Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 11/19/01.   The Yuma Companies (Inc.) has been added to this week's "Call Credit" column.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923,  Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or Darren Vanek at x3-1436.


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
11/01/2000 10:33 AM
To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Canadian deals in US books.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000
10:33 AM ---------------------------

Stacey Vallejo
11/01/2000 09:22 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Luchas Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherry
Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Carrie Coldiron/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Canadian deals in US books.

Just a quick request for you to go into all your books to make sure that
there are no ECC deals booked there.  If there are any that are with
counterparties other than RISKMANTRA, they need to be flipped to the
FT-US/CAND-ERMS book as soon as possible.  Invoicing for November should
start today, and both ECC and ENA are held back from invoicing until these
deals are fixed, as the deals will be invoiced by the wrong Enron
counterparty if they aren't.  If you could please let me know when the deals
have been fixed, I can let the accounting department in Houston know when
they can start invoicing as well.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about this matter.

Thank you
Stacey


Tim, the answer to this is yes.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:54 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Cc:	Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Leslie; Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	RE: Dec and Jan liquidations

Sorry to be such a pest, but I'm still not crystal clear.

Should the west desk update in "Schedule" all transactions that flowed in December?
_____	Yes
_____	No

If yes, when do we need to have it done by?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:51 AM
To:	Belden, Tim
Cc:	Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Leslie; Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	RE: Dec and Jan liquidations

Tim,

John's communication regarding not updating December was in order to complete December liquidations for accounting and settlements last week.  However, we were then informed that settlements would not draft their billing until the 14th of January so we then retracted our 'hold' on updating December schedule.  Any updates that can be made in order for settlements to get the most accurate data would be most appreciated.

In addition, the cash flow forecast (as indicated by Don) will be coordinated through Kristin.  I do not believe you will have to do any work for this as all the data will come from our risk calculations and true settlement information.

Thanks,
Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Belden, Tim
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:26 AM
To:	Postlethwaite, John; Reeves, Leslie; Calger, Christopher F.; White, Stacey W.; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Wax, Brandon
Cc:	Scholtes, Diana; Semperger, Cara; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: Dec and Jan liquidations

Yesterday I was approached by Steve Thome who had been asked by Brandon Wax (who was asked by Don Miller?) looking for a cash forecast for deals that flowed in December.  While I'd like to be helpful, I have never done a cash forecast before.  We don't have the tools set up in Portland to do this sort of thing.  The data to do this has historically resided in Enpower.  A week ago the West Power desk met and agreed that we were able to and prepared to update Enpower in "Schedule" for all of the deals that flowed in December.  Diana Scholtes sent an e-mail (below) to Leslie Reeves on January 3rd indicating that we were prepared to update Enpower.  We heard from John Postlethwaite that Leslie didn't want us to update Schedule -- instead they could work off of our trade sheets.

I don't care which way we move forward.  It just seems that we aren't all on the same page.  We just want to do whatever needs to be done to get the right information to the right people.  Exerience tells me that we are better off doing it "right" the first time.  I am hoping that between Don, Leslie, and Stacey we can get some clear direction on what you would like us to do.  As of now, there is little I can do to assist Brandon with his request for a cash flow projection.

Regards,
Tim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:10 PM
To:	Reeves, Leslie; Calger, Christopher F.; White, Stacey W.; Belden, Tim
Cc:	Scholtes, Diana; Semperger, Cara
Subject:	Dec and Jan liquidations

It has come to my attention that there seems to be miscommunication between various groups and people about how Dec and Jan scheduling for non-terminated deals should be handled. There are conflicting reports that Houston, through the estate, will handle updating scheduling in Enpower or that the scheduling group should be updating Enpower accordingly.

What I am hoping for is that by whatever communications means necessary we can come to a final action plan on how to clean this and get Enpower up to date as quickly and as accurately as possible.

Thanks,

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scholtes, Diana
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:43 AM
To:	Reeves, Leslie
Cc:	Gilbert, Scotty; Postlethwaite, John; Belden, Tim
Subject:	January Settlements

Leslie,

I'm trying to get a jump on making sure we have everything done properly in Enpower for the month of January.  My question is whether we, the West desk, should enter any changes in Enpower due to OUR non-delivery and/or incremental deals?  We have everything recorded on our Trade sheets, but if it would make it easier for you to settle or relay to the Estate by us making the changes in Deal Scheduling, we can do so.

I also understand, after talking to John, you will be using our Trade sheets for such changes for the month of December.  I'm not sure who you would like us to assist in translating our sheets, but if you can call me, we can set up a conference call and I'll coordinate from each desk to attend.

If there is anything else that you need us to do to help your group please let me know.

Diana Scholtes
West Desk
503-464-3807


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/09/2000 08:39 AM -----

	<Mike_Pate@oxy.com>
	06/09/2000 08:35 AM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Status Update

Carol:

What a coincidence!  I just pulled it out of my bag and promised myself I
would work on it today.   As questions arise that are beyond my authority to
address, I will so advise.

