Notice # 02-19
January 10, 2002

TO:	All NYMEX Division Members
			All NYMEX Division Clearing Members
			All COMEX Division Members
			All COMEX Division Clearing Members

FROM:		J. Robert Collins, Jr., President

RE:			NYMEX ACCESS
 Session to Close at 9 AM on Friday

==============================================================

There will be no Henry Hub natural gas swap trading on NYMEX ACCESS

session after 9 AM on Friday, January 11, so that maintenance can be
performed on the system.

Tomorrow's allocation periods will be from 8 AM to 8:30 AM for metals
traders and 9 AM to 9:30 AM for energy traders; and the clearing member
allocation periods will be from 8:30 AM to 9:30 AM for the metals markets
and 9:30 AM to 10:30 AM for the energy markets.


Friends and co-workers:

 I have accepted a job trading next-day power in the Entergy region effective
January 2nd.      I will be reporting directly  to Rogers Herndon and,
ultimately,   Kevin Presto.        This move gives me the chance to be closer
to family and an opportunity to further develop my trading skills.      This
would not have been possible without  the tremendous opportunities that were
available to me during my three year stay in Portland.

I would like to thank the entire floor for their help in making the Real Time
& also the Services Desk a success this year.       The decision to leave was
extremely hard,   given this level of support.

 I am confident that next year will be a great one for each of you and I wish
you luck in your careers at the Big E!

Thanks,

JMF


One of the World Hunger issues is that GE does  not want Enron to be able to
issue a unilateral change order which would impact the manufacturing schedule.

We have the same issue in the Arcos Power Island deal.

Following is what I intend to propose to solve the Arcos problem and might
work  for World Hunger:

" Purchaser acknowledges taht Seller's ability to accomodate changes in
manufacturing scope in a timely or cost effective manner diminish as Seller
gets further along into the manufacturing process, and after a point changes
can only be made after assembly completion or in the field without adversely
affecting Seller's manufacturing obligations to other clients (a "Client
Impact").  Where such a Client Impact circumstance exists, Seller shall
identify such constraints to Purchaser in its proposal submitted pursuant to
Clause 17.2.(b) [time and cost estimate to accomodate the Change
Order-Variation Order], which Purchaser shall take into account in evaluating
Seller's proposed cost and time changes arising out of such Variation scope
change. "

I would appreciate your thoughts as to whether this works for us in the World
Hunger document-  I do  not want to propose for Arcos if it gives you great
difficultly for World Hunger.


Lavo,

I'm in for dinner tonight for sure and golf Sun a.m. if you're able.  Oh
EOG...how I love thee!  +2 1/4

Fletch


Daren,

I would like for these sessions to be separate, only because my group is
probably at a different level than Lisa's in terms of understanding the
business (not that we understand it in its entirety).  The last week of this
month or the first week of March prior to the 6th workday is good for my
group(s).  Let me know.  Thanks!

Daren J Farmer
02/17/2000 05:02 PM
To: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HPL System Training

Rita and Lisa,

Why don't ya'll get together and determine a range of days/times that would
work for your groups to have a training session.  (Over lunch or early
afternoon)  If you are interested, I would like to discuss how we operate the
HPL system and the processes we go through during the trading day.  To help
with the discussion, I have maps which highlight the main points and areas
where we transact.  (There will be a few for you to keep at the desks.)

I did this with the Logistics group.  I think it went pretty well.  If you
want to do this, we need to allow 1.5 to 2 hours to talk about everything.
Let me know.

D


Demand charges are showing up now.  We still have a problem with the 9th (4500 @ $5.445), this should not be on the invoice.  My Transco scheduler has informed me that they have taken the volume to 0 in Unify and that this item will need to be "actualized" 0 by volume management.  I don't know how that part works.

Dara, are you volume manangement??
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 09:21 AM ---------------------------

Darla Saucier@ENRON
05/09/2001 01:14 PM
To:	Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: Oglethorpe invoice for April

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Here's my list - NB for the credit products we will only give approvals if we
are asked to look at specific counterparties for trading that product.
Thanks, Edmund

From: Tana Jones on 05/11/2000 06:08 PM CDT
To: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: country approvals

I have lots of blanks on my approvals on the attached list for several
European products.  If you know any of the answers, can you please just hand
write them in and fax them back to me, or email a more recent list you might
that addresses the European approvals.  Much thanks.


Will you agree to $.05 on the penalty?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Attached are the ClickPaper approvals for October 17, 2000.  Thanks.

Walter


Dear, vshannon
Great Info.  Now Here is ours.

     http://paylesssites.com/workfromhome15/index.html

    Join ordinary people working at home
making up to $1000 - $5000 monthly

   ENVELOPE STUFFING AND MORE...
  Did You Know you can get our list of work at
home jobs that is updated constantly with  IT
positions, Clerical positions, Envelope Stuffing
and Assembly positions, Web Designers, Graphic
Artists, Translators, etc...

  WORK FOR COMPANIES LIKE:
     IBM, AT&T, Amtrack, Apple Computers,
Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Citibank,  Aetna, Allstate,
American Express, Honeywell,  Bell South, etc...
Fortune 500 companies that offer work at home
jobs.

   We give you a  listing of Fortune 500
companies and Major Corporations looking
for homeworkers - Get Yours Today!
 ACCESS TO A Database of 50,000+ Jobs!
 WORK AT HOME OPPORTUNITIES

   The "Ultimate Home Employment Directory"

   ~ Genuine Companies Need You ~
       Make Money Fast

    Work At Home - Make Up To $1200.00 Per Week Fast
This Is NOT MLM!  These are REAL Companies
looking for home workers now!

   Let Us Help Place You in a Position

    YES, we give you a  listing of Fortune 500
companies and Major Corporations looking
for homeworkers - Get Yours Today!

   The "Ultimate Home Employment Directory",

 [I found this in the Web Yellowpages search
engine and am now selling it myself.]
For more free information go to my website at:

   http://paylesssites.com/workfromhome15/index.html

      Removal Option:
This message is emailed speech without prejudice.
If you desire to be removed from our email list simply
Email: <plush2017@yahoo.com>  With "Remove Me" in the
Subject.


=================================================================
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES' CLICK 'N SAVE E-MAIL UPDATE
February 5, 2002

=================================================================
GOVERNMENT-IMPOSED SEPTEMBER 11TH SECURITY FEE
=================================================================
Effective for travel purchased on or after February 1, 2002, the
government will impose a September 11th Security Fee on all
tickets including Award Tickets and Companion Pass travel.

To get the lastest information including airport arrival times
and curbside luggage checkin please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/travelAdvisory.html

=================================================================
THIS WEEK'S SPECIALS
=================================================================
1. Click 'n Save Specials for purchase through February 7, 2002
2. Friends Fly Free - Long Island/Islip, NY to/from Providence, RI
3. Dollar Rent A Car Weekly Rate and Extra Rapid Rewards Credit Offer
4. Subscriber Information

=================================================================
CLICK 'N SAVE SPECIALS
=================================================================
Albany, NY
 $34 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $99 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS
 $89 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL
 $59 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Albuquerque, NM
 $69 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $99 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Amarillo, TX
 $75 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $76 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Austin, TX
 $75 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $48 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $45 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $53 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $99 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA

Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $34 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $34 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $63 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $34 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH
 $34 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
 $99 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $99 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Birmingham, AL
 $99 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $99 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $89 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $34 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY
 $34 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $34 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $99 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

Boise, ID
 $89 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $45 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $34 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $34 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA

Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $34 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $99 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS
 $89 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL

Burbank, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $46 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Chicago Midway, IL
 $63 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $34 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $89 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $50 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $34 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY
 $89 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
 $53 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $89 one-way, to/from Providence, RI
 $44 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO

Cleveland, OH
 $34 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $99 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $99 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $54 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
 $99 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Corpus Christi, TX
 $48 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $99 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $58 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX

Dallas Love Field, TX
 $69 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $45 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $58 one-way, to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $68 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $44 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $44 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $44 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX
 $44 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $34 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Detroit, MI
 $99 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $34 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $67 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $99 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $51 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO

El Paso, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $99 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $68 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA
 $71 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA

Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $34 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $34 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL
 $34 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $99 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $89 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS
 $99 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $99 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $99 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $34 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $89 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $99 one-way, to/from Jackson, MS
 $99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $61 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
 $99 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL
 $61 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $99 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $44 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $66 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $67 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $68 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Houston Hobby, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $34 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $44 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $66 one-way, to/from Little Rock, AR
 $89 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $67 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $99 one-way, to/from Providence, RI
 $99 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $99 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
 $68 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Indianapolis, IN
 $55 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $99 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $99 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

