From: Mark Whitney
TheLaw.net Corporation
Homepage: http://www.thelaw.net
Remove: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm

  By late November folks aren't thinking about legal research, they're thinking about food. Our answer:

--discount subscriptions to TheLaw.net for the month of November by up to 20%
--send you something sharp and something sweet

  Subscribe to TheLaw.net before the end of November and we'll immediately direct the farm families of the Cabot Creamery in Cabot, Vermont, to ship you a pint of their pure Vermont Maple Syrup and a pound of their Vintage Vermont Cheddar. See, http://www.cabotcheese.com
see also http://www.thelaw.net/cabotoffer.htm

?AND SAVE 20% ON THELAW.NET CONVENIENCE EDITION!

  Just $395 (save $100!) on TheLaw.net Convenience Edition. TheLaw.net is a custom legal browser. It is very easy to use. $395 covers you for a year. You have unlimited access to everything. Install at work at home and on your laptop and feel-free to hand the software off to your trusted assistant at no extra charge. And did we mention there's a 30-day unconditional money back guarantee.

  Our Small Office Special is on sale, too, and the prices for multi-user Workgroups look even more attractive. See, http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

  Of course, our large competitors' databases have been a work in progress for generations. But, times have changed. A judicial opinion does not take on greater precedential value merely because it's fed to you via a WestLaw pipeline. It just costs more to read it. If you take a look at the searchable case law database you'll have UNLIMITED access to with TheLaw.net we stack up quite nicely, particularly when you consider the price.
See, http://www.thelaw.net/caselawgrid.htm

  By deploying TheLaw.net in your world you may discover that:

----your online productivity increases ten fold
----the list of expensive subscription items is much shorter
----it makes sense to turn to the big guns only when you cannot otherwise find the answer elsewhere, faster, cheaper.

?UNRESOLVED MANAGEMENT ISSUES

  Are you one of the select few who wants for little or nothing, or are you in a pick-and-choose mode with the overwhelming majority of your colleagues when it comes to choosing legal research resources?

     --What do you do when you have to research across state lines?

     --What do you do with a Federal question that properly demands a national look across all thirteen Federal circuits?

     --Our subscribers snicker to themselves, click a checkbox to search all states or all Federal and they pay not one thin additional dime for the privilege. (See covered jurisdictions listed below the signature line.)

"I AM IN MY SWEATS DOING BILLABLE RESEARCH. I LOVE IT!"

     And there you have our new favorite quote, from a new subscriber leaving a large firm to start her own thing. We have others; lots of them. See, http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm

     What's not to like?

--TheLaw.net is less than $1 a day for an individual annual subscription to our Solo Edition. Even less per day, per workgroup user. See, http://www.thelaw.net/susbcribe.htm

--Enter a statutory cite into the search engine, and pop up cases construing that item, in one mouse click. See, http://www.thelaw.net/statutes.htm

--Have a case citation you need to know more about? Find cases construing that item in one mouse click. Simple.

--Easy to use? Do you know how to operate a browser, shuttle through little windows folders and do electronic case law research? If so, you're on your way to being a guru using TheLaw.net. If you don't know how to perform these tasks, we will teach at no cost.

--PERFORM UNKNOWN ITEM SEARCHES: Use Boolean and, or, not, near, within, adjacent, nesting, truncation See, Sample Searches: http://www.thelaw.net/searchdemo/home.htm

--PERFORM KNOWN ITEM SEARCHES: Field search by cite, party, counsel, docket, author, date or panel.  See, http://www.thelaw.net/help/operators.htm

--CHOCK FULL. SEARCH TO YOUR HEART'S CONTENT

--Millions of searchable cases - across nearly 200 Federal and state jurisdictions - updated four times daily - unlimited use - Federal and state statutes - State Administrative Codes - CFR - Federal Register - Public Laws - State and Federal Rules - State and Federal Executive Agency Databases - Bill Tracking Tools - Corporate Backgrounders - Thousands of Practice Area Helpers -  Reference Desk - People Finders - Every Major Metro Paper - Nearly 150 Major News Columnists - and much, much more. (Current case jurisdictions, statutes and regulations are listed below the signature line for your convenience.)

ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION PRICES

SOLO EDITION: $345 annually - you and one machine - less than $1 a day
http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

CONVENIENCE EDITION SALE PRICE: $395 annually - SAVE $100 when you sign up by November 30. Install at work, at home and on your laptop and your paralegal gets TheLaw.net, too - at no extra charge! http://www.thelaw.net/susbcribe.htm

SMALL OFFICE SPECIAL SALE PRICE: $575 annually - SAVE $120 when you sign up by November 30. This is for you, your partner and up to two paralegals http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

THREE LAWYER WORKGROUP: $795 annually
FOUR LAWYER WORKGROUP: $995 annually
FIVE LAWYER WORKGROUP: $1195 annually

ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS INCLUDE: unlimited access, a lack of meters, no surprises, a 30 day unconditional money back guarantee, unlimited, world class tech and reference support. What's stopping you?

SUBSCRIBE ONLINE - 30 DAY MONEY BACK GUARANTEE

     Sign up risk-free at: http://www.thelaw.net/fulfillment.htm or call in toll free 1.877.4.LAWNET with any questions or if you would like us to book your subscription for you.

     Join us today at TheLaw.net Corporation, where the availability of vast resources is not limited to those with vast resources. We'll do our level best to ensure your success - whatever it takes.

Regards,

Mark Whitney
President and CEO
TheLaw.net Corporation
San Diego - Chicago, USA
Toll Free 877.452.9638
Fax: 858.554.0968
whitney@thelaw.net
http://www.thelaw.net
"Information Retrieval Solutions for the Legal Profession"

****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy professionals.  But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to remove themselves  easily and at no cost. Simply go to: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply  to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the email address that you would like removed in the subject line or call toll free 1.877.452.9638. See also:  http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy Statement".
*****************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The proprietary searchable case law database included with your subscription is updated four times daily. However, on November 6, 2001, we did a count of entries by jurisdiction. What follows is a list of jurisdictions, the year coverage begins and the number of judicial opinions and orders in each library. A list of statutes and administrative codes is provided far below.

United States Supreme Court, 1900, 213,891

 Federal Circuit, 1982, 18350

 U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Cir., 1950, 14,345
  D.C. Court of Appeals, 1945, 11,546

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Cir., 1930, 18,350
  Maine Supreme Judicial Court, 1996, 1,558
  Mass. Supreme Judicial Court, 1930, 32,329
  Massachusetts Appeals Court
  New Hampshire Supreme Court, 1930, 9,026
  Rhode Island Supreme Court, 1950, 8,899

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Cir., 1930, 41,598
  Connecticut Supreme Court, 1950, 14,824
  Connecticut Appellate Court
  New York Court of Appeals, 1955, 425,966
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 1st
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 2nd
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 3rd
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 4th
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 1st
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 2nd
  Vermont Supreme Court, 1930, 7,903

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd. Cir., 1930, 35,052
  U.S. District Court, New Jersey, 1999
  Supreme Court of Delaware, 1950, 24,859
  New Jersey Supreme Court, 1930, 44,830
  N.J. Superior Court, Appellate Division
  U.S. District Court, E.D.Pa., 1997
  Pennsylvania Supreme Court, 1950, 146,850
  Pennsylvania Superior Court
  Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Cir., 1930, 62,794
  U.S. District Court, Maryland, 1999
  Maryland Court of Appeals, 1950, 20,269
  Maryland Special Court of Appeals
  North Carolina Supreme Court, 1945, 57,601
  North Carolina Court of Appeals, 1968
  U.S. District Court, South Carolina, 1999
  South Carolina Supreme Court, 1996, 1,944
  South Carolina Court of Appeals
  Virginia Supreme Court, 1930, 18,174
  Virginia Court of Appeals
  W. Va. Supreme Court. of Appeals, 1991, 7,130

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Cir., 1930, 80,543
  Louisiana Supreme Court, 1980, 57,879
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit
  U.S. District Court, N. Mississippi, 1997
  Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954, 17,890
  Mississippi Court of Appeals
  Texas Supreme Court, 1950, 109,548
  Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
  Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Cir., 1930, 56,247
  Kentucky Supreme Court, 1945, 22,235
  Kentucky Court of Appeals
  Michigan Supreme Court, 1930, 75,322
  Michigan Court of Appeals
  Ohio Supreme Court, 1950, 42,660
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 6th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 7th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 9th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 12th District
  Tennessee Supreme Court, 1950, 47,199
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, M. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, E. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, W. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App., M. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. E. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. W. Grand Div.

