Patrick, sorry for the short notice to try to catch up with you in L.A. this week.  As mentioned, I am responsible for the Gas Marketing efforts in the West. For a variety of reasons we have been slow in contacting you but I know that from a Trading perspective you have a strong relationship with our staff and were probably getting covered on most items you were needing.

My groups interests are around transportation, risk management, Strategic Assets, storage etc... .items that we believe are more of a term fit that real time position management issue.

We spend a lot of time on fundamentals, research, hedging strategies, load forecasting etc.

You had mentioned being in town in early November and if your schedule allows I would welcome the chance to get together.

Please contact me as you know your calendar and in the interim.... if I end up in the city prior to the end of the month, I may try to contact you then.

Thanks in advance.

Barry Tycholiz
Vice President
Enron North America


An update...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/19/2000 02:46
PM ---------------------------

michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com on 06/19/2000 02:04:19 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: karla.hesketh@us.abb.com, frank.chmiel@us.abb.com

Subject: LM 6000 Transformers

Kay,
Below are the prices as well as the ex-work factory dates (ship dates).  As
Ben
and Frank and I discussed last Friday this is what we need the option
extension
to the 30th of June to reflect.  Please give me a call when you can.  We need
to
get this done this PM if at all possible.  Frank and I will both be out of our
offices for the rest of the week and this will get very difficult.

Thanks

MIIKE
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael O
Sandridge/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB on 06/19/2000 01:58 PM
---------------------------

 (Embedded     Frank Chmiel/StLouis/USTRA/ABB
 image moved   06/16/2000 03:48 PM (Phone: +(314) 679-4702)
 to file:
 pic04072.pcx)

To:   Ben.jacoby@enron.com
cc:   Michael O Sandridge/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA, Karla
      Hesketh/Field_Marketing/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA, Dennis
      Bowman/StLouis/USTRA/ABB@ABB_USTRA
Subject:  LM 6000 Transformers

Ben,
     This note is based on the information provided to me earlier today by
Mike
Sandridge and confirms what the adjusted values would be for each tarnsformer
type, making the following conditions:

1-The quantity of transformers released under the agreement would be decreased
to 10.
2-The option payments for the ten production slots have been deducted, as
shown
below, along with the remaining net price / each transformer type.
3- Two of the $50,000 non-refundable optional production slot payments  are
cancelled. (LNL 9521-3 and 4)
4- In order to meet the terms of the latest agreement, the contract should be
signed by June 19,2000.  If that is not practical, at a minimum, the 10%
progress payment against the value of the contract would be due for wire
transfer immediately. That value would be 10% of $7,884,600 = $788,460.00.

     Therefore the Equipment Pricing Table is revised as shown below.

|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Table    | Primary        | ABB Neg.       | ABB Data Sheet |
| Item     | Voltage        | Number         | #              |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Quantity / Net Price ($) /     |
  | Each                           |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Item 1   | 138 to         | FC011400-2C    | HU-Enron-2C    |
| (3       | 13.8-13.8      |                |                |
| winding) | (64/85/106)MVA |                |                |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Two (2) @ $610,300.00          |
  |                                |
  | ($768,000-50,000-107,700 =     |
  | $610,300)                      |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Item 2   | 230 / 115 kV   | FC011400-1C    | HU-Enron-1C    |
| (3       | to             |                |                |
| winding) | 13.8-13.8 KV   |                |                |
|          | (64/85/106)MVA |                |                |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Six (6) @ $834,000.00          |
  |                                |
  | ($884,000-50,000 =             |
  | $834,000)                      |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
|          |                |                |                |
| Item 3   | 138 / 13.8 KV  | FC011400-2D-LS | HU-Enron-2D-LS |
| (2       | (84/112/140)   |                | (Low Sound)    |
| winding) |                |                |                |
|          |                |                |                |
|----------+----------------+----------------+---------------->
  >--------------------------------|
  |                                |
  | Two (2) @ $830,000.00          |
  |                                |
  | ($858,000+22,000-50,000=       |
  |  $830,000)                     |
  |                                |
  >--------------------------------|

     The ABB Performance data sheets that match up to the three designs that
will be shown in the contract are also attached herein.----------------------
(See attached file: TecFC011400_2C.doc)  (See attached file:
TecFC011400_1C.doc)
(See attached file: TecFC011400_2D_LS.doc)

The revised arrangement for schedules and trigger dates is as follows:
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   ABB   | Trigger  | Delivery  | Number |    MVA    |  High   | Comments  |
|  Item   | Date for |  Date Ex  |   of   |  Rating   |  Side   |           |
|   No.   |  Design  |  Factory  | Windin |           | Voltage |           |
|         |  Issues  |           |   gs   |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 11,  | Oct. 20,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 138 kV  |  City of  |
| 9521-1  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |         |  Austin   |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 11,  | Oct. 20,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 138 kV  |  City of  |
| 9521-2  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |         |  Austin   |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 29,  | Nov. 17,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-1  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 29,  | Nov. 17,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-2  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | May 29,  |  Dec. 1,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-3  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | June 19, |  Dec. 1,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-4  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|   LNL   | June 19, | Dec. 15,  | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-5  |   2000   |   2000    |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|     LNL |   June   | Dec.      | Three  | 64/85/106 | 115/230 |   Later   |
| 9517-6  | 19,      | 15,2000   |        |    MVA    |   kV    |           |
|         |   2000   |           |        |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
| LNL9518 | July 10, |  Aug. 1,  |  Two   | 84/112/14 | 138 kV  | Las Vegas |
|    -    |   2000   |   2001    |        |   0 MVA   |         |           |
|    1    |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
| LNL9518 | July 10, |  Aug. 1,  |  Two   | 84/112/14 | 138 kV  | Las Vegas |
|    -    |   2000   |   2001    |        |   0 MVA   |         |           |
|    2    |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|         |          |           |        |           |         |           |
|---------+----------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------|

Hope this covers the open issues .
     Regards,
     Frank Chmiel

 - pic04072.pcx
 - TecFC011400_2C.doc
 - TecFC011400_1C.doc
 - TecFC011400_2D_LS.doc


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Bob -

Consistent with your request, I have made some general revisions to the form
BETA.  These revisions revolve around the concept approved by Andy whereby
Enron is willing to allow the Broker to be absolved of responsibility for a
"busted" deal at such time as the Broker has provided Enron with the
verification of the Execution required under the agreement and Enron has yet
to obtain an actual confirmation (either in writing or by performance) from
the Participant/Counterparty.

I have modeled the provisions after the suggestions originally made by Amerex
and moved a few of the provisions around in order to accommodate the
changes.  If these changes are acceptable, I will then embark on preparing
amendment documents for the five current customers.  Since each of the BETA's
for these customers vary a bit from the base form, the amendment documents
will have to be customized to address each agreement independently.

