print first attachment only
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 10:15 AM -----

	Janet Butler
	10/13/2000 03:59 PM

		 To: Daniel Allegretti/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Aron/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
nancy.bagot@enron.com, John Ballentine/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eric Benson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Bily/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jack
Boatman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Theresa
Branney/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christi Culwell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sharon Farrell/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron, Lou
Geiler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Robert
Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Bambi
Heckerman/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Theresa Hess/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Staci Holtzman/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee
Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha Janousek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Anne Jolibois/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tim Kissner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura
Lantefield/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda L Lawrence/HOU/EES@EES, Blair
Lichtenwalter/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Teb
Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES,
Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, michael.moran@enron.com, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ranelle
Paladino/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Maureen Palmer/HOU/EES@EES, Zelda
Paschal/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Geneva Patterson/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Eileen Peebles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Phillips/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Colleen
Raker/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jenny
Rub/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Sawyer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Scott/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike G
Smith/NA/Enron@Enron, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lon
Stanton/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, James
Studebaker/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Edith
Terry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Debbie Thompson/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Denis Tu/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael Van Norden/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Veatch/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Donald Vignaroli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jody
Warner/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Watson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Amber
White/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jane.Wilson@enron.com, Michele
Winckowski/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Weekly Regulatory and Government Affairs Report

Attached is the weekly report for week ending October 13.

Also attached is the Order 637 Update.

Lastly, is the notice for Electronic Filings.


Any interest?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/21/2001 03:26 PM -----

	Brian Medd-Sygrove <Brian.Medd-Sygrove@houston.mail.fco.gov.uk>
	01/19/2001 12:11 PM

		 To: "'skean@enron.com'" <skean@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: UK Technology Forum

Dear Steven,

You have very kindly directed us in the right direction before.

Derek (Goodwin) has asked me to contact you. Derek is organizing a UK
Technology Forum on behalf of the Houston British Consulate General &
Invest.UK offices to be held in Houston in March. The purpose of which is to
foster & strengthen links between the technology-driven communities of
Houston & the UK. BT will showcase the leading-edge technology
infrastructure in the UK and a British Consulate General/Invest.UK speaker
will outline of the resources available to facilitate business expansion to
the UK.

The Forum will take the form of a breakfast & include the welcome &
introduction of a keynote speaker and a panel of 3 other speakers from
Houston based technology companies that have set-up an operation in the UK.
The panelists will give a brief overview of the why's & wherefor's behind
their decision to locate in the UK. The Forum will conclude with a moderated
Q&A session.

As Houston is a fast growing high-tech city, especially in the energy
sector, Derek has asked if you can refer him to the right person within
Enron with whom he can speak regarding Enron's possible involvement in the
Forum.

We'd appreciate any help you can give.

Sincerely,

Brian Medd-Sygrove
Vice Consul (Investment)
Invest.UK
British Consulate General
1000 Louisiana, Suite 1900
Houston Texas 77002
713 659 6275 Ext 42

 - EXCHANGE(SE).RA-ATT


For your followup and confirmation.
thanks,m
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
09:52 AM ---------------------------

christine.krumbholz@eds.com on 01/06/2001 02:49:13 PM
To: mike.mcconnell@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Super Bowl Registration

Thank you for submitting your registration for the EDS Super Bowl
XXXV event. We look forward to seeing you in sunny Florida!

Sincerely,
Christine Krumbholz
EDS

Attendee Information
--------------------
Prefix:   Mr.
Name:     Mike McConnell
Badge Name: Mike McConnell
Company:  Enron Global Markets
Email:    mike.mcconnell@enron.com
Address:  1400 Smith Street
City:     Houston
State:    Texas
Zip Code: 77002
Phone:    713-853-1450
Fax:      713-853-1922
Method:   Fax
Relation:
Jacket:   Medium
Shirt:    Large

Attendee's Guest
----------------
Name:   Chris McConnell
Badge Name: Chris McConnell
Relation: spouse
Jacket: Medium
Shirt:  Medium

Hotel Information
-----------------
Hard Rock:     Y
Check-In:
Check-Out:
Special Needs:

Activities
---------
Activity Selection:
        Friday, 26 January:
        Saturday, 27 January: Universal Studios
Guest's Activity Selections:
        Friday, 26 January:
        Saturday, 27 January: Universal Studios

Special Occassion
----------------


Another suggestion would be to carve-out specific issues for
discussion/research by smaller working groups who could report back to the
larger group on their conclusions.  This might make the larger group
discussions more manageable without limiting people's opportunity to
participate.  Just a suggestion.

	Wayne Gardner@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	01/24/2001 12:03 PM

		 To: Jan Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT@ENRON
		 cc: Alisa Christensen/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Angie
Buis/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Beth Wapner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Carolyn Barrett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Cynthia Harkness/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David DeGabriele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Derenda Plunkett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Donald Lassere/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gerry Willis/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jan
Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen Noble/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Malini Mallikarjun/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT@ENRON, Michael
Grimes/AP/Enron@Enron, Michael
Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT@ENRON, Michelle Hicks/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT@ENRON, Rajen
Shah/LON/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Richard Anderson/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue
Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Xi Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: TAR&L MEETINGS, 1/25, 2/1 & 2/8

Jan,
I agree that the meetings are too large.  However, I think it is imperative
that each discipline be represented in the meeting.  To that end, I would ask
that each of Accounting, Regulatory and Legal send no more than two
representatives to participate in the TARL meeting in Houston.  A commercial
person should attend as well.  The only exception to this rule should be a
temporary exception for you and Mike to call in, with other exceptions to be
made as hot issues arise.

Angie will see what she can do about arranging a videoconference but does not
make any promises, as any type of conference room is difficult to find these
days.

Minutes would be great.  Given that the most recent TARL meeting was entirely
about your area of responsibility, we volunteer you to write those minutes.

Thanks.

W. Wayne Gardner
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX  77002-7361
Phone:  713 853 3547
Fax:  713 646 2532

	Jan Haizmann@ECT
	24/01/2001 07:57

		 To: Angie Buis/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
		 cc: Alisa Christensen/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, James
Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Beth Wapner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David DeGabriele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Richard Anderson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rajen Shah/LON/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Derenda Plunkett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Donald Lassere/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gerry Willis/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jan Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Malini
Mallikarjun/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle Hicks/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Michael Grimes/AP/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
Barrett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Wayne Gardner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kathleen Noble/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: TAR&L MEETINGS, 1/25, 2/1 & 2/8

Dear all:

Following my experience of the last meeting, my feeling is that we need more
to focus on some items instead of having ever expanding discussions. I am in
favour of having smaller meetings instead of big cometogethers. I thing that
meeting should focus on two or three subjects and having smaller teams to
work out solutions on specified tasks. I also think that we can achieve
better time efficiency without losing the learning effect of discussing.

A second point would be my preference to have you on the screen. In
particular for those dialling in from abroad, it would be helpful in order to
better follow the discussion.

Lastly, I wonder whether it would not be useful to have short minutes of
every meeting for those who did not succeed in participating.

Let me have your thoughts on these suggestions.

Jan

ANGIE BUIS@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
22/01/2001 20:57
To: Alisa Christensen/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, James
Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Beth Wapner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David DeGabriele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Richard Anderson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Rajen Shah/LON/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Derenda Plunkett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Donald Lassere/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gerry Willis/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jan Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Malini
Mallikarjun/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael
Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michelle Hicks/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Michael Grimes/AP/Enron@Enron, Carolyn
Barrett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Wayne Gardner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kathleen
Noble/Enron Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: TAR&L MEETINGS, 1/25, 2/1 & 2/8

I have reserved conference room EB 4325 for the next 3 TAR&L meetings (1/25,
2/1 & 2/8).  The meeting will run from 8:30 to 11:30 and a light breakfast
will be served.

The dial in number for these next 3 meetings is as follows:

International Participants: 1-805-240-9463, passcode 449834
Domestic Participants:  1-888-232-3866. passcode 449834

Host (Wayne):   1-888-232-3866, passcode 860073 (host only)

There are a total of seven ports and automatic port expansion should
additional parties wish to join in.  All that is necessary is to dial the
appropriate number above.

Should you have any questions, or need additional assistance, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 713-853-7097.

Thanks!

Angie Buis
EBS Tax
(713) 853-7097


Melissa -
I think we've finally reached a conclusion on the long term PX Index deals.
I've entered the following comment in the six deals still in the system with
Constellation at the old index:

Constellation and EPMI have agreed to leave deal at PX Index. Counterparties'
positions tie out - index price should not be relevant; however, index offset
will. Per Bob Badeer, 4/18/01. KS

This is exactly how Bob explained it to me, and he said it was exactly as
Constellation understood it as well. So if this sounds good to you, I think
we're set. If not, please let me know and we can make whatever changes are
necessary.

The deal numbers, for reference, are -
453152/453175/453294/462109/471888/471889

Thanks for your patience on this,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
04/17/2001 11:02 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hello, I guess if he wants to leave the deals as they are in the system then
the accounting group will see zero for an index price and they will see the
index off set price.  If he and Constellation both agree to do nothing to
these trades (not to revise the confirms or change the index on the trades)
then we can put notes in the trades explaining that.  I just want to make
sure that Constellation agrees with however we handle this.

