Here's a copy of what we filed at FERC today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001 10:52 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
02/08/2001 09:58 AM

To: <nolan.steiner@avistacorp.com>, <dvermillion@avistaenergy.com>,
<rmcmanus@bakerbotts.com>, "J. Clifford Gunter" <cgunter@bracepatt.com>,
"Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>,
<gfergus@brobeck.com>, <JChen@brobeck.com>, <dmbutz@butzdunn.com>,
<andrzej_kabarowski@cargill.com>, <phillip_fantle@cargill.com>,
<psteele@coral-energy.com>, <rreilley@coral-energy.com>,
<kjohan@dwp.ci.la.ca.us>, <jmpa@dynegy.com>, <joel.newton@dynegy.com>,
<dfulton@enron.com>, <elizabeth.sager@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <mary.hain@enron.com>, <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>,
<rsanders@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>,
<sstack@enron.com>, <Fyanney@fulbright.com>, <jheath@fulbright.com>,
<jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com>, <sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com>,
<gkeltner@jsslaw.com>, <mghelms@jsslaw.com>, <dpickett@mdbe.com>,
<gerspamer@mofo.com>, <kirvin@mofo.com>, <rloeffler@mofo.com>,
<bcurrey@omm.com>, <jstamper@omm.com>, <john.fryer@pacificorp.com>,
<rbstrong@painehamblen.com>, <thord@perkinscoie.com>,
<jtiffany@pillsburywinthrop.com>, <nancy.loftin@pinnaclewest.com>,
<Timothy.Bolden@pinnaclewest.com>, <dmperlman@powersrc.com>,
<rosteen@powersrc.com>, <awu@qeuo.com>, <hao@quinnemanuel.com>,
<drusso@reliantenergy.com>, <mderstine@rhd-law.com>, <rheyman@rhd-law.com>,
<dgarber@sempra.com>, <wdsmith@sempra.com>, <rbeitler@sempratrading.com>,
<aorchar@smud.org>, <jdalfano@srpnet.com>, <paramfjord@stoel.com>,
<rcjosephson@stoel.com>, <mbrosterman@stroock.com>, <mgoldstein@stroock.com>,
<pjazayeri@stroock.com>, <theftler@stroock.com>, <ayudkowsky@strook.com>,
<katalin_kiss@transalta.com>, <sterling_koch@transalta.com>,
<antoine.cobb@troutmansanders.com>, <cfr@vnf.com>, <gdb@vnf.com>,
<hes@vnf.com>, <gackerman@wptf.org>
cc: "Andrea Settanni" <asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Tracey Bradley"
<tbradley@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Electronic Copy of Complaint Against PX

I've attached an electronic copy of the complaint, which has been filed
within the past hour.  Hard copies that also include the cover letter, Fed.
Reg. notice, and Appendix for service list are being mailed to all persons on
FERC's service list in EL00-95-000 (the San Diego complaint proceeding).

Thanks to all who contributed to this project; it was truly a group effort.
And special thanks to the nine companies that agree to join as signatories.

For those companies that did not join in, we encourage you to intervene ASAP
in support of the complaint, including the request for an immediate
suspension of the chargeback before the next round of chargeback invoices
come due (which we believe could be as early as Feb. 15).  Since we are
asking FERC to suspend the chargeback no later than Feb. 14, your immediate
intervention would be very helpful.

Thanks again.  Ron

 - CALPXCOM.DOC


Nora:

My first thoughts are to review the Solar Noncompetition Agreement (noncompete regarding the manufacture of photovoltaic cells in connection with the sale of Enron's 50% interest in the Amoco/Enron Solar Partnership to BP Amoco), the NewPower Noncompetition Agreement and the ServiceCo Noncompetition Agreement (EES new facility services venture).  My recollection is that the NewPower Noncompete and the ServiceCo Noncompete allow defeasance of the noncompetition provisions by permitting the investors to have put rights at fair market value (in other words, the noncompete provisions will bind a successor unless the investor honors the put rights).  It has been some time since I reviewed the Solar Noncompete, but I believe it could bind a successor if a third party merged or consolidated with Enron Corp., as opposed to a stock or asset purchase.  I also need to check the expiry date of this agreement, as it may be close to expiration.

Regards,
Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: Dobin, Nora
Sent: Fri 10/26/2001 10:29 PM
To: Rogers, Rex; Eickenroht, Robert; Armogida, Jim; Abrams, Clement; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Tweed, Sheila; George, Robert H.; Sager, Elizabeth; Gray, Barbara N.; Bushman, Teresa G.; Aronowitz, Alan; Keohane, Peter; Murray, Julia; Heinitz, Mary J.; Korkmas, Deb; Lyons, Dan; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Evans, Mark (London Legal)
Cc: Haedicke, Mark E.; Schuler, Lance (Legal); Mintz, Jordan
Subject: RE: Material Contract Review -- ASAP

To clarify, consider contracts to which Enron Corp., Enron North America Corp. or their subsidiaries are parties that contain provisions concerning a change of ownership/control of Enron Corp. or Enron North America Corp.  At this point, we are considering material contracts, or a group of similar or standard contracts that collectively are material, or contracts the breach of which could result in material liability.

Thanks, NJD

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Dobin, Nora
Sent:   Friday, October 26, 2001 6:05 PM
To:     Rogers, Rex; Eickenroht, Robert; Armogida, Jim; Abrams, Clement; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Tweed, Sheila; George, Robert H.; Sager, Elizabeth; Gray, Barbara N.; Bushman, Teresa G.; Aronowitz, Alan; Keohane, Peter; Murray, Julia; Heinitz, Mary J.; Korkmas, Deb; Lyons, Dan; Hodge, Jeffrey T.

Cc:     Haedicke, Mark E.; Schuler, Lance (Legal); Mintz, Jordan
Subject:        Material Contract Review -- ASAP

We just have been asked to review on an expedited basis all material contracts of ENE and ENA for change-of-control type provisions.  Please let us know what contracts or guidance you may have or know of; we need to begin reviewing/collecting information ASAP, i.e., this weekend.  If you know of someone who should receive this e-mail but who has not, please forward.  You may contact me at any of the below numbers.

Thanks for your help.

Regards, NJD

Nora J. Dobin
Senior Counsel
Enron Corp. - Global Finance
1400 Smith Street, Suite 2083
Houston, Texas 77002

Phone:  713/345-7723
Fax:      713/853-9252

Home:   713/864-1175


Part 2 of 3 Parts

Recruiting Enters New Phase Saturday

College coaches get to start calling recruits again Saturday after a layoff
of more than three months, and that usually means good things will start to
happen again  for the Longhorns.
Coach Mack Brown and his staff have revolutionized recruiting in Texas with
the their early commitment blitz, and it worked again this year with an even
dozen early pleges by August 2, including six who have been mentioned on one
or more national top 100 lists.
There haven't been any new ones since DT Tully Janszen of Keller picked Texas
over Oklahoma and Texas A&M back on August 2.
Under NCAA rules, college coaches get to call each recruit one time in May,
then they get to start calling them once a week on September 1, which is this
Saturday.
Those weekly calls probably will produce at least one or two more commitments
in September.
WR Marquis Johnson of Champaign, Ill., had planned to come to New Mexico
State season opener, and he had said there was a good chance he would commit
on his visit.
He still strongly favors the Longhorns, but wants to take his official visit
before committing.
One important thing to note here is that out-of-state kids can take official
visits during the football season. Texas kids cannot take official visits
because the University Interscholastic League, the governing body for high
school sports in Texas, has ruled that any player who takes an expense-paid
trip prior to the conclusion of football season loses his eligibility for
that season.
That means the only kids making official visits to Texas and other in-state
schools in September, October or early November will be from other states.
The Longhorns will have a lot of fine high school prospects as their guests
at the New Mexico State game, but they will be in Austin unofficially, which
means UT can give them a ticket and they have to pay for everything else,
including their transportation, food and lodging.
Here are the Longhorns' 12 early commitments:
Quarterbacks (1)
Billy Don Malone, 6-2 1/2, 185, 4.7, Paris North Lamar
Tight Ends (1)
David Thomas, 6-3, 210, 4.55, Wolfforth Frenship
Wide Receivers (1)
Dustin Miksch, 6-0, 167, 4.35, Round Rock Westwood
Offensive Linemen (2)
Brett Valdez, 6-4, 310, 5.2, Brownwood
Neale Tweedie, 6-5, 255, 4.9, Allen
Defensive Linemen (4)
Sonny Davis, 6-1, 320, 5.0, Austin Lanier  and Gulf Coast, Miss., JC
Earl Anderson, 6-3, 265, 4.8, San Marcos
Lyle Sendlein, 6-4, 260, 4.8, Scottsdale Chaparral
Tully Jantzen, 6-4, 255, 4.8, Keller
Linebackers (2)
Brian Robison, 6-3, 243, 4.6, Splendora
Marcus Myers, 6-3, 220, 4.5 Pflugerville Connally
Athletes (1)
Clint Haney, 5-11, 185, 4.27, Smithson Valley
* * * *
The Longhorns probably won't get another quarterback. Vincent Young, the
great prospect at  Houston Madison, says he is going to go out of state.
The only running back still on the UT radar screen is Albert Hardy of Galena
Park, the state's top back.
At tight end, Texas is still trying to get Eric Winston of Midland Lee, but
he comes from Aggie stock and is a long shot.
The Longhorns hope to get two more wide receivers, headed by Marquis Johnson
and then probably Biren Ealy of Cypress Falls.
Robert Timmons of Flower Mound Marcus is the state's most talented wideout,
but he is serving a three-week suspension to start the season and he played
only two games last year because of eligibility problems arising from
switching schools.
A wild card here is DaBryan Blanton, the small but lightning fast running
back from Forney.  He could be a wide receiver in college. Texas is
recruiting him.
Texas is still recruiting two offensive line prospects and probably will try
to sign both Justin Blalock of Plano East and Tony Ugoh of Spring Westfield.
The defensive line crop is loaded this year, and Texas is trying to sign DEs
Chase Pittman of Shreveport Evangel, Bryan Pickryl of Jenks, Okla., Travis
Leitko of The Woodlands, Larry Dibbles of Lancaster and Dontriel Coates of
Anahuac.
The Horns won't get all of them, of course, but they hope to get several of
them.
The North Carolina game on Sept. 8 has been dedicated to the memory of Cole
Pittman, Chase Pittman's brother who was killed in a tragic automobile
accident while returning to UT in February. He was a promising sophomore DT.
The situation at DT is much like the one at DE. Roderique Wright of Alief
Hastings, Marco Martin of Mesquite, Joseph Edwards of Dayton, Tuaren Brown of
Katy Cinco Ranch, Kasey Studdard of Highlands Ranch, Colo., and Loren Howard
of Scottsdale, Ariz., are all being recruited, and, hopefully, at least two
or three of them will sign with Texas.
At linebacker, outstanding middle backer Aaron Harris of Mesquite and speedy
outside backers Garnett Smith of Arlington Lamar and Glenn Jackson of
Carrollton Turner are the main hopes.
Texas probably will try to sign one or two defensive backs and the top one
who is considering the Horns is Ricky Wilson of Port Arthur Lincoln.
Speedy Edorian McCullough of North Garland would be a fine cornerback, but he
wants to be a running back. He likes Oklahoma and Texas.
RECRUITING NOTES: LeKeldrick Bridges of Dallas Hillcrest, one of the state's
top athletes, has given up football to concentrate on basketball, so he will
be disappearing from all the football prospect lists, including mine. . . The
strength of the this year's recruiting class statewide is in the defensive
line. There are more outstanding defensive linemen in the state than in any
other year since I've been doing this.