Please take a look at the attached and let me know your thoughts.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Chris,

No problem. Feel free to mention our names.

Vince

Chris Strickland <chris_strickland@compuserve.com> on 01/28/2000 03:54:17 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, les <les_clewlow@compuserve.com>, Jules
<lacima@compuserve.com>
cc:
Subject: Energy Book

Hi Vince,

I have pulled a list of names together that I would like to send some
samples of our chapters of the book too, in the next couple of days,  in
order to try and get one or two sentence "reviews" for the dust jacket of
the book. I obviously won't say anything about Enron's sponsorship until it
is official sorted out, but is it OK if I indicate that yourself and Grant
are contributing material to the book?

I'm proposing to send 5 or 6 chapters to the following - unless you have
any objections or suggestions?

David Shimko
Ehud Ronn
Helyette Geman
Mark Garman
Dragana Pilipovic
Corwin Joy
Ilia Bouchouev
Alexander Edyleland
Steve Thomas

Hope the writing is going OK, and regards to Grant.

Best regards.

Chris


whats the name of the "priceline" type site that gives you an hour to buy the ticket.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001 10:02
AM ---------------------------

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 04/20/2001 09:59:38 AM
To: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: ENA/Blue Dog: conference call with Paul Hastings

When: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US &
Canada).

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please note that today's call has been rescheduled to 1:00 CST.  I told Paul
Hastings to dial in using the usual Sprint conference call number.

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Greg,
You're absolutely correct (obviously), and I actually noted that when I first
started sending that chart out. I did that so that they would be more in
scale and fit on the same chart. The chart is provided only to identify the
trend of our performance relative to the NYMEX. Perhaps I should note each
day that these volumes have been adjusted so as not to be misleading. Or, if
you wish, I could stop adjusting the numbers and just chart the absolute
values.
Please let me know which you would prefer.

Thank you,
Jennifer McQuade

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Whalley, Greg
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Mcquade, Jennifer
Subject: Re: FW: Crude 24X7 WTI Marketing Effort

your volume comparison chart is off by a factor of 10.  each contract is 1000
bbls.


I am requesting the following prepays to Reliant and Dominion for tomorrow.  All of these request are signed and on Doug's desk.

Prepay to Reliant for April Trunkline deal (sitara #1202698)   6,800 dth x 30 days x $3.44 per dth = $701,760.00

Prepay to Reliant for swing supply on Florida and Trunkline  $40,000.00

Prepay to Reliant for intraday backup supply in case Dominion does not perform under the contract
		10,000 dth x 2 days x $3.50 per dth = $70,000.00

Prepay to Dominion Oklahoma for April baseload activity 10,000 dth x 30 days x $2.1562 per dth = $646,860.00

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Mark Ellenberg" <Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:58 PM
To:	Mann, Kay
Cc:	Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Boyt, Eric
Subject:	RE: Dominion gas supply Tallahassee deal on Florida

i agree with kay's suggested approach.

if we are purchasing gas from another source at a higher price, i would put
dominion on notice that we are doing that and stating we will hold them
responsible.

Mark C. Ellenberg
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
1201 F Street, NW
Washington, DC  20004
202.862.2234

                    "Mann, Kay"
                    <Kay.Mann@ENR        To:     "Germany, Chris"
                    ON.com>              <Chris.Germany@ENRON.com>, "Boyt, Eric"
                    Office:              <Eric.Boyt@ENRON.com>, "Mark Ellenberg (E-mail)"
                                         <Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com>
                    03/27/02             cc:     "McMichael Jr., Ed"
                    01:47 PM             <Ed.McMichael@ENRON.com>
                                         Subject:     RE: Dominion gas supply Tallahassee
                                         deal on Florida

I've left a message for Dominion's counsel, telling him that we disagree
with their position that they can terminate the gas contract, and asking
him to educate us as to why they don't think that action is stayed.

We can follow up with a letter suggesting that we believe their termination
is wrongful, unless Mark disagrees.

Second issue is whether we should attempt to pay for the gas anyway, since
they have to deliver gas paid for prior to termination.

Kay

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         Germany, Chris
> Sent:         Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:14 AM
> To:           Germany, Chris; Boyt, Eric; Mann, Kay; Mark Ellenberg
(E-mail)
> Cc:           Parks, Joe; Concannon, Ruth; Polsky, Phil; McMichael Jr.,
Ed; Dhont, Margaret; Hamic, Priscilla
> Subject:           RE: Dominion gas supply Tallahassee deal on Florida
>
>
> The Tallahassee deal still has value so we want the Dominion deal to stay
in place.  I'm concerned about the 1st because all the money needs to be
wired tomorrow.  At this point, I believe Dominion should supply the gas
for April at the contract price regardless.
>
> Let me know where we stand with Dominion by 1:30 PM today.
>
> Thanks
>           -----Original Message-----
>          From:          Germany, Chris
>          Sent:          Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:04 AM
>          To:       Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Boyt, Eric; Mann,
Kay
>          Cc:       Parks, Joe; Concannon, Ruth; Polsky, Phil
>          Subject:       RE: Dominion gas supply Tallahassee deal on
Florida
>
>          The contract number assigned to this deal in Sitara is 96003121.
>          The contract number in Sitara for the Tallahassee deal is
96003663.
>
>                     -----Original Message-----
>                    From:          Germany, Chris
>                    Sent:          Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:01 AM
>                    To:       McMichael Jr., Ed; Boyt, Eric; Mann, Kay
>                    Cc:       Parks, Joe; Concannon, Ruth; Polsky, Phil
>                    Subject:       Dominion gas supply Tallahassee deal on
Florida
>
>                    Dominion Oklahoma Texas Exploration & Production, Inc
(successor to Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp) is supplying ENA 10,000 dth
per day at a Florida Zone 1.  This supply is matched up with ENA's sale to
The City of Tallahassee.  I believe both deals go through March 2013.  I
prepay Dominion for the supply each month.
>
>                    This morning, I had a voicemail from my contact at
Dominion, David Walker (405-749-5240).  His voicemail stated that Dominion
was terminating their contract with ENA and Dominion would not be supplying
any gas effective April 1, 2002.  Paul Vrana (713-752-4514) with Jackson
Walker is representing Dominion, he prepared the termination letter.
>
>                    Just spoke with Paul (10:55 AM) - he has not spoken
with anyone representing Enron but he has worked with Harlam Murphy?? in
the past.  He will fax a letter to me.
>
>                    Kay, I will leave a copy of the letter in your chair.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread41.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread41.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread41.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack41.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack41.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


This deal is in under Short Term California, not Long Term Northwest, and the
trader is Phil Platter, not Mike Swerzbin, and there is no broker. Are you
sure this is the deal in question?