Thanks for your help,
Melissa

   Kate Symes                04/17/2001 12:28 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Constellation Cal Px trades

I asked Bob about these this morning, and he said he's still got to work this
out with Constellation. The way he explained it, our position is flat with
Constellation, so for settlements purposes we're okay - i.e. We've bought the
same volumes that we've sold, and we end up losing a bit due to the index
offset - but otherwise the index price won't make a difference.  But I
suspect he's not thinking of the problem from the confirmation standpoint.
Could you tell me exactly what needs to happen to clear this up on your end
so that I can explain it to Bob in a way that might make him DO something?
I'm sorry for the delay on this - I'm getting ready to call Bob's contact at
Constellation for him.

Let me know what your ideal solution would be. Should we get Constellation to
agree to the Dow Jones index? Or should we change the deals to forward fixed
price? We'll fix this today - I promise.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
04/17/2001 08:12 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hello, any news on these Constellation Cal PX trades?
Thanks,
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001
09:06 AM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                03/30/2001 12:57 PM

To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Constellation Cal Px trades

I just talked to Bob, and I don't know if he's responded yet, but I thought
I'd fill you in anyway. He's been talking to his contact at Constellation
about changing these deals over, but hasn't received a concrete answer yet.
I've reminded him and he said he WILL talk to the guy and resolve it today.
I'll keep on it, and let you know when these deals have been changed.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/29/2001 11:13 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hello, I hate to bug you with this.  Whenever you can spare a second would
you ask Bob about this?  I am afraid it is going to slip through the cracks.

Thanks for your help!
Melissa
---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/26/2001 10:34 AM
To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Constellation Cal Px trades

Hi Bob, I was wondering if you have contacted Constellation about the 6
trades that are in the system with the Cal Px as the index price.  All of
these trades start flowing in July of this year.

The deal numbers are as follows:

453152.01
453175.01
453294.01
462109.01
471888.01
471889.01

Let me know if Constellation agrees to change these deals to the Dow Jones so
I can send a letter for them to sign.

Thanks,
Melissa


i will pick you up around 7:30-8.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:41 AM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i told you, i'm not getting you a xmas present anymore.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:22 AM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

of course i do.  i want to see my sweet baby.  how was your day off.  did
you buy me an xmas gift?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:05 AM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   yeah do you?

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Lenhart, Matthew [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:50 AM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject:

   do you still want to go out tonight?

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


I shuffled the storage deal tickets (deal 268090 and 268093) around for
June.  We are injecting more gas at the beginning of the month and less in
the end of the month.

On Tuesday, our net injection goes to 29,687 dth.
On Sat, 19th, our net injection drops to 2,204 dth.

This keeps us at our 60% max storage balance on 6/30/2000.


RSVP to Zulie per SB.......cv


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:10:30 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "Alfredo Perez" <aperez@bracepatt.com>, "Andrea Settanni"
<asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Ingebretson"
<cingebretson@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com>,
"Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Gene Godley" <ggodley@bracepatt.com>, "Kimberly
Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com>, "Mark Evans" <mevans@bracepatt.com>, "Michael
Pate" <mpate@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Potential Bankruptcy Petition Against SCE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline

Generator to sign bankruptcy filing
Report says Coram to sign petition against SoCalEd
By Myra P. Saefong, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 6:43 PM ET Mar 15, 2001

TEHACHAPI, Calif. (CBS.MW) -- Independent electricity generator Coram Energy
Group said it will sign a bankruptcy petition Thursday against Southern
California Edison, according to a published report.

The petition is being circulated among five other "qualifying facilities,"
also known as small generating plants, Coram owner Brian O'Sullivan told Dow
Jones Newswires.

O'Sullivan said his company is running out of cash and will have to shut down
operations in about a month, according to the report. Coram Energy, which was
one of several renewable power generators that formed a creditors' committee
in February, produces wind energy at three locations in Tehachapi, Calif.

The petition could be filed in a Los Angeles bankruptcy court as early as
next week, the report said. The move could prompt the start of involuntary
bankruptcy proceedings against the utility owned by Edison International
(EIX: news, msgs, alerts) .

The report also said FPL Group (FPL: news, msgs, alerts) , owner of several
qualifying facilities in SoCal Edison's area, may also join the group.

Southern California Edison and another of California's big utilities, Pacific
Gas & Electric (PCG: news, msgs, alerts) , have combined debts of more than
$13 billion. Both suffer from having to pay high wholesale power prices to
supply electricity to their customers who pay retail rates capped by state
regulators below actual costs.

Myra P. Saefong is a reporter for CBS.MarketWatch.com in San Francisco.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/02/2000 10:04
AM ---------------------------
From: Barbara N Gray@ECT on 11/02/2000 10:01 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: E-MAIL ADDRESS

Kay, could you please have your assistant get your name and E-Mail address
moved into the "ECT Adress Book" rather than the ENRON Corp Address book.  If
there is a specific need for you to remain in the Enron Corp address
directory, please let me know.     Thanks bng


---------------------- Forwarded by Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------

mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com on 01/31/2000 03:46:00 PM
To: Phillip Villagomez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "        -         *Bartlo, Noel" <nbartlo@columbiaenergygroup.com>,
"        -         *Jones, Donna" <djones1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, "
-         *Flewellyn, Melissa" <mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>, "
-         *Perrone, Brian" <bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>, "
-         *Swogger, Joanne" <jswogge@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: Tennesse Zn 6

An afterthought here..... I should have used the term displacement, as we
would
not be officially bringing in more gas into their system.
---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas on
01/31/2000 04:43 PM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
01/31/2000 04:27 PM

To: cgarcia@enron.com@internet, phillip.villagomez@enron.com@internet
cc: Joanne Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Melissa
Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Donna
Jones/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: Tennesse Zn 6

Need your assistance.   Obviously I need your expertise on Tennessee (and
someone's on Transco).   We need to get gas to S. Ct. and Ct. Natural
citygates
for February.

Here's a what if...........I just spoke with a Tennessee rep to ask about
Transco Rivervale and Tennessee.   They are currently allowing short hauls at
this point.     However,  could we bring in some Transco at Rivervale and do a
short haul on Tennessee Mawaw (spelling)?   As of today I was told it could
flow to the above citygate meters.   (although this could change overnight).
I know we did this a few times last winter also.

How does Transco look for this?    As you can tell I am not even aware of the
economics.   If this would work what would it cost?  Can you check with Chris
(I don't know his e-mail address)?


Kimat, this is the offset to the big gain we made on CGAS last night on that
one deal.  I increased our sales volume on deal. 502957 by 10,000dth/day
starting on the 19th.  Deal 502957 is a citygate, index based sale and we
should show a big loss on it tonite.


Thanks to all of you for your help with this.  Made my participation practically effortless, and more important, alot of fun.  Great job.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Malone, Laurie
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 8:30 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:	Schwarz, Angela; Schwartz, Laura; Glasin, Shirleen; Mahoney, Peggy
Subject:	RE: ICSC conference

Jeff: Thanks again for joining for the conference. I was actually very busy with folks there through the breakfast meeting Saturday am (had one particularly hostile attendee to that) and then on through Saturday afternoon- questions, questions, questions so I would say our attendance was definitely worthwhile. Your insight and provacative discussion provided an excellent framework for the business case we were trying to communicate. If I can ever be of any assistance to you, please feel free to call me. When I meet folks like you, it just reinforces my commitment to the great people we work with and the great company we work for. Thanks, Laurie


Here is the clean and red-lined version of section 1.
Ben


Linda:
I understand that Stacy will be coordinating with you tomorrow to get this
completed.  When it is done, I need for you to fax it to Harry Stout
(713-877-8006(phone))(713-877-1394 (Fax)) and Zachary May (212-310-8000 -
phone)(212-310-8007 - fax).  Thanks.

Carol


Maureen --

Thanks for being so patient with me.

Jim


Does anyone object to Wednesday, at 2:00 p.m., Carol's office? (Conference
rooms are both booked.)

	Carol St Clair
	05/23/2000 01:56 PM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Work Flows Meeting

Susan and Susan:
In an effort to better manage your work flows, Sara and I would like to meet
with you for about 30 minutes this week to get an idea of what's on your
plate and what we can do to ease the work load.  Could you please give this
some thought and let Taffy know when you want to meet so she can get it set
up?  Thanks.
Carol


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
04:09 PM ---------------------------

"Richard MacMinn" <macminnr@uts.cc.utexas.edu> on 10/30/2000 06:25:54 PM
Please respond to <macminnr@uts.cc.utexas.edu>
To: "Vince Kaminski" <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
cc:
Subject: 06200001 Long-Term Value at Risk

Dear Vince

I hope you are well and prospering at Enron.  I'm still suffering from
culture shock here.  I know that you have an interest and expertise in value
at risk and so I hope that you will be able to complete the review on the
manuscript that we sent to you very soon.  Please advise.

Sincerely
Richard

Professor Richard MacMinn, Editor
The Journal of Risk and Insurance
The Swiss Re Chair in the Management of Risk
Centre for Risk and Insurance Studies
Nottingham University Business School
Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road
Nottingham, NG8 1BB
United Kingdom

JRI Office: +1 512 471-0018
Nottingham Office: +44 (0)115 846-6679
eFax: +1 305 768-0522

Journal: mailto:jri1@uts.cc.utexas.edu
Editor:  mailto:macminnr@uts.cc.utexas.edu
Other: mailto:richard.macminn@nottingham.ac.uk

JRI: http://www.aria.org/jri/
Editor: http://macminnrd.bus.utexas.edu:83/
Vita: http://home.austin.rr.com/macminn/

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do
nothing. Edmund Burke

 - winmail.dat


Sally, I was planning on going home tomorrow but Peggy just informed me that she was coming down on Monday and Tuesday to discuss settlements and risk.  Do you think I should plan on being here for that also?


