Attached in MS Word format is a memorandum and outline addressing potential
"options and solutions" that will be used by IEP in upcoming regulatory and
legislative efforts.? The memorandum and outline will be reviewed, discussed,
dissected and vastly improved at the November 3 IEP meeting.? This represents
a collection of various ideas brought forward to date and must be considered
a "work in progress."? It has not been comprehensively reworked in light of
the November 1 FERC Order.

The outline begins with a discussion of the &jurisdictional context8 that
must be kept in mind when developing IEP,s response, including the
regional/interstate nature of the Western markets and the respective roles of
FERC and the CPUC.? The second section is the largest part of the outline,
and it discusses in detail the &problems8 IEP,s response addresses, primarily
in terms of &marketplace fundamentals8 as well as market structure issues.?
IEP,s membership is extremely well versed in the myriad of problems facing
the industry, but nevertheless it is vitally important to discuss and agree
on specifics so that our options and solutions can be presented as a durable,
comprehensive and cohesive message.? The outline's fourth section discusses
certain characteristics or perspectives that must be considered when crafting
our response, such as the relationship between retail and wholesale markets
as well as the larger regional markets.? Potential short- and long-term
responses are presented in the next two sections, and the outline concludes
with potential IEP &retail/demand8 proposal.

Please contact me if you require the file in another format or if you have
problems with the attachment.? ABB

Andrew B. Brown
Ellison, Schneider & Harris, LLP
2015 H Street
Sacramento, CA? 95814
Phone: (916) 447-2166
Fax: (916) 447-3512
mailto:abb@eslawfirm.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:? This communication and any accompanying document(s)
are confidential and privileged.? They are intended for the sole use of the
addressee.? If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.? Moreover, any such
inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
privilege as to this communication or otherwise.? If you have received this
communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.
?
?
 - 001101 IEP Solutions and Options.v2.doc


Dear All,

	Do you know any of the following applications? What they are used for and who uses them?

	Thanks,

Norman.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nommensen, Dave
Sent:	Monday, January  14, 2002 10:31 AM
To:	Larkin, Brian
Cc:	Lee, Norman; Balasundaram, Arun
Subject:	Business Applications\Power Curves

Brian,

Could you provide me the userids that have access to these apps.  We do not recognize them and need to find out if anybody is still running them.

Thanks, d.n.

Start\Programs\Business Applications\Power Curves
Curve Comparison
Curve Scalar
Power-Curve East
Power-Curve PJM
Power-Curve West


Dave:
Here is the latest version, please ignore the earlier version if you have not
seen it already.  Thank you!
Ben


So on the EDF Man acct if we executed and cleared throught them the total cost paid to EDF is  what ?
with the Floor rate 1.25 & clearing 0.90


*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Daily Riddle ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Today's Riddle is -

A rich man's son was kidnapped. The ransom note told him to bring
a valuable diamond to a phone booth in the middle of a public park.
Plainclothes police officers surrounded the park, intending to follow
the criminal or his messenger. The rich man arrived at the phone booth
and followed instructions but the police were powerless to prevent
the diamond from leaving the park and reaching the crafty villain.
What did he do?

As always, you will find the answer below today's sponsor.

Please take a moment and visit today's sponsor-

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
AMAZING WEIGHT LOSS!!!
Lose those unwanted inches and pounds... start now
and be a better you for the swimsuit summer ahead!!! GO TO:
  www.aaaopportunity
.com/trace.asp?name=riddles
  Losing weight is easy, if you have this system... get it today at:
  www.aaaopportunity
.com/trace.asp?name=riddles
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

The answer to today's Riddle is -

This is a true story from Taiwan. When the rich man reached the phone
booth he found a carrier pigeon in a cage. It had a message attached
telling the man to put the diamond in a small bag which was around the
pigeon's neck and to release the bird. When the man did this the police
were powerless to follow the bird as  it returned across the city to
its owner.

=============================================================

---
You are currently subscribed to riddles as: mike.grigsby@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-riddles-8238I@riddlesandmore.net


Steve,

This is a third draft of a letter to Wyden re: information release.  The
latest draft incorporates comments of Tim Belden and Jim Steffes.

Who do you recommend I work with to get this letter finalized?

Alan Comnes


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000
05:14 PM ---------------------------

Doug Nelson@ENRON
11/07/2000 05:13 PM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Liquidation Oct 2000

Darron,

For Oct 2000 I found a Liquidation amount in the Central region for The
Peoples Gas Light & Coke......$336,234.06
Yet, I show no transactions for them in that region.  I looked in tagg - deal
capture and for the tagg numbers listed
in the detail OA-liquidation spreadsheet (N17872.1   N17872.2   N18064.1
N18064.2), I either saw no "comments",
or there was a comment referring to a "North Shore Baseload sale".

Would you please assist me or direct me to the person who would be familiar
with this.
I am placing copies of the documents referred to above, on your desk.

Thanks for you help.

Doug


It is definitely a CES deal that will be over in Sep or Oct of this year.

Cyndie Balfour-Flanagan@ENRON
05/25/2000 04:52 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie
Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Local Production for June

If the deal is confirmable as a deal that came across on CES's books
[reported as an active deal by CES to ENA], then the deal is a CES deal (CES
- Statoil). BUT, if this is a newly discovered deal - - - - we will need to
confirm with Risk (Mark Breese) to ensure proper booking & that the deal has
been quantified; OR if it is a newly negotiated deal or a deal finalized
after 1/1/00, then it should be entered without the CES prefix (statoil).
Based on the production dates of deal# 280185 and #226563, as combine with
the fact and that I can not find anything in the CES deal listing (CES
'books') specifying a 333/day deal with Statoil I am again hesitant to use
the CES prefix (nor can I confirm that deal #226563 should have been entered
with the CES prefix.

John, can you fill in the missing details?

Cyndie

Chris Germany@ECT
05/25/2000 04:19 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyndie
Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth L Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Local Production for June

John, I took the volumes on deal 226556 to 0 for the term of the deal
starting June 1.  This is the purchase from Belden & Blake behind NYSEG.

I changed the volume on deal 226563 from 1 dth/day to 1500 dth/day.  This is
the purchase from StatOil at CPA.  The price on this deal is NX1 + .434 and
the price on John's worksheet is NX1 + .54 (per MCF).  John, is this price
adjusted for dth??

I created deal 280185, purchase from StatOil, volume of 333 day, the price is
NX1+ $.56 PER MCF.  This is a purchase of local production behind the
citygate.  David, this deal probably needs to be hedged in Sitara.
Cindy - deal 226563 is a purchase from CES - Statoil Energy.  I set up deal
280185 with the same counterparty.  This deal should have been in the system
effective 1/1/2000.  According to Elizabeth, we should not use the CES -
StatOil Energy.  It doesn't matter to me how its set up, however, this deal
should have been in the system from Jan and it is the same type of deal as
deal 226563.

I changed the volume on deal 226747 from 1 dth to 1100 dth/day.  This is a
purchase from Questar and it is also local production behind CPA.
John, there are 3 deals for Questar, the other 2 deals have volumes of 0
right now.  Can you tell me how the volume should be split out for pricing
purposes?

Molly, I created deal 280132, FOM priced sale to CES.  This deal will be
matched with the CPA local production deals.

Let me know if anyone has any questions.

Thanks
cg 3-4743

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 02:41
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
05/24/2000 05:26 PM
To: hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com, cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com,
jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT (bcc: Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Local Production for June

Please send this email to anyone that may need to see it.  I'm sure I left
someone out.

This is citygate gas ENA will sell to CES for June.  This will reduce the
numbers on the sheet Doug sent us yesterday.

East Ohio Gas on CNG
10,000 dth/ month from Power Gas Marketing

CPA on TCO
500 dth/day from Power Gas Marketing
1,833 dth/day from StatOil
1,100 dth/day from Questa - Note:  this is an estimated volume.  We should
know the actual volume in the next day or so.

Note:  CES is not taking any Carnagie gas at CPA.

National Fuel
250 dth/day from Belden & Blake.  The deal expires 6/30/2000.

Equitrans
All of the Equitrans is production or pool gas on the pipeline.  ENA
nominates this gas.  CES still has a citygate load of 1,280 dth/day for June
on Equitrans so the production gas will be delivered to CES.

CES will not be receiving any local production behind Peoples or NYSEG.


HA market HE's 0700-1100 GMM's and TMM's have been re-published.  You may
now view the GMM's and TMM's for the HA market,  2/5/02, HE's 0700-1100.
Sent by Market Operations, inquiries please call the Hour Ahead Desk.


Start Date: 12/24/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122401.txt


She sure did.  Molly Sumrow.

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 07/25/2000 06:53:04 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Molly J.

Chris--Did Molly Johnson change her name when she got married?  My e-mails to
her keep coming back to me undelivered.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317


Heather and I just want to thankyou for the Air force book you sent us.   We
love it!  Heather sat down, and read the whole thing last week end... She
can't believe you used to fly a C-5.
Anyway ,,, thankyou so much.

MC


This deal has an SP 15 delivery point with firm energy.

Thanks!


Thanks
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Gentlemen,

 Spoke to Vince K today and asked if he would send Stinson Gibner to Sidney
to be available on Monday to review the X system.
Paul, make sure our X friends are available and the Confidentially Agreement
is signed.  Further, I spoke to Phillip B. about a technical going too.

G'day mates,

Gary


Dear kay mann,

You are invited to participate in the following transaction on
www.dealbench.com:

Issuing Entity / Deal Sponsor: Enron North America Corp.
Deal Description: Florida - Midway Power
Plant Site; St. Lucie
County, Florida

To Access the Transaction:

1. Log on to www.dealbench.com.

2. FIRST TIME USERS: Click on Register Now to create your Username and
Password, complete your contact information, and enter your DealKey.