Jackson, MS
 $99 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $99 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $89 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA

Jacksonville, FL
 $89 one-way, to/from Buffalo/Niagara Falls, NY
 $34 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $48 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
 $34 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Kansas City, MO
 $50 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $55 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $99 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
 $44 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $99 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL
 $99 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $99 one-way, to/from Providence, RI
 $99 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $34 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO

Las Vegas, NV
 $99 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $99 one-way, to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $34 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA

Little Rock, AR
 $99 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH
 $99 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
 $99 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $66 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $66 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $89 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $69 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY
 $69 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $99 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL

Los Angeles, CA
 $89 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $99 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $46 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX
 $45 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Louisville, KY
 $34 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $34 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $69 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $34 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO

Lubbock, TX
 $53 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $44 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ

Manchester, NH
 $89 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $64 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $44 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV

Nashville, TN
 $89 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $53 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $67 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $89 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $44 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $69 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $99 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Providence, RI
 $89 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

New Orleans, LA
 $99 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $99 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $71 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia
 $61 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $48 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $64 one-way, to/from Manchester, NH
 $48 one-way, to/from Orlando, FL
 $63 one-way, to/from Providence, RI

Oakland, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $89 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $46 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $46 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA
 $55 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $99 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX
 $53 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
 $59 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Oklahoma City, OK
 $99 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH
 $99 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $67 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $67 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $48 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO

Omaha, NE
 $99 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $34 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO
 $99 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Ontario, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $46 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA

Orlando, FL
 $89 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $34 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $99 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $99 one-way, to/from Long Island/Islip, NY
 $48 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia

Phoenix, AZ
 $34 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $99 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Birmingham, AL
 $99 one-way, to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $99 one-way, to/from Lubbock, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $99 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $99 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Portland, OR
 $34 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $55 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $51 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $68 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $99 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
 $54 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA
 $99 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Providence, RI
 $89 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $99 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $63 one-way, to/from Norfolk, VA/Southern Virginia

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $59 one-way, to/from Albany, NY
 $61 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $99 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $45 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $51 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $64 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA

Sacramento, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA
 $53 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA

Salt Lake City, UT
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $68 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $68 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

San Antonio, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $76 one-way, to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Baltimore Washington Int'l, MD
 $71 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $71 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $99 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $99 one-way, to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $99 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA

San Diego, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from El Paso, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $53 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $53 one-way, to/from Sacramento, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from San Antonio, TX
 $53 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

San Jose, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Austin, TX
 $46 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $45 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $46 one-way, to/from Ontario, CA
 $54 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $53 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
 $59 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Seattle/Tacoma, WA
 $34 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $99 one-way, to/from Burbank, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $59 one-way, to/from Oakland, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from Phoenix, AZ
 $68 one-way, to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $99 one-way, to/from San Diego, CA
 $59 one-way, to/from San Jose, CA
 $34 one-way, to/from Spokane, WA
 $99 one-way, to/from Tucson, AZ

Spokane, WA
 $34 one-way, to/from Boise, ID
 $34 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $64 one-way, to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $34 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

St. Louis, MO
 $44 one-way, to/from Chicago Midway, IL
 $54 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH
 $45 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
 $51 one-way, to/from Detroit, MI
 $99 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $34 one-way, to/from Kansas City, MO
 $34 one-way, to/from Louisville, KY
 $48 one-way, to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $34 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $45 one-way, to/from Tulsa, OK

Tampa Bay, FL
 $34 one-way, to/from Ft. Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL
 $99 one-way, to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $34 one-way, to/from Jacksonville, FL
 $34 one-way, to/from West Palm Beach, FL

Tucson, AZ
 $34 one-way, to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $34 one-way, to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $99 one-way, to/from New Orleans, LA
 $99 one-way, to/from Omaha, NE
 $99 one-way, to/from Portland, OR
 $99 one-way, to/from Seattle/Tacoma, WA

Tulsa, OK
 $99 one-way, to/from Cleveland, OH
 $99 one-way, to/from Columbus, OH
 $34 one-way, to/from Dallas Love Field, TX
 $99 one-way, to/from Harlingen/South Padre Island, TX
 $68 one-way, to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental, TX
 $68 one-way, to/from Houston Hobby, TX
 $45 one-way, to/from St. Louis, MO

West Palm Beach, FL
 $89 one-way, to/from Nashville, TN
 $34 one-way, to/from Tampa Bay, FL

=================================================================
IMPORTANT DETAILS
=================================================================
*Available only on southwest.com.
*21-day advance purchase required.
*Available on published, scheduled service.
*Fares shown are one-way and do not include federal
 excise tax of up to $3.00 for each flight segment.
 (a segment is defined as a takeoff and landing)
*Fares do not include airport-assessed passenger facility
 charges (PFC) of up to $9 and government-imposed September 11th
 Security Fee of up to $5 one-way.
*Fares are nonrefundable, but (except for tickets
 purchased through our Group Tickets Program)
 may be applied toward future travel on Southwest Airlines.
*Travel February 26 through June 7, 2002, except May 24,
 and 27, 2002.
*Purchase through February 7, 2002,  midnight Pacific Time.
*Fares are available one-way or can be combined
 with other fare types.  Most restrictive rules of combined
 fares will apply.
*Penalty applies to any changes made after purchasing
 Southwest Internet Specials.
*Orange County, CA is not included in this sale.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/jp/hotfares2.shtml?src=e020502

=================================================================
FRIENDS FLY FREE
=================================================================
Long Island/Islip, NY to/from Providence, RI for $49 each way
and bring a friend for FREE!

*Travel February 8, 2002 through end of schedule.
*Purchase February 5, 2002 through May 23, 2002, midnight
 Pacific Time.
*Fare is each way with roundtrip purchase.
*Fare does not include a federal excise tax of $3.00 per takeoff
 and landing for the fare-paying Customer.
*Fare does not include airport-assessed passenger facility
 charges (PFC) of $6 and government-imposed September 11th
 Security Fee of up to $5 roundtrip, per person.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/fff.html?src=e020502

=================================================================
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
=================================================================
Additional information you need to know about all of our
air fare specials:

*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Southwest specials are nonchangeable
 and nonrefundable.
*Ticketless Travel may be purchased online using
 either a credit card or by utilizing funds from a
 previously unused or cancelled Ticketless
 Travel reservation(s).  Funds from up to four cancelled
 or unused Ticketless Travel reservation records can
 be combined to purchase a new Ticketless Travel
 reservation record.  Southwest Airlines travel credit
 travel vouchers, gift certificates, and discount coupons)
 may not be used as forms of payment for
 Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
 Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.
*Seats are limited and won't be available on some
 flights that operate during very busy travel times
 and holiday periods such as Presidents Day and Memorial Day.
*Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
 full unrestricted fare.

=================================================================
DOLLAR RENT A CAR WEEKLY RATE AND EXTRA CREDIT OFFER
=================================================================
Weekly Rate and Extra Rapid Rewards Credit Offer from Dollar
Rent A Car

Dollar Rent A Car is offering a weekly rate (that's a 5 to 7 day
rental) of $144.00 on a compact car, PLUS receive DOUBLE Rapid
Rewards credit (1 credit vs. the standard .5 credit) per
qualifying rental transaction!  Valid at participating locations
for rentals booked from February 5 through 7, 2002 and picked up
by June 7, 2002.

For more details, please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/hotfares_cars.html?src=e020502

=================================================================
SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION
=================================================================
Please pass this great news on to your friends.
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail
Updates, visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save E-mail Updates.
For administration of your e-mail subscription, please visit:
http://www.southwest.com/email/emailUnsubscribe.html

=================================================================
You may retrieve and print a copy of your Southwest
Airlines Ticketless Travel at:
http://www.southwest.com/travel_center/retrieveItinerary.html

Questions about your flight arrival or departure time?
Please visit us at:
http://www.southwest.com/cgi-bin/selectFlight

=================================================================

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2002 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: dperlin@enron.com
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email/


A new class on HTML Basics will be offered on September 14 from 8:30-11:30 am.  This class is for beginners.  The topics to be included are:

Text Appearance and alignment
Paragraphs and Line Breaks
Hyperlinks within Web Site
Linking with Named Anchors
Linking to an Email Address
Placing Graphics on a Page
Graphics Images with Hyperlinks
Arranging Text in Lists
Formatting Lists with Symbols and Numbers

You can register for the class at elm.enron.com.  If you have difficulty registering, please call ext. 31816 for assistance.


thanks tana!