Injury Update

Senior starting LB Lee Jackson has a turf toe and probably will miss the
opener, with Tyrone Jones replacing him. Jackson is expected back for the
second game, but toe injuries sometimes are tough to shake off.
Junior DE O. J. McClintock is out indefinitely after suffering severe hand
and arm cuts in a household accident. The coaches hope he'll be back by
mid-season.
Junior WR Kyle Shanahan, a walk-on who is one of the Longhorns top four
receivers, is still recovering from a puncture wound in his leg. He tried to
jump a fence and didn't make it. He will miss the opener, but might be back
for the second game.

Subscribe To The E-Mail/Fax To Get Year-Round Football
& Recruiting Scoops !
Save Big As
An Internet Subscriber !
Whether you live close to Austin or far away, the True Orange E-Mail/Fax
Service is the way to keep up with Longhorn football and Longhorn recruiting -
 instantly. It has about 110 to 120 timely e-mail/faxes a year, primarily
about football and football recruiting.  To  subscribe, send your check to
True Orange, Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755, and copy or clip the coupon
below and fill in the blanks. If you want it mailed, or by E-Mail, just
include the right numbers.

o I'm enclosing $99 for the 99-fax package for the next year
o I'm enclosing $130 (an $11 saving) to renew my subscription to True Orange
and to subscribe to the 99 faxes.
o I'm enclosing $79 for the 99-fax package for the next year by E-Mail (a $20
saving)
o Here's  $110 to renew my subscription to True Orange and to subscribe to
the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $31 saving)
o Here's  $99 to subscribe to True Orange via the Internet  and to subscribe
to the 99 faxes by E-Mail (a $42 saving)

Name

Fax No.
(or E-Mail or mailing address)

Horns on Short List
Five Longhorn football players - senior OT Mike Williams, junior DE Cory
Redding, senior CB Quentin Jammer, senior MLB De'Andre Lewis and junior QB
Chris Simms - have been named to the watch lists for three of the nation's
most prestigious post-season awards.
Williams and Redding were named to the Rotary Lombardi Award Watch List,
Jammer was tabbed for the Jim Thorpe Award Watch List. Lewis was selected for
the Dick Butkus Award Watch List and Simms was chosen to the Davey O'Brien
National Quarterback Award Watch List.
Established in 1970, the Lombardi Award honors the nation's outstanding
linemanwho best exemplifies the character and discipline of  Vince Lombardi,
the legendary head coach of the Green Bay Packers.
Established in 1986, the Thorpe Award honors the nation's outstanding
defensive back. The award is named after the legendary Jim Thorpe, who was a
first-team Walter Camp Football Foundation All-American in 1911 and '12.
Thorpe also won gold medals in the pentathlon and decathlon at the 1912
Summer Olympics, played professional baseball and was elected the first
president of what would later become the National Football League in 1920.
The Butkus Award goes to the nation's top linebacker and is named for former
University of Illinois and NFL Hall of Famer Dick Butkus.
Simms was named as one of 30 candidates for the O'Brien award.
The O'Brien Award is named in honor of the late Davey O'Brien, the
All-American and Heisman Trophy-winning quarterback for TCU in the late 1930s.

Hayter Will Transfer

Junior RB Kenny Hayter plans to transfer to another school to try to get more
playing time. he has been granted a release.
With backup DE Adam McConathy transferring earlier and two freshmen, CB Adam
Ross of Tyler and LB Yamil LeBron of Killeen Ellison, failing to enroll for
academic reasons, the Longhorns are down to 79 scholarship players.
Ross was practicing with the team last week when it was determined that he
had problems with the NCAA Clearinghouse. He plans to return in January.
LeBron says he will attend junior college and then return to Texas.


The summary for the Las Vegas LM 6000 turbines is attached.  This reflects
GE's final comments on the numbers (both performance and dollars), and is
ready to deliver after attaching the following:

 (1)  I have overnighted to Ron's attention the 1" or so stack of exhibits
from the master contract.  Pricing and spares have been deleted.
 (2)  The payment schedule for the 4 machines.  Kent Shoemaker said that Ben
J. should have the payment schedule.

Bill:  The performance numbers have been changed from those in the master
agreement to adjust for altitude and the decrease in water injection.  Please
confirm that these are correct.

P.S.  Sheila is right--you just have to stay on these guys until you get what
you want out of them.  Kind of like bull riding, I guess . . . .


John,

My name is Adrian Clark, I am an executive recruiter in the energy industry.
One of my industry sources gave me your name but was not specific as to what
you do for Enron.  My firm, First Call Associates, is currently doing a
search for qualified front office personnel to present to our clients.  I
would like to know more about your background so I can discuss potential new
job opportunities if you are interested.  If the timing is not right for you
at this time, I've included my contact information for future reference.

You can find more information about my firm at www.firstcallassociates.com.
We are very familiar with the nuances of the energy trading business and
have built relationships with many energy companies in North America
enabling us to present qualified employees for their consideration.  Be
assured that any information we discuss will be completely confidential.  My
apologies for sending this to your email at work but I have not been able to
reach you by telephone during business hours.

Adrian Clark
Director
First Call Associates, Inc.
8 Andrew Dr.
Canton, CT  06019
860-693-4122
860-693-4118 (fax)
AClark@firstcallassociates.com

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Adrian Clark" <AClark@firstcallassociates.com>
To: <AClark@firstcallassociates.com>
Subject: Adrian Clark
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:15:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal

Executive recruiter in the energy and telecommunications industries.


13:39 20Aug2001 RSF-ANALYSIS-Brazil energy diet slims utilities' accounts

    By Andrei Khalip
    RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil, Aug 20 (Reuters) - The latest corporate results by Brazilian power utilities provided only a glimpse of the impact of energy rationing that started in June, but enough for analysts to say the sector is probably the most hard-hit by Brazil's economic woes.
    Coupled with a sharp depreciation of the real currency, which has lost about one-fourth of its dollar value so far this year, and an overall economic slowdown, power rationing should hammer energy companies further in coming months.
    "Although the currency's depreciation was the main culprit of poor results in the second quarter and first half, power rationing has already shown its face," said Oswaldo Telles, power sector analyst with BBV Securities.
    "And it will get worse for power utilities this quarter."
    The government was forced to resort to tough power rationing in June, ordering Brazilians to knock 20 percent off their usual power consumption, in order to avert crippling blackouts amid an acute power shortage.
    Brazil is dependent on hydroelectric plants for over 90 percent of its electricity. Two years of drought and full use of power stations' capacity to feed a growing economy dried up reservoir levels and triggered the worst energy crisis in at least 30 years in Latin America's largest country.
    Rationing, due to last at least until November, means lower sales and revenues for power firms, while their costs and dollar-denominated debt get inflated by the real's losses.
    "It's only the beginning of rationing, but it gives us an idea of how power utilities, distributors in particular, will be affected," said Eduardo de la Pena of Banco Santander. "I think we can say that they are suffering the most."
    Out of electricity sector stocks, most analysts only have a buy recommendation for Copel <CPLE3.SA> of southern Parana state, where there is no energy shortage and no rationing.
    GOVERNMENT HELP SOUGHT
    Among the big losers in the past six months were Sao Paulo's Cesp <CESP4.SA> utility whose losses rose sharply and   Eletropaulo <ELPL4.SA>, controlled by US-based AES Corp. <AES.N>, which posted a net loss after a year-ago profit.
    Rio de Janeiro's power distributor Light <LIGH3.SA> last week posted its biggest half-year loss ever of 431 million reais ($172 million) and Light officials said the company should suffer big losses this year with revenues falling at least 10 percent due to the rationing program.
    The main problem for companies is that the government fixes electricity prices in Brazil -- even though most distributors had long been privatized -- and allows the adjustments to compensate for higher costs only once a year.
    "This year, their costs grew so violently that when the adjustments came it was about time to adjust tariffs again," said Telles. "But they just have to wait till next year.
    Analysts said the only bright spot may be that the government will allow companies to start adjusting tariffs twice in one year. There are rumors of such a change although analysts recognize such an unpopular measure would be difficult in the run-up to presidential elections next year.
   In an ironic twist, power distributors are now spending money on lawyers to defend in court the government's order for power switchoffs for quota-busters -- the measure that effectively slashes their revenues.
    In the meantime, the companies are banking on an obscure contractual clause, known as Annex V, that should compensate them for lost revenue due to rationing. Some have even booked that gain in the latest results, although the government has so far not confirmed that it will pay.
    "Annex V is the biggest question for power firms. If there is no compensation, they are screwed," said another analyst.
    ($1=2.5 reais)
 ((Rio de Janeiro Newsroom, 5521 223 7144))

For Related News, Double Click on one of these codes:
[nN20239370] [LIGH3.SA] [ELPL4.SA] [CPLE3.SA] [AES.N] [O] [OIL] [ELN] [E] [U] [T] [M] [D] [CRD] [BR] [LATAM] [EMRG] [ELG] [ENR] [RES] [US] [RESF] [LEN] [RTRS] [LIGH3] [ELPL4] [CPLE3] [AES]
 Monday, 20 August 2001 13:39:51
RSF [Historical News] {C}
ENDS


Let's conference call at 6; I will meet Mike afterwards and update him on
the
discussion.
My work number is 510.649.6476.
Talk to you in a little while.
Jonathan

On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 Martin.Esarte@clorox.com wrote:

>
>
> I could also do a six o'clock conference call.  My number at work is (510)
> 271-2143.
>
> Marty
>
>
>
>
> "Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com> on 09/20/99 12:09:23 PM
>
>
>
>  To:      Jonathan Hudacko <hudacko@haas.Berkeley.EDU>
>
>  cc:      Jeffrey Dasovich <dasovich@haas.Berkeley.EDU>,
>           Michael Kang <mkang@haas.Berkeley.EDU>, Martin
>           Esarte <esarte@haas.Berkeley.EDU>(bcc: Martin
>           Esarte/US-Corporate/Clorox)
>
>
>
>  Subject: Re: survey technology
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 6 o'clock conference call works for me.  i could conference using my phone.
> would need to get folks phone numbers to make the call. let me know.  best,
jeff
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan Hudacko <hudacko@Haas.Berkeley.EDU> on 09/20/99 08:40:02 AM
>
>
>
>  To:      Jeffrey Dasovich <dasovich@haas.Berkeley.EDU>,
>           Michael Kang <mkang@haas.Berkeley.EDU>, Martin
>           Esarte <esarte@haas.Berkeley.EDU>
>
>  cc:      (bcc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES)
>
>
>
>  Subject: survey technology
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks to the brilliance of our colleagues, we don't need my feeble cgi
> programming skills after all; we can use the www.inetsurvey.com site to
> host the survey and gather feedback. Now we just need to crystallize our
> survey questions; I will take care of getting the survey set up on this
> site.
> Since 3 of us don't have class tonight, I am available to phone conference
> between 6-8; alternatively I can meet anyone at school (same timeframe).
>
> Jonathan
>
> *********************
> * Jonathan Hudacko  *
> * 510.649.6476 (WK) *
> * 415.305.4293 (HM) *
> *********************
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

*********************
* Jonathan Hudacko  *
* 510.649.6476 (WK) *
* 415.305.4293 (HM) *
*********************


pmorrison@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

Dear Market Participants,

Please note an upgrade to the NYISO internet connection is
scheduled for Wednesday 12/13/2000 at 7PM to 8PM (1900 - 2000).

This upgrade is not likely to cause any interruption to your
access to OASIS/MIS/CSS systems.  However, we want you to be
aware of this event in case you want to avoid exposure to any
possible interruption of service.

Regards,
Customer Relations
518-356-6060


Harry:

Let me know what you think.  Thanks.  SR:-)


I will send her a note right now.

Steve Pearlman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
04/30/2001 04:58 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Need another reference

Scott,

Thanks for the help with Dave Duran.  He wants to offer me a job, and he sent
me to talk to Louise Kitchen today, which I did.  She told me that she wanted
to check my references.  I was wondering if you would be willing to drop her
a note on me.  She would probably put a lot more stock in your view than in
most of the other guys I have worked with in EI and EBS.  Thanks, I
appreciate it.

Steve


PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERS FOR AIRPORT  SECURITY
There is overwhelming evidence that highly  professional public-
private partnerships work in high-threat European  countries, says
Kenneth P. Quinn, former chief counsel to the Federal  Aviation
Administration.
The European system compares favorably to the  unfunded mandate to
provide security at airports that is put on American  airlines,
says Quinn:
o There, the screening workforce is about 15 percent  public
and 85 percent private, and wages are often 60  percent
higher -- here, wages are too low.
o There, turnover is around 15 percent; here, it  often
exceeds 100 percent.
o There, national governments impose strict training,  with
36 hours' classroom time and up to 200 hours' airport
training -- here, we require 12 hours' classroom and  only
40 hours' on-the-job training.
There, proof of European Union member-state  citizenship is often
required of workers. Here, resident-alien status  suffices.
There, federal governments license the companies and  their
workers. Here, all security responsibilities fall on  carriers,
with no federal certification.
Disparaging and certainly nationalizing the private  workforce at
U.S. airports -- which by all accounts performed  properly on
Sept. 11 -- will cause the current system of contract  workers to
break down, as workers look for new jobs or transfer  to more
secure ones.
President Bush has asked Congress not to tie his  hands by
preventing him from turning to the private sector,  saying:
"Giving the government flexibility to use private  contractors
will facilitate transition to the new system, promote  better
screening services through competition, and ensure  that security
managers can move swiftly to discipline or remove  employees who
fail to live up to the rigorous new  standards."
Source: Kenneth P. Quinn, "Nationalization won't  work," USA
Today, October 26, 2001.

Gary T. Schoen,  CFA
Frontier Investment Management Co.
(TEL) 972.934.2590
(FAX)  972.934.0002www.frontierinvest.com

***************************
The opinions expressed in this message and/or any  attachments are those of the author and not necessarily those of Frontier  Investment Management Co. ("Frontier"), its subsidiaries and affiliates. There  is no guarantee that this message is either private or confidential, and it may  have been altered by unauthorized sources without your or our knowledge. Nothing  in the message is capable or intended to create any legally binding obligations  on either party and it is not intended to provide investment advice. Frontier  accepts no responsibility for loss or damage from misuse of the information,  including damage from virus. The material is based upon information we consider  reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete and should not  be relied upon as such.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Chen, Hai
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 8:55 AM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Subject:	Options Market Update
Importance:	High

T.J.,

Please forward the attached Option Market Update to traders and mid-marketers.  Thanks!

Hai


do we have a date for interviewing Tim Mccarty yet?  Did I send him a
letter?  df


David,

During today's VaR coordination meeting  we had a discussion of issues
related to mapping of the forward price curves into core locations.

Mapping is a  necessity dictated by the limitations of the computer system:
we have to reduce the dimensionality of the problem to stay within the bounds
of available CPU memory. Also, in some cases the quality of price discovery is poor
and it's difficult to model the price curves independently: we solve the problem by mapping
them into more liquid and better behaved core  locations curves.

We have agreed on the following:

1. Winston will investigate the IT side and determine to what extent we can increase the number
of forward price curves that are simulated as basic (core) curves. He will investigate the impact of a larger
number of the core curves on the time required to complete the VaR run.

2. The curves associated with the biggest 10-20 positions in each commodity should be
modeled as core curves (i.e. no mapping into other locations). It makes sense to monitor
the biggest risks separately and avoid aggregating them into  less transparent aggregates.

3. The results of an automated clustering (mapping) procedures should be systematically
monitored by a human and corrected if they misrepresent the risks of the trading positions.
This responsibility should be vested with one person (right now the responsibility is
dispersed through the organization and this means in practice that nobody
is responsible). Research can allocate one person to this task;
cooperation of trading and RAC will be critical.

Vince


2nd memo to Rick last night.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jean Ryall/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001 10:02
AM ---------------------------

Jean Ryall
04/26/2001 12:49 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: HB 2107 update and PUCT ruling

The PUCT ruled today that the utilities' excess earnings balance will be
credited to the wires...amortized over 7 years with 7.5% interest beginning
Jan 1, 2002.  (Trueup was not until 2004).  Utilities are unhappy however,
this is the direction the commission had indicated they were heading a few
weeks ago.  The excess earnings total over $6 billion dollars (new numbers
came out today).

I visited with Rep. Turner today after the commission's ruling, AECT set up a
meeting with him to cut a deal.  Our commitment with Turner is that he will
not harm the headroom created in SB 7 and subsequent PUCT decisions.  Turner
was not completely happy with the commission's order because he was hoping
for a larger refund check to rate payers.  Our amendment to HB 2107 (which
refunds the excess earnings to the wires) is in line with the commission's
decision.  When we signed on board with Turner, he said that if we stood with
him, he would protect our interest.  Thank you for letting us get on board
with him.  The IOUs are trying to cut a deal with him and because we stood
with him...our interest should come first (as he has stated).

During the HB 2107 committee hearing in March, Baker (TXU)  indicated that
excess earnings should be returned to the wires (in 2004 trueup).  (I am
getting the transcript of that hearing in the morning to confirm my memory).

In a hearing on Nov 8, 2000 at the PUCT, Shaeffer ( Reliant) testified "We
believe that if we overrecover stranded investment, that we're going to
refund the dollars down to the book value".  Of course he meant during the
2004 trueup, however, with the overcollection reaching $6 billion - and with
today's commission ruling - a refund of the overcollection before 2004 is
inevitable.

Chairman Wolens (off the record) indicated today that HB 2107 would go to
conference.  I think it is safe to infer he thinks the bill will pass the
House and move to the Senate.  Turner has worked the Black Caucus, Hispanic
Caucus and the Democratic Caucus.

Rep. Counts (West Texas Conservative D) stood with Turner at the press
conference along with Rep. Bailey and Rep. Hodge...each of them advocated for
a refund of the overcollection.  (At the press conference Turner stated that
he would drop his bill and wait until the 2004 trueup if the utilities would
agree to keep everyone's lights on until the 2004 trueup.) The bill is likely
to be heard on the House floor next Tuesday.

I did not provide comments/quotes to Fort Worth Star Telegram...they were
told I was at the Capitol at a hearing.  I am working on a formal statement
and gathering the support of other market participants with our interest to
sign on.  I will run that by you before anything goes out.

Thus far, Enron, Calpine, New Energy, Strategic,  and Excelon are willing to
publically support our amendment to HB 2107.  (Others are supporting it but
won't come out of the closet because they fear the utilities.) We are talking
to Shell on Friday.  (They got confused and are supporting the bill as
filed...which hurts headroom...they like our amendment but want to talk
Friday before supporting it.)

Thanks for your help with this, Jean


Jeff,
 Don't you think this is a good thing? It sounds like the generators will not
be singled out and that all market players: load, gen, rate payers etc., will
need to take a little pain. This is the first time I've heard anyone say that
rate payers will take some pain. Keep sending this stuff.

Bob


no.


Charles:

Just a couple of more comments:

Page one, second bullet, needs a comma at the end of the statement

Page two "Authority of the Standards Setting Organization," I highlighted the middle sentence and asked you to clarify -- that was not changed and the highlights and my question are still in the draft.

Page three -- second to last sentence has two periods.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Sarah

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yeung, Charles
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 5:41 PM
To:	Novosel, Sarah; Shelk, John
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Bestard, Jose; Rodriquez, Andy
Subject:	RE: Enron Support of a Standards Setting Organization

Change in strategy.

We need to include the arguments for FERC rulemaking.  I have accepted the changes re: "FERC created".

The answer to your question about financial bilaterals is that they are NOT a part of the SSO standards.  I added the word "physical" to the transactions and if you look at the ensuing paragraph, I explain that purely financial arrangements are exlcuded.