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 11:35 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 297846

Kate, for deal 297846 (Mike Swerzbin) Prebon says the broker fee should be
$.0075 and we show no fee.

Please advise.

Thanks!!


John Neslage@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/02/2001 11:20 AM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: California ABX1-1

Ginger:

Could you please forward this to the participants of the daily California
Conference call?

Thanks

John
----- Forwarded by John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/02/2001 11:20 AM -----


Hello Michelle,

My name is Joelene Whittaker and I am a recruiter with STM Associates. DTE Energy, www.dtecs.com/sitemap.html, has retained us to assist them in placing two Director of Sales for Eastern and Western Regions. The Eastern position will be located in Ann Arbor, Michigan and the Western position in Denver, Colorado.  Both Director of Sales will report to the Vice President of Sales.

Qualifications of this position include a minimum of 5 years of sales experience and an additional minimum of 2 years experience with a trading company is preferred.  The successful candidate will have a strong understanding of U.S. Coal, Transportation and Electric Utility industries, including coal tolling, marketing and origination functions used in support of coal trading operations.  Solid experience in finding ways to capitalize on opportunities in the coal and transportation business is a must.  A background which includes Senior-level contract negotiations is required.

We are asking for recommendations from coal trading executives within the energy  industry.  Would you take a moment to consider colleagues whose experience fits DTE's profile and who you would deem as a high caliber candidate for the position.

I appreciate any help you may provide and look forward to hearing from you.  I can be reached at (801)531-6500 or via e-mail jwhittaker@stmassociates.com.

Regards,
Joelene Whittaker
STM Associates


http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************
Get a complimentary premiere SourceBook Weekly Issue at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
Not just news; analysis.
************************************************************************
Miss last week? Catch up on the latest analyses of the energy industry
at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssuesWatch
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, December 11, 2000
San Francisco Muni Attempt Poses Additional Challenge for PG&E
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

Backers of a plan to create a publicly owned power system in San Francisco
and Brisbane, Calif., got a financial boost recently with a panel approving
$754,250 in taxpayer money to study public power and related issues. Most
of the money will be used to study how the proposed municipality district
would work and how it would be financed. The Board of Supervisors Finance
Committee approved the spending, but put $400,000 of the money on reserve,
pending the selection of contractors to perform the study and determine
the scope of the work.

ANALYSIS: This news item circulated about two weeks ago, but it still deserves
attention as this could have tremendous impact on PG&E. The announcement
of the municipalization study comes at arguably the worst possible time
for PG&E as the utility already faces a multitude of financial and public
relations problems. Yet, in fact, the issue has been developing for several
months. Back in July, supporters of municipalization in PG&E's service
territory turned in a petition with 23,500 signatures calling for the creation
of a municipal utility district (meaning that electric service would be
provided by a city rather than an investor-owned utility).

First, let me provide some brief context regarding PG&E's current condition.
The utility is in debt of over $3 billion due to uncollected fees related
to the price spikes of last summer. PG&E's objective is to bill its customers
for this debt, and toward that end has petitioned to raise its rates with
the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).  Under PG&E's plan,
average residential monthly bills reportedly would increase from about
$54.50 to $63.50 on Jan. 1. Naturally, consumer activist groups such as
TURN that carefully monitor PG&E's every move have contested the rate
increase,
arguing that the utility alone is responsible for the debt it currently
faces. Since it is uncertain if the CPUC will grant PG&E's petition,
speculation
that the utility will become financially insolvent has begun to grow.

Both San Francisco and the smaller city of Brisbane to the south are included
in the study because municipalization must include two separate cities
in order to take effect. If municipalization is ultimately approved, these
two cities would form a new district and elect directors who would then
attempt to purchase PG&E's power grid in the area.

Proponents of the muni bypass effort say that the cities can provide less
expensive power to customers than PG&E, as the utility must pay dividends
to stockholders and compensate well-paid executives. PG&E has already started
damage control in response to the study, arguing against the formation
of a municipal utilities district. First, the utility has said simply that
it is not for sale, but more importantly it is PG&E's contention that
customers
would not necessarily save money if the cities in question were to
municipalize
their electric districts. In addition, PG&E says the cost for the cities
to buy its assets*necessary power plants, utility lines and other
infrastructure*would
run about $1 billion, which in fact would make the project more expensive
in the long run for customers.

Consumer activist Harvey Rosenfield is spearheading the municipalization
effort and is using the problems in San Diego as a means to support his
case. His name may sound familiar, as Rosenfield has been involved in many
seemingly anti-investor owned utility (IOU) measures in California. Back
in 1998, Rosenfield led the fight for Proposition 9, which would have
essentially
put a screeching halt on deregulation in the state. Although Prop. 9 was
ultimately defeated at the ballot, had it passed the measure would have
stopped the three California IOUs from charging customers for the costs
associated with $6 billion in bonds they had sold to pay for the 10-percent
rate cut that customers began receiving in January 1998. Prop. 9 would
have blocked the utilities from recouping any of their stranded costs,
which of course SDG&E has now accomplished and reportedly the other IOUs
(SCE and PG&E) are close to doing so as well. Rosenfield was a key participant
in Californians Against Utility Taxes (CUT), which lobbied repeatedly for
electric rates to be reduced by 20 percent for small consumers (as opposed
to the 10 percent that was included in the state's restructuring bill).

Along with this study related to specific cities, there reportedly is a
simultaneous movement from Governor Gray Davis for a state takeover of
the power transmission grid, power plants and government-sponsored
construction
of new generating plants. In early December, an internal memo was leaked
indicating that the governor was considering these measures as a response
to the tight supplies and high prices seen in San Diego last summer. Included
in the plan would be a restructuring of the state's power system wherein
the grid of transmission lines and power plants would be placed under state
control. Among several points on which PG&E and the governor disagree,
Davis has proposed an extended rate freeze for customers of all of the
three state's IOUs. While PG&E is pushing for a rate increase, California's
highest official reportedly would implement an indefinite rate freeze that
would further complicate PG&E's plan to pull itself out of debt.

Municipalization attempts in cities across the United States have increased
over the last two decades. Just last week, the city of Hermiston, Ore.,
was granted the right to acquire, by condemnation, the distribution facilities
that Pacific Power uses to serve parts of the municipality. The Umatilla
County Circuit Court has upheld the city of Hermiston's right to acquire,
by condemnation, the distribution facilities Pacific Power uses to serve
parts of the municipality. The city has been trying to acquire those
facilities
since 1998, with the intent of forming its own utility to serve the 4,000
commercial and residential customers now served by Pacific Power. Of course,
even though this is a significant ruling, it will remain embroiled in court
for some time. A jury trial to set the dollar amount of compensation for
Pacific Power's facilities won't start until March 12, 2001. Other
well-publicized
municipalization attempts have taken place in Lakewood, N.Y. (failed) and
a number of cities across Florida.

