You asked whether current contract approval procedures require the marketers
to get Legal's approval on all transportation contracts.  The answer is no.
If you look at the ET&S policy on authority to grant transportation and
storage discounts (I can fax it to you if you don' t have it), there is a
column for "Pre-approved Terms" and one for "Non Pre-Approved Terms".
Contracts that are not on a pre-approved form always have to have the Legal
Dept's approval.  Contracts on pre-approved forms with a total discount (for
the entire contract term) of less than $1.2 million do not need Legal's
approval; those above the threshold do. Does that make sense?  As far as I
know our marketers have been following this.  I spoke with TK and she is
aware of the policy, and she is also aware that she needs to show me any
contract that deviates from our standard language.  She has also discussed
this with Steve Harris recently to make sure he's comfortable with the
policy.

If we need to discuss this further please let me know.


Desk	 Short Term Northwest	 Short Term California	 Short Term Southwest	 Short Term West BOM
Flow Date	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001	 10/12/2001
Deal Number	 814886	  	  	 815035	  	  	 NOTING TO REAL TIME	 NOTHING TO REAL TIME
Delivery Point	 Mid Columbia	  	  	 SP-15
CTPY	 PGE	  	  	 CA Imbalance
MWH	 18	  	  	 25
Position	 Short	  	  	 Long
Hours	 Peak	  	  	 Peak
 Price 	 N/A 	 	  	  $                  25.16

 	 Short Term Northwest	 Short Term California	 Short Term Southwest	 Short Term West BOM
1	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
2	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
3	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
4	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
5	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
6	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
7	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
8	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
9	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
10	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
11	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
12	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
13	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
14	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
15	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
16	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
17	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
18	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
19	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
20	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
21	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
22	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
23	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
24	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
Total	 (288.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	400.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00


Sara, This deal was binding from day one.  EWEB did say that they had
authority to enter into this transaction and thought they had the necessary
approvals from their board, therefore putting this language in the confirm is
alarming to me, maybe the better option may be to switch the deal to physical
if there is any issue with the financial.  Chistian Yoder was okay with their
authority to do this physically.  This deal is deep in the money for us now.
---------------------- Forwarded by Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 12:52
PM ---------------------------

Sara Shackleton
11/27/2000 03:15 PM
To: Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EWEB status

I spoke with Jim Deason who is reviewing our documentation, including, the
ISDA Schedule, Credit Support Annex and Deemed ISDA.  He will email to me
EWEB's comments to our blacklined Schedule.  He has not conferred with Dick
Varner on the Credit Support Annex but hopes to have comments to me later
this week; I offered to have Tracy or Ed available to discuss credit.
Finally, he has reviewed the Deemed ISDA and will have the same comments
here.  HOWEVER, Jim indicated that the transaction which Holli entered into
is not the type of FINANCIAL deal that EWEB has contemplated (or authorized)
and that it would require special board approval.  The Board meets on Dec.
5.  He requested that a special provision be inserted into the confirm prior
to that approval, stating that this transaction is NOT BINDING until approved
by the EWEB Board (Jim will send requested language).  By copy of this
message, I ask that Holli advise on steps to be taken regarding execution of
the Deemed ISDA confirmation.

Click on this link to view the document in the Financial Trading Agreements
database-->


Attached is Bob Superty's summary of the impact on the late noms today.  We
do not anticipate any pipeline penalties.  On those pipes where the nom type
is "Intraday", there may be some pipeline imbalance created for us to work
through.  The logistics staff will have a lot of work to do on Thursday
morning to contact customers asking them to renom on the pipes where our noms
were late.  Overall, these pipelines worked well with us today.
Let me know if you have any questions.  --Sally

---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 06:59 PM
---------------------------

Robert Superty
06/28/2000 05:40 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A
Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: System outage nomination impact

I have attached a quick summary of where we currently stand with our
nominations as a result of the hardware problems today.

Please call me if you have any questions, thanks - Bob Superty


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/25/2000 09:05 AM -----

	Diana Seifert
	08/25/2000 05:16 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Guest access Chile

Hello Mark,

Justin Boyd told me that your can help me with questions regarding Chile.
We got a request for guest access through MG.
The company is called Escondida and is a subsidiary of BHP Australia.

Please advise if I can set up a guest account or not.
F.Y.I.: MG is planning to put a "in w/h Chile" contract for Copper on-line as
soon as Enron has done the due diligence for this country.
Thanks !

Best regards

Diana Seifert
EOL PCG


print, and get on distribution
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 10:52 AM -----

	Maureen Raymond@ENRON
	Sent by: Leann Walton@ENRON
	01/29/2001 10:23 AM

		 To: jshankm@enron.com, david.foti@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Global Markets Monitor 26 Jan 01

Please find attached the Global Markets Monitor for the week ending 26
January 2001.

Maureen Raymond-Castaneda and
Gwyn Koepke


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041811.txt


----- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 03:54 PM -----

	"Marcelo Armas M." <marmas@philippi.cl>
	08/30/2000 02:04 PM

		 To: <Brent.Hendry@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Internet trading

Brent,

I was under the impression that this memo had been sent last week. I
apologize for the confusion. Please contact me for any questions you may
have.

Regards,

Marcelo

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Brent.Hendry@enron.com <Brent.Hendry@enron.com>
Para: Marcelo Armas M. <marmas@philippi.cl>
Fecha: Martes, 29 de Agosto de 2000 12:25 p.m.
Asunto: Re: Internet trading

>
>Marcelo,
>
>Have you had a chance to finalize your review of the ISDA agreement and
>legal survey?  Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the
>materials.
>
>Regards,
>
>Brent
>
>
>
>
>
>

 - Memo Internet final.doc


OK

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:25 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; McConnell, Mark
Cc:	Centilli, James
Subject:	Trans Pecos

Steve,

James re-ran Trans Pecos with the following:

	Term:  20 years
	Rate:  $0.261
	Volume:  240,000 MMBtu/d
	Cost:  $130.274MM (Without cost of NNG I/C and over-run up to $143.9MM)
		then
	ROE: 12.38%

	If Cost is capped at $130.274 (no over-run), then ROE is 15.25%

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

	Term:  15 Years
	Rate:  $0.261
	Volume:  240,000 MMBtu/d
	Cost:  $130.9 (Without cost of NNG I/C and over-run up to $143.9MM)
		then
	ROE:  10.82%

	If Cost is capped at $130.274 (no over-run), then ROE is 13.8%

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's discuss tomorrow morning.    Kim.


By STEVE EVERLY - The Kansas City Star
Date: 01/20/01 22:15

As natural gas prices rose in December, traders at the New York Mercantile
Exchange kept one eye on the weather forecast and another on a weekly gas
storage number.

The storage figures showed utilities withdrawing huge amounts of gas, and the
forecast was for frigid weather. Traders put the two together, anticipated a
supply crunch and drove gas prices to record heights.

"Traders do that all the time; they're looking forward," said William Burson,
a trader. "It makes the market for natural gas."

But the market's response perplexed Chris McGill, the American Gas
Association's director of gas supply and transportation. He had compiled the
storage numbers since they were first published in 1994, and in his view the
numbers were being misinterpreted to show a situation far bleaker than
reality.

"It's a little frustrating that they don't take the time to understand what
we are reporting," McGill said.

As consumer outrage builds over high heating bills, the hunt for reasons --
and culprits -- is on. Some within the natural gas industry are pointing
fingers at Wall Street.

Stephen Adik, senior vice president of the Indiana utility NiSource, recently
stepped before an industry conference and blamed the market's speculators for
the rise in gas prices.

"It's my firm belief ... that today's gas prices are being manipulated," Adik
told the trade magazine Public Utilities Fortnightly.

In California, where natural gas spikes have contributed to an electric
utility crisis, six investigations are looking into the power industry.

Closer to home, observers note that utilities and regulators share the blame
for this winter's startling gas bills, having failed to protect their
customers and constituents from such price spikes.

Most utilities, often with the acquiescence of regulators, failed to take
precautions such as fixed-rate contracts and hedging -- a sort of price
insurance -- that could have protected their customers by locking in gas
prices before they soared.

"We're passing on our gas costs, which we have no control over," said Paul
Snider, a spokesman for Missouri Gas Energy.

But critics say the utilities shirked their responsibility to customers.

"There's been a failure of risk management by utilities, and that needs to
change," said Ed Krapels, director of gas power services for Energy Security
Analysis Inc., an energy consulting firm in Wakefield, Mass.

Hot topic

Consumers know one thing for certain: Their heating bills are up sharply. In
many circles, little else is discussed.

The Rev. Vincent Fraser of Glad Tidings Assembly of God in Kansas City is
facing a $1,456 December bill for heating the church -- more than double the
previous December's bill. Church members are suffering from higher bills as
well.

The Sunday collection is down, said Fraser, who might have to forgo part of
his salary. For the first time, the church is unable to meet its financial
pledge to overseas missionaries because the money is going to heating.

"It's the talk of the town here," he said.

A year ago that wasn't a fear. Wholesale gas prices hovered just above $2 per
thousand cubic feet -- a level that producers say didn't make it worthwhile
to drill for gas. Utilities were even cutting the gas prices paid by
customers.

But trouble was brewing. By spring, gas prices were hitting $4 per thousand
cubic feet, just as utilities were beginning to buy gas to put into storage
for winter.

There was a dip in the fall, but then prices rebounded. By early November,
prices were at $5 per thousand cubic feet. The federal Energy Information
Administration was predicting sufficient but tight gas supplies and heating
bills that would be 30 percent to 40 percent higher.

But $10 gas was coming. Below-normal temperatures hit much of the country,
including the Kansas City area, and fears about tight supplies roiled the gas
markets.

