I've tried sending this 3 times.  Please see if you can figure out the
problem.  I've used the autoaddressing and his long internet address.  If all
else fails, just print and have it delivered, I guess, or send it to his
assistant.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/14/2001 01:40
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
05/14/2001 01:03 PM
To: timothy.j.detmering@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Confidentiality agreement

I've received error notices, so I'm trying again.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/14/2001 01:02
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
05/14/2001 01:00 PM
To: Mark Metts/Enron@EnronXGate, Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT
cc: John Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, W David Duran/Enron@EnronXGate, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Confidentiality agreement

Gentlemen,

I'm with EWS Legal, and I'm working with John Llodra (East Power origination)
concerning a confidentiality agreement with Ameresco.  The proposed
transaction is described as follows:

 A potential power plant site development and asset management services
related to the Island End Generation Project, a nominal  365 MW combined
cycle power generation facility, proposed to be located in Everett,
Massachusetts.

The current draft of the CA contains this language:

 From the time of the signing of this Agreement until October 1, 2001 neither
Party shall pursue the Proposed Transaction without  the participation of the
other Party, unless the other Party consents in writing or notifies the other
Party that it does not intend to   pursue the Proposed Transaction.

In accordance with policy, this issue is being submitted to you for your
review.

John can be contacted at 978 449 9936.  My extension is 57566.

Thank you,

Kay

Here is the entire CA:


Please mark your calendars for the December 11, 2000 PRC meeting to prereview
Vice Presidents in the following organizations:

Enron North America
Enron Industrial Markets
Enron Global Markets
Enron Networks
Enron South America
APACHI
CALME

The meeting will be held at the St. Regis Hotel, 1919 Briar Oaks Lane,
Houston in the Plaza Room.  The meeting is scheduled from 8:00am to 5:00pm.
For those of you who are part of the Enron Wholesale Services Group, please
plan to be there at 8:00am, as the first part of the meeting will be devoted
to discussing PRC results of groups below Vice President, and Manager to
Director/Sr. Director promotion nominations.  The Vice President rating is
scheduled to begin at approximately 9:45am.

The telephone number of the hotel is 713-840-7600.

A complete agenda and details will be forthcoming later this week.

For those of you in the organization units listed above, please be prepared
to present and discuss your Vice Presidents.

Please feel free to contact me at X36628 in Houston, should you have any
questions.

Sheila Knudsen


Jeff:

My schedule has changed, and I'll be there Thursday but not Friday.  I don't
know whether Mike will be there...he's been elusive since session ended.

See you Thursday.

Evie

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:49 PM
To: Evelyn Kahl
Subject: Meeting w/PG&E this Friday, Right after DJ's Meeting

Hi Evie:
As you know Edison is being, well, Edison about just about everything at the
PUC.  I think that we actually have some leverage with PG&E, however.  I've
helped to broker a meeting between large customers and PG&E (Tom Botorff and
Dan Richard) this Friday at 1:30 PM after DJ's meeting.  DJ and Delainey are
organizing

The (basic) idea is to see if there is some way to strike a "reasonable"
deal on the DA/cost allocation issues with PG&E, which could then be
submitted to PUC around Edison, which seems hell bent on piling as many
costs on business customers as possible.

At the first meeting, we want to spend a very brief amount of time
determining 1) what matters to people 2) where people on the issues and 3)
PG&E's willingness to deal.  The goal is to find out if there's any room for
a deal.  Should not take a long time.

I hope you can attend, since the meeting will be significantly less
productive ify ou're not there, and who knows, it may lead to something that
permits us to go around Edison.  Likely attendees are CMTA, CLECA, the
Chamber, you (hopefully), PG&E and me.  Will Mike Kahl be at DJ's meeting?

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


ATTENTION
Virus Alert:
[Melissa.U Virus Variant]

Date: Oct. 18, 1999
Severity: A (Severe)
Effect of Attack:

This destructive variant of the Melissa.U virus attempts to delete several
critical system files rendering an infected computer unusable.  It also
attempts to automatically replicate to the first four available recipients in
the infected user's address book.  Most current anti-virus software products
DO NOT detect this variant at this time.

How To Prevent From Being Infected:
If you receive an email message with the subject line "pictures" and body
text "What's up?", then delete it immediately and notify the Help Desk

Always 'Disable Macros' if given a choice.

Please note our policy on email attachments:

Email

Malicious Code (Virus) Screening
In addition to the Enron requirement for email attachments (received and
sent) to be screened for malicious code (viruses, Trojan Horses, etc.), users
of Enron information resources are required to detach email attachments that
are received on to their hard drive for local virus screening purposes.

All executables (*.bat, *.exe, *.com) files should never be launched from
email without first consulting with IT.

Virus Alerts
The Internet is constantly being flooded with information about computer
viruses and Trojan Horses. However, within among real virus notices are
computer virus hoaxes. While these hoaxes do not infect systems, they are
still time consuming and costly to handle. It only wastes bandwidth and
un-necessarily alarms other computer users.

Please, do not perpetuate unconfirmed warnings about viruses and Trojan
Horses. If you receive an un-validated warning, don't pass it to all your
friends, pass it to your IT computer security manager to validate first.

Enron
Information Risk Management
713-853-5536


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001
09:42 AM ---------------------------
From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate@enronXgate on 03/15/2001 05:41 PM
Sent by: Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Karen
Buckley/ENRON@enronXgate, Chuck Ames/NA/Enron@Enron, Bilal
Bajwa/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Gim/NA/Enron@Enron, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Vladi
Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Schiavone/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matt
Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Virawan Yawapongsiri/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ted C Bland/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Dinner Invitation - April 10, 2001 (For Trading Track)

You are cordially invited to attend cocktails and dinner on April 10, 2001 at
La Colombe d'Or restaurant located at 3410 Montrose Blvd (a map can be found
at www.lacolombedor.com).  Cocktail hour will start at 7:00 pm with dinner to
follow.

Please note:  this dinner is for the Trading Track Program.

Please RSVP to Ted Bland at extension 3-5275 before April 6, 2001.


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/07/2000 06:33
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     12/07/2000 06:26 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ Nymex Natural Gas Futures Seen Opening 75C-80C Higher Traders
Calling 'Foul'

14:15 GMT 7 December 2000 *DJ Nymex Natural Gas Futures Seen Opening 75C-80C
Higher
(MORE) Dow Jones Newswires 07-12-00
1415GMT
Traders Calling 'Foul'
HOUSTON (Dow Jones)--The New York Mercantile Exchange natural gas futures
contracts are expected to open 75 cents to 80 cents higher again Thursday in
a march toward $10 per million British thermal units gas prices, traders
said.
ACCESS trading again pushed the numbers, with January gas trading in a wide
$8.61-$9.539/MMBtu range, with the last deal done at $9.95/MMBtu, $1.465
higher than Wednesday's already record $8.485/MMBtu settlement.
"This market resembles a clasic bull blow-off market," said Charlie Sanchez
of Gelber Associates in Houston.
Over-the-counter market was trading early Thursday at $9.28-$9.34/MMBtu,
with physical gas at the Henry Hub seen at $9.35-$9.43/MMBtu, traders said,
compared with Wednesday's closing range of $8.53-$9.30.
Traders see options at $9.00/MMBtu, with 8,200 positions and another 4,600
holding option calls at $10/MMBtu.
Swing swap physical trade has topped $10/MMBtu, a trader said.
"Trees don't grow to the sky," an East Coast trader said early Thursday.
"Not even manipulated ones."
"I've worked in gold markets and in potatoes," a trader said. "I know a
manipulated market when I see one."
Forecasters are predicting colder weather through December, a trader said,
but several traders have come down hard in complaints about the volatility
of a market jerked skyward in late night, low-volume ACCESS trading.
Support remains at $8.10 and $7.43, with resistance at $10 and $11.10,
traders said.
-By John Edmiston, Dow Jones Newswires, 713-547-9209;
john.edmiston@dowjones.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 07-12-00
1421GMT

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


actually a terrible game.  bonds didnt get a ball out of the infield in the air.  granted we werent exactly pitching strikes to him.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thomas, John Buckner
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:59 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE:

how was it?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	02 October 2001 11:49
To:	Thomas, John Buckner
Subject:	RE:

just bot them.  I'll save one for you.  just let me know asap.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thomas, John Buckner
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:46 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE:

yes and yes.  supposed to go to a dinner, but I might be able to flake. do you really have an extra ticket?  I should know in the next hour about dinner-

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John
Sent:	02 October 2001 11:42
To:	Thomas, John Buckner
Subject:

hey buddy:
heard you're in town.  any interest in going to the bb game tonight? have some right field homerun catching seats


Please email me with requests for central deals.  Thanks.
PL


Dear Tim,

Thanks for the info.  We have followed up on all points noted in the first
review and have found a couple more.  We will want to discuss these on Monday.

I should be able to send you the Doorstep reports for St. Louis and Chicago
(updated) once David and Bjorn get a chance to review them.

Best regards

Shona

Tim Poullain-Patterson@ECT
11/03/2000 03:22 AM
To: Marcelo Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Naomi Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Shona
Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Chicago Doorstep Review

Thanks for the update - as you say, hopefully this summary covers all the
issues. Shona?

Point #2 comes up in Doorstep after Doorstep. It was discussed extensively
upon being raised in the Singapore Doorstep and Andy Cowx (Telecoms expert
for Enron Europe) researched potential solutions without success. I can't
help but feel that as this is a global issue, a global solution/answer needs
to be found. Shona - can you take this up with either Sally or Ted and find
someone accountable for coming up with a global answer.

Point #4 per the updated list of Authorised Traders and follow up note to Sam
Hainsworth defining scope of what Chicago and Montreal may/may not do, any
residual position that Chicago may "create" is pre-authorised by Sam and is
an integral part of his global book. I have forwarded the follow up note to
Shona this morning, and confirmed with Sam that he has communicated the
contents with his staff in those offices, i.e. no local limits, however
small, are required!

Point #5 Lou's list of AS400 development needs has been prioritised and
depending on where on this list the improvements to customer reports are,
this should be done in the very near future.

Point #10 we considered preserving the Helsinki typewriter in perspex, as a
reminder to us all, however I am assured it has now been destroyed. Suggest
that once the forms have been converted, this machine is rendered useless,
e.g. remove the "e" key or take a spanner to it!

Per the point you make about the timing of moving the scrap business - I will
assume that the timing is acceptable to Houston unless we hear concerns to
the contrary.

