>From: "Linda Stout" <meaness5@hotmail.com>
>To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com
>CC: meaness5@hotmail.com
>Subject: complaint against gleason power plant.
>Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 21:05:39 CDT
>
>                                                 SEPT.20,2000
>>Dear Sir,
>
>
>>My Name is Linda Stout and i live at 1735 Janes Mill RD,
>>when people ask what the people where doing drilling down the road from us
>>they were told that it was a well for water or some sort not a power plant
>>that would keep you up at night or morning.
>>I have a good reason for complainting as well as everyone eles down or up
>>the road from us because the noise is so annoying and no one wants to come
>>to your house to visit neverless to say we have jobs just like everyone
>>does and like myself works nights or day and our childern need there rest
>>but no one seems to care about that and the noise cont.
>>THE NEWSPAPER said something about it could blow up if the man caring for
>>it didnt do his job well dont that make me feel better knowing that my
>>family isnt safe in their own home.
>>It's 8:20pm right now and it sound like there is a bad storm outside
>or a disturbance that the law would be summons to and if this was a party
>making that much noise there would be people in jail for it but good grief
>that noise that the power plant makes would wake the dead and that is the
>truth and yes i would like to get away from this but we dont like much
>paying for our home but no one would dare buy it.
>>Some guy name PETE came to our home awhile back and said he didnt even
>>have to enter our home to see if it was loud he stood at the driveway and
>saw that our windows were shaking, you wake up to dishes rattling wondering
>whose is in the kitchen and it wont be anyone.
>>I am not one to complain i try to keep peace among my neighbors because
>>they have right to but it's to the point were none of our friends or
>>family wants to come over to visit or talk or watch t.v because we have to
>>yell what we are trying to say to each other or turn the t.v up so loud to
>>drowing out the noise.
>>Ihope we can come to some sort of understanding about this even if it
>>means trading homes with you or who ever done this and atleast find time
>in your busy work days to hold a meeting with the resident of JANES MILL
>RD. to help solve this problem and concern we have because i feel we are
>atleast intitled to that.
>I have lived here for 3 peaceful years and every one said how beautiful and
>peaceful it was and now they are glad they dont live here and that is sad
>because i was proud of my home.
>>WE feel like everyone at this power plant is avoiding us and our
>>complaints but the problem is never going to be solved if we dont atleast
>>meet and try to hear one another side to this i am sure it was built
>>because we would need it and yes that was a good thing but what about the
>>ones whom has to live here and suffer through it because we have no where
>>eles to go and cant sell our homes we worked hard to buy
>>because no one wants them.
>
>                           thank you,
>                                   LINDA STOUT AND THE REST
>                                   OF THE JANES MILL RD RESIDENTS.
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Julie Gomez, that's who it was!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/05/2000 09:05 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Drew Fossum @ ENRON                           01/05/2000 08:30 AM

To: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: ENA Transportation Risk Management Practices Presentation by
Julie Gomez

Great!  i'll see you there.  DF

TONY PRYOR
01/04/2000 06:17 PM
Sent by: Janet Cones
To: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ENA Transportation Risk Management Practices Presentation by Julie
Gomez

Julie Gomez will present ENA's Transportation Risk Management Practices on
Thursday, January 6th at 10:00 a.m. until no later than 11:30 a.m. in 47C2.


Becky,

Guess this is another example of e:mail cross-fire.  This arrived at the same
time I hung up the phone from talking to you.  I imagine you've spoken to
Gerald by now.

Gerald,

I'm sure that I have failed to let you know that there is a conference call
scheduled for 4:00 today (Becky, its 4:00 Central time isn't it?).  Could you
sit in on that call with Becky?  I plan to be available, but as I will be out
next Monday, and since you have done all the legal work on these responses, I
think it would be a good idea for you to be involved if you can.

Thanks,

Steve
----- Forwarded by Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2000 11:21 AM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	05/18/2000 11:19 AM

		 To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Data responses

Here are the revised responses with your suggested changes.


HODGE, JOHN W,

You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed by Friday, May 25, 2001.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

Employee Name:
COLLINS, JOANN
FOWLER, KULVINDER
GARCIA, CLARISSA
GARZA, MARIA
GILLESPIE, STEVEN
THOMPSON, ALVIN


I don't know if this was the final one...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/01/2001 01:03
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/10/2001 05:10:41 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'ben.f.jacoby@enron.com'" <ben.f.jacoby@enron.com>,
"'f_mitro@hotmail.com'" <f_mitro@hotmail.com>, "'fred.mitro@enron.com'"
<fred.mitro@enron.com>, "'kathleen.carnahan@enron.com'"
<kathleen.carnahan@enron.com>, "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Closing Checklist

 <<2RR404!.DOC>>

Kay:

An updated closing checklist for the ENA / SEL transaction is attached.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

Enclosure: 129280v4

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2RR404!.DOC


Good Morning Sara,

I wanted to touch base with you regarding the CSFB 2001 Equity Swap Basket documentation. Since the last time we spoke here are some of the issues discussed along with some additional recommendations.

1) Finalizing the Master ISDA Agreement with Credit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Limited. I see that the status is under Credit Review.

2) Definitions:
	a) Interest Payment Date- should state "3 business days after the Valuation Date"
	b) Reference Price- amend the phrase "..last regular way trade..." to state "...Official Closing Price..." in (i) and (ii)(b)(iii).
	c) Securities- Omit the reference to "Bonds". The definition should only read: "are the securities specified as such in the Confirmation".
	d) Valuation Date (s)- October 15, 2001, November 15, 2001, ... October 15, 2002

3) Section 5.1 (i)- Omit the reference to Bonds. This section (i) should read: "If a Security pays a dividend or makes another distribution, the payment to be made by the Seller shall be equal to the gross amount of the cash dividend or distribution per share (excluding for the avoidance of doubt any tax credits), as the case may be, multiplied by the Dividend Percentage, multiplied by the Contract Quantity".

We should include a definition for "Dividend Payment Date" to read, "The Equity Payment Date relating to the Valuation Date (s) on which the relevant Dividend Period ends". We should also include a definition for "Dividend Amount". The "Dividend Amount" definition should read, "100% of all ordinary cash dividends where; (i) the ex-dividend date occurs during the period from the day following the Trade Date to and including the final Valuation Date and (ii) the date on which the related ordinary cash dividend would have been received by persons who held the Shares comprising the Basket during such period is during the relevent Dividend Period".

I believe we should address Section 5.2 "Potential Adjustment Event". We should recommend replacing the language similar to the Intra-Period Adjustment language we utilitized in the Enron Credit Confirmation. Their section allows CSFB to "determine" the provisions of the Intra-Period Adjustments. CSFB should not have control over determining any additonal payment or adjustment of the Opening Price or Contract Quantity. The Intra-Period adjustment language is comprehensive in covering all provisions therein.

4) Schedule to Basket Swaps:
	a) Applicable Interest Rate Cycle: should read "1 month"
	b) Termination Date: should read "1 year"
	c) Business Day Convention: should be the standard ISDA "Modified Following Business Day Convention" language.

5) We should also include the Annex structure to be able to monitor the positions held, along with any subsequent adjustments, in the Equity Swap Basket at any time throughout the deal.

Please advise if you like to meet to discuss the documentation in further detail.

Regards,

Jorge A. Garcia
Manager- Risk Managment
Enron Global Markets LLC
713/853-5596


I'm going to write a $50 check to charity (juvenille diabetes) if that's ok
with you.

Kay


Attached is the referenced list.  I am saying "amended-no change" because for
Calpine, I originally had them open for power & financial, and I am not
changing that approval, and for Nicor, I originally had them open for
financial and shut down for power and I am not changing that approval.


If I understand you correctly, it may depend to an extent on season basis
differentials as well.
Why don't you give me a call so I could better understand what you're trying
to do.

Kevin
x3-6320


Susan Scott,

You have been created as a CommodityLogic End User.
Please find your new User/Login ID below.
Please note that your User/Login ID and Password are case sensitive
and must be used in the format entered during
registration.

CommodityLogic URL:           http://www.commoditylogic.com
Your User/Login ID:		CL150149
Password: 				password1

Upon logging into CommodityLogic, you will be asked to load the java plug-in.
This process will only take a minute or two. If you feel it is taking an unusual
amount of time to load, please call us. Also, there is a registry file on the pipeline
login page highlighted in blue. Please double click on it and open it, answer yes
to both questions and you are all set. The last thing you need to do is go into
your control panel from your start menu and double click on your Java Plug In.
Make sure the box that reads Cache Jars in Memory is NOT checked.  This will allow
you to receive all new releases of NomLogic.

If you have any further questions or suggestions, please
feel free to contact me.  If you require technical assistance,
please feel free to contact CommodityLogic by phone at
(888) 334-4204 or by email at customerservice@commoditylogic.com.

Sincerely,

Molly Sumrow
X 34249


At this point, the following applies:

1) European Customer Profile Due Diligence on existing EnronOnline customers
(for determining whether or not the customers may ultimately be granted
Execute status or not) has been completed or the UK and Finland, but is
outstanding for Germany, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland.

2) North American Customer Profile Due Diligence on existing EnronOnline
customers is complete. Canadian customers cannot have any access and there
are no insurmountable reasons why a U.S. customer might not have Execute
Access.

3) There are 5 approved Reference Entities - Expected to be 25 by tonight or
tomorrow.

4) There are 50 Company Profiles with Execute Status.

5) Everything is in place technically to have the Reference Entities and
Customer Profiles running for Wednesday morning.

If anyone is under an understanding different to the above, please call me.

Thanks,

Dave


Name    Home    Pager

George Grant   281-282-9084   713-764-5128
Charlotte Hawkins  281-655-0952   713-506-4006
Aimee Lannou   713-594-6562   713-698-7722
Robert Lloyd   281-847-2808   713-698-5446
Stella Morris   281-448-9067   713-200-8376
Susan Trevino   713-688-6186   713-200-8368
Kim Vaughn   281-586-0910   713-761-8153
Jackie Young   713-528-4562   713-990-6400
Carlos Rodriguez  281-344-0991   713-761-2722
Mandy Allen   281-970-6561   713-990-8332


TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY/
THE LOWRY MAYS COLLEGE AND GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS/

EXECUTIVE MBA PROGRAM

The Lowry Mays College and Graduate School of Business in conjunction with
Texas A&M University are offering their Executive MBA Program at The
University Center in The Woodlands.  This innovative program provides the
path for working professionals to obtain the MBA degree from Texas A&M
University while maintaining full-time employment.

The Mays Executive MBA Program is an 18-month program with classes meeting
from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Friday and Saturday of alternate weekends.
There are no class meetings during the summer months.  The program is
designed for professionals with significant work and managerial experience.
Full time faculty from the Mays Graduate School of Business, with outstanding
academic and industry experience, travel to The University Center to deliver
the program.

The Mays Executive MBA Program is based on an innovative and exciting
curriculum.  The content of the MBA degree is delivered through a series of
integrated modules that have as a central theme &The Value Creation
Process.8  The modules focus on current business issues from various
functional perspectives and stress the development of competencies needed by
successful managers now and into the future.

The Mays Executive MBA Program provides organizations and employees an
immediate return on their investments while preparing for issues of the
future.  The learning environment stresses the understanding of the basic
principles that underlie the complexities of today's business environment.
Teamwork and discussions with the other participants in the program provide
insights and new ideas that can be taken back to the work place.
Organizations benefit as the participants bring new perspectives to their
daily responsibilities.

A new class begins each August.  Applications are now being accepted for the
August 2000 class.

For more information, please contact:

  The Mays Executive MBA Program
  Phone:  888-551-9998
  Email:  emba@tamu.edu

For additional information about Enron,s Policy on Educational Assistance:

  Web:  http://hrweb.enron.com/
  Click on &Policies and Guides8 and then &Education Assistance8

For additional information about Enron Corp's Organizational Development and
Training offerings, contact:

  Suzanne Gruber, Senior Director
  713-345-8314
  Email:  suzanne.gruber@enron.com
  Web:  http://home.enron.com:84/training


Dan:

Could you handle?

Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 08:37 AM -----

	Nelson Ferries@ENRON
	12/14/2000 01:09 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: GISB and MMS Special Provisions

Jeff:

The MMS sent the attachments over for us to review.  They indicated that
there is no contract executed between the MMS and ENA.  Please review the
attached GISB and provide me with any comments .  Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron on 12/14/2000
01:07 PM ---------------------------

"Cobb, Lawrence" <Lawrence.Cobb@mms.gov> on 12/14/2000 01:09:11 PM
To: "'Nelson at Enron'" <nelson.ferries@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: GISB and MMS Special Provisions

Thanks for attending to this, Nelson.  Call me if you have any questions,

Larry Cobb
Manager, RIK Mid Office

 <<GISBUpdate.doc>>  <<MMSGISBSpecialProv.doc>>

 - GISBUpdate.doc
 - MMSGISBSpecialProv.doc


----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 07/13/2001 05:36 PM -----

Donna Fulton
07/13/2001 02:47 PM

To:	Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, sscott3@enron.com, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin M Presto/Enron@EnronXGate, Rogers Herndon/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike Carson/Enron@EnronXGate, John M Forney/Enron@EnronXGate, Laura Podurgiel/Enron@EnronXGate, Gretchen Lotz/Enron@EnronXGate, Juan Hernandez/Enron@EnronXGate, Miguel L Garcia/Enron@EnronXGate, Rudy Acevedo/Enron@EnronXGate, Heather Kroll/Enron@EnronXGate, David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Johnston/Enron@EnronXGate, Bill Rust/Enron@EnronXGate, Edward D Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Terri Clynes/Enron@EnronXGate, Oscar Dalton/Enron@EnronXGate, Doug Sewell/Enron@EnronXGate, Larry Valderrama/Enron@EnronXGate, Nick Politis/Enron@EnronXGate, Fletcher J Sturm/Enron@EnronXGate, Chris Dorland/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff King/Enron@EnronXGate, John Kinser/Enron@EnronXGate, Matt Lorenz/Enron@EnronXGate, Patrick Hansen/SA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/Enron@EnronXGate, dduaran@enron.com, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Louise Kitchen/Enron@EnronXGate, Greg Whalley/Enron@EnronXGate

cc:

Subject:	RTO Orders - Grid South, SE Trans, SPP and Entergy

The Southeast RTO orders are out and have followed through with what we expected from the discussion at the FERC meeting.

The SPP and Entergy RTO proposals have been rejected because they fail to satisfy the scope and configuration requirements of Order No. 2000.  The Commission  notes that the required discussions between SPP and Entergy and its neighboring RTO/TOs has led to no increase in the original scope and configuration.  The filings by SPP and Entergy were brief, indicating only a lack of interest by other RTOs or utilities in joining to enlarge scope; they failed to specify any details of the talks, what changes could be made or what could be fixed to accomodate combination with other RTOs.  The order states that the Commission favors the development of large, regional transmission organizations reflecting natural markets.  The Commission indicates that they favor four RTOs - NE, SE, MW and West.  Therefore the order requires the participants in SPP and Entergy to participate in settlement discussions as set out in the mediation order.  Note that these meetings will start next Tuesday, July 17 before a FERC ALJ.

The Southern Company RTO is also found by the FERC to fail the scope characteristics of Order No. 2000.  The order finds that Southern's approach to focus on MOUs and seams issues with its neighbors is inadequate.  The order states, "We reiterate: the Commission's goal is to have a single RTO in the Southeast, and to have that single RTO operational as soon as possible."  The Commission recognizes that start-up costs in forming a larger RTO may be more, but that over the longer term, large RTOs will foster market development, will provide increased reliability and will result in lower wholesale electricity prices.  The order therefore directs the parties to the mediation as stated above.

The Grid South participants are also directed to the mediation which is starting on next Tuesday.  It is a lengthier order with more details on other aspects of RTOs, including Independent Board requirement, congestion managment, interconnection procedures, planning process and CBM.  Therefore, I am attaching a summary of the order.  One of the important findings of the order is that GridSouth is not sufficiently independent; the Applicant TOs are making policy decisions that should be made by an independent board.  Therefore, the order requires GridSouth to install an independent board and file a compliance filing within 90 days.

If anyone wants copies of the orders, let me know.


I really can't argue w/ ANY of them!
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:03 AM
To: chad knipe; Chet Fenner; EriK Wollam; Joe Parks
Subject: RE: Privacy Please

C'mon guys...comments about which # you like the best!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: chad knipe [mailto:knipe3@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:10 AM
To: Chet Fenner; Brian Constantine; EriK Wollam; Joe Parks
Subject: Re: Privacy Please

If thats the case, screw this expensive friggin' deer lease and lets devote all funds to the well stocked RV unit.  We'll just drive around 'til Sunday.

C.

----- Original Message -----
From: Fenner, Chet
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:05 AM
To: 'Brian Constantine'; EriK Wollam; Fenner, Chet; chad knipe; Joe Parks
Subject: RE: Privacy Please

These are key employees and a good mission statement for the Deer Lease
Winnebago business plan Erik and I were developing.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:48 AM
To: EriK Wollam; Chet Fenner; chad knipe; Joe Parks
Subject: FW: Privacy Please

Men...this is a classic. My favorite is #20...
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Bruder
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:43 AM
To: Brian Constantine; Jeff Stover; Jim Doxakis; Ken Pierce; Matt
Hanifen; Daniel Hill; Terry Turney
Subject: FW: Privacy Please

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelli Servello [mailto:k.servello@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:04 PM
To: John Servello; john servello; Ohsonnyboy@aol.com; Kollen Nelson; BJ;
msteed@pdq.net; Dwayne Miculka; Dave Kirk; Michelle Kerbow; Larry R
Kerbow; Rob Fuchs; Ed Fuchs; Frogman; Bart Frames; Earle Dardar;
cory@multisignals.com; Chris Bruder; BigJoe@JoeBeitler.com
Subject: Fw: The Perfect Woman!!!!!!!!


Darron,

For audit purposes, can you give us a brief description of where the value
for annuities in TAGG as V42434.9 and V42434.A.  We'll add some comments to
TAGG to cover ourselves or send out Termination Agreements if necessary.

Thanks,
Joe Hunter


The attached schedule covers both Friday and Saturday, June 14-15.  Associated text files have been posted to Sparky.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager, Load Forecasting
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


i think that i can get you something.  how quickly do you need it?

best,
jeff

	Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/26/2001 12:28 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Transwestern Hearing

Do you have any materials that describe SoCal's current windowing procedure?


Becky,

I gave the %% for EGM to Shirley. I assume she communicated this info to you
already.
I assume EGM includes F/X - I/R (Gary Hickerson), weather, insurance (Jere
Overdyke),
oil trading and coal.

For CALME I don't have any info. Let's split the cost evenly.

Vince

Becky Pham
11/02/2000 02:11 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Research allocation

Shirley,

GRM is now with EGM group.  EGM wants to verify that the 17.5% we are going
to allocate to GRM is for the Insurance, Jere Overdyke group.  EGM seems to
think that their Weather, Mark Tawney group, is receiving support from
Research.  Also, can we break out the support for CALME?  CALME is going to
split into 3 BUs and I am trying to determine who I need to bill for Research
supports.  If you have any questions, call me.  Thanx.


I recommend using UTSI.  They know a lot about EFM and SCADA systems and have been used by Enron in the past to review/evaluate the Y2K Plan and various gas control functions.

Charlie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:31 AM
To:	Thompson, Charlie
Cc:	Hawkins, Don
Subject:	RE: Need for Rutherford Consulting Complete

Do you have a candidate?    I would argue that we are looking at a process review, so anyone who can do a process review could do this.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Charlie
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:01 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Hawkins, Don
Subject:	FW: Need for Rutherford Consulting Complete

Rod,

I agree with Kenneth Cessac's response.  We should evaluate our current process for collecting, validating and distributing measurement data and consider new ideas and alternatives to improve the process.  Assistance from a consulting firm that specializes in this area would probably be better than using Rutherford.

Charlie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cessac, Kenneth
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Thompson, Charlie
Subject:	RE: Need for Rutherford Consulting Complete

This question has been raised several times over the past 10+ years, should we combine GMS, Field Operations, and some of the Gas Control functions to create a single source for measurement data.  I do not feel that changing a reporting relationship would correct any problems.

I feel the time and effort can e better spent improving our current data collect process and data flow between SCADA and PGAS.  While this process is working I feel that it requires to much manual intervention and handling.  The IT department, Measurement Technology, Gas Control Hot Seat, and the Data Analysis are all involved in keeping the data flowing between SCADA and PGAS.  We should step back and re look and the current process and see what improvements can be made to better control and maintain this process.