U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Cir., 1930, 39,924
  Illinois Supreme Court, -1985, 31,813
  Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 5th District
  Indiana Supreme Court, 1940, 41,931
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Indiana Tax Court
  Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1945, 27,871
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Cir., 1930, 47,131
  Arkansas Supreme Court, 1957, 23,949
  Arkansas Court of Appeals
  Iowa Supreme Court, 1995, 3,746
  Iowa Court of Appeals
  Minnesota Supreme Court, 1930, 42,152
  Minnesota Court of Appeals
  Missouri Supreme Court, 1960, 53,104
  Missouri Court of Appeals
  Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965, 13,926
  Nebraska Court of Appeals
  U.S. District Court, North Dakota, 1999
  North Dakota Supreme Court, 1930, 8,672
  North Dakota Court of Appeals
  South Dakota Supreme Court, 1965, 5,424

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Cir., 1941, 73,974
  Alaska Supreme Court, 1960, 8,009
  Alaska Court of Appeals
  Arizona Supreme Court, 1930, 21,928
  Arizona Court of Appeals, 1st Division
  Arizona Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
  U.S. District Court, Central, California, 1998
  California Supreme Court, 1930, 107,137
  California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 3rd Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 6th Appellate Dt.
  Hawaii Supreme Court, 1930, 7,116
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
  Idaho Supreme Court, 1965, 7,948
  Idaho Court of Appeals
  Montana Supreme Court, 1993, 2,724
  Nevada Supreme Court, 1950, 7,240
  Oregon Supreme Court, 1950, 71,910
  Oregon Court of Appeals
  Washington Supreme Court, 1935, 52,437
  Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division
  Washington Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
  Washington Court of Appeals, 3rd Division

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Cir., 1930, 33,347
  Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
  Colorado Supreme Court, 1930, 29,715
  Colorado Court of Appeals
  Kansas Supreme Court, 1982, 5,937
  Kansas Court of Appeals
  New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930, 17,135
  New Mexico Court of Appeals
  Oklahoma Supreme Court, 1954, 19,714
  Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
  Oklahoma Court of Appeals
  Utah Supreme Court, 1950, 10,905
  Utah Court of Appeals
  Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993, 1,527

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Cir., 1981, 36,724
  Alabama Supreme Court, 1955, 76,618
  Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
  Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
  Florida Supreme Court, 1950, 114,978
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 1st District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 2nd District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 3rd District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 4th District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 5th District
  Georgia Supreme Court, 1940, 83,838
  Georgia Court of Appeals

*******************************************
ADMINISTRATIVE CODES - ADMINISTRATIVE CODES

FEDERAL

Code of Federal Regulations
Federal Register
Executive Orders
OMB Circulars
Public Laws

STATE

Alabama Administrative Code
Alaska Administrative Code
Arizona Administrative Code
Arkansas Register
California Code of Regulations
Code of Colorado Regulations
Florida Administrative Code
Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia
Hawaii Administrative Rules
Idaho Administrative Code
Illinois Administrative Code
Indiana Administrative Code
Iowa Administrative Code
Code of Maine
Code of Maryland Regulations
Code of Massachusetts Regulations
Michigan Administrative Code
Minnesota Rules
Missouri Code of State Regulations
Nebraska Administrative Code
Nevada Administrative Code
New Hampshire Administrative Rules
New York Rules and Regulations
North Carolina Administrative Code and Rules
Ohio Administrative Code
Oregon Administrative Rules
The Pennsylvania Code
South Carolina Code of Regulations
South Dakota Register
Tennessee Rules and Regulations
Texas Administrative Code
Utah Administrative Code
Virginia Administrative Code
Washington Administrative Code
West Virginia Code of State Rules
Wisconsin Administrative Code and Register


That job I passed on your resume to in our group, I checked, and they still
haven't started interviewing people yet, since Barbara is on vacation
dropping her daughter off at college.


Clem:

After our legal credit meeting yesterday, we noted that the following
guaranties have not yet been executed:

Mieco Inc.
Cinergy Marketing & Trading, LLC
The Wiser Oil Company

Would you please let me know when these will be executed?  Thanks.  Sara


Sally/Janet - I wanted to forward Christine's resume to you for review.  I have asked her to set up a time to meet with each of you (or someone in your area) to explore potential rotations in each of your areas.  She is presently working for Rod Hayslett and he speaks very highly of Christine.  He told me her strengths were in the qualitative area and that she is good at quantitative work.  I think she would be a good fit in either one of your groups/business units.  Thanks.  Ted

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Milliner, Christine
Sent:	Monday, May 14, 2001 5:12 PM
To:	Bland Jr., Ted C.
Cc:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	Analyst Rotation

Mr. Bland,

I am currently working as an analyst under Rod Haslett in ETS finance and accounting.  I am up for rotation at the end of this month, and would like to meet with you to discuss opportunities within the analyst program where my skills might be a fit.  My resume is attached for your review.  I appreciate your time and consideration.

Thank you,
Christine

 << File: Christine Milliner resume, May 2001.rtf >>


take a look
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001 09:08 AM -----

	Jeffrey A Shankman
	02/07/2001 08:30 AM

		 To: Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON, Thor Lien/OSL/ECT, Paul Quilkey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 bcc:
		 Subject:

As Mike and I look across all of our business units, we continue to look for
optimal organizational structures that will enable each business unit to
achieve it's targets for  2001 and beyond.  In our weather business, there
appears to be a lack of seamlessness.  Reporting relationships, P&L, and
vision for this business are not best alligned as this business exists
today.

Mike and I would like to address this as follows:  all employees in the
weather business will now become full time employees of EGM and report to
Mark Tawney.  We need 100% full time dedication from each of these employees
in the weather business.  It is obvious that the organizations and product
lines can lever each other and the synergies will provide powerful results in
our regional gas and power businesses in particular.

If you look at coal, lng, equities, etc, we have employees based in each of
your regions who report back into the appropriate business unit within EGM.
This restructure will similarly align weather.


FYI...

Article Title:
"Governor in energy dilemma"

The URL is:
http://www.oaklandtribune.com/s-ASP-Bin/ReformatSQLIndex.ASP?puid=490&spuid=49
0&indx=584642&article=on

This article provided courtesy of The Oakland Tribune -
http://www.oaklandtribune-ang.com


Ok, Alisha and I will work on it and advise.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thorne, Judy
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:37 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra; Mahabir, Alisha
Subject:	GISB status update

Debra,

I would like to take you up on your offer from yesterday to get a regular status update for the GISB negotiations. If you don't mind sending me a copy of you status sheet on a weekly basis, I would appreciate it.

Thanks,
Judy


Peterman,
DP&L called.. they are having trouble checking out a deal from October 5th.  They sounded all twisted off so I told them that you would call them Monday..

The guys name is Dave Antonides @ 937-331-4576


Scott Govenar, our outside lobbyist,  (916.448.8240) and Mike Day, our
outside counsel, might also be useful resources for you, John.

Best,
Jeff

	John Neslage@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/16/2001 03:44 PM

		 To: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: California Legislation Info

Hey Leslie:

Sandi McCubbin told me that I should consult with you.  I am compiling
information on legislation being considered in California as a result of the
electrcity crisis for two main  purposes.  First, I need it for Steve Kean's
briefing book as he is scheduled to meet with a federal legislative panel in
California (Tauzin and Barton, +6 other Congressmen) on Wednesday, and
second, I am going  to compile info on emergency legislation and CPUC
proceedings in a central place for  knowledge management purposes.

Can you email me whatever information you may have on California
legislation?  I would greatly appreciate it.  I will also give you a call to
follow up.   Steve's leaving on Tuesday at Noon, so I need to get info
together well before then.

Thanks

John


I changed the demand charge for Equitrans k#270 on the Aug and Sep
worksheet.  Would you let me know what the capacity deal tickets are and I
will change Sitara as well.

thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 07/03/2001 10:59 AM ---------------------------
From:	Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/03/2001 10:37 AM
To:	Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	LV valley endures blackouts

  Now here's an "unintended" consequence:  price caps cause less supply to be available (marketers cannot sell above cap and generators must be subject to cost filings if they do) and the result is black outs.

Alan

 Tuesday, July 03, 2001
Copyright ? Las Vegas Review-Journal

POWER SHORTAGES: LV valley endures blackouts
Utility officials expect supplies to stay tight as hot weather continues this week

By JOHN G. EDWARDS
REVIEW-JOURNAL

The first rolling blackouts in Southern Nevada history hit the Las Vegas Valley on Monday with a speed that surprised even Nevada Power Co.

The utility company declared a red alert and initiated rolling blackouts that left an estimated 10,000 customers without power. It had reported 70,000 customers were affected but later revised the number of customers who lost electricity.

The blackouts started at 4:10 p.m. and ended at 4:55 p.m., the utility said.

Nevada Power attributed the power shortages to several factors: unusually high temperatures for this time of year, three generation unit outages, the area's rapid growth, power shortages in California and, possibly, the wholesale power price caps that federal regulators imposed last month.

"What killed us was the temperature was unbelievable," said Paul Heagan, vice president of Sierra Pacific Resources, the holding company for Nevada Power. The Las Vegas temperature soared to a near-record 114 degrees.

As for the rest of the week, "power (supply) is going to be tight," Heagan said. "The prospects this week are kind of tough to call."

The company logged record demand for power: 4,421 megawatts at 5:05 p.m. Monday. The previous all-time high was 4,325 megawatts on Aug. 1. A megawatt is roughly the amount of power needed to supply 750 houses.

By contrast, on July 2 last year, the utility hit 3,300 megawatts when the temperature was 107 degrees, Heagan said.

The company targeted nonemergency areas for Monday's rolling blackouts, which affected mostly residential customers.

Nevada Power spokesmen declined to identify the affected areas even after the emergency was over. Witnesses said power went out in one area of the Northwest and one area of the east valley.

Electricity customers in the affected areas said the blackouts lasted between 20 and 45 minutes.

