Who says the power of prayer doesn't work? I am happy to report that my
dad's hip doesn't seem to be broken after all. The x-rays, and CAT scan show
no signs of a fracture, even though all symptoms indicated such a break. His
pain is gone and this morning he was able to "stand up" in the hospital
room. Later today they are going to do an MRI and a Bone Scan on him to see
what might have caused the pain and lack of movement in his leg. Please
continue to keep Gordon Martin in your prayers, and, Praise God that his hip
is not broken!
-bert-

Promises
by Dr. Bill Bright
September 26, 2001
His Word Remains Forever
Scripture: Matthew 24:36-42
<http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible?language=english&version=NIV&passage=Matth
ew+24:36-42>
35 "Heaven and earth will disappear, but my words remain forever"
42 "Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will
come."

Commentary: In a day of change and turmoil, the promise is made that the
word of God will stand forever. The significance of that guarantee is
monumental, incredible. It is not just that a book shall remain in print;
rather, it is that the multitudinous truths contained in that book likewise
will remain in effect steadfast and true.
Long after heaven and earth have passed away God's holy Word will continue
to endure.
That should mean much to you and me in our daily walk. God's promise, "All
things work together for good," to the believer is just as true today as it
was when it was written centuries ago.
In fact, every one of the promises in the Word of God - including the 365
referred to in this daily devotional - is bona fide, guaranteed by the God
of the universe, the Creator of all things. That alone should strengthen our
faith to know that we can trust him supremely with our lives and everything
concerned with them.
When all else fails, when hope is almost gone, we can come back to the Word
of God, which is "quick and powerful and sharper than a two-edged sword." It
will have the answer for every problem, every burden, every need we face.
Prayer: The hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will
worship the Father in spirit and truth. O God, the author of peace, to know
You is eternal life and to serve You is perfect freedom: Defend us, Your
humble servants, in all assaults of our enemies; that we, trusting in Your
defense, may not fear the power of any adversaries; through the might of
Jesus Christ our Lord. We celebrate our creation, preservation, and all the
blessings of this life; but above all for Your immeasurable love in the
redemption of the world by our Lord Jesus Christ; for the means of grace,
and for the hope of glory. And, we pray, give us such an awareness of Your
mercies, that with truly thankful hearts we may show forth Your praise, not
only with our lips, but in our lives, by giving up our selves to Your
service, and by walking before You in holiness and righteousness all our
days; through Jesus Christ our Lord, to whom, with You and the Holy Spirit,
be honor and glory throughout all ages. Amen.

TODAY'S ACTION POINT: I will place my complete confidence in God's
unchanging Word and will rest upon His faithful promises to all believers
for supernatural living.
Praise Report and Prayer Requests:
I want to express my gratitude to everyone for their prayers for Jack. He
did have his surgery last Tuesday. He made it through but is still in
intensive care and it was confirmed that the cancer has spread to his liver.
His chemo will be postponed till he is well enough to get into a room then
to his home. His recovery is slow but he did come off the ventilator Sunday
and actually took a drink of Sprite today--huge progress, praise God. I'd
like to put Wayne Owens on the prayer list also. As you know Wayne had renal
cancer about 5 or 6 years ago. He has been having muscular pain in his legs
and throughout his body--the pain was so severe he had to stop all athletic
activity. The doctors do not think it is cancer. Thank you sweet John. I
will keep you updated on both of these wonderful people. Brenda

Hi John: An update on Dave... is back in intensive care after brain
surgery.. leak of brain fluid, had to be drained and now has
infection...must clear up infection, then they will put in a shunt to keep
fluid off the brain...we ask the Lord to continue to bless Dave with courage
to endure the pain and headaches and faith that that he will be allowed to
complete his mission here on earth.... The Lord never said this journey on
earth would be easy: he just said it would be worth it.

I want to share a cute story that a friend passed on to me. He teaches
seminary each day to our youth.. A Sunday school teacher asked each student
if they knew another word for happiness. The word he was looking for was
Joy. Then he told the students to take each letter.. J is for Jesus, O is
for others, and Y is for yourself. The secret for having happiness in your
life is to put Jesus first, others next, and yourself last. Thought you
might want to pass this on to all our friends. Have a great day! Love, MJ

Good Morning, Please keep my father, Gordon Martin, in your prayers today.
Yesterday was his 81st birthday, and to celebrate...he broke his hip! He was
sitting in his chair and tried to "get up" and hurt his hip area. He was
able to walk around yesterday and last night with a cane, but during the
night his right leg stiffened and was unable to move it this morning. His
doctor (Warren Longmire, who still makes house calls) came by this morning
and was almost 100% sure he had broken his hip. Dad is now at Clear Lake
Area Hospital with my Mom and a couple of my sisters. -bert-
PRAYER LIST: (Pray for our brothers and sisters each day)*override*
Gordon Martin (On his 81st birthday fell...is suspected of having a broken
his hip!.. is now at Clear Lake Area Hospital ..Dr. Warren Longmire will
confirm if the hip is broken today.)

Lisa Smotts - (Cancer - Please pray the prayer of agreement (That The Lords
Will, Will Be Done) with me and that the Lord will be glorified- Lisa.)
Doug Collings - (Nerve Disorder-Pray For Courage & Determination-Headaches
getting worse! Doug was told by doctors 9/11 that there was no hope...we
know different!)
Elaine Collings - (Sever back pain - osteoporious - bone deterioration is
severe - has seen some improvement and is seeing a chiropractor.)
Jim Tirayoh - (Kidney failure dialysis treatments 3 times a week-Great
Attitude-Loves The Lord)
Martha Humphries - (Lung Cancer- Breast Cancer -Surgery completed - last
radiation treatment on 8/31..Returns for check ups once a month. Home in
good spirits.)
Jeannie - (Leukemia - has qualified to new study - is doing so well on her
Glivac therapy for her leukemia that her blood counts are almost normal! )
Stefanie Jolliff (scoliosis - S curvature of the spine - Steffi has
faithfully worn her back brace for the past full year for 17 to 23 hours
each day...pretty tough for a spunky 15 year old teenager - great progress
being made - keep Steffi in your prayers.)
Herta Boehl (Muscular Dystrophy - Lives by herself - reconciliation with son
Norman has happened unbelievable attitude!)
Susan Blackburn (Breast cancer-surgery completed and she has begun recovery
- passed the halfway point with her chemo. Four more treatments followed by
radiation. She has really stepped it up at her new job which is paying
dividends. Her spirits are good - has joined us for prayer, praise &
worship!)
Steve & Beth (Steve is trying to regulate his meds so that he won't reject
his new liver and his immune system will still be strong enough to battle
the Hep C virus.)
John ( Alpha One lung disease and needs a transplant-has been accepted for a
transplant at Methodist in Houston.)
Monica Menier (has a rare genetic disease - is deaf and is slowly going
blind. Married -two small girls. Loves the Lord -is believing for her
healing -Pray in agreement with her for her healing.)
Karen Madison -Her Mother-Husband -Extended Family -(Mother has
hypothyroidism -requesting prayer for this family for strength,
determination, focus, love, peace and healing.)
Thomas Carey (Heroin addiction - the family is devastated - in prison - Pray
for Thomas and his family.)
Beccy Ackelson (Cancer - home from the hospital -checkup completed and the
cancer does not seem to have spread! - requests our prayers.)
Victor de los Santos (Kidney failure - home - working - will be taking
dialysis until a kidney transplant is available-is back in hospital with
some sort of infection.)
Amber Voss (diagnosed with Ewing Sarcoma, a form of bone cancer - friend of
Helen J. Harrison-Requests prayer!)
Kathy Stickney (Lift up Kathy as she provides support, leadership and
comfort to her daughter Leah and her children and her son-in-law Adam Ford
during these very difficult times.)
Leslie Jenkins (Tumors have re-appeared on her liver and colon - she remains
faith filled that this will all work for the good. May be a candidate for
some type of experimental treatment.)
Mrs. Humble (Bob Humble's 80 year young mother-leg amputated below the
knee-needs prayer for encouragement. Mrs. Humble is now eating again and has
a fresh new attitude about the whole thing. Bob and his family look to the
Lord for His will!)
Cindy Hogman (32 year old mother - diagnosed with stage 4 cervical cancer-
pray for healing -pray for her husband Nick Hogman.)
Bill Corey (Lou Gherig's disease - Surgery was successful - no melanoma was
discovered on his back. Wife Mary also needs our prayers!)
Nicholle(Coco). (Daughter of Debbie Harrison-has found a lump in her
breast,and will go in on the 1st of Sept for an Ultra sound.. test reveal NO
Hepititis..waiting for other testing results.)
Jan Klinck & Family (airplane crash just outside of San Antonio-in ICU at
Brooke Army Medical Hospital Burn Center in San Antoino, Texas. Jan is
responding well to treatment and surgery. Great Report on 9/22. Continue to
pray for Jan, his doctors and the entire family!)
Dr. John E and wife Jeannie ( lost his physicians license due to alcoholism
-Jeannie is in
12 step program and is back with John since a recent seizure while drinking
on anti-seizure meds. He is now determined to stop drinking. Jeannie
recently commented that "God is doing for me what I cannot do for myself.
Each day, I must start fresh".)
Jennifer (recently gave up her sobriety to try it her way; but, is now in
phone contact with another lady in AA with over 30 years sober. Pray for her
willingness to give her drinking to God. ).
Dave (recently suffered a massive stroke-has not been able to relieve the
headaches and blurred vision-brain surgery 9/20- is back in intensive care
after brain surgery.. leak of brain fluid-they will put in a shunt to keep
fluid off the brain.)
Alex Morozov (5 months old-out of surgery. Alex is off a respirator and
doing better. They identified the "parent" tumor and removed it. He is
stable for now. Pray for Alex, Ivan and Galina, his parents.)
Luciana Hernandez (Young woman diagnosed as having lupus. Pray for Luciana
and her friends and family as they seek the Lords will and healing for
Luciana.)
Franki T (Her 17 year old son has run away, she has two other children to
care for, the circumstances have been confusing at best...her mental and
physical condition are fragile at this time-she was admitted to the mental
facilities over the weekend..pray for Franki)
Zachary Sisk (Zackary has Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy..with all of this,
Zackary has graduated from high school. Zackary needs our prayers each day
for strength, determination and a willingness to continue the struggle. Pray
for his family that stands firmly by him each day.)
Tim (Tim moved out of his mother's Houston apartment last year and at age 23
is living on his own in Chicago. He has been in treatment centers twice for
drug and alcohol addiction. He and his dad have re-established contact.)
Jack Henney (has colon cancer- made it through surgery but is still in
intensive care and it was confirmed that the cancer has spread to his
liver-His chemo will be postponed till he is well enough to get into a room
then to his home.)
Florence Docktor (Florence is 82 and lives by herself. She has been having
problems lately and has been diagnosed with cancer. She is meeting with her
family to decide what course of action to take in her battle. Pray for this
entire family.)
Mark Pennell (Is among the many reservists that are or may be going to be
called to active duty. We want to lift up all of these folks and celebrate
the protection our Lord is providing for each.)
Donna Brooks (Donnas' son Jerry committed suicide on 9/17. She needs our
prayers as she reaches out to find confort in the Lord)
Wayne Owens (had cancer several years ago-has been having muscular pain in
his legs and throughout his body--the pain was so severe he had to stop all
athletic activity. The doctors do not think it is cancer.)
Prayer Of Healing (by Max Lucado Sent In By Joe Collins)
This prayer was prayed by Max Lucado on Moody radio. He had prayed it in
his church worship service on Sunday.

