What a mess.  Keeping discovery at bay should, obviously, continue to be a
very high priority for us.  Let me know if these strange events signal an
increased likelihood that Gynberg will be able to pursue discovery.  Thanks.
df

STACI
HOLTZMAN
12/11/2000 09:06 AM

To: Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@Enron, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Status Conference before Judge Downes

FYI.  (I have not yet had an opportunity to talk to Charlie about any of
this.)
---------------------- Forwarded by Staci Holtzman/FGT/Enron on 12/11/2000
09:07 AM ---------------------------

"Tetrault, Charles D." <ctetrault@velaw.com> on 12/07/2000 04:31:10 PM
To: "Richard B. Sanders (E-mail)" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>, "Staci
Holtzman (E-mail)" <sholtzm@enron.com>
cc: "Barrett H. Reasoner (E-mail)" <breasoner@Gibbs-Bruns.com>

Subject: Status Conference before Judge Downes

There was a lengthy status conference this afternoon, lasting about an hour
and a quarter.  It was marred by extremely poor telephone connections.  The
technical difficulties frustrated the parties and the judge and made the
conference a mess.

Without trying to summarize the conference, I note a few things that the
Court decided to do based on the discussions.

1.   Quinque.  Judge Downes agreed to have oral argument on the motion to
remand in Quinque on January 3, 2001 at 1:15 p.m. in Casper.  One hour was
set aside for argument.  He declined Mike Beatty's suggestion of an
additional executive summary of the briefing.  The judge was the first one
to suggest the oral argument.  The plaintiffs suggested that the Court rule
on the papers, but quickly acquiesced to the Court's suggestion when the
defendants said that they wanted argument.

2.    Osterhoudt.   Osterhoudt appeared pro se.  Motion to disqualify
Wright's counsel (Phillips & Cohen) and estopping Mr. Wright on some claims.
Both Osterhoudt and Wright want oral argument.  Wright defendants and DOJ
didn't object.  Osterhoudt was appearing pro se, and so there was a long
rambling discussion of the matter.  The judge was reluctant to cut off a pro
se party, but ultimately did.  Regrettably, the rambling discussion set the
tone for the rest of the call.

3.   Osterhoudt.   Government's motion to dismiss Ousterhoudt's case.
Government wants its motion to dismiss Grynberg's valuation claims to be
heard at the same time.  The government claims these relator status issues
are holding up the Shell $56 million settlement and any future settlements.
Grynberg objected to having the motion in Grynberg heard at the same time.
Grynberg wants discovery from Wright and the government.

4.    Pending Motions.  The Court, of out frustration at the inability to
hear the parties and at the attempts by some to argue the merits of things
that the Court was not prepared to address, set down two hours for oral
argument on February 22, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. on all pending  motions in
Wright and Grynberg that address the jurisdictional issues discussed on the
call and the motions to dismiss.  This obviously will create some problems.
It was far from clear precisely which motions that the Court had in mind.
While there are not that many motions pending, some of the pending
government motions likely could affect public disclosure / original source
motions that the defendants could, but have not yet, filed.  The defendants
have not filed those motions yet because of a desire to first test the
complaints on Rule 9(b) grounds.

5.   Discovery.   Parties who want discovery on those issues (Grynberg and
probably the Wright defendants) were given one day to present their position
by letter to the Court.  Other parties then will have two days to respond.

6.    Liaison Counsel.   The Court designated Tom Nicholas as Liaison
Counsel for the defendants in the Wright case and Don Schultz as Liaison
Counsel for the defendants in the Quinque case.

7.    February 22 hearing.  Phil Figa, one of Grynberg's lawyers, was given
the task of leading the consultation among counsel concerning how the
pending motions should be addressed at the hearing and how the time should
be divided.

Charles D. Tetrault
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1455 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004-1008
ctetrault@velaw.com
202.639.6551 [voice]
202.639.6604 [fax]

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


ya'll  enjoy
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael  [mailto:mikedfw@attbi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:26  AM
To: Allison Sisneros (E-mail); Allison Sisneros (E-mail); Annemarie  (E-mail); ARNETNG (E-mail); Barbara (E-mail); Bob Block (E-mail); Butch Bowlin  (E-mail); Cathy (E-mail); Colleen (E-mail); Dan Healey Maxx (E-mail); David  Barber (E-mail); 'Ed Roussin' (E-mail); 'Emily' (E-mail); George Belk (E-mail);  Jackie (E-mail); JerryGeronimo (E-mail); Kelly Swafford (E-mail); Ken (E-mail);  Larry Goodwin (E-mail); Larry Sanders (E-mail); Lucy (E-mail); Lynn Green  (E-mail); Marie White (E-mail); Marilyn B (E-mail); Mary Ecker (E-mail);  MARY_DELCAMPO (E-mail); Nancykoth (E-mail); Nina Barbre (E-mail); Pamela Calhoun  (E-mail); Regina Sanders (E-mail); Robin (E-mail); Roger Koch Legget (E-mail);  Sam (E-mail); Shawn O'Connor Maxx (E-mail); Sue B Maxx (E-mail); Susan Kopp  Amstan (E-mail); Susan Mitchell (E-mail); Tim Schusler (E-mail); Tina Dungan  (E-mail); Toni Gerace (E-mail); Veena Stewart (E-mail); 'William_C_Willison  (E-mail)
Subject: Of course dear...

 - perfect-joke.htm


Mark,

Attached are two versions of recently executed Termination Agreements.  One
related to a Master Agreement termination, and the other related to a
termination of a trade.  The second doc may be what you are looking for,
being that a provision dealing with a termination payment was included
therein.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3806A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
E:mail:  Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Hello everyone:

A meeting has been scheduled to discuss e-online, this Friday, June 2 at
11:30 AM, in EB19C2.

Please let me know if you have a conflict.

Thanks!

Shirley Crenshaw


Larry Soderquist has forwarded to me a TVA schedule of the Shelby upgrade.
If it's not already in Deal Bench, let me know and I'll forward it down.
Scheduled completion is May, '02.

Mitch


Cary,
 Jeff Hodge asked that I incorporate the agreed to items from their request
which was forwarded to Jeff by Gregg Penman on January 18, 2001 into a
document.  I have taken the document that Jeff forwarded to Sherry Brinkman
on December 7, 2000 and included the acceptable changes that Jeff indicated
were acceptable in his email to Gregg Penman on January 18, 2001.  If this is
your understanding, please let me know what else needs to be done to finalize
the documents.


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/19/2001>, published as of 11/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


The following is a copy of the May Option Payment Calendar.  Please compare
with your records and let me know you have any comments, additions or
deletions to the May Calendar:


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Will, Lloyd
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:51 AM
To:	Black, Tamara Jae
Cc:	Rode, Tina
Subject:	FW: NERC Issues 2001/2002 Winter Reliability Assessment

TJ Please forward to all East Power staff.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Heather Gibbs" <Heather.Gibbs@nerc.net> (by way of "Richard A. Bulley" <rab@maininc.org>)@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:44 AM
To:	bodplus@maininc.org; ocplus@maininc.org; ecplus@maininc.org; marketinterfaceplus@maininc.org
Cc:	lrj@maininc.org; ljk@maininc.org; per@maininc.org; rhg@maininc.org; tpg@maininc.org; rnm@maininc.org; djp@maininc.org; ndm@maininc.org
Subject:	NERC Issues 2001/2002 Winter Reliability Assessment

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Today NERC released its 2001/2002 Winter Assessment.  "Generating
resources will be adequate to meet projected electricity demand in North
America during the 2001/2002 winter season," says Michehl R. Gent,
President and CEO of the North American Electric Reliability Council
(NERC).  "Significant generation has been added in several NERC Regions
and available capacity margins are expected to be equal to or greater
than those projected for last winter in the majority of the NERC
Regions."

For your convenience, a copy of the press release announcing the
2001/2002 Winter Assessment is shown below.  A copy is also available on
the following NERC web site:
http://www.nerc.com/~filez/pressreleases.html

If you have any questions, let me know.

Sincerely,

Heather Gibbs

Contact: Ellen Vancko
Evancko@nerc.com

November 20, 2001

NERC Issues 2001/2002 Winter Reliability Assessment

Today NERC released its 2001/2002 Winter Assessment.  "Generating
resources will be adequate to meet projected electricity demand in North
America during the 2001/2002 winter season," says Michehl R. Gent,
President and CEO of the North American Electric Reliability Council
(NERC).  "Significant generation has been added in several NERC Regions
and available capacity margins are expected to be equal to or greater
than those projected for last winter in the majority of the NERC
Regions."

"Transmission systems in North America are also expected to perform
reliably," he added, "although some transmission congestion is expected
during the course of the winter."  According to the report, fuel
supplies, inventories, and deliveries are expected to be adequate this
winter.  Natural gas storage facilities are currently at levels 20
percent greater than the same time last year.

The report notes that the Pacific Northwest remains under a severe
drought condition that limits its ability to generate electricity from
hydropower resources, although reductions in customer demand are
sufficient to preclude the need for rotating blackouts.  California's
demand and resource situation has improved since last winter due to a
combination of increased resources and reduced demand.  California is
expected to have adequate capacity margins throughout the winter.

For a copy of the 2001/2002 Winter Assessment, visit NERC's web site at
(http://www.nerc.com).  NERC's web site also includes information on the
electric industry's electricity supply and delivery programs and
activities.

*********************

NERC is a not-for-profit company formed as a result of the Northeast
blackout in 1965 to promote the reliability of the bulk electric systems
that serve North America.  It works with all segments of the electric
industry as well as customers to "keep the lights on" by developing and
encouraging compliance with rules for the reliable operation of these
systems.  NERC comprises ten Regional Reliability Councils that account
for virtually all the electricity supplied in the United States, Canada,
and a portion of Baja California Norte, Mexico.


This language is different that what GE was told was requested before.  I am
more comfortable going back to GE with what was requested previously.

Kay

"Timothy Oxley" <TOxley@winston.com> on 12/13/2000 08:38:52 PM
To: <Kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: <robtaylor@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: GE Release

Pursuant to the request of Rose Engeldorf, the following is the
suggested language for insertion into the GE Consent:

"Each of GE Packaged Power and GE acknowledge that WestLB is a third
party beneficiary of this Consent and shall be entitled to enforce its
provisions against GE Packaged Power and GE, respectively, as if a
party to this Consent."


