FYI>>>>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:13 PM
To:	Concannon, Ruth; Townsend, Judy; Lamadrid, Victor; Muhl, Gil; Tate, Paul; Superty, Robert; Calcagno, Suzanne; McMichael Jr., Ed; Smith, George F.; Gomez, Julie A.
Subject:	Gulf South Proposes 1 Bcf/d Interstate Line to Carolinas

FYI, in case you haven't heard about this?????.
(Talk about environmental problems!!!!  700 miles of 36-inch pipe??)
NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : August 20, 2001
Gulf South Proposes 1 Bcf/d Interstate Line to Carolinas
Gulf South Pipeline Co. LP, formerly Koch Gateway Pipeline, has begun an open season for 1 Bcf/d of new capacity on its Gulf Pines Pipeline project that would provide interstate transportation service to parts of the North and South Carolina markets that currently aren't being served by competitors.
This proposed interstate line, which would serve both traditional load and the expanding power generation markets, would extend further east into the Carolinas than any existing interstate pipeline, tapping into virgin territory, said Gulf South spokesman Marc Palazzo, It "would bring interstate pipeline [service]...to a region that historically has not had that service" before, he noted.
The open season began Friday and will close on Sept. 19 for capacity on the proposed 600-700 mile, 36-inch diameter or greater pipeline, which would originate near Mobile Bay, AL, and extend in an southeasterly direction through Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina.
The actual route of the proposed pipeline would not be determined until after the open season, Palazzo noted. Gulf South said it would accept both binding and non-binding nominations during the open season.
Given the growth in population, "we expect that the demand for natural gas in the southeastern portion of the United States will increase significantly during the next decade. We look forward to providing a competitive alternative to the growing power generation, commercial and residential markets in the region in the future," said Gulf South President Rolf Gafvert.
The Gulf Pines project would interconnect with Gulf South near Mobile Bay, enabling customers to access not only Mobile Bay supplies, but also gas supplies from Texas and Louisiana, including Venice and the Henry Hub, according to Gulf South, a subsidiary of Entergy-Koch L.P. The proposed pipeline also would have access to multiple third-party storage facilities, such as Gulf South's facility in Bistineau.
The Gulf Pines pipeline project has been targeted for in service in the summer of 2004. Palazzo said a project application would be filed at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission within a year.
The Gulf South existing system is comprised of 8,800 miles of pipeline, making it the largest interstate gas system in the Gulf Coast region. It runs from Texas through the Gulf Coast states and into the Florida market.
For more information on the Gulf Pines Pipeline project, contact John Boone, senior vice president of marketing, at (713) 544-4315, Rich Cain, vice president of marketing, at (713) 544-5067, or visit the project web site at www.gulfpinespipeline.com. <http://www.gulfpinespipeline.com.>


We agree

"Eileen Ponton" <kponton@duke-energy.com> on 04/17/2001 11:00:35 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU, HPL.SCHEDULING@ENRON.COM, LIZ.BELLAMY@ENRON.COM
cc:
Subject:  NOM / ACTUAL VOLUME FOR APRIL 16TH

NOM       MCF       MMBTU
30,000         29,974         30,784

BTU = 1.027


Yes, Love to have dinner, either the 17th or 18th--you pick.  Let's have a
drink at my house first so I can show you the digs.  Sorry I couldn't make
it...last minute schedule problems...

Jeff

geresj@tdusa.com on 12/12/2000 04:02:50 PM
To: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject: December 17 - 20

Jeff -

Jean and the boys will be heading to my parents for X-Mas on 12/17.  I am in
Houston until the morning of the 21st, and would love to get together for
dinner
sometime during that interval.

Are you scheduled to be in town during that period?  If so give me a call at
713.653.8207 (day) or at home at 713.522.9381.  I'll also be happy fill you in
on what happened at the MFAH subcomittee meeting today as well.

JRG


See attched, revised for Fixed Amounts payable in USD.


I will email you with the insurance info tomorrow.


Ben and Kay, given that 2 of the LOCs are for the Intergen deal, once the
sale occurs on the 18th of January you will need to have the LOCs
reissued/assigned to CA Development I and II.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Clark, Catherine
Sent: Thursday, January  11, 2001 7:24 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Tweed, Sheila; Mann, Kay
Cc: Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
Subject: Letter of Credit from GE for LM6000s

The accounting group received a set of 3 faxes from GE with information on
Letters of Credit issued by GE with E-Next Generation as the beneficiary.
These documents need to be countersigned and I don't know if anything else is
required to "activate" the LOCs.  I'll fax copies to you all.
The documents are:
LOC 1: $4,289,200  (for the 6 Fountain Valley turbines, since the amount is
5% of the total turbine cost)
LOC 2: $717,600  (for Intergen turbine 1)
LOC 3: $717,600 (for Intergen turbine 2)

This is in accordance with the LM6000 purchase agreement (Section 6.1.3)
where GE must provide Retention Letters of Credit (the Retention Amount is 5%
of the purchase price) when E-Next Generation pays GE the final progress
payment (this final payment is scheduled to go out on 1/16/01).

The LOC docs need to be counter-signed within 30 days and then forwarded to
the E-Next Generation, since they are the beneficiary.

-Catherine
x3-9943


The attached schedule is for Wednsday, June 19.  Associated text files have been posted to Sparky.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager, Load Forecasting
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL--THIS ACCOUNT IS NOT MONITORED

AP User:

Attached is/are the payment proposal(s) for your business unit.  Please review and forward to your approver(s)/CAO.

Thank you.
SAP AP Team
 - 20020104-DENWW.XLS


TASK ASSIGNMENT

Task Priority:		2
Task Due On:
Task Start Date:


Great - that all sounds about like what I'd expected. Thanks for the
multiple-terminal-server tip. Again, I'm more than happy to help get this
forward obligation report up to speed and producing the kind of data we need
- just let me know.

Thanks,
Kate

Cara Semperger
02/12/2001 03:48 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Desk-to-Desk v. Cross-Portfolio

I just sent Kroum a little missive on our familiarity with the "killed"
feature, as well as why we often zero out deals (Transmission in particular)
in scheduling only. If I have to teach a course on scheduling for him to
understand how to build this report I will do it, but I am not really dying
to do that.

As far as our situation here, If you can properly kill a deal, you should do
that instead of just zeroing the volume. I quite often have great success
having many terminal server sessions open at once, and doing the slow stuff
through a few different channels of TS.  Even as we speak, I am running one
report for 6 different months, 1 in each of the 5 terminal severs, and one
locally.  I learned that trick in our old winframe system, and it has served
me well.

I have torn my hair out over this cross-portfolio vs cross-desk thing.  I
have explained it to both Kroum, Duong Luu, and Will each at least 3 times.
How hard is it to get the concept that anything we sell to ourselves is not a
physical deal?

I would say just keep sending them to me, so we don't all have to pull our
collective hairs out. The deal you reference below is kind of like a life
preserver thing. When the market makes a sudden move, it is sometimes faster
to 'hit' the deal through EOL then pull it on the traders side.  It's not the
best way to go, but better than losing a bunch of money.

c

   Kate Symes                02/12/2001 03:35 PM

To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Desk-to-Desk v. Cross-Portfolio

I'm not quite sure how this exchange began, but it sounds like Kroum is
referring to several different issues here. First of all, our forward
obligation report does not reflect cross-portfolio deals, an application
issue that Will Smith, and it looks like Kroum as well, has been working on
for the past few weeks.

Also, deal 498488 is a forward deal done on EOL between STSW and their own
desk. I haven't seen a trade WITHIN a desk before, but I'm sure anything is
possible. At any rate, this doesn't look like a cross-portfolio deal at all.
Am I missing something?

As for the zeroed out deals, I'm pretty sure everyone here knows how to
properly kill deals in Enpower; however, it takes so long that sometimes we
simply zero out the volume in the interest of time. I've often wondered if
this litters the system and makes it more confusing for other people to do
their jobs - do you know anything about that?

I just thought I'd ask these questions while the subject was being raised.
Please let me know if I can help facilitate these changes or improvements in
any way.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/12/2001 03:18 PM
---------------------------
From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/12/2001 11:02 AM CST
To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: FW: FWDOBL

             Cara,

      I think the report should work that way even now.

     I think I found a deal like that 498488 between EPMI Southwest and EPMI
Southeast,
     Region R7, please take a look at that when you test the report.

       I saw lots of deals on the report with volume 0 and price 0, they were
entered that way
       in Portland. There might be another reason, but I think someone wanted
to kill the deals.
       There is an option in Deal Entry to do that, if one opens a deal and
right click with the
       mouse on the status (Done), one can kill a deal.

           Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Semperger, Cara
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 1:06 PM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Lande, Monica; Symes, Kate
Subject: Re: FW: FWDOBL

The "two sides of a cross-portfolio deal" language is a bit vague and
misleading. A cross-portfolio deal is kind of like a desk to desk deal.
Another Enron book has traded with one of ours.

Two important things need to happen with cross-portfolio deals.
 1. They need to only show on the forward obligation report when "Desk to
Desk" is selected.
 2. They are only financial in nature, no physical delivery is ever done
cross portfolio.

I don't think "both sides" is correct. We need to only see our buy or our
sale when we query for our point.  When the other portfolio queries their
stuff, they should see their side.

C

From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/08/2001 11:36 AM CST
To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: FWDOBL

        Cara,

     This is all I have so far. I would appreciate your help to make it
clearer.

     If you find a deal No like that, I think it will make my job easier.

     Thanks,
     Kroum

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Project Manager<Unknown.Man@enron.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Project+20Manager+3CUnknown+2EMan+40enron+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@
ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Subject: FWDOBL

Forward Obs should show two sides of a Cross-Portfolio deal.  Find out what
needs to be done.  Contact Monica
Lande or Kate Symes in Portland for more details


Mark:
What do you know about the apparent decision to attach GTCs when faxing out
the confirms?  I believe it was the gas/power people who made that statement
at our October mtg (you were out of town, as I recall).
---------------------- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 17.11.99 12:08
---------------------------

Alan Aronowitz
17.11.99 10:06
To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EOL Confirmations

I have not had any discussions with Mark Taylor on the point of attaching
GTCs. I don't know why it has been determined to be appropriate to do the
attachment. Please consult with Mark on this and let me know what you find
out. Thanks.

Alan

	From:  Janice R Moore                           11/11/99 10:40 PM

To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Confirmations

You will recall that we went to a meeting last month w/ the EOL people while
you were out of town.  That meeting revealed that a lot of work still needed
to be done on the confirms.  Of course, there still hasn't been time to
finish the liquids products EOL confirm templates, and I think the priority
got less urgent, since these products will be among the last to be traded by
EOL.  But the quesiton lingers about the need to attach GTCs to each confirm
that's sent out to the EOL counterparty.  It seemed to us that perhaps you
and Mark Taylor and others might have had discussions on that topic ahnd
reached some conclusion.  Rob Cass made a rather cogent appeal that we not
require the attachment (lots of manhours, for one reason, since the computer
will not automatically generate the GTCs or autofax them).  But we never had
a chance to talk about this, so I'm wondering if you could give me your
thoughts.  Thanks.

By the way, it looks like the SK deal closing is on for next week, so I'll be
leaving for Singapore on Monday.
---------------------- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 11/11/99 10:17
PM ---------------------------

Lynn E Shivers
11/09/99 06:33 PM
To: Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony
Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Confirmations

Have you had a chance to review and finalize the templates for any of our EOL
confirmations?

Also, have any decisions been made on "GTC" attachment/no attachment?

Thanks for your help!

Lynn


Justin and Edmund:

I understand that the two of you are the key legal contacts in London on
EnronOnline, and I thought that I should contact you regarding
Clickpaper.com, Enron Net Works' new e-commerce initiative.

Enron is planning to launch next week (with a formal launch in connection
with Enron Corp.'s analyst meeting on July 25) of a website for Enron's
trading of pulp and paper products.  The business model is similar to that of
EnronOnline, but since this website will have a more targeted audience, we
can expect a broader product offering and greater volumes than is currently
traded on EnronOnline.  It is anticipated that the site will ultimately have
global counterparties and will trade physical products at several "hubs"
around the world, although operations will initially be more or less limited
to the U.S. and Canada.

I understand that the London office has done substantially all of the legal
work associated with enabling global counterparties to trade on EnronOnline
(such as adopting appropriate password applications and electronic trading
agreements and addressing legal issues associated with electronic trading of
financial and physical products).  While much of that work will be
transferable to Clickpaper, there may be some unique issues.

I'm not sure if anyone has discussed how to handle the legal work for
Clickpaper as it expands into European markets, but I thought that I should
raise the issue.  I don't expect a huge volume of work immediately -- it will
probably trickle in as the traders expand their operations -- but at some
point it could become a substantial effort.

I would appreciate any thoughts that you have.

Travis McCullough
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street EB 3817
Houston Texas 77002
Phone:  (713) 853-1575
Fax: (713) 646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/01/2001 04:32
PM ---------------------------

"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 02/12/2001 09:04:20 AM
To: "Kent. Shoemaker (E-mail)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com>, "Lee. Johnson
(E-mail)" <lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Pipitone, Paul"
<paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com>

Subject: City of Austin Breakout Agreement

 Pursuant to Kay Mann's instructions, attached please find a
clean copy of the most recent version of the City of Austin Agreement
(the second document below), as well as a blackline showing changes from
the last version circulated on December 14.  The Agreement deletes
references to specific performance guarantees for combined cycle plants.
The Agreement now has the exhibits rolled in. To complete the agreement,
we need to include the date of execution, the addresses and contacts for
Sections 25.1 and 25.3, and Exhibit H-2.
 <<CRO- City of Austin/GE Facility Agreement Versions 3 to 4.DOC>>
<<Gas Turbine Agreement Draft of 12/13/00.DOC>>
 - GE Facility Agreement Versions 3 to 4.DOC
 - 00.DOC


I don't think Marie handled yet.  Please handle and advise Brent that you are
the person working on Argentina.  Also, we can send the latest deal report
which we should discuss briefly (and the new list of addressees).  Thanks.
Sara
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000
10:24 AM ---------------------------

Brent Hendry@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/18/2000 09:10 AM
To: Marie Heard@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: ISDA

Marie;
Could you please email me the most recent form of ISDA Schedule (modified for
Argentina) with Attachments that we could use as a sample document to hand to
prospective counterparts here in Argentina.  We were sent one prior to the
reorganisation and name change.  Thanks.  Please call if you need additional
information.

Brent


Attached is a draft template for the Schedule and Paragraph 13 of a ISDA
Master Agreement to be use by hedge funds.  The document has been reviewed by
Cadwalader and contains a significantly enlarged range of representations and
covenants of both the hedge fund and the investment manager.  I have not
included in this draft the concept of an investment manager letter which was
suggested by Cadwalader and which can be used when the investment manager
does not agree to be a party to the ISDA Master Agreement.   I would
appreciate it if each of you would take a look at the document and provide me
with any comments you have.  I am meeting with David Mitchell of Cadwalader
on Monday of next week.  I also plan to walk through the base document with
Caroline Abramo and the others in New York on Sunday so that they can better
understand why the ISDA for hedge funds is more complex than normal ISDAs.
Finally, I am also attaching a list that I have prepared of the major changes
that have been made to the standard ISDA to create the hedge fund template.
Thanks.

Frank


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Keyex Customer Mtg. Santa Barbara, CA

Date:		4/11/2001
Time:		8:00 AM - 5:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


If you have any questions, please contact Kristin Walsh at (713) 853-9510.

Bridge Loan Financing Bills May Not Meet Their May 8th Deadline Due to Lack of Support
Sources report there will not be a vote regarding the authorization for the bond issuance/bridge loan by the May 8th deadline.   Any possibility for a deal has reportedly fallen apart.  According to sources, both the Republicans and Democratic caucuses are turning against Davis.  The Democratic caucus is reportedly "unwilling to fight" for Davis.  Many legislative Republicans and Democrats reportedly do not trust Davis and express concern that, once the bonds are issued to replenish the General Fund, Davis would "double dip" into the fund.  Clearly there is a lack of good faith between the legislature and the governor.  However, it is believed once Davis discloses the details of the power contracts negotiated, a bond issuance will take place.  Additionally, some generator sources have reported that some of the long-term power contracts (as opposed to those still in development) require that the bond issuance happen by July 1, 2001.  If not, the state may be in breach of contract.  Sources state that if the legislature does not pass the bridge loan legislation by May 8th, having a bond issuance by July 1st will be very difficult.

The Republicans were planning to offer an alternative plan whereby the state would "eat" the $5 billion cost of power spent to date out of the General Fund, thereby decreasing the amount of the bond issuance to approximately $8 billion.  However, the reportedly now are not  going to offer even this concession.  Sources report that the Republicans intend to hold out for full disclosure of the governor's plan for handling the crisis, including the details and terms of all long-term contracts he has negotiated, before they will support the bond issuance to go forward.

Currently there are two bills dealing  with the bridge  loan; AB 8X and AB 31X.  AB 8X authorizes the DWR to sell up to $10 billion in bonds.  This bill passed the Senate in March, but has stalled in the Assembly due to a lack of Republican support.  AB 31X deals with energy conservation programs for community college districts.  However, sources report this bill may be amended to include language relevant to the bond sale by Senator Bowen, currently in AB 8X.  Senator  Bowen's language states that the state should get paid before the utilities from rate payments (which, if passed, would be likely to cause a SoCal  bankruptcy).

According to sources close to the Republicans in  the legislature, Republicans do not believe there should be a bridge loan due to money available in the General Fund.  For instance, Tony  Strickland has stated that only 1/2 of the bonds (or approximately $5 billion)  should be issued.  Other Republicans reportedly do not support issuing any  bonds.  The Republicans intend to bring this up in debate on  Monday.  Additionally, Lehman Brothers reportedly also feels that a  bridge loan is unnecessary and there are some indications that Lehman may  back out of the bridge loan.

Key Points of the Bridge Financing
Initial Loan Amount:	$4.125 B
Lenders:		JP Morgan		$2.5 B
			Lehman Brothers		$1.0 B
			Bear Stearns		$625 M
Tax Exempt Portion:	Of the $4.125 B; $1.6 B is expected to be tax-exempt
Projected Interest Rate:	Taxable Rate		5.77%
			Tax-Exempt Rate		4.77%
Current Projected
Blended IR:		5.38%
Maturity Date:		August 29, 2001
For more details please contact me at (713) 853-9510

Bill SB 6X Passed the Senate Yesterday, but Little Can be Done at This Time
The Senate passed SB 6X yesterday, which authorizes $5  billion to create the California Consumer Power and Conservation  Authority.    The $5 billion authorized under SB 6X is not the  same as the $5 billion that must be authorized by the legislature to pay for  power already purchased, or the additional amount of bonds that must be authorized to pay for purchasing power going forward.  Again, the Republicans are not in support of these authorizations.  Without the details of the long-term power contracts the governor has  negotiated, the Republicans do not know what the final bond amount is that must  be issued and that taxpayers will have to pay to support.   No further action can be taken regarding the implementation of  SB 6X until it is clarified how and when the state and the utilities get paid  for purchasing power.    Also, there is no staff, defined purpose, etc. for  the California Public Power and Conservation Authority.  However, this can  be considered a victory for consumer advocates, who began promoting this idea  earlier in the crisis.

SoCal Edison and Bankruptcy
At this point, two events would be likely to trigger a SoCal bankruptcy.  The first would be a legislative rejection of the MOU between SoCal and the governor.  The specified deadline for legislative approval of the MOU is August 15th, however, some decision will likely be made earlier.  According to sources, the state has yet to sign the MOU with SoCal, though SoCal has signed it.  The Republicans are against the MOU in its current form and Davis and the Senate lack the votes needed to pass.  If the legislature indicates that it will not pas the MOU, SoCal would likely file for voluntary bankruptcy (or its creditor - involuntary) due to the lack operating cash.

The second likely triggering event, which is linked directly to the bond issuance, would be an effort by Senator Bowen to amend SB 31X (bridge loan) stating that the DWR would received 100% of its payments from ratepayers, then the utilities would receive the residual amount.  In other words, the state will get paid before the utilities.  If this language is included and passed by the legislature, it appears likely that SoCal will likely file for bankruptcy.  SoCal is urging the legislature to pay both the utilities and the DWR proportionately from rate payments.


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Natural Gas Delivered on Wednesday, December  12, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Tuesday, December  11, 2001)
Click here to access index history


As you may recall from Drew Fossum's email where he mentioned needing a follow up meeting from your brief discussion in Monday morning's Staff Meeting, the meeting time selected is Thursday, July 12th from 4:00 to 5:00 p.m.

Please let me know if you cannot make it at this time.

Thanks,

Bonnie Baum

send email to:  esellers@enron.com


CES needs

CPA8-39 5000 day
CPA8-38 250 day
CPA8-36 2500 day
CMD4-25 3200 day
CMD8-27 250 day
meter 30AL - Allied 7000 day


Wood say issue of contract renewal put off for further examination?  jeff


I need until Friday to get this done.   This has been the busiest trading week of the year.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Buckley, Karen
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:30 AM
To:	Baughman Jr., Don; Presto, Kevin M.; Lagrasta, Fred
Cc:	Will, Lloyd
Subject:	Oustanding evauation forms

 << File: A&A Evaluation Form.doc >>

Don/Kevin/Fred

I would be grateful if you/your group can finalise the evalation feedback form for the following Trading Track participants.   John L will be reviewing all feedback for the program participants in advance of feedback.

Paul Schiavone:		Presto
Mog Heu		La Grasta
Juan Padron		Baughman

I would be grateful if you could return these today.

Any questions please let me know.

Kind regards,

Karen.
x54667


Keith:
Tomorrow works better for me.  I'm checking with Ed and will get back to you
soon.
Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Keith Ferguson <keith.ferguson@fmc-law.com>
	06/05/2001 04:52 PM

		 To: "'Carol.St.Clair@enron.com'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Status

Carol:
How would the following work for you --  1-1:30 pm your time tomorrow
afternoon or either 8:30 - 9:00 am or  1-1:30 your time on Thursday?  Mike
Roach and I are in different cities, so if you and Ed Sacks are able to be
at the same number, it may be easiest for me to initiate the call.

Regards,
Keith Ferguson
FRASER MILNER CASGRAIN LLP
<http://www.fmc-law.com/>
2900 Manulife Place
10180 - 101 Street
Edmonton, AB  T5J 3V5
(780) 970-5285 Direct Line
(780) 423-7276 Fax
keith.ferguson@fmc-law.com

This message, and any documents attached thereto, is intended only for the
addressee and may contain privileged or confidential information.  Any
unauthorized disclosure is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately so that we may correct our
internal records.  Please then delete the original message.  Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:00 PM
To: keith.ferguson@fmc-law.com
Subject: Status

Keith:
Are we in a position for credit and legal to have a call about the open
issues?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Attached is the Dash Sheet for the Texas Wind PPA.  This is being distributed
now for your review in anticipation of it being distributed for your
signature in the next few days.  If you have any questions please call me at
713-853-4258.

Regards,
Mike Curry


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/13/2000
04:43 PM ---------------------------

Kim.Mayers@mail.sprint.com on 11/13/2000 03:54:20 PM
To: crichter@amfm.com, darron.c.giron@enron.com, jcmayers@earthlink.net,
smmayers@earthlink.net
cc:
Subject: FW: different Florida election Ballot

I thought this was a little humorous!

Kim Mayers
Product Manager
Sprint Broadband Wireless Group
Phone: (913) 315-9132
PCS: (913) 269-8197
Fax: (913) 315-0760
kim.mayers@mail.sprint.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Trainer, Brian
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 3:47 PM
To: berve; Brady, James S.; Broom, Gerald; Broom, Janis; Byrd, Brenda
W.; Byrd, Brian J.; Franz, Kevin J.; Gampper, James J. PCS.; Garris,
Kathy P.; Garris, Lee J.; Gobea, Paul A.; Jamaleddin, Joe N.; Joyce,
Sean R.; Kierl, Maurine M.; Mayers, Kim L.; McAbee, Karen N.; Miller,
David G. PCS.; Nelson, Gregory G.; pentrain; Peterson, Jim H.; Peterson,
Keri; stevenkari; Trainer, Christa L.; tres
Subject: FW: different Florida election Ballot

-

 - BallotWPBF11__.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 04:18
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Lexi Elliott @ ENRON                           09/12/2000 01:05 PM

To: Stan Dowell/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Atkinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sally
Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Coats/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ethan Schultz/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Alejandro Hernandez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Rogers
Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, David Shields/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter
N Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Swank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Layne/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marshall
Eubank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Maestas/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Davoli/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Deirdre McCaffrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, TJ Rylander/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Priya Jaisinghani/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jonathan Roumel/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Todd Van Roten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Tilney/HOU/EES@EES, Chuck Randall/HOU/EES@EES,
Brad Alford/ECP/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Henderson/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Courtney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derryl Cleaveland/NA/Enron@ENRON, Larry
Abbott/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mo Bawa/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Chris Loehr/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Pyke/AP/Enron@Enron, Ken Tate/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hans Oliver
Pereira/HOU/EES@EES, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tamara
Hopkins/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Cunningham/HOU/EES@EES, Mark McConnell/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Ronnie Shields/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin
O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Patrick Maloy/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rafael Avila/HOU/EES@EES, Nate Blackburn/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark E
Lindsey/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cedric
Burgher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick L Carson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa B Cousino/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marshall Eubank/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Lynne Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Confer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lanette Earnest/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Cole/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Yang/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Leon Branom/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Zeina El-Azzi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christine
Milliner/Houston/Eott@Eott, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Millie
Gautam/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Donna Hutton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Enron Presentation

Dear Recruiting Team Members:

I am forwarding a copy of the Enron presentation to each of you for review.
Some of you will be asked to do presentations, many will not.  I just wanted
to send it out to various team members in order to give you an idea of our
marketing strategy and information on campus.  This is simply for your
information.  When this presentation is given, it will include  dates
tailored specifically for each campus based on the dates I have set up
through career services.

Have a great day!

Lexi Elliott
3-4585


---------------------- Forwarded by Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2001 10:00
AM ---------------------------
From: Joe Connor@ENRON on 07/02/2001 10:43 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Southern  RTO

I met with Andy Dearman and Bill Newman of Southern on Friday.  They talked
about what is going on with the non-jurisdictional utilities that have signed
a MOU to develop a RTO.  The group has met a couple of times to discuss the
process they will use.  Confidentiality agreements have been signed, so no
details are available, but they have agreed to a voting structure for the
development.  Southern has about one third of the votes (and 65%of the
assets) and it takes at least two other parties agreeing with Southern to
carry a vote.  Southern says they spent a lot of time convincing the other
parties that Southern was not going to run, or dominate, the process.  After
that, Southern said the group started to pull together and get organized for
the development.

They said everyone in the group appeared to be ready to find ways to make the
RTO work and resolve the hurdles the non-jurisdictional utilities have been
expressing with the development of other RTOs.  They said there were some
rough spots that had to be resolved and they couldn't be sure agreement would
be reached, but at this point there was a lot of cooperation.

Andy and Bill wanted to convince me that this was not a delaying tactic by
Southern and they were doing everything possible to ensure that a complete
RTO filing could be ready by 12/15/01.  They also said they thought this is
what Ed Holland wanted to discuss with Steve Kean.

We talked about how other stakeholders could have input to the development.
They said that it was too early to make any commitment, but the group had
started thinking about it and they expected an input process to be available
by late summer.
They said Southern was in favor of some process that would provide
stakeholders the opportunity to look at what was being considered and advise
the development group as early as possible.  They said they understood the
difficulty stakeholders had with the approach Southern used in its initial
filing and wanted to do it different, but they pointed out again that
Southern could not dictate the process that would be allowed by the group.
In the meantime, they said if we wanted to provide position papers on any
part of the RTO development they would make sure the papers were circulated
in the group or we could continue to hold bilateral discussions with them or
other members of the development group.

Jim, I still think it would be worthwhile to have a meeting between Ed and
Steve Kean, and I would include you and invite Andy and Bill to come.  I
don't think they want to discuss anything technical at this point; they just
want to convince Enron that the approach Southern is taking provides the
quickest development of a RTO for the Southern area, and they want any help
we can give in convincing FERC to let this process run.

I also think we need to pass on filing a response to Southern's May 15th
status report, either alone or with Alabama Municipal Electric Authority (
Donna, I guess that's who you meant in the memo below, since AEC has signed a
MOU with Southern?).  I will get in touch with Bob Reilley to find out why we
haven't heard from EPSA on its filing.  I still think that's the best
approach.

	Donna Fulton
	06/28/2001 12:02 PM

		 To: Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Southern  supplemental status report

I am attaching the supplemental status report that Southern filed in its
RT01-77 on June 20.  They have included MOUs with Georgia Transmission Corp,
Santee Cooper and Alabama Electric Coop to work on development of an RTO.
These are really general, more of the same of what we've seen from Southern.

Also we had talked  about possible comments on the May 15 Southern filing;
Coral was working on comments through EPSA.  Nothing has been filed by EPSA
yet.

Alabama did file comments on the May 15 status report and they have asked
that the FERC establish a technical conference to "publicly air and evaluate
the alleged governance concerns and the concerns regarding significant
delay..."  Following a technical conference, they ask for a judge to convene
a settlement conference at FERC to "undertake a properly supervised and
serious development of an RTO for the SE without further wasted time."

At this point we could consider filing comments in support of the Coop
comments.


Notice No. 00-367
October 27, 2000

To:
All NYMEX Members
All NYMEX Members Firms
All NYMEX Clearing Members
All NYMEX Operations Managers

From:  Rob Stasi, Manager

Re:  Revised ) Crude Oil Futures Expiration Date

It has come to the attention of the Exchange that some earlier publications
may contain an incorrect Futures expiration date.  Please be advised that the
expiration date for the Crude Oil Futures December 2000 contract month (CL
Z00), has been revised to Friday November 17, 2000.

Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact the Floor
Departments Systems Area at (212) 299-2626.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-367)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Re-sending . . .

---------- Forwarded Message ----------

FROM:      System Administrator <postmaster@spurr-remac.org>
TO:      Michael Rochman <rochmanm@spurr.org>
DATE:      Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:22:03 -0700

RE:      Undeliverable: FWD: DA Draft Petition for rehearing

Your message

 To:      Jeff Dasovich
 Cc:      Dorothy Rothrock
 Subject: FWD: DA Draft Petition for rehearing
 Sent:    Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:20:09 -0700

did not reach the following recipient(s):

Jeff Dasovich on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:22:03 -0700
   The recipient name is not recognized
    The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=diablo
education;l=SERVER0109262320S8CMBHG3
   MSEXCH:IMS:Diablo Educational Consultants:SERVER:SERVER 3550
(000B09AA) 550 5.1.1 <JeffDasovich@enron.com>... User unknown

-- NextPart --
Encapsulated message follows:

Jeff,

Per our telephone conversation, you can add SPURR as a listed supporter
of the filing attached to Dorothy's email.

Thanks and good luck.

Michael Rochman
Managing Director
School Project for Utility Rate Reduction (SPURR)

---------- Forwarded Message ----------

FROM:      Dorothy Rothrock <drothrock@cmta.net>
TO:      "Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>
DATE:      Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:15:10 -0700

RE:      DA Draft Petition for rehearing

DA Coalition,

FYI -

AReM will be filing a petition for rehearing of the CPUC decision to
suspend
direct access on friday - a draft is attached.

To include your organization in this filing, contact Jeff Dasovich at
415-782-7822.


Hello Greg.? My accounting group in Boston has informed me that the $100k
consulting invoice dated April 3 remains outstanding.? I'd appreciate your
following up to find out status.? Thanks in advance.? Neil.

?


I am planning on being in Houston on November 1st and 2nd.  As I want to meet briefly with each of you, please email me if you are not going to be in the office on these days.  I can adjust my trip if necessary.

Thanks
Garrett
416/865-3709


Oh be still my aching heart,
filled with bitter sorrow at my loss, (sniff)

I'm ready to move to Ohio and become a pig farmer and work on my poetry!!


I went through our Lotus Notes Master Swap Agreement Database and determined
that the following masters do not permit power:

The Bakersfield Californian    newprint only
Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG   no commodity transactions
CGAS, Inc.      natural gas only (are currently shut down for trading because
authority certificate only covered one trade)
Coastal Gas Marketing Company   natural gas transactions only
Credit Lyonnais New York Branch (AAA Program) no commodity transactions
E.W. Scripps Company (The)    48.8 gram newsprint swaps only
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.   no commodity transactions.  Weather
is ok
Mellon Bank NA     FX and currency option transactions only
Midland Bank plc     FX and currency option transactions only
National Westminster Bank    FX and currency option transactions only
Palladium Insurance Limited    weather only
Phibro, Inc.      energy price swaps based on fixed and floating prices of
natural gas, crude oil or oil products and/or call        and put options
based on the prices of natural gas, crude oil or oil products

Praxair, Inc.      natural gas only
PXRE Corporation     weather only
St. Paul Re (Bermuda) Ltd.    weather only
Tempest Reinsurance Company Limited  weather only
Westdeutsche Landesbank Gironzentrale  FX and currency option transactions
only


Further to our conversation,  as requested please see the attached.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I would definitely talk with Wes Colwell about doing the presentation on
Business Analysis & Reporting.  I think that he would do a great job!


I can be on the call.  Please let me know if you get this, since I've been
having severe email problems.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff

gramlr@pjm.com on 08/25/2000 07:04:27 AM
To: MichaelBerg@ICFConsulting.com, whederman@columbiaenergygroup.com,
doornbos@socrates.berkeley.edu, amosher@appanet.org,
hcameron@uclink.berkeley.edu, lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu,
jeff.dasovich@enron.com
cc: jalamo@enron.com
Subject: Tentative meeting Monday 8/28 at 5 pm/2 pm

  Please confirm that this schedule works.  It is the only day
that worked for everyone.  Jeff Dasovich is still in the Sierras so I can
check
in with him Monday.

  The agenda sounds simple but don't be deceived, there are many
many options.  Please be prepared with a list of 3 top speaker choices.

  1.  Topics of panels.

  2.  Speaker list.  Try to agree on an 'A' list who we can start
calling and a 'B' list of alternates.


Guys, I have explained the strategy/tactics that have lead to this position
in some detail.  In my opinion the company is not at risk and potentially ENA
could create significant value from a project that we have very little
invested.  I understand the construction risk on the bid as much as anyone
and we have no intention of lifting their offer. As far as EECC involvement,
as I had mentioned, Coleman was a part of all these discussions.  I will
argue that Mike and the ENA deal team made the right call necessary to
maximize return in the short run for Enron without investing significant
dollars or taking significant risks.

Obviously, I was unsuccessful in explaining such a sophisticated strategy.

Regards
Delainey

---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
07:01 PM ---------------------------

Dick Westfahl@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/26/2000 09:30 AM
To: Dave Delainey
cc: Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Las Vegas CoGen

Dave:

See attached memo.

Thanks,

Dick


Please see attached.  Also, I will be out of the office on Monday, April 9.
Please contact Tom Moran for any EOL-related issues; thanks.


The report named: CE P/L <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=4&report_name=CE+P/L&category_cd=3&category_name=CENTRAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=3&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/19/2001>, published as of 11/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


----- Forwarded by Jim Fallon/Enron Communications on 11/13/00 07:31 AM -----

	jperl@sempratrading.com
	11/13/00 07:00 AM

		 To: rajelpy@aol.com
		 cc: (bcc: Jim Fallon/Enron Communications)
		 Subject: New coordinates

Jay Perl
Sempra Energy Trading

phone: 203-355-5074
cell: 914-261-6025
email: jperl@sempratrading.com

****************************************************************************
This e-mail contains privileged attorney-client communications and/or
confidential information, and is only for the use by the intended recipient.
Receipt by an unintended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any
applicable privilege.

Reading, disclosure, discussion, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this information by anyone other than the intended recipient or his or her
employees or agents is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us and delete the original
material from your computer.

Sempra Energy Trading Corp. (SET) is not the same company as SDG&E or
SoCalGas, the utilities owned by SET's parent company.  SET is not regulated
by the California Public Utilities Commission and you do not have to buy
SET's products and services to continue to receive quality regulated service
from the utilities.
****************************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 05/14/2001 01:01 PM
---------------------------

Kimberly Bates
05/14/2001 12:52 PM
To: Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam
Arteaga/Enron@EnronXGate, Laura Vuittonet/Enron@EnronXGate, Becky
Young/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: ICE Presentation

Pam Anderson from Intercontinental Exchange will be giving an ICE
presentation on May 22 in EB 32c2.  Please let me know if  you plan on
attending.


I don't know, I guess Zack has never been to an apartment before and he
thought that it looked like a Hotel.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 6:35 AM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: Re: FW: hi!

So what is this "living in a hotel" shit?


I would like to move to the new garage.

Thanks,

Kay Mann

Parking & Transportation
05/03/2001 03:08 PM
Sent by: DeShonda Hamilton
To: Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica I Arriaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Barber/Enron@EnronXGate, Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christine
Drummond/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hal Elrod/Enron@EnronXGate,
Lisa Gillette/Enron@EnronXGate, Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Kerrigan/Enron@EnronXGate, Kevin
Kuykendall/Enron@EnronXGate, Andrew H Lewis/Enron@EnronXGate, Molly
Magee/Enron@EnronXGate, Kim Melodick/Enron@EnronXGate, Chris
Meyer/Enron@EnronXGate, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Norden/Enron@EnronXGate, Laura Podurgiel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel R
Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janelle Scheuer/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan Scott/enron@enronXgate, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Adriana Celedon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Graves/Enron@EnronXGate, Wilford
Stevens/Enron@EnronXGate, Soo-Lian Eng Ervin/Enron@EnronXGate, Dorie
Hitchcock/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle
Kettler/Enron@EnronXGate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brad
McSherry/Enron@EnronXGate, Patti Sullivan/Enron@EnronXGate, Hope
Vargas/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Louis Allen/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Woods/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raquel
Lopez/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Enron Center Garage

The Enron Center Garage has opened.

Employees who work for business units that are scheduled to move to the new
building and currently park in the Allen Center and Metropolitan garage are
being offered a parking space in the new Enron Center garage.

This is the only offer you will receive during the initial migration to the
new garage. Spaces will be filled on a first come first served basis. The
cost for the new garage will be the same as Allen Center garage which is
currently $165.00 per month, less the company subsidy, leaving a monthly
employee cost of $94.00.

If you choose not to accept this offer at this time, you may add your name to
the Enron Center garage waiting list at a later day and offers will be made
as spaces become available.

The Saturn Sky Ring  that connects the garage and both buildings will not be
opened until summer 2001. All initial parkers will have to use the street
level entrance to Enron Center North until Saturn Sky Ring access is
available. Garage stairways next to the elevator lobbies at each floor may be
used as an exit in the event of elevator trouble.

If you are interested in accepting this offer, please reply via email to
Parking and Transportation as soon as you reach a decision. Following your
email, arrangements will be made for you to turn in your old parking card and
receive a parking transponder along with a new information packet for the new
garage.

The Parking and Transportation desk may be reached via email at Parking and
Transportation/Corp/Enron or 713-853-7060  with any questions.

(You may enter & exit on Clay St. and Bell St., also pedestrians, will have
to use the garage stairwell located on the corner of Bell & Smith.)

Please respond via e-mail if you are interested in acquiring one of these
spaces.


Please find out what you can about which issues FERC is interested in on the
Gallup rehearing requests.  I.e., did they issue the tolling order because of
our rehearing arguments on the confidentiality issue or SoCal's on the rate
discrimination issues?  Anything you learn would be helpful, but this info is
not so important that risks should be taken to get it.  Thanks.  DF.


Chris--In the spreadsheet that I sent you yesterday, please note that row
251should be hidden.  That line shows the total volumes for the month of
February.  Line 252 shows the corresponding daily amounts.   Sorry for any
confusion.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317


John, I like the report.  Nice job.
m


I think it's a good idea since the provisional application is on file -
Travis is the internal lawyer who has taken care of the patent application so
he will have better ideas for where the words should be placed and
appropriate look and feel (I would guess near the copyright notice and
roughly equivalent size).

	David Forster@ENRON
	07/17/2000 06:15 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Patent Pending

Mark,

We are thinking of adding a Patent Pending message to key EnronOnline pages
(like the homepage). Can you offer comments/concerns/guidelines?

Dave


Dear Derivatives Week subscriber:

Catch the latest breaking news in this week's issue by clicking
here: http://www.derivativesweek.com

Top stories this week:
_________________________

At this year's International Swaps and Derivatives Association
meeting, which drew the largest crowd ever, Internet and e-commerce
issues were on everybody's mind and crept into most presentations
and discussions.

Leading U.S. banking agencies have proposed changes to their
risk-based capital rules to address the exposure of banks, bank holding
companies? and thrifts to credit risk. The paper proposes, among other
things, that credit derivatives be included in the definitions of credit risk
arising from securitizations and that the capital charge be based on the
credit rating of the underlying obligation.

Merrill Lynch is reorganizing its global debt group and recently appointed
Dow Kim to a new position as head of the newly formed integrated global
enterprise solutions group. The move is meant to integrate the bank's
previously less centralized derivatives businesses.

Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction Co., the South Korea ship
building and construction giant, is considering its first use of U.S.
dollar/Korean won currency options and interest-rate swaps.

_________________________

As a DW subscriber, you are eligible for complimentary access to the
Subscribers Only area of the <www.derivativesweek.com> site, which
contains the current issue and a searchable archive of all past issues.
Use your User ID and Password to access the entire site. If you don't
have these yet, hit 'REPLY' to this email, fill out the proper information
below, and send it back to me. I'll get you set up right away!

===============================

Newsletter Title:
My name is:
My company is:
My city location is:

I choose my new user name to be:
I choose my new password to be:

===============================
?
If you'd prefer, call our Customer Service Department at 212-224-3800
and give them the information above.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
YOUR USER NAME AND PASSWORD ARE FOR YOUR PERSONAL
USE ONLY.? THEY MAY NOT BE SHARED WITH ANYONE AND
NO ONE ELSE SHOULD ACCESS THE SITE WITH YOUR USER NAME
AND PASSWORD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please do not hesitate
to call me at 1-212-224-3034.

Thanks and enjoy this week's issue.

Jim Beecher
Publisher

NOTE: You will receive weekly updates of the hottest stories in
Derivatives Week. These are not random mass mailings but
rather one-time messages for your personal attention. If you do
not wish to continue to receive these notices, please click 'reply',
type 'remove' and enter your name and company. You will then
be removed from our email database.


don't I wish!  I usually get Linda Evans (you know...that big hair in Dynasty)

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	03/20/2001 05:07 PM

		 To: Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: can you send info

I saw a picture today, and now i know who you remind me of!  Sue Landwehr:
talks like marge, looks like elle mcpherson.


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 04/05/2001 08:37 AM -----

	"Steven Kelly" <steven@iepa.com>
	04/04/2001 05:47 PM

		 To: "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'" <alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson
(E-mail)'" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Escalante (E-mail)'" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Gates (E-mail)'"
<bob.gates@enron.com>, "Bob Szymanski (E-mail)"
<rjszymanski@powerworksinc.com>, "'Carolyn A Baker (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "'David Parquet'"
<david.parquet@enron.com>, "'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'"
<dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <dkk@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'" <dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'"
<ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'" <eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa
(E-mail)'" <frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<fblaylock@covantaenergy.com>, "'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>,
"'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'" <Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'"
<jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jack Pigott (E-mail)'" <jackp@calpine.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>,
"'John Stout (E-mail)'" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall
(E-mail)'" <jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'"
<CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>,
"'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'" <khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett
(E-mail)'" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Kent Palmerton'"
<kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "Mark Fillinger (E-mail)"
<mark.fillinger@enron.com>, "Marty McFadden (E-mail)"
<mmcfadden@covantaenergy.com>, "Paula Soos (E-mail)"
<psoos@covantaenergy.com>, "Rachel King (E-mail)" <rachel.king@elpaso.com>,
"'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe
(E-mail)" <rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'"
<roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Stephanie Newell (E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Steve
Lliff (E-mail)'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Susan J Mara (E-mail)'" <smara@enron.com>, "'Tony
Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "'William Hall (E-mail)'"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>
		 cc: "Andy Brown (E-mail)" <andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Carol Hudson
(E-mail)'" <carol@iepa.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'" <smutny@iepa.com>,
"'Katie Kaplan (E-mail)'" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "'Steven Kelly (E-mail)'"
<steven@iepa.com>
		 Subject: Update on Senate Windfall Profits tax lang.

As expected, the Senate Revenue and Tax Committe voted out SB1X, the
Windfall Tax Bill (see attached bill language).  While the co-author noted
it was a "work in progress," he noted that he envisioned a program wherein
150% of the existing corporate rate would apply to the "excess profits."
This approach would result in a tax rate of approximately 13.5 percent
applied to the "excess proftis."

IEP testified against the bill (see attached IEP letter opposing the bill).
In response to questions, the author indicated the intent was not to "go
after QFs", but he also presumed that QFs were not receiving "gross
profits."  Questions left unanswered included:  would the tax apply to
municipal entities; how would the tax apply to out-of-state entities; what
would be the impact on system sales and reliability;  what would be the
impact on incentives for new development.

The bill is expected to move to the Senate Appropriations Committee.
However, the Appropriations Committee is not expected to take the bill up
this week, and the members apparently are still planning on taking a recess
next week.

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol Hudson [mailto:carol@iepa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 4:44 PM
To: Steven Kelly (E-mail)
Subject: FW: windfall profits tax lang.

 - windfall profits tax bill    4-04-01.doc
 - Senate Bill 1.rtf


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001
11:21 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/02/2001 09:29 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--4/02/01


I think Tanya worked on this.  FYI, I'll be in Argentina next week.  SS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000
09:03 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris H Foster                           02/23/2000 05:50 PM

To: Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Arco

Tracy:

We reached basic agreement with Arco Products Company on a 1 year deal as
summarized on the attached draft contract (this contract needs some work, but
you can get the gist of it). It is like the Delano deal, but with no
Ancillary Sercvices.  Could you please do a credit review for preparation of
a Master and send it to Christian?  We have told them they would have a draft
master by Monday of next week.  I am working on wrapping the Confirm into
shape.

The counterparty will be Atlantic Richield Company.  They will not give us a
corporate guaranty, but they want a guaranty from us.  We have a swap deal
with them in place.  It was done as a one-off transaction (not a master).
Sara Shackleton was our attorney repsonsible for that deal.  Enron Corp.
posted a guaranty on that deal that I think has some negotiated terms and
conditions.  They want to use the exact same pro forma.  Culd you find that
and begin the process of getting one for this new deal?

Arco is concerned about set offs amongst various Arco facilities.  They want
to limit this transaction to a single generation facility.  Is this OK?

PS  What is Enron Credit.com?  Do you have any options on the equity offering?


Element Name: WOMANIUM
Symbol: WO
Atomic Weight: (don't even go there)
Physical properties: Generally soft and round in form.
Boils at nothing and may freeze any time. Melts when
treated properly. Very bitter if not used well.
Chemical properties: Very active. Highly unstable.
Possesses Strong affinity with gold, silver, platinum,
and precious stones. Violent when left alone. Able to
absorb great amounts of exotic food. Turns slightly
green when placed next to a better specimen.
Usage: Highly ornamental. An extremely good catalyst
for dispersion of wealth. Probably the most powerful
income reducing agent known.
CAUTION: Highly explosive in inexperienced hands!
------------------------------------------------
Element Name: MANIUM
Symbol: XY
Atomic Weight: (180 +/- 50)
Physical properties: Solid at room temperature,
but gets bent out of shape easily. Fairly dense and
sometimes flaky. Difficult to find a pure sample. Due to
rust, aging samples are unable to create electricity as
easily as younger samples.
Chemical properties: Attempts to bond with WO any
chance it can get. Also tends to form strong bonds with
itself. Becomes explosive when mixed with KD
(Element: CHILDIUM) for prolonged periods of time.
Neutralize by saturating with alcohol.
Usage: None known. Possibly good methane source.
Good samples are able to produce large quantities on
command.
CAUTION: In the absence of WO, this element rapidly
decomposes and begins to smell.

Tim
Timothy R. Miller
Asset Manager
BP Energy Company
Voice: 281-366-4965
Fax: 281-366-4932
Mobile: 281-380-0410


i am going to take that friday off and come in to br.  maybe we should set up
a tee time around 2 or 3 pm.


Hi Vince, I talked to Tom Gros today and metioned our desire to estabilish a
strategic relationship with Nick Bambos and his research effort.  Tom is very
excited about the idea and was willing to cut the check.  I suggested that we
have more of a strategic relationship in mine (Enron / Stanford) and he
agreed to that as well.  Tom mentioned that Greg Whalley was interested in
estabilishing such a relationship.  Vince, could you follow this up and
ground this? If you need any help in doing the leg work, I'll happy to do
that.

Tom is excited about EBS research's role to support all of EBS including
bandwidth trading. He seems very interested in being our sponsor on the EBS
side. That would be very beneficial to us since he is involved in all senior
management decision through Kevin Hannon.  Vince, I would suggest that you
try to setup a meeting with Kevin Hannon and Tom to discuss this further.
Tom is also very interested in the New Product development effort that Larry
and I have been kicking around for some time.  He wanted us to sit back and
think of structured products with better margins that Blend & Extend that
they are selling. He wanted to know now much more resource that we need in
that front.  For this, I would like to get someone like Meera Natarajan. She
is an originator currently working in EES and have talked to Zimin and
Stinson. She is sufficiently analytical with commercial mind set to help with
new product ideas and to ground them.

Regards,

Ravi.


continental.com Specials for Jane Tholt
Tuesday, January 1, 2002
****************************************

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Continental makes it easy to unwind with an additional 10% off select sale fares to destinations in North America and Europe.  Hurry, seats are limited and this sale ends January 15, 2002.

Purchase your eTickets now at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*VA

EARN UP TO 20,000 BONUS MILES*
Now through February 15, 2002, we'll reward you with additional OnePass miles every time you purchase an eTicket on continental.com and fly - and that's in addition to your actual flight miles.

View all the details and register at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*XA

* NOTE: Bonus Mile offer does not apply to continental.com Specials.

TRAVEL UPDATES
Be sure to check continental.com at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*YA
before leaving for the airport. We're looking forward to welcoming you onboard!

****************************************
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. This Week's Destinations
2. Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Doubletree Hotels & Resorts, & Embassy Suites Hotels Offers
3. Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts, Four Points by Sheraton, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels Offers
4. Alamo Rent A Car Offers
5. National Car Rental Offers

****************************************
1. THIS WEEK'S DESTINATIONS

Depart Saturday, January 5 and return on either Monday, January 7 or Tuesday, January 8, 2002. Please see the Terms and Conditions listed at the end of this e-mail.

For OnePass members, here are special opportunities to redeem miles for travel to the following destinations. As an additional benefit, OnePass Elite members can travel using the miles below as the only payment necessary. The following are this week's OnePass continental.com Specials.

To use your OnePass miles (as listed below) to purchase continental.com Specials, you must call 1-800-642-1617.

THERE WILL NOT BE AN ADDITIONAL $20 CHARGE WHEN REDEEMING ONEPASS MILES FOR CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS THROUGH THE TOLL FREE RESERVATIONS NUMBER.

If you are not using your OnePass miles, purchase continental.com Specials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*ZA
You can also purchase continental.com Specials for an additional cost of $20 per ticket through our telephone service at 1-800-642-1617.

**********************************************
ROUND-TRIP TRAVEL MAY ORIGINATE IN EITHER CITY
**********************************************
****Roundtrip BETWEEN CLEVELAND, OH and:

$29 + 12,500 Miles or $119 - Milwaukee, WI

****Roundtrip BETWEEN HOUSTON, TX and:

$29 + 10,000 Miles or $109 - Alexandria, LA
$29 + 12,500 Miles or $119 - Amarillo, TX
$29 + 10,000 Miles or $109 - Beaumont/Pt. Arthur, TX
$29 + 10,000 Miles or $109 - Gulfport/Biloxi, MS
$29 + 12,500 Miles or $119 - Tulsa, OK

****Roundtrip BETWEEN NEW YORK/NEWARK and:

$29 + 12,500 Miles or $119 - Albany, NY
$29 + 12,500 Miles or $119 - Greensboro/Piedmont Triad, NC
$29 + 15,000 Miles or $159 - Kansas City, MO
$29 + 12,500 Miles or $129 - Nashville, TN
$29 + 15,000 Miles or $159 - New Orleans, LA
$29 + 10,000 Miles or $109 - Norfolk, VA
$29 + 10,000 Miles or $109 - Portland, ME
$29 + 10,000 Miles or $109 - Richmond, VA
$29 + 10,000 Miles or $109 - Syracuse, NY

********************************
2. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM HILTON HOTELS AND RESORTS, DOUBLETREE
HOTELS AND RESORTS, AND EMBASSY SUITES HOTELS

The following rates are available January 5 - January 7, 2002 and are priced per night.
--------------------------------------
Cleveland, OH - Hilton Garden Inn, Cleveland Airport - $79

Houston, TX - Embassy Suites Hotel Houston, Near The Galleria - $130
Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Hobby Airport - $88
Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Westchase and Towers - $149

Nashville, TN - Hilton Suites Nashville, Downtown - $109

Newark, NJ - Doubletree Club Suites Jersey City, Jersey City  NJ - $149 (January 5-6 only)
Newark, NJ - Hilton Pearl River, Pearl River  NY - $125

To book this week's special rates for Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*AA
Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subject to availability. Check hilton.com for specific dates at each Hilton Family Hotel. Or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates. Restrictions apply to these rates.

****************************************
3. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS LAST-MINUTE WEEKEND RATES FROM WESTIN HOTELS & RESORTS, SHERATON HOTELS & RESORTS, FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON, ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS

There are no offerings from Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts, Four Points by Sheraton, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels this week.

********************************
4. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM ALAMO RENT A CAR

Rates listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations only. Other car types may be available. Rates are valid for rentals on Saturday, January 5 with returns Monday, January 7 or Tuesday, January 8, 2002.
-------------------------------
$17 a day in: Milwaukee, WI (MKE)
$18 a day in: Greensboro/Piedmont Triad, NC (GSO)
$18 a day in: Houston, TX (IAH)
$18 a day in: Kansas City, MO (MCI)
$18 a day in: Nashville, TN (BNA)
$18 a day in: Tulsa, OK (TUL)
$20 a day in: Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$26 a day in: New Orleans, LA (MSY)
$26 a day in: Newark, NJ (EWR)

To receive continental.com Specials discounted rates, simply make advance reservations and be sure to request ID # 596871 and Rate Code 33. Book your reservation online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*BA
or contact Alamo at 1-800 GO ALAMO.

*If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, Alamo offers great rates when you book online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*CA
For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and conditions below.

****************************************
5. CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS FROM NATIONAL CAR RENTAL

Rates listed below are valid on intermediate class vehicles at airport locations only. Other car types may be available. Rates are valid for rentals on Saturday, January 5 with returns Monday, January 7 or Tuesday, January 8, 2002.
------------------------------------------
$21 a day in: Amarillo, TX (AMA)
$21 a day in: Greensboro/Piedmont Triad, NC (GSO)
$21 a day in: Gulfport/Biloxi, MS (GPT)
$21 a day in: Houston, TX (IAH)
$21 a day in: Kansas City, MO (MCI)
$21 a day in: Nashville, TN (BNA)
$21 a day in: Syracuse, NY (SYR)
$21 a day in: Tulsa, OK (TUL)
$23 a day in: Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$28 a day in: Alexandria, LA (AEX)
$28 a day in: Norfolk, VA (ORF)
$28 a day in: Richmond, VA (RIC)
$29 a day in: New Orleans, LA (MSY)
$29 a day in: Newark, NJ (EWR)

To receive continental.com Specials discounted rates, simply make your reservations in advance and be sure to request Product Code COOLUS. To make your reservation, contact National at 1-800-CAR-RENT (1-800-227-7368), or book your reservation online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*DA
Please enter COOLUS in the Product Rate Code field, and 5037126 in the Contract ID field to ensure you get these rates on these dates.

* If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, National offers great rates when you book online at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*VUA
For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and conditions below.

****************************************
CONTINENTAL.COM SPECIALS RULES:
Fares include a $37.20 fuel surcharge.  Passenger Facility Charges, up to $18 depending on routing, are not included. Up to $2.75 per segment federal excise tax, as applicable, is not included.  Applicable International and or Canadian taxes and fees up to $108, varying by destination, are not included and may vary slightly depending on currency exchange rate at the time of purchase. For a complete listing of rules please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*VVA

ALAMO RENT A CAR'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Taxes (including VLF taxes up to US$1.89 per day in California and GST), other governmentally-authorized or imposed surcharges, license recoupment fees, fuel, additional driver fee, drop charges and optional items (such as CDW Waiver Savers(R) up to US$18.99 a day,) are extra. Renter must meet standard age, driver and credit requirements. Rates higher for drivers under age 25. Concession recoupment fees may add up to 14% to the rental rate at some on-airport locations. Up to 10.75% may be added to the rental rate if you rent at an off-airport location and exit on our shuttle bus. Weekly rates require a 5-day minimum rental or daily rates apply. For weekend rates, the vehicle must be picked up after 9 a.m. on Thursday and returned before midnight on Monday or higher daily rates apply. 24-hour advance reservation required. May not be combined with other discounts. Availability is limited. All vehicles must be returned to the country of origin. Offer not valid in San Jose, CA.

NATIONAL CAR RENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Customer must provide Contract ID# at the time of reservation to be eligible for discounts. Offer valid at participating National locations in the US and Canada. Minimum rental age is 25. This offer is not valid with any other special discount or promotion. Standard rental qualifications apply. Subject to availability and blackout dates. Advance reservations required. Geographic driving restrictions may apply.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR WESTIN, SHERATON, FOUR POINTS,
ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS:
Offer is subject to availability. Advance Reservations required and is based on single/double occupancy. Offer not applicable to group travel. Additional Service charge and tax may apply. The discount is reflected in the rate quoted. Offer valid at participating hotel only. Offer valid for stays on Fri - Mon with a Friday or Saturday night arrival required. Rate available for this coming weekend only. Offer available only by making reservations via the internet. A limited number of rooms may be available at these rates.

---------------------------------------
This e-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary products of Continental Airlines, Inc. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly prohibited.

****************************************
If you need assistance please visit:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*VWA
View our privacy policy at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*VXA

This e-mail was sent to: jtholt@enron.com
You registered with OnePass Number: sc266224

TO UNSUBSCRIBE:
We hope you will find continental.com Specials a valuable source of information. However, if you prefer not to take advantage of this opportunity, please let us know by visiting the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*VZA

TO SUBSCRIBE:
Please visit the continental.com Specials page on our web site at:
http://continentalairlines.rsc01.net/servlet/cc4?JHEVAZ*qmohsmQLgkhgEJht*z*VYA


nerve emailed me back and wants to get together for a drink.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
03:44 PM ---------------------------

"Andreas Simou" <andreas.simou@garp.com> on 01/30/2001 08:24:38 AM
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: <Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com>
Subject: The GARP Convention: Instructions to Chair

Dear Vince
?
The GARP 2001 Convention is nearly upon us! At this  time, I would like to
send you some information concerning the Convention and  the stream that you
will be Chairing on Tuesday 13th February.
?
When you arrive at the Convention, please make your  way to the Convention
Registration desk, where I will greet you and register you  for the event. I
will then show you to your conference room. As speakers arrive,  I will
introduce them to you.
?
As Chair, you will introduce and sum-up?the  stream.?You will also introduce
individual speakers. Attached are the  biographies of the speakers that will
be presenting during your stream. May I  recommend that you read these in the
meantime and also bring them with you on  the day so as you can introduce the
speakers prior to their presentations. Below  is an outline of the order of
speakers in your stream.
?
I have allocated 40 minutes per session, with five  minutes between sessions
for change around time between speakers. Most speakers  will speak for 30-35
minutes and allow about 10 minutes for Q and A. Should a  speaker?seem like
they are reaching the limits of their time, the Chair  will bring this
to?their attention prior to the last?5 minutes  allocated to them.?It is also
the role of the Chair to?ask the  delegates for questions, asking each
questioner?for their name and the  organisation they represent. Should
delegates be a little slow on?the Q and  A take-up, often the Chair will have
some thought-provoking questions to put  forward. I shall ensure that there
are GARP people in the room with microphones  to hand to delegates with a
question.
?
There may be occasion for the Chair  to?announce some housekeeping on behalf
of GARP.
?
If you have any questions?please do not  hesitate to contact me, otherwise I
look forward to meeting you in a couple of  weeks.
?
Kind regards
?
Andreas?

?

TRACK ) 4 ENERGY  RISK

Measuring Energy Risk )  Tackling Price Volatility, Adapting VaR, Scenario
Modeling and Regulatory  Requirements

Vince Kaminski, Enron  NA

Energy Credit Risk  Management

Baxter Gillette, Ameren  Energy

The Volatility Challenge:  Efficient Modelling of Price Volatility for  Energy

Spyros Maragos, Dynegy  Inc.

Lunch

TRACK ) 4 CORPORATE RISK

Modeling Corporate Risk at  Ford ) Risk Management from a Shareholder Value
Perspective

Freeman Wood, Ford Motor  Company

Enhancing Shareholder Value  through Alternative Risk Transfer ) A
Manufacturer,s  Perspective

Ash Srivastava, Bombardier  Inc.

Coffee  Break

All Bets are On: Enterprise  Risk Management 2001

James Lam,  Erisk

Understanding the Scope of  Reputational Risk Events ) Whether Prevention is
Possible, Risk Indicators  and Establishing a Risk-Conscious Culture

Peter Schofield, American  Express

_____________________________
Andreas Simou
GARP, Conference  Director
Tel? +44 (0)20 7626 9301
Fax +44 (0)20 7626  9900
andreas.simou@garp.com
?
Don't miss the GARP 2001 Convention,
program details via  our web site
www.garp.com
 - Gillette-bio.doc
 - Wood-bio.doc
 - Srivastava-Bio.doc
 - Lam-bio.doc
 - Schofield-bio.doc


Your running backs suck.  I will give you Raymont Harris and Wayne Chrebet
for Freeman.


<<BETA & Fee Agreement -TradeSpark, L.P.>> Your message

  To:      Williams, Mike
  Cc:      Daniel.Diamond@enron.com; Michael.Bridges@enron.com;
Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
  Subject: BETA & Fee Agreement -TradeSpark, L.P.
  Sent:    Wed, 23 May 2001 18:24:58 -0400

was delivered to the following recipient(s):

Williams, Mike on Wed, 23 May 2001 18:25:15 -0400
    MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:US-Exchange:CFNYEXCH04

Message-ID: <OF8E7886F0.33E927BF-ON86256A55.007AC46B@enron.com>
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com
To: "Williams, Mike" <MWilliams@tradespark.com>
Cc: Daniel.Diamond@enron.com, Michael.Bridges@enron.com,
Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
Subject: BETA & Fee Agreement -TradeSpark, L.P.
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 18:24:58 -0400
Return-Receipt-To: Tana.Jones@enron.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


The ClickAtHome Database shows that you have placed an order with Dell
Computer with an order number of 537808172. Please read below for
instructions:

1.  If this is correct, enjoy your computer!
    You can check your order status by clicking here:
      http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp

      ** For questions about your order/changes/problems,
         call 1-866-220-3355 **

2.  If you did NOT place an order with Dell for the ClickAtHome program,
    please email enron@avenueb2e.com or call 713-895-9087 to report
    the incorrect order on your behalf.

Thank you!

ClickAtHome Team!


Enjoy!
 - 20011109ERCOT_LOAD.XLS
 - 20011109ERCOT_FLOW.XLS


re: Coal fired plant we discussed with Mitch and John.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2001 03:58
PM ---------------------------

John Moore
04/04/2001 10:27 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: BPUB LOI

Kay,

I fiddled a little with the BPUB LOI.  You can see the redlined changes in
the attached document.  Kathleen FEDEX'ed two CA orginals to BPUB yesterday
evening and the plan is for them to sign the CA today, I will then email a
clean LOI to BPUB and to their outside counsel, Davidson, in
San Antonio.

JMoore


Sally and Ted,

Brenda, Vlady and I met today to discuss Project Door Step for Mariner.
Since Mariner is an E&P company rather than a trading company (or so we
think), I believe our approach may be somewhat different from the other
trading reviews.  The review will likely focus on the company's risk
management policies and procedures which we  think relates mostly to hedging
oil and gas production.  Based on a review of the last Mariner 10-Q (Sept
99), it appears the company does a significant amount of hedging with
financial instruments extending out to 2002.  The company also has
significant ($14MM) of deferred losses related to hedging activities.

As discussed with Ted, we have preliminary planned to visit Mariner on Tues.
March 21.  As a starting point,  Vlady is pulling RAROC information related
to Mariner and Brenda is getting all Enron positions with Mariner.  Please
call if you have any questions.

        Thanks,

         Jim


Thanks Bob.  I feel a lot better, particulary since the year end documents
won't have to have all the detail.  DF

	From:  Bob Chandler                           12/11/2000 11:48 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Saunders/FGT/Enron@Enron, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Harry
Walters/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Quarterly Noteholder Reports

Thanks for your comments below.

We consulted our AA folks in drafting the disclosures.  It wasn't a big deal
for Enron's 10Q because the positions between NNG and TW are eliminated in
the consolidated statements.  As for the Form 2 and the Brown Covers, there
are specific GAAP disclosure requirements that we have to include on a
stand-alone basis.  Since most of these positions will be gone by year end,
it won't look nearly as massive as it was at the end of the third quarter.
In fact, if Roger Willard had given us his final word about the transactions
in time, we would have booked the ultimate net transactions in September and
we wouldn't have had all these gross positions.  I don't feel quite as bad
about not getting it right in the unaudited third quarter financials as I
otherwise would, since we did review the transactions and the noteholders
disclosures with AA before the 3rd quarter was released and before the
noteholders reports were distributed.

As always, Legal and Regulatory will have ample opportunity to comment on
Brown Cover and Form 2 disclosures before they are finalized.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           12/11/2000 10:59 AM

To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Quarterly Noteholder Reports

I've reviewed the draft NN and TW quarterly reports to noteholders.  I
haven't had a chance to compare these to prior quarterly filings, but I have
three questions/concerns.  First, the discussions of "Price Risk Management
Activities" seem overly detailed and cumbersome given the true commercial
impact of the deals involved.  For example, we disclose the total notional
amount of gas involved in the Transcanada deal, the "fair value" of the
trades, and a variety of  other details, even the total economic impact of
the deal to us is pretty small (about a million dollars if I remember
right).  The base gas deal, by comparison, was discussed in one sentence.
Can we avoid making the thing look bigger than it really is by disclosing
something more meaningful like VAR (which I assume would be a much smaller
number)?  Second, disclosing TW and NN trading activity separately makes the
Transcanada deal look like a bigger thing than it really was, since the TW
and NN portions offset one another.  I know we need to disclose deals
separately for each operating company, but is there a way things like
notional value and "fair value" (or VAR) can be aggregated to more accurately
reflect the total impact of the deal--currently it looks like both TW and NN
were out doing huge commodity deals.  Third, I have never been that concerned
about overly broad disclosures in the noteholder reports because of the
limited distribution.   However, if these disclosures will be Arthur
Anderson's template for the Enron Corp. 10Q or the FERC Form 2s, I have a
real problem.

Please let me know if I can be of help in talking through these issues.  DF


Conversion to Windows 2000....I think it is a month long process...sorry for
the delay!!

This information is for the private use of the recipient and may not be
disclosed to any other entity (including affiliates) without the prior
written consent of Enron North America.  All of the above prices are
&indicative8 prices  and are subject to change depending upon changing market
conditions and liquidity.  The transactions are also subject to negotiation
of mutually acceptable definitive agreements, satisfactory credit
arrangements and the approval of the respective management,s of our two
companies. This term sheet is not intended to create a binding or enforceable
contract nor is it an offer or a commitment to enter into any transaction.
All terms are subject to change until  agreement as to a specific transaction
has been reached.  ENA is not acting as a fiduciary or advisor and you should
evaluate and understand the terms, conditions, and risks of all transactions
in making your decisions with respect theret


We would like to use 5,000 dth/d  of CES' TCO K#68918 to deliver to COH 5-2
for ROM. Please pull from the pool as TCO said we should be OK. Any problem?


Sally,

This is my stab at a consolidated list from the last 2 weeks.  We may have to
change the format to capture all the issues and explanations, but I wanted
you to have this for your meeting today. Rebooks are on the second sheet in
the workbook, but cover only the last week.

Let me know if you have questions or need additional info. I'll be working
with the business analyst to take over this reporting later this week, so
please comment at your convenience.

Debbie


dearest management,
please see below......  i will be in a bit late for those days when we have
presentations....  i hope not to cause any inconvenience.....
your dearest analyst,
jpadron

---------------------- Forwarded by Juan Padron/NA/Enron on 04/17/2001 05:28
AM ---------------------------
From: Karen Buckley/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/10/2001 09:41 AM
To: Russell Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Gim/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan
Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Schiavone/ENRON@enronXgate, Joseph
Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Chuck Ames/NA/Enron@Enron, Bilal Bajwa/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth
Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matt Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Virawan Yawapongsiri/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Trading Track - Training Session

All,

John Lavorato has requested your attendance every other Wednesday as listed
below.      Each desk head will give an approx 1.5 presentation on their
respective areas.      Please mark the below in your calendars.       If at
any time there is a change in the presenter I will notify you.

If you have any questions please let me know.

Rgds,

Karen
x54667

Room:  32C2
Time:  4 - 6 pm.

Wednesday, April 18th  Allen, Philip
Wednesday, May 2nd  Arnold, John
Wednesday, May 16th  Davis, Dana
Wednesday, May 30th  Gilbert-Smith, Doug
Wednesday, June 13th  Grigsby, Mike
Wednesday, June 27th  Martin, Thomas
Wednesday, July 11th  Neal, Scott
Wednesday, July 25th  Presto, Kevin
Wednesday, Aug 8th  Herndon, Rogers
Wednesday, Aug 22nd  Schwieger, Jim
Wednesday, Sept 5th  Shively, Hunter
Wednesday, Sept 19th  Sturm, Fletcher


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000
07:24 AM ---------------------------

"Jason Dobbs" <jmjaked@mindspring.com> on 06/14/2000 12:27:14 AM
To: "tyson davis" <zeked@mindspring.com>, "tony autry"
<bones@pepperlink.net>, "phil love--work" <plove@enron.com>, "louis bowen"
<bowenx2@pepperlink.net>, "Jim Wood" <jwood@regionsbank.com>, "Caleb"
<dobbsmw@mail.auburn.edu>, "Boo Boo" <Shane.Dobbs@fctg.com>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Good Golf Joke

----- Original Message -----
From: F. E. Bori <frank4au@alltel.net>
To: Scott <saperkin@nscorp.com>; Mark <mpeeler@totalsystem.com>; KMcfarlin
<kmcfarlin@xomed.com>; Melanie <jmjaked@mindspring.com>; procter
<procter@gateway.net>; Roger Work <RBori@sparton.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 7:23 PM
Subject: Fw: Good Golf Joke

>
> >
> > > >It was a sunny Saturday morning on the course and I was beginning my
> > > >
> > > >pre-shot routine, visualizing my upcoming shot, when a voice came
over
> > > >
> > > >the clubhouse loudspeaker.
> > > >
> > > >"Would the gentleman on the woman's tee back up to the men's tee
> > > >
> > > >please!!" I was still deep in my routine, seemingly impervious to the
> > > >
> > > >interruption.
> > > >
> > > >       Again the announcement,
> > > >
> > > >"Would the MAN on the WOMEN'S tee kindly back up to the men's tee." I
> > > >
> > > >simply ignored the guy and kept concentrating, when once more, the
man
> > > >
> > > >yelled: "Would the man on the woman's tee back up to the men's tee,
> > > >
> > > >PLEASE!"
> > > >
> > > >I finally stopped, turned, looked through the clubhouse window
directly
> > > >
> > > >at the person with the mike and shouted back, "Would the person in
the
> > > >
> > > >clubhouse kindly shut the fuck up and let me play my second shot?"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   _____
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Happy July 4th !!!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Please visit our web site.  [http://www.dunavant.com]
> > > >
> > >
>**********************************************************************
> > > >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > > >intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> > > >are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> > > >the sender.
> > >
>**********************************************************************
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
________________________________________________________________________
> > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>


Hey Danny,

Here is a prospective roster for Flag Football.  All are Enron employees.

Eric Bass
Brian Hoskins
Tim Blanchard
Matt Lenhart
Luis Mena
Jeff Gossett
Ken Shulklapper
Amir Ahanchian
Nick Hiemstra

Can you tell us what night the games will be on?

When do you need the due?

Thanks,

Eric
x3-0977


The deals have been moved to ENA-FT-WT-SOCAL and retranslated successfully.

Cecilia

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 8:55 AM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	Additional Book to Move

Cecilia,
In addition to moving the deals detailed in my previous email, please move only financial deals with the same counterparties from NG-PR-OPT to ENA-WT-SOCAL.  I realize it's a big list, but how long will the entire process take?  If you have any questions, please let me know.  Thanks.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Giron, Darron C.
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 3:56 PM
To:	Cheung, Cecilia
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	More Counterparties

Attached is a long list of counterparty names to move from NG-PRICE into ENA-WT-SOCAL.  Please move only financial deals only.  Please let me know when this is complete.  Thanks.

DG

 << File: PositiveMTMCounterparties.xls >>


Hello everyone:

Just when you get used to something it changes!

As you may have heard, Enron is implementing a new time entry system as part
of the July 1 SAP implementation.  Time entry for the June 16th- 30th period
must be entered into SAP by 3:00 pm CST on June 30th.  As your Timekeeper, I
will assist with this process and ensure that we meet this very important
deadline.

I will continue to do the time sheets for the 19th floor and for Osman and
Samer.

Sam Smith and/or Kevin Moore will be responsible for the timesheets for the
weather group on the 32nd Floor.

Time can be entered in SAP in two ways:
? you can enter your time yourself using the new eHRonline feature; or,
? timekeepers can enter time on your behalf.

If you are unsure as to which approach you should use, please call me.
Please remember that all time for this period must be submitted before 3:00
pm CST, on June 30th.

For those of you using eHRonline:
First of all, congratulations on taking this next step toward Enron,s vision
of empowering the employee.  By using the new eHRonline feature, you are
helping Enron to realize the value in this SAP implementation.  Hopefully,
you too, will receive value from having instant access to your personal
information.

The new eHRonline functionality is:
? easy to use
? accessible through the Enron intranet at eHRonline.enron.com

Using this feature, you can not only enter your own time, but also maintain:
? your profile information (skills, education, and experience)
? home address
? phone numbers
? W-4 changes
? emergency contact information

Additionally, you will be able to view your individual pay advice and benefit
elections.

You will receive your personal ID and password via e-mail from SAP_Security
by June 22nd.  Because of the confidentiality of the information accessible
using eHRonline, it is important that you keep your ID and password
confidential.  If you do not receive your information by the end of the day
on June 22nd, please call the COE at (713) 345-4SAP to obtain your ID and
password.

The Apollo & Beyond team has teamed with EBS to deliver training on how to
enter time using eHRonline via EBS, new product EnronCast.  This tool is
available to you on your desktop.  You can access EnronCast at
www.enroncast.com and follow the instructions.

STEP BY STEP GUIDES - http://sap.enron.com/coe
? ENTER TIME VIA EHRONLINE (EMPLOYEE) STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE
? CORRECT TIME VIA EHRONLINE (EMPLOYEE) STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE
? ENTER TIME VIA EHRONLINE (NON-EMPLOYEE CONTRACTOR) STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE
? CORRECT TIME VIA EHRONLINE (NON-EMPLOYEE CONTRACTOR) STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE]

For those of you who need me to enter your time:
Attached is a manual time entry form that I must have completed and returned
by June 28th.  Please estimate the last two days of the period as accurately
as possible.  If necessary, I can make corrections on the next time entry
period.  If you do not want to use this form, I will have hard copies at my
desk and will be glad to help you fill them
out.  I know this is creating more work for everyone, but what can I say?

Where can you get help?
I am here to help you with the new coding necessary on your timesheet.  Also,
if you do not know which Absence or Attendance Type you should use, please
come see me or give me a call.

If you have other questions or are experiencing problems, you can also get
help from any of the following places:

Center of Expertise (COE)
The Center of Expertise can help answer many of your questions and provide
you with assistance if you are experiencing problems.  The COE is available
24 hours a day from Monday at 7:00 am CST through Friday at 7:00 pm CST.  You
can contact the COE at (713) 345-4SAP.

Dedicated Support Personnel
During the time period right after the initial &go live8 the project team has
dedicated additional resources to help support you.  These resources can be
contacted at:

Marla Hernandez at x 39763 for now and after 6/22 at x31645 at workstation #
EB3661B
Mark Timmons at 57919 for now, pager number 888-620-3896, at workstation #
EB3667A

Regards,

Shirley
3-5290


Diane, I've left a message for Brian Bloom about this -- would you please follow up, as he either didn't get my message or has not returned my call.  Basically, we did an incentive plan for Enron Investment Partners, and now we want to dissolve it.  Would you ask him to provide a brief overview via email as to what it would entail?  Thanks.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walton, Sheila
Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 6:42 PM
To:	Knudsen, Sheila A.
Cc:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	RE: Incentive Plan

I was going to ask Michelle Cash to take a look at it to see if we could dissolve it.  Pam Butler does not want Garland to know we had a carried interest plan.

Michelle, since you initially were involved, can we quietly dissolve this plan since EIP is no more??  Please advise. Thanks.

Sheila  Walton

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Knudsen, Sheila A.
Sent:	Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:38 PM
To:	Walton, Sheila
Subject:	Incentive Plan

Sheila - with the merging of EIP into Enron Principal Investments we need to discuss what happens with the incentive plan we developed for them last year.

Sheila


Call me at Mom and Dad's on Saturday and I'll pop down and see you at work.

Chris


Here is a draft of the memo to send to the IT guys.  Let me know your
thoughts.

P.S. -- the list of names is just a partial list.  Richard is tracking down
some additional people to add.  We will have that, I hope, later today.