"It's all about the weather," said Krapels of Energy Security Analysis.

Wholesale prices exploded to $10 per thousand cubic feet, led by the New York
traders. Natural gas sealed its reputation as the most price-volatile
commodity in the world.

Setting the price

In the 1980s, the federal government took the caps off the wellhead price of
gas, allowing it to float. In 1990, the New York Mercantile began trading
contracts for future delivery of natural gas, and that market soon had
widespread influence over gas prices.

The futures contracts are bought and sold for delivery of natural gas as soon
as next month or as far ahead as three years. Suppliers can lock in sale
prices for the gas they expect to produce. And big gas consumers, from
utilities to companies such as Farmland Industries Inc., can lock in what
they pay for the gas they expect to use.

There are also speculators who trade the futures contracts with no intention
of actually buying or selling the gas -- and often with little real knowledge
of natural gas.

But if they get on the right side of a price trend, traders don't need to
know much about gas -- or whatever commodity they're trading. Like all
futures, the gas contracts are purchased on credit. That leverage adds to
their volatility and to the traders' ability to make or lose a lot of money
in a short time.

As December began, the price of natural gas on the futures market was less
than $7 per thousand cubic feet. By the end of the month it was nearly $10.
Much of the spark for the rally came from the American Gas Association's
weekly storage numbers.

Utilities buy ahead and store as much as 50 percent of the gas they expect to
need in the winter.

Going into the winter, the storage levels were about 5 percent less than
average, in part because some utilities were holding off on purchasing, in
hopes that the summer's unusually high $4 to $5 prices would drop.

Still, the American Gas Association offered assurances that supplies would be
sufficient. But when below-normal temperatures arrived in November, the
concerns increased among traders that supplies could be insufficient.

Then the American Gas Association reported the lowest year-end storage
numbers since they were first published in 1994. Still, said the
association's McGill, there was sufficient gas in storage.

But some utility executives didn't share that view. William Eliason, vice
president of Kansas Gas Service, said that if December's cold snap had
continued into January, there could have been a real problem meeting demand.

"I was getting worried," he said.

Then suddenly the market turned when January's weather turned warmer.
Wednesday's storage numbers were better than expected, and futures prices
dropped more than $1 per thousand cubic feet.

Just passing through

Some utilities said there was little else to do about the price increase but
pass their fuel costs on to customers.

Among area utilities, Kansas Gas Service increased its customers' cost-of-gas
charge earlier this month to $8.68 per thousand cubic feet. And Missouri Gas
Energy has requested an increase to $9.81, to begin Wednesday.

Sheila Lumpe, chairwoman of the Missouri Public Service Commission, said last
month that because utilities passed along their wholesale costs, little could
be done besides urging consumers to join a level-payment plan and to conserve
energy.

Kansas Gas Service had a small hedging program in place, which is expected to
save an average customer about $25 this winter.

Missouri Gas Energy has no hedging program. It waited until fall to seek an
extension of the program and then decided to pass when regulators would not
guarantee that it could recover its hedging costs.

Now utilities are being asked to justify the decisions that have left
customers with such high gas bills. And regulators are being asked whether
they should abandon the practice of letting utilities pass along their fuel
costs.

On Friday, Doug Micheel, senior counsel of the Missouri Office of the Public
Counsel, said his office would ask the Missouri Public Service Commission to
perform an emergency audit of Missouri Gas Energy's gas purchasing practices.

"Consumers are taking all the risk," Micheel said. "It's time to consider
some changes."

To reach Steve Everly, call (816) 234-4455 or send e-mail to
severly@kcstar.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
All content , 2001 The Kansas City Star


Please make sure your group is aware of the phone outage.

Thanks Tjae
---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001
11:28 AM ---------------------------
From: David Cummings/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/16/2001 11:23 AM
To: Lucy Marshall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tamara Jae
Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Betty J
Coneway/ENRON@enronXgate, Stacy Weatherly/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lynn
Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Helen Marie
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Underwood/ENRON@enronXgate, Kathy
Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Sally Slaughter/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Therese Candella/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Don
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura Vuittonet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Turret Phone Outage

Tonight at approximately 7:20 PM, there will be an Turret phone outage
lasting until 8:00PM.; All phones will be inoperable during this period.;
This outage is necessary to resynchronize all line and trader information in
the switch.; Night traders on the Power Desk will have Lucent phone operation
during this period for the East Watts Line.; Thank you for your patience.
;
;
;
David A. Cummings
713-853-0400 Office
281-541-7563 Cell


FYI.  Report from California's IPP trade association.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/12/2001 07:42 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	01/12/2001 06:52 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steven Kelley"
<steven@iepa.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Roger Pelote"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Robert Lamkin" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
"Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Marty
McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kassandra Gough"
<kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Hap
Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane
Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "David Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Bob
Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Craig Chancellor"
<craigc@calpine.com>, "Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Kate
Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>
		 Subject: Legislative Weekly Report Week Ending 1/12

Date: 1/12/01
To:  Jan Smutny-Jones
      Steven Kelly
      Katie Kaplan
Cc: IEP Board of Directors
RE: Legislative Weekly Report Week Ending 1/12

RECENT EVENTS:

-- IEP has been meeting with legislators over the past two weeks.  Jan
and//or Katie and I have been attending these meetings.  Since Jan has been
in Washington DC we have rescheduled some of the more important meetings for
when he is back in town next week.  In general the meetings fall into two
categories and seem to be defined by party affiliation.  While this may not
be everyone's experience, our experience so far has showed that many of the
Republicans have embraced our message and are offering to lend support where
they are able.  Many of the Democrats have demonstrated extreme caution, are
interested in our message, but offering little or no support.  The major
theme for them is what they can take back to their districts.

The one exception on the Democratic side so far has been Senator Machado who
has requested IEP draft language on long-term contracting.  Senator Bill
Morrow (R) has requested assistance in drafting language on the NIMBY siting
issue, which we agreed to do so.  We have agree to assist both.

From hereon, we will focus on our meeting efforts on the new Assembly ECA
committee members and "meet and greets" with the new members in both the
Assembly and the Senate.  Because this meeting list was changing on an
hourly basis, it was impossible to forward to Board members.  Please be
sure, if you haven't already, to send us a list of your representatives so
we can contact you when a meeting with them has been confirmed.

-- Assembly U&C staff organized a meeting with the CEC and generators with
repower projects.  Generators in attendance included representatives from
Duke, Dynegy, Southern, AES and Sunrise (Williams was there but didn't
speak).  After each of the participants airing their grievances, we were
tasked with developing language, getting the generating industry to support
it and supporting it in the legislative process.  We were given until Friday
to hand in bill language to the U&C staff.  Such a commitment comes with
many promises and pitfalls which shuld be discussed next week on a
conference call which IEP will be setting up.

-- As reported in an e-mail yesterday, the first two special session bills
passed out of the new Assembly Energy Costs and Availability (ECA) committee
yesterday (ABX 5 and ABX6, both attached, but amended versions not in print
yet).  Both measures also passed off the Assembly floor today and are on
their way to the Senate for consideration in the Senate Energy Committee.
Members of that committee have not yet been announced.

-- The Governor had a press conference today to announce a plan to reduce
California's energy use by at least five percent within a week.  During the
Q&A portion of the press conference the Governor suggested the three members
of the new ISO Board should be the President of the CPUC, and the Chairs of
the EOB and the CEC.

UPCOMING EVENTS:

--  The Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee is having an informational
hearing on Tuesday, January 16th at 1:30 pm in room 4202.  IEP will be
setting up a conference call to discuss IEP's involvement in this hearing.

--end--

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modsette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - 2001 Tracking Report.doc
 - abx1_5_bill_20010109_introduced.pdf
 - abx1_6_bill_20010111_introduced.pdf


Hi Sara,

I need to reschedule on of the three brokerage account meetings that are on
my calendar for tomorrow.

My calendar indicates that I have a 9 a.m. one hour meeting with you, a 10
a.m. one hour swaps meeting, a 1:30 brokerage account meeting a 2:30 one hour
credit support meeting and a 4 p.m. meeting with someone from yet another
Enron entity seeking to open a brokerage account on an urgent basis.

Keegan and I have now developed a strategy to ensure that we do not have so
many meetings on one day.  Most of the other meetings are group meetings and
therefore are not possible to reschedule.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


David - well done on the legislative change regarding bandwidth.   mcs

David Merrill@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
13/07/2000 09:39
To: donald_lassere@enron.net
cc: james_row@enron.net, Nicole Palczer@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Mark
Schroeder@ECT, Scott Bolton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Colin Jackson@ECT, Sarah
Goodpastor@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS

Subject: Singapore Telecom Competition Code - Second Draft

Bandwidth Trading

The second draft of the Singapore competition code did add a reference to
bandwidth trading,
as we suggested.   The drafters chose to put the reference in the section on
the competition
regime, as an example of agreements that do not restrict competition.

   Under Section 8 of the draft Code, which deals primarily with agreements
between licensees
   that unreasonably restrict competition, there is a subsection dealing with
"Exceptions for
   Agreements Necessary for Legitimate Collaborative Ventures".   That
section says:

   "Nothing [in this Code containing various prohibitions on restrictions of
competition] ... prohibits
   agreements amongst Licensees that enter into an efficiency- enhancing
integration of economic
   activity, where such agreement is no broader than necessary to achieve the
pro-competitive
   benefit.  For example, if competing licensees establish a joint purchasing
or production venture,
   which is designed to increase total output and lower prices, the two
parties could agree regarding
   the prices to be paid by the joint venture.   Similarly, if competing
Licensees were to establish a
   market for trading bandwidth, the Licensees could exclude competitors that
did not agree to
   certain standardized terms, if those terms are necessary to allow for the
efficient operation if
   the market."

This seems to accomplish our purpose of referencing bandwidth trading in the
code as a
worthy concept in Singapore, and does not restrict bandwidth trading to the
situation used
in the example.

Other changes in the second draft of the Code:

-  Definition of dominant carrier changed:

            Rather than depending on market power in a specific service,
dominant definition
            of a carrier will relate to its control of last-mile facilities;
ability to raise end-user prices
            and/or reduce output; and cost or difficulty of  replicating
facilities.

            Dominant carriers initially are still Singtel (wireline license
only), SCV, and 1-Net.

-  Process for licensees to get interconnection agreements with Dominant
Licensees accelerated
            and new entrants given options for interconnecting with Dominant
Licensees
            even while negotiations ongoing so that DL's cannot stall new
entrant operations.

-  Changes in unbundling requirements for dominant carriers.

-  Competition law regime strengthened.

Schedule:

   The Code will be released Sept 1 and will become effective Sept 15.
Dominant
   Licensees have to file Reference Interconnection Offers by Oct 15 and they
   will become effective Dec 15.

DM


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99 10:02 AM
---------------------------

David Forster
12/16/99 09:52 AM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, James B
Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcello Romano/LON/ECT@ECT,
Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zal Masani/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline Power License Restrictions

Further to concerns raised by Jim Fallon, we have acquired a list of
counterparties who are licensed to trade power in the U.S. and will be
restricting EnronOnline U.S. Power trading access to only those companies
which hold a license.

If anyone has any objections to this, please let me know before we accomplish
the update later today.

Thanks,

Dave


fyi....
---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron on 01/18/2000
02:17 PM ---------------------------
Susan Fernandez   12/10/99 01:38 PM

To: Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: PCB Decontamination of Turbine

Lou -

Under the PCB Mega rule, self-implementing decontamination of PCBs (i.e.,
cleanup without verification sampling) is only available for PCB containers;
movable equipment used in storage areas, tools and sampling equipment; non
porous surfaces contaminated with mineral oil dielectric fluid; and air
compressor systems.  40 CFR 761.79(c).  EPA has yet to provide written
guidance on its PCB Mega Rule decontamination regulations.  Based on my
reading of the regulations, a contaminated turbine must be decontaminated in
accordance with the measurement-based decontamination methods.

The measurement-based decontamination procedures are not prescriptive.  The
simply require that the non porous surface be cleaned by a method that
reduces the surface concentration to less than or equal to 10 micrograms PCBs
per 100 square centimeters if the equipment is decontaminated for
unrestricted use or less than 100 micrograms PCBs per 100 square centimeters
if the material is to be disposed of in an industrial smelter after
decontamination. 40 CFR 761.79(b).   I assume that the most efficient method
of "cleaning" a turbine would be to drain the turbine of all free flowing
liquids and then wipe or soak all surfaces that were exposed to PCBs with or
in solvent.

If a solvent is used to clean the surfaces, the regulations require that it
have a solubility of PCBs of 5% or more by weight (other parts of the
regulations recommend Kerosene, diesel fuel, terpene hydrocarbons and a
mixture of terpene hydrocarbons and terpene alcohols).  The solvent can
continued to be used until it reaches a concentration of 50 ppm PCBs.  40 CFR
761.79(d).

Once the surfaces have been wiped clean with the solvent, verification
sampling can be done using the standard wipe test at locations on the turbine
selected under Subpart P (which includes the sampling of small and irregular
shaped surfaces).  If the measurements show the surfaces have been cleaned to
< 10 ug/100 cm2, the equipment is available for unrestricted use.  40 CFR
761.79(b)(3)(1)(i)(A).

Persons participating in the decontamination activities must use protective
clothing or equipment to protect against dermal contact of inhalation of PCBs
or materials containing PCBs and take precautions not to release PCBs into
the environment from the decontamination area.  40 CFR 761.79(e).

Written records of the sampling procedure used to verify that the equipment
has been decontaminated and sampling results must be maintained for 3 years.
The regulations do not require that a written record of the procedure used to
decontaminate the material be generated or maintained.  40 CFR 761.79(f).

Decontamination wastes and residues that are generated by rinsing or soaking
contaminated surfaces with solvent can be disposed of at their existing
concentration, which means that hydrocarbon solvents used which contain <50
ppm PCBs can be marketed as used oil.  40 CFR 761.79(g).

The non-liquid cleaning materials (e.g., rags) and personal protective
equipment, regardless of concentration, can be disposed of at a municipal
landfill, a industrial non hazardous waste facility, a RCRA subtitle C
facility permitted to accept PCBs or a TSCA PCB disposal facility.  40 CFR
761.79(g)(6).

Finally, notification to the EPA is not required.  Verification sampling
procedures and analysis must be available for EPA review when requested.  40
CFR 761.79(f).

A very simple procedure would be:

1.  All persons participating in the decontamination activity must wear
personal protective equipment that protects from skin exposure that prevents
inhalation of PCBs.

2.  Drain turbine of all free flowing liquids.

3.  Wipe all surfaces or parts the would or could have been in contact with
liquids with rags soaked in clean, unused solvent such as Kerosene.

4.  Collect all personal protective equipment and rags used during the
decontamination process in drums for disposal.

5.  Collect all used solvent and appropriate containers (Drums?).  Collect
sample of solvent and have it tested to determine disposal options.

6.  Sampling cleaned equipment by collecting wipe samples at locations
determined under Subpart P of the regulations.

7.  If verification samples indicate equipment is contaminated at levels less
than or equal to 10 ug/100 cm2 PCBs, the equipment is released for
unrestricted use.  If samples indicate greater levels of PCBs, cleaning as
described above must be repeated with follow-up verification sampling.

Call me after you have had a chance to look at this.

Sue


Steve,

Friday morning is fine.
What about 8:00 a.m.?

Vince

Steven Leppard
01/09/2001 11:07 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marco Verreschi/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthew D
Williams/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Transmission modelling

Vince

Marco is only available for a meeting on Friday of this week to discuss
transmission modelling.  Please advise of your availability.

Thanks,
Steve


In December we entered two swaps on Enron stock to hedge out the exposure we
created by granting options.  We consider them trading securities, so I have
included them in the spreadsheet accordingly.

Gail Tholen explained to me that we have long term contracts to remove the
variability of revenues in Bammel Looper and Mid Texas.  I have changed the
total return swap model to use the volatility of prices in 2013 (when the
contracts expire), rather than spot volatilities.  As a result, December VaR
for total return swaps fell from $34 to $28 million.

With the partly offsetting effects of the new Enron stock and total return
swaps, December VaR for trading securities therefore fell from $70 to $68
million.

I recalculated total return swap VaR for the rest of 2000 using volatilities
for 2013.  Nevertheless, the impact is small, since spot volatilities were
not as high throughout the year as in December.  As a matter of fact, the
average, high, and low trading securities VaRs for 2000 remain largely
unchanged.