Attached is a summary of two recent depositions in the Sempra litigation. We are in the process of scheduling a number of depositions for June and July.  When the schedule is firmed up, I'll circulate it to you.  Please call with any questions.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Leit, David " <DLeit@brobeck.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Leit+2C+20David+20+22+20+3CDLeit+40brobeck+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 11:41 AM
To:	Brownfeld, Gail; Farache, Olivier; Johnson, Christopher; Markel, Gregory; Schmidt, Darren; Setton, Ronit; Singley, Michael; Zeisler, Aaron
Subject:	Summary of Mooza and Cahill depositions.DOC

 <<Summary of Mooza and Cahill depositions.DOC>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - Summary of Mooza and Cahill depositions.DOC


Vegas trip was pretty interesting.  Give me a call tonight if you get a chance.  Try the cell phone any time after 4:30 (Houston time) -
(713) 775-6472.

If I'd spent any longer  than three days in that town I'd be dead right now.  I think the earliest I made it back to my room was around 6:45 am.


Vince: I would appreciate your comments.
Thanks
Krishna.


-----Original Message-----
From: *SSSB Utilities Team [mailto:sssbutilteam@imceu.sbi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:16 AM
Subject: US Utility Market - Weekly Update

SCHRODER SALOMON SMITH BARNEY

Our weekly US e-mail product is designed to provide clients with a useful
overview of news, valuations, and key energy price data from the US market.
This week:

*	Initiation of coverage on Reliant Resources.
*	Chart in Section 2. shows US forward spark spreads remain weak.

1. Valuation Multiples
Open this pdf to see a comprehensive schedule of valuation multiples for US
utility, power trader, merchant generator, and power technology companies.

 <<USUtils1.pdf>>  <<IPR Valuations Table Output.xls>>

We provide a summary of US consensus P/E ratios by electric utility strategy
below:

			2001E P/E	2002E P/E
Distribution		12.7x		11.4x
Integrated Utilities	13.0x		11.5x
Electric Generators	10.6x		8.7x
Energy Merchants	13.1x		11.6x
Source: I/B/E/S, Schroder Salomon Smith Barney estimates

2. Prices
Open this attachment to see current and forward price and spark spreads in
the key US power regions where European companies are active. Covered in the
charts is the Western US region (COB, Palo Verde, Mid Columbia), the North
East (Neepool), and Texas (ERCOT B).

 <<US Power Prices 14 Jan 02.pdf>>

3. News Highlights

*	PJM Study Says Single Northeast RTO Too Costly - Tuesday, 15 January
	The PJM Interconnection has released a preliminary cost/benefit
analysis suggesting the costs of joining a single Northeast RTO would
outweigh the benefits. In particular, PJM believes it would lose over $690m
of generator revenues, production costs and load payments a year. The
reports suggests the ISO New England would lose $324m per annum, while ISO
New York could save up to $2bn. PJM is expetced to pursue an agreement it
has reached with the Midwest ISO to create a single market. As a result, the
New England and New York ISOs are expected to pursue an RTO of their own.
Source: Platts.

*	UBS Wins Enron Trading - Friday, 11 January
	UBS has emerged as the winning bidder for control of Enron's
electronic commodity and derivatives trading operations, beating Citigroup
and BP. The sale was limited to a 51% stake in a new company called Netco
holding the hardward, software and employment conracts. The $13-billion
contract book was not included. There is no cash invloved, instead the offer
will give Enron one-thirs of any profits from a revived trading operation
over the next five years. EnronOnline is expected to be up and running again
within weeks. Source: Platts.

*	Vermont Yankee Sale Under Threat - Friday, 11 January
	The sale of the 540MW Vermont Yankee plant to Entergy ran into new
problems as teh Vermont Department of Public Service recommended new
conditions for the sale. In particular, the DPS would want the nuclear plant
to continue to sell power to local utilities at negotiated prices after 2012
if its operating license is renewed. Under the existing sales terms Entergy
would be free to sell on a merchant basis from 2012. A final decision is
expected mid-2002. Source: Platts.

	Vermont Yankee is part-owned (22.5%) by National Grid USA, the US
business of National Grid (NGG.L, 1M, 459p). Until the plant is sold,
National Grid USA will continue to share 80% of the revenues and costs with
customers through CTCs. The remaining 20% accounts for under 1% of National
Grid's total operating profit.

*	Retail Choice Popular in Texas - Friday, 11 January
	ERCOT has stated that it has received requests to switch over 34,000
retail electricity customers to new suppliers since it started accepting
requests on 17 December 2001, ahead of full retail competition on 1 January
2002.
	Source: Platts

	Centrica (CNA.L, 2M, 233p) filed an application in September 2001
with the Public Utility Commission of Texas to be licensed as a retail
electric provider (REP) in the state. It sought authority to begin marketing
electric service to residential and small commercial customers, and it plans
to provide service under the brand names of Republic Power and Energy
America. Centrica has held preliminary discussions with potential wholesale
power suppliers. Its primary focus will be on key metropolitan areas such as
Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and Corpus Christi.

*	California AG Sues PG&E - Friday, 11 January
	California Attorney General has filed a lawsuit seeking $600m-$4bn
damages from PG&E Corp. for allegedly violating legal agreements designed to
protect utility ratepayers. Source: Platts

*	New York State Sues Niagara Mohawk/NRG - Thursday, 10 January
	New York State has filed a lawsuit accusing Niagara Mohawk (NiMo)
and NRG of violating the Clean Air Act. The lawsuit refers to two coal-fired
plants that NiMo sold to NRG in 1998, Huntley and Dunkirk. It alleges that
improvements were made to the plant  without upgrading air pollution
controls. NRG and NiMo themselves are fighting over who has responsibility
for the pollution controls, which could cost $350m. NiMo is suing NRG,
saying the responsibility for the controls lies with NRG and was specified
in the sales contract. NRG dispute this claim. Both lawsuits are pending.
Source: Dow Jones

	National Grid (NGG.L, 1M, 459p) are currently in the process of
acquiring NiMo in a deal expected to close early this year. NiMo has exited
from generation over the last few years and is a wires-focused business.

*	Mirant Triples Cash Reserves - Thursday, 10 January
	A recent credit rating downgrade to "junk" status by Moody's has
forced Mirant to triple the amount of cash it uses to support its trading
operations to upto $1bn. Mirant also said that its ability to do long-term
structured deals has been affected. However, the company believes it is well
positioned to benefit from the demise of Enron. Source: Platts

*	Peoples to Build 1,200MW Oregon Plant - Tuesday, 8 January
	Peoples Energy plans to file applications in Oregon to build a
1,200MW merchant CCGT plant. Source: Platts

4. US Research
We summarise below relevant research from SSB's US Utilities Team. The full
reports can be found on SSSB's GEO (Global Equity Online) service.

RELIANT RESOURCES (3H, Current: $15.59, Target: $17.00) - We initiate
coverage on Reliant Resources (RRI)  with a 3H (Neutral, High Risk) rating
and a $17 price target. Reliant Resources is a diversified deregulated
energy provider, with businesses including power generation, wholesale
trading & marketing, and retail energy. In May of 2001, 20% of Reliant
Resources was offered to the public by parent REI-- a full spin is expected
during 1Q 2002. Our Neutral rating reflects (1) Reliant Resources'
inconsistent track record in their Merchant business & (2) their significant
leverage to commodity prices though their fast-growing generation portfolio.
Our analysis continues to show depressed forward power prices & spark
spreads across the U.S. in 2002/3. We used sum-of-the-parts and adjusted
present value analyses to derive our $17 price target for RRI.

 <<RRI.pdf>>

Peter Bisztyga
Associate
European Utilities Equity Research
Schroder Salomon Smith Barney
Tel: +44 20 7986 3932
Fax: +44 20 7986 4342
E-mail: peter.bisztyga@ssmb.com

Should you experience any problems opening this file, or if you wish to
receive SSSB Utilities e-mails on a sector-only, UK-only, European-only, or
named stock basis - or be removed from our list - please contact
natalie.knapp@ssmb.com.

If you wish to be added/removed from our hard copy research list, please
contact natalie.knapp@ssmb.com.

You can view this note and other Schroder Salomon Smith Barney Utility
research by using our equities website. If you do not have access to SSSB's
GEO (Global Equity Online) service, please contact natalie.knapp@ssmb.com.
or your salesperson who will arrange personal login and password details.

Additional information is available upon request.
Schroder Salomon Smith Barney ("SSSB"), and the companies within Citigroup,
including the Salomon Smith Barney group of companies ("the Firm"), may make
a market in the securities discussed in this text and may sell to or buy
from customers, as principal, securities recommended in this text.  The Firm
or employees preparing this text may have a position in securities or
options of any company recommended in this text.  An employee of the Firm
may be a director of a company recommended in this text.  The Firm may
perform or solicit investment banking or other services from any company
recommended in this text.  Within the past three years Schroder Salomon
Smith Barney, including its parent and/or affiliates, may have acted as
manager or co-manager of a public offering of any company mentioned in this
text.  Although information has been obtained from and is based upon sources
the Firm believes to be reliable, we do not guarantee its accuracy and it
may be incomplete or condensed.  All opinions and estimates constitute the
Firm's judgment as of the date of the text and are subject to change without
notice.  This text is for informational purposes only and is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of a security.  This text
has been approved for distribution in the United Kingdom by Salomon Brothers
International Limited, which is regulated by the Securities and Futures
Authority.  The investments and services contained herein are not available
to private customers in the UK.  This text does not take into account the
investment objectives or financial situation of any particular person.
Investors should obtain advice based on their own individual circumstances
before making an investment decision.  ? Salomon Smith Barney Inc., 2001.
All rights reserved.  Any unauthorized use, duplication or disclosure is
prohibited by law and may result in prosecution.  Please see our full
disclaimer on any current research document for further
restrictions/limitations.

