Jay,

To reconfirm my conversation yesterday with Reid Grossman, a consultant hired
by the referenced counterparty to negotiate their trading documents with us:

1.  PUD #1 would also like to get gas and power trading agreements in place
with us.  Per my conversation with Dave Fuller yesterday, the physical
trading agreements are of a higher priority than the financial trading
agreement.
2.  They would like to get a draft of a collateral annex from us.  Their
suggested trading threshold for themselves was in the $3.5-5mm range.
3.  They would already be in default of the MAC's you sent me in the credit
worksheet dated 1/25/01.  We need to revisit the MACs.
4.  They think a 3rd party debt threshold of $1mm is too low for them, they
suggested a threshold of $10mm.
5.  The agreement provides for annual and quarterly financial statements.  I
don't think they have quarterly.  You need talk to them about what they
can/will provide.

If you would like to talk to Reid directly, his ph no. is 509/252-5096.

By the way, Reid is an old buddy of Bill Bradford from Reid's Avista/PG&E
days, and Reid sends his regards to Bill.  If you see Bill pass this message
on...


Shelley and Steve,

As you know, we have been working with facilities to develop options to replace or improve our 75KVA UPS that provides power to the Gas Control environment. My recommendation at this time is that we stand pat with the current 75KVA UPS and the redundancy that we currently have in place. Given the uncertainties of the status and ownership of the 40KVA UPS on EB44, and given Mr. Cooper's stated intention of moving out of this building, it simply doesn't make sense to spend the $28K estimated to leverage the 40KVA UPS on EB44. I've talked with Randy Lord and he is comfortable with us continuing to rely on the 75KVA unit for the near term.

I do want to thank facilities for their efforts, particularly Charles Upshaw, who provided a great deal of assistance in reviewing what equipment was available and how we might leverage the equipment.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Thanks, Gary

Gary Kenagy
ETS Information Technology
713-853-3094
gary.kenagy@enron.com


Another request for the EnronOnline Team.  Any conflicts?


yes

herve.duteil@americas.bnpparibas.com on 04/10/2001 07:20:32 AM
To: john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Henry Hub instead of NYMEX...

Hi John !

My mistake again early morning...  I clicked on Gas Daily Henry Hub (EOL
#1107435,    I buy 5,000 MMBtu/day  May @ 5.51)  instead of NYMEX.

Could you change it to NYMEX ?

Thank you and sorry again,

Herve

______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis
a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous
recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir
immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute
diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf
autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS
(et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message,
dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the
addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please
delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure,
either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS
(and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message
if modified.
______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________


Lorraine Lindberg's Accomplishments.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:10 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	FW: 2001 Accomplishments

Kim - I forgot this one, please add it to my list:

New TW receipt point with NGPL in Eddy Cty., NM.  In service date week of 12/24/01.  Increment supply to TW of 60,500 MMBtu/d.

Kim - Apparently I can't add.  The revenues under the BP Red Rock deal are $20,805,000 which brings my total deal dollars to $45,016,762.00.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	2001 Accomplishments

2001 Accomplishments:

1)	FT Deals

BP Energy
55,000/d Ignacio to Blanco 2002, max rate =		$2,047,650.
20,000/d Ignacio to Blanco 2003, max rate =		$   744,600.
100,000/d EOT pool to pool, alt del west 3/0
$0.01 demand,						$     31,000.
30/70 % sharing mechanism west =			$   500,000.
22,000/d I/B Link, 2002, max rate =			$   819,000.

Total BP						$4,142,250.

Duke Field Services
20,000/d EOT - EOT, $0.06, 13 mos. =			$   475,200.

PNM
5 year EOT - EOT, $0.08 = 				$1,270,400.

2)	Red Rock Deals

US Gypsum
4,500/d, 12.25 yrs. =					$8,450,662.
Frito Lay
2,700/d, 15 yrs.
5,300/d, 1 yr = 						$9,873,250.
BP Energy
15,000/d, 10 yrs. =					$15,323,915.

Calpine*
40,000/d, 15 yrs = 					$83,220,000.*	(Jeff Fawcett)

Total (does not include Calpine)				$39,535,677.

3)	Projects
Red Rock Expansion, Project Coordinator
2 new FT shippers to TW:  USGypsum and Frito Lay

Lorraine


I apologize to those of you who are getting this twice - I want to make sure that everyone gets it.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bennett, Stephen
Sent:	Sunday, June 03, 2001 8:53 AM
To:	Roberts, Mike A.
Subject:	Sunday Weather Update 06/03

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron on 06/03/2001 08:53 AM ---------------------------

 	  From:  Stephen Bennett                           06/03/2001 08:37 AM

To:	"Allen, Phil@Home" <pallen70@hotmail.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, John Arnold/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mike Grigsby/ENRON@enronXgate, "Grigsby, Mike@Home" <MikeGrigsby@hotmail.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Keavey, Peter@Home" <pkeavey@hotmail.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Kelli Stevens@home" <rjkdstevens@aol.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, "Lewis, Andy@Home" <ahl-34@yahoo.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Mike Maggi/ENRON@enronXgate, Jose Marquez/ENRON@enronXgate, Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate, "Martin, Thomas A.@Home" <tmartin3079@msn.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Scott Neal/ENRON@enronXgate, "Neal, Scott@home" <sneal12@mindspring.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Pereira, Susan@Home" <pereira@houston.rr.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Kevin Ruscitti/ENRON@enronXgate, Jim Schwieger/ENRON@enronXgate, "Schwieger, Jim@Home" <Jim.Schwieger@rr.houston.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, "Shively, Hunter@Home" <hunter-jessica@houston.rr.com>@SMTP@enronXgate, Hunter S Shively/ENRON@enronXgate, "Tom Donohoe@home" <tomcdonohoe@netzero.net>@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:

Subject:	Sunday Weather Update 06/03

Hi Everyone...

1)  The forecast pattern seems very similar to what we've been talking about over the past several days.  6-10 features below normal in the Midwest and the East with a brief normalization possible toward the Great Lakes next weekend (days 8 and 9) before more cool air arrives.  11-15 indicates yet another trough digging into the East (temperatures normal to below normal) with the primary ridge remaining in the Southwest (above to much above).

2) 1-5 Day forecast also looks similar still quite cool for the East and Midwest - though not quite as hot for the immediate West Coast.  Above to much above normal temperatures will be common across interior California for most of the week with a 1 to 2 day spike of warm temperatures near the coast mid-week.  No prolonged period of heat will affect the Northwest.

3) EarthSat will issue an "official" 6-10 and 11-15 forecast around 2pm today.  You can get this map by going to:  http://www.earthsat.com/misc/enron/   and then follow the "Sunday Update" link (near the bottom).  Login is "enron", Password is "enron".

Maps are attached - this is the way we feel things will look to start the day tomorrow.  *If there are any changes to this picture - it may be to warm the Midwest/ East closer to normal.  Right now this solution appears unlikely - but if there are any surprises tomorrow - it may be a SLIGHTLY warmer picture for the East.*

Enjoy the rest of your weekend...
Research Weather Team

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


sounds perfect, -- do you need cash or is a check okay?


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001
08:39 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/07/2001 09:09 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--3/7/01


It would be useful for me to have the opportunity to listen in on these
calls.  Let me know if that's a problem.

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	04/12/2001 10:04 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Litigation Team Meeting

I will plan on attending weekly.  Let me know if anyone else should go?

Jim

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001
10:03 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark E Haedicke@ECT on 04/12/2001 05:45 PM
Sent by: Janette Elbertson@ECT
To: William S Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Rick Buy/Enron@EnronXGate,
mday@gmssr.com, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, James Derrick/Enron@EnronXGate,
cecklund@llgm.com, gfergus@brobeck.com, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron,
Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, jklauberg@llgm.com, John J
Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Michael Smith/ENRON@enronxgate, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael
Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Williams/ENRON@enronxgate, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/EES@EES, Tammie Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/Enron@EnronXGate, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES,
Stephanie Harris/Enron@EnronXGate, Karen K Heathman/Enron@EnronXGate, Twanda
Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: California Litigation Team

 Starting on Thursday,  April 19, at 2:00 p.m. there will be a weekly
telephone conference for the California litigation team.  The objective will
be to identify key issues and plan a coordinated strategy for all litigation
in California.  The call will last not more than one hour.

 Thus far, the responsibility has been allocated as follows:

1. PG&E Bankruptcy   Lisa Mellencamp and Carl Ecklund (LeBoeuf Lamb Greene &
McRae)

2. Class Actions   Richard Sanders and Robin Gibbs (Gibbs & Bruns)

3. CTC Matters   Bob Williams, Mike Day and Gary Fergus (Brobeck)

4. FERC Matters    Regulatory and Richard Sanders and Dan Watkiss (Bracewell
& Patterson)

5. Government Investigations Regulatory and Richard Sanders

 Richard Sanders and Robin Gibbs will have overall responsibility for
coordination of the litigation.


Attached are the descriptions of the physical power business.  Thanks for
your help!