I hope this works.  Let me know and I will get this to EPSA ASAP.  BFN (bye for now)
 << File: Enron Principles on Electric SSO2.doc >>
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Novosel, Sarah
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 1:54 PM
To:	Shelk, John; Yeung, Charles
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Bestard, Jose; Rodriquez, Andy
Subject:	RE: Enron Support of a Standards Setting Organization

I have some comments, which are attached.  I redlined my changes, and they appear in light blue (there are several red-lined colors in the document).  Many of the changes are editorial, but some are also substantive and are based on our prior position, developed when we were working on legislation, that FERC has to create the SSO.  If we are taking the position in this document that an SSO can be created without FERC, then you may want to delete the references to FERC creating the SSO.  I also included a couple of questions where I thought a statement was unclear.  You may just want to reword the sentence to make it a little clearer.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Sarah

 << File: Enron Principles on Electric SSO.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shelk, John
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 12:25 PM
To:	Yeung, Charles; Novosel, Sarah
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Bestard, Jose; Rodriquez, Andy
Subject:	RE: Enron Support of a Standards Setting Organization

	I have reviewed the SSO principles -- look good to me.  Thanks for sending them to look at.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yeung, Charles
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 11:41 AM
To:	Shelk, John; Novosel, Sarah
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Bestard, Jose; Rodriquez, Andy
Subject:	Enron Support of a Standards Setting Organization

John and Sarah

In the aftermath of the NERC BOT resolutions last week that wraps in business practices under the NERC purview, we are being asked by Nevius and Gent if we are in support of NERC becoming the SSO.

I have drafted a response that outlines what we need from an SSO.  We are not indicating if we support NERC or GISB/EISB - but are seeking the resolution of key fundamentals of an SSO before we sign on.

Per Jim's request, please take a look at the words and let me know if you have any concerns.  I plan to send this to EPSA so they can borrow some of the language for a letter that the EPSA-NAERO working group agreed to send to NERC.  I also will send it to Dave Nevius under Jose and my signature.

 << File: Enron Principles on Electric SSO.doc >>


With Ken Lay's resignation, you undoubtedly have questions about Enron's management structure and what lies ahead for the company.  The purpose of this communication is to begin to answer those questions and lay out the direction we plan to follow as we regroup and rebuild.

First, the Creditors Committee has proposed that the Board of Directors retain an interim CEO to focus on the restructuring process.  This is a positive sign that the Committee believes Enron will provide greater value as a viable ongoing business.

The Enron Board of Directors has approved Stephen Cooper as interim CEO and chief restructuring officer.  Steve is the managing partner of Zolfo Cooper, a corporate recovery and crisis management firm with more than 30 years experience leading companies through operational and financial reorganizations.

Steve and his firm will work with members of Enron's current management to develop and implement a comprehensive plan to restructure the company and emerge from bankruptcy.

As you know, Enron has entered into an agreement with UBS Warburg for the sale of NetCo, Enron's wholesale gas and power trading organization.  In preparation for the transition of NetCo to UBS, Greg Whalley has resigned as president and COO of Enron to assume a position with UBS Warburg.  We want to thank Greg and the NetCo employees joining UBS for their contributions to Enron and wish them great success going forward.

In addition to engaging Steve, Enron has formed an Office of the Chief Executive.  I will join Steve in that office as president and chief operating officer, and Ray Bowen will join us as executive vice president and chief financial officer.

We will provide additional information regarding the roles and responsibilities of Enron's entire management team once those become more fully defined.

Thank you for continuing to support Enron by performing your job everyday.  The ongoing uncertainty about our future, coupled with the constant media scrutiny, makes this situation difficult for all of us. While no one can control the media, we can and will define our leadership and devise our strategy for moving ahead.  And in doing so, we will build a more certain future for our company and our employees.

Link to the press release: http://www.enron.com/corp/pressroom/releases/2002/ene/012902Release.html


The attached schedule is for Thursday, March 28.  Associated text files have been posted to Sparky.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager, Load Forecasting
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


eSource presents free Dow Jones Interactive training
Attend one of our Dow Jones Interactive Personalizing/Customizing DJI and
Custom Clips Clinics:

Mar. 9 9:00 - 9:45 PM  EB572
   10:00 - 10:45 PM  EB572
   11:00 - 11:45 PM EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
* Please bring your Dow Jones Interactive login ID and password. If you don't
have one, a guest ID will be provided.

Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


Per your request . . .

 - #1127382 v10 - NEW AGENCY AGREEMENT.doc


Thanks - I'm sure glad one of us is thinking!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Stewart Rosman
	02/09/2001 12:36 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ISDA/Financial Trades for Washington State PUD's and Muni's

The four counterparties are munis.

I believe you are referring to the City of Oakland not Portland with respect
to the ISDA.

Stewart

From: Sara Shackleton on 02/09/2001 12:28 PM CST
To: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: ISDA/Financial Trades for Washington State PUD's and Muni's

Stewart:

I'd be glad to draft a "sample ISDA" for you and Jeff to use.  Please verify
that the type of counterparty you are looking at will be a
municipal/governmental.

On a related matter, we are still waiting to speak with Ed Sachs about the
credit rating for the City of Portland and should have the agreement to you
afterwards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Stewart Rosman
	02/09/2001 12:02 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA/Financial Trades for Washington State PUD's and Muni's

Sara -

Jeff Fuller is interested in pursuing ISDA's with a number of his other
customers after a successful experience with Merced Irrigation District.  He
would like a generic ISDA to start with and hopes to negotiate four ISDA's in
the near future.  The purpose of the ISDA will be to hedge their price risk
once they get a piece of slice (this is a BPA plan to allocate slices of
their system to customers).  Feel free to call me if you have any questions
at 503-464-3810.

Stewart
---------------------- Forwarded by Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
10:45 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jeff Fuller <JFuller@prmllp.com>                           02/09/2001
08:06 AM

To: "'Stewart Rosman'" <Stewart.Rosman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: ISDA/Financial Trades for Washington State PUD's and Muni's

Stewart,

PRM has 4 utility clients (Benton PUD, Franklin PUD, Grays Harbor PUD and
City of Richland) that will be purchasing BPA's Slice product beginning
October 1, 2001.  I want to get the process started to get ISDA's in place
between Enron and these utilities.  We are currently in the beginning stages
of discussing financial trades with their legal counsel.  Fortunately for
Enron, I think we can have one attorney represent all 4 of PRM's clients.
(FYI, that attorney will be Doug Rosenberg at Preston Gates & Ellis in
Seattle.)

To get started, I'd like Enron to forward to me copies of the ISDA agreement
that you would propose as the starting point for discussions.  I also ask
that you send me a list/examples of any other documentation Enron will
require (e.g., legal opinion, board resolution, etc.).  Please send just one
set of documentation at this point.  I want to get the basic legal review
process underway before you prepare four different sets of documents.  I'd
also like to request that when we get to the point of having Enron's
attorney walk through the ISDA with our attorney, that Enron use Sara
Shackleton.  Sara was great to work with when we went through this for
Merced, and I think she'd be extremely helpful once again as we venture into
new territory with these 4 utilities.

Thanks for your help.

Jeff


PHILLIP, Free Software now available to you from Sega, IBM, Disney,
Simon & Schuster and many others!

You have been selected to receive unlimited free software programs from the biggest
publishers in the world. Click below to receive your free software programs today!

Click here: http://www.freesoftwarepromotions.com/100012
AOL Members Click Here

All titles are full-version, CD-ROMs (not shareware or demos) that are currently
sold in retail outlets for as much as $50 each.

Act today while supplies last!
So hurry up and take advantage of this (almost) too-good-to-be-true offer
by clicking on the link below!

Yes, I want free software!
Click here: http://www.freesoftwarepromotions.com/100012
AOL Members Click Here

Brought to you by FreeSoftwarePromotions in conjunction with Sega TM,
IBM TM, Simon & Schuster TM and Crayola TM.

______________________________________________________________________
Below are just a few of the 100's of titles that are ALL FREE!
Visit our website to see more.

American Heritage -History of the US
Bodyworks 6.0
Chessmaster 5500
Compton's Complete - Interactive Cookbook
Crayola Magic 3D Coloring
Deer Avenger!
Environmentally Safe Home
Food Lover's Encyclopedia
Future Cop - LAPD
House Beautiful 3D -
Interior Designer
Inside the SAT & ACT
Logic Quest
Math Invaders
Money Town
Nuclear Strike
Pink Panther
Pizza Pilots
Planetary Taxi
Reader Rabbit
Resumes That Work
Road Rash
Spellbound
SEGA Rally Championship
Simon & Schuster's New Millennium Encyclopedia
Smithsonian: Total Amazon
Think & Talk French
Tom Clancy's SSN -
Virtua Fighter
Virtua Squad
Virtual On Cybertrooper
Webster's New World Dictionary & Thesaurus
Weight Watcher's Light & Tasty Deluxe
World Book
Worldwide Soccer

Click here: http://www.freesoftwarepromotions.com/100012
AOL Members Click Here

_________________________________________________________________________
PHILLIP, This email message may be a recurring mailing.
If you would like to be removed from the United Marketing Strategies
email announcement list, click on the link below (You may need to
copy and paste the link into your browser)click below:
http://mail01.unitedmarketingstrategies.com/remove/unsubscribe.html
Remove
__________________________________________________________________________


FYI.  I'll bring you the ONSI confidentiality agreement.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/26/2000 05:51
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           09/26/2000 08:35 AM

To: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FCE/Confidential

Hi Dan,

One more thing I want to mention.  As you know, Enron has a confidentiality
agreement with a competitor of Fuel Cell (I believe it is ONSI).  The
agreement has an exclusivity arrangement, which prevents the other company
from chasing certain transactions without Enron.  Once we really know what we
are going to do with FCE, will it be necessary/advisable to waive the
exclusivity provision to avoid any restraint of trade arguments?

FYI, When I last discussed the other company with Ozzie and Heather on
Friday, they were planning on calling the other company to tell them the
general status without violating confidentiality obligations to FCE or CRRA.
I will follow up to get the details of the discussion.

Kay


We will be running a December MTD DPR tomorrow.  Before we start this process please recalc the East, West, Eastbank, & Westbank portfolios to AdHoc.  Check one more time that only terminated counterparties are in the Bank portfolios and all terminated counterparties are out of the East and West portfolios.

Before kicking off the calcs, double check the specific deals that are listed on the Physical Power Terminated spreadsheet.  I believe there were whole deals moved to the Bank portfolios by Will that should never have been moved, because they were already liquidated in November.  Also, I have attached a new copy of the physical terminations.  There is one counterparty (TXU) added to the list that we need to take care of before kicking off the calcs.  In addition to adjusting deal entry for TXU we also need to adjust scheduling.

Before recalcing the Bank portfolios, please contact Debbie Brackett or Stephanie McGinnis (4-2022) to make sure that they have extracted the data they need from the portfolios.

We should still be calcing on 'No True-up'.  Casey, I know you said this probably will still cause us trouble.  At this point, we are going for reasonableness with numbers.  All the previous top-levels in our rolls (as of the 3rd or 4th) will stay as top-levels until we know the exact amount of cash that is being attributed to power.  The remaining prior day values will be held in Schedule E for Georgeanne to move to a balance sheet account.  These top levels should match the total value of your Bankruptcy portfolios.  Where I think it will get tricky is that we are calculating as of the 18th and have transactions in the Bankruptcy portfolio that are before the 18th and therefore will fall into your liquidations.  These numbers will also have to moved to Schedule E.

When running through liquidations in the East and West portfolios, we will not be flat.  Currently, we are liquidating all non-terminated counterparties other than those specifically negotiated out of by scheduling.  (Thresa and I are working on this with Corry and Cara).  The settlements group will figure out what the counterparty agrees with through the check-out and ultimately the clean-up process.

Tomorrow should be a blast - I can't wait!!!

Stacey


---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 08:45
AM ---------------------------

knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/06/2000 07:59:13 AM
To: " - *Kinney, Doug" <dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
*jcasas2@enron.com." <jcasas2@enron.com>
cc: " - *Stiles, Marianne" <mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Porter,
Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Perrone, Brian"
<bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Herzog, Hans"
<hherzog@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Flewellyn, Melissa"
<mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Dalphon, Charles"
<cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: DPL REVISED OFO

DPL has just revised its OFO for the following days:

Tuesday March 7th - previous OFO volume was 943 dth, please deliver 763 dth
instead.

Wednesday March 8th - previous OFO volume was 863 dth, please deliver 743 dth
instead.

Chris Germany will be advised of this change via a spreadsheet sent by Herndon
at 9 am est.


Geez.

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 12/22/2000 10:26 AM
To: Lisa Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: John Novak/SA/Enron@enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@enron

Subject: RE: Enron South America FacilityAgreement and Exhibits

The original contract covered 24 LM6000 turbines.  The "break-out contracts"
cover the turbines going to specific projects.  There is a provision in the
original LM6000 contract which contemplates "facility agreements" covering
one or more of the LM6000 turbines.  We call them "break out contracts" as a
short-hand reference.

	Lisa Alfaro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	12/21/2000 05:29 PM

		 To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: RE: Enron South America FacilityAgreement and Exhibits

Thanks for the documents.   I understand that these are final.  Why is there
a South America Facility and a ESAT Break out Contract?  Aren't they the same?


FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001 08:48 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	04/10/2001 08:47 PM

		 To: Diane Dimeff <dimeff@Haas.Berkeley.EDU> @ ENRON,
tambornino@haas.berkeley.edu
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wrong Number

Greetings Diane:

Could you check the work phone for Joseph Brophy.  I've got 408.390.5291 on
my list of admitees to call and I'm getting the "not a valid number"
recording.  Thanks a bunch.

Best,
Jeff


Kathy/Brian,

As I'm sure you know we are trying to determine what is causing the Canadian
VAR to be so high.  One possible cause that we would like your help
investigating is the Curve Codes that are being loaded in the position files
that are manually loaded into the system each night.  It is my understanding
that positions will be correct even if the curves loaded are spelled
incorrectly. However, incorrect curve names will result in the positions not
being captured in the VAR calculation.  Please verify that all the curves are
spelled correctly in all position files.

Please give me a call if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Robin


Mark
This is Planning's response to your request of 10/10/2001 regarding two new gas wells hook up into TW's system.
The two wells were as follows:

SE/4 of Section 20- 23S-27E Eddy County, NM

This well is located near Sid Richardson gathering system and approximately 4.4 miles to the suction side of the TW- Keystone Compressor Station.
The suction pressure at Keystone is 525-575 psig.
Are they interested to build up to 4.5 miles of pipe to TW? If they are what is pressure/maximum volume that this well can produce?

Center of Section 22-Block B-3 PSL Winkler County Texas

This well is located approximately .3-.5 mile to TW-Crawford 16" lateral. The Crawford lateral line pressure is 680-720 psig.
Can this well meet TW's line pressure ? what is the maximum flow rate on this well?

Please share this information with your customer and let me know about your response on this project?

Mansoor

-----Original Message-----
From: 	Alters, Dennis
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:08 AM
To:	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor
Cc:	McConnell, Mark
Subject:	FW: New hook up request

Mansoor, Please proceed with Mark's request. Thanks Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From:	McConnell, Mark
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Alters, Dennis
Subject:	New hook up request

Dennis,  Attached is what I've got.
Please assign and have them contact the rep below to get the information you need.
I'll also pass on anything else I get.
Let me know who gets this project.
Thanks,
Mark
x57896

-----Original Message-----
From:	Cathy Pittman [mailto:cathy@beacon-gas.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 11:49 AM
To:	therese.lohman@enron.com
Subject:	Pipeline Information

I am looking to see if TWPL is close to the two wells that are about to drilled. I work with Lori Vining at Beacon Petroleum and I am trying to find Pipelines in the area.
The areas are:
Eddy County, New Mexico - SE/4 of SECT 20  23S-27E.
Winkler County, Texas - Center of SECT 22 - B3 Public School Land
I went out to the Point catalog and looked up the counties to see what was in the area and found some information, but I was just wanting to make sure I get it right.
I would appreciate any help.
Thank you for time,
Cathy Pittman
VP Gas Control
Beacon Petroleum Management, Inc.
Cathy@beacon-gas.com
P 972-758-9393
F 972-758-9396


Please join me on Thursday, January 11 from 1:00 to 4:00 pm for a special
information session for the Operations Management teams supporting Enron
Americas, Enron Global Markets and Enron Industrial Markets.   We will focus
on assessing, managing and mitigating operational risk.  Details on the
location for the meeting will be sent to you early this week.

I look forward to seeing everyone at this meeting on the 11th.  The things
that we will discuss will be important for each and every one of you as you
carry out your roles in 2001.  I hope that you will make every effort to
attend.  Please let me know as soon as possible if you have a conflict that
will keep you from attending the meeting.


Attached are the worksheets for August 2000 activity. There are three
different worksheets {2-supply & 1-market}.

 The market worksheet is preliminary and will continuously be updated
throughout the month.
 The supply worksheets capture all "buybacks and the relevant  pricing data.
 These three worksheets can be found in two separate files. O:
logistics/Robert Lloyd/buydeaug2000.xls.............supply
                                                      O: logistics/Ken
Seaman/industrialsmonthly/industrials0800.xls.....marketing

 Sorry for the delay in providing you'll this data.


<title>Untitled Document</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

If
 you do not wish to receive email from Bargain Bazaar, please Click Here:

 UNSUBSCRIBE

PATRICE,

In the last few weeks alone, over
 1,000 people have taken advantage of an unprecedented
 opportunity exclusive to our Elite members.
 We wanted to give our Elite members one more chance
 to get involved before Mr. Hansson went public and
 made this offer available to anyone.  It took
 some begging, but thankfully he agreed to put off
 the public release for one more week.

If you're unfamiliar with what
 this is about, read on, it's incredible.

A very prominent and successful
 businessman out of Seattle, Washington by the name
 of Theodore Hansson has decided to split the profits
 with you 50-50 on very lucrative deals using a very
 simple technique that big business is trying to keep
 secret.  Not only is it realistic to make up
 to $5,000 per deal, Mr. Hansson takes ALL the risk
 away from you by providing ALL the money needed for
 YOU to complete highly profitable deals.

Find
 out how you can get involved with Mr. Hansson by

  <Clicking Here>

 The previous was an advertisement.
 The views expressed in it are those of the advertiser
 only. As with any business you could make more or
 less money than the results described. Your results
 will be based on your individual monetary investments,
 business experience, expertise, and your level of
 desire. There are no guarantees concerning the level
 of success you may experience, other than the advertisers
 product performance & return policy, if applicable.


when do I get my drink


Thanks, Dan.  I've scanned and they look good to me, but I'll pass on to my
client for the final say-so.  I believe we can get this done fairly soon.
Grant.

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
  Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 2:36 PM
  To: grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
  Cc: Kim.Ward@enron.com
  Subject: RE: Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale
Agreement

  Grant,
       Sorry for the delay in responding to your additional
inquiries.
       7.   Re 4.2(iv)(b) - I would propose the clause to
read:  "(b) file a
  petition or otherwise commence, authorize or acquiesce in
the commencement
  of a proceeding or cause under any bankruptcy or similar law
of the
  protection of creditors, or have such petition filed against
it and such
  proceeding remains undismissed for 30 Days, provided if a
petition is filed
  against the Affected Party and the  Affected Party is
actively pursuing all
  steps to have such proceeding dismissed and provides the
other party with
  reasonable documentation supporting its actions to cause
such proceeding to
  be dismissed, then such Affected Party shall have an
additional 30 Days to
  effectuate such dismissal,"
       8.   Re 4.2 (v) and 4.2 (vi) -  "20 or more Gas Days"
is acceptable.
       13.  I will change the definition of "Act" as you
suggest.
       21.  I propose that language be added whereby the
parties shall first
  attempt to settle the matters to be resolved by the use of
binding
  Arbitration by mon-binding mediation and if that does not
resolve the issue
  to the satisfaction of the parties, such matter shall
thereafter be
  resolved by the use of binding Arbitration.  Is this an
acceptable
  resolution?
       22.  We cannot agree to any list of parties who are
authorized to
  enter into transactions under the contract.  Our position is
that whoever
  answers the trading phone during trading hours is authorized
to bind the
  company.  However, we will provide the City with an initial
contact list of
  the people on the trading floor whom the city can contact as
of the date
  the contract is signed; however, the persons who are
authorized to enter
  into a transaction with the city will not be limited to the
initial contact
  list.  Of course, the city could always attempt to contact
someone on the
  initial contact list.  Will an initial contact list be
acceptable?

  Please let me have your thoughts concerning the above.
                                                     Dan.

                      "Kolling, Grant"

                      <grant_kolling@city.palo-a        To:
"'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"
                      lto.ca.us>
<Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
                                                        cc:

                      03/16/2001 05:09 PM
Subject:     RE: Enfolio Master Firm

Purchase/Sale Agreement

  Dan, please accept my apologies for replying so late.  I was
out of town
  again, and am back at trying to complete 5+ days of work
within 3 days.

  Thanks for accepting a lot of our requests.  Let me follow
up with a couple
  of additional inquiries.

  7.  Re 4.2(iv), please suggest language as you've indicated
in sentence 2.
  Anything along the lines you've proposed likely will be
agreeable.

  8.  Re 4.2(v) and (vi).  How about 20 days?

  13. Definition of "Act."  I suggest you refer to Article 11,
sections 5 and
  9 of the California Constitution, to be more specific.
Section 3 is not
  regularly cited as the line of authority to the best of my
knowledge,
  though
  I can see how the language could lead  one to cite it.