3. REPEAT USERS: Enter your Username and password. on Update Profile at the
top of the screen and enter your DealKey at the bottom of your User Profile.

4. Your DealKey is: 98873079696224441

5. Click on the Acquisitions & Divestitures Domain to access the transaction.

If you have any questions regarding DealBench, please contact DealBench
Customer Support:

Email: Webmaster@DealBench.com
Phone:  +1-713853-9438
Toll-free: 1-877-367-7170 (from the US) or 0800 0853437 (from the UK).

For Questions about the transaction, please contact the undersigned.

Regards,
Fred Mitro , Enron North America Corp.
853-5406


so is it good luck or bad luck when it rains on your birthday, just kidding happy birthday


Richard et al:
I'm not sure what needs to be done - Nicole says we're doing a physical product in CG&E.  I will forward her message to me to all of you.  Richard & Stacy - please work together to figure out what needs to be done, if anything to the fuel mix part.

Thanks.

Heather
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Mathis/HOU/EES on 10/22/2001 01:24 PM ---------------------------
From:	Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/18/2001 01:31 PM
To:	Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	RE: Ohio Label

Heather,

We are not delivering any power, other than Market Support Generation (MSG), which is provided by the First Energy utility companies.  It should either be the utilities that provide disclosure label information for our label we have to default to "Unknown Purchases" or whatever else is allowed/required by the Ohio PUC's.

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mathis, Heather
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:31 PM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	Ohio Label

Richard:

We need to start sending our Ohio label with the contract to new Ohio customers (CG&E starting in Dec according to Nicole Schwartz).  I've had Sandy Cofer look over this one that was done by Allison way back when to see if it still meets requirements, and it does.  Can you confirm the fuel mixes, etc. for me?

Thanks.

Heather

 << File: CSP-6.01.xls >>


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/08/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,289
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,151
Total Life to Date Transactions	418,813

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/08/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,713	75%
Enron Europe Limited	134	28%
Global Products	149	31%
Enron Metals	293	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	47%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	3,090,978,959
MTD	15,725,761,413
LTD	229,157,446,092
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,171,200,670

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	15,892,879,772

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	553
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	3
Number of Products Offered Today	1,206
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,827
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,697


Idaho Power Company, dba IdaCorp Energy, the utility (IPC) has assigned the majority of their trades to IDACORP Energy, LP.  The trades that IPC retained are as follows:

44573.2
411583
414014
414013
416067
562415
562414

If you trade in the future with either of these CPs, please book them with the appropriate CP.  Thanks for your help.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001
03:47 PM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
04/16/2001 03:26 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: DG Energy Software

Vince,

Here is my edited version of the software license agreement.    Can you read
it once before I forward it for internal approval?   I specified that the
$100,000 covers a single  user  perpetural license,  access to source after
one year,  and covers maintenance and support for one year.

Any suggestions?

--Stinson


I read Wednesday's NGPL order (RP00-18-002) as applying only to NGPL due to
their unique restrictions and tariff rules.  I do not read it as forcing the
rest of the industry (i.e., us) to use the floor rate as the reserve price
for negotiated index rate bids and ordinary recourse rate bids.  I think we
can still determine the reserve price on a prearranged deal like the ENA deal
based on our good faith valuation of the upside provided by the index
mechanism.  I.e., on that type of deal, we can determine that the index
mechanism is worth "x cents" to us and require a discounted recourse rate
bidder to bid more than the floor plus x cents to win.  Agreed?

Note that NGPL whined that the unique rules they are subject to place them at
a competitve disadvantage to the rest of the industry (i.e., us) on this
issue.  The commission didn't say anything about that, implying to me that
the rest of us are still free to do what NGPL cannot do.   DF


Hi Dina,

Do we have a CA with Teska Associates?

Thanks,

Kay


This announcement just came out from TCPL:

Planned Expansion of Alberta and B.C. Systems

 On February 21, 2001, TransCanada informed existing customers holding firm
service transportation
 at the Alberta / B.C. Border Delivery Station and/or the B.C. System that we
were in the process of
 assessing the feasibility of an expansion of the Nova Gas Transmission Ltd.
[NGTL] and B.C. systems.
 TransCanada had received inquiries regarding the potential for expansion of
new firm delivery service
on the NGTL System at the Alberta / B.C. border [A/BC], and on the B.C.
System from A/BC to the
 interconnect with PG&E GT NW [GTN], at Kingsgate B.C. / Eastport, Idaho.
These inquiries had been
driven primarily, but not exclusively, by the GTN open season for additional
capacity into the Pacific
Northwest, and California.

As part of the feasibility assessment, customers with contracted capacity
expiring beyond November 1, 2002
 who wished to turn back capacity were asked to inform us of their requests.
This would form part of a capacity
 rationalization process. Customers currently holding one year re-newable
contracts were asked to inform us
 of their plans to turn back capacity after November 1, 2002.

As well, all existing customers were asked to provide information concerning
their plans to extend their
 contracts beyond the current expiry date as well as their estimate of any
additional firm service requirements
 they may have, in excess of their firm contracts, on our west-path systems.
This solicitation was also
communicated to other parties. This information was to be provided to
TransCanada by March 12, 2001.

Based on these solicitations, TransCanada has received significant
incremental queuing requests in both
 the NGTL and B.C. System queue. Upon receiving signed contracts, TransCanada
plans to seek regulatory
 approval to expand our Alberta System by up to approximately 227mmcf/d of
incremental capacity and
 expand our B.C. System by up to approximately 216 mmcf/d of incremental
capacity.

We are currently tendering precedent agreements for ABC Border and B.C.
system capacity to expansion shippers,
 based on queue priority. These customers will have until April 2, 2001 to
return these agreements. Once
TransCanada has received these executed agreements, we will proceed with the
appropriate processes, including
 regulatory approval, to ensure an on stream date of November 1, 2002.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact
Don Bell at [403] 920.5560,
 don_bell@transcanada.com.


GMAC
PO BOX 8104
Cockeysvile, MD 21030-8104

VIN# 1gcek19t42e124152

Puchase $31724


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 10:39 AM
---------------------------
From: Gus Eghneim@ENRON on 12/07/2000 10:34 AM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Brownsville Storm Water Permit

Let us wait until Mitchell signs and sends out the letter. Then, we can get
them a copy of the signed letter. As far as the info in Mitchell's e-mail, I
do not see any problem in sharing this with them. It certainly helps make our
case that the NOV issue is resolved.

Gus.

	Don Miller@ECT
	12/06/2000 06:18 PM

		 To: Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Brownsville Storm Water Permit

Gus,

Should this go to Cinergy?

Thanks,

Don
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 06:17 PM
---------------------------

Donald Miller@ENRON
12/06/2000 05:30 PM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Brownsville Storm Water Permit

Hey Don,

Is this yours?

Regards
---------------------- Forwarded by Donald Miller/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000
05:25 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Mitchell Hurt                           12/06/2000 04:23 PM

To: Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Donald Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Brownsville Storm Water Permit

Gus,

I spoke with Mr. Jack Wade, TDEC concerning the Multi-Sector General Permit
for Construction, New Storm Water Permit and NOV Status at Brownsville Power..

The Multi-Sector General Permit was issued for construction in lieu of Storm
Water Permit by TDEC direction on August 7, 1998
If by July 1, 2000 the construction activities were not complete, BPI would
have had to transfer the TMGP to a new Storm Water Permit for Construction
that was promulgated this summer.
 The soil erosion control & countermeasures taken and completed by BPI on
June 15, 2000 has completely satisfied TDEC  concerns outlined in the NOV's
dated 2-28-99 and 5-1-00.   Mr. Wade asked my opinion of vegetative
stablization, which was the last condition by TDEC before allowing BPI to
terminate the construction permit,  I responded that, in my opinion, the
stablization throughout the facility was excellent.

I have attached a "Draft" letter to TDEC requesting the termination of the
TMGP.  Please review and comment at your earliest convenience.

Respectfully Mitchell


Hello, Pat and I were thinking it would be nice to have a wedding shower
bbq for Alice and Jeff. I talked to Alice and Saturday, September 8th
woul be the best date. The 29th is a backup date. How does the 8th work
for you all.
I thought maybe we could the normal bbq and have a cake. Maybe for
the gift we could all put in money and buy something substanial. What
are your thoughts?  kari


Mark -- Thanks very much for this information.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Breese, Mark
Sent:	Monday, May 14, 2001 9:44 AM
To:	Fairley, David
Cc:	McMichael, Ed; Weldon, V Charles
Subject:	Oil Status UPdate -- response to your questions

I spoke with Doug Leach regarding your questions.  He has already contacted 4-5 suppliers/truckers and is ready to rock and roll when we know what spec. of No. 2 we need.  As such, they are all set to supply our requirement.  Doug reiterated his interest in looking at the long-term relationship we may want to build with a supplier.  He is particularly concerned if the plant switches to oil for a significant amount, supplying large quantities will be a logistical nightmare.

He agrees that we can hedge 80-90 (if not 100%) of the commodity risk by buying the Gulf Coast contract (there is no basis traded for FL).  However, his market view is for prices to come off (they have already dropped a bit) as a result of gasoline prices cooling off.

He has scheduled the test for Vandium today.  We should get results in the next several days.