FYI.  Rep Dan Burton's House "Government Reform" committee is touring
California to get info on CA's energy crisis. Yesterday, they met in
Sacramento.  Today, there in San Jose (Edison, PG&E and some Silicon Valley
businesses are witnesses), and tomorrow they're in San Diego.  The hearing
was widely covered on local TV news.  As the following story reflects, it was
very partisan.

	Political shots traded at U.S. power inquiry
	By John Hill
Bee Capitol Bureau
(Published April 11, 2001)
	It was billed as a nonpartisan inquiry into the roots of California's energy
crisis.
	"We're not here to assign blame," Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., said Tuesday at a
hearing in Sacramento of a House subcommittee. "We're not here to point
fingers. We're here to listen and learn."
	But by the end, blame had been doled out in heaping portions and the fingers
had come out of their holsters.
	Rep. Doug Ose, the Sacramento Republican who is chairman of the panel,
blasted Gov. Gray Davis, a Democrat, for keeping secret the details of the
state's long-term electricity contracts. He raised the possibility of issuing
subpoenas.
	So did Burton, who sharply questioned Loretta Lynch, president of the
California Public Utilities Commission, about whether the commission
prevented investor-owned utilities from signing long-term contracts for cheap
electricity. Lynch was appointed to the commission by Davis.
	Lynch said the utilities were given permission and did sign contracts, but
declined to give details, saying she was legally barred from doing so.
	"We represent the Congress of the United States," Burton fired back. "We want
that information."
	The panel of the House Committee on Government Reform consists of 13 members,
but only three attended, all of them Republicans -- Ose, Burton and Rep.
Steve Horn of Long Beach.
	All 13 were invited, as well as members of Congress whose districts are being
visited by the subcommittee, which also plans to hold hearings this week in
San Jose and San Diego.
	"I'm frankly surprised they're not here," said Yier Shi, a spokesman for the
subcommittee. "This is a bipartisan issue."
	But if Democrats weren't on the podium, some were in the audience, including
state party campaign adviser Bob Mulholland. He called the hearing "a
Republican sham to protect the Texas energy companies," and circulated quotes
from former Gov. Pete Wilson, a Republican, praising the legislation that
created deregulation.
	Much of the testimony focused on whether the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission should impose price caps on wholesale electricity prices.
	Lynch said it was the only way to impose rationality on a "dysfunctional
market" in which electricity generators and marketers are free to drive up
prices far beyond what they would be in a competitive market.
	Others, including FERC's general counsel, Kevin Madden, called caps a bad
idea that would encourage sellers to go elsewhere, reducing California's
power supply. Madden also said a cap imposed by FERC would only cover about
half the power bought and sold in the West.

The Bee's John Hill can be reached at (916) 326-5543 or


The New Options Model meeting will be held in EB3125b.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001
04:34 PM ---------------------------

Tamara Jae Black
05/22/2001 04:21 PM
To: Rudy Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana Allen/Enron@EnronXGate, Russell
Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Ted Ballinger/Enron@EnronXGate, Don
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/Enron@EnronXGate, Corry
Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Benson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tamara Jae
Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Burnett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul J
Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry F
Campbell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jason
Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Cline/Enron@EnronXGate, Terri
Clynes/Enron@EnronXGate, Keith Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karla
Compean/Enron@EnronXGate, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Oscar
Dalton/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clint
Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, George Diaz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Dorland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Miguel L
Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gerald Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug
Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gautam Gupta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juan Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rika Imai/Enron@EnronXGate, Larry
Jester/Enron@EnronXGate, Gary Justice/Enron@EnronXGate, Mike E
Kelly/Enron@EnronXGate, Grace Kim/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff
King/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Madhup
Kumar/Enron@EnronXGate, Dean Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin
Laverell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matt
Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretchen Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Narsimha Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andy
Pace/Enron@EnronXGate, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Laura
Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Quenet/NA/Enron@Enron,
David Ryan/Enron@EnronXGate, Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anna
Santucci/Enron@EnronXGate, sscott3@enron.com, Erik Serio/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Doug Sewell/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Shoemake/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert
Stalford/NA/Enron@Enron, Chad Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe
Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Symms/Enron@EnronXGate, Ramanarao
Tamma/Enron@EnronXGate, Garrett Tripp/TOR/ECT@ECT, Larry
Valderrama/Enron@EnronXGate, Maria Valdes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joseph
Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher Watts/NA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd
Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Smith L Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/NA/Enron@Enron, Andy
Rodriquez/Enron@EnronXGate, Claudia Guerra/Enron@EnronXGate, Benjamin
Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Vernon/Enron@EnronXGate, Fletcher J
Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mauricio Trejo/Enron@EnronXGate, Dustin
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Abler/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve
Wang/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: New Options Model

---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001
04:18 PM ---------------------------
From: Steve Wang/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/22/2001 04:17 PM
To: Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Options Model

Meeting on May 30 at 3:30pm regarding the new Option Model we (Steve Wang,
Harry Arora, and Rob Stalford) use to make markets.  The old structuring
model was created for marketer to give indicative pricing.  I have created
this model especially for option market making.  As market makers we found
the old model too slow as we are often making bid/offers in more than five
strikes in more than five different months.  This model allows us to make our
markets quicker and identify mispricings in the market before our
competitors.  This is not to replace the old structuring model.  It is only a
complement that will give everyone a better picture of where options are
trading and where bid/offers are.  We will publish these prices weekly and
will eventually have them on a daily basis.

You will need special permission to access the files located in
M:\power2\Options.  Let me know if you want access to this folder.  The
following people already have access:

Ahn, Christopher
Ballato, Russell
Baughman, Ed
Benson, Rob
Broderick, Paul
Carson, Mike
Clynes, Terri
Curry, Mike
Dalton, Oscar
Davis, Dana
Dean, Clint
Dorland, Chris
Forney, John
Gilbert-Smith, Doug
Gupta, Gautam
Jester, Larry
Kelly, Michael
King, Jeff
Lorenz, Matt
Presto, Kevin
Quenet, Joe
Scheuer, Janelle
Sewell, Robert (Doug)
Sturm, Fletch
Tingleaf, Drew
Valderrama, Larry
Valdes, Maria
Wheeler, Raymond

Thanks
Steve Wang


SDG&E filed a Complaint with the FERC that requests an "emergency order
capping at $250 per MWh the prices" for all parties selling into the Calif
ISO and the Calif PX.   SDG&E claims that the Calif ISO and the Calif PX are
"fundamentally flawed and inherently incapable of producing workable
competition".

EPMI is directly impacted by this Complaint.   Even though FERC has approved
EPMI's Market-Based Rate certificate after a finding that we had no market
power, this Complaint would restrict us from selling at above $250 per MWh
into the Calif ISO and Calif PX.

Government Affairs is responding in two ways --

1. A direct response from EPMI to FERC responding that there has been no
finding that EPMI has market power and therefore we should not lose our
market-based rate authority.

2. A response through WPTF (Western Power Trading Forum) and EPSA to argue
more broadly the facts of what is going on in California (bad hedging by
SDG&E) and poor market structure rules.

The fundamental problem is that the FERC is running scared about price spikes
and may, without any real thinking, approve such a Complaint.  SDG&E has
asked for expedited treatment and a decision could be out as early as mid
August.

This issue again highlights how important the on-going FERC Investigation in
Market Issues is for Enron.  We are putting together a detailed plan of how
Enron will present our recommendations to FERC in this Investigation and will
discuss this with you.

Call with questions.

Thanks,

Jim


All,

I told Mike Tully that I was here last nite when RT couldn't run the report,
but I could from my desk.  I explained to him the problems your group has
been having with this report.  I'm going to see if the RT guys (Monica and
Collin) can run a report today (per Mike's suggestion - to see if it's
possibly a day/nite thing).   I told Mike we'll monitor this prob for a while
to see if it gets better or worse.  In the interim, it's important to send an
email to Dave Poston and Mike Tully (and copy me)everytime you have trouble
running or printing the report.   Please be as specific as possible in your
emails.  It sounds like it may be hard to pinpoint the cause of these
problems, so I want to start accumulating as much documentation as possible
for support.
---------------------- Forwarded by D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
09:46 AM ---------------------------

Michael Tully
11/30/2000 08:46 AM
To: David Poston/PDX/ECT@ECT, D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: EnPower to PX Report

Ran This Morning Fine Twice

Michael Tully

David Poston
11/30/2000 07:00 AM
To: Michael Tully/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EnPower to PX Report

There were some problems with the server last night (r: drive).  Can you
rerun the report and see if it works now?  The report is pulling Oracle data
from Enpower which works fine but it seems to have an issue finding the
caps.mdb.  It must be an infrastructure problem.

Thanks, Poston

---------------------- Forwarded by David Poston/PDX/ECT on 11/30/2000 07:05
AM ---------------------------

Jesse Bryson
11/30/2000 01:45 AM
To: David Poston/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: EnPower to PX Report

The Enpower to PX Report is not pulling in the Caps deals.  The enpower part
is fine but there is nothing for caps. We obviously have a huge variance when
this occurs.......  Do you have any idea what might be causing this error?

Cheers
Jesse


FYI
----- Forwarded by Pat Radford/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 08:37 AM -----

	Becky Tlucek
	09/13/2000 10:13 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Twanda
Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Legal Temp 1/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Lexis Training

ENA Assistants:  Please let your assignments know that this training is
available if they are interested.  Thank you!-Becky

---------------------------------------------
On popular demand, Sylvia Hu has arranged to have Ed Chang, Lexis Corporate
Attorney back to Enron to do a presentation on "How to Search Public Records
on Lexis".  He'll also brief us on new features of Lexis.com.   Please see
the attached flyer for details.

Come see Certifinder & Company Dossier
LEXIS-NEXIS EASY SEARCH PAGES

Lexis Public Records Training
Date:   Wednesday, 9/27
Time:   11:30 Am - 1:00 PM
Place:   Conference Room EB47C2
Lunch will be provided by Lexis.
R.S.V.P. to Sylvia Hu x36775 by Noon, 9/26

 - enronpubrec.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000
05:12 PM ---------------------------

Ramon Rodriguez@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/14/2000 11:44 PM
To: Maureen Raymond@ECT
cc: James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vijay
Sethu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lian
Ji/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jim
Cole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jirayut
Rungsrithong/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Dragon Curves

Maureen,

We are currently in the RAC process for Dragon, and I understand RAC has
requested updated curves.  We are currently using the following country
curves you provided previously:

1)  Philippines:  90700

2)  Thailand:  51500

3)  Korea:  62300

4)  China:  50900

5)  Taiwan:  20800

6)  US:   81700

I agree in principal with the methodology and understand the approach, given
the info you have.  However, you have just provided a new curve for Thailand,
which, was just provided to us in May.  Given the methodolgy you explained
earlier, I find it hard to believe we would see such a huge impact (35%
decrease on a 25 year PV basis) on our COCO valuation (Thai project).

It appears that this Thai curve is not using PPP, and I'm not saying your
analysis has to be PPP, but most would expect that given the varying economic
environments and market places we deal with, PPP is a widely accepted
practice/method, as we cannot predict the future.  Please provide us a
detailed reconcilation among the two curves and the Country rational in
coming up with the revised curves from 4 months ago.

Please contact me if you have any questions at 011-852-2588-1234.

Regards,

Ramon


TOWNSEND, JUDITH G,
?
You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance
Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process,
and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance
Management goals.
?
To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and
select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing
feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed
by Friday, May 25, 2001.
?
If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the
process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com
?
Thank you for your participation in this important process.
?
The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a
status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request
for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL
RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.
?
Employee Name:
FLETCHER, BRENDA
SINGLA, KIMAT


Greg,

Gerald and I went over the document once more this morning and he has
approved it for your further handling.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
----- Forwarded by Eric Gillaspie/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 10:15 AM -----

	Eric Gillaspie
	01/26/2001 03:41 PM

		 To: Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, James R Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Rio Nogales ICA

Greg,

Attached for your review is the Interconnect Agreement with Rio Nogales
incorporating the changes from the recent meeting.  Gerald is out this
afternoon and has not yet signed off on this document.  I'll let you know
when he approves it on Monday.  Have a good weekend.


Let me know if you have any questions or need anything changed.

Thanks,
Lindy
X36007


I think this will change a bit, but it gives you some history.


Any changes to the attached please let me know.

Rgds,

Karen.
x54667


[IMAGE]
 Battle your friends for glory in Planters Crunch Time -- the first-ever football game played via e-mail! Featuring graphic, play-by-play action, Planters Crunch Time is fast, fun, and FREE! Kickoff Now!   Remember the NFL Hall of Famer's, Superbowl Champs and your favorite Teams or Players. Save 10%  off NFL Memorabilia @ MVP.com. Enter coupon code HIGH10PC  at checkout to receive this exclusive offer. Ends 10/23/01.  Attention Fantasy Fans!  Subscribe to The Sporting News  now for a low $.99 per issue AND get a FREE Stainless Steel Thermo-Bottle! HURRY!    Brought to you by   Sponsorship Bar You are receiving these e-reports because you have signed up for CBS SportsLine.com Fantasy Football.  To customize, reschedule, or turn off these reports please  click here    Player Updates NFL Reports  [IMAGE]Latest NFL Player News  Todd Heap , TE BAL - Free Agent Updated 10/18/01 Heap practiced Wednesday but remains questionable for Sunday's game at Cleveland. Reserve Heap on your roster this week. It would be wise to keep him inactive until he is effective in a game.   Jeff Garcia , QB SF - The Guzzlers Updated 10/18/01 According to published reports, Garcia has been instructed not to pick up a football until the Niners begin practicing again next week. Garcia is dealing with a sore throwing elbow,! a! s well as a few other nagging bumps and bruises. However, he's still expected to start in the 49ers' next game on Oct. 28 against Chicago.   Peerless Price , WR BUF - The Lie Downs Updated 10/18/01 Price might post respectable numbers against the Jaguars. Jacksonville's secondary is thin because of injuries.  Eric Moulds , WR BUF - Who's Yo Daddy Updated 10/18/01 Moulds might get in the end zone against Jacksonville. Look for the Bills to move him around often against the injury-riddled Jaguars secondary.  Larry Centers , RB BUF -! T! he Guzzlers Updated 10/18/01 Centers has been Buffalo's most reliable receiver so far, but that trend might change against Jacksonville. Buffalo might look to attack an injury-riddled Jaguars secondary with passes to WR Peerless Price and TE Jay Riemersma.  Drew Bledsoe , QB NE - The Executioners Updated 10/18/01 There's a very slim chance Bledsoe will be in uniform as the emergency quarterback this week .     Bledsoe was upgraded from "out" to "doubtful" on the injury report, but he's lost 15 pounds and hasn't been cleared to run, throw or be hit. He has pedaled a stationary bicycle and probably would just hand off the ball if Brady and No. 2 quarterback Damon Huard are sidelined.   Bledsoe's progress has been slower than he hoped and there's no timetable for his return.   !   Tyrone Wheatley , RB OAK - One Man Show Updated 10/18/01 Wheatley won't practice during the team's week off and could possibly miss the next game because of an injured right knee.          "Tyrone Wheatley has a second degree - I don't know if it's a sprain or a tear - of his MCL,"' coach Jon Gruden said Wednesday.   Gruden called Wheatley questionable for the Oct. 28 game at Philadelphia. He said he would learn more about the injury as the week progressed.   He disputed reports that Wheatley would be out four weeks.   "I would not agree with that at this time," Gruden said.     Chris Weinke , QB CAR - The Lie Downs Updated 10/18/01 Weinke sat out practice Wednesday and it's uncert! ai! n whether he will play in Washington on Sunday because of a thigh injury. The injury is more serious than the Panthers first expected. Seifert said Monday that Weinke had a deep thigh bruise, but expected him to practice Wednesday. Seifert said he didn't know if Weinke would practice Thursday. Dameyune Craig would start if Weinke cannot play.   Brian Griese , QB DEN - The Nice Machine Updated 10/18/01 Griese said Wednesday his sore shoulder has improved and he's confident he'll play Sunday against San Diego.   Griese complained of shoulder soreness after a hit against the Kansas City Chiefs on Oct. 7. The problem was aggravated Sunday when he was slammed to the turf by Seattle Seahawks defensive end Lamar King.   Tests Monday showed no structural damage to his shoulder.     Redskins , DT WAS - Free Agent Updated 10/17/01 Cornerback Champ Bailey missed practice on Wednesday due to a sprai! ne! d ankle, but he's expected to play on Sunday. Fred Smoot (leg), however, is in danger of missing this weekend's contest against Carolina. Darrell Green would replace Smoot if he's unable to go.   Rob Moore , WR ARI - Free Agent Updated 10/17/01 Moore (hamstring) is listed as probable for Sunday's game against Kansas City. He hasn't been full speed at practice, however, so don't be surprised if his status is downgraded over the next two days.   Patrick Jeffers , WR CAR - oops, I did it again Updated 10/17/01 Jeffers (knees) saw extensive work in practice today and may be ready to play this weekend against New Orleans. However, Jeffers is too risky to start from a Fantasy perspective.   Muhsin Muhammad , WR CAR - The Nice Machine Updated 10/17/01 Muhammad's ribs are still sore after taking a few shots during Sunday's game against New Orleans. Coach George Seifert expects him to play, but he may be somewhat limited. Unless his status improves by the end of the week, Fantasy owners may want to consider benching Muhammad if at all possible.   Chris Weinke , QB CAR - The Lie Downs Updated 10/17/01 Weinke missed practice on Wednesday due to a thigh injury. However, Head Coach George Seifert expects the rookie quarterback to start on Sunday against Washington. If you need a quarterback this week, Weinke is a good choice facing a terrible Redskins' defense. !  Terance Mathis , WR ATL - North Blvd Nutwhackers Updated 10/17/01 Mathis (hand) returned to practice on Wednesday. He is expected to start on Sunday against New Orleans, but he's only worth starting in deeper leagues from a Fantasy perspective.   Shawn Jefferson , WR ATL - Free Agent Updated 10/17/01 Jefferson (toe) returned to practice on Wednesday. He is expected to be in the starting lineup on Sunday against New Orleans, but he's too unreliable to use Fantasy-wise.   Ryan Leaf , QB DAL - Free Agent Updated 10/17/01!  Leaf worked with he first team offense during practice on Wednesday. He was filling in for Anthony Wright, who was given the day off to rest his swollen right knee. Leaf will have his chance to win the starting job in Dallas, but he has no real Fantasy value at this time.   Troy Hambrick , RB DAL - Free Agent Updated 10/17/01 Now that Robert Thomas is gone for the year, Hambrick is expected to become Dallas' starting fullback. He's shown flashes of brilliance at times, but his value as a Fantasy player is still minimal at this point.   Michael Bennett , RB MIN - The Fat Bastards Updated 10! /1! 7/01 Bennett is listed as doubtful for Sunday's game against Green Bay due to a right ankle injury. Expect Doug Chapman to get the start, with Travis Prentice serving as his backup. Don't use Bennett this week.  Randy Moss , WR MIN - Meximullets Updated 10/17/01 Moss is listed as questionable for Sunday's game against Green Bay with a right ankle injury. While we normally tell you to start him every week, this is one matchup we wouldn't activate him for unless it becomes completely clear he will start.  Shane Matthews , QB CHI - Free Agent Updated 10/17/01 The Bears re-signed Matthews on Tuesday. He returns to his old backup QB job and isn't worth adding to your Fantasy roster.  Terrell Davis , RB DEN - Meximullets Updated 10/17/01 According to published reports, Davis would like to return to the lineup Sunday at San Diego. He has recovered from a knee injury, and Broncos Head Coach Mike Shanahan wants him to return by November 4. We don't recommend you use Davis this week, although this development also makes it tough to recommend you start any Broncos running back.  Stacey Mack , RB JAC - Thrill Kill Cult Updated 10/17/01  Mack will get a lot of carries this week but don't expect him to be too productive. He only gained 17 yards on nine carries in the Jaguars' previous.   Keenan McCardell , WR JAC - One Man Show Updated 10/17/01 McCardell struggled in his first few games back from injury, but looked like his old self in the previous game. Look for McCardell to play well this week and catch a lot of passes.    Sean Dawkins , WR JAC - Free Agent Updated 10/17/01 Dawkins will have a tough time against Buffalo this week. He will catch of couple of passes but won't! f! ind his way into the end zone.   Mark Brunell , QB JAC - The Nice Machine Updated 10/17/01 Brunell is no longer being bothered by headaches and is expected to play in Week Six. Look for him to throw for over 200 yards and a score.     Kyle Brady , TE JAC - One Man Show Updated 10/17/01 Brady is expected to play in this week's game despite a hip injury, and is listed as probable. He won't be too productive if he does play. Brady only has five catches this season.   Jimmy Smith , WR JAC - North Blvd Nutwhackers Updated 10/17/01 Smith has been very consistent this season. Look for him to catch several passes and score a touchdown against Buffalo.  Herman Moore , WR DET - Free Agent Updated 10/17/01 Moore will miss the remainder of the season after tearing a muscle in his hip during Sunday's game at Minnesota. "We're disappointed the injury is much worse than we thought," Lions Head Coach Marty Mornhinweg said. "We believed it was a minor pull, but the MRI showed a significant tear in the muscle." Drop Moore if he was on your Fantasy team. Larry Foster assumes the No. 3 receiver job in Detroit.  ! Ty! rone Wheatley , RB OAK - One Man Show Updated 10/17/01 According to published reports, Wheatley will miss three to four weeks with a right knee sprain. The veteran back was beginning to lose carries to Charlie Garner before he was hurt.  More Updates  Player News Teams  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE] Select Team   [IMAGE]       [IMAGE] Please select a team above and click on GO.     [IMAGE]  Copyright 2001 Commissioner.COM Inc and SportsLine.com Inc. Your site can be reached from http://fantasy.sportsline.com   FB10SP


Did George refuse to sign?
Needs to be a reason for the loss - what is it ?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Abel, Chris
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 4:08 PM
To: Murphy, Ted; Port, David; Schultz, Cassandra; Shankman, Jeffrey A.;
Whalley, Greg
Cc: Wilson, Shona; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Hall, D. Todd; Price, Brent A.
Subject: 6/20/01 EOL Crude 5 Day Cumulative Loss

This is a notification that a 5 Day Cumulative Loss ocurred for EOL Crude
24/7 Trading on June 20, 2001 in the amount of $4.7 million.  The limit
established for EOL Crude is $3.75 million.

No signature is required on this notification.

Chris Abel
x33102


please distribute for your staff meeting
KH
---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron on 10/31/2000
12:37 PM ---------------------------

Jeffery Fawcett
10/27/2000 12:34 PM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron
Subject: Electric Developments

I consulted with Kevin before I took the oars in trying to answer your
question, as well as the questions raised in Drew's e-mail.  Here's what we
found out...

Steve's question:

What economics would determine if a developer could site a power plant in New
Mexico (maybe 3,000MW) and build a line to the grid in California versus us
expanding to deliver the gas to a power plant in California?

What you're really asking here is "What are the comparative economics of
energy delivered by wire versus energy delivered by pipeline?"  In this
analysis, there are a few considerations -- (1) original capital cost to
construct facilities, (2) the operating cost of the facilities, including
energy loss, and (3) environmental and other permitting considerations.

 Engineers tell us that, as a rule of thumb, high voltage transmission lines
and tower facilities cost approximately $800,000 to $1MM/mile to construct
turnkey.  This figure is comparable to the $1MM/mile "rule of thumb" we use
for turnkey construction of mainline diameter (30-36") high-pressure steel
pipeline.

In terms of operating costs, for anything over 100 miles in length, there are
three (3) basic sources of energy loss in electric transmission: (1)
transformation loss, (2) radiation loss (EFM) and (3) heat loss across the
conductors.  A rule of thumb for electric transmission loss is 3%.  This
number is comparable to the actual fuel used for compression on
Transwestern's pipeline.

The most critical issue impacting construction of high voltage transmission
lines is in the area of permitting.  There just aren't many new transmission
lines being approved.  It was suggested by more than one source that an
electric transmission project on the order posited in your example, could
take anywhere from 6 to 10 years to secure authorization.  The issues of
electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation around high voltage power lines, along
with other wildlife endangerment concerns, are significant obstacles in
securing permits for right-of-way.

In short, the answer is that while the economics on face appear to be
comparable for construction and operation of both natural gas pipelines and
electric transmission lines, the protracted permitting process for electric
transmission lines tips the scale considerably towards the more immediate
returns available on investment in natural gas pipeline infrastructure.

Drew's questions:

1. What are the key factors that determine where a power plant developer puts
his plant?

For purposes of this exercise, I'm assuming we're talking gas-fired
generation.  Developers generally describe four considerations in deciding
where to site a new electric power plant:
 1. Market area demand (distributive) and/or Transmission access to market
 2. Water rights for turbine cooling
 3. Ease of permitting (environmental, encroachment, fed/state/local
regulations, affected agencies/jurisdiction)
 4. Proximity to natural gas pipeline/supply infrastructure

2. Do the transmission access and pricing rules of the various
utilities/power pools vary all that much or are Order 888 tariffs pretty much
the same all over?

FERC Order 888 and 889 require public utilities to commit to standards of
conduct and to file open access tariffs affecting transmission among and
between other utilities and/or power pools in the various operating regions.
FERC ordered public utility transmission owners to provide transmission
access and comparable service to competitors and to functionally separate
their transmission/reliability functions from their wholesale merchant
functions. The rulemaking is analogous to the open access requirements under
FERC Order 436/500/636 affecting interstate natural gas pipelines.  It's
pretty obvious from the California example this past summer, that with
respect to the overall operation of a deregulated power market in individual
states, particularly as concerns the establishment and regulation of
Independent System Operators (ISO's), there is substantial room for
improvement (and possible further FERC involvement).

"In the open access final rule (Order No. 888), the Commission issues a
single pro forma tariff describing the minimum terms and conditions of
service to bring about this nondiscriminatory open access transmission
service.  All public utilities that own, control, or operate interstate
transmission facilities are required to offer service to others under the pro
forma tariff.  They must also use the pro forma tariffs for their own
wholesale energy sales and purchases.  Order No. 888 also provides for the
full recovery of stranded costs--that is, costs that were prudently incurred
to serve power customers and that could go unrecovered if these customers use
open access to move to another supplier."

3.  How do IPP's decide what fuel supply strategy works best (i.e., buy
bundled delivered fuel from someone vs. buy gas, storage, transport, etc.
separately)?

In my experience, there is no "one size fits all" formula or strategy.  For
example, in the past we've seen Calpine take a very hands-on approach to
supplying its IPP projects.  In the mid to late '80's, during the build out
of several QF's (cogens), Calpine bought natural gas reserves in the ground
and dedicated them to the project.  In today's market, Calpine has scavenged
the gas and basis traders from Statoil and set-up a natural gas desk for the
purchase and transportation management of gas supplies needed for its western
U.S. power projects.  In other projects, developer/owners and their lenders
are satisfied with a less active role in securing gas supply/transportation
to the project.  In short, projects look at the liquidity of the gas supply/
transportation market in deciding whether they can achieve project economics
and secure reliable supply by taking bids or RFP's for gas
supply/transportation, or whether to take a more hands-on approach ala
Calpine.

4.  What is the RTO Rule and why should we care?

Last December, the FERC issued Order No. 2000, a final rule on Regional
Transmission Organizations (RTO's).  Order 2000 builds on the foundation of
Orders 888 and 889 (issued in 1996).  According to FERC Chairman Jim Hoecker,
Order 2000 makes "a persuasive case for separating control of grid operations
from the influence of electricity market participants."  Therefore, Order
2000 can be seen as a natural outgrowth of the perceived limitations on the
functional unbundling adopted in Orders 888 and 889, continuing balkanization
of the electric transmission grid based on corporate, not state or regional
boundaries, as well as pressure to provide guidance on acceptable forms of
privately-owned transmission companies.

FERC prescribes a voluntary approach to RTO participation.  The order
initiates a regional collaborative process to foster RTO formation.  The
Order also imposes filing requirements on the privately owned "public
utilities" that are subject to FERC jurisdiction, and requires these private
utilities to describe in their filings how they have attempted to accommodate
the needs of transmission owning state/municipal, cooperative and federally
owned systems.  FERC believes that, regardless of format, RTO's will offer
the following benefits: (1) alleviate stress on the bulk power system caused
by structural changes in the industry, (2) improve efficiencies in
transmission grid management through better pricing and congestion
management, (3) improve grid reliability, (4) remove remaining opportunities
for discriminatory practices, (5) improve market performance, (6) increase
coordination among state regulatory agencies, (7) cut transaction costs, (8)
facilitate the success of state retail access programs, and (9) facilitate
lighter-handed regulation.

Critics point out that with its emphasis on flexibility, voluntary RTO
formation and transmission rate reforms (i.e., incentives), Order 2000 defers
for case-specific disposition many of the tough issues that must be resolved
in order to create an operational RTO.   Moreover, Order 2000 does not compel
any transmission owner to join an RTO, but provides only regulatory guidance
and incentives for willing participants, as well as a veiled threat of
further consequences for the hold-outs.

As to the final part of the question ("why should we care?"), presumably, the
development of a fully-functioning RTO network will promote both the
efficiency and market transparency goals of the original FERC orders.  As
FERC reads it, the future of gas-fired generation for both merchant and
utility systems, depends on an efficiently operated open access transmission
system.  Therefore, the promise of the RTO is to stimulate competition and
the ongoing investment in new generation infrastructure.  Unfortunately,
sources tell me that the voluntary nature of the RTO program may ultimately
cripple its effectiveness in meeting its stated goals.

5.  Has $5/mmbtu gas killed the gas fired power market?

Natural gas prices of $5/MMBtu can only "kill" gas-fired power plants in
those instances where (1) there are more economical alternatives to natural
gas fuel, (2) demand for electric power is offset through demand side
management or (3) natural gas in an environment of short supply is expressly
prohibited from use as a power plant fuel.  In the Western U.S. marketplace,
particularly in California, I see no viable alternative to natural gas fuel
for electric power generation.  Renewable resources currently meet less than
5% of the total electric resource requirements.  $32/barrel oil prices give
fuel oil no clear economic advantage over natural gas (even at a $5/MMBtu
price).  Moreover, California environmental and permitting regulations make
the installation of new electric generation based on anything other than
natural gas fuel or renewable resources virtually impossible.   While demand
side management programs are the politically correct approach to meeting
resource needs, historically, they have served only a minor role in
offsetting the growth in electric power.  As to the final point, I'm unable
to comment on the risk of future legal/regulatory restrictions governing the
use of natural gas as a boiler or turbine fuel.

Steven Harris
10/26/2000 10:05 AM
To: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Electric Developments

Since you are the "expert" in this area, I need to know what economics would
determine if a developer could site a power plant in New Mexico (maybe
3,000MW) and build a line to the grid in California versus us expanding to
deliver the gas to a power plant in California. If you could let me know by
next Friday I would appreciate it.

Kevin Hyatt
10/25/2000 04:32 PM
To: sharris1@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Electric Developments

Steve, see below.  Drew asked me to help him out with his meeting.
kh

---------------------- Forwarded by Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron on 10/25/2000
04:34 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Drew Fossum                           10/25/2000 01:49 PM

To: Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kim Wilkie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Electric Developments

When we originally decided to use my staff meetings for "graduate education"
one of the hot topics was the electric industry.  We all had a first lesson
on this topic in Shelley's electricity seminar last summer.  Now, John and
Kevin have graciously agreed to join us Tuesday at 1:30 to discuss recent
developments in electric markets and NN's and TW's efforts to attract power
generation load to the system.  Specific topics I hope to cover include the
following:
1.  What are the key factors that determine where a power plant developer
puts his plant?
2.  Do the transmission access and pricing rules of the various
utilities/power pools vary all that much or are Order 888 tariffs pretty much
the same all over?
3.  How do IPPs decide what fuel supply strategy works best (i.e., buy
bundled delivered fuel from someone vs. buy gas, storage, transport, etc.
separately)?
4.  What is the RTO Rule and why should we care?
5.  Has $5/mmbtu gas killed the gas fired power market?
 Depending on how deeply we get into these topics, we may need to schedule a
follow-up session at a later date.  I look forward to seeing you on Tuesday.
DF


COPY ANY DVD MOVIE ON CD-R!!!
With our revolutionary software you can copy virtually
any DVD Movie using your existing equipment!
Conventional DVD copying equipment can cost thousands of $$$The revolutionary software is less than the price of 3 DVD Movies!
ORDER within the next 48 hours and we will include a secret source
for thousands of new DVD movies online and available for free!CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO
If you wish to be removed simply Click Here


Price cap aand Oversight Board frivolities
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 09/08/2000 08:09
AM ---------------------------

Carl Imparato <cfi1@tca-us.com> on 09/07/2000 11:07:54 PM
Please respond to cfi1@tca-us.com
To: smara@enron.com
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: FW: You should look at this -- Reuters on $100/MWh price caps
for ISO and PX]

More bad stuff on the way...

Carl

Return-Path: <fpickel@tca-us.com>
Received: from nautilus.shore.net (nautilus.shore.net [207.244.124.104]) by
shell2.shore.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA13893 for
<cfi1@shell2.shore.net>; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:49:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from (mailnweb.tca-us.com) [207.31.208.21]  by nautilus.shore.net
with esmtp (Exim) for cfi1@shore.net id 13XFAY-00058W-00; Thu, 07 Sep 2000
23:49:38 -0400
Received: by mailnweb.tca-us.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<RLG1Y5TH>; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:48:44 -0400
Received: from tcaus (ZZYXP3DELL [172.16.121.84]) by mailnweb.tca-us.com with
SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id
RLG1Y5TF; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:48:32 -0400
Reply-To: <fpickel@tca-us.com>
From: "Fred Pickel" <fpickel@tca-us.com>
To: "Richard Tabors \(E-mail\)" <tabors@tca-us.com>,        "Scott Englander
\(E-mail\)" <sle@tca-us.com>,        "Narasimha Rao \(E-mail\)"
<nrao@tca-us.com>,        "Judith Cardell \(E-mail\)",        "Ellen
[Banaghan] Wolfe \(E-mail\)" <ellen@tca-us.com>,        "Carl Imparato
\(E-mail\)" <cfi1@tca-us.com>
Subject: FW: You should look at this -- Reuters on $100/MWh price caps for
ISO and PX
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:45:44 -0400
Message-ID: <000c01c01947$ef44a680$547910ac@com.tcaus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000D_01C01926.68330680"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal

Oh  boy!? What a mess.
?

?Frederick H. Pickel,  Ph.D
?Vice President
?Tabors Caramanis &  Associates
?Los Angeles, California
?& Cambridge,  Massachusetts
?email: fpickel@tca-us.com
?alternate email:  fred.pickel@ALUM.mit.edu
?tel +1 (323) 937-7920
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Van Vactor  [mailto:svv@econ.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:44  PM
To: Lisa_G_Urick@calpx.com
Cc: Dona K.  Lehr
Subject: You should look at this

?

By Nigel Hunt

?? LOS  ANGELES, Sept 7 (Reuters) - The cap on wholesale power prices in
California  could be cut for the third time this year, this time to $100 per
megawatt hour  after starting the year at $750 per MWh.

?? The  state's Electricity Oversight Board (EOB) is to make a request to the
California  Independent System Operator (ISO) within the next few days on the
issue  following a resolution by the state's lawmakers last week.

?? "We will  make a formal request within the next few days," EOB Executive
Director Gary  Heath said.

?? An  assembly joint resolution approved last week called on the EOB to
direct the ISO  to "show cause why the price caps in the ancillary services
and real-time energy  markets should not be lowered to $100 per megawatt-hour
immediately and continue  until at least March 31, 2001."

?? The cap  currently stands at $250 per MWh after previous cuts from $750 to
$500 and $500  to $250 amid growing consumer unrest about skyrocketing
electricity bills and  allegations of possible price gouging by generators.

?? The  assembly resolution says the EOB should report back to the
legislature by  December 1, 2000.

?? There was  heavy criticism of the ISO, which controls most of the state's
power grid, by  lawmakers this year at its governing board twice rejected
resolution to cut the  cap to $250 from $500 before finally agreeing to such
a move.

?? Heath  noted the EOB at a meeting last week decided not to approve the
appointment or  reappointment of 13 members of the ISO board and 12 members
of the California  Power Exchange's governing board.

?? "We are  trying to place people who are a bit more mindful of the
implications of board  decisions on Californian consumers," Heath said.

?? Existing  board members will remain in office until replacements can be
appointed.

?? Heath  said that some individuals who were rejected may eventually be
approved and the  EOB was rather making a statement about the performance of
the two boards.

?? "The  board was making a very clear statement that we are not satisfied
with the the  efforts of the ISO or PX governing boards to proect Californian
consumers,"  Heath said.

?? Wholesale  power prices in California soared to record levels during a
heatwave in June and  many customers in San Diego faced a tripling in their
electricity bills.

? Supporters of  cutting the cap believe the power market is not "workably
competitive" and  prices rose to excessive levels during the heatwave,
putting an unfair burden on  both ratepayers and shareholders of investor
owned utilities.

?? Opponents  have been led by independent power producers who have argued a
lower cap could  make it more difficult for the state to import power at
times of shortage.

?? Emergency  legislation signed into law by Calif. Gov. Gray Davis on
Wednesday imposed a  price cap on how much San Diego residents should pay
which was less than a third  of the current "free market" rate.

? Customers of  San Diego Gas and Electric, a unit of Sempra Energy <SRE.N>,
had been  exposed to market based prices under the terms of California's
power  deregulation.

?? Rates for  customers of California's other two investor owned utilities,
Edison  International's <EIX.N> Southern California Edison and PG&E Corp.'s
<PCG.N> Pacific Gas and Electric, are frozen.

?? A  spokesman for the California ISO was not immediately available for
comment.

?? ((--Los  Angeles bureau + 1 213 955 6752))


Hi Mark,

Thanks for the data, but I'am missing the timestamp information in both
XLS-files. Can you support me also (if possible today) with this timestamp
information?

Klaus

Mark Fisher@ENRON
23.05.2002 17:26
An: Klaus Holtel/DEVELOP/TWT/DE@TWTDE
Kopie: Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON
Thema: Reqested Texas Data

Klaus,

The 10-minute data for both sites is in the zipped file attached below. The
starting times are either end of last year of the beginning of this year. In
addition there are some gaps in the data. I hope that this will provide what
you need.

Mark Fisher


Dear Board members,
    Attached please find the draft agenda for the upcoming Board meeting on
March 2.  It is Adobe Acrobat .pdf format, and can be opened and read with
Adobe Acrobat's free reader.  The materials for the meeting will follow
shortly.  This announcement and agenda will also be faxed to your offices and
posted on our home page.  Please call if you have any questions. Best
Regards, Rae McQuade

 - am000302.PDF


Here is the new value tabs.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks
Ben


Joe, I would appreciate a quick call by you to Larry to ensure that his
organization is focused to get these plants over the goal line ASAP.  We
still have technical issues with the vendor that need to be addressed.  I
believe EE&CC is working the issues; however, a phone call from you to
emphasize the importance to Enron will add extra encouragement.

Thanks.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/15/2000
05:41 PM ---------------------------

David W Delainey
05/15/2000 04:42 PM
To: John Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gavin
Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert P
Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dobler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: 2000 Peakers

Guys, I understand that none of the facilities were available today - I
thought we were targeting 750 MW.  What is the updated availability schedule
for each unit?  We are only a couple of weeks from June 1.  Please advise.

Regards
Delainey


Fran and Tricia... this note is to confirm that I will be an employee of ENA
effective Dec. 1/ 00.  Fran, are you looking after payroll issues or is it
going to be Jeannie Sloan

Thanks. BT


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	1/2 Day Vacation

Date:		8/1/2000
Time:		1:00 PM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


update:

we are scheduled to sign the transaction agreement at ve on monday at 2,
i believe that we have worked out getting the sub notes off balance sheet for
year end if do not close the transaction till january.
i almost hate to put this in email, as every time we say this hit a snag,
but.......all i will say if this does not happen on monday i may have to go
awol.

Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com


"Pavo, Mike" <mike.pavo@nrgenergy.com> writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE
Discussion List:

It appears that the scheduling limits between ISONE and NYISO need to be
clarified and/or corrdinated.  I offer the following evidence:

> ISONE transfer limit to NY    = 600mw
> NYISO ATC/TTC posting (import from ISONE)  = 950mw
> NYISO DAM Net Import (from ISONE)   = 800 to 1050mw

1. how can NY resolve in the DAM more imports from ISONE than their own
TTC or more than ISONE's transfer limitation?
> I understand that there is no restriction on a Participant selling DA
and taking the risk of being able to deliver, but surely the software
should recognize the TTC limit and cut/prorate schedules based on price,
down to the TTC limit.  And I would presume that the two ISO's would
agree daily on the TTC limits between their respective pools, thus
ensuring that the DA transfers are always equal to or less than TTC..

2. how can we get the ISO's to coordinate something as simple as
transfer limits?
> At one time in my past life, the limiting control area's limit was the
TTC value used for both CA's....this must be on the SEAMS agenda...

Inquirying minds want to know....

Mike Pavo
NRG Power Marketing Inc
(612) 313-8730
Email: mike.pavo@nrgenergy.com

This electronic mail transmission and any accompanying documents contain
information belonging to the sender which may be confidential and
legally privileged.  This information is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to whom this electronic mail transmission was
sent as indicated above.  If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the
contents of the information contained in this transmission is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this transmission in error, please
call me collect at 612-313-8730 to notify me and delete the message.
Thank you.


Attached is a revised regulatory matrix for the Gallup Expansion reflecting
Transwestern's request for a waiver of the 6 month requirement and a request
for an extension of time to file the final costs.  Any questions, please let
me know.


Please ask wes to come over for 9:30 or earlier

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


Maria Teresa,

Please, forward the message to Dr. Kloucek.
Thanks.

Dear Dr. Kloucek,

I had a few problems with E-mail over the last few days
(migration to M/S Outlook). I hope to be able to send
my presentation in a few days.

I shall be glad to speak at your seminar. Please,
feel free to contact me at 713 853 3848.

Vince Kaminski

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Aguilera-Peon, Maria Teresa
Sent:	Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J.
Subject:	from Petr Kloucek

Hi Vince,
    My name is Maria Teresa Aguilera-Peon, and Dr. Kloucek was one of my professors back at Rice.  He was having difficulties being able to contact you, so he asked me if I could please forward this email on to you.
  Maria Teresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Petr Kloucek <kloucek@rice.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Petr+20Kloucek+20+3Ckloucek+40rice+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:02 PM
To:	Aguilera-Peon, Maria Teresa
Subject:	please forward

Dear Vincent,

I am one of the organizers of the SIAM conf.  where you gave a presentation.
I missed your talk but I talked to you just after your presentation. I
wonder if I could get a copy of your PP slides.

On a related matter. Would you consider to give a talk at Rice at my
seminar, taking to applied and statistics audience? I would be happy to
arrange for your visit.

Yours,

Petr
______________________________________________
Petr Kloucek

Dept. of Computational and Applied Mathematics
Rice University
6100 Main Str.
Houston, TX 77005
USA

E-mail: kloucek@rice.edu
Phone/VoiceMail: (713) 348-5724
FAX: (713) 348-6217


Yes, my mistake.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, John
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:35 AM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	RE: How are we doing and what are my issues meeting?

Rod, I noticed that Caroline was not invited.  Should she be?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Wednesday, October 17, 2001 7:49 AM
To:	Anderson, Michael; Piro, Jim; Lindholm, Tod A.; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Peters, Jerry; Saunders, James; Geaccone, Tracy; Norris, Michael; Marlow, Keith; Gilbert, Steve; Keiser, John; Ratner, Michael; Clayton, Lawrence; Rice, Greek; Bickett, Kenny
Cc:	Campos, Kathy
Subject:	RE: How are we doing and what are my issues meeting?

The consensus is now for an am meeting.     I will have Kathy Campos, my assistant, begin to set things up.    For those out of town, you can consider attending via the telephone and if Kathy can get it set up, we will have a video conference call as well.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 5:46 PM
To:	Anderson, Michael; Piro, Jim; Lindholm, Tod A.; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Peters, Jerry; Saunders, James; Geaccone, Tracy; Norris, Michael; Marlow, Keith; Gilbert, Steve; Keiser, John; Ratner, Michael; Clayton, Lawrence
Cc:	Campos, Kathy
Subject:	How are we doing and what are my issues meeting?
Importance:	High

I would like to have a meeting on October 31st (maybe later if that date won't work), either in the AM or the PM, but probably about 3 hours or so.    I would like to discuss organizations and how we are going to provide the support the EGS organization requires both at Stan's level and at each level in the organization.    I would also like to discuss the top 3-5 concerns you have for your business and your people.   You should decide if there are people in your organization that are needed to discuss basic functions of Planning, Accounting, Finance and Tax and feel free to include them in this process, but I would like to keep the group to Director level or above.    Please let Kathy know who they are.    I would like to know if you are available or have a preference for morning or afternoon.

Thanks.

Rod Hayslett
EB4054
713-853-6178


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000 11:30
AM ---------------------------
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Sitara Deal # 96724 Alteration

Hello,

We had trouble calc'ing our BC Physical books yesterday and pinponted it to
this deal, which had an addition yesterday.
In order to get a calc. we deleted the day from the deal. This of course will
go back in, and I just wanted to let you know what is happening.
The deal was for 111 MMBTU's; EC - IM Canada BC buying from ENA - IM West;
the entry was dated 05/24/00 to PGEN/KINGSGATE/KING from PGEN/KINGSGATE/KING
for a fee of NOVA_AECO-DAILY-US-CGPR...

I have let Rich Gebauer know about it on our end.

Have a great weekend.

Brian.


The ABB breakout contract and the GE breakout contract are just about done.
I'm not volunteering for change order duty.  Do you think this is a good
Roger task?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/04/2001 12:03
PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey Keenan@ECT
01/04/2001 11:51 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: LM6000 Contract Changes

Kay:

How are we coming along on the items below? (I was assigned to monitor the
progress . . . sorry)

Jeffrey Keenan
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT on 01/04/2001
11:49 AM ---------------------------

12/18/2000 02:13 PM
Shelby Malkemes@ENRON
Shelby Malkemes@ENRON
Shelby Malkemes@ENRON
12/18/2000 02:13 PM
12/18/2000 02:13 PM
To: Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: LM6000 Contract Changes

Please follow-up on the City of Austin change orders with Kay Mann.
---------------------- Forwarded by Shelby Malkemes/Corp/Enron on 12/18/2000
02:13 PM ---------------------------

karla.hesketh@us.abb.com on 12/18/2000 10:07:48 AM
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com, rebecca.walker@enron.com
cc: j.y.davis@us.abb.com, frank.chmiel@us.abb.com,
michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com
Subject: LM6000 Contract Changes

Ben/Rebecca,

There are several changes which we have been asked to proceed with for which
we
have not received contract change notices.

They are:

1)   Hauling and Installation of City of Austin Transformers (LNL9521-1 & -2)
$93,200.00.
2)   An additional crane for the City of Austin transformers (ABB S O Nos.
LNL9521-1 & -2) during the hauling and installation $9504.00.  Verbal OK from
Ben to Mike.
3)   A change authorized by D. Hammond/Enron to the Las Vegas Transformers
(LNL9518-1 & -2) including redesign costs, additional radiators and use of
high
delivery fans.  $49,500.00 X 2 = $99,000.00.
4)   On 11/15/00 Mike Coleman advised ABB St. Louis to proceed on
(modification
of the covers/bushing turrets for use at higher altitude) on the Fountain
Project Colorado transformers(LNL9518-1 -2 & -3).
We have not received a change order in the amount of $15,200.00 X 3 =
$45,600.00.

There is also one (Item 5 below) pending authorization to proceed.

5)   We await authorization to proceed and a change order from Ed
Dannhaus/Enron
for the Fountain Project Colorado transformers (LNL9517-1-2 & -3) to proceed
to
add 2 air terminal chambers to each of these transformers $19,500.00 per
transformers X 3 =  $58,500.00

Will these items be included in the facility agreement?

Please call if you need additional information regarding the above.

Regards,
Karla


Attached are draft Q&A on Enron's response to the Greenpeace letter on
climate change.   This document should be for close distribution to those of
us in Enron Corp and Enron Europe who could potentially get questions on our
response.  More general taking points for use by employees will be developed
for distribution to a wider internal audience.

I would suggest that any detailed questions be referred to me so that we are
able to closely control the messages consistent with our Corporate
statement/strategy on climate.  If questions specific to Enron Europe come
up, they should be referred to PR (Jackie/Kate) in London or Peter Styles in
Brussels, who will coordinate closely with me.

Please review this document and make suggested changes and additions as soon
as possible, as the letter has already been sent to Greenpeace (signed by
Kelly and Mike on 4/30).

Thanks!

Jeffrey Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron
Washington DC office - (202) 466-9157
Cell Phone (203) 464-1541


We received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 11/6/01 from the referenced CP.  The document will be scanned into Livelink.


Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date:  TUESDAY, September 5
Time:  11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video:  Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera
(713/853-5984)
  or Katherine Brown (713/345-7774) for the weekly dial-in number and
passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.

 Yes, I will attend in person _______

 By video conference from _______

 By conference call  _______

 No, I will not attend  _______

*  *  *

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
September 1.

Thank you,
Katherine


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2001
05:51 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@btu.net> on 03/30/2001 05:42:52 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly

Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wg040201.pdf


In response to yesterday's staff meeting, please plan to attend a meeting
next Wednesday August 9th, from 2:00 - 6:00 pm in Conference Room 21c2.  As
Brenda lined out yesterday, the goal of the meeting is to reassess the
organizational structure.  Be prepared to offer positive helpful suggestions,
comments and ideas.

If you have any questions, please call.

Thank You!
Yvette
x3.5953


Unless we begin to see some trading activity, I would consider it inactive.

From: Sara Shackleton on 06/29/2000 08:59 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: BP Oil International Ltd. ("BP")

Rod and I discussed this party (which always appears on the legal/credit
list!!!!  It seem that BP signed a Master Agreement (our OLD form) with
ECTRIC on 1/8/98 and agreed to sign THE IDENTICAL AGREEMENT with ENA.  Absent
an executed agreement, ENA and BP continue to use a form of "Swap Contract"
which had been agreed to many years ago (similar to our GTC's in the omnibus)
which also provides that the parties will negotiate a master agreement.   Rod
doesn't see much current trading activity so we didn't believe this to be a
high priority.

Having said all of this, the form is limited to swaps, doesn't provide for
setoff, arbitration, certain market disruption events and several other items
which we can review if necessary.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.  Thanks.  Sara


Thanks, John, I will add Sarita to my "cc" list.    And, yes, we'll get both
you and Phil on Stan's calendar to go over the "Operations Alliances"
topic...I will await their call to schedule.

Cindy

From: John Shafer/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/15/2001 07:32 PM
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: ETS Staff Meeting Schedule Changes for the Remainder of May

Cindy,
Will you please add my new Administrative Assistant to your future "cc"
lists?  She is Sarita Garza.  Thanks so much.  John

P.S.  I have asked Sarita and Amelia to get with you and see when a favorable
date would be that Phil Lowry and I could have about 30 minutes with Stan to
go over the "Operations Alliances" with him (since his half day staff meeting
was cancelled for May 16).  Anyway, this is just a heads-up that they will be
in touch to get a date confirmed.  Thank you.  JHS

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Stark, Cindy   On Behalf Of Horton, Stanley
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Cordes, Bill; Corman, Shelley; Hotte, Steve; Hayslett, Rod; Hartsoe, Joe;
Lowry, Phil; Fossum, Drew; McCarty, Danny; Smith, Gary P.; Prentice, James;
Vonderheide, Scott; Harris, Steven; Neubauer, Dave; Hayes, Robert; McCoppin,
Dorothy; Kilmer III, Robert; Miller, Mary Kay; Pribble, Dan; Nelson, Michel;
Rice, Randy; Keller, John; Shafer, John; Peters, Jerry; McGowan, Mike W.;
Martin, Jerry D.
Cc: Benner, Martha; Winters, Ricki; Rita Houser/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON; Campos,
Kathy; Hawkins, Bernadette; Alder, Amelia; Sellers, Emily; Armstrong, Julie;
Perry, Carolyn; Hogan, Janice; Cappiello, Deborah; Alexander, Betty;
Kovalcik, Tammy; Solon, Sharon; Paschal, Zelda; Gallishaw, Melinda; Ladish,
Kim; Kudym, Judy
Subject: ETS Staff Meeting Schedule Changes for the Remainder of May
Importance: High

This is to advise you that we have canceled next Monday's (May 21) 9:15AM ETS
Staff Meeting and will resume the following week on Tuesday (May 29) from
9:30 to 11:00AM in 49C2.

NOTE:  Next week, in the absence of our staff meeting, Stan would like you to
send him (via electronic mail) brief, updated bullet points.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Thanks,
Cindy
X36197


Dear Dynegydirect  Customer:

In our efforts to provide you the best on-line trading product in the
industry, we would like to request your participation in the following
survey.  The survey contains questions regarding funtionality, performance
and customer service of Dynegydirect.

Please follow the steps below to complete the survey.  The survey should
take less than 5 minutes to complete.

1. Please click the link below to go to the survey.
2. Enter your Dynegydirect ID on the first page and click on START.  We use
your ID to ensure that only Dynegydirect customers participate in the
survey.
3. Complete the survey and click on SUBMIT.

http://www.dynegydirect.com/content/survey/satisfactionsurvey.htm

Your participation in the survey is greatly appreciated by Dynegydirect.
If you encounter any difficulty with the link or need assistance with the
survey, please call e-Care at 1-877-396-3493.

Many thanks,

e-Care Center
Dynegy, Inc.


Neil,

I am not really plugged into this issue.  I have been focusing on running the
west delivery curve development, CA retail, and new systems development.
Give Sue or Jeff a call, they will have better intuitions.

Roger

Neil Bresnan
09/11/2000 09:59 AM
To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: CA Price cap

Roger,

When you have a second would you fill me in on where you think this issue
will end up ?  Currently October NP15 is trading at 120 - I don't want to buy
it if there is a chance that there will be a price cap at 100.00.  I'd also
like to discuss our cost if we are short ? I assume 100 for expost and 100
for replacement ? total 200

thanks

NFB


Russell:
FYI.
CArol

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/19/2000 01:34 PM -----

	Stephanie Sever
	06/19/2000 01:31 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp

Carol,

1. We have set up the Master User from Aquila Risk under Utilicorp.  We do
not require any further paperwork from them, however, we do need them to set
up their sub-users.  I am going to follow up with Angela Webber at Utilicorp
tomorrow to make sure that sub users are set up.

2. I will notify you once sub-user accounts have been set up and then wait
for your instructions as to when we will shut Aquila Risk down for trading.

Thanks,
Stephanie x33465

   Carol St Clair                06/19/2000 11:49 AM

To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Utilicorp

Stephanie and Frank:
Both Susan Bailey and I have spoken with Utilicorp's attorney and here is my
understanding of where things stand:

1. On Friday, it was my understanding that they submitted their password
application and that the problem was that the person that they needed to set
up the sub-user passwords was not in the office.  My understanding is that he
will be in on Tuesday and that is when they are going to try to set up those
accounts.  Does that require them to send any paperwork to us?

2. Once the sub-user accounts are set up, then we need to pick a date for the
Transfer Agreement to become effective.  Since we are changing the date from
June 16th, this will require someone from Utilicorp to initial the change and
their attorney wasn't sure when that will happen.  Once the new date is
picked and initialed, then we can begin trading under Utilicorp's name, but
nothing should be done until before then.  Either Susan or I will let you
know when that date is.

Please call me at 33989 if you have any questions.
Carol


here is the WACOG Delma.  Cathy could you add her to the email.  Thanks.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000
10:32 AM ---------------------------

Cathy De La Torre
07/06/2000 10:32 AM
To: Eric Francis Calub/HOU/ECT@ECT, Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle
Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba A Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shannon
Carmichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristen J
Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Francis Calub/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer D Pattison/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: WACOG 06/00 Prod


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	TMS Weekly Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		3/14/2001
Time:		1:30 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description: