Thanks,

your humble servant,

Frank

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Neal, Scott
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:45 PM
To:	Vickers, Frank
Subject:	RE: TBG

good job, Frank.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vickers, Frank
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:31 PM
To:	Ring, Andrea
Cc:	Neal, Scott; Barbe, Robin
Subject:	TBG

Andy, I have completed negotiation with TBG on the Settlement.  TBG has executed the documents and Louise and John have approved the deal.  In short, I want to make sure that you understand the effect on you.  Attached is a more detailed summary but generally I removed all swing flexibility from the deal.  They have baseload obligations of 12,500 MMBtu per day.  We can deliver at any of the delivery points identified in the Agreement ( I will give you a copy of the Agreements) however the primary delivery point is Station 65.  That is the location for all price settlements.  If we delivery at an alternate location we receive additional basis differentials for moving downstream ( Station 85 )  and we pay the basis differential for moving upstream ( Sta 45, 30 ). TBG has the right to move our deliveries back to Sta 65 at anytime, if we are delivering at alternate locations. I want to check with you one more time before I execute the final documents.  I think that this is a great trade for ENA if I do say so myself.  My next effort is to clear up any issues with Trigen.

Frank

 << File: TBG Settlement Terms.doc >>


Jason:

In connection with the above captioned invoice, there are two entries for
"T.J. Perich" ($850) for reviewing underlying swap documents, opinion.

Is this your New York lawyer handling the SMUD opinion?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Attached are our power point slides laying out the time line for FERC
action.  The estimated time frames for FERC action, even without a
settlement, are somewhat more positive than we discussed yesterday (e.g.,
FERC order on the merits after a technical conference by mid-February).
Also, the group is somewhat optimistic that the FERC order in November could
be an order on the merits, without additional proceedings such as a technical
conference or a hearing.  These optimistic time tables are based on the
assumption that Sierra will not take any action that will alienate or annoy
FERC, which could result in a slowdown in FERC's approval process.

Adam Wenner, Steve Angle, Sam Behrends, Joanne Rutkowski and I all discussed
the various time frames that are laid out in the slides, but they have not
seen the slides, so we would like to reserve the right to amend the slides
once everyone has a chance to review them.  Also, as we discussed yesterday,
we would like to be able to revise the slides, if necessary, tomorrow once we
get FERC's agenda for its November 8 meeting and we see what action FERC
takes in the California investigation on price spikes this past summer.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Sarah


Attached is a resume of Debra Ruby who I have known for many years.  She is
currently looking for a position in Houston as a corporate attorney.  I can
personally recommend Debra for a variety of legal positions within Enron.  I
would appreciate it if you reviewed her attached resume and if you think
there may be a fit within your organization, please contact her directly.

Thanks for taking the time to look at her experience.


Yes, it's been killed. Thanks for checking on that.

Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
02/13/2001 06:03 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal # 508797

Hello, we have a fully executed termination letter for deal # 508797.01.
Holli Krebs is aware that this BPA deal was going to be terminated.  Are you
all going to kill this deal?

Thanks,
Melissa


Cheryl/Sam:  Please update Sheila.  SS

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001 01:25 PM -----

	Sheila Glover
	01/11/2001 12:47 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Israel Estrada/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aneela
Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Authorized Signers

Sara and Samantha,
When will ECT Investments be signed so we can send an updated copy to our
Prime brokers?
Thanks. Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001 12:41
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           01/03/2001 10:17 AM

To: William Patrick Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aneela Charania/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T
Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Authorized Signers

Patrick and Michelle,
We added both of you to the list for Authorized Signers for ECT Investments,
Inc.  for transfer of funds.  Authorization requires one commercial and one
commercial support signature.
Thanks. Sheila

Current Authorized Signers for transfer of funds for ECT Investments, Inc.
are M. Bradley, J. Greene, G. Hickerson, P. Lewis and M. Ruch.


I have created the following new Product Type in the Data Manager:

US East Power Phy Firm ICAP

Please go into the DataManager and indicate your approval. If you have any
questions concerning the Product Type, please DO NOT REJECT it, rather call
me instead.

I have attached a full description of the Product that will be built under
this Product Type for your review.

Dale
3-9746


This triggers Delta's obligation to fund the escrow, which now must occur on
or before April 20.  If they get their financing in order, it will fund
sooner. Therefore, Carlos is working on the drafts of TurboPark documents.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/12/2001 05:13
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/12/2001 04:46:26 PM
To: "'gregorylang@paulhastings.com'" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>,
"'rvicens@deltapower.com'" <rvicens@deltapower.com>
cc: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Keffer, John"
<JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: FW: Salmon Energy Turbine Agreement

Gentlemen:

On behalf of Enron North America Corp., and pursuant to Section 4(b) of the
Letter Agreement dated April 4, 2001 between Enron North America Corp. and
Pegasus Power Partners, LLC, we have enclosed the final form of the Turbine
Contract to be executed by and between GE Packaged Power, Inc. and Salmon
Energy LLC pertaining to the purchase of four turbines, together with a
blacklined copy marked to reflect changes from the form of agreement
attached as Exhibit B to the Letter Agreement and which was furnished to you
by e-mail on April 3, 2001 from Kay Mann.  If we may be of any further
assistance, please contact me.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

(See attached file: Comparison of Salmon Energy Agreement, Versions 3 to
4.DOC)
(See attached file: Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 4.DOC)

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Comparison of Salmon Energy Agreement, Versions 3 to 4.DOC
 - Salmon Energy Agreement - Version 4.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/31/2001 06:05
PM ---------------------------
From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 05:59 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa
Bills/ENRON@enronXgate, Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate, Roseann
Engeldorf/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Chris Booth/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven Rose/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert P
Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: FW: GE Turbines

All:

FYI, tomorrow I should receive turbine contracts for the 3 GE 7FAs being sold
by Site. Please see the e-mail below from Sithe's advisor regarding the
transaction schedule. Kay and I plan to initially review the contract, and I
have a technical team (Booth / Rose) ready to review the contracts as well.

From an accounting / finance perspective, I am interested in how we should
proceed given the circumstances. Kay and my initial plan is to review the
contracts from a technical / legal / commercial perspective and submit a
revised indicative number by Tuesday in consultation with Duran. Between now
and then, it would be helpful to know from accounting / finance how we should
proceed given that we are in a bidding situation (with I'm told three other
bidders). Herman / Rose / Lisa - please let me know your thoughts on this.

Chip - I would like Chris Booth to work with you on putting a draft DASH
together.

In the meantime, I will forward turbine contracts to everyone as soon as I
receive them.

Regards,

Ben

 -----Original Message-----
From:  MKolman@rcgroup.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-MKolman+40rcgroup+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:40 PM
To: Ben.F.Jacoby@enron.com
Subject: Re: GE Turbines

Ben:

Per our conversation today, the turbine contract and LTSA are being sent
via Fed Ex to your office in Houston.

Final bids are due next Tuesday, June 5th via fax to 781-270-0055.  Bids
should include best price and a closing schedule (date by which bidder will
have all internal approvals necessary to enter into a binding agreement
with Seller subject only to consent from GE).

Thanks again for you patience and please call me if you have any questions,

Michael

================
Michael A. Kolman
Principal
Navigant Capital
(781) 564-9774 (direct)


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 11/19/01.   The Yuma Companies (Inc.) has been added to this week's "Call Credit" column.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923,  Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or Darren Vanek at x3-1436.


NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: DAVE KEARNS on
NOVELL NETWARE
12/21/01
Today's focus: Novell 2001: The year of NetWare 6

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* A look back at NetWare 6
* Links related to Novell NetWare
* Featured reader resource

_______________________________________________________________
THE STORAGE OPTIONS

Ever since September 11th, spending on storage has increased.
How are you ensuring that you're choosing the right network
storage options?  Network World's Deni Connor evaluates the
networked storage options. Before you start spending next
year's budget check out what Connor has to say at:
http://nww1.com/go/ad219.html

_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: Novell 2001: The year of NetWare 6

By Dave Kearns

Last issue, we reviewed the performance of Novell over the past
year. This time, we want to look at the products and services
the company provided during 2001.

Right at the top of the list has to be NetWare 6. We started
talking about, and anticipating, NetWare 6 more than a year and
a half ago, but the real discussion didn't start until last
year's BrainShare conference in March. The full set of features
for NetWare 6 was revealed at the conference, including the
brand new technologies, such as iFolder.

NetWare 6 is a worthy successor to the remarkably well-received
NetWare 5 as well as the other ground-breaking versions of the
product going all the way back to Novell's "ShareNet" product
of the early1980s - pre-dating the IBM PC.

In light of the management turnover churn we mentioned in the
last issue, as well as numerous employee layoffs over the past
18 months, it's remarkable that NetWare 6 is as feature-rich as
it is while also being relatively bug-free. Even more
remarkable, compared to some software vendors, it shipped on
time - exactly according to the roadmap released two years ago!

NetWare continues to be Novell's strength even as the company
struggles to present an image as a "services" rather than a
"product" company (and what's wrong with products, anyway?).
The investor community, in particular, seems to have little
regard for the company - even as it continues to use the
software (maybe the investment bankers' IT departments don't
tell the analysts which NOS they're running).

Maybe Novell is finally learning that you, the network
executive, are the ones who can tell the company's story the best.
Take a look at http://www.novell.com/products/netware/whytheylie/ -
it's designed for you. In particular, read "The Factual Truth"and
then start spreading the word about the benefits of superior
technology.

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Dave Kearns:

Dave Kearns is the Word Wrangler for Virtual Quill, a writing
agency serving the computer and networking industries. If
your target customer doesn't know your product, doesn't know
its uses and doesn't know he needs it, he's not going to buy
it. From books to reviews, marketing to manuals, VQ can help
you and your business. Virtual Quill - "words to sell by..."
Find out more at: http://www.vquill.com/, or by e-mail at
mailto:info@vquill.com.
_______________________________________________________________
Promote your services and generate qualified leads!  Register
on Buy IT, NW Fusion's Vendor Directory and RFP Center.  It's
cost-effective and eliminates the headaches of finding new
business.  List your company today and access millions of
dollars in RFPs posted by active buyers.  Go to NW Fusion now!
http://www.nwfusion.newmediary.com/091201nwwprovnwltr1
_______________________________________________________________
RELATED EDITORIAL LINKS

Sneak peek
Network World Novell NetWare Newsletter, 06/07/00
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/netware/2000/0605nw2.html

File replication that saves bandwidth
Network World NetWare Newsletter, 03/28/01
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/netware/2001/00592583.html

Breaking Novell and NetWare news, updated daily:
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/financial/novell.html

Archive of the Novell NetWare newsletter:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/netware/index.html
______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

JOIN IN!

Network World Forums are a great place to voice your opinion
and hear what your peers have to say about a latest product
release or trend in networking. Our Forums cover such topics as
"Should you upgrade to XP?" to a "Help Desk Forum" in which
you can ask the expert advice of Network World Fusion's Help
Desk editor, Ron Nutter. Our Forums are a great way to express
your opinions and interact with your peers.
http://www.nwfusion.com/forum/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Director of
Online Sales, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2001

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


Mark,

Paul would like to start his roadshow with Australian customers next Tuesday
(Monday afternoon, our time).

Could you please review the amendments which David Minns has recommended for
the PA and  ETA today, so that Paul can take a copy of at least the PA with
him when he visits the customers?

Thanks,

Dave


Gary,
What is the status of this?
HC
---------------------- Forwarded by Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT on 12/29/99 10:06
AM ---------------------------
Kenneth Seaman   12/21/99 01:02 PM

To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joanie H
Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Valero 8018 and 1394

It is my understanding the outages Valero incurred at the above locations are
force majure situations during December and should not trigger the buyback
feature of the contract.

Gary, I have not seen any documentation of this from Valero. Please follow up
with your counterpart to secure the letter of notice or we will need to
process the deal as if the buyback is active.

Thanks

Ken


The details for today's conference call are as follows:

1:30 CDT

Call in number 800 851 1766, participant code 685753

Rose is on vacation and Sheila will be calling in from Portland.  I have a
100 conference call, but I will step out if I can.

Talk to you soon!

Kay


Watch for her call.  Ask her to send me a resume to review and set up a
meeting when convenient.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/02/2001 09:48 AM
---------------------------

Paula Rieker@ENRON
02/01/2001 03:59 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Candidate

Sally - I had a chance to meet with Norma Tidrow today.  Norma is currently
the Corp. Secy. at Azurix.  I worked closely with her in the International
business and have a very high regard for her work.  Norma's background is as
a senior legal specialist.  She has advanced to a Director level at AZX.   I
believe she would be a very strong candidate for the right job within Enron.
She is a very quick learner, and her documentation and process-oriented
skills are exceptional.  Pls. expect a call from her to discuss
opportunities.  Thanks for your consideration!  Paula


Don't forget lunch today.

Reservations have been made at La Griglia Restaurant, 2002 W. Gray
(713-526-4700) for Noon.


SERC-   For Saturday we sold 200MW (HE15-19 for a 5 hour take) @ $80.00.
SCEG and DUKE were bidding in the mid 40's.  Due to TLR's power from the
North could not flow to SERC.  Off-peak bids for Saturday were in the low
teens.  SOCO was an $11 bid for off-peak.  Everyone else in SERC was flat or
a low teen bid.  For Sunday SOCO was a $26 bid during the afternoon peak.
SCEG was a $34 bid.  TLR's prevented any deals getting done with SCEG during
the afternoon.  DUKE, SCEG and SOSO will be on the bid for Monday.

FRCC-   For Saturday we sold power to Florida in the morning but were cut due
to TLR's starting HE11.  Bids in Florida got to as high as mid 60's.  FPL and
FPC were the one's bidding in the mid 60's.  TLR's were not lifted until H/E
1, for H/E 1 we sold FPL $22(100mw's) into JEA.  For Sunday FP&L and TALL
were both on the BID @ $26-35 Hourly in the morning and  BOD @ $ 55-65.00.
Sunday morning we began buying  power from CE  and selling it to FPL and
TALL.  TLR's were called startng H/E 11.  Florida was bidding in the mid 40's
for a 16-hour schedule for Monday.    Offpeak bids were in the mid teens for
both Saturday and Sunday night.

ERCOT-  For Saturday bids were in the low to mid 30's.  Offers were in the
high 40's(CSW and HLP) to mid 50's(TU).  We sold the City of GARLAND $54 for
he 23 and 24.  Their bid was high due to trans. contraints from the south to
north.  They had bought power from San Antonio and Reliant which ended up
being cut.  We ended up buying from CSW(wtu-$48) thinking this was north
enough.  The ISO killed the deal.  They told us that as of Friday WTU will
not be allowed to send out any power when south to north transmission is set
to -0-.  For Sunday bids were in the 30's again.  Reliant and TU told us they
will be bidding for HE 14-21.  We purchased trans. into ERCOT for these
hours.


Mark,

Do you know of any information/analysis we have collected on the Trent and
Desert Sky sites?  I know that we were collecting data from GA, but Matt was
handling most of this.

JD
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron on 07/08/2002 01:03
PM ---------------------------

Kurt Anderson
07/08/2002 09:54 AM
To: Bo Thisted/EWC/Enron@Enron, Jeff Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: 1.5 MW series turbines: lightning damage

Bo and Jeff Duff, please provide the info as requested by GH on behalf of AEP.

Thank you
---------------------- Forwarded by Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron on 07/08/2002
10:08 AM ---------------------------

simpson@garradhassan.co.uk on 07/07/2002 10:07:38 AM
To: kurt.anderson@ps.ge.com
cc: jfgodfrey@aep.com

Subject: 1.5 MW series turbines:  lightning damage

Kurt,

We are aware that some lightning damage has been caused in the past to
turbines at Desert Sky.  Could you please advise how many instances there
have been and the extent of damage.

Could you also please provide summary record of instances of lightning damage
sustained by the turbines across the 1.5 MW series fleet, with detail in the
case of Trent Mesa.

Thanks.

Regards,

Peter Simpson

Garrad Hassan & Partners Ltd.
One St. Francis Place, Suite 3907
San Francisco
CA 94107

tel. & fax: 415 348 1559    cell phone: 415 238 8437


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042421.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 21 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 21 / Preferred:   9.08 / Final:   8.49)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Lou, Alan, and Kay:

	Gerald Nemec suggested I notify you of Enron's desire to negotiate an early termination date with the subject counterparty.  The attached document describes the physical transaction.  Please let me know who can provide authority to proceed.

I will be happy to field your questions.  Also, if you need additional information do not hesitate to contact me.

Thank you.

Louis R. DiCarlo
ENA Gas Structuring
Phone: 713-345-4666
Email: louis.dicarlo@enron.com


Concur Expense (XMS) Upgrade!

On July 2, 2001, Enron,s Corporate Expense Management Solution will undergo
an upgrade to version 6.0.2.
The Integrated Solution Center (ISC) has developed a transition plan
containing several important deadlines affecting
all XMS users.

       Transition Schedule

Important Date #1 - Monday, June 18th
? American Express transactions will no longer be loaded into the current XMS
system starting June 18th.  Beginning June 18th, all AMEX transactions will
be loaded into the new Concur Expense (XMS) system.
?  Beginning June 18th, the ISC will be solely responsible for adding new
users to the current XMS system.  On July 2nd, new users created in SAP HR
will be  automatically loaded into the new Concur Expense (XMS) system.

Important Date #2 - Wednesday, June 27th
? This marks the deadline for entering new expense reports into the current
XMS system.  All open expense reports in XMS must be submitted and approved
by June 27th.  All users will be locked out of XMS after this date!!

Important Date #3 - Monday, July 2nd
? The new version of Concur Expense (XMS ver. 6.0.2) goes LIVE!!!

For a list of frequently asked questions (FAQ), please click on the following
link:  http://isc.enron.com/site/xmsfaqs.htm

If you have any other questions on any of the above items, please contact the
ISC Call Center at 713-345-4727.


FYI

We only have four "Top Tens" left after our meeting on Tuesday:

Aquila Canada Corp.  (BR)
Columbia Natural Resources, Inc.  (BR)
Gas Natural Mexico, S.A. de C.V.  (PR)
Sprague Energy Corp.  (RD)

Do you need legal to focus on others?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Matt Motley and Mike Swerzbin both said this trade should be desk-to-desk and
has nothing to do with Bonneville. Could you send me a copy of the confirm
letter? They'd like to look at it to try and figure out what trade BPA is
referring to. If it's a hard copy, you can fax it to 503-464-3740. Thanks a
lot.

Kate

	From:  Kimberly Allen                           01/04/2001 03:16 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #486435

Hey Kate! I have a trade that Motley did and it shows as a desk to desk
trade. But BPA sent me a confirmation on the trade. Is this suppose to be
desk to desk or should the counterparty actually be BPA?

Thanks,

Kimberly Indelicato


Carol,

- Do we really want to accept arbitration in Portland?
- What is our exposure to Federal Law?

Dave

   Carol St Clair @ ECT                05/11/2000 10:05 AM

To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Bonneville Power Administration

David:
Enclosed for your review is a draft amendment letter for the above
counterparty.  All of the requested chnages are driven by the fact that BPA
is a federal agency.  I look forward to hearing from you.
Carol


---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Benson/Corp/Enron on 05/11/2001
12:20 PM ---------------------------

Chris Dorland@ECT
05/11/2001 12:14 PM
To: Robert Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Why One Firm Thinks Enron Is Running Out of Gas

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 12:14
PM ---------------------------

	Dan Dorland
	05/11/2001 07:50 AM

To: Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, Jan Wilson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Jeff Borg/TOR/ECT@ECT,
Dave Ellis/TOR/ECT@ECT, Garrett Tripp/TOR/ECT@ECT, Stephane
Brodeur/CAL/ECT@ECT, Chris Dorland/HOU/ECT@ECT, kdorland@flint-energy.com
cc:
Subject: Why One Firm Thinks Enron Is Running Out of Gas

http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/comment/detox/1422781.html

Why One Firm Thinks Enron Is Running Out of Gas
By Peter Eavis
Senior Columnist
Originally posted at 5:23 PM ET 5/9/01 on RealMoney.com

A small research boutique with a reputation for rigorous analysis is telling
clients to quickly dump Enron (ENE:NYSE - news), believing that the energy
trading giant's 2001 earnings will fall well short of Wall Street's
forecasts.
Cambridge, Mass.-based Off Wall Street, led by analyst Mark Roberts, thinks
Enron's 2001 earnings will fall 6 cents short of the consensus estimate of
$1.79. The firm also believes Enron stock should trade around $30, nearly 50%
below Wednesday's $59.20.
The firm's 26-page report, published May 6, highlights Enron's declining
profitability and increasing leverage and suggests that the company should
trade on the same sort of multiple as a trading firm like Goldman Sachs (GS
:NYSE - news), which has a 2001 price-to-earnings ratio about half of Enron's
33 times. OWS also alleges that Enron's earnings quality is poor and that key
parts of its financial statements are confusing and opaque.
Houston-based Enron didn't comment by publication time on elements of the
report that Detox sent the company. An energy analyst who is bullish on
Enron's outlook says the OWS report contains fundamental misunderstandings
about the energy market and Enron's business model, but he says the report
does include some ground-breaking and valid insights. (The analyst's firm
doesn't give stock recommendations.)
Economies of Scale
Why care what Off Wall Street writes, compared with, say, analysts at Merrill
Lynch (MER:NYSE - news)? For one, OWS has an excellent track record.
Particularly sweet was 2000, when the tech stocks it had bashed came crashing
down. It has also shown itself to be well ahead of the curve, recommending
that clients sell e-tailer priceline.com (PCLN:Nasdaq - news) in June 1999,
when faith in Internet stocks was at its blindest and their prices at their
most insane.

Pulling Back
Enron retreats after long rally

Enron, with its domination of a burgeoning energy market, annual revenue of
over $100 billion and impressive earnings growth, can hardly be ranked
alongside the likes of priceline. But OWS thinks Enron is set for a
precipitous drop nonetheless. Why?
OWS's main beef is that key profitability measures are in decline. Margins on
Enron's pretax operating earnings (which the company's earnings releases call
IBIT, or income before interest, taxes and other items) are falling. Total
IBIT of $795 million in the first quarter amounted to only 1.59% of the $50
billion in revenue for the period, compared with a 2.08% margin in the fourth
quarter and 4.75% in the year-earlier period. Revenue in the first quarter
was nearly quadrupled from the year-earlier period, yet IBIT rose only 27%.
This shrinkage is due to lower-margin trading income making up an
increasingly large share of Enron's revenue base.
OWS thus calculates that for the remainder of 2001 Enron needs to generate an
extra $2.1 billion in revenue for each additional penny it makes over its
2000 EPS of $1.47 to reach analysts' expectation of $1.79.
The energy analyst counters that OWS apparently hasn't grasped how Enron can
continue to increase earnings even when margins shrink. It does so simply by
increasing volumes as the energy market balloons in size. In other words,
margins may decline, but since revenues are so much higher, earnings still go
up. Illustrating this, first-quarter 2001 EPS of 49 cents was 23% ahead of
the year-ago figure, even though the IBIT margin shrank by 3.2 percentage
points. The analyst thinks Enron will make $1.82 per share in 2001.
Growing On You
In addition, the huge growth in the energy market that has so helped Enron is
likely to continue for several years, according to the analyst. He notes that
roughly 75% of the electricity available in the U.S. still isn't traded in a
market. "Eventually it will be part of a competitive environment, but it'll
take five to 10 years," says the analyst. And he believes the extreme
volatility in energy-related commodities that has also benefited Enron will
exist for longer than OWS projects.
Still, OWS's point on profitability is bolstered by other profit measures.
Return on capital (net income as a percentage of equity plus debt) was 6.6%
in 2000, down on 1999's 6.9% and well below the 2000 returns on capital at
Duke (DUK:NYSE - news) (11.8%), Dynegy (DYN:NYSE - news) (12.1%) and even
Goldman (8.9%).
Even Enron bulls will admit that its financials are hard to follow. For
example, it doesn't give a gross margin number for its wholesale services, or
trading, business, which accounts for 96% of revenue. But one area of the
company's financial statements registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that consistently bugs analysts is the part that describes Enron's
related party transactions, which are the deals it does with entities that
have some sort of link to the firm. In fact, one of the related entities that
Enron has traded with is headed by Enron's CFO, Andrew Fastow. The energy
analyst comments: "Why are they doing this? It's just inappropriate."
The reason for maintaining these hard-to-follow related party deals has been
a source of speculation. But OWS analysis shows how a sales of optical fiber
to a related party may have been used to goose earnings in the second quarter
of 2000. Estimated profits from the so-called dark fiber (optical cable
without the gear to send data over it) transaction allowed Enron to beat
analysts' second-earnings earnings estimate by 2 cents a share, rather than
missing by 2 cents.
How soon before Wall Street follows Off Wall Street on Enron?


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude65.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas65.pdf

Distillate and unleaded charts to follow.

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG65.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG65.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL65.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Greetings:

Attached is the draft.  I've attempted to capture everyone's comments.  The
only piece that is not likely to go this evening is the piece providing
comments on the Governor's specific proposals.  That will likely go first
thing tomorrow morning.  You'll note that only one of the Governor's
proposals currently has any comments attached to it.  Comments on the
Governor's proposals are appreciated.  The remainder of the materials will go
to the Governor's staff later this evening; so any and all comments on those
portions are welcomed and appreciated.  Thanks to all for the assistance,
particularly in light of the holiday.

Best,
Jeff


Vince,

FYI.  This is something the team has been working on with Krishna.

Regards,
Sandeep.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
12/21/2000 04:03 AM ---------------------------

Sandeep Kohli
12/21/2000 04:00 PM
To: James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: LNG Hedging

Jim,

I am attaching below a small draft note prepared by Anshuman on LNG hedging.

It talks of two products:
(1) Volumetric Options (where we buy a call on 100% of the volumes and sell a
put on 50% of the volumes to finance the call), and
(2)  Ratio Derivative where we buy two calls at a higher price, and sell one
at a lower price to finance it.  This is not one that the traders agree to,
since at the upper price, the calls bought are just at the money, while the
sold call is in the money, and will cost the seller.

Hence, only Option 1 is useful.  It could provide risk mitigation in the high
price scenario, while allowing some participation in low prices.  To test it,
we used March 2001 period.  To have it cost neutral, we would buy a call at
$26, and sell the put at $25.15.

As we bounce these ideas, I think it is very important that we work closely
with the Global Markets group.  The team on the ground knows the contracts
better, and maybe able to give you insights on what can be sold to MSEB.

Would love to discuss the same with you.

Regards,
Sandeep.


I have a meeting at 1:15, I assume in my office, with some Houston folks.
The topic a potential purchase of
Westcoast.  I would like both of you to attend.


Hey Greg.  I see no objection to amending the ISDA to cover power
transactions.  Also,  potential credit exposure related to a prompt month
power trade should be modest.  You may want to ensure that Tracy has no
objection, but this transaction should be fine.

Rod

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Wolfe, Greg
Sent: 25 May 2001 15:51
To: Nelson, Roderick
Cc: St Clair, Carol; Ngo, Tracy
Subject: RE: Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation - UK and US swaps

Rod:

We are looking at doing a June physical index power purchase today with
Kaiser. however, Kaiser only wants to proceed if we can assure them that we
can add electricity to the existing ISDA between Enron and Kaiser such that
they could fix the price during the month of June. After reading your comment
below about netting it appears that a longer term transaction would not be
advisable until further legal clarification occurs. Is there any reason we
can't or shouldn't pursue adding electricity to the ISDA provided we only do
one month transactions (assuming we see no risk of near term bankrupcty)?
Please advise immediately.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nelson, Roderick
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 2:53 AM
To: Ngo, Tracy
Cc: St Clair, Carol; Shackleton, Sara; Pitt, Michael; Boyd, Justin; Evans,
Mark; Wolfe, Greg
Subject: RE: Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation - UK and US swaps

Tracy,

Did you have a chance to read my email response earlier this week?  I believe
that it is highly unlikely that we will be able to net exposures across
non-defaulting (Enron) entities.  Paul Simons can (and maybe has by now)
given opinion to this idea.  Historically, I believe the opinion has long
been that such netting (set-off against affiliates of non-defaulting party)
in the US should work within the case of contractual default, but outside of
bankruptcy.  However, in the special case of legal bankruptcy, such netting
(though contractually agreed by the parties) may be challenged.  Introducing
the fact that one of Enron's entities is a UK entity may further cloud the
likelihood.  Clearly, if the relationship involves more than on Kaiser
entity, netting almost certainly will not work.

Has Diana not responded to your credit exposure questions regarding the form
of governing confirmation and legal entity?  I believe that she is in the US,
but should be checking in.  Perhaps you should try calling her?  I think we
will find that the transacting entity is a subsidiary of Kaiser Aluminum.

Risk management systems for metals are still not ideal.  Volumetric/CVAR type
analysis may not yield such reliable results.

Rod

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Ngo, Tracy
Sent: 24 May 2001 22:15
To: Nelson, Roderick
Cc: St Clair, Carol; Shackleton, Sara; Pitt, Michael; Boyd, Justin; Evans,
Mark; Wolfe, Greg
Subject: Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation - UK and US swaps
Importance: High

Rod,

Enron North America is looking to enter into power swaps with Kaiser Aluminum
& Chemical Corporation starting June 2001.  I'm seeing in the credit system
that MG plc has forward financial metals positions with Kaiser, however I
need clarification on whether the swaps are done with Kaiser Aluminum &
Chemical Corporation or Kaiser Aluminum International Inc.  Secondly, is
there a Master ISDA Agreement governing those swaps?  In pulling the mtm
monthly breakout, it appears that MG plc is OTM north of $10MM US and the
liquidation of that portfolio occurs mostly in cal '02.

Given Kaiser's limited credit line, I'd like to look into the potential of
setting off financial exposures in the UK and US in cases of default.  Kaiser
is looking at other businesses with Enron and this could be quite fruitful to
tap into in order to increase trading liquidity going forward.

In summary, we need to answer at minimum the following:
? confirmation of which Kaiser entity is financial transacting with MG plc
? volatility of the metal positions that go out to Jan '04 to ensure how
quickly this out-of-the-money position can move
? what type of paper is confirming the swaps (whether long-form confirms or
Master ISDA)
? what credit/legal terms and laws may affect our efforts to establish a
Netting Agreement for UK and US financial

Can you help me in coordinating a meeting with London legal/credit and
Portland credit/Houston legal to discuss pertinent issues associated with a
Netting Agreement between Kaiser (single entity or multiple entities) and
Enron entities (MG plc and ENA) as soon as possible.  Please let me know your
thoughts to the above and who we need to contact to get the above points
addressed.  In Houston legal, Carol St. Clair is available to work on the
drafting of such a Netting Agreement and is speaking with Sara Shackleton
about the concept as well.

Please let me know as soon as possible your comments to the above and in
setting up a conference call to push this forward.

Thanks,
Tracy


Montreal, November 20, 2000

RE:  North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation Electricity
Advisory Board - Message from Chair

Dear Colleagues,

I wanted to take this opportunity to update you on a few important planning
and communication matters regarding your participation on the North American
Commission for Environmental Cooperation's (NACEC) Electricity Advisory Board
and to provide you with the date for the upcoming meeting. It will take place
the 16th of January at the Commission's offices in Montreal.

In August, I had the opportunity to visit the NACEC's Montreal headquarters
to discuss a number of the key issues to be addressed by the electricity
restructuring expert report and to get a better feel for the nature of the
guidance and input the Advisory Board can contribute to this initiative.
More than ever, I am convinced that the outstanding group of individuals
serving on the Advisory Board can play an important role in defining and
deepening our understanding of the key trade and environment issues at play
on a continental scale.

The Secretariat has made considerable progress in conducting a thorough
scoping analysis, compiling a searchable database of renewable energy
definitions and portfolio standards and initiating work in the area of market
access and trade disciplines.  At this early stage of development of the
expert report, I believe it is an ideal time to schedule our first meeting of
the Advisory Board to familiarize ourselves with major issues and provide
advice on the scope and content of the report, as well as the broader
initiative.

The Secretariat has been in contact with you in advance to select a date for
our first meeting so that the greatest number of Board members can
participate. Accordingly, we will hold a one-day meeting in Montreal on
Tuesday, the 16th of January 2001. The NACEC will cover all travel expenses
along with accommodations and per diem. The Meeting Coordinator at the NACEC,
Leticia Villeneuve, will be in touch to assist you in making your travel
arrangements. If you wish you may contact her at 514-350-4313. Those Board
members that cannot attend will be able to join portions of the meeting by
conference call.

I have included a draft agenda for your review along with the list of current
members of the Advisory Board.  The Secretariat will soon establish a web
site and list serve to facilitate our communications, including the exchange
and review of documents. The Secretariat will also prepare, in advance of our
first meeting, a brief but detailed report outline, including the major
themes that are being considered for the report.  The Secretariat is seeking
our views on the key issues that warrant special analysis.

I very much look forward to meeting you soon in Montreal.  As always, feel
free to contact me if you would like to talk over any aspect of our work
together. Or, if you have any questions regarding the logistics of the
meeting, please contact Alicia Chica at the Secretariat at 514-350-4330, or
by e-mail at achica@ccemtl.org .

Sincerely,

Philip Sharp
Chair
 North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation Electricity Advisory
Board

 - AGENDA.DOC


Enron has sold Houston Pipeline Company.  Read about it in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
Find out who else from Enron is part of the Bush transition team
Read how Jeff would solve the problems in California
Enron helps draft a new master bandwidth trading agreement
Awards, awards...and more awards

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz January 19, 2001."


I want to make sure Joni sees everyting on CGAS as well.

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/16/2000 08:39:28 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, "        -         *Goodell, Scott"
<BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>
cc: "        -         *Kinney, Doug" <BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: New SST Volumes for COH

Just a note that as of 4/1/00, CES' SST capacity on TCO will decrease. We have
submitted a request to COH for Storage Capacity and Transport (FSS & SST) for
the 00-01 season. COH should have the actual numbers late Friday, but I have
made a guesstimate below. You only get 50% of your Oct-Mar WD capacity for
Apr-Sep Inj, which could be around 50,000 dth/d. The numbers below are from
3/00, so 4/00 should be smaller, but I will forward to you as soon as I can.


When: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 1:00 PM-4:00 PM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US &
Canada); Tijuana.
Where: Enron Energy Services - San Ramon, CA

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

This meeting is to discuss the scope and costs associated with the PG&E
Detailed Study for the Project.


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000 01:13 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	09/01/2000 11:07 AM

		 To: rstribling@tristategt.orgj, bates@tristategt.org, kgreen@tristategt.org
		 cc: Mark Courtney, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Attached is a clean and redlined version of the Confidentiality Agreement
with our revisions.


- Gerald
Note Dominion's legal name - it was different on the previous email.

Tyrell Harrison
303 575 6478


Jon, here's some backup info from NatSource brokers.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Anne-Marie Miser [mailto:AMiser@natsource.com]
> Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 2:13 PM
> To:	Adriana (E-mail); Anthonygar (E-mail); Bethhull (E-mail); Bogden
> (E-mail); Broyles (E-mail); Chrisk (E-mail); Clark (E-mail); Clemons
> (E-mail); Coco (E-mail); Conedrisk (E-mail); Corrs (E-mail); Craigprovo
> (E-mail); Cynthia (E-mail); Dahlem (E-mail); Diana (E-mail); Donna
> (E-mail); Ellien (E-mail); Frenza (E-mail); Futchdog (E-mail); Gallosan
> (E-mail); Gobm (E-mail); Guy (E-mail); Heike (E-mail); Herb (E-mail);
> Hunter (E-mail); Janine (E-mail); Jeffpepco (E-mail); Jendras (E-mail);
> Johned (E-mail); Josh (E-mail); Junek (E-mail); Katie (E-mail); Kenz
> (E-mail); Kerry (E-mail); Larry (E-mail); Lawson (E-mail); Layne (E-mail);
> Lori (E-mail); Marissa (E-mail); Neut (E-mail); Otterstadt (E-mail);
> Pisula (E-mail); Puig (E-mail); Ravi (E-mail); Riskmanagement (E-mail);
> Rita (E-mail); Rivera (E-mail); Rose (E-mail); Schaffer (E-mail); Scottall
> (E-mail); Scottp (E-mail); Stephanie (E-mail); Sturm (E-mail); Terence
> (E-mail); Theman (E-mail); Woodward (E-mail)
> Subject:	Price Updates
>
>  <<NE_Prices_113001.xls>>

 - NE_Prices_113001.xls


The August issue of Gas Flows looks at the short term natural gas prices and forecasted demand.

Rita Hartfield
Phone:  713-853-5854
Fax:  713-646-4702
Cell:  713-504-5428
Rita.Hartfield@enron.com


BLOOMBERG
577573 - changed to Aquila
577533 - added .005 broker fee

AMEREX
577873 - LTNW sells EES/Cal'07-Cal'10/Off Peak/$44.50

PREBON
577849 - Jeff Richter buys BP (changed broker to Prebon)

AMEREX
I see several sales to Puget in Diana's blotter at a $375 price, only one
with Amerex, and it's for 50 MW. I'll need to get ahold of her in the morning
to verify the brokers on these. I'll let you know as soon as I do.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/10/2001 03:15 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 4/10 checkout con't

PREBON WEST

Jeff Richter
I am missing this deal:
Enron buys BP Energy Q4 SP-15 $205.00

AMEREX WEST

Dianna Scholtes
Amerex is showing the following deals on their checkout that I did not verbal:

1) Enron sells to Puget 4/11 25 mw of Mid-C at $375
2) Enron sells to Puget 4/11 25 mw of Mid-C at $375

Mike Swerzbin
Amerex  is showing the following deals on their checkout that I did not
verbal:
1) Enron sells to EES 25 mw of Cal'07- Cal'10 off-peak Cobb at $44.50 fee of
.0075

BLOOMBERG

Mike Swerzbin
deal 577573
Bloomberg shows the cp as Aquila and enpower has Idaho Power

Matt Motley
deal 577533
Bloomberg show fee of $.005


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2000
12:23 PM ---------------------------

Bob Withers <rww@KCSEnergy.com> on 02/25/2000 12:08:09 PM
To: Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stretch Brennan <djb@KCSEnergy.com>, Knox Westmoreland
<rkw@KCSEnergy.com>, Kevin McLarney <kmm@KCSEnergy.com>, Vance L
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Josey Ranch Est. -- Mar. 2000

 This is the estimated Josey Ranch nomination for the month of March
2000.  The HPL nomination volume to be effective 3/1/2000 is:

    12,500 MMBtu/day for KCS Resources
    12,500 MMBtu/day Total (assumed Btu factor of 1.075
@ 14.65 dry)

If you need additional information, KCS' field contact is Stretch Brennan in
Victoria: 512 / 576 - 1005.

Bob Withers <*))>><
KCS Energy, 5555 San Felipe, Suite 1200
Houston, TX  77056
voice mail/page 713-964-9434


Given the current tremendous energy market volatility and as we stretch
resources to make our commercial goals for 2000, we think it would be
appropriate to postpone the ENA 2000 Offsite to early next year.  I trust
this meets with your approval and thanks for all the hard work.

Regards
Dave and John


Rita, Please help me with this. I have some questions regarding Enerfin.
Why are we re-allocating prior month volumes at Enerfin after we matched your
original numbers back in October? Can't this be fixed in the actualization
process?
The numbers for October between ENA-TETCO and HPL vary a good bit.  Are we
your only customer at that point and why do we show volumes on days ENA had
no transactions with HPL?  Can we simply put zero paths in UNIFY and extend
our existing deals in Sitara with zero volumes and have you guys actualize
these small volumes to handle this?  We go round and round at this point
changing volumes two, three or more times. Call me if you have questions..
Thanks Victor
---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000
08:50 AM ---------------------------
From: Meredith Mitchell on 12/14/2000 09:28 AM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: HPL discrepancy

Victor,

The sitara ticket that we were using for the month of October is #421415.
TETCO shows that the volumes that HPL was allocated on October 6th and
October 19th, were 9 dths and 44 dths, respectively.  Those volumes were
pulled off of our backhaul contract because there was no nomination in
place.  This is the same problem that we have had over and over with them.
Also, we just found out on Tuesday, that the OBA did not go into effect until
December 1, 2000.  We were originally told that they were putting the OBA in
effect retroactively to November of 1999.  In fact, I thought that HPL had
made a lot of retroactive changes in the system to adjust for the OBA, do you
remember that?  HPL told us that Ray Calles at TETCO is the one who decided
that the OBA would not be effective until December of 2000.  Nobody even
informed us of this change, I stumbled upon it when researching a November
issue for Alfonso Trabulsi and Brenda Fletcher.  In addition to all of this,
I received another email, which I will copy below, asking me to go in for the
month of October and adjust all of my estimated volumes in Unify to match
what HPL shows that we were allocated.  I had been going in all month long
and matching to their numbers, and we were clean for the deadline at the end
of the month.  I ran the allocation report from TETCO for the month of
October, and some of HPL's numbers were very different from TETCO's,
including the two days that I mentioned above.  I sent Jackie Young an email
back showing her TETCO's numbers and I haven't received a response.  I will
copy that email below as well, just to catch you up on what's been going on.

Jackie Young
12/12/2000 10:01 AM
To: Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Estimated Volumes for meter 98-0439 for (10/2000)

Cynthia/Meredith:

Please find below the estimates for the above referenced meter for 10/2000.
Once you're done placing these estimates on TETCO's side, can you please
apprise me so that volume mgt. can conclude their business?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497

DAY	VOLUMES
1	39647
2	40040
3	39643
4	39809
5	39702
6	18 dec. (str. gas)
7
8
9
10
11	29162
12	14689
13	40400
14	30599
15	30523
16	30394
17	30369
18	40547
19	88 dec. (str. gas)
20	10126
21	20167
22	20208
23	20502
24	40408
25	45721
26	30978
27	43142
28	9667
29	9536
30	10290
31

	From:  Meredith Mitchell                           12/12/2000 11:37 AM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: October Volumes

Hi Jackie,

I ran a report from TETCO's system to show the volumes that Enron was
allocated for the month of October, and some of the volumes are very
different from the volumes that you show.  I copied your numbers below and
copied TETCO's volumes below that (with the disrepancies in red).  I was
wondering if you could double check the 3rd, 4th, 11th, 12th, 25th, and 27th
to see if you had purchases on those days from a counterparty other than
Enron North America at that meter.  It looks like maybe the volumes that you
show are the total flow at that meter, but I think that only part of the gas
was actually allocated to us.  I don't mind putting the allocated volumes in
path manager, but I'd like to make sure that on the above days, I am only
putting in the amount that Enron was allocated.

Also, on the 6th and the 19th TETCO shows exactly half of what you show,
which I thought was kind of strange.  I am going to have to get TETCO's
permission to do a retroactive nomination for those two days at the volumes
you have requested, before I can put anything in Sitara or Unify.  My manager
is out of the office and will be back tomorrow, but I would like for him to
double check the deal that we will have to create in Sitara for those two
days, since we are dealing with a prior month issue.

DAY	VOLUMES
1	39647
2	40040
3	39643
4	39809
5	39702
6	18 dec. (str. gas)
7
8
9
10
11	29162
12	14689
13	40400
14	30599
15	30523
16	30394
17	30369
18	40547
19	88 dec. (str. gas)
20	10126
21	20167
22	20208
23	20502
24	40408
25	45721
26	30978
27	43142
28	9667
29	9536
30	10290
31

DAY	VOLUMES
1	39647
2	40040
3	29732
4	24881
5	39702
6	9 dec. (str. gas)
7
8
9
10
11	19441
12	9793
13	40400
14	30599
15	30523
16	30394
17	30369
18	40547
19	44 dec. (str. gas)
20	10126
21	20167
22	20208
23	20502
24	40408
25	25401
26	30978
27	30099
28	9667
29	9536
30	10290
31


Misplaced the cover sheet but they basically said that the baseload deal fell
under an interruptilbe contract and was not subject ot damanges.  Laurie
Ellis has a copy.


Please complete Hayden's form for your respective regions.

Keep in mind that this could act as potential position limit set forth by UBS so be careful in completing this form.   In addition, UBS has a liquidity reserve used to adjust curves when marking P&L.    The "liquidity reserve" accounts for the fact you can't liquidate at the mid and with big positions you probably can't even liquidate at the bid (offer).

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:18 PM
To:	Belden, Tim; Presto, Kevin M.; Zufferli, John; Lavorato, John
Cc:	Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Kathy
Subject:	UBS Trade Products

My apologies if this has been done, but I'm in process of assembling list of products that UBS will be trading.  If this list has been compiled, please direct it to me.

I'm interested in getting the greatest granularity possible breaking it out by VaR portfolio name, trader, trading book, commodity, instrument, location, tenor, relative liquidity for each instrument expressed in contract/day (i.e. could impact holding period for VAR) and best risk mitigator.  (Regarding best risk mitigator, I'm not looking for liquidating position comments, but rather best hedge given curve location.)  This will help in directing correlation efforts for VAR.  See attached spreadsheet for suggested format.

Thanks,
Frank


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	ESA Presentation (HAVE TO ATTEND) 4102

Date:		7/21/2000
Time:		9:30 AM - 12:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


SALES AGT: MP/YEO5IM

                                          WARD/KIM
                                          ENRON NORTH AMERICA
                                          3WTC 0306
  ENRON CORP

  DATE:  DEC 19 2000

CAR                   19DEC NATIONAL               HOUSTON TX
                      22DEC CONFIRMATION: 809541373COUNT
                            TELEPHONE: (281) 443-8850
                            FAX: (281) 821-6944
                            INTERMED CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD40.25DY-UNL MI
                            RATE QUOTED DROP CHARGE: USD0.00
.00
                            BASE RATE: *ZL*USD120.75 BR-3DY
                            PICK-UP: HOUSTON INTERCONTINENTAL ARPT,
                            HOUSTON
                            DROP-OFF: HOBBY AIRPORT

WARD/KIM  S5C0413R1059

ASSISTANT: DANA CAMPBELL 503 464-3901
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRONASSIS ANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 ( OLLECT)
*********************************************


Media Inquiries: Angela Mendoza
                 (713) 215-4098
Other Inquiries: Weekend Scheduling Analyst Listed BelowMay 17, 2001

To:    Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Customers and Shippers

Re:    Customer Services and Scheduling
       Weekend Duty Schedule for May 19 & 20, 2001

Listed below are the persons who are scheduled for duty this weekend. If
you are calling long distance, please use our 800 number, 1-800-248-0404,
followed by the extension number (last four digits of the office phone
number) of the person you are trying to reach. If you are calling locally,
you may dial the office phone number directly.

Department           Pager         Name                     Office Phone

Transit
                     888-756-4058  Cathy Buhrke            713-215-3371

Customer Services,
Transp. Contracting  713-994-3014  Russell Rush            713-215-2420

Scheduling
                     888-659-8714  Cassandra Combre        713-215-2981
                     888-674-0736  Esther Ramos            713-215-4045
                     888-974-9261  Beverly Beaty           713-215-2915
                     888-659-5172  Mable King              713-215-4606

Larry G. Cunningham
Manager, Scheduling

--------------------------ADDITIONAL X12 INFORMATION------------------------
Trans. Svc. Provider: 007933021 - TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION
   Notice Identifier: L0105171
     Critical Notice: No
      Type of Notice: 7-Press Release, Company News or Phone List
   Required Response: 5-No Response Required
   Resp By Date/Time: N/A
Notice Eff Date/Time: 05/17/01 07:48:09
Notice End Date/Time: N/A
              Status: 1-Initiate
 Prior Notice Ident.: N/A
____________________________________________________________________________

 - C.DTF


---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Homco/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 11:03 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Corry Bentley                           11/28/2000 11:02 AM

To: Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW:

> (See attached file: democrat.bmp) <<democrat.bmp>>

 - democrat.bmp


Dawne,

The options should go to NG-PR-OPT, but the underlying swap should continue
be between NG-Price and NG-Exotic.

Thanks,

Errol

Dawn C Kenne@ECT
02/26/2001 11:50 AM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Mike Maggi Options

With this new book, you want the option to go to NG-PR-OPT (it is going to
NG-PRICE now) and the underlying swap to be between NG-PRICE and NG-PR-OPT?

Please confirm!

Dawn

---------------------- Forwarded by Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 11:48
AM ---------------------------

Tara Sweitzer
02/26/2001 09:28 AM
To: Dawn C Kenne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Mike Maggi Options

---------------------- Forwarded by Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 07:39
AM ---------------------------

Errol McLaughlin@ENRON
02/26/2001 09:23 AM
To: tara.sweitzer@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Mike Maggi Options

Sorry, I should have copied you on this.

Errol
---------------------- Forwarded by Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron on 02/26/2001
09:17 AM ---------------------------

Errol McLaughlin
02/26/2001 09:19 AM
To: dawne.c.kenne@enron.com, torrey.moorer@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Mike Maggi Options

Dawne,

Starting tommorrow, Mike's options need to be booked to NG-PR-OPT.  The deals
that are done online today will be manually switched to the new book by us.

Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin


give me a call

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Landry, Chad
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 2:05 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE: Lousyanna State vs. Texas - Pretenders vs. Contenders

anybody saying anything about the stock price.  rumors are coming out about us getting bought out by shell or a large private equity shop.

CKL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 1:58 PM
To:	'brian.r.vassigh@accenture.com'; Val.Generes@accenture.com; Landry, Chad; matthew.j.garver@accenture.com; elliot.j.green@accenture.com; kevin.labban@accenture.com
Subject:	RE: Lousyanna State vs. Texas - Pretenders vs. Contenders

famous vassigh quotes:

"pass the butter"
"you gonna finish that?"
"if loving this cake is wrong, i don't want to be right"
"i can eat twice as much of this ice cream b/c it is fat free"
"food in lousyana is overrated.  texas food rules"
"texas biscuts rule the world"
"i like my cookies texas size"
"don't mess with texas banana splits"

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	brian.r.vassigh@accenture.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of brian.r.vassigh@accenture.com
Sent:	Sunday, October 28, 2001 7:56 PM
To:	Val.Generes@accenture.com; Lenhart, Matthew; Landry, Chad; matthew.j.garver@accenture.com; elliot.j.green@accenture.com; kevin.labban@accenture.com
Subject:	Lousyanna State vs. Texas - Pretenders vs. Contenders

Well, Well, Well,
I am writing this note to all the smack talking coonass LSU fans who enjoy
banging on The University of Texas Longhorns with smug smack like
"Overrated, Overrated".
I usually use the BCC field when sending smack notes like this so everybody
won't get barraged with weak Reply All's from recipients who think they can
go toe to toe with me in e-mail smack (i.e. Val and his weak shit he likes
to send).
This time is different because I think y'all should know who your fellow
pathetic smack talking LSU fans are.
Y'all can start a new support group - called "Vassigh's College Football
Smacked down Bitches - that got their cakeholes shut by Chris Simms, Cedric
Benson, and Roy Williams et al"
Y'all have dished it all out, so I do not feel bad for rubbing salt into
the fatal wound that Ole Miss delivered you and your team Saturday night.

Here a couple of smack statements made by some if not all of the cajun's
included in this e-mail header.
   "Simms sucks, how could he be a preseason heisman candidate?" - Over his
   last three games, Simms is 59-of-88 (67.0 percent) for 698 yards and 12
   touchdowns passing 2 touchdowns rushing with just one interception
   (176.41 rating).  He has just started about ONE full seasons worth of
   games recently and is coming into his own.  Simms will be a top NFL pick
   as will Roy Williams and Cedric Benson.  I can't think of any College
   Football team in history with the high caliber triple threat that UT has
   with Simms, Benson, and Williams.
   "The SEC is the best conference in football, the Big XII Sucks" - What a
   joke that statement is.
   "LSU would whip UT"  - Yeah right - LSU Could not beat Rice.
   "UT is the most overrated team in college football" - interesting since
   they are higher ranked now in November than they were in the preseason
   polls.
   "Mack Brown can only recruit - he can't coach worth a damn - Nick Saban
   is better" - Mack Brown has one loss - he hasn't lost in Austin since he
   has been coach - while Saban has led LSU to three losses - 2 in the Red
   Stick - just THIS SEASON.

Every college football analyst would agree no conference compares to the
Big XII.
The BIG XII have 3 TEAMS RANKED IN THE TOP 5 early November - unbelievable!
Two of the top ranked BIG XII team's only losses were to the other top
ranked BIG XII school.  UT loss to OU and OU loss to Nebraska.
The only way the best teams in the Big XII lose is when they have to play
against each other.
The highest ranked SEC team (Florida) lost to Auburn which lost to pathetic
Arkansas.

All football players worth a damn have left y'alls God Forsaken state.
Peyton to Tennessee, Marshall Faulk to SDSU, the newest Manning to Ole Miss
that just whipped up on y'alls 3rd world state university in the Red Stick
on national television on a cool October Saturday night.
Cajuns like Jake Delhomme and Bobby Bouchieaux stay in Lousyanna to play
college ball though - that's some encouraging news for y'all.
I can't think of one LSU player that has ever done shit in the NFL.
NFL teams have gotten screwed every time they drafted a Lousyanna State
football player.
David Lafleur, Kevin Faulk, Harvey Williams, Eddie Kennison - the list goes
on and on.  It is really pathetic.
Texas has just RECENTLY produced dominating hausses like Ricky, Tony
Brackens, Dan Neil, Shaun Rogers, Leonard Davis, Priest Holmes, Blake
Brockermeyer, Bryant Westbrook, and many others.  Look at Eric Metcalf in
his first game back to the NFL for the Redskins - breaking NFL records.
Texas players are magic baby.
Not to mention legends like the Tyler Rose, Tom Landry, Bobby Layne, and
Tommy Nobis

I hope y'all enjoy Shreveport on a cold December night while y'all attend
Lousyanna States bowl game against Fresno State at the Independence bowl.
At least you can enjoy the New Years holiday by watching the NFL like
offense of The University of Texas Longhorns play in a BCS bowl and God
willing with some magic from TAMU over the Texas Traitor filled roster of
OU and some other help - watch UT vs. Miami in the Rose Bowl.

I guess that smack from Elliot saying Rohan was better than Simms seems
pretty foolish to you now doesn't it.
That dude needs to play linebacker if he wants to get in the NFL.  He might
have a decent arm but he has no clue in the pocket,  The difference between
how Eli Manning ran the passing game and Rohan did for LSU Saturday night
showed LSU's deficiency at the QB position.  Fumbling, bumbling, stumbling
is the best way to describe his play.

CKL - you better buy your family Christmas gifts from the dollar store
because you need to save your money to pay on the $500 bet you made with me
the night of Val's wedding in that little bar in Natchez, Mississippi.  You
boldly put your soon departed money where your mouth was all night, since
all you were ranting was "tiger bait, tiger bait" any time I was trying to
tell you how UT would whip up on LSU like the 3 lesser ranked teams have
already done this season.
The bet for $500 was to go to the person whose team would be ranked higher
at the end of the 2001 College Football season: Me = University of Texas
You =  LSU.
Well since UT is in the top 5 and with a worst case scenario would not
finish out of the top 15 this year and the fact that LSU will not even
finish the season ranked - you need to start saving your extra pocket cash
- or we can work out an installment plan.
Lenhart was a witness as well was another of Val's amigos (I forgot the
name but know the face).

It looks like history will keep on repeating itself with the Great State of
Texas always being superior in every facet over it's little cajun neighbor
to the east - Lousyanna.
Texas has the winningest NFL team of all time in the Dallas Cowboys, the 3
time champions and top 4 ranked Texas Longhorns.
Conversely Lousyanna has the losingest NFL team of all time in the Aints,
and the doormat of the pathetic SEC west Lousyanna State university.
The last Governor of Texas is the President of the United States and leader
of the free world.
The last Governor of Lousyanna is in prison licking Boudreaux's balls for
the next 15 years or so.
And the bottom line is that y'all are in my State working because there are
no jobs outside of casinos and bars in Lousyanna

Even the only bright spots in the pathetic history of y'alls only
professional sports franchise is provided by Texas players - Earl Campbell
and Ricky Williams.

He who laughs last laughs best.
Man this note is a classic.  I think I will be sending it to Jim Rome.

Hook 'Em

Val forward this note all over the Red Stick and all over that God Forsaken
land east of the Sabine.
The Truth shall set your people free.

Brian

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


GREAT THANKS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wright, Alice
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 10:03 AM
To:	Haedicke, Mark E.; Elbertson, Janette
Cc:	Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	Elizabeth Sager - Vacation
Importance:	High

Good morning Mark and Janette,

Elizabeth Sager will be out of the office on vacation July 23 - July 27.       She will be staying with her in-laws and listed below is her contact information.

Ronnie and Glenn Cox
281 Lemond
Snow Mass Village, CO 81615
970-923-6279
713-854-5747 (cell)

Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions.    Thanks.

Alice Wright
Enron Wholesale Services
Assistant to Elizabeth Sager
713-853-5438
713-646-3491 (fax)
alice.wright@enron.com


Sorry Beatrice,

I sent this to Greg and forgot to send it to you as well.  This is a
preliminary file until I have the official NGI settle prices for Chicago City
Gate and Socal.  Let me know it you have any questions.

Susan

Beatrice Reyna@ENRON
12/04/2000 04:39 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Nat Gas Basis Options

Hi Susan,

Would you please forward the current spreadsheet with exotics?

Thanks,
Beatrice


- KO - Full Balance Sheet Data.doc
 - KO Balance Sheet Data.doc
 - KO Financials.xls
 - KO Per Share Data.doc
 - OAT Financials.xls


try to find out where club monkey is going sat and we will front run them to
the bar.


-----Original Message-----
From: Armstrong, Kristy
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Hendon, Brian
Subject: FW: Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It

-----Original Message-----
From: Roberts, Chaun
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:48 AM
To: Armstrong, Kristy
Subject: FW: Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It

<http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1136446054>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kolle, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Clark, Catherine; Edmonds, Marcus; Liu, Ying; Ghosh, Soma; Herron, Chris; Bills, Lisa; Galan, Joseph M.; Proffitt, Tim
Subject: FW: Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It

Enron Article from this month's Texas Monthly...
-----Original Message-----
From: Rios, Amy
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:20 PM
To: Kolle, Brian
Subject: FW: Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It

Don't know if you were able to get this, but here it is anyway.

If it doesn't let you click on it, copy the url.

[IMAGE]Texas Monthly November 2001: How Enron Blew It <<http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1136446054>>

FORWARD THIS link <<http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=forward&etMailToID=1136446054&partnerID=989>>

[IMAGE] <<http://texasmonthly.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=browserButtons>>

[IMAGE]


I agree that we need a "standard" way of moving the turbines (and
transformers) into other structures.  Both the GE contract for the LM 6000's
and the ABB transformer contract envision such moves.  In addition, the ADA's
with WestLB anticipate these moves.  I'm sure you've heard plenty about all
of this.

I've been working on developing on some of the forms required to take some of
this - Global Finance will coordinate other aspects of it.  I believe we are
in pretty good shape conceptually to take care of all of it, but we should
plan 2 to 4 weeks to get the documents completed.

I don't see any problem with this - I just wanted you to be aware of some of
the logistics.  I'll be in the office tomorrow if you would like to discuss
this.

Kay

Karen E Carter
08/08/2000 01:53 PM
To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce
Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Matthew F
Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Matthew Berry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne
Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey
Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Austin turbines - transfer from West LB facility

It would appear that a number of people have been asked to look into the
process of purchasing and transferring the four Austin turbines from the West
LB facility.  As a number of issues need to be addressed and resolved prior
to being able to execute this transfer, it has been suggested that a general
meeting be set up to discuss and outline these issues.  Additionally, it
might be appropriate to appoint one individual to spearhead this general
effort to avoid duplicating efforts in the future.

Please indicate whether tomorrow at 3PM would fit your schedule, or suggest
an alternate time/date.  As it is seemingly difficult to schedule a
conference room on the 29th floor without ample advance notice, your response
would be very helpful.  Thanks.


Dee:   I'm in the midst of a closing; can you email language to me?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
12:28 PM ---------------------------

Carlos Giron <cgiron@mindspring.com> on 03/14/2001 04:43:23 PM
To: Glenn Bohan <gbohan@home.com>, Darron C Giron <dgiron@enron.com>, Brian
Subieville <BSubie@aol.com>, Lola Savannah <lola@pdq.net>, Michael Massimi
<massimi@hotmail.com>
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: Fw: NIke iD shoes]

Return-Path: <grant.w@mindspring.com>
Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.243]) by
walker.mail.mindspring.net (Earthlink Mail Service) with ESMTP id
tavp3f.39ar.37kbi73 for <cgiron@mindspring.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:36:47
-0500 (EST)
Received: from b6jqv (pool-63.52.61.92.atln.grid.net [63.52.61.92]) by
maynard.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA12331 for
<cgiron@mindspring.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:36:36 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <004801c0acdf$d9f0df20$5c3d343f@b6jqv>
From: "grant whipple" <grant.w@mindspring.com>
To: "Carlos Giron" <cgiron@mindspring.com>
Subject: Fw: NIke iD shoes
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:37:58 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0044_01C0AC9C.BEE79EA0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

?
----- Original Message -----
From: Barnett, Linda
To: Becky Runge (E-mail) ; Buckli Stanga  (E-mail) ; Chris  White (E-mail) ;
Eddie Barnette (E-mail) ; Eddie Whipple  (E-mail) ; Grant Whipple (E-mail) ;
Gseaman590308010 (E-mail) ; Hutchison,  Karen ; Ric  Mora (E-mail) ; Virgil_
Barbara and Family (E-mail) ; Seaman, Gary  C.
Cc: Hatch, Mary C. ; Ribera, Cindi  L.
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 8:39 AM
Subject: FW: NIke iD shoes

-----Original Message-----
From:  Humphrey, Autumn B.
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 5:52  PM
To: Greg Wines; Barnett, Linda; Carpenter, Tanya K.;  McKay, Scott A.
Cc: jjjk@aol.com
Subject: FW:  NIke iD shoes

-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn A  Miller [mailto:glennmill@juno.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 4:03 PM
To: JanetMoshier@cruisesinc.com; Piponi@aol.com; kperry@family.net;
rosscott@pacbell.net; Tishndic@gateway.net; budsteffen@earthlink.net;
ABHUMPHR@scwater.com;  Schneblyw@cs.com; syndeelynn@Yahoo.com;
jejenkins@earthlink.net; SRush22529@aol.com; Lindsey444@aol.com;
melita_miller@sbcss.k12.ca.us;  Kcromp3011@aol.com; TSchofi527@aol.com
Subject: Fw: NIke iD shoes

--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Terri Harry <tpharry@flash.net>
To: Undisclosed-recipients:;
Date: Fri, 09 Mar  2001 09:02:12 -0800
Subject: NIke iD shoes
Message-ID: <3AA90C94.74BC2CE2@flash.net>

Hi
If you've aleady received this, my  apologies. On the other hand, if not,

please read and forward around the world.

Nike now lets you personalize your shoes by submitting a word or  phrase
which they will stitch onto your shoes, under the  swoosh. So Jonah
Peretti
filled  out the form and sent them $50 to stitch "sweatshop" onto his
shoes.

Here's the responses he got... fun and games with Nike...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
From: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
To: "'Jonah H.  Peretti'" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
Subject: RE:  Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Your NIKE iD order was cancelled for one or more of the  following
reasons:

1) Your Personal iD contains another party's trademark
2) Your Personal iD contains the name of an athlete or team we  do not
have
the legal right to  use
3) Your Personal iD was left blank. Did you not want  any
personalization?
4) Your  Personal iD contains profanity or inappropriate slang, and
besides,
your mother would slap us.
If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product with a new  personalization
please visit us again at  www.nike.com

Thank you, NIKE iD

From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
To: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
Subject: RE: Your  NIKE iD order o16468000

Greetings,

My order was canceled but my personal NIKE iD does not violate  any of
the
criteria outlined in  your message. The Personal iD on my custom ZOOM XC
USA
running shoes was the word  "sweatshop."
Sweatshop is not:
1) another's party's trademark,
2) the name of an  athlete,
3) blank, or
4)  profanity.

I choose the iD because I wanted to remember the toil and labor  of the
children that made my shoes. Could you please  ship them to me
immediately.

Thanks and Happy New Year, Jonah Peretti

From: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
To: "'Jonah H.  Peretti'" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
Subject: RE:  Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD Customer,

Your NIKE iD order was cancelled because the iD you have  chosen
contains, as
stated in  the previous e-mail correspondence, "inappropriate slang".
If you wish to reorder your NIKE iD product with a new  personalization
please visit us again at nike.com

Thank you, NIKE iD

From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
To: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
Subject: RE: Your  NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD,

Thank you for your quick response to my inquiry about my custom  ZOOM XC
USA
running shoes.  Although I commend you for your prompt customer service,
I
disagree with the claim that my personal iD  was
inappropriate slang. After consulting Webster's  Dictionary, I discovered

that "sweatshop" is in fact part of standard English, and not  slang.

The word means: "a shop or factory in which workers are employed  for
long
hours at low wages and  under unhealthy conditions" and its origin dates
from  1892. So my personal iD does meet the criteria detailed in your
first
email.

Your web site advertises that the NIKE iD program is "about  freedom to
choose and freedom to express who you are." I  share Nike's love of
freedom
and  personal expression. The site also says that "If you want it
done right...build it yourself." I was thrilled to be able to build  my
own
shoes, and my personal iD  was offered as a small token of appreciation
for
the sweatshop workers poised to help me realize my vision. I  hope that
you
will value my  freedom of expression and reconsider your decision to
reject
my order.

Thank you, Jonah Peretti

From: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
To: "'Jonah H.  Peretti'" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
Subject: RE:  Your NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD Customer,

Regarding the rules for personalization it also states on the  NIKE iD
web
site that "Nike  reserves the right to cancel any personal iD up to 24
hours
after it has been submitted". In addition,  it further explains: "While
we
honor most personal iDs, we cannot honor every one.
Some may be (or contain) other's trademarks, or the names of  certain
professional sports teams, athletes or  celebrities that Nike does not
have
the right to use. Others may contain material that we consider
inappropriate or simply do not want to place on our  products.
Unfortunately, at times this obliges us to  decline personal iDs that may

otherwise seem unobjectionable. In any event, we will let you  know if we

decline your personal iD, and we will offer you the chance to  submit
another." With these rules in mind, we cannot  accept your order as
submitted. If you wish to reorder  your NIKE iD product with a new
personalization please  visit us again at www.nike.com

Thank you, NIKE iD

From: "Jonah H. Peretti" <peretti@media.mit.edu>
To: "Personalize, NIKE iD"  <nikeid_personalize@nike.com>
Subject: RE: Your  NIKE iD order o16468000

Dear NIKE iD,

Thank you for the time and energy you have spent on my request.  I have
decided to order the shoes with a different iD,  but I would like to make
one
small request. Could you please send me a color snapshot of the
ten-year-old Vietnamese girl who makes my shoes?

Thanks,
Jonah Peretti

As one forwarder writes:

... this will now go round the world much farther and faster  than any of
the
adverts they  paid Michael Jordan more than the entire wage packet of all

their sweatshop workers in the world to do...

I normally avoid making a plea to pass on these things,
but this time I say:

JUST DO IT

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno  offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join  Juno today!? For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


I sent you the regular online approval by mistake.  Below are clickpaper.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 11:36 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	12/11/2000 11:19 AM

		 To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Noel Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank
L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ClickPaper Approvals for 11/30/00


John:
I received the form of Guaranty by fax and it looks fine.  After you have
filled in the blanks, please fax it either to me or Susan and in the mean
time Susan will be sending you execution sets of the docs.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	"Shuttee, John" <ShutteeJ@EPEnergy.com>
	06/28/2000 09:07 AM

		 To: "'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc: "Shuttee, John" <ShutteeJ@EPEnergy.com>
		 Subject: EP-Enron ISDA Guaranty -f/u 6-28

Carol -

Two things:

* First, I will try to email this guaranty to you again, followed with
a fax.  Apparently both failed to go through yesterday.
* Second, I did some research and it turns out that our general
partner is El Paso Merchant Energy-Gas Company, and Cecelia Heilmann is an
officer authorized to sign for both this entity and the L.P..  So if you
want to alter the signature block reflecting this general partner, feel free
to do so.

Please let me know later this morning if you still did not get our Guaranty.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shuttee, John
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 8:37 AM
> To: 'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'
> Cc: Shuttee, John
> Subject: EP-Enron ISDA Guaranty
>
> Sorry, I thought I had.  Here it is.
>
> John
>
>  << File: EL  Guaranty 5-23 (Enron Form).doc >>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [SMTP:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
>  Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 8:18 AM
>  To: Shuttee, John
>  Subject: RE: Enron ISDA Final Draft 6-23
>
>
>  John:
>  Please send the Guaranty attachment.
>
>  Carol St. Clair
>  EB 3892
>  713-853-3989 (Phone)
>  713-646-3393 (Fax)
>  carol.st.clair@enron.com
>
>
>
>
>                      "Shuttee,
>
>                      John"                To:
> "'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
>                      <ShutteeJ@EPE        cc:
>
>                      nergy.com>           Subject:     RE: Enron ISDA
> Final Draft 6-23
>
>
>                      06/26/2000
>
>                      03:32 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Carol,
>
>  Enclosed is our adjusted guaranty that we had previously altered to
> meet
>  your requirements (sorry I didn't send this initially). Please see
> if this
>  is good for you.
>
>  John
>
>  PS:  Where is "receipt" you discussed below?  Page 1 of which
> document?
>   <<Enron Guarantee Format - 5-23.doc>>
>
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From:   Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [SMTP:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
>  > Sent:   Monday, June 26, 2000 1:03 PM
>  > To:     Shuttee, John
>  > Subject:     Re: Enron ISDA Final Draft 6-23
>  >
>  >
>  > John:
>  > The Schedules look fine.  Just one minor chnage which I can maker.
> In
>  the
>  > form of LC, I'm deleting the words "Rider 1" at the bottm and in
> the last
>  > paragrpah of page 1, chnagung the word "receipts" to "receipt".
> We will
>  > generate and send to you execution sets.  With respect to the
> Guaranty,
>  we
>  > would prefer that you sue the fopm which I sent to you a few weeks
> ago.
>  > Here it is.  This form is our updated form and matches up with the
> Enron
>  > Guaarnty that we are giving you.
>  > (See attached file: EL  Guaranty 5-23 (Enron Form).doc)
>  >
>  > Carol St. Clair
>  > EB 3892
>  > 713-853-3989 (Phone)
>  > 713-646-3393 (Fax)
>  > carol.st.clair@enron.com
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >                     "Shuttee,
>  >
>  >                     John"                To:     "'Carol St
> Clair'"
>  > <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
>  >                     <ShutteeJ@EPE        cc:     "Shuttee, John"
>  > <ShutteeJ@EPEnergy.com>
>  >                     nergy.com>           Subject:     Enron ISDA
> Final
>  > Draft 6-23
>  >
>  >
>  >                     06/26/2000
>  >
>  >                     08:29 AM
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Carol -
>  >
>  > Enclosed are what I hope will be the final drafts of the Schedule,
>  > Paragraph
>  > 13, LC provisions, and Schedule 1.
>  >
>  > I have accepted and incorporated the new changes you made plus all
> the
>  > changes which we have agreed upon.  I also changed the
> presentation of
>  our
>  > address in Part 4a of the schedule - it's the same information
> presented
>  > in
>  > a more concise way.  Finally, I changed the signature block on the
>  > schedule
>  > to eliminate EPME-Gas Company (it no longer exists) as a 'general
>  partner"
>  > -
>  > I don't know where that came from.
>  >
>  > Also enclosed is our version of the Guarantee.  Please let me know
> if any
>  > other changes are required.  If not, let's proceed with execution
> copies
>  -
>  > let me know if you want to generate them, or if you want me to.
>  >
>  > John
>  >
>  >  <<Enron Schedule -Our Draft 6-23.doc>>  <<Enron CSA - Our Draft
>  > 6-23.doc>>
>  >  <<EP Guarantee Format - 6-23.doc>>
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > ******************************************************************
>  > This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
>  > Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
>  > for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
>  > addressed. If you have received this email in error
>  > please notify the sender.
>  > ******************************************************************
>  >
>  > (See attached file: Enron Schedule -Our Draft 6-23.doc)
>  > (See attached file: Enron CSA - Our Draft 6-23.doc)
>  > (See attached file: EP Guarantee Format - 6-23.doc)
>  >  << File: EL  Guaranty 5-23 (Enron Form).doc >>  << File: Enron
> Schedule
>  > -Our Draft 6-23.doc >>  << File: Enron CSA - Our Draft 6-23.doc >>
> <<
>  > File: EP Guarantee Format - 6-23.doc >>
>
>  (See attached file: Enron Guarantee Format - 5-23.doc)
>   << File: Enron Guarantee Format - 5-23.doc >>