> Dr. Mr. Lay,
>
> I apologize for the "cold call" by e-mail, but this appears to be the
> easiest way to contact you, given communications from Mexico, where I am
> currently working and living.  We did meet some years ago at a conference
> in Houston when I was a VP of Union Gas, Ontario, Canada, which was later
> bought by Westcoast Energy and to which I migrated.
>
> I served as Vice President, International, of Westcoast Energy Inc. for 5
> years after Union Gas.  A year ago I elected to form my own consulting
> company when Westcoast constricted its international program in Asia, my
> prime area of interest at that time, to fund Alliance and their Mexican
> projects.  I remain on very good terms with Westcoast and have since done
> considerable work in Mexico for them.  Our Asia work was a real success,
> and we built the first Canadian power plant in China, and acquired and
> expanded a $550 MM US power plant in Indonesia.   Both are business and
> technical successes, and both were developed and built under my
> leadership.
>
> My current 8 month consulting assignment here in Mexico City for a large
> multi-national joint venture wraps up this month, and I am now seeking
> other employment. We would be happy to stay in Latin America/Caribbean, go
> back on the Asia beat, or try another geographical location.  My
> preference is contract work, full or part time, although I would consider
> full time permanent employment.  I thought perhaps Enron might have
> opportunities for someone with my experience and talents.
>
My interests are primarily business development.  Although an engineer by
training, I have been in the business and operations side for the last 20
years.  My main area has been natural resources and energy.  I also enjoy
strategy work, and apparently am good at it, judging by the results from the
international plan I did as the first ever VP, International at Westcoast
Energy.

> One item of note regarding project feasibility - while I ran Westcoast
> Energy's Asia business development and operations, we invested (with
> partners) over $600 MM US in five years with a total staff of 5 (including
> clerical), and a write-off rate of 0.14% of capital invested - possibly a
> record low.   I have good systems for risk review and mitigation, and  to
> screen projects, countries, partners, and  agents.
>
> The contracts I have been working on in Mexico are Pemex contracts, but
> are similar to the contracts used by CFE for IPPs, and drafted by the same
> law firm,  if Rosarito is any example.  Having worked on $60 MM claims
> under these contracts, I am very familiar with the problems that these
> contracts have, the various possible interpretations, and the possible
> "fixes".   If, as I suspect, Enron are interested in more power
> development in the rapidly expanding/opening Mexican IPP market, I believe
> I could offer solid advice on the contracts, the players, and the risks.
>
> The first page of my CV is below in e-mail form.  If it is of interest,
> the complete CV is attached.  A list of services my consulting company
> provides is available upon request.  We are basically a boutique business
> consulting firm, consisting of former senior executives of Canadian energy
> firms/governments.  Some of us, myself included, offer multi-lingual
> capabilities.
>
> I can be reached in Mexico City at phone (52) 5290-0117, fax (52) 5291
> 9627 or at the e mail in the CV at any time, or at this e-mail for the
> next two months.
>
I would appreciate if you could circulate this note and my CV to the
appropriate parties in Enron.

> Sincerely,
>
> John Hunter, P. Eng.
>
>
>
> JOHN COLIN HUNTER
>
> 338 Roche Point Drive
> North Vancouver, BC, Canada  V7G 2M2
>
> Tele:  (1-604) 929-3415
> Fax:  (1-604) 929-7168
> E-Mail:  johnhunter@idmail.com
>
>
> PROFILE
>
>    A senior business executive in the energy sector,
> with more than 30 years of diverse experience in Canada and overseas in
> petroleum refining, the upstream oil and gas industry, natural gas utility
> operations and management, and international operations and business
> development in the natural gas and power infrastructure business.
> Multi-lingual.
>
>
> KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS
>
>    * Successful consultant to international joint
> ventures in facilitation, contract disputes, claims, and business
> development, living and working overseas.
>
> * As the first Vice-President, International, of Canada's 17th largest
> company, developed the international strategic plan, and then developed,
> built and operated successful international energy projects.
>
> * Served as President and/or Director of five power generation joint
> ventures.
>
> * As V.P. of Canada's largest integrated gas utility, developed and
> implemented policy to lead the company into the de-regulated environment.
>
> * Restructured, re-staffed and changed the culture of an operating
> department of 220, while accomplishing profitable growth and business
> change.
>
> * Developed and innovatively financed heavy oil projects, and
> completed the successful disposition of $500 MM of oil and gas assets.
>
> * General management skills include leadership, strategic planning,
> marketing, risk assessment/mitigation, operations and project management.
>
>    * Introduction of innovation/change in human
> and technical fields.
>
>    * Proven record of significant
> industry-recognized accomplishments.
>
>    * Proven record as a very strong negotiator
> and contract expert.
>
>
>  <<Resume August 2000.doc>>
>
>
>

 - Resume August 2000.doc


Leon, the account number in the original document is actually not incorrect. This was the account to which the funds were to have been deposited to. However, SCE deposited the funds to a different account.  As a result, I agree that we should amend the document to reflect that the account where these funds where they actually ere actually sent and this will conclude our busines.

Your file did not come over correctly but if you could hand correct the original documents by changing the banking instructions and fax to me, i will provide proper signatures on amendment and we are done.

Thanks. Barry Tycholiz
713-646-2391 (Fax )
713-853-1587 (Phone)

-----Original Message-----
From: Leon.Bass@sce.com [mailto:Leon.Bass@sce.com]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:24 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Cc: Kevin.Cini@sce.com; Jill.Horswell@sce.com; Benny.Wu@sce.com;
Douglas.Porter@sce.com
Subject: SCE/EPMI Transaction Agreement Re; Collateral

Mr. Tycholiz:

I represent SCE's Energy Supply and Marketing Department with respect to
the above-referenced subject.  It is my understanding that the account
number in Section 2 of the Transaction Agreement Regarding Collateral
("Agreement") is incorrect.  I propose that the parties correct the error
by lining out the incorrect number and inserting by hand the correct one.
I have drafted and attached a letter agreement reflecting that intention.
Please review and call me at your earliest opportunity so tht we may
discuss further.  Thank you.

          (See attached file: EnronLetterAgreement.doc)


Lindy, your example is correct for settling operator imbalances.  If we have
a payable operator imbalance
and we settle volumetrically, then we get fuel and transport.  But, I thought
the "netting and trading" in Order 637
was on Shipper imbalances only.  I am not sure what we mean by "no additional
cost, etc" mentioned below.
I'll call you in the morning (Thursday) to discuss further,  since I am not
familiar with the PNM protest.  Thanks. Lynn

Lindy Donoho
12/06/2000 11:19 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW

I think the example of when quantities may be subject to transportation and
fuel is when an Operator overpulls at a delivery point and then cashes out
the imbalance, TW could be out the transport and fuel.  For example,

  DP is SoCal/Needles: scheduled volume is 700,000/d
     actual volume delivered is 720,000/d
     imbalance is 20,000/d, SoCal owes TW
     TW collects transport & fuel on 700,000/d (bill on scheduled volume)
     SoCal cuts a check to TW for dollar value of 20,000/d
     TW doesn't collect transport & fuel on 20,000/d
  Payback in-kind doesn't have this problem:
     The 20,000/d transport gets scheduled at Needles, TW collects the
transport & fuel      (bill on scheduled volume), but we physically give
SoCal 20,000/d less on that day

Is this the correct example?  I'm copying Lynn Blair to verify.

Susan Scott
12/06/2000 09:20 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW

We did not answer protests to our Order 637 filing.

The gist of PNM's protest in RP00-626 is that we shouldn't be able to charge
a transport or fuel fee for our imbalance netting and trading service.  I
agree with PNM that our tariff language is vague in this regard.  What
exactly do we mean by "no additional cost...unless through the allocation
process, quantities may be subject to transportation and fuel"??   Can
someone help me with this?

Since we really did not want to make this compliance filing anyway, I would
say we probably wouldn't mind if FERC rejected our tariff sheet outright.
However, it's more likely that they will just instruct us to clarify our
language.  Or they could tell us to remove the "subject to transportation and
fuel" provision.  If we want to preserve our right to charge transport and
fuel, it might be worthwhile filing something in the way of an answer.
However, I am going to need some assistance in understanding what the
language means and why we think we can do it, so I can justify it to FERC.
Any comments you have in this regard would be appreicated.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/05/2000 05:18 PM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW

Should we respond to PNM's protest of the dollar valuation of imbalances
prior to netting and trading?  Did we already respond to this issue when they
filed their protest of the 637 filing?  DF


Karen- Wanted to say thanks for the gifts you gave me the other day for xmas.
I know I often appear ungrateful but that's what happens when you have 2
thousand things on your mind. The pen and leather "thing" for notes are
great- I'll use both in my annual attempt to get organised. Rick


Interesting.  I remember vaguely that we had some concern with how VAR was
calculated.  I recall that Dave Neubauer didn't think that we were doing it
right for TW.  Do you remember this issue?  If so, does this change address
the same issue?  Also, I'll line up a meeting today or tomorrow on  the TW
options filing in general, and we can discuss the customer meeting and also
touch on this internal controls issue.  Thanks  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/28/2000
11:18 AM ---------------------------

Debbie Moseley
08/25/2000 04:05 PM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Paul Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gilbert/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Carolyn
Henry/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike
McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Heather
Mueck/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Stelly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: ET&S Hedged and Open Positions/Financial Exposure Positions

Please Note:

The Corporate Risk Management Department prepares ET&S's Value at Risk
calculation.  They recently completed a review of our historical experience
and correlation on our hedged positions.  Based on this review, we have
agreed to increase the correlation to .90.  This change has caused the V@R to
decrease significantly to more appropriately reflect the risk in our
positions.  We will continue to work with Risk Management to assure that our
exposures are being appropriately reflected in the V@R calculation.

If there are any question regarding the V@R calculation, please contact Dan
Fancler or Bob Chandler.


FROM: Charlene Jackson, Celeste Roberts

We have been attempting to secure a date to update the Board on the proposed
changes to the Associate and Analyst Programs.  We looked at dates from
mid-February to mid-April and were unable to locate a date on which all Board
members would be available.

The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, March 30th, from 10:00 a.m. ) 12:00
p.m., in the boardroom on the 50th floor.  While not everyone is available on
this date, it is the date on which the largest numbers were available.

We look forward to meeting with you.


we will keep our finger's crossed

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


TECO TAP                 60.000/ ENRON


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 09:27 AM -----

	Shari Stack
	07/31/2000 09:07 AM

		 To: Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Associates

FYI >>>>>

----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 07/31/2000 09:07 AM -----

	Rogelio L?pez Velarde <rlopezv@lvha.com.mx>
	07/28/2000 07:45 PM
	Please respond to Rogelio L?pez Velarde

		 To: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Roy Howell"
<Roy_Howell@ei.enron.com>, "Robert M Sutter"
<Robert_M_Sutter.EES@ei.enron.com>, "Rafael Hernandez" <rhernand@enron.com>,
Matt.Maxwell@enron.com, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark.Dobler@enron.com, "Lisa
Polk" <lpolk@enron.com>, "Leslie Hiltabrand" <lhiltabr@enron.com>, "Leslie A
Ward" <lward2@enron.com>, Leasa L?pez <llopez3@enron.com>, "Kurt Wangenheim"
<kwangenh@enron.com>, "Keneth Krasny" <kkrasny@enron.com>, "Karen Lynn
Harrison" <kharris2@enron.com>, "Joe Hartsoe" <Joe_Hartsoe@ect.enron.com>,
"Jeffrey K Fischer" <jfischer@enron.com>, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT, "James
Harris" <James.Harris@enron.com>, "Deborah Rogers"
<Deborah_Rogers@ei.enron.com>, "Debbie Lucadou" <Debbie.Lucadou@enron.com>,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Annamaria Bosley" <abosley@enron.com>,
Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Associates

Please see attachment.

The information contained herein may be confidential and/or privileged. This
information is intended to be reviewed only by the individual or the entity
to which is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail message is not the
intended recipient or a representative of the intended recipient you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail
message or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender
and delete this message from your system.
 - att1.htm
 - curricula new associates.doc


Starting on Thursday,  April 19, at 2:00 p.m. there will be a weekly telephone conference for the California litigation team.  The objective will be to identify key issues and plan a coordinated strategy for all litigation in California.  The call will last not more than one hour.

	Thus far, the responsibility has been allocated as follows:

1.	PG&E Bankruptcy 		Lisa Mellencamp and Carl Ecklund (LeBoeuf Lamb Greene & McRae)

2.	Class Actions			Richard Sanders and Robin Gibbs (Gibbs & Bruns)

3.	CTC Matters			Bob Williams, Mike Day and Gary Fergus (Brobeck)

4.	FERC Matters		 	Regulatory and Richard Sanders and Dan Watkiss (Bracewell & Patterson)

5.	Government Investigations	Regulatory and Richard Sanders

	Richard Sanders and Robin Gibbs will have overall responsibility for coordination of the litigation.


select curve_def_id curve_cd, book_type_cd, curve_type_cd,insert_user_nm
from egs_curve_def
where effective_dt = trunc(sysdate)

  CURVE_CD B CURV INSERT_USER_NM
---------- - ---- ------------------------------
   3118799 P AP   DQUIGLE
   3118795 P AV   DQUIGLE
   3118800 P BP   DQUIGLE
   3118796 P BV   DQUIGLE
   3118797 I PR   DQUIGLE
   3118801 P PR   DQUIGLE
   3118798 P VO   DQUIGLE
7 rows selected.

as instructed, I deleted the two NG, P,PR price curves and the NG,P,VO volatility curves
from production today. However, it looks like there where a total of 7 curves inserted
into the system. They are all NG curves, do you want to keep them?


Dear Steve,

Here are the presentations that Llewelyn, Mika and I started at lunch today.
They are brief, so if you need any details or have any additional questions,
please contact us.

Mark Crowther
Enron Japan


could you please print this out for me.  greatly indebted.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000 01:25 PM -----

	Alan Comnes@ECT
	11/29/2000 04:47 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, theizenrader@enron.com, Stephen
Swain/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Chandley Harvey Hogan

Jeff,

THIS is the new Harvey Hogan paper (now a Chandley Harvey Hogan paper).  It
was attached to SDG&E's comments.

Tim H., Steve:

This is another view of the market from another set of heavy hitters.

All:

 "Launch" it rather than "view" it.

Alan
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 11/29/2000 04:37
PM ---------------------------

FaxWave Service <faxwave_service@callwave.com> on 11/29/2000 02:28:57 PM
Please respond to "This is a send-only email. Do not reply"
<service-replies@faxwave.com>
To: AComnes@enron.com
cc:

Subject: You've got a Fax!

WIN A DIGITAL CAMERA....TELL YOUR FRIENDS ABOUT CALLWAVE!
Get the details here:
http://www.callwave.com/tellyourfriends.shtml?r=faxemail

HEY! Did you know CallWave has a great NEW FREE SERVICE
available? If you're missing phone calls while surfing the Internet,
or if you've ever tried reaching someone who's online and gotten
the dreaded busy signal, check out the Internet Answering Machine
at http://www.callwave.com/?r=fwemail

Here's what one CallWave customer had to say . . . .

     "I have no computer training whatsoever, and I didn't want to
     have a second phone line installed. But, I really need a way
     for my family to reach me while I'm on-line. Callwave has
     completely taken away any worries. I was so impressed with
     the ease of downloading and installing CallWave!"

Glenda Trammel
Rocky, Oklahoma

************************************************************
This fax is sponsored by FREEWWWEB.

FREEWWWEB is America's 1st provider of FREE INTERNET ACCESS!
Get Freewwweb & join the hundreds of thousands of people who now
enjoy 100% FREE INTERNET ACCESS!!

- NO Monthly Fees!
- No cost to join!
- 56K access!
- Free e-mail!
- No Busy signals!
- Free newsgroups  YOU CAN'T LOSE!!!!

To find out more, goto http://www.freeaccessnow.com
************************************************************
Thank you for using your FaxWave number, 530-327-9235

Your 17 page Fax was received on Wednesday, November 29, 2000
at 2:28 PM Pacific Standard Time.

To view your fax, please click on or download the attached file.

 - 5-975536379.XIF


I will look at this over the weekend.  Scott and JIm, I would appreciate your comments by Monday am.  Thanks.

EveraertN@sullcrom.com on 09/07/2001 08:45:03 AM
To:	vsharp@enron.com
cc:	mark.e.taylor@enron.com, Raislerk@sullcrom.com, GilbergD@sullcrom.com
Subject:	Draft Request for No-Action Letter

Please find attached the draft Request for No-Action Letter for Enron Energy
Services.  This draft incorporates Mark Taylor's comments on the letter.

We believe that it would be an excellent idea to send this letter to the
CFTC as soon as possible.

Please call Ken Raisler at (212) 558-4675, David Gilberg at (212) 558-4680
or me at (212) 558-3255 with any comments or questions.

Sincerely,

Natalie Everaert

 <<No-Action Request - CFTC(v6).DOC>>

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - No-Action Request - CFTC(v6).DOC


yes please...

Thank you Jeff

Dan

From:	Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/23/2001 05:04 PM
To:	Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	FW: Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

Dan:
Is this also information that you'd like to be kept apprised of.  Just let me know.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:02 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; Sanders, Richard B.; Kean, Steven J.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike; Williams, Robert C.; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; Calger, Christopher F.; Belden, Tim; Dietrich, Janet
Subject:	Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid

I talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said:

?	They plan to "settle" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02.
?	Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP.
?	He said that they will propose to net it out in one of two ways:  1) lump sum netting (i.e., if they owe $50MM and the share of the undercollection is $30 MM, then they pay the ESP $20 MM; or 2) future reductions in PX Credit (i.e., they pay the ESP $50 MM, and then reduce the PX going forward until the $30 MM is paid down).  The numbers are illustrative only.
?	In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts.  (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.)
?	I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC.  He agreed.
?	He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison "meet and confer" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing.
?	Fielder is also the point person on "getting ESPs paid" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next.
?	It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago.  Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it.  We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue.

If you have any questions, let us know.

Best,
Jeff


take me with you where ever you go. You de MAN
-----Original Message-----
From: Brady, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

If that is the case then converting 327,081gj's to mm's yields 310,012mm's, so you are probably correct, I can adjust it to reduce down the 12mm's.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Brady, Kevin
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

I wonder if that bigger volume is a gigajoule thing?
-----Original Message-----
From: Brady, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:14 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
I am starting to path it up right now, I have a question regarding the volume. The way I have interpreted these e-mails, we should be withdrawing a total of 310,000 from dawn storage, right now deal1199439 is set up to deliver 327,081. I can adjust the back end days to reduce our deliveries down to 310,000, just want to be sure this is our target #.

Kevin Brady

-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:57 AM
To: Hamic, Priscilla
Cc: Brady, Kevin
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan

Let Kevin know about any suspected unpathed deals and he will get all over it.  This guy is going to be my boss someday.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hamic, Priscilla
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:34 PM
To: Germany, Chris; Greif, Donna; Dinari, Sabra L.; Polsky, Phil
Cc: Concannon, Ruth; Garza, Maria; Dhont, Margaret
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
There is nothing in Deal Volume Tracking regarding this deal.  I checked with Rita Wynne and she says it needs to be pathed.  As soon as that is done and I am notified, we can get the invoice out to MidAmerican.
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:59 PM
To: Hamic, Priscilla; Greif, Donna; Dinari, Sabra L.; Polsky, Phil
Cc: Concannon, Ruth; Garza, Maria
Subject: FW: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Phil and I were just looking at some of the invoices created for March activity and I noticed the sale to MidAmerican Energy was not in his stack of invoices to review.  Would you see if we billed MidAmerican for March please?  The deal number is 1199439, the volume is 310,000 dth and the price is $2.47 per dth.  This was gas that the ENA Ontario desk had parked at Dawn.  There are more notes at the bottom of this email.

-----Original Message-----
From: McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Germany, Chris
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Good Job!  Please document the sale and the other bids, timing issues, costs, and any other factors that led to or affected the sale.  If you have any questions, please ask.
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Mann, Kay; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Parks, Joe
Cc: Price, Wade R.; Dickson, Stacy E.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric; Richardson, Stacey
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Just sold 10,000 MMBtu per day at Dawn to MidAmerican Energy Company at $2.47 for March.  My contact at MidAmerican is Dave Evans (515-281-2698).  Dave said he was using Apr Nymx + $.05 to calculate his price.
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Mann, Kay; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Parks, Joe
Cc: Price, Wade R.; Dickson, Stacy E.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Polsky, Phil; Boyt, Eric
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Update

Robin and I are waiting to hear back from all of the following

company                                                contact
Reliant Energy Services Inc.                    Sue Cozad  989-687-9246  low probability
Enbridge Gas Services Inc.                      Dan White  403-508-3184  new counterparty - low probability
MidAmerican Energy Company                Dave Evans  515-281-2698  good prospect
CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company    Scott Biscoe  713-230-7286  low probability

El Paso      - no interest.

Left messages with
Duke Energy Marketing Ltd.                Steve Butler  403-297-9840
TXU Energy???                                    David Jones

-----Original Message-----
From: Dickson, Stacy E.
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:34 PM
To: Mann, Kay; Germany, Chris
Cc: Price, Wade R.
Subject: RE: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) in Canada is levied on sales of gas at a delivery point in Canada and where the gas will not be exported from Canada. The buyer pays the seller the amount of the  GST which is a per cent of the purchase price.  The seller, in turn, remits the amount of the GST to the appropriate Canadian authority.  In structuring the deal, be sure that you make it clear that the Contract Price does not include the GST.   If the gas it to be exported the buyer needs to notify that the gas is "zero-rated"  so it is not subject to the GST.

Wade - Do you know who in settlements is handling GST payments?  I hope we still have someone who can do that.

Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Stacy
x3-5705
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:02 PM
To: Dickson, Stacy E.
Subject: FW: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Do you know the answer to the tax question, or at least who to ask?

Thanks,

Kay
-----Original Message-----
From: Germany, Chris
Sent: Tue 2/26/2002 5:46 PM
To: Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Boyt, Eric; Garza, Maria; Polsky, Phil; Dicarlo, Louis; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Parks, Joe; Mann, Kay
Cc: Fowler, Kulvinder; Schumack, Sherlyn
Subject: Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Opps.  Didn't mean to hit send it just yet.  Much better now.
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Germany, Chris
Sent:   Tuesday, February 26, 2002 5:39 PM
To:     McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; Boyt, Eric; Garza, Maria; Polsky, Phil; Dicarlo, Louis; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Parks, Joe; Mann, Kay
Cc:     Fowler, Kulvinder; Schumack, Sherlyn
Subject:        Enbridge Consumers' Gas Park & Loan
Today we discovered that ENA has 310,000 MMBtu parked with The Consumers' Gas Company Ltd. (an affiliate of Enbridge Inc.) at Dawn that needs to be withdrawn by March 31, 2002.    Dan White (403-508-3184) at Enbridge faxed me their confirmation.  According to Dan, this gas was parked in May and June 2001.  Per Enbridge's confirmation, "Customer shall pay Enbridge a fee of $.22 US/MMBtu...prorated over 12 months".  The confirmation makes it clear that March withdrawals are interruptible.  Dan didn't know if ENA has paid the fee but he is letting ENA take this gas for March!!!  So far have not been able to find a deal ticket in Sitara or tagg that applies to this deal.
Tomorrow, I will get bids from some of the companies ENA has done business with in the past at Dawn.  Before I sell the gas, I will
        1.  verify the creditworthiness of the company we are selling to
        2.  make sure the company we are selling to agrees to pay us for the gas and doesn't net this with some other item.
Kay, the point we are selling the gas at is Dawn which is in Canada.  Are there any special tax issues to address?

Any comments or questions?

Listed below are some of the companies ENA has done business with at Dawn
AEP Energy Services, Inc.
Aquila Canada Corp.
BP Canada Energy Company
Cargill Energy Trading Canada, Inc.
CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company
CoEnergy Trading Company
Consumers Energy Company
Consumers Gas Company Ltd., The
Coral Energy Canada Inc.
Duke Energy Marketing Limited Partnership
Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C.
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Dynegy Canada Marketing and Trade, a division of Dynegy Canada Inc.
El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P.
Engage Energy Canada L.P.
Nexen Marketing
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
PG&E Energy Trading, Canada Corporation
PG&E Energy Trading-Gas Corporation
Phibro Inc.
Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
Sempra Energy Trading Corp.
TXU Energy Trading Canada Limited
WPS Energy Services, Inc.


As you know, the mid year PRC process is underway.  The system "officially"
closed for feedback last Friday, 6/1.  The system will remain usable by
supervisors until the PRC process has completed.  Below is a schedule of
other dates that you should be aware of:

6/18  EGM Commercial Support PRC Meeting
6/19  EGM Trading PRC Meeting
6/20  EGM Origination PRC Meeting

6/25  Associate and Analyst PRC Meeting

7/10  EWS Final PRC Meeting
(In this meeting, Mgr and above will be cross-calibrated for all of EWS.
Below Mgr, the curves for each job group will be reviewed at the business
unit level and then overall for EWS.  At the end of this meeting, there will
be a pre-PRC for VP's in preparation for the 7/23 meeting.)

7/23 & 7/24 Executive Committee PRC
  (In this meeting, VP's and MD's will be rated relative to their peers
across Enron.)

A few side notes:

? Please make sure your employees have completed a self-evaluation.  The
"accomplishments" section of this evaluation is viewable in the PRC meeting
in which the employee is reviewed.  (As of today, the system will still allow
employees to complete the self-evaluation.)
?
? As you are preparing to represent employees in a PRC meeting, be aware that
the consolidated feedback and self-evaluation are printable.
?
? Lastly, if you will be asking any of your direct reports to attend one of
the EGM meetings on 6/19-6/20, please let me know asap.  I must provide a
complete list of meeting participants before we are able to conduct the
meeting.  (Pls. err on the side of less rather than more people while
ensuring that employees receive fair representation).

Please call me (ext. 59386) or Khymberly Booth (ext. 36019) should you have
any additional questions.


Just wondering if you guys had looked into the mystery option exercise income that is showing up on my pay stub?

Chris


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 04:06 PM
---------------------------

"Conrad Neal" <cneal@bluegate.com> on 02/26/2001 03:54:49 PM
Please respond to <cneal@bluegate.com>
To: "'Neal, Chris'" <chrisn@thisco.com>
cc: "'Neal, William'" <billnealmd@hotmail.com>, "'Neal, Eric'"
<ericn@thisco.com>, "'Neal, Scott'" <sneal@enron.com>, "'Neal, Todd'"
<todd.neal@chron.com>, "'Neal, John'" <muddywaters@hubserv.com>
Subject: Willis Tree Farm- Schedule E for 2000

Chris: I have the Schedule E ready to go. If you want it sent by fax as last
year, please confirm your fax number to me.
I will plan to mail copies to all others on 2/28, unless requested
otherwise.Thanks,

Conrad

 - winmail.dat


Thank you.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nemec, Gerald
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 11:51 AM
To: Petty, Howard
Subject: Re: HTS32 - still in use?

I am no longer a user of this application.

	Howard Petty/ENRON@enronXgate 12/18/2000 09:47 AM 	   To: Audrey
O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Sonneborn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, James R Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken
Choyce/NA/Enron@Enron, Lal Echterhoff/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly L
Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: HTS32 - still
in use?

Hello,

I work in Applications Integration on the GEM Project (Windows 2000
rollout).  It is our mission to ensure that all applications are tested and
packaged for use with Windows 2000 so that the Enron user community can be
migrated to Windows 2000.  I am contacting you because we have identified the
current version of HTS32 as not compatible with Windows 2000 and I found your
name in the application group as one of the users of this application.

I need your help in gathering the following information:

Who is the "owner" of this application (the person who can tell me if it is
still needed)?

Is it still used?

Has it been replaced by another application or a web based application?  If
so, when and which application?

If it is still used:

Vendor (or developer) name?  (please include any contact info. you may have:
web site, contact, phone number).

Who can work with me to obtain the new version (if needed) and test it?

Who uses it (if this list is too large, just note the approximate number of
people)?

Do you foresee that this application will go away in the next couple of
months?

Is your maintenance contract up-to-date?

Please contact me at your earliest convenience.

Thank you,

Howard Petty
Applications Integration
x35405


This note was somehow forwarded to me.

	Paul de Canha
	10/17/2000 12:15 PM

		 To: Rikesh Patel/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Enron Europe CP Name Changes, ECT London Credit, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty
		 Subject: Re: Amendment - IPG LTD, Bahamas C/O IPG, S.A.K., Kuwait :
Singapore Crude Financials (01K2) (Non-EFFT)

Rikesh

I have changed the counterparty name as requested from Independent Petroleum
Group Ltd. (CP ID  :68428)  =>

 Independent Petroleum Group Limited, Bahamas C/O Independent Petroleum Group
S.A.K, Kuwait

The contact details are also in correctly

Regards
Paul
35593

Rikesh Patel
17/10/2000 17:41
To: Enron Europe Global CounterParty
cc: New Counterparty Contacts

Subject: Amendment - IPG LTD, Bahamas C/O IPG, S.A.K., Kuwait : Singapore
Crude Financials (01K2) (Non-EFFT)

Hi Guys,

I have had a letter from the above counterparty to amend its entity name.

Please can you amend it within GCP.

There is already IPG LTD within GCP, which can be inactivated.

Thanks

Ricky


Thank you! - pvc

At 09:19 AM 5/3/01 -0500, you wrote:

>Pam,
>
>Another group:
>
>Stuart Hamel
>Jed Howard
>Brian Nelson
>
>
>
>B+
>
>
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>Pamela Vande Krol Castro <castro@rice.edu> on 05/03/2001 08:58:24 AM
>
>To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: Grades
>
>
>Got them - thank you! - pvc
>
>At 05:21 PM 5/2/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >Pam,
> >
> >Another team:
> >
> >Elena Chilkina
> >Robert J. Guadette
> >Joseph Helms
> >Kenneth Jett
> >Todd Litton
> >MarK Westmoreland
> >
> >
> >Grade:  A-
> >
> >
> >Vince Kaminski


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001
09:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 09:31 AM
To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--5/2/01


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001
05:43 PM ---------------------------

Tom Halliburton@ENRON
03/07/2001 04:37 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chonawee Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: LP Storage Model documentation

Vince - here's the documentation for the storage models.
Tom


????
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000
05:07 PM ---------------------------

Jeff Donahue
09/01/2000 06:06 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Dave:

Attached is a draft of the responsibility and timing for all the assets in
the portfolio.  I was in meetings today and was not able to sit down with
Dick but will do so on Tuesday to move the majority, all except Heartland,
from '01 to '00.

Expect a revised version no later than Wednesday.

Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Beth A Ryan/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2000 03:38
PM ---------------------------

Brian Redmond
02/07/2000 03:35 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: 2000 Goals & Objectives

Team:

The attached provides a summary of our goals & objectives for 2000.  We have
a number of challenges this year, but we making good progress building on our
success in 1999.

The 2000 goals and objectives were developed as part of last year's budget
process and were refined during our recent offsite.    A compilation of the
presentations from the offsite were distributed to each of the VP's for
discussion with their groups.  It will take continued effort from each of us
to shift our source of earnings from monetizations to commercial
origination.  As always, your ideas and active participation is encouraged.

Regards,
Brian


2001 Enron MS Walk and Roll
     Saturday, April 21, 9:00 am

Enron is the proud sponsor of this year,s Multiple Sclerosis Walk in Oregon.
As a first time sponsor for this event, Enron will receive tremendous
exposure in our community.  We would like to encourage all employees to
participate in this event to be held on Saturday, April 21, 9:00 am.  Dollars
raised by this Walk fund local health-related and educational services as
well as help support national research efforts to find the cause and cure for
this disease.

Each employee should have received a &Be A Lifesaver8 notice about this event
with the MS Society Walk brochure attached.  Portland employees of Enron
Broadband Services and Enron North America have partnered to form TEAM ENRON.
 Our goal is to have one of the largest teams in Portland - we want over 200
TEAM ENRON members!

Our team is not just limited to Enron employees.  We encourage all employees,
contractors, vendors, family members (including children) and friends.  This
will be a fun gathering for TEAM ENRON and offers entertainment, food and
activities for children.

If you are interested in participating, please provide your REGISTRATION form
(on the pamphlet or paper you received) to Jessica Burry or Anna Mehrer. We
want to start counting up the number of TEAM ENRON members in order to keep
everyone posted on our progress.

A Kick-Off meeting for all Portland employees will be held in early March.
Incentive prizes are awarded through the MS Walk; Enron will also be awarding
some great incentives to TEAM ENRON members.  Stay tuned for more details.

If you have any questions or you need extra REGISTRATION forms, pledge cards,
etc., contact Jessica Burry (503-464-3800) or Anna Mehrer (503-464-3834).


Enron Methanol nominates the following requirements for the Methanol Plant
for March 2000:

     March 1st &2nd                            32,000  mmbtu per day
     March 3rd through 12th                0 mmbtu ( Plant down for repairs)
     March 13th through 31st             32,000 mmbtu per day

NOTE: NATURAL GAS TO BE BOUGHT AT THE "GAS DAILY MID" DUE TO PLANT OUTAGE FOR
THE METHANOL PLANT ONLY.

EGPFC nominates the following for the MTBE Plant at Morgan's Point for March
2000

   10,000 mmbtu per day


State PUC Takes On High Cost Of Energy
Regulators foresee more rate increases
Robert Salladay, Lynda Gledhill, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Monday, March 12, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/12/M
N227831.DTL
Sacramento -- Starting this week, state regulators will begin debating how
much is enough when it comes to asking Californians to shoulder the
electricity crisis by paying higher utility rates.
Right now, there doesn't appear to be enough money to go around. The state
government and the utilities have racked up monumental bills because of
California's flawed deregulation system. And even with recent rate increases,
not enough cash is coming in to pay off the debts and buy power.
Over the next three weeks, deciding how that money gets divvied up to pay the
state's debt will be one of the toughest jobs of the year. State Treasurer
Philip Angelides said the state Public Utilities Commission would be
essentially filling a shoe box with debts and commitments during a series of
meetings and workshops this month, and it's going to be a tight fit without
raising power bills even more.
"The rubber hits the road in the next few weeks at the PUC," Angelides said.
"There is a box that has to be filled up, and a no-rate-increase scenario is
putting all of these things into this box. It'll be tough work."
Under the law, the PUC has the power to essentially determine how much profit
the utilities can make. It's a set formula, designed to give the power
companies a comfortable margin and to keep power bills reasonable for
consumers.
But with the 1996 deregulation an utter failure in California, there are many
more demands on that money. The utilities claim to be $14 billion in debt.
The state of California is spending $45 million a day to buy power. Taxpayers
have spent $3.2 billion so far, and the PUC recently said utility customers
would be required to pay that money back.
Then there is the $10 billion in bonds the state is selling to buy long- term
contracts for power. Angelides said the PUC also must guarantee him an
estimated $1.3 billion a year from consumers to pay off the bonds, which his
office expects to begin selling by the end of May.
That money could end up running out by September, or June 2002 under the most
optimistic prediction, Angelides said. That could mean California would have
to borrow even more money beyond the $10 billion -- money that consumers will
most likely have to pay back through their bills.
Gov. Gray Davis has said repeatedly that it is his "hope and expectation"
that rates will not increase. But he has been criticized for seeming to say
that a temporary rate increase approved in January will be made permanent and
that a 10 percent rate decrease imposed when deregulation was implemented
will be lifted next year.
"If I wanted to raise rates, I could have solved this in 20 minutes," Davis
said last month.
But others are convinced now that rates will go up even more than the 19
percent. And PUC Commissioner Richard Bilas said he thinks the rates should
go up before the summer to encourage conservation.
'FUNDAMENTALS DON'T CHANGE'
"It doesn't matter what is done in terms of rhetoric, legislation, ideas or
proposals at the commission -- the fundamentals don't change," said Bilas, a
Republican. "There is not enough supply and too much demand. The only
function on the demand side is a rate increase. Otherwise, people won't stop
using electricity."
Since the state is buying roughly 30 percent of the power used by the
utilities -- and at the highest prices so far -- the state should be entitled
to an equivalent share of the money coming in from consumers.
"If we're going to issue bonds, we must have first (crack at) that money,"
Angelides said. His office believes that "a failure to (issue bonds) in the
appropriate manner will directly and negatively impact consumer rates."
Angelides also needs a commitment from the PUC over how the state will get
repaid for the money it's spending to buy emergency power the utilities
cannot afford to purchase.
Bilas said the PUC, which will take up some of these issues at their meeting
on Thursday, would have to face reality soon.
'IT'S A BAND-AID'
"It's the direction we have been moving in," he said. "We're having to face
up to fact that there needs to be rate increase. What is being done isn't a
solution to the problem -- it's a Band-Aid."
The utilities, among others, are eyeing the money as well for their
significant costs. They have accumulated massive debts that need to be
repaid, and have investors to satisfy.
Also looking for a slice of the pie are the alternative energy producers --
including wind and solar producers -- who depend on payments from the
utilities to buy the natural gas they need to operate.
These facilities account for nearly a third of the energy produced in
California, and any scenario that has the state getting through the summer
without significant blackouts requires full operation.
"What everybody has told me is this summer is going to be murder, because we
don't have enough," state Senate President pro tem John Burton, D-San
Francisco, said recently.
Three things are occurring that are designed to make sure the money going out
to pay for debts and power is slightly less than the money coming in from
consumers:
Small alternative energy providers are expected to start getting lower
payments.
Utilities, as part of a state rescue plan still being negotiated, will be
required to sell the electricity they generate themselves at cost.
The state is signing long-term contracts for its share of power, which
reduces demands on ratepayers.
The idea is to leave enough headroom that will pay back the state for what it
is spending over a long period of time.
Angelides said the difference -- that headroom -- should be returned to the
state to pay off the debts it incurred from the long-term contracts financed
with the bond money and to buy emergency power.
STATE WANTS ITS SHARE
"We stepped into the breach here," Angelides said. "We're entitled to a fair
slice of the pie."
Angelides said the new rate schedule, which the PUC is determining this
month, should not be used to pay back utilities for any of their debts from
before Jan. 17. That's when the state started buying power for the utilities.
So far, the utilities are not asking for their past debts to be repaid. Some
other financing for those must be developed, such as selling thousands of
miles of electrical transmission lines to raise billions of dollars.
But there may not be much headroom left to pay off all the other debts.
Chris Danforth with the Office of Ratepayer Advocates, which is designed to
make sure consumers get a good deal out of the PUC, said the future payments
to the alternative facilities and contracts signed by the state were going to
cost more than originally planned.
That eats up some of the headroom and "is indicative of a rate increase,"
Danforth said.
Paying the Bill
Most of what PG&E customers pay for electricity is spoken for but the demands
are about to get a lot bigger. .
Breakdown of contributors to electricity production
PG&E generated power -- What the utility produces at its own plants.
Alternative energy -- Electricity generated by solar, wind and biomass
companies.
Independent generators -- Power produced at non-PG&E plants in California and
elsewhere. .
PG&E customers currently pay 6.5 cents per kilowatt hour
Combined sources of electricity cost 6.134 cents per kilowatt hour
This portion represents 0.366 cents of leftover money .
Claims on leftover money
-- Money owed to the Independent System Operator, which has been forced to
buy electricity at very high prices in recent months.
-- Money owed to the alternative energy providers. Many of these small units
have stopped operating because they have not been paid.
-- Emergency power purchases likely to be necessary this summer, since the
state has not secured enough long-term contracts to provide all the power it
needs. That could drain either the state's coffers, or be paid for by
consumers. .
Source: Chronicle research Chronicle Graphic
E-mail the reporters at rsalladay@sfchronicle.com and
lgledhill@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1


Reservation status has changed. Details of the reservation are listed below:
ASSIGNMENT_REF = 30514
SELLER_CODE = AZPS
SELLER_DUNS = 958982563
CUSTOMER_CODE = EPMI
CUSTOMER_DUNS = 848921276
AFFILIATE_FLAG = 0
PATH_NAME = W/AZPS/AZPS-AZPS/FOURCORNE345 - PNPKAPS230//
POINT_OF_RECEIPT = FOURCORNE345
POINT_OF_DELIVERY = PNPKAPS230
SOURCE = FOURCORNERS
SINK = PNPK
CAPACITY = 0
CAPACITY_REQUESTED = 25
SERVICE_INCREMENT = HOURLY
TS_CLASS = FIRM
TS_TYPE = POINT_TO_POINT
TS_PERIOD = OFF_PEAK
TS_WINDOW = FIXED
TS_SUBCLASS = WHEEL
NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Nerc Priority 1
OTHER_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY = Default
START_TIME = 05/21/2002
STOP_TIME = 05/21/2002
CEILING_PRICE = 1.95
OFFER_PRICE = 1.95
BID_PRICE = 1.95
PRICE_UNITS = $/mW
PRECONFIRMED = YES
ANC_SVC_LINK = N/A
ANC_SVC_REQ = N/A
POSTING_REF = 0
SALE_REF =
REQUEST_REF =
DEAL_REF =
NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG =
STATUS = RECEIVED
STATUS_NOTIFICATION = lisa.gang@enron.com
STATUS_COMMENTS =
TIME_QUEUED = 05/20/2002

TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE = 05/20/2002
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_COMMENTS =
SELLER_COMMENTS =
CUSTOMER_COMMENTS = FOR INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL (503)464-5070
SELLER_NAME = AZPS
SELLER_PHONE = 602.250.1128
SELLER_FAX = 602.250.1155
SELLER_EMAIL = oasisadm@apsc.com
CUSTOMER_NAME = Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
CUSTOMER_PHONE = (713)853-3801
CUSTOMER_FAX = (713)646-8272
CUSTOMER_EMAIL = bill.rust@enron.com
REASSIGNED_REF = 0
REASSIGNED_CAPACITY = 0


The report named: NG - Price P/L <http://trv.dev.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=10&report_name=NG+-+Price+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=05/22/2001>, published as of 05/22/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Return-Path: <Barbara.Waldrop@cox.com>
Received: from  rly-st07.mail.aol.com (rly-st07.mail.aol.com [172.18.149.18]) by air-yg03.mail.aol.com (v80.17) with ESMTP id MAILINYG33-0913105242; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:52:42 -0400
Received: from rly-yd05.mx.aol.com (rly-yd05.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.5])	  by rly-st07.mail.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/AOL-5.0.0)	  with ESMTP id KAA28434 for <bswaldrop@aol.com>;	  Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:46:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Barbara.Waldrop@cox.com
Received: from  BATL0S04.cbi.cox.com ([206.98.143.251]) by rly-yd05.mx.aol.com (v80.21) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYD53-0913104536; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:45:36 -0400
Received: by mail.cbi.cox.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)	id <RNW6P4CD>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:39:54 -0400
Message-ID: <AD927D10BCE3D211AAF600A0C9EA31B30395A0CB@mail.cbi.cox.com>
To: bswaldrop@aol.com
Subject: FW:
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:39:52 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C13C61.F35BD2A0"

-----Original Message-----
From: Cody, Michael (CBI-Houston)
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:07 AM
To: Allen, Corina(CBI-Houston); Aubry, Christi (CBI-Houston); Bale,
Misty (CBI-Houston radio); Belgara, Melissa (CBI-Houston); Bell, Cindy
(CBI-Houston); Breland, John (CBI-Houston); Brinkman, Cindy
(CBI-Houston); Cantu, Rey (CBI-Houston); Chiang, Johnny (CBI-Houston);
Coates, Casey (CBI-Houston); Compton, Rhonda (CBI-Houston); Davis, Erica
(CBI-Houston); Freddie, Juliet (CBI-Houston); Garza, Sonny
(CBI-Houston); Gautier, Arcalee (CBI-Houston); Gleeson, Sonia
(CBI-Houston); Goldberg, Micah (CBI-Houston); Gonzales, Tim
(CBI-Houston); Hastings, Michelle (CBI-Houston); Hudspeth, Monique
(CBI-Houston); Jenkins, Ko (CBI-Houston); Johnson, Steve (CBI-Houston);
Kelley, Barbara (CBI-Houston); King, Jeanna (CBI-Houston); Kline,
Jeannie (CBI-Houston); long, Libby (CBI-Houston); Martin, Jamie
(CBI-Houston); McDerby, Constance (CBI-Houston); Morrison, Leah
(CBI-Houston); Muguerza, Sandie (CBI-Houston); Murray, Walter
(CBI-Houston); Patterson, Shawn (CBI-Houston); Phifer, Charles
(CBI-Houston); Phifer, Kirk (CBI-Houston); Powell, Jennifer
(CBI-Houston); Rios, Maritza (CBI-Houston); Richardson, Holli
(CBI-Houston); San Marco, Cynthia (CBI-Houston); Sang, Fong
(CBI-Houston); Sherman, Monica (CBI-Houston); Smith, Nikki
(CBI-Houston); Trimmer, Toni (CBI-Houston); Van Dinter, Laura
(CBI-Houston); Varnadoe, Lanette (CBI-Houston); Velasco, Sandra
(CBI-Houston); Waldrop, Barbara (CBI-Houston); Wood, Laurie
(CBI-Houston); Zeledon, Wendy (CBI-Houston)
Subject: FW:
-----Original Message-----
From: Pepe Filippone [mailto:PepeF@MilestoneMortgage.com ]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:15 AM
To: AIMEE COATES1 (E-mail); Billy Parker (E-mail); Blue Hyatt (E-mail);
Brandon Dragsic (E-mail); Brittany Manal (E-mail); Brooks Holzhausen
(E-mail); Coates, Casey (CBI-Houston); Chad Mcbrayer (E-mail); J Weaver
(E-mail); Jim Coates (E-mail); JOAN (E-mail); John Colglazier (E-mail);
Jude Filippone (E-mail); Kay Dunkin (E-mail); Kelly Dietrich (E-mail);
Kevin Leck (E-mail); Kim Massingill (E-mail); MARION FILIPPONE (E-mail);
Mark Danna (E-mail); Matt Orlie (E-mail); Matt Terry (E-mail); Cody,
Michael (CBI-Houston); Parker Harrison (E-mail); Paul Snow (E-mail);
Phillip and Sally (E-mail); Rodney Doutel (E-mail); Ryan Stelter
(E-mail); Sam Foster (E-mail); Steve Liso (E-mail); Tim Tietjen
(E-mail); Todd Bailey (E-mail)
Subject: FW:
-----Original Message-----
From: Diana Cagle
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Abel Rodriguez; Al Bozeman; Andrea Petralia; Andromeda McKinney;
Angel Harrington; Angelica Arenas; Ann Oliphint; Audrey Cowles; Beverley
Chaffee; Bonnie Sanchez; Bryan Pryor; Buz Hodges; Candace Everett; Candy
Poole; Caren Childers; Carol Morris; Carolyn Brown; Carrie Claypool;
Celina Romay; Chanda Gaither; Charles Milby; Chris Holland; Christine
Hernandez; Christine Williams; Cindy Friday; Cory Thompson; David Gill;
Debbie Morrow; Debi Reese; Denise Reed; DeWayne Wilson; Diana Cagle;
Dominik Kilpatrick; Donna Debow; Donna Lalamandier; Doug Hodges; Erin
Pizalate; Gabi Brown; Gary Dolch; Gina Leigh; Glynis Russell; guest2;
Helen Escalante; Ines Rodriguez; James Racanelli; Jan Plant; Jane
Dubose; Jane Hawthorne; Janet Matthews; Janet Steele; Jaynie Harvill;
Jennifer Carr; Jennifer Comer; Jennifer Little; Jerry Neugebauer; Jesse
Garcia; Jill Rodriguez; Jim Hess; Joe Brown; Joel Redmond; John McAdams;
John Shellington; Joseph A. Billot; Josephine Parker-Cervantes; Julia
Pineda; Julie Gordon; Karen Carlisle; Kenton Brown; Kristi Payne;
Kristin Carroll; Larry Doyle; Linda Doyle; Lisa Curry; Lisa Loving; Lori
Garcia; LouAnn Itle; Marsha Odell; Martin Ochs; Mary Arnold; Maureen
Davidson; Mel Whitworth; Michael Nasserfar; Michael Wood; Michelle
Herring; Milestone; Milly Saldarriaga; MJ Miller Associates Inc.;
Monelle Newton; Nancy Hazard-Jarrett; NAV for Microsoft Exchange-EMAIL;
Nick Bergenzer; Niles Sheffield; Pamela Olowu; Pat Cassidy; Pat
Peterson; Patti Brenneman; Patti Hodges; Pepe Filippone; Printer; Rachel
Vargas; Randy Sanchez; Rene Munoz; Renee Breaux Locicero; Rhonda Cullen;
Richard McIlveen; Roan King; Robert Bonham; Rosemary Jennings; Roxanne
Cady; Sandra Magee; Sandy DeLaFuente; Seagate; Sean Hammond; Stephanie
Heldt; Susan Muehlstein; Tamra Swindoll; Terri LeMaster; Tiffany
Robertson; Todd Forbes; Walt Brewer; Web Application Manager account
Subject: FW:
-----Original Message-----
From: Degner, Catherine R. [mailto:Catherine.Degner@WaMuLends.net ]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:50 AM
Subject: FW:

Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:27 PM
Subject: Fwd: Americans Show Unity Against Terrorism - Friday, 09.14.01
Friday Night at 7:00 p.m. step out your  door, stop your car, or step out
of your establishment and light a candle.
We will show the world that
Americans are strong and united  together against terrorism.
Please pass this to everyone on your e-mail  list.
We need to reach everyone across the United States quickly.
The message: WE STAND UNITED - WE WILL NOT TOLERATE  TERRORISM!
Thank you.
We need press to cover this - we need the  world to see.


Thanks Tana.....  John


Now that's funny!


Could a tape be made available for Gas Control shift workers at EB4225 like it was last year? Thanks.


Dan Douglass has drafted joint comments for two coalitions in which Enron is a member -- Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and Western Power Trading Forum.  Robert, feel free to contact Dan directly with your comments.  Let me know your thoughts as well.  I am out of the office at a WPTF meeting. Dan is here as well. If you need to contact me, you can leave me a message on my office phone or try my cell (415 -- 902-4108), but I'm not sure the cell is working all the time.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001 07:35 AM -----

	"Dan Douglass" <douglass@energyattorney.com> 06/20/2001 10:59 PM 	   To: "ARM" <arem@electric.com>  cc:   Subject: Comments on Draft Decisions Regarding PX Credit and Direct Access

Attached for your review and comment is my first draft of comments to be  filed on Monday with regard to the draft decisions of ALJ Barnett and  Commissioner Bilas.  Please review it carefully, as I have thrown in  everything I can think of on a rush basis, and it may require some significant  editing.  Pay particular attention to Section V dealing with Bilas' request  for parties to discuss alternatives to DA suspension.  The draft offers a  compromise to the DWR's concerns, as expressed in the Angelides memo.   Also, notice that Section VI urges the Commission to bifurcate the DA and PX  credit issues, acting quickly on the first, if it must, but more leisurely on  the PX credit subject.

Finally, I have a suggestion in the form of a question.  How  would AReM members feel about making this a joint filing with WPTF?  There  is cross-membership between the two groups and the same issues would be raised  in the separate filings which I am otherwise prepared to draft.  This draft  would requires some modifications so as to refer to the "Joint Parties" as  opposed to solely mentioning AReM, and I might  add a section dealing more  explicitly with WPTF's contribution to getting the zero minimum bill stipulation  signed in the first place.  Otherwise, the document would stay much as it  is (subject to your input over the next few days, of course).  Please let  me know what you think asap, as I am already working on a WPTF draft.   Incidentally, I will also be filing comments on behalf of ABAG which will  support the positions taken in the attached document, but I am not proposing  that ABAG also be a party to this filing.  Thanks for your help!   Comments as soon as possible would be very much appreciated!

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite  244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:   (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com

 - Blank Bkgrd.gif
 - 6-25-01 AReM Comments - Draft 1.doc


I am getting several phone calls from Alpine Resources demanding to be paid
for meter 5892 and there is nothing there to be paid.

The person name doing the requesting is John Childers and he said that he
spoke to Daren Farmer.  He is looking for 859 mmbtu's for December, 2000 and
3,251 mmbtu's for January 2001 .  This is on the Katy Gas Unit.  If anyone
would like to talk to John his phone number is 281-646-0232

Charlene
X31539


FYI - would love to have your comments or suggestions
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000 09:11 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           10/18/2000 09:11 PM

To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Draft Agenda

Attached is a draft agenda for your review and comments.  As speakers were
confirmed, the placement of certain items on the agenda were dictated by the
speakers' schedules and then logical grouping of topics around those
speakers.  Sunday evening will not be heavy - simple welcome and intros,
drink and dinner - I know that many will be tired from traveling.  We have
arranged for a private showing of the movie Rogue Trader (complete with comfy
chairs and popcorn) which I thought could be fun for the group to see as a
means of setting the stage for our discussions on Monday and Tuesday.  This
can be optional, as I know that jet lag my get the best of some.

The morning on Monday will set the stage:  why we have gathered, endorsement
of our efforts (Causey).  Perhaps you, Brent and I could each give a short
"state of the union of operations" according to us - covering ENA, EGM and
EEL).  Then definition of the operating standards that we must uphold,
discussion, plans on reporting and buy in on these.

Monday lunch will allow everyone to share with their tablemates a project in
which they are involved that will have an impact on global consistency of
operational controls, or a project which through sharing or expanding could
have such an impact.  Each table can report back as we gather to start the
afternoon.

Having defined and discussed fundamental operating standards, we will move
Monday afternoon to review of the Doorstep concept: what, why, how and
lessons learned.  Then we will discuss next steps around this on-going
project.

Just before the afternoon break, we will roll out a new communications tool
for the operations controllers:  a website tailored for the group.

We will finish the afternoon by tying in operations performance and its
impact on assessing and measuring market risk and credit risk, with Ted
Murphy and Bill Bradford addressing the group.

Monday evening will include a tour of Enron Field and dinner at Ruggles
Center Field Terrace.  Bill Bradford will join us for dinner, and we are
waiting for an RSVP from Ted Murphy.

Tuesday morning will start with Jeff Skilling as our real keynote speaker.
He plans to spend an hour plus with the group.  He will make an informal
presentation and then will entertain questions.  The rest of the morning will
be spent in breakout teams, with assignments to come up with specific action
steps to strengthen operating controls, improve the accuracy of information
provided and move toward best practices in providing mid and back office
services within Enron.

Before lunch, Tom Gros and I will share a short story on CommodityLogic.
Philippe Bibi will join us for lunch to share his IT vision with the group.
After lunch, we will wrap up and summarize next steps, including a date to
reconvene much of this group perhaps early in 2001 to check progess against
our designated next steps (wholesale group in London perhaps).

Please call me or e:mail any comments or suggestions.  The only details still
in flux are Tom Gros' availability and confirmation of Philippe's
attendance.


per vm
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/21/99 09:25
AM ---------------------------

"Sheryl Gussett" <sgussett@bracepatt.com> on 12/20/99 05:00:15 PM
To: MOORCH@andrews-kurth.com, POPPT@andrews-kurth.com, "G. Alan Rafte"
<arafte@bracepatt.com>, "Mary Moreland" <mmoreland@bracepatt.com>, "Thomas
Tomlinson" <ttomlinson@bracepatt.com>, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gareth
Bahlmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clement Abrams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Deborah
Culver/HOU/EES@EES, Jimmie Williams/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Callan/HOU/EES@EES,
Scott Donaldson/HOU/EES@EES, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
eawilburn@prickett.com, Kenton@rlf.com, jephross@velaw.com
cc: BARBD@andrews-kurth.com, DGUEST2@andrews-kurth.com,
LOWED@andrews-kurth.com, MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com
Subject: Re: Enron/Blackbird

Really, here is the attachment.  Sorry for the confusion.

 - schedule


Great news and congrats!

Robert Hemstock@ECT
11/26/2000 01:19 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT

Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

Rick,

You will recall Steve Kean participated in a conference call on Nov 14 with
John Lavorato et al to discuss emergency Pool Rule changes that the Power
Pool intended to implement in two days.  We developed a 5 point action plan
to deal with the proposed Power Pool rule changes that would have a
significant impact on the value of Enron's PPA investment in Alberta.
By way of update to Steve, you may wish to brief him that: 1) It appears the
Power Pool will not proceed with the rule change designed to exclude
importers from setting pool price.  They will proceed with dispatch risk rule
changes but we have given input on those too and I am optimistic that Enron
will be able to live with these rule changes, the final wording of which we
should see on Monday, 2) We  have set up a meeting with the Minister of
Resource Development (you, Rob Milnthorp and I will attend) on December 11 to
encourage the Alberta Government to stay the course, and 3) This week we will
finalize our "Lessons from other Jurisdictions" document (that Steve sent me
materials to include in) and will provide it to the Alberta Government and
Power Pool and then follow up with them.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT on 11/25/2000
11:52 PM ---------------------------

Robert Hemstock
11/25/2000 11:53 PM
To: Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, John
Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: aleck.trawick@blakes.com, dpef@blakes.com, Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
Subject: Update - Proposed Alberta Power Pool Rule Changes

The attached memo provides an update on the status of the Power Pool's
further consideration of the proposed rule changes.  In summary, it appears
the Pool will not proceed with the proposal to exclude import offers from
setting pool price but will recommend a rule that reduces ability of
suppliers to become price takers on volumes that were originally priced too
high to clear the merit order.  I will receive more specifics on the dispatch
risk rule change on Monday.

Regards,

Rob


Start Date: 1/16/02; HourAhead hour: 5;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011605.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Ken,

The attached was inadvertantly omitted from my earlier  email.  My apologies.

Damon A. Silvers
Associate General Counsel
AFL-CIO
815 16th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 637-3953
fax (202) 637-5323DSilvers@aflcio.org

 - AFL-CIO Enron press release.doc


Humberto - I forwarded your resume to Barry Hunsaker who is general counsel
at EOG Resources.  As you may know, EOG used to be Enron Oil and Gas, a
majority-owned Enron subsidiary.  A couple of years ago, Enron sold its
interest in EOG and it became a stand alone company.  EOG Resources has been
doing very well.  I don't know if they are looking for lawyers now, but I
think I sent your resume to the right place.

"Humberto Kuhn" <BetoKuhn@msn.com> on 05/21/2001 11:17:21 AM
To: <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Humberto (Beto) Kuhn, resume

Dear Steve:? With sincere and advance thanks, and pursuant to your recent
conversation with my brother, George, I attach a copy of?the short version?of
my resume.? I have a longer detailed version, as well as numerous references,
that I will be pleased to furnish you.? In addition, I am at your disposal at
any time that?you or any others at ENRON should wish to meet with me.?
Again,?my thanks for your assistance and guidance.
?
Kind regards,
?
?
Beto Kuhn
Cell:? 713/ 906-8463
Res:? 713/ 467-3974
 - RESUME HGK,Short Form 05-01.doc


The Envision Team is in the process of updating our User database and need to request additional information from you.  For audit purposes we now need to have your P number (PID). The PID is an unsecured number that is part of Enron's Global Strategy to match an employee to his/her unsecured data which consist of email address, phone number, mailstop, company, cost center and manager.  NO access to personal or secured data is given.

 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at 713/853-1555 opt 1.  Thank you.

Envision/EnCompass Support Team
Envision:   www.ets.enron.com/envision


Both assignment letters were mailed today by certified mail.

Linda S. Bryan
Ext. 3-3538

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:56 PM
To:	Bryan, Linda S.
Cc:	Hall Jr., Robert L.
Subject:	RE: Assignment Letters

Attached are the consent to assignment letters. We will need two executables of each.  Let me know if you will be the one sending these out for execution.

 << File: Consent(LGS).doc >>  << File: Consent(NOPSI).doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bryan, Linda S.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Assignment Letters

What is the status on the assignment letters assigning the LGS Natural Gas Co. and Entergy New Orleans contracts to Bridgeline?

Linda S. Bryan
Ext. 3-3538


Please note that tag number 11863 was canceled and 11870 has been created in
it's place.

Thanks,
Stacy
---------------------- Forwarded by Stacy Runswick/PDX/ECT on 11/17/2000
03:08 PM ---------------------------
   Stacy Runswick                11/17/2000 11:43 AM

To: Portland Shift
cc: John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark
Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gang/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: ATTENTION!! Possible Derate on the Devers line for Monday Nov. 20th

It was rumoured by Reliant that there is a possibility the Devers line will
derate on Monday, Nov. 20th.  AZPS was unable to confirm this rumour and
stated that they will post the information on their web site Saturday, Nov.
18th.  We think the Devers line will be derated on Monday hrs. ending 10-16.
There has been no word about the N. Gilla line.  Because this rumour could
not be confirmed, we had to schedule as normal for that day.  For your
convenience I have supplied a list below of all the TAGS I have done for PV
Heavyload on Monday that may be effected.   Good Luck.

Stacy

EPMI TAG NUMBERS


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000
02:06 PM ---------------------------

"Southwest Airlines" <special-offers-admin@mail.southwest.com> on 04/18/2000
12:33:25 AM
Please respond to "Southwest Airlines"
<special-offers-admin@mail.southwest.com>
To: "Special Offers" <special-offers1@mail.southwest.com>
cc:  (bcc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Click 'n Save Internet Specials April 18, 2000

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save(R) E-mail Update for
April 18, 2000

Please pass this great news on to your friends! To subscribe
to Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

** These fares are valid for travel May 9, 2000
through September 11, 2000, except for May 26 and 29, 2000.
Ticketless travel must be purchased online at
www.southwest.com by midnight Pacific Standard Time
April 20, 2000. ** Please see Other Terms and
Conditions of these fares at the end of this e-mail.

The fares listed do not include airport-assessed passenger
facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip. Roundtrip
purchase and overnight stay are required. Fares do not
include a federal excise tax of $2.50 that will be imposed
on each flight segment of your itinerary. A flight segment
is defined as a takeoff and a landing.

Fares shown are each way based on roundtrip purchase

Albany
$59 each way to/from Cleveland
$64 each way to/from Nashville
$79 each way to/from Orlando

Albuquerque
$36 each way to/from El Paso
$40 each way to/from Midland/Odessa

Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love
$54 each way to/from Lubbock
$62 each way to/from San Antonio

Austin
$60 each way to/from El Paso
$39 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley
$58 each way to/from Jackson, MS
$42 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$89 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Baltimore/Washington
$52 each way to/from Birmingham
$34 each way to/from Cleveland
$34 each way to/from Hartford/Springfield
$34 each way to/from Long Island/Islip
$36 each way to/from Louisville
$44 each way to/from Nashville
$61 each way to/from Orlando

Birmingham
$52 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$56 each way to/from Columbus
$34 each way to/from Louisville
$37 each way to/from New Orleans

Boise
$53 each way to/from Las Vegas
$36 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe
$63 each way to/from San Jose

Burbank
$36 each way to/from Oakland
$36 each way to/from Sacramento

Chicago Midway
$34 each way to/from Cleveland
$89 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
$34 each way to/from Indianapolis
$40 each way to/from Kansas City
$34 each way to/from Louisville
$66 each way to/from Providence

Cleveland
$59 each way to/from Albany
$34 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$34 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$60 each way to/from Hartford/Springfield
$41 each way to/from Long Island/Islip
$42 each way to/from Louisville
$61 each way to/from Omaha

Columbus
$56 each way to/from Birmingham
$62 each way to/from Kansas City
$54 each way to/from Nashville
$45 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$61 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Corpus Christi
$62 each way to/from Jackson, MS

Dallas Love
$36 each way to/from Amarillo
$56 each way to/from El Paso
$36 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$36 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$61 each way to/from Jackson, MS
$36 each way to/from Lubbock
$36 each way to/from Midland/Odessa
$36 each way to/from San Antonio

Detroit
$59 each way to/from Kansas City
$42 each way to/from Louisville

El Paso
$36 each way to/from Albuquerque
$60 each way to/from Austin
$56 each way to/from Dallas Love
$40 each way to/from Lubbock
$58 each way to/from San Antonio

Ft. Lauderdale
$89 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$50 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley
$39 each way to/from Austin
$38 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$69 each way to/from Tulsa

Hartford/Springfield
$34 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$60 each way to/from Cleveland
$65 each way to/from Nashville

Houston Bush Intercontinental
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love
$54 each way to/from Little Rock
$48 each way to/from Lubbock
$56 each way to/from Tulsa

Houston Hobby
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love
$38 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley
$54 each way to/from Little Rock
$48 each way to/from Lubbock
$40 each way to/from New Orleans
$56 each way to/from Tulsa

Indianapolis
$34 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$64 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
$51 each way to/from Tulsa

Jackson, MS
$58 each way to/from Austin
$62 each way to/from Corpus Christi
$61 each way to/from Dallas Love
$62 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$58 each way to/from Tulsa

Jacksonville, FL
$64 each way to/from Indianapolis
$50 each way to/from Nashville
$34 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Kansas City
$40 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$62 each way to/from Columbus
$59 each way to/from Detroit
$92 each way to/from Phoenix
$34 each way to/from St. Louis

Las Vegas
$53 each way to/from Boise
$34 each way to/from Ontario, CA
$36 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe
$47 each way to/from Sacramento
$51 each way to/from San Francisco

Little Rock
$54 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$54 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$38 each way to/from Louisville
$57 each way to/from Oklahoma City

Long Island/Islip
$34 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$41 each way to/from Cleveland
$54 each way to/from Louisville

Los Angeles
$34 each way to/from Phoenix
$48 each way to/from Salt Lake City
$36 each way to/from San Jose
$34 each way to/from Tucson

Louisville
$36 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$34 each way to/from Birmingham
$34 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$42 each way to/from Cleveland
$42 each way to/from Detroit
$38 each way to/from Little Rock
$54 each way to/from Long Island/Islip
$63 each way to/from Oklahoma City
$61 each way to/from Orlando
$61 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Lubbock
$54 each way to/from Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love
$40 each way to/from El Paso
$48 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$48 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$57 each way to/from Oklahoma City

Manchester
$67 each way to/from Nashville
$50 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Midland/Odessa
$40 each way to/from Albuquerque
$42 each way to/from Austin
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love
$57 each way to/from Oklahoma City

Nashville
$64 each way to/from Albany
$44 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$54 each way to/from Columbus
$65 each way to/from Hartford/Springfield
$50 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
$67 each way to/from Manchester
$54 each way to/from Omaha
$67 each way to/from Providence
$57 each way to/from Tampa Bay

New Orleans
$37 each way to/from Birmingham
$40 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$62 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham
$44 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Oakland
$36 each way to/from Burbank
$56 each way to/from Portland, OR
$40 each way to/from San Diego

Oklahoma City
$57 each way to/from Little Rock
$63 each way to/from Louisville
$57 each way to/from Lubbock
$57 each way to/from Midland/Odessa

Omaha
$61 each way to/from Cleveland
$54 each way to/from Nashville
$34 each way to/from St. Louis

Ontario, CA
$34 each way to/from Las Vegas
$36 each way to/from Sacramento

Orlando
$79 each way to/from Albany
$61 each way to/from Baltimore/Washington
$61 each way to/from Louisville

Phoenix
$92 each way to/from Kansas City
$34 each way to/from Los Angeles
$56 each way to/from Reno/Tahoe
$56 each way to/from San Jose

Portland, OR
$56 each way to/from Oakland
$44 each way to/from San Jose
$34 each way to/from Spokane

Providence
$66 each way to/from Chicago Midway
$67 each way to/from Nashville
$49 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Raleigh-Durham
$45 each way to/from Columbus
$50 each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale
$62 each way to/from Jackson, MS
$50 each way to/from Manchester
$62 each way to/from New Orleans
$49 each way to/from Providence
$41 each way to/from Tampa Bay

Reno/Tahoe
$36 each way to/from Boise
$36 each way to/from Las Vegas
$56 each way to/from Phoenix

Sacramento
$36 each way to/from Burbank
$47 each way to/from Las Vegas
$36 each way to/from Ontario, CA
$53 each way to/from Spokane

Salt Lake City
$48 each way to/from Los Angeles
$65 each way to/from Tucson

San Antonio
$62 each way to/from Amarillo
$36 each way to/from Dallas Love
$58 each way to/from El Paso

San Diego
$40 each way to/from Oakland
$40 each way to/from San Jose
$34 each way to/from Tucson

San Francisco
$51 each way to/from Las Vegas

San Jose
$63 each way to/from Boise
$36 each way to/from Los Angeles
$56 each way to/from Phoenix
$44 each way to/from Portland, OR
$40 each way to/from San Diego
$46 each way to/from Seattle

Seattle
$46 each way to/from San Jose

Spokane
$34 each way to/from Portland, OR
$53 each way to/from Sacramento

St. Louis
$34 each way to/from Kansas City
$34 each way to/from Omaha

Tampa Bay
$89 each way to/from Austin
$61 each way to/from Columbus
$34 each way to/from Jacksonville, FL
$61 each way to/from Louisville
$57 each way to/from Nashville
$44 each way to/from New Orleans
$41 each way to/from Raleigh-Durham

Tucson
$34 each way to/from Los Angeles
$65 each way to/from Salt Lake City
$34 each way to/from San Diego

Tulsa
$69 each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley
$56 each way to/from Houston Bush Intercontinental
$56 each way to/from Houston Hobby
$51 each way to/from Indianapolis
$58 each way to/from Jackson, MS

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials
Other Terms and Conditions:

Tickets must be purchased through the Southwest Airlines
web site at http://www.southwest.com The fares listed
above are per person for each way of travel. Click 'n Save
Internet Specials require roundtrip travel and an overnight
stay. Fares listed are for general information only and
are not a reflection of current seat availability. Travel
may originate in either direction. Roundtrip travel must
be between the same origin airport and the same destination
airport.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials may not be combined with
any other fares. Seats are limited and won't be available
on some flights that operate during very busy travel times
and holiday periods. Any change to the reservation (flights,
dates, cities, and/or names of passengers) once purchased
will result in a fare increase. Standby travel requires an
upgrade to the full unrestricted fare.

Of course, if your favorite city is not listed, we have many
other incredible fares to all Southwest cities. To find more
great fares on Southwest Airlines, please visit Ticketless
Travel Online or check our Fares Information online at
http://www.southwest.com

************************************************************
Try your luck in Las Vegas...Southwest Airlines Vacations
can take you there.  Just visit:
http://www.swavacations.com/index1.htm
today and book your next vacation package online.
Book your air, hotel accommodations and ground transportation
all at once, it's fast, easy and fun!
************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers1 as: [sshackl@ect.enron.com]
To unsubscribe, send email to
leave-special-offers1-97904730L@mail.southwest.com
or unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


Opps.  We do have to pay for the account.  I was afraid we were going to send
the big hunk of dough!

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/03/2001 12:31 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Escrow Agreement

I thought we had to wire $12,000 (give or take a little) somewhere.

Kay Mann
01/03/2001 12:09 PM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Escrow Agreement

WHOA.  We are not wiring money, we are receiving money.  This should occur
either Jan 12 or 15.

Minor detail.

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/03/2001 12:06 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Escrow Agreement

Citibank just confirmed that they will also accept faxed signatures on the
Escrow Agreement.  Have you approved it yet?  If so, and we let accounting
know to wire the funds to Citibank before 2:00, we can get the $ in the
Escrow Account by tomorrow.  Otherwise, the funds will not get there until
Friday.

K-


Hi Sara, Jim Nixon from Alcoa called me this morning.  He gave me the name of
his attorney.  It is Tom Seligson  (412) 553-4974.  Jim asked that you call
and talk to their attorney.  I told Jim if they wanted to use the ISDA
Agreement that the Agreement is under Alcoa Inc and not Alcoa Power
Generating Inc.  I don't think they understand.  Ed Sacks said it would be
fine with him if we changed the deal to Alcoa Inc.  I am not sure if Alcoa is
willing to do that.  If we cannot confirm this under the ISDA then they would
like the law changed to New York and they want to prohibit assignment of the
guarantee.  I told Jim that we could change the law and that we would
prohibit assignment of the guarantee for this transaction only.  That is when
he called me back and gave me the name if his attorney.

Here is the documents I sent them:

Let me know if you need me to do anything else.

Thanks,
Melissa
3-1886


Awaiting test results.  You know how that goes.  I give you details later.

I may go; I'll let you know.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/06/2001 09:02 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Deerfield Development Review Committee Hearing - June 11th

Are you going to this?  Isn't this in Florida?  What happened at the doctor?
Are you ok?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/06/2001 08:51 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Deerfield Development Review Committee Hearing - June 11th

fyi.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 08:50
AM ---------------------------
From: Steven Krimsky/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 08:47 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Thode/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven
Rose/ENRON@enronXgate, Dave Kellermeyer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Raimund Grube/ENRON@enronXgate, Lea
Sooter/ENRON@enronXgate, cabrera@pbworld.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
dsmith@edsaplan.com@SMTP@enronXgate, currog@bellsouth.net@SMTP@enronXgate,
gfhhai@msn.com@SMTP@enronXgate, bernardkinney@aol.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
kabainc@bellsouth.net@SMTP@enronXgate, redelstein@ensr.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
jessica@curtisrogers.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
charlotte@bitner.com@SMTP@enronXgate, sosbourne@ensr.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
amontero@edsaplan.com@SMTP@enronXgate,
walter.bertschinger@mcmtrans.com@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: Deerfield Development Review Committee Hearing - June 11th

Please plan to attend the hearing next Monday the 11th at 1:00 pm at
Deerfield Beach City Hall.; Should everything go well, this will be the only
public hearing in Deerfield.
;
We will be getting with each of you regarding presentational material, etc.
;
Also, please plan to attend a pre-meeting at;Keith & Associates Monday at
10:00 am.
;
Regards,
Steve


Eric, these are already in my list that I sent you.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/20/2000 10:53:15 AM
To: <eric.boyt@enron.com>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>

Subject: FW: Additional Information for GE Contract

Here are some additional info requests that I just sent to Kay Mann.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:    Thompson, Peter J.
> Sent:   Monday, November 20, 2000 11:40 AM
> To:   Kay Mann (E-mail)
> Subject:   Additional Information for GE Contract
>
> I also need the following information that I requested in my 11/17
> e-mail:
>
> 1.   Payee and Address for Invoices referenced in Section 6.7.2 of
> the Agreement
>
> 2.   Section 6.7.1 Agreement reference
>


I love Vincent's and it is close, so I say we go for it.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/10/2001 11:07 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

So, should I make reservations?  Is there somewhere else you'd rather go?
I'm starving!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/10/2001 10:54 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

I haven't talked to anyone.  I've got 10 docs going out this am, but I'm
almost finished.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/10/2001 10:46 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

Sheila can't go today because of work.  Carlos called, is he still going?
It's your birthday lunch, what do you want to do.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/10/2001 10:42 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

Sounds good, but if today isn't a good day, it is not a problem.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/10/2001 10:35 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: How about Vincent's for lunch?


Here is Staff's second set of data requests to Portland General Electric  Company in WordPerfect and Rich Text Formats.
 - datarequest 2 to Portland (rich).rtf
 - datarequest 2 to Portland.wpd


I need the WSS meter number.  I would like to get that from VNG.  I'm sure we
don't have that set up in our system.


We have unsuccessfully attempted to find sponsors for the project list you gave to me in our meeting.  I would therefore like to start the game again but starting from zero and working our way up. Assuming we are starting with no budget for IT development, please could you sit down with each of our Business Sponsors and agree a number with them.  They are:

Tim Belden (or his appointed person) for West Power
Lloyd Will for East Power
Geof Storey for Gas
Laura Luce for Peoples and Global Net
Chris Gaskill for Gas Fundys
Rob Milnthorp (or his appointed person) for Canada.
Mark Haedicke/Greenberg (or his appointed person) for Legal.

Each of the above will be allocated their charge for IT development and capital (apart from Geof who will allocate across the desks) and therefore is the best person/people to decide on the costs.  Please could you arrange a short meeting/discussion with each and agree a budget as the process so far is not working.

I am assuming its zero at the moment.

Thanks

Louise


There a  call-in number for this?


Start Date: 4/25/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


Is this an improvement over their previous counteroffer?

-----Original Message-----
From: Pavlou, Maria
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Harris, Steven; Donoho, Lindy; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Rapp, Bill
Cc: Miller, Mary Kay; Porter, J. Gregory
Subject: FW: SoCalGas Counter Offer
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential

SoCalGas' response came in last Friday night.  Let's discuss.  Thanks, Maria
-----Original Message-----
From: Healy, Gregory - TP1GMH [mailto:GHealy@Sempra.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 6:33 PM
To: Pavlou, Maria
Subject: SoCalGas Counter Offer
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential

<<SoCal Counter Offer to TWV31.doc>>

Maria-

Attached is SoCalGas' counter offer to Transwestern's previous offer relative to the RP01-620-000 proceeding. I will entrust that you will circulate to the proper staff on your side.

Please give me a call if you have any further questions.  Thanks.

Gregory Healy
Regulatory Case Administrator
Sempra Energy
PH:(213) 244-3314 Fax: (213) 244-8820
ghealy@sempra.com


I segmented the rest of our Tetco capacity this morning effective the 4th.
Please update your morning sheet with new AN52's.

Thanks


If it is your dad then ok but if I  see you face in an infomercial, I'm
going to be pissed

	Andrew Edison@ENRON
	01/22/2001 08:14 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Tuesday lunch

Unfortunately, lunch doesn't work for me tomorrow.  George Foreman is
speaking at the Houston Forum and I already promised my dad I would attend
with him.


Emma,

Thanks. Happy Holidays to you and your team.

I am a VP, Research  at Enron Corp.

Vince

"Emma Wolfin" <risk-ny@email.msn.com> on 12/16/99 09:03:16 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Invitation to speak at POWER 2000

Hi Vince

That's great - delighted you'll be participating. I've put you down as the
chairman for stream 1, day 1 on 9 May 2000.

By the way, is your job title still VP, Head of Research at Enron North
America? I need to know for the brochure.

If I don't speak to you before the new year, I wish you a very Merry Xmas
and a Happy New Millennium!

Emma

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
To: Emma Wolfin <risk-ny@email.msn.com>
Cc: Vince J Kaminski <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
Date: Thursday, December 16, 1999 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: Invitation to speak at POWER 2000

>
>
>Emma,
>
>Mergers and acquisitions are not my cup of tea.
>
>Chairing stream 1 on day 1 seems to be a better match.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>"Emma Wolfin" <risk-ny@email.msn.com> on 12/15/99 10:51:34 AM
>
>To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: Invitation to speak at POWER 2000
>
>
>
>
>Hi Vince
>
>Thanks for getting back to me quickly! As it happens, all of the sessions
>you suggested are already taken!
>
>So, would you be interested in chairing EITHER stream 1 on day 1 of the
>conference - "Pricing and Trading in the US Power Market"  OR stream 3 on
>day 2 of the conference - "Latest Developments in the US Energy Industry".
>For your information, the people presenting on day 1 in stream 1 include:
>
>- Spyros Maragos, Dynegy on volatility
>- Sanjeev Khanna, PG & E on correlation
>- Gary Morsches, Southern on optimising information to accurately price and
>trade electricity
>- Blake Johnson, Stanford University on modelling power prices
>- Craig Pirrong, Olin School of Business, Washington University on building
>the optimal forward curve
>
>On day 2, stream 3, there are only 3 talks in that stream, as after lunch
we
>will be breaking for plenary sessions and the Industry Briefing sessions
>too. But the people who will be speaking in that stream are:
>
>- Venu Nagali, Stanford University on real options
>- Ram Challa, Sithe Energies (he was formerly at Bankers Trust) on
>generation assets
>
>I have the slot on Mergers and Acquisitions in stream 3 on day 2 as still
>available but I'm not sure if that session is your area of speciality? Let
>me know.
>
>Thanks Vince and very much looking forward to working with you again.
>
>Emma
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Vince J Kaminski <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
>To: Emma Wolfin <risk-ny@email.msn.com>
>Cc: Vince J Kaminski <Vince_J_Kaminski@enron.com>
>Date: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 11:36 AM
>Subject: Re: Invitation to speak at POWER 2000
>
>
>>
>>
>>Emma,
>>
>>It's your choice. I can chair the session of day 2 or speak on one of
these
>>topics.
>>Please, let me know what works for you.
>>
>>Possible presentations:
>>
>>Evaluating the effectiveness of insurance as a risk management tool
>>
>>or
>>
>>Applying real option theory to value power plants
>>
>>or
>>
>>Overcoming the difficulties of accurately estimating volatility
>>
>>
>>Vince
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Emma Wolfin" <risk-ny@email.msn.com> on 12/14/99 04:08:03 PM
>>
>>To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
>>cc:
>>Subject:  Invitation to speak at POWER 2000
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi Vince
>>
>>It is my great pleasure to invite you to speak at POWER 2000 which will be
>>in Houston on 9 & 10 May 2000.
>>
>>Would you be interested in chairing one of the streams on day 2 of the
>>conference? Or making a full presentation on one of the days? Please let
me
>>know which talks interest you. Obviously, some of the talks are no longer
>>available but I would like to give you a choice as much as possible.
Please
>>could you get back to me asap on 212 925 1864 Ext 151 or by return email.
>>
>>I very much hope you can make the dates as I'm very keen to have you
>>participate at POWER. Not to flatter you unnecessarily, but I know that a
>>lot of people come to our conferences to hear what you have to say.
>>
>>Best regards
>>
>>Emma
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>


<title>COPY ANY DVD MOVIE</title>

COPY
    ANY DVD MOVIE!!

With our revolutionary software
    you can copy virtually

 any DVD Movie using your existing equipment!

Conventional
    DVD copying equipment can cost thousands of $$$

    Our revolutionary software cost less than the price of 3 DVD Movies!

    <big>CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO
    </big>

If you wish to be removed
simply  Click Here