From: Mark Whitney
Homepage: http://www.thelaw.net
Remove: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm

    Before we explain how we quickly found the answer to a subsciber's tough search question, by tracking down and lawfully reverse engineering a little known Department of Defense web site, we want you to know that between now and the end of the month, you can save $100 on TheLaw.net Convenience Edition. Regularly $495 - now just $395 buys an entire year of unlimited access to everything.

----Hand the software off to your paralegal at no extra charge. You both install at work, at home and on your laptop.

----If it's just you and one machine, our Solo Edition is just $345 annually - less than $1 a day.

----Search a proprietary case law database with a national scope, updated four times a day.

----Find cases that cite to your case in just a click or two.

----All with the security of an unconditional 30-day-money-back-guarantee

----Access every major-metro paper, international news, Federal statutes, rules, regs, the CFR, Federal Register, bill-tracking tools, thousands of forms, executive agency databases and much more, all neatly organized among the 50,000 additional non-case law documents and databases accessible with every subscription to TheLaw.net.

----If you have more than one attorney user to license, Workgroup pricing is published right here: http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

----For a published list of indexed jurisdictions see, http://www.thelaw.net/caselawgrid.htm.

--"CAN YOU FIND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DIRECTIVE 6025.13?"

  All subscribers to TheLaw.net enjoy unlimited, free Reference Support - even to the point where we will quickly find the item for you if it's out there, even ones that are not accessible via the web's best search engines.

  Here's an interactive example of what we mean.

  We are particularly skilled at quickly scraping hard-to-find documents from among the two billion plus public web pages in just a few short keystrokes. Recently, for example, a subscriber submitted, over our website, a request for Reference Support, wondering if we could locate Department of Defense Directive 6025.13. Even our massive pre-configured drop-down menu system didn't include this little known document and our frustrated client explained that he's been searching for this item online for more than two years.

  Here's the process we deployed:

1. We went to Northernlight - one of the great search engines - http://www.northernlight.com

2. We entered - 6025.13 - as the search term, which returned less than two dozen hits from the more than one billion pages indexed by Northernlight:
See, http://www.northernlight.com/nlquery.fcg?cb=0&qr=6025.13

3.  We scrolled down the first page of results and Hit No. 5 caught our eye since the title of the page said: "Department of Defense" and the brief summary text made reference to 6025.15 (not 6025.13, but certainly close enough to warrant a mouse click)

4.  Clicking Hit No. 5, we were transported to this page:
http://web7.whs.osd.mil/text/i602515p.txt

5. We noted, based on the url structure, that we were definitely trolling deep through the subdirectories of a little known, but publicly available, U.S. Military web server. (Note the ".mil" extension in the root directory which identifies U.S. Military web servers).

6.  We used the Find Function in our browser and jumped to every instance of 6025.13 in the document and noted that while the document had been excerpted on this page - it wasn't the official document we were looking for.

7. We peeled back the url from:
http://web7.whs.osd.mil/text/i602515p.txt to:
http://web7.whs.osd.mil/text
pressed enter and received a message that said: "You are not authorized to view this page"

8. So we again peeled back the url from:
http://web7.whs.osd.mil/text to:
http://web7.whs.osd.mil
and received a message that said the site had been moved to:
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives
We happily noted the word "directives" in the new url and clicked the link.

9. Paydirt. We landed on the Defense Department's Washington Headquarters Services, Directives and Records Division.

10. From the homepage we clicked the link captioned:
Directives 5000.1 - 8999.99 which took us to this page:
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/dir2.html

11. Again, using the browser's Find Function, we jumped directly to the link for Directive 6025.13, click and landed here:
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/602513.htm

12. We selected the PDF version, which took us here:
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/d602513_072095/d602513p.pdf

--THE UPSHOT

  After printing the document, we noted the domain from our final destination: http://www.dtic.mil and returning to Northernlight, we entered it as a search term and noticed that the web server we ultimately found had never been indexed by Northernlight. This U.S. military site may well be blocked from indexing robots or it may simply be so new, that Northernlight's spider has not yet crawled the site. No wonder our guy had such a tough time!

--SUMMARY

  This search was particularly successful because within about 90 seconds we found the official version of what we were looking for.

  However, had we NOT been able to find the document using our checklist of efficient search techniques, it would have still been a win for our client. Why? Because we would have been able to all but rule out the possibility that the desired item was available on the public web, saving him hours of hunting and pecking. We can do the same for you.

  And what about cost? What did all of this cost our client? Absolutely nothing. We provide our clients with access to our Southern California Development Center via our software, our web site, email and a dedicated toll free line. The day you subscribe, we become your virtual partner with an eye toward building a business relationship that has teeth. Self-serving? You bet. We're in the subscription business, we want you back a year from now and we want you to tell your colleagues that TheLaw.net represents the BEST legal research value on the market today!

--ASK YOURSELF

----Have you been hesitant to test alternative research tools?

----Are you weary of paying through the nose for case law research?

----Do you have chains around you because you can't afford or justify a subscription plan with the big boys that let's you jump from jurisdiction to jurisdiction without getting hammered?

----Do the bells and whistles constantly being added by software developers render you glassy-eyed?

----Are your reps currently laying the groundwork for more price increases?

  Join us at TheLaw.net Corporation with the security of a 30-day unconditional money-back guarantee and we'll do our level best to ensure your success - whatever it takes. Check our publicly available Reviews and References at: http://www.thelaw.net and then easily subscribe online at: http://www.thelaw.net.fulfillment.htm or call in toll free with any questions and we'll book the subscription for you: 1.877.4.LAWNET [877.452.9638].

  We know you're busy, we appreciate the consideration and above all, we wish you well in the weeks ahead.