Mike Pate
Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc.

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Carol St Clair [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
  Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 5:29 PM
  To: Mike_Pate@oxy.com
  Subject: Status Update

  Mike:
  Could you please leave me a quick e-mail letting me know
where things stand with
  respect to your review of the comments that I faxed to you
as my credit people
  have been asking about it?  Thanks.

  Carol St. Clair
  EB 3892
  713-853-3989 (Phone)
  713-646-3393 (Fax)
  carol.st.clair@enron.com


Gil:  I left you a voice mail earlier.  I'm concerned about the definition of "Specified Transaction".  As drafted, I read this as cross defaulting to all other derivative trades between ENA and BSIL, as well as ENE and BSIL.  I don't know if we have any on the books or will enter into any prior to termination of your trades, but the same will be impacted unless you limit the Section 14 definition to your trades only.

-----Original Message-----
From: Melman, Gil M.
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara; Rohauer, Tanya; Theriot, Kim S.
Subject: FW: Revised Documentation

Attached is the close to final documentation evidencing the 2 trades we've just made with Bear Stearns International. We anticipate signing these either later today or tomorrow.

-----Original Message-----
From: Froom, Ilene (Exchange) [mailto:ifroom@bear.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 5:25 PM
To: Melman, Gil M.
Cc: Cooke, Peter Confidential Memo-Counsel (Exchange); Guinchard, Claude
(Exchange)
Subject: RE: Revised Documentation

Gil:

Please see the revised documentation.

Thank you.

Ilene

 <<Enron VWAPtion 101201.pdf>>  <<Enron Forward 101201.pdf>>

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Froom, Ilene (Exchange)
> Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 11:09 AM
> To:	'gil_melman@enron.net'
> Cc:	Cooke, Peter Confidential Memo-Counsel (Exchange); Guinchard, Claude
> (Exchange)
> Subject:	Revised Documentation
>
> Gil:
>
> Attached are the revised documents.  There are two versions of each, a
> redlined copy and a clean copy.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ilene Froom
>
>
>  << File: Enron Forward Clean.pdf >>  << File: NY14468 Enron North America
> Corp.mark-up.pdf >>  << File: NY14468 Enron VWAPtion.mark-up.pdf >>  <<
> File: Enron VWAPtion Clean.pdf >>


Folks,

I thought it would be a good idea to  review what we discussed
yesterday, on August 23 in Folsom at the ISO, so there is no public
misunderstanding about our discussion, or our intent.

Yesterday's meeting at the ISO, at which WPTF had many of its members
who either have generation in the State, or import power into
California, was for market participants and the ISO to discuss how to
bring more order and price transparency to the ISO's out of market
calls.  WPTF had met on its own initiative several weeks before with
members from the California PX, and APX to identify a suitable product
that would satisfy the ISO's needs during or to avoid system
emergencies.  Also, we sought a matching service of parties willing to
sell into a super-peak firm energy market with those who are willing to
purchase.

APX and CalPX responded to our earlier discussions with specific product
proposals, and presented their proposals to the group at yesterday's
meeting.  The discussions which ensued during the course of that meeting
focused on how the ISO might utilize a product/service to reduce the
manpower requirements currently needed to satisfy its out of market
telephone calls, typically on short notice, and the interest on the part
of market participants to make bids into either the APX or CalPX's
proposed system for a super-peak firm-energy product.

There were no  commitments made by any party, simply a willingness to
work together to alleviate the problems associated with finding
sufficient electric power during high demand periods with greater
transparency, more participants, and greater market efficiency.

There was no discussion of commodity prices, price fixing, or bid
strategies.

Gary B. Ackerman


FYI   -- just so you can see what went on this week, when you return.

Beth

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Philipson, Fred
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Apollo, Beth; Neuner, Dale; Thomas, Sheri; 'jdenny@enron.com'
Cc: Scribner, James; Jafry, Rahil
Subject: Minutes from Back Office Services meeting held morning of 3-12

All:

Here's a summary of our meeting this morning.  As we begin to lay the
groundwork for this project, I think it's important to summarize our thoughts
and activities in writing.  If any of you have comments or corrections,
please feel free.

Thanks,

Fred Philipson
5-9323

Minutes from Back Office Services meeting held morning of 3-12
Attending:
James Scribner	Trans Support		Sheri Thomas	Trans Support
Beth Apollo	Trans Support		Dale Neuner	Trans Support
Jennifer De Boisblanc	Trans Support		Fred Philipson	ENW Origination
Objective
Enron is sizing up the opportunity to offer internal back office processing
services to external clients. Objective of this meeting was to understand the
spreadsheet meant to estimate the potential P&L for this offering.
Overview
Looked at spreadsheet for validation:
? Need to better determine the actual market for this service.
? Need to better understand the current revenue and expense projections and
assumptions, expanding on them to include customers not currently with Enron.
Ongoing:
Defining the size of the market:
? There may be three +levels, of markets for these services - one for energy
risk mgt. ops (attack first), a larger market if we include global market
offerings, and yet a larger market if we think of our offering as transaction
processing, ala ADP.
? There are a number of ways to derive the potential market size.  The
current spreadsheet identifies existing customers.  Some may be seeking our
services based on their current and projected deal volumes.
? Fred will continue to analyze the market size(s), adding customers outside
of current EOL spectrum.
? Fred will analyze the offerings and pricing structures used by competitors.
? Sheri will get with internal data owners to (in)validate current
spreadsheet numbers and identify customers with high year-over-year increases
in EOL transaction volume.

