User iD:  enronuslw
PW:        bnaweb22

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"BNA Highlights" <bhighlig@bna.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22BNA+20Highlights+22+20+3Cbhighlig+40bna+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, June 04, 2001 11:28 PM
To:	BNA Highlights
Subject:	June 5 -- U.S. Law Week's Legal News

______________________________

THE U.S. LAW WEEK'S LEGAL NEWS
Highlights & Table of Contents
June 5, 2001
______________________________

ISSN 1522-4317

Registered Web subscribers can access the full text of these
articles by using the URL link supplied.

Information about becoming a subscriber or signing up for a
FREE Web trial is available at http://web.bna.com or call
BNA Customer Relations at 1-800-372-1033, Mon. - Fri. 8:30
am - 7:00 pm (ET).
__________

HIGHLIGHTS
__________

SENATE BILL WOULD EXCLUDE FROM INCOME TAX AMOUNTS RECEIVED
IN PAYMENT OF DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) introduces legislation to
exclude from taxable income awards received in judgment or
settlement for claims of discrimination or violation of
civil rights. The Civil Rights Tax Relief Act of 2001 also
would eliminate the double taxation of attorneys' fees under
contingency fee agreements and allow income averaging for
back pay and front pay awarded for discrimination claims. A
companion bill is pending in the House.

The legislation would correct an unintended consequence of
the 1996 Small Business Job Protection Act, which made
damage awards that are not based on physical injury or
physical sickness taxable to the plaintiff. "Because most
acts of employment discrimination and civil rights
violations do not cause physical injuries, this provision
has had a direct and negative impact on plaintiffs who
successfully prove that they have been subjected to
intentional employment discrimination or other intentional
violations of their civil rights," Collins explains. . . .
Page 2746

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g1c5d3_

NLRB ADOPTS BRIGHT-LINE RULE FOR DECERTIFICATION ELECTIONS,
PROHIBITS INCUMBENT UNIONS FROM USING NONEMPLOYEES AS
OBSERVERS

The National Labor Relations Board adopts a "bright-line
rule" prohibiting incumbent labor organizations from using
their nonemployee agents as election observers for
decertification elections. The board overturns a
decertification election despite the lack of any evidence of
misconduct by the union agent, citing neutrality of the
election process as the reason for its bright-line rule.

The board distinguishes decertification elections from
initial representation elections, in which nonemployee union
observers are allowed providing the agency does not engage
in misconduct and the agent's presence does not interfere
with any party's rights. "In our view, it is more likely
that an employee would be influenced by the presence of a
person who is an agent of a union that "is" his bargaining
representative than by a person who is an agent of a union
that wishes to "become" the bargaining representative." . .
. Page 2745

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g1m6a3_

FTC CLEARS AMAZON'S REVISED PRIVACY POLICY,  APPROVES
TRUSTE'S COPPA SAFE HARBOR PROGRAM

The Federal Trade Commission concludes that a change in
Amazon.com's online privacy policy concerning the
circumstances in which the company might disclose personal
information about its customers does not violate the FTC
Act. The FTC's conclusions are in response to a petition
alleging that the electronic retailer deceived consumers in
its representations about privacy of personal information. .
. . Page 2743

The Federal Trade Commission approves the safe harbor
program for children's online data proposed by TRUSTe, an
organization that grants privacy seals to Web sites. Firms
adhering to guidelines established by TRUSTe will be
presumed to be in compliance with regulations implementing
the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, which require
that Web sites directed at children post comprehensive
privacy policies on their sites and obtain parental consent
before collecting personal information from children under
the age of 13.  . . . Page 2744

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g0q3p0_

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g0z7a6_

________

ANALYSIS
________

TAXATION: The author of this week's "Analysis & Perspective"
discusses tax disputes that can arise after a case has been
settled, the most common being whether taxes should be
withheld from the settlement amount. . . . Page 2739

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4a5n4j8_

__________________

ALSO IN THIS ISSUE
__________________

A complete topical index of Legal News.

ANTITRUST: The number of countries attempting to oversee and
control mergers is on the rise, increasing the filing burden
for multinational companies, according an annual survey by
the law firm of White & Case"". . . . Page 2741

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4f9r9q7_

ATTORNEYS: The Maryland bar's ethics committee advises a law
firm that it may receive fees directly from an out-of-state
law firm serving as co-counsel. . . . Page 2741

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4f5z0j7_

BANKING: The Federal Reserve Board is drafting proposed
legislation to reduce some of the legal impediments to check
handling and encourage digital check processing, according
to a Fed official. . . . Page 2742

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g0q2w1_

COMMERCIAL LAW: An American Bar Association task force
outlines a plan for adoption of an online alternative
dispute resolution provider trustmark--a common symbol that
would ensure a user of ODR services of the provider's
adherence to a shared set of guidelines or procedures. . . .
Page 2743

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g0p7r7_

CONSUMER PROTECTION: The Federal Trade Commission finds that
Amazon.com's revised privacy policy does not deceive
consumers concerning the circumstances in which the company
might disclose personal customer data to third parties. . .
. Page 2743

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g0q3p0_

CONSUMER PROTECTION: The Federal Trade Commission approves
the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act safe harbor
program proposed by TRUSTe. Firms adhering to guidelines
established by TRUSTe will be presumed to be in compliance
with regulations implementing the COPPA. . . . Page 2744

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g0z7a6_

LABOR: The National Labor Relations Board adopts a rule for
union decertification elections, barring incumbent unions
from using as election observers agents who does not work
for the employer. . . . Page 2745

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g1m6a3_

TAXATION: Sen. Susan Collins introduces a bill to exclude
from the taxable income of a plaintiff any award received in
judgment or settlement of a claim for discrimination or
violation of a civil right. . . . Page 2746

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g1c5d3_

TRADEMARKS: Officials from the World Intellectual Property
Organization conduct a consultation to discuss the
organization's latest recommendations for protecting against
"bad faith, abusive, misleading or unfair" registration of
domain names. . . . Page 2746

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g0p7t6_

TRADEMARKS: The registration of the domain name
"aimster.com" for a peer-to-peer file-sharing service that
interacts with Internet instant messaging services, in
effect, free-rides on America Online Inc.'s trademarked AIM
[AOL Instant Messenger] service in bad faith and in
violation of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy, an
arbitration panel of the National Arbitration Forum
concludes. . . . Page 2748

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g0p7c2_

UNITED STATES: The House Judiciary Committee approves
legislation that would require federal agencies to pay out
of their own budgets judgments against them in employment
discrimination and whistleblower cases. . . . Page 2749

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g1c5c3_

NOMINATIONS AND CONFIRMATIONS: . . . Page 2749

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4g1z4v3_

CIRCUIT SPLIT ROUNDUP: This week's edition features cases
decided in March that acknowledge and describe disagreements
in the federal courts of appeals on various questions. . . .
Page 2750

http://pubs.bna.com/ip/BNA/law2.nsf/id/a0a4e8u3n7_

__________
The U.S. Law Week (ISSN 1522-4317) BNA's Highlights are
published weekly by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.,
1231 25th St., N.W., Washington, DC 20037.  For Customer
Service including subscriptions and address changes, call
1-800-372-1033.  For retransmission of the Highlights, more
information or to order full text of summarized stories,
call BNA PLUS at 1-800-452-7773 (202-452-4323 in DC), FAX #
202-822-8092, Internet:bnaplus@bna.com.

Copyright (c) 2001 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Washington, D.C.  20037.  Use of this service is subject to
the terms and conditions of the license agreement with BNA.
Unauthorized access or distribution is prohibited.


Leslie, I'll follow up with Mike McGowan.  Is there an invoice or something
floating around that you are aware of?  Shall we just send to you Tom and
have you get it to the right place?  I'm not sure anyone has been hired yet
to fill Tim's position, but I know that is in progress.  Mike--please give me
a call re: this.  Thanks. DF

Leslie Lawner@EES
08/21/2000 09:13 AM
To: Tom Rutherford <comd3@swcp.com> @ ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Richardson dinner

Drew, Tom has informed me that Enron has never paid for the table that Tim
Aron got for the Secretary Richardson fundraiser (last April) and the tab is
$2500.  I know in hindsight we may not want to give Richardson any money
since he blew his chance at becoming VP (just joking) but we do need to pay.
Tom's email address is above and perhaps he can tell you where to mail the
check.

I also have a couple of other obligations that Tim Aron undertook that I need
to follow up on, has someone been hired, or should I go through you?

Thanks.


Fly me to the moon.


Good Question, it is in addition too the previous volumes.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hyvl, Dan
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:10 AM
To: Wallis, Janet H.
Subject: Re: SWAP

Is this to be in replacement of the amendment I previously drafted or in
addition to the volumes on that amendment?

