Energy supply setback: Big generator can't be forced to sell emergency power
to the state, a U.S. court rules.
By Denny Walsh and Carrie Peyton
BEE STAFF WRITERS
(Published April 6, 2001)
In a development that does not bode well for California's energy supply, a
federal appellate court Thursday halted enforcement of a lower court order
that a big electricity generator must sell emergency power to the state
without guarantee of payment.
State energy officials said the ruling wouldn't have any immediate effect but
could precipitate a power emergency if the generator decided to take a plant
off-line for maintenance.
On March 21, citing "rolling blackouts (that have) darkened the California
landscape," U.S. District Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. imposed an injunction
against Reliant Energy Services Inc., one of the nation's major generators.
Houston-based Reliant controls approximately 3,800 megawatts, or about 20
percent, of the gas-fired generation capacity in the state, and Damrell found
that loss of that production "poses an imminent threat."
But Thursday, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
granted an emergency stay of the injunction, saying Reliant has shown "a high
likelihood of success on the merits" of its appeal.
While not spelling it out, the panel apparently bases its finding on the
question of the courts' jurisdiction over the energy market. The panel
directed that a hearing on the appeal be scheduled for the second week in
July.
The decision leaves California's electric grid more fragile, at least
temporarily, according to the state Independent System Operator, which
maintains and controls power transmissions.
It gives the agency no immediate recourse if Reliant chooses to shut down any
of its plants for maintenance, said ISO Vice President Jim Detmers.
"It's not going to change anything overnight, and it's not going to change
anything over the weekend," said Detmers. "But if Reliant decided on a
unilateral action to take their units off for maintenance ... we definitely
could have a system emergency."
Reliant officials, when told of the ruling, took a conciliatory tone but
declined to specify their next move.
"Reliant ... has pledged to keep the lights on in California," said company
lobbyist Marty Wilson, and "is still of a mind to want to cooperate."
Without further comment, the appeals court judges cited a 1980 U.S. District
Court decision. In that case, 14 cities sued Florida Power and Light Co.,
alleging that it was violating a number of laws in its sales of power and
production of electricity.
The judge found, however, that the Federal Power Act reserves oversight of
interstate utilities exclusively to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
He ruled that only the commission may bring an action involving energy sales
into federal court -- unless it is a request to review a commission order,
and that goes directly to an appellate court.
The lawsuit before Damrell was brought by the ISO to force Reliant and two
other generators to respond to ISO's emergency orders for power, even though
the agency is buying on behalf of two retailers that are broke and hopelessly
in debt.
Because Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and Southern California Edison can't pay
their bills -- about $14 billion -- some wholesalers want to cut off sales to
the utilities.
The other three defendants in the ISO's suit -- Dynegy Power Corp. of Houston
and Tulsa-based AES Corp. and its marketer, Williams Energy Marketing &
Trading Co. -- have entered into written agreements with ISO to continue
supplying emergency power until the FERC decides whether they are required to
sell to companies that are not creditworthy.
But Charles Robinson, ISO general counsel, points out that the generators can
rescind those agreements with 48 hours' notice.
"My hope is this is a temporary setback," said Robinson. He added, however,
that the practical effect is "at least for now, we don't have a tool to
compel them to do what we believe they're obligated to do" -- respond to
emergency demands for power.
Reliant has insisted since the suit was filed Feb. 6 that Damrell has no
jurisdiction over the rate schedules that govern dealings between generators
and the ISO, and that the Federal Power Act mandates that the FERC must
settle any disputes about terms of those tariffs.
In issuing the injunction, Damrell acknowledged that the FERC has special
expertise concerning agreements between generators and ISO.
"Absent the extreme exigencies of the California power crisis, the court
agrees that a stay pending further action by the FERC would be proper," he
said. "But those are not the facts here. Electricity is in critically short
supply. The health and safety of the people of California are potentially at
risk."
Immediately upon receiving the 9th Circuit's order Thursday, attorneys for
the ISO asked Damrell to set an accelerated schedule for its motion to amend
the suit. The agency apparently has crafted a new complaint stressing its
view that the matter is an ordinary contract dispute over which the judge has
jurisdiction.
Damrell scheduled a hearing on the motion for Thursday.
In a further development that could complicate the state's dire need for
energy, an alternative supplier won a court fight Thursday to bypass the big
utilities and sell its power on the open market.
Timber giant Sierra Pacific Industries, which operates four biomass plants
that produce power for PG&E, obtained a temporary restraining order in
Sacramento Superior Court that says Sierra Pacific is not required to sell
its power to PG&E.
The ruling means PG&E and Southern Edison could lose power as alternative
energy generators, fed up with months of nonpayment, sue to be able to sell
their comparatively cheap product elsewhere, including outside the state.


CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store
or copy the information in any medium.
----------------------------------------------------------------

How about Thursday at 15:30?
?
Susan

>>>  <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 11/4/2000 00:36:50  >>>

Susan:? How about any of Wednesday - Friday, Nov.8, 9  or 10?? Houston is on
Central Std. Time.? Let me know.?S ara

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????  "Susan
Hopkinson"????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????
???????????????????  <susan.hopkinson@lo???????  To:????
<Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>??????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????  vells.com>????????????????  cc:????
<Michael.Moulton@enron.com>,  <Stephanie.Panus@enron.com>?????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????  Subject:???? Re:
SITA????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????  11/03/2000 05:38
AM????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????

CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are  confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not the named  recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose  the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store
or copy  the information in any  medium.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks  for your email Sara.? When would you like to do? the conferencec all
next week? I cannot do Monday, but any other time should be? fine.  Maybe if
you give me a couple of times that suit you then I can picko  ne?? I would
like my colleague Sharon Lewis to be free as well if?  possible.

Susan

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>  11/3/2000 01:33:15? >>>

Susan:? Sorry for the delay in  getting back to? you.? We have agreed to
delete the CSA and will  return a blackline to? you shortly.? You may recall
that SITAe xpressly requested that theE nron agreement be governed by
English law which  is why we prepared thisd ocument for execution by our
affiliate in London  with the jurisdictionl anguage appearing in the prior
draft.? There are  still issues posed by? your markup and we should be able
to schedule a  conference call next? week.? Thanks.??  Sara

????????????????????  "Susan?  Hopkinson"
????????????????????  <susan.hopkinson@lo????????  To:
<Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
????????????????????  vells.com>?????????????????  cc:
???????????????????????????????????????????????  Subject:?????  SITA
????????????????????  10/09/2000 03:27? AM

CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any  attachments are? confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not  the named? recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not  disclose? the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or  store
or copy? the information in any?  medium.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Further?  to my fax of 3 October we have SITA's instructions.

1 - Credit  Support? Annex :

SITA's position is unchanged. SITA does not wish to  have a Credit? Support
Annex.? SITA have asked that ENRON come up  with a proposal on? the term and
volume of the transactions on the basis  of no Credit Support? Annex.

2 - SITA does not provide investment  services ancillary to its? main
activities. Do you have any news  regarding ENRON on this? point?

Kind regards
Susan?  Hopkinson

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lovells?  (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and
Boesebeck Droste, practising  as? Lovells Boesebeck Droste in
some jurisdictions) is an international  lawf irm.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email,p lease? contact
the sender or the London Technology Department on +44  (0) 20 7296?  2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lovells  (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and
Boesebeck Droste, practising as  Lovells Boesebeck Droste in
some jurisdictions) is an international lawf irm.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please  contact
the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296  2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lovells (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and
Boesebeck Droste, practising as Lovells Boesebeck Droste in
some jurisdictions) is an international law firm.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact
the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296 2000.


The meeting will be held in Three Allen Center in 3AC 16C1.  June 4th from
1:00 - 4:00.  Lunch will be provided.

