At Enron, performance is formally evaluated twice a year and your feedback
plays an important role in the process.  In order for this process to be
successful, your participation is critical in meeting Enron,s Performance
Management goals.  Our goal of achieving 360 degree feedback is a key part of
the communication process at Enron.  This feedback helps foster teamwork, as
well as enables Enron to reward innovation and hard work.

The deadline for feedback to be submitted for the 2000 Performance Evaluation
Process (PEP) is FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 17. If you have been selected as a
reviewer, please take the time today to provide this feedback in order to
avoid possible system delays near the deadline.

You can access PEP at http://pep.corp.enron.com and select Performance Review
under Performance Review Services on the menu bar. Also, don,t forget to
complete your self evaluation -- simply select Self Evaluation under
Performance Review Services.

If you have any problems accessing the system or any questions regarding the
Performance Management Process, please contact:

  In Houston:
  _PEP Help Desk at (713) 853-4777, Option 4
  _perfmgmt@enron.com

In London:
  _PEP Help Desk at (44) 207-783-4040, Option 4
  _pep.enquiries@enron.com

Enron,s success each year can be attributed to the innovative and diligent
efforts of our employees.  Please help do your part to make sure each member
of the Enron team is recognized for his or her contributions. Thank you in
advance for your cooperation in helping make the Performance Review Process a
success.

Mark Frevert


Gentlemen,

Please find attached the slide on Enron Middle East.

Regards,
Sunita


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 05/23/2000
06:58 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           05/23/2000 06:56 PM

To: alb@cpuc.ca.gov
cc: PJPowerLaw@aol.com, GSullivan@sempra.com, hayley@turn.org,
alan_reid@pcp.ca, andy.bettwy@swgas.com, aod@newsdata.com,
askaff@energy-law-group.com, bcragg@gmssr.com, bho@cpuc.ca.gov,
bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us, burkee@cts.com, bwood@energy.state.ca.us,
ceyap@earthlink.net, chilen@llgm.com, chris.king@utility.com, chj@aelaw.com,
craigc@calpine.com, davef@abag.ca.gov, dcarroll@dbsr.com, ed@clfp.com,
edf@cpuc.ca.gov, eke@aelaw.com, eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us,
epoole@adplaw.com, evk1@pge.com, ewo@jmbm.com, eyq@cpuc.ca.gov,
furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil, garyb@abag.ca.gov,
gbudin@energy.state.ca.us, ghinners@reliantenergy.com,
grant_kolling@cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us, gtbl@dynegy.com, iep@iepa.com,
igsinc@ix.netcom.com, inggm@sce.com, jcattermole@pcenergy.com,
jkarp@whitecase.com, jleslie@luce.com, jmct@gmssr.com, jmpa@dynegy.com,
johnj@bcjlaw.com, joseh@lif.org, jsteffen@iid.com, jweil@aglet.org,
jwr@cpuc.ca.gov, karen@klindh.com, karpjos@sf.whitecase.com,
kfyip@seiworldwide.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, kmills@cfbf.com,
lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com, lmh@eslawfirm.com, ltt@cpuc.ca.gov,
mark.c.moench@wgp.twc.com, mcn@cpuc.ca.gov, mday@gmssr.com,
mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com, mjaske@energy.state.ca.us,
napedersen@jonesday.com, plg@cpuc.ca.gov, ram@cpuc.ca.gov,
raveen_maan@cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us, raw@cpuc.ca.gov, rbw@mrwassoc.com,
RCzahar@aol.com, rgloistein@orrick.com, rick.counihan@greenmountain.com,
rmp@cpuc.ca.gov, rochmanm@cubjpa.org, rochmanm@spurr.org,
ron_oechsler@rmiinc.com, RonKnecht@aol.com, rpelote@energy.twc.com,
rpetti@ladwp.com, salleyoo@dwt.com, sbs@cpuc.ca.gov, skatz@sempratrading.com,
slins@ci.glendale.ca.us, stomashe@energy.state.ca.us, tah@cpuc.ca.gov,
tdickers@westerngas.com, tom.roth@et.pge.com, vjb@cpuc.ca.gov,
marcel@turn.org, mbaldwin@igservice.com, jfawcet@enron.com,
Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com, marcel@turn.com

Subject: I.99-07-003

Dear Judge Biren:

 Transwestern Pipeline Company will be offering the following exhibits:

 1.  Prepared Direct Testimony of Jeffery C. Fawcett on Behalf of
Transwestern Pipeline Company in Support of the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement (Exhibit 12, incorporating Exhibit JCF-1) and

 2.  Prepared Rebuttal Testimony of Jeffery C. Fawcett on Behalf of
Transwestern Pipeline Company in Support of the Comprehensive Settlement
Agreement (Exhibit 17).

 Transwestern estimates it will need less than 10 minutes for direct
testimony.  Transwestern does not at this time intend to cross-examine any
witnesses; however, it reserves the right to request a reasonable amount of
time to examine witnesses on issues affecting Transwestern to the extent that
any party's live testimony differs from or conflicts with its prepared
testimony.

Susan Scott
Transwestern Pipeline Company
(713) 853-0596
susan.scott@enron.com


Joe R. will be sending out something in greater detail shortly, but it
appears that Equilon's management would like to pursue a deal with us on an
exclusive basis and that this decision is being forwarded to the Equilon
Board for approval.  If this acquisition goes forward, we will need to get
organized---in the near term---on a number of logistical/due diligence tasks,
but one thing we should start thinking about now is the "disclosure" issue.

If the Equilon Board gives the go-ahead for Equilon to pursue this
transaction , Equilon will probably want  to sign a memorandum of
understanding with us, and this may put us in a "disclosure" posture because
at that point, we would be looking at a $65 million deal (approx.) with a
closure probability of no less than 20% (in my judgment, based upon our past
dealings with these people).  Even without a signed document, the
"size/probability" test would still be an issue for us to deal with.
Everyone should be thinking about this issue as we await word from Equilon's
Board. Thanks.   SWD


please call me  in the am,  i want to know again the term, and the basis
quotes for the weekend put that you are asking for.  I would also like to run
the methodology by you and see if you agree.

Pete


RECAP:  This is Project Moosehead.  After the meeting, we determined that the
transaction should be structured as a cap and not a swaption.  The Fixed
Price is the premium.  The Strike is the Cap Price (remember, strikes are for
options and strikes are cap/floor in those deals).  We'll need to revise
today to send in the morning.  CP is "Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc.".
Enron party normally is ENA but we may change to EPMI and create a new ISDA
Master for the deal.  There must be a zero floor (ie, no negative payments in
the other direction).  Don't worry about weekend quotes yet because we may
eliminate weekends and extend the term of the deal.

Could you begin revising?  Also, do the calculations work?  Please feel free
to call me as I'm buried in my office today and things change as the day goes
on.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/16/99 12:53
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           12/16/99 11:08 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: "Financial Power Purchase Term Sheet" - 12/13/99

Sara,

If it's a Cap, is the Fixed Price then the Strike Price?  I think the format
looks good.  I would prefer a "Notice of Exercise" provision, but it's not
necessary.

Thanks,
Joe

Sara Shackleton
12/16/99 09:35 AM
To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: "Financial Power Purchase Term Sheet" - 12/13/99

I think that this transaction is called "Project Moosehead".  I have a
meeting on it this morning.  Please comment to the draft I sent to you
yesterday.  I don't know if the structure works.  I couldn't decide upon the
format; it also looks like a cap.  Thanks.  SS


Carolina,

I have finally received my tickets.  I will arrive at Ezeiza on United
Airlines flight #761 on Sunday, March 14 at 11:15 a.m.  Can you arrange to
have a driver meet me at the airport?  I will be staying at the Sheraton.
Thank you very much for your help.

Mark


Bill- fyi, Rick
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Deville, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, June 20, 2001 5:06 PM
To:	Butts, Bob; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Deville, Mike; Glisan, Ben
Subject:	Daily Cash Flow

The attached spreadsheet reflects your Business Unit's cash flow through June 19, 2001.


Jane

While you were gone I've been working hard in the interest of Boston
University!  As a result you will be hearing from a Mr. Jeffrey Skilling
and his daughter Kristen from Houston, Texas.

They were in town Friday for a visit. They went to the reception center
and took the tour.  They were favorably impressed. Kristen is a junior
and will probably be applying next year.

I told Mr. Skilling about you and was wondering when/if you could meet
Kristen. I don't think she will be coming back up here immediately. But
you visit schools in Houston and go to open houses there, don't you? At
the very least you could talk on the telephone.

If it is alright with you I'm giving him your email address and you
three could communicate. She will be an excellent candidate.  Her scores
are good and she plays field hockey and is a competitive swimmer.

Thanks Jane and welcome back,

Kay


It is Paige's 21st today (YIKES)  I'll be back Monday


I will check with Prebon asap.

   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:56 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

I double-checked with Bob, and he said Prebon reported these two trades as
peak. The other two were in fact reported as off-peak - he just entered them
incorrectly. But as far as this sleeve goes, there's no way one side is peak
and the other isn't - Prebon has to make up their minds!

Again, let me know what you find out. Until then, we recognize the two trades
as they are.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:59 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

That's what I was confused about because Prebon shows this deal as peak and
we show it as peak and I know it is the other side of a sleeve.  Can you
double check with Bob for accuracy.

Evelyn

   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:43 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

Does this mean that 598738 should be off peak hours as well? Because 598739
is only one side of a sleeve deal for EES. I would think that both sides need
to have the same hours......

Let me know, and I'll change them accordingly.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:43 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

sorry it is 598739

   Kate Symes @ ECT                05/02/2001 10:25 AM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

598736 and 598737 have been changed to off-peak hours. But I can't pull up
306927. Is this the right deal number?

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
05/02/2001 08:03 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Prebon deal errors from yesterday

Bob Badeer
deal 306927
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs

Bob Badeer
deal 598737
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs

Bob Badeer
deal 598736
Prebon shows as off-peak hours....enpower has peak hrs


How about next Monday or Tuesday?

-----Original Message-----
From: Amr Ibrahim [mailto:aibrahim1@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
Subject: Fw: Miss you guys

2nd time.

----- Original Message -----
From: Amr Ibrahim <mailto:aibrahim1@houston.rr.com>
To: rick.shapiro@enron.com <mailto:rick.shapiro@enron.com> ; jim.steffess@enron.com <mailto:jim.steffess@enron.com>
Cc: rickshapiro@hotmail.com <mailto:rickshapiro@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:22 AM
Subject: Miss you guys

Rick, Jim:

I miss you already.  Any plans for lunch this week I wonder?

Brgrds

AI


eThink Stuff For Sale!
That's right; get your very own eThink apparel, accessories and office
gadgets at the Signature Shop online.  Direct your web browser to the
Signature Shop, and then click "eThink Merchandise" to see the complete
line.  Happy shopping!

eSpeak is back!  Tuesday, December 5 at 10:00 am Houston time, please join
Chairman and CEO Ken Lay for an open-mike eSpeak event.  This is your last
chance of the year to ask Ken questions about the issues most important to
you.  Don't miss it!


I have been out of town for the last few days. I understand that Sara is out
for the rest of this week.

After reviewing, I believe the Short Position Assignment Agreement form
(Goldman Sachs) you sent last week needs some slight revision (including
retitling it Assignment and Assumption Agreement), and will need to
appropriately refer to the current Corporate Account Agreement between ECT
Investments, Inc. and GS,  and the one between ENA and GS (is there a
Corporate Account Agreement between GS and ENA?). It seems to me that the
document should apply to both short and long positions in the brokerage
account. Sheila, do you agree?

Once we revise the GS form, we could create a similar draft version for
Morgan Stanley and one for Bear Stearns. Is this an acceptable way forward so
we can get you where you want to go?

Finally, I had understood that Sara, after checking with the credit desk, was
going to look into the issue of what internal documentation, if any, would be
appropriate for transferring the OTC derivative positions. We will need her
input on this when she gets back early next week.

Alan

	Sheila Glover
	10/10/2000 04:09 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Terri Harlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Assumption and Assignment

Alan and Sara,
We have sent you the document from Goldman Sachs and are following up with
Morgan Stanley to get their agreement.
What else can we do to facilitate?
Thanks, Sheila

---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 03:59
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Terri Harlan                           10/10/2000 03:50 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Assumption and Assignment

Do we have any resolution on this issue yet?

Terri

---------------------- Forwarded by Terri Harlan/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 03:43
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Terri Harlan                           09/27/2000 01:32 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Assumption and Assignment

I received this letter form Goldman Sachs this morning.  According to them
short positions are the only ones that require this letter.  Can we
use/modify this letter and submit it to Morgan Stanley and Bear stearns, or
do we need to get something from each of them?  Please let me know.

Thanks,

Terri
3-9899

---------------------- Forwarded by Terri Harlan/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000 01:25
PM ---------------------------

"Sibeud, Eugenie B" <eugenie.sibeud@gs.com> on 09/27/2000 12:09:50 PM
To: "'Tharlan@enron.com'" <Tharlan@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Apologies for the delay.  My e-mail went totally dead last night, and has
just now come back.  (Apparently I have sent to many large document files).

Attached is the assignment agreement that we discussed.  Please feel free to
call me if you have any questions.  I can be reached at (212) 902-1930.

Kind regards,

Eugenie Sibeud

 <<Enron Assignment.doc>>

 - Enron Assignment.doc


I've added two new swaps to reflect the change from the California PX to the
Dow Jones index after 1/31/01. The following deal numbers cover the whole
term of the deal.

404980 - 9/1/00 through 1/31/01 @ PX NP15 Index
512726 - 2/1/01 through 8/31/03 @ DJ NP15 Peak Index
512743 - 2/1/01 through 8/31/01 @ DJ NP15 Off-Peak Index

Both new deals have comments that link them back to the original deal. Let me
know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Kate


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

April 20, 2001 5:00pm through April 23, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:      SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING:     SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:        ALSO SEE ORIGINAL REPORT
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Fri 4/20/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  8:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 4/20/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  6:00:00 AM PT
 Fri 4/20/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Mon 4/23/2001 at  2:00:00 PM London
Outage:  SysAdmiral Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  SysAdmiral Users
Purpose: SysAdmiral terminal server icons on General Cluster will not be
available due to maintenance.
Once the maintenance is completed the icons will point to the new 2.3.11
production and development environments.
Backout:  None
Contact(s):  Rusty Cheves  713-345-3798

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:       SEE ORIGINAL REPORT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
        FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management   (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
        (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


let's bring him in

	Christi L Nicolay@ECT
	10/02/2000 12:29 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wabash Valley called re: AEP filing

Don Morton, general counsel of Wabash Valley Power Association, a co-op in
AEP's area, called me about Enron's protest of AEP's market based rates
filing.  Wabash has filed an appeal in the DC Circuit of AEP/CSW merger (its
brief is due 11/20).  He thinks FERC is out of control and not carrying on
its duties.  Wabash is also preparing a protest of the Alliance compliance
filing (due this Friday 10/6) on the following grounds:

Filing is really a continuation of pancaking
Does not want FERC to approve on a "conditional" basis (expecting Alliance to
be a true RTO)--Wabash thinks that Alliance simply creates a larger profit
center for AEP's transmission system

Mr. Morton also had some specific OASIS problem examples that happened to
Wabash that involved preferential treatment for AEP.  I told him to call or
email Scott Miller for the investigation.

Mr. Morton and Wabash CEO, Ed Martin, would like to come to Houston to visit
with Enron about our concerns and about the possibility of making some joint
filings.  His number is 317-481-2815.  Please let me know if I should set
something up or if someone else would like to talk with him directly.


Please see the attached letter to Feinstein.


I would like to know where and how this is going to affect us and all the parameters.  Kim I know Mansoor is working on the project and I
will get with him.  I would like to be included in the discussions from the beginning on new I/C ideas and locations.

DS

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:08 PM
To:	Matthews, Ron; Abdmoulaie, Mansoor; Lokey, Teb; Kilmer III, Robert; Roensch, David; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Rapp, Bill; Guthrie, Robert
Subject:	Interconnect Agreement - Questar Southern Trails

All,

Please review the attached interconnect agreement between Transwestern and Questar.  It is fully reimbursable by Questar.  This interconnect will be a delivery point to Questar in the Blanco Hub.  FYI, the section of pipe that we are connecting the interconnect to is owned by Transwestern and is not part of the jointly owned facilities of the Blanco Hub.  If you have any questions, please feel free to call me to discuss.

Please reply back to me with any comments you may have.  I would like to send a draft to Questar on Tuesday morning, January 22, when we return from our holiday.

Bill and Robert - please see the red-lined language addressing the tax reimbursement.

Thanks for your time,

Kim.   X33098

 << File: Questar So Trails Hub Interconnect 01-15-02.doc >>


Notice No.  01-120
April 6, 2001

TO:
ALL COMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
Proposed Amendments to the Supplements of the Grade 1 Copper Futures
Contract, the Gold Futures Contract, the Silver Futures Contract, the
Aluminum Futures Contract, the Platinum Futures Contract and the Palladium
Futures Contract.

The Exchange proposes to amend the Supplements of the Grade 1 Copper Futures
Contract, the Gold Futures Contract, the Silver Futures Contract, the
Aluminum Futures Contract, the Platinum Futures Contract and the Palladium
Futures Contract. The proposed amendments update the addresses and telephone
numbers of the service providers to these contracts.

The proposed amendments must be approved by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC).  The Exchange membership will be notified when CFTC
approval is received and when these amendments will take effect.

For copies of the proposed amendments, please visit
http://www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/2001/ntm_120.pdf.  Underlining
indicates additions, bracketing [ ] indicates deletions.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Albert J.
Getz at 212-299-2608.

COMPLETE NOTICE (W/ PROPOSED AMENDMENTS) CAN BE FOUND AT
http://www.nymex.com/refernce/notices/2001/ntm_120.pdf

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-120)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Regarding the Summary of Proposed Agreement Between Enron and Catalytica that
accompanied the Confirmation for the spark spread derivative appended to Sean
Black's E-Mail forwarded to you earlier today, please note that the Summary
has been revised ( see attachment below ). However, Attachment 1 to the
revised Summary, which sets forth the general terms and conditions of the
spark spread option, is unchanged from Attachment 1 to the previously
delivered Summary. In addition, I've found no other indication in my files or
E-Mail messages that the Confirmation you initially furnished was modified
when it was sent to Catalytica or otherwise modified to date. By copy hereof
I'm requesting Sean confirm that fact so we are sure we are still working
from the same page.
---------------------- Forwarded by Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/01/99 01:30 PM
---------------------------

Sean Black
08/31/99 11:11 AM
To: Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brad Nebergall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Holmes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Wehn/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT
Subject: Pastoria

Dale/Bart,

Attached below is the latest revision of the proposed agreement between Enron
and CCSI concerning the 10 mm prepayment.  The CCSI board gave preliminary
approval of the agreement yesterday and their accountants are also on board,
so we need to get a draft of a legally binding agreement together that we can
resend to Catalytica for review and approval.

Regarding the Enron/GE Agreement, we are still awaiting GE's formal revisions
to the agreement.  However, we spoke with them last week about their main
concerns.  From my notes, the following is a summary of the comments that GE
had and the areas where we expect that they will revise the language (refer
to the agreement sent to GE on 8/13/99): As you will note, the two key issues
GE is concerned with are (1) assignability and (2) the definition of the
'purchase option.'

Comments from GE conference call:

Recital Section:

Item K - GE has not agreed to fund total remaining cost; GE and CTAL have
agreed to seek out additional funds and will, themselves, commit some
additional funds.  However, their concern is the extreme event where they
have grossly underestimated the costs to develop XONON and they do not want
to be committed to funding a 'limitless' gap if CTAL will not cough up money
or some other form of value and/or no other external source of funding can be
found.  In this case, we need to be covered through both agreements in the
sense that GE would need to provide us a XONON credit (which may be worthless
if the technology has not been developed for any one of the three product
lines) and we would pass the credit through to CTAL in exchange for the spark
spread (in otherwords, CTAL needs to take on this risk, not Enron).  In sum,
GE feels that  they will only fund XONON if they get an order for Pastoria.

Item N - GE will revise this language because they feel we should be at least
committed to purchasing GE equipment, assuming that Pastoria goes through and
this item, as written, implies to them that we should have no obligation to
purchase GE equipment, even if Pastoria goes ahead (e.g., implies to them
that we could go back and purchase ABB or Westinghouse, etc. if Pastoria goes
ahead, at our discretion)

2.3 - Change date to March, 2001 for a 2003 COD and March 2002 for a 2004 COD.

3.4 - Same revision as for 2.3

3.6 - Related to Item N of the recitals; GE wants to revise or clarify the
meaning of "Purchase Option" to mean an intent by Enron to purchase equipment
from GE if Pastoria goes ahead.

3.8 - Limit GE's participation to providing information and/or documentation
on XONON for the permitting process

3.11 - OKAY with the concept but want to revise it to relate to XONON
technology rather than turbines.

5.3 - Want to define a configuration for 750 MW here, in the event that this
is the size that is chosen by the developers.

9.2 - This is the big issue with GE; they don't want such 'broad'
assignability for this agreement, as they have previously agreed to at
Pittsburg and other projects because the language is so broad.  They are
going to revise this language and I expect the definition to be 'narrower'.

Our plans for reaching closure on the agreement with GE are the following:

1.  Receive revised agreement from GE (hopefully by the end of today)

2.  Incorporate your recent comments to the GE Agreement (the comments
received after 8/13)

3.  Brad and Chris to travel to SF to meet with Dave Parquet and Sam Wehn to
review revised document in person and incorporate their final comments.

4.  Send agreement back to GE for final review and comment.

At this point, we need to begin revising the Enron/CTAL Agreement below into
a legally binding document.  Bart, if you have not already done so, could you
begin revising this agreement accordingly.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Regards,


Ben

It was really nice meeting you.  I'm glad that you enjoyed your visit.  I
apologize that you didn't get a chance to talk with Dr. Harris, but it
sounds like you have addressed that issue in your essays.  Best of luck

Regards
Meg

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com [mailto:Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 7:24 PM
To: Meg.Brooks@bus.utexas.edu
Subject: RE: Admission Visit

     Thanks for the informative infomation session this past Friday.  Also,
thank you for taking the time to listen to my situation regarding my
application and talking to Dr. Harris for me.  After meeting with many of
the faculty and staff (Professors Brown, Titman, Jemison & Ronn) at the
School, my desire to attend the School is quite strong.  The School is a
perfect fit for the career I am trying to pursue in energy and is a
institution where I would be able to contribute to and learn from the
energy-finance program due to my experiences with Enron.  Eventhough I have
tested poorly on tests such as the GMAT, I feel that the rest of my
application is quite strong and that I have proven that I can successfully
compete in a competitive environment (ie. Enron).  I excel in environments
(team-oriented) such as described by the many people I talked with at the
Texas B-School.
     Again, thanks for taking the time to talk with me about my application
and it was good to see someone from Boston, who lived in DC and was now
living in Texas, such as myself.

Regards,

Ben Rogers


Yair:

It's a good thing you didn't try to get back to me!  Sorrry.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	"Yaish, Yair (OGC)" <YYaish@exchange.ml.com>
	04/12/2001 10:16 AM

		 To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Sara, sorry i didn't get back to you yesterday, I was out sick.  I didn't
notice anything attached, did u send a subsequent e-mail?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:01 PM
To: YYaish@exchange.ml.com
Cc: Tracy.Ngo@enron.com
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13
Importance: High

Yair:

Attached is my redline.  Call me so that we can discuss the remaining
issues, including:

(1)  Calculation Agent.  We believe that the existing dispute mechanism is
adequate.

(2)  Procedures for Entering into Transactions.  There is no procedure for
dual confirms.  This is too confusing.

(3)  Transfer.  We cannot agree to your assignment provision as it is too
subjective.

The other changes were not substantive.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

                    "Yaish, Yair
                    (OGC)"                To:
"'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    <YYaish@exchan        cc:
                    ge.ml.com>            Subject:     RE: ISDA
Schedule/Paragraph 13

                    04/10/2001
                    07:46 AM

Sara, any thoughts on my comments ISDA I sent out last week?

-----Original Message-----
From: Yaish, Yair (OGC)
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:19 PM
To: 'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'
Subject: RE: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Sara, I have good news, I think we are very close to executing this baby.

I am attahcing comments to the ISDA.  They reflect comments by our outside
cousel which highlight the differences between this contract and the side
letter/ML ISDA.  They are not much.  I have also made some changes directly
on their draft where I either concurred with Enron or needed to make some
of my own changes.  Pls review and let me know what you think.

I will be leaving the office soon, so if we can wrap it up tomorrow that
would be great (I'm out Monday for Passover).

Yair Yaish
Director and Senior Counsel
Allegheny Energy Global Markets, LLC
212-236-7346

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 4:10 PM
To: yyaish@exchange.ml.com
Subject: ISDA Schedule/Paragraph 13

Yair:

Attached is a blacklined (against the Enron North America Corp. draft of
3/15/01) Schedule and Paragraph 13 to the ISDA Credit Support Annex.  I
have tried to incorporate the essence of the March 19, 2001 "swap side
letter agreement."  Please call me to discuss as it would be nice to
finalize by April 6.  Thanks.

(See attached file: 098a Blackline ctr (Allegheny Energy Supply).doc)

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Hi David,

I've made the changes to the cover sheet regarding the Master Power agreement.  Here's the redline.

It seems to me that we are missing an October payment date on Exhibit 5 of the EMSA, so I'll add one.  Also, Marvin found a typo on page 11 (sub h) regarding the SEPA MWHrs - should be 16,500.  I'll change this.  Any other changes?

Thanks,

Kay


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
11/21/00 MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
11/21/00 MANAGEMENT-GAS 1,353,409
11/21/00 MANAGEMENT-PWR 199,788
11/21/00 AGG-MANAGEMENT 1,339,756


I will look into it.

Peter F Keavey
12/07/2000 07:06 AM
To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL trades doubled up?

Jeff,

since Dutch is still out could you take care of this ??  I'm not exactly sure
what he is talking about.  The trades should be part of a spread in whcich
reliant is also buying or selling the hub.
Thanks

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
07:03 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Larry Joe Hunter                           12/06/2000 08:36 PM

To: Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL trades doubled up?

Pete,

I'm seeing some trades with your name as Trader which are at extremely high
prices.   Transco Z6 vs. Henry Hub trades at prices of $15.6025 from Trade
Date of 12/5.  Are these errors?  EOL numbers are 658961 and 658985 (both
with Reliant).  No confirmation has been sent on these.  Please have your
Book Admin notify me as soon as you get a chance to look at these.

Thanks,
Joe Hunter


would you please grant origination on the following transactions.

	sitara 1180653		nrg buy 20000/d  11/20   $2.60
	sitara  1180652		el paso sell 20000/d  11/20   $2.75

	org			$3000

	sitara  1176133		duke  tennz6 purchase 1500  $2.25  for blackhills

	org				$375

	sitara  1175889		select   11/17  vol of 7568   supply cost $2.17   sell $2.40
					11/18  vol of 2949
					11/20  vol of 4449

	org $3342

	sitara  1169440		sell to elpaso  9000  org $0.04    org amount  $360

	total org $7077


No, I didn't see my mom for Mother's Day because they left early Sunday morning to go to New England for about 10 days.  So, I'm glad that they feel okay to travel!  We'll do something after they get back to celebrate both my birthday and Mother's Day.

My weekend was fine.  I didn't do anything exciting....didn't really feel like going out.  I did run both days and am starting back at the gym today so I can become superbuff.  I've lost 6 lbs during this whole thing at least.  Just 9 more lbs to my goal of 140.  I saw Rayfael Friday when he came over to bring me a birthday present (he didn't think I was home!)  Then I took him some stuff that was at my house yesterday and we hung out a little bit.  I'm still hoping there's a chance we can get back together, but I don't want to get my hopes up too much.  He definitely needs some time to himself and to get over this bout of depression.  I just hope that if he does, then he wants to get back together then, but I'm not sure he does.  We'll see.  I'm not interested in seeing anyone else right away, so I guess I can afford to give it a little time.  Can you put a spell on him?  hehehe

Of course, if we do get back together, that's bad news for the puppies.  If it did come to that, though, I would take them to doggie daycare during the day and they could stay outside at night - that wouldn't be so bad and they wouldn't be lonely.  Anyway, that's a BIG IF that I really shouldn't be concentrating on...so there.

How are things in Germany?  How was your trip to London?  I saw Heather in the elevator here last week, but I didn't get a chance to talk to her.

Write back!!!

Scott


i cannot go to denver the last week of may b/c i have to be here for work.
the last week is when we set gas prices for the next month.  i think the best
thing for me to do is come to phoenix one weekend.  i have been golfing
lately.  i got a lesson and the teacher gave me a new swing.  i am kind of
struggling with it now.  i think it will take me to the next level.  i will
try to call you and grandma this weekend.

matt


I do know Jana.  She has worked in various positions within my group for
years since she joined us in the analyst program.  She has not been the
strongest player.  Her level of accuracy has not been what we would have
liked in many of the roles that she has played for us (confirmations and
settlements).  And despite feedback, she is one of those players that just
has never quite viewed her performance level in the same light that we see
it.  She currently supports trading operations for South America, reporting
to Martha Stevens under Scott Mills.  Let me check with Scott on his thoughts
about her current performance and on her in an HR role.  I will let you know
what he thinks.  It may be to date that we just haven't had Jana in the right
role for her.  If I remember correctly, she was originally a teacher who went
back to school to get a business degree.  Very sweet, pleasant to work with
and personable.  I will get back with you after I have talked with Scott, or
I may have him leave you a message.

Cindy Olson@ENRON
11/09/2000 10:05 AM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thank you

Sally, do you know Jana?????  Would you recommend her???
---------------------- Forwarded by Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000
09:58 AM ---------------------------

Jana Morse
11/09/2000 09:05 AM
To: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Thank you

Cindy,
I just wanted to thank you for you time, information, and encouragement
yesterday.  Any guidance you can provide on how I should approach a career
change to Human Resources is very welcome.

I've attached my resume for your review and consideration.  I look forward to
hearing from you soon.

Thanks again,
Jana Morse x30972


Thanks Kay.  Dale is to call me this morning with the GF contact name and I
will get a heads up to that person this morning, providing Peter's mark - ups
and final.


Reminder:

The library will close at 5pm on Wednesday, November 22, for the
Thanksgiving holiday and will remain closed until Friday, 1pm. There will
be no email reference after Tuesday, November 21 until the following
Monday, November 27.

Regular library hours and reference service will resume on Monday, November
27. Friday and weekend hours for the library during Thanksgiving week are:

Friday, November 24    -- 1:00 - 5:00 pm
Saturday, November 25  -- 12 noon - 5:00 pm
Sunday, November 26    -- 12 noon - 8:00 pm

Have a relaxing break!
Monica Singh


Laurel:  Please call me about Chase.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


kay, see when this is and if I can go?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/12/2000
03:39 PM ---------------------------

Greg Whalley
11/09/2000 02:55 PM
Sent by: Liz M Taylor
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, PEGGY
FOWLER/ENRON@enronxgate, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, J Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen S Owens@ees, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Joseph W Sutton@Enron, Thomas E White/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: ENW Holiday Party Online Invitation

Here it is!  Your Enron Net Works Holiday Party Invitation.  Please click on
the attached link to launch.

http://207.21.193.94/Extravaganza.html

Please contact my assistant, Liz Taylor @ x31935, should you experience any
difficulty with the link.

Greg


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Monday, March 04, 2002 2:04 PM
To:	Corey, Paula
Subject:	RE: CQG Update

Please take away my access.  And I believe the following people are no longer with Enron, Martin Cuilla, Brad McKay, Denver Plachy, Sylvia Pollan, and Kevin Ruscitti.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corey, Paula
Sent:	Monday, March 04, 2002 1:51 PM
To:	Arora, Harry; Bond, Ragan; Broderick, Paul J.; Chilkina, Elena; Cuilla, Martin; De La Ossa, Mario; Des Champs, Joseph; Driscoll-Ernest, Marde L.; Harrell, Willie; Germany, Chris; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Herndon, Rogers; Herndon, Rogers; Hewitt, Jess P.; Jenkins, Alicia; Jenkins, Beth; Knoblauh, Jay; Lagrasta, Fred; Mckay, Brad; Misra, Narsimha; Misra, Narsimha; Modi, Rishi; Plachy, Denver; Pollan, Sylvia S.; Ruscitti, Kevin; Shahi, Pushkar; Shireman, Kristann; Vanderhorst, Barry; Vanderhorst, Barry; Nielsen, Jeff; Perez, Agustin; Perez, Agustin; Burnham, Steven
Cc:	Hartstein, Roy; Harrington, Stephen
Subject:	CQG Update

All -

You are receiving this email because you are listed as a current CQG user. The Market Data group is in the process of re-negotiating our existing contract. The approximate ongoing cost for your workstation will be $545.00 per month excluding taxes, exchange fees, and circuit costs. Our monthly cost for circuits is approximately $1600.00 and will be divided among all remaining users.

Please respond to this email with your company number and RC indicating your ongoing acceptance prior to March 11.

Thank you

Paula Corey
Sr. Contracts Manager


Desk	 Short Term Northwest	 Short Term California	 Short Term Southwest	 Short Term West BOM
Flow Date	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001	 10/13/2001
Deal Number	 814886	  	  	 815035	  	  	 815078	  	  	 NOTING TO REAL TIME
Delivery Point	 Mid Columbia	  	  	 SP-15	  	  	 West Wing - 500
CTPY	 PGE	  	  	 CA Imbalance	  	  	 PSCO
MWH	 18	  	  	 25	  	  	 13
Position	 Short	  	  	 Long	  	  	 Park
Hours	 Peak	  	  	 Peak	  	  	 HE 13 - 21
 Price 	 N/A 	 	  	  $                  25.16 	 	  	  $                           22.00

 	 Short Term Northwest	 Short Term California	 Short Term Southwest	 Short Term West BOM
1	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
2	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
3	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
4	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
5	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
6	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
7	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
8	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
9	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
10	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
11	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
12	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
13	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	13.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
14	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	13.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
15	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	13.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
16	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	13.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
17	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	13.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
18	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	13.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
19	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	13.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
20	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	13.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
21	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	13.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
22	 (18.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	25.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
23	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
24	 0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00
Total	 (288.00)	 0.00 	0.00 	400.00 	0.00 	0.00 	117.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00 	0.00


I am now asking for  August 28, 2000.

Thanks,

Kay

Venita Coleman@ENRON
07/12/2000 05:03 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie A
Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect
Subject: QBR HPL/LRC/Upstream Origination

Julie is available on August 22, 2000.
---------------------- Forwarded by Venita Coleman/Corp/Enron on 07/12/2000
04:57 PM ---------------------------

	From:  David W Delainey @ ECT                           07/12/2000 03:40 PM

Sent by: Kay Chapman@ECT
To: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie A
Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Venita
Coleman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicki
Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect

Subject: QBR HPL/LRC/Upstream Origination

Dave and Mark have asked me to arrange a meeting, QBR HPL/LRC/Upstream
Origination, and I would like to know if August 22, 2000 from 1:00 - 5:00 pm
will work for all of you?

Thank you in advance for your promt attention to this matter.

Thanks,

Kay 3-0643


Thanks,  That does the trick.


Rebecca. attached you will find the presentation for the HPL deal.  Please
forward to Jeff.  If you have any questions or comments do not hesitate to
give me a call.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000
04:21 PM ---------------------------

Patrick Wade
12/19/2000 04:12 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


Hey.  I went on a company outing to Aransas Pass last week.  Left Wed afternoon and got back Friday afternoon.  One of the pipelines I deal with has a hunting and fishing lodge down there.  It was nice.  I caught 2 redfish - both keepers too!  The guide would bait my hook and throw it in the water.  All I had to do was sit there and look pretty till the fish started biting.  I could really get used to that sort of thing.

The fishing guide said I should expect to pay about $1,000/ft for my fishing boat.  I guess my boat will only be about 4 ft long.   Keep looking for my BOAT.

Let's see - the ex wife came in from Denver for a wedding Friday night.  She stayed with me all weekend.  I took her to the airport this morining.  Things went pretty well - no romance, just good friends.  I introduced her to my girlfriend - we all had lunch together.  That was a little odd.

Nothing else going on.  I'll try to have an update on the legal stuff by Wed.

Later Gator.


Start Date: 1/26/02; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012606.txt


PROCESSING

NONE

TENDERED

24198	Richardson	Eff 1/23/02		35,714/d	Add Blk #16		Tendered 1/22

25374	Oneok		Ext to 2/28/02	12,500/d	Panhdle to Beaver	EXECUTED

25841	PG&E		Eff 2/2-2/28/02	39,200/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

26511	PG&E		Eff 2/2-2/28/02	21,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

26758	Duke		Eff 1/30/02		40,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

26758	Duke		Eff 2/02		40,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

26819	Reliant	Eff 2/02		10,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27342	Sempra		Eff 2/02		30,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27352	Sempra		Eff 2/02		21,500/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27377	Agave		Ext to 3/31/02	10,000/d	Pecos to W. Ward	Tendered 1/24

27377	Agave		Eff 2/02		10,000/d	Swap RP Vol		EXECUTED

27420	WTG		Eff 2/02 Only		2,700/d	Panhdle to Winkler	EXECUTED

27496	Reliant	Ext to 2/28/02	30,000/d	San Juan to Blmfld	EXECUTED

27723	Wasatch	Eff 3/02		1,200/d	Increase MDQ		Tendered 1/30

27803	BP		1/1/03-12/31/04	25,000/d	Blmfld to Needles	Tendered 1/28

27813	Sempra		2/1/02-2/28/02	15,000/d	Blmfld to Topock	EXECUTED

27819	PG&E		2/1/02-10/31/02	20,000/d	Blmfld to Calif	EXECUTED

27821	Cinergy	2/1-2/28/02		5,000/d	Cen Pool to Topock	Tendered 1/29


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

Now you have the power to open up data in new ways to more users: Itron
introduces the industry's first open platform to provide direct access to
critical C_customer usage data. A user-friendly Universal Calculation Engine
and third party application development environment extend the value of your
MV-90 investment.  Learn more about the new MV-90 ENTERPRISE EDITION
information exchange server when you visit with us at the CIS Conference.

Visit us at www.itron.com
[IMAGE]

Are you looking to invest in, attract investors for, provide services to or
understand the business and technology dynamics of the hottest companies
emerging in the energy sector?   Attend the Energy Venture Fair, June 25 &
26, 2001, in Boston, MA and hear CEOs from 75 hot energy companies present
their business plans.  Complete event description available at
www.energyventurefair.com or call Nannette Mooney at (818) 888-4445, ext. 11.

[IMAGE]

"Global Power & Western U.S. Coal:  Domino Factors at Play in Today's Energy
Markets" is the theme of the 2001 Spring Pacific Coal Forum (Coal Forum'2001)
to be hosted by the Western Coal Council, June 4-6, 2001 in Park City, Utah.
Keynote Speakers include: Honorable Mike Leavitt, Governor, State of Utah;
Hitoshi Tagawa, Tokyo Electric Power Company; Eng. Jesus Buentello, Comision
Federal de Electricidad; Malcolm Thomas, Kennecott Energy Company; Manfred
Raschke, International Strategic Information Services (ISIS).
Contact Janet Gellici at (303) 431-1456 or info@westcoal.org
www.westerncoalcouncil.org.
Correction to 5/14/01 IssueAlert
The chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas is Pat Wood III, not
Carl Wood as stated. Pat Wood III has been nominated for a position with
FERC.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
May 15, 2001

Bright Skies Ahead for Solar Power?

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]Shares in companies that make alternative energy technologies have
climbed as a result of California's latest round of statewide blackouts.
Shares in solar power producing companies in particular have embarked on a
recent increase. For instance, Evergreen Solar (Nasdaq: ESLR) recently jumped
up about 6.8 percent, to be currently priced at $10.35 (representing an
annual increase of 76 percent). Evergreen's main competitor AstroPower
(Nasdaq: APWR) gained about 4.2 percent and is currently priced at $45.16
(representing an annual increase of 55 percent). According to a report in
Reuters, James Logerfo, an analyst with Bank of America Montgomery, concluded
that the increase is "speculative buying across the energy industry. Some are
buying without appreciating how far away these companies are from having real
products and some are building for a trade this summer. They are not buying
to hold the stocks for five years, but for five months or five weeks."

Analysis: Regardless of the prospectus for solar power stocks, it certainly
appears that solar power in general is finding a new niche as a direct result
of compromised supplies of more traditional fuel sources such as natural gas.
Renewed interest from investors in solar power is probably a direct result of
concerns about existing power supply in a handful of Western states. However,
at the same time, solar power companies such as Evergreen Solar and
AstroPower also are turning in strong profits for 1Q 2001, which represents a
positive turnaround for both companies. The combination of strong investor
interest and an upswing in profits indicates that solar power could be
embarking on a market boom that up to only a few years ago was seen as very
unlikely. The question is whether the turnaround will be temporary, or if
solar power companies truly have found a permanent "place in the sun."

Companies involved in solar energy typically have a business model that is
founded on the technology of photovoltaics, which is basically the process of
absorbing photons from the sun or other light sources and turning them into
electrons. According to recent reports, demand for solar cells grew by 40
percent in 2000. Questions about the reliability of power supply provided by
traditional utilities that have been sparked by the California situation
presumably will only result in greater interest. Consequently, those
companies that have been on the forefront of solar power research and
development for years are now starting to reap the benefits of their
efforts.

Recent financial reports seem to support this theory. For instance, Evergreen
Solar-which develops, manufactures and markets solar power products based on
its patented String Ribbon technology-reported product revenues of $146,000,
an increase of 535 percent when compared to revenues of $23,000 for the same
period in 2000. Granted, the company absorbed a net loss for 1Q 2001 of $2.4
million, as compared with a net loss of $664,000 for 1Q 2000. However,
Evergreen remains pleased by its most recent financial performance, which it
attributes to geographic diversification and growing market opportunities for
solar power.

The company's sales since 1997 have been composed primarily of solar panels.
Evergreen plans to begin large-scale manufacturing of its solar power
products in a new manufacturing facility this year. Evergreen's principal
objective is to become a leading producer of high-quality solar power
products, primarily for the on-grid market and the off-grid rural
electrification market. What makes the company unique, according to
Evergreen, is its String Ribbon technology, which reportedly avoids the
slicing of a solid block of silicon, which is required for most solar-power
technologies. Evergreen's String Ribbon technology reportedly cuts the use of
silicon in half, which reduces manufacturing costs without impairing product
reliability.

As noted, AstroPower-which develops, manufacturers and markets PV solar
cells, modules, panels, and systems-also reported a strong first quarter.
Total revenues for AstroPower were $14,304,000, an increase of 37.5 percent
from 1Q 2000. Product revenues were $13,581,000, an increase of 40.4 percent
from the same period in the previous year. AstroPower is reporting continued
strong performance for the company, and in fact has stated that it has far
more sales opportunities than it can supply.

There are other companies besides the two I've mentioned that are actively
involved in solar power (for instance, Amonix, BP Solar and United Solar, to
name a few). However, the suddenly strong performance of both Evergreen Solar
and Active Power-after previous quarters, and even decades, of financial
losses-indicates that market opportunities have opened up considerably for
companies involved in solar power development and marketing.

So, what explains the sudden resurgence of solar power, which last
experienced any significantly widespread interest in the late 1970s? I think
there are several factors driving this renewed interest. The California
impact is obvious, as the state's energy crisis has shaken many Americans
into a new awareness about a national energy crisis. However, I think the
explanation goes deeper than that. In addition to the California impact,
natural-gas prices are now at such a high level that alternatives such as
solar power, which were previously perceived as cost prohibitive, now are
becoming cost-competitive.

In addition, many states and the federal government are providing tax
incentives for businesses that employ solar electric systems, which is making
solar panels appealing to a mass market. California reportedly pays one-half
of the costs associated with a solar electric system that a business
establishes; Illinois and Maryland are implementing similar credits. The
federal government also provides a 10-percent commercial solar tax credit to
businesses that employ a solar system, and those businesses are also eligible
for a five-year, accelerated depreciated tax reduction. Personal energy
credits related to solar power were repealed in the early 1980s, but some
states like California are implementing "net metering" policies that make it
easier for residential customers to install renewables-based generation
(solar and wind) at their homes. In any case, solar power is becoming more
financially feasible for businesses, which is an important factor considering
that most solar systems still cost between $5,000 and $20,000.

However, despite this renewed interest and projected growth, the American
public as a whole is still rather leery about solar power. This is a sharp
contrast to foreign countries, especially where interconnecting to power
grids is cumbersome. In fact, more than three-quarters of the photovoltaic
cells produced in the United States are sold abroad, and foreign production
of solar panels internationally has increased 39 percent while U.S.
production has increased by 29 percent.

There are several reasons driving the general reluctance toward this
alternative form of power in this country. First, many still believe that
solar power is not (and will not become) competitive with more conventional
sources of electricity, such as natural gas or coal. As has been often
repeated, although the sun is free the devices used to capture it are
expensive. This has kept many end-users, utilities and independent power
producers tied to their more traditional fuel sources. Another reason is that
many homeowners and building associations across the country are not
receptive to solar power, which serves as a deterrent for potential customers
that may want to use the sun to power new projects. A third reason is that,
in most areas of the country, the sun (like the wind) is an intermittent fuel
source, and battery systems that are often expensive must be used to store
the power from the sun.

The other drawback to solar power is the lack of priority it has received
from the Bush administration. In April, President Bush proposed cutting more
than $200 million from the federal renewable energy and efficiency research
programs, which support funding for solar power and other renewable projects.
The budget will still provide about $186 million to solar, wind and other
renewable projects (down from current spending levels of $376 million).
However, the cuts have been perceived by many as a lack of support for
renewable projects by the new administration. In fairness to President Bush,
his energy task force, which is scheduled to release its energy plan this
week, has a potential energy crisis to solve and is focused on immediate
solutions.

Nevertheless, apart from the Bush administration's energy plan, by all
appearances solar power appears to be on the brink of new market interest.
How extensive this renewed interest will become, and to what extent solar
power will emerge as a viable power source alternative across the national
mass market, remain to be seen. Also, as noted in the report from Reuters,
investors may be demonstrating only temporary interest in solar power, in
anticipation of ongoing power shortages this summer. However, given the high
prices of natural gas, concerns about emissions from coal and ongoing public
resistance to nuclear energy, more than any other time in the last two
decades solar power's future looks pretty bright.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power System by
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH.

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily email, send a message to
IssueAlert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


your right...................how's my man..?........did .....You....miss me?


There must be something I have missed. The work order was submitted to Marketing for approvals and is in SAP but has not been released to date. The middle of February in-service date mentioned below is out of the question. I have not received word that pogo has given the go ahead for design or materials. We are doing the design (e-mail of 1-8-01) in preparation that they will want the interconnect.
Please bring me up to date if there have been changes since the first week of January and if the scope of the project has changes since the cost estimate and materials requirements were submitted in early January.

Thanks
Earl Chanley
---------------------- Forwarded by Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron on 01/31/2001 06:52 AM ---------------------------

Rich Jolly
01/30/2001 10:59 AM
To:	Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura Kunkel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: Pogo Interconnect

Our goal this year for UAF is set at .04. We'll need all this equipment in order to monitor this facility. Thanks for everyone's help.
Thanks
Rich

Arnie Bailey
01/30/2001 04:53 PM

To:	Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Laura Kunkel/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject:	Re: Pogo Interconnect

Michelle,
In speaking with Laura Kunkle yesterday I learned that the land owner notification was sent on 1-08-01 and should be back by about 2-7-01.  Also the Environmental matrix is in the hands of Butch Russell in Albuquerque, so should be ready this week.  The electrical drawings are being done by Frances Balderas in Omaha and be ready by this weeks end.
My understanding is that Pogo will build the facility per our spec's and we will operate it.  They won't purchase materials until their well comes in.  Pogo anticipates the well should be completed in about a week and a half.
Just to recap, we will need a chromatograph, sulphur monitor, water monitor, flow control, positive shut-in and a means of overpressure protection.  The chromatograph will require commercial electricity.  Operation of the facility without the above will have to be approved by Rich Jolly.
George Kneisley, do you have any input not mentioned above?
In speaking with you yesterday, I think all of these are covered, but just want to make sure.
Thanks,  Arnie

---------------------- Forwarded by Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron on 01/30/2001 04:30 PM ---------------------------

Arnie Bailey
01/19/2001 09:21 AM

To:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Re: Pogo Interconnect

Rich,
The POGO well isn't completed yet.  They expect to be down within three weeks.  This well is adjacent to the big EOG well that came into our system a couple of months ago and is in the same formation.  The EOG gas is still good gas so far.  Hopefully POGO's gas will be the same.
Thanks,  Arnie

Rich Jolly
01/18/2001 09:02 AM
To:	Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron
cc:	Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Re: Pogo Interconnect

Mike this is in your court now. Can it be installed by the middle of February? Arnie has anyone seen  a gas analysis on this?
Thanks
Rich

Michelle Lokay
01/18/2001 08:42 AM

To:	Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Re: Pogo Interconnect

According to John Havard with Pogo, we are to continue on.  With the work order approved, I was told the landowner's notification had already begun.  Pogo is buying the required equipment (including chromotograph, monitors, etc.), per our specifications.  They will own the equipment, but we will operate.  Let me know if you guys have additional information...is this still possible by the middle of February?  Thanks.

Rich Jolly
01/17/2001 05:46 AM
To:	Arnie Bailey/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Re: Pogo Interconnect

Thanks Arnie. Even if Pogo owns the meter station we want to operate it including the flow control.This is one of the ways we're keeping our UAF down. If I can help let me know. We do need to discuss who will operate the facilities asap.
RJ

Arnie Bailey
01/16/2001 03:55 PM

To:	Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:	Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, George Kneisley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Team Carlsbad/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mike McCracken/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject:	Pogo Interconnect

Michelle,

I was wondering where we stand now on the Pogo interconnect South of WT-1 on the West Texas Lateral.  Per our phone conversation a few days ago it sounded like the 30 day landowner notification would be the biggest hold up.  What will be the design capacity for the interconnect?  I think you told me, but I can't find it in my notes.  My understanding is that there will be a chromatograph, sulfur monitor, water monitor, flow control and a way to shut in if pressure reaches our MAOP.  Also, who will own and operate the station?  Let me know if I'm off base on any of this or what I've missed and also don't hesitate to call if you need anything.  Please let us know as things progress.

Thanks,  Arnie

Work - 505-625-8005
Home - 505-627-9230
Cell - 505-626-1530
Page - 800-586-5735

<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


i have seen you play and i don't need to worry about shit


As you are aware, Enron signed an agreement with Blockbuster Inc. last summer
to launch an entertainment on-demand service.  We announced today that we are
discontinuing our exclusive relationship with Blockbuster in order to expand
the offering by developing direct relationships with content providers and
distribution partners.

We have made tremendous progress toward our goal of becoming the leading
provider of entertainment on-demand over a digital platform.  We rolled out
the trial service in Seattle, Portland, Salt Lake City and New York in
December, and today subscribers are buying movies on-demand using the service
we created.

However, the exclusive relationship with Blockbuster has not yielded the
quantity and quality of movies needed to drive demand for this exciting, new
on-demand service.  Now that we have proven the concept, we want to take our
service to the next level by adding content and subscribers on an accelerated
basis.  We feel that this can be best achieved by pursuing entertainment
on-demand independently.

We intend to initiate discussions with various content providers for
delivering their content over the Enron platform.  We remain very positive
about the potential of this business for EBS and Enron and will keep you
apprised of our progress.


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dattani, Nayan
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:48 PM
To:	Nommensen, Dave; Wei, Zhiyong; Fortney, Bill; Swaim, Michael; Farooqi, Ahmad; Kasaru, Narasim
Cc:	Severson, Russ; Ames, Chuck; Grant, George
Subject:	New position manager in Test & parallel

  New Position manager ie out in test & parallel

  1) Expandable totals for Cash position's

Nayan
x - 57163


Yes, for the time being until we get someone in Alan's group.  Mark

	Jordan Mintz/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/22/2001 09:18 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: (BN  ) AIG Declines to Pay Flashpoint Bonds, Triggers 18-Not

Mark: Who should I contact regarding legal coverage for this project?
Insurance--Lou Stoler?
Jordan

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Glisan, Ben
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 7:23 AM
To: Fastow, Andrew S.; Kopper, Michael; Deffner, Joseph; Schnapper, Barry;
Brown, Bill W.; Chivers, Paul; Howard, Kevin; Lipshutz, Cheryl; Thirsk,
Jeremy; Mintz, Jordan; DeSpain, Tim
Subject: FW: (BN  ) AIG Declines to Pay Flashpoint Bonds, Triggers 18-Not

All:

Be careful of paying for insurance wraps.  Lots of noise in the system about
insurance companies not paying.  I met with Chase last week and their credit
guys expressed extreme skepticism over the efficacy of insurance wraps.

Tim: Talk to the market to ensure that our A1/P1 facility is still viewed as
an A1/P1 risk.

Joe & Jordan: Scrub down the credit reserve policy, we need to make certain
that we are in absolute compliance with the documents.  If not we need to
clean up the documentation ASAP (it seems highly unlikely that we would not
be making significant claims under that policy this year).

Ben
----- Forwarded by Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2001 07:21 AM -----

	Barry Schnapper@ENRON 02/13/2001 03:12 PM 	   To: Ben Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:   Subject: FW: (BN  ) AIG Declines to Pay Flashpoint Bonds, Triggers
18-Not

fyi
----- Forwarded by Barry Schnapper/Corp/Enron on 02/13/2001 03:12 PM -----

	Sarah Wesner/ENRON@enronXgate 02/13/2001 02:20 PM 	   To:
dblack1@enron.com@SMTP@enronXgate, Brad Blesie/Corp/Enron@ENRON  cc: Charles
Delacey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry Schnapper/Corp/Enron@Enron  Subject: FW: (BN  )
AIG Declines to Pay Flashpoint Bonds, Triggers 18-Not

Following is the article menioned in yesterday's meeting.

AIG Declines to Pay Flashpoint Bonds, Triggers 18-Notch S&P Cut
2/8/1 13:3 (New York)

AIG Declines to Pay Flashpoint Bonds, Triggers 18-Notch S&P Cut

     London, Feb. 8 (Bloomberg) -- A pair of ``AAA''-rated bonds
issued by Flashpoint Ltd. suffered an 18-notch downgrade by
Standard & Poor's after a unit of American International Group
Inc. said it won't pay on insurance that guarantees the bonds.
     The $149.1 million of bonds, named Hollywood Funding No. 5.
and No. 6, were sold by the U.K. company to finance films and
television shows. S&P assigned its top rating to the securities
because they're guaranteed by Lexington Insurance Co., a
subsidiary of AIG, the world's largest insurer.
     Investors who bought the zero-coupon bonds were to be repaid
by the revenue from a basket of films. When the films didn't make
enough to cover those payments, the insurance policy was designed
to kick in. Lexington, though, said it won't cover the shortfall
because the film company broke its contract. Now, S&P regards the
bonds as ``vulnerable to nonpayment,'' and rates them ``CCC-.''
     ``There has never been a downgrade of that magnitude in
Europe,'' said Kurt Sampson, head of structured finance ratings
at S&P. ``We are voicing our concern about the implications for
the capital markets. The degree of our concern is evident by the
fact we are going public with this.''
     S&P, which downgraded the Hollywood bonds on Friday, said
Lexington's actions have prompted it to review other securities
insured by Lexington in case the insurer seeks to ``raise
defenses to the payment'' due on other bonds.
     Joe Norton, AIG's spokesman, said the company won't comment
on the bonds. Graham Johnson at Flagship Group, which handles
press communications for Flashpoint, said the company regards the
bonds as ``not a matter that it's appropriate for them to comment
on.'' Credit Suisse First Boston, which managed the private sale
of Flashpoint's six Hollywood Funding bonds, also declined to
comment.

                         Cash Shortfall

     Hollywood Funding No. 5, a $48.4 million dollar bond, was
due to be repaid on Jan. 5, according to people familiar with the
security. Bondholders haven't been paid, and agreed to wait for
two months before triggering a default because Lexington is
investigating whether the issuer broke its contract with the
insurer, S&P said.
     ``The policies were to provide for sufficient funds to pay
the notes in full, should revenues in the trustee's other
accounts be insufficient,'' S&P said. ``S&P believed that the
original policies'' would pay out under any circumstances, ``and
that any such matters were not supposed to constitute a defense
to payment on the policies.''
     S&P's defines ``AAA'' ratings as those applying to issuers
with an ``extremely strong'' ability to meet their obligations.
     The rating company also said that Lexington won't be meeting
shortfalls on Hollywood Funding No. 6, a $100.7 million bond
maturing on June 18, because the issuer broke its contract by not
making as many films at it agreed to.

--Alice James in the London newsroom (44) 207 330 7195, or
ajames@bloomberg.net, with reporting by Sean Farrell /mg

Story illustration: {HOLFUN 0 6/18/01 <Corp> DES <GO>} for the
terms of one of the bonds.

NI CRA    NI BON    NI EBN    NI ABS    NI INS    NI RED
NI COR    NI FILM   NI TV     NI ENT    NI LAW    NI ENH
NI EUB    NI PVT    NI WIN

AIG US <Equity> CN
-0- (BN ) Feb/08/2001 18:03 GMT


FYI, We are addressing this today.  Grigsby knows they are pissed and he knows that I am pissed.  If they expect me to continue to sell products involving service from their desk, and they get paid for that service, they are going to have to do a better job.  Citizens isn't the only one that I feel has service issues from the desk.

-----Original Message-----
From: Foster, Chris H.
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:49 PM
To: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject: FW: Griffith Sales

Kim:

I know you cannot control this.  If we can say anything to give our side of the story, we should.  Grigsby should know that the customer is a little pissed.

C
-----Original Message-----
From: Breen, Sean [mailto:SBreen@czn.com]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:48 AM
To: Foster, Chris H.; Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject: Griffith Sales

As I have discussed with you, Citizens is concerned about the frequency of upstream supply issues that have resulted in the recent cuts in the deliveries to the Griffith power plant.  Based on the information I have received, the reasons for these cuts have not risen to the level of Force Majeure, which as you know is the only event that would excuse performance under our contract for firm delivery of gas.  Citizens therefore requests that Enron respond to Citizens in writing with a descriptions of the steps Enron is taking to insure that there is not a continuation of these contract performance issues into the future. Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated.


Stinson,

Did you have the chance to audit the UK vol generator?

Vince


Daren:

On 1/25/2000 the above meter has recorded flow of 18 Mmbtus into HPL's
pipeline.  Currently, the volume is booked to HPL Strangers Gas Contract.
Logistics needs approval to write-off this volume to Unaccounted for Gas.
(Please print, sign, and return original to Clem Cernosek).

 ________________________________________________________________
 APPROVAL to Write-off the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss

The above meter was a new meter effective 1/1/2000, and therefore, the volume
flowing into HPL was probably caused by putting the meter in service.

Thanks, Clem


no relation

that clip isn't the full one though.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:19 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE:

how does that relate?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:19 AM
To: JHawker@petersco.com
Subject: RE:

any interest in a chapter's visit sometime soon?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:14 AM
   To:     Richey, Cooper
   Subject:

   I love the outfit dude.  Check the glasses (reflection).

   Jai Hawker
   403-261-2259
   Peters & Co. Limited

    - cartcop1.mov << File: cartcop1.mov >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


I apologize for not putting the date of this interview.  For everyone but
Tanya and Paulo, the interview time is already entered on your calendars for
August 11, 2000.  Again, sorry for the oversite.
---------------------- Forwarded by Anita DuPont/NA/Enron on 08/01/2000 09:16
AM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner@ECT
08/01/2000 09:12 AM
To: Anita DuPont/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Interview with Research Dept. Candidate Rabi S. De

On which day are the interviews?

Anita DuPont@ENRON
07/31/2000 03:49 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant
Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Interview with Research Dept. Candidate Rabi S. De

The following interview schedule has been set up for Rabi S. De by Sean
Grady, HR Staffing:

9:00 - 9:30 AM Vince Kaminiski

9:30 - 10:00 AM Stinson Gibner

10:00 - 10:30 AM Grant Masson

10:30 - 11:00 AM Krishna Krishnarao

11:00 - 11:30 AM Tanya Tamarchenko

11: 30 - 1:00 PM Lunch with Tanya Tamarchenko and Zimin Lu

1:00 - 1:30 PM Zimin Lu

1:30 - 2:00 PM Vasant Shanbhogue

2:00 - 2:30 PM Paulo Issler

Please call me if you have any questions or if a conflict develops and you
need to change your interview time.  Thanks.  Anita


May you be forced to spend eternity with David Lazarus....

P.S. I'm taking next week off.  I'll be in the Middle East for martyr
training.

Best,
Jeff

	Mark Palmer
	07/06/2001 12:15 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Dunn Subpoena

It's just that I can't begin to imagine a better or more noble spokesman,
especially portrayed in the light of a martyr, than you.  Will you wear the
shirt?  I think the camera loves it.

Mark


Group,
Effective October 1st...BPA transmission will be the following prices...

BPA non-firm point to point (or network) will be $2.92 with 1.9% losses

BPA non-firm on the intertie will be $3.34 with 3% losses

Losses could be expected to add up to $5 of the total price--do not put losses into the purchase from BPA Transmission in Enpower--losses for BPA will be settled at the end of the month in a single annuity.

Total price for MPC to CAISO at MALIN on BPA non-firm all the way will be $6.26
Total price for MPC to CAISO at NOB on BPA NON-FIRM all the way will be $6.26--Remember to check tranny sheet for PGE-tranny availability--WE HAVE NO MORE LT FIRM FROM BIG EDDY TO NOB--

SNOPud is charging $3.25 for point to point plus 1.9% losses.

Bill


Please read the following and let me know if you have any suggestions.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000
12:01 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shona Wilson @ ENRON                           11/30/2000 10:35 AM

To: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kathy
Reeves/CAL/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Scott
Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt A Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Maxwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clara Carrington/HOU/ECT@ECT, James New/LON/ECT@ECT,
Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Heidi
Mason/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jan-Erland Bekeng/AP/Enron@Enron,
Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Warren Prihoda/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Meredith
M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Burton McIntyre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: daily reporting to Rick Buy

Rick Buy has requested that he receive the log of the book officialization
errors on a daily basis.  Previously, he was only receiving it weekly.
Because of this change, it will be necessary for risk contols to have a
complete explanation from your risk groups as to why errors happened.

The current process is as follows for Houston (using Houston time):
Books officialized in evening by risk management
7:30 am risk controls receives error listing (books which did not make it to
RisktRAC)
7:30 - 8:30 explanations obtained for error received from risk management
(Not all explanations are obtained by 8:30)
8:30 meeting to discuss previous night's officialization process and general
processes
9:00 close obtain explanations not obtained before meeting
Wed pm - weekly consolidated report sent to business controllers and RAC

The process needs to change so that we receive all explanations before the
8:30 meeting.  I know that many groups identify errors the night before via
the benchmark or reviews of RisktRAC.  Hopefully, all groups are moving in
this direction.  Since the log will go out each day, each of you need to look
at the current process you have in place and determine how you can get us the
information prior to the 8:30 meeting.

We are trying to put the following process in place (for Houston):
Books officialized in evening by risk management including risk management
ensuring RisktRAC has all required information, errors noted and an e-mail
sent to risk controls
7:30 am risk controls receives error listing (books which did not make it to
RisktRAC)
7:30 - 8:30 explanations obtained for error received from risk management (if
not received the night before) and log updated
8:30 meeting to discuss previous night's officialization process and general
processes
Log sent to bus. controllers, RAC - daily

Note:  I know that London, Sydney, and Japan have different processes.  We
have to work with your current processes to ensure that risk controls
receives info on time.


We have conference room 6716 from 3:00 to 4:00 each day for OPS.  I have not inspected the room to see if it will accommodate our entire group.

Thanks,
Mike


FYI - I have not received any forwards or puts from CSFB.  Have you heard anything further?  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Freeland, Clint
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:33 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara; Nogid, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Revised Total Retun Confirmation

We provided CSFB puts just like Lehman.  We did that the last time we had to move the trigger price since our stock price was declining.  As a result of us giving them puts, they took the trigger price out which means that we don't have to renegotiate the confirms every time our stock heads south.  Jeff, would you please get the details of the puts to Sara.  Thanks.
CF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:24 PM
To:	Freeland, Clint; Nogid, Jeff
Subject:	FW: Revised Total Retun Confirmation

Per my voice mail

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Emerson, Michael" <michael.emerson@csfb.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Haratunian, Stephen
Subject:	RE: Revised Total Retun Confirmation

Sara-

We will prepare execution copies of the confirmations for the various
transactions and send them to you.  Before we do that, though, do you know
the status of the puts [Shackleton, Sara]   I never heard mention of the puts ?

Regards,

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Shackleton, Sara [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:56 AM
To: "Chiodi, Maria" <maria.chiodi@csfb.com>@ENRON; Armogida, Jim
Cc: Emerson, Michael; Haratunian, Stephen; Armogida, Jim
Subject: RE: Revised Total Retun Confirmation

Maria and Michael:

The form of confirmation of fine.  How would you like to handle
execution of this transaction?  of remaining transactions?  Scheduling
the VE discussion for later this week is also acceptable.  We look
forward to hearing from you.  Regards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	"Chiodi, Maria" <maria.chiodi@csfb.com>@ENRON
> [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Chiodi+2C+20Maria+22+20+3Cmaria+2Echiodi+40csfb+
> 2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:58 PM
> To:	Armogida, Jim; Shackleton, Sara
> Cc:	Emerson, Michael; Haratunian, Stephen
> Subject:	Revised Total Retun Confirmation
>
> Jim and Sara:
>
> As we discussed, I attach a revised copy of the confirmation that is
> marked
> to show changes made to our June 27th draft.
>
> Regards,
>
> > 	Maria Chiodi
> > 	Legal and Compliance Department
> > 	CREDIT | FIRST
> > 	SUISSE | BOSTON
> > 	Phone: 212-325-6724
> > 	Fax: 917-326-7763
> >
> >
>  <<TRS Oct 4 2001 CSFB Draft.doc>>
>
> This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
> If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
> all
> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and
> notify the
> sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
> distribute,
> print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
> recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each
> reserve
> the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.
> Any
> views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
> except
> where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to
> state
> them to be the views of any such entity.
> Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message
> is
> indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer
> to
> deal at any price quoted.
> Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated
> as
> preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.
>
>
>
>
>  - TRS Oct 4 2001 CSFB Draft.doc << File: TRS Oct 4 2001 CSFB
> Draft.doc >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.


Hey, how's things? Long time not chat.  What's up?  Anywho, you seem like the
right person to respond to this email.  (And I have no idea.)

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 10:44 AM -----

	Catherine McKalip-Thompson@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	02/26/2001 09:14 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: question for you

Jeff,
I'd meant to stop in your office today to ask you about this in person, but
you seemed rather busy whenever I went by.  Now I'll be out for awhile so am
sending you this note instead.

I got a call from KKSF who is putting on an Earth Day Jazz concert at the
Chronicle (Concord) Pavillion on 4/29 asking if we are interested in
sponsoring the vent, expected to draw 20,000 Northern Calif consumers with a
high income/education demographic.  In addition to signage, display
opportunities, etc. there is the opportunity for a feature story on CNET
Radio for promotion of companies' involvement in the community (energy
efficiency, quality of life whatever).
Previous sponsors of interst are PG&E, Green Mountain, and the Renewable
Energy Marketing Board.

My question for you is whether Enron would be interested in the opportunity
for positive PR here in CA, or whether we are trying to keep a low profile.
Is an opportunity like this something any part of Enron (EES included) would
be interested in?

Thanks for advising.
Catherine

Catherine McKalip-Thompson
Manager, Environmental Responsibility
Enron Corp.
101 California Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: 415.782.7842
Fax: 415.782.7854


?
Panalytix,?Inc.?Releases APeX Version 4.0

3-Click Calibration, Pricing and Hedging -  Calibrate, price, and hedge any
exotic (e.g., Bermudan Cancelable Swap) using  any model (Multi-Factor HJM,
BK, Hull-White) with 3 easy clicks.
Bloomberg Alliance - Access Live feeds  provided via Open Bloomberg.? New
mechanism accesses any Excel-compatible  OLE/DDE source for live feeds
(Bloomberg, Reuters/TibCo, Bridge).
New Performance Benchmarks -?4.5  seconds to calibrate and price a Bermudan
10nc2 using 2-Factor 1000-path HJM  model on a 500MHz/128MB Pentium.

APeX Version 4.1featuring  Multi-Currency Multi-Factor HJM is in Beta
release.
?
For more information and the?new Downloadable  Demo of APeX 4.0, please visit
our website at http://www.panalytix.com/news.html.?  For sales information,
or to arrange for a presentation of  APeX, please contact Barbara Brandfass,
212 974-1022, b@panalytix.com.
?