Regards,

Eugenio


Investment Special  Tonight's Feature Company
 ShareCom, Inc. (OTCBB: SHCC)  Current Price: $0.0063  52 Week High: $2.49 52 Week Low: $0.0062        Why SHCC?   SHCC has established business relationships with FEMA, the American Red Cross, AAA, NOAA, and more.   SHCC is currently booking revenues of $45,000 per month and projects revenues of $13 million for 2002.   On January 17th, SHCC showed its continued growth track through its new partnership with Maxwood Technology to produce breakthrough emergency broadcast products.   The Time is NOW at Sharecom  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the National Weather Service (NWS), the Red Cross and AAA are a but a few of the agencies and organizations with whom ShareCom Inc. has forged alliances to ensure clear competitive advantage for its product lines. The past 10 years have seen a dramatic increase in severe weather conditions, and with continued global warming these patterns will become worse. Prompted by FEMA and NWS aggressive programs, demand for the company's NOAA radios will soar.  Today 7% of American homes possess an NOAA radio.  The national goal is 100%.  Sharecom's www.WeatherRadios.com is the site for consumers to purchase the company's superior product at a significant discount. SHCC's revenue flow rate is at $45,000/month and rapidly growing. The Company will realize a profit this year and plans to triple it next.. SHCC's market dominance in this growing "bread and butter", niche business makes it an interesting acquisition candidate and a compelling investment.  This Just Out: SHCC NEWS     ShareCom Partners With Maxwood Technology to Produce Breakthrough NOAA Emergency Broadcast Products  Innovative NOAA Emergency Radio products Unveiled at CES 2002  PALATINE, Ill.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 17, 2002-- ShareCom, a leading marketing and sales organization which specializes in NOAA Weather Radio Products, today announced the formation of a strategic alliance with Maxwood Techics BHD and NIKKO CO., LTD.--to design, develop, manunology LTD., an affiliate and partner of NIKKO Electronfacture, market and sell specialized unique Emergency Weather Radio Products never before seen by the consumer electronics industry!  The partnership has developed three specialized products that ShareCom has introduced, including the latest Homeland Security device introduced at the 2002 Consumer Electronics Show.  In addition to the valued priced WRP-50 Weather Radio, ShareCom has introduced two very special and unique products:  The WRP-500 is a New Graphical Interface Emergency Radio that features a PDA style readout that will allow the end user to track weather related broadcasts on a map of the county that the emergency notification from NOAA is broadcast in. This model will also feature a 20 memory tracking capability that will store the last 20 alerts including the time of date, date and nature of the alerts so the end user can track a storm/emergency as it develops. This unit also features a 20 hour battery back up the will allow the end user complete warning capability in the case that power is lost to the home. With the county codes built into the software, this model is the easiest NOAA Weather Radio on the market to program.  The WRP-900 is a unique computer based homeland security product that will interface with any PC or server network, and will allow people in offices, business and homes to have the most up-to-date weather or national emergency information directly from the federal government. NOAA will be able to broadcast FEMA warnings as well as supply information for "follow on'' details as to where to go to get food, water, medical help or shelter in the area of a national emergency to weather related disaster.  "Our ability to develop and produce unique and strategic products is significantly enhanced as a result of this partnership," says Brad Nordling, President and CEO of ShareCom, Inc. "Maxwood Technology has a tremendous amount of technical abilities that we will rely upon in producing the highest quality products possible."  "We are pleased to be able to work with ShareCom as a strategic partner in developing and manufacturing communications products that will help inform and protect citizens in the United States of America," Kunihiko Ichioka, President and CEO of Maxwood Technology Ltd.     Stay tuned for more announcements to come  More Reasons to Consider Buying SHCC  1. WeatherRadios.com has been awarded a National Partnership with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to increase the use of Weather Radios countrywide through a program called Project Impact. There are 2,600 Project Impact communities in the U.S. The FEMA website lists WeatherRadios.com as a national partner  providing a banner and link to the WeatherRadios.com site. The FEMA site receives over 100,000 visitors per day.  2.  The National Oceanic and Aerospace Administration (NOAA) has WeatherRadios.com listed first on their web site page that tells people where to purchase a NOAA Weather Radio.  3.  The National Weather Service (NWS) has offered to promote corporate sponsorships to the WeatherRadios.com site through  recognition and media support.  4.  Local American Red Cross chapters will promote NOAA Weather Radios through WeatherRadios.com in exchange for a $5.00 donation per sold radio.  5.  The Chicago area AAA will feature SHCC's  2WayTalk.com on its website offering exclusive discounts on Weather Radios, and FRS Family Radios. 2WayTalk.com will also be  listed in the AAA magazine called "Home and Away".  6.  The Federation of Manufactured Home Owners of Florida (FMO) has entered into a one-year agreement that will increase the sale of Weather Radios from the WeatherRadios.com site. Mailings and web site links will offer a group discount to members and also pay a rebate to the organization for every radio sold.  7.  The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) has begun to promote the discount that is offered  through WeatherRadios.com site. Magazine articles, mailings and web site links will offer a group discount to members and also pay a rebate to the organization for every radio sold. This      agreement will run for one year.  Why Weather Radios are Poised for Growth  NOAA Weather Radios automatically alert people of impending severe weather conditions "24/7". This is especially critical for families while sleeping. These devices are fast becoming recognized as essential and potentially life saving for use in homes, businesses, and critical care facilities.  The National Weather Service (NWS) has stated that there has been an increase in severe weather in the last 10 years and this trend is expected to continue. NWS has a published goal for NOAA Weather Radios to be in every home within the next 10 years. Currently, approximately just 7% of homes have this device. This being said, we can expect a tremendous increase in the presence and sale of weather radios over the coming years. The NWS, NOAA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other government agencies have an aggressive education and funding effort to reach the 100% goal.  New technology called Specific Area Message Encoding (SAME) was introduced in the mid 90s. It allows users to set an alarm only for their specific geographic area. This feature is expected to make this tool commonplace in homes alerting families of weather conditions that pose an immediate danger.   Additionally, 2WayTalk.com will continue to focus on Internet users who are outdoor enthusiasts. The market continues to be strong and growing. FRS Family Radios are now becoming a popular family item on vacations, ski trips, camping, and biking events. They are used for a wide variety of purposes, from staying in touch with children playing in the neighborhood, to coordinating soccer tournaments and antique auctions.   A Final Word About SHCC  SHCC is currently booking $45,000/ month and is conservatively projecting earnings next year of $1.3 million on revenues of $13 million. Unlike most e-commerce ventures, ShareCom's marketing "burn rate" is very modest. The Company forecasts revenues of $32.5 million the following year, increasing profitability to earn $4.6 million. Given its impressive relationships and the rapidly growing market for its product, SHCC's share price of just 1.6 cents makes it a compelling play for the astute investor.
 To be removed from future mailings, please reply to this email with "Remove" in the subject line   DISCLAIMER:  Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements."  Forward looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as "projects", "foresee", "expects", "will,"  "anticipates," "estimates," "believes," "understands" or that by statements indicating certain actions "may," "could," or "might" occur.  All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Investment News Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email.  None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice.  In compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, Section17(b), Investment Special discloses the receipt of $20,000 cash from a third party for the publication of this report and additional services related to SHCC.  In addition, Investment Special discloses the receipt of fifteen million unrestricted shares of SHCC from a third party for the publication of this report and additional services related to SHCC.  Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from our intent to profit from the sale of these shares.  Part or all of our position may be liquidated at any time, even after we have made positive statements regarding the above company.  All factual information in this report was gathered from public sources, including but not limited to SEC filings, Company Press Releases, and Market Guide.  Investment Special  believes this information to be reliable but can make no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. Use of the material within this email constitutes your acceptance of these terms.   To be removed from future mailings, please reply to this email with "Remove" in the subject line


Tuesday 12/28/99
9:00am   Aspiration biopsy with specimen collection hematology.

Wed 12/29/99
7:00 am  CT scan without oral preparation
10:00am Bone scan dosage
12:00pm Bone scan examination

Thur 12/30/99

4:00 pm  appointment with Dr. Lee Jin Soo

There you go.


Is that point the receipt point Sempra would have to use to take the base gas
volumes away from Cunningham?  Thanks.  DF

	From:  Dari Dornan                           06/01/2000 09:09 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: last year's deal

---------------------- Forwarded by Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron on 06/01/2000
09:06 AM ---------------------------

Linda Trevino
06/01/2000 08:47 AM
To: Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: last year's deal

If someone tries to nominate POI 61243 they will receive a message saying
"Invalid point".  The market service rep will then notify me because they
cannot nominate on the point.  I will then notify Jan.  Jan and I will notify
Sue, Morgan, Kent and yourself.  Let me know if we need to change anything.

Linda

	From:  Dari Dornan                           06/01/2000 08:33 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jan Moore/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Trevino/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Sue M Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: last year's deal

Jan and  Linda, the issue is how does anyone know for last years base gas
deal if it has "gone physical" (if Sempra nominates the SF agreement for
delivery).  My answer subject to your verification is that the POI that they
have to nominate to is flagged as not available, so when they nominate Market
Services is aware of it and is to call Kent/Sue/Morgan.  Could you fill in
any missing details.  Thanks, Dari

	From:  Drew Fossum                           05/31/2000 06:11 PM

To: Sue M Neville/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: last year's deal

They nominate the SF to market services also, in addition to any transport
they have?  Dari, please follow up on this with market services and verify
what the procedures are and let us all know.    Again, this may relate to a
counterproposal we make to TCEM if they barf on the corporate guarantee
issue, so time is of the essence.  Thanks.  DF

   Sue M Neville                05/31/2000 11:14 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: last year's deal

addition to my first reply:

Also, Sempra does not nominate to Kent/Sue/Morgan.  They nominate to Market
Services.  Sempra's scheduler would not even think to call any one of us.  We
would only hope their deal maker, David Otte, would be in the loop on their
side and notify one of us if they ever decided to go physical.

Sue


Fax no is 713/646-3490.

	"Anita Herrera" <aherrera@statoilenergy.com>
	07/06/2000 06:03 PM

		 To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Crude trades

Sorry - if you're there, what's your fax #.  Otherwise I'll get it to you
tomorrow.

Tana.Jones@enron.com on 07/06/2000 06:33:32 PM

 To:      Anita Herrera/TEG/US@TEG

 cc:

 Subject: Re: Crude trades

Anita,

You were going to fax me the form of assignment...

                    "Anita Herrera"
                    <aherrera@statoile        To:     "Tana Jones"
<Tana.Jones@enron.com>
                    nergy.com>                cc:
                                              Subject:     Crude trades
                    07/05/2000 06:06
                    PM

Attached is the one crude trade between the 2 companies:
(See attached file: Enron crude trades.xls)

(See attached file: Enron crude trades.xls)

 - Enron crude trades.xls


This is a reminder of Enron's Email retention policy.  The Email retention policy provides as follows:

Message Location - Maximum Retention
Inbox - 30 days
Sent Mail Folder - 30 days
Trash/Deleted Items - Rollover from Inbox for one day
Folders - All Email messages placed in folders will be destroyed after one calendar year. This includes public folders in Outlook.

Furthermore, it is against policy to store Email outside of your Outlook Mailbox and/or your Public Folders.  Please do not copy Email onto floppy disks, zip disks, CDs or the network.  Such actions are prohibited and will not be supported by the IT Department.

There will be no exceptions to this policy.


-----Original Message-----
From: De, Rabi
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:02 AM
To: Tamarchenko, Tanya; Mack, Iris; Shanbhogue, Vasant; Dhar, Amitava;
Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: ERisk iConference.htm -- FYI


Robin,
I took a look at how the Exotics book is being pulled in and everything looks
fine with the exception of the Nymex equivalency factor for AECOUS.  Would
you be able to change the factor from 1 to .8 until March 2002.
Thanks
Kathy

Robin Rodrigue
07/17/2000 06:39 PM
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT, Nicole LaPorte/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

Sorry it took so long.

Robin


Chris Calger and I invite you to a meeting to discuss the Dynegy merger if you were not able to attend on Monday.

	Date:   Tuesday, November 13
	Place:  Mt. Hood Conference Room
	Time:   2 p.m.

Let me know if you have any questions.


Sam:  There are now two entries for J.P. Morgan Futures, Inc.  I didn't
realize that you had entered an agreement.  I didn't want to delete your
entry but I don't understand what you entered.  Is it a futures agreement?  I
am negotiating the futures agreement.  Also, the email address you entered is
incorrect.  Please help.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - BarAcquaintance.exe


Ken

Enron supports employees' involvement in civic organization
and I think you should continue tour involvement with LWF.
It's important that we give  something back  to society.
You don't have to take a day off to attend workshops.

Vince

Kenneth Parkhill@ENRON
12/04/2000 09:19 AM
To: vince.kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: My involvement in Leadership Fort Worth

Vince,

I am currently a candidate member of Leadership Fort Worth through August of
2001.  I don't know if you are familiar with Leadership Houston or any other
Leadership group, but it is basically a civic organization that provides a
forum for leaders to learn more about their community and opportunities for
civic leadership.  For their first year, members are candidates and must
attend about 1 full-day workshop a month in FW, normally on a Thursday.
After that, members can transfer to other Leadership cities.  I talked with
Stinson about the group and he thought I should talk with you about whether
or not I should stay involved with LFW.  The attached email describes the
December meeting scheduled for 12/14.  Thanks

ken

---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Parkhill/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000
09:07 AM ---------------------------

ann@abarr.net on 12/01/2000 11:35:42 AM
Please respond to <ann@abarr.net>
To: "William Jenkins, Jr." <wjenkins@jw.com>, "Walter Lincoln Office"
<Walter.Lincoln@LibertyMutual.com>, "Victor Howell" <victor.howell@bnsf.com>,
"Vicki Dickerson" <vdickerson@spgfw.com>, "Vanessa Boling"
<bolingv@ci.fort-worth.tx.us>, "Steve Johnson" <sjohnson@txu.com>, "Sandra
Short" <jjshort@flash.net>, "Rusty Hodapp" <rhodapp@dfwairport.com>, "Ron
Stutes" <rstutes@jpshealthnetwork.org>, "Rob Sell"
<rob@homesofcharacter.com>, "Rita Vinson" <pvinson@flash.net>, "Platt Allen,
III" <platt.allen@americredit.com>, "Michelle Peebles-Trollope"
<mtrollope@tnpe.com>, "Melanie Hoover" <melaniehoover@fortworth.com>, "Matt
Byars" <matthewb@star-telegram.com>, "Mary Jane Ashmore"
<maryjane.ashmore@hillwood.com>, "Martha Musgrove" <musgrove@the-T.com>,
"Marla Sapp" <lcacmarla@aol.com>, "Lynn Lester" <llester@mcnt.com>, "Lori
Smith" <lsmith@tnpe.com>, "Linda Winkelman" <lindaw@firsttexascampfire.org>,
"Liane Janovsky" <ljanovsky@lawsnakard.com>, "Leslie Pope" <lpope@cfntx.org>,
"Lauri Newlin" <LNewlin@carterbloodcare.org>, "Kenneth Parkhill"
<kenneth.parkhill@enron.com>, "Keith Kline" <kak@swbts.edu>, "Julie Johncox"
<jjewles@azone.net>, "John Hallam" <jhhallam@bekco.com>, "Joe Drago"
<jdrago@belaw.com>, "Jim Rhodes" <jrhodes@rhodessecurities.com>, "Jeff
Conner" <jeff_conner@mail.bankone.com>, "Jeff Cashman"
<jcashman@fortworthchamber.com>, "Janet Pacatte" <jpacatte@uwmtc.org>, "Janet
Hahn" <jhahn@deckerjones.com>, "Flavel Chastain" <flavel@huitt-zollars.com>,
"Duane Paul" <pauld@ci.fort-worth.tx.us>, "Don Allen" <allende@c-b.com>,
"Debbie Liles" <dliles@bear.com>, "David Wells" <david.wells@tccd.net>,
"David Duman" <davidd@qarch.com>, "Damon Gaines"
<damon@fortworthinvestor.com>, "Cynthia Persons Phillips"
<cynthia.persons@ppcnet.com>, "Cynthia Harnest" <cgserv@aol.com>, "Craig
Goldman" <ronnies1@flash.net>, "Courtney Jeans" <courtney.jeans@chase.com>,
"Cornell Thomas" <c.thomas@tcu.edu>, "Cathy Coleman" <famcoleman@aol.com>,
"Cal Martinez" <cmartinez@goodwillfw.org>, "Bonita Maurer"
<bmaurer@us.ibm.com>, "Ardina Washington" <washina@ci.fort-worth.tx.us>
cc:

Subject: Economic and Workforce Development Day

Attached is information about Economic and Workforce  Development Day.? This
class day will be Thursday, December 14,  2000
 - Meme Economic Development Day Dec 2000.doc
 - Christmas Invitation 2000 Reata.doc


I would like to invite you and a guest to join me for the annual Juvenile
Diabetes Foundation Gala to be held on May 12, 2001 at the Westin Galleria.
The guest speaker this year will be General Norman Schwarzkof.

Please contact Cathy Phillips (X-36898) and let her know if you are
interested in attending.  Thank you.

Mike


I have very little info on this deal.  Who pays for the FT on Equitrans?
Contract 270, volume=1,000/day, start date = 7/1/97, max demand, all receipts
and all deliveries, AND the end date is 10/31/2099 (looks suspicious to me).
Scott is trying to find the term of this deal from Equitrans.  I believe
Equitrans did say this is a capacity release deal.

Scott, I'm going to list this as a wholesale deal for now.  It was not on my
wholesale transport worksheet from Mark Breese.  Please email everyone with
the end date when you find out.  Also, please find out who the releasing
shipper is and the primary receipt and delivery points.

Thanks


Well, folks, one should never use the word 'final' around here!    Friday's
PRC meeting room location at the Hotel Sofitel has been changed to the Opera
Room!

Cindy


I left you a message by phone regarding Sat?  Do you have plans?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


____________________________________________
  Enron Net Works Ventures Portfolio News
_______________________________________

Computerworld Honors Acta Technology in Annual 'Top 100 Emerging Companies to
Watch'; Industry Publication Recognizes Leader in B2B Data Integration
?
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 4, 2000--Acta Technology, Inc.,
the leader in business-to-business (B2B) data integration, has been selected
as one of Computerworld's "Top 100 Emerging Companies to Watch," the
magazine's annual review of new leaders in high technology. The magazine has
selected Acta as a winner in the highly-competitive eCommerce category, which
includes other leading B2B software companies such as Blue Martini (Nasdaq:
BLUE), Saga Software (NYSE: AGS), and Ventro (Nasdaq: VNTR).
"We are honored to be included in this year's list of emerging companies,"
said Acta CEO Carol Mills Baldwin. "B2B data integration is emerging as a
must-have technology for businesses around the globe. Recognition for this
technology in Computerworld is further validation of the category we have
created."
B2B data integration resolves one of the principle issues in eBusiness today:
that back-office systems were not designed to meet the data demands of B2B
eCommerce and analytic solutions. Those demands include speed, scalability,
and access to both the real-time and historical data locked away in multiple
back-office systems. By staging real-time and historical data from multiple
systems in data caches, the Acta eCommerce Data Platform allows companies to
deliver the data that is needed, when it is needed, both inside and outside
the enterprise.
Industry analysts have sized the data integration market at $15B (cumulative)
by 2005-driven by the need to provide information-rich data to partners,
suppliers and customers for collaborative computing.
With over 160 customers worldwide, Acta is well-poised to continue leading
the growing B2B data integration market. In the past year, Acta has also won
honors from Upside Magazine (Hot 100 private companies), DM Review (Winner,
World Class Solutions) eWeek (Best Practices Award-B2B Category, Finalist),
and Intelligent Enterprise (RealWare Awards-B2B Category, Finalist).
__________________________________________________

Other Venture News
____________________________________________________

o Sun Buys Storage Firm HighGround For $400 Million

PALO ALTO, Calif. -- Sun Microsystems announced
it is acquiring HighGround Systems, a developer
of storage resource management software, in a stock-for-stock
transaction valued at approximately $400 million.
The acquisition is expected to close in the third
quarter of 2001. Following completion of the acquisition,
HighGround will become part of Sun's Network Storage
organization, which reports to executive vice president
Janpieter Scheerder. Last December, HighGround raised
$30 million in a mezzanine round of financing led
by Compaq Computer. Centennial Funds, Eagan Managed
Capital, Highland Capital Partners, Sequel Venture
Partners, and Venrock Associates were also investors
in the company.
http://www.sun.com/
http://www.highground.com/
_____________________________________________

o Partech Int'l Raises $500 Million, Adds Two Partners

SAN FRANCISCO -- Partech International, a venture
capital firm that provides financing for start-up
and emerging growth companies in the United States
and Europe, said it has raised a new $500 million
fund. The firm said the new fund consists of $300
million in Partech International Venture IV, an
early stage investment vehicle, and $200 million
in Partech International Growth Funds, which is
focused on expansion and later stage investments.
In related developments, the company said it has
added two new general partners, Nicolas El Baze
and David Welsh, to its team. Mr. El Baze was previously
a venture partner with Partech and a co-founder
of several start-ups, including Software International,
which was acquired by Microsoft.  Mr. Welsh joins
Partech from Portal Software, a provider of infrastructure
software to the communications industry.
http://www.partechintl.com/
_____________________________________________

o Digital Rights Firm Elisar Gets $2 Million in Seed Funds

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. -- Elisar Software, a provider
of online digital rights management and digital
content protection technology, said it received
$2 million in seed funding. Murphree Venture Partners
led the round, which also included Telecommunications
Development Fund. The funds will support sales,
marketing, and research and development for the
company's digital rights management software product.
http://www.elisar.com/
_____________________________________________

o Facility Management Firm Avista Advantage Has Series A Round

SPOKANE, Wash. -- Avista Advantage, a subsidiary
of publicly traded Avista and a provider of Internet-based
facility management, bill consolidaton, and payment
services, said it closed a Series A round with investments
from WS Investment Company and Cascade Investment.
EnerTech Capital Partners led the round. The company
said it will use the funding to refine, expand and
market Avista Advantage's suite of facility-cost-management
service offerings. The amount of the investments
was not disclosed.
http://www.avistaadvantage.com/
_____________________________________________

o Training App Firm Knowledge Planet in $47 Million Round Two

RESTON, Va. -- Knowledge Planet, a Web-based corporate
training applications provider, said it has raised
$47 million in its second round of financing. GE
Equity and DHM Arcadia Partners co-led the round.
Backers included First Union Capital Partners and
AIG Horizon Partners . Previous investors HarbourVest
Partners and Knowledge Universe also participated
in the round. The company said it will use the funds
to increase sales and marketing and for international
expansion.
http://www.knowledgeplanet.com/
_____________________________________________

o Data Storage Firm Xdrive Raises $50 Million in Series D

SANTA MONICA, Calif. -- Xdrive Technologies, a business
database management applications and online data
storage firm, said it has raised $50 million in
its Series D round of financing. Strategic partners
and investors that participated in the round include
StorageNetworks, Network Appliance, Aether Systems,
Mitsubishi, NEC, Pilot House Associates, and Softbank.
Previous investors, including Goldman Sachs Group,
Wit SoundView Ventures, and J. & W. Seligman & Co.,
also participated. The company said it will use
the funds to continue developing its new products,
Xdrive Enterprise and Xdrive Express.
http://www.xdrive.com/
_____________________________________________

o EC Company Changes Name to ADX, Advanced Data Exchange

NEWARK, Calif. -- The EC Company, which hosts applications
for Internet business suppliers, said it has changed
its name to ADX, Advanced Data Exchange, to better
position itself in the Internet business-to-business
industry. The company has strategic partnerships
with over 150 companies including Ace Hardware,
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and Newark Electronics.
ADX is backed by several venture firms including
Talkot Capital, Wasserstein Adelson Ventures, Invemed
Associates, and iCentennial Investments.
http://www.adx.com/
_____________________________________________

o Transport B2B Tradiant Partners with Nine Ocean Carriers

ALAMEDA, Calif. -- Tradiant, a provider of Internet
business-to-business technology and services for
the transportation industry, said it will join with
nine ocean carriers in a partnership that aims to
enable importers and exporters to simplify the process
of containerized transportation. The  multi-million
dollar partnership will launch a new initiative
(currently code-named Global Transportation Network,
or GTN) early in the first quarter of 2001. The
technology platform will facilitate transactions
between the various parties involved in international
trade. The financial terms of the deal were not
disclosed. Carriers in the partnership will receive
an equity stake in the company. These partners include
APL; CP Ships, the container shipping business of
Canadian Pacific Limited, which includes ANZDL,
Canada Maritime, Cast, Contship Containerlines,
Lykes Lines and TMM Lines; Hanjin; Hyundai; K Line;
Mitsui OSK Lines; Senator Lines; Yang Ming; and
Zim Israel Navigation Co. GTN will use Tradiant's
e-commerce platform, which includes booking, track
and trace, and scheduling capabilities. GTN will
provide extended capabilities tailored for shippers
and carriers, including rate and contract management,
cargo forecasting and allocation. Customers include
merchant importers, exporters, freight forwarders,
third party logistics (3PL) providers, and carriers
of commercial freight. Tradiant's investors include
Warburg Pincus, ABN AMRO Private Equity, BEA Systems,
Itochu Corporation, and The Megunticook Fund.
http://www.tradiant.com/

______________________________________________________

o Intel Communications Fund Grows Fund By $300 Million

HILLSBORO, Ore. -- Intel Communications Fund, a
$200 million corporate venture-capital program,
said it is increasing the size of its fund by $300
million.  A company spokesman said the fund, managed
by Intel Capital, will include a special focus on
wireless businesses. The initial program was created
September 1999 to invest in technology startups
in the networking and communications field. The
company is expected to announce additional details
of the fund at the Telecom 2000 conference, now
underway in Hong Kong.
http://www.intel.com/


Matt has asked me to confirm your dinner appointment with him on 1 May 2001.
Please can you also confirm what time you would like to meet.

Many thanks.

Kind regards.

Nina


Don't know about this but I am handling the activity for the Ponderosa Pine Energy Partners, Ltd. (a.k.a. Cleburne Plant, a.k.a. Tenaska Power Partners) on Lone Star Pipeline.  We have a large imbalance on the transport contract that I'm slowly working off but that's about it.

Are you guys aware of any storage?  I'm going to call Joe Parks later and see if he was working on anything related to storage other then Centana.  I also have a contact at  Lone Star that I could ask but I rather see if what we know form the inside first.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:09 PM
To:	Smith, Critz
Cc:	McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:	RE:

I'm not aware of anything like that.  I'll ask around.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Critz
Sent:	Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:05 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:

	Chris,

	I was working on a storage deal for a Lone Star pipeline when things blew up. I know that there was a
	rather large imbalance to the tune of about 800,000 dth in EES's name. I was just following up to see
	if any actions had been taken to utilize or liquidate this asset.

	Critz Smith


As usual, the lawyers are the last to know.

Stuart is working on a transaction to sell the asset (Gleason), and therefore
this ageement needs to be documented asap, which means in the next few days.
Please review the attached and give me a call.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000 09:52
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/09/2000 06:05 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: SWPC Agreement

Kay -

I've reached a verbal agreement with Westinghouse on the LD issues.  I've
attached a letter outlining the agreement.  Could you review from a legal
standpoint?  Call me with questions.

Thanks,

Mitch


I didn;t think that you would say, "Yes." but one can always hope!

Best of luck to you and your bride to be and continued wishes of success.

k

ps please give shankdaddy a pat on his cute little bald head for me.


Please Join Dave and I to watch the final survivor episode this Thursday!


Debra,

In the contract for Roseville, you guys have it spelled Rosedale

DEBRA PERLINGIERE
03/29/2001 02:41 PM
To:	Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	California Muni Masters

Kim,

Please see below, drafts of the following:

Cities of Anaheim, LA, LB, and Glendale.
Should you have any questions,  please contact Dan Hyvl at 36895.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 04:39 PM -----

	Dan J Hyvl 03/28/2001 04:26 PM 	   To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc: Jason R Williams/Enron@EnronXGate  Subject: new masters

Please mail or email these to the parties as Jason requested.


Attached are the most recent blacklines of the Declaration and Bylaws of
the Midway project.  The Articles did not change.  These changes were made
after discussions with Chris Boehler and Greg Krause.  Please let me know if
I may now send them to Scott Williams.  The only thing he may object to is
the lack of strong language guarantying the operation of the storm water
system in Paragraph 3.2.

_______________________________________________________________
The information contained in this transmission may contain
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.
 <<Blackline of Bylaws - Midway_v1.DOC>>   <<Blacklilne of Midway
Declaration 8901_v1.DOC>>


Notice # 01-154
May 7, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX Division Members and Member Firms

FROM:
Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Implementation of New NYMEX Rule 9.11A (&Give-Up Trades8)

DATE:
May 7, 2001
===========================================================
Please be advised that beginning on the trade date of Friday, June 1, 2001,
new NYMEX Rule 9.11A (&Give-Up Trades8) will go into effect.

! In the absence of an applicable give-up agreement, new Rule 9.11A will
define the respective responsibilities/obligations to an order of executing
brokers, customers and Clearing Members.

! The term &executing broker8 as used in Rule 9.11A refers to the registered
billing entity, Member Firm or Floor Broker to whom the order is transmitted.

! Rule 9.11 will provide that, in the absence of an applicable give-up
agreement, a Clearing Member may reject a trade only if: (1) the trade
exceeds trading limits established by the Clearing Member for that customer
that have been communicated to the executing broker as provided by the rule
or (2) the trade is an error for which the executing broker is responsible.

! The new rule also places affirmative obligations on executing brokers to
confirm Clearing Member authorization for an account.  For example, prior to
an executing broker accepting and executing an initial order for any new
customer account, such executing broker must confirm with the Clearing Member
by telephonic, electronic or written means, that:
(a) the customer has a valid account with the Clearing Member;
(b) the account number;
(c) the brokerage rate;
(d) the customer is authorized by the Clearing Member to place orders with
the executing broker for that account; and
(e) a listing or summary of persons authorized to place orders for that
account.
Moreover, the executing broker must retain a copy of the authorization or the
specifics of the telephonic confirmation, which includes: opposite party,
date, time, and any other relevant information.  The Compliance Department
will conduct periodic audits of such records, and falsification of such
information shall be the basis for disciplinary action.

If you have any questions concerning this new rule, please contact Bernard
Purta, Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Operations, at (212)
299- 2380; Thomas LaSala, Vice President, NYMEX Compliance Department, at
(212) 299-2897; or Arthur McCoy, Vice President, Financial Surveillance
Section, NYMEX Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2928,

NEW RULE 9.11A (&Give-Up Trades8)

(Entire rule is new.)

Rule 9.11A Give-Up Trades

In the absence of a give-up agreement whose terms and conditions govern the
responsibilities/obligations of executing brokers, customers and Clearing
Members, the following rules shall define the respective
responsibilities/obligations of those parties to an order.  The &executing
broker8, as used in this rule, is the registered billing entity, Member Firm
or Floor Broker to whom the order is transmitted.

(A)   Responsibilities/Obligations of Clearing Members

(1). Limits Placed by Clearing Member.   A Clearing Member may, in its
discretion, place trading limits on the trades it will accept for give-up for
a customer,s account from an executing broker, provided however, that the
executing broker receives prior written or electronic notice from the
Clearing Member of the trading limits on that account.  Notice must be
received by the executing broker in a timely manner.  A copy of such notice
shall be retained by the Clearing Member.

(2). Trade Rejection.  A Clearing Member may reject (&DK8) a trade only if:
(1) the trade exceeds the trading limits established under Section I(A) of
this rule for that customer and it has been communicated to the executing
broker as described in Subsection (A); or (2) the trade is an error for which
the executing broker is responsible.  If a Clearing Member has a basis for
rejecting a trade, and chooses to do so in accordance with the provisions of
Rule 2.21(B), it must notify the executing broker promptly.

(3). Billing.  A Clearing Member will pay all floor brokerage fees incurred
for all transactions executed by the executing broker for the customer and
subsequently accepted by the Clearing Member by means of the ATOM system.
Floor brokerage fees will be agreed upon in advance among the Clearing
Member, customer and the executing broker.

(B) Responsibilities/Obligations of Executing Brokers

(1) Customer Order Placement.  An executing broker will be responsible for
determining that all orders are placed or authorized by the customer.  Once
an order has been accepted, a broker or the broker,s clerk must:

(a) confirm the terms of the order with the customer;
(b) accurately execute the order according to its terms;
(c) confirm the execution of the order to the customer as soon as
practicable; and
(d) transmit such executed order to the Clearing Member as soon as
practicable in accordance with Exchange Rules and procedures.

2. Use of Other Persons.  Unless otherwise agreed in writing, the executing
broker is allowed to use the services of another broker in connection with
the broker,s obligations under these rules.  The executing broker remains
responsible to the customer and Clearing Member under these rules.

3.  Executing Broker Responsibility for Verifying Clearing Member
Authorization.  Prior to a broker accepting and executing an initial order
for any new customer account, the executing broker must confirm with the
Clearing Member by telephonic, electronic or written means, that:
(f) the customer has a valid account with the Clearing Member;
(g) the account number;
(h) the brokerage rate;
(i) the customer is authorized by the Clearing Member to place orders with
the executing broker for that account; and
(j) a listing or summary of persons authorized to place orders for that
account.
The executing broker must retain a copy of the authorization or the specifics
of the telephonic confirmation, which includes: opposite party, date, time,
and any other relevant information.  The falsification of such information
shall be the basis for disciplinary action.

4. Rejection of Customer Order.  Where an executing broker has confirmed
Clearing Member authorization to execute orders on behalf of a customer in
accordance with this Rule 9.11A, the broker may, in the broker,s discretion,
reject an order that the customer transmits to the broker for execution.  The
broker shall promptly notify the customer and the Clearing Member(s) of any
such rejection.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-154)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


- G

Could you send the cover letter with your revisions?  I'll go ahead and make
it specific to each counterparty.

Thanks,
Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478


Hi Christie and Alhamd,

I spoke with Mark and Steve (as Steve is the Rice contact and must be
comfortable with our donation) and we have decided that Enron's
contribution/donation will be $5K - as the ONLY difference between the $10K
and $5K donation is in the amount of complimentary passes Enron receives for
the event.  For a $10K donation we receive 10 passes and for a $5K donation
we receive.....take a guess.......you're right..... 5 complimentary passes.

If we need additional passes we should be able to leverage Rice for some as
we've given them tons of money.

Regards,

Cindy


No one is signing for CA Development today.

Ben or someone from the commercial team initials, not legal.  I just initial
the signature.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/05/2001 02:01 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Quick Question(s)

1. Who is going to sign for CA Energy Development II, LLC and for ENA?

2. Do you want to initial all of the pages of the Facility Agreement?

Also, I need you to initial the docs where Enron is signing.

Please let me know about 1 & 2.

Kathleen


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
09:08 AM ---------------------------

Jeff Richter
12/07/2000 06:31 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: DJ Cal-ISO Pays $10M To Avoid Rolling Blackouts Wed -Sources, DJ
Calif ISO, PUC Inspect Off-line Duke South Bay Pwr Plant, DJ Calif Regula
tors Visit AES,Dynegy Off-Line Power Plants

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 08:38
AM ---------------------------

Carla Hoffman
12/07/2000 06:19 AM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Matt
Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Guzman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark
Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: DJ Cal-ISO Pays $10M To Avoid Rolling Blackouts Wed -Sources, DJ
Calif ISO, PUC Inspect Off-line Duke South Bay Pwr Plant, DJ Calif Regula
tors Visit AES,Dynegy Off-Line Power Plants

---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/07/2000 06:29
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     12/07/2000 06:11 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ Cal-ISO Pays $10M To Avoid Rolling Blackouts Wed -Sources, DJ
Calif ISO, PUC Inspect Off-line Duke South Bay Pwr Plant, DJ Calif Regula
tors Visit AES,Dynegy Off-Line Power Plants

13:18 GMT 7 December 2000 DJ Cal-ISO Pays $10M To Avoid Rolling Blackouts
Wed -Sources
(This article was originally published Wednesday)
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--The California Independent System Operator paid
about $10 million Wednesday for 1,000 megawatts of power from Powerex and
still faced a massive deficit that threatened electricity reliability in the
state, high-ranking market sources familiar with the ISO's operation told
Dow Jones Newswires.
But the ISO fell short of ordering rolling blackouts Wednesday for the third
consecutive day.
The ISO wouldn't comment on the transactions, saying it is sensitive market
information. But sources said Powerex, a subsidiary of British Columbia
Hydro & Power Authority (X.BCH), is the only energy company in the Northwest
region with an abundant supply of electricity to spare and the ISO paid
about $900 a megawatt-hour from the early afternoon through the evening.
But that still wasn't enough juice.
The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power sold the ISO 1,200 megawatts
of power later in the day at the wholesale electricity price cap rate of
$250/MWh. The LADWP, which is not governed by the ISO, needs 3,800 megawatts
of power to serve its customers. It is free sell power instate above the
$250/MWh price cap.
The LADWP has been very vocal about the amount of power it has to spare. The
municipal utility has also reaped huge profits by selling its excess power
into the grid when supply is tight and prices are high. However, the LADWP
is named as a defendant in a civil lawsuit alleging price gouging. The suit
claims the LADWP sells some of its power it gets from the federal Bonneville
Power Administration, which sells hydropower at cheap rates, back into the
market at prices 10 times higher.
Powerex officials wouldn't comment on the ISO power sale, saying all
transactions are proprietary. But the company also sold the ISO 1,000
megawatts Tuesday - minutes before the ISO was to declare rolling blackouts
- for $1,100 a megawatt-hour, market sources said.
The ISO, whose main job is to keep electricity flowing throughout the state
no matter what the cost, started the day with a stage-two power emergency,
which means its operating reserves fell to less than 5%. The ISO is having
to compete with investor-owned utilities in the Northwest that are willing
to pay higher prices for power in a region where there are no price caps.
The ISO warned federal regulators, generators and utilities Wednesday during
a conference call that it would call a stage-three power emergency
Wednesday, but wouldn't order rolling blackouts. A stage three is declared
when the ISO's operating reserves fall to less than 1.5% and power is
interrupted on a statewide basis to keep the grid from collapsing.
But ISO spokesman Patrick Dorinson said it would call a stage three only as
a means of attracting additional electricity resources.
"In order to line up (more power) we have to be in a dire situation,"
Dorinson said.
Edison International unit (EIX) Southern California Edison, Sempra Energy
unit (SRE) San Diego Gas & Electric, PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas &
Electric and several municipal utilities in the state will share the cost of
the high-priced power.
SoCal Edison and PG&E are facing a debt of more than $6 billion due to high
wholesale electricity costs. The utilities debt this week could grow by
nearly $1 billion, analysts said. It's still unclear whether retail
customers will be forced to pay for the debt through higher electricity
rates or if companies will absorb the costs.
-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 07-12-00
1318GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc
13:17 GMT 7 December 2000 DJ Calif ISO, PUC Inspect Off-line Duke South Bay
Pwr Plant
(This article was originally published Wednesday)
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Representatives of the California Independent
System Operator and Public Utilities Commission inspected Duke Energy
Corp.'s (DUK) off-line 700-MW South Bay Power Plant in Chula Vista, Calif.,
Wednesday morning, a Duke spokesman said.
The ISO and PUC have been inspecting all off-line power plants in the state
since Tuesday evening to verify that those plants are shut down for the
reasons generators say they are, ISO spokesman Pat Dorinson said.
About 11,000 MW of power has been off the state's power grid since Monday,
7,000 MW of which is off-line for unplanned maintenance, according to the
ISO.
The ISO manages grid reliability.
As previously reported, the ISO told utilities and the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Wednesday that it would call a stage three power alert
at 5 PM PST (0100 GMT Thursday), meaning power reserves in the state would
dip below 1.5% and rolling blackouts could be implemented to avoid grid
collapse. However, the ISO said the action wouldn't result in rolling
blackouts.
The ISO and PUC also inspected Tuesday plants owned by Dynegy Inc (DYN),
Reliant Energy Inc. (REI) and Southern Energy Inc (SOE).
Duke's 1,500-MW Moss Landing plant was also inspected by PUC representatives
in June, when some units were off-line for repairs, the Duke spokesman said.

