Shirley,

FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000
08:18 AM ---------------------------

"Francis X. Diebold" <fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu> on 12/18/2000 07:02:46 AM
To: Vince Kaminski <vkamins@enron.com>
cc: bmierts@enron.com
Subject: Thursday visit

Hi Vince, Looking forward to seeing you Thursday.? I arrive at Houston-Bush
on USAir 1769 at 10:55 AM.? Please let me know where to go.? I also want to
verify that you have booked me a hotel? for Thurs night.? Many thanks, and
see you soon, Frank

--
Francis X. Diebold
WP Carey Professor

Department of Economics
University of Pennsylvania
3718 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297

fdiebold@sas.upenn.edu
http://www.ssc.upenn.edu/~diebold

(215) 898-1507? telephone
(215) 573-4217? fax
?


Hey--how the hell are you?  Still having fun and living large in the big
apple?  Things are great on the prarie--Huskers are No. 1 in the nation (I'm
actually talking about college womens volleyball since I refuse to watch
professional Husker football) and wife and small chicks are doing great.  As
to SD firm, I've almost hired Lynn Jackson Schultz and LeBrun a couple of
times and then ended up not needing them.  I think its the biggest firm in SD
(big whoop)  and is pretty well thought of.  I went to college with a partner
in their Sioux Falls office named Jon Sogn.  He's a commercial litigator and
a pretty good guy.  Good luck and hope all goes well.  DF

"David N Schumeister" <dschumeister@shearman.com> on 09/18/2000 01:28:05 PM
To: dfossum@enron.com
cc:

Subject: South Dakota Counsel

---------------------- Forwarded by David N Schumeister/NY/NA/ShS on
09/18/2000
02:27 PM ---------------------------

Ruth Lipshitz
09/18/2000 01:44 PM

To:   New York - PR Partners, New York - PR Associates
cc:

Subject:  South Dakota Counsel

Can anyone please recommend a South Dakota counsel?

Thanks.

********************************NOTICE*************************************
This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client
communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential.  If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this
transmittal is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this transmittal
and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by
telephone (call us collect at +1 212-848-8400) and immediately delete this
message and all its attachments.

Thank you.


FYI for tomorrow's call.

Alan
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 08/28/2000 06:46 PM -----

	ppantano@mwe.com
	08/28/2000 06:35 PM

		 To: alan.aronowitz@enron.com
		 cc: klarsen@mwe.com
		 Subject: Preliminary Information for Conf. Call

Dear Alan:

     Attached is some preliminary MG registration and regulatory filing
information for our call tomorrow.

     Regards, Paul

(See attached file: MG Regulatory Filings.DOC)

Paul J. Pantano, Jr.
McDermott, Will & Emery
600 13th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Ph:    (202) 756-8026
Fax:  (202) 756-8087
Email:  ppantano@mwe.com

******************************************************************************
*******

This message is a PRIVATE communication.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to
others.  Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this
message, and then delete it from your system.  Thank you.
******************************************************************************
*******

 - MG Regulatory Filings.DOC


Thank you for the message - i need it today .  It is 2:35 and i am exhausted
- i need a cig and a beer.  I love you.

Sandra


- 11_27_01GO.xls
 - 11_27_01OH.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000
04:58 PM ---------------------------

"Richard MacMinn" <macminnr@uts.cc.utexas.edu> on 09/10/2000 09:50:28 AM
To: macminnr@uts.cc.utexas.edu
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject:

Dear Colleagues and Friends

As some of you may know, I accepted the Swiss Re Chair at the University of
Nottingham.  I have finally arrived.  All my email addresses will continue
to work.  My new address is in my signature.

Cheers
Richard

Richard MacMinn, Editor
The Journal of Risk and Insurance
The Swiss Re Chair in the Management of Risk
Centre for Risk and Insurance Studies
Nottingham University Business School
Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road
Nottingham, NG8 1BB
United Kingdom

JRI Office: 512 471 0018
Nottingham Office: 44 0115 846 6679
eFax: 305 768-0522

Journal: mailto:jri1@uts.cc.utexas.edu
Editor:  mailto:macminnr@uts.cc.utexas.edu
Other: mailto:richard.macminn@nottingham.ac.uk

JRI: http://www.aria.org/jri/
Editor: http://macminnrd.bus.utexas.edu:83/
Vita: http://home.austin.rr.com/macminn/

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing. Edmund Burke


Thank you!


Letting him stir is good in some ways but guys actually tend to like a lack
of clarity in relationships as it gives them more leeway.  However, I don't
really know the dynamic in your relationship at all.

So Angela and I made up from our huge saturday morning fight before I left on
Sunday and she cried like a baby when i left.  I feel so bad leaving her. She
is really broken hearted right now.


Ed

How are you doing on these reports.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 07/17/2000
09:38 AM ---------------------------

David W Delainey@ECT
06/29/2000 12:33 PM
To: Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy R
Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Monthly Mid Market Coverage Report

Ed, sounds like you have this handled - I would like to use your report as
the example to use in other groups.  It can wait until you have it all
completed.  You may want to think about EOL as well (ie) how many companies
have you brought on-line, etc.

 summary:
  - coverage metrics;
  - market iniatives;
  - completed deals;
  - hot list;
  - EOL metrics.

Thxs
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000
12:30 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Edward D Baughman                           06/29/2000 10:34 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy R
Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Monthly Mid Market Coverage Report

Dave:

I want to be sure I am on the right track for providing you ,John and Kevin
with meaningful account coverage data. I envision a one page
summary that provides you with a monthly and quarterly sub-region coverage
ratio. I propose that the quarterly coverage standard be set
at 100%. The monthly coverage standard would be at least 50%. These standards
would drive consistent, ongoing coverage of commercially
active customers. Less active or inactive customers would be contacted at
least once a quarter to determine status changes and propose
product structures. This reporting format would also place emphasis on each
commercial team's coverage effectiveness or lack thereof.  I will
derive this summary from a master customer list that will show contact dates
and specific comments on customer status. I anticipate this master
list to be 20-25 pages. I propose to provide you a copy of the master list
quarterly in order to corroborate the monthly summary. Do my proposed
coverage standards and reporting format meet your expectations?

In addition, I have asked my commercial teams to prepare regional business
plans by July 12. A primary component of these plans will be
identification of major new business initiatives by sub-region. Tammy
Shepperd asked me to provide you with an initial report this week. I
don't want to provide you with something "half-baked".  Is it acceptable to
allow my commercial teams to complete their plans then provide
you with our suggested initiatives by July 13 ?

Finally, I have provided Tammy with reports on 1st/2nd quarter completed
transactions plus a deal flow "hot list" .

Sorry for being verbose. Please advise.

Thanks,     Ed


John,

As a follow up to our deal, Scana Energy Marketing  purchased 2,047 dt from Enron North America at a price of $3.92 per dt.   The gas delivery is for June 1, 2001 only and the delivery point is Domion  Southpoint or CNG Southpoint.

George


It is okay to set Public Service Company of Colorado up to trade US East
power pursuant to the existing master agreement.  Noel, I'll leave it to you
to let Lance know that we are modifying their profile.

Please contact me at *36121 with any questions or comments.

Leslie


(See attached file: PowerMkts030402.pdf)
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


Yea ... the later the better.

Brian Hoskins@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
10/05/2000 03:18 PM
To: Fangming.Zhu@enron.com
cc: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Demo

Fangming,

I am out of town until tomorrow so will not be able to see the demo today.
Wednesday afternoon looks good for me if you'd like to do it then.  John,
does this work for you?

Brian

Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

	Fangming.Zhu@enron.com
	10/05/00 09:17 AM

		 To: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Allen.Elliott@enron.com
		 Subject: Demo

Hi, Brian:
Let me know if you have time for the messageboard application demo today. I
am planning to take vacation on Friday and coming Monday. I will not be
available to show you the demo until next Wednesday if you can't see it
today.

Let me know your schedule.

Thanks,

Fangming


This is just an example of how Enron got affected by ANEEL's decision to lower the spot price from R$684/MWh to R$336/MWh.  This Eucatex deal involved both a fixed payment and a variable payment (the latter based on a % of the spot price).

---------------------- Forwarded by Sami Arap/SA/Enron on 10/11/2001 01:47 AM ---------------------------

Marcelo Parodi
10/10/2001 08:39 PM
To:	Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Britaldo Soares/SA/Enron@Enron, Sami Arap/SA/Enron@Enron, Rubens Parreira/SA/Enron@Enron, Karla Azevedo/SA/Enron@Enron, Roberto Schloesser/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Szlejf/SA/Enron@Enron, Guy Ishikawa/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:	Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Eucatex deal renegotiated

We've re-negotiated the Eucatex deal in order to extract more value out of the transaction for Enron. According to the new structure the value of the deal will move from a negative U$1.1million to a positive U$0.1million. The old vs. new conditions are as follow:

Old deal (existing contract)
structure	: PPA (Enron buys the power)
volumes	: 12MW (6MW firm + up to 6MW interruptible)
pricing	: R$155/MWh (floor price) + 40% of the upside against MAE prices
term	: November 2001 to March 2003 (October 2001 on interruptible basis)
guarantees	: R$3.0 million surety bond issue by Malucelli Insurance Co. (Brazilian company)

New deal
Structure	: Call Option (Enron buys the call)
Volumes	: 11.5MW (9.0MW firm + up to 2.5 MW interruptible)
pricing	: R$60/MWh premium + R$107/MWh strike. Premium will be paid upfront to Eucatex (R$6.6million)
term	: same as above. Interruptible power generated in October will be purchased for R$220,00/MWh (fixed price).
guarantees	: surety bond of R$6.6million + commercial exposure (to be calculated by RAC). We are also considering to switch Mallucelli for an international insurance company, depending on RAC's view. Cost of the insurance will be paid by Eucatex. It is also important to stress that obtaining a solid surety bond is a condition precedent on executing the deal, and Eucatex is aware of that.

Rgds,

Marcelo


>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Ricky Archer
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 9:19 AM
> To: 'rlloyd@enron.com'
> Cc: 'Dfarmer@enron.com'; 'jyoung@enron.com'
> Subject: Calpine Daily Gas Nomination
>
>  <<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc


I wanted to thank each of you for your contributions to date on Project
Raptor.  By the end of the day, we will have successfully completed
incorporation of the public hedge candidates into the Raptor Structure.  I
appreciate the hard work that it took to get it done and apologize for being
a pain.  That's the good news.  The bad news is that the private hedge
candidates must be completed ASAP.  If you have any checklist response forms
that have not been completed for the private candidates, please complete and
return them to me immediately.  Many thanks.

Stuart


Have a Very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


One of the online team is looking for someone from Legal who is working with
(read "holding up things with") the Allegheny Energy people right now.  Any
of you got anything going on?


