I tried to call you back today, but was told that you had left the office.
Tried to leave you a voice mail message, but no one in the office knew how to
transfer my call into voice mail.  They were good about answering your phone,
however!

I will call you tomorrow morning before my first meeting at 8:30.  If I miss
you, I will ask my assistant to interrupt me when you call back.  I will be
in meetings with operations people from London and Sydney tomorrow, but can
easily step out to talk with you.


As a follow-up to our conversation in London when you said I should bring to
your attention any concerns I might have with financial trading issues, the
following has recently come up as an issue here in Houston (and does so from
time to time).   We will, in fact, be discussing it at our group meeting next
week.   I spoke to Edmund about it when I was there in London, but in light
of the recent Canadian form problems and the resulting concerns of Mark
Haedicke with the integrity of our forms, I thought I should bring this your
attention.

 One of our continuing concerns on the financial trading side is that every
financial trading lawyer/paralegal work from the centrally approved forms.
The Houston forms are currently located in a "read-only" directory.  We need
to be careful that users copy the forms out of the directory each time they
use the form.  Copying the form into a personal directory for ease of use
creates issues with people working from outdated base forms, or having forms
evolve without  approval.

Another way forms get changed without going through the approval process is
when an attorney tells the paralegals to make a change in every swap
agreement they approve.  It counts as a form change, not a negotiation
change, if you make it in every agreement.

Ultimately our goal is to centralize the forms in a database easily
accessible to all of us on a global basis (this is a central and critical
component of the Fishkin Project).

Thanks for your attention to this.


I have read this series of e:mails but I am not sure that I fully understand
the issue.  Did Willie not do his job?  Are there problems with how SAP
works?  Are both of these an issue?  Please let me know if we have a far
reaching problem with SAP and netting.  Thanks.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000 04:29 PM
---------------------------

	From:  William S Bradford                           09/22/2000 04:04 PM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Perry Gas -SAP Override issue

Sally,

Are you aware of the problems with SAP?  This error caused an incremental
$600,000 credit loss to Perry Gas Companies that could have been prevented.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Bill

---------------------- Forwarded by William S Bradford/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000
04:02 PM ---------------------------

From:  Russell Diamond
     09/22/2000 03:01 PM

To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Perry Gas -SAP Override issue

FYI-

---------------------- Forwarded by Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000
03:01 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Bryce Baxter                           09/22/2000 02:47 PM

To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Perry Gas -SAP Override issue

Russell - as I remember, Willie finaled the Supply Verification and it was
interfaced to SAP.  This is fine, and then Willie was going to net the A/P
and A/R.  SAP went down after the statement was interfaced, but before Willie
was able to block or net the payment.  When SAP came back up the next day,
the payment had already gone out and we were unable to recall the wire.  If
you have any further questions about this, call me.  Thanks.

From:  Russell Diamond
     09/22/2000 01:46 PM

To: Willie Stewart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Perry Gas -SAP Override issue

Willie,

Per our earlier conversation, can you or Audrey or Bryce, please give further
explain to me as to why the funds were wired to Perry Gas for purchases from
the counterparty instead on netting the amounts between purchases and sales.
You mentioned to me the process of overriding the counterparty's that net on
SAP, although because of timing, the override did not take place.

Thank you,

Russell


Kay,

What do you think?  Are we prohibited from doing this?

Stuart----- Forwarded by Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001 11:04 AM -----

	Eric Booth@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	02/02/2001 10:19 AM

		 To: Stuart Zisman@ECT, Billy Lemmons@ENRON, James I Ducote@ECT
		 cc: Jeffrey M Keenan@ECT
		 Subject: Austin - LM6000 Scope of supply

This past Wednesday during our weekly site visit, I explained to Austin
Energy that I could not give them the whole LM6000 contract for
confidentiality reasons, especially with respect to the commercial
sections.   They were okay with that, but did make one last (and polite)
request for a list of the scope items that they would be getting.  What I
would propose to send is Exhibit B and B-1 from the contract (see attached).
Exhibit B is a simple bulleted scope of supply list.  Exhibit B-1 is a simple
spec that we wrote for the turbine which is itself a glorified scope document.

Let me know if this is something that I can forward to Austin Energy.  If the
attached document still gives someone heartburn, I'll end it here and
politely decline with Austin Energy.

Thanks,
Eric


Maybe Wednesday, 12 Jan?

bs

To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: EnronCredit.com

Until we have determined a legal structure that works for this trading (e.g.
Chinese walls, public vs. private reference credits, etc.) I would encourage
caution in how far you go with specific names.  Once they are tainted, it may
not be possible to cleanse the situation sufficiently to trade on them for
some time.

When would you like to go to New York to meet with Sullivan & Cromwell?  Let
me know and I will set something up.

Mark

Bryan Seyfried
12/23/99 02:48 AM
To: EnronCredit.com
cc: Credit Trading
Subject: EnronCredit.com

As many of you already know, we have officially embarked on building a
commercial credit trading business based in Europe but globally focused with
trading operations in London and Houston.  We are focused on externally
launching the business by making two way prices on approximately 200 energy
credits in the US, Canada, UK and Nordic markets by 24 Jan. 2000 but we
expect to scale up the number of reference credits that we quote on very
quickly.  The initial names have been selected and provided to the credit
department in both locations for initial review and will be subsequently
distributed to the appropriate trading and origination groups for review
prior to going live.  The intent is to capture as much of the corporate
credit market as possible, as quickly as possible, by leveraging our internal
resources (people, processes and systems especially EnronOnline) and the new
mediums for communication.    To this extent, any ideas that you might have
for getting the eyeballs of potential counterparties please let us know.

This email marks the first of regular updates on our credit trading
initiatives.  We will use this as a mechanism to keep all of you in the loop
as to where we are in the implementation process and solicit your input on
ways to integrate credit products into your existing business models and
customer base.


Totally agreed.  It is an absolute joke down there.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:40 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: PIRA Draft Report

I hope we have the opportunity to clean up that amature show up there?  ultimately should move to one big fundies group too.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:33 AM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	RE: PIRA Draft Report

I lost $2 million in new deal P&L putting the spread on because they have their curves so srewed up.   With respect to your question, I think the answer is yes because I can sell 02 on-line by controlling the stack (limit orders) and the coal group will sell 03-04 at $35/ton.   I now own this at $32 because they mis-mark their curve in 04 by $4.00/ton (ie negative $2 million in new deal P&L.)

The bottom line is it was painful putting that spread on.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:26 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: PIRA Draft Report

can you get any more of that spread?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:24 AM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	RE: PIRA Draft Report

Good info.   Consistent with reports from McGowan.   I am now short 02 at $39/ton and long 03-04 at $32.50/ton.   Love the spread given my view of natty.

Since the report is almost identical to info I have received from McGowan, I don't see any pressing need to call Alan.   You are certainly free to call him if you want.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 9:03 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	PIRA Draft Report

Kevin -

I just received this.  You may want to read it and we can give Alan a call if you like.

Rogers
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Allan Stewart" <astewart@pira.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Allan+20Stewart+22+20+3Castewart+40pira+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 8:21 AM
To:	Pradhan, Salil
Cc:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	RE: Request for Information/Status Report

I have attached a copy of a draft section to our upcoming eastern grid for
your comment. I would be interested in your views of our views.

Regards,
Allan Stewart

 - COALEast.doc << File: COALEast.doc >>


Expedia.com
Home Page
[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]

		[IMAGE]
		Special Offer from Expedia.com

[IMAGE]

OPTIONS

[IMAGE]

Go to Expedia.com

[IMAGE]

		 Dear Expedia.com Traveler,

		Announcing a limited-time offer on Northwest Airlines from Expedia.comc.

		If you book a Northwest flight on Expedia.com between now and September 29,
2000, you could get an immediate 10% discount.*  That,s because Expedia.com
is offering this limited-time discount on select Northwest flights that
depart from or arrive at 23 select cities within the contiguous 48 United
States.

		So if you,re considering a trip, make sure you check out Expedia.com and
Northwest Airlines, and do it now*this offer expires soon!

		Remember, the last day you can purchase your ticket and reap the 10% savings
is September 29, 2000. But your travel can take place anytime between
September 19 and December 14, 2000.  So don,t let this offer get away.

		Just click this link to see if your cities qualify and find out more details
to help plan your trip. Then all you have to do is pack your bags and pocket
the savings!

		Expedia.com Travel Team
		Don't just travel. Travel Right.

		P.S. This offer is available to everyone.  So be sure to forward this e-mail
to anyone you think might like to get away and save money at the same time!

		*10% discount available on select fares booked from 12:01 AM September 12,
through 11:59 PM September 29, 2000, for travel September 19-December 14,
2000. Saturday-night stay and 7 days advance purchase required. Maximum stay:
30 days. Blackout dates: November 22 and 26, 2000. Subject to availability.
Individual fare rules and other restrictions may apply. Not all Northwest
destinations are available with this offer. Ticket purchases made on
Expedia.com using the Flight Price Matcher service do not qualify for this
offer.

		About this mailing: You are receiving this e-mail because you are a
registered member of Expedia.com c.  Your Expedia c membership is free and
your privacy and credit card security are guaranteed.  If you have other
questions, visit the Expedia.com Service Center.

		If you do not wish to receive any further promotional e-mails from us, please
reply to this mail with "unsubscribe" in the subject line. Forget your user
name or password? Click here.

		We're sorry, but we cannot reply to responses to this e-mail.  If you'd like
to give us feedback, click here.

		,2000 Expedia, Inc. Expedia, Expedia.com, the Airplane logo, and "Don't just
travel. Travel Right." are either registered trademarks or trademarks of
Expedia, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. All rights
reserved. Other company and product names mentioned herein may be trademarks
of their respective owners. Expedia terms of use.

		This email was sent to:  mark.taylor@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000
10:25 AM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
08/21/2000 10:25 AM
To: Dick Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Memo on Vitro Project

Dick, you need to agree with Max on the scope to be provided by the OE - I
expect high quality service for the money we are paying.  The deal on Friday
is completely dependent on a pre-arranged scope and a minimum quality of
service.  I expect high quality EE&CC  people to be proactively managing cost
and exposure and to be there for the whole process - no pulls to other
business lines.  If Max or Virgo are not happy I am not happy.

I make money you make money.

Thanks for your cooperation.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000
10:16 AM ---------------------------

	Enron de Mexico

	From:  Max Yzaguirre @ ENRON                           08/21/2000 09:40 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Memo on Vitro Project

Dave:

FYI, I got this from Dick.  Just want to confirm that it's consistent with
your recollection.

Best regards - Max

---------------------- Forwarded by Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron on 08/21/2000
09:40 AM ---------------------------

	Dick Westfahl @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	08/21/2000 09:02 AM

To: Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Memo on Vitro Project

Max:

See attached memo on the above referenced project.

Dick


Please stop by this morning for cake and cookies and wish Donna the best of
luck on her wedding this weekend!

Congratulations Donna!


Cc list suppressed...

Re-Reg incoming....

From D.S. George, ALSTOM ESCA

August 10, 2000

California's Governor Orders Regulators
To Slash Electric Rates in Southern Areas

By ANDY PASZTOR and JASON LEOPOLD
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Gov. Gray Davis ordered California utility regulators to
immediately slash electricity rates in southern parts of the
state by about 50%. The move threatens to ratchet up the
political debate over high power prices and could end up
pitting California against federal regulators.

If the appointed Public Utilities Commission approves such a
rollback, typical residential electric bills for some 1.1
million customers would shrink to about $55 a month from the
current $122 level, according to Sempra Energy's San Diego
Gas & Electric Co. unit. Rates have nearly doubled in the
past three months. The governor's plan also would
essentially freeze rates for the next two years.

Consumers and Regulators Seek to Cope With Lingering
California Power Crisis (Aug. 4)[PARA]Deregulation Leaves
Electricity Market Ripe for Manipulation by Power Firms
(Aug. 4)[PARA]California Agencies Are Beset by Major
Electricity Shortages (Aug. 3)[PARA]California Cuts Price
Cap for Electricity Once Again (Aug. 2)

Stretching from the Mexican border to the southern part of
Orange County, the region affected by the order has been
hard hit by steep price spikes stemming from local power
shortages, regulatory confusion and unusually hot weather.
As a result of deregulation, area consumers in July 1999
became the first California residents to pay market prices
for power.

While the utilities commission isn't slated to hold an
emergency meeting until Aug. 21, commissioner Richard Bilas
said that Wednesday's announcement already was branded as
"extreme" by some state lawmakers who accused Gov. Davis of
trying to "pre-empt the legislature" by capitalizing on the
politically charged issue. The legislature previously had
scheduled to take up the issue of proposed rate rollbacks as
early as Thursday.

The state commission last week rejected call for mandatory
rate reductions. But Wednesday, commission president Loretta
Lynch said the governor is "calling for the right thing" to
provide "price relief and some predictability" to San Diego
customers. The governor also announced an agreement with
grocery store operators that could result in as much as a
10% voluntary reduction in energy use by such stores when
power supplies are especially tight.

Democratic State Sen. Steve Peace says that consumption in
fast-growing parts of the state, like the San Diego area,
have surged to levels that weren't anticipated until 2015.
Mr. Peace, the architect of deregulation here, is urging
state agencies not to approve any sales of interests in
power plants owned by California-based utilities until
conditions normalize.

Meanwhile, the Navy isn't waiting for state initiatives.
With its San Diego power bills projected to climb to $39
million from the $20 million budgeted from June to
September, Navy planners have been quietly studying the
possibility of bringing in two of their own generators to
supply electricity to San Diego bases. In addition, admirals
have demanded sharp reductions in power usage, including
orders to turn off all lights in many offices during peak
times. "We are working by the lights of our computers," said
a Navy spokesman. As Sedge's largest San Diego customer, the
Navy uses about 130 megawatts per day during high demand
periods.

Steve Baum, president and chief executive of Sempra, said
the "electric market is broken" and all factions must work
together to prevent out-of-state generators from "gouging"
California residents by selling power "at unconscionably
high prices." But he said state utility regulators are
better equipped to find ways to cushion the blow from
wholesale price hikes than are "instant-pudding bills"
proposed by lawmakers.

Write to Andy Pasztor at andy.pasztor@wsj.com and Jason
Leopold at jason.leopold@wsj.com


Jay said they tracked down the issue.  I don't understand it either...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:34 PM
To:	Richter, Brad
Subject:	EOL to Sitara Bridge Trail

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Bob M
Sent:	Monday, October  29, 2001 1:14 PM
To:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	FW: Request for Migration of Sitara EOLBridge into Production

looks like a fix has been put in place.

thanks

bob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lamadrid, Victor
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:49 AM
To:	Allwein, Robert; Arteaga, Airam; Boudreaux, Shanna; Carter, Tamara; Collins, Joann; Erwin, Stephanie ; Garcia, Clarissa; Gillespie, Steve; Halstead, Lia; Homco, Meredith; Loocke, Kelly; Loving, Scott; Ordway, Chris; Pritchard, Michael; Prudenti, Dan; Ramirez, Robert; Sanchez, Christina; Wood, Tracy
Cc:	Superty, Robert; Hall, Bob M; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Smith, George F.; Pinion, Richard; Jaquet, Tammy; Farmer, Daren J.; Greif, Donna; Ames, Chuck; Brawner, Sandra F.; Germany, Chris; Goodell, Scott; Hodge, John; Keavey, Peter F.; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Neal, Scott; Pereira, Susan W.; Pimenov, Vladi; Ring, Andrea; Savvas, Leonidas; Smith, Maureen; Taylor, Craig; Townsend, Judy; Versen, Victoria; Vickers, Frank
Subject:	FW: Request for Migration of Sitara EOLBridge into Production

All,  A fix to prevent the occurrence of deals not bridging to Sitara from EOL when deal start and end dates were not entered on EOL has been installed and tested.THANKS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:22 PM
To:	Wei, Zhiyong
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara; Truong, Dat; Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Subject:	Request for Migration of Sitara EOLBridge into Production

Hello Zhiyong,
	I have implemented an enhancement to avoid the problem of restarting the Sitara EOLBridge when there are missing startdate and enddate.  This fix will take care of this morning's problem.

EOL will be sent a Failed status similar to the following:
	message={EolTransactionId=2101638 TransactionSysDealId="" BridgeEntityName="EOLBridge" Message="Missing StartDate or EndDate" Status="F" BridgeDate="20011025170945CDT"}

I throughly tested the change by sending over 400 sample deals from this morning.  Due to the "Bid Week" window, please approve this  bridge enhancement for tonight's migration.  Thank you.

-Dat Truong x63015

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Truong, Dat
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:11 AM
To:	Moorer, Torrey; Lamadrid, Victor; Severson, Russ; Grant, George
Cc:	Husain, Karima; Lim, Francis S.; Saluja, Gurdip; Sweitzer, Tara
Subject:	Sitara EOL Bridge Problem Today

The problem we faced today was due to 2 eol deal packets (2098073, 2099764) not having startdate and enddate.  Missing these 2 tibco message fields caused the bridge to bounce and resulted in the queue to build up while the bridge is starting up. (The bridge takes 2 minute for startup).  Each time these deals are sent/resent, it continuously cause the Sitarar EOLBridge to restart, thus magnifying the buildup of the queue.

The corrective action we are taking at our end is to build a rejection logic when eol packets do not have start and/or enddate.

-Dat Truong


Look what I found in my inbox.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Land, Heather" <Heather.Land@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 5:12 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	Letter of Credit language

Chris,
I believe Hector Alatorre has told you about the letter of credit that is
needed.  I have attached the format for Transco.  If you have any questions
please let me know.  Thanks.
 <<LOC Transco-.doc>>

Heather Land
Treasury Analyst
Williams Gas Pipeline Company
P.O. Box 1396
Houston, TX 77251
Phone: (713) 215-2529
Fax: (713) 215-3648

 - LOC Transco-.doc


What occurred at this point in prior months?  Who was allocated the volume?

D

	From:  Stella L Morris                           12/16/99 06:04 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: UA4 - Meter 1441 for 11/97 - Falfurrias

Daren - I need your help in resolving this issue.  There wasn't any deal in
OSS for the above reference meter, nor could I find anything in CPR.  The
contract shows 089-41500-102 representing a sale in the amount of 9448.

Thanks, Stella


Glen, at page 1020 of the transcript of yesterday's proceedings, the judge
asked you and Norm Pedersen to work with various other parties to develop an
exhibit reflecting capacity at the California border.  The judge mentioned
she wanted to discuss the exhibit this morning, so I am surprised that you
did not attempt to contact me to get Transwestern's input or at least to let
us review the exhibit.  I would like to review the exhibit as soon as
possible.  I am out of town but you can either e-mail it to me or fax it to
941-466-2198 (before 3 pm PDT).  Also, I should be reachable on my mobile
phone (713-494-5002) or by voice mail at my office (713-853-0596).


Did you know Darren Cingel is sponsored by Santa Cruz and has his own
snowboard model:

http://www.scsnowboards.com/bios/bios.html


Done.  I did the 1999 changes as well.

DG    3-9573

	From:  Tricia Truong                           11/21/2000 01:50 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EnerVest S# 27239

Darron,
Could you please change rate on the above Sitara to $4.878216 for Oct. 00
production?

Thanks for your help,
T  3-9852


Mr. Greg Whalley
President Enron NetWorks
Enron Corporation

Dear Mr. Whalley:

I am pleased to invite you to join my CERA colleagues and me at our 20th
annual Executive Conference, "Shooting the Rapids: Strategies and Risks for
the Energy Future" to be held February 12-16, 2001 in Houston, Texas.? This
is the premier international gathering offering senior executives new ideas,
insights and strategic thinking on the issues facing the global energy
industry.

I believe you will find the conference and related social events timely and
of considerable value.? Our focus will be on the critical implications of the
current market turmoil for energy strategies, investment, regulatory
backlash, competitive dynamics, and industry structure.? Presentations cover
all key regions and energy sectors -- oil, natural gas and power -- and their
interconnections.? The conference is the centerpiece of CERAWeek, a full week
of senior level meetings designed to foster exchange and learning, as well as
informal interaction and networking.? Last year's participants included some
1600 executives from over 57 countries.

Complete details on CERAWeek 2001 can be found at?
http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/mc.cfm?p=670&c=52302? . To register, please go
directly to http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/mc.cfm?p=781&c=52302? ; email
register@cera.com; or call us at 1 (800) 879-2372 ext. 800 (outside the U.S.
(617) 497-6446 ext. 800).? I hope you will join us!

Sincerely,

Daniel Yergin
Chairman, Cambridge Energy Research Associates

Should you experience problems reaching the web site using the links above,
please go to http://www.cera.com/ceraweek/
*****************************************************************
Our relationship with you is very important to us.? If you wish not to
receive future e-mail notifications, please send a reply to this message with
"DoNotEmail" as the subject of your message. (
mailto:info@cera.com?subject=DoNotEmail )? Please indicate whether you wish
to be removed from the conference list or alternatively from the list for any
future CERA notifications.

*****************************************************************


The telephone interview with Ming Sit has been scheduled for Tuesday,
May 23rd at 12:30 PM Houston time.  It will be in EB19C2.

Krishna will find out if he will call you or if you should call him at work.

Thanks

Shirley


Here is the weekend edition:

This information is for the private use of the recipient and may not be
disclosed to any other entity (including affiliates) without the prior
written consent of Enron North America.  All of the above prices are
&indicative8 prices  and are subject to change depending upon changing market
conditions and liquidity.  The transactions are also subject to negotiation
of mutually acceptable definitive agreements, satisfactory credit
arrangements and the approval of the respective management,s of our two
companies. This term sheet is not intended to create a binding or enforceable
contract nor is it an offer or a commitment to enter into any transaction.
All terms are subject to change until  agreement as to a specific transaction
has been reached.  ENA is not acting as a fiduciary or advisor and you should
evaluate and understand the terms, conditions, and risks of all transactions
in making your decisions with respect theret


Just send me $50 and we won't worry about it.  I would also like a new golf
shirt but I don't think I want the name Clinton on it right now.  Try to get
me an AEP shirt.

Paul J Leanza@EES
07/21/2000 08:59 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, kdstep@ceg.com
cc: John Dietrich/DUB/EES@EES
Subject: Re: PNG Local Production July 00

Here is what I know.  We started pulling 430 MCF (443 dth) from pool N424PB
effective 7-1-00 which was changed to 430 dth effective 7-18-00.  I'm
assuming pool N424PB is the CES/ENA non-priority pool.  Let me know if we
need to do anything different on our side.

Paul

Chris Germany@ECT
07/18/2000 05:23 PM
To: kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com @ ENRON, dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com
cc: Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul J Leanza/DUB/EES@EES, John M
Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: PNG Local Production July 00

Actually, we should be nominating only 4,000 month from Power Gas and 300 day
from Phillips Production.  That works out to about 429 day.

I just spoke to Samson and he agrees the volume for July should only be 4,000
for the month.

AND Angie (my super fantastic, can't say enough good things about her, will
probably be my boss someday and sometimes acts like it,  CNG scheduler) has
agreed to help out any way she can.  She knows escript pretty well.  Chat
with Doug, if you guys agree, Angie can use your ID and password and figure
out how to run all the reports we need back to January.  Also, we will not
know the actuals for July production until September sometime.

Effective August 1st, the Phillip's wells should be transferred to Clinton's
brand new pool and Clinton will also nominate the Power Gas pool gas.

Doug, John Singer said he does not have any production reports from Heidi.
With Angie's help, we could probably clear up the CNG LDC activity fairly
easy.

Let me know what you guys think.

kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com on 07/18/2000 02:02:39 PM
To: " - *Chris_Germany@enron.com" <Chris_Germany@enron.com>, " -
*pleanza@enron.com" <pleanza@enron.com>
cc: " - *Kinney, Doug" <dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: PNG Local Production July 00

Hi Paul and Chris,
 Our friend Sampson at Power Gas still maintains that their local
production behind PNG has not been nominated for July yet, which was 7500
dth/month.  Did you guys do a deal for this gas too?  He usually nominates it
all on one day, so Clinton/CES needs to coordinate with him what day to do it
on (right now the gas is out there on his side on the 17th).  I know Heidi
nominated the Phillips gas baseloaded thru the month at 443/day, but I was not
sure about the Power, until I checked and sure enough the nom isn't out there
yet.
 I can get help nominating it from PNG to get it through CES' pool but I
want to make sure that's what we need to do.  Just give me the word and I will
call Sampson to get it done, but I will make it clear to him that this is the
last month he'll need to talk to me about it.  Thank you very much for the
clarifications!

Kara D. aka the lone ranger at CES


Please notice the individual assignments.  Let me know if you have any
questions or concerns.

Thanks - Jeff


As you may be aware, the Chief Judge informed the parties to the settlement proceeding this afternoon that he intends to recommend to the Commission that it employ the June 19 rate methodology for the refund period from October 2 forward.

Attached are draft comments that Sarah Novosel and I propose to submit to the Judge and his legal staff tomorrow.  While we would like to convince the Judge that the June 19 methodology is not appropriate, we also provide a fallback approach.

Please review the comments (they are only 4 pages) and send your comments to us.  We plan to submit the comments tomorrow.

Thanks

Ray and Sarah


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.
ERROR: File O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041018.txt is empty.


Very funny - although I have to say I thought yours was the least humorous of
the bunch.


Please put on my calendar.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:08 PM
To:	Assad, Sergio; Dadson, Aleck; Guerrero, Janel; Ibrahim, Amr; Kaufman, Paul; Kingerski, Harry; Mara, Susan; Migden, Janine; Montovano, Steve; Nord, Sue; Robertson, Linda; Ryall, Jean; Steffes, James D.; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:

Rick would like to hold a Direct Report conf. call on Thursday, September 6.  Please mark your calendars for a 30 minute call to begin @ 10:00 AM (CDT).  The dial information will be 1-800-283-1805.

Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160


it was almost worth buying a ticket

"Jennifer White" <jenwhite7@zdnetonebox.com> on 03/08/2001 07:30:39 AM
To: john.arnold@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ooops....

Someone did win the lottery.  Perhaps I shouldn't watch the news on mute
if I want to get the story straight.

Also...another La Strada brunch this Sunday.  Will it ever end???

---- "Jennifer Brugh" <jmb@triadresources.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> It's that time again, yep La Strada time!  On Sunday, March 11th we
> are
> meeting at La Strada on Westheimer at 11:00 to wish farewell to Courtney.
>
> Let me know if you can make it!
>
> Jennifer
>
>

___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com


Please click on the attached link to launch your Holiday Party invitation.

 http://invitation.enron.com

Please direct any questions to Dorie Hitchcock via email.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000
08:54 AM ---------------------------

Ashley Baxter@ENRON on 10/12/2000 07:19:55 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Radu Tutos/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Denise Rancour/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Cal Berkeley General Presentation Confirmation - 10/16/00

We have been able to secure rooms at the Claremont Hotel in Berkeley.  Please
note the confirmation numbers listed below.  Thanks!

Claremont Resort and Spa - Berkeley
41 Tunnel Road
Berkeley, CA 94705
510-843-3000

FROM OAKLAND AIRPORT: Go straight out of the airport on Airport Blvd. Turn
right on Hegenberger Road. From Hegenberger
follow signs for 880 North. Follow Hwy 880 North and follow signs for Hwy 24
to Walnut Creek. Take the Claremont Avenue exit, turning
left at the bottom of the exit onto Claremont. Turn right on Ashby Avenue
(5th stoplight) and the Hotel's entrance is two blocks ahead on the left.

FROM SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT: Follow signs for Hwy 101 North to San Francisco,
take Hwy 80 East to the Bay Bridge to Oakland.
Cross Bay Bridge on Hwy 80, follow to 580 East, and exit onto HWY 24 to
Berkeley/Walnut Creek.  Follow Hwy 880 North and follow signs for
Hwy 24 to Walnut Creek. Take the Claremont Avenue exit, turning left at the
bottom of the exit onto Claremont. Turn right on Ashby Avenue
(5th stoplight) and the Hotel's entrance is two blocks ahead on the left.

---------------------- Forwarded by Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron on 10/12/2000
07:15 PM ---------------------------

Lara Marie Berry
10/10/2000 04:58 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Radu
Tutos/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Denise
Rancour/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ashley Baxter/Corp/Enron@Enron, Simone Lewis/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Cal Berkeley General Presentation Confirmation - 10/16/00

Cal Berkeley
General Presentation
Monday, October 16th

This note is to confirm that you are scheduled to attend the Cal Berkeley
General Presentation on Monday October 16th.  This e-mail should contain any
information that you need to know pertaining to your trip.  Please print out
a hard copy and bring with you in case of emergency.  If you have any
questions, there is a list of contacts listed below.

Once again, thank you for offering to help with technology recruiting at Cal
Berkeley.  See you on campus!

Lara

The General Presentation will be held:

Monday, October 16th
The Faculty Club
Seaborg Room - 2nd Floor
7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
**Please plan on arriving at the General Presentation by 6:00 p.m.

The General Presentation is designed to educate the students on Enron and the
Global Technology Track.  Following the presentation we will invite the
students to ask questions about Enron and the Global Technology Track.
Please plan to arrive at the General Presentation by 6:00 p.m.  It is
business casual attire.

FLIGHT ARRANGEMENTS:

You are responsible for scheduling your own flight arrangements with your
preferred airline provider.  Please schedule your flight to arrive to the San
Francisco airport on Monday, October 16th.   Please remember that there can
be significant traffic over the Bay Bridge and to get into town at least an
hour prior to the event.  Please make all flight arrangements through the
Travel Agency in the Park so that we are able to take advantage of discount
fares.  If you do not have a representative that you currently use at the
Travel Agency in the Park - feel free to contact Liz Mendiola at 713-860-1140.

RENTAL CAR ARRANGEMENTS:

Once again, you are responsible for scheduling your own rental car
arrangements with your preferred provider.  Your Travel Agency in the Park
representative should be able to assist you with rental car reservations.

HOTEL ARRANGEMENTS:

Hotel reservations are currently being made by our representative at the
Travel Agency in the Park.

As soon as we have confirmation numbers, I will let you know.

San Francisco Airport to The Faculty Club

Take 101 Northbound
Exit to San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge
Exit to 1-80 East
Exit on University Ave.
East on University Avenue for 1.5 miles to Oxford St.
Right on Oxford St., left on Durant Ave., left on Piedmont
You will see parking on the right side

Once again, thank you so much for helping with the General Presentation.
Below are some last minute tips to keep in mind:

Please remember to dress business casual.
Please remember to bring some business cards for students.
I have attached a pdf version of the Global Technology Track  brochure.
Please forward all expense receipts to Grace Garcia.  She will handle any
expenses incurred for this recruiting trip including: flight costs, hotel,
car, food, valet, etc.  However, you must turn in some sort of receipt - so
be sure and save them!

Ashley Baxter   work:  713-853-3589
    cell:  281-793-0567

Lara Berry   work:  713-345-8320
    cell:  713-857-1034

Grace Garcia   work:  713-853-7252

Simone Lewis   work:  713-853-1645


Dear Signature Services(TM) Client,

Your Schwab Access(TM) account has been opened.  You should
receive a package containing instructions for using your account
and your account number within 3-5 business days.  For security
reasons we cannot send your account number via e-mail.  If you
are opening both a new Schwab One and a Schwab Access account,
you will receive information for each account separately.

You will also receive the following packages and features within
10 business days.
*  Schwab Access checks
*  Gold Visa(R) debit card (if requested)
*  Schwab BillPay(TM) package (if requested)

For security, you will receive the PIN number for your Gold Visa
debit card shortly after you get your card.  You will also
receive a separate mailing with your Schwab BillPay security code.

To get a feel for the experience and features of your new account,
test-drive the demo at:  http://www.schwab.com/accessdemo

Logging in to Your New Account
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Once you have your new account number, log into the Customer
Center by clicking on:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start

2. Enter your 8-digit account number and temporary password
(the last 4 digits of your Social Security number).  To
protect your account, remember to establish your own unique
password immediately after logging in for the first time.

For Customers Who Already Have a Schwab One Account
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please make sure that you have funded your new Schwab Access
account to adequately cover your outstanding transactions. Any
outstanding Schwab One checks, Visa debit card transactions, ATM
withdrawals and bill payments are now debited to your Schwab Access
account.  If you need to move funds between accounts, log into
schwab.com, click on "Move Money" and then "Between Schwab Accounts".

Contact Us
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have any questions about your Schwab Access account,
please call 1-888-274-5738 or contact Schwab Signature Services.

We thank you for choosing Schwab.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
(C)2000 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.  All rights reserved.
Member SIPC/NYSE.  (0500-2306)

NOTICE: All e-mail sent to or from Charles Schwab corporate
e-mail system is subject to archival, monitoring, and/or review
by Schwab personnel.


Mrs. Lovett asked me to let you know that her  appointment with Tom Simmons
of Spencer Stuart is at 3:00 p.m. today.? She  welcomes encouragement for pro
bono services from any of you who have a  particularly strong relationship
with Tom and Spencer Stuart.
?
Linda Gardner
Executive Assistant
Greater Houston Community  Foundation


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 05:12 PM
---------------------------

"Bonnie & Rayford Abraham" <abraham5@flash.net> on 02/16/2001 05:05:32 PM
To: <Dana.Davis@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Spiritual Gifts Discovery Tool

Hey Dana,
?
I have used this one before.? It's pretty  good...see what you think.? There
is another one that I like better, but I  can't find it.?? I will forward
when I come across it.
?
Bonnie
?
?http://www.cforc.com/sgifts.cgi
 - Spiritual Gifts Discovery Tool.url


Stan,

Here's the latest message points from EEI regarding retail standards.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Brown/HOU/EES on 07/19/2000 09:59 AM
---------------------------

"Michael McGrath" <MMcGrath@eei.org> on 07/19/2000 08:28:52 AM
To: <Burrell.G.Kilmer@bge.com>, <geoffrey.green@cmpco.com>,
<JTG@dps.state.ny.us>, "Alice Travis" <ATravis@eei.org>, "Charles Foster"
<CFoster@eei.org>, "Elizabeth Stipnieks" <EStipnieks@eei.org>, "William
Mayer" <WMayer@eei.org>, <jbrown1@enron.com>, <nhetrick@enron.com>,
<Cacquard@erols.com>, <Rbrown@exeloncorp.com>, <jbladen@newenergy.com>,
<refuller@nyseg.com>, <jcunningham@paea.org>, <bbradley@peco-energy.com>,
<bdcrowe@peco-energy.com>, <jmminneman@pplweb.com>,
<craig.glazer@puc.state.oh.us>, <cherie-broadrick@reliantenergy.com>,
<keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com>, <deichenlaub@scc.state.va.us>,
<ccraven1@txu.com>, <sharon.b.grove@ucm.com>, <kathy.smith@us.abb.com>
cc:
Subject: Future of Retail UBP

Attached are talking points expressing my view of where we've been and where
we are going.

Comments appreciated!

We will doscuss next steps in the Advisory Cmte conference call tomorrow.

Thanks
  -Mike

 - UBP.advcmte.talkingpoints.doc


Just keeping you in the loop.  Let me know if you need any help on this.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sherrick, Jeffrey
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 4:40 PM
To: Aronowitz, Alan; Wallace, Stephen; Walls, Rob
Cc: Carolan, Dominic; Chatham, Gerry
Subject: Carolan redeployment to LNG group

I am very pleased that Dominic has been offered an opportunity to re-deploy
from EGEP to the LNG legal group upon the completion of his current
assignment in the disposition of Enron's China E&P assets.  As you know, we
have been going through the data-room process and we will be calling for
final bids on April 9th.  Dominic is finalizing the draft PSA and associated
bidding documents at this time.  We plan to distribute a copy of such to all
potential bidders by the end of the week.

At this time we have 15 companies that have signed the CA and are at various
stages in the evaluation process.  We believe we have 7-8 serious bidders and
we hope to get at least 3-4 bids submitted on the 9th.  To complicate the
process a little, we have 3 majors seriously evaluating both the E&P
properties and the old EI China pipeline project.  We are coordinating with
Chris Hunt, Bill Krenz and Keith Stepp on the integrated sale of both assets
with this select group of companies.  In addition to the  current drafting
work, we will have a few additional data-room visitors prior to the 9th, due
diligence requests and, of course, definitive agreement negotiations to
conclude before the process is complete.

The reason I outlined the above is to give all concerned parties a feel for
the process we need Dominic to participate in (to varying degrees) until it
is concluded.  There will be times where this project will require 100% of
his time for several days and then other times where there will be a few days
with no pressing issues.  However, to avoid any confusion over the next
couple of months I thought it would be a good idea to lay out a few ground
rules for Dominic's time.

1) EGEP supports Dominic re-deploying to the LNG group and will strive to get
him 100% transferred as soon as practical.
2) During the next couple of months Dominic will have some "dead time" in the
China disposition and during this time we are supportive of Dominic spending
time with the LNG group, getting up to speed with the activities in the group
and taking on low-priority assignments that could be delayed if his time was
needed in the sale process.
3) The only assignment Dominic has to complete with EGEP is the sale of the
China assets.  There will be no future assignments.
4) Until EGEP senior management releases Dominic to the LNG group, his
primary responsibility will be the China sale and this activity will take
precedence over any other assignments.
5) Until EGEP senior management releases Dominic to the LNG group, his
primary office will remain in 3 Allen Center with EGEP.  He is expected to
report to 3 Allen Center and the daily 8:30 am disposition meeting to
ascertain any sale related needs for his time.  This meeting usually lasts
for 30-45 minutes and if there are no issues he can report to the LNG group.

In some ways I know this appears to be a little silly.  However, I also know
that if we don't set out a few rules we will encounter a problem and it is
not fair to Dominic or in Enron's best interest to let Dominic take on two
"A-priority" projects at this time.  We need his services to successfully
sell this project. Unfortunately, we can not schedule when certain activities
will be needed, but we will be reasonable whenever possible to allow for a
smooth effort in both groups.  During the next couple of months I'm sure
Dominic will be a very positive addition to your staff in spite of the time
allocated to the China sale effort.  He has been a very productive and
valuable employee for our group and I am very glad Enron found a way to
retain his services.

If you have any questions please give me a call.  Thanks for your support
during this short-term need in our group.  We will try to make this
inconvenience as small as possible.

jeff


Attached final (?) numbers for invoice ??
We will need to cash out (ENA buy) the 12 dt remaining balance.
Can you review prior to departing ?
Also to confirm 5/3 - purchased 4250 at gate at $4.90.


Dear Jeff:
>
>     It was great catching up with you and the other committee members
> Friday night. Thank you again for asking me to join the group. I
> thoroughly enjoyed our work and serving our city. I
> really hope we will have another opportunity to work together again in the
near future.
>
>   I have materials regarding Antonio Villaraigosa, the candidate for
> mayor of LA. The election is on Tuesday, June 5 and the polls show the
> race to be a toss up. The outcome will likely depend upon which candidate
> can use radio and TV most effectively over the last few days.  I
> understand that his campaign went into debt to purchase the advertising
> over this week end through election day. Contributions sent Monday
> overnight will certainly be noticed and appreciated. Contributions would
> be to Villaraigosa for Mayor, they are not tax deductible and are limited
> to $1,000 per person, including corporations, labor unions, PACs and
> individuals. Whether Villaraigosa wins or loses, you certainly should
> consider a fund raiser after the election. (It would need to be structured
> in a particular way.) Villaraigosa will remain a star and may eventually
> be elected either Mayor of LA and later Governor. He will remain very
> influential even if not elected.
>
>     Jeff, obviously, the overall issue for Enron and your brethren
> energy companies is how to turn around the terrible image of "predator"
energy companies in California and other states frightened by the perceived
effects of energy
> deregulation.  Unfortunately, too many energy spokesmen have used
> what I believe is the wrong tactic: espousing the theoretical virtues of
> free markets instead of conveying concern for the consumer.
>
>     All politicians in California are going to be somewhat wary of being
> perceived as "giving in" to the energy interests. However, I believe that
the Latino community in southern and northern California would be open minded
in the energy debate and would be impressed with support for Latino
candidates and causes. As you know, Latino elected officals now control the
California State Assembly.
      Before I moved my family to Houston four years ago, I had lived in Los
Angeles for seventeen years and I still have a pretty good network. I would
be pleased to help in any way I can, including  making introductions, and
discussing options.
>
>     Let me know if you are interested in any of this.  (cell:
 713-927-4865, h: 713-463-8138, o: 713-968-4500).
Take good care,
.>
> Roel


---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 07/14/2000 07:25
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           07/09/2000 03:55 PM

To: Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pooling Meeting July 14, 2000

Jane, any chance you or Randy or Tori could go to this meeting?  Norm has
called it for this Friday, presumably to discuss some of the points you
raised in your discussion with him (according to the voice mail he left me).
It will be in El Paso, starting at 1:00 pm MT.

Unfortunately, I don't think I can make it, and I've left Norm a voice mail
message to that effect.  However, I'm not too optimistic about it getting
rescheduled for next week.  I'm losing 2-1/2 days going to Las Vegas for the
settlement conference as it is, and I will have to get my Order 637 comments
finalized by Friday afternoon in order to get them filed next Monday.  We
have some big problems with segmentation proposals (or lack thereof) for
Columbia and CNG, as well as some issues on several of the other pipelines
that filed.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 07/09/2000
03:42 PM ---------------------------

"Walker, Norman E." <WalkerN@EPEnergy.com> on 07/07/2000 05:12:58 PM
To: bcantre@enron.com, skinnml@texaco.com, rfoss@coral-energy.com,
tcarlson@apsc.com, pcervin@br-inc.com, pwri@dynegy.com,
gcvenz@duke-energy.com, petersdd@bp.com, john.hogan@southernenergy.com,
sam.brown@swgas.com, rbetonte@socalgas.com, pwah@socalgas.com,
carla.j.johnson@usa.conoco.com, nicholas.e.rassinier@usa.conoco.com,
rishikawa@socalgas.com, "Walker, Norman E." <WalkerN@EPEnergy.com>, "Royal,
Kathleen S." <RoyalK@EPEnergy.com>, emorris@oneok.com, sgentry@oneok.com,
susan.jones@ep.pge.com
cc: "Johnson, Susan L." <JohnsonS@EPEnergy.com>
Subject: Pooling Meeting July 14, 2000

Below are (1) a notice and agenda for a meeting July 14 in El Paso, (2) a
list of the invitees, (3) a draft of the goals that was sent out after the
last meeting and (4) a list of the receipt points grouped into the 18
pooling areas that we will be discussing.  Thank you to everyone who has
taken the time to discuss the 18 pool alternative (orginally the 16 pool
alternative).

If you have any questions regarding arrangements in El Paso, please contact
Ms. Susan Johnson at 915-496-2239.

Have a safe trip and I will see you Friday.

Norm

 <<Notice and agendas July 14.doc>>  <<Invitees july 14.doc>>  <<Draft of
Goals 20000606.doc>>  <<Pooling Point Daily Average Quantities 1999 and
2000.xls>>

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************

 - Notice and agendas July 14.doc
 - Invitees july 14.doc
 - Draft of Goals 20000606.doc
 - Pooling Point Daily Average Quantities 1999 and 2000.xls


The Direct Service payments are not processed through Payroll and I am not aware of the payment schedule.  I believe these payments are handled by the Service Connection.  Can you please work with Irma Alvarez for this piece?

Is the Fidelity Goal Planner the items which were previously set up a a deduction and were converted to Direct Deposit a few years ago?  If so, these payments will automatically be scheduled for payment on tomorrow.

Please let me know if additional information is needed from me.

Thanks,
Diane

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Barrow, Cynthia
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:17 PM
To:	Roman De Mezza, Maryann
Cc:	Jordan, Sheri; Davis, Sarah A.; Vasquez, Cynthia; Taylor, Diane; Joyce, Mary; Pieper, Kalen; Cash, Michelle
Subject:	follow-up to request for data collection

Attached is the listing of payables for Benefits (and most cost related to Dr. Office).  Please use this as a template for the information you are collecting on the BodyShop, Health Center and Dr. Office.   Maryann consider this a template.  Do not add to this file.  Create a new file with the same headings.  We can not risk any modification to what is already submitted related to the Corp. ERISA plans.   If you have any quesitons get with me ASAP.

In addition, I need you to work with Sheri Jordan to get information on the Service Awards, Cynthia Vasquez for the cost for Direct Service and Fidelity Goal Planner, and Sarah Davis for DayCare.  The information on Direct Service and the Fidelity Goal Planner may already be in progress by Payroll since these are payroll deductions.  (Diane, please let Maryann know as soon as possible if you all are already working on this.  If not, Cynthia will need someone in Payroll to help with how the payment of these items flow via payroll as well as the estimate of the next payment due.)

If you can think of anything else in your area that is a payable (e.g., MetClub) please include.

Thanks
Cb

 << File: Corpcosts.xls >>


Mark,

Please route Contract no. 96006024 to Gerald Nemec for his review.

Gerald,

I will be routing to you an amendment to the above mentioned contract.

Thank you.

Marlene


(See attached file: HPLN0126.xls)

 - HPLN0126.xls


November 7, 2001

ATTENTION ALL SHIPPERS/NOMINATING AGENTS AND PLANT OPERATORS:

----EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY----

Due to the continuing warm weather and other operational considerations, Public Service Company (PSCo) cannot accept either:

Imbalance payback gas from Shippers/Nominating Agents
More gas than PSCo's transport customers will consume each day
3.	More gas than the volume currently confirmed from each plant into PSCo's system each day

Plant Operators should restrict deliveries to confirmed nominations ONLY EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE; if over-deliveries become a problem during this period, PSCo will activate flow control valves on any plants involved.

Shippers/Nominating Agents should not nominate any imbalance payback to PSCo for gas day NOVEMBER 9 AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.  Any imbalance gas remaining on the system for this period will be cut to -0- by PSCo.

Additionally, in order to avoid an OFO for over-deliveries (previously known as an OBP), Shippers/Nominating Agents should not nominate more gas than they will consume each day into PSCo's system.  Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Monica Nedbalski
Senior Transportation Specialist

David Briggs - Xcel Energy
Project Administrator
Certified Web Designer
Phone: (303) 571-7812
     Fax: (303) 571-7001
 Email: David.Briggs@Xcelenergy.Com


Vince: Just a short note to congratulate you on your well-deserved promotion.
Jordan


Start Date: 12/30/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001123022.txt
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.
###Cannot locate a Preferred or Revised_Preferred Schedule that matches the FINAL Individual Interchange Schedule.  Unable to assign deal number.


Just for your information

Again, one issue which is key for Enron.  In my view, It took too much time
for us to put a stick on the ground. Back in April, Regulatory Affairs
identified all the riks, opportunities and key success factors one should
face in the rationing.  Now distributors have [finally] agreed that Annex V
is key. The Government proposal to kill Annex V is obscene.

LM
---------------------- Forwarded by Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron on 05/23/2001 11:37
AM ---------------------------

	Debora Klinger
	05/22/2001 07:06 PM

To: Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Generators want to kill Annex V

Maurer,

O primeiro t?pico abaixo foi em sua homenagem!!
A prop?sito, vi Voc ontem no Jornal Nacional, ao lado do Pedro Parente.....??Abra?os??---------------------- Forwarded by Debora Klinger/SA/Enron on 05/22/2001 ?07:11 PM ---------------------------??	Debora Klinger?	05/22/2001 07:45 PM?	?To: Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron?cc: Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred ?Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe ?Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT ??Subject: Re: Generators want to kill Annex V  ??I just attended to the Fiscal-Legal Seminar promoted by ABCE. The first topic ?presented by ABCE,s President by the opening of the Seminar was the ?importance of the maintenance of the Annex V of the Initial Contracts.  ??Among other matters, it was discussed during the event the Concession ?Contract and Rationing. Prof. Caio T?cito (one of the most well known and ?respected scholars) was one of the speakers. According with him, the losses ?in sales and revenues that the D/Cs will suffer as a result of the cut of the ?load may be recovered by D/Cs based on the principle of the re-establishment ?of the economic-financial balancing ("equilibrium") of the concession ?agreement. Prof. T?cito further emphasized his belief that the surcharge ?("sobretarifa") sum that is to be collected should be reserved in favor of ?the D/Cs, so as to compensate partially such losses. Finally, Mr. T?cito ?suggested that in order to avoid legal controversies, the Government could, ?alternatively, conceive using the surcharge ("sobretarifa") collected as ?future credits to be used by consumers when rationing is over.??David Watenberg also ratified such understanding. He further expressed his ?belief that the surcharge ("sobretarifa") has no legal grounds to survive. ?This is so, because according to Paragraph One, Article 6 of the Concession ?Law (Law n. 8987/95) every concession shall render adequate services, ?meaning, among other things, the moderation of the tariffs.??Regards,?D,bora??????Sergio Assad?05/20/2001 11:53 AM?To: Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron?cc: luiz maurer, debora klinger, sergio.assad@enron.com, Luiz ?Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos ?Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose ?Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT ??Subject: Re: Generators want to kill Annex V  ??Orlando??Acho desnecess?rio o conference uma vez que a Debora est? corret?ssima no que ?diz rspeito a impossibilidade da ANEEL intervir no anexoV.  Al,m da D,bora, ?falei com Jos, Em?lio, David Waltenberg e Alo?sio Miranda (Ulhoa Canto) e ?todos tm a mesma opini?o, ou seja: somente uma lei (ou medida provis?ria)
pode alterar o contrato inicial.

O exemplo mais claro dessa possibilidade de intervens?o foi a lei do plano
Real que alterou todos os contratos administrativos.
Quanto . posi??o ENRON, temos unanimidade quanto a cren?a de se respeitar os
contratos. Estamos executando um forte  advocacy nessa linha.
Sergio Assad
Sergio Assad

Orlando Gonzalez
05/19/2001 09:32 AM
To: sergio.assad@enron.com
cc: Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos
Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Generators want to kill Annex V

After today's round of meetings please schedule a  call  tomorrow to review
Enron's position on  all these points.  Sergio Please coordinate and ask
Cristina to set up.  I suggest mid morning on Sunday so we have time to
adjust.  I do not want to defend two or three points of view on the same
subject as Enron.

Luiz Maurer
18/05/2001 22:21
To: Debora Klinger/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos
Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Generators want to kill Annex V

Debora

Good points.

Economic Equilibrium. You are right. We can claim it. However, it may be
virtually impossible to claim the opportunity cost of a foregone long
position. I would not take this risk.

Your statement that ANEEL has no power to change Annex V makes me feel more
confortable. It makes me believe that the right way of approaching the issue
is to prepare a position paper on Monday and to deliver/explain it directly
to Minister Pedro Parente. No need to spend time on consensus building on
issues which are "zero sum game" by nature (two years of COEX have taught me
this lesson).  Let's preempt the issue by being  faster and smarter.

LM

	Debora Klinger
	05/18/2001 09:46 PM

To: Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos
Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Generators want to kill Annex V

Maurer,

This is a very important issue. Although in case of loss to Elektro, we would
always be eligible to claim for the reestablishment of the economic-financial
balancing of the concession agreements, we would be, with no doubt, in a
better position in case we can maintain the Annex V.

Regarding the ANNEL sympathy towards generator,s pressure, I don't believe
ANEEL has the authority to interfere in a duly executed agreement, as it is a
perfect legal act ("ato jur?dico perfeito"). Only the Union is competent to
intervene in such acts, based on the public interest and the social well
being.

I will work hard on the analysis of the matter and come back with further
comments.

Thanks,
D,bora

Luiz Maurer
05/18/2001 09:02 PM
To: Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos
Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose
Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Debora Klinger/SA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Generators want to kill Annex V

The rumor mill says that generators want to revoke Annex V. No surprise. The
bad news is that it seems that Aneel likes the idea.

This may represent a US$ 60 million loss to Elektro, only in 2001.

Distribution companies are [aparently] against this measure. However, D/Cs is
short position will [likely] applaud the idea (to avoid costly exposures in
the MAE)

An Abradee group was created to think about the issue. Joao and Fred will
participate tomorrow.

A few supporting arguments.

1) Contract sanctity. Why changing the rules in the middle of the game if
Annex V was designed specifically to deal with rationing conditions?

2) More subtle argument. The risk of  being exposed is the only economic
incentive  for a D/C to reduce its load. Otherwise, we will have a classical
"free ride" problem: D/Cs will not put any effort to reduce their
loads/revenues and will advocate for an ex-post adjustment on ICs based on
verified load reduction. We can build a case that in the absence of this
exposure, D/Cs will have no incentives to work hand in hand with their
clients to foster load reduction and the whole program will fail.

Debora is working on the legal aspects of Annex V, taking into account the
new MP. Sergio has talked to a few lawyers to get their views/written
opinions.

What about writing a letter to Pedro Parente as Enron, exploring those issues
and explaining why Annex V is so important to the success of the whole
program? (the free ride issue)

LM


is attached.  This version reflects the comments received from Rick, Sarah
and Joe.  Your additional suggestions are welcome.  We hope to finalize the
paper early next week.

 - 0131114.01


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/11/2001 11:22 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	05/23/2001 07:06 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas

FYI
Thanks
Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meringolo, Peter
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 5:01 PM
> To: Fergus, Gary S.
> Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 9:59 AM
> To: Meringolo, Peter
> Subject: FW: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> FYI.
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fergus, Gary S.
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:57 PM
> To: 'hym@cpuc.ca.gov'
> Cc: 'MBD'
> Subject: Enron Proposals Regarding Document Subpoenas
> Importance: High
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>  Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
> production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued
> by the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the
> Commission").  The Enron Entities are willing to assist the Commission in
> undertaking its investigation into the problems in the California electric
> markets by producing the information specified on a timely basis.  We
> believe that the production we propose will enable the Commission to
> commence its investigation much sooner than if the parties were forced to
> litigate all of the potential objections to the requests for production,
> which are, by any standard, extremely broad and could involve millions of
> pages of documents.  We make these proposals pursuant to our email
> exchange of October 3, 2000 with the understanding that the Commission
> agrees that by cooperating, offering to produce or producing documents,
> the Enron Entities have not waived any objections or challenges to these
> subpoenas whatsoever and that any claims, defenses, objections,
> jurisdictional or otherwise or other responses have been specifically
> reserved and can be raised in the future, if necessary.   For all of these
> proposals, we exclude documents that are protected from disclosure by the
> attorney client and attorney work product privileges.
>
>  Generally speaking, the Enron Entities propose to produce documents
> for year 2000 as noted below.  We also understand that the Commission will
> be obtaining documents from the ISO and PX and we will not attempt here to
> duplicate documents that we understand will be produced by those entities.
> As you will see in the general documents that are offered here for
> production, Enron Energy Services Operations, Inc. is the parent of Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. and does not have operating authority or engage in
> wholesale or retail purchases or sales of energy.  Thus, the documents
> offered here with respect to those two entities originates with Enron
> Energy Services, Inc. but we have designated them both as EES.  We also do
> not propose to offer duplicative documents as between the Enron Entities.
>
> GENERAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 1 through 4
>
>  Because of the dynamic nature of the Enron Entities' businesses, the
> burden and expense on them to locate, and produce every corporate
> organizational chart anywhere in their organizations since April 1, 1998
> is significant.   The Enron Entities will provide the Commission with
> exemplars of their current organizational charts, telephone directories
> and so called "family trees" to show its current organization.  To the
> extent that the Enron Entities can readily identify and locate exemplars
> of significant organizational charts, telephone directories or so called
> "family trees" for earlier periods they will also make those available.
> One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its corporate
> history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can provide it.
> With respect to the other Enron Entities, to the extent that corporate
> histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate producing
> these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.
>
> Requests 5 and 6
>
>  The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
> identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction
> Documents will identify its customers and suppliers.  We believe this
> information will be sufficient to illustrate these relationships for the
> staff's purposes.
>
> FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
> Requests 7 through 11
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce their public filings for the period
> requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, EES, and Portland General
> will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data ( the
> "Transaction Documents") for the purchase and sale of energy delivered
> which information includes economic data.   We anticipate producing public
> filings regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and the electronic
> Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> GENERATING DOCUMENTS
> Requests 12, 14 and 18
>
>  For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
> facilities are either non-existent or limited in number and there will
> probably be limited documents available.  The Enron Entities to the extent
> they act as a scheduling coordinator or possessed the right to use or
> resell generation output, do not have the specific documents that pertain
> to each generation unit requested.  The Enron Entities, other than
> Portland General, do have documents and information for Las Vegas
> Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
> document productions.
>
>   For Portland General, the production of the requested documents
> would involve a tremendous volume of documents, as Portland General owned
> twenty generating facilities of a variety of types and sizes during 2000.
> Portland General is a net importer of energy and can only generate about
> one half of its total energy demand.  As a result, we question whether the
> effort required of Portland General is warranted as its impact on the
> California wholesale market is necessarily limited.  Nevertheless,
> Portland General proposes to provide for year 2000 electronic Transaction
> Documents in summary form similar to the data being provided by other
> Enron Entities, to the extent relevant as discussed below.  We propose
> that the Commission defer requesting production of other information until
> it has reviewed the information of generators who sell a significant
> proportion of their energy into the California market.  At that time a
> more accurate assessment can be made of whether this enormous effort will
> be valuable given the limited impact of Portland General generation on the
> California wholesale market.
>
> TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
> Requests 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19
>
>  We understand that the Commission will be obtaining trading data for
> the purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and
> PX.  EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of relevant
> transaction data for year 2000 (in California and outside of California
> and Real Time) for the purchase and sale of energy delivered with the
> date, counterparty, quantity, delivery point, hours, price, and whether it
> is a purchase or a sale.   Because of the speed with which you want this
> information, it is possible that some entries will be incomplete or
> inaccurate.  For those
> transactions where EPMI served only as the scheduling coordinator, we
> understand that the ISO will show part of the transaction, but there will
> not be a corresponding transaction in the EPMI data we can provide
> quickly.  The reason is that this type of transaction is passed through to
> EPMI's customer on an accounting system rather than as part of the trading
> business.  EES can also provide similar data with respect to relevant
> wholesale and retail transactions with the proviso that with respect to
> retail transactions it will not include the specific names of its retail
> customers but instead will provide a blind customer number due to EES'
> confidentiality obligations to those customers.  We anticipate producing
> the Transaction Documents in the second wave of document productions.
>
> FERC DOCUMENTS
>
> Request 20
>
>  The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
> from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
> those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October
> 13, 2000.
>
>
>  Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
> Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
> Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
> make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
> production by then.
>
>  We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
> any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one
> currently in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions
> will be protected by the most stringent protective order.  In addition,
> if, at the request of any party or nonparty to this proceeding, the
> Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction orders that the requests
> for production be limited, reduced or eliminated, the Enron Entities
> reserve the right to limit the production of documents in conformance with
> such order.
>
>  We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
> if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
> comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
> or myself.
>
> Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP
>
> Gary Fergus
>
>
>
>
>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


really?  maybe it was based on time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:38 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

well i know that charlie was promoted and he hasn't done jack

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:37 PM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE:

i don't think jay was promoted.  actually i heard very few people were promoted.  i am not sure about him though.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:36 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

no i am just hearing that most everyone got promoted

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:35 PM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE:

i have no idea.  did you hear he was?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:32 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

just wondering - mainly i was wondering if matt smith is a manager now?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:30 PM
To:	Bass, Eric
Subject:	RE:

i don't know.  why?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:22 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

who all got promoted on your desk?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lenhart, Matthew
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:27 AM
To:	Blanchard, Timothy; Bass, Eric; O'Malley, Justin; 'val.generes@accenture.com'; 'kevin.a.boone@accenture.com'
Subject:	FW:

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bhatia, Randy
Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 10:00 AM
To:	Wolfe, Jason; Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:

http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~rahjr79/ninja.htm


As requested, here is the log for today.


[IMAGE]
 	 	    Dear Andrew,  ENL's Washington Correspondent Peter Cook and I had the chance to speak with newly-confirmed FERC Commissioner Pat Wood on Thursday.  Commissioner Wood discussed what role he would play within the FERC, the issue of price caps in California and the threat by Governor Gray Davis to sue the FERC.       Immediately following the Wood interview, I spoke with former FERC Commissioner Don Santa to get his reaction to the Gov. Davis lawsuit.  If you missed the 1:00 p.m. ET newscast, catch both the Wood and Santa interviews in ENL's Video Library.    The House and Senate are still on recess, but our Washington bureau has much to cover on Friday.  Washington Bureau Chief Jay Cranford reports, with the House and Senate coming back to Capitol Hill on Tuesday, the change of power in the Senate could be decided sometime next week.  Jay says the bureau is scheduled to take a look at some of the comments and reactions from around Washington, and discuss what effect the power shift could have on President Bush's energy plan and the energy debate.  We'll have insight and discussion from our Washington bureau on Friday.     We're also scheduled to bring you segments from Correspondent Stephanie Stanton's trip to Florida.  She attended the groundbreaking ceremony for the Gulfstream Natural Gas Pipeline, which is a joint venture between Duke Energy and Williams Energy, parent company of ENL.  Catch coverage of Stephanie Stanton's trip on Friday.   Houston bureau Correspondent Kim Benestante reports she's scheduled to bring us details from a settlement reached between the Texas environmental agency TNRCC, and a group of refiners/utilities over reducing air emission in Texas.  Kim also says the bureau is scheduled to discuss the Texas Fresh Air Project.  The nation's largest residential retail provider of pollution-free electricity, Green Mountain Energy Company, is sponsoring the project.  We'll have these and other reports from the Houston bureau on Friday.     Also from Houston, I'm scheduled to speak with incoming Vice Chair of the Society of Petroleum Engineers James Pappas.  He'll be discussing the upcoming Eastern Gulf of Mexico lease sale in the 3:00 p.m. ET newscast.  Don't miss the Pappas interview on Friday.   Keep in mind things are subject to change at a moment's notice.  Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.     Keep it on energynewslive.com  for all your energy news.
 			[IMAGE]
	 	Jay Rickerts, EnergyNewsLive.com Anchor  View today's Energy Wrap  video: (Windows Media Player required) Broadband  (100k)   |  Dial-up  (56k)  Get  Windows Media Player   Experience all that Williams Energy  News Live has to offer!   If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue,  subscribe now    To stop receiving this letter,   unsubscribe now     If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Comments? Suggestions? Let us  know  or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.    Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


I am missing the following deal:
Mike Driscol sells to Morgan 50 mw of SP-15 light for cal'02 at $70.00

I think this is a sleave with the EES deal I am missing also.

Thanks!!


fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hendry, Brent
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:23 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	FW: Updated Weather Counterparty that have terminated

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hendry, Brent
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:00 AM
To:	Nguyen, Michael; Windle, Bill; Tawney, Mark
Subject:	RE: Updated Weather Counterparty that have terminated

Here is the updated list.  Not much has changed.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nguyen, Michael
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:04 AM
To:	Hendry, Brent
Subject:	Updated Weather Counterparty that have terminated

Brent,

Would you happen to have an updated version of the counterparties list that have terminated.

Thanks,
Michael


I forgot to ask you about dinner.  Did you still want to go out tonight?
Maybe we could go to an early dinner tomorrow with just Lauren.  Let me
know.  I will make weenies and rice and beans if thats what you want.
heart
me


We are pleased to announce organizational changes to the Enron South America
legal department in response to the recent reorganization and realignment of
the principal Enron Wholesale Services business units operating in the
region, Enron Americas and Enron Global Assets.

Randy Young, currently General Counsel of ESA, will be assuming new
responsibilities within Enron.  John Novak will become General Counsel of
ESA, reporting to Mark Haedicke.  The ESA legal department will be
responsible for supporting all Enron Americas and Enron Global Assets
businesses in the region.  Additional legal resources, coordinated by Lance
Schuler, will be provided from EWS Legal in Houston to support ESA's
wholesale activities.  John will also work closely with Bruce Lundstrom,
General Counsel of EGA, to coordinate legal support with respect to the EGA
businesses in the region.  An organizational chart describing the new
structure is attached.

This new structure will enable us to continue to provide quality legal
support across business lines within South America while improving
coordination and providing additional support from Houston for Enron's
existing operating businesses, as well as the new business development
initiatives under way in the region.


Mr. Lay,

	I am trying to gather a list of FUMC members that work at Enron. Right now, you are my only source.  The Membership manager has no "Work" field to query the members.  I'd like to take advantage of the Enron Matching Program to raise money for the recent tragedy.  I am a member of the Crosstrainers (young singles) group and we are organizing a fundraiser and need extra money for the entertainment.  The Enron donations will go directly towards the NY & Washington tragedies.  Please see the attachment.

Please let me know any FUMC members that work at Enron.  I would like to notify them of the opportunity to come together to match contributions for fundraisers through FUMC.  Thanks so much for your help.

Respectfully yours,

Shelley Johnson

Shelley Johnson
Business Analyst
Global Strategic Sourcing
713-345-6528
333 Clay Street  1116d
Houston, TX  77251
shelley.johnson@enron.com
 http://gss.enron.com/


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 01:40
PM ---------------------------

Louise Kitchen
04/20/2000 11:45 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nikki Slade@ECTLON-1, Shirley McKernan/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Mobile Phone Bill

OK

To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nikki Slade/LON/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Mobile Phone Bill

Can't we just transfer the billing to me?

Louise Kitchen
04/20/2000 09:08 AM
To: Nikki Slade/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Mobile Phone Bill

Yes please

No Easter hols here

Nikki Slade
20/04/2000 08:44

To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Mobile Phone Bill

This is the phone that Mark Taylor has.  Shall I contact Taffy to have it
sent back or James Bruce could bring it back with him.  We could then
transfer it to Suryan Simunovic (Dave Samuels new starter).

Please advise.

Thanks & have a good Easter (is it Easter over there too?)

Sn

Louise Kitchen
20/04/2000 14:38
To: Shirley McKernan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Nikki Slade@ECTLON-1

Subject: Re: Mobile Phone Bill

If this is MArk's phone let's cancel it - if its not - which one is it?

Shirley McKernan
20/04/2000 08:33
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Mobile Phone Bill

Hello Louise,

Your March, 2000 Enron mobile phone bill for 07881512535 has been processed.

DID YOU KNOW...

The Mobile Phone Web Site has today been moved to a new location on the
Intranet Site and the new mobile phone URL is http://mobilephone.enron.co.uk

Also you can easily contact any Enron Mobile Phone User from your Lucent Land
Phone:
*  Press the 'Call Mobile' button
*  Key in the individual's extension number
*  This will automatically dial the mobile number

If your RC Code is incorrect please contact London HRService Centre by e-mail
or Lorna Archer on extension 34207

Payment of Personal Calls from mobile phones will be at the discretion of
your RC Head.

Please check your bill and indicate whether you agree or disagree with the
bill details.  If you disagree, click on the 'COMMENT BUTTON', and enter a
reason.  Accounts will then decide if they need to investigate further.

On your Lotus Notes Workspace (within Notes, select Window/1. Workspace at
Office) there is now another icon called "Mobile Phone Bills". Your bills are
stored here for future reference.

Regards,

Shirley McKernan.

Click here to see your bill ==>


Thanks,

Kay


Do you know if you are going to make it yet?


The email that you sent to me below does not pertain to to the referenced
entity.  Did you send me this email in error?  In order to open to the
brokerage account for Rafael Rangel, we need corporate resolutions and an
authorized traders list for the referenced entity.    On June 1, 2200, I
emailed our form of corp. resolutions and authorized traders list to you and
Rafael.  I will send the email to you again.   Please advise me of when I
should expect to receive these documents so that we can open the acccount.
Please call me if you have any questions.

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490

	Nancy Muchmore@ENRON
	06/20/2000 06:16 PM

		 To: susan.flynn@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Certificate


Please find attached the Hot List and Management Summary for May 18, 2001.

Thanks,
Misti
x39525


Jeff:

Thanks for your note.

As previously discussed with Stephen, EGM Legal will work reasonably and
cooperatively with you guys so that your objectives can be reached on time
while at the same time beginning the process over the coming weeks of
integrating Dominic into our team here.

Please call me directly at x33214 should you wish to talk further about this.

Regards, Alan

	Jeffrey Sherrick/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/20/2001 04:39 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wallace/ENRON@enronXgate, Rob
Walls/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: Dominic Carolan/ENRON@enronXgate, Gerry Chatham/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Carolan redeployment to LNG group

I am very pleased that Dominic has been offered an opportunity to re-deploy
from EGEP to the LNG legal group upon the completion of his current
assignment in the disposition of Enron's China E&P assets.  As you know, we
have been going through the data-room process and we will be calling for
final bids on April 9th.  Dominic is finalizing the draft PSA and associated
bidding documents at this time.  We plan to distribute a copy of such to all
potential bidders by the end of the week.

At this time we have 15 companies that have signed the CA and are at various
stages in the evaluation process.  We believe we have 7-8 serious bidders and
we hope to get at least 3-4 bids submitted on the 9th.  To complicate the
process a little, we have 3 majors seriously evaluating both the E&P
properties and the old EI China pipeline project.  We are coordinating with
Chris Hunt, Bill Krenz and Keith Stepp on the integrated sale of both assets
with this select group of companies.  In addition to the  current drafting
work, we will have a few additional data-room visitors prior to the 9th, due
diligence requests and, of course, definitive agreement negotiations to
conclude before the process is complete.

The reason I outlined the above is to give all concerned parties a feel for
the process we need Dominic to participate in (to varying degrees) until it
is concluded.  There will be times where this project will require 100% of
his time for several days and then other times where there will be a few days
with no pressing issues.  However, to avoid any confusion over the next
couple of months I thought it would be a good idea to lay out a few ground
rules for Dominic's time.

1) EGEP supports Dominic re-deploying to the LNG group and will strive to get
him 100% transferred as soon as practical.
2) During the next couple of months Dominic will have some "dead time" in the
China disposition and during this time we are supportive of Dominic spending
time with the LNG group, getting up to speed with the activities in the group
and taking on low-priority assignments that could be delayed if his time was
needed in the sale process.
3) The only assignment Dominic has to complete with EGEP is the sale of the
China assets.  There will be no future assignments.
4) Until EGEP senior management releases Dominic to the LNG group, his
primary responsibility will be the China sale and this activity will take
precedence over any other assignments.
5) Until EGEP senior management releases Dominic to the LNG group, his
primary office will remain in 3 Allen Center with EGEP.  He is expected to
report to 3 Allen Center and the daily 8:30 am disposition meeting to
ascertain any sale related needs for his time.  This meeting usually lasts
for 30-45 minutes and if there are no issues he can report to the LNG group.

In some ways I know this appears to be a little silly.  However, I also know
that if we don't set out a few rules we will encounter a problem and it is
not fair to Dominic or in Enron's best interest to let Dominic take on two
"A-priority" projects at this time.  We need his services to successfully
sell this project. Unfortunately, we can not schedule when certain activities
will be needed, but we will be reasonable whenever possible to allow for a
smooth effort in both groups.  During the next couple of months I'm sure
Dominic will be a very positive addition to your staff in spite of the time
allocated to the China sale effort.  He has been a very productive and
valuable employee for our group and I am very glad Enron found a way to
retain his services.

If you have any questions please give me a call.  Thanks for your support
during this short-term need in our group.  We will try to make this
inconvenience as small as possible.

jeff


Dad,

Just though I would let you know I talked to a Royal Bank credit specialist this morning and he will get back to me this afternoon. I also talked to Jordan and he is going to take call Linda and get going on the paper work. I think I am going to come back to Calgary September 6-7 to finalize everything. There is an Enron Canada offsite in Banff that weekend (Sept 7-9) that I should go to. Thanx again for all your help this weekend.

Chris


Jeff told me you are looking for the historicals for Cinergy and ComEd. This
is a change, for once you are the one looking for the numbers!

 I have attached the Cinergy for you. The ComEd and Cinergy Feb. I will send
to you a little later.

Ellen Clardy, Ph.D.
Power Markets Analyst
TradersNews
713/647-6603
ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com

 - Cin August.zip
 - Cin September.zip
 - AEP October.zip
 - AEP November.zip
 - Cin January.zip


Attached is the presentation and speech notes that Ken Lay used on Wednesday
at the Austin meeting with Bush, etc.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001 10:18 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Julie Brewer @ ENRON                           04/02/2001 09:58 AM

To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kara L Boudreau/HOU/ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Royed/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luchas
Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Nelson/Corp/Enron, Stewart Range/NA/Enron, Shifali Sharma/NA/Enron, Keynan
Dutton/NA/Enron, Carole Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Veronica Hill/NA/Enron, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, George Huan/NA/Enron,
Amy Cavazos/NA/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan
O'Rourke/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane
Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Rebooks

If your name is in the right hand column, please rebook as indicated by
credit.


One of my partners, David Schrader, was opposite Joe Dunn for four years in
litigation in Southern California.  He tells me that Joe's strength is his
presentation -- low key, sincere, effective in deposition, good with Judges.
However, he is not rated as being all that smart.  He still maintains an
office with Mark Robinson, a prominent heavy hitter plaintiffs' lawyer in
Southern California.  During this litigation, he was the coordinating
counsel for the plaintiffs in the breast implant litigation.  Thus, he is
very well connected to the plaintiffs bar and they probably funded part of
his campaign.  David believes that Dunn aspires to higher offices.

One other partner, Greg Williams, reports that he knows Joe Dunn very well.
I will report as soon as I have spoken with  him.

Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001
01:13 PM ---------------------------

"Tom Broderick" <tbroderi@czn.com> on 04/27/2001 12:54:37 PM
To: <tori.kuykendall@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: todays deal

please confirm this is correct on volumes and  pricing
 - Quote VVMed 04-27-01.xls


The U.S. needs to establish a very, very strong ground troop presence in Afghanistan as soon as possible. Until we accomplish this, we will not win over the Afghan people who would like to be rid of the Taliban. As of today, defection is very risky and maybe almost impossible. We need bases of operation in more than one area of the country. The logistics of feeding and sheltering and supplying these troops may be difficult but not impossible. The Afghan people need our support on the ground if they are going to rise up against the Taliban.

We are currently losing the media war. If our ground troops were hailed as liberators by the Afghan people and that was broadcast all over the world, we would start winning the war of words.

We must control ground very soon. There will be casualties on our side and the American people must prepare themselves mentally. We are fighting a ruthless, brutal enemy. Our resolve must increase, not diminish, when images of our casualties begin to come across our television screens. We must take down the Taliban and Bin Laden and other terrorists around the globe or face more attacks and loss of life in the United States.

Paul

Houston, TX


energyjobsnetwork.com