	Janet H Wallis/ENRON@enronXgate 04/11/2001 11:07 AM 	   To: Patricia
Anderson/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT  Subject: SWAP

Okay, here is the deal
DATE   VOL  SWAP PRICE  ADDER  TOTAL
Jul 01 - Oct 01  525 a day $5.645   $.19  $5.835
Nov 01   875 a day $5.74   $.19  $5.93
Dec 01 - Feb 02  1800 a day $5.81   $.19  $6.00
Mar 02 - June 02 525 a day $ 4.905   $.19  $5.095


One Texas Soldier
A large group of Taliban soldiers  are moving down a road when they hear a
voice call from behind a sand  dune.
"One Texas  soldier is better than ten Taliban".
The Taliban commander quickly orders  10 of his best men over the dune
whereupon a gun-battle breaks out and continues  for a few minutes, then
silence.
The voice once again calls out "One  Texan is better than one hundred
Taliban".  Furious, the Taliban  commander sends his next best 100 troops
over the dune and instantly a huge gun  fight commences. After 10 minutes of
battle, again silence.
The Texan voice calls out again "One  Texan is better than one thousand
Taliban".
The enraged Taliban commander  musters 1000 fighters and sends them to the
other side of the dune. Rifle fire,  machine guns, grenades, rockets and
cannon fire ring out as a terrible battle is  fought....  Then silence.
Eventually one badly wounded Taliban  fighter crawls back over the dune and
with his dying words tells his  commander,  "Don't send any more men......
its a trap.  There's two of  them".
Don't Mess With Texas

Graydon Laguarta
McShane Corporation
2700 Via Fortuna, Suite 301
Austin, Texas   78746
Phone: 512-328-7111
Fax:  512-328-7112
Email:  glaguarta@mcshane.com
Web Site:  McShane.com


thank you very much for th info.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  V Charles Weldon                           08/28/2000 10:54 AM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Shiring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Floating LNG Terminal

Folks,

As a follow-up to Scott Neal's inquiry this morning concerning
portable/floating LNG opportunities for California, I have learned that no
such capability currently exists.
According to Todd Peterson of Enron Global LNG, exploitation of this
opportunity has been the topic of some industry articles but no one, as far
as we know, has
constructed such a vessel.

I did come across a proposed design for an LNG floating terminal by the
Italian company,Tecnomare.   I contacted them and they indicated that  they
have not
built such a vessel.  It is estimated that construction of such a vessel
would take 2-3 years, and as one might imagine, achieving the required
operational and
environmental performance in such a vessel would be quite substantial.
Attached is a link to a relatively brief description of the proposed vessel,
http://www.tecnomare.it/marine/project/ling.htm

Please let me know if any further research is needed.

Charlie Weldon


FYI -- David Leboe in Investor Relations authored the attachment.
-

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2001
03:54 PM ---------------------------
From: Greg Caudell/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/02/2001 01:53 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Check this...

I incorporated some comments and info provided by IR.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000
10:53 AM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
12/22/2000 09:29 AM
To: Pat Arnold/Remote/Eott@Eott, arthuroconnor@juno.com,
bobb.supertravel@wspan.com, audrau@yahoo.com, Memaw1995@aol.com,
Kathy.Crenshaw@inteq.com @ Enron, Kayla Crenshaw/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, kevindrach@houston.rr.com @ ECT, Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON,
jimmywgordon@hotmail.com, Renee Ingram/HOU/ECT@ECT, IMYoars@aol.com,
jmcintyre13@hotmail.com, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leroy
Barnes/Remote/Eott@Eott, Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, obloftmkh@wcnet.net,
emlea@usa.net, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, youens@cyrunner.net, William
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Summers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Thibaut/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rinetia Turner/OTS/Enron@Enron, Laura
Valencia/Corp/Enron@Enron, hmel5345@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Wishing a very Blessed Christmas and a Happy New Year

These are beautiful!

 - Xmas.pps


Mr. Vincent J. Kaminski
Managing Director
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

Dear Mr. Kaminski:

Recently, there has been a lot of discussion and confusion on the
direction of the distributed energy (DE) industry. With the summer stock
price collapse and slow market development, many DE stakeholders are
re-thinking their strategies. Cambridge Energy Research Associates
(CERA) is as well.

In an effort to provide you with the most up-to-date, valued
information, CERA is asking each member of our Distributed Energy
Advisory Service to complete a brief survey so that we may better serve
you.  The survey can be found at the following link:
http://www.cera.com/survey/distributed

This survey is anonymous and all comments are welcome. We plan to
present and discuss the results at our Executive Retreat in Santa Fe,
New Mexico, December 5-7, 2001.

Thank you for your time and we appreciate your input.

Sincerely,

Steven Taub
Director, Distributed Energy

************************************************************
Our relationship with you is very important to us.  Should you
prefer not to receive e-mail notifications from CERA, please send
a reply to this message with "DoNotEmail" as the subject line of
your message. ( mailto:info@cera.com?subject=DoNotEmail )
************************************************************


We have delivered a copy of 2 LNG contracts to Scott Earnest's office
tonight. One is between Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company Limited & Dabhol
Power Company and the other is between Dabhol Power Company and Oman LNG
L.L.C.   I understand the EGEP Legal group (Steve Watson) is currently
working on a third contract but it is not executed at this time. He has
advised that he will forward a copy when it is completed.
---------------------- Forwarded by Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 08:21
PM ---------------------------

Connie Sutton
06/13/2000 05:39 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

I will let you know when I hear something regarding these type of contracts.
---------------------- Forwarded by Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 05:38
PM ---------------------------

Bridgette Anderson @ ENRON

06/13/2000 03:20 PM
To: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

---------------------- Forwarded by Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron on
06/13/2000 04:15 PM ---------------------------

	Rob Walls @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

	06/13/2000 02:22:03 PM

To: Sandeep Katwala, Bridgette Anderson@ENRON, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

Bridgette -

By copy of this message, I have asked Sandeep Katwala (acting general counsel
for Enron India) to help locate these contracts for you.  Let me know if you
need anything else.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/13/2000
02:22 PM ---------------------------

Bridgette Anderson @ ENRON

06/13/2000 02:19 PM
To: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Walls/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

Gentlemen,

I was told that both of you worked on the Dabhol project, so I am hoping that
you can assist me.  As the message below states, I am trying to find
contracts that are related to this project.  Please see below for details.
If it was a mistake to send this message to you, please forward to the
correct individual.

Thank you,
Bridgette
---------------------- Forwarded by Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron on
06/13/2000 02:57 PM ---------------------------

Connie Sutton@ECT
06/12/2000 04:18 PM
To: Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

Can you try to locate a copy of this contract for me.
---------------------- Forwarded by Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000 04:17
PM ---------------------------

Mary Solmonson
06/08/2000 05:05 PM
To: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Looking for some LNG Contracts

Sally and Scott Earnest called this afternoon.  We will be setting up a new
risk book to manage LNG positions on a worldwide basis.  Supposedly, there
are several contracts from the old E.I. entity related to India for LNG.
They may reference Dabhol Power project, fuel management, fuel oil, heating
oil....

Scott desperately needs to get copies of these contracts.  Can you ask around
with some of the contacts you made on your India trip to see if you can find
these and get copies ?


fyi....I'll set up a meeting with this guy.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000
06:32 PM ---------------------------

Kenneth Booi@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/05/2000 05:35 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Cement- a new business opportunity?

Jeff:

CALME's HR advised me that there is no match for my skills and experience in
your business unit.  I spent a great part of my professional career in the
oil & gas business.  Therefore, I have contacted Mike Brown to see if I can
bring value to his team.  I have not gotten any response yet.

As I have about three weeks left to find a position within Enron, I would
like to explore/seek origination opportunities in a totally new area for
Enron:  Cement.  This industry can be transformed to the new economy and
given its size, it may well be a significant income generating market for us
and certainly within a short time another commodity for EnronOnline.

This is new for me but enormously challenging.  I am asking you to give me a
chance to sell this concept to you at your convenience.  I have enclosed a
brief resume for your review.

I look forward to meeting with you.  Thanks, Jeff

ken


---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
02:04 PM ---------------------------

"Heckler, James" <james.heckler@csfb.com> on 09/22/2000 08:04:54 AM
To: "'benjamin.rogers@enron.com'" <benjamin.rogers@enron.com>,
"'don.miller@enron.com'" <don.miller@enron.com>
cc: "Al-Farisi, Omar" <omar.al-farisi@csfb.com>, "Modi, Rishi"
<rishi.modi@csfb.com>
Subject: FW: a few more questions

Ben,

Can we get the answers to these also.

Thanks,
James

-----Original Message-----
From: Iaconetti, Louis
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 8:59 AM
To: Al-Farisi, Omar; Modi, Rishi; Heckler, James
Subject: Fw: a few more questions

Some additional questions.

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Favinger, Thomas <thomas.favinger@neg.pge.com>
To: 'louis.iaconetti@csfb.com' <louis.iaconetti@csfb.com>
Sent: Fri Sep 22 08:41:28 2000
Subject: a few more questions

1) do the capital cost of linears (gas, transmission and system upgrades)
include tax gross ups relating thereto?

2) Is the cost of backup power (for startup and station service) included in
the variable O&M estimate, or is it included in one of the fixed charges.
Please tell us where it is and how much it is expected to be annually?

Thanks.

Thomas G. Favinger
PG&E National Energy Group
7500 Old Georgetown Road
Bethesda, Maryland 20814-6161
Ph 301-280-6231
Fx 301-280-6911

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


Great trip back.  I spent yesterday in Clarksdale Mississippi.  Don't make a
point of spending your vacation there!

Can you email me Glenn's info so I can send him the hard copy?

I enjoyed our time together, and look forward to more adventures.

Kay

Steve Montovano
03/05/2001 08:22 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NJR LOI

Kay - I hope travel back to iah was uneventful.  Please email me a final copy
of the LOI that was eventualy signed by NJR.  Thank you! Steve


Please forward to others who need this information.

As you know, Enron's been involved with a group of business customers, small
customers, labor and enviros trying to hammer out a core/noncore proposal
that would act as a key modification to Edison's MOU with the Governor.

Today, the Assembly leadership released a bill (AB 82XX) that modifies the
MOU but does not follow the core/noncore proposal negotiated by the group.
The bill just came out, is about 80 pages long, and thorough analysis has not
yet been completed.  The URL for the bill is attached.  Based on a meeting
attended this morning in Sacramento,the key features of the bill( which is
attached) are:

Direct Access suspended until 1.1.2003 (suspension presumably effective on
the effective date of the bill)
Transmission sale at 2X book.
Approximately 90% (or greater) of Edison's undercollection absorbed by
customers 20KW and above.
Create a Trust to address the money owed to the generators and offer the
generators 70 cents on the dollar (but does not do away with the suits,
investigations, etc.)
The bill is completely silent regarding who will pay for the DWR contracts
and what the payment structure will look like.

