 1999,  Dec. 27 - Dec. 30, as
vacation.  No one else has selected those dates.  Please let me know if this
is a problem.  Thanks.  Sara


Please look over the attached document?  If okay, please complete and send.

	Steve HPL Schneider
	06/01/2001 03:33 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Contract Alteration

This is the first of several contracts I need you to alter to make specific
between HPL and a third party counterpart, taking out the Enron and its
affiliate spin.  Please forward your altered draft back to me when
completed.  Send to SSchneider@aep.com with a copy to MLCarriere@aep.com.


below is a list of the cos. that have recently sent us load data, but are not in the database. All folders are in M:\User Pub\Todd\ERCOT Region\Active List

Folder	Subfolder	File	Tab	Zone	Notes
AEP PTB	CP&L	CP&L Power Data	Indexed Data	South	Column E contains load data
Chevron	(None)	Loadshape_Setup_Chevron	Sheet1	South/West/North
Diamond Shamrock	(None)	IDRData_98806594	(both tabs)	South
Nucor 	(None)	NucorLoadData	Matrix To Column	North	Column AC contains load data
GM	(None)	Consolidated 3 Accts Interval Data	Matrix To Column	North	Column AC contains load data

this is all for now, I'll keep you updated on all new info we get.

Thks

Rahul Seksaria
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street, Ste 3152A
Tel: (713) 345-8801
Fax: (713) 646-3037


Please see the additional questions below.  Any help is appreciated.  If you
need more detail please let me know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Becky L Merola/DUB/EES on 08/24/2000
03:06 PM ---------------------------

"Taft, Sheldon A." <SATaft@vssp.com> on 08/24/2000 10:33:03 AM
To: "'Becky L Merola'" <bmerola@enron.com>
cc: "Petricoff, M. Howard" <MHPetricoff@vssp.com>
Subject: RE: Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC

In addition, Becky, do your people have views on a realistic flowchart for
interconnection applications?  The utilities are struggling to come up with
a flowchart that would identify the review steps, time requirements, fees,
etc. for different kinds of interconnection applications, including net
metering.  The PUCO staff has asked the non-utility participants to come up
with their own flowchart before our next workshop meeting on August 30.  Can
your people do that?  Is there any more information that I can provide?

-----Original Message-----
From: Becky L Merola [mailto:bmerola@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 11:08 AM
To: Tom Hoatson; Robin Kittel; Joe Hartsoe; Sarah Novosel; Jeff
Dasovich; Jeff Brown
Cc: Taft, Sheldon A.; Janine Migden; Richard Shapiro
Subject: FW: Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC

Hi Folks:
For those of you who have more technical expertise in electricity,  if you
could
look at the attached document and provide me with your comments by August
29th
it would be greatly appreciated.  If there is anyone else that you feel may
be
of assistance in this matter please don't hesitate to forward this document.
Thank you for your help.
---------------------- Forwarded by Becky L Merola/DUB/EES on 08/24/2000
10:56
AM ---------------------------

"Taft, Sheldon A." <SATaft@vssp.com> on 08/24/2000 09:47:18 AM

To:   "'bmerola@enron.com'" <bmerola@enron.com>, "'pmikuls@wpsr.com'"
      <pmikuls@wpsr.com>, "'bkorandovich@newenergy.com'"
      <bkorandovich@newenergy.com>, "'mayer@taftlaw.com'"
<mayer@taftlaw.com>,
      "'kurt@theoec.org'" <kurt@theoec.org>
cc:   "Petricoff, M. Howard" <MHPetricoff@vssp.com>
Subject:  FW: Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC

Here are the Technical Requirements proposed by the utilities at the August
23 PUCO Workshop on Interconnection.  Please have your technical people
review these and share with us any issues or problems that marketers would
have with them.  We will need to identify these issues and problems and to
propose alternatives before the next workshop meeting on August 30.

-----Original Message-----
From: Colbert, Paul [mailto:pcolbert@Cinergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 10:40 AM
To: Taft, Sheldon A.
Subject: Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC

 <<Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC>> Here it is.  Thank you.

From the law offices of Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is intended only for the person
or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged
material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.  If you are the
intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this
medium, please so advise the sender immediately.

________________________________________________________________________

(See attached file: Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC)

From the law offices of Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.  If
you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications
through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.

________________________________________________________________________


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000
09:18 AM ---------------------------

"Darshan Patel" <dpatel@hearme.com> on 08/01/2000 04:08:07 PM

Issue#1)

It is not the physical microphone that is having the problem.  The microphone
volume on the software declines as the speaker talks.

ease respond to <dpatel@hearme.com>
To: "Hunter S Shively" <Hunter.S.Shively@enron.com>, <jmcafee@hearme.com>
cc: "Brent Tiner" <Brent.Tiner@enron.com>
Subject: RE: technical issues

Hunter,

Please see comments below....

>
> 1) When some of the members of the chat room begin to talk, their
> microphone
> volume starts to trail off.
>

Does this happen using different microphones?
Brent: Can you swap the mic of an affected user and see if this persists?

> 2) Many of the users use the ctrl button in their daily
> activities.  The talk
> button needs to be changed to an F# key.
>

I forwarded this request to our Product Marketing group. We have had this
request from other users as well. I will keep you updated on the response.

> 3) We have trouble with latency.
>

I spoke with Brent briefly a few moments ago and suggested changing the
jitter buffer value to 1. If the speech becomes choppy then we will have to
revert to 2 and put in a sniffer on the route to see if there is anything
hardware-wise that may be affecting the data throughput.

Darshan.