Several traffic signals went out, including those at the intersections of Buffalo Drive and Lake Mead Boulevard, Tenaya Way and Lake Mead, and Boulder Highway at U.S. Highway 95. Las Vegas Police Department officials reported few traffic problems because of the blackouts.

For the most part, people reported few problems.

"We only had a few customers, and we couldn't do Western Union transactions without a computer, but with the other customers we just winged it," said Michelle Hitt, a customer service representative at Mail Boxes Etc., 7500 W. Lake Mead Blvd. Hitt said power at his store was out about 45 minutes.

Across the street, an assistant manager for the Vons supermarket at 7530 W. Lake Mead Blvd. said customers could not check out when the store's power turned off.

The Roadhouse Grill at Lake Mead Boulevard and Tenaya Way was shut down for about 25 minutes shortly after 4 p.m., restaurant manager Kim Tuerk said.

"We had to evacuate the building because of health department and fire codes, but it was no big deal," he said.

Heagan said Nevada Power will start its rolling blackouts in other areas of the valley if it needs to cut power again this week.

The utility's policy calls for no notification to areas that will lose power, unlike California, where a minimum of 24 hours notice is required.

Nevada Power fears that notification would be used by burglars to locate unoccupied houses during the emergency.

Tim Hay, state consumer advocate, said he thinks customers in affected areas should be notified of possible outages. "They need to provide notice to affected areas, at least in general areas" to help people prepare, Hay said.

Elsewhere in the valley, consumers and businesses continued operating normally during the emergency.

Meadows mall General Manager Frank Wheat said power was not affected at the shopping center.

"We know rolling blackouts can occur," he said. "We do have backup generators for emergency lighting during hours of darkness, but not for all the stores."

Spokespeople at University Medical Center and Sunrise Hospital also said they were not affected by Monday's blackouts and have their own backup power supplies.

Minta Albietz, vice president of maternal-child services at Sunrise:

"We have our own little power plant in the back. We can generate our own power for 30 days, longer as long as we have fuel."

The company said its power woes began Friday when it internally declared a yellow alert and warned employees that it was running short of power, Heagan said.

On Friday, Nevada Power customers were pulling down 4,300 megawatts, the second- or third-highest peak in the company history, he said.

Meanwhile, one of Nevada Power's electrical generation units at the Reid Gardner site 50 miles north of Las Vegas has been down since Friday because of a leaking boiler, he said. Also, Southern California Edison, which operates the Mohave Generating Station at Laughlin for several utilities, notified the company Friday that two of Nevada Power's units were down.

Nevada Power said it was able to obtain additional power on the spot market and avoid blackouts last week and did not need to seek any power use curtailment by major users.

The yellow alert continued through the weekend, a period when electric consumption usually declines because businesses are closed and many people are driving around.

The company made arrangements to buy another 250 megawatts of electricity Monday when most businesses reopened. "That got eaten up by early afternoon," Heagan said.

The utility said casinos reduced about 50 megawatts by switching to backup generators and starting conservation measures. But several Strip casino operators said they received no requests to conserve power or to turn on their backup generation units.

"Nevada Power hasn't asked us to shed (power) load," said Debbie Munch, Park Place Entertainment spokeswoman. "They asked us to cut our power usage a couple of times last summer, and we did so. If they do ask us, we'll do what we can to help the community."

Mandalay Resort Group and MGM Mirage executives said they were not asked to cut their power use Monday.

"Our facilities guys said nobody's asked us for anything, and we haven't done anything," said Fred Lewis, Aladdin spokesman.

"At first glance, it appears the problem was handled very well," said Don Soderberg, chairman of the Public Utilities Commission, which regulates Nevada Power.

"It's always hard to predict when we're going to have abnormal temperatures, and power plants are going to go off-line," Soderberg said. The situation, he added, "underlines the need to build more power plants."

Monday's 114-degree high was one degree shy of the record for the date. The heat follows the warmest May on record, said Joe Nemeth, a senior forecaster with the National Weather Service. Temperatures are expected to stay warm but tapering off as the week progresses and the risk for thunderstorms increases, meteorologists reported.

Highs will stay in the triple-digit range, but drop to 110 degrees today, 105 on Wednesday, 106 on Thursday and 103 on Friday. A less than 20 percent chance for rain exists today, a chance that increases to 30 percent Wednesday.

Forecasters expect a 40 to 50 percent chance of rain the rest of the week.

This story is located at:
http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2001/Jul-03-Tue-2001/news/16458159.html


Thank you, dahling, for the lovely card.  I'm thinking of you as well (but I
ALWAYS think of you).  I'll be thinking of you when I am in New York and
especially when I pass by Ferragamo.  And when I pass by Tiffany's.  I hope
your day is filled with valentines.  Love,  Sas


I have  enclosed, for your review, a draft of the prepared rebuttal testimony
of Rick  Counihan (GreenMountain.com) on behalf of the Core Aggregator
Group.?  Please provide any comments on this testimony to me (John Leslie) by
the end of  business on Wednesday, May 17.? Thank you.?? --John  Leslie
?
?
?
?

**************

CONFIDENTIAL

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps  LLP
600 West Broadway
Suite 2600
San Diego, CA 92101-3391
(619)  236-1414

The information contained in this electronic mail  transmission is
confidential and intended to be sent only to the stated  recipient of the
transmission.? It may therefore be protected from  unauthorized use or
dissemination by the attorney-client and/or attorney  work-product
privileges.? If you are not the intended recipient or the  intended
recipient's agent, you are hereby notified that any review, use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.? You are also asked to notify us immediately by telephone and  to
return the original document to us immediately by mail at the address
above.? Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cherry, Brian - TPBKC  [mailto:BCherry@sempra.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 7:11  PM
To: Cherry, Brian - TPBKC; 'AlexanMS@sce.com';  'paulamirault@aec.ca';
'david.bayless@utility.com';  'Tomb@crossborderenergy.com'; 'Burkee@cts.com';
'Craigc@calpine.com';  'Rick.Counihan@greenmountain.com';
'Jdasovic@enron.com'; 'Mday@gmssr.com';  'bdingwall@unitedgas.com';
'Douglass@arterhadden.com'; 'eke@aelaw.com';  'Jfawcet@enron.com';
'rfoss@coral-energy.com'; 'plg@cpuc.ca.gov';  'johnj@bcjlaw.com';
'Johnson_Pamela@lacoe.edu'; 'karpjos@sf.whitecase.com';  'jleslie@luce.com';
'kmccrea@sablaw.com'; 'jmpa@dynegy.com';  'rmp@cpuc.ca.gov';
'porterdk@sce.com'; 'RochmanM@cubjpa.org';  'RochmanM@spurr.org';
'susan.scott@enron.com'; Betonte, Robert - TP2RSB;  Brill, Thomas R.; Davis,
Robert E.; Follett, B. David - TPDBF; Fong, Ed;  Freeman, Kimberly; Gaines,
Mark - TPMFG; Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH; Hay,  James E.; Hubbard, Lisa J.;
Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; McVay, Nancy W - TPNWM;  Morrow, Rick - TP3RMM; Purves,
Ralph A.; Reed, William; Sakarias, Wayne P.;  Schavrien, Lee; Smith, Anne S.
- TPASS; Sullivan, Glen J.; Surak, Thomas M. -  TP1TMS; Suwara, J.- TPJUS;
Takemura, Earl - TPEKT; Teeter, James S.; Van  Lierop, Jan - TP2JXV; Watson,
Steven - TP2SAW; Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW;  Barker, David - TPDTB;
'How-Downing, Lindsey'; 'Jun, Christine'; 'Gileau,  Pat'; 'Khoury, Dexter';
'ack@aelaw.com'; Nelson, Eric B. - TPEBN; Bisi, David  - TP1DMB; Mumford,
Joel - TP4JDM; Tom, Gwoon - TPGYT; Suwara, J.- TPJUS;  Wright, Gillian -
TP1GXW; Mumford, Joel - TP4JDM; Teeter, James S.; Scott,  Addis B.
Subject: FW: Lad Lorenz's Prepared Rebuttal  Testimony
Importance: High
Sensitivity:  Confidential

Attached for your review and comment  is the rebuttal testimony of Lad
Lorenz.? Please contact Lad direct (213  244-3820 or llornz@socalgas.com)
with your comments no later than COB  Tuesday.

???????
??????? <<RebuttalTestimony051200.doc>>

 - 0516 Counihan Rebuttal Testimony.doc


Friends:

The NYMEX will be open for a normal trading day today, closing at 2:30 p.m. EST.
The market
will remain closed Monday December 24 and Tuesday December 25.  NYMEX ACCESS
will
reopen the evening of the 25th at 7:00 p.m.  The Exchange will reopen Wednesday
morning the 26th
at 10:00 a.m. EST.

Happy Holidays!!

BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.

Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.

L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
	----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.

Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.

The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


-----Original Message-----
From:  Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On
Behalf Of Donna Lowry- (Sr. Director RAC Compliance)@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:47 PM
To: PG&E List@ENRON
Subject: PG&E BANKRUPTCY CASE-- IMPORTANT

As you may be aware, Enron Corp. is a member of the Official Unsecured
Creditors' Committee appointed in the Pacific Gas and Electric Company
bankruptcy case. Michael Tribolet with the Risk Assessment and Control Group
is Enron's designated representative on the committee and he is being
assisted by Lisa Mellencamp in the Enron North America Corp. legal group.
Please be advised that they will be restricted from disclosing certain of the
information that they receive.

