---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000 08:45
AM ---------------------------

knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/06/2000 07:59:13 AM
To: " - *Kinney, Doug" <dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
*jcasas2@enron.com." <jcasas2@enron.com>
cc: " - *Stiles, Marianne" <mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Porter,
Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Perrone, Brian"
<bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Herzog, Hans"
<hherzog@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Flewellyn, Melissa"
<mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Dalphon, Charles"
<cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: DPL REVISED OFO

DPL has just revised its OFO for the following days:

Tuesday March 7th - previous OFO volume was 943 dth, please deliver 763 dth
instead.

Wednesday March 8th - previous OFO volume was 863 dth, please deliver 743 dth
instead.

Chris Germany will be advised of this change via a spreadsheet sent by Herndon
at 9 am est.


Dear Craig Dean,

Thank you for participating in the http://www.sportingbetusa.com daily contest
Please find your entries below, keep this email for your records.

Your Contest Entry for 10.8.2001
---------------------------

Your Questions and Answers:
Question 1.   What will be the Total Points By The Rams?
Your Answer:  35_to_41

Question 2.   What will be the Total Number of Touchdowns By Marshall Faulk?
Your Answer:  1

Question 3.   What Will the Total Receptions By Isaac Bruce?
Your Answer:  6_or_7

Question 4.   Which of the Following Players Will Record The Most Points? ( Goals + Assists )
Your Answer:  Jeremy_Roenick

Tiebreaker.   Pick The Total Passing Yards BY Kurt Warner
Your Answer:  288

We wish you the best of luck with your entry.
If you have any questions or concern, please don't hesitate
to email us at contest@sportingbetusa.com.
Please note, once picked these choices are final,
they may not be changed.


Here is the draft as it was Wednesday.  The red-line is the changes to the
version supplied by Southern dated June 1.


Celeste,

I am writing to get some clarification on how the recent changes to the
program affect my eligibility for promotion.  At the end of last year you
informed me that I was not eligible for promotion to associate until the mid
year review (my 2 year anniversary).  It was my impression that the only
reason that I was held back from promotion into the associate program was
tenure.  Now, after reading the memo, it seems as if I will not be eligible
for promotion to associate until I complete 3 years in the program.

I am wondering if I am still eligible for promotion to associate during this
PRC?

Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.

Eric Bass
x3-0977


Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042606.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred: 104.00 / Final: 103.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TRADING_SC: PWRX
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 6 / Preferred:  46.69 / Final:  46.48)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


i don't know a subject yet


Stan,

Once again I appreciate the opportunity to talk with you and Dana about the
EOTT CFO spot.   I apologize for getting back to you so late last night.  My
wife and I had just left the hospital and were grabbing a late bite to eat.
I was thinking a little more about our discussion and wanted to offer a
couple of names to you that may or may not be popping up in your search:

        1) Ross Benavides-currently the CFO at Genesis
            2) Jim Diediker- former Controller at EOTT years ago.  Jim
pursued his Phd.
                at A&M and is now with AEP here locally.
            3) Ken Stockel-currently CFO at British Borneo here in town.
            4) Georgeanne Hodges- currently with Enron and could be
considered more
               at Laurie's level
I was fortunate to have all four of these folks work for me at Phibro so I
could vouch for each of them.  If you were interested in any of them feel
free to give me a call and I could give you some pros and cons relative to
your situation there.
Stan, I wish you well in finalizing your search.  All the best in turning
around the EOTT situation.

              Regards,

              Bob Flavin


Yes we do purchase un collected Judicial Judgments!!

If you, your company or an acquaintance have an Un collected Judicial   Judgments then please call us and find out how we can help you receive the money that the court states you are rightfully due.

We have strong interest in acquiring un collected Judicial Judgments in your City and Area.

J T C is the largest firm in the world specializing in the purchase and collection of Judicial Judgments.

Currently we are processing over 455 million dollars worth of Judgments in the United States alone.  We have associate offices in virtually every city in the US and in most foreign countries.

You have nothing to lose and everything to gain by calling.

There is absolutely no cost to you.

We can be reached Toll free at 1* 8 8 8* 2 4 8* 5 6 2 8

You can call 24 hours per day.

Thank you for your time

This ad is produced and sent out by U n i v e r s a l   A d  S y s t e m s
To be taken off our mailing list please email us at tammismith@freeze.com with take off in the subject line or call us toll free at 1* 8 8 8* 6 0 5* 2 4 8 5 and give us your email address.

Ebn 1st99

Yes we do purchase un collected Judicial Judgments!!


Please respond to Jennifer
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 12:06
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           01/26/2001 11:04 AM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Eloy Escobar Review

Are you going to do this? I am happy to--- I just need you to print the
forms--- i'll do it and we can jointly sign and keep everyone happy. IF it's
okay with you I am going to give him his numbers
JF


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001
03:57 PM ---------------------------

"Jeff Smith" <jsmith@austintx.com> on 02/21/2001 01:24:15 PM
To: <Phillip.K.Allen@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: leander and the Stage

Phillip,

I spoke with AMF's broker today, and they will be satisfied with the deal if
we can get the school to agree to limit the current land use restrictions to
the terms that are in the existing agreement.  They do not want the school
to come back at a later date for something different.  Doug Bell will meet
with a school official on Monday to see what their thoughts are about the
subject.  It would be hard for them to change the current agreement, but AMF
wants something in writing to that effect.  I spoke to AMF's attorney today,
and explained the situation.  They are OK with deal if AMF is satisfied.

AMF's broker said that they will be ready to submit their site plan after
the March 29 hearing.  We may close this deal in April.

The Stage is still on go.  An assumption package has been sent to the buyer,
and I have overnighted a copy of the contract and a description of the
details to Wayne McCoy.

I will be gone Thurs. and Fri. of this week.  I will be checking my
messages.

Jeff Smith
The Smith Company
2714 Bee Cave Road, Suite 100-D
Austin, Texas? 78746
512-732-0009
512-732-0010 fax
512-751-9728 mobile


Tana:

The project manager for the system we discussed earlier this week will be
Sheri Luong. She will be contacting you soon.

Scott


Please see the attached memorandum.


Please see attached memo from Beth Tilney.


---------------------- Forwarded by Shona Wilson/NA/Enron on 01/30/2001 12:39
PM ---------------------------

Doug Imrie@ECT
01/24/2001 11:06 AM
To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Indian Contracts

Please find attached a copy of the indian contracts report.

D


Akasha:
I would reword the first sentence as follows:

In response to your e-mail dated March 21st and based on all of the
information that we have received from you thus far which essentially has
only demonstrated that the debt of our Reference Entity's affiliates has been
repudiated, we still lack proof of the repudiation by our Reference Entity
(and the guarantor of such debt) of its obligations under the Guaranty that
supports such debt.  Please provide us such information to demonstrate that a
Credit Event has occurred.

I will be out of the office tomorrow but will be checking my voice mail.  If
you need to consult with someone right away, please contact Sara Shackleton
who is familiar with this deal.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Akasha R Bibb@ENRON
	03/22/2001 12:39 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Carol, can you check the note below.
Thanks
Akasha

In response to your email dated March 21st, you have not proven whereby the
guarantor( ie. the reference entity) has repudiated its obligations under the
guarantee for the obligations mentioned in the documents sent to us, in your
notice of Publicly Available Information..

We are still awaiting a copy of the Prospectus for the ISIN XS0109296011
US$22.4MM floating rate notes due 2000 and a copy of the guarantee.  Again,
we do not believe a Credit Event has yet ocurred.

Regards,


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 8:50 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE:  West Power Curve Shape

Right now in ZP26 there is very little demand and a lot of generation. Bob is expecting the demand to increase in 2002 for that area and generation will move along with it. His thinking is that prices will drop. The further you go out in time, he doesn't expect generation to keep as the demand continues to grow and so he is forecasting an increase in prices from around late 2005 out.

FYI, there are more changes coming to the reports. Tim was in Houston last week and John said he thinks the reports could be changed or improved. Tim wants to see certain changes and get rid of some reports that John had told you he wanted to see when we made the changes about a month ago. I told Tim that I am not doing anything until he talks to John about it and they both agree. I hate to say it but it is becoming somewhat comical these reports. So just a heads up that some changes we make may come back to the East as well.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 8:23 AM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	RE:  West Power Curve Shape

What was it?

stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Postlethwaite, John
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE:  West Power Curve Shape

Yeah, about 2 weeks ago.

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 7:21 AM
To:	Postlethwaite, John
Subject:	FW:  West Power Curve Shape

Did you ever get an answer for Frank?

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:34 PM
To:	Postlethwaite, John; White, Stacey W.
Subject:	 West Power Curve Shape

Below are two pictures that may create a questions, the most obvious being why is calendar ZP26 bonkers?  Does it really deserve that backwardation? Any feedback would be great..

Thanks,
Frank

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>


Ross -

Have we signed a confidentiality agreement with Cargill?  I need to know for purposes of completing the letter for you.

Also, just so that we can keep track of the status of these matters, could you please request a letter from either me or Tana and we will prepare them.  This will enable use to keep files of the agreements and know what is going on.  It will also make the timing for initialing and signing faster as I will not have to review the agreements prior to initialiing them.

Thanks.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Mesquita, Ross
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:32 PM
To: Greenberg, Mark
Cc: Bridges, Michael
Subject: FW: Cargill letter

Mark,

Attached is a channel letter from PwC for Cargill.  It is the same letter that we used with them for Koch, except for the meeting date deadline has changed.  Please review and initial so that we can execute.