Thanks and regards,
Tim

Marcelo Parra@MGUSA
02/11/2000 22:46
To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Naomi
Connell/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Chicago Doorstep Review

Please find Derek's report on the visit by the Houston Risk/Controlling
team.  Assuming that this summary covered all the issues, it seems that we
are making progress.

Point # 1 - The problem with the phones will be addressed when they move to
the other Enron office.  I agree that the sooner the move takes place the
better but let's make sure that they are properly set up in the new office
prior to their move.  The critical part of the move is to assure that
availability to the AS400 is established, prior to the move.
Point #2 - Using cell phones needs to be addressed.  How are you controlling
this in London and other offices?
Once we transfer the Scrap business to London (Jan. 2000) we will not have
position issues in Chicago.  Until that time comes please note that Chicago
has been instructed not to take any positions.  In the event of an unbalanced
book, with an agreement from Sam, they will need a small limit..  Tim, Can
you formalize this with Sam (see point 4 below) for good order sake?
Point # 5 - We need a better customer exposure report from the AS400.  Mike
Sweeny should  help us on this front.
Point # 10 - "Russia/Bills of Lading/Typewriter"  - Helsinki is still fresh
in our minds.  What can I say.  I told them to unplug the machine.
Point # 11- Stephanie reporting to Lou is not a problem.  Derek doing
logistics and assisting the traders is not a problem since we have taken away
all the middle office functions from his control.

Please let me know if you hear anything different.

Best regards,
Marcelo
Enron Metals & Commodity Corp.
E-Mail: Marcelo.Parra@enron.com

----- Forwarded by Marcelo Parra/NYC/MGUSA on 11/02/00 01:20 PM -----

	Derek Van Deusen
	11/02/00 12:29 PM

		 To: Louis Colarusso/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Marcelo Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA
		 cc: Bob Uxa/CHI/MGUSA@MGUSA, David Rosenblum/CHI/MGUSA@MGUSA
		 Subject: Chicago Doorstep Review

Following is a recap of issues Bob & I discussed yesterday with
Shona Wilson, David Port & Bjorn Hagelmann:

1- We explained how all confirms/pricings/invoices were now sent
directly to counterparties from NY, not Chicago.

2- David Port was very concerned that we were not using taped phones yet
and will push this issue upon return to Houston as reason for us to move
to ENA before Thanksgiving, perhaps as early as next weekend.

3- Discussed problems with confirming business when out of the office (on home
phones, cell phones or external meetings):
a)  Conversations not taped -- suggested that a conference call be made to
a taped line at our office to record the transaction, or that someone from the
office call the counterparty directly to confirm the contract.
b)  They were concerned about fixing prices without a screen.  We explained
that
mostly we only fix premiums/discounts for later pricing.  When fixing a
price, the
trader would either call the office or LME broker for a live quote and for
hedging.

4- We explained that we do not have formal position limits because our book
is more or less fully hedged (as per JR's memo).  David asked if we had any
'informal' limits, to which we suggested +/- 500 MT due to buying & selling
through
the course of the day, but unhedged positions, if any, would not be left open
unless discussed with & approved by Sam.

5- We agreed that credit functions & reporting should be strengthened,
especially
to show total exposures by customers, not just limits or receivables.

6- Shona will follow up with Alan Aronowitz to finalize GTCs/Master
Agreements ASAP.

7- Shona asked about progress with agency agreements.  Lou - please add this
to
your action plan with Naomi Connell in London as responsible party.

8- Showed them our daily positions & AS400 positions which they agreed were in
good order.  Explained that NY reconciles positions daily and Chicago balances
AS400 vs. daily position periodically as needed.

9- They asked how we track overshipments and undershipments.  Showed them how
traffic dept. uses Access system to highlight late/over/undershipments which
are
brought to trader for action.  Showed comparable reports in AS400 showing
late shipments
and undershipments, but explained that overshipments were automatically
zeroed out by AS400.
I will discuss this further with Sweeney to formalize reporting of
overshipments for
tracking of position changes & contract overages.

10- Bjorn was very concerned that we use a typewriter to fill out certain
forms -- most
notably Enron's 5-part carbon-paper insurance certs.  (Apparently Helskinki
problem
involved using a typewriter to alter Bills of Lading.)  Bjorn will discuss
with Enron insurance
dept. possibility of converting to electronic forms.

11- They suggested that Stephanie should report directly to Lou instead of
DVD in order to
maintain front/middle office separation.  Also that DVD should be either
trading or logistics/
administration, not a combination of both (Helsinki again).

12- Showed them daily P&L and trader sign-off procedure.

DVD

Derek Van Deusen
Enron Metals & Commodity Corp.
200 West Madison Street, Suite 2420
Chicago, IL  60606-3416
Tel: 312-407-6060
Fax: 312-407-6069
E-Mail: derek.van.deusen@enron.com


I think if once you get full access  you could have your assistant plug in
the required data for on each ISDA Master in place or draft you have out to
counterparties.  When you come here I would like to spend just a little time
going over some of the data and the reporting funtions.  I am going to open
an Enron counterparty called short name "Enron Australia" and that should be
the code name you should use.  Please do not change the entries on any of the
Houston or London based counterparties.

	David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	08/17/2000 06:31 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alison
Keogh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
McGrory/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: Financial Trading Legal Database

   I fully endorse Mark's suggestion to load up our ISDAs. A worldwide data
dase of this nature is a valuable resource.  I have access to the data base
and refer it. Getting our contracts on is on my to do list. What is the best
way forward.   Yes I will be over in October, I fact I will staying a month.
However, if there is anything we can do to get info loaded up sooner? We are
most willing to put in the resources.

When access is being granted could it also be given to my Admin assistant
Alison Keogh and also Rob McGrory who is also working under my direction on
ISDA documentation.

Thanks for taking the initative on this matter.

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 17-08-2000 09:43 CDT
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Financial Trading Legal Database

David,

Mark Taylor asked me to talk to you about getting your ISDA Masters inputted
into our Financial Trading Database.  This databse is the central master
database where we keep records of the financial agreements in either draft
form or that have been executed.  London currently updates this database to
manage  its (and Singapore's) financial contracts and I would like to get the
Australian agreements plugged into the system.

This database serves a number of purposes.  First, it is our core memory of
contract negotiations.  Anyone in Legal and Credit around the world can take
a look at this database and determine who we have entered into contract with
and what negotiation issues may be at issue.  It is critical as we become a
global trading company that we are consistent in the legal positions we take
on these financial contracts.  For instance, it would be quite problematic if
someone in Houston was negotiating a contract with an ISDA counterparty and
asserted that a certain position was critical, if we find out a lawyer in
another office was negotiating with the same counterparty and gave on the
same position the day before.  We need to make a somewhat coordinated effort
on the counterparty front.

In addition, with so many masters and so many counterparties there is just no
way to keep track of what we have said or done unless we have a database.

Further, we use the information in the database to respond to inside
auditing, reporting and insurance inquiries.

For online trading, I check the database to see if we have a financial master
agreement and what trading restrictions we may or may not have in place.
Global contracts uses this database to confirm their financial contract
records and approval for online trading.

For both Houston and London we use the database to communicate with our
Clients, whether traders or  back office support people.  Employees outside
legal have  limited view access only to see all the information except the
confidential Legal and Credit comments.  They have no edit capabilities.  The
database also has some reporting functions that we and London Legal have
found helpful.

You should have gotten my email to Mike Neves, out database coordinator
requesting full edit access for you.  It usually takes a few days.  Once you
get access maybe you could find some time to surf the database, and we can
figure out how to get your ISDA data inputted..

Are you coming to the ENA Legal Conference in October?  That would be a good
time for me to do a full review of this database with you.


Jacque' call me after you get this.


Re: Note I left on your desk. Could you take a look at this deal when you get
a chance?

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 01/09/2001 04:53 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Kimberly Allen                           01/09/2001 01:48 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #485446

Kate,
I received and index trade into NP15 that Chris Mallory did. For Price the
confirmations states:

The average day ahead, post congestion price for the Constrained Price as
published by the California Power Exchange for the on in the period of
delivery stated herein plus 3.00.

Is this language o.k. to accept on the confirmation.

Thanks,

Kimberly Indelicato
33031


Good.  I'm ready to get at least one thing off the "to do" list.

Kay

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           12/13/2000 08:07 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Letter agreement

Stamp of approval.  Mike J. Miller is the right guy from ENA to sign.  Please
let me know if you have any trouble getting a signature from any of the
parties.

Thanks,

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
08:06 AM ---------------------------

DeKrey Lynn <Lynn.DeKrey@swpc.siemens.com> on 12/12/2000 04:58:08 PM
To: "Mitch Robinson (E-mail)" <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com>
cc: Monahan Bill <Bill.Monahan@swpc.siemens.com>

Subject: FW: Letter agreement

Mitch
This is acceptable, please submit

Lynn DeKrey

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 5:05 PM
To: lynn.dekrey@swpc.siemens.com
Subject: Letter agreement

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/10/2000 04:08
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/10/2000 04:03 PM

To:   Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, lynn@dekrey@swpc.siemens.com, Ross
      Newlin/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject:  Letter agreement

Gentlemen,

I've revised paragraph 5 to reflect our discussion.  Also, I made a change
to paragraph 7 to include technical bulletins per Mitch's request which we
did not discuss on our call.

(See attached file: WestinghouseProposal to Resolve Issues on Enron - Dec10
SWPC.doc)

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Kay

713 345 7566

 - WestinghouseProposal to Resolve Issues on Enron - Dec10 SWPC.doc


Attached is a revised draft of the Price Posting Agreement for your review.
Because text has been rearranged and several provisions have been
substantially reworded, the version of this agreement marked against the
prior version is not particularly helpful, but I am happy to provide one if
you wish.

Please note that I am the only one on the Enron working group that has seen
this revised draft; it therefore remains subject to comments by the other
members of the team.

Instead of providing a redline, I thought it would be helpful to review the
most substantive changes in this e-mail.  Please feel free to give me a call
with any comments or questions.

1. As I have discussed with Stephen, you should not assume that we have
rejected any of your comments if they did not appear in the attached
version.   Please contact me to discuss, or resend, any comments that you
believe that we accepted but that are not reflected in this document.

2. Several new defined terms have been added.  Several definitions were
revised to reflect that eSpeed will be posting prices to a platform operated
by a separate legal entity that eSpeed will not necessarily control.

3. The defined terms "Sponsor Material Adverse Effect", "Sponsor Regulatory
Event", and "Sponsor Technological Failure" have been renamed "eSpeed ..."
instead of "Sponsor ..."

4. Sections 3(a) and (b) have been slightly reworded to reflect the multiple
platform concept.   Section 3(c) was moved from Section 5.  The standards for
a party's right to suspend have been revised slightly.  Also, Section 4(d)
includes a right by Enron to suspend prices specifically in the event of
mapping errors; this provision also relates to the termination right in
Section 13 with respect to mapping errors.

5. Section 4 has been rewritten to reflect the multiple platforms.

6. Section 5(b) has been revised to reflect that the parties should develop a
set of ground rules for operating and maintaining the Interfaces that will
govern the parties once they commence operations.

7. Section 6 has not been changed in any significant manner, except for
Section 6(d) with respect to commissions

8. Section 7 has been moved (it was previously Section 9) and reflects our
concerns that the means by which contracts are entered into with Enron are
clearly disclosed to Participants.

9. The parity section has been revised as we discussed -- essentially, Enron
shall use "commercially reasonable efforts to ensure parity"

10. The reps and warranties and covenants have not been substantively
revised, but separate reps, warranties and covenants are made by each party
(instead of including both parties reps/warranties/covenants in the same
provision).

11. Section 12 is new.  We felt that the Agreement did not clearly set forth
what would have to be done before the parties could start posting prices.

12. We have revised Section 13(a)(i) and (iii) and 13(b)(i) and (iii)
(termination events as we discussed); 13(a)(ii) and (b)(ii) are new.

13. Section 14 has been substantially revised, but is still confusing,
However, the idea is that the agreement include a single provision governing
confidentiality and that certain information that Enron is particularly
sensitive about will be kept confidential, while other information becomes
eSpeed's property at some point to do with as it wishes.  Any thoughts about
clarifying Section 14 would be appreciated.

14. The Indemnity has been revised to include a separate section for each
party ((a) and (b)), but we do not believe that the substance of the prior
provision was changed.

15. We need to give further thought to Section 16 and the provisions that
eSpeed provided to us (Sections 15(e), (f) and (g) in the prior draft).
While I have discussed this with Stephen and do not object to the point that
those provisions is trying to make, the language is a bit broad in places and
we need to spend more time with it to make sure that it does not conflict
with other provisions of the Agreement.

16. I have tried to reserve the right for the parties to obtain injunctive
relief, but this section needs expansion -- and I think Stephen had some
specific thoughts about what would not be subject to arbitration.

17. The Enron Covenant added as Exhibit H is not perfect, but it is
essentially what we had contemplated providing.  The Schedule A listing
Specified Products is also attached.  Therefore, the only Exhibit or Schedule
missing is Exhibit I, which is the commission structure.

Please feel free to call or send a message if you have any comments or
questions regarding the atttached.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Vince,

The Associate & Analyst Programs are conducting Focus Group Sessions to
gather feedback regarding the Mid-Year 2000 PRC Process.  You have been
randomly identified as a participant in the Supervisors session.
Organizational Development Consultants from Corporate Human Resources will
facilitate the sessions.  We encourage your participation and welcome your
feedback as we prepare for the year-end performance assessment process.  The
logistics are as follows:

Friday, September 8, 2000
11:00am - 12:30pm
Location - EB32C2

Please RSVP to Constance Charles at 3-5614 or by email no later than
Wednesday, September 6th at 12:00 noon.  Lunch will be provided.

I look forward to receiving your feedback.

Thank you,
Charlene Jackson


What do you know about Panda Resources?  Nothing in a rush right now but I am showing them 10 year prices for their plant in AZ.  I would, however, like to be prepared to do bidness!  Let me know what you need.

Thanks,

Ki.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:28 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE:

Hilarious.  I saw you too.  Who was that hunky guy you were with???

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:01 AM
To:	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:

Saw you at the baseball game last night.  Credit being all work and no play is just not true!


With this attitude, you are sure to work up in the standings of being our
favorite Credit person...


Dear Windows User,
Now you can boost the reliability of ordinary Windows 95, 98 and ME to nearly the level of Windows NT or 2000, Microsoft's professional and industrial version of Windows.
The new WinFix is a very effective way to improve the reliability of Windows, because it makes Windows fault-tolerant and self-repairing.
And WinFix is very safe, because it operates completely independent of Windows.CLICK HERE  to find out more about WinFix, the safest, most effective way to keep you working, by keeping your PC working non-stop.
Arlen Dixon, CEO
Pinewood Software Marketing
-------------------------------------------------------
This announcement is intended for PC users who asked to be kept
informed about new developments in Windows technology.
We apologize for any email you may have inadvertently received.
Please CLICK HERE  to be removed from future mailings.


Brad
Attached is the final version for signature.
Roger


James:
I talked with Thomas Favinger and Tom Boren is the CEO of PG&E, which is not
the best guy to send the books to.  The better person is Thomas Favinger and
his address is:

Thomas Favinger
PG&E National Energy Group
7500 Old Georgetown Road
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Phone: (301) 280-6231
Fax: (301) 280-6911

National Energy Group is the sub of PG&E.
So please send out 2 books to Thomas tonight.  Thanks!
Ben


F.Y.I.

  PG&E Presses to End Freeze That Keeps
  Power Costs Low in Northern California
  By Rebecca Smith

  09/15/2000
  The Wall Street Journal
  Page A3
  (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

  California's largest utility is pushing to end a four-year-old retail rate
freeze that has
  insulated millions of Northern Californians from the volatile wholesale
electricity prices that
  have rocked San Diego this summer.

  PG&E Corp., parent of Pacific Gas & Electric Co. in San Francisco, said it
wants to end
  the freeze imposed in 1996 by the state legislature as soon as possible,
because it is
  losing money under the arrangement. In a filing with the Securities and
Exchange
  Commission, PG&E said it has collected $2.2 billion less from customers
this summer
  than it has shelled out to buy bulk power for them from the
state-sanctioned California
  Power Exchange, a central auction.

  PG&E's disclosure sets the stage for a major confrontation between the
utility and
  regulators. It will be up to the California Public Utilities Commission to
balance conflicting
  needs: the utility's desire to protect its shareholders from potentially
huge losses, and the
  commission's own duty, as regulator, to protect the public from a flawed
market that
  appears incapable of delivering the "just and reasonable" rates required by
law. Legislators
  now say they fear the state could be tipped into a recession if electricity
prices don't drop
  soon.

  Under the state's 1996 deregulation law, all California investor-owned
utilities were allowed
  to freeze rates at what seemed like high levels. Utilities were permitted
to use surplus
  revenues to pay down generation-related debts that regulators said would
render them
  uncompetitive in a deregulated world. It worked well until this summer.
PG&E charged
  customers, on average, $54 for each megawatt hour of electricity supplied
even though it
  paid only $26 and $31 a megawatt hour, respectively, for that power in 1998
and 1999. By
  June 30, it had collected enough surplus money to cancel $6.2 billion of
debts.

  But the situation went haywire this summer as wholesale power prices
lurched upward. The
  utility paid an average price of $163 a megawatt hour for electricity in
June, $110 in July and
  $187 in August. Prices may be higher yet this month. The average price of
power to be
  consumed today, for example, is $200 a megawatt hour, or nearly four times
the amount
  that PG&E can bill its customers.

  Until recently, it was assumed that the utility would be able to recapture,
in times of weaker
  demand, any shortfall that occurred in high-priced summer months. But that
is looking less
  and less certain. Power prices projected for coming months look higher than
the $54 a
  megawatt hour that PG&E now charges, particularly with natural-gas prices
roughly triple
  the price of two to three years ago. The latter pushes up generating costs
at natural
  gas-fired plants. Another problem is that there is less power available to
be imported from
  outside California. In fact, the Pacific Northwest is expected to run short
of power this
  winter, with less water available than in recent years for hydroelectric
generation, putting
  pressure on California's market right when plants normally are taken out of
service for
  maintenance.

  PG&E's chief financial officer now says he sees no reason to prolong the
pain. He wants
  the freeze ended or he wants protection from high wholesale prices. "People
did not
  envision the situation we have today," says Peter Darbee. Yesterday,
Moody's Investors
  Service Inc. issued a negative outlook on PG&E, Edison International and
their big utilities,
  citing the "increased supply risk" assumed by the utilities and "the
unsettled state of
  electric deregulation in California."

  But state officials are loath to let consumers feel today's market
volatility. Knowing that,
  PG&E may seek to strike a bargain in which it would continue some sort of
rate freeze in
  exchange for permission to recoup some of the money it has lost. But there
is no provision
  for that under current state law. The law simply says that when the
utilities have paid down
  certain categories of costs, the freeze ends. If they haven't paid down
these debts by March
  31, 2002, it ends anyway, and they have to swallow any loss.

  The wild card is what will happen with PG&E's 4,000-megawatt hydroelectric
network, the
  biggest such system in North America. The utility has offered to shave $2.8
billion from the
  tally of debts billed to ratepayers, if it is allowed to move its
powerhouses and dams into
  the hands of an unregulated affilate. Such a move would end the rate freeze
since the
  proceeds would be more than enough to offset the amount PG&E says it is
otherwise
  entitled to collect from ratepayers, some $1.6 billion.

  But so long as power prices are volatile, nobody really wants the freeze to
end but PG&E.

  In its SEC filing, the company said that it has no reason to believe, at
the current time, that
  it will be able to recover lost monies and said it may be "required to
write off the
  unrecoverable portion as a one-time charge against earnings" -- potentially
amounting to
  billions of dollars. The same scenario exists for Edison International's
Southern California
  Edison Co. unit, which serves most of the lower third of the state and has
run a deficit of
  roughly $1 billion this summer.

  Observers say both utilities are wary of inciting consumer anger, should
they be too
  aggressive in lobbying for an end to the freeze. A case in point: In
hearings before federal
  energy regulators on Tuesday, Steve Baum, chairman of Sempra Energy, owner
of San
  Diego 's utility, said the company's utility trucks are being defaced and
workers are being
  intimidated by customers who are furious about power bills that have
doubled and tripled
  since June. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. is the only utility, thus far, to
end its rate freeze
  and pass wholesale power costs directly through to customers.

  State Sen. Debra Bowen, chairwoman of the California Senate utilities
committee, said the
  legislature is reluctant to become involved. She said the legislature
"feels like somebody
  who's fallen into poison oak enough times that all we have to do is walk
past a bush and we
  break out in a rash. That's the way we react to these energy issues now."

