Add the demand to the commodity, that's comes out to $.0505, there is your
nickle.  However, being that we work for a marketing company and recognize
the value of fuel, we take that into consideration.  The pipelines don't
usually.

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           07/24/2000 01:08 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Firm transport to TRANSCO-Young Womans Creek

I thought that Carolyn Turner  said her minimum would be a nickel??????

Chris Germany@ECT
07/24/2000 10:36 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Firm transport to TRANSCO-Young Womans Creek

Bids close at 9:00 am on the 26th.  The start date is the 27th.  Currently
there are no bids ( Scott and I will get with Dick this afternoon).  The min
demand is $1.0587 which works out to be about $.035 per dth.  The commodity
is $.0155 (no GRI) and fuel is around $.09 at $4.00.

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           07/24/2000 08:55 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Firm transport to TRANSCO-Young Womans Creek

Chris,
What is the status?
John


-----Original Message-----
From:  "Cagle, Donna" <DCAGLE@mariner-energy.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Cagle+2C+20Donna+22+20+3CDCAGLE+40mariner-energy+2Ecom+3
E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:43 PM
To: Edison, Deborah J.
Cc: Melendrez, Jesus
Subject: Mariner Management Meeting Minutes

 <<6-6-01.doc>>  <<SUMMARY.xls>>

Donna M. Cagle
Executive Administrator to President & CEO
Mariner Energy, Inc.
580 WestLake Park Blvd., Suite 1300
Houston, TX  77079
281/584-5511 (phone)     281/584-5515 (fax)
dcagle@mariner-energy.com

 - 6-6-01.doc
 - SUMMARY.xls


i am free for drinks after work but have dinner plans

Caroline Abramo@ENRON
02/12/2001 01:28 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: dinner

ok- no wednesday night- ha ha

could you do thursday??


We have another new addition to the Portland West Desk.  Beginning today,
Craig Dean has joined the Real-Time Trading group.

Prior to Enron, Craig worked as a statistics Intern at US West, a Financial
Advisor with H&R Block, and most recently, as a Financial Advisor at Morgan
Stanley. He is a '96 graduate of Washington State University with a degree in
Accounting and Finance.

Please welcome Craig to our Portland Office!


WCom used the same number wherever possible but sometimes had to change it by using one or two different numbers.   Your new card is correct.
Carolyn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Saturday, October 20, 2001 2:00 PM
To:	Graham, Carolyn
Subject:	WorldCom Calling Card

Caroly,

I am confirming that I have received my new WorldCom calling card.  The account number on the WorldCom card is two digits off of my ATT Calling card.  Are they supposed to be the same?

Last four digits ATT card:  9827
Last four digits WorldCom card:  9829

Please advise.

Thanks, Kim.


As you know, current firm contracts on Transwestern provide for delivery of
250 MMcf/d of gas to Topock.  In the context of the Gallup Expansion,
Transwestern has entered into firm contracts for an additional 40 MMcf/d to
Topock.  Once the Gallup expansion is built, Transwestern will have a total
of 290 MMcf/d of firm capacity under contract to the Topock delivery point:
40 MMcf/d more than PG&E has agreed to accept while PCBs continue to be
present.

Bill Cordes has asked what Transwestern's potential liability to shippers
would be if PG&E's refusal to accept deliveries due to the continued presence
of contaminants causes Transwestern to have to curtail firm service at
PG&E/Topock.  The legal answer is that Transwestern's tariff provides for a
reservation charge refund but does not limit the damages that could be sought
by a shipper.

More specifically, Rate Schedule FTS-1 specifically provides for a
reservation charge refund if Transwestern fails to deliver gas for a firm
shipper.  In December, January, February, July and August, the shipper is
entitled to a reservation charge refund for all nominated and confirmed
quantities not delivered.  In all other months, the shipper is entitled to a
refund only if deliveries fall below 75% of nominated/confirmed quantities
for a period of 75 consecutive days. The tariff does not preclude a shipper
from seeking other damages resulting from Transwestern's failure to provide
service under an FTS-1 contract.  A shipper whose firm service is curtailed
would likely incur damages in addition to the reservation charge, including,
for example, the cost of buying spot gas or damages resulting from the
shipper's inability to fulfill contractual obligations. Such damages could be
recovered in a breach of contract action.  Not all shippers would incur such
damages because some might be willing to take delivery of gas at alternate
points if capacity is available at such points.

Bill has asked Steve to work with me in quantifying our potential exposure.
I could really use your help in putting a dollar amount on potential
damages.  Can we meet briefly to discuss this?  I'm available after the
Gallup meeting tomorrow a.m., or after lunch on Friday...or we can discuss a
meeting time for next week.  Thank you.


As requested.

Linda Guinn
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6104
(713) 646-3393 (fax)


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2001
08:41 AM ---------------------------

"The Power Marketing Association" <pma-marketplace@mgfairfax.rr.com> on
04/04/2001 04:51:16 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: Platts Energy Trader-Special Rate

Dear Energy Professional:

We hope you enjoyed your recent free trial to Platts Energy Trader, which
provides comprehensive daily coverage of both electricity and natural gas
markets, along with such unique features as forward price assessments, spark
spreads and regular outage tables.

Though your trial has ended, you still have a chance to save $500 off the
regular rate of $1,995 by becoming a charter subscriber.

To subscribe, please fill out and return the attached form, or call our sales
department at 877-286-8897 or 212-904-2004; e-mail, info@platts.com. Be sure
to mention the charter rate.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Richard Schwartz
Marketing Director

 - et040401.pdf


Just a reminder that when entering a wheel, the Interchange ID must be the same for the import and export.  When the Import is labeled as "EPMI_CISO_**" and the Export as "CISO_EPMI_**," the ISO views these as unique imports and exports.  They will not be linked together for a wheel, thus causing ancillary services charges to occur.

Thank you!


If you have not sent me a current project list within the last week, please do so no later than noon tomorrow using the attached format.

Mark Taylor
Vice President and General Counsel
Enron Wholesale Services
(713)853-7459


Greetings from Amazon.com.  Thanks for updating the shipping
address for your order #107-7339612-5270104 to:

     Eric P. Bass
     1400 Smith St.
     Houston, TX
     77002

     Phone Number: 713-853-0977

Your order will be paid using the credit card number that
you provided.

When your order is shipped, we will send you an e-mail message
confirming the date, contents, and method of your shipment.

Please note that you can supply a different shipping address
each time a new order is placed, or simply select from any
address previously used with your account.  If you requested
any additional changes to this order, you will receive a separate
e-mail to confirm those changes.

Thanks for shopping at Amazon.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Amazon.com
Earth's Biggest Selection
http://www.amazon.com/
orders@amazon.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------


We should resurrect Mike Smith's note and get him on the call in the attempt to avoid recreating the wheel on this one.  I can dig it up if you'd like.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	CALIFORNIA VIEW - Ability to Extend
Importance:	High

Sue and Jeff --

I am having a meeting with Vicki and Janet Dietrich on Thursday to discuss our view on the ability to extend our current contracts in CA (for customers already on DA).  Can we discuss this today or soon thereafter.

My take is that the UDCs will be indifferent to this (maybe?) and our #1 priority is to work to get the PG&E model adopted across the state.  Any news on how SCE and SDG&E will move forward?

Thanks.


Charles Bradley & Sally Scott
10802 Jaycreek
Houston, TX 77070

I'll try giving you a call tonight just to catch up and see how things are going.  Were you planning on going walking?

Sue

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jennifer Bowles" <jkbowles@hotmail.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jennifer+20Bowles+22+20+3Cjkbowles+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 11:30 AM
To:	sscott5@enron.com
Subject:	Sooo....

... KOREA!?!?!  Eh?  Well, no can say your life isn't exciting!  Wow, I
can't wait to hear about it!

I got your message Saturday.  I was in Austin and Matt and I were actually
registering at Breed & Co. when you called... sorry I missed you!

No worries about the music... we just need to get together soon!  AND, no
worries about the bachelorette party... I would definitely say Korea's
slightly more enticing! :o)

When you have a minute could I get your dad's full name and your parent's
address?

Thanks friend -- I HOPE to hear from you soon!

Love,

Jen

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Stinson,

Can you read the attached?

Vince


I will give you a call in about 20 minutes. O.K.?

From: Sara Shackleton on 06/27/2000 09:58 AM
To: Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Media General/Notice of Exercise

please call.  I'd like copy of final Media General.  Also, we need to discuss
the notice.  sara


I'm low on clean clothes...I need to think if I have something to wear!

Gabriel Monroy
12/13/2000 05:14 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: I'm Safe Now

I remember when I was Looking for an apartment the locator always made a sale
pitch on the fireplace. I always said I didn't care. This is the time  when
you regret that, but anyways.   I first thought of just going to dinner, then
I thought of maybe doing something else.  Now, I don't know anything.  Why
do  you need to know if we do something else?   Do you worry you might go to
bed a little late?   I do not want you to not get a good sleep just because
of my birthday!!

I'll keep thinking. I will be here and probably will not go to my french
class. I need to finish something and would rather skip french that be
working here after class.

Gabriel

Robin Rodrigue
12/13/2000 04:22 PM
To: Gabriel Monroy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: I'm Safe Now

So are you thinking going to dinner or something else?  I need to know if you
just can decide on a resturant or you can decide on what to do?  And if you
want to do something other than eat you need to let me know.

We could just curl up in front of the fireplace...oh wait neither of us have
a fireplace.  Guess we'll have to think of something else.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/02/2000 05:22
PM ---------------------------

jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com on 06/02/2000 05:12:32 PM
To: Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, Steve.Irvin.ECT@enron.com,
Manuel.Cavazos@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: john.schroeder@ps.ge.com

Subject: RE: GE Contract

Folks,
We should not be making changes like this at this time.  This clause was
part of the document (terms & conditions) initialed a month ago.
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Brian D Barto [mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]
Sent:   Friday, June 02, 2000 2:31 PM
To:   Steve Irvin; Manuel Cavazos; Kay Mann
Cc:   Jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com; John.Schroeder@ps.ge.com
Subject:   Re: GE Contract

His issues need to be communicated directly to Jeffrey Smith at GE so
Jeffrey
Smith can tie in his tax advisors.  Please follow up with this as I am fully
occupied with Genpower for the next few days.   PS  I have asked Kay Mann to
lend a hand closing out the Consolidation Agreement too.