Janine Migden@ENRON

05/31/2001 01:38 PM

To: Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES,
John D Burrows/HOU/EES@EES, Nicole Schwartz/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, Brad J Snyder/HOU/EES@EES,
Rogers Herndon/Enron@EnronXGate, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Charles
Decker/HOU/EES@EES, Dave S Laipple/DUB/EES@EES, Adam Cooper/DUB/EES@EES, Dana
Saucier/DUB/EES@EES, Michael Littman/DUB/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Merola/HOU/EES@EES, Marc Ulrich/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Reinecke/HOU/EES@EES, Ron
McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ed Hamm
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: AEP Strategy Meeting

A meeting is set for Monday, June 4th from 1:00 - 4:00 cst in a conference
room to be provided to discuss the strategy for the meeting with AEP that is
scheduled for June 7th at 2pm at their offices in Columbus.  A dial-in number
will be made available and provided for the Monday meeting.

If I have inadvertently left someone off the distribution list, please
forward this email on to that person with my apologies.

AGENDA

1.  Regulatory Overview of AEP/Correspondence with AEP - Janine Migden (5min.)

2.  Overview of Enron's business in Ohio - Dave Laipple (5min.)

3.  FE's MSG Product - Nicole Schwartz (5min)

4.  New Business Opportunities - Jeff Ader, Brad Snyder (5 min.)

5.  Other Business Opportunites  (5 min.).

6.  Discussion of constraints on physical delivery into AEP - Rogers Herndon
(20 min.)

 * Ability to aggregate customers into pools to more effectively serve hourly
load
 * Ability of AEP to provide day ahead and hourly forecasts of aggregated load
 * Predetermined energy imbalance service
 * Predetermined ancilliary services
 * Pricing incentives to serve more load
                * Basic walk-through of standard protocol necessary to serve
load physically

7.  Formulation of Enron's Proposal to AEP - Group Discussion (60 Min.)

8.  Next Steps/ Enron Strategy - Group Discussion - (10 Min.)


This is in response to our meeting of April-10-2001 in Midland with Agave.

Assuming units #761 and #762 are now assigned to LEC-10" service, the below schematic is showing the capacity of the three remaining units #822, #842 and #845 at Atoka-3.

At suction pressure of 225 psig and discharge pressure of 560 psig the capacity is 36 mmcf/d.

The 36 mmcf/d is not a fixed capacity, if discharge pressure increases the capacity decreases. Basically it depends on the volume activities between Atoka-3 and Atoka-1 such as BP, Rio Pecos and GPM.
Please pass this on to Agave.

If you have any questions please call.


Just back in from my front yard -- a military jet of some sort is circling my
neighborhood and making a tremendous racket!  Several of my neighbors were
also out, so I was not the only one staring at the sky.  I don't know whether
we'll see fireworks later or if we've already missed them.  Jose and Gigi's
party was attended by more kids than ever.  There were a lot of West U
parents I did not recognize, but there were some lawyers from the Latin
American section that I know, so we had at least a few people to talk to.  We
did not stay long, just had some of the good Goode & Company BBQ, helped Gigi
with the pinatas, and got home around 7.  The traffic on I-45 was really
starting to pile up so I am glad we left when we did.

Enjoyed the weekend and I'm looking forward to your visit.

Love,
Sooz


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
12/23/98 10:19 AM ---------------------------
To: Fred Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Memo to Exchange to transfer positions

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
12/21/98 04:50 PM ---------------------------
To: Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Memo to Exchange to transfer positions

Here are my drafts of letters for ECT and Seagull regarding the transfer of
Seagull's positions at E.D.&F. Man.   Please let me know if you have any
questions.


Vince,
John Woodley and Catherine Flax both are looking forward to talking with you today.
I, and I know you do also, have the highest regard for Morgan Stanley and their stature in the energy business.
John Woodley's phone  212-761-5936  and I get Catherine at that number also.
Main #			212-761-4000

Best to you,
Bill
PS - I am calling up each of the resumes that you sent to me.  There are really special people.

William J. Toriello
Director of Energy Recruitment
Brookville Search, Inc.
212-697-8080 x3103


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000 04:53 PM -----

	Daniel Diamond
	06/08/2000 04:23 PM

		 To: jgilcrist@viant.com, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Danielson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Mike McConnell Presentation

---------------------- Forwarded by Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2000
04:21 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Julie Ferrara                           06/08/2000 03:50 PM

To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Presentation


Are we still on?  Where do you want to go?  I was thinking Mexican, but let
me know what you think.

DG    713-853-9573


>From: "Kevin Hlas" <kjh@rdigroup.com>
>To: "Tim" <tal@spiritone.com>, " Ray" <rjm@rdigroup.com>,        " Kevin
>Stangeland" <kss@rdigroup.com>
>Subject: Fw: Civil War Jokes!!!
>Date: 17 Nov 2000 12:12:13 -0800
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > >1. How many UofO graduates does it take to change a light bulb?
> > > Unknown, Still searching for a UofO graduate with the qualifications
> > >to do such a task!
> > >
> > >2. How do you get to UofO from OSU?
> > > Head south until you smell it, and east until you step in it!
> > >
> > >3. Why do Duck women wear bibs?
> > > To keep the chew off their dresses!
> > >
> > >4. Why is UofO thing of putting artificial turf in Autzen Stadium?
> > > To keep the cheerleaders from grazing!
> > >
> > >5. What do you get when you breed a Duck with a groundhog?
> > > Six more weeks of bad football!
> > >
> > >6. What is the difference between a Duck cheerleader and  an elephant?
> > > About 50 pounds!
> > > How do you make them equal?
> > > Force feed the elephant!
> > >
> > >7. What is the difference between a Duck at the bottom of a toilet and
> > >a quarter at the bottom of the toilet?
> > > The quarter is worth reaching for!
> > >
> > >8. Why do UofO graduates put their diplomas on the dashboards of their
> > >cars?
> > > So they can park in handicap spaces?
> > >
> > >9. What did the UofO graduate say to the Oregon State graduate?
> > > Would you like fries with that?
> > >
> > >10. How do you get a UofO graduate off your front porch?
> > > Pay him for the pizza!
> > >
> > >11. What's the difference between the Ducks and Rice Crispies?
> > > Rice Crispies know what to do in a bowl!
> > >
> > >12. Did you hear they're going to replace the Astroturf in Autzen
> > >Stadium with Cardboard?
> > > The Ducks look good on paper!
> > >
> > >13. What does a Duck grad call a Beaver Grad?
> > > Boss!
> > >
> > >14. What's the difference between a dead skunk and a dead Duck on the
> > >highway?
> > > There are skid marks in front of the skunk!
> > >
> > >15. What do you call a Duck football player with an IQ of 20?
> > > Gifted!
> >
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Greg, it is really up to you - if you have other things to do don't worry
about it.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000
05:59 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Greg Piper @ ENRON                           06/27/2000 04:32 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PRC on July 7th

Fran was the one asking me to go to the ENA Final VP PRC on the 7th since I
had a few months of data on Rodney, Edward, Ajello and Burnett.  Also, Rodney
and Edward were hoping I could attend ( I guess they think my attendance
would help them not hurt them!).  I can attend if you want and give my Q1
observations.  However, if you think you have it handled, that is OK for me
as well.  I am not emotional about it either way and am only concerned about
helping if you need it or want it.  That is why Kay asked you about it today.

Let me know your thoughts.

Thanks.

GP


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/13/2000
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,756
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,361
Total Life to Date Transactions	523,299

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/13/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,942	75%
Enron Europe Limited	152	32%
Global Products	221	32%
Enron Metals	441	21%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,538,905,272
MTD	36,081,188,074
LTD	315,251,605,119
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,422,966,414

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	20,901,379,076

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	609
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	2
Number of Products Offered Today	1,045
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,346
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,995


On July 17 , 2001, Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc. filed a complaint against the Southwest Power Pool, Inc.  Dynegy alleges that the SPP has violated its OATT by unreasonably restricting Point-to-Point Transmission Services customers' right to change of receipt and delivery points on a firm basis.  Specifically, Dynegy complains that SPP unfairly limits changes of receipt and delivery points to those that permanently redirect the reservation (i.e., for the balance of the reservation term).  Dynegy documents several specific instances in which its redirect requests were automatically denied.

I will keep you updated on this proceeding; if you would like more details on the complaint in the meantime, please let me know.