Reaction and Timetable
Very chaotic, with considerable uncertainty about where (if anywhere) the
bill will go, leaving many to believe that bankruptcy remains a strong
possibility.
Business customers (and of course Enron) are strongly opposed
Republicans are strongly opposed
Labor has big problems with the Tx sale unless they get assurances that TX
labor jobs are guaranteed, which is not yet included in the bill
We are working with business to remove the Direct Access suspension
We are also working on the Senate side to attempt to get the Senate to
include Direct Access in their version of the modified MOU, but the Senate
has been more hostile than the Assembly to Direct Access.
Senate Democrats still intend to run a bill that delinks payment of the bonds
to repay General Fund for power already purchased from the DWR contracts.
AB82XX does not address this issue.
Senate Democrats also intend to craft their own version of a "modified MOU."
Word is that the Senate will release their bond language and their "modified"
MOU this weekend or early next week.
The Assembly will hold an "informational" hearing on the bill tomorrow
(Saturday) to get members up to speed
The Assembly will have a committee hearing and vote on the bill on Monday,
with the intent of sending the bill to the full Assembly for a vote on
Tuesday.
The Legsilature is supposed to have a month-long recess beginning Friday,
July 20th, which requires that both the budget and the energy issue get
resolved by then, or suspend the recess and continue working

Will continue to provide updates as events unfold. If folks have additional
comments on the bill, please direct them to Harry Kingerski and Leslie
Lawner, who will ensure that they get into the hands of our lobbyists in
Sacramento.

If there are any questions, my pager is 888.916.7184.

Best,
Jeff
 - abx2_82_bill_20010712_intro.pdf


?
 - 05_09_01ON.xls


Attached is a draft of the turnkey construction contract for your review.

Ron,  As we discussed, Exhibit A - Scope of Work will need to be included.
Please note the following points:

1.  Liquidated Damages - Need to assess a value for these damages.
2.  Force Majeure - This would currently provide EE&CC with relief from the
In-Service Date requirements and consequently, the LDs.  Is this acceptable?
3.  Permitting - Need to specify in Exhibit F, those permits that ENA would
secure, and make EE&CC responsible for any others.
4.  Utility Coordination - Currently this is very generally.  Are there
specific responsibilities that should be stated in this Agreement wrt the
Utility?

Please review with these in mind.  I will be out tommorrow and Friday.  Let's
plan on meeting Monday to discuss the draft.


Dear Errol Mclaughlin,

Thank you for shoppping with 1-800-FLOWERS.COM.

Below is a summary of your order :

Recipient :
September Mclaughlin at:
14025 SW FRWY
STE  505
SUGAR LAND, TX 77478

Order Summary :

Order number        :13726489.
Scheduled Date        : 02/01/01
Product               :   54.99
Service Charge        :    8.99
Tax(where applicable)  :    5.28
Total Charge          :   69.26

If you have any questions, please feel free to email us at
custservice@1800flowers.com, or call our customer service department
toll-free at 1-800-468-1141, 24 Hours a day.

Sincerely,

Meredith McArdle
Customer Satisfaction Manager
1-800-FLOWERS.COM

Valentine's Day is February 14th - and 1-800-FLOWERS.COM is your One Stop
Love Shop! Order a great gift for your special someone from our Valentine's
Day collection! We have everything from the freshest roses and the best
chocolates to romantic gourmet dinners for two!

http://www.1800flowers.com/cgi-bin/800f/collection.pl/psmg/4/0/0/0/0/0


Ben

Roughly speaking if you use absorption chilling, you would save (at max
summer conditions) maybe 1.2 MW per LM or about 2.5% on capacity which would
be nominally a 2.5% improvement in heat rate. To get this you need a source
of steam. For Lowell, we possibly could get steam from UAE (I don't know how
the transaction would work). We would need about 180,000 lb/hr of steam at
least at 15 psig. The chillers would cost about $400,000 total more than the
mechanicals we have discussed.

If UAE can't supply the steam, then we would need small HRSG's behind each
CTG and would most likely also try and steam injection for NOx control. Heat
rate would improve by maybe 6-7%, plant net output would increase by maybe 2
MW per LM. Capital cost would grow by maybe $8,000,000 (this is wild guess,
we did get HRSG quotes for this steam injection/absorption version but have
not done a detailed capex).

Bruce


Attached is my letter and here are the some additional terms -

Seller shall provide informal pricing information to Buyer on a regular
basis.  Buyer and Seller can agree to a mechanism to facilitate this
process.  Pricing for various risk management products can be provided at the
request of the customer.

 Customer will not be exposed to daily prices, even during OFO periods

 Seller can provide accounting services to handle all payables for
transportation capacity and therefore provide a consolidated statement for
gas supply and transportation.

Seller is prepared to work with the Buyer to manage any new acquisitions that
take place during the course of any agreement.  However, Seller maintains the
right to reprice the products and services provided under such agreement if
such acquisition materially affects the scope of the original offer.

They selected a three year deal, however, termination language will need to
be negotiated. We will wait for Mike Grigsby to get back to determine some of
that language.  If they terminate with in one or two years, they will be
required to pay the difference in the demand charge for the period we
provided this service and the $.08.

Please let me know what else I can do to help facilitate this process.

Thanks,

Kim


To All ADS Market Participants:

Please find attached for your review the following documents: "OOS Examples
MP" (Electronic Dispatch of Out-of-Sequence and Out-of-Market Instructions
-- Guide for Market Participants), a proposed ADS Query File Data
Dictionary, and a proposed ADS Download File Data Dictionary.

These three documents attempt to explain how OOS, in-area OOM, and real-time
RMR dispatches will be communicated through ADS.

Note that we are proposing a market sim during the week of 9/24-9/28, and a
rollout to production on 10/12/01.

I will be available in the TSWG meetings to answer any questions, or you can
email comments to me at gford@caiso.com.

 <<OOS examples MP.doc>>  <<ADS Query File Data Dictionary.doc>>  <<ADS
Download File Data Dictionary.doc>>

Greg Ford
California ISO
Market Operations
(916) 351-2344
gford@caiso.com


Sally:

I'm pleased to note that you will once again be my PRC Rep.  Since the time
we talked a couple of weeks earlier in your office, I have rotated out of the
Middle East Development Group as of 10/31/00 and joined Larry Lawyer's
Finance Group in EGM.  I'm really excited about my new rotation.  With
regards to my work over the last 6 months, I'd be happy to give you a
personal account of my achievements at a time convenient to you.  Meanwhile,
should you need any information from my end, pls call me at x-54326.

Regards,

Inderpal


Gary,

Please call Pat Anderson with Southern Union as soon as possible regarding
the info listed below.  She wants to work a fixed price swap for 25% of their
booked volume for July '01 - Oct '02.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001
10:50 AM ---------------------------

"Pat Anderson" <pat.anderson@SOUTHERNUNIONCO.COM> on 04/02/2001 12:39:00 PM
Please respond to "Pat Anderson" <pat.anderson@SOUTHERNUNIONCO.COM>
To: "Darren Farmer" <dfarmer@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Fixed Price Swap profile

[[ ENRON42.XLS : 2599 in ENRON42.XLS ]]

Darren, Thanks for your patience.  Call me when you have the time to go over
this.

Patricia Anderson
512-370-8280
 - ENRON42.XLS


Very interesting.  Quick questions:  1) $100MM come out of our pockets?  2)
Could we "guarantee" 500 MWs?  3) Would we identify and implement DSM at our
customers' sites?

Jeff

	Scott Stoness@EES
	12/20/2000 04:11 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Potential DSM Card to Play

What about offering to creat 500MW of supply in CA  by spending $100m on DSM
in the next 6 months, in exchange for equal treatment DA vs lg customers.

This idea has not been vetted by management or DSM guys, so please don't jump
to it yet.

Scott


I spoke with Jason in credit and he indicated that it does need to be DASHed
due to funding reasons.  Pleaase help the process along by completing the
expediated DASH..

Thanks,

Frank

---------------------- Forwarded by Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron on 01/05/2001
04:01 PM ---------------------------
From: Tanya Rohauer@ECT on 01/05/2001 01:37 PM
To: Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Expedited DASH Process for Prepaid and other Embedded Financings
in Commodity Transactions

The structure is critical. I don't want to cash out the entire fixed price
position and then turn around and sell them index gas at $8.  Then I have a
huge receivable risk that has no MTM offset.  I'd rather reset the fixed
price to somwhere in between, especially if they are hurting for cash.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Frank Hayden @ ENRON                           01/05/2001 12:56 PM

To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Expedited DASH Process for Prepaid and other Embedded Financings
in Commodity Transactions

I'm unclear, but evidently we sold $2 dollar gas to them (back in 1996) and
they are asking to cash out...I think we end up paying them roughly 20
million dollars.  I'll give you better/more details as I learn them.

Frank

To: Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Expedited DASH Process for Prepaid and other Embedded Financings
in Commodity Transactions

Please let me know the nature of the transaction with National Steel.
Thanks!!

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Frank Hayden @ ENRON                           01/05/2001 09:24 AM

To: John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Chip Schneider/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lea
Savala/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Expedited DASH Process for Prepaid and other Embedded Financings in
Commodity Transactions

John,
Thanks for stopping by.  For pre-paids and the like we have an expediated
DASH process.  Since the counterparty is National Steel, we will need to get
credit involved.  I've included Chip on this email regarding costs of funds.

The expediated DASH process is for financings of embedded in commodity
transactions.  This is to ensure that these type of transactions are reviewed
considering funds flow and the ability to syndicate, as well as credit,
documentation, and pricing.  This process is intended to be less
comprehensive than a standard DASH and is to be used only for embedded
financing transactions that are either (i) short- term or (ii) longer-term if
with relatively highly-rated counterparties.