   -By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872;
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires 07-12-00
1317GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc
13:17 GMT 7 December 2000 =DJ Calif Regulators Visit AES,Dynegy Off-Line
Power Plants
(This article was originally published Wednesday)

   By Jessica Berthold
   Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--AES Corp. (AES) and Dynegy Inc. (DYN) said
Wednesday that representatives of California power officials had stopped by
some of their power plants to verify that they were off line for legitimate
reasons.
The California Independent System Operator, which manages the state's power
grid and one of its wholesale power markets, and the California Public
Utilities Commission began on-site inspections Tuesday night of all power
plants in the state reporting that unplanned outages have forced shutdowns,
ISO spokesman Pat Dorinson said.
The state has had 11,000 MW off the grid since Monday, 7,000 MW for
unplanned maintenance. The ISO Wednesday called a Stage 2 power emergency
for the third consecutive day, meaning power reserves were below 5% and
customers who agreed to cut power in exchange for reduced rates may be
called on to do so.
As reported earlier, Reliant Energy (REI) and Southern Energy Inc. (SOE)
said they had been visited by representatives of the ISO and PUC Tuesday
evening.
Representatives of the two organizations also visited plants owned by AES
and Dynegy Tuesday evening.
AES told the visitors they couldn't perform an unannounced full inspection
of the company's 450-megawatt Huntington Beach power station until Wednesday
morning, when the plant's full staff would be present, AES spokesman Aaron
Thomas said.
Thomas, as well as an ISO spokesman, didn't know whether the representatives
returned Wednesday for a full inspection.

   AES Units Down Due To Expired Emissions Credits

The Huntington Beach facility and units at two other AES facilities have
used up their nitrogen oxide, or NOx, emission credits. They were taken down
two weeks ago in response to a request by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District to stay off line until emissions controls are deployed,
Thomas said.
AES has about 2,000 MW, or half its maximum output, off line. The entire
Huntington plant is off line, as is 1,500 MW worth of units at its Alamitos
and Redondo Beach plants.
The ISO has asked AES to return its off line plants to operations, but AES
has refused because it is concerned the air quality district will fine the
company $20 million for polluting.
"We'd be happy to put our units back, provided we don't get sued for it,"
Thomas said. "It's not clear to us that the ISO trumps the air quality
district's" authority.
As reported, a spokesman for the air quality district said Tuesday that AES
could have elected to buy more emission credits so that it could run its off
line plants in case of power emergencies, but choose not to do so.

   Dynegy's El Segundo Plant Also Visited By PUC

Dynegy Inc. (DYN) said the PUC visited its 1,200 MW El Segundo plant Tuesday
evening, where two of the four units, about 600 MW worth, were off line
Wednesday.
"I guess our position is, 'Gee, we're sorry you don't believe us, but if you
need to come and take a look for yourself, that's fine,'" said Dynegy
spokesman Lynn Lednicky.
Lednicky said one of the two units was off line for planned maintenance and
the other for unplanned maintenance on boiler feedwater pumps, which could
pose a safety hazard if not repaired.
"We've been doing all we can to get back in service," Lednicky said. "We
even paid to have some specialized equipment expedited."
Lednicky added that the PUC seemed satisfied with Dynegy's explanation of
why its units were off line.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872,
jessica.berthold@dowjones.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 07-12-00
1317GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Hackmann, Russell" <rhackman@lehman.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:26 PM
To:	Freeland, Clint; Shackleton, Sara; Despain, Tim
Subject:	agreement

 <<Termination Agreement nov1_n1.doc>>

Russell F. Hackmann, CFA
Lehman Brothers Corporate Equity Derivatives
(201) 524-2279 phone
(917) 596-2936 cell
rhackman@lehman.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without notice.

 - Termination Agreement nov1_n1.doc


484809
kate, i talked to mike on this deal and it should be august.  i just want to
let you know to make sure it gets changed.

thanks and have a merry christmas!

kerri


461026
jeff

broker has jan 01


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000008582&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000008582
Request Create Date : 11/29/00 12:26:42 PM
Requested For       : wes.williams@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Reports
Resource Type       : Applications


I suggest you, Steve, and I make time on the p.m. of the 13th, or the a.m. of
the 14th, to discuss.  thanks for the note.   mcs

From: Mike Dahlke@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 05/03/2001 06:55 CST
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: update

Mark,

I want to give you a rundown on what has happened since we spoke nearly 3
weeks ago.

Dan Leff spoke with me this past Friday (March 2).  We had a pleasant
conversation that lasted about 20 minutes.  His suggestion was to speak with
Mark Muller, who he described as the EES "corporate development person".
Dan said he would leave Mark a voice mail message to make him aware of our
conversation.  In turn, I sent Mark a short note with my resume' and will
call him Monday when he is scheduled to return to Houston.  Oddly, I received
a voice-mail from EES Human Resources.  The caller indicated that she was
following up on my discussion with Dick Leibert.. The message from HR was
that   "currently there is no fit within Dan Leff's <organization>" based on
Dick's discussions with unnamed individuals.

Dam also felt I should talk to Lou Pai regarding Xelerator.  I wrote Lou
about 2 weeks ago but have not received any response for my request for a
meeting.  Dan suggested that I try calling but admitted that Lou responds in
his own time.

Steve felt that Sarah Davis, who is responsible for "repositioning" in HR,
would have a feel for Lou's organizational needs as well as other Enron
groups.  When I met with Sarah a week ago Friday, she said she had been
trying without success to talk with Lou.  Sarah and I reviewed my contacts in
Enron to date, which I subsequently provided her in writing.  She felt that
the groups were those that she would suggest and that in most cases the
people were appropriate as well.  Sarah was unable to keep our follow-up
appointment on Wednesday and I do not have any suggestions from her yet for
alternative contacts.  It appears she will be out of town this week and my
request to reschedule the follow-up meeting is pending.

In summary, the frustration and concern I expressed during our recent
conversations has continued.   My understanding is that you plan to be in
Houston next week and I would like to schedule some time to discuss a
resolution of my situation.

Thanks for your help and support.

Mike D.


Critical Migration Information:

1. Your scheduled Outlook Migration Date is THE EVENING OF : May 3rd
2. You need to press the "Save My Data" button (only once) to send us your
pre-migration information.
3. You must be connected to the network before you press the button.
4. If a POP-UP BOX appears, prompting you to "ABORT, CANCEL OR TRUST SIGNER"
please  select TRUST SIGNER.
5. Any information you Add to your Personal Address Book, Journal or calendar
after you click on the button will need to be manually re-added into Outlook
after you have been migrated.
6. Clicking this button does not complete your migration to Outlook. Your
migration will be completed  the evening of your migration date.

    Failure to click on the button means you WILL NOT get your Calendar,
Contacts, Journal and ToDo information imported into Outlook the day of your
migration and could result in up to a 2 week delay to restore this
information.

If you encounter any errors please contact the resolution center @
713-853-1411


just whenever.  i would rather go out as a group.


Michelle:  Could you please send me the latest form of agreement that ENA
should be using with its outside consultants?  Thanks.  If you have any
questions, please give me a call.  Sara


Following please find the Weekly Management Report and the Daily Executive
Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/17/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	5,171
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,578
Total Life to Date Transactions	451,077

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/17/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	4,632	80%
Enron Europe Limited	203	36%
Global Products	133	29%
Enron Metals	203	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	50%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	4,001,482,739
MTD	40,276,897,003
LTD	253,705,601,419
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,502,403,951

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	16,912,158,390

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	571
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	3
Number of Products Offered Today	1,182
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,821
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,760

Also attached is the Weekly Public Domain Report, containing information
which is intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron.


Lisa,

I haven't seen a copy of the Sept 28th letter yet, but I've been at an
offsite, so I might have missed something.  I'll get you a copy of CO #1.  CO
#2 has been transmitted to GE for comment.  I'll have to confirm the status
of the MOU and CO#3/#4.  These have bounced around a bit, so I need to nail
it down so I don't give you bad information.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lisa Bills                           10/06/2000 10:33 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Sarah Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Catherine Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: LM6000 Change Orders

Kay, I was hoping you could provide me with executed copies of Change Orders
1 and 2 and the September 28th letter agreement regarding Enron's title
acceptance of units 1-6 and 9-14.  I need to provide them to WestLB as the
ADA requires prompt delivery to them of executed contracts.

Also, where do we stand on Change Orders 3 and 4 and the ENA/ESA "MOU"?  I
know that the last I heard Sheila was working the MOU, but I thought you
mights know as I am writing to you.

Thanks, Lisa


Sorry for the delay - we won't be able to go with you tomorrow night - hope
you have fun anyway!

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Marc.R.Cutler@BankAmerica.com                           03/02/99 01:37
PM

To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: Personal-

Mark,
We're going to the Vince Gill concert on Thursday night, and the persons
that were joining us had to go out of town.  Let me know if you would like
to join us (2 tickets).

Marc


Sara:
I have not worked with Stikeman but Shari has.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton
	07/26/00 06:46 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Stikeman, Elliott

Carol:  Peter del Vecchio is looking for Canadian counsel in connection with
a paper acquisition and inquired about Stikeman.  Have you worked with any of
their lawyers (perhaps on the Canadian cash collateralization issue)?


Attention Blackberry User:

You are receiving this notification to alert you that e-mail services to your Blackberry device will be unavailable between the hours of  8:45 a.m. and 12 midnight CST on Sunday, November 25th for maintenance.  During this outage, email services to the Blackberry handheld will be interrupted, however, pin-to-pin paging will not be affected.  If you have additional questions regarding this outage, please contact the North American Resolution Center at 713-853-1411.

Thanks for your cooperation and understanding,

Enron Global Messaging