Dear Lord, We're still hoping we'll wake up. We're still hoping we'll open
a sleepy eye and think, "What a horrible dream." But we won't, will we,
Father? What we saw was not a dream. Planes did gouge towers. Flames did
consume our fortress. People did perish. It was no dream and, dear Father,
we are sad.

There is a ballet dancer who will no longer dance and a doctor who will no
longer heal. A church has lost her priest, a classroom is minus a teacher.
Cora ran a food pantry. Paige was a counselor and Dana, dearest Father,
Dana was only three years old. (Who held her in those final moments?) We
are sad, Father. For as the innocent are buried, our innocence is buried as
well. We thought we were safe. Perhaps we should have known better. But we
didn't.

And so we come to you. We don't ask you for help; we beg you for it. We
don't request it; we implore it. We know what you can do. We've read the
accounts. We've pondered the stories and now we plead, "Do it again, Lord.
Do it again."

Remember Joseph? You rescued him from the pit. You can do the same for us.
Do it again, Lord.
Remember the Hebrews in Egypt? You protected their children from the angel
of death. We have children, too, Lord. Do it again.
And Sarah? Remember her prayers? You heard them. Joshua? Remember his
fears? You inspired him. The women at the tomb? You resurrected their hope.
The doubts of Thomas? You took them away. Do it again, Lord. Do it again.
You changed Daniel from a captive into a king's counselor. You took Peter
the fisherman and made him Peter an apostle. Because of you, David went
from leading sheep to leading armies. Do it again, Lord, for we need
counselors today, Lord. We need apostles. We need leaders. Do it again,
dear Lord.

Most of all, do again what you did at Calvary. What we saw here last
Tuesday, you saw there that Friday. Innocence slaughtered. Goodness
murdered. Mothers weeping. Evil dancing. Just as the smoke eclipsed our
morning, so the darkness fell on your Son. Just as our towers were
shattered, the very Tower of Eternity was pierced. And by dusk, heaven's
sweetest song was silent, buried behind a rock. But you did not waver, O
Lord. You did not waver. After three days in a dark hole, you rolled the
rock and rumbled the earth and turned the darkest Friday into the brightest
Sunday. Do it again, Lord. Grant us a September Easter.

We thank you, dear Father, for these hours of unity. Christians are praying
with Jews. Republicans are standing with Democrats. Skin colors have been
covered by the ash of burning buildings. We thank you for these hours of
unity. And we thank you for these hours of prayer. The Enemy sought to
bring us to our knees and succeeded. He had no idea, however, that we would
kneel before you. And he has no idea what you can do.

Let your mercy be upon our President, Vice President, and their families.
Grant to those who lead us wisdom beyond their years and experience. Have
mercy upon the souls who have departed and the wounded who remain. Give us
grace that we might forgive and faith that we might believe. And look
kindly upon your church. For two thousand years you've used her to heal a
hurting world. Do it again, Lord. Do it again.
Through Christ,
Amen.

thanks...
bert r martin
publications production manager
409.747.7809 office
409.942.6208 alpha pager

 <<...OLE_Obj...>>


John,

We are trying to hire Rabi De, whose sign-on bonus proposal
was sent to you for approval, for RAC. He will support
vale-at-risk applications, the area where we are hopelessly understaffed.

Vince


We have found 1,000 dth/d at MacClendantown A06 for CPA. We only need 1,857
there now, will get you upstream info.


Could you please change the curve mappings on a type of trade for Robyn
Menear.  THe trade is a GD Index swap for out months.  THe product type is US
GAS Basis - GD/M Trunk WLA.  This is currently being mapped to a GDP curve
adn we need it changed to TRUNKL/WLA-GD.  Robyn sets this curve everyday as a
basis curve.  Thanks.  If you have any questions or concerns, please feel
free to shout.
PL


---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000 09:41
AM ---------------------------

"De Dalmas, Guillaume" <guillaume.dedalmas@csfb.com> on 08/01/2000 09:31:17 AM
To: "'sheila.glover@enron.com'" <sheila.glover@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: CSFB legal docs

Dear Sheila

My colleagues have told me that you have received the following CSFB
documents.

* PrimeTrade access agreement
* standardized give ups
* clearing docs
* futures fees.

Please let me know if you need any help or have any questions , I will make
sure that you get answers right away.

Sincerely

G de Dalmas

Guillaume de Dalmas
Director
CREDIT | FIRST
SUISSE | BOSTON
Prime Brokerage & Listed Derivatives
Eleven Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10010-3629
email:guillaume.dedalmas@csfb.com
Tel:      212-325-2730
Fax:     603-250-4916
Mobile: 914-830-4842

[INFO] -- Content Manager:
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


OK, thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:57 AM
To:	Hennessy, Sonia
Subject:	RE: Timecard

That's it for me.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hennessy, Sonia
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:38 AM
To:	Reeves, Leslie; White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Timecard

I am going to do your timecards for Jan. 1-15.  Is there any other time that I need to code besides the holiday on Jan. 1st?

Sonia Hennessy
Enron Networks
Phone# 713-345-4858
Fax# 713-646-2443
Location:  EB3103g
sonia.hennessy@enron.com


Robert:

Actually, I will be out of the office Mon - Wed of next week.  Tana is
expecting you and will be able to get you started on the swap training
program.  You will probably need to give her name at the receptionist in the
lobby - her extension is x33399.  If she isn't around, Jan Dobernecker
(x33427) will at least be able to get you in the building.  Your office will
be EB3847 and your phone number will be (713)853-6121.  Have a good flight!