FYI.  As you know, we're attempting to find a solution to the "reasonable
review" morrass that's impeding utility forward contracting.  For that
effort, we've worked with the Portland desk to pull together some educational
materials to use with a subset of California stakeholders that's trying to
devise a solution to California's melt down.

The attached graphs show 3 scenarios for the state as a whole.
1) "do nothing"
2) for 60% of IOU short position, split the amount 50-50 and 1cover half the
amount with 10-year  fixed priced power and the other half with 5-year fixed
priced power.
3) create a portfolio with a) 25% of short position covered by 10-year fixed
priced power, b) 20% of short position covered by 5-year fixed price power,
c) 15% covered by 1-year fixed price power, d) 20% covered by May-Sept
fixed-price power, and e) 15% from the PX.

The term of each scenario is 5 years.

Because each is priced off our our curves, the average price is roughly
equivalent for each of the three portfolios.  However, the graph shows (as
one would expect) that exposure to price volatility is significantly higher
under scenario 1 compared to 2 and 3.

The goal is to use the illustrative scenarios to persuade the industry that
in the short run (i.e., immediately) the utilities should be permitted to buy
a modest amount of power under 5 and 10 terms, and those purchases (if
undertaken using a "DealBench-like" tool) ought to be "per se" reasonable.

If anyone has questions about it, or would like to discuss further, give a
call at 415.782.7822.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 12:54 PM -----

	Stephen Swain@ECT
	12/12/2000 12:38 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Portfolio file for distribution


The attached press release was released in India at 6:30 p.m. today India
time (7:00 a.m. CST) following the signing of the GSA with Ispat.

Joe Sutton signed the GSA for us in the presence of senior Indian and US
government officials including Commerce Secretary William Daley. The
Shareholders agreement was signed earlier in the day by Bobby Farris.
Negotiations re the PPA will resume next week.

The press release has been included in its entirety as an attachment by
Bloomberg while Reuters and Dow Jones have both carried brief reports on the
Ispat deal.

Thanks,

Johan


Cash P&L is now saved in Charlie directory on that path you gave me..

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ryder, Patrick
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:17 AM
To:	Weldon, V. Charles
Subject:	RE: P&L (Sheet 10-3-01)

Charlie,

Please start saving your files out to o, global_trading, finacial_trading, texas trading. I can get to that and reconcile our p&l's.

Our variation from last nights physical part of the p&l is really about $597 when you factor in the the mirant new deal valued at -$2025. We valued the texoma true up $340 different, leading me to believe we have a little diff. in starting positions. I am requesting access to all the global trading files so I can see what you are using for the position. The remaining variance is due to an imbalance on both Katy and Texoma for the 1st (Katy 10,000, Texoma -10,000). Collectively, you are balanced but do have 1/day of risk at each location, which amounted to $200.

So, we are pretty close on the p&l. I just need to verify your starting positions to confirm/reconcile our true-ups.

Pat

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Weldon, V. Charles
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:26 PM
To:	Ryder, Patrick
Subject:	P&L (Sheet 10-3-01)

 << File: Cash P&L.xls >>


Jeff,

Once again, thank you very much for your advice on gas.

However, while your advise was sound in principal ("threatening a $3.00 upside
against a $0.50 downside, at the $5.00 level"), next time let me know if your
going to be off as much as 40%( we hit a $5.00 upside instead of $3.00).

Thanks for the help.

Bryan


---------------------- Forwarded by Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron on 05/25/2001
08:30 AM ---------------------------

Stanley Horton
05/25/2001 08:38 AM
To: MARY TURINA/ENRON@enronxgate
cc:

Subject: PGE Position Report

I would appriciate if you would send to me each week the PGE Position
Report.  Also, at your convenience I would like to spend some time via
telephone to run through the report to make sure I understand just what is
being reported.  I'll have my assistant call to set-up the phone call early
next week.

Also, to whom in Risk Management do you send the position report?

Thanks.


Attached is the latest term sheet for Pasadena for April through August.  Just wanted to share with you what we were going to be doing with them in the near term.  Ann, could you help me get this deal into the system?  PLEASE let me know if any of you have any questions.

Thanks,

Kim


Give the gift of The Wall Street Journal at special holiday prices! Click here: http://subscribe.wsj.com/giveagift

In response to requests from many of our readers, The Wall Street Journal is offering a special holiday gift rate to you and a select group of our valued subscribers.

As a gift for a colleague, an aspiring entrepreneur, or a special family member, The Journal is a natural choice around the holiday season. It provides rock solid perspectives on the markets, quick studies on today's trends and street signs, and incisive arguments from the people at the moving edge of our economy.

The Journal is also a daily reminder of your thoughtfulness and one of the smartest gifts you could give. You can give a gift of 6 months or a year and save more than 40% in either case. Simply check your choice of gift terms and fill in the information. For example, 26 weeks is regularly $89; your cost is just $49, 1 year is regularly $175; your cost is just $95!

Visit http://subscribe.wsj.com/giveagift today to take advantage of this special opportunity.

Happy Holidays,

A. Lewis
for The Wall Street Journal

Interested in giving the gift of Barron's this holiday season? Click here to learn about our special holiday rates: http://www.barronsmag.com/giveagift2

 This message is being sent by The Wall Street Journal.
Occasionally, we use e-mail for fast, paperless communications
with our customers.  If you do not wish to receive these notices in the
future, please visit our Web site at:
http://subscribe.wsj.com/cgi-bin/go.cgi?ID=EJ&A=061301591646
and indicate your preferences.

K-6-728680-3642017-2-78299-US2-8F4243C2


SKILLING, JEFFREY K,

You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed by Friday, May 25, 2001.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

Employee Name:
CONNOLLY, LISA
JOYCE, MARY


I understood the "validation" process to be a fairly flexible name applied to
a wide variety of approaches.  What we specifically discussed, and what scott
s. left prepared and committed to do, involved looking at individual curves,
the assumptions underlying them and some process (yet to be specifically
determined) for addressing updates.  We agreed to start with the top 20
curves and especially those which are involved in the upcoming deals.

I think the confusion is in what the term validation means.  In the ENA
context it means one thing; in this context it means what we discussed (which
was in Jim's memo and, as you'll recall, we went through point-by-point).
Let's just get this done.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 04/18/2000 05:10
PM ---------------------------

James D Steffes
04/18/2000 03:46 PM
To: Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES
cc: john Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Gorte@ECT, Rick
Buy@ECT, Scott Gahn@EES, Jeremy Blachman@EES, Scott Stoness@EES, Karen L
Barbour@ECT, Steven J Kean@EES, Harry Kingerski@EES, Gia
Maisashvili/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EES - RAC Deal Approval Meeting

Scott --

We should talk about what was agreed to at the meeting.

My discussions with others indicated that both (a) a curve validation process
and (b) a deal-by-deal review would be undertaken.  The deal-by-deal review
is especially critical during the implementation of a structured curve
validation process.  In addition, even when the curve validation process is
fully up and running, we should continue looking at major position impacts in
new transactions.  There are many curves to review.  It seems reasonable to
look at the critical rate curves as appropriate.

Let me know.

Jim Steffes

Scott Gahn
04/15/2000 07:25 AM
To: John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: David Gorte@ECT, Rick Buy@ECT, Scott Gahn@EES, Jeremy Blachman@EES, Scott
Stoness@EES, Karen L Barbour@ECT, Steven J Kean@EES, James D Steffes@EES,
Harry Kingerski@EES, Gia Maisashvili/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: EES - RAC Deal Approval Meeting

In the interest of clarity:  It was agreed that ongoing curve validation
consistent with that followed on wholesale curves would be instituted.  It
was further agreed that certain information would be provided by Scott
Stoness to get this process going.  Such ongoing validation should make the
impractical deal-by-deal review described below both redundant and
unnecessary.

I assume the list below did not contemplate the type of curve validation
process we discussed and agreed to at the meeting.

To: David Gorte@ECT, Rick Buy@ECT, Scott Gahn@EES, Jeremy Blachman@EES, Scott
Stoness@EES, Karen L Barbour@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean@EES, James D Steffes@EES, Harry Kingerski@EES, Gia
Maisashvili/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: EES - RAC Deal Approval Meeting

As mentioned in yesterday's meeting, below are Jim Steffes' comments relative
to what information should be presented to Government Affairs when EES brings
a deal to RAC.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
04/14/2000 02:53 PM ---------------------------

James D Steffes@EES
04/09/2000 12:11 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, John Neslage
cc: Marcia A Linton/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: EES - RAC Deal Approval Meeting

I received word late last week that Dave Gorte (works for Rick Buy) is
setting up a meeting to discuss the process under which EES will have its
deals considered by RAC.

I think that we should argue that the following package of information be
pre-assembled and provided to Govt Affairs when EES brings a deal to RAC:

1. List of each position by utility and by rate class within the deal

2. Regulated Rate forecasts by utility and by rate class for each position in
the deal.  Not just the "scalars" but also the absolute $/Mwh.

3. For each impacted position, the key assumptions contained within the
curves -
 a. deregulation date (if any)
 b. stranded cost roll-off date (if any)
 c. standard offer end date (if any)
 d. other rate reduction dates and amounts (if any)

4. Revenue side or Cost side contract terms that impact the deal (for
example, movement in pricing terms given some event)

I also think that we should have at least 3 working days to review this
package.

If anyone can think of anything else that would ease our analysis, I would be
game.

Thanks.

