[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for TXN  follows from EquityAlert.com.     CORRECTION-Texas Instruments Posts Narrower-Than-Expected Loss, Warns For Next Quarter     (RealTimeTraders.com) - In the previous headline "Misses Estimate By $0.01" should read "Beats Estimate By $0.01."  A corrected and updated story follows: Texas Instruments Inc. (TXN) reported a loss for the third quarter Wednesday that was a penny narrower than expected, but the company warned of a wider loss in the next fiscal period. The company reported a pro forma loss for the quarter of $57 million, or $0.03 per share, down from a profit of $589 million, or $0.33 per share, in the same period last year. Wall Street analysts had expected the company to lose $0.04 per share, according to a survey conducted by First Call/Thomson Financial. The company said revenues for the quarter were down significantly as well, falling from $3.13 billion last year to $1.85 billion this year. Looking ahead, the company said that it will have a loss for the fourth quarter of approximately $0.09 per share.  Market analysts currently project the firm will lose $0.01 per share. Texas Instruments closed Wednesday's trading at $29.91, down $1.58 on a volume of 11.4 million.  The stock has lost an additional 91 cents on a volume of 31,600 shares in after hours action. Copyright(c) 2001 RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	[IMAGE]     [IMAGE]


are you here?


Thank both of you for stopping by to visit last Friday.  It was good to see
you.
I hope Enron can get some of their "creative juices" going and figure out a
way
that the City of Mesa can compliment their gas contract with their electric
needs.   I think there are some opportunities out there.

Kim, two things.  One regarding capacity releasing:  our billing determinant
is
14,247 and we can release the difference of this number and what our load will
be.  Sorry, I just had to think about it after the meeting.  Also, regarding
this matter, one must consider the conditions of pre-arranged deals.  There
are
some hurdles, but all "doable" once we get our thinking caps on.

Two, I did not realize that you were on the electric side for awhile.  I am in
somewhat of a "learning mode" regarding electric and was wondering if you
could
just "jam" with me about the electric side.  I understand the concepts because
of my position on the gas side, but I want to learn the players and some
strategies.  Dave, I think you could teach me a thing or two also.

Let me know.

Jan


Today's Hottest Travel Deals from Bestfares.com!

On November 19, 2001 we introduced Quickfare Finder.  We receive up to
200,000-plus travel requests per day.  We also monitor over 6 million
airfares at least three times a day.  As we promised, today we would like
to introduce to you ?City Low Fare Search.?  A great travel tool for the
lowest airfares from your departing airport.

Have you ever wondered what the top 20 cheapest cities were from your home
airport?  How about the top 50 cities or what the cheapest airfares are to
Canada, the Caribbean, Mexico, Hawaii, Alaska or Central and South
America?

Now you can find unbelievable airfares up to 80 percent off to over 150
destinations.  Did you know that we have airfares for $55 roundtrip or
less departing from San Diego, Los Angeles, Ontario (CA), Burbank,
Phoenix, Las Vegas, St. Louis, Kansas City, Detroit or Chicago?  Now, we
know you must be curious about the cheapest cities from your home airport,
and in just a few seconds, the answer is just a click away. Visit

http://quickfares.bestfares.com/quickfare/qfsearch.jsp

P.S. ?Coming Next Week Our New Automated Snooze You Lose Fares

One final note, if you?re seeking last minute getaways for Christmas and
New Year's, cheap seats are very limited or do not exist at all for the
holidays to Florida, the Caribbean, Mexico, Hawaii or west of the Rockies.
 This may be a good time to review our last minute airfares and hotel
program. The fares for the holiday season will be slightly higher than
normal, but when you compare it to the lowest published fare, you still
may save big bucks. Check out Quickfare Finder today or try our last
minute getaways, we may have just the ticket for reasonable holiday
travel! Visit the Quickfare Finder at

http://quickfares.bestfares.com/quickfare/qfsearch.jsp
or our Last-Minute Weekend Getaways section at

http://lastminutesecure.bestfares.com

You are currently subscribed to hot_deals as mcuilla@ENRON.COM

To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-hot_deals-1918710O@hotdeals.bestfares.com

Copyright 2001 by Bestfares USA Inc. All rights reserved.


Congratulations! This eBay item has successfully ended.

Item name:              Star Wars CCG CORUSCANT Sealed Booster Box
Item number:            1624983525
Final price:            $57.00
End date:               Aug-12-01 12:46:48 PDT
Number of bids:         9
Seller User ID:         heartie
Seller email:           jrmudra@pacbell.net
High-bidder User ID:    jason.wolfe@enron.com
High-bidder email:      jason.wolfe@enron.com

To view this item for up to 90 days, click here:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1624983525&ed=997645608

Here's what to do next:

- The bidder and seller should contact each other within three business days to complete the sale.  Winning bidders should send payment directly to the seller.
If you need help, click here: http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MemberSearchShow

- Once you complete the transaction, please leave feedback at: http://cgi2.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?LeaveFeedbackShow&item=1624983525

*******************************************************************************
*******************************************************************************

Copyright 1995-2001 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated
trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.


Happy New Year and thanks again for your support on the Arena Prop.

A consulting group that I have worked with over the last 10 years in
California tells me there may be an initiative in 2002 (March or November)
to undo electric deregulation there.  This group is Woodward & McDowell.
They specialize in propositions.

In 2000, Baselice & Associates polled in their success efforts to defeat
Prop 25 (march) and pass Prop 35 (nov).  I highly recommend that any
coalition formed to defeat a proposition in California contact Woodward &
McDowell.  Call me if you would like to know more about them, or just call
Dave Fogarty at 650-340-0470.

Mike

MICHAEL BASELICE
Baselice & Associates, Inc.
4131 Spicewood Springs Road
Suite O-2
Austin, TX  78759
Phone: (512) 345-9720
Fax: (512) 345-9740
email: mikeb@baselice.com


Magda Manigque
magda.manigque@kp.org

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Magda Manigque


Hi Gillian-
I was about to hit "send" on this email to you when your arrived. Pardon me for not reviewing the latest draft, but rather I'm sending you my comments as written.
Thanks-
Michele

Regarding Mike Smith's questions:

1. In that congestion is the differential between the PJM price and the zonal price, congestion is a non-issue for the index product.  We will not bear any congestion costs, and referencing it in the agreement may cause confusion.

2. Regarding the contingency that BGE cease to exist or be renamed I suggest something along the lines of--  "we shall substitute a comparable zonal price."

After our previous conversation I discussed this with Richard Ring, and we agree it may be disadvantageous to refer to the "closest", or specifically mention the zone where we physically schedule, because it's impossible to foresee what shape these changes may take. And it's certainly better if we can make a reasonable decision as to a substitute zonal price.

Mike may want additional language--that you will notify them of the new zone and give them an opportunity to disagree--but all those details are beyond my expertise.

Please note that this is the one situation where congestion may--but is unlikely to--apply, if the new zone is farther away from the load then before. Let's assume for a moment that it is far more likely that the zone would be broken in to two zones than for it to be eliminated.  Furthermore, specific mention of congestion implies that we will also credit the customer for any negative congestion that may apply, which opens an entirely new matter. Let me know if you want more clarification of this point.

3. The Deficiency Rate is defined in the PJM Reliability Assurance Agreement.

4. The Ancillary Services are defined in the Operating Agreement and the OATT, the calculations are defined in the Operating Agreement Accounting and OATT Accounting Manuals (M-28 and M-27), and the rates are posted on the PJM website or otherwise published annually as may apply.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Gillian
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Raque, Michele
Cc:	Ring, Richard; Smith, Mike
Subject:	Most recent version of TC

Michele,

As we discussed, please address the two issues that Mike discussed in the TC regarding ICAP and ancillaries.

Please also confirm the following.  You have deleted congestion as one of the pass-through components because it is inherently included in the LMP.  Does it do any harm leaving it in the contract?

In his last email Mike asked whether or not there was any chance that there could be a difference between the EESI Energy Price as we have defined it and the Spot Energy price.  This would be a critical issue for the site profile desk.  Please confirm that we are taking great pains to describe this in such a way that there would be no delta between the two.

I have included language from Mike regarding the customer's ability to lock in to a fixed price at any point.

Lastly, Mike, I agree with your changes related to the transmission issue.  It does appear to be included in the paragraph above.

Related to Anticipated Usage, Bob and I thought that listing it twice (e.g., we will pay you an amount each month equal to the product of the Anticipated Usage for such month and $0.[    ] per kWh of Anticipated Usage) was redundant but frankly it does no harm to leave it as is.

 << File: MD Master confirm DISC-INDEX 10-8 DRAFT DO NOT USE gj.doc >>


According to Gary Hanks, we would like to have the gas on the valley line
anyway
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
03:26 PM ---------------------------
To: Jill T Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Producer service group?

I can not believe you are sending emails form Hawaii!!!!  You are crazy.  I
took care of Camden for the month-
It is now 330 and Hilcorp has not responded.  I spoke with Jerry Bubert
several times today- emailed Mike LAnnou and left messages, and had him
paged, and copied Hildebrand (the president).  If we don't hear by 4pm, we
are supposed to bypass the gas...........


Mark/Holly,

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Vivian
5-3995


Thanks for the message. I am traveling on the days when you offer the class.
Please, keep me in mind.

Vince

The MathWorks <mathworks-mail@mathworks.com> on 03/08/2000 12:59:24 PM
Please respond to training@mathworks.com
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MATLAB, Simulink and Stateflow Training in Houston !!!

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In response to your requests we have scheduled a week of training in
Houston. Learn MATLAB, Simulink, and Stateflow as taught by our expert
trainers.

We have confirmed a time and place, now we just need your commitment
to attend.  Please share this information with your collegues !!

Location :

5555 San Felipe, Suite 1500
Houston, TX 77056

Dates :

4/3, 4/4  MATLAB Training       $990.00
4/4, 4/6  Simulink Training     $990.00
4/7         Stateflow Training  $495.00

How to sign up for a course :

Use a Credit Card and sign up at our web store :
http://www.mathworks.com/store/index.html

or

Fax your P.O. to 508-647-4468

Contact Scott Wakefield if you have additional questions.

Reserve your spot quickly !!!!  Only 12 spots are available and will fill
quickly.

Cancellation Policy
Tuition is fully refundable if we receive written notification (via mail
or email) of cancellation on or before 7 business days prior to class.
Cancellations made less than 7 business days prior to class will be
charged 25% of the class tuition fee. If you fail to show up to class
without written notice, you will be charged for the full tuition. A
substitute may be sent in your place to avoid a fee.

I look forward to helping you attend this valuable training

Scott Wakefield
Territory Manager
The MathWorks

==================================
Scott Wakefield
The MathWorks, Inc.
Phone: (508) 647-7282
http://www.mathworks.com
==================================

VANTIVE: 275861
6314


THE SOURCE
The eSource Bulletin	October 2001
COMPANY INFORMATION
?	Looking for a company's?.?
Business Description	Executives/Bios	Financials
Facilities	Competitors	Subsidiaries
SIC Codes	Government/SEC Filings	Lawsuits
Global Securities	Public Records	Commodity Pricing
Technical Publications	Intellectual Property	News
Credit Reports	Economic Analysis	Global Industries
Market Research Reports	Analyst Reports	Strategic Alliances/JVs
Global Credit Ratings	Mergers & Acquisitions	Syndicated Loans
Restructures	Corporate Governance	Venture Capital

Information is available for public, foreign and private companies on a real-time, historical and forecast basis.
?	Where do I look for general information on a company?  Company website, Hoovers, Dow Jones Interactive, Nexis-Company Dossier, Yahoo market guide
?	Where are corporate financials or equity information?  SEC filings (10-K, 10-Q), Analyst reports, Global Disclosure, Dunn & Bradstreet*, Million Dollar Database*, Bloomberg*, Firstcall*, investex*, Multex*
?	Where can I find a company's credit rating?  Standard & Poors' , Moody's and Fitch
?	I cannot find any information on a company, why not?
1.	Check the spelling of the company name
2.	The company is a subsidiary and/or its parent is a foreign entity (non US)
3.	It may be a Private Company (information is not readily available)
4.	Contact eSource (http://esource.enron.com/RequestSearch.asp)  with your detailed request.
	Web Sources	Proprietary Databases
General:	Bloomberg
www.yahoo.com	Dialog
www.fool.com	Dun & Bradstreet
www.redherring.com	FactSet
www.corporateinformation.com	FirstCall
www.allbusiness.com	FIS Online
www.moneycentral.msn.com	Global Access
General (need password): 	Hoover's
www.hoovers.com	Investex
www.djinteractive.com	MillionDollarDatabase
www.nexis.com	Moody's
Financial:	Multex
www.areport.com	SDC
www.sec.gov	Standard & Poors
www.financials.com	Skyminder
www.tenkwizzard.com	LiveEdgar
www.usatoday.com

*Fee-based, available through eSource: 713-853-7877
Check out these and other great web sources at http://esource.enron.com


I've sent a calendar invitation from Eric Gadd to you for a previously mentioned meeting.  Something didn't go through properly.  If you didn't get the invitation or can't attend, please let me know.  Thanks.


On the mark in many respects. Very Good!

Hope you are having a great day!

Craig

XXX

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan.Scott@enron.com [mailto:Susan.Scott@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 4:33 PM
To: craigl@calpine.com
Subject: hooked on astrology

From astrology.com (must I beware of overindulgence in such websites?)
I like the part about charm and charisma and think it is very true.

Sagittarius and Sagittarius
When two Sagittarians join together in a love match, the truth-loving
natures
makes theirs a near perfect relationship. This couple views the world around
them with an educated eye and both share an intense hunger for more
knowledge. They will engage one another in pleasant conversation and
banter that challenges and tickles the mind.  An occasional hotheaded
dispute
can erupt in the Sagittarius-Sagittarius relationship, when one fact-fanatic
Sag
partner carries things a little too far. Easygoing and independent, these
two are
compatible when it comes to balancing personal interests. They've never
known
jealousy, and each partner keeps busy with personal projects when not with
their
lover. When they are together, however, they do all they can toward pleasing
their partner and satiating common interests.  Although they are adaptable
and
modern, they can, at times, fly off the handle. However, it is not in the
Archer's
nature to hold a grudge or let disagreements fester very long.

Sagittarius is ruled by the Planet Jupiter (Luck). Expansion is the key word
here;
as both partners enjoy the acquisition of knowledge, they will carry over
exciting
ideas into their relationship. They must be mindful of over-indulgences, as
such
gluttony will only distract them. Their charm and charisma make them a very
pleasant couple not only to one another, but the entire crowd.


Tetco held a 637 "settlement" conference last Fiday to discuss their latest
proposal dated March 8th.  Their new proposal involved the institution of a
weekly cash-out mechanism along with a daily variance penalty based on
overall system position.

In brief:
PENALTIES
Stage One--on any day where a shipper's imbalance in greater than 7% in any
zone, the "daily imbalance charge" would be 2x the maximum PAL rate for the
entire balance (not just the piece that's over 7%) in each zone.
Stage Two--on any day where either the Market Area or Access Area is out of
balance by greater than 4%, Tetco would have the discretion to issue a Stage
Two notice, establishing a tolerance level (which could be 0, subject to
Tetco's sole discretion) that all shippers would have not less than 12 hours'
notice with which to comply.  Under Tetco's propsal, any volumes in excess of
the level stated in the notice would be assessed a "daily imbalnce charge"
equal to 4x the maximum PAL rate.
In a Stage 2 situation, if your imbalance is in the opposite direction of the
pipe, no penalty would be charged (but you'd still cash-out)

CASH-OUT
Weekly monetization of cash-out positions based on a Sunday to Saturday week
(Tetco needs to revise this so that the weeks are managed depending on how
the calendar falls so that they minimize problems like a 2-day week).
Monetization by Zone in 2 tiers
 0-4% to be cashed-out at the average of each day's mid point price for the
weekly period
 4%+ ENTIRE IMBALANCE cashed-out at the weekly highest/lowest common price
for the week
This is a significant change since under the current tariff, shippers pay a
staggered fee, such that volumes with in the first tier are charged that
tier's price, then overflow into the next tier is charged at that tier's
price, etc.  Now, the entire amount would be assessed the higher price.

NETTING & TRADING
would be limited to the week in which the imbalance was incurred and would be
limited by zone (contrary to Order 637)
Any netting or trading would not decrease the daily imbalance charge (the
positions would be frozen each day) but could decrease the cash-out exposure
(completely contrary to 637 which indicates that netting & trading should be
a tool used to limit penalties)

Results:
it would be possible, in fact likely, that a shipper would pay both an
imbalance penalty and a cash-out fee on the same volume (contrary to Order
637)
under the Zero tolerance Stage Two scenario, Tetco would have complete
discretion to set the level (not itself a bad thing, they need to be able to
control their system)--they've indicated that they'd set a 2% floor for
penalties but that doesn't really solve the problem.
not only would the cash-out mechanism be more difficult to administer, it
could significantly increase our cash-out liability and subject us to
penalties that do not exist today.

Dynegy, PGC and Indicated Shippers indicated to Tetco that we don't see any
progress towards settlement, or even a foundation to go forward on and that
we're ready at this point to go to the Commission for a decision on their 637
filing as a whole.  Several of the LDC's stated that they want to continue to
pursue settlement so we agreed to submit a status report to Staff indicating
that we'll continue to talk, setting an April 30th deadline.  At that point,
I expected that Tetco would attempt to establish an aggressive negotiation
schedule in an effort to make some progress--instead all they did was agree
to my request to provide a comparison of the different offers and scheduled a
follow up meeting for April 10th.

Tetco indicated that they don't plan to make another offer and would not
agree to entertain counter-offers.  At this point, I doubt that we'll make
any significant progress and believe that this issue will end up being
litigated, or at least submitted to  the FERC for a decision.  Based strictly
on the letter of the Order (or at least our interpretation of it), I think we
have

Please let me know if you have any questions / concerns / comments.

Thanks,
Suzanne
x54880


I left a phone message w/ Western  they have not responded.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Steve, thanks for the helpful materials. However, if the experience in
overseas deregulating electricity markets where price increases and spikes
have occurred is any precedent, we will need to have some more down-to-earth
responses to a some of the potentially inflammatory issues facing the
politicians:
    1. When the prices spike, who reaps the windfall? Who sells that most
expensive 1% of the kwh? Is it a careful planner or a lucky speculator or
market manipulator? Someone is making a bunch of money off the screwed up
system. Who is it, and why is that OK?
    2. We do not allow people to inflate water prices to consumers in times
of drought, or food prices in times of hurricanes or floods. Even gasoline
price increases in periods of high demand are within 20%-30% of the base, not
2,5,10 or 100 times the average like spot electric prices. The issue isn't
whether the system is broken or not or how bad partial regulation is or how
much demand has increased versus supply. Thes will be seen as "ivory tower"
discussions. The populist political issue is, until the problem is fixed, why
should some shrewd big electric company or middleman be allowed to profit off
the misfortune of consumers who did not cause the problem? Why should anyone
be allowed to profiteer by selling at multiples above their generation cost?
    3. The hedges, fixed price contracts and other de facto insurance against
volatility that Enron or others offer could be seen as a symptom of the
problem rather than the solution.  Enron could be seen as at best a band aid
and at worst an opportunist made possible only by a broken system - - -sort
of like the guys who ran the old style protection rackets, or Colombian
"security consultants" who "guard " pipelines from the threats their guerilla
afiliates create, or  political risk insurance that you shouldn't really need
if the host country wasn't so screwed up. Don't worry about high crime in
your neighborhood -  - - just hire an off-duty policeman.   Who needed these
new electricity risk management products in the old days before deregulation?

    We have to be able to answer these types of questions at the level of the
ordinary citizen, not merely have the correct long-term competitive market
solution, or the forces of ignorance and re-regulation will gain momentum.
Are we sure we shouldn't back a temporary peak hour price cap  until the
regulatory problems we're all familiar with are worked out, to avoid a much
worse long term rollback?. - - -DLH

Steven J Kean@EES
08/14/2000 05:42 PM
Sent by: Maureen McVicker@EES
To: Executive Committee
cc: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joseph P
Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Jeannie Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicholas
O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Talking Points re "reregulation" in California

As I promised this morning at the executive committee meeting, below are some
talking points for your use.

Overall message:  the market is working, regulation is not.

In California, peak demand rose by 10% over the last 4 years while new
capacity grew by only 2%.  But, as you would expect, the market responded by
proposing 8,000MW of new generation - - more than enough to offset the peak
demand growth.  The regulatory process, at both the state and local level,
has failed to site this new generation.  The problem is regulation, not
deregulation.

When San Diego customers began experiencing the effects of higher prices,
Enron responded with a fixed price which would have shielded San Diego
customers from price volatility and provided prices below their current
summer levels (Enron's price was about $55/MWH).  After publication of
Enron's offer, nine other companies made offers.  Again, the market responded
where regulation failed.  San Diego has not accepted any of these offers
because of regulatory/legislative restrictions on its ability to buy outside
of the PX (i.e. the spot market).

In markets where siting is easier, suppliers have moved to build additional
generation.  Enron built 3 plants in response to the 1998 price spikes.
Those plants were planned, sited and built in less that 12 months - - in time
for the summer of 1999.  Where regulatory hurdles are lower, the market
responds.

The solution to current pricing and reliability issues is more competition
not reregulation.  Policy makers should:

Open the transmission grid so that power can get from where it is to where it
is needed.

Expedite interconnection of new generation.

Expedite siting of new facilities.

Give customers a choice, so that they have better access to demand side
solutions.

Also attached is a more detailed discussion of California, prepared by Jeff
Dasovich of our San Francisco office.


Somehow, I have lost your telephone no.    I was going to call you to get an
update---or do you have anything to tell me?


I have not been included in discussions of this transaction. FYI, to me, a prepayment for a service contract would generally be amortized over the life of the contract.

I do see that Bob was referenced in Dave's response.
Bob - comments?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:27 PM
To:	Waymire, Dave; Gilbert, Steve; Saunders, James
Cc:	Centilli, James; McCarty, Danny; Neubauer, Dave; Brassfield, Morris
Subject:	RE: Redfield Deliverability Project

I would appear to me that there may be some misconceptions here.     Why do we assume that by entering into a financing deal we will be any better off?  I would tell you that to the extent there was any risk in the deal, that we should probably charge someone else about 25-30% as well.     Think about it, 25% is only 15% after tax.   Has some one enumerated the risks and valued them on this deal?   I haven't seen any of that work, if it has been done.

I think I understand the concept proposed and I understand the proposed goal line, return with little or no expense up front.     I would assume that we would be willing to enter into a fixed price service agreement for a number of years?     Is Halliburton willing to take any risks whatsoever?

Alternatively, why don't we go through GSS (Global Strategic Sourcing) to look for a better deal?

Jim:   Have you looked at this for ideas on the accounting side?    Why can't I do a prepayment of a service contract fee and recognize the expense over the life of the deal?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Waymire, Dave
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:17 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Gilbert, Steve
Cc:	Centilli, James
Subject:	RE: Redfield Deliverability Project

Rod,

Below is some background on the Redfield Deliverability Project.

Halliburton initiated the contact with NNG to provide work over on selected wells based on software modeling in order to return deliverability to their original levels.  The work overs are planned over a 2-3 year period and are expected to have a lasting effect of at least 10 years.  The cost to model and rework these wells is estimated to be $5.73MM.  A test program would be conducted in the first year to determine the feasibility of continuing the program at a cost of $768,000.  If the test program did not prove out the project would be terminated at this point.  The original proposal was to treat the costs of the program as expense as the costs were incurred. Bob Chandler confirmed this accounting treatment.  This would result as Kent has indicated negative EBIT for the first 2-3 years.

As an alternative it was proposed to Halliburton that NNG would enter into a 10 year service agreement with Halliburton to model and rework the wells and provide guidance on proposed well work overs for the Redfield storage field.  Halliburton would agree to perform the test program and if test results indicate that further work overs would be economically feasible would spend an additional $4.96MM on a total of 60 well workovers in the first 3 years of the contract.  NNG currently budgets $300,000 per year for Redfield well maintenance with minimal increase in deliverability. Operations has committed $300,000 per year in well maintenance over the next 5 years to this project for a total of $1.5MM.

Halliburton has not formalized their counter offer, but has indicated that they would require a 25% to 30% return for assuming the financing.  Halliburton indicated that this is a non-standard deal for them and that is the reason for high return requirement.

The objective is to structure the deal as a service agreement either with an Enron Entity who would then contract with Halliburton or some other third party at a more reasonable rate.  Even at an estimated 30% return, preliminary incremental EBIT estimates for the Halliburton service agreement are between $400,000 to $500,000 the first 5 years and  $250,00 to $275,000 for the out years.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 7:05 AM
To:	Gilbert, Steve
Cc:	Waymire, Dave
Subject:	RE: Redfield Deliverability Project

Couple of quick comments.    Prepaying as an expense would require coming up with some income to offset, and generally doesn't make economic sense.   An Enron company can't help because it consolidates, and therefore ends up with the same accounting results as we do.       What accountants have reviewed the proposal?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Kent
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:52 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; McCarty, Danny
Cc:	Waymire, Dave; Neubauer, Dave; Neville, Sue; Thomas, Steve
Subject:	Redfield Deliverability Project

Rod,

We looking for your help on some ideas on how to implement a good long term project that has negative short term cash flow.

We have been working with Halliburton to identify deliverability improvements at Redfield through the use of  improved technology related to identifying poor performing wells and implementing down hole remediation.  This project has costs and revenues as shown below that are great from a long term standpoint.  Steve Thomas and Maurice Gilbert have done an excellent job of identifying the benefits to NNG and the upsides in revenue that are expected.  Dave Waymire has also been very helpful in analyzing alternative and economics and have shown that the project has a great return (in excess of 30%).  Our problem is that the cost for the workovers at Redfield are all O&M expenses and not capital and we have a negative IBIT for the first 2 - 3 years of the project.  We have proposed that Halliburton structure the expenses such that they come in over a 5 - 10 year period so we don't have this negative IBIT flow in the first years, however, Halliburton has not been interested and has proposed a 30% finance charge for this structure.

What would be the appetite for possibly pre-paying a majority of these costs in '01 to avoid the negative '02 and '03 earnings impact or is there an Enron company that would finance/extend the expense payments.  This is a great project that we should do, however, it is difficult given the negative earnings impacts in the first couple of years.  Got any ideas to handle this financial hurdle??????

Year		Expense		Revenue		Net
'01		   ($173,000)		     -0-			  ($173,000)
'02		($2,420,000)		   $300,000		($2,120,000)
'03		($2,250,000)		$1,290,000		   ($960,000)
'04 and		       -0-			$2,055,000/yr		 $2,055,000/yr
forward

Thanks,

Kent


This is Dynegy's first draft of a top 10 wishlist to give to the head of the
Common Carrier Burueau at the FCC.  She specifically requested that the list
be limited to win-win proposals.  Let's plan to discuss on the 11:00 call.

Sue Nord, Sr. Director
Government Affairs
713 345-4196

----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 06/18/2001 08:15 AM -----

	Ed.A.Ross@dynegy.com
	06/15/2001 05:09 PM

		 To: ghinners@reliant.com, shermanc@kochind.com, ccampbell@reliant.com,
dzake@reliant.com, whoefling@reliant.com, jminnis@reliant.com,
jblackwell@reliantenergy.com, sam.beason@elpaso.com, chris.noon@elpaso.com,
ed.ross@dynegy.com, sue.nord@enron.com, ajenkins-lara@reliant.com,
walker.fleming@dynegy.com, ccoker@reliant.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: first draft of FCC top ten list

Attached is my first draft of comments - top ten list of needs to promote
bandwidth trading.  THis has not benn circulated around DYN yet, so there's
nothing official about it yet.  Please look over and let me know your
thoughts.  Steve Augustino provided some of the bullets.  Have a great
weekend.

(See attached file: FCC white paper for BW trading 061201.doc)

Ed Ross
Sr. Director and Regulatory Counsel
713.767.8428
ed.ross@dynegy.com

 - FCC white paper for BW trading 061201.doc


looks good to me
---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 07/17/2000
02:23 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey T Hodge
07/14/2000 03:37 PM
To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Force Majeure Consideration

Hunter:

It is ENA's standard language which includes language relating to being able
to overcome commercially, etc.  What my approach would do is override any
different language in any master including GISB.

Jeff

	Hunter S Shively
	07/14/2000 02:43 PM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Force Majeure Consideration

what are the force majeure terms in the ECT GTC?

Hunter


***REMINDER***

We have not yet received your feedback.  Your input is
very valuable and to be included in the participant's
summary report, it must be received NO LATER THAN CLOSE
OF BUSINESS on Tuesday, May 1, 2001.  Without your
feedback, the participant may not receive a summary
report or be eligible to attend the program.

___________________________________________
* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *
Executive Impact & Influence Program

Dear Scott Neal,

As part of the Executive Impact and Influence Program,
each participant is asked to gather input on the
participant's own management styles and practices as
experienced by their immediate manager, each direct
report, and up to eight colleagues/peers.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a
participant attending the next program.  Your input
(i.e., a Self assessment, if you are a participant in
this program, Manager assessment, Direct Report
assessment, or Colleague/Peer assessment) will be
combined with the input of others and used by the
program participant to develop an action plan to
improve his/her management styles and practices.  If
you are providing feedback as a Manager of the
participant, please note that your feedback will be
identified in the summary report.

It is important that you complete this assessment NO
LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS on Tuesday, May 1, 2001.

To begin the online administration process, you will
need the following Internet address and Password(s).
NOTE:  If you are providing feedback for more than one
person, each password and participant name is
individually listed below.

Open your Internet browser e.g., Internet Explorer or
Netscape Navigator, and please type or copy the URL
address below into your Internet browser (please DO NOT
go through Lotus Notes):

www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

D99UHK    (Mark Breese)

If you experience technical problems, please call
Dennis Ward at FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you
have any questions about this process, you may contact
Debbie Nowak at Enron, 713-853-3304, or Christi Smith at
Leadership Research Institute/Keilty, Goldsmith & Company,
619-216-0404.

Thank you for your participation.


Helen-

Just checking on whether there will be a lesson time available on Sunday
afternoon.  Saturday late afternoon might work for us as well.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira  (Kali Pereira)


Rahil:
I have never commented favorably nor unfavorably about Kase's newsletter.   I
think publishing independent market evaluations could be beneficial.  The
more interesting content that is published, the better.

From:  Rahil Jafry
 08/28/2000 07:48 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline

Hey John,

We'd briefly spoken on the phone last week, but I haven't been able to come
by and talk to you like I'd promised.  Louise had mentioned you did not like
Cynthia Kase's newsletter and may not want us to put Cynthia's weekly
summaries on EnronOnline.

Since Fred (Lagrasta) and his group think publishing her summaries on
EnronOnline will attract more of the smaller customers, would you have any
objection over us publishing the Kase newsletters.

Pls. let me know ASAP so we can proceed with this further.

Regds.,
Rahil
x. 3-3206


Can we meet on Friday and review this spreadsheet?

Hunter


If you need me I'm in the cafeteria for 5 minutes
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


this is from my old girlfriend that i hooked up with over break...  i think i should call, eh?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mgiattina@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:40 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	portland...

Hey Cooper,
  Well, I don't know if you remember, but I'm heading out to Portland for an interview.  Prob little to no chance I'll end up there, but what the hell, I've never been and it can't hurt to visit.  I remember you saying that you knew Brinda's email.  Do you think you could send it to me?  I'll be there the 14th.

Otherwise, don't really know what to say.  I'm pretty much still reeling from what happened.  I meant it when I said that nothing like this has happened in the last 8 years.  Unfortunately, my future with Steve is looking a little rocky right now, but I still don't know what my motivation was (drunkenness never an excuse...) and I've been pretty upset.  I haven't seen Steve yet, and to be honest I don't think now is the time to bring this sort of thing up to him.  I decide where I will move in feb, and I think it's best if steve and I go our own ways amicably, without this mess (yes, feeble excuse).

Anyway, don't mean to bring up all this crap, b/c it's not yours, but we've been friends for a long time and I respect you and like you, and I really don't want you to think that this is a frequent occurence.  I do wish I was a little more sober, not b/c it would've changed much, but I think it might've been better all around.

So, any advice on Portland or SF would be appreciated (one night in each).  Call 646 342 3507 or email.

Later,
Mara


Kim:  Read this over and give me a call.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2001
06:05 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  CoganJA@aol.com                           03/29/2001 11:49 PM

To: sbreen@czn.com, cfoster@enron.com
cc:
Subject: PPL Proposal

Gentlemen,

I tried to reach both of you late in the evening, but was unsuccessful.  I
will be traveling starting at 7 am Las Vegas time back to NO.  I have a brief
layover in Phoenix and will try to contact you.

Initial reaction to our proposal during the day was that it looked pretty
good.  This I got from Terry Crupi.  At that time Terry had not seen the
proposal, but was relaying what he had gotten from Barbara Veety back in
Allentown. In the early evening I met with John Baileys, Terry Crupi, and Joe
Cammarano of PPL.  At that meeting they expressed concern for the reservation
charge and floor, especially since the Citizens' TW contract has no
alternative market.  I asked if a cap would help ease their concerns and they
said that they did not think so.  They are really struggling with the
reservation charge as we have currently proposed it.  They agree that we
should at a minimum recover all of our fixed pipeline fees in a reservation
charge.  We did not have a chance to get into discussions about other
potential cost that would be appropriately placed in the reservation charge.

They would prefer a pure index based deal and could agree to a load factor of
about 80%, but indicated that they could live with some monthly reservation
fee based upon the monthly index, but we did not get into much detail on
exactly how that would work.

Perhaps the biggest issue that came out of this meeting is that they do not
believe that the SoCal Border is the appropriate index.  They believe that
the PG&E City Gate is more reflective of what the market price is.  They
claim that the SoCal point reflects the El Paso cuts.

In a passing comment John Baileys indicated that they have gotten a number of
 proposals that are attractive on both El Paso and TW.

John Baileys wants to do something with Citizens and is interested in a term
that would go for a least 2 years.  I ask if going through September 03 had
appeal and he responded affirmatively.  He also said that a provision that
allowed for available capacity to move up or down would be acceptable.

PPL wants to keep this process on a fast track, as do we.

The next steps:

1) PPL will provide a counter proposal on Monday.

2) Chris, what insight can you provide on the index issue.  I do not have
much history on that point, but on Friday of last week PGE City Gate was
$9.08 while SoCal Border was $10.90.  What are the historical prices for PGE?
 What are the drivers for the price differences between PGE and SoCal?  Is
the PGE index mature?  I have not followed it.  Is it a more appropriate
index for TW?

Hopefully we can catch up in the morning from Phoenix.

John


I added Jeff's slide, and threw in some more color
while I was at it...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
 - E248_Presentation.ppt


Hey bro

What is happening?! Fishing stuff is coming along. The charter is set for
Sept. 22nd in the A.M. departing from point pleasant. Capt. Gene will get
back to me in a week or so with more details.

The cost is $50 per person. No bottles allowed but you can bring cans or
cups. I've got the beer and drinks. Also pack food. Trip should be about 8
hours.

Contacted Rich Moeller and let him know about the time and specifics. It
looks like 14 people are going with the possibility of about 20 (5 are still
undecided). Should be a good time.

If you have some e-mail addresses for Rich or Rosigliano or a couple of
other people please supply them to me so I can keep everyone posted on the
details.

The big date is less than 4 weeks away (Can you believe it?)

Hope all is well,

Keith
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


That job is with Bob Williams, the litigation attorney for our international
company.  Bob is a great guy, probably one of the funniest people I have ever
known.  It also might be a good job for you because he promoted his last
administrative assistant to paralegal.

	"Patti Young" <pyoung@pdq.net>
	09/20/2000 11:51 AM

		 To: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: An Update

Thanks for writing back.  I could probably do the Saturday evening thing.  I
will let you know soon.

If you get a chance, check out Job No. 105738.  Know anything about it??

----- Original Message -----
From: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: An Update

>
> I was just about to call you when I got your email.  Holly called and she
> has a table to fill at an awards banquet (some women's professional group
> or something) and wants to know if you want to join us.  A bunch of her
> girlfriends are going, me, Lucinda, I think Carol....anyway, it's Saturday
> night at 7:00 pm.  She said it should be really boring (so I put it on my
> calendar as "boring awards banquet"), but with all the girls at one table
> we'll misbehave and have fun.  I hope you can join us.  Let me know and
> I'll reserve you a spot w/Holly.
>
> The thing on your house and townhome sounds exciting.  When can I see it?!
>
>
>
>                     "Patti Young"
>                     <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     "Tana Jones"
<Tana.Jones@enron.com>
>                     et>                  cc:
>                                          Subject:     Re: An Update
>                     09/18/2000
>                     05:44 PM
>
>

>
>
>
>
> The name of the plant I told you about last week is DURANTA.
>
> Think you will want it??
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tana Jones <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
> To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 8:28 AM
> Subject: An Update
>
>
> >
> >
> > That job I passed on your resume to in our group, I checked, and they
> still
> > haven't started interviewing people yet, since Barbara is on vacation
> dropping
> > her daughter off at college.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


I completely forgot to ask you what the mood is like in Houston after everything that has happened. How did you meeting with Sally go? Any gossip? C'mon, you gatta have something.

John Postlethwaite
EPMI-West Power Risk Management
503-464-7756


"Can do what's necessary on word and excel to scrape by. Sucks at
powerpoint.....do you have a graphics department like Enron so I won't have
to fiddle with presentations?"


Just a reminder that I go on Tuesday, Jan. 16, and hopefully, return on Jan.
16.  SS

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


I tried to figure out how to print the whole thing, but failed.  Did she
figure out how to print the entire document?  It really has a lot of
information on it.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/17/2000 03:17:14 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: RE: LM6000 Contract Payment Allocations

Thanks for the update.  Sorry for the confusion over the turbine numbers
and delivery dates.  The spreadsheet my secretary printed out only had
the amounts due, but I see that when I open it on the screen, I can see
the turbines, due dates, etc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 3:58 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.; Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com
Cc: Pipitone, Paul; Cobb, Chris; Taylor, Rob; mmckay@velaw.com
Subject: RE: LM6000 Contract Payment Allocations

I just spoke with GE's counsel, and here's where we are:

Change the following for the final draft:
1.80  delete "remaining"
10.2.1  take out the note

Otherwise, GE had no comments.

Peter/Chris,

If you look on the spreadsheet I sent you earlier, it gives the unit
numbers for each of the projects.  You can figure out the guaranteed
delivery dates by matching up the delivery dates from the contracts with
the number.  Also, please fix the use of purchase amount in 10.10.6 as
suggested by Dale.

The ESA deal has a change order associated with it (change order 3,
attached below) and that CO is not reflected in the amounts to be paid.

(See attached file: Change Order #3.doc)

City of Austin has no change orders.  The assignee is Enron South
America.

Thanks,

Kay


Jeff:

CERA just informed me that as a CERA member, we will receive one copy of this report.  He will forward me a copy in the next day or so.  I know you are interested in it, and will get you a copy as soon as I receive it.

Jennifer


Remove all references to EnronOnline its unnecessary in this context -
suffice to say you will be trading through all the normal Enron methods.

Louise

Bryan Seyfried
16/02/2000 20:24
To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Dilworth/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Goddard/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: letter to reference credits

Attached is the letter that we intend to send to CFO/Treasurers of reference
credits.  The section on EnronOnline was recommended by Sullivan and Cromwell
and reviewed by Goddard, Dilworth and Simons.

There may be a few minor edits before it goes out.

Thanks

bs


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 08:27 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           10/31/2000 08:25 AM

To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fantast Basketball DRAFT TODAY @ 10:30

Tell me if you are in on the draft at 10:30.  To draft you need to go to the
website and click on draft - go to the draft room.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 08:23 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           10/31/2000 08:21 AM

To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fantast Basketball DRAFT TODAY @ 10:30

Just as clarification - we start 6 players and have weekly scoring in haed to
head matchups.  You can chage your lineup before each day's worth of action.
Your sixth man can be any position.  The draft order will be determind at
10:30.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 08:19 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           10/31/2000 08:01 AM

To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Fantast Basketball DRAFT TODAY @ 10:30

Since the NBA season begins tonight, we need to have the fantasy basketball
draft today @ 10:30 AM. Tell me if this is ok.  If you do not remember the
rules, go to the link below and scroll down to the bottom of the page to the
rules link.

The Academy will roll once again!

And by the way plove, it is last day for everyone.  You can take 1 minute out
of every half hour today to make a pick.  Everyone else has agreed.  Besides
it won't be as much fun without my whipping boy again.

basketball.commissioner.com/efba

I never heard anything back from Walker's Westies so The Rounders are taking
his spot.

-Eric


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001
10:10 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Darron C Giron                           02/23/2001 05:27 PM

To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Schedule C

Chris,
We are taking $100M to Schedule C tonight.  I don't know when it may be
released.

DG


Clement:
Thanks for your quick response.  As for me, I've got about 3 weeks to go and
after this week, pretty much anything goes.  I feel great and am really
excited and anxious.  In the meantime, I'm using my pregnancy as an excuse to
get our counterparties to finalize our ISDA's and it appears to be working!
Thanks for asking.
Carol

	Clement Abrams@ENRON
	06/26/2000 01:38 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Guaranty Issue

I'm okay with the language.  How are you doing?

Clem

	Carol St Clair@ECT
	06/22/2000 05:43 PM

		 To: Clement Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Guaranty Issue

Clement:
We are trying to finalize our ISDA with Deutsche Bank.  In the Guaranty where
we have the setoff and counterclaim language they want to add a proviso that
basically states that Enron Corp. would be entitled to get the benefit of the
rights, setoffs, counterclaims and other defenses that ENA is entitled to
only to the extent taht it would have had the benefit of those rights if it
were the direct counterparty.  I think that I am okay with this but wanted
your input.  Let me know what you think.  Thanks.
carol


Hi Kate
This deal has 0 volume.  Is it correct?  if so, do we need to confirm it?
Thanks!
Kim


FYI:  EGM has established a fundamentals group that is providing information
on the intranet relating to coal
  and crude markets.

Regards,

Chris Calger

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           01/09/2001 04:17 PM

To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EGM Fundamentals Sites

Here is the info on the EGM sites. IF we can be of any assitance to the
Western team let me know.

Links to the sites are as follows:

Coal - http://egmfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/coal/framework/default.asp

Crude - http://egmfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/crude/framework/default.asp

flash intro - http://egmfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/   *Please note that the
links from this intro are temporarily unavailable so you should use one of
the above links to access the site of your choice.  Feel free to check out to
see the direction we're moving  in  as far as look and feel goes.

Thanks for passing them onto to your team

Jen
34759


Re: Commodity Futures Trading Commission: Final Rulemaking for a New
Regulatory Framework for Multilaeral Transaction Execution Facilities,
Intermediaries and Clearing Organizations

                     Attached is a memorandum from Sullivan & Cromwell
concerning the above subject. A summary is also included at the end of
the text of this e-mail message.

                    The attached file is in Adobe Acrobat
format.  We believe most PCs will already have an Acrobat viewer
loaded; we can provide free copies if Acrobat is not already loaded,
and free copies can also be downloaded from the Adobe Acrobat web
site at www.adobe.com.  To view or print the memo use your e-mail
system's function for opening attachments in their native format.
Hard copies can be obtained from Ivy Moreno at S&C in New York,
telephone 212-558-3448, e-mail: Morenoi@sullcrom.com.

SUMMARY

                      On November 22, 2000, the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission ("CTFC")approved four releases setting out final rules for
regulatory reform (the "Final Rules").  The Final Rules largely follow
the proposed rules issued by the Commission on June 8, 2000.*
The Final Rules are to be effective 60 days after their publication in
the Federal Register.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - CMS10713.pdf


---------------------- Forwarded by Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT on 12/26/2000
02:26 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Nicole Vo @ ENRON                           12/08/2000 11:28 AM

To: Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: MGI Supply
Humble Gas Pipeline
S#446339, 449505, 411836, 472615, 463236, 448454

Elsa,

I was informed to bill anything on HGPL by my supervisor, but when I talk to
Priscilla Hamic she informed me that HGPL should be billed by offsystem and
not the Texas desk.  The deals in Sitara that relate to HGPL all state that
it is Texas desk.

Please let me know who should be billing MGI Supply for HGPL volume.

Thanks for your help.
Nicole Vo


Please ignore the previous memo.  I had a wrong date in it.  Thanks. Lynn

The following is the procedure Gas Logistics and Marketing have agreed to beginning this weekend to
segregate the TW and NNG morning meeting.

1.  TW will have their morning meeting in EB1336 Mondy through Friday at 8:00 a.m. beginning, Monday, January 21, 2002. TW schedulers will attend this meeting.
2.  Gas Logistics will be sure either Steve January, Darrell Schoolcraft or Gary Spraggins is in attendance for Gas Control and either Lynn Blair, Terry Kowalke or John Buchanan is in attendance for scheduling discussions.
3.  On Fridays at 3:00 p.m., beginning Friday, January 18 , 2002, there will be a meeting in EB1336 to review any TW issues for the weekend.  Marketing and Gas Logistics will be in attendance.
4.  Beginning this weekend, Saturday, January 12, 2002,  on Saturday and Sunday, if there are any TW issues that need to be discuss, Gas Logistics will call the appropriate Marketing On Call person after the NNG 8:00 morning meeting.
5.  NNG will continue to have their Marketing/Gas Logistics morning meeting in EB42C2 Monday through Friday and the Conference call at 8:00 a.m. on Satruday and Sunday.
6.  The TW Schedulers will attend the meeting at EB1336 Monday through Friday.  On Saturday and Sunday, they will be in the NNG morning meeting conference call and stay on the line for the TW meeting if it is necessary to have one.  We are continuing to include the TW schedulers on the conference call due to discussions about system issues which impact both pipelines.

If anyone has any questions, or would like to discuss any changes, please let Kim Watson or I know and we can certainly look at other options.

I apologize this did not get started this last Friday, but I believe everyone has it on their calendars now.

Thanks for everyones help and support to come up with a solution that hopefully works for all.

Lynn


going out this weekend?  golf maybe tomorrow.


thanks for the offer, but i can not get out
would y'all want to play on the weekend to brush up ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"ricardo mihaly" <siva66@msn.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22ricardo+20mihaly+22+20+3Csiva66+40msn+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:59 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	golf

you want to play some free golf?  ernie, richard and myself will be playing at meadowbrook farms on this coming monday at 10:00 am.  so if you can get out there we'd love you to come. hey, you can't beat free golf.

let me know,

ricardo

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com << File: http://explorer.msn.com >>


> The attached memo summarizes the status of the HPL transaction.
> Please call me with any questions.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
>  <<Status010515.doc>>
 - Status010515.doc


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                      Wednesday, November 8, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185957
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: Credit Suisse First Boston
 CSFB and DLJ are now one. #1 in M&A deals. #1 in IPO volume.
 #1 in high-yield debt underwriting. The best part? That"s
 just the beginning.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=185958

"Words are the most powerful drug used by mankind." -- Rudyard
Kipling

HUMAN GENOME'S Q3
Biotech company Human Genome Sciences announced a cash-rich Q3
yesterday.

By LouAnn Lofton

Rule Breaking biotechnology company Human Genome Sciences
(Nasdaq: HGSI) reported third-quarter (ended September 30)
earnings yesterday after the market's close. Revenues climbed
for the drug development company, while losses widened.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185959

Human Genome's third-quarter revenues increased to $8.1 million,
compared to $7.4 million in last year's third quarter. Included
in this amount is a licensing fee the company received from
MedImmune (Nadaq: MEDI), related to a SmithKline Beecham (NYSE:
SBH) vaccine development deal.

The company lost $147 million in the quarter, including a
onetime write-off related to the $134.1 million acquisition of
Principia Pharmaceutical. Excluding this charge, Human Genome
lost $13 million, or $0.12 a share. In the year-ago period, it
lost $9.7 million, or $0.11 per share. Analysts as polled by
First Call/Thompson Financial had expected Human Genome to lose
$0.13 a share, excluding charges, so the company beat that by a
penny.

Human Genome Sciences had $849.5 million in cash and short-term
investments as of the close of the quarter. This compares to the
$466.2 million it had in cash and short-term investments at the
end of December 1999.

After the end of the third quarter, the company sold more stock
to the public and raised an additional $950 million in cash.
Counting that amount, Human Genome's current amount of cash and
short-term investments is about $1.8 billion. The company now
has about 124.8 million shares of outstanding common stock,
compared to 112.1 million at the close of the third quarter.

William A. Haseltine, Human Genome's chairman and chief
executive officer, said in a statement, "We are pleased that our
recent efforts have brought several HGS drugs closer to the
patients who need them. At the same time, we focused on enabling
scientists at HGS and our partners to discover and develop
additional drugs that may aid more patients to lead healthier,
more active lives."
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

Online auction house eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY) is cutting some of its
offline workers. About 15% of the employees at the eBay-owned
Butterfields fine-art auction company will be losing their jobs.
That equals about 32 people. eBay cut 13 jobs at the Chicago
Butterfields office back in July. eBay spokesman Kevin Pursglove
said, "The management team at Butterfields came to the
conclusion that they will continue to move the business to the
online area."

Good-bye, MotherNature.com (Nasdaq: MTHR). Just after we lost
Pets.com (Nasdaq: IPET) and that annoyingly cute little sock
puppet, MotherNature.com announced that it, too, is shutting its
doors. MotherNature.com is the second venture backed by CMGI
(Nasdaq: CMGI) to go belly-up this week. The other, online
furniture retailer Furniture.com, announced that it's closing on
Monday. MotherNature.com spent time looking for a buyer for its
online vitamins and health products business, but could find no
takers. The company's board of directors approved a plan to
liquidate and dissolve the company on Tuesday.

Preppy-chic designer and retailer Polo Ralph Lauren (NYSE: RL)
announced second-quarter results this morning. The company's
sales grew by 8% to $586.2 million, compared to $543.9 million
last year. Net income, before restructuring and other special
charges, was $48.8 million, versus $55.3 million in the year-ago
period. Earnings per diluted share on this basis were $0.50,
down from last year's $0.56. The company said the reduction in
net income and earnings per share was expected because of a
delay in recognizing some European sales results, as well as a
shift with the timing of some of its shipments.

AOL Latin America (Nasdaq: AOLA) reported first-quarter results
yesterday. The Internet services provider, which is a joint
venture between America Online (NYSE: AOL) and the Cisneros
Group of Companies, lost $0.36 a share, or $98.1 million.
Analysts had expected a loss of $0.37 a share. Revenues in the
quarter were $4.6 million. AOL Latin America said it added
191,000 users in the quarter, bringing its total number of
members to 314,000.

Check out all of yesterday's market Foolishness with a single
click.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185960
_________________________________________________________________

EDITORS' PICK

The Fool editorial staff selects seven must-read investing
classics. How many have you read?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185961
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185962

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185963

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185964

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185965

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185966
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185967
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185968
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185969
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185970
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185971

 Sponsored By: Credit Suisse First Boston
 CSFB and DLJ are now one. #1 in M&A deals. #1 in IPO volume.
 #1 in high-yield debt underwriting. The best part? That"s
 just the beginning.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=185972

FREE BOOK, JUST FOR FOOLS!
 Investor's Business Daily will send you a free copy
 of 24 Essential Lessons for Investment Success when
 you sign up for a free trial subscription of their newspaper.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=185973

NEW! EMC THIRD-QUARTER UPDATE
 The company continues to see incredible growth.
 Find out what lies ahead with Motley Fool Research.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=185974

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=185975
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId:
msg-14441-2000-11-08_9-00-48-3244856_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:05:03(11-08
-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


*31455

Wilson Kriegel@ENRON
05/03/2000 05:50 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: The Park

give me your phone number in the bulding?


damn . . .
are you going to take that

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001 11:35 AM
---------------------------

BRIAN HOSKINS@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
02/12/2001 11:15 AM
To: Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON
cc: Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES@ENRON, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES@ENRON, Eric
Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES@ENRON, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT@EES@ENRON
Subject: disgrace of the SEC

Big talk for a guy whose school is on NCAA probation as we speak.

http://www.ncaa.org/databases/db1/probation.html

By the way, I see from the latest RPIs that LSU is really pulling their
weight as the lowest-ranked team in the SEC, right behind Austin Peay.  But
hey, at least you're still ahead of Iona and Bradley.

	Timothy Blanchard@EES
	02/12/01 10:14 AM

		 To: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad
Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Class in Bluegrass

Excerpt from an article on espn.com

Given Kentucky's decades-long legacy of cheating in both basketball and
football,
                  ousting Mumme was a mandatory move. The school's image is
too fragile to
                  countenance keeping a coach with major violations on his
watch.

Enough said.


In response to your email re:  Richardson Products II, this counterparty was
approved for trading (without a master then in place) under my initial list
of approved counterparties.  Per the email below, we then received in the
signed master and the distribution was notified.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/30/99 05:11 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           11/04/99 11:28 AM

To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: My comments to latest counterparty list

Below are my comments to the Legal/Financial transactions only on the latest
counterparty list:

1.  CMS Marketing, Services & Trading Co.- no Column L, cannot do basis
transactions, that is floating, weather trades should all be approved, Column
CF should be out, basis is floating, fixed price transactions only
2.  Elf Trading S.A.-should be approved for weather, why no weather?
3.  Lehman Brothers Commercial Corp.-weather should not be approved
4.  Power Authority of the State of New York-seems to be missing from list.
What happened?
5.  Richardson Products II, Ltd.-please note, we just got in the signed ISDA
Master Agreement this week
6.  UBS AG - approved for interest rate and currency only-should be
restricted for all other products
7.  Abitibi Consolidated-please note, we got the signed ISDA Master Agreement
in this week
8.  Cross Timbers Energy Services-missed no weather
9.  EIL Petroleum-missed no weather
10.  Trafigura AG - Column DZ, US weather CDD swap is ok, Column EB, HDD
weather swap is ok
11.  Emerson Electric Co. - switching to approved for all products, it is not
a utility.

Per my conversations with Bob Shults, I have been and am continuing to review
our list of utilities with Sara Shackleton, outside counsel and the
regulatory people.  I don't know when I will get you a revised list, but I
hope to open a bunch of the investor owned utilities for general trading.


Iain:

We went and looked at the Toshiba copier on the 32nd floor and while it
does not appear to be extremely fast, I believe it will work for the 19th
floor.  I spoke with Vince Kaminski and he agreed with our getting this
copier.

We noticed this copier has a button that says "Network connection"
and were wondering it this copier could be hooked up to the network and
we could run copies from our computer?  Please let us know.

Thanks for all your help and have a wonderful Christmas and New
Year!

Shirley
Co# 0011
RC# 100038

Copier Information Including Pictures & Weblinks
From: Iain Russell on 12/17/99 10:47 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Copier Information for 55, 60 & 65 CPM Digital Machines

Shirley ,

Following up on the telephone conversation, please see the attached
spreadsheet for pricing information PLUS important information about "True
World" copy speeds.

Pricing was centered on the 42.315K per month volume band so that you can get
a good feel for copier expenditure based on average month volumes. I have
left the spreadsheet "unprotected" so that you can play with the volume
figures and see how this changes the price overall + how the "Cost Per Image"
is affected by volume changes.

? Pricing Spreadsheet: Under "NOTES" towards under the pictures.

The "True World" copy speed information has been supplied by Buyers Lab
Incorporated, which is an independent testing house that rates office
equipment, including copiers and publishes their findings on a quarterly
basis. Unfortunately they have not released their findings on the Canon IR550
as testing is not yet complete.

? Copier Speeds: @ the end of the Notes-Mail
{These include 1-1, 1-2 and duplexing + detail on completion of "sets"}

As you will see, duplexing speeds are widely different across the various
manufacturers equipment & the "True World" copy speeds are a soft $ expense
which impacts the true cost of running a copier.

**********************************************

Listed below are the URL's for the different 55, 60 & 65 CPM B/W copiers.

A) Overview
B) Specifications

**********************************************
FROM LANIER
Ricoh Equipment
55 copies per minute

A) & B) WEBLINK for machine Specifications -->Click here--->
http://www.lanier.com/ps/copiers/5255.html

*******************************************
65 copies per minute

A) & B) WEBLINK for machine Specifications -->Click here--->
http://www.lanier.com/ps/copiers/5265.html

**********************************************

FROM DANKA
Canon Equipment {IR550}
55 copies per minute

LOOKS LIKE:--->

WEBLINK for machine Specifications -->Click below:
A) http://www.usa.canon.com/corpoffice/netofficesys/ir550/ir550fea.html
B) http://www.usa.canon.com/corpoffice/netofficesys/ir550/ir550spec.html

******************************************************************************

Canon Equipment {IR600} >>Currently on 45 day backorder<<
60 copies per minute

LOOKS LIKE:--->

WEBLINK for machine Specifications -->Click below:
A) http://www.usa.canon.com/corpoffice/netofficesys/ir600/ir600fea.html
B) http://www.usa.canon.com/corpoffice/netofficesys/ir600/ir600spec.html

******************************************************************************
Toshiba Equipment
55 copies per minute

WEBLINK for machine Specifications -->Click below:
A) http://www.toshiba.com/taiseid/copiers/5570/features.htm
B) http://www.toshiba.com/taiseid/copiers/5570/spec.htm

*******************************************
65 copies per minute

WEBLINK for machine Specifications -->Click here -->
A) http://www.toshiba.com/taiseid/copiers/6570/features.htm
B) http://www.toshiba.com/taiseid/copiers/6570/spec.htm

**********************************************

Notes

Here is the PRICING SPREADSHEET for your records: -->

The highlighted rows on the spreadsheet reflect you current average monthly
volume.

FYI --> Target CPI or Cost Per Image is in the region $0.017 up to and
including $0.023.

Copier Model Monthly Volume Capacities
Model        Manufacturer Max Rec/Level  Realistic Level {Up to}
Toshiba 5570     340K        115K
Toshiba 6570     400K        135K
Lanier 5255 {Per Rep.}   200K                       100K
Lanier 5265 {Per Rep.}   200K                       100K
Canon IR550    200K          100K
Canon IR600    250K          100K

FYI: We currently have a Toshiba 6570 @ EB32K1 that is averaging 69,332
images per month with the top month producing 86,673 images and a Toshiba
5570 @ EB3080 area that is averaging 39,309 per month. Both of these machines
are in the Enron North America Trading environment.

The copiers quoted are all "Digital".
Digital: Scan once print many = 99 copies of one sheet? 1 Scan!
Analog: Scan for every image made = 99 copies of 1 sheet? 99 Scans = Possible
noise issue.

Copier Speeds = Total print time
This comparison gives the speed @ which the document set is printed
{No Staple, No 3-hole punch}

>>>>> 60 & 65 Copy per Minute machines <<<<<

**********************************************
>>>>> 55 Copy per Minute machines <<<<<

**********************************************
Please call me with any questions.

Thanks,                Iain Russell @ 713-853-6861
Contracts Supervisor Administration
Enron Property & Services Corp.

*****************************_Confidentiality_*****************************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message, and
notify us immediately. If you or your employer does not consent to Internet
email messages of this kind, please advise us immediately. Opinions,
conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given
or endorsed by my department or employer unless otherwise indicated by an
authorized representative independent of this message.

***************************************************************************


I'm here.  My phone's not working(no signal in the woods), but I'll call you
when I go to Ruston tomorrow afternoon.  Have a good weekend.

Robin


Lloyd will


thank you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bhatia, Randy
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:54 AM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	RE: netco files

kam,

i created a folder within Netco / West called "Summary P&L" and put the sum p&l and the phillip/mike email file in there.  fyi, neither report will work at the moment, as the macros are pointed to the old pnl's.  once the new pnl's are created, it won't be tough to get them running, just let me know.

thanks,
-rb

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:46 AM
To:	Worthing, Ashley; Pehlivanova, Biliana; Jones, Monte; Bhatia, Randy; O'Rourke, Ryan
Subject:	netco files

We are finalizing the list of files to be moved over to Netco today.  Please look in O:\erms\erms_adm\Netco\West and if there is a file you used to run, (price reports, the wood report, broker, desk to desk, consolidated P&L for the website, etc.) that you don't see out there now, please save a copy to this directory this morning.

Thanks

KK