Ok - thanks.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: "Mike Curran" <mcurran@quantinleap.com>
Cc: <Stinson.Gibner@enron.com>; <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: Willow and Pathstar evaluations

>
> Mike,
>
> We are short manpower in London. We shall try to
> evaluate the software in Houston.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> "Mike Curran" <mcurran@quantinleap.com> on 04/24/2001 10:03:24 AM
>
> Please respond to "Mike Curran" <mcurran@quantinleap.com>
>
> To:   <vkamins@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Willow and Pathstar evaluations
>
>
>
> Hi Vince -
>
> Hope all is well with you.
>
> Sharad hasn't had time to evaluate our Willow Tree or Monte Carlo software
> since the middle of last year.  Is there somebody else that could do it?
>
> Please let me know who I should send the evaluation to.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Michael Curran
> CEO
> Quantin' Leap Limited
> Piercy House
> 7 Copthall Avenue
> London EC2R 7NJ
>
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7562 3450
> Fax: +44 (0)20 7562 3411
>
> mailto:mcurran@quantinleap.com
>
> http://www.quantinleap.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Gary/Richard,

FYI, I'm forwarding an email from Chris Anderson at the California Power
Exchange re. our current CORE and CTS market expsosure.  I haven't reviewed
this entirely yet, but will do so shortly.  Please call to discuss should you
have any questions.

Regards,
Tracy
503-464-8755

---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT on 02/05/2001 06:47 PM
---------------------------

<Chris_A_Anderson@calpx.com> on 02/05/2001 06:35:31 PM
To: tracy.ngo@enron.com
cc: bwhitwell@we-law.com, Lisa_G_Urick@calpx.com

Subject: Enron Credit Exposure

Tracy,

Per your request, here is a worksheet summarizing EPMI's margin requirement
and
collateral deposit since last Thursday.

Regards,

Chris Anderson
626-537-3377

(See attached file: Enron -  credit explosure .xls)

 - Enron -  credit explosure .xls


Fran - It looks like you either made changes or added legs to this deal
today. Do they need to reconfirm this? Please let me know.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/08/2001 03:14 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/08/2001 03:13 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 412868

Can you find out if we are supposed to confirm the legs of this City of
Roseville deal that were input today.  And what it is exactly that they are
doing with these legs.

Thanks!


-----Original Message-----
From: postmaster@powersrc.com [mailto:postmaster@powersrc.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Lawrence.Clayton@constellation.com
Subject: Delivery failure ()

Your message has encountered delivery problems
to the following recipient(s):

joe.steponovitch@enron.com
Delivery failed
550 5.1.1 <joe.steponovitch@enron.com>... User unknown

No recipients were successfully delivered to.

 - ATT337726.TXT
Message-ID: <BA28C4F43699D311ABC300508B10DC9204140208@ex-cndlr-m01.gsp.gs.com>
From: "Clayton III, Lawrence" <Lawrence.Clayton@constellation.com>
To: "'joe.steponovitch@enron.com'" <joe.steponovitch@enron.com>
Subject: FW: First Call - Adrian
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:33:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;	boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C179BC.E237E110"

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Clark [mailto:AClark@firstcallassociates.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:12 PM
To: lawrence.clayton@constellation.com
Subject: First Call - Adrian

Lawrence,

I enjoyed speaking with you today and was happy to hear things are good for
you.  Here is my contact information as discussed, let me know if you know
of any good Enron people that may be worth talking to.  Take care.

Adrian Clark
Director
First Call Associates, Inc.
8 Andrew Dr.
Canton, CT  06019
(860)693-4122
(860)693-4118 (fax)

From: Adrian Clark <AClark@firstcallassociates.com>
To: AClark@firstcallassociates.com
Subject: Adrian Clark
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:15:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain

Executive recruiter in the energy and telecommunications industries.


we'll try to get a copy of gary's comments
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 08:59 AM -----

	Maureen McVicker
	12/04/2000 08:48 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: See Jeff Skilling's CNBC interview on IPTV

FYI -

----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 08:48 AM -----

	Gary Hamel <ghamel@strategos.com>
	12/02/2000 06:27 AM
	Please respond to ghamel

		 To: Maureen.McVicker@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: See Jeff Skilling's CNBC interview on IPTV

You might be interested to know that I gave Enron a big plug last week when I
served as guest host on the evening
European news roundup broadcast from CNBC's London studios.

Gary.

Maureen.McVicker@enron.com wrote:

> >From Maureen McVicker (Steve Kean's Assistant)
>
> If you have any questions, please call me at 713-853-1808.
>
> ----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 12/01/2000 04:32 PM -----
>
>                     Public
>                     Relations            To:     All Enron Worldwide
>                     Sent by:             cc:
>                     Public               Subject:     See Jeff Skilling's
CNBC interview
>                     Relations            on IPTV
>
>
>                     12/01/2000
>                     03:19 PM
>
>
>
> (Embedded image moved to file: pic26924.pcx)        Public Relations
>
> Did you miss Jeff on CNBC "Street Signs" yesterday?  Not to worry.  Your
> ever benevolent communications team has arranged for Jeff's interview to be
> played on an IPTV webcast.  Just point your browser to
> http://iptv.enron.com, click the link for special events, and then choose
> "Skilling CNBC."  The interview will be available every ten minutes through
> Wednesday, Dec. 6.
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                    Name: pic26924.pcx
>    pic26924.pcx    Type: Corel PHOTO-PAINT 6.0 Image
(application/x-unknown-content-type-CorelPhotoPaint.Image.6)
>                Encoding: base64


Yes.  Mary will discuss with you.

Michelle Cash @ ECT   05/24/2001 04:35 PM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Joyce/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Re: Conversation with Wanda Curry

Did we offer her a contract in any of the scenarios?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.

	Steven J Kean@ENRON
	05/23/2001 06:40 PM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Joyce/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Conversation with Wanda Curry

Today, Mary Joyce and I met with Wanda Curry.  I realize that there is some
concern that Wanda is a litigation threat, so for the purposes of soliciting
legal advice and in anticipation of litigation, I am forwarding my
recollection of today's meeting to you:

Wanda remains very emotional about what she perceives as "unfair and
discriminatory" treatment.  When I asked her what she meant specifically (and
did she intend those terms to have their legal meaning), she said that she
did not intend the legal meaning of those terms;  rather, she, on  a
"personal" level,  felt that the company should have treated her better.  She
mentioned specifically: that no one ever called to explain in detail why she
had not been further promoted at Enron or given more responsibility at Enron,
that she viewed the job in Sally Beck's organization as unsatisfactory
(because Sally should be treated as a peer, not a superior), and that she
felt as though she did not have the support of upper management of the
company.
I described several options for her:
Take the job she was offered in Sally Beck's organization;
Take the job in Rick Buy's organization (I said I would have to talk to Rick
again)
Take severence under the standard package;
Take severence as a "business reorg" but consult with Enron for a period.
At first she seemed most interested in the fourth option (although she wasn't
particularly happy about any of the  alternatives), but at the end of the
discussion expressed interest in the second option.
A large part of the conversation involved discussion of Wanda's complaints
about how she had been treated.  Most of Wanda's concerns focussed on jobs
she did not get, or jobs she felt were taken from her, reduced scope of
control, and the fact that she felt that her supervisors did not communicate
with her sufficiently prior to or subsequent to making their decisions about
job assignments.  I suggested that there were likely two sides to the story
and that most of the problem was insufficient communication or perhaps some
insensitivity.  I also pointed out that in all my conversations I heard good
things about her performance and had no indication that anyone had treated
her unfairly.
Wanda did complain about many things, but never once complained about her pay
at Enron.

Mary, these are my recollections from today.  Do you have anything to add?


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2001 08:47 AM -----

	Carlos Alatorre/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/15/2001 06:24 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Harry Arora/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert Stalford/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Examples of Power Long Descriptions

Elizabeth:
Below you can find examples of Long Descriptions for Phy Power.
Please let me know if you have any questions/comments
Thanks
Carlos

US Pwr Phy Firm  PJM-W Peak              Jul01           USD/MWh
A US Power Transaction with Enron Power Marketing, Inc., under which the
Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall purchase a quantity of firm energy
equal to the Hourly Quantity at the Contract Price. The Contract Price shall
be as submitted by the Counterparty via the Website.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for delivery or receipt of energy at the PJM Western Hub.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours
(MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable
hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').
The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning
with the hour ending 0800 (7:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2300
(11:00 pm) Eastern Prevailing Time.  "Delivery Day" means a day during the
term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or
Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.

US Pwr Phy Firm  PJM-W Peak              Jan-Dec03       USD/MWh
A US Power Transaction with Enron Power Marketing, Inc., under which the
Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall purchase a quantity of firm energy
equal to the Hourly Quantity at the Contract Price. The Contract Price shall
be as submitted by the Counterparty via the Website.
The transaction is for the applicable hours as set forth herein on each
Delivery Day for the Effective Date 01 Jan 2003 to the Termination Date 31
Dec 2003.
The transaction is for delivery or receipt of energy at the PJM Western Hub.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours
(MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable
hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').
The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning
with the hour ending 0800 (7:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2300
(11:00 pm) Eastern Prevailing Time.  "Delivery Day" means a day during the
term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or
Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.