Susan Scott
x30596


October 22, 2001
Notice #MS-91

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO TRANSFER

	Please be advised that effective with the close of business, October
19, 2001, the following member (s) have given notice of intention to
transfer their sole membership privileges:

Steven Thomas Schiff (TS-8132)

	Members and Member Firms have (10) days from the date of this notice
to advise the Corporate Secretary's Office of any claims in accordance with
Rule 2.51.

	Inquiries regarding the above should be addressed to the Member
Services Department at 212-299-2378.


Hey there,
I don't have David's new email address.  I wanted to see if you all wanted to get together on the house on sunday.  We could grill something outside if you all want.  I'm not sure if David and Terry have other plans.  I would like to bring over a cake.  Let me know what works.


Call me to discuss if needed.
The excel file has a shortened version of the questions along with the answers and scores.  The word file is the full set of questions with the answer choices.

Thanks, Jane


Enjoy the slashed pricing on all purchases now through December 18
because the joy of giving is sometimes in the savings!

                  ** My Engagement Ring! **

We will set your diamond in a platinum prong and 18 karat gold
"Tiffany" style solitaire mounting, at no additional cost. An
all-platinum mounting is included with diamonds over $6000.

http://www.myengagementring.com/cgi-bin/mx.cgi?af=HOL&pg=in

 o With over 50 years of experience as diamond wholesalers
 o Offering only the finest certified diamonds
 o Tiffany solitaire mounting included
 o Extraordinary savings
 o Free Fedex shipping
 o 30 day unconditional return policy

Shop online or Call 1-888-373-2424 for expert personalized
assistance.

--------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been individually sent to you because we think
you may be interested(or even joyous) to hear this news. If you
wish to be removed from our mailing list, simply reply with REMOVE
in the subject line.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Happy Holidays!


Julia:
Here are my thoughts on possible invitees outside of the ENA legal group,
Kristina and Robin:

Marie Heard
Larry Lawyer
Trina Chandler
Alicia Curry
Shirley Hudler
Anne Yaeger
Jordan Mintz
Deborah Culver
Robert Stephens
Gareth?

Carol


Enron's NY Risk Management Seminar will take place on Thursday, April 6th in
New York City.  Below are:

Enron Invitation
Enron letter to NY policymakers
List of NY policymakers who are planning to attend
List of wholesale customers invited
Schedule of presenation

List of NY Policy Makers Attending
Assemblyman Paul Tonko
John Howard, Chief of Staff to Assemblyman Tonko
John Cahill, Senior Policy Advisor to Govenor Pataki
Mary Ellen Burns, Assistant Attorney General - Energy Division
Gavin Donohue, Independent Power Producers of New York
Richard Miller, Senior VP for Energy, NY City Economic Development Corporation
(Just as an aside, our power traders met separately with a large group of PSC
staffers in March to discuss Risk Management)

Updated Invite List

Schedule of Presenation
Michael Brown, Power Outlook, 30-40 minutes
Craig Breslau, Natural Gas Outlook, 30-40 minutes
Janelle Scheuer, Hedging Strategies, 1 hour
Gary Taylor, Weather Risk Management, 15-20 minutes

Binders with all presentations will be made available to attendees


The Networks/Financial Trading QLR scheduled for today at 9:00 a.m. has been cancelled.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


I faxed a copy of the PSNC invoice for March to Brian Perrone.  I show this
as a purchase from CES at St 85.  Also, I believe March is the last month CES
is taking the gas from CES.

Brian, I'm tossing my copy, let me know if you have questions.

Thanks.


If you look in tagg, the sitara deal number is in the comments section -
#372156.  If any of you guys want us to come up and show you how to use tagg
or what we do to find these numbers, give me a shout.  The deal is
liquidating in the Ontario book because the Ontario trader did the deal.  If
that trader does a deal at a US point, the gas has to physically flow out of
a US book, not a canadian book.  This deal is only for one month, so this
will not make Jim Little's recurring list that he automatically transfers for
you guys.  Let me know if you have any more questions.  I also got some
message from Souad that you need some help with a People's deal.  She thought
you said you emailed me on the deal and I do not have an email, let me know
if you still need assistance with that issue.  Thanks.
PL

Doug Nelson@ENRON
03/06/2001 07:31 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SITARA #?

Phillip,

I have tried unsuccessfully to detemine the SITARA number for
TAGG deal #NW0078.3

I suspect it should be in CENTRAL and not ONTARIO.
Please advise.

Thanks,
Doug


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/23/2000 07:43 AM -----

	Tom Moran
	05/22/2000 06:41 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global Contracts
and Facilities, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EOL / Credit / GCP Responses 5/22/00

Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 5/22/00

Regards
tm


I appreciate all that you have done.  There are 7 days remaining.  I wish I
was leaving tomorrow.  I miss him dearly.  Three to four years is going to be
a challenge.  In that time frame I must finish school and both of my daughters
would have graduated from high school and 8th grade.  The apartment was
bothering me on yesterday.  It was laid on my heart to call her and let her
know everything up front.  She had to run a credit report, you know that is
not good due to the circumstances.  I let her also know why I can not move
until March 1.  Emotionally I wish I could move Feb.1.  Financially I would be
set to move and start my new life of March 1.  I prayed about on last night
and turned it over to JESUS and I am not to worry about it.  I see the lady on
today.  My whole life will be on the move in the month of Feb.  If all goes
well I should receive the package no later than Tuesday.  Keep your head up
about the class.  If you need to pull Hunter to the side and work with him
personally do that.  May be L can help?  Beside missing RC I am okay.

>>> Patrice.L.Mims@enron.com 01/30 1:01 PM >>>
Hey "G",  what's up?  I know you will be shocked, but I brought the purse
and necklace into the office and will be sending them out this
afternoon....so there!  How's it going this morning?

I have been sitting in a class all morning that Hunter is teaching.  It's
on options and volatility.  Boy, that stuff does not sink in well with me,
I find the class a real challenge.  I'm so uncomfortable in the class.
Pray for me, because I need to get this stuff and be able to chart this
stuff.  Everyone is real helpful though, but being put on the spot, its
hard to come up with the answers quickly.  It's painful for me....whew!

Talk with you later.......how many days left now?

Love ya

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Valada Brawner" <VBrawne@nicor.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Monday, January 28, 2002 10:46 AM
   To:     Mims, Patrice L.
   Subject:  Good Morning  :)

   When this email reaches you I pray that you are fine and well.  How was
   your weekend?  When are you suppose to see the lawyer?  I spoke with
   mine over the phone on Sat. and will be seeing the other one on this
   week.  Frank and I have to write out the agreement between the two of
   us.  The lady call me about the apartment, the prospect that was there
   before I was did not get it.  She offered the apartment to me.  I went
   in there praying and I guess the Lord saw fit.  I am soo afraid/scared.
   I woke up this morning and told Frank that he hurt me and that if I seem
   evil I do not mean to be it is because I am hurt and angry.  I caught
   him crying in the basement.  Patrice, I wish my dad was alive to receive
   a huge hug.  I love you.  Thanks for being there.

   VAL

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized
to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron
Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an
offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the
intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as
the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Here it is.       dedeutsch@duke-energy.com

	Janel Guerrero@ENRON
	05/12/2000 12:52 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Hi.  Will you send me "Movieline Dave's" email address?  I'm trying to put
together a happy hour for next week and I want to include him so he and Lara
can meet.  (Although I don't think the two of them are really going to dig
each other very much).  Oh well, it's a good excuse to drink.

thanks.


