Stephanie, I will have Keegan prepare the fed ex labels  for Bear, Goldman
International and Sanford Bernstein. You can insert the cover letter,
doublecheck everything and send them out.  I have already sent faxed copies
where requested.

Keegan, please also prepare for us two fed ex envelopes/packages to John and
Christine as per the instructions in the email below.  Keegan, I am going to
forward to you documents to make copes -- put the copies of the docs in the
package for John.  The originals go to Christine.  As with all, do not send
-- give to Stephanie - she has to insert her cover letter and we have to
insert the signed letter from Kate Cole.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
----- Forwarded by Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron on 04/13/2001 02:48 PM -----

	"Durland, Christine (Exchange)" <cdurland@bear.com>
	04/10/2001 04:25 PM

		 To: "'Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com'" <Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com>
		 cc: "McCarthy, John (Exchange)" <JJMCCARTHY@bear.com>
		 Subject: RE: Enron (ETC)- Third party connection Agreement

Cheryl,

Please find attached an execution version of the third party connection
agreement incorporating all agreed modifications (I also inserted a
black-lined version for your convenience).
 <<Enron.exe.agt new2000.doc>>  <<Enron1.agt new2000.doc>>

If in agreement, please have it signed and returned to John Mc Carthy
(Portfolio Trading Department- 2d Floor- 245 Park Avenue, New York, NY
10167) and a copy to myself at the address below.

Regards,
Christine

Christine Durland
Associate Director
Legal Department- 3rd Floor
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.
Phone  (212) 272-4935
Fax (212) 272-4933

-----Original Message-----
From: Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com [SMTP:Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Durland, Christine (Exchange)
Cc: 'Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com'; McCarthy, John (Exchange)
Subject: RE: Enron (ETC)- Third party connection Agreement

looks good!  Thanx.  Let's move to execute; please send a clean copy.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

                    "Durland,

                    Christine            To:     "'Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com'"

                    (Exchange)"          <Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com>

                    <cdurland@bea        cc:     "McCarthy, John (Exchange)"

                    r.com>               <JJMCCARTHY@bear.com>

                                         Subject:     RE: Enron (ETC)- Third
party
                    04/10/2001           connection Agreement

                    02:00 PM

Cheryl,

 Please review and let me know if the revised language is ok with you.

Christine

 <<Enron.agt new2000.doc>>
Christine Durland
Associate Director
Legal Department
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.
Phone  (212) 272-4935
Fax (212) 272-4933

-----Original Message-----
From:     Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com [SMTP:Cheryl.Nelson@enron.com]
Sent:     Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:15 AM
To:  Durland, Christine (Exchange)
Subject:  RE: Enron (ETC)- Third party connection Agreement
Christine, as a follow-up from yesterday, I wanted to pose a reasonable
solution that addresses your concerns and mine. I negotiated the following
language for a similar agreement:

ENRON SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT UNLESS THEY RESULT FROM ENRON'S WILLFUL VIOLATION OF ANY OF
THE ______ PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT.   (Insert the provisions that
raise any particular IT or other concerns for you).

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

(See attached file: Enron.agt new2000.doc)
_****************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************

 << File: Enron.agt new2000.doc >>

 - Enron.exe.agt new2000.doc
 - Enron1.agt new2000.doc
***********************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************


Below is the text of recommendations taken from the summary of
recommendations in the Cheney Energy Report being released later this morning
that focus on coal and coal-related issues, including environmental.

"The NEPD Group (National Energy Policy Development) recommends that the
President direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to propose multi-pollutant legislation.  The NEPD Group recommends that
the President  direct the EPA Administrator to work with Congress to propose
legislation that would establish a flexible, market-based program to
significantly reduce and cap emissions fo sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides,
and mercury from electric power generators.  Such a program (with appropriate
measures to address local concerns) would provide significant public health
benefits even as we increase electricity supplies.

 Establish mandatory reduction targets to emissions of three main pollutants:
sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury.

 Phase in reductions over a reasonable period of time, similar to the
successful acid rain reduction program established by the 1990 amendments to
 the Clean Air Act.

 Provide regulatory certainty to allow utilities to make modifications to
their plants without fear of new litigation.

 Provide market-based incentives, such as emissions trading credits to help
achieve the required reductions."

"The NEPD Group recognizes the importance of looking to technology to help us
meet the goals of increasing electricity generation while protecting our
environment.  To that end, the NEPD Group  recommends that the President
direct the Department of Energy to continue to develop advanced clean coal
technology by:

 Investing $2 billion over 10 years to fund research in clean coal
technologies.

 Supporting a permanent extension of the existing research and development
tax credit.

 Directing federal agencies to explore regulatory approaches that will
encourage advancements in environmental technology.

"The NEPD Group recomemnds that the President direct federal agencies to
provide greater regulatory certainty relating to coal electricity generation
through clear policies that are easily applied to business decisions."

"The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy
and other relevant agencies, to review New Source Review regulations,
including administrative interpretations and implementation, and report to
the President within 90 days on the impact of the regulations on investment
in new utility and refinery generation capacity, energy efficiency, and
environmental protection."

"The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct the Attorney General to
review existing enforcement actions regarding New Source Review to ensure
that the enforcement actions are consistent with the Clean Air Act and its
regulations."

"The NEPD Group recommends that the President direct federal agencies to
support continued research into global climate change; continue efforts to
identify environmentally and cost-effective ways to use market mechanisms and
incentives; continue development of new technologies; and cooperate with
allies, including through international processes, to develop technologies,
market-based incentives, and other innovative approaches to address the issue
of global climate change.


Can't send you the song I wanted to...never mind.  Did your team get smeared
last night?  - Christina

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


Molly,

We can pay for the plane ticket.
We have to make sure that we shall extend the same
treatment to other summer interns to avoid
bad feelings.

Vince

From: Molly Magee/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/25/2001 11:47 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Jinbaek Kim

We received some correspondence this morning from Jinbaek in which he says he
plans to start on June 4, 2001.   Since we are trying to offer a package
comparable to that of an Associate in the Program, I assume we will also pay
for his plane ticket here???    Just wanted to check before I contacted
him...., so I'll wait to hear from you.

Thanks,
Molly
x34804


Hey, Mom.

I got your e-mail just fine.  Is your computer fixed up now?

Cole had a great time at his birthday party last night.  When we were walking
out of Chuck E Cheese after the party, Cole asked me "Daddy, am I three
now?"  He got some good presents and got to play alot of games.  It took him
forever to go to sleep.  He really loved the Blues Clues game ya'll got him.
The packaging was coming open when he got it yesterday, so Tonya let him open
it before the party.  He played it in the car going to the party and on the
way home.  I think I'm tired of that game.  He can't play it in the car
anymore.  It so funny to watch him play though.  He will repeat the question
and go "hmm".  Anyway I need to go.

D

"PAMELA FARMER" <PFARMER@mpisd.net> on 01/12/2001 02:36:37 PM
Please respond to <PFARMER@mpisd.net>
To: <dfarmer@ect.enron.com>
cc:
Subject: New computer

Hey! Just checking out the new machine.  I sent Cole's birthday present
today.  Hope he gets it on time.  Let me know if you get this message please.


You're definitely not being difficult - it's good for us to know these
things. I'm going to check with Mike Swerzbin on this - he's the trader on
347356 - after the morning trading dies down a bit. Just wanted to let you
know I'm not ignoring you.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/30/2001 07:03 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Deal 506549, 506550, 506551

Sorry, I didn't see these deals when I sent the first email.  Kimberly Hundl
had sent you a note about the contact.  Are these deals like the other two
deals, and should be confirmed totally separately from the deal #347356.
Sorry to be so difficult, but we get into trouble everytime we confirm a
Conoco deal because of the special language that needs to be included on
deals that are part of #347356, and we never get any notes that tell us
whether or not it is part of the extension of the original deal.

Thanks!

---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 08:58
AM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                01/29/2001 06:22 PM

To: Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal 507430 and 507417

Jack Wells is the contact for both - I've added his name to deal #507417.
According to Sean Crandall, these deals are separate from 347356. That deal
was a sale, and the deals entered today are all buys. Sean said we're just
buying back the MW we originally sold them. But I think that's the only
connection. Let me know if you need more of an explanation from the traders,
but our take is that these deals are separate.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/29/2001 04:05 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 507430 and 507417

Are these two deals part of the original Conoco deal # 347356 that they are
extending or something different?  We need to know because we have to add
something in the confirmation if they are extensions of the original deal.
Also, is Jack Wells the contact for both?

Thanks!


Bruce did give us project cost numbers and I will have him e-mail them to
you.  Also, you and I already went through the project eval. form on USEC.
Tom and I were trying to get numbers by Wednesday, but give me a call once
you get the project cost numbers.  Thanks for your help with this project.
Ben


I'm travelling on Monday, so please ask my assistant, Suzanne Adams for a
copy.

I'm new  to this particular group in Legal, so I'm still learning who does
what.  No offense  intended.

This deal has a lot of life and potential, so I look forward to getting to
know you in the process.

Kay

Tom Chapman@ECT
08/04/2000 02:58 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: FW: VEPCO/City of Rocky Mount

Kay-

I am sorry that I have not been able to introduce myself to you, but I was
off getting married during the middle of July, so I have been a little out of
the loop the last couple of weeks.

My name is Tom Chapman and I work in Enron Government Affairs.  My primary
responsibility is to work with and mitigate regulatory risks in North
Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia.  So things like the NCNG gas contract
with the City of Rocky Mount are right up that pathway.  That being said, I
think that Allyson will handle it and is the right person to contact on this
issue because she is our local counsel and would represent us in any lawsuit,
but she did call me to ask me a question, and I had not even seen the note.
This left me a little uncertain as to the context of the discussion.  I had
an inkling, but I would have preferred foreknowledge.  That being said, would
you include me in further transmissions so that I can stay abreast of the
various situations surrounding the Edgecombe plant.

In addition, could you send me a copy of the agreement between the City of
Rocky Mount and NCNG.  Thanks, I appreciate it.

Tom Chapman
EB 4720B


Mark and Jeff,

The Paper & Pulp desk has a customer that they would like to put into a three
year financial deal; however, the credit profile of the customer would
require hefty upfront security.  At the same time, they would like to enter
into a contract wherein ENA purchases all of their production (newsprint) at
index prices.  ENA's payable to this company could run to 10MM/ month.  Can
we draft a netting arrangement that would allow us to net the physical and
financial exposures in the event of a default so that the customer would not
be required to post security for the financial deal?  I think we may have
done something along these lines for a couple of Fred Lagrasta's customers.
I am comfortable that the purchase payable will more than offset the
potential financial exposure, but want to ensure that you are comfortable
that the ability to net these two exposures can be assured through a
contract.  Let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,
Tanya


Greg

Don't forget to ask some option questions.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 01/04/2001 10:45 PM ---------------------------

	  From:  Kimberly Hillis @ ECT                           01/03/2001 10:53 AM

To:	Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherry H Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:	Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Interview on 1/8/01 - Manu Asthana

Thank you for agreeing to interview Manu Asthana Monday, January 8, 2000.

The schedule is as follows and Manu's resume is attached below:

09:00 - 09:45	Rogers Herndon
09:45 - 10:30	Fletch Sturm
10:30 - 11:15	Dana Davis
11:15 - 12:00	Kevin Presto
12:00 - 01:30	Lunch with John Lavorato
01:30 - 02:00	Greg Whalley
02:15 - 02:45	Hunter Shively
02:45 - 03:30	John Arnold
03:30 - 04:15	Mike Maggi

Please plan to meet with Manu in EB3316.  This is the conference room next to Dave Delainey's office.

 - Manu Asthana.doc


monday--LA w/S. Kean re: meeting w/Gov's staff
tuesday--in office
wed--leave for houston
thurs/fri--houston re: EBS meetings

	Joseph Alamo
	11/22/2000 05:45 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lysa
Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: SCHEDULES REQUEST for the WEEK of NOVEMBER 27th

Please forward to me your schedules for this week (November 27 - December 1),
preferably by end of business Monday, November 27th.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation.

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Walsh, Kristin
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 3:37 PM
To:	Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Calger, Christopher F.; Yoder, Christian; Hall, Steve C.; Swerzbin, Mike; Allen, Phillip K.; Belden, Tim; Dasovich, Jeff; Gaskill, Chris; Grigsby, Mike; Heizenrader, Timothy; Kaminski, Vince J; Kean, Steven; Milnthorp, Rob; Presto, Kevin M.; Ribeiro, Claudio; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James; Tawney, Mark; Tholan, Scott; Whitman, Britt; Will, Lloyd; Comnes, Alan; Herndon, Rogers; Lewis, James; Black, Don; Johnston, Robert
Subject:	California Update 6/08/01

CPUC Delays QF Payment Vote
Sources believe that the delay in the PUC vote on paying the QFs 15% of  their undercollected debt is likely a result from both a concern about bankruptcy issues raised by issuing what could be seen as a "preference payment" to the QFs (the PUC does follow these issues out of necessity, given the current environment) and a lack of clarity regarding how to implement the 15% payment.  The delay was unsurprising and characteristic of how the PUC operates.  It is also noted that there are many claims on SoCal's and PG&E's cash flows currently.  Additionally, agreeing to pay 15% of debts to the QFs raises legal issues, in that the utilities would be paying debts to some creditors, but not others.  This could increase the likelihood of an involuntary bankruptcy filing against SoCal by the non-QF creditors.


request_number:  DS-JCG:002
firstname:  Peter
lastname:  Richardson
e-mail:  peter@richardsonandoleary.com
exhibit_wp-02-e-:  JCG-002
page_numbers:  22, lines 11-14
request_text:  Please provide references from BPA's May Proposal, Amended
Proposal and Supplemental Proposal to support the statement, "BPA has
described two pools of augmentation power to serve its loads(."

response_text:  Please see WP-02-E-BPA-09 at 7, lines 6 -16; WP-02-E-BPA-38
at 12, line 20, through 13, line 12; WP-02-FS-BPA-05 at 69, lines 10 - 13.

The following information is from the web server:
1.  Logon: IUSR_GRANITE
2.  Remote Host:  dsl226.usw-1-224.pacifier.com
3.  Remote IP Address:  207.202.224.226
4.  Form URL:
https://secure.bpa.gov/power/secure/psp/ratecase/discovery/wp_02_response.html
5.  Browser Client:  Mozilla/4.76 [en] (Win95; U)


Your message

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Edmiston, John on Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:40:42 -0400
    MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Dallas:DALMXSMB01

 - C.DTF


Please see the attached article in the recent issue of Regulation, Volume 23,
Number 3, 2000:


Thanks for the quick response.  On short notice, Thursday 9/9 did not work.
I have two alternatives:  Friday, 9/10 and Wed., 9/15.  If you could advise
of your availability by the end of today, I can give everyone a firm date.
Thanks.  Sara


Joe:  Per my voice mail, see part (iii) of the above and please revise to
provide accurate description of the condition to which you agreed with
MediaNews.  Just to say "ENA closes on the KPM Lasara L.P. newsprint mill" is
not sufficient.  Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
06:01 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jarrod Cyprow                           04/28/2000 04:44 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


Sorry for the delay - this looks fine to me.

	Julie Ferrara
	06/14/2000 04:56 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: REVISION to Ticker item for Oneok

Please review the ticker below.
Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Ferrara/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 04:54
PM ---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  06/14/2000 04:48 PM

To: Julie Ferrara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: REVISION to Ticker item for Oneok

Julie,

Please see revised ticker.

Thanks,

Changes to US Gas Product Descriptions

In order to improve the clarity of the Product descriptions for products
relating to Oneok Gas Transportation L.L.C., please note that effective June
15, 2000 the description on the website for:

US Gas Phy ONG  has been changed to   US Gas Phy OGT
US Gas Phy Index IF Oneok  has been changed to   US Gas Phy Index IF OGT

ML
---------------------- Forwarded by Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 04:45
PM ---------------------------
Dale Neuner   06/14/2000 04:37 PM

To: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Ticker item for Oneok

I like this........................

To: Julie Ferrara/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelli Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Ticker item for Oneok

Julie,

Could you please put this ticker item out on the Web on June 15, 2000.   Let
me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Melba
58986

Changes to US Gas Product Descriptions

In order to improve the clarity of the Product descriptions for products
relating to Oneok Gas Transporation L.L.C., please note that effective June
15, 2000 the description on the website for:

US Gas Phy ONG  has been changed to   US Gas Phy OGT
US Gas Phy Index IF Oneok  has been changed to   US Gas Phy Index IF OGT


Happy belated Thanksgiving, everyone.

I am sorry to have taken so long to send you this Stacey report. I was down
in Corpus this past Tuesday and Wednesday and then up to Huntsville for
Thanksgiving with my folks, and just returned home this afternoon (Saturday).

Stacey is OUT of the comma!!!!!!! She emerged from it last Sunday. Needless
to say, Carolyn and John are just beside themselves. While I was with them on
Wed. morning, I was able to watch Stacey in her rehab and got to see her
write her name with her left hand. She also, just before I arrived, said
"Momma".  Guess What? I have really seem firsthand the miracle that we have
all been praying for.

I must admit that I was somewhat teary-eyed watching this precious little
girl do things that no one was sure that she would ever do again.  But, there
is still a long way to go.

Stacey's right arm is just kind of hanging from muscle atrophy. And, it is
giving her a lot of pain. (The good thing is that now she can tell the
doctors where the pain is located!) Also, it is going to take several more
months of rehab before she can go home. So, keep the prayers going.

As I entered the room, there was a man there who was leaving. Last December,
he was in an accident that left him in the same shape as Stacey. But now, he
is fully recovered. He came to the hospital because he had seen an article in
the Corpus Christi newspaper about Stacey. He said that he felt that he just
needed to let the family know that there really is hope and that you really
can fully recover. WOW! Does God have a sense of timing or what?

Carolyn wants everyone to know how much she loves you all and appreciates
your concern and your prayers. The hospital let them use a large room for
Thanksgiving Day dinner. They were even going to let Stacey have some of the
food with them. Talk about a Thanksgiving?

Folks, I must tell you that this has been exciting for me to see this miracle
unfold. I have enjoyed hearing from Carolyn and being able to report these
things to all of you. I wish that all of you could get to go and see these
people that we have all prayed for these past few months. It has been quite
an emotional deal for me to have seen a child that no one was sure would even
live and now see her awake and recognizing people around her and laughing and
crying and writing her name. Thanks for what you have done for her through
your prayers. And thanks for allowing me to send you these updates and to be
your eyes and ears. But, as I said earlier, we don't stop here. It's not over
until Stacey is 100%, and she will be! I will stay in touch with Carolyn and
keep you updated.

We do have much to be thankful for this year.  So, let's thank Him who is the
giver of all the good and perfect gifts, even life itself!

Be Blessed!
Kent


Listed below are three positions which have become available in the Portland office.  I have also included information regarding the position, department, hiring manager, and the information session.

Position			Department			Hiring Manager		Information Session
Sr Administrative Assistant	Technical Services		Jody Blackburn			Thursday, May 31 in Mt Rainier at 11:00 am
Senior Specialist		Gov't and Regulatory Affairs	Paul Kaufman/Alan Comnes	Friday, June 1 in Mt Hood at 11:00 am
Analyst/Associate		Origination			JonAlan Page			Monday, June 4 in Mt Hood at 11:00 am

If you would like to be considered for either of these positions, please let Amy FitzPatrick know by close of business on Tuesday, June 5, 2001.

SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT - TECHNICAL SERVICES

Essential Functions
?	Perform complex administrative tasks requiring independent judgment and high skill level and considerable knowledge of administration processes.  Work independently or with minimal supervision.  May give work direction to other clerical or administrative personnel.
?	Regularly compose memos, reports and other correspondence from a brief outline, "sketchy" draft or from verbal instructions.  Determine the most appropriate format and best method of presentation.
?	Greet visitors and answer phones.  Handle callers' requests or route callers to appropriate party.  Have good knowledge of supervisors/department/company's business and consequently be able to handle incoming calls in absence of supervisor.
?	Monitor and control filing systems to ensure accuracy and efficient retrieval of data.  Revise file categories as necessary to meet needs of the department.
?	Open and route incoming mail.  Read most correspondence and either respond for supervisor or attach files/data which will assist the supervisor in responding.
?	Regularly make travel/meeting arrangements based on "sketchy" instructions.  Periodically make independent decisions about details such as best travel schedules, mode of transportation, accommodations, audio visual aids, refreshments, etc.
?	Code invoices using defined code categories and a good understanding of items being coded.  Verify accuracy of dollar amounts and resolve discrepancies.
?	Regularly compile data and prepare related reports.  Assist with data analysis.  Recommend appropriate report format.  May create format and design of reports including monthly reports, bank reports, quarterly reports, and annual reports.  Be open to exercising creative freedom.
?	Create and maintain a network of good working relationships with vendors and all support staff and departments (floor clerks, AP department, Human Resources, Payroll, Legal etc.).
?	Order office supplies as requested, or when supply is running low.
?	Create tracking systems for various reasons (project charges, misc. project detail, work order tracking).
?	Must be detail oriented with excellent organizational skills.
?	Ability to work in an environment that can change from slow to fast-paced (and vice-versa)
?	Ability to identify work priorities and function with very little or no supervision.
?	Ability to work effectively with other administrative staff on the floor.
?	Provide data room support in the sale of an ENA asset.

Essential Job Requirements
?	At least 5 years of secretarial/administrative experience, above average communication and interpersonal skills.
?	Strong PC skills, excellent typing, proofreading, spelling and grammatical skills. Proficient in Word, Excel and PowerPoint.
?	Experience in preparing, formatting, and layout of formal presentations and reports essential.
?	Work is highly confidential; therefore the ability to maintain that confidentiality is crucial.
?	This position has the responsibility to provide administrative support to Technical Services.  Technical Services has accountability for evaluating and managing ENA's technical risk.  This position has the responsibility for supporting technical due diligence, development of new projects, sale of projects, purchase, acquisition and management of projects.
?	Follow through and communication on status of requested tasks is required.

Special Job Characteristics
?	Ability to take the initiative and be resourceful.
?	Must be comfortable approaching people on a daily basis to follow up for information or items needed to complete a task or project.
?	May include minimal travel.

SENIOR SPECIALIST - GOVERNMENT AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

Essential Functions

Analyst will be a part of Government Affairs (GA) Western Region Team to support and expand commercial opportunities for ENA's West Power Trading and Origination organizations.

Under the direction and prioritization assistance of supervisor, analyst would perform a variety of tasks in response to requests from commercial and GA clients, including the following:

?	Perform research and analysis of energy market and regulatory information in both wholesale and retail energy markets. Information sources include electric utilities, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, state public utility commissions, Congress, state legislatures, research organizations, and trade associations.
?	Regularly monitor regulatory proceedings for rulings and events that could affect existing retail or wholesale commercial positions or create new commercial opportunities.
?	Under direction, synthesize and analyze information and prepare results in the form of briefing charts, market intelligence memorandums, and regulatory filings.
?	Assist in responding to request for information and analysis from commercial clients.
?	On occasion, monitor industry and trade events on behalf of Enron and summarize and distribute market intelligence.
?	Maintain on-line resources (spreadsheets, shared directories, intranet sites) that provide commercial clients latest governmental affairs work products and market information.
?	Other duties as required.

Essential Job Requirements

?	BA or BS in public policy, economics or related degree with experience in a regulated industry.
?	Strong communication and data analysis skills are required, including proficiency with statistical software, Excel and PowerPoint.
?	Ability to develop databases and shared information resources (intranet sites) is strongly desired.

ANALYST/ASSOCIATE - TRANSACTION GROUP, WEST POWER ORIGINATION

Candidate will be part of the West Power Origination group, focused on creating and monetizing structured energy transactions in the western U.S., including power plant development, acquisitions and divestitures.  Candidates will become an integral part of the deal teams involved in all aspects of marketing, structuring, negotiation and execution of large transactions.

Role and Essential Skills

?	Primary responsibility will be to accurately model economic and technical aspects of transactions.
?	Candidates will interact with many of Enron's functional areas, including Tax, Legal, Accounting, RAC, Finance, Technical Services and Structuring.
?	Extensive opportunities for commercial exposure and customer interaction will be available.
?	Work environment is fast-paced and unstructured.  Successful candidates have initiative, are team-oriented, flexible and highly motivated.
?	Excellent quantitative skills a must.  Will be required to conduct due diligence and provide economic analysis for transactions.
?	Extensive background in modeling assets, financial structures and commodity positions would be a benefit.
?	Experience with ENA deal approval process would be useful.
?	Knowledge of power generation and power markets would be helpful.


1 (800) 993-3226

Policy# and Claim#
ATT 20045107

Claims Adjuster
Craig Chance Ext. 4342

His managers name is:
Tammy Gregory


Hi Sara.

With all due respect Sara, I have a constructive suggestion for both of us.
In Anna's view, and I agree, it is causing some unnecessary confusion that
you call her to negotiate provisions of the contract that I am negotiating
with her without my knowledge.  It makes both you and I look disorganized and
in doing so, I beleive it undermines our position in negotiating the terms.
As a practical matter, it is extrmemly difficult to negotiate a contract and
administratively organize the execution if I am not sure whether there is
someone else taking steps (especially with outside counsel that I am not
aware of.)   If you have asked me to negotiate an agreement -- as in the case
of Enron Credit Inc. -- and you have an update on the status -- having sat in
on the conference call on Friday, then why not let me do so?  At the very
least, could you call me first for an update or try to include me in the
call.

Equally important, while I am sure that it is not your intent, you are
undermining my morale.  I have constantly kept you updated  -- sometimes on
an hourly basis -- on the status of what is going on with all of the
administrative and legal tasks.   To call outside counsel under those
circumstances  comes across as a vote of no confidence in my work and efforts
which is baffling to me because I think I have worked hard and have
accomplished a tremendous amount with respect to the brokerage agreement
project.   I have negotiated these agreements with a great deal of
thoughtfulness and skill. I have gone above and beyond even to determine
applicable law that no one else was aware of.

Moreover on Friday (again without intending to do so) you undermined my
morale by telling me that there were administrative tasks that needed to be
done.  You said that you hope I know that the agreement does not just become
executed once we sign it.  Sara, it should be obvious to you that I know --
perhaps better than anyone else -- what administrative tasks need to be
accomplished to open this kind of brokerage account.  I have even figured out
that there are administrative tasks beyond what any one else is aware, for
example, in the case of the ancillary NASDAQ agreements, that no one else was
aware had to be completed.  I have proven already that I can execute all of
the administrative tasks in an expedited manner.

I want these comments to be taken in the spirit in which they are given --
which is that we both mean well and are working toward a common goal and that
everyone can learn from anyone.  I look forward to talking to you further so
that we do not let the frantic nature of our work make any one feel that
their efforts are not valued.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


Confirmed w mark taylor. Without the language on assignment in the lc, if you move the underlying trades to a permitted affiliate, the lc would not follow. So the language does have value.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Bruce Fehring
P.O. Box 565
Kilauea, HI 96754
fehring@aloha.net

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Bruce Fehring


The GCP team using the following distributions lists in Lotus notes

Enron Europe Global Counterparty
Enron Europe CP Name Changes

Regards

Stuart

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thistleton, Tara
Sent:	29 October 2001 09:16
To:	DL-Lon European Trading Support
Subject:	FW: Mailing Groups/Distribution Lists to be migrated to Outlook
Importance:	High

Does anyone have any email lists that they still use from Lotus Notes - (apart from the main team lists and Michael Kass's Team lists?).

Let me know the addresses and I can get a new mailing list set up in Outlook for you.

many thanks from Tara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schaafsma, Alison
Sent:	26 October 2001 15:08
To:	DL-Lon Assistants Group
Subject:	Mailing Groups/Distribution Lists to be migrated to Outlook
Importance:	High

Reminder!!!

Please circulate this message to team members/department heads where you feel it is appropriate. Thanks

A mailing group is a collect of people that you email under one common name e.g. Enron London Assistances. In Outlook these are called distribution lists.

We need to migrate all Lotus Notes mailing groups to Outlook.

If you are responsible for a mailing group, or you have a mailing group for your team, can you please send me the name of it.

If you have any questions please feel free to call me.

Thanks and regards
Alison
37764


I am looking for a way to assist a co-worker that is under stress with a wife with health problems, a baby and two other children at home.  I am interested in getting details about how I might pre-pay for a two-week personal chef service.

Could you give me a quote on two-week service to this family located in the Copperfield area?
Could the gift recipient select the menu items?

Shelley Corman
713-853-7083


"Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have
come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the
first." -- Ronald Reagan


Yeh, I finally figured that out just after I sent the e-mail this AM.

Scott Dieball
09/12/2000 01:16 PM

To:   John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   Kay Mann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila Tweed@ECT

Subject:  Re: GE Language  (Document link: John Schwartzenburg)

Thanks John.  FYI the contract language (w/GE comments) is attached at the
bottom of this E-mail.  When you have a minute we can discuss.

John Schwartzenburg
09/12/2000 10:43 AM

To:   Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay
      Mann/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:   Sheila Tweed@ECT

Subject:  Re: GE Language  (Document link: Scott Dieball)

 I think that I agree with the points and comments you folks raised in the
first echange on indemnities below, but don't have the document to refer
to. Scott, please drop by and brief me on these.  Cognizant Gov't? Never
heard of  the term, and itis not one of the usual defined terms. Don't know
how it's used here, suggest you decline andmake them clarify.

LOL ISSUES:
1. I suppose that this is a NY law contract. I  do not think you can
effectively limit your liability for gross negligence or wilful misconduct
in NY. Regardless of choice of law, we generally cannot get this limited
or excluded in contracts with owners, either.  I think you should not
accept any GE attempt to limit this by means of the cap on liability or
otherwise , and should avoid muddying the water on the point by taking any
"to the fullest extent permitted by law" clause or other  such stuff as a
compromise. It will be important every time we wrap the GE equipment.

2. Generally, I do not think they should be able to limit their indemnity
for Haz Mat, patents, etc.

3. They have consistently refused to clarify that the indemnity  for all
third party losses includes third party consequentials when Brian or
whoever else over here has been the lead negotiator with GE in the past. I
would like to think that we could get it clarified now that the larger
Enron is working it.  Please try it again if you can.

Scott Dieball
09/11/2000 07:29 PM

To:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:   Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
      Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martin W
      Penkwitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
      Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON

Subject:  Re: GE Language  (Document link: John Schwartzenburg)

See my comments in blue below.

To:   Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Brian D
      Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
      Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martin W
      Penkwitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
      Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  GE Language

I'm not particularly wild about many of the changes proposed by GE.  Agree.
Seems that it would be a good idea to get a consensus on how to respond.
Here are the issues I see:

Indemnity issues:
They should indemnify us from claims by their employees/subcontractors.
Kay - Is your comment in connection with GE's comment to Section 27.1(iii)
(carve out of the 100% LOL for "gross acts" of its subcontractors, vendors,
ect.)?  GE is in an aggressive outsource mode and needs to remain solely
and totally responsible for the actions and liabilities for its
subcontractors and vendors.  I think Section 20.2(a) as written covers
simple negligence of GE's subcontractors and vendors and I would argue that
we need to keep Section 27.1(iii) as written dealing with gross negligence
of GE's subcontractors and vendors.
Indemnity should be triggered by strict liability as well as negligence.
Agree - Maybe we could agree to GE's strike out in 20.2(a) provided the
phrase "negligent or willfully wrongful" is replaced with "negligent, at
fault or strictly liable without fault" (or some variation thereof).
What is a cognizant government?  Don't know!  This was not discussed with
MIke so I am not sure what is the meaning of adding this term.  We need to
also think in terms of how we could be harmed in a situation where GE fails
to comply with law, and instead of Enron incurring a monetary penalty, is
ordered to shut down the facility.

Limit of liability issues:
They want to limit their indemnity obligations for complying with laws,
patent infringement, liability for haz. waste and liens to 100% of purchase
price.
They want the limit of liability to apply to gross negligence, if possible.
Agree - See 1st comment above re indemnity.
They don't want to clarify that they have to indemnify us for another
party's claim for consequentials (as in a personal injury claim).  Agree.

We've don't have anything concrete on assignment yet.  Agree.

Comments?  I suggest we get together before our next scheduled conf. call
to discuss our game plan.

Sheila has asked that we change Wednesday's call to 1100 Central, or 100
Central if 1100 doesn't work.  Is this a problem?  Works for me...just let
me know when, where, ect.

Kay

They should have to
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/11/2000 04:07
PM ---------------------------

michael.barnas@ps.ge.com on 09/07/2000 07:46:07 PM

To:   stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, Sheila.Tweed.@enron.com,
      Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com,
      Scott.Dieball@enron.com, Martin.W.Penkwitz@enron.com
cc:   kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject:  GE Language

Folks,

Having conferred at last with my colleagues, I can now forward to you our
draft language for the Indemnity and LOL clauses.  As Steve mentioned in
his
earlier message, he has suggested some issues to discuss which could bring
us closer to resolution on that issue.  Please let me know if you have any
question!

Best regards,

     Mike
g _____________
Michael C. Barnas
Counsel, Power Plants Commercial Operations
GE Power Systems
One River Road - Building 37, Room 307
Schenectady,  NY 12345  USA
Phone 8*235-7602       (518) 385 7602
Fax     8*235 5466        (518) 385 5466
Mobile 518 369 9538

(See attached file: MajorClausesGE01.doc)

 - MajorClausesGE01.doc


Presentations for Monday's 2-3 meeting in 44C1.  Please let me know if you
have changes prior to that meeting. thanks.


FYI

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 03:27 PM -----

	Stephanie Panus@ENRON
	05/21/2001 11:54 AM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment
(increase from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et
al

You may want to clarify this with Keegan as 1) your voice mail was full on
that Friday, 2) Keegan tried to contact you in New York and the number she
had for you was disconnected, and 3) we tried to locate the documents that
Friday and were not able to.

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	05/21/2001 11:00 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate
		 cc: Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment
(increase from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et
al

Sara,

Moreover, Keegan represented to me that you requested that she locate for you
the Securities Loan Agreement for you while I was out and that she went into
my office and retrieved that document from my Enron Credit Inc. file and gave
it to you.  So, I am not sure of the source of confusion about not being able
to find my file but for future reference, the best thing to do is to ask
Keegan how to contact me immediately and directly - when out the office she
always knows how to reach me.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/

	Cheryl Nelson
	Sent by: Cheryl Nelson
	05/21/2001 10:36 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Re: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment
(increase from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et
al

Sara:

I will forward the documents to you.

For future reference, if anyone is looking for a file for an urgent matter
while I am out, she should convey that fact to me by either (1) leaving a
voice mail - as I checked my voicemails on Friday (that is how I was able to
speak with Tom from New York on Friday) or (2) advise Keegan and she will
contact me immediately by cell phone as she did regarding other matters on
Friday.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	05/15/2001 03:45 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tom Doukas/Enron@EnronXGate, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron Corp./Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI") guaranty amendment (increase
from USD25 Million to USD100 Million) in favor of Bear, Stearns, et al

Cheryl:

I spoke with Clem and he is preparing the amendment for immediate execution
as the signers will be at an offsite tomorrow.  I'll let Tom know as soon as
the amendment has been executed.  Anna Meytina is on vacation so I left a
message with Sharon Chernick.

In order to complete our files with respect to the Enron North America Inc.
("ENA") Securities Loan Agreement, please provide me with copies of the
following documents:

(1)  assignment of the Securities Loan Agreement from ENA to ECI (or was a
separate agreement with ECI executed?)

(2) termination of the prior Enron Corp. guaranty on behalf of ENA in the
amount of  USD25 Million

I spoke with Stephanie and she could not locate your Bear/ECI files on Friday
of last week.

Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


After 2 parties, I'm getting party burn out.  How bad is that?

Kay


thanks lara.


Group,
Just a quick reminder.  We have a meeting April 11 at 4:30 in the afternoon.
We will review ytd performance of the group, areas where we are doing well,
and areas for improviement.  Please bring your thoughts and material to take
notes.  We will also have a couple Hot Lips Pizzas again.

Additionally, I have not heard from all of you regarding the class on April
27th and 28th.
The course is Electric System Operation for the Non-engineer.  The course
highlights include:
Generation
Transmission and Overhead
Distribution Systems
Underground Distribution
Switchgear
Voltage Control
Matching Generation

The course will purportedly provide a comprehensive understanding of system
operations including fossil fuel, hydro and nuclear generation, transmission
and distribution.  The course should provide not only technical information
but also economics of operation, system and equipment protection and safety.

If I have not heard from you by Noon on the 11th, I will assume that you are
not interested.
Thanks,

Bill


The following persons are currently in the Financial Nat Gas / Liquids
Confirmations group:

Joe Hunter  Manager
Diane Anderson Reviewer/Lead
Jean Bell  Nat Gas Confirmations and verbal confirm
Julie Brewer  EOL and Exotic
Bianca Ornelas  Liquids Confirmations and verbal confirm
Angie Guillen  Confirms for Counterparty confirming agent

I am also responsible for Weather and Pulp/Paper financial confirmations.
Those persons are:

Celeste Cisneros Weather
Tiffany Williams  Pulp/Paper & Steel.

Thanks,
Joe


[IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    Dear Patrice,   Get  Approved for an Unsecured Gold Credit Card Instantly Online!   Now you can get Guaranteed instant online Approval for an Unsecured  Gold Credit Card with a $5,000 credit line. That's right!!! As long  as you are at least 18, a U.S resident with at least $800 in monthly  household income and are not currently in bankruptcy, your APPROVAL  IS GUARANTEED! Enjoy great merchandise while improving your credit  because the USA Gold Card reports your good credit to all three  major bureaus.   We  want to help you establish or reestablish your credit today!   Sincerely, Your New Offers Staff[IMAGE]


Thanks for your email.  Please call me when you have a chance.

Jeff
713 853 1761

"Chris Handte" <handtec@wharton.upenn.edu> on 09/26/2000 10:06:14 PM
To: <jeff.shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Opportunities in Japan

Hi Mr. Shankman,

I am a second year finance major at Wharton.  I left a voice mail for you
the other day in which I mentioned my interest in pursuing finance
opportunities in Japan.  I have extensive experience in Japan and am looking
to go back and take advantage of some of the fascinating changes that are
occurring over there.  I will try calling you again this Thursday to
hopefully discuss Enron's strategies and opportunities more specifically.  I
have attached my resume for your consideration.  I look forward to talking
to you.

Sincerely yours,

Christopher Handte
________________________________

Christopher Handte
Wharton MBA Candidate, Class of 2001
4300 Spruce Street, Apt. C-104
Philadelphia, PA 19104
215-382-8744
E-Mail: Christopher.Handte.wg01@wharton.upenn.edu

 - RESUME - Christopher Handte.DOC


(See attached file: HPLN0125.xls)

 - HPLN0125.xls


Kim,

Should I be worried that I haven't book movers yet?

Chris


I forwarded the email to GE and received no comment back.

Kay

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 12/10/2000 02:22 PM
To: "Taylor, Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Lisa Bills (E-mail)"
<Lisa.Bills@enron.com>, "Roseann M Engeldorf (E-mail)"
<Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>, "Bunk, Sean" <seanbunk@akllp.com>, "Sheila
Tweed (E-mail)" <Sheila.Tweed@enron.com>

Subject: Re: Winston & Strawn Comment: Consents to Assignment

Kay mentioned to me (I think it was on Friday) that she may be talking to GE
about this - don't know if she did or what the outcome was, so stay tuned.

Thanks,

Rose

	"Taylor, Rob" <robtaylor@akllp.com>
	12/08/2000 12:12 PM

		 To: "Roseann M Engeldorf (E-mail)" <Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com>, "Kay Mann
(E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Sheila Tweed (E-mail)"
<Sheila.Tweed@enron.com>, "Lisa Bills (E-mail)" <Lisa.Bills@enron.com>
		 cc: "Bunk, Sean" <seanbunk@akllp.com>
		 Subject: Winston & Strawn Comment: Consents to Assignment

Winston & Strawn has asked that the following be added to the Consents
to Assignment (e.g., in the "Successors and Assigns" paragraph):

"WestLB is an express third-party beneficiary of this Consent."

Please forward the revised draft of the GE Consent to Winston & Strawn
(toxley@winston.com).

Regards,

Rob Taylor
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
600 Travis Street
Suite 4200
Houston, Texas  77002

Tel: (713) 220-4436
Fax: (713) 238-7273
e-mail: robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com

This e-mail is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
(i) do not read, copy, use or disclose the contents hereof to others
(any of the foregoing being strictly prohibited), (ii) notify the sender
immediately of your receipt hereof, and (iii) delete this e-mail and all
copies of it.


You have received either a FedEx, UPS or other package in the mailroom on
2/17/00.  They will delivered on the 11 o'clock run.  If they are either too
large or too heavy to fit on the mail cart, or are non-priority,  they will be
delivered prior to 4 PM.  Any questions please call 8505.

Thanks
MA


Dear E-Savers Subscriber,

Here are this week's E-Savers for travel departing Saturday, January 19 and returning Sunday, January 20; Monday, January 21; or Tuesday, January 22.

PURCHASE E-SAVERS ONLINE AT http://www.usairways.com/esavers/offer.htm AND RECEIVE A $10 DISCOUNT OFF THE FARES LISTED BELOW.  THE $10 DISCOUNT DOES NOT APPLY WHEN BOOKING BY TELEPHONE THROUGH US AIRWAYS' RESERVATIONS DEPARTMENT.

Tickets must be purchased at the time of reservation.

********************************************************************
Speed your check-in with US Airways' E-Ticket Check-In Kiosks, now available in Charlotte, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh in addition to Boston Logan, New York LaGuardia and Reagan Washington National airports. To use, simply touch the screen, insert and remove your Dividend Miles card or credit card, select a seat and collect your boarding pass. An agent will assist you with checked baggage. Plus, earn 1,000 bonus Dividend Miles on first use and 50 miles for each use thereafter, through March 31, 2002.
********************************************************************

FROM:                     TO:                       ROUNDTRIP FARE:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Baltimore, MD             Atlanta, GA               $129 (C)
Baltimore, MD             Buffalo, NY               $99 (#1)
Baltimore, MD             Columbia, SC              $119 (*)(#9)
Baltimore, MD             Greensboro, NC            $119 (#1)
Baltimore, MD             Toronto, ON               $129 (#9)

Philadelphia, PA          Boston, MA                $119 (*)
Philadelphia, PA          Charlotte, NC             $139
Philadelphia, PA          Chicago O'Hare, IL        $139
Philadelphia, PA          Cincinnati, OH            $119 (*)(#4)
Philadelphia, PA          Detroit, MI               $129 (*)
Philadelphia, PA          Houston, TX               $159 (*)
Philadelphia, PA          Jacksonville, FL          $139 (*)
Philadelphia, PA          Knoxville, TN             $129 (#10)
Philadelphia, PA          Milwaukee, WI             $119 (#6)
Philadelphia, PA          Nashville, TN             $129
Philadelphia, PA          Toronto, ON               $129

Roundtrip purchase required.  Fares shown do not reflect the $10 online discount.

(*) Indicates available for travel originating in either city
(C) Indicates travel requires a connecting flight
(#) Indicates travel is wholly on US Airways Express, served by the following
    carriers:
    1. Allegheny
    2. Allegheny/Trans States
    3. Chautauqua
    4. Chautauqua/Mesa
    5. Chautauqua/Piedmont/Colgan
    6. Mesa
    7. Mesa/CCAIR
    8. Mesa/Trans States
    9. Piedmont
   10. PSA
   11. PSA/Trans States
   12. Trans States

Fares shown are based on roundtrip Coach travel on US Airways/US Airways Express, during the period specified above.  Depending upon your travel needs, alternative routings may be available at the same fares, with part of the service on regional aircraft operated by US Airways Express carriers Allegheny, Air Midwest, CCAIR, Chautauqua, Colgan, Mesa, Piedmont, PSA, Shuttle America or Trans States.

For travel this weekend, call 1-888-FLY-E-SAVERS and request one of the E-Savers listed above. Or, to make your reservations online and save $10, please visit us at http://www.usairways.com/esavers/offer.htm

Reminder: Make sure your Dividend Miles account number is in your E-Savers reservation, so you can earn miles for worldwide award travel on US Airways and our partners. To enroll in Dividend Miles, go to http://www.usairways.com/dividendmiles/index.htm
To earn even more miles, book E-Savers using your US Airways Dividend Miles Visa card. To apply for the Dividend Miles Visa card issued by Bank of America, please visit us at http://www.usairways.com/dmcreditcards

Please note:  Online booking mileage bonus does not apply to E-Savers.

********************************************************************

       LAST-MINUTE WEEKEND RATES FROM WESTIN HOTELS & RESORTS,
   SHERATON HOTELS & RESORTS, FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON, ST. REGIS,
                 THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS

SAVE 35% OFF YOUR HOTEL STAY THIS WEEKEND!

Here are just a few examples of last minute weekend rates available online.
Visit http://promo.starwood.com/csus for a complete list of hotels and to book these Last-Minute Weekend Rates:

City            Hotel                                         Rate
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta         Sheraton Suites Galleria-Atlanta              $76.00

Boston, MA
Newton          Sheraton Newton Hotel                         $75.00

Chicago O'Hare, IL
Chicago         Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers            $129.00

Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX
Dallas          The Westin Galleria Dallas                   $169.00

Detroit, MI
Southfield      The Westin Southfield Detroit                 $69.00

Harrisburg, PA
York            Four Points by Sheraton York                  $74.00

Houston, TX
Houston         The Westin Oaks                              $110.00

Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis    Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel and Suites        $71.00

Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN
Minneapolis     Four Points by Sheraton Minneapolis           $77.00

Montreal, PQ
Laval           Sheraton Laval Hotel                          $77.00 CAD

New York LaGuardia, NY
New York        Sheraton New York Hotel and Towers            $77.00

Newark, NJ
Elizabeth       Four Points by Sheraton Newark Airport        $89.00

Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia    Four Points by Sheraton Philadelphia Airport  $64.00

Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh      Sheraton Station Square Hotel                 $84.00

Providence, RI
Providence      The Westin Providence                         $95.00

San Diego, CA
San Diego       Sheraton San Diego Hotel and Marina           $58.00

San Francisco, CA
San Francisco   The Westin St. Francis                       $156.00

Toronto, ON
Toronto         Four Points by Sheraton Toronto Lakeshore     $85.00 CAD

Washington National, DC
Washington      The St. Regis Washington D.C.                 $71.00

For complete terms and conditions on hotel rates listed above, visit http://promo.starwood.com/csus

********************************************************************

E-SAVERS FARE REQUIREMENTS: Fares do not include a $3 federal excise tax which will be imposed on each flight segment of your itinerary.  A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and a landing.  Canada fares do not include total government-imposed taxes and fees of up to $35.  One-way travel, stopovers, wait-listing, standbys are not permitted.  Travel must begin and end in the same city.  Tickets become nonrefundable 24 hours after making an initial reservation, however, changes may be made for a minimum $100 fee for the continental U.S. and Canada, provided changes are within the allowable days of travel and seats are available.  Tickets must be purchased at the time of reservation and made in advance of travel.  Saturday night stay required.  Maximum 3 day stay allowed.  Fares do not include up to $18 airport passenger facility charges, where applicable.
Fares are valid for travel commencing Saturday and all travel must be completed by the following Tuesday.  Seats are limited and are not available on all flights/days.  Fares cannot be combined with other fares, discounts, promotions or coupons.  Fares will not be honored retroactively or in conjunction with the exchange of any partially used ticket.  Lower fares may be available in these markets.  Other conditions apply.

This is a post-only mailing sent to scorman@ENRON.COM.  Please do not respond to this message.  To change departure city preferences or un-subscribe from this list, please visit the E-Savers enrollment page at:

http://www.usairways.com/esavers/enroll.htm

Copyright US Airways 2001.  All rights reserved.


Stephanie,

We are breaking up our Central Midcon region into two books beginning July
1.  To facilitate this, Sitara has set up two new internal books:  ENA-IM Mid
Central South & ENA-IM Mid Central North.  It would be helpful if we could
have any physical June EOL deals continue to be booked to ENA-IM Central but
all physical July-out deals booked to the new books.  The two traders
involved are Kelli Stevens and Ed Smith.

 Kelli Stevens ENA-IM Mid Central South
 Ed Smith ENA-IM Mid Central North

Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do to expedite this
request.  Thanks for your help.

DG    3-9573


Today, Friday, March 22, Steve Cooper left the following voicemail for employees. Since some employees do not have access to voicemail, we are providing the following transcript of that message. Please note that the retention and severance plan mentioned in the transcript is for the debtor companies of Enron.

You can also access this message and past messages at:  http://home.enron.com/updates/.
***********************************************************************************

Steve Cooper
Voicemail Message
Distributed Friday, March 22, 2002

Hi everybody, it's Steve Cooper.  It's Thursday evening, March 21.  I'm sorry I haven't gotten to you earlier this week, but we've been finalizing and dotting the I's and crossing the T's on the retention and severance plan.  It's that I want to update you on.

We've continued to present and represent the plan to the Creditors' Committee, and now they are comfortable with it and in support of it, which is all good news.  In order to be able to motion this up to the court, we are in the process of finalizing all the various documentation necessary -- the plan itself, the motions, the applications so on and so forth.  I am relatively confident that we will have this motioned up next week sometime.  This has gotten pushed back a number of times, but I think we now have it on track and hopefully next week will be the week.

I do apologize for the way this thing has gotten delayed.  Now that I have worked with a number of you over the last month or two, I see how quickly you move and how quickly you are used to moving - so, I've got to believe that this has been incredibility frustrating for all of you.  Once we get this motioned up, there is a notice and objection period before the court order is approved and the plan goes active.  I can't guarantee you that it's going to go active.  But, I'm pretty confident - in fact, I'm highly confident - that with the endorsement of the Creditors' Committee, the court will approve it.

However, we are not going to wait until we get approval to share the details of the plan with you.  We will put a process in place so that over the next week or so we will hold one-on-one meetings with all of you to discuss the individual participation and what these plans are going to mean to each and every one of you to eliminate to the greatest extent possible the uncertainty that everyone has been living with over the last several months.

The plan is retroactive to March 1, regardless of when the court approves it, so I want everybody to know that will be the start date.

On another subject, the merit increases and promotions for employees in the debtor companies have been finalized and communicated, with the possible exception of some MD's and VP's.  Hopefully, you have all been notified about those promotions.

On the merit increase side, I believe they have all been finalized for all employees below the vice president level.  Hopefully, by now you have received information as to what those increases are.  If you haven't, I would encourage you to speak to whoever you report to.

Everything else is moving forward.  I think we now have the employees meeting scheduled for April 11, and I'm looking forward to seeing and meeting more of you at that get together.  We are on target for pulling together a longer-term business plan for the company, and hopefully will be able to describe it to you in some detail on April 11.

We're exchanging information and communicating with the creditors on a more regular and steady basis.  Those relationships are beginning to settle down.  I think there is actually a lot of good news that I can impart to you over the next several weeks.

I want to thank everybody for your continued efforts and understanding.  Again, I want to apologize for the way this thing has dragged, but I can assure you that Jeff McMahon, the Human Resource people, and myself have all been working like busy bees to get this program finalized and in place.  Knock on wood next week is the week.

Everybody have a great evening.  If you have any concerns, issues, or problems, please don't hesitate to give me a buzz or an Email and I will get back to each and every one of you as soon as I can.  Have a great night and thanks again for all your support, help and dedication to the ongoing Enron organization.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 10/21/99 02:12
PM ---------------------------

Return Receipt
Your document:	Re: Financial Trading in Brazil
was received by:	David Ricafrente/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
at:	10/19/99 02:05:29 PM


Lee informed me today {7/12th}  that Global Octane has experience
"operational" problems beginning last night and will be down until further
notice.

  Note:  This outage is considered "Force Majeure"  thus, whatever flows
during this time period should be allocated to the "term" deal.

 Lee was very specific toward this issue not being a buyback.

Howard, Please forward this information to whomever need it in
Settlement....thanks.


okay i will answer your questions.  i made more money the first time you
stayed over than i lost the second time you stayed over so i am net up.  here
is a simple equation to explain:   2x -1x = x.    x is still positive.    i
watched the show and i can't believe that i am that in to it.  so what are
your rumors?  you have to tell now.


calendar as fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/19/2000 10:47 AM -----

	James D Steffes
	12/18/2000 09:58 AM

		 To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Dan Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Thane Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A
Linton/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Monthly Regulatory Meeting

Please add these dates / times to your calendar.  It will be critical to
attend.  We are trying to set up once a month meetings with East Power to go
over continued RTO efforts.

Please come prepared to discuss key issues in your RTO / region.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 12/18/2000 09:44 AM -----

	Tamara Jae Black@ECT
	12/15/2000 03:03 PM

		 To: Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug
Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christy
Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Monthly Regulatory Meeting

Please mark you calendar for the Monthly Regulatory Meeting to review the RTO
Progress and Measures Scorecard.  The dates are as follows:

Jan. 4th  rm 30C2 3 - 4pm  Conf. number to call if out of the office rm 30c2
713/853-0302

Feb. 6th  rm 30c1  3 - 4pm  Conf. number to call if out of the office rm 30c1
713/646-8670

March 6th rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

April 3rd rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

May 1st  rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

June 5th rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

July 10th rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

Aug. 7th  rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

Sept. 6th rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

Oct. 2nd rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

Nov. 6th rm 30c1  3 - 4pm

Dec. 4th rm 30c1  3 -4 pm

Please forward all questions to Lloyd Will at x33383.

Thanks Tjae


Susan,
I'm assuming that Ms. Corman is "all over this."  I was wondering whether you
intended to go to D.C. also to represent TW's interest in the proceeding?  If
not, may we assume that Shelley will give us a complete report on the meeting
and FERC's next steps?

I note with curiosity the reference in the GD article to the fact that
parties apparently were asking whether pipelines "needed" to offer new
services?  Do you know the background behind this issue?  It may have some
bearing on the Transport Options filing as at least one party I believe
questioned why TW was even offering this new service.  In addition to the
question of affiliate relationship/behavior, the question of market power
(ie. capacity hoarding) apparently is ripe for discussion also during the
Jan. 31 meeting.

Do you know if we are working to prepare comments or a position paper to
submit to FERC by Jan. 5?

One last thing, how should we proceed with respect to coordinating the timing
of our technical conference on Transport Options with this pending meeting at
FERC?  Do we gain more by attempting to schedule a technical conference
before the FERC meeting or after?   It seems to me that if the technical
conference was held before the FERC meeting, all protest issues related to
affiliate marketing rules and/or capacity hoarding questions could easily be
set aside pending the outcome of the FERC meeting and/or any subsequent FERC
rulemaking on the matter.  However, I question FERC's appetite to conduct the
technical conference prior to the Jan. 31 meeting when it is known in advance
that the affiliate marketing rules figure so prominently in the case.  What
do you think?

Regulatory roundup
FERC is getting ready to resume the industry dialogue on promoting
competitive interstate
transportation markets. In an order issued last week, the commission fixed
the date for a
staff conference on one of the most contentious topics in the industry:
affiliate transactions.
The meeting * the second in a series of three * is scheduled for Jan. 31.
Comments
and requests to participate are due by Jan. 5.

Commission staff will have their hands full with this one. At the first
roundtable on
Sept. 19, FERC tackled efforts to promote greater market liquidity following
the introduction
of Order 637 (GD 9/20).  The discussions were polite, but they failed to
yield a consensus
over the extent to which FERC needs to overhaul rate design.  Likewise, many
in the
energy industry are not in agreement about the need for new pipeline services.
A discussion of affiliate issues promises to be more rancorous.  At the Sept.
19 meeting,
in fact, some audience participants were eager to call attention to affiliate
problems on certain
interstate pipelines.  FERC staff, however, kept a lid on those discussions,
and did not
allow comment on any ongoing case.

On Jan. 31, the discussion will focus on &whether the regulatory policy with
respect to
pipeline affiliates and non-affiliates, as well as asset managers and agents,
should be revised
to reflect the changing nature of the gas market8 and &whether there needs to
be revisions to
the regulations relating to pipeline affiliates.8

At present, affiliate relationships are governed by certain standards of
conduct.  Other
market participants can monitor those transactions through various posting
and reporting
requirements.  But not all pipelines are subject to the same requirements,
and the upcoming
discussion is intended to open a dialogue about the market power implications
of transactions
between pipelines and their affiliates.  The panel will also examine the
relationship
between non-pipeline capacity holders and their affiliates.


FYI.
Cindy:  You might want to ask him if he wants to see this before you print it.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 02/09/2000
06:23 AM ---------------------------

	Dortha Gray
	02/08/2000 07:36 PM

To: Gregory Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Beth Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
Barrett/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Wanda Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John B Echols/HOU/EES@EES, Jill Erwin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George Fastuca/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joseph L Franz/HOU/EES@EES, Tracy
Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Robert Hermann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ronald
Johnson/Enron@Gateway, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tod Lindholm/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mark E Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Drew
C Lynch/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Greek
Rice/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paula Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rex
Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly
Scardino/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharron
Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Eickenroht/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Charles
Cheek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Johansen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Turina/Enron@Gateway, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Georgeanne
Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paige B Grumulaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kerrie
Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kirk Stevens/Enron@Gateway, Edward
Coats/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Joyce/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Frank/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Ginty/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elaine
Overturf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lanai Wolfe/HR/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Barrow/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON, AnnMarie Tiller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Castleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wade Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES,
Patrick Mackin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Howard
Selzer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey E
Sommers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cassandra
Schultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, P
Sreekumar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kerry
Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Nogid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Krysti Knight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha
Eurek/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Tim
DeSpain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon Aulds/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Marlow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric McKee/AA/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Cedric Burgher/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alan Quaintance/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan H
Siurek/Corp/Enron@Enron, rastin@velaw.com
cc: Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Gary Peng/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Enron Corp. 1999 Annual Repot

Attached is a marked draft of the financial portion of the annual report.
Please review this draft and send your comments to Jan Johnson (Ext. 3-3260)
or Gary Peng (Ext. 3-6841) by 9:00 a.m. Thursday, February 10, so we can
incorporate your coments into a draft being e-mailed to the printer on Friday
morning.


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their Manager. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000081799&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000081799
Request Create Date : 1/29/02 9:18:19 AM
Requested For       : scott.neal@enron.com
Resource Name       : Market Data Kobra Basic Energy
Resource Type       : Applications


Hi Louise

We haven't yet - I am waiting for Bruce to return from vacation to discuss
with him.  In the past Bruce has expressed the view that he wants to move
away from the commission charging methodology.  Tim Jones has recently
re-iterated MG's desire to maintain commissions as they get $25m from
commissions p.a.

Will let you know the outcome.

Regards

Amita

Louise Kitchen
28/08/2000 19:18
To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: MG Metals

How did we get comfortable with MG charging commission on transactions?

In fact its the whole thing about them using agreements which are offline?


Dear E-Savers Subscriber,

US Airways is pleased to announce a special Santo Domingo E-Savers offer.

You may depart on Mondays, Wednesdays or Thursdays, between October 15 and October 25, 2001.  Return travel is Mondays, Wednesdays or Thursdays, between October 22 and November 1, 2001.  Saturday night stay is required.  Tickets must be purchased by October 18, 2001.

PURCHASE E-SAVERS ONLINE AT http://www.usairways.com/reservations/index.htm AND RECEIVE A $10 DISCOUNT OFF OF THE FARES LISTED BELOW.  THE $10 DISCOUNT DOES NOT APPLY WHEN BOOKING BY TELEPHONE THROUGH US AIRWAYS' RESERVATIONS DEPARTMENT.

Tickets must be purchased at the time of reservation.

********************************************************************
The FAA has announced new carry-on baggage guidelines for all domestic U.S. flights and international flights leaving the U.S. Passengers are now limited to one carry-on bag such as a "roll-aboard" or garment bag, and one personal item such as a purse, briefcase or laptop computer case. The new guidelines are meant to speed the screening process at security checkpoints. Visit http://www.usairways.com/corporate/current_operations/airport_expectations.htm for more information on the new FAA guidelines and packing suggestions.
********************************************************************

FROM:                     TO:                       ROUNDTRIP FARE:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Albany, NY                Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $275

Baltimore, MD             Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $265

Boston, MA                Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $275

Buffalo, NY               Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $275

Burlington, VT            Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $275

Chicago O'Hare, IL        Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $285

Hartford, CT              Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $265

Indianapolis, IN          Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $285

Manchester, NH            Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $275

New York LaGuardia, NY    Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $265

Philadelphia, PA          Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $255

Portland, ME              Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $275

Richmond, VA              Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $265

Rochester, NY             Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $275

Syracuse, NY              Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $275

Washington Dulles, DC     Santo Domingo, Dom. Rep.  $265

Fares shown are based on roundtrip Coach travel on US Airways/US Airways Express/MetroJet by US Airways, during the period specified above. Depending upon your travel needs, alternative routings may be available at the same fares, with part of the service on regional aircraft operated by US Airways Express carriers Allegheny, Air Midwest, CCAIR, Chautauqua, Colgan, Mesa, Piedmont, Potomac Air, PSA or Trans States.

For travel, call 1-888-FLY-E-SAVERS and request one of the E-Savers listed above. Or, to make your reservations online and save $10, please visit us at http://www.usairways.com/reservations/index.htm

Reminder: Make sure your Dividend Miles account number is in your E-Savers reservation, so you can earn miles for worldwide award travel on US Airways and our partners. To enroll in Dividend Miles, go to http://www.usairways.com/dividendmiles/index.htm
To earn even more miles, book E-Savers using your US Airways Dividend Miles Visa card. To apply for the Dividend Miles Visa card issued by Bank of America, please visit us at http://www.usairways.com/dmcreditcards

Please note:  Online booking mileage bonus does not apply to E-Savers.  E-Savers are not valid for upgrades.  Upgrades are only valid with the purchase of a published adult fare, which excludes all E-Savers and certain promotional and sale fares.

********************************************************************

                        US AIRWAYS VACATIONS

US Airways Vacations is pleased to offer Dominican Republic land packages to provide a complete vacation experience.

Vacations include accommodations at a variety of hotels for up to 21 nights; hotel taxes and service charges.  A variety of optional features including sightseeing tours are available.

EXPERIENCE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC!
------------------------------
Two nights hotel from:

$149   Club Viva Dominicus
$157   Coral Costa Caribe Beach Hotel & Casino
$196   Coral Hamaca Beach Hotel & Casino
$282   Renaissance Jaragua Hotel & Casino

Purchase these land packages online at http://www.usairwaysvacations.com/rese.htm
Simply enter your origin and destination cities, departure date, number of adults, children's ages and click "Search For Vacation."  Choose "Hotel and Car Vacations for 2-21 nights," confirm your departure date and indicate the number of nights for your vacation. Click "Check Availability" and continue with your choices for hotels and options as the system presents them until you reach the final price. You may then purchase your vacation with a secure credit card transaction. If you prefer to speak with a reservations agent, call 1-800-352-8747.

Rates shown are per person based on double occupancy for travel 10/18 - 11/1/01. Hotel space is limited and may not be available at all hotels on all days.  Additional travel dates, hotels and rates are available.  Prices are subject to change with or without notice and do not include miscellaneous hotel charges typically paid by the customer directly to the hotel.  Substantial restrictions apply for refunds.  Other conditions may apply.  US Airways' online booking discount is not available on vacation packages.

********************************************************************

E-SAVERS FARE REQUIREMENTS: Roundtrip purchase required.  One-way travel, stopovers, wait-listing, standbys are not permitted.  Travel must begin and end in the same city.  Tickets become nonrefundable 24 hours after making an initial reservation, however, changes may be made for a minimum $100 fee, provided changes are within the allowable days of travel and seats are available.  Tickets must be purchased at the time of reservation and made in advance of travel.  Saturday night stay required.  Fares do not include up to $18 airport passenger facility charges, where applicable.
Fares are valid to Santo Domingo 10/15-10/25/01, Monday/Wednesday/Thursday, and from Santo Domingo 10/22-11/1/01, Monday/Wednesday/Thursday.  All travel must be completed by 11/1/01.  Tickets must be purchased by 10/18/01.  Seats are limited and are not available on all flights/days.  Fares cannot be combined with other fares, discounts, promotions or coupons.  Fares will not be honored retroactively or in conjunction with the exchange of any partially used ticket.  Lower fares may be available in these markets.  E-Savers are not valid for upgrades.  Other restrictions apply.  Fares shown do not include total government-imposed taxes/fees/surcharges of up to $100.

Copying, using, reproducing or transferring of the material contained herein, in any medium, is unauthorized. US Airways, US Airways Express, MetroJet by US Airways, Dividend Miles and E-Savers are registered trademarks of US Airways, Inc.

This is a post-only mailing sent to kholst@ENRON.COM.  Please do not respond to this message. To change preferences or un-subscribe from this list, please visit the E-Savers page at:

http://www.usairways.com/esavers/enroll.htm

Copyright US Airways 1996-2001.  All rights reserved.

US Airways World Wide Web address:  http://www.usairways.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/25/2000
07:12 AM ---------------------------

Christopher F Calger@ECT
08/24/2000 06:04 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: SDG&E

Steve,

SDG&E came out with the attached RFP for fixed price power.  They are
requesting proposals for several standard blocks through 12/03.  Responses
are due August 30.  ENA/EPMI will be prepared to respond, if appropriate.  In
the meantime, we continue to price the full requirements residential
structure and await any news from the governor's office/legislature.  I can
be reached at 503-464-3735.

Regards,

Chris


In EB32c2  SORRY I HAD THE DATE ON THE WRONG THURSDAY.  IT IS NEXT WEEK.


Rick -- per my voicemail
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:37 AM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	FW: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kingerski, Harry
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Keene, Patrick
Subject:	FW: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

... some recent history.  I had left the message with Rogers Herndon.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keller, James
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Castano, Marianne
Cc:	Kingerski, Harry; Ogenyi, Gloria
Subject:	Re: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

You are correct!  This is not a new issue, but it seems to resurface on a regular basis.  The issue has been pointed out regularly (the first time in connection with the license and regularly thereafter) and each time the business has said not to worry, if they can't cut a deal with New Power they will just pay the $1/MW.  EES has assumed it will pay the $1/MW since day one!

	Jim

Marianne Castano
08/23/2001 08:33 AM
To:	Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Gloria Ogenyi/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:	James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Re: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Harry and Gloria:

Jim Keller and I have indeed dealt with this issue in the past (it actually came up at the time we were applying for our TX marketer license).

 It is my understanding, and Jim, please comment if my information is "stale", that we were going to choose the option set forth in Sec. 39.352(g)(3), which allows us to make a payment into the System Benefit Fund.  This approach was discussed with Dennis Benevides, and then, I believe, with Don Black, and they were OK with our pursuing this course, in lieu of having TNPC provide service to residentials on our behalf.

 Please call me if you have any questions:  814-835-0793.

Marianne

From:	Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/22/2001 04:06 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Marianne - per my voicemail.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ogenyi, Gloria
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Hamb, Edward
Cc:	Blachman, Jeremy; Gahn, Scott; Letke, Eric; Wood, James; Presto, Kevin M.; Curry, Mike; Wagner, Joseph; Misra, Narsimha; Dietrich, Janet; Collins, Patricia; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Ryall, Jean; Shapiro, Richard; Herndon, Rogers; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Ed,

Residential Obligation
Section 39.352(g) of Senate Bill 7 provides that for any REP serving an aggregate load in excess of 300 MW, 5% of the load must consist of residential customers. A REP can fulfil this requirement by:
1. Demonstrating that it directly serves residential load amounting to 5% of its total load
2. That another REP serves the residential load on its behalf, or
3. It pays 1 dollar per MWH of required 5% load into the System Benefit Fund.
 EES can fulfil its obligation by entering into an agreement with New Power to serve residential load on its behalf, or can pay the 1$ per MWH penalty.
There is an annual compliance reporting requirement and EES can demonstrate compliance if it has an agreement with New Power.

EES Contract,
For price to beat customers, the utilities have by Commission rule, the obligation to allow customers to come and go without restraint for the 5 year period conmmencing 1/2/02. The Commission concern may be that Enron will abuse this provision by gaming the system. The Enron contracts as currently written are within the rules as approved by the Commission. Until the utilities move to amend the relevant rules, the Commission can only exercise its displeasure by appropriate oversight and enforcement to determine what conduct amounts to abuse and gaming. I think it will ultimately be a question of degree and pattern of switching. The onus will be on the affiliated REPs to prove abuse and gaming. Fundamentally, it is in the best interest of the market to allow customers to come and go. Customer mobility is the best customer protection in a competitive market. Besides, a restraint on customer mobility could have a chilling effect on competition as it will increase customer inertia. The Commission will carefully weigh any course of action to insure that they achieve a reasonable balance. For larger than 1MW customers, they can agree to long term contracts and a restriction on their ability to come and go.

Please call with any questions,
Gloria
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hamb, Edward
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Ogenyi, Gloria
Subject:	Re: Update: Enron Direct Telesales Initiative in NY, NJ and TX

To:	ehamb@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

get on this.  we need to discuss
---------------------- Forwarded by James M Wood/HOU/EES on 08/22/2001 10:20 AM ---------------------------
From:	Rogers Herndon/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/22/2001 09:27 AM
To:	Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kevin M Presto/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Joseph Wagner/ENRON@enronXgate, Narsimha Misra/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Everyone -

I was just informed by EPMI that there may be a requirement for Retail Energy Providers in ERCOT to serve a certain mix of residential rate class/industrial rate class customers once a certain industrial threshold is crossed (300 Mw of industrial rate class load).

EWS has not set it itself up to monitor such requirements.  Therefore, I cannot comment on the accuracy or details of this requirement.  However, it is something we definitely need to look into.  In addition, we (EPMI/EWS) are getting feedback from the TX PUC that they are not pleased with how they see the pilot and the market structure unfolding.  Specifically, they are not pleased with retail energy providers' contracts that contemplate the right to switch between direct access and tariff (and visa-versa).  We will monitor and need to get more clarity on how the PUC intends to address their displeasure.

On the residential requirement front, someone needs to address this.  Specifically, is this true.  If so, what rate classes are considered industrial vs. commercial?  Is there a similar requirement for commercial load?  Is TI considered industrial?  Do we already have industrial customers in our portfolio?  Who in EES tracks and monitors issues like these as we enter markets?

Mike Curry is in the process of tracking this info down from an EPMI perspective as they are focusing on more of the pure, large industrial customers.  We will share any information Mike receives with the EES group.

RH

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded StdOleLink>