However, despite the rise in muni bypass efforts, the fact remains that
no contested municipalization effort of any significant size has been
successful
since the one that occurred in Massena, N.Y. back in 1982. At that time,
the city of Massena offered low-cost hydropower and tax-free financing,
which made the municipalization attempt beneficial to citizens. Today,
cities rarely can offer such advantages, which had made it difficult for
muni bypass efforts to succeed. Statistics show that, when given the option
to develop a city-run electric system by dissolving the incumbent utility's
authority, citizens across the country have chosen to retain the IOU model.
Of course, arguments could be made that in such cases the IOU lobbying
force has been a formidable component, wielding the capital necessary to
wage a successful campaign to protect its business. Yet, at the same time,
a case can be made that the benefits of municipalization just have not
been proven and that explains why citizens generally have opted to retain
the IOU model.

There is both good and bad news for PG&E related to this particular study.
The bad news is that studies such as these most often recommend
municipalization,
which makes it very difficult for local politicians to resist a takeover.
In other words, because the wheels have started turning toward
municipalization
in the area, it is more than likely that PG&E will have to engage in a
battle to preserve its business. Even though past history shows the attempt
probably would not be successful if PG&E contests it, the bypass effort
would result in PG&E spending a lot of money and time to fight the effort.

The good news is that time is on the utility's side. Municipalization is
usually a long and involved process. The fact that the Finance Committee
gave the green light to proceed with the study is only the first in many
regulatory checkpoints. The next steps are the full board's consideration
of the funding request for the study, and subsequently a decision whether
or not to put municipalization on the local ballot. Then the hard campaigning
would begin to sway public opinion one way or the other. Thus, even if
muncipalization of the two cities were to occur, PG&E still has some time
to potentially resolve its debt situation and construct a strong opposition
to the muni attempt.

However, from a public relations standpoint, this is just the last thing
that PG&E needs at this point. The utility continues to spin media coverage
to convey that it is only trying to recoup a debt that it accrued on behalf
of its obligation to serve customers. Adversaries such as TURN and Harvey
Rosenfield, however, are just as aggressively working to convince the public
that PG&E is trying to unfairly stick customers with a $3 billion tab.
To now have discussions emerge about whether or not city government could
more effectively provide electric service is another fire that PG&E will
have to extinguish if it wants to remain operational.
===============================================================
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert and SourceBook Weekly should
be sent to wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

*********************************************************************
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
at nspring@scientech.com or (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are
also available on our website.
*********************************************************************

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and type "delete" in the subject line.


I haven't sent it yet.


Hi all,

I just moved back to Portland and may have missed some of the messages, but
i know that OES was a proposed practice area.  You can't get much better
than those fields.  Also, Bridlemile School/Hamilton Park is not far from
OES and is in good shape.

Cheers,
Mike

>From: Jon.Gail@hcs.state.or.us
>To: Jon_Bloomfield@rsausa.com, aevanloon@hotmail.com,
>bill.williams.iii@enron.com, bvargo@koin.com, greenroom@attglobal.net,
>greenroom@attglobal.net, jacobf@hapdx.org, pws-fab1@siltronic.com,
>kwitcosky@portlanddev.org, kmurray@responsys.com, neill@pcez.com,
>zottermj@hotmail.com, rhalstead@pdx.edu, Tim.canfield@nike.com,
>turnstone@onemain.com, CPTHoff@NMHG.com, Tristan.Brunin@yoshida.com,
>JWilliamson@BAUGHPDX.COM, turnston@teleport.com, mstibolt@acg-pdx.com,
>MRBndaHAUS@aol.com, kevin_mcdowe11@yahoo.com, mackayje@yahoo.com
>Subject: The Green Room
>Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:09:04 -0700
>
>Green Roomies,
>
>We are registered for fall outdoor soccer in the 1st division. In first
>division we'll have our work cut out for us but I think we'll do fine and
>have fun.  The first game is Sept. 9th at 12:00 with 9 more games each week
>thereafter.   I do not know the locations yet but will get that out as soon
>as I do.  Many have suggested the need to practice to be competitive in the
>1st division so we need to set a practice schedule.  How do Tuesday and
>Thursday nights look for you guys?  We also need a field we can count
>on....Ideas anyone?  In the meantime we all need to be keeping our fitness
>in mind...running twice a week 4-6 miles would be a good start.  If we can
>hit the fall season in good shape and well organized I am sure we'll be a
>very competitive 1st division team.  I have been paid by Mike Z., Kevin,
>Adam, Scott, Jon B., Mike B., Jay, Justin, Declan, Tristan, and Jacob.  The
>rest of you still need to mail $50 to Jon Gail 8573 SW Dakota Drive,
>Tualatin OR 97062 if you want to play.  Again please send me your
>suggestions regarding practice fields and let me know if you have any
>questions.  Later,
>
>Jon Gail, Manager
>503-691-8067

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Yes, with a temporary change for this week only!  The Leadership call will
take place Friday, May 18 at 4:30 PM instead of Thursday, May 17 at 4:30 PM.

gngr
713-853-7751

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	05/16/2001 03:37 PM

		 To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject:

Apologies, but I'm trying to make sure that I have the meeting times right.

Monday 10:30 AM CDT--"All hands" meeting with business folks.
Monday 3 PM CDT--Washington Call
Tuesday/Thursday 1:30 PM CDT--California Call
Thursday 4 PM CDT--Leadership call

Do I have these right?

Thanks a million.

Best,
Jeff


thanks

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FYI

i left a message with your name and number.  If I get any other call I will
refer them to you.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/23/2001 07:47 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	07/23/2001 07:46 PM

		 To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Tim
Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Richter/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen
Swain/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Susan
J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Harry
Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristin
Walsh/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Update - 7.23.01

Quick update to Jim's note:

Still appears that the Assembly only has enough left in it tonite to deal
with the budget and then recess; and it is still unclear if they'll get
enough Republicans to go along tonite, or be forced to come back tomorrow to
try again.
If the Legislature does get the budget done and recesses without addressing
the energy issues, then decision-making on some key issues---Direct Access in
particular---will fall back in the PUC's lap. (The Legislature is scheduled
to be out until August 20th.)
The PUC has scheduled a vote on whether to suspend DA, the rate agreement
with DWR, DWR's rev. req. and other issues on August 23rd.
PUC President Loretta Lynch has said that she wants to issue a proposed
decision on these issues sometime between now and the first week of August.
As Jim points out, we continue to try to hammer out favorable outcomes for
Direct Access and cost allocation in both forums----the Legislature and the
PUC.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/23/2001 07:31 PM -----

	James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/23/2001 02:15 PM

		 To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Tim
Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Richter/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen
Swain/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Update - 7.23.01

The attached note is from Enron's hired lobbyist in Sacramento.  Looks like
the only thing that is going to happen will be a Budget without anything on
energy restructuring (could continue to change).