Hi Richard.  I was just wondering if you sent this to me because of my recent
inquiry to Joe re: personnel profiles for power marketing/trading folks for
our Australia efforts?  thanks

Richard Ingersoll@ECT
02/19/2000 08:52 PM
To: Rebecca A. McDonald@ENRON
cc: All Enron Worldwide@ENRON

Subject: Re: Paul Quilkey

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca A. McDonald @ ENRON                           02/18/2000 05:51
PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Paul Quilkey

Please join me in congratulating Paul Quilkey in his new role as Vice
President leading our efforts in Australia.  Joe Hirl has assumed a leading
role in the formation of our business in Japan.  Joe also has regional
responsibility for trading activity.

Paul's appointment is in recognition of the critical role Paul has played in
Enron Australia's successful commencement and the body of outstanding work he
has accumulated to date in his career with Enron. It is worth noting that
Paul joined Enron as recently as the Associate intake of 1995.  In the short
time since then Paul has developed and grown through various positions to his
current Trading and Origination role, a position of great responsibility in a
dynamic young business making aggressive inroads into the Australian market,
and far from Enron's traditional US markets.

Please join me in congratulating Paul on his appointment.

Rebecca


Summary Risk Data as of 10/26/2001

Active Financial Deals	52
Active Physical Deals	35
P&L  Daily ($thousands)	78.0
VaR ($thousands)	450.8

ETS Margin Account Deals	0

Physical deals modelled in the Caminus Zainet system are deals which have some form of price risk, (i.e. Index to index deals, and anticipated fuel sales) This does not include standard transport or storage agreements.

P&L  Daily:   Daily change in the  mark-to-market (MTM) valuation of all deals being tracked in the Caminus Zainet system.  This includes the origination and changes in value for both the physical and financial sides of hedges, along with any speculative trades and floating unhedged phsycal positions.

VaR is "Value at Risk":  Enron Corp policy defines this as the maximum expected one day loss on the portfolio given a 95% statistical confidence interval.  This number is currently calculated on the Caminus system using a variance covariance metholodogy, rather than a Monte Carlo simulation per the Enron Corp policy.

NOTE: We are reviewing the modelling of one of the financial deals which may have a significant impact on the numbers reported above.

More detailed reports are available from the Caminus Zainet risk management system.  Please call Vince Strohmeyer at 713.853.6701 with any questions you may have.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/07/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,114
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,106
Total Life to Date Transactions	414,524

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/07/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,512	75%
Enron Europe Limited	145	37%
Global Products	159	30%
Enron Metals	298	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	47%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,629,499,517
MTD	12,634,782,454
LTD	226,066,467,133
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,141,702,594

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	15,798,097,545

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	550
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,213
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,857
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,695


This is a tremendous 1980 example of a large Deborah Butterfield.  I think it
would be worth seriously considering....
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2001
03:49 PM ---------------------------

"Michael Rosenfeld" <mr@michaelrosenfeldglry.com> on 01/05/2001 03:50:39 PM
To: "Shankman, Jeff" <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: F:\Artists and Estates\Butterfield, Deborah\Butterfield.jpg

 F:\Artists and Estates\Butterfield, Deborah\Butterfield.jpg
 - Butterfield.jpg


No.  In fact, Gulf has been asked by AEC to join them in a meeting with
WFEC.  Is there any problem from your perspective with Gulf participating in
such a meeting?  Now that our joint petition for declaratory statement has
been filed, Gulf has agreed to attend such a meeting which is in the process
of being set up for sometime in the next 7 to 10 days.  Of course, we intend
to hold to the position stated in the joint petition and assume that you
would as well.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [SMTP:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 10:26 AM
> To: JASTONE@southernco.com
> Cc: Chris.Hilgert@enron.com; Mark.Knippa@enron.com; susanc@katzlaw.com
> Subject: RE: petition for declaratory statement
>
> Jeff,  At this point we are considering approaching WFEC and AEC to
> discuss this with them.  Do you see any potential pitfalls from your side
> with doing so?
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Stone, Jeff A.
>  Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 7:31 AM
>  To: ''Gerald.Nemec@enron.com' '
>  Cc: ''susanc@katzlaw.com' '; ''Mark.Knippa@enron.com' ';
> ''Chris.Hilgert@enron.com' '; Anthony, Timothy S. (Gulf Power); Badders,
> Russell A.; Livingston, Robert G.; Ritenour, Susan D.
>  Subject: RE: petition for declaratory statement
>  Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>  Here is the "official" information from the FPSC website about our
> joint filing:
>
>  Docket No. 010265-EI      Docketed: 2/26/01
>       Joint petition for declaratory statement concerning eligibility
> of public utility to serve customer pursuant to Section 366.03, Florida
> Statutes, by Gulf Power Company and Enron Compression Services Company.
>
>  As of the close of business on 2/27, there was no further
> information available
>
>
>
>


This document will serve as a receipt for $89.00 paid in the month of
February for Parking.  The receipt is issued by Enron Property and Services,
Parking and Transportation Desk to TAYLOR,MARK E, Social Security Number
********* .  The company subsidy paid for the month of February is $50.00.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron on 05/28/2002 01:14
PM ---------------------------

Kim Nguyen
05/23/2002 12:20 PM
To: Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: downtime allocation document and parameter list

attached is the file you've requested. My testing documentation is exactly
the same, except in different format.

hope this help!

Kim

---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Nguyen/EWC/Enron on 05/23/2002 12:32
PM ---------------------------

Garth Ripton
04/16/2002 12:33 AM
To: Erik Ellis/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Kim Nguyen/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: downtime allocation document and parameter list

Hi Erik,

I worked on this for a little while last night but I couldn't get a modem
connection from the Hotel. I hope the timing is OK. The confirmed counters
are highlighted in green. The counters that need to be corrected are
highlighted in red. Most of the corrections are due to the fact that the
fault/status messages that are the result of enabling a "manual" operation
mode (for example, manual yaw) increment the maintenance counter not the
"turbine OK" counter. Unfortunately, there are many faults that we could not
confirm using the turbine simulator. If you have any questions Kim Nguyen is
the person who did the actual testing. I forwarded the results to Mark
Fischer and Mark Walker so they could check to see if this is the way we want
the counters incremented for the given fault conditions but have yet to get
any feedback. The faults that we could not test should be confirmed by
looking at the Bachmann software. Hopefully this will occur in the near
future. For now, this is the best information we have.

-Garth


I was not notified of any scheduling issues over the long Holiday weekend.

Socal called an OFO for the Gas Day of the 22nd. That was the only one called to my knowledge.


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041702.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Are we OK with this confidential treatment?

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/15/2001 11:21 AM -----

	CRCommunications <CRCommunications@caiso.com> 05/15/2001 09:13 AM Please respond to "Sole, Jeanne"; Please respond to " Formanek, Norma" ; Please respond to " Robinson, Charlie" 	   To: ISO Market Participants <IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTICIPANTS@caiso.com>  cc:   Subject: CAISO Notice: Subpoena from the California State Senate Select Co mmittee to Investigate Price Manipulation of the Wholesale Energy Market

Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

Attached please find a letter from the California State Senate Select
Committee to Investigate Price Manipulation of the Wholesale Energy Market
indicating the confidential treatment it will afford confidential
information submitted by the CA ISO to the Committee in response to the
subpoena circulated to Market Participants on April 30 (attached).  The
letter provides that the deadline for a response by the CA ISO is extended
to Friday, May 18 at 9:00 AM.  This message is to inform Market Participants
that the CA ISO will comply with the subpoena in a timely manner unless it
gets a valid court order to the contrary by close of business (5:00 PM)
Thursday, May 17.  The CA ISO will seek confidential treatment under the
letter for information subject to 20.3 of the CA ISO tariff and other
confidential material.

Any concerns relating to the subpoena should be communicated to Jeanne Sole
at 916-608-7144 and jsole@caiso.com <mailto:jsole@caiso.com>  and copied to
Charlie Robinson at crobinson@caiso.com <mailto:crobinson@caiso.com>  and
Norma Formanek at nformanek@fbm.com <mailto:nformanek@fbm.com> . The
relevant contact related to the subpoena is on the subpoena itself.
Jeanne M. Sol?
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.

 - Senate Confidentiality Agmt.pdf
 - SenatorS.pdf


FYI.  Thanks very much for you help on this.  Let the games begin.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/11/2001 11:26 AM -----

	Steven J Kean
	Sent by: Maureen McVicker
	07/11/2001 10:17 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: skean@enron.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard B Sanders/Enron@EnronXGate,
mpalmer@enron.com, gfergus@brobeck.com, mlk@pkns.com, Scott Govenar
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, hgovenar@govadv.com
		 Subject: FINAL

Attached is the final letter.  Please note - there was a small change at the
top of page 2.


Colleagues:

The first draft of the accomplishments for GA has been discussed with Rick
and Jim this morning.   Although most of the inputs were there, some
important ones were still missing.

The second draft is planned for Friday June 1st, and the final for June 8th.
The week difference between 1st, and 8th will be spent entirely on
addressing the appropriate methodologies to arrive at the dollar value for
your work/accomplishment.  I promise that you--each for her/his
accomplishments --shall be personally involved in determining the appropriate
methodology so that to reflect your work in the most accurate manner.
Accordingly, I would appreciate very much that all your accomplishments
should reach me as soon as possible so that to allocate as much time for
methodology and communication with you.  A report is currently being prepared
of the compiled methodologies submitted so far and I shall send it you with
the hope that it will be of help.

