Bob,
I want to thank you for your response time in getting Cody a draft of the
amendment for them to look at this morning. Cody will be out of their
current obligation for this gas on February 11th, I will firm this date up
here
in the next couple of days. Cody has requested that we strike the Gas Daily
Price for gas brought on any day other than the 1st day of the month. This
language is mentioned in Article 2. Contract Price. 2.1 Price. I have called
Darren Farmer on the Texas Desk and explained my situation to him. He
passed on to me that this is not a problem since I will know the date and
volume this package will start flowing to HPLC.  Please e-mail a copy after
these changes for approval to be sent overnight to Cody. Thanks!


FYI - Draft testimony from the EG's supporting the comprehensive settlement.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Beach [mailto:tomb@crossborderenergy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 5:19 PM
To: Tom Lu; Joe Karp; Brian Cherry; 'Joe Paul'; 'Michael Alexander';
Craig Chancellor
Cc: David Dyck; Lad Lorenz; Jeff Dasovich; Mike Day
Subject: Draft Testimony on Why EGs Support the Comprehensive Settlement

Here is the draft of my testimony on why electric generators support the
Comprehensive Settlement.? Note that I have proposed to attach a study that
we did for IEP showing a strong correlation between delivered gas prices to
EGs and PX prices.? I have asked IEP to let me make the study public, and
hope to get their OK tomorrow, at which time I will send that study to those
of you that are not IEP members.

Tom Beach

?
 - EG Testimony for Comprehensive Settlement.xls.doc


I am forwarding you the information of the contact at Heinz who requested a
copy of their ISDA.  Will you please forward her a copy of the ISDA via
overnight mail or fax today.  She has requested a copy by Monday May 21.
Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

Dewann Weltmer
Heinz North America
P.O. Box 57
Pittsburgh, PA  15230-0057

email:  dewann.weltmer@hjheinz.com
Ph:  412-237-3538
Fx:  412-237-3543


1.  We should not terminate.  Sara will call Joel to discuss.

2. If the Raptor process documentation I prepared several months ago (and to
which we all agreed) is being altered, it would be appreciated if the swap
attorneys and Lisa Mellencamp could be a part of discussing changes, and
minimally, be advised of any changes.

Thank you.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Joel Ephross/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/28/2001 09:15 AM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: George McKean/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron Baker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brenda L
Funk/ENRON@enronXgate, Gordon McKillop/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lisa
Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: assignment of trade to Raptor vehicle

I assume that what this e-mail relates to is the discussed "transfer" of the
2 LDC swaps from Raptor 2 to Raptor 4. Frankly, I do not know what it means
to assign a swap from 1 of these vehicles to another vehicle. I think that in
general the schedules to the ISDAs that each of the 2 sets of parties
executed are the same, but what happens in the case of differences? My rather
simplistic approach would be to terminate the existing swaps in Raptor 2 and
execute new swaps at the same time and on the same terms in Raptor 4.

Unless anyone objects, I propose that we proceed along the lines outlined
above, using the Raptor process documentation developed by Lisa and recently
updated by Gordon.

We recently [like yesterday] received closing books on Raptor 3 and
distributed those. If Anyone needs documentation on the other 3 structures,
let us know....[Realizing that they are about to change due to the planned
merger of Raptor 1, 2 and 4 into Mega-Raptor -- sounds like a bad Rug-Rats
movie I recently had the misfortune of viewing doesn't it?]
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Cook, Mary
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 8:29 AM
To: Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Ephross, Joel
Subject: Re: assignment of trade to Raptor vehicle

No.  I guess the first step is to know into which Raptor the swaps are moving
and to get Joel to give us a closing book on that Raptor so we can get the
correct parties etc.  Attached is an assignment/assumption document I drafted
for the VPP transaction which might be helpful (of course, it has a lot of
inapplicable specifics) .    We ought to also check with Joel about any
provisions in the rest of the vehicle docs that may apply to an assignment.
I would think that if all parties join and consent and provide no ED or TE
under the ISDAs shall occur on the basis of the assignment that it would be
clean from the ISDA point of view.  Mary

 << File: assignment Brazos Pres 2.doc >>

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton 02/28/2001 08:21 AM 	   To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:
Subject: assignment of trade to Raptor vehicle

Mary:

Do you have a form of "approved" assignment for transferring trades into the
Raptor vehicle?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


John,

A couple of thoughts to follow on from yesterday.

If your prime motivation in completing shutting down the merchant power
effort versus turning it down is to send a strong signal to the government,
then I believe the message will be undermined by Enron's continued efforts
through EPower.  In order to be most effective and show commitment to the
"message" strategy then it would be consistent to shutdown the efforts of
EPower (something none of us believes makes sense).  While METI would
understand that EJ reducing its efforts is significant, they will breathe a
sigh of relief that Enron is not pulling out of power since EPower efforts
are continuing.  As many in the market still believe that EPower will be
marketing and retailing power as well as building power plants, it will look
as though not much has changed regarding Enron.  In fact, many of the other
new entrants, Marubeni, Ennet, Nippon Steel, etc have indicated to us that
they will reduce efforts now and look to the future for further change (in
effect exactly what we are talking about doing).  Many of these companies are
looking at building 100 Mw stations that could be available in the next 12-18
months.  METI is undoubtedly aware of this and is working to bring pressure
on the utes and further development to the market structure as soon as they
are able (timing uncertain).  In summary, I believe that you would be able to
send the same message through reducing EJ's efforts down to a slow boil, but
allow us to keep abreast of what is going on and pushing initiatives in the
12-18 month range (Ahlstom initiatives, Ennet merchant power plant financing
proposal, etc.).  Imagine EJ commercial team of approx 2 with some percentage
of senior commercial oversight.  While not a prime motivating factor, having
a small team working this effort will also allow us to manage the existing
relationships with the customers.  As an aside, Air Liquide told us that they
had been warned by their people in the US that Enron often backs out of deals
at the last minute.  I don't bring this up as a reason to do an uneconomic
deal, but just to give an indication of the relationship factor.  Backing out
of this deal and reducing our power efforts are the right things to do.

You also mentioned that if Enron wanted to look at the 12-18 month type
projects then we could accomplish this through EPower.  Based on the midterm
deals that we have reviewed to date, I think successful accomplishment here
is unlikely.  I think that you have been made aware of most of these issues.
If EPower was operating in isolation, then these projects would be continuing
without any real insight on the commodity value/risk proposition.  I believe
that we have agreed on this point before and that value delivered for these
types of projects is effectively 85% EJ/15% EPower.

On your suggestion of leaving this as a draft, I believe this makes real
sense.  Also I'd like to make the announcement formal on 7 May.  Next week is
a holiday week in Japan and therefore very few people will be here.  Also I
imagine that Morten Erik should likely have made a decision by then so the
note can be adjusted accordingly.  This will help with the Japanese staff as
they will have a much better idea of what the future will look like.
Jonathan's toing and froing a couple of months ago caused a great deal of
anxiety amongst the staff up until he was ready to give formal notification.

I have also made a couple of comments or suggestions below as well.  I hope
this has been helpful.

regards,

Joe

Joseph P. Hirl
Enron Japan Corp.
81 3 5219 4500
81 3 5219 4510 (Fax)
www.enron.co.jp

	John Sherriff@ECT
	04/24/2001 02:55 PM

		 To: (713) 529-7757, Ken Rice/Enron Communications, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Jeremy
Thirsk/AP/Enron@ENRON, Morten E Pettersen/AP/Enron@Enron, Nicholas
O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/Enron@EnronXGate, Raymond
Bowen/enron@enronxgate, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Carey
Sloan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian Stanley/EU/Enron, Michael R
Brown/LON/ECT, Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT, Ted
Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew C Lynch/LON/ECT, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, lkitchen@enron.co.uk
		 cc:
		 Subject: Draft Organizational Announcement about Japan

May I please have your comments if any on this draft by close of business
Wednesday.  We hope to have agreed on the Q&A's by then and to send it out
the announcement on Thursday.

John

To be sent to:  All Enron Europe, all employees in Japan,  all Global Markets
and all VPs and up around the company

Enron has established several wholesale businesses in Japan in the last year
including Metals,  Power marketing, Power Plant Development (via our
investment in EnCom),  Coal,  LNG & Weather.   While we have been able to
close power transactions and there is real interest from customers for
Enron-type power solutions, Japan has not yet removed some significant
barriers to make progress towards a full scale liberalized electricity
market.  The regulators and key politicians are very much in favor of further
liberalization and the benefits this would provide, but the timing in
uncertain.  Until further tangible steps are taken to improve third party
access for electricity in Japan, we will significantly reduce our power
marketing efforts and focus on the significant opportunities that currently
exist in our other wholesale businesses.   Once the necessary regulatory
changes have been completed we expect to aggressively pursue Enron's
traditional position as the leading buyer and seller of electricity in every
deregulated market.