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/28/2000 02:30 PM
---------------------------

"Miller, Scott" <Scott.Miller@DPLINC.com> on 10/27/2000 04:07:04 PM
To: "'Don.Miller@enron.com'" <Don.Miller@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Scheduling of Meeting

Would you please email me the list of names of the ENRON participants in our
conf. call and the areas they represented.

Thanks

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don.Miller@enron.com [SMTP:Don.Miller@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 4:32 PM
> To: HGPMULLINX@aol.com
> Cc: Chris.Norris@enron.com; rnewlin@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keenan@enron.com
> Subject: Re: Scheduling of Meeting
>
>
> Thursday, the 26th.
>
> Time 1:30 -3:30 pm (CST)
>
>      888-380-9636
>      code# 840019
>
> If you have problems, please call me at 713-412-8967 (cell).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Don Miller
>

*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***

This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail
message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may
be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information.  It is
intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s).
If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this electronic mail message in error,
please forward the electronic mail message to security@dplinc.com and then
remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system.

*** The Dayton Power & Light Company. ***


FYI...

Here are the confirmations regarding what type of DASR the Joint UDC
Proposal addresses from each of the three UDCs.

PG&E
Rebecca:

In response to your questions regarding our latest Joint Proposal, here is
my answer to your specific questions below:

a) The DASR Cut-off etc mentioned in your recent filing indeed refers to
Connect DASRs only
As the primary purpose of the implementation of the suspension of DA is to
identify accounts that are eligible to go DA, the "DASR Cut-off" reference
is for CONNECT DASRs only.

b) All other DASRs, such as Disconnect and Updates, will continue to be
accepted regardless of any implementation of a Cut-off or not.
Disconnect and Update DASRs will continue to be accepted for existing
accounts and new accounts to be switched as proposed in our filing.

Thanks,
Calvin Yee
PG&E

SDG&E:
a) The DASR Cut-off etc mentioned in your recent filing indeed refers to
Connect DASRs only,

This is correct, the joint proposal refers to new connects

b) All other DASRs, such as Disconnect and Updates, will continue to be
accepted regardless of any implementation of a Cut-off or not.

Updates DASRs and terminations DASRs will continue to be accepted.

Lora Clay
Strategic Lead - ESP Relations
e-mail:  lclay@sdge.com

SCE:
I have seen the responses to Rebecca's questions from SDG&E (Lora Clay's
comments are included in the e-mail below) and PG&E (by separate e-mail to
Rebecca from Calvin Yee, not included here).  SCE would agree that the
Joint UDC proposal regarding a DASR cut-off date pursuant to the joint UDC
filing on 11/16/01 refers to:

1)  "Connect" DASRs only, and that
2)   under such a DASR cut-off, SCE would continue to accept "disconnect"
and "update" DASRs (for changes to billing and/or metering options) for
existing Direct Access customers (note: this is consistent with SCE's
previous communications regarding the subject of DASR cut-off date)

Jack Horne
Jack.Horne@sce.com

I have all three e-mails & will forward them to Dan today.

Rebecca

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Dan Douglass [SMTP:douglass@earthlink.net]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:00 AM
> To:	ARM; Jeff Dasovich
> Subject:	Draft AReM Filing - Comments Needed
>
> Attached for your review and comment is a redlined third draft of our
> comments due Wednesday on the UDCs' Joint Proposal re DA suspension
> implementation.  My thanks to Rebecca Schlanert and Jeff Dasovich for
> their comments.  Jeff's suggestions re Option 3 are included at the end of
> the draft.  The essential change from what the UDCs proposed is that the
> CPA verifications would go directly to the Commission rather than to the
> UDCs.  I thought up a few reasons in support of this approach, but would
> appreciate more suggestions and comments.
>
> Since this is due Wed., comments received by close of business tomorrow
> will get put into a proposed final draft to be circulated Wed. morning.
> Thanks!
>
> Dan
>
> Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
> 5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
> Woodland Hills, CA 91367
> Tel:   (818) 596-2201
> Fax:  (818) 346-6502
> douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com> << File:
> 11-28-01 ARM Comments - Draft 3_.doc >>


Still waiting to hear back about your possible visit.  Any word?

Kevin


FYI... just got this from Tony Leo.
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000
12:19 PM ---------------------------

"Leo, Tony" <tleo@fce.com> on 11/10/2000 12:16:59 PM
To: "'Stephen.Plauche@enron.com'" <Stephen.Plauche@enron.com>, "Bentley,
Chris" <cbentley@fce.com>, "Nock, Herb" <HNock@FCE.com>, "Leitman, Jerry"
<jleitman@fce.com>, "Levine, Ross" <rlevine@fce.com>, "'Jacqueline Scheib'"
<jscheib@rc.com>
cc: Michael.D.Nanny@enron.com, Terri.Austin@enron.com

Subject: RE: Other Items

Revised test protocol, which is now referred to as Exhibit D in the
contract.  While I am not showing the redlines, I had change-tracking on
during my edit so you can see them by clicking the other two checkboxes in
the Track Changes menu.  Note also that I am proposing that another
definition be added to the test - "Performance Test Procedures."  The
definition would read something like "Performance Test Procedures shall mean
detailed test procedures developed based on the Acceptance and Performance
Evaluation Testing Protocol (Exhibit D) which have been mutually agreed upon
by Purchaser and Seller,"

Tony

 <<Acceptance and Performance Test - Fuel Cells - 4.doc>>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen.Plauche@enron.com [SMTP:Stephen.Plauche@enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 7:27 PM
> To: Leo, Tony
> Cc: Michael.D.Nanny@enron.com; Terri.Austin@enron.com
> Subject: Other Items
>
>
> Tony,
>
>      In regards to FCE's test procedures and performance evaluation
> guidelines, can you provide ENA with the following items if you haven't
> already done so:
>
> 1.  clearly define the differences between base load and max guarantee
> output
>
> 2.  please review and provide ENA with the items for which plant
> performance shall be corrected as well as the correction factors for each
> item.
>
> 3.  confirm inclusion of items originally bracketed in list of auxiliaries
> to be accounted for.
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephen

 - Acceptance and Performance Test - Fuel Cells - 4.doc


Attached are summarized the main recommendations of the distco of the future paper and  their impact.
Most recommendations would have a positive impact on competition. However, some recommendations could be potentially dangerous. Besides, it does not have a clear position regarding unbundling: it opens too many unbundling possibilities and discards the extreme, and more effective (divestiture).
I will work on the default supplier paper today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 2:01 PM
To:	Canovas, Guillermo
Subject:	FW: DISCO of the Future Meeting 10/24/01 Agenda and Materials
Importance:	High

Are these papers consistent with Enron's positions?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Hope Duncan" <hduncan@caem.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 1:28 PM
To:	hduncan@caem.org
Subject:	DISCO of the Future Meeting 10/24/01 Agenda and Materials
Importance:	High

MEMORANDUM

TO: DISCO of the Future Participants
FR: Hope Duncan, Director of Administration
RE: Meeting Materials
DT: October 18, 2001

Please find attached the agenda for next week's DISCO meeting.  I also
have attached the materials for the meeting -- the regulatory white
paper and the POLR paper.

Please address all questions and/or comments regarding the
aforementioned materials during the meeting.

 - DISCO-Regulation-MembersDraft(010907v14).doc << File: DISCO-Regulation-MembersDraft(010907v14).doc >>
 - DISCO POLR Revised.doc << File: DISCO POLR Revised.doc >>
 - DISCO October Agenda.doc << File: DISCO October Agenda.doc >>


Durasoft (the company that did the Java class) will be holding a course on
COM object programming for Enron Networks.  COM allows for programs to be
written such that they are available for execution to other programs on a
language independent basis.  Several Research members are interested in this
technology.

The class is $15,000 for 15 people and NetWorks has a few spaces that are
unfilled.  We can send a few people, therefore, for about $1000 each.  The
course is May 14-18 (which conflicts with the EPRM 2001 Conference), so they
need a total soon.

Is this course something group members can sign up for?

Thanks,
Martin


whaddya mean, you think so?

	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	05/09/2001 11:04 AM

		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Can you be home

i think so

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:58 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: Can you be home

I'm serious.  Are you referring to the proposal that no one knows about
that everyone knows about?  We going to celebrate?

                    Nancy Sellers

                    <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:
"'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"
                    ndavi.com>                     <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>

                                                   cc:

                    05/08/2001 06:27 PM            Subject:     RE: Can you
be home

har har - don't tell though - I want it to be a surprise

> -----Original Message-----
> From:         Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [SMTP:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
> Sent:         Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:22 PM
> To:           Nancy Sellers
> Cc:           'Jeff Dasovich'; Prentice Sellers; Prentice @ Berkeley
> Subject:           Re: Can you be home
>
>
> What's Sunday?  Would that be "frog gras?"
>
>
>
>
>                     Nancy Sellers
>
>                     <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:     "'Jeff
> Dasovich'"
>                     ndavi.com>
> <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>, "Prentice @ Berkeley"
>
> <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, Prentice Sellers
>                     05/08/2001 04:29 PM            <PSellers@pacbell.net>
>
>                                                    cc:
>
>                                                    Subject:     Can you
be
> home
>
>
>
>
>
> for Sunday's dinner?  I think I will order some foie for myself!
>
> Nancy
> (707) 251-4870 (phone)
> (707) 265-5446 (fax)
> "Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
>
>
>
>
>
>


Kristin Gandy has sent you an Evite Invite!

To view your Invite, simply click the following Web address:
http://evite.citysearch.com/r?iid=EWFPZQLYXVCWYUZGPPNX

This Evite Invite is covered by Evite's privacy policy*.
To view this privacy policy, click here:
http://evite.citysearch.com/privacy

********************************
Workin' for the weekend? - With only two days to call your
own, you've got to make them count. The Citysearch Weekend Guide makes
workin' for the weekend worth it.
http://weekend.citysearch.com?cslink=nsltr-evite-invite

Need some help?  See below!
*********************************

Perhaps your E-mail program doesn't recognize the Web address as an active
link.  No problem!  You can copy and paste the Web address into your Web
browser.

Here are instructions on how to copy and paste:
a. With your mouse, highlight the *entire* Web address above
b. Select the EDIT menu and choose COPY
c. Go to your Web browser and *click inside* the window where
you normally type a Web address to visit
d. Select the EDIT menu and choose PASTE
e. Now hit ENTER on your keyboard to take you to the Web address

It's that easy! :-)

If you would like further assistance, we're happy to help - please send
E-mail to support@evite.citysearch.com

* Updated 01/09/01.


This message and any attachment(s) hereto are intended solely for the individual(s) listed in the masthead.  This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure.  Any review, dissemination or use of this message or its contents by persons other than the addressee(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the message from your system.  Thank you!