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************
 - USUtils1.pdf
 - IPR Valuations Table Output.xls
 - US Power Prices 14 Jan 02.pdf
 - RRI.pdf


Today's IssueAlert Sponsors:

[IMAGE]

Utilities are experiencing tough franchise negotiations as cities link
undergrounding agreements to renewals of franchises. Communities apply
tremendous political pressure on utilities to underground systems in their
commercial as well as residential neighborhoods. SCIENTECH's "Electric
Utility Undergrounding" report analyzes existing undergrounding programs, and
provides an understanding of how regulatory bodies and utilities around the
country resolve this challenging problem.  If your company is involved in the
undergrounding of power lines, you need to read this report. View the table
of contents at: www.SCIENTECH.com/rci
[IMAGE]

Rapidpartsmart is the newest, most powerful online parts search engine in the
power industry. Rapidpartsmart is the complete source to locate, buy and sell
engineered parts worldwide. Rapidpartsmart integrates over 5 million supply
items into asset management and work management systems to ensure that you
know all supply sources, all the time. Rapidpartsmart increases supply
options, reduces outage risks and cuts inventory investment. Contact John
Kelly at (727) 669-3006 for more information or go to www.rapidpartsmart.com
[IMAGE]
The most comprehensive, up-to-date map of the North American Power Systemby
RDI/FT Energy is now available from SCIENTECH. The Wall Map measures 42" x
72"; the Executive Map Set consists of 18 11" x 17" maps. Visit our website
at www.scientech.comfor a detailed description of these valuable maps and
complete ordering instructions.

[IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
June 15, 2001

Kyoto Protocol Becomes New Albatross for Bush Administration

By Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis

[IMAGE]President Bush and European leaders "agreed to disagree" over a global
warming treaty, as the president sought to reassure allies that sharp policy
differences would not hamper relations between Europe and the United States.
During several closed-door sessions, Bush and his European counterparts
confronted one of their most contentious areas of disagreement: the
president's rejection of the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. "We agreed to
disagree," Swedish Prime Minister Goran Persson told reporters. "The European
Union is sticking to the Kyoto Protocol. The United States has chosen another
policy."

Analysis: It is rather amazing how prominently energy issues have factored
into the first six months of the Bush administration. In contrast to the
eight years of the Clinton administration, when energy policy often took a
backseat to other concerns, President Bush-a result of California blackouts,
a national shortage of natural gas, sky-high electricity prices, and a
controversial energy task plan-been comparatively consumed by energy issues.
Now, in a political legacy from the previous administration, President Bush
finds himself grappling with another contentious energy problem that has
global ramifications. Departing from what appears to be an international
consensus, President Bush has declared the Kyoto Protocol an ineffective
treaty and has instead decided to further examine the greenhouse gas problem,
which has raised further questions about the president's commitment to
environmental issues.

First, let me provide some background. The Kyoto Protocol developed out of
meetings held in December 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, during which time the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change agreed in principle to a
series of strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. About 170
governments of various countries, including the United States, participated
in the Protocol and agreed to reduce their aggregate carbon dioxide (CO2)
equivalent emissions by at least 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.
Noticeably exempt from the Protocol were developing countries such as China
and India-of the largest greenhouse gas emitters in the world&#151which
resisted taking on any sort of formal reduction plan until industrialized
countries proceeded with their own. This marked the central flaw in the
Protocol in that participants such as Europe, Japan and the United States
argued that it would be impossible to reach the Protocol's goals without the
active and controlled participation of developing countries. Consequently,
the United States could not garner two-thirds support from the Senate, which
would be required to ratify the Protocol, despite endorsement from the
Clinton administration. The United States is the largest emitter of CO2,
accounting for one-quarter of the world total per year, and thus its
participation in the Protocol has been considered essential.

The Protocol's emissions targets include all major greenhouse gases: carbon
dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide (NOx), and greenhouse gases created by
industrial processes, which are artificial chemicals called halocarbons
(CFCs, HFCs and PFCs) and long-lived gases such as sulphur hexafluoride
(SF6). The Protocol requires the main developed countries to reduce their
emissions of the greenhouse gases by varying amounts: 8 percent for European
Union countries, 7 percent for the United States and 6 percent for Japan.

With the onset of his new administration, President Bush announced last March
that the United States would not support the Kyoto Protocol, again arguing
that developing nations were not included and the goals were not realistic.
Further, Bush has voiced the concern that ratifying the Protocol would
severely damage the U.S. economy as it would restrict industrial production.
The president has also pointed out that, although European nations espouse
support for the Protocol, none of the EU members has yet to ratify the
treaty. Instead, President Bush has adopted a "go-slow" approach toward
global warming and has vowed to spend more money to investigate the problem
and work with other nations to produce a better plan.

A new report from the National Academy of Sciences, requested by the Bush
administration, found that global warming is indeed occurring as the result
of human activity. Specifically, the report found that the Earth's
temperatures could rise between 2.5 and 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of
this century. On the other hand, the report could not reliably establish how
much of the warming trends result from natural variations, how fast future
warming will occur or how corrective actions might correct it. Thus, the
president asserted that these unanswered questions warranted further
investigation into the greenhouse gas problem.

The president has come under fire both domestically and abroad for what is
perceived as a policy that gives preference to business over the environment.
In addition to his opposition to the Kyoto Protocol, President Bush also
announced in March that he opposes any domestic restrictions in CO2 emissions
from the nation's power plants, retracting on a pledge that he had made
during his campaign. Carbon dioxide is not classified as a pollutant by the
Clean Air Act, and thus the White House said that Bush's original promise was
a "mistake" inconsistent with the president's broader goal of increasing
domestic energy production. Toward that end, the Bush administration has
focused on the construction of some 1,900 new power plants across the country
to resolve a growing supply / demand imbalance. On the other hand, business
groups have applauded the president's approach, echoing his belief that the
Protocol would harm the nation's economy and that domestic, technology-based
solutions represent a better solution.

This is obviously a political story packed with passion on both sides of the
debate. I won't use this space to criticize or defend President Bush's
environmental stand. Instead, I think it will be useful to clearly identify
the two polarized approaches that world leaders are taking toward the Kyoto
Protocol. European leaders have vowed to enact the Protocol without the
United States, which may not be possible. The Protocol can only be enacted if
nations that produced 55 percent of the industrialized world's carbon dioxide
in 1990 decide to ratify it. Japan could be the wild card in the debate, as
it is leaning toward the Protocol but has not yet officially ratified it. If
Japan does participate, proponents of the Protocol would have 57.5 percent of
1990 emissions (enough for ratification).

Nevertheless, here is how the two approaches shake out:

The Bush Approach We were given the best indication of the approach President
Bush plans to take in his own environmental proposal (expected some time this
summer), in a recent radio address. "With new technology, sound regulation
and plain good sense, we can expand our energy production while protecting
the environment," the president said. The Bush administration's previously
released energy plan is primarily focused on building the nation's energy
supply through the expedited construction of new generation (including
nuclear power plants). Further, the president has said that "energy
production and environmental protection are not competing priorities" and can
both be achieved with new technology.

While the president has not made any specific references to new provisions
for limiting CO2 emissions from existing or new plants, the new technology to
which he has referred most likely includes clean-coal technologies that can
be implemented to reduce emissions from coal-fired plants. As noted in the
3/27/01 IssueAlert, new, clean-coal technologies are being tested and
developed by various companies throughout the United States. One example is
the integrated gasification-combined cycle (IGCC) technology that first
converts coal into a combustible gas, cleans the gas of virtually all
pollutants, then burns the gas in a turbine much like natural gas. More than
99 percent of sulfur, nitrogen and particulate pollutants can be removed in
the process. Three gasification power plants have been built in Florida,
Indiana and Nevada. As coal remains the United States' most abundant fuel
source, constituting 95 percent of our nation's fossil energy reserves, much
of the nation's plan for reducing emissions will focus on coal-fired
generation. It is important to note, however, that most of the clean-coal
technologies currently being developed eliminate SO2 pollutants and NOx, but
may do little to address CO2 emissions, which is the primary focus of the
Kyoto Protocol.

President Bush has also stated that his administration will fully fund high
priority areas for scientific research into climate change over the next five
years, and help developing nations such as China and India to match the U.S.
commitment.

The Kyoto Protocol Approach European Commission President Romano Prodi has
said that the 15 European Union countries will proceed with ratifying the
Kyoto Protocol. As noted, the participation of another large industrialized
country such as Japan is needed to officially enact the Protocol. If the
Protocol is enacted, an international conference will be held in Bonn,
Germany, this July to spell out how the specific goals of the treaty will be
reached. Toward this end, French President Jacques Chirac recently commented
that, "Now is not the time to conduct new studies. These studies have already
been done. We have to set objectives." Specifically, European countries will
proceed with setting specific and targeted cuts in their emission gases such
as CO2 produced by power plants powered by fossil fuels. The EU has said
that, if ratified, it will comply with the Protocol's standards for emissions
reduction by 2012 and go "significantly further" to reduce emissions beyond
that date. Yet, interestingly, across the Continent, nuclear power, which
produces no CO2 emissions, has undergone a resurgence and presently generates
an increasing percentage of the power in countries such as France and
Germany.

However, we have a good indication of the specific measures from negotiations
that took place during the Clinton administration. Most of the emissions
targets of the participating countries will be reached through
emission-trading mechanisms. Trading emission of greenhouse gases allows
industrialized countries to buy emissions rights from each other at a price
commonly agreed. In other words, industrialized countries that do not meet
emissions targets can strike deals with other industrialized nations that do
better than required. This may encourage reductions to be made where they are
most needed. However, critics have suggested that the mechanisms amount to
loopholes that would allow large polluting countries to continue polluting,
while smaller countries trade credits that do not amount to significant
reductions.

Moreover, the two approaches being pursued by President Bush and the European
Union represent inherently different philosophies regarding the urgency of
emissions control and methods that should be employed to reduce greenhouse
gases. There is little possibility that President Bush will change his stand
and include the United States in the Kyoto Protocol. Without U.S.
participation, the Protocol may once again be stalled unless another large
industrialized country such as Japan decides to join. On his own, President
Bush now moves forward with constructing a plan for the United States that
attempts to balance the reduction of emissions while aggressively expanding
the country's generation supply. This will be a difficult balance to achieve,
but the president remains confident that environmental protection and
industrial expansion do not need to be mutually exclusive.

