Roman,

Sorry. I am leaving for Philadelphia this evening. Leaving office around 5
p.m. Let's get together on another occasion.

Vince

Roman Kosecki <rkosecki@mieco.com> on 10/18/2000 02:09:28 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com '" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

 Hi Vince,
   I am in Houston now. Will have to work late . But how about drinks/food
some time around 7-8 or later ?  I am staying at Wyndham Greenplace (?) and
will use taxi to get around.
  Thanks
Roman

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
To: rkosecki@mieco.com
Sent: 10/13/00 7:55 AM
Subject: RE:

Roman

Thanks.

My home number is 281 367 5377

Vince

Roman Kosecki <rkosecki@mieco.com> on 10/13/2000 09:38:39 AM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE:

I will be in Houston on Wed. Willl give you a call
Roman

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 2:43 PM
To: rkosecki@mieco.com
Subject: Re:

Roman,

Drinks after work would be better. I am flying back from Ca on Tue
morning.
Please, call me at 713 853 3848 or 713 410 5396 (cell)
in the afternoon.

Vince

Roman Kosecki <rkosecki@mieco.com> on 10/12/2000 12:21:50 PM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Hi Vince
   I will be in Houston for a few days next week ( like mon-wed). If you
are
back from your European trips maybe we can "do" lunch ?
   Roman


Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 06:00 PM -----

	Robert Bruce@ENRON
	Sent by: Robert Bruce@ENRON
	01/16/2001 04:15 PM

		 To: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Commodity Exchange Act, as revised by CFMA

Enclosed is a version of the Commodity Exchange Act, redlined to show how it
has been revised by the CFMA.  This document was e-mailed to me earlier today
by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft.

Chris, the language in the "Definitions" sections (Section 1a) is what
concerns us most.

A new definition has been added -- "EXEMPT COMMODITY" which is (14) of Sec.
1a (not to be confused w/ "EXCLUDED COMMODITY," which is (13) of Sec 1a.).
The new "scheme" is as follows -- an "excluded" commodity (essentially,
financials and weather) is the most deregulated, an "exempt" commodity is
almost but not quite as deregulated, and agricultural commodities are still
subject to full jurisdiction of the CFTC and the Commodity Exchange Act.

As you can see, the definition of "Exempt Commodity" is simply stated as
everything other than an excluded commodity or agricultural commodity.  The
ambiguity is that "agricultural commodity" is not defined, so the question is
-- is the reference to "agricultural commodity" here meant to encompass
coffee, sugar and cocoa as well as grains and meats?

FYI, the list of "enumerated" agricultural commodities is in (4) of Sec 1a,
in the old definition of "COMMODITY," which remains in the Act.  Usually,
when regulators wish to reference the restricted list of grains and meats, it
is this section they refer to.  In fact, Congress referred expressly to this
list in other places in the CFMA.  For example, see the new Section 4p(c)(1)
(which is on page 59 of the attached document).

Please feel free to call me w/ any comments or questions.  Thanks -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com


YIPPEEE.

I'm about to fall face down in my computer.  I'm not as young as I used to be.

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 04/26/2001 02:24:57 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann \(E-mail\)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: quillian center

They have appox 100 spaces open for each session. I have all the necessary
paperwork. It looks great and it looks very new. The kids I saw all looked
happy...NM


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 08/29/2000
08:31 AM ---------------------------

Calvin Burrell <cbburrell@juno.com> on 08/25/2000 08:04:03 PM
To: SUHERNAN@LLGM.COM, Lea.Savala@enron.com, mbuns54@yahoo.com,
dna_1993@yahoo.com, Judy.Hernandez@enron.com, marychesney@juno.com,
krussell@nw15.esrd.net, ricjew@intellex.com, sthompson47@hotmail.com,
padams@shianet
cc:
Subject: Fw: 1 Minute Prayer

HI,
Happy Sabbath!!!  May you be very blessed.
Barb

> The One Minute Prayer
>

>Father, I ask you to bless my friends reading this right now.  I am
> asking
> You to minister to their spirit at this very moment.   Where there is
> pain,
> give them Your peace and mercy.  Where there is self doubting, release
a
> renewed confidence in Your ability to work through them.  Where there
is
> tiredness, or exhaustion, I ask You to give them understanding,
guidance,
>
> and strength as they learn submission to Your leading.  Where there is
> spiritual stagnation, I ask You to renew them by revealing Your
nearness,
>
> and by drawing them into greater intimacy with You.  Where there is
fear,
>
> reveal Your love, and release to them Your courage.  Where there is a
sin
>
> blocking them, reveal it, and break its hold over my friend's life.
> Bless
> their finances, give them greater vision, and raise up leaders and
> friends
> to support and encourage them.  Give each of them discernment to
> recognize
> the evil forces around them, and reveal to them the power they have in
> You
> to defeat it.
>
> I ask You to do these things in Jesus' name.
>
> In Love, Your Friend
>
> P.S.  Passing this on to a friend will bless you both.


With deep regret we announce that Joe Sutton, Vice Chairman of Enron, has
decided to leave the company.  Joe has indicated his desire to pursue other
opportunities in the energy asset development and operations business.

Joe has been instrumental in making Enron a global company.  We will miss his
energy and enthusiasm.  We wish Joe the very best as he pursues new endeavors.

Ken and Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
[mailto:enron_update@concureworkplace.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 4:08 AM
To: Steven Kean
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - SK092001

The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  System
Expense Report Name: SK092001
Report Total: $12,006.59
Amount Due Employee: $12,006.59
Amount Approved: $12,006.59
Amount Paid: $12,006.59
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Paid

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Barabara,

I had a lunch today with Rob Ladd from Duke (company, not university).
He is a Rice graduate and I mentioned to him the seminars that Enron was sponsoring.
He is willing to talk to you about substituting Duke for Enron as a sponsor of the
seminar program.

Please, contact him at rtladd@duke-capitalpartners.com.
His cell phone number is 704 756 5354.

I am working on the power price time series for you but I may run out of time.

Vince


Isn't this awesome. I don't know how they did that. I'm impress.
----- Forwarded by Charlotte Banks/Enron Communications on 11/30/00 09:14 AM
-----

	Darlene C Forsyth@ECT
	11/29/00 02:14 PM

		 To: Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: (bcc: Charlotte Banks/Enron Communications)
		 Subject: Sand Pictures!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000
02:10 PM ---------------------------
To: Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maricela Chavez/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth
Dean/HOU/EES@EES, Todd5@duplinnet.com
cc:
Subject: Sand Pictures!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Debbie Lucadou/HOU/EES on 11/29/2000
01:51 PM ---------------------------
From: Irma Fuentes@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 11/29/2000 01:47 PM
To: Debbie Lucadou/HOU/EES@EES, Rose
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Frances
Garcia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Sand Pictures!!!

----- Forwarded by Irma Fuentes/Enron Communications on 11/29/00 01:47 PM
-----

	RichardF@publicans.com
	11/29/00 01:30 PM

		 To: jdavidlopez@ev1.net, Irma Fuentes/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, JackieH@publicans.com, JudithG@publicans.com,
angelac@publicans.com, marisal@wetmore-printing.com,
melissafuentes1@juno.com, scopyskit1@aol.com, Monica.Diaz@publicans.com,
Neo_69_00@hotmail.com, dncortiz@hotmail.com, rosies@publicans.com,
Sgallegos@boysandgirlsharbor.org, Stephanie.Bazaldua@publicans.com,
SFierro@publicans.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Sand Pictures!!!

>    <<JESUS 2.jpg>>  <<JESUS.jpg>>  <<Last Supper.jpg>>


that is good


Fiona,
?
Please find attached a brochure for the advertisement of the  book.? It's
similar to the other material we sent, so I'm assuming it will  need the same
modifications.? Please pass along all the modifications as  soon as
possible.? Receiving the changes from Enron is the?only thing  holding up the
printing of the book.? Please let us know if there is  anything that you need
from us.
?
Sincerely,
?
Julie
?
Lacima Group
 - LRES ENERG DER A4 FLYER 2.pdf


Brian,

I didn't get the revised draft.

Kay

From: Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/07/2001 04:43 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: BlueDog Change Order #2, Rev 6

Kay:  I have edited the draft you sent me and placed GE's comments in a
different color so you can see their comments next to yours.  Risk Management
(Paul Parrish) is OK with the 100% coverage.  The original deal was that they
would be off the hook for cosmetic damage incurred by GE's storage, so to put
them back on the hook was a bit of a retrade.  Otherwise I think their
comments (other than the approval of the assignment comment) are in order.

Is this draft acceptable to you?

BB
----- Forwarded by Brian D Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/07/2001 04:37 PM
-----

	jeffrey.darst@ps.ge.com
	02/07/2001 02:20 PM

		 To: bbarto@enron.com
		 cc: chasecl@pssch.ps.ge.com
		 Subject: BlueDog Change Order #2, Rev 5

Brian,

The following are our comments to the subject change order.  If you like, we
can set up a time to discuss these comments.  As I mentioned on the phone,
many of the comments directed at Part 1, Item 1 are due to the fact I do not
have a signed copy of Consent to Assignment.  I am searching for a copy at
this end, but if you have ready access, a copy would be appreciated.

Part I

1.  The base contract defines the party GE is contracting with as the
"Purchaser".  LJM2is the Purchaser under the base contract. I understand
assignment of the contract by LJM2 to E-Next is under consideration and was
supposed to have occurred in December. I do not have a copy of the Consent
signed by GE or any other signed documents indicating that the assignment
has taken place.  Assuming the assignment has taken place, according to the
unsigned documentation I have, Enron North America Corp. should be replaced
as the contracting party in paragraph 1 by E-Next Generation LLC as the
party that is contracting with GE and is the Purchaser.   As I understand
the draft Consent agreement, Enron North America is supposed to be the Agent
for E-Next and is not the Purchaser.  This is consistent with the cover page
of the draft CO No. 2.

