---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/27/2001 12:30
PM ---------------------------

Kathleen Carnahan
03/27/2001 11:12 AM
To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Sun-Sentinel News.htm

There certainly was quite a turn-out at last night's meeting in Florida.

Kathleen

Home
News
Sports
Entertainment
Classified
Business
Weather
Shopping

INSIDE NEWS

National
South Florida
Cuba
Obituaries
Traffic
Lottery results
Education
Columnists
Photo Galleries

COMMUNITY INFO

Property Records
Multicultural Directory

CHANNELS

NEWS
South Florida, National, Columns, Obituaries

TRAFFIC

WEATHER

SPORTS
Dolphins, Marlins, Heat, Panthers, Fusion, High school, College,
BUSINESS

CLASSIFIED
Careers, Homes, Apartments, Cars, Personals

SHOPPING

TRAVEL

THE EDGE

ENTERTAINMENT
Dining, Movies, Events, Festivals, TV, Theater, Contests

FEATURES/LIFESTYLE
Food, Arts, Home & Garden, Books

OPINION

OTHER SERVICES
Map/directions, Archives, Newspaper customer service, News by email

500 pack hearing to protest power plant

By DAVID FLESHLER
Staff Writer
Posted March 27 2001

  Email this story to a friend
  Printer friendly version

		PHOTOS

DISCONTENT: (Melissa Lyttle/Staff)
Mar 27, 2001

		MORE HEADLINES

		Worried landscapers try to derail tough water restrictions
Senate advances bill to limit access to autopsy photos
FAU professor wants apology for wrongful theft arrest
Developer agrees to let workers unionize at planned convention center hotel
Jail inmate dies after nurses fail to take her pain complaint seriously

		More than 500 people packed the Pompano Beach Civic Center on Monday night in
a formidable display of opposition to Enron Corp.'s plans for a power plant
next to Florida's Turnpike.

Opponents arrived in buses chartered by condominiums. They came from
virtually all the cities of north Broward County, some holding signs, others
clutching notes for statements they wanted to make. They included a member of
Congress, two county commissioners and a parade of city officials.

Enron officials insisted they weren't jarred by the display of opposition.
But spokesman Eric Thode acknowledged he hadn't seen anything like it in
other parts of the United States where the company has built plants.

The hearing was called by the state Department of Environmental Protection to
take comments on the agency's preliminary decision to issue the company a
permit. The agency had found that the 510-megawatt plant would not harm the
region's air quality.

But few people in the crowd were buying that. They expressed suspicion about
Enron's promise to run the plant only as a part-time, backup facility. They
said the region didn't need the power and that the company would simply sell
it elsewhere. And they doubted whether state officials sitting onstage could
know everything about the possible harm the plant could cause.

"Don't let them tell us these chemicals are perfectly safe for us," said
Claire Hornstein, of Pompano Beach. "They do not know, and we're not naz?
enough to believe it."

Speakers expressed concern about their health and their children's health.

Craig Wolf, of Coconut Creek, said he had been in the hospital 47 times for
lung problems. He moved from Miami to escape the pollution, and now he fears
it will follow him to his current home.

"This could cause me to end up in the hospital," he said. "Please don't do
this project.

Dan Mackey, of Coconut Creek, arrived with a hand-drawn sign that read,
"Think of Our Kids. Stuff the Stacks." Aware of the company's political
influence, such as its close ties to President Bush, Mackey said he wondered
how much of a chance opponents had.

"We're afraid of Enron," said Mackey, who has a 10-year-old daughter. "We
don't feel we're in very good shape against them."

U.S. Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Fla., spoke against the project, asking the DEP
officials seated in front to consider public health first.

"I think the people in this room and every resident of Broward County is owed
a presumption that the state will give every benefit of the doubt to health,"
he said.

Also speaking against the plant were County Commissioners Kristin Jacobs and
Ilene Lieberman. A procession of mayors and commissioners from the cities
around Pompano Beach took turns at the microphone.

"I worry about the young kids with asthma and the seniors with emphysema,"
said Coconut Creek Commissioner Becky Tooley. "Are you going to take away
somebody's last breath just to make some money? I don't think so."

Thode, the Enron spokesman, expressed irritation at the statements from the
politicians.

"The thing that gets me is that we've met with these people, given them the
facts, and they continue to say things that are not true," he said. "Selling
outside the state of Florida -- not going to happen. The only way we operate
is when a utility needs the electricity."

The DEP is scheduled to work on its final permit. But four cities have filed
a request to delay the permit so they can petition for an administrative
hearing.

The real decision on whether the plant gets built could belong to the Pompano
Beach City Commission. The commission is scheduled to vote April 10 on
whether to rezone 28 acres for the plant from industrial to utility. At this
point, it appears the vote will be close.

"It's not what we need in our neighborhood," said Jim Story, of Deerfield
Beach. "It's not what we need for our families, for our health, our property
values. We don't like the traffic that the fuel trucks will cause. I've lived
here 30 years. I remember when they built the landfill, the incinerator.
Perhaps they'd like to put in a smelting plant."

David Fleshler can be reached at dfleshler@sun-sentinel.com or 954-356-4535.

		Copyright , 2001, South Florida Sun-Sentinel

				 Find a local merchant

  Enter a business
  name (optional):

  Need more options?   Try an advanced
  search.

Sun-Sentinel.com
Questions or comments? | Paid archives | Start a newspaper subscription
|Advertise online
Copyright 2001, Sun-Sentinel Co. & South Florida Interactive, Inc.

Powered by Genuity


Debelah Morgan!  She is really big in the Hip Hop world.  Come on....get with
the times here Gerald.

I am going to try and get out of here around 4:00.  I need to go get my car
washed, etc.  I am supposed to hear from Susie about that time.  She will
then let me know what time she is going to be downtown.  I hope you will come
along even if no one else wants to join in!  I know that a lot of people from
work are going to be out and about tonight, too.

You know we actually need to start spending time together outside of the
alcohol.  At least a little earlier than 10:00 at night.  I really don't even
know if I like you.  Ha! Ha!

Well, I looked at my work schedule and those dates should work.  I just need
to talk to Judi.  We will be in the middle of month end, but I am thinking
that everything could be finished by that time.

I'll talk with you in a little bit!


Hi Vince,

	Amitava and I have received a request to build a non-firm power curve for each region from David Hoog's Double Trigger folks.  The objective, as they explain it, is to allow the Desk to buy non-firm from the market, buy David's outage product, and sell firm to the market.  Accountants would like a curve to mark the non-firm position.
	My initial thought is that the desk should provide this non-firm curve, but it seems that this market is very illiquid and they are reluctant so they have put the ball in David Hoog's court to build the curve if David wants to sell his product internally to the desk.
	Assuming we build the curve, the next issue is how to define "non-firm"?  The only way I can think of is to tie the non-firmness to a specific generation unit or group of units.  This will allow the purchase of David's outage product to cover the non-firmness risk.  Tying the definition of non-firmness to a whole region seems implausible --- what does it mean to give a marketer the option to not deliver power if there is any problem anywhere in the region?  Consequently, the non-firm curve takes on a unit-level interpretation, and not a region-level interpretation.  Consequently, I do not see how we can talk about the "non-firm curve for the region"?  We will need to build a non-firm curve for each generation unit or group of units.

Maybe I could get your thoughts later today.

Thanks,

Vasant


that was great.  that is as funny as i get.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000 08:58 AM -----

	Laurel Adams
	09/13/2000 08:54 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: "Other Agreements" in Lotus Notes

It's Jorge Garcia--with a "J"  Sorry, SHould have specified that earlier...


Itinerary for each of the Super Saturdays.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 12:57 PM
---------------------------

Corina Taylor@ENRON
10/25/2000 10:29 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Candidate Itinerary

Information you requested.  I hope this helps....Corina
---------------------- Forwarded by Corina Taylor/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000
10:28 AM ---------------------------

Shelly Jones@ECT
10/20/2000 03:26 PM
To: Dolores Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Nyegaard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Alison Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alyse Herasimchuk/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul LeBeau/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristin
Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky Bruce/NA/Enron@ENRON, Beth
Miertschin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geynille Dillingham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacqueline
Coleman/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lexi Elliott/NA/Enron@Enron, Corina
Taylor/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Candidate Itinerary

Just as an fyi, the attached is the candidate itinerary.  Questions are
coming in - you can use this for a guide of how the weekend will go for them.

Shelly


Are you going to Las Vegas today to see you mom or are you waiting to see if
she gets better?  Can't get a hold of Barb on the cell phone.


If your do not see our email in 15 seconds, please go to http://www.enerfaxdaily.com to today's gas & power prices & news.
If your email does not support this web version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com <mailto:subscribe@enerfax.com> Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by clicking <http://www.enerfax.com>

Delete scorman@enron.com by forwarding to web@enerfax.com or send a blank email to leave-enerfaxdaily-800678X@relay.netatlantic.com


Hi Harry,

Thanks a lot buddy.

Here is my updated resume, for the industrial markets
potential opportunities you mentioned.

Let us chat on the weekend in detail if that
works for you.

Cheers,

Gurmeet


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Allen Howe" <amcars@iglou.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:16 PM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	http://server3003.freeyellow.com/automatch/94Por3.6T.html

http://server3003.freeyellow.com/automatch/94Por3.6T.html


Due to name corrections and by request, the following short names will be
changed in GCP tomorrow, December 6, after 1:p CST.  The changes to the legal
names were made on the dates indicated.

If there is any objection, please let me know.

Thanks,

Cheryl x3-3103


Could you please put together a combined presentation : Enron's strategy and
the need for open access on the transmission system?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
09:18 AM ---------------------------

"Steve Reynolds" <SREYNO@state.wy.us> on 05/23/2001 09:40:11 AM
To: <skean@enron.com>
cc: <sland@enron.com>

Subject: Wyoming Energy Commission subject

Steve, it was great to meet you and hear your remarks yesterday.  For the
speaking engagement next Wednesday, I would like you to focus upon the Enron
strategic model of virtual integration of market forces in the evolution of
energy development.  Wyoming represents a huge material resource base and the
commission is charged with the development and promotion of such.  But the
Governor's message is that we cannot see ourselves as producers and exporters
in the traditional sense.  We will continue to have the status of a colony if
we do not recognize the new dynamics of how these market places are
evolving.  If you set the stage with a presentation of Enron strategy, then
we will discuss how a state, with its agencies and auathority can play a role
in this evolution.  I have set your time for 45 minutes, which can include a
short Qand A period.  But your message can be as succint as you can make it
and get the point across.  You may have to present the Enron case a number of
different ways, but the Governor will give you latitude to make the point.
You will be welcome to participate in a following panel which will address
role playing by the state and the commission.  Plan to join us for lunch.  If
you need more detail, let me know.  Thanks!  Stephen


Gary:  Thanks for the redraft.  Would you please send the swap termination
format for the Transaction so that I can review it together with the
Transaction confirm?  Thanks.  Sara

	"Rosenblum, Gary(CICG-GEDNY)" <grosenbl@exchange.ml.com>
	09/14/2000 03:37 PM

		 To: "'sara.shackleton@enron.com'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "Barna, Peter (CICG - Equity Linked Capital Markets)"
<pbarna@exchange.ml.com>, "Payton-Jacobs, Leslie (OGC)"
<LPayton-Jacobs@exchange.ml.com>, "Grasso, Anthony (CICG - NY Equity Ops)"
<AGrasso@exchange.ml.com>
		 Subject: Swap Agreement

Sara,
Hope all is well by you.
Attached is a marked and clean draft of the confirmation for the Swap
Transaction, revised to reflect our discussion on your comments. I note that
the confirmation retains the Change in Law provision (with marked changes)
for this Transaction. We agree to discuss further the Change in Law
provision in respect of future Transactions. Please call/email me with any
comments.
Regards
 <<Enron swap 091400cmp.doc>>  <<Enron swap 091400.doc>>

 - Enron swap 091400cmp.doc
 - Enron swap 091400.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 11:44
AM ---------------------------
From: Matthew Lenhart on 02/23/2001 03:11 PM
To: Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Monique Sanchez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul T Lucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fortune Article

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001
03:09 PM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Fortune Article

---------------------- Forwarded by Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES on 02/22/2001
04:45 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Timothy Blanchard                           02/22/2001 04:24 PM
	Phone No: 713-853-4755

To: AIP
cc:
Subject: Fortune Article

The article just discussed on CNNfn.


don't think so. Assume they wish to transact UK financial crude and oil,
rather than physical. tks

From: Tana Jones on 12/10/2000 17:23 CDT
To: Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

Any problem?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 05:23 PM -----

	Alan Aronowitz
	10/12/2000 05:17 PM

		 To: Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

Tana:

Please check with Robert Quick on this. Thanks.

Alan

	Harry M Collins
	10/12/2000 12:29 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

I do not know of any reason that they should not be able to transact UK oil
and products. However, it would be best to also check with London on this
request.

	Tana Jones
	10/12/2000 11:55 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

I don't see any problem with this request, do you?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 11:55 AM -----

	Stephanie Sever
	10/12/2000 11:31 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

Please let me know if this request is OK?

Thanks,
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
11:27 AM ---------------------------

Brant Reves
10/12/2000 11:19 AM
To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

We are ok with this request for Utilicorp United, Inc.

brant

From:  Stephanie Sever
     10/12/2000 10:52 AM

To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK crude
and oil products

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
10:48 AM ---------------------------

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     10/12/2000 10:20 AM

To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK crude
and oil products

Tom -

What do you think?

Thanks,
Griff
x35753


Great!  I'll arrange it with Donna!   Melinda arranged the video conference
on 32.  See you there!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001
10:23 AM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
01/24/2001 09:47 AM
To: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Mid-Project Review dates-Enron

Christie,

Feb the 20th is the best time for me.

Vince

Christie Patrick
01/23/2001 11:29 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Mid-Project Review dates-Enron

Hi Vince!

The best dates for me are the 16th or the 20th.

Please let me know!

Thanks!

--Christie.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT on 01/23/2001
11:29 PM ---------------------------

FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu> on 01/23/2001 11:46:32 AM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>, "'christie.patrick@enron.com'"
<christie.patrick@enron.com>
cc: FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu>
Subject: Mid-Project Review dates-Enron

Tiger Hosts:

This is a reminder that the deadline for setting up the Mid-Project review
dates for your Tiger Team is Friday, Jan 26.
The following are the remaining available dates/times.  Please let me know
what works best for you at your earliest convenience.

Monday, Feb 12    4:30-6:30  or 6:30-8:30

Tuesday, Feb 13   4:30-6:30  or 6:30-8:30

Wed., Feb 14        4:30-6:30  or 6:30-8:30

Friday, Feb 16      10:00-12:00  or 6:30-8:30

Tuesday, Feb 20   6:30-8:30

Again, this will be based on a first come-first serve basis. You may come to
campus or this can be done by videoconference.  If you choose the latter,
please provide to me a call-in number for the conference.

Any questions, please contact the FAP office.

Donna Piazze
Program Director
Field Application Project
The Wharton School
Univ. of Pennsylvania
215.573.8394   fax 215.573.5727
fap@management.wharton.upenn.edu
piazze@wharton.upenn.edu


Vince: I would appreciate your comments.
Thanks
Krishna.


At the request of Bob Shults, I am attaching our proposed form of Letter of
Interest.   If the enclosed meets with your approval, please execute the
agreement and return it to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490.  I will then have
it executed by Enron Net Works.  If you have any comments or questions please
call Mark Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at (713) 345-8897 or Bob at (713)
853-0397.  We look forward to hearing from you.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/16/2000
05:49 PM ---------------------------

"Gould, Aaron" <Aaron.Gould@pseg.com> on 06/16/2000 02:54:03 PM
To: "'vkamins@enron.com'" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Dr. Kaminski,

On Wednesday, June 14th I attended your presentation entitled "THE CHALLENGE
OF VALUATION OF ENERGY RELATED DERIVATIVES" at the Risk 2000 conference in
Boston.  Can you please e-mail me the slides you presented.

Also, you mentioned that the method you used to calculate volatility for
energy prices was not the "normal" method.  Can you please tell me, or give
me a reference to the method that you did use.

Thank you,

Aaron Gould
Senior Risk Management Analyst
PSEG Services Corporation
Aaron.Gould@pseg.com
1-973-456-3527


---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron on 12/01/2000
08:33 AM ---------------------------

	Enron de Mexico

	From:  Barbara Martinez                           11/30/2000 07:51 PM

To: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jaime Williams/NA/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Meeting with Cementos de Chihuahua

Just to inform you  in case you want to join Jaime Williams, the Meeting with
Cementos Chihuahua it is scheduled next Tuesday, December 5  at 11:00 a.m.
And  will take place in the Cementos Chihuahua's office.

Address:
Vicente Su?rez y 6a. Avenida
Chihuahua, Chih.
Ph. (14)24-0090 /(14)24-0408

If you need of further assistance, please let me know.

Regards,
Barbara


Attached please find the Natural Gas market analysis for today.

Thanks,

Bob McKinney

 - 10-11-01 Nat Gas.doc


See Attached File

 - report.rtf


Mark -

thanks for the response.

I agree with you that identifying all of the Regulatory Risks associated with
either a specific asset (e.g., Sutton Bridge) or a trading book (e.g., UK
gas) is impossible.  We could have 50 people spending 100% of their time
sitting around dreaming up 'what-ifs' and still not see everything.  On the
other hand, as your team does now, once we have been able to identify
reasonable risks, it is more than appropriate to attempt to impute /
calculate the potential loss and assign people to mitigate these risks.

On the flip side of the risk coin, the process of identifying Regulatory Risk
should also allow Govt Affairs, working with our business colleagues,  to
identify rule changes / policy changes that could positively impact our
bottom line.  For instance, we could push through regulatory action for a
retail rate decrease providing EES with more commodity margin.

I don't disagree that these risks which I am trying to track are business
risks.  But they are fundamentally the result of changes in regulatory policy
(taxes, export/import, rates, etc.).  Because Enron is actively participating
in many regulated or semi-regulated environments, regulatory risks are
business risks.

Finally, it is my understanding that Govt Affairs needs to be involved in
assisting our business people in managing these risks.  To this end, the
Regulatory Risk Working Group has identified the following set of
responsibilities for Govt Affairs:

_ To identify Regulatory Risks within current assets.
_ To analyze pending transactions for Regulatory Risks.
_ To recommend alternative commercial arrangements to reduce Regulatory Risk.
_ To assess and compute &value at risk8 for each Regulatory Risk.
_ To develop transfer mechanisms for Regulatory Risk (e.g., insurance).
_ To propose and/or plan mitigation devices for Regulatory Risks.
_ To assign EGA and/or commercial responsibility and resources for mitigation
efforts.
_ To review mitigation efforts against existing plans.
_ To advocate regulatory frameworks which reduce Regulatory Risk (e.g., BIT).
_ To prevent catastrophic Regulatory Risk events (> $25 MM).
_ To report to Enron management global Regulatory Risk position.
_ To coordinate knowledge with other risk groups within Enron.

I look forward to seeing you when you are in Houston and discussing this
further.  Like you, I don't want to create some process that provides little
to no value.

JDS

Mark Schroeder@ECT
02/10/2000 03:17 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon
Killey/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets

yes, let's meet.  I will have Sharon try to put something in the diary.

I would suggest the hardest part is "anticipating" these changes.  here are
some examples:  UK Climate Change Levy, even other Government Departments in
the UK are not allowed to kow what is in the Budget until the Chancellor
delivers it to Parliament.  Turkish fuel consumption tax, I believe, was
modified without prior notice.  In Romania, Doug Wood met with the Energy
Minister on the proposed Gas Decree, and 2 days later they passed another
draft of the decree, which had been rejected before Christmas, verbatim.  Tom
Briggs can tell you that the annual revenue formula for BG TransCo, which
affects all of our UK assets, can swing up or down by 10% per annum, and
cannot be predicted/modelled (we and our consultants have tried).  Decisions
by Polish regulator to price regulate generation in Poland, notwithstanding
our PPA, was another example.  The list goes on.  I remain a sceptic that all
of these risks, or even many of them, can be "identified" a priori.  Once we
fact them, we do assess/mitigate.  In Europe, I think we accept these as
"business" risks, that the regulatory team responds to.   mcs

James D Steffes@EES
09/02/2000 21:02
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets

Mark --

Thanks for the additions.  I will add to the Asset / Responsibility Matrix.

The definition I have been using is that Regulatory Risk is a subset of
Sovereign Risk (with the other element being Political Risk).  Regulatory
Risk is a "legal" action taken by a government or its agent which modifies
Enron's business environment, most often directly through modifications in
the energy and communications markets, but also in broad areas such as taxes
and export - import policies.  Political Risk is a "supra-legal" action that
has the same impact (e.g., expropriation).

Currently the Regulatory Risk Working Group (Fiona Grant is member) is trying
to put in place a "standard" process to review and analyze regualtory risk
around the globe - quite an undertaking.  When I use the term Regulatory Risk
Management, I am primarily talking about such a process.  The key elements of
any risk management function are (1) identification, (2) assessment, (3)
mitigation / transference, and (4) audit.  You would probably agree that the
most difficult problem is to try and assess the impact of any Regulatory Risk
event.  The other key goal is to have a Mitigation Plan in place with an
assigned person to "manage" our activities so that Enron does not face an
associated loss.

My goal is to try an have this process in place by mid-year.  That would
include having undertaken a structured review of our current Assets (the
reason for the original questions) and the ability to review pending deals.

When you come over to Houston next week I would really like to sit down and
go through my thoughts with you.

Thanks.

JDS

Mark Schroeder@ECT
02/09/2000 05:48 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Fiona
Grant/LON/ECT@ECT, Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets

Jim - overnight I realised you need to add our project in Turkey (Fiona
Grant) and Poland (Philip Davies).  I have not given you any one person, as
the regulatory issues seem to be country/environment specific, and instead I
have given you the names of each person with country responsibility.  Indeed,
at year-end we completed a financial transaction (Project Margaux), in which
regulatory risk was reviewed.  A definition of Rugulatory Risk would be
helpful, e.g., in most of these markets, trading arrangements are being
re-written, or developed for the first time, this put existing PPAs under
pressure.  Would energy taxes, carbon taxes/trading, transmission pricing
(both for evacuation of power, and delivery of gas), changes in property
tax/fuel tax regimes, risk of price regulation, all be included?  Do you have
checklist?  We can identify these risks, what is meant by "manage"?  We work
on these types of issues on a daily basis, so I am unclear as to what else is
intended or implied.  thanks  mcs

James D Steffes@EES
08/02/2000 17:24
To: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Assignment of Regulatory Risk Responsibility for Current Assets

Rick & Mark --

One of the first steps in building our Regulatory Risk process is to
establish responsibility for the current assets owned/managed by Enron.
Having a point person that I can contact will help me immensely.

Attached is a listing of the assets that I have been able to pull together --
there may be more that you know about.

Is it possible for us to agree upon the person(s) who will manage the
Regulatory Risk with each of these assets?  Please feel free to call me to
discuss.

I would like to have this assignment process complete within the month.

The same type of effort will be necessary as we review pending transactions.

Thanks.


PAC@CHOLLA-APS(T)CHOLLA/WW O#1198 F-PACW-APS(T)WW/MEAD5 O# 1197
F-PACW-AZPS(T)MEAD 500/ MEAD230 O#1210 F-PACE-
EPMI-METRPOLWA-SCETAG<ISO(T)MEAD230/CISOSYS(EPMI_CA_010)<CISOSYS .  50mw LLH
at Mead.

See MISC_JAN_P sheet, line 57.  This schedule is going real-time due to cuts
that happened.  Metropolitan Water called looking for a tag,
but I told him Real-time doesn't need to do LLH tags yet.  He is fine with
that and knows that if there is a problem he will call our real time desk.

Donald.


Tana:  A lawyer from Amerada Hess (Dana Dellacona) will probably call you
about EOL trading.  She is interested in several trading relationships which
you can see from the email that I sent to Tanya.  Let me know if you have any
questions.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/13/2001 09:20 AM -----

	Sara Shackleton
	02/07/2001 05:29 PM

		 To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC ("Hess") and affiliates

I have received the following request from a Hess lawyer:

ECT and Hess have an executed ISDA effective 1/29/98.

Guess what they want?  The following ISDA agreements to trade financial (and
PHYSICAL):

(1)  Amerada Hess Corp.   and  ENA
(2)  Hess Energy Services Company, LLC and  ENA
(3)  Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC  and  ELFI
(4)  Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC  and ECT Singapore Pte. Ltd.
(5)  Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC  and ECTRIC

I explained our financial trading entities.
She did not know what products each of the Hess affiliates would be trading.
Hess CREDIT:  Grim Trivino at 212-536-8979
Hess LEGAL:  Dana Dellacona at 212-536-8133

Please let me know who will handle in credit (and I'll intercede with the
lawyer).  TO MY KNOWLEDGE, NOBODY AT ENRON IS PUSHING HESS.
As usual, thanks for your help.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000 03:15
PM ---------------------------

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 11/30/2000 01:24:15 PM
To: "Mann, C. Kay" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>

Subject: FW: Letter Agreement

Here it is-welcome to the fray!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keffer, John
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 1:10 PM
> To: Zisman, Stuart
> Cc: Campbell, Carolyn
> Subject: Letter Agreement
>
> Attached is a draft of the Letter Agreement for your review.  Also
> attached is a version marked against the Letter Agreement used in the Air
> Liquide transaction.
>
> Regards
>
> John L. Keffer
> King & Spalding
> 713 751 3255
> 713 751 3280 (fax)
> jkeffer@kslaw.com
>
>  <<Letter Agmt C A Energy Dvlpmt I LLC.DOC>>  <<Redlined Letter
> Agreement.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Letter Agmt C A Energy Dvlpmt I LLC.DOC
 - Redlined Letter Agreement.DOC


The fuel valve replacement is scheduled for April 2nd, in order to accommodate everyone's schedule, contractors, Solar representatives, regional field engineers, etc..  This will coincide with our annual turnaround, which is scheduled for April 2nd through the 5th.  Unit A-102 is currently running in the normal solonox mode to prevent any compliance issues, but is being operated at a reduced RPM.  Hopefully this will satisfy all interests until repairs can be made.  If you have any questions, please call us @ (970) 259-8238.

From:	Jerry Graves/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/12/2002 12:34 PM CST
To:	Gary Choquette/ENRON@enronXgate, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team San-Juan-LaPlata/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Todd Ingalls/ENRON@enronxgate
cc:	Darrell Schoolcraft/ENRON@enronXgate, Ben Asante/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: La Plata Unit Fuel Valve Change-out

I don't have an outage for fuel valve replacement yet. Would that need to be done during the scheduled turn around?

Jerry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Choquette, Gary
Sent:	Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:38 AM
To:	Roensch, David; San-Juan-LaPlata, Team; Ingalls, Todd
Cc:	Graves, Jerry; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Asante, Ben
Subject:	La Plata Unit Fuel Valve Change-out

Has there been an outage scheduled to replace the fuel valve on unit 2 at La Plata?

Todd, where do we stand with the station control modifications?


Team:

We will be meeting with Sr. Mgmt of AEP during the next several days.  I have
prepared a list of items that we need to cover.  Please reply with any
comments/additions.

Regards,
Brian


If you could also let me know if you can get 4 tickets at the Cinergy Field
box for opening day on Monday the 3rd.  The game is at 1:00pm on Sunday!
Thanks!
Ben


Following please find the new Weekly Management report and the Daily
Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 10/13/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	2,512
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,567
Total Life to Date Transactions	357,560

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 	10/13/00
Enron North America	76%
Enron Europe Limited	31%
GLOBAL PRODUCTS	22%
Enron Metals	8%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	44%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	1,617,383,844
MTD	19,268,239,170
LTD	187,960,473,442
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	1,727,649,709

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	13,158,039,070

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	512
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	3
Number of Products Offered Today	1,111
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,485
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,497

Also attached is the Weekly Public Domain Report, containing information
which is intended for use in presentations or reports which will be seen by
individuals outside Enron.


