FYI.

Kal

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-djcustomclips+40djinteractive+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 6:18 AM
To:	156283@mailman.enron.com
Subject:	Enron: E-Trading 'Veteran' EnronOnline Calmly Faces NewcomersEntering Market    and United ...

E-Trading 'Veteran' EnronOnline Calmly Faces NewcomersEntering Market
and United ICE-IPE.

06/07/2001
The Oil Daily
(c) 2001 Energy Intelligence Group. All rights reserved.

In the world of energy e-trade, Enron is one of the veteran players, having
launched its EnronOnline commodity trading platform in November 1999 - and
having completed its one-millionth transaction on the trading system late last
month.

Trading activity on EnronOnline is driven in large part by the Houston-based
company's strength in the North American natural gas and power markets. But
Enron wants the market to know the company is much more than a gas, power, and
now bandwidth trader.
Last week, Enron added crude oil and refined product options to EnronOnline,
to go alongside the existing 52 products the company currently lists in the US
oil market. Larry Gagliardi, director of US crude and products trading for
Enron, says that new contracts are constantly being considered, based mostly
on recommendations from users of its trading platform.

In the US, Enron lists several types of primarily financial crude contracts on
EnronOnline. These include swaps that replicate New York Mercantile Exchange
futures contracts, jet differential swaps, and gasoline crack spreads. Enron
also has a physical West Texas Intermediate contract that is traded
around-the-clock.

The company posts a bid price and offer price for all of those contracts,
which means 104 US crude and product contracts are available on EnronOnline.
In US markets, about 5 million-6 million barrels of firm oil quotes are posted
daily on EnronOnline. The company electronically lists oil contracts through
2002, but the system can accommodate longer-term deals.

Outside the US, Gagliardi says that EnronOnline has been most successful in
European crude markets. "Asia has been a little harder, technologically," he
says, noting that computer technology and internet connections are less
reliable there.

Enron's offerings in Europe include a swap for the differential between dated
Brent quotes and the front-month Brent futures contract on London's
International Petroleum Exchange (IPE), and swaps that mimic the IPE's Brent
and gas oil futures contracts. A range of contracts are offered in Asia,
including straightforward swaps for the Dubai and Tapis crude benchmarks, as
well as for regional gas oil, high-sulfur fuel oil, and kerosene.

When EnronOnline first launched, Gagliardi says, many brokers thought Enron
was committing suicide by posting hundreds of commodity prices online. But the
gamble has paid off. Enron's North American gas and power trading volumes, for
example, have exploded to nearly twice the size of volumes handled by its
nearest competitor, thanks to EnronOnline. Last year, Enron traders used the
trading platform to complete more than 3,000 trades per person, up from 672
per trader in 1999.

In recent months, Enron's trading activities have been overshadowed by other
developments - most notably the oil company-backed IntercontinentalExchange's
planned acquisition of the IPE.

Intercontinental, or ICE, is also making a push in Asian oil markets, having
just opened an office in Singapore. Far East derivatives offered on ICE
include Singapore gas oil, fuel oil, kerosene, and naphtha oil product swaps.
ICE also offers Dubai and Tapis crude oil swaps.

Despite being faced with new competition, Enron's Gagliardi says the company's
strategy hasn't changed. He bets that the liquidity and prices on EnronOnline
will go unmatched by others.

Enron's online trading system is different from most of its rivals. ICE, gas
and power exchange TradeSpark, and others bring together buyers and sellers to
trade anonymously online. On EnronOnline, Enron is a counterparty to every
deal done on its site.

Some traders have criticized Enron's trading platform, saying they prefer
doing deals on exchanges with hundreds of participants - not on an online
platform that they say is a sales channel for Enron.

Gagliardi admits that the exchange model sounds appealing, but says that, so
far, those exchanges have been unable to offer the same trading opportunities
available on EnronOnline.

"The reality of the situation is that no one wants to put out a number and
leave it firm," he says of other online commodity exchanges.

Jeff Gosmano.

(c) Copyright 2001. The Oil Daily Co.

For more infomation, call 800-999-2718 (in U.S.) or

202-662-0700 (outside U.S.).

Folder Name: Enron
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 98

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Bill:

Steve Kean would like the attached memo and attached org chart to go out
company wide.

Subject: Public Affairs Organizational Announcement

Text:

 I am pleased to announce the following changes in the government and
regulatory affairs organization:

Rick Shapiro ) Managing Director of Government Affairs for the Americas.
Rick is currently leading the government and regulatory affairs teams for the
US and Canada.  He will now assume responsibility for North and South
America.  Ricardo Charvel (Senior Director of Government Affairs for
Mexico),  Jose Bestard (Vice President of Government Affairs for South
America), and Joe Hillings (Vice President of Federal Government Affairs)
will now report to Rick.  Rick and his team will support Enron,s North
American business units as well as the Caribbean and Southern Cone regions.

Mark Schroeder ) Vice President Government Affairs for Europe, Asia and
Africa.  Mark is currently leading the government and regulatory affairs
teams for Enron Europe.  He will now assume the additional responsibility of
supporting the APACHI and India organizations.  Jane Wilson will now focus
her attention on Enron India and will report to Mark as will our government
and regulatory affairs teams serving the APACHI region.

Mike Terraso ) Vice President  Environment, Health & Safety and Chief
Environmental Officer.  Mike is currently serving as Vice President of
Environment, Health and Safety for the gas pipeline group.  Mike has
increasingly become involved in environmental issues facing Enron,s
businesses around the world. Mike will retain his current responsibilities
and will assume leadership of the environmental affairs team.

John Hardy ) Vice President Global Project Finance.  John will report
directly to me and will continue his current responsibilities representing
Enron before US and multilateral project finance agencies.

Please join in me in congratulating these individuals on their
responsibilities.

Attached is a revised organization chart reflecting these changes.


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001
10:26 AM ---------------------------

Margaret Carson
04/10/2001 10:04 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: HERE ARE MY SLIDES, I ASKED TIM TO SEND A SET OF HIS BY E MAIL TOO

Steve  Here  are my slides  and  a copy of  the  text  regards  Margaret


From Jenny Rub and Shelley Corman:

Attached is an updated version of the "Project Why" task force document
incorporating suggestions we have received from Julia White and John
Pravetto.  We have not received any other feedback on the scope document.

Please note that the revised project document also includes a proposed work
plan.   It is important that we finalize the scope/work plan early next week,
as we have many project activities planned for March.


that is fine - tell dad that this is our treat

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 01/10/2001 06:39:57 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric.Bass@enron.com
cc: "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
Subject: Re: Re:

Hi Eric,

We have reservations for 6:30 Sat.  Is that o.k.?  It's a very small
restaurant and that's the best I could do.  We look forward to seeing you
and Shanna.  Jason declined.  LU-M
----- Original Message -----
From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
To: <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
Cc: <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Re:

>
> we will look fwd to it
>
>
>
>
> "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 01/09/2001 09:53:39 AM
>
> To:   Eric.Bass@enron.com
> cc:   KATHY BASS <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> Subject:  Re: Re:
>
>
>
>
> Good morning. How about Sat. night, @ Cafe Natalie. Wonderful food, cheap.
> Atmosphere is ??? We like it. It is near our home. Say 6-6:30? Mother
needs
> to make reservations. Let us know ASAP.-L
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> To: <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 8:09 AM
> Subject: Re:
>
>
> >
> > Hey Dad,
> > We would love to meet ya'll for dinner.  Just let me know when. The only
> > night we can't is Friday.
> >
> > Love,
> > e
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com> on 01/07/2001 08:18:22 PM
> >
> > To:   eric preston bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> > cc:
> > Subject:
> >
> >
> >
> > Good evening Son. Seems like forever since we have  talked. Hope your
> week
> > was good and next week is better. Lets get together for  lunch or dinner
> > next week. Stay in touch. Love  you-Dad
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>


Yes, please change to be confirmed.  The only thing you might need to do is
tell the schedulers because you might get a message that warns that you will
unroute this deal.  They just need to know about it.  Let me know.

Thanks!

   Kate Symes                01/03/2001 11:52 AM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: #484043

This was Stan Cocke's deal, and since he just transferred into mid-marketing
from real time, he's not used to putting the confimation request into his
deals. This should be confirmed; but since the deal has already flowed, I
wanted to check with you before changing anything. Please let me know.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           12/22/2000 08:44 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #484043

This deal is coded not to be confirmed, but it flows longer than 6 days which
is the criteria for creating confirmations.  Can you check with the trader,
and if it should be confirmed, get a contact and let me know.

Thanks!


Hi there,

Could you send me three brochures?  I'm working on getting a couple of
friends together for a 2-3 night retreat to LAS.  Please send the info to Kay
Mann, 29 Inverness Park Way, Houston, Texas, 77055.

Thanks,

Kay


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 08:53
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
05/15/2000 08:53 AM
To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CES Storage

Robert, would you put these deals on the morning sheet please.  Thanks.  We
will not be using the CPR storage deal ticket any more.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000 08:52
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
05/15/2000 08:51 AM
To: Molly Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff W Westover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Feldman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal
Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT (bcc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT)
Subject: CES Storage

Molly set up the following tickets to capture our CGAS storage transactions.
This is how it will work,

Deal #  Comment
268093  CES Exchange Buy - use when storage injections are less than the
proxy volume
268090  CES Exchange Sell - use when storage injections are greater than the
proxy volume
268094  CES Sell - this is the proxy storage injection ticket.  The volume
should not change.

The daily proxy volume for the month of May is 35,133.  When we inject
35,133, the transport we use to fill storage will be the supply for deal
268094.  When we overinject like we did for the 1st - 4th, 35,133 of the
transport will be matched with deal 268094 and the balance of the transport
will be matched against deal 268090.  When we underinject, we will use deal
268093 as the supply for deal 268094.

This may seem a little confusing.  Please call me if you still have questions.

Thanks


Thanks, Joe

To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:

As you know, the ENA gas floor came in with a $30 million VAR position
today.  Even though this left us with another $10 million of unused VAR, I
want to make you aware that we may exceed our VAR limit today. This move up
was much bigger than the market anticipated, and natural gas volatility was
up quite a bit. The VAR calculation is now kicked off at 2:00am and we will
know our VAR position by 6:00am.  If we are over, I will need to ask for a
one day increase.  I have already told the desk heads that we will most
likely need to sell some contracts tonight and tomorrow.

Jeff


At least the media sympathy is turning.  Take a look at how they treat some encouraging poll results.

Mark
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shortridge, Pat
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:	Gray Davis' latest

---------------------- Forwarded by Pat Shortridge/Corp/Enron on 07/19/2001 11:48 AM ---------------------------

Pat Shortridge
07/19/2001 11:42 AM
To:	John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, mark s palmer/enron@enronXgate@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	Gray Davis' latest

CA, under Gray Davis leadership, has been buying power at roughly $135 per megawatt hour.  Because CA has no real experience in the business of buying and selling power, they've bought far too much and been forced to dump their power glut back on the market for as little as $1-15.

Gov. Davis reaction, "Who cares.  That's just minutiae."

http://www0.mercurycenter.com/local/center/pol071901.htm

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


Peter,

Enron South America has nothing to do with COA.  Enron North America is the
assignee.

As for payments, we can state that as of the signing of the agreements, all
payments have been made.  Sounds ok to me.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/20/2000 11:09:56 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: <eric.boyt@enron.com>

Subject: RE: Information Needed for City of Austin

Is Enron South America the assignee for the City of Austin deal?  If so,
I need its place of incorporation and location of its ofices.  As to the
exhibits, I believe most can be copied.  However, at least Exhibit N-3
is deal specific and will list the purchase amount for aech unit for the
calculation of the unit liability amount.  If the November payment has
been made, then the turbines for the City of Austin have been completely
paid for. Should I just put Not Used for Section 6.1.2?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 11:53 AM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Kay Mann (E-mail); Pipitone, Paul; Cobb, Chris
Subject: Re: Information Needed for City of Austin

Hi Peter,

1. I don't think you need to do anything re Enron South America, as Rob
Taylor is working on that.  Were you asking about ENA? Delaware, 1400
Smith, Houston, 77002.
 2.  I don't know who is preparing all the exhibits, as I'm waiting to
hear
from GE.  Don't most of the exhibits just need to be copied?  Is the
list
you gave me of the exhibits which need to be adapted the right place to
look?
3. No.  The November payment has been made.

You should get the other info by email from Eric Boyt.

Thanks,

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/20/2000 10:33:27 AM

To:   "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:   "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
      <chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject:  Information Needed for City of Austin

I need the following information to complete the City of Austin Facility
Agreement:

1.         Where is Enron South America incorporated and where are its
offices located?

2.         For the recitals, what is the kW capacity of its plant and
where
is the plant located?

3.         Please confirm that ENA is preparing all exhibits, including
Exhibit N-3 (which is the original price for each unit).

4.         According to the spreadsheet, the City of Austin doesn't make
any payments after November.  I put the amount due in November under the
January 15, 2001 payment date.   Is that correct?

5.         According to the spreadsheet, the Guaranteed Delivery Dates
for
Units 9-11 was 10/30/00.  The Guaranteed Delivery Date for Unit 12 is
11/30/00.  Are these still the dates we are using?

6.         Please provide the serial numbers for Units 9-12 for Section
10.2.1.

7.         Please provide the names, addresses, etc. for Sections 25.1
and
25.3


Should I cancel my trip?  I don't mind at all.

Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Saturday, December 15, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Schoppe, Tammie
Subject:	CANCELflights for next week - I'm staying here

Louise Kitchen
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Americas
Tel:  713 853 3488
Fax: 713 646 2308


Laura,
I would like 2 Champions pavillion tickets for all 4 days.  I am not sure who
I will take as of yet.
thanks,
mike


Johnny - when you speak to Mr. Zaman, see what he thinks about timing and if
Luralene is close to the blessed event how we should go forward.
---------------------- Forwarded by Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron on 07/25/2000
01:40 PM ---------------------------

"Lawrence A. Ruzow" <laruzow@concentric.net> on 07/24/2000 06:02:20 PM
Please respond to laruzow@concentric.net
To: Louis.Soldano@enron.com, lsoldano@wt.net, "Lawrence Ruzow'"
<laruzow@concentric.net>
cc:

Subject: Re: NAVAJO--ROW

LAWYER--CLIENT COMMUNICATION

Louie:

    I spoke with Luralene, she is ready to deliver her baby ("any day
now"), so it is possible that it may be hard to get a meeting with her. (I
did not talk to her about TW.)


Candidly, Mark wanted to leave it open as to whom it would report.  He wanted
to have control in it's growth and staffing, although it would be coordinated
with Thor.  Mark (and I) talked to Thor about this a while ago, and will
begin weekly video calls in the new year about strategy, updates, new
products, and growing this business continentally.  (Mark was still concerned
about the members of the Oslo weather group that Thor managed poorly--in
Mark's mind).  I'm sure we will get to a point that works best
organizationally with Thor having a role.  However, when you look at the P&L
of the business, is doesn't illustrate his support of the business, which we
are addressing.

Hope this helps, and you are relaxing a little....

Jeff

Mike McConnell
12/19/2000 10:07 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Organizational Announcement - revised comments

Jeff,
Below is an email from John.  Please let me know how to respond.  I know you
guys talked about this.  Thor was in the loop here wasn't he?  I know we took
out the Thor reporting piece but in reality they do report up through him.
How many people do we expect in London?  John and I did talk about this and I
didn't really think of it lately.

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
09:59 AM ---------------------------

John Sherriff
12/19/2000 01:29 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Organizational Announcement - revised comments

After re-reading your note - I see that it is not a trading desk in London
but a marketing desk
- but it is still unclear to me how this fits into the Oslo desk.  Also
shouldn't we be talking about this or your
guys talking to Thor who is running the European Weather business?

John

---------------------- Forwarded by John Sherriff/LON/ECT on 19/12/2000 07:31
---------------------------

John Sherriff
19/12/2000 06:25
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Organizational Announcement

I thought we had specifically agreed that we were not adding a market making
function in London!  If you
have got traders to spare I can use about six of them.

John
---------------------- Forwarded by John Sherriff/LON/ECT on 19/12/2000 06:28
---------------------------
   Enron Global Markets LLC - Office of the Chairman

From: Enron Global Markets LLC - Office of the Chairman@ENRON on 18/12/2000
21:21 CST
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Enron Wholesale Services
cc:
Subject: Organizational Announcement

Enron Global Markets (EGM) has made numerous organizational changes as its
businesses continue to grow and expand around the world.  We are pleased to
announce the following changes within EGM.

Financial Trading
The Convertible Arbitrage desk has moved from EnronCredit.com to the
Financial Trading group under Gary Hickerson.  Mike Bradley will manage the
desk.

Billy Lemmons has joined Gary Hickerson's group from EIM.  He is exploring
the agriculture value chain and origination opportunities.

Transportation and Shipping
Dan Reck will be transitioning out of the coal group and will be exploring
our rail and trucking initiatives.  These markets together represent
approximately $105 billion notionally, and we believe there are many
synergies between our energy, coal, and freight trading businesses.

Enron is currently trading dry-freight through EOL and is a leading market
maker in this new product. The shipping business is growing very quickly.  We
have asked Pierre Aury and Scott Montcrief to co-lead our worldwide vessel
trading businesses.  Scott will be responsible for all liquids vessel
businesses and Pierre will manage all dry vessel businesses.  The LNG vessel
business currently managed by Wayne Perry will remain in the LNG group, but
will also report to and coordinate with Pierre and Scott.

Weather
Our worldwide weather operations will continue to report to Mark Tawney in
Houston.  This business, which includes trading weather products in 10
countries and 40 states in the U.S., is also rapidly expanding.  Mark will
have all V@R allocation responsibility between Sydney, Tokyo, Oslo, and
Houston.  In addition we will be forming a weather-marketing desk in London.

Crude and Products
Bill White will be coming over from EBS and will have responsibility for all
U.S. financial crude trading.  Don Schroeder will continue to have oversight
and lead our physical crude business.  Mario De La Ossa has joined EGM from
Equiva and will manage our product options book.

Doug Leach will be expanding his fuel management and origination role.  He
will report directly to John Nowlan.

Finance and Structuring
Andrew Makk has joined the finance team from the Middle East group.  Most
recently he has been working on the Gaza project.

Jim Lewis has also joined this team. His last assignment was leading the
structuring group for CALME.

Both Andrew and Jim will report to Larry Lawyer.

Corporate Development
Mark Wadlington has joined the EGM team and will be managing this activity
and co-ordinating with all Enron Corp. He reports to Tim Detmering with
accountability to the office of the chairman of EGM.

Operations and Accounting
Todd Hall has expanded his role as Business Controller and will have
responsibility for coal and weather.

Mike Perun has joined Enron from the banking industry and is responsible for
Controls & Standards.  He will focus on EGM,s operational and accounting
processes on a global basis.  He reports to Brent Price.

The Ecoelectrica power plant in Puerto Rico will move reporting
responsibility into the Enron Global Assets group.  Greg Curran, who is
responsible for all the activities in Puerto Rico, will report to that group
on all Ecoelectrica business and to Enron Global Markets on the remaining
businesses.

Please join us in congratulating everyone in their new roles.


Jennifer,

Can I get a contact from you for a representative at Hewlett-Packard.  I am
needing to get in a 15" and an 18" LCD monitor to compare to other brands for
the trading floors in the new building.

Thank you.

Regards,
Darin Lee Carlisle
Supply Analyst - Global Strategic Sourcing
Enron
713-345-6133 - Office
713-646-6313


Dear Mark:

Thank you for your email.

We will be located at Pier 66, dock C-64.

If you would like I can send you boat show tickets for Saturday and Sunday to your office
address that you have listed. Or if you prefer we can send them elsewhere.   Please let us
know.

Best Regards,
Vela for Joel F. Potter
Cruising Yacht Specialist
Amel's Sole Associate for the Americas

-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) [mailto:Mark.Taylor@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:46 PM
To: jfpottercys@worldnet.att.net
Subject: RE: Ft. Lauderdale Boat Show

Joel:

Thanks for your note back.  Unfortunately I don't get into town until
quite late on Friday evening so Saturday and Sunday are the only days I
can make it.  Do you know yet where you'll be located?

Mark

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Joel F. Potter" <jfpottercys@worldnet.att.net>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Joel+20F+2E+20Potter+22+20+3Cjfpottercys+40world
> net+2Eatt+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 4:44 PM
> To:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
> Subject:	RE: Ft. Lauderdale Boat Show
>
> Dear Mark:
>
> No appointment is needed but Trade Day (Thursday) is usually
> best/least busy day to come
> aboard.  Shall I send you some tickets for that day?  If you would
> like them please send
> me your mailing address.
>
> Best Regards,
> Joel F. Potter
> Cruising Yacht Specialist
> Amel's Sole Associate for the Americas
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Taylor, Mark E (Legal) [mailto:Mark.Taylor@ENRON.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 3:55 PM
> To: jfpottercys@att.net
> Cc: TedBockius@spherion.com
> Subject: Ft. Lauderdale Boat Show
>
>
> I understand that you will have an Amel at the Ft. Lauderdale boat
> show
> next month.  Do I need an appointment to see the boat?
>
> Mark Taylor
> Vice President and General Counsel
> Enron Wholesale Services
> 1400 Smith Street - EB3892
> Houston, Texas 77008
> (713)853-7459
> (713)646-3490 (fax)
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and may contain
> confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
> recipient (s). Any
> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient),
> please contact the
> sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
> enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
> copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> not intended to be an
> offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
> enforceable contract
> between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
> recipient or any other
> party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract
> by estoppel or
> otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>


Does GRI go from $.0072 to $.0070 in January?

And I love that outfit you are wearing.


- 1-30-2002.xls


********************[ A D V E R T I S E M E N T ]****************
Turn your Nasdaq trash into cash! Dive into the Nasdaq dumpster
and capture 50-100% profits in just a few days. Don't get
left behind! Click here for your FREE special report:
"The Next 5 Monster Stocks of the NewTech Era"
http://www.changewave.com/a/11/sos27
*****************************************************************
SIVY ON STOCKS from money.com
December 1, 2000

Updating the Sivy 100

Out goes Allstate, AMR, Bank One and Honeywell. The new members are
Comcast, EDS, MBNA and Motorola.

By Michael Sivy

I like to update the Sivy 100 [ www.money.com/money/sivy100/ ] at regular
intervals, and given the market turmoil of recent months, some changes are
surely in order. That said, readers shouldn't rush to buy new additions,
nor should they necessarily sell the stocks I'm replacing. The Sivy 100 is
intended to be a source for top-quality growth stocks that belong in a
well-balanced stock portfolio. But the decision to buy or sell should also
reflect price levels and the near-term market outlook.

Far and away the most important recent development for the overall market
is that analysts have become increasingly worried about the potential for a
serious economic slowdown next
year -- conceivably even a recession. As a result, earnings growth
projections have come down across the board and otherwise solid companies
in slower-growing industries have slipped below my 12 percent cutoff for
projected total return.

In a sense, the downward revisions by analysts are meaningless. The folks
in Bally tasseled loafers didn't cut their numbers until after many
companies had already warned that future earnings would fall short. So why
didn't they tell us that six months ago? Moreover, the long-term earnings
growth potential for some stocks has arguably gone up slightly, since
future profits will be compared with weak numbers for the current year.

As a result, I haven't kicked stocks off the list simply because analysts
have temporarily cut their projections to a little below 12 percent. The
ones I've replaced no longer have the long-term growth prospects I look for.

Allstate [ALL], for example, is cutting costs and broadening its business
in positive ways. But its growth prospects have fallen far below my cutoff,
largely because of weakness in insurance pricing and losses due to
unusually bad weather. (Though its growth prospects are sub-par, many
analysts still like Allstate as a value play with a price-to-earnings ratio
of14.)

AMR [AMR], the parent of American Airlines, faces an uncertain future. The
March spin-off of its SABRE reservation system muddies year-over-year
comparisons. High jet-fuel prices and the possibility of a
recession-induced drop in business traffic further cloud prospects.

Bank One [ONE] is suffering in a more difficult banking environment and
needs to complete a complicated restructuring and cost-reduction plan. As a
result, the company's growth prospects don't look as attractive as those of
some competitors.

Finally, Honeywell International [HON] will almost certainly be taken over
by General Electric within the next few months, so it will disappear from
our list in any event before too long.

I try to make sure that the Sivy 100 includes as diversified an assortment
of industries as possible. But obviously, some industries have better
long-term growth prospects than others. So as projections become less
generous overall, there's a natural shift away from old-line businesses to
higher-growth stocks.

Since I've written a lot about Comcast [CMCSK] and Motorola [MOT], they're
natural additions to the list. Among other stocks that passed our latest
screens, Electronic Data Systems [EDS] is the most attractive, with
projected growth of 15 percent a year and 21 P/E. And MBNA [KRB], a major
credit-card issuer, looks like a sound choice to replace Bank One.

================
UPCOMING CHAT:
Monday, December 4 at 8pm ET, 5pm PT
Michael Sivy identifies sectors and stocks that possess true value
in a rocky market. http://www.money.com/chat/
AOL users go to Keyword: Live
================

###

Post your comments on Michael's column at:
http://www.money.com/depts/investing/sivy/index.html

To subscribe or unsubscribe to Sivy on Stocks, go to:
http://www.money.com/email/

Earning Releases and Calls
For the latest corporate earnings releases and online conference
calls click on: http://money.ccbn.com

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Special Internet Offer!!!

Sign up for a RISK-FREE issue of MONEY MAGAZINE at
http://www.money.com/subscribe2

Or if you prefer call our toll-free number 1-800-544-4594

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

We may, from time to time, contact you with offers for Time Inc.
products and services which we think may be of interest to you.
If you would prefer us not to contact you in this manner, AND
YOU DID NOT INDICATE THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP
for the Sivy on Stocks online newsletter or any other Time Inc.
online newsletters, please let us know by sending us an e-mail
at <no_solicit@money.com>.

Additionally, from time to time we may provide your e-mail
address to carefully chosen companies whose offers we think may
be of interest to you.  If you would prefer us not use your
e-mail address in this manner, AND YOU DID NOT INDICATE
THIS PREFERENCE AT THE TIME YOU SIGNED UP for the Sivy on Stocks online
newsletter or any other Time Inc. online newsletter, please let
us know by e-mailing us at <no_transfer@money.com>.


Bill,

Can we delete the Chicago books from Global Counterparties.  We will not be using these books at all.  Let me know if this would be possible.  The GCP id's are 166896, 167105, and 166898.  Thanks.

John


Suzanne:
Thanks.  I'll call or write back later as my free time is up!  Everything is
going well.  I hope to be up for a visit maybe sometime next week.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Suzanne Adams
	08/09/00 11:06 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Office Build-out

I've already asked Joya to give me a firm date when she knew something
because I was going on vacation.  Don't worry about it, I'll take care of
everything.  I have to fine out where to send your things first.  I wonder
when they'll be moving me?  Got any idea?  No one has said a word to me about
it at all.  It'll get done, don't worry about a thing.

How's everything going?

	Carol St Clair
	08/09/2000 10:57 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Office Build-out

Suzanne:
FYI.  Can you and the clerks handle packing up my office?  I may be able to
help but I don't want to make any commitment  that I can make it up there.
Hopefully, it won't take that long and the only files that need to be marked
or perhaps put in the legal assistant area are the files near my window.  If
the move-out timing slips and happens while you are on vacation, I would
prefer that it be handled before hand so that the floater doesn't have to
worry about it.  Let me know what you think.  Sorry to impose but I tried to
do as much as I could before I left.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 08/09/00 10:52 AM -----

	Mark Taylor
	08/08/00 09:08 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Office Build-out

It looks like Phase II of our construction project (over where Julia's office
used to be) will be finished on the 18th so she will be moving into her new
office that weekend.  I now have the plans for Phase III and it turns out
your office will be included in the construction area.  Phase III will
probably start on the 25th.  That could always slip but I wanted to give you
as much notice as possible.

Hope you are all doing well.  Getting any sleep yet?


-----Original Message-----
From: 	McBride, Jane
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:27 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Cc:	Aronowitz, Alan
Subject:	RE: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 10-3-01

Hi Tana,
Is Fujitsu Networks Communications a Japanese company or a US company?
Jane

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	04 October 2001 09:06
To:	Aronowitz, Alan; Calo, Andrea; Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS); Gaffney, Chris; Hansen, Leslie; Hodge, Jeffrey T.; Johnston, Greg; Keohane, Peter; Korkmas, Deb; McBride, Jane; Minns, David; Nettelton, Marcus; Powell, Mark; Rossi, Robbi; Van Hooser, Steve; Viverito, John
Subject:	FW: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 10-3-01

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:30 PM
To:	Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Arnold, Thu Pham; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals: 10-3-01

Please see attached.

 << File: EOL 10-03-01.xls >>

Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835


Tom,

Maybe I mis-interpreted again, but here are the graphs for site total (the
boxplots are still by turbine). This is for May. I will wait to see if this
is more like what you need before continuing with the earlier months.

Mark


At Mark's request, I am transmitting proposed changes to the collateral
arrangement language in the Online GTC's.  Please let me know if it meets
with your approval.

8.  Collateral Arrangements.  Counterparty shall (at Enron,s request) from
time to time and at Enron,s option either:  (i) within one Business Day of
such request by Enron, provide to Enron a letter of credit in respect of
Counterparty's obligations under any Transaction, in such form and for such
amount and from such issuer, as is acceptable to Enron in its absolute
discretion; or (ii) within such period as is specified by Enron, provide for
the benefit of Enron a guaranty from a party, in such form and for such
amount as is acceptable to Enron in its absolute discretion.  Failure so to
provide such letter of credit or guaranty or any default under such letter of
credit or guaranty shall constitute a default hereunder giving rise to the
immediate right of termination by Enron under this Transaction.


Mitch,

I included your home info. Thanks.

Jinsung
(37330)


My fault.  I should have sent this out this morning.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000 05:50
PM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/28/2000 08:43:05 AM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *cfrankl2@enron.com" <cfrankl2@enron.com>, " -
*joan.veselack@enron.com" <joan.veselack@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com"
<vversen@enron.com>, " - *cindy.vachuska@enron.com"
<cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " - *cora_pendergrass@enron.com"
<cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " - *mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>,
" - *scott.goodell@enron.com" <scott.goodell@enron.com>, " -
*steve.gillespie@enron.com" <steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " -
*cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " - *despey@enron.com"
<despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com" <joann.collins@enron.com>
Subject: CES Daily March Requirements for 3/28 and after

The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for
and          .    There are two worksheets:  The one labelled with today's
date
contains the volumes that we need at each of the delivery points indicated.
The schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed at
a
specific point.

The sheet labelled 'Daily Change' shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in
the requested daily volume relative to a prior value.  For the current gas
day,
the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using the previous day's
volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current gas day is 3/28, then
the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for 3/28).  For
tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the change is computed using
the First-of-the-month volumes requested for those days.  (e.g., If today is
3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect to the
first-of-the-month volumes for those days.)   This sheet should be useful in
determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that we take or turn back.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-28-00 daily vols AM.xls


What if we replace Section 2 with something like "This Agreement shall
continue in effect unless and until terminated pursuant to Section 3,"  and
replace Section 3 with "Either Party may terminate this Agreement upon
written notice to the other Party not less than twelve (12) months prior to
the intended date of termination."

Sound OK?  if so I'll add it to my draft.

David Foti
05/10/2000 06:20 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: WT-1 Electric Service Agreement

Looks like you nailed the least cost billing provision pretty good.  Just
need to abrogate our remaining term and make all agreements evergreen.

	From:  Susan Scott                           05/10/2000 05:45 PM

To: David Foti/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: WT-1 Electric Service Agreement

P.S. -- Dave, on your wish list you had included an evergreen provision.  See
Section 2 of the original contract, which gives TW the right to extend for
another five-year term by giving notice to SPS.  If TW does not give such
notice, SPS may cancel the contract, and if it doesn't, the contract
automatically rolls over for another year.  If this is not acceptable please
let me know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 05/10/2000
05:40 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           05/10/2000 05:41 PM

To: Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Foti/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: WT-1 Electric Service Agreement

Rich and Dave, attached are my suggested revisions to Mike McLeod's draft of
an amendment to the original electric service agreement.  Dave, I'll bring
you a copy of that agreement.  Rich, if Mike did not send you one, let me
know and I will fax it to you.

In my revisions, I've attempted to reflect the least cost billing you
described to me, using terminology I read in the tariff.  Please let me know
if it looks alright to you.  I'm available to discuss this whenever you are,
then I will make sending this to Mike top priority.  My sincerest apologies
for the delay; there has been more chaos around here than I am accustomed to
handling, and I appreciate your patience.

Susan
x30596


I do not prepare ISDAs however,  you can contact one of the following persons:

Stephanie Panus  713- 853-4737
Susan Bailey          713-345-3249.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Hi Sue:

Hope all is well in the land of forward contracts.  Do we know who the
speakers are?  Is Dave Parquet attending for us?

Thanks.
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 08:09 PM -----

	"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
	01/03/2001 07:52 PM
	Please respond to kaplan

		 To: "Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Cary
Rudman" <cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Chuck Cole" <ccole@advocation-inc.com>,
"Delany Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "DJ Smith"
<djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@acom2.com>, "Jamie
Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Jean
Munoz" <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>, "Jen Paulsen" <paulsen@hmot.com>, "John
Larrea" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "Julee Malinowski-Ball"
<jmball@ns.net>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Katie Kaplan"
<kaplan@iepa.com>, "marie moretti" <marie_moretti@msn.com>, "Maureen OHaren"
<Oharen@hmot.com>, "McNally Ray" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "Mike Monagan"
<mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Norton Kelli" <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "Phil
Isenberg" <isenberg@hmot.com>, "Robert Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Ron Tom"
<Rtom@govadv.com>, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Susan Mccabe"
<sfmccabe@mindspring.com>, "Tom Ross" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc: "Carol H Hudson" <Chudson@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>,
"Douglas Kerner" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>, "Andy Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "B
Brown Andy" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "Baker Carolyn"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Curtis
Kebler" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>,
"Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>,
"John Stout" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Karen Edson" <kedson@ns.net>,
"kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Kristin Vellandi"
<kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marty
Wilson" <mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "Paula Hall-Collins"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "Pigott Jack" <jackp@calpine.com>,
"Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Rob Lamkin"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Stephanie-Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>
		 Subject: Here is the Energy briefing agenda for the Republican Caucus and FAQ

Greetings:
For those of you attending the Republican Caucus briefing tomorrow it is in
room 126 and runs from 9-noon (from what we understand it will be close
quarters so arrive early if you have been invited to speak). This meeting is
open to those who have been invited only.

Attached please find the agenda. IEP will be handing out the Seeing the
Light document, Power Up, and the editorial from the Bee today.  We will be
following up with the FAQ's with a letter to each attendee on Friday.

I have also attached the Final FAQ and Glossary of Terms.  Please let us
know by 2:00 tomorrow if you have any changes or additions to these
documents.

Thanks!
Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

 - Rep Energy Briefing Agenda.doc
 - Final.FAQ.1.03.01.doc
 - Glossary of Terms.doc


Larry,

 Just a note to touch base on the sagewood townhomes and other development
opportunities.

 I stumbled across some other duplexes for sale on the same street. that were
built by Reagan Lehmann.  22 Units were sold for
 around $2 million. ($182,000/duplex).  I spoke to Reagan and he indicated
that he had more units under construction that would be
 available in the 180's.  Are the units he is selling significantly different
from yours?  He mentioned some of the units are the 1308 floor
 plan.  My bid of 2.7 million is almost $193,000/duplex.

 As far as being an investor in a new project, I am still very interested.

 Call or email with your thoughts.

Phillip


I JUST WANTED TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THAT TODAY (11-10-00) IS MY LAST DAY.  I
JUST FEEL LIKE IT IS TIME FOR SOMETHING NEW.   I HOPE YOU ALL HAVE GREAT
HOLIDAY AND GOOD LUCK IN YOUR LIVES.  DON'T FORGET ME!!!!

SINCERELY
NIKKI JOHNSON


Note:  The FERC meeting is today.  See the link below that can be checked for
updates.

Enron's Lay Urges Bold Solutions to Power Market Woes

As the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission prepared to weigh in this morning
with the federal government's answer to California's be-deviled power market,
free market advocates issued last minute warnings against taking the price
cap route espoused by the Cal-ISO. FERC's meeting is scheduled to start at 9
AM EST. (Check http://intelligencepress.com this morning for updates)

In a letter fired off to FERC Chairman James J. Hoecker yesterday, Enron CEO
Kenneth Lay urged the Commission to find a fix for the underlying structural
problems in the power market rather than follow the steps of policy makers
who have placed "price cap 'band aids' over hemorrhaging wounds."

Lay told Hoecker the power market is "halfway across a busy street in its
transition from monopoly to competition. It can't stand where it is." He said
FERC has to make a choice between falling into the "same trap of political
expediency as California's ISO, leaving the nation's electric system in the
lurch from one crisis to the next, [o]r it can take a big step toward
fundamental structural reform."

At the same time the Electric Power Supply Association (EPSA) called on FERC
to issue an emergency cease and desist order prohibiting the Cal-ISO from
"unilaterally implementing" any changes to its current $250/MWh price cap for
wholesale electricity purchases. In a motion filed Monday, the marketer group
specifically asked the Commission to bar the Cal-ISO board of directors from
putting into effect its decision to impose a fiendishly complex
load-differentiated price cap of $100 or less during the off-peak season
effective Nov. 3. The plan was designed by the state's main utility consumer
group (see Daily GPI, Oct. 30). In addition, the EPSA urged FERC to "state
explicitly" that the Cal-ISO does not have the authority to impose or extend
price or bid caps, unless expressly authorized to do so by the Commission.
The Cal-ISO's current authority to set price caps expires on Nov. 15.

Lay said the Cal-ISO's complicated new formula caps prices below the cost of
gas-fired generation, "making obvious errors such as failing to take into
account gas transportation costs between the Henry Hub and power plants in
California; in doing so the bid cap makes it more economic for generators to
sell their gas supply, rather than use it to make electricity in California."
The new formula also forces the ISO into the market to buy power on an ad hoc
basis "to keep the lights on when the capped market fails to attract
sufficient supplies (which it inevitably will do)," Lay said. In addition,
the capped formula "invites generators to shut in production, export power
out of state and deploy their turbines in other states or countries."

He noted that the ISO's Chairman voted against the measure while all of the
state's utilities voted for it "presumably knowing full well that it simply
will not work."

California is "just the latest failure of partial or compromised open
access," said Lay. "It's time for the Commission to reject this approach.

"The power industry --- the nation's most essential industry --- is mired in
the transition from regulated monopoly to open access and customer choice.
Every step forward has been compromised out of concern for alienating one
vested interest or another. As a result, utilities are free to slow the
interconnection of new generation, withhold equal access to the transmission
system, favor their own sales over those of competitors, miscalculated
available transmission capacity, and exercise control over supposedly
'independent' system operators and reliability organizations.

Lay predicted that installing price caps for political expediency would
"plunge markets into greater uncertainty and discourage new supplies and
conservation methods..."

FERC has to complete the work that it started, said Lay. It has to ensure
that all parties have equal and fair access to transmission by "ending the
special priority for utility uses of the system. Second, FERC must require
transmission owners to separate operation of the monopoly transmission assets
from their other businesses. Third, FERC must take politics out of
transmission system operations by revising governance structures to ensure
independence. Finally, FERC must end its reliance on shortsighted price caps
by putting in place the necessary reforms to allow these markets to operate
efficiently to encourage conservation and attract new supplies."

EPSA said the Cal-ISO board "acted in obvious disregard for the Commission's
orderly processes." It "cannot be permitted to make the Commission's
decisions for it, or to alter so radically market rules, thereby injecting
more uncertainty and confusion in the market and subverting the process for
fashioning fair, effective and comprehensive remedies" for California's
"flawed" electric markets, the group noted.

The EPSA believes that any remedial actions taken by FERC with respect to the
California markets will be "severely compromised" if the Cal-ISO board's
imposition of new prices caps is allowed to take effect.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


Nick,

We may have problems getting the VC location in Houston on  short notice.
We are currently on stand-by. We shall default, if we have no other choice,
to a phone interview.

Vince

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Nick Mooney                           04/18/2000 09:09 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Video Conference with Ross McIntyre

Vince,

you should have received an invitation through lotus notes which outlines the
VC location for the conference call tomorrow.  It is schedule for 4:30pm UK
time (10:30am Houston time)

Ross's background is from Investment banking ex Dresner bank, he has a PhD in
Mathematical and is currently with speedwell weather derivatives where he has
been developing weather derivative pricing and portfolio optimisation tools
which they have been marketing to end-users with weather risks.
The attached word documents are articles that he has written for publication.

regards
Nick Mooney

 - MCS.doc
 - Analytic.doc
 - PAR.doc


Attached is the preliminary Schedule C as of March 30, 2001.   A new Schedule
C will follow as the information is updated.

Thanks
Anita
36753


FYI
----- Forwarded by Scott Bolton/Enron Communications on 02/23/01 08:46 AM
-----

	announcement@ccmi.com
	02/22/01 02:53 PM

		 To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: ONLY 1 MONTH LEFT to reserve your spot at CCMI's exclusive TELECOM
TARIFF WORKSHOP!

ONLY 1 MONTH LEFT to reserve your spot at CCMI's exclusive TELECOM TARIFF
WORKSHOP!

Register today at http://www.ccmi.com/tariffworkshop/ for CCMI's Telecom
Tariff Workshop on March 21, 2001 at the Oxford Hotel, Denver, CO.

If you can't make this workshop in Denver, check out the remaining 4 dates &
locations in 2001.  We'll cover everything you need to know to start using
telecommunications tariffs.  Plus, we'll unveil timesaving tips for finding
information you need using CCMI's TelView Tariff Library.

Part I of the workshop focuses on general Tariff Training.  Part II covers
using the TelView Tariff Library.

When you attend, you will:

*   Discover the differences between General Exchange Tariffs, Access
Tariffs, "Negotiated Tariffs", and how they can help you.
*   Find out how tariffs are organized, so you can find exactly what you're
looking for.
*   Learn where to find tariff sections like Switched and Special Access,
Local Calling Areas and Plans, ISDN, and more.
*   Get searching tips that'll save you hours of time when using TelView's
search functions.
*   Find out how to use TelView's convenient bookmarks to zero in on key
tariff sections.
*   And much more!

SEATING IS LIMITED TO 50 and at $139 - breakfast buffet, morning
refreshments, lunch and valuable course materials included - they won't last
long! Every workshop last year was a sellout!

TWO EASY WAYS TO REGISTER:
1) Register online today at http://www.ccmi.com/tariffworkshop/
2) Call the CCMI Conference Department at 1-800-260-1545.

Don't Delay! Register your whole department TODAY!!

CCMI's Telecom Tariff Workshop Emails are intended to inform you of exclusive
CCMI conferences.  To unsubscribe to this service, please reply to this
message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.


Sara,

1. Bank of America uses ADP, a third party, to process al of its trades.
BofA indicated that ADP process trades for "75% of Wall Street" and that they
have confidentiality agreements in place with ADP.

2. BofA also uses a statement vendor to process account statements.  Again,
BofA indicated that they have confidentiality agreements in place with such
vendor.

Suggested language -    "Clearing Broker may disclose Confidential
Information to third parties to the extent necessary to facilitate orders and
to perform its services and obligations hereunder"

Let me know what you think.

Jason


Harry --

I think that this makes alot of sense.  I like working through AReM on this as much as possible.

When is the next deadline?

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Kingerski, Harry
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:08 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject: RE: Motion of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) for Adoption of an Electric Procurement Cost Recovery Mechanism and for Order Shortening Time

Summary first, comments second.

Short read of SDGE proposal:

Plan establishes procurement and recovery strategy for SDGE as standard offer provider post Jan 1, 2003.  Procurement plan would be submitted annually for PUC approval with ongoing discussions to allow modifications to plan as needed.
Supply side of plan comes from URG (SONGS, QFs, PGE and other bilateral contracts - about 1/4 of total requirement), state resources (DWR and CPA), and market purchases (short and long term, fixed and variable, peaking) in that order.  -     SDGE takes no responsibility for administering state-owned resources.  Takes only what is needed and not obligated to take anyting more.  Long term products procured through RFPs.
-    Most details of portfolio kept confidential, except load forecast and RFP process.
Demand side of plan is load forecast, net of DA load.
-     DA load is identified through 90 day open enrollment period that starts 180 days before procurement plan is submitted.  Over 20 kW customers commit to 5 year departure.  Smaller customers commit to 1 year departure.
-    Departing customers pay exit fee for DWR and URG costs.  Premature returns pay re-entry fee and spot pricing.
-    Departures not official until PUC rules on the procurement plan.
Cost recovery through a PCAM (Procurement Cost Adjustment Mechanism).  Two components - energy (including ancillary services), and a balancing account adjustment component.
-    each component is adjusted monthly.
Other policy gems thrown out for discussion:
-    State must maintain strong procurement role; e.g. administer DWR contracts, consider combining generating assets under State portfolio management
-    PA-style auction of standard offer, with departing customers treated the same as DA.

Direction of comments (through AReM would seem fine):

Departure should not be limited to open enrollment periods.  During open enrollment, certain amount of load, at least amount that would be supplied by market purchases, should be designated as fee-less.  During other times, departure is permitted with appropriate exit fee.
Appropriate exit fee must be based on truly unavoidable costs and have not already been recovered through AB 1890 CTCs.
Re-entry fee should only be required if returning customer wants PCAM.  Otherwise, customer gets spot price and there is no fee.
5-yr and 1-yr commitment periods mean nothing and should be eliminated.  Returning customers get spot price or buy their way into PCAM.
Pricing data used for PCAM should not be confidential.  Customers should know their risk exposure when buying PCAM - what's the portfolio, term of contracts, pricing volatility, etc.  Otherwise customer is kept in dark, not knowing pay they are paying for.
Long term solution is auction or similar disposition of customers to market.  Solution is not for state to take over power plant management.

Sue - let's you and I talk first.  Is AReM going to comment?

-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Kingerski, Harry; Mara, Susan
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT ! : Motion of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) for Adoption of an Electric Procurement Cost Recovery Mechanism and for Order Shortening Time

Harry -- Can you please review and provide input on comments?  Especially as it relates to keeping open the San Diego market.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 9:41 AM
To: Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan
Subject: FW: IMPORTANT ! : Motion of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) for Adoption of an Electric Procurement Cost Recovery Mechanism and for Order Shortening Time

FYI.  We should discuss.

Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 2:14 PM
To: Vicki Sandler; Tamara Johnson; Mara, Susan; Steve Huhman; Roger Pelote; Rob Nichol; Randy Hickok; Nam Nguyen; Jim Crossen; Dasovich, Jeff; Janie Mollon; Jack Pigott; Greg Blue; George Vaughn; Gary Ackerman; Ed Cazalet; Denice Cazalet Purdum; Curtis Kebler; Curt Hatton; Corby Gardiner; Charles Miessner; Carolyn Baker; Bill Ross; Karen Shea; Max Bulk
Subject: IMPORTANT ! : Motion of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) for Adoption of an Electric Procurement Cost Recovery Mechanism and for Order Shortening Time

Yesterday, SDG&E filed a motion for adoption of an electric procurement cost recovery mechanism and for an order shortening time for parties to file comments on the mechanism.  The attached email from SDG&E contains the motion, an executive summary, and a detailed summary of  their proposals and recommendations governing procurement of the net short energy requirements for SDG&E's customers.  The utility requests a 15-day comment period, which means comments would have to be filed by September 10 (September 8 is a Saturday).  Reply comments would be filed 10 days later.

The filing provides the following discussion of direct access:

  _____

"Developing the net short requirements of consumers depends on the extent to which they might be served instead by third party providers. The level of direct access will affect these net short requirements. At present, there is substantial uncertainty concerning the future disposition of direct access and third party supply of retail customers that jeopardizes creation of an optimal plan. This uncertainty has the potential for increasing costs to San Diego retail customers as a result of unnecessary over- or under commitments. To resolve this uncertainty, the Commission needs to coordinate direct access with resource planning, at least on an interim basis. SDG&E discusses below how to provide for this coordination.

As the retail market matures, SDG&E expects that direct access elections will gain stability and will not be characterized by severe volatility. That stability will allow planners to make reasoned assumptions on direct access and rely on them in developing a procurement plan. However, today, direct access is subject to substantial uncertainty. Before the high prices of the summer of 2000, approximately 20% of SDG&E's retail load had elected direct access. By the beginning of 2001, direct access had reduced by nearly half. More recently, SDG&E has seen an increase in direct access, perhaps as a result of two factors: first, would direct access customers be able to avoid paying a share of CDWR contract costs, and second, would the state suspend direct access, as appears to be permitted under ABx-1 1. Furthermore, the legislature is considering legislation that would permit direct access, and other bills that would encourage municipal aggregation of load. The effect of this latter bill is similar to direct access, but it could cause large quantities of load to leave or return to the system quite abruptly.

These events illustrate the need for added coordination between direct access and resource planning. The necessary coordination could come by using an open enrollment period each planning cycle under which direct access elections take place. During that enrollment period, the utility is provided information on the amount of load electing direct access (or municipal aggregation) and the length of the direct access commitment. This open enrollment period would last for 90 days and commence 180 days before SDG&E is scheduled to submit its procurement plan. Customers over 20kW would make commitments to service by suppliers other than SDG&E of at least 5 years. Smaller customers would make minimum one year commitments. These commitments and the use of a specific enrollment period would provide SDG&E with the information it needs to plan to meet net short requirements and minimize the risk of over- or under-commitment.

In order to ensure an orderly process that protects consumers, change of service would not occur until the commission ruled on the procurement plan, and, to the extent that the commission determined that excessive direct access placed an unreasonable burden on utility customers, it could choose to limit direct access. Those electing to leave utility procurement would pay an exit fee to cover the costs of commitments made by CDWR and utility retained generation committed to those customers in order to protect remaining customers. As a result of this change, SDG&E would not plan to provide commodity service to departing customers. Customers returning from direct access prematurely would be subject to a re-entry fee and to spot energy pricing, again to protect those customers who did not elect to switch.

Coordinating direct access with the planning process, at least for a near-term period, is important to ensuring a reasonable procurement plan."

  _____

The filing also briefly discusses competitive default supplier role:

  _____

"When the State embarked on industry restructuring, one purpose was to take advantage of the benefits that competitive markets can provide. Although California's experience with markets has not been as anticipated, it is still possible that a disciplined application of the market with adequate regulatory oversight can offer advantages to consumers. In fact, some states have undertaken to use the competitive market to meet customers' net short requirements. For example, in parts of Pennsylvania, the State decided to auction off a piece of the procurement obligation to the competitive market. California may decide that it wants to do the same type of thing. If a portion of the net short is auctioned off in this manner, from a planning standpoint, it should be treated the same as direct access: SDG&E will need adequate notice and information to facilitate its planning for any net short position remaining to be served, and the same use of exit fees and re-entry fees should also apply."

  _____

There are a number of issues here which I think WPTF may want to comment upon, as we have dealt with many of these issues in previous filings.  Please let me (and others) know if you agree.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Evans, Darleen <mailto:DEvans@sempra.com>

Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 4:49 PM
Subject: Motion of San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) for Adoption of an Electric Procurement Cost Recovery Mechanism and for Order Shortening Time

<<A.01-01-044 Procurement Plan(v1).DOC>> <<A.01-01-044 Exc. Summary(v1).DOC>> <<A.01-01-044 Motion(v1).DOC>>

_________________________________

Darleen Evans

Sempra Energy - Law Department

619-699-5056

devans@sempra.com <mailto:devans@sempra.com>


I have forwarded yor e-mail to Michelle Cash. Hopefully, she can answer your
questions

	Eileen Kisluk@ENRON
	09/22/2000 08:07 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rob Cole/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: R & C Trucks, Inc. v. ENA (Van Scoyk auto incident of 2/9/00)

Richard - -

This matter is riddled with insurance law and employment law issues.  If the
independent contractor is deemed to be an employee under Wyoming law, then
our insurance may come into play.  However, this has more significant
implications under the employment arena.  A very valid argument exists if he
is deemed to have been  an employee, then employment benefits may be due and
owing.  I am somewhat familiar with these issues as I dealt with a similar
issue for Enron Oil & Gas many years ago.

Who should I visit with regarding employment related issues?  Furthermore, if
we have "independent contractors" driving their personal automobiles in
discharging their duties, if they do not procure the correct insurance we
will be facing this issue in the future. More specifically, when an
individual places auto insurance they must tell the insurer that they are
driving in their vehicle for business purposes, otherwise the insurer will
deny coverage on these grounds. This is one of the issues that we are facing
here.

I await your response.

- - EWK


---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 02:37 PM
---------------------------

Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON
04/24/2000 10:44 AM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bandwidth on EOL customer list

Tana,

Attached please find customer list (sent by EBS) for bandwidth trading on
EOL. Please review it and send me your comments. We are planning on launching
the products on May 1st.  Also, I am attaching the GTC that Cynthia Harkness
from EBS put together.

Please let me know if you have any questions

Thank you!

Leonardo Pacheco
ext. 39938


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Gas/Power Risk Mgmt PRC Double Tree - deZavala Room

Date:		6/5/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 2:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Hello Eric,

It was great to speak with you this afternoon.  Thank you for taking my phone call.  As mentioned, Intercontinental Staffing Group is primarily focused on serving the energy trading industry, bringing together top energy trading talent with the worlds leading energy trading companies.  Our search consultants have past experience in either trading or brokering energy commodities.  This gives us a distinct advantage with respect to our knowledge of and exposure to the energy trading industry.

We are currently working on filling several trading and marketing/origination positions throughout the US.  If you know of someone who is looking for a new career opportunity, please contact me at the phone number listed below or feel free to email me at possibilities@istaffinggroup.com.  Also, please refer to our website - www.istaffinggroup.com - for a complete listing of the open positions.  We do offer a referral fee if we are successful in placing one of your recommendations.

Any information provided will be completely confidential.  Thank you for your time.  I look forward to speaking with you.

Sincerely,

Gary Pitt
Director
Intercontinental Staffing Group Inc.
Phone:  (713) 850-8399
Fax:  (713) 850-7746
Cell Phone:  (281) 467-0022
email:  possibilities@istaffinggroup.com


Start Date: 10/8/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001100822.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Attached please find a changed Talking Points -

1. Tries to better finesse the rate increase proposal by limiting increase to
10%;
2. Corrects the cost of new generation - 4,000 MW costs $3.6 billion not $360
million;
3. Clarifies that CDWR's problem is paying off the debt, not just paying for
electricity.

Thanks,

Jim


We have parking with PNM for off-peak on Monday.  The energy schedule is as
follows.  The energy is at 4C but you should be able to move it to PV with
PNM if you ask nicely.  We will split the upside over $35 with ST SW via
annuity.  Please make all transmission purchases or other sales under their
book.

Deal number on the buy from PNM is #581199.

The shape of this length is:

HE1 50
HE2 50
HE3 50
HE4 50
HE5 45
HE6 20
HE23 35
HE24 50

Day total is 350.

Thanks
Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Adams, Matthew
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 4:07 PM
To:	Port, David; Murphy, Ted; Curry, Wanda; Brackett, Debbie R.
Subject:	1999's CFO Excellence Award Winner

Interesting reading.  Here's a quote:
Fastow's expert balancing act, in fact, has earned him this year's CFO Excellence Award for Capital Structure Management. "We needed someone to rethink the entire financing structure at Enron from soup to nuts," says Jeffrey K. Skilling, Enron president and chief operating officer. "We didn't want someone stuck in the past, since the industry of yesterday is no longer. Andy has the intelligence and the youthful exuberance to think in new ways. He deserves every accolade tossed his way."

http://www.cfo.com/article/1,4616,0|1|AD|1340,00.html


Shelley,

         I was shut-out of the click-at-home program before I got a P.C. ordered and was wondering what the status, is on some of the surplus
computer equipment that is still in the building. I am guessing that there is some left of the same quality or better, than that offered in the
program. Maybe you could start a after Chrismas gift sale. Because it was my idea you could give me mine for free  Ha!

                                                                                Thanks Ron Spain


At 6/16/2000, Tom Beach wrote:
>On behalf of Watson and Vernon, I strongly object to the removal of the data
>on the takeaway capacity to other markets besides the SoCalGas system, as
>Norman apparently proposes in his draft exhibit.  Without the data on
>takeaway capacity to other markets, the exhibit suggests that all of the
>upstream interstate and PG&E capacity is designed to serve just the SoCalGas
>market.

The question is not what is designed to "serve" the SoCalGas market, but
what is the upstream capacity flowing to SoCal's interconnection points
that could theoretically serve SoCalGas if there was no limitation on
SoCal's takeaway capacity.  Based on this, Norman's exhibit seems OK unless
there is some physical system constraint (besides SoCal's takeaway) that
would limit potential inflow into the SoCalGas system.

The problem with SoCal's last exhibit is that there is still no
clarification of whether the upstream gas could flow into ANY ONE of the
take away pipelines.  Maybe this could be clarified somehow (in a footnote)?

Marcel


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2000 05:28
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Nedre Strambler                           04/28/2000 12:42 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Job # 103079

Mark,

This resume is the daughter of a Director in Human Resources.  She has a law
degree and has worked as
a legal assistant/paralegal throughout her career.  I do not think her
background is as strong as some of the other
candidates that you have seen.  But, I decided to send it anyway because it
is an employee referral.  Take
a look at it and let me know what you think.

Nedre
31659
---------------------- Forwarded by Nedre Strambler/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
01:38 PM ---------------------------

UCLAVIC@aol.com on 04/28/2000 12:26:57 PM
To: nedre.strambler@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Job # 103079

 - SILCOX~1.DOC


I do have I-pass and am able to use it EXCEPT when I am in Brazil where I-pass DOES NOT WORK.

IBM Global is a very necessary tool for me when I travel to Brazil.  If there is another viable alternative, please let me know.

Nancy Muchmore
Enron Global Assets and Services
333 Clay St., Suite 2100
Houston, Tx  77002
(713) 646-6197 (phone)
(713) 345-5352 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Peters, Diana
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:49 AM
To:	Anderson, Peter N.; Beltran, Pepi; Blanco, Pedro; Busto, Nilson; Corbet, Nancy; Khamphoukeo, Naphaphone; Muchmore, Nancy; Newman, Nathan; Obrecht, Paulette; Parrish, Paul E.; Parrish, Paula J.; Pebdani, Nasser; Releford, Pete; Solomon, Paula; Squariz, Paulo; Vu, Nancy H.; Weidler, Peter E; Wilson, Nathan; Y'Barbo, Paul; Yeck, Michael
Subject:	IBM or iPass

RSVP

Please note that IBM dial-up is going away.  If you are still using IBM and have NOT been converted to iPass please state why in response to this e:mail.

Thank you in advance for your IMMEDIATE  REPLY.


One of the Contractor's personnel working at TW Station 1 for the Red Rock expansion died of an apparant heart attack this morning at the job site. Just wanted to let you know. sj


My assistant, Taffy Milligan will be sending it to you.

	Martin Rosell
	10/05/2000 08:16 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA

Tana, hope you're doing well.

We'd wish to replicate the terms in the ENA-Utilicorp. United Inc. ISDA
referred to below in a similar contract between ECTRIC and Utilicorp. United
Inc.   Pls send me a electronic copy of the executed contract.  Tks.

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 2000-10-05 15:13
---------------------------

Yumi Takei
2000-10-05 13:20
To: Rod Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Karin Levin/LON/ECT@ECT, Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT

Subject: ISDA

Hi!

Thanks for your help.  According to Matt Dawson, it looks like a signed ISDA
has been executed between ENA and Utilicorp United Inc. in the past.  We will
also need an ISDA between ECTRIC and Utilicorp United Inc.  You mentioned
perhaps mirroring the existing ISDA however with the restricted lists I
believe you will be to obtain the copy easier than we will.  However, if you
would like Utilicorp to produce a draft, let  me know and I can request that
from the woman in the e.mail below.

Please advise and I will pass the information on to Utilicorp.

Thank you
Yumi
x34708

---------------------- Forwarded by Yumi Takei/OSL/ECT on 05/10/2000 13:16
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Weber, Angela" <AWeber@utilicorp.com>
03/10/2000 19:33

To: "'yumi.takei@enron.com'" <yumi.takei@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: ISDA

Hi Yumi,

I did confirm with our weather desk that we will be transacting as Utilicorp
United Inc.  Sorry for the confusion!  How do you want to proceed on the
ISDA?

Thanks,

Angela Weber
Aquila Energy
Associate Contract Specialist
1100 Walnut Street, Suite 3100
Kansas City, MO 65106
Phone:  816-527-1293
Fax:  816-527-4293
e-mail:  aweber@utilicorp.com


Great job with Ty!  Now what about the rest of us?
-----Original Message-----
From: jbrewer.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com [mailto:jbrewer.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:00 PM
To: chenson.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; bshook.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; jswank.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; dgonzale.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com; texex@texas.net; neecee@netsync.net; plucci@enron.com; llocke.LEATHERCENTER@leathercenter.com
Subject: FW: It's the Great Pumpkin Charlie Brown!

jeffw@worldstrides.com
12/13/2001 02:35 PM EST

To: peer.ebbighausen@unistudios.com, jbrewer@leathercenter.com
cc:
bcc:
Subject: FW: It's the Great Pumpkin Charlie Brown!

-----Original Message-----
From:Craig Smith
Sent:Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:00 AM
To:Julie Zangara; Jeff Whitt
Subject:FW: It's the Great Pumpkin Charlie Brown!

Police arrested Malcolm Davidson, a 27 year old white male, resident of
Wimbledon, in a pumpkin patch at 11:38 pm Friday. Davidson will be
charged with lewd and lascivious behavior, public indecency, and public
intoxication at the County courthouse on Monday.

The suspect allegedly stated that as he was passing a pumpkin patch, he
decided to stop. "You know, a pumpkin is soft and squishy inside, and
there was no one around here for miles. At least I thought there
wasn't," he stated in a phone interview from the County courthouse jail.
Davidson went on to state that he pulled over to the side of the road,
picked out a pumpkin that he felt was appropriate to his purposes, cut a
hole in it and proceeded to satisfy his alleged "need". "I guess I was
just really into it, you know?" he commented with evident embarrassment.

In the process, Davidson apparently failed to notice the Wimbledon
Municipal police car approaching and was unaware of his audience until
officer Brenda Taylor approached him. "It was an unusual situation,
that's for sure," said officer Taylor. "I walked up to (Davidson) and
he's...just working away at this pumpkin." Taylor went on to describe
what happened when she approached Davidson.

"I just went up and said, "Excuse me sir, but do you realize that you
are screwing a pumpkin?" He got real surprised as you'd expect and then
looked me straight in the face and said, 'A pumpkin? Damn... is it
midnight already?"


Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 12/17.


Attached is a spreadsheet of customers attending the TW Customer Update meeting in November please verify that names and company are correct.  Marketing your customers are highlighted in RED.  Please make necessary changes and return to me.

Thanks,
Ava


Vince,
Hopefully you have had a chance to look at Mr. Valverde's resume.  Please
let me know if you have an interest in talking with him or not.
Thank you.

Johan

JOHAN C. DAHL
Director Energy Staffing Group
Management Recruiters of Portland, Inc.
Phone: 503-290-1153
Fax: 503-282-4380
E-mail: jdahl@mrportland.com
Web: http://www.mrportland.com


----- Original Message -----
To: JEFF.RICHTER@ENRON.COM
At:  7/ 9 10:43

Just a reminder that Bloomberg will be hosting a free energy seminar this
Wednesday (7/11) at 1:30 pm at the Heathman Hotel in downtown Portland.  To see
a description of what will be covered as well as to sign up to secure your
spot, go to BU <GO> on your Bloomberg.  Select #2 (Events and Seminars in your
Region).  Choose Portland.  The energy seminar is the only menu option.  If you
have any questions feel free to contact me at 415-912-2978.  This should be a
very informative session that will discuss different aspects of Bloomberg's
energy product.  Kristin Hordyke


PGL and North Shore converted part of their index supply deal into a  fixed price, locking in basis.  Please amend the existing supply deal to reflect this change and confirm the supply contract ammendment as we discussed.  Feel free to call me if you have any questions.

PGL	06/01-10/02     5000 mmbtu/d	    .135	     Basis only
NS          06/01-10/02    1250  mmbtu/d             .135         Basis only

Jim


why the hell were you invited?

Shanna Husser@ENRON
05/30/2000 09:34 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bryan Hull is moving on. Let's celebrate !!!

I love how I am included on the risk outing e-mail distribution list.  I mean
why would I need to take a job in your department when I get e-mails about
all the events anyway?
---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron on 05/30/2000
09:31 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Yvette G Connevey                           05/30/2000 09:24 AM

To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Shawna
Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carey M
Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W
Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Richardson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tom
Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Bryan Hull is moving on. Let's celebrate !!!

Yes, we have finally suckered some other Enron group into taking on Bryan
Hull.  Just teasin', Bryan's last day with the Risk Team will be this Friday,
June 2nd.  It wouldn't be right if we didn't send him off without his well
deserved roasting.

This Thursday evening at 5:30 we will gather at Teala's on W. Dallas to bid
Bryan farewell.

For future reference, Bryan will be joining the EOL group on the 26th floor
on Monday, June 5th.  His extension will be the same so feel free to continue
to harass him.

See ya there!

If, in haste, we have left anyone off our distribution please forward the
invite on.

Thanx!
Yvette


FYI.

Brasher  Excellent
Clements Strong
Fenstad Satisfactory

12/12/2000 02:26 PM
Morris Brassfield
Morris Brassfield
Morris Brassfield
12/12/2000 02:26 PM
12/12/2000 02:26 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Ratings

From casual observations, I cannot dispute your ratings.   I do feel that
Dave needs to step up to the plate and start delivering some new and creative
solutions for outstanding issues.  He has the capabilities.   It seems he
tends to manage too much by wandering around and not taking the lead.

I fully support Barney's rating, but could see both Dave and Larry's ratings
being on the lower edge of the recommended ratings.

I will do all I can to shore up the organization by placing some expectations
for improvements before the whole group and dividing up the accountabilities
accordingly.

I fully support what you have recommended.

Rod Hayslett

12/12/2000 01:53 PM
To: Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Ratings

 Brasher  Excellent
 Clements Strong
 Fenstad Satisfactory

These are my thoughts based upon general knowledge of the year and some
specifics for the last few months.     A short discussion with Phil might
lead me to believe that he would think I might be being too generous on
Dave.     What are your thoughts?


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042519.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 19 / Preferred: -250.00 / Final: -200.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/25/01
  TRADING_SC: ECH1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


i will let you out of the bet for $20


In response to the tragic events of September 11th and due to popular demand, eSource is offering a valuable Country Risk Analysis for those monitoring global implications and risk due to recent developments in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India.

This report, prepared by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) and available through eSource at no charge, contains the following information:

?          Political Background
?          Country Infrastructure
?          Economic Policy and Sectors
?          Trade

To request a copy of this report logon to http://esource.enron.com/RequestSearch.asp <http://esource.enron.com/RequestSearch.asp>

Submit your request online by entering applicable employee data in the required fields and referencing "EIU Pakistan/Afghanistan" or "EIU India" in the "Describe Request" box.

eSource continues to provide additional country risk and analysis information from a variety of reputable sources including CountryWatch.com and World Markets Country Analysis & Forecast, which can be accessed at http://esource.enron.com/ <http://esource.enron.com/>  Select "The World" from the right tool bar and then "Country Reports."

If you are not interested in receiving these messages in the future, please let us know, and we will kindly adjust our mailing list.


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


thanks for the info and good luck.

David P Dupre
01/02/2001 10:58 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: update

Hi, I have moved to a new group. My replacement's name is Jason Fischer at
5-3207.

David


Transwestern Pipeline Co. posted new notice(s) since our last check at
12/13/2000 1:30:01 PM, the newest notice looks like:

 Capacity Constraint, Dec 13 2000  1:48PM, Dec 14 2000  9:00AM, Dec 15 2000
8:59AM, 2237, Allocation - SOCAL NEEDLES

Please click the following to go to the web site for detail.

http://ios.ets.enron.com/infoPostings/shared/et_noncritical_notice.asp?company
=60


How about 100?

	From:  Rebecca Walker                           05/11/2001 08:49 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Blue Dog Meeting Today

Kay

When are you available today to get together and call Ben about the Blue Dog
invoices?  As far as I know, Ben's only conflict today is a meeting from 2-3
(Houston time), and I can come up to your office any time.

Also, an attorney from King & Spalding (I believe she said her name was
Marisa Rudder?) left a message for me last night asking about the status of
the original closing documents for the Blue Dog/Northwestern transaction.  Do
you know where these are?

Thanks,
Rebecca
x57968
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001
08:44 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           05/10/2001 07:30 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Rebecca Walker
cc:

Subject: Re: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Rebecca:

Please coordinate a time with Kay that will work. I will be in CA and will
join by phone.

Thanks,

Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 07:29 PM
---------------------------

Kay Mann@ENRON
05/10/2001 08:29 AM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@ECT
Subject: Re: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Looks like Friday will work.

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           05/09/2001 07:12 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Chris Booth/NA/Enron, Kay Mann

Subject: Re: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Before we send anything other than the "thank you" e-mail I sent to Jeff, and
before we have any conversations with GE on this point, we need to seek Kay's
guidance based on her read of the contract and the issues Jeff raised in his
letter.

Kay - will you have some time to talk about this Friday?

Regards,

Ben

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca Walker @ ENRON                           05/09/2001 01:39 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Ben

The way we actually paid the invoices changed slightly after Chris had sent
the letter to GE.  We deducted the LD's and the retention amount from the
April 25th invoice (since the May invoice was not due until May 25th).

On May 8th, a wire totalling $1,671,039 was sent to GE -- this represented
$469,000 for the c/o #2 invoice and $1,202,039 for the April 25th invoice
less the LD's and retention.

To respond to Jeff Darst's letter, we can say that we are planning on paying
the May 25th invoice in full (assuming we're not planning on deducting
additional LD's for May 8-May 25).

We just need to clarify with Jeff that both the LD and the retention were
deducted from the April invoice, and then we can deal with resolving the
issues he discusses in his letter.

Regards,
Rebecca
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron on 05/09/2001
01:22 PM ---------------------------

jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com on 05/09/2001 01:18:59 PM
To: chris.booth@enron.com
cc: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, chasecl@pssch.ps.ge.com, john.schroeder@ps.ge.com,
stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, Rebecca.Walker@enron.com

Subject: payment of invoices, Blue Dog Max

Chris,

Please see attached letter, original to follow via FedEx.

 <<Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf>>
 <<Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf>>

 - Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf
 - Microsoft Word - BDM002.pdf


If we appeal and win it will be helpful to our claim against TVA  related to
the control area dispute. . While we have not heard it yet, TVA will argue
that although TVA did not use the same rational as Entergy to deny parking,
Enron has no damages because of the  FERC ruling. What are our chances of
winning?

 By copy of this e-mail I will ask our outside counsel, Bob Madden, to
comment on how he thinks the FERC ruling can and will be used against us.

	Christi L Nicolay
	08/10/2000 04:27 PM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Entergy s&s

Do you think we should appeal Entergy source and sink FERC order?  While I
think it is a poorly written order that shows a lack of understanding of the
issue, I'm not sure that we can win on appeal or that it is worth appealing,
since we would not recover our damages against ComEd and TVA for this summer
while the order is in effect.  It would be helpful next summer to be able to
park in ComEd and TVA, since the RTOs will not be running in all likelihood.

Elizabeth/Richard -- Is there a reason in the TVA litigation  that we need to
appeal the decision?

Otherwise, Joe, should we get Dan W. to draft a memo on chances of success or
other reasons for filing an appeal?


Here's one for you to chew on for awhile.  As we approach the transition to a
new organizational structure in ET&S, let's rethink the role and competencies
of the legal department.  I'd like each of you to answer the following
questions and circulate your answers to me and each other.  To avoid having
anyone's answers unduly influenced by anyone else's, please send your
responses at 12 noon on Thursday.  No, this isn't being graded, and doesn't
affect the PRC process or any other process.  I just want to get access to as
much original thinking as possible.

1.  What is the ET&S law dept. currently best at?  (give one example).

2.  What is the ET&S law dept. currently worst at?  (give one example).

3.  Without regard for any past objectives, what should our top 3 objectives
be?  (make these very specific--objectives like "We should manage legal and
regulatory compliance and optimize shareholder value"  don't cut it).

Thanks for your responses.  DF


FYI...the locals are turning up the heat.

MR
----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 05/15/2001 04:07 PM -----

	Eric Thode
	05/15/2001 01:37 PM

		 To: Greg Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, charlotte@bitner.com, Lea Sooter/ENRON@enronXgate,
orshefskyd@gtlaw.com, barshk@gtlaw.com, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Rose/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc:
		 Subject: War in Florida!

I suspect that I am not going to receive a birthday present or Christmas card
from this fellow.  What do you think?  This is the type of e-mail that we
usually receive from our friends in California.  Looks like the disease is
spreading to other areas.

Eric

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Thode/Corp/Enron on 05/15/2001 01:33
PM ---------------------------
From: Cindy Derecskey on 05/15/2001 01:14 PM
To: Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vance
Meyer/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: War in Florida!

----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 05/15/2001 01:13 PM -----

	"J J" <spindoctor@hotmail.com>
	05/15/2001 12:43 PM

		 To: public-relations@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: War in Florida!

Enron, do you want war in Florida?

You're going to get it! Take your fat, lawsuit-happy-pig Eric Thode and get
the fuck out of South Florida!

Take your greedy peaker plants and build them in India where you already
have a track record of beating and helping to kill locals who protested you
there.

The nerve of you pricks trying to build plants in family communities and on
the edge of our National Park.

We will stop you!

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


August 29, 30, 31
You will be receiving more information from Rick and Cindy, but here are the
dates for the offsite Rick and Cindy are hosting to:
 Assess what we have accomplished with SAP relative to the original goals
 Assess where we are today (new initiatives on the horizon, acquisition
strategy, state of the COE, etc)
 Determine strategically where we go next.

For those that participated in either or both of the original ASEs
(Accelerated Solutions Environment, a professionally facilitated,
specially-designed location for rapid, large-group decision making), this
event will be similar in format (not content).  If you have not previously
particpated in an ASE, detailed information will be forthcoming.

The likely location is Dallas (a new ASE has just been opened there).  We MAY
be able to trim this down to two days (not probable, but we are going to
try), but for now please plan on 3 full days (8 am to 7 pm or later).

The above is not the final invitee list (we will likely add a few more
people), but we wanted to geet this on your calendars as soon as we had the
date.  Please let me know as soon as possible if you will or will not be able
to attend, and if there is anyone from your organization that you feel is
critical to achieving the objectives above.

Thank you!