To:   Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject:  GE Contract

I tried to calling you on your phone, but it does not seem to bew working
right.
Jeff Blumenthal from tax has some final issues we need to discuss in section
5.2.4 of the contract and he will be sending an e-mail describing those
issues
later this morning.  That is the last remaining issue I am aware of before
we
can finalize and sign this contract, unless anything has poipped up the over
the
last couple days from GE. Can we meet this afternoon to arrange the signing
of
this contract with GE.
Please call me back at 3-9548 and let me know.

Thanks,

Steve


I have friends who have no jobs or do not have to work at their jobs,
therefore they can surf all day long and find good jokes.  Those are two of
my favorites as well.
PL


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 01:05
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
10/06/2000 01:00 PM
To: Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angie
Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: PL1 Operations - VNG Asset Management

Chat with Sean, I don't know if the room is big enough for everyone.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 12:58
PM ---------------------------

Sean Boyle@ENRON
10/04/2000 10:06 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: PL1 Operations - VNG Asset Management

The meeting with Cynthia Ellis of Dominion has been pushed to 10/6/00 @ 3:00
PM.

Cythia Ellis of Dominion Transmission will be visiting Enron 10/5/00 at 3:00
PM to discuss the operations of the PL1 and "Joint Use" pipeline systems with
respect to the imminent VNG deal.  I have scheduled conference room 3269 for
1 hour.

Thanks,
Sean


How can you sell Enron for $9.50 per share?  We've already lost almost everything we have in our 401k and the only hope to recover anything is if Enron can battle back.  Is the company in such poor shape that it can't survive on its own?  If so, how did that happen?


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	William Hogan <william_hogan@harvard.edu>@EES
Sent:	Saturday, October 27, 2001 9:11 AM
To:	ER:;@ENRON
Subject:	Fwd: RTO Week Summary from FERC Staff

FYI.
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.5.1
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 17:27:13 -0400
From: rob.gramlich@ferc.fed.us
To: William_Hogan@harvard.edu
Subject: Please comment
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Oct 2001 21:27:10.0865 (UTC) FILETIME=[F8E60810:01C15E64]
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on KSGMTA/KSG(Release 5.0.3 |March 21, 2000) at 10/26/2001
 05:31:13 PM,
        Serialize by Router on KSGMTA/KSG(Release 5.0.3 |March 21, 2000) at  10/26/2001
 05:31:14 PM,
        Serialize complete at 10/26/2001 05:31:14 PM
Bill,
Please send this around as a way to organize comments on FERC standard market design.  We are working on a better web posting method here.
Thanks!
Rob
 http://www.ferc.gov/Electric/RTO/workshops/staffsummary.pdf
William W. Hogan
John F. Kennedy School of Government
Harvard University
79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
617-495-1317 (o)
617-495-1635 (f)
email: william_hogan@harvard.edu
web page: www.whogan.com
orhttp://www.ksg.harvard.edu/whogan


Attached are clean and marked copies of the termsheet and letter of
interest.  Please feel free to contact me if you have any comments or
questions.


Another (small) deal closed.  Congrats to Marcelo.  We'll book the position once the contract is signed.

Remi
---------------------- Forwarded by Remi Collonges/SA/Enron on 06/07/2001 07:06 AM ---------------------------

Marcelo Parodi
06/06/2001 07:42 PM
To:	Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, David M Rosenberg/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Roderick Blackham/SA/Enron@Enron, Elio Kumoto/SA/Enron@Enron, Karla Azevedo/SA/Enron@Enron
Subject:	PCH deal verbally closed

After one month of negotiations, we received today a verbal closing from PCH Salto Lobo, under the following conditions:

plant location	: Brotas (SP) - CPFL territory
power amount	: up to 1.5 MW (interruptible)
pricing and term:
Jan 02 - Dec 03	: R$90/MWh
Jan 04 - Dec 06	: R$67/MWh
delivery point	: SE center of gravity (Salto Lobo pays for T&D and we take the T losses)

Karla, since this deal will fall under the non-firm, non-MAE member type of structure, I'll take the initiative to fill the draft contract and send you for legal approval.

I would like to stress the key role that Elio Kumoto played on this deal. The deal originally came to Enron through him and Elio actively participated on the negotiation and technical assessment of the plant.

Rds,

Marcelo


Sandy,

Attached is a draft of the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for your
review.  Please note the exhibits re guaranties are not attached as they are
still being finalized.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Chris,

I am sending you the file I was working on for John Lavorato if he asks about it while I am at the dentist.

If he wants another printout I've put it on your desk, otherwise I am gonna be back around 11.

Vladi


The recovery system continues to produce too much water in spite of using
product skimmers attached to the pumps. The problem is that product is
forming an emulsion with water and the emulsion is recovered by the skimmers.
Unfortunately the emulsion is more water than product. I believe this problem
can be eliminated by using a different type of pump. The current pump system,
manufactured by Marshalk, uses air to displace the product from the pump. We
have been using a bladder pump fitted with a skimmer attachment, manufactured
by Clean Environment Equipment, at Bell Lake and at Ivanhoe with very good
success (and no emulsion problems). I have ordered three replacement pumps
and skimmers (CEE GNE-24) to replace the three Marshalk pumps. I will have
Clayton shut-down the recovery system until we can install the replacement
pumps. This should take about 3-4 weeks.


Attached is the due diligence review summary prepared by the legal asset
groups for the West Texas Assets at the KN Data Room.  Steve is continuing to
review the information on the gathering/processing portion and we will update
as info is available.


Business:
                                                             Spago
                                                      Address:
                                                             265 Lytton Ave
                                                             Palo Alto, CA 94301
                                                       Phone:
                                                             650-833-1000
                                                         Fax:
                                                             650-321-2948


Renee-

I understand your need to incorporate the actual changes into the change
order itself as opposed to an attachment.    After reading GE's (Jeff
Darst's) document, I can't easily extract from it what you need.  I need to
write something from scratch.  Instead of trading several emails with
yourself and Jeff Darst, it would be more efficient for me to give Jeff a
call myself to come up with something acceptable to the both of us which also
meets your requirements below.  (I'm thinking that the actual scope items
should be in your change order and GE's requirements/recommendations for the
future modifications can be attached -- Much the same way their standard
specs are attached to a purchase contract. )

I'm in Austin today and tomorrow (Thursday) and will be back in the office on
Friday.  If you can't wait, or need to talk to me before that, give me a call
on my cell phone (713) 412-6873.

Hope this helps.
Eric

Renee Alfaro
02/14/2001 07:19 AM
To: Eric Booth/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@Enron_Development, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Blue Dog Max, comments on draft CO # 1

Eric,

I need to incorporate the essential parts of what Jeff Darst refers to as
Attachment 2 below (91209_14 Jul 2000_Chiller Provisions.doc) into the Change
Order, not as an attachment.  This Attachment contains specifications as to
what they are providing as well as stipulations as to how we are to install
the inlet chillers.  I need to know which are the specifications as to what
they are providing and how the scope is being changed.  I'm not concerned
with their recommendations of how we are to install the inlet chillers since
that is our scope and our liability/warranty.

Please separate out the scope items that need to be included in the Change
Order and provide me with the wording so that I may get another draft of this
Change Order out for review.

If you want to get together to discuss, please give me a call.

Thanks
Renee Alfaro
Phone: 713-646-7281
Fax: 713-646-6158
Email: ralfaro@enron.com

	jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com
	02/13/2001 11:03 AM

		 To: bbarto@enron.com
		 cc: chasecl@pssch.ps.ge.com
		 Subject: Blue Dog Max, comments on draft CO # 1

Brian,

Attached are our comments to your draft of CO #1.  Our proposed attachment 2
is attached (this is from my e-mail to Eric dated July 14, 2000).

We are still looking for a copy of the Consent to Assignment.

>  <<Chgs. to draft CO#1,rev.7, 2-12-01.doc>>  <<91209_14 Jul 2000_Chiller
> Provisions.doc>>
>
Thanks,

Jeff
Global Power Plant Systems
518-385-0663
518-381-1513 (fax)

 - Chgs. to draft CO#1,rev.7, 2-12-01.doc
 - 91209_14 Jul 2000_Chiller Provisions.doc


I think it is a good opportunity to promote standardized contracts.  Mark

	Ruth Ainslie <RAinslie@isda.org>
	02/10/2001 05:07 PM

		 To: Mark Haedicke <Mark.E.Haedicke@enron.com>
		 cc: Robert Pickel <RPICKEL@isda.org>
		 Subject: March 6 Energy Conference:  Press

Mark-

We have been discussing whether to have a press breakfast or other press
contacts in Houston for the March 6 conference.  We think there could be
some interesting media coverageand press interest.

I look forward to your thoughts and would be happy to have a short call to
explore further Monday. Please advise.

Thanks and regards, Ruth


Dear Brothers,
It was good to see everyone make the trek to central Oklahoma to launch
Dent's book.  The Daily Oklahoman published a brief story that suggested Dent
had made up a bunch of lies about Saint Bud Wilkinson steppin out on the old
lady.  Around here, that's like saying the Pope likes it up the ass.
Needless to say, the Sooner faithful were slightly chapped and the university
canceled their offer to host the signing party at our new museum.  Fuck 'em.
Who wants to drink beer in a dusty old museum anyway?
     Del, sorry I couldn't make the party but I did get to see Cdie, Grumbles
, Strange, Woody, Benson, PP, and Space for dinner.  My favorite part was the
full-volume discussion of who had the biggest penis (next to Benson, of
course).  Typical urology shit.  The family next to us failed to recognize a
medical discussion amongst professionals.  Speaking of Benson, he was worried
that his erections might crater all of a sudden just like his near vision has
recently done.  I assured him that this was extremely unlikely but, in his
case, he'd better hope that his cardiac output remains high or else he's
liable to pass out every time he gets a hard on.

                                                                     B. Miller

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/zoU8wD/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/Vk9qlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Thanks for forwarding Peter's resume.  By copy of this memo I am forwarding
Peter's resume to Danny McCarty and Phil Lowry.  Danny and Phil: Please
follow-up with Vince if you have an interest in meeting with Peter.  He seems
to be a very qualified candidate.

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
04/30/2001 02:28 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Follow-up on SIAM Workshop

I am forwarding for your attention the resume of Peter Percell
who has an extensive experience in modeling physical flows
of natural gas in pipeline systems. Peter is looking currently for a job.

I met him last week at the meeting of the Science and Industry Advance with
Mathematics
society at the University of Houston.

The application of recent developments in optimization theory
and numerical methods can help Enron to improve further
efficiency of our pipeline system and reduce the consumption of compressor
fuel.

Please, let me know if you interested in introducing Peter to executives
in your organization. I shall be glad to make arrangements for an interview.

Vince Kaminski

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
02:17 PM ---------------------------

Peter Percell <percell@swbell.net> on 04/30/2001 11:16:58 AM
To: Vincent Kaminski <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Follow-up on SIAM Workshop

I enjoyed your presentation, and meeting you briefly afterwards, at the
SIAM Workshop last Friday.

I have extensive experience as a technical leader in the design and
development of modeling and simulation software products, mostly
for the oil and gas pipeline industry.

I am looking for a position that can utilize my software development and
mathematical skills.  Getting out of the narrow confines of the pipeline
simulation industry would be a plus.

Please consider whether I might fit in your group.  Your answer to a
question indicated that I have several of the skills you look for.

Also, please let me know, by email, the names and contact information of
other managers within Enron who might benefit from having someone with
my qualifications in their group.

Attached are my resume and an addendum covering academic & consulting
experience.  Publications are available on request.

I will call you in a couple of days to follow up on this email.

Thank you for your time.

Peter Percell                        10030 Doliver Drive
percell@swbell.net               Houston, TX 77042-2016
(713) 532-3836 voice & fax
 - Percell, Peter Resume Only.doc
 - Percell, Peter A&C Exp.doc


Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 8:47 AM
To: Jacoby, Ben
Cc: Deffner, Joseph; Duran, W. David; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann;
Schneider, Chip; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: GE Turbines

I think Ben's time frame is realistic. I assume we will enter into an
assignment and assumption agreement with Sithe, to which GE will consent. In
addition, we may need an override letter to the turbine contract to address
the E-Next/accounting issues. GE is familiar with what we need in for E-Next,
which should help expedite matters.

Kay

From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 07:55 PM
To: Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, W David
Duran/ENRON@enronXgate, Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate, Roseann
Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate, Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa
Bills/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: GE Turbines

I've been told that we need to resubmit a non-binding expression of interest
by Tuesday. Previously, we submitted a one page non-binding letter indicating
that the FMV of the units is $44 MM each. You raise a good point in that we
should be prepared to say (again, on a non-binding basis) how long we will
need to close (in addition to increasing the bid on the units). I think if
our number is good, 30 - 45 days for documentation and close would work, but
I think we should also be willing to post some non-refundable $s within say,
2 weeks on the basis of an exclusivity agreement with Sithe.

The group's thoughts on this would be appreciated.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Deffner, Joseph
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:56 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Mann, Kay; Duran, W. David; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf,
Roseann; Schneider, Chip; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: GE Turbines

What is expected for the Tuesday bid? I would guess the most critical from a
timing perspective will be a response centered on price and
commercial/technical issues. Michael indicates below he would like a
timetable for internal approvals to a closing. Do we have any indication how
pressed he is to close and fund versus agreeing on economic terms quickly and
allowing us to review the form of contract to ensure compliance with
accounting and finance guidlelines along the lines of our discussion earlier
this week? Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jacoby, Ben
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 5:59 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Schneider, Chip; Bills, Lisa; Manis, Herman; Engeldorf, Roseann
Cc: Booth, Chris; Rose, Steven; Virgo, Robert; Duran, W. David
Subject: FW: GE Turbines

All:

FYI, tomorrow I should receive turbine contracts for the 3 GE 7FAs being sold
by Site. Please see the e-mail below from Sithe's advisor regarding the
transaction schedule. Kay and I plan to initially review the contract, and I
have a technical team (Booth / Rose) ready to review the contracts as well.

From an accounting / finance perspective, I am interested in how we should
proceed given the circumstances. Kay and my initial plan is to review the
contracts from a technical / legal / commercial perspective and submit a
revised indicative number by Tuesday in consultation with Duran. Between now
and then, it would be helpful to know from accounting / finance how we should
proceed given that we are in a bidding situation (with I'm told three other
bidders). Herman / Rose / Lisa - please let me know your thoughts on this.

Chip - I would like Chris Booth to work with you on putting a draft DASH
together.

In the meantime, I will forward turbine contracts to everyone as soon as I
receive them.

Regards,

Ben

 -----Original Message-----
From:  MKolman@rcgroup.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-MKolman+40rcgroup+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:40 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com
Subject: Re: GE Turbines

Ben:

Per our conversation today, the turbine contract and LTSA are being sent
via Fed Ex to your office in Houston.

Final bids are due next Tuesday, June 5th via fax to 781-270-0055.  Bids
should include best price and a closing schedule (date by which bidder will
have all internal approvals necessary to enter into a binding agreement
with Seller subject only to consent from GE).

Thanks again for you patience and please call me if you have any questions,

Michael

================
Michael A. Kolman
Principal
Navigant Capital
(781) 564-9774 (direct)


See previous email.
----- Forwarded by Brad Richter/Enron Communications on 03/05/01 08:25 AM
-----

	Radu Tutos
	03/02/01 07:00 PM

		 To: Brad Richter/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Brad Nebergall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Rice issue - update

Brad,

I just talked with Brad Nebergall, and he mentioned that he called Farrell
Gerbode, our counterpart at Rice, who confirmed that it was a
misunderstanding.  He will talk with Farrell's boss as well, to make sure
that the situation is clarified with the Rice President.  In the meantime
we're working to put together a deal for Rice to make a circuit available
sooner.

have a good weekend,

Radu Tutos
Director, TDS
Enron Broadband Services
office  713-853-3990
cell     713-304-7602


[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

   Market  Watch   [IMAGE] Largest  Short Postition Decreases    [IMAGE] Largest  Short Postition Increases   [IMAGE] Lock-up  Expiry Dates   [IMAGE] IPO  Quiet Periods Expiries   [IMAGE] IPO  Withdrawals    [IMAGE] Analyst  EPS Change - Upside   [IMAGE] Analyst  EPS Change - Downside    [IMAGE] Highest  Analyst Activity    [IMAGE] Earnings  Calendar - This Week    [IMAGE] Upcoming  Splits    [IMAGE] Stock  Splits    [IMAGE] Coverage  Initiation   [IMAGE] Coverage  Re-Iteration      HelpDesk  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe    [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile   [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE]Add  / Edit Alerts   [IMAGE]View  My Alerts       [IMAGE]           	  As requested, your News Alert for QCOM  follows from EquityAlert.com.    ProBusiness Gives QUALCOMM More Time and Control With Outsourced Payroll Service   PLEASANTON, Calif., Jun 6, 2001 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- ProBusiness Services, Inc. (Nasdaq: PRBZ) Who wouldn't enjoy more time and control? ProBusiness is bringing both to QUALCOMM Incorporated (Nasdaq: QCOM), providing outsourced payroll processing services and Web-based self-services. A 2001 FORTUNE 500(R) company, QUALCOMM is an industry leader in developing and delivering innovative digital wireless communications products.   "Since implementing this service, ProBusiness has provided the technology and expertise needed to help streamline our payroll process and improve our reporting capability," said Mary Pope, manager of accounting for QUALCOMM. "ProBusiness allows us to gain control over our data and experience the service levels that we require to make this outsourcing relationship successful."   Industry-leading companies like QUALCOMM commonly experience high growth rates and rapid changes across the enterprise. Entrusting payroll processing activities to ProBusiness lets them align with industry best practices and leverage technology and high service levels to improve control over employee data and save payroll professionals' time.   QUALCOMM will soon implement ProBusiness Web-based services. With a majority of its employees using direct deposit, Web-based services will fit well with QUALCOMM's technology-dependent operations. Features such as viewing paychecks and W2s online can help reduce inquiries to in-house staff and boost employee satisfaction.   About QUALCOMM Incorporated   QUALCOMM Incorporated (www.qualcomm.com) is a leader in developing and delivering innovative digital wireless communications products and services based on the Company's Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) digital technology. The Company's business areas include CDMA integrated circuits and system software; technology licensing; the Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless(TM) (BREW(TM)) applications platform; Eudora(R) e-mail software; digital cinema systems; and satellite-based systems including portions of the Globalstar(TM) system and wireless fleet management systems, OmniTRACS(R) and OmniExpress(TM). QUALCOMM owns patents that are essential to all of the CDMA wireless telecommunications standards that have been adopted or proposed for adoption by standards-setting bodies worldwide. QUALCOMM has licensed its essential CDMA patent portfolio to more than 100 telecommunications equipment manufacturers worldwide. Headquartered in San Diego, Calif., QUALCOMM is included in the S? 500 Index and is a 2001 FORTUNE 500(R) company traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market(R) under the ticker symbol QCOM.   About ProBusiness Services Inc.   ProBusiness Services, Inc. (www.probusiness.com) is a leading provider of outsourced employee administrative services that streamline processes, reduce administrative costs and improve service levels to the enterprise. The company's comprehensive payroll, payroll tax filing, benefits administration, HR, Shared Services and Web-based self-service solutions simplify critical business processes for large employers nationwide. ProBusiness can provide either back-office processing services or end-to-end process outsourcing through its Employee Service Center which handles both employee inquiries and departmental administration.   ProBusiness was named one of the fastest-growing technology companies in the Deloitte & Touche Silicon Valley "Fast 50" and the National "Fast 500" every year since 1998. CIO magazine recognized ProBusiness for customer service excellence with a CIO-100 award in 2000. Its revenues for fiscal 2000 totaled $104.1 million, an increase of 48 percent from $70.1 million for fiscal year 1999. ProBusiness focuses on meeting the complex needs of large employers with comprehensive outsourced employee administrative services, and its clients include blue chip companies from all industries.   NOTE: ProBusiness Services, Inc. and the ProBusiness logo are registered trademarks of ProBusiness Services, Inc. All other trademarks and registered trademarks mentioned herein remain the property of their respective owners.   MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT - Click Here                http://tbutton.prnewswire.com/prn/11690X06477140  SOURCE ProBusiness Services, Inc.   CONTACT:          Precious Stroud Chambers of ProBusiness Services, Inc.,                   925-737-7087, or pchambers@probusiness.com URL:              http://www.qualcomm.com                   http://www.probusiness.com http://www.prnewswire.com  Copyright (C) 2001 PR Newswire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          California INDUSTRY KEYWORD: FIN                   MLM                   CSE SUBJECT CODE:     CON     [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information  purposes only.  We are a financial news re-distributor.  We are  not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest  which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are  monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains an  advertisement describing a product, service or company for which we received a fee, at our normal advertising rates of $5750 for  a non-flash ad, $8,950 for a flash ad and $14,500 a flash ad with  preferential positioning (subject to volume and other discounts),  from the advertising company.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure  compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of  the press release issued by, or the research or other reports  regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the  advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained  from third party sources and were not written, generated or  edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give  any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures  regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or  Monitored Company are provided for your convenience.  We  assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently  verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT  AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT    http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp   FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER] **********************************************************      	   [IMAGE]    Erase a Year's Worth of Pain in the Next Six Months!  Get ready for The coming Nasdaq surge.  Get invested NOW in the 5 ChangeWave NewTech stars of the Nasdaq comeback.  Discover them all in this FREE special report: "Profiting NOW from the 2001-2002 Tech Comeback" Access your FREE copy right now


Sevil.

We are looking forward to having you here.
If you want, you can stop by one day and I shall introduce you
to Grant Masson with whom you will be working this summer.

Vince

Sevil Yaman <syaman@Bayou.UH.EDU> on 02/23/2000 10:09:30 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Thank You

Hi Dr. Kaminski,

Yesterday, I learned from Shannon Rogers at the associate-analyst program
that I was offered a summer associate/internship position in your group. I
am already very excited about this position and look forward to working in
your group. Many thanks for your consideration.

Sevil Yaman
Department of Economics
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77204-5882
(713) 743-3814 / 3817


Mark,

The pay equity issue sounds like the reviews we do every year to ensure that
people are being paid equitably.  Given that the company has until November
of next year to get in compliance and to report out on the compliance issue,
it should be no big deal -- unless there currently are pay inequities.  A
list of persons in each job, with salary and gender, could allow us to
determine whether an issue even exists.

Michelle

Mark Greenberg@ENRON
12/07/2000 09:08 PM
To: deehyc@lapros.qc.ca
cc: blundyp@bennettjones.ca, Jay Boudreaux/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gustavo
Junqueira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Lenfest/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: BENJ.40387

Christopher -

Based upon your memo and our due diligence effort to date, is there any
indication of (a) any steps Daishowa has taken to put the committee required
under the Pay Equity Act or (b) any increase in compensation that would be
consistent with the Pay Equity Act and therefore enable Daishowa to dispense
with the need for a committee?  Is there any way to currently assess what
potential liabilities could be or to view any industry data on this issue
that may indicate how extensive liability could be???

The main concern is that we are negotiating with Daishowa to be in a position
to undertake, as of closing, all responsibilities associated with all matters
disclosed, unless there is a legal noncompliance issue (e.g., failure to
maintain proper permits).  Since the requirements of the Pay Equity Act have
not been identified to management as a concern, I need to ensure that this is
a real issue (mostly from a $'s exposure standpoint) vs. something so remote
that it should not even be discussed.

Please let me know your thoughts.  Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000 08:56 PM -----

	Johanne Berthiaume <berthiaumej@lapros.qc.ca>
	12/07/2000 10:32 AM

		 To: "'blundyp@bennettjones.ca'" <blundyp@bennettjones.ca>
		 cc: "'mark.greenberg@enron.com'" <mark.greenberg@enron.com>
		 Subject: BENJ.40387

 <<d4s_03!.DOC>>
Memo re: Quebec Labour Issues

Regards

Christopher Deehy
e-mail: deehyc@lapros.qc.ca
tel:  (514) 925-6353

>  ___________________________________
>  Le pr,sent courrier ,lectronique (courriel) et les documents qui y
> sont  attach,s peuvent contenir de l'information confidentielle; ils
> s'adressent exclusivement au destinataire mentionn, ci-dessus et nulle
> autre personne ne doit en prendre connaissance ni les utiliser ou les
> divulguer.  Si vous recevez le pr,sent courriel par erreur, veuillez en
> aviser l',metteur imm,diatement par courrier ,lectronique et le d,truire
> avec les documents qui y sont attach,s.
>
>  The information contained in this e-mail and all attachments is
> confidential and is for the sole use of its intended recipient. It may not
> be disclosed to or used by anyone other than the addressee. If received in
> error, please contact the sender by return e-mail and delete this e-mail
> and all attachments from your system.
>
>
>
>
 - d4s_03!.DOC


Brad,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Koepke, Gwyn
Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 12:32 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	FW: Argentina FX and CPI curves, dated 6/20/01

Vince,

FYI.  We will provide updates to the Argentine situation in the GMM, on which RAC is copied each week.  Also, we wrote the attached report for our internal purposes along with the forecast below.

Gwyn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Koepke, Gwyn
Sent:	Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:45 PM
To:	Hudler, Cindy; Shahi, Pushkar; Stuart III, William; Mujica, Mitra; Raymond, Maureen
Subject:	Argentina FX and CPI curves, dated 6/20/01

Cindy,

Please find attached the Argentine peso and CPI forecast.

It should be noted that a vote is pending in the Argentine Congress (had been expected today) to adjust the convertibility law in Argentina to allow a basket of euros and U.S. dollars in equal weights (once parity is reached for euro-dollar) that would replace the existing one-for-one peso to US dollar currency board.  The economy ministry took a first step toward this new basket regime by introducing this week a dual-exchange rate system for the traded sector that allows Argentine exporters to benefit from the weaker euro by receiving export earnings in line with a mixed basket of 50% euros and 50% US dollars.  At today's spot rates, this implies an 8% depreciation of the peso vis-a-vis the basket.  An 8% devaluation at this juncture does not gain the kind of competitiveness needed by Argentine exporters to help boost economy when a major trading partner, Brazil, has depreciated 21% vis-a-vis the USD since the beginning of this year.  Initial reports indicate that consumer and corporate borrowers, however, would still pay debt service at the dollar peg exchange rate (one-for-one).

With such a change in currency regime as being contemplated in the Argentine Congress, investor confidence could wane if the plan is approved and as the implications of the new plan are interpreted by the market and as the sustainability of the existing currency board arrangement outside the export sector is analyzed.  A loss of investor confidence will put additional pressure on the peso, pressure which has not existed previous to this new announcement by economy chief Cavallo, especially now that the government's debt swap (exchanging short-term goverment paper for longer-term bonds) has been successfully executed.  As a consequence, although our forecast attached below assumes a one-for-one peso peg to the US dollar at this point to allow the quarterly revaluations to be completed in a timely fashion, this curve is subject to change upon knowledge of the Congressional vote and an analysis of the details announced with the vote as to the mechanics of this new basket regime for exporters and for the economy as a whole.

Gwyn Koepke and
Maureen Raymond-Castaneda


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 10/08/01.   Please note that Federal-Mogul Corp. was placed on "NO TRADES".
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923,  Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or Darren Vanek at x3-1436.