JDS


Trina:
Thanks.  Do you have her number?  Hope you have a great Thanksgiving

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	"Chandler, Trina" <tchandler@velaw.com>
	11/21/00 10:11 AM

		 To: "St. Clair, Carol (Enron)" <carol.st.clair@enron.com>
		 cc: "Duckers, Sarah" <sduckers@velaw.com>
		 Subject: FW: Nanny recommendation

 Carol -- I came across this message from Sarah Duckers last night as
I was cleaning out my e-mails.  I don't know if you have found a nanny yet
or if Sarah's fill-in nanny is still available but I thought I would pass
this on just in case.  Hope all is well.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Duckers, Sarah
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:48 PM
> To: Garner, Kathryn (MDCK); 'Jane Shoppell'; 'Karen DuPont'; 'Laurie
> Holley, MD'; 'Lori Owen'; 'MOELLER, KATHRYN'; 'Terrie Sechrist'; All
> Female Attorneys - HOU
> Subject: Nanny recommendation
>
> I had a fill-in nanny this week for my little boy, while my nanny was
> attending to a family emergency.  This lady was very good, and is looking
> for full-time employment.  If you know of someone who is looking for a
> nanny for their child/children, give me a call for more information.
>
> Sarah Duckers.
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


Effective March 1, 2001 Enron North America (CO 0413) employees will begin
using XMS (Expense Management System) to process employee expense
reimbursements.

XMS is a web based employee expense reimbursement system which will provide
the following benefits;

? More timely reimbursements to employees
? User friendly Web access
? Ability for employee or designated administrative assistant to submit
expense reimbursement
? Greater efficiency and lower cost
? Efficiently integrated with the current SAP accounting system

This system will REPLACE our current manual expense reimbursement process.
All employee expense reimbursements for ENA employees submitted after March
1, 2001 should be done via XMS.

Following are details regarding system access, training and support.

To access the system go to the Enron Home Page and type http://xms.enron.com
in the address field.

LOGON ID
Enter your personnel number (P number).   HR information is loaded
automatically into XMS, but an incomplete load may mean that some people's
IDs are not updated.  If your P number doesn't work, try using your first
initial and last name (lower case).  If you can't log in to the system, go to
the IT Central web page from the Enron home page and select Services>Security
Requests>eRequest or call (713) 853-5536.

PASSWORD
The first time you log in, the password is upper case ENRON.  The system will
guide you through confirming your personal information and changing your
password.  The Enron Code of Ethics prohibits the sharing of passwords and
logging on as another person.  Please observe Enron,s policy.  If you have
forgotten your password, call the Resolution Center at (713) 853-1411.

TRAINING
Go to the IT Central web page.  Select Services>Training.  Click on
"Schedules" in the North America column, and go to the XMS Workshop schedule
to choose your class.  If no classes are listed, call the training department
and place your request at (713) 853-1816.  Those in outlying locations and
those who prefer on-line training can use LEAP by signing on to isc.enron.com
and clicking on "training and education," then LEAP (shown as a link).  Use
xms (lower case) as the User ID and Password.

DOCUMENTATION
Step by Step documentation is also available from IT Central web page.
Select Services>Training. Click on "Documentation" in the North America
column and choose XMS User's Guide from the list.

APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Call the ISC help desk at (713) 345-4SAP (4727). Do not call Accounts Payable
with questions about how to use the system or with issues regarding
electronic pre-populated data.


Attached are a clean and blacklined revised version of Attachment J to the
proposed ICAP Manual that will come before BIC on May 24. The Attachment J
circulated last week had some glitches in it. This Attachment J has been
blacklined against the one circulated last week so you can readily see the
differences.

I apologize for any inconvenience.

Kathy Robb
Hunton & WIlliams
212.309.1128
krobb@hunton.com

>
>
>
>
>  <<Clean Att. J for May 24 BIC Meeting(v1).DOC>>  <<BLACKLINED Att. J - 5
> 17 against NEW 5 22(v1).DOC>>

 - Clean Att. J for May 24 BIC Meeting(v1).DOC
 - BLACKLINED Att. J - 5 17 against NEW 5 22(v1).DOC


========================================================
Message Receipt Confirmation
========================================================

Thank you for contacting us!

-------------------------------
Message Reference Number: 2898128
Subject: Returns~
Received: 10/13/01, 03:36:PM
-------------------------------

We appreciate your patience -- we're making every effort to respond to
your e-mail as soon as possible .  Due to the volume of email messages
we receive, please allow 2 business days for a response should one be
necessary.

Thanks again!
Customer Service


Ed, the recent work we have done on options models should be able to assist in this valuation.  Can we get together and make this a priority?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 6:35 PM
To:	Black, Don; McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject:	PG&E

Let me know if you guys have come up with a value for the PG&E flex deal.

Thanks,
Mike Grigsby


check these out...


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001
12:38 PM ---------------------------

"Ryan Lee" <ralee@rmi.net> on 04/27/2001 12:28:28 PM
To: "Nick Woods \(E-mail\)" <lusciouswoods@yahoo.com>,
<matthew.lenhart@enron.com>, "Jayson Gill" <dodebag@hotmail.com>, "Jason
Klimek" <klimjas@chrobinson.com>, "JAKE Istnick" <jakeistnick@hotmail.com>,
"Haig Newton" <hnewton@analytic-solutions.com>, "David Shaw"
<davidishaw@yahoo.com>, <danielkbrock@hotmail.com>, "Claude.Aldridge"
<Claude.Aldridge@yellowglobal.com>, "Brian Beggs" <brbeggs@hotmail.com>,
"Andy Patton" <andy.patton@wcom.com>
cc:

Subject: Coors fiels Baby!

Welcome to the D-town.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee, Ryan" <ryan.lee@iccx.net>
To: <ralee@rmi.net>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:06 AM
Subject: FW: Pac bell (Sf)

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mcwhite, John [mailto:JMcwhite@BreeceHill.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:07 AM
> To: 'St. D'; 'Stan'; Lee, Ryan; 'Donnay'; 'Cox'; 'Red Eye'; Williams,
> Zach; 'Klimek'; 'Vic'
> Subject: FW: Pac bell (Sf)
>
>
> This is what all baseball games need. It would add a little excitement.
> Check out these chicks they are flashing the fans
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brent Ryerson [SMTP:BrentR@ecollege.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:50 AM
> > To: 'Mcwhite, John'
> > Subject: FW: Pac bell (Sf)
> >
> > these chics were flasing the crowd, then the ball players started
watching
> > start with pic #4
> >
> > heading out of town
> > enjoy the game this weekend, this should inspire YOU JOHNNY!!!
> >
> > RYER
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McDaniel, Patrick [mailto:PMcDaniel@dlj.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:35 AM
> > To: Brent Ryerson
> > Subject: FW:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Fraher, John
> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 8:55 AM
> > To: McDaniel, Patrick; Iturrino, Renzo; Donlon, Paul; Taffe, Patrick
> > Subject: FW:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > John M. Fraher
> > Private Client Services
> > Credit   | First
> > Suisse | Boston
> > DLJ Securities Corporation
> > 600 California Street, 20th Floor
> > San Francisco, CA 94108
> > Tel:   415-249-2285
> > Fax:  415-249-2237
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Platt, Mark [mailto:mplatt@pacgrow.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 8:35 AM
> > To: Cuffee (E-mail); Damon Williams (E-mail); Jman (E-mail); Jimmy
> > Connelly (E-mail); Mark Chielpegian (E-mail); Mike Reinardy (E-mail)
> > Cc: Matt McMahon (E-mail)
> > Subject: FW:
> >
> >
> > these are the chicks from that game we were at INSANE RACKS,,,,,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Perkins, Ben
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:30 AM
> > > To: Milstein, George; Swindle, Chris; Stone, KC; Mulcahy, Mark; Platt,
> > > Mark; Harrison, Sandy; Schatz, Steve; Svendsen, Peter; Alger, Brian
> > > Subject: FW:
> > >
> > > A little raw SF talent at PacBell
> > >
> > > _______________________________________
> > > Ben Perkins
> > > Associate
> > > Investment Banking
> > > Pacific Growth Equities
> > > Four Maritime Plaza
> > > San Francisco, CA 94111
> > > ph (415) 274-6895
> > > fax (415) 274-6849
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  <<flash3.JPG>>  <<flash1.JPG>>  <<flash2.JPG>>  <<barry_group.JPG>>
> >
> >  <<flash3.JPG>>  <<flash1.JPG>>  <<flash2.JPG>>  <<barry_group.JPG>>
>
>

 - flash3.JPG
 - flash1.JPG
 - flash2.JPG
 - barry_group.JPG


[IMAGE][IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

	MIKE'S WEATHER FOR 5/14/2001

	?

	[IMAGE]

	?
	[IMAGE]

	YOUR WEATHER FORECAST

	Your Weather Forecast for Houston, TX  (Your Local Forecast)

	DETAILED FORECAST

	Today: Partly cloudy. High 86. Light S to SE winds.

	Tonight: Mostly clear. Low 67. Calm winds.

	Tomorrow: Partly cloudy. High 87. Winds S 5 to 10 mph.

	Tomorrow night: Clear. Low 68. Light S winds.
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	7-DAY FORECAST

	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	TODAY
	[IMAGE]
	Partly Cloudy
	hi?86oF
	lo?67oF
	[IMAGE]

	TUE
	[IMAGE]
	Partly Cloudy
	hi?87oF
	lo?68oF
	[IMAGE]

	WED
	[IMAGE]
	Partly Cloudy
	hi?90oF
	lo?70oF
	[IMAGE]

	THU
	[IMAGE]
	Partly Cloudy
	hi?90oF
	lo?71oF
	[IMAGE]

	FRI
	[IMAGE]
	Partly Cloudy
	hi?90oF
	lo?73oF
	[IMAGE]

	SAT
	[IMAGE]
	Partly Cloudy
	hi?90oF
	lo?74oF
	[IMAGE]

	SUN
	[IMAGE]
	Mostly Cloudy
	hi?89oF
	lo?70oF

	  ?
	Doppler Radar Maps
	Current Conditions
	Regional Audio Forecast
	Regional Severe Weather Alerts
	[IMAGE]
	If this is not your city's weather, please click here.