Attached are Ethical Wall Procedures regarding confidential information that
Enron may receive as a member of the committee. It is important that you read
the procedures promptly, print the Employee Certification attached and sign
and return the Employee Certification to the Compliance Department as
directed.


Start Date: 1/11/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Mark

Can you tell me if this is a legal document.  This is personal so only if you
have 2 free minutes.

Thanks John
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 12/17/2000
05:21 PM ---------------------------

"Jeff Howe" <jhowe@targetnet.com> on 12/15/2000 11:59:00 AM
To: <lavorato@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: TargetNet

John :

Ted Jarvis asked me to send this to you.

Jeff Howe
Chief Financial Officer
TargetNet
416-306-0466 x945 [please feel free to call me with any questions]

 - targetnet subscription agreement v.2.DOC


Are you approving this for financial trading?  Per our conversations last
week, I thought it would not meet the eligible swap participant criteria.
Let me know....
--------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/09/99 09:39 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Samuel Schott                           12/08/99 06:01 PM

To: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amelia Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EOL Credit Approvals - New EOL Counterparty setup in Global

Draig Energy Ltd. - CP/ID# 72516

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(Global CounterParty_Enron NA)


Tod, Scott,

I would like to set up a time when the three of us can meet to discuss my
mid-year review.  I was told by HR that I was to initiate the dialogue and
get the process rolling.  Let me know when you will be available.  I would
like to meet sometime within the next two weeks.

Thanks,

Rob Brown
Associate
Enron Broadband Services
Office: 713.853.9702
Cell: 713.303.4497
mailto:rob_brown@enron.net


fyi
 -----Original Message-----
From:  "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22JOHN+20G+20KLAUBERG+22+20+3CJKLAUBER+40LLGM+2ECOM+3E+40E
NRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 5:01 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Cc: CARL A. EKLUND; JAMES L. HUEMOELLER
Subject: Fwd: PGE

Michael:  as you know, one of my SF bankruptcy partners, Ben Young, attended
the PG&E hearing today.  Here is a quick synopsis.  Could you please
distribute as appropriate.  John

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 15:46:25 -0400
From: "BENNETT G. YOUNG" <BYOUNG@LLGM.COM>
To: ceklund@llgm.com, "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>, "JAMES L.
HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM>
Subject: PGE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline

I attended the hearings on PGE's two cash collateral motions today.  Both
were granted on an interim basis.  The court set a final hearing for May 9 at
9:30 am.  PGE is to file its pleadings by April 20 and any opposition is due
by May 4.

The bondholder cash collateral motion was heard first.  There was no
opposition and the bond trustee (Bank of New York) consented to the relief.
BONY and PGE are working on a final cash collateral stipulation.

Next was the gas supplier motion.  PGE mentioned in its presentation that the
basis of the pre-petition agreement was the waiver of termination rights in
the event of bankruptcy by the suppliers in return for a security interest in
the receivables.  Jim Lopes, PGE's lawyer, mentioned that he had learned a
great deal about Bankruptcy Code section 556 in the last few months.  Judge
Montali nodded his head at that comment.  Montali also asked whether PGE
conceded that 556 applied.  Lopes answered that he did not concede that it
applied, but he was "very concerned."

I asked whether the post-petition security interest was available to
suppliers that were not parties to the pre-petition agreements.  The Court
said that was up to PGE; Lopes said they were willing to talk about it, but
they did not want to grant liens to all of their creditors and hoped
creditors would rely on their administrative claims, which PGE believes will
be paid in the ordinary course.  Procedurally, the Court said it would not
authorize any new security interests on the basis of the interim order
resulting from today's hearing.  Instead, that would have to be the subject
of a separate motion with notice, and perhaps coujld be taken up at the final
hearing.
P
 GE also indicated that it is filing today a lawsuit against the CPUC seeking
a TRO regarding a deadline of April 11 for the filing of certain advice
letters.  A hearing is tentatively scheduled on the TRO for 3 pm tomorrow,
April 10.

There was also discussion of various administrative matters, like scheduling
hearings, entering a case management order, etc.

A representative of a consumer group, the Coalition for Public Power, read a
statement asking Judge Montali to rollback rates and to force PGE's parent to
pay the utility's debts.  The Judge let them speak, but made it clear that it
was not an action item, and seemed generally to ignore them.

The courtroom was packed with attorneys, journalists and members of the
public.  After the hearing, the reporters all descended upon the attorneys
for PGE and the CPUC.  The courtroom is in an office building in SF's
financial district; there were probably ten TV cameras set up on the sidewalk
as well as several protesters carrying signs.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Bennett G. Young
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 951-1167
byoung@llgm.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Redmond, Brian
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:33 PM
To:	Higgins, Ned; Hilgert, Chris; Mrha, Jean
Subject:	HubCo

In follow up to our discussion yesterday, here is the information I am using to describe our Waha HubCo project as it relates to the compression services deal with Unocal.

As you know, we are in discussion with NNG about managing their storage agreement and with Sid Richardson/Transco to develop an "intrastate" header system for Sid Richardson's gas that will also be connected to the Unocal plant.  We need to keep coordinated on these discussions.

Regards,
Brian


Thursday it is.

Dawn C Kenne
10/16/2000 09:24 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Bagwell/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Lunch!

You kill me...good to see you still have your sense of humor!  It will go
away in a few months.  Mark my word!

Let's plan on Thursday!?

Dawn

Robin Rodrigue
10/16/2000 09:11 AM
To: Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer Bagwell/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Lunch!

Thursday or Friday sounds good to me.  Hey, Dawn I noticed there were a few
people from the group missing from your email.  Did you want me to forward it
to them??

RR


revised.

-----Original Message-----
From: Teresa Robertson [mailto:teresa.robertson@travelpark.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:03 PM
To: Chanaba, Nyree
Subject: revised htl itin

                                          AGENT TR/TR BOOKING REF ZNUHAJ

                                          ENRON NORTH AMERICA
                                          CAUSHOLLI/MONIKA
                                          3WTC0306
  ENRON CORP                              INTEROFFICE ETKT RCPT

  DATE:  OCT 03 2001

HOTEL                 21OCT CORONADO BAY RESORT
                      23OCT 4000 CORONADO BAY ROAD
                            CORONADO, CA 92118
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 619 424 4000
                            FAX: 619 424 4400
                            CONFIRMATION: 95683347
                            REFERENCE: A0DAD2
                            SINGLE ROOM KING SIZE BED
                            RATE: *** USD 160.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ENRON CORP RQST NONSMKG KING
         TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL BY 6PM 2 DAYS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL

MISCELLANEOUS         20FEB HOUSTON TX
                      WED   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

CAUSHOLLI/MONIKA  S5C0413R1073

ASSISTANT:ANNA MEHRER 503 464-7698
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED

Teresa

-----Original Message-----
From: Chanaba, Nyree [mailto:Nyree.Chanaba@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Teresa Robertson
Subject: RE: htl itin

Thank you Teresa,

Can we change the arrival to 10/21?  Please.

Thank you,
Nyree

-----Original Message-----
From: Teresa Robertson [mailto:teresa.robertson@travelpark.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Chanaba, Nyree
Subject: htl itin

                                          AGENT TR/TR BOOKING REF ZNUHAJ

                                          ENRON NORTH AMERICA
                                          CAUSHOLLI/MONIKA
                                          3WTC0306
  ENRON CORP                              INTEROFFICE ETKT RCPT

  DATE:  OCT 03 2001

HOTEL                 20OCT CORONADO BAY RESORT
                      23OCT 4000 CORONADO BAY ROAD
                            CORONADO, CA 92118
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 619 424 4000
                            FAX: 619 424 4400
                            CONFIRMATION: 95683347
                            REFERENCE: A0DAD2
                            SINGLE ROOM KING SIZE BED
                            RATE: *** USD 160.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ENRON CORP RQST NONSMKG KING
             TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL 48HRS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL
    LOWER HOTEL RATES MAY BECOME AVAILABLE. PLEASE INQUIRE AT CHK IN

MISCELLANEOUS         20FEB HOUSTON TX
                      WED   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

CAUSHOLLI/MONIKA  S5C0413R1073

ASSISTANT:ANNA MEHRER 503 464-7698
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED

Teresa

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 06:46 PM -----

	Carol St Clair
	05/31/2000 11:53 AM

		 To: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dresdner Bank, Reliant, SG Interests

Rod:

There are 2 open issues on Dresdner Bank:

1. Netting - they are saying that operationally they cannot net across
product lines.  Are you okay with this?

2. Calculation Agent - they want to be the Calculation Agent.  Since we have
no CSA with them, this means that they would be doing all of the calculations
required under each transaction that we enter into with them.
Specifically, the CA does the following:

- calculates the Floating Price and the Floating Amount, Fixed Amount or Cash
Settlement Amount payable
- gives notice of Settlement and Payment Dates
- determines whether a Market Disruption Event has occurred

Also, my notes indicate that we agreed to increase the Guaranty  cap to
$25,000,000 from $15,000,000.  Is that okay with you?  They had initially
requested no cap.

On Reliant Energy Services, Inc., you were going to think about the following
credit issues:

1. Specified Transaction - they want to include physical energy deals.  You
were going to think about this and whether we needed a cap.  They wanted to
amend the definition of Specified Indebtedness to deal with this, but I think
you and I felt taht it should be dealt with in the definition of Specified
Transaction.

2. Cross Default threshold - is 3% of equity okay?

3. On Credit Event Upon Merger, they want to define "materially weaker" as
either (1) being below investment grade by either S&P or Moody's or (2) being
failed to be rated by either S&P or Moody's.

4. On setoff, they did not have the "affiliate" language.

5. In the CSA, they want the collateral that is posted to secure both
financial deals and physical gas and power deals entered into between ENA and
Reliant Energy Services, Inc.

6. In the collateral threshold, they have proposed a matrix of S&P and
Moody's ratings, with the threshold amount being the lower of the 2 ratings.

AA-/Aa3 and above  $20,000,000
A-/A3 to A+/A1   $15,000,000
BBB/Baa2 to BBB+/Baa1  $10,000,000
BBB-/Baa3  $5,000,000

 Also, they have defined MAC  to be going below BBB- by S&P or below Baa3 by
Moody's or a failure to be rated by either S&P or Moody's.

7. In the LC provisions, they have different cure periods for each of the
types of Letter of Credit Defaults that can occur.  Here is a summary of the
events and the time periods for transferring substitute colateral:

- If issuer's credit rating is downgraded - 1 business Day after written
demand by the Secured Party
- if issuer fails to comply with its obligations under the LC or disaffirms
or rejects the LC - 1 Business day after the pledgor receives notice of
dishonor
- if LC fails to be in full force and effect or issuer declares bankruptcy -
3 Business Days after written demand by Secured Party

In our form, we require substitute collateral to be posted within 2 Business
Days of the occurrence of the above events, except for a downgrade where the
time period is 5 Business Days

On SG Interests, you were going to talk to them about certain credit issues.

Please let me know when you can where you stand on the above.  Thanks.

Carol


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lim, Francis S.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:33 AM
To:	Taylor, Joey; Rostant, Justin
Subject:	RE: expiration dates

I believe that we currently do not have futures expirations for both HU and HO.
Attached is the excel where we have futures expiration dates for.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Joey
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Lim, Francis S.
Subject:	FW: expiration dates

Do you have the futures expiration dates also?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rostant, Justin
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Taylor, Joey
Subject:	RE: expiration dates

can i get the futures contract expiration as well for both HU an HO?

thanks
Justin Rostant
Enron Financial Trading Desk.
Phone: 713-853-6460
Mobile: 832-264-6333
Fax: 713-646-3239

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Joey
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 4:32 PM
To:	Rostant, Justin
Subject:	FW: expiration dates

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lim, Francis S.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 4:28 PM
To:	Taylor, Joey
Subject:	expiration dates

 << File: x.xls >>


fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:35 PM
To: 'DeBerry, Jeremiah A.'
Subject: RE: Montana Megawatts I, LLC

Yes, but since we signed the power it seemed that someone else would actually execute the certificate. By the way, it was certificate #2, so I changed the language in the power to reflect that.

-----Original Message-----
From: DeBerry, Jeremiah A. [mailto:JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:33 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: RE: Montana Megawatts I, LLC

Thanks Kay.  I will check in again with Liz Evans at NorthWestern on the status of the Payment.  Were you able to locate the Certificate?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay [mailto:Kay.Mann@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:28 PM
To: DeBerry, Jeremiah A.
Subject: RE: Montana Megawatts I, LLC

Last time I checked I was told that the wire was in the queue.

Kay

-----Original Message-----
From: DeBerry, Jeremiah A. [mailto:JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:25 PM
To: Mann, Kay
Subject: Montana Megawatts I, LLC

Kay,  as you know, today is the "Call Closing"  pursuant to which Enron is required to (i) deliver to NorthWestern the Membership Certificate evidencing Enron's 20%  interest in Montana Megawatts I, LLC ("MMI") along with an executed membership interest power (collectively, the "Certificate") and (ii) pay to MMI $5,065,607 (the "Payment").  As of 4:00 pm EST, NorthWestern/MMI has not recieved the Certificate or the Payment.

Please let me know when NorthWestern/MMI should expect to receive of the Certificate and the Payment.

Thanks.
************************************************
Jeremiah A. DeBerry, Esq.
Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP
399 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Phone: (212) 318-6458
Fax:     (212) 230-7754

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 11/27/01 16:25:34
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
==============================================================================

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.

For additional information on Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, please see our website at paulhastings.com. To send an e-mail to our attorneys, in most cases, our address is composed of conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com. Here are two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com. A directory of our attorneys and a link to their e-mail address is located at the website. If you have any questions, please contact us at info@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 11/27/01 16:33:05
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
==============================================================================

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.

For additional information on Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, please see our website at paulhastings.com. To send an e-mail to our attorneys, in most cases, our address is composed of conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com. Here are two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com. A directory of our attorneys and a link to their e-mail address is located at the website. If you have any questions, please contact us at info@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042116.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: HARBOR
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred:  46.41 / Final:  46.38)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Meredith, please path deal 209359 with 209371 for Jan 31.  This should
capture the meter bounce fee ENA owes Bay State.

Sherry, I don't remember who gave me this invoice.  I will leave it on your
desk.


E236, the derivatives...


Phil,

Yesterday we had our call to nominate the April LNG ship delivery.

We decided to nominate our five day window between April 4 thru 8.  PREPA is
forecasting a 75% dispatch thru that period.  If the dispatch is 75%, we
forecast that we would be running out of LNG about on the 8th.  Typically, we
nominate with a few days cushion against the late delivery date.  We decided
not to have a few days cushion for  the following reasons:

1. We avoid a cash flow shortfall of between $1-5 million (depending on the
ship size) prior to April 16, 2001.

2. Inventory projections are based on 100% power plant availability.

3. Based on lastest loading schedules, Cabot is expected to respond with
April4-6 delivery window.

4. There is sufficient LPG available to cover several days of LPG operation.

5. In the event that PREPA dispatches higher than 76% (and exposes themselves
to SFP), volumes that we have made available to PREPA are priced at
$6.75/mmBtu, which should cover our LPG costs.  Additionally, the volumes
made available would only allow dispatch at about 87%.  We are prepared, if
necessary, to significantly increase the price of any additional volumes made
available to discourage dispatch above 87%.

Although our nomination should take care of a cash flow shortfall in April,
we will have a problem in May (prior to May 17, 2001) unless we receive
insurance money.  If we have a problem in May, it is not clear to me that we
will be able to draw on the DSR as debt service payments are due only in
March, June, September, and December.

Our insurance strategy must now include getting at least a partial payment in
April.  Jaime please undate the cash flow (we will need this to address the
Lenders recent request for an update) and advise us of our options assuming
we will have a cash flow shortfall in May.

Rick


This will confirm that the meetings with Weil for Sat and Sun will begin at 10am. Mark wants the entire team to be present for the Sat meeting. We will decide after that meeting who needs to be present on Sun. I have sent Weil a number of materials, including the 3rd quarter results given to the analysts. We anticipate that Sat will be a lawyers only meeting to discuss the corporate structure and the bankruptcy issues related to the different business units. The meeting will probably last 4-5 hours.

The Sun meeting will include the commercial team. An agenda will be prepared, but most of the day will be devoted to information gathering and brainstorming.


Please read the comments below, and then let Darrell or I know if this sounds acceptable you. Please note the MAOP set points and the shut down timing scenario. I have them highlighted in red below.

Jerry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whippo, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:41 PM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Graves, Jerry; Vaughan, Pat; Pribble, Dan; Arnie Bailey (E-mail); David Roensch (E-mail); Rick Smith (E-mail)
Cc:	Hendricks, Jonny; Hill, Scott; Lawrence, Ed; Ingalls, Todd
Subject:	RE: Set points

This looks good to me.  If you don't have any issues with this we will proceed.  Comments?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ingalls, Todd
Sent:	Saturday, March 16, 2002 2:39 PM
To:	Whippo, Jeff
Cc:	Hendricks, Jonny; Hill, Scott; Lawrence, Ed
Subject:	RE: Set points

Yes, I forgot to get back with you on this.  Jon Hendricks, Scott Hill and myself got together last week and thought this might be a good approach.

The control system does pretty good with control of the units until they get down to minimum speed and that is where we get into problems.  If we get over 1010 psi on the mainline or 2psi over maop on any system we will look at the governor speed and if it is not at minimum we will speed up the process trying to get back to maop.

If we are over 2psi (.2%) and at minimum speed for 2 minutes we will take one unit off line and wait for 5 minutes to see if we need to repeat this and take off another unit.  At anytime if we hit 1015 or 7psi (.7%)over maop we will keep the station shutdown and all units will go down.
1015 is where we will have the pressure switches will be set.  I feel that we should be comfortable with these numbers as we will not ever get over 1% of maop unless we have a failure of the system and at this point the relief valves will protect us.  We will have to have several failures for this to occur.

If you feel that this is a good plan please let me know and we will come up with the programming to make it happen.
We can start implementing this right away and should be able to get it done by the end of the year.  We would  be quicker but we seem to have a lot going on right now.

Thanks
Todd

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Whippo, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, March 15, 2002 5:51 PM
To:	Hendricks, Jonny; Ingalls, Todd
Subject:	Set points

I got busy and I know you probably did too.  Are we making any headway on a strategy?

Thanks,
Jeff


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Bi weekly mtg with Sally

Date:		11/15/2000
Time:		10:00 AM - 11:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


No, I just looked it up in Bankers Trust's financial statement filed with the
SEC on their website, FreeEdgar.

	Bernice Rodriguez
	02/14/2001 12:13 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Deutsche Bank AG/Bankers Trust Company

Tana,,

Does Legal have any documentation on this acquisition?  If so, please call me
so I can pick them up.

Bernice

From: Tana Jones on 02/13/2001 04:56 PM
To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R
Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon
Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Tackett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wendi LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/Enron@EnronXGate, Wendy
Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Darren Vanek/NA/Enron@Enron, Rudwell
Johnson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cheryl
Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E Shivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect,
Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Enron@EnronXGate,
Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgi Landau/NA/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl
Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthew Dawson/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deutsche Bank AG/Bankers Trust Company

As a follow-up to my email regarding the execution of the 12/29/00 ISDA
Master Agreement between Deutsche Bank AG and Enron North America Corp.,
please be further advised:

Effective 6/4/99, Bankers Trust Company was acquired by Deutsche Bank AG.
All financial trading should now be transacted under the above Deutsche Bank
ISDA Master Agreement.  No further financial trading should be done in the
name of Bankers Trust Company, and the 4/16/91 ISDA Interest Rate and
Currency Exchange Agreement with Bankers Trust Company should be inactivated.

All outstanding Bankers Trust Company financial trades were assigned to
Deutsche Bank AG in the ISDA Master Agreement, and all the Bankers Trust
Company trades should be moved to Deutsche Bank.


I thought so. Ill get with him by phone to confirm. L,M
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Jeff:

Here is the short answer.  Please advise if you want a more formal memo.

Electric:  SCE, PG&E and SDG&E are all authorized to enter into bilateral
forward transactions with non-ISO or PX parties.  D.00-08-023 and
D.00-09-075.  These transactions are limited to contracts which must expire
on or before 12-31-05.  Initial contracts are subject to a blanket
reasonableness test (if less than 5% above cost of non-forward cost of
portfolio=deemed reasonable)  but contracts after 12-31-02 will be subject
to a CPUC preapproval process.

Gas:   PG&E authorized to use gas hedges for all purposes (D.98-12-082) but
limited to contracts expiring on or beforce 12-31-02 and limited to $200
million in cost or 800 MMcfd in volume.  We are looking for a similar
resolution or decision for Sempra.  Haven't found it yet, but we believe
they have been given similar authority.

Please advise if you want additional research on this.  What RCR number
should the work be allocated to?

Thank you for allowing us to be of service.

Mike Day


Just a gentle reminder that you have a conference call from10:00 AM to 10:30
AM on Thursday, November 16, 2000, (during the Management Meeting) with Larry
Lawyer and the Bear Stearns people to discuss CHIPS.  See Larry Lawyer at the
Management Meeting for details regarding the call.  Shirley has a packet of
information that Larry Lawyer sent over for your review.

Thanks.   Anita


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2000 04:57
PM ---------------------------

From:  Rudi Zipter
 04/08/2000 09:03 AM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Minal Dalia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil
Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Option Analysis on NG Price Book

John,

Several months ago we talked about the development of an option analysis tool
that could be used to stress test positions under various scenarios as a
supplement to our V@R analysis.  We have recently completed the project and
would like to solicit your feedback on the report results.

We have selected your NG price position for April 4, 2000 (POST-ID  753650)
for the initial analysis.  Attached in the excel file below you will find:

Analysis across the various forward months in your position

Underlying vs. Greeks, theoretical P&L
Volatility vs. Greeks, theoretical P&L
Time change vs. Greeks, theoretical P&L

Summary of your Overall Position analysis

Underlying vs. Greeks, theoretical P&L
Volatility vs. Greeks, theoretical P&L
Time change vs. Greeks, theoretical P&L

Multiple Stress Analysis

The attached Word document demonstrates the multiple stress choices.  I have
included a tab in the excel file that demonstrates the theoretical P/L
resulting from shifts in both volatility and underlying price.

Please note that the percentage changes across the column headers are not in
absolute terms (for example, if the ATM volatility in a given month is 40%
and the stress is -10% then the analysis is performed under a volatility
scenario of 36%)

Thanks,

Rudi


FERC Commissioner Breathitt certainly has a handle on the physical side.  I'm
also pleased that she's advocating
market tools as a means for California utilities to lower their gas costs,
including risk management and
[efficient use of] storage.  I'd like to see her carry the ball over the goal
line here by advocating comprehensive
regulatory restructuring to make full use of all of the tools available, not
only to the utility, but to its customers as well.

Breathitt wants more attention on Calif. gas
Although the energy spotlight has been on California,s electricity crisis,
the number of California
gas issues at FERC is continually increasing, signaling the need to focus on
the gas
side of the equation, a FERC commissioner said last week.
&[T]here is volatility in the gas markets as well as the electric markets,8
FERC Commissioner
Linda Breathitt said at the American Gas Association,s FERC Natural Gas
Regulatory
and Market Issues Seminar last week in Washington, D.C. And the cost of gas,
she said, is the
component that has the biggest influence on the cost of electric generation.
Two issues pending at FERC are whether to re-impose price caps on secondary
market
transactions and whether to cap prices on gas sales, Breathitt said.
In addition, FERC recently issued an order to help remove obstacles to
increased energy
supplies into the West (GD 3/15). In the order, FERC sought comments on the
need to provide
rate incentives for projects that would make additional capacity available by
this summer on
constrained pipeline systems. &I believe that if the commission does provide
incentives, we
should be very precise regarding the activity we are encouraging and the
incentives we will be
willing to consider, if at all,8 Breathitt said.
The commissioner also voiced concern over a California issue that sits at the
state level -
intrastate pipeline facilities. California, she said, needs to assess whether
its intrastate system is
adequate to take gas from the border to its market. &I am worried that where
there is insufficient
takeaway capacity, FERC,s actions to increase capacity to the border may
result in problems,
such as prorationing,8 Breathitt said.
Meanwhile, Breathitt suggested local distribution companies in California
need the ability
to use risk management tools. Policies should be in place to give gas buyers
an incentive to use
such tools, including price hedging and the efficient use of storage, she
said.
But regulators should be careful in noting the difference between hedging to
reduce exposure
to price volatility and what Breathitt called &mere speculating.8 While
hedging can be
used to decrease uncertainty, speculating to beat the market can actually
increase the possibility
of risk, she said.
Regulators in California and other states should look into the benefits of
reducing gas buyers,
dependence on the spot market. &A balanced portfolio of long- and short-term
contracts makes a
great deal of sense when spot prices are at the extreme levels of the past
year,8 she said.


In addition to the EES length in NP-15 for 04-20, we also have ST-CALI length
in PGE3 for 04_20 and 04_21.  ST-CALI is 40 mws long in PGE 3 on peak
beginning HE 7.  We will sell this energy off under ST-CALI's book and figure
out a cost basis later.

Thanks.
Bill


Hey that sounds like a better idea.  I will give the tickets to Shawna
today.  I have them in my briefcase.  You can give me the $$ later.  The
tickets are $40 each.

	kjobrien@duke-energy.com
	11/14/2000 11:59 AM

		 To: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Are you sure you want to go to that trouble?  I could just have you take
them to work and give them to Shawna and then I could pick them up from
her.  I'm not sure that I trust the US Mail that much.  My address is 501 W
16th St, 77008, though if you prefer to go that route.  What do I owe you
for them?  I can mail you a check if you want, or I could send some money
with Shawna.

Just let me know what you want to do.

Thanks

Gerald.Nemec@enron.com on 11/13/2000 06:46:32 PM

To:   kjobrien@duke-energy.com
cc:
Subject:  Re:

It would probably be easiest for me to mail them to you.  What is your
address?

                    kjobrien@duke-
                    energy.com            To:     Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
                                          cc:
                    11/13/2000            Subject:     Re:
                    02:04 PM

You are so sweet!  Only a truly nice person would subject themselves to
someone else's corporate Christmas party.  I promise to lose a few pounds
before then, so I can squeeze into this sexy little dress that I bought for
my Tahoe trip, so you won't be too embarassed to be seen with me.  David
has pre-approved it.  The party is at the Four Seasons Hotel on Lamar.

As for the UT tickets, the only night I'm in town before Friday is Wed
night.  Are you around that night?

Gerald.Nemec@enron.com on 11/13/2000 01:54:55 PM

To:   kjobrien@duke-energy.com
cc:
Subject:  Re:

Hey,

Yes, I am still headed to Spain.  I am actually leaving on Friday, so I
need to get those tickets to you pretty soon.  Let me know what days you
are in town this week.

The 8th works for me. Where is the Duke party this year?

G

                    kjobrien@duke-
                    energy.com            To:     Gerald.Nemec@enron.com
                                          cc:
                    11/10/2000            Subject:
                    01:24 PM

Hey man!  Haven't talked to you in awhile.  Hope things are good.  David
reminded me about the game the other day.  Are you still headed to Spain
for Thanksgiving?  If so, let me know when you want to get together and do
the ticket/money swap.  I'll be in Florida this weekend, but should be home
on weekends after that for awhile.  Or, we can do it one week night if I'm
in town.  Unfortunately, my travel schedule is not slowing down around the
holidays like I'd hoped.

I also have another favor to ask - is there any chance you would go to our
Christmas party with me on Dec 8 if I go?  David will obviously be there,
too.  I'm such a loser that I've had to go by myself the last three years
and that's such a drag.  Let me know if you think you'd consider it.


Tana,
Mark said you may know where the most current form of EOL legal survey
resides in the system.  Any ideas?
Thanks Brent


here is Jennifer's message ....
Sheri
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 10:14
AM ---------------------------

From:  Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny
                08/15/2000 02:43 PM

To: Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Bridge Problems

Beth,
I know you are at the VP level but I thought I would forward you the memo
below.
I wrote it to explain to the EnronOnline Call Center the various issues we
have been having with the "bridge" since they get a vast
number of internal calls when we have a problem.

Please let me know if you have any questions or if I should be funneling
these concerns to a particular person.
Thanks.
Jennifer
3-5824

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT on
08/15/2000 02:31 PM ---------------------------

From:  Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny
                08/10/2000 05:22 PM

To: EOL Call Center
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey
Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Bridge Problems

Over the last 8-10 business days, we have had a some issues on the bridges. I
want to educate you a little bit on what can cause
"bridge problems".

First, what I want to explain is their is ONE GUI bridge application for
users (backoffice users) to monitor the bridge but there are MULTIPLE
systems that EnronOnline transactions can be pointed to downstream. This is
important to understand because if you do not know this ,
it may seem like we are having the same problem over & over; ie "the bridge
is having problems". But in actuality, it is DIFFERENT
problems. Still not good - but at least it cannot be isolated to ONE
problem.

Also, due to multiple systems (Sitara, Enpower, GasDesk, Tagg/ERMS,
Powerdesk) are listening for messages from one EnronOnline,
a "bridge" problem could be one of many issues. Some of which are:

 The server for EnronOnline  messenger goes down (doesn't send message to
bridge to process)
 The Enron network goes down (cannot send message thru bridge)
 The NFS server (Enron main server) goes down
 Sitara server goes down
 Enpower server goes down
 Tagg/ERMS server goes down
 Deal worker in ANY system gets "hung up"
 Huge volume slows down processing time for one or more downstream systems
 Scheduled outage for maintenance on server on weekend was not re-started on
Sunday

and the list goes on.....................................

FYI In the past week & 1/2, the following actions happened, which caused
"bridge" problems.

 Scheduled outage for maintenance on TAGG/erms server on weekend was not
re-started on Sunday (not smart)
 The NFS server (Enron main server) goes down (affected Sitara & Tagg/ERMS)
 Deal worker in Sitara system got "hung up" and servers had to be bounced
 Member of EnronOnline Dev Team changed data for specific tokenised periods
during trading hours instead of end of day
  (This failed deals in bridge for Sitara & Tagg/ERMS)

One thing to remember is you are getting calls from traders & back office.
Traders are calling because they cannot see deals in their
position manager application of their system. If they are gas traders, if
could be Sitara or Tagg system. If they are a power trader
calling, they cannot see it in Enpower. ecetera, ecetera

If a back office person calls, they are watching the monitor GUI and they can
see deals queing/backing up and know there is a problem.

We are working to resolve some of these issues, particularily,
multi-processing tools, as we know the # of transactions will only increase.
Please feel free to email me if you have any questions. I hope this was
helpful.

See below for explanation of problem on Wednesday.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT on
08/09/2000 03:50 PM ---------------------------

KARIE HASTINGS
08/09/2000 02:06 PM
To: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Kinkead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Production Problem

I am forwarding a message that explains the Sitara Production problems from
this morning. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Karie (36759)

At  9:50am this morning a DealWorker process in the Sitara system became
unresponsive.
At  10:00 am it was determined that the EOLBridge in sitara was not
processing new deal requests
and diagnostics lead to an indication that the dealworker was not functioning
properly.
At 10:14, am the Dealworker was forced down and a new one restarted.
At 10:21 am , the EOLBridge began processing deals.

The cause of the is difficult to determine, but indicators point to an error
in the CORBA product we are using,
most likely due to scalability issues of that product and of Sitara. This is
an issue that is actively being addressed.

--Mark Kinkead
3-1961


Hello everyone:

We have moved the Wednesday V@R luncheon from 19C2 to 19C1
beginning today.

Thanks!

Shirley


I assume you guys received this...SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Reinartz/Corp/Enron on 10/06/99
01:46 PM ---------------------------

Julie Featherston <julie@nerc.com> on 10/06/99 10:35:29 AM
To: julie@nerc.com
cc:  (bcc: Sherri Reinartz/Corp/Enron)
Subject: TVA Ltr. to Gent

TO: Board of Trustees

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Mr. Boston requested the attached letter be distributed to the same group
that Mr. Skilling's August 31st letter to Mr. Gent was distributed. I
believe the entire Board was copied on the August 31 letter; however, if
you didn't receive it or would like a hard copy, please let me know.

Sincerely,

Julie M. Featherston

cc: Board Observers
     Technical Steering Committee
     Regional Managers - TVA ltr to Gent.doc


Please respond to The Motley Fool
===================== FOOLWATCH - THE MOTLEY FOOL ===============
                       Thursday, April 26, 2001
benjamin.rogers@enron.com
=================================================================
Editor's Picks:
---------------------
- Pepsi Headed Higher
- Five Reasons to Admire eBay
- Five Days Left to Enroll in Mutual Fund Seminar
- Retail Innovations at Home Depot, Wal-Mart
-----------------------------------------------------------------

                    Close   Change  %Change

        FOOL 50   1,538.76   +4.12   +0.27%
        DJIA     10,692.35  +67.15   +0.63%
        S&P 500   1,234.52   +5.77   +0.47%
        NASDAQ    2,034.96  -24.84   -1.21%

              (Numbers as of 4:00 p.m. ET)
               THE LATEST MARKET NUMBERS
           http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399091

-----------------------------------------------------------------

SPONSORED BY: American Express
Open and fund an American Express Brokerage account before
May 15, 2001 and receive a $75 new account bonus.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=399092

-----------------------------------------------------------------

DRIP PORT: PEPSI HEADED HIGHER
  Judging from its valuation and free cash flow, the stock could
  head higher in the near and long term.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399093

RULE MAKER: FIVE REASONS TO ADMIRE EBAY
  Matt Richey maps out the five stand-out attributes of eBay's
  business that make it the premier emerging Rule Maker.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399094

ONLINE SEMINAR: FIVE DAYS LEFT TO ENROLL IN MUTUAL FUND SEMINAR
  Find out which funds we think are worth your money in our
  newest online seminar. Enrollment ends April 30!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399095

FOOL ON THE HILL: RETAIL INNOVATIONS
  Price reduction is the cornerstone of the retail industry. What
  innovations are Home Depot and Wal-Mart cooking up now?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399096

NEWS: EDS GOES IN THROUGH THE OUTSOURCE DOOR
  Cost-cutting companies are at EDS' door for outsourcing help.
  Opportunity knocks.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399097

NEWS: QUALCOMM POSTS FLAT Q2, LOWERS GUIDANCE
  The wireless technology whiz reduces 2001 earnings estimates
  by 17%.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399098

FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF TODAY'S STORIES, CLICK THE LINK BELOW.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399099

-----------------------------------------------------------------

SPONSORED BY: American Express
Open and fund an American Express Brokerage account before
May 15, 2001 and receive a $75 new account bonus.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=399100

-----------------------------------------------------------------

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399101
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399102
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399103
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399104
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399105

ENROLLMENT ENDS MONDAY!
Find out how to maximize your mutual funds in
our online seminar.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=399106

GET WHAT YOU'VE BEEN MISSING!
Check out our Member Benefits Center for our
latest special offers, just for you.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399107

PAYING TOO MUCH TO TRADE?
Compare online discount broker fees in one click.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399108

FOOL DIRECT EMAIL SERVICES
Unsubscribe, change your settings, temporarily suspend mail
delivery:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers@enron.com

EMAIL DISCUSSION BOARD
Let us know what you think of our email products:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=399109

_________________________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2001, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId: msg-28812-2001-04-26_17-51-08-6426892_1_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-18:03:18(4-26-2001)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/27/2001 09:58 AM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	03/26/2001 10:11 AM

		 To: <smara@enron.com>, <jeff.dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron in Sac Bee

FYI, in case you haven't already seen this:

CalPERS has big energy tie
By John Hill
Bee Capitol Bureau
(Published March 26, 2001)

When Californians complain about energy outlaws romping through the chaotic
electricity market, carting wagonloads of money to Texas, one name often
tops the list: Enron Corp.

But at least one pretty sizeable wagon full of cash has not gone home to
energy moguls in 10-gallon hats, but rather to retired California government
workers on pensions.

For eight years, Enron has had an unusual investment partnership with the
California Public Employees' Retirement System, the fund that administers
retirement and health benefits to more than 1 million past and present
public employees.

Most recently, the two agreed in 1998 to pony up half a billion dollars each
for business ventures in energy companies, including Enron subsidiaries --
although not the one that markets electricity in California.

CalPERS and Enron have, on average, doubled their money each year. That
makes the Enron deal one of the pension fund's most lucrative.

CalPERS owns stock in thousands of companies, including high-performing
electricity generators and lagging utilities. But Enron is one of fewer than
10 companies involved in this kind of venture with the pension fund.

"Enron is one of our oldest and closest relationships here in the
alternative investment area," Barry Gonder, a CalPERS senior investment
officer, told a CalPERS committee last October. "And as you all know, it's a
highly innovative and successful company."

All true, but in California, Enron has been a major player in the
electricity market, and the company and its chairman, Kenneth Lay, a
prominent supporter of President Bush, have become lightning rods for
high-voltage rage.

"Lay pockets millions every year into his personal account and now he wants
us to pay him more," a Sacramento resident asserted in a letter to The Bee
last month. " ... The power companies are reducing power to drive up prices
and put more money in the pockets of people such as Lay."

Enron has been making scads of money -- profits were up 34 percent in the
fourth quarter of 2000. But the company won't say how much of this comes
from California, and minimizes the importance of this market.

Despite the hostility toward Enron, no one has asked CalPERS about the
arrangement, said spokeswoman Patricia Macht.

Even if it did cause an outcry, CalPERS doesn't make investment decisions
based on the popularity of the companies. Even when CalPERS divested itself
of tobacco stocks recently, it justified the decision by citing lawsuits and
regulatory actions that could sour the investments.

In fact, Macht said, CalPERS is barred by its fiduciary responsibility to
its members from applying social filters that are not in keeping with their
financial best interests.

"It's a slippery slope," she said. "If we do it for energy now, what's to
say a month later, a legislator or interest group who has a beef against a
single company" might also demand that CalPERS sell its stock.

At the October meeting, CalPERS committee sessions didn't address Enron's
role in the electricity crisis. State Controller Kathleen Connell, however,
asked Andy Fastow, Enron's chief financial officer, how power shortages
affected Enron's profits.

"How does Enron benefit from that, and what can you do to maximize this fuel
energy shortage, not only now but as we move into the future?" Connell
asked. She was unavailable for comment Thursday and Friday.

Consumer advocates said they were surprised to learn of the CalPERS
connection to Enron.

"I guess it's nice that some folks on retirement income get a soft landing
because they were thrown into cahoots with marauders," said Nettie Hoge of
the Utility Reform Network in San Francisco, an advocacy group. But she
added, "It's a short-term return for a bargain with the devil."

The CalPERS relationship with Enron goes back to 1993, before California
even embarked on its ill-starred energy deregulation experiment.

At the time, the energy sector was out of favor with investors. CalPERS
figured that the reputation masked some good opportunities, and decided to
start putting money in energy, said Gonder, the CalPERS investment officer.
CalPERS needed a partner that understood the industry. Enron was an obvious
choice.

Enron had its own reasons to hook up with CalPERS.

The company did not respond to requests for comment. But in the October
CalPERS committee meeting, Fastow said that Enron has been investing about
$7 billion a year in the energy and communications industries. "So we need a
lot of capital," he said. Cal-

PERS, with assets of $165 billion, is one of the biggest pots of money
around.

Enron could have issued stock for the investments. But as a public company,
it has to worry about showing quick returns, Fastow said. A pension fund, he
said, could provide "more patient money."

As it turns out, CalPERS patience has not been tried. In the initial 1993
deal, Enron and Cal-PERS both kicked in $250 million. By the time CalPERS
cashed out five years later, it had earned an average yearly return of 23
percent.

"We said, 'It's working for both of us, so let's continue,'" Gonder said.

In 1998, the two created a $1 billion fund to invest in oil and gas, coal
and electricity companies -- everything from oil rigs to high-tech
electricity meters.

About $38 million of CalPERS money went to Enron Energy Services, which
sells natural gas and electricity to industrial and commercial customers and
helps them figure out better ways to keep down their energy use and costs.
Three years later, CalPERS sold the investment back to Enron for about $124
million, for a profit of $86 million.

Another investment did even better. In 1999, the partnership put up $80
million to buy some New Jersey cogeneration plants, which produce both
electricity and steam. A mere four months later, a 49 percent interest in
the plants, which cost the partnership $39.2 million, was sold to another
company for $150 million.

Each partner has invested about $300 million so far, with an average yearly
rate of return of 100 percent. The remaining money in the partnership is
expected to last another seven or eight years.


Please increase deliveries into Eastrans to 30,000 MMBtu/dy effective
9/23/00 and continue until further notified.

The redeliveries will be:

7400 from Fuels Cotton Valley
22600 to PG&E


Please send me the Meta ID.  I don't remember it.  I want to make sure we
have covered all of the counterparties.  Thanks.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 07/25/2000
07:36 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Gregg Penman @ ENRON                           07/21/2000 04:09 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Existing Deals

Thanks for the list of existing transactions.  Only one question, it looks
like the list includes only the different corporate entities of NICOR.  Does
that mean that there were no existing transactions with the other Corporate
families, i.e. NIPSCO, CILCO, PGL and NS?

Thanks,

Gregg
---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron on 07/21/2000
04:05 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kevin P Radous                           07/21/2000 11:40 AM

To: gregg.penman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Existing Deals

Gregg,

Attached is a list (forwards detail by risk type) disclosing all the deals
that Darron could come
up with given your parameters.

Glad the risk management group could be of some assistance.

KR
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron on 07/21/2000
11:38 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron @ ECT                           07/21/2000 10:56 AM

To: Kevin P Radous/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Existing Deals


Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001043017.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


I don't know Sabrina Rank.  Please return this request to the person who
originated it so that the Manager section can be completed.  By including the
manager's name, that will help me to identify who this person is, what job
they perform and whether or not the request makes sense.  I have over 400
people in my group, so without more detail on these requests it is not worth
taking my time to approve these.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000 03:26 PM
---------------------------

From:  Information Risk Management/HOU/ECT

Subject: Your approval is requested

	Security Resource Request System
Application Approval
Please review and act upon this request. You have received this eMail because
you are listed as an approver on the original request.
			Instructions
For: 	Sabina Rank
Request	Original:
Application Name:	EOL - Risk Management
Request Type:	Grant
Role(s):	Application Product Data Manager
Comments:	copied request from ARSystem to SRRS System for approval		Review the request
in the Request section at left.
			For more information regarding who the request is for, do the following:
			Click on the name for PeopleFinder info
			See the Further Information section below
			In the Approval Section, select Approve or Reject, enter comments as
necessary and click [Submit].

	Further Information

Requestor:			Sabina Rank/NA/Enron
Manager:
Request Date:	08/09/2000 06:06:07 PM
RC #:	104503	WO #:
Company #:	0413	Priority:	Normal
General Comments:


Thanks for the update. Did he leave his tel number with you? Per

Per Sekse, Vice President
Enron Global Markets LLC
520 Madison Avenue, 28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel:  (212) 715-5959        Cell:    (203) 984-2427
Fax: (212) 715-5950        Home: (203) 655-1069
per.sekse@enron.com    Private email: PerSekse@aol.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Adams, Laurel
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 11:33 AM
To:	Sekse, Per
Cc:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Owensboro Municipal Utilities

Per,

Robert Hunzinger from Owensboro gave me a call this morning to find out the status of his contingent call option with Enron.

I told him that since ENA was one of the bankrupt entities, that it would be highly unlikely that he would get paid if his option were to strike this summer.  His determination period is June 17, 2002-August 30, 2002.

Not sure if you'd like to give Robert a call or not, just wanted to let you know that he had called in regarding his swap.

Sara--I gave Robert you name and numbers in case he wanted to talk to an attorney, or send in a letter terminating the transaction.


FYI -
Susan Covino of New Power Company has successfully at formed a users group within PJM (PJM rules require at least five companies to form a users group that then has the authority to present changes to the PJM Members Committee for implementation but can also petition the Board directly if not satisfied with the Members Committee outcome) to address ICAP in PJM.  The group is called "ICAP Solution User Group" and the first meeting is scheduled for Oct 29.  I am planning on attending.  I assume the approach will be interim changes to ICAP with the ultimate goal of elimination.


Just faxed it to you.


Fundamentals of Corporate Finance - May 24 & 25, 2001
in EB552   Cost:  $700.00

Do need to improve your understanding of Financial Statements?

Do you want to learn how Financial Statements disclosure is linked to Enron
activities?

Are you interested in learning about analysis of projections or
Improving your understanding of ratio analysis?

If your answer is yes, then this class is for you.

For registration, please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website,
http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at 713 853-3057.


Hey ,
I checked on the tickets and she is sending them to me and I will send them
to you.  She mention that they are for the 15th, which is a Friday, I guess a
night game but I'm not sure.  I recall your most recent e-mail as stating the
16th - is that right.  If so, I hope their wasn't a screwup on anyone's
part.  Please let me know.  Thanks
Ben