Andrew Lewis' Portfolio No. 1 at StockSelector.com
For Wednesday, April 18, 2001

To view your portfolio online, please go to
http://www.stockselector.com/portfolio.asp?portnumber=1

***********
FREE BROKER RESEARCH REPORT
Is Coke it? Coca-Cola Co. (KO) Analysts at Prudential Securities give
Coca-Cola Co. (KO) a STRONG BUY rating. Comparing the current industry slump
to a similar situation in 1994, they say that the soft-drink company is
positioned to take advantage of an improved environment. Please go to
http://www.multexinvestor.com/ACHome.asp to download the free broker
research report.
***********
Previous  Today's  Dollar  Percent
Name   Close   Close   Change  Change
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
AMES DEPARTMENT $1.62   $1.80   $0.18   11.11%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=AMES

SYNAGRO TECH IN $2.04   $2.05   $0.01   0.49%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=SYGR

FREEREALTIME.CO $0.14   $0.14   $0.00   0.00%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=FRTI

MPHASE TECH INC $1.05   $1.33   $0.28   26.67%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=XDSL

STARNET COMM IN $0.66   $0.70   $0.04   6.06%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=SNMM

TOTAL ENTERTAIN $0.06   $0.06   $0.00   6.90%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=TTLN

SYNAGRO TECH IN $2.04   $2.05   $0.01   0.49%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=SYGR

FCCN not found N/A    N/A    N/A   N/A
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=FCCN

BEST BUY CO INC $47.50  $54.70  $7.20   15.16%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=BBY

AMERITRADE HOLD $5.71   $6.00   $0.29   5.08%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=AMTD

GIC GLOBAL INTE $0.01   $0.01   $0.00   0.00%
http://www.stockselector.com/quote.asp?symbol=GGNC

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Portfolio Total    $9,753.60  $834.00  9.35%

Dow Jones Indusrial Average 9,999.00  0.00   0.00%
S & P 500    1,236.79  45.26   3.80%
NASDAQ Composite   2,079.44  156.22   8.12%
Russell 2000   463.44  7.86   1.73%
Wilshire Index   706.19  21.29   3.11%

To unsubscribe or modify any other options, please go to
http://www.stockselector.com/modifyportfolio.asp?symbol=1

, Copyright 1999, StockSelector.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyers, Bert
Sent:	Saturday, July 21, 2001 3:05 PM
To:	Rawson, Lester
Cc:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	LV COGEN for 07/21/01

Les,

FYI, LV COGEN went off line @ 15:00.  We called SRP to inform them of the cut and Vanessa said she sees the schedule as unit contingent so she agreed to go to zero on the schedule.

Bert


fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000 07:25 AM -----

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	11/29/2000 04:03 AM

		 To: Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron merger talks

Just in case you had not seen this.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 29/11/2000
10:05 ---------------------------

Kyran Hanks
29/11/2000 09:09
To: Alfredo Huertas/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron merger talks

A

Something that you have not been telling us?

K.


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

EXPERIENCE THE PEACE SOFTWARE DIFFERENCE.
DISCOVER THE POWER OF SUCCESS.
Peace Software customers are experiencing real, measurable results using
Peace's advanced customer and commodity suite, EnergyTM.
Discover what the world's leading energy providers already know.

Leading energy providers prefer Peace Software. Find out why...at CIS, Booth
#501.

www.usa.peace.com/CIS2001

[IMAGE]

Vice President Cheney recently stated that to meet projected energy demands
the US requires between 1,300 and 1,900 new power plants.  That averages out
to more than one new plant per week, every week, for 20 years running. Learn
about the pivotal role of natural-gas  based generation in solving the US
energy crisis, attend Natural Gas and Power Generation Strategies 2001, June
13-15,Tucson, AZ.

[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH. The Wall Map measures 42" x
72"; the Executive Map Set consists of 18 11" x 17" maps. Visit our website
at www.scientech.com for a detailed description of these valuable maps and
complete ordering instructions.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
May 9, 2001

Peace Software and IBM Sign Customer
Management Deal with Xcel Energy

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]

IssueAlerts LIVE FROM THE CIS CONFERENCE NEXT WEEK

Next week I will be attending the 25th Annual CIS conference in  Albuquerque,
N.M. On Wednesday, Thursday and Friday, I will be writing  SCIENTECH's daily
IssueAlert directly from the floor of the conference,  providing you with the
latest news and analysis about emerging technologies  in the energy industry.
Key issues to be addressed at the conference  include CIS / CRM activities,
billing strategies and billing software,  meter reading, the application
service provider (ASP) model, and a  technology forecast for the industry.
Each day at the conference I will  select the most important issue of the day
and provide you with the  independent analysis that you've come to expect
from IssueAlert. So even if  you can't attend the conference, you can still
participate in the dialogue  and information exchange. --Will McNamara

Peace Software announced that it will join with IBM Global Services to
deliver large-scale and advanced technology solutions to utility and retail
energy companies operating in regulated and deregulated markets. Using
"state-of-the-art and proven approaches," IBM Global Services and Peace
Software will plan, develop, test, and deliver customer-specific
implementations of Peace's Energy suite. Services will span the life cycle of
an installation from rapid deployment through production site enhancement and
maintenance. Peace and IBM have secured a contract to provide full customer
management services for Xcel Energy, which expands upon a strategic alliance
that has already existed between the utility and IBM.

Analysis: Both Peace Software and IBM have been aggressively pursuing the
same customer management space for some time. The fact that the two companies
have now come together to combine their unique skill sets establishes a
strong competitive force in this fast-growing arena, which can include
outsourced billing, meter reading, data collection, customer care, CRM, and
CIS systems. IBM Global Services, as an information technology services
provider, brings an operational and management capability for back-office
requirements. In turn, Peace Software provides a unique suite of billing and
customer data software that many utilities are purchasing as they move from
legacy systems to more flexible solutions.

As noted, Peace Software and IBM Global Services immediately followed the
announcement of their partnership with a new multi-million, five-year
contract with Minneapolis, Minn.-based Xcel Energy. Under the contract, the
two companies will implement Peace's Energy suite to support Xcel's 3.5
million regulated and deregulated electricity and gas customers located in 11
Western and Midwestern states. In addition, the Peace suite will be used to
support Xcel Energy's participation in Texas' deregulation pilot program,
which begins in June. The project will replace Xcel Energy's mainframe and
client / server legacy system. The implementation plan for Xcel Energy
includes all customer management, commodity billing and Internet components
that are offered in the Peace Energy software.

The contract with Xcel expands upon an already-established alliance between
IBM and the utility that dates back to 1995 (IBM originally contracted with
Public Service Co. of Colorado, an early predecessor to Xcel Energy). Under
the $400 million, 11-year alliance, IBM has provided data-center operations
and disaster recovery for Xcel Energy, including networking, help desk, PC
and LAN support, distributed services support, and application development
and maintenance services. Through the agreement, Xcel Energy awarded IBM
"preferred provider status," making IBM the vendor of choice for any IT
products and services that the utility may need.

In this next phase of the partnership with Xcel, IBM appears to be moving the
focus on a mainframe and client-server system to a packaged product for Peace
Software. This is a major step for Xcel, as many utilities still retain
internal control over their own applications and are reticent to outsource
these functions to an outside company. In addition, this is a huge deal for
Peace and IBM as they may be planning to eventually extend the platform
beyond the partnership with Xcel.

In fact, Xcel Energy is just the latest in a growing list of competitive
utilities and energy companies that have outsourced or replaced their billing
/ customer care needs. In competitive markets, a prerequisite for the
continued growth of an energy company or utility is a comprehensive billing
software system that can handle the complexities of an unbundled environment,
which is where the value of Peace Software comes in. Most competitive retail
providers realize that they must be able to provide customers with online
energy usage and billing data on a 24/7 basis. Further, as competitive energy
providers operate in different states, it is important that they eliminate
the different automated and manual processes that are common in legacy
systems. This can result in a real cost savings for an energy company as it
can eliminate back-office functions such as taking calls for final reads and
address changes, all of which can be handled directly by the customer through
online software.

An energy company basically has two options with regard to billing / customer
care solutions. The first option is for the energy company to purchase the
billing software directly from a software provider such as Peace and manage
its own billing needs. The second option is to completely outsource the
entire billing / customer care services to a company such as IBM Global
Services. By joining forces, Peace Software and IBM are anticipating that
energy companies will be inclined to not only select the Peace software, but
also opt to use IBM Global Services' implementation and management services.