Yours in Liberty,

Mark Whitney
President and CEO
TheLaw.net Corporation
San Diego - Chicago, USA
Toll Free 877.452.9638
Fax: 858.452.6249
whitney@thelaw.net
http://www.thelaw.net
"Information Retrieval Solutions for the Legal Profession"

****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the
fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy professionals. But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to remove themselves easily and at no cost. Simply go to: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the email address that you would like removed in the subject line or call toll free 1.877.452.9638. See also:
http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy Statement".
*****************************************************************


Mike, Steve, and Sally:

Attached is a copy of our proposed offer letter for our full-time candidates
next fall.  I would appreciate any suggestions/feedback you may have to offer.

Thank you!

lexi
3-4585

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Warner, Traci
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:24 PM
To: Barnes, Valarie; Davis, Jeff D.; Elliott, Lexi; Franklin, Chenee'; Gandy,
Kristin; Lebeau, Paul; Miertschin, Beth; Coleman, Jacqueline; Herasimchuk,
Alyse; Johnson, Shawna; Lira, Cathy; Martin, Anita; Payton, Patricia; Taylor,
Corina
Subject: offer letter

Team -

Please review and give comments as necessary -

Thanks again for all your hard work.  You are all doing a great job

Traci


California Generators' Shares Tumble on Bankruptcy (Update1)
Bloomberg, 04/06/2001

Bear Stearns's Kevin Boone on Pacific Gas & Electric: Comment
Bloomberg, 04/06/2001

California Generators' Shares Tumble on Bankruptcy (Update1)

    (Adds Enron comment and updates share prices. For more on the
California electricity crisis, see {EXTRA <GO>}.)

     Houston, April 6 (Bloomberg) -- Shares of California power-
sellers Mirant Corp., Duke Energy Corp. and Dynegy Inc. fell more
than 9 percent after Pacific Gas & Electric Co., the state's
largest utility, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
     ``The concern with the generators is clearly that they're not
going to get paid anywhere near (the price) they sold power for to
the California grid,'' said David Schanzer, a Janney Montgomery
Scott LLC analyst.
     Shares of Atlanta-based Mirant, which owns California plants
able to produce enough power to light 3 million homes, fell as
much as 10 percent to $27.70 earlier. The stock was down 94 cents
at $29.96 in late trading.
     Charlotte-based Duke, which produces 3,000 megawatts, or
about 5 percent of the state's power, fell $2.20 to $40.20 after
reaching $38.44, down 9.3 percent. A megawatt is enough to light
1,000 typical U.S. homes.
     Houston-based Dynegy, which controls 2,800 megawatts of power
in a partnership with NRG Energy Inc. of Minneapolis, fell $3.11
to $47.81 after falling as much as 9.7 percent to $46. NRG Energy
shares fell $1.50 to $29.90.
     Calpine Corp., a San Jose, California-based generator and
power-plant developer, fell $5.04, or 9.9 percent, to $45.60.
Houston-based Reliant fell $1.85 to $43.50. Tulsa, Oklahoma-based
Williams Cos. fell $1.17 to $40.70.
     Enron Corp. of Houston, which sells power and natural gas in
California, fell $1.56 to $54.14. Enron's exposure to Pacific Gas
& Electric ``will not have any material effect on earnings or our
financial condition,'' Enron spokesman Vance Meyer said. Enron is
the world's biggest energy trader.
     Pacific Gas & Electric, owned by San Francisco-based PG&E
Corp., and Edison International's Southern California Edison, the
state's second-largest utility, together have losses of more than
$14 billion because they paid more for electricity than state
regulators allowed them to charge consumers.
    Shares of PG&E fell $4.31, or 38 percent, to $7.07. Trading
was halted earlier before the bankruptcy announcement. Edison fell
$4.49, or 36 percent, to $8.15. The company said it still expected
the state to work out a plan to end the energy crisis.

--Margot Habiby in the Dallas newsroom (214) 740-0873, or
mhabiby@bloomberg.net, with reporting by Mark Johnson in
Princeton, through the Princeton newsroom,
(609) 279-4000/taw/alp/p

Bear Stearns's Kevin Boone on Pacific Gas & Electric: Comment
2001-04-06 16:47 (New York)

     (For more stories on the California energy crisis, see
{EXTRA <GO>}

     New York, April 6 (Bloomberg) -- The following are comments
made by Kevin Boone, a bond analyst at Bear Stearns & Co., on the
filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection by PG&E Corp.'s
Pacific Gas & Electric, California's largest investor-owned
utility.

     ``It's obviously a big surprise. I'm not sure it's going to
be the most constructive way to solve the issue, but it may
eliminate the political element of the equation, make it a matter
of law and keep the extraneous things out of the equation.

     ``There really were too many cooks in the kitchen. This will
isolate it, so to speak, and get the parties in a room together
where they can hammer out the desired objective.''

     ``PG&E obviously thought this was a way to push the
negotiations along and create a more favorable result. Going
through the channels they were going through wasn't going to get
them a solution to the problem.''

On Davis' televised speech on the energy crisis Thursday night:

     ``I thought his comments were a step in the right direction.
I thought they were very positive. PG&E was not looking for a
small step. They were looking for a giant leap to the solution of
this problem.''

On market reaction:

     ``Certainly with the selloff we've seen today with both
Edison and PG&E in the equity market, it indicates it's a
potential stumbling block'' for Edison International and Sempra
Energy to reach bailout agreements with the state.

--Mark Johnson in the Princeton newsroom. (609) 279-4017 or
mjohnson7@bloomberg.net/pjm


I got it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


The posted number was a mistake.