 A second area that should be looked at is the data validation process.  Currently Field Operations, Data Analysis, and GMS all  manually review measurement data.  With all of the computer and software technology available I feel that we could easily automate most of the current manual data validation.

I have limited experience with the Rutherford company and what they could provide towards improving these items.  I feel that a company that specializes in SCADA and such as UTSI would be a better option.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hawkins, Don
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 5:27 AM
To:	Thompson, Charlie; Cessac, Kenneth
Cc:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	RE: Need for Rutherford Consulting Complete

Charlie, Ken, I would like to meet with you this afternoon if possible (2:00 pm) so you can bring me up to speed on PGAS and Sullivan's concern so we can respond to Rod by early next week.

Thanks,

Don

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Craig, Rick
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:28 PM
To:	Hawkins, Don; Thompson, Charlie; Cessac, Kenneth
Cc:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	FW: Need for Rutherford Consullting Complete

I'm going to defer this to the experts.  Please convey your thoughts to Rod.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Craig, Rick
Subject:	FW: Need for Rutherford Consullting Complete

Would you agree that something needs to be done?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sullivan, Michael
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:22 PM
To:	Barnes, Caroline; Hayslett, Rod; Saunders, James; Hotte, Steve
Cc:	Stern, Ellis; Lewis, Greg
Subject:	RE: Need for Rutherford Consullting Complete

The PGAS reporting project recently completed requirements gathering meetings with data users in gas measurement technology, gas control, gms, gas accounting, and gas logistics.  We think, those discussions have pointed to a need to assess inefficiencies that appear to exist related to data integrity as data moves between systems and users that span the entire gas volume/quality collection, transformation and delivery process.  In other words there seem to be too many questions and reconcilliations that people have to address along the process as data changes hands and is used for different internal and external purposes.  There also appears to be a lack of a single point of responsibility in the organization for gas volume data from start to finish.
The PGAS reporting project proposed to assess this at a high level and make some recommendations.  But as important as the issue appears to be, you might want to consider using Rutherford to help ETS do a more thorough job of this.
This effort would extend outside FA&A.
Please advise.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barnes, Caroline
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:29 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Stern, Ellis; Sullivan, Michael
Subject:	Need for Rutherford Consullting Complete

Mike, Ellis and I are in agreement that the need for the Rutherford Consulting group is complete.  Rutherford achieved what their goal was; to provide structure and format for the PGAS issues to be addressed in an efficient manner.  The procedures for listing new issues are in place and are being followed by the team.  The meetings are efficient in that only status updates and priorities are reviewed and discussed. There is now only one list for all issues that are being addressed or need to be addressed and they are prioritized.   The monthly meetings are now only needed twice a month.  What is the procedure for notifying Rutherford that their services are no longer needed on this project as they have completed what was asked of them?   cvb


High-level meetings took place between officials of the Clinto
Administration, Governor Davis and other parties on Tuesday night (Ken Lay
and Rick Shapiro attended for Enron). The parties agreed to continue the CA
talks at Treasury and to suspend the FERC process.  The FERC chief judge and
FERC staff attended the meetings at Treasury on Wednesday.  The Tuesday
meeting is called the meeting of "principals."

Apparent   Process
Tuesday meeting gave two assignments to us.
 (1)  Develop framework for auction for long-term contracts and resolving QF
issues
 (2)  Develop framework for dealing with utility debt, including supplier
"forbearance"

Long-term contracts--Attended by Sue Mara
 -- After much debate, divided into three subgroups:
  (a) Timeline/Implementation
  (b) Utility Needs/Product definition/RFP development
  (c) Standard Contract Development
 -- Timeline -- I was the lead and we completed our assignment.  We agreed on
an aggressive schedule   with power flowing by 2/1/01.  The process is set up
for DWR, working with a consultant.  It's an   RFP rather than an auction
process. The idea of a  mock auction was rejected.
 --  Product definition -- Much work needed here.  Major issue set forth
below.
 -- Contract -- Most parties (including Enron) want to use the EEI standard
contract.  Group working on   additional provisions.  Plan final contract by
Friday.
Utility Debt -- Attended by Sarah Novosel
 -- Report later

Major Issues from Long-Term Contracts

NEW MAJOR ISSUE:  Utilities revealed late on Wednesday that they want the
State to assume the role of their portfolio manager and claimed that this had
been their idea all along.  In their view, the utilities provide a forecast
and the State takes on the entire risk of meeting the unmet load of the
utilities.  They were unwilling to commit to any time frame.
Kind of Auction or RFP -- a.k.a What does the Governor really want?  Many
people in the room believe that the Governor was firm in his demand for 5.5
cent power for ALL the unmet load of the utilities.  We spent four hours
debating these issues.  In the end, the parties felt that the best approach
would be to have simulataneous auctions as follows:
 -- Separate bids for NP 15 and SP 15
 -- RFP 1 -- Suppliers submit bids for more than one product with a blended
price of 5.5 cents.
 -- RFP 2 -- (Considered closest to the Gov's proposal) State sets price of
5.5 cents and suppliers compete    on term and volume.
 --RFP3 -- Suppliers provide bids for any of the utilities' product needs and
are free to bid any price,    volume or term.
 -- All RFPs would be conducted simultaneously.  Parties agree that RFP3 is
most likely to get the
   greatest number of bids.

Next Steps
Meetings continue on Thursday
Plan is to have final documents ready for the next meeting of the principals
Principals tentatively set to meet on Friday or Saturday.


oh - laughing


Hi Carolyn,

In addition to my comments regarding the definitions, here are some other
thoughts:

Letter agreement:

I would bracket [Spawn], since we don't have it formed yet and we probably
haven't checked on availability.

2. Closing date should be at least five but no more than 10 business days.  2
(a)  Facility Agreement is probably the more appropriate concept than Turbine
Contract.  Not a big issue if anyone disagrees with this terminology.

3. Make the guaranty for this agreement and the LLC agreement.

5 (d)  change 1st "shall" to "'may".

7 (b) does this make sense?  Should we also have the right to specific
performance?

9.  (iii) consents won't necessarily be obtained at the time of the signing
of the letter agreement.  Should say by closing such will have been
obtained.  I haven't done a reg evaluation, so I would delete the reg rep
unless you are comfortable.  I want the HSR risk to be with them, so I don't
want to contradict it with the rep.

I'll review the LLC agreement next.

Kay


Cara,

PreSchedule:
1.  Concerning the path with transmission data...  The original format was based off of Corry's suggestion.  Perhaps the two of you need to discuss your needs.  However, I should tell you that your approach will require a database access for each transmission, otherwise there is no way for us to determine the POR, POD and firmness for the transmission deal.

2.  Can you give Asem and me some deal numbers to look into regarding the Northwest Delivered deals with multiple delivery points?

3.  We will resolve the physical / non-physical in the next release, as well as add a "Check for Errors" button.

4.  Determining the cause of the speed issues with creating the confirm records can be time consuming.  We will work on it right away, but in the meantime try working with smaller sets of data.  We will get you a faster solution as soon as possible.

Path Confirm:
1.  Sorting...  Are Global ID and Tag sorting, just not in an order that you expect?  Our tools are sorting strictly by alphanumeric comparisons.  If you need the values sorted by numbers, putting the numbers ahead of the description will work better for you.

2.  Can you give me a specific example of a path that is missing dashes?

3.  I will have Vish change the New Path functionality to require both Supply and Market.  If the delivery points are different, should we require a transmission path record?

4.  I know we discussed the possibility of tying the new path and path cuts to our other EnPower systems.  I apologize if I did not make it clear that this would be a complicated process involving changes to those other applications.  There is currently no plan for including those features in this release.  Our goal for the first release was to replace your existing Lotus Notes system.

Again, thanks for your testing efforts.  We have come a long way due to your diligence.

Regards,
Will

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:23 PM
To:	Bentley, Corry; Poston, David; Smith, Will; Venkataswami, Vishwanatha
Cc:	Williams III, Bill; Cutsforth, Diane; Gang, Lisa; Robinson, Donald; Runswick, Stacy; Wilson, Susie
Subject:	Preschedule Workspace Testing-June 21 target date

Good Afternoon:

I have created PSW documents for all 4 of my regions for June 21, here are my findings today:

In PreSchedule Workspace:

What worked:
I was still able to successfully copy and paste large amounts of excel data into the PSW.
I was able to query build route successfully for each delivery point I needed.
I was able to change the color of text and fonts at will.
When running the Confirm function:
I was able to print the error log, which was helpful when I had to fix a few counterparty errors.
The routing speed was still very good.

What needs improvement:
The run time for the Confirm function is still far too slow to be useful in production. The rockies sheet alone took 2 hours to upload, the Mid C sheet took over two hours. I have not been able to populate the full data set because of this speed issue. I will continue uploading today, and try tomorrow to look at the full data set in confirm. I could not import the Palo Verde sheet in to confirm. I got this error message :ERROR:Access violation at address 004ED7E3 in module 'PreSchedWS.exe'. Read of address 00000000.
We need the ability to check for errors before running the sheet, I used another half hour fixing the errors and re-running the sheet.
A spot check of routing shows that the routes are still not showing the appropriate flag for physical vs non-physical. Everything shows non-physical.
Routing still did not happen on the Northwest Delivered deals that were moved in scheduling to multiple delivery points.

Question: Will the sheet support the capability of our transmission legs showing up where the E is now?  the weakness with having the path show from transmission 1, 2, etc, is it does not give the POR/POD or the firmness of the transmission.
( The way a path should look is like this: SRP@PV-E-APS(T)PV/WW O#23305 F-WALC(T)WW/MEAD O#464521 MNF-EPMI-NEVP,  the way this same path would show if put in to the sheet as it is now will be :  SRP@PV-E-APS(23305)-WALC(464521)-NEVP.  This is incomplete information.)

OR, would it be possible to modify the sheet to accept the following information in the Trans and Oasis number cells? Instead of APS,  put APS(T)PV/WW and in the OASIS cell put 23305 F.

In Path Confirmation:

What worked:
I was able to choose and reset colors that help me read the information better.
The speed to pull up an individual path is MUCH BETTER.
I was able to select a group of paths in the line view and attempt to confirm them. The save takes too long, but it worked.

What still needs work:
I still cannot sort by Global ID or Tag number. Would a different tag logic work, instead of "PWX Tag 123"  show "123 (PWX TAG)?" Some marketers use letters for tags.
The cell with the path in the expanded view must auto-size to contain all of the path.
The program needs to insert a dash in the path when each cell boundary is passed.Upstream-Supply-E-Trans-Trans-Trans-Market-Downstream.Right now some run together.
The path cut needs work, it is cumbersome, unclear on some entry requirements, and does not seem to recognize any number I put in it. This app seems like guess-work.

New path needs work as well.
	The POR and POD needs to be a type and complete field( like in build route selection) not a first letter drop down list.
	The Counterparty list is just too confusing and cumbersome to be practical. It should mimic the deal entry list.
	The new record should be three tiered.  Supply first, then market,(both mandatory entry), then transmission as an optional third. To allow a Supply without a Market 	record is going to create many problems.
	How are these new records going to be routed?
	Also, our original intent was that the new path and path cut would drive deal entry, not deal entry being done and then numbers populated into Path Cut.

I will continue testing tomorrow, the hotspots I see now are the upload speed to Path confirmation, and a close look at how we need the Path Cut and New Path to work.

We are getting there, I am very encouraged!

Cara


I owe you lunch. Lets take Bruce so I don't have to pay for it.


Mike- I have their trader coming into the office tomorrow- they are a macro
fund (they manage Harvard's endowment fund) that trades commodities- mostly
crude and metals.  I want to get them into some gas and power trades.
Specifically, I want to get them into the short Rockies trade for the summer
that we have Tudor in.

Johnny recommended I have you speak to them- can you give me a few minutes
during the day to talk to them about the west in general.

I have him in all day- we are sitting with Mike Roberts to do the weather
update from 6 am-7:30 - would be great if we could get you between 7:30 and
8:30 am.  If not, let me know when is good- Ina will know where I am

Rgds,
Caroline
cell 917-324 1999


S m o k e   a n d   S m e a r s
Christopher DeMuth and Steven Hayward
October 17, 2000

 In the closing weeks of the presidential campaign, Vice President Gore is
returning to the theme that Governor Bushs Texas has become an abysmal place
to live. It is a hard case to makeTexas is today the fifth fastest growing
state and fifth in net influx of Americans from other states, and Mr. Bush is
one of the nations most popular governors.
 Mr. Gores earlier attacks on the governors education record were set aside
following the July release of a comprehensive RAND study showing that Texas
has become the nations top state in achievement test scores. His subsequent
assertions about the number of Texans lacking health insurance seem to have
fizzled as well (it turns out that the number of uninsured has been falling
in Texas while rising in the nation as a whole). That leaves environmental
quality, where the Vice President and his ad writers have leveled a fusillade
of dramatic allegations about increasing pollution in Texass cities and
streams.
 Environmental quality presents rich opportunities for misleading data and
rhetoric. Measuring air and water pollution involves a host of variables: one
can measure pollution by emissions or by the quality of the air and water,
and measurements of air and water quality depend on the placement of
monitors, the use of *peak* versus average levels, and adjustments for
population exposure and for the widely differing health and amenity effects
of different kinds of pollution. Rankings among states are much more
problematic than rankings of school performance or health care, because all
states that are more urbanized and industrialized have higher pollution
levels. Texas accounts for 60 percent of the nations petrochemical
production capacity and 25 percent of oil refining, and it is the only state
with two metropolitan areas (Houston and Dallas-Ft. Worth) among the nations
top ten. Measured by simple gross quantities, Texas, California, and New
Jersey will have *more pollution* than most other states under any
circumstances; the rest of us can enjoy the products without having to bother
so much with the pollution-control challenges.
 Mr. Gores charges exploit these opportunities to the hilt, combining
misleading statistics with a few outright fabrications to create an
impression that bears little relationship to reality. The charges are,
however, easy to debunk, and it is surprising that they been reported with
little scrutiny by a media that has otherwise grown wary of the Vice
Presidents loose ways with facts.
 The Gore campaigns favorite charge is that Houston has passed Los Angeles
to become *the smog capital of the United States,* *No. 1 in air pollution,*
and *the dirtiest city in the nation.* (We will ignore Democratic National
Committee Chairman Joe Andrews claim that Houston has become *the dirtiest
city in the world,* which was evidently uttered in a fit of enthusiasm for
the latest party line.) The charge is false. According to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, air quality in Houston is improving and is
unambiguously better than in Los Angeles, and is also better than in many
other cities.
 The Houston charge is based on 1999 city data on ambient levels of ozoneone
of six *criteria* air pollutants regulated under the national Clean Air Act
as measured by numbers of days of *exceedences*of the EPAs national
standard. Ozone levels are highly sensitive to weather conditions, especially
temperature. They have been essentially flat in Houston in recent years (and
other southern cities such as Atlanta), but they fell sharply in Los Angeles
in 1999 due to unusually cool summer weather. As a result, Houston topped Los
Angeles (and all other cities) in ozone exceedencesbut its air quality was
nevertheless better than LAs. Houstons ozone level was 10 percent higher
than in Los Angeles, but its particulates level was 20 percent lower
(particulates are the other major component of *smog,* and according to the
EPA a far more serious health risk than ozone; there is no separate measure
of *smog*). Houston did vastly better than LA for three of the four other
Clean Air Act pollutants: 63% lower for nitrogen oxides, 64% lower for carbon
monoxide, and 78% lower for lead (the cities sulphur dioxide levels were
identical). While Houston was out of compliance with EPAs national standard
for only one pollutant, ozone, LA was out of compliance for three: ozone,
particulates, and carbon monoxide.
 We hasten to add that we are comparing Houston with Los Angeles only to
demonstrate the falsity of Mr. Gores allegation. If Houston is not number
one in air pollution, neither is it number two or even number six (Houston is
the nations sixth largest metropolitan area).  According to the EPA Air
Quality Index, which aggregates levels of all six air pollutants and weights
them according to the health risks of each, air quality in Houston is better
than in ten other metropolitan areas. Houston also bests ten other cities on
a separate EPA index of ozone alone. (These data are for 1998, the most
recent year available; rankings for 1999 and 2000 will probably be similar.)
 A related charge, and particularly egregious falsehood, is Vice President
Gores assertion that Governor Bush *made key air pollution rules in Texas
voluntary.* In 1999, Governor Bush signed two laws concerned with
*grandfathered* sources of air pollution. Under the Clean Air Act and almost
all state air pollution programs, old power plants and industrial facilities
are subject to much more lenient emissions standards than new ones. It is a
serious loophole that has been bad for the economy as well as the environment
inducing firms to maintain old facilities (both less efficient and more
polluting than new ones) for longer then they otherwise would, and leading to
protracted litigation over the difference between renovating an old facility
and building a new one. Under the 1999 legislation, Texas became one of the
first three states to begin closing the loophole through tighter standards
for old facilities. The step was praised by environmental groups and helped
coax Mr. Gore, who had not previously confronted the problem as a legislator
or Vice President, to propose a national program of his own for old power
plants. (Mr. Bush has also advanced a national proposal.)
 But there was a wrinkle in the Texas initiative: the law covering utilities
enacted mandatory standards (which will result in huge reductions in power
plant emissions over the next three years), but the law covering industrial
facilities enacted a *voluntary* compliance schedule coupled with increased
fees for noncompliance. There is legitimate disagreement over just how
effective the fee-incentive program will turn out to be; there have been some
initial reductions in the first year, apparently of about 25,000 tons of air
pollution, but the program is too recent to estimate likely future
reductions. What is not in dispute is that both the *mandatory* and
*voluntary* prongs of the Texas program constitute an extension and
tightening of air pollution controlsand an innovation that powerful business
opposition has thwarted at the national level and in most states. Nor is it
disputed that the use of economic incentives rather than regulatory mandates
may significantly improve the effectiveness of our environmental laws and are
worth a try; indeed, that is precisely the approach of the Vice Presidents
national proposal for old utilities, which consists not of mandatory
standards but *voluntary* tax incentives.
 For Mr. Gorea self-described environmentalist and reformernow to turn on
the Texas reforms and describe them as having weakened existing pollution
standards (*Bush made key air pollution rules voluntary*) is an act of
striking mendacity. His latest campaign ad adds a particularly ruthless
twist: it couples the *made voluntary* fabrication with the Houston air
quality fabrication to produce a triple falsehoodthat air pollution got
worse in Houston because Governor Bush weakened air pollution standards.
 The Vice Presidents most plenary change is that, under Governor Bush, Texas
has become *last among all states in air quality,* *No. 1 in industrial air
pollution,* and *No. 3 in water pollution.* Although the Gore campaign has
occasionally relied on newspaper articles and rankings produced by
environmental groups, its primary and only official source for these claims
is an EPA compilation called the Toxics Release Inventory. The TRI, however,
is not a useful measure of air or water pollution and is not a measure of
environmental quality at all. Instead, it measures *releases* of certain
substances that the EPA classifies as toxicand *releases* includes not only
those that pollute the air and water but also those that are properly
disposed of through EPA-approved hazardous waste management and water
treatment practices. The agencys annual TRI reports warn that its estimates
*reflect releases and other waste management activities of chemicals, not
exposures of the public to those chemicals,* and that they are not sufficient
to determine exposure or harm to the environment or public health.
 So the TRI numbers cannot possibly support Mr. Gores assertions. But even
in their own terms, they tell a story that is the opposite of what the Vice
President would like voters to believe. Texas has always been near the top of
the various TRI ratings, reflecting the states huge share of national
petrochemical and refining capacity. But it did not become No. 1 in the
overall ranking under Governor Bush, as the Gore campaign insinuates. Rather,
Texas was No. 1 under Mr. Bushs predecessor, Democratic Governor Ann
Richards, and it has improved significantly since he took office. The EPAs
1999 release of TRI data through 1997 noted that *Texas, the state with the
largest production-related waste managed in 1997, was also the state
projecting the largest absolute reduction . . . over the next two years.* The
data for 1998, released earlier this year, shows Texas leading the nation in
reduction of toxic releaseswith 43 million pounds eliminated between 1995
(the first year of Mr. Bushs governorship) and 1998. The new report also
finds Texas leading all other states in energy recovery and waste treatment,
and second in on-site recycling. Due in part to these improvements, Texas has
now dropped from first to fifth place in the TRI composite index.
 Environmental quality in Texas has improved under Governor Bush according to
virtually every useful measure. Here are a few selected statistics of our
own: According to the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission,
industrial air emissions in Texas fell 11% from 1994 through 1998. According
to the EPA, ambient air quality in Texas improved for five of the six
national air pollutants for the same period, all Texas cities but one now
meet the national standards for four or more of the six pollutants (the
exception, El Paso, due to cross-border pollution from Mexico), and half of
Texass cities are now below the national average for all six pollutants.
According to the EPA, Texass proportion of rivers and streams classified as
*impaired* is better than the national average. And according to
Environmental Defense, which prepares a comprehensive index of water quality
aggregating 15 Clean Water Act pollution measures, Texas is not *No. 3 in
water pollution* but No. 37its overall water quality is better than in 36
other states.
 Governor Bush does not get all of the credit for this record; it is also due
to the progressive tightening of national environmental standards and,
perhaps even more, to progressive improvements in production technologies.
But he gets a share of it, due to his own decisions and those of his
appointees.  And in several critical areas of environmental policy, he has
been a national leaderclosing the old plants loophole, redeveloping
*brownfields* laid waste by the perverse incentives of the Superfund program,
providing positive incentives to businesses for *pollution prevention* and to
private landowners for conservation and species protection, and improving the
financing of public parks and recreation areas. *Texas-style environmental
regulation,* which the Gore campaign invites us to fear, is, like Texas-style
school reform, something Americans can look forward to.
_____________________
Mr. DeMuth is president of the American Enterprise Institute in Washington,
D.C. and Mr. Hayward is a senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute in
San Francisco. Both are policy advisers to Texas Governor George W. Bush.
 - Enviro.wpd


Approved.

	Enron IT Purchasing@ENRON
	Sent by: Leticia Flores@ENRON
	05/11/2001 10:27 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: iBuyit eProcurement Request

Mark,
In Holly's absence please approve this request for I know that this order was
needed right away.

Thank you

	Enron IT Purchasing
	05/11/2001 08:36 AM

Sent by: Leticia Flores
To: Holly Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: iBuyit eProcurement Request

Thank you for submitting an order through iBuyit eProcurement.
Unfortunately, the system was not able to determine who should approve your
request.

Please route this document to the person who generally approves your
expenditures and have them send an email to Enron IT Purchasing denoting the
approval.

To facilitate the communication, attached you will see the list of items you
ordered.

Thank you,

For future orders, we can update the workflow table to route directly to the
approver if you provide the approvers' names.


Steve Kean and Jeff Dasovich

	"Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>
	11/22/2000 11:12 AM
	Please respond to kaplan

		 To: <kaplan@iepa.com>, <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'John Stout for Reliant'"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Curtis Keebler at Reliant'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julie @ Edson'" <jmball@ns.net>,
"'Paula Hall-Collins'" <paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Marty Wilson'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'Rob Lamkin'" <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Karen
Edson" <kedson@ns.net>, "Bob Weisenmiller" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Sue Mara"
<smara@enron.com>, "Andy Brown" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "B Brown Andy"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "Bob Escalante" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Greg
Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jan
Smutny-Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Karen
Denne" <kdenne@enron.com>, "Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Kristin
Vellandi" <kvellandi@pstrategies.com>, "Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"McNally Ray" <rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "Richard Hyde"
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Stephanie-Newell"
<stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Tom Ross" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>,
"William Hall" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Trond Aschehoug"
<taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "Tony Wetzel" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"Susan J Mara" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Steve Ponder"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steve Iliff" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "Scott Noll"
<snoll@thermoecotek.com>, "Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Randy
Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Marty McFadden"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Kent Fickett" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Ken
Hoffman" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "Joe Greco" <joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Jim Willey"
<elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Jeff Dasovich" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Hap Boyd"
<rboyd@enron.com>, "Frank DeRosa" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Eileen Koch"
<eileenk@calpine.com>, "Ed Tomeo" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Duane Nelsen"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "Dean Gosselin" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "Dave
Parquet" <dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Curt Hatton" <curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>,
"Cody Carter" <cody.carter@williams.com>, "Carolyn Baker"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bill Woods" <billw@calpine.com>, "Bill Carlson"
<wcarlson@wm.com>, "Eric Eisenman" <eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com>
		 cc: "Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>, "Susan McCabe"
<sfmccabe@mindspring.com>, "Scott Govenar" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Ron Tom"
<thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Robert Ross" <robbiz@cwo.com>, "Phil Isenberg"
<Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Maureen OHaren"
<Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Marie Moretti" <marie_moretti@msn.com>, "Hedy Govenar"
<hgovenar@acom2.com>, "Delany Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Bev
Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Anne Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Jenn Paulsen"
<paulsen@HMOT.com>, "Jamie Parker" <jparker@HMOT.com>
		 Subject: RE: Press Conference-Changed to 2:00

Greetings:

Due to a conflict in the Governors Press Room our Press conference has been
moved to 2:00 on Tuesday.  Please let me know ASAP who will be attending on
behalf of your organization.
Thanks and have a nice Thanksgiving!

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499

-----Original Message-----
From: Katie Kaplan [mailto:kaplan@iepa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 4:08 PM
To: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com; Kelli Norton [knorton@mcnallytemple.com]; 'John
Stout for Reliant'; 'Curtis Keebler at Reliant'; 'Julie @ Edson'; 'Paula
Hall-Collins'; 'Marty Wilson'; 'Rob Lamkin'; Karen Edson; Bob Weisenmiller;
Sue Mara; Andy Brown; B Brown Andy; Bob Escalante; Greg Blue; Jack Pigott;
Jan Smutny-Jones; Joe Ronan; Karen Denne; Karen Edson; Kassandra Gough;
Kristin Vellandi; Lynn Lednicky; McNally Ray; Paula Hall-Collins; Richard
Hyde; Rob L. Lamkin; Stephanie-Newell; Tom Ross; William Hall; Trond
Aschehoug; Tony Wetzel; Susan J Mara; Steve Ponder; Steve Iliff; Scott Noll;
Roger Pelote; Rob Lamkin; Randy Hickok; Paula Soos; Marty McFadden; Lynn
Lednicky; Kent Fickett; Ken Hoffman; Jonathan Weisgall; Joe Ronan; Joe
Greco; Jim Willey; Jeff Dasovich; Jack Pigott; Hap Boyd; Greg Blue; Frank
DeRosa; Eileen Koch; Ed Tomeo; Duane Nelsen; Dean Gosselin; Dave Parquet;
Curtis Kebler; Curt Hatton; Cody Carter; Carolyn Baker; Bob Escalante; Bill
Woods; Bill Carlson; Eric Eisenman
Cc: Jan Smutny-Jones; Steven Kelly; Susan McCabe; Scott Govenar; Ron Tom;
Robert Ross; Phil Isenberg; Mike Monagan; Maureen OHaren; Marie Moretti;
Kassandra Gough; Hedy Govenar; Delany Hunter; Bev Hansen; Anne Kelly; Jenn
Paulsen; Jamie Parker
Subject: Press Conference
Importance: High

Greetings:

IEP will be holding a press conference on Tuesday November 28 at 10:30 a.m.
in the Governors Press room to discuss the importance of long-term fixed
(that term is easier to understand than bilateral) contracts.

IEP will be stressing the importance of the contracts as part of the
solution for next summer. Several IEP members have offered (and have
continued to offer) long-term fixed contracts at terms under the current
retail rate freeze.  We will indicate that the utilities have been hesitant
to enter into these contracts due to the uncertain nature of the CPUC.  We
will point out that several different independent entities have agreed that
long-term contracts are one of the key solutions and that the PUC should act
immediately to set a benchmark and in so doing eliminate the reasonableness
review that is the main barrier for IOU's not entering into large long-term
fixed contracts.

IEP is also currently working to include other market participants in the
Press Conference.

We would like as many IEP participants as possible at the conference to show
that there are several companies who continue to be serious about long-term
fixed price contracts. We have already received a couple of responses and if
you are interested please let me know ASAP-no later than noon Wednesday- as
we are sending out an advisory on Monday.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


Jayendran,

Thank you for your note, and for your interest in Enron's Associate / Analyst Program.  I've copied Traci Warner who leads Recruiting for our Program.  Traci, or someone from her team will follow up with you.

I've also noted your unique mix of weather / climate training and experience, combined with your financial analysis and risk management background.  We will highlight this experience with a couple of specific groups.

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.

Best regards,
Billy Lemmons
Vice President, Associate / Analyst Program

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	<jr289@router.mail.cornell.edu>@ENRON
Sent:	Sunday, October 14, 2001 3:31 PM
To:	billy@enron.com
Subject:	Associate program at Enron

Dear Mr. Lemmons,

Please find attached my resume and a cover letter stating my interest in the
Associate program at Enron. I look forward to discussing with you soon my
interest in Enron.

At the Johnson School, I am building on my financial analysis and risk
management skills as a portfolio manager in the $2 million Cayuga MBA Fund,
LLC. Previously, I managed ocean physics projects at a consulting firm for
the National Science Foundation and the Office of Naval Research. I am keen
on combining my understanding of the physics of weather and climate with my
current training in finance, to structure various energy and finance
transactions.

Sincerely,

- Jayendran Rajamony

MBA Class of 2002

Johnson Graduate School of Management

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

 - JRajamony_resume_cover.doc


Helen-

Kali will be there at 2 pm Sunday the 14th for a private lesson.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira


FYI-

 National Desk; Section A
 Why San Diego, Where Rates First Rose, No Longer Conserves Energy
 By LAURA M. HOLSON

 01/30/2001
 The New York Times
 Page 20, Column 1
 c. 2001 New York Times Company

 SAN DIEGO, Jan. 25 -- It was here, in the heat of last summer, that
consumers got their initial lesson in how painful California's
 experiment with deregulation could be.

 With electricity supplies short and the state's power grid on the brink of
collapse, wholesale electricity costs nearly tripled, and the San
 Diego Gas and Electric Company, the first utility in the state freed by
deregulation, passed those costs on to its customers. Homeowners
 took to the streets, and businesses threatened to leave the city,
California's second largest.

 Logic would suggest that San Diego consumers, having felt the price shock
that the rest of the state so far had been shielded from, would
 be wiser about using electricity than other Californians. But the price
shock was too short.

 In September, California legislators called off the experiment, capping
retail electrical rates at 6.5 cents a kilowatt hour, the average market
 price paid in the month before the summer crisis.

 Now, six months later, San Diegans are back to their old ways.

 Electricity use, which dropped 9 percent in August, is back up to precrisis
levels, according to San Diego Gas and Electric. Rather than
 investing in insulation or energy-efficient air-conditioners, consumers here
seem to be hovering between denial and defiance.

 ''I feel I do all that I can to conserve,'' said Vicki Barber, an escrow
coordinator for a real estate broker in San Diego. ''But I'm not going
 to spend all this money upgrading my house when it doesn't matter anyway.''

 As a test laboratory of consumer behavior when the cost of a necessity
skyrockets, San Diego seems confused by how politicians reacted
 when consumers here revolted last summer, demanding relief.

 In September, when California legislators restored the lower rates,
residential and small-business rate payers received credits on their utility
 bills -- even though the credits are really a postponed debt that is
expected to come due as soon as 2002. And it is true that the utility's
 largest customers are already paying market rates.

 Still, Jeannie Thompson's reaction was typical. In August, Ms. Thompson, the
branch manager of a Coldwell Banker real estate office in
 the Pacific Beach district, made it her business to turn off office lights
and computers every night. ''When the news first came out, you
 wanted to do your part,'' she said.

 Then, in October, the office got its credit, and ''we started to go back to
the way things were before.''

 Economists look at San Diegans' behavior and draw this lesson: Consumers
must suffer a lot before they willingly give up comfort and
 conveniences they have grown used to.

 ''Summer should have been a wake-up call,'' said Peter Navarro, associate
professor of economics and public policy at the University of
 California at Irvine. ''You can't blame San Diego consumers for not doing
anything, because legislators stepped in and lowered prices. If
 the discomfort isn't of a lengthy duration, the adjustments to behavior that
need to take place won't.''

 Indeed, in a recent paper, a group of energy experts and economists,
including two Nobel Prize winners, made the same point, saying that
 if consumers knew the true cost of electricity, they would conserve more.

 Even Gov. Gray Davis seems to be backing away from his promise that rates
would not rise.

 But San Diego consumers, once again insulated from rate increases, have
shrugged off the crisis, in part because they have taken to heart
 the governor's oft-repeated claim that the problems are the fault of
out-of-state power generators that need to be reined in.

 ''Ask these people if they feel safe at night,'' Pete Phelps said wryly of
those generators. Mr. Phelps, an airline pilot, was, with his wife, Pat,
 loading a 50-gallon water heater into the back of his pickup truck at a Home
Depot near the San Diego Sports Arena.

 Mrs. Phelps added, ''You don't know what is legitimate, who to believe.''

 So the Phelpses have done little in recent months to conserve, except
turning off lights, as their monthly electricity bill has climbed to $130,
 from about $85, in the past two years. Their new water heater was billed as
''energy efficient,'' and while it should save them $150 a year,
 they did not buy it with conservation in mind. ''I spill that in beer
money,'' Mr. Phelps said.

 High prices alone cannot change consumer behavior, Mr. Navarro, the
economist, said. If consumers, for instance, believe that turning off
 lights benefits someone other than themselves, they will feel no incentive
to conserve. That, he said, is the situation in the Pacific Northwest,
 where many residents believe that any power they save will simply be
diverted to hot tubs in the San Francisco suburbs.

 But in San Diego, people have gotten a particularly mixed message. To begin
with, high rates did not last long enough to make an impact.
 Rather, the lingering impression was that legislators would step in to
protect consumers at any cost.

 The math, said Severin Borenstein, director of the University of California
Energy Institute, was simple.

 ''If you go from 6 cents to 22 cents to 6 cents, then the response will be
to weather the storm,'' Mr. Borenstein said, referring to the price
 of a kilowatt hour. ''But if it stays at 22 cents, then it makes sense for
people to go out and invest in ways to save energy.''

 Mr. Borenstein drew a parallel to the gasoline shortages of the 1970's. At
first, he said, motorists demonized Middle East oil producers, as
 lines of cars snaked around gasoline stations, waiting for rationed
supplies. Only after high prices persisted did consumers begin to change
 their habits, buying more fuel-efficient cars, he said.

 Still, some San Diegans insist that they are pitching in.

 ''I have not put the heat on,'' said Ms. Thompson, the real estate agent.
''I close my doors and put on a sweater.''

 But she has not had an energy audit of her home, a service provided by San
Diego Gas and Electric, or bought energy-saving appliances.

 During last summer's price spike, surveys by San Diego Gas and Electric
found that 91 percent of its 1.2 million users did not think the
 utility was being wholly honest with them about the crisis, said Stephen L.
Baum, chairman of Sempra Energy, the utility's parent company.
 And there is bound to be more anger, now that the utility has requested a
surcharge of about 16 percent in March, to pay off $450 million it
 owes its power suppliers.

 Higher rates will also make life harder for people who are just getting by.
At a recent outdoor farmer's market in El Cajon, a working-class
 town 15 miles east of San Diego, Heidi Van Horn, a massage therapist, and
her fiance, Bernie Herloss, a handyman, were supplementing
 their $1,200 monthly income by selling grilled bratwurst and hamburgers to
hungry shoppers.

 For the two-bedroom apartment they share, the couple have $200 in past-due
energy bills. Those bills hover at about $100 a month, up
 from $55 two years ago. ''We aren't one of these high-rollers who make $9 an
hour,'' Ms. Van Horn said. ''We either pay the electricity or
 have the phone shut off.''

 Even so, she said, they do what they can to conserve, turning down the
thermostat or turning off the occasional light. But their apartment
 building is poorly insulated. Cold wind seeps in through closed windows, and
the heating vents are near the ceiling, where the warmth is
 wasted. Their only energy-efficient light bulb is the one that came in the
mail from San Diego Gas and Electric.

 And the two birds and the iguana they keep, Ms. Van Horn said, would die if
she turned off any of the three heat lamps that run
 continuously in the apartment.

 She would never consider getting rid of the pets. Ms. Van Horn said. ''They
are family.''

 Photo: Jeannie Thompson, who manages a Coldwell Banker office in San Diego,
said energy-conservation efforts had fallen by the
 wayside. (Robert Burroughs for The New York Times)

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001
04:56 PM ---------------------------
From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 11:50 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Very rough draft of the "Enron Strategic Plan" to be sent to
Professor Duffie

Hi,

 As per your request, here is a very rough draft of the document you
requested.  It is far from being complete.

 Hopefully while in London I will have time to work on it some more.

 Your comments and feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Iris


I understand that you will be in London around 20 September.  Tom Lewthwaite
has
asked me to arrange a meeting between you, Tom and Julian Leake.  I understand
that you have met Tom and Julian before.   I would also like to attend - I am
a
manager in our UK Financial Services practice with responsibilty for Enron
from
a UK financial services perspective.  We would like to discuss any risk
management concerns that you may have and any internal initiatives with which
we
could assist.

If you are happy to meet, I would be grateful if you could let me know how you
to proceed (whether I should arrange timings with you, your secretary, someone
in London etc).  You can contact me on +44 20 7783 7446 (at Enron's London
offices) or on this e-mail address.

Kind Regards

Paul Day

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	EB3143b - Val (3-3:30)                   Casey (3:30 - 4)                   Kelley (4-4:30)

Date:		1/31/2001
Time:		3:00 PM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


i  have his marathon pictures up as wallpaper on my computer.  he is so sexy
with his shirt off.  did you have a good weekend?

do you still want to get togehter after work sometime this week?

lemme know

Danielle Samson <DanielleS@JonesGranger.com> on 03/20/2000 03:05:44 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: new address

Are you moving too, or just Brian? He he he:-)
I'm upset there are no pictures attached to this one!

-D

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Hoskins [mailto:bthoskins@hotmail.com]
<mailto:[mailto:bthoskins@hotmail.com]>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 1:20 PM
To: abamontb@slu.edu; <mailto:abamontb@slu.edu;>
alicia_sallee@hotmail.com; <mailto:alicia_sallee@hotmail.com;>
allie_easton@yahoo.com; <mailto:allie_easton@yahoo.com;>
amknoten@hotmail.com; <mailto:amknoten@hotmail.com;>  b2marina@aol.com;
<mailto:b2marina@aol.com;>  atkins@mail.utenn.edu;
<mailto:atkins@mail.utenn.edu;>  mballases@hotmail.com;
<mailto:mballases@hotmail.com;>  bevfb@aol.com; <mailto:bevfb@aol.com;>
bpjackson@mediaone.net; <mailto:bpjackson@mediaone.net;>
lechafin312@hotmail.com; <mailto:lechafin312@hotmail.com;>
chrish@fogartyklein.com; <mailto:chrish@fogartyklein.com;>
walker.c.cunningham@vanderbilt.edu;
<mailto:walker.c.cunningham@vanderbilt.edu;>  danielles@jonesgranger.com;
<mailto:danielles@jonesgranger.com;>  eljinsha@yahoo.com;
<mailto:eljinsha@yahoo.com;>  g4k4jj@aol.com; <mailto:g4k4jj@aol.com;>
zone@aristotle.net; <mailto:zone@aristotle.net;>  hoganlee@hotmail.com;
<mailto:hoganlee@hotmail.com;>  bhuels01@bellarmine.edu;
<mailto:bhuels01@bellarmine.edu;>  jzook@wfubmc.edu;
<mailto:jzook@wfubmc.edu;>  jay@jay.net; <mailto:jay@jay.net;>
jhoskins@seidlercos.com; <mailto:jhoskins@seidlercos.com;>
billandjennifer@hotmail.com; <mailto:billandjennifer@hotmail.com;>
jessica_n_burke@hotmail.com; <mailto:jessica_n_burke@hotmail.com;>
jaholzer@bellsouth.net; <mailto:jaholzer@bellsouth.net;>  katschott@usa.net;
<mailto:katschott@usa.net;>  kselinger@houston.geoquest.slb.com;
<mailto:kselinger@houston.geoquest.slb.com;>  krisy_p@hotmail.com;
<mailto:krisy_p@hotmail.com;>  l-walsh@nwu.edu; <mailto:l-walsh@nwu.edu;>
lfjohn0@hotmail.com; <mailto:lfjohn0@hotmail.com;>  leninej@hotmail.com;
<mailto:leninej@hotmail.com;>  ecarraro@hotmail.com;
<mailto:ecarraro@hotmail.com;>  stephen.kempf@nortonhealthcare.org;
<mailto:stephen.kempf@nortonhealthcare.org;>  christopherlui@hotmail.com;
<mailto:christopherlui@hotmail.com;>  maeve.hughes@mwk.com;
<mailto:maeve.hughes@mwk.com;>  mpotter@houston.geoquest.slb.com;
<mailto:mpotter@houston.geoquest.slb.com;>  mpstan0@pop.uky.edu;
<mailto:mpstan0@pop.uky.edu;>  caphoskins@hotmail.com;
<mailto:caphoskins@hotmail.com;>  caroline.j.nagel@vanderbilt.edu;
<mailto:caroline.j.nagel@vanderbilt.edu;>  texas_delight@hotmail.com;
<mailto:texas_delight@hotmail.com;>  olympia_kershner@hotmail.com;
<mailto:olympia_kershner@hotmail.com;>  alhos@aol.com;
<mailto:alhos@aol.com;>  stupor@home.com; <mailto:stupor@home.com;>
credders@beerscc.com; <mailto:credders@beerscc.com;>
robin.moore@batesville.com; <mailto:robin.moore@batesville.com;>
roman14@hotmail.com; <mailto:roman14@hotmail.com;>  rooneya@epenergy.com;
<mailto:rooneya@epenergy.com;>  tcgdoc@aol.com; <mailto:tcgdoc@aol.com;>
sailer100@hotmail.com; <mailto:sailer100@hotmail.com;>
warreng76@hotmail.com; <mailto:warreng76@hotmail.com;>
kfwill01@gwise.louisville.edu <mailto:kfwill01@gwise.louisville.edu>
Subject: new address

Happy St. Patrick's Day!
I'm moving this weekend to another apartment in the same complex.  We're
overlooking the pool now, so stop by and visit.  I've attached the new
address.  Phone numbers will remain the same.

Things here in Houston are going well.  I'm going to Eastern Europe March
29-April 11.  The tentative schedule is Budapest, Prague, Munich, Salzberg,
Vienna, and Marseille.  The weekend after I get back is the MS-150 bike ride

from Houston to Austin, so wish me luck!

Hope all's well,
Brian

Brian T. Hoskins
Home:                          Office:
2302 Travis St.                Enron North America
#8225                          P.O. Box 1188
Houston, TX 77006              Houston, TX 77251-1188
(713) 526-8304                 (713) 853-0380
(815) 352-2164 (Fax)           (800) 97-ENRON, ext. 30380

email:
bthoskins@hotmail.com <mailto:bthoskins@hotmail.com>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<http://www.hotmail.com>


Mark, Ken

Please see below.  I will separately the Appendices should you wish to see
these

Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 20/09/2000 19:32
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Karen Anderson" <Karen.Anderson@simmons-simmons.com>
         20/09/2000 12:49

To: <justin.boyd@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Marketing Foreign Futures & Options Under CFTC Rules Part 30

Please note: This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. Please
notify us immediately if you are not the intended recipient. You should not
copy it, forward it or use it for any purpose or disclose the contents to any
person.
-----------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr Boyd

I refer to our earlier telephone conversation regarding the above document.
Minor text corrections have been made and accordingly I attach a revised copy.

I am unable to attach Appendix A and B via email.  Please let me know if you
would like me to send a hard copy to you.

Kind regards.

Karen Anderson
Secretary to Dr Ned Swan

------------------------------------------------------------
Simmons & Simmons
21 Wilson Street
London
EC2M 2TX

Tel +44 (0)20 7628 2020
Fax +44 (0)20 7628 2070
DX  12 London/Chancery Ln

An international law firm
London Paris Brussels Lisbon Milan Rome Abu Dhabi Hong Kong Shanghai New York

A list of partners at each office can be provided on request.

www.simmons-simmons.com

www.elexica.com is the award winning interactive online legal resource by
lawyers for lawyers, powered by content from Simmons & Simmons.

 - 147; 650FFC - Marketing of Futures and Options in the US.doc


Fyi.  This is the EES reorganization memo.
Janine
----- Forwarded by Janine Migden/NA/Enron on 03/28/2001 10:23 AM -----

	Nicole Schwartz@EES
	03/28/2001 09:02 AM

		 To: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: all employee meeting

hope this one works...sorry for the delay.

---------------------- Forwarded by Nicole Schwartz/HOU/EES on 03/28/2001
09:01 AM ---------------------------

Janine Migden@ENRON

03/28/2001 08:50 AM

To: Nicole Schwartz/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:

Can you try sending me the email on the reorg.  Still didn't get it.

Thanks.

Janine


     LYDIA CANNON is now enrolled in:

	     XMS (Expense Management System) - New Users

	     1400 Smith Street

	     Houston TX - Room 20

	     135.00

	     Class days and Times:

	     06/19/2001 - 06/19/2001

	Click here to review class session information.

	We look forward to seeing LYDIA in class.  Please call the Development Center at 713 853-0357 if you have any questions.

	Cancellation Policy:

	Cancellation of class must be received at least 3 business days prior to class time in order to prevent charges to your Cost Center.
	All "No Shows" will be charged the full cost of the course. Substitutes may be sent provided they have satisfied all course prerequisites.


> We understand that the London portion of the Restructuring Meeting on
> November 13 was not as comprehensive as members would have preferred,
> partly as a result of logistical difficulties.  I will be in London from
> December 13th - 15th and would like to have a meeting in London on
> December 14 from 4:30 - 6:00 p.m. at UBS Warburg's offices at 100
> Liverpool Street to hear the views of our London members on the
> Restructuring issue and to report on any subsequent developments.  If you
> would like to attend this meeting, please send an email to Barbara Hanlon
> at bhanlon@isda.org.
>
> We have attached a copy of the minutes of the November 13 meeting.
>
>
Robert Pickel
General Counsel
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
600 Fifth Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, New York 10020-2302
Phone: (212) 332-1200
Fax: (212) 332-1212
http://www.isda.org

>  <<Minutes on  Restructuring Meeting.doc>>

 - Minutes on  Restructuring Meeting.doc


No not a promise but it more or less went like this:  Kathy:  "Lavo, you have
caused me a lot of grief by taking both Ryan and Chad, you wouldn't believe
the overtime I had to work.  I should get some kind of hiring bonus or
something".  John:  "Well if you go three for three you're on".

I have read that the average cost of hiring/training someone is approx
$80,000.  I am willing to accept much less than this.  Actually I don't
really expect anything I just thought I would give it a shot.

Kathy

From: John J Lavorato@ENRON on 01/19/2001 08:28 AM CST
To: Kathy Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Three for Three

In all seriousness, did I promise you a payment.


This FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2000 (5:00 p.m. CST) is the deadline for deferral
program enrollment.  Following the deadline, no new elections or changes to
existing elections will be accepted.
To learn more about your deferral program opportunities and to enroll for
2001 deferrals, access eHRonline at http://ehronline.enron.com.  (Call the
ISC Help Desk at 713-345-4727 if you need your ID or password to access the
system.)

1. Review the program descriptions (attached to the Election Form) before you
make your elections.
2. If you decide to defer compensation, complete the Election Form before
Friday, December 8,  2000, 5:00 p.m. CST (the enrollment deadline).
3. Print your 2001 Election Form and Confirmation Statement right from the
web site and you,re   finished!

DEFERRAL ENROLLMENT 2001--ADDED VALUE FOR YOUR FUTURE


Please see attached revised "MAC" concerning Net Worth ratio per credit's
request to change ratio in the Master.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Gerald,

I have sent your ticket application through with Longhorn Foundation
priority noted.  Our office and the Foundation staff will be processing
orders throughout June and July.  Tickets will be mailed out in August.

Hook 'em

Mark Harrison

At 11:45 AM 5/15/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>Mark,  I joined the foundation today and should be in the system.  Let me
know
>if there is anything else you need.
>
>Thanks for your help.
>Gerald Nemec
>


Don't know the answers. We need to visit with Herman Manis to get his buy-in
on an approach.  I have a call in to him on another transaction, so I'll
ask.  Are you in Houston today?

ckm

From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 09:26 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: SDEC: Certosa Holdings Option Agreement

Does the first option need to expire or can we terminate prior to expiration
and concurrent with execution of a new option agreement?  I got a call from
the owner of Certosa Holdings pleading for help on reimbursement of those
legal fees.   If we are going to pay a flat fee and renegotiate this
agreement, I think we need to do so quickly.   Regardless, I need to tell
them something soon.  They are getting desparate.  I've a call in to Taffy
Milligan. AEW's assistant to locate the Shutts & Bowen invoice.

I understand we have engaged Shutts & Bowen in Tallahassee to review some
property tax issue.  Cound this be an avenue to avoid this on balance sheet
hard cost thang?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 7:43 AM
To: Krause, Greg
Subject: RE: AEW's backup

Unless the first option expires (and the original premium is expensed), you
add the original payment to the renewal premium to determine the percentage.
If we can't beat the percentage game, we can have the land on the balance
sheet and that won't put the entire project on it.  Don't ask me to splain
that, because I can't.  If the land is going to be on the balance sheet, you
would think that it would be better to have $1.3 on than $4.2.  However, one
thing I don't know (haven't asked) is what the environmental restrictions are
with our financing vehicle.  I don't know if the land has to be clean before
it can go into the vehicle.  I can ask.  If it is required to be clean, then
you may be back to the $4.2 anyway.

Kay

PS.  Feel like Alice in Wonderland  yet?

From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 07:14 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: AEW's backup

Yes we do want to renew the option through September of next year and we will
need to persuade them to lower the option premium.  Her is a thought:  the
land fill closure cost is approximately $2.9 million.  Could we create a new
option agreement that states that the strike price is $4.2 million ($1.3 the
original strike price plus the cost of land fill closure cost) so we could
pay an option premium of up to $210,000 (5% of $4.2 million).  At closing, we
reduce the purchase price by the costs yet to be incurred in the closing the
land fill.  Since Certosa Holdings will not start the closure until they are
assured that we will exercise the option if even then, the net cost to us
would drop back to  the original strike price.  Could we get this past the
accountants?

Only the memorandum of option was recorded.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:40 PM
To: Krause, Greg
Cc: Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject: RE: AEW's backup

I've skimmed it.  I see that the option expires August 9th.  Are we planning
to renew it?  If so maybe we can renew early and fix what we can to preserve
some optionality (no pun intended) and cover the fee issue.  Might take too
long to address the immediate issue.

I don't see anyway we can get around the balance sheet issue unless we let
the option expire and then reoption, but in that case the option payment
would have to be smaller (acct says an option of 5% creates a problem as it
would be considered a down payment).  Just fyi.

Kathleen, was the option recorded, or just a memo of option, or neither?  I'm
just wondering what is public info.

Herman is out of the office today, but I can discuss the fee issue to get his
vote.

More to come...

ckm

From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 02:19 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: AEW's backup

I think the invoice was for between $20,000 and $30,000, but I can't
remember.  AEW has the invoice.  This probably will not be the final as we
will need to work with them in discussions with DERM on delaying the landfill
closure and in moving jurisdiction of the project from CZAB to the County
Commissioners.   I think Shutts & Bowen (who may get stiffed by their client
if this deal blows up) and Certosa Holdings would be open to any suggestions
and we need to renegotiate the option anyway.  Shall I call and suggest this
this flat fee for retooling the option agreement to them or shall we do it
together?  I,m not sure I could explain to them acequately the idiosyncrasies
of our accounting requirements.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:00 PM
To: Krause, Greg
Subject: RE: AEW's backup

How much is it and should this be the final amount?  One thought I have is
that maybe we can retool the option agreement so that we pay them a flat fee,
which is enough to cover the expenditures.  Don't know if this works, but it
is one thought.  What do you think?

Kay

From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 01:50 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: AEW's backup

One more thing on the SDEC project:  According to the option agreement we
executed last October, we agreed to reimburse Certosa Holdings for actual
third party costs that they incurred in support of our necessary
applications, submittals and in seeking local approval.  Several weeks ago,
we recieved an invoice from Shutts & Bowen, attorney for Certosa Holdings
requesting reimbursement pursuant to the contract.  I forwarded this invoice
on th Ann Elizabeth not necessarily to pay for but to review considering this
whole soft cost hard cost discussion.  I recieved another call this morning
from Shutts & Bowen asking about the invoice.  What should I do?
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Krause, Greg
Subject: RE: AEW's backup

Greg,

You can call me on whatever you have, including Midway, SDEC and Medley
Dunn.  If I have a problem getting to something, I'll find help.

Kay

From: Greg Krause/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 10:50 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: AEW's backup

Kay,

Ann Elizabeth did not provide a designated hitter for the South Dade Energy
Center (Dade Development Company LLC is Optionee, Certosa Holdings is
Optionor) nor did she provide one for tne Medley Dunn project.  I have been
told that the Dunns are considering backing off their ultimatums that they
gave Ann Elizabeth and I regarding taxes to the town and assumption of
enviromental liability.  Who do I talk to about the Dunn contract while Ann
Elizabeth is out?
 -----Original Message-----
From:  White, Ann Elizabeth
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 10:33 PM
To: gkrause@enron.com; Krimsky, Steven; Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Carnahan,
Kathleen
Cc: Milligan, Taffy
Subject: AEW's backup

Kay Mann is the designated hitter for the Pompano and Deerfied projects while
I'm on vacation.  I've given her a down load of the status of Greg and
Steve's projects.  Chris Boehler at A&K will be the designated hitter for
Midway.  I'm not going to check my voice mail while I'm gone but, if
necessary, here are the contact numbers while I'm gone.

Walter and Marlena Schilling  011-49-8218-89351 schilling.jun@freenet.de

Monika and Bernhard Steinacher 011-49-8232-8932 m.steinacher@schwabmuenchen.de

If you call, Walter and Bernhard and Bernhard's daughter, Susanne, speak very
good English.  Monika's isn't bad.  Marlena may get flustered and hang up on
you.

Best of luck at Deerfield and hope to see Pompano on track when I get back in
the office on June 11th.  Kay is planning on going to Florida on June 12 for
the moratorium hearing and the rezoning hearing.


We need to work through this.. some of this amount needs to go to the New York short term trader.. I am going to look into and will need a breakdown from you day by for these days(8/6 thru 8/10).

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mansfield, Marci
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:23 PM
To:	Thomas, Paul D.
Subject:	RE: August Trans Loss Charges

 $151,349.24 	 $59,330.85
700778.3	700783.3

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thomas, Paul D.
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:23 PM
To:	Mansfield, Marci
Subject:	RE: August Trans Loss Charges

What is the amount?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mansfield, Marci
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Thomas, Paul D.
Cc:	Evans, Casey; Grace, Rebecca M.; Franklin, Warrick
Subject:	August Trans Loss Charges

Paul:

The estimated trans loss charges for August have been entered (NE Hourly # 700778.3 @ ; NE Phys # 700783.3).  They're unusually high due to the increase in deal volumes as well as inflated prices due to extreme heat (08/06 thru 08/10 in particuar).  If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to come by and discuss with me or Rebecca.  Just wanted to give you a heads up.

-Marci


CA Assembly Passes Bill to Cut Power Rates

CA Passes Power Plant Construction Measure

Enron Bid Offers

Deregulation Editorials

(Economist European Edition)


Effective today, Credit has approved selling Balance of the Month (BOM) for
Dec 2000 to any of the three IOU's:  Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southern
California Edison Company, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company.

Please keep Credit informed of ALL balance of the month transactions with any
of these counterparties.

Regards,
Tracy


Attached please find the Natural Gas market analysis for today.

Thanks,

Bob McKinney

 - 11-26-01 Nat Gas.doc


Attached is my changes redlined against your latest version.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/11/2000 07:31
AM ---------------------------

Tommy Garza
07/10/2000 12:23 PM
To: Chris Behney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James L
Copeland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gene L Brantz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ngoc Luan
Do/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wayne Feng/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tommy
Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, David L
Glessner/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Angela Hylton/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Dan Kirtane/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joshua M Langford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Littel/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Joseph Eric
Maier/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David McEllin/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Dave McMullan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert S Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Angela
Sayegh/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Norm Spalding/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Agatha B Tran/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bob
Meckna/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James
Pfeffer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Olson/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
lmchurch@flash.net, Tommy Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alex
Arriaga/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Horn/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, George
Weber/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Weltz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Reyna Cabrera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ace Roman/HOU/ECT, Todd Thelen/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Erwin Grose/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tracee Bersani/HOU/ECT, Sharad
Malhotra/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Valter Stoiani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jackie
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Horn <David.Horn@sage.nelesautomation.com> @ ENRON,
Shyril L Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniele Crelin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Frank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jin Guo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timmy Ng/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Armstrong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles Barker
Varnell/DEN/ECT@Enron, Gregg Lenart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Candi Stanley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christopher Riley/HOU/EES@EES, Trina Samuel/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle
Juden/HOU/EES@EES, Yasir Khan/HOU/EES@EES, Jerry Spencer/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON,
Lisa Costello/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Joni
Moeller/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rosalinda V
Gonzalez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sherryl
Stone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Brower/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jean Eakins/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Barbara
Rose/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carolyn Henry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amy
Oberg/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle Robichaux/HOU/EES@EES, Zulema
Ibarra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ahmed Malik/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Maria Luna/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Edward Jr
Chavez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Patrick
Dominguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael Neves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carol Essig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Guy Schlein/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniella
Carneiro/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra Hrna/HOU/ECT@ect, Adrial
Boals/Corp/Enron@Enron, George Thomas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Abrar Sait/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Steve Iyer, Cecilia
Ramirez/NA/Enron@ENRON, George Thomas/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: JULY 15TH DOUBLES TOURNAMENT.

ENRON TENNIS ASSOCIATION TOURNAMENT

WHERE: THE METROP0LITIAN RACQUET CLUB
ONE ALLEN CENTER     Houston TX. 77002
WHEN:  SATURDAY, JULY 15TH, 2000

TIME:  9:00 A.M.  TO  1:00 P.M.

FORMAT: DOUBLES

Warm up begins at 9: a.m.  And play starts at 9:30 a.m.
Dues are $25.00 for the season.
It can be paid at the tournament or sent to any of the officers of the Tennis
Committee.
Make checks payable to &Enron Corp8.
A new waiver of liability form will need to be completed by each player prior
to the tournament.
Food and drinks will be provided.
Those planning to attend please RSVP by Thursday 13th, 2000.
Due to limited court space and time

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact any one of the Enron
Tennis Association Committee:
Tommy Garza @3-6686, Gene Brantz @6-7428, James Pfeffer @6-7685, Dan Olson @
3-5601 or Robert Smith @6-7427.

Thanks and we look forward to seeing you there.

Feel free to pass this information on to any one else interested in
participating with the Tennis Association.


Hello ,

Bom traded 31 and 31.25 for 50 MW here and 25 MW  away at the same time.
Feb lifted 32.25 , 32 away
Mar goes out 32.25 at 33.25
April hit 30
Q2 31.75 and 31.5
Feb Dec traded 33.5
Ciao


As you know, I have great interest.  However, I've checked flight schedules
to come out Tuesday night, and to put it mildly, it's very ugly.  Seems like
alot to arrive in D.C. around 3 AM only to turn around and head back to the
left coast the next day at 3-4 PM.  But I think the meeting should go ahead
and take place anyway.  Is there any chance that Lisa could get a phone in
your meeting room so that I could participate by conference call?  Sorry for
the headache.  Let me know.  Thanks again for the chat this PM.

Best,
Jeff

Paul Kaufman@ECT
09/06/2000 07:06 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona Petrochko, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: lysa.akin@enron.com@ECT
Subject: MEETING RE: CALIFORNIA

By this e-mail I'm requesting that we all meet on Wednesday, September 13,
2000, for breakfast to discuss the California/FERC wholesale issues that have
been plaguing us and will plague us over the next year or so.   I suggest
that the meeting be limited to:  (1) an identification of the inventory of
forums we are facing; and (2) our allocation of resources to the inventory.
If time permits, we can also have a substantive discussion of the issues.  In
this regard, if its ready, we can present an overview of the California
strategy that is being developed (initially) by Sandi and Jeff.

Respond ASAP directly to Lysa Akin with your interest in participating in
this meeting.

Lysa:  once we have a head count, please get us a meeting room and
breakfast.  We'll need an easel with paper and markers.