Thanks for the update.  Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Cc: Gadd, Eric; Kaminski, Vince
Subject: Re: FW: FW: Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Kim,

I talked to Dale early this morning and suggested that we meet during his
next trip to Houston
when we decide on timing of our project.

Vince

From: Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/01/2001 08:41 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Gadd/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: FW: Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Vince,

If Dale comes in to see you, it looks like Eric might be available to meet
with you as well.  It would be a good opportunity for Eric to meet Dale and
get a little more information on his model.  Eric's phone number is X54713.

Thanks,

Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Gadd, Eric
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 8:12 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: Re: FW: Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Works for me.  Give me a call at 9:30.

From: Kimberly Watson/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 05:09 PM
To: Eric Gadd/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Eric, FYI. Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 5:07 PM
To: dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com
Cc: Watson, Kimberly; Kaminski, Vince
Subject: Re: Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Dale,

Please, call me on Tuesday. My morning schedule is full but I am open in the
afternoon.

Vince

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
"Dale M. Nesbitt" <dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com> on 04/30/2001 01:51:21 AM
Please respond to <dale.nesbitt@marketpointinc.com>
To: "Vincent Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>, "Kimberly S. Watson"
<kwatson@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Get Together This Coming Tuesday?

Vince/Kim:

I am flying to Houston tonight and wondered if it would fit one or both of
your schedules to get together this coming Tuesday sometime for 1/2 hour or
so.  I really want to reinitiate the conversations MarketPoint was having
with John Goodpasture and you, and he said either or both of you were the
right people to continue after his responsibility shift.  John was quite
positive about the idea of Enron acquiring MarketPoint NARG through license,
and he implied that one or both of you would be carrying the ball in that
direction after he handed it to you.

Would this coming Tuesday morning at 930 am be a good time for you guys?  If
so, please give me an email shout at the above address or leave a message on
my voicemail at (650)218-3069.  I think you will be truly impressed with the
scope and progress we have been able to make with both the short run NARG
and the long run NARG in which you were interested (not to mention our power
model).  The progress is noticeable since you saw it.  Both long and short
term NARG are having quite an impact on a number of gas decisions at the
moment ranging from Venezuelan LNG, North American LNG import terminals and
term, gas basis calculations, trading support, power plant development,
gas-to-power price spreads in key markets, veracity of heat rate trades,
bank financings, storage field evaluation, and which new pipelines we can
expect to see enter and which are dogs.

I really hope we can fit it in and get our discussions moving in a mutually
productive direction again.  I think NARG can help you become even more
successful, and I look forward to working with you.

We have a new office address and new phone number as well.  (We move in May
1.)

Altos Management Partners
95 Main Street, Suite 10
Los Altos, CA  94022
(650)948-8830 voice
(650)948-8850 FAX
(650)218-3069 Cellular

Give the phones a week or so to get "debugged" and then switch over.

Dale


You are right-- Glen and Tony confirmed.  Thanks .  DF

Vernon Mercaldo
10/30/2000 08:32 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Contract Request Approval For Request: 38927 Route: 1

I do not believe so.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           10/30/2000 07:56 AM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Contract Request Approval For Request: 38927 Route: 1

I've approved, but is this a neg. rate deal that has to be filed?  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 10/30/2000
07:53 AM ---------------------------

CMS Mail
10/26/2000 02:14 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Contract Request Approval For Request: 38927 Route: 1

                                    COMMENTS

Route: 1
Craig Buehler - (Approved) CAPACITY RELEASE COMPETITION.  ROUTING DUE TO
NON-STANDARD LANGUAGE IN PARAGRAPH NO.1 OF THE AMENDMENT.  DISCOUNT IS SPLIT
INTO TWO TERMS: NOV-MAR AND APR-OCT.  THE DEMAND & MDQ CHANGE BETWEEN TERMS.
 THE LAST 2,000/D OF THE MDQ IS VOLUMETRIC DURING BOTH TERMS.  DEAL PER
VERNON
MERCALDO.

CWB

FOR THROUGHPUT                                           Market
Services
                                                         DATE:  Oct 26,
2000
                                                         CR# 107127 RQST#
38927
                        CONTRACT APPROVAL
FORM

NATURE OF CONTRACT:
TFX

PARTIES:     Northern Natural Gas
Company
             APACHE
CORPORATION

SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL
POINTS:

The contract contains Non-Standard Language.

Reason for Discount: New agreement (1 year).  Non-standard language for
the
Demand rate.  Deal per Vernon Mercaldo.

CWB

Total Discount:
$2,787,368.00
Discount Amendment
Attached

Account Manager: VERNON MERCALDO, (713)
853-7221

Approval is required of the departments marked with an asterisk
(*).
Contact the account manager for additional information.  Please send
approval
or comments to EB4135R, Phone:713-853-6182,  Fax: 713-646-8260
ASAP.

  *Marketing, Account Manager: _______________________________   DATE:
_________

  *Marketing, Regional V.P.:   _______________________________   DATE:
_________

  *Law, General Counsel:       _______________________________   DATE:
_________

  *Regulatory Affairs, V.P.:   _______________________________   DATE:
_________

  *Marketing, V.P.:            _______________________________   DATE:
_________

  *President:                  _______________________________   DATE:
_________

________________________________________________________________________

   * Required Signatures


Tanya:  Would you please prepare a credit worksheet for Chase.  Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000
06:44 PM ---------------------------

Ravi Thuraisingham@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 03/07/2000 11:28:07 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince Kaminski
cc: Jim Irvine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: FYI: Sycamore Support on Network Planning

FYI:

Note that the person mentioned in the text below (Ming Lung Lee) is very
experienced in traditional traffic engineering work. He comes from MCI where
he was responsible for modeling traffic etc.  It  appears that Sycamore
finally got him.  One time they had lost him to Corvis (another optical
equipment company), I guess Sycamore went back to him with a better deal!  As
soon as this guy is available, I'll set up an all day technical meeting to
hash out what needs to be done as far as optimization algorithm development
is concerned.  I want to produce a technical requirement document to clearly
outline what needs to be done to support dynamic, optical-switched-circuits
based trading and streaming media applications, etc.  Having such an industry
expert help us will help 'justify' internally all the the effort on the
traffic analysis side that John Griebling has asked us to support.  Keep in
mind that even though he is an expert in the field, the field that we need to
play in has not develop yet. Even the emerging data based traffic (as opposed
to voice where blocking of traffic is allowed) analysis is an order of
magnitude more difficult (due to uncertain load), let alone trading such load
(which we are planning to do!).

Ravi.

... Sycamore hired a guy per Griebling's request, to work with you on the
design/planning piece of the business.  He will be contracted out to Enron
for a period of 6 months initially.  He lives in SF but will be traveling to
whereever you need him.  Jim, Griebling wanted us to set up a meeting
between you guys for Wednesday morning, if you have time.  His name is Ming
Lung Lee and he comes to us from MCI.  Let me know what works.

----- Forwarded by Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications on 03/07/00 11:09
AM -----

	Kristin.Bethurem@sycamorenet.com
	03/07/00 09:44 AM

		 To: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kristin.Bethurem@sycamorenet.com
		 cc: Jim Irvine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
barb.vanbeyerer@sycamorenet.com, Brett.Leida@sycamorenet.com
		 Subject: RE: Pooling Point Profiles

Hi Ravi.  Fair enough, we will make sure we keep you guys in the loop.  Let
Barb/me know which items we can offload to you guys.

First thing to be done is Barb will schedule a call between us and you all
to gain a better understanding of a number we are trying to back into with
the metro solutions (there are alot of options on our side and we need some
guidelines).  I already talked to John about this this morning so we need to
make some headway on that number.  Also, we are scheduled for a conference
call Wednesday morning with Griebling to discuss where we are at with
initial solutions for metro.  Would you like to join us?

Thursday night, we have a dinner tentatively planned (talk with Griebling
about who, where, etc.).  Friday we will be meeting all day at the Omni in
Interlocken.

Ravi and Jim, per my conversations with John, he is going to run point on
the metro solutions.  Dorn is swamped with other activities.  As for the
switching piece, we discussed our routing software on Monday and I think
that is all we are going to do until Ahi is done then we will set up a
meeting between our guys and the Ahi folks.  The expectation is that this
meeting will occur in the next 30 days.

Also, Sycamore hired a guy per Griebling's request, to work with you on the
design/planning piece of the business.  He will be contracted out to Enron
for a period of 6 months initially.  He lives in SF but will be traveling to
whereever you need him.  Jim, Griebling wanted us to set up a meeting
between you guys for Wednesday morning, if you have time.  His name is Ming
Lung Lee and he comes to us from MCI.  Let me know what works.

The best ways to reach me are my cell phone or text pager.  Cell is
303-619-2485 and pager is 888-467-6167 -- you can send me a text message
from either your pager (if you have a 2 way) or press 3 to get an operator.

thanks, Kristin

-----Original Message-----
From: Ravi_Thuraisingham@enron.net [mailto:Ravi_Thuraisingham@enron.net]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 9:52 AM
To: Kristin.Bethurem@sycamorenet.com
Cc: Jim_Irvine@enron.net; barb.vanbeyerer@sycamorenet.com;
Brett.Leida@sycamorenet.com
Subject: RE: Pooling Point Profiles

Hi Kristin, Jim and I will be in Broomfield, CO from tueday late ~ 10am
until
friday end of day.  We would appriciate being in the loop of any discussion
that
you may have with John and Dorn (provided that they can be shared with us).
Both
John and Dorn are very busy and you can help alleviate some of the
congestion by
send information directly to Jim & me.