I also want to communicate that the process of sending your accomplishments
is not really voluntary;  it is PRC related.  Therefore, I am really seeking
your help and support to complete this task.

Of course, please let me know if you have any question or I can be of any
help.

Brgrds

----- Forwarded by Amr Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/25/2001 02:10 PM -----

	Marcia A Linton@ENRON
	05/10/2001 08:16 AM

		 To: Amr Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: GA accomplishments for the period November 2000 - April 2001

---------------------- Forwarded by Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001
08:16 AM ---------------------------
From: Amr Ibrahim@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/09/2001 02:11 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Lysa Akin/Enron@EnronXGate, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES,
Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald
Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Chauncey Hood/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: GA accomplishments for the period November 2000 - April 2001

Colleagues:

I am seeking your help to compile the accomplishment for GA during the period
Nov 2000 - April 2001.  Of course, these accomplishments are the summation of
your efforts either individually or through your group, and the total shall
indicate the contribution of GA to the corporate objectives of Enron.  The
aggregation of your inputs shall be one of the primary sources that Rick and
Steve will use in communicating GA impact to all stakeholders in the
company.

I would like to suggest to use the attached excel file to document your
accomplishment for the period.  I hope that it shall assist you to identify
your contribution, your estimate of value, and a line, or two, explaining the
methodology you used to arrive at your value.

I hope to receive your inputs by  May 16th (next Wednesday), so that I can
compile the inputs and issue the first draft for discussion by Monday 21st.

Of course, please let me know if you have any question.

Brgrds

AI


Dear E204-1 and E204-2 Students,
Please find attached a copy of the students assigned to their project teams
for Team Assignment #1 (and #2).  There were two students in E204-1 who
had not signed on to a team, and I arbitrarily placed them on the 3-person
teams (so all teams are of size 4 or 5).  If this does not work, please let
me know in lecture on Wednesday.  Also, one student, Barrett Rangarajan
in E204-1, was signed on to two teams so I left Barrett on the first team
that he was listed with (Team #1) -- let me know if this is in error.
Team Assignment #1 is due on Wednesday/Thursday, April 19/20 by 6 PM
-- they must be submitted in the appropriate lecture for the group as listed
on the attached sheets.  Although a Wednesday group may have a Thursday
member, they must turn the paper in on Wednesday.  Late penalties will
apply to late papers at the rate of 1-point per day late.  Do not rely on the
Haas printer to be available and in working order at 5:45 PM on the due date.

--Tom McCullough

=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================


there is a band?  what is going on this weekend?


Return-path: <VKaminski@aol.com>
From: VKaminski@aol.com
Full-name: VKaminski
Message-ID: <f7.14ac9ccb.2971f696@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:29:10 EST
Subject: Fwd: Hello!
To: VKaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_53.10f3231f.2971f696_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10551

Return-path: <VKaminski@aol.com>
From: VKaminski@aol.com
Full-name: VKaminski
Message-ID: <42.206267c9.296fc354@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:25:56 EST
Subject: Fwd: Hello!
To: VKaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part3_53.10f3231f.296fc354_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10551

Return-path: <VKaminski@aol.com>
From: VKaminski@aol.com
Full-name: VKaminski
Message-ID: <6c.145b2036.294d4c74@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 20:01:40 EST
Subject: Fwd: Hello!
To: VKaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part4_53.10f3231f.294d4c74_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10539

Return-path: <VKaminski@aol.com>
From: VKaminski@aol.com
Full-name: VKaminski
Message-ID: <9.1fe5974c.2945a1a8@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:27:04 EST
Subject: Fwd: Hello!
To: VKaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part5_53.10f3231f.2945a1a8_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10539

Return-path: <VKaminski@aol.com>
From: VKaminski@aol.com
Full-name: VKaminski
Message-ID: <29.1f134cf9.2942f70d@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 23:54:37 EST
Subject: Fwd: Hello!
To: VKaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part6_53.10f3231f.2942f70d_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10539

Return-Path: <21stInsight@KingwoodCable.com>
Received: from  rly-za05.mx.aol.com (rly-za05.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.101]) by air-za01.mail.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILINZA110-1207200513; Fri, 07 Dec 2001 20:05:13 -0500
Received: from  moffatmail.kingwoodcable.com (moffatmail.kingwoodcable.com [208.223.8.79]) by rly-za05.mx.aol.com (v82.22) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINZA55-1207200446; Fri, 07 Dec 2001 20:04:46 -0500
Received: from bob (alpha15136.kingwoodcable.com [208.223.15.136]) by moffatmail.kingwoodcable.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)	id Y2P7B69X; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 19:00:54 -0600
Message-ID: <006601c17f84$3f0223c0$880fdfd0@bob>
From: "Bob Schorr" <21stInsight@KingwoodCable.com>
To: <vkaminski@aol.com>
Subject: Hello!
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 19:04:10 -0600
Organization: 21st Insight Strategic Consultants
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0063_01C17F51.F402FE80"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Vince:

For some reason, I found it very easy to leave Enron last  February.  I had been blessed with a great run, but I knew the future for  me lay elsewhere.

I didn't look back, I moved on.  But for the past week, I've been  drawn back to reconnect - to check on friends and others I worked with to see  how they're (you're) doing.  I enjoyed the time we spent together  in the EGS, ECT, etc. days.  Vince,  I always respected  and admired the way you conducted yourself.  You were talented and hard  working.  You put together an outstanding team.  You  achieved, deservedly, much success in your time at Enron.  But you never  let it get to your head.  You were always friendly and gracious to  everyone.  The environment at Enron allowed and even sometimes encouraged  people to be otherwise, but you resisted.  You have Class.

Are you still part of the "clean-up crew" or have you moved on?  If  you're still there, thank you.

I hope this finds you well (given the shock of all things Enron).  You  most assuredly have a bright future.  Enjoy the exploration of where life  will lead you next.

Take care!  Call or write if you wish.

God Bless,

-Bob

Robert C. Schorr
21st Insight Strategic Consultants
281.360.0023  (phone & fax)


Attached are summarized the main recommendations of the distco of the future paper and  their impact.
Most recommendations would have a positive impact on competition. However, some recommendations could be potentially dangerous. Besides, it does not have a clear position regarding unbundling: it opens too many unbundling possibilities and discards the extreme, and more effective (divestiture).
I will work on the default supplier paper today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 2:01 PM
To:	Canovas, Guillermo
Subject:	FW: DISCO of the Future Meeting 10/24/01 Agenda and Materials
Importance:	High

Are these papers consistent with Enron's positions?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Hope Duncan" <hduncan@caem.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 1:28 PM
To:	hduncan@caem.org
Subject:	DISCO of the Future Meeting 10/24/01 Agenda and Materials
Importance:	High

MEMORANDUM

TO: DISCO of the Future Participants
FR: Hope Duncan, Director of Administration
RE: Meeting Materials
DT: October 18, 2001

Please find attached the agenda for next week's DISCO meeting.  I also
have attached the materials for the meeting -- the regulatory white
paper and the POLR paper.

Please address all questions and/or comments regarding the
aforementioned materials during the meeting.

 - DISCO-Regulation-MembersDraft(010907v14).doc << File: DISCO-Regulation-MembersDraft(010907v14).doc >>
 - DISCO POLR Revised.doc << File: DISCO POLR Revised.doc >>
 - DISCO October Agenda.doc << File: DISCO October Agenda.doc >>


Please read the attached summary of Coogler's response to the audit
findings.  I would like to get the group together later this week to
determine next steps.

Jim, Dan and Janet:  I would appreciate you all paying special attention to
the claims.  Do you all know what Bruce is referring to?  If you all can do
some research before the meeting, I think we'll be able to get to our next
steps quicker.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
10:44 PM ---------------------------

richard.j.feldmann@us.arthurandersen.com on 09/18/2000 08:29:49 PM
To: BHerod@Enron.com
cc: danny.d.rudloff@us.arthurandersen.com,
frederick.g.rhodes@us.arthurandersen.com,
matthew.l.thomas@us.arthurandersen.com
Subject: Re: Coogler's Response

Brenda,

Matthew reviewed Coogler's responses and brings up the following questions.

We can do one-of-two things at this point.  We can either add the Reliant
responses to our audit report as "Auditee Responses", or we can have Enron
provide answers and possibly have us do some additional work.  The additional
work is dependent on Enron's answers to the questions.

Please advise.

Rick

To:   Frederick G. Rhodes, Richard J. Feldmann
cc:
Date: 09/18/2000 04:29 PM
From: Matthew L. Thomas, Houston , (713) 237-2629
Subject:  Coogler's Response

Rick and Fred:

I hope things are going well up in Salt Lake City.  I have gone through all of
Bruce's numbers today.  I have come up with a few questions that Enron needs
to
answer.

1. Reliant claims that in East Texas the cut off for complementary customers
is
30 Mcf/ day,  does Enron agree?
2. Reliant claims that the "New Technology Contract" overrides  or is an
exception to the Enfolio Master Agreement.  Does Enron agree that this is a
legitimate exception?
3. Reliant claims that all off the industrial mis-classified gas in the
Houston
Division is under "special contracts" with special pricing, and even though
they
are using less than 100 Mcf /day they receive a lower price of 2.71 per MMBTU.
Does Enron agree that this is a legitimate exception?
4. In the Houston Division it appears that Louisiana Pacific only uses gas for
heating in the winter, about three months out of the year.  Is there total
divided by three to find their average usage, or is it divided by 12?  Bruce
divided by three, we divided by twelve.  They are a customer all year, and are
not a new customer, or a customer that has left.
5. Does Enron want to give Reliant leeway on the 100 Mcf rule?  What will the
actual cut off be?  Bruce backs out 137,000 Mcf that was close, but not quite
100 Mcf.

