yes if you have an idea of where he should go?  did he come from another rotation in trading?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 4:12 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	RE: Elizabeth Shim

Please place her at 60 or below.  She is under a performance review plan and has been removed from Trading Track.

Zack McCarroll started with the west desk two weeks ago.  Do we need to add him to the list?

Thanks,
Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slone, Jeanie
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 3:44 PM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	RE: Elizabeth Shim

she was not.  do you need to see the list again to know where to rank her?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 2:31 PM
To:	Slone, Jeanie
Subject:	Elizabeth Shim

Was Elizabeth Shim on the list?  I can't remember.

Mike


Bob finally entered these. Here are the deal numbers and details:

471546
Enron buys El Paso
25 MW
141.00
Palo Verde
On Peak

471547
Enron sells EES
25 MW
141.05
Palo Verde
On Peak

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/01/2000 08:47 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: tfs checkout

can you check with bob again, because i got confirms on the deals.  the
broker told me yesterday he forgot to tell bob.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                11/30/2000 06:05 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: tfs checkout

Bob does not recognize these deals, and tried to check with the broker. He'll
talk to TFS in the morning to verify these and I'll let you know ASAP.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/30/2000 02:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: tfs checkout

missing 2 deals for bob:

buy el paso
cal 01
141.00
25 mw
pv
on peak

sell ees
cal 01
141.05
25 mw
pv
on peak

thanks


Guys,

I am really glad that the report generations were working fine during the period when I was away,
thanks to the efforts of Kim, Lindon and Angela. But I am so sad that you don't have to have me around anymore for your reports ...

Hereby I'd like to give you an update on a few issues we fixed/fixing.
	a) Code has been added to show the Storage balance in the historical report instead of average
	b) Because OLAP cube interprets Null as 0 value, we saw monthly average to be 0 but actually should be Null,
	we've added code to detect Null value so that "NA" will be shown for monthly average rather than 0.
	c) Some pipeline (e.g. PGE) broadcast forward (future) flow, so in the end of the month, the latest month in Time
	dimension of the cube does not indicate the correct one. For instance, today is May. 31, the latest month in Time
	dimension is already June, which cause problems in historical report. It has been fixed.
	e) Central historical reports have been made fit to one page, and extra sheets on the interactive ones have been removed.

Matt: In order for the above items to take effect please verify with the executable Kim give you and let us know so that we can use it to replace
the one currently used for report generation.

Another thing I talked with Matt was the Maximum Capacity column. I understand that you'd like to remove that column for reports which do
not report this value, however it involves big structure change to take one column away. I am wondering if we can put "NA" or use some other wording
such as "not reported" instead to save coding time and structure change. I need your feedback on this.

One last item is that I checked the log for both daily and historical report and noticed that there are still quite some points their report setting are not quite
right. Please take a look at the attached, if it is a report you are responsible, make sure the settings are right so we don't see error in the log.

Thanks, I'll try to write short email next time.

Yan x33228


Mark,

As you requested, below is a list of my major accomplishments for the year.

1. Resolution/management of pre-litigation and litigation matters,
including:  Dwayne Hart/Utilicorp; Satterwhite; Barrington; Race/Statoil;
Ross Malme; Rick Blandford; West Boettcher; Anita Suson; Charlie Weymms;
Steven Cuneo; others.

2.  Efficient management of drafting, negotiating, revising, and completing
several types of contracts in numerous different jurisdictions (e.g., almost
200 employment agreements, 35 separation agreements, and 30 consulting
services agreements).

3. Lead attorney on Project One (which involves issues surrounding the
OFCCP's "glass ceiling" audit of ENA and all of Enron).

4. Labor and employment transactional support, including:  East Coast Power,
Ecogas, CGas, Project Hurricane, Columbia, Project Grizzly, Las Vegas Cogen,
and other acquisitions that involve the transfer or hiring of personnel. Many
of these transactions require extensive legal support relating to personnel
matters after closing.

5. Legal support on labor (union) matters, including successful closing of
project labor agreements for the construction of generation assets (e.g.,
Pittsburg, 2000 peakers, Pastoria), Unfair Labor Practice matters, training
on union-related issues in M&A's.

Let me know if you need any more information, and thanks for your support!

Michelle


To:	All ENW Employees

From:	Greg Piper and Mark Pickering

Please print and become familiar with the updated ENW T&E Policy, which is attached.  Changes to the policy include business-first travel,
with supervisor approval, for international flights over 4 hours in duration (excluding Canada and Mexico).  Supervisors will be responsible for making the decisions and bearing the expense for business-first travel.

If you have any questions about the policy or an expense not covered under the policy, please contact Tina Spiller or Lisa Costello.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: heatcrack33.pdf)(See attached file: gascrack33.pdf)(See
attached file: crudespread33.pdf)
 - heatcrack33.pdf
 - gascrack33.pdf
 - crudespread33.pdf


... and retirement.  I resigned on Friday but it won't be effective until Feb
28.  Check out the cabinet I made.

Love

Rob


FYI - those of you running firm books.  These adjustments described below are
due to firm book PMA's we recieve from Tiffany Miller.  In the future, we
need to put these in the appropriate schedules - C & E.  Schedule C should be
used for MTM adjustments and Schedule E should be used for all other
adjustments.  Shout with any questions.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
08:42 AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
03/12/2001 08:03 AM
To: Greg Whiting/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Topside adjustments to rolls

Please clarify.  Thanks.

Greg Whiting@ENRON
03/09/2001 02:38 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elaine Schield/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Topside adjustments to rolls

Jeff,

I need your help with a few items.  In the DPR rolls for several books this
month there were topside adjustments inserted.  It was my understanding that
all topsides would be included on the associated roll schedules (Sch E and
Sch C).  Investigating all of these is greatly increasing our reconciliation
time.  Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.  Here are a few
books that had topsides:

MTM Topsides that should have been on Schedule C
GD-Central
FT-Texas
FT-Central
Liquidation topsides that should have been on Schedule E
GD-Central
FT-Northwest
FT-Ontario

Let me know if you need more information or if there is anything we can do to
help.  Thanks.

     Greg x35399


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 02/28/2001
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,751
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	4,415
Total Life to Date Transactions	725,230

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 02/28/01	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,721	77%
Enron Europe Limited	243	40%
Global Markets	296	41%
Enron Metals	491	18%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	55%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	3,107,299,742
MTD	48,333,419,158
LTD	440,906,808,240
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,537,324,499

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	32,542,685,189

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	693
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	4
Number of Products Offered Today	1,382
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	3,533
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,447


Please use this form of the CA.  We had to change the heading.  Thanks
Ben


Fair Value is applied to plant and is being amortized over a useful life.
TW Fair Value is very similar to Goodwill in that it represents an excess over book value, and is not formally being recoverd in rates; BUT at the time of the  acquistion it was treated as a purchase price allocation an applied to plant. Goodwill is meant to be a "leftover" after all costs have been allocated.

-----Original Message-----
From: Geaccone, Tracy
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:21 AM
To: Saunders, James
Subject: FW: Transwestern Fair Value

?????

-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A.
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:01 AM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: RE: Transwestern Fair Value

Banks want to exclude goodwill. How would you explain the difference between the two?
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


FYI...

I will be at an all-day timekeeping class tomorrow, Thursday March 29 in 2AC
12C5.  Debbie Ramey will be the temporary filling in for me during my
absence.

Thanks!

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


Elliot wants to have another conference call to discuss this weeks events. It seems that we've made some progress on several projects in the last few days. A suggestion was made that we schedule something around 1 PM pst tomorrow. That's 3pm on a Friday for you Houstonians?  Let me know if this doesn't work for anyone. Assuming there are no conflicts, I'll send a call-in number either this afternoon or early tomorrow.
Cheers,
Jesse


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/02/2000 03:13
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           10/02/2000 03:12 PM

To: Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Booth.Chris@enron.com@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: LM6K Change Order #2

I suggest the changes as shown on the attached.

Chris is researching a drawing number so that we have them committed to a
certain specification.

I've added the concept of a date certain for the delivery.  I'm referring to
these as "Equipment" and part of the "Units" so it is clear that the
warranties apply.

Is there any change to the sound guaranty level (or other guarantees) for the
units utilizing these stacks?

Kay

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Booth.Chris@enron.com, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: LM6K Change Order #2

Kay:

Attached is Change Order #2 which has the changes Chris Booth made and a few
minor type type changes I made.  I don't know Chris Calger or his title, so
if you would like me to obtain his signature, please advise.

Kathy
x56400


I got it no problem.

Peter


Just wanted to let everyone know I started a new job last Friday:
    Pipeline Power Partners
    10000 Memorial Drive, Suite 200
    Houston, Texas 77024
    713-290-8762
I'm back working on compressor stations and gas storage projects with some
of the guys I worked with on the Columbia Gas Compressor station in '93-'94.
Note new email address also.

Barry called me last week about the well pump. It was not working and he had
tried everything he knew to do. We decided to call Western Water Well
Service in Conroe to check it out. Bottom line-it was beyond repair and we
had to replace at a cost of $765.52. When our tenant at the time took it
upon himself to dig a new well ($1500) he had them put in a real cheap
pump-so that's why it went out in a relatively short period of time. We now
have only $90 in the account so everyone needs to think about making a
contribution sometime soon. If you have a question, please call.

Conrad

 - winmail.dat


Good start.  Could you drop them into power point and forward along.  I'll
try to add them to what I'm doing.  Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 01:51
PM ---------------------------

Paulo Issler
12/07/2000 01:49 PM
To: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: put on collar

I am working on that now.

Zimin Lu
12/07/2000 11:26 AM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: put on collar

I re-compiled Exotica.xll, so that the xcol function is a put on collar.

De-add in your Exotica. Add this special one. And use xcol for put.

Then delete the Exotica_xcol_putoncollar.xll

We will build in this functionality in near future.

Zimin

Paulo,

Can you add a flag to xcol function so that we can choose a put or call from
the
spreadsheet ?

Thanks.

Zimin


The attached letter is being delivered this morning to the FERC
commissioners.  Since the letter concerns a matter currently pending before
the commission it will also be served on the parties.  We plan to talk to the
press about it as well.  A number of other companies and organizations are
also submitting letters and we have helped prepare an EPSA filing which
focusses specifically on California.  Our best information at this point is
that the FERC staff report regarding California is generally accurate, and
therefore, favorable.  While it will mention periodic exercises of market
power, it is expected to lay blame for California's woes at the feet of
California's own decisions about market structure.  It is further expected
that the report will not provide a basis for ordering refunds.  On the other
hand, the Commission's order (to be considered tomorrow along with the
staff's report) is expected to at least put refunds on the table for comment
and to discuss, and perhaps implement, further price caps.  This is just our
best guess at this point.  the Commission has put special emphasis on putting
the report and order under wraps until wednesday.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/31/2000 07:24 AM -----

	Rosalee Fleming
	10/30/2000 06:00 PM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Hoecker letter


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001
01:20 PM ---------------------------

Kevin Kindall@ENRON
03/15/2001 10:51 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Project writeup


How are the appointments turning out from your perspective?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 04:11 PM -----

	"Nike Papadopoulos" <nikep@edelmanmexico.com.mx>
	12/04/2000 11:22 AM
	Please respond to nikep

		 To: <max.yzaguirre@enron.com>, <skean@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>,
<eric.thode@enron.com>, <jaime.alatorre@enron.com>,
<Ricardo.Charvel@enron.com>, <jaime.williams@enron.com>, <sirvin@enron.com>,
<msabine@enron.com>, <agustin.perez@enron.com>
		 cc: <aventura@edelmanmexico.com.mx>
		 Subject: Energy Analysis

Attached you will find last week's energy analysis which includes
information about Vicente Fox's Energy team.

Thank you.

 - 24Nov-3Dec.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 09:18
AM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/31/2000 09:07:48 AM
To: " - *Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com" <Kevin.Ruscitti@enron.com>, " -
*chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *cfrankl2@enron.com" <cfrankl2@enron.com>, " -
*joan.veselack@enron.com" <joan.veselack@enron.com>, " - *vversen@enron.com"
<vversen@enron.com>, " - *cindy.vachuska@enron.com"
<cindy.vachuska@enron.com>, " - *cora_pendergrass@enron.com"
<cora_pendergrass@enron.com>, " - *mmitche2@enron.com" <mmitche2@enron.com>,
" - *scott.goodell@enron.com" <scott.goodell@enron.com>, " -
*steve.gillespie@enron.com" <steve.gillespie@enron.com>, " -
*cgarcia@enron.com" <cgarcia@enron.com>, " - *despey@enron.com"
<despey@enron.com>, " - *joann.collins@enron.com" <joann.collins@enron.com>
Subject: CES Daily March Requirements for 3/31, 4/1 thru 4/3

The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for   3/31 thru 4/3
.    There are two worksheets:  The one labelled with today's date contains
the
volumes that we need at each of the delivery points indicated.   The
schedulers
will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed at a specific
point.    The AGL volumes are not current and should be ignored.

The sheet labelled 'Daily Change' shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in
the requested daily volume relative to a prior value.  For the current gas
day,
the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using the previous day's
volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current gas day is 3/28, then
the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for 3/28).  For
tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the change is computed using
the First-of-the-month volumes requested for those days.  (e.g., If today is
3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect to the
first-of-the-month volumes for those days.)   This sheet should be useful in
determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that we take or turn back.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-31-00daily volsAM.xls


I made a few changes from on the Socal forecast:

1.)  Put in the updated PV, NP, & SP power curves - now the generators are
running at peak levels
2.) Increased Ehrenberg from 1.2 to 1.25
3.) Took off the weather adjustments when the new SP generation begins

The new forecast brings Socal storage to a max of 86 Bcf before Q3.  We can
discuss this further on Monday.

Matt


Yes, put 20 on black if you get this.

-----Original Message-----
From: Don.Baughman@enron.com [mailto:Don.Baughman@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 4:20 PM
To: jeff.maack@ipgdirect.com
Subject: Re: TradersNews

Gracias amigo, I really appreciate it.  I'm sure I'll have some good
stories to tell, when I get back.  I'll holler at you next week.

Later,

Don

PS Do you want me to put $20 on black for you?

"Jeff Maack" <jeff.maack@ipgdirect.com> on 03/08/2001 01:56:56 PM

To:   <Don.Baughman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  TradersNews

Don,
Ellen should be e-mailing you the history in a few minutes.  Have a good
trip and I will speak with you next week regarding
cocktails.

Jeff


Joe Stepenovitch dropped: Mathis, Terance ATL WR
and acquired: McCardell, Keenan JAC WR

Natural Gas Gridiron Address:
http://fflnet.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/home/0205

Questions about this site?  Check out our FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
at http://www.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/support_faq.html
or our detailed on-line help at
http://www.myfantasyleague.com/fflnet2001/coach.html


damn, boy.  you're getting punked out!

	Eric Bass@ECT
	12/06/00 04:00 PM

		 To: Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject:

Your mom is so fat that God said "Let there be light," right after she moved
her fat ass.


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 11/19/01.   The Yuma Companies (Inc.) has been added to this week's "Call Credit" column.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923,  Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002 or Darren Vanek at x3-1436.


Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-00709     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                        24                    24
Working                          24                    24
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01848     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                        87                    87
Working                          87                    87
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01849     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                        13                    13
Working                          13                    13
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01850     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       208                   208
Working                         208                   208
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01851     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         6                     6
Working                           6                     6
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01891     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                        19                    19
Working                          19                    19
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01918     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                        24                    24
Working                          24                    24
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01919     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                        79                    79
Working                          79                    79
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01920     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                        84                    84
Working                          84                    84
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01921     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       401                   401
Working                         401                   401
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01923     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       312                   312
Working                         312                   312
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-01960     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       550                   550
Working                         550                   550
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-05683     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                        46                    46
Working                          46                    46
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-10160     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                        24                    24
Working                          24                    24
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0

Company: 000236     Arng: 66917-00009     Eff Date: 2001-11-19

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       225                   225
Working                         225                   225
Capacity Allocation               0  CCR                0
Confirmed                         0                     0


We are very short on legal help at the moment.  Please permit me to respond
to your request early next week with an acceptable time.  Thank you.  Sara

Robert.Aicher@kmz.com on 04/13/2000 08:23:14 AM
To: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com
cc: Kris Grosshans <Kris.Grosshans@abnamro.com>
Subject: Scheduling a time to talk about the ABN/AMRO margin agreement

Sara, could we schedule a time to talk about the margin loan agreement and
the form of guaranty? I can do it anytime tommorrow (Friday) afternoon.
Kris will not be on the call. I would like to see what points we can
resolve before we resort to the business people. Thanks.


The report named: NG - Price P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=10&report_name=NG+-+Price+P/L&category_cd=5&category_name=FINANCIAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=5&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/26/2001>, published as of 11/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dave Parquet, Richard Sanders,
mday@gmssr.com, gfergus@brobeck.com, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT,
steve.c.hall@enron.com, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart
Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve
Kean, Richard Shapiro, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, James E
Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron,
Dennis Benevides, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris Stokley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Murray P
O'Neil/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Aamodt@Gateway, Jay Dudley, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Kathryn
Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
From: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT
Date: 11/10/2000 04:00:40 PM
Subject: Fwd: DJ - Calif PUC Unlikely To Order Refunds From Pwr Generators

Please forward this to anyone I have forgotten.  Thanks.

DJ Calif PUC Unlikely To Order Refunds From Pwr Generators
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

(This article was originally published Thursday)

     LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--The California Public Utilities Commission
likely won't order generators to refund billions of dollars in windfall
profits from last summer's wholesale power price spikes to utilities and
customers, commissioners told Dow Jones Newswires Thursday.

     A Republican commissioner said the PUC knows generators are manipulating
the wholesale power market in California but the commission doesn't have the
"expertise in-house to figure out who it is and how it's being done."

     "Even if we could force refunds, it would take five to 10 years in court
to decide if generators should refund money," the commissioner said. "I don't
think the state is willing to spend the money or the time."

     In addition, the commission is nowhere near deciding whether Edison
International (EIX) unit Southern California Edison and PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit
Pacific Gas & Electric can pass on a combined $5 billion in debt to their
ratepayers, the commissioner said.

     A decision won't likely be made until mid-2001, the commissioner added.

     Only PUC President Loretta Lynch and Commissioner Carl Wood support
having generators refund windfall profits to utilities and ratepayers. The
commission's investigation, one of two ongoing probes into the state's
troubled wholesale power market, has been unsuccessful in finding evidence
that would force generators to refund billions of dollars, according to
documents obtained Thursday by Dow Jones Newswires.

     Last week, federal regulators determined generators didn't manipulate
the market. But they did find flaws in the state's market structure and said
rates were "unjust and unreasonable."

     The state's Independent System Operator and Power Exchange have also
concluded they have no evidence to prove generators manipulated the market in
order to drive up wholesale power prices.

     The commissioner said the PUC doesn't support the utilities' efforts to
pass on $5 billion in wholesale power costs to ratepayers.

     The commissioner said "if it came down to deciding tomorrow, the
utilities would be left holding the bag."

     PG&E and SoCal Edison pay about 16 cents a kilowatt-hour for wholesale
power. But the utilities charge their customers far less under a
state-mandated rate freeze.

     As reported earlier Thursday, SoCal Edison President and Chief Executive
Officer Stephen Frank said the utility's inability to immediately recover
more than $2 billion in debt from its ratepayers may force the company to lay
off employees and reduce major capital spending.

     PG&E filed a lawsuit in federal court Wednesday asking a judge to allow
the utility to pass on $3 billion in debt to its customers.

     -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
mailto:jason.leopold@dowjones.com
     (END) Dow Jones Newswires 10-11-00


i will go if you want me to - does that sound familiar?

Shanna Husser@ENRON
03/20/2000 02:33 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

OK- Would I have asked you if I didn't want you to go??  Just like a woman.

 In all honesty- if you don't want to go- I probably won't go either.  I am
not a huge professional baseball fan- it is so slow!-  so to go to something
like that I really need to enjoy the people that I am with.  Don't think that
the tax department necessarily falls into that category- but would be
bareable if you were there. Just a side thought- but my dad would be so mad
if he knew I had the opportunity to go- but didn't.  Don't know why that just
popped in my head.  I guess I write e-mails using "stream of consciousness"
also.

Also- you know- you and Jennifer are a lot alike.  You know how you send me
ugly e-mails when you are the last person on any group e-mail that I send
out.  Well- she is even worse- she just called and yelled at me- b/c she was
not the FIRST person on a group e-mail that I sent.

SH

	From:  Eric Bass @ ECT                           03/20/2000 02:20 PM

To: Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re:

do you want me to go?

Shanna Husser@ENRON
03/20/2000 01:15 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Hey-

April 10th Astros game vs. St. Louis- do you want to go??  I need to let them
know if I want another to get on the list for an extra ticket.

SH


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000
10:26 AM ---------------------------

wcolwel@enron.com on 11/17/2000 12:56:27 PM
To: ddelain2@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Approval for reviewer

COLWELL,WESLEY  has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your
approval.  You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP
at http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.  Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on COLWELL,WESLEY  until you have
approved the list.


I checked with my boss Mark Taylor, VP and General Counsel, and he said it
was OK to send you our templates forms.  Per our Confirmation Desk, there are
many more Physical templates for all of these commodities, but these are the
basic Firm delivery templates.

Nat Gas/Liquids-Financial:

Nat Gas-Physical:

Power Financial:

Power Physical:

Coal Financial: Same as Nat Gas Financial

Still waiting on Coal Physical and Liquids Physical.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/24/2001 02:14
PM ---------------------------
From: Chris Booth/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 02:12 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: FW: Escrow Agreement

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Young, Michael" <Michael.Young@northwestern.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Young+2C+20Michael+22+20+3CMichael+2EYoung+40northwester
n+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Booth, Chris
Cc: 'margueritekahn@paulhastings.com'
Subject: Escrow Agreement

Chris, per our conversation this afternoon, this e-mail will document the
fact that, due to travel schedules, NorthWestern is unable to obtain the
necessary officer signatures for the incumbency documents requested by
Citibank as part of establishing the escrow arrangement called for under the
Letter Agreement.  You agreed that NorthWestern could complete the necessary
paperwork with Citibank on Tuesday of next week.  Thanks again for your
flexibility.

Michael J. Young
Senior Corporate Counsel
NorthWestern Corporation
125 S. Dakota Avenue
Sioux Falls, SD  57104
Fax:  605/978-2840
Phone:  605/978-2836
Cell:  605/351-4040


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <mguido@Hess.com>
Date: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:09:52 GMT
Subject:

Subject: FW: Revisions to EIA Monthly and Weekly Gas Storage Estimates

Listed below is the EIA explanation that was released at the time of week's
storage data.

Revisions to EIA Monthly and Weekly Gas Storage Estimates
Measures of working gas, base gas, and total gas in storage for March 2002
based on the EIA monthly survey of all gas storage operators were released
on June 19, 2002, along with revisions for the months of November 2001
through February 2002 in the Natural Gas Monthly.

The March monthly data provided the first opportunity since the beginning of
the EIA weekly natural gas storage survey to compare the reports of monthly
and weekly surveys for weekly sample members for a comparable report period
(the end of March for the monthly survey and the weekly surveys for the
Fridays preceding and following the end of March). As a result of the
cross-survey data comparison, a number of questions were directed to the
respective respondent contacts. Many of these questions have been resolved,
resulting in new or revised submissions of data for either the monthly or
weekly surveys. Although most respondents have been prompt, a few questions
remain. Reasons for revisions in monthly and weekly data include resolution
of:
? Companies' reporting responsibilities for their field operations
? Questions about how joint operations of a field should be reported
? Questions about whether gas should be identified as base or working gas
Revisions to Derived Weekly Estimates. The recent revisions to EIA monthly
data for November 2001 through February 2002 required reestimation of the
derived estimates for the weeks in that period to conform to the methodology
for the derived estimates. The derived estimates (which are calculated to
provide comparison to prior years) are weekly stock estimates calibrated to
the EIA monthly surveys. (A description of the methodology is available at
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/ngs/history.html.) Changes to the derived
estimates will occur whenever the EIA monthly volumes for periods prior to
March 2002 are revised. Eventually, weekly estimates based on the EIA weekly
survey (Form EIA-912) will be available for all prior period comparisons.
The largest revision to any derived weekly stock estimate for the weeks
during November 2001-February 2002 is an increase of 50 Bcf, or 1.6 percent,
for the November 30, 2001, estimate. This adjustment is composed of
increases of 31 Bcf in the Consuming East Region and 19 Bcf in the Producing
Region. These changes represent 1.6 percent and 2.1 percent of inventories
in the respective regions. Revisions to total stocks and those stocks in the
Consuming East Region and the Producing Region in any other week are 1.6
percent or less. However, revisions to the data for the Consuming West
Region have a higher relative impact, partly owing to the smaller working
gas volumes for that region.
Revisions to Weekly Data from the EIA-912 Survey. On June 20, 2002, the
weekly working gas stock estimates from the EIA-912 survey were revised for
all weeks from March 15, 2002, through June 7, 2002. These changes represent
an increase of 30 Bcf on average for all weeks from March 15 to June 7. As a
result of the revisions, inventories in all three regions are higher. The
average change for U.S. total inventories is less than 2 percent. The
largest average revision occurred in the East Region, where the stocks
increased by 3.2 percent. Revisions occurred in inventory levels for all
weeks and consequently had little effect on the net change estimates, which
reflect the movement in inventory estimates for two consecutive weeks. The
revisions to weekly estimates were the result of revised data reports and
the use of updated ratios for expansion of the sample reports. The use of
ratios based on monthly surveys is explained in the Methodolog


(See attached file: HPLN0227.xls)

 - HPLN0227.xls


Attached is list for Bush's transition advisory  teams- notably, we're absent
from all but Commerce(Sandherr) and Energy(Lay).

From: Lara Leibman on 01/02/2001 10:57 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: [aaiadvisoryboard] aai- Transition Teams

In case you'd like the electronic version, here it is . . .
----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 10:57 AM -----

	bfoer@aol.com
	01/02/2001 10:32 AM

		 To: aaiadvisoryboard@egroups.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: [aaiadvisoryboard] aai- Transition Teams

I am attaching in pdf the membership of the Bush transition teams. With
respect to the Justice Dept, the only friendly faces seem to be Jamie
Gorelick and James Rill. There is no listing for FTC. Let me know if I am
missing anyone who might be friendly. BERT

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
aaiadvisoryboard-unsubscribe@egroups.com

 - aai- Bush Ad- Transition teams.pdf


I forwarded the email to GE and received no comment back.

Kay

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 12/10/2000 02:22 PM
To: "Taylor, Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Lisa Bills (E-mail)"
<Lisa.Bills@enron.com>, "Roseann M Engeldorf (E-mail)"
<Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>, "Bunk, Sean" <seanbunk@akllp.com>, "Sheila
Tweed (E-mail)" <Sheila.Tweed@enron.com>

Subject: Re: Winston & Strawn Comment: Consents to Assignment

Kay mentioned to me (I think it was on Friday) that she may be talking to GE
about this - don't know if she did or what the outcome was, so stay tuned.

Thanks,

Rose

	"Taylor, Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com>
	12/08/2000 12:12 PM

		 To: "Roseann M Engeldorf (E-mail)" <Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>, "Kay Mann
(E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Sheila Tweed (E-mail)"
<Sheila.Tweed@enron.com>, "Lisa Bills (E-mail)" <Lisa.Bills@enron.com>
		 cc: "Bunk, Sean" <seanbunk@akllp.com>
		 Subject: Winston & Strawn Comment: Consents to Assignment

Winston & Strawn has asked that the following be added to the Consents
to Assignment (e.g., in the "Successors and Assigns" paragraph):

"WestLB is an express third-party beneficiary of this Consent."

Please forward the revised draft of the GE Consent to Winston & Strawn
(toxley@winston.com).

Regards,

Rob Taylor
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis Street
Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002

Tel: (713) 220-4436
Fax: (713) 238-7273
e-mail: robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
(i) do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents hereof to others
(any of the foregoing being strictly prohibited), (ii) notify the sender
immediately of your receipt hereof, and (iii) delete this e-mail and all
copies of it.


Just a reminder.  Classes begin Monday the 15th.  They will be in room 3321 from 3 to 4.
Thanks,

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mahmassani, Souad
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:05 PM
To:	Plachy, Denver; Cuilla, Martin; Storey, Geoff; Yawapongsiri, Virawan; Kinsey, Lisa; Donohoe, Tom; Ruscitti, Kevin; Lewis, Andrew H.; Williams, Jason (Trading); Frihart, Bryant; Tucker, Patrick; Giron, Darron C.; Pollan, Sylvia S.; Murrell, Russell E; Culotta, Lindsay; O'Malley, Justin; Love, Phillip M.
Cc:	Luce, Laura; Hogan, Irena D.; Shively, Hunter S.
Subject:	RE: Classes

Classes have been moved.  We will begin classes on 15th and end on the 26th.
Thanks
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mahmassani, Souad
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:47 PM
To:	Plachy, Denver; Cuilla, Martin; Storey, Geoff; Yawapongsiri, Virawan; Kinsey, Lisa; Donohoe, Tom; Ruscitti, Kevin; Lewis, Andrew H.; Williams, Jason (Trading); Frihart, Bryant; Tucker, Patrick; Giron, Darron C.; Pollan, Sylvia S.; Murrell, Russell E; Culotta, Lindsay; O'Malley, Justin; Love, Phillip M.
Cc:	Shively, Hunter S.; Luce, Laura
Subject:	Classes

I spoke to the professors and we decided that the Midcontinent class will be held Monday's and Wednesday's from 3:00 to 4:00, Ontario class will be held Tuesday's and Thursday's at the same time.

Classes will commence Monday 8, 2001, and will continue until Thursday 19, 2001.  Midcontinent test will be held on Monday the 22nd and Ontario test will be held on Tuesday the 23rd.

Please e-mail any suggestions, conflict, registry.

Thanks


Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

Get over 100-pages of daily tracked and verified e-commerce utility-related
information with SCIENTECH's E-Commerce InfoGrid.  This unique Strategic and
Competitive Intelligence tool will help you stay on top of the torrent of
e-commerce information news and analysis. Don't miss this opportunity to find
out what's happening in the field of utility e-commerce.  Download a free
sample and order your InfoGrid today at www.ConsultRCI.com or contact Chris
Vigil at 505-244-7605.

The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH. The Wall Map measures 42" x
72"; the Executive Map Set consists of 18 11" x 17" maps. Visit our website
at www.ConsultRCI.com for a detailed description of these valuable maps and
complete ordering instructions.
For advertising information, email Nancy Spring, or call (505)244-7613.

[IMAGE]

IssueAlert for  March 2, 2001

Enron Develops New Wind Facility in Texas

by Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

Enron Wind and Enron Power Marketing, Inc. (EPMI), affiliates of Enron Corp.
(NYSE: ENE) announced completion of a transaction in which Enron Wind will
build a 135-MW wind power facility near Iraan, Texas, in Pecos County. Under
a related agreement, EPMI will purchase the project's electricity under a
long-term agreement for resale into the Texas wholesale electricity market.
This will be the first major wind facility that allows wholesale customers to
purchase portions of the wind power production. In the past, customers
interested in purchasing "green power" were often forced to commit to 100
percent of a project's output over the 20-year life of the equipment.

Analysis: I have suggested before that Texas arguably represents the most
active market for wind power in the United States. Enron's expansion of its
wind power assets in the state should further support the growth of
competition of wind power in this market, as the state gears up for the start
of competition in January 2002. Yet, while Enron Wind expands its presence in
the market and prepares to sell wind-generated electricity on Texas'
wholesale market, several other companies also have established a significant
presence in the state's booming wind power business.

Enron Wind, a subsidiary of Enron Corp., has been in existence for about 20
years. The company designs and constructs wind power facilities around the
world, comprising more than 4,500 wind turbines and 1,600 MW of capacity.
According to information from the company, Enron Wind's manufacturing
facilities in California, Germany and Spain "develop and manufacture
state-of-the-art wind turbines technology ranging from 750 kW to 2.0 MW."
Reportedly, Enron Wind's 1.5 MW Series turbine is the largest wind turbine
manufactured in the United States and was the first of its size class to be
manufactured for the global wind power market. The Enron Wind 1.5 wind
turbine utilizes a variable speed, constant frequency design and a
custom-designed airfoil, resulting in enhanced reliability and durability due
to reduced mechanical loads, higher energy capture and lower noise signature
than conventional fixed speed turbines.

The new project in Iraan, Texas, which is still unnamed, will consist of 90
Enron Wind 1.5 MW wind turbines and is expected to be completed by late 2001.
Enron Wind claims that the project will supply approximately 520,000 megawatt
hours of clean electricity each year, enough to supply the annual residential
needs of approximately 50,000 average American homes.

Enron Wind already has one wind facility operating in Texas, which is in fact
located only 10 miles away from the new facility in Iraan. The Indian Mesa I
facility is a 25.5 MW wind power generating facility also located in Pecos
County. In July 2000, Enron Wind entered into a long-term agreement with City
Public Service (CPS) of San Antonio to provide 100-percent output from the
Indian Mesa I facility to the west Texas utility grid. Electricity produced
from the Indian Mesa I facility reportedly is offered by CPS to individual
retail customers such as Windtricityv, which is CPS' first renewable energy
product offering.

In addition to these two Texas facilities, Enron Wind also has developed,
constructed and operated wind power facilities in Iowa (Storm Lake, 193 MW),
Minnesota (Lake Benton 1, 107 MW, and Lake Benton 2, 104 MW), and California
(Cabazon, 40 MW, and Green Power 1, 16.5 MW). In all of these facilities,
Enron Wind has established long-term contracts to sell 100 percent of the
electricity generated at the wind facility to a local utility. As noted, the
new facility being planned in west Texas represents a new approach for Enron
Wind, as electricity output from the facility will be sold in portions to a
variety of wholesale customers in the Texas market.

Over the last year, there has been a sharp increase in wind power projects in
Texas, mostly being built in the western part of the state. At last report,
186 MW of wind generation was already in operation in the state, with close
to 400 MW recently announced or planned. As a result, Texas is experiencing a
"wind boom" and is well on its way toward the 2,000 MW of renewable energy
capacity required under the state's Renewables Portfolio Standard.

For example, last September TXU Electric & Gas, a subsidiary of TXU,
announced an agreement to purchase renewable energy from a planned 82.5 MW
wind farm in west Texas. TXU Electric & Gas' share of the project will be
31.5 MW. The project marked the company's third major purchase of wind power
energy. Earlier in 2000, TXU Electric & Gas formed a partnership with FPL
Energy to build 242 wind turbines south of Odessa, Texas, which will supply
500 million kWh of electricity per year to approximately 29,000 homes. That
project followed similar development in Big Spring, Texas, including eight
wind turbines that are each capable of generating 1,650 kW of power.

As an energy supplier, TXU Electric & Gas has obtained a great deal of its
wind power by partnering with FPL Energy*the largest generator of wind power
in the United States*which serves on many of the new projects in west Texas.
FPL Energy is a fast-growing, unregulated power producer that is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of FPL Group. Among the more than 3,000 MW net
generating capacity that FPL Energy now has, the company focuses on "clean"
technologies. Wind power now accounts for about 15 percent of FPL Energy's
generation portfolio.

The projects by TXU Electric & Gas represented the largest wind power
projects in the world until late August, when Reliant Energy announced what
it claimed to be the world's largest single wind power installation.
Reliant's wind power project, slated to become operational in the fourth
quarter of 2001, will be located on King Mountain, near McCamey in far west
Texas. Reliant says that the project will be able to produce 250 MW of
electricity that will be sold into Texas' power grid. (Note: The Reliant wind
project has now been eclipsed by a joint, 300-MW wind project between
PacifiCorp and FPL Energy in Walla Walla, Wash. However, I am focused only on
the Texas market in this column).

Thus, Enron faces stiff competition when selling its wind power into the
Texas wholesale market. Enron joins TXU Electric & Gas, FPL Energy and
Reliant as the four companies that are vying to gain a leadership role over
the limited areas of the state where the wind blows at speeds of 14.5 miles
per hour or higher (the minimum to make a wind project cost effective).

Why is there so much development related to wind power taking place in Texas?
A number of factors are making the state a strong market for wind. The first
factor is nature itself: Texas is one of the handful of states along the Sun
Belt and Southwest regions that offer an abundance of wind. Some reports
indicate that average annual wind speeds in west Texas are 18 miles per hour.
Second, deregulation legislation in the state resulted in the Texas
Renewables Portfolio Standard, which until the end of 2001 is providing a
federal tax credit for companies that produce electricity from wind. The
deregulation law in Texas is considered the most supportive of renewable
forms of energy when compared to the 24 states that have enacted legislation
for electric competition. The pro-renewables stance is perhaps attributed to
the fact that a variety of environmental lobbying groups*including the
Environmental Defense group and the Texas Renewable Energy Industries
Association*were included in the dialogue when Texas was forming its law. In
addition, more efficient technology has lowered prices for wind-generated
electricity, while costs associated with natural gas have remained high. Add
all that to the fact that customers in the Lone Star State have a
comparatively high desire for wind power*along with other strong markets such
as California, Iowa and Minnesota. Consequently, Texas has proven to be an
enticing region for companies like Enron Wind and its competitors in the
state's wind power market.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.ConsultRCI.com

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


Linda:
I am a medium.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Linda J Noske
	09/06/00 01:48 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert H
George/SA/Enron@Enron, James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara N
Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Martin W
Penkwitz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart
Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A
Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J
Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT,
Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen E
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Jane
McBride/AP/Enron@Enron, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT, Matthias
Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L
Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gloria Cruz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Twanda
Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: LEGAL CONFERENCE - SHIRT SIZE

PLEASE FORWARD YOUR SHIRT SIZE TO ME (S, M, L, XL, ETC.) AS SOON AS POSSIBLE,
BUT NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2000.

THANK YOU!!!!


In Idaho, Western states press feds to act on power prices
H. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, April 10, 2001
,2001 Associated Press
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2001/04/10/nation
al1812EDT0713.DTL
(04-10) 18:04 PDT BOISE, Idaho (AP) -- High electricity prices pose a
``looming disaster'' for many states in the West, a federal regulator warned
Tuesday, as pressure grew on the government to consider temporary price
controls on wholesale power.
Officials from 11 Western states, including energy-ravaged California,
engaged in sometimes passionate exchanges with three members of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission over how to contain soaring power prices that
are expected to go only higher this summer.
``Something has to be done to tame this market,'' Geoffrey Brown, a member of
the California Public Utilities Commission, told the three FERC
commissioners. California anticipates paying $65 billion for electricity this
year, almost 10 times its power bill in 1999.
But after the daylong session, the FERC seemed to be not much closer to
imposing price caps than before, although one commissioner, Linda Breathitt,
said she now wants to look the issue more carefully and might be swayed.
FERC Chairman Curtis Hebert, a strong free-market advocate, reiterated his
fear that price regulation would drive off investors for new power
generation. Under FERC rules, it would be Hebert's discretion when or if to
propose a price cap for deliberation.
Commissioner William Massey, who has been in the minority on the commission
in recommending price controls, said the ``passion for markets must be
tempered with common sense.''
``We face a looming disaster,'' he declared, if wholesale electricity markets
are allowed to continue on a path that has wholesale power in many parts of
the West selling for 10 times what it cost just a year ago.
Hebert insisted that the FERC ``is doing everything it can'' to ensure just
and reasonable prices and cited the commission's action to seek $124 million
in refunds on California power sales. He also said the commission plans soon
to approve a new system of tracking market abuses.
The chairman noted that state officials at the meeting were sharply divided
over whether the government should regulate electricity prices. Keeping tabs
as each participant gave a presentation, he said three states were for them,
five against and three uncertain.
Hebert's anti-controls position drew support from Vice President Dick Cheney
in a telephone interview with Associated Press reporter David Ammons in
Olympia, Wash.
``The problem with price caps,'' Cheney said, ``is that they don't solve the
problem. Just look at California, where they had caps applied at the retail
level that, coupled with the requirement to buy power on the spot market, has
driven PG&E into bankruptcy.''
Pacific Gas & Electric, California's largest utility, said last week it had
debts of $9 billion and filed for protection from its creditors under chapter
11 of federal bankruptcy laws.
California, whose electricity problems have unleashed soaring power prices
throughout the West, urged FERC to immediately impose an 18-month cost-based
price cap in the Western markets.
``We have done our part. We cannot do it alone,'' said Bob Hertzberg, speaker
of the California Assembly. He cited state actions to boost conservation,
increase retail rates and speed up power plant construction and said there is
``no earthly reason'' why energy prices should be 10 times what they were a
year ago.
Still, California officials expressed little optimism after the hearing.
``It would take a dramatic, unprecedented change of direction'' for the FERC
to adopt price controls, said Fred Keeley, speaker pro tem in the California
Assembly, who was in the audience during the six-hour meeting.
Breathitt, the FERC's third commissioner, who has not come out in favor of
price caps, nevertheless indicated she might be inching toward some controls.
She said she wants the commission to ``seriously discuss a price
implementation plan.''
The issue may end up, however, being decided by two new commissioners
recently nominated by President Bush -- Pat Wood, now head of the Texas
utility commission, and Nora Brownell, a Pennsylvania regulator.
Both are viewed as free market advocates, but pro-controls commissioner
Massey said he believes they might be swayed to accept temporary price
restraints if the electricity market reels further out of control. Neither
nominee has yet been confirmed by the Senate.
While divided on price controls, most of the state officials at the unusual
FERC meeting expressed worries that the federal agency was doing too little
to address problems in the power markets.
The chairman of Montana's utility commission, Gary Feland, who opposes price
controls, criticized FERC for lack of aggressiveness in challenging
unreasonable prices. FERC is legally mandated to ensure ``just and
reasonable'' wholesale power prices.
``Montana is taking a hell of a hit'' from electricity prices, Feland said.
``Politically we're getting beat up.''
Steve Ellenbecker, a utility commissioner from Wyoming, urged the federal
regulators to come up with a ``reasonable measure'' short of a price cap to
deal with the troubled electricity market.
Many of the state officials said the full impact of the high wholesale power
prices have yet to hit consumers. In many cases state officials must still
give permission for utilities to pass them on to retail customers.
On the Net: FERC Web site: www.ferc.fed.us/
,2001 Associated Press ?


Thanks for the note, that's me.

We have friends in Russia as we speak adopting a girl that was hosted in the summer of 2000. We still have two to get back. Would love the opportunity to visit. We will keep you in our prayers.

God bless

Dan

Dan O. Boyle
Vice President
Enron Global Finance
Phone:   713-853-1532
Mobile:  713-417-3532


I'll be on the call.  Hope all's well on your end.
Best,
Jeff

	Jeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate
	05/14/2001 09:15 AM

		 To: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, mbaldwin@igservice.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: I9907003 Ruling re Notice of a Full Panel Hearing

Team,
Let's shoot for Tuesday, May 15, at 2:00 p.m. CDT, 12: 00 noon, PDT.  Mark,
we'll call you.  Jeff, I don't know if you're available, but if you've got a
spare minute, it'd probably be a good idea for us to rally by phone before
the Hearing.  Glen, I'll call you also.

Kim, Steve, if you guys want to sit-in, we'll make the call from one of the
offices.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  mbaldwin@igservice.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-mbaldwin+40igservice+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 6:27 PM
To: Fawcett, Jeffery
Subject: RE: I9907003 Ruling re Notice of a Full Panel Hearing

Jeff, I am available Tuesday 12 noon to 1:30 pm or first thing Wednesday
morning or almost all afternoon Wednesday. Monday , I am traveling. Mark,
IGS    Have a great weekend.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fawcett, Jeffery [mailto:Jeffery.Fawcett@ENRON.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 3:27 PM
> To: Dasovich, Jeff; mbaldwin@igservice.com; Hass, Glen
> Cc: Harris, Steven
> Subject: I9907003 Ruling re Notice of a Full Panel Hearing
>
>
> Team,
> Looks like things are finally coming home to roost here.  I would argue
> that we (TW and Enron) should both consider getting our 5-minute sound
> bite in here since we're being afforded the opportunity.  Obviously, our
> goal should be to see the Commission adopt the Comprehensive Settlement.
> Our focus point during our presentation should be on not only the
> sufficiency of infrastructure (not dealt with specfically in the
> Comprehensive Settlement) but the idea that there must be a concomitant
> unbundling of the intrastate transmission and a rational, equitable
> means to allocate capacity at receipt points and an orderly assignment
> of firm rights to shippers (primary/secondary).  Let's put together a
> short teleconference to work out our strategy here and make sure we're
> on the agenda for May 22.
>
> Will you guys send me a note back and let me know your availabilty Mon.,
> Tues. or Wed.?
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:  Scott, Susan
> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:31 PM
> > To: Hass, Glen; Fawcett, Jeffery
> > Subject: FW: I9907003 Ruling re Notice of a Full Panel Hearing
> >
> >
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:  "Susanto, Gaby" <t94@cpuc.ca.gov>@ENRON
> > [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Susanto+2C+20Gaby+22+20+3Ct94+40cpuc+2Eca+2Egov+
> > 3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 1:57 PM
> > To: 'skatz@sempratrading.com'; 'kmccrea@sablaw.com';
> > 'thompson@wrightlaw.com'; 'johnj@bcjlaw.com'; 'sscott3@enron.com';
> > 'trdill@westernhubs.com'; 'ghinners@reliantenergy.com';
> > 'tdickers@westerngas.com'; 'mark.c.moench@wgp.twc.com';
> > 'andy.bettwy@swgas.com'; 'johnwalley@swgas.com';
> > 'napedersen@jonesday.com'; 'rpetti@ladwp.com';
> > 'eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us'; 'slins@ci.glendale.ca.us';
> > 'bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us'; 'roger.pelote@williams.com';
> > 'douglas.porter@sce.com'; 'gloria.ing@sce.com'; 'burkee@cts.com';
> > 'jleslie@luce.com'; 'gsullivan@sempra.com'; 'jsteffen@iid.com';
> > 'haorndorff@aeraenergy.com'; 'kbhensman@aeraenergy.com';
> > 'mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com'; 'bfinkelstein@turn.org'; Farrar,
> > Darwin; McNamara, Michael D.; Gileau, Patrick L.; 'joseh@lif.org';
> > 'joseh@lif.org'; 'chj@a-klaw.com'; 'ek@a-klaw.com'; 'evk1@pge.com';
> > 'epoole@adplaw.com'; 'bcragg@gmssr.com'; 'chilen@llgm.com';
> > 'jmct@gmssr.com'; 'jkarp@whitecase.com'; 'jkarp@whitecase.com';
> > 'lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com'; 'rick.counihan@greenmountain.com';
> > 'mday@gmssr.com'; 'edwardoneill@dwt.com';
> > 'grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us';
> > 'raveen_maan@cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us'; 'rochmanm@cubjpa.org';
> > 'jcattermole@pcenergy.com'; 'igsinc@ix.netcom.com';
> > 'craigc@calpine.com'; 'gtbl@dynegy.com'; 'joe.paul@dynegy.com';
> > 'kfyip@seiworldwide.com'; 'davef@abag.ca.gov'; 'garyb@abag.ca.gov';
> > 'ceyap@earthlink.net'; 'askaff@energy-law-group.com';
> > 'pjpowerlaw@aol.com'; 'tomb@crossborderenergy.com'; 'jweil@aglet.org';
> > 'dcarroll@dbsr.com'; 'ed@clfp.com'; 'jtachera@energy.state.ca.us';
> > 'gtbl@dynegy.com'; 'iep@iepa.com'; 'lmh@eslawfirm.com';
> > 'kmills@cfbf.com'; 'ron_oechsler@rmiinc.com'; 'alan_reid@pcp.ca';
> > 'rfoss@coral-energy.com'; 'tom.roth@et.pge.com'; 'ronknecht@aol.com';
> > 'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'; 'aod@newsdata.com';
> > 'rgloistein@orrick.com'; 'salleyoo@dwt.com'; 'igsinc@ix.netcom.com';
> > 'rbw@mrwassoc.com'; 'rczahar@aol.com'; 'stomashe@energy.state.ca.us';
> > 'karen@klindh.com'; Stevens, Maria E.; 'jwr@cpuc.ca.gov'; Quan, Edwin;
> > Wong, John S.; Myers, Richard A.; Pocta, Robert M.; White, Rosalina;
> > Sarvate, Sarita; Horner, Trina; Beck, Valerie;
> > 'mjaske@energy.state.ca.us'; 'bwood@energy.state.ca.us'
> > Cc: Susanto, Gaby; Wong, John S.; Bilas, Richard A.
> > Subject: I9907003 Ruling re Notice of a Full Panel Hearing
> >
> >  - CPUC01-#97463-v1-I9907003_Bilas_Ruling_.doc
> > <<CPUC01-#97463-v1-I9907003_Bilas_Ruling_.doc>>
>


We can look at your documents, however, we are unable to open the one you have sent previously.  Will you resend them?

Thanks!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Ishikawa, Angie - TPAGI" <AIshikawa@socalgas.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Ishikawa+2C+20Angie+20-+20TPAGI+22+20+3CAIshikawa+40socalgas+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:55 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: ISDA Master Agreement

Hi Marie,
Our attorney has been on vacation most of this month, and unfortunately, we have not had the chance to review of your proposed ISDA documents.  Would it be possible for you to review our docs?  It will certainly help us out since we currently have a back log of unsigned ISDA contracts.  Please advise.
Thanks, Angie
-----Original Message-----
From: Heard, Marie [mailto:Marie.Heard@ENRON.com << File: mailto:Marie.Heard@ENRON.com >> ]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:45 PM
To: aishikawa@socalgas.com
Cc: Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement
Hi, Angie!
I am just writing to check on the status of your review of the draft
ISDA Master Agreement I forwarded to you.  Will you please let me know
when you anticipate sending your comments?
Thanks!
Marie
Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
marie.heard@enron.com
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Thanks for the copy of the draft Agreements. Do you have a Local Currency -
Single Jurisdiction version of this agreement? Since this is a single, one
time transaction that would be a better agreement for us. Thanks


<<Re remove cat urine from an area rug.htm>>

 - Re remove cat urine from an area rug.htm


People,

The Fundy site now has updated price indices for both the east and west desks.  "EOM Price Index" is now "EOM East Price Index" and for the west desk, it is Price Data/EOM West Price Index.  Feel free to give me a shout if you have further queries.

Lindon
x57758

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Boyle, Sean
Sent:	Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:43 AM
To:	Taylor, John Craig; DePaolis, Tammi; Versen, Victoria; Townsend, Judy; Germany, Chris; Goodell, Scott; Junek, Dan; Hendrickson, Scott; Hodge, John; Neal, Scott; Ring, Andrea; Pereira, Susan; Brawner, Sandra; Keavey, Peter; McKay, Brad; Pimenov, Vladi; Barbe, Robin; Smith, Maureen
Cc:	Colin Tonks/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Chiu, Lindon
Subject:	W/A FP for May Ticker

The real time weighted average price for fixed price products for May can be found on the Fundy site under Price Data/EOM Price Index.  Let me know if you have any questions.
Note: If the product has not traded it will not show in the list.

Thanks to Colin Tonks and Lindon Chiu for your help.


Funny how it works, but one of my clients I am doing a year-end deal for also
found out before I told her.  HORRIBLE.  Oh well.  I guess I need to spill
the beans faster.

Are you all going on to Ted's dinner party on Saturday?  Sheryl.

Sheryl A. Gussett
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
711 Louisiana, Suite 2900
Houston, Texas 77002-2781
(713) 221-1210
(713) 221-2132 (fax)
sgussett@bracepatt.com

>>> <Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com> 12/07/00 10:47AM >>>

absolutely.  see you on sat around 530.

ps - wildfires not just there - I've heard as well over here.
Congratulations


Wednesday, April 25 at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Sherri Sera, executive
assistant to Jeff Skilling, on eSpeak.  Sherri will answer questions about
how her job has changed since Jeff became CEO.

If you can't make the live event, post your questions on eSpeak now.  Sherri
will answer them during her eSpeak, and you can find the answers in the
transcript later.

Have you been wondering what happened to the information about Enron's
severance pay policy?   Would you like to see an innovation suggestion for
the Saturn's ring that will connect the two Enron buildings?  Read the new
postings in the "Office of the Chairman" category in eMeet.

Thanks for the great response to the new "Cost Reduction" category in the
Idea Vault!  Visit the ThinkBank today and read the suggestions for cutting
costs; and, while you're there, add your own.


you guys suck


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/25/2001 04:18
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/25/2001 10:21 AM

To: Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Revised Option for North Carolina

Reagan,

Attached is the revised North Carolina form of Option.  It has been confirmed
that the Option renewal payments must not exceed 5% of the purchase price.

.


The MeOH plant  began having problems on June 30. On July 3, a flange fire on
piping occurred.  The piping could not be depressured and the plant was shut
down.  No eta for plant startup is available at this time.  Additional
information will be forwarded when available.


============================================================
Larry King Live at 9:00 p.m. ET
on Monday, January 7, 2002
============================================================
Tonight: In an exclusive primetime interview, the parents
of the first U.S. casualty from hostile fire in Afghanistan,
Wilbur and Lynn Chapman, join Larry to remember
their son. Sgt. 1st Class Nathan Chapman, 31, was
killed by small-arms fire in Afghanistan on Friday.

And in another primetime exclusive, Robin Reid, the
father of  "shoe bomb" suspect Richard Reid, joins
Larry live from London.  Richard Reid, 28, is suspected
of trying to ignite plastic explosives in his shoes aboard
a U.S.-bound commercial airplane last month.

Other guests on tonight's program include Sens. Richard
Lugar, R-Ind., and Pete Domenici, R-N.M., and former Sen.
Sam Nunn.  Plus, we'll get a live report from the frontlines
in Afghanistan and we're taking your calls.

See you tonight at 9 Eastern!

Visit http://www.cnn.com/larryking and send us your show ideas.
=============================================================
=============================================================
To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE to any CNN EMAIL service visit:
http://cnn.com/EMAIL

Read our privacy guidelines at:
http://cnn.com/privacy.html

(c) 2002 Cable News Network, Inc.
A Time Warner Company
All Rights Reserved.

======================================================
To unsubscribe, click here:
http://cgi.cnn.com/cgi-bin/mail/clik?email=kenneth.lay@enron.com&list=larryking
This message was sent to you at kenneth.lay@enron.com


Ben,

Here's what you requested.  I do not recommend this MOU, as there are several
problems with it,

Is there something I can help you with?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/16/2001 01:14
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
03/29/2001 10:30 AM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: term sheet & mou

Per your request.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/29/2001 10:30
AM ---------------------------
From: Ozzie Pagan/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 12:10 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: term sheet & mou

 -----Original Message-----
From:  David_Camardese@fpl.com@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-David+5FCamardese+40fpl+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 6:15 PM
To: Pagan, Ozzie
Cc: Joe_Stepenovitch@fpl.com; Ed_Tammy@fpl.com; Paul_A_Karns@fpl.com
Subject: term sheet & mou

ozzie, see you tomorrow around 9:30am -  we can discuss attachments in
detail then.

(See attached file: Homestead PPA MOU.doc)(See attached file: 000321
homestead plant indicative bid.doc)
 - Homestead PPA MOU.doc
 - 000321 homestead plant indicative bid.doc


Lincoln Police obviosly have a automatic link to the press.  Or the press is pinging the rap sheets daily.  This is not news.  Don't tell me no aggies ever have fights with their girlfriends or punch out a guy over a girl.  Its only news because of Local papers and police want it to be.  Call the College Station Police and ask if any football players have been involved in any "assaults".  They'd probably tell you its not your business.  This brown thing is funny because the new boyfriend kicked his ass.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Jeffrey
Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:46 AM
To:	Platter, Phillip
Cc:	Day, Smith L.
Subject:	What is in the water in the Nebraska Football Program?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/college/news/2001/06/19/nebraska_brown_ap/

The character of the NU football players is impressive.


Attached are the files for the PGG 3rd current estimate. Please take a look at the comments and footnotes. We are assuming the goodwill transfer to ENA as of 7/1, and have given them the amortization to include in their forecast. Let me know if you have any questions.

Carolyn Winowitch
PGE Accounting
503-464-8191


[IMAGE]

   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]     	 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]          Updated: Oct. 18, 2001     [IMAGE]      [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]           Pacific Northwest action prevented shortages  The Pacific Northwest, despite severe trials and tribulations, survived the unprecedented energy crisis that engulfed most of the western United States, a report by regional planning officials said. [IMAGE] [IMAGE]         [IMAGE]     [IMAGE] [IMAGE]       [IMAGE]      [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]           [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]            [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]            [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]            [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]            [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]            [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]            [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]            [IMAGE]             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]            [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]           [IMAGE] [IMAGE]             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]          [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]       Deregulation of EU gas markets slow  DRI-WEFA study examines market flaws  Obstacles still exist to competition    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]       Cheap hydro dries up Nordic countries search for new options  Interconnectors could help  Customer participation forces prices down   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE]             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]       Is hydrogen poised for market acceleration? Fuel cells could lead to decreased oil dependence  The 'chicken and egg' infrastructure dilemma   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]        [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   AGA: U.S. working gas in storage up 63 Bcf  full story...   KMP distribution up 29%; net income increases 66% full story...   Expect EPA's utility emission position by year's end full story...   Florida examining allowing merchant plants full story...   Plug Power cuts jobs full story...   Duke backs away from Brazilian deal full story...   AES drops bid for four Armenian power grids full story...   Williams Communications signs deal with Progress Telecom full story...   H2fuel technology could reduce cost of hydrogen production full story...   Panda Energy, Alliant Energy form JV full story...   To view all of today's Executive News headlines,  click here               [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]         [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Copyright ? 2001 - Platts, All Rights Reserved   [IMAGE]   Market Brief  Wednesday, October 17  Stocks Close Change % Change DJIA 9,232.97 (151.3) -1.61% DJ 15 Util. 314.97 (3.6) -1.12% NASDAQ 1,646.34 (75.73) -4.40% S&P 500 1,076.28 (21.3) -1.94%     Market Vols Close Change % Change AMEX (000) 219,425 82,234.0  59.94% NASDAQ (000) 2,289,678 444,835.0  24.11% NYSE (000) 1,443,498 239,133.0  19.86%     Commodities Close Change % Change Crude Oil (Nov) 21.79 (0.21) -0.95% Heating Oil (Nov) 0.621 (0.006) -0.91% Nat. Gas (Henry) 2.44 (0.152) -5.86% Propane (Nov) 40.4 (0.100) -0.25% Palo Verde (Nov) 28.00 0.75  2.75% COB (Nov) 29.00 0.00  0.00% PJM (Nov) 27.25 0.25  0.93%     Dollar US $ Close Change % Change Australia $  1.948 (0.002) -0.10% Canada $   1.568 0.004  0.26% Germany Dmark  2.169 0.018  0.84% Euro   0.9034 (0.004) -0.48% Japan ?en  121.30 0.000  0.00% Mexico NP 9.24 0.040  0.43% UK Pound   0.6917 0.0011  0.16%     Foreign Indices Close Change % Change Arg MerVal 251.61 8.46  3.48% Austr All Ord. 3,170.00 24.20  0.77% Braz Bovespa 11271.49 13.64  0.12% Can TSE 300  6956.8 (70.09) -1.00% Germany DAX 4706.07 79.59  1.72% HK HangSeng 10260.81 112.32  1.11% Japan Nikkei 225  10755.45 117.63  1.11% Mexico IPC  5541.88 (0.73) -0.01% UK FTSE 100 5,203.40 120.80  2.38%      Source:  Yahoo! & TradingDay.com    	     [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]          [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]

 - bug_black.gif
 - Market briefs.xls


Joe,

This is what I have worked up so far, let me know if you have any other issues I can address in the summary.

Mike


Dorothy -

I spoke to Rebeka this morning regarding that administrative position.  I'm
not quite sure how it went but I want to thank you for speaking to her on my
behalf.  Although she is looking to fill this position within the next two
weeks, she mentioned that if this didn't work out for me that she would
forward my resume to the HR Recruiter, Dianne White.  And if I may ask,  just
keep me in your prayers.  Thanks again.

Dana


With the recent movement in long term interest rates, I thought I would update you on Enron's exposure to Greenfield. Enron has a long term interest rate swap (which is in the money to Enron) in place with Greenfield, which has recently appreciated considerably. Preserving the value of this swap has become our top priority.

This is a quick summary of Enron's exposure to Greenfield.

Greenfield (In order of seniority):
Senior Debt			110mn
Additional Sponsor Loans	55mn (Not yet funded)
ECT Interest Rate Swap		16mn
Shareholder Loans		9mn
Equity				55mn
Total				245mn

Enron Exposure (In order of seniority):
Additional Sponsor Loans 	11mn (Not yet funded, no obligation to do so)
ECT Interest Rate Swap		16mn
Shareholder Loans		2.4mn
Equity				11mn
Total				29.4mn (Excluding Additional Sponsor Loan)

Current discussions center around a sale of the vessel to a third party. El Paso have recently submitted a letter indicating a potential bid of 210-215 million. If this sale were to be completed, Enron would recover the swap breakage of 16mn and the Shareholder loan of 2.4mn entirely, and would recover approximaetly $4 million of equity, resulting in an overall write off of approximately $7mn. The timing of this transaction is not yet certain, but our intention would be to delay until Q102. A sale to a third party at this level would represent the best possible solution for Enron, and our efforts are concentrated in this area

In discussions held last week with Jim Hughes, Jim indicated that he thought it was appropriate that his group should bear the loss associated with this transaction, as it was originally entered into because of Dabhol. The Global LNG group and the Finance group will continue to push as hard as possible to resolve this matter in the best interests of Enron, and we remain in constant liaison with the DPC group.

Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions.

Thanks,
Jonathan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: djenergy
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 4:17 PM
> Cc: Onukogu, Ernest
> Subject: DJ NP 15/SP 15 Electricity Price Index
>
>  <<NP 15 pages.xls>>  <<SP 15 pages.xls>>

 - NP 15 pages.xls
 - SP 15 pages.xls


Below is a brief filing to FERC that points out several continued
deficiencies in APS' compliance filing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001
08:32 AM ---------------------------

"Farinella, Maria" <FarinellaM@dsmo.com>@dsmo.com> on 03/06/2001 04:38:53 PM
Sent by: "Hubbard, Norma" <HubbardN@dsmo.com>
To: "'teresabrown@duke-energy.com'" <teresabrown@duke-energy.com>,
"'cnicola@ect.enron.com'" <cnicola@ect.enron.com>
cc: "Schott, Gretchen" <SchottG@dsmo.com>, "Farinella, Maria"
<FarinellaM@dsmo.com>, "Safford, Carrie" <SaffordC@dsmo.com>

Subject: Filing made today

Enclosed please find the filing made today in the APS proceeding.  A hard
copy was sent to Teresa Brown and Christi Nicolay.  Thanks

Norma J. Hubbard
Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky

============================================================================Th
is e-mail message and any attached files are confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may
contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for
delivering this confidential communication to the intended recipient, you
have received this communication in error, and any review, use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of this
e-mail message and any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original
message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@dsmo.com

Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP
http://www.legalinnovators.com

 - APS compliance filing 3-1-01_.doc


Attached is the document reflecting the changes in the PRC Reps pursuant to
our conversation yesterday afternoon.  Please call if you need any additional
information.
Charlene
3-9233


Mr. Ross,
I am checking with Nidia Mendoza and we will respond to you shortly.

Stephanie Panus
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
Houston, Texas  77002
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490
email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gary Ross <GRoss@Quadraenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	Panus, Stephanie
Cc:	Patrick J. Loftus; Scott Simpson
Subject:	RE: ISDA Master Agreement

Ms. Panus,

A number of months ago you had sent me a draft Master Agreement and Credit
Support Annex.  I had then spoke with Nidia Mendoza, in the Enron Credit
department, regarding the changes we would like to see in the agreement.
However, I am having problems getting her to respond to my phone messages or
e-mails.

I am hoping I could detail the changes we have and  you could then let me
know if they are acceptable.

They are as follows:

Ms. Mendoza faxed me an alternate Letter of Credit format, which our Bank
finds more acceptable than SCHEDULE 1 to EXHIBIT A to paragraph 13 of Annex
A.

We would like to have this format replace the current SCHEDULE 1 or have it
added as SCHEDULE 2. This will guard against the format being disallowed at
a latter date.

Also, we would like to have the dollar amounts in point (b) (iv) (D) of
PARAGRAPH 13 to the ISDA CREDIT SUPPORT ANNEX reduced from $250,000 to
$10,000.  A $250,000 threshold is a very large number especially when you
consider that we would not be paid any interest, while Enron held any excess
funds. Also, the $10,000 amount is typical of the amount we use with other
trading houses of Enron's size.

Please let me know your thoughts on the above items. If you have any
questions please contact me, at (403) 215-7451.

Thank you

Gary Ross

-----Original Message-----
From: Panus, Stephanie [mailto:Stephanie.Panus@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 3:54 PM
To: gross@quadraenergy.com
Cc: Reves, Brant
Subject: ISDA Master Agreement

Mr. Ross,

Attached for your review is a draft of the ISDA Master Agreement between
Enron North America Corp. and Quadra Energy Trading Ltd.  Please note
that the actual Master Agreement and Credit Support Annex are preprinted
forms from ISDA and cannot be sent electronically.  Therefore, I am also
sending you the entire package via overnight delivery.

If you have any questions, please call me at the below number or Brent
Hendry, Senior Counsel, at 713-853-7124.  We look forward to hearing
your comments.

 <<163ctr(quadra).doc>>

Stephanie Panus
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3803C
Houston, Texas  77002
ph:  713.345.3249
fax:  713.646.3490
email:  stephanie.panus@enron.com


Thanks for the message from Pete.  He's a good guy!


Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041512.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred: -120.00 / Final: -100.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: WESC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:  30.00 / Final:   9.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Have you guys received any information from Gulf Power concerning regular
updates on the construction?  Jeff indicated that Gulf would be willing to
provide updates monthly.  If we haven't heard from Gulf, we need to push them
to provide this info.


That's one of the topics I wanted to address PRIORITARILY this afternoon.  According to Luis Otavio and Fred, customers A (alta tens?o, and demand greater than 2.5MW) will ONLY be allowed to sell "excess power" not consumed (capped at their "cota" or "meta" or quota) to OTHERS CONSUMERS, but not to MARKETERS.  The reason for this is that ANEEL/Parente don't want to "flood" MAE with positions to settle (the argument is, if MAE cannot manage 67 counterparties, they won't be able to manage several hundreds).  But it's crazy: all unbalanced (net) positions will be settled in spot market: if marketers are not allowed to act as intermediaries, there will be hundreds of net, bilateral positions to settle (and it WILL flood MAE), if marketers like Enron can be in the middle they will net themselves all positions on portfolio basis and they will show only ONE position in MAE.

This mechanism is no different from the often discussed concept of DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT.  The only way to make it work is to allow LIQUIDITY and therefore competition and therefore Marketers.

It is vital that Marketers be authorized to acquire and sell this power, and settle their net position (net position only) in spot market.  EOL will be a great tool for this, and we may accelerate its launch in Brazil with this new, different product ("Restricted Power")

Orlando Gonzalez
05/25/2001 08:52 AM
To:	Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, sergio.assad@enron.com, britaldo.soares@enron.com, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao.Carlos.Albuquerque@enron.com, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Miguel Padron/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:	John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject:	mae measures

One of the proposals under review with the Apag?o team is to allow the B and A costumers to access the Mae and transact their "contracted energy" after their respective 20-25% reduction targets.  The MAE and the distributors do not have the systems in place to deal  with over 1,800,000 customers in the entire system. Elektro alone has close to 150000 customers in this class.    This can be a tremendous oportunity for Enron on Line to take off.  Remi could you review and prepare an action plan urgently.  These measures are targeted to be released next week.


damn . . .
are you going to take that
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001 10:41 AM
---------------------------
To: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad
Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Class in Bluegrass

Excerpt from an article on espn.com

Given Kentucky's decades-long legacy of cheating in both basketball and
football,
                  ousting Mumme was a mandatory move. The school's image is
too fragile to
                  countenance keeping a coach with major violations on his
watch.

Enough said.


Mark,

Thanks a lot.

Vince

From:  Mark Ruane
04/26/2000 05:52 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: E&P model

Vince - attached is the most recent E&P version of the old corporate cash
flow model that I could find.  Note that "most recent" still dates it back a
few years.  A couple caveats:  I did try to clean it up somewhat from old
macros, but no guarntees offered.  Also, some of the underlying methodology
is not what we would probably currently use, such as for pricing, stochastic
processes, and perhaps decline rates.
Please let me know if I can provide any additional help.
Mark


Christmas is just one week away!

Time to get that last minute gift,
 an annual golf membership at Lake Windcrest Golf Club!

Right now, no initiation fee and monthly payments starting at $175.00!!   That includes golf, cart and unlimited range balls!

Please stop by to sign up, or call
Casey Wade or David Brock at 281-259-2279
Happy Holidays!


Group,

STWBOM is short tomorrow (07/31/01) on Peak in SP-15.  We are short 25 mws at $51.74.

STCALI is short 4 mws(?) on peak in SP-15 at $51.74. ST-CALI is long 24 mws off peak at a price of $25.

If you have questions, just let me know.

Thanks,
Bill


---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 12/14/99
06:58 PM ---------------------------

"Moler, Elizabeth" <emoler@velaw.com> on 12/10/99 03:17:35 PM
To: "'Runyan, John'" <john.runyan@ipaper.com>, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Joskow Paper on Industry Restructuring

Here's Paul Joskow's paper from the AEI/Brookings conference today.  Given
his stature in the industry, I think the quote on page 104 may be useful.

"I do not believe that in the long run the U.S. electric power sector can
exist and prosper with a checkerboard of competitive and non-competitive
states taking power from the same transmission networks, or even with a
large number of competitive states which have adopted a wide array of
different rules and institutions for wholesale and retail competition."

Cheers.

Betsy

 - Electricity.pdf


Barry,  I added a some language to th disclaimer.


Weather Headlines
Tuesday January 15, 2002
The battle rages on between the Hudson Bay polar vortex and the Caribbean
ridge. While widespread cold is still not likely, widespread storminess is.
I don't expect any large storms during the period, but a series of weak to
moderate ones appear likely. With the jet stream in a zonal flow, it gets
difficult to bring up much in the way of Gulf moisture. Therefore,
precipitation production is more a function of the dynamics of the storm
itself. Bottom line, nothing heavy for a while. This zonal flow is also
keeping the polar and subtropical jet streams separate and distinct. There
is plenty of cold air now on this side of the pole in Canada waiting for an
excuse to come South. but, it runs into a wall in the Northern U.S. Any
buckle of the jet stream looks to be confined to the Western U.S. over the
next several days and probably longer. That trough in the West looks fairly
weak so the temperature departures from normal are slight.
The 6-10 day outlook in my view features more of the same. There is
frustration in that Day 10 models continue to show the Southward
progression of arctic cold, but without any real change in the upper level
flow patterns. While I recognize cold air by weight can flow South on its
own, it is tough to get very far South. The NWS 6-10 day outlook is warm
virtually everywhere East of the Rockies. I am inclined to trim back the
Northern part of that to allow for that slow South drift of arctic air. In
addition this pattern may grow more favorable for Great Lakes enhanced
snows. But, without a large surface High to press South out of the Yukon
and with the Caribbean ridge still exerting an influence, I cannot see any
large scale cold outbreaks developing.
For the period Tuesday January 15 through Saturday January 19, expect the
following temperature trends:
Average 4 to 6-degrees below normal: Intermountain West...
Average 1 to 3- degrees below normal: Pacific NW, California, Northern and
Central Rockies...
Average 1 to 3-degrees above normal: Desert SW, Southern Rockies, Northern
and Central Plains, Great Lakes, Northeast...
Average 4 to 6-degrees above normal: Gulf Coast, Southeast, Mid-Atlantic,
Southern Plains , Ohio and Mississippi Valleys...
Andy Weingarten, Meteorologist APB Energy / True Quote