Regards,

Ravi.

|--------+-------------------------------->
|        |          Kristin.Bethurem@sycam|
|        |          orenet.com            |
|        |                                |
|        |          03/05/00 04:34 PM     |
|        |                                |
|--------+-------------------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|
  |
|
  |       To:     Jim Irvine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
|
  |       cc:     Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications,|
  |       barb.vanbeyerer@sycamorenet.com, Brett.Leida@sycamorenet.com
|
  |       Subject:     RE: Pooling Point Profiles
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-|

Jim

Thanks for the info.  We will walk through this information and I am sure we
(Brett and Barb) will have some questions as we are modeling with our
potential metro solutions.  When would you and Ravi be available for a
conference call on Tuesday to discuss?

Also, as far as a meeting, I am trying to recall what you are referencing.
Is it in regards to this or the switching piece?  Will you two be in Denver
all week?  We have a call with Griebling tomorrow regarding our routing
software, so I can talk with him about how he wants to handle this piece.

Talk to you soon, Kristin

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim_Irvine@enron.net [mailto:Jim_Irvine@enron.net]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 3:45 PM
To: Kristin.Bethurem@sycamorenet.com
Cc: Ravi_Thuraisingham@enron.net; barb.vanbeyerer@sycamorenet.com
Subject: Pooling Point Profiles

Kristin
Attached is the sanitized file promised.
What is the status on next weeks meeting and more specifically, what is the
location?

Jim
----- Forwarded by Jim Irvine/Enron Communications on 03/03/00 03:40 PM
-----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Andre Bourque|
|        |                       |
|        |          03/03/00     |
|        |          01:27 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
  |
|
  |       To:     Jim Irvine/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
|
  |       cc:
|
  |       Subject:     Pooling Point Profiles
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|

JIM:

As part of your vendor negotiation requirements.

Andre F. Bourque
Enron Broadband Services

----- Forwarded by Andre Bourque/Enron Communications on 03/03/00 01:28 PM
-----
|--------+----------------------->
|        |          Andre Bourque|
|        |                       |
|        |          03/02/00     |
|        |          05:42 PM     |
|        |                       |
|--------+----------------------->

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
  |
|
  |       To:     Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications|
  |       cc:     Rob Kolosvary/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
|
  |       Lisa Rosenberg/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Andre
|
  |       Bourque/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John
|
  |       Griebling/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Laura
|
  |       Beneville/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
|
  |       Subject:     Pooling Point Profiles
|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|

RAVI:

As per your request, the attached profiles have been sanitized of their
sources.

Regards,

Andre F. Bourque
Enron Broadband Services

(See attached file: Pooling Point Profiles.xls)


Please send cookie bouquet from Rod and I.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walker, Blake
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:48 PM
To:	Coates, Kim; Lehtinen, Kristi
Cc:	Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	FW: Baby Copeland

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walker, Blake
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:22 PM
To:	Marlow, Keith; Petry, Norma; Alencastro, David; Brannon, Biff; Camacho, Amanda; Chavez, Edward Jr.; Gehle Jr., William; Grajewski, Joseph T.; Kadakia, Tushar; Martinez, Rocio; Menefee, Bob; Pomrenke, Pat
Subject:	Baby Copeland

Erin had her baby boy!!!

Chase Allen Copeland
7.46 lbs
19.5 inches long
born at 2:30 p.m. today


Thanks so much for the message.  I am proud of myself for completing this
race.  I need to figure out how I am going to keep off the weight.  Love you
lots,
Ben


If GPM Linam Ranch wants to come on this afternoon without a nom let them come on. They owe us 17,000 for the month. I will check with you before intra day 2 nom to see if they have come on. I had told them that we would not confirm any gas at Linam until we actually see some flow.

Gary


Jay,

I can't seem to add any new products to my customer page. Mike Cowan said to
drop you a line and have you clear the pages.

Thanx,

Chris Dorland


The first quarter of 2001 was a record quarter for the performance of the businesses under the Enron Global Markets group.  We posted a gross margin number of $100 million for the first quarter.  This represents a 38% increase in gross margin after a very successful Q1 of 2000.  When combined with outstanding results posted in December of 2000, EGM has contributed over $187 million to the Wholesale group in the last 4 months.  This was due to tremendous contributions from each business group.

In order to keep the momentum going and to facilitate more growth, the following changes and additions have been made within the organization.

Crude and Products group
Mid-marketing
Bill Berkeland has joined the group and is responsible for creating a focused mid-marketing function specifically within this group.  Fred Lagrasta is responsible for mid-marketing for Enron Americas and still maintains some responsibility for various contacts and deal flow as well.  The purpose of this group is to be very focused in the development of crude and product specific products and services.  This group reports to Randy Maffett.

Origination
In order to manage the increased origination opportunities around the world, the Origination group has been changed in order to insure that the proper focus is placed on these opportunities and to manage its wide scope.  Doug Friedman will lead our NGL and Petchem origination efforts reporting to John Nowlan.  Joining Doug will be Rick Cantrell recently hired from Union Carbide.  The global crude and products origination group has added Randy O'Conner from Red Meteor, who has extensive experience in these markets.  Both Randy and Doug Leach's growing fuels origination group will report to Randy Maffett.

Trading
Lee Jackson will assume the role of U.S. NGL's lead financial trader, supported by Chad South.  The petchem and plastic trading businesses have been reorganized under Stuart Bland.  Alan Engberg will be responsible for plastics trading in the Americas.

Shipping
Scott Moncrieff will assume responsibility of our global shipping network related to crude and products.  Scott will be charged with expanding all aspects of the shipping portfolio taking advantage of our growing presence in these markets and the successes we have had marketing shipping on line.

Weather
The weather group under Mark Tawney's direction is expanding its efforts around the world.  Europe will have an expanded focus and the London office will focus on new opportunities in Europe.  Paul Murray has joined Enron from Castlebridge Partners and will be moving to London to develop and expand the continental opportunities.  Ross McIntyre, currently based in London, will report to Paul.  Bill Windle has joined the weather group and has responsibility for origination activities for North America.  Bill's most recent assignment has been in the EBS organization.  The Oslo weather office managed by Thor Lien will have responsibility for Scandinavia weather activities.  In addition, employees are being added in the Australia and Japan regions.  We are now making markets in 32 cities around the world on EnronOnline.

Coal
Mark Schroeder has joined the coal group and is responsible for origination activities with generators in the U.S.  Mark's most recent assignment was as the head of all regulatory activities for Enron Europe, Japan and Australia.

Enron Japan
The momentum of power deregulation process has slowed in Japan.  The decision has been made to scale back the wholesale power activities.   Joe Hirl, President and CEO of Enron Japan, will now report into the EGM organization.  Joe will maintain his direct responsibility of the office and will be increasing his focus on the business lines within EGM.  All of these products have high growth potential in both the near and long-term and he will coordinate and help implement with all the business lines and their activities.

LNG
LNG continues to expand with the vision to increase the number of transactions and create a portfolio of assets and contractual access around the world.  Jonathan Whitehead has joined the LNG group and has responsibility for all trading and shipping activities.

Neal Gerstandt, previously an independent energy consultant,  Jared Kaiser, from Enron Americas - East Gas Desk, and Kurt Lindahl, from Enron Global Assets, have also joined the LNG group with responsibilities in the area of origination in the Western Region.

Enron Freight Markets
EFM has concluded over 2,000 transactions in its first two months.  Chris Kravas continues to focus on building the spot trading and mid-market capabilities that will enable it to be the dominant player in its market, and has hired four new traders in the last two weeks.  Kellie Metcalf, from EBS, has joined Shawn Cumberland's origination effort, and Deirdre McCaffrey, from Gas Structuring and Mid-Market, has joined Matt Arnold's forward trading group focusing on diesel products.

Global Risk Markets
David Hoog joined Enron from Ace Insurance in December 2000 and has quickly built a team of people specialized in trading unit contingent power price call options, a hybrid insurance derivative product. Drawing on Ace and Enron resources, this team is based in New York and includes Alex Tartakovski and Larry Marcus from Ace, as well as Joana Bekerman and Tony Chang who recently moved to New York from Houston. Their first transaction closed just 3 months after startup.

Brad Blesie will be moving to London in June to establish a base of operation for GRM and expand our insurance derivative activities into the European market place. Among the opportunities he is currently exploring are contingent call options applied to shipping and charter rates, trading insolvent insurance claims, and combining North Sea oil and gas VPP risk with decommissioning insurance.

In April this year, EGM established a hedge fund origination effort in New York reporting to Per Sekse and led by Russell Dyk who recently moved to New York from LNG in Houston. Russell is responsible for expanding our commodity trading relationship with hedge funds to include crude oil, products, liquids and other commodities traded by EGM. Joining Russell in this effort is Stephen Plauche, who comes to us from Enron Americas' power trading desk.

Financial Trading
Elsa Piekielniak has assumed responsibility for Enron's developing agriculture business.  Billy Lemmons has changed groups and now runs the Analyst and Associate program for Enron Corp.

Please congratulate everyone on their new assignment and we look forward to the continued growth in all the EGM businesses.