These are the issues that I see.  The first three questions are things that
Enron may have to ask Bracewell and Patterson.  We were not notified of any of
the special contracts that he mentions.  Let me know what I need to do.  If
you
guys have questions for me, it might be easier if we all got on the phone and
spoke about it.  Thanks,

Matthew

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.


Today's Washington Post contains a favorable comment on negawatts attributed
to House Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman Tauzin, following efforts we
made yesterday with the Chairman and his staff, both directly and via our
consultants.  The Post article reads, "In the coming months, Tauzin said,
Congress will take steps to allow consumers to sell power back to their local
energy grids."  We, of course, will continue to push for a version of this
concept that keeps this process open to multiple buyers and sellers, not just
the local utility.  The article dovetails with information directly from
Chairman Tauzin and Chairman Barton that they will continue to push our
demand buydown proposal, although we are working with them to shore up
support on the committee in the face of opposition from the usual suspects.


Kate, what's the status?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/05/2001 05:16 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal for Mike Swerzbin1

Yep - the trade's there all right. I just talked to Mike again and he said
he'd love to take the trade, but he's sure it's an error. To avoid any
confusion later, and because he's already left the office for today, let's
have Mike talk to his Amerex broker tomorrow morning and clear this up. He
just might get a sweet deal out of it!

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/05/2001 03:19 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal for Mike Swerzbin1

This is what amerex is showing and this is what I have confirmed.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                04/05/2001 04:59 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Deal for Mike Swerzbin1

Mike did a deal with these terms but a price of 380 - deal is #571917. But he
said a price like $292.50 doesn't sound right for Sept. - possibly May?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/05/2001 03:03 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing Deal for Mike Swerzbin1

Amerex is showing a deal on their checkout I did not verbal

Enron buys from Aquila Sept. 01 PV 25 mw peak hrs at $292.50


Jeff,

     Thanks again for taking the time to meet with Alfredo and I yesterday.
We felt the meeting was very useful and informative.  Talk with you soon.

Mark


AGA for 2/2/01 is -105

Website information:
http://gasfundy.corp.enron.com/gas/framework/default.asp
Drop down Box to "Storage"
In-house Analysis
My files are the last three files.

When the dialog box asks to upadate links click "NO".


I think I wrote his PRC


---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 11/02/99 10:14 AM
---------------------------

Mark Courtney
11/02/99 10:02 AM
To: Brian O'Rourke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Howard/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Reid Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Scarborough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Davis
Thames/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dorie Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Bachand/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harold Bertram/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey A Austin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Knippa/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Homecoming

Just a reminder, guys.  Keep your calendars open!

Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Courtney/HOU/ECT on 11/02/99 09:58
AM ---------------------------

"Tim Graves" <ttgraves@email.msn.com> on 10/28/99 01:22:37 PM
To: Mark Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Homecoming

Hello fellow Rice Alums (and other generous benefactors)!

It's that time again.....Rice 1999 Homecoming.  And we all know what that
means, don't we?.....

That's right, the complete and utter chaos at the

Tenth Annual

Bump, Stan, Kirk, Tim, Hugh, Mark2 and Jim??Rice Homecoming Tailgate Party??The day:  Saturday, November 13, 1999??The time:  10:00 am till the beer's gone (plan on using your headlights?when?you leave)??Where:  Rice Stadium Parking Lot--Entrance 12 off of Rice Boulevard??The game:  Uh, I think we're playing tackle football in that big stadium?thingie at 1 pm, but I haven't bothered to find out against who yet (or for?the last nine years either).??But, as you all know, we do this without the help of the University (well,?okay, this year they're supplying Veldtman).  So why are you getting this?message??.....?.....?.....?We need you!??As we move from renegade tailgaters to officially recognized renegade?tailgaters, we find ourselves with the peculiar circumstance of having to?pre-fund the party, leaving behind the treasured Rice tradition of begging?money from the party participants at the party itself.??We hate this. I mean, we really, really hate this.??Instead of waiting until everybody's drunk and generous, we have to hope?that you're sitting here reading this, half-schnookered on cheap mescal,?too?drunk to find the bathroom in time, but still coherent enough to work a pen?and write a check.??You know the score -- parties happen because people make them happen. In?years past, we've managed to find enough Jagermeister-blasted friends to?agree to sponsor a keg. This year will be no different -- we will find?enough sponsors, but only if you cooperate by getting yourselves drunk for?us...??One bonus of sponsoring a keg -- you will be officially recognized at the?party, and you will receive a commemorative certificate, suitable for?framing. We are also accepting ideas for other expressions of our?gratitude...??Since the alumni office has been perceptive enough to notice that everybody?goes to this party, they've decided to list us on their brochure, and we?thought we'd take a page from their book and institute different levels of?giving to this oh-so-worthy cause.??As a result, we have developed the following levels which correspond?roughly?to the Alumni Office's levels:???$15?Fajita Fund: Members of this society contribute to enable Chef Gustas to once ?again delight the party goers with his culinary expertise.??$30?Beer Fund: Since each keg costs sixty dollars, many of our recent alumni ?choose to sponsor half a keg, and they share credit on the keg itself with ?another Beer Funder.??$60?Sponsor's Fund: Sponsors are the backbone of the annual giving for the ?Tailgate Party. Each Sponsor has undertaken the responsibility of sponsoring ?an entire keg for the party. Without the Sponsors, the Homecoming Tailgate ?Party tradition would not be able to continue as it has.??$????Founders' Society: This society is sort of like a cult....Nobody is really ?sure how they got there, and no one seems to know how or why they stay. But ?in truth, each Founder agrees to contribute his portion of whatever expenses ?remain after all other Funds gifts have been spent. These Members are not ?independently wealthy, however, which is why all of the Funds and their ?contributors are so important to the ultimate success of the Tailgate Party.??We are really late getting this message out this year, but we promise that ?this year will be even bigger and better than last year's blowout.  And as ?such, please get those checks in now!  And if you're gonna contribute,?please e-mail Tim Graves to let him know (he's the budget guy) at ?ttgraves@msn.com?so that we can tell the beer guys.??Send your much needed support to:??Tim Harvey?Computer Science Department?Rice University--MS 132?6100 S. Main St.?Houston, Texas 77005??(Please make checks payable to Tim Harvey.)??(Also, if you include your email address on your check, Tim will send you?confirmation of receipt of said funds!)??Or, if you would like to find out more, please call or email Hugh Kress at?(713-771-7671) or hkress@awd.com or Tim Graves at (713-668-2630) or?ttgraves@mns.com or Kirk Oden at (210)-829-5126 or skoden@aol.com??We'll keep track of everyone who gives to the cause and let everyone at the?party know how much we love you.??See you there!!!??Bump, Stan, Kirk, Tim, Hugh, Mark and Jim??P.S.  However you got this message....please forward it to all your?friends, let's get the message out!??P.P.S.  Check out our website at www.cs.rice.edu/~harv/tailgate.html?????????? ? - att1.htm???


Thank you very much! I will pass your name and number on to him - his name is Andrew Mintz.

Thanks again -

Missy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cash, Michelle
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:49 PM
To:	Stevens, Missy
Subject:	RE: quick question

I would be happy to talk with him.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stevens, Missy
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:54 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	FW: quick question

Hi Michelle! See my note to Janet below... could I have this guy call you, or is there someone in your group that he could call? I greatly appreciate it!

Missy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moore, Janet H.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:58 AM
To:	Stevens, Missy
Subject:	RE: quick question

Michelle Cash, a lawyer in our group, coordinates our recruiting.  If she can't do it, I would be certainly be happy to chat with him over the phone about it.
Hope all is well.
Janet

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Stevens, Missy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Moore, Janet H.
Subject:	quick question

I worked with someone on a project that APQC did for us, and he is now looking for a new opportunity (just our of law school). I let him know that Enron doesn't typically hire right out of law school, but was wondering if there might be someone he could talk to about "a day in the life of a corporate lawyer."  Is there someone in particular who handles recruiting for legal?

Thanks for your help!

Missy


i think pat and i have decided to wait until he can be listed on the loan
before we actually lock this thing up.  we are still going to do it, but we
both feel better about having both names on the documents.  can you tell me
exactly how long we will ahve to wait after he starts working?


Wow. That's fascinating. Sounds neat.  I would be very concerned, though,
given the current environment about having us listed as a sponsor.  In short,
I would recommend against sponsoring, at least at this point.