Attached is Annex B to be attached to the confirms for Deal Nos. Y49003.1 and Y49036.1.  Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie


Thursday December 13
2002 traded 40.5
Jan traded 41.5 on Watt-ex !
we traded 40.25 jan
Erik


Rick

As you know, the energy sector is facing several challenges: MAE
intervention, rationing, drafting a new market agreement and the like. It is
all happening as we speak.

In my capacity of President of the Brazilian Association of Energy Traders, I
have defended correct economic  signals, have a functioning MAE, keeping
market rules stable, creating wholesale and retail competition, honoring
contract sanctity, and the like. More importantly, that rationing should not
be an excuse for "revoking" supply and demand

Those are not ideologic positions only. They represent, in my view, the best
interest for Enron in the short, medium and long terms.  We have already
agreed on that in a recent Enron executive commitee. That means, I am in fact
wearing Abraceel hat to defend Enron's best interests.

Just two examples on how those principles are linked to our interest (among
many others)

a) By defending contract sanctity, we defended Elektro's contractual position
on Annex V, which sets a formula on how financial contracts  decline during
rationing. Simulations have indicated that our long position, even during the
deepest rationing will offset loss of revenues. On the contraty, w/o Annex V
loss of EBITDA may be US$ 60 million in 2001

b) By defending the integrity of MAE, spot prices and the like, we are paving
the road for Eletrobolt's success.

Needless to say, Abraceel message has been  consistent "across the board".
For example, if one believes on markets, we have to defend the use of market
signals (economic incentives/penalties) during rationing. And prices to
allocate a scarce resource. Also, as a corollary, no intervention in spot
prices, which will, in turn, make our Eletrobolt merchant plant feasible.

I feel very comfortable in defending Enron's interests and wearing my
Abraceel hat. There is a positive synergy.

However, Orlando is the President of ABRADEE, the Brazilian Association of
Distributors. The interests of ABRADEE are not always the interests of free
market (seldom are); nor they are the interests of Enron. For example,
ABRADEE as a group, criticizes the government for changing MAE governance;
they wanted rolling black-outs instead of economic signals; they advocate
caps on spot and the like.

Needless to say, there is a [potential] crash here, with some internal
reverberations.

Today,  the government announced the  rationing plan. It is based on quotas
with an overlay of economic signals (tied to wholesale prices). This is
consistent with markets and what ABRACEEL has been saying on and on. However,
ABRADEE wanted rolling black-outs.  (paving the road for eliminating MAE
rules and setting caps on spot to avoid exposures)

Guess what happened? Orlando is being pressured by his peers to criticize the
plan and kill it. I am convinced that the government made the right decision
(and we helped influence it)

The subject has received a lot of press coverage on TV, radio and other
media. Abraceel has been viewed as one of the champions of market forces.
Last Tuesday, I was invited to express our views to the "Minister of the
Rationing" and I think I was quite persuasive in showing that there is
elasticity in demand, MAE should work asap, intervention was necessary,
government should refrain from the temptation to set caps on spot, etc. Most
of those statements where contrary to what Abradee had stated in the very
same meeting. The plan the Government announced today embeds several elements
of market forces. It was a sudden shift from the plan announced a few days
ago, where market signals were completely neglected. (CERA has recently
referred to it as a "step away from market forces"). And it was indeed.

Internally, we have been managing this tension in a productive way for Enron.
However, the situation is getting more complicated, as tension increases.
Orlando is getting a little uncomfortable because his peers perceive Luiz
Maurer as someone against the interest of the distribution business.

In sum, there is an internal issue going on. I do not want to be a trouble
maker. However, I feel that we have now a window of opportunities to make
things work. (or at least to try to) Our relationship with ANEEL and with the
powerful Ministry of Rationing has been excellent. I feel we should take
advantage of it and put a stick on the ground. That is our culture.

 I think that spending too much time and energy in building consensus among
different stakeholders is not going to lead us anywhere (beside, we know that
we do not want markets). That is what we have been doing at COEX in the last
two years, with no material results. We have remained silent in key issues
waiting for this consensus to happen. This has been the case for the market
intervention. The market is misinterpreting our views. For example, there was
a  press article today, stating that Enron, together with AES, were
dominating COEX and are trying to revert the situation back to the old regime
(stakeholder board). What a gross misinterpretation of our views !!
Informativo Regulatorio #  3 has conveyed  the opposite message and it has
inspired ANEEL to start fixing the mess !! They gave us the credit. We are
still silent on our view, waiting for  consensus to happen.

May be I am in too much of a hurry, because I am leaving soon. But I feel
that we have a window of opportunity to make things happen (or at least
knowing that they are not going to happen any time soon). And we are not
taking advantage of it.

I am not expecting any immediate action from you. Just for you to be aware on
what is going on and  share some concerns.  If you have any comments or any
advise, please let me know.  I have even considered to resign Abraceel
leadership to avoid future internal conflicts.

Luiz Maurer


According to Bonnie White, the time period for Oasis to appeal ends on Friday 11/2.  If there is no appeal, then Enron will file a writ of execution with the local sherriff who will go out to the business and seize property in an amount to satisfy the judgement.  This is cheaper than hiring a collection agency and we retain more of the funds.  Let me know if you have questions.
kh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:54 AM
To:	Hyatt, Kevin
Subject:	FW: Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement

Kevin,

Who in legal have you been working with?  Tracy was wondering when we thought we would receive the money.

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement

Any idea when or if we will receive the money?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Moore, Jan; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	FW: Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement

FYI, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hyatt, Kevin
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Moseley, Debbie; Watson, Kimberly; Cherry, Paul
Cc:	Gadd, Eric; Harris, Steven
Subject:	Oasis Dairy Farms Judgement

Earlier this year I requested that the Enron litigation unit file suit against Oasis Dairy for collection of unpaid transport bills on TW.  The suit was filed in the fifth judicial district court in Chaves County, NM.