Jeff, I've attached a copy of the letter describing
the loan of the Madeline O'Connor piece to the McNay
Museum in San Antonio this summer. Please let me or
Betty Moody at Moody Gallery know if you have any
questions. Also, have you had a chance to make a
decision about a piece for the niche between the boys'
rooms? Thanks. Leigh Edwards
--- Joannie.Williamson@enron.com wrote:
> Could you call me regarding a Madeline O'Connor
> piece.
>
> Thanks,
> Joannie
> 713-345-7774
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
 - SKIdecisions.doc


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Natural Gas Delivered on Saturday, October   27, 2001 thru Monday, October   29, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Friday, October   26, 2001)
Click here to access index history .
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Region     Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (mmBtu)	Hub Name
 LOUISIANA
    ANR SE	          $3.0700	          $2.9800	          $3.0139	-    .1067	         667,500	American Natural Resources Pipeline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool
    Columbia Onshore	          $3.0900	          $3.0050	          $3.0530	-    .0677	         438,300	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool
    Henry Hub	          $3.1100	          $3.0000	          $3.0478	-    .0936	       4,043,400	Henry Hub tailgate - Louisiana
    NGPL LA	          $3.0400	          $2.9400	          $2.9948	-    .1135	         716,100	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Louisiana Pool
    Tenn 500L	          $3.1750	          $3.0150	          $3.0430	-    .1074	         636,900	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 500 Leg Pool
    Tenn 800L	          $3.0450	          $2.9800	          $3.0225	-    .1136	         302,100	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.-Zone L, 800 Leg Pool
    TETCO ELA	          $3.0850	          $3.0100	          $3.0494	-    .1185	         710,100	Texas Eastern - East LA
    TETCO WLA	          $3.0600	          $2.9900	          $3.0244	-    .1228	         106,500	Texas Eastern - West LA
    Transco 65	          $3.1250	          $3.0600	          $3.0950	-    .0917	         286,800	Transco - Station 65
    Trunkline ELA	          $3.0500	          $2.9800	          $3.0124	-    .1426	         193,500	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool
    TxGas SL	          $3.0400	          $3.0100	          $3.0272	-    .0804	         340,200	Texas Gas Transmission Corp.-Zone SL FT Pool
 MIDCONTINENT
    MichCon, citygate	          $3.2800	          $3.1500	          $3.2180	-    .1793	         465,000	Michigan Consolidated
    NGPL Midcont	          $2.9700	          $2.8400	          $2.8770	-    .1748	         533,100	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Mid-Continent Pool
    NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $3.2000	          $3.0900	          $3.1331	-    .1582	       1,325,400	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nicor Citygate
    NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $3.1750	          $3.1000	          $3.1270	-    .2090	         160,500	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, Nipsco Citygate
    NNG Demarcation	          $3.0300	          $2.9400	          $2.9708	-    .2654	         841,500	Northern Natural Gas, Demarcation Pool
 NORTHEAST
    Columbia TCO	          $3.5150	          $3.3350	          $3.4015	-    .0745	       1,374,300	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool
    Dominion So.Point	          $3.4450	          $3.3800	          $3.4061	-    .0991	       1,158,000	Dominion - South Point
    TETCO M3	          $3.5000	          $3.4000	          $3.4278	-    .2013	         578,700	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone
    Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $3.6700	          $3.5000	          $3.5662	+    .0203	         797,700	Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)
 WEST
    El Paso non-Bondad	          $2.6400	          $2.4200	          $2.5350	-    .3942	         669,000	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool
    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $2.6600	          $2.5500	          $2.6000	-    .3133	         417,600	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.
    Opal	          $2.5400	          $2.3900	          $2.4346	-    .4758	         210,000	Opal
    PG?Citygate	          $2.8200	          $2.6600	          $2.7522	-    .4946	         351,000	PG?- Citygate
    SoCal Border	          $2.8900	          $2.7650	          $2.8306	-    .2531	         188,400	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)
 WEST TEXAS
    El Paso - Keystone	          $2.8500	          $2.6700	          $2.7158	-    .2735	         882,900	El Paso - Keystone Pool
    Waha	          $2.8900	          $2.7550	          $2.8024	-    .2190	         477,600	Waha Hub - West Texas

                                                                                Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com .
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe .
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Happy anniversary!  I hope to leave the office soon and am planning to call
you to wish you that over the phone on my way home.

Not much unpacking yet -- our main focus up until Sunday morning was getting
Amanda ready for camp.  There was still a good bit of painting going on this
week, so this weekend I do hope to get quite a bit unpacked.

We got our first letter from Amanda yesterday , and it sounds as if she is
having fun.  Said that she was homesick and missed us, but was not sad.  Has
some of the same girls in her cabin that she had last summer.

I plan to shop this weekend for your birthday gift for Amanda.  As we
discussed, she will have a continuation of her birthday when she gets back
home next weekend.  So by the end of the weekend I should be able to give a
total for gifts for both girls.

Love, Sally

SueW2@aol.com on 06/02/2000 04:03:38 PM
To: sally.beck@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Friday afternoon

Dear Sally,  Hope you are about finish up at the office and are headed home
soon.  I am eager to hear how things are going at your house.  Do you have
most everything back in place or were you too busy getting Amanda ready.

Is Amanda having a good time again this year?  I have written her several
times.

I would like very much to know what I owe you for Meagan and Amanda's
birthday presents, so If you have time this week-end perhaps you can give me
a call.  Give that Tyler a big hug for us.

Love,

Mom


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/13/2000 08:52
AM ---------------------------

"Boyd J. Springer" <Boyd_J._Springer@jonesday.com> on 06/12/2000 07:23:44 PM
To: dtucker@bracepatt.com, cdade@bracepatt.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Agency Agreement

_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

Here are my comments re Peoples' mark-up:
                                         1. Sects. 1.1, 1.11, 10.2, and
15.1(f). The combined effect of the proposed changes to these sections is
to significantly broaden the terminantion right in the event that
governmental action related to the agreement is modified in a manner
unacceptable to either party. As changed the unacceptable approval can come
at any time during the term of the agreement, and need not  involve
approval  "required" for the agreement to remain effective. Peoples did not
propose to include language from the comparable NIGAS Hub Agreement which
refers to adverse "rate approval". However, Peoples' intent may be to
obtain a termination remedy in the event of an adverse rate-making decision
re the treatment of Hub revenues. In any event, the meaning of a
termination right triggered if a government approval (not necessarily
required for the agreement to remain in effect) is modified "in any manner
which is unacceptable" is, at best, unclear. We should try to stay with the
original language (or, perhaps, limit expansion of the termination right to
circumstances when a "required" approval is revoked.) While the broadened
termination right proposed by Peoples is available to either party, I
wouldn't think it likely that MEH would wish to terminate as a result of a
modified regualtory decision not required for continuation of the agency
arrangement.
2. Sects. 1.6, 7.1. 2.2, 2.10 (comments re cumulative net revenue
definition) As modified, MEH is charged with the duty to market Hub
Serivces, which includes Extended Hub Serivces (Def'n. 1.17). However, the
proposed Adminisatrative Service Fee (7.1) is only payable during the term
of the Agreement. MEH, therefore, is required by the Agreement to market
extended Hub Services, but receives no compensation (after termination of
the Agreement) for doing so. Also, Peoples proposes to add provision (C)
eliminating refund amounts from the definition of Cumulative Net Revenue.
Apparently in conjuction with this, Peoples proposes to delete the last
sentence of 1.6 which requires a retroactive adjustment of cumulative net
revenue in the event of a refund. Peoples also has bracketed 7.3,
apparently intending to exclude it. I suppose this is fine from MEH's
perspective. The effect of these changes is to deduct only amounts actually
refunded from the revenue base for the administrative fee, and not require
a retroactive adjustment. This could benefit MEH if the agreement
terminates before a refund is required. No retroactive adjustment would be
needed.
3. Sect. 1.9, 2.5. Peoples proposes to delete the requirement that it make
nominating or scheduling changes on interstate pipelines for receipt or
delivery of gas needed for hub transactions or delivery of gas at a
secondary point for displacement delivery. Northern Illinois Gas Co. did
agree to these provision in the contract with its Hub Agent. I do not know
the value of these commitments to MEH from a business standpoint.
                         4. Sect. 1.13. Peoples proposes that the GTC be
defined to included changes made by Peoples in its sole discretion.
Peoples, however, is not free to change the GTC as it sees fit. FERC may
elect to allow changes proposed by Peoples to become effective, but Peoples
can, at most, "propose" changes in its sole discretion. How about: "the
effective general Terms and Conditions of the Operating Statament as may be
modified from time to time." Sect. 6.1 gives Peoples a right to propose
changes to the GTC, so there is no need to cover that here.
                              5. Sect. 1.17. The GTC does not indicate that
Parking and Loaning Service must be interruptible. I will review this
further.                      6. Sect. 2.2. Peoples has modified the
language giving it responsibility to ensure compliance with the GTC to
assign this obligation to both parties. The intent was to comply with
requirements of FERC orders indicating that an agent need not be
certificated as a "natural gas company", if there is another entity with
clear responponsibilty to ensure compliance with the Natural Gas Act and
FERC regulations. I suggest we stay with the origianl language indicating
that Peoples, the certificate holder, has the responsibility to ensure
compliance with regulatory requirements.
          7. Sect. 2.4b The thrid sentence is confusing in light of the
sending sentence indicating that MEH must consent to a change in
information re firm capacity. Perhaps "in its sole discretion" can be
delted and the last word of the third sentence changed to "appropriate".
                              8. Sect. 2.5. New Item 3 of the list of
grounds for refusal should be deleted. The GTC (Sect. 8.2) specifies the
grounds on which Hub Serivce can be denied. The Agency Agreement should not
add to this. Also, the GTC expressly requires that firm serivce provided
under the Operating Statement and firm serivce under peoples' Illiniois
tariffs have equal scheduling priority.
                                   9. Sect. 2.10. This Section places the
risk of non-payment on MEH, unless Peoples conducts the credit check. This
is how risk was allocated in the NIGAS Hub Agreement. That agreement,
however, provided for a 50/50 split of Hub revenue. As proposed by Peoples,
MEH would receive only an agency fee and lesser percentage of revenue. With
the changed allocation of revenue, a changed allocation of non-payment risk
also may be appropriate. Normally, the this risk should follow
responsibility for accepting the transaction. At a minimum, non-payment
risk should be assigned to Peoples if (i) it performs the credit check; or
(ii) requires MEH to accept a Hub customer which MEH has rejected based on
a credit analysis conducted under the GTC (Sect. 8.2).
     10. Sect. 3.3. The required refunds could be large relative to the
administrative fee. The revised language requires MEH to finance refunds
for ten business days. Should there be an interest component?
                                                        11. Sect. 3.4. This
Section suggests that MEH will receive a fee for Extended Hub Services. I'm
don't see how this occurs under the revised language.   12. Sect. 3.5.
Peoples proposes to delete the language requiring best efforts to minimize
imbalances. Compliance filings due this summer under FERC Order 637 are
expected to offer incentives related to avoidance of imbalances and Peoples
should attempt to use these procedures. We should discuss this with them on
Wed.
                    13. Sect. 5.1. Peoples has modified the warranties to
indicate consistency of the Agency Agreement with "material" contractcs and
Judgments or Laws not expected to have a material adverse effect. Is it
suffucuent to have minor contract violations and inconsistency with some
Laws/Judgments?               14. Sect. 7.1 The NIGAS Hub Agreement did not
have a flat fee component.
15. Sect. 10.1. Because the Governmental Approval must be acceptable to
both Peoples and MEH, People should not have "sole" authority to prepare
and file all applications.
                                         16. Sect. 10.2. See comments above
re Governmental Approval. Also, I don't think there is a need for the word
"expressly" in the first sentence.            17. Sect. 11.1. Should the
Section require consent for transfer by operation of law if we wish to have
this requirement in the event that the Hub facilities are sold?

          18. Sect. 15.1 (a). If this type of provision is going to be
included, should there at least be an initial period (say a year) to get
started which doesn't trigger a termination right? The NIGAS Agreement had
a section along these lines.
          19. Sect. 15.1 (f). See comments above re Governmental Approval.
                                                   20. Former 15.1 (f) now
deleted. This provided that the Agency Agreement could be terminated is MEH
is dissolved. This seems necessary to me.          21. 15.1 (g) Peoples
wishes to have sole discretion to change its Facilities or the GTC, but
proposes to limit MEH's termination right in the event that such a change
impairs the HUB's marketability. It seems reasonably to allow MEH to
terminate if it believes that HUB marketability is impaired, without a need
to demonstrate reasonableness.
                                         22. Sect. 17.1 I don't understand
why Peoples wishes to require confidentiality for the compensation
sections. The Illinois Commission Staff and interested parties would have
access to this information under a protective agreement. This would
unnecessarily complicate the approval process and I don't know what there
is to gain from secrecy. These provisions were part of the public record in
the NIGAS approval case.                                     That's all.
Let's discuss tomorrow.


Start Date: 4/20/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.


NEW DIALING INSTRUCTIONS

To:          All Enron Houston Users

Subject:   New Dialing Instructions

Ref:   Tie Line Access Code Changes - Enron Houston Users

Just a reminder, the access codes for remote locations were modified within the Enron Building phone system.  The modifications will affect users as follows:

1.        We have changed the first digit dialed when accessing the Tie Lines from 7 to 8.  This change will only affect Enron Building users.
2.        The second and third digits of the London, Calgary, Omaha, and Portland tie lines have also changed.  This change will affect all users.  All other digits of existing dial strings will remain the same.  For your reference, a list of the new dial strings is identified in the table below.

REVISED DIAL STRINGS FOR ENRON TIE LINE NETWORK
Users must dial 8 digits to call via Tie Lines

Enron Location	Old String	New String
Beijing	7 810 XXXX	8 810 XXXX
Buenos Aires	7 900 XXXX	8 900 XXXX
Calgary	7 403 XXXX	8 283 XXXX
Caracas	7 58 XXXXX	8 58 XXXXX
Chicago	7 220 XXXX	8 220 XXXX
Dahbol India	7 812 XXXX	8 812 XXXX
Hinsdale	7 235 XXXX	8 235 XXXX
London	7 830 XXXXX	8 44 XXXXX
Monterey	7 152 2XXX	8 152 2XXX
New York	7 212 XXXX	8 212 XXXX
New York Metals	7 211 XXXX	8 211 XXXX
Omaha	7 87 XXXX	8 287 XXXX
Portland	7 834 XXXX	8 234 XXXX
Rio De Janiero	7 920 XXXX	8 920 XXXX
Sao Paulo	7 910 XXXX	8 910 XXXX
Sydney	7 800 XXXX	8 800 XXXX
Tokyo	7 860 XXXX	8 860 XXXX
Toronto	7 285 XXXX	8 285 XXXX
Washington DC (Future)	N/A	8 245 XXXX

* X represents an extension number


FYI - The details below take care of the Hess "sharing arrangement" that we
discussed yesterday.  --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2001 10:12 AM
---------------------------

Jeffrey C Gossett
01/31/2001 07:10 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hess Annuity

FYI....
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
07:09 PM ---------------------------

Errol McLaughlin@ENRON
01/31/2001 06:52 PM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hess Annuity

Jeff,

Deal QN2026.1 (EOL 803898) was booked on 01/24/2001 -  Enron Buys 15000/d
Feb. 01 at 6.90.  Deal QN2004.1 is a duplicate of this deal.  Deal QN5772.1
was booked on 01/25/2001 - Enron Sells 15000/d Feb. 01 at 7.115.  The booking
of QN5772.1 generated positive revenue of $90,300.  Annuity deal QN2026
paying Hess $45,143 was booked tonight.

Thanks,

Errol


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

Thank you for your order.

You sold 213 shares of CIEN (Ciena Corp Com) at 80.250000.

ORDER DETAILS:
The tracking number for this order is: B-300-AAZM-2558
Order entered at:                      11:20:15 on 12/01/00
Order processing began at:             11:20:21
Order executed at:                     11:20:21 on 12/01/00

ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Time and Date: 11:20:21 on 12/01/00
Your position in CIEN is 37 shares
Your real cash total is $-1,205.92

You will receive a printed Datek Online confirmation by postal mail, or by
electronic delivery if you are subscribed to that service.

Questions regarding this transaction? Contact our Customer Support department
by e-mailing support@datek.com. Please reference the order tracking number.


This request has been pending your approval for  7 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000076650&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000076650
Request Create Date : 11/19/01 2:40:19 PM
Requested For       : punit.rawal@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Power
Resource Type       : Applications


---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Loveless/ET&S/Enron on 02/07/2000
09:23 AM ---------------------------

Kenneth Young
02/04/2000 04:06 PM

To: Rick Loveless/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: NSPS Calculation for Saturn 1200 -Reply

Rick,
Attached is communications I have had with Solar on the Saturn turbine fuel
consumption.  The fuel rate Ms Leslie Whitherspoon cites in her example below
is the lowest I have seen from Solar for a Saturn turbine.  I do not know for
a fact whether her example is applicable to our operation.

I am making you aware that any of the calculations using Solar's data has
exceeded the 10.7 gigajoule/hr limit as specified in 40 CFR 60.330 clause of
the BNA's Subpart GG - Standards of Performance for Stationary Gas Turbines.

I was incorrect to say exceeding this fuel consumption would trigger PSD; per
our conversation it only triggers a NSPS permit which occordingly is
triggered anyway with the replacement of a Saturn turbine.  Attached is the
spreadsheet I forwarded to Ms Whitherspoon.

Ken Young

---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth Young/ET&S/Enron on 02/04/2000
03:45 PM ---------------------------

Leslie H Witherspoon <Witherspoon_Leslie_H@solarturbines.com> on 02/01/2000
09:49:00 AM
To: Kenneth Young/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: NSPS Calculation for Saturn 1200 -Reply

In the NSPS formula the "STD" value is % by volume....

Therefore, you take your result, 0.015 % ppmv, and move the
decimal two places to the left to represent ppmv.  Result 0.00015
or 150 ppm.

Yes, the Saturn has a heat input high enough to trigger the NSPS
regulation.  This regulation however, has nothing to do with
triggering PSD.  I don't understand the connection you are
making between NSPS, Subpart GG and PSD.  Most states,
including Kansas, have the delegated authority for NSPS.

All that is required by the standard is a performance test within
180 days of start-up and a record of the sulfur and nitrogen
content of the fuel.  In some cases, less testing is required.

Please let me know if this doesn't answer your questions.  I feel
that there may be some disconnect on what your strategy and
how I'm assisting.

Leslie
619.544.2434

On Wednesday, I can be reached at 619.590.0552 all day.

>>> Kenneth_Young@enron.com 02/01/00 04:21pm >>>

Leslie,
Please review your calculations.  I do not think  (14.4  /  14.4  x
0.015)
equals 150ppm.

This issue is not the tolerable limits of emission of the Solar
Saturn.  I feel
this issue relates to a fuel flow limit which governs whether a
Saturn falls
under the 10.7 gigajoule limit prescibe by 40 CFR 60.330 clause
of the BNA's
Subpart GG - Standards of Performance for Stationary Gas
Turbines.  I have
included a spreadsheet to illustrate my point.  From your data a
Solar Saturn
consumes fuel at the rate of 10,864 BTU/HP.hr; my calculations
show that this
rate consumes fuel a rate about .5 gigajoule above BNAs limit,
which may force
us to apply for a PSD permit.

Please take time to review the spreadsheet and my comments,
and if you see
anything that needs correction, please advise.