Revision 5 to the Change Order does not quite succeed in making the
correction.  It should say "... between General Electric Company ("Seller")
and E-Next Generation LLC ("Purchaser") dated May 31, 2000 (the
"Agreement"), Purchaser, acting through its Agent, Enron North America
Corp., hereby amends ...".  However, CO No. 2 with this correction to
paragraph 1 should not be signed by GE until GE has agreed to the assignment
to E-Next.  Otherwise, the signed CO. No. 2 could, by itself, be construed
as consent by GE to the assignment.

2.1  Delete the added language that begins with the words "on or prior to
the Guaranteed Unit Shipment Date(s)...".  Because Unit No. 1 is going to
storage and the customer controls when it is released from storage and when
it gets to the jobsite, the risk of late delivery originally assigned by the
contract to GE has shifted to the customer.  This is recognized in section
5.5.2 of the contract which states that if GE is directed to ship to
storage, for the purpose of assessing LDs and final payment, GE's delivery
obligation is deemed fulfilled.  The original guaranteed delivery dates are
no longer relevant. If the Unit 1 equipment is close enough to being ready
for delivery that it must be shipped to storage because the customer cannot
take possession of it, it does not matter if we ship to storage before or
after the contract delivery dates.

2.2  The comment to 2.1 applies to this paragraph also.  Further, there is
no guaranteed delivery date for non-Major Components as long as delivery of
that equipment does not impede the continuous progress of installation.

2.4  Delete the words "unless caused by Seller or its Subcontractor" at the
end of this paragraph. Otherwise, the paragraph first takes a responsibility
away from GE and then re-imposes it.  As I understand it, there is a
significant possibility that some cosmetic deterioration to external
surfaces will occur to the equipment while it is in storage.  This is a
function of the storage conditions and GE is responsible for those
conditions.

2.6  Delete in its entirety the second sentence which reads "Passage of
title and warranty obligations of Seller with respect to the Unit 1
Equipment remain unchanged under the Agreement".  Article 5.5.2 makes it
clear that Purchaser's direction to place equipment into storage causes
title to pass and delivery for the purposes of LDs and final payment to
occur even though Purchaser has not taken physical possession of the stored
equipment.  5.5.2 also indicates that all expenses incurred by Seller as the
result of placing equipment into storage shall be payable by Purchaser.
These expenses include any extension of the Primary Warranty Period that
results from storage.  The deleted sentence should be replaced by: "The
parties agree that the Primary Warranty Period for Unit 1 Equipment placed
into storage shall be determined in accordance with Article 14.1.1 of the
Agreement except that the Primary Warranty Period shall end for the gas
turbine and generator no later than March 11, 2004 and for the balance of
the Unit 1 Equipment on March 31, 2004 unless extended by mutual agreement."

2.10  We will insure the equipment to 100% of its purchase price.  The
policy in place will have a $300,000 deductible, for which GE will be
responsible.

2.11  Seller's responsibility for both damage and loss, not just loss,
should pass to Purchaser.

The rest of the changes are acceptable.

Regards,

Jeff


Mark,  Please review the attached form of amendments.  I have also prepared
the form of amendment for the O&M Agreements, but will hold until you get
further information on the fee arrangements.

After you review these forms, lets discuss and review where we are at in this
whole process.  We will need to get TW, Accounting, and Investor review of
these as soon as possible.


Just wanted to say Hi, I know  you are at work but had to share something.
About two weeks ago, we had to go to dinner at the Peabody with some business
people in town and Jeff introduced me to someone named Cam Smith.  Jeff had
told me he was from Cleveland, MS and his dad was Dr. Smith, OK I put it
together it was Bruce Orman's nephew,  Ok I feel really old NOW!!   He is
young starting out with this particular company that sells to Jeff.  Anyway,
he remembered you and said he always liked you so much.  He gave me scoop on
Bruce and Nancy about moving to Oxford, etc.  He was really nice and quite
country talking but he is married and lives somewhere north of Memphis in Tn.
    What a small world.   Just think you could be living in Oxford town with
that Postmaster!! H A! Just kidding, I would love to see you soon.  Maybe I
can visit you one day.   CT


print this and i need a folder titled ARA Coal Summary
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000
12:09 PM ---------------------------

Jez Peters
09/30/2000 09:41 AM
To: Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Samuel Grossman/LON/ECT@ECT, Pierre Aury/LON/ECT@ECT,
Chris Connelly/LON/ECT@ECT, Riaz Rizvi/LON/ECT@ECT, Manfred
Ungethum/LON/ECT@ECT, Sven Becker/FRA/ECT@ECT, John Moran/LON/ECT@ECT,
Cornelia Luptowitsch/LON/ECT@ECT, Scott Longmore/LON/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Cochran/LON/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth McCarthy/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Kearney/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephen Pirozzi/LON/ECT@ECT, Dimitri Taylor/LON/ECT@ECT, Kenny
Nicoll/LON/ECT@ECT, Lisa Kent/LON/ECT@ECT, Candace Parker/LON/ECT@ECT, Harry
Papadopoulos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Bowman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Paul Mead/LON/ECT@ECT, Karolina Potter/LON/ECT@ECT, Meindert
Witteveen/LON/ECT@ECT, Louis Redshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Niamh Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: ARA Coal Mkt Summary

MKT SUMMARY

  Dust is settling after latest supply side incident to hit the market -
namely the Drummond Force Majeure. What remains now is cif mkt
   which is in backwardisation for Q4 and Q1 01 versus the rest of 2001 but
where stocks in Rotterdam are at near record highs at around
   2.5 million mt for the end of September. Indeed, utilities and traders
alike have taken advantage of the weak spot mkt we experienced
   during August and early September to buy up distressed parcels in ARA and
play the cash / carry game. This has certainly paid
   dividends as any slack which was in the pipeline has certainly been
swallowed due to a number of incidents which has restricted
   production/shipments from various geographies. While the whole curve has
shifted north as a result of early buying interest for 2001
   the backwardisation in the frt curves coupled with above has seen Q4 and
Q1 prices increase by some $4 over past 6 weeks to
   absolute values at $39 cif ARA - this represents a prm of between
$0.75-$1.00 over Jan/Dec 01 run. Believe the front end will continue
   to remain tight due to supply squeeze we are feeling and high frt rates
but going forward into next year we may see some price pressure
   from levels we are today as a consequence of lower frt rates, increase in
prod'n, synfuel into Europe and weaker continental power prices
   from the high levels they are today. Control of FOB origin prices through
continued consolidation in the production side of the industry
   could put ruin to this and hence we look for opportunities to spread our
long FOB origin posn into as many geographies as possible.

SPOT TRADES

Bot one pnmx of Caypa Steam coal from Masefield for December shipment FOB
Santa Marta at $US 31 basis 11800btu.
Sold 70mmt of chinese material to EVN delivered stockpile for October and
November delivery at what is the equivalent of $41
fob barge Rotterdam basis 6000 kcal/kg
Switched 20mmt Australian Steam Coal Fob barge Rotterdam with Electrabel for
20mmt of Colombian Steamcoal at agreed
differential.
Bot physical put option from TXU (still to be finalised) for Cape quantity
for Q1 delivery with a $40 strike price basis Rotterdam
and $40.40 basis Hunterston at $0.75 cent premium with exercise date of 30th
November.
Sold 2 x 15mmt SECA contracts to Glencore for December delivery at $40 Fob
barge and $40.50 fob barge respectively.

SELLING SIDE

Mission continue to look for La Loma material for December delivery - now
looking at 2 pnmx 1 into east coast and 1 into hunterston.
Bewag have tender out for 500mmt for 2001
Rheinbraun/Duisbourg combined looking for close to 250mmt Colombian material
on delivered basis.
Working with Electrabel to offer them 50mmt a month for 2001
Veag looking for 300mmt cif Rostock for Nov 00/June 01.
EDFT after tonnage for Q4 and a cape a month Q101.
Endesa - 4 capes for 2001.
Fenosa - looking for 250mmt of low vol U.S material split across 2001.
HdelC entertaining swap of Russian material for U.S coal during 2001
Billiton looking for small parcel of Colombian material in ARA.

BUYING SIDE

Emerald - still looking to buy high Sulphur material from U.S to execute
Preussen deal. 3 firm pnmx plus 3 options.
Masefield - offered further pnmx cargo of 11800 material for Q1 delivery at
$32 FOB Santa Marta.
BBC Trading - 10-15mmt Russian material ex-stockpile Sczcecin to supply our
bewag commitments.
Putting final touches to purchasing South African Material FOB RBCT for 200.
Likely to be a cape quantity for Q2 delivery.
AES - UK coal for Q4 and Q1 2001.
BHP - 1 June 2001 Cape.

EOL

We are just shy of reaching 500,000mt mark for total volume of tonnage traded
via EOL with the activity that went on this week. There
continues to be excellent interest from all sectors of the industry and we
really need to focus on converting the increasing number
of guest user ID's we are giving out into actual transactions on the system -
many are still afraid of the technology, many are still ignorant
of how they can utilise the system as a risk management tool and many simply
don't have the authority - hence we continue to focus
on preaching the word to all and sundry!! Highlight this week was having
Glencore trade on two occasions and not surprisingly they were
propping the mkt up on the buy side. We are moving ahead with posting options
on the SECA contract on EOL.