We filed the attached letter on behalf of CalPX in response to Judge Birchman's order.
Jim McGrew
Bruder, Gentile & Marcoux, L.L.P.
Counsel for California Power Exchange Corporation

 - BLF0727.DOC


We are pleased to announce the following promotions within Enron Net Works.
These promotions will be effective February 1, 2001.   We would like to thank
these individuals for their past contributions and recognize their
instrumental roles in the growth and success of the organization.  Please
join us in congratulating the following employees, and wishing them continued
success with Enron.

To Managing Director
Sally Beck

To Vice President  To Senior Specialist
David Forster  Luis Aybar
David Samuels  Matthew Burleigh
Jay Webb  Heather Busby
  Stephen(Steve) Harrington
To Senior Director  Wei Hu
Scott Mills  Aneela Charania
Kevin Sweeney  Diane Ellstrom
  David Rae
To Director  Shifali Sharma
Michael(Mike) Croucher  Gang(George) Ji
Rahil Jafry  Jorge Mancero
Savita Puthigai  Kirti Patel
Ganapathy Ramesh  Virendra Patel
Drew Ries  Raleigh(Trey) Rhodes
Stuart Reed  Mark Symms
Thresa Allen  Carlos Uribe
Jeffrey Gossett  Ye Wang
Kim Theriot  Amelia Alland
Stacey White  Cynthia Balfour-Flanagan
  Stacey Brewer
To Manager  Marlene Hilliard
Nilay Basu  Dawn Kenne
Frank Coles  Errol McLaughin
Mark Davidson  Kevin Meredith
Daniel(Dan) Dietrich  Meredith Mitchell
Colin Tonks  Thien-Huong Ngo
Danielle Marcinkowski  Brian Palmer
Kari Oquinn  Mark Schrab
Tai Nguyen  Stephanie Sever
Cornelio Pua  Christopher Spears
Amy Spoede  Tara Sweitzer
Gerald(Jake) Staffel  Sabrae Zajac
Vernell Vallejo
Jing Fang(Jennifer) Zhou  To Specialist
Christopher Abel  Robert Henry
David Baumbach  Benjamin(Ben) Jordan
Rebecca Ford  Nikolay Kraltchev
Ngiam(Jeremy) Wong  Grace Warren
Matthew Brown  Kenneth(Kenny) Lim
Clara Carrington  Victoria Sorkina
Richard Cross  Patrick Marchand
John Swinney  Sumit Shah
Maya Beyhum  Kori Loibl
Patricia Sullivan  Bruce Mills
Patricia Spence  Mathew Motsinger
Dimitri Taylor  Bernice Rodriquez
Darron Giron  Brandi Wachtendorf
Kristen Hanson  Patryk Wlodarski
Larry Hunter
William Kasemervisz  To Staff
Kam Keiser  Norma Yeverino
Monica Lande  Geralynn Gosnell
David Maxwell  Judith Walters
Melissa Ratnala  Richard Miley
  Joan Winfrey
Technical Consultant  Guy Freshwater
Xiaozhuo(Sean) Yang  Brent Storey
Show-Yien(Show) Lee  Stuart Thom
Nai-Chung(Jesse) Wang  Jonathan White
Jin Yu
  To Executive Assistant
Associate To Manager  Peggy McCurley
Jason Althaus  Tammie Schoppe
Cheryl Ingstad
Ross Mesquita  To Administrative  Coordinator
Leonardo Pacheco  Heather Choate

To Administrative Assistant I  To Senior Clerk
Ali De Hoyos  Matthew Davies
  Demonica Lipscomb
To Senior Assistant  Mark Pilkington
Barbara Lewis  Daniela De Lisi
Sarah Knott  Tresea Parker
Thais Hensch  Angela Barnett
 Laura Vargas


Thought you all might be interested in this...... It's a long long report on
Enron!
Bilal


A revised amount for the purchase demand fee: $2,405706.43.  Volumes were not
actualized correctly.
---------------------- Forwarded by Megan Parker/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
04:29 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Megan Parker                           12/07/2000 09:18 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Tenaska IV 10/00

We have actuals.  The larger of the two volumes is 1,395,000, which is
45,000/day, so the demand rate in deal 514353 is fine.  I am having a
problem, though, with the way it is coming to settlements.  It is showing up
with a Jan 2003 delivery date.  I think the demand fee needs to be on 10/1
only.  Right now, it is on a line with a date of 10/1/00 to 12/31/36.   I
think this is confusing the system some how.  Also, we still need the
purchase deal for Tenaska IV.  It should be for a demand fee of $2,571,135.73
booked to the Cleburne desk.  We actually owe $1,798,389.73, but I need to
net the Tenaska IV sales with the purchase to clear those receivables.  James
is calling me every day asking for an update.  Do you know when we will be
able to get this in the system?  I have attached my spreadsheet so you can
see the numbers.

Megan


My new address is:  1920 Banks St., Houston  77098.  I would love to come to
your dinner party!

	Mary Cook
	12/11/2000 08:38 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Address for Mary

Give me your new address please!!!!  Thanks.

Also, I am giving myself a small dinner birthday party Saturday night
(Hollis, the Hammons, Barbara and Ed) and would like you to come to if you
can.  Let me know.  Mary

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


I am working on an analysis of the details of the Barton draft RTO language.  While it is highly objectionable and our goal is to kill it, to do so we need to respond to requests to be specific about why we don't like it.  One of the more objectionable provisions says that FERC can't change the scope, governance, etc. of any RTO that has been "approved" under Order 2000 prior to enactment of the legislation.

If this applies to PJM, the legislation would stop the Northeast-wide RTO in its tracks since several of you and PJM's Phil Harris testified last week that FERC has "approved" PJM.  By contrast, committee staff and the section-by-section they distributed on the RTO legislative proposal say that to date FERC has NOT approved any RTOs under Order 2000.  They say that the legislative language would not apply to any RTO as of this date because FERC approvals of PJM, Cal ISO and NePool have been approved under the "ISO principles" of Order 888.

Your thoughts on the above would be helpful. Either way, I think we can argue that the provision shows why the Barton proposal is a retrenchment rather than an advancement on RTOs.  If it does not apply to PJM and the others as they contend, there is no good reason to include it other than to "freeze" the process at FERC merely by having the legislation pending on the Hill, much less enacted into law.


no... i went with matt thurell from koch.  they've got some corporate
townhouse out there.  very nice.  good to see the old days of waste aren't
completely gone yet.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 02/05/2001 06:59:36 AM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: v/x

did you happen too meet my friend dwight anderson down there? a good guy. im
gonna take a wild gues since he was there and you were there and hes an enron
customer there is a good chance you guys were in the same place!! i got to
stay
at one of those swanky enron beaver creek chalets a few years ago so i know
whats up.
   this weather disappoints again.

John.Arnold@enron.com on 02/04/2001 10:13:24 PM

To:   Steve LaFontaine/GlobalCo@GlobalCo
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: v/x

i actually started writing this on thursday.  got distracted and left late
morning to go to Vail.  Apparently I missed a little craziness.  My point
on v/x is that forward spreads, months 3/4 and back, don't necessarily
trade on value, they trade on drawing a forward curve that makes
equilibrium between hedging and spec demand.  Look at k/m... do you think k
cash will average 3 cents above m.  i don't really see that scenario.  yet
that's what it is worth because the market says jv is worth $x and to get
there k/m=3.  The same argument applies to v/x.  i think this summer will
be exceptionally strong as we try to inject 2 bcf/d more gas than last
year.  But cal 2 will lag the move.  It's the main thing customers are
selling right now because every equity analyst and even Pira are telling
their customers that cal 2 will average 3.50.  so either the v/x and x/z
spreads come in or f/g g/h h/j blow out.  After this winter, who in there
right mind wants to buy f/g or g/h again.  my thought is that the primary
juice will be h/j but v/x and x/z will be under some pressure.  i'm a
seller at 9 and buyer at 5-6.  Not much in it either way though.

slafontaine@globalp.com on 01/31/2001 04:47:22 PM

To:   John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: v/x

you got me wrong-i wanna sell oct buy nov forward. look-two scenarios med
longer
term. we inject like mad early summer-economy stays crappy the frot of the
curve
gets slaughtered.-oct/nov goes to 3 cts sometime between now and end sep
   scenario 2-they dont enject what they want-oct /nov wil stay tite
between say
3-and 10 cts like this year but man after this winter they will panic at
some
point and buy the hell out of the winter strip and blow out oct /nov to 30
cts
cuz they panic. to me if that one was to ever backwardate it was this
summer-low
low stx and injections and they still blew out cuz they panicked about
winter-as
we see this winter now for good reason..?? capeche? i thinkit a win win

 you still in the damn mar/apr-i only sold a little prenumber-cant beleive
how
this got killed after-what changed?? from 1:30 to 2:05

John.Arnold@enron.com on 01/31/2001 05:41:45 PM

To:   Steve LaFontaine/GlobalCo@GlobalCo
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  Re: v/x

quit pressuring them    i want to sell some too.  actually sold a few at 9
on the close

slafontaine@globalp.com on 01/31/2001 12:40:07 PM

To:   John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: v/x

i hate hate that sprd-at 8 cts i think its such a good bearsprd-hope it
keeps
coming in. ill tell you why later


The following would be used only in response to media questions regarding
PG&E credit exposure.

Enron does not comment on specific credit exposures.  We are confident we
have established adequate reserves related to energy issues in California and
regardless of what happens there we are also confident we will meet our 2001
(recurring) earnings per share estimate of $1.70-$1.75.

(If pressed on the accuracy of the amount listed in PG&E's declaration)
There are lots of numbers being tossed around for all parties that are owed
money by PG&E.  All of them are subject to to modification as information is
corrected or updated.  The numbers in PG&E's initial filing were estimates
based on six month old PG&E data that may have been assembled very quickly.

(If pressed on the amount in the creditor committee letter)  Enron will not
comment on specific credit exposures.  We will not confirm or deny any such
numbers rumored to be in confidential correspondence.  Any number presented
would need to be further examined relative to collateral, reserves and other
credit offsets available under the circumstances.  Again, we are very
confident that no event related to this issue will prevent us from meeting
our 2001 (recurring) earnings per share estimate of $1.70-$1.75.

If we are asked if we filed to be on the creditor committee, I would confirm
that we did, and we are.

Mark


Attached is the Weekly deal report for 8/9/01-8/15/01.

Lex Carroll
Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
Midwest Region
713-853-5426


so you are a lucky one!  my face is so red!  it is funny!  where are you going?  i am not at all happy with you today.  you are mean!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

so i think i am going to get out of here soon


This is how I propose to add the language, and Leslie says it is okay.  Please confirm ASAP.

	WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth herein, ENA respectfully requests that the Commission require El Paso to immediately begin refunding demand charges for firm capacity that shippers have nominated but not been able to utilize because of system inadequacies, convene further proceedings to address the complex issues raised by the commenters in response to the El Paso receipt point allocation proposals, and give such guidance as it can, in response to the numerous arguments and assertions made in the Initial and Reply Comments, to help the parties craft a mutually acceptable resolution of the capacity allocation at issue in this case.


Wes, please have the detailed HPL numbers available to discuss on Monday.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000
09:34 PM ---------------------------

Brian Redmond
07/19/2000 03:02 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy J
Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michael C Bilberry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Todd Busby/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Project Triple Lutz/Tarantula

Team:

I have scheduled a meeting for 2 August to review our Triple Lutz and
Tarantula deliverables.  A preliminary summary of our current status is as
follows:

1.  Entex Contract - (John L.)
 -  T. Martin cost to unwind Texas desk P/L (incl. Entex) = $134.881MM
 - J. Schwieger cost to unwind storage book = $28MM

2.  Storage Value Algorithm - (Jean M., John L., Jim S.)
 - J. Mrha discussions with J. Schwieger and J. Lavo continuing
 - Working on reconciling EOY balancing and modeling physical storage
constraints

3.  Storage Acquisition Targets - (Jean M., Julie G.)
 - Target list prepared, preparing facility costs analysis.

4.  Bammel Header - (Jean M.)
 - Analyzing Northern Texas and Beaumont Markets

5.  Project Torque: (Wes C., J. Coffey)
 -  P/L established based on physical gas flow from POPS system and $ flows
  from general ledger.  No direct tie to UNIFY settlements information
  but now numbers are reconcilable
 -  1999 Margin Summary
  Gross Margin = $111MM (not including financial trading),
  Net Margin = $101MM
  EBITDA (HPL standalone before G&A) = $48MM
  EBITDA (HPL standalone) = $35MM
 -  Book Value Summary
  Non-Houston BV of  $398MM (incl. $129MM monetizations)
  Houston BV (incl. FV) = $2.3 bn  + Texas & Storage P/L unwind of $163MM
   requires a lease payment for Houston assets
   of $19MM over 30 yrs
  Pad gas BV = $153MM  (on basis of $2.34/mmBtu) not included in above
  Working gas BV = $116MM (on basis of $2.34/mmBtu) not included in above

6.  HPL Acquisition (T. Detmerming):
 -  Base Case Structure:  sale of non-Fair Value assets, 30 yr. lease of FV
assets
  Both bidders want ENA to provide/contribute trading and business operations
  services.
 -  Duke Field Services:  interested in base case structure, wants ENA to
provide
  trading services on a contract basis under a JV arrangement (Bridgeline)
 -  AEP:  interested in base case structure, wants ENA to sell trading desk
(and
  potentially provide business operation services under a service
arrangement)
 -  Info memo being prepared to be delivered in August, data room being
formed.

David W Delainey
07/05/2000 12:33 PM
To: Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Project Triple Lutz/Tarantula

Guys, as a follow up to our meeting today, I thought I would put together a
list of deliverables agreed to in the meeting.  The goal would be to have a
definitive strategy for HPL and storage assets by the end of July that could
be acted upon.

 a) Elimination of the Entex contract - current value - John L.;
 b) Storage value algorithm incorporating spread values, increasing intra-day
and monthly volatility and blowdown values - Jean M, John L, Jim S.;
 c) Storage acquisition targets and issues surrounding value/execution - top
5 to 10 for blowdown and tarantula strategy - Jean M, Julie G.;
 d) Structure, value, cost and issues surrounding Bammel "header" - Jean M.;
 e) Project Torque - definitive balance sheet, income statement and
contribution margin statement for HPL - Wes C.;
 f) Establish viability of selling HPL assets - small private placement -
working with Lehman to finalize value, exection risk, timing, structure et al
- Patrick   W.

 I would like this group to get back together in the fourth week of July to
determine a final action plan.

Regards
Delainey


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/20/2001>, published as of 11/20/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Hey Buddy!!!!  Wrong worksheet.

	From:  Jim Homco                           04/02/2001 11:58 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: March Doyle


Outside of moving the deals to another book, I don't think you can avoid
liquidating at the end of the month.  So I'm going to leave these in the
portfolio.

Thanks for the info.
Robin

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  David Baumbach                           11/16/2000 02:40 PM

To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: OutDated Book IDs

Robin, the book for Todd Richardson is technically dead.  We are the deals
that are in there monthly.  Is there a better way to do this?  We hate having
to remember to liquidate it at the end of the month.  I think it deals in
there until Aug 2001.

Dave

Robin Rodrigue
11/16/2000 02:32 PM
To: Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott
Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Souad
Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Bilal Bajwa/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: OutDated Book IDs

Please review the attached file.  The books listed for each trader are marked
for removal from the portfolio.  If you are currently using one of these
books or will be using it in the future please highlight the book id in
YELLOW.  If the book is no longer used please highlight the book id in BLUE.
When you have finished please return the file to me.

Thanks for your help,
Robin


Please find the attached spreadsheets listing the unfinaled sales invoices
for May production.  We have indicated which group is responsible for the
outstanding item in the "Responsible Department" column.  The Settlement
coordinator is also listed on these spreadsheets.  Please have your team
members contact the coordinators directly for the information needed to final
the invoice.

As communicated last week in our meeting with Sally, the deadline for
completing this work so that the invoices can be finaled is Friday, June 16,
2000.  We appreciate any efforts your teams can make in expediting the
research to ensure we can final all May invoices by the end of day Friday.

Thank you for your support and cooperation in these efforts.

Lisa


Notes to the Report
1.	Exposures are all provided from the perspective of Enron Canada.  Therefore a positive number means Enron Canada is "In the Money" (ie. dollars should be paid to us) and a negative means that Enron Canada is "Out of the Money".

2.	All dollars are US.

3.	This report uses the December 11, 2001 curve data for calculating mark to market positions.  The receivables and payables include outstanding payments or receipts from November physical business and December financial business, as well as projected December physicals for the period of flow during the month.

Jason

Enron Canada Corp.
3500 Canterra Tower
400 - 3rd Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 4H2
Tel:	(403) 974-6717
Fax:	(403) 974-6706

This information is provided to you pursuant to your request and is provided solely for informational purposes and without prejudice or limitation to any rights of Enron Canada Corp. or any of its affiliates.  This information reflects internal calculations made by Enron Canada Corp. which may or may not have been calculated in accordance with the provisions of any agreements between Enron Canada Corp. or any of its affiliates and you, and such information is subject to change at any time.  Further, Enron Canada Corp. and its affiliates make no representation or warranty, and shall have no liability whatsoever, relating to the accuracy, currency or completeness of this information and no person receiving this information shall, or is entitled to, rely on this information in any manner whatsoever.  This information is not intended to, and shall not in any way, bind or otherwise impose any legal or equitable obligation on Enron Canada Corp. or any of its affiliates (which are expressly released).


The report named: West VaR <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=36&report_name=West+VaR&category_cd=2&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=2&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/30/2001>, published as of 11/30/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


This is a notification that a 5 Day Cumulative Loss ocurred for EOL Crude
24/7 Trading on June 20, 2001 in the amount of $4.7 million.  The limit
established for EOL Crude is $3.75 million.

No signature is required on this notification.

Chris Abel
x33102


SmartMoney.com	  SmartSaver  for  Banking

TOOLS	[IMAGE]	MAPS	[IMAGE]	STOCKS	[IMAGE]	FUNDS	[IMAGE]	PERSONAL FINANCE	[IMAGE]	ECONOMY &
BONDS
												[IMAGE]

												Sponsored By: JP  Morgan
												[IMAGE]

Let JP Morgan be your guide. Morgan Online
Let JP Morgan be your guide. Morgan  Online
We don't have a crystal ball.  Our  instruments are far more optically
precise.  Let our patent pending analytic systems help you tune your
portfolio to the maximum efficiency. Get comprehensive wealth management
advice for the discerning  at Morgan OnLine by logging on at
http://morganonline.com/jp/ today.
(c)J.P. Morgan & Co.  Incorporated. J.P. Morgan is the marketing name for
J.P. Morgan  & Co. Incorporated and its subsidiaries worldwide. Morgan
Guaranty Trust Company of New York and J.P. Morgan FSB are FDIC  insured.
Brokerage and investment services are provided by J.P.  Morgan Advisory
Services Inc., member of NASD and SIPC. Investments  may decline in value,
including potential loss of principal.  Investments are not FDIC insured and
are not guaranteed by a  bank.

If you have any questions or problems, please email us  at:
helplist@smartmoneylist.com

To unsubscribe or change your preferences, visit our site  at
http://www.smartmoney.com/misc/ml/index.cfm?story=maileradmin.  If you're
having difficulties viewing this newsletter, you should  change your
preferences to "Text" at the above  URL.

Home | Contact Us | Customer Service | Search | Symbol Lookup |  Five-Day
Archive

SmartMoney.com  (c) 2000 SmartMoney. SmartMoney is a joint publishing venture
of Dow  Jones & Company, Inc.and Hearst Communications, Inc. All Rights
Reserved.
Please read our terms and conditions and our privacy  statement.


Paul is out of the office today but I found the customer name in my notes -
it was right below all my notes on CanFibre.  The customer is Latrove Steel.
I'm going to call Peoples myself to learn how this works.  Does anyone object
to that?  I will wait until this afternoon before I call.

Heidi
Do you think the production gas can be moved to EES's pool by July 1st?  If
not, we can sell the gas to Latrove out of CES's pool for July.  However, we
will not see the fuel credit until August(???) to verify if this works or not.

Marde L Driscoll@EES
06/21/2000 08:29 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alain Diza/HOU/EES@EES, Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Peoples

Questions that I have:
1)  I am assuming that the Clinton end-user will not go into EESs' pool.  It
needs to be verified with PNG that I can do a pool to pool nomination to the
end-user (only a few stand alone customers are grandfathered to receive these
types of noms.)  This is a critical issue for EES as we are already long gas
behind the gate and we don't need more production.  If the customer can't
take my gas from my pool then I will have to bring it in via CNG which will
only make my pool longer.

2)  If the production meters are moved to EESs' pool then I would suggest
just a flat index price between ENA and EES.

3)  Will EES be supplying the full 1000/d to the end-user or just the amount
of the local production transferred to EESs' pool?

4)  If the fuel credit works the way Chris explains it below then I would be
willing to sell all of the gas at index but I will need to confirm that with
PNG.