An archive list of previous IssueAlerts is available at
www.scientech.com

Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
via e-mail or calling (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are also
available on our website.
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free,  daily IssueAlert. Let us
know if we can help you with  in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information  products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive our
free,  daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include  their full
name and email address or register directly on our site.

If you no longer wish to receive this daily e-mail, send a message to Issue
Alert, and include the word "delete" in the subject line.
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts(SM) are compiled based on the  independent analysis
of SCIENTECH consultants. The opinions expressed in  SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts
are not intended to predict financial performance  of companies discussed, or
to be the basis for investment decisions of any  kind. SCIENTECH's sole
purpose in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer  an independent perspective
regarding the key events occurring in the  energy industry, based on its
long-standing reputation as an expert on  energy issues.

Copyright 2001. SCIENTECH, Inc. All rights  reserved.


Yea, thanks for reminding me about your b-day, I nearly forgot (ha ha ha)!

I don't know if I should come to the big birthday bash b/c it is in a shady
area.

What do you think?

-e

Danielle Samson <DanielleS@JonesGranger.com> on 01/24/2000 10:11:38 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

Did you get the e-vite?


Heard from Allan Sommer today regarding the SAP licensing question:

? We do not need to amend our current SAP license agreement for the
outsourcing project as long as we are the caretakers of the data, i.e.
outside entities do not  access data within our environment, but rather
access an extract of the data from it.  This should work well with the
current plan.

Allan further suggested that we keep Kathy Kokas from his group posted on our
effort, in case our plan changes.  He also mentioned that their group may be
helpful in other ways.

Thanks,

Fred Philipson


please get on distribution and put on web site.   thanks.  Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/12/2001 12:56 PM -----

	Jez Peters
	02/12/2001 12:12 PM

		 To: Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peter
Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Samuel Grossman/LON/ECT@ECT, Pierre Aury/LON/ECT@ECT,
Chris Connelly/LON/ECT@ECT, Riaz Rizvi/LON/ECT@ECT, Manfred
Ungethum/LON/ECT@ECT, Sven Becker/FRA/ECT@ECT, John Moran/LON/ECT@ECT,
Cornelia Luptowitsch/LON/ECT@ECT, Scott Longmore/LON/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Cochran/LON/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth McCarthy/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Kearney/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephen Pirozzi/LON/ECT@ECT, Dimitri Taylor/LON/ECT@ECT, Kenny
Nicoll/LON/ECT@ECT, Lisa Kent/LON/ECT@ECT, Candace Parker/LON/ECT@ECT, Harry
Papadopoulos/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Mead/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karolina Potter/LON/ECT@ECT, Meindert Witteveen/LON/ECT@ECT, Ulf
Ek/LON/ECT@ECT, Louis Redshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Niamh Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Ivan Van
Niekerk/EU/Enron@Enron, Bruce Chu/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shamim
Ali/LON/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Lenny Hochschild/NA/Enron@Enron, Katrina Bensadon/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Asplin/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Weekly Coal Report

SUMMARY

ATLANTIC

Mixed signals coming from the market at present with Billiton approaching us
to buy FOB stem at RBCT for a cargo each Q2/Q3 and were active for the first
time in a while in the SECA market buying up 2nd half 2001 material.
Meanwhile there remains to be South African resell tonnage coming our way -
predominantly appearing by way of the Spanish utilities who continue to have
excellent hydro levels and ourability to source South African Call Options on
FOB RBCT level with strike of $32.50 seems to question the recent information
that Billitonsold tonnage at $33.25 equivalent into European consumers for
the rest of the year Furthermore for the first time this year we begin to see
Colombian resell material appearing on the market both on a CIF and FOB basis
- probably no coincidence that this comes at a time when some of the steam
seems to have come off the U.S. spot market. Overall the tone seems to be
firmer but with very few new fundamental inputs to fuel this but rather
producer sentiment  After weeks of tentatively drifting south the SECA market
traded up a dollar along the whole curve last week. This was really a
consequence of a few looking to buy into a market void of sellers which was
itself is directly a function of peoples unwillingness to further sponsor a
market which has come down some $5 from it's high's. The spot market is now
trading at $40.50 Fob barge Rotterdam, 2nd half of the year at $40.25 and
then 2002 at $39.50.

PACIFIC

Despite the extensive coverage which the Far East seems to be attracting with
regards to economic slowdowns/weakness the Pacificmarket continues to be
tight. The JSM/Producers continue their annual negotiations, but expect to
see few conclusions from these in theshort term as the JSM's continue to
exercise all the options they have to keep the drip feed going and most have
clauses in their contractswhich allow them to carry on shipping material
despite any agreement until September time. Both KEPCO and Lafarge have come
out with tenders for the delivery of coal for prompt shipment - it is
definitely a sign of progress that we are being invited to bid but without
any length with which to play with, going short in front of Glencore and Rio
could be expensive - the plan will be to participate without winning the
business. The Chinese Annual Coal Fair took place over the last cuppla weeks
where contracts for 2001 are negotiated and various sectors lobbyfor their
allocation on infrastructure. The major takeaway's from the meeting were that
total production is estimated at 950 million mt for 2001with exports targeted
at 63 million mt - up 5 million mt from last year. Despite increased export
targets, the sentiment remains bullish with most producers asking between $29
and $31 representing a $3/$4 increase versus 2000 prices. Strong domestic
prices will limit any downside in the export market and while the government
is keen to keep pushing exports there is a general  scepticism over the
ability of the rail to move the projected tonnage. We have signed a
Memorandum of Understanding with a producer based in Inner Mongolia (ZCIC)to
market upto 1 million mt per year into the export market - all going well
this will provide us with the necessary length to be able to target business
in the region more aggressively.

GAMEPLAN

We continue to try and take advantage of this mismatch between the origin
markets and the European market by selling out of origin lengthand using the
resell market to pick up tonnage to service our commitments at destination.
We are working several bits of long-term destinationbusiness in the Atlantic
which if successful will serve as a melting pot for any length we have
remaining in that basin and more. We will alsolook to sell into any further
rally in the destination SECA mkt. Despite fundamentals in Asia pointing to a
slowdown in demand the consolidation we are seeing in Australia will
certainly prevent any collapse in prices and short-term expect prices to head
higher than the $30 I wud call FOB Newcastle today. It will be very difficult
for us to get any ammunition for the near-term but we are looking at various
projects which will again give us access to coal further out in the curve and
at the same time are exploring any opportunity to own some optionality to
give us some protection against a continued squeeze further out in the curve.

Best Regards
Jez


Attached you will find the outstanding PMA's, as of March 2001 accounting.
You will see adjustments requested by financial settlements. They have
finally provided us with reconciliation's for the contract periods of Dec00
through Feb01. Financial settlements thought that reconciling current months
and working backwards would be best. So, you should continue to see PMA's,
from financial settlements, for previous months as they become available to
us. Please let me know if you have any questions.
;
Thanks!
Shannon McPearson
Enron North America
713-853-5944
Shannon.McPearson@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2000
01:10 PM ---------------------------

"Martin Jermakyan" <martin@electrapartners.com> on 04/24/2000 09:59:38 AM
Please respond to "Martin Jermakyan" <martin@electrapartners.com>
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: My resume

Dear Vince,

Attached please find an updated resume of mine.

I have been continuing my research in the area of pricing, risk management
and asset management of power industry.  It seems to me that the framework I
have been working on does allow addressing some fundamental issues and
allows describing the salient features of power markets.  I feel a brief
info may inform you what have I been up to.

Conceptually speaking, my approach relies on the understudying that the
absence of cash and carry implies non-hedgibility of the most fundamental
building blocks of power market - forward contracts of hourly duration.
This clearly demands a risk premium embedded in power prices.  I have been
able to develop a machinery to capture this risk premium, and calculate its
impact on pricing of other products.  In particular, the method allows
consistent generation of hourly forward curve (per each geographic region),
hence generation of forward curves of longer duration.  It provides us not
only with forward curves, but also their physical (not risk-neutral)
distribution.  It also allows one to analyze the sensitivity of the forward
curve with respect to the volumetric risk.  As a fundamental  input ,  I
consider the ratio of properly compounded generation output (load) and the
corresponding maximum available generation supply.  The first one is well
observable and forecastable due to its stationarity.  The second one  is
defined by the first one and the generation and transmission profile of the
region.  Much of the required information is in the public domain.

The market price of risk incorporated in the model depends on this ratio and
the calendar time.  This time dependence of the market price of risk allows
capturing of the dynamics of the returns per unit risk over time, and its
dependence on the ratio mentioned above reflects the intuition and the
reality that closer the demand to the maximum available supply higher
compensation do the investors expect.

I have also realized that the transmission related factors may be
incorporated into this framework in a very consistent and robust manner.

This approach also allows quantification of the margins as a stochastic
process dependent on the volumetric factors, among other things.  It allows
posing and solving the problem of maximization of the margins while keeping
their variance under control in a very elegant and robust way.

I have developed the first version of mathematical tools and prototype
software reflecting all these issues.  My inability to complete this program
has been resulted from the severe instability, lack of access and the cash
flow problems I have experienced in the last few years.  I have also
understood that programs of this magnitude cannot be finished from the
"grandpa's garage."

Nevertheless, I think I have developed a very systematic and robust
understanding and methodology, and at least, I have convinced myself that
this approach leads to a comprehensive system.

With all this said, I don't want to make an impression of a stiff person,
who has his agenda and under any circumstances is willing to push it
forward.  I have always been very flexible, and in my consulting experience,
I have always accommodated the needs and wishes on my clients.  In my short
period of employment with Altra I have been very ethical, I have played by
the rules, I have done whatever I have been asked to do, and have been a
team player.  The reasons they have asked me to resign have nothing to do
with me personally.  They have been respectful to me, they have valued me as
capable person, but have found that given the direction of the company
(which has become self-evident with the consequent developments), "further
Altra goes, further I will be frustrated with where they go."  It was almost
formulated that it is better for me to separate from Altra as soon as I can.
As an evidence of appreciation, they have continued paying me as of today,
something that they have not done for some others, but it is coming to its
end, too.  I am bringing this up just to reiterate that my separation from
Altra has had nothing to do with me or my entrepreneurial working style vs.
corporate style, etc.  I have no doubts that I can function equally well in
either environment.

I wish that your presentation goes well with your new superior, and that my
joining Enron becomes a possibility.

Regards,
Martin

 - martin.doc


hey, give me a call when you get a minute

joe
39636


Attached are clean versions of the most up to date documents.  The confirm
also includes a redline copy with the changes we discussed this morning.

Please note that Calpine needs to execute the following documents:

1.  Capacity Release and Assignment Agreement
2.  Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement
3.  Guaranty by Calpine Corporation (Included as Exhibit to Enfolio Master
Agreement)
4.  Transaction No. 1 to Enfolio (the Confirm)

Please let me know if you have any questions.


I had Calpine Power Services Company shut down for financial, and we got the
master in signed, so I am going to open them up.  Can you add them to
tomorrow's list.

Thanks!


Two of two comments received.

Andrew S. Katz, Director Industry Legal Affairs
Edison Electric Institute
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20004
Voice:  202-508-5616
Fax:     202-508-5673
e-mail:  akatz@eei.org
 - TEXT.htm
Received: from mail.acespower.com (aces-229.iquest.net [206.53.252.229]) by
mail.eei.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2001 15:05:36 -0400
Received: by ACESEX01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <M2CR7RSZ>;
Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:10:11 -0500
Message-ID: <52C0BE7FBF4BD411A6B100508B5EB720494148@ACESEX01>
From: Lou Vitale <LouV@acespower.com>
To: "Andy Katz (E-mail)" <andykgc@eei.org>
Subject: Collateral Annex
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:10:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Andy

Perhaps we could clarify the following issues at our next meeting:

* Is there a difference between credit assurances and performance
assurances?
* Is a guarantee considered a credit assurance or a performance
assurance?
* In sections 8.1 (c) and 8.2 (c), I am not sure that a margin call is
clearly defined. I believe that initial performance/credit assurance such as
a guarantee to support a collateral threshold should be excluded from this
definition, otherwise you would be reducing the overlimit amount by the
amount of the guarantee posted at the time of contract execution.

Your comments would be appreciated.

Regards

Lou Vitale
ACES Power Marketing LLC
Ph:  317- 344-7111
Fax: 317- 344-7001
Cell: 317- 696-9466
email: louv@acespower.com

 - Andy Katz.vcf


Please contact Tana Jones at X33399.  She is the paralegal who would know if
a contract was executed.

Matilda Machado
04/27/2001 12:17 PM
To: Georgi Landau/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Executed ISDA

Hi Ladies,

I'm trying to find a contact in your legal department to verify if an ISDA
was created/executed yesterday or not?  One of our traders has asked us to
send out some confirmations on a counterparty that is not in Global CP, yet
he tells us that an ISDA was finalized yesterday?????  Thanks,

Matilda


Hola...
Tammie I want to thank Louise and yourself for the beautiful flowers you
sent me..... I really apreciate all your attentios to me.

About the painting you can make the deposit to my mom?s US account
Bank: Wells Fargo,Bank Texas, N.A.
Under her name: Diana Morales de Martinez
acct # is 027-4729060

Thank you very much and talk to you on Monday....

PDT. Loise: I?m happy you liked your painting.... Tammie?s yours is almost
on the way. Louise: and the other for your home the "yellow" one will be
finished for the beginning of January. Those are gifts!

_________________________________________________________________
Con MSN Hotmail s?mese al servicio de correo electr?nico m?s grande del
mundo. http://www.hotmail.com/ES


Investment Technology Group Limited (ITGL) -
I've e-mailed twice and phone once.

Lotus Notes - The software has been loaded on my computer but it crashes my
system.   I've been told that it should be resolved today.

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 10/25/00 08:33AM >>>

Jason:  Which files have you left messages for Mark Elliott?  Have you
emailed and phoned?  Are you up and running on Lotus Notes?  SS

                    "JASON PETERS"
                    <PETEJ@andrews-        To:     <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
                    kurth.com>             cc:
                                           Subject:     Re: SIA Form 151 -
mandatory arbitration
                    10/24/2000
                    05:57 PM

(1) I have a message into Mark Seffinger at ING Barings with respect to
item 1.

(2) I left a message with Mark Elliott.  I still have not heard from him.

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 10/24/00 05:32PM >>>
Jason:  (1)  You were going to verify whether or not arbitration (for the
executing brokers) is mandatory.  Have you heard anything?

(2)  Did you ever speak with Mark Elliott about ITG?  Are you still having
problems connecting with him?

Sara


TO: ENA Vision and Values Committee

Brian Redmond asked that this summary be forwarded to all team members.  I
apologize if you are no longer a member of the ENA Vision and Values Team.
Having just replaced Elisabeth McCabe as head of Public Relations, I am using
the most recent list of team members I can find.

Please contact me, if you are no longer a member of the ENA Vision and Values
Team.  Thanks.

Below summarizes the key points of our May 17 meeting:
>
>Executive Committe Presentation
>    Overall, the initiatives identified in the presentation were
>    well-received by the Executive Committee.
>    Thanks to all of the presenters for delivering a clear and concise
>    message.
>    The final presentation is attached.
>
>P&D
>    Two pilots are planned between now and the end of May.
>    GPG has additional ideas for pilots.
>    The Ad Agency has submitted a marketing and communication plan.  Review
>    of the proposal is underway.
>
>Communication Training
>    The goal of this initiative is to increase the enrollment of
>    participants in the course, Impact and Influence.  Sessions were
>    recently completed in London and Houston.
>    Currently, we are using data received in the Impact and Influence
>    training to develop program design for follow-up training.
>    We have received a proposal from Cognitive Arts for on-line
>    communications training.
>    Once this training rolls out, we'll need all V&V reps and business unit
>    heads to encourage participation of employees to complete the training.
>
>Communication Tools
>    Phase I of the One Enron directory is on target for July 2000.  The
>    basics, name, phone number, functional org chart, title, etc,. are
>    expected to be included in Phase I.
>    Since it is the responsibility of the individual to update the
>    directory, please encourage your business unit employees to populate
>    GIS.  GIS can be accessed from the Enron intranet home page.
>    Currently, the e-mail policy is under review.
>    The second half of 2000 will be spent on raising the level of awareness
>    on the proper use of technology tools.
>    The Technology Showcase is scheduled for Friday, May 19, in the Enron
>    lobby.
>
>Internal Communication Campaign
>    Posters are now in the Houston Enron building and Three Allen Center.
>    We are in process of translating the posters in Spanish and Portuguese.
>    Offices around the world should receive posters over the next 30 days.
>    Interesting facts about Enron will be on practical products throughout
>    the summer.
>    Post-it notes with quotes about Communication will be distributed to
>all
>    employees worldwide in about 2 weeks.
>    Additional post-it notes will be available on the office supply order
>    form.
>
>Excellence Through Communication
>    Please continue to work with your business units to identify action
>    plans to respond to feedback in ETC.
>    Please include employee communication as part of your plan.  We want to
>    be sure that our efforts are tied back to the employee feedback
>received
>    on ETC.
>
>Diversity
>    Dick Leibert asked each business unit representative to identify 10
>    employees to participate in Diversity Focus Groups.  An e-mail
>    explaining the effort and the process will be coming from Dick shortly.
>
>Best Companies Survey
>    The survey from Fortune is coming sometime this summer.
>    Please encourage comments about worklife experiences be shared in the
>    survey.
>    There was a suggestion in the meeting to market our ranking on the list
>    similar to Continental Airlines.  Discussion continues on this idea.
>
>Other
>    We are in the process of pulling together Ken Lay's nomination for
>    Executive Communicator of the Year.


Thanks for your help with solving this discrepancy, we finally got CPS to agree with our numbers.

Thanks again,
MJ

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillips, George
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:30 PM
To: Forney, John M.; Capasso, Joe
Cc: Jacobson, Michael
Subject: RE: Constellation Dispute

Deal number 815970 was a sale to Constellation as follows:

25 MWs
$17
Traders name:  Tyler
HE 23
South Zone

Please leave me a message if I can answer any other questions.

John/Joe - I am not certain of Michael Jacobson's e-mail address from home- could please forward this message.

-----Original Message-----
From: Forney, John M.
Sent: Mon 11/5/2001 3:14 PM
To: Phillips, George; Capasso, Joe
Cc:
Subject: FW: Constellation Dispute

Can you guys check this out?  Constellation is an important counterparty and we want to get them an answer pretty soon.   Im sure you guys are correct,  but if you can provide  some detail about their trader name,  etc.  that would be helpful.

Thanks

JMF
 -----Original Message-----
From:   Jacobson, Michael
Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 2:57 PM
To:     Forney, John M.
Subject:        RE: Constellation Dispute

The deal number is 815970.1 - under your name but I think that it is Eric's.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Forney, John M.
Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 2:24 PM
To:     Jacobson, Michael
Subject:        RE: Constellation Dispute

sure,  who is the trader listed on the deal?

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Jacobson, Michael
Sent:   Monday, November 05, 2001 2:19 PM
To:     Forney, John M.
Cc:     Grace, Rebecca M.
Subject:        Constellation Dispute

JMF,

Constellation is disputing this sale we show to them in EnPower as well as the Hourly P&L.  I have nothing to give them for support, can you help me out or at least pass this along to whomever did the deal?

10/11/01 HE 23 50 mw @ $17

Thanks,
MJ


I think harassing me is a very popular pass time around here.

Gabriel Monroy
02/20/2001 10:08 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:

hey, not much here.  None of my bosses are here, however, Tim left me some
work to do and I am having a hard time comparing my results to what the
analysts say they should be.  Tim would be disappointed if this is not
finished by tomorrow. At least that is what I think, so I am keeping myself
busy.  I have time to check my e-mail though, so keep writing.   For example,
you can lie to me about how beautiful Lake Charles is, oopsss.  I think Jeff
enjoys harassing you very very much.

Anyways, if you find something interesting to tell me, let me know.


Recently, 4 parking spots have become available at the World Trade Center as
part of Enron's lease.   We will begin to allocate these spots based on the
following criteria and establish a waiting list that will be managed by the
Portland office for any future spots.

1.  Any employee who was full-time ENA (or Portland transition company) on or
before November 30, 1998 (tenure in office, time must be consecutive).
2.  Any employee who has been identified as being on a waiting list for WTC
spots.

We have identified the following list of employees who meet the above
criteria.

Bob Badeer
Heather Dunton
Caroline Emmert
Carla Hoffman
Stewart Rosman
Julie Sarnowski
Cara Semperger
Brett Hunsucker
Murray O'Neil
Les Rawson
Jeff Richter
Donald Robinson
Chris Stokley
Mike Etringer
Diana Scholtes
Sean Crandall
John Malowney
Phil Platter
Karen Jones
Jan King
Jim Gilbert
Kathy Axford

If your name is not listed and you meet the above criteria, please see Amy
FitzPatrick by close of business Friday, March 16th.

A drawing will then be held to determine the order in which the spots will be
allocated.  Once this list is exhausted, we will continue to build the
waiting list based on tenure in the Portland office.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Thanks!
Amy


House power subcommittee.

Mary Hain@ECT
08/29/2000 04:03 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Dr. Robert Michaels as panelist at field hearing?

Are you talking about a FERC hearing?  If so I think Tim should talk.  If not
who and what are you talking about?

Jeff Dasovich@EES
08/29/2000 01:41 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Dr. Robert Michaels as panelist at field hearing?

Rob had Robert Michaels give me a ring re: potential panelist at the field
hearing.  Be happy to pitch him to Ms Van Way.  Thoughts?


Mary:
On the list that was dated as of 3/28, am I correct in assuming that Bankers
Trsut International PLC and Sutton Bridge Financing Limited are not
counterparties whose trades were conformed using the Annex A Omnibus
Confirmation?

Carol


Frontera has scheduled the following for tomorrow:

he 7-11,   350 mw's
he 12-22,  400 mw's
he 23, 50 mw's

We will be required to sell an additional 85 mw's tomorrow for hour ending 23 in order to get up to the minimum run of 135mw's.
If Frontera has problems coming up tomorrow,  there may be an ACE issue.

We will advise.

JMF


Please find attached this week's report from Government and Regulatory
Affairs.

Thanks - Sharon


Did you ever get the check I sent?
 And where is the article you owe me?
 Click the link!!!

Jeff Pesot
GA Options,LLC
212 947 3337
212 947 3339 fax
646 522 2528 cell
jpesot@gaoptions.com
www.gaoptions.com


Vince-

Here is the basic idea I was alluding to:

Suppose a car dealer promised to "match any advertised price." Then his
competitor would feel the need to respond in kind. And so on, until all
dealers advertised they would "match any advertised price." Now, consider one
of these dealer's decision to perhaps lower his prices. If he does so,
everyone will immediately match his price, so his market share will remain
unchanged, at whatever it was before, but his revenues (and all other dealers
as well) would be lowered by the amount of his price reduction. So, the
dealer rationally decides not to lower his prices to try to sell more cars.

Now, suppose a limited partnership, where the partners contract to "control"
who they are in business with, by putting a "right of first refusal" clause
into the partnership's papers, whereby any partner wishing to sell his
interests must offer the remaining partners the right to match any offer the
partner received from outside for his shares. Now, suppose you are an
outsider, considering doing your due diligence in the thought you might want
to buy into the partnership. You know if your offer is a "good" one from your
perspective, offering you the prospects of a fair rate of return, the
existing partners will match it, and you will get nothing in the deal but you
will have paid, from your own pocket, for your due diligence. Conversely, if
you offer too much for the shares, then the other partners will not match
your offer and you will then realize you overpaid. In neither case can you
credibly assume you know more about the business than do the current
partners. So, you (basically) don't make an offer.  So, a partner's shares
are seriously devalued by his partners having the right to match any offers
he receives for them. The "right of first refusal" clause precludes
economically efficient rebalancing of portfolios by rendering the shares
(essentially) illiquid.

Clayton


Basnea Corp.
Basne Energy Management
DeviaOne


The attached letter was sent to the House leadership and the Chairman and
Ranking Members of the House Committees on Agriculture, Commerce,  Rules, and
Banking, under Ken Lay's signature.


Attached is the red lined draft of the Gas management Agreement with the
changes we discussed. Please review and give me your comments. If you can
supply any of the needed Notice info in Section 8 please let me know---


PADI Americas
30151 Tomas Street, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688-2125
800-729-7234, or +1 949 858-7234
http://www.padi.com
-------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or change your email address, please go to
http://www.padi.com/fun/email/default.asp
-------------------------------------------------

Dear Fellow Diver;

Ok, ok, I know I said I'd do better job of getting these out on time, but now you can stop sending me emails asking when the next newsletter is coming out!  Here's a quick update. We've added about 11,000 new fellow divers to this month's newsletter, which brings us up to about 260,000 PADI Divers worldwide, making this the most widely read newsletter in the industry!

From the entry-level certification numbers we're seeing, you're all doing your part by  bringing many new divers into our great sport.  Please keep up the good work.  However, PADI and the diving industry do need your help in another way.  Recently, an Associated Press article, based on a study by the National Sporting Goods Association, was released saying that US participation in scuba diving fell way off in 2000.  I know it's not true because PADI's numbers were up and we represent the lion's share of the market.  So how can you help?  When you're asked to participate in any market survey,  please take a minute to answer the questions and let them know you are not only a diver, but also a PADI diver. When they ask about activities, name scuba.

About a month ago, the Regional Managers (that's our great team of sales/training people who visit retailers and resorts), for PADI Americas had a great sales meeting on Orcas Island in Washington.  We all worked hard and dived hard while we were there.  We stayed at the Rosario Resort (a really cool place by the way!)(http://www.rosarioresort.com)  and would like to thank Ron Kenny from Island Dive and Water Sport for showing us a great time and some fantastic diving. If you're in the area, or just want to dive with a giant octopus, give Ron a call.  Great customer service and good times are guaranteed. Check out Island Dive and Water Sport at www.divesanjuan.com. Be sure to tell Ron that I told you about his operation. I love it when PADI retail and resort operators call me to say someone mentioned the Dear Fellow Diver Newsletter to them!

I'd also like to thank all of you who took the time to review the consultation document  (http://www.padi.com/news/archive/last/052901_wargraves/ ) online and responded in favor of allowing responsible wreck diving, while respecting our underwater cultural heritage.  PADI on behalf of the diving industry at large is making progress on this subject and will keep you informed.

What are you doing from 26-31 July? Well, if you happen to be in Australia, swing by the Sydney Boat Show and say hello to our team from the PADI Asia Pacific office and visit all of our hard working resort and retail members exhibiting there.  This is the largest boat show in the Southern Hemisphere and this year it has a Dive Expo area. Check it out at www.sydneyboatshow.com.au. and be sure to tell the PADI staff at the show that you read about it in this newsletter.
If you've recently checked the PADI homepage, you may have seen a very historic dive industry news item (http://www.padi.com/padi/offices/americas/news/todaynews/062701_historique/). On 13 June 2001, PADI and the F?d?ration Fran?aise d'?tudes et de Sports Sous-Marin (FFESSM/French Federation) agreed to work together in developing France's dive industry. The historic accord represents the start of mutual cooperation for the benefit of France's dive industry and divers worldwide.   Jean-Claude Monachon, CEO PADI Europe, summed it up best by saying, "You can come to France and dive, that's important. Divers from Europe and around the world can come to this country and experience our fabulous diving. That benefits both France and diving."

A little over a month ago, the youth chamber of commerce (JCE) from Fr?jus / St. Rapha?l, France conducted a beach cleanup that attracted a lot of media attention.  All summer long in the port of St. Rapha?l on the Mediterranean, Project AWARE pamphlets are being passed out to divers and visitors alike.  Good job to everyone involved!
The Protect the Living Reef initiative is a big success with many Project AWARE Patrons (https://www.padimembers.com/Sforms/aware/default.htm) requesting brochures, stickers and lapel pins.  The new manual, A.W.A.R.E. Our World, Our Water (http://www.padi.com/aware/get_involved/LivingReef/news/022601_ourworld_ourwater/) is really taking off as well. If you haven't read it yet, go by your PADI Dive Center or Resort and get your copy today.  And, don't forget the deadline for the Project AWARE Photo Contest (http://www.padi.com/aware/photo_2001/ ) is July 31st.
Now, get your calendar out and circle September 15th. Then, visit your PADI Dive Center or Resort and find out how you can participate in this year's International Clean-Up Day.  It's not too early to begin working with your local dive facility or organizing your own cleanup.  For details on any of the global Project AWARE programs, visit http://www.padi.com/aware/.
I am buying drinks again this year at the PADI Diving Society's Total Submersion event in Grand Cayman 8-15 November (http://www.padi.com/ptn/weeklyspecial/).  I will be there for the first few days, so if you catch me there and tell me you're a Dear Fellow Diver Newsletter reader, I'll buy you a drink (underage readers get soda!) We've already got more people going than last year, so don't delay, book your trip now!  Visit your PADI Dive Center or Resort, or contact PADI Travel Network for details.

Last but not least, for you last minute travelers, it's not too late to join Bob Coleman, Director of Marketing and Malene Thompson, Manager of Public Relations for PADI Americas during Cayman Country http://www.padi.com/padi/offices/americas/news/travelnews/070201_cometocaymancountry/, August 1-5 and 8-12. Country music stars (and PADI divers) Travis Tritt, The Wilkinsons, Rascal Flats (winner of the Country Music Association's Best New Group) and SheDaisy are scheduled to perform, along with favorites the Kinleys and Chris Cagle.  Again, contact your PADI Dive Center or PADI Travel Network to make it happen. If you run into Bob, be sure to tell him you read the Dear Fellow Diver Newsletter. He might just have something for you!

Are you going diving this weekend?  If not, please do me one more favor. Take this newsletter into your local PADI facility and tell them Brian said to stop by and ask what's new?  They will not only appreciate the visit, but while you're there you can begin planning your next dive adventure, check out the latest in dive equipment or move up the diving ladder by signing up for your next PADI course!

Now, get a friend and go diving!

Brian Cronin.


Attached is the revised summary of the recommendations coming out of the Diversity Subcommittee.  If there are additional comments, please feel free to pass them on.

Is is also my understanding that Jeff is working with Andrea and Michelle regarding the "metrics'' accumulated with respect to diversity performance with a focus on verification, context, and presentation so as to supplement our recommendations.  In that regard (and after discussing with Kirk), we should begin organizing a formal presentation for the OTC of these materials.  One approach may be as follows:

(1) Convert the Recommendations and Metrics into approximately 5 slides: (a) Slide 1-Overview; (b) Slide 2-What type of data was used as support and why; (c) Slide 3-  Presentation of the metrics and what we believe that data is indicating; (d) Review of Recommendations/Action Items and the supporting Business Case; and (e) Next Steps.

(2) Identify and present key metrics; identify backup slides with data points.

I am hopeful that we can finalize these items in the next week so we can review with Cindy in early October and be prepared to meet with the OTC sometime in October.
Please let me know your thoughts and suggestions.  Thank you for your time.

Jordan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forsyth, Darlene C.
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:46 PM
To:	Mintz, Jordan
Subject:	Diversity Points Presentation


I've sent JRigby the execution versions of the break out contract and the
override letter.  I've asked him to call me to discuss.

FYI: The turbine contract was originally drafted by Brian Barto, then Kathy
Clark took over.  Scott Dieball (EECC Legal) was actively involved in the
negotiations, as was I. In facct, it was the first deal I worked on after I
transferred to ENA from EECC.

Kay

From: Roseann Engeldorf on 01/05/2001 12:39 PM
To: Lisa Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron,
dgholke@skadden.com, "ROB TAYLOR" <TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: Re: ESA Documents needed to complete the Eletrobolt EPC

No - he wants to see the breakout, but generally the commercial ts and cs are
the same.  The breakout should be different only insofar as technical-type
changes were made to accommodate a smaller "batch" of turbines and certain
other site-specific changes.  The "override" letter contains the financing
type changes that need to be in these "surrogate purchaser" deals.  The idea
is that once the financing entities are out of the picture and we want to
sell the facility, the breakout turbine purchase agreement can be assigned to
the new owner without the funky "overrride letter" requirements.

Brett's question went to whether EECC would be critical of the commercial
deal terms, because, oddly enough, EECC has historically been the point
organization for all power asset purchases within Enron - whether the
purchase was ultimately for an ENA, ESA or EECC/NEPCO project.  In this case,
Brett can be assured that EECC had its input into the commercial terms last
May, when Kay Mann (ENA power development lawyer) worked with Katherine Clark
(an EECC contracts administrator) on the deal.

Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks,

Rose

	Lisa Alfaro@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	01/05/2001 12:30 PM

		 To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, "ROB TAYLOR"
<TAYLR@andrews-kurth.com>@ENRON, Mary Kimball/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: ESA Documents needed to complete the Eletrobolt EPC

So he doesn't want to see the breakout?  Only the original purchase agreement?


Sorry I've been MIA this week...new job and all.  Thought you might get a
kick out of this email.  It's from that guy that is 25 but looks about 40.
And yet he resurfaces again (read the email at the bottom first then his).

Yes I will be attending the Taster's dinner this evening.  Look forward to
seeing you there.

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2000 01:51
PM ---------------------------

Stephen Plauche@ENRON
03/30/2000 01:11 PM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Take me out to the ...

Susan,
 I find that you have a midly attractive sense of humor and a cynical side to
you that separates you from the rest of the tribe.  Its funny you mentioned
the Astros game.  I was actually thinking of inviting you (since I have two
tickets to tonight's game and all) but you have turned me down so many times
in the past I decided to go with a more conservative pick.  Anyhow, since I
absolutely detest Woody's and all of my bold suggestions for other venues
consistently gets dissed by the group's brain trust, please take me off of
this distribution list.  Have a nice day.

Steve

Susan M Scott@ECT
03/30/2000 12:38 PM
To: val.generes@ac.com, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Norton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Benjamin
Freeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shanna
Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Yvette Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dan
Feather/Enron_Development@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick
Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Misti Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Heather Alon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hang Bui/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kreg Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Kolman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mason Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Reside/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin
Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nicholas J
Stephan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wilson
Kriegel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Take me out to the ...

Oh wait, I can't go to the ball game because I couldn't take a day off from
work to stand in the Enron lobby (or send my secretary to do it for me).

For all of you who have managed to snag tickets for tonight's game
congratulations and you suck.  For the rest of us stuck out in the cold I
suggest the only viable alternative before us is to drown our sorrows in a
cold bottle of beer (or two, or three...).  I realize the mass email has been
MIA the last two weeks.  For some this may have been a welcomed relief.  For
others there may have been some concern that they had been cut-off from the
distribution.  At present no one has been removed from the distribution, but
it is undergoing an audit.  Should it be determined that it is necessary to
remove an individual from the list for any reason that individual will be
notified and given an explanation.  If anyone would like to know the causes
for expulsion you can write to:  I CAN'T BELIEVE ANYONE CARES IF THERE ON
THIS DISTRIBUTION OR NOT BECAUSE THE ONLY PLACE WE SEEM TO GO IS WOODY'S
EVERY THURSDAY BETWEEN 9:30 AND 10:00.

On that note, see you guys at Woody's tonight around 9:30 or 10:00.


[IMAGE] 	Search  Delayed Quote RT Quote Charting Earnings Ratings Competition Key Ratios Financials Insiders
	 TOOLS  [IMAGE] MAPS  [IMAGE] STOCKS  [IMAGE] FUNDS  [IMAGE] PERSONALFINANCE  [IMAGE] ECONOMY& BONDS

[IMAGE]	     At the End of the Day Today's Market      DJIA 9865.75 UP 25.67 Nasdaq 1943.91 UP 6.21 S?500 1133.06 DOWN -.22 Rus 2000 481.28 UP 1.93 10 Yr Bd 5.08 ? 0.00 DJTA 2804.84 UP 24.92 FTSE 100 5223.60 UP 30.60 H. Seng 10767.50 DOWN -5.50 Nik. 225 10220.80 UP 76.70 DAX 5159.02 UP 2.39 Today's Sectors     Basic Materials -0.06 %    Utilities -0.77 %    Communication 0.37 %   Consumer Staples 0.21 %  Capital Goods -0.36 %  Energy -0.36 %    Financial -0.67 %  Consumer Cyclicals 0.97 %   Health Care -0.5 %   Technology 0.61 %   Transport 0.45 %   (Mouse over for detail, click to launch Map of the Market) January 28, 2002  The Closing Bell Stocks Not Getting Extra Credit  By Igor Greenwald An earnings miss by Amex and another telecom bankruptcy added to the financial sector's woes, largely offsetting resilient sales of homes and autos. Daily Briefing  Stocks to Watch   Today's Top Stories [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Tradecraft Enron and Triumph of Free Markets[IMAGE]  [IMAGE] By Jonathan Hoenig [IMAGE] Trust the press and the politicians to come to exactly the wrong conclusions about this debacle.  [IMAGE] The Data Mine Cash on the Hoof  By Cintra Scott Want to buy more profitability for less? We serve up a dozen stocks that look cheap based on their underlying free cash flow. [IMAGE] On the Street How Not to Invest in the Next Enron  By Matthew Goldstein Much of the truth about Enron was hiding in plain sight. Financial statements give telltale signs of trouble ? if you know what to look for.   More Articles    Advertisement [IMAGE]  BIG EVENT In YOUR Living Room! Featuring LIFE sized action in EPIC proportions. The closest thing to actually being there!  ENTER HERE  TO WIN:50" HDTV PLASMA FLAT SCREEN TELEVISION - $15,999 USD value!  --  Lightweight, Ultra-Thin Design --  160o Wide Viewing Angle --  16.77 Million Colors or XEROX PHASER(R) 860 NETWORK COLOR PRINTER  Mutual Fund News [IMAGE] Week in Funds Dancing on the Edge  By Dawn Smith A more positive Fed chairman pulled the market to its feet this week, helping most stock funds trim their losses. [IMAGE] Fund FAQs A Cooler Head (Usually) Prevails  By June Kim I'm considering replacing my poor-performing Janus Mercury fund with another in its category. Which one should I pick?    More Articles    Advertisement Haven't refinanced yet?  Take advantage of the lowest mortgage rates in years.  Save big with IndyMac Bank, the #1 rated mortgage website by Gomez.com the last 4 quarters.  IndyMac Bank guarantees to beat, not meet, any mortgage by $300.  Click below for a free quote: http://quinst.com/clk/ausachenzurtzworiensper   Breaking News Travel Slump Hurts American Express  Global Crossing Files Bankruptcy  Xerox Beats the Street  Toys 'R' Us to Cut 1,900 Jobs  Gateway Slashes Prices  Expedia Blows Away Forecasts  New-Home Sales Rebound  GE's Immelt: Economic Recovery Likely in 2003  Micron, Hynix Talks Stall Over Price  Jenny Craig Agrees to Be Acquired for $115 Million  Ken Lay's Wife: We're Broke  Complete News Coverage     Insurance Center  Shop for competitive insurance rates on life, home, auto, disability and more.  Get multiple quotes and buy from the company of your choice -- on your own terms. Insurance Quotes   SmartMoney MagazineStart-Off The New Year With A Great Little Investment That Could Pay Off Big!  For a limited time you can subscribe to SmartMoney Magazine at a new lower price and receive SmartMoney's Preferred Subscriber Advantages. Don't miss this opportunity to make a small investment in the magazine whose top stock picks in the previous decade exceeded the S&P by remarkable margins.* And this special offer entitles you to higher new savings: $48 or 69% off the newsstand rate! Plus, all the advantages of being a Preferred Subscriber. But it won't last long, click now for details . * As of Aug 2001.             [IMAGE]  If you have any questions or problems, please email us at: helplist@smartmoneylist.com               You have received this email because you have opted-in to receive information from SmartMoney.com. To unsubscribe from this mailing please follow this link . To change your preferences, visit our site at http://www.smartmoney.com/mailinglist .  If you're having difficulties viewing this newsletter, you should change your preferences to "Text" at the above URL.                  	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	   [IMAGE] Select the Best  SmartMoney Select's Stock Screener  lets you pick winners using the proven formulas of our weekly stock screen, or fashion your own strategy with the help of the powerful stock screener. Subscribe today for a free two-week trial!     [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] Here Comes Your New Health Plan  With medical costs skyrocketing, you're likely to be offered a newfangled form of health insurance. But is it a raw deal?  Full Article .    [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	  Smartmoney.com Daily Views SmartMoney.com ?2002 SmartMoney. SmartMoney is a joint publishing venture of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and Hearst Communications, Inc.  	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]


Lexi:  In our meeting last week, I thought that we handled both Greg and
Ryan, and were comfortable with Round 1 interviews only (2 interviewers) with
this disposition:  Greg as a keeper (wasn't he the one who worked in the
career center?) and no to Ryan.