US Pwr Phy Index PJM-W MWD Peak          Jun01           USD/MWh
A US Power Transaction with Enron Power Marketing, Inc., under which the
Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall purchase a quantity for firm energy
equal to the Hourly Quantity at the Contract Price.  The Contract Price shall
be the Floating Price, as adjusted by the price submitted by the Counterparty
via the Website.  The period of time during which the Floating Price is
derived (a "Determination Period") shall be a calendar month during the term
of the Transaction; provided that, if the term of the Transaction is less
than one month, such Determination Period shall be the term of the
Transaction.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for delivery or receipt of energy at the PJM Western Hub.
The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the
daily prices listed in the Index for power delivered during Peak hours on
each Delivery Day during the applicable Determination Period.  The Floating
Price for each Determination Period shall be calculated utilizing the daily
prices published in Megawatt Daily's Market Report under the headings "Trades
for Standard 16-Hour Daily Products;Weighted Average Index; PJM-West"  (the
"Index").
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours
(MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable
hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').
The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning
with the hour ending 0800 (7:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2300
(11:00 pm) Eastern Prevailing Time.  "Delivery Day" means a day during the
term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or
Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.


We need to send today BUT we need an immediate cover letter (itemizing every
step to be taken) and sample resolution format to email to the counterparty
and lawyer.  I'll review the letter.  I have an 11 am meeting but should be
back in an hour.

Let me know if you have questions.  Sara


It did but TETCO prorated the flow between the two parties (Dynegy and ENA)

Thanks

Daren J Farmer
12/21/2000 10:42 AM
To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Enerfin meter 980439 for 10/00

Didn't the deal that Victor extended cover these days?  I don't think
anything should be adjusted on the Dynegy deal.

D

Jackie Young
12/19/2000 08:47 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enerfin meter 980439 for 10/00

Daren can you please extend Deal #422516 to cover flow  of 9 dec. for
10/6/2000 and extend deal 432556 to cover flow of 44 dec. for 10/19/2000?

Volume Mgmt is trying to clear up these issues.

Thanks
-Jackie-

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           12/15/2000 11:52 AM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enerfin meter 980439 for 10/00

Jackie, Talk to Darren about this. The deal you reference is an HPL deal with
Dynegy and I don't have access to it. I'm on the East desk. Yesterday I
extended the deal 421415 for the 6th and 19th and Meredith inserted a path in
Unify - TETCO  to cover the small overflow volume between HPL and ENA. The
ENA/HPL piece is done. The piece between HPL and Dynegy is what you need
inserted.THANKS

Jackie Young
12/15/2000 11:32 AM
To: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enerfin meter 980439 for 10/00

Sherlyn, I've placed the correct volumes for days 6 and 9 for ENA.  I'll have
the deal extended for Dynegy and let you know when it's done.

Victor, can you extend the deal 422516 for days 6 and 9 please?  Thanks.  Oh
and by the way, I had mistaken you for someone else when I sent you the
e-mail on yesterday.  Sorry.  I thought that I knew you.  Anyway, please
advise when you've extended the deal so that Sherlyn can create an accounting
arrangement.

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enerfin meter 980439 for 10/00

I don't want to tell you to add any contracts, because I am not sure about
that.   I am just saying if you look at Ray's schedule there are 2 deals out
there, one is a purchase from ENA and the other a purchase from Dynegy.  The
track id I gave you was for ENA.   You  cannot allocate the Dynegy piece
until I give you a track id.   I cannot give you a track id until the deal is
extended for days 10/6 and 10/19.

Jackie Young
12/15/2000 10:51 AM
To: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Enerfin meter 980439 for 10/00

Arre you saying that for both days that two (2) ENA contracts should be
placed at the meter for days 6 and 19 and then allocating half of the the
total volume to each contract?

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enerfin meter 980439 for 10/00

Jackie,
You did not allocate this according to Ray's schedule.  The track id I gave
you was only for the purchase from ENA.   You need to extend the deal for the
purchase from Dynegy.   You put all of the volume on these 2 days on ENA,
that is not what is on Ray's schedule, so we are still out on the
interconnect report.

Jackie Young
12/15/2000 10:30 AM
To: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alfonso Trabulsi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregg
Lenart/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enerfin meter 980439 for 10/00

Accounting arrangement has been placed.  Meter has been reallocated.

Thanks and let me know if you need anything else.

-Jackie-
3-9497

	From:  Sherlyn Schumack                           12/15/2000 10:00 AM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alfonso Trabulsi/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregg Lenart/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Enerfin meter 980439 for 10/00

Jackie,

Your allocation is correct with the exception of days 10/6 and 10/19 where
strangers gas is allocated.    I have created an accounting arrangement for
these days and the new track id for ENA is 240384.  Please allocate the ENA
portion according to Rays schedule for these 2 days.    Deal 422516 (Purchase
from Dynegy) needs to be extended for these 2 days so I can do an accounting
arrangement.   Alfonso  I need for you to allocate your meter daily, because
we have tiered pricing this month.

Thanks.


An interesting piece. j


Louise:

We will receive the $2 million when AES and TVA execute an interconnection agreement for AES' Haywood project. While it is possible that this agreement will be executed this month (50%), it's equally as likely that it will happen Q4. AES is currently under construction on their Haywood project, and as such, they need to get this agreement wrapped up ASAP. Our role in this is to utilize our resources (primarily our consultant who is a former TVA Director) to help AES through the process (and in doing so, we will receive our upside payment of $2 million). We are doing everything we can to reach this milestone in Q3.

We can talk about this before our conference call if you like.

Regards,

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From:	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tue 9/4/2001 9:36 AM
To:	Jacoby, Ben
Cc:
Subject:	AES $2mm

I am assuming we'll get this money booked this month - I am concerned over Fred's comment from the meeting last week.  We need it.  Let me know

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


There will be a demonstration of the Online Trading Application for trading
lawyers and paralegals on Wednesday at 11:00 am in EB2601a.

This project continues to be highly confidential.


any thoughts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
09:15 AM ---------------------------

Mike McConnell
10/30/2000 07:04 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: forwarded resume per your request of Chris Hunt

Another one.  Any ideas?  Coal in Asia?
m
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
07:09 PM ---------------------------

Steve Jernigan@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/18/2000 03:19 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: forwarded resume per your request of Chris Hunt

Mike -

Attached is my resume for your consideration.  I would very much enjoy
exploring any sort of commercial opportunities within your group.  Please
call me with any questions.  Look forward to speaking with you.

Thanks,

Steve


Below are driving instructions to Sara Shackleton's residence for Marie
Heard's party on Friday, June 9, 2000, from 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.  If you
have any questions or need additional information, please call me at x37340.
Thanks, Suzanne

Driving Directions To Sara,s From The Enron Building
(West University Area):

Take  US 59 South

Exit Weslayan

Turn left on Weslayan and go to Coleridge (4 blocks past Bissonnet [Randalls
on the corner of Bissonnet ])

Turn left on Coleridge

House is beige stucco on the right hand side of the street in the middle of
the block

3915 Coleridge
(713) 664-3207


I have attached a list of trade counterparties that have contacted us this week.  The only ones currently threatening to shut down trading are Koch and Koch-Entergy.  I will keep you apprised of changes.

Bill


With mixed emotions, we must bid farewell to our beloved Pat Radford.  She is
relocating to a different position within Enron.
To congratulate her on her new position, to wish her well and to show her our
sincere appreciation for her outstanding, dedicated performance over the past
several years,   we will be holding a surprise breakfast, tomorrow morning.
The info is as follows:

Location:  EB38C2
Time:  9 am
Breakfast Provided

Remember, it's a secret!

Regards,
BNG


Carol:

I am not going to be able to finalize the agreement today because I have to
go to another meeting.

Please look for the final agreement first thing tomorrow morning.  Please
confirm that it is final with you after you receive it tomorrow morning.

Very truly yours,

BILLY
Billy D. Dixon
Attorney
BP America Inc.
501 Westlake Park Blvd., Rm 16.166
Houston, Texas 77079
Direct 281/366-4745
Fax 281/366-5901
billy.dixon@bp.com

***IMPORTANT -- THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS HERETO ARE ATTORNEY-CLIENT
AND/OR ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.  If you have
received this email in error, do not under any circumstances read, forward,
copy, disseminate or save this email or any of its attachments.  If you have
received this email in error, take the following actions: (1) reply to this
email indicating that you received this email in error, and (2) delete and
completely erase this email and its attachments from your computer and any
backup systems or "Deleted Items" folders.

-----Original Message-----
From: Heard, Marie [mailto:Marie.Heard@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:44 AM
To: Dixon, Billy D
Cc: St. Clair, Carol; Jones, Tana
Subject: BP Master Netting Agreement

Mr. Dixon:

Pursuant to Carol St. Clair's request, I am attaching our preliminary
list of the agreements to be under the BP Master Netting Agreement.
Since we don't own 100% of EOTT, any master netting agreement involving
EOTT will not be under this master netting agreement.

Please let us know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com

				 <<BP Master Netting Agreement File
Index.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


The TX MONTHLY story.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	wms <wms@kainon.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 5:28 PM
To:	'jsteffe@enron.com'
Subject:	Enron in Texas Monthly too

 <<Enron Blew It - 11-01.doc>>
I just opened my Texas Monthly, only to find more Enron news.

Did you see it?  The article entitled
"HOW ENRON BLEW IT"
Enron's Cutthroat Culture (on the cover)
Texas Monthly, November 2001 By Mimi Swartz

For Houston's sake as the Energy Capital, we hope the best for Enron as it
turns this thing around.
Attached is the article and below is the link and an excerpt.

If you have any comments on the article, we always like to hear them.

Best, Mark
W. Mark Shirley, CPA
281.374.6700x230
www.kainon.com

http://www.texasmonthly.com/mag/issues/authors/mimiswartz.php

INTRO EXCERPT
The Houston-based energy giant put the pursuit of profits ahead of all other
corporate goals, which fostered a climate of workaholism and paranoia.  And
that was only part of the problem.  (from the table of contents).

Less than a year ago, the Houston-based energy behemoth had everything:
money, power, glitz, smarts, new ideas, and a CEO who wanted to make it the
most important company in the world. Now its stock is down, Wall Street is
bearish, and the CEO is gone. What went wrong?

"It ain't what you don't know that gets you in trouble; it's what you know
for sure that ain't so."       -Mark Twain

K   A   I   N   O   N      G   R   O   U   P
Consulting  +  Staffing  +  Recruiting

 - Enron Blew It - 11-01.doc


Richard Shapiro
	02/21/2001 04:53 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: California

Please forward to entire group:  these are materials recently developed re:
California.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 02/21/2001
04:52 PM ---------------------------

Janel Guerrero
02/08/2001 09:47 AM
To: aameece@quinngillespie.com, dlugar@quinngillespie.com
cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: one-pagers FINAL

Dave and Ashley:  attached are the final version of the one-pagers.  One of
the one-pagers is running onto the second page and I think I deleted out one
of the block headings as well.  Would you mind doing "clean-up" on the
graphics?  Once clean-up is finished, we're good to go.  Thank you !!  Call
if you have questions.


Mark - Thanks for getting me on the chart.  Per our previous conversation,
you don't need to put me in the box at the top if it creates any sort of
political problems at all.  I would be happy just learning the job.   My
concern is that I have a permanent home and the I get a chance to learn what
I consider to be one of the more crucial activities done in the company.
Also, I've already talked to Mariella Mahan about the sale/monetization of
the Caribbean assets and discussed counsel a bit.  I am looking forward to
getting those activities going at the beginning of the year.  Thanks again.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 12:09 PM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia; Giron, Darron C.
Cc:	Lim, Francis S.
Subject:	RE: Additional Book to Move

the book is ENA-FT-WT-SOCAL.  Answer to question 2 & 3 - yes
Commodity code NG
Move deals as of 1/1/02
Do not understand question number 6 - other side should remain counter party
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cheung, Cecilia
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 10:51 AM
To:	Giron, Darron C.
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.; Lim, Francis S.
Subject:	RE: Additional Book to Move

Darron,

Please confirm the following:
1. I can't find the book ENA-WT-SOCAL in Estate database (please provide the CP ID)
2. Move active Financial Deals from NG-PRICE (CP ID 11360)
3. Move active Financial Deals from NG-PR-OPT (CP ID 92649)
4. Commodity code: NG or NGGJ?
5. Please provide the cutoff date to determine active deals (e.g. instr_end_dt > ? 1-jan-2002?)
6. Use ENA CP ID 1305 as the other side counterparty?

If I can have all the answers soon then I think the deals move can be completed around 3:00p.m.

Thanks,
Cecilia
x53362

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 8:55 AM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	Additional Book to Move

Cecilia,
In addition to moving the deals detailed in my previous email, please move only financial deals with the same counterparties from NG-PR-OPT to ENA-WT-SOCAL.  I realize it's a big list, but how long will the entire process take?  If you have any questions, please let me know.  Thanks.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 3:56 PM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	More Counterparties

Attached is a long list of counterparty names to move from NG-PRICE into ENA-WT-SOCAL.  Please move only financial deals only.  Please let me know when this is complete.  Thanks.

DG

 << File: PositiveMTMCounterparties.xls >>


Although I am certain that everyone found the memo regarding the February
23-24th meetings in Washington fascinating re-reading, it was decided that
something more topical and relevant should be provided.  Please see the
attached.


EES seems to want to go to court on the PX Credit -- I believe we need to follow the tariff FIRST.  That involves going to the utilities and then to the CPUC if we can't work it out. If we don't do that first, the court will throw us out and make us do than anyway-- and WHY make that play -- it just raises everyone's temperature and gets them into fighting mode right off the start. Jeanne Bennett agrees with this but Laboeuf is giving EES this recommendation.


Hi Bev,

Here's my work email (kay.mann@enron.com). My home email is kay.mann@worldnet.att.net.
Neil's work email is nmann@erac.com. Moms email is rmccall@airmail.net.

That's all the email addresses I can think of now.

See you soon,

Kay
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


I have attached a copy of the Drypers Conditional swap that we did not
exercise. They misunderstood the trade. They say they did not realize it was
conditional. The person who worked on the deal for Drypers is no longer there.


Notice No. 01-26
January 19, 2001

TO:        ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS
FROM:     Neal Wolkoff
          Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:     MARGIN RATE CHANGE: FEBRUARY, MARCH, AND APRIL 2001 CONTRACTS
ONLY

Effective Date:    Friday, January 19, 2001 (1:00 p.m.).

Futures Contract:  Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures.

Contract Months: February, March, and April 2001 Contracts Only.

Rate Change:
NYMEX Division Margins for the February and March 2001
Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contracts Only

Effective Date:    Friday, January 19, 2001 (1:00 p.m.)

Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):            Old:  $14,000  New:  $12,000

Member Customer (Initial Margin):                Old:  $15,400  New:  $13,200

Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):            Old:  $18,900  New:  $16,200

NYMEX Division Margins for the April 2001
Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract Only

Effective Date:    Friday, January 19, 2001 (1:00 p.m.)

Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):            Old:  $5,000   New:  $6,000

Member Customer (Initial Margin):                Old:  $5,500   New:  $6,600

Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):            Old:  $6,750   New:  $8,100
 Current systems calculate the margin requirement for spread positions by
first determining the "Scan Risk" and then multiplying the number of spreads
by a rate set by the Exchange.  Scan Risk is determined by netting the
outright margin required for each leg of a spread.  Note the outright margin
level required for the February and March 2001 contracts, the April 2001
contract, and all subsequent contracts differ.  Spreading between differently
margined contracts results in a higher spread margin than between equally
margined contracts.  Below are provided three spread scenarios where the legs
of the spread are margined differently.

Scenario One
A spread consisting of one leg in either the February 2001 or March 2001
contracts and another in the April 2001 contract will have its requirement
(at the clearing member rates) calculated at $8,500 starting on Friday,
January 19, 2001.

Example at Clearing Member Rates
One Long February 2001 or March 2001 NG    (1 x $12,000)   =        $12,000
One Short April 2001 NG                 (1 x $6,000)    =   -     $  6,000
Net Scan Risk                         ($12,000-$6,000) =        $  6,000
Spread Rate                          (1x $2,500)     =   +     $  2,500
Total Requirement                                 =        $  8,500

Scenario Two

A spread consisting of one leg in either the February 2001 or March 2001
contracts and another in any month following the April 2001 contract will
have its requirement (at the clearing member rates) calculated at $9,500
starting on
Friday, January 19, 2001.

Example at Clearing Member Rates
One Long February 2001 or March 2001 NG    (1 x $12,000)   =        $12,000
One Short May 2001 - January 2004 NG       (1 x $5,000)    =   -     $  5,000
Net Scan Risk                         ($12,000-$5,000) =        $  7,000
Spread Rate                          (1x $2,500)     =   +     $  2,500
Total Requirement                                 =        $  9,500

Scenario Three

A spread consisting of one leg in the April 2001 contract and another in any
month following the April 2001 contract will have its requirement (at the
clearing member rates) calculated at $3,500 starting on Friday, January 19,
2001.

Example at Clearing Member Rates

One Long April 2001 NG          (1 x $6,000)    =        $  6,000
One Short May 2001 - January 2004 NG       (1 x $5,000)    =   -     $  5,000
Net Scan Risk                         ($6,000-$5,000)  =        $  1,000
Spread Rate                          (1x $2,500)     =   +     $  2,500
Total Requirement                                 =        $  3,500

Summary of NYMEX Division Margins on Natural Gas Futures Spreads
Scenario One: February or March 2001 Contracts versus the April 2001 Contract
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):               $  8,500
Member Customer (Initial Margin):                   $  9,350
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):               $11,475
Scenario Two: February or March 2001 Contracts versus Contracts following the
April 2001 Contract
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):               $  9,500
Member Customer (Initial Margin):                   $10,450
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):               $12,825
Scenario Three: April 2001 Contract versus Contracts following the April 2001
Contract
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin):               $  3,500
Member Customer (Initial Margin):                   $  3,850
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin):               $  4,725
Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855.  This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-26)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Resending - Credit Worksheet and Threshold table.