  21.  In California, the concept of binding mediation is not
recognized, if
  I
  have understood our outside counsel at prior mediations in
which I've
  participated.  Mediation is non-binding.  As a practical
matter, it can
  cost
  almost as much in terms of time, money and effort to proceed
to mediation,
  but the "rules of engagement" are not as tight as are found
in arbitration.
  We avoid the rigid procedures.  I believe Enron should
consider this
  approach at times.  Having gone through a couple, I would
not recommend to
  my client that we would proceed any further once the
mediator makes a
  proposal that's acceptable to the parties.  The cost of
arbitration is not
  worth it.  That's why we in California tend to prefer
mediation to
  arbitration.

  22.  I have to insist on behalf of my client that we
assemble some list.
  Surely, Enron can submit a list of people that will be
initially approved
  to
  engage in authorized transactions.  We can do the same.
We've had an
  unfavorable experience with another Texas-based
  energy company regarding the scope of its representative's
authority.  We
  don't want to litigate the issue of due authority.  That
list would help
  It's not a matter of the city claiming the authority to back
out of the
  contract, because someone arguably didn't have the
authority.  There are a
  ton of cases which would make it extremely difficult to make
that claim.

  Thanks.  Grant.
            -----Original Message-----
            From:     Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com
[mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
            Sent:     Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:13 PM
            To:  grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
            Cc:  Kim.Ward@enron.com
            Subject:  RE: Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale
  Agreement

             << File: 2001-002ctr.doc >> << File: 0071988 RESO
Enron.doc
  >>
            (See attached file: 2001-002ctr.doc)

            Grant,
                 I have reviewed your requested changes and
have made
  the changes which
            do not require explanation or clarification.
Those changes
  are reflected
            in the above document.  Let me go over your list
of items:
                 1.   I have deleted the word "DRAFT".
                 2.   I have left a blank for the date within
the month
  of March 2001
            when the contract would be executed by the City.
                 3.   I have changed the word "may" to
"shall".
                 4.   Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity
does not fit
  in a
            Deficiency Default, it is just the maximum
quantity that can
  be handled by
            a party at a particular point.  I do not think
their is an
  omission.
                 5.   I have added the word "reasonable".
                 6.   The procedue for how the Termination
Payment is
  determined is
            provided, if the City disagrees with the method
and values
  provided in the
            statement and is unable to convince the Company to
revise,
  the statement,
            then the issue is to be resolved in arbitration.
At the
  point that a
            Termination Payment calculation is necessary, a
long drawn
  out period
            should not be necessary to attain closure.
                 7.   We need to limit the duration to 30
days,  neither
  party should
            be required to wait 60 days before it could
accelerate the
  other party's
            obligations under the Contract.  We might be able
to add
  language to extend
            the period if we had some documentation stating
the steps
  that a party was
            pursuing to cause the proceeding to be dismissed
and the
  other party was
            otherwise kept whole from a credit exposure.
                 8.   I have kept the 30 days because 5 days
is too
  short a period.
            During a holiday period, one scheduling error
could cover
  the entire
            period.  Article 3 has language which provides a
remedy for
  a party if a
            scheduling default extends for more than 5 days
during any
  month.
                 9.   The reason is because Enron Corp. is the
rated
  entity and no
            separate rating applies to ENA.
                 10.  I have changed "a" to "the"
                 11.  I have eliminated the  60 day limitation
on the
  duration of an
            event of Force Majeure.
                 12.  This merely addressed the possibility of
a
  imbalance amount being
            due when a pipeline aggregates imbalances using
multiple
  points, and the
            language would allocated the payment based on the
amount of
  the imbalance
            that a particular party may have caused.  I think
the
  language is clear as
            written.
                 13.  The definition of Act was one of the
items that I
  had requested
            that you review and complete as necessary so that
all
  appropriate statutes
            were referenced.  I am still waiting for your
language.  I
  started filling
            it in using language that had been provided by the
City.
                 14.  I added the word "reasonable".
                 15.  I have made the requested change
relating to
  GAAAP.
                 16.  This is a late payment provision and as
such a
  believe that the
            provision should be more than a party's rating, as
such I
  have kept the 2%
            over prime language.
                 17.  These amounts were determined by the
credit group
  and any change
            needs to be discussed with that group.  BBB-  is
considered
  investment
            grade and I understand that Enron Corp.'s rating
is BBB.
  ENA is not a
            rated entity and that is why the language relates
to Enron
  Corp.'s rating.
                 18.  The elimination of the opinion of
counsel did not
  change the
            requirements relating to the representations that
we expect
  the City to
            have made.  If the City cannot make these
representations,
  then we need to
            know that before we execute the Contract.
                 19.  I have added the word "reasonable".
                 20.  The party that has the Transport
Agreement with
  the Transporter
            should have the legal right to obtain the
information based
  on its
            contract.
                 21.  It is our position that any dispute be
arbitrated.
  We can agree
            to meditation if we can make the outcome binding
on the
  parties.  I am
            willing to discuss any changed language that you
might care
  to offer.
                 22.  We have found that personnel of both our
Company
  and that of our
            Customers change so rapidily that the list is not
workable
  and merely
            allows a party to back out of transactions it does
not like
  on the basis
            that the person who agreed to such transaction was
not on
  the list.
            Therefore , we object to any listing of approved
parties who
  can transact.
            We believe that each party should be responsible
for the
  actions of its
            employees and should stand behind any transactions
that
  those parties may
            enter into pursuant to the terms and provisions of
the
  Contract.

                 I will be out of the office on Friday, but
will be in
  all next week if
            you care to discuss any of these matters.

                                "Kolling, Grant"

                                <grant_kolling@city.palo-a
To:
  "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"
                                lto.ca.us>
  <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>, "Kolling, Grant"

  <grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>
                                03/02/2001 03:43 PM
cc:
  Kim.Ward@enron.com

  Subject:     RE: Enfolio Master Firm

  Purchase/Sale Agreement

             <<0071988 RESO Enron.doc>>

            Dan:

            First, I've attached the proposed resolution which
  authorizes the City
            Manager to execute the Enfolio agreement.

            More importantly, I need to inform you that our
senior
  management has
            reviewed the referenced contract; I have been
asked to
  present additional
            changes to the agreement for Enron's consideration
and to
  raise questions
            about certain of its terms and conditions.

            Let me start from page 1, top to bottom, and
proceed to the
  end of the
            exhibits.

            1.  There is the word "DRAFT" above the title of
the Enfolio
  agreement
            which
            should be deleted.

            2.  The introductory paragraph, line 5, should not
contain
  the words "1st
            of
            January, 2001."  It should be left blank, until
the parties
  have signed the
            contract.  Otherwise, the City will be in breach
as of the
  date it signs
            the
            contract, because Article 2, section 2.1 requires
the City
  to proffer the
            to-be-approved-by-Council resolution as of 1/1/01.

            3.  Article 2, Section 2.4, line 2.  The City
(Customer)
  wants Enron
            (Company) to confirm every recorded telephonic
Transaction,
  as defined.
            Therefore, the City requests the word "may" should
be
  changed to "shall."

            4.  Article 3, Sections 3.1 and 3.2, first
sentence:
  Buyer's Requested
            Quantity refers to the DCQ or MaxDQ.  Seller's
failure to
  Schedule the
            Buyer's Requested Quantity shall constitute a
Seller's
  Deficiency Default.
            How does a Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity
fit into a
  Seller's
            Deficiency Default if the Buyer's Requested
Quantity does
  not include a
            Maximum Daily Delivery Point Quantity?  What is
the reason
  for the
            omission?

            5.  Article 4, Section 4.1, lines 15 and 23:  Line
23 refers
  to "reasonable
            attorneys' fees" yet line 15 refers to "attorneys'
fees."
  To be internally
            consistent, line 15 should say "reasonable
attorneys' fees."

            6.  Section 4.1, right hand column, lines 3-4.  A
statement
  showing the
            determination of the Termination Payment will be
prepared.
  It's unclear
            whether the City is entitled to review and
challenge the
  determination
            before a dispute is referred to arbitration.  The
City
  should be entitled
            to
            receive a copy of the determination and to
question it
  before it is
            obligated to pay the Termination Payment.  Please
clarify,
  or permit the
            City to exercise these rights.

            7.  Section 4.2(iv) specifies that a Triggering
Event will
  exist if a
            bankruptcy petition is undismissed within 30 days.
Is this
  (under
            bankruptcy laws) the minimum period of time within
which one
  may seek
            dismissal of a bankruptcy petition?  Please refer
to the 11
  USC section
            that
            backs up this provision, or change to 60 days.

            8.  Section 4.2(v) and (vi):  Please change "30
days" to "5
  days."  The
            City
            is concerned with the number of days that Enron
may be
  permitted to fail to
            Schedule before a Triggering Event is triggered by
Enron.

            9.  Section 4.2(ix):  this language discusses a
default by
  Enron Corp.
            (ENA's parent?), but no mention is made of ENA's
default in
  this regard?
            Please explain.

            10. Section 4.5, line 4:  Is "a Company" supposed
to refer
  to "the Company"
            ?

            11. Article 5.  The City is uncomfortable with the
force
  majeure provision
            as drafted.  It states that the parties must
perform even if
  a FM event
            (earthquake) would prevent either or both parties
from
  performing with the
            60-day period stated therein.  There is no such
limitation
  under California
            law in the absence of a contract provision to the
contrary.

            12.  Article 7, Section 7.2:  Could Enron
translate the last
  sentence?  We
            don't understand it.

            13.  Appendix "1":  Act:  Please explain why
Section 3 is
  referred to?

            14.  Appendix "1", Claims, line 4:  Please add
"reasonable"
  before
            "attorneys' fees.

             15.  Appendix "1", GAAP:  This should read: "GAAP
means
  generally accepted
            accounting principles, consistently applied, with
respect to
  Company, and
            governmental generally accepted accounting
principles,
  consistently
            applied,
            with respect to Customer."

            16.  Appendix "1", Interest Rate:  Please delete
"two
  percent over".  The
            City has a AAA bond rating, therefore, the  City
believes
  the 2% over prime
            should not apply to it.

            17.  Appendix "1", Material Adverse Change:  What
does Enron
  believe the
            City's Net Worth to be?  The $400 million
threshold is
  mentioned.  Also,
            what is ENA's bond rating?  Is "BBB-" an
investment grade
  rating?

            18.  Representations and Warranties:  Because we
have agreed
  that the
            opinion of counsel will not be required, the reps
and
  warranties are being
            deleted.  But the "Representations and Warranties"
is
  nevertheless included
            in the agreement.  Item (i) should be deleted,
because the
  City has not
            undertaken a court search as is our custom and
practice
  whenever we issue
            an
            opinion.  We would like to delete "and (vii) it is
not ...
  Party."

            19.  Operational Flow Orders, line 8:  Please add
  "reasonable" before
            "attorneys' fees."

            20.  Financial Matters, line 8:  What is meant by
"to the
  extent it has a
            legal right of access thereto and/or ...etc."