Peace's Energy software, which reportedly is being rapidly deployed in 20
transitioning energy markets around the world, is designed to provide several
self-serve features, including customer enrollment, summary billing, more
flexible due dates and electronic payment options. The Energy suite was
developed for retail energy companies and is capable of handling many
functions required by retailers, from enrollment and registration to billing
to settlement and load forecasting. The last two features are particularly
noteworthy as, up to this point, they have been rarely found in billing
software. Many systems in the United States today are building this
competency or are "bolting on" the technology; Peace already offers it in an
integrated tool.

Peace's Energy Version 6 software, which was released in December 2000, is
billed as the first e-business solution to integrate customer and commodity
management. The upgraded features of Energy Version 6 include B2C e-commerce
functions, an advanced third-generation browser user interface (BUI),
enhanced billing capabilities and expanded industry-standard support for the
Oracle 8i database system. The result of these technical improvements,
according to Peace, is a "capability to exploit the latest Web browser
technologies to support and streamline large scale, mission-critical customer
service operations." Further, the Energy software is centered around the UNIX
operating system and thus can be moved and upgraded from one hardware
platform to another. The Energy software can accommodate billing services
around natural gas, electricity, water, home security, and home mortgaging.
The end result is that an energy service provider can group all of its
services into one bill stating one cost, which is a market edge against
competitors that only provide multiple billing.

On its own, Peace Software has become a dominant player in the energy billing
software market, offering its "one-stop-shop" billing tool to a variety of
utilities and energy companies. Peace boasts customers such as AEP,
MidAmerican Energy, Enron, BC Gas, Dominion Retail, Nordic Electric, Exelon
Energy, and Pepco Services. Peace has also entered the Canadian gas market by
implementing its Energy suite at BC Gas, headquartered in Vancouver. The
company is based in Miami and maintains a large presence in its country of
origin, New Zealand, the first country to deregulate its electric utility
market.

The company has used strategic partnerships as one method of growing its
business. Prior to this partnership with IBM Global Services, Peace Software
announced in early April an alliance with Exolink, a provider of retail
energy business process integration services. Under this partnership, Peace
and Exolink are marketing a platform for energy retailers in both regulated
and unregulated markets in which customer data can be shared in and out of
multiple markets. Peace also just signed a contract with Delinea, a vertical
services provider, in which Delinea has licensed Peace's Energy software as a
customer management application targeted at mid-sized utilities.

However, the billing / customer care market is arguably one of the most
competitive businesses to have emerged from electric deregulation.
Consequently, the list of competitors that Peace Software and IBM Global
Services face grows literally every month. I cannot list all of the
competitors here, but a few are worth mentioning as they have grown at a
similar pace to Peace and IBM. Such competitors include Alliance Data Systems
(ADS), ConneXt, Enlogix, Excelergy, Itron's MV-PBS, LODESTAR, Orcom
Solutions, SCT Banner, SPL Worldgroup, and US Power Solutions. Some of these
companies offer just the software solution, which is licensed to utilities or
energy companies, while others serve as the outsourced management company
that implements the software package. The partnership between Peace Software
and IBM Global Services runs parallel to similar partnerships between ADS /
Excelergy and Enlogix / SCT software.

Currently, SCIENTECH is witnessing a trend away from large license-only
agreements and into Strategic Sourcing agreements. In the customer care field
today, Enlogix is the largest application service provider with over 3
million end customers in production today. Orcom is the second largest, with
over 1 million "live" customers. Realistically, it will be about two years
before Peace and IBM are able to fully migrate all of Xcel's 3.5 million
customers to the Peace software. However, if this transition materializes, it
could represent the largest outsourced customer care contract to date.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


Thanks!
 <grin>

   Kate Symes                02/14/2001 04:19 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: #523070

sorry! that's a little vague - it's been changed to CAISO energy.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           02/14/2001 02:20 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: #523070

This deal has an SP delivery point with firm energy.

Thanks!


please add mike grigsby to distribution list.


Mark:
I need for you to send an e-mail to Michelle Word informing her of the
following in connection with my leave that you have approved:

1. In addition to the 6 weeks that Enron allows for leave, I am planning on
adding to that period and using any remaining vacation time that I have for
2000 which I believe is an additional 10-12 days.

2. After that time is used up, I plan to take an unpaid leave of absence.
Michelle informs me that I have to specify a date and as you are aware I am
not sure how long I will take but if I need to specify a date, let's just
pick until December 31, 2000 and as you and I have discussed, I will keep you
informed throughout my leave as to what my plans are once I decide.

3. Tentatively, I am planning for July 14th to be my last day but I should
know more after next Wednesday.

Thanks and let me know if you have any questions.

Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 12:20 PM -----

	Michele Word@ENRON
	07/06/2000 12:00 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Forms to be Signed

Hi Carol,

All I need is a note from the Dr. showing the delivery date.  If you are
planning on taking any additional time, it must be cleared by your supervisor
prior to you leaving.
I can give you a form to return once the baby is born if you are going to add
the baby to your insurance.

Let me know if you have any additional questions.

	From:  Carmen Chavira @ ECT                           07/05/2000 11:28 AM

To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michele Word/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Forms to be Signed

Michele Word will process your leave, please call her at 345-8662 for an
appointment.

Thanks
Carmen

   Carol St Clair                06/30/2000 03:20 PM

To: Carmen Chavira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Forms to be Signed

Carmen:
Per my voice mail message to you, I need to get with you to get all of the
paperwork done that needs to be done before I go on leave.  I would very much
like to do that next week for I am close to me delivery date.  Please call
me.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Hi there, how about tomorrow around lunch time?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Swartz, Cristina" <CSWART@coair.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 3:18 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	RE:
Importance:	High

I've got 2 samples of fabric.  1 plain off white and the other a ribbed off
white.  Elizabeth and I prefer the ribbed.
Plain = $40 retail / $20 cost
Ribbed = $50 retail  / $25 cost x 34 yards = $850
I'll give them to you at cost so that we can continue furnishing your house
( I hear it's empty).
If you have time this afternoon and can walk down to your Lobby I can meet
you there to show you the fabrics.  Also, bring down a check so that I can
stop by Walter Lee Culp and order you couches and fabric ma?ana.  Fabric can
be overnighted if needed or sent 2 day.
I think 2 day is plenty of time.

50% now - (not including taxes)
50% later + shipping and taxes when couches are ready for delivery (6-8
wks.).

Need now
$5445 for 2 loveseats and 1 couch + $850 for fabric = $6295
I will give you a receipt.
Let me know when you can see the fabric........
Tina

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:59 PM
To: CSWART@coair.com
Subject: RE:

Good.  I'm going to Cabo thursday and will be back early sunday.  If you
have a few samples, I'll pick one, and well go forward.  Can we order the 3
sofas, and send them the fabric when it comes so we can get in the line of
orders?  No problem on the check.

What do you think of them?  Be brutal.

Jeff

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Swartz, Cristina" <CSWART@coair.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:49 PM
   To:     Shankman, Jeffrey A.
   Subject:  RE:

   Retail for couch is $5460 (saving $1170 about  27% lower)
   Retail for loveseat $4200 (saving $900 about 27% lower.)
   I may be able to save you more on the fabric if I can find the one you
   need
   at Kravets since they give me 50% off.  The majority of the furniture
   stores
   only give between a 20-30% off.  The couches take about 6-8 weeks if
   they
   are in stock and usually are.  I'll get some fabric this Friday during
   lunch
   and maybe I can show you over coffee that afternoon.  I'll need to order
   the
   fabric so add another 2 weeks at least before the store gets it.  Also,
   I'll
   find out paying conditions but usually is 50% upfront (cash) and then
   the
   other 50% when ready for delivery.  They don't take credit card.  Checks
   payable to me and I pay with my company check.
   I'll get moving and call you on Friday.
   Sound good?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:25 PM
   To: CSWART@coair.com
   Subject: RE:

   Holy cow this is expensive.  Of course I don't care about your 5% or so,
   but what is the retail on these babies?  I'm pretty flexible on the
   fabric--mid range would be fine.  Let's move ahead.  (2 loveseats
   though,
   not 1)  How long did they say?