Thanks
Ross

-----Original Message-----
From: philip.greedy@us.pwcglobal.com
[mailto:philip.greedy@us.pwcglobal.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 5:52 PM
To: Bridges, Michael
Cc: patricia.guzman@us.pwcglobal.com; Mesquita, Ross
Subject: Cargill letter

Mike and Ross, here is a letter for Cargill. It's the same letter we have
used, except I changed the date to 11/30/2001 to contact them.
(See attached file: EOLletteragreement-Cargill-11-5-01.doc)

Thanks
Phil Greedy
713-356-5223

"Bridges, Michael" <Michael.Bridges@ENRON.com> on 10/23/2001 12:14:41 PM
To:   Patricia Guzman/US/MCS/PwC, Philip Greedy/US/MCS/PwC
cc:   "Mesquita, Ross" <Ross.Mesquita@ENRON.com>
Subject:  Potential Partners

I spoke with a few people in our organization.  As I feared, we have
already spoke with Oracle and Siebel.  That said, we are interested in
exploring other companies that you may have stong relationships with.
One company name that came up was Novell.

Thanks for the names, I am confident that we will find something.

Mike Bridges

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


The article below describes two separate paths that EPA is considering for
regulating MTBE.  They are also considering action on a request from the
state of California to grant its request for an oxygenate waiver through
regulatory means.  Taken in conjunction with the increased interest on
Capitol Hill for moving oxygenate waiver or MTBE phase out legislation, the
future does not look very bright for MTBE.

We will continue to pursue on Capitol Hill our Enron-developed approach which
proposes stranded cost recovery and liability protection for US MTBE
producers. The House and Senate will be moving forward with hearings and
legislation shortly, and we will keep you posted on our efforts and other
developments.

********

E&E Newsline
Feb. 24,2000
Volume II, Issue 18

--------------------------------
1. AIR POLLUTION/WATER POLLUTION
--------------------------------

EPA FLOATS TWO PROPOSALS AFFECTING MTBE, REFORMULATED GASOLINE

     The Environmental Protection Agency has advanced proposals dealing
with the touchy issues of methyl tertiary butyl ether regulation and with
the reformulated gasoline program to the White House Office of Management
and Budget, and although the two proposals are being kept under wraps they
have already spurred controversy and debate.

     Both items were forwarded to OMB Feb. 15 and both will appear in
the Federal Register probably after 90 days of OMB review, the standard
time allotted for such proposals.

     With neither proposal having been made public, speculation abounds
about both.

     The first item -- which is being reviewed by OMB as an advanced
notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) -- aims to control MTBE, a synthetic
"oxygenate" added to gasoline to lower emissions of air pollutants. The
Clean Air Act mandates that certain urban areas with high levels of air
pollution contain 2 percent-by-weight level of oxygenates in their gasoline
in order to reduce emissions of ozone-forming hydrocarbons and carbon
monoxide. To comply with this reformulated gas (RFG) mandate, MTBE is
relied on for over 80 percent of the gasoline, ethanol is used in almost 15
percent, and other oxygenates make up for the remaining amount.

     Although MTBE has been heralded for its role in reducing air
emissions, it is under attack because of environmental contamination,
particularly to groundwater. In fact, both the Senate and House have plans
to move legislation to allow states to waive the oxygenate mandate, and
California has requested a waiver from the RFG requirements, an issue that
could induce other states that have problems with MTBE contamination to
take similar action.

     Now, however, EPA appears poised to take action of its own.
According to sources, the EPA plan would seek to control MTBE under the
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA provides EPA the authority to prohibit
certain chemicals or substances if the agency concludes it "presents or
will present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment."

     "MTBE clearly meets this test," claimed Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-
Calif.), who has in the past fought to have MTBE phased out.

     However, Terry Wigglesworth, executive director of the Oxygenated
Fuels Association, which represents MTBE producers, argued otherwise. "TSCA
is not a good technical choice," she said of EPA's proposal. Among the
hurdles EPA will face with the proposal, she predicted, is that under TSCA,
EPA must look at the risks to human health and the environment, "but there
are enormous air quality benefits due to MTBE use, for example there have
been significant reductions in ozone and air toxic emissions, such as
benzene."

     "Also under TSCA, EPA must determine if the risk could be reduced
by other federal laws already being administered," she explained, pointing
specifically to the underground storage tank program, which she said has
not been complied with too well.

     In a Feb. 22 letter to EPA Administrator Carol Browner, Boxer said,
"Some critics of this approach argue that MTBE contamination may be
controlled by upgrading our underground storage tanks. This won't solve the
MTBE problem, however, because we now know that even those new tanks leak."
She also said, "MTBE poses a more pervasive water contamination problem
than the other harmful constituents of gasoline like benzene because it
moves through water faster, farther and persists longer than those
constituents."

     Whether EPA's proposal would entail banning, phasing out or capping
MTBE use is unclear and was disputed among various sources. However, one
industry source said that EPA was not taking a stance on that issue and
would first take public comment through the ANPR and proposed rule.

     Although sources indicated that the ANPR would not typically be
printed in the Federal Register until the 90-day review period has expired,
"We heard EPA asked OMB to fast track it," one industry source said. And a
federal government source also hinted that the proposal would be reviewed
very quickly.

     The second proposal is shrouded in even more ambiguity. What is
certain is that the proposal would entail an "adjustment" to RFG, as stated
by an OMB source.

     Environmental and industry sources said that the hints they've
gotten indicate that the proposal entails an offset for carbon monoxide.
According to these sources, EPA has discussed this option with stakeholders
in the past.

     Under the proposal, certain RFG provisions concerning emissions of
volatile organic compounds would be loosened as long as there were
significant reductions in CO emissions. VOCs are blamed for ozone
production, and carbon monoxide also contributes to ozone.

     According to an environmentalist, this proposal would encourage
increased reliance on ethanol by refineries.

     Wigglesworth spoke against this proposal, saying, "Any loosening of
requirements to maintain actual air quality benefits that we've achieved
through cleaner burning gasoline that would turn back the clock on cleaner
air or air quality would be unacceptable."


It's ok to increase.  I spoke with Kate about it.  Increase your Emporia
volumes.

	From:  Joann Collins @ ENRON                           01/31/2000 12:07 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 2/00 Suburban increase

chris, i think this is the deal you were asking about.  in order for this to
flow i would need
---------------------- Forwarded by Joann Collins/Corp/Enron on 01/31/2000
12:05 PM ---------------------------

mstiles@columbiaenergygroup.com on 01/31/2000 11:04:11 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: 2/00 Suburban increase

Effective, 2/1 we need to increase Suburban (67-1) 99 dth per day.   I will
now
need a total of 150 dth per day.   Please advise of a contract number when it
is available.   Thanks.


Eric,

The name I have at El Paso is Tim Bourne 713-420-3826.  Todd Geiger is my
contact over there.  He's a Vice President and told me that Tim runs the
trading group and would not be in the office until Mon. next week.

Fletch


Start Date: 3/6/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030610.txt


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/03/2000 05:37
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
12/03/2000 05:32 PM
To: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tosha Henderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carl
Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: GenPower term sheet

Here's the draft term sheet for GenPower.

Please holler if you have any comments.

Kay


Want you to speak from 10:15 - 11:00
** Will be sending a letter this week (3/19/97)

Flew to Austin on company plane


Attached are the September 1st volume requirements for CES/New Power.  Please
advise if you know of anyone that should be added to the distribution, or if
you would like to be removed from the distribution.

David
713-345-7692


How was cottage country?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cowan, Mike
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 1:16 PM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE:

Hey,

Just got back from some time off.  Congrats on the house.  Where did you buy?  When are you coming up?  I'll let you know all the details of the offsite as soon as we know - it should be a good time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dorland, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:13 AM
To:	Cowan, Mike
Subject:

What are the details of this offsite? Make sure to count me in. Bought a house this weekend. No sense wasting any time. I'll call you later.

Chris


Due to the flooding, electrical and communications problems in Houston over
the weekend, several Enron Information Technology systems experienced
outages.  At this time all critical systems have been restored and should be
operational.

In the process of restoring service, several user and common data directories
had to be restored from the backup tapes from Thursday evening.  Therefore,
some of you may be missing data files on your H drive or M drive that you
created or modified on Friday.

If you have any questions or have any IT related problems, please contact the
Resolution Center at x31411 for assistance.