            21.  Arbitration, Disputes to be Arbitrated.  We
do not as a
  matter of
            legal
            policy agree to arbitration, but we will mediate
disputes.
  Is Enron
            amenable to mediation?  This process is less
formal and less
  costly in my
            opinion.

            22.  Authority for Transactions.  Staff would like
the
  Agreement to include
            a list of employees for Company and Customer who
are
  authorized to trade on
            behalf of their employers.  Could a statement be
added to
  this section to
            this effect?  Then, we could attach the list(s) as
an
  Exhibit C.

            Thank you so much for considering these issues.
There are
  others which I
            hope to receive from staff next week and which I
will
  forward to you for
            response.

            Look forward to hearing from you soon.  I will be
out of
  town after today
            until Wednesday, March 7.

            Sincerely,

            Grant Kolling
                      -----Original Message-----
                      From:     Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com
  [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
                      Sent:     Tuesday, February 27, 2001
6:16 AM
                      To:  grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us
                      Cc:  Kim.Ward@enron.com
                      Subject:  Re:  Enfolio Master Firm
Purchase/Sale
            Agreement

                       << File: 2001-002ctr.doc >>
                      (See attached file: 2001-002ctr.doc)

                      Grant,
                           I have incorporated the language
you provided
  to me in
            the attached
                      document.  I have been informed by the
Corporate
  Secretary's
            office that
                      they will issue a Certificate of
Incumbency
  showing that the
            person
                      executing the contract for ENA is
authorized to
  execute
            contracts for ENA.
                      No other party signs as to form or
terms, however,
  the
            officer executing
                      for ENA will require that the deal
person and I
  initial on
            the line next to
                      his signature.  I have reviewed the
proposed draft
            resolution.  ENA will
                      accept the enacted resolution and will
not require
  that the
            City Attorney
                      issue an opinion.  If the attached
contract is
  acceptable,
            please print off
                      2 originals, have them approved, signed
and
  forward to me
            for ENA's
                      approval and signature.  Once the
contract is
  fully
            executed, I will return
                      one fully executed original to you for
the City's
  file.

            (See attached file: 0071988 RESO Enron.doc)


thats fine. come to my desk or 32c2. i have a meeting there at 3pm.

From:	Zhiyong Wei/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/22/2001 08:48 AM
To:	Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	RE: V3

Geoff,

How about 4:00 pm today?

Zhiyong

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Storey, Geoff
Sent:	Thursday, March 22, 2001 8:15 AM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Subject:	V3

We need to have a meeting regarding version 3.

Let me know when you have time?
I dont want a 10 person meeting. Just you and myself.

geof


Doug Reiner with Williamette will be available at the following number over
the weekend:

541-396-3951

Thanks,
JMF


Gracias, amigo. No te preocupes, te boy a llamar, no estoy miedo de tiempo diferencia

 Vladi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Christian Silva <csilva@uamericas.edu.ec>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Christian+20Silva+20+3Ccsilva+40uamericas+2Eedu+2Eec+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:51 PM
To:	Pimenov, Vladi
Subject:	Re: FELIZ CUMPLEANOS AMIGO RUSO

Vladi:

I forgot one thing. My phone number is the same but here these guys added a 2 so, it will be
Country code: 593
City Code: 2
Phone: 2 236 898 (the same but with another 2)

The cell phone is:
Country code: 593
Cell phone code: 9
Phone: 9 881316

Anyways, dont bother to call, i understand that there is a time difference too, so enjoy your vacation, we
will talk later.

Chris

Vladi.Pimenov@enron.com wrote:

> that's the right number
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   Christian Silva <csilva@uamericas.edu.ec>@ENRON
>              [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Christian+20Silva+20+3Ccsilva+40uamericas+2Eedu+2Eec+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>    Sent:   Monday, October 01, 2001 5:26 PM
>    To:     Pimenov, Vladi
>    Subject:  Re: FELIZ CUMPLEANOS AMIGO RUSO
>
>    Perfect, i will give you a call at ten. I hope it is the same time here
>    than there. Amigo, hata la noche entonces. A caballo.
>
>    713 993 0067
>
>    Vladi.Pimenov@enron.com wrote:
>
>    > thank you very much Chrisito!!!
>    >
>    > I should be home at around 9-10 o'clock
>    > we'll just go to a restaurant with Natalie today, the the big party is
>    > tomorrow. And I'm leaving to Moscow on thursday
>    >
>    > A caballo!!!
>    >
>    > Tu amigo Vladi
>    >
>    >     -----Original Message-----
>    >    From:   Christian Silva <csilva@uamericas.edu.ec>@ENRON
>    >
>    [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Christian+20Silva+20+3Ccsilva+40uamericas+2Eedu+2Eec+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>    >
>    >    Sent:   Monday, October 01, 2001 4:13 PM
>    >    To:     Pimenov, Vladi; Vladislav Pimenov
>    >    Subject:  FELIZ CUMPLEANOS AMIGO RUSO
>    >
>    >    Mi amigo ruso:
>    >
>    >    Receive my best wishes in this day of your birthday. I`ve tried to
>    >    contact you through the messenger but the
>    >    connection is broken here at the university. I hope they
>    reestablish the
>    >    connection before five. I havent
>    >    forget about your birthday. At what time are you gonna be at home
>    >    tonight to give you a friendly call. Dont
>    >    consider you are old if your spirit and soul is young, you always
>    keep
>    >    young. Celebrate with a giant party
>    >    today and remember i never forget the good and sincere friend you
>    are.
>    >
>    >    Your humble friend, a caballote!!!!!
>    >
>    >    Chris
>    >
>    > **********************************************************************
>    > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
>    affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
>    sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
>    disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>    recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
>    the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
>    enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
>    message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be
>    an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
>    enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and
>    the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by
>    anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
>    > **********************************************************************


David:
Enclosed is a new draft of the Kennecott amendment letter.  Mark and I have
discussed the counterparty termination language and have come up with the
language that I have high;lighted.  Upon your approval, I plan to use the
same language for the Duke and Cinnergy letters.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


Hi Guys

I was wondering if you have a further update on the due diligence status of
Brazil and Columbia.

Look forward to hearing from you.

Regards

Amita
---------------------- Forwarded by Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT on 12/12/2000 18:56
---------------------------
From: Justin Rostant on 11/12/2000 20:14
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Carlos Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron, Naveed
Ahmed/NA/Enron@Enron, Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julie
Ferrara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Connelly/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael Bridges/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Althaus/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: New Products and Country for week ending 12/08/00

Attached is the updated report for New Products and New Countries for the
week ending 12/08/2000
Regards
jr
3-6460


-----Original Message-----
From: Lankford, Glenn [mailto:Glenn.Lankford@natoil.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:21 PM
To: Larry Barnhill (E-mail); Larry Childs (E-mail); Jack Boone; Earsom,
Roger; Mike Griffith; Klaurens, Sarah; Alice Lankford (E-mail); Davin
Lankford (E-mail); Jackie Larson (E-mail); Vlad Railian (E-mail); Anna
Rowland (E-mail); Kevin Strabala (E-mail); Dan Taylor (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Pledge of Allegiance

Glenn Lankford

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cheatwood, Brenda
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:05 PM
To:	Lankford, Glenn; Buxton, Dana
Subject:	FW: Pledge of Allegiance

Brenda Cheatwood

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jefferson, Joy
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:02 PM
To:	'JJEFFX5@AOL.COM'; Earsom, Roger; Cheatwood, Brenda
Subject:	FW: Pledge of Allegiance

THIS IS GOOD....
JOY

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jefferson, Joy G
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:58 PM
To:	Jefferson, Joy
Subject:	FW: Pledge of Allegiance

Joy G. Jefferson

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perewernycky, Lioubov
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:31 AM
To:	'C.MUCINEKO'; 'DEBBIE'; 'Donna@marsh'; 'Helena H';
'kbohdan@cirrealtors.com'; 'Magda'; 'Oksana Dawid'; 'Raymond'; 'S.Iwasyk';
'Pete S'; Crouse, Joanne
Subject:	FW: Pledge of Allegiance

Luba Perewernycky
Customer Service Representative
Ph. (403)294-4559
Fax (403)294-5299
Email: lioubov.perewernycky@natoil.com
<mailto:lioubov.perewernycky@natoil.com>

-----Original Message-----
From:	Kochanowsky, Terry [SMTP:Terry.Kochanowsky@canada.weatherford.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:Terry.Kochanowsky@canada.weatherford.com]>
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:28 AM
To:	Ballow, Janis; Cochran, Terry; Chan, Eliza; 'DESJARLAIS, RUTH';
'DONALDSON, ED & MARCI'; 'DUNCAN, TOM'; 'GADWA, ERNEST & KATHLEEN'; 'HY-TEK
RESOURCES'; Johnson, Jerry; McLaren, Ray; Perewernycky, Lioubov; 'PRESTIGE
SIGNS'; Sartain, Susan; Sheets, Betty; Whitfield, Paula
Subject:	FW: Pledge of Allegiance

-----Original Message-----
From:	Melin, Darwin
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:13 AM
To:	'Donna & Noel Schulte'; 'Joan Pitman'; 'MELINDA'; Kochanowsky,
	Terry; 'The Ibles'; 'Thelma Rube'; Dooley, Wayne
Subject:	FW: Pledge of Allegiance

	Darwin Melin
	Topco Sales
	e-mail darwin.melin@canada.weatherford.com
<mailto:darwin.melin@canada.weatherford.com>
<mailto:darwin.melin@canada.weatherford.com
<mailto:darwin.melin@canada.weatherford.com> >
	Office 1-780-436-3400
	Direct line 1-780-430-3403
	Cell  1-780-916-8532
	Fax 1-780-436-3659
	Office Toll Free 1-800-222-6448
	Fax Toll Free   1-888-867-2626

Since the Pledge of  Allegiance and The Lord's Prayer are not allowed in
most public schools  anymore because the word "God" is mentioned....a kid in
Arizona wrote the  attached NEW School prayer.  I liked it....
	Now I sit me down  in school
	Where praying is against the rule
	For this great nation under  God
	Finds mention of Him very odd.
	If Scripture now the class recites,
	It violates the Bill of Rights.
	and anytime my head I bow
	Becomes a Federal matter now.

	Our hair can be purple, orange or  green,
	That's no offense; it's a freedom scene.
	The law is specific, the law is precise.
	Prayers spoken aloud are a serious vice.

	For praying in a public hall
	Might offend someone with no faith at all.
	In silence alone we must meditate,
	God's name is prohibited by the state.

	We're allowed to cuss and dress like freaks,
	And pierce our noses, tongues and cheeks.
	They've outlawed guns, but FIRST the Bible.
	To quote the Good Book makes me liable.