Credit Worksheet

Threshold Table


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Mulligan, Amy
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:00 PM
To:	Giambrone, Laura; Hernandez, Bert; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Minter, Tracy; Mulligan, Amy; Ward, Linda
Subject:	FW: Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Friday Aug. 17, HE 8:00 AM to Saturday Aug. 18, HE 7:00 AM

----------
From: 	"Kenneth G Gruhl" <kggruhl@duke-energy.com>@ENRON[SMTP:IMCEANOTES-+22KENNETH+20G+20GRUHL+22+20+3CKGGRUHL+40DUKE-ENERGY+2ECOM+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.COM]
Sent: 	Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:55:03 PM
To: 	Mulligan, Amy; Allen K Nielsen; blreese@duke-energy.com; Beck Mayberry; wralkema@pplmt.com; Christopher S Smart; dacluff@duke-energy.com; dlsmith@pplweb.com; dtedesco@duke-energy.com; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Darren Stephens; David Bowers; David P Pell; George X Ouzounian; jjbischoff@pplweb.com; jmtaggart@duke-energy.com; jpritchard@citlink.net; James Stebbins; kglenny@duke-energy.com; Kim White; mschneider@duke-energy.com; Michael Kerr; Michael Wells; rjnewson@duke-energy.com; rspear@pplmt.com; Sherry Davis; Steven Fliflet; Steven Fliflet; tedmayes@aol.com; Ted Romo; Todd Hendricks; Tom Carlson; Tyler J Kristensen; ajreiter@duke-energy.com; kggruhl@duke-energy.com; pattersondw@bv.com; swansondj@bv.com
Subject: 	Griffith Gas & Electric Estimate - Friday Aug. 17, HE 8:00 AM to Saturday Aug. 18, HE 7:00 AM
Auto forwarded by a Rule

Test Schedule as follows:
1) Stable Operation at Minimum load:     HE 7:00 to HE 10:00
2) Stable Operation at Base Load:  HE 13:00 to HE 15:00
3) Steam Turbine Trip:             HE 19:00
4) Plant Shutdown             HE 19:00

Note: DETM can call for more or less MW throughout the day between tests as
needed.

The plant shutdown will last for approximately 3 days. The scope of work is
a subset of the previous planned outage worklist.   Another plant shutdown
will be required later to remove Steam Turbine strainers and to complete
the other outage list tasks.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic02082.pcx)
 - pic02082.pcx


Kate-
Can you verify with Mark that there were two identical trades done on Jan 8,
2001

Enron Sells Southern California Edison
100 mws
sp-15
165.00
jan 10-31, 2001

We received an executed confirmation letter from the cp but the deal number
is not avaliable (the fax machine cut off the deal number)  {just collecting
all the confirms for the California situation.}

the deal numbers I have located are 492137.01, 492152.01
Just making sure  one is not a duplicate.
Thanks


2-5, so much for the nice machine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Baumbach, David
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:55 AM
To:	Bass, Eric; Ames, Chuck; 'Bucalo, Harry'; Bucalo, Harry; Hull, Bryan; Jason Bass (E-mail); Lenhart, Matthew; Love, Phillip M.; Mathews, Reagan; Mills, Bruce; Rabon, Chance; Winfree, O'Neal D.
Subject:	RE: League Dues

From the way it is looking now ... I gave my money away anyway.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Ames, Chuck; Baumbach, David; Bucalo, Harry; Bucalo, Harry; Hull, Bryan; Jason Bass (E-mail); Lenhart, Matthew; Love, Phillip M.; Mathews, Reagan; Mills, Bruce; Rabon, Chance; Winfree, O'Neal D.
Subject:	League Dues

I have some good news and some bad news.  The good news is that I invested all of the league dues in the stock market over the last few weeks.  The bad news is that I invested it in enron stock.  So, needless to say I am going to have to default on this year's payouts.

Sorry guys


I was able to retrieve his resume. Please print out a hard copy for your
files.


Please review the attached outage report. (Revised through December 2002).

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923


i am open to any of your wonderful ideas.  new orleans..1..2...out

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:01 PM
To: epao@mba2002.hbs.edu
Subject: Re: Defense

maine impossible to get to ..    next idea?


Hi Guys,

I'm sending this to you as an FYI because your names were on the deals I had
to fix.  We have two transmission deals with Snohomish PUD (see 469770.1 and
469791.1) that were entered under the Snohomissup counterparty.  When
searching for the counterparty in the listing, please be extra careful about
the one you actually choose.  If the wrong counterparty is added (even if
it's the same customer, just a different moniker, as in this case), it will
send someone (usually me or Virginia) on an unnecessary wild goose chase.

Not hollering, just asking you to be careful.

Caroline


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99
04:31 PM ---------------------------

VKaminski@aol.com on 10/03/99 04:25:26 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Audit

Thanks for your message regarding the Model Risk project. I think it's a very
important issue and really critical to Enron. The model risk represents a
very significant exposure to the company: a wrong model results in bad
decisions and eventually leads to accounting errors and incorrect financial
statements.

Here are my comments.

1. Reasons of model risk. The main source of model risk in Enron is omitted
in your list. I think it's due to the fact that the responsibility for the
final model approval and validation is dispersed in the organization and
there no single unit/person that is vested with the authority to audit,
approve  and monitor valuation models. The popular perception is that this is
done by the Research Group, but this could not be further form the truth.
Given the way the organization evolved over the last few years, we became a
group of internal consultants, working on highly specialized, partial
problems (sometimes, we work on a project from A to Z, but it's an exception
to the rule).

It's imperative that this is communicated to the senior management in a
precise, non-ambiguous way. I think that this is the main source of potential
problems and the first shortcoming of the modeling process to be corrected.

2. I would expand point 3 in your draft (inappropriate application of models)
and add two lower level points: a) wrong inputs b) incorrect model used for a
given transaction. TVA is an example of point a: a transaction in case of
which the inputs have not been being updated for an extended period of time
in the past.

3. Under Control Strength you can mention that several audits of the Research
Group model by Arthur Andersen and Darrell Duffie have been initiated at our
insistence.


Please fill-out the evaluation sheets on Elena Chilkina.
Thanks


Start Date: 10/26/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102619.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


[IMAGE]
Account Information

	Help

Do not reply to this message. If you did not request this account,  delete it
now.

Registration Confirmed - Welcome to Yahoo!
This message confirms your new account with Yahoo!.

?

Your Yahoo! ID:
jangsungho2000
Your email address:
lcampbel@enron.com

?
What if the email address listed above is incorrect or changes in the future?
Please keep your email contact current so we can help you in case you can't
access your Yahoo! account.  To update your email address, first sign into
Yahoo! Games  or any other Yahoo! personalized service.  Then click on
"Account Info" at the top of the page.  (If "Account Info" is not available,
please click on "Options" first, then on "Account Info.")  The field you need
to change is called "Alternate email address."

What can I do with my new Yahoo! ID?

Yahoo! Mail	Yahoo! Mail
	Get your own yahoo.com email address 	Yahoo! Auctions	Yahoo! Auctions
			Buy and sell for free. 	[IMAGE]	Yahoo! Chat
					Chat with people from all over the world.
Yahoo! Calendar	Yahoo! Calendar
	Keep yourself organized. 	My Yahoo!	My Yahoo!
			Customize the way you use the internet. 	Yahoo! Games	Yahoo! Games
					New and classic online games.
Yahoo! Travel	Yahoo! Travel
	Reservations, tickets, discounts and information. 	Yahoo! Shopping	Yahoo! Shopping
			Search for your favorite products and brands and compare prices.	Yahoo! Messenger	Yahoo!
Messenger
					Get notified when you have new mail and send instant messages.

[IMAGE]	Want to learn more about Yahoo! products and services?  Click here for
an interactive tour through the world of Yahoo!

Show me more...

Policies: Please remember that your use of Yahoo! products and services is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Deletion: If you did not request this account, delete it now.  If that link
fails to delete your account, reply to this email with "REMOVE" as the
subject line.  Copy this entire email in your reply.

[192.152.140.9]


Fergus and Gibbs.

	Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate 05/31/2001 04:16 PM 	   To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES  Subject: AG Subpoena

EES has received a subpoena from the AG.  What outside counsel is advising us about these?  Fergus?  Molland?


&Enron has become aware that Company employees have been solicited for
participation in &gifting clubs.8  These clubs appear to be illegal pyramid
schemes.  If you are approached about joining a club, but aren,t sure if it,s
an illegal gifting club, contact the Better Business Bureau or your personal
legal counsel.   Employees should not in any way or manner associate Enron
Corp., its affiliated companies or Enron management with the type of clubs
described above.

Please be advised that use of the Company,s premises without management,s
prior approval or use of any of the Company,s communication services
equipment (i.e. email, fax machines, telephones, etc.) for non-Enron business
related ventures is against Company policy."


pls print.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/07/2000
09:21 AM ---------------------------

Frazier King
08/04/2000 04:44 PM
To: Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Janet Butler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Philip Crowley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Staci
Holtzman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frazier
King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Candace Kyle/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@Enron, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Colleen
Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bret Reich/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis
Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Power Point Presentation

Here is Mark Haedicke's eCommerce powerpoint presentation which he will make
next Friday at the Energy Bar Luncheon.  It look's like it will be VERY
good.  If you do not have a form to submit your reservations, let me know and
I will have Janet make you a copy.  The deadline is next Tuesday.

---------------------- Forwarded by Frazier King/FGT/Enron on 08/04/2000
04:40 PM ---------------------------

Brenda Whitehead@ECT
08/04/2000 02:04 PM
To: Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Power Point Presentation

per the request of Mark Taylor, please see this attachment:


Thanks again for your help this weekend.  I enjoyed hanging out with you.
PL


Please find attached:

1.  VNF Transmittal Memo
2.  Preliminary Draft Joint Stipulation of issues

Patricia Fry Godley
Van Ness Feldman
(202) 298-1940

 - VANDOC_106241_1.DOC
 - VANDOC_106237_1.DOC


Athena is a powerful and flexible tool.  The members of RAC have shown great
interest in Athena, and we should expect to see several of them at today's
instructional class.

