Well, it's Mid October and I am checking on the status of the SBA Priority during Allocations.  The new contracts are due to take effect November 1, 2001, and with cold weather already on the horizon we could be headed for the same types of problems we had last  winter.

Do you have an estimated time of implementation?  Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help.

Thank you for your help.
Reyna

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cabrera, Reyna
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:42 PM
To:	Medeles, Gerry
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

Thank you Gerry...I'll email you again in Mid October.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Medeles, Gerry
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Cabrera, Reyna; Kirk, Steve; Neville, Sue; Miller, Kent
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Black, Legale ; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

I have worked up the requirements and the TMS IT group is evaluating the changes.  Due to the CMS implementation we would not be able to implement this change.  The earliest we might be able to implement is Mid to late October.  If you have any questions please call.  Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cabrera, Reyna
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Kirk, Steve; Neville, Sue; Miller, Kent
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Black, Legale ; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

Gerry/Legale,

Would you be able to update us on the status of the SBA priority during Allocations?  September 1st has rolled around really fast.

Thanks,
Reyna

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kirk, Steve
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Cabrera, Reyna; Neville, Sue; Miller, Kent
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Black, Legale ; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

Reyna,  this is to confirm that the SBA-TI's should be scheduled after primary but before all other nominations.  sjk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cabrera, Reyna
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:50 AM
To:	Kirk, Steve; Neville, Sue; Miller, Kent
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Black, Legale ; January, Steven
Subject:	FW: SBA Priority during Allocations

Steve,
Back in June we discussed the issue of the SBAs' priority during an Allocation.  The Business Development group and Contracts are in the process of making the necessary changes so that CMS can distinguish ITs associated with SBA activity from other IT agreements and are second through the meter after Primary during allocations.  For your information, below are the comments from the various people involved in this issue

Please let us know if you have any further concerns regarding this issue.  Thanks for your continued help in this matter.

Reyna Cabrera
X33072

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bodnar, Michael
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:47 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Cabrera, Reyna; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

I believe Reyna, et al, have held discussions with the Reg Types and received the green light to go forward, but I will confirm.

Regarding (2.), With the new contract system being developed, the monitoring of contract provisions via the system should be do-able. I am sure both CMS and TMS will be involved in the effort.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:19 AM
To:	Bodnar, Michael
Cc:	Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Cabrera, Reyna; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

	Mike, thanks for the update.  I have a couple of questions/comments:

	1.  Is Legal and Regulatory in the loop on these decisions?

	2.  Anything we can automate, I would like to ensure we have the automation on the enhancement
	     list.  I like the idea of automating the last bullet.  I am not sure if it is in CMS or elsewhere, but
	     I would like to be sure we pursue this automation.
	Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bodnar, Michael
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Cabrera, Reyna
Subject:	FW: SBA Priority during Allocations

Lynn,
Below is a list of issues that were raised at the meeting held w/ Gerry and Reyna (attended by John and I) ......As far as I know, we haven't yet heard back from Sue regarding the issues raised.

....Immediately below is LT's response to adding a "hook" in CMS that would distinguish ITs associated with SBA activity from other IT agreements....

More as it develops!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Trevino, Linda
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 8:41 AM
To:	Cabrera, Reyna; Bodnar, Michael
Subject:	RE: SBA Priority during Allocations

I don't have a problem adding a subtype on the IT's of SBA.  I'm not sure I understand your last bullet. Can you give me more info.

LT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cabrera, Reyna
Sent:	Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:32 PM
To:	Neville, Sue; Medeles, Gerry
Cc:	Threet, Kay; Bodnar, Michael; Trevino, Linda
Subject:	SBA Priority during Allocations

Sue,
During the meeting today with Gerry to discuss the SBA priority during allocations, some of the following issues came up:  (Gerry, correct me if I misunderstood anything)

If we ever call an SBA to bring in gas after the timely cycle, do we still want them to have priority over Alternate and Interruptible? (my opinion is no, they should only have this priority during the timely cycle).
If the SBAs bring in gas at a secondary point, do we still want them to have priority over Alternate and Interruptible?  (my opinion is no, they should only have this priority at Primary Points).
Are we aware that an Alternate shipper who has flowing rights from the previous day might get "squeezed" out of the same entitlement on a day that an SBA shipper is given priority over Alternate?  Might have some mad shippers.
How will SBA volumes be posted on the EBB if there is an allocation: Interruptible???
Because the current methodology for allocation is based on a "point", they don't follow the downstream, will the IT contracts currently being used have to be identified through the contracts department as "SBA IT"?
This is for the future contracts system:  Should we ask that the new contract system to automate all the manual processes of the SBAs such as account balance and carryover days in order for the system to be able to validate this criteria?

Reyna Cabrera
(713) 853-3072


===================================================

Recommend emails are a powerful way to get investment tips as they happen
from the ClearStation community. If you would like to UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
http://clearstation.etrade.com/doc/unsub_kensey.html

*NOTE : DO NOT reply to this email. Replies should be made within 'Discuss'
at the url given below.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
'kensey' has removed CTXS (Doink) at Jan  7 2002 10:54PM

Citrix Systems ( NASDAQ : CTXS )
Computer - Software : 1 new highs in group of 234

Symbol       Last     Time     Change     High      Low     Volume
-----        ----     ----      -----     ----      ---      -----
CTXS        22.98   6:37PM      -0.25    23.71    22.88  3,180,000

Community Take
--------------
270 Long / 8 Short

'kensey' said:
Mon Jan 7 19:51:08 2002

remove CTXS long from recommend list.  trade turning flat.  like, real real flat.

recommended CTXS Long on Nov 21 2001 when it was trading at 20 3/4. Since then it's gone up 10.75%.

kensey

See the annotated graph of this recommendation at:

http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/bbs?Cmd=post&post_id=2815976
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Recommend emails are a powerful way to get investment tips as they happen
from the ClearStation community. If you would like to UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
http://clearstation.etrade.com/doc/unsub_kensey.html

ClearStation is not an investment advisory service,
nor a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer and
does not purport to tell or suggest which securities
members should buy or sell for themselves. Members should
always check with their licensed financial advisor
and their tax advisor to determine the suitability of
any investment.
ClearStation, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
E*TRADE Group, Inc. and an affiliate of E*TRADE
Securities, Inc. and E*TRADE Bank. E*TRADE Securities,
Inc. and E*TRADE Bank are wholly-owned subsidiaries of
E*TRADE Group, Inc. E*TRADE Bank deposits are insured up
to $100,000 by the FDIC. E*TRADE Bank and E*TRADE
Securities, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.
E*TRADE brokerage accounts are maintained by E*TRADE
Securities, Inc. Products offered by E*TRADE Securities,
Inc. are not insured by the FDIC, are not deposits or
obligations of E*TRADE Bank, are subject to investment
risk, including possible loss of principal invested.
ClearStation is a registered trademark of ClearStation, Inc.
E*TRADE is a registered trademark of E*TRADE Securities,
Inc. Member NASD/SIPC.
Copyright (c) 2000. ClearStation, Inc. All rights reserved.


Final Reminder

If you are a participant in the Enron Corp. Savings Plan, all trades among your investment funds must be completed by 3:00 PM CST Friday, October 26.

The makeup of your investment funds in the Savings Plan at 3:00 p.m., October 26, will reflect your investment decision for the duration of the transition period.


this needs to be sent on to leboeuf people.
think you have the appropriate names asid from john and jon.

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
----- Forwarded by Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT on 07/14/2000 01:40 PM -----

	Gary Keevill@ENRON
	07/11/2000 06:33 PM

		 To: Bob Licato/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, Art Stappenbeck/ECP/Enron@Enron, Cliff
Evans/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christine Lee/HOU/ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ain@worldnet.att.net, "Joe Bollinger" <joebollinger@earthlink.net>,
TMGeiger@bigplanet.com, Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Infineum Lawsuit Defense

I asked Tom Geiger to capture some preliminary thoughts/strategies on a
counter-suit to Infineum's lawsuit.  The attached memo highlights a breech of
contract strategy.  The steam take data that Tom based his memo on is
contained in the attached spreadsheet.  Please review for discussion at
future meetings and/or conference calls.


Since ETS has third party debt on it's books, the debt and cost of carry will
be excluded from the calculation so as not to double count.

Rick wants it to actualy be booked.  I lean towards just calculating it and
not actually make entries (I know that entries will cause all sorts of
additional issues).   Nothing has been formalized yet.

Rod Hayslett

11/22/2000 11:01 AM
To: Tod A Lindholm/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Capital Charge and Calculating Return on Invested Capital

What do we do with debt on the books of the entities?  Ignore it?   And my
understanding is that this will not be used for actual booking of anything
in the books,

Tod A Lindholm
11/22/2000 10:31 AM
To: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, John Echols/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mark E Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kent Castleman/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey E Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carol
Howes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Howard Selzer/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Keith Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dave
Gunther/NA/Enron@Enron, Kenny Bickett/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, MARY
TURINA/ENRON@enronxgate, Barry Schnapper/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul
Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeremy Thirsk/SIN/ECT@ECT,
Ananda Mukerji/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen H
Friedlander/EWC/Enron@Enron, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry
Derrett/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Howard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Michael Anderson/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Bill W Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim DeSpain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Butts/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Lynne
Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maroun J Abboudy/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike Deville/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Capital Charge and Calculating Return on Invested Capital

Over the last few months, we have been working on a new methodology to
measure and report business unit's retrurns on invested capital.   Several
different variations were considered, and I am glad to report that Skilling,
Causey and Fastow have approved the process outlined here.

Simply stated (with an example shown below):  Return on equity will be
calculated based on a pre-determined debt/equity structure.  Business unit
capital will include both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet uses of
capital and business unit's will be charged for the cost of their debt at
Enron's cost of funds.  Business unit's should focus on improving their
return on equity over time.

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________

This metric will not replace other targets (i.e., IBIT and Funds Flow).

We are currently working to overlay this approach to the submitted 2001
Plans.  If you have questions, please contact myself or Mike Deville.


Well, I'm glad I get to edit!  Not really.

Mark approved it this am.  Hopefully, good publicity which will make Mark
glad he approved it.  They usually take pictures to go with the article, so I
have to see if I need a new, clean, white shirt.  Gotta look good! Makeup and
everything.  Wonder how I lose 15 lbs by Thursday?

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 03/13/2001 11:36:02 AM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Roundtable

Way cool! I hope you get it ok'ed. So what do you think about having your
thoughts published for all to read? NM

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 8:30 AM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject: Roundtable

FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/13/2001 08:29
AM ---------------------------

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 03/12/2001 04:46:52 PM

To:   "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Cogan, John" <JCogan@KSLAW.com>, "LaFollette, Chris"
      <CLaFollette@KSLAW.com>, "Coley, Randy" <RColey@KSLAW.com>

Subject:  Roundtable

Dear Kay,

Confirming our discussion, The Texas Lawyer has asked King & Spalding to
organize a Roundtable Discussion of lawyers and business people to discuss
how the two professions relate to each other in the context of complex
business transactions.

The Roundtable would take place privately in a conference room in our
offices with a court reporter recording the discussion, which would then be
published in an upcoming issue of the newspaper. Participants will have the
opportunity to edit their remarks before they are published. John Cogan
will
be co-chairman of the proceedings with our partner, Chris LaFollette.  I
unfortunately cannot attend as I will be out of town.

The Discussion will take place on Thursday, March 15, from 2 to 3:30. We
will hold a planning session over lunch in one of our conference rooms from
12:30 to 2. No other preparation would be required.

You would be a terrific representative from Enron to join us and provide
Enron's perspective. Please confirm your attendance as soon as you get the
internal approvals by calling John Cogan at 713.276.7371 or by e-mail at
jcogan@kslaw.com.

Best regards,
John

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Would either of you be responsible on the ENA side for signing an "Assignment
of Gas Contract?"  Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Leslie Robinson/Corp/Enron on 04/24/2001
04:06 PM ---------------------------
Linda S Bryan @ ECT   04/24/2001 04:19 PM

To: Leslie Robinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Contract Assignment

I believe that it would either be Scott Neal or Hunter Shively.

Did you find an unexecuted copy of the assignment?

Linda

Leslie Robinson@ENRON
04/24/2001 04:01 PM
To: Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Contract Assignment

Sylvia/Linda, do either of you know who on the ENA side would be responsible
for signing an "Assignment of Gas Contract?"  HPL assigned it's expense
contract with TXU Fuel Company to ENA, and I have the paperwork in front of
me.  Thanks.


Hector,

I invitate you touch my big, beautiful, American breasts!

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 02:39 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Carrie Southard                           06/30/2000 02:35 PM

To: Christa Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M
Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Misti Day/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole
Alvino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ashley Dietz/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jennifer Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle
Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erin Rice/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Going To London!

Hi Everyone,

Well, it's official.  I am finally making the final arrangements for my move
to London!  I leave Friday, July 14th, but before I go I would like to throw
a going away bash.  It's been awhile since we've all been out together so I
hope you can make it.  I am sure that I have forgotten people, so please
forward the email on.

The festivities will commence at my apartment next Friday, July 7th....at my
apartment.  I'll be providing beer and wine but feel free to bring your
favorite beverage.  I live a block away from the Galant Knight...if you can't
make it to the apartment, meet up with us at the Galant Knight on Holcombe.

I live at 7777 Greenbriar #3056.  My gate code is 284.  If you need
directions, leave me a message on my voice mail and I'll call you
back...since I will out on vacation for most of next week.

I hope to see you all!

Carrie


System:  Production Interface Server (SPR1INF1)

Outage Abstract:   	Production Interface Server Outage
Outage Description:  	Production Interface Server Outage due to emergency
maintenance.
Outage Implication:   	Server will be unavailable.
Contact Name:  	Tracy Terrell   Contact Number: 888-610-8937


I'll be there...


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/15/2000
05:04 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 12/15/2000 04:53:24 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp121800.pdf


OUTLOOK EMAIL NOTIFICATION

Your Date of Migration is: May 14th

YOU WILL BE UNABLE TO SEND E-MAIL unless you take the following action:
Please go through your Notes email and clean out as many old/un-needed email
items as possible BEFORE your date of migration.? After you are migrated to
Outlook you will only be allocated 100MB of total Mailbox space.?? If more
than this amount of data is migrated to Outlook YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEND
E-MAIL until it is below the 100MB limit.? Cleaning up your Notes email now
will prevent this from happening to YOU.

Enron,s messaging platform is migrating from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook
2000 worldwide.  You will be accessing Outlook for all of your email
functions.

WHY IS ENRON MIGRATING TO OUTLOOK 2000?

Many factors contributed to the decision to migrate from Lotus Notes to
Microsoft Exchange/Outlook.  The most prominent factors were:

? Significant advantages to moving to a product that is more integrated with
current Enron apps (Windows 2000, Office and Internet Explorer)
? More efficient Shared PC and Roaming User features
? Improved support and integration for Palm/CE devices
? Instant Messaging capabilities

WHAT IS BEING MIGRATED TO OUTLOOK 2000?

? Email Messages.  From the date of your scheduled migration, the last (30)
thirty days of your Email will be converted for use in Outlook.
? All your folders in Notes you use to store email messages in.
? To Do Items
? Journal Items
? Calendar Entries dating from (1) one year in the past to (10) ten years in
the future will be converted.
? Address Books, but NOT your Distribution Lists that you created.  You will
need to re-create these in Outlook.

Thank you,

Outlook 2000 Migration Team


Great!  I'll arrange it with Donna!   Melinda arranged the video conference
on 32.  See you there!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001
10:23 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
01/24/2001 09:47 AM
To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Mid-Project Review dates-Enron

Christie,

Feb the 20th is the best time for me.

Vince

Christie Patrick
01/23/2001 11:29 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Mid-Project Review dates-Enron

Hi Vince!

The best dates for me are the 16th or the 20th.

Please let me know!

Thanks!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
11:29 PM ---------------------------

FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/23/2001 11:46:32 AM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>, "'christie.patrick@enron.com'"
<christie.patrick@enron.com>
cc: FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: Mid-Project Review dates-Enron

Tiger Hosts:

This is a reminder that the deadline for setting up the Mid-Project review
dates for your Tiger Team is Friday, Jan 26.
The following are the remaining available dates/times.  Please let me know
what works best for you at your earliest convenience.

Monday, Feb 12    4:30-6:30  or 6:30-8:30

Tuesday, Feb 13   4:30-6:30  or 6:30-8:30

Wed., Feb 14        4:30-6:30  or 6:30-8:30

Friday, Feb 16      10:00-12:00  or 6:30-8:30

Tuesday, Feb 20   6:30-8:30

Again, this will be based on a first come-first serve basis. You may come to
campus or this can be done by videoconference.  If you choose the latter,
please provide to me a call-in number for the conference.

Any questions, please contact the FAP office.

Donna Piazze
Program Director
Field Application Project
The Wharton School
Univ. of Pennsylvania
215.573.8394   fax 215.573.5727
fap@management.wharton.upenn.edu
piazze@wharton.upenn.edu


F.Y.I.

-----Original Message-----
From: webmaster@cera.com [mailto:webmaster@cera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:03 PM
To: clients@cera.com
Subject: Natural Gas Prices Rebound as Heating Season Approaches - CERA
Monthly Briefing

Title: Monthly Gas Briefing: A Shift Toward Winter
URL(s):

http://www20.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2748;

***********************************************************************

NATURAL GAS PRICES REBOUND AS HEATING SEASON APPROACHES

Despite high storage levels, with heating season coming, the Henry Hub cash
market has bounced back from early October lows to levels near $2.40 per MMBtu.
However, weak market fundamentals, including a sluggish economy and increased
US and Canadian supplies, will mitigate the usual winter price rise. CERA
expects an average Henry Hub price of $2.35 in November.

*  Although inventories are close to record levels, storage pressures are
increasingly unlikely to drive cash markets down significantly this year.

*  Gas demand will average 14 percent lower than a year earlier; residential
and commercial sectors show a decline with a return to normal weather, while a
weak economy offsets the return of ammonia and dual-fuel loads in the
industrial sector.

*  Regional storage inventories and weak regional demand should keep upward
pressure off of regional differentials. The Northeast examines security issues
around LNG shipments.

**end**

Follow above URL for complete report (6 printed pages).

E-mail Category: Monthly Briefing
CERA Knowledge Area(s): North American Gas

***********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
CERA's Autumn 2001 Roundtable event dates and agendas
are now available at http://www20.cera.com/event
***********************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www20.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www20.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Is it per game or point or what?

Liz M Taylor
07/17/2000 02:33 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen R Horn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Racicot/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: "Strike Out" ALS

Enron/MDA
Beach Bowl 2000
To Benefit ALS Research

I'm bowling to help "strike out" ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease).  If you have not
sponsored someone else, I would very much like for you to sponsor me.  The
event takes place on July 29.  I will need all donations by July 26.

Any donation is greatly appreciated and matched by Enron.

Many Thanks,

Liz


This weekend marks the first employee move into our new office building, Enron Center South.

Approximately 400 Enron Global Markets employees will occupy the building's 3rd floor next Monday.  In the ensuing six weeks another 1,500 employees from Enron Industrial Markets, Enron Net Works, and our Power and Gas Marketers will follow, occupying levels 4, 5, and 6.

We know all employees are curious to experience this exciting new space.  HOWEVER, since Enron only has an occupancy permit for these specific floors, including limited access corridors from the skywalk, we ask that:

ONLY EMPLOYEES WHO ARE ASSIGNED OFFICE SPACE IN THE NEW BUILDING AND EMPLOYEES WITH STRICT BUSINESS NEEDS TO ACCESS OCCUPIED SPACE ARE PERMITTED TO BE IN THE NEW BUILDING.

Your compliance is appreciated and will assist in our ability to effectively conduct business by not over crowding newly occupied areas with visitors.  In addition, the balance of the building remains under construction and employees are strictly prohibited from entering these areas.

We are planning an open house in late Nov. or early Dec. so that every employee has the opportunity to see for themselves what is truly a world class commercial trading environment.  Thank you for your cooperation.

Office of the Chairman


The last few lines  :->)

-----Original Message-----
From: djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
[mailto:djcustomclips@djinteractive.com]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:22 PM
To: 168842@mailman.enron.com
Subject: Rahil Jafry: POWER POINTS: Skilling Moves On To Charities,
Family

POWER POINTS: Skilling Moves On To Charities, Family
By Mark Golden

08/24/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Jeff Skilling will be spending the next few years
working with charities in Houston and spending time with family, the former
chief executive of Enron Corp. (ENE) said in an interview.

  The 47-year-old Skilling, who resigned abruptly from Enron after the
company's board meeting Aug. 14, repeatedly said he had left - as stated - for
personal reasons. Wall Street has been skeptical of the explanation, and
several analysts have said they're waiting for "the other shoe to drop." The
company's stock price fell 14% in response to the announcement last week - a
loss of about $4.5 billion in shareholder value - and hasn't recovered this
week.
  But the former chief executive said the stock price will recover once
investors see that his departure isn't a precursor to more bad news for the
company.

  "I've spent the last 34 years working really hard," said Skilling, who
requested the interview with Dow Jones Newswires. "There are a lot of things
that I haven't been doing - personal interests, spending time with family.
There are a number of charitable things that I haven't spent the time on that
I believe I should. I don't mean fundraising, but hands on, getting out and
doing things, building houses, helping individuals."

  Skilling, who has been involved with a multiple sclerosis charity for years,
said he plans to get involved in promoting the City of Houston.

  "It's massively underrated as a place to work and live," he said. "It's a
great city, and I think I can do a lot to get that across."

  Though insistent that there is nothing more to his departure than personal
reasons, Skilling said little to reveal why a talented executive would
surrender the top spot of the country's largest energy trading company just
six months after taking the job. Skilling had been Enron's No. 2 executive
from 1997 until this year, and he's generally credited with the success of
Enron's wholesale trading operations, which comprise about 80% of the parent's
earnings.

  He confirmed there's no crisis in his family, and his health is fine.
Skilling, who assumed the chief executive title on Feb. 12, also denied that
he was suffering under the strain of the job.

  Late last week, Chairman Kenneth Lay and other Enron executives in New York
told Wall Street analysts that Skilling had been going "kind of nuts" under
the pressure of being chief executive, one analyst said.

  "It's not true that I was cracking up," he said. "Do I sound like someone
who is cracking up? The representation of me as thick-skinned is a reasonable
representation."

  When asked if his departure could have been handled more smoothly so as not
to alarm investors, Skilling said that perhaps the mechanics could have been
better, but said that is hindsight.

  "We thought it through and thought we were going about it in the right way,"
he said. "I don't know what we could have done differently. It will turn out,
in retrospect, fine, as soon as people see that there's nothing else."

   About One Week's Notice

  The former chief executive totally disagreed with speculation in this column
last week that Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay, who immediately resumed the role of
chief executive, may have wanted to regain day-to-day control of the company
and pushed Skilling out.

  "I think the world of Ken. You can't find a bigger fan of his than me," he
said. "I was not forced out. Personal and family reasons are 100% of the
story. I guess it's kind of mundane, and I'm sorry it doesn't have as much
drama and suspense as a lot of people would like it to have, but that's what
the deal is."

  Skilling said he spoke with Lay about wanting to do other things many times
over the years. The first serious discussion of his imminent departure came
about a week before the announcement, said Skilling, whose recollection of his
giving notice to Lay was somewhat cloudy.

  "The board knew what was going on, and that was the point (the Aug. 14 board
meeting) where the decisions were going to be made," he said.

  The decisions?

  "I guess to accept my resignation," Skilling said.

  Enron refused to release a copy of the minutes of the Aug. 14 board meeting,
which was regularly scheduled. The company doesn't generally release
board-meeting minutes, spokeswoman Karen Denne said.

  The former chief executive continues to work as a paid adviser to Enron. A
clause in his contract prevents him from competing with the company through
the end of 2003, and he has no plans to work outside the energy industry.

  That might sound like a big comedown from running the country's most
aggressive energy company, but Skilling said the move fits.

  "Some people say 'Well, you were working and aspiring so long to become CEO
of Enron.' That's not true. I was working to build a business, and we did,"
said Skilling, who is credited with transforming the company into a trading
powerhouse.

  "The company I built is doing great. My life is moving on."

  He also said the company will do fine without him. Some analysts have
expressed concern about Enron's ability to retain its top talent. Skilling's
predecessor as Enron's No. 2 executive, Richard Kinder, for example, left the
company in 1996 after Lay announced that he would be retaining the chief
executive spot for another five years. Kinder went on to buy Enron's small
liquids pipeline business and turned that company into Kinder-Morgan Inc.
(KMI).

  Enron's current management, Skilling said, has a "very deep bench." For
example, he described Enron Energy Services Chief Executive Dave Delaney as
"awesome."

  "Dave created the Canadian business in Enron," Skilling said.

  -By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com

Folder Name: Rahil Jafry
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 79

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


I really don't know.  It got close I understand wed am but unless they are still keeping a lot of secrets we should last beyond monday.   I haven't heard anything different.

-----Original Message-----
From: McCarty, Danny
Sent: Wed 11/21/2001 8:01 PM
To: Hayslett, Rod
Cc:
Subject:

Rod,
    What is going on?  Every day there is something new, different, and bad about us. Now, the rumor in Houston is that we are filing Ch. 11 on Monday. Is everything out, or is there more to come (Kilmer is about ready to blow an artery)?  Still views that Mark is out, Greg is temporary, and Stan is here for the Company for better or worse. What do you hear?

Dan
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 03:20
PM ---------------------------

hherzog@columbiaenergygroup.com on 08/01/2000 08:55:15 AM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *Herzog, Hans" <hherzog@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Dalphon,
Charles" <cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Jones, Donna"
<djones1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Destephanis, Kara"
<kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *cfrankl2@enron.com"
<cfrankl2@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com" <vversen@enron.com>, " -
*cindy.vachuska@enron.com" <cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " -
*cora_pendergrass@enron.com" <cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " -
*mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>, " - *scott.goodell@enron.com"
<scott.goodell@enron.com>, " - *steve.gillespie@enron.com"
<steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " - *cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " -
*despey@enron.com" <despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com"
<joann.collins@enron.com>, " - *Kinney, Doug"
<dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: CES Daily for Aug'00 Requirements for 8/1/00 and after

The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for 8/1and  the
following day(s) as listed .    There are three  worksheets labelled as
follows:

'Total Reqs':  Contains the volumes that CES is requesting from Enron at each
of the delivery points and dates indicated in the columns labelled "NOM".
The
Enron schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed
at
a specific point.   The AGL volumes are not timely and should be ignored until
further notice.    CES schedulers note:  the attached file is archived on
P:\Energy Ops\Enron\May_00\Daily\ *.xls, so you don't have to save a duplicate
copy elsewhere on the network.
'Daily Change' :  shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in the daily volume
needed from Enron at the designated citygate delivery point relative to the
supply volumes arranged previously with Enron prior to the current date.  For
the current gas day, the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using
the previous day's volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current
gas
day is 3/28, then the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for
3/28.  Note that this procedure assumes that the prior day supply change was
in
fact effectuated).  For tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the
change is computed as the latest Dth Nomination requirement less the
First-of-the-month supply volume plus or minus any adjustments made since the
first-of-the-month to the FOM supply for the (future) days shown.  (e.g., If
today is 3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect
to
the first-of-the-month volumes for those days adjusted for any additional
purchases or sell-backs since the first-of-the-month thru 3/27.)   This sheet
should be useful in determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that
we
take or turn back.   The column labelled "ENA Daily Swing +/- vs FOM volume'
shows the absolute magnitude of the daily swings allowed by ENA at
pre-specified prices.  Prices for Swing volumes exceeding these magnitudes or
for swings at delivery points without pre-specified pricing must be
negotiated.
'Comments':   Contains comments on selected items on various days.

Hans Herzog
ph: 703 561 6331
fax: 703 561 7317

 - 08-01-00 daily vols.xls


I will have Greg Johnston review the list.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 7:29 PM
To:	Crawford, Sharon
Subject:	RE:

Sharon, did one of the Canadian lawyers look at the list for the things you could not identify?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crawford, Sharon
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 6:12 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	RE:

Tana, the Master Firm Gas P/S Agreement which I forwarded to you earlier is the 3rd last agreement on their list [so I'm not sure what #1 on their list is].  I'm not sure what the 2nd and 3rd agreements on their list are either.

We do, however, have an Interruptible Agreement dated May 26/94 [not on their list] and a Firm (<31 Day) Gas P/S Agreement dated August 1/94 [which is, I think, #5 on their list] with Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd. (now BP Canada Energy Company).  Do you want copies of these agreements?

I don't know what the other agreements are.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 3:25 PM
To:	Crawford, Sharon
Cc:	Keohane, Peter
Subject:

 << File: BP Canada Enron contract list.doc >>

Sharon,

BP prepared a list of all the agreements they thought we had in place.  You might want to do a quick check and make sure that you are not missing any Canadian contracts they might have listed on this list.

THANKS FOR YOUR QUICK RESPONSE!


While the Purchase and Sale Agreement has not yet settled down, we would like
to have the Schedules as complete as possible to date.  We would appreciate
your submitting any remaining additions, deletions or corrections to the
Schedules no later than noon on Monday.  Thanks for all the help.  Lance.


Teco Tap       35.000 / Enron


You have received this email because you are listed as a data approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000082182&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000082182
Request Create Date : 2/4/02 9:06:52 AM
Requested For       : bryan.delahoussaye@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production West Edit Deal Compliance
Resource Type       : Applications


I unfortunately will not be here Friday.  What does next week look like for
you?  I didn't know you were married.  Congrats man.  Let me know.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Hunter.S.Shively@enron.com [mailto:Hunter.S.Shively@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 3:00 PM
To: paul.margraves@ubspainewebber.com
Subject: RE:

Friday may be best.  I need to check with the wife.

Hunter

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Margraves, Paul" <paul.margraves@ubspainewebber.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Margraves+2C+20Paul+22+20+3Cpaul+2Emargraves+40ubspain
ewebber+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Tuesday, May 08, 2001 9:08 AM
   To:     Shively, Hunter S.
   Subject:

   Hunter:

   Just checking up with you; it's been a while.  Do you have time to go
   get a
   beer after work tomorrow?  Let me know.

   Paul Margraves
   713-654-0348

   Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions: Please
   do not transmit orders and/or instructions regarding your
   PaineWebber account(s) by e-mail. Orders and/or instructions
   transmitted by e-mail will not be accepted by PaineWebber and
   PaineWebber will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
   and/or instructions.  Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
   PaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
   all e-mail communications sent and/or received by its employees.

Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions: Please
do not transmit orders and/or instructions regarding your
PaineWebber account(s) by e-mail. Orders and/or instructions
transmitted by e-mail will not be accepted by PaineWebber and
PaineWebber will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.  Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
PaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and review the content of
all e-mail communications sent and/or received by its employees.


Thanks for the email.  Actually, you are completely wrong about my view of
Joe.  He has tremedous integrity, and is a very strong team builder, and has
added much value to our organization.  I was however a little surprised by
your move to go from a trading position to an analysis position.  I would
have been thrilled to have you help me design a position for you in that kind
of capacity here, or in london, or elsewhere if you liked.  In addition, I
could have talked to you about a junior trading spot in crude and products.
(Which I will remind you about frequently)

I'm sure your decision will prove valuable to Joe, and hopefully to you as
well.  Mike and I would like to see you back on the A-team though--we both
respect your business sense.

As far as the guilt thing goes, I can't help you.  I'm Jewish and our people
have suffered much longer than everyone else combined.

Jeff


Daren - I have flow at one meter with no nom in November and overflow on Dec.
1.

 Meter  last deal # last month of activity counterparty

 1351  274772  Oct 00   Williams Terminals Holdings

 1603  380664  Nov 00   Hilcorp Energy  (overflow from Nov)

Please let me know if you create a deal for meter 1351 and if you extend the
deal for meter 1603.

Thanks.

Aimee


the Cayman Islands

We're leaving in about a 1/2 hour for the airport and I am extremely excited about the trip.  I will be sure to take lots of pictures and drink many fruity drinks.  Actually, I'm going scuba diving tomorrow and then we're taking a catamaran on Saturday out to some island (I will be taking full advantage of the sunning net for the trip out to the island).  Additionally, we've got first class dinners booked every night and I should be able to fit in a massage...I know, it's sick.

Also, I'm sure you noticed that I emailed Niclas about you so the door has been cracked open...Just a warning though, based on a Tuesday night conversation with Lisa I'm afraid our dear Mitch may be biting the dust soon.  We'll see though, she has become very flighty (okay, is flighty) when it comes to guys.

Sue


sorry,,,your names were top on the list....but the computer didn't
"recongize" them????  weird.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 04/26/2000
01:42 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Cynthia Sandherr                           04/26/2000 01:33 PM

To: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: dwatkis@barcepatt.com, awenner@velaw.com

Subject: draft Gramm-Schumer Electricity bill

Today, by either fax, messenger, or hand-delivery, you will receive the 37
page draft electricity deregulation bill to be introduced next week by
Senators Gramm (R-TX) and Schumer (D-NY).  We have until Friday, April 28th,
3:00p.m. EST to offer our legal technical changes.  If you can return your
comments to me (hand-written comments on the document itself are fine), I
will communicate them directly to the Senators' offices.

WE MUST KEEP THIS DOCUMENT COMPLETELY CONFIDENTIAL FOR OUR INTERNAL USE
ONLY.  WE SHOULD NOT COMMENT TO PRESS OR OTHERS THAT WE KNOW THE DOCUMENT
EXISTS, NOR SHOULD WE DISCUSS THAT WE ASSISTED IN ITS WRITING.  THE POLITICS
REQUIRE THIS COURSE OF ACTION.

Next week, after the bill is introduced, I recommend we make public comment
in support of the legislation as it continues to move the process forward
towards bill enactment this Congress.

The bill contains a date certain of 1/1/2002; stranded cost recovery
language; PURPA 210 repeal, the bundled FERC authority for interstate
transmission and reliability plus the non-discrimination language we
successfully lobbied for and about which Congressman Barton is already aware
of Senator Gramm's support for Enron's position, PUHCA repeal, environmental
conditionality and tax provisions for publics, coop's and nuclear
decommissioning.  Although we successfully drafted and communicated our
transmission language to the Senators, their attorneys have made language
adjustments (pride of authorship) which our attorneys should confirm have not
caused material defect.  If so, we can suggest drafting changes by this
Friday.

All the language you have has been agreed to by both Senators.  The section
missing, the environmental provision, is the last section the two men will
work out this week and will be essential to final bill passage.  Their goal
remains addressing the grandfathered coal facilities and their disagreements
are technical in nature.  Namely:  do you disqualify pre-1971 constructed
coal facilities at a percentage responsible for a percentage of emissions (a
Republican approach) or do you qualify facilities which can operate ( a
regulatory approach favored by the Democrats)?  With the Bush/Gore
Presidential race in full swing, this issue brings ramifications and politics
to bear at the highest level.

As a further update on this issue:  tomorrow the Senate holds a hearing on
this issue with all four of the FERC Commissioners testifying, the
Mid-American group and the DOE Pro-Competition Stakeholder group are meeting
with each other to gain further consensus, plus both are meeting with NARUC's
Chuck Grey and Chris Mele to seek consensus.  I will attend all these
meetings for Enron and report back our continued progress.  Further, we are
scheduling Dr. Tabors and Enron's Bob Schultz for a Congressional Hill
briefing next week to discuss Dr. Tabors' research on the price spike as
proof Congress must make structural changes to the interstate rules plus
demonstrate Enron On-Line's ability to show market price inefficiency.
Finally, we will participate in a "team drafting" exercise with MidAmerican
on their compromise right of first refusal transmission language with Dan
Watkiss as our representative, with others represented by Bill Sherman, Besty
Moler and Randy Davis.  This is an effort to include the Bennett Johnston ACE
group into the MidAmerican fold.  We did get MidAmerican to add the
separation of market and transmission function language in the context of the
RTO language.

Much progress continues even though the House is not in session this week.
The month of May will provide opportunities for Enron to continue
intensifying our legislative efforts.  To date, the strategy we at Enron laid
out months ago is playing out with the two tracks of consensus and
reliability crisis both receiving traction.  We just need the dominoes we
successfully laid out the strategy for months ago to continue falling.

Please feel free to call me should you need additional information or have
any questions.


I participated last weekend in the Leadership Forum for Fall 2001 of the Center for Houston's Future.  I wanted to thank you for recommending me as a member of the Forum.  I thoroughly enjoyed the opportunity to meet so many interesting, talented members of the Houston community.  I know that I will enjoy working with the group during our second session, November 1-3, as well as collaborating on some "homework" assignments that we will complete between now and then.   I especially am excited about the possibilities of making an impact on Houston's future through developing both relationships and action steps  through my association with the Center.   Thanks again for making this opportunity available to me.  --Sally Beck


This is a very good, easily digestible summary of the FERC order.  Alan
Zaremberg, CEO of the Chamber and located in Sacramento, asked if we had a
summary that we could provide him.  Zaremberg is convinced that no one in
California understands what FERC did and wanted to try to educate them.  If
we sanitize it to remove anything sensitive, are folks comfortable providing
it to Zaremberg?  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 01:45 PM -----

	Tom Briggs
	05/09/2001 03:30 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: FERC summary


Jim / Evan -

As you are probably aware, the performance and surety bond market is difficult for us to navigate in and around in our current situation.  As an example, EFS has been shut out of getting access to new bid and performance / payments bonds for its business that requires these.  We are addressing this with the bonding companies now.  All of their existing bonds are in place and in force.

In light of this, I wanted to make sure that we are absolutely current in all aspects of all bonding requirements with UDC's and LDC's.

Please send me the most current copy of your matrix that illustrates where we have existing bonds in place, what drives the capacity requirements, status, renewal / expiration date, current payment status, etc.  I would like to make sure that we are all clear on how these work, what triggers increases / decreases in capacity, and other issues impacting our ability to continue to flow electricity and natural gas to our clients.

Thanks - Dan


Attached are draft of more of the exhibits for discussion purposes.

See you tomorrow,

Kay


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 6, 2001 5:00pm through April 9, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:  No Scheduled Outages.

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:       SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MESSAGING:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:    SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: CALGARY
                            SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES: Australia
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sun 8-April-2001  at  10:00:00 AM Sydney thru Sun 8-April-2001  at
3:00:00 PM Sydney
 Sun 8-April-2001  at  1:00:00 AM GMT (London) thru Sun 8-April-2001  at
6:00:00 AM GMT (London)
 Sat 4/7/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT (Houston) thru Sun 4/8/2001 at  12:00:00 AM
CT (Houston)
 Sat 4/7/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT  thru Sat 4/7/2001 at  10:00:00 PM PT
Outage:  Sydney UPS Installation
Environments Impacted:  Corp Sydney
Purpose: Additional UPS capacity to be added to server racks. Will require
servers to be powered down & remounted
Backout:
- Replace Servers to original position
- Plug servers back to existing power.
Contact(s):  Elliott Katz +61-408-277-123
  Colin Wood    +61-416-248-353

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


Do you still have the forms for the 4 hourly people (Tyler, John, Mike, Murray). I tried to go into the PEP and get them but it is closed.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doucet, Dawn
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:53 AM
To:	Dawes, Cheryl; Devries, Paul; Dietrich, Dan; Reeves, Kathy; Zufferli, John
Cc:	Milnthorp, Rob
Subject:	Performance Reviews

My understanding (from HR in Houston) is that Lavo has asked for a list of outstanding reviews.  There's still a chance to slip under the radar if you get your outstanding reviews to me by tomorrow!

Thanks.....


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"George, Mike (CA - Calgary)" <migeorge@deloitte.ca>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, January 11, 2002 8:09 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris; Dorland, Dan
Subject:	FW: Practical Way to get the wife of your dreams!!!!!!!!!

Maybe this is an option in a few years....
-----Original Message-----
From: Rozon, Corinne [mailto:Corinne.Rozon@WatsonWyatt.com ]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:41 AM
To: Pinder, Shelly; Rozon, Ian; Wilson, Todd; Penner, Jeff; Ius, Marc;
Amanda Kinch (E-mail); Candy Short (E-mail); Chris Heller (E-mail);
Christina Lencucha (E-mail); Ciara McNiff (E-mail); Gillian Stoyko
(E-mail); Leslie Kennedy (E-mail); Mark Sawyer (E-mail); Martin Schuster
(E-mail); Michelle Blahey (E-mail); Michelle Slade (E-mail); George,
Mike (CA - Calgary); Patrick Lefebvre (E-mail); Sherry Unrau (E-mail);
Stephanie Kreuz (E-mail); Steve Hardy (E-mail); Henry, Patrick
(Montreal); Cantin, Daniel (Montreal); Hudon, Philippe (Montreal);
Hodouin, Guillaume (Montreal); Canuel, Marie-Josee (Montreal)
Subject: Practical Way to get the wife of your dreams!!!!!!!!!
www.coincidencedesign.com
Seriously - check out this web-site.  What a scream!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Maybe I'm
naive, but I think it's even legit.
Corinne


WHILE YOU WERE OUT

Caller:
Bob Nelson
Company:

Phone:
626-683-7644
FAX:

Telephoned, Please Call


"The Impact of Retail Rate Deregulation on Electricity Consumption in San
Diego" (April 2001)
PWP-082 by James B. Bushnell and Erin T. Mansur
Retail electricity rates in the San Diego Gas & Electric service territory
more than doubled over a period of three months during the summer of 2000.
Much of this increase was subsequently rescinded through a retroactive rate
freeze. We examine the impact of these events on overall consumption levels
in San Diego. We find that average electricity consumption decreased by
roughly 55 MW, or 1.6%, between mid-July and the end of August. Demand was
reduced by over 6% in the late afternoon and late evening. Because of the
uncertainty about the duration and the credibility of the rate increase,
these results should be viewed as a lower bound on the demand reductions that
could be achieved through pricing incentives.

Download this paper in Adobe Acrobat format:
http://www.ucei.org/PDF/pwp082.pdf


Ditto

	  From:  Christi L Nicolay                           04/11/2001 09:08 AM

To:	Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	FERC order denying SPP/Entergy RTO -Summary

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 09:08 AM ---------------------------

	  From:  Christi L Nicolay                           03/29/2001 07:28 PM

To:	Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:	FERC order denying SPP/Entergy RTO -Summary

FERC Order Issued 3/28/01 Rejecting SPP/Entergy's RTO

	The Commissioners were generally displeased by SPP and Entergy's lack of substantive work toward complying with the Commission's previous orders and failure to sufficiently discuss the feasibility of a broader RTO.  As Chair Herbert said:  SPP should have read the Commission's order in May and taken it more seriously.  (Issues for possible rehearing are ****).

?	The Commission declined to approve SPP's scope and configuration because the SPP members remain uncommitted to the RTO and have not made a decision to transfer operational control and the SPP/Entergy relationship remains somewhat undefined.  The Commission wants to see evidence of serious efforts to form RTOs that combine current RTO proposals and Entergy and SPP must file a report by May 25 addressing this scope issue.

	o	Bulk power sales and purchase figures indicate that natural markets extend beyond the SPP RTO borders.  There are significant sales and purchases between SPP and SERC (and Midwest companies to a lesser extent.)
	o	Expect the existing TOs to file Section 203 applications to transfer control of transmission to SPP.
	o	MOU must be clarified to demonstrate that the minimum requirements of an RTO, such as operational authority, ATC calculation and planning/expansion, will be met.

?	Approves Entergy's proposal for a Managing Member that controls all voting rights to the Transco and approves Entergy's Board approval process (states that Entergy would control no more than two of the selection committee's seven members).

?	Allows Southwestern Public Service Company to satisfy its merger obligation by joining SPP instead of MISO.

?	The Commission did not address EPMI's motion to condition market based rate authority on RTO participation.******


When you put a person feet first in a pail of cement to throw him off a
bridge, how expensive is that type of cement?

	From:  George McClellan                           11/07/2000 05:02 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cement

Second deal done - only 100,000 tons - not too worry.


As with everything else right now, I take no offense.  It was a pleasure meeting with you.  I wish you all of the best.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Day, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:47 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Thank You

Jim-

I want to thank you for taking some time to speak with me this morning about my current position relative to Enron's market position.  More importantly, I want to thank you for your candor and honesty.  I walked away from the meeting feeling elated and confident, regardless of the bleak message.

I only wish you the best of luck these next few weeks.  You are in a tough position, a position I do not envy.  I am heeding your advice and looking for opportunities outside this organization.  I had hoped to work in your group as an associate rotation.  I am certain that I could have learned a great deal from you and parlayed it into opportunities for this organization.  Maybe our paths will cross in the future.

If there is anything I can do for you, please do not hesitate to contact me.  My cell phone number is 713.444.8282 and work extension is 51793.

Yours Sincerely,

Amanda Day

PS.  Please forgive me for calling you "Jeff" earlier.  I did not realize my grave mistake until I hit the elevators.  At least you, hopefully, got a chuckle out of it.


Jim/Mark, attached is a memo that reflects my conversations with Jim Christie, Chairman of Blakes, regarding the ongoing management of Enron work, which I believe reflects our own internal discussions.  I am copying the lawyers in my group for their information.  Best regards, Peter.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"JIM CHRISTIE" <jim.christie@blakes.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22JIM+20CHRISTIE+22+20+3Cjim+2Echristie+40blakes+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Keohane, Peter
Subject:	Peter Keohane re Enron Blakes relationship

Dear Peter:

Thank you for your note.  I enclose a clean copy of my memo as requested.

When I am next in Calgary, I would like to get together with you and, if he is available, Rob Milnthorp.  In the meantime, if there is anything I can assist with, please give me a call.

Best regards,

James R. Christie
Chairman
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Commerce Court West
Box 25, 28th Floor
Toronto, Ontario  M5L 1A9

Tel:  416-863-2546
Fax:  416-863-2653
Email:  jim.christie@blakes.com

This e-mail communication is confidential and legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone number shown above or by return e-mail and delete this communication and any copy immediately.  Thank you.

 - PeterKeo.DOC
 - JIM CHRISTIE.vcf


| notifications                                                            |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Bears added to Texas Terminators's rosters, and Chiefs dropped.
If you have a cell phone or pager, you can get this information even sooner! Go to your league's web site and click "Options, Notifications" on the main toolbar to have notifications sent to your pager or phone, via text messaging.

Win a VIP Vegas Vacation! OR Win $600 CASH!
http://www.sportsline.com/links/6/1/223/sffn1011v.cgi
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|        Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc.       |
|   Your site is always at http://football.fantasy.sportsline.com/getbad   |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+

FB10SP


Here are the EES contracts that we have designated as Tier One priorities.  I
am attempting to identify the internal deal contacts (Service Mgrs, Legal,
Models, etc.) for each of these transactions.

American National Can
ArchDiocese of Chicago
Chase
Eli Lilly
IBM
Owens
Packaged Ice
Pilkington
Polaroid
Quebecor
Rite Aid
Simon Properties
Springs Industries
Suiza Foods
Tyco
UC/CSU

Thanks for your help on this stuff.  If you haven't received a response
before you leave let me know if I can assist in the follow-up.

Terry
x30442


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
09:36 AM ---------------------------

Li Sun@ENRON
11/22/2000 08:40 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Happy Thanksgiving!

Hello, Vince!

Happy Thanksgiving!

Per our talk, here is a master list of Total Return Swap deals. I am giving
it a shot to compile everything in a spreadsheet ("Trigger Event"), please be
advised whether it is helpful.

Thanks!

Li


not this weekend but the following weekend.  you missed a great st. patty's
day.  i have a date with some hot kappa from ut on fri.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	CustomerNotices, WGPHOU [mailto:WGPHOU.CustomerNotices@Williams.com]
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 10:20 AM
Subject:	Second Notice Transit on the Web Up Grade

February 1, 2002

To:  All Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Customers, Shippers,
Producer-Suppliers and Other Interested Parties

SECOND NOTICE:  Please review the following notice that was
posted on January 9, 2002.

Transit on the Web is upgrading its mainframe operating system.
Customers, who have not done so already, will need to upgrade
their version of QWS3270 from 16-bit to 32-bit.  QWS3270 is the
tool used for Confirmation Ranking, ONE Contracting and Capacity
Release.

We are asking that all of our Transit customers upgrade to
the 32-bit version by February 7, 2002.  The Transit Home Page
contains a link with directions to determine your version (16-bit
or 32-bit). It also contains necessary information to upgrade if
needed.

If the upgrade is not completed by February 7, 2002, customers may
not be able to access Confirmation Ranking, ONE Contracting and
Capacity Release.

If you have any questions or if you are a customer using Windows
NT, please call the Transit Help line.

Margaret E. Kleiner
Manager
Transportation Scheduling