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES@ECT, Alain Diza/HOU/EES@EES@ECT, Heidi
Griffith/DUB/EES@EES@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson
Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Peoples

1. ENA is responsible for purchases of 500 MCFD (515 DthD) Metered Prouction
from Phillips Production Company.  This volume is will be decreased  until
further notice because PNG has increased line pressures thus reducing the
production volumes to 50-60% of normal (Refer to attached schedule).  There
are 7 Phillips meters  in CES's pool beginning July 2000.  Heidi Boyd @ CES
will have to nominate the production into CES's pool and away from the pool
until the meters are moved.  EES should have 6 Phillips Production meters in
their pool beginning July 2000.

2.  See Attached Schedule for Term, Price & Volume.

Note:  PNG has increased line pressures which reduces production into the
system.  Both Phillips Production and Power Gas Marketing are claiming Force
Majeure.  Their volumes have been reduced to 50-60% of the original contractd
volume.

Chris Germany@ECT
06/20/2000 03:59 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marde L Driscoll/HOU/EES@EES, Alain
Diza/HOU/EES@EES, Heidi Griffith/DUB/EES@EES
cc: Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Peoples

Here is what I'm looking at for July 1.  Paul Leanza (Clinton) has a customer
that can take around 1,000 day.  I don't know if that's dt or mcf.  I will
use mcf for this email until someone corrects me.  This customer has a
special deal where the pool operator gets a fuel credit on every mcf the
customer pulls.  For July, assuming the gathering fuel is 5%, and this
customer pulls 95 mcf from your production pool, you will get a 5 mcf
credited back to your imbalance account the following month.  I don't know
how this works with trading imbalances.  But, at a NYMX of $3.95 that works
out to $.21 - sounds good to me.  Paul said this customer is looking for a
CNG Index Flat price or and equivalent basis number.  Marde will not sell at
that price but I will.

Marde said she would charge ENA a $.03 fee for all the volumes flowing.
Actually, I would prefer to move all the pool and production gas to EES,
settle up financially with EES and be done with it.  What we could do to test
Paul's statement, is have the customer pull 300 mcf/day out of CES's pool for
July.  It would be easy to see since that is the only deal.   AND, have EES
take over the pool deal with Power Gas Marketing.  Comments / Questions?

Questions
John
1.  Heidi (EES) said you already have some Phillips production in EES's
pool.  Does CES still have metered production from Phillips in CES's pool?
If yes, how many meters?

2.  Please give me the following info for the activity behind Peoples
  Phillips   Power Gas Marketing
Term
Price
Volume

Heidi (EES)
If we find out from John that there is still metered production in CES's
pool, please call Peoples and see if we can move the metered production to
EES's pool for July.  Heidi Boyd with CES said you could tell them that CES
is going out of business and they may make exceptions for that.

Marde
I would prefer to move both supply customers over to EES, where EES makes the
payments and bills either Clinton or Clinton's customer.  At what price will
you take these deals?  I assume we need to get this info from John before you
can anwser this.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 06/20/2000 02:51
PM ---------------------------

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           06/19/2000 01:52 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Peoples

As of today, Power Gas Marketing volume has decreased from 7,500 per month to
4,000 per month, until further notice, due to Peoples regulating the volume
of production into their system.

Phillips Production is also down..

For July, I would sell 4, 000 per month supplied by Power Gas Marketing (pool
to pool), and 300 MCFD x 1.03 = 309 Dth/day metered production from Phillips
Production.  The Phillips Production meters are in CES's pool.  It will cost
$100 per transaction to do a pool to pool transfer.  If Paul Leanza can use
the gas through November, we should move the Phillips meters to his pool
(309/Day).  The Power Gas volumes go through October.

John


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
3/7/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
3/7/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
3/7/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 618,898.
3/7/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 171,473.
3/7/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 742,902.


Probably Ben Jacoby.  Let me veryify this with Jeff Keenan.

Thanks,
Eric

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Booth, Eric
Subject: C of A

Who will/can sign the turbine contract for Enron?

Thanks,

Kay


Daren,

FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000 09:32
AM ---------------------------

Vance L Taylor
06/27/2000 09:24 AM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: July 2000 - HPL Estimates and Nominations

Bob,

Please see EOG's July nomination.  You'll notice that it's about a 5,000/d
increase.

vlt
x3-6353
---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000
09:23 AM ---------------------------

Suzanne_Saldivar@eogresources.com on 06/26/2000 04:36:50 PM
To: jaustin@ect.enron.com, alannou@ect.enron.com, crodrig@enron.com,
tacton@enron.com, vance.l.taylor@enron.com, mandy_mackinnon@enron.com,
Susan_Smith@ECT.com
cc: Lee_Hileman%EOGRESOURCES@eogresources.com,
Shirley_Keeney@eogresources.com, Carol_McBeath@eogresources.com,
Tim_Vogler%EOGRESOURCES@eogresources.com
Subject: July 2000 - HPL Estimates and Nominations

(See attached file: HPL Avails_Jul 2000.xls)
 - HPL Avails_Jul 2000.xls


FYI    The 4,000 the East Desk bought from Ontario for tomorrow will probably
get constrained but we wanted to try it.


Can you guys review this posting prior to Tuesday morning?  Thanks.


Rosalee --

Attached is the final version of the call memo for Dr. Lay.  Please call if you have any questions.

Many thanks,
Larry

(202) 466-9163


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
05:25 PM ---------------------------

Mike Grigsby
01/09/2001 02:26 PM
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New Generation Report, December 1999

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001 03:26
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Matt Motley                           01/05/2001 08:30 AM

To: Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Generation Report, December 1999

---------------------- Forwarded by Matt Motley/PDX/ECT on 01/05/2001 06:34
AM ---------------------------

Kristian J Lande

01/02/2001 06:15 PM

To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W
Vickers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elliot Mainzer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT,
David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Jim Buerkle/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jim
Gilbert/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff G Slaughter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed
Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Cadena/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jonalan Page/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Todd Perry/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Oh/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Generation Report, December 1999


Gerald,
Thanks for your comments.  I've made a few revisions (hightlighted in BLUE); in particular, I've clarified the Capital Expenditures Section 4 (we want to differentiate the transmission line from the remainder of the capital estimates).  We are still working on the items in red and in yellow.

One question for you in Section 8.  Why did you add the following sentence "Oakhill would maintain ownership and responsibility for all maintenance of the reciprocating gas compressors throughout the contract term"?  Its not clear to me why we'd include a sentence on gas compression.  Let me know.

Thanks, Lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Druzbik, Lisa
Cc:	Hilgert, Chris; Knippa, Mark
Subject:	LOI Oakhill

Lisa,  I made significant revisions to this form.  Please review and lets discuss.

 << File: OakhillLOI(10-3-01).doc >>


Attached is a proposal that was shared with PERC last week.  We are now
awaiting PERC's response.  I am assuming that they will agree to the terms
since their alternative is to lose $ on the units at resale with no
opportunity for recapture.

I wanted to give you a "heads-up" since the timing will be is tight once I
get the green light to proceed with legal docs.  Please let me know what
documents we will need and how you suggest we expedite the process (LOI or
otherwise).

Calumet Project Participation (with ABB's):
ENA has verbally told them we will not participate in Calumet and the LLC
term to get to execution has expired.
Upon release by Laura/Ben - need to send them formal notice under the PDA
that we are withdrawing our notice of interest to participate in Calumet.

Going Forward:
We need to put the general terms in the proposal into a formal document.
Letter of Intent authorizing us to take control of the development/site sales
process at our expense - if they the deal unwinds we get reimbursed for our
direct costs spent to further perfect/sell their sites.
Assess PERC's legal position with ABB (was it fraud or gross negligence that
ABB failed to mention this problem they've known about for 10 years?).
Authorization/indemnification from PERC to negotiate with ABB to grant
contract concessions that will benefit Enron Canada as subsequent owner.
Enron Canada will likely be involved as lead negotiater with ABB - who in
legal will work with ENA/Enron Canada on this ?

Timing:
Enron Canada - To meet their 2001 schedule we need to have legal
authorization to engage ABB by early-July.
"Pitch Book" - In its current form includes Calumet/Torrence we need
authorization from PERC - Bruce is expecting to begin circulation by week of
July 10th.
EPC contractors -  They bid Calumet using ABB, and we want them to re-bid for
LM 6000's.  Need authorization from PERC (July 14th or sooner) with cost
coverage provisions, since the EPC contractors are likely to want to charge
us $50-$100k to re-bid the deal.


i know and its really depressing at first until you start to see results, im going to be really sore for skiing, anyway what do you have going on this week

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:43 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i am running mtm's for george.  BORING!!!  we just got back about 15 minutes ago.  you will get there.  it takes time and it is not fun!  :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:42 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

my work out was ok, im so damn out of shape but im committed to go every day now, i want to lose 20 pounds by march 1, anyway, i went to barnabys with john sandra, and andy, what are you doing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 1:22 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

i think that we just saw you driving.  did you leave for lunch?  how was your workout?


RT-

The new El Paso URL is:
http://172.17.172.62/rt/

Click on current.asp to have the page automatically refresh.
The file !current.txt contains the data.

All historical data is in the folders listed on this site.  All past historical data that is not available on the current site ison the P drive under P:\trading\california\realtime.

Going forward, all El Paso data WILL be collected.  Please be aware that the El Paso scrape may change in the future because of the transition of servers from Estate over to Netco.

John Oh
Enron North America		503.464.5066
121 SW Salmon Street		503.860.7983 (cell)
3WTC 0306			503.464.3740 (fax)
Portland, OR 97204			John.Oh@Enron.com


And you are moching me for peace out..


Sounds to me like this guy is full of shit!.   As seems to be typical for
most of those retards that used to work for Wilshire.


Been on two panels in the last two weeks with Florio--most recent yesterday.
Dan Richard of PG&E was also on yesterday's panel.  Mike has now come so far
as to push the "core/noncore" split a la the gas industy publicly (if you
just wait long enough, people come around).  Dan Richard did not object.  I
am pretty suspect about PG&E, though.  Dan Richard said things like:

I'm one of the people in my company who believes that, over time, the utility
should exit the procurement function, but many policy makers want PG&E to act
as a "quasi-governmental" body offering reliable, low cost service to small
customers.
I don't think anyone wants anyone's mother to be thrown to the competitive
market willy nilly.
People have to understand that the large customers are going to take all of
the "good" power, leaving the "dregs" for small customers.

While I'm skeptical of PG&E--Dan said what he knew people wanted to hear but
there was little conviction behind the words--there is certainly an opening
that we should try to exploit.

In addition, Florio is now publicly agreeing pretty strongly that the gas
model for utility procurement is one that merits a heck-of-a-lot of
attention, i.e., set a benchmark, get the CPUC out of the way, and let the
utility live or die by the benchmark.

There's daylight among the stakeholders, but a very large amount of
uncertaintly regarding whether the administration, its appointees, and/or the
Legislature will get on board.

Best,
Jeff

	Mona.L.Petrochko@enron.com
	11/13/2000 06:37 PM

		 To: Susan.J.Mara@enron.com, jdasovic%.enron.com@enron.com,
Sandra.McCubbin@enron.com, Joseph.Alamo@enron.com, Marcie.Milner@enron.com,
Paul.Kaufman@enron.com, Lysa.Akin@enron.com, Mary.Hain@enron.com,
Alan.Comnes@enron.com, Roger.Yang@enron.com, Harry.Kingerski@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: ARM met w/ Mike Florio

ARM had a good meeting with Mike Florio, TURN, on Friday on defining the
utilities default role and more rationale to the forward contracting.  My
walk away was as follows:

1.  TURN agrees with the big guys out first, and the utilities default role
defined to residential and small commercial customers.  Where you draw the
line (20 kW, 50 kW or 100 kW) is probably debatable.

TURN thinks SDG&E will be receptive, PG&E is thinking along similar lines
and that SCE is most resistant, but could be coaxed.

He thinks that CMTA/CLECA probably don't like it, but they will be in the
minority.  He met w/ John Stevenson, Governor's staff, who was receptive,
as was Carl Wood.

2.  He agreed that you need definition of the utilities default role to
provide direction on forward contracting.  Although, we all recognized that
the rules around reasonable behavior were preventing utilities from
entering into contracts.  We discussed up-front reasonableness.  Mike
seemed to be warming to the virtues of a competitive bid process in
determining a reasonable price.

3.  The idea of competitive default provider may need some proving.  He
felt SDG&E was the best place to start.  Michael Shames, UCAN, seems
interested in the idea.

4.  An important component of default service, at least initially, is
certainty of price for small consumers.  We discussed different ways of
providing certainty.  The utility could set a price, up front, and have to
manage its costs to meet that price.  No balancing account.  Utilities at
risk/reward.  We also discussed ways to keep the utilities honest on the
price.  One way is competitive default provider.  Another way is
competitive bid for portions of its portfolio.

5.  Discussed three components of utility procurement:  existing
generation, forward contracts and spot purchases.  Existing generation
would be valued.  Question about whether market prices would establish
price of output or some interim revenue requirement, as proposed by SCE on
its hydro resources.  Mike also seems to have softened over future
divestitures so long as there is some kind of interim buy-back contract
with the utility.

Will be at AB 1890 Implementation Group Meeting Tuesday and Wednesday
talking to other parties.


Attention POWER REPORT Readers: Go to
http://www.powermarketers.com/prdaily.htm to view today's edition with direct
headline links to each story.]

======================================================================
The Industry's Preferred Source For Breaking Energy News And Information
http://www.powermarketers.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
T H E P O W E R M A R K E T E R S .C O M P O W E R R E P O R T

Today's Headlines From POWERMARKETERS.COM

Subscriptions to The PowerMarketers.com Power Report are free - you will
never be charged.

You may redistribute this e-mail without change. You may not redistribute
stories.

To register for a free subscription, point your browser to:
http://www.retailenergy.com/pma/dprreg.htm

************************************************************************

Attend the Power Marketing Association?s annual spring meeting:

          POWER MARKETS 2001: CRISIS AND OPPORTUNITY

                March 14-16, 2001 Las Vegas

http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agenda.pdf

EVERY CRISIS HOLDS OPPORTUNITIES:

Power shortages boost merchant power, distributed generation, peak shaving,
real-time pricing and energy management. Some states are delaying their
retail choice programs, but others are moving ahead, confident that they have
benefited from the lessons learned by the pioneering jurisdictions. Electric
price volatility drives growth in the risk management business.

Credit and cash flow are squeezed, but financial products provide solutions.
Gas price volatility is a reminder-- coal was and remains the great source of
energy for our country. Dot-coms seem to have been exposed as just ordinary
businesses-- but online trading in energy is the single most robust area for
transactions on the net. The IPO market hasn?t been kind to technology
stocks-- but it likes energy issues. Broadband trading has been slow to take
off, but powerline telecom may solve the real problem-- access to "the last
mile".

Please join us at the Power Marketing Association?s annual spring meeting,
"POWER MARKETS 2001: CRISIS AND OPPORTUNITY" March 14-16, 2001 Las Vegas, for
presentations on these topics and more!

Warmest Regards,
Glenn Lovin
Executive Director

http://www.pmaconference.com/0103Agenda.pdf

************************************************************************

------Advertisement------

How do I find people who know how to account for trading activity
properly?
Are we hedging properly to limit our exposure?
Do we have the right policies, procedures, and controls to make sure
that we are not at risk?
How do I find energy trading software that fits my unique business
requirements?
Are we reporting our positions accurately?
Does my mark-to-market process accurately reflect the value of my
positions?
Are deals being entered properly and timely?
What is our confirmation process?
How will I know if our traders are trading within their limits?
How are position and credit limits established?
What is our exposure with counter-parties?

For the answers, download:
http://www.pmaconference.com/Derigen.pdf

************************************************************************

--------------------T O P S T O R I E S--------------------

Top Stories (January 29)

BUSH DIRECTS ENERGY PLAN
President Bush, voicing alarm that California's energy crisis is spilling
over its borders, directed Vice President Cheney and several Cabinet members
to develop a plan for the federal government to "act boldly and swiftly."
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/comtex/2
001/01/29/ao/0000-1444-power-woes-bush

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR FAVORS FINANCING INTEREST IN UTILITIES
Gov. Gray Davis on Friday threw his weight behind a controversial plan to
have the state provide financial relief to Southern California Edison and
Pacific Gas & Electric in return for partial ownership of the debt-wracked
utilities.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMAKRT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/knightri
dder/2001/01/29/krtbn/0000-0077-OC-POWER-CRISIS

PSEG, PANDA JV'S 1,000-MW TEXAS POWER PLANT ON LINE
A 1,000-megawatt power plant in Guadelupe, Texas has begun commercial
operations, its owners said Monday.
http://199.97.97.79/IMDS%PMADJN0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/djn/2001/
01/29/eng-djn/eng-djn_144057_46_3356754020788

EL PASO ENERGY COMPLETES MERGER WITH COASTAL, CREATING THE WORLD'S LEADING
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
El Paso Energy Corporation announced today that it completed its $24 billion
merger with The Coastal Corporation after the Federal Trade Commission
cleared the way by approving for public comment the consent agreement
governing the merger.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMANAT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/comtex/2
001/01/29/pr/0000-4866-.dstfront_05

-TENNESSEE OFFICIALS VIEW CALIFORNIA POWER CRISIS AS OPPORTUNITY FOR GROWTH
As the lights blink on and off in California, economic developers hope the
Golden State's electricity drought will draw manufacturers to power-plentiful
Tennessee.
http://199.97.97.163/IMDS%PMAKRT0%read%/home/content/users/imds/feeds/writersd
esk/2001/01/29/eng-powerm-000001/eng-powerm-000001_170658_145_178116061725

----------------------------------------------------------------------
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Access stories online at:
http://199.97.97.79/IMDS|PMADJN0,PMADJN1,PMADJN2,PMADJN3,PMADJN4|index

PG&E, Edison Up -3: Wts Would Cap Hldr Upside -Analyst

PRESS RELEASE: Green Mountain Power On Moody's Review-Up

Green Mountain Power Now On Moody's Review-Up Vs Down

PRESS RELEASE: Calif Stranded Bonds Not Affected: S&P

PSEG, Panda JV's 1,000-MW Texas Power Plant On Line

Calif Stranded Bonds Not Affected By Energy Crisis: S&P

PG&E, Edison Intl Up-2: Bankruptcy Threat Lower -Analyst

PG&E, Edison Intl Shrs Up On Calif. Lawmaker Plan >EIX

Cantabrico Says Bidding Process "Positive" >E.HIC

AES To Purchase Remaining 4.3% Of GenerChile For $59.7M

US Weather: Severe Storms Expected In South; Plains Snow

TXU Europe/Servista -2: Servista Sees 1H Germany Launch

RWE/Cantabrico -2: RWE Declines Comment On Counter-Bid

RTE/Awards/Contracts -3: Enron, Endesa, TXU, EDF Bid

RTE/Awards/Contracts -2: 1-Yr Allotments To Be Auctioned

RTE To Auction 850 MW Remainder In Annual Auction Feb. 12

RTE Awards 3-Yr Contracts For France-To-UK Elec Capacity

RTE Allocates A Total Of 650 MW To Two Companies

RWE Criticizes Hostile Bid For Cantabrico - Report

TXU Europe Unit In Servista.com Energy Supply Deal

FREE TRIAL: For a free trial of the Dow Jones Energy Service go to
www.dowjonesnews.com, and click "create account," or call
1-800-223-2274.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
N A T I O N A L
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Access stories online at: http://www.powermarketers.com/pma-nat.htm

Bush Sets Up Energy Task Force

California Continues Power Alerts

El Paso Energy Completes Merger with Coastal, Creating The World's Leading
Natural Gas Company

Enbridge, Ontario Power Generation And Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Help
Launch Major Environmental Initiative in Toronto, Peterborough And Mississauga

Management`S Discussions: 10-K, Massey Energy CO 2 of 3

Management`S Discussions: 10-K, Massey Energy CO 1 of 3

-Tennessee Officials View California Power Crisis as Opportunity for Growth

Sierra Pacific, Nevada Power Offer Emergency Plan to Assure Reliable,
Reasonably Priced Electricity for Nevadans

Penn Virginia Announces Additional Natural Gas Hedges for 2001

1000 Mw Guadalupe Power Plant Begins Commercial Operations; Plant Constructed
in under 18 Months

Hawaii's Largest Electric Utility Powers Up with Vignette; Hawaiian Electric
CO. Enables Customers to Manage Accounts Online with Vignette Technology

Santa Fe International Corporation to Present at Energy Conference

Bridge Update-Commodities: Energy Leads Markets Into Tailspin

Enterprise Acquires Interests in Natural Gas Pipelines

Environmental Excesses Have Us Starved for Power

El Paso Energy Announces New Board of Directors

Cypress Energy Inc. Enters Into Letter of Intent to Acquire Ranchero Energy
Inc.

Advisory/Resource: California Energy Crisis And Energy Alternatives; Grid
Survey Report Provides Overview of Alternative on-Site
Energy Sources, Implications of Deregulation

Remarks by the President at Energy Policy Meeting Jan. 29

Electrical Poker Game Begins

Parks Fueled by Green Energy

Online Auction Powers California Energy Recovery

Northwest Bailing Out Power Hogs

Emergency Power Systems

A Few Reminders About Power Factor Improvement

Forming a New Power

New York Could Experience California-Type Energy ShortagesIndustry Expert
Says Similar Policies Could Leave the State Short on Electricity

Repeats: Energy Volume And Open Interest Totals-Jan 29

Utility Companies Weather Winter Storms

Nem Adopts National Energy Technology Policy

Pemex Targets Major Increase in Natural Gas Production to Meet Soaring
Domestic Demand

Access Tool AIDS Seasonal Power Clean-Up

Mexico's Natural Gas Pricing Crisis: Will Confrontation Lead to Policy
Liberalization?

Jefferies Upgrades Reliant Energy to Buy from Accum (Rei)

Bush appoints task force on California crisis, broader energy issues

Mount Dakota/Sovereign Chief Ventures Letter of Intent Signed for Five Well
Natural Gas Project

New Carb Ruling on Electric Vehicles Boosts Stuart Energy's Hydrogen
Infrastructure Initiatives-- California Maintains Requirement for Automakers
to Sell Electric Vehicles by 2003 --

Processors Lament Unstable Power

Bush Directs Energy Plan

Energy Update/Los Angeles Department of Water And Power Issues Daily Energy
Update for Monday, Jan. 29, 2001

Energy Company Will Invest $6 Billion in Next Four Years

Clean Air Trust: Clean Air And Energy -- the Big Myth And the Reality

Effort to Recover Utility Fees Blocked

Sapient Energy Corp. to Pursue Strategic Alternatives

Northwest May Hire Firm to Help Rein in Energy Costs Low Temperatures And
High Gas Prices Put Strain on Budget; Firm Helped Other School Districts

American Power Conversion Integrates with Johnson Controls' Metasys(R)
Building Automation SystemFacility And Building Managers Can Now Control And
Proactively Manage Apc Symmetra(R) And Silcon(TM) Power Protection Systems
Via The Metasys Building Automation System

Enbridge Inc. Takes Steps to Minimize Impact of Rising Natural Gas Prices

Albertson's Expands Conservation Effort Power Use, Too Regulators Urge Other
Idaho Firms to Follow Example

President Extends Orders Ensuring Power to California Power Crunch

Plugging Green Power

Beacon Power's Flywheel Energy Technology Used by San Diego Gas & Electric

Convergent Group And Imedeon Form Strategic Alliance to Offer Wireless,
Web-Based Utility Business Solutions

Enermetrix Raises $35.5m in Private Equity; Company Geared to Fuel Growth And
Deliver New Solutions to Volatile Energy Markets

Telemetrix Begins Trials with City of Holland, MichiganTelemetrix Wireless
T3000 E-Telemetry Data(TM) System to Be Tested on City of Holland Electrical
Meters.

Lodestar Corporation Receives Approximately $29 Million Investment from
Ocm/Gfi Power Opportunities Fund, L.P.

Energy And Biotech Ipos on Tap

Energy Bills Climb Higher with User Tax / PG&E Customers Face Double Whammy

Seabrook Nuclear Power Station Selects Maximo(R)Maximo to Play Key Role in
Seabrook's World Class Performance Initiative

Feature/Home Grown? U.S. Consumers Show Increasing Interest in Generating
Their Own ElectricityNew National Consumer Survey Finds Higher Home Power
Use, Environmental Values & Desire for Independence; Threat of California
Blackouts May Be "Defining Moment" for New on-Site Power Generation Technologi

Calif. Remains under Power Alert

Higher Electric Bills Related to Cold Weather Snap

Power Plant Sparks a Border Battle Coweta Residents in Court Today Trying to
Stop Facility Being Built in Nearby Heard.

Letters: Look Into Facts About `Shortage' of Natural Gas

Natural Gas Companies Can't Handle Rash of Calls

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I N T E R N A T I O N A L
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Access stories online at: http://www.powermarketers.com/pma-intr.htm

DAVOS EU's de Palacio sees Russia energy link improving supply security

Minister: Hydro Concessions Freeze Lost US$1.5bn Investments - Peru

Generation Increases 4.1% in 2000 - Chile

Enersul to Develop 485.5mw in Small-scale Hydro - Brazil

OSC Re Equatorial Energy Exemptive Relief Applications

Erosion of A High-Carbon Steel in Coal And Bottom-Ash Slurries

World Energy Council Names New Chairman

Eastern Energy to Supply Servista

Top Energy Summaries - Monday, January 29, 2001 - 12:26 PM

Design Power, Inc. Announces New Customers for Front-End Plant Design Software

Tyco Electronics: Tyco Electronics Introduces New Highly Efficient And
Compact Line of 30w-40w Power Modules

Cambridge Energy Corporation Readied Development of Its Donner Field in
Southeastern Louisiana

Israel to Import Egypt's Natural Gas, Israeli Companies Protest

Top Energy Summaries - Monday, January 29, 2001 - 8:58 Am

Top Energy Summaries - Monday, January 29, 2001 - 7:46 Am

India quake knocks industrial wind out of prosperous Gujarat state

Ues of Russia to Invest in Primorye Coal Industry.

Japan's Kansai Electric to Supply Mitsubishi Heavy with LNG

----------------------------------------------------------------------
KRT DAILY ENERGY NEWS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Access stories online at http://www.powermarketers.com/pma-krt.htm

-Tennessee Officials View California Power Crisis as Opportunity for Growth

The Record, Stockton, Calif., Eric Grunder Column

California Commission Suspends Fines for `Interruptible' Power Usage

The Philadelphia Inquirer Andrew Cassel Column

California Governor Favors Financing Interest in Utilities

Plano, Texas, Official Pitches City's Energy Supply to California Firms

California Groups Seek to Assign Blame for Energy Crisis

Economists See Rate Hikes from California Utilities

Water Costs Trickle to Ontario, Calif.-Area Customers

Retired Corona, Calif., Power Exec Remains in High Demand

Opinion: Small Business Foots Bill for California Power Mistakes

The Business Press, Ontario, Calif., Inland Empire Focus Column

Belleville, Ill.-Area Small Businesses Raise Prices to Cover Natural Gas Bills

----------------------------------------------------------------------
REUTERS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Access stories online at: http://207.32.82.57/news/ElectricPower.html

Northern Alternative to buy 12 units from Pratt/Whitney

El Paso names board following Coastal approval

Enron claims first commodity data storage deal

Kharafi group wins $390mln Kuwait BOT sewage plant

W.House energy talks break no new ground on Calif.

Bush to spotlight faith-based groups, power crisis

UPDATE 1-California utility shares steady,trade slows

WRAPUP 1-Calif. under power alert as Bush meets advisers

El Paso Energy gets antitrust okay in Coastal deal

Enron considers developing Bahamas terminal - WSJ

Saudi Alujain plans $425 mln iso-octane project

El Paso says owed $50 mln by Calif. utilities

German RWE's Biblis A nuclear plant back on stream

California utility shares rise after upgrade

Duke, KeySpan propose Conn.-N.Y. gas pipeline

1,000-MW gas power plant begins operation in Texas

UPDATE 1-FERC orders Calif PX to enforce power cap

El Paso Q4 earnings jump with higher gas prices

FERC orders Calif PX to enforce power price cap

Canada spot natgas weakens on seasonal weather

UPDATE 1-El Paso earnings soar on unregulated-businesses boost

Taiwan anti-nuclear protester sets himself on fire

Indian nuclear power plant withstands quake

INTERVIEW-Spain's Rato says mulling giant power merger plan

US AES launches tender for rest of Chile Gener

PPL files shelf with SEC for $800 mln in debt, equity

AES fourth-quarter earnings rise sharply

RESEACH ALERT - PG&E, Edison International raised

*********************************************************
NEW on the POWERMARKETERS.COM TRAINING PAGE
*********************************************************
Access all online presentations at: http://www.pmaconference.com

New! Now you can choose to stream the presentation immediately over the web,
or download it to your computer for later viewing-- Free!

New! Five additional RealVideo-based powerpoint-based presentations, with the
accompanying audio. Running about 30 minutes each, the new selections include:

ELECTRONIC TRADING. Power is following natural gas to become an
electronically-traded commodity. The products, the technology and the future
of electricity transactions. Kevin Sluder, Vice President, HoustonStreet
Exchange.

NUTS AND BOLTS OF RETAILING. What it takes to put an energy retailing
operation together-- the cash and credit requirements, back office,
information technology, staffing, marketing, sales and organizational
considerations. Andrew Serri, Vice President, AmerenEnergy Marketing.

RETAIL: WHAT WENT WRONG, HOW TO FIX IT. Retail electric deregulation has thus
far been an underwhelming success, but a great deal has been learned, and it
is eminently fixable. By Dr. John O'Brien, Principal, Skipping Stone

MANAGING BILLING. The complex requirements for managing billing and
commodities in the deregulating energy industry cannot be met with current
CIS and CRM technology. Energy Retailers must embrace the next evolution of
energy customer management (ECM) solutions. Paul Grey, Chief Technology
Officer, Peace Software.

THE INTERNET AND THE VELOCITY FACTOR. Greater price transparency, faster
execution, reduced transaction costs, increased number and frequency of
transactions and increased specialization are just some of the changes to
energy markets wrought by the web, and it's just beginning. Implecations of
the internet for energy markets. E. Russell "Rusty" Braziel, Chairman and
Director, Altra Energy Technologies.

Access all online presentations at: http://www.pmaconference.com

****************************************
THE PowerMarketers.com ENERGYYELLOWPAGES
****************************************
http://www.energyyellowpages.net

Where to go when you're looking for:
Billing Systems, Brokers, Call Centers, Coal Marketers, Computers &
Networks, Conference Houses, Energy Management, Engineering Services,
Environmental Services, Exchanges & Clearing Houses, Executive Search
Services, Financial Services, Gas Marketers, Information Services, Internet
Services, Legal Services, Management Consulting , Marketing, Meters, Power
Marketers, Powerplant Development, Powerplant Equipment, Risk Management,
Sales, Software, Trade Associations, Training, Weather Services and more!
Check it out today! http://www.energyyellowpages.net/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
OTHER NEWS & INFORMATION FEATURES ON POWERMARKETERS.COM
----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS NEXT-DAY POWERTRAX ELECTRIC PRICE INDEX:
Access online at: http://www.powermarketers.com/p-trax.htm

ELECTRICITY SPOT PRICES:
Access online at: http://www2.dtnergy.com/pma/btu.plx

ELECTRICITY FUTURES PRICES:
Access online at: http://www.dtn.com/dtnonline/dtnergy/pma/pma.quotes.cfm

NATURAL GAS FUTURES PRICES:
Access online at: http://www.dtn.com/dtnonline/dtnergy/pma/pma.gas.quotes.cfm

THE PowerMarketers.com JobSite:
Access online at: http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm
A daily visit to "The PMA Jobs Site" at
http://www.powermarketers.com/pmajobs.htm connects you to a wealth of power
industry opportunities that could supercharge your career!
PMA ONLINE MAGAZINE: Access online at: http://www.retailenergy.com/pmamag.htm

News releases may be submitted to The PowerMarketers.com Power Report via
e-mail to news@powermarketers.com

Copyright 2000 by PowerMarketers.com: http://www.powermarketers.com/

The PowerMarketers.com Power Report is a complimentary service of The Power
Marketing Association. Headlines are copyrighted by their respective
services: Reuters, Knight-Ridder, and others.