There will be some additional negotiating on SBX2 78 over the recess.  Enron
is looking for a way into those discussions (Jeff Dasovich).  We will try to
push good language on DA dates and assignment of Utility and CDWR costs.

On another note, CDWR has announced its revenue requirements going forward.
The numbers are significantly less than had previously been expected (due to
lower costs for spot market purchases).  The end result, if their figures are
correct, is that the March 27 3c/kwh increase would be sufficient going
forward (we are trying to validate).  The key is that now the Retained
Generation proceedings will determine if any more $ is needed from retail
customers.

Thanks,

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Scott+20Govenar+22+20+3Csgovenar+40govadv+2Ecom+3E+40ENR
ON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:55 PM
To: Sharma, Ban; Leboe, David; Eric Letke; Thome, Jennifer; Ken Smith; Bev
Hansen; Hedy Govenar; Buster, Miyung; Guerrero, Janel; Robert Frank; Mike
Day; Lawner, Leslie; Kingerski, Harry; Karen Denne; Kean, Steven J.; Alan
Comnes; Susan J Mara; Kaufman, Paul; Jeff Dasovich; Steffes, James D.; Rick
Shapiro
Subject: MOU UPDATE

For those of you who don't already know, the Senate passed its version of
the SCE MOU, SBX2 78 (Polanco/Sher) which requires users over 500 kw to foot
the bill for SCE's entire undercollection and it eliminates DA completely.
This largely represents TURN's proposal.  The Senate also passed a budget
and has since adjourned until August 20.

The Assembly had been considering two MOUs, ABX 82 (Keeley) and ABX 50
(Wright).  Both bills had difficulty attracting a majority of votes given
their different approaches to dealing with SCE.  ABX 82 for example, had
large users picking up most of the tab for SCE's undercollection whereas ABX
50 split those charges among all users.  Both bills provided for some type
of direct access and ABX 82 also provided for a purchase of the transmission
system.  In light of the difficulty in passing either bill, it appears as if
the Assembly will shelve both proposals today in order to amend SBX 78 over
the summer break.  An internal legislative working group may be formed to
draft amendments but this has not been confirmed.  Large users have begun
drafting extensive amendments recognizing that in its current form SBX 78
has very little to offer.

The Assembly will try to pass the final portion of the budget today and
recess until August 20.


I believe this message was intended for Susan M Scott of ENA; I'm with ETS
Legal.

	From:  Russell Dyk                           12/08/2000 09:36 AM

To: Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Super Saturday Dinner

Apparently they now have more people than they know what to do with, so none
of us are needed. Thanks anyway, Susan, for offering to fill in and, Sheetal,
for extraordinary networking.


missing deal for apb

dianna

buy dynegy
94.00
25 mw
10-30
mid c
on peak


What's the delivery point on those deals?

Stephanie Piwetz   01/11/2001 10:48 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Powerez Deal from 1/8/01

Kate,
Pwx called this mroning to verbal a deal that  was sleeved with EES.  I do
not see it in system, although I see the deal on EES spreadsheet that I
receive daily.
the deal is Enron Buys Pwx   Q4 2001 25mws   255.00  done direct  trade date
1/8/01  Matt Motley trader
then Enron Sell EES  Q4 2001  25mws   $255.05

Should this be in the system and if so do you have deal numbers on the
above.  I believe we sleeved the deal for EES and Pwx.
Contact at EES, Judy (backoffice 7138535490)  Jubran Whalen is EES trader.

Thanks


If your do not see our email in 15 seconds, please go to http://www.enerfaxdaily.com to today's gas & power prices & news.

If your email does not support this web
version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com
Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by
clicking http://www.enerfax.com

Delete kwatson@enron.com  by forwarding to web@enerfax.com or send a blank email to
leave-enerfaxdaily-1012742E@relay.netatlantic.com


Per your request.  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001 04:34 PM -----

	Julia Murray
	04/12/2001 06:37 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Topics for General Counsel Meeting

Mark   Attached is a memo to Jim Derrick suggesting topics for discussion at
the upcoming General Counsel meeting in May.   Please either give me your
comments and I will send or you can forward on to Jim.  Thanks.  Julia

Julia Heintz Murray
Enron Wholesale Services
Enron Industrial Markets LLC
1400 Smith Street, EB3838
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-4794
Fax:  (713) 646-3393
julia.murray@enron.com


Steve:
 that works for me.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	steven.kessler@db.com
	06/22/2000 08:02 AM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: My Schedule

How about 3:00 your time, 4:00 NY time?  It should be quick.

Steve

Original Message from Carol.St.Clair@enron.com @ HUB on 06/21:

Steve:
I am free anytime after 2 tomorrow afternoon.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Mr. Kaminski,

It was a pleasure and honor to have lunch with you. I also enjoyed your
presentation in our graduate class.  I hope you enjoyed your visit to
Baton Rouge. Come back to visit us sometime!!

Attached is my resume as you suggested.  Thank you for your interest in
LSU and me.

Sincerely,
Datren L. Williams

 - RESUME.doc


Thanks for your help with solving this discrepancy, we finally got CPS to agree with our numbers.

Thanks again,
MJ

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillips, George
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:30 PM
To: Forney, John M.; Capasso, Joe
Cc: Jacobson, Michael
Subject: RE: Constellation Dispute

Deal number 815970 was a sale to Constellation as follows:

25 MWs
$17
Traders name:  Tyler
HE 23
South Zone

Please leave me a message if I can answer any other questions.

John/Joe - I am not certain of Michael Jacobson's e-mail address from home- could please forward this message.

-----Original Message-----
From: Forney, John M.
Sent: Mon 11/5/2001 3:14 PM
To: Phillips, George; Capasso, Joe
Cc:
Subject: FW: Constellation Dispute

Can you guys check this out?  Constellation is an important counterparty and we want to get them an answer pretty soon.   Im sure you guys are correct,  but if you can provide  some detail about their trader name,  etc.  that would be helpful.

Thanks

JMF
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Jacobson, Michael
Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 2:57 PM
To:     Forney, John M.
Subject:        RE: Constellation Dispute

The deal number is 815970.1 - under your name but I think that it is Eric's.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Forney, John M.
Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 2:24 PM
To:     Jacobson, Michael
Subject:        RE: Constellation Dispute

sure,  who is the trader listed on the deal?