Thanks,

Frank


My suggestion for improving the process within the risk group is to do a
better job of verifying all term deals are coming to the cash desk at mid.

I believe a large improvement can be made in the settlements area.  The forms
are not accurate, the entire support is not attached and the form they are
usign does not properly divide the variance between the three possible areas
causing a variance, desk price, UA4, firm volumes.
PL


Kimberly, I have sent you hard copies of the First and Second Quarter results also viewable via the ETS intranet (marketing).
Thanks
Kim Kouri


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001 07:30
AM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 04/10/2001 07:28:36 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:
Subject: option candlesticks as a hot link 4/10

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Option Candlesticks
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/candlesticks77.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Ron and I discussed your comments. We don't have a problem with a 3-
business day requirement for posting cash collateral nor a 3-business day
requirement for " transfer date" interest posting.

 We have a question into our counsel (who has been out sick) on whether we
need some form of Board approval for posting collateral.

Our main concern (and the reason we would like a 10- business day time
period) is if we choose to provide credit support with a LOC, we don't have
the staffing and bank pre-arrangements to be able to put an LOC in place
within a shorter period. Since we don't currently exchange collateral,
posting a LOC would not be something we do in the normal course of business.
As such, if the need should arise, we would like to have sufficient time to
allow staff to look at our alternatives and provide the form collateral that
best suits the situation.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [SMTP:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 8:47 AM
> To: GRichar@smud.org
> Cc: Tracy.Ngo@enron.com; Stewart.Rosman@enron.com
> Subject: Re: EEI Changes
>
>
> Gary:
> These changes look fine.  I have had further discussions with Tracy on
> this
> 10 day issue and we have a change that we would like to make. We would
> like
> to add language that would require SMUD within 3 Business Days of our
> collateral request to send us an Officer's Certificate certifying that
> Board Approval is required in order to post the collateral requested.  If
> no approval is required, we feel that the extension of time is not
> necessary.  Also, if you are posting cash,  should the extension apply?
> If
> so, why?
>
> Also, I still don't understand why the 10 day requirement should apply to
> the "Transfer Date" concept which only requires the non-posting party to
> pay the posting party interest each month on cash collateral that has been
> posted.  Please explain.
>
>
> Carol St. Clair
> EB 3889
> 713-853-3989 (Phone)
> 713-646-3393 (Fax)
> carol.st.clair@enron.com
>
>
>
>
>                     Gary
>
>                     Richardson           To:     "'Carol St. Clair'"
> <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>, "'Tracy Ngo
>                     <GRichar@smud        (Enron)'" <Tracy.Ngo@enron.com>
>
>                     .org>                cc:     Ron Jelicich
> <RJelici@corporate.smud.org>
>                                          Subject:     EEI Changes
>
>                     05/15/2001
>
>                     06:03 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I made changes to  (h) Sections 8.1 (c) and 8.2 (c) changing the days for
> providing Performance Assurance form 3 to 10. I also changed (i)
> "Downgrade
> Event "  to 10 days to make it consistent with (j).
>
>  <<SMUD Redline EEI (5.15.01).doc>>
>
> (See attached file: SMUD Redline EEI (5.15.01).doc)
>  << File: SMUD Redline EEI (5.15.01).doc >>


Bob --

Where do we stand on the SCE stipulation?  I want to make sure that our push in SCE doesn't conflict or contradict something we are doing in the PG&E discussions.

Can we meet today?

Jim


I was asked whether TW could install a stand-by compressor unit at the Gallup
station in the event the unit was down due to scheduled or unscheduled
maintenance.

All interstate pipelines with a blanket certificate are authorized to
install, operate, and remove "temporary" compression provided the temporary
facilities are not used to increase the volume or service above that rendered
by existing permanent unit(s). Temporary compression installed under this
authority can only be used when permanent horsepower is down for scheduled or
unscheduled maintenance.  I have reviewed this issue with legal and we agree
that stand-by compression would qualify under the "temporary compression"
regulations.

This authorization is restricted to the cost limitations of the automatic
blanket certificate of $7.3MM in 2000 (this includes the costs to acquire the
unit).   The cost limits under the blanket certificate are increased each
year.  Generally, the new limits are published in February an increase
approx. $100,000 each year).  Further, the certificate requires that the
"temporary facilities" meet a 55 dBA Ldn noise standard.

Please coordinate the installation of any temporary compression with the
certificate department .  Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks MW


agreed
these are just swaps that settle last day

dutch

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Ryan Goldwire" <ryang@amerexenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 12:17 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	2 deals

Dutch-2 deals

1.    f2 2.63 last  day    enron sells to western        enron buys from tenaska     68/mo

2.    f3 3.45 last  day    enron sells to tenaska         enron buys from western      25/mo

thanks

Ryan


lumber


Dear U2 Fan,

As promised there are new developments coming onto the site regularly at
present.

Just up we have an exclusive U2.COM animated screensaver, featuring clips
from tracks off All That You Can't Leave Behind.

We've also just posted The Oracle, which promises answers to everything you
ever needed to know about U2. Sort of! Just key in your question and you'll
be surprised at the answer you get. It's Surreal Thing!

We're still running our competition to win a signed set of every U2 album on
vinyl and there's also a few days left to vote for your favourite track from
BOY - before we open the voting on the favourite track on another U2 album.

In January we'll be posting the first information on the new U2 tour - and
we'll e-mail you immediately the information is public.

Best wishes
u2.com

www.U2.com is powered by WorldOnline.com


noted

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:50 AM
To:	Concklin, Elaine; Saunders, James
Subject:	RE: Andersen Oil & Gas Symposium

Just forget about it, the company will not be reimbursing for attendance this year.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Concklin, Elaine
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 1:28 PM
To:	Saunders, James
Cc:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	RE: Andersen Oil & Gas Symposium

I wonder if the person you spoke with is aware of the previous arrangements.  Do you get the funny feeling they are trying to distance themselves from us ???  Here is the excerpt from the original Enron invitation.  I have been attending these since the early nineties, and Enron has always been discounted 50%.  Even the full price they quoted you contradicts the October 12th memo that quotes a full price of $950:

Once again, due to the level of Enron 's attendance, we have arranged to
facilitate you or your group's registration.  If you would like to register
or would like more information, please contact Sabrina Whaley at 646-6340
by November 5, 2001.  A copy of the Symposium agenda has been attached for
your review.  The registration fee is $950 per person; however we offer all
Enron personnel wanting to attend a 50% discount.  All billing arrangements
will be made through Bob Butts.

For $1,200, I will cancel my reservations.

Thanks for checking.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Saunders, James
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 9:55 AM
To:	Campos, Kathy; Daily, Pamela; Peters, Jerry; Geaccone, Tracy; Brassfield, Morris; Barnes, Caroline; Jesse III, John; Borcyk, David; Cherry, Paul; Konsdorf, Ellen; Chandler, Bob; Cobb Jr., John; Wiederholt, Patricia; Fancler, Dan; Lev, Jennifer; Sutton, Lisa; Gilbert, Steve; Keiser, John; Centilli, James; Rosenberg, David E.; Tu, Denis; Brasher, Barney; Clements, David; Concklin, Elaine; Stern, Ellis; Ratner, Michael; Chavez, Gabriel; Gonzalez, Martin; Lee, Jebong; Schroeder, Maggie
Cc:	Guthrie, Robert; Rice, Greek; Schick, Warren; Tilotta, Robert W; Svatos, Dee; Jolibois, Anne; Mayes, Cynthia; Schaffer, Brian; Jones, Dana; Sullivan, Michael; Baker, Lee; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Andersen Oil & Gas Symposium

After Rod's staff mtg. on Friday, we followed up w Andersen on attendance discounts related to the above annual meeting (12/4 and 5).
Andersen indicated no discount...interested attendees would have to pay full amount, $1200.


Cara,

   Thanks a lot for the detail error report.
   Actually to me is enough to see the selection screen and the numbers of
the deals
   which are missing or are extra on the report.

   1) I can see that you are running the older version of the report, because
there is selection
for Approval on the screen. Probably is our mistake. The shortcut does not
update the new
version. You need to run the STAGE Enpower launchpad with all the buttons at
first which
will copy the new version of Forward Obligation from the server to your local
computer
at first and then to run the shortcut.

  2) I run the newer version here, I can see the parts of the deals 503112
and 503107
which you have highlited and the region totals were zero's. You can verify it.

 3) We just released a new version to stage, which should have the same
reasults, but we
did some optimizations, we intend to reduce the speed soon.
The version number is 3.0.0.36, you can see it when you run the report or
click Help-About.
Until you don't see that number there is no use to continue testing, on any
problem
call David Poston

    Thanks,
    Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Semperger, Cara
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Symes, Kate; Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Test of Forward Obligation

Good Morning,

I ran the new report against production, using the shortcut provided for me.
My results are innacurate because some transmission deals are not showing.
The strange thing is that there is no real pattern as to why some
transmission deals show and some don't.

I compared the forward ob to scheduling.   You might want to do that
comparison for yourself there.  Also, checking the Real-Time position manager
as well will help.

Please see this power point document.

 << File: fwdob_vs_sched_322.ppt >>


I think we will get alot of "don't knows" when we ask the questions about what the respondent's companies are doing.  We can probably find a better tool than a survey to get at that infromation.  I'm not opposed to including those questions if you think we will get useful data, but I raise the issue in case there are other questions you mihgt want to ask but didn't have time for.

 I don't think we will be able to categorize customers in terms of whether they are lapsed, current or prospective.  That information is kept on an inconsistent and decentralized basis in the company.