Mark

Robert Quick
03/10/99 01:24 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re secondment

Mark, shall I report to you when I arrive on Monday am? tks


UN WIRE
An Independent News Briefing about the United Nations
-------------------------------------------------------
Monday, 16 October, 2000 - http://www.unfoundation.org

Today's UN WIRE Stories

UN AFFAIRS
 1 AWARD: UNHCR Head Receives Seoul Peace Prize
 2 FRAUD: Woman Found Guilty For Spending UN Money

HEALTH
 3 EBOLA: Outbreak Blamed For 35 Deaths In Uganda
 4 HIV/AIDS: Southeast Asian Crisis Could Rival Africa's --
Scientists
 5 HIV/AIDS II: Mbeki Says He Will Withhold Comments
 6 POLIO: African Nations Launch Coordinated Campaign; More

WOMEN, CHILDREN AND POPULATION
 7 WOMEN'S RIGHTS: Global Protests Target Violence, Poverty
 8 RURAL WOMEN: Groups Call For Greater Awareness, Empowerment
 9 CHILD RIGHTS: UNICEF Ambassador Criticizes US

ENVIRONMENT
 10 POLLUTION: Canada, US Announce Smog Reduction Accord
 11 RHINOS: Kenya Boasts Stable, Growing Population

ECONOMICS, TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT
 12 DEBT RELIEF: Poor Countries Need More -- UN Report
 13 LATIN AMERICA: Disparities Widen As Mexico, Chile, Brazil
Grow
 14 INDONESIA: World Bank Concerned About Recovery

HUMANITARIAN AID AND FOOD SECURITY
 15 WORLD FOOD DAY: Little Headway Made Against Hunger -- FAO
 16 SOUTHEAST ASIA: UNHCR Chief Holds Talks With Myanmar; More

HUMAN RIGHTS, JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY
 17 UN RIGHTS COMMITTEE: 70th Session Opens Today

CRIME, CORRUPTION AND DRUGS
 18 YUGOSLAVIA: UN, UK Police Arrest 25 In Crime Raid
 19 BOLIVIA: UNDCP Pushes Alternative Crops To Replace Coca

PEACEKEEPING AND SECURITY
 20 MIDDLE EAST: Emergency Talks Begin In Egypt; More
 21 CONGO: UN Gives Warring Parties Two Months To Resume Talks

GET THE FULL SCOOP

These stories and the complete issue of today's UN Wire
can be found on the Web at http://www.unfoundation.org.
The Web version includes hot-links to the complete text
of cited articles, a fully searchable archive and easy
access to recent issues.

ACCESS RECENT ISSUES at
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwire/archives/index.cfm

UN Wire is a free service sponsored by the United Nations
Foundation and its sister organization, the Better World
Fund, which are dedicated to supporting United Nations
efforts on behalf of the environment, population stabilization
and children's health.  UN Wire is produced independently by
National Journal Group (http://www.nationaljournal.com).  For
the latest information and updates on UN Foundation activities,
visit us on the web at http://www.unfoundation.org.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2000 National Journal.

Telephone: (703) 518-8759
Fax:       (703) 519-6377
Email:     unwire@unfoundation.org

Editor in Chief:  Steve Hirsch
--------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the UN Wire Notification Service, go to
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwirelogin/unf_listadmin.cfm

Questions, concerns and comments can be sent to
unwire@unfoundation.org.

UN news and other submissions should be directed to
unwire-submit@unfoundation.org.

You are currently subscribed to unfoundation-unwire as:
klay@enron.com

To subscribe, visit the UN Wire Web site at:
http://www.unfoundation.org/unwirelogin/unf_listadmin.cfm
and enter your email address. Registration is required.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to the address below:
leave-unfoundation-unwire-290701M@lists.unfoundation.org
--------------------------------------------------------------


Start Date: 2/2/02; HourAhead hour: 12;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


just chill girl.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:34 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i'm not getting worked up, i was just typing a playful, meaningless email.
stop trying to pick a fight with me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:29 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

it isn't that big of a deal.  why don't you just relax about the whole
thing.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:24 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   no, i'm not.  by the way, i broke down and told jenn about the whole
   bonnie
   thing.  she doesn't think i look like her either so now i am feeling
   much
   better no thanks to you.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:56 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   no.  you are so gullable.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:39 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      so, are you really "hitting the strip clubs" tonight?

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:38 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      ok

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:36 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         ok, enough.  this isn't funny anymore.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:32 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         yeah.  i think we are hitting the strip clubs.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 1:23 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            of course i am.  i am going out straight from work.  you?

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:35 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            i am ready to go tonight.  you going out?

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:30 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               shut up, stop lying.  i don't believe you at all.

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:29 PM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               where didn't i go?

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:24 PM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  where did you go?

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                  Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:25 PM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject: RE:

                  no really.  it was a blast.  little tired but i can rally
      for
               tonight.

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
   @ENRON
                     Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:21 PM
                     To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                     Subject:  RE:

                     liar

                     -----Original Message-----
                     From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
            [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                     Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:22 PM
                     To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                     Subject: RE:

                     i didn't even go home

                         -----Original Message-----
                        From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
      @ENRON
                        Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:19 PM
                        To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                        Subject:  RE:

                        great, you don't stand a chance.  i didn't get home
      until
            5:30
                  this
                        morning
                        and i think i was still drunk when i got to work.
   how
         about
               you?

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Lenhart, Matthew
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
                        Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:58 AM
                        To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                        Subject:

                        how are we doing on our contest?

   **********************************************************************
                        This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or
   its
            relevant
                     affiliate
                        and
                        may contain confidential and privileged material
   for
      the
            sole
               use
                  of
                     the
                        intended recipient (s). Any review, use,
   distribution
      or
                  disclosure
                     by
                        others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
         intended
                  recipient
                     (or
                        authorized to receive for the recipient), please
      contact
         the
                  sender
                     or
                        reply
                        to Enron Corp. at
         enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
            and
                  delete
                        all
                        copies of the message. This e-mail (and any
      attachments
            hereto)
                  are
                     not
                        intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do
   not
         create
            or
                     evidence
                        a
                        binding and enforceable contract between Enron
   Corp.
      (or
         any
            of
                  its
                        affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
         party,
            and
               may
                     not
                        be
                        relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
         estoppel
            or
                     otherwise.
                        Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


**********************************************************************
CERA Conference Call: Sent Tue, November 07, 2000
**********************************************************************

Title: CERA Conference Call: FERC's Order for California Market: Bold
Decision of Insufficient Action?
Author:
E-Mail Category: Conference Call
Product Line: Western Energy , North American Power ,
URL: http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/eprofile.cfm?u=5166&m=1412 ,
http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/eprofile.cfm?u=5166&m=1413 ,

Alternative URLs:
Western Energy Members:
http://www.cera.com/client/ce/cc/110700_16/ce_cc_110700_16_ab.html

N. American Electric Power Members:
http://www.cera.com/client/nap/cc/110700_16/nap_cc_110700_16_ab.html
***********************************************************************
North American Electric Power and Western Energy
Conference Call
A Cambridge Energy Research Associates Conference Call

TOPIC
FERC'S ORDER FOR THE CALIFORNIA MARKET:
BOLD DECISION OR INSUFFICIENT ACTION?

* A FERC Vote for Market Solutions
* Where is the Relief for Retail Customers?
* What's Next for California and Western Wholesale
Markets?
* Implications for the Broader North American Power
Market

FORMAT
At the time listed below, our speakers will address this
topic for approximately 30 minutes, followed by an open
question and answer period.

SPEAKERS
Larry Makovich, CERA Senior Director, North American
Electric Power
Mike Zenker, CERA Director, Western Energy

TIME
1:00 P.M. Eastern, Monday, November 13, 2000

ELIGIBILITY
Clients eligible to participate in this conference call
are those who subscribe to the North American Electric
Power Retainer Advisory Service or the Western Energy
Retainer Advisory Service.

TO ENROLL
To enroll, please contact Ms. Kari Paakaula via fax at
(617) 497-0423, or enroll via e-mail at
kpaakaula@cera.com before 4:00 P.M., Friday, November
10, 2000.

AUDIO
For the audio portion of the call, please call in on one
of the following numbers approximately five (5) minutes
before the call:

Within the United States: 1-800-946-0741
Outside the United States: (719) 457-2649
Confirmation Code: 640107
Title of the call: CERA Call

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
U.S. callers: If you are experiencing difficulties
during the call, you may signal for technical assistance
by pressing *0 (star, zero) on your telephone keypad

International callers: Please re-dial and ask the
operator for assistance before giving the confirmation
code.

A recording of this call (audio only) will be available
until December 13, 2000. To access this recording,
please call 1-888-203-1112 (within the U.S.) or (719)
457-0820 (outside the U.S.). Please use confirmation
number 640107 to access the call.

********************************************************
**
For more information, please contact Kari Paakaula via
e-mail at kpaakaula@cera.com or via telephone at (617)
441-1362.

**end**

Follow URL for HTML version of this message only.

**********************************************************************
Account Changes
To edit your personal account information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://eprofile.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042204.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:   1.91 / Final:   1.88)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Thank you very much - can I get a copy of the Risk article?

The BIS numbers unfortunately do not distinguish which of the commodity
numbers are applicable to energy, and worse yet they include only numbers
from reporting banks.  In the energy area a large proportion of the
transactions are by non-bank institutions -this makes finding the numbers
much harder because companies like Enron are not required to publicly
disclose their positions.  Hopefully the Risk article has some numbers but if
you can find anything else specifically relating to the size of the energy
derivatives markets that would be helpful.

Judith Schlesinger
01/25/2000 09:42 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: OTC market size

Mark,

I found an article in Risk, April 1999 titled "Banking on energy derivatives:
Brokers are acting more and more like investment banks, designing structured
trades and bundled risk management solutions.  Nowhere is the trend more
clear than in the energy markets."   Also,  the attached reports describe the
OTC market.  Please let me know where to go from here.

Judy
3-9584


Alliance Deliveries Delayed until Nov. 13

In a move that is likely to send ripples through the market, particularly
around Chicago, the 1.325 Bcf/d Alliance Pipeline extended its commercial
in-service delay last week to Nov. 13 from Oct. 30. Pipeline officials said
moisture and debris in the line caused the delay.

"As we have increased the flow of test gas volumes during our system
commissioning, we have encountered moisture and debris from construction,"
said CEO Norm Gish. "Specifically, most of the debris is in the form of small
pieces of foam from the [smart] pigs that were used to remove the hydrostatic
testing water from the line. The problem forced us to shut down the system
for short periods of time to clean out accumulated debris.

"We have since designed and installed additional in-line screens at our
compressor stations. The situation is improving and we are removing
ever-decreasing amounts of debris with increased flows of test gas. However,
this situation has not permitted us to run our system with the significant
volumes necessary to adequately test the reliability of our compressors."

It is the second time Alliance has had to delay its in-service date. In early
September, Alliance officials said rain in Saskatchewan this summer,
directional drilling problems at a creek in British Columbia, complex
connection problems with the Aux Sable liquids plant in Illinois and
connection delays with several U.S. pipelines and LDCs was to blame for a
one-month delay to Oct. 30 (see Daily GPI, Sept. 11).

The pipeline will continue increasing test volumes until it begins commercial
service, said Gish. There currently is about 500 MMcf/d of test gas in the
line. He expects firm delivery capacity to reach the full 1.325 Bcf/d prior
to Nov. 13.

Alliance officials also noted that this is the first time a pipeline the size
of Alliance has been brought on stream at one time.

Regardless of the challenge, however, market participants were expecting the
system to be delivering gas starting at the beginning of the month of
November and this delay is likely to have a significant impact on November
bidweek trading.

One Chicago trader said he had a strong suspicion something was fishy when
his index offers were lifted Friday afternoon by a marketing company, which
he knows to own capacity on the pipe. "Everyone was a buyer of index gas
today for November, especially those now short for the first 13 days. I sold
mine at NGI plus 1.5, but had I known that Alliance was delayed I would have
held out for something a little better."

Basis, meanwhile, was pretty much unchanged at +13 to +14 for November. "It
takes a lot to move the Chicago basis," he said.


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/11/2001 03:22 PM -----

	Susan J Mara
	07/11/2001 02:53 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: A.98-07-026 et al. - Joint Petition of SCE, PG&E, and SDG&E

Here in one answer on why an ESP agreed to support termination of the audit

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/11/2001 12:52 PM -----

	"Anderson, Robert E(Z01841)" <Bob_Anderson@apses.com>
	07/11/2001 12:48 PM

		 To: "'Susan.J.Mara@enron.com'" <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: A.98-07-026 et al. - Joint Petition of SCE, PG&E, and SDG&E

We agreed to this petition to terminate the audit once the year 2000 was
complete so that we could use that for our negative PX Credit claim proof.
Following Jan 19th of 2001 this schedule is dead anyway. Needing the audit
results of 1999 and 1998 was useless. We will be lucky to gain our money
from 2000 there is absolutely no hope of getting anything from those years
if there was an error. In addition our own analysis didn't show any areas we
were worried about in those years after our 2 run in and subsequent UDC
corrections in 98 and 99. The initial UDC position was to simply stop paying
for the audits just as they did with the PX Credits with virtually no
discussion with the CPUC.

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan.J.Mara@enron.com [mailto:Susan.J.Mara@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:23 PM
To: Anderson, Robert E(Z01841); athomas@newenergy.com
Subject: Fw: A.98-07-026 et al. - Joint Petition of SCE, PG&E, and SDG&E

Why did you two support eliminating the audit of the PX Credit?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/11/2001 11:20 AM -----

                    "Dan Douglass"

                    <douglass@energyatt        To:     "Vicki Sandler"

                    orney.com>                 <vicki_sandler@apses.com>,
"Sue Mara"
                                               <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
"Steve Huhman"
                    07/10/2001 06:47 PM        <steve.huhman@mirant.com>,
"Roger Pelote"
                                               <roger.pelote@williams.com>,
"Rob Nichol"
                                               <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
"Randy Hickok"
                                               <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>,
"Nam Nguyen"
                                               <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
"Joe Paul"
                                               <jmpa@dynegy.com>, "Jeff
Dasovich"
                                               <jeff.dasovich@enron.com>,
"Janie Mollon"
                                               <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,
"Jack Pigott"
                                               <jackp@calpine.com>, "Greg
Blue"
                                               <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "George
Vaughn"
                                               <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
"Gary Ackerman"

<foothillservices@mindspring.com>, "Curtis
                                               Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>,
                                               "Curt Hatton"
<curt.hatton@neg.pge.com>,
                                               "Corby Gardiner"

                                               <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>,
"Charles
                                               Miessner"
<camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
                                               "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>,
                                               "Bob Anderson"
<Bob_Anderson@apses.com>,
                                               "Bill Ross"
<billr@calpine.com>, "Ed
                                               Cazalet" <ed@cazalet.com>,
"Denice Cazalet
                                               Purdum" <dpurdum@apx.com>,
"Robert Berry"
                                               <berry@apx.com>, "Tamara
Johnson"
                                               <tjohnso8@enron.com>, "Max
Bulk"
                                               <mbulk@apx.com>

                                               cc:     "ARM"
<arem@electric.com>, "Kenneth
                                               Moy" <Kennethm@abag.ca.gov>,
"Jerry Lahr"
                                               <jerryl@abag.ca.gov>, "Dave
Finigan"
                                               <davef@abag.ca.gov>, "Merilyn
Ferrara"
                                               <merilyn_ferrara@apses.com>

                                               Subject:     Fw: A.98-07-026
et al. - Joint
                                               Petition of SCE, PG&E, and
SDG&E

Attached for your information is a joint petition for modification of the
1998 Revenue Adjustment Proceeding ("RAP") decision filed today by SCE,
PG&E
and SDG&E.  The utilities request that, on an expedited basis, the
Commission limit the scope of the PX Credit audit which WPTF obtained in a
negotiated settlement in the 1998 RAP proceeding to remaining year 2000
calculations and thereafter order that the audit be terminated.  They state
that the audit is both irrelevant and costly and that "common sense
demands"
the Commission reconsider the decision.

They ask that comments in opposition be filed by August 3, reply comments
on
August 10 and a Commission decision at its meeting scheduled for August 23.
They also ask the Commission to waive the period provided in Rule 77.7 for
comments and reply comments on a draft decision in order that the decision
become final immediately.

The filing states that there have been dramatic changes in energy markets,
the number of DA customers has declined significantly and that ratepayers
should not have to pay for the audit.  Of course, they don't mention that
the reason for the decline in DA customers is their own failure to pay the
PX Credit.  It is instead attributed to the "dysfunctional restructuring
scheme and concommitant rise in wholesale energy prices."  They justify
their request legally by stating that their filing demonstrates that there
are "significant new facts" and a "material change in conditions."  The
third criteria for reopening or modifying a Commission decision, a basic
misconception of law or fact by the Commission, is not alleged to have
occurred.

They also state that DA penetration will continue to decline because
"Assembly Bills X1-1 and X1-6 have effectively reregulated the market."

Attached to the filing are declarations from the three ESP members of the
Audit Committee, Bob Anderson of APSES,  Aaron Thomas of AES NewEnergy and
Marilynn Semro of Seattle City Light Department, in support of the
utilities' petition.  I have not reviewed the specific wording changes to
the RAP decision to determine if there are any problems with the proposed
modifications.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com

(See attached file: 7-10-01 RAP Joint Petition.PDF)


Tana:

The following CPs are not authorized to trade US power:

Delta Air Lines
Newmont Mining Corporation

Leslie


Larry
Here are the individual plot plans for 1 and 2.

M3-1A.dwg & .tif are the station 1 plot plans. M3-1B.dwg & .tif are the
station 2 plot plans. The files need to be placed in the same directory. You
would open the .dwg file in Autocad and it will bring in the related .tif to
complete the drawing.