If your do not see our email in 15 seconds, please go to http://www.enerfaxdaily.com to today's gas & power prices & news.
If your email does not support this web version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com <mailto:subscribe@enerfax.com> Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by clicking <http://www.enerfax.com>

Delete scorman@enron.com by forwarding to web@enerfax.com or send a blank email to leave-enerfaxdaily-800678X@relay.netatlantic.com


your retarded.  i used to have one.  they are great dogs.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

cockerspaniels are retarded.  why do you think i should get one of those?

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:36 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

i think they are all bark and no bite.  i think they could get their asses
kicked by cats.  they look like they were doberman pinchers who were
shrunk.  you should get a cockerspaniel.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
NRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:25 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   no, i am not kidding and no i don't want it b/c of the taco bell dog.  i
   want it b/c it is really small and cute.  i knew someone in college who
   had
   one and i loved it.  why do you think they are mean?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:20 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   are you kidding?  why would you want a chihuahua?  those dogs aren't
   even
   friendly.  do you think they are cool b/c of the taco bell dog?

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
   NRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:29 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      what's a furry dog?  i have to get a small dog b/c my apt. is small.
   i
      want
      a chihuahua.   they aren't furry and they have personality.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:23 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      it depends what type you get.  if you get one of those little furry
   dogs
      that you can carry with you everywhere, then i can't like that dog.
   if
      you
      get one with personality like a bulldog it can stay at my place.
   those
      little furry dogs act like cats.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
      NRON@ENRON.com]

         Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:13 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         no!  you are so mean.  why would you ever want to kick a precious
      little
         puppy?

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:12 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         only if i have a bad day.  if i have a bad day will you let me
   come
      over
         and kick it?

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
         NRON@ENRON.com]

            Sent:   Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:06 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            i don't know, i can't decide if i should get one or not.   my
   mom
         called
            some places for me today but she didn't find much.  are you
   going
      to
         be
            mean
            to it?

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
            Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:04 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject:

            when are you getting your dog dog?

   **********************************************************************
            This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
         affiliate
            and
            may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
   use
      of
         the
            intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
      disclosure
         by
            others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
      recipient
         (or
            authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
      sender
         or
            reply
            to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
      delete
            all
            copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
      are
         not
            intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
         evidence
            a
            binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
      its
            affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and
   may
         not
            be
            relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
         otherwise.
            Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


This is ok.  I sold them 767 for the 27th and 28th.  I told Bryan to make
sure he doesn't need the 767 for the 29th - 31st.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000 09:21
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Joann Collins @ ENRON                           01/28/2000 07:28 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CKY 18-12 1/28 - 1/31

---------------------- Forwarded by Joann Collins/Corp/Enron on 01/28/2000
07:28 AM ---------------------------

mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com on 01/28/2000 06:52:20 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: "        -         *Swogger, Joanne" <jswogge@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
"        -         *Perrone, Brian" <bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>

Subject: CKY 18-12 1/28 - 1/31

I am requesting an additional 33 dth per day starting today going to the above
referenced ldc.   Please let me know the k# as soon as possible.   Thanks.


Take me off your mail list

JobOpps@idrc.org on 09/05/2000 03:37:13 PM
To: jarnold@ei.enron.com
cc:
Subject: Job Opportunities from IDRC

IDRC Job Opportunity Posting

DATE RECEIVED: September 05, 2000

POSITION: Property Director
COMPANY: Regus Business Centre Corp.
LOCATION: Northeast  USA

For complete details go to:
http://site.conway.com/jobopps/jobdetail.cfm?ID=83
To see all job postings go to: http://site.conway.com/jobopps/jobresult.cfm


Chris is the CES expert .
---------------------- Forwarded by Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2000
10:08 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/28/2000 09:07 AM

To: Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hunt Petroleum

The contract for Hunt Petroleum has been assigned from CES to Enron.  I need
someone to change the names on deals 136863, 135898 and 136845 from CES-Hunt
Petroleum to Hunt Petroleum (without CES).  All of the deals are on the East
desk.  Let me know if this request is to go to one of you or if I need to
forward this to someone else.

Thanks,
Megan


Borderline
No.  2001-22
October 30, 2001<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

November 1 Tariff Change

Tariff revisions detailing and addressing the use of an Operational Flow Order (OFO) on Northern Border, which were part of Northern Border's approved Park and Loan (PAL) filing, will become effective on November 1.   Here is a brief overview of the upcoming changes.

Purpose of an OFO

An OFO will be used by Northern Border to 1) alleviate conditions that threaten the integrity of the system, 2) maintain pipeline operations at pressures required to provide efficient and reliable transportation service, 3) assure adequate system line pack, and 4) maintain service for all of Northern Border's firm shippers.

An OFO will be treated as a tool of last resort.  Northern Border will first attempt to utilize its system, its services (transportation and PAL), and if necessary, assistance of interconnecting systems to alleviate operational problems before invoking its OFO tariff provisions.

Posting of an OFO Watch

If resolution of an operational problem is unlikely, such as when a daily or cumulative OBA imbalance with an interconnected party is outside of a defined tolerance range, Northern Border will post an OFO watch.  Similar to a severe weather notice, the purpose of an OFO watch is to pre-alert shippers and interconnecting systems to a location or area on Northern Border's system in which underlying operational conditions could prompt the issuance of an OFO.

OFO Issuance

Northern Border will issue an OFO if it is determined that an OFO watch has failed to serve as a catalyst for corrective action.

A Northern Border OFO will be as localized as is reasonably possible.  Furthermore, each OFO will be tailored to match the severity of the known or anticipated problem being addressed.

OFO Impact

An OFO can result in either the curtailment of interruptible services and/or the forced balancing of nominations and actual flows through the confirmation process.

If service is reduced or interrupted due to an OFO, Northern Border will directly provide affected shippers, as soon as possible, a summary of the service interruption that will include the operational variables that prompted such action.  In addition, affected shippers will be notified of any imbalances that require immediate resolution.

Routine status updates will be posted throughout the period in which the OFO is in effect.

Failure to Comply

When an OFO is issued, it is the responsibility of the affected shippers to make a good faith effort to comply.  If such shippers fail to respond to the OFO, or their response is insufficient to correct the problem, Northern Border may take further action including the curtailment of firm service or the immediate cash out of cumulative imbalances that are in excess of 10% of the Historical Flow Quantity.

Northern Border will not be liable for any costs incurred by a shipper in complying with or be exposed to any damages that result from an interruption in service due to an OFO.

Impact of OFO Tariff Changes on Interconnects

FERC Order No. 637 requires that pipelines "take all reasonable actions to minimize the issuance and adverse impact of Operational Flow Orders (OFOs)."  Northern Border recognizes that maintaining daily and cumulative OBA imbalances with its interconnected parties within reasonable tolerances levels is critical in meeting such obligation across the grid.  Consequently, the November 1 tariff changes includes language which define what is an acceptable tolerance range on a Northern Border OBA imbalance.

To serve as a benchmark, Northern Border has already begun calculating a Historical Flow Quantity (HFQ) for each point of interconnection on Northern Border's system.  The HFQ is the lesser of the average daily scheduled quantity for the previous 15 consecutive Gas Days or the actual daily flow quantity for such time period.

On November 1, the default cumulative OBA imbalance tolerance level for a given interconnect on Northern Border's system will be +/- 10% of the point's HFQ.   If such approach fails to meet the needs of an interconnected party, Northern Border's tariff does permit the use of an alternative tolerance level at a given point of interconnect as long as it has been mutually agreed to both OBA parties.

Furthermore, the daily OBA swings at interconnects on Northern Border that are on pressure control will also be monitored more closely; the default daily OBA imbalance tolerance level will be +/- 5% of the daily scheduled quantity.  Once again, Northern Border's tariff does permit deviation from this "standardized" daily tolerance if an alternative method is mutually acceptable to the OBA parties.

For those who would like to initiate discussions on establishing OBA imbalance tolerance levels with Northern Border that deviate from the defaults described above, please contact Scott Coburn at (402) 398.7760.


What's everyone's availability for a strategy session Jan 9/10

I would like to get everyone together and debate what action we need to
follow for any upcoming hearings / proceedings.

Is there anyone else we should invite?

Scott


---------------------- Forwarded by Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2000 05:02
PM ---------------------------

Brent A Price
04/25/2000 02:05 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eugenio
Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne
Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Templeton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G
Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Inga
Latson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cecilia
Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Jordan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Organizational Changes

Please forward this e-mail to your teams regarding recent organizational
changes within Gas Operations.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/16/2000 08:59
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/16/2000 08:17 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse

Meant to copy you.

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 11/16/2000
08:16 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/16/2000 08:16 AM

To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Westinghouse

I talked with Westinghouse this morning.  They have some minor changes to the
agreement.  They'll have the changes back this afternoon.  If the changes
reflect what they described on the phone, then we'll be ready to sign
tomorrow morning.

Mike, are you in tomorrow to sign?

Mitch


Let me tell, that is one 225 pound pitiful soul when he is sick.  He has a
head cold, so he is going home to go to  bed.  He will sigh and  moan, and
carry on like you wouldn't believe.  He will be incapable of discussing
anything other than how he feels.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 11/01/2000 11:19 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: conference call

Will do!  Neil called and he sounds like he feels awful!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	11/01/2000 11:15 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: conference call

At 330 please get Sarah and Heather Brown (Bracewell) on the phone for me,
then I'll get Gregg.

Thanks,

kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 11/01/2000 10:23 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: conference call

Kay, I told him the meeting was at 3:30 and that you would be calling him.
He also wanted Sara Wesner on the call x35261.  I also told her you would
call her.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	11/01/2000 09:52 AM

		 To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: (bcc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Re: conference call

Gregg,

Sorry, I thought Suzanne had confirmed it. We are on for 330.  I can call you.

Kay

From: Gregg Penman on 11/01/2000 09:49 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: conference call

is there a call in # for the 3:30 or will you be initiating it?

Gregg


This request has been com[pleted.  Please call if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Jennifer Blevins
Risk Controls
713-345-2465


John,

Connectiv and Idacorp have been approved; Paribas does not trade on EOL;
Vitol is declined due to weak credit.  We'll get back to you with the others
soon.  I left a message for Dave Forster as well.

Tanya

John Griffith@ENRON
01/16/2001 01:44 PM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rejected for Options

FYI,

Here is a list of counterparties the were rejected for options.  Thanks for
your help.

John Griffith
---------------------- Forwarded by John Griffith/Corp/Enron on 01/16/2001
01:42 PM ---------------------------

Mike Maggi
01/16/2001 01:42 PM
To: John Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Rejected for Options

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Maggi/Corp/Enron on 01/16/2001 01:41
PM ---------------------------

David Forster
01/12/2001 06:51 PM
To: Savita Puthigai/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jason Althaus/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Rejected for Options

Please note the following companies which were on Mike's list have been
rejected by credit for access on EnronOnline.

However, Credit have stated that if we are doing options OTC with these
companies, we should be doing them online and they will review the rejections
on Tuesday:

AEP
Calpine
Connectiv
Engage
Entergy
Idacorp
Oneoak
Paribas
Sempra
Tractabel
Vitol

Dave


Dead deal. See previous e-mail.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
12/05/2000 07:26 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Another Chris Mallory Missing Deal

Prebon sent over another confirmation for this non-verbaled deal:

Enron sells to Pacificorp Dec 6- Dec 31 25 Mw of Mid-C at $551.00


Dear GISB Members & Interested Industry Participants,

The GISB industry comment period begins today and ends on May 31 for the
recommendations following recommendations:  R97064D, R98031, R98035B, R98085,
R99035, R99050 and the Minimum Guidelines recommended by the Future
Technology Task Force.  Subcommittees and task forces submitted the
recommendations for your review on April 26, April 27, May 1 and May 2.

A brief description of the recommendations is attached with the announcement
of the comment period and the recommendations themselves can be accessed from
the GISB Web site.  Due to the number of pages (194), the recommendations
follow in a separate email, which can be downloaded at your convenience
should you choose to do so.

All comments received by the GISB office by end of business May 31 will be
posted on the Home Page and forwarded to the Executive Committee (EC) members
for their consideration.  The EC members will consider all comments and are
scheduled to cast their votes on these recommendations on June 15 at the EC
meeting at the offices of Boeing in Seattle, Washington.

If you have difficulty retrieving this document, please call the GISB office
at (713) 356-0060.

Best Regards,  GISB Office

(If you are on this Membership and General Notices distribution list and
would like to be removed, please email such request to the GISB office and
your email address will be removed. If you would like to add other
participants from your company to this distribution list, please also email
such request to the GISB office.  GISB follows a privacy policy and will not
provide your email address to other groups for their use.)

 - cr000503.PDF


Joe,

Would you like to renew with a letter agreement as in previous years?

Thanks,

Kay

"Curreri, Joe" <JCurreri@ensr.com> on 10/12/2000 12:51:59 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Stephen Plauche (E-mail)" <stephen.plauche@enron.com>

Subject: Consulting Services Agreement

Hello Kay,

Steve Plauche asked me to send you a copy of the current agreement with ENA
cited in the work order request for the Connecticut project.  You will note
the agreement expires at the end of this month.  Please fax the signed work
order to my attention at 978 266-4098 today as Steve has directed us to
begin work immediately and attend a meeting tomorrow.  Also, it would be a
great help if you could provide a letter extending the term of the agreement
to October 2001.  Please call me if you have any questions.

Joe Curreri
Vice President
Power Generation Services
35 Nagog Park
Acton, MA 01720
phone:   978 635-9500 ext 3161
fax:       978 266-4098
e-mail:  jcurreri@ensr.com

 <<ENA Consulting Services Agreement.pdf>>

**********************************************************************
The information contained in this communication is confidential and
privileged proprietary information intended only for the individual
or entity to whom it is addressed.  Any unauthorized use, distribution,
copying or disclosure of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please contact the
sender immediately.

It is our policy that e-mails are intended for and should be used for
business purposes only.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

ENSR
www.ensr.com
postmaster@ensr.com
**********************************************************************

 - ENA Consulting Services Agreement.pdf


Tana -

The below request for an NDA is from the director of Clickpaper.com.  Can we
process this this morning?

Please disregard all of the Linking Agreement language.

Thanks.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 03/09/2001 08:52 AM -----

	John Cummings/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/08/2001 06:16 PM

		 To: Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Forestweb NDA and Linking Agreement

Mark

Please send the NDA with return instructions to :

Rami Ghandour
Forestweb, Inc.
1801 Avenue of the Stars
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Phone: 310-553-0008
Fax: 310-553-0080
Rami@forestweb.com

Please leave me a message as to when I can get the Linking Agreement to
Paperloop.  If we can get it to them tomorrow, then they might just sign it
after a quick review in order to go live by Sunday.  Also please prepare the
Linking Agreement for ForestWeb as well.

JC


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 07/24/2000 03:16
PM ---------------------------

ANITAREED@aol.com on 07/23/2000 06:25:52 PM
To: Randall.L.Gay@enron.com, pookie@pipeline.com, Walkrboys3@aol.com,
Tereed3@aol.com
cc:
Subject: August Calendar in WordPerfect

This is the calendar, in WordPerfect. . .

 - AUGCAL~1.WPD


Thank you for the invite. I will be attending.


Roger:
We're still ruminating on this within Government Affairs and will continue to
ruminate over the next few days, but wanted to fill you in on where we
currently are and get your comments.  Thanks.

Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 09/29/2000 12:11 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	09/28/2000 01:49 PM

		 To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES,
Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: PG&E Proposed Solution

Harry:

At the meeting yesterday, we concluded that it would be a good idea to take
the proposal that you put together based on your meeting with EES and use it
as the "base case" to start running the numbers.  Idea being that before we
shop anything around, we need to know what the numbers look like to determine
whether the thing's got any legs.

Once we have a clear understanding of how the base case  numbers shake out,
we thought we might then want do some sensitivity analyses around the
variables, come up with a final proposal, and then go back to the commercial
groups for buy-in.  We hoped that your folks could get together with Roger
Yang et al and provide some assessment of what the base case numbers look
like by middle of next week.  How's this plan sound?  Few other points:

We assume that bullet 6's reference to "net" means that the deferral is
calculated by taking any "overcollections" and subtracting them from any
"undercollections" over the entire 3 year period,not year-by-year.
What is the significance of the 3.1 CTC roll-off date?  We're assuming it's
commercially driven.  We correct?  If so, what's the driver?  Same goes for
the 2004 ending date.
Some tweeks were made to the proposal at the meeting to create an "Option 2"
for folks to consider.  (Though we don't think that any numbers need to be
run on "Option 2" until after having completed the analysis on option 1,
since those results could influence any scenarios we decide to construct).
Option 2 would:
Keep the hydro with the utility and apply Edison's proposed ratemaking
treatment.
Beginning 6.1.01, make large customers "noncore," similar to the gas model in
California, and force those customers to choose an ESP.
Beginning 1.1.03, introduce competitive default service for remaining "core"
(i.e., rez and small commercial) customers.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Finally, couple of things that occurred to me after yesterday's meeting that
I want to throw out for folks to react to:

Seems that, to be successful, the proposal needs to remain as stripped down
and simple as possible.
When the proposal nets out the deferral costs, does it include the
over/undercollections associated with utility residual generation?
In option 2, by adding the "noncore" feature, and by implementing that
feature and the default service feature prior to the 04 ending date, the
proposal gets more complicated (and adds significantly more risk to the
utility's position).  This is not to say that the complications can't be
worked out, or that the added risk can't be accounted for, but wanted to
highlight it for folks to consider.

Attached is the original, with just a couple of minor edits, and "Option 2."

Best,
Jeff


Niniejszym potwierdzam, ze nastepujacy studenci zlozyli prace dyplomowe:

Jerzy Seremak  PREZENTACJA  INSTRUMENT?W  ANALIZY FINANSOWEJ  JAKO
PODSTAWA     OCENY  WYBRANEGO PODMIOTU
W  KR?TKIM  I  DLUGIM OKRESIE  CZASU              Ocena: Bardzo dobra

WALDEMAR MR?Z  CONTROLLING W PRZEDSIOBIORSTWIE     Ocena: Bardzo dobra

T. Blach  Analiza wskaznikowa    Ocena: Bardzo dobra

W. Kaminski


Rick, I will be available for conference call.   Please let me know call in number.  Thanks,  Randy

	Rick Johnson/ENRON@enronXgate 07/08/2001 12:42 PM 	   To: Tom Nieswander/ENRON@enronXgate, Randy Pais/Corp/Enron@Enron, Willie M Williams/ENRON@enronxgate  cc: Sharon Butcher/ENRON@enronXgate, Michelle Cash/Enron@EnronXGate, Sandra Lighthill/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: Preliminary Investigation - Recap

Privileged and Confidential - NOT for Circulation

Attached is OLER's preliminary event recap and fact finding on the Sexual harassment / retaliation concerns at the EPIC Coyote Springs 2 Project.
Please review in anticipation of a Tele-Conference call July 9 - PM Houston time.  (Call details will be provided by Sandra Lighthill.  Please advise her of your availability)  It will be necessary to return to the project for additional interviews on Wednesday July 11.  Please note recommendations and conclusions offered in preliminary investigation report.
Regards, Rj.


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/27/2001 04:06 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	04/27/2001 03:42 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>,
"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
		 cc: "William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Tony Wetzel"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Tandy McMannes" <mcmannes@aol.com>, "Sue Mara"
<smara@enron.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Iliff"
<siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Stephanie Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Scott Sadler"
<sadlersa@earthlink.net>, "Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>,
"Richard Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Randy Hickok"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rachel King" <rachel.king@elpaso.com>, "Paula
Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Nam Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>,
"Marty McFadden" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Lynn Lednicky"
<lale@dynegy.com>, "Larrea, John" <John.g.Larrea@williams.com>, "kent
Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Ken Hoffman"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Kate Castillo" <ccastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "John Stout" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe
Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Greco" <jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jim
Willey" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jack Hawks" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>,
"Hap Boyd" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Frazier
Blaylock" <frayblay@aol.com>, "Frank DeRosa"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Eric Eisenman"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "Ed Tomeo"
<ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelson" <dnelsen@msn.com>, "Doug Fernley"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "David
Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton" <Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>,
"Craig Chancellor" <craigc@calpine.com>, "Cody Carter"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob
Gates" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>,
"Bob Ellery" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill
Carlson" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Alex Sugaoka"
<alex.sugaoka@UAECORP.COM>, "Bob Szymanski" <rjszymanski@powerworksinc.com>,
"Chris Ellison" <CTE@eslawfirm.com>, "Doug Kerner" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>, "Andy
Brown" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "Sandi McCubbin" <smccubbi@enron.com>, "Susan
McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Scott Govenar"
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Robert Ross"
<robbiz@cwo.com>, "Rina Venturini" <rventurini@teamgsi.net>, "Phil Isenberg"
<Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Maureen OHaren"
<Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Marie Moretti" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Jamie
Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>, "Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Fred
Pownall" <fred_pownall@ka-pow.com>, "Delany Hunter" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>,
"Chuck Cole" <ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>,
"Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Mark Nobili" <mnobili@cal-lobby.com>
		 Subject: Legislative Status Report Week Ending 4/27

Date: April 27, 2001
To:  Jan Smutny-Jones, Steven Kelly, Katie Kaplan
Cc:  IEP Board Members
From:  Julee Malinowski-Ball
Re:  Legislative Status Report Week Ending 4/27

RECENT EVENTS

-- Rule #1: Never assume an issue is done until the ink is dry from the
Governor's signature (and even then you never know).  The Senate Republicans
agreed late this week to oppose SB 28x (Sher), which makes several
IEP-sponsored proposals to the siting process, due to a controversial
provision added in the Assembly Appropriations Committee regarding
unemployment compensation.  Assembly Republicans let it slide on process
because CMTA and the Chamber's objections to the egregious language was so
last minute.  Senate Republicans had more time to look at the issue and
agreed not to let it go forward.  Since they control of the final vote in a
bill requiring two-thirds, their united opposition stopped the bill, one
vote shy.  The author was granted reconsideration and discussions will be
on-going over the next week on how to proceed.  The best-case scenario at
this point is getting one Republican to drop from the ranks.  Worst-case
scenario is the bill dies, and our language gets picked up in another
vehicle starting the whole process all over again.  The more likely
scenario, however, lies somewhere in between.  Parties will agree to some
compromise language, send the bill back to the Assembly to make the
appropriate changes, then bring it back to the Senate for a clean vote.

-- Long-term contracting was moved to the front burner this week by Asm.
Wright (AB 57) and Senator Morrow (SB 997), both with different results.
Both measures, which are almost identical, set forth a criteria which, if
followed by an IOU when signing a long-term contract with an energy
supplier, would eliminate the need for a reasonableness review by the CPUC.
AB 57 passed out of the Assembly Utilities and Commerce committee with
little discussion and a few technical amendments.  SB 997 faced a longer,
more difficult hearing in front of Senator Bowen's Energy Committee.  IEP,
along with the three IOUs testified in support of the measure, while TURN
expressed great concerns with the concept of leaving the CPUC out of the
picture.  In the end, the Senate committee agreed to put the bill off for
further discussions, passed a motion in support of getting the appropriate
rule waver so the bill can be heard again after Friday's policy committee
deadline, and scheduled a stakeholder meeting for Thursday morning.  Senator
Burton announced on the Senate Floor Thursday morning, however, that all
requests for rule wavers would be denied.  AB 57 appears to be the only
active vehicle on this issue, and IEP will be at the negotiating table
providing input on the language as it moves forward.

-- AB 60x is scheduled for hearing next week in the Senate Energy Committee.
IEP met with committee staff this week, which revealed some possible
latitude in amending the bill.  IEP and other member company lobbyists will
be pushing hard for an opposed position from the rest of the committee
before the hearing Tuesday afternoon.  At this time, however, we do not have
any alternative language for the bill.  After further review by some IEP
member companies, the previously drafted amendments appear unworkable and
were withdrawn from consideration.  We anticipate on waiting to see where
the committee on Tuesday takes the issue before another attempt at drafting
alternative language.

-- SB 1x (Soto/Scott) was amended this week before its hearing in the Senate
Appropriations committee next week.  The new language finds a backdoor to
the price cap issue by imposing a 100 percent tax on the sale of electric
power that exceeds a base price of $80 per MW/hr.  CMTA, the Chamber and
CalTax will be coordinating strategy for the hearing with IEP and the
generators, but despite the bill's multiple constitutional and legal
problems, most admit the measure will move forward with little trouble.  A
new player on the scene will probably provide the most noteworthy testimony.
InterGen North America, which is developing a 900 MW power plant in Palm
Springs, plans on testifying that if this measure is signed by the Governor,
they will absolutely pull the project and go to Oklahoma.

-- Newly amended this week is AB 67x (Cardoza), which now makes it a felony
for a corporation that sells electricity or natural gas at unjust or
unreasonable rates. Sponsored by Lt. Governor Bustamante, the measure
establishes stiff fines and possible jail time, that could be subject to the
state's "three strikes" law.  AB 67x has already generated opposition from
Republicans and constitutional questions from legal experts.   Although
Cardoza noted that several aspects of the bill are unresolved and could
change, the intent will remain the same, and he insists that energy
companies that take advantage of Californians will still face significant
penalties.

-- SB 6x, (Burton), which establishes a State Power Authority, passed the
Assembly this week by a 48 to 28 vote.  The measure needs the Senate to
concur on the Assembly amendments before it heads to the Governor's desk.

-- Attached are the most recent legislative tracking reports for both the
special and regular sessions.  Please call if you need copies of any of the
bills.

UPCOMING EVENTS

MONDAY, April 30th
Senate Appropriations Committee
SB 1x (Soto) - excess profits tax
SB 30x (Brulte) - local government incentives

Assembly Energy Costs and Availability Subcommittee on Natural Gas Costs and
Availability
Informational Hearing

TUESDAY, May 1st
Senate Energy Committee
AB 60x (Hertzberg) - California First

MONDAY, May 7th
Senate Appropriations Committee
SB 64x (Costa) - biomass incentive

ON THE SENATE FLOOR
SB 28x (Sher) - siting proposals
SB 6x (Burton)  - State Power Authority

--end--

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net

 - 2001 Tracking Report.doc
 - 2001 Tracking Report.special session.doc


Good Morning,

Exciting News!!  We now have a new Portland Web based IT incident & tracking
application to replace the existing Westdeskitissues.mde Access application.
The new Web based solution adds several key enhancements that will hopefully
improve IT response time and improve our communications back to you when
problems are resolved.

Here are some of the key enhancments:
1.  Ability to query outstanding & resolved issues.
2.  IT problem/resolution knowledge base.
3.  Web page that displays important IT contact information.
4.  Automatic email notifications to resolution team members.
4.  And much, much, more.

For those of you who may be new to the office, or may have forgotten about
the old Westitissues.mde application.  This application is continuously
monitored by the production support team for infrastructure (PC's, Monitors,
terminal-server, LAN, WAN, etc) and application (Enpower, Portcalc, CAPS,
etc.) problems or enhancements requested by users.  This database is also
summarized to capture metrics which are then used to evaluate the performance
of the IT group.

Here are the steps to using the new West Desk Problem Tracking System:

New Login:

1. Go to http://westdesksupport/
2. Click the Login button towards the bottom of the page.
3. In the UserName Box, Enter:  ITWD.
4. For the Password type in: Password.
5. On the next Screen, fill out all the information. (Only certain fields are
required, but filling out everything is preferable)
6. After Clicking the submit button, you are going to be asked to login with
the new username and password you created in the New User Area.
7. Upon submitting, you will come to the main index page.

Adding a WorkOrder:

1. On the Main index page, click on the link add incident to log under the
heading of West Desk Links.
2. Fill out as much information as possible. For IT Contact, please enter
appropriate contact, or if you are not sure, select mtully.
3. Select Priority. (This may be changed by IT)
4. Submit form.

Note: For the description and response fields, you may use html tags for the
formatting of text for display.

The rest is pretty self explanatory. If you hover your cursor over a link or
picture or text box, a texttip will appear and tell you what that link or
textbox is for.

Thanks,

Mike Tully
Trading Floor Support

P.S. When entering a incident, there are two different types of "NEW
Requests". One is New Request (Problem). This is used for reporting an error
or problem with an application. The other is New Request (Enhancement) which
is used for requesting an enhancement to an application.


Paige wrote me at 430 this am, and said that since she was still up at 430,
she probably won't be home in time for Michael's parties.  Should I just
leave him after gymnastics?  I don't really want to come back the office, but
I do want to go to Anne's.  Hmmm.  If Paige is home by 500, everything might
work.


Ms. Ridinger:

I am an analyst studying industrial gas load in the northwestern United States
and am attempting to place a number of aluminum plants. I believe I have the
Northwest Pipeline DRN numbers for 3 of your 4 plants, but am not sure
which meter feeds your Ferndale, WA plant. Also, I would like to confirm the DRNs
for the other three.
If you, or someone you could refer me to, could provide this information I would
greatly appreciate it.

Thanks,
Jason Wolfe
Trading Analyst
Enron North America
713-853-0568


Your cigars from Teal Lodge are in my drawer, both are in metal cases if you
come by when I'm not here.


Here are the customer's comments to the standard outgoing Bridgeline Holdings
gty for BGML.

Please review and let me know.

thanks
brant


Hi,

	Attached is a draft of the Enron Credit Strategic Plan.  I meant forward this to you last nite when I sent it to VInce.  But in my haste to make it to a party that I was already 3 hours late for I forgot to do so.

	Your comments and feedback are greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mack, Iris
Sent:	Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:12 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Draft of "Enron Credit Strategic Plan" aka the document for Professor Duffie
Importance:	High

Hi,

	Attached is a more recent draft of the "Enron Credit Strategic Plan".  Your comments and feed back are most welcomed.  Please feel free to rip it apart, etc.

	In addition to ensuring that this document is technically correct, I would also like to ensure that it is politically correct - especially since the London guys are so anxious to see it.  I am amazed at the level of interest in this document.

	The passwords for this document are:
		rottenfish1
		rottenfish2.

	Finally, I recall on Friday your stating that you wanted to have a luncheon meeting on Monday.  I was wondering if this meeting could be postponed until Tuesday or later.  I have to go home at lunch to sign for my UPS delivery of my "Click@Home" PC.  I hope this is not a big inconvenience.

Thanks,
Iris


In case you have not seen USA's list of America's finest employers, Compaq
Computer Corporation is ranked #8.  The article is attached.

Regards,

Tom

 <<Best Jobs USA.html>>

 - Best Jobs USA.html


How about sending it out from me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frausto, Ruthann
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Daily, Pamela
Subject:	RE: Draft memo to admins

How's this?

Recently we've had a couple of mix ups regarding vacant office space and phone moves. In light of this, we'd like to help by coordinating the moves in 3AC like we've been doing in the Enron Building. We know you are all very busy, and we'll be happy to submit move requests for you, including telephone moves and reassignments.

This will also enable us to keep current on floor space billing and make sure it gets corrected when an employee moves.

Please contact Ruthann (x66538) for assistance with any moves in 3AC, and Pam (x36135) for assistance with any moves in the Enron Building. Of course, if one of us is unavailable, feel free to call the other. If an office or cubicle is vacant and you would like to put someone in it, please contact us, so we can help coordinate it and hopefully avoid confusion.

Thanks for your help.

Pam Daily and Ruthann Frausto

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:51 AM
To:	Daily, Pamela; Frausto, Ruthann
Subject:	RE: Draft memo to admins

Maybe overkill, I would rather send them an email talking about the problems, and they have to let you 2 know when they going to use a space, and how they can coordinate stuff with you 2 instead of dictating.   I am little touchy right now about how to approach people, so we need to be careful.   I am open to more discussion on this, just would like to soften the tone a litlle.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Daily, Pamela
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 6:18 PM
To:	Frausto, Ruthann
Cc:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	RE: Draft memo to admins

That sounds good. We might also want to include any other request that would potentially use a "space" such as tables for data rooms, contractors, etc. If they think it only applies if they are actually moving a person or phone, the spaces we think we have available may be used without churns. For instance, sometimes I think spaces are available for use, only to find boxes and/or equipment has been set up. Just a thought. What do you think -- overkill?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frausto, Ruthann
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:19 PM
To:	Daily, Pamela
Subject:	Draft memo to admins

What do you think of this to send out to the admins in 3AC?

In an effort to better control our space planning needs, effective immediately all ETS moves will be coordinated by Pam Daily and Ruthann Frausto. This pertains to all moves, including telephone only moves.

Please contact Pam (X36135)  regarding any moves in the Enron Building, and contact Ruthann (x66538) regarding any moves in the 3AC building. Of course, if one of us is unavailable, feel free to contact the other.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Feel free to make any changes you'd like.

RF


Daren,
Did things work out here. Do you still need to talk with me about it.
Ami

---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000
08:04 AM ---------------------------

"Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com> on 06/01/2000 04:15:11 PM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Carthage (American Central) Nomination

Chad called and said you guys are requestiing approximately 74,000 MMBtu
effective June 1.  I show the number should be 72,240 MMBtu/d.  Could you
please check into this and let me know what's going on?

Thanks,
Steve


Your thoughts are dead on.  Russel would be a great guy to cover those guys
for EGM for crude and products.  Please mention to Caroline we are not trying
to crowd her out, just get more depth on funds coverage.  Also, when we talk
about other GRM products, it will help to have more fund coverage.  (We can
also address her issue later--I agree with you on that.)  Proceed, but I'm
not sure about the JV with ENA issue.  Let's not go down that road
"officially".

By the way, rough is spelled roof.

Later.....

Jeff

	Per Sekse
	02/14/2001 10:14 AM

		 To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: My call this morning was re Hedge Fund Coverage for GM

I know you're busy so here are my thoughts.

The hedge fund business has expanded enough to warrant at least two people
covering it. It makes sense that Enron has one person focussed on the natgas
business since it is 90% of what we book right now. We're also about to get
one of the funds trading power.  Caroline Abramo focusses on this and will
continue to do so reporting to Fred. If for some reason that relationship
doesn't work out, we can revisit it with her at that time.

To build up the crude oil and products trading we should have a similar
person devoted to covering the hedge funds. That person should work for GM
and work in partnership with ENA, kind of a JV between our groups, but with
the origination for each product staying with the appropriate business unit,
as you plan to do.  Given that, I would recommend putting Russell Dyk in that
role, have him spend the next 2 months working on the crude desk to kick
start the coverage and then move him to NY. He and Caroline would share the
hedge fund client base and back each other up when busy or travelling. If we
need more support, we can add an associate to work for them jointly in NY.
Overall, we're leveraging our hedge fund relationships to generate more
origination income for Enron.

This model also fits with the reality of hedge fund coverage at Enron, i.e.
you need marketers with specific product knowledge close to the trading desks
dealing direct with the fund traders. Enron Metals has their own people doing
this today. We're simply expanding the concept to GM. Ultimately, when we get
Enron under one rough in NY, the metals, oil and gas specialists woukld be
able to jointly cover the clients, while providing market expertise as needed.

If you agree this makes sense, then I can tell Fred that we plan to put our
own person in NY.

What do you think? I can stop by to discuss further any time today.

Per


----- Forwarded by Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 11:07 AM -----

	Suzanne Adams
	02/16/2001 10:44 AM

		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Turbine Purchase Agreement Between GE and E-Next Generation LLC

I had his name on my original list, but I must have accidentally deleted it
when I was putting in another name.  Sorry.
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 10:43 AM -----

	Suzanne Adams
	02/16/2001 10:42 AM

		 To: Mike Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Turbine Purchase Agreement Between GE and E-Next Generation LLC

----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 10:41 AM -----

	Suzanne Adams
	02/16/2001 10:10 AM

		 To: Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Wente/HOU/ECT@ECT, stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, bill.williams@enron.com
		 cc: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Turbine Purchase Agreement Between GE and E-Next Generation LLC

Attached please find the above-reference document and attachments.


Bill:
Thanks for the information.  I need to take a closer look at Janet's
language, particularly the "null and void" language to make sure that it
covers all possible events of default under the Master Agreement.  As to the
Texas law issue, our ability to get comfortable from a legal standpoint will
in large part be dictated by this issue.  Is there anyway to get more
certainty on this with the sureties?  I understand that you don't want to go
to them multiple times but this is a key issue for us.  Let me know what you
think.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	boldham@reliant.com
	06/04/2001 03:35 PM

		 To: carol.st.clair@enron.com
		 cc: jkgreene@reliant.com
		 Subject: Re: Update

Carol:

The attached two e-mails are in response to your inquiry of 6-1-01.  If you
have any questions, let me know.

Bill Oldham
Director, Insurance Risk Management
Reliant Energy Incorporated
Telephone No.713/207-3131
FAX No. 713/207-3251
email:    bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com
----
----- Forwarded by Bill Oldham/ADM/HouInd on 06/04/01 10:19 AM -----

                    Michael_Herrod@a
                    rs.aon.com              To:     boldham@reliant.com
                                            cc:     Dan_Burton@ars.aon.com,
John_Rathmell@ars.aon.com,
                    06/04/01 09:59          Kevin_Sparks@ars.aon.com,
Margaret_Buboltz@ars.aon.com,
                    AM                      Margaret_Gibson@ars.aon.com
                                            Subject:     Re: Update

In my opinion, the wording suggested by Janet Green should be acceptable.
We
will have to have this wording formally approved by the surety companies
prior
to issuance.  I would like to avoid approaching the sureties until all
questions
have been addressed and all changes have been made.  In regards the bonds
being
subject to Texas law, I do not see that as being a problem.  We will
address
that with the sureties along with other potential changes.

In response to previous email, neither Dan nor I know of an attorney that
would
be willing or able to write an opinion in regards the applicability of the
Appleton Law.  As discussed during the meeting, this law has nothing to do
with
the viability of an exisitng surety bond.  If a surety issued a bond that
was
later found to be in violation of Appleton, they would be fined by the
State of
New York.  It does not make the bond invalid.  MJH

----- Forwarded by Bill Oldham/ADM/HouInd on 06/04/01 07:32 AM -----

                    Janet K Greene
                                         To:     Bill
Oldham/ADM/HouInd@HouInd
                    06/03/01 05:23       cc:
                    PM                   Subject:     Re: Update(Document
link:
Bill Oldham)

What if we said:  "if the
Principal shall promptly and faithfully perform its obligations under the
Confirm, which is a part of and governed by the Master Agreement, then this
obligation shall be null and void"

With respect to her second point, what if we again said "an Event of
Default has occurred under the Confirm, which is a part of and governed by
the Master Agreement"?

I think she is trying to clarify in the language that the bond can be
called for an Event of Default under the Master Agreement, which could have
nothing to do with the Confirm - - - which is factually correct.

Janet K. Greene
Reliant Resources, Inc.
1111 Louisiana, Suite 4300
Houston, TX 77002
713-207-5732
fax: 713-207-0141
jkgreene@reliant.com

                    Bill Oldham
                                         To:     Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
                    06/01/01 09:27       cc:     Edward.Sacks@enron.com,
janet-greene@reliantenergy.com,
                    AM                   Wendy.Conwell@enron.com, Bill T
Hamilton/TTG/HouInd@HouInd, William
                                         Waller/ADM/HouInd@HouInd, Rex
Clevenger/ADM/HouInd@HouInd
                                         Subject:     Re: Update(Document
link:
Janet K Greene)

Carol:

Thankyou for the attached.  I believe the governing law for each issuing
surety will be the law where the surety is domiciled, but let me do some
checking and confirm this.  Also, will get back to you on your comments Re
the language in our recommended bond form...probably Monday or Tuesday next
week.  Thanks for your continued efforts in this matter.

Bill Oldham
Director, Insurance Risk Management
Reliant Energy Incorporated
Telephone No.713/207-3131
FAX No. 713/207-3251
email:    bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com

                    Carol.St.Clair
                    @enron.com            To:
bill-oldham@reliantenergy.com
                                          cc:
janet-greene@reliantenergy.com, Edward.Sacks@enron.com,
                    06/01/01 09:02        Wendy.Conwell@enron.com
                    AM                    Subject:     Update

Bill:
I spoke with our outside counsel yesterday and we have some more follow up
work that we need to do on our side.  One issue that may be of some
importance to us in our analysis is determining what the governing law of
the surety bond will be for each issuer, and more importantly, whether we
can have the bonds governed by Texas law.  Can you answer this for me?

Also, with respect to the form of the bond itself, as we mentioned at the
meeting, the language in the third paragraph which states that "if the
Principal shall promptly and faithfully provide the Firm energy as defined
in the Confirm, hen this obligation shall be null and void," does not work
for us.  Has anyone come up with alternative language?  Finally, with
respect to the Notice of Claim, we would like for the certification to say
something like, "an Event of Default has occurred under the Master
Agreement" rather than tie it to a specific default under the Confirmation.
Does that work for the sureties?

I look forward to hearing from you.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	infopost@duke-energy.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-infopost+40duke-energy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 7:32 AM
To:	infopost@duke-energy.com
Subject:	TE South Pass Lateral at capacity

June 1, 2001
The South Pass Lateral upstream of VENICE (VEN) in ELA has been
scheduled to capacity. No increases will be accepted for gas day June 1,
2001 for meters on this lateral.
Meters on this lateral are:
METER                                    METER
NUMBER  METER NAME                       OPERATOR
------  -------------------------------- ------------
72137   MARATHON - WD 86, LA             MARATHON OIL
72138   MARATHON - SP 89-B, LA           MARATHON OIL
72319   EXXON - SP 93, LA                EXXON CO
72555   D&G ENERGY CORP. - WD 25, LA     D&G ENER COR
72831   MARATHON, BLK 86 - S. PASS, LA   MARATHON OIL
72849   SAMEDAN OIL CORPORATION - 365 MC SAMEDAN OIL
72972   WALTER OIL & GAS - WD 106, LA    SUPERIOR NAT
73027   MARATHON - SP87, LA              MARATHON OIL
73073   SHELL OFFSHORE , WD 143, - LAO   SHELL OFF

Please contact your Operations Account Manager if you have any
questions.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.


FYI. sj

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Spraggins, Gary
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	DL-ETS Gas Controllers; LeBeau, Randy; Beaver-Plant, Team; Sturn, John
Cc:	Neubauer, Dave; Rice, Randy; Pribble, Dan; Stage, Michael G.; Herber, Stephen
Subject:	Continental  C- Line receipt

I received a call today from the CMS Beaver plant and they have shut their process plant down due to gas prices. They do not know at this time  when they will start back processing . This is the same thing that happen last December. They have assured us that the gas that they are delivering to us is going through a Dehy and a mole sieve to knock any water out. The BTU of the gas received on the C-line will be running around 1150 BTU. We will need to keep a close watch on the C-line suction water content during this time. This is the first call I have received about a processing plant shutting down due to price this month.

Gary Spraggins.


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 6/4/01.   Please note that Continental Gas, Inc., Continental Resources Inc., Hiland Partners, LLC, North Texas Gas Partners and Florida Gas Utility were added to the Credit Watch List.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923, Russell Diamond at x5-7095, or Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.


Dear all,

here is the latest version  of European Product Descriptions - worksheet
"Long Descriptions".

Elena


Send it to Ina Rangel she can forward it to appropriate traders.  There are
too many to list individually


Please review the attached outage report. Also, please send me any outages you have planned for 2002.

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 09:33 AM -----

	Taffy Milligan
	10/30/2000 08:28 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Susan Bailey - Will NOT be in today.

Sugarbear is experiencing some post-surgery complications.


Have we captured these dollars in our P&L?   Let's make sure we are getting
credit, if appropriate.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 10:36 AM
---------------------------

Robert Superty
08/03/2000 04:02 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Update

FYI - ongoing CES reconciliation. At this point we will be receiving app.
$5.4M (invoice sent on 7/27) with another $7.5M to be billed to them next
week.

Still more to come, for details read the attached from Molly.

Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000
03:52 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Molly Sumrow                           08/03/2000 03:47 PM

To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly
Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CES Update

Attached is the current status of the CES reconciliation.  Please call me if
you have any questions.

Thank You,

Molly


Tana

I do not seem to have received the documentation referred to in my e-mail
below.  I should be grateful if you would e-mail the execution versions both
to me and Michael Khajeh-Noori so that we can mirror the documentation for
the purposes of negotiating a new ISDA with Kellogg's UK entity.
Alternatively, if it is not possible to e-mail them, please fax them to me (+
44 20 7783 8171).

If you  have any questions, please let me know.

In the meantime, many thanks for your help.

Regards

Deepak
---------------------- Forwarded by Deepak Sitlani/LON/ECT on 09/05/2000
12:42 ---------------------------

Deepak Sitlani
03/05/2000 14:44
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Michael Khajeh-Noori/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Kellogg's

I am looking for the ISDA Schedule, Paragraph 11 to the Credit Support Annex
and the Enron and Kellog guarantees.  If at all possible, it would be ideal
if you could e-mail me the execution versions of these docs.  Alternatively,
please fax them (my fax no. is +44 20 7783 4539).

Many thanks for your help.

Regards

Deepak

From: Tana Jones on 03/05/2000 08:41 CDT
To: Deepak Sitlani/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Kellogg's

The Kellogg ISDA Agreement has been signed, but it is somewhat long.  Would
you like me to fax it to you (if so, what is your fax no.?) or would you like
me to fedex it to you?


Please be sure and check the website.  People are still looking at it to fullfill internal/external inquiries.

Joey - I need you to continue to calc the NG-PR-OPT book, even though it's flat.  There are positions in it, so we need to calc and officialize it (my bad).

Thanks,

EM


A very good time was had by all.  I for one lost some shorts and a voice, but
it was well worth it.
Thanks Miguel and everyone else.
Ben


Daren,   Cody has a new well coming on Friday behind the 985333.  Right now
we don't have any nominations at that meter so I'll get with vance on that .
The increases according to the fax is going from 230@day to 1700 on friday
and 1700 to 3200 on sat.  PRIZE Energy would like to make some changes,

Meter

4028       from 1270 to 820          has been flowing from 600 to 800 this
month

4965       from 112 to 45                has been flowing mid 80's this month
                 from 97 to 104


Here are the days I have discrepancies with PG&E.  Please let me know which
numbers are good.  Thanks

Thu
3-7159

 Day PG&E HPL
 12-05 145833 120000
 12-10 60000 35000
 12-11 70000 80000
 12-17 3125 3100
 12-21 50000 70000
 12-22 0 20000
 12-25 0 30000
 12-26 0 30000
 12-27 31375 63000