GAMEPLAN

Current mkt environment has generated healthy buying interest for 2001 and
with the expectation that we will still see frt rates ease off for 2001
from the high levels today ($9.50 RBCT - ARA Cape) combined with a somewhat
weaker tone in continental power prices for 01 we are fairly
keen to hit some of this business at current price levels. We have benefited
from the current price hike maintaining an overall long position
but with the lions share of that long being placed in Drummond we must focus
on securing physical commitments from Drummond for first half 01
shipments in order to participate in any of this business with peace of mind.
Hence we continue to look for opportunities to tie up tonnage from
other geographies such as South Africa, Australia, U.S and Russia that will
allow us the flexibility which adds so much value to our book.

Have extended dlist this week - if you donot wish to receive then please let
me know and likewise if you would like people
added.

Best Regards
Jez


Your approval is needed for the following new product type in Datamanager.
Please see the steps for approval below.

US East Power Phy Fwd Firm Unplan B EES (EES ONLY) (product type description)

US Pwr Unp B EES     (short description as it will appear on the Website)

A US Power Transaction with Enron Power Marketing, Inc. under which the
Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall purchase a quantity of Unplanned B
energy as defined in Section E of Operating Guide No 1 - System Control  of
the most recent version of the Operating Guides of the Electric Reliability
Council of Texas, Inc. ("ERCOT") equal to the Hourly Quantity at the Contract
Price.  The Contract Price shall be as submitted by the Counterparty via the
Website.
The transaction is for the applicable hours as set forth herein on each
Delivery Day for the Effective Date 01 Jun 2001 to the Termination Date 30
Jun 2001.
The transaction is for delivery or receipt of energy within ERCOT that is
"Undelivered" in accordance with the most recent version of the ERCOT Market
Guides.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours
(MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable
hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').
The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning
with the hour ending 0700 (6:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2200
(10:00 pm) Central Prevailing Time. "Delivery Day" means a day during the
term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or
Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000
07:45 AM ---------------------------
From: Mark Palmer on 11/15/2000 08:57 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE

----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 11/15/2000 08:57 AM -----

	Margaret Allen
	11/15/2000 08:53 AM

		 To: mpalmer@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE

Mark,  you must read this!  Very funny!

...from one of my limey friends....:)

>
>
>
> NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE
> To the citizens of the United States of America,
> In the light of your failure to elect a President of the USA and thus to
> govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your
> independence, effective today.
> Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties
> over all states, commonwealths and other territories.  Except Utah, which
> she does not fancy.  Your new prime minister (The rt. hon. Tony Blair, MP
> for the 97.85% of you who have until now been unaware that there is a
> world outside your borders) will appoint a minister for America without
> the need for further elections.  Congress and the Senate will be
> disbanded.  A questionnaire will be circulated next year to determine
> whether any of you noticed.
> To aid in the transition to a British Crown Dependency, the following
> rules are introduced with immediate effect:
> 1. You should look up "revocation" in the Oxford English Dictionary.
> Then look up "aluminium".  Check the pronunciation guide.  You will be
> amazed at just how wrong you have been pronouncing it.  Generally, you
> should raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels.  Look up "vocabulary".
> Using the same twenty seven words  interspersed with filler noises such as
> "like" and "you know" is an unacceptable and inefficient form of
> communication.  Look up "interspersed".
> 2. There is no such thing as "US English".  We will let Microsoft know
> on your behalf.
> 3. You should learn to distinguish the English and Australian accents.
> It
> really isn't that hard.
>
> 4. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as
> the good guys.
> 5. You should relearn your original national anthem, "God Save The
> Queen", but only after fully carrying out task 1.  We would not want you
> to get confused and give up half way through.
> 6. You should stop playing American "football".  There is only one kind
> of football.  What you refer to as American "football" is not a very good
> game.
> The 2.15% of you who are aware that there is a world outside your borders
> may have noticed that no one else plays  "American" football.  You will no
> longer be allowed to play it, and should instead play proper football.
> Initially, it would be best if you played with the girls.  It is a
> difficult game.  Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to
> play rugby (which is similar to American "football", but does not involve
> stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body
> armour like nancies).  We are hoping to get together at least a US rugby
> sevens side by 2005.
> 7. You should declare war on Quebec and France, using nuclear weapons
> if they give you any merde.  The 98.85% of you who were not aware that
> there is a world outside your borders should count yourselves lucky.  The
> Russians have never been the bad guys.  "Merde" is French for "sh*t".
> 8. July 4th is no longer a public holiday.  November 8th will be a new
> national holiday, but only in England.  It will be called "Indecisive
> Day".
> 9. All American cars are hereby banned.  They are crap and it is for
> your own good.  When we show you German cars, you will understand what we
> mean.
> 10. Please tell us who killed JFK.  It's been driving us crazy.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation.
>

This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended
solely for the addressee(s) and are confidential and may be legally
privileged.  Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express
prior written permission of the sender.  If you have received this e-mail in
error you may not copy, disclose to any third party or use the contents,
attachments or information in any way.  Please destroy it and contact the
sender via the Thomson Financial switchboard on (44) 207 369 7000 or via
e-mail return.  Internet communications are not secure unless protected using
strong cryptography.  This e-mail has been prepared using information
believed by the author to be reliable and accurate, but Thomson Financial
does not accept responsibility for the timeliness, accuracy or completeness
of the information provided or for any changes to this e-mail, howsoever
made, after it was sent.  [The content of this e-mail and files transmitted
with it is  (c) TFSL - 2000]


All,

When we convert Unify to Sybase 12.0, all passwords will get reset to
"houston".  Once you login to Unify you will have to change you password.
This is an unavoidable side affect of migrating to Sybase 12.0.

Thanks,
Chris


Vasant,

Thanks. See you  on Saturday.

Vince

Vasant Shanbhogue <vshanbh@yahoo.com> on 11/29/2000 09:49:16 PM
To: massong@epenergy.com, vkamins@enron.com, sgibner@enron.com,
pkrishn@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Reminder for dinner on Saturday Dec 2nd

This is to remind all of you of the dinner plan (with
family) at my house on Saturday Dec 2nd.  We will
expect you at about 6:00 pm.

Address:  3410 S. Briarpark Ln, Sugar Land

Directions (from downtown) :

Take 59 South all the way past Sam Houston Beltway 8,
and past Highway 6.  Take the next exit --- First
Colony Blvd/Sweetwater Blvd.  Take a left at the
traffic light onto Sweetwater Blvd (over the highway).
 Go straight on Sweetwater Blvd past a few traffic
lights and a few stop signs.  After passing a golf
course on the right, you will get a subdivision
"Crescents on the Green" on the right, and a
subdivision "BriarWood" on the left.  Take a Left into
the Briarwood subdivision and an immediate right onto
S. Briarpark Ln. (There is only one street in the
subdivision).  Our house (3410)is right there --- 3rd
house from cul-de-sec.
Phone : 281 265 8959
Cell : 713 569 2438

Vasant

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/


Laurel:

Jason is ready to send comments on this agreement requested by John Greene.
Can you please provide Jason with the name, address, fax number of the party
with whom we should be communicating in order to negotiate this agreement.
If you need to speak with Jason, you can call him at (713) 220-4124.

Thanks.  Sara


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW0080  OCT 22,2001       3:32 PACIFIC      06:32 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) From Russia With South African and
Australian Associates, in an Advisory by Industrialinfo.com

	   Business Editors

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 22, 2001--The following is an
advisory by Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources,
Inc., Houston, Texas). Norilsk, the Russian nickel mining corporation,
is taking its first step out of the home territories of the former
Soviet Union with its participation in the Nakety nickel project in
New Caledonia. The project is at present estimated to be worth in
excess of $500 million. Assisting in the generation of the project,
which was initiated by the Australian/Canadian company Argosy, is the
South African project development and process engineering group
Bateman Project Holdings who have worked with both of the other
project associates on previous ventures.
	   The relationship with Norilsk could grow for Bateman as the
Russians are said to be interested in base metal projects in Africa
and South Africa. The South African company has developed technologies
and management and marketing techniques to apply to the commercial
exploitation of a range of raw mineral mining projects in developing
countries. It is currently completing a $160 million gas compressor
plant in Turkmenistan, which is being followed by a similar plant in
Uzbekistan. Phosphates projects in the Middle East and Peru are also
under consideration. In Africa, it has the Skorpion zinc-mine
concentrator, refinery and smelter in Namibia, the SA Chrome project
in South Africa and diamond, cobalt and copper projects in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo as well as the Corridor Sands project
in Mozambique.
	   Industrialinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including industry alerts and databases for the energy
and industrial markets. For more information on trends and upcoming
construction activities for the Metals & Minerals industry as well as
other industrial sectors send inquiries to
metalsandmineralsgroup@industrialinfo.com or visit us at
www.industrialinfo.com.

    --30--AC/na*

    CONTACT: Industrial Information Resources, Inc.
             Joseph Govreau, 713/783-5147
             www.industrialinfo.com

    KEYWORD: TEXAS RUSSIA SOUTH AFRICA AUSTRALIA TURKMENISTAN
UZBEKISTAN CONGO MOZAMBIQUE NAMIBIA PERU INTERNATIONAL ASIA PACIFIC
EUROPE CANADA AFRICA/MIDDLE EAST LATIN AMERICA
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: MINING/METALS
    SOURCE: Industrial Information Resources, Inc.

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


Steve at TCO's Gas Control approved the 32,000 overinjection.

Total STOI Delivery for May 2nd is 80,000.

Thanks.


Good morning Stan.  I am holding 11:00 - Noon on Wednesday for the building
tour.  I think it would be okay to meet Jeff and Bill Donovan in the lobby.
Unfortunately Jeff will be leaving to go out of town right after lunch, so I
don't think that the tour of the Hobby Performing Arts Center will work for
Wednesday.

Thanks and have a great weekend.

