Matthew, if you know my reputation, I tend not to be a big fan of these type
of events either - however, at this point, I need to collect more information
on the event and I think it inappropriate to cancel at this late stage.
Going forward, I think we as a management team including yourself should
discuss what the strategy should be going forward.

Don't hesitate to voice your opinion.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001
08:52 AM ---------------------------

Matthew Scrimshaw
02/12/2001 02:24 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EES Pinnacle Event

Dave/Janet,

As you guys like a no bullshit approach, last Fall, I voiced my concerns to
the EES management team about the second Pinnacle event (see link below).

http://pinnacle2001.proghq.com/index.html

My concerns in no particular order were:

1) Given that we have a generous bonus programme to reward staff, I felt the
need for such an over the top event like an all expenses paid holiday in the
West Indies for "key" staff and their spouses was unnecessary.
2) The lack of transparent selection criteria ("selected Superior and
Excellent performers") was devisive would inevitably piss off the vast
majority of EES who didn't go on the trip.
3) Apart from disagreeing with the whole idea, I disagreed with the fact that
all the MDs automatically got to go as that implied they were all performing
and deserved it.
4) I didn't believe that, overall, the business was making enough money to
justify a "reward"  trip like this.
5) I didn't want to take my best guys out of the office for up to a week as
we have a lot of work to do and won't make the numbers sat on a beach
6) The Europe wide Enron team works well together and there would be no way
of justifying this trip to the rest of the London office (non EES) who
obviously would see it for what it is - a waste of time and money

Tom conceded by saying that this one would probably be the last event of its
kind.  Others remained silent.

I withdrew Europe from the event on the grounds that culturally in Europe
this event was unacceptable.  Stephen Peterson (in the Europe team)  appears
on the list of attendees, but will not attend for the reasons outlined above
and he is OK with it.  Afterwards, I found out that McCarty boycotted the
first event the year before for the same reasons.

Whatever you guys decide to do, Europe remains committed to hitting the
numbers and being part of the team.

Matthew


Sorry Emily.  I usually just type "ALLW" to get Robert.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 11:19
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
11/20/2000 11:19 AM
To: Kimat Singla/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crystal Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kulvinder
Fowler/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Emily
Allwardt/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Bay State deal 418282

I deleted 2 meters from deal 418282 for 12/1/2000 - 3/31/2001.  Please make
sure the risk assignment is still ok.

Thanks


Below is the Bison Presentation.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sumner-Kenney, Martha
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 12:16 PM
To:	Miller, Paul
Subject:	PowerPoint Presentation
Importance:	High

Here is the presentation

Martha Sumner Kenney
Manager, Community Relations
(402) 398-7804

An ugly carpet will last forever.
-Erma Bombeck


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000
06:48 PM ---------------------------

webmaster@cera.com on 07/14/2000 10:21:29 PM
To: vince.j.kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Monthly Briefing: Refined Products Line - CERA Alert

**********************************************************************
CERA Alert: Sent Fri, July 14, 2000
**********************************************************************

Title: Monthly Briefing: Refined Products Line
Author: Refined Products Team
E-Mail Category: Alert
Product Line: Refined Products ,
URL: http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/eprofile.cfm?u=5166&m=1273 ,

Although demand currently lags last year's level, gasoline margins remain
exceptionally strong owing in large part to the tight supply situation;
gasoline price differentials gained $0.46 per barrel during June, rising to
$8.58 per barrel over WTI. Distillate market fundamentals remain very strong
and CERA expects margins to continue strengthening through the third quarter.
High natural gas prices have raised the ceiling on low-sulfur residual fuel
prices, so that 1% sulfur residual fuel differentials below WTI have narrowed
from the $7.00)$8.00 per barrel range of the first quarter to $4.18 per
barrel during June.

**end**

Follow URL for complete Monthly Briefing.
Note: Should the above URL not work, please use the following:
http://www.cera.com/client/rp/alt/071400_18/rp_alt_071400_18_ab.html

**********************************************************************
Account Changes
To edit your personal account information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://eprofile.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


_________________________________________________________________

            B R E A K F A S T   W I T H   T H E   F O O L
                      Friday, December 1, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223137
_________________________________________________________________

 Sponsored By: BUYandHOLD
 Hey Fool! Want to know the SECRET to long-term investing?
 Compounding and dollar-cost averaging! Start investing with
 as little as $20! Just $2.99 per order.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=223138

"Why not go out on a limb? That's where the fruit is."
--Mark Twain

PEPSI COURTING QUAKER, AGAIN
Quaker Oats and Pepsi are talking once more, but will the
outcome be the same?

By Mike Trigg

The Quaker Oats (NYSE: OAT) story took another spin yesterday,
when the world's second-largest soft drink company, PepsiCo
(NYSE: PEP), resumed talks to purchase the maker of Gatorade for
$14.3 billion. Not long ago, similar discussions were brought to
a halt after Quaker rejected Pepsi's offer, citing a dispute in
price.

The story with Quaker is an interesting one. After similar talks
with Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) and French food conglomerate Groupe
Danone (NSYE: DA) failed to materialize, investors are left to
ask: Is this time for real?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223139

According to The Wall Street Journal, the two sides appear close
to agreement, with the deal potentially wrapping up in the next
couple of days. If the two sides in fact do reach agreement, an
announcement would be made Monday morning. Both companies have
planned board meetings for this Saturday.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=223140

Apparently, the proposed deal is no different than the last.
Quaker Oats shareholders would receive 2.3 shares of Pepsi
stock, valued at $104.36, based on Pepsi's closing price of
$43.38 yesterday. That's a 27% premium to Quaker Oats, stock
price as of November 2, the day original talks were made public.
Pepsi hasn't offered a "collar" -- the original deal breaker --
to Quaker, which is a form of price protection that fixes a
price within a set limit of how far the buyer's shares can rise
or fall. The same Wall Street Journal article reports that an
arrangement is being negotiated that would allow Quaker to
abandon the deal if the value provided to Quaker shareholders
became less than $90 per share upon closing.

If the deal does go through this time around Pepsi would surpass
Coca-Cola as the leader in the non-carbonated U.S drinks market,
holding nearly one-third of the market, compared to Coca-Cola's
21%. According to the Street, Pepsi would also be able to jump
start sales of Quaker Chewy Granola bars, selling them through
its Frito-Lay food division.
_________________________________________________________________

NEWS TO GO

Information transfer device maker Crossroads Systems (Nasdaq:
CRDS) announced better-than-expected third-quarter results after
the market's close yesterday, reporting a net loss (excluding
goodwill and stock compensation) of $4.8 million, or $0.18 per
share, compared to a loss of $870,000, or $0.04 per share, in
the year-ago period. The Street consensus called for the company
to lose $0.21 per share. Crossroads, top line came in at $8.4
million, an 18% increase year-over-year.

Discount airline company Cheap Tickets (Nasdaq: CTIX) announced
that CFO Dale Jorgensen plans on retiring in February. Jorgenson
will remain with the company after his retirement to aid in the
transition and provide assistance on certain projects. ``While
my time with Cheap Tickets has been very rewarding, I have
decided to devote more time to my family and other personal
interests. I am very pleased to have been part of the progress
the company has made moving into the public market and see a
great future for Cheap Tickets' unique multi-channel revenue and
distribution model,'' said Jorgensen.

Carbon dioxide seller Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (NYSE: KMP)
announced a deal with GATX Corp. (NYSE: GMT) to purchase two oil
product pipelines and 12 storage terminals for $1.15 billion in
cash and debt. Kinder Morgan Partners Chairman and CEO Richard
Kinder estimated the deal would increase earnings per share
between $1.62 and $1.75 in 2001, with the Street consensus
calling for the company to earn between $1.50 and $1.62 a share
in the coming year. The deal is expected to close in the first
quarter of next year.

Heating and cooling products provider Modine Manufacturing
(Nasdaq: MODI) announced that it was revising earnings and sales
forecasts for its third quarter and the full fiscal year (ends
March 31, 2001). The Racine, Wisconsin-based company expects
third-quarter revenue to be down 10% to 13% and earnings 55% to
65%. For the full year, sales should be down 7% to 10% with
earnings dropping between 25% and 30%. The company cited a weak
euro and lower sales in the heavy-truck and light-vehicle
markets. Modine earned $2.20 per share in the previous year.

Steel processing company Worthington Industries (NYSE: WOR)
announced that its second-quarter (ended yesterday) earnings
would fall short of expectations and that it had halted its
proposed $300 million acquisition of three Pennsylvania limited
partnerships: MetalTech, NexTech, and GalvTech. The company said
earnings would be substantially lower than the $0.15 per share
it posted in the previous quarter and that the full-year Street
earnings expectation of $1.07 was unrealistic. The Street
consensus called for the company to earn $0.22 per share in the
second quarter. The company cited the weakness in several of its
business, including its steel-processed products operations.
_________________________________________________________________

EDITORS' PICK

Gene Logic CEO Mark Gessler talks about the fascinating things
the company will be able to accomplish via human-genome mining.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223141
_______________________________________________________________

-News & Commentary
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223142

-Fool Community
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223143

-Post of the Day
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223144

-Latest Fribble
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223145

-Latest Market Numbers
 http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223146
____________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223147
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223148
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223149
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223150
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223151

 Sponsored By: BUYandHOLD
 Hey Fool! Want to know the SECRET to long-term investing?
 Compounding and dollar-cost averaging! Start investing with
 as little as $20! Just $2.99 per order.
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=223152

17 INDUSTRIES WORTH A LOOK
 See which industries our writers think
 will be hot next year with Industry Focus 2001.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=223153

TEN SECRETS TO RETIRING EARLY
 Read a free preview of this report on Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=223154

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>

Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=223155
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

.

MsgId:
msg-27276-2000-12-01_9-40-43-348432_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:45:25(12-01-
2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Please let me know if you have any questions.
thanks
ekw
ext 36162


I've forwarded this e-mail to Christian and Greg. Unfortunately, the
population of the office is quickly dwindling as the holidays come near. I've
been told that one or the other of them will be in today, and I'll find out
if something has been sent out already, and if not, how soon we can do that.
I'll get back to you as soon as I talk to them.

Thanks,
Kate

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
12/20/2000 07:30 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Hinson Power Company, Inc.

Hi Kate,
Deals #478168, 478944, 478945, 478946 are to be confirmed by either Greg
Wolfe or Christian Yoder.  We need to get the final copy of these confirm
letters so we can scan them into the system for our files.  Also, if the
finalized confirm has been sent to the counterparty we need to change the
status in the system.  These deals are still showing up on our "New" report
every morning and I need to do something with them.
Thanks for your help!
Kim


Yes, you are correct.  The SLP interest will be hedged at the same levels as
the GP interest.

avr

Gordon McKillop@ENRON
08/30/2000 03:31 PM
To: Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Raptor Hedges

Andrea:
I wanted to double check that the interest going into Raptor is ENA's and
SLP's interest in JEDI.  Please let me know if this is correct.
Thanks,
Gordon
---------------------- Forwarded by Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron on 08/30/2000
03:22 PM ---------------------------

Scott Sefton@ECT
08/30/2000 01:38 PM
To: Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ryan Siurek/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Trushar
Patel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Raptor Hedges

I thought I'd communicate to the group some recent developments.

1. Gordon and Ryan advise that the swaps for assets in JEDI 1 and 2 will
cover our proportionate economic interest in the asset within JEDI. Gordon
believes the spreadsheet of proposed swaps reflects this. The swap will be
between Harrier and Talon and there will be no back-to-back swap with JEDI.
There should be no required disclosures to CalPERS resulting from these
hedges.

2. Gordon and Ryan advise that for assets currently on our balance sheet that
are hedged with Raptor and then sold to Condor,  there will be no reduction
in the hedge or any back-to-back hedge when it moves into Condor. The swap
will be between Harrier and Talon.

3. Mark Taylor and Bob Baird have concluded that the swaps can be terminable
by Harrier if the underlying security is sold.


Start Date: 1/29/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012923.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/21/2000
04:49 PM ---------------------------

"Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk> on 04/20/2000 04:32:32 AM
Please respond to "Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk>
To: "VinceJKaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: "Julie" <julie@lacima.co.uk>
Subject: Book and EPRM articles

Hi Vince,
?
I was wondering how the chapter of the book is coming along??! Do you want
me to make 'noise' tomorrow or to leave you until after Easter?
?
Until then, I wanted to discuss with you an idea  that Les and I have been
throwing around concerning writing a series of articles  for Risk's 'Energy
and Power Risk Management'. We would like to propose to  them?that we would
write an article a month, covering practical issues  dealing with energy
modelling and energy derivative pricing and risk management.  The articles
would be based upon sections of the book so as to promote the book,  and to
reduce the effort/time involved by using?already produced material.  We would
like to cover some very practical topics, but we?won't be giving  too much
away as the articles are only 1 or 2 pages long.
?
Each article would be of?the  form;
?
- introduce?the concept
- give an example using real data
- discuss the problem with a case study?
- provide a discussion
- sum up
?
I've included a list of potential articles at the  end of this e-mail. For
example, for the first one,  "Estimation of mean reversion in spot energy
prices", we would introduce  the concept of mean reversion,?show a graph of
an equity index and an  energy price?for illustration of our point, estimate
the parameter for a  series of energies over a number of seasons, and
finally, discuss the  results.
?
We?are wondering if you would like to be  involved in this project? Your
involvement needn't take much time (although it  is up to you). The kind of
input we are hoping for (again, this is up to you) is  that you?would?review
the list of articles and  provide?suggestions of additions or deletions,
suggest reasonable data sets  or case studies to work with on each article,
and then to run your eye over  "near finished" articles, which?we would
supply to you for  your?practical experience?input.? Would something like
this  interest you? If it did, we would try to sell Risk on making it a
regular  monthly "feature" of EPRM, authored by all three of us.
?
We are hoping to present our proposal to Risk in  the next few weeks, so
please let us know if you are interested.
?
Best regards.
?
Chris.
?
?
Potental EPRM articles;
?
1- Estimation of mean reversion in spot energy  prices (with parameters
estimated for oil, gas, and electricity data over  different seasons)
?
2- Estimation of jumps in spot energy prices (with  parameters estimated for
oil, gas, and electricity data over different  seasons)
?
3- Simulating a mean reverting spot price process  for pricing energy
derivatives (with case study applied to an Asian option on  oil)
?
4- Simulating a jump / diffusion spot price process  for pricing energy
derivatives (with case study applied to a Swaption on natural  gas)
?
5- Simulating a mean reverting jump / diffusion  spot price process for
pricing energy derivatives (with case study applied to  hourly caps on spot
electricity)
?
6- An analytical pricing formula for pricing caps  in a mean reverting spot
price model (with example applied to a cap on natural  gas fitting the
Forward curve and volatlity structure)
?
7- using a tree consistent with the forward curve  and vols for pricing swing
options
?
8- implying a single?factor vol function from  market Futures option prices
and variation of parameters thru time
?
9- adding jump volatility to the tree
?
10- An analytical pricing formula for pricing caps  in a multi-factor forward
curve model(with example applied to the same cap on  natural gas and a
discussion on the differences between the two  approaches)
?
11- Estimating volatility functions for  multi-factor forward curve models
(with estimates of oil data over different  periods)
?
12- Estimating volatility functions for  multi-factor forward curve model
from market option prices
?
13- pricing swing option in multi factor model  using tree for exercise
strategy
?
14- comparison of VaR methodoligies applied to the  same energy derivativ
portfolio.
?


Here it is.   Please let me know if you need anything else!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Kim:
Rod has asked me to fill in for him at a 9:00 meeting with Stan and Dan.  Can we move this to 10:00?

Thanks,
Kevin


Scott,

I spoke briefly with Edith Terry from our DC office. There is not a good fit
for my group
but she could be a great asset for you.

I have her resume in case you are hiring and  would like to take a look at
her.

Vince


The request has been completed with all resources requested either completed
or rejected. You can view the details of the  request by clicking
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000034939&Page=
MyReq.


Brant,  Attached are the Master Firm agreement that Debra prepared based on
your credit worksheet.  I removed the form of Guaranty since we use a
different form for the Bridgeline Holdings, L.P.   and I wasn't sure if we
would need a JV guaranty for any of these deals.

Please review and let me know if you have any questions.


I still have not received a copy of this.

	Becky Stephens@ENRON
	10/03/2000 04:44 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bonnie White/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: service of process

The following original documents, received today, have been forwarded for
your immediate review and consideration:

Webb County, et al. v. Mr. Sergio Delgado in his capacity as Chief Appraiser
for Webb County and the Webb County Appraisal District, et al. (including
Houston Pipe Line Company); No. 2000CVQ000819D2, In the 111th Judicial
District Court, Webb County, Texas.  CITATION and PETITION FOR REVIEW to
Houston Pipe Line Company by certified mail on 10/2/00.

PLEASE ADVISE IF NOT RECEIVED WITHIN 1 BUSINESS DAY.

Thank you !!

Becky A. Stephens
Litigation Unit, Support Services Coordinator
713/853-5025
EB4809


Please be advised that as of this moment there will not be a conference call
for this Friday, June 16th.  I will notify everyone via email when a call is
set for sure. I will also give you the pincode for that call (which will be
the same as last Friday - dial in 800-998-2462 pincode 4309724).

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions.

Thanks
Twanda
713-853-9402


Here's what Eric wrote:

I revised the contract you sent me to make it site specific.  Those changes
are redlined.  Please note that I have reinserted sections 10.4.1 and 10.4.3
as well as the defined terms that go with them.  These were related to
exhaust temperature and energy.  I know this is a simple cycle plant and they
typically aren't required, but I wanted to see if GE would guarantee it
anyway.  It maybe helpful in the future if Austin Energy goes combined
cycle.  If for some reason GE's lawyers specifically want to leave that out,
then they will probably also want to delete sections 10.4.2 and 10.4.4 (and
their defined terms) since those also talk about specific exhaust
guarantees.  Let me know what they decide.

Exhibit A (site basis conditions) which I also revised was not attached to
your file.  (It's right behind the sign-off pages in my hard copy.)  I
therefor hand marked up a copy and scanned it.  It is now attached as a
separate word file.

Exhibit F is "boiler plate" and shouldn't change.  Exhibit "U" is not in my
hard copy.  My copy only goes up to Exhibit "T."   If you get something from
GE on Exhibit "U", send it to me and I will be glad to review it.


I will be getting out my Rice application on Tuesday the 21st, so if your
able to complete the recommendation form before or on Tuesday I would greatly
appreciate it.  I leave for a Christmas vacation on Wednesday and wanted to
get it out before I left.  Thanks again for taking the time to write this
recommendation for me.
Ben


Great to hear from you.  Things have been going well in Houston.  Lisa is
working for Johnson Controls.
It must be a long time since we've talked b/c she's been with Johnson for
about 5 months.  I love my
new job - I'm trading gas up in the Midwest market area - Illinois and
Michigan.  Things have been
incredibly busy.

The wedding plans have changed considerably.  As I'm sure you can relate to,
the stress of planning
combined with the input of so many others have made us decide to have a
wedding with only our folks
there and not even have a reception.   We figured we could put the money
toward a house and save
a lot of anger, frustration and stress.

How's the job, new house, and Terri doing?  Have you been to many Bears
games?  The Scarlet Knights
have been so inconsistent this year.  I think a lot is due to their youth.

Let's talk soon.

Kevin


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<title>VentureWire People</title>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1">

	Published by Technologic Partners

    EXECUTIVE CHANGES FOR  Tuesday, September 04, 2001

WHO'S HIRING

TopicalNet of Woburn, Mass.
By Giselle Greenwood
After inking a European distribution deal with Bertelsmann and acquiring Internet Profiles (I/Pro), TopicalNet, a provider of automated content classification technology for B2B applications, is looking to add senior sales people, including a senior vice president of sales and and a SVP for its applications group.

CEO Ray Kingman says the company's technology was significantly expanded after the acquisition of I/Pro, a provider of Web site measurement, advanced customer analytics, and online audit services, even though the company hasn't commercially launched its products yet.>>

EXECUTIVE SEARCHES
• MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER-BAY AREA OR NYC-BOS CORRIDOR
• VICE PRESIDENT CUSTOMER ENGINEERING (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)-S. SAN FRANCISCO

        		CEO HIRES

        		LINKS

        		• sponsor VentureWire people

    			• place a classified ad

    		• refer VentureWire

    		• send news

    		• FAQ

    		YOUR ACCOUNT

    		• change e-mail

    		• cancel VentureWire people

    		• feedback

    		• this newsletter
  mailed to you at:
 jdasovic@ENRON.COM

    		SERVICES

    		• VentureWire index

    		UPCOMING EVENTS

    		• Outlook Conferences

    		Venture Capital community and industry executives come together!

		San Francisco
September 10 & 11

TOP MANAGEMENT

• AccessLan Names Ofer Doitel President and CEO

• Aviva Biosciences Names Peter Wilding President and CEO

VC PERSONNEL

• Bush to Nominate Founder of Trident Capital as Envoy to EU

• PwC Venture Partners Adds Michael Jonovski to Team

MARKETING & SALES

• Racemi Names RF Solutions CEO Steve Richeson as Mrktg. VP

OPERATIONS

• Peace Software Names Derek Van Keuren as HR Vice President

	TOP MANAGEMENT

• AccessLan Names Ofer Doitel President and CEO

SAN JOSE, CALIF.      -- AccessLan Communications, which provides IP-enabled access provisioning, announced its appointment of founder and chairman, Ofer Doital, as president and CEO.

Mr. Doital, who also continues as chairman, replaces Michael Pisterzi, who has stepped down from the company.

The company's board members are Peter Cross, business and engineering advisor to AccessLan and formerly senior vice president of engineering at Bay Networks; Sean Dalton, general partner at Highland Capital; Bob Hower, partner at BancBoston Ventures; and Andrew Ludwick, business adviser to AccessLan, co-founder of SynOptics, and formerly president and CEO of Bay Networks/SynOptics.

AccessLan has raised over $90 million in financing from  Accel Partners, Advanced Fibre
Communications, AV Labs, BancBoston Ventures, Berkeley International Capital, Highland Capital, The Ignite Group, Intel Capital, NIF Ventures, Peery Capital, Sequoia Capital, and Tudor Private Equity Fund.

http://www.accesslan.com

• Aviva Biosciences Names Peter Wilding President and CEO

SAN DIEGO -- Aviva Biosciences, a developer of active biochips with an emphasis on on-chip bioanalyte manipulation and screening, said it has appointed board member Peter Wilding as president and CEO. Mr. Wilding previously served as co-founder of ChemCore, a biochip company that was acquired by Caliper Technologies.

Mr. Wilding replaces co-founder Julian Yuan as president and CEO. Mr. Yuan, who invested in the company's Series A round, assumes the post of vice chairman.

Aviva Biosciences existing board members are Jing Cheng, co-founder of AVIVA Bioscience, professor at the Tsinghua University School of Life Sciences & Engineering, and research director at the Beijing National Biochip Research and Engineering Center; Charles H. Sie, chairman and former
vice president of the corporate engineering center's West coast site at Xerox; Mr. Yuan; and John Yu, first vice president and general manager of the technology department at China Development Industrial Bank.

Founded in 1999, Aviva Biosciences raised $5 million in Series A funding from China Development Industrial Bank, WI Harper, private equity firm Zimmerman, and Mr. Yuan.

http://www.avivabio.com

VC PERSONNEL

• Bush to Nominate Founder of Trident Capital as Envoy to EU

WASHINGTON -- President Bush is expected to nominate Rockwell Schnabel, founder and managing director of Trident Capital, as the U.S. envoy to the European Union (EU), according to Mr. Schnabel.

Mr. Schnabel said that, if his nomination was approved, he would expect to be away from Trident Capital until the end of the Bush administration, though he would remain a special limited partner. He said he was not sure whether he would return to the venture capital firm afterward.

Mr. Schnabel's four board seats at portfolio companies have been distributed to other partners in the firm over the last six months.

Prior to founding Trident Capital, Mr. Schnabel served as acting secretary of commerce and the deputy secretary of commerce during the Bush administration,
and as the U.S. ambassador to Finland during the Reagan administration.

Trident Capital manages more than $1.4 billion.

http://www.tridentcap.com

• PwC Venture Partners Adds Michael Jonovski to Team

LONDON -- PricewaterhouseCoopers Venture Partners (PwCVP), a seed- to early-stage venture capital firm that invests in business-to-business and life sciences companies, said it appointed Michael Jonovski, former assistant director in corporate finance practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers, as an investment director in its U.K. division. He is the ninth PwCVP venture partner.

PwCVP is led by CEO Jonathan Wackett and Gerry Devlin, managing director and founder. Formerly called Pricewaterhouse Incubator, the firm has made five investments since March 2000, and its portfolio includes Cataloga, First Professional, F-Exchange, and Speedclear.

http://www.pwcglobal.com

MARKETING & SALES

• Racemi Names RF Solutions CEO Steve Richeson as Mrktg. VP

ATLANTA -- Racemi, a provider of server architecture for enterprise and service provider data centers, said it named Steve Richeson as vice president of marketing. Mr. Richeson previously served as CEO of RF Solutions. Racemi has received seed funds from 5 Paces Ventures.

http://www.racemi.com

OPERATIONS

• Peace Software Names Derek Van Keuren as HR Vice President

MIAMI -- Peace Software, a provider of customer management technology for utilities and retail energy companies, said it named Derek Van Keuren as vice president of human resources. Mr. Van Keuren previously served as vice president of human resources at Forums Communications. Peace Software's investors include Insight Capital Partners and Kinetic Ventures.

http://www.peace.com

EXECUTIVE SEARCHES

Managing General Partner--Venture Capital--Bay Area or NYC-BOS corridor

New Fund in formation seeks a Managing General Partner (MGP) with at least 10 years experience as a venture capitalist. The MGP will lead a small team already in place. The goal of the Fund is to capitalize on the outsourcing trend, initially through making investments in attractive early to mid stage U.S. based technology companies whose growth might be enhanced by the Fund's Indian technology services partners. A candidate must have a demonstrably successful track record in venture capital/private equity investments and should currently be a general partner in a VC fund.

compensation: consistent with industry practice

e-mail: box1181@venturewire.com
company: n/a
[top]

Vice President Customer Engineering (Professional Services)--Software--S. San Francisco

The Vice President of Customer Engineering will be responsible for providing the leadership and management of the company's services efforts. The Vice President of Customer Engineering and Services will directly manage and lead an experienced, technically strong staff of which includes Professional Services, Technical Support and Educational Services.

Please see website for complete description.

Requirements:

*	Minimum of ten years managing Professional Services, particularly focused on the Enterprise, working with major Global 2000 businesses.

*	Experience building and leading Professional Services, Technical Support and Training Organizations

*	Experience in managing at least 10 concurrent projects.

*	5 years of experience managing teams in excess of at least 65 people.

*	Exceptional executive leadership manifested through organizing and motivating teams toward their respective goals by employing hands on management.

*	Responsibilities including recruiting, budgeting, and reporting.

e-mail: molly@modeln.com
company: Model N
[top]

To cancel, change, or update your subscription:

http://people.venturewire.com/account.asp


Attached is the EGM Management Summary and Hot List that will be reviewed
with Mike and Jeff at their staff meeting on Monday morning.  Please give me
a call if you have any questions/comments.

Thanks,
Jeff
(39859)
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000 03:36 PM
---------------------------

Patricia Anderson
09/15/2000 03:21 PM
To: Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hot List & Management Summary at 9/14

Patricia


Our move date is set for Friday, 11/9/01.  At this time they will be moving the gas trading group to the 6th floor and the gas operations group to the 5th floor.  They will follow with the power groups on the following Friday, 11/16/01.

Assistants: Please be ready to submit a churn on this Friday 10/5/01 for your individual groups (I will let you know if this changes and once I am certain of the seat numbers for your groups, I will give them to you). I will also need to give you your mail stop locations at the new building, which I am working on now with the mailroom.  In the meantime, from now till we move, please start cleaning up your areas and your groups areas and discarding anything that isn't needed.  It has been requested that only 6 boxes per person be moved because space is limited.  So we need to decide what can be sent to archives.  I will send you some forms for this. Please come to me with any questions.

Deskheads:  Unless, there is any changes from the office of the chair, I will set up a meeting with each one of you on Thursday to make sure you have no changes to your seating.  Once the churn is submitted there can not be any changes other than new additions to the group or deletions from the group.  This is to prevent there being any mixups when installing equipment at the new building.

-Ina Rangel


I'll let you know when I figure out what our Firm ID and Password are.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001 02:35 PM -----

	"ISDA" <cgreasley@isda.org>
	01/12/2001 09:11 PM
	Please respond to cgreasley

		 To: mark.taylor@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: ISDA Legal Opinions

January 12, 2001

MEMORANDUM TO PRIMARY / LEGAL OPINION CONTACTS

Netting Opinions
The legal opinion updates discussing the enforceability of the termination,
bilateral close-out netting and multibranch close-out netting provisions of
the 1987 and 1992 ISDA Master Agreements for twenty-nine jurisdictions are
now available in electronic format from the ISDA web site.   Legal opinion
updates from Bermuda, Canada, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, and The Netherlands
Antilles are expected shortly.

Collateral Opinions
Collateral opinions commissioned for Canada and Indonesia will be released
on the ISDA web site next week.

Last month each primary contact was sent a Firm ID and Password to allow
each access to electronic ISDA documentation.  The Firm ID and Password
would be required to access the legal opinion updates as well. ISDA provides
its legal opinions in electronic format to allow ISDA members to access the
opinions more readily and easily.  However, printed copies of the opinions
will be made available upon request.

Please click on the following link to access the legal opinions in PDF file
format from the ISDA web site
http://www.isda.org/docproj/netting_login.html. A free copy of Adobe Acrobat
Reader, which launches the PDF file format program, can be obtained from the
following Adobe web site:
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html.

Please note that these legal opinion updates will be available on the ISDA
web site for two weeks only.   The legal opinion updates will be removed
from the web site at the end of January.

Members are reminded that the ISDA legal opinions are intended for use by
ISDA members only.

ISDA is aware that providing these opinions is among the most important of
its member services.  If you encounter any problems accessing the legal
opinions or if you have any questions regarding the content or the process
of collecting and reviewing the opinions, please contact the ISDA office by
email at isda@isda.org by telephone on 212 332 1200.

Robert Pickel
General Counsel


Thanks.  I'll wait to hear from you.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sternberg, Michelle" <MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:23 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Ngo, Tracy; Wilson, Anthony; Yaish, Yair
Subject:	RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Sara -

At the point the language was agreed to in the below agreement we may not
have been aware of the regulatory contraints under PUHCA that does not allow
for the inclusion of Affiliates under Set-Off (we may actually have to amend
that agreement to carve it out).

With respect to the our ISDA, I will make sure to forward to Anthony the
provision in question and ask him when he has some availability to get on a
call in the beginning of next week to discuss.

Regards,
Michelle

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:27 PM
To: MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com
Cc: Tracy.Ngo@enron.com
Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Michelle:

Per my voice mail, please:

(1) review the Master Energy Purchase and Sale Agreement dated March 1,
2000 (Section 4.4(d)) between Allegheny Energy Supply Company LLC and Enron
Power Marketing, Inc., as amended, for your previously negotiated setoff
language, and

(2) please forward a copy of the proposed setoff language to Anthony Wilson
so that he can explain what portion of the provision violates Section 6 of
PUHCA.  I will be available for a call at his (and your) convenience.

Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Sternberg, Michelle" <MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:33 AM
   To:     Shackleton, Sara
   Cc:     Yaish, Yair
   Subject:  FW: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

   Sara -

   I spoke with Yair about your suggestion to have a "unilateral" approach
   to
   include Affiliates for yourselves but not for us since we are restricted
   by
   PUHCA (as explained by Anthony Wilson, our in house regulatory attorney)
   and
   he is inclined to not agree to your request (our approach is either if
   applied to both of us or neither of us).

   Let me know if you need to discuss this further - in which case we will
   get
   on a call (Yair, you and myself) to discuss.

   Regards,
   Michelle

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Sternberg, Michelle
   Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:18 PM
   To: 'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'
   Cc: Yaish, Yair
   Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

   Sara -

   I have spoken with our in-house regulatory specialist and she has
   informed
   me that we cannot agree to include our regulated or non-regulated
   Affiliates
   in Set Off under the Public Utility Holding Company Act without getting
   approval from the SEC.

   Please advise if we can proceed on the ISDA with carving out Affiliates
   in
   Set Off, as per our original request.

   Regards,
   Michelle

   Allegheny Energy Global Markets
   Office of General Counsel
   909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
   New York, New York 10022
   (T) 212-224-8718
   (F) 212-224-8446/8711

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Sternberg, Michelle
   Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:35 PM
   To: 'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'
   Cc: Yaish, Yair
   Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

   Sara -

   I am checking internally if we can agree to the below.  I will get back
   to
   you in the beginning of next week.

   Regards,
   Michelle

   Allegheny Energy Global Markets
   Office of General Counsel
   909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
   New York, New York 10022
   (T) 212-224-8718
   (F) 212-224-8446/8711

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:38 PM
   To: MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com
   Cc: Marie.Heard@enron.com
   Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

   Michelle:

   With respect to your setoff request, we cannot agree to eliminate setoff
   for your non-regulated affiliates.  Perhaps you could provide us with
   the
   regulated affiliate(s) for a carve out.  I look forward to hearing from
   you.  Regards.

   Sara Shackleton
   Enron Wholesale Services
   1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
   Houston, TX  77002
   Ph:  (713) 853-5620
   Fax: (713) 646-3490

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   "Sternberg, Michelle" <MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sternberg+2C+20Michelle+22+20+3CMSternberg+40aeglobalm
   arkets+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:   Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:14 AM
      To:     Shackleton, Sara
      Cc:     Heard, Marie
      Subject:  ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

      Sara -

      As per Marie's instructions, please find attached a blackline
      incorporating
      the changes that will be required to be made in the final form of
   ISDA
      (modifications to the Notice and Set-Off provisions).  The attached
   is
      the
      last version that I have but if the changes are acceptable, I would
      suggest
      that you take the changes and incorporate it into your form of
   agreement
      since it is the final version.

       <<ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc>>

      Once reviewed, please let me know if the changes are acceptable - at
      which
      point you can forward to me a revised Schedule (without the signature
      page)
      via e-mail and I can have the agreement countersigned and replace the
      Schedule with your revised Schedule.

      Thank you for your patience.

      Regards,
      Michelle

       - ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc << File: ENRON ISDA.REVISED
      9.26.01.doc >>

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


this afternoon-any time


summary attached

-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M.
Sent: Thu 12/20/2001 9:56 AM
To: Yeung, Charles
Cc:
Subject: RE: FERC Orders Standards Organization by March 15, and OtherMarket Design stuff

Please send me a summary.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Yeung, Charles
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:39 AM
To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Lindberg, Susan; Comnes, Alan
Cc: Presto, Kevin M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject: FW: FERC Orders Standards Organization by March 15, and OtherMarket Design stuff

Smell of victory?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike McElhany
Sent: Thu 12/20/2001 8:23 AM
To: estf@nerc.com
Cc:
Subject: FERC Orders Standards Organization by March 15, and OtherMarket Design stuff

See attached


I need to take a few hours off Tuesday afternoon after lunch.  I have some family business to attend to.  I should only be gone 2 hours or so.  Susan will be here to handle EOL.  Let me know if you have a problem with this.  I know I need to be here, but this is something I have to take care of and this was the only time I could schedule it.

Thanks,

Jay


Mark Taylor has bronchitis/laryngitis and will not be in the office today.
He has asked that you not call him unless it is absolutely necessary.
However, if I can be of assistance, please let me know.

Thank you,

Holly Keiser
Enron Americas
Legal Department - EB 3887
713-345-7893 (ph)
713-646-3490 (fx)
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


Today, the Euros are coming and John is going to be running this negotiation - here's the bad news they are not coming until 3:30pm today so we may have to work late.

Barry Tycholiz will be running this team. Barry - talk to Andy on form if you need help - you will also need to think about getting some traders available over week-end.

The Schedule outline is based on initial overview discussions/presentations  and then more detailed discussion can occur in individual groups the outline is as follows:

It may be better to split up earlier but I leave all those decisions to Andy.

4:00		Introduction			John Lavorato & Louise Kitchen
4:45		Financial Overview		Wes Colwell
5:15		Risk Overview			Buy / Port
5:45		Credit				Bradford
6:15		Back Office			Beck/Hall
6:45		Systems (EnronOnline)		Jay Webb
7:15	            Mid/Back Office Systems	Jay Webb
			Infrastructure			Jenny Rub

Please make yourselves available - the meetings will take place in 2991

Tammie - please organize lunch and refreshments etc on John's card.

Tammie - please check availability.

Thanks for your continued understanding.

Louise


FYI
----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 03/20/2001 03:55 PM -----

	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>
	03/20/2001 02:30 PM

		 To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<donna.fulton@enron.com>, <janelle.scheuer@enron.com>,
<jeff_brown@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>, <jsteffe@enron.com>,
<Mary.Hain@enron.com>, <rshapiro@enron.com>, <sarah.novosel@enron.com>,
<tom.hoatson@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Commission Actions to Remove Obstacles in Western US- Key Points
for EPSA Comments, Due MARCH 30TH

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Joe Hartsoe, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
            Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy

DATE: March 20, 2001

RE: Commission Actions to Increase Supply and Decrease
      Consumption in the Western United States--Key Points for
      EPSA Comments Due MARCH 30TH

As we previously reported, on March 14, 2001, FERC announced certain actions
to address the energy problems in California and other areas of the West in
an Order Removing Obstacles to Increased Electric Generation and Natural Gas
Supply in the Western United States and Requesting Comments on Further
Actions to Increase Energy Supply and Decrease Energy Consumption.  The
following is an overview of the steps the Commission proposes to "immediately
help increase supply from existing power sources and to provide regulatory
incentives to build new electric and natural gas infrastructure."  The
Commission also invited comments on certain proposals.  This memo includes a
list of key points we intend to make in comments that are due by March 30th.

Overview of Order

The Order reflects a thorough review of  "all of [FERC's] rate and facility
certification authorities in the areas of electric energy, natural gas,
hydroelectric and oil to determine how it can increase electric energy
supply"; however, the Commission noted that its authority is "somewhat
limited."  While the Commission believes state regulators must assume the
lead role due to their authority over siting of generation and transmission,
as well as demand reduction measures, the Commission noted that the impact of
California's energy shortage on the Western Interconnection "underscores the
regional, interstate nature of the energy marketplace."  Accordingly, it
encouraged the formation of a single regional transmission organization for
western markets.

EPSA appreciates the Commission's effort to exercise the full extent of its
authority to help ease the West's energy problems.  Taken together, the
Commission's proposed actions represent positive steps toward rational
solutions to the difficult circumstances in the West.  Most importantly, the
Order highlights the importance of promoting infrastructure investment,
including increased generation, transmission and natural gas pipeline
facilities.

The Commission's immediate actions, which will expire on December 31, 2001,
include:

-Requiring the California ISO and transmission owners within the WSCC to
provide FERC with a list of short-term grid enhancements.

-Extending and broadening waivers of operating and efficiency standards and
fuel use requirements for qualifying facilities (QF).

-Providing wholesale power sales from generation used primarily for backup
and self-generation for businesses with prior notice waivers and market-based
rate authorization.

-Allowing wholesale and retail load reduction to be resold at wholesale
market-based rates.

The Commission seeks comment on several other proposals, including:

-Rolling in new supply interconnection and upgrade costs.

-Increasing the rate of return on equity for projects that significantly
increase transmission on constrained and new routes in the near term.

-10-year depreciation for short-term transmission projects, and 15-year
depreciation for upgrades involving new rights of way that can be in service
by November 1, 2002.

-Use of the interconnection authority set forth in FPA  o210(d) to help
alleviate obstacles to electric supply reaching load.

EPSA's Comments

In its conclusion, the Commission stated that comments should be "concise and
focused."  Accordingly, we suggest that EPSA's comments focus on the
following areas:

? Applaud the Commission's effort to increase supplies from QFs, but
encourage it to provide relief from existing contracts by allowing QFs to
sell to creditworthy parties.

? We understand that there are ongoing differences of opinion regarding the
relative merits of an incremental versus a "rolled in" approach to
interconnection and upgrade costs.  Therefore, while we may lack a consensus
on the question as a final policy position, we believe that the extreme
circumstances surrounding the Order, and the urgent need to move power
quickly into the Western system, make it wise to endorse FERC's instant
recommendation.

? The Commission's proposed actions to create and enhance incentives relating
to expanding and improving the transmission infrastructure through higher
ROEs and accelerated depreciation schedules are positive steps.  The
Commission normally conditions such premiums on meaningful participation in
regional transmission organizations.  However, given the current situation
and the immediate impact of any projects that might be entitled to the higher
ROE, EPSA could support this proposal.

? Constraints on the gas infrastructure have a generally adverse impact on
the energy supply system.  Therefore, the Commission's proposed waivers of
blanket certificates and rate incentives to expedite construction projects,
are favorable developments.

We will discuss the Order and EPSA's comments during tomorrow's Regulatory
Affairs/Power Marketers' conference call.  In addition, we have been asked to
consider what type of short-term relief could be included in federal
legislation.  We will discuss this question as well.  To access the call,
dial 1-800-937-6563 and ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA call. In the meantime,
if you have any questions, please contact either Julie Simon, jsimon@epsa.org
or Mark Bennett, mbennett@epsa.org at (202 628-8200).


Hi Tom,  at your request the execution of these agreements have been on
hold.  Most of the leg work has been done.  I completed the negotiations on
the agreement so moving forward is a matter of getting a document ready for
signatures and getting it signed, having lawyers on both side proof read it
and getting the agreement and accompanying documents (which are complete)
executed.  This process, which is mainly administrative, could take two or
three days if I focused on as a priority to make sure it gets done.

Let me know how you want to proceed.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Tom Doukas/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/26/2001 05:16 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, David A Wall/Risk Mgmt/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard
Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Prime Broker Accounts

Sara & Cheryl,

Could you please provide a status on where we stand on the transfer of the
Credit book from ENA/ECT to ECI at Goldman and Morgan.

I had previously asked you to hold up on Morgan until the Bear issue was
resolved.  I am hoping we do not have to much effort ahead of us to move
these two accounts over.

Thanks,

Tom


jeraldine ocasio
2257University Avenue, Apt. 2E, Bronx
NY, NY 10468
guaro712@aol.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

jeraldine ocasio


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 10:08 AM -----

	Richard B Sanders
	10/24/2000 05:34 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kazeem
Khan/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christian
Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Some thoughts on options

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 05:24 PM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	10/24/2000 04:45 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: Some thoughts on options

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Richard,

 After today's discussion here are our brainstorming ideas on
options:

1.   WAIT FOR A BETTER PROTECTIVE ORDER
 Ask Harvey Morris where they are on fixing the protective order that
is being litigated by others.  If the protective order has not  changed,
then unilaterally postpone production until it is.  Pro: Better protection
and more time; Con: Even with a more stringent
 protective order Enron still questions whether the PUC is entitled
to financial performance data.  Thus, this option does not fully
disclose all of Enron's positions and the company may be accused later of
simply engaging in delaying tactics.  Under this option  we file our
formal objections as well.

2. TURN OVER THE TRANSACTION DATA AS IS
 Continue on our present course of turning over transaction data for
electricity that was delivered.  Pro: PUC will get the data  anyway
either through FERC, unfair competition, antitrust or price gouging
litigation.  By turning over the data that will show  profits, PUC might
slow down investigation there as opposed to interrupting the business by
seeking to depose witnesses etc.  Con:  This would be waiving the
legitimate question that Enron has as to the PUC's ability to discovery this
information through a  subpoena.  There is also a question of how
confidential this data would be given the current political agenda.  It
might also serve  to whet the appetite of the PUC for more Enron
information and discovery.   This option would also provide confidential
proprietary information to the PUC about how Enron gets its competitive
advantage.

3. TURN OVER DATA FOR OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA AND LET PUC GET REST OF
DATA FROM ISO AND PX.
 We have told the PUC we do not want to duplicate the efforts of ISO
and PX so the way to relieve the burden on us is to give  only missing
data. PRO:  It would be easier and quicker to just give the outside of
California data and would sidestep for the
 moment the ongoing jurisdictional question.  Con:  Without Enron
cost data for the California ISO and PX transactions, the PUC
 would not be able to arrive at what they want -- a profit and loss
picture.  We would have a hard time representing to the PUC that  the
combination of the PUC data and the Enron data would be all that they need
to calculate the answers to Request Nos. 7-10.

4. TURN OVER EVERYTHING BUT PRICE
 This option would simple omit the price data.  Pro:  It would not
reveal the profit and loss information.  Con:  It would not reveal the
profit and loss information.  In other words, the PUC is clear that this is
what they are after.  By giving them everything else, we
 would in effect be telling them we will not turn over profit and
loss.  Moreover, by piecing some of it together with the ISO and PX
data, the PUC might be able to put together a revenue picture which will be
quite large, but just not the cost or expense side.

5. DECLINE TO PRODUCE THE DATA
 We would tell Harvey Morris that Enron has reconsidered its position
for the following reasons:  (1) Our firm belief that the PUC is  not
entitled to the profit and loss data they are seeking; (2) in his latest
email, Harvey has made it clear that the PUC wants more  data (1999)
than we discussed earlier; (3) continued threat that if they do not like the
transaction data they will come back and  ask for profit and loss
information that we do not believe they are entitled to; (4) Commissioner
Wood's statement that the purpose  of this investigation is to get
money from market participants in the hands of consumers; (5) investigation
by the AG into activities  of other market participants and the notice
that other governmental agencies are cooperating -- who are we producing
this  information to and for what purpose; (6) Enron favors public
disclosure of trading data but only if all participants are required to
do so; (7) Enron is a small player in this market and many other market
participants are not involved in the process BPA etc.    PRO:  This
may be the only way to preserve Enron's challenge to the jurisdiction of the
PUC to get this data.  Moreover, in the  current political
environment there is no assurance where this information will be leaked.  It
also makes sense to see what FERC  will do with their published 11/1/00
report on investigation date. Under this option, we file our formal
objections and sit back and  wait.

6. ME TOO
 Upon reflection, we agree with the approach taken by the other
market participants.  We will not produce until the protective order  is
modified and then only data that is within the PUC jurisdiction.  PRO:  This
makes it look like all the market participants are  acting in concert
and really is no different than option 1 above.  Moreover, if you read
Reliant's responses, they appear ready to  turn over financial data if
the protective order is modified. (Terry and Mike Day are both out of their
offices today.)  Note that  Williams is adopting a strategy that says
the PUC needs to go to Superior Court to enforce its subpoena.  This may be
met with  strong opposition by the PUC given their California
constitutional contempt authority.

7. MOVE TO QUASH BEFORE THE ALJ
 Here we would raise all of the arguments that we have about why the
PUC does not have jurisdiction and fight it out on the merits  before the
ALJ.  PRO:  The ALJ is a forum to raise the jurisdictional questions.  It
has the least procedural risks of being  dismissed.  CON:  Reading
the tea leaves, we believe it unlikely that the ALJ will determine that the
PUC has no jurisdiction.
 Moreover, because the PUC has its own constitutionally granted
contempt power, the PUC will take the view (according to Mike  Day) that
they need not go to the Superior Court for enforcement.  They will also take
the view that the Superior Court has no  jurisdiction  to hear our
appeal.  Appeals have to go to the PUC and those orders are appealable at
the Court of Appeal level.   Thus, the only de novo review of our
objections might be at the ALJ level.

8. FILE DECLARATORY RELIEF ACTION IN FEDERAL COURT IN CALIFORNIA
 We would claim federal question jurisdiction under the Federal Power
Act and in particular the provisions of 824(g) under which the PUC
issued its subpoena in part.  The dispute to be decided is whether the PUC
has the jurisdiction to seek the profit and  loss information from the
wholesale market.  The authority for this would be Mississippi Power & Light
v. Mississippi  487 US  354 (bright line between wholesale market regulated
by FERC and the retail market regulated by states); Bristol Energy Corp v.
New Hampshire 13 F.3d 471 (1st Cir. 1994)(federal question whether state
agency can inquire into business and financial data  in the wholesale
market but found no cognizable claim.)  PRO:  The federal forum may be more
even handed than the ALJ, but  the question is whether we can state a
cognizable claim.  There may be greater protections from disclosure of the
information as  well.  CON:  The PUC may continue on a parallel track unless
we are able to obtain injunctive relief.  The PUC might seek  discovery of
the same information in the Federal court proceeding.  We should assume that
this action will trigger the strongest  response from the PUC and/or the AG
in form of further investigations or alternative forums for getting the same
information (e.g  unfair business practice suit, price gouging,
anti-trust etc.).   We should anticipate deposition requests for traders
etc.  By taking  this position, we will clearly be conceding that if
FERC asks for the data it is germane to their authority.

9. SEPARATE RESPONSES/STRATEGIES FOR DIFFERENT ENRON ENTITIES
 It may make some sense to chart a different course for Portland
General, EES and EEMC and continue to produce some data from  those
entities.  PRO:  The information provided for these entities is not likely
to generate profit and loss information that would be  germane to the fight
we are about to engage in (e.g. EES's description of % off tariff rates for
example.)  For Portland General,  Dave Aamodt is out of the office and
not able to participate in any change of direction discussions.

Hope this is helpful.
Thanks
Gary

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000 09:39
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           07/12/2000 08:21 AM

To: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Columbia/New Power Asset Purchase

New Power Company will be formally taking over the CES-Retail Agreement
effective 7/31/00.  Who should be responsible for changing all the deals in
Sitara to correctly reflect the new arrangement?    Please advise.
---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT on 07/12/2000
08:19 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  Mark Breese                           07/10/2000 06:46 PM

To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Columbia/New Power Asset Purchase

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Breese/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 06:45
PM ---------------------------
   Carol St Clair                07/10/2000 06:45 PM

To: Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Columbia/New Power Asset Purchase

Mark:
I received a notice in the mail in connection with Columbia Energy Services
Corporation's sale of its "Mass Markets" business to The New Power Company.
The purpose of the notice was to inform us that effective July 31, 2000
Columbia would be assigning its interest in the January 30, 1998 ISDA Master
Agreement that it has with ENA to New Power as well as all transactions under
it.  Please call me if you have any questions about this.  I expect that we
will receive shortly a formal consent agreement.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


hey, haven't read this yet, will try today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Juan Carlos Perez Bofill" <jcperez@vhlpr.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Juan+20Carlos+20Perez+20Bofill+22+20+3Cjcperez+40vhlpr+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 10, 2001 11:09 AM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	Greetings

Matt,

Long time no  hear, hope you're doing fine at the new company. Sorry to bother you  with this issue again since I know Leo Sommaripa has contacted you  already, so I'll be brief and to the point.

We have been  trying to save a copy of the Database on a CD-R so that we can give it to the  client for their reference but some issues have come up which have to do with  programming. Our intention is for the client to keep the database in the CD and  to be able to access all the features in it so that there is no need for them to  copy it unto a hard drive and possibly modify the data.  Since by saving it unto a CD makes the database  read-only, there's no problem with keeping the data on the disk intact, and  we're even working on a disclaimer to paste on the database.

The problem is  that by making it into a read-only file, some commands have become disabled.  Specifically, the buttons on the review form that access the compliance,  operations, equipment, and staffing forms are not available through the  read-only format. I ventured into the programming codes for the commands and  found the following string on all four buttons:

DoCmd.DoMenuItem acFormBar, acRecordsMenu,  acSaveRecord, , acMenuVer70

I temporarily  deleted that line from the programming codes for all four and so far have not  had any problems with accessing all levels of the database in the CD. Now, I do  not know exactly what that string does to the database but would much rather  find a safer alternative if possible or at least know that the string is  not a critical part of the process. If this is something that can be answered  right off the bat I'd appreciate it, I realize that this is not a priority  anymore so if its something that will consume  a extended period of time,  let me know and I will continue seraching through other  channels.

I guess this  wasn't brief after all and I appreciate the time and effort. I can be  emailed or I can make the arrangements to call you, whatever's better for  you.

JCP

Juan Carlos P?rez Bofill, ME
Environmental Engineer
Vincenty, Heres & Lauria
P.O. Box 13455
San Juan, PR 00908-3455
(787)722-4646
(787)723-0232 (fax)


I was waiting by the phone all day and night for you to call, but no, I was
ever dissappointed that I was not a high priority for you.  I suppose I'll
just keep waiting.

Mat

"kristen iles" <ksiles@hotmail.com> on 01/17/2001 11:19:37 AM
To: matt.smith@enron.com
cc:

Subject: in reply

Hey cutie, I just spent forever writing you a nice little reply to your
email on the ski trip, my email availibility, phone b.s, your NYC trip and
Scully, all to have this piece of shit freeze up....so I think perhaps I
will just try to get some time to call you tonight!!!!
love, k

You should now have checks from myself, Duncan and Bill.  Sharon said she
would get back to me today, but I think we should jump on this lodge asap.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


-----Original Message-----
From: April Page [mailto:apage@oilstates.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:27 AM
To: John Schwebel (E-mail); Robert Pearson (E-mail);
JENNIFER.THARP@UBC.ORG; RECOLLARD@YAHOO.COM; SAD1249@AOL.COM
Subject: FW: Bride & Groom

-----Original Message-----
From:	MWeyrich [mailto:mweyrich@oilstates.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	April Page (E-mail); Enetric Williams (E-mail); Erica Mathis (E-mail);
Nolen Glaze Jr. (E-mail); Robert Pearson (E-mail); Tammie Stuckey (E-mail)
Subject:	FW: Bride & Groom

Bribe and Groom
During the wedding rehearsal, the groom approached the pastor with an
unusual offer:
"Look, I'll give you $100 if you'll change the wedding vows. When you get to
the part where I'm supposed to promise to 'love, honor and obey' and 'be
faithful to her forever,' I'd appreciate it if you'd just leave that out."
He passed the minister a $100 bill and walked away satisfied. On the day of
the wedding, when it came time for the groom's vows, the pastor looked the
young man in the eye and said:
"Will you promise to prostrate yourself before her, obey her every command
and wish, serve her breakfast in bed every morning of your life, and swear
eternally before God and your lovely wife that you will not ever even look
at another woman, as long as you both shall live?"
The groom gulped and looked around, and said in a tiny voice, "Yes," then
leaned toward the pastor and hissed: "I thought we had a deal."
The pastor put a $100 bill into the groom's hand and whispered: "She made me
a better offer."


Mrs. Lovett asked me to let you know that her  appointment with Tom Simmons
of Spencer Stuart is at 3:00 p.m. today.? She  welcomes encouragement for pro
bono services from any of you who have a  particularly strong relationship
with Tom and Spencer Stuart.
?
Linda Gardner
Executive Assistant
Greater Houston Community  Foundation


Gentlemen:

Enron is exploring the possibility of becoming involved in a research
endeavor called the New Economy Value Research Lab. The Lab is the result of
a joint effort between MIT's Sloan School of Management and Arthur Andersen
(AA). Its purpose is to develop "quantitative valuations of the intangible
assets Wall Street finds increasingly important in the New Economy" (Business
Week, 2/7/00). Clearly, as Enron continues to shift from a hard asset to
intangible asset based organization, the question of "how to" accurately and
appropriate measure and value our intangible assets is becoming increasingly
important.

Last week, Steve Kean, Vince Kaminski, Marie Hejka, and myself met with a
team from AA, the Deputy Dean of the Sloan School, and MIT's lead
accounting/finance professor to discuss the intent of the Lab, expected
outcomes, and how Enron may be involved. Post that meeting, the decision was
made to continue to explore participation in the Lab. Enron now needs to 1)
define our corporate measurement and valuation process needs, and 2) identify
value attributes important to Enron and the industries in which we operate.
Once defined, a follow up meeting will be held with MIT and next steps will
be determined.

Your expertise and assistance could significantly impact the inputs and
outcomes of these next steps. Please schedule time on Tuesday August 1 from
2:00 to 3:30 to attend the next meeting, during which we will begin to
identify needs and define value attributes. Location will be EB 49c4. Please
notify me if you are unable to attend.

Lastly, to assist with preparation for this meeting, I am attaching notes
from a recently published book entitled  Cracking the Value Code: How
Businesses Are Creating Wealth in the New Economy (May 2000, Boulton, Libert,
Samek - Arthur Andersen).

Should you like more information on the Lab, previous meeting, book or other,
please feel free to contact me.

I look forward to meeting you.
Regards,
Amy Oberg


---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Cutaia/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000
10:09 AM ---------------------------

Etelvina Guerra@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
11/13/2000 09:39 AM
To: amartinez@proeza.com.mx, Jessica.Anaya/HOU/ECT@ECT,
claudiaidette@aol.com, <taikkiris_chick@hotmail.com>, ccantu@abm.com,
CorralesM@EpEnergy.com, aurora_garcia@valic.com, HerreraM@perryhomes.net,
Jennifer Cutaia/CORP/ENRON@ENRON, karina.benavides@lyondell-citgo.com,
LisaCastillo/NA/ENRON@ENRON.COM, Yanira.MARTINEZ@us.socgen.com @ ENRON, Iris
montemayor/GPGFIN/ENRON@Enron, nohemisalazar@yahoo.com,
yolly_lolly@yahoo.com, Claudia.Guerra@Enron.Com, Sonia
Guerra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, zkafarela@hotmail.com
cc:

Subject: Staying Busy

> You MUST Read Out LOUD!
>
> Go slow, not too fast
> when you do this.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This is this cat
> This is is cat
> This is how cat
> This is to cat
> This is keep cat
> This is a cat
> This is retard cat
> This is busy cat
> This is for cat
> This is forty cat
> This is seconds cat
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Scroll down .....
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Now go back and read the THIRD word, in each line, from the start.
> Everyone knows someone they can send THIS to!!!


Start Date: 12/11/01; HourAhead hour: 24;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001121124.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 24 / Preferred: 469.59 / Final: 469.59)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 12/11/01
  SC_ID: ENRJ


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042223.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 23 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TRADING_SC: ECH1
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/17/2000 09:30
PM ---------------------------

Traci Warner@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 08/16/2000 03:14:14 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Elyse
Kalmans/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Meeting to discuss U of H

Steve, Rod and Elyse -

Just wanted to confirm our meeting on Tuesday Aug 29th from 1:30 -2:30 to
discuss Uof H's endowment proposal.  We will meeting Rod's office EB4054

I look forward to seeing you all there.

Sincerely,

Traci

Traci Warner
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
Phone (713) 853-3242
Cell (713) 705-7201


Dear All, Looking fwd to Tues meeting, have not had a chance to review
background note produced for it but was hoping a digital copy could be made
available asap, pls advise...

Cheers,

Christine

Yolanda Clegg wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
>
> We look forward to the first meeting of The Electricity Restructuring
Advisory Board.  The meeting will be held in Montreal, January 16, 2001
(commencing at 8:30 am), at the Commission for Environmental Cooperation
(CEC), 393 St-Jacques Street West, Suite 200.
>
> The CEC will cover all travel expenses along with accommodations and per
diem. Kindly complete the attached "Confirmation of Participation" form and
return it to Leticia Villeneuve by Dec. 18, 2000 (lvillene@ccemtl.org or fax
514-350-4345) so that we can arrange your travel plans. Since the holidays
are almost here, please note that after this Dec 18 deadline, we ask that you
arrange your own travel/hotel and the CEC will reimburse you (for an economy
priced ticket).
>
> Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or
concerns.
>
> Thank you,
> Yolanda Clegg
>
> Yolanda Clegg, M.Sc.
> Environment, Economy and Trade Program
> North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation
> 393 rue St-Jacques Ouest, bureau 200
> Montreal
> Quebec
> CANADA         H2Y 1N9
>
> tel: 514-350-4368
> fax: 514-350-4314
> yolanda@ccemtl.org
>
> http://www.cec.org
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                Name: Confirmation-english.doc
>    Confirmation-english.doc    Type: Download File (application/msword)
>                            Encoding: base64
>
>                                  Name: Confirmation - Spanish.doc
>    Confirmation - Spanish.doc    Type: Download File (application/msword)
>                              Encoding: base64

--
****************************************
Christine Elwell
Sierra Club of Canada
Senior Policy Analyst
517 College St. Suite #237
Toronto, ON, Canada, M6G-4A2
Phone#:416-533-5177 Fax:416-960-0020
E-mail: scenergy@web.net
****************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 10/13/2000 05:04:30 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report

e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286

 - wp101600.pdf


Yes.  Thanks.  DF

	From:  Paul Cherry                           06/01/2000 04:27 PM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Augie

 Drew,

 I will be there. Will it be in your office?

 Paul

	From:  Drew Fossum                           06/01/2000 04:21 PM

To: Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Ted Chavez/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Augie

Augie Shouse of V&E is coming over here at 3 tomorrow.  Dari, I'll dial you
in.  Kent--do you want to be involved?  Paul, could you and Ted join us at 3
to talk about the credit/guarantee issues?  Hopefully we'll know more by then
about where TCEM is coming from.  DF


Charlene, the 2nd is ok. Either Mark, myself or John should probably be able
to do the 28th as well.  Obviously, we strongly believe in the benefit of the
program and its goals - ultimately, we  have to walk the talk!
Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/05/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------

Charlene Jackson@ENRON
10/05/2000 05:47 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Participation in Super Saturday

Hi Dave,
Thanks for agreeing to participate in Super Saturday.  Unfortunately, I gave
you the wrong date.  I think I told you December 9th and it should have been
December 2nd.  I hope that is still OK.  We are still looking for someone to
do the first one which is October 28th.  I think it would be great if someone
at your level could start it off to send a message.  However, I won't get
greedy  I will take what I can get (smile). Just let me know.

With respect to the straw man, I have worked on it but it is not complete.
Celeste was scheduled to be here this week but has been put on bed rest by
her doctor and has had to leave a week early.  I am trying to work with her
recruiters who are in the middle of campus presentations, etc.  I will finish
working on it this weekend and we can meet on Tuesday.  I will call Kay and
get on your schedule.   I will try to get you a draft prior to our meeting
(by Monday) so you can review it before hand.
Thanks Charlene

David W Delainey@ECT
10/04/2000 01:58 PM
To: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Participation in Super Saturday

Charlene, that will be fine... on a different note, where are you on the
straw man we spoke about.  Ultimately, I would like to continue to push this
with the leadership team.

Regards
Delainey


The Wellness Department has scheduled a blood drive on Thursday, March 14, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.  An M.D. Anderson Blood Center mobile coach will be parked on Andrews Street in front of Enron Center North to accommodate donors.  Call the the Health Center at ext. 3-6100 or send an email to mailto:health.center@enron.com to schedule an appointment.  If you need additional information, visit http://hrweb.enron.com/wellness/healthService/bloodDrive.asp.


I do not see my name anywhere?
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
04:05 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Yvette G Connevey @ ENRON                           05/12/2000 04:02 PM

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: This Friday - Lunch

---------------------- Forwarded by Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron on
05/12/2000 04:00 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Yvette G Connevey                           05/10/2000 11:28 AM

To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: This Friday - Lunch

Please plan to meet in the Lobby at 11:20 to have lunch with Brenda and Steve
and all of the Risk Team.

See ya then!
Y


>
>
>

 - turkey hunt.exe


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 07:56
AM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
10/24/2000 06:10 PM
To: Jeffrey Porter/HOU/EES@EES, dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com, Michael H
Garred/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Nov Capacity

I checked the CGLF and CGAS capacity against Navigator.  Take a look and let
me know what you think.  Also, do you know the demand charges for the CGAS
items highlighted in purple?


I have the names of the persons that need to respond but I have not had time to send out an email - which I will do ASAP.

Victor

Richard Ring
07/27/2001 10:19 AM
To:	Victor Gonzalez/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	Customer Account #'s

Victor,

Have you had any time to address Vinay's request?

Thanks,

Richard

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Ring/HOU/EES on 07/27/2001 10:17 AM ---------------------------

Vinay Adenwala
07/26/2001 05:53 PM

To:	Victor Gonzalez/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Customer Account #'s

Hello Victor,

My name is Vini Adenwala, I'm doing some research for Narsimha Misra and Richard Ring for the East Power Risk Mgmt. Dept., and I wanted to ask you  for some information regarding our customers in Massachusetts.  I have a list of contracts here:

1. Polaroid Corporation
2. Quebecor Printing USA Corp.
3. Simon Property Corp.
4. Sonoco Products Co.
5. Lucent Technologies Inc.
6. Haverhill Police Station
7. BICC General Cable Industries, Inc.

What I need to get from you is a customer list along w/ their account #'s for each of these contracts, and Richard told me you were the person I should talk to.  If you could provide me with a list of the individuals responsible  for billing each account, or even the customer acct. #'s themselves, I would greatly appreciate it.  Thank you for your time and cooperation.

Regards,

Vinay Adenwala


Thank you for agreeing to speak at Risk  Magazine's Annual US Congress, Risk
2000, taking place in Boston between 12-15  June 2000.
?
Could you please return this email with your full postal  address and contact
details so we can  send you hard copies of the brochure, inform you of
congress and hotel locations  and let you know when we will need a copy of
your presentation. If you are part  of a panel discussion, myself or the
panel moderator will contact you  shortly.
?
In the meantime the full brochure can be viewed and/or  downloaded from the
following web address -
?
www.riskpublications.com/risk2000us
?
If you have any further questions, please  don't hesitate to contact me.
?
Best regards,
?
Oliver Bennett
Senior Conference Producer
?
?
Direct: +44 (0)20 7484  9880
?
Risk Publications, 28-29 Haymarket,  London SW1Y 4RX
Fax: +44 (0)20 7484 9800? Email: oliver@risk.co.uk
www.riskpublications.com


Hey Danny,

Here is a prospective roster for Flag Football.  All are Enron employees.

Eric Bass
Brian Hoskins
Tim Blanchard
Matt Lenhart
Luis Mena
Jeff Gossett
Ken Shulklapper
Amir Ahanchian
Nick Hiemstra

Can you tell us what night the games will be on?

When do you need the due?

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


Opps.  I didn't notice C Sherman's name.  I'm unclear as to whether Herman
needs it also.

Kay Mann
05/15/2001 11:16 AM
To: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: GE- Standard Domestic Contract- Need your help

Herman Manis will need the opportunity to review, also.

ckm


Chris -
Would you mind e-mailing Evelyn your contact information at the APX? And I
can't recall whether or not we wanted to confirm these trades. Let me know
when you get a chance, and I'll take care of it with the Confirms group.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/30/2001 03:02 PM
---------------------------

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/30/2001 03:01 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Automated Power Exchange

Kate, have we started using this brokerage firm yet.  If so, do you have any
phone numbers to contact them?  Also, do you know how we are going to confirm
their trades?

Thanks


I would be interested in your thoughts.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
06/29/99 10:31 AM ---------------------------

Elena Kapralova
06/29/99 09:03 AM
To: Rahil Jafry/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcello Romano/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Goddard/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Gary Foster/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Disclaimer in HoustonStreet Press Release

Rahil,

According to Clifford Chance, our European Legal Advisor, this disclaimer
must be driven by regulatory and investment issues in US, i.e. SEC
requirements.
In Europe, the paragraph like this would not be necessary in the ress
release, but as our press release will be issued in US, it may need further
investigation with US lawyers....

Rahil Jafry
29/06/99 11:10
To: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcello Romano/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul
Goddard/LON/ECT@ECT, Elena Kapralova/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT,
Gary Foster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: HoustonStreet.com

Pls. note the disclaimer at the end of the message (highlighted in red).
Justin/Gary, is there a specific legal or PR related reason for this?
Would we have to make similar disclaimers in our press release?  Gary and I
are working on draft press releases currently and will forward those for
your approval soon.

- R
******************************************************************************
***********

Trading Megawatts On the Web: Houston Street Exchange
Launches First Fully Web-Based Trading Floor and Portal for
the Electric Power Industry

Business Wire - June 28, 1999 08:32
PORTSMOUTH, N.H.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 28, 1999-- HoustonStreet.com alters
power trading
landscape by increasing the efficiency of how power is bought and sold
Electric power. It's quickly becoming one of the world's largest traded
commodities, yet it's one of the last to be bought and sold over the
Internet. But that's about to change today when Houston Street Exchange
introduces HoustonStreet.com, a new online electric power trading floor that
allows power traders to buy and sell electricity faster and better than
before.
Houston Street Exchange hopes to do for the power industry what E
rade did for the stock market: turn the industry upside down by bringing
together buyers and sellers in a real-time, efficient online format. This
will shift the control of the $70 billion wholesale power market in the
United States by putting it directly into the hands of power marketers,
utilities and other traders that are entering the increasingly deregulated
energy market. HoustonStreet.com serves as a portal for power traders,
providing critical information regarding weather, energy news, stocks and
other direct links necessary for trading electricity. HoustonStreet.com is
pioneering the emerging business-to-business e-commerce power trading
market.
Lights out for phones, static Web sites
HoustonStreet.com delivers what has so far been elusive to the power trader:
an easy-to-use, fully Web-based trading floor that gives power traders all
the information and flexibility they need to post offers, make bids, counter
and re-counter instantaneously, until they close the deal.
Historically, power marketers have attempted to finalize deals while
juggling numerous phones and praying no one is undercutting their
transactions because they can't see a real-time picture of market pricing.
They lose precious time because they must call around to get the latest
market prices.  HoustonStreet.com eliminates that by giving power traders
instant access to current pricing fluctuations in different regional power
markets.
"The real-time environment of the Web naturally lends itself to trading
wholesale power," said Paul Messerschmidt, manager of Power Markets Services
at Energy Security Analysis, Inc. "But existing online products are
inflexible and they typically require proprietary hardware or software to
operate.  Until these issues are rectified, wholesale power trading online
will remain dormant. Houston Street Exchange is positioning itself as the
industry's wake-up call by providing a secure, reliable and flexible
platform that allows traders to trade power the same way they do today, but
more efficiently."
HoustonStreet.com enables traders to make deals based on the product and
term of their choice, providing them the flexibility to buy and sell the
same way they do now, only utilizing a much more efficient and easy-to-use
medium-the Internet.
"The leadership of Houston Street Exchange has a vision for changing the
power marketing industry" said Alan Herrick, senior vice president at
Sapient Corporation (NASDAQ: SAPE) the e-services consultancy that helped
create HoustonStreet.com. "They understand the importance of first-mover
advantage and the need to continually provide a world-class experience for
their targeted market.  Sapient is delighted to be Houston Street's
partner."
Built with power traders in mind
Designed by power traders for power traders, HoustonStreet.com enables users
to maintain total control over each transaction, view their complete trading
history, sort offers and bids by price, term, volume and delivery point, and
trade 24 hours a day, 365 days a year using an online service that ensures
the security and anonymity of each transaction.
Easy to access, navigate and use, HoustonStreet.com gives traders
up-to-the-second market information, allowing them to make the best deals at
the right time without having to leave the site.  Traders are able to
customize their Web page so they can see information that may impact
decisions on trading strategy such as updated weather reports, news
headlines about the energy industry and stock prices.
HoustonStreet.com provides users with the ability to enter their own
information regarding trading agreements and credit status without betraying
the anonymity of other parties. Knowing whether an enabling agreement is in
place and credit issues have been resolved beforehand gives a power marketer
a tremendous advantage in making split-second decisions.
Because of its ease of use and real-time environment, HoustonStreet.com will
allow power traders to make more transactions and become more efficient.
HoustonStreet.com will initially cover the Northeast regions (NEPOOL, PJM,
NY) and expects to roll out the remaining trading regions of the country
over the next several months.
"Wholesale power trading in the United States has grown by about 900 percent
since 1996. In 1998, more than 3.0 billion megawatt hours were traded, with
virtually all of it done over the telephone," said Frank Getman, Houston
Street Exchange's president and CEO. "We are redefining how power is traded
in the wholesale market, making it much more efficient and easy for power
marketers to buy and sell electricity. HoustonStreet.com represents a
powerful convergence of two major trends: growth of business-to-business
e-commerce and deregulation of the electric power industry."
About Sapient
Sapient Corporation is an innovative e-services consultancy. Through the
delivery of integrated services, from business strategy and organizational
transformation consulting through user-centered design and technology
implementation, Sapient helps emerging and evolving businesses transform
themselves into e-businesses. Founded in 1991, Sapient has experienced
strong and consistent revenue growth in each of the last eight years. The
company currently has more than 1,600 employees in offices in Cambridge,
Mass., the company's headquarters, as well as London, Sydney, New York, San
Francisco, Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas and Los Angeles. More information on
Sapient can be found at www.sapient.com.
About Houston Street Exchange
Designed by power traders for power traders, Houston Street Exchange has
developed the first Web portal for trading wholesale electric power.
HoustonStreet.com provides an online trading floor that allows power
marketers to trade power faster, more efficiently and more easily than they
do today.  Launched June 28, 1999, Houston Street Exchange is headquartered
in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.  Houston Street Exchange is a wholly owned
subsidiary of BayCorp Holdings, Ltd., (AMEX: MWH). For more information,
visit Houston Street at www.houstonstreet.com.
This press release contains forward-looking statements. There are a number
of important factors that could cause these forward-looking statements to be
materially inaccurate. These factors include, without limitation, that (i)
power traders may be unwilling or unable to use Internet-based power trading
systems, including HoustonStreet.com, (ii) HoustonStreet.com may not be able
to operate profitably, (iii) technological or systems outages could occur
and (iv) competitors with greater financial, marketing or other resources
could emerge. HoustonStreet.com is a registered service mark of Houston
Street Exchange. Sapient is a registered service mark of Sapient
Corporation.
CONTACT: Beaupre & Co. Public Relations, Inc.
Christa Branscombe, 603/559-5804


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Morris, Brandi
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:47 AM
To:	Smith, Mark
Subject:	FW: -- DJ Enron CEO -2: Also To Get Reimbursed For Tax Penalties --

UNBELIEVABLE

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Vakharia, Adarsh
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:42 AM
To:	Wilson, Shona; Wolfe, Stephen; Morris, Brandi; Wallace, Cassi; Thibodeaux, Kenneth
Subject:	-- DJ Enron CEO -2: Also To Get Reimbursed For Tax Penalties --

Interesting.....Is Lay going to retire????

-- DJ Enron CEO -2: Also To Get Reimbursed For Tax Penalties --

  WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--Enron Corp. (ENE) Chief Executive Kenneth Lay could
receive a lump sum payment as much as $80 million as a result of Dynegy Inc.'s
(DYN) plan to acquire Enron, according to a regulatory filing released Tuesday
by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  Under Lay's employment agreement, which originally extended through Dec. 31,
2003, Lay was entitled to a lump sum payment equal to the number of full
calendar years remaining under his contract multiplied by $20.2 million if he
terminated his employment within 60 days of a change of control.
  In August, Lay, chairman of Enron, resumed his position as CEO following the
resignation of Jeffrey K. Skilling, Enron's then-president and CEO. At that
time, his contract was extended to Dec. 31, 2005.
  In addition to the lump sum payment, Lay is entitled to an amount for any
related tax penalties if the payment were held to constitute an "excess
parachute payment," according to the filing.
  Dynegy plans to acquire Enron in a stock swap valued around $10.12 billion.
  The deal is expected to close sometime next year, in which case Lay is
entitled to $60.6 million under his contract if he terminates his employment
within the 60 days.
  Houston-based Enron is a utilities and communications company. -Dan Lowrey;
Dow Jones Newswires; 202-393-7402; dan.lowrey@dowjones.com

  (END) Dow Jones Newswires  13-11-01
  1428GMT(AP-DJ-11-13-01 1428GMT)

Symbols:
  US;DYN US;ENE

  13-Nov-2001  14:28:54 GMT
Source DJES   - Dow Jones Energy Service
Categories:
  I/ELC I/GAS I/UES I/XISL N/CNW N/DJWI N/DPG N/LNG N/NRG N/WEI M/NND M/UTI
  P/NRG R/NAPW R/NERC R/NME R/TX R/US R/USS MST/I/ELC MST/I/GAS MST/I MST/N/LNG
  MST/R/NME MST/R/US/TX MST/R/US