This is one of those to show to Amr to quantify.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 5:19 PM
To:	Miller, Stephanie
Cc:	Tycholiz, Barry; Steffes, James D.; Lawner, Leslie; Nicolay, Christi
Subject:	RE: Kern River 2002 Expansion Project (CP01-31)

Yep - in fact, they did.  I just haven't got around to summarizing the order yet.  Here's some excerpts:

"We reach no determination regarding whether PG&E Transmission's system-wide cost of fuel will increase above the current cost, since the outcome depends on numerous factors, such as the total pipeline volumes transported and the price of fuel.  Instead, as discussed below, and in accordance with Enron's request [way to go, FERC!!], we will act to insulate existing shippers from increased fuel costs attributable to the proposed expansion."

After suggesting that it would have been more appropriate to calculate fuel costs by using the average of the latest twelve months of actual data in place of the theoretical maximum rate, FERC directed "PG&E Transmission to design a surcharge to ensure that expansion shippers are subject to an incremental fuel charge for fuel costs above the costs attributable to fuel absent the proposed addition of 97,500 horsepower of compression.  In addition, PG&E must indicate compliance with this condition whenever it files to adjust its compressor fuel surcharge and whenever it files its annual gas fuel reimbursement reports." (emphasis added)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Stephanie
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:48 PM
To:	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Cc:	Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: Kern River 2002 Expansion Project (CP01-31)

Do you think the Commission would apply this same principal to PGT's 2002 expansion?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:36 PM
To:	Miller, Stephanie; South, Steven P.; Gay, Randall L.; Sullivan, Patti; Allen, Phillip K.; Shireman, Kristann; Superty, Robert; Calcagno, Suzanne; McMichael Jr., Ed; Smith, George F.; Grigsby, Mike
Cc:	Nicolay, Christi; Lawner, Leslie; Steffes, James D.; Canovas, Guillermo; Pharms, Melinda; Kaufman, Paul; Fulton, Donna
Subject:	Kern River 2002 Expansion Project (CP01-31)

According to the Draft Order that was voted out at the Commission meeting today, the subject project, as amended to reflect the approval of the California Action Project, is approved, subject to certain conditions including restrictions on rolled-in rate treatment.

The Commission was concerned that the additional fuel costs could exceed the rate reduction to existing shippers.  Kern River's projections were based on a $3.00/dth cost of gas.  The Commission conditioned its approval of rolled-in rate treatment by providing that, "in its future compliance tariff filing to roll-in the costs and lower transmission rates, Kern River must submit revised exhibits showing the excess revenues over the incremental cost-of-service, and the net benefits after anticipated fuel costs are considered" (Kern River's settlement in RP99-274 requires it to reduce its rates for existing customers coincident with the in-service date for newly certificated facilities if it receives approval for rolled-in rate treatment).  Additionally, if during any year, the combined level of the electric and gas fuel expenses exceed the benchmark level(s) of excess revenues established in the tariff filing, then Kern River must allocate the excess portion of fuel costs to its expansion shippers.  Thus, Kern River must always assure that this expansion does not increase costs for existing shippers.

The Commission rejected concerns of the existing firm shippers as well as SoCal Gas about the potential for additional curtailment at Wheeler Ridge.  The Commission found that the potential for increased curtailment did not warrant rejection or modification of Kern River's proposal, in part because SoCal Gas does not offer firm service on its system and therefore existing shippers have never had any assurance that Socal Gas would accept their gas.

The Draft Order is 49 pages long.  Please advise if you would like a hard copy.


Confirming names that I gave you over the phone this am (with one addition - for Calgary - and one clarification on volume management):

Gas Risk:		Jeff Gossett

Power Risk:		Stacey White

Documentation &
Settlements (a) :	Leslie Reeves

Gas Vol Mgmt:		Rita Wynne/Mark McClure (b)

Calgary Ops:		Peggy Hedstrom

Notes:

(a)	Documentation and Settlements under Leslie Reeves includes power, gas and financial derivatives.

(b)	Currently, Rita Wynne and Mark McClure co-lead gas volume management.  Bob's plan for NetCo is that Rita Wynne
	would be in NetCo and that Mark McClure would be on the team to lead volume management for the estate.