On October 1, 2001, TW was granted summary judgement in the case by the court in the amount of $29,250.56 inclusive of back interest and attorney fees.  This amount will continue to accrue interest at 8.75% per annum until paid by Oasis.

If you would like a copy of the judgement, please let me know.

kh


Peter,

I looked at the Banque Paribas Agreement.  It is an ISDA Master Agreement
(Multicurrency-Cross Border) dated as of June 28, 1995.  The Agreement was
executed between ECT and Banque Paribas.  Banque Paribas changed its name to
"Paribas" on May 11, 1998, so I think you need to change the agreement  and
signature line to read "Paribas, formerly known as Banque Paribas". or
something to that effect.  The agreement is governed by New York law.


FUTURES = $403,266,140

Exchange Options have liquidated out of the book.


Check out this link, and then read the story below.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=000625542412043&rtmo=aq4CTWTJ&atmo=99999999&p
g=/et/00/4/20/nmar20.html

 WAKE UP AMER  A, THIS IS WHY OUR
 FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND
 AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION

Where We're Headed
    By Robert A. Waters
****************************************************************

 You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your
 bedroom door.

 Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled
 whispers. At least two people have broken into your house
 and are moving your way.

 With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed
 and pick up your shotgun. You rack a shell into the
 chamber, then inch toward the door and open it.

 In the darkness, you make out two shadows. One holds a
 weapon--it looks like a crowbar.

 When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the
 shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor.
 One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to
 the front door and lurches outside.

 As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're
 in trouble. In your country, most guns were outlawed years
 before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently
 regulated as to make them useless.
 Yours was never registered.

 Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died.
 They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal
 Possession of a Firearm.

 When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry:
 authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.
 "What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.
 "Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing.
 "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven."

 The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local
 newspaper. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric
 vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choir
 boys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say
 about them. Buried deep down in the article, authorities
 acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous
 times. But the next day's headline says it all:
 "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die." The thieves have
 been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type
 pranksters.

 As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media
 picks it up, then the international media.

 The surviving burglar has become a folk hero. Your attorney
 says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win.

 The media publishes reports that your home has been
 burglarized several times in the past and that you've been
 critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the
 suspects. After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you
 would be prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this to
 allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.

 A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been
 reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When
 you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works
 against you. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean,
 vengeful man.

 It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.

 The judge sentences you to life in prison.

__________________________________________

 This case really happened.

***********************************
 On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk, England,
 killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was
 convicted and is now serving a life term.

 How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the
 once-great British Empire?

 It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly
 reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and
 established that handgun sales were to be made only to those
 who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing
 to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns.
 Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of
 any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of
 all shotguns.

 Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after
 the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a
 mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down
 the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared,
 17 people were dead.

 The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun
 control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all
 privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan
 used a rifle.)

 Nine years later, at Dunblane, Scotland, Thomas Hamilton used
 a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at
 a public school.

 For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as
 mentally unstable, or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real
 kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day,
 week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and
 demanded a total ban on all handguns.
 The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the
 few sidearms still owned by private citizens.

 During the years in which the British government incrementally
 took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right
 to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities
 refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened,
 claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to
 own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were
 charged while the real criminals were released. Indeed, after the
 Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We
 cannot have people take the law into their own hands."

 All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and
 several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young
 thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a
 collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or
 stolen by burglars.

 When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns
 were given three months to turn them over to local authorities.
 Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few
 who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year
 prison sentences if they didn't comply.

 Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns
 from private citizens.

 How did the authorities know who had handguns?

 The guns had been registered and licensed. Kinda like cars.

 Sound familiar?

 WAKE UP AMERICA, THIS IS WHY OUR
 FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND
 AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.

 - att1.htm


Sharon Brown
ETS Gas Control
713-853-5660


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 11:45 AM -----

	"Jeff Seely" <JeffSeely_008118@netstock.customer-email.com>
	08/10/2000 11:37 PM

		 To: <sshackl@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: ShareBuilder News - Aug 2000

Dear Sara,

EXCITING UPDATES WITH SHAREBUILDER!
Last month I told you about some exciting things happening here with
ShareBuilder. Have you noticed it on our site yet? We've just added over
1,000 new stocks for a grand total that tops 3,000! There's never been a
better time to consider adding new stocks or index shares to your plan. Visit
http://www.sharebuilder.com and click on "ShareBuilder Stock List" today to
checkout the complete list.

Now you can make dollar-based investments in some of these new stocks.
Here's an example of a few with names you may recognize:

Bally Total Fitness Holdings  BFT
Comcast Corporation   CMCSA
Loral Space & Communications  LOR
Nabisco Group Holdings   NGH
Neiman Marcus Group   NMG B
Pepsi Americas    PAS
Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.  PETC
Readers Digest Association  RDB
Register.com Incorporated  RCOM
Revlon Incorporated   REV
Tommy Hilfiger Corporation  TOM
Viacom Incorporated   VIA

SHAREBUILDER.COM AFFILIATE PROGRAM:
Another exciting addition you might have noticed recently is our new
ShareBuilder Affiliate Program. Web portal sites that qualify to become
affiliates will be able to share the benefits of ShareBuilder with visitors,
and receive compensation.  If you have a business or work for a company that
has a web portal site and would like to provide a great investment tool for
your visitors, your organization can apply to become a ShareBuilder
Affiliate.  To find out more about our affiliate program, visit
ShareBuilder.com and click on "Become an Affiliate".