...i'm just about surviving......however dear old edmund suffering a bit -
he's out of action 'til October....it must be called "EOLitis"!

..we're off to florence for the weekend  for a wedding - which will be lovely
..will see "David" again...what a treat!

TooTOO

J

From: Tana Jones on 30/08/2000 15:32 CDT
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Online Letter Form

At Mark Taylor's request, I am attaching Leslie Hansen's form of override
letter when a GTC will "override" the master agreement for online
transactions.

How are you doing Justy?


Guys, please come up with a plan to meet Ben's requirements.

The key sites/jobs for 2001/2002 include:
- florida - several sites - 06/01;
- LV Cogen - early '02;
- Project Moore (Ontario) - 06/01;
- Pastoria - early '03';
- Monterrey - early '02;
-Coyote - early '02;
- LIPA barge deal - '01;
- possibly - Lousiana - 06/01.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/26/2000
08:54 AM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby
06/24/2000 12:06 AM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Construction Duration, Florida Peaker Project

Dave:

I really hate to bother you with this, but anything you can do to get these
guys off the dime and moving (rather than complaining) would be appreciated.
I called Westfahl as you suggested, but he never responded. At the end of the
day, I think maybe the board approval we were talking about (Moore, Florida
and Louisiana) is the only way to send the message.

One highlight of interest in Coleman's e-mail is that it takes longer than 7
months to construct a 6 - LM6000 plant. That's pretty amazing given that
NEPCO just finished constructing four ENA plants (Gleason, Wheatland, Wilton
and Doyle) in less than 6 months.

Anything you can do (or any advice) would be appreciated. Right now I'm
simply ignoring the negativism and proceeding as quickly as possible.

Regards,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 10:09 PM
---------------------------

Mike Coleman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/22/2000 04:01 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby@ECT, Thomas Suffield
cc: Bruce Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Construction Duration, Florida Peaker Project

Ben,

Reflecting on our conversation at lunch the other day, I want to re-emphasize
my concerns about the schedule issues.  You indicated that you had an idea
that the plant could be built in the field in 120 days, or approximately 4
months.  This is not at all realistic.  I would expect that the most
aggressive schedule for a greenfield installation of simple cycle gas fired
LM 6000's would run approximately 90 days for the first unit, plus about two
weeks for each additional unit.  This would result in an installation
duration of aproximately 5.5 months for a 6 unit gas fired plant.  In front
of that there would have to be site preparation and initial foundation work
done.

The Florida and Louisiana projects can be expected to have significant piling
requirements which will add probably a minimum of 30 days to the front of
this schedule, and the dual fuel consideration may lengthen the incremental
installation time per unit somewhat.  Considering these factors, it would not
be unreasonable to expect field duration to be 7 months or longer.

I know that this is much longer than what you have had in mind.  But I think
that this is real world.  For a 1 June start of operations, this would mean
getting site access by 1 November, which is only 4 months from now.

You stated that the permitting requirements may be as much as 6 months for
Florida.  If this is correct then there is a serious disconnect for your
schedule.  We need to make all efforts to expedite the on site date if June
01 commercial operations is to be achieved.

Let's talk.

Mike


Thanks for your nice note.  I have fun being here, which makes all of this
even better!  --Sally

From: Jeffrey McMahon/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/16/2001 11:44 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Promotion

Sally

Congrats on your promotion to MD.  If anyone around this place deserves it,
it's you!!  Hope all is well.


Gary,

Does the workhseet mentioned below assist you with the monthly operations
related to the industrial customers?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000
07:57 PM ---------------------------
To: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Industrials

 First of the month  industrials are coming along fine.  I will finalize my
pathing tomorrow, Thursday,  and set up buybacks and swings by the
    end of day Friday.

     The industrial "Buyback & Deficiency Deals" worksheet  has captured the
necessary data to help Gas Control & the on-call scheduler as well as
      myself and Client Services.
      I  will have a preliminary worksheet done by the end of day Friday.

      I am on vacation during the week of July 5th thru July 10th.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Pat Clynes @ ENRON                           06/28/2000 12:45 PM

To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Industrials

Robert,
How do we look on the industrial deadlines?  Please let me know.   Thanks,
Pat

Daren J Farmer@ECT
06/28/2000 11:19 AM
To: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Industrials

When will the buybacks and swings be set up for July?  I am a little
concerned with the long weekend coming up.  I believe that we agreed that
these would be set up by the 3rd work day, which would be Friday the 7th.
(Six days of flow.)  I definitely don't think that we should any later.  It
would be great if this could be handled sooner, miimizing our economic impact.

Additionally, we need to get the Industrial spreadsheet up and running
again.  This report is very beneficial to Gas Control, industrial traders and
schedulers on call.

Let me know what you think.

D


Enron announces a 40 percent increase in second quarter net income, but a drop in broadband revenue prompts EBS to restructure.

Also in this issue:
Good news from FERC
Enron sues California Senate committee
PGE re"spawns" to salmon incident
Enron direct lands in Calgary
What does an originator do?

It's all in the latest eBiz (http://home.enron.com/pubs/ebiz/issues/071301/).  Go to home.enron.com
(http://home.enron.com ) click Publications, then click eBiz, and "eBiz July 13, 2001."


You work the attachment, and I'll work paragraph 4 of the letter.   I want to
put more impact stuff in the letter.

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Mary Sullivan                           02/06/2001 12:38 PM
	Phone No: 713-853-7074  Phone
  888 397-1638  Pager
  EB766

To: Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Dave Roberts/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Dobler/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Weiss/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: CDWR Response

George and I are editing Exihibit 4 now.  Will send revision to you by 2pm
CST.

Thanks
Mary


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 5/21/01.   Please note that The Paralan Company and SGL Carbon, LLC were added to the Credit Watch List.  Also, Southstar Energy Services, LLC had been moved to "NO TRADES".
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923, Russell Diamond at x5-7095, or Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                      Tuesday, October 24, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165619
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: BUYandHOLD
 Hey Fool! Want to know the SECRET to long-term investing?
 Compounding and dollar-cost averaging! Start investing with
 as little as $20! Just $2.99 per order!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=165620

"He that maketh haste to be rich shall not be innocent."
-- Proverbs 28:20

ACTIVISION LANDS HIGH SCORE
Activision tops estimates. Game on!

By Rick Aristotle Munarriz

The game's afoot for software specialist Activision (Nasdaq:
ATVI). The popular video game maker trounced analyst estimates
like a Quake baddie in one of its console ports.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=165621

Earnings more than quadrupled to $0.17 a share, a stunning eight
cents above Wall Street projections. Revenues climbed by 25% to
$144.4 million with the peak holiday shopping season right
around the corner.

But, as we noted last week, delays in mass shipments of the
highly anticipated PlayStation 2 might hose down some of that
red-hot momentum with the video game powerhouses. Without enough
systems to meet seasonal demand, and few gamers willing to
stockpile games for platforms on the way out, how will
Activision perform?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165622

The company is now hiking its annual bottom-line forecast by
seven cents to $0.63 a share. The only problem is that the
company used up eight of those upwardly revised coppers this
past quarter. That means that the game maker is looking to fall
a penny short in either the December or March reporting period.

That might happen later rather than sooner. Since mid-September
the company's Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2 has been the top-selling
title for the top-selling PlayStation system. While we are now
just two days away from the PlayStation
2 launch, the extreme skating title should continue to roll
along nicely in the near term.

Activision -- the subject of StockTalk last April -- is the
country's second-largest developer of game console software,
behind only Electronic Arts (Nasdaq: ERTS). The company is
looking for flat growth over the year ahead but a 50% spike come
calendar year 2002.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165623

So the past looks great. The long-term appears equally aglow.
It's the near-term that might have investors fumbling for the
pause button.
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

Winning the battle but Lucent (NYSE: LU) the war, the
telecommunications titan reported earnings of $0.18 a share, a
penny above estimates. The problem? Analysts were looking for a
$0.29 showing before the company gave Wall Street downward
guidance due to soft equipment sales. That prompted the bar
being lowered to a height of $0.17 a share. Over the weekend,
the company's board of directors fired its CEO. Reserve the
right to do the same to anyone who naively tells you that Lucent
is back on track because it topped fourth-quarter projections.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165624
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165625

Twenty-five million Welcomes. This morning America Online (NYSE:
AOL) announced that it reached the 25 million subscriber mark
for its namesake online service. It was simply a matter of time
-- and of scatter software marketing -- since the company had
announced that it had 24.6 million users at the end of the
September quarter. On the merger front, today's Wall Street
Journal is reporting that the review deadline for its Time
Warner (NYSE: TWX) acquisition has been extended by two weeks.
The stateside antitrust authorities continue to ponder the
ramifications of the mega media merger.