Finally, given Enron's focus on the day-to-day, I wouldn't count to heavily on getting alot of help putting together the stakeholder sample.  You should have a back-up plan.

Thanks for the opportunity to comment.  I am very much looking forward to reviewing the results.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McKalip-Thompson, Catherine
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 7:31 PM
To:	Terraso, Michael; Kean, Steven J.; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Cc:	Kimberly, Kelly; Walker, Stacy; McVicker, Maureen
Subject:	Enron Stakeholder Perception Survey Questionnaire - for review

Steve, Mike and Mark,

As you know, the Corporate Responsibility group has commissioned a survey of Enron's stakeholders to gauge their opinions on corporate social responsibility and how they perceive Enron in that regard (along with comparison companies so it will not be obvious that it is Enron that has commissioned the survey.)  Lists of stakeholders to be surveyed have been compiled with the help of various corporate and business unit staff to get to a sample of 100 (50 companies,  25 government/regulators, 10 non-governmental organizations, and 15 from media, finance and academia).

The survey questionnaire is attached below.  It was written for the company respondents, with some adjustments for government, NGO and others in bold pink font.  Kelly suggested that the questionnaire would benefit from your review.  Please provide me your comments, or any questions, by Monday, September 24.

Thank you,
Catherine

Catherine McKalip-Thompson
Manager, Corporate Environmental Responsibility
Enron Corp.
Tel: 415-782-7842
Fax: 415-782-7854

 << File: ENRON_external_questionnaireDraft.0918.doc >>


Jeff,

My name is Kurt Lindahl.  I recently joined Enron Global Markets on the LNG
team.  I'm the Lead Developer for the West Coast and have been charged with
building a (several) LNG terminal(s) on the west coast.  Michael McGarry,
from Enron Engineering and Operational Services Company, is the lead
Development Engineer on the project.

A key question in this effort is, "Where is the best entry point into the
Socal/SG&E/PG&E pipeline systems.  In other words, where can we site a LNG
terminal and deliver natural gas into their systems, such that the amount of
facilities they require is minimal?  I spoke with Ben Asante who heads up the
optimization department in ETS.  He said that if we could get annual flow
diagrams for the California intrastate systems, he could prepare a model in
about 2 weeks time.  Interstate pipelines have to file Annual Flow Diagrams
at FERC, but I'm not sure what Intrastates' are obligated to file with the
CPUC?  That's where I need your help.  This is a hot subject, because the
race to site an LNG terminal is intense.

Could you please call me at 713 345 5044 (O) or 713 515 2759 so that we can
discuss.  We want to keep this effort very confidential, so please maintain
secrecy.

I will also want to talk to you about permitting and state approvals.

Regards,

Kurt Lindahl


Sure--frankly I thought that we were covered.  Bill Bradford gave me the list
of invitees from credit.  Julia

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street, EB3838
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com

	Tana Jones@ECT
	05/15/2001 04:39 PM

		 To: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Letter of Credit Seminar - May 23, 2001

Would it be possible to ask some key people from our Credit Dept. to attend
this semiar?

	Julia Murray@ENRON
	Sent by: Carolyn George@ENRON
	05/15/2001 03:59 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne
C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Lowry/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J
Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurie
Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Blaine/ENRON@enronXgate, Gail
Brownfeld/ENRON@enronXgate, Dominic Carolan/Enron@EnronXGate, Eddy
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Roseann
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Lindeman/ENRON@enronXgate, Carlos
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Goode/NA/Enron@Enron, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martha
Braddy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Sarah
Bruck/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, William S
Bradford/Enron@EnronXGate, Debbie R Brackett/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom
Moran/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendi LeBrocq/Enron@EnronXGate, Nidia
Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Veronica Espinoza/Enron@EnronXGate, Ken
Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, Carol North/Enron@EnronXGate, Aparna
Rajaram/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: Letter of Credit Seminar - May 23, 2001

 Please mark your calendars.  Emory Ireland and Martin Weinstein of Foley &
Lardner will be conducting a presentation regarding the nuts and bolts of
Letters of Credit on Wednesday, May 23, 2001 from 8:45 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. in
EB5C2.  Please RSVP to Carolyn George at ext. 33439 or
carolyn.george@enron.com if you plan to attend.

Thank you,

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street, EB3838
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com


Attached is my procedural draft to accounting on how to calculate MCF WACOG.
Let me know your comments by the close of business on May 12th.


Jeff,
Below is an email from John.  Please let me know how to respond.  I know you
guys talked about this.  Thor was in the loop here wasn't he?  I know we took
out the Thor reporting piece but in reality they do report up through him.
How many people do we expect in London?  John and I did talk about this and I
didn't really think of it lately.

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
09:59 AM ---------------------------

John Sherriff
12/19/2000 01:29 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Organizational Announcement - revised comments

After re-reading your note - I see that it is not a trading desk in London
but a marketing desk
- but it is still unclear to me how this fits into the Oslo desk.  Also
shouldn't we be talking about this or your
guys talking to Thor who is running the European Weather business?

John

---------------------- Forwarded by John Sherriff/LON/ECT on 19/12/2000 07:31
---------------------------

John Sherriff
19/12/2000 06:25
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Organizational Announcement

I thought we had specifically agreed that we were not adding a market making
function in London!  If you
have got traders to spare I can use about six of them.

John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Sherriff/LON/ECT on 19/12/2000 06:28
---------------------------
   Enron Global Markets LLC - Office of the Chairman

From: Enron Global Markets LLC - Office of the Chairman@ENRON on 18/12/2000
21:21 CST
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Enron Wholesale Services
cc:
Subject: Organizational Announcement

Enron Global Markets (EGM) has made numerous organizational changes as its
businesses continue to grow and expand around the world.  We are pleased to
announce the following changes within EGM.

Financial Trading
The Convertible Arbitrage desk has moved from EnronCredit.com to the
Financial Trading group under Gary Hickerson.  Mike Bradley will manage the
desk.

Billy Lemmons has joined Gary Hickerson's group from EIM.  He is exploring
the agriculture value chain and origination opportunities.

Transportation and Shipping
Dan Reck will be transitioning out of the coal group and will be exploring
our rail and trucking initiatives.  These markets together represent
approximately $105 billion notionally, and we believe there are many
synergies between our energy, coal, and freight trading businesses.

Enron is currently trading dry-freight through EOL and is a leading market
maker in this new product. The shipping business is growing very quickly.  We
have asked Pierre Aury and Scott Montcrief to co-lead our worldwide vessel
trading businesses.  Scott will be responsible for all liquids vessel
businesses and Pierre will manage all dry vessel businesses.  The LNG vessel
business currently managed by Wayne Perry will remain in the LNG group, but
will also report to and coordinate with Pierre and Scott.

Weather
Our worldwide weather operations will continue to report to Mark Tawney in
Houston.  This business, which includes trading weather products in 10
countries and 40 states in the U.S., is also rapidly expanding.  Mark will
have all V@R allocation responsibility between Sydney, Tokyo, Oslo, and
Houston.  In addition we will be forming a weather-marketing desk in London.

Crude and Products
Bill White will be coming over from EBS and will have responsibility for all
U.S. financial crude trading.  Don Schroeder will continue to have oversight
and lead our physical crude business.  Mario De La Ossa has joined EGM from
Equiva and will manage our product options book.

Doug Leach will be expanding his fuel management and origination role.  He
will report directly to John Nowlan.

Finance and Structuring
Andrew Makk has joined the finance team from the Middle East group.  Most
recently he has been working on the Gaza project.

Jim Lewis has also joined this team. His last assignment was leading the
structuring group for CALME.

Both Andrew and Jim will report to Larry Lawyer.

Corporate Development
Mark Wadlington has joined the EGM team and will be managing this activity
and co-ordinating with all Enron Corp. He reports to Tim Detmering with
accountability to the office of the chairman of EGM.

Operations and Accounting
Todd Hall has expanded his role as Business Controller and will have
responsibility for coal and weather.

Mike Perun has joined Enron from the banking industry and is responsible for
Controls & Standards.  He will focus on EGM,s operational and accounting
processes on a global basis.  He reports to Brent Price.

The Ecoelectrica power plant in Puerto Rico will move reporting
responsibility into the Enron Global Assets group.  Greg Curran, who is
responsible for all the activities in Puerto Rico, will report to that group
on all Ecoelectrica business and to Enron Global Markets on the remaining
businesses.

Please join us in congratulating everyone in their new roles.


Forgot to copy you on the original dist.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000 05:39 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	07/26/2000 05:38 PM

		 To: Michael J Legler/HOU/ECT
		 cc: Chris Hilgert/HOU/ECT@ect
		 Subject: Term Sheet

Attached is my draft revised term sheet for the producer purchase
agreements.  Let me know if you have any comments.


The following file contains a graphical view of the North American Gas
average deal count by Trader and Product for EOL. This information is for
comparative analysis only.  Do not update links when opening this file.

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please let me know .

Thanks,
Adam Johnson
x54877
EnronOnline


Contact:  Jackie Martin x53563
Breakfast @ 7:30a.m., Meeting starting @ 8:00 a.m.


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                NOVEMBER 21, 2001

Notice ID: 3289
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT:  REVISED - TCO CAPACITY UPDATE EFFECTIVE FOR MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26,
2001

                 CHANGES ARE INDICATED WITH AN *

Effective Monday, November 26, 2001, capacities will be as follows:

Excess MDWQ              Available +
ISS Withdrawals          Available
SIT Withdrawals          Available
Imbalance Drawdowns      Available

Excess MDIQ              NOT Available +
ISS Injections           NOT Available
SIT Injections           NOT Available
Imbalance Paybacks       NOT Available

PAL Lends/Unparks        Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks  NOT Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Non-firm receipt capacity will be as follows:

TENNESSEE:

Brinker (B12)            20,000
Broad Run (B9)          450,000
Cambridge (B10)               0
Dungannon (B11)          20,000
Highland (B17)                0
Milford (B18)            20,000
North Greenwood (B22)         0
Unionville (B15)         50,000

TEXAS EASTERN:

Delmont (C16)            10,000
Eagle (C22)              20,000
Hooker (C9)              20,000
Pennsburg (C23)          20,000
Windridge (C12)          20,000

NATIONAL FUEL:

Independence (M1)             0
Ellwood City (L1)        15,000

TRANSCO:

Downingtown (E3)          2,500
Emporia I (E13)          60,000
Rockville (E2)           60,000
Dranesville (E1)         50,000

The restriction of 0 non firm has been lifted.  *

EQUITABLE GAS:

Hi Hat (F3)                    *

KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA (KYWV):

Beaver Creek (H1)              *

CNR PIPELINE:

Boldman (CNR02)                *
Conoway (CNR03)                *
Johns Creek (CNR08)            *
Canada (CNR09)                 *
Canada (CNR10)                 *
Stafford (CNR11)               *
Thacker/Majestic (CNR12)       *
Briar Mtn. (CNR13)             *
Huff Creek (CNR14)             *

CONOCO:
Grant (P1)                     *

Wiser (827280)                0
Delta Natural Gas (819288)    0

ALGONQUIN:

Ramapo (R1)              25,000

ANR:

Paulding/Cecil           30,000
(F1, A2)

LEBANON AGGREGATE       100,000
(A4, F2, C4, D3)

TOLEDO AGGREGATE        100,000
(A3, F4, 734462)

COLUMBIA GULF:
(801)

TCO-Leach               700,000

Internal point non-firm capacity will be as follows:

Lanham                        0

Delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

TRANSCO:

Martins Creek            10,000
  (MLI E5)
Young Woman's Creek      10,000
  (MLI E9)

ALGONQUIN:

Hanover                       0
  (MLI R2)

EQUITRANS:

Fallen Timber            31,000
  (MLI K1)

Waynesburg-Rhinehart     20,000
  (MLI K2)

OPT-30 will be available in all market areas.
OPT-60 will be available in all market areas.

Market Area delivery capacity (non-firm) will be as follows:

Operating Area 1
     Market Area 33      30,000
     Market Area 34      20,000

Operating Area 2
     Market Area 20       No Restrictions

Operating Area 3
     Market Area 15       No Restrictions
     Market Area 16       No Restrictions
     Market Area 17       No Restrictions
     Market Area 18       No Restrictions
     Market Area 19       No Restrictions

Operating Area 4
     Market Area 21      10,000
     Market Area 22      10,000
     Market Area 23      20,000
     Market Area 24      10,000
     Market Area 25       No Restrictions
     Market Area 29       No Restrictions

Operating Area 5
     Market Area 02       No Restrictions
     Market Area 07       No Restrictions

Operating Area 6
     Market Area 10       No Restrictions
     Market Area 11       No Restrictions
     Market Area 12       No Restrictions
     Market Area 13       No Restrictions
     Market Area 14       No Restrictions

Operating Area 7
     Market Area 01       No Restrictions
     Market Area 03       No Restrictions
     Market Area 04       No Restrictions
     Market Area 05       No Restrictions
     Market Area 06       No Restrictions
     Market Area 08       No Restrictions
     Market Area 09       No Restrictions

Operating Area 8
     Market Area 26       No Restrictions
     Market Area 27       No Restrictions
     Market Area 32       No Restrictions
     Market Area 35       No Restrictions
     Market Area 36       No restrictions for southern part of Market Area 36.
                          Primary receipts/deliveries only for gas delivered
                          in the northern portion of Market Area 36.
     Market Area 38       No Restrictions
     Market Area 39       No Restrictions
     Market Area 40       No Restrictions

NOTE:  GAS DELIVERED IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF MARKET AREA 38 OR THE NORTHERN
PORTION OF MARKET AREA 36 MUST BE RECEIVED FROM TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE AT
HIGHLAND.

Operating Area 10
     Market Area 28       No Restrictions
     Market Area 30       No Restrictions
     Market Area 31       No Restrictions

If you have any questions, please contact your Account
Representative.


With regard to the Commission's limitations on the right of first refusal,
Order 637 provides for grandfathering of discounted long-term contracts that
are now subject to ROFR.  The Commission's rationale was that grandfathering
gives all shippers notice of the new limitation and the opportunity to
re-execute current contracts.  The TW Commercial Group has asked whether we
should challenge the grandfathering of existing contracts.  In limiting the
right of first refusal, the Commission has expressly acknowledged that if a
customer is truly captive and has no alternatives for service, it is likely
that its contract will be at the maximum rate.  Shippers that are not captive
and have alternatives in the marketplace do not need the protection of ROFR,
and the pipeline should be able to negotiate with other interested shippers
upon expiration of the contract.

In light of these conclusions, there should be no reason to grandfather the
ROFR rights of shippers under existing discounted contracts.  Such shippers
would not be harmed by removal of the right immediately upon the effective
date of a pipeline's tariff filing to limit the right of first refusal
(assuming the service contract incorporates tariff terms on an "as amended"
basis).  Consistent with the Commission's order, it would not be unfair to
make these shippers compete with others for the capacity upon expiration of
the contract.


Newport Beach April 18-19?
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 02:56 PM -----

	"Patricia Young" <PYoung@eei.org>
	Sent by: bounce-contract-9369@ls.eei.org
	03/05/2001 12:59 PM
	Please respond to "Wholesale Electric Contract Standardization Group"

		 To: "Wholesale Electric Contract Standardization Group" <contract@ls.eei.org>
		 cc:
		 Subject: POWER MARKETING TRANSACTIONS WORKSHOP

 The Edison Electric Institute presents a timely and topical workshop:
*Power Marketing Transactions Using Master Contracts to Mitigate Risk* at the
Four Seasons Hotel, Newport Beach, California on April 18-19, 2001.
Join the developers of the EEI Master Contract and the Western Systems Power
Pool Agreement in a one-day workshop devoted to managing power marketing
risks using these agreements.
We promise the lights will be on!
Program Highlights:
Becky A. Kilbourne, formerly with the California Power Exchange offers her
observations on the *California Meltdown* and presents a new paradigm for
electricity markets.
Marvin J. Goldstein, Partner, Stroock, Stroock & Lavan, explains how to
protect yourself in the event of a counter-party bankruptcy.
Join us for a Welcoming Reception at 6:30 pm on the evening of April 18th and
after the Workshop on the 19th , join members of EEI*s Legal Committee at
6:30 pm for the Welcoming Reception for the Spring 2001 Legal Committee
Conference.
The entire Workshop, Agenda and registration information are attached
(PDF-ADOBE) for further information.
 - TEXT.htm
 - brochurenewport.pdf


Ian,

I shall come to Wharton on Thursday, June 14,
meeting with Howard Kunreuther.

I shall ask my assistant to forward you my itinerary.
I shall also register for the October Conference.
Thanks for reminding me.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"MacMillan, Ian" <macmilli@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22MacMillan+2C+20Ian+22+20+3Cmacmilli+40wharton+2Eupenn+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 6:48 AM
To:	'vkamins@enron.com'
Cc:	Rita Mcgrath (E-mail); Boisot, Max
Subject:	Strategic Management Society Conference

A couple of months ago you agreed to serve on a panel on real options that Rita McGrath at Columbia had assembled.
We have been informed that you have not registered for the conference - in SFO October 21 to 24
Can you please register - they are getting antsy about it.  Go to sms@mgmt.purdue.edu
When are you due at Wharton again?


Attached please find the most recent version of the CA Development I
Agreement and Exhibits as well as a blackline against the version
circulated on December 4.  I will be forwarding to Kay Mann the
execution copy that will incorporate both the agreement and exhibits
into one document, which will also include Exhibit H-2.
<<CA Energy Development Agt - Comparison v. 2 to 4.DOC>>  <<CA
Development I Exhibits Comparison v 1 to 3.DOC>>  <<Exhibits to CA
Development I Energy Break-Out Agreement CISO1 12/15/00.DOC>>  <<break
out agreement for CIS01 (12/20/00).DOC>>
 - CA Energy Development Agt - Comparison v. 2 to 4.DOC
 - CA Development I Exhibits Comparison v 1 to 3.DOC
 - 00.DOC
 - 00).DOC


Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Global Finance
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas  77002

713/345-7723 (phone)
713/853-9252 (fax)
E-mail:  nora.dobin@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron on 12/21/2000 01:46 PM -----

	Nora Dobin
	10/19/2000 05:53 PM

		 To: Ross Mesquita/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Suresh Raghavan/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: DealBench -- Phone Backup for Auctions

Some initial thoughts on the referenced subject:

(1) Phone Backup

 Calls should be scripted (to extent possible), fully recorded and User
advised upfront that the conversation is being recorded.   Possible
participants in call include User, Deal Manager and DealBench.  Risk that
recording fails or is faulty allocated to User and/or Deal Manager.
DealBench/Deal Manager representatives should be trained in any unscripted
topics permissible for discussion and possibly provided list thereof for
reference during call.  No auction/deal information should be given phone
participants that is not available to electronic participants.

(2) Authentication

 How establish identity of authorized User--i.e., one who Deal Manager has
invited to participate?  Possibility:  User calls in during auction
explaining unable to access site.  DealBench/Deal Manager calls User back at
number given in DealBench registration information.  Person answering must
give name of registered DealBench User and Deal Key number for subject
auction.  User and/or Deal Manager assumes risk that person conducting
business over phone for User is not authorized.

(3) Auction Information

 How share with User participating by phone the information available to
on-line participants?   Possibility:  DealBench/Deal Manager recite low bid,
high bid and/or spread, as applicable, as of specified time.  User and/or
Deal Manager must assume risk of bid misquotes.

 How share with on-line participants bids from phone participants?
Possibility:  DealBench/Deal Manager enter phone bids into auction site as
soon as possible after receipt.  User and/or Deal Manager must assume risks
of bid misentries and tardiness of bid entries into DealBench.

(4) Timing

 How manage and time receipt and input of phone bids vis a vis electronic
bids and auction deadlines to maximize fairness to all participants?  Risk
allocated to User and/or Deal Manager.

(5) Confirmation/Proof/Records

 Need to consider procedures to confirm and establish binding effect of phone
bids (changes to Site Access and Site License Agreements can be part of
this).  Also need to establish  record maintenance regarding phone
transactions.  Will phone conversations be transcribed?  Would both recording
and transcription be maintained, and if so, for how long?  Will written
confirmation of phone transactions be provided to User?  How do our trading
operations handle proof, confirmation and records regarding phone
transactions?  Note that record maintenance generally remains an open
DealBench operational/legal issue.

(6) Unavailability of Phone Backup System

 Allocate this risk to User and/or Deal Manager.  Unavailability of phone
backup system could be attributable to numerous factors such as phone line
problems on either end, high volume of phone-ins and related lack of
personnel.

(7) Volume

 How manage a high volume of phone participants?  How manage simultaneous
high volume of phone participants and high volume of auctions?  Issues
include availability of sufficient reliable human resources, reliable
physical resources (phone banks and electronic hookups to DealBench),
tracking and timely sharing of current bid information with phone and
electronic participants, and timely input of phone bids into DealBench.

(8) Deadlines

 How establish outside time deadline for auction process involving both phone
and electronic participants?

(9) Agreements

 Site Access Agreement and Operations provisions of Site License Agreements
need to be changed to accommodate backup procedures for auctions, binding
effect of phone participation, and related risk allocations.

I look forward to discussing this subject and further action items with you.
Regards, NJD


The following original documents, received today, have been forwarded for your immediate attention:

Dennis Floyd Keiffer - DOL: 2/22/01.  LETTER DATED 10/16/01 RE UNDERINSURED MOTORIST CLAIM to Enron Corp. (NEPCO employee per Rob Cole) by regular mail on 10/22/01.

PLEASE ADVISE IF NOT RECEIVED WITHIN 1 BUSINESS DAY.

Thank you !!

Becky A. Stephens
Support Services Coordinator
Enron Litigation Unit, EB4809
713/853-5025
713/853-6576 (fax)
Becky.Stephens@enron.com


Here's the agreement to use if your shippers want ROFR.


I'm just going to leave this deal with "New Counterparty" for the time being.
I had changed it to Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc., but it sounds like there
may be a problem with this name. Please let me know what I can do to help
this along, or give me a call when a decision is reached.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
04/12/2001 11:48 AM
To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Industries

Sam, Please contact this CP (info on Kate's previous email) or find the dba
information online with D&B or Lexis Nexis so that we can get the true
lowdown on this name.  I don't think we should take the trader's information
as gospel, for as you know, they are not always accurate.  Please let me know
as soon as you get this information.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001
01:45 PM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                04/12/2001 01:26 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Industries

Looks like we might have to modify this name in EnPower after all - The dba
on our master agreement is "Sierra Pacific Industries" with no "Inc." at the
end. I just spoke with Bob Ellery over at Sierra, and he confirmed that,
although the company is a corporation, they never use "Inc." in their
contracts. Thus, our confirm letters would not match up with the master
agreement because of those three pesky letters.

Just let me know if this causes a problem for either of you. In case you'd
like to reference it, the deal number we're attempting to modify is 573679 -
it's a buy from Sierra done by Chris Foster on the 10th of April.

Thanks again for all your help.
Kate
503-464-7486


It was very small and petty of me, but I couldn't resist.  Start with the
last message and work your way up to get the full story.

Good luck studying,
Susan

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 02:20
PM ---------------------------

Susan M Scott
11/27/2000 01:54 PM
To: Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hind-sight's 20/20

Although, as a women, "cojones" aren't necessarily the best attribute to
have...there never has been, nor will there ever be a question of my
possessing them - even you would have to concede that much.  As for the bet,
if I recall correctly (and I always do) someone once said they had a little
bit of a "problem" gambling and I could not in good conscious have acted as
an enabler.  And, a true fan (longhorn or not) is there through the good
times and the bad and believe me I been there through it all (a degrading
loss to your alma mater, as well as an unbelievably beautiful victory over
Nebraska) always managing to stick it out no matter how bleak things got.
Speaking of which it must sting being beat by the last place team in your
conference...but I'm sure the Pac-10's record against non-conference
opponents is really helping to ease that blow.  Speaking of feather's in the
conference cap, looks like our next national champion is going to be from the
Big 12 - will wonders never cease.

My Monday is going great, thank you very much and I will show extreme
restraint and refrain from any Chips comments ( Besides, I don't have time to
type that much ).  UCLA could stand a chance next year if the NFL doesn't
prove too tempting to some of your vets...how does that saying go,  "Like
rats fleeing a sinking ship?"

Ted Noble
11/27/2000 01:18 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hind-sight's 20/20

This email would have been impressive if you had the "cojones" to bet
up-front but being a true longhorn fan explains your lack of spine.  I don't
think Texas is that good rather A&M is that bad.  Besides, we all know that
the Pac-10 had the best record against non-conference opponents.  UCLA will
dominate next year and Texas will be forced to play second fiddle to the
likes of Oklahoma, Nebraska, Kansas State etc.  yet again.  I hope your
Thanksgiving went well and you had some fun in Austin.  I will give you
credit on one thing, the vest is a no-no and my days of playing Chip are over
(the vest is being given to an aggie - those cult like people).  No old age
references to the show Chips because that would just be mean.  I hope your
Monday is going well.

ps: I was rooting for the Longhorns and I am glad they waxed the Aggies.

Susan M Scott
11/27/2000 11:42 AM
To: Ted Noble/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hind-sight's 20/20

Well, given the impressive results of Friday's game, I suppose I should've
taken the bet...I mean I knew we were good, but I didn't realize we were THAT
good.  Watching the game I couldn't help but remember some comments made not
too long ago about this being a building season and that the Horns would be a
force to be reckoned with come the next two seasons - - I love it when I'm
right.  With an increasingly more confident sophomore quarterback leading the
charge and three (count them three) very mature freshman receivers all eager
to make big plays, not to mention last year's top quarterback recruit Chance
Mock serving as a back-up, next season promises to be something to watch.  My
condolences on your prospects not looking quite as bright .

Hope you had a nice Thanksgiving and good luck helping all of your Aggie
co-workers through this trying time.

Susan

(Oh and Chip, I'd store the Gig'em sweater-vest away for the next 360 days or
so if you want to avoid any post-game ridicule...in a round about way you are
an "Ag" man now.)


I've already done the usual.  As I told you before, we don't have the tapes here.  You make the decision if you want to order them for the $40 spread.  Still working on the other deals you asked about.  The answers are out of my realm, so I have an appointment with Risk to find out what's happening and why we're seeing things 'calc'd' at the apparent correct price when they are in EnPower at an incorrect price.

Virginia

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams III, Bill
Sent:	Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	Thompson, Virginia
Subject:	RE: please check

We could pull tapes?  Ask the person who did the deal?  There is nothing in notebooks.  Any word on the BOM PMA?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Virginia
Sent:	Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Cc:	Symes, Kate
Subject:	FW: please check

Bill-

  Can you think of any other means to find out if this deal that we have in the system is good?

  Virginia

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Virginia
Sent:	Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Robinson, Rhonda; Williams, Gwendolyn
Cc:	Clemons, Amy; Sims, Paul; Lew, Elsie; Confer, Mark; Hyde, Godfrey; Werner, Joy
Subject:	please check

Dear Settlements Coordinators,

  I'd like to ask a favor...
  Could you guys please check your counterparties to see if anyone has a dispute on 3-14-01 regarding a purchase or sale of 40 MW at HE 3?

   Sincere thanks,

  Virginia


Ina, will you have the IT group order and install Socal Gasslect and Passport
on my desktop and laptop pc?

Thank you,
Mike


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
12/5/00 MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
12/5/00 MANAGEMENT-GAS 3595275.
12/5/00 MANAGEMENT-PWR 339919.
12/5/00 AGG-MANAGEMENT 3768435.


Just thought I would drop everyone a note to let them know that my
wife(Heather),,,,, is Pregnant!!!!!!!...... We've known for a while, but
decided to wait till after the first tri-mester to tell..... We are both VERY
excited!    She is due mid October....Also,  we just purchased a house.....
our new address is:

Mike & Heather Carson
4114 Riley
Houston, TX 77005

giddy up!

MC


In a absolutely dead tech market, two of the EBS portfolio companies announced they were being acquired today.  StorageApps is being acquired by Hewlett Packard for $350 million, and Amber Networks is being acquired by Nokia for $421 million.  If I am not mistaken, these are the 2 largest technology acquisitions of 2001 (where only a handful of acquisitions have been made in total all year).

Net gains to Enron on both of these investments (which were both made in 2000) will be small, but the acquisitions are a verification of EBS Ventures ability to pick the best telecom investments in the market (no other single investor is in both of these deals).  Steven Sheldon and Patrick Hickey deserve tremendous credit for originating and managing these investments.

Thanks,

Kevin Garland
Enron Principal Investments


you better not loose this file again!!!   don't forget to change the
information on it already to ours!


FYI
----- Forwarded by Pat Radford/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 08:37 AM -----

	Becky Tlucek
	09/13/2000 10:13 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Twanda
Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Legal Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Lexis Training

ENA Assistants:  Please let your assignments know that this training is
available if they are interested.  Thank you!-Becky

---------------------------------------------
On popular demand, Sylvia Hu has arranged to have Ed Chang, Lexis Corporate
Attorney back to Enron to do a presentation on "How to Search Public Records
on Lexis".  He'll also brief us on new features of Lexis.com.   Please see
the attached flyer for details.

Come see Certifinder & Company Dossier
LEXIS-NEXIS EASY SEARCH PAGES

Lexis Public Records Training
Date:   Wednesday, 9/27
Time:   11:30 Am - 1:00 PM
Place:   Conference Room EB47C2
Lunch will be provided by Lexis.
R.S.V.P. to Sylvia Hu x36775 by Noon, 9/26

 - enronpubrec.doc


_________________________________________________________________

                SPECIAL OFFER FROM THE MOTLEY FOOL
Roadmap to Retirement Online Seminar benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

Greetings:

Do you dream of a carefree retirement? Do you hope to retire
early? Well, set the date! Mark your calendar! And let the Fool
help you plot your course. In the Motley Fool's newest online
seminar, we help you figure out what to do now to retire when
and how you want.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=150019

During this 12-lesson, four-week interactive online course
you'll:

--Set a date - literally, and figure out when you want
  to retire

--Identify how much money you'll need and where it'll
  come from

--Develop an investment strategy to build long-term
  wealth

--Build a comprehensive plan for a successful retirement

No matter how young or old you are, now is the perfect time to
start planning, and it's easier than you think. We'll help you
create a solid plan that'll lead you toward the retirement you
deserve. If not, we gladly offer a 100% money-back guarantee.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=150020

Enroll now and save 15% off of the retail price, or take the
seminar for FREE by opening a no-minimum balance BUYandHOLD
discount brokerage account, and put the $46.75 you save toward
your future retirement.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=150021

Fool on,
The Motley Fool
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150022

P.S. Looking for biotech investment ideas? There are just a few
days left to enroll in our Biotechnology Investing Online
Seminar!
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=150023

_____________________________________________________

SPECIAL OFFERS FROM THE MOTLEY FOOL
To unsubscribe or change your preferences:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com

MsgId: msg-4284-B10102229Address.msg-14:34:42(10-10-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


LuckySurf.com, the FREE game that plays just like the Lottery,
has sent out Instant Winner Emails just like this one. And, this Email
could be a $1,000 Instant Cash Winner!
http://www.luckysurf.com/play?promo=iexentn111501us01

Just click below, pick 7 numbers, register, then click a banner. You'll
find out if you've won $1,000 Cash Instantly! All in about a minute.
Plus, you'll automatically be entered in the daily $1-Million Jackpot Drawing.
That's it. No Catch. No Clause.

http://www.luckysurf.com/play?promo=iexentn111501us01

Thanks and Good Luck !
The LuckySurf.com Team

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://i.pm0.net/remove?iexpect:10
* Enter your email address (pmims@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "iexpect:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address pmims@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: pmims@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:u9.xsl.2vvcl


no


PORTFOLIO REPORT - from Lycos Finance
Tuesday, Jan 15 2002 (generated at 03:00 PM PST)

Symbol      Close               Change     Today +/-             Total Return
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BEOS         0.12      +0.01  (+9.09%)       $+10.00       $120.00  (-99.31%)
EEX          2.14      +0.04  (+1.90%)       $+40.00      $2140.00  (-22.18%)
GW           2.85      +0.16  (+5.94%)     $+2400.00     $42750.00  (+34.12%)
KCS          2.62      +0.04  (+1.55%)      $+600.00     $39300.00 (+109.60%)
KEG          7.75      +0.10  (+1.30%)     $+1000.00     $77500.00  (+47.62%)
MHR          7.24      +0.15  (+2.11%)      $+750.00     $36200.00  (+81.00%)
TMR          3.60      +0.14  (+4.04%)     $+2100.00     $54000.00  (-20.00%)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals                                     $+6900.00    $252010.00  (+19.51%)

Index          Last              Change
---------------------------------------
DOW Jones   9924.15    +32.73  (+0.33%)
NASDAQ      2000.91    +10.17  (+0.51%)
SP500       1146.19     +7.78  (+0.68%)

=============================================================================
                       Need auto or term life insurance?
              Shop to save at Lycos Insurance Center.  We let you
          compare free insurance quotes to find the best rates around.
               http://finance.lycos.com/home/perfin/insurance.asp
=============================================================================

NEWS FOR THIS PORTFOLIO:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MHR:       MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES INC FILES FORM S-4 (*US:MHR)
           -Jan 15 2002 5:08PM (EDGAR Online)
           -http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=25932213

MHR:       Magnum Hunter Announces Closing of $11.2 Million Gulf of Mexico
           Lease Financing
           -Jan 15 2002 7:58AM (PR Newswire)
           -http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=25925139

=============================================================================
UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE PREFERENCES
---------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this and all Lycos Finance portfolio emails, send
email to unsubscribe@news.quote.com with REMOVE in the subject field.
Please be sure that you are emailing using the same account to which
this email was addressed.

Don't want this email?  Want it at a different time?  Or in summary form?
Click here to go to your Quote.com eMail Command Center.  All your options
can be changed here.

http://finance.lycos.com/home/portfolio/prefs.asp?FG=94C037AB-8875-438C-8C27-8F714F5D4461
=============================================================================


Attached is the ETS IT Statement of Work template.  It has not been changed
yet to reflect the GPG to ETS name change.


The room is 3AC5C1, according to this email.  I didn't check to see what it
was before.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 08/23/2000 01:29 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM
CDT)

I've changed it on your calendar.  I suppose it's in the same room.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	08/23/2000 01:26 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT)

This replaces the meeting scheduled for 400 tomorrow.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000 01:26
PM ---------------------------

John.Normand@enron.com@enron.com on 08/23/2000 11:47:29 AM
Sent by: Arlene.Chapman@enron.com
To: Mitch.Robinson@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com,
John.Schwartzenburg@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com, Bob.Greene@enron.com,
Dennis.Alexander@enron.com, Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, Gavin.Gaul@enron.com,
Mark.Dobler@enron.com, Ross.Newlin@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Invitation - Westinghouse/Gleason iss (08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT)

  (superscript: New meeting request from John Normand)

                08/24/2000 12:30 PM Local Time
                08/24/2000 02:00 PM Local Time

  Title:        Westinghouse/Gleason issues CR#5C1 - Lunch served
  (J.Normand, M.Robinson, K.Mann, J.Schwartzenburg, S.Dieball, B.Greene,
  D.Alexander, B.Barto, G.Gaul, M.Dobler, R.Newlin))
  Location:     -No room information available-

  Chair:        John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

  To (required):   Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron
  cc (optional):

     John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT wants you to attend a meeting.

On        08/24/2000 12:30:00 PM CDT
For       1 hour 30 minutes
With:          John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Chairperson)
          Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron (Invited)
          Kay Mann/Corp/Enron (Invited)
          John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Bob Greene/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Dennis Alexander/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Gavin Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)
          Mark Dobler/NA/Enron (Invited)
          Ross Newlin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Invited)

   Westinghouse/Gleason issues CR#5C1 - Lunch served (J.Normand,
M.Robinson, K.Mann, J.Schwartzenburg, S.Dieball, B.Greene, D.Alexander,
B.Barto, G.Gaul, M.Dobler, R.Newlin))


Ludmila,

#16 & 18.

Vince

Ludkam@aol.com on 01/11/2000 01:50:10 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, VKaminski@aol.com,
mshelunchik@worldnet.att.net
cc:
Subject: wyklady w Parents Weekend

http://www.stanford.edu/home/students/parents/weekend/wkdclasses.html

prosze wybrac 2 wyklady na piatek Feb. 25: 2:45-3:30 i 3:45-4:30, musze sie
zarejestrowac do Jan.13. Ludmila


Thanks Kate!  i just faxed that list of daily deals that need to be changed.
Please let me know if you don't receive it!
Kim

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/26/2001 10:04 AM

To: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: City of Riverside #552518

It's been changed. Thanks!

Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
03/26/2001 07:25 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: City of Riverside #552518

Hi Kate!
This deal needs to be changed to CAISO energy.  Also, I will be faxing the
list of West Daily Deals that need to be changed to "no confirm".
Thanks for your help!
Kim


With Rick, Mark, Lou, and possibly Hillings


Carin,

Please note some suggested changes in red.  Don't feel obligated to use them as is.
Let me know if you need additional infromation.

Scott


Martin Cuilla
2218 Bellefontaine #B
Houston, TX 77030

346-242  Table
346-244  Base
346-502  Air Chair (4)
346-501  Side Chair (2)

346-435  Sleigh Bed 5-0

346-527  Metal Canopy 5-0
346-457  Poster Bed 5-0

346-144  Armoire
346-237  Right Stone Top
346-236  Right Bachelor's Chest Base
346-235  Right Bachelor'e Chest
346-042  Dressing Chest
346-044  Dressing Chest Stone Top
346-043  Dressing Chest Base

346-709  Vanity
346-309  Vanity Mirror
346-509  Vanity Bench

Thanks,

Martin Cuilla

"madison" <pmadison@lexfurniture.com> on 10/25/2000 02:58:10 PM
Please respond to <pmadison@lexfurniture.com>
To: <mcuilla@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: furniture

Dear Martin Cuilla  ,

We have received your email request regarding Lexington Furniture Internet
sales.  In response to your inquiry, we do carry Bernhardt and the
collection Paris and we,ll be glad to quote prices for you.  Please include
your complete name and address in all future correspondence, along with the
style numbers you are interested in for pricing and in-home delivery
charges.

Please visit our web site at www.lexfurniture.com to see what else we have
to offer.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free
to call us at (859) 254-5362 or email again.

Thank you,
Madison
Lexington Furniture Company