Joannie

stanmarek@marekbros.com on 05/04/2001 09:22:05 AM
To: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re: Follow-Up - Brent Larsen

Joannie,

Just a reminder about the job tour on Wednesday.  I will be in San Diego
until Tuesday night so I wanted to check in today.  I will be happy to come
to Jeff's office to pick him up or we can meet in the lobby. Just give me a
time and I'll set it up.  I will also be available to show him the Hobby
Performing Arts Center if he has time.

-Stan


To all:

Attached for your review and comment are forms of the initial notice letter,
assignment and assumption agreement and bill of sale that we intend to
deliver this Friday for a closing the next Friday on April 27.  In addition,
please note that Rose and I are still coordinating the preparation of the
Prepayment Notice as well as the UCC-3s.  Please call or email me with any
comments or questions that you may have and thank you in advance for your
attention to this matter.

Carlos Sole'
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002-7361

(713) 345-8191 (phone)
713 646-3393 (fax)


Please change the start date to May the 14th


ok call me on my cell later.  i think that we are going to go shopping and then we will meet you somewhere to drink.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:20 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i guess so

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:18 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i think that we are going to go workout and then we can all go somewhere.  is that ok?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:14 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

dinking, i will meet you around 2:30

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:14 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

that's not acceptable.  come play now.  ok so where can laura and i go?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:13 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i have to go back into lavo's office in a few minutes, then i have to go to lunch with john and one of our research guys from chicago, i will be back around 1:30

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:07 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

come down here and visit me


Hi, Sara.

Brent said that you told him you gave me a copy of the Credit Review Sheet (or Credit Worksheet).  I haven't seen one from you.  Did you give it to someone else to forward to him?

Signed,
"Confused at Enron"

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Tuesday, March 05, 2002 9:54 AM
To:	Spencer, Becky
Subject:	RE: Form

Credit.  Tom Moran, Veronica Gonzales or Bjorn Hagelmann.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Spencer, Becky
Sent:	Tuesday, March 05, 2002 7:33 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Form

Sara,

I talked with Brent Hendry late yesterday.  He would like to be e-mailed a form template called "Credit Review Sheet" because he is implementing something at his new job similar to what we have.  Who would I call to get such a form?

Thanks!
Becky
x37599


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Robert L. Bradley Jr
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Robert L. Bradley
Report Total: $82.09
Amount Due Employee: $82.09

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Enron Industrial Markets
Metal Bulletin - Iron and Steel Awards for 2000
Pushiest Entrant: Enron, the US commodity trading company, which promised it would revolutionize the steel business by offering futures in hot rolled coil via its online market place.

The EIM Fundamentals Analysis group is excited to announce that Dave Allan has joined as a Director, responsible for all Forest Products lines.  He comes to EIM with 20 years of experience in the Forest Products industry, of which 14 were spent at Abitibi and 6 with Pulp and Paper Week.  Please join us in welcoming Dave.

The Siebel Team ("The Force") continues to work towards program implementation of its customer management system in early May, with training to begin at the end of April.  Stay tuned for updates.

Enron Global LNG
Enron Global LNG is positioning itself to be a creator and leader of a global wholesale LNG market.  The rising prices of natural gas in the United States and concerns over future energy supplies have created a bullish outlook for LNG in the U.S. and around the globe.   LNG has played a major role in serving energy needs in many parts of the world, but its place in the U.S. energy picture has been limited. An LNG market that spans the globe can supply vast amounts of otherwise stranded gas to the world's growing appetite for cleaner burning fuels.   Enron Global LNG sees great opportunity for Enron's wholesale energy business model to help shape yet another energy market.

IN THE NEWS

Enron Corp. Says First-Quarter Profit Rose 20 Percent
Houston, April 17 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp., the largest energy trader, said first-quarter profit rose 20 percent as sales almost quadrupled. Profit from operations rose to $406 million, or 47 cents, from $338 million, or 40 cents, in the year-earlier period.  Enron raised its 2001 profit forecast to $1.75 to $1.80 a share, from its January projection of $1.70 to $1.75.

First-quarter revenue surged to $50.1 billion from $13.1 billion as Enron boosted the volume of power sold in North America by 90 percent. Enron had a first-quarter gain of $19 million, or 2 cents a share, for an accounting change, making net income $425 million, or 49 cents a share. There were no charges or gains in the year-earlier period.

WELCOME
New Hires
EGM - Janelle Russell,
EIM   - David Allan, Sylvia Carter
ENA  - Sasha Divelbiss, Amy Quirsfeld, Judy Zhang, Annette Thompson, Kelly Donlevy-Lee, Grant Patterson

Transfers (to or within)
ENA - William Abler, Magdalena Cruz, Barbara Taylor, James Reyes, Marvin Carter, Angel Tamariz, Jesse Bryson
EIM - Cassandra Dutton, Christine Sullivan, Camille Gerard, Sherri Kathol, Jennifer Watson
EGM - Steven Batchelder

LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries.  It is intended for internal use only and should not be disclosed.


MP,

Apply that volume to the Cannon Storage deal.  The meter is already on the
ticket for that time period.

D

Mary Poorman@ENRON
11/29/2000 02:52 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Flagstaff on 11/10

Daren,

A small volume (352 Dth) flowed on the 10th at Flagstaff meter, I think it
may have been a test volume.  Do you want to put in a deal or hit strangers
for now?

Please advise.

Mary


Mark,

Thanks. Vince

From: Mark Lay/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/16/2001 10:55 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Blood Bank

Vince,

I must apologize.  I have not had time to look over the proposal in any
detail.  When I first spoke with your friend, it was apparent that he was
still pre-business plan stage.  He has since sent me some ideas and
information.  I think the concept has merit, but there are so many political
issues that I am concerned about the ultimate business viability.

Give me the weekend to look over the information.

Thanks,
Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kaminski, Vince
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Mark Lay/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Blood Bank

Mark,

Any further thoughts on the blood bank concept?
Please, let  me know if I can be helpful?

Vince


FYI.? On November 22, Edison filed advice letter 1500-E,  which?revises
Schedule PX to reflect the use of gross load, rather than net  load for
self-generation customers in calculating the Grid Management Charge
applicable to customers, as assessed by the ISO.? This filing is made in
response to ISO,s November 1 filing at FERC to unbundle the GMC applicable
to  scheduling coordinators.? ISO proposes that the Control Area Services
Charge be assessed to SCs for all loads behind the end user,s meter,
including  loads served by on-site generation.? Edison is therefore revising
Schedule  PX to reflect the use of gross load in the determination of the GMC
for  self-generating customers.
?
On the same date, Edison filed advice letter 1499-E, which revises Schedule
PX to reflect an increase to the utility's purchase limits for bilateral and
BFM  products.? As background, when Edison filed its AL 1429-E last January,
it  requested that its trading limits be based on its "net short" position
for the  relevant quarter.? At that time, Edison said that its net short
position  would likely increase in the future due to further generation
divestiture or  load growth.? In response to subsequent advice letters, the
Commission  authorized further increases to the trading limits.? The utility
cites  FERC,s November 1 Order with regard to the need for the utilities to
have  greater forward purchasing and risk management tools, load growth and
the return  of direct access customers as the justification for the
Commission to increase  the current forward purchase limits.The utility now
requests that the combined  limits for forward energy and capacity
procurement be increased to 4,400, 5,800,  9,600 and 6,800 MW for the first
through fourth quarters, respectively.? In  addition, the utility requests
further adders, to reflect further divestiture  and QF generation that may
switch to PX-based pricing, to increase these limits  up to 8,300,
9,700,13,500 and 10,700 MW for these quarters.? The advice  letter provides a
series of tables which summarize various events which, should  they occur,
would enable Edison to automatically increase its purchase limits,  without
further advice letters.? Instead, the utility would only submit a  compliance
letter which informed the Commission that the event had occurred and  the
limits were being increased.
?
Comments are due on December 12.? I don't have an electronic copy of  the
filings, but if anyone wants a fax, please let me know and I'll send it to
you tomorrow (am out of the office today without access to a fax).
?
Dan


Tom entered this trade as Firm and FPL says on their confirmation as
Transmission Contingent. Which is correct?

KI


Steve -

As you requested, attached please find the Analyst compensation comparables
we discussed last week:

We are having an extremely tough time recruiting Analysts from Rice because
our main competition on campus comes from consulting companies (Bain,
McKinsey, BCG, EY, Andersen, etc.) and investment banks (Goldman, JP Morgan,
CSFB, Merrill Lynch, etc.).  Even though these companies are not directly in
our industry group, they are our principal competitors for talent at Rice.

As evidenced by our recruiting performance this year and in previous years,
we loose nearly every time when we compete with these companies.    In the
last three years of recruiting at Rice, only 1 or 2 people have accepted our
offer.  The other Analysts who are rice alumni (myself included) joined Enron
through other circumstances.

I think our poor performance at Rice is due primarily to the following
factors:

Compensation:  The Enron compensation package  is below that of our
competitors at Rice.  Additionally, there is more risk associated with our
offer, since Enron's compensation structure relies more heavily on the year
end bonus than some of our competitors.  In the cases where the package is
similar (ie, McKinsey), we loose folks because of other company's name and
prestige.
Rotations:  Most investment banks give their analysts offers to work in
specific groups (M&A, Trading, Etc.).  Our analyst recruits can express a
preference, but their placement is not guaranteed.    This also creates an
added element of risk and uncertainty.

In sum, I think we will continue to be unsuccessful in our recruiting efforts
at Rice if we do not address these issues.

Should you need any further information, please feel free to contact me.