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Jacobson, Michael
Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 2:19 PM
To:     Forney, John M.
Cc:     Grace, Rebecca M.
Subject:        Constellation Dispute

JMF,

Constellation is disputing this sale we show to them in EnPower as well as the Hourly P&L.  I have nothing to give them for support, can you help me out or at least pass this along to whomever did the deal?

10/11/01 HE 23 50 mw @ $17

Thanks,
MJ


<title>WineISIT.com - Member E-mail</title>

Store
Member:
Spec's Wines, Spirits & Finer Foods

Members > E-mail
<map name='weekly link'>
<area alt='' coords='24, 9, 327, 28' href='http://www.wineisit.com/ad/2001November/weekly/20011119/spec.html' shape='RECT'>
</map>

Hi WARREN P,

Spec's Wines, Spirits & Finer Foods and WineISIT.com have teamed up to offer you some great savings on your favorite wines and spirits.

We hope you enjoy these WineISIT.com specials.

5% discount is available for those not using credit cards. Use of debit cards
earns the 5% cash discount.

Both regular and cash discount prices are listed. Specials available at all
locations.

E-mail any questions or comments about these special offers to:

sales@specsonline.com

Spec's largest and most famous location is at 2400 Smith St. on the south edge of
downtown. 16 other locations are around Houston.

Spec's is famous for providing customers more wine, liquor, beer and specialty foods and at lower prices than anyone in Texas.

Store Hours:

All stores are open from

10AM to 9PM Monday
through Saturday.

Charge Cards Honored:

American Express, Mastercard, Visa, Discover cards.

To arrange delivery, call order department at 713-526-8787 OR TOLL FREE 888-526-8787

Spec's, for the good stuff.

Spec's is not responsible for mis-prints or typographical errors. All customers must be at least 21 years old.

Monthly Specials:
November, 2001
Valid 11/5 thru 12/1

J.W. Dundee's Honey Brown Lager 12 pack

America's first and finest honey lager, J.W. Dundee's Honey Brown Lager is brewed with pure Canadian clover honey. This delicious beer offers a smooth, full-bodied taste with just a touch of sweetness.

2000 World Beer Cup - Award Winner and 2001 American Tasting Competition - Award Winner.

"Wrap yourself around your Honey!"

Cash Price: $8.69     Regular Price: $9.15

Rancho Zabaco Sonoma Heritage Vines Zinfandel
750 ml.

One of the outstanding brands being produced at the Gallo of Sonoma winery, created to showcase the bold, intense varietals of the best Sonoma areas. They're best known for their Zinfandels, and this one captures the essence of the grape's character-lush berry fruit flavors and moderate tannins. It's great for everyday drinking.

Cash Price: $8.40     Regular Price: $8.85

Torresella Pinot Grigio 750 ml.

Aromas of fresh fruit, apple and melon; crisp and clean flavors; dry and beautifully balanced. An excellent complement to soups, antipasti, prosciutto, melon and light fish and pastas.

Cash Price: $6.10     Regular Price: $6.43

Turning Leaf Vineyards Chardonnay 750 ml.

As Turning Leaf wines are handcrafted for perfection, a majority of the grapes for Turning Leaf were selected from some of the finest vineyards in the Lodi region. A major winegrape-growing region since the 1850s, Lodi is increasingly looked to by leading California wineries for grapes of superior quality. The warm days and cool nights of its Mediterranean climate allow the grapes to develop excellent color and maintain crisp acid levels through to harvest. The end result is a well-balanced fruit-forward Chardonnay with excellent varietal character.

Cash Price: $5.97     Regular Price: $6.29

Tosti Asti 750 ml.

Tosti was founded in 1820 and is located in Canelli, Italy in the heart of the Asti region. Produced from the Moscato grape, it has a pale straw color with golden highlights. The sparkle is soft, lively with a delicate, aromatic nose and a trace of pear and fruit with a sweet flavor.

Enjoy Tosti Asti whenever you feel
like enjoying a great glass of wine.

Cash Price: $7.62     Regular Price: $8.03

Gallo of Sonoma Merlot 750ml.

A smooth, full-bodied wine with
pleasant berry aromas, and an
excellent balance between ripe fruit
flavors and structured tannins.

Cash Price: $9.55     Regular Price: $10.06

Alice White Chardonnay 750 ml.

Since its introduction in 1996, millions of Americans have embraced the bold yet approachable Australian wines of Alice White, consistent Wine Spectator "Best Buy" selections that reflect the courage of the young adventurer herself. Join Alice in her journeys-and explore the finest in New World winemaking.

Cash Price: $5.56     Regular Price: $5.86

Gallo of Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon 750 ml.

This Cabernet is rich and complex with concentrated flavors of black cherries, currant, and spice. Exhibits excellent structure and appealing depth, accentuated by extended aging in American and French oak barrels. As a result, the wine has ample body and an abundance of fruit character.

Cash Price: $10.35     Regular Price: $10.90

Baron Herzog Cabernet Sauvignon 750 ml.

Baron Herzog wines are produced in Santa Maria, California by former J. Lohr winemaker Peter Stern in cooperation with Royal Wine Corporation, the leading distributor of kosher wines in the world. Baron Herzog Cabernet Sauvignon is a full-bodied rich wine of unmistakable depth and elegance.

Cash Price: $10.29     Regular Price: $10.84

Baron Herzog Chardonnay
750 ml.

Baron Herzog wines are produced in Santa Maria, California by former J. Lohr winemaker Peter Stern in cooperation with Royal Wine Corporation, the leading distributor of kosher wines in the world. Baron Herzog Chardonnay is a luscious wine with distinct flavors and noble character.

Cash Price: $10.29     Regular Price: $10.84

Lockwood Vineyard 1998 Chardonnay 750 ml.

The Lockwood Vineyard 1998 chardonnay reflects meticulous care in the vineyards, innovation in the winery and a passion for excellence in handcrafted wines. Its tropical aromas are accented with French oak nuances. The flavors and textures are full but display balanced acidity. It's a perfect companion to a diversity of cuisines.

Cash Price: $9.15     Regular Price: $9.64

Baron Herzog Merlot 750 ml.

Baron Herzog wines are produced in Santa Maria, California by former J. Lohr winemaker Peter Stern in cooperation with Royal Wine Corporation, the leading distributor of kosher wines in the world. Their Merlot is charming and well balanced, with a bursting bouquet and full flavorful finish.

Cash Price: $10.29     Regular Price: $10.84

Turning Leaf Vineyards Merlot 750 ml.

Produced in the moderate climate of California's Central Valley, this wine was aged in oak for an average of six months to meld the ripe fruit flavors of Merlot into a soft-textured mouthfeel. Medium bodied, with rich, fruity aromas and flavors enhanced by subtle undertones of oak. Pleasing notes of ripe fruit and plum deliver a full, soft mouthfeel and a lingering finish.