Based on these changes Joe Hirl our President of Enron Japan will move to the
Global Markets group and lead a team made up of Enron Japan staff that will
focus on developing all our Global Markets opportunities in Japan especially
Weather,  Oil,  LNG,  Coal, and Shipping.    We expect to continue our
general recruiting  of Japanese nationals and as President of Enron Japan,
Joe will continue to provide the overall business leadership for Enron Japan
and this will also include recruiting and the Analyst and Associate program
in Japan.  The Finance origination team headed by Jeremy Thirsk will continue
to report to Joe and also move to Global Markets.  Morten Erik Pettersen is
still evaluating possibilities inside and outside of Japan and will decide
shortly on his direction. (if we make this announcement on 7 May as suggested
above, then we can make the previous sentence more precise)  The
Equity/FX/Interest rate team which is a part of Global Markets has two
employees in the Tokyo office today and they expect to expand their efforts
throughout the year.

The EnCom group, which is our power plant development business (with minority
partners) and headed by Carey Sloan will continue its efforts in developing
power plants in Japan.  We are pleased with the progress we are making on a
number of sites and EnCom will continue to report to the Enron Europe Office
of the Chairman.

Our Metals team headed by Kazunari Sugimoto will continue to report through
Enron Metals in London.

By May we expect Enron Credit to have two to three employees in Tokyo pursing
the Credit Derivative business.  These employees remain in  Enron Credit , a
part of Enron Europe.

EBS has two employees headed by Jim Weisser and this team expects to expand
by year end.

The Industrial Markets team also expects to have two employees in the Tokyo
office in the next couple of months.

In the last seven months the commercial support services for Japan have been
transitioned to London for support and this is not changing.  Jane McBride
heads the legal team and will continue to functionally report  to Mark Evans,
General Counsel in London.   The RAC function will continue to report to Ted
Murphy, head of RAC for Enron Europe.   The Risk Management and Accounting
team is headed by Jan-Erland Bekeng will continue to functionally report to
Fernley Dyson in London.  The  IT, HR,  Tax and real estate teams will also
continue to functionally report to London.

Nick O'Day who heads both the Public Affairs group (Government & Regulatory
Affairs and the Public Relations) in Japan will report to the Enron Europe
Office of the Chair with a Public Relations functional reporting to Jackie
Genle in London and a Government Affairs functional reporting to Rick
Shappiro in Houston.   We anticipate that his team's efforts will be
primarily directed to supporting the EnCom power plant development team but
he will also continue to provide support for Global Markets, EBS & Industrial
Markets.

We have already made considerable progress in breaking into the Japanese
markets across a wide range of Enron businesses and we anticipate that this
will be a major profit center for profit growth for years to come. Through
these current changes we can demonstrate our ability to be flexible and
target our resources where they will realise the most immediate value for the
company.


SCIENTECH's IssueAlert
Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:
[IMAGE]  SCIENTECH is currently interviewing 1,500 utilities on CIS/CRM and customer care in the United States and Canada to determine:      The leading software providers  Drivers of utility technology decisions  Analysis of license sales versus ASP sales  New market opportunities  Growing/shrinking software markets    Download a sample prospectus for an introduction to this new survey at: http://secure.scientech.com/specialpages/Multi_Client.asp  and  contact Jon Brock at 505-244-7607 for more details.
[IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]   Electric Power System & Natural Gas System Maps are available from SCIENTECH, Inc.  Click here for full descriptions and prices of Electric   and Gas  Maps.

[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
October 26, 2001
Conectiv Completes Nuclear Plant Sales
By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]
[News item from PR Newswire] Conectiv (NYSE: CIV), an energy provider located in the Mid-Atlantic, announced that its wholly owned subsidiary, Atlantic City Electric Company, completed the sale of its ownership interests in three nuclear plants to PSEG Nuclear LLC and Exelon Generation Company. The ownership interests were sold for approximately $11.3 million, excluding reimbursement of estimated fuel inventory, subject to adjustment.
Analysis: This announcement from Conectiv came out late last week, but I did not want to miss the opportunity to provide some analytical commentary on what I think is a rather significant development. The transfer of ownership in the three nuclear plants included in this transaction is significant because of its relation to Conectiv's unique competitive strategy and the round-robin way in which nuclear assets are changing hands in the United States. Further, despite an increase in acquisition activity around the nation's nuclear facilities, we still are seeing only a small number of companies that actually own or control nuclear power in the United States.
The divestiture of the nuclear assets includes only what is Conectiv's ownership in the plants, which Conectiv shares with other companies (who also happen to be the buying partners in this sale). The breakdown of the sale of nuclear assets is as follows:
A 7.51-percent interest (164 MW) in the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3 sold in equal shares to co-owners PSEG Nuclear and Exelon. Prior to the transaction, PSEG Nuclear, an indirect subsidiary of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated, and Exelon each owned about 46 percent of the Peach Bottom plant. Exelon is the operator of the Peach Bottom facility.

A 7.41-percent interest (167 MW) in the Salem Nuclear Generation Station Units 1 and 2 was sold to PSEG Nuclear, which prior to the sale owned about 50 percent of the facility. PSEG Nuclear will remain the operator of the plant.

A 5-percent interest (52 MW) in the Hope Creek Nuclear Generation Station Units 1 and 2 was sold to PSEG Nuclear, which is the operator of the plant and prior to the sale owned 95 percent of the facility.

As noted, the significance of these transactions relates to Conectiv's competitive strategy and the consolidation that is taking place in the nuclear sector. Let's look at Conectiv first.
According to Conectiv's President and COO Thomas Shaw, the divestiture of the nuclear assets is consistent with the company's focused business strategy on two core energy businesses: Conectiv Energy, the company's integrated generation and asset optimization group, and Conectiv Power Delivery, the company's regulated delivery business. To support this two-tiered focus, Conectiv has been in the process of divesting its baseload generating plants to expand a generation portfolio that includes only mid-merit plants (units that have more flexibility to follow demand patterns). Mid-merit plants are often viewed as units that fill the operating space between baseload plants and peaker units. Whereas a baseload unit may have a generating capacity factor of about 80 percent, a mid-merit unit may have a generating capacity factor of about 30 percent to 55 percent. From Conectiv's perspective, the value of the mid-merit strategy is that these plants can be reserved to operate only when demand is comparatively high. Further, the company believes that mid-merit units are ideally suited to support the company's energy trading and asset optimization strategy because they are flexible enough to provide fuel arbitrage opportunities and ancillary service support when they are not needed to meet higher demands for power.
The sale of the nuclear assets follows the previous sale of 1,081 MW of baseload generating capacity by Delmarva Power & Light, a subsidiary of Conectiv, to NRG Energy and the divestiture of Conectiv's telecommunications business (Conectiv Communications) to Cavalier Telephone of Richmond, Va., for $20 million. In addition, Conectiv sold its 50-percent stake in a 118-MW co-generation facility in New Jersey to Pedricktown Cogeneration LP, a non-utility electric generator, for $9 million.
Conectiv is divesting all of its baseload generation but has maintained ownership of some 2,000 MW of mid-merit generation in the Mid-Atlantic region. The proceeds from the coal plant sales to NRG will reportedly be used to repay debt and fund Conectiv's development of additional mid-merit assets. Conectiv's immediate goal is to build more than 4,000 MW of mid-merit power generation within the Mid-Atlantic region by 2004. Toward that end, Conectiv is taking some of the proceeds from the NRG transaction and using the money to support a $300-million, 500-MW expansion of its Hay Road Generating Station, which is currently a 516-MW plant that is primarily fueled by natural gas.
The divestiture of both the telecommunications business and the baseload generation supports Conectiv's strategy of re-focusing on its core businesses, which are power trading and wholesale marketing (through mid-merit units only) and a regulated delivery business. Conectiv Power Delivery provides energy service to more than one million customers in New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia. Given the fairly distinct line between Conectiv's regulated and unregulated businesses, I have previously speculated that Conectiv could be preparing to spin off its unregulated businesses into a stand-alone company (a trend represented by AEP, Reliant and UtiliCorp). Conectiv is in the midst of major restructuring, so it is unlikely that any such spin off of its generation business would take place in the near term. However, as far as I know, Conectiv is the only energy company that has focused exclusively on mid-merit plants.
Conectiv is also involved in merger proceedings with Pepco, a partnership that is scheduled to close in April 2002.  In this deal, Pepco is acquiring Conectiv for a combination of cash and stock valued at $2.2 billion. Both companies will become subsidiaries of a new holding company to be named at a later date. The partnership between these two relatively small and regionally based utility companies reportedly will create the largest electricity delivery company in the Mid-Atlantic region. By combining their two electricity delivery businesses, Pepco and Conectiv reportedly will more than double their customer base and expand their service territory by nine times.
In the nuclear sector, it is not terribly surprising that Exelon and PSEG Nuclear would be the buying partners in the three nuclear plants sold by Conectiv (despite the obvious fact that these companies already maintained majority ownership in the plants). Exelon and PSEG Nuclear are two of what is a small number of companies that are actively involved in the nuclear-power space, and thus it is not surprising that they would be involved in the license exchange on these three plants. Exelon has the largest nuclear fleet in the nation and still outpaces most of the competition in the nuclear industry, owning a total of 17 reactors. Earlier this year, Exelon CEO Corbin McNeill said he thought that a new nuclear plant would definitely be built in the next five years, and did not rule out the fact that his company might be the one to drive the construction of the new nuclear facility.
As noted, PSEG Nuclear is an indirect subsidiary of the Public Service Enterprise Group Inc., which in 2000 was split into PSE&G, a regulated gas and electric delivery company in New Jersey and PSEG Power, an unregulated U.S. power generation company. As noted, PSEG Nuclear LLC operates the Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Stations in Lower Alloways Creek, N.J., and oversees PSEG Power's ownership interest in the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, located in Delta, Pa. When the Conectiv transaction is completed, PSEG Power will own 100 percent of Hope Creek, 52 percent of Salem, and 50 percent of Peach Bottom.
In addition to Exelon and PSEG Nuclear, Entergy Corp. is another company that deserves a mention when discussing the nuclear sector. Since 1999, Entergy has been an active bidder on most every nuclear plant that has come onto the auction block. Recently, Entergy bought Con Edison's Indian Point Units 1 and 2 nuclear power plants in Westchester County, N.Y. In addition, Entergy recently announced an agreement with the Vermont Yankee Power Corporation to purchase the 501-MW Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in Vernon, Vt., for $180 million. With the completion of the Vermont Yankee sale, Entergy will own a nuclear fleet that includes 10 reactors. Also note that the  New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) just approved the sale of Niagara Mohawk's Nine Mile nuclear generating station to Constellation Nuclear for about $780 million. The purchase prices for the 614-MW Nine Mile 1 and 82 percent of the 1,142-MW Nine Mile 2 are about $221 million and $559 million, respectively. Constellation is another company that has consistently increased its nuclear power assets.
Given the volatility of natural gas prices and the high emissions associated with coal-fired generation, many industry analysts have debated whether or not nuclear power is on the brink of resurgence.  Exelon, for example, is involved in a joint venture that is attempting to commercialize a new nuclear technology called Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR).  Supporters of PBMR believe its relatively small size (110 MW), anticipated short construction time (24 months) and cost ($1,000/kW) can once again make nuclear power an acceptable option.  In February of 2001, Exelon filed an application with the U.S. nuclear energy regulators to license a similar reactor in the United States.  Clearly, steps are being taken to revive this controversial industry.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available atwww.scientech.com

We encourage our readers to contact us with their comments.  We look forward to hearing from you. Nancy Spring    Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Jane Pelz   at 505.244.7650. Advertising opportunities are also available on our Website.
  Our staff is comprised of leading energy experts with diverse  backgrounds in utility generation, transmission & distribution,  retail markets, new technologies, I/T, renewable energy, regulatory affairs,  community relations and international issues. Contact consulting@scientech.com   or call Nancy Spring at 505.244.7613.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this e-mail and include  their full name and e-mail address or register directly on our site.    If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, and you are currently a registered subscriber to IssueAlert via SCIENTECH's website,  please visit  http://secure.scientech.com/account/  to unsubscribe.  Otherwise, please send an e-mail to  to IssueAlert , with "Delete IA Subscription" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.     Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Jones, Tana
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:31 PM
To:	'anthonydensieski@nymex.com'
Cc:	Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	NYMEX Compliance Contacts at Enron North America

Per our conversation last week, please ensure that Mark Taylor and I are your initial point of contact with respect to compliance with and/or violations by Enron North America Corp. with respect to NYMEX position limits.  Please fax Mark Taylor a copy of any correspondence with respect to our position limits.  Your assistance with this will help us monitor and maintain Enron's compliance with NYMEX rules. In addition, if you are able to give us a call when you see an issue ahead, we may well be able to resolve it before it becomes a problem.

As you requested, below is the contact information for Mark and myself:

Mark E. Taylor
Vice President and General Counsel
Telephone:  (713) 853-7459
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  mark.taylor@enron.com

Tana L. Jones
Sr. Legal Specialist
Telephone:  (713) 853-3399
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  tana.jones@enron.com


PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL--THIS ACCOUNT IS NOT MONITORED

AP User:

Attached is/are the payment proposal(s) for your business unit.  Please review and forward to your approver(s)/CAO.

Thank you.
SAP AP Team
 - 20020110-DENWC.XLS


I'm going to go ahead and send it to her.


Tana,

I reviewed the mutual NDA document and made minor changes.  Here is my
version and the comparerite version showing the differences.  Please let me
know if you are okay with these changes.  (703) 259-2323

lisa

 - CYSIVE RED.doc
 - cysive2.doc


_________________________________________________________________

                        F O O L W A T C H
                     Tuesday, October 10, 2000

benjamin.rogers@enron.com
_________________________________________________________________

REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150700
_________________________________________________________________

                     Close    Change  %Change

        NOW 50     1,847.74   -16.21   -0.87%
        DJIA      10,524.40   -44.03   -0.42%
        S&P 500    1,387.02   -15.01   -1.07%
        NASDAQ     3,240.54  -115.02   -3.43%
        (Numbers as of 5:00 p.m. ET)

 SPONSORED BY: CompuBank
 Open an account with CompuBank and get $20 deposited into
      your account AND a FREE 6-month subscription to the Motley
      Fool Internet Report ($60 value). Apply NOW!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=150701

FOOL ON THE HILL: GREAT COMPANY, BAD STOCK
  Even if a company's business outperforms, its stock can still
  underperform.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150702

NEWS: AFTER HOURS STORIES
  Late breaking news on Yahoo!, Lucent, and Motorola.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150703

FOOL'S DEN: INTRO TO &ACCRETIVE TO EARNINGS8
  Merger announcements often boast that a deal is &accretive8 to
  earnings. What exactly does that mean?
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150704

LAST DAY TO ENROLL!
  Sign up ends Wednesday night for the Biotech Investing Online
  Seminar. Don't miss out on the chance to learn from experts.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150705

RULE BREAKER: AFFYMETRIX TARGETS GENOMICS
  Affymetrix has cornered the biochip market. But its recent move
  into genomics shows the company has broader horizons.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150706

RULE MAKER: NOKIA'S PRICE IS RIGHT
  One Fool advocates filling Gap's spot in our portfolio with
  more shares of Nokia.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150707

QUICKNEWS
  Get the latest on Infosys, Connectis, and Williams-Sonoma.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150708

WHAT'S YOUR FAVORITE CHARITY?
  Convince us that your favorite non-profit group is truly Foolish
  and it could be part of Foolanthropy 2000.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150709

DRIP PORT: DOLLAR COST AVERAGING IN A DOWN MARKET
  When the market slumps, don't let falling stock prices distract
  you from a company's true value. Play the averages.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150710

FOOLISH FOUR: ASK A FOOL
  Two Fools provide sound advice on handling &hot8 stock tips and
  income tax refunds.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150711

WORKSHOP: EVALUATING RETURN AGAINST RISK
  The Sharpe Ratio can help you make investment decisions by
  calculating the potential return for the assumed risk.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150712

FOOL PLATE: ABBOTT LABS ENDURES
  Abbott has taken some big shots in the last year,
  but it has withstood them well.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150713

HOT TOPICS: WHAT FOOLS ARE TALKING ABOUT
  Fools are talking about:  RealNetworks, Yahoo! and Celera.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150714

FRIBBLE: AFTER THE RECESSION
  One reader offers a unique -- to say the least -- perspective
  on the future of Amazon.com shares.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150715

BREAKFAST WITH THE FOOL: APPLE JUICED
  Apple,s chief sales executive retires. So do investors.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150716

_________________________________________________________________

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150717
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150718
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150719
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150720
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150721

 SPONSORED BY: CompuBank
 Open an account with CompuBank and get $20 deposited into
      your account AND a FREE 6-month subscription to the Motley
      Fool Internet Report ($60 value). Apply NOW!
 http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=150722

LAST DAY TO ENROLL!
 Sign up ends Wednesday night for our Biotech Investing
 Online Seminar. 100% satisfaction guaranteed.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150723

BECOME A FOOL!
 Get a FREE Investing Guide and more...
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150724

FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
 Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
 can also temporarily suspend mail delivery.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com

 Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
 e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=150725

_________________________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.

MsgId: msg-18855-B10107526Address.msg-19:08:08(10-10-2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: benjamin.rogers@enron.com


Jeff:

Sorry for the delay - I'm still trying to track this down.  Obviously I don't
know the answer right off and no one I've asked so far knows for sure
(although those who know a little something about the area don't think it
looks good).  I hope to have a final answer for you early next week.

Mark

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Series 7

Did you get my previous email regarding transfer of my SFA status to the US?
Pls let me know the status.


FYI, see the new legislation section for a summary of the transfer pricing
resolution.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/11/99 08:50 AM ---------------------------

bulletin.MNA@mna.com.ar on 01/11/99 08:56:49 PM
To: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: MNA "Energy & Mining Bulletin"  Issue 22

 - Issue 22.doc


Dear Ken,

First of all we thank you for meeting with us and attewnding the Board of
Trustees meeting in late May.  We also thank you for following up with Tim
Wirth on the Turner Foundations's interest in supporting a Heinz Center
Global Change Program.  We appreciate your interest and support in the
Center.

The purpose of this email is to give you advance notice that you will be
invited to a DOC/DOE Energy Roundtable entitled "The Critical Role of New
Environmental Information and Technology in the National Energy Strategy"
to be held on July 17 in Washington, DC.  From the draft agenda that we
have, I am uncertain about attendees, purpose, goals etc. You will be
invited to speak on "Trading nd Risk Management Issues."  If you do attend,
we would love to meet with you.  If Linda joins you, I would enjoy going to
tea, white gloves and all, with Linda.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

As always, Mary Hope.


Gerald-

I have the Lost Creek Members Meeting tomorrow.  What's your schedule later
in the week?  Are we busy people, or what?

Take Care,

Audrey


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kam Keiser                           12/27/2000 10:40 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: desk level summaries

could you please forward this to your intra-month book admins.
Thanks

The OA group has had many problems in the past with our desk level summaries
and the break-outs between our books.  Some of the short names get cut off
and it is hard to tell exactly what books they belong to.  Could you please
make sure that the values are input on the correct lines, that there is only
one line per desk and that there are no numbers without a desk assigned to
them.  Some of the problems they have run into with SAP and the "seller
rules" is that if both desks do not show the same numbers the seller side is
assumed to be correct which throws off the other side and gives them an
adjustment for the desk to take which isn't always correct.

Here is a list of the desks that are most often misused.

ECT-ENA - IM CE  central desk
ECT-ENA - IM MI  central desk
ECT-ENA - IM MK  central desk
ECT-ENA - IM MA  market east deak
ECT-ENA - IM SI  sithe desk
ECT-EMW - IM MI  enron midwest desk

Please pay special attention to your numbers this month.  Getting this
corrected up front will take care of a lot of work in the future.
Please ask me if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Kam


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001
03:30 PM ---------------------------

"George Richards" <cbpres@austin.rr.com> on 02/21/2001 06:32:15 AM
Please respond to <cbpres@austin.rr.com>
To: "Phillip Allen" <pallen@enron.com>
cc: "Larry Lewter" <LLEWTER@austin.rr.com>
Subject: SM134 Proforma2.xls

There have been some updates to the cost.  The principal change is in the
addition of masonry on the front of the buildings, which I estimate will
costs at least $84,000 additional.  Also, the trim material and labor costs
have been increased.  I still believe that the total cost is more than
sufficient, but there will be additional updates.

The manager's unit is columns J-L, but the total is not included in the B&N
total of rentable units.  Rather, the total cost for the manager's unit and
office is included as a lump sum under amenities.  I may add this back in as
a rentable unit and delete is as an amenity.

The financing cost has been changed in that the cost of the permanent
mortgage has been deleted because we will not need to obtain this for the
construction loan approval, therefore, its cost will be absorbed when this
loan is obtained.

Based on either a loan equal to 75% of value or 80% of cost, the
construction profit should cover any equity required beyond the land.

George W. Richards
Creekside Builders, LLC

 - SM134 Proforma2.xls


Thanks!  Also, I'm forwarding this to Michelle.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron on 07/19/2000
02:50 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Toby Kuehl                           07/19/2000 01:41 PM

To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: interactive open season test packages

Oops! forgot you on the list!
---------------------- Forwarded by Toby Kuehl/ET&S/Enron on 07/19/2000 01:42
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Toby Kuehl                           07/19/2000 01:40 PM

To: Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Richard Abramowicz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Girish Kaimal/OTS/Enron@ENRON,
Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: interactive open season test packages

Does your testing seem to be going ok?  I haven't heard from anyone yet.

Let Rich or myself know....

Toby

Richard Abramowicz
07/19/2000 08:27 AM
To:  Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Girish
Kaimal/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: interactive open season test packages

The interactive open season test packages are loaded on ios.ets.enron.com.
We put in the change where shippers must bid on the full capacity of the
package, no partial capacities are allowed.  Even though the package with the
3 month term has been loaded, we can remove it if we need to.  The following
test user have been set up for testing.

user id  password package 15 volume package 16 volume

test1  user1  20000   0
test2  user2  20000   0
test3  user3  20000   0
test4  user4  20000   0
test5  user5  20000   49000
test6  user6  20000   49000
test7  user7  0   49000
test8  user8  0   49000
test9  user9  0   49000
test10  user10  0   49000

This iosadmin password is k97hyt86

Because the ios application hasn't been thoroughly used since February of
1999, it is very important to do this testing.  I you need us to reset the
bids or the end time, or if you notice any problems while testing, please
page us at (877)497-3254.


gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 12:08 PM -----

	Richard Shapiro 02/09/2001 11:41 AM 	   To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron  cc:   Subject: Fwd: 01-238.pdf

Please forward to entire California distribution list. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 11:45 AM ---------------------------

"JAMES L. HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM> on 02/09/2001 12:43:00 PM
To:	rshapiro@enron.com
cc:

Subject:	Fwd: 01-238.pdf

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from 10.4.218.11 by securemail1b.llgm.com with SMTP ( Tumbleweed MMS SMTP Relay (MMS v4.7)); Fri, 09 Feb 2001 12:14:38 -0500
X-Server-Uuid: 2ddd99fc-ca0e-11d4-9906-00508bdcbe76
Received: from HEADQUARTERS#032#NEW#032#YORK-Message_Server by LLGM.COM with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 09 Feb 2001 12:14:18 -0500
Message-ID: <sa83df1a.084@LLGM.COM>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.2.1
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 13:13:47 -0500
From: "JAMES L. HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM>
To: mary.hain@enron.com,	rick.shapiro@enron.com,	"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
Subject: 01-238.pdf
X-WSS-ID: 169AFAF4312809-01-01
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;  boundary="=_A6FD155C.58393570"

 http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caed/documents.nsf/84e64649a296def7882568fc0076ab18/f8f79306e87b8db3882569ed007d1c31/$FILE/01-238.pdf

 - 01-238pd.url


Guess Who???  Its back on my desk.  How do you feel about doing a manual
invoice?  That will be the only way to get it out quickly at this point.

Judy Townsend
12/22/2000 11:37 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 11/2000 Oglethorpe

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT on 12/22/2000 11:30
AM ---------------------------

Darla Saucier@ENRON
12/21/2000 01:50 PM
To: Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam B
Boxx/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: 11/2000 Oglethorpe

Hi Judy,

I spoke with Chris Germany yesterday and he said that you were going to take
care of fixing the Oglethorpe deal.  An unhappy Doug Jones from Oglethorpe
called me yesterday.  He is wanting to get the corrected invoice ASAP so he
can have the wire to us before year end.  If he doesn't get the invoice
today, he will not pay us until after the first of the year.

Please let me know when to expect the changes to come across so I can forcast
the cash receipt in our system for treasury and also let Doug know when the
invoice will be faxed over to him.

Thanks to everyone involved for all of your help.  Merry Christmas!

Darla


* CA Senate passed SBX1 43 today
---------------------- Forwarded by Edward Hamb/HOU/EES on 03/13/2001 11:59
AM ---------------------------

James M Wood
03/12/2001 05:38 PM
To: ehamb@enron.com
cc:
Subject: NEWS:  Legislation for 6.5 cent bill

is it a rate freeze or the rate ceiling
---------------------- Forwarded by James M Wood/HOU/EES on 03/12/2001 05:37
PM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Jennifer Rudolph                           03/12/2001 10:01 AM

To: CA Team
cc:
Subject: NEWS:  Legislation for 6.5 cent bill

*  from Utility Risk Management

---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES on 03/12/2001
10:00 AM ---------------------------

Tamara Johnson
03/12/2001 09:54 AM

I found out late Friday that the bill passed out of the Senate on Thursday
and went to the Assembly for a vote.
By putting a cap on all customers served by SDG&E, the government is
essentially putting customers of all three IOU's on the same footing, which
allows for a common surcharge to be levied on all the customers.  The 6.5
cent ceiling is comparable to the frozen rates of SCE and PG&E plus the 1cent
surcharge levied in January.

Here's the analysis that is put out at the Senate...

Here's the bill itself...

Rosalinda Tijerina
03/12/2001 09:41 AM
To: Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: NEWS: 6.5 cent bill passes Senate

---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalinda Tijerina/HOU/EES on 03/12/2001
09:41 AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/10/2001 12:03 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@EES, Beverly
Aden/HOU/EES@EES, Bill Votaw/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda Barreda/HOU/EES@EES, Carol
Moffett/HOU/EES@EES, Cathy Corbin/HOU/EES@EES, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Liscano/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Dan
Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Debora Whitehead/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Douglas
Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES,
Erika Dupre/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Fran Deltoro/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gordon
Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, James Wright/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Bass/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Gustafson/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES,
Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES, Leticia Botello/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S
Muller/HOU/EES@EES, Marsha Suggs/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES,
Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Mann/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paula
Warren/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Hennessy/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Rosalinda
Tijerina/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Sharon Dick/HOU/EES@EES, skean@enron.com, Tanya Leslie/HOU/EES@EES, Tasha
Lair/HOU/EES@EES, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Greenlee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, triley@enron.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Wright/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Dirk vanUlden/Western
Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange, Steve Walker/SFO/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, wgang@enron.com, Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>,
Hedy Govenar <hgovenar@govadv.com> @ ENRON, jklauber@llgm.com, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: NEWS: 6.5 cent bill passes Senate

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/10/2001 12:09 PM -----

	Jennifer Rudolph@EES
	03/08/2001 03:31 PM

		 To: CA Team
		 cc:
		 Subject: NEWS: 6.5 cent bill passes Senate

* CA Senate passed SBX1 43 today
* Now, the bill goes to the Assembly
* Looking for article...
* More to come


I spoke to Don Shindler about your comments.  We will hold the contract and
any discussions with the Seller's attorney pending your approval following
discussions with your Accounting Department.  As per Rusty's email, we will
provide for a 12 month post-expiration/termination extended triggering
period.  As to the specific performance issue, we have agreed to this in the
past after the exercise of the option in the event the ENA entity was in
default of its obligation to acquire the property.  The alternative seems to
be to provide for some additional payment as liquidated damages for a
failure to close over and above the option consideration.  Re:  the zoning
issue.  Fred:  if there is any thought to using the Fehr property as a
laydown construction site or other use, we will need to address this issue.
Let's discuss.  Please let us know how you would like us to handle this.  To
discuss, please call me or Don.  Thanks.

Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email:  karen.way@piperrudnick.com
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [SMTP:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 3:50 PM
> To: Rusty.Stevens@enron.com
> Cc: karen.way@piperrudnick.com; Fred.Mitro@enron.com
> Subject: Re: Fehr Option Agreement
>
>
> Here are my observations:
>
> I agree with Rusty re: the put option complicating things for us.  Second,
> there has to be an absolute end to this agreement at some point. If we
> want
> to have an automatic extension by commencing construction, there still
> needs to be a date certain after which we can go forward without them no
> matter what.  In other words, if we want to add the language Rusty
> suggested, it should be limited to x months after the expiration of the
> option agreement.  We'll need to run this back through Accounting.
>
> I really don't like the inclusion of the language in paragraph 5. If we
> add
> the language requested in paragraph 5, we need to run this agreement back
> through Accounting, and we may need to add some other additional language.
>
> I don't know if Rusty and Fred think we may need a zoning change for this
> parcel.
>
> Kay
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rusty Stevens
> 09/14/2000 04:45 PM
>
> To:   karen.way@piperrudnick.com, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
> cc:   Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT
>
> Subject:  Fehr Option Agreement
>
> I am in receipt of the Fehr's comments to our option agreement.  In
> reviewing them, I have the following comments:
>
>    The paragraph (2) change that says they can compel us to buy their land
>    upon a Triggering Event occurring is not going to work, because this is
>    a put option on their part which hurts our hard cost avoidance issues.
>    We carefully reworded previous put option language to avoid this.
>    Also, how can we be bound to a deal when the agreement has expired ?  I
>    think we would need to say that "if we decide to build the plant after
>    the option period expires, then that would serve to extend the term of
>    this agreement, however, if the option agreement expires unexercised
> for
>    a one year period then we won't be bound to the deal.
>
>    If the provisions of his comment (5) are indeed parallel to another
>    similar paragraph in the document I don't have a problem with it, but
>    "specific performance" scares me in general.  Your (collective) call.
>
>
> Lets wrap this one up fast.  I want to resolve it soon so I can use it as
> leverage with Ledford and not have him influence them.  He picked a good
> to
> go on vacation, but is back in on Monday.  I also told the Fehr's that if
> we could do this before the 15th I would go for $185,000 vs. $175,000.
> Since we were about five days longer than promised, I can justify the
> delay
> to end of next week, but I don't want them to think I was just blowing
> smoke on the extra $10,000.
>
>
> Fred :  Refresh my memory on who I need to go to for the option payment
> check ?
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


Ken -- the process description (i.e. where Brown could play a key role) is discussed in the middle of the update document.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:47 PM
To:	Fleming, Rosalee; Kean, Steven J.
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Materials in Advance of Call with Mayor Brown

Rosalee:

Attached are the materials that Steve asked me to send you to forward to Mr. Lay.  Thanks very much for your help.

Best,
Jeff


To be clear, that is 10:30am New York time

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Kimmel, Debra [FI]
> Sent:	Friday, January 04, 2002 5:21 PM
> To:	Flood, Scott L [GCO]; Stuckey, Richard A [FI]; Casaudoumecq, John
> [FI]; 'Kitchen, Louise'; Costa, Randall [GCO]
> Subject:	PA and ETA topics
>
>
> A conference call has been scheduled for Monday, January 7th for 10:30am
> to discuss the PA and ETA topics with Enron.
> Below is the information for the conference call:
>
> Toll Free Number:	888-780-9655
> Passcode:		ETA
> Leader:			Richard Stuckey
> Confirm:		656118
>
>
> Any questions, contact Debra Kimmel at 212-723-9472
>
> Thanks,
> Debra


Comments, suggestions from other committee members?
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Connolly/NA/Enron on 02/26/2001
09:33 AM ---------------------------

Debbie Gibson <debg@pdq.net> on 02/26/2001 08:31:57 AM
To: Lisa.Connolly@enron.com
cc:

Subject: re: Pre-Interview Questions for Candidates

Troy said questions are OK.  Here are three suggestions from Troy:

1. Please explain briefly the type of government (i.e. City Manager,
Mayor, Council, Fire Commissioner) or other system that you had served
with as a fire officer in the past 10 years.

2. State whether the fire department has any employee group, association
or union that is recognized as the bargaining agent for the department.
If so, please describe your working relationship with that organization.

3. Does the department where you presently work have any type of state or
local civil service?  If so, explain.

On Friday, February 23, 2001  9:05 AM, Lisa.Connolly@enron.com wrote:
>
>Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:05:36 -0600
>From: Lisa.Connolly@enron.com
>To: Jeff.Skilling@enron.com, etblaw@aol.com, gbsmith@smith-graham.com,
>Subject: Pre-Interview Questions for Candidates
>
>Please review the attached document of pre-interview questions I have
>drafted and let me know what you think. I'd like to send this out first
>thing Monday morning to give the candidates a week to respond (interviews
>will take place on Tuesday, March 6 from 8am to 2pm.)  Following each
>question you will find my reason (in bold and italics) for asking that
>specific question - it has been included in the attached document only for
>your information.
>
>We are almost there!
>
>Thanks,
>Lisa
>
>(See attached file: pre-interview questions.doc)
>

Debbie Gibson


Strategy meeting to prepare for the Avaya discussions on January 8th.

Jeff - Would you please send out the details for the Weds Jan 10th meeting so
we can plan travel, etc ?