CREDIT UNION PARTNERS:
I'm also pleased to tell you that we've partnered with many credit unions
over the last few months - we now have dozens of credit union partners. These
partnerships let credit union members take care of all of their finances from
a single online source - from balancing checkbooks, to making mortgage
payments, and now watching long-term investments grow through ShareBuilder.
Two of our most recent credit union partners are among the biggest in the
nation: Boeing Employees Credit Union and The Golden 1 Credit Union. If
you're a member of either, look for ShareBuilder on these sites: becu.org and
golden1.com.

SAFECO PARTNERSHIP:
We also have entered into a partnership with SAFECO Corporation, one of the
leading insurance companies in the U.S. and a Fortune 500 company.  We
launched the SAFECO ShareBuilder last month, which is now available to direct
investors in its mutual funds at safecofunds.com.  This is the first
relationship we have announced with a major insurance company and are
delighted to be associated with SAFECO, both as a partner and as a major
private investor in our company.

CUSTOMER CARE:
If you have any questions regarding your account or ShareBuilder plan, feel
free to contact one of our customer care agents via email at
mailto:customercare@netstock.com or call us toll-free at 1-888-NET-STOK
between the hours of 6 AM and 6 PM Pacific Time Monday through Friday.

Best regards,
Jeff Seely President and CEO
Netstock Direct Corporation

P.S. You are receiving this e-mail because you have a ShareBuilder or
Netstock Direct Account setup with us.  You may unsubscribe, update or change
your e-mail preferences, by visiting the "Account" section of the
ShareBuilder site at http://www.sharebuilder.com or if you are a Netstock
Direct customer at netstockdirect.com.

ShareBuilder(tm) is brought to you by Netstock Investment Corporation, a
registered broker-dealer and a member of the NASD and SIPC.

This email was sent to:  sshackl@enron.com


Form review meeting will be held in EB38c2 on Wed., 5/17, a 9-10:30 a.m.


Please remember that once a master has been executed the status SHOULD NEVER be changed from its "executed" status.  To accomodate the master upgrades and master netting agreements I have added additional selections to the status bar, so you now have the following selections to choose within the "executed" status bar:

1.  "executed"
2.  "executed-under amendment" - to be used when we are amending a master
3.  "executed-inactive" - to be used when a master is executed but we are no longer trading under it
4.  "executed-master upgrade" - to be used when we are doing an ISDA replacement master or replacing one master with another master
5.  "executed-master netting agreement" - to be used when we have a master in place and we are upgrading it to add a master netting agreement

Thanks for your attention herewith.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/02/2000 06:44 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/02/2000 06:36 PM

		 To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Mike Kahn: 415.986.2800.  ext. 205.    Let me know how it goes.

Best,
Jeff

P.S.  And I mean this in all seriousness.....  Many months ago, you were
sitting in our small conference room and said, "The Governor needs to take
control and initiate a negotiation, or summit."  Looks like he finally
figured it out.


I recently heard from David Marshall in the Risk Management Group that we may have made or were contemplating a claim against Ron Anderson of IBC Turbo for misrepresenting the quality of the gas turbines that he procured for us.  Marshall said that you were the person who would know.

	Anderson is a potentially crucial witness for us if we decide to pursue Underwriters on the insurance claim arising out of the failure of the Doyle Unit #1, which is one of the gas turbines that he procured for us and that was located in Monroe, Georgia at the Doyle plant.

	Are you the man I need to talk to?  I know you are underwater.  Is there anyone else who would know about this?

	Britt


Vince:

I'd like to send you some articles on the fleet card business.

If you have some time, I'd like to discuss the meeting that we had with
Comdata (which has a 60% market share of the fleet card business).  They have
some live data that potentially could be very interesting; however, I'd like
to discuss it with you.

Shawn

What a Mess!(Statistical Data Included)
JOHN D. SCHULZ
03/26/2001
Traffic World
Page 25
Copyright 2001 Gale Group Inc. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT 2001 Journal of
Commerce, Inc.
Truckers still waiting for signs of pent-up freight demand; earnings
shortfalls, layoffs loom
If you are waiting for trucking to kick-start the nation's economic recovery,
pull up a chair and wait awhile. Trucking CEOs say they haven't seen this
slow a first quarter in a decade.
"Perhaps the weakest first quarter for freight demand since Swift became a
public company in 1990," Phoenix-based Swift Transportation Chairman and CEO
Jerry Moyes said.
The first-quarter trucking mantra historically has been this: everybody loses
money in January, hopes for a break-even February and earns whatever profit
there is in the quarter in March. That formula may not hold this year.
Gregory L. Quesnel, president and CEO of Con-Way Transportation Services and
Emery Worldwide parent CNF Inc., said the current slowdown was first detected
late in the third quarter last year and has become "more pronounced in each
successive quarter." March, he said, has been "as disappointing as the first
two months this year."
Layoffs already are occurring at the major LTL carriers. Yellow Freight
System has idled as many as 1,000 Teamsters and hundreds of white-collar
back-office workers. Most large carriers are warning of profit shortfalls
that will cause them to miss analysts' first-quarter estimates. But there are
deeper fears, too. Marginal players may be forced into bankruptcy. Small,
family-owned carriers may be unable to exit the industry on their own terms
because of the shocking decline in the value of used trucks that is causing
some companies to be valued at less than half their worth of just two years
ago.
Swift's volume drop-off began with shipments originating on the West Coast in
January and February and it is continuing in March, Moyes said. Coupled with
reduced demand from the Southwest, Moyes said Swift will not meet analysts'
first-quarter earnings expectations. Swift is not alone.
"We hauled less freight in February than February a year ago," said Bob
Hammel, executive vice president of Pittsburgh-based Pitt Ohio Express, a
leading privately held Eastern regional LTL carrier. "The slowdown in
manufacturing began in the middle of last year and it was precipitous. Nobody
anticipated the speed in which manufacturing demand fell off."
Even Con-Way, the most profitable LTL operation in the past five years, said
it would have a decline in first-quarter operating income compared with the
year-ago period. Con-Way's tonnage declines were estimated in the
"mid-single-digit" percentage range.
Roadway Express estimated that its current tonnage levels are running 10 to
11 percent below those a year ago, which will result in an approximately
one-half of 1 percent (0.5 percent) decline in its operating ratio. (see
sidebar)
Pat Hanley, Overnite Transportation's senior vice president and chief
financial officer, said freight figures were flat in February year over year
but rose slightly in March. Overnite is the exception to the LTL industry
with as many as 24 new terminals scheduled to be opened this year.
"January was pretty good to us, but February was flat. It's coming back in
March. We're probably up in low single digits, 3 to 4 percent. We're picking
back up. The economy has hurt us. If you had asked us at the start of the
year, we'd have said we'd be up double-digits," Hanley said.
The national economic picture is "a big concern," Hanley said. "We're not
seeing pressure on prices, at least not so far. We're seeing customers ship
10 pallets a day instead of 20. The shipment size is coming down. Certainly
we're concerned. We'll do O.K., but not as great as we'd like."
Forget consumer confidence surveys or the producer pricing index or whatever
stars align in Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan's world. The
genuine leading indicator of any national economic trend is trucking, which
is always a first-in, first-out industry in any economic slowdown.
To hear trucking industry leaders tell it, get comfortable with beans and
franks for dinner. It's going to be awhile before it's filet mignon time
again.
Shippers see what's happening as well but say it's still too early in the
year for carriers to start cutting rates to fill empty trucks.
"All the carriers we talk with report flat or slightly declining business
levels -- definitely slower than early last year," said Bill Huie, assistant
vice president of corporate transportation for NCH Corp., Irving, Texas.
"With a couple of exceptions, carriers we talk with have no plans for
expansion in the next few months. We are getting feelers about some possible
lane adjustments to boost revenue. But generally it appears a little early in
the economic downturn for much price movement."
The national LTL carriers are seeing the same things. "Our business is down
pretty substantially for the first quarter," said Roger Dick, spokesman for
Yellow Corp., parent of Yellow Freight System and two large regional LTL
carriers, Jevic Transportation, Delanco, N.J., and Saia Motor Freight,
Duluth, Ga.
USFreightways Corp., citing what it called the nation's "serious economic
slowdown," said it expects first-quarter earnings to fall "very substantially
below" current Wall Street consensus.
Extreme weather conditions also contributed to the already weakened operating
environment, USF Chairman, President and CEO Samuel K. Skinner added.
"Traditionally, the first quarter builds momentum slowly, with March being
the strongest month of the period," Skinner said in a statement. "This year,
the economic slowdown of the fourth quarter of 2000 accelerated in January
and February, softening even the normal modest expectations for those two
months."
It's not just the LTL industry that's hurting. The Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
truckload freight index continues to show the worst demand-supply
relationship since analyst James J. Valentine began tracking the data in
April 1994. Two events can cause weakness in the index, according to
Valentine. They are either an abundance of excess trucks on the road or weak
freight demand.
"So far in 2001, we have seen the confluence of both factors, but the
fall-off in demand has far outpaced the increase in supply," Valentine wrote
in his most recent "Trucking Snapshot" for early March.
Year-to-date measurement for truckload demand is down 25 percent year over
year, according to Valentine's index, while supply is up only 7 percent. That
would indicate the over capacity was a significant issue last year but was
"masked by the strong economy," Valentine says.
In a more ominous note, Valentine believes overcapacity will continue to
plague the truckload industry for the next one to two years. Only a
reaccelerating national economy can bring the demand-supply back in balance
for the truckload sector in the near term, Valentine predicts.
The overproduction of new Class 8 trucks from early 1998 through early last
year has put too many trucks on the roads and caused supply to back up at
manufacturers, wholesalers and other retailers. Used trucks have lost on
average more than 30 percent of their value over the past 18 months.
Anecdotally, one used truck dealer, Music City Truck & Equipment, in
LaVergne, Tenn., is holding a "two-for-one" sale on three- to five-year-old
Class 8 Freightliners. You can buy two for around $30,000, less than a brand
new Chevy Suburban SUV.
What that means is a trucker who bought a 1998 Class 8 truck for $70,000 and
depreciated half the value over three years has a piece of equipment on the
books this year at $35,000. But assuming it has lost 30 percent of that
value, it may only be worth $24,500 in actuality. For a carrier with a
100-truck fleet, that equates to a loss of more than $1 million on assets.
The glut may last for a while, according to Valentine's analysis. Assuming a
three-year trade-in cycle, most of the Class 8 tractors in the truckload
sector are just now rolling over to the used-truck market. That means that
overcapacity will plague the truckload industry for at least the next year.
That will result in some of the marginal carriers exiting the business, as
did nearly 1,900 carriers last year that either closed or declared
bankruptcy.
"We can see from indexes, surveys and other information available to us that
it is unlikely there will be any significant improvement in March and freight
demands will continue to be soft throughout the month. Based on all of these
factors, we expect USFreightways' profits for the first quarter to be very
substantially less than published analysts' forecasts," Skinner said.
In addition, severe weather conditions including an earthquake in Seattle,
rainstorms in California and blizzards in the Northeast have added cost and
decreased efficiencies, Skinner added.
Expectations at each of USF's operating companies have been affected, some
more than others. The LTL, logistics, reverse logistics and
freight-forwarding units are all showing decreased revenue and volume over a
similar period last year, Skinner said.
Further job cuts at USF Worldwide, its freight forwarder, would be in the
offing as cost controls at the unit would be "accelerated" in the wake of the
softening economy, Skinner said. Late last year, Skinner said the rebuilding
process at USF Worldwide would be a two-year process. But the worsening
economy has made that rebuilding job harder, he said.
"We are seeing evidence that the slowing economy is, in fact, further
impeding progress in this area," Skinner said. "During the fourth quarter of
2000 and continuing into the first quarter of 2001, the company has taken
steps to increase cost efficiencies. Among these actions are a substantial
cutback in capital spending and significant reductions in the labor force.
These cost-control efforts will be accelerated to partially counterbalance
the damaging impact of the current economic and weather conditions."
In the 2000 first quarter, USF posted $22.3 million net income, a 27 percent
rise from the $17.5 million earnings in the 1999 first quarter. At the time,
that was USF's 15th straight quarter-over-quarter earnings increase. It came
on $608.2 million revenue, an 18.5 percent rise in from the $513.2 million
revenue in the 1999 first quarter. Analysts had been estimating USF to earn
about $3.50 a share earnings for 2001, compared with actual $3.61 earnings
per share for all of last year. In the fourth quarter last year, USF earned
$23.7 million, or 91 cents a share.
                          Trucking in a Snapshot
Market             What's Going On
MSDW [*] truckload Remains in record-low territory, indicating
freight index      the worst demand-supply relationship since MSDW
                   began tracking the date in April 1994.
Diesel prices      Diesel prices in the first quarter of 2001
                   have come down 6% sequentially from 4Q00. However,
                   the average price for the quarter remains 6%
                   above that of 1Q00.
WTI oil            OPEC recently agreed to reduce supply by 5% and
                   has stated a price objective of $25 per barrel.
Capacity           Retail sales of Class 8 tractors (new trucks
                   entering the market) came down in January, but
                   inventory (trucks that will enter the market at some
                   point) to sales ratio hit a new high of 3.4 months
GDP                4Q00 GDP increased 1.1% and economists see U.S.
                   recession in 2001 with +0.5% and -1.4% GDP forecast
                   for 1Q01 and 2Q01, respectively.
Retail sales       Retail sales rose 0.7% in January. While this
                   was better than forecast, the upside was likely
                   the result of excessive clearance sales after a
                   disappointing holiday season.
Consumer           The Conference Board's measure of consumer
confidence         confidence fell again (nine points) in February
                   after registering the largest one-month decline
                   in 10 years in January (14 points).
NAPM               The February NAPM rose slightly to 41.9.
                   However, it still indicates a contracting
                   manufacturing sector.
Leading            The index of leading economic indicators
economic           rose 0.8% in January, while
indicator          MSDW had forecast a 0.6% increase. This
                   represents the first rise in four months.
Stock              After a recent pullback, trucking stocks remain
perfonnance        up year-to-date with TL stocks up 5%, regional
                   LTL stocks up 9% and national LTL stocks up 13%.
Investor           For the week ended February 28, mutual fund
                   outflows totaled $309 million, compared with
                   inflows of $2 billion in the prior week.
Market             Implications
MSDW [*] truckload Negative for all TL carriers.
freight index
Diesel prices      The downward trend is Positive for all
                   carriers, especially TL carriers, which have
                   greater exposure to fuel than LTL carriers.
WTI oil            Negative for all carriers, as $25 per
                   barrel is still 25% higher than the $20 per
                   barrel average since 1990.
Capacity           Negative for TL carriers, not a major
                   concern for LTL carriers, which measure
                   capacity by the number of terminals.
GDP                Negative for all carriers.
Retail sales       Negative for both TI and LTL carriers.
Consumer           Negative for all carriers
confidence
NAPM               Negative for all carriers.
Leading            Positive for all carriers.
economic
indicator
Stock              Positive, however, stocks could pull
perfonnance        back further in the short term as
                   fundamentals catch up.
Investor           Negative.
Source: Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Research


<<Exhibits to Gas Purchase Agreement(Clean).doc>>  <<Comparison of
Versions 5 to 6 (Exhibits to Gas Purchase Agreement).DOC>>

Attached please find clean and blacklined copies of the Enron South
America Facility Agreement Exhibits. The only change is the removal of
Exhibit U.

 - Exhibits to Gas Purchase Agreement(Clean).doc
 - Comparison of Versions 5 to 6 (Exhibits to Gas Purchase Agreement).DOC


Per the note below, Astra Power, LLC is requesting execute rights to US Gas
Financial.  Both credit and legal had denied this access on their original
review.
Please let me know if it possible to open Astra for these product types.

Thanks for you help!

Frank

---------------------- Forwarded by Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2000 07:56
AM ---------------------------

From:  EOLHelp
03/30/2000 05:10 PM

Sent by: Kathy M Moore
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Astra Power, LLC

Frank,

 Astra Power, LLC.  is requesting to have executable rights to US Gas
Financial.  Currently profile is set up for read only.
Thanks for your help.

Kathy


Andy,

As a follow-up to our phone conversation, True Quote is in the process of
obtaining an equity bridge in the range of $1 to $2 million.  True Quote's
current cash position is tight and we need to complete this process within
the next two/three weeks.    Due to the current state of the capital
markets, management feels it is prudent to solicit a small bridge amount.
Once "traction" (EOL link complete, TQTS deal complete, etc..) is obtained,
we will continue to solicit larger equity investments from strategic
partners and the investment community.

I would be glad to discuss the current state of affairs in more detail and
provide the appropriate information if you are interested in pursuing this
opportunity.

Regards,
Todd A. Creek
p.502-212-4902
f. 502-212-4907
todd.creek@truequote.com


Thanks for your call Friday and sorry I wasn't available.

You asked for our analysis concerning the fact that the website will include
price data (initially on the full list of 200 or so Reference Entities) which
will be generally available to be seen, but not traded on by parties
accessing our credit website.

You're quite right that, prima facie, although trading on these names will
not be possible in all countries from which the credit website may be
accessed, the concerns discussed relating to confidential info are still
pertinent.  Ultimately, we have managed to get reasonably comfortable with
these issues (along with outside counsel), based on the following mitigants:

a special disclaimer (legal and privacy statement) blessed by US and UK
counsel will appear on the website (this emphasises "no reliance" by parties
visiting the website)
the due diligence for the 8 countries we reviewed - since they include Common
Law and Civil law jurisdictions (particularly the US and UK) - should have
flushed out the main issues likely to arise in other countries
provided we adhere to our new procedures governing confidential information,
these should be effective to prevent similar claims which might arise under
the laws of most other countries
as a general point, it is impossible to do legal due diligence in all
countries having internet access and many legal commentators take the view
that a pragmatic stance can be taken in the context of internet marketing
provided the markets where due diligence has not been performed are not being
specifically targeted for business.

Timing - The Wesite will launch this Wednesday as planned, but it now appears
(as I think you know) that the Online team in Houston are requiring up to 2
clear weeks to set up the new product. This means that crdit trading on Enron
Online will launch on or before 8 March.

I hope this helps and look forward to speaking to you tomorrow.

Regards

Paul


Capt Bentzrod -
Thank you for the information.  We were being asked about the possibility of changing our delivery window slightly, however now the terminal has withdrawn the request.  Please make speed necessary to arrive Lake Charles buoy at 06:00lt on June 8.

Thanks and regards,
Dan Masters

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"LNG/C Hoegh Galleon - Master" <master.amar@hoegh.no>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22LNG_C+20Hoegh+20Galleon+20-+20Master+22+20+3Cmaster+2Eamar+40hoegh+2Eno+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:36 AM
To:	Masters, Dan; Galt, Tony; Perry, Wayne; Fernie, Jim; Y'Barbo, Paul; Kvammen, Kjell - LHS-GAS
Subject:	Resending DEPARTURE FROM PORT SAID

Dear Sir;
Forgot to include the FO-consumption in my previous msg. It is
included now.Based on 0.22% BOG.

Dear Sir;
Have service men onboard which will be sent ashore in Algeciras,
Spain where we also will be taking some store and provision. I
estimate the time for this to approx 12 hours.
Taking this into consideration, I have the following answer to your
questions below:

1) Full charter speed 17.5 kn: 7th June 0600 LT
2) Same as above, 17.5 knots (47.5 mt/day=TOTAL 760 mt)
3) 16.2 knots (30 mt/day=TOTAL 519 mt)
4) 14.9 knots (14 mt/day=TOTAL 263.2 mt)

Brgds Knut Bentzr?d
Master LNG/C "Hoegh Galleon"

Capt. Bentzrod-
Hope all is well for you.  Please provide the following information
at your
earliest convenience:
1) ETA to Lake Charles if ship were to proceede at full speed for the
remainder of the trip.
2) What average speed would be necessary to arrive at Lake Charles
buoy at
06:00 on June 7.
3) What average speed would be necessary to arrive at Lake Charles
buoy at
06:00 on June 8.
4) What average speed would be necessary to arrive at Lake Charles
buoy at
06:00 on June 9.

For each of the above scenarios, also please include an estimate of
the
amount of fuel oil that would be used.

Thank you,
Dan Masters
 -----Original Message-----
   From:   "LNG/C Hoegh Galleon - Master"
<master.amar@hoegh.no>@ENRON
             [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22LNG_C+20Hoegh+20Galleon+20-
+20Master+22+20+3Cmaster+2Eamar+40hoegh+2Eno+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.c om]

   Sent:   Monday, May 21, 2001 12:58 PM
   To:     Masters, Dan; Galt, Tony; Perry, Wayne; Fernie, Jim;
Y'Barbo,
             Paul; Kvammen, Kjell - LHS-GAS
   Subject:  DEPARTURE FROM PORT SAID

   21 MAY 2030 FAOSP

   ROB: FO: 3139,35 MT
   GO: 127 MT
   FW: 184  MT

   Brgds Knut Bentzr?d
   Master LNG/C "Hoegh Galleon"

   E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no
   Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no.+873 330853910
   Fax   : Inmarsat fax no.+873 330853913
   Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.+583 330853915
   Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.+583 430853910 (24hrs.watch)


Michael,
 Please note that the footer is wrong on the 1999 MTBE doc.  It should be
98002gctr.doc instead of 98002fctr.doc.
Please let me know if you need anything further.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 04:51
PM ---------------------------

Jon Paul Lewis
03/21/2001 09:01 AM
To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Kayne,

We are still having problems in the morning with the Hourly books not being
flat.  Could you please talk to the guys again and stress the importance of
flattening the books.  We are having to run our reports multiple times which
causes us to spend most of our morning dealing with these issues.  Again, I
think the guys need to know that we have a 12 pm deadline.  If we are late,
our group gets written up and we have to report why we were late.

Thanks for you help.

J.P.


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <Don62waller@cs.com>
From: Don62waller@cs.com
Full-name: Don62waller
Message-ID: <168.5717a47.294780da@cs.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:31:38 EST
Subject: Hey Kim!
To: kimward@enron.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: CompuServe 2000 32-bit sub 116

Hey Kim,

Hope all is well.  You have been on my mind a lot so I thought I would try to
get in touch with you.  I am now back at home after taking a severance
package with Kraft.  Sept. 6, we had a new addition to the family...Don...who
is so sweet and big.

Are you going to Memphis over the holidays?  I would love to get together!

Take care and let me hear from you!

Much love,

Yonnie