Best,
Jeff

	Susan J Mara
	04/12/2001 11:06 AM

		 To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bill Jones will be keynote speaker for WPTF meeting in June

Bill Jones has announced to run against Davis.  gary Ackerman is asking for
sponsors to pay the costs of the dinner.  He will publicize the sponsors.
The attendees include all WPTF members (munis, BPA, other power marketers),
plus invitees -- CPUC staff, ISO staff and sometimes FERC staff come.  What
do you think

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001 08:03 AM -----

	Gary Ackerman <foothill@lmi.net>
	03/21/2001 04:17 PM
	Please respond to foothill

		 To: Bill Ross <billr@calpine.com>, Bob Anderson <Robert_Anderson@apses.com>,
Carolyn Baker <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, CHARLES A MIESSNER
<camiessn@newwestenergy.com>, Corby Gardin <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, curt
hatton <curt.hatton@neg.pge.com>, Curtis Kebler
<Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>, Denice Cazalet Purdum <dpurdum@apx.com>,
Greg Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, Jack Pigott <jackp@calpine.com>, Janie Mollon
<jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>, Nam Nguyen <Nam.Nguyen@powersrc.com>, Randy
Hickok <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, Rob Nichol <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
robert berry <berry@apx.com>, Roger Pelote <roger.pelote@williams.com>, Sue
Mara <smara@enron.com>, Jeff Crowe <jcrowe@apx.com>, George Vaughn
<gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, "Huhman, Steve" <steve.huhman@mirant.com>, Dan
Douglass <douglass@arterhadden.com>, Barb Ennis <baennis@earthlink.net>, Lynn
Lednicky <LALE@dynegy.com>, Mark Smith <Mark_J_Smith@fpl.com>, Bob Reilley
<rreilley@coral-energy.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Bill Jones will be keynote speaker for WPTF meeting in June

On the evening of Thursday, June 21, at Ojai Inn, Secretary of State
Bill Jones will be our keynote speaker at our WPTF General Meeting.  Rob
Lapsley, Bill's Undersecretary just called an told me the good news.
Jones is the front running candidate to challenge Gov Gray Davis in
2002.

Here is what I am thinking.  I would like to solicit among our esteemed
Board members sponsors for the dinner that evening.  I anticipate that
we would attract possibly 70+ guests and members, and the dinner bill
could be around $100/person with the open bar.  Which of you members
would like to be sponsors?  Will divide the cost equally among the
sponsors, and make sure to mention your names as sponsors for the
dinner.

gba


Here's a start.  Be happy to add.  Just let me know.

Best,
Jeff

CPUC--	Geoff Brown--Commissioner
	Paul Clanon--Chief, Energy Division
	General Counsel (don't know name)

CEC--	Chairman of Commission
	Chief of power plant siting department
	Person in charge of "green marketing" (Stacey Bolton will know who the person is)

Enviros--	Ralph Cavanagh, NRDC, SF
		Dan Kirshner, EDF, Oakland
		V. John White, Sierra Club, Sacramento

Consumer reps--Mike Florio, TURN, SF
		Michael Shames, UCAN, San Diego

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Catherine
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 3:15 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	stakeholder list

Jeff,
Thanks, in advance, for your help with this.  The project is a "Corporate Responsibility Stakeholder Perception Survey" designed to gather baseline information on how our stakeholders view the issue of corporate social responsibility in general, and Enron in that regard in our major markets US, UK and Japan. Stakeholders are defined as those who are affected by our business, can affect our business or have an interest in Enron - customers, suppliers, governments, regulators, NGOs, employees, shareholders, etc.

What I would like from you is which stakeholders you think are important to include from Enron Corp's perspective here in California, and the job title or name therein. Please just take 5 minutes or so to list them, don't spend any longer than that.

CPUC - who?
CEC - who?
any others...

I already have the major environmental organizations, but if you think TURN or others should be included, let me know.

Thanks so much!
Catherine

Catherine McKalip-Thompson
Manager, Corporate Responsibility
Enron Corp.
Tel: 415-782-7842
Fax: 415-782-7854


Dear Louise,

Here is our marked-up text of the Quick Start Guide.

Justin/Edmund

Louise Kitchen
10/09/99 05:47
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
gilbergd@sullcrom.com, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Goddard/LON/ECT@ECT, Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT, Rahil
Jafry/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Getting started guide

Please come back with comments on this document by the end of play Friday, we
are going to use this document to send to customers with their passwords
(once they have signed the password application agreement.

Sorry about the rush but we are moving pretty quickly now.

Graphics need to format but content is what I need you to look at.

Louise


Kimberly -

Check this out:

http://www.lascruces.org/

Tell me what flight we're on...


He has.  He now works with EGM.

joe

From: Tana Jones on 09/29/2000 08:48 AM
To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: New Contact - Confirmations

Jeff hasn't left the group, has he?

	Larry Joe Hunter
	09/29/2000 08:47 AM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: New Contact - Confirmations

To all,

Please remove Jeff Sorenson from your distribution lists for the
Confirmations group.  Please send all Master Agreements, Amendments, and all
else directly to me @ EB3094A.

Thanks,
Joe Hunter


Lots on CA; EPSA's views; and much from some Enron rep named "Sue Marrow."
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 10/31/2000 09:56 AM -----

	US Publishing <season@restructuringtoday.com>
	10/29/2000 06:17 PM
	Please respond to season

		 To: "RT Reader" <season@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today, Monday October 30, 2000

(see attached file:  rt001030.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
www.restructuringtoday.com
season@restructuringtoday.com

 - rt001030.pdf


My comments

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/03/2001 12:37 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments to Gov's Proposals

I've had to spend a little time negotiating this AM with ENA and EES, but I'm
confident that they'll be OK with this version.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 12:40 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/03/2001 12:19 PM

		 To: skean@skytel.com, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Comments to Gov's Proposals

Here they are.  Please review and provide comments quickly.  I'd like to get
this off to Kari ASAP.  Thanks.

Jeff


I would suggest that we bring Bob in once we've had a chance to discuss
internally today.

Best,
Jeff


Ken,

Here is a three page summary of Amory Lovins project at the Rocky
Mountain Institute.  You recall you were going to have someone at Enron
look it over to see if you had any interest in supporting it.  Whoever
gets the task is free to talk with Amory, Kathleen Moazed at the Kirsch
Foundation and the Center for Innovative Policies, or me.

Mick
415-561-7732
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
-----Original Message-----
From: Kathleen Moazed [mailto:kmoazed@propel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:42 AM
To: Mick Seidl
Subject: Amory Lovins summary of energy project

Mr. Seidl --

Attached is the 3 page summary written by Amory.  I will send you the
one-pager we are working on for a Capitol Hill audience when we finalize
it, probably by the end of the day.

Steve's numbers are:
cell:       650.279.1008       (best one to use)
work:   408.571.6317
home:  650.941.0248

Thanks,

Kathleen Moazed
Kathleen Bertelsen Moazed
Executive Director
Center for Innovative Policies
536 Irving Street
San Francisco, CA 94122
tel:   415.682-9192   cell:  415.516.7886
fax: 415.682.9193

 - NEPI august 21.doc


Stacey, I need your help in clearing PMA's for Oasis.  I have a lot of PMA's
for 1999 related to rates missing or incorrect.  Would you help me by passing
the information along to me?

Jan 1999
Mar 1999
Jun 1999
Aug 1999
Sep 1999

The Volume Management group (Rita Wynne's group) wants to have the rates
cleared up by Wednesday next week, which means I will probably need to get
something from you by Monday.  Sorry for the late notice.  Please call me at
x 3-1836 if you have any questions.

Heidi


Oliver North
April 20, 2001
Military illiteracy
Washington, DC -- The April 1 collision between a People's Liberation Air
Force F-8 fighter and a US Navy EP-3 over the South China Sea has revealed a
striking military weakness. As the 11-day standoff over the fate of 24 of our
military personnel detained by the communist Chinese unfolded, the masters of
the media went into high gear to explain to the American people what was
going on. The potentates of the press did an adequate job of reporting on the
political dynamic in our nation's capital; on the diplomatic exchanges
between Beijing and Washington; and on the anxieties of loved ones waiting at
home. But when it came to reporting on the military aspects of the incident,
they failed miserably. Strangely enough, almost no one noticed -- in large
part because the American media and the American people suffer from the same
malady: military illiteracy. Some examples: From the day of the collision
onward, nearly every US media outlet referred repeatedly to the damaged US
aircraft -- a 45-year old, four-engine turbo-prop -- as a "spy-plane." It's
not. A "spy plane" (the U-2 or SR-71, for example) is designed to overfly an
adversary's territory. The sturdy old EP-3 however, is designated as a
"reconnaissance and surveillance" aircraft, and it conducts its mission of
collecting electronic emissions by flying in international airspace or over
"friendly territory." The difference between "surveillance aircraft" and "spy
plane" is not a simple matter of semantics -- it is an important distinction
that affords the EP-3 and its crew protections in international law. Not
unexpectedly, the use of the term "spy plane" in the US media was immediately
picked up by the international press and Communist China's propaganda
machine. A less egregious example of military illiteracy is evident in
listening to what the media call those who serve in the Armed forces. At
various times during the 11 days our 24 military personnel were detained,
network newsreaders referred to them as "soldiers" or "troops," and
occasionally as "intelligence specialists." The cable "news hounds" made
similar errors last October, when terrorists attacked the USS Cole in Yemen
and the masters of the media repeatedly described the sailors killed and
wounded aboard the vessel as "soldiers." It is tempting to ascribe these
inaccuracies to media malevolence, an undercurrent of antipathy toward the US
military. And members of the armed forces can perhaps be forgiven their
paranoia when they are treated to "investigative reports" like CNN's
"Tailwind" broadcast, in which it was falsely alleged that US forces employed
Sarin nerve gas against US "defectors" in Vietnam. But in fact, it appears
that most of the factual errors in today's media coverage of our military
stem less from malice than from ignorance. And that's not just a media
problem -- it's becoming a national predicament. How is it that so many know
so little about military life today that they cannot distinguish between a
"soldier" and a "sailor"? The answer lies in part with the "success" of the
"all volunteer force" -- now in its 26th year. Once we abandoned selective
service -- the draft -- military recruiters were forced to appeal to an
increasingly narrow cross-section of young Americans to fill the ranks. Gone
is the challenge of patriotism and service that had motivated young men from
all walks of life to join the military. Douglas MacArthur's "Duty, honor,
County" was replaced with a bald bounty system. Sheer greed -- cold hard cash
-- became the Pentagon's answer to enlisting those with critical skills
essential to today's increasingly complex and technology-based military. In
1963, when my Naval Academy classmates and I first swore to "support and
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic ..." it was the commander in chief who administered the oath. Many
have found fault with John Kennedy since that day, but not in his appeal that
we should "ask not what our country can do for you, but what you can do for
your country." That sentiment is heard no longer. And the effect is seen not
just in military recruiting shortfalls, but throughout our society. General
James L. Jones, commandant of the Marine Corps, recently noted that, "The
average citizen, even the average congressman, neither knows nor cares about
national security ..." and that "congressmen and senators no longer vie for
seats on the House or Senate Armed Services Committees." He's right. Fewer
than one in 10 new recruits even knows a military veteran, and only four out
of 100 Americans personally know someone in uniform. It should be instructive
that the military hero of the moment, Navy Lt. Shane Osborn, who saved the
lives of his EP-3 crew by successfully piloting his badly damaged aircraft to
a safe landing, says that he was motivated to become a flyer by his high
school football coach, an Air Force veteran. But Osborn's experience is
increasingly rare. Today, many educators, especially those who came of age
during the "Vietnam era," remain hostile to military service and even go so
far as to deny military recruiters access to high schools. George Orwell
wrote, "We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night
to visit violence on those who would do us harm." If we expect to remain safe
in our beds, we would do well to get smart about our armed forces


Mark,
could you add a legal disclaimer to this draft term sheet that reflects the
fact that we have not performed a credit check on the counterparty? Thanks.
FYI, I am also going to prepare a draft term sheet for a physical transaction
which I will ask Harry Collins to review.
--Andrew

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrew Wilson/Corp/Enron on 10/26/2000
01:52 AM ---------------------------

Andrew Wilson
10/23/2000 09:28 AM
To: Tammy L Mulrooney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  Greg Hermans/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sean Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney
Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Battaglia/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher A
Helfrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Sissingh/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tim
McKone/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Draft Term Sheets--Steel Financial Swap ver. 2

Tammy,
After I sent this to you, I received a voice mail message from Mark Taylor
requesting one more change. Mark pointed out that we need to say the first
issue each month, and I  have now made the change. This version has been
approved by legal.
--Andrew


This is to those of you who can make the game tonight.  Please try to get to
the game as early as possible (6:15-6:30) so we can practice a little.

We should have eight pending Luis' friend.

Let me know if anything comes up between now and game time that we prevent
your attendance.


yes dear.....


IVOLUNTEERI
Join The Party!  Enron is hosting a Fiesta party at the Ripley House for
underprivileged children.  We need volunteers to have fun and help entertain
the children, lunch is included.  The event is this Thursday, July 13 from 9
a.m. - 12:30 p.m.  Any time that you have available will be appreciated.  To
sign up, call Rachel Feldt at 713.345.7629.

IHAPPENINGSI
Bowl For The Cure!  Join Enron and the Muscular Dystrophy Association for
their annual Beach Bowl Fund-raiser, July 29 at Funplex.  Can't bowl? That's
ok, you can still help by raising donations.  Everyone participating is
eligible to win great prizes, including airline tickets and hotel
reservations to an exotic location!  Register now by calling Sandy Hoelscher
at 713.345.6006.  For more information, visit http://home.enron.com/cr.

Join Enron Federal Credit Union and the Foundation for Financial Literacy for
the 2nd session of the Financial Wellness Workshop Series on July 13. Topic:
Use It But Don't Abuse It: Credit.  Please reserve your seat as soon as
possible via e-mail to Amanda.Quiller@enron.com.  For a complete listing of
workshops, visit http://home.enron.com/efcu.

The Enron Blood Drive will be on July 20 from 7 a.m. - 4 p.m. in EB-5C2.
Call 713.853.6100 to schedule an appointment now!

Get CPR/First Aid Certified this month!  Learn the lifesaving techniques for
you and your family.  Learn how to perform adult & infant CPR and how to use
an AED (automatic external defibrillator).  July 25, 1:00 - 5:00 p.m.  Cost
is $10.  To register call the Health Center at 713.853.6100.

Weight Watchers @ Work is gearing up for another session.  Cost is $169 for
16 weeks.  Space is limited to the first 60 employees who register via e-mail
to Michelle Kapfer.  Classes are held every Wednesday  at 11:45 a.m.
beginning July 19.  E-mail confirmations for class participants will begin
on  July 17.

Knead a massage?  Try Massage, Body & Soul at the Body Shop.  20% off your
FIRST half hour or one hour massage.  To schedule an appointment call
713.853.3047.

IWORKPERKSI
Don't delay!  Get your PerkCard today!  The PerkCard offers discounts at a
variety of merchants around Houston.  Cost is $20 and all proceeds go back
into community programming.  For more information visit the WorkPerks website
at http://home.enron.com/workperks/programs/.

Sign up your middle-school aged child for Summer of Service, a community
service program that is challenging, rewarding and tons of fun!  Children
develop valuable skills and are recognized for their contributions to the
community.  They also will enjoy  weekly Fun Friday outings to recreational
and cultural events. Cost is $160 for a two-week session.  Locations include:
West Side YMCA  713.467.9622 and South Montgomery County YMCA (The Woodlands)
281.367.9622.  Session dates are: July 3 - 14, July 17 - 28.  For more
information call the YMCA location of your choice.

ISAVE THE DATEI
August 8 - Enron Night at the Astros game.  For more information, click here
http://home.enron.com/cr.


Andy,
Nice to meet you over the ether, and I hope we will have a chance to meet when you are next in NY.  It certainly sounds like the Fortune 500 represent a large market with the characteristics you describe.  I would guess that they are somewhat harder to reach and sell than energy firms that are actively engaged in trading derivative products and do regard risk management as core, whether the system is run internally or accessed as a service.  I think the company will have to learn more about what it takes to sell to both customer segments as it gets started with its sales and marketing efforts, and I'm not sure any of us know enough about the market at this point to have a strongly held point of view.  I would certainly be interested in any information you have seen as to how the market will develop, and in particular what the breakdown of people trading with Enron as between Fortune 500 vs. energy industry players looks like.  Thanks for your thoughts, and this is clearly part of an ongoing dialogue with the company as to how to most effectively design, market and sell its products.
Stewart
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy.Zipper@enron.com [mailto:Andy.Zipper@enron.com ]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 5:51 PM
To: sgross@warburgpincus.com
Subject: RE: Conagra is our newest beta customer!
Stewart,
It is my strong belief that Kiodex will be most successful in marketing to
Fortune 500 corporations. These companies have extremely large portfolios
of derivative products to hedge various financial risks but do not view
running a risk management system internally as core. I am interested in
your thoughts, and how, if you agree, we can influence the company in this
direction.
Andy Zipper
Enron Networks


Rick -- per my voicemail
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:37 AM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	FW: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kingerski, Harry
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Keene, Patrick
Subject:	FW: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

... some recent history.  I had left the message with Rogers Herndon.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keller, James
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Castano, Marianne
Cc:	Kingerski, Harry; Ogenyi, Gloria
Subject:	Re: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

You are correct!  This is not a new issue, but it seems to resurface on a regular basis.  The issue has been pointed out regularly (the first time in connection with the license and regularly thereafter) and each time the business has said not to worry, if they can't cut a deal with New Power they will just pay the $1/MW.  EES has assumed it will pay the $1/MW since day one!

	Jim

Marianne Castano
08/23/2001 08:33 AM
To:	Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Gloria Ogenyi/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:	James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Re: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Harry and Gloria:

Jim Keller and I have indeed dealt with this issue in the past (it actually came up at the time we were applying for our TX marketer license).

 It is my understanding, and Jim, please comment if my information is "stale", that we were going to choose the option set forth in Sec. 39.352(g)(3), which allows us to make a payment into the System Benefit Fund.  This approach was discussed with Dennis Benevides, and then, I believe, with Don Black, and they were OK with our pursuing this course, in lieu of having TNPC provide service to residentials on our behalf.

 Please call me if you have any questions:  814-835-0793.