Cash Price: $5.97     Regular Price: $6.29

Saint Brendan's Irish Cream Liqueur 34? 750 ml.

Saint Brendan's Irish Cream Liqueur is unique in that it is the only Irish Cream Liqueur made by a dairy company. Its delicious, smooth blend of premium, triple-distilled, aged Irish Whiskey and the company's own best dairy cream ensures the ultimate freshness and creamy texture. Saint Brendan's uses only top quality, all-natural ingredients for an exceptionally rich, smooth and creamy flavor.

Cash Price: $10.44     Regular Price: $10.99

Cavit Pinot Grigio 1.5L

It's all about taste. Start a tradition this summers with Cavit, America's #1 Pinot Grigio and #1 Imported Wine*. Crisp, light with appealing flavors, Cavit Pinot Grigio was awarded a 4-Star rating from the New York Times Wine Today website. A perfect companion to your favorite summer dishes. Enjoy chilled.

*Cavit Pinot Grigio ACNielsen 52 weeks 3/31/01 FDL"

Cash Price: $7.25     Regular Price: $7.64

E&J VSOP Brandy
80? 750 ml.

" . . . richly bodied and rewardingly flavored high impact blend that gives the dual pleasures of complex oak aged flavors and lingering body. Powerful bouquet of vanilla and old sherry are demonstrated here which can only be gained by long aging. Supple flavors of cedar and berries finish with a long and satisfying smoothness that defines this blend."
Gregory Hill, Brandymaster

Cash Price: $8.28     Regular Price: $8.72

Cricklewood Pinot Gris 750 ml.

With loads of apple and pear flavors, this crisp white is beautifully balanced with a spicy, refreshing finish. The Cricklewood varietals are produced by Montonore Vineyards from its estate vineyards in the Northern Willamette Valley of Oregon.

Cash Price: $8.57     Regular Price: $9.03

Cricklewood Pinot Noir 750 ml.

This lovely, easy drinking red offers lots of red and black cherry with light earth and chocolate notes with a velvety texture and finish. The Cricklewood varietals are produced by Montonore Vineyards from its estate vineyards in the Northern Willamette Valley of Oregon.

Cash Price: $8.57     Regular Price: $9.03

E & J Brandy 80? 1.75 L.

" ...distilled and aged to demonstrate
finesse and delicacy of California
brandy... loads of fruit and varietal
grape flavors dominate, with a light
balance of butterscotch and vanilla
notes recovered from carefully
selected barrels used in aging . . .
lightly bodied with a crisp clean
finish."

Gregory Hill, Brandymaster

Cash Price: $15.44     Regular Price: $16.26

Moskovskaya Vodka
80? 1 L.

From Moscow's famous Cristall Distillery, makers of Stolichnaya and known worldwide for exceptional quality, this is the top-selling vodka in Russia. Virtually identical to Stoli (except the label is green, not red) at a bargain price!

Cash Price: $12.99     Regular Price: $13.68

WineISIT.com Member E-mail is a special service for WineISIT.com members. If you wish to unsubscribe to this E-mail, simply click here and update your preferences on our E-mail preferences page.  We'll remove you from our member E-mail list as quickly as possible.


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Status:		completed

Task Priority:		2
Task Due On:		5/17/2001
Task Start Date:	5/16/2001


<<BILASALT.DOC>>

Here is the draft letter for the direct access coalition to send to Bilas on
Friday.  It must be made into a formal letter with a service certificate.
So... Scott can you distribute it to the full direct access coalition and
ask them to directly reply to me if they want to be added to the letter we
send or do they want to send their own comments?  We would like a response
by Thursday noon.

Comments by Enron personnel can be sent to me directly as well.

Thanks, Mike Day

 - BILASALT.DOC


Hi, Paul:

Since I have sent you a list of the master netting agreements we have signed here, will you send me a list of the master netting agreements ECTRIC and others have signed on your end?

Thanks!

Marie


Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <adamsholly@netscape.net>
To: duluth1@yahoo.com, margy2001@yahoo.com, LDonoho@enron.com, wtaylor@creighton.edu, jpatter@creighton.edu
Date: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:50:13 GMT
Subject:

--

__________________________________________________________________
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/


Francis - It is extremely important that I meet with you tomorrow to discuss
some changes that need to be made to this report ASAP.  Please let me know
when you are free to meet.

Thanks,
Susan
x3-1242


We have received an executed financial Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   July 31, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Allied Waste North America, Inc.

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Foreign Exchange

Confirming Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Choice of Law:   New York

Copies will be distributed.

Stephanie Panus


my 2 and 11

Phillip M Love
08/15/2000 10:26 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: your 2nd round pick

your second and third


Can you please set this new location up, Nipsco/NGPL, with curves the same as
the original point, NGPL/Nipsco.  I believe they are as follows: gas daily
should be GDP-CHI. GATE, the intramonth should be NGI/CHI. GATE, and the Mid
should be NGI/CHI./NIPSCO.

Please shout with any questions.  Thanks for your help.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
09:00 AM ---------------------------

	From:  George F Smith                           01/23/2001 08:08 AM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cora Pendergrass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Margie Straight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Williams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NGPL Nipsco

Phillip, Please move the following two deals from their current location,
NGPL/Nipsco, to a new location Nipsco/NGPL.  We are setting up Nipsco as it's
own pipeline so as to better track positions. Please make the change
effective Feb. 1.

Thanks, George


Mark,

Is this still of interest?

David Yeres

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Yeres, David (Financial Products-NY)
> Sent:	Tuesday, June 26, 2001 2:45 PM
> To:	'mark.taylor@enron.com'
> Subject:	FW: Proposed Audit Presentation
>
>
> Mark,
>
> Further to mine of June 8th, do you think there is any continuing interest
> in your shop for the contract audit matter we discussed?  By the way, was
> Enron's building spared in the recent floods that we read about?
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Yeres, David (Financial Products-NY)
> Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 12:19 PM
> To:	'mark.taylor@enron.com'
> Subject:	Proposed Audit Presentation
>
>
>
>
> Mark,
>
> I haven't heard back on scheduling the contract audit presentation. Is
> this on the back burner or have you decided not to proceed at this time?
>
> David Yeres
> Clifford Chance Rogers & Wells
> 200 Park Avenue
> New York, NY 10166
> Tel:   (212) 878-8075
> Fax:  (212) 878-8027
> email:  david.yeres@cliffordchance.com
>
>
>

*******

This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system.  If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person.

For further information about Clifford Chance please see our website at http://www.cliffordchance.com or refer to any Clifford Chance office.