the best moment of your life


[IMAGE] Syncrasy, LLC?   713.228.8470 Off  713.228.4147 Fax   909 Texas Avenue  Suite 1314  Houston, TX 77002         www.syncrasy.com         Sales:  713.228.4407   Development Offices:  970.247.4139 Off  970.247.7951 Fax   835 Main Avenue  Suite 221  Durango, CO 81301      	  	    [IMAGE]Complimentary version of Trader Summary  from Syncrasy, LLC and APB Energy Inc.   [IMAGE]- If you would like to receive this product early in the morning     please call Syncrasy at [IMAGE]713 228 4407for more information       or send an email to subscribe_TraderSummary@syncrasy.com    [IMAGE]- If you would like to be added to this daily email list     please send an email to TraderSummaryemail@syncrasy.com    [IMAGE]- If you would like to be removed from this daily email     please reply to this email with the words "CANCEL" or send an email to cancel_tradersummary@syncrasy.com      Data last updated: Friday, Dec 28, 2001 at 08:28AM EST    [IMAGE]Congratulations Andy Weingarten, APB Energy!  Winner of the $50,000 Winter 2000-01 AQUILA/AMS Seasonal Forecasting Competition. For more information please visit: AMS or Aquila   [IMAGE]New! >> Printable [IMAGE]PDFTrader Summary (You must have Adobe Acrobat Reader to open or print a PDF)   Click here for a definition of 'Average-Daily Maximum Temperature'     Today: Friday, December 28, 2001   Syncrasy's Choice:  Delta Temp.  Volatility Matrix      (Click on image to enlarge)     ECAR(CTR) 32 +1 ERCOT(SP) 66 +1 FRCC(SE) 69 NC MAAC(NE) 40 +2 MAIN(CTR) 27 +1 MAPP(HP) 15 +1 NPCC(NE) 33 +2 SERC(SE) 55 +2 SPP(SP) 52 +5 WSCC(NW) 43 -1 WSCC(RK) 33 -1 WSCC(SW) 57 -1     Range Standard Deviation     Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 23 24 31 40 30 53 55 52 Max 30 30 35 43 37 59 65 58 Min 20 20 28 38 25 44 48 49 Range 10 10 7 5 12 15 17 9 StD-P 2.1 2.8 2.5 1.2 3.4 3.6 5.4 2.6 Count 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix   Tomorrow: Saturday, December 29, 2001   Syncrasy's Choice:  Delta Temp.  Volatility Matrix      (Click on image to enlarge)     ECAR(CTR) 23 +1 ERCOT(SP) 59 +1 FRCC(SE) 74 +1 MAAC(NE) 39 +2 MAIN(CTR) 18 +1 MAPP(HP) 11 +1 NPCC(NE) 31 +1 SERC(SE) 51 +1 SPP(SP) 34 NC WSCC(NW) 41 -3 WSCC(RK) 28 -2 WSCC(SW) 56 -1     Range Standard Deviation     Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 18 17 30 39 29 54 50 52 Max 24 24 34 43 36 60 63 58 Min 14 10 25 37 23 50 42 48 Range 10 14 9 6 13 10 21 10 StD-P 2.9 3.9 2.7 1.8 3.2 2.8 5.3 3.1 Count 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix    Day 3: Sunday, December 30, 2001   Syncrasy's Choice:  Delta Temp.  Volatility Matrix      (Click on image to enlarge)     ECAR(CTR) 23 +2 ERCOT(SP) 52 -2 FRCC(SE) 65 +2 MAAC(NE) 30 +1 MAIN(CTR) 22 +2 MAPP(HP) 14 +2 NPCC(NE) 28 +1 SERC(SE) 40 NC SPP(SP) 31 -4 WSCC(NW) 41 NC WSCC(RK) 28 -5 WSCC(SW) 57 -1     Range Standard Deviation     Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 17 15 25 39 29 44 46 53 Max 20 19 31 42 33 55 52 57 Min 12 9 19 36 25 37 41 49 Range 8 10 12 6 8 18 11 8 StD-P 2.2 2.9 3.1 1.7 2.5 4.1 2.4 2.6 Count 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix   Day 4: Monday, December 31, 2001   Syncrasy's Choice:  Delta Temp.  Volatility Matrix      (Click on image to enlarge)     ECAR(CTR) 26 +2 ERCOT(SP) 53 -3 FRCC(SE) 64 +4 MAAC(NE) 33 +2 MAIN(CTR) 21 +1 MAPP(HP) 11 +1 NPCC(NE) 27 +1 SERC(SE) 40 -3 SPP(SP) 33 -6 WSCC(NW) 39 -4 WSCC(RK) 26 -9 WSCC(SW) 57 -2     Range Standard Deviation     Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 16 15 25 38 27 43 44 53 Max 19 19 28 42 33 46 48 57 Min 12 11 18 34 22 39 41 50 Range 7 8 10 8 11 7 7 7 StD-P 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.4 2.9 2.2 2.1 2.4 Count 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix    Day 5: Tuesday, January  1, 2002   Syncrasy's Choice:  Delta Temp.  Volatility Matrix      (Click on image to enlarge)     ECAR(CTR) 26 +2 ERCOT(SP) 51 -6 FRCC(SE) 68 +5 MAAC(NE) 33 +2 MAIN(CTR) 19 -3 MAPP(HP) 7 -9 NPCC(NE) 28 +2 SERC(SE) 43 -1 SPP(SP) 30 -9 WSCC(NW) 39 -6 WSCC(RK) 22 -15 WSCC(SW) 55 -3     Range Standard Deviation     Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 17 13 24 38 23 44 42 52 Max 20 20 29 41 31 47 47 57 Min 11 5 17 34 16 40 38 47 Range 9 15 12 7 15 7 9 10 StD-P 2.4 4.9 2.7 2.2 4.7 1.9 3.2 2.8 Count 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix   Day 6: Wednesday, January  2, 2002  Click Here for Syncrasy's 6-10 summary information.  Syncrasy's Choice:  Delta Temp.  Volatility Matrix      (Click on image to enlarge)     ECAR(CTR) 26 -3 ERCOT(SP) 46 -14 FRCC(SE) 69 +6 MAAC(NE) 32 -2 MAIN(CTR) 19 -8 MAPP(HP) 12 -10 NPCC(NE) 29 +2 SERC(SE) 41 -5 SPP(SP) 27 -18 WSCC(NW) 42 -2 WSCC(RK) 28 -12 WSCC(SW) 56 -3     Range Standard Deviation     Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 16 18 25 41 25 43 37 52 Max 22 27 29 44 30 47 47 56 Min 11 9 18 38 16 37 30 48 Range 11 18 11 6 14 10 17 8 StD-P 3.3 5.9 3.0 1.6 5.3 2.7 5.5 2.5 Count 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix    Day 7: Thursday, January  3, 2002   Syncrasy's Choice:  Delta Temp.  Volatility Matrix      (Click on image to enlarge)     ECAR(CTR) 26 -6 ERCOT(SP) 50 -15 FRCC(SE) 65 NC MAAC(NE) 34 -2 MAIN(CTR) 22 -10 MAPP(HP) 15 -12 NPCC(NE) 30 NC SERC(SE) 43 -7 SPP(SP) 37 -13 WSCC(NW) 42 -1 WSCC(RK) 30 -10 WSCC(SW) 56 -3     Range Standard Deviation     Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 20 24 26 40 30 42 38 52 Max 29 34 30 42 34 47 47 56 Min 13 13 18 38 27 35 29 48 Range 16 21 12 4 7 12 18 8 StD-P 4.9 5.8 3.5 1.2 2.7 4.2 5.4 2.4 Count 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix   Day 8: Friday, January  4, 2002   Syncrasy's Choice:  Delta Temp.  Volatility Matrix      (Click on image to enlarge)     ECAR(CTR) 8 -24 ERCOT(SP) 35 -25 FRCC(SE) 54 -6 MAAC(NE) 19 -10 MAIN(CTR) 1 -36 MAPP(HP) -1 -34 NPCC(NE) 19 -5 SERC(SE) 30 -17 SPP(SP) 14 -34 WSCC(NW) 37 -4 WSCC(RK) 22 -3 WSCC(SW) 46 -6     Range Standard Deviation     Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 20 25 27 39 29 43 43 51 Max 30 33 34 42 36 48 50 56 Min 3 10 18 35 21 35 31 45 Range 27 23 16 7 15 13 19 11 StD-P 8.1 7.2 5.2 2.1 4.6 5.2 5.9 3.5 Count 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix    Day 9: Saturday, January  5, 2002   Syncrasy's Choice:  Delta Temp.  Volatility Matrix      (Click on image to enlarge)     ECAR(CTR) 8 -29 ERCOT(SP) 24 -25 FRCC(SE) 50 -19 MAAC(NE) 11 -29 MAIN(CTR) 12 -20 MAPP(HP) 22 -10 NPCC(NE) 7 -27 SERC(SE) 22 -32 SPP(SP) 15 -23 WSCC(NW) 36 -6 WSCC(RK) 20 -14 WSCC(SW) 45 -8     Range Standard Deviation     Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 23 28 24 39 27 44 43 51 Max 32 34 35 42 36 53 54 56 Min 13 21 8 35 18 28 21 45 Range 19 13 27 7 18 25 33 11 StD-P 6.2 3.6 9.8 2.4 6.1 8.1 10.9 4.1 Count 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix   Day 10: Sunday, January  6, 2002   Syncrasy's Choice:  Delta Temp.  Volatility Matrix      (Click on image to enlarge)     ECAR(CTR) 20 -15 ERCOT(SP) 34 -17 FRCC(SE) 55 -10 MAAC(NE) 19 -26 MAIN(CTR) 26 -9 MAPP(HP) 32 -3 NPCC(NE) 13 -28 SERC(SE) 31 -20 SPP(SP) 30 -18 WSCC(NW) 39 -4 WSCC(RK) 29 -6 WSCC(SW) 48 -9     Range Standard Deviation     Reg CT HP NE NW RK SE SP SW Mean 24 29 22 37 22 41 36 43 Max 28 34 30 39 27 50 41 48 Min 16 20 15 33 16 36 32 37 Range 12 14 15 6 11 14 9 11 StD-P 2.8 4.4 5.7 1.7 3.1 4.6 3.8 4.5 Count 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Click Here to See Each Weather Forecast Used Within the Volatility Matrix     Trader Summary is designed around and formatted for the  Plasma displays, RainbowWall? and DataWall?   Trader Summary can also be viewed from www.syncrasy.com or     www.apbenergy.com or  www.truequote.com


When: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:00 AM to Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: Raveno ? (get directions)

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Darren Farmer, George Smith, Charlie Muzzy


After the Day ahead market ran, the PDCI (TNOB) branch group TTC in the
(N-S) direction was changed from 2572 MW to 2544 MW for HE's 0100 through
1200 for operating day 8/1/01.  The reason for the change is for work on the
Valve Group 6 at Sylmar.  The first applicable Hour Ahead market to run with
these values is HE 0600.  The ISO will update you of any changes in line
rating status.  Sent by Market Operations, inquiries please call the Hour
Ahead Desk.

The system conditions described in this communication are dynamic and
subject to change.  While the ISO has attempted to reflect the most current,
accurate information available in preparing this notice, system conditions
may change suddenly with little or no notice.


I need to place a $0 bid for Steve Christie and a $0 bid for Wade Richey.

Thanks


Vince-

Understood.

I am going to request two days of vacation, for Monday and Tuesday.

Clayton


Register now for the PMA OnLine Power Report! This is a free news service.

California Regulators Claim Structural Separation Action Caused Electrical Distribution Debacle-Same Problems Will Happen in Florida If Bellsouth Is Broken Up Into Wholesale & Retail Companies Business Wire ( July 31, 2001 )
TALLAHASSEE, Fla., Jul 31, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- A former member of the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and his former chief of staff testified today that the electric energy crisis plaguing their state can be directly traced back to structural separation actions the Commission took years earlier. During day two of a Florida Public Service Commission (PSC) structural separation workshop they warned that granting the AT&T request to break up BellSouth into wholesale and retail companies would be leading Florida consumers down that same path. G. Mitchell Wilk and Carl Danner told the PSC today that the California Commission's concerns about possible utility generation market power led it to force utilities to sell off fossil fuel generating plants. This action ultimately resulted in rolling black outs and forced utilities and ultimately the State to buy that power back at higher prices. "Florida can learn through California's mistakes. A breakup will intensify a contradiction between cost-based wholesale prices and subsidized retail rates. Since retail processes must follow wholesale costs, a breakup will accelerate an end to forced subsidies," said former PUC Commissioner Wilk. "The costs of the breakup are large and will affect all customers. By contrast, the alleged benefits are entirely speculative, and have been forcefully disputed." Danner also told Florida Commissioners that a breakup would be costly and difficult to reverse. "The public wants convenience and simplicity, but will get more confusion, complexity and cost," said Danner. "Competitors will see this as one more means to use the regulatory process against one another by trying to plunge the PSC into micro-management. All this new industry cost will be paid for by consumers and will subtract from Florida's economy." Wilk added that a true debacle in what is now an efficient and evolving telecommunications network might occur through structural separation actions. "California failed by seeking to deregulate electricity generation, while using a highly-regulatory approach to do so," said Wilk. "The breakup proposal here in Florida would attempt the same by adopting highly intrusive regulation, at a time when there is robust competition in the state. It would be economically counterproductive for the consumers and impede on the evolution of technology in Florida." CONTACT: BellSouth


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/11/2001
05:18 PM ---------------------------
From: Christina Grow/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/11/2001 03:11 PM

To: Stanley Horton/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

cc: Cindy Stark/ENRON@enronXgate, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Final Colorado Springs, CO Itinerary

SK - I printed these out & put them in the meeting folder.  And sent a copy
to Melissa.  mm

Attached is the final copy of the Colorado Springs, CO itinerary and a copy
of the most current INGAA agenda.  Please call  if you have any questions.

Have a safe and fun trip.

Christina Grow
Enron Corp.
Investor Relations
713.853.6021
Christina.Grow@enron.com


Sharron Westbrook (Rick Causey's Assistant) - X37094
Stephanie J. Harris (Jim Derrick's Assistant) - X35351
Maureen McVicker (Steve Kean's Assistant) - X31808
Bridget Maronge (Andy Fastow's Assistant) - X33585
Gloria Alvarez (George Wasaff's Assistant) - X68364
Kayla Heitmeyer (Derryl Cleaveland's Assistant) - X67697


the defense couldn't even stop them.  they have no place to go but up.  i am
concerned about the d.  you need that to win in the playoffs.


-----Original Message-----
From:  Diamond, Daniel
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 5:49 PM
To: Greenberg, Mark; Jones, Tana
Cc: Shults, Bob
Subject: RE: TFS - Fee Agreement

Mark/Tana,
Thank you, these changes should work out just fine.  Please copy me on the
revised LOI.  I discussed the online BETA with Bob and we agree that it
should remain an offline document.

Thanks again,

Dan
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Greenberg, Mark
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Diamond, Daniel
Cc: Shults, Bob; Jones, Tana
Subject: TFS - Fee Agreement

Dan -

Attached are a marked and clean version of the Fee Agreement for TFS.  I have
modified the agreement to reflect that a hard copy of the BETA will be signed
and to clean up those areas discussing the online BETA.  If these changes are
acceptable, please let either me or Tana know as similar changes need to be
made to the LOI to ensure consistency.

Further, if you and Bob want to keep the Fee Agreement silent as to online
BETA's and have agreed that all BETA's will be offline documents, them I will
make the appropriate revisions to the form Fee Agreement and BETA to
accommodate this change.

Please let me know if there is anything further that you should need.

 << File: baf - TFS (5-07-01).doc >>    << File: baf - TFS (clean5-07-01).doc
>>

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Attached are the minutes from the February 6 Corporate Responsibility Task
Force meeting.   Also attached is a chart outlining in more detail the
metrics for success for each subcommittee.  The second document is the result
of a meeting among subcommittee chairs and other interested task force
members to help flesh out their purpose as a step toward developing a
measurable work plan.

Let me know if you have questions or comments.  If you have not been
contacted already, you will be hearing from your subcommittee chairs shortly
regarding your next subcommittee meeting.  We also plan to set the date of
the next overall task force meeting within the next couple of weeks.


Start Date: 4/19/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041907.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/19/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Every cheerful little deal has a sticky point.  On the PacifiCorp-EEI
journey, we have finally stumbled onto ours.  They like Option A for closeout
setoff, which limits everything to just the parties,  no affiliates and no
other agreements.  We like Option  B which brings in the whole universe.
They justify their position in a very confident manner by just assuming that
any attorney worth his salt would just automatically know that as a REGULATED
UTILITY they just can't go to Option B.  Then, they turn to me and say:
"Christian, we thought you would know this.  How do you justify your position
with PGE?"  At which point I act like it is no problem at all, but do not
offer a reason.  We are going to have to get into the reasons with these
guys.  Is there any regulated utility reason why we cannot use the broader
setoff approach?  Please help me think about this and Steve, prehaps someone
at your former firm could guide us here. ----cgy


I need to hold the New Power invoice until Monday.  It should be ready to
send out Monday afternoon and everything should be captured in Sitara.


-----Original Message-----
From: Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:58 AM
To: Donoho, Lindy
Subject: FW: Osama Movie

-----Original Message-----
From: Lohman, TK
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:59 PM
To: Lindberg, Lorraine; Armstrong, Julie; McConnell, Mark
Subject: FW: Osama Movie

-----Original Message-----
From: Lohman, TK
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:13 AM
To: 'swalker@sidrichgas.com'
Subject: FW: Osama Movie

Buehler's sick humor!  I've missed you.  Linda Ward called me and I had to let her know that Brad is my new "Main Man"!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TK
-----Original Message-----
From: Buehler, Craig
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Dietz, Rick; Bodnar, Michael; Jones, Dana; Lohman, TK
Subject: Osama Movie

This is funny! Don't have your sound up too loud.

Click on the link below, then click "Watch this movie", then click "PLAY" after it loads.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view.php?id=33641


Louise,

I have just sent you the revised Inception Document including three additional items: Single deal entry revisions, Options reports, and Transport valuation in ERMS. After discussing with Geof, we decided not to include the EOL reporting tools this time. Hopefully, you are OK with that. Please let us know if the EOL reporting tools have to be discussed in the document.

Regards.

Zhiyong

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, April 17, 2001 1:50 PM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong; Storey, Geoff
Cc:	Bibi, Philippe A.; Perlman, Beth; Stock, Stephen
Subject:	Re: GTV weekly status update

I'm a bit confused - I think that the current document distributed for circulation is too small.  I would suggest this be abandonned and a next draft produced which includes the following.

Single Deal entry revisions
Options reports
Transport Valuation in ERMS
EOL reporting tools (possible)

I would like to see Phase II include the items above and an Inception document re-issued this week.

Thanks

Louise

From:	Zhiyong Wei/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/16/2001 06:30 PM
To:	Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate, Beth Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	GTV weekly status update

Please find below the GTV project status update for this week. Please see the attached file for the project timeline update in Microsoft Project.

GTV status meeting attendees:  Zhiyong Wei, Karima Husain, Francis Lim, Jeremy Wong, Bill Fortney, Nayan Dattani, Dave Nommensen, Russ Severson, Narasim Kasaru, Mike Swaim, George Grant, Chuck Ames, Geof Storey.

Accomplishments:
?	Incorporating physical deal positions in TDS:
o	Changes to CPR reader process and its unit testing have been completed.
o	Changes for the view aggregation and its unit testing have been completed.
o	A new task has been added due to the requirement of loading prior-day curves into Position Manager (Please see the attached project timeline.)
o	Changes for Position Manager are in progress (Please see the attached project timeline.)
?	Single point of deal entry for term deals:
o	Single point of deal entry is now ready for user acceptance testing.
?	Gas Daily deals:
o	Changes to ERMS PortCalc application for the Gas Daily deals are complete and ready for testing.
o	Changes to TDS deal valuation are in progress and on schedule (please see the attached project timeline.)
o	A new task has been added to flag fixed-price positions (please see the attached project timeline.)
?	Live feeds for Gas Daily/intra-month curves:
o	Released to production

Plans for the week ending 4/20/01:
?	Continue IT development of Phase I items.
?	Obtain sign-off for GTV-II, Phase 2 issues and timeline.
?	Commence IT development of Phase 2 issues.

Issues:
Incompatibility of TIBCO version 5.x and 6.x. The single point of deal entry is done using TIBCO 6.x. Some users are still using TIBCO 5.x. Upgrading to either TIBCO 6.x or Windows 2000 is needed.

 << File: GTV2 4-16-01.mpp >>
Thanks

Zhiyong


==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================
 - sager.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/16/2001 03:41 PM
---------------------------

Ryan Langan <ryan.langan@ripcity.com> on 02/16/2001 02:16:19 PM
To: "'kate.symes@enron.com'" <kate.symes@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Blazer Ticket Specials - March

Hi Kate,

I have been recieving quite a few calls from your employees.  I hope they
have been enjoying these emails.  Here are the games in March I am able to
offer a special rate to your employees.  Thanks again for passing the
information on.  I hope all is well!

> Here are the upcoming Blazer specials for all Enron employees!
>
>
> Blue Section (lower level endzone)  - $47 (normally $69 - available for
> limited  games)
>
> Purple section (upper level center) - $20  (Normally $23)
>
> Tan section (upper level behind basket) - $10
>
>
>  *BONUS* - each ticket comes with worth of $3 Blazer Bucks (good for food
> and
>  beverage in the arena)
>
> ** Preferred seating is still available for games sold out in the general
> seating **
>
>  To see a map with the colored sections go to http://www.blazers.com and
>  click on arena and tickets...
>
>  Upcoming games:
>
> March 1 - L.A. Clippers
> March 3 - Golden State Warriors
> March 6 - Vancouver Grizzlies (Clyde Drexlers Jersey Retirement)
> March 8 - San Antonio Spurs
> March 14 - Phoenix Suns
> March 16 - Utah Jazz
> March 26 - L.A. Clippers
> March 28 - Dallas Mavericks
> March 30 - New York Knicks
>
>  OR - Call for any future Blazer game!!
>
>  For tickets please call Ryan Langan @ 503-797-9936 or e-mail:
> ryan.langan@ripcity.com
>
> Call ASAP if you would like GREAT seats for tomorrows game against the
> Celtics!
>


attached


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/09/2001 05:31 PM -----

	Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/09/2001 05:22 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy
Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-09-01

Please see attached

Regards,
Tom Moran
3-3017


Yes we won, but no we shouldn't change our response. The Judge sent us a
letter with his rulings, but has not signed an official order. In fact ,last
week the judge heard the Plaintiff's motion to reconsider and stated that his
letter was not an order. In light of this, I would leave the description the
same. Your thoughts?

	Rex Rogers@ENRON
	11/03/2000 05:35 PM

		 To: Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Litigation and Other Contingencies Disclosure

Richard:  I'm sure I must be wrong about this, but it was my understanding
(second-hand hearsay, at best) that the trial court ruled in our favor
against class certification after remand from the Supreme Court.  If I am
indeed incorrect, sorry for wasting your time with this message--just
disregard.  Thanks, Rex.

	Gary Peng
	11/03/2000 05:17 PM

		 To: Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Litigation and Other Contingencies Disclosure

---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron on 11/03/2000
05:17 PM ---------------------------
From: Richard B Sanders@ECT on 10/23/2000 06:52 AM
To: Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: Charles Cheek/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jan
Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert
Eickenroht/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Litigation and Other Contingencies Disclosure

I have no changes to the Intratex case description.

	Gary Peng@ENRON
	10/19/2000 06:13 PM

		 To: Charles Cheek/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Eickenroht/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Litigation and Other Contingencies Disclosure

Find below the Litigation and Other Contingencies footnote from the the June
30, 2000 Form 10-Q.  Please update the section of the disclosure for which
you are responsible for inclusion in the third quarter 2000 Form 10Q .  Also,
please let me know if there are any new items that should be considered.

Please respond no later than Monday October 30.

Gary
3-6841

3.  Litigation and Other Contingencies

 Enron is a party to various claims and litigation, the significant items of
which are discussed below.  Although no assurances can be given, Enron
believes, based on its experience to date and after considering appropriate
reserves that have been established, that the ultimate resolution of such
items, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse
impact on Enron,s financial position or its results of operations.

 Litigation.  In 1995, several parties (the Plaintiffs) filed suit in Harris
County District Court in Houston, Texas, against Intratex Gas Company
(Intratex), Houston Pipe Line Company and Panhandle Gas Company
(collectively, the Enron Defendants), each of which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Enron.  The Plaintiffs were either sellers or royalty owners
under numerous gas purchase contracts with Intratex, many of which have
terminated.  Early in 1996, the case was severed by the Court into two
matters to be tried (or otherwise resolved) separately.  In the first matter,
the Plaintiffs alleged that the Enron Defendants committed fraud and
negligent misrepresentation in connection with the &Panhandle program,8 a
special marketing program established in the early 1980s.  This case was
tried in October 1996 and resulted in a verdict for the Enron Defendants.  In
the second matter, the Plaintiffs allege that the Enron Defendants violated
state regulatory requirements and certain gas purchase contracts by failing
to take the Plaintiffs, gas ratably with other producers, gas at certain
times between 1978 and 1988.  The trial court certified a class action with
respect to ratability claims.  On March 9, 2000, the Texas Supreme Court
ruled that the trial court,s class certification was improper and remanded
the case to the trial court.  The Enron Defendants deny the Plaintiffs,
claims and have asserted various affirmative defenses, including the statute
of limitations.  The Enron Defendants believe that they have strong legal and
factual defenses, and intend to vigorously contest the claims.  Although no
assurances can be given, Enron believes that the ultimate resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or
results of operations.

 On November 21, 1996, an explosion occurred in or around the Humberto Vidal
Building in San Juan, Puerto Rico.  The explosion resulted in fatalities,
bodily injuries and damage to the building and surrounding property.  San
Juan Gas Company, Inc. (San Juan Gas), an Enron affiliate, operated a
propane/air distribution system in the vicinity, but did not provide service
to the building. Enron, San Juan Gas, four affiliates and their insurance
carriers were named as defendants, along with several third parties,
including The Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, Puerto Rico Telephone
Company, Heath Consultants Incorporated, Humberto Vidal, Inc. and their
insurance carriers, in numerous lawsuits filed in U.S. District Court for the
District of Puerto Rico and the Superior Court of Puerto Rico.  These suits
seek damages for wrongful death, personal injury, business interruption and
property damage allegedly caused by the explosion.  After nearly four years
without determining the cause of the explosion, all parties have agreed not
to litigate further that issue, but to move these suits toward settlements or
trials to determine whether each plaintiff was injured as a result of the
explosion and, if so, the lawful damages attributable to such injury. The
defendants have agreed on a fund for settlements or final awards. Numerous
suits have been settled and 20 cases have been set for trial in the federal
court beginning in February 2001. Although no assurances can be given, Enron
believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

 Trojan Investment Recovery.  In early 1993, Portland General Electric
Company (PGE) ceased commercial operation of the Trojan nuclear power
generating facility (Trojan).  In April 1996 a circuit court judge in Marion
County, Oregon, found that the Oregon Public Utility Commission (OPUC) could
not authorize PGE to collect a return on its undepreciated investment in
Trojan, contradicting a November 1994 ruling from the same court.  The ruling
was the result of an appeal of PGE,s March 1995 general rate order which
granted PGE recovery of, and a return on, 87% of its remaining investment in
Trojan.  The 1994 ruling was appealed to the Oregon Court of Appeals and was
stayed pending the appeal of the OPUC,s March 1995 order.  Both PGE and the
OPUC separately appealed the April 1996 ruling, which appeals were combined
with the appeal of the November 1994 ruling at the Oregon Court of Appeals.
On June 24, 1998, the Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon ruled that the
OPUC does not have the authority to allow PGE to recover a rate of return on
its undepreciated investment in Trojan.  The court upheld the OPUC,s
authorization of PGE,s recovery of its undepreciated investment in Trojan.

 PGE and the OPUC each filed petitions for review with the Oregon Supreme
Court.  On August 26, 1998, the Utility Reform Project filed a petition for
review with the Oregon Supreme Court seeking review of that portion of the
Oregon Court of Appeals decision relating to PGE,s recovery of its
undepreciated investment in Trojan.  On April 29, 1999, the Oregon Supreme
Court accepted the petitions for review.  On June 16, 1999, Oregon House Bill
3220 authorizing the OPUC to allow recovery of a return on the undepreciated
investment in property retired from service was signed.  One of the effects
of the bill is to affirm retroactively the OPUC,s authority to allow PGE,s
recovery of a return on its undepreciated investment in Trojan.

 Relying on the new legislation, on July 2, 1999, PGE requested the Oregon
Supreme Court to vacate the June 24, 1998, adverse ruling of the Oregon Court
of Appeals, affirm the validity of the OPUC,s order allowing PGE to recover a
return on its undepreciated investment in Trojan and to reverse its decision
accepting the Utility Reform Project,s petition for review.  The Utility
Reform Project and the Citizens Utility Board, another party to the
proceeding, opposed such request and submitted to the Oregon Secretary of
State sufficient signatures in support of placing a referendum to negate the
new legislation on the November 2000 ballot.  The Oregon Supreme Court has
indicated it will defer hearing the matter until after the November 2000
elections.  Enron cannot predict the outcome of these actions.  Additionally,
due to uncertainties in the regulatory process, management cannot predict,
with certainty, what ultimate rate-making action the OPUC will take regarding
PGE,s recovery of a rate of return on its Trojan investment.  Although no
assurances can be given, Enron believes that the ultimate resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or
results of operations.

 Environmental Matters.  Enron is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations.  These laws and regulations require
expenditures in connection with the construction of new facilities, the
operation of existing facilities and for remediation at various operating
sites.  The implementation of the Clean Air Act Amendments is expected to
result in increased operating expenses.  These increased operating expenses
are not expected to have a material impact on Enron,s financial position or
results of operations.

 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has informed Enron that it is a
potentially responsible party at the Decorah Former Manufactured Gas Plant
Site (the Decorah Site) in Decorah, Iowa, pursuant to the provisions of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA,
also commonly known as Superfund).  The manufactured gas plant in Decorah
ceased operations in 1951.  A predecessor company of Enron purchased the
Decorah Site in 1963.  Enron,s predecessor did not operate the gas plant and
sold the Decorah Site in 1965.  The EPA alleges that hazardous substances
were released to the environment during the period in which Enron,s
predecessor owned the site, and that Enron,s predecessor assumed the
liabilities of the company that operated the plant.  Enron contests these
allegations.  To date, the EPA has identified no other potentially
responsible parties with respect to this site.  Under the terms of
administrative orders, Enron replaced affected topsoil and removed impacted
subsurface soils in certain areas of the tract where the plant was formerly
located.  Enron completed the final removal actions at the site in November
1998 and concluded all remaining site activities in the spring of 1999.
Enron submitted a final report on the work conducted at the site to the EPA.
Enron does not expect to incur any additional expenditures in connection with
this site.

 Enron,s natural gas pipeline companies conduct soil and groundwater
remediation on a number of their facilities.  Enron does not expect to incur
material expenditures in connection with soil and groundwater remediation.


Please put on my calendar and call to confirm my attendance.  thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 02/20/2000 05:29
PM ---------------------------

"Gilbert R. Whitaker, Jr." <grwhit@rice.edu> on 02/18/2000 01:48:45 PM
To: skean@enron.com
cc: hauged@rice.edu
Subject:

Steve -

I enjoyed our meeting last Monday and we are hard at work on a different
proposal designed to speed up or progress to the top ranks of the world's
best business schools. As you pointed out this is in our mutual interest as
well as the interests of much of the Houston business community.

I mentioned in our meeting the possibility of your joining the Council of
Overseers of the Jones School. This group consists of about 36 business
leaders, mostly from Houston but also includes individuals from as far away
as Saudi Arabia.

We meet about two times a year for an afternoon to discuss important policy
issues facing the Business School. I have found the advice and counsel
offered by the group to be extraordinarily helpful as we work on improving
the Jones School. The group is chaired by Dennis Hendrix, former CEO of
PanEnergy. I will fax you a list of the members and the charter of the group.

It so happens that we will be meeting next Wednesday afternoon from three
to five PM at Cohen House, the faculty club at Rice University and you
would be welcome to attend either as a new member or as a guest.
Interestingly, a presentation will be given by a group of faculty who have
interests in the area of e-commerce.

I will have my assistant fax this material to you shortly. Should you wish
to discuss this, I will be here all afternoon today as well as all of next
week.

gil


I will arrive late tomorrow due to doctor appointment.  Should be here
between 10:30 / 11:00.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Joanne Rozycki
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3880D
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-5968     Fax:      (713) 646-3490
Email:   joanne.rozycki@enron.com


Thanks, man, I appreciate the kind words and thoughts.  My parents arrive this
evening for a week or mirth (or is that myrrh) and merrymaking on the big
city.
How are thing sin the heartland?  Cold enough yet?  has Nebraska bought a
national title yet, or is Florida State paying their players more?  Give my
love
to the girls.  David

Drew.Fossum@enron.com on 11/19/2000 08:22:05 PM

To:   David N Schumeister/NY/NA/ShS@ShSDOMAIN
cc:

Subject:  Re: Save the date!