Regards,

Alex Hernandez
ENA - Principal Investments
713-345-4059

---------------------- Forwarded by Alejandro Hernandez/NA/Enron on
12/15/2000 03:31 PM ---------------------------

Alejandro Hernandez
12/15/2000 03:30 PM
To: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Braly/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jana
Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelly Butler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David
Hunker/ENRON@enronxgate, Priya Jaisinghani/NA/Enron@Enron, Carrie
Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Erin A Rice/LON/ECT@ECT, Julie Davidson/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Analyst Compensation Comparables

Charlene -

As we discussed yesterday, attached please find a comparable compensation
analysis for this year's Analyst offers:

We believe that the low acceptance rate ( 14/112 ) we are experiencing this
year is due to the following reasons:

Enron's base salary is significantly below that of our competitors
The bonus ranges were not mentioned in the offer letters

I hope this information is useful to you as we continue our efforts to
attract quality employees to Enron.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Regards,

Alex Hernandez
Analyst Advisory Board
x54059


---------------------- Forwarded by David M Gagliardi/TTG/HouInd on
08/15/2000 07:51 AM ---------------------------

"Michael Gagliardi" <mggagliardi@duke-energy.com> on 08/15/2000 07:17:25 AM

To:   DGagliardi@reliantenergy.com, David_ricks@GSDM.com
cc:

Subject:  True Orange Fax/E-Mail #68

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael
Gagliardi/Hou-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC on 08/15/2000 07:26 AM
---------------------------

TruOrange@aol.com on 08/14/2000 10:25:12 PM

To:   undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:    (bcc: Michael Gagliardi/Hou-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC)
Subject:  True Orange Fax/E-Mail #68

True Orange Fax/E-Mail Service
Volume 8, Fax/E-Mail #68, Monday, August 14, 2000
Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange, P. O. Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755 -
Phone
512-795-8536

Roy Williams Leads Outstanding Freshman Class in Workouts
The heralded Longhorn freshman class had its first two workouts Monday, and
several players looked very good, but big, fast WR Roy Williams was almost
too impressive to believe.
He's big, at about 6-3 or maybe 6-4 and a little over 200 pounds (we should
get official heights and weights Tuesday) and he is fast (10.03 100 meters
last track season) and no one could cover him Monday. He caught so many
long
passes I lost count.
Pitty poor Nathan Vasher, the lone scholarship DB among the freshmen. He
had
to try to cover Williams, B. J. Johnson, Sloan Thomas and Tony Jeffery, the
best group of freshman wide receivers in the country. As soon as he got
through with one and got a little breather, it was on to the next one.
Vasher
actually did a good job most of the time on everybody except Williams, who
was just too big and too strong for him to handle. Vasher does a good job
of
man coverage, getting right with the wide receiver and staying with him on
most occasions.
Also pity poor QB Chance Mock, who probably threw more passes Monday than
he
did in his whole career at The Woodlands. He showed great accuracy and
touch
on long and short passes, and offensive coordinator Greg Davis,
complimented
him for having "a quick release." But I'll bet his arm is sore Tuesday.
Coach Mack Brown said he doesn't normally want to play freshmen,
particularly
early in the season, but he said it is easier for wide receivers to play
early than for most other players.
"Take our two freshmen defensive ends, Kalen Thornon and Adam Doiron,"
Brown
said. "They are very good prospects, but they have never lined up against
anybody like Leonard Davis, and that's what they'll start doing when the
veterans show up. Their learning curve goes up pretty drastically, and they
probably will need some time to cope with that."
But he said it's a different story with wide receivers. "If a receiver can
run, jump, catch and do something after he catches it, Brown said, "we can
make the offense simpler for him,"
Darryl Drake, the wide receiver coach, phrased it another way, saying, "If
a
guy is 6-3 or 6-4, can run close to a 10-flat hundred meters and high jump
seven feet (Williams did all that last year at Odessa Permian), we'll just
tell him to run down the field and, if anybody can keep up with him,
they're
probably short cornerbacks and he can outjump them for the ball. We'll
coach
him next year, but he can get by with the speed and jumping ability this
year." Drake was only partially kidding.
When Williams has to try to get off the line against big-time correrbacks
like Quentin Jammer and Roderick Babers, the two UT starters, it will be
harder, but Brown said all the receivers are going to get a lot of work
against bump-and-run coverage. He also said he expects at least two of them
to play a lot early in the season;
Thomas, Johnson and Jeffery also had some good plays. Thomas made one great
catch of a high ball that appeared to be out of his reach.
One UT assistant coach told me today he has never seen back-to-back classes
as outstanding as the two the Longhorns have put together the last two
years.
The freshmen will have their final workouts as a group Tuesday. The varsity
reports Wednesday and the first full team workouts will be Friday.
* * * *
RECRUITING NOTES: The news got as little better today on the state's best
quarterback, Matt Nordgren, 6-5, 217, 4.62, of Dallas Bishop Lynch. He
visited Colorado unofficially last weekend and came back very impressed and
saying he wants to delay his decision on picking a college.
But he told me today the Longhorn coaches are recruiting two quarterbacks
(Bret Rawls of Louisiana powerhouse Shreveport Evangel is the other one)
"and
they gave us both a deadline of October 15 and told us to look around and
be
sure what we want to do. I think that is a real sign of class," he said.
"I'll probably take some official visits before that, maybe to Colorado,
Kansas, LSU and Tennessee, and then I'll take an official visit to Texas. I
still say Texas will be hard to beat, but I just want to be real sure
before
I make a decision."
* * * *
My next fax will be Tuesday, August 15.
* * * *
The True Orange Fax Service includes  at  least  99 faxes  a year and costs
$99 ($79 by E-Mail). The True Orange Newsletter includes  26 newsletters
and
is published weekly during football season and twice monthly during most of
the other months. It costs $45. Save by subscribing to both for $130 (or
$110
if you take the faxes via E-Mail  or $99 if you take the faxes and
newsletter
via E-Mail). Send check  to address at the top of page. I also  update my
900 number

- 1-900-288-8839
- frequently with recruiting news. My E-Mail
address is: truorange@aol.com


Kay;
        I read the corporate counsel roundtable in the Texas Lawyer
supplement in which you, Alan Crain, et al. held forth on complex
transactional matters.  I was impressed, proud, but not surprised, by
the article.
        Glenn

 - glennlegge.vcf


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 9:11 AM
To:	'"Lemont, Mary kay (Exchange)" <mklemont@bear.com>@ENRON'
Subject:	RE: ECT Europe Finance, Inc. ("ECT Europe")

Mary Kay:

I am faxing to you this morning those documents that we have signed so far.  Will you send me your physical delivery address so that I can send the originals to you?

Thanks!

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lemont, Mary kay (Exchange)" <mklemont@bear.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:04 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: ECT Europe Finance, Inc. ("ECT Europe")

Marie, we processed a transaction today in this new ECT Europe Finance Inc.
acct.  I was wondering if you have any forms that you could fax us.
Thanks,
MK Lemont

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie [mailto:Marie.Heard@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:41 PM
To:	mklemont@bear.com
Cc:	Doukas, Tom; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	ECT Europe Finance, Inc. ("ECT Europe")

Ms. Lemont:

It is our understanding that in connection with the opening of the
referenced account, Bear Stearns has agreed to allow ECT Europe to sign
the same form of Institutional Account Agreement that Enron Credit Inc.
signed in April, 2001.  Please forward execution copies of such
agreement to us and we will obtain execution on behalf of ECT Europe.
Additionally, we are in the process of adopting resolutions on behalf of
ECT Europe allowing for the opening of brokerage accounts.  Will Bear
Stearns be able to open the ECT Europe account prior to receiving the
corporate documentation?

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************

****************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************


Stinson,
Helyette can be reached at 413 549 5071

and Geman@math.umass.edu.

Vince


Kim Theriot want to set up a meeting tomorrow July 10th at 1:00 until 2:00 re: NA upsteam.  Is this time okay with you.

Rae Meadows
Senior Administrative Assistant
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-9282
rae.meadows@enron.com


FYI - I don't know anything about this deal other than the fact that Chris
Foster asked me a question.  I referred Chris to Christopher who had worked
on the APEA transaction which had similar issues.  SS

Tracy Ngo
10/21/99 12:59 PM
To: Christopher Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Cini/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Aquilla Muni Deal

I do not have any information on this tentative deal either.  I would suggest
that we hold tight unless Sara Shackleton or Chris Foster can give us some
additional information to go forward with.

-tracy


FYI.  Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000 10:40
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Nicole West @ ENRON                           01/24/2000 05:11 PM

To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Enron Corp.'s Subsidiaries


Jon Mckay will manage Brad's products.  What products had we assigned to Pete?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Palmer, B. Scott
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 1:59 PM
To:	Neal, Scott
Subject:	FW: EOL products

Scott,

Now that Brad and Pete are gone, who do you want to do thier products that we had set them up on previously? Thanks.

Scott
3-6599
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Monday, January 28, 2002 1:31 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Palmer, B. Scott; Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	EOL products

Now that we know which traders will be moving over, or we should, we need to make a second pass at the EOL product list.  Can you confirm with your desk heads that the list of names we have is correct, and then update the product mappings by tomorrow afternoon?

O:\erms\erms_adm\netco\controls\Trader-Book template (US Gas)_EOL new books.xls

Thanks

KK


Hello Sara,

I received your voice message and called you back but you are not available.

My understanding of where we stand is not consistent with yours.  Here is my
understanding:

Guaranty: Yes, I got the guaranty executed and have it in my possession.

Assignment  Agreement:  No, we do not have a final draft.  As I mentioned on
Friday, the last version that Anna sent did not have all of the all of the
edits/changes I had recommended to her implemented.  In particular, the
arbitration language had not been changed and there were some grammatical
edits.  I refaxed my comments today; Anna agreed to implement them and I am
awaiting her draft.  (Anna may not have gotten some faxes on Thursday or
Friday because her fax number changed when she changed building locations
last week).

Account Agreement: Yes, you are correct that Anna has to send back a revised
draft.  She and I have been clling each other every hour.  Anna said that she
would get back to me in two hours or so after her meeting on another matter.

Authorized Traders List:  Stephanie had originally taken on this task and
sent me an email indicating that the list was complete.  Last week, Stephanie
indicated that the information upon which she relied was no longer in the
database.  Therefore, there is some confusion as to who the corporate
officers are.  I called Richard Sage, with whom Stephanie has been in
contact, for assistance.  He has not called me back so if you had further
suggestions on how to proceeed, please let me know.

Account & Tax Forms: I have the requisite form -- the same one I have used
for the same tasks for other new Enron entities - in my possession and am in
the process of filling them out.

Logistics: You indicated in your voice message that you were not sure whether
I had thought logistically about getting the agreement executed.  Let me
reassure you that I have.  In light of the above, I did not maintain the view
that all the documents would be ready for signature by noon particularly
because (1) we do not have in our possession final versions of two of the
three agreements and (2) I determined on Friday that the Authorized Officers
List might now be outdated.  I received some emails today disclosing how to
proceed re: sending the document.  However, as I confirmed with you on
Friday, I spoke with Mike Bruegel on Thursday and confirmed where to send the
documents.

When you are available, please let me know so we can update and resolution on
how to proceed on any outstanding matters.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


Here it is.  Michelle

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 11:43
AM ---------------------------

FMackin@aol.com on 03/23/2000 11:50:42 AM
To: Michelle.Cash@enron.com
cc: pbutler@enron.com, kbolton@enron.com
Subject: Deferral of Payouts under LTIP

To:  Michelle Cash

Date:  March 23, 2000

From:  Patrick Mackin

Subject:  Enron Investment Partners Long Term Incentive Plan;
    Deferral of Payouts Under Enron Corp. Deferral Plan

Michelle, Carol Jewett called me this morning about including a provision in
the long term incentive plan ("LTIP") being established for Enron Investment
Partners (old Enron Development Corp.) to permit deferral of payouts under
the Enron Corp. Deferral Plan.

I suggested to Carol that such a provision in the LTIP would not be
appropriate or sufficient; that the tail cannot wag the dog.  If such
deferrals are to be permitted, they would have to be authorized and made
under the provisions of the Enron Corp. Deferral Plan.  Also, there are some
additional issues discussed below.

Any compensatory arrangement that by design or practice defers payment of the
benefit until or beyond termination of an employee,s employment is considered
to be a "pension plan" under ERISA.

ERISA contains complex and challenging administrative, participation and
funding requirements  (which most employers want to avoid) for such non-tax
qualified pension plans.  The way to avoid these requirements is to design
such a compensatory program, such as a deferral plan, so that it is a "top
hat" plan which is exempt, not from ERISA, but from the more onerous
requirements.

For example, only employees who meet the "top hat" definition are permitted
to participate in the Enron Corp. Deferral Plan.  Enron Corp. is not willing
to let all employees who participate in the LTIP make deferrals to the Enron
Corp. Deferral Plan.  Any participant in the LTIP who wants to defer a payout
must first pass the screening test for top hat employees applied by Enron
Corp. Compensation and then make the deferral election on an approved form.
Also, any such employee must become an employee of Enron Corp. and then
reassigned or seconded to work for Enron Investment Partners.  This
employment requirement is to avoid multiple employer problems related to the
Enron Corp. Deferral Plan and its related trust.

Michelle, it may be "better, faster, simpler" to include a deferral feature
in the LTIP.  The same ERISA issues are present, but Enron Investment
Partners is in control.

Regardless, let,s discuss the design for the deferrals at your convenience.

Pat


mark, ken,

.............And here are the Appendices to Simmons & Simmons' advice

Justin

--------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 20/09/2000 19:34
---------------------------

London Fax System
20/09/2000 15:01
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: New fax received (Likely sender: +44 020 7628 2070).

You have received a new fax from +44 020 7628 2070

The image contains 37 page(s).


Please respond today if you are attending the Team Celebration this Thursday, November 29th at 4pm in the Double Tree.
Alma
36503


Swap confirms
----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 04:06 PM -----

	Stacy E Dickson
	03/29/2001 05:04 PM

		 To: Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Confirm

Here are the swap confirmations.

----- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 05:04 PM -----

	Larry Joe Hunter
	03/29/2001 04:45 PM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Confirm

Stacy,

See attached.  We do have an executed ISDA with NUI Energy Brokers, Inc.
Also, there is Draft language in the header and footer that you may want to
take out.

Thanks,
Joe


Here are my comments:

Revise  "whereas" clauses to make it an option for an easement, not a current
grant of an easement.

Should we be able to enter all of Parcel 2 for due diligence, as opposed to
just the easement area?  (paragraph 7)

Matt, I wanted you to be aware of paragraph 17.

Kay

"Way, Karen S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com> on 09/15/2000 02:04:35 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "'fred.mitro@enron.com'"
<fred.mitro@enron.com>, "'rusty.stevens@enron.com'" <rusty.stevens@enron.com>
cc: "Shindler, Donald A. - CHI" <Donald.Shindler@piperrudnick.com>

Subject: ledford-titan option to purchase , livingston county.DOC

 <<ledford-titan option to purchase , livingston county.DOC>>

Attached hereto, please find the draft Ledford-Titan Option to Purchase Real
Estate and Grant of Easement for your review.  Per my emails with Rusty, we
intend to messenger the execution copies to the Ledford's attorney on Monday
at mid-day.  Therefore, please send me your comments at your earliest
convenience.  Thank you.

____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________

 - ledford-titan option to purchase , livingston county.DOC


TTotten@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hour beginning 18:00 in the October 23, 2001
Real-Time Market as well as the following hours per ECA 20010608B to verify
prices:

HQ:  6:00, 7:00 and 14:00
OH:  6:00, 7:00 and 14:00
NE:  6:00, 7:00 and 14:00
PJM: 6:00, 7:00 and 14:00

Prices in the October 24, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be
found at the following address of our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


Enron employees may find the current circumstances stressful.  We want to remind you that Enron's Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is still available and currently offering services to assist you and your family.

Group Discussions
Beginning this week, Enron's EAP provider, Innovative Resources Group, will be facilitating group discussions for employees who are interested in attending. These sessions are designed to address the challenges employees may be facing and to suggest ways to minimize the impact of stress on employees and their families. These sessions will be held on Wednesday, January 30 and Thursday, January 31 at the following times in EB32C2:

	9:00 am -- 10:00 am
	11:00 am -- 12:00 pm
	1:30  pm --  2:30 pm
	3:30 pm --   4:30 pm

No advance registration is necessary -- simply come to EB32C2 at the scheduled day and time that is most convenient for you.

Onsite Confidential Counseling / 24 Hour Hotline
EAP Counselors are available for individual, confidential appointments onsite in the Enron Building or at a variety of neighborhood locations.  Counselors are also available via telephone 24 hours a day, seven days a week for Enron employees in all locations.  The EAP counseling service is provided at no cost to employees and their family members.  To schedule an appointment or speak with a counselor, please call the onsite office at 713-853-6057 or the 24-hour number at 1-800-345-1391.

Informational Brochures
Additional information about EAP programs will be available in the Body Shop, the Health Center on the third floor of Enron Center North and soon in the common kitchen areas on all floors of the Enron Buildings.

Websites
The following links may also provide helpful information:
www.stress.org -- This is the website of the American Institute of Stress. The site provides general information on stress management and links to other related sites.
www.wellnessjunction.com -- This website has been developed by Health Resources Publishing and provides targeted information on trends in wellness and health promotion.


Not sure if you need this one but forwarding just in case.
---------------------- Forwarded by Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2001 10:01
AM ---------------------------
From: Joe Connor@ENRON on 06/29/2001 05:30 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: SE Trans / Southern Issues / Strategy

Attached is my list of issues for the SE Trans RTO and a discussion of
strategy.  If you need additional info., please let me know.


I agree with Jerry's proposal.  However, I would like to add one more
thing...
Change the "PSE Submit Deadline" for a real-time tag to 20 minutes (instead
of 30 min).  We are insinuating that already, when we say the "Provider
Assessment Time" is less-than or equal to 10 minutes and the "Time to Start
of Transaction" is greater than or equal to 20 minutes.
Anyone wishing to discuss this further, call Mons at 602-618-9798.

Thanks!
Mons Ellingson
Pinnacle West

-----Original Message-----
From: Harshbarger, Robert [mailto:bharsh@puget.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 3:52 PM
To: Ellingson, Mons M(Z34655); Fotiou, Demetrios; Grow, Lisa;
Holden-Baker, Susan; Smith, Chris; Tilghman, Carmine; Underwood, John;
Williams, Bill
Cc: Hackney, Mark W(Z39911)
Subject: FW: Possible new E-tag time table

Jerry Dempsey has sent the attached regarding the preschedule flag in E-Tag.

What he is proposing is:
*	a revision to the timeline tables in A3A to enable software to make
the determination of whether or not a tag is for preschedule or real-time
(currently it is a flag set by the PSE creating the tag).
*	Referencing time in terms of the Load Control Area's prevailing time
(this fits the Authority Service is associated with the load control area
and it's the Authority Service that keeps the time).

It may be possible to get this revision worked in to the 1.7 release.

Process
Please review his proposal and comment.
Specifically, do you support the concept of removing the flag and using the
timing table logic?
Do you support adjusting times to reference the Load Control Area prevailing
time?

If we reach a consensus on this issue by the end of the week, we can forward
on a recommendation to Mark for distribution to the whole ISAS.  If there is
support from all of ISAS, then it can be taken to NERC IS/TISWG for
approval.

Please let me know by the end of business June 15, 2001.

Bob Harshbarger
425.882.4643
> ----------
> From: 	JERRY DEMPSEY[SMTP:DEMPSEY@wapa.gov]
> Sent: 	Sunday, June 03, 2001 10:42 AM
> To: 	bharsh@puget.com
> Cc: 	Mark.Hackney@aps.com
> Subject: 	Possible new E-tag time table
>
>  <<tag time table draft june 01.doc>>
> Bob,
>
> Mark Hackney suggested I start with you on this issue since you were
> heading up the timing group for ISAS.
>
> Here is the issue - under the current WSCC timing table for tags in Policy
> 3, it is impossible to program whether or not the tag is preschedule or
> real-time.  The NERC tagging group is the group that came up with manually
> selecting the preschedule "flag".  I know that PPW, BPA and ourselves have
> run into a couple of problems with this.  It's been when the merchant has
> selected that flag when it was actually a real-time transaction.  PPW and
> ourselves put it in our scheduling system, BPA (and someone else) did not.
>
>
> At the NERC OSC meeting last week, I asked the question again about how
> can this be fixed in version 1.7.  I was hoping it was as easy as having
> each authority register their timezone in the new Master registry that's
> being developed.  Well - it wasn't that easy.  They explained the other
> problems and I then developed the attached time table.  The group reviewed
> this time table and agreed that it could be automated to determine if a
> tag was preschedule or realtime.
>
> In order to get this programmed into version 1.7, we need to get Policy 3
> revised with the new time table.  In order to get the new time table
> approved, it probably starts with your subgroup, then probably goes to
> Hackney for an e-mail vote to ISAS, then probably on to WSCC OC, then
> finally to NERC.  Problem is we need to do this quickly, by the end of
> June if possible, so that the new Policy 3 will be out in time for 1.7
> release in October.
>
> Now - there's nothing that says this has to happen either.  Another option
> is to just leave it as it is today.  I'd prefer to automate it, but that's
> only my opinion.
>
> At any rate - the NERC OSC has agreed to include timezone in the new NERC
> Master registry.  They have also agreed to incorporate this change into
> 1.7 if it's part of Policy 3.  That's were we stand right now.
>
> As for your subgroup - I don't think I'm on your list, but go ahead and
> add me on if you don't mind.
>
> Call or e-mail if you have any questions.
>
> Thanks - Jerry
> dempsey@wapa.gov
> (970)461-7299
>
>

 - Jerry's Proposal.doc
 - Mons' Proposal.doc


Dick Basford (formerly, a consultant for Enron on Florida matters) called me with a recommendation that EPMI withdraw from FRCC membership before EPMI is invoiced in February for $5750 (1/4 of annual dues of $23,000).  There is no pre-notice period for withdrawal and Dick feels that it would leave the FRCC relationship in a better light if EPMI withdraws, rather than not paying the invoice.  I tend to agree if EPMI has no further ongoing interests in trading in Florida.

UBS trading can make an application and join at any time, without an initiation fee.

Kevin/Paul--Is it ok for EPMI to withdraw?  If so, I'll draft the letter.

Thanks.  Christi  37007


>  >  >  >  > MARK YOUR CALENDARS  <  <  <  <

The Houston Technology Center cordially invites you to attend the

> > HOUSTON ANGEL NETWORK JUNE BREAKFAST MEETING
> > Wednesday, June 20,  2001

> >The Houstonian
> >111 North Post Oak Lane

> > Networking/Registration:  7:00 - 7:30 a.m.
> > Breakfast/Presentations:  7:30 - 8:30 a.m.
> > Networking:  8:30 - 9:00 a.m.

> > Please R.S.V.P. to Kathy Nethercutt: knethercutt@houstontech.org
or call 713.658.1750 no later than June 14, 2001.
> > Price to attend is $45. Please pay in advance with check or credit card.

Glenn Dublin
Director of Business Acceleration
Houston Technology Center
1200 Smith, Suite 2940
Houston, TX 77002
Phone 713-658-1750
Fax 713-668-1744
gdubin@houstontech.org

Thank you for your interest in the Houston Technology Center
Kathy B. Nethercutt
713.658.1750
www.houstontech.org


Corporate schizophrenia.  Weird.   DF

	From:  Susan Scott                           04/17/2000 03:17 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Socal

SoCal's protest is ludicrous. I will work on a response.
By the way, SoCal has actually been remarkably helpful in reaching agreement
on a settlement -- which we just signed -- in the California GIR proceeding.


What time should we expect the technician?

Mike Grigsby


It's not a short pay that I am concerned with.  They are a netout customer.
They only billed us for  $2,717,153.94. We show that we owe them
$5,479,867.12.  I thought that you were checking on a buy/sale that was
supposed to cancel off some of this payable amount.  They paid us
$17,705,483.84, which is the net of what they owed us and what they think we
owed them.

Call if that doesn't make sense.

Darla

Chris Germany@ECT
12/05/2000 01:43 PM
To: Darla Saucier/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: New Power Company

Do you have a total dollar amount that New Power paid for Oct production?
According to David Scott at New Power, they did not make any adjustments to
the bill.  He said they may not have received all of the bill, there might
have been some Michcon activity missing.

Darla Saucier@ENRON
11/27/2000 11:50 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Power Company

Hi Chris,

Please give me a call this afternoon and let me know if you've had a chance
to look over the deals for october that Mary Ellenberger emailed to you last
week. I would like to get this matter resolved this week.

Thanks
Darla


Kevin,

We are in final draft of an agreement with Natsource to allow them to execute on EnronOnline numbers for their clients.  The system should be functional within 3 weeks.  We had agreed to give Natsource access to North American Gas and Power and they are now requesting coal and emissions also.  We have no obligation however I think that it would give you potential deal flow with no brokerage fee on transactions done online.  I need to get back with Jack Cogan pretty quickly.  Is it ok with you?


Please check out the following new posted document(s) on Pipeline Safety =
Web Site. Thanks for using Pipeline Safety Web Site!
(Please click the link to view the entire document)

1. Welding PQT SR-3  ( =
http://www.ets.enron.com/PipelineSafety/psEngStds/8364a.doc )
2. Welding PQT SR-4  ( =
http://www.ets.enron.com/PipelineSafety/psEngStds/8364b.doc )
3. Welding PQT WR-3  ( =
http://www.ets.enron.com/PipelineSafety/psEngStds/8364c.doc )


A buddy in Korea sent this to me,  this is for all you computer jockey's out
there.  Especially you Brawner :)

See ya,

Lawler.
______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

 - CokeGift.exe


Hello Vince,

I have heard you were sick.   Hope it is over.

Thank you for the opportunity to visit Enron, again, and to speak to the
guys.  You have a good team. I wonder if you have come up with a decision
regarding my employment?

Look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,
Martin


When: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:30 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECS 06112

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please accept this invitation, as it will automatically populate onto your calendars.

Thank you,

Irena Hogan
x36143


Could you please set up a call and distribute to this list?  Topic:  utility
forward contracting proposal.  Time 3-4:30 pm PST.  Thanks very much.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:26 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/11/2000 10:20 AM

		 To: Stephen Swain/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Data on Monthly Generation for SCE

The votes have been counted (kidding), and the call will take place today at
3 PM PST.  Call-in number to follow.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:19 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	12/07/2000 12:13 PM

		 To: Stephen Swain/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Data on Monthly Generation for SCE

Folks:

The "subcommittee" I've referenced that's trying to come up with a solution
to California's train wreck is moving very quickly.  The group's shooting to
have a first cut at a "straw person" proposal sketched out by end of next
week.  The group's meeting on Tuesday to continue to bounce around ideas.

I'd like to try to have an internal call on Monday at either 10 AM (PST) or
3  PM (PST) to pin down at least a vaguely detailed conceptual framework that
I can propose to the subcommittee on Tuesday.  The agenda items for the
internal meeting are:

Finalize proposal for benchmark(s) for utility procurement.
Goal: increase utility willingness to enter into forward contracts by
replacing PUC after-the-fact "reasonableness" review with a benchmark. (Been
working the Portland desk on a "portfolio benchmark" concept.)

Determine our view of how to treat term contracts w.r.t. the PX credit, i.e.,
should those contracts be disclosed to the market, or should PUC keep them
confidential, calculate the PX credit behind closed doors, and publish the
credit ex poste?  The PX credit depends on the overall utility portfolio, not
just the PX price.

Let me know if 10 AM or 3 PM (PST) works better.

Harry:  I'll assume that you'll contact the folks from EES that need to
participate.

Best,
Jeff


In order to provide better oversight and control of ENA legal expenditures
on large transactions, please continue to follow the procedures set forth
below for transactions where outside legal fees and expenses are expected to
exceed $25,000.00.  The purpose of these procedures is to (i) improve
communication with counsel (inside and outside) on issues, fees and services
and (ii) send price signals on legal costs (with respect to specific
transactions) on a timely basis to the business units.  Every effort should
be made to continue to provide high quality legal work that has become
standard at ENA.

 1.  A written estimate of proposed fees and expenses and a written
description of the services shall be provided by our outside counsel.  The
responsible business unit and the General Counsel shall review and approve
such written estimate before our outside counsel is directed to provide
substantial professional services.

 2.  Our outside counsel shall be instructed to promptly submit a revised
written estimate if such outside counsel determines that legal fees and
expenses for such transaction will exceed the previous written estimate by
$25,000.00.  Such revised written estimate shall be reviewed and approved by
the responsible business unit and the General Counsel or his/her designee
before our outside counsel is directed to provide substantial additional
professional services.

 3.  In order to accurately track such expenses so that the expenses can be
properly allocated to the various business units, a work order number should
be obtained for each transaction.

 Thank you for your cooperation.  If you have any questions or any other
suggestions for controlling expenses, please call me at extension 36544.


GIven the recommenders I agree with the nomination.

From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 11/06/2000 08:24 AM
Sent by: Maureen McVicker@ENRON
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, PEGGY
FOWLER/ENRON@enronxgate, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F
Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley
Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth
Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca P Mark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, J Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, Cindy
Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen S Owens@ees@EES, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
E White/HOU/EES@EES
cc:

Subject: Recommendation of Carol Hensley

 John Sherriff and I are recommending Carol Hensley (VP Marketing and
Communications at Azurix) for a VP position in John,s organization.  Carol
was a director in the Enron PR group before moving to Azurix.  Her new role
would be to support EnronCredit.com.  A critical success factor for
EnronCredit.com will be to establish a strong brand in the coming months.

 In her time at Azurix, Carol has added significantly to her skills and
experience.  I spoke with John Garrison at length about Carol,s performance
at Azurix.  She has expanded her marketing services skills and provided
significant support in the investor relations arena.  Garrison relates that
the Azurix commercial leaders view Carol as a partner, informed about the
business and instrumental in handling crises and pursuing business
opportunities.

 John Sherriff and Ken Lay join me in recommending that Carol keep her VP
title as she returns to Enron.

 A copy of Carol's resume is attached.


Fred,

Now that Daren has the purchase in, I have added August to the Deal Ticket
386540 which is the Desk to Desk at the meter (4584 on Humble P/L, pathed as
a Buy/Sell), and to Deal Ticket 386269 which is the Transport Usage ticket
(from 4584 to meter 12 at the plant inlet, pathed on Humble contract 401).
Please set up the appropriate track id's.  Since this is OffSystem, that
should take care of the August issue.

Mary


Jason,
could you please test the New Sitara Report (WACOG Desk to Desk).
Here is the URL for this report http://sitrpt.dev.corp.enron.com/reports/wacog_dsk2dsk.asp
If you have any questions let me know.
thanks
Krishna
35216

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wolfe, Jason
Sent:	Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:31 PM
To:	Lattupally, Krishna
Subject:	proposed sitara report

Krishna,

I am looking to create a new report based on an existing sitara report that generates a deal list by pub code to estimate
various indexes during bid week. This was first made for Anne Bike, West Desk risk group.

The purpose of this new report is to generate a list of Desk-To-Desk deals for a given period and desk and generate a WACOG.
The parameters for this new query include:

From and To Dates
Gas location (including All)
Desk (including All)

It should return to and from dates, volume, price, location, sitara number, tagg number, eol number (if any), and desk
It should generate subtotal volumes and WACOG for each desk, and each pipe location in each desk

Desks include: ENA - IM WSOCAL, ENA - IM WSJ, ENA - IM WKEYSTONE, ENA - IM WPGE, ENA - IM WROCKIES

If possible, the data should export into excel.

Thanks,
Jason Wolfe
Trading Analyst, West Desk
30568


Thanks.  I don't think that there should be a fin gd swap position of 12 lots
in the mojave index column.  Please check to see how the deal was booked.

Thanks,
Mike


Do you all have any rodeo tickets?  I'm thinking about going to stand in
line?  I want to see Destiny's Child, what about you?


Please see the attached letter to Senator Wyden.  I am also sending a hard
copy by regular mail.


I guess I would have shot him.

Look out for very cold temps by this weekend and next week.  Coldest in 4
years.


please give me a call when time permits

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


OOOPS!   This is effective the 1st.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mark McCoy/Corp/Enron on 02/01/2001 03:43
PM ---------------------------

Mark McCoy
02/01/2001 04:45 PM
To: Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: point change for deals

FYI---I changed points on this deal from PGTT-TECO Waha 18002800 to PGTT-TECO
Katy 20606100 for the 2nd.  Let me know if you don't agree with this.  The
supply, Duke Field Svs, was originally trying to deliver to HPL at Midtex,
this deal #589257 was also changed to meter 20606100.

Thanks,
Mark


Steve/Jimmy -

Pursuant to your conversations with Bob and the e-mail messages that have
been traded, I have updated and finalized the BETA and Fee Agreement.  The
changes from the last draft of 3/20 are reflected in the updated draft of
3/22 where in the prior changes have been incorporated and the two items
identified below have been addressed.  The final documents incorporate the
new changes.

The two items that were addressed were:

1.  The change in Paragraph 3(e) of the BETA from 48 hours on the LC notice
to two (2) business days.

2.  In Paragraph 3(f) of the BETA and on Page 2 of the FA, language has been
inserted to address the view only status until the LC is delivered to Enron.

Other than these, there were a couple of minor clean-up changes (e.g.,
inclusion of "Date:" above both of Amerex's signature blanks and deletion of
unnecessary spaces between paragraphs).

Presuming all is in order with the attached, please have two originals of
both the BETA and FA printed and signed by Amerex.  These originals, together
with the first installment of the Access Fee, should be forwarded to either
me or Bob for counter-signature by Enron.  Thereafter, a fully signed
original of each document will be delivered to Amerex for its records.

If there are any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to
call me or Bob.

Thanks again for the continued cooperation.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Don
I want to thank you for passing my Resume to the appropriate person there. I will have a job interview tomorrow with Lydia Delgado (Human Resources) and Marc Dana Davis (not sure what department since Miss Delgado just mention "Trading").
I also want to take this opportunity to let you know that another friend of mine is looking into Enron, and I mention him that you could have a position open in your area. He has worked with us for 2-3 years now, and I fully recommend him.
I will ask him to send you a copy of his resume, and I hope that you can help.
I want to thank you again for your help.
Sincerely,
Jose C. Vulpes
Sr. FX Trader
Banamex Houston
713 739 8740
800 882 8740
jvulpes@banamex.com


Below is a list of attorneys that are visiting the Houston office prior to
the ENA Legal Conference.

Atty	Home Location	Ext.	Office
Justin Boyd	London	(713) 345-2520	EB3808
Rahul Saxena	London	(713) 345-2678	EB3807
Mathew Dawson	London	(713) 345-2680	EB3812
Mark Evans	London	(713) 345-2679	EB3811A
David Minns	Australia	(713) 345-2682	EB3883
Matt Lee	Japan	(713) 345-2681	EB3828
Limor Nissan	New York	(713) 345-2683	EB3891
Alison Moss	Teesside	(713) 345-2722	EB3858F


Over the last few months, we have been discussing our standard E-mail
platform with you, our customer.  Your feedback from the various
demonstrations, surveys and Technology Showcases validated that E-mail is a
vital part of your ability to communicate effectively.  However, your
feedback also indicated that you need your E-mail client to have additional
functionality and increased integration with other applications you use.
Therefore, to meet the demands of our fast-paced business, Enron Net Works is
standardizing our E-mail platform by deploying Microsoft Outlook 2000 to all
the Business Units we currently support for messaging.  (Project plans for
EBS, EES and Azurix are still being finalized and will be communicated
separately.)

This conversion from Lotus Notes to Outlook 2000 will improve your ability to
communicate and provide a more consistent look and feel across the standard
office applications you use on a daily basis.  We are excited about this
opportunity to provide a more robust, full function solution for your
messaging needs.   To provide you with additional details about the
conversion from Lotus Notes to Outlook 2000, we are including a list of
frequently asked questions about this project.

How does this project affect me?
Your current Lotus Notes E-mail system will be converted to Microsoft Outlook
2000.

What is Microsoft Outlook 2000?
Outlook 2000 is the messaging client you will use to read your E-mail, update
your calendar and personal address book, record to do lists, etc.

Why are we switching to Outlook 2000?
Outlook 2000 integrates more effectively with our new operating system,
Windows 2000, and the Microsoft products that Enron currently uses. With
Outlook 2000, we can provide you with a more robust mail platform including
the following new features:

Instant Messaging ) Ability to send person-to-person, immediate, pop-up
messages.
Improved Palm/CE Synchronization ) Allows for simpler and quicker updates of
your hand held device from multiple places.
Conferencing Server ) Ability to conduct video conferences from your desktop.
Web Access ) Ability to retrieve your Enron E-mail via a browser.
Fax Integration ) Ability to send/receive faxes from your E-mail Inbox.
Voice Mail Integration ) Ability to have your voice mail delivered to your
E-mail Inbox for retrieval.

When will the Outlook 2000 rollout start and when will I get it?
The pilot will begin in late October with the production rollout beginning in
late November.  We are finalizing our Business Unit rollout schedule.
Additional information will be provided to all business units as it becomes
available.  Project updates will be posted on the Project section of the IT
Central web site at http://itcentral.enron.com.  Additionally, you may send
questions to Outlook.2000@enron.com, and a member of the project team will be
happy to address these individually.


-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Cisneros [mailto:gilc@usmcoc.org]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 10:58 AM
To: ****Gil Cisneros
Subject: Western Mayor's Trade Mission to Mexico City, March 7-10, 2001

THE AMBASSADOR OF GOOD BUSINESS!

UNITED STATES-MEXICO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Rocky Mountain Regional Chapter
George P. Heinrich, President
Carlos Barros, Honorary President
Gil Cisneros, Senior Regional Director

MARK YOU CALENDARS:

USMCOC-Rocky Mountain Chapter

WESTERN MAYOR,S TRADE MISSION TO

MEXICO CITY!

March 7-10, 2001

Mayors of cities from the following states will
be invited to participate:

Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North
Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico,
Arizona, Utah, Idaho, and Nevada

We will be meeting with major Mexico government
and private sector leaders.

More details to follow:

?,s please contact Gil Cisneros at gilc@usmcoc.org
or call 303.986.9410

Gil Cisneros
Senior Regional Director
US-MEXICO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Rocky Mountain Region Chapter
12211 West Alameda Parkway, #203A
Denver, CO  80228-2825
303.986.9410
303.986.9405
gilc@usmcoc.org
www.usmcoc.org


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Historical Sep Gas Cracks
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SepUnleadCrack50.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


we're all scrambling about next week...

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

> Edison doesn't want to play?