Marianne

From:	Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/22/2001 04:06 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Marianne - per my voicemail.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ogenyi, Gloria
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Hamb, Edward
Cc:	Blachman, Jeremy; Gahn, Scott; Letke, Eric; Wood, James; Presto, Kevin M.; Curry, Mike; Wagner, Joseph; Misra, Narsimha; Dietrich, Janet; Collins, Patricia; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Ryall, Jean; Shapiro, Richard; Herndon, Rogers; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Ed,

Residential Obligation
Section 39.352(g) of Senate Bill 7 provides that for any REP serving an aggregate load in excess of 300 MW, 5% of the load must consist of residential customers. A REP can fulfil this requirement by:
1. Demonstrating that it directly serves residential load amounting to 5% of its total load
2. That another REP serves the residential load on its behalf, or
3. It pays 1 dollar per MWH of required 5% load into the System Benefit Fund.
 EES can fulfil its obligation by entering into an agreement with New Power to serve residential load on its behalf, or can pay the 1$ per MWH penalty.
There is an annual compliance reporting requirement and EES can demonstrate compliance if it has an agreement with New Power.

EES Contract,
For price to beat customers, the utilities have by Commission rule, the obligation to allow customers to come and go without restraint for the 5 year period conmmencing 1/2/02. The Commission concern may be that Enron will abuse this provision by gaming the system. The Enron contracts as currently written are within the rules as approved by the Commission. Until the utilities move to amend the relevant rules, the Commission can only exercise its displeasure by appropriate oversight and enforcement to determine what conduct amounts to abuse and gaming. I think it will ultimately be a question of degree and pattern of switching. The onus will be on the affiliated REPs to prove abuse and gaming. Fundamentally, it is in the best interest of the market to allow customers to come and go. Customer mobility is the best customer protection in a competitive market. Besides, a restraint on customer mobility could have a chilling effect on competition as it will increase customer inertia. The Commission will carefully weigh any course of action to insure that they achieve a reasonable balance. For larger than 1MW customers, they can agree to long term contracts and a restriction on their ability to come and go.

Please call with any questions,
Gloria
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hamb, Edward
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Ogenyi, Gloria
Subject:	Re: Update: Enron Direct Telesales Initiative in NY, NJ and TX

To:	ehamb@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

get on this.  we need to discuss
---------------------- Forwarded by James M Wood/HOU/EES on 08/22/2001 10:20 AM ---------------------------
From:	Rogers Herndon/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/22/2001 09:27 AM
To:	Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kevin M Presto/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Joseph Wagner/ENRON@enronXgate, Narsimha Misra/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Everyone -

I was just informed by EPMI that there may be a requirement for Retail Energy Providers in ERCOT to serve a certain mix of residential rate class/industrial rate class customers once a certain industrial threshold is crossed (300 Mw of industrial rate class load).

EWS has not set it itself up to monitor such requirements.  Therefore, I cannot comment on the accuracy or details of this requirement.  However, it is something we definitely need to look into.  In addition, we (EPMI/EWS) are getting feedback from the TX PUC that they are not pleased with how they see the pilot and the market structure unfolding.  Specifically, they are not pleased with retail energy providers' contracts that contemplate the right to switch between direct access and tariff (and visa-versa).  We will monitor and need to get more clarity on how the PUC intends to address their displeasure.

On the residential requirement front, someone needs to address this.  Specifically, is this true.  If so, what rate classes are considered industrial vs. commercial?  Is there a similar requirement for commercial load?  Is TI considered industrial?  Do we already have industrial customers in our portfolio?  Who in EES tracks and monitors issues like these as we enter markets?

Mike Curry is in the process of tracking this info down from an EPMI perspective as they are focusing on more of the pure, large industrial customers.  We will share any information Mike receives with the EES group.

RH

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


Diana,

         Can you point out a deal number of which we are talking about and
you have a problem with.
         (maybe between EAST and WEST).

         In general desk-to desk deals don't get scheduled which means there
won't be any
         schedule changes.

          Thanks,
          Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Symes, Kate; Pate, Brett
Subject: RE: Forward Obligation Report

Thanks for the quick response!  So how do we get from today to being able to
capture desk to desk deals with all schedule changes?

Diana

From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/04/2001 01:34 PM CDT
To: Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Brett Pate/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: Forward Obligation Report

    Hi Diana & Kate,

    You are not wasting our time, you make our time valuable. You should be
able to see ver 3.0.0.36 in production and ver 3.0.0.38 in stage,
    if not phone David Poston for support. Ver 3.0.0.38 is newer and includes
insignifficant changes on the form for selection desks, which
    Corry Bentley requested here. They don't allow us to promote now things
like that to production the last five days and the first day of the month.

   Now the report is able to show both the term and schedule (liquidation)
data. The term data are the way the deal was entered with
   Deal Entry, Deal Blotter or EOL bridge, signed and confirmed. The schedule
data should be very much the same with all the changes
   in Deal Scheduling. There is no difference between schedule and
liquidation data, schedule data is a subset of liquidation one in time and
   it is about 2-3 weeks. At the moment the schedule strips for WEST contain
data from 3/22/2001 to 4/5/2001, and the liquidation
   the same data from 4/2/1996.

   Because we don't schedule normally desk-to-desk deals (I think we schedule
between EAST and WEST only) we don't have schedule
   (liquidation) data for desk-to-desk. I hided the check box to avoid
confusions. The option Show Desk is very simple, changes the format
   of the header for Region, nothing else.

   Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:34 PM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Subject: Forward Obligation Report

Kroum,

I was running the new version of the Obligation Report.  I was not included
in the testing phase of the new version and apparently the report is still
not doing what the "fix" was initiated for.  Originally, my discussions with
Doung Luu was for the Obligation report to capture: 1. All deals with any
changes made in Deal Scheduling and  2.  All Desk to Desk deals.  Number
(2),   I believe was the difficult one.  When selecting the option on "Show
Deals"  in order to capture schedule changes you must select "Liquidate".
This does work, but it does not give you the option to select "Show Desk to
Desk", which like I said before, was the intent of the changes.  Please
contact me for further discussion.  I apologize for not participating and
wasting your time.

Sincerely,

Diana Scholtes
(503) 464-3807

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Symes, Kate
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Pate, Brett; Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Forward Obligation Report Question

Good afternoon, IT Wizards -

I'm curious about a feature on the new Forward Obligation Report. It is now
possible to run the report showing term, scheduled, or liquidated deals. In
the past I've always run the report showing term deals, then entered my
desk-to-desk deals from those numbers. Now I believe the report is designed
to pull data from our scheduling database, so I'm wondering what the
difference is between the term deal report and the scheduled deal report.
Each produce completely different numbers! Please let me know when you get a
chance.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


----- Forwarded by Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 11:45 AM -----

	Rosalee Fleming
	04/16/2001 01:37 PM

		 To: Carolyn Cooney/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Presentation

Thanks a million, Carolyn!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 04/16/2001
12:28 PM ---------------------------

Lloyd Will@ECT
04/16/2001 11:46 AM
To: rosalee.fleming@enron.com
cc: Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Presentation

Attached is a general Eastern & Ercot outlook presentation, state of the gas
storage as well as a weekly coal report for Mr. Lay.

Please ensure that he receives this material for his meeting tomorrow.

Thanks.


Paige wrote me at 430 this am, and said that since she was still up at 430,
she probably won't be home in time for Michael's parties.  Should I just
leave him after gymnastics?  I don't really want to come back the office, but
I do want to go to Anne's.  Hmmm.  If Paige is home by 500, everything might
work.


Vince,

Interesting newsletters.

DAd
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2000
08:34 AM ---------------------------

Paula Corey@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
02/15/2000 07:31 AM
To: Anthony Mends/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Weeks/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: FW: Internet Services - Bandwidth trading

---------------------- Forwarded by Paula Corey/Enron Communications on
02/15/2000 07:33 AM ---------------------------

ametz@houston.rr.com on 02/14/2000 07:16:06 PM
Please respond to alaina@alaina.net

To: Paula Corey/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steve Lovett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications

cc:

Subject: FW: Internet Services - Bandwidth trading

See below for an article on EBS...
Alaina

-----Original Message-----
From: NWFusion Focus [mailto:news@caserta.itwpub1.com]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 7:39 PM
To: Alaina Metz
Subject: Internet Services - Bandwidth trading

NETWORK WORLD FUSION FOCUS: DENISE PAPPALARDO on
INTERNET SERVICES
Today's focus: Bandwidth trading
02/14/00

Dear Alaina Metz,

Find out what's new in Access Services and Equipment at Network World's
free event, State of the WAN: Capitalizing on New Technologies and
Services. For complete program information and registration go to
http://www3.nwfusion.com/click;929112;0;0;2;0;?http://nww1.com/go/929112.htm
l

Coming in March -- 7 new Network World e-mail newsletters: Whitepapers
download; Application Service Providers; Product review of the week;
NetWare; Linux; Storage; Security and Bug Alert. Sign up today at
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/newsletters/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~This newsletter sponsored by Cisco Systems~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Cisco Systems is changing the way people live, work, and play with their
world-class technologies. For more information on high tech
opportunities visit our site. Cisco Systems. A better way to work.
Equal opportunity employer.
http://www3.nwfusion.com/click;939609;0;0;2;0;?http://nww1.com/go/939609.htm
l
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Copy and paste URLs that break in two lines and remove extra spaces.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Editor's note: Join Network World's Readers Forum on denial of service
attacks at
http://www.nwfusion.com/cgi-bin/WebX.cgi?forum-230@@.ee6e125

Today's focus: Bandwidth trading
--------------------------------
By Denise Pappalardo

Last week Enron Broadband Services held a press event to talk about the
company's trading of bandwidth.