Greg - We will call you from the phone in the conference room ?

thanks, Kim


John

Ed Mills' phone number

816  527  1261

Vince


Ben,

I changed a formula in Spread option revenue of IS page to reflect curve
shift. Take a look and call me if you have any comment. Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/10/2001
07:33 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Sherri Sera                           04/09/2001 08:26 PM

To:
cc:  (bcc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron)

Subject: Some funnies

-Had to share these...SRS

 - airolane.jpg
 - bombtech.jpg
 - fortune.jpg
 - hotdog.jpg
 - watchp.jpg
 - newad.jpg


FYI.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Healy/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000 07:40
AM ---------------------------

Michael D Nanny@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/26/2000 04:33 PM
To: Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Robert P Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revision No.1 for ENA Fuelcell Estimate dated 10/26/2000

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael D Nanny/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/26/2000 04:25 PM ---------------------------

Ray Danner@ENRON
10/26/2000 03:44 PM
To: Michael D Nanny/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Terri
Austin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Jay Patel/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Robin Long/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Revision No.1 for ENA Fuelcell Estimate dated 10/26/2000

Mike,

Attached are the revised (Revision 1) BOP Estimates for the Wallingford Fuel
Cells Power Project (10 cells - 21.2 MW) and the Midcon (Hartford) Fuel Cells
Power Project (12 cells - 28.8 MW) in the amount of $9.5MM and $9.6 MM
respectively. These estimates reflect our discussions today with the
following comments provided:

 1. I have lowered the Contingency to 10% from 15% per the direction from
Mike Coleman. Estimating does not agree with this reduced contingency and I
feel it is inadequate for the level of detail provided.

 2. Because of this reduction in contingency, I have re-evaluated the
concrete account and moved the Slab on Grade from the FCE Scope to the EE&CC
Scope of Work. I have also revised the foundations for FCE based on the
quantities they provided.

 3. We are using $10,000 per cell for Grounding Grid based on reviewing
additional estimating data. (The earlier number of $75,000 for the first two
(2) cells  and $25,000 for each additional cell was provided as an estimate
from FCE.  We agree it is too high.

 4. Based on our discussions, we are using $450,000 per project for
Engineering Services.

A Basis of Estimate is also provided.

Please call if you have questions or if you want to have additional meetings.

Ray Danner

---------------------- Forwarded by Ray Danner/NA/Enron on 10/26/2000 03:26
PM ---------------------------
From: Jay Patel@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/26/2000 03:24 PM
To: Ray Danner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Revision No.1 for ENA Fuelcell Estimate dated 10/26/2000

Ray, herewith, please find the subject Estimate and respective Basis of
Estimate.

Regards
Jay N. Patel
   X-55262


Sharen,

Kate Symes asked me to email you and let you know that we do verbal confirms
with Valley Electric.  We speak with Valley quite often, and confirm deals
with them over the phone.  We have never sent them paper confirms, and we
would like to keep the relationship the way it is.  If you have any questions
please feel free to contact me.

Thanks,
Stan
(503) 464-3829


Ed I have been busy in Az and have neglected your email.  Sorry about that.  Is there a one page form that I can submit that will say that nothing has changed at a faility in the last 5 years for the below facilities?  Either that or I can write a one page letter stating this fact and reqeust that the OCD renew the permit again.  Which is best for you?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Martin, Ed  [mailto:EMARTIN@state.nm.us]
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:18 PM
To:	Larry Campbell (E-mail)
Subject:	Discharge Plans

Here's a listing of the permits expiring over the next year or so:

	GW-90		Portales C.S.		Expires 2/27/02
	GW-89		Corona C.S.		Exprers 3/9/02
	GW-95		Laguna C.S.		Expires 3/9/02
	GW-109	Carlsbad C.S.		Expires 5/18/02
	GW-110	Mountainair C.S.	Expires 5/18/02
	GW-113	Eunice C.S.		Expires 6/19/02
	GW-283	Jal C.S.			Expires	6/24/02
	GW-285	Bisti C.S.		Expires 9/24/02

As you know, if you get your renewal applications in 120 prior to the
expiration date, the permit will not expire on the dates above, but will
extend until all paperwork is done on my end.

We need to go out and look at all of these at some point in time, but I will
get back with you to set up a schedule.

Take care and have a good Thanksgiving.

Ed


Market Data has recently made changes to the Reuters Kobra permissioning database.  If you no longer have access to information that you previously utilized on your Kobra application, please contact Julie Pechersky at 713 853-9225 and the data will be restored immediately.

We appreciate your assistance.

Market Data


Thank you for this info.  Sounds like this is getting a fair amount of
attention in the region.

I have your name written on a piece of paper.  Do I owe you a call?

Kay


Thomas:

Attached is a redline of the Client Agreement.  I know that Gary Hickerson
will be meeting with J P Morgan early next week and would like to have this
agreed.  Please advise as to what attorney will review my comments and put me
in touch with that person today.  Please let me know if you have any
questions.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/09/2001 06:47 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	04/09/2001 07:22 PM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>, <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <lchurch@epsa.org>,
Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>,
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, <tmcmorrow@manatt.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: SCE Release regarding Gov Deal

SCE and Governor Reach Agreement on Plan To Restore Utility To Financial
Health

PR Newswire
04/09/01, 7:02p
(Copyright , 2001, PR Newswire)

ROSEMEAD, Calif., April 9 /PRNewswire/ -- At a joint press conference today
with Governor Gray Davis, Edison International Chairman, President and CEO
John E. Bryson announced agreement on a plan to restore Southern California
Edison to financial health.

"This negotiated resolution with the Governor is far preferable for our
company and our employees and for our customers than is going into
bankruptcy," said Bryson.

"Through difficult negotiations over many weeks," Bryson noted, "we believe
we have achieved a practical approach. Our customers and the state's economic
vitality will benefit greatly from a financially healthy utility which can
retain experienced and skilled employees and can invest the billions of
dollars needed to maintain a sound electric infrastructure system.

"The blunt reality remains that we in California face a large challenge in
restoring overall stability to the California electric system," Bryson said.
"Our employees at Edison can make a large difference in helping to meet that
challenge. Vital work remains to be done with the Governor, the Legislature,
the California Public Utilities Commission, and other policymakers, but this
agreement is a large first step toward restoring stability for much of
Southern California."

Today's more detailed agreement follows the framework announced in a February
23 preliminary agreement with the Governor. It was approved by the Edison
International and SCE boards of directors this morning. Implementation will
require further action by the California Legislature and the state Public
Utilities Commission. Both Governor Davis and Bryson have urged swift action
by both bodies.

Major terms of the agreement include:

   -- The state will receive a primary utility asset -- SCE's 12,000-mile
      transmission system.  SCE employees will operate and maintain the
      system through a contractual arrangement with the state.

   -- Edison International and SCE commit to no less than $3 billion of
      capital investment in utility infrastructure over the next five years.

   -- For the next 10 years, SCE will sell the output from its power plants
      under cost-based, rather than market-based, pricing.

   -- For the next 10 years, Edison Mission Energy's unregulated Sunrise
      power plant will sell its output exclusively to California under
      cost-based pricing.

   -- SCE agrees to forego development of 20,000 acres of its Big Creek and
      Eastern Sierra hydroelectric properties and grants conservation
      easements in perpetuity to the state for land and habitat preservation
      on these properties.

   -- SCE will gain a means of repaying the debt it incurred buying power for
      its customers during the current rate freeze.

   -- Upon implementation of this agreement by the Legislature and CPUC, SCE
      will drop its lawsuit against state regulators.

A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding will be available later today on
Edison's investor Web site: www.edisoninvestor.com.

Based in Rosemead, Calif., Edison International (NYSE: EIX) is the parent
company of Southern California Edison, Edison Mission Energy, Edison Capital,
Edison O&M Services, and Edison Enterprises.

SOURCE Southern California Edison

/CONTACT: Southern California Edison Corporate Communications, 626-302-2255/

/Web site: http://www.sce.com/

/Web site: http://www.edisoninvestor.com/

/Web site: http://www.edisonnews.com/

(EIX)


Hi Nancy,

We are getting geared up to look at the interconnection agreement and work on
the land lease.  Just thought you might want to put it on the list of fun
things to do in the future.

Kay


[IMAGE]

 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]       [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]      Search  Amazon.com for:

 We hope you  enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future  e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit the Help page  Updating  Subscriptions and Communication Preferences  and click the Customer  Communication Preferences link.   Please note  that this e-mail was sent to the following address:  don.baughman@enron.com

[IMAGE]


pls print.  t hanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/19/2001
08:31 AM ---------------------------

Stanley Horton
03/13/2001 01:25 PM
Sent by: Cindy Stark
To: Bill Cordes/NPNG/Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Danny
McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron,
Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Virginia O'Neill/NPNG/Enron, Ruth Mann/ET&S/Enron, Rita
Houser/GPGFIN/Enron, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron, Amelia Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON,
Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anne Jolibois/FGT/Enron, Emily
Sellers/ET&S/Enron, Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron,
Janice Hogan/GPGFIN/Enron, Carolyn Perry/OTS/Enron

Subject: ETS HALF DAY STAFF MEETING AGENDA - MARCH 21, 2001

Please reference the attached agenda.  If you have any questions or concerns,
do not hesitate to call me.

Please be sure to advise me if you are UNABLE to attend!

Thanks,
Cindy
X36197


when is your bachelor party?


Steve

given the practitioner audience, I would prefer a less technical
presentation. Perhaps if you can talk about use of real options at Enron in
general, and then give some examples (graphically --no notation) of
diagrammatic representation might be good. Remember there are many talks
and the capacity of the audience to absorb notation, grammar, and technical
detail is limited.

How about a more generic title "Real Options at Enron?"

Please give me your title within Enron please

At 11:07 D_ 04/25/00 +0100, Steven.Leppard@enron.com wrote:
>
>
>Lenos
>
>I'd like to give a talk entitled "Diagrammatic Representation of Real
>Options in Enron", in which I will give a brief run-down of a diagrammatic
>technique I have developed for representing real option deals.  My notation
>allows originators, managers and quants to communicate unambiguously, while
>still appreciating the complexity and subtlety of real optionality.  I have
>defined a "diagrammatic grammar" which guarantees that the pricing of the
>deal follows immediately and automatically from the diagram.
>
>I propose to introduce the symbols and grammar, then go on to present some
>suitable examples of diagrams.  If appropriate I'll talk about the links
>with dynamic programming.  (I will need some guidance as to how much
>technical detail I can go into based on the audience.)
>
>All the best,
>Steve
>
>
>
>
> (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
> image moved
> to file:      From:  Lenos Trigeorgis
> pic29415.pcx) <lenos@ucy.ac.cy>
>               04/20/2000 08:45 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>To:   "Steven Leppard" <Steven.Leppard@enron.com>
>cc:   "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
>
>Subject:  Re: Real options conference in Cambridge
>
>
>Steve
>
>thanks for agreeing to talk. I attach the program to see the other speakers
>and style (it is addressed to a professional autience)
>
>Please give me a suitable title for the talk (replacing Kaminski%s slot on
>July 6/Energy session) and the details of your position
>
>Thanks
>
>Lenos
>
>At 05:01 __ 04/20/00 +0100, Steven Leppard wrote:
>>
>>
>>Dear Prof Trigeorgis
>>
>>Vince Kaminski has suggested that I would be a suitable speaker at your
>July
>>conference in Cambridge, and I'd be happy to come along if required.
>Please
>>could you send me appropriate details, and the audience type expected.
>>
>>Many thanks.
>>
>>Yours sincerely,
>>Steve Leppard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>(See attached file: 4thconfsessions.doc)
>
>Lenos Trigeorgis
>Professor of Finance
>University of Cyprus
>Dept of Business
>75 Kallipoleos, PO Box 20537
>CY 1678 Nicosia CYPRUS
>
>Tel: +357 2 892261
>Fax:        339063
>
>
>
>Attachment Converted: "c:\drive_e\eudora\attach\pic29415.pcx"
>
>Attachment Converted: "c:\drive_e\eudora\attach\4thconfsessions17.doc"
>
Lenos Trigeorgis
Professor of Finance
University of Cyprus
Dept of Business
75 Kallipoleos, PO Box 20537
CY 1678 Nicosia CYPRUS

Tel: +357 2 892261
Fax:        339063


I have incorporated the following adjustments:

In the web description, David Forster is adamate that we use 'Fin Curr Swap'
in leiu of 'Curr Par Fwd'. In the event that we offer this product externally
we need to be poised to demonstrate that we offering the same Product both
internally and externally. We understand that this could be viewed as a
series of Forwards, but it is, in fact, a swap, as we are paying Fixed
Amounts vs Floating Amounts in a like currency.

In the web description 'CAD/USD' has become 'CAD/$-m' to designate USD per
month.

I have included a blurb on how we derive at the Notional Quantity per
Determination Period.

I have removed the 'CAD' from 'CAD Fixed Amounts' and 'CAD Floating Amounts;
because we state what the Contractual Currency is, it's redundant, and
removing it allows us to open up to other currencies.

I've indicated that the unit of volume is in 1,000,000 USD.

Comments, please; but I think we are there, and will commence building this
in Production today.

Dale


Please find attached an electronic copy of the letter El Paso Merchant
Energy, L.P. filed with Chief Judge Wagner today, informing him that EPME
will not file direct testimony on market affiliate issues today but reserves
its right to file rebuttal testimony on July 23, 2001.

Received: from mcafee.bracepatt.com by mail.bracepatt.com; Fri, 13 Jul 2001
14:26:32 -0500
Received: FROM inet.skadden.com BY mcafee.bracepatt.com ; Fri Jul 13 14:41:34
2001 -0500
X-Proxy: keymaster.bracepatt.com protected
Received: from Allegro_Inet-Message_Server by inet.skadden.com with
Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:21:01 -0400
Message-Id: <sb4f11dd.035@inet.skadden.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 5.5.4.1
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:19:54 -0400
From: "Gerald Richman" <GRICHMAN@skadden.com>
To: <dshaffer@akllp.com>,<kminesinger@akllp.com>, <rrich@bracepatt.com>,
<moloughl@brattle.com>, <jhmcgrew@brudergentile.com>,
<jmmarcoux@brudergentile.com>, <hym@cpuc.ca.gov>, <jab@cpuc.ca.gov>,
<daniel.collins@elpaso.com>, <greg.jones@elpaso.com>,
<judy.heineman@elpaso.com>, <mark.cook@elpaso.com>,
<jlgreene@energyadvocates.com>, <curtis.wagner@ferc.fed.us>,
<edith.gilmore@ferc.fed.us>, <marcia.hooks@ferc.fed.us>,
<martha.altamar@ferc.fed.us>, <ruby.meek@ferc.fed.us>,
<jmoriarty@fw-law.com>, <kbedwards@gkrse-law.com>, <jfagan@hewm.com>,
<PMohler@hewm.com>, <DLBeresford@HHLAW.com>, <GSterling@HHLAW.com>,
<bjost@huberlaw.com>, <dhuard@manatt.com>, <jgregg@mbolaw.com>,
<lochsenhirt@mbolaw.com>, <dmcwash@mshpc.com>, <frl3@pge.com>,
<sandrar@prestongates.com>, <GBaker@Sempra.com>, <wlansinger@Sempra.com>,
"Doug Robinson" <DROBINSO@skadden.com>, "Jeffrey Sherman"
<JSherman@skadden.com>, "William Scherman" <WSCHERMA@skadden.com>,
<ryspeed-bost@verner.com>
Cc: <imoreno@bcjlaw.com>,<rmp@cpuc.ca.gov>, <douglas.porter@sce.com>
Subject: RP00-241
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_5B01220D.83E22A74"

Please find attached an electronic copy of the letter El Paso Merchant
Energy, L.P. filed with Chief Judge Wagner today, informing him that EPME
will not file direct testimony on market affiliate issues today but reserves
its right to file rebuttal testimony on July 23, 2001.

 - was2_324897_2.pdf


thank you

	"Bev Hansen" <bhansen@lhom.com>
	07/11/2001 06:21 PM

		 To: "Jeff Dasovich" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Energy Action Report

-----Original Message-----
From: info@energyaction.org [mailto:info@energyaction.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:18 AM
To: bhansen@lhom.com
Subject: Energy Action Report

CEA Campaign Headquarters
RELEASE DATE: July 11, 2001,  16:15:28 PST
Energy Action Report
MEMORANDUM
 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
TO:                  Californians for Energy Action
FROM:            KPC Communications & Woodward & McDowell
RE:                   First Newspaper Ad, Media Briefing
Californians for Energy Action2s first newspaper ad appeared this morning in
the Sacramento Bee.  Jack Stewart, president of the California Manufacturers
and Technology Association, and Allan Zaremberg, president of the California
Chamber of Commerce, conducted a successful briefing for Sacramento-based
news media this morning as well to introduce the coalition and the business
community2s perspective on energy issues.
Media that attended the briefing included KCRA TV, California Public Radio,
KFBK News Radio, the Wall Street Journal, the San Jose Mercury News, the Dow
Jones News Service (via telephone), and the San Diego Union Tribune.  In
addition to the briefing, we distributed a news release on the coalition and
the ad to the Capitol Press Corps, which includes all of the major newspapers
in the state.  Additionally, the California Channel taped the entire briefing
and is broadcasting it in its entirety today.
Allan and Jack did a great job focusing the discussion on the issue of direct
access and concerns about maintaining a competitive and healthy business
climate in California.  The questions were generally informed and seemed
accepting of the fact that there are legitimate and serious concerns over the
direction some of the energy debate is taking in Sacramento.
The news release, ad copy, and other coalition material is posted on
Californians for Energy Action web site soon. The address is
www.energyaction.org.
Jason Barnett
info@energyaction.org

CEA Campaign Headquarters
Californians for Energy Action


Start Date: 4/2/01; HourAhead hour: 10;  HourAhead schedule download failed.
Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040210.txt
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: Crawler lifetime exceeded.
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
!!!An error occurred while attempting to initialize the Borland Database
Engine (error $2A04)
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


The use of cell phones and pagers has increased dramatically in the past few
years.  As a result the Accounts Payable department has seen a rapid increase
in the number of invoices and vendors.  With the higher volume, we have
reviewed our processes in order to continue our rapid payment cycle.

Although we encourage vendors to address their invoices to individual
employees, they often mail invoices directly to Accounts Payable.  At times
they fail to list the individual who uses the pager or cell phone.  In these
cases we return the invoice to the vendor.  If the employee is designated, we
try to track him/her down and forward the invoice.  The high level of
employee movement among jobs and locations at Enron has made this
increasingly challenging.  Either way, we end up doing something less
productive than paying invoices.

To maintain satisfactory response to our vendors and to reduce time necessary
for research, we request that employees who have pagers, cell phones, and
other individually billed items such as licenses, subscriptions, etc., pay
for them by personal check or charge card (if applicable*payment instructions
are usually indicated on the invoice) and request reimbursement through
employee expense reports.

By submitting these charges on your expense report, you can help us reduce
the amount of time spent researching and forwarding invoices, the number of
checks generated by Treasury, the number of vendors in our database, and the
turnaround time for payment of invoices.


What do you think of this?


-- http://www.smartmoney.com/ --
======================================================================

------------------------------------------------------------
Daily Views
October 26, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------

On the Street: Watch Out for the Anthrax Gang
By Matthew Goldstein
A host of small companies are popping up with purported solutions for
terrorism. Caveat Investor.
http://www.smartmoney.com/onthestreet/index.cfm?story=200110261
AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE

************************************************************
ADVERTISEMENT
Looking for a top-producing, local real estate agent? A shrewd
negotiator? Someone with a track record? How about all this plus
a system where agents COMPETE for your business. What's more,
HomeGain lets you remain anonymous until you select an agent.
Click below: http://quinst.com/clk/sodantonashibeigoteda
AOL USERS, CLICK
HERE
************************************************************

IN THIS EDITION:
* THE CLOSING BELL
* TODAY'S SMARTMONEY FEATURES
* BREAKING NEWS
* AND WHEN IT WAS ALL OVER: TODAY'S NUMBERS
* HOW DID YOUR STOCKS FARE TODAY?
* SPECIAL OFFER

************************************************************

THE CLOSING BELL
The Blue Chips Blow Ahead
By Rebecca Thomas
Stocks finished the week on a high note as hopes for the coming year
overshadowed negative news on economic and profit fronts.
http://www.smartmoney.com/bn/index.cfm?story=20011026080213
AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE

************************************************************
ADVERTISEMENT
Do you need life insurance? If so, how much? AccuTerm helps you
answer these tough questions with an online needs calculator.
You can also get a free, personalized life insurance quote from
the most accurate quoting engine online. Click below for a free
quote: http://links.quinstreet.com/adclick?area=kangjiaoponenbin
AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE
************************************************************

TODAY'S SMARTMONEY FEATURES

Week in Funds: Teflon Tech Funds
By Dawn Smith
A barrage of bad news didn't stick to stocks this week, allowing tech
funds to gain more than 9%.
http://www.smartmoney.com/fundinsight/weekinfunds/index.cfm?story=20011026
AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE

Say What?: Seek and You Shall Find
By Roben Farzad
One analyst figured that Overture's Internet search engine was really a
profit engine. Investors who logged on found a healthy gain.
http://www.smartmoney.com/saywhat/index.cfm?Story=20011026
AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE

The Silent Treatment
By Roben Farzad
With one-time highflyer Enron, there are now far more questions than
answers.
http://www.smartmoney.com/stockwatch/index.cfm?story=200110252
AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE

A Rare Tech Triumph
By Monica Rivituso
EDS not only had a stellar quarter. It also said things look just dandy
for the coming year. How can that be?
http://www.smartmoney.com/stockwatch/index.cfm?story=200110251
AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE

************************************************************
ADVERTISEMENT
Want to get a REAL job? Learn the skills you need to get
ahead in the business world -- certificate and degree programs
available from the best schools. Don't wait -- Learn More.
http://quinst.com/c.jsp?area=chuaizuichongchifen
AOL USERS,
CLICK HERE
************************************************************

BREAKING NEWS
Lockheed Martin Tops Estimates;
Ericsson Chairman to Depart as Losses Mount;
JDS Uniphase Revenues Dive;
Consumer Sentiment Brightens in October;
UnitedHealth's Bottom Line Swells;
Amgen Profits Inch Up;
Sales of New Homes Slip in September;
VeriSign Beats the Street;
Flextronics to Cut 10,000 Workers;
Kraft to Trim 1,000 Jobs;
Ivax to Supply Anthrax Drug to U.S.;
More...
http://www.smartmoney.com/
AOL USERS, CLICK HERE

************************************************************
Introducing SmartMoney Select -- New from SmartMoney.com!
New financial tools Cutting edge technology. Upgrade to
SmartMoney Select today and get a free two-week trial.
https://ecommerce.smartmoney.com/ecommerce/login?adv=SM.com&advtype=Select_newsletter_blurb1

AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE
************************************************************

AND WHEN IT WAS ALL OVER: TODAY'S NUMBERS:
(As of 4:31 p.m. ET)
DJIA 9545.17  82.27
Nasdaq 1768.96  -6.51
S&P 500 1104.61  4.52
Rus 2000 438.65  2.69
10 Yr Bd 4.52  -0.05
DJTA 2247.58  7.59
FTSE 100 5188.60  102.00
H. Seng 10404.70  161.30
Nik. 225 10795.10  -85.00
DAX 4778.41  62.81

************************************************************

INSURANCE CENTER
Comparison-shop for insurance. SmartMoney.com's Insurance
Quotes Center lets you shop for auto, life, home, renters'
and health insurance conveniently and securely without
sales pressure. In minutes, you can receive free, accurate
quotes from the nation's leading insurance providers.
http://www.smartmoney.com/marketplace/index.cfm?story=insurance
AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE

************************************************************

HOW DID YOUR STOCKS FARE TODAY?
Use any combination of these SmartMoney.com Investor Tools
to rediscover your new bottom line:
* Portfolio Tracker http://www.smartmoney.com/portfolio/
* Map of the Market http://www.smartmoney.com/marketmap/
* Sector Tracker http://www.smartmoney.com/sectortracker/

************************************************************

SPECIAL INVESTMENT OFFER: How much would it cost you to receive
unbiased, rigorously investigated financial information every month from
the best financial journalists in the business? Well the editors of The
Wall Street Journal are waiting to send you their magazine of personal
business, SmartMoney, for a mere $1.25 a month. Filled with insights and
tips aimed at improving your bottom line, it could be the one financial
investment you can't afford to miss. For details, visit here now:
http://ccare.hearstmags.com/cgi-bin/absplit.cgi?SplitFile=smynewsletter.urls
AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE

************************************************************

Soon, we will begin offering this newsletter in HTML format. If you wish
to continue receiving the plain-text version of this email, please visit

http://www.smartmoney.com/mailinglist/index.cfm?story=maileradmin
to set your preferences.

If you have an AOL address you're already set to receive the newsletter
in text. No action is required on your part.

Thank you,
The SmartMoney.com Staff

==============================================================
JOINING AND LEAVING THE LIST

Use the form on our site to join or leave our mailing lists:
   http://www.smartmoney.com/mailinglist/index.cfm?story=maileradmin
   AOL
USERS, CLICK HERE

If you have any questions or problems, please email us at:
        helplistdaily@smartmoneylist.com

================================================================
SmartMoney.com Daily Views.
SmartMoney.com (c) 2001 SmartMoney.
SmartMoney is a joint publishing venture of Dow Jones & Company,
Inc. and Hearst Communications, Inc.


I SHOULD BE AT MY DESK MOST OF THE DAY, GIVE ME A CALL.

JOE
39636


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
12:03 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Julie Brewer @ ENRON                           03/14/2001 11:27 AM

To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kara L Boudreau/HOU/ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Royed/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luchas
Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Nelson/Corp/Enron, Stewart Range/NA/Enron, Shifali Sharma/NA/Enron, Keynan
Dutton/NA/Enron, Carole Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Veronica Hill/NA/Enron, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, George Huan/NA/Enron,
Amy Cavazos/NA/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan
O'Rourke/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rebooks

If your name is in the right hand column, please rebook as indicated by
Credit.

Thanks.

Julie Brewer