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  Business/Financial Desk; Section C
  A Dwindling Faith In Deregulation
  New Ways to Harness Electricity
  By NEELA BANERJEE

  09/15/2000
  The New York Times
  Page 1, Column 2
  c. 2000 New York Times Company

  Over a few sultry days in the summer of 1997, the state of Wisconsin got an
early taste of
  the electricity shortages that now threaten several other regions of the
country. An
  unusually large number of nuclear plants that supply the northern Midwest
were closed for
  maintenance just as an unexpected heat wave drifted into the area.
Wisconsin Electric,
  which serves Milwaukee, shut off electricity to 80 businesses; every few
hours, it
  beseeched consumers to limit their energy use.

  Wisconsin Electric averted blackouts, but the scare profoundly changed the
state's
  approach to deregulating the power industry, a process it had begun to
explore only a year
  earlier. Like many other utilities, Wisconsin Electric initially pushed for
what it and others
  called the Big Bang: state regulators giving up control over the production
and pricing of
  electricity almost immediately.

  But after the 1997 power shortage, Wisconsin Electric, along with most
local businesses
  and consumer advocacy groups, began to support a go-slow approach to
deregulation, first
  building in an extra margin of reliable power before encouraging the state
to remove its
  decades-old grip on the electricity industry.

  Lately, the rest of the country has been drawing the same conclusion. Just
like Wisconsin,
  several other states have lost their early faith in the instantaneous,
smooth creation of a
  free and fair electricity market. Deregulation has faltered as surging
consumer demand
  outstrips the supply of electricity, and regulators and utilities scramble
to cope with
  successive summers of price volatility and power failures.

  More than a year ago, the wholesale price of electricity charged by power
plants in the
  Midwest surged to $6,000 a megawatt-hour, compared with average costs of
$21 to $22 for
  the same amount of power. Con Ed customers in New York paid 43 percent more
for
  electricity this June than last year. Prices have spiked elsewhere as well.

  And when rolling blackouts rippled through Silicon Valley and electricity
bills doubled in
  San Diego over several weeks this summer, California's pioneering approach
to
  deregulation came to embody what many see as the failings of the process.

  Despite the second thoughts about deregulation, few experts expect a return
to the days of
  strict government control. A world in which various power generators
compete openly to
  provide electricity at market prices still offers the prospect of both
lower costs for business
  and consumers and higher profits for utilities than is possible under the
traditional, more
  inefficient system in which monopoly suppliers are supervised by government
regulators.

  ''California is an indication to the rest of us that we need to do our
homework to make
  deregulation work,'' said Dick Olson, legal counsel with the Wisconsin
Industrial Energy
  Group, an association of large companies. ''Some people want to stop the
process, but the
  genie is out of the bottle.''

  But getting from here to there is proving far more difficult than expected.
Lacking a clear
  federal approach, states are finding their own way and, in the process,
casting doubt on
  some early promises.

  ''Deregulation was definitely oversold to consumers by many people,'' said
Severin
  Borenstein, director of the Energy Institute at the University of
California at Berkeley. ''To
  economists and a few others, deregulation was a calculated experiment, and
we knew it
  would have its costs.''

  Historically, a regional electric utility, which was owned by investors and
regulated by the
  state, generated power, transmitted it over high-voltage lines and then
distributed it in
  low-voltage form into homes and businesses. In broad terms, deregulation
calls for
  separating generation, transmission and distribution into distinct
businesses.

  Deregulation advocates argued that if power plants were sold to private
owners, they would
  compete among themselves to sell power to transmission and distribution
companies at
  cheaper prices, driving down the cost of electricity. But that outcome was
predicated on the
  realities of the mid-1990's, when power plants had spare capacity.

  But with few power plants coming on line recently, particularly in
California and the
  Northeast, deregulation was introduced in the late 1990's at the worst
possible time. In the
  thriving economy, businesses demanded more electricity, and people built
bigger homes
  and bought more gadgets, sharply narrowing the gap between available
supplies of
  electricity and peak demand. Fuel for generation has also become more
expensive,
  especially natural gas, whose price has doubled even as it has grown
increasingly popular
  because it is cleaner than other fuels.

  ''I think that the expectation that deregulation will always give you lower
prices is
  unrealistic,'' said John B. Ramil, president of the Tampa Electric Company,
a unit of TECO
  Energy Inc. ''Consumers think that competition will lead to lower prices
automatically, when
  actually they will be paying market prices for power.''

  Advocates rallied support for electricity deregulation by asserting that it
would deliver the
  choice and the low prices that deregulation of telecommunications has
brought. But they
  forgot that the restructuring of the telephone industry, like power
deregulation now, angered
  consumers early on, when local calling rates rose and the proliferation of
choices baffled
  many people. Lawmakers and regulators took years to iron out the process,
which is still
  going on. And because electricity is even more vital than telephones, there
is far less
  tolerance for interruptions in service and volatile prices.

  ''You can't assume that you can deregulate in one year and sit back and
watch how things
  work,'' said Barry Abramson, senior utility analyst with PaineWebber.
''Regulators and utility
  officials have to come back frequently and correct problems they never
expected until the
  system gets it right.''

  Seeing an Example In Pennsylvania

  So far, 24 states have tried some form of deregulation, but regulators and
utilities in other
  regions say changes in their local electricity industry are inevitable, too.

  Among states where deregulation has occurred, Pennsylvania has emerged so
far as the
  place where the promises of competition and lower prices are being met most
successfully.
  The state began to draw up a deregulation blueprint in 1996, around the
same time
  California did, driven by electric rates in Philadelphia and other major
cities double the
  average in the United States.

  But Pennsylvania opted for a plan that calls for substantial government
involvement in the
  market at every step. The state protected the utilities against losses from
their older plants;
  in return utilities had to agree to freeze rates until 2006 at 1997 levels
to protect
  consumers.

  The state aggressively advertised a choice of new electricity providers.
More important, it
  set the benchmark generation rates for traditional utilities at a fairly
high level, which made
  some outside competitors' prices look favorable in comparison and which
spurred
  consumers to choose new power providers.

  As a result, more than 528,000 residential and business users, about 10
percent of the
  total, have switched to other providers that sell them power at a fixed
price over long
  periods. A recent study by the State of Pennsylvania estimated that
consumers have saved
  about $2.84 billion in energy costs over the last three years.

  As consumers sought new power providers, those same companies began to
build new
  plants in and near Pennsylvania, shoring up electricity reliability in the
area. About 19,000
  megawatts of power, adding 50 percent more capacity, are expected to come
on line in
  Pennsylvania in the next five years.

  Pennsylvania also cobbled together the independent system operator PJM from
a network
  of neighboring states that could transmit power easily to one another,
creating a grid third in
  size behind the entire transmission systems of France and of Japan.

  Trying Rate Caps In California

  Yet the lurching progress of deregulation in the country as a whole and the
loss of old
  certainties like reliable power at steady prices have ignited a popular
backlash in many
  areas, most vividly in California. There, the state has decided to cap
rates in San Diego at
  1999 levels for the next two years. Other Californians have urged a
rollback of deregulation,
  demanding that power plants sold to private owners be placed under
government control
  again.

  The widespread short supply of electricity and the peculiarities of the
commodity itself have
  given generation companies enormous leverage in the marketplace. Unlike
most other
  goods, electricity cannot be stored to be used when there is a shortage.
Nor is it something
  consumers can do without, which means the companies that supply people with
electricity
  will pay just about any price to keep the lights on.

  Most analysts say that the exercise of such influence is not illegal --nor
unexpected --
  since companies can be expected to try to maximize their profits. But
California's complex
  power buying mechanism has created a situation in which relatively small
players have
  extraordinary influence.

  On June 14, for example, the temperature in San Francisco hit 103 degrees
and heat
  records were broken all over the Bay Area. The state's Independent System
Operator,
  which coordinates transmission of electricity, predicted that during peak
use on that
  weekday afternoon, California would need 43,000 megawatts. But reports from
the power
  plants working that day showed only 36,000 megawatts available. As a
result, the California
  I.S.O. paid $1,500 a megawatt to various plants that were not running; some
of those plants
  had bet on a shortage and delayed generation until the price of power
reached the cap.

  ''The world knows we'll make up that energy shortfall somewhere,'' said
Spence Gerber,
  director of settlements at the I.S.O. ''People go in and make their bids
knowing we're not
  going to shut the lights off. We have no choice.''

  In California, rate freezes have prevented most utilities from passing on
much of the higher
  price of power to consumers. In San Diego , however, the rate freezes were
lifted just as
  the city strained under a heat wave. That led to the doubling of customers'
bills in the span
  of a month.

  One part of any long-term solution, experts say, is to increase the supply
of electricity,
  through building new power plants and transmission lines. But few
communities want power
  plants or transmission towers on their turf, adding to delays.

  So far, states have relied on caps on the wholesale price of power to keep
costs down. In
  California, the price cap, until recently, was $750 a megawatt, and in
Pennsylvania, it is
  $1,000. But California officials concede that power plants sometimes get
$1,500 a
  megawatt-hour -- $750 for being on standby and $750 for the power itself.

  Caps, if set too low, may dissuade companies from producing electricity and
from building
  new power plants. ''If you fix caps at $250, you have to realize that if in
a neighboring state
  someone is offering $251 for power, you will have a serious shortage,''
said Richard Priory,
  chairman of Duke Energy, a nationwide power generation and trading company.

  Given the complexities, deregulation, with its connotation of a
laissez-faire management of
  an industry, seems a misnomer. The focus is now on reorganizing the
electricity industry,
  rather than cutting it loose, and of using sophisticated forms of
regulation to foster
  competition and efficiency.

  ''What we're looking at is re-regulation, regulation in a different manner
than we had before,''
  said Douglas Hale, senior economist with the Energy Information
Administration in
  Washington. ''Electricity is not one of those commodities that you can walk
away from and
  let take care of itself. You need a central authority to make sure it
doesn't all come
  crashing down.''

  In Wisconsin, rather than having the legislature adopt an overall plan, the
central state
  authority has moved to revamp the transmission sector before tackling
generation, the
  reverse of what most other states have done. The Midwest price spikes in
1998 revealed
  that while neighboring states were willing to provide power, there were not
enough
  transmission lines in Wisconsin to bring it in. As a result, the Wisconsin
government has
  compelled the state's four major utilities to surrender operation of their
transmission lines to
  the Midwest Independent System Operator, which covers several states, to
make sure all
  companies have equal access to power lines.

  ''The problem with the big bang in an industry like ours is that you take a
large risk,'' said
  Larry Salustro, senior vice president of Wisconsin Electric. ''Maybe in
three years, the
  market will be better. But in those three years, people will go through
difficult personal and
  financial times.''

  The transmission company will be responsible for building new lines to
improve the
  importing of power, and though they own shares in the concern, no single
utility controls it.
  Wisconsin plans to double transmission capacity in the next four or five
years, by which
  time the state would be ready to deregulate generation.

  ''You won't have low prices unless you create an effective market
structure,'' said Lee
  Cullen, counsel for Customers First, a Wisconsin consumer advocacy group.
''Everybody
  can support competition as a superior system, but we're not rushing
headlong into it.''

  Building safeguards against the volatility deregulation brings will clearly
take years, as more
  generation -- mostly in small natural-gas-fired power plants -- starts up,
as more power lines
  are built to move electricity to where it is needed most and as business
and consumers
  respond to higher prices by finding ways to conserve power and limit use
during peak
  periods.

  Some businesses and the occasional residential customer have set up links
with their
  utilities to respond to electricity prices in real time, by turning down
lights or allowing air-
  conditioning to shut down briefly when a computer message informs them of
price spikes.
  So far, however, such operations are rare.

  ''Until consumers can see and respond to real-time prices, price caps will
remain a
  necessary evil,'' Mr. Borenstein said. ''The dirty secret of restructuring
is that it is replacing
  old forms of regulation with new ones.''

  Photos: Lee Cullen is a lawyer for Customers First, a Wisconsin consumer
advocacy
  group. He stands outside the switching station and coal yard of Madison Gas
and Electric
  in Madison, Wis. (Andy Manis for The New York Times)(pg. C4); Individual
states are trying
  to find answers to the problem of deregulating the electricity industry.
Power lines in
  Wisconsin, left, are symbols of a state that is trying to revamp the
transmission sector. In
  Pennsylvania, where a power plant is being built in Lebanon, below, the
government is
  involved with the market at every step. (John Zeedick for The New York
Times); (John Saller
  for The New York Times)(pg. C1) Chart/Graph: ''Shocks to The System'' In
deregulated
  electricity markets, prices have been far more volatile than expected, at
times jumping to
  extraordinary levels during shortages. *Volume-weighted wholesale spot
prices for on-peak,
  next-day delivery of a megawatt-hour of electricity. (Source: Bloomberg
Financial Markets;
  Cambridge Energy Research Associates)(pg. C1) ''Approaching Electricity
Deregulation
  More Cautiously'' As some states struggle with tight supplies and high
prices, others are
  moving more slowly on deregulation. Graph tracks supply and demand since
1980. Map
  tracks Deregulation by state. (Sources: Edison Electric Institute; North
American Electric
  Reliability Council; Energy Information Administration)(pg. C4)

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  Metro; Letters Desk
  Bidding Rules Costly for Electric Rates

  09/15/2000
  Los Angeles Times
  Home Edition
  Page B-8
  Copyright 2000 / The Times Mirror Company

  * Re "Davis Walks a Political Tightrope on Energy Prices," Sept. 12: The
deregulation of the California utilities
  didn't include a change in the strangling bidding rules to which these
utilities, unfortunately, are bound. They are
  required to buy their power through a state-sponsored day-ahead market,
rather than being allowed to bid on
  longer-range contracts on the free market, which would permit them to lock
in lower pricing.

  The California Legislature wanted to retain controls on pricing, thinking
it would result in the lowest costs. Well,
  the legislators were wrong! The real damage is that the public now believes
energy price increases were due to
  deregulation, but in fact the utilities still aren't deregulated enough to
permit freedom of bidding. Take the reins off
  the bidding prices, and prices will come down.

  JAN WINNING

  West Hills

  *

  Why do the state taxpayers have to pay to keep San Diego residents'
electric bills down to $68 a month? Either
  the power providers are ripping the people off, or they have had really
cheap electricity because San Diego Gas &
  Electric didn't invest enough in increasing power-generating capacity.

  They could shut off the air conditioning and probably keep their bill that
low. My parents never had any air
  conditioning, and they lived where it got over 100 degrees every year. In a
lot of cases we would be better off
  without it, just not as comfortable. There is no constitutional right or
guarantee that we have to have air
  conditioning or cheap electricity. It sounds like a good time to start
conserving.

  KEN WALTERS

  Apple Valley

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Louise, I can certainly put this together for you but I'm not sure it will be of much use - Canada has always been considered as "restricted cash" since the ENA cannot sweep without cross-border tax implications. As a result, Houston in the past has not required any cash flow numbers. Please advise, thanks, rob.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:06 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; Arora, Harry; Baughman, Edward D.; Belden, Tim; Black, Don; Breslau, Craig; Calger, Christopher F.; Collonges, Remi; Colwell, Wes; Davies, Derek; Davis, Mark Dana; Dayao, Anthony; Deffner, Joseph; Devries, Paul; Duran, W. David; Dutt, Ranabir; Forster, David; Foster, Chris H.; Gonzalez, Orlando; Grigsby, Mike; Haedicke, Mark E.; Herndon, Rogers; Josey, Scott; Keel, Allan; Kishkill, Joe; Kitagawa, Kyle; Kitchen, Louise; Lagrasta, Fred; Luce, Laura; Martin, Thomas A.; Mcdonald, Michael; McMichael Jr., Ed; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Milnthorp, Rob; Mrha, Jean; Neal, Scott; Parquet, David; Presto, Kevin M.; Redmond, Brian; Shively, Hunter S.; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Swerzbin, Mike; Thomas, Jake; Thompson, John; Tricoli, Carl; Tycholiz, Barry; Vickers, Frank W.; Whitt, Mark; Wiggs, Brett; Wolfe, Greg; Zipper, Andy; Zufferli, John
Cc:	Deffner, Joseph; Lavorato, John
Subject:	End of quarter Funds Flow Targets

As we approach the end of the quarter we are closely monitoring our funds flow targets for Enron Americas.  We would like you to let us know if you are planning to enter into any transactions within your groups which will impact those targets, either positively or negatively.  We would like information on all deals which impact significantly our funds flow targets prior to you entering into them.  Please note that this is not just structured transactions but even a storage transaction where we would be injecting would involve cash going out of Enron.

Enron's cash liquidity position is very strong and there is not an issue of whether or not we enter into a transaction but we must ensure we correctly price any transactions and indeed send clear signals to the orginators and traders with regards to our funds flow targets.

Please let John or Louise know if you have any transactions which may occur with funds flow implications.  Should you need any indications of pricing, please contact Joe Deffner.

Louise & John


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/17/2000 10:36 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	11/17/2000 09:41 AM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Bob_Anderson@apses.com>,
<dcazalet@apx.com>, <billr@calpine.com>, <jackp@calpine.com>,
<glwaas@calpx.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, <cabaker@duke-energy.com>,
<gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>,
<KEWH@dynegy.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>,
<curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, <cfi1@tca-us.com>,
<Roger.Pelote@Williams.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: A.00-11-038, SCE's Rate Stabilization Plan Application,
Filedon 11/16/00

Attached is Edison's new "Rate Stabilization Plan," which was filed
yesterday.
?
Dan
Received: from dymwsm08.mailwatch.com by ArterHadden.com; Thu, 16 Nov 2000
19:56:02 -0500
Received: from dymw0106.mailwatch.com (dymw0106.allegro.net [204.253.83.228])
by dymwsm08.mailwatch.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id eAH0uAp06352; Thu, 16
Nov 2000 19:56:10 -0500
Received: from 204.253.83.26 by dymw0106.mailwatch.com with SMTP ( MailWatch
SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.3); Thu, 16 Nov 00 19:55:11 -0500
X-Server-Uuid: 375e765c-57b7-11d4-9046-00508bdcc5eb
Received: from dnsp1.sce.com (dnsp1.sce.com [155.13.48.3]) by
dymwsm11.mailwatch.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eAH0rfM30441; Thu, 16
Nov 2000 19:53:41 -0500
Received: from D058661.sce.com (D058661.sce.com [155.13.167.39]) by
dnsp1.sce.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/5.5.5) with ESMTP id QAA31180; Thu, 16 Nov 2000
16:53:29 -0800
Received: from go2ntswpr01.sce.com (go2ntswpr01.sce.com [155.13.76.17]) by
D058661.sce.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/5.5.5) with ESMTP id QAA38846; Thu, 16 Nov 2000
16:52:49 -0800
Received: from exchcon03.sce.com (unverified) by go2ntswpr01.sce.com (
Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id
<B0001687176@go2ntswpr01.sce.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:52:18 -0800
Received: by exchcon03.sce.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<W9SVSAWQ>; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:52:17 -0800
Message-ID: <0D8AA66F4519D21185AB00805F152113037CC5A5@D060730.sce.com>
From: "Archer, Anthony V" <ARCHERAV@sce.com>
To: "'jbushee@sablaw.com'" <jbushee@sablaw.com>,   "'kmccrea@sablaw.com'"
<kmccrea@sablaw.com>,   "'rogerberliner@bcjlaw.com'"
<rogerberliner@bcjlaw.com>,   "'rcsstl@cdmnet.com'" <rcsstl@cdmnet.com>,
"'anchau@shellus.com'" <anchau@shellus.com>,
"'keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com'"
<keith-sappenfield@reliantenergy.com>,   "'napedersen@jonesday.com'"
<napedersen@jonesday.com>,   "'athomas@newenergy.com'"
<athomas@newenergy.com>,   "'fchristi@arterhadden.com'"
<fchristi@arterhadden.com>,   "'hchoy@isd.co.la.ca.us'"
<hchoy@isd.co.la.ca.us>,   "'lgurick@calpx.com'" <lgurick@calpx.com>,
"'douglass@arterhadden.com'" <douglass@arterhadden.com>,
"'randy_britt@mayco.com'" <randy_britt@mayco.com>,   "'cohnap@sce.com'"
<cohnap@sce.com>, "'costac@sce.com'" <costac@sce.com>,   "'lehrerjm@sce.com'"
<lehrerjm@sce.com>,   "'glwaas@calpx.com'" <glwaas@calpx.com>,
"'uwua@worker.com'" <uwua@worker.com>,   "'dbb@sdcity.sannet.gov'"
<dbb@sdcity.sannet.gov>,   "'jleslie@luce.com'" <jleslie@luce.com>,
"'mshames@ucan.org'" <mshames@ucan.org>,   "'kmelville@sempra.com'"
<kmelville@sempra.com>,   "'btenney@landuselaw.com'"
<btenney@landuselaw.com>,   "'ronknecht@aol.com'" <ronknecht@aol.com>,
"'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'" <furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>,
"'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com'" <mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>,
"'bfinkelstein@turn.org'" <bfinkelstein@turn.org>,
"'theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us'" <theresa_mueller@ci.sf.ca.us>,
"'jjz@cpuc.ca.gov'" <jjz@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'chrisw@greenlining.org'"
<chrisw@greenlining.org>,   "'chrisw@greenlining.org'"
<chrisw@greenlining.org>,   "'ewo@jmbm.com'" <ewo@jmbm.com>,
"'jnnc@chevron.com'" <jnnc@chevron.com>,   "'jlondon@gralegal.com'"
<jlondon@gralegal.com>,   "'phanschen@mofo.com'" <phanschen@mofo.com>,
"'epoole@adplaw.com'" <epoole@adplaw.com>,   "'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'"
<rschmidt@bartlewells.com>,   "'chilen@llgm.com'" <chilen@llgm.com>,
"'eke@aelaw.com'" <eke@aelaw.com>,   "'jsqueri@gmssr.com'"
<jsqueri@gmssr.com>,   "'jbennett@gmssr.com'" <jbennett@gmssr.com>,
"'bloomje@la.whitecase.com'" <bloomje@la.whitecase.com>,
"'peter_bray@newpower.com'" <peter_bray@newpower.com>,
"'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com'" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>,
"'smoss@hooked.net'" <smoss@hooked.net>, "'whe1@pge.com'" <whe1@pge.com>,
"'ssmyers@hooked.net'" <ssmyers@hooked.net>,   "'pat.williams@dhcmail.com'"
<pat.williams@dhcmail.com>,   "'wbooth@booth-law.com'"
<wbooth@booth-law.com>,   "'mgomez1@bart.gov'" <mgomez1@bart.gov>,
"'askaff@energy-law-group.com'" <askaff@energy-law-group.com>,
"'pjpowerlaw@aol.com'" <pjpowerlaw@aol.com>,   "'rrcollins@n-h-i.org'"
<rrcollins@n-h-i.org>,   "'patrickm@crossborderenergy.com'"
<patrickm@crossborderenergy.com>,   "'tomb@crossborderenergy.com'"
<tomb@crossborderenergy.com>,   "'brbarkovich@earthlink.net'"
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>,   "'pjmuller@ricochet.net'"
<pjmuller@ricochet.net>,   "'pmcdonne@wenet.net'" <pmcdonne@wenet.net>,
"'berry@apx.com'" <berry@apx.com>, "'chrism@mid.org'" <chrism@mid.org>,
"'jeff@jbsenergy.com'" <jeff@jbsenergy.com>,   "'cmkehrein@ems-ca.com'"
<cmkehrein@ems-ca.com>,   "'jweil@aglet.org'" <jweil@aglet.org>,
"'abb@eslawfirm.com'" <abb@eslawfirm.com>,   "'dcarroll@dbsr.com'"
<dcarroll@dbsr.com>,   "'dkk@eslawfirm.com'" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>,
"'smutny@iepa.com'" <smutny@iepa.com>,   "'jtachera@energy.state.ca.us'"
<jtachera@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'kmills@cfbf.com'" <kmills@cfbf.com>,
"'aorchard@smud.org'" <aorchard@smud.org>,   "'mpa@aelaw.com'"
<mpa@aelaw.com>,   "'mhg@hetrading.com'" <mhg@hetrading.com>,
"'dws@keywaycorp.com'" <dws@keywaycorp.com>,   "'cread@steptoe.com'"
<cread@steptoe.com>,   "'jogg@jhenergy.com'" <jogg@jhenergy.com>,
"'sdefrawi@efaches.navfac.navy.mil'" <sdefrawi@efaches.navfac.navy.mil>,
"'ad046@detroit.freenet.org'" <ad046@detroit.freenet.org>,
"'mbrubaker@consultbai.com'" <mbrubaker@consultbai.com>,
"'georgeperrault@msn.com'" <georgeperrault@msn.com>,   "'foxba@sce.com'"
<foxba@sce.com>, "'lawcase@sce.com'" <lawcase@sce.com>,
"'picketse@sce.com'" <picketse@sce.com>,   "'jsilva@edisonenterprises.com'"
<jsilva@edisonenterprises.com>,   "'LVanWagenen@sempra.com'"
<LVanWagenen@sempra.com>,   "'jbarthrop@powersavers.com'"
<jbarthrop@powersavers.com>,   "'foothill@lmi.net'" <foothill@lmi.net>,
"'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'" <furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>,
"'kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com'" <kpoole@adamsbroadwell.com>,
"'fosterbc@sce.com'" <fosterbc@sce.com>,   "'ktilton@gralegal.com'"
<ktilton@gralegal.com>,   "'oshirock@pacbell.net'" <oshirock@pacbell.net>,
"'natutt@duanemorris.com'" <natutt@duanemorris.com>,   "'j3m9@pge.com'"
<j3m9@pge.com>,   "'derkp@newsdata.com'" <derkp@newsdata.com>,
"'luluw@newsdata.com'" <luluw@newsdata.com>,   "'ell5@pge.com'"
<ell5@pge.com>, "'jyf1@pge.com'" <jyf1@pge.com>,   "'mrh2@pge.com'"
<mrh2@pge.com>, "'rrh3@pge.com'" <rrh3@pge.com>,
"'ConsumersFirst@worldnet.att.net'" <ConsumersFirst@worldnet.att.net>,
"'gtbl@dynegy.com'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>,   "'jmpa@dynegy.com'"
<jmpa@dynegy.com>,   "'honest@compuserve.com'" <honest@compuserve.com>,
"'emitchel@angnewspapers.com'" <emitchel@angnewspapers.com>,
"'rbw@mrwassoc.com'" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>,   "'difellman@energy-law-group.com'"
<difellman@energy-law-group.com>,   "'dmarcus@slip.net'"
<dmarcus@slip.net>,   "'jeff@hmhresources.com'" <jeff@hmhresources.com>,
"'ed@apx.com'" <ed@apx.com>, "'scottst@mid.org'" <scottst@mid.org>,
"'rmccann@cal.net'" <rmccann@cal.net>,   "'blaising@braunlegal.com'"
<blaising@braunlegal.com>,   "'melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com'"
<melanie_gillette@rmiinc.com>,   "'Slayman@energy.state.ca.us'"
<Slayman@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'jdh@eslawfirm.com'" <jdh@eslawfirm.com>,
"'lmh@eslawfirm.com'" <lmh@eslawfirm.com>,   "'ddavie@hesinet.com'"
<ddavie@hesinet.com>,   "'rliebert@cfbf.com'" <rliebert@cfbf.com>,
"'karen@klindh.com'" <karen@klindh.com>,   "'cpeyton@sacbee.com'"
<cpeyton@sacbee.com>,   "'thaines@smud.org'" <thaines@smud.org>,
"'huse@eesconsulting.com'" <huse@eesconsulting.com>,   "'mer@cpuc.ca.gov'"
<mer@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'ang@cpuc.ca.gov'" <ang@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'ctd@cpuc.ca.gov'" <ctd@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'dlf@cpuc.ca.gov'"
<dlf@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'fua@cpuc.ca.gov'" <fua@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'jlo@cpuc.ca.gov'" <jlo@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'kok@cpuc.ca.gov'"
<kok@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'kth@cpuc.ca.gov'" <kth@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'kim@cpuc.ca.gov'" <kim@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'gig@cpuc.ca.gov'"
<gig@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'rtf@cpuc.ca.gov'" <rtf@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'raw@cpuc.ca.gov'" <raw@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'car@cpuc.ca.gov'"
<car@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'ztc@cpuc.ca.gov'" <ztc@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'dwrlegal1@water.ca.gov'" <dwrlegal1@water.ca.gov>,   "'ath@cpuc.ca.gov'"
<ath@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'LKristov@energy.state.ca.us'"
<LKristov@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'randy.chinn@senate.ca.gov'"
<randy.chinn@senate.ca.gov>,   "'rtavares@energy.state.ca.us'"
<rtavares@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'kmccrea@sablaw.com'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
  "'michael-briggs@reliantenergy.com'" <michael-briggs@reliantenergy.com>,
"'defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil'" <defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil>,
"'rcsstl@cdmnet.com'" <rcsstl@cdmnet.com>,   "'mbrubaker@consultbai.com'"
<mbrubaker@consultbai.com>,   "'alex.goldberg@williams.com'"
<alex.goldberg@williams.com>,   "'barbara_klemstine@apsc.com'"
<barbara_klemstine@apsc.com>,   "'jlyoung@sempra.com'"
<jlyoung@sempra.com>,   "'napedersen@jonesday.com'"
<napedersen@jonesday.com>,   "'athomas@newenergy.com'"
<athomas@newenergy.com>,   "'lgurick@calpx.com'" <lgurick@calpx.com>,
"'douglass@arterhadden.com'" <douglass@arterhadden.com>,   "'reedba@sce.com'"
<reedba@sce.com>,   "'kmelville@sempra.com'" <kmelville@sempra.com>,
"'jbarthrop@powersavers.com'" <jbarthrop@powersavers.com>,
"'btenney@landuselaw.com'" <btenney@landuselaw.com>,   "'gackerman@wptf.org'"
<gackerman@wptf.org>,   "'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'"
<furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>,   "'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com'"
<mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>,   "'bfinkelstein@turn.org'"
<bfinkelstein@turn.org>,   "'jjz@cpuc.ca.gov'" <jjz@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'imoosen@gralegal.com'" <imoosen@gralegal.com>,   "'glsg@pge.com'"
<glsg@pge.com>,   "'phanschen@mofo.com'" <phanschen@mofo.com>,
"'scarter@nrdc.org'" <scarter@nrdc.org>,   "'epoole@adplaw.com'"
<epoole@adplaw.com>,   "'chilen@llgm.com'" <chilen@llgm.com>,
"'jbennett@gmssr.com'" <jbennett@gmssr.com>,   "'jkarp@whitecase.com'"
<jkarp@whitecase.com>,   "'lys@aelaw.com'" <lys@aelaw.com>,
"'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com'" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>,
"'kfyip@seiworldwide.com'" <kfyip@seiworldwide.com>,
"'wbooth@booth-law.com'" <wbooth@booth-law.com>,
"'brbarkovich@earthlink.net'" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>,
"'berry@apx.com'" <berry@apx.com>, "'scottst@mid.org'" <scottst@mid.org>,
"'jeff@jbsenergy.com'" <jeff@jbsenergy.com>,   "'blaising@braunlegal.com'"
<blaising@braunlegal.com>,   "'jsole@caiso.com'" <jsole@caiso.com>,
"'jweil@aglet.org'" <jweil@aglet.org>,   "'abb@eslawfirm.com'"
<abb@eslawfirm.com>,   "'abb@eslawfirm.com'" <abb@eslawfirm.com>,
"'pstohr@dbsr.com'" <pstohr@dbsr.com>,   "'jtachera@energy.state.ca.us'"
<jtachera@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'kmills@cfbf.com'" <kmills@cfbf.com>,
"'mpa@aelaw.com'" <mpa@aelaw.com>,   "'dws@keywaycorp.com'"
<dws@keywaycorp.com>,   "'jazayeria@sec.com'" <jazayeria@sec.com>,
"'LVanWagenen@sempra.com'" <LVanWagenen@sempra.com>,
"'jskillman@prodigy.net'" <jskillman@prodigy.net>,   "'risom@ix.netcom.com'"
<risom@ix.netcom.com>,   "'fosterbc@sce.com'" <fosterbc@sce.com>,
"'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'" <rschmidt@bartlewells.com>,
"'luluw@newsdata.com'" <luluw@newsdata.com>,   "'ell5@pge.com'"
<ell5@pge.com>, "'rbw@mrwassoc.com'" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>,
"'rmccann@cal.net'" <rmccann@cal.net>,   "'karen@klindh.com'"
<karen@klindh.com>,   "'huse@eesconsulting.com'" <huse@eesconsulting.com>,
"'mer@cpuc.ca.gov'" <mer@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'nhc@cpuc.ca.gov'"
<nhc@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'dlf@cpuc.ca.gov'" <dlf@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'jeh@cpuc.ca.gov'" <jeh@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'jmh@cpuc.ca.gov'"
<jmh@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'msw@cpuc.ca.gov'" <msw@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'meb@cpuc.ca.gov'" <meb@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'sfc@cpuc.ca.gov'"
<sfc@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'dhungerf@energy.state.ca.us'"
<dhungerf@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'mjaske@energy.state.ca.us'"
<mjaske@energy.state.ca.us>
cc: "Shotwell, J" <J.P.Shotwell@sce.com>,   "Archer, Anthony V"
<ARCHERAV@sce.com>
Subject: A.00-11-038, SCE's Rate Stabilization Plan Application, Filed on
11/16/00
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:52:01 -0800
Importance: high
X-Priority: 1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-WSS-ID: 160A5E65790641-01-01
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C05030.98CC6C00"