Outstanding!!!  Consider the date saved!  I'm really happy for both of you
and eagerly await meeting Joy.  I'll give you a buzz for the details!
Congratulations!  Drew and Sandra

"David N Schumeister" <dschumeister@shearman.com> on 11/16/2000 10:43:41 AM

To:   Drew.Fossum@enron.com
cc:   jnewman148@aol.com

Subject:  Save the date!

Drew:
     How is life?  Things here are going very well; just extremely hectic
(which, I guess, comes as no surprise).  I am giving you plenty of advance
notice; we are getting married on Sunday, September 2, the Sunday of Labor
Day
weekend in New York. We have scheduled this in part to accomodate our dear
friends from out of town such that they do not have to take the Monday off
work.
Details to follow, but no excuses!  it has been far too long since I saw
you,
and cannot imagine a happier occasion.  I will check in over the next few
days
to hear how life is for you, and hope and trust it is all well.  Talk to
you
soon, David & Joy

Drew.Fossum@enron.com on 10/19/2000 09:15:04 AM

To:   David N Schumeister/NY/NA/ShS@ShSDOMAIN
cc:

Subject:  Re: guess what!?!

Outstanding!  You have our most sincere congratulations and best
wishes--first for a great trip and more importantly for a great life
together!  I need to find a CLE boondoggle in the city that I can bring
Sandra to and we'll get together and celebrate.  I'd suggest you look for a
CLE boondoggle out here, but given your practice specialty, it might be
difficult to convince your partners they need to pay for a "hog law" or
"corn law" seminar!!!  Adios amigo.  DF

"David N Schumeister" <dschumeister@shearman.com> on 10/19/2000 02:37:51 AM

To:   Drew.Fossum@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  guess what!?!

Joy and I got engaged this past weekend; I am loving life and it is great.
We
leave for Italy tomorrow for ten days; I will call when we get back and
fill you
in on all the details.  Ciao, David


missing deal for matt

buy idaho
march
25 mw
210
palo verde

thanks!


Please see insurance groups' request re: equipment warranties.  One
alternative is to send equipment contracts to David Marshall for  his review.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/14/2001 09:00
AM ---------------------------

Paul E Parrish
03/14/2001 07:38 AM
To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, johng@nepco.com @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila
Tweed@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Jake
Thomas@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nigel
Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sami Arap/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Evans@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul E
Parrish/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
davidlu@nepco.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jon Chapman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard
Leibert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James L
Bouillion@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: WARRANTIES & INSURANCE
LATEST MARKET DEVELOPMENT

John:
I worked on someone else's project recently and have requested the cost to
include suppliers on the coverage so I will be interested to see if it is
available and, if it is, the cost.
Paul

John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/14/2001 07:03 AM
To: Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, johng@nepco.com @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila
Tweed@ECT, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Jake Thomas@ECT, Kay Mann@ENRON,
Nigel Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen P
Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sami Arap/SA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Evans@ECT, John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul E
Parrish/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, davidlu@nepco.com, Mark
Evans@ECT, Jon Chapman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Richard Leibert/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James L
Bouillion@ECT, Rob Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject:  WARRANTIES & INSURANCE
LATEST MARKET DEVELOPMENT

JWVS

Paul, thanks for putting the word out on this, since excluding collateral
damage from warranty problems from BI will surely impact the risk profile of
any project if the vendors will not step up to the collateral damage in their
vendor contracts.

Jim and Paul, do you know if the underwriters will offer coverage to the
vendors or turnkey contractors for this issue under their respective
contracts? GE (who are likely to want to continue to self-insure) can be
expected to put up a real struggle before choking liability for collateral
damage down, as  they will likely see it as a material risk issue. I think it
ought to be added to the form contract discussions with GE as a test case.

I think this is an important enough change in the market that we need to
develop a common approach or at  least a common understanding accross Enron
and NEPCO on the issues.

I will be back in the office next week and chase it up with you guys then.

	Nigel Carling
	03/13/2001 09:19 AM

		 To: Stephen P Stein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Reynolds/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Reistetter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: WARRANTIES & INSURANCE
LATEST MARKET DEVELOPMENT

FYI
----- Forwarded by Nigel Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/13/2001 09:16 AM
-----

	Paul E Parrish@ENRON
	03/13/2001 08:02 AM

		 To: Nigel Carling/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Spencer
Burton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Cullen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
McGarry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bob
Meckna/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James
Naeger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Donald
Reid/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael Guerriero/SA/Enron@Enron,
Kevin Ruffcorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rafi
Khan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Quek/SIN/ECT@ECT, Manuel
Gallego/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron,
Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, David Lund, Dag Adolfsson/HOU/EES@EES, Curly
Baca/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kenneth Bean/HOU/EES@EES, Karl
Breckon/NA/Enron@Enron, John Cates/HOU/EES@EES, Ed Cattigan/EU/Enron@ENRON,
Ned E Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Curran/CA/Enron@Enron,
Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Roberto
Figueroa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David
Glessner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Howe/Corp/Enron, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christopher B Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Oehrle/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry Reynolds/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rob Walls/NA/Enron, David K Bargainer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl
Costa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed
Dannhaus/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Phillip
Foster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Gavin
Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steve
Heck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward J Hlopak
Sr/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward Hlopak Jr/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ed
Husami/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Lundin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON,
Michael Ranz/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott
Laidlaw/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Lakes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martin Penkwitz/HOU/EES@EES, Jim
Sutherland, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron@ENRON, Roger
Tietz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Richard Vincent/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry
Yamada/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James L Bouillion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Clayton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: WARRANTIES & INSURANCE
LATEST MARKET DEVELOPMENT

To Distribution:

Recently, the insurance market has become much more restrictive with its
terms and conditions and is looking for substantial rate increases,
especially on property, machinery breakdown and business interruption
coverages.  For example, because of market conditions and adverse loss
experience, Enron,s deductible for certain asset classes will be increased
from $500,000 to $5,000,000 combined per incident of property damage and
business interruption along with a  (quantify percentage) premium increase.
In the context of construction risks and the associated operation of new
facilities, one of the major areas of underwriters, concerns are the nature
and scope warranties offered by the OEM.

Underwriters are requiring their insureds [Enron] to secure warranties from
major equipment suppliers, especially where technology risks are involved.
With the increase in insurance pricing and deductibles across the board,
underwriters are particularly sensitive to  certain types of technology, and
capacity will be severely limited or unavailable at any price if no
warranties are provided.

To ensure that superior, cost-effective insurance programs can be obtained
for our projects, it is imperative that Enron projects secure manufacturers,
warranties in the contracts negotiated with equipment suppliers and vendors..
Underwriters will require genuine guarantees, not just &token gestures8. They
will require rights of subrogation against the OEM, which means that we
cannot agree to a waiver of subrogation for the benefit of  the
manufacturers. It is the underwriter,s position that the manufacturer is to
take the risk for their design failure, faulty metallurgy, workmanship, and
unsuccessful &new8 techniques and the underwriter will provide insurance for
pure fortuitous loss or damage.

If you find that someone is not listed in the distribution list, please pass
this email to them. If you have any questions please call or email one of us
listed below:

Richard Vincent
David Marshall
Terry Yamada
Paul Parrish
Jim Bouillion
Paul Clayton


Ludmila,

Skontaktowalem sie z autorem ksiazki i obiecal mi wyslac  ja
na moj adres.

Wicek

Ludkam@aol.com on 01/30/2001 01:31:45 AM
To: vkamins@ect.enron.com, VKaminski@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Ksiazka do zamowienia w Polsce

Wicku, rozmawialam z Jadzia, pytala sie, czy pamietales wyslac e-mail do
Marysi na temat ksiazki, ktora chcesz zeby kupila dla ciebie. Martwi sie, ze
myslisz, ze nie chce tego zrobic, ?Marysia sparawdza e-mail codziennie i nic
od ciebie nie ma. Trzymaj sie, chodz spac wczesniej etc. L.


Just a reminder that I will be out of the office on Wednesday 11/21/01.  If you need assistance, Becky can help you and she can reach me if needed.

Ina


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001 04:00 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	01/25/2001 03:28 PM

		 To: thomas.padrone@gfinet.com
		 cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: GFI/EnronOnline Documents

At the request of Bob Shults, I am attaching our proposed form of Letter of
Interest.  In addition, although we feel our current discussions are covered
by the Non-Disclosure Agreement between our affiliate Enron Europe Limited
and GFI Group, Inc., we would like to enter into a Non-Disclosure Agreement
directly between GFI and EnronOnline and Enron Net Works due to the ongoing
nature of our discussions.  If the enclosed meets with your approval, please
sign the enclosed documents and return them to me via fax (713) 646-3490.  I
will have them executed by Enron.  If you have any comments or questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jinsung Myung/Corp/Enron on 03/02/2000
06:08 PM ---------------------------

Brad Morse@ECT
03/02/2000 05:25 PM
To: Jinsung Myung/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: File


Dave/Bob -

I've attached a marked up version of your FAQ's.  I suggest we use this as a starting point for initial customer contact as soon as the buyer is known.  One of the power marketers will make the initial contact, but I suggest that you have one of the EOL marketers in on the conversation.

The attachment is meant as talking points for the marketer to use during the initial conversation.  I understand that you are scheduling a meeting tomorrow to discuss the EOL timeline/process.  I suggest we try to come up with answers to each these questions during that meeting.

Mitch


Pat:

Recently, I talked with you about ordering another filing unit.  It turns out
that we need 2 more filing units.  Please order them the same size as the
floor to ceiling cabinet we have.  Have the inside of the cabinets configured
as follows:

1 Cabinet should have 5 shelves
1 Cabinet should have 6 shelves

When Interstore was here today reconfiguing 2 of our existing cabinets, they
removed 8 shelves that they are going to use on these new units.

Please price these 2 new units and charge them to Co. # 0413, RC # 107043.
Please let me the prices and approximate delivery date.  Also, let me  know
if you need anything else.  Thanks.  Anita