Attached is ENA's form of gty for Cilcorp Inc.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Richard - I will need your help on responding to this request- there are a lot of questions
I cannot field. I can provide the fixed gen pricing for the building with LF 65%, however all
the other questions center around renewable questions. You will need to take lead on majority.
John McCarthy works in EES and prepares formal responses to inquiries of this nature
If you can help him with those questions, he is very quick at putting the general info needed on Enron
together and putting in a nice binded document with very speedy turnaround
Let me know how you want to proceed- it's due 11/9
thanks
Kq


Start Date: 4/13/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041310.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 10 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/13/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_TOBY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


Tana:

i have a noncommercial futures trading account at lind-waldock. i do
speculatively trade the energy complex.
---------------------- Forwarded by Meriwether Anderson/HOU/EES on 06/06/2001
09:35 AM ---------------------------

Mark Taylor (Vice President and General Counsel)@ENRON
06/05/2001 06:42 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: NYMEX Hedge Exemption List
cc:
Subject: PLEASE READ

To:        Department:   ENA Legal

From:  Mark Taylor     Date: May 11, 2001
  Vice President and General Counsel

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related
commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person
pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/22/2000 01:21 PM -----

	Ken Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	06/22/2000 11:26 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

Mark

I have a commodity futures account that I use to hedge my physical cattle
positions.  If you need more information please let me know.

Ken

	Mark Taylor@ENRON
	Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
	06/21/00 06:39 PM

		 To: All Enron Houston, Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London,
Everyone_in_ECT_Portland, Everyone_in_ECT_New York, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Oslo, Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore, EI-Australia, Buenos Aires
Argentina - Office Staff, Buenos Aires Argentina - TGS Office Staff, Enron
Everyone_EOG_Denver, Enron Everyone_EOG_Calgary
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


Tom,

I appreciate the background on issues with Peter's funding.  I'll be sure not
that we do not incur any expenses as a result of any collaboration.

Catherine Dalton of AEP explained during the course of the meeting that the
AEP/APS proposal (which I will now mail to you) incorporates some features of
earlier drafts of IEEE 1547, which have been expunged in the current working
IEEE draft.  I asked her to characterize what had been expunged and why, and
she only offered that sections had been eliminated in a political process,
since the draft is being finalized on the basis of consensus.  This piqued my
interest, since it's very conceivable that AEP and APS have reinserted issues
that are objectionable from our point of view.  Catherine Dalton made the
point in the meeting that the current IEEE draft has holes that the utilities
believe are necessary to fill.

If you have a copy of the current IEEE draft, I'd appreciate seeing it in
order to compare/contrast with the AEP/APS proposal.  And as I said, I'll
mail a copy of the utility's proposal to you.

Thanks for the help!

	Tom Hoatson
	12/05/2000 01:41 PM

		 To: Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: IEEE Standards For Interconnection

First, as a "heads-up" the DPCA is somewhat in disarray after terminating the
Executive Director and resignation of the Chairman and several members (most
of it caused by retaining an attorney for the California DG proceeding
without getting authorization from the members and then scrambling to figure
out how to pay for it).  Therefore, before working with Peter Chamberlain
make sure that the DPCA is funding him from dues and not an assessment that
we might end up having to pay for (I think Peter may not be retained by DPCA
since the DPCA is restructuring including looking at substantial increase in
dues).  Just be very clear who is paying for Peter and understand our
financial liability before you commence any effort with him (I could be wrong
but I'd rather err on the side of conservancy).

I would be happy to take a look at what AEP/APS are proposing as long as
there's no immediate time frame.  Also, I'm not sure what you mean about
earlier versions of P1547 having sections deleted.  Please clarify.  Thanks.

	Kerry Stroup
	12/05/2000 10:53 AM

		 To: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: IEEE Standards For Interconnection

DG interconnection is the subject of a concerted effort in W Va that
commenced yesterday.  AEP and Allegheny have proposed interconnection
standards that allegedly are based on earlier drafts of IEEE 1547.  Over the
next several weeks, we have the opportunity for input.  Distributed Power
Coalition of America is aggressively involved as well, and will be advocating
its Model Standardized Interconnection Package for Distributed Generation.

Jeff and Tom, I would like to send copies of AEP's?APS's requirements for DG
connection for your review, if you are interested.   Do you know why the
content of earlier versioins of 1547 has been removed (i.e., stuff that has
been reinserted in the utilities' proposals?)

I will be reviewing the materials, and have arranged with Peter Chamberlain
(representing DPCA) to work cooperatively on a response, to the extent our
interests coincide.

	Janine Migden
	12/01/2000 03:26 PM

		 To: Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: IEEE Standards For Interconnection

YEs, I think so.  If the Ohio utilities agree to defer to the IEEE standards
once they are approved, is that good for us?  What is our view on this?
Thanks

	Tom Hoatson
	11/30/2000 09:58 AM

		 To: Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: IEEE Standards For Interconnection

I assume you are referring to the IEEE effort to develop a standard for the
interconnection of distributed resources (IEEE P1547).  I was following this
development but have since reduced my efforts in this area.   The status is
that they are working to get an approved standard released in the 3rd quarter
of 2001.

	Janine Migden
	11/29/2000 04:48 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: IEEE Standards For Interconnection

Is anyone from Enron involved in the IEEE discussions for uniform standards
for interconnection?


Attached is a draft of a joint petition by a direct access user (assumed to be UC/CSU) and direct access provider (ENRON) which was sent earlier today to Susan Mara.  EWD


Mike, as a policy offsites and retreats, especially more exotic and
expensive, are being discouraged.  I would prefer the Galveston offsite and I
don't see a need for more than one per year.  Please manage through PR -
Dorie Hitchcock - she will  require an agenda as part of the approval
process.  I would encourage some significant work discussion to be part of
the offsite.

If you have some concerns lets discuss.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2001
05:02 PM ---------------------------

Michael L Miller@ENRON
01/18/2001 08:32 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENA Principal Investments Outing(s)

Dave,

As part of my ongoing effort to maintain a high level of morale within the
group, I would like to undertake a couple of outings during the first half of
the year.  Given the fact that I now report to you directly and these outings
will involve spending some money, I don't want to commit to anything before
reaching agreement with you on the following:

Weekend offsite in Galveston (at Hotel Galvez) in April.  Group dinner on
Friday, Golf at Galveston Country Club on Saturday morning, meetings and
beach time during afternoon/evening on Saturday, group deep sea fishing
outing on Sunday.  Given that the capacity of the boat exceeds the number of
people in my group, I intend to invite one or more other groups from ENA as a
way of fostering better communications.  Total cost of the entire weekend
should not exceed $15,000.00.

Team building exercise on Mt. Hood (Oregon) in July.  Despite my present
residence in Houston, I previously lived for many years in Europe, including
4+ years in Switzerland.  During this time, I became an avid mountain
climber.  I would like to take as many member of my group as are willing to
climb Mt. Hood (which I have climbed several times - not a huge challenge).
Given Mt. Hood's proximity to Portland, I would of course combine this with
half a day spent with Chris Calger and his group (and may even invite them to
accompany us).  Total cost would be around $450 per person plus
transportation.

I would like to go ahead and finalize arrangements for the above unless you
have strenuous objections.  Please let me know.

MLM


---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 06/14/2000 04:22 PM
---------------------------

Christa Winfrey
06/09/2000 02:08 PM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith
Holst/HOU/ECT@ect, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T Lucci/DEN/ECT@Enron,
Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg
McClendon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carey M Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eva Pao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Tlapek/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E
Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Gas Position Report - Executive Reports Viewer

The Gas Position Report is housed in the Executive Reports Viewer.  In order
for you to view this report, the viewer must be installed on your computer.
Attached is a memo providing instructions on how to install and use the
viewer.

If you have any questions, or problems with installation, please contact me
at ext. 3-9307.

Thank you,

Christa Winfrey
ENA Competitive Analysis & Business Controls


Donna,

Sorry to hear about it. I shall stop by tomorrow  to say hello.
It's too bad: so many good friends of mine will be leaving the comapny.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Donna Dye                           02/28/2000 12:01 PM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: no job

You have probably heard that our group is being broken up. Some people were
put in other groups but I was not fortunate enough to be one of those
people.  HR will try for the month of March to find a position for me within
Enron but that is not likely to happen.

Tomorrow is my last full day here - I will be in and out for the month of
March.

I am informing nice people that I like and you are one of those.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 04/11/2001 09:56 AM
---------------------------

Anna Symes <annasymes@yahoo.com> on 04/11/2001 09:54:14 AM
To: "Kate.Symes@enron.com" <Kate.Symes@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: I thought you might be interested...

  To: Kate.Symes@enron.com
From: Anna Symes

I thought you might be interested in this job.  It's just one of the
more than 250,000 great jobs on Headhunter.net:

  http://www.headhunter.net/share/det.asp?d=J26K66D0YJBB4DWPWJ

Comments:


Nikki:

I am a lawyer with ENA.  I understand that you have been involved with the
execution of the Goldman Sachs & Co. ("GSC")/ECI Corporate Account Agreement,
working with both Cheryl Nelson and Stephanie Panus of ENA.

ENA would like to transfer several accounts to ECI.  In connection therewith,
I am attaching a form of Assignment and Assumption Agreement for that
purpose.  This document is based upon a similar agreement executed by GSC,
ENA and ECT Investments, Inc. on January 22, 2001.

I ask that you please advise me of the following:

(1)  What is the effective date of the Corporate Account Agreement between
ECI and GSC?  Has it been executed by GSC?

(2)  Is the attached form of assignment acceptable?

(3)  Is there anybody else with GSC that needs to be involved with the
review/execution of the attached assignment?

Please let me hear from you.  Our commercial group is extremely anxious to
effectuate the transfer.  Thank you for your assistance.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


I am out of the office  and will be returning Monday, November 26.  If you need immediate assistance with respect to power transactions, please contact Tracy Ngo, Ed Sacks, Wendy Conwell, or Kortney Brown.


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041620.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 20 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Tana when you have a  chance could you do me a favor and go to
www.contractor.com and do a search for  contractor by name then enter my name
and then my company name will come up and  then click on the link to rate
this contractor. Then fill out the form and rate  your favorite contractor
and of course you must give me high  marks.
?
How are you  doing?
?
Louis


The best man at our wedding is coming to stay with us August 15 - 16th - I
know how much he would enjoy meeting/seeing all of you.  Can you all come up
one of those days or it is even ok if you come separately.

Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"


I have received several calls this morning regarding the above, so apparently
there is some doubt.  Please be advised that the executive committee will not
meet today.  Further, due to travel schedules and the holidays, executive
committee meetings will not be held on Monday, December 18 or Monday,
December 25.

Please make note that the next executive committee meeting will be held on
Tuesday, January 2, 2001at 11:00 a.m. in EB50 Boardroom.

Don't hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Regards and Happy Holidays!
Sherri
x3-5984


This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination.

       kelley_doolan@mcgraw-hill.com
       liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com
       prices@intelligencepress.com

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <Peter.F.Keavey@ENRON.com>
To: Dowjones1 (E-mail) <dina.omeara@dowjones.com>, Dowjones2 (E-mail) <john.edmiston@dowjones.com>, Gas Daily (E-mail) <gas_daily@ftenergy.com>, Iferc1 (E-mail) <kelley_doolan@mcgraw-hill.com>, Iferc2 (E-mail) <liane_kucher@mcgraw-hill.com>, NGI (E-mail) <prices@intelligencepress.com>
Date: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:10:30 GMT
Subject:


In order to ensure adequate, consistent legal review of on-line terms and
conditions governing use of third party electronic trading platforms, you
must have all registration documentation (including, for example, password
applications and access agreements) approved by the On-Line Trading Legal
Contact before such documentation is submitted or executed.  Any document
that requires acceptance by &clicking8 should be treated like any other legal
document.  You are not authorized to accept any such click agreement without
written approval of the On-Line Trading Legal Contact.  In addition, the
On-Line Trading Legal Contact must review and approve all product
descriptions and other on-line terms and conditions applicable to a product
before a password may be used to trade that product on a third party
electronic trading platform.  Accordingly, before any master user or subuser
uses a password to trade a product, he or she must confirm that the On-Line
Trading Legal Contact has approved all applicable product descriptions and
terms and conditions applicable to such product.

The current On-Line Trading Legal Contact is Mark Greenberg (extension 58897)
(or in his absence, Mark Taylor (extension 37459)).


I am curious why N70012.Q is a variance in 0001 and N70012.R is not a
variance in 0008.  If you look in the two fred files, 0001 has the liq
flashed and not in the GL, and in 0008 the liquidation is in flash and the
GL.  The counterparties in both are the same.  Jim needs to revise 0001
file.  Shout with any questions.  Thanks.
PL


Thank you for a very successful holiday party.  Debbie and I thoroughly
enjoyed the evening.  Your hard work definitely paid-off for our entire
organization.

I would like to host a lunch for the committee, after the holidays, as a way
of thanking you.   I will have Cindy coordinate your schedules.

Thanks again,
Stan


Start Date: 10/16/01; HourAhead hour: 18;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101618.txt


FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Saunders, James
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 6:11 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Chandler, Bob; Zahn, Gary; McEllin, David; Walters Jr., Harry; Sutton, Lisa
Subject:	FW: Bank Accounts

Rod - fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Chandler, Bob
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 5:38 PM
To:	Saunders, James
Cc:	Zahn, Gary; McEllin, David; Walters Jr., Harry
Subject:	Bank Accounts

Here's the bank accounts list.  I've asked the guys to re-verify the account numbers, but in the meantime, thought you could work with this.