-----Original Message-----
From: 	Rodriguez, Ramona
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:52 PM
To:	Sewell, Doug
Subject:	Please see attached

Doug,
This was sent at 12:00 today.
Thanks,
Ramona

         658
02/06/02    NON-CHECK FINANCIAL DATA FOR REF. #    30203745658
ACCOUNT: 40781075      ENRON CORP-ECT CASH SVC
            AMOUNT      POST DATE  VALUE DATE   CODE      BATCH/TRACK       DUP
         22,500.00       02/06/02    02/06/02    479     650000000571         1
TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION
SAME DAY DR TRANSFER
         GID:LCT20371614200
         FED20020206B1Q8022C002659
         REF:      S053022000156167
         ORDER:    ENA CASH SERVICES
         CR BK ID: 113000609
         CR BK:    JPMORGAN CHASE BANK FORMERLY TEXAS
          COMMERCE BANK NA HOUSTON, TX
         BENEF:    00102612158 RELIANT ENERGY SERVICE
         S, INC. PO BOX 4455 HOUSTON, TX US 772104455
         USER REF:S053022000156167
         DETAILS:WT0206 RELIANT S053022000156167
         INSTRUCT DATE:02/06/02 ADVICE TYPE:MAIL

ENTER  (1)


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Sprecher [mailto:jeffrey.sprecher@intcx.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:54 PM
To: Zipper, Andy
Subject: We contacted the offender

Andy,

We pulled the log ... found the guy ... and told him to knock it off.
Please let me know if there is a repeat performance.

Best regards, Jeff


Whatever you've given to Louise with any EGM counterparties, I'd like so we're all on the same page.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moran, Tom
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:56 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	RE: Semora-Koch-Coastal

Jeff,

Let me send you what I pieced together from Joel Bennett's position at COB last night + my discussions with Peggy Rathmell and her slates.
Give me just a couple of minutes.

tm

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:53 PM
To:	Moran, Tom
Subject:	RE: Semora-Koch-Coastal

What about all the other reports for any EGM counterparty.  I'd like those as well.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moran, Tom
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:52 PM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc:	Brackett, Debbie R.
Subject:	Semora-Koch-Coastal

Jeff,

Attached are the November 2001 WTI, Cushing positions for Sempra, Koch and Coastal.

 << File: Sempra-Koch-Coastal Nov-01 Cushing.xls >>


FYI:  Peabody Coal Sales is not online, but Peabody COALTRADE, Inc. is.

From: Tana Jones on 02/22/2001 09:41 AM
To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Peabody Coal Sales

Per Wayne Gresham, a lawyer in the coal group, we are having a substantial
payment dispute with the referenced counterparty, and George McClellan, the
business person (and a Managing Director), would like to shut them down
immediately for all trading (which appears to be coal and emissions), offline
and online, until this payment dispute is resolved.


On Monday, December 4th, a new version of the Marketing Dashboard will be
rolled out. In order for this new version of The Dashboard to work you will
need to have Internet Explorer 5.01(IE5.01) loaded on your system. If you
already have IE5.01, PLEASE RESPOND, to this message  with a confirmation
that you have IE5.01 or higher loaded. (No other action on your part is
necessary)

If you DO NOT have IE5.01 please follow the instructions below to install it
. then respond to this email that IE5 has been loaded.

If you are uncomfortable doing the upgrade alone or are unsure what version
of IE you have please call the helpdesk 87-7454 and someone will assist you.

Again please respond to this message ASAP - we are looking to have everyone
in Houston upgraded by Dec 1st. The total process takes less that 15
minutes.  If you have any question, comments or concerns please contact the
helpdesk at 87-7454,

Thank you


checking w/Mark Palmer


Attached is the file for the Riverside Unit or "Badlands" for August.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 503-464-8298 or Darren Cavanaugh at 503-464-5105.

Jim


Start Date: 4/21/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042108.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  UNIT_ID: HARBGN_7_UNITS

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred: -825.00 / Final: -824.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/21/01
  TRADING_SC: WESC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


Talk to Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Milnthorp, Rob
Sent:	Thursday, February 22, 2001 9:24 AM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Retail

John, with Pope officially gone, I need someone to run with retail. Dave Forrester (a canadian) had shown interest last year in returning to Calgary but needed his vp promo guaranteed (which we obviously couldnt do). With that now out of the way, what is your thoughts on me approaching him?

Regards
Milnthorp


Nancy,

I don't have details on the meeting on the 20th, but please hold the date
open for us.

Talk to you soon,

Kay

"Nancy Wodka" <nwodka@bracepatt.com> on 07/12/2000 05:19:07 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: VEPCO

Kay--got it on my list.  We have various forms of interconnection agreements
to start with and I will also see if VEPCO has one on file at FERC. What's
happening about the meeting on the 20th--will it take place and if so,
include lawyers?  Many thanks.

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 07/12/00 05:43PM >>>
Nancy,

As difficult as this is to believe, we have been told that VEPCO wants
Enron to take the first crack at the interconnection agreement.  Please put
this on your list.  I will check around here to see if there is a form we
want to use as a starting point.

Thanks,

Kay


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Brandon Schwertner <brandons@calpine.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Brandon+20Schwertner+20+3Cbrandons+40calpine+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:44 PM
To:	Aaron Parvis (E-mail); Aaron Parvis (E-mail 2); Allison Schulz (E-mail); Amanda Moore (E-mail); B. J. Tietze (E-mail); Beth Leibo (E-mail); Blaine Wiley (E-mail); Brendan Weatherman (E-mail); Brent Adams '89 (E-mail); BRIAN BICKEL (E-mail); Brian Griffin (E-mail); Bruce Raney (E-mail); Capital Land and Livestock (Business Fax); Caroline Starry (E-mail); Watts, Christopher; Christian Remmert (E-mail); Cody Schwertner (E-mail); Dan Karr (E-mail); Danny Haskin; Derrick (E-mail); Douglas Moore (E-mail); Erik Bodholt (E-mail); Gary Valdez (Business Fax); Gregg Nichols (E-mail); Gregg Nichols (Business Fax); HEATHER NOAH (E-mail); Heng \"Chin\" Too (E-mail); Heng \"Chin\" Too (Business Fax); Jackie (E-mail); Jean-Pierre Blaise (E-mail); Jean-Pierre Blaise (Business Fax); Jenifer Beard (E-mail); Jennifer Hunter (E-mail); Jenny Madison (E-mail); Jim Robison (E-mail); John Scholl (E-mail); Stepenovitch, Joe; Julia McAnelly (E-mail); Karen (E-mail); Keith Schwertner (E-mail); Kelly Stroud (E-mail); Kelly Stroud (Business Fax); Ken Cuff (E-mail); Jester, Larry; Larry Jester (Business Fax); Lauren Minns (E-mail); Lauren Minns (E-mail 2); Lee Crain (E-mail); LeeAnn Wright (E-mail); Leslie Hoff (E-mail); Leslie Hoff (Business Fax); Linda Schwertner (E-mail); Linda Windle (E-mail); Linda Windle (Business Fax); Mary Hitchcock (E-mail); Memaw and Doug Ferrill (E-mail); Egmar, Niclas; "Niclas Egmar (Business Fax)"@mailman.enron.com; Oscar Garia (E-mail); Pam Vader (E-mail); Paul C. Campbell (Business Fax); Paul Kilmer (E-mail); Peter Drysdale (E-mail); Phil Suchan (E-mail); Quick (E-mail); Ray Connolly (E-mail); Ray Connolly (Business Fax); Ray Schwertner (E-mail); Ray Schwertner (Business Fax); Robin Pitts (E-mail); Rosemary (E-mail); Russell Dennis (E-mail); Russell Schwertner (E-mail); Sam Crazy (E-mail); Spencer Rippstein (E-mail); STEFAN AMLING (E-mail); Stephen Bingham (E-mail); Stephen Karr (E-mail); Steven Eason (E-mail); Steven Gray (E-mail); Steven J. Karvellas (Business Fax); Steven Wilson (E-mail); Technical Support (E-mail); TENASKA (E-mail); Tim Ming (E-mail); Tom Hancock (E-mail); Tonya Clifton (E-mail); Travis Moore (E-mail); Troy Clifton (E-mail); Wendy Jordan (E-mail)
Subject:	A Tribute to the United States

I never send these out so it must be pretty good...
This is from a Canadian newspaper.

AMERICA : THE GOOD NEIGHBOR
Widespread, but only partial news coverage was given recently
to a remarkable editorial broadcast from Toronto by Gordon
Sinclair, a Canadian television commentator.

What follows is the full text of his trenchant remarks as printed
in the Congressional record:

"This Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the Americans
as the most generous and possibly the least appreciated people
on all the Earth.  Germany, Japan, and to a lesser extent, Britain and
Italy were lifted out of the debris of War by the Americans who pour-
ed in billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts.  None of
these countries is today paying even the interest on its remaining
debts to the United States.

When France was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans
who propped it up, and their reward was to be insulted and swindled
on the streets of Paris.  I was there.  I saw it.

When the earthquakes hit distant cities, it is the United States that
hurries
in to help.  This spring, 59 American communities were flattened by
tornadoes.  Nobody helped.

The Marshall Plan and the Truman Policy pumped billions of dollars into
discouraged countries.  Now newspapers in those countries are writing
about the decadent, warmongering Americans.  I'd like to see just one of
those countries that is gloating over the erosion of the United States
dollar
build its own airplane.

Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing
Jumbo
Jet, the Lockheed Tri-Star, or the Douglas DC-10?  If so, why don't they
fly
them?  Why do all the International lines except Russia fly American
Planes?
Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or woman on
the moon?  You talk about the Japanese technocracy, and you get radios.
You
talk about the German technocracy, and you get automobiles.

You talk about the American technocracy, and you find men on the moon.
Not
once, but several times and safely home again.  You talk about scandals,
and
the Americans put theirs in the store window for everybody to look at.

Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued and hounded.  They are here on
our
streets, and most of them, unless they are breaking Canadian laws, are
getting
American dollars from Ma and Pa at home to spend here.

When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down
through
age, it was Americans who rebuilt them.  When the Pennsylvania and the
New
York Central went broke, nobody loaned them an old caboose.  Both are
still
broke.

I can name you 5,000 times when the Americans raced to the help other
people
in trouble.  Can you name me even one time when someone else raced to
the
Americans in trouble?  I don't think there was outside help even during
the
San
Francisco earthquake.

Our neighbors have faced it alone, and I am one Canadian who is damned
tired
of
hearing them get kicked around.  They will come out of this thing with
their
flag
high.  And when they do, they are entitled to thumb their nose at the
lands
that
are gloating over their present troubles.

I hope Canada is not one of those."
Stand Proud America!

For those who are active in the energy business, remember those with whom we
work that have passed.
http://www.capecodonline.com/cctimes/xzdonzxt12.htm


Dan,

Just wanted to wish you, Jane, Jordan, Cameron a very HAPPY THANKSGIVING.

Steve, Sugarbear & I will be hosting Steve's Mom @ our house.

I am really looking forward to the long weekend, with all the craziness thats been happening @ work.

Well take care, we love you all.

Regards,
Susan S. Bailey
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
phone: (713) 853-4737
fax: (713) 646-3490
email: susan.bailey@ enron.com


I do not have the lease agreement.  Check with Ann Elizabeth White, She may
have a copy.

	Janet H Wallis
	01/29/2001 11:52 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Shell - West Hollow

Gary Lamphier is out of the office and has asked me to track down  two
contracts for West Hollow.   I need a Lease agreement and the actually
contract.
I would like to e:mail these to Luther today.  Can you guys help?

Janet   3-5388


I forgot to get with you this morning on this.  I went ahead and changed the
volume to 24,000.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/31/2001 10:13 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Valero's February Gas Nominations

Thanks.
Also, Rohm & Haas, meter 1506, is looking for 24.000 for Feb. instead of
27.000.  They take the swing.  Would you like me to change the deal or keep
it as is?

Daren J Farmer
01/31/2001 08:13 AM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Valero's February Gas Nominations

You can change the tickets.  Thanks.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/31/2001 08:05 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Valero's February Gas Nominations

Daren - I am looking for 5.000/d at meter 1394 and 10.000/d at meter 8018 for
Feb.   Currently it is 10.000/d at 1394 and 5.000/d at 8018.  Can I change
the tickets or will you?  Attached is the confirmation spreadsheet from
Valero.

Thanks.

Aimee

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 07:54
AM ---------------------------

<DyckD@valero.com> on 01/30/2001 02:51:39 PM
To: alannou@enron.com, carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Valero's February Gas Nominations

Amy and Carlos,

Please find attached Valero's baseload natural gas nominations and
designated swing supply quantities for February 1-31 for the Houston and
Texas City Refineries as well as Valero's supply to the Clearlake Methanol
plant.
If you need to reach me please call me.

Dave

Phone: (210) 370-2799
Cell phone at (210) 241-9180
Pager (888) 691-5538

(See attached file: HPL_Noms0201.xls)
 - HPL_Noms0201.xls


I'm gone
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Thanks,

Errol McLaughlin


Attached is the Reply Brief of Pacific Gas  and Electric Company filed today
in I.99-07-003.
?
Stephanie Louie
Secretary to EDWARD  KURZ
 - reply-f.doc


Vince

I wish you and your family all the best. I has truly been my privilege to work with you and get to know you over the last several years. You and your group has taught me a lot and I feel very grateful for this.

It has been a sad ending to a phenomenal period at Enron. The one thing that no one can take from us is the experince we gained and the relationships we've made.

Good Luck and Best Wishes

Berney Aucoin

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaminski, Vince J
Sent: Wed 1/16/2002 4:50 PM
To: Aucoin, Berney C.
Cc:
Subject: RE: Exotica, etc.

Berney,
My last day is Jan 31. The group was disbanded on Tue. Jim Fallon told me not to do anything till I receive a formal letter from him instructing me to transfer the software. He will writwe a letter today.

Vince
--------------------------vince kaminski


Eric-

I revised the contract you sent me to make it site specific.  Those changes
are redlined.  Please note that I have reinserted sections 10.4.1 and 10.4.3
as well as the defined terms that go with them.  These were related to
exhaust temperature and energy.  I know this is a simple cycle plant and they
typically aren't required, but I wanted to see if GE would guarantee it
anyway.  It maybe helpful in the future if Austin Energy goes combined
cycle.  If for some reason GE's lawyers specifically want to leave that out,
then they will probably also want to delete sections 10.4.2 and 10.4.4 (and
their defined terms) since those also talk about specific exhaust
guarantees.  Let me know what they decide.

Exhibit A (site basis conditions) which I also revised was not attached to
your file.  (It's right behind the sign-off pages in my hard copy.)  I
therefor hand marked up a copy and scanned it.  It is now attached as a
separate word file.

Exhibit F is "boiler plate" and shouldn't change.  Exhibit "U" is not in my
hard copy.  My copy only goes up to Exhibit "T."   If you get something from
GE on Exhibit "U", send it to me and I will be glad to review it.

If you have questions, give me a call.  (67550)  I will be in Ausitn
Wednesday and Thursday, but will be available by cell phone (713) 412-6873.

Thanks,
Eric Booth


Mark's got the price in for deal #484076 as $325. He's gone now, but I
checked with Tom Alonso, who also trades on the Short Term Southwest desk,
and he said it's definitely 325. Let me know if the broker still disputes
this. As for 484077, it's in the system as $350 - is that correct?

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   12/21/2000 01:39 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Prebon

Kate,
I called earlier to check out with Prebon, of course all the West guys were
gone to checkout, I spoke to a broker on the NY desk.
Please check the price of deal
484076.01 (Mark Fischer)   $325.00  (broker thought price looked like 330.00)
484077.01                                $350.00

Thanks
Stephanie


Dear UT Team:

As a result of this past Super Saturday, the following 3 candidates have been
extended full-time offers:

Shaleen Miller (512/386-9627)
Max Sell (512/457-8635)
Lydia Kuo (512/476-1725)

That gave us a 100% success rate for this past weekend!

Please feel free to call and congratulate them!

Thank you,
lexi
3-4585


this was not the letter I attached to Shudeish

 -----Original Message-----
From:  jose.dumenigo@ps.ge.com@ENRON
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Rance, Byron
Cc: vadim.nisman@ps.ge.com; Davide.Iannucci@np.ge.com;
lucamaria.rossi@np.ge.com
Subject: FW: ENRON-TRANSWESTERN/PARTICULATES

Byron,

Below is the letter I committed to provide Arnold this afternoon.  I see
that Vadim beat me to it by sending you an earlier email.  As a general
commentary, I would however, like to make the following clarifications on
the subject which ETS may find useful.

Particulate matter in the gas tubine exhaust comes from a variety of sources
and may include smoke, ash, corrosion and erosion products, condensable
hydrocarbons, inlet air particulates and particulates from the fuel and
injected water or steam when applicable.  In addition, SO3 in the exhaust is
generally trapped on a wet collection medium as H2SO4 and may appear as
particulates due to the measurement procedure.

Gas turbines are very clean burning and are not, in general, sources of
significant quantities of particulate emissions when burning good quality
fuels.  With distillate fuel containing less than 0.5% by weight, sulfur,
total particulates at high power are expected to be less than 0.6 lbs. per
1000 lb. fuel as measured by EPA Method 5.  Please note that the method used
for measuring particulate matter can have a significant impact on the
particulate level determined.  For estimating purposes, all particulates may
be considered to be in the size range less than 10 micrometers.

With pipeline quality natural gas, there is virtually no smoke and the fuel
contains no sulfur or ash.  As a result, total engine generated particulate
emissions are generally undetectable by EPA Method 5.  Due to other
particulate sources and the sensitivity of the measurement method, total
particulates with pipeline quality natural gas for the LM2500 are estimated
to be less than 3 pounds per hour assuming cleanliness levels for the inlet
air, fuel, and water/steam injection in accordance with GE requirements.

Regards, Jos,.

 <<Transwestern particulate emissions.pdf>>

 <<Transwestern particulate emissions.pdf>>
 - Transwestern particulate emissions.pdf
 - Transwestern particulate emissions.pdf


Please plan to attend a meeting today at 1:30 p.m. in ECS 5112 to discuss Rate Feeds for UBS.  We need to ensure that everyone will get the rate feeds that they expect to see in the various systems.  We need to make sure that there are no holes in the process!


gerald, the second to the end paragraph, which begins with Consequently and
talks about timing of resolution is unclear in my opinion.....let's talk
about what timeline we are proposing and make sure that we are saying what we
really mean   bng

	Gerald Nemec
	07/27/2000 03:40 PM

		 To: Dan J Bump/DEN/ECT@Enron, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara Gray
		 Subject: Wildhorse Letter

Attached is the latest version of the Wildhorse Entrada Letter.  Please
review.  I reviewed the letter with Jim Osborne and Ken Krisa yesterday and
should get their comments today.  My plan is to Fedex to Midland for Ken's
signature tomorrow morning and from there it will got to Wildhorse.


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron on 05/12/2000
10:58 AM ---------------------------

Shelley Corman
05/10/2000 12:45 PM
To: Jeff Brown/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Electronic Version of EEI Presentation

Here is a copy of a draft presentation for Stan for the EEI meeting next
week.


Ina:
Can you change my meeting with Sheriff's boys to Tueday after 3:00 from
Monday.
Also, stick me on thedistribution for the Enron press pack that has all the
articles in which Enron is mentioned.
Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 01/21/2000 09:54 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kyle R Lilly                           01/21/2000 09:32 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Deal 117413

---------------------- Forwarded by Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT on 01/21/2000 09:31
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kyle R Lilly                           01/20/2000 01:52 PM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deal 117413

Eric,

 On deal 117413 for Dec 99, could you change the first tier from 750,000 to
775,000?  The volume is the first 25,000/d.   I need this in order to get the
Unify invoice to come out correctly.

Thanks,
Kyle


Yes they are two totally different electronic trading systems.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:43 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout Con't

This deal was done on the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE). Jeff thought it
was the same thing as Dynegy Direct. I've changed it to ICE as broker, but
I'm wondering if these are different brokers, or why Jeff would have thought
they were the same....???

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:31 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/13 Checkout Con't

deal 548465
Jeff Richter

Is Dynegy Direct the correct broker because I do not see this deal on their
web checkout?


Dan,

Mike is out of the office so I would kindly request your help. Attached is a
draft letter provided by Vitol that they want to give a new potential
customer of theirs in the Far East. Can be we be a party to this type of
document?

Doug
---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 12/10/99 07:04 AM
---------------------------

Tony Maarraoui <AMK@Vitol.com> on 12/09/99 03:31:53 PM
To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: draft letter

December 10, 1999

Vitol S.A, Inc
Atn: Antonio Marraoui - Director of Latin American and Caribbean Trading
1100 Louisiana Suite 5500
Houston, Texas 77002

Doug, this is more or less the draft for the letter that i need. I would
like to get an original by tuesday of next week so i can send it. I
appreciate your help.

To whom it may concern,

This letter is to confirm that Vitol S.A, Inc has been a reliable supplier
of No. 2 Fuel Oil and No. 6 Fuel Oil under contract to Enron into Puerto
Plata, Dominican Republic since April, 1995. Currently, they supply
approximately 3600 Barrels/day of No. 2 fuel Oil, and 3500 Barrels/day of
No. 6 Fuel Oil.

Vitol S.A, Inc has performed well and has fulfilled all their contractual
obligations to date.

Please do not hesitate to call me if you need any additional information.

Best Regards,

Doug Leach
Project Director
713-853 5007


Thank you.  I will tell her.

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fogo, Georgia
Sent:	Tuesday, May 15, 2001 3:41 PM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	RE: Nursing Position

Tom, you may wish to tell Mary to get it to me as soon as possible.  Interviews begin tomorrow afternoon.

Thanks!
Georgia

From:	Thomas A Martin/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/15/2001 03:39 PM
To:	Georgia Fogo/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:	RE: Nursing Position

Sorry, I don't think I said her name;  it is Mary Martin.  I left a message for her so I bet you will be getting her resume in a day or so.

Thanks,

Tom

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fogo, Georgia
Sent:	Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:31 PM
To:	tmartin@enron.com
Subject:	Nursing Position

I forgot to ask your sister's name.  We'll look for her resume via fax: 713-646-2147.

Thanks!
Georgia


Kilmer stopped in to discuss where we are on the by Land portion of the
phases VI thru whatever study.  Crux of our discussion is that we need a
sit-down with you because our minds have blanked as to what Stan specifically
wanted.

I have run the numbers and I think I now have the cases on an apples and
apples basis.  To do this I had to actually go out thru Phase X,
extrapolating with Tom P's assistance.  I  thought I would have a little
writeup by this PM, but I am not going to make it. I did want to get this
note out so that we could get on your calendar.  In a nutshell, the levelized
rate for land ends up being about 10% or so higher than that for sea based on
our beliefs about the future market.  Build up faster and sea becomes more
favorable while land is unchanged.   At any rate, I'll try to get something
together in the AM, at least the graphs which I already have. (Tho I'm not
sure I can explain it on paper.)


Thank you for your request. You will be notified by email when your request has been processed. You can check the progress of your request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000065483&Page=MyReq.


Hi, thanks for the update.  Per was in Houston last week,  and I've asked him
to get with you soon.  Please call him (he should be expecting your call) at
our office in NY at.   212-702-3910.  Would you also like to come to houston
for a visit and interview?   Jeff

	Nathaniel Jeppson <Njeppson@ALLENCO.COM>
	02/02/2001 06:20 PM

		 To: "'Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com'" <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: follow-up

Jeff,
Quick update.  I called Jeff to see if is going to be in NY next week, his
sec. said that he's out of the office today and apparently not scheduled to
be in NY next week.  I am hoping that we will talk soon.  No call for Per
(sp?) in the NY office.  Hope you are well,
Nat

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 2:30 PM
To: Njeppson@ALLENCO.COM
Subject: RE: follow-up

I saw him this morn, and asked if he called you.  call him tomorrow or
thurs, and i'll follow up......

Nathaniel Jeppson <Njeppson@ALLENCO.COM> on 01/23/2001 11:35:26 AM

To:   "'Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com'" <Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: follow-up

Jeff,
Congratulations on yesterday's earnings release - the market reacted well.
Feedback I got from a large bank on the street is that they always
recommend
buying ENE in the weeks leading up to earings releases.  I don't want to be
a pain, but you had said to let you know if I had not heard from Jeff by
today.  I'm happy to be the one to make the call - just let me know.

Halley and Michael's opening was quite successfull and the show is great.
have fun in London.
Nat


T O D A Y    G O D    I S    F I R S T
Marketplace Meditations
by Os Hillman

Being an Overcomer

I have told you these things, so that in Me you may have peace.
In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have
overcome the world.
- (John 16:33)

"Why does it seem that those involved in Christian enterprise
find the way so hard? It seems as though it is harder for those
who are committed Christians in business. Have you found this to
be true?" This was the comment from a business associate
recently. My answer was a definite yes. In fact, if you were not
a Christian and sought to do a similar business without regard to
maintaining a biblical philosophy, the way would be much smoother
sailing. It makes us think of the prophet who asked, "Why do the
wicked prosper?" (see Jer. 12:1)

It is a spiritual principle of which we speak. When the
Israelites crossed the Jordan before they entered the Promised
Land, they fought only two battles. Then after they entered the
Promised Land, they fought 39 battles. The way of the cross is
not paved with lilies; it is paved with grace. When we seek to
honor God in our business life, we will be met with opposition
from the spiritual forces of this world. This is why each of us
must commit ourselves to walking in the power of the Holy Spirit
and to be as gentle as doves but as wise as serpents.

Do not be surprised when you find the way harder as a believer
than when you were a non-believer. You now have more at stake
among the spiritual forces that desire you to be defeated and
ineffective.

Stand firm against the evil forces that desire to keep you from
walking in freedom in the Promised Land. Jesus is your victory
for every battle you will encounter. Call on His name.

-----------
This daily devotional is published and distributed by
Crosswalk.com.  It is written by Os Hillman, president of
Marketplace Leaders, located in Atlanta, GA.  His email address
is <os@marketplaceleaders.org>.  For more articles and books
by Os Hillman you may visit his web site at
http://www.marketplaceleaders.org.

Additional devotionals are available from Crosswalk.com:
<http://devotionals.crosswalk.com>
-----------
To read the Current Feature Story from ReligionToday,
go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentFeatureStory/

For today's complete News Summary from ReligionToday,
go to http://religiontoday.crosswalk.com/CurrentNewsSummary/

-----------
For Copyright Terms go to http://www.crosswalk.com/info/copyright

____________________SUBSCRIPTION INFO_______________________

* You subscribed to Marketplace Meditations as:
< jeff.king@enron.com >
* To unsubscribe from this newsletter immediately, click here:
< http://link.crosswalk.com/UM/U.ASP?A3.12.261895 >
If that link is not clickable, simply copy and paste it into
your browser window.
* To change your address:  unsubscribe your old address
and then subscribe your new address.
* To subscribe, send an email to:
< SUBSCRIBE-marketplace@lists.crosswalk.com > or go to
< http://www.crosswalk.com/lists > for a complete list of
our newsletters.
* Copyright , 2001 Crosswalk.com, Inc. and its Content
Providers. All rights reserved.

____________________________________________________________


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Milnthorp, Rob
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Zufferli, John
Subject:	Strictly Confidential

John, please check with Louise as how to get the attached to her.


clearly, the meeting with Horton et al went well...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:24 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

"... who got my name from people."  I suppose it's better than if he got your name from, what ... a pack of wild dogs?  rooting pigs?  a herd of buffalo?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:37 AM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Conversation w/Jerry Hirsch of LA Times

FYI.  Hirsch apparently is a business reporter for the Times who got my name from people.  He's doing a story about the contracts.  Something like "they bought way too much for too high a price.  Now what?"  I told him that I would talk to him under the following conditions:

No attribution to Enron specifically
No attribution of the "unnamed sources" sort, "industry sources" or sort, etc.
If, when the story's further along, he wants to try to get a quote from us, I'd put him in touch with our PR folks.

We talked generally about DWR, the CA Power Authority, the contracts, the Edison deal with the PUC, etc.

More specifically, he asked me "are there any alternatives to deal with this mess."  I outlined the following proposal, which we've talked about internally, and which we've been quietly shopping behind the scenes.  I did not bring up the "green only" DA for small customers piece of the proposal (slipped my mind).

I also gave him names of other folks I thought he should talk to.  He said he might get back to me.  If he calls back, I'll let you know.

Please let me know if anyone has any concerns 1) about talking to him on a backgound only basis, and/or 2) the proposal outlined below. Thanks.

Best,
Jeff

**********************************************************************************************************
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:53 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan
Subject:

Rick:
Based on your voicemail, here's a quick-and-dirty synopsis of a proposal that I've been quietly discussing with a select few out here in California (e.g., John White, large customers).  It could include more bells and whistles, but the intent of this proposal is to get DA back as soon as possible.
**************************************************************************

Reduce DWR L-T contract volumes by at least 33-50%
To "back fill" increase in net-short created by contract reformation, permit noncore customers (20 KW and above) to elect to go DA to fill the position
DA provides a significantly more efficient hedge against price volatility than DWR contracts
Election is first-come, first-serve, capped at the aggregate net short position
Customers decision to go DA will constitute a 3-year commitment to stay DA (i.e., can't go back to IOU for 3 yrs; must stay in the market)
If a net short position remains after noncore customers have elected DA (i.e., not enough elect to fill the net short), then the IOUs will hold an auction to fill the net short
The auction would seek a portfolio of 3 month, 6 month, 1 year and 3 year deals (both peak and off-peak) to fill the net short.
Noncore customers choosing DA would not escape costs of DWR power consumed when the customer was receiving utility service (i.e., prior to electing DA)
Likewise, if the noncore customers choosing DA was a utility customer during the period when the utility accured its "undercollection," (i.e., when wholesale prices exceeded the retail cap), the customer would not escape those costs by virtue of electing DA status
Noncore customers would not bear responsibility for recovery of DWR L-T contracts.
Potential add-on to deal:  Core customers (less than 20 KW) could choose "green only" DA, but, like, noncore customers could not escape costs for which they are responsible.


re Sharon Davis v. NEPCO


Please note that Dec '01 from NF1164.B has been removed and rebooked to
NF1164.I.


Andy:
The problem if we limit the size on options to being what size is offered on
the swap hedge, we will not be able to offer adequate size on the options.
Optimally, I think we want to offer a minimum size of 100 across all
strikes.  If the swap is 4/4.5, one a day up, and someone buys half a day,
making the market, 4/4.5 one a day by half a day, the size offered on a 10
cent out of the money call might be as low as 30 contracts, a much smaller
size than most people want to trade.  If we restrict to strikes with a lower
delta, we face the problem of not offering enough strikes and not making a
market in options that have open EOL interest that have moved closer to the
money.
Maybe the answer is to assume the swap hedge to be a penny wide two way
wrapped around the EOL swap mid market.  Thus if the front swap on EOL is
4/4.5 one a day by half a day,  the input into the option calculator is
3.75/4.75, 100 up.  In this case I think 100 is necessary because once a
strike has open interest, we must continue to support it.  Thus I anticipate
having to make markets in deep itm options as the market moves.

In terms of straddle strikes, I think the edge received from buying straddles
struck on the EOL offer and vice-versa is not big enough to compensate for
what I think the industry will view as a scam and another way Enron is trying
to rip people off.  Although striking on the mid-market is probably easier
for the trader, I actually think striking in five cent increments makes more
sense.  It allows people to trade out of the position on EOL.  Whereas if
someone buys the 3085 straddle and the market moves to 3200, they have to
call ENE to close the trade.  If the trade is struck at 3100, we will have a
market on both the 3100 call and put at all times.  Secondly, I would
anticipate non-volatility driven option traders may elect to sell either just
the put or call in this scenario depending on their view of market direction.


Sorry about that, I was working on the Teco O&M costs.  Thanks
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000
10:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Christopher Smith on 03/17/2000 09:57 AM
To: Yvan Chaxel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald M- ECT
Origination Black/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: TECO

Please send me an excel spreadsheet which depicts the value that you see
associated with the heat rate spread option.  I want to make sure that I
understand exactly how you propose valuing the transaction and how this value
would be booked.  As such, please provide the following detail:

Will we be valuing/booking a series of monthly call options or a series of
daily call options?
What power curve are we valuing the deal against - PJM East or West Hub?
Please send me the current fuel curve that you are converting to $/MWh to
value the deal?
What volatilities are you using to value the options - monthly volatilities
or intra-day volatilities or a blend of the two (if blending please show me
what formula you using to blend the two vols)?
What expiration date are you using, i.e.: for monthly call options the 15th
of the relevant month, and for daily options?
What correlation are you assuming, 15% flat for twenty years?
Are you deducting all operating expenses from the value of the option?
Are you using the "SPRDOPT" Exotic Options function to value the option?
Are you using the $/MWh VOM dollar amount as your strike?
Has Don provided the fixed payment stream?  This stream should be covering
both P&I and not just principal.

Yvan, and Ben, please provide answers to these question via written
correspondence so that their is limited probability of misunderstanding.
Thank you both very much for your time and help thus far.  Furthermore, I
would like to reiterate that RAC's goal, prior to quoting any credit reserve,
is to be 100% confident that: (i) the methodology that is being employed is
consistent among the internal groups; and (ii) the inherent value of the
price risk management contracts matches.  This enables RAC to manage the
associated risk during the life of the transaction both effectively and
appropriately.

Regards,

Christopher


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Corporate Benefits@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:10 PM
To:	All Enron Employees United States Group@ENRON
Subject:	To: All Domestic Employees who Participate in the Enron Corp. Savings Plan

Mark your calendar--
	the Enron Corp. Savings Plan is moving to a new administrator!

In preparation, here are a few things you need to remember.

For All Savings Plan participants, Friday, October 19 at 3:00pm CST will be the last day to:
?	Request a loan or a loan payoff so that funds can be allocated or distributed in time.
?	Request a withdrawal (In-service or Hardship).

For SDA Participants, Friday, October 19 at 3:00pm CST will be your last day to:
?	Make trades in your Schwab SDA brokerage account so that we can move your holdings in-kind.
?	Re-invest any Schwab mutual funds into your choice of funds  - the default will be your money market fund.

Other transactions, such as Contribution Rate Changes and Investment Fund Transfers, will continue until 3:00pm CST on October 26.

EnronBenefits... keeping pace with your lifestyle.


Dynegydirect was experiencing technical difficulties that required it to be
temporarily unavailable.  However the problems have been resolved and
traders may go ahead and log back in to Dynegydirect.
We are sorry for any inconveniences this may have caused you.  If you have
any further questions please contact us at the number below.

DYNEGYdirect e- care
Customer Support
Dynegy, Inc.
Ph: (877) 396.3493   Fx: (877) 396.3492
Email: ecare@dynegydirect.com


Please help me congratulate Emily Butler on her conversion to full-time Enron
employment.  Emily is an Office Assistant and supports West Power Trading and
activities on the floor.

She came to us from an employment agency, and we are very pleased she decided
to continue her career at Enron.  Emily has worked in various office
environments and and is a great addition to our administrative staff.

Welcome aboard, Emily!


During the course of their investigation, Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation will be taking documents they believe may be important for their investigation from employees' offices.  The FBI has agreed to return copies of such documents.

In addition, should you have an immediate need for a document requested by the FBI, please make a copy of the specific document and give the original to the FBI. Thank you for your cooperation.


Call in #   Pass Code

1-800-713-8600 80435


Kelly

Unfortunately Enron moved me to Houston.  I will not be able to participate
in Enviros this year.

Regards

John Lavorato


Rent as many DVDs as you want for 20 bucks a month. Get a FREE TRIAL TODAY! When you rent from Netflix, you'll never pay a late fee again!

Click Here!
http://www.intervolved.net/i.htm?b=401000078&c=44a&i=25993194&a=10011

Netflix has the words largest selection of DVD titles - over 10,000! Free home delivery with prepaid return, and NO LATE FEES EVER.

It's easy to rent DVDs from Netflix!

PICK YOUR FLIX:
Choose your movies from our online selection of virtually every DVD movie ever published.

FREE HOME DELIVERY:
The movies you select arrive in your home mailbox via first-class mail in 2-4 days.

NO DUE DATES:
Keep each DVD as long as you want. Have up to 3 movies on hand. Watch them anytime.

PREPAID RETURNS:
Return used DVD in its prepaid envelope and get another
DVD.

Click Here:
http://www.intervolved.net/i.htm?b=401000078&c=44a&i=25993194&a=10011

PS: There are no commitments. You can cancel anytime.

AOL users:
 follow this link

******************************************

Click on the link below to opt out of Intervolved.net
http://www.intervolved.net/intervopt?code=opt-out&email=plucci@ect.enron.com

This message was sent to address: plucci@ect.enron.com
Do Not hit the reply button, your address will not be deleted. We respect all removal requests.

Please send any email abuse complaints to unsubscribe@intervolved.net

By continuing to receive emails from Intervolved.net you agree to Intervolved.net's Privacy Policy which can be viewed at:
http://www.intervolved.net/privacy.html

This message is not intended for residents in the States of WA, NV, CA & VA.

Copyright? 2001 by Intervolved, Inc.  All rights reserved. This message sent by Intervolved.net

OfferID=JLNHNML61201568


Hi,

  Following the e-mail you have received yesterday concerning
the new WTI bullet swap contracts, we would like to summarize what we have
done on the ICE system yesterday evening:

  -Deleted WTI monthly time spreads
  -Deleted WTI/Brent monthly diff spreads (spread with
legging)
  -Deleted 1% NYH Harbor Fuel Oil Crack monthly (spread with
legging)

  -Added WTI/Brent monthly diff spreads (spread with NO
legging)
  -Added 1% NYH Harbor Fuel Oil Crack monthly (spread with NO
legging)

 Unfortunately the WTI/Brent and the 1% NYH Fuel Oil Crack contracts
(with the legging functionality) have been removed from your portfolios. You
will need to add  the first four nearby months' contracts to your
portfolios by going to Admin / Manage Portfolios / Edit your portfolio....

 Please do not hesitate to contact us is you have any question:
 Helpdesk on +1 770 738 2101 (US)
 Stephanie Trabia: +44 207 484 5546 (UK)

 Regards,

 Stephanie Trabia
 Marketing Manager
 IntercontinentalExchange
 Tel +44 207 484 5546
 Fax +44 207 484 5100
 Mob +44 77 33 261 268
 stephanie.trabia@intcx.com


I haven't looked at this yet, but I wanted to get it to you. I'll send the
terms and conditions separately.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 05:33
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 12/06/2000 05:30:01 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: Exhibits to the CA Energy Development Agreements

  Attached please find clean and blackline versions of the exhibits to
the CA Energy Development Agreements.

To complete the exhibits, we need to include the following:

1. Exhibits B-1, H-2 and R need to be added.

2. Do we need to add language to section B of Exhibit A-1 because
these are dual fuel turbines?

3. Should the scope be changed in Exhibit B because these are dual
fuel turbines?

4. In Section 3.1 of Exhibit K, the terms "Specific Date" and
"Recovery Schedule" are not defined.

5. For Exhibit T, please confirm that Enron has received all of the
documents that it should have received by now.

6.  If required, we need to have a Seller Parent Guaranty for
Exhibit C-1.
 <<Exhibits to CA Development Turbine Agreement.DOC>>  <<Exhibits to CA
Energy Break-Out Agreements.DOC>>
 - Exhibits to CA Development Turbine Agreement.DOC
 - Exhibits to CA Energy Break-Out Agreements.DOC


Max brought to my attention the fact that some of  you are not receiving the
weekly report. I am sending you the report from the  last two weeks, along
with an analysis of the elections, and starting Monday you  will receive it
directly on a regular basis.
?
Thank you and I apologize for the inconvenience.
 - Weekly1.doc
 - Weekly2.doc
 - Fox.doc


Hare is correct...how about "cold as a witch's tit". What the hell is that? Someone said that last night at the rodeo and I'm still trying to figure that one out. Heard it many times before, but like you, have never thought to "overthink" such a quote. I'm very confused and getting angrier by the minute...

-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:20 PM
To: Brian Constantine; Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com
Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS

isn't it hide nor "hare"?  I really don't know, and can't make sense out of
it all. I've been paying attention to phrases lately that just don't make
sense.  Like chocolate thunderbolt, baby.  It's a stretch to make it work,
but oh so fitting for the setting.

Do you know what I want?

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:13 PM
To: Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net;
Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com
Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS

Chet...is that a proper RSVP? Can't make hide nor hair outta that. Are you
IN? or not? C'mon dude, make it happen...

-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:10 PM
To: Brian Constantine; Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com;
c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com
Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS

Man, now I'm upset.  My "buddy" up here said he'd get a group of his "team"
together for that night as well.  After a few margaritas, it won't really
matter what happens. C'mon, man. What?

I'll bring my pickle packets.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Fenner, Chet; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; c.r.zander@att.net;
Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com
Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS

Make it happen, Chetuck. BTW...whatever happened to your reply about our
impending "foursome"??? Very "excited"  about the opportunity...

OK...this is the final and definitive MAN NIGHT agenda...it WILL NOT CHANGE,
heretofore.

Where?- Tampico Mexican Seafood.  610 to Airline...Right on Airline, Go
about 4 blocks, you will pass the Farmers Market and just past that will be
Tampico. Queried Zander again about it this morning and he said they DO have
security and the clientele is an eclectic mix of Mexican day laborers
drinking Mexican beer and those little packets of salt and lime, dining next
to large tables of rich blue-blood yuppie types...Good Fun. Kind of like a
good noodle house or other oriental type place...if you see the natives
eating there, you know it's good. Besides after listening to Joe and Chet, I
would agree that Tony's is ABSOLUTELY OUT OF THE QUESTION.

When?- Thursday 2/28- 7:15 pm.

Who?- Head count is as follows...Piggy, Lease Nazi, Captain Safety,
Monkey-Noise Boy, Big Boy Chambers (?), Fenner-Weiner(?)

MEN...please RSVP such that we can appropriately "sign" to the non-English
speaking staff how many Ritas we need to order upon arrival.

See you MEN at the MAN function, to do MAN-typical things.

								PIGGY

-----Original Message-----
From: Fenner, Chet [mailto:Chet_Fenner@bmc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:28 AM
To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; Fenner, Chet;
c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com
Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS

Eat me, Wollam.  Did you notice the "Out of Office" message from my email,
home slice?

Not sure what the 20 "MAN NIGHT" emails are in my inbox from yesterday, but
noted the Thurs. night dinner.  I have conflict which I will try to unwind
for my attendance.  However, not sure that we want to be at Tony's on such
night, based on what my co-worker says!

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Brian Constantine; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com;
c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com
Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS

I hear back from John more than I do Chet.
Chad and I are going for noodles in a few minutes. Joe do you want to join
us?

Brian, your in charge of the REVISED FINAL PLAN FOR MAN NIGHT. good luck.
I'll go where I'm told. e.

>From: "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com>
>To: "Erik Wollam" <erwollam@hotmail.com>, <knipe3@msn.com>,
><chet_fenner@bmc.com>, <c.r.zander@att.net>, <Joe.Parks@enron.com>,
><john.chambers@bisys.com>
>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:30:13 -0600
>
>Where is Chad?? Chet??? Does Chambers ever respond to anything...who is he,

>for that matter? For the love of God...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:27 AM
>To: knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net;
>Joe.Parks@enron.com; john.chambers@bisys.com; Brian Constantine
>Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
>
>NO< NO< NO... this is now going to get way to confusing. WHo is going
>anyway, just me and you Brian?
>
>You need to make your pick and send out a REVISED FINAL PLAN after hearing
>from everyone.
>
>
> >From: "Brian Constantine" <brianc@saltgrass.com>
> >To: "Parks, Joe" <Joe.Parks@ENRON.com>, "Erik Wollam"
> ><erwollam@hotmail.com>, "Fenner, Chet" <Chet_Fenner@bmc.com>,
> ><knipe3@msn.com>
> >Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
> >Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:22:34 -0600
> >
> >According to E, that is indeed the case. I will roll the dice and go to
> >Tampico (leave any valuables locked securely in your glove box). Set
>alarm.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
> >Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:15 AM
> >To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com
> >Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
> >
> >yes, according to chet's co-worker
> >	-----Original Message-----
> >	From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
> >	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:14 AM
> >	To: Parks, Joe; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com
> >	Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
> >	Is Thursday night, "Man Night" for "those kinds of men" too???
> >
> >	-----Original Message-----
> >	From: Parks, Joe [mailto:Joe.Parks@ENRON.com]
> >	Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:09 AM
> >	To: Brian Constantine; Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com
> >	Subject: RE: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
> >
> >	so your proposing we are going to the stabbing cabin. go to tampico
> >		-----Original Message-----
> >		From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
> >		Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:08 AM
> >		To: Erik Wollam; Fenner, Chet; knipe3@msn.com; Parks, Joe
> >		Subject: MAN NIGHT FINAL PLANS
> >
> >		Men,
> >
> >		            The final descision on the night of men will be
as
>follows...
> >
> >		Where: Tony's Mexican (bring your own clown and accessories,
please)
> >
> >		When: Thursday 2/28 at 7:15 pm.
> >
> >		We will wait until Zander is able to attend, to try the
Tampico place.
> >Would rather go w/ someone who knows the drill.
> >
> >		I am very much looking forward to seeing all of you men.
> >
> >
> >                Pig-N-a-Stinky-blanket
> >
> >
> >
**********************************************************************
> >	This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
affiliate
> >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
>by
> >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> >reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
>delete
> >all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
>not
> >intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
>a
> >binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> >affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
> >relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
> >Thank you.
> >
**********************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
>http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


Abijeet,

The balance of month Gas Daily product is called Kern Opal, but all basis and indexes are settled on the NWPL Rocky Mountains product.  These should be used for the plasma screen accordingly.

Mat


Updates
Jennifer Burns - new cell phone number
Kathy McMahon - new executive committee assistant


Tim:  I've worked hard with these guys to try to make this conference the
best that it could be, but it ain't quite there.  So I'd rather keep our
powder dry and use Skilling at another time.  Not top-shelf enough in my
view.  If you want to discuss further let me know.

Also, one question:

Is the BEEP stack the constrained supply curve post-adjustment bids?  I have
that right?


Have a nice night.


Hi Jeff, thanks for the opportunity to talk to your group.  FYI, I recently talked to Vince Kaminiski (my former boss) while seeking advice on a career move that I feel I must make soon.  Vince suggested that I talk to John Lavorato directly to explore opportunities in gas and electricity trading as well as crude. As a result, I have sent my information directly to John as well. Currently, my discussions are predominantly with the crude desk via Bill White.

Here is quick background of my education and experience (detailed resume attached) to provide a basis for my with your group next couple of days.

I am currently a director of trading at EBS responsible for the data storage desk.  I work in Paul Racicot's organization within EBS.  I am looking to expand my quantitative and commercial skills into core franchise of Enron businesses and would appreciate an opportunity to talk to you regarding a position in the gas trading business.

Education:

B.Sc., M.Sc., (nuclear engineering, engineering science), university of Toronto
CFA, Chartered Financial Analyst charter holder

Experience:

Ontario Hydro, Nuclear design Engineering			1989-1993
General Electric, Advance Nuclear Design			1993-1994
Tenera Energy, Software engineering, safety analysis		1994-1997
Deloitte & Touche, Capital markets--risk management, NYC	1997-1998

	Enron

Enron NA, Research Group					1998-2000
Enron Broadband Services, Trading				2000-present

References:

Vince Kaminski
Bill White
Greg Woulfe
Paul Racicot (If possible, I would like to keep the discussions confidential until final decision to use Paul's reference).

Ravi Thuraisingham, CFA
Director, Storage Trading
Enron Broadband Services
p  713.853.3057
c  713.516.5440
pg 877.680.4806
ravi.thuraisingham@enron.com


I hope it is not Woody, Vandy sucked at offense and defense.  He is horrible and I would hope we would go after somebody else.  We need to get someone in there soon so they can put the offense/defense in and the players can start studying it to get a head start on next year.  I am afraid if Tubby doesn't turn it around next year he may be gone.

I got a digital camera for Christmas that works real well, I will get some pictures to you.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"James Love" <James.Love@msl.redstone.army.mil>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 9:13 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	Re: sorry it took so long to send you my address

To read the articles about Auburn, Tubberville says HE made the decision
they should go.  Yeah, right!  I'm sure he was told by Lowder that
either they went or he did.  So, they were given the opportunity to
resign, and both chose to do so.  There's already 3 or 4 candidates to
replace each.  They expect to have the offensive guy in the next 2
weeks.  Maybe a little longer for the defense.  Only remember 1 name:
Woody Weidenhofer from Vandy for offense.  Can't say that I've ever
heard of the others.

Oh well, we'll see how it all pans out.

Thanks for the address.  I'll send the picture soon.

Pop

>>> "Love, Phillip M." <Phillip.M.Love@ENRON.com> 01/03/02 04:37PM >>>
sorry Pop, I forgot to send this to you.  My home email is
plove@houston.rr.com.  Talk to you this weekend.  I heard Auburn got
rid of Off and Def coordinator.  We will see if that changes anything.
PL

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the
sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact
the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be
an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and
the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by
anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Is there a reason why you think you are Batman?


this one looks nice - although slightly expensive.  maybe we can go see it

L,
e

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 02/11/2001 06:17:16 PM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Welcome to www.har.com! (4)

?
?http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?MLNUM=516080
 - Welcome to www.har.com! (4).url


I have been meaning to email you all day.  I  have been extremely busy as
wel.  I am sorry to hear that.  Ashley and I were looking forward to going
out to dinner with you guys on Saturday.  Maybe we will call your folks and
see if they would like to go out for your dad's bday.  I will have to give
him a call tomorrow to wish him happy birthday.  Do you have his number at
work or an email at work?  Thanks.

We look forward to seeing you soon.  Take care.
PL


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/14/2001 11:37
AM ---------------------------

TJ Butler
03/14/2001 11:36 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: kayak

Yes, I do still have it.  It is located close to the Southwest Freeway(59
South) and Weslayan.

tjb
x54698


I have created deal 223865 (zero volumes) to cover this name change.

D

	From:  Sherlyn Schumack                           03/22/2000 10:33 AM

To: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter # 0989814 - GMT, Inc. - 1/00 production

Stephanie,

The problem with the January payment is that the deal is set up incorrectly
in sitara.   For January production deal 153864 shows HPLC purchasing gas
from GMT Company Inc, not GMT Inc.  Someone needs to either correct the deal
for 1/00 or put in a new deal, then I can do an accounting arrangement to
make the necessary correction.    It is correct for 2/00 on deal 156292.  I
emailed Daren on this because I see his name in sitara as the contact, but I
am not sure who actually takes care of it.

---------------------- Forwarded by Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000
10:27 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Thu Nguyen                           03/20/2000 03:07 PM

To: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter # 0989814 - GMT, Inc. - 1/00 production

Sherlyn,

 I believe this is your meter........
---------------------- Forwarded by Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000 03:05 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Stephanie Gomes                           03/18/2000 09:21 AM

To: Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter # 0989814 - GMT, Inc. - 1/00 production

Thu,
I'm not sure if this is your meter or not.  If it is not, could you please
pass this email on to the correct person.
For meter # 9814, Jan. 2000 production, the volume was allocated to the wrong
company.  The gas was allocated to GMT Company Inc., but it should have been
allocated to GMT, Inc.  For Feb. 2000 it is done correctly.
I need to recoup the money from GMT Company, so could you please let me know
when the change has been made in the system.
Thanks for your help.

Stephanie ( 3-6004 )

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT on 03/18/2000
09:09 AM ---------------------------

Nick Moshou@ENRON
03/15/2000 03:25 PM
To: Stephanie Gomes/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1

Here you go let me know if you need anything else.
---------------------- Forwarded by Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron on 03/15/2000
03:22 PM ---------------------------

	From:  George Weissman @ ECT                           03/06/2000 10:34 AM

To: Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1

Would you please send a note to Brian Riley verifying that the GMT payment
has gone out to the Houston company? Please include the amount.

George x3-6992
---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2000
10:20 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           03/03/2000 04:18 PM

To: Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1

Nick, it appears that we paid GMT Company, Inc. (BA 01474) of Corpus Christi
instead of GMT, Inc. (BA 75046) of Houston.  These companies are not
related.  We should pay the Houston GMT for production at meter 098-9814.
Would you please make the necessary adjustments?  Thanks.

George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------

Nick Moshou@ENRON
03/03/2000 03:00 PM
To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1

I was looking in Unify for last month and this invoice was finalled under the
GMT Company Inc for 15975 mmbtu at meter 0989814.  The check was sent to
their Corpus Christi address.  The Sitara# was 153864.  The Sitara # you gave
me is showing February as the beginning month with GMT, Inc. as the payee.
Do you know if these are different companies?
---------------------- Forwarded by Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron on 03/03/2000
02:25 PM ---------------------------

Cynthia Hakemack@ECT
03/02/2000 04:07 PM
To: Nick Moshou/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1

Nick, Can you please handle this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           03/02/2000 02:21 PM

To: Cynthia Hakemack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1

Cindy, GMT has advised Brian that they have not yet received payment for
production at meter 098-9814 for the period from 1/14/2000 to 1/31/2000.
Would you look into this and have them paid as promptly as possible?  It
appears that the January deal was 156292 and I believe GMT produced 15,984
Mmbtu in January.

George x3-6992
---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000
02:16 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           01/13/2000 09:11 AM

To: Vicente Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron
cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert D Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1

Vic, attached is a Physical Well Connect form authorizing you to turn-on the
GMT Tillison #1 well.  We expect this production to commence either late
today or tomorrow at Meter 098-9814.

Nathan, WO C59605 on its way to you.

George x3-6992

---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 01/13/2000
09:01 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  George Weissman                           01/13/2000 07:45 AM

To: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert D Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicente Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1

Brian, for your information.  Please note Robert's cautionary warning with
respect to additional wells that GMT may want to drill and add to this
meter.  Does GMT have additional drilling plans?  If so, should we alert them
to the gas quality issue early on?

George x3-6992
---------------------- Forwarded by George Weissman/HOU/ECT on 01/13/2000
07:41 AM ---------------------------

Robert D Morgan
01/12/2000 10:04 AM
To: George Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: GMT, Inc. Tillison #1

Although the gas is non-spec, the volumes and gas total inerts are low enough
that it can be blended okay before reaching Beaumont.  GO FOR IT.

As a precaution, we are starting a trend and I want to be very cautious.
Once we connect a well, we can't go backwards.  Please be specific with GMT
and limit him to this one well.  Otherwise he could drill more wells and flow
them ALL through this new meter.


Do you code or approve invoices for goods and services that are processed by the Houston-based Accounts Payable center?
If yes, please read and respond to this e-mail.

On May 1st, iBuyit Payables will be activated for all organizations supported by the Houston-based Accounts Payable processing center (for example, invoices submitted via AP drop box to 600 Jefferson, Houston).  If you code or approve these invoices, the iBuyit Payables project team has important information to share with you about the iBuyit Payables system, training, and the May 1st transition to the new system.

To identify yourself as a future iBuyit Payables Coder or Approver, please respond to this e-mail upon receipt with the following information:
*  Full Name (First, Middle, Last)
*  E-mail address
*  Business unit (For example, Corporate, ETS, EWS, EES, or EBS)
*  Do you code invoices? (Yes/No)
*  Do you approve invoices? (Yes/No)
*  Are you a remote user? For example, do you dialup to access the Enron network? (Yes/No)

This will ensure that you receive important iBuyit Payables information.  Thank you for your response!

Attached is important iBuyit Payables training information:

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Hi Liz -

You e-mail worked perfectly.  I was going into the board meeting when it was
received, so sorry I didn't respond.  Your Dad hasn't seen your message yet,
but hopefully he can call this afternoon.  I hope that works for you.  He is
leaving early this afternoon as he and Linda have an appointment at 4:30.

Rosie

Elizabeth Lay <lizard_ar@yahoo.com> on 02/08/2000 08:09:32 AM
To: Ken Lay <klay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Phone Call

Dad,
I need to talk to you about the contract I am drafting
and wanted to know a good time to call. Can you please
let me know when we can schedule a call. It should
only take about 15 minutes.
Thanks
Elizabeth
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
09:27 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Corporate Benefits @ ENRON                           11/15/2000 09:09
PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Employees United States
cc:
Subject: Open Enrollment 2001 Deadline Extension

OPEN ENROLLMENT 2001 DEADLINE EXTENDED

Due to a very heavy, last minute influx of employees trying to make elections
and/or changes to their 2001 benefits, the open enrollment 2001 deadline has
been extended until 5pm Central Time on Friday, November 17th.

Please continue to access the web at www.enron.benefitsnow.com or the IVR at
1-800-425-5864.

You must have your 2001 open enrollment personal worksheet that contains your
personal identification number (PIN - located in the upper right hand corner
of your worksheet) in order to access the web or IVR.


Benjamin,

Attached please find Caledonia's 3rd Quarter 1999 EDR files.

Regards,
-Pat


Before you send out the next draft we need to talk briefly.


This  set  includes a  new    commercial/industrial   electricity  cost
savings  slide  at the  end;
 I am  working on the    slide on electric  price volatility
and will  send it  early this afternoon..Marg

---------------------- Forwarded by Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron on 08/21/2000
10:45 AM ---------------------------
From: Simon Shih on 08/21/2000 09:43 AM
To: Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:


Richard:

Do you think you could give me a quick call at your convenience regarding the
foregoing?  As you know, a number of companies received subpoenas in the
California PUC investigation last week.  A few of our lawyers received
inquiries late last week from a couple of those companies, most of which own
CA situs generation plants, about possibly representing them in that
investigation.  I informed my partners that we had met on this subject with
ENA first and I told them to "stall" if at all possible for a few days since
I wanted LeBoeuf to be available to assist ENA if the opportunity was
presented to us.  I think you had said you were meeting with Jim and Mark
last Wednesday to discuss which outside firm you would use and I was not sure
whether a decision on that front had been reached.  Could you let me know if
you have decided on another counsel to represent ENA so that I could inform
my partners that they can go ahead and respond to some of the inquiries they
have received.  Obviously, we would continue to like to work with ENA on this
investigation, but we fully understand if you have decided to go with another
counsel.  As you can appreciate, many of the companies involved are anxious
to get outside counsel on board quickly, so if you could just let me know
what the status may be on your front that would be tremendously helpful to
us.  Thanks very much for your time and consideration in this regard.  I'm
sorry we were not able to hook up in NYC last week, but hopefully we will be
able to do that in the near future.  Thanks again.  John

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com


Your example is correct.

Lindy Donoho
12/06/2000 11:19 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW

I think the example of when quantities may be subject to transportation and
fuel is when an Operator overpulls at a delivery point and then cashes out
the imbalance, TW could be out the transport and fuel.  For example,

  DP is SoCal/Needles: scheduled volume is 700,000/d
     actual volume delivered is 720,000/d
     imbalance is 20,000/d, SoCal owes TW
     TW collects transport & fuel on 700,000/d (bill on scheduled volume)
     SoCal cuts a check to TW for dollar value of 20,000/d
     TW doesn't collect transport & fuel on 20,000/d
  Payback in-kind doesn't have this problem:
     The 20,000/d transport gets scheduled at Needles, TW collects the
transport & fuel      (bill on scheduled volume), but we physically give
SoCal 20,000/d less on that day

Is this the correct example?  I'm copying Lynn Blair to verify.

Susan Scott
12/06/2000 09:20 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy
Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW

We did not answer protests to our Order 637 filing.

The gist of PNM's protest in RP00-626 is that we shouldn't be able to charge
a transport or fuel fee for our imbalance netting and trading service.  I
agree with PNM that our tariff language is vague in this regard.  What
exactly do we mean by "no additional cost...unless through the allocation
process, quantities may be subject to transportation and fuel"??   Can
someone help me with this?

Since we really did not want to make this compliance filing anyway, I would
say we probably wouldn't mind if FERC rejected our tariff sheet outright.
However, it's more likely that they will just instruct us to clarify our
language.  Or they could tell us to remove the "subject to transportation and
fuel" provision.  If we want to preserve our right to charge transport and
fuel, it might be worthwhile filing something in the way of an answer.
However, I am going to need some assistance in understanding what the
language means and why we think we can do it, so I can justify it to FERC.
Any comments you have in this regard would be appreicated.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/05/2000 05:18 PM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: TW

Should we respond to PNM's protest of the dollar valuation of imbalances
prior to netting and trading?  Did we already respond to this issue when they
filed their protest of the 637 filing?  DF


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000
01:24 PM ---------------------------

Stephane Brodeur
03/16/2000 07:06 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Maps

As requested by John, here's the map and the forecast...
Call me if you have any questions (403) 974-6756.


Attached are ClickPaper approvals for November 6, 2000.


[IMAGE]

    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]Explore  more savings .....    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]Learn  more .....

  Search  Amazon.com for:

 We hope you  enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future  e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit the Help page  Updating  Subscriptions and Communication Preferences  and click the Customer  Communication Preferences link.   Please note  that this e-mail was sent to the following address:  jsteffe@enron.com

[IMAGE]


Are you aware of this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/01/2000 07:49
AM ---------------------------

Sanjay Bhatnagar@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/01/2000 12:23 AM
To: Steven J Kean@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Arbitration with Reliance and ONGC

---------------------- Forwarded by Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
08/01/2000 12:23 AM ---------------------------

Delivery Failure Report
Your document:	Re: Arbitration with Reliance and ONGC
was not delivered to:	steven kean
because:	User steven kean not listed in public Name & Address Book

What should you do?
You can resend the undeliverable document to the recipients listed above by
choosing the Resend button or the Resend command on the Actions menu.
Once you have resent the document you may delete this Delivery Failure Report.
If resending the document is not successful you will receive a new failure
report
Unless you receive other Delivery Failure Reports, the document was
successfully delivered to all other recipients.

EI-NINET01/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, EI-NINET01/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
EDC_NMAIL01/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

________________________

To: Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob Walls, steven
kean, Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jimmy
Mogal/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
From: Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Date: 08/01/2000 12:08:55 AM
Subject: Re: Arbitration with Reliance and ONGC

Jeff:

This is all Ok after the fact but I would have expected that we would have
discussed this before action was taken.

For the record, I would not advise calling this an arbitration BUT mediation
and I would work with senior government officials and politicians ahead of
time to control the fall out that may come about especially since Parliament
is in session right now.

I will advise our PR group to say nothing to the press but route all queries
to you.

sanjay

Jeffrey Sherrick@ENRON
07/31/2000 06:19 AM
To: John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry
Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike Stewart/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael J
Smalling/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wallace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick Phillips/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron, James Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Joseph W Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Pam
Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Arbitration with Reliance and ONGC

I was in India last week meeting with partners and we all agreed that the
best thing to do to move ahead regarding the old unrecovered cash calls
("joint interest billings") was to file an arbitration proceeding and get an
objective  third party to settle the issue.  As you know, Reliance and ONGC
owe EOGIL approximately  $7.1 and $10.3 million, respectively (including
interest on non-payment).  The arbitration notices reflected only the
non-payment numbers which are $5.8 and $7.3 million for RIL and ONGC
respectively.   We finalized the drafting and dated the notices on July 29th
and we delivered the official notice during business hours Monday July 31,
2000.  This was the final step in a very long effort to resolve this issue in
other means, but as I noted to the OOC after the June meetings this was the
only solution in the end.   While nobody likes to file arbitration, the good
news is in the end all parties seen this as the only solution and as best as
I can tell, at least internally ONGC and Reliance support this decision.  If
the issue gets external, I don't know how any of the parties will respond.
Our goal is to keep it as low keyed as possible, but this is India and I
would expect someone to try to make a big issue out of it.

I will be in contact with John Ambler today to discuss the details of the
submittal and to prepare for any response to the media that may be
necessary.  While both parties were expecting the notice, it may leak into
the media over the next few days.  Please defer any questions or comments to
either John Ambler, Larry Morse or myself regarding this issue.  Until John
advises us otherwise, our comment will be as follows;

" The parties (ONGC, Reliance and Enron Oil and Gas India Limited) have had a
dispute on certain cost items and together we have agreed it is best for the
joint venture to have this dispute resolved by an independent third party
using the guidelines as set forth in the Joint Operating Agreement."

Mike Smalling in our office will coordinate this matter with John Ambler and
the appropriate staff.   I will be available to respond if necessary and my
contact numbers are as follows;

office-713-853-5934
pager 888-493-1770
cell 713-569-4713
home 281-320-2198

Larry, please make sure our office understands that only you are to comment
on this and any other official E&P business in India and Wade/Sanjay would
you share this note with the appropriate people in your office so nobody is
surprised if something comes up.  Mike Smalling, John and/or I will keep you
informed of any  relevant events.

jeff


The New Desktop Solution For Discovering Your Family Tree.

Dear friend,

GENEALOGY DETECTIVE 2001 - The Number 1 Rated Family Research Software.

With this easy to use software, discovering your family tree on the internet becomes an enjoyable pastime, not an endless, frustrating hunt. Now more than ever, families are coming closer together through assisted use of the web.

"Genealogy Detective focuses strictly on genealogy sites and is therefore quite useful to anyone interested in their family tree."  Dick Eastman, Ancestry.com Newsletter, March 15, 2000.

Click here for instant download!

You received this email because you signed up at one of OptinGlobal's websites or you signed up with a party that has contracted with OptinGlobal. To unsubscribe from the OptinGlobal list, visit http://unsubscribe.optinglobal.com/?e=jwillia@enron.com.


Just let me know when you get bored...


10:00  Sat


This morning I received a copy of service of process that was served on Cogen
Technologies Linden Venture in the Roger Atkinson matter.  Cogen Technologies
Linden Venture had previously been served with a summons and complaint in the
Atkinson matter in mid April.  I forwarded the matter to El Paso Energy
Company, who had purchased ENA's interest in the Cogen companies effective
late February 2001.  El Paso retained Ed Fanning of McCarter & English to
represent Cogen's interests.  We have worked with Ed in other Cogen matters
before, and I have found him to be both effective and efficient.  This matter
relates to personal injuries allegedly suffered by Atkinson while working at
a construction site at the Linden facility in December 2000.  David Waterson
of El Paso recently called me concerning potential defense and indemnity
obligations that El Paso believes NEPCO may owe Cogen with respect to this
incident.  We will need to review NEPCO's contract with Cogen to determine if
any such obligations exist.

The document that I received today is a Notice of Motion to Consolidate and
to Compel Inspection.  This motion seeks to consolidate the Atkinson v. Cogen
case with a case that was apparently also filed in New Jersey state court as
Roger Atkinson v. JEDI Linden and NEPCO and to compel an inspection of the
construction site where the accident allegedly occurred.  I have asked Becky
Stephens whether we have received service of process on either JEDI Linden or
NEPCO.  To date, we have not.  However, I expect that service of process is
in the works, and I have asked Becky to be on the look out for it.  As this
new suit also apparently concerns personal injury claims, I am forwarding a
copy to both Rob and Bob, so that you can begin to process and investigate
the claim in your usual manner.

Please let me know if there is any other information you need in order to
begin our review for potential defense/indemnity to Cogen.  Thanks.

Bonnie J. White
Enron Litigation Unit
1400 Smith Street, Suite 4824
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  713-853-7244
Fax: 713-853-6576
bonnie.white@enron.com


I am trying to find out if anybody knows anything about USI Corporation.
They are a rate hawk out of San Juan Capistrano, CA. (So Cal).

They have approached Albertsons, who we are currently working with, about
entering into an agreement with them.  They are promising a 15 - 20% savings
($4-5MM) for their stores in SDG&E territory, just by putting them on another
applicable utility rate that nobody is aware of  "loop hole".  Of course,
they will not share this information until Albertsons has signed a contract.

The contacts we have been negotiating with have told them to get lost but USI
went over their heads to senior management who is now asking for an
explanation.

From a commodity origination and account management perspective a rate hawk,
if hired, is just going to cause problems.

Any information that anybody can provide on:

1.  The Company
2.  There pitch in CA
3.  More specifically, their possible "loop hole or play" in SDG&E territory,
would me much appreciated.

Please forward this message to anybody that might be able to help.

Is there an SDG&E interuptible tariff or a new ISO interuptible tariff that
can generate this kind of savings?

Thanks,

George Waidelich
NES - West
925-543-3801


gngr
713-853-7751


Jim is available at 10:00 pacific time.  Does that work for others?  Jim -
Ron suggests having Carl Imparato on the call because of his extensive
knowledge of California markets.  What do you think? If you were looking for
an attached list, I haven't prepared it yet.

James D Steffes@EES
09/14/2000 09:42 AM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Conference call re Tim's top 5

9am Central time is bad for me.  I could do it at 8am Central or 12noon
Central.  Don't hold off for me.

Jim

Mary Hain@ECT
09/14/2000 11:32 AM
To: jdasovic@ees.enron.com, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona Petrochko, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Bernadette Hawkins, Joseph Alamo, carrrn@bracepatt.com,
seabron.adamson@frontiereconomics.com
Subject: Conference call re Tim's top 5

I'd like to have a conference call tommorrow at 9:00 a.m. to review Tim's
"top 5" priorities to fix the wholesale market in California.  I need to do
this tomorrow so Seabron and Ron can write our pleading for the Section 206
proceeding while I'm on vacation next week.  Please let me know ASAP if 9:00
is a bad time or if you don't want to be on the call.


my polling location is the knights of columbus hall.

what exactly is a knight of columbus?


Samual, Jeff will be happy to take a photo for the Encounter.  Just let me
know the details so we can make sure he's where he needs to be at the
appointed time.

Good luck with the ride.

Sherri
x3-5984

	From:  Samuel Pak                           03/24/2000 02:39 PM

To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: MS150 and Associate/Analyst Picture for Encounter

Mr. Skilling,

Hello, my name is Samuel Pak and I am an Analyst in the A/A program.  There
will be approx. 15-20 of us from the A/A program participating in the MS 150
with you.  As a result, the Encounter has asked me to cover this event for
our up coming next issue.  As with any great story, we need a picture!  So
therefore, I would like to request a moment of your time after we take our
Enron Dream Team photo prior to the start of the ride.  I have spoke with
Amelia Alder and Deborah Gebhardt, and they are willing to accommodate us
after the group photo.  So how about a photo?

Look forward to meeting you.  Good luck!  I know I will need it.

Regards,
Samuel Pak
Global Exploration and Production
x37782


Thought you might want to see pictures of Derek's little boy. He is darling !!

----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000 12:55 PM -----

	Derek Davies
	07/13/2000 12:07 PM

		 To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Pictures of Evan Davies

---------------------- Forwarded by Derek Davies/CAL/ECT on 07/13/2000 11:06
AM ---------------------------

"Derek J Davies" <djdavies@cadvision.com> on 05/18/2000 09:27:00 AM
To: Derek Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Pictures of Evan

 - att1.htm
 - 05cc3104.jpg
 - 05cc3106.jpg
 - 05cc3108.jpg


Thanks for keeping me up to date. Out of curiosity, do you know why El Paso
changed the trade date in the first place?

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   12/20/2000 01:45 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Trade date for deal 475585.01

Kate,
just fyi, El Paso struck thru our 12/6/00 trade date and placed 12/5/00.  I
spoke to Chi, of El Paso and he said the 12/6/00 was okay.  I just made a
note on the confirm and sending it to the fileroom to be executed.
Thanks
Stephanie


Announcement for E220-1: Corporate Financial Reporting:

Greetings,
I came across an article that is pertinent to our discussion of auditor
independence.

Source: Wall Street Journal
Date: Friday, August 25, 2000
Page: C1
Title: SEC Probes Andersen for Conflict of Interest

Kindly,
Salvador


Ross/Jackie,

Here's my list of comments to the most recent draft.  It is subject to
internal review, but this gives you an idea.  Could we have a telephone
conference to knock out as many of these as possible?

Thanks,

Kay


Stacy,  Bill Moore from Texaco called and the well at meter 9826 which came
on at the beginning of the month at 2,000 a day  has dropped of to 1,200 a
day.   Bill would like to change the nom to 900 so we balance for the month.
Let me know what you think and I'll get back with him.


I will try and get my dad to take the appraiser into a couple of units.  Let
me know the day and time.

Phillip


Stan:

I have not talked directly with Coastal about their specific approach, but am
aware of efforts to find tax relief for conversion of MTBE facilities to
alkalytes.   This is also an option that has been discussed in the OFA and
MTBE Producer groups.   It certainly could be a viable "fallback" position to
stranded cost recovery.

However, Coastal is very differently situated than Enron in terms of stranded
costs or liability protection.   Refiners can't make as good a case for
stranded costs as the merchant producers of MTBE who developed unique
facilites directly in response to the Clean Air Act oxygenate mandate.   On
liability protection, refiners and marketers are more directly responsible
for groundwater contamination with MTBE because they have the leaking tanks
-- so they have what could be characterized as "contributory negligence",
where MTBE producers do not.

I agree with Steve Kean's response -- going after liability protection is
probably going to be more viable than finding stranded costs.   We will keep
pressing both issues, and distinguishing ourselves as one of the "good
actors" that responded to the Clean Air Act to produce MTBE and has not
contributed to gasoline spills.

 In terms of conversion to alkalytes, one of the complicating factors is the
"tax" angle.   In all the current legislative efforts in the House and
Senate, the sponsors are avoiding inclusion of tax provisions so that the
bills do not have to go through review by the separate tax committees, which
would delay the legislation probably to its demise.   Passing separate tax
legislation that contains alkalyte conversion provisions may also be
difficult -- in general, it will be hard for Congress to pass even modest tax
legislation this year.

If this emerges as a viable strategy, however, I think it is worth
consideration.   I will talk with Coastal to see what their strategy is and
follow up with you and Jim Prentice to see if it's appropriate to pursue.

Jeff

Stanley Horton
04/10/2000 05:49 PM
Sent by: Cindy Stark
To: Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: MTBE

Jeff:

At the fundraiser for Senator Thomas, I had the opportunity to discuss with
David Arledge (Coastal Corp's Chairman & CEO) the MTBE issue.

Coastal's position is somewhat different than Enron's.  Coastal is advocating
some sort of tax relief on alkalytes, which is the product they would convert
their plant to produce.  They also advocate protection of litigation.

David believes that Congress cannot approve a multi-million dollar bailout of
MTBE producers but can pass a tax relief bill that would encourage MTBE
producers to convert their plants.

Two questions for you:   1) What do you think of Coastal's approach? and  2)
Have you discussed the approach with Coastal?

Stan


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 06:19 PM -----

	"Julee Malinowski-Ball" <jmball@ns.net>
	03/20/2001 06:08 PM
	Please respond to "Julee Malinowski-Ball"

		 To: "Susan McCabe" <smccabe@mccabeandcompany.net>, "Scott Govenar"
<sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Ron Tom" <thackbarth@govadv.com>, "Robert Ross"
<robbiz@cwo.com>, "Rina Venturini" <rventurini@teamgsi.net>, "Phil Isenberg"
<Isenberg@HMOT.com>, "Mike Monagan" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Maureen OHaren"
<Oharen@HMOT.com>, "Marie Moretti" <mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Jamie Parker" <jparker@hmot.com>,
"Hedy Govenar" <hgovenar@govadv.com>, "DJ Smith"
<djsmith@smithandkempton.com>, "Delany Hunter" <dhunter@s-k-w.com>, "Chuck
Cole" <ccole@advocation-inc.com>, "Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>, "Anne
Kelly" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Fred Pownall" <fred_pownall@ka-pow.com>
		 cc: "Sue Mara" <smara@enron.com>, "Steve Ponder" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>,
"Stephanie Newell" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Sandi McCubbin"
<smccubbi@enron.com>, "Roger Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Richard
Hyde" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, "Paula Soos" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>,
"Lynn Lednicky" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Larrea, John"
<John.g.Larrea@williams.com>, "kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>,
"Kassandra Gough" <kgough@calpine.com>, "John Stout"
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "Jean Munoz" <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>,
"Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Greg Blue" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Rachel
King" <rachel.king@elpaso.com>, "Jan Smutny Jones" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Steven
Kelley" <steven@iepa.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Andy Brown"
<ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "Doug Kerner" <runwithmee@aol.com>, "Chris Ellison"
<CTE@eslawfirm.com>, "Karen Baker" <kebaker@ns.net>, <chudson@iepa.com>
		 Subject: AB 60x Follow-up Conf. Call

I have scheduled a conference call for tomorrow (Wed.) at 2pm to follow-up
on the draft amendments to AB 60x and Calpine's meeting in the Speaker's
office.  In summary, Calpine was not able to convince Rick Simpson to drop
the bill, nor was he interested in moving it in another direction on the
Assembly side.  On tomorrow's call we will be discussing what steps IEP and
member companies should take as this bill moves forward.

Please call: 800-403-2004
Pass Code: 753843

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net


see lotus notes problems
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/11/99 09:27 AM
---------------------------

Tanya Rohauer
05/05/99 06:01 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Belco Oil & Gas

Please see my Lotus Notes entry about changing the MAC clause. That should be
the last of the issues. Let's try to get this thing signed.

On another issue, why in the Lotus Notes Database, can I only send an e-mail
to credit people? I don't have the option of choosing anyone in legal, and
this is mainly whoi would use it for!

Let me know!

Thanks,
Tanya


Well actually no but I have been hanging out a lot with someone that I really
really like a lot.  And well, I haven't neccisarily been going without just
not in the past few weeks.


Good Afternoon!

Please send me the results of your phone interviews.

I need to begin to contact these candidates to arrange their transportation to Houston.

Please e-mail a yes or no for your candidates.

John Arnold - Michael Scarlata/Donald Timpanaro/Jeffrey Zaun
John Forney/Frank Ermis - Brandon Cochran/Ruben Lorenzo/Nicholas Watson
Dana Davis - Carl Zavaretti/Sam Zhou/Yvan Go
Doug Gilbert-Smith - Augustin Leon/Brian McNamara/Zoya Raynes

Thank you!!!

Adrianne
x57302


- attitude-1.jpg


The next Strategic Planning Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, November 21 @ 11:00 a.m. in ECN 49C2.  London will participate via video conference.  Dial-in numbers have been arranged for those unable to attend the meeting.

			Domestic#	800.745.1000
			Int'l#		801.977.0648
			Access code#	8531935

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor
Exec. Assistant to Greg Whalley
Office of the Chairman
Enron Corporation
Tel.   713.853.1935
Fax   713.853.1838


How was Cabo?  I'm sure it was great.

DG


i bought a big bertha and i was stroking it last night straight and deep.