(See attached file: Solar Saturn limits.xls)

Thanks
Ken Young

Leslie H Witherspoon
<Witherspoon_Leslie_H@solarturbines.com> on 01/26/2000
02:28:00 AM

To:   Kenneth Young/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:   Leslie H Witherspoon
<Witherspoon_Leslie_H@solarturbines.com> (IPM Return
      requested) (Receipt notification requested)

Subject:  NSPS Calculation for Saturn 1200

Heat Rate at ISO conditions:  10,864 Btu/Hp-hr

10,864 Btu/Hp-hr  x  1055 J/Btu  /  745.7 w/Hp  /  1000 J/KJ =
15.37 KJ/w-hr

Max denominator is 14.4 per the regulation

14.4  /  14.4  x  0.015   =  150  ppm

The regulatory limit is 150 ppm.  We warranty the Saturn 1500 at
110 ppm.  I would suppose that the 1200 had a similar warranty.

Please let me know if you need anything else.

Leslie Witherspoon
Solar Turbines
619.544.2434


Attached File:

"Socrates Sculpture"    2000
Cor-ten Steel and Stainless Steel Bolts
267" L x 342" W x 76" H

--
DeWitt Godfrey, Assistant Professor
Department of Fine Arts
Amherst College
19 Fayerweather Hall
Amherst, MA 01002-5000
Tel  413 542 2162
Fax  413 542 7917
Email  dagodfrey@amherst.edu

 - dagodfrey.vcf


Dave Forster and I were talking last week concerning the broker agreements
and Dave had a good suggestion.  If we included language in the commercial
agreement that makes the broker aknowledge that by clicking on the GTC they
are agreeing that the contract is similar to the terms and conditions we
contemplate with the counterparty and that the damages indicated in the GTC
would prevail in the event of a broken trade.  This will allow us to use the
current GTC click structure, the GTC liquidated damages and any other terms
in the GTC we wanted to retain yet not bind them under the other terms of the
GTC.


Wonder how much worse it would have been if we had started with a doc that
you and I liked.

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 03/25/2001 05:20:37 PM
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: A revision to your revision

whoopee!

-----Original Message-----
From: DeBerry, Jeremiah A. [mailto:JeremiahDeberry@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 5:24 PM
To: 'Keffer, John'
Subject: RE: A revision to your revision

Your change is fine.  Please send a clean and blackline of the final.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Keffer, John [mailto:JKeffer@KSLAW.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 6:14 PM
To: Jeremiah A. DeBerry (E-mail)
Cc: C. Kay Mann (E-mail)
Subject: A revision to your revision

Let me know if this is acceptable

 <<Redlined Exclusivity Agreement_.doc>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 03/25/01 18:23:58
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of conventional
first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are two examples:
janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.  If you have any
questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers."

============================================================================
==

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


Our attys are at Lebouef, Lamb in New York. I cannot get them by e-mail or phone.. We probably need to postpone.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	sheryl_gussett@reliantenergy.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-sheryl+5Fgussett+40reliantenergy+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:53 AM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Cc:	cecklund@llgm.com; hkelly@reliant.com; hughricekelly@reliantenergy.com; jay.wilson@mirant.com; jklauberg@llgm.com; Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; rmichelson@mdbe.com; sgussett@reliant.com; thoulihan@mdbe.com; wbates@mdbe.com; zack.starbird@mirant.com
Subject:	RE: E-MAIL FROM THOMAS E LAURIA re: conference call

I think the time for the call is actually 9:30 central, not eastern.  I
just tried to dial in, etc.  Talk with everyone at 9:30 central.
Sheryl

                    "Sanders, Richard
                    B."                        To:     "\"Raquel Camps\"
                    <Richard.B.Sanders@        <RCamps@miami.whitecase.com>
                    enron.com>                 @ENRON",
                                               <rmichelson@mdbe.com>,
                    09/11/01 05:37 AM          <thoulihan@mdbe.com>,
                                               <wbates@mdbe.com>,
                                               <jay.wilson@mirant.com>,
                                               <zack.starbird@mirant.com>,
                                               <hkelly@reliant.com>,
                                               <sgussett@reliant.com>
                                               cc:
                                               <hughricekelly@reliantenergy.
                                               com>, "Mellencamp, Lisa"
                                               <Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com>,
                                               <jklauberg@llgm.com>,
                                               <cecklund@llgm.com>,
                                               "Tribolet, Michael"
                                               <Michael.Tribolet@enron.com>
                                               Subject:     RE: E-MAIL FROM
                                               THOMAS E LAURIA re:
                                               conference call

This time is good for Enron. We will talk to you then.
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         "Raquel Camps" <RCamps@miami.whitecase.com>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Raquel+20Camps+22+20+3CRCamps+40miami+2Ewhitecas
> e+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:         Monday, September 10, 2001 6:01 PM
> To:           Sanders, Richard B.; rmichelson@mdbe.com;
thoulihan@mdbe.com;
> wbates@mdbe.com; jay.wilson@mirant.com; zack.starbird@mirant.com;
> hkelly@reliant.com; sgussett@reliant.com
> Cc:           hughricekelly@reliantenergy.com
> Subject:           E-MAIL FROM THOMAS E LAURIA re: conference call
>
> Pursuant to Tom Lauria's instructions a conference call has been set
> for September 11th at 9:30 a.m. (EST).  The following is the dial-in
> information:
>
> Dial-in Number:  1-800-600-2869
> Participant Number:  741064
>
> Thanks.
>
>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


good info. i don't believe there will be many more "ei" type asset
acquisitions any time soon. rick


Thersa,
Can you send me your revisions with the discounted price and commodity
charges applied to the planned storage injections today or tomorrow?  I
really need that ASAP to see if our numbers are getting any closer.
I believe that the fuel calculations are being taken into account for the
planned storage injections for the whole path from CIG through WIC and into
Young Storage.  I was planning on calling you after I saw your revisions.

Thanks...Robert


Please review the attached outage report that pertains to your region.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.

Jerry Graves
713-345-8923 (Office)
713-646-2584 (Fax)


I certainly agree on the tip of the iceberg point.  They do need to be
watched and watched carefully.  An isolated incident is one thing, a
pattern of losses is quite another.
My experience with Campbell has been limited to watching him
operate in committee, and I have not been impressed.  I would be happy to
be surprised in the future.   MIKE

At 07:09 PM 7/24/2001 -0500, you wrote:

>Interesting points.  However, I don't ever recall you agreeing with every
>Commission decision on disallowances.  And I know you wouldn't establish
>differing standards for IOUs and state water agencies.
>
>I just hope that this isn't the tip of the iceberg.
>
>You really think that Campbell is a dim bulb?  A Republican, yes, but I
>haven't heard anyone else describe him as a dim bulb.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>
>
>
>                     Mike
> Florio
>                     <mflorio@turn        To:     Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
>
>                     .org>                cc:
>
>                                          Subject:     Re: Figures show
> state lost big on
>                     07/24/2001           extra
> power
>                     05:40
> PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Shame on you, Jeff!  I expect this sort of thing from inexperienced
>reporters and dim bulbs like Campbell.  But you KNOW that this sort of
>thing is no big deal.  And when did the PUC ever disallow these kinds of
>losses for the utilities?  I don't think my memory has gotten that bad.
>MIKE
>
>
>
>At 03:20 PM 7/24/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >FYI.  Many similar stories in the major papers today.
> >
> >Best,
> >
> >
> >Jeff
> >
> >
> >Figures show state lost big on extra power
> >
> >
> >Posted at 9:53 p.m. PDT Monday, July 23, 2001
> >
> >
> >BY JOHN WOOLFOLK
> >
> >
> >Mercury News
> >
> >
> >State figures show California may have lost about $14 million this month
> >selling surplus electricity for less than it cost.
> >
> >
> >The Mercury News disclosed last week that some power was being sold at a
> >loss. But the new figures provide the first indication of just how much
> >excess power the state bought in its desperate effort to avoid blackouts
>--
> >and how cheaply some of that power was sold when it turned out not to be
> >needed.
> >
> >
> >A Republican lawmaker said Monday the loss also shows Democratic Gov. Gray
> >Davis' energy policies are needlessly costing consumers.
> >
> >
> >``This whole thing is a mess,'' said Assemblyman John Campbell, R-Irvine,
> >who requested details of the state's surplus power sales. ``The government
> >needs to get out of the power business before it costs Californians even
> >more money.''
> >
> >
> >A state spokesman didn't dispute the $14 million figure outright but said
> >it is an approximation based on average prices and that the actual loss
> >probably is less.
> >
> >
> >``It's a number I'm sure he likes very much, but it's definitely an
> >estimated number, and it could be far lower,'' said Oscar Hidalgo,
> >spokesman for the state Department of Water Resources.
> >
> >
> >Campbell responded that the loss also could be higher.
> >
> >
> >The state has spent $415 million on power so far this month.
> >
> >
> >State officials last week confirmed that cool weather and consumer
> >conservation have left California holding more power than it needs. The
> >revelation was a stunning turnaround for a state that months ago was
>paying
> >top dollar for power, expecting shortages this summer.
> >
> >
> >Price that was paid
> >
> >
> >The state bought 3.5 million megawatt-hours of electricity for July at an
> >average price of $118 per megawatt-hour, according to a response Friday by
> >the Department of Water Resources to Campbell's inquiry. The state has
>sold
> >178,000 surplus megawatt-hours in July at an average price of $37, the
> >department said.
> >
> >
> >Based on those average prices, the state paid $21 million for the surplus
> >power, which it sold for $6.5 million -- $14.5 million less than it cost.
> >
> >
> >A more precise calculation of the state's loss is difficult because
> >purchased power is acquired at different times and prices and pooled as a
> >``portfolio.''
> >
> >
> >Purchases included long-term contracts that averaged $138 per
>megawatt-hour
> >as well as cheaper spot-market buys.
> >
> >
> >State officials last week said they were selling surplus at $15 to $30 a
> >megawatt-hour, while some traders cited unconfirmed sales as low as $1.
> >
> >
> >Hidalgo noted that the surplus sales represent just 5 percent of
> >California's July purchases, which totaled $415 million. The $6.5 million
> >from sales will help lower the state's power bill, he said, adding that
> >utilities routinely sell some extra electricity.
> >
> >
> >``Despite the fact that we're in somewhat of a surplus, any power-buying
> >operation in the world is going to have to plan for these types of
> >situations,'' Hidalgo said. ``It's not unique, and in fact it's normal
> >operating procedure for any utility.''
> >
> >
> >Other Western utilities, including Portland General Electric in Oregon,
> >have said they, too, are selling some surplus power at a loss and describe
> >it as a cost of doing business.
> >
> >
> >The suppliers buying the state's surplus electricity on the cheap include
> >the big out-of-state energy companies that the governor has called
> >price-gouging ``snakes.'' Among them are Duke Energy, Dynegy Power and
> >Marketing, El Paso Power Services, Mirant, Reliant Energy and Williams
> >Energy.
> >
> >
> >`Best bid' taken
> >
> >
> >Hidalgo said the state took the best offers it could find.
> >
> >
> >``It's only reasonable to get the best bid you can,'' he said.
> >
> >
> >Campbell said the $14 million loss is troubling because ratepayers or
> >taxpayers will have to cover the cost, whereas a private utility could be
> >forced to eat the expense if regulators determined it was unreasonable.
> >
> >
> >State officials say what's more important is that the overall cost of
>power
> >is dropping, from an average daily tab of $64 million in May to $25
>million
> >this month, in part because the state has so much power.
> >
> >
> >Contact John Woolfolk at jwoolfolk@sjmercury.com <
> >mailto:jwoolfolk@sjmercury.com> or (408) 278-3410.