Expenses
? James will take a harder look at the expenses.  We wonder if number of
transactions is the best method to use.  What is the real cost driver?  Where
are the +breaking points,, or transaction levels where we must invest further
to offer services to additional customers?

Strategy
? Beth Apollo will schedule a meeting with Beth Perlman, Jenny Rub, Rahil, et
al to discuss ongoing big picture.
? Beth will also schedule a meeting with Mark Taylor, to include Rahil and
Dale.  They will discuss points on the service level agreement that we will
use with our external customers.


Shoot.  Due to a conflict on Monday, I'm now scheduled to arrive in Houston
on Tuesday at 10 am.  I return to Omaha at 8 PM  on Wednesday.  If there is
anything on Mark's schedule consistent with those constraints, please let me
know.  Thanks. DF

Sandra Evans @ ECT on 05/11/2000 11:59:17 AM
To: Drew Fossum
cc:

Subject: Meeting with Mark Schroeder

Mark has asked me to email you, to find out a suitable time to meet him.
He is pretty booked up for both days, but asked, either 05/15/00 for dinner,
or early 05/16/00 for breakfast.
Can you let myself, or Sandra (who will be back tomorrow) know so that we can
schedule it for him.

Thank you
Sharna


To whom it may concern: I need the Microsoft outlook web access icon downloaded to my computer

	thanks michael.yowman@enron.com


Never did... but glad we were here to ensure it was captured.

BT

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:24 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: CMS Deal Booked

Good job.  I bet you never thought you would retrade the transport this much.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:21 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Subject:	CMS Deal Booked

Louise, further to our meeting last week, the contracts have been executed and the Rockies transportation has been sold to CMS. Origination and trading participated in the P&L.  Orig = $ 1,045,000.  Trading approx $310,000.

We are a little closer to our Q3 targets of $ 2MM in sept.

Please call if there are any questions.

BT


#1- Was supposed to be a "meat haul"...not a trophy hunt.
#2- Landing nets are for boats.
#3- The thrill of avoiding a "barbing" by one of the many treble hooks connected to typical plugs intensifies the experience. See Zander experience in the surf.
#4- CCA gets plenty of my money already...see Chad and I at Crawfish Boil.
#5- Addendum to item #2: Landing nets are for old people. Or fags.

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
	Sent: Thu 5/30/2002 2:27 PM
	To: Brian Constantine; akoenig@hhw-law.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; john.chambers@bisys.com
	Cc:
	Subject: RE: surf looking realy good

	Join tournament and keep a landing net with you on your trophy hunts.

	>From: "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com>
	>To: "Erik Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>, <akoenig@hhw-law.com>,
	><knipe3@msn.com>, <chet_fenner@bmc.com>, <Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net>,
	><john.chambers@bisys.com>
	>Subject: RE: surf looking realy good
	>Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:25:10 -0500
	>
	>OOooohhhhh...just looked at the Surfside cam and its...well, damn. Its ON
	>boys. Go...go now...do not wait. Cancel all evening appointments and go.
	>Wind is 6 mph out of the Northwest...that wont last long.
	>
	>Report from yesterday...Fished West side of Pelican Island shoreline on
	>point closest to Sand Island  waist deep over shell. Caught 6 on
	>Chart/Orange/blue Top Dog and blue/chart/silver mirrolure.
	>LOST THE STAR TOURNEY LEADER TROUT!!!! Blew up on TopDog, got her to
	>hand...I was shaking like a freaking leaf. Made "the grab" she exploded out
	>of my hand, threw the hook, and Top Dog lodged in my shirt!!! 2nd 28?plus
	>trout I've lost on that shoreline in 2 years!!! Then, after I quit shaking
	>and what not, I realized I wasn't even ENTERED in the damn tourney, so I am
	>glad I didn't catch her!!! She was every inch of 28 and fat with hardly any
	>spots. Big, old female. Damn I love fishing.
	>
	>                                                                               OINK
	>
	>-----Original Message-----
	>From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
	>Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 9:30 AM
	>To: akoenig@hhw-law.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com;
	>Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; john.chambers@bisys.com; Brian Constantine
	>Subject: surf looking realy good
	>
	>surf cams show flat and green. fishing reports positive. forcast unkown.
	>Zander says he will fish surf tomorrow am if looks good. Alfred, you still
	>planning on going down tonight for your galveston hearing?
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>_________________________________________________________________
	>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
	>

	_________________________________________________________________
	MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
	http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


Kay--I finally got it to blackline correctly.  Here it is.  Also attached is
a sample availability provision (actually 2 different versions).

 - redvepco.doc
 - SAMPLE.DOC


Set up with Judy Smith 36244 10/02/00 - jar
Also interviewing with Hannon, McMahon, McConnell . .


REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
TO SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN FIRST COALITION/
KALAMAZOO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE JOINT EVENT
ON THE ECONOMY
Western Michigan University
Kalamazoo, Michigan

*********************************************************

Energy Issues are highlighted in bold text.


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/18/2000 09:35 AM -----

	Susan Bailey
	05/16/2000 08:17 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Puget Sound Energy Agreement

Sara,

Steve Morus @ Puget Sound asked that I forward the attached on to you for
review and comment.

Advise if I may of assistance.

Susan

----- Forwarded by Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2000 08:15 AM -----

	"Morus, Steve" <smorus@puget.com>
	05/15/2000 05:05 PM

		 To: "'Bailey, Susan (Enron North Am)'" <susan.bailey@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Puget Sound Energy Agreement

Susan,
Per our phone discussion, please forward the attached agreement (in two
files) to Sara Shackleton.  As I've previously discussed with Sara, the
executables have been routed upstairs for signature by our executives.  I
will mail them to you as soon as they are signed.  In the meantime, the
attached files are intended to give you all a jump on your review.  Please
call if you have any questions.  I can be reached at 425 462-3688, or on my
pager at 888 731-9937.
Thanks,
-Steve Morus

 <<Master Agmt for Swap Transactions.DOC>>  <<Annex A for Swaps Merged
version.doc>>

 - Master Agmt for Swap Transactions.DOC
 - Annex A for Swaps Merged version.doc


The Corporate Marketing team along with members of other BU's will be holding
a mid year off-site on Aug 3. The objectives are to enhance their marketing
knowledge, refine our strategy, learn more about the resources that exist
within Enron, and discuss ways in which we can add greater value to the
business.

Our off-site will be held at the Woodlands Conference Center, and I would
like to invite you to speak to about (20 to 25 people) for a half an hour on
Friday morning. I know you live close by, so I hope this won't be an
inconvience. Since our department fosters entrepreneurial thinking and seeks
to learn more about new initiatives within Enron, all would benefit from
hearing from you specifically about the following: The objectives for
government and regulatory affairs domestically; how California may have
disrupted Enron's plans; key objectives that need to be achieved, the
strategies you are employing; and the role that marketing can play (if any)
in the process.

Please let me know if you will be available to join us, and we can discuss
specifics closer to the date.

Best regards,
Dennis


Good morning.

Further to Steve's comments below, I am also wondering what the new language
in the Assignment of Interests adds or is intended to add beyond the
language in the prior paragraph 2.  Are there obligations of VLDC outside
the Haywood LLC that are intended to be assigned by the new language?  If
so, then as Steve suggests, we need to make sure that AES knows what the
universe includes and gets related reps and warranties.  The reps and
warranties under the SPA reach only to the obligations of Haywood.

Thanks

Audrey.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Hase [mailto:shase@aesc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 8:27 AM
To: aroffwarg@bracepatt.com; prollin@aesc.com; aroffwarg@bracepatt.com;
cthompson@bracepatt.com; szisman@ect.enron.com; ben.f.jacoby@enron.com;
chris.booth@enron.com; fred.mitro@enron.com; kay.mann@enron.com;
alouison@hunton.com
Subject: Assignor's Obligations -- Due Dligence

Ben and Aaron,

We note in the Assignment of Interest document sent yesterday, there is a
new section 2, whereby AES would be assuming all of the obligations of
Volunter Land Development Company.

We need to perform due diligence on what those obligations are and whether
they have changed since the SPA was executed.  We need the following
information for determining what obligations VLDC has incurred:

1)  financial statements of the LLC
What debts does the LLC owe and to whom?
2)  list of all the agreements entered into by the company
(to my knowledge, there is the system impact study agreemt with TVA
Any other agreements with TVA, like a Keep Whole letter?
3)  copies of any new agreements not already delivered in the Binder dated
Nov 2000?
4)  any tax agreements with the County or any other public entity?
5) any amendments to your land option agreements with Mann or English?

I'd appreciate your review of these matters as soon as possible to keep
our scheduled closing on track.

I'll be meeting with Ben at 8:00CT.  Our call remains at 2:00PM CT same #
as before.

Steve Hase


Steve Kean and I believe quite strongly, within a four peer group structure,  that we need to allocate somewhere between 30 and 50 percent of Gov't./ public  Affairs out of commercial support into specialized technical- there is a clear divide between individuals in the Gov't/public  Affairs groups  who are managing significant risk for the company and having a significant and  direct impact on commercial activities/ net income( these individuals should be moved to specialized technical)....and others who are performing a less strategic function( who should remain in the commercial support category). With that said, it is probably not necessary to undertake this effort for  mid-year PRC purposes since we are probably moving to a three peer stucture where that split could be achieved (for year-end purposes where the compensation impact would be felt). If we stay with the four group stucture, I intend to push hard for the remapping of Gov't Affairs by year-end.
    On a completely seperate issue, I continue to be  very concerned about the impact of the "preferred" distribution  relative to the bottom category for " commercial support" groups(I'm not implying this is'nt an issue for commercial groups- I just don't have the same ability to assess the impact there)....the concern, simply stated,  is that  it may be entirely  counterproductive to force individuals who are not performance problems  into a category that has significant implications for their careers here at Enron, particularly after going thru the past year where many of the non-performers in my group and others  were moved out of the company- the replacement costs for moving good performers out of the company for the sake of a "preferred" distribution are quite high...and that is even before you begin  to assess the incalcuable damage to morale that will invariably occour.
       Thanks.

	Enron Energy Services  From:  David W Delainey @ EES                           05/10/2001 10:26 AM

Sent by:	Kay Chapman@EES
To:	David W Delainey/HOU/EES, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/Enron@EnronXGate, Wes Colwell/Enron@EnronXGate, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Kopper/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey McMahon/Enron@EnronXGate, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT, James Derrick/Corp/Enron, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, David Oxley/HOU/ECT, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert W Jones/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Joyce/Enron@EnronXGate, Marla Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT, Andrea Yowman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron, Elspeth Inglis/Corp/Enron

Subject:	PEER GROUP MAPPING

Following my note last week please find attached the consolidated peer group mapping for all business units. This mapping is intended to illustrate from a functional view point where each activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

We were considering moving to a 3 Peer Group Structure however it as agreed at the last PRC Committee Meeting  to stay with the current structure since the data had been cleaned and everyone felt generally comfortable where most activities had been placed with the exception of just  2 or 3. It was agreed that we should concentrate on resolving these rather than undertaking an organization wide remapping excercise to consolidate to 3 Peer Groups. All functions/activities within the business units should now be reflected on the acttached.

The actions points from this excercise are:

1	to review and agree the attached mapping

2    consider and comment on highlighted groups that we have discussed in previous PRC meetings and ask for your comments or objections to moving them 	as indicated on the attachment.

3	invite your comments or questions on any other function that you consider questionable or requiring further explanation.

      Please return your comments to David Oxley by Friday May 25.

      To have this discussion now will save lengthy discussions in the final VP/MD PRC Meetings.  Definitions of the peer groups are also attached for your ease of
      reference.


> Subject: Life......
>
>  <<CompuServe GIF graphic>>

 - math2.gif


Guys:
Looks like the ACE folks are not available tomorrow.  Would a call with them
on Wednesday morning at 9 (Houston time) work?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

 - 11-26 1300 Report.xls


---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Halliburton/Corp/Enron on 05/25/2000
09:05 AM ---------------------------

Chonawee Supatgiat
05/22/2000 11:56 AM
To: Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Halliburton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: CPLEX

---------------------- Forwarded by Chonawee Supatgiat/Corp/Enron on
05/22/2000 11:55 AM ---------------------------
From: Samer Takriti@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 05/22/2000 11:46 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chonawee Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications

Subject: CPLEX

Stinson,
Krishna mentioned that Tom wants to buy (may have bought) Xpress. Tom's
argument is that Xpress's language allows the user to express special ordered
sets (certain types of constraints) in a convenient fashion. Chonawee and I
just talked to two of Cplex's consultants (whom I know personally). They both
mentioned that these sets are recognized and handled implicitly within Cplex.
As a result, there is no need for their modeling language to express these
constraints explicitly.
As a result, I feel that we should go with Cplex. Both Chonawee and Krishna
seem to have the same impression. I need to get a final vote on this one so
that we can order the licenses. This has been dragging on for too long.
-Samer
[Chonawee, my address book does not recognize ENA users. Please forward to
Grant, Krishna, and Tom]


please print this plus all attachments.  MHC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lyons, Dan
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 4:43 PM
To:	Murray, Julia; Van Hooser, Steve; 'rastin@velaw.com'; Douglas, Stephen H.; Blumenthal, Jeff; Cash, Michelle
Cc:	Mccormick, George
Subject:	FW: Operating Agreement/Ancillary Agreements
Importance:	High

The first draft...Ron, please distribute to the appropriate VE folks...those of you scheduled for the Monday pm meeting to discuss, see you there....XOXOXO
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Denton, Matthew T." <MTDenton@GAPAC.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Denton+2C+20Matthew+20T+2E+22+20+3CMTDenton+40GAPAC+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 14, 2001 4:39 PM
To:	Mccormick, George
Cc:	Lyons, Dan; 'rastin@velaw.com'
Subject:	Operating Agreement/Ancillary Agreements
Importance:	High

George, attached for Enron's review and comments, please find initial drafts of the following documents:

1.	LLC Operating Agreement
2.	Black Liquor Exchange Agreement
3.	Tall Oil Purchase Agreement
4.	Turpentine Broker Agreement
5.	Wood Fiber Supply Agreement
6.	Leaf River Services Agreement
7.	Material Spreading Agreement
8.	Pulp Supply Agreement

Please note that in the interest of time we are circulating these documents prior to complete review by G-P.  Accordingly, the attached agreements remain subject to further review and comment.

G-P plans to distribute an initial draft of the Human Resources Agreement and a Railroad Services Agreement next week.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Please also copy Tony Rothermel at trothermel@KSLAW.com.  Just you and I, and maybe one lawyer from each side, should schedule time next week for an initial Enron/GP video conference call review of the attached agreements and your draft of the contribution agreement.  After next weeks discussion and any resulting changes, we can convene a larger meeting with all the lawyers to work through the second versions of all agreements.  Thanks!

 - OPERATING AGREEMENT.DOC
 - BLACK LIQUOR EXCHANGE AGREEMENT.DOC
 - TALL OIL AGREEMENT.DOC
 - TURPENTINE AGREEMENT.DOC
 - WOOD FIBER SUPPLY AGREEMENT.DOC
 - LEAF RIVER SERVICES AGREEMENT.DOC
 - MATERIAL SPREADING AGREEMENT.DOC
 - PULP AGREEMENT.DOC


Richard, are you taking care of this?
----- Forwarded by Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000 09:42 AM -----

	Garrick Hill
	10/05/2000 11:42 AM

		 To: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, tmoore@llgm.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: tolling agreement for Tenaska 5 MW

My comments and changes are provided in the attached.

RH

---------------------- Forwarded by Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000 11:07
AM ---------------------------

Dan Lyons
10/05/2000 10:29 AM
To: Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: tmoore@llgm.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: tolling agreement for Tenaska 5 MW

Rick, it actually looks OK to me, but I forwarded it on to Richard Sanders
and you shoul probably get his input...

                                        Dan

	Garrick Hill
	10/04/2000 04:12 PM

		 To: Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, tmoore@llgm.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: tolling agreement for Tenaska 5 MW

Would you gentlemen be so kind as to look at this for conformity with the
previous amendments to the PPA dealing with the same issue?

Thanks -

RH

---------------------- Forwarded by Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT on 10/04/2000 04:11
PM ---------------------------

Carl Tricoli@ENRON
10/04/2000 03:41 PM
To: Garrick Hill/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chuck Ward
cc:
Subject: tolling agreement for Tenaska 5 MW

---------------------- Forwarded by Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron on 10/04/2000
03:45 PM ---------------------------

Hugh Lenox <hlenox@brazoselectric.com> on 10/04/2000 09:37:23 AM
To: "Carl J. Tricoli (E-mail)" <carl.tricoli@enron.com>
cc: "Philip Segrest (E-mail)" <psegrest@worldnet.att.net>

Subject: tolling agreement for Tenaska 5 MW

Carl:
attached is the revised second extension of the draft interim tolling
agreement for the 5 MW of incremental Tenaska capacity for your review and
approval.  Please send any edits to Philip Segrest (Brazos' attorney) and me.
Feel free to thanks
Hugh Lenox

 - tenaska tolling agrmt.doc


AGENT SH/SH BOOKING REF YZF4QO

                                          LAVORATO/JOHN
                                          LAVORATO/DINA
                                          LAVORATO/MICHAEL
  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  KIM HUMLICEK X 30681

  DATE:  JUL 09 2001

SERVICE               DATE  FROM           TO             DEPART  ARRIVE

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  12JUL HOUSTON TX     TORONTO ON     359P    814P
CO 1534    V          THU   G.BUSH INTERCO PEARSON INTL
                            TERMINAL C     TERMINAL 3
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         3:15 DURATION
                  AIRCRAFT: BOEING 737-500
                            SEATS 07D/07E/07F NO SMOKING CONFIRMED

CAR                   12JUL AVIS                   TORONTO ON
                      17JUL CONFIRMATION: 28236022US3
                            TELEPHONE: 905 676-1100...
                            STANDARD 4W-DRIVE AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: CAD62.00DY UNL .00KM 5DY BASE RATE
                            310.00 UNL
                            RATE GUARANTEED
                            PICK-UP: LESTER B PEARSON APO ETOBICOKE
                            CANADA
                            DROP-OFF: LESTER B PEARSON APO ETOBICOKE
                            CANADA
                            RESERVED FOR LAVORATO/JOHN