National Semiconductor (NYSE: NSM) is laying its chips on the
table and the stock is falling as it may. The company has warned
that its second and third quarters might fall short of its
fiscal first-quarter showing. The company earned $0.76 a share
on $640 million in revenues for the period.

It was another "pfine" quarter for Pfizer (NYSE: PFE). The
pharmaceuticals powerhouse reported earnings of $0.27 a share on
revenues of $7.2 billion. The results came in two cents ahead of
expectations. For the year, the company is comfortable with
targets of $30 billion in revenue and $1.01 a share in earnings.

Check out yesterday's Foolish market wrap-up with just one click.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165626
_________________________________________________________________

EDITOR'S PICK

In the midst of the "Subway Series," the Fool's Phil Weiss
evaluates Lucent's performance this past year in baseball terms.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165627
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165628

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165629

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165630

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165631

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165632
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165633
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165634
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165635
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165636
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165637

 Sponsored By: BUYandHOLD
 Hey Fool! Want to know the SECRET to long-term investing?
 Compounding and dollar-cost averaging! Start investing with
 as little as $20! Just $2.99 per order!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=165638

WANT TO RETIRE EARLY?
 We'll help you set your retirement
 date (literally!) in our Roadmap to
 Retirement Online Seminar.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165639

TRY THE ALL-CASH DIET
 Get your spending under control with
 this report from Soapbox.com.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=165640

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=165641
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId: msg-16151-B10242676Address.msg-09:02:00(10-24-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


As we discussed, here is the draft agreement I brought up this morning.
Hopefully, you have time to review and initial so that Stephanie Miller can
execute this afternoon and overnight mail it tonight.

Thanks and sorry for the short notice,

Ruth


Jeff, as per our discussion, this would be a great opportunity for you to
spend some time with and instill your vision for Enron to the leaders of the
ENA organization.  I have attached a preliminary agenda which has you
speaking to the group right after dinner the night of December 14th.  You
have no time constraint on the length of your talk (ie) whatever you find
find appropriate in order to get your message across.  I though it might be
interesting for you to give your vision of Enron's 2001 goals, objectives and
strategy.  As well, a brief business overview of EES, EBS and Networks may be
valuable in building connections.

Regards
Delainey


I will be in the office through Thursday.

Larry Pardue@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/05/2000 12:03 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl@ECT, Doug Leach@ECT
cc: Francisco Pinto Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: EPOS Consents -- Your Availability to Execute

Dan/Doug:

Please advise as soon as possible if both of you will be in the office later
in the week this week, and the first part of next week, to review the
Consents (for Dan), and execution on behalf of EPOS (for Doug).

Thanks.

Larry Pardue
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Caribbean -- Legal Department
333 Clay Street, Suite 1900
Houston, Texas
U.S.A.
Tel   +713 345 52 40
Fax   +713 646 60 58
email:  larry.pardue@enron.com


I can't wait to see you tonight.  If you have alot of things to do at home, I don't mind driving to your house after Jackie's conference.   I have an Azurix 2002 Plan review from 2:30-4:30, so I will not be at your staff meeting.  I should be around until then.

Love you,

Red


Hi Charlotte,

What's your preference today?  I can either meet you at our house, or pick up
Michael at your place.

Kay


Everyone,  - PLEASE DO NOT ERASE THE EMAIL --PLEASE RESPOND!!!!

Project Gem is approaching and Enron is going global with Windows 2000
Migration.  They are trying to assist RAC in implementing the Migration in a
successful fashion.  To do this, they have requested an inventory of each
computer within RAC.   The Network managers have created a simplier and
easier way to do this.   Each Group within RAC will have a Contact Person to
work closely with them.  His name is Lee Steele.

Lee Steele, Manager of Enron Networks will be sending each of us an email
regarding the Windows 2000 Migration.  He would like an inventory of each
employees' computer applications.  On the said email that each of you receive
from Lee, PLEASE open the link from your own computer.   According to Lee,
this is very important because once you open the email, by clicking on the
link, it will automatically list each application you have.   ....so again,
please pay close attention to the Email from Lee Steele.

Lee,

Look forward to receiving your email.

Thank you in advance.

Dorothy

--------------------- Forwarded by Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000
08:40 AM ---------------------------

	From:  William S Bradford                           12/05/2000 08:32 PM

To: Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Windows 2000 Migration (Electronic Email Notice)

Please get me on the distribution.

Bill

---------------------- Forwarded by William S Bradford/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000
07:34 PM ---------------------------

From:  Karen K Heathman
      12/05/2000 02:59 PM

To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Windows 2000 Migration (Electronic Email Notice)

FYI - Noticed that you were not copied on this memo.

---------------------- Forwarded by Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000
02:58 PM ---------------------------
LEE STEELE @
ENRON
12/05/2000 02:03 PM

To: Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela
Brown/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
L Copeland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew
Greer/NA/Enron@Enron, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen K
Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendi
LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Martin O'Leary/HOU/EES@EES, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Teresa Seibel/NA/Enron@ENRON, Darren
Vanek/NA/Enron@Enron, Jane Wilhite/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason R
Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Windows 2000 Migration (Electronic Email Notice)

Dorothy,

 I have received the Org Chart and the User List for your business unit.
Please review and verify the user list below.  The attached document
describes the workstation inventory phase of the GEM process

I need you to do a couple of things before I send this email out to the users.
Please verify the user list below.
Please let me know a date that I can send this email.
Please let the user community know that this email is coming and what it
means.

Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT, Angela Brown/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT, James L Copeland/HOU/ECT, Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT, Veronica
Espinoza/Corp/Enron, Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT, Andrew Greer/NA/Enron, Walter
Guidroz/NA/Enron, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT, Wendi
LeBrocq/Corp/Enron, Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT, Martin O'Leary/HOU/EES, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron, Brant
Reves/HOU/ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron, Teresa
Seibel/NA/Enron, Darren Vanek/NA/Enron, Jane Wilhite/NA/Enron, Jason R
Williams/NA/Enron, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT,

Please call me if you have any questions or concerns.

Best Regards,
 Lee Steele
 Manager Enron Networks
 (713)345-8259


I am in the London office this week, so I won't be able to attend.

01/16/2001 04:40 PM
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
01/16/2001 04:40 PM
01/16/2001 04:40 PM
To: Thomas D Gros/NA/Enron@Enron, Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT, Susan
Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hal Elrod/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Slagle/HOU/ECT@ect, Brad
Romine/NA/Enron@Enron, Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Whitehead/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Douglas Fuehne/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kristin
Cantu/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patrick Scales/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Huff/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Coyle/NA/Enron@ENRON, Amy Schneider/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Jenny Lim/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nicolas Lam/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christopher
Cocks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Ledgerwood/NA/Enron@ENRON, Murali
Perumbedu/NA/Enron@ENRON, Blair Sandberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Corbett
Barr/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stephen Niezgoda/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mohan
Pattabiraman/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tad Lynch/NA/Enron@ENRON, Battista
Psenda/ENRON@enronXgate, Madho Sudhan/ENRON@enronXgate, Cesar
Motta/ENRON@enronXgate, Junaid Khanani/ENRON@enronXgate, Amit
Lai/ENRON@enronXgate, Will Zamer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea
Crump/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd.Ballengee@luminant.com,
Andrew.matthews@luminant.com, michael.lee@luminant.com,
andrew.cole@luminant.com, huffj@diamtech.com, coylej@diamtech.com
cc: Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mckenzie Senigal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia
Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CommodityLogic Off-site

Happy Hour

Please join us for a CommodityLogic Off-site January 17th at Kenneally's
begining at 6:00pm.
We will be welcoming all the new additions to the team and saying farewell to
those who have moved off to other projects.  Please plan on attending.  If
you have any questions, please contact Maria x35586 or Brenda x31914.

See you there!


See Barton Creek's comments below.

-----Original Message-----
From: Amy.Lawder@ourclub.com [mailto:Amy.Lawder@ourclub.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:13 PM
To: Hitchcock, Dorie
Subject: John Lavorato's Suite Charge

Hello Dorie,

I know this is not the most opportune time, but we have a final decision on
the suite pricing.  This special rate was more than 50% off of the original
pricing for just one bedroom.  It was something negotiated between
ourselves and we can't justify a lower rate on a sold out night for Mr.
Lavorato when he continued to stay in the suite.  This might be different
had he moved to a regular room and we could have upsold someone else to the
suite.   However, we had to walk away from that revenue.    I hope Mr.
Lavorato understands our business position.  Please contact me if you have
any questions.

Amy Lawder


Greetings, Tom!  Have you recovered from the whirlwind of the inauguration?
Wasn't that fun!

I'm writing in the hopes you can provide a little background for a cover
story that Worth Magazine is doing on Jeff - he's traveling and it's
difficult to reach him, hence my note to you.

The report is interested in the station call letters and channel number in
Aurora, IL, where Jeff worked in high school.  Additionally, he would like to
confirm that Jeff started out as a camera man and graduated to producer.  Is
this the correct history?  Any historical information you can provide is most
appreciated.

I hope all is well.  Look foward to hearing from you soon.

Regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax0


Keep an eye on the bridge - these are still erroring out.


Use this file:  I have dated the forward price curve chart so that it is
clear it is prices as of today.

GAC

Alan Comnes
12/22/2000 01:39 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Charts

Steve, Ginger:

The first file has the charts and data you requested.

I am also forwading some charts on price caps.  You may be interested in the
charts on California Stage 1/2/3 emergencies.

Alan Comnes


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001 07:10 PM -----

	Tom Ross <tross@mcnallytemple.com>
	06/22/2001 05:02 PM

		 To: Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'"
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>,
"'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante
(E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, dpeters@mccabeandcompany.net, "'Marty Wilson
(E-mail)'" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "Tom Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex
Sugaoka (E-mail)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
trusso@mcnallytemple.com, sadlersa@earthlink.net, mstultz@epsa.org,
rtemple@mcnallytemple.com, tracy.fairchild@edelman.com,
megan.beiser@edelman.com, deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com, lchurch@epsa.org, Katie
Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, tcwillia@duke-energy.com, rwhyde@duke-energy.com,
tmcmorrow@manatt.com, Suzy.L.Rodriguez@dynegy.com, ppitts@wiredworld1.com,
mnobili@cal-lobby.com, sscsus@aol.com, kvellandi@pstrategies.com,
kelly@hnks.com, kirk@cea.com, jbkinney@duke-energy.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Smutny Letter to Senator Dunn

June 22, 2001

The Honorable Joseph Dunn
Chair, Senate Select Committee
California State Senate
Room 2080
California State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Senator Dunn:

Earlier this year, you met individually with IEP and various other parties to
explain the purpose of the Senate Select Committee?s hearing and the process
under which they were to be conducted.  You made it very clear that you were
planning to have fact-finding hearings based upon fundamental fairness and
due process.  You made a further commitment that there would be no
surprises.  Prior to today, the hearings have been conducted consistent with
that representation.

Unfortunately, today it appears that the Committee has set a new course that
radically departs from these previous commitments.  Today, the Committee is
hearing testimony from several surprise witnesses.  These witnesses are
former employees of San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) under contract with
Duke Energy for an interim period during which Duke Energy operated the
facilities in San Diego.   It is our understanding that these former contract
employees are alleging that the company failed to properly maintain these
facilities, and they are alleging that Duke Energy cycled these facilities
differently than the former owner, SDG&E.  It is also our understanding that
Duke Energy will not be afforded the opportunity to contemporaneously
challenge these allegations and/or provide an explanation as to the
operational behavior of the facilities.  In short, the hearings are being
reduced to a media event, giving credence to the unsustainable allegations of
disgruntled ex-employees.

Respectfully, it would appear that the Committee has wandered far afield of
its stated goals.  These hearings have the potential of identifying what went
wrong with California?s energy policy and how to fix it.  However, this will
only occur if this inquiry is based on informal facts and complete
information, not innuendo and unsubstantiated allegations.  It is the pursuit
of facts, not headlines, which will solve California?s energy crisis.  These
facts will be revealed only in a fair process, where allegations made are
subject to contemporaneous response.

It is our hope that today?s process is an aberration, and not a departure
from your commitments.  The Committee is at a crossroads.  It can choose to
engage in fact-finding and analysis, or it can be reduced to a witch-hunt in
pursuit of headlines.  For the benefit of all Californian?s, the Committee
should focus on fact-finding and analysis.

Sincerely,

Jan Smutny-Jones
Executive Director


Please schedule a meeting with Caroline about her needs

---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001
04:58 PM ---------------------------

Chris Gaskill@ENRON
12/27/2000 04:31 PM
To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: New York Office Requests

Hunter,

I wanted your opinion on how to respond to the following e-mail.  It sounds
like Caroline Abramo is sharing some of Mike's research and the Fundamentals
research with some of the hedge funds.  Do we want to keep sending her the
information or limit it to certain pieces of research.  Do we make any/enough
money off of their business to provide them with our internal research?  I
have told her in the past that the quarterly production numbers that we
provide are for internal use only, but it sounds like some of the information
is going outside of Enron.  Let me know what you think.

Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron on 12/27/2000
04:29 PM ---------------------------

Caroline Abramo
12/26/2000 04:21 PM
To: Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT, Vikas
Dwivedi/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: industrials

Chris - this is feedback on Elena's sheets - the ones she puts together as
part of Mike Robert's Monday package.  I think they have real potential to be
very valuable but we could use a bit more digging on them- the feedback is
from Dwight Anderson at Tudor who has been in the commodity markets for years
and who has a very fundamental approach to his positions- one of his major
tenants is that industrials (chemicals) can not produce at above $7 gas - he
has done in-depth analysis of this and probably has a number in mind for how
much comes onto the market at these levels- I will try to ascertain. He also
wholeheartedly believes that more production will come in 02 and will see
prices go below current levels- I know Sachin is working on the production
numbers- it would like to see us project these out a bit further and have the
historical production data as well - in order to see how extreme the changes
in production have been.

The info that the funds share with us is very privileged - we generally do
not share it with many people- I'd like to include you on discussions so that
we can help them with their views as well as ours to bang out better trading
strategies

Unfortunately, I have not been able to get into the fundamental site in NY
but I am working on it.  I am sure a lot of this info is up there.

Rgds,
CA
212 702 3910

---------------------- Forwarded by Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron on 12/26/2000
04:33 PM ---------------------------

Dwight Anderson <Dwight.Anderson@tudor.com> on 12/22/2000 06:32:54 PM
To: "'Caroline.Abramo@enron.com'" <Caroline.Abramo@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: industrials

what do the ally cutbacks mean in mcf per day
what is the impact of the integrated steel plants running at 70% of capacity
(number released weekly) mean to power demand and hence demand for nat gas
what is going on re. nat gas liquids being stripped out? i.e. dynegy and
mitchell etc. have all announced full or partial closures of stripping
facilities as economics aren't there.  someone shld be tracking what this
means in mcf per day
why won't utilities give you utilization of plants by fuel type, as they do
in nuclear, so you can track power demand by fuel type
how much nat gas demand is being lost cuz nat gas ethylene producers have
shut down as margins are too low vs. their naptha based competitors.  etc.
etc.
where do we stand on switching vs. resid, diesel etc. etc.

i could go on, but i think i've made my point; what is in the report is
good, but it's incomplete and not totaled with some summary conclusions.
it's only the very easy, first derivative demands/closures.  it could add
real value by looking for alternative data points that aren't as easily
tracked by the market.

-----Original Message-----
From: Caroline.Abramo@enron.com [mailto:Caroline.Abramo@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 11:04 AM
To: Dwight.Anderson@tudor.com
Subject: industrials

D- not sure if we ever showed this to you- once a week we update all the
plant closures for ammonia, methanol, and aluminium smelters and the
resulting gas and power that's back on the market.  these pages are in back
of the weather.  please let me know what you think of these- elena, our
analyst in houston is always looking for feedback which is hard to get
because the report only circulates internally.

(See attached file: EnronWx121800.pdf)


In referring to your  e mail to Ken Lay,  the reason  we   see total  US  gas
storage volumes BY month in 2000  decrease  by    .200 TCF  to  .400 TCF
below   the levels by month  in 1999 is due to  the following  reasons:

A.  STORAGE  COSTS   Putting  gas into storage for  a  several month period
typically costs  50 cents  to  $1.00 per  MCF or more;

B.  GAS COSTS   This cost  becomes  too  high to  put  gas into storage
when average  U.S.  prices  start rising because  the  need  to USE  the gas
itself,  not store  it,   becomes  greater than the need  to put it into
storage and pay storage  costs   for  future  needs.

For  example    at  $2.00 plus  50 cents  or   $1.00 for heat season storage
this cost combination is typically economic;   but  the situation becomes
cost prohibitive  when demand in the market for gas  is  so great to USE it
that it moves  the price  to   $3.00  or more  or as high as   $4.60  --  to
which  one would  then also have to  add   50 cents or  another dollar to
store it.

  TOTAL  GAS IN STORAGE  Source:  Table 10  US DOE EIA November 2000;  Gas
Prices  per  Table   4

APRIL 1999 5.876 TCF             $1.86 MCF US  Avg Gas  Wellhead Price
MAY  6.206     2.16
JUNE  6.519     2.12
JULY  6.749     2.18
AUG  6.978     2.49
SEP  7.292     2.61
0CT  7.443     2.50
NOV  7.445     2.67
DEC  6.906       2.20

JAN 2000 6.088   $ 2.12
FEB  5.672     2.30
MAR  5.514     2.36
APR  5.547     2.55
MAY  5.782     2.90
JUNE  6.061     3.73
JULY  6.351     3.70
AUG  6.544     3.67
SEP  6.827     4.26
OCT  7.072     4.61
NOV  6.779

Per  Table   3,   U.S.  gas  consumption  rose  .500 TCF  in year 2000
versus   1999;  but  additional supply from US and Canada  Table   2,     was
just  .100 TCF  so   to meet  the market  demand    .400 TCF  of  gas had to
come  out of  storage.
Hope  this helps clarify.  You can see these  reports on the  DOE   web
site   at   www.eia.doe.gov  and click on Natural Gas Monthly Statistics.
Regards,  M  Carson  Enron Competitive  Analysis


Kathy,

I have completed the draft of the Canadain agreement for your review.   I am
waiting on my credit dept. re credit terms.  I hope to send the draft
today.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


<TITLE>Pizza Hut</TITLE>

<spacer type="block" width="12">
		<spacer type="block" width="15">

		Dear Phillip,

		What better way to celebrate than with fantastic deals from Pizza Hut®.
		So order your favorite Pizza Hut® pizza for a big party or game, and
		have a Happy New Year!

		Sign up with Pizza Hut® to get the latest and greatest offers and
		updates on new, exciting pizzas sent directly to you.

		For more information on Pizza Hut®, please click here.

		<spacer type="block" width="15">
		<spacer type="block" width="10">

<map name="buttons">
<area coords="3,4,102,36" href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/205/excl1231ph1.cgi" shape="RECT">
<area coords="2,41,113,88" href="http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/205/excl1231ph2.cgi">
</map>

<spacer type="block" width="12">

		<spacer type="block" width="10">

<spacer type="block" width="12">

  BA
 N9Q
      BB
N9Q

      BC
 N9Q

		<spacer type="block" width="10">

Please click here if you have
trouble printing these coupons.

You received this e-mail because you registered on CBS SportsLine.com. If you do not want to receive these special e-mail
offers you can unsubscribe by clicking this link: http://www.sportsline.com/u/newsletters/newsletter.cgi?email=pallen@enron.com.
You are subscribed as [{(pallen@enron.com)}] .

Although we are sending this e-mail to you, SportsLine.com is not responsible for the advertisers' content and makes no
warranties or guarantees about the products or services advertised. SportsLine.com takes your privacy seriously. To learn more
about SportsLine.com's use of personal information, please read our Privacy Statement at http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/userservices/privacy.htm


Guys, I received Harrell's memo concerning the fuel use for the turbine and
the fact that you had to reduce gas producer speeds to comply with the
permits fuel use requirements.  My question is, how does the fuel use compare
with what Solar says the fuel use should be?  If we can get Solar to provide
written guarantees and "UP" the fuel use value for the turbine, we can up the
fuel value on the permit.  The state of Colorado perceives increased fuel use
beyond manufacturers values as the turbine not operating correctly and in
need of mechanical adjustment.  From their eyes, this would be a strong
indication of excess emissions, and I think there evaluation would hold some
merit.  Anyway, I dont want to send up a red flag to the state of Colorado.

Would you contact Solar and compare their fuel use values with what the
monitors say the turbine is burning at La Plata?

Then let me know.  If worse gets to worse, I may be able to use another
tactic, but only as a last resort.


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

 - screbro.jpg
 - screbroburn.jpg
 - scretatburn.jpg
 - postboylip.jpg
 - postgirllip.jpg
 - tatfatig.jpg
 - tatgroup.jpg


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/EES on 07/12/2001 06:36 AM ---------------------------

Dan Leff
07/11/2001 11:09 PM
To:	Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	More UC/CSU Info

FYI - Dan

********************************************************************************************************************************
AS uc enron agreement

Jul. 11, 2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

University of California, California State University and Enron Reach Settlement Agreement

ATTENTION: State, Business editors

OAKLAND, Calif., July 11 (AScribe News) -- The University of California, California State University and Enron Energy Services announced today a settlement agreement that will extend their contract for two years and return the two university systems to direct access service from Enron.

As part of the agreement, UC and the CSU will drop their lawsuit against Enron and Enron will dismiss its appeal. The two university systems had brought suit in federal court seeking to retain their status as direct access Enron customers after Enron had resourced their power procurement to the Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas&Electric utility companies.

"We are delighted that our negotiations with Enron have ended with retention of the two university systems as direct access Enron customers," said Joseph P. Mullinix, UC senior vice president for business and finance.

"The California State University is pleased that we have been able to resolve our differences with Enron and retain our direct access status," said Richard P. West, CSU executive vice chancellor and chief financial officer. "This agreement means considerable savings for the universities and allows us to continue with our energy conservation efforts."

"Enron has always been a strong advocate of the benefits of direct access, and we are pleased to be able to extend our contract for two years with UC/CSU," said Marty Sunde, vice chairman, Enron Energy Services.

"Separately, with the potential elimination of direct access for California customers, Enron is once again directly serving its commercial customers in California, including UC and CSU. As more and more customers in California see the importance of managing their price risk in power markets, commercial energy users have increased interest in our product offerings."

The current four-year contract with Enron is scheduled to end on March 31, 2002. The two-year extension, approved in principle, would continue the two university systems as direct access Enron customers until March 31, 2004.

Enron and the universities will negotiate price and other terms of the extension between now and Dec. 1, 2001. Both parties have the right to terminate the extension if an agreement is not reached by Dec. 1.

The agreement covers all UC campuses and the UC Office of the President, with the exception of UCLA and UC Riverside, which have agreements with their local municipalities. All CSU campuses, except Los Angeles, Northridge, Sacramento and Stanislaus, are part of the Enron contract, as is the CSU Office of the Chancellor.

Together, UC and CSU rank as the largest single user of electricity in California. UC's systemwide peak load is 332 megawatts, and CSU's is 117 megawatts. One megawatt powers approximately 1,000 homes.

-30-

Media Contact: Charles McFadden, University of California, 510-987-9193; charles.mcfadden(at)ucop.edu

Colleen Bentley-Adler, California State University, 562-951-4801; cbentley-adler(at)calstate.edu

Peggy Mahoney, Enron Energy Services, 713-345-7034; pmahoney(at)enron.com

AScribe - The Public Interest Newswire / 510-653-9400 $$

APRS0119234206

  Copyright ? 2001 Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. All Rights Reserved.


It seems that KSU is getting it together in basketball!  Way to go, team!

Don't forget the Bowl Watch Party on Saturday, December 29, at 4 p.m. when
KSU meets Syracuse University at the Insight.com bowl!  Plan to be there!

Let's not forget the reason for our celebration this 25th of December.  We
are all truly thankful for our faith in God, for our families and friends,
and for this wonderful country in which we live.  We pray that the year 2002
will not be so difficult for so many of our fellow Americans.  Follow the
star to a blessed Christmas holiday.

But don't forget December 29!

Go Cats!

Joyce and Ken Nesmith
Co-chairmen
Houston Alumni Club
-----Original Message-----
From: Mitzi Frieling <MFrieling@K-State.com>
To: MFrieling@K-State.com <MFrieling@K-State.com>
Date: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:09 AM
Subject: MBK vs. North Texas

>
>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>Date: December 15, 2001
>Contact: Doug Dull, Sports Information Director
>
>PASCO HAS 30 POINTS TO LEAD K-STATE TO VICTORY
>
>        MANHATTAN, Kan. - Junior center Pervis Pasco had 30 points
>and 11 points to lead Kansas State to an 84-70 victory over North
>Texas in a men's college basketball game played Saturday at Bramlage
>Coliseum.
>        The win snapped a two-game losing streak by the Wildcats and
>lifted them to 5-3 overall. The Mean Green fell to 1-6 on the year
>after losing their sixth straight.
>        Pasco, who also had five blocked shots, hit 11 of 17 shots
>from the floor to lead the Wildcats. Nick Williams chipped in with 19
>points, while Larry Reid finished with 13 points, eight assists and
>seven rebounds.
>        Junior guard Chris Davis led North Texas with 28 points and
>nine rebounds, hitting 11 of 21 shots from the floor. He also had
>three three-pointers for the Mean Green, which got 10 points off the
>bench from Unjel Masters.
>        Kansas State went on an 11-1 run midway through the first
>half to take a 22-18 lead with 7:20 left. The lead grew through the
>rest of the half, and the Wildcats went to halftime with a 44-33
>halftime edge behind 15 points from Pasco.
>        K-State's advantage grew to 20 at 56-36 in the opening five
>minutes of the second half before the Mean Green started a slow
>comeback. North Texas cut the deficit under double figures to trail
>73-64 with 4:03 to play. But K-State hit 7 of its final 8 free throws
>in the final 3:50 to seal the win.
>        Pasco's previous season-high was 16 points, scored against
>Gardner-Webb. The double-double was his second of the season and his
>second straight, as he had 15 points and 10 boards at Northwestern
>last Saturday.
>        Williams also had a season-high for K-State, eclipsing the 15
>points he had scored at Northwestern.
>        K-State committed only eight turnovers in the game and
>finished with a 47 percent shooting mark from the field. North Texas
>was held to just 40 percent shooting from the floor.
>        Kansas State hosts Western Carolina on Wednesday evening at 7 p.m.
>
>--ksu--
>--
>*****************************************************
>
>


Vance,

Deal # 581202 has been created and entered in Sitara.

Bob

Vance L Taylor
01/22/2001 09:53 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amelia Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FIRST DELIVERY - PURE RESOURCES, L.P.

Bob,

The following production is now on-line and a ticket should be created and
entered into sitara based on the following:

Counterparty   Meter   Volumes  Price    Period
Pure Resources, L.P.  9867   500mmbtu/d  100% Gas Daily less $0.16 1/19 -
1/31

FYI, Susan will create and submit a committed reserves firm ticket for the
remaining term of the deal beginning with the month of February.
Additionally, this is a Producer Svcs. deal and should be tracked in the IM
Wellhead portfolio... attached to the gathering contract.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353
---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2001
04:19 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Esther Buckley                           01/22/2001 03:01 PM

To: Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lisa Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne E
Lightfoot/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Wardle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Jo Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cheryl Jones/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Reid Hansen/GCO/Enron@Enron, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gary Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff A Austin/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dawn C
Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Csikos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, J R
Fosdick/GCO/Enron@Enron, Carlos J Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, JoAnne
Harris/NA/Enron@Enron, Christy Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Earl Tisdale/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FIRST DELIVERY - PURE RESOURCES, L.P.

See attached letter


Heads up.  A reporter from the California Energy Markets publication called
Peter Bray at New Power about PG&E's Petition to Modify.

Roger
---------------------- Forwarded by Roger Yang/SFO/EES on 11/15/2000 12:50 PM
---------------------------

Roger Yang
11/15/2000 10:08 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: PG&E Petition to Modify

---------------------- Forwarded by Roger Yang/SFO/EES on 11/15/2000 09:59 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Marianne Castano                           11/15/2000 09:14 AM

To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda
Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES,
Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Melinda Winn/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: PG&E Petition to Modify

Please be advised that EES Legal is working with regulatory and litigation
counsel in California on a strategy to pursue in response to PG&E's
Petition.  Please do not contact PG&E or communicate any information
externally regarding this matter without first involving either Mike Smith or
me.

Thank you.

     Marianne

---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 11/15/2000
11:10 AM ---------------------------

Roger Yang
11/15/2000 10:45 AM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne
Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: PG&E Petition to Modify

In addressing PG&E's Petition to Modify, we may want to entertain the
following thoughts:

PG&E and SCE filed their cost recovery plans that implement the "top-down"
approach to calculating Direct Access charges implemented pursuant to
Decision No. 96-12-077;
PG&E and SCE entered into stipulations to remove the "direct access zero
minimum bill"; hence eliminating the cap on PX credits pursuant to Decision
No. 99-06-058;
Elimination of the PX cap is consistent with AB 1890 adoption of PU Code
368(b) which states, "The separation of the rate components required by this
subdivision shall be used to ensure that customers of the electrical
corporation who become eligible to purchase elctricity from supliers other
than the electrical corporation pay the same unbundled component charges,
other than energy, a bundled service customer pays.";
PG&E's Petition to Modify is burdensome and unnecessary because California
contract law governs the contractual relationship between ESPs and their
customers and there has been no evidentiary proof of customer complaints or
demonstration of unpaid costs from ESPs to utilities;
PG&E's Petition to Modify is a veiled attempt to access commercially
sensitive information which may be abused by the utilities;
PG&E's highlighting of this issue, may subject their shareholders at risk for
the decisions made by the utility to enter into the stipulation adopted in
Decision No. 99-06-058;
PG&E's questioning of the legality of the stipulation brings into question
the legality of all past settlements and stipulations, hence undermining
their position with respect to nuclear settlements; and
PG&E has demonstrated a track record of misleading the public through their
irresponsible claims in their GRC filings and customer meetings that there
will be post-freeze rate decreases above 30%, and in their "Rate Freeze End
Matrices" that the rate freeze can not end before January 1, 2001 and that as
prices increase the rate freeze will end at a later date.  This has
demonstrated that PG&E has covertly attempted to undermine Direct Access.

We should meet with PG&E, to strongly request that they withdraw their
Petition to Modification and remind them of these points.

Roger

---------------------- Forwarded by Roger Yang/SFO/EES on 11/15/2000 08:10 AM
---------------------------

Roger Yang
11/13/2000 06:45 PM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne
Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: PG&E Petition to Modify

PG&E filed a Petition for Modification of the CPUC decision (D.97-10-087)
adopting a settlement to eliminate the cap on PX credits and allow for PX
credits that results in payments to Direct Access customers and their ESPs.
PG&E is requesting that the CPUC add "clarifying language" to their previous
decision that states the following:

"PG&E will pay the ESP for accumulated negative charges or credits owing to
the customer if the ESP provides PG&E documentation showing that either (1)
the ESP is flowing through to the customer the negative charges or credits
owing to the customer or (2) the customer has assigned to the ESP the right
to receive the negative charges or credits owing to the customer."

In its Petition for Modification, PG&E has the nerve to state, "While it is
not clear whether this result was intended or is even lawful, to the extent
that PG&E owes these credits, as discussed below the credits belong to direct
access customers and not to their ESPs.  PG&E cites as the reason for this
filing is that they are interested in protecting against the risk that ESPs
are acting fraudulent with their customers.  However, the real reason PG&E is
raising this issue is to highlight the issue within the context of current
discussions regarding their request to end their rate freeze.  PG&E even
recognizes that this issue should be resolved with market participants in
working groups, but wanted to bring the issue to the attention of the CPUC.

Roger

---------------------- Forwarded by Roger Yang/SFO/EES on 11/13/2000 06:24 PM
---------------------------

Mona L Petrochko@ENRON
11/13/2000 12:57 PM
To: Roger Yang, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: PG&E Petition to Modify

PG&E filed a Pet Mod on the decision which directed them to pass on a PX
credit to ESPs even if it is in excess of the frozen rate.  PG&E is asking
that the credit in excess of frozen rates be conditioned upon a showing by
the ESPs that the customer is receiving the credit.

Legal is aware and is likely to be arranging a conference call on this
shortly.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Dupont, Anita
Sent:	Wednesday, June 27, 2001 8:08 PM
To:	Bill Rust (E-mail); Christi Nicolay (E-mail); Fred Mitro (E-mail); George Hopley (E-mail); Jean Ryall (E-mail); Jeffrey Wilson (E-mail); John Moore (E-mail); Lloyd Will (E-mail); Madhup Kumar (E-mail); Martin Lin (E-mail); Patrick Hanse (E-mail); R McNamara (E-mail); Robert Kraszewski (E-mail); Ron Tapscott (E-mail); Sevil Yaman (E-mail); Steve Olinde (E-mail); Steve Walton (E-mail); Susan Scott (E-mail); Tom Dutta (E-mail); Vasant Shanbhogue (E-mail); Vince J Kaminski (E-mail); Walter Coffer (E-mail)
Cc:	Cunningham, Lance
Subject:	FW: Transmission Round Table

Regards,

Anita DuPont
Enron Research Group
713-853-0329
EB 1969

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gordon, D'Ann
Sent:	Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Dupont, Anita
Cc:	Coffer, Walter
Subject:	Transmission Round Table

Anita,

Please send this note to all identified participants in the Transmission Round Table-

To all Transmission Round Table participants:

Please think about this proposed project and keep involved with suggestions and information as you receive such.  Be prepared to discuss proposal at the next "Round Table" and offer remarks via e-mail to any appropriate Enron person, but particulars to Walter Coffer.