Jim - The option number was previously understated - should have been $252,010, for a total avg. comp. package of $384,000 in 2000.  Separately, I will forward document you may send externally.


Michael Albers, Head of unit for Energy in DG Competition gave a talk on
competition priorities in Brussels yesterday.

Highlights:

Priorities for DG Comp are:  1) foster supply competition; for examlpe, new
candidate for DG Comp's help has been identified in Belgium and it would be
necesary to intervene to help this new competitor. In merger control,
emphasis will be on supply solutions and not transmission market issues. 2)
Crossborder Network Access: proceedings will be initiated after the summer
re. French/Spanish and Dutch/Belgian borders. General policy will be spelt
out in an Art. 19(3) notice on Viking Cable. [If we want to influence general
policy we should make a submission on this before it appears: an Art 19(3)
notice is a Commission Decision and constitutes a binding legal precedent.
Although comments on Viking Cable can be made after the event, we would not
be in a position to influence the policy published in the Notice. BD to
follow up.] 3) Eligible customers should be able to choose their suppliers:
most cases are resolved informally. 4) State Aid especially stranded costs;
also environmental policy notice will have impact in this area (Nailia:please
follow up.)

Specific cases:

On UK Gas Interconnector: no news.

Long term Agreements (gas and electricity): "dominant firms cannot have
exclusivity caluses, and long-term contracts as such may be a problem".

SNAM/GAZPROM contracts: destination clauses are illegal, Commission to
initiate proceedings after the Summer break; there will be no blue lining,
meaning that in a contract where a clause is illegal, the Commission will
press for the contract to be terminated, and not allow the contract to
continue intact but the offending article 'blue lined' out. [This suggests we
ought to offer some thoughts on draft model long term contracts.BD to follow
up.]  Applicable mutatis mutandisto GFU contracts.

A gas case that will specify the limits of gas TPA regimes will be "heard
more of after the summer break". (Access to Pipelines Case, TPA ex.-Emden, is
my guess.)

Gas Release Programmes: no indication that this was an emerging issue: Albers
offered no views.

Art 86(3) Directive -- cannot achieve what one can with an Art 95 Directive
(I will write a separate explanation of this -- basically an Art 86(3)
Directive cannot force regulatory structures on countries, i.e. a regulator,
but can change a company's behaviour, i.e. account unbundling.)

Any views welcome

Brendan


Sounds good.


I'm giving up being nice.  And answering stupid questions.  You should give
up having yogurt and gatorade for lunch.  Did you have something good today?

Becky Pitre
02/28/2001 01:11 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Give up

What are you giving up for lent?
What should I give up for lent?
B


FYI.  Just to let you know, Shelley is trying to minimize emails she gets to preserve space on her
        Blackberry.  But wanted to keep you in the loop in case you needed to send her something.  Thanks. Lynn
-----Original Message-----
From: McFarland, Jean
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 11:20 AM
To: Scott, Donna; Blair, Lynn; Nacey, Sheila; Bryant, Mike; January, Steve; Dietz, Rick; Holmes, Bradley; Winters, Ricki; Hotte, Steve
Cc: Corman, Shelley
Subject: Shelley Corman - Out of the office email address

Shelley requested that I send an email asking that you send all email correspondence to her Compuserve email account while she is out of the office for the next couple of weeks.  Accessing her Compuserve account is much easier and faster than accessing mail.enron.com.

The address is:
cormanerb@cs.com <mailto:cormanerb@cs.com>

Please forward on to your team as you see fit.  If you have any questions please call me on my cell phone at 713-859-6238.

Thanks,
Jean


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Killen, Faith
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 8:21 PM
To:	Storey, Geoff
Cc:	Kitchen, Louise; Colwell, Wes; Perlman, Beth
Subject:	2002 IT Systems Development Allocations
Importance:	High

Geoff,
Please review the attached listing and advise if you agree to the projects and amounts listed as billings that Enron North America will receive in 2002 for support of these efforts. I'm at x30352 if you have any questions. Thanks!


David, Please review...give me a shout when you have had a chance to review.
- Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Curry/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 02:40 PM
---------------------------

Michael Payne@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/10/2001 02:18 PM
To: Mike Curry@ECT, Edith Cross@ECT
cc: Bob Gates@ENRON, Michael Miller@enron, John Lamb@ENRON
Subject: IM2 PPA

Mike,

By now Dave Delainey's office should have received by fax signed copies of
the PPA and GPSA.  I am attaching a redline version of both documents for
your review as well.

I am also attaching a copy of the most recent Garrad Hassan letter describing
their view on the project at this time.

Concerning your question about the timing of the energy production, as we
discussed  the GH analysis is focused on the factors which decrease the
energy production of the project.  They have not questioned the accuracy of
our hourly data collection, or when the wind blows.  As you can imagine,
determining when the wind is blowing is the science and definable part of
this work.  The art and interpretation lies in forecasting the factors which
decrease the energy.  As a result, there have been no changes in the on-peak
off-peak ratio.  In other words, the production curve should be identical
other than the downward shift.  Please don't hesitate to call me if you would
like to discuss this further.

I will be in CA and reachable at 661-823-6855, or by cell until 11:00AM PST
Thursday, returning to the Houston office Friday morning.  Please also feel
free to contact Bob Gates at 661-823-6730 should I be unavailable.

Thank you,
Michael


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 07:58 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/05/2000 05:23 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
"'msmith1@enron.com'" <msmith1@enron.com>, "'MBD'" <MDay@GMSSR.com>,
"'David_Aamodt@pcn.com'" <David_Aamodt@pcn.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft Letter re CPUC Subpoenas

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Harvey Morris Esq.
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Public Utilities Commission
San Francisco, California   94102

  Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power
Marketing, Inc. ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Inc. ("EESI"), Enron Energy
Marketing Corporation ("EEMC"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. (EESO)
and Portland General Electric Corporation ("Portland General")(collectively
sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")

Harvey,

 Here are our proposals with respect to the Enron Entities'
production of documents pursuant to the above described subpoenas issued by
the California Public Utility Commission (hereinafter "the Commission").  We
make these proposals pursuant to our email exchange of October 3, 2000 with
the understanding that the Commission agrees that by cooperating, offering
to produce or producing documents, these entities have not waived any
objections or challenges to these subpoenas whatsoever and that any claims,
defenses, objections, jurisdictional or otherwise or other responses have
been specifically reserved and can be raised in the future, if necessary.
For all of these proposals, we exclude documents that are protected from
disclosure by the attorney client and attorney work product privileges.

GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 1 through 4

 The Enron Entities have been very dynamic organizations having
acquired, sold, divested, joint ventured, spun off and otherwise reorganized
themselves extensively during the past two years.  The burden and expense on
Enron to locate, and produce every corporate organizational chart anywhere
in its organization since April 1, 1998 is significant.   The Enron entities
will provide the Commission with exemplars of its current organizational
charts, telephone directories and so called "family trees" to show its
current organization.  To the extent that Enron can readily identify and
locate exemplars of significant organizational charts, telephone directories
or so called "family trees" for earlier periods it will also make those
available.  One Enron Entity, Portland General, has published books on its
corporate history.  If a list of those books would be helpful, we can
provide it.  With respect to the other entities, to the extent that
corporate histories can be found, they will be produced.  We anticipate
producing these documents in the first wave on October 13, 2000.

Requests 5 and 6

 The Enron Entities propose that their responses to Requests 1-4 will
identify their relationship to affiliated companies and the Transaction Data
will identify its customers and suppliers.

FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS
Requests 7 through 11

 The Enron Entities will produce its public filings for the period
requested with respect to financial data.  EPMI, ESSI, and Portland General
will provide to the Commission electronic transaction data for the purchase
and sale of energy delivered which includes economic data.   We anticipate
producing public filings regarding financial data on October 13, 2000 and
the transaction data in the second wave of document productions.

GENERATING DOCUMENTS
Requests 12, 14 and 18

 For the Enron Entities other than Portland General, the generation
facilities are very small and there will probably be limited documents
available.  The Enron Entities to the extent they act as a scheduling
coordinator or possessed the right to use or resell generation output, do
not have the specific documents that pertain to each generation unit
requested.  The Enron Entities, other than Portland General, do have
documents and information for Enron Wind, Saguaro and Las Vegas
Cogeneration.  We propose to produce these documents in the second wave of
document productions.
 For Portland General, there will be a very large volume of documents
and we propose to handle them differently.  First, Portland General will
provide for year 2000 electronic data in summary form similar to the data
being provided by other Enron Entities to the extent relevant.  With respect
to specific generating cost data, because of the volume, we suggest that
these documents be made available in Portland for inspection from a
representative sampling of facilities.  If there are specific documents that
the Commission would like copied from that production, we can discuss the
arrangements for producing these documents.  We propose to make these
documents available in Portland in a third wave of document productions

TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS
Request 13, 15, 16, 17, 19

 We understand that the CPUC will be obtaining trading data for the
purchase and sale of energy delivered in California from the ISO and PX.
EPMI can provide the Commission several different sets of trading data for
year 2000 (in California and outside of California and Real Time) for the
purchase and sale of energy delivered with the date, counterparty, quantity,
delivery point, hours, price, and whether it is purchase or sale.   Because
of the speed with which you want this information, it is possible that some
entries will be incomplete or inaccurate.  For those transactions where EPMI
served only as the scheduling coordinator, we understand that the ISO will
show part of the transaction, but there will not be a corresponding
transaction in the EPMI data we can provide quickly.  The reason is that
this type of transaction is passed through to EPMI's customer on an
accounting system rather than as part of the trading business.  EESI can
also provide similar electronic data with the proviso that it will not
include the specific names of its retail customers but instead will provide
a blind customer number.  Many of ESSI's customers have agreements whereby
they must be notified of any subpoena and provided an opportunity to object.
ESSI cannot meet your time frame to release information and give its
customers the notice they require.  We anticipate producing the transaction
data in the second wave of document productions.

FERC DOCUMENTS

Request 20

 The Enron Entities will produce the requests for data they received
from FERC and to the extent that FERC has been given responses, copies of
those responses.  We anticipate producing the FERC documents on October 13,
2000.

 Based upon discussions that we have had with the various Enron
Entities, we believe that we could make a second wave of productions on
Friday October 27, 2000.  It is possible that not all Enron Entities could
make that date but we believe the bulk of the data could be available for
production by then.

 We propose to make these productions with the understanding that if
any entity obtains a more stringent protective order than the one currently
in place, that all of the Enron Entities document productions will be
protected by the most stringent protective order.

 We understand that you will consider these proposals and let us know
if they are acceptable to the Commission.  If you have any questions or
comments about our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact Michael Day
or myself.

Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP

Gary Fergus

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 10:34 AM -----

	"CAVALIER,D. MD" <LAB-DSC@womans.com>
	03/26/2001 10:17 AM

		 To: "'Sara Shackleton'" <sara.shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Mad Cow Disease

Sass,

I know you hate this sort of thing, but this is just too funny to pass up
and I didn't want to leave you out in the cold.

Have you heard from Anita?  She emailed me about whether or not I was going
to be at the wedding.

Deb

> -----Original Message-----
> From: OGDEN,B.W. MD
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 9:16 AM
> To: CAVALIER,D. MD; POLK,PEGGY MD
> Subject: FW: Mad Cow Disease
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred&Connye Lumpkin [SMTP:clobdl@datasync.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 2:29 PM
> To: CandaceLChapman@msn.com; Cy Barnhill; John&Jenny Galpin; Matthew
> McCune; OGDEN,B.W. MD; Lisa Perillo; Stan & June Polivick
> Subject: Fw: Mad Cow Disease
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lumpkin, Doug" <doug.lumpkin@inteq.com>
> To: "Lumpkin, Barry" <clobdl@datasync.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:36 AM
> Subject: FW: Mad Cow Disease
>
>
> > > ----------
> > > From: Smith, James A (LMSO)[SMTP:James.Auburn.Smith@ssc.nasa.gov]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:01 AM
> > > To: 'Doug Lumpkin'
> > > Subject: FW: Mad Cow Disease
> > >
> > >  <<MADCOW_ (1)__.doc>>
> > >
> > >
> >  <<MADCOW_ (1)__.doc>>

 - MADCOW_ (1)__.doc


Shawn,

Sorry to see you go. Let's stay in touch.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cumberland, Shawn
Sent:	Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:12 AM
To:	Haug, David; Stabler, Frank; Bergsieker, Rick; Mahan, Mariella; Castagnola, Daniel; Shields, David; Sommers, Jeffrey E.; Koye, Ken; Miller, Michael L.; Curran, Greg; Lewis, James C.; Redmond, Brian; Gutierrez, Hector; Pantin, Ronald; Bonnard, Janie; Sayre, Frank; Russ, Mark; Makk, Andrew; Vegas, Dennis; Smida, Ed; Hensel, Marc; Verma, Sandy; Vicens, Emilio; Arnell, Doug; Oehrle, Mike; Simpson, William; Cockrell-Freeman, Chris; Garcia, Maria E.; Uhl, Jessica; Crady, Ned E.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Sierra, Rick; Alkhayat, Alhamd; Adler, Jon; Hernandez, David; Hernandez, Alex; Blanco, Ernesto; Melinchon, Ermes; Richardson, James; Blanco, Pedro; McCann, Steven K.; MacKay, Stephen; Avery, Janice; Perez-Bello, Jose; Caranti, Guido; Tortolero, Elio; Marrero, Javier; Watkins, Sherron; Rivera, Coralina; Mendoza, Miguel; Puig, Orlando; Tran, Agatha; Darensbourg, Joe; Rees, Martin; Galan, Joseph M.; Boe, Larry A. (Lawrence); Brown, Angela Y.; Ernest, Angela; Weekley, Alice; Newhouse, Marie; Rodriguez, Elaine; Castillo, Richard; Chavarria, Javier; Emrich, Chuck; Hunt, Christopher B.; Martinez, Mary; Webber, Les; Wapner, Beth; Zatarain, Brian; Kaminski, Vince J; Walls Jr., Rob; Buy, Rick; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Dietrich, Janet; Olson, Cindy; Kean, Steven J.; Metts, Mark; McCarty, Danny; Hughes, James A.; Fitzgerald, Jay; Kishkill, Joe; Dimichele, Rich; Sutter, Craig; Odland, Gary; Conner, Patrick; Stanley, Brian; Leach, Doug; Gonzales, Eric; Hicks, Michelle; Shapiro, Richard; Wasaff, George
Cc:	Jackson, Shimira; Shawnfwd (E-mail); Shawn8888 (E-mail)
Subject:	farewell and thanks

Friends:

Tomorrow will be my last day at Enron.  However, I will be near, as I will be taking a new position at El Paso in a few weeks.

I've enjoyed getting to know and work with you during my stay here.

I wish you all the greatest success.

Shawn

P.S.  Prior to getting new contact information, I can be reached at shawnfwd@hotmail.com or on my cell (713.851.9578).


Shane:

Sorry, I have been on vacation.  I just returned today.

Could you please send me a copy of your resume by email?

I have tentatively scheduled the following interviews:

8:30 AM  Vince Kaminski
9:00 AM  P. V. Krishnarao
9:30 AM  Stinson Gibner
10:00 AM Tanya Tamarchenko
10:30 AM Paulo Issler
11:00 AM Zimin Lu
11:30 AM Human Resources

You should be free to return to Baton Rouge by 1:00 PM.

If this schedule is not ok, please let me know.

Thanks!

Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw
Adminitrative Coordinator
Enron Corp. Research
713/853-5290
email:  Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com

"Shane Green" <shanecgreen@earthlink.net> on 07/06/2000 10:05:13 AM
To: <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Internship

Ms. Crenshaw,
?
I just wanted to touch base and see if you had any information  concerning my
visit to Enron on Monday.?I will be in my office at LSU for  the rest of?the
day with a couple exceptions.? I teach corporate  finance from 2:30-3:30,?and
will?go to lunch at around 1.? You  can contact me here at (225) 388-6335.?
If this is not convenient, you can  send me an e-mail, or leave a message on
my home phone at (225) 744-3201, and I  can get in?touch with you tomorrow.
?
Thanks,
Shane Green


Sharon,

I just saw you call.  John Arnold is on my phone so I couldn't pick up.  How
does Thursday sound for a meeting.  I am available all day until 2:30.
Friday is also good for me.

Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin


Shirley,

Do you have a logo we can use? Plz, fwd it to her.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000
11:16 AM ---------------------------

Barbara Ostdiek <ostdiek@rice.edu> on 07/10/2000 11:04:22 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: seminar mugs

Vince:

Our PR staff has put together a great design for the Finance Seminar
mugs.  We need to get a clean copy of the Enron logo, if possible.  The
design is in Adobe Pagemaker if your people can find a logo that can be
pulled into that format.  They can send it directly to me and I will make
sure it gets to the right place.

Thanks so much.

bbo


Did you forward copies of the agreement to them, or do I need to do that?
Thank You!


<TITLE>Accept Credit Carts today!</TITLE>

<bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">

Start Accepting Credit Cards Today!

 Your business MUST be accepting Credit Cards from your customers!

   Over 97% of all sales on the Internet are done with Credit Cards.

   Over 92% of mail orders and telephone-orders are done with Credit Cards.

 If you don't take Credit Cards, 9 out of every 10 potential customers can't do business with you!

 We specialize in on-line businesses, mail order and telephone order businesses, start-ups, in-home businesses as well as retail locations.