   Jeff

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Swartz, Cristina" <CSWART@coair.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Monday, October 15, 2001 5:04 PM
      To:     Shankman, Jeffrey A.
      Subject:  RE:

      OK...
      Sofa = $4290
      Loveseat = $3300
      8.25% tax = $626.18.
      Total = $8,216.18.  Both w/out fabric.

      You need a total of 23.5 yards of fabric.  I usually get about a
   30-35%
      discount on fabric so if you are OK with the couch prices, I can go
   to
      the
      Decorative Center and get some fabric samples for you to choose from.
   I
      have no clue as to how much indoor/outdoor fabric goes for but I'll
   get
      a
      range so that you can see the difference between the cheaper and
      expensive
      type.  Let me know how you would like to proceed.
      Thanks, Tina

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Shankman, Jeffrey A. [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@ENRON.com]
      Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 10:30 AM
      To: cswart@coair.com
      Subject:

      Hi Tina,

      Thanks for you help.

      The site is www.thewickerworks.com.  Click on it to go directly
   there.
      The are in Houston at Walter Lee Culp.  713 623 4670.

      If you go to their web site go to the home page, then to the tab that
      says wicker, then to the tab that says more.  The design is Helva.

      I need 1 Helva sofa, and 2 Helva loveseats, of course in a very plain
      off white (not tan as one of the pictures shows) indoor/outdoor
   fabric.

      Or if you have any other ideas, let me know, of course.

      Regards,

      Jeff

      713 853 1761

   **********************************************************************
      This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
   affiliate
      and
      may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
   the
      intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
   by
      others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
   (or
      authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
   or
      reply
      to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
      all
      copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
   not
      intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
   evidence
      a
      binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
      affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
   not
      be
      relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
   otherwise.
      Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Here's what I have for an electronic file of the exhibits.

Kay


Mark,

I would like to contact you in order to follow up to your conversation of
last week with Mr. Chuck Cerria regarding executing an ISDA between numerous
Hess entities and numerous Enron entities.  Unfortunately, I do not have
your phone number.  Could you either call me or e mail it to me?

Thanks so much,

Dana Dellacona
212-536-8133


- DRIPS2000.doc
 - DRIPincome2000.doc


Thanks, I appreciate it!

	Nicola Beales
	11/01/2000 04:08 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: UK Online Documents

Tana,

As requested, please find attached copies of each of the UK ETA and the UK
PA.

Kind regards,

Nicola

---------------------- Forwarded by Nicola Beales/LON/ECT on 01/11/2000 10:09
---------------------------

Justin Boyd
01/11/2000 08:00
To: Nicola Beales/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: UK Online Documents

Nic

If you could deal with this, thanks

J
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 01/11/2000 08:03
---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 31/10/2000 16:50 CST
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: UK Online Documents

Justy,

We are going to be trading with Deutsche Bank out of their New York and
London branch offices online.  Per my conv. w/the online team, we going to
have to have them come in thru both Houston and London as a counterparty (we
haven't solved multibranch customers online).  With Edmund out, I need
someone to email me your Electronic Trading Agreement and Password
Application so we can send them to the lawyer we are negotiating the ISDA
Master with.  Can you have someone there send me the docs.

Much thanks...


The Supreme Court has ruled that there cannot be a nativity scene in
Washington, D.C. this Christmas.

This isn't for any religious reason.  They simply have not been able to
find three wise men and a virgin in the Nation's capitol.

There was no problem however finding enough asses to fill the stable.

Happy Holidays,
Jim Doering

Navigant Consulting Inc.
781-564-9732


Nav,

How are you doing? What are you doing? I am still working for Enron. I have
been trading nat gas for about 3 years. I am moving to Houston at the end of
the month. In my next life I am going to be trading electricity in the NE US.
Should be interesting. Crazy volatility. I will probably have a heart attack
at 26 but that's life. Hope things are going well for you.

w/b

Chris Dorland


Please place the attached in attorney files.   Thanks!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Nancy,

Here are some come comments to the draft PPA:

As a general note, we would have these goals:

1.  Keep the PPA has streamlined as possible, putting as much as we can in
the interconnection agreement.
2.  Minimize ties to specific unit.
3.  Maximize optionality, especially delivery points.
4.  Keep construction/ownership of the facility off the balance sheet.
5.  Signing the interconnection agreement must be simultaneous, or a CP.

More specifically we would like to:

Move start up/metering terms to interconnection agreement.
Megawatts will probably change due to change in equipment.  Bracket 192 for
now.  The capacity will change for summer and winter, also, specifics to be
determined.
Make sure we are protected from any liability caused by their delay.

Comments on specific articles:
Definition of emergency start up will belong in interconnection agreement.
2.2  Expiration is Dec. 31, 2004; move  bracketed language into interconnect.
2.3  We need an out in case we don't commence construction/achieve commercial
operation as a result of Buyer's action/inaction, and the term "breach"
should include failure to timely perform any of buyer's obligations under any
of the agreements. Any reason why we shouldn't want an extension if there is
a delay due to action/inaction of any governmental authority?  We can add
change of law as an event which gives us schedule relief, but we might want
to broaden the definition of change of law. Also, we don't have the site
acquired yet, so we may need an out in case we encounter a problem, unless we
will not sign this agreement before acquiring the site.
3.4  Peak period is July and August.
3.5 (b) Amount left over will depend on the summer and winter capacity.
Might just leave blanks as placeholders.
3.5 (c) Let's try for 4 hours notice.
3.5 (d) suggest title "Start-Up Minimum Run Time".
3.5 (e)  add maximum of ___ per year.
Need a minimum shut down time between start ups.
4.6 Note:  3.3 refers to alternate sources and market sources; 4.6 refers to
the wholesale market.  We should pick a term, define it, and use it
throughout.
8.1 (c)  replace "covenant" with "obligation", and follow with "(other than
payment)". Default isn't a remedy, so there's a disconnect in that sentence.
8.1 (d) remove "shall" and conform grammar in romanettes.
8.3 refers to LD's, 4.8 but I didn't see any unless 4.8 is meant to encompass
the concept. A little unclear to me.  How is this supposed to work with 4.8?
Is there any reason the damage waiver can't be absolute?  Does the sole and
exclusive language in 4.8 need to be conspicuous, or is it ok?
9.1  Is the demand charge included in the invoice, or is it due without an
invoice?
10.1 On the third line, shouldn't the second "Seller" be "Buyer"?
15.  No mediation.
16.1  Delete oral amendment language.

Exhibits:
A. Megawatts, heat  rate to be confirmed.  Heat rate believed to be 10,600.
Deleted bracketed language about implied cost of fuel from alternate source
energy.  Start up costs:  $500.  Emergency start up to be addressed later.

Could we schedule a conference call for Friday or Monday to discuss any
questions/issues.  Please let me know your availability.

Thanks,

Kay


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude50.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas50.pdf

July Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLN50.pdf
Brent Continuation     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/QO50.pdf

Distillate and unleaded charts to follow.

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG50.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG50.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL50.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


I ran across this article in the Yomiuri Newspaper (but I cannot find it in
the US press) and thought you might find it interesting in light of our
inroads into Japan.

The presidents of Tokyo Power and Chubu Power announced that in the spring,
they and eight other Japanese power companies would merge their
telecommunications and Internet businesses into a new company.  This company
seems to be based on a telecommunications joint venture (PNJ Communications)
that they formed last year.  They are hoping to get 20% of their capital from
the American company Qwest Communications International.

It is not strange to see Japanese companies cooperating with competitors.
Joint ventures with Western companies are still rare, but less so recently,
given the longevity of the economic malaise in Japan, and the severe
profitability and balance sheet problems of some Japanese companies.
Nevertheless, as far as I know, this is the first time that power companies
have made such an effort.  In the past, they have generally maintained
mutually respectful local monopolies.  I think that deregulation has them
very worried.  I imagine that they will continue with this cooperation as
they feel more and more threatened by Enron and other Western companies.