We think that Energy Operations will similarly find Athena very useful, and
we strongly encourage you to sign up for Thursday's class or to stop by
today's (4:00 in EB 3270).

Regards,

Eugenio

---------------------- Forwarded by Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000 02:11
PM ---------------------------

Maria Teresa Aguilera-Peon
11/03/2000 03:51 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Peggy
Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, D
Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Myers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kevin Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Rollout of ATHENA (Formerly known as the DPR database)

Dear All,

Risk Analytics, has recently finished developing ATHENA (the database that
warehouses all of the official DPR data of Enron), which is designed to make
your work easier by giving you the following tools and breakdowns:

1. P&L Component Breakdowns
? Hedge Management
? Prudency
? Curve Shift
? New Deals

2. Risk Analysis Tools
? VARs
? Maturity Gap Risk
? Net Open Position
? Daily loss limits

The warehoused information, which is broken down by books and parts (P&L
component breakdowns/risk analysis tools), now has the visual aid of numerous
bar graphs and pie charts used to represent the information listed above -
provided to you at the touch of a button.  These charts are not only very
easy to understand, but will be helpful in your daily work analyzing trading
information.

Now that all commodity groups are performing additional analysis and
providing reports other than P&L and positions to both MRM RAC and commercial
departments, the tools provided by ATHENA have been proven to be extremely
useful.

ATHENA makes analysis of the time trend of data an effortless process, as it
has warehoused data for the past year for each commodity.

The rollout of ATHENA is currently underway, according to the following
timeline:

? From now until Friday November 10th, access to the database is being given
to the beta testers (testers already chosen).
? Monday November 13th - First instructional training class from 4-5pm.
Conference room 3270.
? Thursday November 16th - Second instructional training class from 3-4pm.
Conference room 3270.
? Subsequent classes will be scheduled depending on need.
? Production users will have access to the database within the few weeks
following November 16th.

Each of these sessions will hold up to 15 participants, and attendees are
taken on a first come first serve basis.  Please contact Pamela Sonnier (ext.
37531) to sign up for one of these training sessions.

We expect that all business controllers will want to have access to ATHENA.
Additionally, there may be other employees in your group who need access.
Please send all requests for access to ATHENA to Maria Teresa Aguilera-Peon
(ext. 35257), Jennifer Nguyen (ext. 57590), or Eugenio Perez (ext. 35828)

For further information on ATHENA, or to set up a one on one demonstration,
call Eugenio Perez (X35828), Maria Teresa Peon (X35257) or Jennifer Nguyen
(X57590).

Best regards and looking forward to working with you,

Risk Analytics


We've handled the notices on  a project specific basis.

Kay


Using information pulled together by Jennifer and BAN, I requested West Tradings Risk/Structuring Group do a more careful analysis of the above-market costs associated with the DWR contracts.  Attached is their analysis.

In this analysis we examined only the executed contracts and NOT the agreements-in principle.  (Only executed contracts were released by the state in the last few weeks.) Also, gas-indexed contracts were examined on their nongas costs only.  Since gas costs are a pass through on some contracts, we excluded them as a conservatism; i.e., we did not ascribe costs to the gas portion of the contracts since they will float with market costs over time.  These contracts were marked to market using current, applicable curves.  Finally we discounted at the LIBOR rate, which is around 4%/year.

The stranded cost under these assumptions  is approximately $10 billion.  The spreadsheet shows the overmarket costs by contract.  Note: a negative "mark-to-market" equals a positive stranded cost.

As before, this analysis is based upon Enron's confidential forward curves.  Approval from Tim Belden is needed before this analysis can be released.

Alan Comnes


FYI,

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cole, Cheryl
Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:20 AM
To:	Harris, Steven
Cc:	Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	TW 1090 Meeting

John Keller asked me to notify you of a "TW Peak Day Summer Delivery Meeting" scheduled for tomorrow, Wednesday, June 20 from 9:00 am - 10:30 am.  This meeting is being held in 3AC 31C1.

John mentioned this meeting to you yesterday in your staff meeting and wanted you to know you and any other member of your staff were more than welcome to attend the meeting if schedules permitted.  Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or need any additional information.

Thanks,

Cheryl Cole

Enron Transportation Services
Location:  3AC 3220
Tel: 713-646-8312
Fax: 713-345-5782
cheryl.cole@enron.com


Sorry, sending you the file...

---------------------- Forwarded by Jaime Williams/NA/Enron on 06/23/2000
02:25 PM ---------------------------

Jaime Williams
06/23/2000 02:22 PM
To: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mario Parra Cardoso/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Cover letter

I am sending you the Spanish translation of the cover letter that we are
planning on sendig out to our customers.  Mario Parra send it to me to taylor
it to this market.  Please review it so that there aren't any problems from
the legal and image perspectives.  Carol, perhaps makes sense to send it to
your Mexian Advisors, since they would have concerns regarding the language
used in the promotion of this products.

Any questions please let me know.

Kind regards.


Kirk,

I would modify this document slightly.  The first section is titled "Introduction to Risk Management" and the second section is "Hedging Instruments/Risk Management Products".  However, many of the bullet points in the first section are describing hedging instruments that belong in second section.  I would limit the introduction to types of risk, identifying risk, and examples when risks are not hedged.  Then the second section should contain all the details of hedging tools.  Definitions of derivatives and how they can be used to manage the risk in the first section would be in this section.  The third section would include the roles and accounting basics.  You might want to include the commodity 101 info here, at least gas and power.

Phillip

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McDaniel, Kirk
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; O'rourke, Tim; Frolov, Yevgeny
Subject:	Final Internal Review for Sign Off: Topics and Related Objectives

Gentlemen
Please take  a look at the attached document. Provide me with your final input, if any, in so that I can give Accenture Sign off acceptance. This document includes input Accenture received or derived from yesterday's Design Scope meeting.

I request everyone's input by COB, Thursday 9/27 in so that if changes are needed we can still get final sign off by COB Friday 9/28 or Monday 10/1. Thanks

Cheers
Kirk

 - Topics and Related Objectives.doc << File: Topics and Related Objectives.doc >>


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Cooke, Ian
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris; Clark, Chad; Lambie, Chris; Dunsmore, Paul; Taylor, Fabian
Subject:	FW: [Fwd: Tux]

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Unger, Chris
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Cooke, Ian; Renneberg, Mark
Subject:	FW: [Fwd: Tux]

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	gosselinl@rflcda.com@ENRON <mailto:gosselinl@rflcda.com@ENRON>
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Kirk Chace; Unger, Chris
Subject:	[Fwd: Tux]

Return-path: Jennifer_Peterson@cpr.ca <mailto:Jennifer_Peterson@cpr.ca>
Received: from mail1.cprailway.com (access6.cpr.ca [209.115.235.6]) by smail-cal.shawcable.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2000.05.17.04.13.p6) with ESMTP id <0GNZ00LOMGYDW1@smail-cal.shawcable.com <mailto:0GNZ00LOMGYDW1@smail-cal.shawcable.com>> for lori.gosselin?rflcda.com@sims-ms-daemon <mailto:lori.gosselin?rflcda.com@sims-ms-daemon> (ORCPT rfc822;gosselinl@rflcda.com) ; Fri, 07 Dec 2001 10:08:39 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 10:08:22 -0700
From: Jennifer_Peterson@cpr.ca <mailto:Jennifer_Peterson@cpr.ca>
Subject: Tux
To: ATreleaven@CEFranklin.com <mailto:ATreleaven@CEFranklin.com>, CarolynC@cancer.ab.ca <mailto:CarolynC@cancer.ab.ca>, cathy.sandor@redcross.ca <mailto:cathy.sandor@redcross.ca>, brown__69@hotmail.com <mailto:brown__69@hotmail.com>, super.dave@home.com <mailto:super.dave@home.com>, hayesnichols@hotmail.com <mailto:hayesnichols@hotmail.com>, jenmoody@canada.com <mailto:jenmoody@canada.com>, jennifer_peterson@cpr.ca <mailto:jennifer_peterson@cpr.ca>, Kimberly.Dornan@CalgaryHealthRegion.ca <mailto:Kimberly.Dornan@CalgaryHealthRegion.ca>, MBates@novatel.ca <mailto:MBates@novatel.ca>, OMulyk@novatel.ca <mailto:OMulyk@novatel.ca>, barkleyr@telusplanet.net <mailto:barkleyr@telusplanet.net>, petersonscotty@aol.com <mailto:petersonscotty@aol.com>, tjknapik@ucalgary.ca <mailto:tjknapik@ucalgary.ca>, claire_l_robinson@email.mobil.com <mailto:claire_l_robinson@email.mobil.com>, THyman@petro-canada.ca <mailto:THyman@petro-canada.ca>, mmackenzie@hopewell.com <mailto:mmackenzie@hopewell.com>, gosselinl@rflcda.com <mailto:gosselinl@rflcda.com>
Message-id: <OFDE167A10.18DE027F-ON87256B1B.005DDBD5@cprailway.com <mailto:OFDE167A10.18DE027F-ON87256B1B.005DDBD5@cprailway.com>>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: MULTIPART/MIXED ; BOUNDARY="Boundary_(ID_KhSwia2S96DPPmLbB50oFQ)"
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on npsmtp01/CPR(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 12/07/2001 10:08:37 AM
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Peterson/bro0232/CPR on
12/07/2001 10:18 ---------------------------

11/23/2001 14:31
Todd Workman
Todd Workman
Todd Workman
11/23/2001 14:31
11/23/2001 14:31

To:
cc:
Subject:  Tux

Per conv... enjoy!
(See attached file: Penguin.mpg)

 - Penguin.mpg


For January 2000 for a couple of weekends SJersey tried to do intradays.  Due
to the interconnect and other supply we were not able to change their
nominations.  South Jersey have always been told that changing nomination on
the weekend would be on best available.  Julie Punches from Sjersey due to
her changes on the weekend is over at some of her CDC markets is asking to
allocate the excess gas to CES agg pools.
Would this be something Enron would do???


Mike,

I've been trying to figure out what is meant by the last sentence. Can you
(or Dave) clarify what is wanted?  Does it mean that payments must be current
for the guaranty, etc, to be acceptable?

Thanks,

Kay

michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 06/30/2000 11:48:23 AM
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com, Kathleen.Clark@enron.com
cc: karla.hesketh@us.abb.com

Subject: Enron Contract Verbage

Dear Team,
Dave mentioned that probably the only other change would be in the assignment
section article xxii and that should not be any big change.

MIKE
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael O
Sandridge/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB on 06/30/2000 11:44 AM
---------------------------
|------------->
|(Embedded    |
|image moved  |
|to file:     |
|pic05234.pcx)|
|             |
|------------->
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Frank Chmiel/StLouis/USTRA/ABB                                          |
  |06/30/2000 11:38 AM (Phone: +(314) 679-4702, Dept.: FIELD SALES)        |
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------|

To:   Michael O Sandridge/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA
cc:   Karla Hesketh/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA, David
      Onuscheck/ETI/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA
Subject:  Enron Contract Verbage

Security Level:?         Internal

Mike,
     When  we  spoke  this morning, Dave advised that one change to the
language
that  will  be  required is  the addition of the words in red , in bold added
by
ABB at the end of this paragraph in section 22.2 of the contract.

     In  the  case of an assignment to a party described in (ii), (vi), or
(vii)
(other  than   Enron  Engineering  &  Construction  or  NEPCO),  Seller shall
be
entitled  to  request  and  receive  an  appropriate guaranty, letter of
credit,
payment  bond  or  other  reasonable  form of payment security, in amount not
to
exceed the amount of the Purchase Amount remaining to be paid at the time of
the
assignment,  unless  the  assignor  agrees  to  remain  liable  for  all
future
liabilities  under  this  Agreement.  A letter of guaranty, letter of credit,
or
payment bond provided by an entity rated BBB+ or better shall be deemed to be
an
appropriate  form  of  security  for  the purpose of this provision , so long
as
payment  in  full  has  been  made  in accordance with the schedule set forth
in
Article VI.

     Additional commentary may come later today when Dave reaches his first
stop
on his flight back to Raliegh.
     Frank

 - pic05234.pcx


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Rodenburg, Eric" <erodenbu@UtiliCorp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 8:29 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Spraggins, Gary; Carr, James; Blair, Jean; Wilkens, Jerry; Clapper, Karen; Washington, Kathy; Callans, Nancy; Bryan, Randy; Walden, Shirley
Subject:	SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls

 <<SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls>>   This is for Tuesday the 22nd
also.

 - SUNFLOWER - NNG - HOURLY - 2002.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
01:22 PM ---------------------------

Jay Fitzgerald
01/12/2001 08:59 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fwd: OU

Thought you guys might like this...

 - OU.exe


Mark:

Just a reminder about Peggy's imminent departure (tomorrow) and our need to
replace her.  I'd like to speak with Francisco Pinto Leite, but don't want to
mess up things internally.  Please let me know whenever you think it would be
appropriate for me to call him.

Best regards - Max


Hi Ben,

Has anyone asked you to take a look at this?  If not, I would be interested
in your comments.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001 11:42
AM ---------------------------
From: Catherine Clark/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/23/2001 11:24 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Meeting between EE&CC and ENA

Sorry about that.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Clark, Catherine
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Bills, Lisa
Subject: Meeting between EE&CC and ENA

Kay,
Lisa asked me to see if you would represent ENA Legal at the meeting between
EE&CC and ENA on Monday, Jan 29th.  Having worked at both companies, you
would add a lot of insight to the crafting of a "new project development
process".  The agenda is for Ozzie, Mike Coleman, Lisa and you to give brief
presentations (5-10 minutes each) on the project development process, with
recommendations on changes to be made.  You've already seen the notes, but
I'm attaching an updated version.

Please let me know if you will be available and if you want to change any
discussion bullets and/or recommendations.  The most recent message had the
meeting taking place on Monday, January 29th from 11:30 am to 1:30 pm (with
lunch provided).  Megan will let everyone know which room will be reserved.
There is also a pre-meeting tomorrow (Wed) at 10:30 am in EB 2868 (it should
only last 30 minutes).  Thank you in advance for your help.
-Catherine
x3-9943


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Jeffrey Hodge
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Jeff Hodge 5/23/01
Report Total: $1,744.25
Amount Due Employee: $1,744.25

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


do you want to hit sherlocks around  6-630


Per Gas Control, this will be down until the 18th.


(See attached file: NOMS_02_14_02.xls)
 - NOMS_02_14_02.xls


Dear Jeff,

I have not received any payment from the following Pledges to our annual
gala which took place on April 7, 2001:

Natsource        Contact:                 Address:
EDF Mann         Contact:                 Address:
Banque Paribas   Contact:                 Address:
Spectron         Contact:                 Address:

I have pledges of $5,000 from each company.  Marti told me that you did
write to the appropriate contacts.  Do we need to follow up again?

I do want to close out the gala pledges by June 30, 2001.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.  Please let me know what I can
do to help.  My direct line is 713-284-8262.

Grace Pierce
Assistant Director of Development


Please check this for me when you have an opportunity,

Thanks
David
---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2000 04:32
PM ---------------------------
From: Susan Flynn on 05/11/2000 04:19 PM
To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: PPL Corporation

 David  --- I gave this doc to Tana Jones (for Eonline trading).  It also
referred to physical deals, so she was going to pass it on to Debra
Perkingiere.   Call Tana - she can tell you where it is at.   Thanks!     (it
did not effect financial trading).

	David P Dupre
	05/11/2000 01:28 PM

		 To: Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: PPL Corporation

Could I have a copy of the assignment which I sent to you via interoffice
mail the other day for
PPL Utilities?? I would be interested in picking this up from you if possible.

Thanks
David


TOPIC(S):  Tap & Valve Requests on NNG
 DATE:  December 6th
LOCATION:  697
TIME:  2:00-3:00 pm


Attached are the revised Password Application, Terms of Use, Privacy Policy,
and ETA.  I have read through each of these once, but would like to proof
them one more time tonight for typographical errors, but thought I would get
these around tonight for your review.  Please call with comments.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


If you have not already received the final PRC rating from HR please find it
below for your Associate:


No problem.  To be honest, I was concerned--given how wide-ranging it was--that I might step in something unintentionally.  Please let me know if I do/did.  Also, keep in touch with how the issues go with them, since they are clearly trying to use the reg. issues as leverage, and in that regard, often offering up worst-case scenarios.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:52 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: CA Extenstions/Amendments

great job with uc-csu.  thanks.

From:	Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/07/2001 12:49 PM
To:	James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/ENRON@enronxgate, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	RE: CA Extenstions/Amendments

Quick adder:  It appears that the utilities took a hard line on the amendment issue in their written comments, which is no surprise.  Utilities position is obviously extreme but it means there's likely to be a signficant fight over the issue.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:39 PM
To:	Mara, Susan
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff; Frazier, Lamar; Blachman, Jeremy; Smith, Mike
Subject:	RE: CA Extenstions/Amendments

After the PHC today, we should have a better feel where the parties are and what the discussions will provide for.  Sue, can you make sure that Jeremy and team have a synopsis and outline of next steps.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:10 PM
To:	Mara, Susan
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Frazier, Lamar; Blachman, Jeremy
Subject:	RE: CA Extenstions/Amendments

thanks.  this is really important to the restructures we are working on.

From:	Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/07/2001 12:07 PM
To:	Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate, James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/ENRON@enronxgate
Subject:	RE: CA Extenstions/Amendments

SCE and PG&E have raised these questions.  The questions came up at a meeting with the utilities on Oct 2 and again on OCt 25 -- SCE went so far as to say that in a response filed last week, I believe. The questions arise because, once you have a date cutting off direct access -- what can be allowed thereafter and what can't?  Once DA, always DA? (we say) What consitutes a written DA "contract".  (the utilities ask) You'd think the utilities would have better things to spend their time on.  Actually, SCE most likely benefits (pays off its debts sooner) if it can capture more customers. These are similar to issues Commissioner Wood is investigating and may result in a decision along those lines that goes to the Commission for a vote.  We are opposing as are 95% of the customer groups.  A pre-hearing conf is being held at 2 pm today with Wood's friendly ALJ to talk further about these type of issues.  I will keep you apprised.

Sue

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:47 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Frazier, Lamar; Blachman, Jeremy
Subject:	CA Extenstions/Amendments

I heard that the CPUC and/or the utilities have taken the position that any amendment to a contract after 9/20, like a pricing amendment, is a new contract entered after 9/20 and therefore invalid.  Is this true?  Does this hold any water?


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000
04:18 PM ---------------------------

"Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com> on 12/13/2000 04:13:55 PM
To: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <llawner@enron.com>, <rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>,
<Richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Final Filed Version

The filed version of the comments in the San Diego Gas & Electric matter at
FERC is attached.

 - SANDIEGO.DOC


Ruth,  Attached is a redline and clean version of the amendment.  I added the language we discussed on the phone.  I also added paragraph and associated changes to make it clear that this pricing doesn't comment until December 1, 2001.


---------------------- Forwarded by Angela
Palmieri/Marketing/Corporate/Blockbuster on 09/13/2001 01:38 PM
---------------------------

Gammona@aol.com on 09/13/2001 01:19:59 PM

To:   Kimberly.Amellin@comptroller.co.orange.fl.us, jeff@liveplanet.com,
      CEOntranin@aol.com, jamiestewart@cybersouth.com, cfaulkner@pssd.com,
      doogiefsu@hotmail.com, Alliraye@aol.com, nomad2000@earthlink.net,
      Hoki@ho-kwan.com, Mikeyhop@aol.com, JBlume258@aol.com, kapusta@ticon.net,
      karen2000@nemaine.com, jayelee75@yahoo.com-, mabelhome@yahoo.com,
      Katiemacla@aol.com, Xenamenofrito@aol.com, TessTessan@aol.com,
      ashoverseas@hotmail.com, Miapalm@aol.com, showbizphil@msn.com,
      skouros@usc.edu, Angela Palmieri/Marketing/Corporate/Blockbuster@BBEGI
cc:
Subject:  Fwd: Fw: Candle Lighting - Please participate / FW: U.S.Pride Day!!

-
>
> Subject: Candle Lighting-Please participate
>
> Whether you choose to do this or not, is up to you, but I believe it is a
> positive idea in the middle of all of this tragedy.
>
> Friday Night at 7:00 p.m. step out your door, stop your car, or step out
of
> your establishment and light a candle. We will show the world that
Americans
> are strong and united together against terrorism. Please pass this to
> everyone on your e-mail list. We need to reach everyone across the United
> States quickly.
>
> The message: WE STAND UNITED - WE WILL NOT TOLERATE TERRORISM.
>
> We need press to cover this-- we need the world to see.
>
>
> Tomorrow (9-13-01)is U.S. Color day.  Red, White & Blue should be worn in
> honor of
> our
> fellow Americans that died.  Jeans
> worn will be blue.  The goal is to get the whole nation to patricipate.
> Send
> this to 10 other people.
>
> In memory of all those who perished; the passengers and the
> pilots on the United Air and AA flights, the workers in the World Trade
> Center and the Pentagon, and all the innocent bystanders. Our prayers go
> out
> to the friends and families of the deceased. Send this to at least 10
> people
> to show your support. DONT BREAK IT!!!!!!  God's speed to all those who
> have
> lost their lives...GOD BLESS AMERICA and the freedom it represents
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message


See attached letter

EB


Per my voice mail message.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 12:55 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin Meredith @ ENRON                           12/11/2000 05:29 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba
Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Althaus/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert B
Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NEW ENRONONLINE PRODUCT - PLEASE APPROVE

Your review and approval of the following two product type in the EOL
Datamanager is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for
approval at the bottom of this e-mail).

Traders: Lee Jackson and Alan Engberg

US PurEth OPIS   vs LLDPE CMAI           Jan01           c/LB

A US Purity Ethane financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp.,
under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price
submitted by Counterparty on the website (the Fixed Price) in each case in
respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period is the volume submitted by
Counterparty via EnronOnline.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date to the
Termination Date. The Effective Date is 01 Jan 2001. The Termination Date is
31 Jan 2001.
The Index for a month shall be the difference between
(i) the arithmetic average of the high and low Cents/Pound prices of Linear
Low Density Polyethylene - Butene film grade published under the headings
"North America Product Prices for (DATE): LLDPE Domestic" in the month-end
issue of Chemical Market Associates, Inc.'s Monomers Market Report effective
for such month, and
(ii) the average of the prices for each day in the Determination Period,
where the price for each day shall be the 'Avg' price for Purity Ethane
published in the table entitled 'Mont Belvieu Spot Gas Liquids Prices' under
the heading 'Purity Ethane:  Any Current Month' in the issue of Oil Price
Information Service ('OPIS') that reports prices effective for such
Determination Period.
The price is quoted in cents (US) per unit of volume which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be pounds.

==============================================================================
=====
STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

Thanks - Rob Cass  -  Melba Lozano - Kevin Meredith
                   x35491           x58986                  x39555


Does the info as provided from HR indicate MBA's from UT?  I know that Enron
probably has a number of undergrads from UT.  At this point, I am
specifically interested in UT MBA's, as it is the Houston Chapter of UT's
Graduate Business Network for which I will now serve on the steering
committee.  Thanks!  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2000 06:04 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Elyse Kalmans @ ENRON                           01/04/2000 05:01 PM

To: Lisa Norman/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Alumni List

Happy New Year, Lisa!  Can you please pull a list of University of Texas
alumni for me?  I'd appreciate your help.  Thanks!

Elyse
30565


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

December 08, 2000 5:00pm through December 11, 2000 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

EI:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: HR   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS: UNIX     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

OTHER SYSTEMS: REMEDY
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 12/8/2000 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  5:15:00 PM CT
 Fri 12/8/2000 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  3:15:00 PM PT
 Fri 12/8/2000 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 12/8/2000 at  11:15:00 PM
London
Outage:  RmailSniffer
Environments Impacted:  All
Purpose: Review of Mail logs has shown that between 7:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.
50% of mail messages fail.  The update will copy failed messages to another
directory for an admin to process.
Backout: Reset RmailSniffer service to original settings.
Contact(s):  Carlos Perez    713-345-708
  Christian Smerz   713-345-7410

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:   SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center
(713) 853-5536   Information Risk Management

Specific Applications Help:
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]


send check w/Greg for lunch $10.00


Vince,

I agree.  If you think that this candidate would be good for your group
specifically - I would invite him in directly.

Hope all is well.
Ashley

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
10/24/2000 04:09 PM
To: Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student

Ashley,

This is one resume I got today. I think that it makes sense to invite him
for an interview directly with my group. He does not qualify as an analyst
candidate.
What do you think?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------

Rajnish Kamat <kamat@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/23/2000 07:55:31 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student

Dr. Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director and Head of Research
Enron Corp.

Dear Dr. Kaminski,
It was a pleasure talking with you and attending your talk today.
I am a graduate student in Industrial Engg. and Operations
Research working with Prof. Shmuel Oren
on topics in financial instrument pricing and design of
contracts in deregulated electricity markets. I am also
doing research in auction models and computable equilibrium
models with applications in electricity market design.

I am planning to graduate with a Ph.D. in May 2001 and would
appreciate hearing about any opportunities in your group at Enron.
I am attaching at copy of my resume (file: cvrkamat.doc) for your perusal.

Thanking you,
Sincerely,

Rajnish Kamat
Graduate Student
IEOR, UC-Berkeley

4135, Etcheverry Hall
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, CA, 94710

 - CVRKAMAT.DOC


Hey, I didn't call you back because of the fuckup that I learned of right
after you hung up on me.  I'm sorry.


Command: MATCH
Date: 7/20/2001
Time: 11:20:54 AM
TransactionID: 100127
AgencyID: 10116
Recipient: Tulane University
Gift Accounting Office 3439 Prytania St., Suite 300
New Orleans, LA 70115
DonorID: 5374
GiftDate: 7/16/2001
GiftAmount: 100
Purpose: Tulane International Initiatives Fund contribution
Result: Success

If you have not already done so, please send your donation to
Tulane University
Gift Accounting Office 3439 Prytania St., Suite 300
New Orleans, LA 70115.
If they do not receive your donation within five days we will have to deny this request.

We have received the above Request.
If everything appears correct there is no need to contact us.
However, if you did not make this request or there is an error in the above information, then email us at: enron@easymatch.com or call us at: 1-866-545-9204.


What's that number?  I think you said 917-971-0676.


Hey Bobbi,

Here is a revised nomination sheet for March, and also, I know you'll be
shocked, but I sent the contract to the lawyers for approval, so we should
get it back shortly!

See ya


Jeff,

I gather you have an internal staff that currently handles your PR
needs.  If you are interested in learning about the possibility of taking
advantage of the resources of a well-connected PR agency, we should talk.

  I am confident that S & S can generate editorial
coverage that will influence your distribution and sales.

I believe S & S Public Relations can be influential in making sure your
press releases get the attention of key editors and analysts.

Our experience includes B2B and B2C solutions in the web-development tools,
e-commerce, e-business, communications, wireless, networking, storage and
security arenas.

The advantages of hiring our firm are the media and analyst contacts we
have already
established. We know what works to get you more product and corporate
coverage to, basically, take you to a higher PR level.

Our system is in place to capitalize on editorial calendar opportunities
and schedule important appointments at trade shows.  We can position you as
a source for trend stories in the industry.
In addition, we can secure coverage that will influence the investor community.

Included in our services are media tours,
interviewing for user stories to be a part of the
PR strategy and corporate PR; i.e., telling your story to top high-tech
magazines, national business magazines and newspapers.

I thought you may be able to use our expertise.
I would be happy to meet with you at PC Expo.

Best Regards,

Jill
Jill Abramson  Vice President
S & S Public Relations
1-800-287-2279  ext 238
jilla@sspr.com

www.sspr.com


With the extension of the PRC to all organizations, questions have arisen
about the results of this process. This memo provides some details about the
PRC process.

First some context:  The key to Enron,s success is the increasing quality and
dedication of our talent.  As we continue to attract and retain the very best
people, we all have continued to raise the performance bar throughout the
organization.  At the core of our system are the following principles:

? Hire the best people.
? Provide challenging opportunities.
? Pay well ( and pay for performance (with bonuses based on merit, not
entitlement).
? Evaluate performance through a rigorous review process.
? Provide clear feedback and direction to employees.

The PRC is a critical component of our performance management system.  The
PRC is built on this foundation:

? 360 degree performance feedback.
? Review by a broad group, not just the supervisor.
? A relative ranking of performance across Enron to determine promotions and
to allocate bonus money.

In addition to understanding this broad philosophy, we all need to understand
the following details:

? Relative ranking.  Enron uses the descriptors &superior8, &excellent8,
&strong8, "satisfactory", &needs improvement8, and &issues8 to group all
employees.  This year, &relative to his/her peers8 precedes each of these
descriptors. This qualifier confirms what we have done and will continue to
do in practice; that is, evaluate individual performers against their peers.
It is possible, therefore, for someone to perform at the same or higher level
compared to prior periods, yet receive a lower rating for the current period
if other employees, performance raised the bar.
? Teamwork.  A relative ranking may invite the view that for one employee to
gain, others must suffer.  However, feedback is explicitly solicited on
teamwork when evaluating each individual,s performance.  Anyone who attempts
to gain by withholding information or refusing to collaborate with others in
the organization will suffer in a relative ranking on this key performance
criterion.
? Preferred distribution. In large part, the quality of our workforce has
been driven by our willingness to make tough decisions. We have consistently
captured business opportunities and overcome obstacles because we have made
the choices that had to be made in order to constantly improve our employee
talent base. The preferred distribution (5% superior, 30% excellent, 30%
strong, 20% satisfactory, and 15% needs improvement or issues) forces PRC
committee members to identify those who must improve in order to remain at
Enron as well as to single out top talent for special recognition. There is
some flexibility in the system, but every organization must ultimately face
this difficult question: have we achieved the highest level of performance or
are there still improvements that must be made? Few, if any, organizations
adhere exactly to the preferred distribution. Rather, they exercise informed
discretion in the individual categories and meet a distribution that reflects
their groups, overall effectiveness and need for improvement.
? Communicating Ratings. Everyone rated &satisfactory8 or below should know
his/her rating. Each organization has determined for itself whether to
communicate ratings of &strong8 and above.  In all cases, employees will
receive feedback about their performance against expectations, areas of
success, and areas that need improvement.

We hope this answers most of your questions about the PRC process.  We would
like your feedback and ideas on how to improve the PRC process going
forward.  Therefore, we will be conducting an eSpeak in the near future, and
there will be other methods we will create to let us know what you think.  In
the meantime, please feel free to consult with your HR Generalist if you have
any immediate questions, comments, or concerns.


John, I thought I would send you a note to outline our conversation re. David
Redmond.  Dave will return to the London office in late May.  In late
February we will pinpoint the group/job that will best suit Dave and Enron.
All efforts will be made to get Dave an option trading related position.

Regards,

John Lavorato


Please go ahead and update Sitara.

D

Ami.Chokshi@enron.com on 06/22/2000 02:57:26 PM
To: dfarmer@enron.com
cc:
Subject: TUFCO - Prebid

HPLR      Est. 65000
WB        Est. 40000


Updates
Jennifer Burns - new cell phone number
Kathy McMahon - new executive committee assistant


FIne

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robinson, Mitch
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:06 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Duran, W. David
Subject:	FW: Alstom Executive

Louise -

We've negotiated an MOU with Alstom that has helped us fix the purchase price for CFB based power plants.  It does not commit us to spend any money today; it's really just a strong guideline for what the EPC will look like.

Having said that, Alstom considers it a BIG deal, and they are flying in some heavies from Paris for the signing ceremony.  The guy below is the lead person from Paris.  Additionally, Fritz Gautschi, Alstom's Country President will be coming.

Bottom line:  It's tentatively scheduled for the morning of 17 October here in Houston.  If you and Dave are available, I'll coordinate.  You won't need to sign, just provide some presence.  There's still some flexibility if that day doesn't work for you.

Thanks,

Mitch

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Golden, Bruce
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 4:12 PM
To:	Robinson, Mitch
Subject:	Alstom Executive

Nick Salmon - Executive Vice President - member of Alstom Executive committee

Nick Salmon joined GEC in 1988 after a number of years in China Light and Power Company. From General Manager of the Power Station Projects Division, he moved on to Deputy Managing Director of the Power Plants activity in 1989 following the merger of GEC and ALSTHOM, then Deputy Managing Director of the Gas Turbine and Diesels activity.
In 1993 he was appointed Chief Executive of Babcock International plc returning to ALSTOM as President of the Energy sector in 1997.
He became Executive Vice President ABB ALSTOM Power upon the creation of the company in 1998. He was appointed Executive Vice President ALSTOM Power in May 2000, following the acquisition by ALSTOM of ABB's 50% share in ABB ALSTOM Power.

He is a member of ALSTOM's Executive Committee.


-----Original Message-----
From: Imai, Rika
Sent: Wed 1/9/2002 4:17 PM
To: Benchluch, Moises; Cline, Kevin; Giron, Gustavo; Marquez, Mauricio; Rust, Bill; Soykok, Gulay; Williams, Ryan
Cc:
Subject: Reminder

Please remember that your H drives will not be moved to Netco on Friday evening.

Please make appropriate arrangements

Rika


Start Date: 1/14/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011424.txt


-----Original Message-----
From: Bharati, Rakesh
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:38 AM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: FW: Note on Valuation

Vince,

I have it.

Rakesh

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaminski, Vince J
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:39 PM
To: Bharati, Rakesh; Shanbhogue, Vasant
Cc: Kaminski, Vince J; 'kimberly.r.scardino@us.andersen.com'
Subject: RE: Note on Valuation

Rakesh,

I have informed Ryan Siurek (cc Rick Buy) on Oct 4
that I cannot sign off on any analysis
done by our group without looking at full set of
legal documents related to the LJM
transactions. Those documents were not provided and therefore
we cannot sign off on any analysis done in the past.

I have come to a conclusion that we cannot support
the valuations based on verbal and
often conflicting information, without doing  full due
diligence.

Feel free to provide the information to Kimberly but,
please, inform her I cannot support the quantitative analysis
we have done in the past. I am especially concerned about the conflict between
the existence of the restriction and the existence of a put that are, in my view,
mutually exclusive.

Vince

-----Original Message-----
From: Bharati, Rakesh
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Kaminski, Vince J; Shanbhogue, Vasant
Subject: FW: Note on Valuation
Importance: High

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: kimberly.r.scardino@us.andersen.com
[mailto:kimberly.r.scardino@us.andersen.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Bharati, Rakesh; Siurek, Ryan
Subject: Re: Note on Valuation
Importance: High

This is the latest version of your Raptor valuation memo that we have.  Is
there a more recent version with the changes we discussed (i.e. UBS shares
are not in a forward contract, 4 year restriction, etc.)?

To:   Kimberly R. Scardino@ANDERSEN WO
cc:
Date: 09/26/2001 10:43 AM
From: Rakesh.Bharati@enron.com
Subject:  Note on Valuation

Kimberly,

Here is the note.  Do let me know if I can assist further.

 <<Note to AA09242001.doc>>

Rakesh Bharati
Phone: (713) 853-0936
Fax:     (713) 646-2503

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
(See attached file: Note to AA09242001.doc)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


Good morning all:

Below is an email from Kevin Sweeney inquiring about a software demo that
he thought might have been in our group.  If anyone had this demo, please
let Vince know.

Thanks!

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
05:10 PM ---------------------------

Kevin Sweeney
10/23/2000 06:53 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kara Maloney/NA/Enron@Enron, Mario de la Ossa/NA/Enron@ENRON, Matt A
Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Pro Opticus

Vince,

I understand that you or someone in your group had a demo from the above
group last Friday.  I was wondering if this was part of a push to bring more
options' analytics to the traders' desks, and if so, if you could explain
what that effort looks like?  One of the Global Markets traders, Mario de la
Ossa also had a look at the software as he has used it in the past.

Thanks,

Kevin


Art:

As I previously requested, please make sure that Darla gets this spredsheet
as well as she will be checking out w/ Craig.

I faxed three confirms to you today.  I didn't hear from you as to whether
you received the fax...please let me know if it arrived at
 503/464-3822.

Chris

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Sean Breen" <sbreen@czn.com>                           01/11/2001
03:55 PM

To: "Art Gelber" <agelber@gelbercorp.com>
cc: "Lipke, Craig" <CWLipke@czn.com>, "Chris Foster" <cfoster@enron.com>
Subject: Gas Transactions

Art,
In order to facilitate our gas?accounts  payable?process, please email
monthly to Craig Lipke of Citizens an  electronic spreadsheet?summary?showing
all of?Citizens'  then-current forward trading positions.? I envision that
this would be  available by the 10th of the following month (e.g. January's
report by February  10).? Craig will be using the data to substantiate Enron
monthly billings  and will verify the spreadsheet data against our hardcopy
record of gas edeal  sheets/Enron confirmations.? Thank you for your
cooperation in this matter.  Please call if you have questions.