	LOCAL LINKS

	Planner
	Spring is in the air.  If you intend to spend time outdoors, click on one of
the links below to plan your day.

	Local Links
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	 Ski

	Find Local Ski Resorts

	Check the Snowfall Forecast

	Snow Quality Map

	 [IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	 Planner

	Schoolday Forecast

	Aviation Index

	Home and Garden

	 [IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	Your registered screen name with Weather.com is MIKE.
	Weather.com emails are never sent unsolicited.??
	If you would like to unsubscribe, please click  here or send an email with
unsubscribe in the subject line to weather@lifeminders.com.

	?

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	[IMAGE]

	weather.com
	INTERACTIVE
	Weather On Your Phone?

	Weather On Your PDA?

	Talk to Us
	?

	MIKE's weather.com
	Update My weather  Profile

	Change My Registration Information

	Unsubscribe

	Contact Us

	Privacy Policy

?	[IMAGE]	?


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000 08:27
AM ---------------------------

Elizabeth L Hernandez
04/28/2000 08:20 AM
To: Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberly S Olinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole Cortez/DEN/ECT@Enron, Paul T
Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron
cc: Hillary Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: West Desk & Denver Desk

Effective immediately Hillary Mack will be taking over the Deal Validation
piece of the West and Denver Desk.  I would appreciate it very much if
everyone would please call Hillary at X3-3425 for all issues pertaining to
the West desk and the Denver desk.

Randy, please forward this message on to the Logistics group.

Effective May 1st I wll be doing the Deal Validation piece on the East Desk.

Thanks again!


Please find attached the programs for the two back-two-back conferences on
real options at UCLA (you may also download them from www.realoptions.org and
www.rogroup.com ). The two conferences are separate but complementary events.
The first conference, co-sponsored with Accenture and Morgan Stanley Dean
Witter, on July 11-12, is a professional conference on Real Options Valuation
in the Connected Economy: High Tech, Pharma, Energy, Corporate Valuation &
Strategic/Portfolio Management. For information and online registration see
www.rogroup.com.

The second is the 5th Annual International Conference on Real Options: Theory
Meets Practice (the annual industry event where academics and practitioners
get together to share the latest developments on theory and applications),
co-organized with The Anderson School at UCLA on July 13-14. For information
and online registration see www.realoptions.org

Between the two complementary events, we are pleased to present an extensive
array of practitioner and cutting-edge academic presentations, sharing of
experiences by corporate executives, and panel discussions by experts from
leading organizations and universities. Our keynote speaker this year will be
Eduardo S. Schwartz of UCLA.

Interested participants must register for the conference online
www.realoptions.org) and indicate hotel preferences by May 31 or ASAP.

We look forward to seeing you at this exciting event, and would appreciate if
you share this with interested colleagues.

Lenos Trigeorgis

 - 5thmanagerialconferenceJuly2001.doc
 - 5thacademicconferenceJuly2001.doc


Thanks!!!  I'm happy to attend!

--Christie.


Date:	August 21, 2001

To:	Entergy Transmission Customers

Subject: 	Modification (REDIRECT) on a firm basis.

Effective 10:00 AM, Wednesday August 22, 2001, Entergy will begin accepting partial term REDIRECTS on a firm basis.  Entergy believes the guidelines listed below are necessary to manage the redirects on a firm basis, and successfully allow the recalled portion of the original reservation to become available for other customers to purchase. If you have any questions, please call David McNeill at 870-541-3931 or Cameron Warren at 870-543-5497.

Section 22.2 - Modification on a Firm Basis

a) As available, Entergy's transmission customers may modify the source/sink or POR/POD of confirmed firm point-to-point service on a firm basis at no additional cost per section 22.2 and Attachment 'M' of the OATT.

b) Requests to modify on a firm basis will be treated as a new request for firm service.

c) Requests to modify on a short-term firm basis must be submitted via OASIS using the REDIRECT function no later than 12:00 noon two days prior to the start of the redirected service. Requests to modify on a long-term firm basis (twelve months or longer) will be processed according to the current business practices for original long-term firm service.

d) Request to modify on a firm basis must be pre-confirmed.

e) The REDIRECT request must include the assignment number of the original request in the related reference field.

f) Requests to modify on a firm basis must specify the exact same capacity as the original request.

g) Requests to modify on a firm basis must not be for an interval of the original reservation in which a previously submitted schedule exists.

h) Requests to modify on a firm basis may be submitted in daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly service increments.

i) Requests to modify on a firm basis must be within the time interval of original reservation (the REDIRECT cannot start before the original start date or end after the original end date).

j) Upon acceptance of a REDIRECT request, the customer loses their rights to the redirected interval of the original request and Entergy will release the original reserved capacity back to the market. If the customer wishes to revert back to the original path they must submit another REDIRECT subject to the same guidelines as all other new REDIRECT requests.

k) When applicable, rollover rights will be given on the original reservation only.


thanks for the info and good luck.

David P Dupre
01/02/2001 10:58 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: update

Hi, I have moved to a new group. My replacement's name is Jason Fischer at
5-3207.

David


http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************

Read SCIENTECH's free SourceBook Weekly article: "Australia: Jewel in the
Crown for Some U.S. Investors" at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, October 9, 2000
Oil and Natural-Gas Shortages: Will They Create a Winter of Discontent?
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

U.S. retail energy fuel costs, already high by historical standards, are
expected to remain high this winter due to crude prices that are projected
to remain at levels unseen since the Gulf War, said the Department of Energy
on Friday. In addition, households that use natural gas are likely to see
the largest year-on-year percentage increase in their bills as well, according
to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). The agency said U.S. residents
can expect heating expenditures to increase by 25 percent for heating oil
and propane and 40 percent for natural gas.

ANALYSIS: Despite common belief to the contrary, there is a direct correlation
between the price cycles of oil and natural gas. The fact that there are
legitimate concerns surrounding the availability of both power sources
gives validity to the warnings of price increases this winter. When fuel
prices are low and natural-gas supplies are abundant, there is arguably
little connection between the two. However, the present situation as we
head into winter is the exact opposite*high oil prices and a comprised
supply of natural gas, leaving the two unquestionably intertwined. As energy
users opt to switch from oil to natural gas, this affects natural gas supply
and raises gas prices.

How did we arrive at this alarming situation, which may have been justifiably
labeled an "energy crisis"? Regarding oil, in 1998 the worldwide oil industry
witnessed a decline in oil prices*spawned in part by the economic problems
in Asia*which hit a low of less than $10 a barrel in March 1998. Oil producers
voluntarily initiated decreased production, which unsurprisingly started
a swift climb in prices in 1999, as demand started to increase in a
rejuvenated
Asia and the United States. Together, this has created a volatile mix of
substantially higher crude oil prices, lower inventories and increased
demand. Even though OPEC has made promises of up to 1.1 million additional
barrels of crude oil per day*a result of political pressure put on it by
the United States and other countries*it may not be able to force its members
to increase production, as obviously it's in the best interest of oil
producers
to keep supplies tight and prices high. In addition, even if they materialize,
these increases promised by OPEC may not be enough to meet growing demand.
This is alarming as the United States is very reliant on foreign oil, which
already accounts for about half of U.S. oil use.

The high price of oil has sent many customers looking for natural gas,
only to find that it is also in questionable supply. Most reports suggest
that natural gas heats about 55 percent of all U.S. homes. The imbalance
between supply and demand found in the oil industry is also found in natural
gas, resulting in a projected 20 to 40 percent increase in heating bills
this winter. Over the last month, prices for natural-gas futures have climbed
to record levels of more than $5 per million Btus. Yet, unlike oil, most
of the blame placed on low supply for natural gas focuses on the United
States rather than other countries. A reported 60 percent of federal lands
have been placed off limits to natural-gas drillers, leaving as many as
200 million acres (out of a total of 1.5 billion) available but restricted
for natural-gas expansion. The Clinton administration and environmental
groups have been fiercely protective of federal reserve lands and prohibited
drilling for natural gas (or oil) in states like Alaska, where some 36
trillion cubic feet of gas is known to be locked underground. At the same
time, EPA standards have become so pro-natural gas over the last decade
that few coal-fired plants have been built in the last 10-20 years, placing
an increasingly high dependence on natural gas, even though alternative
fuels are not necessarily available to serve as a substitute.

Given the connection between oil and natural gas, any successful attempt
to lower oil prices would in turn help to lower natural-gas prices. The
ability to rely more heavily on oil once again would decrease the need
for fuel switching, thus reducing the present burden on natural gas. Toward
this end, in late September President Clinton authorized the release of
30 million barrels of crude oil from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve
(SPR), the nation's emergency oil stockpile. The president's action caused
additional alarm in some groups who said that the need to tap into emergency
supplies so early in the season signaled real trouble with oil supplies.
Others said the 30 million barrels would do little to ease the problem,
and that it would take between 2 and 3 million barrels a day for one month
to reduce current crude oil prices.