The target date specified in an open audit observation has been reached.
Click on the document link below to view the observation / action step(s).
Please provide action step implementation detail along with completion date
and submit return response to Donna Lowry.  If you should have any questions
relating to this audit, please call the Observation Contact listed in the
following observation (document link).  Thank you.  NOTE:  EACH E-MAIL
REPRESENTS A SEPARATE AUDIT OBSERVATION.

Click on this link to view document -->


Mary,

This is all the information that I have when Ami first looked at all the CES
information.  It does not mention a processing agreement, but that does not
mean that there isn't one.

Daren - do you know anything about a processing agreement for the Devon gas
at the Gulf Plains plant as it relates to the CES acquisition?


Effective Monday, November 19, Mark Haedicke will office in the new building.  His location will be:  ECS 06788 (sixth floor, office number 788).

My new location will be ECS 06785 (just outside Mark's office).

Our telephone numbers and fax number will remain the same.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


Please see attached. Thank you.

Donna M. Cagle
Executive Administrator to President & CEO
Mariner Energy, Inc.
580 WestLake Park Blvd., Suite 1300
Houston, TX  77079
281/584-5511 (phone)     281/584-5515 (fax)
dcagle@mariner-energy.com

 <<Special BOD Mtg. Notice - 10-17-01.doc>>


Oops, I sent you the form, not the prebon draft.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001 05:29 PM -----

	Tana Jones
	01/11/2001 04:41 PM

		 To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Michael.bridges@enron.com
		 Subject: Re: LOI for Prebon

Attached is the proposed form of LOI for Prebon.  Is Prebon Energy the full
legal name of the company?

	Bob Shults
	01/10/2001 02:25 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Michael.bridges@enron.com
		 Subject: LOI for Prebon

Tana please draft a Broker Client Letter of Interest for Prebon Energy

Terms include

Products and Fee

North American Gas and Power  $250,000
UK and Worldwide Gas and Power $200,000

Term One Year

Please have Mike Bridges review prior to emailing to:

Lee C. Taylor
101 Hudson Street
Jersey City, New Jersey  07302-3908

201 557 5829/5208
fax 201 557 5962
lctaylor@prebon.com


Ben,

As per a voicemail I left you today, one of the Enron Global Markets Teams
(Global Risk Markets) is awaiting the reversal of a check (to Goldman Sachs)
that was wired out instead.  Kortney Brown and Dana Davis had worked with you
and Lupy Spencer on this before.  Last anyone heard, it had made it to your
desk.

I was checking to see if that was the case and if there would be any
difficulty in voiding a legacy MSA check on the new SAP system.  Please let
me know what you find or if you need any further information.

Stephen


Notice 2001039 is available for your review.

Notice Type:  GAS SCHEDULING
Notice Title: Compressor Fuel/L-U Values, May 1, 2001

Effective Date of Notice: 05-01-2001 09:00 AM through 06-01-2001 08:59 AM
Response Required? NO
Attachment Notice.rtf is included.

 - Notice.rtf


I can make time.  Let's try to let Leslie vacation.  Also, I'm having a memo prepared that should be ready first thing Monday AM on the CA Commission's policies regarding utility use of hedging instruments.  Just let me know when you'd like to talk.

Best,
Jeff


Mike Swerzbin says this deal is good - he's got it in his trade log as
Natsource. ???

Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
01/10/2001 02:06 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource

493987, is not there deal


Sorry for the last minute (general unavailability of attendees), but I have
arranged a meeting to discuss general issues on the paper & pulp desk at 2 pm
in EB 38C2.  Dale Neuner, Tanya Rohauer, Rudi Zipter, Ted Murphy should be
attending.  Please call me if you have any questions.  Sara


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 12:08 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           08/21/2000 09:45 AM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New England Gas Study - Scope of Work

NE-ISO is performing a very detailed gas study for the NE market (for
electric supply reliability purposes).  As a NEPOOL member, we will get a
copy of this study which will have great supply and demand information for
the NE market area.

I will get you a copy when the study is completed.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000
09:32 AM ---------------------------

Daniel Allegretti@EES
08/21/2000 09:27 AM
To: NEPOOL Power Trading Group
cc:
Subject: New England Gas Study - Scope of Work

FYI,  ISO-NE will be conducting a gas study.

---------------------- Forwarded by Daniel Allegretti/HOU/EES on 08/21/2000
10:26 AM ---------------------------

"Conway, Nancy" <nconway@iso-ne.com> on 08/18/2000 12:32:03 PM

To:	NEPOOL Reliability Committee <relcomm@iso-ne.com>
cc:

Subject:	New England Gas Study - Scope of Work

TO:  NEPOOL Reliability Committee Members and Alternates

Please note below (from Richard Burke):

Based on the request of the NEPOOL Reliability Committee at the August 15-16
meeting, the Scope of Work for the ISO's project entitled, "The New England
Gas Study" is forwarded for your information.  If the Members & Alternates
of the NEPOOL Reliability Committee  have any questions or comments
regarding the ISO's "New England Gas Study Project," please feel free to
contact either:

  Mr. Peter Wong - 413-535-4172  or  pwong@iso-ne.com
  or
  Mr. Mark Babula - 413-535-4324 or mbabula@iso-ne.com

 <<Gas Study SOW for NEPOOL RC.doc>>
Thank you.
Rich Burke
Admin. Assist.
Markets Development
ISO New England Inc.
e-mail:  nconway@iso-ne.com
phone:  413/535-4332
fax:  413/540-4226

 - Gas Study SOW for NEPOOL RC.doc


Energy Committee Members:
There will be a Public Participation Hearing before the CPUC on Friday, May
11 in San Jose.  The hearing will take place at 3pm at the Double Tree Hotel
at 2050 Gateway Place.  This will be an excellent forum for the business
community to express their concerns about the rate increase.  To participate
you must arrive early and sign-in to speak.  A member of the Public
Advisor's Office will be there for assistance.  To get more advice about
participation at the hearing contact the CPUC's Public Advisory Office.  I
will provide more information once I receive it.  Laura


I just told Mitch that I might be able to get him a little more $ in the form of cash/equity and mitigate his non-compete concerns.   He asked about the title and raise and said that you suggested title was possible and probably the only way to get more $.  Is he working us?  I am OK with a VP promotion because he sure seems like some of the other VP's, but Kevin did not think he earned it.  As such, I have been trying to convince him that there is no difference between VP and Director; he is one of 15 lead marketers (half VP, half Director) and he will be compared to his peers and more importantly he will be compensated based primarily on financial performance.

Bottom Line: VP with base of $150 gets him done.  I am trying to get him done with $25 cash/equity plus a $15K raise.  If you think it is better to bite the bullet and make him a VP, I am ok but we need to talk with Kevin.

I know this sounds flaky, but I don't know these East guys as well as you and Kevin do so I am relying on your input.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000 04:25
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  Mark Breese                           09/27/2000 05:56 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: