Scouting Missouri

Texas hosts Missouri Saturday at 1:30 p.m. in a game that will not be
televised.
The Tigers have been an unpredictable team this year, playing Nebraska and
Michigan State tough, and getting blown out by Kansas last week.
Missouri opened the season with a 50-20 win over Western Illinois, lost to
Clemson, 62-9, then played Michigan State down to the wire before losing,
13-10. The Tigers played Nebraska tough the next week before losing, 42-24,
then whipped Oklahoma State, 24-10, and lost to Kansas, 38-17.
Longhorn coach Mack Brown said he watched part of the Nebraska-Missouri game
"and I thought they had a chance to beat Nebraska in Lincoln while I was
watching it."
TB Zain Gilmore, a 6-1, 222-pound junior is the Tigers' top rusher. He is
averaging 55.3 yards per game rushing and has scored six touchdowns.
Freshman QB Darius Outlaw, 6-4, 193, is filling in for injured starter Kirk
Farmer and has completed 38 of 76 passes for 489 yards and three touchdowns.
But he also has been picked off seven times.
Defensively, the Tigers are led by All-Big 12 DE Justin Smith, a 6-5,
265-pound terror.
Coach Larry Smith has five offensive and six defensive starters back from a
4-7 team a year ago.
This is a game the Longhorns will be favored to win by at least 15 points,
and it is one they should win handily if they come out ready to play.

Here's how the teams compare statistically (national rank in parenthesis):

Texas                               Missouri
Offense
(98)     93.3        Rushing Avg.          (78) 120.7
(12)   292.3         Passing Avg.          (58) 210.5
(45)   385.6        Total Off. Avg.        (79) 331.2
(18)   34.7              Scoring Avg           (71)   22.3

Defense
(19)   101.5         Rushing Avg.          (77) 162.7
(29)   181.8         Passing Avg.          (82) 224.8
(12)   283.3        Total Def. Avg.        (82) 387.5
(41)     20.2    Opp. Scoring Avg          (41)   30.8

Big 12 Roundup

Oklahoma showed it is ready to challenge for the top spot in the Big 12 last
week by going to Manhattan and handing No. 2 Kansas State a 41-31 whipping.
The Sooners are firmly in the driver's seat in the Big 12 Southern Division,
while top-ranked Nebraska and Kansas State will meet later this season to
determine the Northern Division champion.
Conventional wisdom holds that two league losses eliminate a team from
championship competition.
If that is the case, then half the teams in each division have already been
eliminated, leaving Oklahoma, Texas and Texas A&M as the teams in the
Southern Division with legitimate title hopes and top-ranked Nebraska, Kansas
State and Iowa State as the teams witha chance to win the Northern Division
championship.
At least one of the contenders will fall by the wayside this week when Texas
A&M travels to Ames to take on surprising Iowa State.
Other interesting games this week include Colorado at Kansas, Texas Tech at
Kansas State and Missouri at Texas.

BIG 12 STANDINGS

SOUTHERN DIVISION
Conference          Season
W   L   PF    PA     Pct.      W   L    PF     PA     Pct.
Oklahoma        3    0  138     51   1.000     6    0   280     86    1.000
Texas           2    1    84     84     .667     4    2   208    121      .667
Texas A&M       2    1    76     41     .667     4    2   186     85
.667
Texas Tech  1    2    46      89    .333     5    2   147    115      .714
Baylor          0    3    17      87    .000      2   4     74     141
.333
Okla State      0    2    17      66    .000     2    3    82     120
.400

NORTHERN DIVISION
Conference              Season
W   L   PF     PA      Pct.     W    L   PF    PA     Pct.
Nebraska        3    0  147     54     1.000    6   0   265 104   1.000
Kansas State    2    1  127     75       .667    6   1   339   102     .857
Iowa State      2    1    91      93      .667    5   1   177   143      .833
Missouri        1    2    65     90       .333    2   4  134    185     .333
Colorado        1    2    61     91       .333    1   5  113   153     .167
Kansas          1    2    67   103       .333    3   3  149   154     .500

Last Week's Results
Texas 28, Colorado 14
Texas A&M 24. Baylor 0
Oklahoma 41, Kansas State 31
Nebraska 56, Texas Tech 3
Kansas 38, Missouri 17
Iowa State 33, Oklahoma State 26

This Week's Games
Missouri at Texas, 1:30 p.m.
Colorado at Kansas, 11:30 a.m.
Baylor at Nebraska, 12:30 a.m.
Texas A&M at Iowa State, 1 p.m.
Texas Tech at Kansas State, 1:10 p.m.

2000 Longhorn Schedule, Record (4-2)
Texas  Opp.
Sept. 9     Louisiana-Lafayette     52  10
Sept 16    at Stanford              24  27
Sept 23    Houston                  48    0
Sept 30    Oklahoma State           42    7
Oct. 7       Oklahoma (Dallas)      14  63
Oct. 14    at Colorado              28  14
Oct. 21    Missouri
Oct. 28    Baylor
Nov. 4      at Texas Tech
Nov. 11    at Kansas
Nov. 24    Texas A&M

Scoring by Quarters
Texas         12     75   55         66 -  208
Opponents     30      42      35     14 -  121

Recruiting Roundup

There have been a lot of people who have been saying the disaster in Dallas
will damage UT recruiting.
But the week between the disaster and the victory over Colorado was one of
the best of this recruiting season for the Longhorns.
The Texas coaches got commitments last week from a great JC punter, the
state's best QB and one of the top DE/LB prospects in the country.
The latest Longhorn pledge is DE/LB Eric Hall  of Clarksville, Tenn. He
actually plays quarterback and safety at Clarksville, but Texas, Nebraska,
Tennessee and Texas A&M were all recruiting him primarily as a defensive end.
He said he picked Texas because he was born in Texas and has always had a
fondness for the state and for its state university. "I really enjoyed my
official visit to Texas," he said. "I just decided it was the place for me."
Hall was the 19th commitment for the Longhorns. who also had picked up
pledges last week from QB Matt Nordgren of Dallas Bishop Lynch and punter
Brian Bradford of  Trinity Valley JC.
Nordgren is easily the top pro-type passer in Texas and Bradford has been
rated as the nation's top JC punter by at least one recruiting service.
Nordgren  chose Texas over LSU, Tennessee and Colorado. He also was recruited
by most of the top programs, but had narrowed his choices to those four
schools. He told me had had 21 scholarship offers.
"It was really a close call between Texas and LSU," he said, "but I decided I
wanted to play for the Longhorns."
Nordgren is a 4.0 student who also is a 6-6 high-jumper and 39.5 intermediate
hurdler in track. He also starts for the basketball team.
&It came down to a great list of schools," Nordgren said, "but I felt at home
at the UT campus. It,s a football program that I know I can help lead to a
national championship."
Trinity Valley JC coach Chuck Langston says Bradford, "will punt in the NFL
someday. He's the best one I've ever been around."
Langston, who played and later coached at Oklahoma, said, "He's better than
any of the ones we ever had at OU when I was there. He averages better than
43 yards and he gets tremendous hang time, in the 4.7, 4.8, 4.9 (second)
range, which is really outstanding. He really gets great height and great
distance."
Langston said Bradford "is our team's MVP. He's one of the those guys who
turns the field over. He really changes field position."
Bradford told me he has "always wanted to play for the Longhorns." He was a
full qualifier out of Lufkin High School and said he will transfer to Texas
in January so he can go through spring training with the Longhorns.
Bradford can be counted against last year's class because he will enroll at
mid-year.
What I really like about Bradford is his emphasis on hang time. "I
concentrate on kicking it high," he said. "I'd rather have a 40-yarder with
no return than a 55-yarder that might be returned."
It obviously works out because he is averaging 43+ yards per kick, and still
getting close to five seconds hang time.
Here's a list of the Horns' 19 early commitments:
Offensive Line (7)
Jonathan Scott, 6-7, 290, 4.9, Dallas Carter
Abe Robinson, 6-6, 270, 4.9, Jersey Village
Alfio Randall, 6-6, 300, 5.1, Blinn JC
Mike Garcia, 6-5, 280, 5.2, Galena Park
Will Allen, 6-5, 300, 5.2, Cypress Falls
Roman Reeves, 6-6, 295, 5.2, Livingston
Terrance Young, 6-6, 340, 5.5, Longview
Quarterback (1)
Matt Nordgren, 6-5, 225, 4.6, Dallas B. Lynch
Running Back (2)
Cedric Benson, 5-11, 200, 4.5, Midland Lee
Anthony Johnson, 5-11, 195, 4.4, Jefferson
Defensive End (1)
Eric Hall, 6-2, 240, 4.5, Clarksville, Tenn.
Linebacker (2)
Yamil LeBron, 6-2, 240, 4.7, Killeen Ellison
Lance McFarland, 6-1, 225, 4.6, Jefferson
Defensive Back (5)
Cedric Griffin, 6-1, 180, 4.4, San Antonio Holmes
Aaron Ross, 6-1, 182, 4.42, Tyler
Kendal Briles, 5-10, 175, 4.5, Wolfforth Frenship
Braden Johnson, 6-2, 200, 4.5, Euless Trinity
Brian Carter, 5-11, 180, 4.5, The Woodlands
Punter (1)
Brian Bradford, 6-1, 205, Trinity Valley JC
* * * *
The Longhorns, with 19 commitments already, will give at least three more
and, if things fall right at the end, as many as six additional ones.
There are five players ) LB Derrick Johnson of Waco, S Dewayne Brandon of
Temple, DL Kaelen Jakes of Valencia, Cal., and DE Jonathan Jackson and TE
James Moses, both of Galena Park North Shore ) who strongly favor Texas.
But all of them are highly recruited national prospects and I would be mildly
surprised if the Horns signed all five of them.
Then there are four great players the Horns are still recruiting very hard )
DT Tommie Harris of Killeen Ellison, FB James Buchanon of Cardinal Mooney HS
in Sarasota, Fla., and OLs William Winston of Houston Madison and Jami
Hightower of Jacksonville.
Texas has a pretty good shot at Harris, but the other three are not leaning
UT's way at this time.
Harris had a great junior year. I saw him play and he was awesome. But he has
a sprained ankle that has hampered his performance this year.
When the ankle was well last summer, he ran a 4.78 40 weighing close to 270
pounds. He's still a super prospect and one the Horns need desperately.

UT Basketball Women Start Practice

The Texas women's basketball team  had its first practice Saturday, and
coach Jody Conradt said she is so pleased with her recruiting class that
three or four of the newcomers will challenge for starting jobs.
The Longhorns are coming off last year's 21-13 season, a second-place finish
in the 2000 Big 12 Conference Tournament, and the program's 16th trip to the
NCAA National Championship.
Fans can get an early courtside look at the Longhorns at the annual
Orange-White game (intrasquad scrimmage) on Thursday, Oct. 26, beginning at 7
p.m. at the Erwin Center. Admission is free to the Orange-White Game, and
there will be an opportunity to purchase season tickets during that scrimmage.
Texas will play a pair of pre-season exhibition games, hosting
Spartak-Moscow-Russia on Thursday, Nov. 2 at 7 p.m. before facing Delta
Kosice from the Slovakia Republic at 7 p.m. on Monday, Nov. 6. Both contests
will be at the Frank Erwin Center.
The Longhorns begin their regular season slate on Friday, Nov. 10  when they
host Wichita State in the first round of the Pre-season WNIT  Tournament in
Austin (7 p.m. tipoff).
The Pre-season WNIT is a 16-team, single-elimination tourney. If UT defeats
Wichita State, then the Longhorns will move into the WNIT second round on
Sunday, Nov. 12 to face the winner of the Tulane-Grambling State contest.
Season tickets and individual game tickets currently are available.  UT will
play a minimum of a 17-game home schedule, with more home  games dependent on
the Horns' advancement in WNIT Tournament play.
Reserved season tickets are priced at:  $108 per adult; $76 per senior
citizen, student or UT faculty/staff member; and  $54 for those holders on
the Longhorn All-Sports Package.
Longhorn  All-Sports Package holders have another option of drawing free
general admission tickets at the Erwin Center or at Bellmont Hall.  Single
game ticket prices range from $5-8.
For ticket purchase and  information, call UT Ticket Master at (512) 477-6060
or the UT  Athletic Ticket Office at (512) 471-333 or 1-800-982-BEVO. Tickets
also may be purchased in person at the UT Athletic Ticket Office on  the
ground floor of Bellmont Hall (west side of Memorial Stadium).

Eight Freshmen Have Played

Eight true freshmen Longhorn football players have played this year, and
three of them are starters.
Defensive end Kalen Thornton of Dallas St. Mark's has started the last three
games and wide receivers Roy Williams of Odessa Permian and B. J. Johnson of
South Grand Prairie were first-time starters Saturday in Colorado.
Other true freshmen who have played this year  are defensive tackle Stevie
Lee and safety Phillip Geiggar, both of Shreveport Evangel, wide receiver
Sloan Thomas of Klein, tight end Brock Edwards of Fort Worth Christian and
cornerback Nathan Vasher of Texarkana.

Men Hold First Practices

The University of Texas men's basketball team opened practice sessions for
the 2000-2001 season Saturday.
Texas starts its season with the annual intrasquad scrimmage at 7 p.m. on
Wednesday, Nov. 1, at Gregory Gym.  The Longhorns get their first action
against outside opponents when they host Australia Team EZY at 7 p.m.
Sunday, Nov. 5, at the Erwin Center.  The Longhorns conclude their exhibition
schedule with a contest against EASports California All-Stars at 7 p.m.
Wednesday, Nov. 8 at the Erwin Center.
Texas opens the 2000-01 regular season with a home game against Navy on
Monday, Nov. 13. in the opening round of the Pre-season NIT.  Tip-off for
theNavy contest is set for 7 p.m. at the Erwin Center. The game will
betelevised by UT's statewide syndicated network, with KVC Channel 13 in
Austinand KDFI Channel 39 in Dallas slated to broadcast the contest.
For season ticket information, please call 800-982-BEVO, or for individual
game tickets call 512-477-6060.
A True Orange Subscription Is
The Gift You Can Get Every
Year for Your Longhorn Friends
A subscription to True Orange is the perfect gift for any occasion for a
Longhorn who has everything else. It's only $45  ($35 by e-mail) and I'll
send  an attractive card announcing your thoughtful gift.
The only thing better is  a gift of  True Orange and the True Orange Fax  )
and you can give both for just $130 a year ($99 if they take both by e-mail).

o  I am enclosing $45 for a gift subscription ($35 e-mail)
o  I am enclosing $130 for a gift subscription to the newsletter and the fax
($99 e-mail)

Name of Recipient

Address (& fax no., if applicable)

City, State, Zip

Your Name

Any Message You Want on Card

Next Issue October 23

The next issue will be e-mailed on October 23 and will report on Missouri
game, preview the home game the following week against Baylor and take a look
at the Big 12 championship races.
As usual, I'll have a lot of recruiting news, reports on men's and women's
basketball and lots of other stories on the Longhorns' teams in the various
sports.

SUBSCRIPTION COUPONS

I want to subscribe. I am enclosing $45 for the next year, which will include
26 issues.  A two-year subscription is $85. For a one-year subscription via
E-Mail, send $35.

Name

Street Address or Box Number or E-Mail Address

City, State and Zip Code
Remit to True Orange, P O Box 26530, Austin, TX 78755
Foreign Rates Available on Request.    Phone  512-795-8536
E-Mail Address: truorange@aol.com

I want to give a gift subscription to  True Orange. I am enclosing $45. Pleas
e send an appropriate gift card. For a gift subscription via E-Mail, send $35.

Name of Person Receiving Gift

Street Address or Box Number or E-Mail Address

City, State and Zip Code

Your Name


Sami - apologies for not getting back to you - it's been a crazy week or
two.  Can we talk early next week?

	Sami Arap@ENRON
	10/24/2000 12:55 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Colombian deals

---------------------- Forwarded by Sami Arap/SA/Enron on 10/24/2000 02:56 PM
---------------------------

Sami Arap
10/18/2000 05:43 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Colombian deals

Mark;

As per Randy Young's request, I need to discuss the trading deals in Brazil,
Colombia and Venezuela asap.  Please let me know if you will be available
tomorrow or Friday.

Tks,

Sami

---------------------- Forwarded by Sami Arap/SA/Enron on 10/18/2000 05:43 PM
---------------------------

Pedro Fernando Manrique@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/18/2000 11:38 AM
To: Sami Arap/SA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ignacio Taveras/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Colombian deals

Sami,

Estoy preparando un paquete completo, una vez lo tenga listo te lo envio. Sin
embargo los deals que tenemos son:

Exportaci?n a Cadafe (Venezuela) con un back-to-back con EBSA (Empresa de
Energ?a de Boyaca)
Emcali-Enron-Chivor, intermediaci?n de credito con una opci?n adicional de 10
GWh-mes
Compra a ISAGEN de 15 GWh-mes 50% Take or Pay and 50% Take and Pay.
Alianza con Chivor para el mercado no regulado.

Los m?s urgentes son la Venta a Emcali y la Compra a ISAGEN, sin embargo los
terminos de las ofertas de EBSA para la venta a Cadafe se vencen el 28 de
Octubre y tenemos que definir algo al respecto. En el curso del d?a te
estamos enviado copia de todas las ofertas y documentos preparados. Ayer
estuvimos reunidos con Clara Ines Guarin, socia de Figueroa Sierra Asociados
revisando el contrato borrador de Emcali-Chivor.

Cualquier duda o pregunta por favor no dudes en dejarmelo saber.

Gracias,

PFM

Sami Arap@ENRON
10/17/2000 04:04 PM
To: Pedro Fernando Manrique/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Susana Camacho/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Colombian deals

Pedro;

Me pod,s mandar copia de los e-mails y materiales/documentos con respecto a
las transacciones que Uds estan buscando negociar en Colombia ?!

Gracias y un abrazo,

Sami


Amy,

I have forward this to Sean Crandall to help you settle.  I will be out of the office for the balance of the year.

Thanks,

Diana Scholtes

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clemons, Amy
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 12:31 PM
To:	Scholtes, Diana; Rosman, Stewart
Cc:	Purcell, Mike
Subject:	City of Shasta Lake

Diana & Stewart

I am hoping one of you can help me.  I am trying to send aninvoice out to City of Shasta Lake, but there is a deal we don't show in view actuals,or CARP, etc. so it's not part of the numbers I have to invoice then on - but they say they owe it to us.  It is the transmission capacity deal #839722.1 for City of Shasta Lake.  They see they owe us for this deal in the amount of $36,600.  Stewart, I had faxed you the confirm on #659898.1. It was a Laird Dyer deal and you were going to see if you could find out how we would settle it.  I am not sure if the two deals are related, but maybe they are?  Could the two of you look into these and let me know.  I need to invoice them with deal #839722.1, and I also need to know if we need to do anything for deal #659898.1.  Let me know.

Thanks - Amy


Go for it!

Rhonda L Denton
02/23/2001 01:16 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal No. 529589

I'm going to change this deal to TransAlta (US) if its okay with you.


----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/04/2000 12:18 PM
-----

	djcustomclips@djinteractive.com
	09/28/2000 01:19 PM
	Please respond to nobody

		 To: 86464@WCTOPICS.djnr.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: PG&E moves to end rate freeze by
2002

PGOmoves to end rate freeze by 2002
?
09/25/2000
The Energy Report
(c) Copyright 2000 Pasha Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) plans to raise additional capital to offset
the mounting costs of wholesale energy in the California market and complete
the divestiture of its generation assets, allowing it to charge its retail
customers market rates, according to filings the company has made at the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

In an 8-K filing, PGOCorp. told the SEC that its utility subsidiary may issue
long-term debt to finance the high costs of wholesale electricity that
plagued California's deregulated market this summer. In addition, PGOfiled an
application with the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) on Sept. 8
requesting the authority to raise an additional $1.4 billion in short-term
financing, it told the SEC. This would be in addition to $1.7 billion in
short-term financing that the PUC has allowed PGOto raise, as well as an
existing $1 billion revolving credit facility the company has used to support
commercial paper issuance.

Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 97

______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow
Jones Customer  Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.comor by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and  Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


Beginning at noon today, Mark Taylor will be out of the office.  He will return to work on Monday, October 22.  Numbers to reach him are as follows:

pager number: 			877-855-2081
email a message to his pager: 	8778552081@pagenetmessage.net
cellular:				713-206-8080

If I can be of assistance, please call.

Thank you,

Holly Keiser
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Phone: 713-345-7893
Fax: 713-646-3490
Location: EB 3887
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


Please Mark your calendar.....

The ENA Gas and Power Technical and Commercial Support Performance Review Meeting will be tentatively held on June 21, 2001.  Details to follow.


Ron:
It looks like Jane has not received these questions.  Let me know where they
are in terms of being answered.  Thanks!
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
12:01 PM ---------------------------

"Jane Kravcik Murphy" <jkmurphy@JonesDay.com> on 10/30/2000 11:54:05 AM
To: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com
cc: tirwin@alleghenyenergy.com, jhammer@alleghenyenergy.com,
jlapcev@alleghenyenergy.com, "William F Henze" <wfhenze@JonesDay.com>,
"Michael F. Dolan" <mfdolan@JonesDay.com>, "Michael C. Gibbs"
<mgibbs@JonesDay.com>
Subject: Re: Outstanding Allegheny Environmental Questions

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

Thanks for the response.  We had previously received the response regarding
the SPCC plan issue but I had not seen the responses for the Lincoln
facility (although I had received Gleason last week).  Just to confirm what
is outstanding:  The questions relating to all facilities sent on 10/23,
the questions relating to Wheatland sent on 10/23, the questions relating
to LV Cogen I and II sent on 10/23, and the questions relating to the LV
Cogen I and II schedules sent on 10/25.  Please let me know if this is not
consistent with your understanding of what is outstanding.  Thanks.

P.S.  You had also indicated in your 10/25 email that the letter from TDEC
regarding the Subpart GG variance would be faxed to me.  To date, I have
not yet received it.  Thanks.

Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com on 10/30/2000 11:34:03 AM
Extension:

To:   jkmurphy@JonesDay.com
cc:   Don.Miller@enron.com
Subject:  Re: Outstanding Allegheny Environmental Questions

Jane:
I believe we have already sent you the answers to these questions.  They
were sent to Tom Irwin.  Here are some of them again.  The rest of the
answers for the peakers will follow shortly - we are cleaning them up a
little.
Ben

(See attached file: Allegheny Question and Answers - All Facilities 3rd
Batch.doc)

(See attached file: Allegheny Question and Answers - Lincoln version2.doc)
(See attached file: Allegheny Question and Answers - All Facilities 3rd
Batch.doc)
(See attached file: Allegheny Question and Answers - Lincoln version2.doc)

 - Allegheny Question and Answers - All Facilities 3rd Batch.doc
 - Allegheny Question and Answers - Lincoln version2.doc


Start Date: 2/3/02; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020305.txt


Any chance we could look at the US$/Euro rates in addition to the US$/C$ rates to see whether there's a strong correllation for use in the forecasting model?  Thanks.

KC


Ron,

I am sorry to inform you that due to a scheduling conflict I cannot speak at
this conference.
I want to thank you for considering me as a speaker.

Vince Kaminski

"Ron Henderson" <ronh@informationforecast.com> on 12/30/99 06:57:05 PM
Please respond to ronh@informationforecast.com
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Invitation to Speak at Infocast's upcoming "Market Price Volatility"
program

Hi Vince,

I would like to invite you, or one of your staff, to be a speaker at
Infocast's upcoming conference "Market Price Volatility: How to Model,
Assess, and Manage Price Volatility in Today's Power Markets," scheduled for
May 10-12, 2000, in Chicago.  I am attaching a copy of the draft program
agenda for your review.  As you may note, we wish to take our recent Houston
meeting a step farther by making this next session a more
technically-oriented meeting.

There are two spots you may wish to consider:

1. The session entitled "Case Study in Modeling Volatility," scheduled for
Wednesday, May 10th, from 3:30 to 5:00 pm.  You will note below, what we had
in mind for the case study.
2. The talk "A Real Options Approach to Asset Valuation," scheduled for
Thursday, May 11th, from 10:30 am to 12:00 pm.

I am running behind schedule in finalizing this program, so I will give you
a call shortly to follow up with you.  If you wish, please feel free to call
me at 818-888-4445 ext. 28.

I hope you can join us.

Ron Henderson
Infocast
818-888-4445 ext. 28
ronh@informationforecast.com

CASE STUDY GUIDELINES
1. Model should be for a particular market. Examples: PJM, Chicago, ECAR,
Southern California.

1B (optional). Model should be for a particular purpose. Examples: valuing a
new combustion turbine at the Florida/Georgia border, bidding on a portfolio
of power plants up for sale in NEPOOL, valuing a retail portfolio in
Pennsylvania.
2. Model should be estimated on a particular data set. Examples: daily NYMEX
close prices for Palo Verde, PJM hourly spot prices for 1998-1999.
3. Case study should describe several candidate models, for volatility
and/or market price, that were considered. Case study should discuss why
these models were considered. Candidate models should be described
mathematically and verbally.
4. Evaluation criteria for choosing among the models should be explicitly
identified, and quantified to the extent possible. Examples of evaluation
criteria: residuals that are not autorcorrelated, stationarity, R-squared,
Akaike information criterion.
5. Parameter estimates for each candidate model should be displayed. The
estimation procedure employed should be briefly described.
6. Some diagnostics of model fit (vis-a-vis data set) should be presented.
7. If possible, predictive power of model should be assessed.

Generally, the case study should include all of the items above. The case
study may include other things.

 - Draft Agenda v.2.doc


Effective 04/1/2000, Columbia Gas Transmission will be transferring certain
facilities to Gatherco, Inc.  There should have been a message in Columbia
Navigator stating that there were certain meters that were going out of your
IPP pool 37147 effective 4/2000.  The subject for this e-mail message was
"Appalachian Meter Allocation".  The meters listed in this e-mail will now be
on Gatherco's gathering lines and are going to be subject to the $.25
gathering rate.  Per Dave Fusek at Gatherco, our final estimates for 04/2000
SHOULD reflect these meters that were changed from Columbia Gas Transmission
to Gatherco.  He said he is not 100% positive that they will get this
finished in time, but they are hoping to have everything complete by the time
they release our nominations.

Gloria and Wade,

You will need to make sure you have the correct charges associated with these
meters.  Some of these meters were previously subject to Columbia's $.27
gathering and some were straight transmission, which did not have any
gathering.  Again, these meters will now have a $.25 gathering charge.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Heidi Griffith


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/28/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	5,219
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,858
Total Life to Date Transactions	474,044

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/28/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	4,590	77%
Enron Europe Limited	186	35%
Global Products	204	35%
Enron Metals	239	13%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	52%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	3,909,144,111
MTD	56,951,635,370
LTD	270,380,339,786
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,721,718,263

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	18,394,732,074

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	580
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,163
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,177
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,835


Brant:

I haven't heard of anyone pushing this internally but there are serious
issues here because of the "agency" relationship that Energy New England has
with various municipals.  You want the municipals on the dotted line and not
the agent.

How do you want to handle?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001 02:01 PM -----

	Susan Bailey
	02/09/2001 08:17 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RESPONSE TO ENRON DRAFT ISDA

Sara,

Set forth below and attached are Mr. Delani's comments to our ISDA draft for
Energy New England.  Please advise if I may be of further assistance.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001 08:20 AM -----

	Jimdelani@aol.com
	02/08/2001 05:48 PM

		 To: Susan.Bailey@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RESPONSE TO ENRON DRAFT ISDA

Susan;

Leo Swift, our chief financial officer, requested
that I review the Draft ISDA you transmitted to
him and send you our comments.

I have prepared them in letter form [ attached ].
Please review at you convenience and let me know
if you would like additional information or clarification.

I work flex hours and can be reached at the office
in Foxborough or at 781-272-7262 Fax 781-272-7197.

Thanks
Jim Delani
Energy New England

 - Enron_Feb_ISDA_ltr.doc


Done.  Both called.  Susan will be in tomorrow and report to Jim Steffes.  Charles expressed some concern and will call Jim tomorrow to discuss role.

R-

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:23 PM
To:	Jones, Robert W.- HR Exec
Subject:	FW: NEWCO Regulatory List

Please get those two people back.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kean, Steven J.
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Linnell, Elizabeth
Subject:	RE: NEWCO Regulatory List

Charles Yeung and Susan Lindberg were not on your list yesterday and so they were let go.  Call me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:23 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	NEWCO Regulatory List

Regulatory

S. Montovano - E. Gas
J. Dosovich - W. Gas
C. Nicolay - FERC
Alan Comnes	West Power
S. Walton - E. Power
J Steffes
Charles Yeung	ERCOT
Susan Lindberg
Sarah Novosel	FERC

Are all of these people still here?  We obviously hope so, as we would like them for NEWCO


E-mail has been a bit problematic here, so I hope the third time will be
lucky on this.  I attach an agenda, minutes and a copy of the standard sale
and purchase contract we've been shopping around here.

Mike


Given the fact that we still have a significant number of transactions that are not captured on EOL, my answer would be thanks but no thanks.

AZ
-----Original Message-----
From: R. Martin Chavez [mailto:martin.chavez@kiodex.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:42 PM
To: Piper, Greg
Cc: Zipper, Andy; Webb, Jay; Raj Mahajan; Thomas Farley; Sean Maloney;
Raj Vaswani
Subject: Independent Kiodex analysis of EnronOnline risk?

Greg, we've been able to load thousands of EnronOnline trades into our Risk
Workbench, and we've correctly run risk reports on them.  Might we be of
service to Enron by loading ALL the EnronOnline trades into the Risk
Workbench, and running our risk reports on the aggregate?  I'm thinking that
such an independent analysis of at least part of Enron's risk position might
answer the requests, expressed among analysts and pundits in the FT, the
WSJ, and elsewhere, for greater disclosure.

Everyone is excessively worried about mysterious packages these days.  Just
as Enron pioneered transparency in the energy markets, Enron can set the
gold standard for disclosure of aggregate risk.  (I know the other dealers
will want to squirm their way out of following suit.)  I have supreme
confidence in Enron's risk controls, and I'm thinking that an independent
measurement of this kind could dispel the market's overblown and baseless
fears.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Kind regards
Marty

R. Martin Chavez
Chief Executive Officer
Kiodex, Inc.
+1 877 6 KIODEX
+1 646 437 3811   direct
+1 646 437 3832   fax
+1 917 294 6080   mobile
www.kiodex.com

Disclaimer: This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive this e-mail for the recipient), please
note that review, use, distribution or disclosure of any part of this e-mail
is strictly prohibited, except that you should please contact the sender or
notify Kiodex, Inc. at notices@kiodex.com that you have received this
message in error, and delete all copies of the message.  This e-mail and any
attachments hereto are the property of Kiodex, Inc. and/or its relevant
affiliate, and are not intended to be an offer or an acceptance, and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Kiodex, Inc.
or any of its affiliates and the intended recipient or any other party, and
may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
otherwise.


Ashley,

This is one resume I got today. I think that it makes sense to invite him
for an interview directly with my group. He does not qualify as an analyst
candidate.
What do you think?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------

Rajnish Kamat <kamat@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/23/2000 07:55:31 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student

Dr. Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director and Head of Research
Enron Corp.

Dear Dr. Kaminski,
It was a pleasure talking with you and attending your talk today.
I am a graduate student in Industrial Engg. and Operations
Research working with Prof. Shmuel Oren
on topics in financial instrument pricing and design of
contracts in deregulated electricity markets. I am also
doing research in auction models and computable equilibrium
models with applications in electricity market design.

I am planning to graduate with a Ph.D. in May 2001 and would
appreciate hearing about any opportunities in your group at Enron.
I am attaching at copy of my resume (file: cvrkamat.doc) for your perusal.

Thanking you,
Sincerely,

Rajnish Kamat
Graduate Student
IEOR, UC-Berkeley

4135, Etcheverry Hall
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, CA, 94710

 - CVRKAMAT.DOC


Dan,

An EFO is a result of parties not complying with an OFO after multiple
notices.  PG&E can confiscate gas if a scheduling party is not in
compliance.  The same rules apply to an EFO as an OFO.  EFO stands for
Emergency flow order.

Thanks,

Kim

Dan J Hyvl
04/04/2001 04:31 PM
To: "Kolling, Grant" <grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>, Kim
Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement

Grant,
 I have removed the red-line from the above document.  If it is in order,
please print 2 originals, have them signed, and forward to me for signature
by Enron.  I will attach a list of current traders who might be available to
handle a trade with Palo Alto, and I will also have  a certificate of
incumbency attached for the officer signing in behalf of Enron, and return a
fully executed contract for your files.
 Regarding the OFO language, usually the pipeline notifies its customers of
the OFO event and leave it to those customers to notify their parties.
Therefore, if Enron is scheduling gas into your transport contract and your
transporter declares an OFO, you will get notice and be responsible for
giving that notice to Enron after which time Enron would be responsible for
its actions that were not in accord with the OFO notification.  Likewise, if
Enron receives notification from its transporter and notified Palo Alto and
Palo Alto failed to adjust its actions in compliance with the OFO
notification, Palo Alto would be responsible for the consequences of such
failure.  Usually, the OFO notification would require that the parties make
their receipts and deliveries balance in accordance with their scheduled
volumes.    I am not familiar with the concept of EFO, but do not think that
the OFO provisions apply.  Please advise as to what is meant by EFO so that I
can verify with the transport group.


The following meetings have been arranged for Monday, June 26.  I am hoping
to schedule a couple more with Senate Banking Committee and Congressman
Dooley's office.
It would be best for all of you to meet at the Enron Washington Offfice at
11:00 AM Monday morning.
1775 Eye Street, NW
Suite 800

If you have any questions Chris can be reached at home this weekend at
703-671-1796

1:00 PM Ryan Weston
  House Agriculture Committee
  1301 Longworth
  202-225-2171

2:30 PM Shawn Pfaff
  Office of Congressman Pomeroy
  1533 Longworth House Office Building
  202-225-2611

3:00 PM David Kay
  Office of Congressman Chris John
  1504 Longworth
  202-225-2031

5:00 PM Steve Ganis
  House Banking Committee
  2129 Rayburn House Office Building
  202-225-7502


Got some great news today! I'll call you tonight.


Kim asked me to send the attached spreadsheet to you.  It's my listing of TW's firm contracts where I track ROFR.  This is a complete list as of 9-17-01 of all long-term contracts (seasonal or longer).  Any monthly deals may not be included.  Dennis Lee has a report he runs from CBS of all currently effective contracts and contracts with future effective dates for me to cross-check that I have everything.

The first tab "ROFR Criteria" is a complete list of currently effective contracts including (at the bottom) contracts with future effective dates and the Red Rock Expansion contracts.  The receipt and delivery areas are noted.  The tabs following show the subscribed capacity for certain segments of TW's pipe (West of Thoreau, Blanco to Thoreau & Ignacio to Blanco) by month through 2006.


like you read about!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Britt, Michael J" <Michael.Britt@Constellaion.Com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Britt+2C+20Michael+20J+22+20+3CMichael+2EBritt+40Constellaion+2ECom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:10 AM
To:	'mcarson2@enron.com'
Subject:	Mike Carson plays with dolls


Mary,

No I did not receive it but I am not surprised since I did not receive other
emails.  The solutions team had been in the process of reinstalling my
applications to a another laptop and somehow my emails were affected.  Please
forward it to me again.

Thank you so much,

Nancy

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Hain, Mary
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:57 PM
To: Morales, Nancy
Subject: Re: Wheeling Agreement

I E-mailed it to you.  Didn't you get it.?

From: Nancy Morales/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 02:20 PM CST
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Wheeling Agreement

Dear Mary,

I spoke to you last week with regards to a sample wheeling agreement our team
needed.  Please let me know if you need me to supply any information.  I look
forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Nancy


- bl554888.DOC
 - Bl554886.doc


Fundamentals of Corporate Finance - May 24 & 25, 2001
in EB552   Cost:  $700.00

Do need to improve your understanding of Financial Statements?

Do you want to learn how Financial Statements disclosure is linked to Enron
activities?

Are you interested in learning about analysis of projections or
Improving your understanding of ratio analysis?

If your answer is yes, then this class is for you.

For registration, please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website,
http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at 713 853-3057.


Attached please find the interview schedule, resume, and evaluation form for
Iris Mack.  Iris will be interviewing on December 28, 2000.  Please contact
me with any comments or concerns.

Thank you,
Cheryl Arguijo
EWS Staffing
713-345-4016


Mike -

While one paragraph states that normal destruction policies are suspended it states in the next paragraph to retain only ones related LJM.  My interpretation is "preserve anything to do with LJM and if you are unsure preserve anything you think is related to LJM until you can verify".

Jim - This is an inquiry from our New York trading office.

Thanks
Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: Cilento, Michael
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 6:26 AM
To: Smith, Bruce
Cc: Nissan, Limor; Parra, Marcelo
Subject: Fw: Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation

Bruce
   How does this apply to us ?  Should I stop rotating data and voice recording tapes ?
Thanks
Mike
Mike Cilento
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim.Derrick@enron.com <Jim.Derrick@enron.com>
To: All.Enron.Worldwide@enron.com <All.Enron.Worldwide@enron.com>
Sent: Thu Oct 25 23:54:55 2001
Subject: Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation

As you know, Enron, its directors, and certain current and former officers
are defendants in litigation in Federal and State court involving the LJM
partnerships.

Enron has employed counsel and they will represent Enron and its interests
in the litigation.

Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, we are required to
preserve documents that might be used in the litigation.

Accordingly, our normal document destruction policies are suspended
immediately and shall remain suspended until further notice.

Please retain all documents (which include handwritten notes, recordings,
e-mails, and any other method of information recording) that in any way
relate to the Company's related party transactions with LJM 1 and LJM 2,
including, but not limited to, the formation of these partnerships, any
transactions or discussions with the partnerships or its agents, and
Enron's accounting for these transactions.

You should know that this document preservation requirement is a
requirement of Federal law and you could be individually liable for civil
and criminal penalties if you fail to follow these instructions.

You should know that Enron will defend these lawsuits vigorously.  In the
meantime, you should not discuss matters related to the lawsuits with
anyone other than the appropriate persons at Enron and its counsel.

If you have any questions, please contact Jim Derrick at 713-853-5550.


I believe this was intended for the other Susan Scott...I'm with Nat Gas trading.

Thanks

From:	Ramona Betancourt/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/17/2001 11:15 AM
To:	Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerry Medeles/ENRON@enronXgate, Terry Kowalke/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Neville/ENRON@enronXgate, TK Lohman/ENRON@enronxgate
Subject:	RE: PNR questions

Mike,

I see in your emails below that you are indicating that the allocation process does not comply with the tariff. The allocation process I do not think is the problem. It is the way the rates are used today for PNR. Today, the only rates I think that are loaded in CBS are the posted rates and the tariff rates. If you want the rate to carry through at the contract level for the range of dates of the specific deal, then the rates must be loaded that way in CBS for each PNR deal that is granted prior to the timely allocation process. If the allocation does not find a contract specific rate, then it looks for the next level which is your posted rates, if no posted rates are found, then it looks for tariff rates on PNR. It sounds like to me that TW will need to implement specific deal sheets and calculate the specific rates for each deal sheet on a daily basis & load the total specific contract deal rate in CBS.  Please let me know if there are other problems in the allocation process itself.

Thanks Ramona
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bodnar, Michael
Sent:	Monday, April 16, 2001 2:28 PM
To:	Betancourt, Ramona ; Medeles, Gerry; Kowalke, Terry
Cc:	Nacey, Sheila; Blair, Lynn
Subject:	RE: PNR questions

Regarding my meeting invitation..............I hope this helps.

I've had a series of e-mails with Marketing, Legal and Regulatory regarding TW PNR in an effort to finalize the process and procedures. As a result, I've learned that TW's allocation process does not comply with the tariff. (See below) Marketing wants to continue with current practices, but changes are required for the allocation process.

----------------- Forwarded by Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron on 04/16/2001 01:33 PM ---------------------------
From:	Sue Neville/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/10/2001 03:57 PM
To:	Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate
cc:	Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gerry Medeles/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	RE: PNR questions

Mike,

I recommend that we continue to use the current practices we are using now of charging the PNR rate posted on the day service begins.  I also recommend that we continue our current practice of  using the nomination process and posted rates for PNR service.   In the future, we may choose to change those practices to one of the methods you recommended below.  It is helpful to know that that would require system changes and new language on the postings to accommodate any new change of that sort.

Thanks for your help on this.

Sue

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bodnar, Michael
Sent:	Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:13 PM
To:	Neville, Sue; Hyatt, Kevin
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Nacey, Sheila; Medeles, Gerry; Scott, Susan
Subject:	PNR questions

Sue & Kevin,

I need some help from you..............
Based on the response from Susan Scott and Glen Hass (below),

Should TW continue the practice of charging the PNR rate posted on the day service begins or charge the rate posted daily? (Using the latter, TW's posted rates would include the text Susan provides below)

Should TW continue to use the nomination process and posted rates for PNR service or revert back to entering into individual purchase orders for each deal?
The individual purchase orders are not as convenient , but they provide better clarity between the parties.

TW's allocation program uses the posted and/or deal rates entered into CBS when capacity is allocated. It  does not calculate ..."the greatest total cost commitment". System modifications are needed to determine which shipper has the greatest cost commitment.

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron on 04/04/2001 10:17 AM ---------------------------
From:	Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/08/2001 03:52 PM
To:	Michael Bodnar/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sue Neville/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject:	PNR questions

You asked:

	1.  For a customer keeping a PNR balance for several days, is it acceptable to charge whatever is the posted rate for each of those days, or should TW charge the rate in effect on the first day of the balance?

	Answer:  The tariff doesn't say.  I believe this is a business decision.  Would we rather charge the same rate every day, or are both parties OK with taking the risk that it will go up or down from day to day?  My understanding is that we presently charge the same rate that was in effect on the same day.  I also understand that, rather than documenting the rate in a contract or other writing, we rely on our posting.  If we change our practice and start charging the posted rate applicable to each rate, I recommend at a minimum that we notify our customers in a posting.  From a legal standpoint I also have to recommend that the rate be documented in a deal sheet, e-mail or other writing.  While we may be indifferent (after all, Form M says the max rate applies in absence of an agreement to the contrary), documentation of the actual rate could save us hassle if a conflict arises.

	Another thing:  There is nothing to keep us from charging some shippers the posted rate on the first day for the entire term of the balance, and other shippers the posted rate from day to day.  However, there can be no discrepancy among similarly situated shippers.  To avoid the appearance of discrimination, I'd recommend choosing one method or the other, if that is feasible from a business standpoint.

	Assuming you are going to use the day to day approach for all shippers, here are my recommendations:

	My recommended language to include on the rate posting webpage would be something to this effect:  BALANCES CARRIED FORWARD FROM DAY TO DAY SHALL BE CHARGED THE RATES APPLICABLE TO EACH DAY OF THE BALANCE.  (If this looks awkward to you let's discuss a better way to say it.)

	I recognize PNR deals happen within minutes.  However, if it is possible to do an e-mail or fax, it could read:  The rate applicable to Contract No. ______ on each day that quantities are parked or ridden shall be the rate posted on Transwestern's website for that day.  Another option might be just to include this language as an attachment to the master agreement; it would not have to be done for each deal.

2.  If we have the following situation:  Shipper A has parked 10,000 dth for a week and wants to move it out; Shipper B wants to ride 10,000 dth; we can only accommodate schedule activity totaling 10,000 dth -- who gets priority?

	Answer:  Shipper A should have priority because it has the greatest total cost commitment to TW in accordance with Sheet 37E of the tariff.


Steve,
Here is the response from EES to confirm their staff increases, particularly
the increase of admins of 146 which is roughly 38% of total increase of 389
for year 2000.
Thanks.
 -----Original Message-----
From:  James, Ron
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 7:37 AM
To: Brown, Suzanne
Subject: Re: EES Net Growth - pls verify- need back AM tomorrow-Thanks.

Note Kalen's general comment plus the IPT aquisition added over 100 in
October.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ron James/HOU/EES on 05/17/2001 07:34 AM
---------------------------

Kalen Pieper
05/16/2001 08:19 PM
To: Ron James/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: EES Net Growth - pls verify- need back AM tomorrow-Thanks.

we were growing our business, doubled our expected return to the company, I
think that is enough!

---------------------- Forwarded by Ron James/HOU/EES on 05/15/2001 04:22 PM
---------------------------
From: Suzanne Brown/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/15/2001 04:17 PM
To: Ron James/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Kalen Pieper/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: EES Net Growth - pls verify- need back AM tomorrow-Thanks.

Ron,

HEre's what we see in the DataMart as the largest headcount changes for EES
2000.  Please confirm and validate or provide valid business reasons. thanks.

2000 Net Growth    EES (third column-disregard first two)

COMMERCIAL	ACCT MNGT.	0	0	49
COMMERCIAL	RISK MNGT. - RETAIL	0	0	42
COMM. SUPPORT	ACCOUNTING	15	5	54
COMM. SUPPORT	ADMIN. ASST./CLER.	31	36	146
COMM. SUPPORT	DIRECT SALES SUPPORT	-2	24	86
COMM. SUPPORT	TRANSACTION SUPPORT	4	7	80

TECHNICAL	ENGINEERING	0	1	140
TECHNICAL	OPERATIONS	-1	0	169
TECHNICAL	TECH OPERATIONS SUPPORT	-1	70	118

The technical areas appear to be from NEPCO - does that sound right for 2000?
For the commercial and support areas - is this growth from the increased deal
flow.
Do you know why the admin level increased so much?

2001 Net Growth    EES (third column-disregard first two) - no significant
changes.


Start Date: 10/26/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102617.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Tricoast

Doug Kelting 713-461-5255 ext.16

I love you.


We have been working hard over the past three months to restore normalcy to the non-debtor companies in the EGS family of asset-based businesses.   We are doing our best to operate on a business as usual basis, and continue the regular, consistent programs we previously provided.  That is why earlier this year we paid performance bonuses and merit increases to most non-debtor employees, in the ordinary course of business.

At the same time, I understand that events of the past few months have been disturbing and left many with a sense of uncertainty about their future.  We realize that you need some sort of "safety net" to allow you to be comfortable staying here as we work to reorganize.  With this in mind, I am pleased to inform you that we have put in place a severance plan for U.S. employees of certain non-debtor companies.  We have wanted this program for some time, but even as a non-debtor company we had to work extensively with consultants and creditors in securing its approval.

The severance plan provides that, under most circumstances, terminated employees would be eligible for two weeks of base pay for every full or partial year of service.  In the case of a termination due to reorganization, the minimum compensation would be eight weeks of pay and the maximum would be fifty-two weeks.  The details and restrictions to this plan are explained in the plan summary for your company's plan, which can be found on the ETS HR link on the Enron Transportation Services intranet site under "ETS HR Manuals". It can also be accessed by clicking on the attached weblink:  http://hrweb.enron.com/businessUnits/ets/etsHRmanuals.asp .

I hope this plan will give you a bit more peace of mind and allow you to continue the excellent work you have been providing in our ongoing businesses.  Please contact your HR representative, if you have any questions about the severance plan or related matters.

Stan


----- Forwarded by Angela Hylton/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 12:50 PM -----

	Angela Hylton
	11/21/2000 03:52 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hi!

Elizabeth,

My extension is x34881.   I will be in training next week.  After next week,
we can arrange some drill sessions to burn off the holiday feast we will
have.  My boyfriend, Bruce, mentioned that we should try to set up another
fun game.  Let try it in December.  Nice seeing you today.  Have a nice
thanksgiving.  Good luck on tonight's marathon match.

Angela


I just spoke with CES.  CES will keep the National Fuel for the month of June
since June is the last month.   Please call me when you get a chance to
discuss everything.

I did not discuss the Equitrans gas with CES.  I want to talk to Scott about
that tomorrow.

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           05/22/2000 11:49 AM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Questa Petroleum.

No home yet. May have to take to Penn Fuel.  I left a message with Equitable
to see if they are interested in Peoples, EOG, Equitrans and Penn Fuel.
What are you going to do with the CPA.  Bary Vanderhorst w/EES might be
interested.  If not I wll contact Equitable.

I will contact Dominion to see if they are interested in any of this gas.
John

Chris Germany@ECT
05/22/2000 11:26 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Questa Petroleum.

Do you have a home for the T&F Explor behind Penn Fuel for June?

I left a message for Charlie at CES this morning about all the other citygate
production.  I'm also trying to get a bid from CNG for the month of June on
the EOG and
Peoples gas.  I'll keep you posted.

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           05/09/2000 01:07 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Questa Petroleum.

Chris Germany@ECT
05/09/2000 12:33 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Questa Petroleum.

Do you have a current Citygate production worksheet?


The AT&T cell phone representative is in Mt. Hood and will be happy to answer any questions you might have regarding the transfer of your cell phone to a personal account.


Tana Jones will be attending.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/05/2001 03:47 PM -----

	Terri Greenlee/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/05/2001 03:33 PM

		 To: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Y Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, James L Copeland/ENRON@enronXgate, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Andrew
Greer/ENRON@enronXgate, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Rudwell
Johnson/ENRON@enronXgate, Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate, Nidia
Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Martin
O'Leary/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Radous/ENRON@enronXgate, Aparna
Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Edward Sacks/ENRON@enronXgate, Teresa
Seibel/ENRON@enronXgate, Sue Vasan/ENRON@enronXgate, Jane
Wilhite/ENRON@enronXgate, Jason R Williams/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark
Wilson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mercy Gil/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: 500 Master SWAP Agreements Celebration

Please RSVP to Mercy Gil by 5:00 p.m. today, Monday, March 5.  You may do so
by e-mail or by phoning her at x35082.

When: Wednesday, March 7th

Time: 6:00 - 8:00 p.m.

Place: Cadillac Bar - Party Shack Room
 1802 Shepherd Drive
 713.862.2020

Thank you for your prompt attention.

Terri Greenlee
x33565


The attached list is divided into two sheets:
Existing EOL counterparties
New counterparties from the MG traders (please note there are a few
duplicates between the lists - these are marked on the new MG counterparty
list)

We have heard that the NY MG traders may be adding additional counterparties
to the list.  We will keep you advised of any changes.

Regards,
Lara


Offer please.  Dec-Mar02 and then May02-Nov02.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Brent Turner" <brent@wasatchenergy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Brent+20Turner+22+20+3Cbrent+40wasatchenergy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 2:42 PM
To:	Ortiz, Lucy
Subject:

I attached the numbers this time.  Again, I'm  looking for your offer for a fixed price, Northwest Pipeline sumas index swap

Thanks
 - Enron sheet.xls


I agree on the nature of our statement and that a prompt action could avoid
another source of dispute in the credit derivatives world.
----- Original Message -----
From: <genova_diane@jpmorgan.com>
To: <RPICKEL@isda.org>
Cc: <BOARD@isda.org>; <KSumme@isda.org>; <LMarshall@isda.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: Credit Derivatives Issue

>
> I think we should issue a statement regarding the deliverability of the
> Railtrack convertible bonds.  First, I do not think that plain vanilla
> converts are "contingent."  and therefore should be deliverable.
Second,
> I think we need to have clarity and certainty here so that this issue does
> not become another cloud over the credit derivatives market.   The
> statement should simply be ISDA's view as to the meaning and intent of its
> own document.    We should probably wait until we have had the opportunity
> to see a draft of the opinion to be issued by Robin Potts (QC?) just to
> make sure that the statement and his opinion are in agreement.
>
>
>
>
> RPICKEL@isda.org on 10/15/2001 12:06:35 AM
>
>
>
> To:   BOARD@isda.org
> cc:   KSumme@isda.org, LMarshall@isda.org
> Subject:  Credit Derivatives Issue
>
>
> You should be aware that an issue is currently under extensive debate in
> the
> credit derivative area resulting from the insolvency of Railtrack in the
> UK.
> ISDA has been asked by some participants in the market to make a statement
> regarding a provision of its Credit Derivatives Definitions. Others are
> either still considering their position or would prefer that ISDA not
issue
> a statement.
>
> Specifically, the discussion relates to the deliverability of convertible
> bonds of Railtrack. There is no dispute that a Credit Event occurred. What
> is in dispute is whether the bonds satisfy the definition of "Not
> Contingent" under the Definitions, which is a characteristic typically
> required of deliverable obligations. This characteristic requires that the
> payment or repayment of principal on the bonds not be subject to a
> contingency. The bonds are convertible into equity of Railtrack at the
> option of the holder or, in certain limited circumstances, at the option
of
> the trustee for the bondholder. The provision for the trustee to exercise
> the conversion (sometimes referred to as a "widows and orphans" clause) is
> a
> standard clause in bonds issued in England and is intended to protect
> bondholders who may have inadvertently failed to exercise their conversion
> right when it would be clearly beneficial economically for them to do so.
> In
> the case of Railtrack, conversion would not have been economically
> beneficial at any time recently, but nevertheless the right of the trustee
> to convert exists.
>
> A draft statement has been prepared for consideration by the Credit
> Derivatives Market Practice Committee, which I have attached for your
> review. The statement refers to two documents that are in draft form, the
> User's Guide to the Definitions (which is scheduled to be published in the
> next week or two) and a Supplement currently under consideration by the
> "group of six" subgroup of the Committee. In each of these documents, we
> suggest that "plain vanilla" convertible bonds should satisfy the "Not
> Contingent" characteristic and should, therefore, be deliverable. "Plain
> vanilla" convertible bonds for this purpose include bonds where conversion
> is at the option of the holder of the trustee.
>
> A meeting of a number of dealers based in London (not an ISDA meeting) is
> scheduled for Tuesday. It is not likely that we will publish anything
prior
> to that meeting.
>
> I would appreciate your views on whether we should issue any statement
> regarding this situation. We are continuing to poll members for their
views
> on whether this type of market statement would be appropriate. We are also
> discussing with Allen & Overy and with Clifford Chance and Linklaters how
> we
> might achieve a legal basis for making the statement. Please share your
> views with the other addressees of this email, as they are coordinating
the
> views of members.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not intended
as
> an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial
instrument
> or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
> and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
> are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made
herein
> do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its
> subsidiaries and affiliates.
>


any word on the supreme court ruling?  I figure that ought to add $5 to the
stock price instantly, if it comes out right.  df


--
---
Angelica M. Paez

----------
From: MGoetz8440@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:08:16 EDT
To: ampaez@earthlink.net
Subject: thought you might like this website

https://www.unicahome.com/welcome.asp


Start Date: 3/9/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030903.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  28.40)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  45.00 / Final:  44.20)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: DELANO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01
  UNIT_ID: PANDOL_6_UNIT
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  13.00 / Final:  12.80)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  62.00 / Final:  61.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  63.00 / Final:  61.83)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstSW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  13.00 / Final:   9.20)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/9/01
  TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


Pat, what do you think of this?  I view it as problemmatic because I believe the grant agreements and the stock plan should govern.  Your comments and suggested revisions would be appreciated.  Thanks.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Eduardo Ribeiro Toledo" <toledo@veirano.com.br>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Eduardo+20Ribeiro+20Toledo+22+20+3Ctoledo+40veirano+2Ecom+2Ebr+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 23, 2001 4:01 PM
To:	Vassel, Sandra; Cash, Michelle; Treadwell, Robin L.; Ryan, Noel
Subject:	Re: Retention Plan Schedule

Dear All,

please find attached hereto the draft of the stock option agreement
according to our call held last Thursday and the subsequent electronic
messages. Modification includes (i) item 1 - ref. to the Committee and
Black-Scholes valuation; (ii) item 4 - ref. to the former vesting scheduled;
(iii) item 6 - expanded non-compete clause; (iv) item 7 - expanded
confidentiality clause; and (v) new item 8 - non-soliciting
(customers/employees) clause (please confirm/decide the terms for those
obligations). Having everything decided, please let me know so as to change
the Portuguese version.

Should you need any clarification, please write or call.

Kind Regards,

Eduardo Ribeiro Toledo
Veirano & Advogados Associados
Attorneys-at-Law
Av. Presidente Wilson 231 - 23rd floor
20.030-021 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ
Brazil

toledo@veirano.com.br

tel + 55 21 3824-4747
fax + 55 21 262-4247

----- Original Message -----
From: <Sandra.Vassel@enron.com>
To: <Michelle.Cash@enron.com>; <Robin.L.Treadwell@enron.com>;
<Noel.Ryan@enron.com>
Cc: <toledo@veirano.com.br>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 2:27 PM
Subject: RE: Retention Plan Schedule

> Eduardo Toledo's email address is: toledo@veirano.com.br
>
> Please make sure you correct it on your files.
>
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra Vassel/SA/Enron on 07/20/2001
> 02:30 PM ---------------------------
>
> From: Michelle Cash/Enron@EnronXGate on 07/20/2001 10:49 AM CDT
>
> To:   Robin L Treadwell/ENRON@enronXgate, Sandra Vassel/SA/Enron@Enron,
>       Noel Ryan/ENRON@enronXgate, toledo@verioano.com.br@SMTP@enronXgate
> cc:
>
> Subject:  RE: Retention Plan Schedule
>
> That seems logical. As I mentioned before, vesting language will appear in
> the grant agreements, and the corporate compensation team does not like to
> see it anywhere else. Michelle
>
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: Treadwell, Robin L.
>    Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 10:45 AM
>    To: Cash, Michelle; Vassel, Sandra; Ryan, Noel;
'toledo@verioano.com.br'
>    Subject: RE: Retention Plan Schedule
>
>
>    yes, i'm referring to the vesting. It was changed to (I think) 15%
>    increments. We want to go with the 1/3 schedule instead.
>
>    Let me know if there are still any doubts.
>
>    Thanks
>
>      -----Original Message-----
>      From: Cash, Michelle
>      Sent: Thu 7/19/2001 3:02 PM
>      To: Treadwell, Robin L.; Vassel, Sandra; Ryan, Noel;
>      'toledo@verioano.com.br'
>      Cc:
>      Subject: RE: Retention Plan Schedule
>
>
>
>      Robin, are you talking about vesting? If so that schedule appears in
>      the grant agreement, although we can tell them what it will be.
>      Michelle
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>      From: Treadwell, Robin L.
>      Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 1:53 PM
>      To: Vassel, Sandra; Ryan, Noel; Cash, Michelle;
>         'toledo@verioano.com.br'
>      Subject: Retention Plan Schedule
>      Importance: High
>
>
>         Update
>
>         Joe Kishkill and Orlando Gonzalez prefer to use the 1/3, 1/3, 1/3
>         schedule.
>
>         We should include this change with those we discussed in this
>         morning's meeting.
>
>         Please let me know if there are any issues with this.
>
>         thanks, Robin
>
>
>
>
>

 - retention 2001 options3.doc


Hi Sara...I'm forwarding an RPF fron ConEd New York, Inc......
We are only looking to do Proposal #1.....basically we will quote on:
Cal 01
50 - 100 MW
5 X 16 peak
Zone G, NY
Financial swap

Included in the RFP is their sample Energy purchase agreement, can you please
take a look and make any necessary comments?
The RFP is due Dec. 8.
Thanks,
Janelle

"Forte, Michael" <FORTEM@coned.com> on 11/30/2000 09:26:04 AM
To: "Forte, Michael" <FORTEM@coned.com>
cc:

Subject: RFP: Orange and Rockland Utilities

    Attached for your review and consideration is a Request-for-Proposals
for firm electric energy for Orange and Rockland Utilities.

 <<ORU RFP_2001.doc>>
Thank you and have a great day!
Michael
Voice:  (212) 460-3537
Fax:    (917) 534-4042
Mobile: (914) 319-5348
Pager:  1-800-946-4646 (pin:142 64 67)

 - ORU RFP_2001.doc


As requested, here is the December Autoweb.com Newsletter.

NEW VEHICLE QUOTE

Start the New Year off with the car of your dreams.  Get a quote on the new
2001 models.
New Car Quote

MORE THAN A VEHICLE-BUYING SITE

Autoweb.com can help you with every aspect of buying, selling and owning a
vehicle.  You may have already used our extensive research tools and our
free service to purchase your vehicle.  But at Autoweb.com, you can also
place a classified ad and get great advice on prepping your car for sale.
Check out the Maintain section for great repair and maintenance information.
Get free online quotes for insurance and loans, or find all you ever wanted
to know about financing, insurance, credit and warranties.  Car buffs can
read the latest automotive news, see some awesome car collectibles and read
both professional and consumer reviews..

So stop by Autoweb.com for all your automotive needs.   And check out our
new, easier-to-navigate homepage.

Autoweb.com Home

OUR AUDIO CENTER IS LIVE!

Whether you're building a completely new audio system or just want to add a
CD changer, Autoweb.com's Audio Center provides top-notch selection and
expertise. Our partners offer in-dash receivers, amplifiers, signal
processors, speakers, subwoofers, box enclosures and multimedia options.

A wealth of installation and setup tools are also available. A wide variety
of electrical and installation accessories are available to help you
assemble the perfect audio system.

Audio Center

VIEW 2001 MODELS WITH INTERIOR 360o
Interior 360o lets you view a vehicle interior from any angle. Check out any
one of the 126 top selling vehicles on the market using this revolutionary
product:
- This patented Java technology requires no download or installation.
- Immerse yourself in a realistic, 3-dimensional image.
- Use your mouse or keyboard to rotate the image up, down, left and right.
- Step inside the car, navigating 360o by 360o -- zoom in and out.

Interior 360o

NEW CREDIT CENTER PROVIDES ACCESS TO FREE ONLINE CREDIT REPORTS

Autoweb.com is happy to announce the launch of its new Credit Center,
designed to provide you with extensive information about credit. The Credit
Center is a one-stop source for consumers to access a wealth of credit
information. With more than 100 original articles, monthly email newsletters
and an Ask the Expert forum, the Credit Center helps you stay up-to-date on
trends in the credit industry, new legislation, facts and tips on identity
theft and more. You'll also be able to fill out an application and receive a
free credit report securely over the Internet.  Check it out today at:

New Credit Center

Credit Center
***ADVERTISEMENT***
Sponsor:  WarrantyDirect.com
Blurb:  Ext. warranties-$50 off to Autoweb visitors til 1/15-FREE Roadside
Assistance-20 Yr old public co.-Buy direct & save

Click here
******************************************************

FACTORY REBATES ARE AT A SEASON-LONG HIGH WITH OVER 400 MAKES & MODELS!

Find a Car

---
You are currently subscribed to Autoweb.com News as: john.parker@autoweb.com
If you wish to be removed from the Autoweb.com News mailing list send a
blank email to: leave-news-932653V@lists.autoweb.com

---
You are currently subscribed to Autoweb.com News as: pallen@enron.com
If you wish to be removed from the Autoweb.com News mailing list send a blank
email to: leave-news-932653V@lists.autoweb.com


Mary:  I'll meet with you tomorrow.  I think that Carol will be your backup
on this transaction.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Just wanted to let you know that we will not be having any JA meetings
at Cy-Fair High School until about mid-January.  Paper work will
probably be returned to me hopefully around then and we will probably
start up our meetings again around January 15th or the 22nd.  I will be
sure and send you a meeting before then.

Also, we have been asked to do the Aquatic Gardens centerpieces for the
Texas Society of CPA's gala.  It is being held on January 30th at the
Hyatt Regency Downtown.  They have asked that we have everything set-up
no later than 5:00 p.m. that day.  I am in the process of trying to get
the vases possibly shipped to us direct from the manufacturer.  I have
also contacted a fish store about getting the Bettas than we will be
needing.

Is it possible that you might be able to get us a guest speaker to come
to the school in late January or early February?  In the past, we have
had some one from Human Resources, a marketing person and also an IS
person come out and talk to the students.  Please let me know.

Judy Wirzberg

--
BM8h!

 - wirzbergj.vcf


I think that him leaving word for Michele might be more palatable.


Costilla has sent in a new request , take a look and let me know.

Meter                                         Current
Volume                                     New Volume

56639
450                                                               600

9723
269                                                               300

9724
24                                                                     10

9687
20,486                                                    22,250        In
Feb. they were in the 21,250 range,  in Jan they started at 14,000 mid month
and

                                                               reached 23,000
by end of month.

9734
8,000                                                         11,000      In
Feb they went from 6,000 to 9,000  but in Jan they only flowed around 600 all
month.

                                                               Big increase
between months.

5116
55
83


I WANT TO PLAY GOLF ON TUESDAY MORNING.  IT IS LADIES MORNING AT LCC SO WE
CANNOT PLAY THERE.  I HAVE A CONNECTION AT THE HOUSTONIAN.   GREAT PRICES.  IF
YOU ARE INTERESTED ,  CALL OR EMAIL.


Dan,

Attached below is another Netting Agreement that this counteparty would like
to have executed.  This is mainly an active Canadian counterparty (where we
have all contracts executed with ECC) but they also do business with ENA.
The exposures are getting significant enough where they are needing netting
arrangements.

Please take a look at this draft that they have forwarded below.  If you find
it unacceptable, let me know and I will communicate it to the counterparty
and forward ours.  They initiated this and preferred we view their "simple"
document.

Thanks,

Veronica

---------------------- Forwarded by Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron on
08/17/2000 05:18 PM ---------------------------

"Jill Yow" <Jill_Yow@pancanadian.ca> on 08/17/2000 05:17:54 PM
Please respond to Jill_Yow@pancanadian.ca
To: veronica.espinoza@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Net Settlement Agreement

Veronica,

As discussed, please find attached a copy of our Net Settlement
Agreement for your review.

Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at (403)
268-7999.

Thank you,
Jill Yow

 - Enron North America Corp..doc


Jason, you can go ahead and remove my name from the email distribution list
as I am no longer working in the controls group.  I've enjoyed working with
you and will definitely pay you all a visit when I travel to London this
fall.  Cheers.

Jason Harding
03/24/2000 09:26 AM
To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Stadler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin
Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT, sscott5@ect.enron.com, Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: London Reports - 23 March


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 02:00 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz@ENRON
	11/30/2000 01:59 PM

		 To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Noel
Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: ClickPaper approvals, 11-30-00

Attached are ClickPaper approvals for November 30, 2000.


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000
10:40 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Lillian Carroll                           09/27/2000 08:45 AM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
McCurley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Systems Outsourcing Meeting

Brian Redmond has requested a meeting to discuss Systems Outsourcing on
Friday, Oct., 6, in Dave Delainey's office, EB3314 @ 2:00 PM with Dave
Delainey, Greg Whalley, Philipe Bibi and Jean Mrha.  If this time does not
work for you, please call Lillian Carroll @ 37271.  Thank you.