FYI-
We need to be more careful with which of the two curves above we use for
physical deals.  We have had some substantial OA for Jan 01 production
because the basis curves for these two locations were .30 different.  Usually
these are less than .05 different.  If you have a physical mich physical it
should be Mich_cg-gd in tagg(which is michigan consolidated pipe in sitara),
if it is consumers power, it will be mich/cons and cec pipe in sitara.  Any
questions, ask.  Thanks.
PL


o Report: Crosspoint Forgoes $1 Billion New Fund

NEW YORK -- Crosspoint Venture Partners has commitments
for a new $1 billion fund but has decided not to
raise the capital, according to a report in the
Wall Street Journal. The reason for the delay is
the difficult environment for investing in new companies
and generating high returns. Crosspoint will raise
the fund as soon as the environment improves, according
to the report. Crosspoint raised an $850 million
fund earlier this year.
http://www.cpvp.com/
_____________________________________________

o Mineral and Metal Marketplace Gets Funding from Votorantim

LOS ANGELES -- Quadrem, an online marketplace for
mining, minerals, and metals, said that Votorantim
Venture Capital, the venture arm of industrial giant
Votorantim Group of Brazil, has become a founding
shareholder of Quadrem. Other founding shareholders
of include Alcan Aluminium Limited, Alcoa, Anglo
American, Barrick Gold, BHP, Corporacion Nacional
del Cobre de Chile (CODELCO), Companhia Vale do
Rio Doce (CVRD), De Beers Consolidated Mines, Imerys,
Inco Limited, Newmont Mining, Noranda. Normandy
Mining, Pechiney, Phelps Dodge , Rio Tinto, WMC
Limited, and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter.
http://www.quadrem.com/

_________________________________________

o Crosslink Capital Makes Add-ons but No New Investments in Q3

SAN FRANCISCO -- Crosslink Capital said that it
made no new investments in the third quarter of
2000. The firm said this was the first time this
happened since the fourth quarter of 1996. Crosslink
did commit additional capital to existing portfolio
companies in the third quarter. The firm invested
in Brightmail, a provider of anti-spam software;
NonStop Solutions, which develops chain automation
software; Protocare, a healthcare services company;
and techies.com, which provides Web-based IT recruiting
services. The firm said it is evaluating potential
investments in software, Internet infrastructure,
and communications integrated circuits companies.
Crosslink Capital has more $800 million under management.
http://www.crosslinkcapital.com/
_____________________________________________

EnergyWorkspace in alliance with VerticalNet
HOUSTON, Nov. 29 (LocalBusiness.com) -- EnergyWorkspace, a developer of
online business software for the oil and gas industry, has formed an alliance
with a huge Pennsylvania business-to-business company to co-brand their
products.
EnergyWorkspace said the deal with VerticalNet Markets, a unit of VerticalNet
Inc. (Nasdaq: VERT), of Horsham, Pa., will give its users greater information
reach through that company's two energy portals.
VerticalNet operates 55 industry-specific online communities, including one
for oil and gas interests and another for the hydrocarbon industry.
Mark Beatty, president and chief executive officer of Houston-based
EnergyWorkspace, said in a release the alliance will aid his customers and it
also will "introduce our unique business process support system to thousands
of potential clients across a range of energy companies."
Both companies commented on how well the two fit each other's needs, stopping
just short of mentioning a possible merger. Jerry Alwais, a spokesman for
EnergyWorkspace, told LocalBusiness.com that he does not know terms of the
deal and has not heard anything about a merger. Officials at each company
were not available for futher comment.
The once high-flying VerticalNet, whose stock traded as high as $148.38 last
spring, opened today at a 52-week low of $10.50.
Joseph Galli, chief executive officer and president of VerticalNet, earlier
said his company was looking to make strategic acquisitions. He made the
announcement at the same time the company said it lost a whopping $121.9
million through the first nine months of the year, compared with a loss of
$38.2 million for the period a year earlier.
Since EnergyWorkspace is privately held, it doesn't report on its financial
picture.

___________________________________________

o Broadband Access Firm Allegro Gets $24 Million First Round

SAN JOSE, Calif. -- Allegro Networks, which is developing
a wholesale broadband access platform, said it has
secured $24 million in its first round of funding
from Bessemer Venture Partners, Columbia Capital,
and Infinity Capital.  The company said it will
use the funds to develop its technology. Allegro
Networks said it named P.J. Singh as its chief technical
officer and acting CEO. Mr. Singh co-founded Packet
Engines.
http://www.allegronetworks.com/

_______________________________________________

o ASP United Messaging Closes Third Round with $70 Million

WEST CHESTER, Pa. -- United Messaging, an enterprise
messaging service provider, said it closed a $70
million third round of financing led by Broadview
Capital Partners. New investors First Union Capital
Partners, Comcast Interactive Capital, and Brinson
Partners, and previous investors Internet Capital
Group, Oak Investment Partners, Infinity Capital,
and Labrador Ventures participated in the round
as well. United Messaging is a global application
service provider that offers hosted messaging and
professional services. The company said it will
use the funding to expand service platforms in the
U.S. and abroad, to support the launch and promotion
of its existing and upcoming messaging technologies
and services, and to open new sales offices in Europe
and Asia. Broadview and First Union will each receive
a seat on United Messaging's board of directors.
http://www.unitedmessaging.com/
_____________________________________________

o ID Management Firm Courion Gets $13.2 Million in Round Two

FRAMINGHAM, Mass. -- Courion, which develops self-service
identity management  software, said it secured $13.2
million in its second round of funding led by QuestMark
Partners. Other investors include Riggs Capital
and previous investors JMI Equity and Massachusetts
Technology Development. The company will use the
funds to add new products, and to expand into Internet
commerce and international markets.
http://www.courion.com/
_____________________________________________

o Performance Management Firm Wily Has $10 Million Round Two

BURLINGAME, Calif. -- Wily Technology, a provider
of performance management software for Java Web
applications, said it raised $10 million in its
second round of funding. Previous investors Greylock
Management and BEA Systems participated along with
new investor Accel Partners. The company will use
the funds to expand its Web application management
product portfolio, and for sales and marketing.
http://www.wilytech.com/
_____________________________________________


Check out this story.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyer, Mitch
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 1:58 PM
To:	Miller, Paul; Tuttle, Bruce
Subject:	FW: Fw: FW: Breaking News

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Gesell, Tom A" <TAGesell@midamerican.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 1:37 PM
To:	Dutler, Jane M; Dutler, Jane M; Meyer, Mitch; Scott McCoig (E-mail); Wally Piepho (E-mail); Semin, Frank
Subject:	FW: Fw: FW: Breaking News

>
>
> >> University of Kansas Football Practice Delayed
> >> Kansas City Star
> >> October 29, 2001
> >>
> >> The University of Kansas Jayhawks' afternoon football practice was
> >> delayed
> >> on Monday for nearly two hours at Memorial Stadium. One of the
> >> players,
> >> while on his way to the field happened to look down and notice a
> >> suspicious looking, unknown white powdery substance on the practice
> >> field. Head coach Terry Allen immediately suspended practice while
> >> the Kansas Bureau of Investigation & FBI were called in to
> >> investigate. After a complete field analysis, the FBI determined that
> >> the white substance unknown to the players was the goal line.
> >> Practice was resumed when FBI Special Agents decided that the team
> >> was not likely to encounter the substance again.
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Dec. 26, 2000
          Teco Tap  30.000 / Enron ; 120.000 / HPL Gas Daily

          LSP HPL Katy I/C    30.000 / Enron


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude17.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas17.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil17.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded17.pdf

Feb. WTI/Brent Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/clg-qog.pdf
Feb Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack.pdf
Feb Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack.pdf
Feb Gas/Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hug-hog.pdf
June Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUM-HOM.pdf
March Gas/Heat Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUH-HOH.pdf
Feb/May Unlead Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/HUG-HUK.pdf
Feb/July Crude oil Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/CLG-CLN.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG17.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG17.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL17.pdf


The purpose of this memo is to provide a one page summary of the various
e-mails  you have already received regarding changes to trading limits since
the last regularly scheduled BOD meeting on 12/7 through the last Executive
Committee of the BOD meeting on 12/21.  The following limits are in effect
with anticipated changes  highlighted in red.  Of course these could again
change given market conditions, and Ted/Rick and Skilling may decide to
re-allocate some or all of the $17MM of Discretionary VaR on 1/6/01.

Trading Days: 12/7/00 - 12/27/00 12/28/00 - 12/31/00 1/1/01 - 1/05/01  1/6/01
forward

VaR Limits:

EES NA  $7MM   $7MM   $7MM  $5MM

NA Gas  $110MM  $70MM   $70MM  $60MM

UK Power  $20.3MM  $20.3MM  $18.95MM $13.95MM

Agg Enron  $140MM  $100MM  $100MM $83MM

Unallocated
Discretionary VaR    $0MM   $0MM   $0MM  $17MM

NOP limits with scheduled changes in temporary limits:

UK Power  68 Twh   68 Twh   59.5 Twh 59.5 Twh

European Gas 260 Bcf   260 Bcf   60 Bcf  60 Bcf

Regards,
Cassandra.


Diane, would you please send Valeria the recent (positive) article on PRC?  Thanks.  Michelle


thanks!!  I have them

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Attached, please find a transcript from Governor Davis' press conference
yesterday during which he announced the signing of SBX 5 and ABX 29.
The press conference dealt with a variety of issues.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_htmldisplay.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@
1424090196.0987090193@@@@&BV_EngineID=falkikghjlebemfcfkmchcng.0&sCatTitle=Pre
ss+Release&sFilePath=/govsite/press_release/2001_04/20010411_transcript_of_SB5
x_AB29x_bill_signing.html&sTitle=GOVERNOR+GRAY+DAVIS+SIGNS+LANDMARK+ENERGY+CON
SERVATION+PACKAGE%0aAPRIL+11,+2001%0a&iOID=14336


For the short Thanksgiving week of  November 20th-November 22th:

Transwestern weekly average deliveries to California were 941 MMcf/d (86% -
due to pipeline maintenance) while east deliveries averaged 310 MMcf/d.  San
Juan lateral throughput averaged 789 MMcf/d while receipts from Rio Puerco
averaged 27 MMcf/d.

El Paso average deliveries to California were 2,491 MMcf/d (85%) :
- PG&ETop (capacity 1,140 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 495 MMcf/d (70%)
- SoCalEhr (capacity 1,250 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 1,102 MMcf/d (88%)
- SoCalTop (capacity 549 MMcf/d) deliveries averaged 521 MMcf/d (97%)

Other pipeline throughput to California:
- PGT ( capacity 1,901 MMcf/d) throughput to California averaged 1,627 MMc/d
(86%).
-  Kern River (total pipeline capacity 700) throughput to California averaged
225 MMcf/d (32%). The remaining 475 MMcf/d  (68%) is assumed delivered to the
Las Vegas market.

