19:12:59 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Taylor, Mark E (Legal)'
19:12:59 Synchronizing Hierarchy
19:13:00 	   2 folder(s) updated in offline store
19:13:00 Synchronizing Favorites
19:13:00 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
19:13:11 	   17 item(s) added to offline folder
19:13:11 	   2 item(s) updated in offline folder
19:13:11 	   131 item(s) deleted in offline folder
19:13:11 	   1 view(s)/form(s) updated in offline folder
19:13:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
19:13:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
19:13:11 	   4 item(s) added to offline folder
19:13:11 	   7 item(s) deleted in offline folder
19:13:11 	   1 view(s)/form(s) updated in offline folder
19:13:11 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
19:13:14 	   3 item(s) added to offline folder
19:13:14 	   8 item(s) updated in offline folder
19:13:14 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
19:13:14 	   1 view(s)/form(s) deleted in offline folder
19:13:14 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
19:13:14 	   1 item(s) deleted in offline folder
19:13:14 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
19:13:14 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
19:13:14 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
19:13:14 Synchronizing Views
19:13:14 	   1 view(s)/form(s) added to offline folder
19:13:14 Synchronizing Forms
19:13:14 Done


Lunch (pizza!) will be provided on Friday, November 30, by Tim Belden and Chris Calger to everyone on the floor as a thanks for all you've done for Enron and your patience during this trying time.


In my absence on Friday, Dec. 10, please contact Susan Flynn (X30975) with
any questions.  Sara


IntercontinentalExchange
Firm Power Price Bulletin

For Power Delivered on Wednesday, October 24, 2001
(Trade Date of Tuesday, October 23, 2001)

Click here to access index history <http://www.intcx.com/SubscriberServlet/subscriberservlet.class?operation=powerIndexForm&hub=All>.

* volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	 High	 Low	 Wtd Avg Index	 Change ($)	 Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy	$28.50	$24.00	$26.90	+ 6.40	81,600
Comed	$26.50	$23.00	$24.25	+ 5.34	4,800
Entergy	$25.50	$22.70	$24.72	+ 2.62	20,000
Nepool	$38.70	$38.50	$38.56	+ 1.06	7,200
PJM-West	$27.50	$25.75	$26.35	+ 2.14	50,400
TVA	$30.50	$24.25	$27.38	+ 6.75	11,200

Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.

IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.

In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.   Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.

This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.

You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.

To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com <mailto:sales@intcx.com>.

To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe <http://www.intcx.com/subscribe.html>.

?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Latest information on CPUC Decision --

Commissioner Bilas filed an Alternative Draft for the CPUC that would:

*	hold DA suspension and have the CPUC conduct hearings that would work out details including impact on bonds and phasing ending of DA,
*	resolved issues related to credits and payments of Negative CTC, and
*	hold hearings dealing with bottoms-up ratemaking for DA.

This is effectively an updated version of the alternate that Bilas put out last time the CPUC considered this issue.  It is a long-shot that this alternative would be approved.

Our current information is still that the CPUC will vote to suspend DA as of Sept 1.

Jim


Please add to my calendar
---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 11/28/2000 09:08 AM
---------------------------

Peter E Weidler
11/27/2000 05:08 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Cuiaba Review

Rebecca has set Monday - Dec 4th at 3:00 PM (Houston time) for the meeting.
Can you all confirm your participation.   And let me know if you are going to
do the bullet point outlines.   I think it would be good to have this go as
smooth as possible.

Thanks
Pete
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron on 11/27/2000
05:05 PM ---------------------------

Peter E Weidler
11/26/2000 06:07 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Cuiaba Review

we can do this by phone.

Pete
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron on 11/26/2000
06:06 PM ---------------------------

Peter E Weidler
11/26/2000 05:59 PM
To: Laine A Powell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Richard A Lammers/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Cuiaba Review

Rebecca has asked for a review of the Cuiaba project.   Her current thinking
is that it should be under one shop - not split responsibility.   Which shop
is not clear to me - I presume this will be decided pretty soon.

The review will take place the week of Dec 4th.   She wants a straight
forward  decription of what is left to be done and what the issues are.  I am
thinking the presenters are Laine, Rick, Jose.  In attendance are Rob and
John.     Can divide the presentation up into -

getting the construction finished/cost issues/EECC - subcontractor issues. -
Laine
Furnas/Electrobras issues - Rick
YPF - gas supply - Mark to market position - opportunities - Rick
MAE/ONS issues - current thinking.  - Jose
Current economics. - Rick

Everyone should have a page prepared ahead of time with the discussion topics
on it - she doesn't want a detailed presentation - just the facts.   Can we
send the page per topic around by this friday.

I will ask Rebecca for two hours the week of the 4th and let you know.

Joe - we should talk about where the project should best end up - I think
Rebecca is flexible -   don't really know what Dave is thinking.

Pete


G$

Can you please prepare a confidentiality agreement for these folks - I
thought we would want to send our.

Call if you have questions.

Thanks

Stephanie
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Ward, Kim S.
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 3:24 PM
To: Miller, Stephanie
Subject: FW: Another Step in the Process

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Greg Lander" <glander@skippingstone.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Greg+20Lander+22+20+3Cglander+40skippingstone+2Ecom+3E+4
0ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 3:10 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: Another Step in the Process

Ms. Ward,

With respect to our potential transaction,  we are anticipating sending your
company financials and would typically have a confidentiality agreement with
respect to that disclosure.  I am attaching the Client's standard
Confidentiality Agreement.  It is my experience that suppliers typicall have
ones that they are comfortable with and prefer to sign their own.  If that
is the case, please ignore ours and send us yours.  If that is not the case,
please have ours reviewed and changes suggested so that we may forward to
you the information you will eventually need for credit purposes.  In
addition, if you have standard credit provisions or terms, please forward
those today or tommorrow so that we may prepare what we need to for your
review.

Greg Lander
Skipping Stone

 - Confidentiality Agreement1.doc


check with nowlan etc about this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000
04:42 PM ---------------------------

Patrick Danaher@ENRON
10/26/2000 02:50 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Schroeder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: mkt thoughts

How about tomorrow 10/27/00 @ 3:00 PM in room # 3143d?


Thank you for choosing Time Warner Road Runner as your high speed online
provider.  Your request has been received and it is currently being processed.
A customer service professional will be in contact with you within 48 hours.
While you wait, here are answers to some of the most commonly asked questions.

Q. If I am already a Road Runner customer what will happen to my account?

A. Your account will be transitioned to the new Enron billing system.  This
process is transparent to the end user.  The difference will be seen in your
monthly bill.  Keep in mind that there may still be prorated amount due on the
previous billing method.  Also, an account that is currently delinquent cannot
be transferred until the previous balance is paid in full.

Q. I?m not currently a Road Runner customer.  What is the process?

A. Your address will be checked to verify Road Runner serviceability.  If
serviceable, a customer service professional will contact you to set up an
appointment for a new install.  There are typically two time slot options a
customer may choose, 8am ? 12 noon or 1pm ? 5pm.

Q. Are there any installation charges?

A. All Enron customers will be charged a fee of $39.95 for a standard install
(network interface card not included).  Keep in mind that if you are getting
your computer through the Click at Home project, a network interface card is
already included.  A standard install is one that only required the installer
to
run the cable to an outside wall.  There are extra fees for a network
interface
card and running the cable between an inside wall.


Document attached.
This is the second of two emails.  See message for the first email.
 - SPP 01 Rstmt doc6 Nov18c2.DOC


Hey Brett,

Not too much going on in H-town.  I just recently started trading Natural Gas
Futures.  I have had three heart attacks, a stroke, and have bitten off all
of my fingers in a week.  Other than that things are going pretty well.

I should be in town for easter, so if you want to get together, lemme know.

How is artillery school going?

out

"Brett Lawler" <brettlawler@hotmail.com> on 03/06/2000 06:59:06 AM
To: John9375@aol.com, srhea@acm.org, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Arrrgh ye scurvy Dogs.

What's up me droogs?  Just checkin in to see how every thing was goin.

John how was New Orleans?  Sean and Eric what are you animals doin fer
easter?

Lemme know.

Lawler, OUT.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


I am working to get execution documents to you today.  However,  I am unable
to open previous e-mails sent by you.  Please give me a call or fax me this
info.  My fax number is 713-646-3490.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I will be out of the office Friday, Dec 28 and will return Wednesday, Jan 2.  Please leave me a voice mail at 713-345-7712 or contact Paul Radous, Wendy Conwell or Kortney Brown.


Steve:

You might also want to take a look at the  UK Minister for Trade and
Industry's speech at the same conference- I already sent it to Mark
Schroeder.

?Regards,

Lauren

(See attached file: UK Environment speech.doc)

From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 10/16/2000 09:25 PM

Sent by:  Steven J Kean@ENRON

To:   Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Kelly Kimberly/Enron
      Communications@Enron Communications, Lauren Goldblatt/NY/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject:  Fwd:Ford chairman calls climate change world's #1 issue

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/16/2000 09:25 PM -----

                    Cynthia
                    Sandherr            To:
                                        cc:
                    10/16/2000          Subject:
                    12:48 PM

Joe and Tom:  Either Bill Ford is a major Democrat or this signals a major
shift which serves as a strong indicator that Congress will face new
pressures next Congress to address Global Warming.  This is truly a
remarkable speech.

FORD PREDICTS END OF CAR POLLUTION
The Independent (UK)
6 October 2000

Internet:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/UK/Environment/2000-10/ford061000.shtml

The 100-year reign of the polluting internal combustion engine is coming to
an end, Bill Ford, chairman of the Ford Motor Company, said yesterday. It
will soon be replaced in motor vehicles by the hydrogen fuel cell, which
emits no pollution whatsoever and so can reduce the build-up of greenhouse
gases causing climate change, Mr. Ford, great-grandson of the company's
founder, Henry Ford, told the Greenpeace Business Conference in London.

In a remarkable speech from a motor manufacturer, in which he proclaimed
his
own environmental credentials, Mr. Ford, 43, accepted that the automobile
had
had a serious negative impact on the environment, and that his industry had
wrongly played down the threat from global warming.  And the head of the
world's second biggest car company raised eyebrows even further when he
said
that he could foresee the day when people would not want to own cars, but
merely have access to mobility.

Detroit-born Mr. Ford, who has been chairman since the start of last year,
proclaimed that climate change was the most challenging issue facing the
world and that anyone who disagreed was "in denial". Ford itself had moved
on
from that position, he said. But he felt the Kyoto protocol, the 1997 pact
in
which the industrialised nations agreed to try to limit their emission of
greenhouse gases, would not provide deep enough cuts to halt global
warming.
Only the marketplace, making new technology widely available, could tackle
the problem.

A fuel cell creates energy by an electrochemical process similar to that in
a
battery: it lets hydrogen and oxygen react together to produce electricity
and water vapour. It does not run down or need recharging, working as long
as
the hydrogen fuel is available, but most importantly, it does not produce
any
CO2, the basic by-product of any carbon-based fuel such as oil, gas or
coal.
Every major car company in the world is throwing huge sums into developing
the technology: Ford is spending $1bn (?690m) between now and 2004, while
Daimler-Chrysler, regarded as the leader in the field, has spent $700m. All
the main manufacturers have prototype fuel-cell cars running and there is a
race to bring them to market. Honda and Toyota expect to do so in 2003,
while
Ford and Daimler-Chrysler are aiming at 2004.

"I believe fuel cells will finally end the 100-year reign of the internal
combustion engine," Mr. Ford said, adding that the technology was "the holy
grail" of the motor industry. Prophesying the demise of car ownership, he
said:  "The day will come when the whole notion of car ownership is
antiquated," he said. Mr. Ford was reflecting advanced motor industry
thinking, which suggests many people might not want to pay for a car of
their
own if they could be guaranteed mobility on demand from a local hire
network.

 - UK Environment speech.doc


Attached you will find the summary on the Dec. 2 Task Force meeting,
Sub-Committe Re-Assignments, Meeting Schedule for 2000 and a Member Contact
List from Beth Tilney.


El Paso, Williams, or Duke

-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Burt [mailto:jburt1@txu.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:51 AM
To: Storey, Geoff
Subject: Re: Credit Ring

Sorry Geoff, I was out of the office Friday. Who is the third potential
counterparty? JB

"Storey, Geoff" <Geoff.Storey@ENRON.com> on 11/01/2001 04:00:30 PM

To:   Jerry Burt/BIZSRV/TXU@TXUE
cc:
Subject:  Credit Ring

Jerry,

Here would be the prosed trade:

For example:

Counterparty buys from Enron  jan02-dec02 nymex swap 350 contracts/mo
@ current market + $2
Enron buys from TXU           jan02-dec02 nymex swap 350contracts/mo @
current market + $2
TXU buys from Counterparty    jan02-dec02 nymex swap 350 contracts/mo
@ current market + $2

There will be no net position change for anyone. It lowers TXU's and the
Counterparty's open positions and VAR with Enron. It will also replace
the Counterparty's Enron credit exposure with TXU.

Enron releases TXU margin and TXU posts margin with the Counterparty
based on their contractual obligations.

All the trades would fall within our existing ISDAs. Our lawyers have
added some language for the confirms that would tie the trades together.
That language is included below. If you have any legal questions feel
free to call our lawyer Mark Taylor at 713-853-7459.

If you have any questions feel free to call me at 713-853-7058. I'll
ring you latter this afternoon to go over the details and talk about
possible counterparties.

Thanks for your time.

Geof Storey

"Each of the parties to this Agreement recognizes and acknowledges that
the parties are acting and agreeing to perform their obligations
hereunder in reliance upon (i) the timely execution and delivery by
[legal name of other counterparty] ("Third Party") and Party A of a
transaction in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A
("Third Party Transaction A") and would not otherwise agree to execute,
deliver and perform under this Agreement if Third Party and Party A were
not contemporaneously executing and delivering Third Party Transaction A
and (ii) the timely execution and delivery by Third Party and Party B of
a transaction in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B
("Third party Transaction B") and would not otherwise agree to execute,
deliver and perform under this Agreement if Third Party and Party B were
not contemporaneously executing and delivering Third party Transaction
B. The effectiveness of this Agreement shall be subject to the condition
that contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Agreement
Party A and Third Party execute and deliver Third Party Transaction A
and Party B and Third Party execute and deliver Third Party Transaction
B."

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may
contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for
the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message.
This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an
acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract
between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any
other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


The FINAL Violation Memos for 11/19/01 have been published and are available for viewing on the ERV: http:\\erv.corp.enron.com - Violation/Notification Memo Section.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lana Moore <Lana.Moore@nesanet.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:26 PM
Cc:	Staff
Subject:	NESA's "Explaining Storage Economics" Brown Bag

January 29, 2002

NESA MEMBERS:

Attached is our latest and greatest brown bag being held February 20, 2002.
Everyone that registers for this event by February 8, 2002, will be
automatically put into a drawing for Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo
tickets.  YEE-HAW!

Hope to see you there!

Lana Moore
Director of Education
NESA
(713) 856-6525

 <<Storage Economics.doc>>

 - Storage Economics.doc


Let's start over:

ISSUE 1-Mike Swerzbin
deal 524248 and deal 524266
This two deals checkout with Amerex fine.  Amerex has one deal at 50 mw and
we have two identical deals at 25 mw.

deal 524247
This deal checks out with Amerex fine.

The deal that I am missing is Enron buys from EES 25 mw of off-peak Mid-C for
Q3'01 at $285.95.

ISSUE 2- Mike Swerzbin
deal 524267
 Amerex has 50 mw and we have 25 mw.

ISSUE 3- Dianna Scholtes
deal 523984
Amerex has price as $345 and we have price as $335.

This has been a terrible ordeal and I will be so glad when everthing is
resolved!!!

Thanks
Evelyn

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/15/2001 06:10 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2/15 Amerex Checkout

I am missing the following deal:
Enron buys from EES 25 mw of off-peak Mid-C for Q3'01 at $285.95. - 524248 -
part of a spread sleeve done with EES and El Paso - only one broker fee
agreed upon - fee included on deal 524247 NOT 524248

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/15/2001 02:38 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2/15 Amerex Checkout

Jeff Richter
deal 523881
Per Amerex the term should be 2/17 only not 2/17-2/18

deal 523882
Per Amerex the term should be 2/17 only not 2/17-2/18

Matt Motley
deal 524143
Per Amerex the price should be $263 not $163

Mike Swerzbin
deal 524171
Per Amerex the price should be $300 not $310

deal 524172
Per Amerex the price should be $300 not $310

deal 524267
Per Amerex the total mw should be 50 not 25

deal 524310
Per Amerex the term should be March not April

I am missing the following deal:
Enron buys from EES 25 mw of off-peak Mid-C for Q3'01 at $285.95.


Major looked awesome, but I support the double QB idea. Why? Major lacks
mobility. A&M will eat his lunch if they can put pressure on him.

Dude,

No Le Hace was awesome. Do you remember the blonde name Jen with the big Ta
Tas. She got naked with about fifteen other people and was just walking
around and sliding down the slide that was available. Mingo came and almost
go laid again by this Shamu look a like. How was Cabo Wabo?

GT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [SMTP:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 6:10 PM
> To: Townsend, George
> Subject: Re: FW: Fw: AOL
>
>
> This message is BS.  What's up dude?  How was the game?  Looks like Major
> is the starter from now on.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                     "Townsend,
>
>                     George"               To:     Gerald
> Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'wayne fulton'" <jwf@flashmail.com>
>                     <gtownsend@man        cc:
>
>                     orisd.net>            Subject:     FW: Fw: AOL
>
>
>
>                     09/11/2000
>
>                     10:23 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> HEY GUYS. IS THIS STUFF BS OR WHAT? LET ME KNOW YOUR OPINION SO I DON'T
> MAKE
> AN ASS OUT OF MYSELF AND FORWARD THIS TO ANYONE ELSE.
>
> GT
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   carpenter, tobin
> > Sent:   Monday, September 11, 2000 9:59 AM
> > To:     battles, bill; galindo, julie; halderman, ralf; helton, debi;
> ivy,
> > larry; polski, mary beth; pormprasong, louis; shelby, jimmie; tamez,
> > daniel; Townsend, George
> > Subject:     FW: Fw: AOL
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   ross, deborah
> > Sent:   Monday, September 11, 2000 8:51 AM
> > To:     arnold, nikki; breaux, sherry; cameron, cathy; carpenter, tobin;
> > ellis, mike; galindo, julie; gutierrez, belinda; hauser, bonnie; havens,
> > liz; helton, debi; hyder, tarryl; krenek, david; lennon, priscilla;
> > polski, mary beth; lybecker, teri
> > Subject:     FW: Fw: AOL
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Deb Ross [SMTP:dross314@hotmail.com]
> > Sent:   Sunday, September 10, 2000 4:50 PM
> > To:     Rhonda2702@aol.com; elledger@laketravis.txed.net;
> > tinamartinez@maximus.com; Sharon_m_swan@uhc.com; cbraden@aol.com;
> > panama@centuryinter.net; AGolden519@aol.com; Wm1comp@aol.com;
> > dross@manorisd.net; djjones@dmg.maxinc.com; tx4tune@msn.com;
> > julbug@bellsouth.net; johnsonkc@earthlink.net; rpcnsb@aol.com;
> > Wendy.bagwell@thementornetwork.com
> > Subject:     Fwd: Fw: AOL
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "mary newcomb" <mnewcomb@tsixroads.com>
> > >To: "RICK NEWCOMB" <rnewcomb@tsixroads.com>, "robin"
> > <rturner172@aol.com>,
> > >       "Robin Turner" <rturner@sofamordanek.com>,        "Lyndsey
> > Newcomb"
> > ><lyndseyallison@hotmail.com>,        "DEB ROSS" <dross314@hotmail.com>,
> > >"Shanklin" <shanklin@tsixroads.com>
> > >Subject: Fw: AOL
> > >Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 18:55:31 -0500
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Carley Roberts <croberts@tsixroads.com>
> > >To: Janet Holley <bholley@tsixroads.com>; Daniel Mathis
> > ><dbmathis@swbell.net>; Denese Smith <CDS821@aol.com>; Jennifer
> Yarbrough
> > ><jcyarbrough@bcbsal.org>; Tammie Harvill <tharvi@tsixroads.com>;
> Christi
> > >Smith <titanic29@webtv.net>; Mary Newcomb <mnewcomb@tsixroads.com>;
> > Lyndsey
> > >Newcomb <lyndseyallison@hotmail.com>; Rick Newcomb
> > ><rnewcomb@tsixroads.com>;
> > >Joe Roberts <jroberts@tsixroads.com>; Robin Turner <rturner172@aol.com>
> > >Date: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:49 PM
> > >Subject: Fw: AOL
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: bobby wade holley <bholley@tsixroads.com>
> > > >To: carley roberts <croberts@tsixroads.com>
> > > >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 7:27 PM
> > > >Subject: Fw: AOL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: rick gray <rgray@avsia.com>
> > > >> To: BOBBY HOLLEY <bholley@tsixroads.com>; CRAIG RHODES
> > ><bayley@avsia.com>;
> > > >> GARY AUSTIN <gcaustin@usit.net>; jessie godwin
> > > >> <jsgodwin@freedom2000net.com>; JOE RINEHART
> <VAGABOND@tsixroads.com>;
> >
> > >ROY
> > > >> WRIGHT <wroy@tsixroads.com>; STAN <popfly@freedom2000net.com>;
> SHERRY
> > >GRAY
> > > >> <sgray@fleetwoodretail.com>; steve tucker <steventucker@avsia.com>;
> > TIM
> > > >> BARNES <tbarnes@avsia.com>; tony fondren <tonyf@usit.net>; will
> > > >> <willdeb@tsixroads.com>
> > > >> Date: Thursday, September 07, 2000 6:13 PM
> > > >> Subject: Fw: AOL
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >----- Original Message -----
> > > >> >From: "Nathan Voeller" <voeller@uswest.net>
> > > >> >To: <AHen855423@aol.com>; "Tiffany" <amanda.dixon.@us.zurich.com>;
> > >"Barb
> > > >> >Stoxen" <barbi111@yahoo.com>; "Bryan Haag" <bdmm@uswest.net>;
> "Brad
> > or
> > > >> >Debbie Fuller" <blfuller@boink.net>; "bryan radin"
> > > ><nbradin@email.msn.com>;
> > > >> >"Cammy Bosch" <cbosch@peoplepc.com>; <CheneyLane@gateway.net>;
> > >"Christy
> > > >> >Huerta" <HuertaC@cookministries.org>; "curt kressley"
> > > >> ><mrdiagnle@prodigy.net>; "Donavan" <dvoeller@pioneer.state.nd.us>;
> > > >> >"douglasm1" <douglasm1@email.msn.com>; "Drewbears"
> > > >> ><Drewbears@email.msn.com>; "Dwight Wangen" <DWangen@webtv.net>;
> > > >"Elizabeth
> > > >> >Mason" <lizard31@home.com>; "Erlene Heupel" <eheupel@mohs.org>;
> > "Faith
> > > >> >Voeller" <lil_chicn@yahoo.com>; "Jeff Case" <jeffcase@dwx.com>;
> "Jo
> > >Ann
> > > >> >Pritchett" <jpritchett@lightspeed.net>; "Joan Voeller"
> > > >> ><voeller@btigate.com>; "John Voeller" <dirtboy17@hotmail.com>;
> > "Laura
> > > >> >DeOrnellas" <lauradeo@one-eleven.net>; <MadiMorg@aol.com>; "mande"
> > > >> ><soccermom@atlnet.com>; "Mary Freisz" <maryf@btigate.com>;
> > > >> ><Mtsothmoon@aol.com>; "Neomi" <neomiv@dwx.com>; "Nicole Voeller"
> > > >> ><nicole_voeller@educ8.org>; <NVoeller12@MSN.com>; "Sandy"
> > > >> ><jpritchett@dellnet.com>; <Stephi711@aol.com>; <SusZooo@aol.com>;
> > >"Tarryn
> > > >> >Soberg" <tarrynsoberg@hotmail.com>; "Tad" <tjp4460@dellnet.com>
> > > >> >Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 9:01 AM
> > > >> >Subject: Fw: AOL
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> >>>
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> Let's hope it works,  if it doesn't..no loss
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> To all of my friends, I do not usually forward
> > messages
> > > >but
> > > >> >> this
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> is from my good friend Pearlas Sanborn and she
> really
> >
> > >is
> > > >an
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> attorney.....If she says that this will work - it
> > WILL
> > > >work.
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> After all,what have you  got to lose?
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> SORRY EVERYBODY.....JUST HAD TO TAKE THE CHANCE!!!
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>>  I'm an attorney, and I know the law. This thing is
> > for
> > > >> real.
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> Rest assured, AOL and Intel will follow through
> with
> > >their
> > > >> >> > promises
> > > >> >> > > >for
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> fear of  facing multimillion dollar class action
> suit
> > > >> similar
> > > >> >> to
> > > >> >> > > >the
> > > >> >> > > >one
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> filed by Pepsico against General Electric not too
> > long
> > > >ago.
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> We're not going to help them out with their e-mail
> > beta
> > > >test
> > > >> >> > > >without
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> getting a little something for our time. My
> brother's
> > > >> >> girlfriend
> > > >> >> > > >got
> > > >> >> > > >in
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> on this a few months ago. When I went to visit him
> > for
> > >the
> > > >> >> > > >Baylor/UT
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> game,she showed me her check. It was for the sum of
> > > >> $4,324.44
> > > >> >> and
> > > >> >> > > >was
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> stamped "Paid In Full". Like I said before, I know
> > the
> > > >law,
> > > >> >and
> > > >> >> > > >this
> > > >> >> > > >is
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> for real. If you don't believe me you can email her
> > at
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> jpiltman@baylor.edu.  She's eager to answer any
> > >questions
> > > >> you
> > > >> >> > guys
> > > >> >> > > >might
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> have.
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> Intel and AOL are now discussing a merger which
> would
> > >make
> > > >> >them
> > > >> >> > the
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> largest Internet company and in an effort make sure
> > >that
> > > >AOL
> > > >> >> > > >remains
> > > >> >> > > >the
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> most widely used program, Intel and AOL are running
> > an
> > > >> e-mail
> > > >> >> > beta
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> test.  When you forward this e-mail to friends,
> Intel
> >
> > >can
> > > >> and
> > > >> >> > will
> > > >> >> > > >track
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> it (if you are a Microsoft Windows user) for a two
> > week
> > > >time
> > > >> >> > > >period.
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> For every person that you forward this e-mail to,
> > > >Microsoft
> > > >> >> will
> > > >> >> > > >pay
> > > >> >> > > >you
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> $203.15.  For every person that you sent it to that
> > > >forwards
> > > >> >it
> > > >> >> > on,
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> Microsoft will pay you $156.29 and for every third
> > >person
> > > >> >that
> > > >> >> > > >receives
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> it, you will be paid $17.65. Within two weeks,
> Intel
> > >will
> > > >> >> contact
> > > >> >> > > >you
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> for your address and then send you a check. I
> thought
> > >this
> > > >> >was
> > > >> >> a
> > > >> >> > > >scam
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> myself, but a friend of my good friend's Aunt
> > Patricia,
> > > >who
> > > >> >> works
> > > >> >> > > >at
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> Intel actually got a check for $4,543.23 by
> > forwarding
> > > >this
> > > >> >> > e-mail.
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>> Try it, what have you got to lose????
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>>
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>
> > > >> >> > > > >  >>
> > > >> >> > > > >  >Melissa J. Haahr
> > > >> >> > > > >  >Business Manager
> > > >> >> > > > >  >Northwood Public School
> > > >> >> > > > >  >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > > >
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > > >_______________________________________________________
> > > >> >> > > >Say Bye to Slow Internet!
> > > >> >> > > >http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html
> > > >> >> > > >
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >>
> > >
> > >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > > >> >> > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> > > >> >> http://www.hotmail.com.
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > > Share information about yourself, create your own public
> > profile
> > >at
> > > >> >> > > http://profiles.msn.com.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> http://www.hotmail.com.
> >
> > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> > http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>


I didn't get a good response from the one person I know in IT.  So I am
sending your resume out for some IT jobs I see posted on our intranet and
have asked for help from the HR dept.  I didn't think this would take so
long.  I appologize, but I am still trying.

DG

Stewart McAdoo <smcadoo@ev1.net> on 08/10/2000 08:02:37 PM
To: "Darron C Giron" <Darron.C.Giron@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Resume

Just a quick follow up.  Any word? What would you say the prospects
are for visiting with someone about employment?

Our plans are set for Sept.  We have airline and hotel reservations.

Stewart

At 02:17 PM 7/26/00 -0500, you wrote:

>I did get your message and resume.  I am waiting for a return call from a
>person
>in our IT group.  I'll let you know what he says.
>
>DG
>


Since Lisa used fuchsia, I'll use lavender..

On # 1 I would eliminate that processing. In addition, can we delete/hide/not access old paths that haven't been used in gas production in lets say a year or so. Would this help performance?  This would also force the schedulers to path/think about the way they are pathing their transactions and not rely on old paths that may no longer be accurate!! We've seen old bad, zero paths be re-used accidentally.
On # 2, The scheduling position window IS the weakest link.....GOODBYE!
On # 3, Contract Reference I know is used alot in the supply and market list. Nomlogic is also slated to use these contract reference fields for comments. Do we need it in the inventory list?  Probably not as much as the supply and market list but I still believe it's necessary for pools and imbalance accounts.
On # 4, We use this functionality alot on CGAS, TENN, TRCO and SAB...When we path one to many or many to one in "chunks," it does seem to go faster than one path at a time.
On # 5,  Brokered paths could really just be slammed in there. No need for the extra processing that occurs for service contracts .
THANKS
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sullivan, Patti
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 9:50 AM
To:	Pena, Matt
Cc:	Warner, John; Ripley, Brian; D'Souza, Romeo; Rao, Ramesh; Lamadrid, Victor; Sullivan, Mary; Staab, Theresa; Farmer, Daren J.; Jaquet, Tammy; Superty, Robert; Bussell l, Kathryn; Kinsey, Lisa; Heal, Kevin; Pinion, Richard
Subject:	RE: Path Manager Rewrite / Optimization project

I also agree with Richard and Lisa.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heal, Kevin
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 9:28 AM
To:	Kinsey, Lisa; Pinion, Richard; Pena, Matt
Cc:	Warner, John; Ripley, Brian; D'Souza, Romeo; Rao, Ramesh; Lamadrid, Victor; Sullivan, Mary; Sullivan, Patti; Staab, Theresa; Farmer, Daren J.; Jaquet, Tammy; Superty, Robert; Bussell l, Kathryn
Subject:	RE: Path Manager Rewrite / Optimization project

I agree with Richard and Lisa.  Especially important is to keep #4.  We do a lot of many to one and one to many pathing, especially on Nova.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kinsey, Lisa
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:56 PM
To:	Pinion, Richard; Pena, Matt
Cc:	Warner, John; Ripley, Brian; D'Souza, Romeo; Rao, Ramesh; Lamadrid, Victor; Sullivan, Mary; Sullivan, Patti; Heal, Kevin; Staab, Theresa; Farmer, Daren J.; Jaquet, Tammy; Superty, Robert; Bussell l, Kathryn
Subject:	RE: Path Manager Rewrite / Optimization project

My comments are in fuschia.
Lisa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pinion, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 2:35 PM
To:	Pena, Matt
Cc:	Warner, John; Ripley, Brian; D'Souza, Romeo; Rao, Ramesh; Kinsey, Lisa; Lamadrid, Victor; Sullivan, Mary; Sullivan, Patti; Heal, Kevin; Staab, Theresa; Farmer, Daren J.; Jaquet, Tammy; Superty, Robert; Bussell l, Kathryn
Subject:	RE: Path Manager Rewrite / Optimization project

Following are my comments.  The managers cc'd might have some additional thoughts.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pena, Matt
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 4:26 PM
To:	Pinion, Richard; Jaquet, Tammy; Superty, Robert; Pena, Matt
Cc:	Warner  , John ; Ripley, Brian; D'Souza, Romeo; Rao, Ramesh
Subject:	Path Manager Rewrite / Optimization project
Importance:	High

All:

We're currently identifying processes that are inefficient and could possibly benefit from being rewritten or not even performed.  Going foward, I would like Bob to appoint a lead business person to whom we could ask questions and or suggest ideas to so that they could in turn validate this information with the desk managers/schedulers.  We had this approach with Nomlogic and having Clarissa work the issues worked quite nicely.  Who ever you choose, we would need about 15% of their time for now.  Later on, with coordination efforts and testing, it may go up to 75%.  I don't see that happening for a while though.

The sooner we get someone to devote to this, the better off we will be.  I expect these changes that we'll be looking into should improve performance quite a bit.

That being said, we've identified three items that would speed up processing the retrieval of Path Manager.

1)  Currently, the Path Manager attempts to reuse Path Ids.  I can't think of any reason why we need to perform this extra step?    It runs through this processing on the application and generally doesn't find a match.  I know Patti has mentioned this several times and I can't think of a valid reason for performing this work.  I talked with Dave Nommensen, and according to him, what used to happen is that sometimes schedulers would get duplicate paths out there which is why they put this code in place???  From a scheduling perspective, my understanding of what your main concern is to just maintain your position and be able to change it.  If you were overpathed, you'd see it in the Path Manager either way. [Pinion, Richard]    To restate the question for clarity, in path manager a scheduler pulls down a supply, market and a service, adds any up/downstream contract information and/or Duns or DRN override and then saves it.  Unify looks for an old path with those exact variables and if it finds it re-uses it and if it does not find an exact match creates a new path and path id.  I had been told that to do away with this function would create an unacceptably high amount of paths since any path once nominated on could not be deleted.  Has this changed???  At one time there were some schedulers that looked for the same path / activity number match for nominations.  Texas Eastern was the only pipeline that needed the old activity numbers no matter how long it had been since they were used.  I spoke with Chris Ordway and the new LINK system no longer needs this to occur.  Transco uses activity numbers but uses the Activity number cross reference table to that function and therefore should not be affected.  Therefore, if it does not create a space or memory problem for Unify, I don't think that this constant old path look up is needed.   [Kinsey, Lisa]   Get rid of this.

2)  The scheduling position window:  does anyone use this?  If not, we'll remove the code logic that populates this window.  I have never seen a scheduler use this.  Please verify. [Pinion, Richard]   Originally such a window was in use by everyone in the legacy system "Autonoms" so it was duplicated in Unify by request.  It is not used in Unify now because of the other sophisticated tools Unify provides which obviate it's use.  The only value would be notification of bridge errors or contract imbalances but there are other ways to determine those problems.  As voted on in a previous meeting of the managers - Lose it!  [Kinsey, Lisa]  Why is this still here?

3)  On the inventory pool list, does anyone need to see the Contarct References List?  Again, this code is called every retrieval time and doesn't appear to be used from my observations.   If they do need this information, we could provide it, but if not, I'd prefer to remove the functionality. [Pinion, Richard]    This function is still very much in use by those with point based pipelines that must use the imbalance pool to facilitate balancing nomination volumes where multiple pipeline external pools exist and are pathed through the same contract imbalance pool.  Keep it!  [Kinsey, Lisa]  Yes.  We use this functionality a lot when pathing pools.

4)  When pathing a one to many or many to one set of paths, what's the average number of paths they create at one time?  What about updates?  I know that ANR and NIGAS are big users of this feature since they have small packages of gas that they are limited in size to.  Does the system seem faster when you update one record at a time or chunks of records?  My real question is how often they do this and for what number of paths on both Updates and Inserts.  By update, I mean, going to the path list and changing an upstream / downstream contract or a PSNA which in turn forces a new path to be created. [Pinion, Richard]    This one to many or many to one pathing goes on every day on every pipeline.  There is no 'average'.  They typically update a path with up/downstream meters or duns or dnb numbers one at a time however.  I hope this answers your question.  I see no change to this process at this time  [Kinsey, Lisa]  On some pipes this function is used more than others.  When it is used we try and do as many paths as possible.  At this time I do not see a need to change this process.

5)  On brokered paths, do you want to utilize the same logic we have for Service?  In other words, when updating Brokered arrangements, we don't incorporate the same logic for zeroing out the path and recreating a new arrangment link and hence sending it to be renominated?  Why do we do this for service?  Is it because we have to renominate it?  I assume that's what it's for since we don't send brokered paths to the pipe.  Anyway, with the Nomlogic implmentation (two way interface), we were planning on having it behave the same way as service.  We need this verified. [Pinion, Richard]    We don't perform the same logic for Brokered paths because these are not nominated to the pipeline and hence do not need a zero path to be resent to the pipeline when a significant change is made to the already nominated path.  I don't see a need to change the way Brokered paths are behaving at this time. [Kinsey, Lisa]  Agree with Richard.


The following new hire Analysts (commercial side) have been placed in their
first rotation:

Analyst  Business Unit     Supervisor
Alberto Crespo  Commercial Transactions   Chris Helfrich
Niclas Egmar  Enron Research    Ronnie Chahal
Aaron Martinsen EES Account Operations & Process  Julian Travis
Mike Spuriell  EES Account Operations & Process  Julian Travis
John Weakly  Risk Management for Equity & Debt Trading Bennett Kauffman
Adrian Woolcock EES Gas Structuring    Debra Merril

Samuel Pak - He came in on the support side, but has been given a commercial
role with Global Exploration & Production Steve Harper

Zeina El-Azzi has received an offer from the Commercial Transactions group,
but has not yet accepted because she is waiting on an offer from the Middle
Eastern Development group.

Ben Thomason has received three offers (Capital Structuring, APACHE
Transaction Services, and Commercial Transactions)-  He is making a decision
by the end of tomorrow.

Rahul Seksaria - He is interviewing with Larry Lawyer's group in ECI tomorrow.

The following Analysts on the commercial support side have been placed as
indicated below:
Michael Benien  Business Analysis & Reporting   Norman Levine
Jody Crook  Gas Assets     Steve Venturatos
Israel Estrada  Global Rate Services    Mary Solmonson
Sharon Hausinger EES Commercial Risk Management  Barry Vanderhorst
Jennifer Keith  EES Financial Operations   Patrick Hanes
Christine Milliner Corporate HR     Suzanne Brown
Justin O'Malley  EES Gas Commodities    David Draper
Adnan Patel  Global Counterparty    Mary Gosnell
Lauren Schlesinger EES Financial Planning    Matt Culver
Shirley Sidler  Global Products    Scott Earnest
Leah Stephens  Global Products    Kevin Sweeney
George Thomas Business Analysis & Reporting   Jody Pierce

Shilpa Chunchu - interviewing with groups
Angie Zeman - interviewing with groups

The following new hire Associate has been placed as indicated below:
Russell Dyk  Mid-Markets Trading    Jenn Fraser

Juan Cabrales - He has been extended two offers (Panama group and
Structuring).  He is to make decision by Friday.


thank ;you very much

Kam Keiser
05/08/2001 01:20 PM
To:	Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	TDC

Nelson,

I have booked the TDC deal for the remainder of the term.  It is now in the Gulf3 book at Tenn/Zone1.  If locations need to change, and I'm sure they will, please let me know and I will make sure it is hedged correctly.

sitara #778201

also,  if you could use the same sitara number every month for the central gas it would help make our reconciliation process much smoother.

Thanks,

Kam


Thanks Mark - everything looks great.
Please forward to Cygnifi for review/comment; the contact there is:

Cynthia Cheswick
(212) 485-3241
cynthia_cheswick@cygnifi.com

Thanks,
Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Greenberg, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:55 PM
To: Cruver, Brian
Cc: Jones, Tana; Young, Kay; O'Connell, Denis
Subject: Cygnifi Non-Disclosure Agreement

Brian -

Attached is the Cygnifi non-disclosure agreement marked to reflect my
comments.  Please take a look at this when you have a chance, if all is in
order, I will be happy to forward to Cygnifi for review and comment.

 << File: nda-cygnifi(enron comments).doc >>

Mark
Senior Counsel, EWS
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3490
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Please review the attached letters and provide me with any comments.

Thanks.


What do you want to drink?  I think Greg (Corinnes husband) is
getting a Keg, Scotch and alot of wine!  I have wine and Vodka at my
house (gotta have a pre-party cocktail), so if you want something
else tell me now!!  Other than that, I am bringing Brie, and I think
that will cover our part.  If you can't get ahold of me Saturday
afternoon, call my cell, because Greg cannot drive and I have to take
him on some errands for the party.
--
NGFC, tcooper@ngfc.com on 17/10/2001


I have advised against Ken or Jeff attending the generators meeting:  Ken is
still willing to make time avail on the 3d to meet with the gov.

From: Susan M Landwehr on 04/29/2001 05:04 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: ken lay tour

All--here's some thoughts on the RGA related events.  We currently have Ken
scheduled to participate in an energy roundtable discussion on the afternoon
of the 2nd with at least four governors attending that session--Kempthorne,
Hull, Geringer and Ridge.  (Engler and Rowland are also attending the overall
event, but they will be in a healthcare breakout session).  Kaufman and I
thought that it would be particularly helpful for Arizona Gov Hull and Idaho
Gov Kempthorne to hear Ken's remarks and have a chance to talk with him.

I have also been working with Rosalee to schedule an early evening
(6:00-7:00pm) meeting that night  with Exelon co CEO John Rowe. John Rowe
will be in California for some investor meetings and well as attending some
sections of the RGA events.  I have told my counterpart at Rowe's office that
we would confirm Ken's availability on Monday morning.

If you do decide that Ken should attend the Davis meeting in Sacremento that
day instead, we will just reconfigure a bit.  Paul and I will cover the RGA
events and I will cancel the John Rowe get together. I would also want to
talk about having Mr. Lay reach out to Hull and Kempthorne via phone sometime
in the near future.  Same with Rowe.

	Rosalee Fleming
	04/27/2001 07:12 PM

		 To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: ken lay tour

I received a return call from Lelanie in Governor Davis' office this
evening.  She said the Governor wanted to invite Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling to
a meeting the Governor is having at 2:00 p.m. in Sacramento on May 2 with a
lot of CEOs.  I still pressed for a one on one meeting on May 3 in
Sacramento, but she told me the Governor wanted to have the one meeting all
at once and his schedule was very tight on Thursday, May 3.   I transferred
her to Sherri and called Ken.  Ken wanted me to try to get more specific
information, which she shared that it is with generators - Sempra, Williams,
CalPine, Duke, Dynegy, and Reliant.  She also said since the Governor has
worked with Ken, she thought he might prefer that he attend.  Ken said to let
you all know and be thinking whether we even want to do it.  He said one
thought might be that he'd do that meeting and maybe Jeff could do the one in
L.A. on May 2.

Talk to you Monday.

Rosie

Janel Guerrero
04/27/2001 02:39 PM
To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: ken lay tour

Just so we're all on the same page......Dasovich will arrive in Houston on
Monday (mid-day) and will travel with Dr. Lay beginning on Wednesday (to
Austin) and then on to LAX, Sacramento etc.  Steve said there really isn't
time to have a pre-briefing so any questions that Ken has will have to be
addressed enroute to CA.

Rosalee....we're giving Steve the briefing book today so he can review over
the weekend and we'll have a final copy to Ken before he departs next week.


Concur.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fossum, Drew
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:59 AM
To:	Gadd, Eric; McCarty, Danny; Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Miller, Mary Kay; Place, Janet
Subject:	ANNGTC Confidentiality Agreement

I have reviewed the ANNGTC confidentiality agreement (the two page letter agreement included in the package) and have several comments.  I've attempted to briefly explain the basis for each change in brackets after the change.  I'm circulating these by this email so you all can jump in if you have further comments.  Please give me a call if you have any questions or comments.  DF

--in the second paragraph, line 2, after "concerning" add: ", without limitation,"  [I don't know exactly what the disputed issues under the old partnership agreement are at this time, and don't want this signed letter agreement used as a basis for someone's claim that we've waived an argument.]

--second paragraph, lines 4-9:  delete the sentence beginning with "Furthermore" and ending with "Partnership."  [This sentence serves no purpose but to assert an interpretation of section 4.4.4 of the Partnership Agreement.  Since that section apparently (Foothills and Westcoast believe) limits the rights of the withdrawn partners, I'd prefer to let section 4.4.4  speak for itself and not have us sign any documents that arguably endorse any parties' interpretation of that language.]

--page 2, line 1:  after "(b) your" add:  "execution of this agreement and".  [I'd like to broaden our protection so our signing of this letter agreement cannot be argued to constitute a waiver of any argument or otherwise compromise our position.]

--page 2, Section 2.(c), line1:  after the words "not be used" add:  "by the Receiving Party".  [Any party that currently has information should be able to use that information for any purpose it wants in the future--including as evidence in a fight about the Partnership Agreement.  That should be true whether the party having such information chooses to disclose it to someone else under this letter agreement or not.   The restriction on use should be limited to that information that a party obtains solely due to another parties' disclosure pursuant to this letter agreement.  I suspect that's what they intended, but it needs clarification.]


Chris, I got your message.  I am very happy how you are coming out!  I think
it is a great opportunity for both you and the company!  Please work through
the move and comp questions with Julia.  Of course I will be available as
needed.

Mark


Eileen, our Gas Control records indicate the following rate changes for March
26, 2001 flow:
20,000 rate 0900 to 1400 (5hrs);
40,000 rate 1400 to 0100 (11hrs)
Nom. for the day:  22,500 MMBTU.
Please call me to see if we can agree on the total nom.
I can be reached at 214-812-4404.

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 03/27/2001 09:39:00 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM,
LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject:  NOMS/ACTUAL VOLS FOR 3/26/01

NOM       MCF       MMBTU
24,167         21,820         22,409

BTU = 1.027

NOTE:  No changes to flow rates for 3/23 thru 3/25.............


Below you will find the list of employees that you have been slated to
represent at the Global Accounting PRC on Tuesday, June 27.  This list was
compiled based on information available.  If you have additions and delitions
please send them to me.

Also, please send me your -re-rating of these individuals.  We need this
information on Friday, June 23 if possible.  This should expedite the meeting.

The ratings are Superior, Execllent, Strong, Statisfactory, Needs Improvement
and Issues.


Looks good

	Mark Palmer
	09/27/2000 02:09 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Dereg Articles

Here's the draft that Allegretti is sending.
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 09/27/2000 02:09 PM -----

	Mark Palmer
	09/26/2000 04:08 PM

		 To: Daniel Allegretti/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Dereg Articles

I've taken the editor's pencil to Dan's draft.  Here's the result:

 Kirk Johnson's September 26th article, Debate on Need for New Power Plants
Ignores Conservation, leaves readers with the misperception that competitive
electricity markets discourage conservation.  True customer choice proves
otherwise.
 My company supplies electricity to a number of businesses in Maine.  One of
these customers is a  paper mill that uses more electricity than thousands of
homes.  When New England power prices temporarily spiked last May, we
actually paid the mill to shut down ... which they were more than happy to
do.  As a result, the customer made money, the grid worked better, and
residential customers didn't hear a word about "brownouts."
 The financial rewards in the open market create much better incentives to
conserve than do the bureaucratic, one-size-fits-all programs of the
regulatory elite.  It's proving true in Maine, why not give New York and
other states the same choice?

Dan Allegretti
Enron Corp.

If you like it, send it to the Letters to the Editor section at the New York
Times.  The protocol is on the editorial page.

Thanks for the quick response,

Mark


Yes, but you would have to track down all those people.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           01/22/2001 12:05 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Resignations of CAED I & II Man. Dir. & Officers

Kay,

I don't know if you opened the attached document, but George has done
everything for us.  All we need to do is get the letters signed.

K-

Kay Mann
01/22/2001 10:12 AM
To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Resignations of CAED I & II Man. Dir. & Officers

Could you let me know how many there are, so I'll know how we want to handle
this.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/22/2001 10:10
AM ---------------------------

"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com> on 01/19/2001 06:14:02 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com, CCampbell@KSLAW.com

Subject: Resignations of CAED I & II Man. Dir. & Officers

Kay,

Please have the appropriate managing directors and officers of CAED I
and CAED II execute the attached resignations and return the executed
resignations to Doug Pedigo.  If any other persons were manging
directors or officers of CAED I or CAED II prior to closing, please have
them execute similar resignations and furnish them to Doug.  Thanks.

George

 - 5bx_j01_.DOC


Sara,

This relates to the Enron Re receivable (Bob Bruce is handling for Enron Re). Any ideas where Brent's files on this might be? Thanks in advance. DEC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Berryman, Kyle
Sent:	Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:42 AM
To:	Carolan, Dominic
Cc:	Tawney, Mark
Subject:	$4m receivable

Dominic,

The files belonging to Brent Hendry should contain the information regarding the SMUD transaction.

I would appreciate access to these files to build a file for the weather desk as we don't have records for this transaction.

Also, could you also please cc Mark Tawney and myself on correspondence regarding the weather desk so that we remain informed and can assist where necessary.

Regards,

Kyle R. Berryman
Weather Risk Management
Enron Global Markets

Tel 713-853-1704
Cell 713-301-2615


Start Date: 3/8/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030808.txt


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Danz, Suzanne
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 9:54 AM
To:	Bibi, Philippe A.; Blachman, Jeremy; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Brown, Michael; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Cline, Wade; Cox, David; Delainey, David; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Elliott, Steve; Fallon, Jim; Fastow, Andrew; Frevert, Mark; Glisan, Ben; Hannon, Kevin; Hayslett, Rod; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Kean, Steven; Kitchen, Louise; Koenig, Mark; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; Leff, Dan; McCarty, Danny; McConnell, Mike; McDonald, Rebecca; McMahon, Jeffrey; Metts, Mark; Muller, Mark; Olson, Cindy; Pai, Lou; Piper, Greg; Rice, Ken; Scrimshaw, Matthew; Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Sherrick, Jeffrey; Sherriff, John; Skilling, Jeff; Sunde, Marty; Whalley, Greg; Adams, Jennifer; Armstrong, Julie; Blackwood, Connie; Bob, Vanessa; Bolen, Vivianna; Brelsford, Loretta; Brown, Carol Ann; Burns, Jennifer; Campos, Kathy; Carter, Rebecca; Chapman, Kay; Dalton, Dorothy; Danz, Suzanne; Dauterive, Inez; Davidson, Binky; Daw, Nicki; Dick, Sharon; Dodgen, Kathy; Estrada, Mercedes; Ferrari, Kerry; Fisher, Dolores; Fleming, Rosalee; Ford, Sue; Gadade, Mrudula; Garcia, G.G.; Grow, Christina; Harris, Stephanie J; Hawkins, Linda; Heathman, Karen K.; Hillis, Kimberly; Hinojosa, Esmeralda; Johnson, Kelly; Maronge, Bridget; Marshall, Lucy; McCurley, Peggy; McMahon, Kathy; McVicker, Maureen; Moffett, Carol; Owens, Karen; Paxton, Jana L.; Phillips, Cathy; Rapacioli, Marisa; Rijo, Leah; Schiller, Marsha; Schoppe, Tammie; Sera, Sherri; Spiller, Tina; Stark, Cindy; Taylor, Liz; Urquhart, Lauren; Wells, Tori L.; Westbrook, Sharron; Williamson, Joannie
Subject:

Executive Committee Weekly Meeting

Date:		Tuesday, May 29
Time:		11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location:	50th Floor Boardroom
Video:		Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf. Call:	AT&T lines have been reserved.  Please contact Sherri Sera (713/853-5984) or
		Suzanne Danz (713/853-6440) for the weekly dial-in number and passcode.

Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and through what medium.

Yes, I will attend in person		___X___

By video conference from		______

By conference call			______

No, I will not attend			______

Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday, May 25.

Thank you,
Suzanne


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2000 08:53 AM -----

	"Hoog, David T TL16" <David.Hoog@ACE-INA.com>
	06/05/2000 07:56 AM

		 To: "'Bill.Windle@enron.com'" <Bill.Windle@enron.com>
		 cc: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com, Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com,
Leslie.Hansen@enron.com, Gaurav.Babbar@enron.com, Savitabi@llgm.com,
jmcgreevy@llgm.com, sbehrend@llgm.com
		 Subject: RE: policy

 <<EnronPolicy.doc>> \
i was in a hurry to get out friday night, so i didnt reply to all.  this is
a clean version of same.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill.Windle@enron.com [SMTP:Bill.Windle@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 5:12 PM
> To: Hoog, David T TL16
> Cc: dhoog@att.net; Carol.St.Clair@enron.com; Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com;
> Leslie.Hansen@enron.com; Gaurav.Babbar@enron.com; Savitabi@llgm.com;
> jmcgreevy@llgm.com; sbehrend@llgm.com
> Subject: Re: policy
>
>
> David,
>
> Unfortunately we were unable to accept all changes. Would you please
> forward a clean copy of the draft policy to those listed above (cc).
> Thanks.
>

 - EnronPolicy.doc


FYI
----- Forwarded by Barton Clark/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 10:07 AM -----

	Scott Healy
	08/24/2000 12:09 PM

		 To: Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fuel Cells

Jeff just told me that we do need a draft 1) development agreement and 2)
construction MOU.  Attached is my outline.  Can a draft be prepared in this
timetable?


fyi, of the 12 participants, we've briefed reps from three of the companies
(Exodus, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Wal-Mart), plus Dick Riordan....
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/25/2001
05:10 PM ---------------------------

Sandra Yamane <SYamane@marathon-com.com> on 05/25/2001 03:12:53 PM
To: "'karen.denne@enron.com'" <karen.denne@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Roundtable Participants

Karen
Attached is list of confirmed participants from the White House for the
meeting in LA on Tuesday.

 (See attached file: Energy Roundtable Participant List.xls)
>  <<Excel 2.x Chart>>

 - Energy Roundtable Participant List.xls


The speaker presentations are now available at the Enron Law Conference
website at http://lawconference.corp.enron.com/. These materials can be found
under Presentation Handouts or the Conference Schedule. Click the icon to the
left of the presentation which will launch the application. Once the file is
visible, you can navigate to the various slides using the Page Up and Page
Down keys or print the file. To return to the Handouts Menu use the back
arrow. If you are not able to access the website from your location, please
contact me and the files can be sent via e-mail. These materials will be
available on the website until next year's conference. The CLE Committee
hopes you enjoyed your first "Binder Free" conference!

Paulette Obrecht
Legal Project Coordinator
713-646-6305


Good morning, Ben!? Just wanted to say  HI!? Hope you had a great week-end!
Love ya,  CyberMom


Diane, not a high priority, but would you please get with Kim Melodick and find out what the client group wants to do with the Alonzo Williams lawsuit?  He never answered, and currently is in default.  Thanks.  Michelle

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/11/01 12:28 AM -----

	"Bill W. Ogden" <bogden@ogwb.com> 12/14/00 03:27 PM Please respond to bogden 	   To: "Michelle Cash" <michelle.cash@enron.com>  cc: "Mark Haedicke" <mark.e.haedicke@enron.com>  Subject: Alonzo Williams

Michelle:
	By my calculation Alonzo Williams' answer date will be Dec. 26. He was
served on November 29. I haven't heard anything.
	It occurred to me that we often are successful in resolving these things
quickly and cheaply by having someone at Enron call a contact at the new
company, TXU, and bring the issue to a head. So far as I know no one has
made such a call in this case.  I recall from the Union litigation a few
years ago there was an Enron exec who went to TUFCO by the name of Mark
McNally. We deposed Mark in that case and he was very professional and
cooperative. McNally had been at Enron and (I believe) Houston Pipeline for
15-17 years. He's now been with TXU 4 or 5 years and is CFO. A call to him
might get this off dead center. I'm copying Mark on this email because I
know Mark knows McNally well.
	What do you think?
	Best regards,
	Bill


Frank,

Did you receive the information about the San Marcos apartments.  I have left
several messages at your office to follow up.  You mentioned that your plate
was fairly full.  Are you too busy to look at this project?  As I mentioned I
would be interested in speaking to you as an advisor or at least a sounding
board for the key issues.

Please email or call.

Phillip Allen
pallen@enron.com
713-853-7041


When you see Gas Deals that are between two parties other than Enron, throw
them away.  Joe has said that we do not need to call them to let them know,
just toss them.

Brenna


Cecilia

Great victory! No playing around with caps on MAE prices. We have to make
sure this is sustainable (and people will actually pay for their exposures)

LM

Cecilia Mercio   06/01/2001 05:12 PM

To: Sergio Assad/SA/Enron@Enron, Luiz Maurer/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MAE's Price June 2001

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Cecilia Mercio/SA/Enron on 06/01/2001
05:17 PM ---------------------------
Cecilia Mercio   06/01/2001 05:09 PM

To: Joe Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, Remi
Collonges/SA/Enron@Enron, David M Rosenberg/SA/Enron@Enron, Brett R
Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Joao Carlos Albuquerque/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo
Sassatani/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Lisboa/SA/Enron@Enron, Guy
Ishikawa/SA/Enron@Enron, Breno Nogueira/SA/Enron@Enron, Julian
Poole/SA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Hansen/SA/Enron@Enron, Rodolfo
Freyre/SA/Enron@Enron, Jorge Gumucio/SA/Enron@Enron, Luis
Henriques/SA/Enron@Enron, Moacyr Carmo/SA/Enron@Enron, Luis
Berti/SA/Enron@Enron, Eduardo Cancian/SA/Enron@Enron, Roberto
Schloesser/SA/Enron@Enron, Marcelo Parodi/SA/Enron@Enron, Idel
Metzger/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Mucci/SA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo D
Cunha/SA/Enron@Enron, Luiz Baccaro/SA/Enron@Enron, Murilo
Hyai/SA/Enron@Enron, Andre Salomao/SA/Enron@Enron, Paulo
Squariz/SA/Enron@Enron, Federico Cerisoli/SA/Enron@Enron, Erwin
Landivar/SA/Enron@Enron, Mateus Andrade/SA/Enron@Enron, Joca
Paciello/SA/Enron@Enron, Flavio Silberberg/SA/Enron@Enron, Roberto
Hukai/SA/Enron@Enron, Fred Sampaio/SA/Enron@Enron, Guillermo
Atenor/SA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MAE's Price June 2001

It was published in ASMAE website (www.asmae.com.br).


In our previous dealings, the counterparty never responded to the proposed
EEI Master Energy Purchase and Sale Agreements.  Concepts like margining were
not understood and there was even a case whereby we tried to margin them and
they failed to post.  Jim Delany at ENE has tried to reignite the EEI
discussions, but I'm not very interested until I get their comments to our
original EEI.  Let me know if I can be of assistance.

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 02/12/2001 10:21 AM
To: Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Energy New England LLC ("ENE")

Ed & Brant:

I'm being hounded by ENE but no Enron traders seem interested.  Brant
prepared a new worksheet based upon which we sent a new ISDA.  ENE
"represents" four municipal utilities and is trying to negotiate ISDA's on
behalf of those utilities.  I think the agent is off-base and I'm not sure
that any of the utilities really want to trade financial.

Ed, Shari suggested that you may have some insight into ENE.  Should I drop
this one altogether?  Or are we interested in pursuing?

Either Ed or Brant please let me know.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Em,

I cannot believe you ran into Ben Affleck!!!  I'm sure it's just the first of
many celebrity sightings you will have in Jolly Old England.  I had an
absolutely incredible time in San Diego with Julie.  We went to the beach
(where I was able to lay-out and not sweat!), shopped a ton, attended the
symphony and got messages.  All in all it was an extremely relaxing weekend.
Yesterday, I was in Austin for a recruiting trip and got to see Corey's new
house in Hyde Park - very cute.

So I got back to work today, Wednesday, and still no word from Mr. Noble.
Just to refresh, the last time I heard from him (email) was Thursday
morning.  You'd be proud of me though as I have refrained from any form of
contact and plan to continue that route only deviating if/when it becomes
necessary for me to have a formal close to things.  I'm still hoping that
will not be the case but am fully prepared for the possibility that my brief
encounter with dating may be over for a while.

Sue


Enron opens an office in Japan.  Get the details in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
FERC suggests overhaul for California
ENA's focus on upstream services
Cyber Cafe in Dabhol

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz November 3, 2000."


Weather Trading
Energy and weather are so inextricably tied to one another that it is sometimes hard to separate the two. The demand for power is directly related to temperature going up in summer and going down in winter. If, therefore, you have an unusually cool summer, the demand for power will be much lesser than anticipated, and the same in case of an unusually warm winter. Several electricity utilities enter into power purchase agreements based on anticipated demand, and would face serious financial losses in such cases.
Weather derivatives provide such companies an option to hedge against risk of weather fluctuations. It is no surprise, then, that one of the conferences more lively discussions centered on the presentation by Tom Fletcher, head of weather trading for Mirant <http://www.mirant.com/>.
In describing weather trading, Fletcher reported the market has grown exponentially since it was first formed in 1997. Fletcher highlighted how successful trading requires purchasing the right product. He went on to describe some of the sophisticated products being launched and how Mirant is integrating weather risk into their overall profile and what that means for the traders on the floor.
With presentations from other market leaders such as Centrica, I-Wex, Spectron, Aquila, LIFFE, Mirant, Bewag, Aon and Entergy-Koch, Weather Trading Europe <http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weather/> provided three days of the latest developments in European trading.
The conference touched on key issues surrounding the sector including liquidity in the weather market-where is it and how to access it; data issues-the state of play in European weather data and how you can best utilize the information you've got and a host of other topics designed to help attendees leverage their skills.
As weather trading takes its place in the online world, there is a pressing need to develop greater use of weather derivatives from corporations to avoid the market becoming a predominantly speculative industry.

Michelle Lokay
Account Director
Transwestern Commercial Group
713-345-7932


Hi Mark,

Thanks for your response.  Sorry, I didn't provide you my number here in
Tokyo.  For future reference, my office number is 81-3 5219-4578.  I'll try
to give you a ring Wednesday morning (Houston time) to discuss the going
forward strategy.

 Attached hereto, are the draft documents, modified in accordance with your
comments/questions and my responsive comments (which are set forth below in
red).

Look forward to seeing you soon.

Hi Susan-

Please review the attached documents from the tax perspective.  Thanks.

Best regards,

John

	Mark Taylor@ECT
	08/22/2000 06:59 PM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Japanese ISDA Documents

Dear John:

So sorry for the delay.  I hope it hasn't caused too much inconvenience. No
problem!  I would have called to apologize in person but believe it or not I
don't have your phone number!   Here are my comments to the draft documents
you sent:

Part 1 (b)  In our other derivatives trading, the cross default test applies
to Enron Corp. with a Threshold of US$100,000,000.  To accomplish this in the
schedule, Threshold Amount for the Enron party would apply to our Credit
Support Provider if there is going to be an Enron Corp. guaranty and the
dollar figure adjusted accordingly.  The Schedule has been revised.  Please
advise if the equivalent change should be made to paragraph (b)(iv)(B) of
paragraph 13 of the CSA.

Part 1 (d)  Has Baker & McKenzie recommended this?  We rely on local counsel
advice for this provision but our preference is that the termination in a
bankruptcy context not be automatic unless it needs to be.  The risk in the
automatic situation is that the market moves significantly before we are even
aware of the situation, i.e. the outstanding transactions terminate
automatically, leaving us with an open, unhedged position which we are not
able to protect since we are not aware of it.  In the U.S. the bankruptcy
code allows us to terminate after the filing of a bankruptcy according to the
terms of the agreement so we know exactly the time to rehedge.   According to
B&M, the ability to set-off against Japanese counterparties is limited by
certain laws relating to insolvency including the Bankruptcy Law.  These laws
give a trustee the right to cherry pick contracts.  Accordingly, it is the
general practice in Japan for parties to elect automatic early termination to
ensure that close out netting takes place before the trustee's right to
cherry pick comes into effect.  In December 1998, a netting law came into
effect in Japan which specifically permits close out netting (notwithstanding
the trustee's right to cherry pick).  The netting law only applies where one
of the parties to the transaction is a financial institution (Mitsui Marine
and Fire, Sanwa and IBJ, would all qualify).  From a legal perspective, it is
now arguable that automatic early termination should not be adopted (for the
same reasons as are described in you message).  However, as a matter of
Japanese market practice, B&M has advised that most schedules with Japanese
counterparties still specify automatic early termination.  Accordingly, the
automatic early termination provision in place.  Please confirm that this is
acceptable.  Please also note, that the automatic early termination provision
will be necessary when Enron Japan deals with Japanese corporations that are
not financial institutions.

Part 1 (e)  We usually choose Loss here as the method which gives the
non-defaulting party the most flexibility.  Market Quotation is often
suggested because of its apparent objective nature.  However, in many of the
markets where we operate, quotations will not be available, where they are
available they may well not be meaningful, and the Loss method gives
flexibility (while still requiring commercial reasonableness).  The Schedule
has been revised.

Part 1 (h)(ix)  This Additional Event of Default only applies when there is
no collateral annex.   When we have the ability to ask for (or be asked for)
collateral in the case of a downgrading, we build that event into the
Paragraph 13 to trigger a reduction of the threshold to zero which requires
the posting of collateral to cover any open position.  If the party fails, it
then becomes a default allowing termination.  The Schedule has been revised.

Part 1 (h)(x)  Wouldn't the cross default be triggered before this could
happen?  B&M has advised that although the cross default provisions may well
be triggered before this clause applies, the clause is standard in Japan and
is not detrimental to Enron, therefore the clause has been left in place.

Part 2  Have our internal Tax people approved this?  I have copied Susan
Musch on this e-mail, so that she may review the documents for tax purposes.

Part 3  I am not familiar with the Representative Director concept or some of
the corporate documents referred to.  Since Enron Corp. will be a Credit
Support Provider, does it have a Representative Director, etc.?  The clause
has been modified to allow different documents to be specified in connection
with the Enron Corp. guarantee.  Please fill in the blanks to specify the
appropriate documents.  Sorry for the oversight.

The legal opinion requirement is one that we can waive if local counsel does
not think it necessary.  In many non-US jurisdictions, local counsel have
advised that an opinion be obtained - in some cases derivatives transactions
are so uncommon that they might be outside the ordinary course of business
and therefore require special board approval; in others, derivatives would
not be permissible activities for a company unless express provision is made
in the corporate documents, etc.  B&M has stated that in practice they have
never been given or asked to review a Japanese law opinion in relation to a
specific ISDA schedule entered into by a Japanese counterparty and would
expect Japanese counterparties to be reluctant to provide such opinions.

Part 5 (b) (g)&(h) These representations originate with CFTC rules in mind
(although they may be helpful for other reasons as well).  If neither party
is in the US, the CFTC reason may go away.  On the other hand, since we are
choosing New York law to apply the argument might be made that US federal law
applies as well.  If that is our theory, there are additional representations
(the Eligible Swap Participant reps) that we should think about putting back
in.   These representations were tailored with the Japanese prohibition on
gambling in mind. I was not able to find the "eligible swap participant"
representation in the Enron US ISDA Form (although there is a reference to
this in the opinion).  Please inform me as to the wording that needs to be
added for New York purposes.

Part 5 (d)  We are currently evaluating whether we should revise this section
to make reference to the ISDA 2000 definitions.  While I think we will get
there, we haven't actually made the decision yet.  So far I guess we leave it
the way it is.  OK

Part 5 (j)  My only concern here is with the value of the Enron Corp.
guaranty as a form for a guaranty from a Japanese entity.  Any differences in
Japan from US practice we should be worried about?  For the swap
counterparties currently being considered by Enron (Mitsui Marine, IBJ and
Sanwa) no guarantees are being required.  B&M has advised, the form of the
Enron Corp. guarantee would generally be acceptable for guaranteeing the
obligations of Japanese counterparties.  However, there are a number of
changes that may be considered including switching the governing law and
jurisdiction provisions to Japan for ease of enforcement against parties
whose principal assets are located in Japan.  It is recommended that the
guarantee be reviewed in further detail before it is actually proposed to
counterparties.

Paragraph 13  I have to admit I'm not as familiar with the Paragraph 13
provisions as the Schedule.  My only concern here is with the MAC clause and
it looks like there's a glitch in the form.  It seems to me that if the
counterparty is only rated by one of the 2 major agencies we shouldn't be
pegged with a MAC if only one of our agencies stops rating us.  The way it is
drafted now if either S&P or Moody's stops rating us, even if the remaining
rating is very high we will have a MAC occur.  The counterparty doesn't have
to worry about Moody's at all.  Just a thought.  The suggested change has
been made.  Additionally, the provision has been modified to provide that a
MAC will occur with respect to Enron, only if both rating agencies downgrade
Enron Corp.  Please confirm this is OK.

On the guaranty, you will need to run the choice of law and jurisdiction
changes past Clement Abrams at Corp. Legal.  My only comment is that we would
usually have a cap that is a bit higher (in this case maybe an extra
$5,000,000) than the threshold in the CSA - that gives the counterparty a
little wiggle room if we fail to post collateral after the threshold is
exceeded.  I will separately forward the guaranty to Clement Abrams for his
approval. The cap has been increased to US$20,000,000.

Tana is preparing a red-line for me that hopefully will show all of the
changes between the US form and the Japan form.  I may have a few more
comments after I see how that comes out but don't expect many.  I apologize
that the red-line was not fully made against the US form.

I hope this is helpful.  Mark-  This has been very helpful! Please feel free
to call and we can walk through these over the phone if that would be
useful.  We should also talk about the most efficient way to prepare these
going forward.  It might make sense for Credit to send their worksheets to
the paralegals here for a first draft which would then go to you for review
before going to the counterparty.  It may slow things down by a day or two
but it would free you up to work on other things.  All excellent ideas.

We're looking forward to having you back.  Looking forward to seeing you
soon.  Thanks again.


Thanks to the great work of Cara and Diana, all BPA Surplus Firm purchases
for the month of May have been booked out with BPA or delivered to a muni.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT on 04/23/2001 04:13
PM ---------------------------

Diana Scholtes
04/23/2001 02:53 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve C
Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: BPA Surplus Frim

All of May's Surplus Firm obligations has been booked out or has been
delivered to a PUD for the month of May.

Diana


Hi Vince- Please examine. I think it's going to happen and you have
confirmation below- need sleep it's 3:30 PST- I'll need 7 hours sleep and
then I'll be up...add 2 more for time difference and I'll be available for
you, at your service (your time around (1:30 afternoon).
I called Rachel @ Enron London- she said it is set up too. I am confident.
Thank you for the opportunity.
Jeff Wesley 949 813 2241
********************************************************
Hi Howard,
 > Please find following confirmation as promised.
 >
 >
 > Date of Interview: Tuesday 30 January 2001
 >
 > Time of Interview: 2.30pm
 >
 > Interviewers: 2.30pm Nigel Price -CreditTrading
 > 3.00pm Ben Parsons - Research & Trading
 > Controls - Senior Specialist
 > 3.30pm Vasant Shanbhogue Research
 > Group Houston
 >
 >
 > Address: 40 Grosvenor Place
 > London
 > SW1X 7EN
 >
 > Switchboard: 020 7783-0000
 >
 > Closest Tube/Train Station: Victoria
 >
 >
 > Location Map attached
 > (See attached file: Location Map.pdf)
 > <>
 > Manager
 > Robert Walters
 > Manager
 > Risk & Quantitative Analysis

*  Get free, secure online email at http://www.ziplip.com/  *


---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001 05:16 AM
---------------------------

Rob G Gay
02/12/2001 09:48 AM
To: boeh@opic.gov, "Kluesener, Frank" <frank.kluesener@kfw.de>, "Rivera,
Nancy A." <NRIVE@opic.gov>
cc:

Subject: GSA

On Friday we distributed  RFPs for securing bridge gas.   Letters went today
to Chaco, TotalfinaElf, Andina, Maxus, BritishGas and Petrobras for them to
quote us 6-month gas with our option to extend for another 6 months.  We have
given them until March 2nd to respond.

Pete Weidler will meet with YPF (hopefully with Ernesto Lopez Anad?n) the
week of the 19th.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Pereira, Susan W.
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:44 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	FW: Highlights from ENE Analyst Conference Call 11/14

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tucker, Patrick
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Pollan, Sylvia S.; Culotta, Lindsay; Murrell, Russell E; Plachy, Denver; Cuilla, Martin; Storey, Geoff; Yawapongsiri, Virawan; Mahmassani, Souad; Donohoe, Tom; Ruscitti, Kevin; Shively, Hunter S.; Lewis, Andrew H.; Giron, Darron C.; Frihart, Bryant; Roberts, Linda; Luce, Laura; Hogan, Irena D.; Vickers, Frank; Williams, Jason (Trading); Mims, Patrice L.; Simpson, James; Hodge, John; Keavey, Peter F.; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Pereira, Susan W.; Pimenov, Vladi; Ring, Andrea; Savvas, Leonidas; Townsend, Judy; Versen, Victoria; Barbe, Robin; Concannon, Ruth; Goodell, Scott; Jones, David; Kaiser, Jared; Loving, Scott; Bates, Kimberly; Muhl, Gil; Smith, Maureen; Smith, Shauywn; Taylor, Craig; Willis, Jim; Tucker, Patrick; McCaffrey, Deirdre; Penman, Gregg; Kinsey, Lisa; Brady, Kevin; Pendergrass, Cora
Subject:	Highlights from ENE Analyst Conference Call 11/14

Here are my notes from today's call.  As with Monday, I've focused on getting them out as quickly as possible rather than taking extra time to re-organize them by subject.

Enron's business has been grouped into three buckets:  Core, Non-core, and Under Review.
Core:  Wholesale energy business in North America and Europe, retail energy, pipelines
Non-core:  Broadband, water, and international assets (i.e. EGAS).  Enron has approx. $8Bn in investments in these assets, and they have produced 'dismal' returns.  Enron will be exiting these businesses and will attempt to wind them up in an orderly fashion.  An aggressive divestiture program has been set in motion for these assets.
Under Review:  EGM, EIM.  These businesses are being closely examined to determine whether they have a reasonable chance of long-term viability.  Required resource levels are being carefully studied.  Following review, Enron will move the different portions of these businesses to core or non-core as the analysis dictates.
Approximately $800MM of asset sales are under contract and expected to close in the fourth quarter.  These include a gas LDC in Brazil, EcoElectrica, and our Indian E&P assets.
Enron is in active pursuit of an additional private equity infusion of $500MM-1Bn.  Given the current environment, raising equity in the public markets would be 'inefficient', McMahon says.
Short-term liquidity is provided by the $3Bn of credit drawn upon a few weeks ago, the $1Bn of new debt, and the $1.5Bn equity infusion from Dynegy.  Longer-term, the proceeds from the sale of PGE will provide liquidity.  Asset sales over the next year will be used to pay down debt.
McMahon described the major off-balance-sheet vehicles:
Marlin was set up to hold Azurix assets.  It was initially capitalized with $950MM of 144a debt and $125MM of equity (raised from Enron and institutional investors).  The debt is supported by the equity and by Azurix' assets.  Enron is obligated to cover any deficit at the time the debt becomes due on 3/17/03 (the 'Enron topup' obligation).  The 3/17/03 date is accelerated in the event that Enron is rated below-investment-grade by any one of the three major agencies.  The primary asset of Marlin is Wessex Water.  As long as Wessex is worth at least $2.6Bn, there will be no Enron topup required.  If we take a 25% haircut to present book value, Enron will have to provide $650MM in consideration upon retirement of the debt.  This $650MM would hit Enron cash, income, and equity balances.
Osprey contains energy-related assets and 'other assets'.  It was initially capitalized with $2.4Bn of 144a debt and $220MM in equity (ENE and institutionals).  As with Marlin, the entity is an asset-backed structure with an Enron topup guarantee. The debt is supported by a) the assets; b) $1Bn of convertible preferred ENE (convertible into 50MM shares of ENE common); and c) additional ENE common as needed for topup.  Assuming the same 25% hypothetical haircut to current book value, Enron would have to deliver approx. $600MM of topup funds--which would hit ENE cash, income, and equity.  The debt must be retired by 9/17/02, with the same cut-to-junk early trigger provision as Marlin.
Yosemite and the Credit-Linked Notes are predominantly commodity transactions entered into with 'large financial institutions'.  The underlying transactions are already on Enron's balance sheet.  McMahon says that there is no Enron share obligation related to these instruments.
Dynegy has reviewed all of these vehicles, McMahon says.
Our 10Q will be filed five days late.  The 10Q will include all of this detail regarding the off-balance-sheet vehicles.
The special committee investigation is still ongoing.  The committee meets 2-3 times/week, sometimes more often.  The outside auditors (D&T) and external counsel hired by the committee are working 'virtually 7 days a week'.  Lay estimates that it will take the committee several more weeks to complete its investigation.
McMahon says it's 'way too early to tell' if any asset writedowns are called for.  That analysis is underway, but it will not be complete for some time.
Osprey contains the European power projects (Trakya and Saarlux), some North American merchant investments, and some Brazilian assets.
Under the merger agreement, Enron cannot dispose of assets representing more than 15% of the balance sheet without Dynegy approval.  However, an appendix to the agreement holds a list of assets that are specifically permitted to be sold without Dynegy approval.
Broadband is expected to be fully wound up 'sometime over the course of the next year'.  (Did not catch this part clearly).
The ENE topup obligation for Marlin (represented by ENE common that would have to be delivered) will be converted into an obligation for an equivalent amount of DYN shares upon closing.
$1.9Bn of debt is carried at the Azurix level.
Current book value of the Osprey assets is $2.1Bn.
No Dynegy outs other than the previously discussed general MAC clause and the $3.5Bn legal liability clause.
Yosemite and the Credit-Linked notes are functionally equivalent to ENE senior unsecured debt (this section somewhat unclear).  The underlying transactions represented volumes of 'crude oil and gas'.  The transactions relate to the 'physical movement' of these commodities.  The swaps related to Yosemite and the CLNs would be financially settled.
Whalley was asked about the return of trading business to normal volumes.  He said that he cannot yet give an update on the progress of customers returning to our longer-term products.  Acknowledges that a few anxious customers put long-term deals on hold last week.  Says that our first focus is on getting our short-term business back up to normal levels.  It will be 'a couple of weeks' before we're able to give an update on the comfort levels of our customers regarding long-term deals with us.
McMahon:  There hasn't been a major relaxation of credit requirements by our customers--credit requirements continue to follow strict contractual provisions as called for in our individual agreements with our various customers.  But 'we have seen a return of some of the transactions, some of the flows.'
Whalley says that we're hoping to see a return to more normal trading levels late this week or early next week.
Lay says that cost cuts will be made across of all of our businesses.  The situation gives us an opportunity to review our entire cost structure, he says.  The cuts will certainly be deeper in our non-core businesses.  Whalley then quickly interjects (some might say interrrupts) with a clarification that there are no plans to reduce the size of our North American energy trading business.  We will be looking at, perhaps, streamlining some of our processes and making prudent adjustments, but there are no plans to reduce the size of the business.
McMahon:  "The company is overlevered; that's a fact."--hence our pursuit of additional equity.
McMahon mentions that business was better at the start of this week than at the end of last week.
ENE had approx. $1Bn in cash as of 9/30, which McMahon points out would be unusual for us.

As before, give me a call at 3-3055 if you'd like more color.

Patrick Tucker


Jim, this sounds like an ambush..... :)
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/03/2000
09:00 AM ---------------------------
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 10/03/2000 06:16 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Presentation at Alstom ESCA Meeting in Las Vegas

Dave --

I am trying to obtain an attendance list as well as confirm the other
speakers on the panel.  The initial list of speakers included the Governor of
California and the Governor of Pennsylvania, although I am not sure if they
are coming.  If ESCA gets Davis and Ridge, I think that we would have a good
opportunity for you.

Once I have more information I'll be in contact.

Jim

	David W Delainey@ECT
	10/02/2000 12:53 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Presentation at Alstom ESCA Meeting in Las Vegas

Jim, I am not sure that this will attract the people we want to hear the
message; however, I will hold back judgement until we discuss the strategy in
more detail.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000
12:52 PM ---------------------------
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 09/30/2000 12:04 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Presentation at Alstom ESCA Meeting in Las Vegas

Dave --

Alstom ESCA is holding "Summit 2000" in Las Vegas Oct 16 - Oct 17.  The
purpose of the meeting is to bring together people from throughout the
industry to discuss key issues.

Alstom ESCA is a French company that builds EMS systems in the US.  They
developed the EMS for Enron's control areas.  We are working with them on
Project e-trans (the RTO software).

The first panel in the am on Monday involves Re-regulation and Competition.
They would like someone from Enron to present and participate.  Right now,
they have  Pacificorp and are trying to get someone from government in PA and
CA.  The presentation / speech is 10 - 15 minutes followed by 30 minutes of
Q&A for the panel.

Do you have any interest in presenting?  This could be a good opportunity to
deliver our message throughout the industry.

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Jim


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 06:31 AM ---------------------------

"Cathy Lopez" <cathy@pira.com> on 04/30/2001 05:16:36 PM
To:	"PIRA Natural Gas Retainer Client" <greg@pira.com>
cc:
Subject:	PIRA's Special Release Gas Flash: Strong Supply Growth Indicated 04/30/01

Attached is a PIRA Special Release entitled "Gas Flash: Strong Supply Growth
Indicated."

If you have any questions regarding the report's content, please contact:
Greg Shuttlesworth (email: greg@pira.com), Tom Howard (email:
tazh@pira.com), Richard Redash (email: Rich@pira.com), Nobu Tarui (email:
nobuo@pira.com) or Jane Hsu (email: jane@pira.com), at (212) 686-6808.

Contact John Graziano regarding PIRA report distribution and address changes
at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com.

NOTE: Circulation of the "Gas Flash Weekly" outside a Client's licensed
distribution area is strictly prohibited. Clients that are unsure of their
licensed distribution or require an extension of their current license
should contact their PIRA sales representative, or email to sales@pira.com.

PIRA Energy Group

 - agaspec043001.pdf


A quick message in case you hadn't heard.  Thursday afternoon and Friday
morning, legal can be reached at the Woodlands Conference Center at:

281-297-5130 (phone)

281-297-5132 and 5133 (fax)


Can I call you with a banana?


I spoke to Barry Margolis this afternoon and he  confirmed Stacey's planned
departure from Baker Botts.? Barry has spoken to  Stacy over the past week
about it.??Stacey will be going to Goldman  Sachs October 1 to develop tax
products.
?
Barry would like to set-up a metting with you to  discuss this.? He doesn't
think that anyone at Baker Botts has the depth  that Stacy has.? He is also
concerned about certain issues that may need to  be dealt with at year-end.?
Therefore, it sounds like we need to find a  qualified replacement.


Thank you to Nancy and Joe for pointing out a typo in the document I just
sent.  With a very red face (!), I am sending the corrected version.
My apologies for the confusion.

Jennifer

----- Forwarded by Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron on 05/31/2001 04:06 PM -----

	Jennifer Thome
	05/31/2001 01:29 PM

		 To: Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: Talking points on natural gas in CA

Nancy:  Yesterday we made a very slight change in language used (1st page,
2nd bulletpoint).  I have attached the document reflecting this change.
Given feedback from Jim on Friday, and Leslie today, the document is ready
for use.

Let me know if there are questions.

Thanks, Jennifer

	Nancy Bagot
	05/31/2001 01:10 PM

		 To: Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Talking points on natural gas in CA

Jennifer, I just want to verify that this last version I have is the most
recent and we can use it to 'shop around'.

Thanks,
Nancy

	Jennifer Thome
	05/25/2001 04:54 PM

		 To: Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Talking points on natural gas in CA

Nancy:

Per Linda's request, attached are the talking points on natural gas in CA.
Note that we will continue updating these points are new data becomes
available.

Please contact me with any questions.

Have a nice weekend.

Jennifer
713.345.3550