While bandwidth trading, or intermediation, as Enron's CEO Joseph Hirko
prefers to call it, does not directly affect customers, it's something
they should be aware of.

Enron has developed "pooling points" in Los Angeles and New York, where
Enron and other serv-ice providers buy or sell bandwidth. Carriers
have been leasing capacity from each other for decades and ISPs have
been setting up private peering connections with each other for
several years, so the concept of using each other's bandwidth is not
new.

But Enron has set up a system that's based primarily on Lucent network
management gear, which Enron claims will allow it to do two important
things: Guarantee performance over multiple net-works; and change
circuits in a matter of seconds, as opposed to days or months.

Today, when carriers buy capacity from each other, they ink deals that
sometimes span 20 years. But Enron plans on changing that. The
company's idea is to treat bandwidth as a commodity. Instead of
signing a 20-year deal, the carrier signs up with carrier ABC because
it is offering a competitively low rate on T-3 connections for that
month. But next month carrier XYZ is expected to lower its rates, so
the carrier then switches its circuits from ABC to XYZ.

Enron has the capability to change circuits every five seconds, says Tom
Gros, vice president of global trading at Enron. So the idea is that
carriers are going to be able to get high-quality bandwidth at reduced
rates. Nothing wrong with that idea, but a few questions come up.

One: Will your carrier or ISP share those savings with you, the business
customer? Well, that's hard to say. This is a difficult question to
answer because most Enron's "intermediation" partner deals are
confidential. Global Crossings, a wholesale carrier, is the only deal
that's been announced because it was Enron's first.

So chances are you won't even know if your carrier is working with
Enron, who claims several other carriers are in fact working with
them.

Two: Doesn't constant circuit changes bring up monitoring issues for
business users? Gros says it should not, and in fact end users should
expect even better monitoring capabilities. Now while En-ron very well
might provide its carrier and ISP partners with high-end monitoring
tools, I would take the position that it's highly unlikely that
carriers are going to make those tools available to their cus-tomers.
Why? Well the answer gets back to the first issue. If all of the deals
are confidential, end us-ers aren't going to even know their circuits
are getting switched around.

Would you want to know if your carrier or ISP is participating in
bandwidth trading?

To contact Denise Pappalardo:
-----------------------------
Denise Pappalardo is a senior editor for Network World, covering ISPs,
VPNs and related topics. Reach her at mailto:denisep@nww.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR RELATED LINKS -- Click here for Network World's home page:
http://www.nwfusion.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Enron inks deal with Sun to further broadband Net service, Network
World, 01/21/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2000/0121enron.html

Bandwidth broker opens for business, Network World, 10/18/99
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/1999/1018bandtrade.html

Enron building bandwidth the IP way, Network World, 08/02/99
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/1999/0802carrier.html

Archive of Network World Fusion Focus on Internet Services newsletters:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/isp/

Other ISP-related articles from Network World:

Denise Pappalardo: ASPs to jam with Jamcracker, Network World, 02/14/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/archive/2000/87199_02-14-2000.html

New ASP twist: Mgmt. service providers, Network World, 02/14/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2000/0214cooler.html

Questions or comments?
----------------------
* For editorial comments, write Charley Spektor,
Managing Editor at: cspektor@nww.com
* For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach,
Account Executive at: jkalbach@nww.com
* For all other inquiries, write Christine Rhoder,
Circulation Marketing Manager at: crhoder@nww.com

Subscription Services
---------------------
You can subscribe or unsubscribe to any of your e-mail newsletters by
updating your form at: http://www.nwfusion.com/focus/subscription.html

For subscription changes that cannot be handled via the web, please send
an email to our customer service dept: listnews@gaeta.itwpub1.com

Network World Fusion is part of IDG.net, the IDG Online Network.
IT All Starts Here: http://www.idg.net

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2000


Rod has covered all of the angles. He works closely with corp. insurance
folks;
and from time to time we've entertained the idea of bidding out the service.

Jerry Peters
12/13/2000 11:32 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: John Jesse/NPNG/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Insurance Claims

Actually, I am not sure NPNG currently has a lot of expertise in this area.
I have asked John to evaluate whether corporate should handle NBPL's
insurance needs.  We have Jim Menning, spending about 75% of his time on
insurance so I am hopeful that a move to corporate could reduce our costs -
but obviously eliminating 0.75 FTEs is minor compared to the effect (plus or
minus) of a change in direct insurance premiums or allocated insurance
costs.  Do either of you have experience or information that would support
either side, i.e. directly manage ETS insurance function or outsource it all
to corporate?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron on 12/13/2000
11:25 AM ---------------------------

James Saunders
12/13/2000 08:57 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Insurance Claims

Any chance at  all that we can use Northern Plains/NBPL insurance expertise
to find a solution for ETS increases???


The following 12 applications will go for approval at the next executive
committee meeting on Thursday, November 1.

Please let me know if you know Kommunalbanken AS or KommunKredit.  Thank
you.
Mary

Primary Regional
1.  Hamburger Sparkasse - German bank

Associate Broker
2.  Tradition (North America), Inc. - broker

Associate
3.  LIFFE - exchange
4.  Arendt & Medernach - Luxembourg law firm
5.  Wistrand Advokatbyra - Swedish law firm

Associate Emerging
6.  Deacons - Hong Kong law firm

Subscriber
7.  Kommunalbanken AS - local gov't (Norway) funding agency
8.  KommunKredit - provides loans to the Danish local authorities and Danish
semi-municipal institutions
9.  CDC IXIS Asset Management - (its parent CDC IXIS Capital Markets is a
Primary member)
10.  DKR Capital Inc. - Investment management firm.  (Formerly known as AIG
International Asset  Management Inc.  DKR is no longer an affiliate of AIG.)
11.  Bank of England - Central bank
12.  Swiss National Bank - Central bank


Hi Suzanne,

I haven't seen a revised flight schedule from TAP.  Have they made the change
yet?

Thanks,

Kay


PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL--THIS ACCOUNT IS NOT MONITORED

AP User:

Attached is/are the payment proposal(s) for your business unit.  Please review and forward to your approver(s)/CAO.

Thank you.
SAP AP Team
 - 20020116-DENWC.XLS


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001
05:21 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Spradling <spradlin@rice.edu> on 01/17/2001 10:20:05 AM
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
cc: cmiller@rice.edu, castro@rice.edu, spradlin@rice.edu
Subject: Jones Graduate School Course Descriptions List for 2000 - 2001

Spring 2001 Faculty and Students,

Jones Graduate School Course Descriptions List for 2000 - 2001 has been
posted to EMBANET.  To access the course descriptions please open the JGSM
Area icon on the EMBANET desktop.  Next please open the Announcement JGSM
icon.  You will find the course descriptions located under the Subject
column.  Please open the document.  If you do not have access to EMBANET
you will need to speak with David Kilgore at kilgore@rice.edu or by calling
David at 713-348-5378.

Thanks,
Kathy

Kathy M. Spradling
MBA Program Coordinator
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street, MS 531
Houston, Texas  77005-1892
Phone:  (713) 348-3313
Fax:  (713) 348-5251
Email:  spradlin@rice.edu
http://www.rice.edu/jgs
E-mail:  spradlin@rice.edu
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgs/


<<Department of Energ1.doc>> Mary/Greg:  Attached is a draft of an
agreement to provide ancillary services to support Enron's purchase, and
transmission over the Federal system, of output from the Grays Harbor Paper
generator.  Please review and provide any comments to me sometime this week.
Thanks.

Al Paschke
(360) 418-8283

 - Department of Energ1.doc


i bought another tahoe fri.  it is red with tan interior.  looks great.


Rick:   Jim said that you were asking about this deal.   I'm forwarding the
information that I provided to you last week (in hard copy), FYI.    Let me
know if you have any questions.

Lisa
----- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 08:37 AM -----

	Kim Stanley/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/30/2001 05:52 PM

		 To: Steel Distribution@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Huntco Q&A - For internal distribution only

Attached is a list of anticipated questions you may receive regarding the
announcement of the Huntco inventory managment transaction and the cold mill
acquisition. Please review prior to responding to external questions.
Further, if you notice that a particular topic regarding the transaction is
not listed in the attached document, please contact Jennifer Walker or Kim
Stanley immediately.
Thanks,
Kim


You will probably have to reschedule this because Pre-Bid meeting is the same
bat time.

	From:  Yvette G Connevey @ ENRON                           02/15/2000 09:23 AM

To: Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transport / Producer Services meeting RESCHEDULED

This meeting has changed dates ONLY.  Please plan to attend on Tuesday,
February 22nd from 4 -5 in Conference Room 37C1.

Thank You!
Yvette
x3.5953

---------------------- Forwarded by Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron on
02/15/2000 09:21 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Yvette G Connevey                           02/14/2000 03:29 PM

To: Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Transport / Producer Services meeting

Please plan to attend a meeting with Brenda Herod tomorrow at 4:00 pm in
Conference Room 37C1 regarding Transport and Producer Services issues.

If you have any questions or conflicts, please call.

Thank You!
Yvette
x3.5953


RAYMOND,MAUREEN J  has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your
approval.  You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP
at http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.  Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on RAYMOND,MAUREEN J  until you have
approved the list.