The cash PG&E/Topock - SoCal/Needles spread went from  $.80 Monday spread to
to a $1.23 Wednesday level.

Daily Cash prices were absolutely wild this week at the southern California
border.  Monday's cash price of $13.42 went to $17.35 by Wednesday.  San Juan
and Permian cash prices each had some increase and by Wednesday were  $6.32
and $6.40, respectively.  This price spike occurred despite the fact that
total California sendout (sum of interstate gas, intrastate production &
storage withdrawals) decreased from last week's 7.6 BCF/day level to this
week's level of 7.2 BCF/day.

 Wednesday Enron Online Basis financial spread numbers:

  Dec  Dec 00-March '01 April-Oct '01
Perm-CA   5.42       2.83      1.2
SJ - CA    5.55   2.96      1.52
SJ-Waha   .11    .12      .32
Perm-Waha   .02    .005      .07


NPWLAX
URGENT - WEATHER MESSAGE
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE LOS ANGELES/OXNARD CA
714 PM PDT MON JUN 11 2001

...STRONG WINDS TONIGHT FOR PARTS OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY...

.STRONG NORTHWEST WINDS HAVE DEVELOPED THIS EVENING ACROSS THE
MOUNTAINS AND SOUTH COAST AREAS OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY. AREAS MOST
SUSCEPTIBLE TO THE STRONG WINDS WILL BE THROUGH AND BELOW CANYONS
AND PASSES...WHERE SPEEDS COULD GUST OVER 45 MPH. MAJOR HIGHWAYS
THAT WILL BE IMPACTED INCLUDE 101 AND 154. WINDS WILL SUBSIDE LATE
TONIGHT AS THE PRESSURE GRADIENT RELAXES.

CAZ039-052-120515-
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SOUTH COAST-
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY MOUNTAINS-

...WIND ADVISORY UNTIL 300 AM PDT TUESDAY...

FOR NORTH TO NORTHWEST WINDS 25 TO 35 MPH WITH LOCAL GUSTS OVER 45
MPH.

ALL MOTORISTS SHOULD USE CAUTION WHILE TRAVELING IN THE ADVISORY
AREA...ESPECIALLY THOSE WITH HIGH PROFILE VEHICLES AND VEHICLES TOWING
TRAILERS.  BE PREPARED FOR SUDDEN STRONG CROSS WINDS.

$$

SOME WIND REPORTS AS OF 7 PM...

GAVIOTA PASS...............GUSTING TO 45 MPH.
EL CAPITAN BEACH...........SUSTAINED 20 MPH GUSTING TO 24 MPH.

MOYER

NNNN

[LAXNPWLAX/992311983]

EDIS-06-11-01 1913 PDT

---------------------------------------------------------
To update or terminate your subscription to this email service
visit our webpage at http://www.incident.com/edismail.html.

EDIS is operated by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services,
State of California. This email relay is offered by incident.com
as a public service. Because of the complexity of this system and
its dependence on other systems, we cannot be responsible for
delays or failures in transmission.
---------------------------------------------------------


Guys, I would like to schedule a quarterly meeting to review our technical
risk as a part of this reporting procedure.  Wayne can you set up a meeting
for the four of us over the next few weeks.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000
10:49 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Tammy R Shepperd                           08/03/2000 02:07 PM

To: Wayne Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert P
Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Pruett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Charles
Vetters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron, Kyle Kitagawa/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Charles Ward/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike Mazowita/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christopher A
Helfrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Neyman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesus
Melendrez/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Technical Risk Reports

Attached are first drafts of reports for Dave Delainey that detail assets
that may or may not pose a technical risk for ENA. The current draft was
developed with input from Wayne Mays, Mark Dobler and Andrea Reed.

I would be most appreciative if each of you would review these reports at
your earliest convenience and respond back with your comments/updates.
Please note:   In the Technical book dated 8/03 there are 2 tabs - Risk and
No risk.

Dave has asked for this report to be updated monthly for inclusion in a
reporting package for ENA's Office of the Chair.  After we are satisfied that
this is the proper format and is all inclusive I will communicate a process
for monthly updates.

Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Tammy Shepperd
x36589


Wow! thanks,
m


FYI, Sara

Lin - please put on SFA file - thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 17/08/2000 13:35
---------------------------

Jon Barrett@MGLTD
07/08/2000 11:34
To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FX Transactions

---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on
07/08/2000 11:31 ---------------------------

GILBERGD@sullcrom.com on 06/08/2000 15:45:55
To: jbarrett
cc: RAISLERK@sullcrom.com

Subject: FX Transactions

eSafe Protect Gateway (tm) has scanned this mail for viruses, vandals and
suspicious attachments and has found it to be CLEAN.

File: 62cy01!.DOC (38,400 bytes)
Encoding: Base64
Result: Clean.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attached is a draft of the memo we discussed on the proposed FX business.
Please call or e-mail with any questions.  Best regards.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - 62cy01!.DOC


I would suggest that we start reporting Capital Deployed and Funds Flow
numbers in these reports as well
as the Wholesale Group will need to take the lead in managing both.

John
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Moore, Mary Kay
Sent: 11 June 2001 22:48
To: Aiken, Buddy; Allen, Melissa; Brown, Michael - COO London; Evans,
Stephen; Hiersche, Rich; Neocleous, Katerina; O'regan, Niamh; Sherriff, John;
Wood, Stephen
Cc: Killen, Faith
Subject: Frevert Report Published - June 11th
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential


??? Dear Vince:
?
??? I have put together a list of  finance working papers (some of which I
brought to the interview last wednesday)  which I have written since 1995
mostly in support of my work but also (at least  initially) as a learning
tool. Several of them, however,?do contain  innovations.
???
??? I have asked Ms. De Claris to  forward a copy to you.
?
??? As I expressed to you earlier I  am particularly interested in Enron
Credit Swaps trading platform and the  business opportunities that it will
spawn.
?
??? I also think that there are  tremendous opportunities to be explored in
the secondary mortgage maket in the  US. I do not know if Enron has
considered or is active in this market. This  would be an area that I am also
very interested and in which I think much better  can be done than most of
the players in the street.
?
??? The question in my mind  (hopefully not prematurely)?is: If there is
interest here would Enron  consider letting me put together this business?
?
??? I look forward to hearing from  you soon.
?
??? Best regards
?
??? Joao
?
???


Sevil,

Please, make sure you provide this information ASAP.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001
12:35 PM ---------------------------

Margaret Daffin
04/25/2001 12:04 PM
To: Sevil Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Norma Villarreal/Enron@EnronXGate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ramona
Perkins/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: HIB Visa Application - Sevil Yaman

Sevil:  please let me know when you will be sending me the information for
your HIB visa?
Thanks
Margaret

---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Daffin/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001
12:03 PM ---------------------------

Margaret Daffin
04/10/2001 04:04 PM
To: Sevil Yaman/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Norma Villarreal/Enron@EnronXGate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ramona
Perkins/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: HIB Visa Application - Sevil Yaman

Sevil:  In order that we may proceed with your request for Permanent
Residency, our immigration attorneys have advised us that we need to process
the HIB visa, prior to the Permanent Residency application.

Therefore, I am attaching an HIB visa questionnaire that I would like you to
complete and return to me, together with copies of all of the documents
listed at the bottom of the form.

Please bring these to me in 3AC2026A.

Please let me know if you have any questions at x55083.

Thank you

Margaret


Joni forwarded my note on to Jo Williams but I haven't heard any more than that.

Thanks,

Raetta

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 12:11 PM
To:	Zadow, Raetta
Subject:	FW: Marketer for Post Rock Gas

	Raetta, did you ever get a response on this?  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zadow, Raetta
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:15 PM
To:	Bollinger, Joni; Zadow, Raetta
Cc:	Dietz, Rick; Blair, Lynn
Subject:	Marketer for Post Rock Gas

Joni, I was wondering if you could find out for me who the Marketer is for Post Rock Gas.  The reason I would like to know is they are the last hold-out shipper as far as signing their extension agreement so that we can send them their Rate Case Refund invoices which are dated September 1, 1999.  I would like to see if a Marketer could call them to see if we could get them to sign so that we could finally get the last of these invoices sent out and cleared from our accounts receivable account.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks,

Raetta


Hello Matt Motley,

In this issue:

- Feature: IRF - Our Favorite Power Semi
- General Electric agrees to purchase EnronWind's wind turbine
manufacturing unit and marketing operation for US$400 million in
cash and assumed debt.
- Ballard announces it will work on combustion engine generators with
Ford Power Products.
- Fairchild Semiconductor increases 1Q02 Revenue Outlook due to
stronger bookings in the first seven weeks of 2002.

To download this report Click here <http://www.reedwasden.com/members/download.asp?ID=131&email=matt.motley@enron.com>.
If a link does not appear above please copy the url between the '[' and ']' below and paste it into your browser.
[ http://www.reedwasden.com/members/download.asp?ID=131&email=matt.motley@enron.com ]
Please make sure that your email address is at the end of the url.

Thank you,
The Weekly Team

As always, we welcome any feedback on our research including questions and opinions.
To be removed from this mailing, click here <http://www.reedwasden.com/unsubscribe.asp?email=matt.motley@enron.com&pubid=3> or reply to this email with 'UNSUBSCRIBE-Weekly' in the subject field.


We don't report this info separate.  I am afraid it will lead to alot more questions.   I would prefer system average.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moore, Jan
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:20 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: ETS  - Investor Questions

Tracy:

Talked with Kim Watson.  This is how she suggested we answer Investor Question 3:

	       West Market - 95% throughput utilization against contracted-for capacity for September YTD
	       East Market -  67% throughput utilization against contracted-for capacity for September YTD

The West and East are two separate markets for TW.  The majority of TW's business is the West market.
The East market offers our shippers more flexibility.  The two percentages should stand alone and not be
combined.

Kim felt like these needted to be separate as they are two distinct markets

Thanks!  Hope you have a good weekend and don't get any calls from the office.

Jan
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 6:03 PM
To:	Keiser, John; Gilbert, Steve; Moore, Jan
Subject:	FW: ETS  - Investor Questions
Importance:	High

see question #3

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:31 PM
To:	Kilmer III, Robert; Miller, Mary Kay; Neppl, Ray; Geaccone, Tracy
Cc:	Mayeux, Gay
Subject:	FW: ETS  - Investor Questions
Importance:	High

Mary Kay, Ray and Rob:  Can you 3 help her out on 1 & 2?
Tracy:   Please handle 3.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mayeux, Gay
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:15 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	ETS  - Investor Questions
Importance:	High

We have some investors who are interested in knowing more about the pipes.  Can you please tell me who can anwser/confirm the following:

1.  Per the latest rate cases the nominal ROE's and related capital structures are as follows:

	ROE				12.89%	12.18%	13.49%
	Equity Ratio(equity to debt)	60%	60%	42%

2. Is rate base calculated on equity or assets?

3. What was the percentage of capacity for each of the pipes for the first nine months of this year?

It would be very helpful if you or someone could respond this afternoon.

Thanks!

_________________________
Gay Mayeux
Vice President, Investor Relations
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 4931a
Houston, Texas 77002

Phone:  713-853-9905
Cell:      713-416-8821
Fax:      713-646-3002
email:    gay.mayeux@enron.com


This is yet another, tangible case of why price caps don't and can't help;
they can and will only make matters worse.  Caps are a policy chainsaw when a
scalpel is needed.  The result of the caps being imposed on QFs by Davis and
the Legislature will be shut downs and bankruptcy, which will reduce supply
and decrease reliability----the exact opposite of what the state needs to be
doing.

FYI:  I listened in to Sokol's conference call yesterday re: court case
freeing CalEnergy from the QF contract.  Sokol blasted Edison over and over
(e.g., accumulated war chest of over $2 billion in cash).  Sokol said that,
at least for the time being, this lessens the need for CalEnergy specifically
to force an involuntary.  Be interesting to see if other QFs take similar
tack.  Sokol also said that CalEnergy has sold the power to El Paso---lot's
of press questions about price and where the power's headed (i.e., in our out
of state).   He said he expects to get a "market price" from El Paso and that
if the "prices are higher out of state, well......."

Best,
Jeff

	James D Steffes
	03/22/2001 10:16 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: California Update 3/22/01

FYI.

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/22/2001 10:16 AM -----

	Kristin Walsh/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/22/2001 08:20 AM

		 To: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Claudio Ribeiro/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Tawney/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott
Tholan/ENRON@enronXgate, Britt Whitman/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: California Update 3/22/01

? The legislature will meet and vote to repeal Section 390 of AB 1890.  This
will reverse what the QFs get  paid from natural gas costs and replace it
with the formula in the governor's current plan - 7.9 cents/kwh for 5-year
contracts and 6.9 cents/kwh for 10-year  contracts.  According to sources,
this is "locked in to pass."  It  will be implemented by a PUC order on
Monday.

? The QFs met on this plan all day yesterday and have calculated what they
would get paid.   This  plan would not generate enough money for many QFs to
operate profitably.  At  least 2,000 MW of the total 5,407 MW of gas-fired
QFs would be unable to generate  a positive cash flow and would have to
either operate unprofitably or shut down.

? The QF community is responding with an increased militancy for an
involuntary filing, according to sources.  The most aggressive QF after Coram
Energy is David Sokol and Walter Scott of Mid-America Energy (based in
Nebraska).  Sokol is described  by sources as "extremely aggressive."

? An involuntary bankruptcy filing appears imminent.   Sources believes the
trigger event will either be the legislative passage of the plan  tomorrow or
the PUC order implementing the plan on Monday.


Start Date: 3/16/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001031606.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/16/01
  TIE_POINT: MEAD_2_WALC
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DVPLV
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


-----Original Message-----
From: Tyler.Hearon@nyc.rabobank.com
[mailto:Tyler.Hearon@nyc.rabobank.com]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 9:19 AM
To: clintc@rocketball.com; johnston_nicholas@jpmorgan.com;
Rpaddock@Hotmail.Com; Espinosa_Miguel@Gsb.Stanford.Edu; Grimes@Ncwd.Net;
Cmcwhert@Bankunited.Com; Andrews@Calpine.Com; Ed_Solari@Enron.Com;
Wexler@Pdq.Net; Warren_Prescott@Hotmail.Com; Bryan.Kimzey@Csfb.Com;
mark@junell.cc; bavousej@tklaw.com
Subject: RE: Many thanks to Miquel

Excellent time! Look forward to keeping it going at the wedding, Elizabeth
will be so impressed. Speaking of keeping it going, our good friend, Mr.
Kimzey, called me last night drunk as rodeo goat at about 10 PM asking me to
go out and party a little bit more. Did I miss something or did we not get
our share this weekend?

Apparently the weekend only caused Bryan to reflect on his current state of
affairs. By chance it was just the welts on his forehead from crushing cans
that caused him to start boozing all by his lonesome yesterday. Or perhaps
he just wanted to enjoy the perks of first class. Let's hope it was the
latter and had nothing to do with the frightful prospect of being a married
man in just 6 weeks.

Oh, by the way, I can assure you all Kimzey has not read a single one of
these emails yet, and likely won't till about noon. Damn slackers over there
at CSFB!

-----Original Message-----
From: Clint Cobb [mailto:clintc@rocketball.com]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 9:57 AM
To: 'Nicholas Johnston-Advisory'; Rpaddock@Hotmail.Com;
Espinosa_Miguel@Gsb.Stanford.Edu; Grimes@Ncwd.Net;
Tyler.Hearon@Nyc.Rabobank.Com; Cmcwhert@Bankunited.Com;
Andrews@Calpine.Com; Ed_Solari@Enron.Com; Wexler@Pdq.Net;
Warren_Prescott@Hotmail.Com; Bryan.Kimzey@Csfb.Com; mark@junell.cc; 'Jim
Bavouset'
Subject: RE: Many thanks to Miquel

I lost the camera - hopefully you're referring to the silver one in the blue
case? - thanks L.B.!  I had a great time as well, and I still have the
shakes to prove it.

Clint Cobb
4116 Law St.
Houston, TX  77005

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Johnston-Advisory [mailto:johnston_nicholas@jpmorgan.com]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 6:46 AM
To: Rpaddock@Hotmail.Com; Espinosa_Miguel@Gsb.Stanford.Edu;
Jbavouse@Bpl.Com; Clintc@Rocketball.Com; Grimes@Ncwd.Net;
Tyler.Hearon@Nyc.Rabobank.Com; Cmcwhert@Bankunited.Com;
Andrews@Calpine.Com; Ed_Solari@Enron.Com; Wexler@Pdq.Net;
Brian.Jinks@Bus.Utexas.Edu; Bmartin@Texas.Net;
Warren_Prescott@Hotmail.Com; Bryan.Kimzey@Csfb.Com; mark@junell.cc
Subject: Many thanks to Miquel

Great weekend - thanks to Miquel for getting us all there and hopefully
Kimzey
will now not miss the wonders of bachelorhood too much.

Found a camera - digital one in 317 - also have the elvis sun glasses - if
the
rightful owner would like to step forward - and yes we know who you are.

Cheers
Nick

This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not intended
as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial
instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, its
subsidiaries and affiliates.

==================================================================
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
==================================================================
The information contained in this message may be confidential
and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.

==================================================================


When Bill Miller calls to sell megawatts for a minimum price,   make sure
that you follow up with an adjustment bid to ensure that fixed price.
If you are confused on whether to adjust or not,  ask him well before the
deadline to adjust bid.

We had some confusion on this issue on Friday.    If you have any questions
on this issue let me know.

JMF


We may be creating another problem.

I'll have Heather set up a meeting for next week.

thanks

bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Bob M Hall/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001 11:34 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.  From:  Rita Wynne @ ECT                           03/29/2001 11:05 AM

To:	Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:	New Profit Centers

Bob,

Per our conversation -  on this past Tuesday, a group met from VM, Gas Acctg. and East Risk to discuss the recording of the 12 east desks and 7 central desks to SAP. Effective with March flow, each desks for Central and East will record to its own profit center in SAP (the wellhead desks and Texas were done in Feb.'s g/l).  According to Gas Acct., they will calculate UA for each of the profit centers (19 in total).  As we discussed, VM does not have the appropriate Unify reports or manpower to  support this level of accounting at this time and for this month will continue to tie UA4 out as we have in the past using our same reports - Gas Acct. will have to sum their side of the UA4 calc. to match us.  With the foresight of eventually going to profit center level accouting and reporting, there will need to be significant changes to our current back end systems and processes to handle this lower level of reporting.  I believe the flash is already being done at the different profit centers, but all the downstream groups are still performing their analysis at a more consolidated level.  There were discussions in the meeting that OA would not go to this lower level, but I am of the opinion that we all need to be consistent in our analysis and reporting across the organization - so if this is the path we take, then everyone's process will need to be able to handle this level of detail.  Of course, no decisions were made in our meeting, and as I stated, for now, VM's process will remain unchanged for this month.  Please let me know if you want to discuss further.  Thanks!


Fine with me.

Regards,

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:01 AM
To:	McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond
Subject:	FW: Notes from Enron
Importance:	High

The following representations (among others) have been made to various parties in due diligence relative to both the credit agreement (with the banks) and the Preferred Stock Agreement (Dynegy) to the Boards of Transwestern (TW), Northern (NNG) and Enron Transportation Services (ETSC) and it subsidiaries, as well as to Dynegy and the banks:

The funds that are being loaned out of NNG and TW to various entities and the further loans of these funds to Enron will carry Enron Corp guaranties.
The note agreements will reimburse NNG, TW and ETSC and their subsidiaries for their actual expenses associated with these endeavors.
The credit agreements actually require a large degree of separateness and an arm's length standard needs to be applied to dealings between ETSC and its subsidiaries and Enron and the rest of it's subsidiaries.

Before the funding under the credit agreement takes place I would like to make sure that you two are aware of this, have agreed to and understand the conditions and further agree that you will assist me in cleaning up whatever documentation needs to be cleaned up between Enron and ETSC and it's subs to make the above representations not be false.

Rod Hayslett
Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Enron Transportation Services Company
EB4054
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX  77002-7361
713-853-6178
rod.hayslett@enron.com


Looks like Tom forgot this deal on Friday - I've just entered it. Deal # is
514006. One thing I didn't check on was whether it was off-peak or on-peak.
Does this deal check out with APB? Let me know.

Thanks,
kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/05/2001 07:37 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb checkout

have you found out anything on this trade?

thanks

Kerri Thompson
02/02/2001 04:48 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: apb checkout

she says tom, i guess we can wait until monday.....

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/02/2001 04:38 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: apb checkout

I don't see any deals with any of these terms in Tom's trade log for today.
He's left the office, and I've left him a message on his cell phone - but
until then, I can't really say if this is good or not. Could it be a Mark
Fischer deal?

Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/02/2001 02:26 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb checkout

missing deal for tom

buy bp energy
25 mw
217.50
march
palo verde

thanks


Name           : Susan Scott
E-mail         : sscott5@enron.com
Title          : Analyst
Phone          : 3-1455
Location       : EB3276c
Last 4 of SSN  : 1734
Nationality    : UNKNOWN
Business Unit  : Risk Management, Gas Trading, Financial Books
Company        : ENA
CO or GL       : 413
RC or CC       : 1839
Rotation Start : 3/28/00
Rotation End   : ? - 3/28/01
Supervisor     : Dutch Quigley
Languages      :


Look forward to participating.  Is there an agenda for the offsite?  I was
wanting to determine if any of my key team members may be invited to attend
certain segments due to areas of interest and/or making contacts across Enron.

Thank you
Meredith


FYI, the attached PGE filing makes mention of two complaints filed with the
CPUC seeking collection of unpaid PX credits.  Peggy, if the press tracks
these complaints down, you may get several press inquiries tomorrow.
Jeff, can we figure out who filed  the other complaint?
Please forward as appropriate.
---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES on 02/14/2001 06:37
PM ---------------------------
From: Michael Tribolet@ENRON on 02/14/2001 07:04 PM
To: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
jklauber@llgm.com, mday@gmssr.com, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate@EES,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: PG&E SEC Filing

Per your request, please see the attached.

	Mike D Smith@EES
	02/14/2001 05:37 PM

		 To: Michael Tribolet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, mday@gmssr.com, James
D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, jklauber@llgm.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: PG&E SEC Filing

Please see the bold language in the article below about PG&E's recent SEC
filing.  Sounds like our "negative CTC's."

Michael--do you have a copy of that SEC filing?  MDS

NEW YORK (Reuters) - PG&E Corp.(NYSE:PCG - news), embattled parent of Pacific
Gas & Electric Co., said on Wednesday it is examining a restructuring of its
bank loans and commercial paper, and that bank lenders on a $1 billion
revolving credit facility to its California electric utility unit won't act
upon that unit's previously announced default until March 6.
San Francisco-based PG&E made the disclosures in a filing late Wednesday with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (news - web sites) (SEC). The utility
had about $1 billion in cash as of Tuesday, PG&E said.
A similar bank deadline affecting credit lines of Southern California Edison
(news - web sites), that state's No. 2 utility and a unit of Rosemead,
Calif.-based Edison International(NYSE:EIX - news), was to expire on Tuesday.
PG&E also said in its filing that as of Monday, Pacific G&E, California's No.
1 utility, may not have paid as much as $433 million of ``energy credits'' to
customers who have chosen to buy their electric energy from a provider other
than Pacific G&E. The utility is required under state regulations to offer
the credits, it said.
Pacific G&E and SoCal Edison have been unable to recover about $12 billion
because of a rate freeze imposed under California's 1996 utility deregulation
law, which has left them unable to pass on their soaring wholesale power
costs to consumers.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	LUNCH WITH JENN!

Date:		5/25/2001
Time:		12:00 PM - 1:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


>From: "Maggie Beery" <m_beery@hotmail.com>
>To: aeh6375@hbu.edu, allisonspeed@hotmail.com, amy.clemons@enron.com,
>andrea_sorelle@hotmail.com, aria_brown@hotmail.com, battlecj@hotmail.com,
>Callie.Beery@kornferry.com, christina@gulfcoastentertainment.com,
>c_c_krebs@hotmail.com, christylederer@hotmail.com, cwunz@comscore.com,
>Derek_Davis@Dell.com, elizabethfenoglio@hotmail.com,
>emilycbrock@hotmail.com, Jill_Dalovisio@was.bm.com, jwunz@ncta.com,
>Kate.Delaney@lyondell.com, kawise@hotmail.com, kim.davidson@nbc.com,
>lyles65@hotmail.com, marcyrinehart@hotmail.com, mcgeeat@hotmail.com,
>me_levy@hotmail.com, mike.sewell@mail.house.gov, mmalone@loomissayles.com,
>mpincoffs@nada.org, nancy.c.hutcheson@bakerbotts.com,
>PDelaney@USChamber.com, rbeery@argohouston.com, rbeery@houstonisd.org,
>rencarey@aol.com, sarah.bass@gs.com, sneumeister@yahoo.com,
>BWare@rnchq.org, crosenth@central.uh.edu, ellie.bullard@mail.house.gov,
>janderson@rnchq.org, jsimons4@mindspring.com, kmcfall@ssk.com,
>mmcmullen@promarketdc.com, mollyradcliffe@hotmail.com
>Subject: Fwd: RV: Pull!
>Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 14:47:12
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - ATT195947.htm
 - squirrell.mpeg


Here is the latest, with comments from everyone.  MDS


Here is your HR/SAP/Personal Number: P00503900.

Thanks Tjae


Attached is the requested information

Please let me know if you need addtional info.

thanks

bob


OPEN IN PRIVATE... THEN RUN LIKE HELL.......

OPEN IN PRIVATE
OPEN IN PRIVATE

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Hamble [mailto:rwhamble@ee.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 9:22 PM
To: Randy Thompson; Lindroos, Rob; Karl Schmidt; Charles Trenton Storch;
Brian Pepper; brett spencer
Subject: Fw: I found a pic of your mom on the internet!

Open with discretion....

----- Original Message -----
From: Robert  <mailto:rzarbaugh@worldnet.att.net> Zarbaugh
To: Rich  <mailto:rwhamble@ee.net> Hamble ; Dave
<mailto:wrenchfedx@aol.com> Smith ; D  <mailto:wdooooo@aol.com> Kendrick ;
Chris Pepper <mailto:bwpepper@megsinet.net>  ; Bill Martin
<mailto:bmartin@roava.net>  ; Aaron M Pauley <mailto:Eblamp@aol.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 9:12 PM
Subject: I found a pic of your mom on the internet!

 - Hitchhiker.jpg


Take pity on a poor group of first semester MBA students and please fill
out our survey!

I promise it won't take long and it may help you vent your frustrations
about a previous employer...

Due to the wonders of the internet you can just point and click (along
with a few fill-in-the-blanks).

Just follow the link below.

URL : http://www.inetsurvey.com/Survey.cgi/raoanil/Attrition

Thanks for your help - we couldn't do it without you!!!

Anil, Jaya, Karen & Pat


Consumer Price Index

From: Sandi M Braband on 10/16/2000 12:14 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Rate for Tenaska Deal

Daren,
Thanks--while I'm certain I should know, I must confess that i do not know
what CPI stands for???

Sandi

	Daren J Farmer
	10/16/2000 11:39 AM

		 To: Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Rate for Tenaska Deal

Sandi,

Sorry for just now getting back with you.  I was out last week.

The rate ($.04/mmbtu) will be charged on the greater of the volumes nominated
on the supply contracts or the actual deliveries to the plant.  The fee will
be adjusted yearly based on CPI.

Bob - I could not remember if we stated the type of settlement on the
delivered volumes (actuals or nominations).  I think we should use actuals
due to possibility that the plant could over pull with out our knowledge on a
daily basis.  We would receive the estimates/actuals on a lag and may have to
purchase gas to offset the imbalance, even though the plant kept the noms at
the 45,000 base.  I also think that if the plant does increase the nom, they
are more likely to pull the additional volume rather than pulling less.  Do
you agree with this?