So what is the solution? As noted, the issue has become politically polarized.
Within their campaign proposals, Gov. Bush proposes spending $7.1 billion
to open up U.S. energy resources and reduce dependence on foreign sources.
Specifically, Bush has proposed, among other things, opening 8 percent
of the Arctic National Wildlife Range, which probably contains about 10
billion barrels of oil. Vice President Gore opposes drilling in federal
land, and instead aims to protect the U.S. environment, increase reliance
on low-pollution fuels and focus on energy-efficiency / lower consumption
programs. Articulating the Democratic position on this issue, Senator Joe
Lieberman made the following comments last week in the vice presidential
debate: "There are more resources within the United States. If we can get
three miles more per gallon from our cars, we'll get a million*we'll save
a million barrels of oil a day, which is exactly what the refuge, at its
best, in Alaska, would produce(We've got to develop fuel cells, alternative
energy. We've got to encourage people to conserve..."

But what is the answer now, as winter fast approaches? Unfortunately, natural
gas has no emergency fund like the SPR which it can tap into. The degree
to which the oil/gas supply issue will have a dramatic impact this winter
will depend on the weather. The colder the temperature, the greater the
need for heating power sources, which will drive up the cost for both oil
and natural gas. Meteorologists are predicting a tough winter, one that
in actuality may be near normal but will seem colder after the four past
winters, which were unusually mild due to La Nia. Already, temperatures
are dipping to surprising lows across the country. Considering that it
is only early October, warnings are continuing to accumulate that supply
will be stretched to meet demand, which unquestionably will drive up the
price of energy bills.

Looking forward, much of what happens from here will depend on which candidate
is elected in November. Most within the energy industry agree that more
production is the only answer to supply concerns. Yet, expanding production
will not be an easy task, especially in an election year. This is not an
issue that is gaining high priority within Congress, as politicians aim
to end their session before the presidential election. With such exceedingly
opposed candidates, the impact that the imminent election will have on
future energy policy cannot be underestimated.

==============================================================

SCIENTECH can help you find the answers you need.  From simple questions
to complex problems, our experts and consultants will get results. Learn
more about our six service areas at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/About_RCI.html

===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products including e-commerce and telecom in the electric utility
industry. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free, daily
IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their full name and
email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


Another FAS 133 Offsite meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, Feb 29 (all
day).  Sally asked me to forward this to you - would like you to attend if at
all possible.  Scott, this is an FYI for you - I know you will be overseas on
this date.

Patti
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/18/2000 09:53 AM
---------------------------

	Bob Butts @ ENRON
	02/16/2000 05:31 PM

Sent by: Dortha Gray@ENRON
To: Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paige B Grumulaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron
Baker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger G Leworthy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
James J Brown/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Patty Grutzmacher/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Kimberly Scardino/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Becker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kent Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Wanda Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, John B
Echols/HOU/EES@EES, Rodney Faldyn/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tod Lindholm/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mark E Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cassandra
Schultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey E
Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, P
Sreekumar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Shirley Tijerina/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margarite
Cunningham/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carmella
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicole Scott/LON/ECT@ECT, Melinda McCarty/HOU/EES@EES,
Shelley Grover/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Bobbie
Moody/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandy Lewelling/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Karen Myer/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Norma
Petry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Araceli
Romero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Leigh Ann Van
Houten/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: FAS 133 Offsite

Please see attached memo.


Hello all! Happy Monday!

For Timekeeping purposes, please let me know the distribution of your work hours (to EPMI/VM, EES, ENW, etc.) for the pay period 5/1/02-5/15/02.

Thanks,
Kathy


November 17, 2000

Your Invitation to e-Freedom.  Gobble It Up!

********* southwest.com e-Freedom Sale *********

Who: southwest.com Customers.

What: Internet Specials for $99/$109 or less each way.

Where: All cities with scheduled Southwest Airlines
 service.

When: 7-day advance purchase beginning
 at 7:00 AM CST on November 17, 2000 through
 December 1, 2000, midnight Pacific Time.
 Travel beginning November 28, 2000 through
 March 30, 2001.

Why: To give you the Freedom to move about the country.

How: Go to http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

***************************************************************
Another sale in one week?
It's like one more serving of mom's pumpkin pie.

Here are the details of the southwest.com Internet Special:
*Tuesday, Wednesday, and Saturday $99 or less each
way Internet Specials are available only on southwest.com
and may be combined with any other fare type.

*Monday, Thursday, Friday, and Sunday $109 or less each
way Internet Specials are available only on southwest.com
and may be combined with any other fare type.

All with the following restrictions:

*7-day advance purchase
*Travel November 28, 2000 through March 30, 2001.
 Florida markets will be blacked out March 15-30, 2001.
*Purchase beginning November 17 through
 December 1, 2000, midnight Pacific Time.
*southwest.com Internet Specials are available one-way or
 may be combined with any other fare.
 When combining with another fare, the
 most restrictive fare rules apply.
*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers),
 once purchased, will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of up to $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip.

southwest.com Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. *Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

Seats are limited and won't be available on some
flights that operate during very busy travel times
and holiday periods.

Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
full unrestricted fare.

************ SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION **************
Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and resubscribe in order
to continue receiving Southwest Airlines e-mail updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

***************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers1 as: [sscott5@enron.com]
To unsubscribe, send email to
leave-special-offers1-99587671F@mail.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


The meeting about the pool will be at Creekside Thursday, January 10 (not
February).  Sorry.  (Thanks, Janice, for catching the error.


And --FYI I  Dont do pictures!!!! ever   -


---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
07/05/2000 04:58 PM ---------------------------

Bob Klein
07/05/2000 04:57 PM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: UNIFY TO SAP INTERFACES

We interfaced UNIFY to SAP three times today. Interface number one (8:40 AM)
was error free. The second interface (Noon) created duplicate invoices for
those sent in our first interface. The problem that caused the duplication
was that the flag in UNIFY that prevents invoices from being sent to SAP
after they have already been interfaced did not work. The problem was
corrected before out third interface at 3:15 PM. In the 3:15 interface, one
error occurred --- a counterparty was set up in Global as intercompany that
should be third party. This error will be corrected before our next interface
on 7/6 AM.

Overall, I was pleased at how well the interfaces worked today and how fast
the SAP and UNIFY teams responded to our issues.

Bob


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 11/27/2000 02:54
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com>                           10/31/2000
01:29 PM

To:
cc: "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>, "Onukogu, Ernest"
<Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>
Subject: DJ Palo Verde Electricity Price Index

 - Palo.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 11/27/2000 02:54
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com>                           10/31/2000
01:28 PM

To:
cc: "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>, "Onukogu, Ernest"
<Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>
Subject: COB

 - Cob.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 11/27/2000 02:54
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com>                           10/31/2000
01:29 PM

To:
cc: "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>, "Onukogu, Ernest"
<Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>
Subject: DJ Mid-Columbia Electricity Price Index

 - MidC.xls
---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 11/27/2000 02:54
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  djenergy <djenergy@dowjones.com>                           10/31/2000
01:28 PM

To:
cc: "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>, "Onukogu, Ernest"
<Ernest.Onukogu@dowjones.com>
Subject: MeadMarketplace

 - MeadMktplace.xls


All:

Attached is a draft of our Answer in Opposition to the PX's February 26
Request for Clarification, on in the Alternative, Request for Rehearing, of
FERC's Feb. 14 Order Rejecting its proposal to relax its creditworthiness
requirements.  If you have any comments or revisions, please let me know as
soon as possible.  You may contact me by return email, or by phone at (202)
828-7623.

Kim

 - 139200.DOC
 - #139200 v2 - ANSWER TO PX CLARIFICATION REQUEST.wpd


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000
06:47 PM ---------------------------

webmaster@cera.com on 07/14/2000 10:04:13 PM
To: vince.j.kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Monthly Briefing: The Pressure Remains - CERA Alert

**********************************************************************
CERA Alert: Sent Fri, July 14, 2000
**********************************************************************

Title: Monthly Briefing: The Pressure Remains
Author: N. American Gas Team
E-Mail Category: Alert
Product Line: North American Gas ,
URL: http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/eprofile.cfm?u=5166&m=1272 ,

Pressure in the North American gas markets remains intense, despite moderate
summer weather that so far has allowed storage injections to average over 10
billion cubic feet (Bcf) per day. High injection rates have provided
occasional relief for prices, but summer is far from over. The absolute level
of storage inventories remains critical, and the prices should stay above the
$4.00 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) level through August. The
competition between power generation and storage for supply will continue,
and gas prices must remain high enough to discourage marginal end-use demand
and allow low storage inventories to build. CERA expects an average price of
$4.20 per MMBtu at the Henry Hub for August (see Table 1), which will result
in continued burning of residual fuel oil by the Atlantic Coast dual-fuel
market and continued ammonia plant shutdowns, which began during the May and
June price increases.

Although continued strong storage injections would take some pressure off the
gas market, a shift to a lower pricing plane--below $4.00 per MMBtu--depends
on sustained mild summer weather. CERA expects gas demand for power
generation to climb through the end of July and into August, and higher
temperatures and power loads will limit supply that is available for
injections. The pressure in the market is likely to tighten over the weeks to
come, and the market will remain vulnerable to price spikes above $4.50 per
MMBtu through August and September.

Gas Storage--Not Yet Enough
Despite recent high storage injection rates, storage inventories are not high
enough to ensure that supplies will reach adequate levels for next winter. An
end of mild weather in the Midwest and Northeast and seasonally intense heat
in the Southwest would cause injection rates to decline significantly over
the remainder of July and into August. The result would be injections
averaging approximately 9.0 Bcf per day for July, largely owing to higher
rates early in the month, and 7.0 Bcf per day for August (see Table 2).

These rates would keep the year-over-year inventory deficit above 350 Bcf for
July and August, with inventories on a path to reach between 2.7 and 2.8
trillion cubic feet (Tcf) by the end of October, still an all-time low level
for the beginning of winter. Reaching even this level would require at least
two of the following to occur: a continuation of quite mild weather, little
or no hurricane activity in the Gulf of Mexico, or warm weather through
October. As a result, the pressure is likely to remain high in the gas market
at least through August.

Regional Markets--The Topock Premium
Buoyed by strong regional power demand and high utilization rates on
pipelines into California, Topock continues to be the highest pricing point
in North America. High power loads in the West are supporting other prices in
the region, but supply growth and pipeline capacity constraints out of the
Rockies and high pipeline utilization rates between the San Juan Basin and
California have maintained extremely wide differentials between those markets
and California. California should remain strong, and CERA expects some modest
strengthening in Rockies and San Juan basis differentials during July and
August with increasing Pacific Northwest gas demand for power generation (see
Table 3).

CERA's outlook by region follows:

* Rockies. Continued strong supply growth in the Rockies is challenging
pipeline capacity out of the region, and differentials have come increasingly
under pressure this summer. CERA expects some modest recovery in Rockies
differentials as hydroelectric generation on the Pacific Northwest declines.
Differentials should average $0.55 per MMBtu for August.

* San Juan. CERA expects continued strong power loads in the West to keep San
Juan prices near current differential levels. August differentials should
average $0.35 per MMBtu for August.

* Permian and Mid-Continent. Hotter weather and higher power loads in Texas
have already strengthened differentials at the Permian Basin, and that
tightening should hold through August. The Mid-Continent should continue to
price at a discount to Permian supplies.

* Chicago. Chicago prices have held just above $0.05 above the Henry Hub for
much of July, a condition CERA does not expect to change significantly during
August. Chicago should average $0.06 above the Henry Hub.

* Northeast markets. Mild weather in the Northeast quickly cooled price
premiums from the mid-$0.40s to the mid-$0.20s from early to mid-July. With
hot weather still likely to return, however, New York prices for August
should average $0.32 above the Henry Hub.

Canadian Markets--Western Supply No Longer in Decline?
Although TransCanada flows are down, the strong market overall and wide
differentials have resulted in increased flows on PGT (up 300 million cubic
feet [MMcf] per day year-over-year). Domestic demand is still down slightly
from last year's levels. Storage injections have picked up (in both the East
and West) and, although behind last year's, are still above the five-year
average. Western Canadian supply increased slightly on a year-over-year basis
in June; July thus far is basically running flat with last year.

The impact of the 1999 TransCanada capacity turnback and the current rate
structure is beginning to be felt in the Canadian market. It is more and more
apparent that TransCanada is becoming the swing pipeline, with flows 400 MMcf
per day below last year's levels. The effect of the difference between
contracted capacity (available to shippers at incremental cost) and
uncontracted capacity (available only on a full-cost basis) is becoming
evident. With supply filling contracted capacity on export pipes, the
inability of TransCanada to discount below the minimum interruptible rate may
be creating a two-tiered market. This shift results in a different netback
for holders of capacity (similar to the higher netback achieved by the
aggregators in the past) and those without capacity (those required to
acquire full cost transportation, or to sell at AECO). This lack of
flexibility is contributing to the wider differential between Henry Hub and
AECO (currently averaging in the high U!
S$0.70s). AECO is expected to average C$4.91 per gigajoule (US$3.52 per
MMBtu) for August.

**end**

Follow URL for PDF version of this Monthly Briefing with associated Tables.
Note: Should the above URL not work, please use the following:
http://www.cera.com/client/nag/alt/071400_15/nag_alt_071400_15_ab.html

**********************************************************************
Account Changes
To edit your personal account information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://eprofile.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Vikki Gates
Structure Consulting Group
vikki.gates@scgo.com
cell: 512.350.4020
@ERCOT: 512.248.3884

 - 161_189.zip


What's happening?  I understand you have a brand new truck.  Must be nice having money!!

I need 2 things from you.

	1.	I found the title to the 4 wheeler and I was going to change it over to you name.  What do you think?  If that's ok, how do you want your name to show up on 		the title and what address should I use?

	2.	I'm getting ready to divy up the Dow stock.  How many of Dad's shares do you have?

Last thing, send me a million dollars, I'm tired of working.


You are welcome to have soneone on the CHARM team contact Vince Kaminski at
713-853-3848.  Thanks again.

"Bertil Olsson" <olsson_bc@willis.com> on 04/24/2001 01:40:06 PM
To: James.L.Bouillion@enron.com
cc: "Carl Groth" <groth_ch@willis.com>, "Kenneth Risko" <risko_kj@willis.com>
Subject: Re: CHARM

Jim,

Thanks for the feed-back. To assist in the further development of the
product, are there any specific areas your group would like to see improved
? Based on comments made during our meeting, it sounded like your main
concern was whether or not CHARM would have the capacity to cover the very
different and complex risk areas that your company is involved in. Would
you mind if someone from our CHARM group called you or Mr. Kaminski for
some specific comments ?

Regards,

Bertil

James.L.Bouillion@enron.com on 04/24/2001 01:35:09 PM

To:   Bertil Olsson/Hou/US/WCG@WCG
cc:
bcc:

Subject:  Re: CHARM

Bertil, I again wish to thank you for the presentation on the CHARM
product.  The response from the group is that the model requires more work
before Enron could consider it as a commercial product.  Please keep me
advised as I assume that you will continue to develop the model.

James L Bouillion
04/11/2001 06:50 AM

To:   "Bertil Olsson" <olsson_bc@willis.com> @ ENRON
cc:
Subject:  Re: CHARM  (Document link: James L Bouillion)

No word yet.  I will follow up with the attendees.

Thanks for taking thje time to make the presentation.

"Bertil Olsson" <olsson_bc@willis.com> on 04/10/2001 04:07:11 PM

To:   James.L.Bouillion@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: CHARM

Jim,

Any feed-back on our meeting ? We certainly appreciated the opportunity and
the fact that the meeting was very interactive.

Regards,

Bertil

______________________________________________________________________
The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and
may be privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
this message, delete any copies held on your systems and notify the sender
immediately.  You should not retain, copy or use this email for any
purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its content to any other person.

______________________________________________________________________
The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and
may be privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy
this message, delete any copies held on your systems and notify the sender
immediately.  You should not retain, copy or use this email for any
purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its content to any other person.


good info

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 6:48 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.
Cc:	Landwehr, Susan M.
Subject:

FYI.  In case you hadn't heard, the " bailout" that Edison struck with the California PUC would allow Edison to spend up to $250MM "to hedge fuel cost risks associated with SCE's Utility Retained Generation and QF and interutility contracts."


Don,

Please advise me of your interest in Jeff's experience.

Thanks,
Johnny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pena, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Palmer, Johnny
Subject:	RE: Trading Positions at Enron

Johnny,
I have attached my resume.  I wanted to add to it the Risk Assessment and Control (RAC) application projects that I have directly worked on that have exposed me to the RAC side of the business.  I am not sure if it was relevant, however, I felt it was an important part of my motivation and interest on the trading side of Enron's business in addition to my own career objectives.  Though I recognize I have no trading experience I am seriously interested in moving in this direction.
Please let me know if you need any more information.
Thank you.
Jeff Pena

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Palmer, Johnny
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:38 AM
To:	Pena, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Trading Positions at Enron

Jeff,

Send me your resume and I'll determine if there is a fit.

Thanks,
Johnny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pena, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:36 AM
To:	Palmer, Johnny
Subject:	Trading Positions at Enron

Johnny,
I wanted to know if you might be able to share with me a little more info on the trading positions you have available.
The questions I have are :
Is there a job req. on the Working @ Enron website that would have a good job description of the available positions?
If not, what are the requirements for the position? Experience required?
Please feel free to contanct me at your earliest convenience.
Thanks,
Jeff Pe?a
ENW Intranet/Extranet Development
jeff.pena@enron.com
713-345-3511


Good news for Body Shop members! The Body Shop will reopen Monday, January 7, 2002. While we recognize that the Body Shop is a tremendous asset to all of our employees' health and wellness, we must reopen it without an Enron subsidy. Therefore, the membership fee will increase from $25 to $30 per month for all Enron employees and contractors. Spouse memberships will remain at $15 per month. Locker fees will remain at $10 per month and members may keep their current locker. (If you emptied your locker after the Body Shop closed in December, please notify the Body Shop reception desk that you would like to reoccupy it.)
The overall price increase, coupled with reduced expenses, will enable the Body Shop to reopen and remain open on a cash-neutral basis to meet creditors' requirements. Payroll deductions will be reactivated with the January 15th payroll and will include the increased fee. If you do not wish to continue your membership, please contact the Body Shop to cancel your membership via email only at <mailto:Body.Shop@enron.com>.  Membership information and enrollment forms can be accessed below:

The Body Shop's new hours will be 6:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday, and 6:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. on Friday. Saturday hours are not offered at this time.
Although laundry service has been discontinued, towels will continue to be available for your convenience. Once the ongoing membership base and associated revenues have been stabilized to support staffing and housekeeping, exercise classes will be scheduled. We anticipate exercise classes to be available within a few weeks. Massage therapy services will continue and are available by appointment by calling extension 3-3047.
Whether you are a continuing member or considering new membership, there is no better time for you to take advantage of the Body Shop and to take care of your personal health and well being than right now, at the beginning of 2002.
Your continued support is greatly appreciated.


Dear Gaylord,
How are things? I hope your long weekend went well and your were able to dodge any objects thrown your way. Any chance I could get Kate and my itinerary sent? Talk later
Regards,
Arnold Swartzamotley


Will do -- thank you very much.

Dawn
************************************************
FROM:  Dawn Scovill, Event Coordinator
DESIGNS Event Consulting
dawn@perfectmeeting.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Vince J Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: <sobotkad@kochind.com>
Cc: <dawn@perfectmeeting.com>; Vince J Kaminski
<Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; <vkaminski@aol.com>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: Presentation

>
>
> David,
>
> I am leaving for vacation this weekend and I haven't received the copy of
your
> presentation yet.
> The window during which I could make changes to my presentation is closing
very
> fast. Let's
> do the following: I shall keep my presentation as is (this means that I
shall
> use the copy of my
> presentation I sent to Dawn Scovill  and you this week). If there is an
overlap
> between our presentations, so be it.
>
> Dawn, please use the copy of my presentation I sent you earlier this week.
>
> Vince
>
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/17/2000
04:33
> PM ---------------------------
>
>
> Vince J Kaminski
> 03/16/2000 08:02 AM
>
> To:   "Dawn Scovill" <dawn@perfectmeeting.com> @ ENRON
> cc:   sobotkad@kochind.com, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
> Subject:  Re: Presentation  (Document link: Vince J Kaminski)
>
> Dawn,
>
> I met David Sobotka from Koch this morning and we talked about
coordinating our
> presentations.
> This means there will be changes intended to avoid overlaps. Sorry for
that. The
> portions of my presentation
> will survive (those about valuation paradigms) and I shall add a few more
pages
> on accounting treatment of weather derivatives
> plus more specific examples. David will cover primarily market evolution +
plus
> examples of some
> standard structures, and we shall both give more interesting examples of
> specific deals executed by our companies.
>
> I shall send you an updated version of my part next week. Let me know what
the
> deadline is.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
> "Dawn Scovill" <dawn@perfectmeeting.com> on 03/14/2000 07:53:47 AM
>
> To:   "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Presentation
>
>
> Thanks -- would you like me to include these in the conference book? or do
> you anticipate changes?
>
> Dawn
> ************************************************
> FROM:  Dawn Scovill, Conference Coordinator
> "Powerful New Ideas 2000"
> dawn@perfectmeeting.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Vince J Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> To: <dawn@perfectmeeting.com>
> Cc: Shirley Crenshaw <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>; Vince J Kaminski
> <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; Vince J Kaminski
<Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 1:56 PM
> Subject: Presentation
>
>
> >
> >
> > Dawn,
> >
> > I am sending you an electronic version of my presentation.
> >
> > Vince Kaminski
> >
> > (See attached file: fpl0400.ppt)
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


	<TITLE>Weather Inbox</TITLE>
        <base HREF="http://www.weather.com/">

                Mike's weather for 12/27/2001

                  Update Profile | Unsubscribe

                Local Outlook for

                Houston, TX

								5 DAY FORECAST

                              Hi

								Lo

                Today

                Mostly Sunny

                   64°F

                   52°F

		    Fri

                Partly Cloudy

                   67°F

                   46°F

		    Sat

                Partly Cloudy

                   65°F

                   44°F

		    Sun

                Partly Cloudy

                   60°F

                   43°F

		    Mon

                Showers

                   54°F

                   32°F

                            DETAILED FORECAST

                        Today:	 Mostly sunny. High near 64F. Winds S to SE 10 to 15 mph.

                        Tonight:	 Partly cloudy. Low near 52F. Light N to NW winds.

                        Tomorrow:	 A mix of clouds and sun. High around 67F. Winds NW 5 to 10 mph.

                        Tomorrow night:	 Mostly clear. Low near 46F. Winds near calm.

						WEATHER HEADLINES

					Buffalo gets hit again

					More lake effect snow is pummeling Buffalo

						More details

                        MAPS

                     Doppler Radar Maps

					  Other Maps

		 		 		 		 		 		 		 		 CURRENT CONDITIONS
AND 10 DAY FORECAST

                            Houston, TX

                IN THE SPOTLIGHT - Ski Features

The powder is piling up!

Introducing ski on weather.com...

Want to know what the weather is like on your favorite ski slopes?  Is the surface snow powdery, or is it packed?  Want more information on the resort?

Our newly revamped Ski section on weather.com features detailed local forecasts for ski areas worldwide with trail maps, web cams, and comprehensive resort details.  It also includes our exclusive Ski Comfort Index, that helps you decide where and when will be best for skiing.

Ski by it!

weather.com/ski

                HEALTH

Are you a human barometer?

   Changes in the weather have long been associated with joint pain, headaches and other health concerns.  weather.com's new Aches and Pains section can help you be prepared.

		Aches & Pains Features

		Air Quality Reports

		Personal Allergy Profile

                 click to enlarge

                SITE LINKS

	    For more information on additional topics choose from the following links:

                Home and Garden
                School Day
                Weather In Your Calendar

            You
              are receiving this e-mail because you requested The Weather Channel
              to send newsletters and announcements to you at mike.grigsby@enron.com.

              If you feel that you have received this message in error, or if
              you no longer wish to receive these messages, you can unsubscribe
              anytime.

              If you have any questions or concerns about how we use your personal
              information, please read our privacy
              policy.

              We welcome all feedback from our members, please
              send us your comments or questions.

              Copyright (c) 1995-2001, The Weather Channel Enterprises,
              Inc.


Gentlemen -

FYI, We have approximately 3.6 MM Mwh of net sales to New Power Company.  I am not sure what the p/l is but I think it is sizeable as most of these sales were made several months back.  I am not sure if this is on anyone's radar screen but is now on mine.  I will have the group look into p/l.

Rogers


David Maskell is Interviewing for the 24-Hour Trading, per Lloyd Will. If available please Accept and send response now, so that I can confirm with candidate, And get this taken care of for you guys.

Thanks,

Lydia

X 3-9338


That's just disgusting.  We had PF Chang's.  It was good but it keeps coming
back to visit!! Just thought you'd like to know that.

Becky Pitre
02/26/2001 01:51 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: M&C

Beenie Weenies for $6.50?  I feel better.  Thanks.
I had m&c, a banana and gatorade.  Ummmm.
B.

Robin Rodrigue
02/26/2001 01:37 PM
To: Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: M&C

Mac&Cheese huh?  Eating a light lunch?  When I was at Tech I complained about
the food one day (well actually I complained a lot, but one day I made an
official complaint).  Anyway I was telling the guy over the food service that
the food was overpriced and the quality was pathetic.  And he told me they
were actually losing money.  All I had to say to that was if you can charge
$6.50 for Beanie Weenies (actual price of an actual dish passed off as an
entree)  and lose money you must be the worst businessman in the history of
the world.  I don't think he appreiciated me sharing my opinion with him.


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 03:48 PM ---------------------------

Thomas A Martin
10/13/2000 01:56 PM
To:	Gary Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Re: Entex weather hedge

Gary,

I don't think that we will be using a weather hedge this season.  The hedges that we have used before have worked well because we have had very warm winters and have correlated very well with Entex takes.  I am not as confident in the correlation in a closer to normal temperature environment which is the forecast for this winter.

Tom

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Sounds great to me.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lisa Bills                           07/14/2000 05:00 PM

To: Matthew Berry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Humberto Cubillos-Uejbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger
Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly H
Boots/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com
cc:

Subject: WestLB Turbine Financing Closing Dinner for ENA

WestLB has invited us to a closing dinner in Houston for the $556MM
Structured Bridge Financing for ENA which closed in May.  The date of the
event is Thursday, July 27th.  Please advise at your earliest convenience if
you will be able to join the festivities.

Regards, Lisa


pretty funny stuff.  I think this makes your case stronger to have the rev.
Al as your screen saver.  He is definitely a higher quality individual.
PL


We have received an executed EEI Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated 8/7/2001 from the referenced CP, which will be scanned into Livelink.

PLEASE REPLY IF YOU NO LONGER NEED TO RECEIVE THIS EMAIL.


Glenn,

I had asked Jay and Clark to put together a closing checklist of the items
you mention below. I know that Jay and George have been in communication with
each other on the forms of some of those Exhibits.

A major incomplete item that is still in my "To Do" list is to develop the
Renewal Period Pricing Formula Exhibit for the Steam Purchase Agreements from
the notes Heather provided me. As soon as I'm done with the DASH and my Risk
Memo, I'll turn to that task.

Steve

	Glenn Wright@ENRON
	01/08/01 07:44 AM

		 To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Dwight Beach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van
Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Outstanding Issues

One additional action item.  We need to make certain that all of the
attachments and exhibits to the basic agreements between Enron and Alamac are
in order and completed.

Your timeline for the interconnection agreements shows April 1 as the target
date for the final agreement.  By what mechanism will we cap our exposure?

-glenn

Heather Kroll@ECT
01/07/2001 03:59 PM
To: Dwight Beach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Glenn
Wright/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Outstanding Issues

To all:

I've put together a list of outstanding issues that need to be resolved prior
to the Jan 19 closing.  Let me know if I've forgotten anything.

I'll be out of the office Monday through Wednesday, but can be reached by my
cell phone (713.569.1131) or pager (888.472.7841).  Also, I'll be working out
of the NY office all day on Tuesday.

Regards,

Heather


Did you do the server bounce for me?  If not, it does not have to be done by
11:30.

Faye Ellis
02/17/2000 11:10 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Global Facilites - Maintenace Request - Completed - Request ID: 01003

The following Maintenance Request has been completed:

Click on this link to view document -->