JUDY'S WORK & MONEY LIFEMINDERS FOR 11/29/2000

IN THE SPOTLIGHT

* Top 10 Ways to Blow Your Bonus

WORKING SMARTER

* Make LifeMinders Your Personal Computers & Technology Guide

MANAGING MONEY

* The Rising Cost of Staying Well

THE LIGHTER SIDE

* DILBERT The Short List: Top 10 Things To Do Before You Go On Vacation

INTERACTIVE LIFEMINDERS

* LifeMinders JobCenter

-----------------------------------------------------------

================
IN THE SPOTLIGHT
================

TOP 10 WAYS TO BLOW YOUR BONUS

You,ve worked hard all year. So when you get your well-deserved bonus,
indulge yourself; live a little! Just in case you don't have any ideas of
your own already lined up, check out these 10 great ways to spend your
year-end bonus.
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119697&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

===============
WORKING SMARTER
===============

MAKE LIFEMINDERS YOUR PERSONAL COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY GUIDE

You know that LifeMinders helps bring sanity to your everyday life; now let
us bring some sanity to your digital life, as well. Check out the all-new
LifeMinders Computers & Technology, the latest addition to our great line-up
of personalized e-mails. Computers & Tech will be your special guide to all
things digital. We'll introduce you to the coolest products, offer help,
tips, and downloads for your computer, and we'll provide reviews and
recommendations that will help you save money when buying gadgets and gear.
So don't delay, click below and sign up today!

http://www.lfmn.com/LifeMinder30/GoldII/Index.asp?uid=602737979&vc=8496&pr=17&
tr=ethcom

***COOL STUFF***
Lose those glasses for good! Click here for FREE information about Laser
Vision Surgery.
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119619&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

==============
MANAGING MONEY
==============

-Smart Money Tips-
THE RISING COST OF STAYING WELL

Brace yourself: the ever-rising cost of health insurance is sure to take a
bigger bite out of your paycheck in the new year. Here's what you need to
know to be sure you still get the best coverage and value for your health
insurance dollar.
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119087&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

** Stay in the know! Click below to get instant alerts on news that affects
your health and your wealth!
http://www.lifeminders.alerts.com/lifeminders/fs_main.jsp?c=add&Address=judy.h
ernandez@enron.com&Cat=WM

***COOL STUFF***
We need Your City residents' opinions(And they could be worth $1000!
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119611&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

================
THE LIGHTER SIDE
================

DILBERT THE SHORT LIST: TOP 10 THINGS TO DO BEFORE YOU GO ON VACATION

From the pages of Dilbert.com
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119583&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

THE SHORT LIST: Top 10 Things To Do Before You Go On Vacation

1. Bring all your stuff to work and pack there.
- alohabert

2. Every time your pointy-haired boss asks about a task, answer loudly with,
"DO YOU SPEAK ENGLISH?"
- I love those little mints on my pillow-bert.

3. Use the mailroom to pre-stamp your postcards.
- MK in SC

4. Require a two-drink minimum to enter your cube.
- buzzy

5. Wear a swimsuit to the executive washroom.
- Prophet-bert

============================================================

***COOL STUFF***

5.65% APY Money Market account from Membership B@nking from American Express
Centurion Bank. Click here for details.
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=7&c=119583&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

============================================================

6. Add a paper umbrella every time you're asked to make a cup of coffee. (I
get paid $56K to make coffee???)
- Decorationbert

7. Spend the entire day "clearing your calendar" (which you emptied during
the preceding days).
- Been-there-done-that-Bert

8. Set voice mail and e-mail to the "out of office" settings at the beginning
of the day before vacation so that, "I won't forget to do it before I leave."
- then ignore all but the personal stuff

9. Go to a conference in a vacation area, take vacation there, and fly both
ways on company money.
- My company allows this

10. The boss says we don't get overtime for any time worked outside the
office because our "mere presence in the office is valuable." Now I count my
office web surfing as work time because my "mere presence in the office is
valuable."
- Not vacation, but not work

============================================================

Vote on Today's List
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=5&c=119583&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Submit Entries for Upcoming Topics
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=6&c=119583&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Future topics include:

12/03/2000 Cruelest Human Resources Programs
12/05/2000 Fun Things to Do to the Computers of Vacationing Co-Workers

============================================================
 =======================
INTERACTIVE MINDERS
=======================

NEW! CareerScopes!

See what's in your job future...

Aries
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=108748&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Taurus
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=2&c=108748&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Gemini
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=3&c=108748&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Cancer
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=4&c=108748&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Leo
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=5&c=108748&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Virgo
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=6&c=108748&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Libra
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=7&c=108748&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Scorpio
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=8&c=108748&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Sagittarius
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=9&c=108748&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Capricorn
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=10&c=108748&pr=953&cf=
1&pa=0&e=S

Aquarius
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=11&c=108748&pr=953&cf=
1&pa=0&e=S

Pisces
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=12&c=108748&pr=953&cf=
1&pa=0&e=S

Click BELOW to find jobs in your area!
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=13&c=108748&pr=953&cf=
1&pa=0&e=S

-----------------------------------------------------------
**ADVERTISEMENTS**

FREE CDs... FREE CDs...Order FREE CDs from BMG Music Service! Get 12 CDs for
the price of 1, with nothing more to buy, ever! It's that simple.
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119347&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Your Opinion Counts ... And We'll Reward You For It!
Join the NPD Online Research Team. Your opinions will be heard by decision
makers worldwide and, you,ll have a chance to WIN CASH starting with the
chance to win $1,000 for registering to join!  Just visit us at:
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119556&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Low Rate Line of Credit from Membership B@nking - American Express Centurion
Bank.  Click here!
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119547&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

FREE CDs... FREE CDs...Order FREE CDs from BMG Music Service! Get 12 CDs for
the price of 1, with nothing more to buy, ever! It's that simple.
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119557&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

4 Books for 4 Bucks. No commitment(no kidding! Get 4 books for 4 bucks with
NO COMMITMENT from Quality Paperback Book Club. Click for details.
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119559&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Hate your glasses? Tired of contact lenses? Lose them! Learn more about laser
vision surgery. Use this FREE resource to get the information you need and to
find a specialist in your area.
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119348&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

-----------------------------------------------------------

JUDY'S TOOLS

Improve My Work & Money LifeMinders
http://www.lfmn.com/LifeMinder30/GoldII/Index.asp?uid=602737979&vc=8496&pr=5&t
r=etswea

Sign Me Up for Another Category
http://www.lfmn.com/LifeMinder30/AdXfert/index.asp?uid=602737979&vc=8496&tr=et
swea

Tell a Friend
http://www.lfmn.com/fnf/friendsfamily.asp?uid=602737979&vc=8496&mktg=LANY31

Change My Registration Information
http://www.lfmn.com/LifeMinder30/GoldII/Index.asp?uid=602737979&vc=8496&pr=0&t
r=etswea

Send Questions mailto:info@lifeminders.com

LifeMinders Work & Money is sponsored by:

WIN great prizes or up to $1,000,000 cash when you play online games! Click
here.
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119562&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S
Get 4 books for $4. Click for details.
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119564&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S
Lose 10 Pounds in 5 Weeks with eDiets.com!
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119567&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S
InsWeb - Where You and Your Insurance Really Click!
http://ww1.lfmn.com/actv/sr2.asp?u=602737979&v=8496&url=1&c=119568&pr=953&cf=1
&pa=0&e=S

Your e-mail address on record with LifeMinders is judy.hernandez@enron.com.

Questions? Comments? Suggestions?  Please help us respond to your requests and
input by writing to us at: info@lifeminders.com instead of replying to this
message (we sent this to you from a "send-only" mailbox).

LifeMinders e-mails are never sent unsolicited. LifeMinders only sends
e-mails to
registered members. If you would like to unsubscribe from only the LifeMinders
Work & Money product, click the link below.
http://www.lfmn.com/lifeminder30/GoldII/unsub/product/unsubscribeproduct.asp?u
id=602737979&vc=8496&pr=5
or you can send an email to unsubscribe-work@lifeminders.com . If you wish to
unsubscribe from all LifeMinders products, please click below.
http://www.lfmn.com/lifeminder30/GoldII/Index.asp?uid=602737979&vc=8496&pr=101
&tr=eehwea

Copyright (c) 2000 LifeMinders, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.  For complete
terms and
conditions of use, see:  http://www.lfmn.com/privacy/terms.html

Lifeminders, Inc. is a publicly traded company, Nasdaq: LFMN.  Click below for
investor relations.  http://www.lfmn.com/investors/index.asp


do you have rory's email address?


It s/b sitara # 695208.


?
sparesFinder Friends
?
In their quarterly review, The Sunday Times  and Bathwick Group have ranked
sparesFinder at number 47 of Europe's top 100  e-businesses, dubbed the
"e-League". We are delighted to be named and to debut  more than half way up
the list. (For those of you receiving this message in  plain text, you can
find the e-League commentary page at
http://www.bathwick.com/ir/eleague/commentary.shtml)
?
Please note the mention we get in paragraph  two, as "a young company with a
great concept," in the update commentary below.  For the full review, just
click on the Top 100 and see sparesFinder at 47.  You'll also see us in The
Sunday Times itself when the e-League is printed in  the new year.
?
Coming on the heels of recent reviews from  Schroder Salomon Smith Barney and
Goldman Sachs, this is further good news and  endorsement for the
sparesFinder initiative. Thank you for your support  and?role in helping make
this happen.
?

The Sunday Times
e-League home
in association with
The Bathwick Group

Click below to view the  NEW top 100

To Top 100

E-league Contents- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Assessment criteria- Have
your say- Email  subscription

Previous Rankings- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Launch - 2 July 2000- 6
Aug  2000

E-league Sponsors- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -CazenoveHewlett PackardKPMG
Oracle

Disclaimer

Return to Bathwick Investment  Research

[IMAGE]
The e-league is updated on a  regular basis. If you would like to receive
updates please register  today.

	Brief commentary - October update
	This update sees one notable exit ) that of  Boxman.com from no.20 last time
(August). Boxman had a good  management team, business model, cost control,
and customer base,  but was a victim of over-ambition and negative investor
sentiment in  the light of long or lengthening periods of losses. Others
will  probably follow over the coming months.

	As with the last  update, though, there's more good news than bad ) new
entries  include a number of strong b2b companies, including
Sparesfinder.com, a young company with a great concept for cutting  costs for
heavy industries.

	On a general note, The standard  of companies in the e-league (against which
all are judged)  continues to improve, and scores have been adjusted to
reflect the  improving average.

	There are still some notable exceptions  that warrant a place in the league,
but from which we have been so  far unable to obtain sufficient data for the
assessment, including  many continental European companies such as
Chateauonline, and  Mercateo and other UK companies like Medexonline.

	Future  developments will include more analysis of individual market sectors
and the addition of selected company profiles ) we will provide more  details
on this site over the next month.

	The Sunday Times and The Bathwick  Group would like to extend their thanks to
the sponsors of the  e-League

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
		1
		?band-x.com
		2
		?mondus.com
		3
		?deal4free.com
		4
		?jobserve.com
		5
		?silicon.com
		6
		?wgsn.com
		7
		?beenz.com
		8
		?moreover.com
		9
		?sportal.com
		10
		?vavo.com
		11
		?thinknatural.com
		12
		?europeaninvestor.com
		13
		?streetsonline.co.uk
		14
		?blackstar.co.uk
		15
		?tiss.com
		16
		?netdoktor.com
		17
		?sharepeople.com
		18
		?goindustry.com
		19
		?peoplesound.com
		20
		?kelkoo.com

		To view the full Top 100 table click here.


APB

missing 2 deals:

buy mieco
11-31
25 mw
465.00
palo

sell mieco
11-31
25 mw
475.00
SP-15

NATSOURCE

476285, broker says this deal is no good.

thanks


Gisb

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Beth A Ryan/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000 02:03
PM ---------------------------

Mel Davis <Mel@travelpark.com> on 02/23/2000 01:29:07 PM
To: "'beth.a.ryan@enron.com'" <beth.a.ryan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Stanley Horton hotel

                                                   SALES AGT: MD/X92W5Y

                                          HORTON/STANLEY
                                          *50TH* FLOOR

  ENRON CORP
  1400 SMITH STREET
  HOUSTON TX 77002

  DATE:  FEB 23 2000

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

HOTEL                 29FEB FOUR SEASONS WASHINGTON
                      01MAR 2800 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW
                             WASHINGTON, DC 20007
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 202-342-0444
                            FAX: 202-944-2076
                            TELEX: 904008
                            CONFIRMATION: 96046850
                            SINGLE KING SIZE BED
                            RATE: ENR USD 260.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            CANCELLATION POLICY: REQUIRES CANCEL BY 6PM
                            DAY OF ARRIVAL
                            NONSMOKING KING ENRON CORP
          TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL 6PM DAY OF ARRIVAL HOTEL TIME

MISCELLANEOUS         30APR HOUSTON
                      SUN   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

HORTON/STANLEY C(FTF)(IDS1C0366R00814)

SECRETARY - CINDY STARK: 853-6197


Utilities' Demand Blocks Bailout
NEGOTIATIONS HIT SNAG: PG&E, Edison want end to price freeze if they sell
transmission lines to state David Lazarus, Chronicle Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 21, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/21/M
N114450.DTL
California's near-bankrupt utilities are demanding that higher electric rates
be a part of any deal to sell the state their power lines, The Chronicle has
learned.
A rate increase -- perhaps of more than 50 percent, according to earlier
industry estimates -- would certainly draw a firestorm of protest from
consumer groups and force Gov. Gray Davis to backtrack from earlier pledges
that rates would remain unchanged.
Nevertheless, sources close to negotiations on the deal said Pacific Gas and
Electric Co. and Southern California Edison are attempting to make higher
rates a condition for agreeing to a bailout scheme in which they would sell
the state their transmission systems and some land.
The sources said the talks hit a new snag this week when state officials
realized that fine print sought by the companies could require the Public
Utilities Commission to pass along all of the utilities' costs to ratepayers.
The sources said this would end a rate freeze that shields consumers from
runaway wholesale electricity prices.
The inclusion of potential rate increases in the talks reflects the growing
complexity of a deal originally intended by Davis to stabilize the finances
of PG&E and Edison so banks would resume loans to the cash-strapped
utilities.
The negotiations subsequently have expanded to involve a state purchase of
the utilities' transmission networks and acquisition of utility-owned land,
including spectacular coastal property near PG&E's Diablo Canyon nuclear
power plant.
Now they also have embraced further deregulation of California's
dysfunctional electricity market.
"Clearly, one of the terms being discussed is the regulatory environment,"
said Joseph Fichera, head of Saber Partners, a New York investment bank that
is advising Davis in the talks.
"The past situation has not worked well," he added. "The utilities want some
certainty about their future."
TENTATIVE DEAL WITH EDISON
To date, the governor has announced a tentative agreement with Edison for the
state to buy the utility's power lines for almost $3 billion. Discussions
with PG&E for a similar accord have dragged on for weeks.
An Edison official, asking that his name be withheld, acknowledged yesterday
that an end to the rate freeze is an expected result of the power- line sale.
"Once the details of the pact are complete, dominoes will fall," the official
said. "One of the dominoes is the rate freeze."
A PG&E spokesman declined to comment.
In fact, both Edison and PG&E have been aggressively seeking an end to the
rate freeze for months.
The two utilities have a lawsuit pending in federal court demanding that the
PUC immediately raise rates so the utilities can recover almost $13 billion
in debt accrued as a result of the freeze.
"They have been trying a lot of things to get the rate freeze ended in
various forms," said Carl Wood, who sits on the PUC. "Adding it to the
present talks is consistent with past behavior."
Wall Street has taken note that the negotiations no longer appear to be
making progress.
Paul Patterson, an energy industry analyst at Credit Suisse First Boston,
told clients on Monday that the discussions "may have lost some momentum in
recent days." He did not give a reason.
For his part, the governor sounded unusually cautious about the course of the
talks when asked late last week if a breakthrough was imminent.
SECRET STICKING POINTS
"We are going to take the transmission systems and the land that's deeded,
and we will work out an agreement," Davis said at an appearance in San Jose.
"But there are a number of sticking points in the talks with PG&E that I'm
not going to reveal."
One of those sticking points apparently is an insistence that the sale of
utility assets include a long-sought lifting of the rate freeze.
Sources said lawyers from both PG&E and Edison had inserted the related terms
into draft accords affecting each utility, and that the full impact of the
additions was not realized by state officials until this week.
One source said the language was just convoluted enough to slip beneath the
radar screen of state negotiators. But the upshot, once the words had been
parsed, was that the PUC effectively would lose control over power rates.
CREDITWORTHINESS ON THE TABLE
In Edison's case, the terms of the tentative deal include the governor asking
the PUC "to support the creditworthiness" of the utility.
"This would ensure that future investments in both utility distribution and
utility generation plants are provided fair returns of and on capital,
consistent with current authorized returns and capital structure provisions,"
it says.
Sources said the provision could be interpreted as a guarantee from the state
that Edison would be permitted to recoup all outstanding costs from
ratepayers.
"There may be some assumptions about this language that the rate freeze ends
if it is adopted," the Edison official said, adding that he saw no reason to
disagree with such assumptions.
But Fichera, Davis' adviser in the talks, insisted that nothing is set in
stone, and that the negotiations are proceeding without a hitch.
"This is a very complex transaction," he said. "God and the devil are in the
details."
E-mail David Lazarus at dlazarus@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1


Could you please take a look at this and coordinate with Joanie to fix?

Thanks,

Eric
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000 05:48 PM
---------------------------

Joanie H Ngo
02/23/2000 03:33 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Katherine Herrera/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Southern Union Galveston/Pt. Arthur

Eric,

Could you find some time to look at the new Southern Union contract for
Galveston and Port Arthur?  Pricings are wrong in Sitara so my system
invoices are being understated/overstated each month.

If you want, we could sit down and go over it to see what needs to be done.

Let me know.

Thanks.

Joanie
x36574


Sally

Thanks for the note.  I will look forward to seeing you hear next week and
meeting with you in person for at least an hour or so.

John

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           14/03/2000 15:58

To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Trip to London Next Week

Brent Price and I will be in the London office next week, arriving Monday
morning and returning to Houston on Friday.  The purpose of my visit is in
regard to my Global Risk Management Operations role,   I believe that Rick
Causey met with you regarding some operations support that Brent and I will
provide to Fernley during a transition period prior to the arrival and during
the assimilation of Michael Jordan, the JP Morgan staffer that Fernley has
hired.  Brent and I will be working with Fernley next week to iron out the
details of our support for Fernley during that transition period.  We will
also map out an Enron trading operations introduction  for Michael Jordan,
which may involve a short stint for him in Houston.  My goal is to provide a
strong resource to Fernley during this transition period and to work with
Fernley to provide whatever assistance, training, and orientation to Michael
in his role so that his assimilation can be as smooth and effective as
possible.

Another purpose for the trip is to spend some time with Fernley and his
business controllers  to get their ideas on specific goals that as a group we
would commit to for 2000.  I know that Barry and Richard Sage have many good
ideas on how we can leverage knowledge and best practices across all Enron
locations with trading operations.  My earlier trips to London this year were
focused solely on Helsinki, and did not allow time to positively focus on
leveraging worldwide operations experience.  I value input from other trading
operations professionals and I look forward to the ideas that can be
generated in working with Barry, Richard and some of their direct reports.

I also contacted Tani Nath about my trip to see how I could support her as
she moves into her role in Global Products.  I have not heard  from Tani, but
I understand from others that she will be in the Houston office next week.
It will be unfortunate to miss her on my trip, but based on my commitments in
Houston and Rick Causey's desire to move forward on providing trading
operations support to Fernley, next week is the best for me to be in London.
I did meet with Tani for an hour when she was here week before last and
offered to help her in any way if she made the decision to accept the role
over Global Products.  I trust that she will contact me for that support as
needed.

I have scheduled a short meeting one on one with you while I am there to
discuss how my global role can provide support and resources for your
business efforts in London.  I look forward to meeting with you next week.

This trip is not a leg of the worldwide operations/control review that we are
conducting at Joe Sutton's request.   By circumstance, as you know, we have
taken a look at Helsinki and subsequently Oslo and Frankfurt.  There will be
a similar review of Continental power, UK gas, UK power and global liquids.
The review teams are currently focused on operations/controls reviews of
North American locations and some entities in the US in which Enron has a
large ownership position.  It is likely that the continuation of this effort
in London will occur in mid April.

Copies of the drafts of the findings for Oslo and Frankfurt were provided to
Fernley as soon as the team returned to Houston.  We hope to finalise those
drafts this week as we receive comments from Fernley and the business
managers in Oslo and Frankfurt to whom those drafts were provided.  Fernley
suggested that you would like to see the drafts as opposed to the final
copies, so I will have those forwarded to you today.  The Sydney and
Singapore trip was a lengthy one, as it also involved a last leg of the trip
in London with regard to support for SIngapore.  The Houston team returned
the middle of last week and worked with AA on an early draft last Friday.  I
can also provide you with a draft of that report, the completion of which was
pending input from Bill Bradford early this week (he made the trip but was
out of the office last week).  We did do a preliminary review of the Sydney
and Singapore findings with Rick Causey and Rick Buy on Friday afternoon, to
accommodate the fact that both are out on vacation this week.  They
understood the preliminary nature of the draft that was reviewed with them.


Attached is the Blue Dog LLC agreement:


As many of you already know, Brett Hunsucker has accepted a new position with
ERCOT in Texas.  His new position is a Client Representative for the new
deregulated market.

We will be wishing Brett and Holly a fond farewell on Thursday evening.  The
time and place will be determined later this week, but please plan on joining
us to congratulate Brett on his new opportunity!


Please disregard my previous note.  This one has the minutes from today's
meeting attached.  I'll forward the Singapore presentation and the Japan gas
comments in the near future.

Please let me know if there is anything you'd like to add to the agenda for
the next meeting.

Mike

813-5219-4584


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread77.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread77.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread77.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack77.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack77.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Comments...?

TV

---------------------- Forwarded by Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT on 08/05/2000 10:03
---------------------------

Tomas Valnek
02/05/2000 18:57
To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Stuart Ffoulkes/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon Duff/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Electronic Approval

Further to some of my recent email attached are two templates for approval
forms. They take the same information, expect that one has drop-down menus.
Please have a look and give me your comments on contents, functionality....

Many thanks

Tomas


Group,

Our discussion forum notes as a group are significantly improved in the past
3 weeks in many areas.  I believe communication in the group at shift changes
is improving and is quite good in general.  However, there is always room for
more improvement.  Specifically, other traders in the group and on the floor
would benefit from more detailed information regarding outages.  Please try
to include the reason for a plant derate as well as the ETR when a unit is
lost.  I would also highly recommend notifying the cash desk in the region
affected by the outage, either by email or verbally.  An important outage was
recently missed by both the real-time group and another cash desk on the
floor.  Real-time had ready access to the information concerning the outage
but did not pass that information on to others in the group at the shift
change or others on the floor.  In this case, such poor communication simply
made us look foolish.  We work hard for (and justly deserve) the solid
reputation we have on the floor.  Let's make sure we do the little things to
maintain it.

Again, keep up the good work.
Bill


If interested in the timeline of deregulation activities
in California read on, otherwise please delete...dsg

CC list suppressed...

January 20, 2001

Anatomy of a Jolt

A timeline of key events in California utility
deregulation

1993 The California Public Utilities Commission's division
of strategic planning publishes the "yellow book"
exploring how the state might deregulate its power market.

1994 The PUC issues an order, informally called the "blue
book," that officially initiates a study of power-industry
restructuring in California.

1995 The PUC issues an order stating that electric
customers in California should be able to choose their
power provider by 2003 and that some of the state's
largest investor-owned utilities should sell a portion of
their power plants and turn over their transmission lines
to an independent operator to facilitate competition.

1996 Gov. Pete Wilson signs Assembly Bill 1890 to open
California's electricity market to competition. The bill
calls for most customers to get the right to choose
electricity suppliers in 1998, mandates a 10% rate cut the
same year for small commercial and residential customers
and allows the three biggest investor-owned utilities in
the state to issue as much as $10 billion in bonds to
finance the transition from monopoly status to full
competition.

1997 Utilities begin taking steps to divest themselves of
power-generation plants. Southern California Edison, a
unit of Edison International, and Pacific Gas & Electric
announce the sale of 13 generation plants in line with the
PUC's divestiture policy.

1998
* Rates that utilities can charge consumers are capped
until the utilities complete the divestment, expected in
2002.
* Small commercial and residential customers of
California's investor-owned utilities begin receiving the
10% discount on their power rates mandated in AB 1890.
* The California Power Exchange and the California
Independent System Operator begin functioning.
* Utility customers who chose an alternative power
provider also receive their first deliveries through the
new provider.
* Californians vote no on Proposition 9, a ballot
initiative that would have prohibited the use of customer
revenue to finance the utilities' bonds.

1999 San Diego Gas & Electric, a unit of Sempra Energy,
becomes the first California utility to deregulate,
allowing it to lift the price cap. Within a year,
customers' bills triple as the utility passes on high
wholesale power costs.

2000
* May 22: The California Independent System Operator,
manager of the state power grid, declares the first of 36
Stage 2 alerts, when power reserves drop below 5%.
* June 15: Rolling blackouts in San Francisco affect
thousands. The blackouts are caused by slim power supplies
due to several Northern California power plants shut down
for maintenance.
* Aug. 2: California agencies are beset by major
electricity shortages. Gov. Gray Davis calls for
investigation into possible price manipulation in the
wholesale electricity market.
* Sept. 7: State regulators approve a plan for San Diego
customers that caps their rates for three years.
* Sept. 11: Federal probe of California power prices
begins.
* Oct. 31: Federal panel suggests California abolish a
mandatory-buy rule.
* Dec. 7: ISO declares first Stage 3 emergency as power
reserves fall below 1.5%. Conservation efforts avert
rolling blackouts.
* Dec 15: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
approves a flexible rate-cap plan, but allows power
suppliers to charge utilities more if they can prove a
higher price is warranted.
* Dec. 26: Southern California Edison sues FERC, alleging
the agency failed to ensure that wholesale electricity is
sold at reasonable rates.

2001:
* Jan. 4: State regulators approve emergency rate
increases of 7% to 15% for customers of SoCal Edison and
PG&E, who say they have lost billions of dollars because
they cannot pass on high wholesale costs to customers.
They later warn of bankruptcy and layoffs.
* Jan. 11: ISO declares Stage 3 alert, but stops short of
ordering blackouts. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson
extends emergency order requiring out-of-state companies
to sell power to California.
* Jan. 16: ISO declares Stage 3 alert as several plants
report a shortage of natural gas needed to operate. Edison
says it doesn't have the money to pay $596 million it owes
this week.
* Jan. 17: ISO orders the first rolling blackouts of
California's electricity crisis. The outages affect
several hundred thousand customers in northern and central
California. Gov. Gray Davis signs emergency order allowing
the state Department of Water Resources to buy power as
part of a plan to stave off the utilities' bankruptcy and
further blackouts.
* Jan. 18: California cuts off power to thousands of
people for a second straight day as lawmakers rushed to
enact emergency legislation to buy electricity at taxpayer
expense and keep the lights on.
* Jan. 19: State regulators slap California's two largest
utilities with an order barring them from cutting off
power to the 25 million people they serve. The lights were
expected to stay on through the weekend in California, but
the state order didn't completely erase the possibility of
more rolling blackouts ordered by managers of the state
power grid.

Source: The Wall Street Journal and Associated Press


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000 11:27 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Benjamin Thomason                           05/08/2000 09:20 AM

To: Clement Lau/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FPL Assets

Clement,

Here is the first run on the FPL Map and Excel grid.  I found some additional
plant information on the FPL home page, and I aligned the presentations with
the home page as my main source.

I plotted the locations by city and net MW, because that was in the key to
the Enron asset page.  Please let me know if you would like me to change it
to plant name.  Also, there are several wind projects in the cities of
Altamont and Tehachapi, CA.  I totaled the projects' net MW and listed them
under their respective city.

Finally, the only pages that I altered on the PowerPoint presentation were
the map pages.  The rest of the presenation is still in the Reliant format.

Regards,

Ben


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,
Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain these outages.
In addition to the excel document, there is a dbf file that is formatted like the daily delivery you receive nightly. This will enable you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.
Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS
E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.
 - 110701R.xls
 - OUTAGE.dbf


Speaking of Canadian eligible contract participants...I was told from an
originator in Canada that per someone in Enron Canada's legal department,
Canadian contract participants are not held to the same standards as US (i.e.
they are not required to have minimum assets &/or equity etc.).  Is this
true???  Please advise and forward to me the eligible contract participant
information we discussed at the happy-hour last wednesday.

Thanks
WEndy
---------------------- Forwarded by Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron on 03/09/2001
05:08 PM ---------------------------

MARY COOK@ECT
03/09/2001 02:06 PM
To: Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark
Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT
cc: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendy
Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan
Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT

Subject: Canada Work Report

See attached.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


got a call last night from Carbide - they rescinded the change from 14,000/d
rate to 6,000/d rate for safety net gas that was due 9am this morning.

So here's where we should be now with Carbide:

Seadrift - no saftey net, just the 10,000/d baseload deal

Texas City - 10,000/d of the term deal, plus 14,000/d of safety net, total
24,000/d

call with questions

Lee
3.5923


Please disregard the first attachment on the invitation memo sent on Monday, September 17, 2001 as it was sent in error.

Thanks,
Ava
713-853-5842


I had also received the filing and likewise Susan (Scott) Lindberg had received one.  Susan's copy has been forwarded to Blair/Teb for regulatory review as well as being available in Houston for Marketing to review.  It's a bound document about 2 inches thick including the testimony.  Importantly it includes SoCal's proposal for receipt point capacity.  I've only read the transmittal letter thus far but will continue reviewing it for more detail.

Steve, would you want to designate someone from Marketing to review key sections?  I would offer to let them know which areas or sections of the filing could use input from Marketing before we decide whether or not to comment on SoCal's proposal or to simply intervene at this time, monitor progress and provide input later in the proceeding if necessary.

Other comments?  gh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Dan Douglass" <douglass@energyattorney.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Dan+20Douglass+22+20+3Cdouglass+40energyattorney+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:57 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Pryor, Tony; Hass, Glen; Fossum, Drew
Subject:	Re: SoCalGas Developments

Steve,

Will do.  Will review filing and get back to you with any implications for
TW.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harris, Steven" <Steven.Harris@enron.com>
To: "Pryor, Tony" <Tony.Pryor@enron.com>; "Hass, Glen"
<Glen.Hass@enron.com>; "Fossum, Drew" <Drew.Fossum@enron.com>
Cc: <douglass@energyattorney.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:02 PM
Subject: RE: SoCalGas Developments

> At a minimum, we need to intervene as an interested party.
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pryor, Tony
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:00 PM
> > To: Harris, Steven; Hass, Glen; Fossum, Drew
> > Cc: 'douglass@energyattorney.com'
> > Subject: FW: SoCalGas Developments
> >
> > Steve and Glen, I'm passing this on to you.  I will be in Calgary
> > after today for the rest of the week.  Drew, I talked to Glen and if
> > he and Steve think an immediate intervention is needed before Monday,
> > Glen will check with you and get approval to work directly with
> > Dan..................Tony
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Dan Douglass" <douglass@energyattorney.com>@ENRON
> > [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Dan+20Douglass+22+20+3Cdouglass+40energyattorney
> > +2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:51 PM
> > To: Pryor, Tony
> > Subject: SoCalGas Developments
> >
> >
> > Tony, SoCalGas sent out last week a copy of its new Biennial Cost
> > Allocation Proceeding ("BCAP") application.  The nominal purpose of
> > the  filing is to revise rates for gas service effective 1/1/03 and to
> > revise rates  to reflect an updated allocation among customers of
> > non-commodity costs of  service.  The utility also requests authority
> > to revise and simplify  various tariffs and to "implement several new
> > programs which will enhance the  efficient use and operation of its
> > gas transportation system."
> >
> > I am calling this to your attention because I recommend that
> > Transwestern  monitor this proceeding, review the application and
> > determine how active (if at  all) it may wish to be in this
> > proceeding.  The utility will be forecasting  both gas demand and gas
> > prices during 2003-2004, presenting two cost allocation  studies and
> > two rate proposals.  They will also be proposing that the  Commission
> > switch from long run marginal cost to embedded cost principles for
> > allocating costs of service among its customers.  The also propose a
> > $187  million or 12.5% rate increase annually, compared to present
> > rates.
> >
> > The utility discusses in detail the issues of interstate pipeline
> > capacity  and storage reservation for the core and the projected
> > annual cost of the core  interstate pipeline capacity reservation.
> > Their capacity issues witness  advocates continued core responsibility
> > for its portion of the ITCS.  He  also makes proposals designed to
> > enhance customer access to SoCalGas  transmission and storage assets,
> > some of which were surfaced initially in the  context of the Natural
> > Gas Strategy proceeding.  He proposes firm  intrastate receipt points,
> > an open season to solicit interest in an expansion of  the backbone
> > system, a new in-kind fuel charge for transmission and an expansion
> > of the unbundled storage program to include gas loaning services.
> > finally,  they also propose incremental expansions of both
> > transmissionand storage  capacity.
> >
> > Tony, it seems to me that Transwestern should monitor this proceeding,
> > review the application thoroughly (including a supplement that
> > SoCalGas says it  will be filing soon) and make a decision as to
> > whether the proposed changes will  affect the SoCalGas-Transwestern
> > relationship and/or the relationships between  Transwestern and its
> > shippers.  You can then decide whether monitoring is  sufficient or if
> > you need to participate.
> >
> > One last thing:
> > Yesterday,  the Southern California Generation Coalition ("SCGC")
> > submitted a motion to  supplement the Phase II record in the OII
> > proceeding.  SCGC noted that  the OII has discussed  SoCalGas'
> > requested approval of Advice Letters  Nos. 3002 and 3029.  SCGC argued
> > in  both its opening and reply brief that Schedule GT-F clearly
> > requires SoCalGas to  provide firm, full requirements service to
> > customers electing that service  option.  Alternatively, SCGC argued
> > that to the extent Schedule GT-F is ambiguous, it must be construed in
> > favor of  customers in the Imperial and San Joaquin Valleys.
> > However,  the SoCalGas BCAP Application described above submits
> > proposed  revisions to Schedule GT-F.  SCGC  complains that SoCalGas
> > did not disclose, in its reply brief, the fact that it  was seeking in
> > its BCAP Application to revise the language of Schedule  GT-F.  The
> > motion states that, "The  additional language SoCalGas has added to
> > Schedule GT-F clearly constitutes an  admission, through conduct by
> > SoCalGas, that Schedule GT-F is not clear on its  face.  It
> > constitutes an admission  that Schedule GT-F, as now constituted,
> > needs to be clarified.  It admits that Schedule GT-F is  ambiguous
> > and, in making that admission, resolves the ambiguity."  SCGC  then
> > requests the record be reopened to reflect these facts.
> >
> > Let  me know what you would like to do with regard to the SoCalGas
> > application....and  please pass this on to Steve Harris for his
> > information.   Thanks!
> > Dan
> >
> > Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
> > 5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.   Suite 244
> > Woodland Hills, CA 91367
> > Tel:   (818)  596-2201
> > Fax:  (818) 346-6502douglass@energyattorney.com << File:
> > mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com >>
> >
> >  - LA1118909.DOC << File: LA1118909.DOC >>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
> **********************************************************************


Whatever avista has to say regarding this matter is correct.  We did agree to add an additional $1.00 per MW to have the power delivered elsewhere.

Bert Meyers


Soaring Electric Use More Fiction Than Fact
Chronicle investigation finds power companies manipulate data to excuse their
towering rates Christian Berthelsen, Scott Winokur, Chronicle Staff Writers
Sunday, March 11, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/11/M
N213155.DTL

Power companies say it so often, and with such certainty, that it has become
a virtual mantra: "Skyrocketing" energy use by Californians is a root cause
of the state's power crisis, and justification for surging electricity
prices.
But a computer analysis of electricity usage data by The Chronicle reveals
that the mantra is a myth -- that overall growth in electricity demand hasn't
been nearly as great as the industry portrays it.
The industry has painted the summer of 2000 as the equivalent of a 100-year
storm in meteorology -- an event so powerful and unexpected that the existing
infrastructure was devastated by its force.
The statistics show that 2000, taken in total, was nothing of the sort.
Moreover, two independent state agencies' assessments of California's power
plant capacity appear to show that the growth should have been easily
accommodated.
The companies have defended their practice of increasingly taking power-
generation plants out of service by arguing that heavy demand and consequent
plant usage necessitated major, time-consuming repairs.
"The claims that demand growth is rampant and that it was totally unexpected
and due to the Internet economy, to Silicon Valley, or server farms,
or people recharging cell phones -- that's bogus," said Tom Kelly, assistant
executive director of the California Energy Commission. "About as bogus as
you can get."
The Chronicle's findings are based on data collected by the California
Independent System Operator, a manager of the state's electricity grid. They
show:
-- Total electricity consumption in California increased only 4.75 percent in
2000 from 1999, a sharp contrast to claims of industry representatives, who
have repeatedly relied on isolated, loose or selective comparisons that make
growth appear as high as 20 percent. In fact, the single greatest hour of
electricity usage in 2000 was actually lower than any peak demand period in
1999 or 1998.
-- Average peak demand -- the average of the highest hour of electricity
usage for each day -- increased only 4.79 percent from 1999 to 2000. Even
during the months of May to September in 2000, when the greatest spikes in
electricity usage occur, demand growth was only 8.31 percent higher than the
same period the year before.
-- More than 30 days of critical power shortage warnings, so-called Stage 3
emergencies, and two days of blackouts this year occurred at times of
moderate energy use -- levels often below those at which neither warnings nor
blackouts have occurred in the past.
The findings appear to buttress suspicions that the "skyrocketing demand"
explanation for rising energy prices is a cover for what is really happening
--
that power companies have simply started charging more for an essential
commodity, regardless of whether it is in short supply.
Presented with The Chronicle's findings, Gary Ackerman, a representative for
the Western Power Trading Forum, a trade group representing power companies,
said the calculations support the industry position that electricity demand
is growing strong.
"That's pretty healthy growth for California as opposed to the long-term
historical average, which is close to 2 percent," he said. "To me, that's
really strong growth."
Energy demand is certainly on the rise in California -- growth of more than 4
percent is still double what was projected -- and the state has obviously
fallen behind in building power plants.
Even though a recent study found California ranked 47th out of the 50 states
in per-capita energy consumption, the surging demand explanation has become
so accepted that leading officials accept it as gospel. Gov. Gray Davis has
made energy conservation -- 10 percent, at that -- a centerpiece of his
efforts to solve the crisis.
"Energy use is growing," said state Sen. John Burton, D-San Francisco, citing
the growth of Silicon Valley and high-tech operations statewide. "There's
been tremendous growth, whether manufacturing or high tech -- cell phones,
faxes, whatever. The stuff is growing."
Yet the energy industry has been steadfast in its insistence that the
consumer is largely to blame. In testimony and submissions to government
bodies considering prescriptions for the crisis, energy demand growth has
consistently been overstated.
Joe Bob Perkins, the chief operating officer of Houston-based Reliant Energy
Inc., told the U.S. Senate in January that California's growing economy and
high summer temperatures caused electricity use to "surge dramatically" -- a
demand growth of 13 percent.
Richard Wheatley, a spokesman for Reliant, said Perkins' testimony was based
on estimates by the federal Energy Information Administration of monthly
retail electricity sales.
"We do stand by that," Wheatley said. "Unfortunately, it does not track with
ISO data."
The industry-backed Edison Electric Institute said in a report that
electricity demand grew by anywhere from 5 percent to 21 percent during the
spring of 2000, compared with the same period a year earlier.
Russell Tucker, an economist for the institute, said the group's figures were
derived by identifying the single highest hour of electricity demand for each
spring month of 1999 and 2000 and comparing them, finding the May peak rose
21 percent.
Granted, the state Energy Commission uses the same model to determine whether
California has enough plant capacity to meet demand. But the presentation
makes it appear that overall demand, not just the absolute peak, is growing
by 21 percent. When the peak of each day is averaged and compared from year
to year, May's figure was much lower: 12.79 percent.
Also, nowhere did Edison's report note that the peak hour of 2000, a load of
43,784 megawatts on Aug. 16, was actually lower than the peak hours of either
of the previous two years -- 45,884 on July 12, 1999, or 44,406 on Sept.
1, 1998.
The Chronicle analysis of average peak demand showed that no month last year
grew more than June's 15.34 percent, though no blackouts occurred in that
month. May and June were the only months when demand growth exceeded 10
percent, the analysis showed. Most months recorded 4 percent or 5 percent,
and some -- such as September -- were less than 3 percent.
Two months, October and December, had demand levels lower than the year
before -- 4.22 percent less for October, 1.46 percent lower for December.
Mike Florio, a consumer lawyer and board member of the ISO, said that even
growth of less than 5 percent from 1999 to 2000 would seem overstated, since
1999 was a relatively mild weather year and 2000 was a much hotter one. "You
are quite right," Florio said. " 'Skyrocketing' demand is a myth."
MARKET MANIPULATION?
Consumer representatives and some politicians have long suspected that,
rather than dire imbalances between supply and demand, market manipulation is
behind the crisis.
Generators and power marketers adamantly deny this, saying they have done
everything they could to keep the lights on. They say they ran aging,
decrepit plants at higher-than-normal levels last summer to accommodate what
they described as unprecedented demand. They also say that, at great expense,
they delayed much-needed maintenance in order to keep the power flowing.
Their claims have received some support from the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, which said in a report last month that it found no evidence power
companies were using maintenance schedules to manipulate supply. The report,
however, was heavily qualified by the FERC, which said it did not investigate
other forms of manipulation. Moreover, the agency acknowledged that the bulk
of its investigation was conducted by simply calling power plants and
questioning them over the telephone.
The supply side of the energy equation is harder to penetrate, in part
because supply data are confidential. Thus, the question of how blackouts
could have occurred at such low levels of demand in January is hard to
answer. What is clear is that, at times, during the crisis this year, as much
as 12, 000 megawatts of electricity supply have been unavailable for use,
mostly because of unplanned plant outages -- about four times the level
anticipated by the ISO.
Power companies say the old plants they bought were not capable of producing
to the levels sketched out by the ISO and the Energy Commission, and that
everything from low water conditions, emissions limitations and high
temperatures last year caused less energy to be available than was
anticipated.
But others suggest that what began as a shortage caused by a withholding of
supply to drive up price has turned into one caused by withholdings out of
fear of not being paid.
What did go up, unquestionably, were wholesale electricity prices.
While average electricity usage during the heaviest hours last year increased
by less than 5 percent, prices charged by power companies to the utilities
that deliver juice to consumers increased more than 289 percent.
In June, the cost of a megawatt hour increased more than fivefold, going from
the 1999 level of $30.53 to $170.60. In October, prices doubled over the same
period a year earlier, going from $53.47 to $111.04. And in December --
despite a 1.46 percent decline in electricity usage from the previous
December -- peak wholesale electricity prices hit $425.59. They'd been $31.88
one year before.
Then the pace of price increases began to accelerate within the last six
months of 2000. Overall, average peak usage during December was about 31,200
megawatts, about a fifth lower than it was in August. Average prices in
December? They just about doubled, to $425 a megawatt hour.
The companies' explanation for rising prices despite falling demand was that
more and more plants had to be taken offline for repairs, decreasing supply.
Even given the high number of inoperable plants, questions remain about why
the existing supply could not cover demand.
On the blackout days of Jan. 17 and 18 fewer plants were offline -- and more
electricity was available -- than on days when the state managed to squeeze
by without turning out the lights.
Even today, with Stage 3 alerts having faded away, at least temporarily,
demand levels remain more or less the same as when California was in a
constant state of emergency. Moreover, the lists of offline plants are as
long as ever.
AMPLE POWER SHOULD EXIST
The Energy Commission and the ISO have concluded that California's power
plants are capable of generating more than 45,000 megawatts of electricity.
That means that even with plant repair outages, low water levels decreasing
hydraulic generation, air-pollution rules and other environmental
constraints, the power companies should be able to accommodate all but the
most extreme spikes in demand.
According to industry data obtained by The Chronicle, the Western Systems
Coordinating Council, a government-backed trade group in Salt Lake City,
concluded California would have considerable surpluses throughout 2000,
including margins as high as 39 percent in December, based on data provided
to it by the ISO. Even under low water conditions, the ISO reported, the
state would have total power resources of 47,532 megawatts in that month. Yet
unplanned outages were far higher, and the system began to crash that month
and into this year, at far lower levels of demand.
"Clearly," Florio said, "we should not be having a shortage at 2 a.m. on
Christmas Eve, when the only person awake is Santa Claus."
Chronicle Database Editor Erin McCormick assisted in data analysis for this
report. Chronicle editorial assistant Claire Smith assisted in data
collection for this report. / E-mail Christian Berthelsen at
cberthelsen@sfchronicle.com and Scott Winokur at s
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1


Tana,
 Thank you for your prompt response.  Have a great time with your group and
see you in San Antonio!!!!

Thanks, Kim

	Tana Jones
	04/27/2001 02:48 PM

		 To: Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Dinner on Wednesday, May 2, 2001, San Antonio Legal Conference

The Swap Group has already made plans for a dinner on Wednesday or I would
love to join you.  Thanks for inviting me!

	Kimberlee A Bennick
	04/27/2001 02:41 PM

		 To: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Limor Nissan/ENRON@enronXgate, Laurie
Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos
Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dinner on Wednesday, May 2, 2001, San Antonio Legal Conference

Sent for Bob Walker

A group of us have decided to gather for dinner on the Wednesday night before
the legal conference and wish to extend an invitation for you to join us for
good food and fellowship and maybe a few drinks.  We have reservations for
8:00 pm at Delores Del Rio, which is a small Italian restaurant on the
river.  They have excellent food and live Jazz music.  Very small and quaint
little place and away from the crush of the party places on the river.

I will need to give a final head count to the restaurant on Wednesday.  If
you can join us, or know of anyone who would like to, please let me know and
I will get directions, or we can all walk over from the hotel.  It is a very
short walk.

Please let me know if you can attend.

Thanks,

Bob.


Bob,

Thank you for your reply.  I know you are doubly busy with your being on the
road this week, just prior to a vacation.  Your answer below is perfect!
Bob, you and your team have been very supportive of our efforts to assist EBS
with BMC, and you have done all that we could have asked!  I wanted you to
know that we really appreciate your support (I especially do, as a "late
arrival" to this situation)!  Thank you again for all of the help!

Jeff

	Bob McAuliffe/ENRON@enronXgate
	12/05/2000 06:56 PM

		 To: Jeff Youngflesh/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Randy Matson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Douglas
Cummins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Rub/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: RE: Update

Jeff,

Assuming that either Randy or Doug were to decide that BMC was a viable
solution for their areas of responsibility, we would certainly support
purchasing the appropriate products from BMC.

Bob.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Youngflesh, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 5:34 PM
To: McAuliffe, Bob
Cc: Matson, Randy; Smith, Bruce; Cummins, Douglas
Subject: Update

Bob,

I understand from Thais that you're on the road for Enron, but soon you'll be
"on the road for Bob" - a well-deserved vacation coming up!  In light of your
impending vacation, I wanted to do a quick follow-up check.

If we could somehow, without causing an undesirable state in your
organization, facilitate the ability to purchase BMC solution product for Net
Works, would you support that?

I have spoken with Bruce Smith, Randy Matson, and Doug Cummins in followup
calls from the November 17th meeting in EB 22C1.  IF Randy and Doug were
likely to make a pro-BMC decision (instead of for a competitor's product),
and IF there was a way to painlessly (for Net Works) enable the funds to
become available to make a purchase of BMC product (by Net Works), would that
be something you would support?  I am searching for a way to help EBS without
impacting Net Works in any negative way...but ultimately, I will abide
whatever you demand here.

I hope to hear from you, either by telephone/voicemail, or e-mail; if you
could do so prior to your vacation.

Thank you again for your help,

Jeff Youngflesh

Jeff Youngflesh
Director, Business Development
Global Strategic Sourcing
Enron Corp.
333 Clay Street, 11th Floor
Houston, TX 77002
t:  713-345-5968
f:  713-646-2450
c:  713-410-6716


here's the political decision helper -
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000 01:43 PM -----

	"CAVALIER,D. MD" <LAB-DSC@womans.com>
	11/03/2000 09:08 AM

		 To: "'Sara Shackleton'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Check out this page at SpeakOut.com!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: OGDEN,B.W. MD
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 8:45 AM
> To: CAVALIER,D. MD
> Subject: FW: Check out this page at SpeakOut.com!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SCHELIN,BRETT L
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 8:36 AM
> To: OGDEN,B.W. MD; WELLS,CHERYL F
> Subject: FW: Check out this page at SpeakOut.com!
>
> This is the page I mentioned to you yesterday.  It ask for your opinion
> regarding issues and which candidate matches your views.  Kind of fun,
> kind of interesting.
>
> Brett Schelin
> Phone: (225)924-8271
> Fax: (225)924-8616
> e-mail: labbls@womans.com
>
>
> http://www.speakout.com/SelectSmart/Default.asp
>
> SpeakOut.com


definately, you havent been bugging me, thur or fri would be best for me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:36 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I'm sorry, and I know I have probably been bugging you, but Ive been worried about you.  Wanna go have a drink this week?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:34 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

nope ive just been busy and a little cranky

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:32 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

so are you ignoring me?


Awhile back, Jim Ebling had informed me that you  were representing Enron to
clean up a few of their power projects.? Please  review my website at:?
www.josephrichards.com
?
Thanks


Hi Anita,

 How are you?  I arrived yesterday late morning from the London Gatwick
airport.  Due to rush hour traffic, etc. it took a while to get into the city
to the hotel.

 Also, due to May Day (May 1st) protests/riots, etc., the hotel management
strongly recommended that we remain in the hotel.

 However, I am in the office today.  I can be reached via email or via
telephone at 44 (0) 207 783 5647.

Take care,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  DuPont, Anita
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 5:23 PM
To: mmumford@enron.com
Cc: Mack, Iris; Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject: I. M. Mack 30Apr-15May **Plse Review for Accuracy**   AGENT CE/CE
BOOKING REF X7W882    MACK/IRIS EB 1972 ENRON CORP
Importance: High

See Iris's itinerary below.  I thought her initial plan was to land this
morning and come in to Enron House in early afternoon.  See itinerary for
phone number of hotel.  Let me know if I can help in any
other way.  Thanks.  Anita

SERVICE                 DATE    FROM             TO               DEPART
ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES    30 APR   HOUSTON TX       LONDON GATWICK  350P
655A
CO 34      J           MON     G.BUSH IAH  GATWICK                   01 MAY
                               TERMINAL DOM     TERMINAL S
DINNER/SNACK                  NON STOP
 RESERVATION CONFIRMED         9:05 DURATION
VEGETARIAN MEAL, NON-DAIRY CONFIRMED
AIRCRAFT: BOEING 777-200/300

HOTEL               30 APR  ATHENAEUM HOTEL AND APARTMENTS
                       11 MAY  116 PICCADILLY
                              LONDON ENGLAND, W1V 0BJ
                              UNITED KINGDOM
                              TELEPHONE: 44-(0)-207-499-3464
                              FAX: 44-(0)-207-493-1860
                              CONFIRMATION: CLAIRE25APR
                                              RATE: RAC GBP 270.00 PER NIGHT
                              GUARANTEE GIVEN
                              PREREG ACTUAL ARR 1MAY 655AM APARTMENT
                 TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL BY 6PM 24HRS PRIOR

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES   11 MAY   LONDON GATWICK  HOUSTON TX       1200N
415P
CO 5       J           FRI     GATWICK          G.BUSH iah
                               TERMINAL S       TERMINAL DOM
 LUNCH/SNACK                   NON STOP
RESERVATION CONFIRMED         10:15 DURATION
  VEGETARIAN MEAL, NON-DAIRY CONFIRMED
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 777-200/300


Did you want me to confirm down on this meter  starting today.  (POPs).
Deal is at 3,000 and pathed at 0.
meter 1418 - thanks - Julie


----- Original Message -----
From: patbelle <patbelle@mail.ev1.net>
To: <dpriese@worldnet.att.net>; <marnold2@houston.rr.com>;
<Gilles.RICHARD5@wanadoo.fr>; <ian@zellweger.freeserve.co.uk>;
<lanceneidig@mail.glazierfoods.com>; <tippy_4DA@hotmail.com>;
<FredericREBIERE@aol.com>; <brebiere@hn.ozemail.com.au>;
<DMRickards@MarathonOil.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: FWD: Fw: FW: Dr. Seuss (Don't delete

> -
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  FW: Dr. Seuss (Don't delete)
> >  Just do this!
> >  My best friend just did this, this morning, wished for her
>
> promotion and
> >just got a call and she got it.
> >  The last time I sent this exact e-mail out, I got a new job and
>
> now I'm
> >superstitious.
> >
> >  Start thinking something you really really want, because this
>
> is
> >astounding... the person that sent
> >  this to me said their wish came true 10 mins after they read
>
> the mail so
> >I thought what the heck.
> >
> >
> >        ******
> >        ******
> >        ******
> >        ******
> >     **********
> >         (,)(,)
> >           u
> >        *.....*
> >
> >
> >  You have just been visited by Dr.Suess's Cat in the
> >   Hat. He will grant you one wish.
> >   Make your wish when the count down is over.
> >
> >
> >  10..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  9..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  8..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  7..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  6..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  5..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  4..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  3..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  2..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  1..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  MAKE A WISH
> >
> >   Send this to 10 people within the hour you read this.
> >   If you do, your wish will come true.
> >
> >  If you don't, it will become the opposite.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
>
> _______
> >This message has been checked for all known viruses, by Star
>
> Internet,
> >delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre.
> >For further information visit:
> >http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Sent via the EV1 webmail system at mail.ev1.net
>
>
>
>
>


Spring 2001 Faculty,

Attached is the Spring 2001 Module and Calendar Schedules for your
review.  Please note the Jones Graduate School is not following the
traditional University Calendar for Spring Break this year.  If you have
any questions please contact me.

Kathy

Kathy M. Spradling
MBA Program Coordinator
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street, MS 531
Houston, Texas  77005-1892
Phone:  (713) 348-3313
Fax:  (713) 348-5251
Email:  spradlin@rice.edu
http://www.rice.edu/jgs
E-mail:  spradlin@rice.edu
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgs/
 - Spring Module 2001 Sch.doc
 - Spring Module 2001 Cal.doc


A look at some of the tech leads being pursued for the
MDU/hospitality/education sectors


I will have to think about it over the weekend and let you know after the 1st.  Thanks for your help.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:03 AM
To:	Frank, Carole
Subject:	Sorry

I know I owe you some names and phone numbers.  What things would you be interested in?  Let me know.

DG


Attached, please find the amended version of SBX 27 relating to direct
access which should be heard in Senate Appropriations on May 14.

http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx1_27_bill_20010424_amended
_sen.pdf


Reservation status has changed. Details of the reservation are listed below:
ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30338
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = FOURCORNERS
SINK = PNPK
CAPACITY = 25
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 05/08/2002
STOP_TIME = 05/08/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 1.95
OFFER_PRICE = 1.95
BID_PRICE = 1.95
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = CONFIRMED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = lisa.gang@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 05/07/2002

TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 05/07/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = For information, call (503)464-5070.
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0


Please plan to attend the relocated meeting to discuss the supply of gas to
Ponderosa Energy (Conhusker) on Thursday July 13 from 3:00 to 4:00 in
conference room 30C2. Call John Griffith @ ext. 36247 with questions.


Kal will be finishing mine shortly. Please be prepared to do the 3 hole punch thing 20 times. Thanks.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Spiller, Tina
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 1:02 PM
To:	Bartlett, Jeff; Beck, Sally; Bibi, Philippe A.; Gros, Thomas D.; Hotte, Steve; Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec; Kanellopoulos, Drew; Palmer, Mark S.; Perlman, Beth; Raghavan, Suresh; Roper, Kerry; Rub, Jenny; Shelby, Rex; Taylor, Mark; Wax, Brandon; Webb, Jay; Zipper, Andy
Cc:	McCurley, Peggy; Flores-Cuellar, Brenda; Houser, Rita; Costello, Lisa; Guerrero, Alisha; Fuentes, Irma; Westbrook, Cherylene R.; Escamilla, Grisela; Jones, Susan; Cromwell, Sheri L.; Keiser, Holly; Weatherstone, Mary; Cannon, Lydia
Subject:	ENW Management Offsite - Tomorrow

REMINDER --

Opening comments start promptly at 8:00 a.m., so please allow plenty of time to arrive at the Houstonian, park and have breakfast.  The Houstonian is located at 111 North Post Oak Boulevard, phone 713-680-2626.  Our meeting will be held in the Cottonwood Room.

Dress code for the day is casual.

If you haven't turned in your presentation yet, please bring 20 copies to the meeting, 3-hole punched at the top.  You will also have to bring your presentation on a CD so I can load it on the laptop.

Tina Spiller
Assistant to Greg Piper
Chief Operating Officer
Enron Net Works LLC
Office 713.853.5746
tina.spiller@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2000 11:51
AM ---------------------------

"Vanessa Wilson" <VWILSON@skadden.com> on 03/30/2000 11:16:35 AM
To: allan.janna@enron.com, joana.ryan@enron.com
cc: rgay@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, MTHURBER@mail5.allegro.net
Subject: Fwd: GE Letter Agreement

As requested, attached please find the e-mail I sent to Rob Gay to which the
current draft of the Letter Agreement with GEII is attached and which briefly
summarizes the indemnity issue we have been discussing.

If you have any questions or would like to discuss the attached further,
please feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.

------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail
and any printout thereof.
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:36:15 -0500
From: "Vanessa Wilson" <VWILSON@skadden.com>
Cc: MTHURBER@skadden.com
Subject: GE Letter Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_4E179871.E8897E40"

Rob,

Attached please find the current draft of the Letter Agreement (32581.7),
including Attachment 8 (32573.7) which sets forth various provisions to be
included in the Purchase Agreement.  Article 20 regarding indemnification is
included in Attachment 8.

As we discussed, West LB has some concerns regarding including language in
Article 20 which GEII requested by which West LB would indemnify GEII for
Enron's acts (in its capacity as Agent).  West LB has suggested they would be
willing to undertake this obligation if they are reimbursed by Enron through
the Acquisition and Development Agreement.  Today, for the first time, West
LB indicated that they may require a cap on this liability for Agent's acts
in the Purchase Agreement.

GEII has requested that West LB undertake this obligation and Enron has
agreed to pursue it with West LB.  In light of this, the language which would
establish West LB's indemnity obligation for the Agent's acts is not included
in the current draft of Attachment 8.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.  As I mentioned, we are
trying to finalize the Letter Agreement with GEII very shortly.  I apologize
for any confusion and look forward to working with you on this matter.  If
you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please
feel free to contact me at 713-655-5102.

Thanks,
Vanessa.

 - 32581_7.doc
 - 32573_7.doc
 - 32614_2.xls


-----Original Message-----
From:  "Cagle, Donna" <DCAGLE@mariner-energy.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Cagle+2C+20Donna+22+20+3CDCAGLE+40mariner-energy+2Ecom+3
E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:43 PM
To: Edison, Deborah J.
Cc: Melendrez, Jesus
Subject: Mariner Management Meeting Minutes

 <<6-6-01.doc>>  <<SUMMARY.xls>>

Donna M. Cagle
Executive Administrator to President & CEO
Mariner Energy, Inc.
580 WestLake Park Blvd., Suite 1300
Houston, TX  77079
281/584-5511 (phone)     281/584-5515 (fax)
dcagle@mariner-energy.com

 - 6-6-01.doc
 - SUMMARY.xls


EXEC  [dbo].[sp_AB_GetGenerationData_RealTime]
	@GenCode 	= 'sd3'	,
 	@StartDate 	= '1 MAY 2001' 		,
	@EndDate  	= '10 MAY 2001'


Jeff,

Seth Spalding here, director of research at epoch partners. We met via
satellite this january when you presented at CE unterberg towbins conference
in New York. I have since moved from ceut to epoch partners. In any case, I
ran across a company, backed by bill tai at redpoint ventures, that has some
excellent distributed IP technology used to bring SS7 like functionality to
IP networks. I thought you or someone at enron might be interested in
speaking with them in light of your bandwidth exchange plans. The company is
called eyefrog, and has nothing of depth available on their website. If this
would be of interest to you, please let me know and I would be happy to put
you in touch.
Regards,
Seth Spalding
--------------------------------
Seth Spalding
Director, Equity Research
Epoch Partners
415-315-3155
sent via wireless


Good Morning, Vince!

Don't forget that I'll need a column from you for this week's newsletter.

Thank you!

Sam


Here is the answer to the storage charge question. As you recall, the
contract allows for us to request storage.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 07/07/2000 03:54
PM ---------------------------
From: Kathleen Clark@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 07/07/2000 03:15 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: ben.jacoby@enron.com

Subject: ABB Storage Amounts

Kay:

Mike advised the storage charge for the transformers would be:  $1,500 prep &
$500/week for each transformer.

Kathy


Approved.
Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000 03:27 PM
---------------------------

Patti Thompson
02/22/2000 02:24 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Approval to release salary averages to Lisa Cousino

Sally,

Lisa Cousino has requested average salaries for various job levels from HR.
If it is okay to release this information to Lisa, please forward to Norma
with your approval.

Patti


We will make sure it is discussed during the meeting Lynn.

JWB

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 7:37 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John; Hanagriff, Richard
Cc:	January, Steve; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Devon SFS

	Darrell and John, could you two be sure we discuss this afternoon.  I am having
	to work on reviews and will not be able to attend the meeting.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoolcraft, Darrell
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 7:08 AM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John; Hanagriff, Richard
Cc:	January, Steve; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Devon SFS

I don't think that decision has been made.  I think we should be allocating.  This should be discussed today at
the TW afternoon marketing meeting.

ds

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Monday, January 14, 2002 7:04 AM
To:	Schoolcraft, Darrell; Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John
Cc:	January, Steve
Subject:	FW: Devon SFS

	I'm confused?  Are we allocating at this time to be sure the imbalance does not
	grow any more?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanagriff, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:08 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul; Mulligan, Amy
Cc:	Dietz, Rick; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	RE: Devon SFS

that would be one of our options if they don't cash out the balance as of 12/31/01

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:53 PM
To:	Hanagriff, Richard; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul; Mulligan, Amy
Cc:	Dietz, Rick; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	RE: Devon SFS

	If I understand correctly, the scheduled volume is continually higher than the flow?  Why don't
	we allocate this point to minimize the imbalance?  Just a thought?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanagriff, Richard
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:39 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Y'barbo, Paul; Mulligan, Amy
Cc:	Dietz, Rick; Blair, Lynn; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Subject:	Devon SFS

Who is the marketer assigned to Devon SFS Operating?

Devon owed TW $161,292.49 as of 12/31/01 related to oba contract 21749.  There is one point on this contract(Bilbrey 28 Fed 1) which flows about 500 mmbtu per day.  Devon is currently having problems delivering gas into TW which is increasing the imbalance further.

Devon has told Amy that they will possibly cash out but they haven't made a commitment yet.  If Devon doesn't cash out and they do not lower nominations on this point, then we will have to explore other options to get this gas/$$$$.

Amy will continue to follow up with Devon and pursue cashing out.

thanks
Richard


Here are volumes at Keystone Tailgate plant for March 2001

IF ANYONE RECEIVES THIS THAT SHOULD NOT DUE TO PIPELINE CHANGES, PLEASE LET
ME KNOW AND I WILL DELETE FROM
DISTRIBUTION.

Thanks,
Beverly

---------------------- Forwarded by Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 09:18
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Deana Thayer" <Deana.Thayer@dvn.com>
02/20/2001 04:43 PM

To: <Beverly.Beaty@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: March 2000 Avails

I will be happy to also send it email.  I haven't in the past but will do so
from now on.

>>> <Beverly.Beaty@enron.com> 02/20/01 04:16PM >>>
I received a fax from you today regarding the Keystone Plant Tailgate
volumes for March.  I was
wondering if you forward this via e-mail as well.  I don't always receive
faxes on a timely basis and I'm
not sure the appropriate scheduler always receives the information.  Please
let me know.

Thanks,
Beverly
713-853-6357

 - Enron.xls


What is your work phone number?


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 12/20/2000
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	3,310
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,253
Total Life to Date Transactions	539,147

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 12/20/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	2,498	67%
Enron Europe Limited	171	36%
Global Products	77	15%
Enron Metals	564	24%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	54%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,470,930,096
MTD	46,868,017,634
LTD	325,724,856,704
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	3,367,850,166

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	22,015,024,166

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	619
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,042
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,120
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,055


On Tuesday of this week I visited our Helsinki oil trading office. Set out
below are some general observations.

There are about 8 people in the office: 3 traders; 2 logistics people; 1
accounting/risk management person; and a couple secretaries. The office is
headed by Ilkka Kokko, a fairly young Finn. We bought the business in
September of last year.

The basic activity is the purchase of various oil products from Russian
refineries; the transportation of the products by RTC (railroad tank car)
from the refinery to various Baltic ports; the storage of the products at the
ports; and the loading of the products onto vessels for sale in other
markets. Many of the vessels are ocean-going because the products are sold in
non-European markets.

The products are normally purchased on a DAF (delivered at frontier) basis,
which means that title passes to Enron when the RTC crosses the Russian
border. As a result, Enron must arrange for the transport of the products
from the border to the port. This is arranged for us by the company that will
store the products at the port. In other words, the contract we have with the
terminal operator provides for transportation of the products from the
Russian border to the port, the unloading from the RTCs into storage,
storage, the unloading from storage into our vessels and all related customs,
measurement and testing services. We have these deals with about 5 different
Baltic companies.

About 20-30 vessels a month are chartered. About 25-40 product purchases a
month are done, some of which are term deals up to one year. About 300,000
tonnes a month is purchased.

Payments and settlements are done from London. We pay in dollars. The money
is almost always paid into accounts outside of Russia.

Because the business  results in a long position, the Helsinki office hedges
its position by doing deals with Enron's book in London -- no hedging is done
with anyone else. The business experienced some earnings volatility late last
year (had a negative gross margin of $200,000 in November and a positive
gross margin of $350,000 in December). This was largely because the position
wasn't effectively hedged. Hedging is difficult because the hedges are dirty
(due to basis and to product differences) and because it is difficult to
predict the amount of product that will be delivered in any given time period
(due to transportation bottlenecks and to flexibility in the Russians'
delivery obligations to us).

The business historically prepaid for part of the products it purchased. The
financing was historically arranged through a bank that would require a 10%
margin on funds it advanced -- $10 million deposited with the bank would mean
up to $100 million advanced to the Russians. The bank also insisted on having
recourse against Greenergy (the company we acquired) for all amounts
outstanding.

Enron has given Ilkka a $20 million limit on our exposure on these prepaid
deals. Because the bank wants to have recourse against Enron for all amounts
outstanding, the old method of financing these prepaid deals no longer works
given the amount of prepaid financing Ilkka would like to do. Ilkka is trying
to come up with another financing structure where the banks look solely to
the Russians for payment for at least part of the outstanding amount.

Ilkka is also thinking about buying products from the Russians at the
refinery gate. This would require Enron to arrange transportation from the
refinery, not just from the Russian border under the current DAF deals. Ilkka
thinks this will help him control the deliveries more and, as a result,
facilitate his hedging program.

Ilkka is also looking at buying some terminal assets in Estonia. The London
corporate development team is looking at this.

Ilkka confirmed to me that he has never paid any bribes in connection with
the business (even before the acquisition by Enron) and that he understands
the FCPA restrictions.

Robert Quick has made about three visits to the office and is working on a
variety of issues related to this business. Robert, please correct me if I've
made any errors or add something if I've left it out. Thanks!


Sorry, I'm already booked with Volume Management at that time.  I've spoke with George to get the latest decisions on what's happening to the Appalachian deals.  There seems to be a few open items and the effective date for moving these deals is undetermined.  He feels, we should hold off on having this meeting till the actual effective date has been set?  He should be hearing something in the next week or two.

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Wallumrod, Ellen
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:03 PM
To:	Thorne, Judy; Franklin, Mary Theresa; Smith, George F.; Nemec, Gerald; Perlingiere, Debra; Hesse, Lisa; Dickson, Stacy E.
Subject:	ENA Upstream - Appalachian deals
When:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where:	EB21C1


I'm scheduled to fly back to Houston around 745 that night, so it isn't
looking good for me.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lisa Bills                           07/31/2000 12:11 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Rose's Birthday Party

Please join us in celebrating Rose's birthday, which is Friday, on Thursday,
August 3rd at 6:30 pm at Cadillac Bar on Shepperd at I10.

Please let me know if you are able to attend.

Regards,
Lisa


The attached document contains the EPMI average prices for all delivery
points for Sun., March 25, and Mon., March 26. Please let me know if you have
any problems opening the document or reading it. The worksheet should look
identical to the fax I send each day. An additional worksheet shows a detail
of each deal volume and price. I'm in the habit of excluding the counterparty
names (to save time) because I'm the only one who looks at this sheet
normally; but if you'd like me to start e-mailing instead of faxing the
prices I will begin entering the counterparty names as well.

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


Pursuant to your request, attached are the documents distributed for the meeting this morning.

In addition, here are the list of counterparties and assignments so far:

Reliant Energy - Leslie Hansen - (713) 853-6121
Aquila - Jeff Hodge - (713) 853-6911
Dynegy - Harlan Murphy - (713) 345-2679
FPL Energy Marketing - Steve Van Hooser - (713) 853-7238
Florida Power & Light - Steve Van Hooser
Hess - Frank Sayre - (713) 345-7894
Engage Energy - Francisco Pinto-Leite - (713) 345-7942
El Paso - Brent Hendry - (713) 853-7124
BP Amoco - Carol St. Clair - (713) 853-3989
Morgan - Angela Davis (713) 345-8347

As we have additional assignments, I will send them on to you.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cook, Mary
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:20 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	FW: Master Netting

Please do this
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Rick Antonoff" <Rick.Antonoff@cwt.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:37 AM
To:	Cook, Mary
Subject:	Re: Master Netting

I also need the list of counterparties and the Enron personnel assigned to
each one.

Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Rick Antonoff/NY/CWT on 10/30/01 12:35 PM -----

                    Rick Antonoff
                                         To:     "Cook, Mary"
                                         <Mary.Cook@ENRON.com>
                    10/30/01 12:22       cc:
                    PM                   Subject:     Re: Master Netting
                                         (Document link: Rick Antonoff)

It sounds like you handed out things at the meeting besides the form of the
MNA and CA, such as an agenda, checklist, process, etc.  Can you send me
copies of what was handed out?

Rick

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================


Yes I am better thank your.  How are you?  Yes the dogs were good. The dog
tooth fairy made a visit to Geronimo last night as he has lost many teeth.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Opps.  I should add that Mr. Hodge has a free pass to miss this and all other
NW phone calls.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/25/2001 12:06
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
03/25/2001 12:04 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, jkeffer@kslaw.com,
mreurter@kslaw.com, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 200 Team meeting re NW exclusivity

Hi there,

Just confirming a 200 CST Enron team conference call.  Is this going to work
for everyone, with the exception of Carlos, who is now excused?

Kay


Ginger,  I would very much like to participate in the meeting this Thursday.
However, given that it is bid-week, I cannot absolutely guarantee my
attendance.  If it is at all possible for me to include myself with the
caveat that I may have to pull-out last minute I would really appreciate the
opportunity.  Please let me know if this is all right and I will do
everything I can to attend.

	From:  Ginger B Gamble                           04/24/2000 11:01 AM

To: Nicole Alvino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ace Roman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Mauritzen/HOU/EES@EES, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Bennett/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Kolman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shanna
Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle Thompson/HOU/EES@EES, Todd Van
Roten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristina Lund/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Todd Neugebauer/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Otis
Wathington/HOU/EES@EES, Trina Samuel/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy
Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Luis Mena/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Analyst Focus Groups Meeting

The Analyst Program will be holding a meeting focusing on branding for
recruiting brochures, content, website, and marketing materials.  Along with
program management, David Bloom and Michelle Staley from Brecker & Merryman
are hosting a focus group meeting to gather information to assist with this
initiative.  You are invited to participate in this meeting, this Thursday,
April 27 2:00 - 4:00 pm, location 44C1.  Conference call number/connection
can be arranged for those individuals out of the Houston area.  Please let me
know if you are able to participate.

Thank you
Ginger Gamble


please check fees on the following trades,  thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001
08:43 AM ---------------------------
Stephanie Piwetz   02/02/2001 05:32 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: bro fees with Bloomberg

Kate, please verify with traders
tom
deal 512827.01
enron sells merrill
260.00   Q2    2001
25 mws

bloomberg has fee .005   we have zero

bob badeer
deal 512927.01
Enron sells merrill
Q2 2001
250.00

bloomberg has .005 fee, we have zero

if fee
please add

thanks


Clint/Sara-

I read the UBS & CSFB confirmations to find any material differences that
would give one party preferential treatment over the other and came up with
the following differences:

Settlement Notice:  CSFB 15 days
   UBS 10 days

Most Favored Nation's Clause:  UBS has this incorporated in confirm
    CSFB no mention of clause

Sara-I would appreciate it if you can do a quick review of the confirms in a
case I left something out.

Jeff Nogid
Manager
Enron Global Finance
713-853-4782


We have some new procedures for changing deals that affect other books.
Please read and let me know if you have any further questions.  You don't
need to request minibook access individually.  I have, so if needed we can
run them on my machine.  Thanks.
DG    3-9573
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
01:06 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jeffrey C Gossett                           10/20/2000 11:25 AM

To: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dutch
Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Changing Deals

Effective immediately,  if anyone changes any deal for any reason,  they need
to provide a minibook with a before and after of exactly what they did.  This
used to be a common courtesy,  but it looks like we need a stated policy in
place.  You guys will therefore have to get minibook access to calc all books
on a mini-book level from Jeremy.  Please let me know the timing Jeremy gives
for getting the appropriate people mini-book access as soon as possible.  It
is critical that we get this done right away.  I know that this is not a
one-sided issue.  No group is better or more important than any other group.
It is therefore important that we do a better job of communicating across
groups.

Thanks,

Jeff