Attached is Southern California Edison Company's Rate Stabilization Plan
Application, A.00-11-038.  This application was filed with the California
Public Utilities Commission today and a copy has been sent, via US Mail, to
the service lists for A.00-01-009 (PTRD) and A.99-01-034 (PTR).

    <<Application>>  <<Testimony>>  <<Chap. V Tables & Figures>>

> The file is an Adobe PDF file, which can be read with the Adobe Acrobat
> Reader.? If you do not have the Adobe Acrobat Reader, it can be obtained
> from the following website at no charge:
> http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html#reader.
>
Sincerely,

Anthony V. Archer
So. Cal. Edison's Legal  Dept.
Tele: 626 302-3104
Pax:: 2-3104
Fax:: 2-2304
Suite 315
 - RSP App, 11-6-00.pdf
 - RSP TEST.pdf
 - SERVICE.PDF


Paul, Joe, & Harry --

We've all talked about holding a meeting to outline our strategy for the next
12 months in the Western states (wholesale and retail) and so I propose the
following.

1. GA Strategy Meeting

We should come together as just GA before meeting with the business people.
I think that we want to have the following people in attendance (like your
input) - Paul Kaufman, Joe Hartsoe, Sarah Novosel, Mary Hain, Marcie Milner,
Steve Walton, Jim Steffes, Harry Kingerski, Sue Mara, Jeff Dasovich, Bruno
Gaillard, Mona Petrochko, Sandi McCubbin.

The meeting output would be a Strategy and Tactics Plan for June 2000 - June
2001.

2. GA meeting w/ Business People

A few of us could go to Belden, Calger, Yang, Benevides, Condon to discuss
the above.

I would like to have these meetings soon (maybe Thursday, Sept 7 for #1).

Please let me know.

Jim


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000033005&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000033005
Request Create Date : 5/4/01 2:34:18 PM
Requested For       : daren.j.farmer@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US NatGas US GAS Physical  Texas
Resource Type       : Applications


Start Date: 2/6/02; HourAhead hour: 19;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020619.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'Admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS5'.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/6/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Why aren't you playing polo?  Has your horse accepted other film roles after
your smashing success in Gladiator?

P.S.  Missed you at the seminar, it's just not the same when you're not
there...!

	Justin Boyd
	10/13/2000 12:52 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

tana - fine with me!

tootoo

..how's it all going?

i'm not playing polo this winter - boohoo!...feeling very deprived!

j

From: Tana Jones on 12/10/2000 13:10 CDT
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

Justy,

I don't think there is any problem with this.  But since Harry told me to run
it by you, I am.  Could you sign off ASAP.  Thanks!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 01:09 PM -----

	Harry M Collins
	10/12/2000 12:29 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

I do not know of any reason that they should not be able to transact UK oil
and products. However, it would be best to also check with London on this
request.

	Tana Jones
	10/12/2000 11:55 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

I don't see any problem with this request, do you?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 11:55 AM -----

	Stephanie Sever
	10/12/2000 11:31 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

Please let me know if this request is OK?

Thanks,
Stephanie
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
11:27 AM ---------------------------

Brant Reves
10/12/2000 11:19 AM
To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK
crude and oil products

We are ok with this request for Utilicorp United, Inc.

brant

From:  Stephanie Sever
     10/12/2000 10:52 AM

To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK crude
and oil products

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
10:48 AM ---------------------------

From:  Mary Griff Gray
     10/12/2000 10:20 AM

To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Utilicorp United (ADM03769) requesting ability to transact UK crude
and oil products

Tom -

What do you think?

Thanks,
Griff
x35753


Hi there.

Could you send me the Word final of the master GE contract which was the
basis for the subsequent facility agreements?  I don't have it in Word- just
WordPerfect.

Thanks,

Kay


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042223.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TRADING_SC: ECH1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/15/2000 07:59 AM -----

	Corporate Benefits
	Sent by: Enron Announcements
	11/14/2000 06:40 PM

		 To: All Enron Worldwide employees
		 cc:
		 Subject: Open Enrollment 2001 Deadline


Q3 - Above 50% probability deals over $1mm.  TOTAL BELOW: $72.2mm

1.	East Power
Cornhusker	75%	$5mm - $6.5mm (El Paso has until 7th September to complete the GP, number to book depends on working capital distribution)
Wind		95%	$35mm ($35mm in hedges - working with Wes's team, looking to book this 9/24/01 when San Antonio comes back on contract reassignment)
AES 		95%	$2mm (milestone payment from AES on Haywood)
Calvert City	5% 	$1mm (site sale)

2.	West Power
Saguaro 	50% 	$1mm (NRG closing other 50% from Edison and will complete ours after that - due 9/15/01)
PSCo		100%	$4.7mm (incremental payment from Fountain Valley)
Las Vegas	90%	$2mm (incremental earnings which we can book on closure - 8/31/01)

3.	ECR
EEX VPP 	50%     $5mm (Issues  - (i) 3rd party equity (ii) credit wrap in insurance market

4.	Gas
CMS		75%	$1mm

5.	Canada
CNR		60%	$1.5mm

6.	Mexico
Vitro		80%	$14mm

7.	Negatives
[Kitchen, Louise]  New Albany ($1.1mm) Repairs to plant pre sale
HPL		Already in the summary but will come in ($7.6mm) below their budget on an annual basis
Bridgeline 	Probably ($13.8 - $17mm) to come in (($2mm) depreciation, ($5mm) accounting errors, ($10mm in underperformance)

Quarter 4
Longview	1% for Q3 / 70% for Q4 	$15mm - $25mm (promote from sale)


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 10/30/00 10:26 AM -----

	Mary Cook
	10/26/00 12:58 PM

		 To: Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason Peters/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Becky Spencer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EGF Legal Employee List

See the list below identifying persons in Global Finance Legal.  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 12:55 PM -----

	Darlene C Forsyth
	10/26/2000 11:47 AM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Nora Dobin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: EGF Legal Employee List


Today would be fine.  Between 12-1pm.
I can sit with you for an informal meeting and see where it goes.   I am located at 3111e.

Thanks,
JForney

-----Original Message-----
From: Simpson, Erik
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 9:43 AM
To: Forney, John M.
Subject: RE: Jobs on the power desk

Can I come down anytime between 12pm and 1pm today or Tuesday anytime?  Which works better for you?

-----Original Message-----
From: Forney, John M.
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 8:33 AM
To: Simpson, Erik
Subject: RE: Jobs on the power desk

Erik,
I will be available earlier than 5:30 for an informal discussion.  I will be in the office Monday and Tuesday of this week.   I will be out the remainder of the week on vacation.
Let me know if this works.

JForney

-----Original Message-----
From: Simpson, Erik
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 11:08 PM
To: Will, Lloyd; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Forney, John M.
Subject: RE: Jobs on the power desk

Doug and John,

Can I move our interview/meeting to 5:30pm monday?  I need to finish up some interviews on the gas desk from 1pm to 5:30pm. Thanks for your consideration.

Erik Simpson
Resume attached

-----Original Message-----
From: Will, Lloyd
Sent: Thu 8/16/2001 7:54 AM
To: Simpson, Erik
Cc: Woulfe, Greg
Subject: RE: Jobs on the power desk

Hows 5PM on Thursday or Friday look.  Just have Claudia Guerra 853-4588  place the time in my calendar.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Simpson, Erik
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:40 PM
To: Will, Lloyd
Cc: Woulfe, Greg
Subject: Jobs on the power desk

Lloyd,

I wanted to try to set up an appointment with you regarding any opportunities on the power desk.

I have worked for Greg Woulfe and Jim Fallon managing the advertising trading in EBS and formerly on the Coal desk for Dan Reck and George McClellan.

How does your schedule look tomorrow or Friday?

Thanks for your time,

Erik Simpson
3-0600


Kim,

Sorry about the fax quality.  I will be glad to go over the material with you this morning when you come by to see Jack.

Thanks,
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Monday, February 11, 2002 5:34 PM
To:	Hugo, Gary
Subject:	RE: Message from Morris Brassfield - ETS Travel and Entertainment Card Announcement

Gary,

Henry did fax me some of the literature, but the quality of the fax is such that it is hard to read.  I am meeting with Jack tomorrow at 10:30, how about I stop by and see you.