D

From: Sandi M Braband on 10/10/2000 03:41 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rate for  Tenaska Deal

Daren,
When we met regarding the rate for the Tenaska Gas Management Agreement, you
guys mentioned that it would be tied to an index--could you restate for me
how that is to work--it will start out 4 cents per MMBTU based on the greater
of the volumes nominated through the supply contracts or the actual
deliveries to the plant. Then the fee will vary month to month? year to year?
based on what index?

Thanks,
Sandi


This request has been pending your approval for  117 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000041547&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000041547
Request Create Date : 6/19/01 7:50:30 AM
Requested For       : jaime.gualy@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\nahoutrd\houston\pwr\common\power2\Region - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


-----Original Message-----
From: Perry, Warren
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:26 AM
To: Green, Tracey
Subject: FW: Married Man Left Work

Morning Tracey! Somebody sent this to me, and I thought it was so funny!

-----Original Message-----
From: Blackshear, Regina
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:48 AM
To: Ebow, Amber; lanetia yarbrough (E-mail); Latonya Carter (E-mail);
loneta edison (E-mail); rhonda jordan (E-mail); rosalind hicks (E-mail);
rosemary reynolds (E-mail); val blackshear (E-mail); Yvonne Acosta
(E-mail); Perry, Warren; Puckett, Eve; Barnett, Angela; Hernandez, Judy;
Di Giacomo, Angela; Broussard, Tharsilla; Smith, George D.; Tending,
Leslie
Subject: FW: Married Man Left Work

Subject: a married man left work

A married man left  work early on Friday afternoon. in stead of going
home, however, he  squandered the weekend and his paycheck partying
with the boys. When he  finally returned home on Sunday night, he ran
into a furious  wife.

After a couple of hours of nagging and berating, his wife asked,  how
would you like it if you didn't see me for a couple  days?!!!!

"That would suit me just fine!!!"

So Monday went by,  and the man didn't see his wife. Tuesday and
Wednesday came and went with the  same result. Come Thursday, the
swelling went down a bit and he could see her  a little, just out of
the corner of his left  eye....


Carie Robert (pronounced Robear) X33522 does floor tours for visitors

---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
01:26 PM ---------------------------
From: Cary M Carrabine@ENRON on 01/24/2001 11:11 AM
To: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: T J Aruffo in Houston

FYI.   We need to get back to Doug as soon as possible.  This should be a
good
opportunity to meet his new boss.

----- Forwarded by Cary M Carrabine/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001 10:51 AM -----

	"Walker, R. Douglas" <rdwalker@nisource.com>
	01/24/2001 09:06 AM

		 To: "Cary Carrabine (E-mail)" <ccarrab@ect.enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: T J Aruffo in Houston

As we discussed, my new boss, TJ Aruffo is interested in a tour of Enron's
Houston Trade Floor.  He is available the morning of the 1st.  He is flying
out of Intercontinental at 2:45 PM.  As far as I know he will be travelling
alone.  He  has not requested my presence yet.

The purpose of his visit is to see first-hand a world-class energy trade
floor and to begin networking with key industry personnel.  He is new to
this side of the business.  His previous role was NiSource CIO; so he comes
into his new position with a systems and process oriented view.   His
responsibilities at NiSource encompass the regulated gas supply management
and gas control operations of eight of NiSource's gas utilities (two are
primarily managed by EnergyUSA-TPC - NIFL and Kokomo).  He is responsible
for Bay State (and Northern Utilities), NIPSCO, and the Columbia
Distribution Companies (five LDC's).  We are currently fragmented in
Massachusetts, Columbus and Indiana and are in the process of evaluating how
to bring this together, functionally, locationally, or not at all.  TJ
reports to Pat Mulchay, who is President of the Merchant Energy Division.
Pat reports directly to Gary Neale, our CEO.

TJ's previous background includes a stint at Fidelity Investments, so a
trade floor is not new to him.

Please confirm Enron's address and if you don't mind, recommend a hotel that
is convenient.  Let me know who will be meeting TJ then we can  turn the
details of finalizing the arrangements over to TJ and your designee.  Thanks
for your help.

 - C.DTF


Attached is the final version of the Standstill Agreement that Larry Witalis
and I have been working on. As has been discussed, the Standstill Period
would be until June 20th, the LCs would be extended until June 29th and the
draw condition re 20 day expiry would be deleted.

Please review the attached and let me know if this would be OK to execute
tomorrow and send to PG&E for signature.

Bill -  please confirm the amounts of the LCs.

Thanks
Elizabeth
713 853 6349


I understand there was a problem on my desk this week with a market that was
posted and executed on by one of our traders. I was not in the office and a
decision was made for the trade to stand.

I apologize if there was a lack of professionalism at this end. We do a lot of
business with Enron and  I am interested in keeping a working business
relationship.

Please include me in any discrepancies with our real-time traders and their
accounts: pplhourly(1-8).

A small deal,as I see it you owe us a jab...and I won't be asking for any
favors any time soon.

thanks

jeff lambert
hourly trading manager
PPL EnergyPlus

jclambert@pplweb.com
(610)774-4337


Thinking about bailing out of the big O for a couple of days w/o rugrats or
Sandra. Taking Kari out of her native biome is more hassle than its worth
these days.  Might just blow up for a long weekend and do some fishing and
beer drinking.  Send me the name of that book on flyfishing in the Hills--I
want to see if I can get it on Amazon.   AMFDJF


We were allocated a total of 7591 mmbtu at the receipt point for November.  I
think our contract for November is at the average of the Inside FERC
postings for the three pipes plus a penny.  Those prices are as follows:

Transco Zone 3  $4.51
Florida Zone 3    $4.45
Sonat                      $4.47
Avg                        $4.4767  +  0.01 = $4.4867

The same transport fee and fuel percentage as last month should be deducted
from this price.  I think the allocated fuel was 23 mmbtu.

Also, keep in mind that we scheduled 31,112 mmbtu per Rebel's directions.
ENA will have to cash out the difference with Destin (at higher prices!).

Thanks,

Susan Pereira

Stevens_Hollister@eott.com on 12/07/2000 02:05:57 PM
To: Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
cc: Jeananne_Heck@eott.com
Subject: Prices and volumes

Susan,

Do you have any idea when we will receive volumes and pricing for the Bazor
Ridge Gas Plant for November?  If I need to contact someone else concerning
these issues please let me know.

Thanks,

Stevens


what time do you think

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

you're going to be done before I can get off

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:04 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i think now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:05 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I don't know...when are you getting your haircut?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:03 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

so i have to go get my haircut, any ideas where we can meet


Hi everyone,

Hope you're having a nice Thanksgiving break. Just a friendly reminder on the following (again, if you plan to attend, please respond to me directly and indicate which evening):

Fellow Evening Haasians,

Who are these so called account managers, Rich, Jenny and Mark? What do they do? How can we leverage off their expertise and they, ours? Do they have specific company
contacts? Where can they be found? Will the ubiquitous pizza be served to entice you to attend? Strong possibility. Will I have to sign up on Bear Tracks? No. How can attending benefit me? It's up to you.

To answer these questions and many more, we will be scheduling during -

Mon, Nov. 26 during the break (i.e., 7:30 - 8:15) in C125 and
Thu, Dec. 6 during the break as well in the Career Center Conference Room (S420)

an informational session with the account managers.

Here's a description that Rich Wong, the financial services account manager prepared:

"The Haas Career Center staff includes 3 account managers that
can be a valuable resource to those that are exploring job or career
direction changes. Their role is to be the primary liaison for recruiters
in their specific industry sectors, being the one-stop shop point person
for companies interested in connecting with Haas MBA students.  They
cover a full spectrum of responsibilities from the logistics of setting up
presentations and interviews to establishing contacts and providing
strategic guidance to recruiters (including both hiring managers as well
as University Recruiting reps within human resource departments).
Through this activity, they gain insights into their company/industry
focus that they are happy to share with Haas students, John Morel,
and the other career advisors in the Haas Career Center."

Feel free to contact them regarding questions on companies and industries
that they represent.  Conversely, please provide them with any valuable
contacts that you have in current/former employers that might help them aid your
schoolmates to find employment opportunities. They are located in the Recruitment Center
(S330 by the ATM machine) and their contact information is as follows:

Mark Friedfeld - Financial Services (Investment and Commercial Banking, Real
Estate, Venture Capital)
friedfel@haas.berkeley.edu/510-642-6588

Jenny Rowe - Consulting, Consumer Products, Healthcare/Biotech/Medical
Devices, Educations, Not-for-Profit
rowe@haas.berkeley.edu/510-643-4212

Rich Wong - Technology, Entertainment - rwong@haas.berkeley.edu/510-643-4211

If you plan to attend, please respond to me directly and indicate which evening.

Best regards, Albert Demery
demery@haas.berkeley.edu


How did you like the counter-party?
Ben


570011 - Prebon said it's their deal
570023 - broker was changed to Prebon
570801 - I'm waiting until after the calc to change del.point to NP
570473 - waiting for calc to add .005 broker fee
570444 - waiting for calc to add .005 broker fee
569957 - changed in CAPS but not Enpower - waiting for calc

Sorry about all those unfinished ones, but Risk started calcing a while
before I got your e-mail, and they're still going. I'll let you know when
these deals have been corrected.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/04/2001 02:58 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 4/4 Checkout

PREBON WEST

Chris Mallory
deal 570011
Prebon does not recognize

deal 570023
Broker should be Prebon not APB

deal 570801
location s/b NP not SP

AMEREX WEST
All deals are fine.

BLOOMBERG

DEAL 570473
bloomberg shows fee of .005

deal 570444
bloomberg shows fee of .005

deal 569957
Bloomberg shows cp as Allegheny Energy and we show Duke Energy
P.S. if this did should be Duke the correct entity should be Duke Power, a
division.......not Duke Energy Marketing..


I created deal 602030 under Cleco.

D

Mary Poorman@ENRON
02/01/2001 07:20 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter 986315 for 10/00

I don't know if they paid Torch, I would assume so, as this is October.
According to Charlene, Cleco is invoicing us for this deal.  Intially, there
was no deal in the system at all.


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEPENO>
To: Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com <??SJoe.Stepenovitch@enron.com>
Date: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:26:11 GMT
Subject:

Your message has been relayed
to the following recipient(s):

tbertges@mrportland.com
Message relayed

The message was successfully delivered to 1 recipient(s)
at domain mrportland.com.

 - C.DTF
 - C.DTF


Attached is a new version including Jim and Amr's comments.

Regarding Jim's questions, the open possibility of the utility acting as Provider of last resort (POLR) means, in fact, that the utility may still be in the merchant function, but only as a back up provider (when the alternative supplier fails to provide the service or departs the area), with a very limited scope. Note that I am talking about the POLR and not of Default Provider (the supplier of those customers who choose not to choose) as defined in the paper "The role of the Default Provider in Restructuring Energy Markets".

This means I would allow the utility to be POLR (which means a very limited merchant function) but not be Default Provider (which means a larger merchant role). Anyway, I think perhaps would be more realistic to allow the utility to keep a larger merchant function for residential customers, specially when few suppliers are willing to enter that market. I was told that in Georgia (the ideal "theorical" model) there are only 4 marketers still competing.

If you want to follow this approach, the message should be: The incumbent utility should be outside the merchant function except, for residential customers and, possibly, as a Provider of Last Resort of the remaining customers.

As it is written, I did not include the residential as exemption.
I think "pricing the utility out of the merchant function" (I guess you mean force it to charge high prices or to afford high costs without pass through) is not as good alternative as getting the utility out of the merchant function, since the last is easier to justify and makes more certain that all customers must choose an alternative supplier. As suggested by Jim I am including again the wording related to Order 636 that explains the reasons to limit the merchant function. I also included some wording related to pricing for the POLR.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:19 PM
To:	Canovas, Guillermo
Cc:	Frank, Robert; Kingerski, Harry; Levy, Alberto; Ibrahim, Amr
Subject:	RE: Disco of the future

Here are some thoughts from me.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Canovas, Guillermo
Sent:	Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:38 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Frank, Robert; Kingerski, Harry; Levy, Alberto; Ibrahim, Amr
Subject:	Disco of the future

Jim,
Attached is the note to CAEM related to the "Disco of the future" paper. It includes comments of the team.
I will be in a course Monday and Tuesday but I will connect at night. You can leave me a message at 703.549.6080 room 434.
Regards,
Guille

 << File: n-distco future3.doc >>


Ms. Jones,

I was not aware that the agreement was not executed.  I have forwarded this
message on to our VP Business Development for review.

If you do not hear from anyone in the next few days, please do not hesitate
to contact me.

Regards,

Rodney A. Faragalla
VP of Operations
The Island ECN, Inc.
50 Broad Street, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Phone (212) 231-5032
Fax (212) 487-2983

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana Jones [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 10:22 AM
To: rodney@island.com
Cc: John Pavetto
Subject: Island ECN Inc. Confidentiality Agreement

Mr. Faragalla,

I am checking on your review of the Confdientiality Agreement referenced in
our
earlier email below.   When might we expect to hear some comments from you?
Please let me know.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 09:19 AM -----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Tana Jones   |
|        |                       |
|        |          07/12/2000   |
|        |          05:18 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
  |
|
  |       To:     rodney@island.com
|
  |       cc:     Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron
|
  |       Subject:     Island ECN Inc. Confidentiality Agreement
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

Please find attached a copy of the referenced Confidentiality Agreement.
Please
call me at (713) 853-3399 if you have any comments or questions.  If the
agreement meets with your approval, please have an authorizied officer of
the
company execute it and return the signed document to me at the fax number
below.
Thanks for your attention herewith.

(See attached file: islandECN.doc)

Tana Jones
Paralegal
Ph:  (713) 853-3399
Fax:  (713) 646-3490


They don't have the exclusive line (brand new) boat for our week but they do
have this one.  If you can get in the night before we can actually stay on
the boat and leave early in the morning - effectively getting an extra day of
sailing.  If you want to check it out online, their website is
www.moorings.com and the boat is a 463.  There's some good stuff on the site
for people who've never been before - Bill might find it comforting.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 09:40 AM -----

	GJKLOSS@mooringsnet.com
	02/23/2001 09:13 AM

		 To: mark.taylor@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: 02/23/01 - Moorings Quotation 588986 (1 Pages)

See Attached File

 - report.rtf


Attached is PIRA's extended Daily Demand Report.

Please contact Morris Greenberg and Victoria Watkins for more information
regarding these reports at [mailto:morris@pira.com] and
[mailto:vwatkins@pira.com], respectively. For distribution requests, contact
John Graziano at [mailto:jgraziano@pira.com]. We can all be reached at (212)
686-6808.

 - ed042501.pdf
 - ed042501.xls


FYI, Ken we may want you to speak to Peevey and Freeman.  I believe that
discussion should frame the proposal and attempt to set up a meeting with his
staff and advisors to answer questions about credit and documentation.  In
the propsal, we have tried to frame the potential credit and legal holes in
their RFP with our suggested language or documents.  It would be helpful for
the commercial team in ENA/EES to meet with these gentlemen and their
advisors to describe the proposal and perhaps move towards negotiating a
transaction.

 The proposal includes:
  a) traded power products of various sizes and terms;
  b) unit contigent tolls from Pastoria (750MW) and Las Vegas Cogen (222MW)
for term;
  c) natural gas packages for size for one through five year terms to provide
gas hedges for their QF portfolio or other contracted merchant toll contracts;
  and d) an preliminary proposal on DSM from EES.

I will forward an executive summary from Chris Calger with more detail.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
06:56 PM ---------------------------

Dale Rasmussen
02/06/2001 05:51 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CDWR Response

The final copy of the Response to RFB (California Department of Water
Resources) is attached.  We are sending the document by fax and overnight
delivery shortly.

The missing Exhibits are in hard-copy form and will be included in the
overnight delivery package.


Tanya,

Thanks for the info.  I'll amend the P&G status to include physical only
until we hear something that makes us more comfortable trading financially.

Walter

To: Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: ClickPaper approvals, 12-19-00

We may want to rethink allowing P&G to trade on Clickpaper for financial
business.  We have been trying to negotiate an ISDA with P&G for well over a
year, to no avail.  While they are a great credit, they have issues with our
no reliance clause in our documents which is a HUGE legal issue and they were
involved in a large derivative lawsuit with Bankers Trust several years ago.
This may be one for legal to decide, but my vote is against until there is an
ISDA to confirm trades under.

Thanks,
Tanya

Walter Guidroz@ENRON
12/19/2000 08:46 AM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Noel Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Walter
Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: ClickPaper approvals, 12-19-00

Attached are ClickPaper approvals for December 19, 2000.  Please call if you
have any questions; thanks.

Walter


Can you please shut this counterparty down for weather.  Thanks!


Chris -
Would you mind e-mailing Evelyn your contact information at the APX? And I
can't recall whether or not we wanted to confirm these trades. Let me know
when you get a chance, and I'll take care of it with the Confirms group.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/30/2001 03:02 PM
---------------------------

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/30/2001 03:01 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Automated Power Exchange

Kate, have we started using this brokerage firm yet.  If so, do you have any
phone numbers to contact them?  Also, do you know how we are going to confirm
their trades?

Thanks


Yesterday, Fred Ni from the FERC called with some questions regarding the TW
options filing.  Most all of his questions centered around the determination
of the highest value.
 Bottom of page 7, last paragragh, we say Shipper call options will be
awarded upon the highest rate payable for the  option component.
 Then in the bullets that follow we say, based on the criteria known in
advance-  I told him that we would post the   elements and it would determine
the highest value.
 Then in the next paragraph we say again sold in a bidding process to only
those parties that place the highest value  on the option.
 Then on the actual tariff sheet, 98 we refer to in  33 c) method of awarding
options, ?? being is the highest value
 Then on tariff sheet 157, in the Option Fee section he felt we should refer
to the elements that make up the highest   value; volume , rate and term
As you can tell, this all centers around the elements of determining the
highest bid,  I advised him that it included rate, volume and term that the
option call was for.   We need to clarify these in writing as soon as
possible.  I told him we would do so in our answer to interventions.  He said
the sooner the better.  We also need to add expriation date on tariff sheet
98 c as to items included in the posting, since it could be different than
the exercise date.

I'd say all in all this is good that this is his only concern and that he
called before any protests etc.  He said he like the filing-  but was just
confused on what we meant by awarding to the highest value.

Susan, I assume you will be drafting the answer, although at this point I
haven't seen any protests, let's try to have the answer filed Friday or
Monday at the latest.    Please call if questions-  MK


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000 01:58
PM ---------------------------

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 06/27/2000 01:21:08 PM
To: "'cgerman@enron.com'" <cgerman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Chris,

I'll assume that Natural Choice deal we discussed a couple of weeks ago is a
no-go.  Columbia Energy Svcs still hasn't executed its contract.

Here's a little ditty my sister sent me.  (You need sound.)

ii
 <<Chinese thing.exe (Compressed)>>

 - Chinese thing.exe