	We can elect a pregnant Senior Queen,
	And the 'unwed daddy,' our Senior King.
	It's "inappropriate" to teach right from wrong,
	We're taught that such "judgments" do not belong.

	We can get our condoms and birth controls,
	Study witchcraft, vampires and totem poles.
	But the Ten Commandments are not allowed,
	No word of God must reach this  crowd.

	It's scary here I must confess,
	When chaos reigns the school's  a mess.
	So, Lord, this silent plea I make:
	Should I be shot; My soul please take!
	Amen
If you aren't ashamed to do this, please pass this on.  Jesus said, " If you
are ashamed of me," I will be ashamed of you  before my Father."
Not ashamed. Passing this on.


Forgive the rough formatting, but this is a rush report...

My analysis- it is significant that both Dems and Repubs are talking about 30
percent haircuts, but there is not yet an agreement on what to do with the
transmission lines.

RJ

Source X reports the following regarding the Republican Plan B
proposal:

- Encourage direct access for consumers.  (The problem with this, however,
is that these direct access deals would not have a dedicated rate component,
and too many might undermine the cash flow and credit worthiness of the
bonds.)
- The Republicans will "suggest" that generators take a 30% haircut.  "We
think this is doable."
- The Republicans strongly oppose purchasing the transmission assets.
- Restore the invetor-owned utility model for generation.  They would
establish a dedicated rate component for construction of native generation
by the utilities.  They would grant ratepayers equity interest in these
plants.
- Resolve the QFs' financial issues.

- Assemblyman Cox commented afterward that the Republcans have been trying
to work on a bilateral basis with the Democrats on these issues, but they
feel "frozen out."  Moreover, he senses the Democrats moving back toward
having an option to purchase SoCal's transmission assets, which the
Republicans oppose.

Source reports the following regarding the Democratic Plan B:

- The Democrats are formulating a Plan B that incorporates the Governor's
MOU, the Nation Plan B and other ideas that they have.  This plan reportedly
has not yet been introduced into the legislature yet because it is still
being finalized and the Democrats are not certain that it will work.
Specifically, the option to purchase SoCal's transmission assets is
reportedly still being debated.  Some Democrats reportedly believe that this
may be unnecessary.

- The details of the plan are reportedly as follows:

- Set aside the $3.1 bilion undercollect in a separate account funded by a
dedicated rate component.
- The generators can either get a check instantly from the bonds for 70% of
their claim or they can try to get up to 100% of their claim adjudicated
through a dispute.
- This plan could be used as a template for going to the bankruptcy judge to
strike a deal for PG&E.

- Sources indicate that the Democrats are developing a post-petition plan in
cast SoCal files for bankruptcy, including the following:

- The state would buy both utilities out of bankruptcy.  It then would sell
of pieces of the utilities to various private-sector buyers, but with a
lifetime stipulation on how they will be run.
- Some Democrats reportedly believe the state could do this with as little
as $5 billion if it assumed the utilities' debt and got a cram-down by the
bankrutpcy judge to quell the protests against such a plan that would very
likely erupt.  Democrats reportedly believe that the Judge Montali would
support this idea.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000
07:11 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           09/27/2000 12:53 PM

To: Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Craig
Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT, Ross Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell
Dyk/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Shipos/HOU/ECT@ECT, jaime.williams@enron.com,
Agustin Perez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan Wood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT,
Bill Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Caroline
Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Troy Black/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron,
Sabina Rank/NA/Enron@Enron, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vikas
Dwivedi/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Chicago Presentation - Basis/Northeast Markets

Thsi is WEFA's speech for next week. It goes the AECO /HH/Chicago stuff and
some MNE.
 - NAPC_WEFA_10_2000.ppt


The following are the NEW (**) and significantly UPDATED (*) items on this
report:

IOWA
*  HF 2247 - Pipeline construction land restoration - repeal of exemption
-Passed House, sent to Senate

KANSAS
*  SB 571 - Pipeline tax to fund producer Kansas ad valorem tax refunds -
Hearing and meeting set for Mar. 13th

MINNESOTA
*  E,G999/DI-99-1073 - MN DOC investigation into energy restructuring -
Workshops - NNG filed comment letter

WISCONSIN
*  6650-CG-194 - Wisconsin Gas Co. Guardian lateral project - NNG filed
objection to ALJ ruling on party status


runs or robs?


Please delete the referenced meetings from your calendars.  It is no longer
necessary to have this meeting on Thursdays, from 11:00 to 11:30 AM.

Thank you.


At your earliest convenience, please send me comments on Staci's performance for this year.  Thanks!

	--Dot


I just heard the best value beer at the new stadium is the "Half-Yard"!  I'll
take dos.


Please decrease deliveries to Eastrans to 0 MMBtu/dy effective 11/15/00 and
maintain at 0 until further notified.

The redeliveries will be 0 as well.

The Fuels Cotton Valley gas will not be priced per the Transaction
Agreement for 11/15/00 - 11/30/00.  This gas will be sold to HPL at
$5.60/MMBtu in a separate gas purchase agreement.


I still need to get with you.  I will be out Monday afternoon, but could meet any other afternoon next week.  The job change has been invigorating and very enjoyable.  I really appreciate this opportunity.  Let me know when you are available.

Frank W Vickers
04/13/2001 11:06 AM
To:	John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	Review

John, thanks for your review.  I have completed the form and at you convenience we can get together and put it to bed.  Let me know when.

Thanks

Frank


I am waiting for an answer back from Elizabeth, but was wondering if you or any of your contacts might know the answer to the following.

Thanks,
Stacey
-----Original Message-----
From: White, Stacey W.
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:06 PM
To: Sager, Elizabeth
Subject: RE: Non-terminated Power Transactions

One question:  I had Melissa Murphy put together the termination dates for each of the counterparties and was wondering if you could clarify something for me.  If a termination date is 12/4/2001, do I move 12/4 forward to the bankrupt book or do I move 12/5 forward to the bankrupt book?

Thanks,
Stacey

-----Original Message-----
From: Sager, Elizabeth
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 8:39 PM
To: White, Stacey W.
Subject: RE: Non-terminated Power Transactions

Thanks Stacey for all the hard work in putting this together- this list is great.  I  met with the East group today and the West group on Tuesday to review.  We may have questions but  .... thanks again.

-----Original Message-----
From: White, Stacey W.
Sent: Sun 12/9/2001 4:30 PM
To: Sager, Elizabeth; St. Clair, Carol; Bradford, William S.; Fallon, Jim
Cc: Postlethwaite, John; Evans, Casey
Subject: Non-terminated Power Transactions

The following spreadsheet is a consolidation of counterparties that have not turned in termination letters.  I have also attached the list of terminations so that you can see the list we used.  If there are other counterparties that you know of that have not appeared on these lists, let me know and we will move them to the 'Bankruptcy Portfolio' we have set up.

<<Non-Terminated Counterparties as of 12-7-2001.xls>> <<Financial Power Terminated.xls>> <<Physical Power Terminated.xls>>

Please let me know what other details you need and we will be happy to provide.

Thanks,
Stacey White
Director Power Risk Management
713-853-1870


I have a morning appointment and will be in afterwards.  Sara


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Marcantel MM (Mitch)" <MMMarcantel@equiva.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Marcantel+20MM+20+28Mitch+29+22+20+3CMMMarcantel+40equiva+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2001 9:27 AM
To:	'val.generes@accenture.com'; Lenhart, Matthew; Mena, Luis
Subject:	FW:  Test

I scored 19 (90%)...and I'm disappointed in my performance! Let's see if you
any of you can top it.

Use discretion when opening

 - Breast Test 2.xls


Hey there!

Just wanted to see if you got to work okay!  Guess who was up in our studios
this morning????  Yep, you guessed it Deblah Morgan.  She is actually a
really young singer and she is more on the Hip Hop side of the music
business.  Anyway, I actually would have never known who she was unless
someone had told me.

So, what are you thinking about tonight.  Do you want to see if Eric and Jenn
and David and whoever else want to meet downtown at Salintes?

Also, were you being serious about China?  I really would consider it, but I
need to get more details about dates, etc.  I actually think that would be so
much fun.  Now you're sitting there saying, "crap, why did I bring that
up...I was just kidding around!"


Cassandra and Cheryl,
 ECT Investments, Inc. has an existing executing broker relationship with
Sanford Bernstein.  The electonic agreement will provide ECT Investments with
an alternative medium in order flow.  Also, ENA currently does not have an
executing broker agreement with Sanford Bernstein and would like to establish
one for both research access and order flow.

Thanks,
Theresa


ISC - Customer Service Survey Ticket#HD0000000695465, Password Reset XMS

: Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Customer Service Survey.
Your input is crucial to our continued efforts in establishing and providing you with World Class Support.

Please take a minute and complete the 5 question survey then submit it back to us when you are done.

Once again, thank you for your participation.

ISC Customer Care Group

http://rc.enron.com/survey/survey_1.asp?id=000000000004766


---------------------- Forwarded by Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001
03:13 PM ---------------------------

"Bruce Kohrs" <Bruce_Kohrs@keyspancanada.com> on 04/03/2001 01:06:43 PM
To: dan.j.hyvl@enron.com, <patrice.l.mims@enron.com>
cc: hunters.shively@enron.com, grant.oh@enron.com,
Brian_Houghton/CRESTAR1/Crestar_Energy%Exchange
<Brian_Houghton@keyspancanada.com>,
Michael_Kleiner/CRESTAR1/Crestar_Energy%Exchange
<Michael_Kleiner@keyspancanada.com>, "Jim Pearson"
<Jim_Pearson@keyspancanada.com>, williakh@bp.com
Subject: Crestar AOS assignment to BP

Dan, Grant Oh suggested I e-mail you directly to notify you of a change
that BP needs included. BP states they need to have the volumes/contract
number information back from Enron via e-mail by 9:45am MST in order to
place nominations by 10:30am MST for the Timely Cycle. If for whatever
reason Enron cannot provide the volume/contract number information by
9:45am or Enron fails to take the scheduled volume agreed to at 9:00am; and
BP incurs any penalty costs including the price difference between the
Enron price and the replacement price, then Enron should be liable for
these costs NOT Gulf. I suggest the following options:

1) Put back in the default contract number in the Enron/Crestar agreement
as we had last week, this way if Enron fails to notify by 9:45am, then
Crestar/BP can nominate to the default contract number and Enron can change
the contract numbers internally.
2) Add a clause to either the Enron agreement or the Gulf assignment
agreement to state if Enron fails to inform and/or take, then any penalty
costs/price difference incurred by Crestar/BP shall be passed onto Enron.

Please advise what Enron's position is and how we should proceed.
------

Bruce Kohrs
Phone: (403)205-7684
Fax: (403)266-1947
e-mail:bruce_kohrs@keyspancanada.com