Eugenio


--
I love this because I hate that damn fish so much!

k

 - dab.exe


Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange
The newsletter for the true Texas Longhorn faithful

Volume 11, No. 16, April 23, 2001

True Orange Crystal Ball Shows 2001 Season
Will Be Longhorns' Break-Through Year

My crystal ball was a little faulty last year because it didn't show TE Bo
Scaife going down for the season in the first pre-season practice.
Without that important piece of data, I predicted the Longhorns would win at
least 10 regular season games.
They won nine without Scaife and I think they would have won 10 with him
because the Stanford loss came before the great freshmen wide receivers
became the go-to guys on the team.
I'm more confident this year because the Longhorns are deeper and even more
talented than they were last season, so I'm going to go way out on a limb and
predict the 2001 season will be remembered as the one we all will recall as
the Horns' "break-through" year.
By that, I mean I think they will break into the top 10 and stay there for
years and years.
Since the Longhorns haven't finished in the top 10 since 1982, that sounds
like a tall order for this team.
This will be coach Mack Brown's fourth team at Texas and it should be his
best one by far.
His fourth recruiting class will enroll in September, and it will be his
third straight great one. that means the first group of great recruits will
be starting their third years. They will be juniors or redshirt sophomores.
The third year normally is one when players who have been able to play at a
high level at times learn how to play at a high level consistently.
This team will have some flaws, but every team has flaws. The great teams
simply have enough great players to win in spite of their flaws.
The Longhorns have offensive weapons that are almost off the chart. With a
healthy Scaife, who is that rarity at TE ) a swift, sure-handed guy who can
turn a six-yard pass into an 80-yard score ) to go along with
sophomores-to-be Roy Williams and B. J. Johnson, who broke every Longhorn
freshman receiving record last year.
When a team has an awesome tight end, and Scaife is one of those, with
sophomore Brock Edwards not too far behind, it creates match-up problems for
any defense.
Linebackers normally cover tight ends, and good tight ends, even one who
aren't really fast, usually win those matchups. Fast tight ends who can catch
in a crowd usually draw coverage from a safety.
But then Williams and Johnson create problems because Williams almost always
draws double coverage and Johnson is a huge threat to go all the way if one
safety is worrying about Scaife and the other one is helping out on Williams.
QB Chris Simms seems to be developing into the great player he was expected
to be after all the recruiting services tabbed him as the No. 1 prospect in
the country when he was a senior in high school.
The obvious solution for a defensive coordinator would be to play five or six
defensive backs most of the time or to go to a zone defense.
But Brown says the Horns will be a better running team than they have been
since Ricky Williams departed, and a more experienced line and a bigger
tailback should make that happen.
Hodges Mitchell was a great little tailback, but this offense is designed
primarily to pass or run between the tackles.
When you want to run between the tackles, it helps to have a big, powerful
tailback.
The tailback this season, whether it is one of the returnees or heralded
recruit Cedric Benson, will be bigger and more powerful than Mitchell.
The line was a good pass-blocking unit last year, and with four of the five
guys back, it should be much better this year.
The only big question about the offense will be one of consistency. When
Simms, who shared time with Major Applewhite last season, was at the helm,
the team often had long, long dry spells.
In the 43-17 victory over Texas A&M, for example, what most people remember
is the Longhorns' four-touchdown explosion in the third quarter.
But I remember being scared silly at the half because the offense had made
only one first down in the entire half and the defense was showing signs of
tiring because of all those 3-and-outs.
And that was not an unusual happening. In the bowl loss to Oregon, Simms took
the Longhorns on long back-to-back scoring drives in the second quarter, but
the Horns generated little offense in the first and third quarters.
I could cite other examples, because there are plenty to cite, but Simms is a
year older and wiser and so are the receivers, who performed better last
season than any of us have a right to expect true freshmen to perform.
A bigger, stronger tailback also will be able to pick up more of those
third-and-short downs than the team did last year.
Defensively, eight starters return from an outstanding unit.
The Longhorns lost two great defensive tackles, but the power teams in the
Southern Division of the Big 12 rely a lot more on the pass than they do on
the run, and the tackles UT will play this year are quicker and might supply
a better pass rush.
Defensive coordinator Carl Reese also made several position changes in the
spring that are certain to generate a better pass rush.
If you remember the Oregon game, the Ducks used quick, undersized linemen to
harass Simms and it worked remarkably well most of the time.
With former DE Maurice Gordon now a super quick DT, and former OLB O. J.
McClintock now a super quick DE, look for the Longhorns to be a much better
pass rushing team in 2001.
I do worry a lot about the Horns' place-kicking, but the coaches are bringing
in several walk-ons and, hopefully, one of them can kick off into the end
zone and make most of the 40-yard field goals.
Even if the kicking problems aren't solved, this is a team with enough
weapons, offensively and defensively, to be a top 10 team.
No one in the college ranks will be better or deeper at the receiving
positions, particularly when the tight ends are added to the mix, and few
teams will have better defensive secondaries.
The offensive line will be one of the best pass-blocking lines in the Big 12,
and the defensive line, despite having two new tackles, also will be one of
the league's best.
Here's the way I see the Big 12 South race winding up, and, briefly, why I
place each team at its particular spot:
1. Texas - Too many big play guys for the other teams to stop.
2. Oklahoma - Defending national champs could do it again if they can find
another great QB.
3. Texas Tech - Big passing game too tough for everyone in South but Texas
and Oklahoma.
4. Texas A&M - Even R. C. Slocum says the Ags "will not dazzle anyone with
talent."
5. Oklahoma State - Team has too many holes and too tough a schedule to do
any better.
6. Baylor - Bears still find Big 12 a tough row to hoe with little offense
and overworked defense.
Nebraska should win the North, mainly because the Huskers host the big game
with Kansas State.
The Southern Division teams have beaten the North three times in the five
championship games and I think Texas or Oklahoma will make it four this year.
The  South is a lot stronger than the folks ) and particularly the pundits )
in the North think, and it's getting stronger every year.

900 Number Updated Frequently

I update my 900 number at least twice a week with football and football
recruiting news. The number is 1-900-288-8839. It costs $1.59 a minute. You
must be 18 or older to call.

UT Starts Another Great Recruiting Year with First Pledge

The Longhorns have three great recruiting classes in succession, and they
made a good start on a fourth earlier this month when outstanding Brownwood
junior OL Bret Valdez. 6-4, 310, 5.1, confirmed he has committed to the UT
coaches.
Valdez, one of the state's great run blockers, said he went to the UT spring
game March 31 and really liked what he saw.
He said the Texas coaches offered him a scholarship  at the spring game.
"They told me I was the first offensive lineman they have offered this year"
he said, adding that he went home and talked to his parents about it and
decided he wanted to be a Longhorn.
He said he came to Austin the weekend after the spring game and  competed in
the Texas Relays, throwing the shot and discus.
" After I was through competing," he said, "I went over to the coaches'
offices and talked to coach (Mack) Brown and coaches (Tim) Nunez and (Mike)
Tolleson and told them I was ready to commit. I'm really excited about being
a Longhorn."
He said he also was being recruited by about 20 other schools including
Florida State, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Alabama and Notre Dame.
"The first time they can come see us is in May and Florida State, A&M, OU,
Notre Dame and Alabama coaches had all told my coach they were going to come
down and see me then."
But he said they need to change their travel plans because he is firmly
committed to the Longhorns and will tell any other coaches who contact him
that he is a future Longhorn.
"Texas has really been recruiting well every year and I think they have a
great shot at winning a national championship in the next year or two," he
said. "I like the way they emphasize academics, too."
"I think I'll have a good chance to start after a redshirt year," he said.
The Longhorns probably will sign only three offensive line prospects next
February, and the coaches have not offered scholarships to any other
offensive line prospects I have been talking to, so they must consider Valdez
to be the state's top OL prospect.
Brownwood went 11-2 last year, and Valdez was the team's top blocker. He has
thrown the shot 53 feet and discus 162-7.
On tape, Valdez is a very aggressive blocker who has an explosive start that
allows him to make quick contact and then he simply drives his guy backward.
He has the quickest start of any of the big offensive line prospects I have
seen this year.
One of the best things about him is that he is only 16 and won't turn 17
until June 15, but he already benches 320 and squats 600.
* * * *
The Longhorns need a bumper crop of defensive linemen this year, and they
stand a very good chance to get an early commitment from one of the top ones
around at their early June camp.
He is Lyle Sendlein, 6-4, 260, 4.8, of Scottsdale Chaparral, a top DT who is
the No. 1 recruit in Arizona.
Sendlein is the son of former UT and NFL LB Robin Sendlein, and he is the
brother of UT redshirt freshman LB Austin Sendlein.
I talked to Sendlein Sunday and he told me he is coming to the June 4
Longhorn camp.
I asked him if he is planning on going to any other camps this summer.
"It depends on what happens at the Texas camp," he said. "I might commit. I
really like Texas."
He said he also is being recruited by Notre Dame, Arizona, UCLA, Arizona
State, USC and "about 15 other schools.
* * * *
Another top DT prospect who is a strong Texas lean is Kasey Studdard, 6-2,
260, 4.8, of Highlands Ranch, Colo.
He is the son of David Studdard, a former UT offensive line star who started
for the Denver Broncos for about 10 years after his career at Texas.
Studdard told me Sunday he probably isn't going to go to any summer camps,
but he said, "I really like Texas." He said other schools recruiting him
include Colorado, Colorado State, Nebraska, Washington, USC and Missouri.
His sister, Katie, recently accepted a basketball scholarship at Northern
Colorado.
* * * *
DE Larry Dibbles of Lancaster, who has thrown the shot nearly 61 feet, says
he is bigger and also a little bit faster than I have him listed.
"I'm 6-4 1/2, 270 and I run a 4.68 40," he said. He's also an honor student
who carries a 3.6 GPA on a 4.0 scale and has already made a qualifying score
on the SAT.
"I want to take it again to try to do better, but I've already made a
qualifying score," he said.
When I asked him if he plans to go to any camps this summer, Dibbles said,
"I'm going to the Nike camp at A&M and a Texas camp, probably in late June. I
might go to one more camp, maybe at Oklahoma."
He said Oklahoma, LSU, TCU and SMU have already offered him a scholarship,
and said other schools recruiting him include UT, Notre Dame, A&M, Purdue,
Florida and Nebraska.
When asked what he is looking for in a school, he said, "Academics has to be
first. I want to major in something in the engineering or computer range.
"I also want to know about the graduation rate for football players. The
coaches are important, too, and the chance to get playing time."
He said he went to the Longhorn coaches' offices after competing in the Texas
Relays and met with head coach Mack Brown, DE coach Hardee McCrary and RB
coach Bruce Chambers, who recruits the Lancaster area.
"It was nice in Austin," he said. "I'm pretty interested in Texas."
He also said he thinks Lancaster has a chance to make a good run in the
playoffs this year. "We got to the third round last year and lost to Ennis,"
he said. "Ennis won state and we had a lot of young players, so we think we
have a chance to do better this year."
* * * *
Some of the top football players in the state are also some of the top track
performers.
UT CB signee Michael Huff  won the District 7-5A sprints in 10.69 and 21.68
and anchored the 400-meter relay to victory in 41.32.
Another Longhorn CB recruit, Cedric Griffin of San Antonio Holmes, won the
District 27-5A hurdles in 13.75 and 37.76. He also placed fourth in the
triple jump with a 42-3 leap.
There are always a lot of regional qualifier meets between the district and
regional meets and junior RB DaBryan Blanton of Forney had some great times
at the one in Glen Rose Friday, running a 10.1 100 meters and 20.7 200
meters. UT WR recruit Quan Cosby of Mart was second in both races, running
10.5 and 21.18.
Junior RB/CB Edorian McCullough of North Garland, who is undefeated in the
dashes this year, ran 10.36 and 20.89 and anchored his 400-meter relay team
to a win in 41.07 in a regional qualifer meet in Mansfield. Huff was second
in the 200 in 21.54 and third in the 100 in 10.55.
UT LB recruit Derrick Johnson ran a 10.79 for third place in the 100 in a
regional qualifiers meet in McGregor. He has run a 10.6 this year.


look, damn it, they have all the personality in the world and they are not that big.  i don't think you know what a cockerspaniel is.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:08 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

well, i am not getting a cockerspaniel, they are too big, and all of the
ones i have been around are boring.  no personality.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:56 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

yeah i had one.   her name was mandy and she was the sweetest dog and my
dad has one currently and the dog isnt retarded.  all dogs are dumb.  they
are called dumb friends b/c they don't speak.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
NRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:46 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   that was mean.  did you really used to have one?  my friend melissa has
   one
   and it is the dumbest dog i have ever seen.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:46 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   your retarded.  i used to have one.  they are great dogs.

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
   NRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:41 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      cockerspaniels are retarded.  why do you think i should get one of
      those?

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:36 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      i think they are all bark and no bite.  i think they could get their
      asses
      kicked by cats.  they look like they were doberman pinchers who were
      shrunk.  you should get a cockerspaniel.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
      NRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:25 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         no, i am not kidding and no i don't want it b/c of the taco bell
   dog.
      i
         want it b/c it is really small and cute.  i knew someone in
   college
      who
         had
         one and i loved it.  why do you think they are mean?

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:20 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         are you kidding?  why would you want a chihuahua?  those dogs
   aren't
         even
         friendly.  do you think they are cool b/c of the taco bell dog?

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
         NRON@ENRON.com]

            Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:29 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            what's a furry dog?  i have to get a small dog b/c my apt. is
      small.
         i
            want
            a chihuahua.   they aren't furry and they have personality.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:23 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            it depends what type you get.  if you get one of those little
      furry
         dogs
            that you can carry with you everywhere, then i can't like that
      dog.
         if
            you
            get one with personality like a bulldog it can stay at my
   place.
         those
            little furry dogs act like cats.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
            NRON@ENRON.com]

               Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:13 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               no!  you are so mean.  why would you ever want to kick a
      precious
            little
               puppy?

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:12 PM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               only if i have a bad day.  if i have a bad day will you let
   me
         come
            over
               and kick it?

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
               NRON@ENRON.com]

                  Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:06 PM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  i don't know, i can't decide if i should get one or not.
      my
         mom
               called
                  some places for me today but she didn't find much.  are
   you
         going
            to
               be
                  mean
                  to it?

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
                  Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:04 PM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject:

                  when are you getting your dog dog?

   **********************************************************************
                  This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its
      relevant
               affiliate
                  and
                  may contain confidential and privileged material for the
      sole
         use
            of
               the
                  intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
            disclosure
               by
                  others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
   intended
            recipient
               (or
                  authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
   the
            sender
               or
                  reply
                  to Enron Corp. at
   enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
      and
            delete
                  all
                  copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
      hereto)
            are
               not
                  intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
   create
      or
               evidence
                  a
                  binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
   any
      of
            its
                  affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
   party,
      and
         may
               not
                  be
                  relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
   estoppel
      or
               otherwise.
                  Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Attached is the term sheet for the eSpeed transaction.  We anticipate
receiving drafts of the equity documents Friday or Monday.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490
----- Forwarded by Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000 03:20 PM -----

	Andy Zipper@ENRON
	07/21/2000 05:07 PM

		 To: Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Term Sheet with detail

FYI, the most recent proposal...
---------------------- Forwarded by Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron on 07/21/2000
05:00 PM ---------------------------

"Uman, Jonathan" <JUman@cantor.com> on 07/21/2000 01:13:12 PM
To: "Andrew Zipper (E-mail)" <Andy.Zipper@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Term Sheet with detail

Andy
The attached outlines much of what we covered on Thursday morning.  If you
want more clarification on the NewCo warrant concept, lets talk.
Have a great weekend.
Jonathan
 <<eSpeedTS.doc>>
Regards,

Jonathan Uman
Managing Director, Head of Corporate Development
eSpeed, Inc.
juman@espeed.com
212-938-7495

 - eSpeedTS.doc


Please approve Larry May for a trader id on EOL for "pipe options" book for
US gas.
Thanks,
John
3-3230


No exciting news here.  Yes, I continue to hear /see cowboy, and go out with
my friends on the weekend.  Will fill you in later.

Glad to hear you are doing so well.  Look forward to seeing you back.

dp