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hugo, Gary
Sent:	Monday, February 11, 2002 4:57 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	RE: Message from Morris Brassfield - ETS Travel and Entertainment Card Announcement

Kim,

Henry said he provided you with the requested information.  I wanted to follow-up and see if you had any questions or if we can be of further service.  I will be happy to expedite a Visa Platinum card for you.  Please let me know.

Thanks,
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hugo, Gary
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:37 PM
To:	Gonzales, Henry
Subject:	FW: Message from Morris Brassfield - ETS Travel and Entertainment Card Announcement

Henry,

While I am out, would you please do a comparison for Kim.  She is one of our directors.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Gary

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:24 PM
To:	Hugo, Gary
Subject:	FW: Message from Morris Brassfield - ETS Travel and Entertainment Card Announcement

Gary,

We just received this information regarding our new corporate expense card.  I'm not sure I see any benefits by getting one of the new Wright Travel Cards vs. using the EFCU.  Would you please look this over and let me know your thoughts.  If I choose to stay with the EFCU, I would probably like to get  a different card from the current EFCU Master Card so that I can keep my business and personal charges separate.

Can you provide me your thoughts?

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:53 PM
To:	Donoho, Lindy; Harris, Steven; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Robertson, Audrey; Watson, Kimberly; Y'barbo, Paul
Subject:	FW: Message from Morris Brassfield - ETS Travel and Entertainment Card Announcement

TW Commercial Team, please complete the attached application as soon as possible and forward to me.  I will compile all applications and submit to Kim for approval.

Kim, I will forward your application to Steve for approval.

Thanks guys.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	ETS General Announcements
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:10 PM
To:	DL-GA-all_ets
Subject:	Message from Morris Brassfield - ETS Travel and Entertainment Card Announcement

I am pleased to announce completion of negotiations with Wright Express to provide a travel and entertainment program for Enron Operations Services Company.   Travel and entertainment cards will be provided to any individual employed by the pipeline companies, who is required to travel on company business.   Each employee will be required to complete the attached application and agreement form, secure management approval and fax to Mary Ann Johnson at (713) 345-3479.   The T&E card will be mailed directly to the applicant.

Implementation
Employees may use the T&E cards for domestic and international business travel.  Monthly, each employee will be required to complete an expense report utilizing the XMS system, if expenses are incurred.  https://expensexms.enron.com/ewp/ .    Approved business travel expenses will be reimbursed to the employee via direct deposit or check, depending on how your payroll is currently processed.  Personal use of the card is discouraged.

The Wright Express travel and entertainment card has contingent liability, whereas, the employee's personal credit may be evaluated if:
*	Outstanding balances exceeding $3,500 or delinquent payments beyond 25 days past the due date.
*	A monthly line of credit for business travel exceeding $3,500.

Employees who are required to travel on Company business and expect to exceed the monthly $3,500 spending limit, may request a higher limit.  If you routinely require a spending limit exceeding $3,500 per month, please check the box under "Company Information" on the attached application form.  Your request will be submitted to Enron Operations Service Management and Wright Express for approval.  You will be notified of approval or denial concerning your request.

All travel and entertainment MasterCard accounts are due each month to Wright Express.  Failure, by the employee to pay Wright Express each month, submit expense reports or submit receipts may trigger card cancellation.

Procedure
The travel and entertainment procedure can be found on the ETS website at http://www.ets.enron.com/pandSM/Employees will be responsible to review this procedure and comply with all requirements.  Following receipt of the signed, approved application and employee agreement form, employees should expect to receive a T&E credit card within ten to fifteen working days, but no later than March 15, 2002.

Card Activation:
Upon receipt of the travel and entertainment card, you will be required to follow the instructions on the sticker using the activation call-in number.  Following activation, you may immediately begin to use your T&E card.

Rewards Program
Wright Express travel card holders may participate in a rewards program, which is outlined in an attached document.  All fees charged by Wright Express for the rewards program is the employee's personal responsibility.

Please address all questions concerning the travel and entertainment program to Bruce Martin 713-345-1833, Cheri Sublet 713-345-3475, Mary Ann Johnson 713-345-3479 or Morris Brassfield 713-646-7006.

Application		Agreement		Procedure		     Rewards

 << File: Wright Express Enron MCemployee App.doc >>          << File: Wright TRAVEL AND ENTERTAINMENT PROGRAM Agreement form.doc >>             << File: ETS Travel Procedure 1-31-02.doc >>              << File: WEX MC Rewards0101.pdf >>


713-646-8453

Laurie Ellis@ENRON
04/02/2001 12:27 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Imbalance trades on CNG

It is a CES deal.  I have some support that Cindy faxed me.  What is your fax
number and I'll send it to you.

Thanks for your help
Laurie

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Chris Germany @ ECT                           04/02/2001 12:07 PM

To: Laurie Ellis/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Imbalance trades on CNG

I just left Cingy a message  - I said that I'm not aware of any imbalance
trades that we intiated.  However, it could have been done by CES or EES.  I
asked her to call me back.

Laurie Ellis@ENRON
04/02/2001 09:56 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Imbalance trades on CNG

Chris, I am still trying to get these imbalance trades resolved.  John Bieltz
is no longer with Amereda Hess but Cindy Wernecke has been working this
issue.  She can be reached at (703) 317-2293.  Can you please get back to me
as soon as possible as they would like to resolve.

Thanks
Laurie
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurie Ellis/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 09:53
AM ---------------------------

Laurie Ellis
11/22/2000 01:03 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Imbalance trades on CNG

No, I still haven't gotten anywhere on this.  My contact at Amereda Hess
(formerly Statoil) is John Bieltz.  His number is 703-317-2318 and his email
is jbieltz@hess.com.  Thanks for your help.

Laurie

Chris Germany@ECT
11/22/2000 12:48 PM
To: Laurie Ellis/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Imbalance trades on CNG

I'm sorry I have not responded sooner.  Any new developement on this?  To my
knowledge, ENA has not done any imbalance trades.  Do you have a contact at
Statoil?  I can call and try to get more info.  It could be some CES thing we
were not aware of.

Laurie Ellis@ENRON
11/01/2000 02:55 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Imbalance trades on CNG

Chris, do you have any information on an imbalance trade with Statoil on CNG
Niagara Mohawk for January and April 2000?  Statoil has been very patient
awaiting payment on this, but I cannot seem to find anything.  Gloria
Barkowsky suggested that I talk to you.  Thanks for your help.

Laurie Ellis


For your information.  The outcome was great for TW because the Cal. PUC
adopted our receipt point proposal, eliminating the danger of mandated
restriction of TW's deliveries to the California border.  The outcome is not
so great for Enron overall because they rejected our proposed settlement.
The receipt point proposal was able to survive since it was part of both of
the competing settlements.
I'm still trying to get thru the whole order; let me know if you have
questions.
S.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 11/27/2000
09:20 AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/22/2000 06:28 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Bad Proposed Decision

Well, this shows the direction in which the "new" Commission is heading.  The
very good news, though, is that  TW's proposal was included in both
settlements (now that's hedging!).  Thus,  the benefits to TW were preserved
under both proposals.  Congratulations.  That's fantastic--hard work that
paid off.

We will of course express out extreme dissappointment with the PD, and point
out that this decision condemns California to a 20th century infrastructure,
when the state's 21st century economy demands much, much better.

We should discuss.  Since the PD empowers the likes of Norm and Florio, it
will be important to play very close attention to implementation of Hector.

Sorry to have to be the one to deliver the news.   But we have a knack of
making lemonade out of lemons and we'll do out best to do the same here,
whatever turns up at the end.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/22/2000 05:53 PM -----

	Michael.Alexander@sce.com
	11/22/2000 05:27 PM

		 To: Paul_Amirault%SCE@sce.com, tomb@crossborderenergy.com, burkee@cts.com,
craigc@calpine.com, rick.counihan@greenmountain.com, jdasovic@enron.com,
MDay@GMSSR.com, Douglas.Porter@sce.com
		 cc: Colin.Cushnie@sce.com, INGGM@sce.com
		 Subject:

The PD in the Gas Restructuring is out.   I have yet to read the whole
thing, but the title "Approval With Modifications Of The Interim
Settlement..." does not bode well.  According to Steve Watson (and I only
have Steve's statement second hand), the decision reflects a fear that the
timing is wrong in light of the current volatile gas price market.

(See attached file: Proposed.doc)

--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
626-302-2029
626-302-3254 (fax)

 - Proposed.doc


Bruce:  I am tied up for lunch, but let's get together during the day on
Monday or Tuesday.   Mark

	Bruce Lundstrom@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	10/20/2000 09:25 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lunch

Mark -

Are you free for lunch next week?  Breakfast or a beer after work would work
as well.

In my view, APACHI has a limited life span and I'd like to see what
opportunities there still might be for the remaining lawyers/legal
specialists in my group.

Thanks,
Bruce


Good Morning Jay:

We would like to order the following "Denim (Tencel)" shirts for the
Research Group.  This would be the long sleeve shirts with the
"Research" Logo over the left pocket.

Men's Medium		6
Men's Large		2
Ladies Small		1
Ladies Medium	1
Ladies Large		1
	TOTAL		11

If you need any other information, please let me know

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group
713-853-5290
Email: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com


Gerald,

If you are ok with this, would you please put together executable copies for us to sign and get to Ormat.  If not, let me know.

Thanks,
Chris Hilgert
Enron Compression Services
Work: 713-853-7350
Cell:   713-857-2479
www.enron.com/compression

-----Original Message-----
From: Hank Leibowitz [mailto:hleibowitz@ormat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:25 PM
To: Hilgert, Chris
Subject: RE: Confidentiality Agreement

Chris,
The CA looks okay.  I made one change in para 4 that requires Enron to identify and mark the confidential information sent to Ormat.  I presume that not ALL correspondence between us will have to do with structured horsepower transactions.

See attached.

Hank

-----Original Message-----
From: Hilgert, Chris [mailto:Chris.Hilgert@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 2:24 PM
To: hleibowitz@ormat.com
Cc: Bennett, Peter
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Hank,

You will find attached a confidentiality agreement as discussed for your
review.  We will call you early next week to discuss the potential
Transwestern deal further.  Have a good weekend.

 <<Confid--Ormat11.DOC>>

Thanks,
Chris Hilgert
Director
Enron Compression Services
Work: 713-853-7350
Cell:   713-857-2479
www.enron.com/compression


Fine by me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kean, Steven J.
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 4:49 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Whalley, Greg; Fallon, Jim; McMahon, Jeffrey
Cc:	Clark, Mary; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Denne, Karen
Subject:

Please review for send out Monday.

 << File: 111601Announcement.doc >>