Subscriptions to the PowerMarketers.com Power Report are free - you will
never be charged. You may redistribute this e-mail without change. You may
not redistribute stories. To register for a free subscription, point your
browser to: http://www.retailenergy.com/pma/dprreg.htm

TO UNSUBSCRIBE OR CHANGE your subscription, (1) point your browser to "The
PMA OnLine Power Report" subscription services form at
http://www.retailenergy.com/pma/dprreg.htm

OR

(2) , send a message to pma@powermarketers.com. Include "unsubscribe" in the
subject and include your name and email address for confirmation.


I know you are frustrated with the adherence to the VAR limits or lack there of, so I do not want to frustrate you more, but I would like you to consider the following suggestions.
	1)  It does not seem logical that the VAR limit between the Central, East and Texas Desk be so far apart.  Under the current limits the Central desk can have 			a position 2,000 Contracts larger than Texas and the East Desk 1,000 Contracts larger.
	2)  When looking at performance YTD I wonder if higher VAR limits only gives the desks a greater ability to double down to try and make up the YTD losses.
			VAR LIMITS		DESK P/L
	   EAST	 	$10 MILLION		($66.1) MILLION
	   CENTRAL	$12 MILLION		($13.9) MILLION
	   TEXAS	$8  MILLION		$55.8   MILLION
	3)  It also bothers me that everyone else does not hold the VAR limits in as high regard as Tom & I.  There are no consequences if the VAR limit is violated.  In fact 		in days like today you are rewarded for breaking the VAR limit. I feel that the following should be implemented in order to stress the importance of the VAR 		limit.
			The P/L for any desk exceeding the VAR Limit by more than $500,000 will be decreased each day by the amount they exceeded the VAR limit.
			(For example if a desks VAR limit is 10,000,000 and the VAR is $12,000,000 the P/L for the desk would be decreased by $2,000,000.  If the 				situation is not corrected by the next day the same procedure would be followed.)
		This method I believe makes for an even playing field.  Under the current procedures what I'm learning is if you ignore the VAR limits and you are right no 		one will remember at year end and you are rewarded for breaking the rules.

Please give me your thoughts when you have a chance.

	Thanks,  Jim


Mr. Lay,

I understand that we may not be having the holiday party.  I think this would be a huge mistake!  We have worked hard all year and recently haven't had much to celebrate.  I know alot of women (myself included) who have already bought their dresses.  I think this could be our Enron Swan Song and go out with a bang!

I think what you did about your bonus was the most unselfish thing a man in your position could do.  I have been honored to work for a man of your caliber.  I hope my next CEO can live up to your very high standards!

Regards,

Michelle
Michelle Hargrave
Global Resource Mgmt.
(713)853-6023
e-mail: michelle.hargrave@enron.com


FYI!  I reviewed the letter and it seems in line with the CPUC Decision.  Any
comments?

---------------------- Forwarded by Nancy Hetrick/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001
01:33 PM ---------------------------

Janet.Covington@sce.com on 02/12/2001 10:57:12 AM
To: dhuddles@enron.com, nhetrick@enron.com
cc: PAGANOMJ@sce.com, Espy.Brache@sce.com, Sheila.Advani@sce.com

Subject: Interruptible Letter

Attached is the letter we are sending regarding the Interruptible decision.
Please let me know right away if Enron will be sending on behalf of SCE.
Thanks

(See attached file: FINAL CUSTOMER LETTER ON CPUC DECISION.doc)

Janet L. Covington
Account Manager
ESP/AMS Services Division
SSID Administration Bldg., First Floor
7300 Fenwick Lane
Westminster, CA  92683
Phone: 714-895-0198 (54198)
Fax: 714-895-0347 (54347)
covingjl@sce.com
 - FINAL CUSTOMER LETTER ON CPUC DECISION.doc


I have received a note from UBS to say they have not received your employement application form.  Pls completed the attached form and return to me.   Please ensure the following:

1.	You put city and state in the school/college section
2.	You complete a 10 year history of work (if in College/not working/ etc  please state with dates).

Regards,

Karen Buckley
ECS 05845


sounds like just another night at  the QUENET ranch......


Sorry to those of you who can't receive pictures  that are inserted into the
text.
Randall Thomas Harman writes, "Spacer......I cannot open your files,
man....what is wrong??  I get unknown
file format.

Do I need to get a "Hi Tec" to help me in  wasting more of my day looking at
ol' Beta pics?"
So here the pictures are as attachments
 - Beta Hell Week.JPG
 - Beta Anderson.JPG
 - Beta Elton Rob.JPG
 - einstein_tongue.jpg
 - Beta House pre burn.JPG
 - President's Sail.JPG


Spoke to Carrie at the lawyer's office today.  Everything has been signed by Mary and Carrie will mail me the originals to sign.  I asked about a termination ont he $1500.00, Joal told Carrie that since we couldn't include it in this agreement since we didn't agree to it in the meeting with Mary.  IF Mary agrees, they will prepare and addendum to the original agreement.   I've learned a lot and the sooner we are through with this lawyer the happier I will be.  BE NICE NOW.


Teco Tap       29.167 / HPL IFERC

LS HPL LSK IC       40.000 / Enron


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001 09:27 AM -----

	Clint Freeland@ENRON
	01/16/2001 02:23 PM

		 To: "Barbour, David" <davidbarbour@akllp.com>, "Sullivan, Danny"
<dannysullivan@akllp.com>
		 cc: annmarie.tiller@enron.com, bill.bowes@enron.com,
brenda.l.funk@enron.com, brent.vasconcellos@enron.com,
clint.walden@enron.com, gareth.bahlmann@enron.com, tara.rafter@enron.com,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron/Project Cerberus

All -
Just wanted to let you know that Rabobank got their final approval today to
become the swap counterparty in the Cerberus financing.  We are moving
forward on the documentation with a target close of early next week (probably
Tuesday).

Issues that I am aware of that remain are:
1) For the tax folks, we need to assign EAH's interest in both Aeneas and
Psyche to either EES or EBS (an Enron operating subsidiary), then have that
entity contribute the Aeneas 0.01% economic interest to Psyche.  As I
understand it, this will provide the sale for tax purposes that Tammy needs
in order to spring the desired gain.  I am working with Mark Lindsay to
arrange for one of the Enron operating entities to take the A shares.  Danny
and David, please start putting the necessary assignment documents together
to facilitate this.  I'll give you the name of the Enron entity when I get it.

2) Due to certain things going on in the default swap market (which Rabo is
using as one of the factors in its pricing formula), we have agreed to pay
RBC an additional 10bp upfront and raise the spread on the deal to L + 85bp
from L + 75bp.  David and Danny, please make the necessary adjustments.

3) Rabo has requested that a couple of business points be changed.  Those are
that they would like to have an assignment over the A share of Aeneas, and
they would like the Sales Agency Agreement to be triggered upon and Enron
bankruptcy (if it occurs before maturity).  David, I agree with you that we
should not agree to these requests.  We must maintain control of the A share
in Aeneas since that is where the EOG stock is housed, and an Enron
bankruptcy should not trigger the SAA because Aeneas is a bankruptcy-remote
entity which should survive a bankruptcy of Enron.  Besides, requiring them
to wait until maturity of the deal to trigger the SAA was the business deal
we agreed to a long time ago.

If there are other issues that I have left out, please let me know.  I am in
Austin all week, but will be checking in periodically so send me either an
e:mail or a voicemail if you need me.  Talk to you soon.
CF


you might want to package a deal and move up to number 1 b/c if not you wont
get the player you want.  daddy has #1.


Form 144: Filing to Sell 24000 Shares of MPHASE TECH COM (XDSL)

********************************
WATCH A PRO TRADE IN REAL TIME

AmericaInvest.com chief technical analyst Harry Boxer
has averaged returns of 2.5% PER DAY in the last 30 days.

See what Harry's trading tick by tick in his real-time
'Technical Trading Diary.'  Beat the bear market with
with both long and short trading ideas.

Sign up for our FREE 15-day trial at
http://216.133.228.197/harry/harryorderpage2.asp?MID=50009

********************************

View complete article at: http://news.stockselector.com/newsarticle.asp?symbol=XDSL&article=21722401

MPHASE TECH INC  2.430

Jun 04, 2001 (Vickers Stock Research via COMTEX) --

<bs>Report Date: June 04, 2001

<bs>Filer: BETH MAYER INC
<bs>Relation:

<bs>Stock Name: MPHASE TECH COM
<bs>Stock CUSIP: 62472C102

<bs>Stock Symbol: XDSL
<bs>Exchange: OTC

<bs>Trade date: June 30, 2001
<bs>Shares for sale: 24000

Other Companies Involved:
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

To unsubscribe, please go to http://www.stockselector.com/modifyportfolio.asp?portnumber=1

? Copyright 1998-99, StockSelector.com


We are pleased to announce that Jim Noles, president and chief operating
officer of Enron Wind, will assume the additional role of chief executive
officer, effective immediately.  Jim will continue to be based in Houston.

Jim joined Enron Wind as its president in May of this year.  Prior to that
appointment, Jim was managing director for Enron's Operations Support Group
of Global Asset Operations and provided operations and maintenance oversight
and technical assistance to Enron's worldwide facilities.

Previously, Jim worked with Enron International's Asset Management team where
he formed the North American Asset Management Group to provide operation and
maintenance services to Enron North America's electricity generation peaker
plants that entered into service in 1999.  Jim joined Enron in 1995 as vice
president of Enron Development Corp. to head up its Middle East Regional
Development team.

Prior to joining Enron, Jim was an international marketer for TRW's Systems
Integration Group with responsibilities in the Middle East.  Jim served in
the U.S. Army for 25 years, culminating his career as a Brigadier General.
His education includes a bachelor's degree from the University of North
Alabama and a master's of public administration from the University of
Alabama.

Jim has a solid track record in development, sales, operations, and
leadership and has had a positive impact on Enron Wind's growth and
profitability in the short period since joining the company.  Please join us
in congratulating Jim on his promotion and new responsibilities.


How about a call today at 2?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)