"Current Transmission Project"

Initial concept of Mandate and Plan of Action

1) Pinpoint restrictions in the Transmission system and then develop a strategy for profiting by mitigation or other actions.

This is an effort that should be spread company wide with everyone who works with Transmission or learns a detail that relates to Transmission.

2) Use our "Transmission Round Table" to gather the knowledge and ideas that we need to formulate our strategy.

Share this knowledge through a website to be set up.

Activate all who work with Transmission or have any good ideas on the subject.

3) Develop a team to do the required work under a mandate from Dave Duran; directed by Walter Coffer.

4) Develop strategies for working with each type of competing regional Transmission entities. (ISO, Transco, RTO)

5) List pertinent Enron web pages, what should be on them, and who to talk to about the information contained in each.

6) Go to work now!


This should help clarify a lot of things, thanks Tana for the Certificate of
assumed name.

The receipt of the assumed name certificate from the State of Illinois proves
that Northern Ilinois Gas Company is an active Corporation (set up in GCP as
a HQ company) with Nicor Gas Company as their assumed name (Set up in GCP as
a tradename). Seems like in Global Counterparty both the counterparties are
set up exactly the way it should be. The request below is to change the
tradename's name from Nicor Gas Company to Northen Ilinois Gas Company dba
Nicor Gas Company, which I don't have any documentation or instructions for.
Upon my conversation with Sandy Allison, Attorney Nicor Gas at Ph (630)
983-8676 x2882 all the contracts and legal binding documents should carry the
name Nicor Gas Company, and so does the Assumed Name Certificate says. In
addition, Marcia Nawrocki, Attorney Nicor Gas on her fax cover sheet attached
with the Certificate, instructed to "use NICOR GAS COMANY".

In lieu of the above facts, Global Counterparty does not feel necessary to
make any changes in its database.
Regards!

Adnan Patel
x58335

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 08/23/2000 08:49 AM
To: Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Northern Illinois Gas Company/Nicor Gas Company

Susan Bailey, the paralegal working on this master, spoke to the Company
after receiving these emails.  They faxed to her a copy of the assumed  name
certificate wherein Northern Illinois Gas Company transacts business under
the name Nicor Gas Company.  Per her conversations they have not changed
their name, they are only operating under the assumed name Nicor Gas
Company.  Being so, the online account would have to be renamed as Northern
Illinois Gas company dba Nicor Gas Company.  Per my conversation with Stacy
Dickson, a physical gas lawyer, they still transact physical gas under their
master with Northern Illinois Gas Company.  I will have a copy of the assumed
name certificate walked down to Adnan.  If we are all in agreement after
this, it seems like we need two counterparty names "Northern Illinois Gas
Company" and "Northern Illinois Gas Company dba Nicor Gas Company".  Upon
receipt of the assumed name certificate, please confirm your agreement and I
will contact Credit and the Online team.

	Stacey Richardson
	08/17/2000 04:49 PM

		 To: Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Linda S
Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Northern Illinois Gas Company/Nicor Gas Company

OK, guys, based on Adnan's information from the counterparty, all contracts
under Northern Illinois Gas Company will be changed (via name overlay) to
Nicor Gas Company once Adnan has received the proper name change
documentation.   Since no changes have been made in GCP to correct the HQ
company and trade name relationships, the recent ISDA contract was set up
under Nicor Gas Company.  Once these changes are made in GCP, the contract
can be changed to the trade name if still needed at that time.

I apologize for all the confusion and hope this helps all parties concerned.

Thanks,
Stacey

Adnan Patel@ENRON on 08/17/2000 04:20:24 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Linda S
Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Northern Illinois Gas Company/Nicor Gas Company

Per my conversation with Nicor Gas Company's attorney, Northern Illinois Gas
Company changed its name to Nicor Gas Company. Therefore, Nicor Gas Company
is the only entity that all the deals needs to be booked under. However, the
attorney also agreed to the fact that they do use the name "Northern Illinois
Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas Company" eversince the name change happened. He
said they had been using both names "contractually" and interchangeably even
though it is all just ONE company, one state registered company.

I'm currently waiting on name change documents, however this is what it looks
like thats going to happen:
The main HQ company would end up being NICOR GAS COMPANY with all the
trades/contracts/deals being merged into one record. However, if need be we
could have a Tradename set up as "Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a Nicor
Gas Company" since this is how the company does business as, in some cases.

Nicor's legal Dept could be reached at (630) 983-8676 for any further
clarifications in this matter.

Adnan Patel
Global Counterparty
x58335

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 08/17/2000 03:47 PM
To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Northern Illinois Gas Company/Nicor Gas Company

There appears to be confusion over who and what products we should be trading
with these entities.

We have an ISDA Master Agreement in place with Northern Illinois Gas Company
d/b/a Nicor Gas Company.  This is a new master.  If the counterparty is not
set up this way it need to be.

Physical gas has a master in place with Northern Illinois Gas Company.

There is no master agreement in place with Nicor Gas Company and the only
trading being done with this entity is online gas trading.

The issue that needs to be resolved is whether we want to trade gas under
both Northern Illinois Gas Company and Nicor Gas Company.  Frank Davis will
resolve this issue with Tom Moran in Credit and Stacy Dickson with physical
gas Legal, and they will let us know who we should be trading with.

When we hear back from them we can finally resolve what counterparty names we
want to set up and get back to the counterparty if we have not received the
correct Password Application to match out intended trading partners.

Sorry for all the confusion this is causing.  I am confused too.


tanning at 4pm
go to walk in clinic
call jackie gowans

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


Why is she not being promoted down there, or staying within that
organization???

Johnny Palmer@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/03/2001 11:05 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT, Gary Hickerson@ECT
cc:
Subject: Manager Position

Jeff/Gary:

Are you aware of any management opportunities for Tracee's experience?
Please advise.

Thanks,
Johnny
54017

---------------------- Forwarded by Johnny Palmer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/03/2001 11:04 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Cindy Skinner @ ECT                           01/03/2001 10:31 AM

To: Shanna Funkhouser/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Johnny
Palmer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Manager Position

Please run her resume by the EGM heads to find out their interest level.
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT on 01/03/2001 10:34
AM ---------------------------

Janie Bonnard@EES
01/03/2001 10:01 AM
To: Shanna Funkhouser/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Manager Position

Shanna, Cindy;

Tracee is an ESA associate who is ready to promote out of the program into a
manager level position.  Could you take a look at her resume for potential
opportunities within EGM/EIM?  Thank you.

Janie
---------------------- Forwarded by Janie Bonnard/HOU/EES on 01/03/2001 09:52
AM ---------------------------

Tracee Bersani@ECT
01/03/2001 09:05 AM
To: Janie Bonnard/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Manager Position

Janie,

Per our telephone conversation, I am attaching my resume for your review. As
we discussed, I am seeking a permanent (Manager level) position where my
finance and origination skills would be best leveraged.  I am very interested
in a role in financing and/or orginating energy deals - wholesale or retail.
If you or one of the groups interested in interviewing me require a
reference, please contact my current supervisor, Rob Gay, or current and
former colleagues Peter Anderson and Greg Blair, respectively.

Thanks again for your help and advice.

Regards,
Tracee
x5-5688
email: tracee.bersani@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
10:27 AM ---------------------------
   Enron North America - Office of the Chairman

From: ENA Office of the Chairman@ENRON on 11/16/2000 08:12 PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Houston ENA&EIM&EGM
cc:
Subject: Holiday Invitation

Please click on the attached link to launch your Holiday Party invitation.

 http://invitation.enron.com

Please direct any questions to Dorie Hitchcock via email.


I understand your concern but negotiating your future position is part of the
agreement.

	Holli Krebs
	12/12/2000 01:34 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EWEB

I say let's forge ahead and get this deal done.  I will hold up on future
financial trades with them but this deal is of major concern.


I'm available any time Monday morning.  The sooner (after 830), the better.

Thanks,

Kay


I will be hosting an employee brown bag lunch meeting Wednesday, January 17,
beginning at 11:30 a.m. in Mt. Hood Conference Room.  Topics I will discuss
are listed below.

Why the shortage of power
Regulatory framework
California financial crisis
Political solutions

If you have questions about the energy crisis and how Enron fits into the
picture, this is your chance to get more information!


Dude, this needs your blessing.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Saucier, Darla
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 1:34 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject: