This is the first analysis of 'Twingate'  that points out the obvious. John Williams exposes the exploitation of an unfortunate incident by two Austin  promoters who are also Democrat activist. The conduct of  the teenage twins is indefensible; Chuy's  conduct is outrageous.

The girls made a silly mistake; Chuy's made a calculated grab for commercial promotion, at best, and engaged in despicable dirty political activity at worst.Chuy's smug press release confirms either or both conclusions.

The twins will pay a price for their conduct. I hope every parent, conservative, and other decent Texans that abhors shameless exploitation of the underage girls, will ensure that Chuy's pays a price for their conduct.

I will not set foot in Chuy's and ask that everyone with a sense of decency join in expressing their outrage at Chuy's despicable conduct. In Texas we have the choice of an abundance of Tex-Mex in less hostile environments.

Jack Rains
Houston

P.S. I urge you to share your thoughts on this subject with your friends and family.

		        HoustonChronicle.com
   HoustonChronicle.com logo    HoustonChronicle.com        Houston4u    personal start page         Pick a section Home Page Business Classifieds Columnists Comics Community Directory Entertainment Features Forums Health Help Inside Story Marketplace Metropolitan Page 1 News Search Archives Site Map Space Sports Travel Weather   Section: Local & State  Section: John Williams: Politics      Current stories in this section:  Williams: The 411 on Chuy's decision to call 911   Taiwan leader's stay in Houston goes peacefully   State candidates jockey for position   Gift for yodeling sets young singer apart from others   Dr Pepper, Tx. celebrates drink plant's 110th   Fan access is a big hit for Enron   3-alarm fire guts Atascocita church   2 hospitalized after pickup nearly runs down officers   Powerboat racer Carmody killed in accident   Legislators requesting vet school   Attorney general intervenes in lawsuit against DNA bank   State seeks to regulate Web doctors, druggists   Pair riding to 30 big-league parks for charity   Challenger ekes out win in Montgomery runoff   Tour boats operator faces charges   4th wildfire burns near Fort Davis   Mars conquers the evening skies this month   Track coach Jack Petty dies   Crime Stoppers: Five men sought in shooting   Houston's international scene   Area briefs        	    Printer-friendly format      June 4, 2001, 12:54AM  The 411 on Chuy's decision to call 911   By JOHN WILLIAMS  Copyright 2001 Houston Chronicle   The first call from Chuy's restaurant at 10:45 p.m. Tuesday went to the 911 dispatcher in Austin.   The emergency? Two underage women wanted alcoholic beverages. One had an I.D. of another person old enough to drink.   It may be the first time a restaurant has considered underage drinking worthy of an emergency call in the home of the state's biggest university, said Becky Stewart, emergency services director for the Capital Area Planning Council. CAPCO manages Austin's regional 911 system.   But the two in question had familiar names. They were Jenna and Barbara Bush, the president's 19-year-old twin daughters.   Perhaps the call is understandable. No big-dollar restaurant wants to risk its liquor license by serving alcohol to someone under 21.   Tip for newsmen questionable  The second call from Chuy's management, however, is harder to defend.  Chuy's tipped the Austin American-Statesman to the scoop about the president's partying scofflaws. Amid deadline pressure and ethical questions, the newspaper didn't print a report until Thursday.   By then, the Bush family affair, rightly or wrongly, was everybody's business. It went international. Chuy's was mentioned in newspapers worldwide.   "That can't be bad for business," mused an Austin political consultant and frequent Chuy's diner.   The success story of the restaurant chain may shed a little more light.   Chuy's was started by Michael Young and John Zapp in a city that loves its Mexican food. Young has been the main mover and shaker, helping expand the restaurant chain to Houston, Dallas, Arlington and San Antonio, and starting other profitable businesses.   Described by one friend as having a Willie Nelson grin, Young is a laid-back Austin denizen and minor Democratic player in Travis County politics.   Young has strong opinions and occasionally attends party fund-raisers, though acquaintances said he has not taken front-line positions on any major issues.   He has an amazing ability to get attention for his restaurant.   When Kenneth Starr was investigating the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky affair, Chuy's sold more than 1,000 T-shirts with a cartoon of Clinton shaking his finger and saying, "I did not have Tex-Mex with that woman."   Young also appeared for free in a Southwest Airlines commercial with the airline's legendary boss, Herb Kelleher. Young got the gig, which garnered free publicity for his restaurants, through adman Roy Spence, a friend and business partner who runs in Democratic circles.   Last year, Spence and Young joined others to create Glazing Saddles Ltd., which owns the Krispy Kreme doughnut shops in Austin and San Antonio.   "I like Michael because he has built a culture where his people do the right thing, they are a big family," Spence said. "His people serve the customers right, they prepare the food right, they take care of business right."   Twins' actions hard to explain  Was it right to dial 911? Many eateries might have refused to serve the Bush daughters and left it at that.   The twins' behavior is likewise hard to defend or explain. The incident came two weeks after Jenna Bush made national headlines when she pleaded no contest to an earlier underage drinking charge. Did they believe no one in Austin would recognize them, or notice the Secret Service agents nearby?   The White House has described the incidents as private family matters. If the twins' mother, first lady Laura Bush, and grandmother, former first lady Barbara Bush, decide to apply a dose of old-fashioned tough love, it couldn't be any more painful than Thursday's front-page headline in the New York Post: "Jenna and Tonic. Bush daughter in new booze incident as twin sister watched."   For Chuy's, it's a different matter. Perhaps the restaurant management, with its Democratic ties, is privately reveling in the Republican first family's public embarrassment.   The restaurant did not return calls about its decision to publicize the incident.   But Thursday afternoon, the restaurant released a statement -- or more precisely, an understatement: "We sincerely regret any inconvenience this has caused the first family."      John Williams' e-mail address is john.williams@chron.com .  Return to top          	  Click on banner for more information                             Change Your Mind! Change Your Life! section C, page 3


These two deals were input as not to be confirmed.  They look like they
should be confimed to me.  If they do not need to be confirmed, please put
the reason in the comments in deal entry.  Otherwise, please change to be
confirmed and let me know.

Thanks!


-----Original Message-----
From: Seabron Adamson [mailto:seabron.adamson@frontiereconomics.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:21 AM
To: Novosel, Sarah
Subject: RTO cost-benefit thoughts

Sarah:

Sorry, I was out of the office much of yesterday. Please find attached my
thoughts on the RTO CBA. I should be in much of the afternoon today
(although I am interviewing a potential hire from 3-4 p.m.) if you wish to
discuss.

Seab

This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.

Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph:  (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com

www.frontier-economics.com


I know Ben wants us to substitute the one signed by the other guy.  I'll take
care of it.

	From:  Rebecca Walker                           12/19/2000 09:17 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Signed Change Notice - LM6000 Contract

Kay

Can you please fax Karla Hesketh at ABB a copy of the signed change order?  I
have a copy of the change order with Mike Sandridge's signature on it, but
I'm not sure which signature page we're using as the final official document
and therefore which version I should fax to Karla.

Thanks,
Rebecca
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron on 12/19/2000
09:11 AM ---------------------------

karla.hesketh@ustra.mail.abb.com on 12/19/2000 08:14:22 AM
To: rebecca.walker@enron.com
cc: michael.o.sandridge@ustra.mail.abb.com

Subject: Signed Change Notice - LM6000 Contract

Hi  Rebecca,

By any chance did Ben leave a copy of the signed contract change order with
you?
If so could you fax a copy to me at 713-821-3526.

Thank you,
Karla

Karla Hesketh\ABB
Ph: 713-821-4016, Fx: 713-821-3526


We agree with these numbers.

---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities on
02/06/2001
11:51 AM ---------------------------

kponton@duke-energy.com on 02/06/2001 11:24:08 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU
cc:
Subject:  2/5/01 GAS FLOW DAY

Teco Tap       NOMS = 32,500 ; ACTUAL FLOW = 34,426 MCF,      35,631 MMBTU's


Good!  I thought I just had a checkup with Bikesport shortly before I stopped
riding.  I was just a little afraid I might need grease.

	"Patti Young" <pyoung@cliverunnells.com>
	03/06/2001 02:46 PM

		 To: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Monday

Hey, FYI,

I took your bike by Bikesport on Saturday and was going to leave it and the
guy looked at it on the spot and said it looked to be in great condition.
He aired up the tires and all I need to do is get on it and ride it!!!

Thanks again.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:10 AM
To: pyoung@cliverunnells.com
Subject: Re: Monday

Offer still good.  How goes things with the new beau?  Also, thanks for the
cooked meats.  They were delicious!

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@cliverun        To:     "Tana Jones"
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    nells.com>              cc:
                                            Subject:     Monday
                    02/26/2001 12:08
                    PM

Morning, Glory,

Hope you are doing well and had a good weekend.

I am still considering the MS 150 and wanted to know if your offer is still
good for borrowing your bicycle.  If you have changed your mind, it is no
big deal.  Promise!

Patti


Dear Vince,

Thank you for your prompt response.  I do realize
that the A&A Program has finished accepting
candidates for this summer; I was inquiring about
the possibility of hiring on an individual basis.

Again, I greatly appreciate your time.  I look
forward to seeing you soon!

Regards,
Van


Hello everyone.  I've contacted you all because Regulatory Affairs (Becky and I) are attempting to stop sending you so much paper.  Our goal is to still keep you all informed but in a more effective, efficient, and timely manner.  This is where Livelink comes in.  Livelink is a web-based tool that you all will be able to enter from the Govt.Affairs homepage.  In Livelink, there will be the filings, maps, rate increases, etc. that we usually send you via interoffice mail.  In addition, the files from the file room will eventually be added.

Livelink is only going to be as successful as what's put into it.  This is where you and your group comes into play.  Becky and I don't want to put "junk" into it.  We want what's relevant to you and your team.  Of course, this is all relative.  What's important to one person and/or group is not going to be high priority to another.

We will have a meeting Wednesday, the 17th to meet and discuss what's in livelink and look to you all for your valuable input on what you would like to see that's relevant to your team.  Please reply to the invite and/or send comments.

Thanks,

Melinda


Attached is a draft of the response to Bridgeline issue memo concerning
various issues in the Contribution Agreement.  Please review and provide any
comments you may have.  Thanks.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 1, 2000
GOVERNOR DAVIS RESPONDS TO FERC WITH INITIATIVES ON ELECTRICITY PRICES,
SUPPLY
SACRAMENTO - Responding to a draft proposal by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC), Governor Gray Davis today announced several initiatives
to ensure reliable and affordable electricity in California.
In a letter to the federal regulators, the Governor outlined a variety of
regulatory and legislative actions to keep the state,s electricity prices at
the lowest reasonable cost. They include innovative measures to encourage
the siting of power plants in compliance with the state,s environmental
laws, restructuring the state,s power-buying agencies to eliminate conflicts
of interests, and promoting energy conservation and voluntary cutbacks by
larger users during periods of high electricity demand.
"If you do your job of protecting consumers by rectifying the wholesale
markets, the steps I have to take can be transitional in nature and limited
in scope," wrote Gov. Davis, who also reiterated his call to FERC to order
retroactive refunds to San Diego and Orange County consumers, and to impose
price caps on the price of wholesale electricity. "I cannot in good
conscience, however, forego any measure that would serve to protect the
people of California until I am satisfied that the sellers in the wholesale
markets will not victimize Californians again."
Governor Davis, who inherited the problems of deregulation as a result of
legislation signed by Governor Pete Wilson in 1996, said that "The free
market applied to electricity can work, but only if market conditions allow
for real competition, and if all parties act responsibly." The Governor
added "Even though FERC had recently concluded that California,s market was
+dysfunctional,, its draft proposal fails to include measures to stop
out-of-state electrical generators from price gouging, and would lead to
higher prices next summer."
The Governor,s proposals include:
Introducing legislation to dramatically change the membership of the ISO and
PX, eliminating members of the board that have what he called "inherent
conflicts of interest" and replacing them with independent members;
Seeking legislation that will allow new approaches - such as emissions
credit trading - to aid in the siting of new power plants;
Calling on the state,s Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to promote
distributed generation and co-generation;
Accelerating voluntary efforts by the private sector as well as state
agencies to reduce their energy use during peak periods;
Expanding "forward contracting" by utilities that would allow multi-year
contracts to reduce price volatility and ensure reliability;
Asking the PUC to expedite its investigation of the state,s electricity
demand reduction programs for commercial users, and adopt new programs to
allow voluntary interruptions that will allow the reduction of electricity
use during peak power periods;
Reviewing new measures to coordinate power-plant maintenance and operating
activities;
Requiring utilities to retain their existing generation facilities instead
of selling them off at least until the market becomes competitive; and
Calling on the PUC and California Energy Commission (CEC) to study providing
"real time price signals" (such as metering) to large energy users to reduce
energy use.
Governor Davis noted that in the decade prior to his administration, no
power plants were built in the state. But since April 1999, six power plants
representing 4,700 MW of new generation have been approved. Twenty more
applications are under review and 11 more are in the pipeline.
"This represents a significant change in policy and performance and responds
to the fact that we must increase supply as rapidly as possible without
abrogating our commitment to state and federal public health and
environmental protection," he said.
The Governor,s initiatives announced today reflects his commitment to FERC
Chairman James Hoecker at a hearing last month in San Diego to provide input
into FERC,s final order on the California electricity market. That decision
could come as early as December 13, 2000.
The Governor will continue to meet with legislative leaders, consumer
groups, and other interested parties to discuss additional options. He said
a more complete plan cannot be developed until FERC,s final order has been
announced and analyzed.

Please see attached letter. <hoecker121.html>
# # #

GOVERNOR GRAY DAVIS ? SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 ? (916) 445-2841

December 1, 2000
Honorable James Hoecker
Chairman
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20426
Dear Chairman Hoecker:
I told you on November 14 in San Diego that, by December 1, I would respond
to your plan with my suggestions to protect the interests of the people and
businesses of California by providing reliable electricity supplies at the
lowest reasonable cost. Obviously, a complete plan by the State of
California must await your review of my suggested changes to your proposed
order, and final action on that order on December 13. This letter outlines
the first steps toward a plan that my administration is developing based on
extensive, ongoing discussions with legislative leaders, consumers,
business, utilities, generators, environmentalists, labor, agricultural
interests and other California stakeholders.
This emerging plan will indicate to you that I am prepared to act with the
concurrence of the Legislature in California to fulfill our obligations to
assure reliable service at reasonable costs to the consumer.
The free market applied to electricity can work, but only if market
conditions allow for real competition, and if all parties act responsibly.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has found that the wholesale
market in California is dysfunctional and that the wholesale prices charged
by generators in your jurisdiction are unjust and unreasonable.
For that reason, I renew my call for the FERC to undertake the actions that
are critical -- and clearly within your jurisdiction -- to order retroactive
refunds to the consumers who have been harmed this year, and to establish
hard price and bid caps that will protect consumers until the energy
marketplace becomes truly competitive. I do not believe that your proposed
$150/MW clearing price limit will provide any real protection. I again ask
you to impose real price and bid caps in the $100/MW range on a transitional
basis over the next 36 months.
If you do your job of protecting consumers by rectifying the wholesale
markets, the steps I have to take can be transitional in nature and limited
in scope. I cannot in good conscience, however, forego any measure that
would serve to protect the people of California until I am satisfied that
the sellers in the wholesale markets will not victimize Californians again.
Since our meeting in San Diego, several things have occurred which influence
my current thinking.
On November 20, 2000 the California Energy Commission (CEC) published the
results of a detailed bottom-up study of available electricity supply for
2001. It shows that -- taking into account expected load growth, firm and
dynamically scheduled imports, and new supply already under construction or
under contract -- California should be able to avoid emergencies if supplies
are properly managed and scheduled. This presumes, of course, no gaming or
withholding by sellers in wholesale markets and an absence of panic buying.
But the CEC study also shows that supplies are sufficiently tight that
market power will exist and will need to be mitigated during periods of high
demand. The same opportunity for wholesale price gouging through the
exercise of market power and withholding that existed in summer 2000 will
exist in 2001. You must take decisive action to preclude such behavior.
During the week of November 13-19, while you and regulatory commissioners
from around the country were in San Diego, California was subjected to
several Stage 2 Alerts, reflecting severe shortages of generation, even
though these are the lowest load months of the year. Prices were
astronomical. More than 12,000 megawatts of generation were off-line at the
same time, including over 5,000 megawatts for "unscheduled outages." I will
recommend steps to assure that existing resources in California are
available to meet California,s local energy needs, and that information and
the authority necessary to prevent a recurrence of such events are available
to state and local officials.
On November 22 the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and
Electricity Oversight Board (EOB) filed comments with you that summarize the
current status of their ongoing investigations. They confirm the conclusions
of the independent market monitors that California has been victimized by
the exercise of market power by merchant generators and marketers during
summer and fall 2000. The state agencies have been hampered in their
investigations by the refusal of merchant generators to provide information
that will both assist in the understanding of last summer,s prices and in
the fashioning of remedies to assure that we are not victimized again. I
urge you to compel the necessary disclosure of information to complete these
investigations.
On November 21 the CPUC issued an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the
proposal by PG&E to move its hydroelectric facilities out of the regulated
utility. The EIR concludes that such a project would cause significant
unmitigated harm to the environment and recommends retention as the
preferred alternative. This suggests that California,s course of generation
divestiture by utilities may be slowed or stopped.
With these events as background, I want to describe the steps I have taken
and plan to take to begin to address the energy problems in California.
Increase Supply and Expand Infrastructure
During the 10 years preceding my administration, virtually no power plants
were built in California.
Since April 1999, six power plants representing 4,700 MW of new generation
have been approved by the CEC. Five of these plants are under construction
and the sixth will begin construction no later than April 2001. Twenty more
applicants have completed pre-filing and have active applications under
review by the commission staff. Eleven more applications are in the
pre-filing stage.
This represents a significant change in policy and performance and responds
to the fact that we must increase supply as rapidly as possible without
abrogating our commitment to state and federal public health and
environmental protection.
Much has been made about the difficulty of siting and permitting generation
in California. With enactment of AB 970 and the creation of the Governor,s
Clean Energy Green Team this September, California has aggressively
committed itself to continue to accelerate the siting and permitting of
generation and to coordinate local, state and federal government agency
review and action.
Federal and state air quality requirements present unique challenges to the
construction and operation of new power plants. Through the Green Team, we
are developing new and creative approaches to meet these challenges, working
with local air quality districts, the California Air Resources Board and the
United States Environmental Protection Agency. These might, for example,
expand upon the case of the proposed Otay Mesa power plant, where mobile
emissions credits are being used to offset stationary source emissions that
will be generated by the new facility. If necessary, I will seek legislation
to enable these new approaches.
I am also calling on the CPUC to aggressively reduce barriers and to
otherwise encourage the locating of distributed generation and co-generation
where it is viable, cost effective and environmentally sound. The CPUC has
already initiated action that will provide a forum for expediting
certificates for transmission facilities, including environmental review.
Finally, I believe it is important to assure that all supplies of
electricity are available when emergency conditions exist, to avoid
interruptions such as those experienced last summer and as recently as last
week. Suggestions we are considering for achieving this include new means of
coordinating power-plant maintenance and operations activities.
Forward Contracting by Utilities
Many parties, including the FERC, have recommended expanding the use of
forward contracting by the utilities including multi-year bi-lateral
contracts as a way of reducing exposure to volatile spot market prices. The
contracts, as a part of a larger utility energy portfolio, represent an
important tool to moderate price volatility and ensure reliability. I am
asking the CPUC to expeditiously develop benchmarks to assure the
reasonableness of these contracts without unfairly "second guessing" these
decisions in later years.
This process should be in place early in 2001 to provide adequate
opportunity for contracts to be negotiated and in place before Summer 2001.
Coupled with the forward contracting issue is the question of the obligation
of utilities to buy and sell all of their electricity through the California
Power Exchange (PX). This issue requires careful consideration since these
transactions through the PX are currently subject to full disclosure, and
safeguards are in place to assure delivery. These protections for consumers
and business must not be lost.
Among the suggestions that have been made to ensure that utilities have a
cost-effective portfolio of energy is the proposal that utilities retain
their existing generation, as was recommended in the CPUC's environmental
impact report regarding PG&E's hydroelectric facilities. There is growing
consensus around this matter.
I would hope that the paramount objective in this series of regulatory
decisions will be the protection of the interests of consumers.
Invigorating the Demand Side
Conservation and efficiency are the cornerstones of California,s energy
future.
Under my Executive Order, the State of California has achieved more than 180
MW of load reduction earlier this year during Stage 2 alerts, and is moving
quickly to add another 250 MW of demand reduction for summer 2001. The
federal government is following suit for federal facilities. The state and
federal governments should set an example for similar voluntary load
reduction initiatives in the private sector.
I was pleased to work with the California Grocers Association this summer to
develop a voluntary 10 percent demand reduction program during peak hours
for more than 2,000 groceries statewide. This program must be duplicated in
other areas where feasible and the business community in California has
pledged to work cooperatively toward that end.
I am calling on the CPUC to expedite its investigation of the state,s demand
reduction programs for commercial and industrial users, including the
interruptible programs. Those that are successful should be expanded. Those
that require change should be modified. And new opportunities should be
developed to reduce and shift loads during peak hours and short supply.
These programs must be in place no later than March 2001, to provide
adequate opportunity for private sector planning and participation.
I am also calling on the CPUC and CEC to coordinate efforts to demonstrate
and implement programs which provide real-time price signals and
energy-reduction systems to sophisticated commercial electricity users, and
to recommend a process for voluntary participation by consumers and small
businesses.
In September, I signed historic urgency legislation that provides $50
million for demand reduction programs that can be implemented by Summer
2001. I also signed legislation that provides approximately $500 million
annually for the next 10 years for energy efficiency, research and
development and renewable resource support. The CPUC and CEC are
aggressively pursuing innovative demand reduction programs using these
funds.
Institutional Reform
As I testified at the FERC hearing on November 14, I agree that the
stakeholder boards of the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) and
California Power Exchange present inherent conflicts of interest for their
members and must be replaced. The composition of these boards is specified
by state law, both as to size and as to qualifications for directors.
I will propose legislation to replace the stakeholder boards with
independent boards that are accountable for their actions, and that will
consider both the need to assure reliability and the most economic method to
do so.
I intend to move quickly on this aspect of the problem. Your concurrence in
this effort is extremely important. It will little serve the consumers,
utilities, merchant generators or other parties to become embroiled in
litigation over exactly what powers Congress conferred on the FERC in 1935,
or what traditional state powers, if any, Congress meant to circumscribe or
override.
Recognizing that there may be a need for more extensive reconstitution of
these entities, as some have suggested, I do not intend to let the status
quo continue while those debates are carried on. California will alter the
composition and membership of the boards so that the entities are in
position to contribute to achieving the paramount objectives of both state
and federal law -- protection of the consumers' interests.
In 1996 Governor Pete Wilson and his CPUC reposed a great deal of trust in
the FERC in moving California,s electricity system into an unbundled,
federalized mode. Now is the time for you to justify that trust. I want to
cooperate with you in transitioning to a market-based approach to provide
this essential service. However, first and foremost, I want you to do your
job and to let me do mine. Together we can protect the electricity consumers
of California and work to restore their confidence.
Sincerely,
GRAY DAVIS

Karen Edson
kedson@ns.net
916/552-7070

Karen Edson
kedson@ns.net
916/552-7070


Continental

"Hallmark, Diem" <Diem.Hallmark@Williams.com> on 11/13/2000 04:54:03 PM
To: "'Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com'" <Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

Just to make sure... it's with Continental, right?

See you soon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com [mailto:Andrew.H.Lewis@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 4:33 PM
To: diem.hallmark@williams.com
Subject:

DM,

My itinerary is as follows:

Friday, November 17

Departure:  Houston (IAH) 2:26 PM

Arrival: Tulsa 3:50 PM

Continental Flight 1667

Monday, November 20

Departure: Tulsa 8:39 AM

Arrival: Houston (IAH) 10:10 AM (not that you care)

If you need to reach me after I land, my cell phone number is 713-306-0760.

Looking forward to seeing you guys,

Andy


Hey, guys:  I'm negotiating a rush ISDA for ECTRIC under the law of England
and Wales.  I believe that Michael drafted originally.

(1)  submission to English courts and waiver of all objections

(2)  setoff  for all events (excluding affiliates) except for Tax Event or
Tax Event Upon Merger

Are the foregoing acceptable for ECTRIC?

Your immediate response is appreciated as Michael Moulton wants to book deal
Tuesday,  Nov. 7.

Thanks.  Sara


---------------------- Forwarded by Allison Navin/Corp/Enron on 07/07/2000
04:05 PM ---------------------------

"Andrea Spring" <aae@dellnet.com> on 07/05/2000 11:56:30 AM
To: "'Allison Navin \(E-mail\)'" <Allison_Navin@enron.com>, "'Anthony Foti
\(E-mail\)'" <AFOTI@AKINGUMP.COM>, "Art Brownell \(E-mail\)"
<AWBrownell@aol.com>, "'Bill Paxon \(E-mail\)'" <bpaxon@akingump.com>,
"'Cynthia Sandherr \(E-mail\)'" <Cynthia_Sandherr@enron.com>, "David N.
Friedman \(E-mail\)" <david_friedman@afandpa.org>, "Donn Salvosa \(E-mail\)"
<DSalvosa@epsa.org>, "'Gay H. Friedmann \(E-mail\)'" <gfriedmann@ingaa.org>,
"'Gene Peters \(E-mail\)'" <gpeters@epsa.org>, "'Henry Hubbard \(E-mail\)'"
<hubbardh@fleishman.com>, "'Jamie Tucker \(E-mail\)'" <jtucker@akingump.com>,
"'Jane Turner \(E-mail\)'" <jane_turner@afandpa.org>, "Jim McIntire
\(E-mail\)" <jim_mcintire@americanchemistry.com>, "Jim McVaney \(E-mail\)"
<Jim_McVaney@americanchemistry.com>, "'John Runyan \(E-mail\)'"
<john.runyan@ipaper.com>, "'John Sparkman \(E-mail\)'" <jssparkman@papl.com>,
"John Stinson \(E-mail\)" <jmstinson@worldnet.att.net>, "'Karen Penafiel
\(E-mail\)'" <kpenafie@boma.org>, "'Katie Strong \(E-mail\)'"
<kstrong@AKINGUMP.COM>, "Kim Brooks \(E-mail\)" <kbrooks@nam.org>, "'Kim
Martin \(E-mail\)'" <martinki@fleishman.com>, "'Marc Yacker \(E-mail\)'"
<myacker@elcon.org>, "'Mark L. Kemmer \(E-mail\)'" <mark.l.kemmer@gm.com>,
"Mark Seetin \(E-mail\)" <nymex2@unidial.com>, "'Mark Whitenton \(E-mail\)'"
<mwhitenton@nam.org>, "Nina Plaushin \(E-mail\)" <nplaushin@ppl.com>,
"Paulette Pidcock \(E-mail\)" <paulette.pidcock@pge-corp.com>, "'Steve Kline
\(E-mail\)'" <steven.kline@pge-corp.com>
cc:

Subject: language Bliley sent to Commerce members

Here's the full bill that Bliley sent out to committee members on Friday.
It's basically HR2944 with Bliley's latest transmission language substituted
in.

_______________________________
Andrea Spring
Executive Director
Americans for Affordable Electricity
1101 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20004
phone: 202-347-6371
fax: 202-393-4637
e-mail: aspring.aae@dellnet.com

 - 010_.PDF
 - fullsec1.wpd


The purpose of this note is to update you on travel related to the recruiting efforts of the Program.
 Over the weekend, President Bush asked all Americans to resume their activities, but to do so with the heightened awareness that the country is now at war with terrorists and with any country that supports their activities.  Enron's current position is that employees should avoid all non-essential business travel.  With these things in mind, and for the safety of our employees, I very strongly encourage you to consider alternatives to business travel for recruiting activities.
 Earlier this year, we made the decision to emphasize real-time and direct recruiting methods, which by their design require less time and presence on campus.  I would now ask that each executive lead and recruiter carefully review their campus schedule / strategy and consider modifications.  Technology has given us the opportunity to use tools like video conferencing, telephone interviews, email, and CD based resume books.  The focusing benefits of these tools can significantly decrease the number of people required for on-campus presentations and interviews, and in some cases may even eliminate the need for these activities.  In addition to the primary concern of safety, a major disruption to the travel grid like that which occurred last week could strand critical Enron business personnel in relatively remote locations.
 Later this week we will make a decision regarding participation in the National Black MBA Conference in Orlando, Florida.
 If you have any questions, please contact me at extension 36671.
 Best regards,
Billy Lemmons


Mark Palmer
	11/01/2000 03:42 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Message Points

I think we should shy away from the 300 MW message.  It's getting in the way
of the positive message, and the math turns out to be a bit "Goreish."
(read: fuzzy)  I found myself wandering down all sorts of blind alleys in my
spin to Dow Jones.  I say we generalize it more.  Something to the effect of
"The price caps send the wrong message to the marketplace.  Whether it's gas
lines in the seventies or bread lines in the old Soviet Union, price caps and
market intervention cause problems."

Mark


Are you ok with this (they would not be listing, as agent for 3 listed
utilities)?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 09:54 AM -----

	Sharen Cason
	04/24/2001 09:34 AM

		 To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L
Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom
Moran/Enron@EnronXGate, Stephanie Sever/Enron@EnronXGate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Alliant Energy Corporate Services

I have checked with Kim Theriot and if no one has any objections, we would
like to be consistent with the way we have handled agency situations
previously.  Set the name  up in Global as Alliant Energy Corporate Services,
Inc. , as authorized agent .  I will make a counterparty specific template
that includes the rest of the legal name of the counterparty.  We have sent
this format to other agency entities and it was accepted.

Please let me know when this has been done.  We will have to move records in
the Enpower system because a new record was set up.

Thanks!


Kevin

Has Dave called you on this or do I need to do something.


After close of business on February 8th and through December 31, 2002, UBS is required to provide certain 'Transition Services'  as described in Article XI, section 11.3 of the comprehensive Licensing Agreement between Enron Corp and UBS AG.   Enron will provide a written task list of  certain services to be performed by UBSW Energy employees.  UBS shall provide the information technology management services, financial advisory services and any other services mutually agreed to, with respect to trading and risk management for the existing Enron trading book.  In order to ensure we are meeting these requirements, we will be asking Enron to funnel all requests through Eddy Daniels.   Eddy Daniels will be responsible for allocating resources for each request in consultation with the Department Heads.

Effective immediately, all employees already contacted by the Estate are required to keep a time sheet of hours spent on services performed on behalf of Enron.   The following information is required on the attached time sheet template:

Employee Name
Pay Period (Month)
Description of specific work activity performed by employee
Time spent on project/service in 1/4 hour increments
Out of pocket expenses incurred each day

The time sheets will be used for purposes of billing Enron back for services rendered per section 11.5 of the agreement.   The following procedures are required for us to complete the billing and for purposes of maintaining the appropriate records needed for auditing purposes:

Submit completed time sheet to Anne Eastwood (ECS 05195)
Attach original receipts to time sheet for expenses greater than $25.

The time sheets should be completed and turned in the next business day after each pay period. If you have any questions, please contact Hope Vargas at ext. 35280 or Eddy at ext. 31440.

Thanks,

Louise


Start Date: 2/2/02; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020201.txt


This request has been pending your approval for  2 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000076510&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000076510
Request Create Date : 11/19/01 8:31:34 AM
Requested For       : tanya.smith@enron.com
Resource Name       : Sitara Houston Production Central Edit Logistics
Resource Type       : Applications


oh.  i can't keep up with you!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:34 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

killing me, it was a joke

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:29 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

WHAT??????????

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

please do, it will save sarah the trouble of hiring someone

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you always confuse me with everything.  i think that you do that on purpose.  i'm going to kill you!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

your getting confused again

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i hate you!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

anytime

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

well thanks for your help charlie brown

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:24 AM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

nope and nope

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

did you go work out this morning?

do you know an orthodontist in houston?


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/20/99 08:44
AM ---------------------------

Scott Donaldson@EES
12/17/99 09:36 AM
To: Alicia Goodrow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
michael.k.patrick@us.arthurandersen.com, Wade Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Joel Ephross/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Project Blackbird Draft Docs

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES on 12/17/99 09:30
AM ---------------------------

"MURIEL McFARLING" <MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com> on 12/16/99 08:19:16 PM

To:	Arafte@bracepatt.com, mmoreland@bracepatt.com, sgussett@bracepatt.com,
ttomlinson@bracepatt.com, Deborah Culver/HOU/EES@EES, Jimmie
Williams/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Callan/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES@EES,
mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com, eawilburn@prickett.com, Kenton@rlf.com,
jephross@velaw.com
cc:	"DAVID BARBOUR" <BARBD@andrews-kurth.com>, "DALLAS GUEST ACCOUNT #2"
<DGUEST2@andrews-kurth.com>, "DEBORAH LOWE" <LOWED@andrews-kurth.com>,
"MURIEL McFARLING" <MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject:	Project Blackbird

Attached, in Microsoft Word format, are initial drafts of each of the
following documents:

LLC Agreement - Blackbird 1 (221575_2)
LLC Agreement - Blackbird 2 (221576_2)
Trust Agreement - Blackbird 1 Interst Owner Trust (221577_2)
Facility Agreement (221578_2)
Schedule to ISDA Master Agreement (221579_2)
Sale and Auction Agreement (221582_2)
Total Return Swap Confirmation (221685_2)

 - 221685_2.doc
 - 221576_2.doc
 - 221577_2.doc
 - 221578_2.doc
 - 221579_2.doc
 - 221582_2.doc
 - 221575_2.doc


great man...we just lifted a new pad too this past weekend...Bunker Hill
area...sweet

fletch


fyi.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Carter, Tamara
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:48 AM
To: Garcia, Clarissa; Lamadrid, Victor; Kelly, Katherine L.; Franklin, Cynthia
Subject: VERMILLION 200 Tennessee

FYI
The Vermillion 200 & 203 outages have been pushed back to Wednesday May 23rd
thru Sunday May 27th.
These are the dates as of now.  I will let you know if there are any changes.
Thanks!
Tamie


Start Date: 5/1/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001050108.txt is empty.
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001050108.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 5/1/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_PV
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000
09:10 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Airam Arteaga                           08/04/2000 09:10 AM

To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vector Pipeline write-up by D. Baughman.


I will be out of the office (on vacation) the week of the 25th.  Jennifer
Denny will be my primary backup x35824.

Sheri

ps - if Sally wants to include the EnronOnline management report in her memo,
we will be producing the weekly executive report for the week of December
18th on Wednesday the 27th, and on January 2nd for the week of the 25th.


Dale McMaster called this afternoon to advise that the Power Pool Council
agreed to delay any decision on the recently proposed rule changes (importers
excluded from setting pool price and dispatch risk) for a period of two
weeks.  During this two week period Dale has been asked to obtain stakeholder
input into ways to address concerns about whether the spot price in the
Alberta Power Pool is a product of interaction among competitiors in a
efficient market.

In our discussions with the Power Pool and ADRD today and yesterday Enron
expressed its willingness to work with the Power Pool to provide feedback on
suggested rule changes but has also made it clear that we do not agree with
the premise that there is a "problem" that requires "emergency" amendments to
the Pool rules.  Our position has been that Alberta is short supply, and
significant changes to the rules and/or market design will only discourage
new generation development.

Dale McMaster had just left the Power Pool Council meeting when he called and
had not yet put much thought into how to define the issue he has to address
and what the process will be.   We discussed the process and it appears he
will likely receive comments from stakeholders at large and also assemble a
small committee of 4-5 stakeholders (which would include Enron) to work with
the Power Pool to consider possible changes to the Pool rules.  Dale said he
would try to pull together a "terms of reference" document that would define
the mandate of the small committee by tomorrow.

After my call with Dale McMaster, Peter Keohane and I spoke to Aleck Trawick
and we have asked Blakes to assist us in three areas:

1) Once the terms of reference of this small committee are released (and
assuming Enron is asked to participate on the committee) Blakes will assist
us with preparing a letter that states that Enron's participation does not
represent acknowledgement or agreement that the Power Pool Rules must be
amended to address the concerns of some stakeholders about real time pricing
in Alberta and that Enron's participation on the committee is on a without
prejudice basis;

2) Enron needs to obtain the final memo from Frontier Economics in which
Frontier provides its opinion on how the proposed rule changes: i) would
introduce price discrimination into the Alberta electricity market, ii) would
be contrary to the development of an efficient, fair and openly competitive
market for electricity, iii) would compromise the independence of the Power
Pool, and iv) would have the expected effect of artificially depressing the
real time price of electricity in Alberta.  Once Blakes receives a copy of
the Frontier Economics memo, they will prepare a memo for Enron advising: i)
whether the two week process of consultation by the Power Pool is in
accordance with the standards required of the PPC as an administrative
tribunal operating in Alberta; and ii) whether such rule changes offend the
provisions of the EUA;

3) Blakes will advise Enron of the possible avenues of recourse (i.e. appeal
to the AEUB, and/or legal action in the Court of Queen's Bench) in the event
the proposed rule changes (or similar changes) are approved by the PPC at the
end of this two week period.   GPC and Eric Thode will also be consulted on
this issue and obviously input from all those within Enron working on this
project will be sought prior to any decision being made to pursue any
possible legal remedies.

Please advise if you have any comments.

Regards,

Rob


How are we handling these now?  Last time I talked to Jeff, we weren't going
to lift the restrictions until next week (assuming we do lift the
restrictions).  Any word?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/31/2000
02:26 PM ---------------------------

Scott Gilchrist@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/31/2000 10:45 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Cindy Olson, Rebecca McDonald

Subject: Stella Chan /Project Summer transfers

Steve/ Cindy

Just want to state a case for this move, (before everyone starts up on the
movement moratorium issues surronding the " EI" companies -which I understand
is still in place).

Stella Chan (Director level) is one of 6 expats Apachi have seconded into our
SK Enron JV in Korea. Because they all mobilized at the same time, Darrell
Kinder and I put in place a rotation plan whereby some would leave early,
some extend (so we didnt have everyone leaving the JV at the same time). Its
worked well to date, and we've mamanged to keep the Partners happy with the
moves/replacements.

Bottom line with respect to the Project Summer moratorium (in my view) is
that because Stella will be replaced she is no longer part of the
'intellectual capital' the buyer (or any future buyer) is seeking to retain,
and so the move should go ahead.

Hope you concur.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/31/2000 10:34 AM ---------------------------

	Enron International

	From:  Anthony Dorazio                           08/30/2000 09:21 AM

To: Darrell W Kinder/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Scott Gilchrist/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Chan

Darrell,

Stella Chan's contract will conclude March 1 2001. She had shown some desire
to repatriate early and under the repatriation agreement I allowed her to
start her search (six months prior). Stella's search was very quick and she
has landed a job with the Corporate Public Affairs group under Harry
Kingerski, who works for Rick Shapiro, who works for Steve Kean. She has set
a preliminary job switch for October 16, 2000.

This does not cause me too much concern, for as you are aware Waymon Votaw
who works in the Southern Cone group under John Guidry has shown a desire to
be Stella's replacement. The timing of this could work out real well. Please
pass this to the powers to be for approval so I may move forward with the
next step with both individuals.

Thanks

Tony


I love free stuff, even agreements.

Any calls from 33?

Kay

From: Heather Kroll/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/11/2001 10:39 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: AIG Asset Management Agreement/Brokerage Agreement

Reagan thought you may like to see the Bracewell draft of an Asset Management
Agreement for AIG.

Read it, file it, or throw it away.  Completely your call.

Heather
 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Jay Sonnenberg" <jsonnenberg@bracepatt.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jay+20Sonnenberg+22+20+3Cjsonnenberg+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3
E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:57 PM
To: Kroll, Heather; Pagan, Ozzie; steve.van.hooser@enron.com
Cc: Aaron Roffwarg; W. Cleland Dade; Clark Thompson; Scott Miller
Subject: AIG Asset Management Agreement/Brokerage Agreement

Attached please find the initial drafts of the proposed Asset Management
Agreement and Brokerage Agreement for your review.  We'll be prepared to turn
around these documents to AIG tomorrow.

Jay

Jay Sonnenberg
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
711 Louisiana St., Suite 2900
Houston, TX  77002-2781
(713) 221-1417 (Ph)
(713) 221-2158 (Fax)

 - #1142119 v3 - ASSET MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT.doc
 - #1276593 v2 - BROKERAGE AGREEMENT.doc


Ken,  Attached is the Northwest Pipeline FA with my comments incorporated. I
have attached both a clean and a redlined version.  Please note that I added
a cap to the total facilities costs.  This is a recommendation.  To the
extent we have no cap however,  Crescendo is at risk for all costs they
incur.  Cost overruns could be significant.  Please review and let me know if
you have any questions.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 03/31/2000
12:07 PM ---------------------------

Xi Xi
03/29/2000 08:00 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Donald Lassere/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: WTO Impact on the Privatization & Liberalization of the Global
telecommunication markets

Rick,

Here are some articles which examine the ineffectiveness of WTO agreement
(1997) on the opening up of the telecommunication markets around the world.
One of the major forthcoming issues is Japan's risk of tbeing aken to the WTO
over its high access costs in the Japanese domestic market.
Both the US and EU have been urging the Japanese to bring down the cost or
face the consequences.  We are still waiting to see what will happen in
Brussels? Whether the WTO have enough power to enforce its regulations would
be a major factor in determining the its prowess in the future.

best regards,
xi xi


FYI. Thanks. Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:17 PM
To: Blair, Lynn
Subject: Re: PAA - Ava Garcia

Yes we need to get it in asap
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


As mentioned in our recent group meeting, here are the documents put together
by Pat Boylston at Stoel Rives. (they are also located in my directory under
Municipality Info):

Here is a short questionnaire that I send to California Cities to begin the
initial due diligence process:

Shari


Mark Walker,

I have not heard anything from Germany.  Please respond to Ilan with the
update.  Also, please be sure to include the definitions including the paper
you wrote which identifies the contractual availability definitions.

Thanks,
Hollis
---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 04/15/2002
04:34 PM ---------------------------
From: Ilan Caplan on 04/15/2002 02:38 PM
To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: 1.5 Fleet Availability

Gentlemen -

Good afternoon.  I hope this email finds you well.  Just wanted to see where
we stood with following information:

1) Data from Germany
2) the contractual availability (soft-copy)
3) the machine availability (soft-copy)
4) the new availability number (2002) with the new definition of contractual
availability

Thanks,
Ilan

---------------------- Forwarded by Ilan Caplan/EWC/Enron on 04/15/2002 02:42
PM ---------------------------

Hollis Kimbrough
04/12/2002 11:49 AM
To: Ilan Caplan/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Fisher/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mark V Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Nueman/EWC/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: 1.5 Fleet Availability

Ilan,

Mark Walker will send a request to Germany for their availability data.  Mark
will also provide the definitions of Machine availability.  The contractual
availability is what was included in the memo I handed you when you were in
my office on Wednesday.  If you need an electronic copy of that  document
Mark can send it to you.

With respect to making us responsible (as the coordinator) for obtaining the
Germany availability data:  We have no leverage over our European
counterparts and cannot compel them to provide this data on a 1 day notice.
I want to avoid setting expectations that are clearly beyond our control.  We
will, however, give it a shot.

I did notice the European data stops in Sep 01 so we need 6 months to fill in
all the gaps.  Has Becky been unable to obtain any more recent data or is
this the most current info you have?

Thanks,
Hollis


This is a copy of your message sent to divasparkles@talkmatch.com -->

Hello,

I saw your profile and picture on the web site.  I sent you my profile to see if there is any interest.  Take a look and see if there is, I'd sure like to hear from you!

Paul

Click the following link to view the sender's profile:
http://www.match.com/doubleblind/showprofile.asp?UserID=484948454C4B4E&trackingid=65685

The following is my profile text:

Hello, I'm a down to earth person that likes to laugh and have a good time. I work in downtown Denver as a commodities trader for a large energy trading house. I do enjoy my career but understand life needs to be kept in prospective and be balanced. I enjoy activities over sitting and watching, but I have been known to sit in front of the TV and watch football or college basketball all day. I'm looking for someone who enjoys life and doesn't take themselves too seriously.

*********************************************************

ADDITIONAL TIPS from Match.com:

Our anonymous re-mailer will strip away your real email address, so
that it will NOT appear in the 'From:' line.

You may also contact this person from their Match.com profile by
clicking 'Contact this person' and composing your message directly from the
site.

However:

* Check to ensure that your email address is not in the BODY of your
message as we are unable to remove these.

* Check to ensure that you REMOVE ANY AUTOMATIC SIGNATURE at the end of

your email. And note that you cannot use 'Cc:' or 'Bcc:' if you want
your email to remain anonymous.

Match.com does not monitor private email between members, nor are we
liable for the content of these messages. All members are bound by our
Match.com Service Agreement.


Yes please.  Jeff, I really appreciate it.
tom


fyi.  this is fine with me--pls remind me.  df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 06/23/2000
02:09 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Corp Accounts Payable Department                           06/22/2000
06:54 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:

Subject: Reimbursement of Individually Billed Items

The use of cell phones and pagers has increased dramatically in the past few
years.  As a result the Accounts Payable department has seen a rapid increase
in the number of invoices and vendors.  With the higher volume, we have
reviewed our processes in order to continue our rapid payment cycle.

Although we encourage vendors to address their invoices to individual
employees, they often mail invoices directly to Accounts Payable.  At times
they fail to list the individual who uses the pager or cell phone.  In these
cases we return the invoice to the vendor.  If the employee is designated, we
try to track him/her down and forward the invoice.  The high level of
employee movement among jobs and locations at Enron has made this
increasingly challenging.  Either way, we end up doing something less
productive than paying invoices.

To maintain satisfactory response to our vendors and to reduce time necessary
for research, we request that employees who have pagers, cell phones, and
other individually billed items such as licenses, subscriptions, etc., pay
for them by personal check or charge card (if applicable*payment instructions
are usually indicated on the invoice) and request reimbursement through
employee expense reports.

By submitting these charges on your expense report, you can help us reduce
the amount of time spent researching and forwarding invoices, the number of
checks generated by Treasury, the number of vendors in our database, and the
turnaround time for payment of invoices.


can we move this to the 32 floor of the enron building ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	monica.l.brown@accenture.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-monica+2El+2Ebrown+40accenture+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:41 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Cc:	sheri.a.righi@accenture.com; mery.l.brown@accenture.com
Subject:	Confirmation: Risk Management Simulation Meeting 9/27/01

Hi Dutch,

This message is to confirm our meeting with you on Thursday, Sept. 27th
from 2:00-4:00pm in Conference Room 14C2 3AC.

If you should have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me
at 713-345-6687.

Thanks,
Monica L. Brown
Accenture
PDP Experienced Analyst
Houston - 2929 Allen Parkway
Direct Dial: +1 713 837 1749
VPN & Octel: 83 / 71749
Fax: +1 713 257 7211
email: monica.l.brown@accenture.com

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.


Saddle Up for NESA / HEA's 24th Annual Meeting
"Deep in the Heart of Texas"

September 9 - 11, 2001
Hyatt Regency Hill Country Resort
San Antonio, Texas

The Annual Meeting Planning Committee has put together an outstanding
program for your review.  It is attached below in an Adobe Acrobat PDF file
- if you have problems with the attachment please call NESA / HEA
Headquarters at (713) 856-6525 and we'll mail or fax a copy out immediately.

General Session topics include:

*	Will Tomorrow's Restructured Electric Infrastructure Support
Tomorrow's Economy?
*	Power Deregulation Panel: Developer/IPP, Utility/Transmission, Power
Marketer, Government, Retail
*	Power Demand
*	The State of the Energy Industry
*	New Political Administration - Impact on Energy Policy and
Environment

Networking Opportunities:

*	Opening Reception - Sunday, September 9
*	Golf Tournament & Tours of Area Attractions - Monday, September 10

The Hyatt Regency Hill Country Resort has a limited block of rooms available
for NESA / HEA Members and Guests - be sure to check page 6 for lodging
information and make your reservation as soon as possible.

We hope that you take this opportunity to meet with your colleagues and
customers in this relaxing yet professional environment to exchange ideas on
matters of importance covering a broad spectrum of subjects.  The Annual
Meeting agenda includes timely issues presented by knowledgeable industry
leaders who will discuss formidable and thought provoking issues affecting
the energy industry today.

Please take a moment to review the attached brochure.  NESA / HEA encourages
and appreciates you taking the time to PASS THE BROCHURE ON to industry
personnel who would benefit from participating at this conference.

NESA / HEA's 24th Annual Meeting
Educating the Energy Professional

To UNSUBSCRIBE from the NESA / HEA Member Email Blast list please respond to
this email with the word UNSUBSCRIBE typed into the subject field.  This
will preclude you from receiving any email blasts in the future, but hard
copies of the material will be sent to your attention.

 <<512_NESA 2001annlMtgJAM.pdf>>

 - 512_NESA 2001annlMtgJAM.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001
03:10 PM ---------------------------

Zimin Lu
05/02/2001 01:41 PM
To: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Re: Asian Option for Pavel

Our convention is whoever finalizes the model should write the
documentation.  It does not make sense
to write one when changes are anticipated.  You have been working on this
almost a year, it never
strikes you that we need a documentation ?

I created Exotica.xll, does that also give you an excuse not working on
Exotica documentation ?

Zimin

Paulo Issler
05/02/2001 11:52 AM
To: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tai Woo/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Pavel Zadorozhny/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Re: Asian Option for Pavel

I am surprised that we do not have the documentation ready.
I can make that for you. It is not there because you did not put that
together by the time it was created and all the changes I have made did not
required changes on the functionality.
Paulo Issler

Zimin Lu
05/02/2001 11:29 AM
To: Tai Woo/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pavel Zadorozhny/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Re: Asian Option for Pavel

Tai Woo,

Here are the c-codes for the CrudeAPO.  'Sig' is the spot
volatility meaning the price volatility within the delivery period.
You should consult  with Pavel for the definition of this "extra"
parameters.   We
would like to see the Position Monitor once you get it running.
We might have some additional suggestions.

Paulo,

Why don't we have a documentation on CrudeAPO you worked on ?
I can not find it in Exotica help file.   Please supply that to Tai, thanks.

--------------------------------------

From: Tai Woo/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 09:55 AM
To: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kara Maloney/ENRON@enronXgate, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Asian Option for Pavel

This morning, Zimin told me that Pavel is using a special model in evaluating
his Asian option portfolio.
He asked me to talk to you in order to access to the code so that I can see
the difference made to the model.

As I cannot find the doc. describing this model, please tell me what that new
input parameter 'Sig' is.

Thanks,


Russell:
Just fyi, they're willing to take us for 20 years.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001 08:17 AM ---------------------------
From:	Eric Bass/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/10/2001 07:42 AM
To:	John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	FW: details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship	 Channel Inside FERC

John,
Attached are the volumes associated with the 20 yr Soc Gen deal we talked about.  I have yet to hear from credit.  I will let you know the status as it becomes available.

Eric

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Alexander.WERNER@us.socgen.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Alexander+2EWERNER+40us+2Esocgen+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 10, 2001 7:34 AM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	details for long term flat price swap on Nat Gas Houston Ship	 Channel Inside FERC

Hi Eric,

Please find below the detailed terms of a possible deal that we have been
talking about during our phone conversation this morning.

Nature of deal : If the transaction takes place, Societe Generale would sell a
financial fixed price swap (flat price, not basis differential) to Enron. The
monthly settlement would be financial. There would not be any  exchange of
physical product.

Period of the deal : June 1st, 2001 to January 31st, 2021.

Used Reference :  Natural Gas-Houston Ship Channel Index Inside FERC , monthly
settlement.

Volumes of the financial swap transaction : Please find below the volumes given
month by month in MMBTU.

(See attached file: volumes-10-5-01-for-Enron.xls)

Since there is a tiny chance that the deal trades today, could you please check
if you have credit with SG for this period.
If not, could you find out how much time it approximately takes to get the
credit.
In terms of credit, SG is good with Enron for this period.

Thank you,

Alexander Werner

 **************************************************************************
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely
for the addressee(s).  It shall not be construed as a recommendation to
buy or sell any security.  Any unauthorized access, use, reproduction,
disclosure or dissemination is prohibited.

Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
shall assume any legal liability or responsibility for any incorrect,
misleading or altered information contained herein.
 **************************************************************************

**************************************************************************
The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely
for the addressee(s).  It shall not be construed as a recommendation to
buy or sell any security.  Any unauthorized access, use, reproduction,
disclosure or dissemination is prohibited.
Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
shall assume any legal liability or responsibility for any incorrect,
misleading or altered information contained herein.
**************************************************************************

 - volumes-10-5-01-for-Enron.xls


Attached is the Contracts/PLE team on-call schedule for the first half of 2002.
Please note the following procedural changes for the Contracts/PLE on call person...

The on call person will be the primary contact for questions for all three pipes, both contract and capacity release.

The team member on call for the upcoming weekend will also be the person on call during the week.
	 (The on-call period starts Monday morning and continues until the next Monday morning.)

The on-call person will be in the office until 5pm (5:30pm during bid week which is the last week of the month).

If you have any questions or suggestions for improving the process, feel free to call.

Dennis P. Lee
ETS
Gas Logistics
(713) 853-1715
dennis.lee@enron.com


> -----Original Message-----
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Subject: FW: Similarities
>
>  <<40Plus.jpg>>

 - 40Plus.jpg


Thanks for reserving tickets to the October 17 Presidential speech at
the Sacramento Memorial Auditorium.  We are now in possession of the
tickets and must ask you to pick them up as soon as possible, either
Monday or Tuesday at our offices, 980 Ninth Street, Suite 2200 from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.

In the event you wish to have the tickets delivered to you overnight by
Federal Express or other major carrier, please call Geri Royer and give
her an account number to which they may be charged, no later than 3 p.m.
Monday, for delivery Tuesday.

As a last resort, we have reserved a room at the Sacramento Convention
Center for October 17, 2001 where the last remaining unclaimed tickets
will be held from 7:30 a.m. until 9 a.m., however it is recommended that
you claim your tickets as quickly as possible to ensure your seating.

We are also attaching a sheet of instructions, which you should read
carefully and retain for the day of the event.  Also there is a map of
downtown Sacramento with parking garages marked, if you should need it.

Thanks for your interest and we look forward to seeing you all at this
historic event.

EVENT INSTRUCTIONS

AUDITORIUM DOORS OPEN AT 10:00 A.M., CLOSE AT 11:00 A.M. WITH EVERYONE
SEATED. NO EXCEPTIONS WILL BE MADE. GIVE YOURSELF PLENTY OF TIME, AS
SECURITY WILL BE VERY TIGHT.

YOU MUST HAVE A TICKET TO OBTAIN ENTRY TO THE AUDITORIUM. THERE WILL BE
NO TICKET WILL-CALL AT THE EVENT.

PARKING WILL BE SCARCE. PLAN ON PARKING OUTSIDE A FOUR-BLOCK BOUNDARY
AROUND THE AUDITORIUM, AS IT IS LIKELY THAT THIS AREA WILL BE CLOSED TO
VEHICULAR TRAFFIC.

A MAP OF SURROUNDING PARKING LOTS IS ATTACHED. WE SUGGEST PUBLIC
TRANSPORTATION FOR THOSE ARRIVING FROM LOCAL AIRPORTS.

PLEASE DO NOT BRING PURSES, BRIEF CASES, BAGS OR OTHER BELONGINGS THAT
MUST BE SEARCHED. IT WILL DRAMATICALLY SLOW THE PROCESS OF GAINING ENTRY
TO THE AUDITORIUM. METAL DETECTORS WILL BE IN USE. WE DO RECOMMEND
PICTURE IDENTIFICATION BE CARRIED ON YOUR PERSON, HOWEVER.

PLEASE REMEMBER TO TURN YOUR CELL PHONES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
OFF (OR REFRAIN FROM BRINGING THEM).

SEATING IS ON FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS. PLEASE FOLLOW THE ON-SITE
DIRECTIONS OF THE USHERS ONCE INSIDE THE AUDITORIUM.

CAMERAS ARE ALLOWED, HOWEVER WE SUGGEST REMOVING THE FILM, AS CAMERAS
MAY BE OPENED FOR INSPECTION.

NO SIGNS, FLAGS OR OTHER MESSAGE-TYPE ITEMS WILL BE ALLOWED IN THE
AUDITORIUM.

BUSINESS ATTIRE OR BUSINESS CASUAL IS APPROPRIATE.

If you should have any questions, please contact Geri Royer immediately.


Yes, Please forward me the login and password again.  I would like to be
included in Enron's corporate wide license.

Thanks,
Mike Grigsby


What are we doing to cover scheduling over the holiday weekend?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sarnowski, Julie
Sent:	Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:17 PM
To:	O'Neil, Murray P.; Sheppard, Kathryn; Gang, Lisa; Cavanaugh, Darren
Subject:	I will be out of the office July 3rd

Happy 4th!

-Julie


Paul,

Attached is the Reserve Report form 9/00 with a qualifier of rr900, a letter
explaning why production has dropped, a spreadsheet with updated production
vs. line pressures and a net back calculation sheet (utilized for wellhead
pricing) . As soon as I get the updated LOE's, I will send them to you.

Jim

Gerald, please see the pressure letter and graph.  For your information.

 - SA VPP GAS.exe
 - San Arroyo Pressure Letter.doc
 - Sa Production  Line Pressure  Graphs.xls
 - Netback calculation - Crescndo.xls


INVITATION

Chairperson:	Tom Wilbeck

Invitees:
	D Todd Hall
	Sanjeev Khanna
	Chris Gaskill
	Larry May
	Keith Holst
	Elsa Piekielniak
	Jennifer Fraser
	Mickey O'Callaghan
	Craig H Sutter
	Rhenn Cherry
	Jim Brown
	Lloyd Will
	Susan Harrison
	Savita Puthigai
	Joe Wong

Date:		5/18/2001
Time:		12:00 PM - 1:30 PM (Central Standard Time)
Room:		EB 49 C3@ENRON

Description:
	Leadership Focus Group in Room EB 49 C3

Detailed Description:

When: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:00 PM-1:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB 49 C3

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Hello Directors, Sr Directors, and Vice Presidents,

Because of your excellent Leadership skills, you've been selected by your HR and training community to share your insight in a focus group discussion on Friday, May 18th from 12:00 'til 1:30 in EB 49C3.

We have a customized Managers level leadership class coming in June and your input on Friday will help shape this offering to provide the most benefit to it's attendees.

The focus group will be facilitated by Enron's partner in this leadership venture, PDI, Personnel Decisions International.

Your input is greatly appreciated and needed.  Please reply to this invitation and let me know if you will attend.

Should  you have any questions or concerns, please contact Tom Wilbeck with the EWS training group @ 5-7536.

Thank you for your support in this venture.


DeAnn Spangler
13227Ambaum BlvdSW
Burien, WA 98146
dee007ram62@msn.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

DeAnn Spangler


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	kdavis@manfinancial.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	jarnold@enron.com
Cc:	Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject:	Positions

Dear John

In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you yesterday, I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it includes no
options at all.

short 1660 May 2002 futures

Please understand that this entire affair is making me as uncomfortable as
it is clearly making you.

Kind regards
Kevin R Davis


That must be it then.  I'll be glad to route the CAF, is the below the final document?
Thanks again,

Adriana
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 4:53 PM
To:	Wynn, Adriana
Subject:	RE: Draft Contract for Plant Protection Service Houston to New Orleans (Jode Corp)

I'm happy to look at another format.  This was the one Michelle gave me.

Kay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wynn, Adriana
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 4:50 PM
To:	Mann, Kay
Cc:	Grimm, Allan
Subject:	RE: Draft Contract for Plant Protection Service Houston to New Orleans (Jode Corp)

Kay,
I have everything I need with the exception of the wbs. coding, contact name, physical address and tax ID #.   I believe Allan is getting all that info for us.
We will be using this format from now on?
Best regards,

Adriana

From: 	Mann, Kay
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Wynn, Adriana
Subject:	FW: Draft Contract for Plant Protection Service Houston to New Orleans (Jode Corp)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bonhame, Brenda
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 2:49 PM
To:	Bonhame, Brenda; Wynn, Adriana; Mann, Kay
Cc:	Grimm, Allan
Subject:	RE: Draft Contract for Plant Protection Service Houston to New Orleans (Jode Corp)

I forgot to include the draft copy (it's been one of those days)

 << File: Interim Agreement for Jode Corp.doc >>


Latest version.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/07/2000 09:56
AM ---------------------------

"FAYE STEDMAN" <STEDF@andrews-kurth.com> on 11/03/2000 05:01:29 PM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Chris Cobb" <COBBC@andrews-kurth.com>, "PAUL PIPITONE"
<PIPIP@andrews-kurth.com>, "PETER THOMPSON" <THOMP@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: Blacklines, etc for GE Form Turbine Agreement

At the request of Peter Thompson, attached please find the blacklines of the
GE Form Turbine Agreement, the first showing changes from version 1 to
version 5; the second showing changes from version 3 to version 5.  Also
attached please find Exhibit N-3 as well as a memo summarizing questions and
comments pertaining to the agreement.

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call Peter
Thompson at (202) 662-2780 or reply via e-mail at pthompson@akllp.com.

 - 82651_1.DOC
 - 554888v3-v5.DOC
 - 554888v1-v5.DOC
 - 82660_1.DOC


The scheduled Station 3 maintenance has caused a restriction greater than
anticipated.  For that reason, the Kingsgate capacity will be further
limited to 2220 MMcf/d beginning with the Intra-day 1 cycle for Gas Day 4/26
and will remain in effect until further notice.

If you have any questions, please call our transportation coordinators at
(503) 833-4300.

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.


For your review today if possible, Supplemental Agreement anad Attachment A.

	Tracy Ngo
	12/07/2000 09:39 AM

		 To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wendy
Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: American Electric Power Service Corporation - cws

Please also add that the cp themselves are also measured against the 3rd
party cross default provision, in addition to the 9 utilities.

Thanks,
Tracy
---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT on 12/07/2000 07:44 AM
---------------------------

Tracy Ngo
12/07/2000 12:23 AM
To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L
Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Wendy Conwell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: American Electric Power Service Corporation - cws

David/Genia,

Attached please find the credit terms to insert into the draft EEI Master
Power Purchase & Sale Agreement between American Electric Power Service
Corporation ("AEPSC" as agent) and Enron Power Marketing, Inc.  Please note
that pursuant to AEPSC's status as agent for (9) utilities, the
covenants/financial reporting requirements noted herein will apply to any of
the (9) utilities listed in Sheet 2 of the attachment.  Sheet 3 contains the
current ratings of all (9) utilities and has been provided as additional
information for the sake of showing that all utilities are in compliance as
of today if measured by the proposed covenants.

Please call with any questions.

Regards,
Tracy
503-464-8755


Tanya:

I don't remember if I forwarded this on or not.  When we receive counterparties' paper, should we forward on to you or would you prefer we send them to Jay or someone else?

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Cooper, Chris" <Chris.Cooper@ElPaso.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Cooper+2C+20Chris+22+20+3CChris+2ECooper+40ElPaso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 12:48 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Cc:	Shuttee, John
Subject:	Enron North America & Coastal States Trading, Inc.  ISDA 8/3/01

Hello Marie, per our conversation this morning, please find attached Coastal
States Trading, Inc.'s standard schedules, along with a copy of our guaranty
format.  We prefer to make proposed changes directly on the electronic
version(as opposed to hard copy).  Please red-line the schedule on the PC,
put a draft date in the upper right hand corner of the first page of both
schedules, then email the schedules back to John Shuttee for review.  John
will handle all negotiations for this ISDA.  He can be reached at
713/420-3548 or john.shuttee@elpaso.com.

Thanks for attention to this matter.

CKC

 <<Coastal Guaranty Format (update).doc>>  <<ISDA CST CSA Schedule 2.doc>>
<<ISDA CST Master Schedule 3 - .doc>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************

 - Coastal Guaranty Format (update).doc
 - ISDA CST CSA Schedule 2.doc
 - ISDA CST Master Schedule 3 - .doc


Per Bass-
like last year we get 13 guys, one must remain on IR for the entire week.
Note - the person does not have to be injured.

Pickups and drops are every monday.

If you do not know how to add/drop, ask any of us from last year.
PL


Very impressive young Kate, we are all astounded and impressed by your superluous use of your extensive vocabulary in our emails

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Symes, Kate
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	DL-Portland Real Time Shift
Subject:	Vocabulary Lesson

Main Entry: su?per?flu?i?ty
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English superfluitee, from Middle French superfluit?, from Late Latin superfluitat-, superfluitas, from Latin superfluus
Date: 14th century
1 a : EXCESS , OVERSUPPLY b : something unnecessary or superfluous
2 : immoderate and especially luxurious living, habits, or desires
Bottom of Form 0

Kate Symes
Real Time Trading Support
Office/503-464-7744
Cell/503-819-2181
Fax/503-464-7996


I will call you about this matter this week.

	Robert Quick
	07/13/2000 05:11 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Goboil Trading A/S

Just to notify you that we have a dispute with the above company regarding
purchase from Globoil of gas condensate. The issue in dispute is a point of
construction of the agreement. The amount in dispute is around USD500,000.
Michael has agreed that we use Linklaters as the litigation lawyers; Globoil
is using Herbert Smith. tks


Start Date: 12/21/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


I have no changes from last week.  Sara

Elizabeth Serralheiro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
12/10/99 03:27 PM
To: John Novak/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sami
Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert H
George/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Bertone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, George
Frumkin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, vcferraz@elektro.com.br, Sara
Shackleton@ECT, Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Hopkinson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Andrea
Gavino/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary Ann
Oliveira/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gisele S
Braz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ana Cristina
Santos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cecilia
Morellato/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kaye Ellis@ECT
cc:
Subject: ESA Legal Management Meeting reports

Please send me your updated report not later than Monday at 5:00 p.m.

Regards,
Elizabeth.


FYI,  Forgot to cc you.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000 09:28
AM ---------------------------

Gerald Nemec
04/28/2000 08:59 AM
To: Michael J Legler/HOU/ECT@Enron, Mark Whitt/DEN/ECT@Enron
cc: Dan J Bump/DEN/ECT@Enron
Subject: Purchase Agreement Summary

Attached is the summary of ENA's take obligations under all the purchase
agreements to date in the Powder River Basin.  Please call to discuss.  Sorry
for the delay.


FYI: This draft bulletin describes the Temporary Reference Price Adjustment
Request Process to be used by NYISO in its market mitigation procedures,
including the automated mitigation procedure.

-----Original Message-----
From: PLemme@nyiso.com [mailto:PLemme@nyiso.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 4:32 PM
To: marketrelations@nyiso.com
Subject: Technical Bulletin # 68

Dear Market Participant,

Technical Bulletin # 68 - Temporary Reference Price Adjustment
Request Process - is being distributed for Market Participant
comment.  It will be posted to the NYISO web site 5 business days
from the date of this communication.

The purpose of our technical bulletins is to facilitate participation in the
NYISO by communicating various NYISO concepts, techniques, and
processes to Market Participants before they can be formally
documented in a NYISO manual.

Please forward comments on this Technical Bulletin via email to:

Peter Lemme
NYISO Customer Technical Services
plemme@nyiso.com

Market Relations
(518) 356-6060

(See attached file: Tech Bulletin 68.pdf)

 - Tech Bulletin 68.pdf


Paul Posoli  (VP?) heads up risk management/trading.  He is an ex Enron guy.
Saundra (sp?) Lockard is a contract admin. person.  I used to work with
Saundra at Meridian Oil.

"K. Bryan" <kbryan@mail.earthlink.net> on 07/21/2000 11:33:07 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

http://www.calpine.com/jobs/jobs.asp

have any names that i can send a resume to?

thanks.


FYI.... Jane Wilson is our government affairs person in Mumbai.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/17/2000 08:38 PM -----

	Jeffrey Sherrick
	12/15/2000 06:28 PM

		 To: Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mike Stewart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Larry Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jack Harmuth/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dominic Carolan/NA/Enron@ENRON, John
Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane Wilson/Enron@Gateway, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen Wallace/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: EGEP/EOGIL Customs Duty Inquiry on Offshore Production

We were served summons by the Customs Office in Surat asking for meetings
with our platform managers and on Dec.12th we sent two representatives
(operations mgr & legal) to answer their questions.  Over a two day period
they inquired about production and logistical issues and asked a number of
questions regarding product delivery points, pricing formulas, etc.   In
summary, they are trying to build a case that the gas and maybe even the
crude we sell in India is subject to a 10-12% customs duty since it is
produced outside of the 12 mile territorial limit.  They are trying to make
the case that we are importing the gas and oil into India.  Obviously this is
not the case and there is no merit for such consideration, but we don't want
to let this idea get entered as a show/cause filing against Enron and our
partners.  There would be remedies such as court or arbitration, but the
timing to resolve this is probably 1-2 years.  Furthermore, this issue would
most likely impact current efforts we have on-going.  Therefore, we are
taking the issue very seriously and plan to meet in Mumbai next Thursday to
chart an appropriate course of action.  Once we meet, we will get back to
Cliff and Jim Derrick regarding our recommendation on Thursday morning
December 21st Houston time.  Cliff and Jim, if you are planning to be out of
the office, please drop me an e-mail where you can be reached.

Meeting in Mumbai next Thursday will be Chris Walker of Linklaters, local
Indian counsel (Saberwal ?), myself, Mike Stewart, Dominic Carolan (EGEP
legal), and certain representatives from EOGIL.  We would also like to have
Jane Wilson(EIPL Gov't & Regulatory affairs for India) present if she is
available.  Jane it is not mandatory that you are present, but if you can't
attend could you send me an e-mail where I could reach you if necessary.  The
meeting will be at EOGIL's office and Fatima Samuel will confirm the time and
place once Chris Walker's schedule is known.  It is my understanding that
Chris Walker will be in India on Tuesday and Wednesday working with Wade's
group on other matters.

This issue came up originally in 1997 right after we started producing gas at
Tapti.  At that time we had 3 legal opinions prepared and the legal team
tells me the positions were very strong in our favor on a variety of fronts.
After a few meetings and a couple of letters the issue went away and never
resurfaced again until now.  We suspect that this issue has been an open item
since that time and for a variety of reasons (ongoing activities ?) someone
feels it needs to be checked off the list.  Hence, the revived interest at
this time.

The reason we are giving this such a high level of attention is probably
obvious, but the reason we want to act upon our plan immediately once we get
together next Thursday may seem less necessary.  However, today our office
received 3 more summons for 3 different people to report to Surat next
Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday.  This time they have asked for our
production manager, logistics manager and lead accountant.  We have requested
an extension due to the short notice and holiday season and expect to have it
granted, but we will not know if it is postponed before Monday.   (If we have
to go we will have legal counsel attend with the individuals named)  This
level of back to back activity for a government office at this time year is a
concern.  Going into the meeting with the legal guys on Thursday, we are
thinking that we need to have a highly respected person(such as Saberwal)
deliver  our message (to multiple groups, i.e., Surat customs, Ministry of
Finance, Mopng) as to the lack of validity for this potential claim and what
we would do if they proceed.   By Thursday I think we will have all of the
necessary "color" on this issue and with the team mentioned above we will be
able to develop the right plan of action.  However, due to the level of
interest and activity of the Surat Customs group, we anticipate that our
recommendation will be to move quickly, hence, my desire to contact Cliff and
Jim next Thursday for approval to proceed.

I have included Wade and Rebecca(EIPL) as well as Steve and John(PR) for
information purposes at this time.
This first stage plan we will be seeking approval for next Thursday will be
to meet with certain people in an attempt to keep this from becoming an
issue.  This should be a fairly quiet issue (for Indian standards) next week
and even the subsequent meetings that I'm anticipating would take place in
the following two weeks ought to be very low keyed items.  However, in India
you never know and considering some of the existing press of recent we should
get prepared and make sure we are co-ordinated.   John, following our
Thursday decision we should probably talk about our plan so if you'll leave
me a note where you can be reached, I'd appreciate it.

In summary, the odds are we will be able to manage this and it won't become a
big issue.  However, we need to take this very seriously and deal with it
proactively and quickly before someone files something without understanding
the consequences of the action.  I am leaving for India on Sunday and when
possible I will pick up my mail.  I will also be checking voicemail if you
need to leave a message.   I will be the Mumbai office on Tuesday, Thursday
and Friday and in Delhi on Wednesday.

Jeff


Dear Shirley
?
Further to our telephone conversation earlier  today, I am writing concerning
the GARP 2001 Convention, which will be held in  New York between 13th and
14th February.
?
I have set a new deadline for presentations to be  sent to me, which is
Friday 5th January. I am sure you can appreciate that  collating, arranging,
organising and printing over 80 presentations is a mammoth  logistical task,
hence why I require the presentations as soon as  possible.
?
Can I please have an indication of when I am likely  to receive Vince's
presentation? Below is the talk he has agreed to give (he has  also agreed to
chair the stream on Energy & Corporate Risk on Tuesday 13th  February):
?
Measuring Energy Risk -  Tackling Price Volatility, Adapting VaR, Scenario
Modeling and Regulatory  Requirements
- mean (or floor)  reversion

[IMAGE]

The  challenge of modeling price dynamics in the energy markets

 - bullit1.jpg


dont worry it is probably just an infatuation that will pass

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:19 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

that makes you an eve bigger brat.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:18 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

I know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:18 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

YOU ARE A BRAT!!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

whatever, ok if thats what you want me to believe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:16 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

quit flattering yourself.  it was a male looking at you and he told me!  how do you feel about that?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:16 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

stop lying, you dont have to be embarrased, I understand

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:15 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

then i guess it is a fact that a male was staring at you.

i am laughing so hard!!!! :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:13 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

I wasnt accusing you I was just stating a fact

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:13 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i can't tell because then you would acuse them of staring at you too.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no I dont know how it works, and who told you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

don't you have messenger

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

nobody told you, dont lie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:08 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

damn you caught me.  and for your information, i didn't notice it...someone told me about it!  so whatever to you mr. allergy man!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

if you werent always staring at me you wouldnt notice my eyes


Jeff - Given all the things Enron is going through, if there is anything I
can do,  just let me know.


this deal is contingent on credit - he'll let me know later today whether or
not it's a good trade.

thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 09:00 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing deal?

sorry Friday, 3/9

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/12/2001 10:52 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing deal?

what was the trade date on this?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 08:58 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing deal?

Prebon sent over a confirm for a deal where:
Enron (Mike Swerzbin) buys from PPL Montana Cal'04-Cal'06 25 mw of Mid-C at
$45.00 off-peak hours.

They did not tell me about this deal during checkout.  Can you please check
with Mike.

Thanks!!


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their VP. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000076650&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000076650
Request Create Date : 11/19/01 2:40:19 PM
Requested For       : punit.rawal@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Basic Energy
Resource Type       : Applications


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/06/2000
03:36 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Groves                           08/30/2000 12:41 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LNG

Vince,

Here are the models as I left them.  Please call with any questions.

The LNG model pulls from the LNG curves file.

Thanks,

Eric


liz:
are the diamonds still available for tonight's game?