 * In other words, we specialize in YOUR business *

        Simply
        fill out this short application and

        a representative will contact you shortly.

	Name:

	Phone Number:

	Best time to call:

To be removed from this mailing please respond with the word "remove" and you will be :)

jfugzjavhbrtcsyl


Mary:  Please let me know what happens.  All calculations should be made as
of a specific date.  Sara

	Mary Cook
	08/02/2000 01:12 PM

		 To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: ParPak

See the attached proposed letter for ParPak.  I need the rest of the
calculations, the Value of the Posted Credit Support as of the Valuation Date
and the difference.  Do you normally have the trader review this type of
letter prior to sending?  I think we should in this instance.  I expect
ParPak to reply with a request for a Return Amount.  As this occurs, please
let me draft that letter as well.  Thank you.
I will finalize the letter for you when I get the calculations.  Any
questions, please call.  Mary


Harry and Dave, I have attached a letter for you as a response to the TSS
opportunity we discussed last week. Please view this letter as an
opportunity to have further discussions.
(See attached file: Letter for TSS.doc)

Thanks
Phil Greedy
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.
 - Letter for TSS.doc


Brad, is there a time this week when you can do a conf. call to cover these
questions?

Please advise.

Regards,

Rob

Bradley.Barta@swec.com on 02/14/2001 09:43:16 AM
To: Rob.G.Gay@enron.com
cc: susan.garven@stoneweb.com, frank.kluesener@kfw.de, Bboeh@opic.gov

Subject: Questions re: Siemens Negotiations

Rob - We've reviewed your memo which sets forth general points of your
negotiations with Siemens.  Following are comments and questions regarding
certain negotiated points:

EOT Claim Agreement

Owner must operate and maintain per O&M manuals and industry practices on oil;
if not, owner must correct items materially affecting Contractor's
commissioning
obligations

We observe that while this point places reasonable responsibility on the Owner
to correct problems that were a result of their commercial operations, it is
introduces an opportunity for the Contractor to place unfounded blame on the
owner for affecting the Contractor's ability to commission.

Risk of Loss remains with owner during commissioning on gas

We understand that the Facility is under the care, custody and control of the
Owner and that the Facility is currently operating under the insurance
coverage
intended for the commercial operating period (versus the construction period).
Please confirm that there is no reason to be concerned about insurance
coverage
if a problem arises resulting in material damage attributable to Contractor
action during commissioning on gas.  We are also advising the Lenders to have
this point reviewed by an insurance advisor.

Degradation - agree to use curves with credit to owner for degradation during
commissioning

During our last conference call it was indicated that the first choice was to
test to determine degradation and the alternative was to agree on a set of
curves.  It appears that Siemens was unwilling to agree to the test approach.
We observe that the curves used to determine owner credit may be biased to the
benefit of Siemens.  We trust that your operations experts will diligently
review the basis for the curves.

Performance LD's on gas per the EPC contract with first $4,000,000 forgiven by
owner

Please explain the rationale behind forgiving $4 million of Contractor LDs.

Delay LD's on gas do not start until 60 days after performance test on gas

During our last conference call it was indicated that there would be a stand
down until 7/1/01 when gas is available, no LDs would be paid related to oil
firing performance, and that the LD clock would start if gas commissioning is
not complete within 60 days.  We do not understand the above negotiated point.
Please confirm that our understanding is correct or clarify your negotiated
point.

TAA Agreement

No 12-month look back.

We assume that this negotiated point is related to the time period factored
into
the availability calculation for purposes of determining whether or not an
extension or additional work by the Contractor has been triggered as a result
of
dropping below the availability standards.  Please explain how this negotiated
point affects the mechanics of the TAA and also please explain how
availability
will be calculated.  As we noted during our last conference call, we are
concerned that Siemens believes that the availability value is not reduced if
maintenance work is being performed during periods when the Facility is not
being dispatched.

12 month Initial Guarantee Period, with the clock suspended for gas
commissioning unless owner delay.

We interpret the above negotiated point to mean that the 12-month clock for
the
initial guarantee period stops during commissioning regardless of how long it
takes the Contractor to commission on gas (unless delays are attributable to
Owner) and re-starts after Contractor has successfully completed the
performance
testing on gas.  Please confirm that our understanding is correct.

In order to provide the lenders an adequate warranty period on gas (if
there are additional delays on the P/L) our Insurance group has  indicated
that we will have no problem obtaining 12 months renewable business
interruption insurance when we go operational on gas.  This should solve
the issue over the revised warranty with Siemens because it covers defects,
design, and workmanship on the turbines and includes lost profits, etc.
Incidentally, for insurance purposes the turbines are designated DE3 which
is not a new technology designation.   The duration of BI coverage is 18
months per event with US$150,000 deductible.

Stone & Webster is advising the Lenders to have an insurance advisor review
this
point.

Thanks in advance for your response.  Hope all is well.

Regards,

Bradley


call with EES at 1 pm. 800-713.8600/68266.  jeff


We have received an executed Termination Agreement between ENA and El Paso
Merchant Energy-Gas L.P. ("El Paso"), dated October 12, 2000 but effective as
of December 1, 1999.  This Agreement terminates the ISDA Master dated April
20, 1995, which was assigned to El Paso by El Paso Merchant Energy-Gas
Company on December 1, 1999.  ENA and El Paso then entered into a new ISDA
Master dated June 30, 2000 but effective as of December 1, 1999.  All
transactions should be conducted under the June 30, 2000 Master.


For your viewing pleasure . . .
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001 10:51 AM
---------------------------

"Eric Bass" <dominator128@hotmail.com> on 03/18/2001 03:30:56 PM
To: ebass@enron.com
cc:
Subject:

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - Contract Letter.doc


Hi Mollie and Kate,

Please see the attached letter. Could you please print it on Enron Letterhead
and once signed, fax a copy to Lynda Goodrich at 206-624-7215.

Then, please send the original to Lynda at:

Cascade Natural Gas Corporation
222 Fairview Ave. N.
Seattle, WA 98109

THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!
Laura


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.

(See attached file: NGstocksweeklychange.pdf)(See attached file:
NGstocks.pdf)(See attached file: AGA.pdf)

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com
 - NGstocksweeklychange.pdf
 - NGstocks.pdf
 - AGA.pdf


Stan.  Per your request, here is the update for the first three Year 2000
Goals and Objectives for ETS.

1.  We obtained our FERC certificate, completed construction on the Ft. Myers
lateral, and made initial deliveries to FPL at their plant on October 1.

2.  We have obtained a very favorable Preliminary Determination on our Phase
V project, in spite of having significantly revised the filing on August 1 to
include TECO in the Phase V project.  FERC staff is working on issuing our
Environmental Impact Statement, which has been delayed due to the TECO
filing.   We remain on target, however, for timely receipt of our certificate
to allow construction by the second quarter of next year.

3.  Mr. Hayes and is team are continuing negotiations with prospective
shippers for a Phase VI project.

If you have any questions, please call me.

Rock

---------------------- Forwarded by Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron on 11/27/2000
06:06 AM ---------------------------

Rod Hayslett

11/22/2000 06:47 AM
To: Bill Cordes/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rockford
Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Gary P
Smith/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Virginia
O'Neill/NPNG/Enron@Enron, Ruth Mann/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Houser/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Amelia
Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anne
Jolibois/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Emily Sellers/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ricki
Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Janice Hogan/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON

Subject: GPG YEAR 2000 GOALS & OBJECTIVES

Please provide a status report to Stan, with copies to Cindy Stark and I, on
the goals on the attachment.   We are being asked to provide a report to
corporate NLT close of business next wednesday, November 28th, so your input
is needed
not later than tuesday afternoon.    Your assisatnce is greatly appreciated.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/22/2000
06:41 AM ---------------------------

Stanley Horton
01/17/2000 08:41 AM
Sent by: Cindy Stark
To:

Subject: GPG YEAR 2000 GOALS & OBJECTIVES

Attached is the final version of our "Year 2000 Goals & Objectives".


What's happening here?  Please call ASAP.  Thanks.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/11/99 02:09
PM ---------------------------
From: Rodolfo Freyre AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 08/11/99 07:28 PM
To: Patricia Cini@ECT, Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc:
Subject: Empresa Distribuidora de Energia Sur

Pat,

We are also discussing with EDES (same owners than EDEN) to work out the same
financial products we are planning to offer with EDEN. The only difference
will be the volume: 7 MW.

I%ve asked them their financial statements. Whenever I get them I will faxed
them to you.

Regards,

Rolo


Gary---I think you should write the PX a letter asking:1) where this $ went,
2) whether the Core performance bond has been paid and where that $ went,3)
whether the State has paid them any $ for the block forward positions, 4) has
a claim been made on the CTS performance bond and is it still active given
the State's action, 5)How did they calculate the $17mm chargeback they sent
us, 6)what other $ has been collected to minimize the chargebacks
If anyone has anything else they think we should ask the PX please send Gary
and me a note.

	"Stephen Hall" <schall@stoel.com>
	02/08/2001 11:51 PM

		 To: gfergus@brobeck.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: $80 million

Just a reminder:  The ISO held a Firm Transmission Right ("FTR") auction last
month that netted the California IOUs $80 million.  That money is credited to
their account to reduce their revenue requirement for access charges (it
reduces the amount of money that the utilities' ratepayers pay for
transmission access charges).

As creditors, we should have some claim against that money.

NOTICE:  This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
information.  If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have
received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit,
disseminate, or otherwise use the information.  Also, please indicate to the
sender that you have received this email in error, and delete the copy you
received. Thank you.

Stephen C. Hall
Stoel Rives LLP
schall@stoel.com
tel: (503) 294-9897
fax: (503) 220-2480