Thanks
Mike


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/06/2000 06:05
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     12/05/2000 06:12 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ Calif Sen Introduces Bill To Change ISO, CalPX Board

13:16 GMT 5 December 2000 DJ Calif Sen Introduces Bill To Change ISO, CalPX
Board
(This article was originally published Monday)
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--California State Senator Debra Bowen, D-Redondo
Beach, introduced a bill Monday at the senate's new session that, if
approved, would replace the governing boards of the state's Independent
System Operator and Power Exchange with a governor-appointed three-member
independent board.
In addition, Senate President Pro-Tem John Burton said he will introduce
legislation that would require power suppliers to register with the state
before doing business here and report all wholesale electricity sales and
bids to the state.
The CalPX governing board consists of 28 members and the ISO has 29.
The senate bill, backed by Senate President Pro-Tem John Burton, seeks to
eliminate a conflict of interest that currently exists on the boards because
its members are made up of individuals from utilities and generations
companies.
Lawmakers said the companies represented by members of the boards benefit
from high wholesale electricity prices and therefore they are unable to make
objective decisions that represent the interests of California's consumers.
The energy stakeholder boards were created as a result of the state's 1996
landmark deregulation law and was seen as an entity that could counsel the
operation of the ISO and CalPX while the state moved toward a fully
deregulated market.
The ISO manages the high-voltage transmission system and real-time power
market. The CalPX is the market where electricity is bought and sold.
The bill will go through a 30-day waiting period at the democratic-majority
senate before it is discussed in early January, but it must be passed by the
senate and state assembly before it can be signed into law by the governor.
If signed into law by the governor, the bill "would prohibit a member of the
independent governing board appointed by the governor from being affiliated
with any actual or potential participant in any market administered by the
(ISO or CalPX)," according to a copy of the Bowen Bill.
Electricity is proving to be the hottest topic of the new legislative
session, said Lawrence Lingbloom, consultant on Sen. Bowen's Energy,
Utilities and Communications Committee.
In addition to the Bowen Bill, legislation was also introduced that would
require the state's three investor-owned utilities, Edison International
unit (EIX) Southern California Edison, PG&E Corp. unit (PCG) Pacific Gas &
Electric, and Sempra Energy unit (SRE) San Diego Gas & Electric Co., to buy
a majority of their electricity needs in advance in the forward market, in
order to protect consumers from volatile spot markets.
-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 05-12-00
1316GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


For your information:

Vince Kaminski passed on to me the following California-related presentations
delivered at a recent conference he attended (Energy and Power Risk
Management, 5/14-5/15, Houston).

Please let me know if you would like a copy of any of these:

*Roach, Craig (Boston Pacific Company, Inc.), "Price Caps: An Apparent
Short-Term Solution That Creates Long-Term Problems"
 (hard copy only)

*Wolak, Frank (Department of Economics, Stanford; Chairman, Market
Surveillance Ctte., CAISO),

 1. "What Went Wrong with California's Re-Structured Electricity Market (and
How to Fix It)"
 (ftp://zia.stanford.edu/pub/papers/california.print.pdf)

 2.  "How to Make Competitive Electricity Markets Benefit Consumers"
 (hard copy only)

*Yeres, David (Partner, Clifford Chance Rogers & Wells, LLP), "Wholesale
Power Sales:  A Marketplace Under Scrutiny"
 (hard copy only)

Jennifer


sorry,sorry,sorry
Yesterday was just a little crazy.  Crude had it's biggest fall in 10 years so that translated into a very busy day.  Plus my best employee was just offered a job across the street for a big chunk of money.  At least I made money.
I should be getting my phone line at home today (of course they've been saying that for 5 days now) at which point they can install dsl.  Thatll make it much easier.
Went to the bb game again last night.  Love them stros.
How'd you're presentation go last night? Did the doc talk good about your drug?
Have a good one,
Jonh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dana P" <danaggie@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Dana+20P+22+20+3Cdanaggie+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE:

Good morning my SLED. How's it going? Just woke up...I know. I know. Must be
nice. Anyway, Just wanted to leave you a quick message before I get out of
here. Thanks for dinner. I had a really good time and it was good to meet
cha in person.

Have a great day!!

d

>From: John.Arnold@enron.com
>To: danaggie@hotmail.com
>Subject: RE:
>Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:21:20 -0500
>
>I'm running out the door to go drinking with the boys at front porch, right
>next to my apartment.
>
>I don't think your dad would like me so much.  Will explain later.
>
>Sorry about your day.  Maybe you can find some happiness in the book of
>prayers.  Maybe you can find more happiness in the money.
>
>Talk to you later.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   "Dana P" <danaggie@hotmail.com>@ENRON
>
>[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Dana+20P+22+20+3Cdanaggie+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>
>    Sent:   Friday, September 21, 2001 2:54 PM
>    To:     Arnold, John
>    Subject:  Re:
>
>    Sure, just remind me. It should cut down on your "depends" expenses as
>    well...
>
>    Today. Definitely in the top 10 as far as crappy days go. Started out
>    great.
>    Breakfast with Dad was nice (LePeep by my house). He was very happy I
>    broke
>    up with the energy guy. Wasn't too keen on him being Jewish. Dad's
>    pretty
>    religious in his elder years. Gave me a book of prayers and
>    money....That's
>    what I'm talkin' about!! (I'm going to he@@). Anyway, my boss calls me
>    as we
>    are finishing up and asks me if I knew anything about a meeting I was
>    supposed to be working for NP's (nurse practitioners) at the Westin and
>    I'm
>    like "Uh, No...never got the message". Well, never got the message
>    because
>    she never sent it. Bottom line, I had to blow off all my plans(I was
>    actually planning on calling on doctors today and getting ready for my
>    monday program) and go work this meeting which isn't that big of deal.
>    We
>    just stand around at display tables and answer questions from the
>    doctors/NP's. I was there for and hour and then went to lunch. I came
>    back
>    for an hour and have to do some things here. The good thing about my
>    boss is
>    she's very "hand's off". She stays out of your business unless you call
>    her
>    for something. She has a life outside of this job which is rare for
>    managers. The bad thing is she can be "flighty" sometimes and forgets
>to
>    send things on or lets them pile up and we get the messages a week late
>    (which is probably what happened in this case)
>
>    Anyway, sorry about all the griping but I was on a roll!!
>
>    Hope your day has been good. You workin' out or goin' out after work?
>    Decisions. Decisions. Your gym sounds cool. Laughed at the physique
>    comment.
>    So something I would have said.
>
>    Later,
>
>    d
>
>
>    >From: "Arnold, John" <John.Arnold@ENRON.com>
>    >To: <danaggie@hotmail.com>
>    >Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 10:42:44 -0500
>    >
>    >P.S. - Can you bring me some free samples of the bladder control
>    >medicine.  It'll save me some money.
>    >
>    >
>    >**********************************************************************
>    >This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>    affiliate
>    >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
>    of
>    >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
>disclosure
>    by
>    >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
>    (or
>    >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
>    >reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
>    delete
>    >all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
>are
>    not
>    >intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
>    evidence a
>    >binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
>    >affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
>    be
>    >relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
>    otherwise.
>    >Thank you.
>    >**********************************************************************
>
>
>    _________________________________________________________________
>    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>    http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


For all you fishermen, see the link below:

http://www.allaboutcabo.com/fishreport5.htm


Robert,

Ken developed an industrial report before he left.  It can be found at
o/logistics/kenseaman/industrialsmonthly/...  There is one file for each
month of 2000.  I need you to update this for March.  This will need to be
distributed to Gas Control, Logistics, and myself.  Let me know if you have
any questions.

D


Marcie should be on the call.   Harry, et al. should also be included only
the business units should be uninvited.


SCE's motion for preliminary injunction seeking an order permitting
recoupment of past and future undercollections was denied today.   It appears
that the case will now be scheduled for a future hearing after the parties
have had a chance to develop any relevant facts and fully brief the legal
issues.

Below is a summary of what occurred today:

________________________________________________

     Motion for Preliminary Injunction:  The Court denied SCE's Motion for a
Preliminary Injunction on the merits.  Judge Lew stated that the Motion was
"wholly inappropriate" and that granting it would violate the 11th
Amendment.  The Court stated that mandatory injunctions, such as the one
requested here, are "strongly disfavored" and involve a heightened standard
that SCE failed to meet.  The Court also said it was constrained by the
matters put at issue in the pleadings, and that here the Motion sought relief
in excess of that requested in the complaint.

     While the Court let defense counsel argue for about 15-30 minutes, he
mostly appeared disinterested in what they were saying.  Plaintiff's counsel
did not make any oral argument.

    The Court also said that this case turns on the Pike County exception,
which depends on whether there were alternative markets available; and that
if the exception applies, there is no preemption claim.  The Court said that
there were certain narrow issues before it which is all that it will address,
and that the Court is not a "do it all" problem solver for the parties.  The
Court did not indicate whether it was predisposed to rule for any side.

     Motion for Order Specifying Facts without Substantial Controversy:  The
Court granted the motion as to facts 1-10, 12, and denied it as to facts 1,
13.  The Court found that these particular facts were not substantially
disputed by the defendants, and that further discovery was not needed for the
Court to determine them. (Since I do not have a copy of the filings, I am
unable to provide further comment.  Please let me know if you want me to
obtain copies of the filings.)

     Motions to Intervene:  The Court granted the Motions to Intervene
(permissive intervention) filed by Los Angeles County and the Utility Reform
Network on the ground that their participation would assist the court in
hearing the complex matters presented.

     Motion to Specially Appear:  The Court denied the California Attorney
General's motion to "specially appear" as inappropriate, but without
prejudice to filing a motion for permissive intervention.

     Criticism of Counsel:   The Judge castigated SCE's counsel in several
instances.  He called the preliminary injunction motion "wholly
inappropriate."  He criticized SCE's description in briefs of his ruling on
January 8, 2001, which the Judge said was "flatly wrong."  (He said his
January 8 order did not hold that the filed rate doctrine permits the
plaintiff to recover recoupment costs.)  With respect to the Motion for Order
Specifying Facts, he said he was "not fooled" by SCE's "creative arguments."
The Court also gave a general admonishment about "spinning" his rulings
outside of the courtroom.  Reading between the lines, the Judge seemed
bothered by media reports.  I do not know if the Judge was aware, but SCE had
a public relations person mingling in the court room with the many reporters
present.

     Calendar:  The Court advanced the March 19, 2001 Scheduling Conference
to March 5 at 9:00.  The Conference will address matters including discovery
practice, motion deadlines and the trial date.  The Judge said he would
consider SCE's request for an early trial date.  However, he also said that
it appeared that the primary disputed issues were legal, not factual, and
therefore he expected that summary judgment motions would be filed by both
sides.

     Consolidation with PG&E matter:  The Court initially expressed concern
that the PG&E case was transferred from Northern California, saying he had
doubts that this was the proper venue.  Later, however, the Judge seemed
placated when PG&E's counsel told him that the company had substantial assets
in this district.  One counsel also told the Court that the parties had
stipulated to consolidate the PG&E matter with the SCE matter, though the
Court did not say whether he would order consolidation.

    Impression of Judge:  This was my first time observing Judge Lew.  He
seems extremely strict, straightforward and no-nonsense.  He seemed very well
prepared on the substance and not at all shy about ruling on the merits.  In
the SCE matter and preceding non-related matters, the Judge frequently
cut-off counsel's arguments to focus on narrow issues of law, and made
counsel either answer very specific questions or stop talking completely.
Here, the Judge acknowledged this case's importance and said he does not take
this matter lightly.


STOREY, GEOFFREY C,

The PEP system closes on Friday, May 25, 2001

Our records indicate that you have been requested to provide feedback on one or more Enron employees.  The deadline for completing feedback is Friday,  May 25th.

Below is a list of feedback requests with a status of "OPEN".  Please complete or decline these requests as soon as possible by logging into PEP at http://pep.enron.com and selecting Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.

If you have any questions, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  713-853-4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44 207 783 4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

Employee Name:
AMES, CHARLES
BLACKBURN, NATE
DATTANI, NAYAN
GUGGENHEIM, VICTOR
PEHLIVANOVA, BILIANA
WEI, ZHIYONG


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000
05:37 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
11/15/2000 02:48 PM
To: bobb.supertravel@wspan.com, audrau@yahoo.com, Memaw1995@aol.com,
Kathy.Crenshaw@inteq.com @ Enron, Kayla Crenshaw/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON, IMYoars@aol.com, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Summers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Palm Beach County Ballot Revision

This is so funny!  We all need a good laugh after this past week!

 - Ballot.doc


lets try to work through this one.  it will be a good example of potential
energy deals and give us a good feel of how far out of the zone this is or
whether it will simply take some work.

bs

To: Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Indicative request to buy

Unfortunately, it's not quite that simple.  Duke Energy Trading & Marketing
is a marketing sub and does not prepare separate financials.  The S&P rating
is based on an implied guaranty from Duke Energy.  Legal would also need to
review this counterparty from the standpoint of confidentiality agreement
violations.

Also, as a trading counterparty, Sempra Energy Trading is not authorized for
credit derivative trading, because the existing guaranty does not explicitly
cover this type of transaction.  If Sempra wishes to transact out of this
entity, we can look into amending the guaranty to cover this product.  This
will require legal efforts and approval.

Rod

Tomas Valnek
03/02/2000 08:36 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund
Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: John Metzler/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Indicative request to buy

Both of  these entities have an E-rating of 3. Any issues?

Tomas

---------------------- Forwarded by Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT on 02/03/2000 14:36
---------------------------

John Metzler
01/03/2000 15:41
To: Martin McDermott/LON/ECT@ECT, Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Indicative request to buy

Reference Name:  Duke Energy Trading & Marketing (sub of Duke energy -- he
claims they have their own debt)
Counterparty:   Sempara Energy Trading
Term:    2 years
Notional Amount:  $2 million (I made that up)

John


Kathy,

Attached are two files:  a mini-book of EC3952.O run for Nov-08 thru Oct-23
and a copy of the deal in the transport model.  The file is too large to
email.  There are two tabs:  the first contains deal terms and the second is
a copy of the P&L sheet as of 12/4/2000.  Call me with any questions you may
have.  Thanks for your patience.

DG    3-9573


i am not fighting with you at all.  you are just grilling me.  you are an angry person.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:00 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

whatever, i did not flip out.  i remember everything.  stop fighting with
me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:00 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

i was sober and i remember how it went down.  i said one rude thing in the
car and that was it.  you were just going nuts and wouldn't let it die.
you kept flipping out on me.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 2:49 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   no, that's wrong.  you just kept saying one rude thing after another
   which
   bothered me.  it doesn't matter.  the point is that it should not be so
   difficult for you to not be rude.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:48 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

    only one thing i said was rude, which i apologized for, and you
   wouldn't
   let it die.  most of the stuff was started by you.  you were just
   venting
   frustration you weren't able to communicate when you're sober.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 2:41 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      i only rolled back over once.  i said i was sorry for saying i wished
      you
      were dead, i was just kidding, and i wouldn't have to vent for so
   long
      if
      you wouldn't give me reasons to.  some of the things you said last
   night
      were pretty rude.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:37 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      you kept rolling back over and laying into me.  you are the one who
   said
      you wished i was dead.  you went crazy.  you were pissed all night.
   you
      were venting on a soap box for about 2 hours.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 2:33 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         i was not going nuts.  i was trying to go to sleep and you kept
      bringing
         it
         up.  you're nice, but you have an attitude.  very cocky.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:42 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         i was being nice.  you kept starting it and then blaming it on me.
      you
         were going nuts.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 1:03 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            you deserved it b/c you are a jerk.  you really need to start
      being
            nicer.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:37 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            you were letting me have it.  i deserved some of it b/c i made
      some
         bad
            jokes, but overall you were pretty brutal.  i think i am
   heading
      to
            baton
            rouge for the game this weekend instead of partying for
   halloween.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 12:28 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               no.   why was i mad?

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:29 PM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               you still mad at me?  you were pissed last night.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:50 PM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:

                  you better be getting excited about dinner.  i'm not
   taking
      you
         if
               you
                  aren't.

   **********************************************************************
               This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
   relevant
            affiliate
               and
               may contain confidential and privileged material for the
   sole
      use
         of
            the
               intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
         disclosure
            by
               others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
         recipient
            (or
               authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
         sender
            or
               reply
               to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
   and
         delete
               all
               copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
   hereto)
         are
            not
               intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
   or
            evidence
               a
               binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any
   of
         its
               affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party,
   and
      may
            not
               be
               relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel
   or
            otherwise.
               Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


No further Board approval is required. I'm told that new products on EOL require the lawyers to get involved but that will happen when you request to put the product online. Rick


Jeff:

I don't have the email with me.  It is in the classroom building I don't
remember what room.  If you show up I am sure that you can follow someone
in.  I'll be there, but I have to work in the morning so I may be a little
late.  See you there.

Dylan

At 01:29 PM 10/20/00 -0500, you wrote:

>You by chance know where the review is tomorrow?  It's from 10 am to 2 pm,
>right?  Thanks a bunch.


FYI I will be out of the office after lunch today and will return 12/27/00.
Have a good holiday!


Joe:
I need your help regarding the above counterparties  As you probably know, at
the holding company level, BT and Deutsche merged so that now bankers Trust
is a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG.  ENA has a Master with BT and we are
negotiating one with Deutsche.  Their attorney informed me today that it was
his understanding that all new trades should be confirmed with Deutsche
Bank.  Here is what I need to know:

1. The date of the last trade that we confirmed with BT.

2. The date of the first trade that we have confirmed with Deutsche.

3. A copy of the Deutsche confirm that we are being sent.

Thanks for your help.

Carol


Linda Crawford 512/495-9399 - to be sending emil to Cathy Phillips w/further
details prior to 7/6/00


yes.


Kira-
I got your name (and email address) from Chad Muir and was hoping to arrange
a time to briefly (and informally) talk to you about Yahoo's B2B business
strategy and whether you think there might be any opporunities to discuss
some strategic relationship between Yahoo and Enron Net Works's DealBench
subsidiary.

Without getting into too many details, DealBench is an ASP addressing the
needs of large, secure, sophisticated transaction participants.   We are
currently offering live online auctioning capabilities, online virtual
datarooms and certain deal areas for the syndication of bank products and
lease portfolios.  We have completed transactions with nominal value of over
$4 Billion since launching the site 4 months ago.   My initial thought is
that this could potentially fit in nicely with what I believe is Yahoo's need
for recurring transaction-based revenues in certain B2B areas.

Hopefully we can find time to talk soon.
Take care,
Jeff

Jeffrey M. Bartlett
Principal, DealBench
Director, Enron Net Works
713-853-5629 (work)
713-598-1946 (cell)
jeff.bartlett@dealbench.com
jeff.bartlett@enron.com


I think we finally have everthing.   Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fraser, Jennifer
Sent:	Sunday, August 19, 2001 5:55 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Curves Update

Kevin:
Are you still having problems getting the curves for crude , products and coal?
Thanks
Jen


i think they have two rooms with two double beds in each.  jen knows the
details, but i heard we need to make reservations within the next week.


Have you guys met/discussed this with Michele?  Please get me up to speed.
Thanks DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/24/2000
09:54 AM ---------------------------
   Michele Winckowski                08/17/2000 01:39 PM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Caithness Big Sandy, LLC. Project

As you are aware, Transwestern is working with a shipper to potentially
provide service to a new power plant located approximately 40 miles off the
mainline in Arizona.  Although, the final negotiation are not complete
certain options are being evaluated, I need some assistance in interpreting
the regulations regarding the authority we should use for approval of this
project.

The facilities that would be constructed include a delivery point and
approximately 40 miles of pipe.  As these facilities are non-mainline, it may
be possible to construct the proposed facilities under the prior notice
provisions of TW's blanket certificate, provided the project satisfies the
blanket criteria (generally costs and environmental).

With this in mind, I have the following issues and questions:

Preliminarily, marketing is thinking that we may want to develop an
incremental rate  to recover the cost of the project.

Would a new incremental rate for this service impact our ability to file for
approval under the prior notice provisions?  Note: Generally, Subpart F of
Part 157 (blanket regulations) does not address service issues as
transportation service is provided under Part 284 of the Commission's
regulations.  However, the regulations (o157.204)  set forth Who may apply
for a blanket certificate.   The criteria includes, among other things, any
interstate pipeline that has rates accepted by the Commission.  Therefore,
would an incremental rate have to be approved by the Commission before the
proposed facilities would be blanket eligible?

Can a new incremental rate be established through a limit-section 4 rate
filing or is a case-specific certificate required?

As the facilities will not include any mainline expansion - Is an open season
required for the project?  My opinion is "NO".  Do you agree?

Your thoughts and assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks MW


If you're receiving this email its because we're still waiting on a response from you.  Please reply to this message ASAP.  See below for details.

Thanks,

Dan

We are in the process of confirming that all traders are set up correctly and ready to trade when the system goes live.

We need to make sure that your Stack Managers are accessing the correct database. In order to do this, we need to know how you access Stack Manager:

1) Through Terminal Server (the one that opens up a desktop within a desktop and it actually appears that you have two Start buttons).
or
2) By opening the Stack Manager directly from your "native" desktop (stand alone computer).

Please reply to this message with either a corresponding "1" or a "2" in the subject field.

If you're not sure which one you have, please contact myself x39673, Teresa Mandola x39807 or Jennifer McQuade x53614 and we'll come by your desk to help you.

Thank you,

Dan Diamond


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	kelley_doolan@platts.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	Re: confidentiality agreement

Hi Scott,

Thanks for sticking with this. Let me talk some of our folks here and I will get
you a McGraw-Hill legal counterpart to work with Jeff.

Best regards,
Kelley Doolan
202-383-2145

"Neal, Scott" <Scott.Neal@enron.com> on 11/02/2001 11:16:58 AM

 To:      Kelley Doolan/ST/FIS@FIS

 cc:      "Hodge, Jeffrey T." <Jeffrey.T.Hodge@enron.com>

 Subject: confidentiality agreement

Kelley,

I am writing to you to follow up on our discussion last week regarding
disclosure of counterparty names for price verification purposes.
Can you give me the name and contact information for the person within
your company that would work with us to put a Confidentiality Agreement
in place.
Jeff Hodge is our lawyer who will work on this for Enron.  Jeff can
contacted at 713 853-6911 or by email at jeffrey.t.hodge@enron.com.

Thanks for you assistance.

Scott Neal

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may
contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for
the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message.
This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an
acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract
between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


As you may know, we are trying to schedule an interview for Alex Tartakovski
in Houston this week.  I am copying everyone involved because i wont be able
to coordinate this tomorrow.  we just brought our new daughter home today and
my wife is yelling at me to get out of my office.

I just found out that Thursday & Friday are bad days for him, so Wednesday is
the only day to do it this week.  he would come down tuesday night and fly
out wednesday evening.  it's probably easiest for him to arrange his flight,
but he will need a hotel and transportation from the airport.  i gave him
donna's phone number for help. i assume the hyatt would be best.  his home
number is 215-702-3705 and during the day his cellular is 267-981-5425.

by way of background, i plan to bring in 3 people from outside the company to
fill in some of the "vacants" in my group's org chart.  the 3 areas of
specialization that are needed to execute the business plan are (1)
coordination of origination, (2) deal pricing and underwriting, and (3)
modeling and portfolio management.  alex is the perfect person for #3.  he
has the deepest knowledge of probability of anyone i know and is efficient at
building analysis models, which will be a big job in this business because
portfolio management needs to be redefined in real time due to the lumpiness
of insurance contracts and the lack of any historical methods for evaluating
these risks.  development of pricing models will be a joint effort between
"my" group and the research dept because this will need to draw on the
expertise in research as well as being a realtime activity as new deals are
being structured.  i want to encourage joint work between vasant / amitava
and alex because his background and expertise is compatible with research.
over the past 2 years, alex and i spent a lot of time developing new
electricity spot pricing methodology and this is one area where he excels.  i
would expect that he would be a valuable resource in research as well, and so
i would like for him to be able to meet with vince is possible.  (this could
possibly be done when vince is in philadelphia next week if there is time -
(?))  depending on what work needs to be done in the future, i could see him
working both on pricing research and this specific business unit.

i have attached alex's resume.  i assume he would be manager level, but i'm
not sure of this.
this doesnt necessarily come across in the resume, but the skills that are
useful to us are:
probability / statistical model development
development of theoretical pricing methodology
excellent computer programming skills
database development and data analysis
he has the best understanding of the NERC reliability data format outside of
Mike Curley, the NERC data manager.
designed and wrote the code for the pricing model used by Ace Power Products
for deal pricing and porfolio mgmt.
excellent understanding of options pricing methodology and its application to
hedging insurance portfolios.
if you want to get into superconductor trading, he can design the standards.
can beat me at Atari Battlezone (as well as being able to navigate a real
tank through a minefield).

one objective of this meeting in houston is to make him feel comfortable with
the organization (with which you did such a good job for me) and to give him
confidence that he will be able to do state-of-the-art pricing research in
the most innovative company in the world.  he is also interviewing for a job
in morgan stanley's equity dept.

we will also arrange a meeting with Per in NY, but i would like to be in the
office for that, so we can do that next week.

please call me @610-996-2522 if there are any questions.  i may not pick up
but i will reply to voicemail promptly. i'm up 24 hours this week anyway.

thanks,

-- Dave


Hey ...
Just wondering if you're at work ?  Get my message yesterday?
Angie

Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here


Let me make sure I understand this.  Prior to April 2002, the UDCs want their QF costs to be as low as possible, since this will cause the PX credit to be lower and thus the positive CTC higher.  However, beginning April 2002, they pray for just the opposite -- the greater their QF costs, the more they can collect from DA customers to help pay for the QFs.

I truly hope I have misunderstood you, else my brain may explode.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Mon 8/13/2001 5:08 PM
To: Swain, Steve; Mara, Susan
Cc:
Subject: One Other Note on Stranded Costs

Steve --

As Sue highlights below, when people talk about stranded costs ending no later than 3/31/02, they are only speaking about generation-related stranded costs.  Above market costs for QFs will be "collected" from DA customers for some time into the future.  Wanted to make sure that this was clear.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Mara, Susan
Sent:   Monday, August 13, 2001 12:27 PM
To:     Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Mellencamp, Lisa; Steffes, James D.; Ruffer, Mary Lynne; Tribolet, Michael; Huddleson, Diann

Cc:     Gorny, Vladimir; Bradford, William S.; Kingerski, Harry; Savage, Gordon; Tribolet, Michael
Subject:        RE: Summary or PX Credit Proposals

An update from the meeting we had with SCE on August 9:  SCE said that it has TEMPORARILY stopped charging CTC because it doesn't know what to charge for DWR. Meanwhile, it continues to keep track of the dollar flows through the TCBA and the new account set up for DWR.  Once the CPUC decides on the DWR's revenue requirement, SCE expects that it will charge generation-related CTC again.  There is also continuing CTC related to QF contracts that will return (and goes beyond 3/31/02) once QF contracts are above the "market".  SCE is also considering filing a petition with the CPUC to get guidance on all these matters. Once the CPUC rules on SCE"s advice letter approaches, SCE plans to go back and re-bill begining with Jan 18 (it used some different PX credit approaches early on and switched to this approach for bills going out June 4). I didn't ask the question about calculating CTC back to Jan 18.  I guess if the DWR rev req is retroactive and leaves room for CTC, they will bill it.  The other twist I had forgotten about is that they have a one-half cent charge added to the embedded gen rate of 10.27 cents (making it about 10.77 cents) that collects the $400 million that was uncollected while the CPUC played around with a rate design for the three cent surcharge.  The half cent addition is for 12 months.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Curry, Wanda
Sent:   Friday, August 10, 2001 8:51 AM
To:     Swain, Steve; Mellencamp, Lisa; Steffes, James D.; Ruffer, Mary Lynne; Tribolet, Michael; Huddleson, Diann; Mara, Susan

Cc:     Gorny, Vladimir; Bradford, William S.
Subject:        Summary or PX Credit Proposals

I wanted to summarize the conclusions from our meeting on Wednesday, August 8th.  Please let me know if I have misrepresented anything.

Below is a description of four proposals which may help resolve issues associated with PX credits or mitigate Enron's exposure to PX credits.  Steve Swain has the responsibility for evaluating each proposal, and his goal is to have recommendations for EWS/EES management on August 14th.

Current Issues:
1)  The methodology for calculating PX credits after January 18 is undetermined (SCE and PG&E have implemented different methodologies)

2)  Applicability of the 1 cent surcharge to direct access customers (PG&E is passing thru to DA customers, SCE is not)
3)  Impact to Enron if  FERC implements  retroactive changes to the CAL PX clearing prices from Oct 2, 2000 thru January 18th which result in revised PX credits

4)  Recoupment of outstanding PX credits against future payments for T&D
5)  Uncertainty surrounding future tariffs (CTC or other pass through charges), making it difficult to hedge price risk in forward positions

6)  Large uncollected receivables from both PG&E and SCE

The four proposals are as follows:

SCE Recommended Approach
        This approach assumes no PX (or PE) credit effective from January 18, 2001 forward.  Mary Lynne and Diann will work with Steve to quantify the  gross PX receivable (as billed by each utility)  which would  be reversed.   This approach will ensure that only charges for T&D (no    generation/commodity costs, CTC charges, or surcharges for CDWR, including the 1 cent)  will be applicable to Direct Access customers.

        Enron would request the following:
        1) Assurances that no surcharges for CDWR will be passed through to EES or EEMC
        2) SCE will support our historical PX  credit receivable as an "allowable claim" at a minimum and would provide additional credit support if possible.

        3) PG&E will support Enron's recoupment argument
        4) Both utilities will immediately reinstate the Cumulative Credit Balances on utility bills and agree to a netting arrangement at the utility parent   level.

        5) Both utilities agree to not adjust the historical PX credits, if/when an adjustment of historical PX clearing prices is mandated by FERC

        Other consideration:
        Ability to hedge price risk in the retail portfolio, without concern re CTC or other surcharge amounts.

PG&E Recommended Approach
        This approach assumes the PX calculation methodology effective January 18, 2001 would include an "avoided cost"  component.  This avoided cost

        component would include, owned generation, QF purchases, actual CDWR purchases for the utility, bilateral purchase contracts, and ISO purchases.        This resulting "avoided cost" would be used in lieu of the PX clearing price in the old PX formula through March, 2002.    If the actual CDWR purchase  costs are not included, then the surcharge (along with the embedded gen costs)  should be included in the calculation.

        Enron would request the following:
        Same as above

        Other Consideration:
        Enron  would continue to be exposed to "price" risk attributable to the actions of the utility at a minimum through March, 2002.  This would hamper     Enron's ability         to hedge the positions in the retail portfolio.

Hybrid Approach
        This approach assumes that the PG&E approach is applicable from January 18, 2001 through September 1, 2001 and that the SCE approach is         applicable from September 1st forward.   This approach might be necessary as a compromise for both utilities to provide their support of the proposal.

        Enron would request the following:
        Same as SCE and PG&E approach

        Other considerations:
        Ability to hedge price risk in the retail portfolio, without concern re CTC or other surcharge amounts.

Enron Model
        This approach assumes we continue to support a market based (NP15 and SP15) calculation methodology for the PX credit.

        Enron would request the following:
        It is unlikely we would receive any level of cooperation from either PG&E and SCE.   The consensus from legal, regulatory, and EWS commercial is        the probability of getting this approach approved is low.   However, understanding this amount, at a minimum, can be used to help defend the "value"    Enron is foregoing in order to reach agreement with the utilities and CPUC.

        Other considerations:
        This approach would give Enron the ability to hedge "price" risk, but this is somewhat offset with  incremental credit exposure associated with the     actual collection of the PX credit.

Again, please let me know if this does not clearly represent what we concluded in Wednesday's meeting.

Thanks,
Wanda Curry


FYI, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebeau, Randy
Sent:	Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:07 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Jordan, Fred
Cc:	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Subject:	RE: TW Question in Amarillo

Thanks for the info.
Fred, do you know how much it will take to upgrade the ESD system?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:56 PM
To:	Lebeau, Randy
Cc:	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Subject:	RE: TW Question in Amarillo

Randy,

Mansoor and I met on this topic this morning.  We are confirming with Perry Frazier what, if any, firm commitments we may have on this system to make sure we understand possible impacts of abandoning this station.  Also, we will meet with the regulatory folks this week to discuss the various regulatory options with them.  We will keep you updated as we progress through these meetings.

How much money is required on the Ivanhoe station to keep ESD compliant?

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebeau, Randy
Sent:	Friday, March 01, 2002 10:42 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Cc:	Jordan, Fred
Subject:	FW: TW Question in Amarillo

Kim, regarding the question below pertaining to the abandonment of units at Ivanhoe, what do we need to do next?  We are currently out of compliance on the ESD system and would like to get the ball rolling as soon as possible.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Steven
Sent:	Friday, March 01, 2002 10:33 AM
To:	Lebeau, Randy
Subject:	RE: TW Question in Amarillo

Thanks for the feedback. Kim Watson is the appropriate person to talk to on this.
Steve

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebeau, Randy
Sent:	Friday, March 01, 2002 10:26 AM
To:	Harris, Steven
Subject:	TW Question in Amarillo

This is just to follow up on the phone message I left for you today (Friday, March 1).

The questions raised in the employee meeting with Stan Horton in Amarillo this week regarding gas that has gone off the system, had to do with NNG facilities not TW.
 As I stated in the voice mail, we do have an issue at the Ivanhoe station.  The HP there has not run in several years, but as long as it's in place, we are required to maintain the ESD system.  We would like to pursue the abandonment in place of the units.  If we don't do this, we are looking at some significant costs to make repairs and upgrades to the system.  Our question is, who do we need to work with on this effort?

Thanks for following up so quickly after Stan's visit.
Randy


Gilian,

No, we don't  additional need more data. I understand Stinson Gibner has
already sent you a reply with
his findings.

Vince

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Arthur Andersen model validation request

Vince,

Was the data we provided sufficient to determine whether the Global Markets
book administrator correctly utilized the spread option model?  Please let me
know if there are any additional data requirements.

Thank you again for your assistance.

Gillian Boyer
x30968

---------------------- Forwarded by Gillian Boyer/AA/Corp/Enron on 12/18/2000
01:39 PM ---------------------------

Gillian Boyer
11/27/2000 10:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Arthur Andersen model validation request

Vince,

                  Our goal is to validate that the Enron Global Market book
administrators are accurately using the "spread option model" as developed by
the Research Group.    To determine this, we would like to provide you with
the inputs for a particular deal (as provided by a Global Markets book
administrator) and have you recalculate the deal value.   We will then
compare your results to the values calculated by Global Markets.

 Two Koch deals have been chosen due to their substantial P/L effect.  I have
attached the deal data in two forms: (1) the spread option model that Kara
Boudreau, Book Administrator EGM, provided and (2) an excel spreadsheet that
isolates the 2 deals.

 If there is anything more that we could provide, please don't hesitate to
call me at  x30968.

 Thank you so much for all of your help.

 Gillian

1.

2.


where didn't i go?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:24 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

where did you go?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:25 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

no really.  it was a blast.  little tired but i can rally for tonight.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:21 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   liar

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:22 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   i didn't even go home

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:19 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      great, you don't stand a chance.  i didn't get home until 5:30 this
      morning
      and i think i was still drunk when i got to work. how about you?

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
      Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 11:58 AM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject:

      how are we doing on our contest?

   **********************************************************************
      This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
   affiliate
      and
      may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
   the
      intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
   by
      others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
   (or
      authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
   or
      reply
      to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
      all
      copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
   not
      intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
   evidence
      a
      binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
      affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
   not
      be
      relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
   otherwise.
      Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886