I will be glad to do a phone interview this week with

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Lexi Elliott @ ENRON                           11/06/2000 09:03 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg
Nikkel/HOU/EES@EES, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tana Cashion/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Justin O'Malley/HOU/EES@EES, Patrick Maloy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: OU Interns

Dear Interviewers:

As a follow-up from campus interviews, the following candidates still need to
be screened:

Greg Carlson and Ryan Morrison -- Need round 2 interviews
Matthew Hutchison -- Needs round 1 and round 2 interviews

Please let me know if you are interested in interviewing these candidates via
telephone this week.

Thank you!

lexi
3-4585


Sorry about that--I had not saved the changes I made.  This should be
right.


Dear Real-Timers,

I just wanted to drop you guys a line to say thanks for keeping better notes
and more complete trade logs.  I can't tell you how much more efficiently I
get things done when I find the counterparty trader's name, time of a
conversation, and a confirm of MW and price values.

I really appreciate your efforts.

Sincerely,

Virginia


Wow.  I wonder how long it will take for me to get a good handle on this
stuff?

Thanks,

Kay

	From:  Christi L Nicolay @ ECT                           04/10/2001 03:33 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Reagan Rorschach/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: FW: 200 version

some comments

A.  1st sentence --Remove "a" before dual fuel.  Change delivers to deliver
"Costs"  (xi)  Add "SPP or" before "Serc-imposed
"Protocols"  I don't think there are SERC Protocols (this may be from ERCOT
agreement).
"Serc ISO"  There is not such thing yet.
"SPP"  Add "Reliability" after Electric

---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 04/10/2001
03:30 PM ---------------------------
From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/09/2001 02:31 PM
To: David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: 200 version

Here is the latest.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 2:03 PM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: 200 version

Let's see if I can attach it this time.


Errol,   This is what I spoke to you about on the phone...

In order to prepare for the new Broker-Client application that EOL will be
supporting, we need to clean up the EOL deals in tagg.  We have found alot of
deals in tagg that have EOL in the broker field, but no EOL deal number.
Most of these are due to second legs being added manually after the EOL
transaction, or the EOL deal number being deleted from the tagg leg.  We are
asking risk to go thru these deals and add the EOL deal number to the legs
that do not have the deal number listed.

For example, if the deal is two (+) legs and only one leg has the EOL number
on it and clearly the other legs are associated with the one EOL transaction,
manually enter the EOL deal number into the remaining legs.

Attached is the list of deals.  I spot checked several of these and pretty
much found the common trend of one leg has just EOL in the broker field and
the second leg has EOL in the broker field and an EOL deal number.  I have
seperated the list into different tabs by counterparty name.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Dawn
3-9353


Who, if anyone, would like to attend?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 11/27/2000
04:03 PM ---------------------------

"Delaney Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com> on 11/16/2000 05:27:46 PM

Please respond to <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>

To:   "Aaron Thomas (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>, "'Allan Lippincott'"
<alippin@mail.arco.com>, "Ann Cohn (E-mail)" <cohnap@sce.com>, "'Ann
Watson'" <anw@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Anna Ferrera (E-mail)"
<Anna.Ferrera@SEN.CA.GOV>, "'Art Carter'" <debinorton@aol.com>,
"'assistant for John Fielder'" <moravekj@sce.com>, "Audra Hartmann
(E-mail)" <ath@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)"
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "'Becky Kilbourne'"
<bakilbourne@calpx.com>, "Bill Booth (E-mail)"
<wbooth@booth-law.com>, "'Bill Dombrowski'" <cra@calretailers.com>,
"Bill Keese (E-mail)" <wkeese@energy.state.ca.us>, "Bill Zobel
(E-mail)" <bzobel@mail.arco.com>, "'Bob Foster'" <fosterrg@sce.com>,
"'Bob Houston'" <houstgrp@pacbell.net>, "Carolyn McIntyre (E-mail)"
<cmcintyre@sempra.com>, "Carolyn Veal-Hunter (E-mail)"
<carolyn.veal-hunter@asm.ca.gov>, "Catherine Hackney (E-mail)"
<hacknece@sce.com>, "Charles Bacchi (E-mail)"
<charles.bacchi@asm.ca.gov>, "'Craig Brown'" <brownc@epenergy.com>,
"Dan Carroll (E-mail)" <dcarroll@dbsr.com>, "'Denice Cazalet'"
<dcazalet@apx.com>, "Dennis Price (E-mail)" <priced@epenergy.com>,
"'Denny Samuel'" <dsam@chevron.com>, "'Dominic DiMare'"
<dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, "Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)"
<drothrock@cmta.net>, "'Ed Yates'" <ed@clfp.com>, "Eloy Garcia
(E-mail)" <egarcia@ka-pow.com>, "Evelyn Elsesser (E-mail)"
<eke@aelaw.com>, "Gary Heath (E-mail)" <gheath@eob.ca.gov>, "'Gordon
McDonald'" <gordon.mcdonald@pacificorp.com>, "'Jack Flanigan'"
<jackflanigan@flaniganlaw.com>, "Jack Gualco (E-mail)"
<Jackson_Gualco@gualcogroup.com>, "'Jack Stewart'"
<jstewart@cmta.net>, "'James Boyd'" <jim@resources.ca.gov>, "Jan
Smutny-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Jerry Jordan'" <jordan@cmua.org>, "Jim Cassie
(E-mail)" <jcassie@sempra.com>, "Jim Groniger (E-mail)"
<gronijn@texaco.com>, "Joe Lyons (E-mail)" <joseph.lyons@asm.ca.gov>,
"'Joe Ronan'" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Bridges (E-mail)"
<bridgesj@epenergy.com>, "'John Fielder'" <fieldejr@sce.com>, "John
Fistolera (E-mail)" <johnf@ncpa.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<jgl@cpuc.ca.gov>, "John Rozsa (E-mail)" <John.Rozsa@sen.ca.gov>,
"John White (E-mail)" <vjw@cleanpower.org>, "'Joseph Alamo'"
<jalamo@enron.com>, "Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)" <jmball@ns.net>,
"'Julia Wright'" <jwright@smithandkempton.com>, "Karen Edson
(E-mail)" <kedson@ns.net>, "Karen Jarrell (E-mail)"
<kjarrell@smurfit.com>, "Karen Koyano (E-mail)" <kykoyano@calpx.com>,
"'Karen Lindh'" <karen@klindh.com>, "Karen Mills (E-mail)"
<kmills@cfbf.com>, "'Kari Harteloo'" <klc@aelaw.com>, "Kassandra
Gough (E-mail)" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'Kathy Brandenburg'"
<katherinebrandenburg@flaniganlaw.com>, "Kay Grosulak (E-mail)"
<kgrosulak@sppc.com>, "Keith McCrea (E-mail)" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
"Kevin Lynch (E-mail)" <Kevin.Lynch@pacifiCorp.com>, "Kevin Smith
(E-mail)" <kevins@ncpa.com>, "Kip Lipper (E-mail)"
<kip.lipper@sen.ca.gov>, "Lawrence Lingbloom (E-mail)"
<lawrence.lingbloom@sen.ca.gov>, "Lenny Goldberg (E-mail)"
<lga@mother.com>, "Louis Szablya (E-mail)" <szablyal@epenergy.com>,
"Marc Joseph (E-mail)" <mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>, "Marwan Masri
(E-mail)" <mmasri@energy.state.ca.us>, "Mary McDonald (E-mail)"
<memcdonald@calpx.com>, "Michael Alcantar (E-mail)" <mpa@aelaw.com>,
"Mike Florio (E-mail)" <mflorio@turn.org>, "'Mike Kahl'"
<mikahl@ka-pow.com>, "Mona Petrochko (E-mail)" <mpetroch@enron.com>,
"Pete Conaty (E-mail)" <pcaceo@pacbell.net>, "'Phil Nails'"
<phil.nails@asm.ca.gov>, "Phil Stohr (E-mail)" <pstohr@dbsr.com>,
"Ralph Cavanagh (E-mail)" <rcavanagh@nrdc.org>, "Randy Chinn
(E-mail)" <randy.chinn@sen.ca.gov>, "Ray Thompson (E-mail)"
<ray.thompson@sen.ca.gov>, "'Rick Counihan'"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Robert Berry (E-mail)"
<berry@apx.com>, "Robin Larson (E-mail)" <rlarson@caiso.com>, "Sheryl
Carter (E-mail)" <scarter@nrdc.org>, "Steve Pike (E-mail)"
<pikes@epenergy.com>, "Steve Ponder (E-mail)" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>,
"Stu Wilson (E-mail)" <swilson@cmua.org>, "'Sue Mara'"
<smara@enron.com>, "Susan Reeder (E-mail)" <sreeder@sppc.com>, "Terry
Winter (E-mail)" <twinter@caiso.com>, "Thomas Dinkel (E-mail)"
<tdinkel@retx.com>, "Tim Schmelzer (E-mail)"
<Tschmelz@energy.state.ca.us>, "'Tommy Ross'" <rosst@sce.com>, "'Tony
Braun'" <braun@cmua.org>, "Victoria Schaefer (E-mail)"
<schaefvl@sce.com>
cc:

Subject:  MEETING NOTICE

The next meeting of the California Energy Solutions Group (formerly the AB
1890 Implementation Group) will be:

Friday, December 1, 2000
9:00 to 12:30
California Chamber of Commerce
1215 K Street, 14th Floor

We will be sending out an agenda forthwith. Please contact me if you have
any questions or would like to add an item to the agenda.

Thanks to all of you who attended this year's retreat. It was a great
success because of your participation.

Thanks again,
Delaney