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  17JUL TORONTO ON     NEWARK NJ      1120A   107P
CO 3649    Q          TUE   PEARSON INTL   NEWARK INTL
                            TERMINAL 3     TERMINAL C
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         1:47 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
                  AIRCRAFT: EMBRAER RJ135/140/145
                            SEATS 04A/04B/04C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  17JUL NEWARK NJ      SAVANNAH GA    310P    532P
CO 3925    Q          TUE   NEWARK INTL    SAVANNAH INTL
                            TERMINAL C
                                                          NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:22 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
                  AIRCRAFT: EMBRAER RJ135/140/145
                            SEATS 05A/05B/05C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED

CAR                   17JUL AVIS                   SAVANNAH GA
                      22JUL CONFIRMATION: 28236051US4
                            TELEPHONE: 912 964-1781
                            FAX: 912 966-5176
                            STANDARD 4W-DRIVE AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD349.99WK 1000FM .29MI 5DY BASE RATE
                            349.99 1000FM
                            RATE GUARANTEED
                            PICK-UP: 442 AIRWAYS AVENUE  SAVANNAH 31408
                            DROP-OFF: 442 AIRWAYS AVENUE  SAVANNAH 31408
                            RESERVED FOR LAVORATO/JOHN

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  22JUL SAVANNAH GA    HOUSTON TX     655A    838A
CO 4265    Q          SUN   SAVANNAH INTL  G.BUSH INTERCO
                                           TERMINAL B
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:43 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
                  AIRCRAFT: EMBRAER RJ135/140/145
                            SEATS 05A/05B/05C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES  22JUL SAVANNAH GA    HOUSTON TX     605P    734P
CO 3925    Q          SUN   SAVANNAH INTL  G.BUSH INTERCO
                                           TERMINAL B
                            SNACK                         NON STOP
                            RESERVATION CONFIRMED         2:29 DURATION
                            FLIGHT OPERATED BY CONTINENTAL EXPRESS
                  AIRCRAFT: EMBRAER RJ135/140/145
                            SEATS 05A/06B/06C NO SMOKING CONFIRMED

RESERVATION NUMBER(S)  CO/U3S423

CO  FREQUENT FLYER COKY721702 LAVORATO/JOHN
***********************************************
ON-REFUNDABLE TKT MINIMUM $100.00 CHANGE FEE
***********************************************
                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

HEY.. LET ME KNOW ABOUT RETURN..........  TALK TO YOU...STEVE

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


Margo Reyna
Regulatory Analyst
Enron Corp., Government Affairs
Phone:  713-853-9191

----- Forwarded by Margo Reyna/NA/Enron on 12/05/2000 02:51 PM -----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	12/05/2000 10:09 AM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 123363@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Telecom Services: Broadband Services: FCC'S 5TH SET OF OPEN ACCESS
COMMENTS LOOKS FAMILIAR

FCC'S 5TH SET OF OPEN ACCESS COMMENTS LOOKS FAMILIAR

12/04/2000
Communications Daily
(c) Copyright 2000 Warren Communications News, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Familiar lines were drawn in comments on FCC's inquiry into broadband access
(00-185). "Four times in two years the Commission has investigated the
questions of whether or how it should regulate cable operators that offer
cable Internet services," AT&T began its filing, and many participants
appeared to have drawn liberally from their previous remarks. AT&T and
Comcast were joined by predictable group including Competition Policy
Institute and Information Technology Industry Council in opposing access
rules, citing growing competition from other broadband providers and existing
access agreements with ISPs. Consumer groups and OpenNet Coalition took other
side, questioning commitments cable has made so far. In war that has featured
creative semantics for years, CompTel rolled out new weapon, calling for
"minimum cable open access rules" that would require full unbundling of cable
transmission platforms for telecom as well as ISP service.
In filing that chided FCC for its inaction and "inadequate" step in ordering
inquiry rather than rulemaking, consumer groups led by Consumers Union asked
FCC to ignore recent federal court decision in Broward County, Fla., which
struck down local access ordinance. Groups said ruling was "fundamentally
flawed and does not bind the Commissions's First Amendment analysis. It is
not supported by law or fact, and unlikely to be adopted by other courts."
They said absence of open access has already allowed "harm" to set in as
corporate actors make business plans and cement technology decisions through
purchase and installation of equipment and infrastructure. Open access plans
that have been announced have "not occurred because the marketplace is
forcing that outcome," the groups said, but because various regulatory
agencies "have been involved in unnecessary and time-consuming proceedings
while the FCC remained on the sidelines."
Opponents of open access warned of consequences should FCC begin access
rulemaking. Comcast said rulemaking "would enmesh the Commission in
extraordinarily complex matters that would require years of rulemaking and a
mis-allocation of govt. resources that should be deployed in true
competition-enhancing efforts." AT&T said enhanced regulation of broadband
services isn't necessary because of competitive alternatives to cable
broadband, including DSL, wireless services and satellite services. It also
highlighted Canada's efforts to require open access to broadband cable, which
AT&T said have been "mired in complex proceedings ever since, and despite
these proceedings, Canada is no closer than is the United States to the
development of the arrangements required for multiple ISPs to access
customers over cable systems." Both operators celebrated cable's foray's into
open access. Noting its recent agreement with Juno, Comcast said it "expects
to forge business relationships with other Internet service providers, and is
already taking steps necessary to prepare for such developments."
Meanwhile, cable companies dismissed lightly USTA's petition to require them
to pay into telephone universal service fund on revenue from cable Internet
services. FCC "ought not to concern itself with the petition," Comcast said,
devoting less than page to topic in its 45-page filing. It said USTA's
petition is based on assessment that cable Internet is telecom service, which
is far from settled: "That, of course, is the open question." Even if cable
Internet is telecom, Comcast said, there would be "no universal service issue
that requires Commission clarification." It said FCC's policy has been not to
apply universal service requirements to ISPs that "self-provide" underlying
telecom service.
OPASTCO disagreed, saying requiring universal service contributions would "be
consistent with the Commission's commitment to competitive and technological
neutrality." It said allowing cable companies to escape contributing
increases burden on other industries. -- Terry Lane, Sasha Samberg-Champion

Folder Name: Telecom Services: Broadband Services
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 89

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

With apologies for delay caused by the Thanksgiving Turkey (which would not
be a force majeure), here they are.  Don't hesitate to call or email me if
there are errors or questions.

Regards.

Fritz.

(See attached file: Examples.doc)

 - Examples.doc


ok

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:14 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i am going home.  i have to.  if i wasn't going to dallas i would go.  sorry

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:13 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

or somewhere

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:13 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

no i'm going to finish this and ask fred if i can leave, walk with you, get in my car and go home.  :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:12 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

yep

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:12 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

come back to work?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:12 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

are you going to come back

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:11 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

can you wait about 20 minutes?  you are impatient.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:11 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ok how about now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:10 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i can't go.  i'll walk out with you though.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:10 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

ok, ready?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

maybe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:10 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

are you almost done

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i promise she does.  she said that she had to have a report to louise by the 7th

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:09 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no she doesnt, ready?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i can't.  i am not finished with this and she needs it by the weekend.  i won't get home until late.  what's so urgent?  cna't it wait another week?  i am so funny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

nope, lets go now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i don't think that i can go.  maybe next week.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i know, lets go

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 1:57 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

you lied.  fred is still here.


Please return signed 2000 Perfrmance Review sheets to me today or tomorrow.

Thank you,

Scott


Sorry to bug you, but I have one more.


Yates recently agreed (verbally to Brian) to the terms of the attached
sheet.  I do not know if or when they will sign an LOU; however, as we've
been doing with other customers in the interest of time, we would like to get
Yates a first draft of purchase and gathering documents as soon as possible.
Please call with any questions.  Thanks.

Dan

P.S.  F.Y.I., As you will see in this term sheet, Yates is installing their
own first stage of compression (screw) and wellhead gathering, similar to
Ind. Production.


As you know, I will be out of the office next week.  I will have the cell
phone with me:

   011 44 7881 512 535

but unfortunately no way to recharge the thing after Sunday morning and no
guarantee that it works in the Virgin Islands.  I suggest that if you try
that number and do not get an answer that you NOT leave a message there.  It
will be much more likely to get to me if you leave it here at the office
(x37459).

There will be a cell phone on the boat, however, and I will call my assistant
in Houston (Taffy - x57373) Monday morning with the number.


Dear Don,

Just wanted to let you know that the following items from your
order #9276038 have shipped and are on the way to your door:

item sku 40145298    qty :1  GONE IN 60 SECON DVD
*This item shipped on 11/29/2000

If you have any questions regarding this or any other order, please
feel free to contact us at any time by visiting customer support at
https://www.us.buy.com/corp/support.

We built buy.com with one thing in mind - enabling you and all our
customers to buy products better - that means offering you top brands,
superstore selection, low prices, and outstanding service.

Once again, thank you for your order. We look forward to earning your
business as we set out to be the "best place to buy on the Internet."

Sincerely,

Travis Fagan
Vice President, Customer Support

*****************************************************************

-If there are other items in your order that have not yet shipped,
 we will send you a confirmation email as soon as they do.

-Do not be concerned if items in your order arrive in separate
 packages. For quicker delivery, we ship from multiple warehouses
 throughout the country.

-You can track your order online at
 https://www.us.buy.com/corp/support/login.asp

******************************************************************
Please enjoy these offers from our partners:
******************************************************************

* Holiday gift values for everyone on your list!  Save up to 20%, or
  get free shipping and handling, and more - at many of your favorite
  merchants.  Only for Cardmembers.  Only at the Offer Zone.

   http://www.us.buy.com/clickfrom/shipping/amexconsumer1113.asp

* Get $10 Off when you shop for your home, from your office.

   http://www.us.buy.com/clickfrom/shippingconf/netgrocer.asp

* Get $100 off buy.com when you open an E*TRADE account!

   http://www.us.buy.com/clickfrom/neweacct/etrade_0801.asp