I can't get into this....any ideas?
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 10/14/2000 05:12
PM ---------------------------

Christa Winfrey
10/06/2000 06:00 PM
To: Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darin Talley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alisa
Green/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Faith Killen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Stadler/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J
Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Kevin M
Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Benien/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Frank/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Anderson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi
Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Trey Hardy/HOU/ECT@ect, Tammy R Shepperd/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Valdez/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra Schultz/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Falcone/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, Frank
Prejean/HOU/ECT@ECT, James New/LON/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Beasley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Sweeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Minal Dalia/HOU/EES@EES, Nelson Bibby/LON/ECT@ECT, Scott
Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Thomas Myers/HOU/ECT@ECT,
George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Groves/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Massey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mason Hamlin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton@Enron, Jeffrey K Skilling@Enron, LaCrecia Davenport/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Rebecca Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W
White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sunil
Dalal/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gabriel
Monroy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie A
Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill Louie/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Jere C
Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Pierce/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Thompson/LON/ECT@ECT,
Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Michael S
Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Miller/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mark Tawney/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paula McAlister/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lydecker/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rodney
Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Andrea V Reed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Komarek/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cris Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Leboe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gail Tholen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whiting/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Herman
Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lon Draper/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mary
Lynne Ruffer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stanley Farmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephen
Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jonathan McKay/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew, Andrew R Conner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Adams/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Beardmore/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Richard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Timothy M Norton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny
Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Valarie Sabo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Monica Lande/PDX/ECT@ECT, Vince
J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vern Vallejo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Chen/NA/Enron@Enron, Annemieke
Slikker/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Executive Reports Viewer: NEW LOCATION

As of midnight, Saturday, October 7th, the Executive Reports Viewer will no
longer be accessible at its current location, due to IT modifications.  The
system has been redesigned to allow access via Internet Explorer (you cannot
use Netscape).  The new location is http://ersys.corp.enron.com.
This change will ONLY affect the viewing of the reports; it will NOT impact
the publishing of the reports.

A shortcut icon can be created by dragging the Internet Explorer Logo
(located in the address field next to the URL) to the desktop.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Kristin Walsh at
3-9510 or myself at 3-9307.

Thank you for your understanding,
Christa Winfrey


I don't understand the last sentence.

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/25/2001 09:31 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Open items for MDEA

The value in the table is the beginning balance for each month.  So if they
cancel in the middle of the month, they should pay the balance at the
beginning of that month and no prorated minimum monthly fee.  If you prorate
it on both ends, you end up getting the total balance shown at the beginning
of the month.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 9:08 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Cc: Coulter, Kayne; May, Tom; Miller, Jeffrey; Fairley, David
Subject: RE: Open items for MDEA

Schedule reflects amount due for cancellation on or before the stated dates?

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 01:19 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kayne Coulter/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom May/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey
Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: Open items for MDEA

Kay, see attached.  The monthly fee should be $13,003.  I took the $300k we
have all been discussing and backed out the $12,500 they paid under the ILA
terms.

 << File: Cancellation Fee Schedule.doc >>

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Rorschach, Reagan; Kroll, Heather; Fairley, David; May, Tom
Subject: Re: Open items for MDEA

More:

We need internal agreement on the cancellation fee schedule, to be included
as an exhibit.

What is the status of the Yazoo City master gas agreement?  Do we still want
a master gas agreement for Clarksdale, also?  Do we want it now?

Thanks,

Kay

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Kay Mann
05/23/2001 05:05 PM
To: Reagan Rorschach/Enron@EnronXGate, Heather Kroll/Enron@EnronXGate, David
Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom May/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: Open items for MDEA

Here are issues which I'm unclear about, all of which impact the drafting of
the agreement:

How are we setting the heat rate?  Do we have the GADS (?)?  Is it a daily
average, weekly average?  Flat rate? Adjusted? If so, how often?

Are we comfortable that there are no permit restrictions?

We have determined that we won't deal with fuel oil, right?

We aren't making money on gas, right?

Do we have a defn of costs that we like yet, and if so, how does it fit in to
the picture?

Is there an up-to-date set of exhibits?

It would help if theh commercial part of the team could send me the
following, in words and/or formulae:

The defn and method of establishing the bogey (target production cost)
formula can be an exhibit, which would be great for the commercial team to
work on.   Are we determined how we should deal with imbalances (part of cost
of power)?  How are we setting the bogey?  Formula?  Subject to audit? Two
bogeys or one (gas and oil)?

What is defn of profit?  I think I have the general idea, but a sentence or
two would be helpful as a reality check.  What costs are included on the buy
and sell side?

Re stack model: a sentence or two describing what it is and how it is used.

Updated exhibit on facilities, contracted resources, operating limits.

What information does MDEA need for us to provide in order to split
costs/profits?  Are we clear that Cities buy gas, MDEA buys/sells power?

It would be great if I could get one set of answers to these
questions/issues, which has commercial buy in all around.

Thanks,

Kay


I believe that it was Ricky Greene.  I also believe that the laundry
detergent was also melted onto his clothes, and yes it was the first time
that he did laundry.


I have already given Andy my input. If you have comments , please call Andy
before 1:00pm today.


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Continuation     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/cl77.pdf

Natural Gas Continuation
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ng77.pdf

Brent Continuation     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/qo77.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Dear Drs. Roberts and Benjamin,

Vince Kaminski and I enjoyed and appreciated the opportunity to speak with
you this morning. Enron is very happy to agree to participate in Stanford's
GLOBE project (being conducted in partnership with McKinsey & Company).

Attached please find my business card with all of my contact information.

 I look forward to hearing from Dr. Benjamin in the near future to begin
Enron's involvement.

Thank you!

--Christie.


The Networking team will be testing the connection again this evening
starting at 7:30 PM.    If you have any questions or concerns please feel
free to contact me or Chip Cox.

Thank you for your patience.

Diana


This may prove helpful.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
11/13/98 12:07 PM ---------------------------
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cd$ CME letter

Mark

Gary has asked me to send you a short description of why we have executed all
those CD contracts at the Chicago Merc
Find enclosed a short explanation note.  If you have any questions, feel free
to give  me a call at 36750

Harry


The California Litigation weekly conference call scheduled for 2:00 p.m. today has been cancelled.

Also, please note there will not be a call on Thursday, June 15.

Thank you.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


Sorry those didn't get to you yesterday.  It was 7:00 pm before I had time to get that together for you, only to discover that all that I had were hard copies.  Our ENW CAO had summarized the data for us into the single page format, and he had never e-mailed me the file.  He was gone for the day, and I tried his cell phone, but didn't get an anwer.

Let me know how the meeting with Beth and Evan went today.  Lavorato and I have been working on something regarding gas logistics, and a follow up meeting was called on that this morning at 10:30.  The outcome of the meeting required a visit with David Oxley, so I could tell that making a meeting with you at 11:00 probably wasn't going to happen.

How are your 5:00 pm meetings?

I will catch up tomorrow.  --Sally

Hope that you made it to the soccer play-off game tonight!!


Accounting and Finance tell me that wiring GE directly from escrow is ok.

Kay

Stephen Thome@ECT
04/17/2001 03:16 PM
To: Paul Garcia/Enron@EnronXGate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Jake Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: RE: Escrow account

1.  Investment of funds should be OK with Enron.  We are not receiving the
pre-closing proceeds from escrow.

2.  Paul, can you confirm that wiring instructions in the agreement are
suitable.

3.  What fees are reasonable?

---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Thome/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 01:09
PM ---------------------------

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 04/17/2001 12:26:50 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: Stephen.Thome@enron.com
Subject: RE: Escrow account

Kay:

The escrow agreement that I have already prepared and circulated for this
transaction is the same form that we used in the Intergen transaction, which
is based on the form provided by Enron treasury for that transaction and
which is also Citibank's standard escrow form.

I need Enron to confirm several items in the escrow agreement:

 In Part I, Section 2, the escrow agent is directed (in the absence
of written instructions) to invest 50% of the funds in the Dreyfus Money
Market Fund titled Cash Management Investors Class (670) and 50% of the
funds in Treasury Cash Management Investor Class (673).  Please confirm that
these investment instructions are acceptable to Enron.

 Part I, Section 4 of the escrow agreement contains wiring
instructions for Enron.  Please confirm that these instructions indicate the
proper account for wire transfers by the escrow agent to Enron.

The fee schedule proposed by Citibank calls for payment by Enron of a $2,500
acceptance fee, an $8,000 flat annual administration fee, and legal fees of
Citibank at cost.  In the Intergen transaction, Citibank agreed to waive
legal fees associated with setup, although I have not approached Citibank
about a similar waiver for this transaction.  I need Enron to confirm that
these fees are acceptable.  If not, please advise whether I should approach
Citibank directly on a fee revision or whether Enron commercial people wish
to handle this.  Since ENA is responsible for all acceptance, setup and
administration fees associated with the escrow account (per the letter
agreement), I suppose it is acceptable for only ENA and Citibank to sign the
fee agreement.

Finally, please advise of the appropriate persons' names, titles and phone
numbers to insert into the Enron incumbency certificate.

Thanks.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King?& Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:01 PM
To: ccampbell@kslaw.com
Cc: Stephen.Thome@enron.com
Subject: Escrow account

Hi Carolyn,

What does Enron need to do to get the escrow account set up?  Is there
something Steve needs to do?

Thanks,

Kay

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


I just finally heard back from the traders on this deal. Apparently, Idaho's
schedule was cut by the ISO on Sunday, and therefore, we had to cut our sale
to them. The deal was originally 25 mw on peak, but was cut about 10 mw each
hour. That's why each hour now shows 15 mw and some scraps. The remainder of
the schedule we sold in the hour ahead market. This is a typical maneuver
when the ISO cuts schedules, but I guess you guys haven't had to confirm
daily deals in this situation before. Let me know if this is going to be a
problem, and we'll figure something out.

Thanks,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   04/02/2001 12:00 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 565759.01

Kate, please check, deal 565759.01, I verballed the trade with APB on Friday
3/30/01
Enron Sells Idaho
4/2-4/2
220.00    total mw s400
sp 15

Looks like it has been changed, each hour a different mw.
Please let me know the details.
Thanks
Stephanie


In celebration of EnronOnline's one millionth transaction this week, we would like to invite you to a celebration party on 	Thursday, June 7th from 5- 8 p.m. at The Grasshopper (506 Main Street @ Prairie in downtown).  Please RSVP as soon as 	possible by clicking on the link below.

	http://207.21.193.94/invitation/

	I hope to see you there.

	Andy Zipper


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001
04:23 PM ---------------------------
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randy Bhatia/HOU/EES@EES, Micah
Hatten/HOU/EES@EES, David Marye/Enron@EnronXGate, David Fontana/HOU/EES@EES,
Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Randy Johnson Hits Dove

---------------------- Forwarded by Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES on 03/28/2001
04:13 PM ---------------------------

"Centola, Larry" <lcentola@joneswalker.com> on 03/28/2001 03:14:43 PM
To: "'timothy.blanchard@enron.com'" <timothy.blanchard@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Randy Johnson Hits Dove

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kerth, David
Sent:  Wednesday, March 28, 2001 3:10 PM
To: Centola,  Larry
Subject: FW: Randy Johnson Hits Dove

?
Big Unit's fastball kills  dove
During the seventh inning of the Diamondbacks'  split-squad 10-6 victory
against the Giants on Saturday, Randy Johnson hit  and killed a dove flying
in front of home plate with a fastball. Johnson's  pitch to the Giants'
Calvin Murray was about three-fourths of the way to home  plate when it
struck the bird. Giants second baseman Jeff Kent picked  up the dead bird
with his bare hands and jokingly pointed toward Johnson  before taking it to
the dugout. Johnson was not amused by the incident. "I  didn't think it was
all that funny," he said. On Aug. 4, 1983, Yankees  outfielder Dave Winfield
killed a seagull in Toronto with a warmup throw. The  Ontario police charged
him with animal cruelty, although the charge was later  dropped.
Click here to link  directly to the story on ESPN's website and see the
video?
or
Download the video attached to this  email
 - BigUnitHitsDove.avi


Please see the attached document below, per format of information to be
presented
 at the Risk Management Off-site.

If you have any questions, please give me a call, x36143.

This off-site will take place as follows:

     Friday, February 16, 2001
        Kingwood Country Club
     1700 Kingwood Lake Trail
          Phone - 281-358-2171
      in the Pine Room
            Start Time 8:30AM

See Below Map

Driving Directions

Take US-59 N.
Take the exit towards KINGWOOD DR.
Turn RIGHT onto KINGWOOD DR.
Turn RIGHT onto LAKE KINGWOOD TRL.


per Melissa Dozier


Alan and Mary  --

Below are my comments and attached documents for the Conference on Market
Monitoring in California at the FERC.  I will call later to discuss further.
I suggest filing comments and would propose something along the lines of
PJM's market monitoring program for Enron's Proposal.  Please forward to
anyone else you think appropriate.

Comments and documents --

Attached are the four proposals discussed at the conference.  Comments are
due February 6.  Staff intends to issue its report/recommendations to the
Commission March 1.  We can comment on the Staff recommendations in March and
Commission action is anticipated around May 1.

Conference  --

Scott Miller chaired this informal Staff conference.   The morning was spent
discussing principles and the afternoon on specific proposals.  This included
the explanations of the attached plans, as well as a discussion of the PJM
Market Monitoring Program.

The conference can be summarized as follows --

 screens can be developed to determine if market power exists and is being
exercised.

 an appropriate role of the market monitor is to suggest structural reforms.

 Independence is necessary, but undefined.

 due process is necessary for any person under scrutiny.

 the debate on mitigation continues -- if mitigation, by whom and when are
the hot topics.

 one key is to get the market structure right -- mitigation becomes
unnecessary.

 California is different -- too much dependence on spot market/limited long
term contracts; and insufficient demand response.

The good news is that --

 Staff does not consider the ISO proposal as a starting point, but as a
vehicle to generate discussions
 (Staff succeeded  -- Duke and Dynegy went to great lengths to critize it).

 Staff has an open mind on the appropriate approach to market monitoring and
are soliciting written proposals  and comparisons to existing programs.

 Staff is not trying to fix the structure of the California market here --
ISO should do so under the December 15  order.

 Regional scope and access to information are legitimate questions for
comment.


george,

here is the presentation. I wasn't able to add a table showing the
distribution of bids by fuel type for April 2000 since the database is not
updated. Also, in the map I didn't make those minor changes. Because when I
try to erase those names, the map looks ugly. when i get back from california
let's get together and discuss the feedbacks from traders.

sevil,


1) if he's got 30 minutes, then he should join for 30 minutes.
2) quite urgent, since the analysis needs to be done pronto.
3) if he can't join, that's ok.  we can fill him after the meeting.

	Joseph Alamo
	05/10/2001 03:11 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Conference Call Availability - Addendum

Jeff - I guess Steffes' schedule is pretty tight tomorrow -- Linda wants to
know
1) is 30 minutes going to be enough time for this call?? and
2) how "Urgent" is it that it take place??

Please RSVP,
Thanks,
Joseph

---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 05/10/2001 01:09
PM ---------------------------

	Joseph Alamo
	05/10/2001 12:15 PM

To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
cc:

Subject: Conference Call Availability?

Linda called for Steffes re: your inquiry about a conference call on
Core/non-core -- he *might* be available
@ 8 AM PDT/10 Central......tentatively -- would that work for you??

Let me know ASAP, so I can call her back....

Thanks,
Joseph


Wanda -

FYI, Joe Hirl, the trader in charge of setting up the Tokyo trading office,
will be in Houston next week, and it would probably be a good idea if he
could interview Mark Frank, or whatever candidate we recommend for the
Controller position.   Our Controller for the Sydney office will be up the
following week and he should meet with her as well, as that will enable him
to get first hand knowledge of the remote trading office establishment issues
we've addressed in Australia.

Sally - did you decide on the one candidate you thought of when we met last?
We might want to arrange a meeting with him and Joe also.

Thanks,

Cassandra.


CALENDAR ENTRY:	REMINDER

Description:
	Marilyn's Start Date

Date:		2/15/2001
Time:		8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Summary of Davis/Alpert bill AB 260

Retro-active to June 1, 2000 through December 31, 2002, 6.5 cent/kWh cap on
the energy component for residential and small commercial customers (under
100 kW).  The Commission has the ability to extend through 2003.  The
Commission also has the ability to adjust the cap.

Commission can use revenues from utility-owned assets, refunds from FERC to
offset the undercollections.  (In addition, a companion bill was passed that
provides $150 million of general fund money to offset undercollections.)

Large commercial/industrial/agricultural customers have an opportunity to
"opt-in" to the 6.5 cent/kWh cap with an annual true-up.

SDG&E will under a prudence review by the CPUC, which may be another source
of funds to offset the undercollection.

Specific classes subject to cap:

  Schedule A, all acute care hospitals, all public and private k-12 schools,
all accounts on AL-TOU under 100 kW.

Attached a link to the bill
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0251-0300/ab_265_bill_20000830_enrol
led.pdf

Summary of the rate payer relief bill AB 1156 which would
Transfer of $150,000,000 from the general fund  to a subaccount within the
Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties.
Appropriate those funds from the subaccount, to the commission, to reduce the
adverse impact of high-cost wholesale energy purchases on certain ratepayers
if a specified rate ceiling is in effect, and if the commission determines
that a specified revenue shortfall would result in a ratepayer surcharge
greater than 10%, and the electricity rates were directly linked to Power
Exchange costs.
Declare that, on January 1, 2004, any remaining balance in the account would
revert to the General Fund.
Become operative only if AB 265 is enacted, as specified.
 Take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Attached a link to the bill
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1156_bill_20000830_enro
lled.pdf

AB 970 Siting Bill.

AB 970 passed last night. The final version has not been published yet. The
final version should only have an additional amendment relating to a Calpine
facility in San Jose for which expeditious treatment has not been granted. We
will produce a summary once the enrolled version is available, which should
be today or Tuesday at the latest. Bellow is the previous amended version of
the Sitting Bill.

Attached a link to bill as amended on 8/7/00

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0951-1000/ab_970_bill_20000807_amend
ed_sen.pdf.pdf


what is your address?  I will send what I have collected!

Eric

DASPARADO@aol.com on 02/01/2000 02:24:44 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FFL

Jason was telling me you had a check for me?  Was wondering when your giving
the payouts, need money man, rents coming up fast;)

Scott


Please see the attached.  If you have any questions please call.

ds


The record on Friday showed that 127 employees from Energy Operations had
pledged dollars to the United Way campaign.  Large number, but still
percentage-wise smaller than we would like.  I sent the message below to all
Energy Operations employees on Friday afternoon.  We'll see in a few days if
this helped on contributions.

Text of e:mail message to Energy Operations employees:

Two weeks ago I toured the Depelchin Center, one of the organizations that
receives much of its funding from the United Way.  I was surprised to find
out about the many programs that the center offers to neglected and abused
Houston children and  the caring adults who will open their homes as foster
parents.  I had already completed my electronic pledge card before going to
the center.  Learning about the important programs offered through Depelchin
and meeting four year-old Jessica and ten year-old Steven who were
temporarily housed there before going to foster homes made me very glad to
have made that pledge.

Enron has a terrific matching program that allows all employees to receive
matching funds for dollars that you may choose to give to non-profit
organizations.  Hopefully, many of you take advantage of this to stretch your
charitable giving during the year.  The United Way campaign is the one time
each year that Enron invites employees to partner with the company to make a
difference in the lives of so many in Houston.  Each dollar pledged by an
employee is matched by Enron.

If you have not yet completed your electronic pledge, please consider doing
so as soon as possible.  Our United Way campaign draws to its conclusion next
Wednesday, August 23.  I hope that each one of you will consider making a
pledge.  There is no gift that is too small, because cumulatively all Enron
employees can make a significant positive impact for Houston.  Log on to
http://unitedway.enron.com to complete your pledge card.

Thanks to the many of you who have already completed your electronic
pledge.


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 02/10/2000 03:42 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Yvette G Connevey @ ENRON                           02/10/2000 09:59 AM

To: Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy
Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Shanna Husser/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brenda F
Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Happy Hour to Welcome Jody Crook

You are invited to Happy Hour this evening to help Steve Venturatos welcome
Jody Crook, a new Analyst, to the Regulatory Compliance group.  We will be
meeting at the State Bar, 909 Texas, around 5:30.   Feel free to extend the
invitation!!

See ya there!

Yvette
x3.5953


I have never received any expense in my bank account, probably due to the difference in the names on the systems.  This is a huge issue and I need to know how much money is missing immediately and how this gets resolved.  I would think that we issued them in 'Kitchen' and therefore they were bounced by my account which is in 'Nettelton'.  I may be wrong if this is a common problem.

I may never have been paid any.  Please check all expenses going back all year.

This is a huge number which state they have been paid and have not hit my bank account.

Of the expenses showing up not cleared on my bank account I have received none of the payments which I think adds up as follows:

11/13/01	4,069:72
11/10/01	21,010:15
11/10/01	3,319:40

Plus I have a cheque for a prior expense which bounced which is for about $4000.

In pre- petition expenses this is clearly more than $5000.

In post petition - I also have expenses pending which will bounce if the name on the payee does not correspond to the account holder name.

Tammie - please work on this as our highest priority tomorrow.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"Zerilli, Frank" <fzerilli@POWERMERCHANTS.COM>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Zerilli+2C+20Frank+22+20+3Cfzerilli+40POWERMERCHANTS+2ECOM+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, July 27, 2001 8:54 AM
To:	'sharonzerilli@yahoo.com'; 'jarnold@enron.com'; 'Lew_G._williams@aep.com'; Dennis, Robert
Cc:	'Robert and Jeannine Votruba'; 'Stacey A. Hoey'; 'czerilli@lotus.com'
Subject:	fox-sports-nba-knicks[1].mov

 fox-sports-nba-knicks[1].mov

 - fox-sports-nba-knicks[1].mov


Stephanie:
I am helping Jane McBride in our Japan office with the ISDA Masters for
Japanese banks.  Can you help me get these drafted in the next few days?  I
will send you in a separate e-mail the forms of ISDA and CSA Schedules that
we use when drafting these Masters for Japanese entities.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 02/07/2001 08:29 AM -----

	Jane McBride@ENRON
	02/07/2001 03:44 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Worksheets

I wonder if I could get you to do ToaRe first.
NB - Bank of T-M done.

	John Suttle@ECT
	09/20/2000 01:21 PM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jonathan Whitehead/AP/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Worksheets

John,

Attached are the worksheets for Yasuda, Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Fuki Bank, and Toa
Reinsurance.  Sorry for the delay in getting these over to you.  Please call
if you have any questions.

Thanks,

John


Mary:  Thanks for the email.  No, I cannot use Ofelia on June 18 and I do not
want a substitute while she is gone.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Mary Ogden
	06/01/2001 04:27 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Ofelia Q

Dear Sara:  Ofelia says that if you like, she can work for you on Monday,
June 18 since she won't be in town that Thursday, when she's supposed to work
for you.  Please advise if you'd like her to come on the 18th.

Please also advise if you'd like a sub while she's gone to Colombia.

Thanks,
Mary
x37796


Week of November 1 is good for me!  Bruce, how could
we possibly meet w/out ya?
--- "Bowden, Bruce" <Bruce.Bowden@Williams.com> wrote:
>
> The original plan was to try and meet this week but
> the response has been
> light.  From the few that did respond (which I thank
> for the feedback) the
> consensus was to try and meet on Thursday but no
> location was picked.  I
> will unfortunately be out of town this Thursday and
> Friday on business.  If
> you guys still want to get together use the Reply to
> All and set up a time
> and place.  It has been a long time since most of us
> have tossed back a few
> brewskies together so don't let my absents stop you
> (as if it really would).
> I think my ego can take it, may be not my id but my
> ego can.
>
> Bruce
>
> P.S.  I had asked Rex to send out a notice but I did
> not receive a copy so I
> don't know if he had done so.  If you did Rex
> thanks, if you didn't....we
> need to talk about your memory loss.
>
>
> Bruce Bowden
> Williams Energy Marketing & Trading
> 713-215-3521 Williams Tower
> 713-569-6829 cellular
>
>

=====
scapes73@yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


Clint:

ENA is in complete agreement with DB on its ISDA.  Do you still want an ISDA
for ENE?

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Hey, you know my email doesn't update automatically, I actually have to
refresh it manually.  It sucks....

So, yes changes were good....although......I don't exactly know which changes
you were referring to, but I'll pick which ones I would have liked you to be
thinking of.  Anyway, I think I'm heading out to happy hour soon with jeff,
so you'll have to call if you want to communicate.

Later.

Mat


-----

	Calif GOP Lawmakers Ask PUC President To Resign

	Updated: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 02:14 PM?ET

	?
	?

	LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--California Assembly Republicans have called for the
resignation of Loretta Lynch, president of the state's Public Utilities
Commission, saying they have no confidence that the state's top regulator
will "play a constructive role in solving the state's energy crisis."
	Assembly Republican Minority Leader Bill Campbell, R-Villa Park, sent a
letter Tuesday to Gov. Gray Davis on behalf of the Assembly's Republican
Caucus asking Davis to call for Lynch's resignation.

	?
	"With efforts to solve California's energy crisis floundering in the midst of
unpaid bills, stalled negotiations and rolling blackouts, it has come time to
ask for the resignation of your appointed president of the California Public
Utilities Commission, Loretta Lynch," the letter said.
	Both Lynch and a spokesman for Davis were unavailable for comment.
	Lynch, a former attorney, was appointed president of the PUC by Davis in
March 2000. She is the state's top regulator, in charge of regulating
utilities, telecommunications, commercial transportation and water companies.
Before her appointment to the PUC, Lynch was head of Davis's office of
Planning and Research.
	The letter says the PUC had a number of opportunities last summer to keep the
electricity crisis from spiraling out of control by allowing Edison
International (EIX, news, msgs) unit Southern California Edison, PG&E Corp.
(PCG, news, msgs) unit Pacific Gas & Electric and Sempra Energy (SRE, news,
msgs) unit San Diego Gas & Electric to sign long-term power supply contracts
for about $50 a megawatt-hour, nearly $30 lower than the new long-term
contracts Davis said the state entered into recently with generators.
	Lynch's failure to "ensure that the commission's Aug. 3, 2000, emergency
order on long-term contracts was quickly implemented has placed the state
budget at risk for costs now at least 40% higher," the letter said. "This
hesitancy in a crisis will cost California's economy tens of billions of
dollars during the next 20 years."
	The state has spent more than $3 billion since January buying power in the
spot market. Davis has asked lawmakers for another $500 million from the
general fund to continue buying power. If the $500 million is granted, the
state's commitment to power purchases will surpass $4 billion.
	State Sen. Steve Peace, D-El Cajon, however, said last week that the Senate
Budget Committee will deny further requests for funding unless the PUC carves
out a revenue stream for the state's Department of Water Resources, the
agency that is now buying the bulk of the state's power on behalf of the
cash-strapped utilities.
	The PUC was expected to release guidelines last week on rates the DWR can
receive from utilities to pay back the general fund and to issue revenue
bonds to pay for long-term contracts. But the guidelines haven't yet been
released.
	Last year, the PUC said the utilities could enter into limited long-term
supply contracts to hedge their positions against price spikes. But the
commission also said it feared if the utilities signed long-term deals with
generators, liquidity in the wholesale market would be reduced.
	The Republican lawmakers said the commission is responsible for nearly
forcing the utilities into bankruptcy.
	"We have no confidence that Loretta Lynch will play a constructive role in
solving the energy crisis in the weeks and months ahead," the letter said.
"With Wall Street nervous about repayment of the $10 billion in revenue bonds
needed to cover the state's energy purchases, the CPUC has been unable to
perform an adequate assessment of the investor-owned utilities' financial
situation."
	-By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires;


Revisions to Devon #'s.

Beverly

---------------------- Forwarded by Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 09:57
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Victor Haley" <Victor.Haley@dvn.com>
11/29/2000 10:54 AM

To: <beverly.beaty@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Second revision to my spreadsheet- changes to previous one are noted
as REV 2

Second revision to my spreadsheet-   changes to previous one are noted as REV
2

 - EnronAvails1200pools.xls


What ended up happening with this capacity.  Did we show a bid of any kind.  Even if we have to warehouse this we should be able to.

BT


Is the difference between the first two cases and the second two cases the
higher 775 lb suction pressure that we hope we could get from pigging the
line?  If so, does this email say anything about whether we could get
10,000mmbtu/d to the Cal. border assuming the pigging successfully gets us to
775 lbs?  Lets talk to McShane tomorrow.  Thanks.. DF

e

Keith Petersen
12/19/2000 04:14 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Gallup Horsepower

Drew, the information below is the same as Terry Galassinni gave me.  It
looks though as the HP is still short, but I maybe reading it wrong.

Keith

---------------------- Forwarded by Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron on 12/19/2000
04:10 PM ---------------------------

Bob McChane
12/19/2000 03:44 PM
To: Terry Galassini/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron, JERRY MARTIN/ENRON@enronxgate, Arnold L
Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Norm
Spalding/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Earl Chanley/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Gallup Horsepower

The following is information requested by Terry Galassini:

Operating Points 1A and 1B have a 750 Psig line inlet pressure and differ
only in gas suction temperature, 75 Degrees F for 1A and 80 Degrees F for
1B.  Both conditions can operate with the current wheel at Gallup; however,
Rolls would have to agree to a faster spin of the current compressor wheel as
explained in the cases.  Without approval from Rolls, a new aero, $125,000,
would be required.The motor horsepower is the crital component.  Mr
Eisenstein will have to comment on motor capability.

Operating Point #1A

750 Psig - Line Suction Pressure
75 Degrees F - Gas Suction Temperature
970 Psig - Line Discharge Pressure
850 MMcfd - Compressed Volume

Head = 12,442 Feet
Acfm = 10,827 Actual Ft3/Min?Gas Horsepower Required = 12,300 @ 80% (Required Power to Motor = 13,369 ?Hp/9,970 KW *)?Gas Horsepower Required = 12,456 @ 79% (Required Power to Motor = 13,539 ?Hp/10,100 KW *)?* Represents an 8% total motor, gearbox and compressor bearing losses.??Two options exist for this case.??The first is to increase the compressor wheel speed from its current maximum ?continuous 9,450 Rpm speed to 9,922 Rpm (+5%).  The wheel was shop tested to ?10,868 Rpm (+15%).  Rolls would have to advise the warranty and saftey ?considerations.  If agreed to by Rolls, the current wheel would need to ?operate at the following conditions to meet the above head and Acfm:??Compressor Speed = 9,625 Rpm (Approximate)?Motor Speed = 1,528 Rpm (Can the above horsepowers into the motor be acheived ?at this speed, Arnold????) ?Inlet velocity to compressor = 102.11 Ft3/Sec
Maximum Design is 120 Ft/Sec
Gallup Test Had 4 Points at or Above 102 Ft/Sec w/No vibration or Noise
Problems.

The second is to purchase a new aero assembly, $125,000 and 20 - 24 weeks
lead time.  A new aero would probably spin a little slower than the 9,625 Rpm
suggested above.  This would put more emphasis on motor horsepower at a speed
less than 1,528 as calculated above.  Again, Mr. Eisenstein would have to
comment on motor capability.

Operating Point #1B

750 Psig - Line Suction Pressure
80 Degrees F - Gas Suction Temperature
970 Psig - Line Discharge Pressure
850 MMcfd - Compressed Volume

Head = 12,604 Feet
Acfm = 10,968 Actual Ft3/Min?Gas Horsepower Required = 12,460 @ 80% (Required Power to Motor = 13,544 ?Hp/10,099 KW *)?Gas Horsepower Required = 12,617 @ 79% (Required Power to Motor = 13,715 ?Hp/10,228 KW *)?* Represents an 8% total motor, gearbox and compressor bearing losses.??Two options exist for this case.??The first is to increase the compressor wheel speed from its current maximum ?continuous 9,450 Rpm speed to 9,922 Rpm (+5%).  The wheel was shop tested to ?10,868 Rpm (+15%).  Rolls would have to advise the warranty and saftey ?considerations.  If agreed to by Rolls, the current wheel would need to ?operate at the following conditions to meet the above head and Acfm:??Compressor Speed = 9,675 Rpm (Approximate)?Motor Speed = 1,536 Rpm (Can the above horsepowers into the motor be acheived ?at this speed, Arnold????) ?Inlet velocity to compressor = 103.45 Ft3/Sec
Maximum Design is 120 Ft/Sec
Gallup Test Had 4 Points at or Above 103 Ft/Sec w/No vibration or Noise
Problems.

The second is to purchase a new aero assembly, $125,000 and 20 - 24 weeks
lead time.  A new aero would probably spin a little slower than the 9,675 Rpm
suggested above.  This would put more emphasis on motor horsepower at a speed
less than 1,536 as calculated above.  Mr. Eisenstein would have to comment on
motor capability.

Operating Points 2A and 2B have a 775 Psig line inlet pressure and differ
only in gas suction temperature, 75 Degrees F for 2A and 80 Degrees F for
2B.  Both conditions can operate with the current wheel at Gallup at the
current speed limit.  Whether or not the current motor at the site is capable
of meeting the 2A and 2B conditions without modifications is left up to Mr.
Eisenstein.

Operating Point #2A

775 Psig - Line Suction Pressure
75 Degrees F - Gas Suction Temperature
970 Psig - Line Discharge Pressure
850 MMcfd - Compressed Volume

Head = 10,841 Feet
Acfm = 10,451 Actual Ft3/Min?Gas Horsepower Required = 10,718 @ 80% (Required Power to Motor = 11,650 ?Hp/8,688 KW *)??* Represents an 8% total motor, gearbox and compressor bearing losses.??Based on test results at Gallup, the compressor speed will be approximately ?8,900 Rpm, well within its current capability.  The current wheel would ?operate at the following conditions to meet the above head and Acfm:??Compressor Speed = 8,900 Rpm (Approximate)?Motor Speed = 1,413 Rpm (Can the above horsepowers into the motor be acheived ?at this speed, Arnold????) ?Inlet velocity to compressor = 98.57 Ft3/Sec
Maximum Design is 120 Ft/Sec
Gallup Test Had 4 Points at or Above 99 Ft/Sec w/No vibration or Noise
Problems.

Operating Point #2B

775 Psig - Line Suction Pressure
80 Degrees F - Gas Suction Temperature
970 Psig - Line Discharge Pressure
850 MMcfd - Compressed Volume

Head = 10,984 Feet
Acfm = 10,590 Actual Ft3/Min?Gas Horsepower Required = 10,858 @ 80% (Required Power to Motor = 11,803 ?Hp/8,802 KW *)??* Represents an 8% total motor, gearbox and compressor bearing losses.??Based on test results at Gallup, the compressor speed will be approximately ?8,960 Rpm, well within its current capability.  The current wheel would ?operate at the following conditions to meet the above head and Acfm:??Compressor Speed = 8,960 Rpm (Approximate)?Motor Speed = 1,422 Rpm (Can the above horsepowers into the motor be acheived ?at this speed, Arnold????) ?Inlet velocity to compressor = 99.88 Ft3/Sec
Maximum Design is 120 Ft/Sec
Gallup Test Had 4 Points at or Above 100 Ft/Sec w/No vibration or Noise
Problems.

Bob


It all depends on what the letter says---but I am sure it is fine. I am here
this am.

	Kristi Fredericks/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/25/2001 05:13 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Internal Legal Representation Letter

Richard-

We are currently nearing the end of our audit for EnSerCo, L.L.C. and
therefore we need to send out an internal legal representation letter.  I
know that you were the person who signed the letter last year and therefore I
was wondering if you could sign it for us this year as well.  If could let me
know, then I can bring this by to you Thursday morning for your signature.

Thanks,
Kristi Voinis
x53458


[IMAGE]  jason.wolfe@enron.com  [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  Just about everyone could use a cellphone today. Millions of people are already enjoying the safety, convenience, and independence of owning one.   Now it's never been easier to get your own cellphone...and for FREE.  WorldCom Wireless and AT?Wireless, two of the nation's premier wireless service carriers have the unique ability to handle your cellular service needs, from coast-to-coast. They feature quality cellphones from manufacturers like Nokia, Motorola, and Ericsson.   Even if you already own a cellphone, why not update to one that has the newest features and technology or provide a cellphone for another family member?   With WorldCom Wireless and AT?Wireless, the phones are FREE plus we have made the shopping experience simple and hassle-free!  To take advantage of this great offer, just click HERE ...  	[IMAGE]	     CLICK HERE NOW!        [IMAGE]       [IMAGE]       [IMAGE]              FREE CELL PHONE Here's your chance  to get a FREE cell phone from a  premier wireless service carrier! CLICK HERE NOW!

If you no longer wish to recieve future mailing as a National Brands Member, click here  to unsubscribe.

[IMAGE]


Pravas,

No problem. Please, coordinate with Shirley.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sud, Pravas
Sent:	Friday, January 18, 2002 10:47 AM
To:	Brelsford, Loretta
Cc:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	RE: Move to EGAS, EB 33

Thanks Loretta.

FYI- I was told that it was ok for me to stay here on the 19th. So unless anyone else has been assigned this work space I should be ok?
Please advise.

Regards,
Pravas
X52419

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brelsford, Loretta
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:47 AM
To:	Sud, Pravas
Subject:	Move to EGAS, EB 33

Pravas,

The move for this week-end has been submitted and cannot be changed.  I've talked to the head of the move group.  She is aware that you are in 1968 and will not be moving until later.  This is fine.  Next week we'll schedule your move - I'll talk to you then about what you'll be moving and where.

Thanks,
Loretta
x55541


Dear members and prospective members,
It gives the Indo-American Chamber great pleasure to announce that Dr. John Lienhard as our February speaker. Dr. Lienhard is a M D Anderson Professor of  Mechanical Engineering and History at the Unv. Of Houston where he has taught since 1980.
He is the author and voice of more than 1,400 episodes of The Engines of Our Ingenuity, a daily public radio series about machines and the people who created them. A popular speaker , Dr. Lienhard averages 50 speaking engagements in a year. You can view  Dr. Lienhard's profile and home page clicking on the links below.Dr. Lienhard Bio Dr. Lienhard's Radio program homepage
Event Topic: Innovation, A Dangerous Guest---- "Do you really want creative   people in your organization"
Venue: The Briar Club
       2603 Timmons Lane
       Houston TX- 77027
Directions: The Briar club is located in the River Oaks area. From 610 go East on Westheimer(away from the Galleria) after passing Weslayan look for Timmons on the right. Timmons lane is immediately after the Whattaburger. For the convenience of our guests we have arranged for complimentary valet parking.
Date: February 13th, 2002 (Wednesday)
Time: 6.30 - 9.00 p.m.
RSVP: By noon February the 4th
Program: 6.30- Mixer and registration
                7.00- Buffet Dinner
                8.00- Dr. Lienhard
                8.30- Q&A session
                9.00- Adjourn
Cost: Members- $30/-
         Non-members- $40/-
Complimentary Valet parking
RSVP's required to attend. Sorry no walk-ins.
Chitra Shanbhogue
Executive Director
IACCGH
713-624-7131
chitra@iaccgh.com
www.iaccgh.com


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	EB3268 -  Sam Leushen "Lady" (Interview)

Date:		4/23/2001
Time:		10:30 AM - 11:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:

Rick Suttle 5-4018


You have been specially selected to receive a   FREE   mini-vacation:

			 Choose from over 15 destinations!
	 Orlando, FL  Ft. Lauderdale, FL  Daytona Beach, FL  Myrtle Beach, SC  Ashville, NC	 Branson, MO  Wisconsin Dells, WI  New Orleans, LA  Las Vegas, NV  and many more!

			 Hurry!Sign up today

To be removed from further mailings click here
[IMAGE]


Hi,

Has Reggie made any progress on the short file cabinets?

Thanks,

Kay


Mark, please let me know if this format suffices -- if so I will update this
for you every Monday -- thanks, Bob


I believe that the trade should have been book at zero premium.  Please make the appropriate changes.

Regards,

Jon

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dalgleish, Randel
Sent:	Monday, June 11, 2001 10:35 AM
To:	Mckay, Jonathan
Cc:	Joslyn, Kate
Subject:	Pricing for sale of 51 GJ's

John, my understanding of our deal with you to sell 51 GJ's of gas to you each day until the end of June was at the AECO daily price with no discount. The Schedule A for Sitara 838545 shows a discount of $0.06835 per GJ. If this should be 0 can you let  me and Lisa McIsaac know so the contract can be changed, if not can you contact Kate or myself when you have a break in trading or after trading has closed for the day.

Thanks

Randel Dalgleish
(403) 663-2807
(403) 663-2899 Fax


In todays meeting the CPUC did NOT act on the Revised Proposed Decision issued last week to unbundle the SoCal system.  Once again the decision has been Held Over to the next meeting.  gh


When are you and Laura coming down for a Golf game.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hedstrom, Peggy
Sent:	Thursday, March 29, 2001 9:39 AM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	Re: FW: Extension of Petro-Canada Wholesale Gas Services Arrangement for 5 more years

Thanks for the recognition.  It's very much appreciated.  Hope all is well with you & the family.
Peg

From:	John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/28/2001 08:48 AM
To:	Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Frevert/ENRON@enronXgate, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:	FW: Extension of Petro-Canada Wholesale Gas Services Arrangement for 5 more years

After a great deal of work the Canadian team has renewed our outsourcing arrangement with PetroCanada for another 5 years.  This was a great accomplishment for Enron Canada.  The Logistics, Accounting and Commercial execution over the last 3 and 1/2 years played a key role in extending this deal.

John
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Milnthorp, Rob
Sent:	Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:21 AM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	RE: Extension of Petro-Canada Wholesale Gas Services Arrangement for 5 more years

John, as per our telecon, please see the attached for details. Let me know if you require something further.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT on 02/23/2001 05:11 PM ---------------------------
From:	Eric LeDain on 02/23/2001 09:11 AM
To:	Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Extension of Petro-Canada Wholesale Gas Services Arrangement for 5 more years

On Wednesday the President of Petro-Canada approved the extension of our Wholesale Gas Services Agreement after the first term expires November 1, 2002, for an incremental 5 years.  This has taken me a a while to get closed (and while doing so we have had to keep up a consistently high level of service), but keep in mind it's not easy to renew something half way through the first term.

This extension is very significant for the following reasons:
1. It creates a MTM income of $2.9 MM CDN, net of directly attributable costs to provide the back-office services;
2. It supports further deal flow and potential incentive arrangement income (along with all the production information etc.);
3. Of even greater importance it provides a very critical and frequently used marketing tool as we continue to build our gas and power businesses across Canada.  As you know, we have used the Petro-Canada arrangement as an example of the services we can provide, not only when marketing in Canada but also in the US and Europe.  Now we can tell potential customers that we not only have provided services to this customer for 3 years, but they've liked it so much they've already extended the agreement for five more years after the first term - the message has to be that we are providing a good quality of service.

Obviously this is a great credit to our Commercial staff and the Operations, Accounting and IT staff that work with Petro-Canada.   I will separately advise each of the individuals who works on this account about the renewal and congratulate them.  It takes alot of effort to "enchant" the customer day after day, year after year.  In fact it's incredibly difficult to be effectively on trial day in and day out as a service provider.

The numbers:
Under the extension, we have provided Petro-Canada with a rebate applied to the remaining term of the agreement from our original base fee.
Original base fee is $1.75 MM CDN per year, payable monthly.

Rebate offered:
Jan/01 - Nov/01				($458,300) CDN
Nov/01 - Nov/02			($517,000) CDN
Fee charged for extension term:
Nov/02 - Nov/03			$1,366,000 CDN
Nov/03 - Nov/04			$1,400,000 CDN
Nov/04 - Nov/05			$1,435,000 CDN
Nov/05 - Nov/06			$1,470,000 CDN
Nov/06 - Nov/07			$1,510,000 CDN

We have thoroughly defined our back-office costs required to provide these services at $428,700 CDN/yr (2000$), and have 3 years of operating history to support this as a projection (with escalation at 2% per year) for the second five year term.  These costs include back-office staff allocations (salaries and benefits), and rent/infrastructure allocation.  We have checked on the allocation of Houston costs, and on a per transaction basis these are insignificant compared to our base business transaction levels.  We do not include commercial staff costs in the above as they are covered by the incentive arrangement and ongoing transaction deal flow.
In discussions with Wes, this definition of the costs and certainty about the arrangement scope, will allow us to MTM this income.  The MTM income of $2.9 MM CDN includes the rebate offered for the last two years of the current term, and has been reduced by the above annual costs.

Notes:
1.  We have not defined the incentive fee for the second five year period yet as we are doing some work at the moment with PCOG on what our benchmark should be, given that much of the intermediate Producers in the group of 40 have disappeared.  We will revise the agreement to reflect the fact that there will be a further revision once the incentive fee is agreed to.
2. If Petro-Canada's sales volumes fall to 60% of last years levels, there will be a price reopener for the remaining term because we have defined the fee as an absolute cost rather than per unit rate.  We also have a reopener on price if the volumes grow to about 140% of today's levels.  Petro-Canada has a growth strategy for gas so this is not at all expected.  Volumes over the last 6 months have increased by about 7-8% year on year.
3. Peter and I should have the amended agreement out next week.


Mark,

Please send this to John.

Hollis

Mark Fisher
04/22/2002 07:39 AM
To: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: WR594 Gearbox data

Hollis,

Here is a copy of the data for request 594. There is virtually no formatting.
If this looks OK I'll send it on to John Admire.

Mark


Sorry, the attachment was left off the first  e-mail.
 - RP96-347 Req or Rehg.doc


Leslie and Elizabeth
FYI.
Carol
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2000 03:58 PM -----

	Bill Windle@ENRON
	06/02/2000 03:56 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ACE USA Policy Review

Carol,

I have spoken to ACE and reserved 3:30 CDT for a teleconference. Thanks for
the help.


May you all be blessed with wonderful things this Christmas Season.  But
above all else, remember Jesus is the reason for the season.  Daily-Blessings
wishes you all the best today and everyday.  God Bless YOU!!

Daily-Blessing
Silent Night
http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch21.htm

What Shall I give him?
http://www.daily-blessings.com/ch62.htm

Hundred's of you have taken advantage of the free download available for the
Work From Home folks.  If you haven't checked it out yet...you should!!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/cjworkfromhome.htm

your printer is running...and you WILL need ink!!!  check out the great
prices at MrInkman!!  I sure use more ink than I like to think about, and
these folks keep me stocked up.  They are reliable, honest,and best of all
least expensive!!  check em out
http://www.daily-blessings.com/inkman.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


The second phase of reconstruction on IH 45 between W. Dallas and Memorial
will begin Saturday, November 11, 2000, all northbound lanes will be closed
at 7 PM.  All northbound traffic will detour to US 59 North to IH-610 Loop.
Two northbound lanes will reopen Monday, November 13, 2000, at 5 AM.

  The Houston Avenue / Memorial Avenue exit and the entrance from Pease,
  St. Joseph's Parkway, and Walker  will be closed until further notice.
Anyone
  typically using these routes must find an alternate route.

The following routes are recommended by the Texas Department of Transportation

New Ramp Chartres at Runnels to IH 10 West

Louisiana North to IH 10 West on ramp

Allen Parkway to Studemont or Waugh to IH 10

West Gray to Montrose North (Studemont) to IH 10

Bagby (W. Dallas) to Montrose North (Studemont) to IH 10

San Jacinto to IH 10 East

North on main to IH 45

Travis to IH 45

The Downtown District is updating it's web site with detailed road closure
maps and suggested alternate routes.  This information is available at
http://www.downtownstreets.com. Please check this site regularly for updates
on street closures.


FYI - Enron isn't already in the queue.

To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jay_dudley@pgn.com
Subject: Re: Draft interconnection procedure

Comments:

2.3     Delete last sentence.  If Enron is already in the queue (or
considered in a queue) before a TP's interconnection procedures are filed at
FERC, we don't want to have to resubmit something within 15 days in order to
remain in the queue.  I don't think this is necessary and all are protected
because pre-existing requests will be posted on OASIS on the queue.

4.3   Enron has argued for 60 days consistent with the OATT times (lost
unfortunately).  It may look odd for PGE to ask for 90 days.  PGE is
protected because if it legitimately takes longer than 60 days, you send a
notification.

6    ((I realize that this language was included in CP&L, but recommend these
changes for PGE.)

 6.1  Add after "as modified by the Commission" "if Customer chooses to
commence construction."
6.2   Modify last sentence -- The Agreement will provide milestones toward
placing the generator in service that the Interconnection Customer must make
reasonable progress toward or it will lose its queue priority (after
notification and opportunity to remedy.)

Thanks.

Mary Hain
03/13/2001 12:10 PM
To: Christi Nicolay
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jay_dudley@pgn.com

Subject: Draft interconnection procedure

Since EPMI doesn't have any PGE interconnection requests pending, Jay Dudley
agreed to allow us to review PGE's draft FERC interconnection filing.  As I
mentioned to you on Friday, PGE is trying to file this week so we have a
quick turn around time.  I'm going to try to read it today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 10:09 AM
---------------------------
From: JAY DUDLEY/ENRON@enronxgate on 03/12/2001 07:39 PM CST
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank Afranji/ENRON@enronxgate, MICHELE FARRELL/ENRON@enronxgate
Subject: Draft interconnection procedure

Mary - here is a draft of what the PGE interconnection procedure will be.
As I said, much of this is from VEPCO and Carolina Power.

Michele is redrafting it to be compatible with our OATT.

Let me know your comments as we want to file with FERC this week.

Thanks.

Jay.


New years i am on call at the hospital, i will be bringing in the new year
with some hot nurse,  i hope.

As for the final four, two to four whatever is manageable.  huge iou if you
can hook me up with tics!!!!  Thanks for the help!!

where are you and the wife headed for the new year celebration?

From: "Benjamin Rogers" <brogers2@ect.enron.com>
To: "D.Michael Gioffre, DDS" <dgioffre@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re:
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 09:54:36 -0600

Hey Mike,
Thanks for the pics.  Where were the ones from which  looks to be a wedding?
Hey, how many tickets were you thinking about? Were you thinking two for you
and
your Dad?  That weekend is April 1 & 3, 2000.  I'm not sure whether that is
Easter weekend or not.  One other way to get tics is to go to
www.finalfourseats.com  Let me know your situation.  Where are you spending
the
New Year?  Talk to you later.
Ben

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


Chris,  Attached is the document to which Russell and I have agreed.  Next step is for us to get signed and fax to Russell.  Do you have the tract descriptions that Gulf forwarded?  Does Dave?


Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041611.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  50.00 / Final:  49.99)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SOUTH
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
+++ Hour 11 - bad data from ISO.
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


FYI.  Seems to be moving toward a Florida-only RTO; however, with (i) MISO and PJM in discussions about one market design; (ii) SPP in MISO; and (iii) PJM bidding to be SE Trans operator (with LMP-financial rights), Florida may have to play similarly.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Montovano, Steve
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:42 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	FW: Florida RTO

FYI - Free information from Fla.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bill Bryant <BBryant@katzlaw.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:04 AM
To:	Steve Montavano (E-mail); Steve Montavano (E-mail 2)
Subject:	Florida RTO

Bernie,

Steve,

	In the FPSC's ongoing investigation into whether it is prudent for
Florida IOUs to form a RTO and into the costs associated with a RTO, it
issued an order last week finding that the IOUs' proactive formation of
GridFlorida in response to Order No. 2000 is prudent.  It said, however,
that it did not find certain aspects of the GridFlorida proposal to be in
the best interests of Florida's retail ratepayers.

Of particular concern to the FPSC is the transfer of ownership of
transmission assets that the current GridFlorida proposal contemplates.  The
FPSC said it believes that "the benefits associated with the transco
structure of GridFlorida can be achieved under an ISO structure, in which
participants would continue to own their transmission assets while the RTO
would have operational control over those assets. ... The record indicates
that the potential for customer benefits is just as likely under an ISO
structure as the transco structure proposed for GridFlorida. ... While we
appreciate the merits of transferring ownership of transmission assets to
GridFlorida, we believe that a more cautious, transitional approach is
prudent for Peninsular Florida at this time."

The FPSC is satisfied with either a for-profit or not-for-profit ISO.

The FPSC asked that the IOUs modify the GridFlorida proposal consistent with
the terms of the FPSC order and file the modified proposal within 90 days of
the December 20, 2001 order.

Let me know if you need further information.  We can scan the order into an
Acrobat file and e-mail it to you, if you like.

Bill


Angela,

As discussed, the following file contains hisoricals for PGE.  Chris should
have deleted data in the database from the middle of March back so you can
import anytime.  This data goes up to 2/6/01 and Chris will reload from
2/7/01 to present.  Thanks.

Mat


My pleasure. Sounds like he's got a big job---glad that Enron can help....

Riccardo Bortolotti@ECT
09/04/2000 03:33 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Contact with Prominent UC Berkeley Energy Economist

Jeff,

thanks a lot for exceeding expectations .

Regards,

         R

Jeff Dasovich@EES
31/08/2000 16:49
To: fgobbo@luiss.it, Riccardo Bortolotti/LON/ECT@ECT,
borenste@haas.berkeley.edu
cc:

Subject: Contact with Prominent UC Berkeley Energy Economist

Greetings Dr. Gobbo:

If my memory serves, you should have arrived back in Italy, or will return
soon.  Since we met, I have spoken with Severin Borenstein, who is intimately
involved with California's electricity restructuring (melodrama?) and a
renowned energy economist  at UC Berkeley.  Severin has offered to serve as a
contact for you as you continue to take on the formidable task of
restructuring your country's electric industry.  I've included his contact
information below.  And, of course, if there is ever anything I can do for
you, do not hesitate to contact me.

All the best,
Jeff

Severin Borenstein

E.T. Grether Professor of Business
  Administration and Public Policy   Director
Haas School of Business              U.C. Energy Institute
University of California             2539 Channing Way
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900              Berkeley, CA 94720-5180
(p) 510-642-3689                     (p) 510-642-5145
(f) 707-885-2508                     http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei

Email: borenste@haas.berkeley.edu
WWW: http://haas.berkeley.edu/~borenste


FYI -- As a result of a discussion that I had earlier in the week with
Georgeanne...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99 11:31 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Georgeanne Hodges                           12/30/99 09:09 AM

To: Sally Beck@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meetings with Commercial Teams

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT on 12/30/99
09:08 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Faith Killen                           12/29/99 06:39 PM

To: Paula Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Nicholie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meetings with Commercial Teams

Effective immediately, please invite your Energy Ops team representatives to
all future meetings with the Commercial teams.

Gas- Brent Price
Power- Kristin Albrecht
Emerging Ops- Scott Pleus
IR/FX/Equity- Sheila Glover
Paper- Jeff Harbert

In addition to communicating the purpose of the meeting, please deliver via
e-mail  the information to be reviewed prior to the meeting. This will enable
the Energy Ops representative to raise any concerns/issues he/she might have
prior to meeting with the commercial leads, and give us an opportunity to
address these in advance. Thanks.


ISC - Customer Service Survey Ticket#HD0000000705941, Password Reset

: Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Customer Service Survey.
Your input is crucial to our continued efforts in establishing and providing you with World Class Support.

Please take a minute and complete the 5 question survey then submit it back to us when you are done.

Once again, thank you for your participation.

ISC Customer Care Group

http://rc.enron.com/survey/survey_1.asp?id=000000000005540


need to review this default notice (please ask Jarrett or Blake)

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490


No sweat.  Not a problem.  Summary will do fine.  Let's definitely try to
coordinate for the next meeting.  You have a great weekend, too.

Best,
Jeff

	Lara Leibman
	10/20/2000 04:20 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 Subject: Re: Tax, Legal, Regulatory and Accounting Meeting

Jeff,

Unfortunately, we have to keep the date as scheduled.  I am very sorry.
Hopefully, the next meeting will work better for your schedule and we will
have a better opportunity to give our preferences for dates.  This time
round, tax sort of took the lead.  Also, I promise to provide a summary
afterwards.

Hope you have a great weekend.

Lara

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/20/2000 11:34 AM

		 To: Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue
Nord/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Tax, Legal, Regulatory and Accounting Meeting

Good idea.  Unfortunately, I'll be sitting in an office in S.D. with Sempra
execs.  My apologies.  But since this is likely to be ongoing, preference
would be to participate in the "first" meeting.

	Lara Leibman
	10/20/2000 11:14 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 Subject: Re: Tax, Legal, Regulatory and Accounting Meeting

Jeff,

Could you possibly call in? We could arrange for a dial-in number in that
case.  I know that we arranged that date with tax bc/Sue is coming in that
day and they had cleared that date with some of the accounting or legal folks
already.  Please let me know.  Thanks.

Lara

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/20/2000 10:05 AM

		 To: Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Tax, Legal, Regulatory and Accounting Meeting

Lara:
I would very much like to attend but have a meeting scheduled that day with
Chris Calger (ENA) and the CEO and CFO of Sempra Energy (we're trying to do a
deal with them).   That's a date that I can't change.  I can meet on Nov.
3rd, or Nov. 7-9.  Hope it's possible to re-arrange

Best,
Jeff

	Lara Leibman
	10/20/2000 07:41 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 Subject: Tax, Legal, Regulatory and Accounting Meeting

Jeff and Mike,

Our first meeting has been scheduled to take place on November 2nd.  The
meeting will probably last half a day and will begin around 1pm.  Please let
me if you plan to attend.  Thanks and have a great weekend.

Regards,
Lara


It is my pleasure to announce Scott and Barbara Pleus as the proud parents of
a new baby girl, Catherine "Cati" Elizabeth, born Saturday, April 29, 2000,
at 8:25pm.  Cati weighed in at a bouncing 6 lbs. and 4 ounces and stretched
out to 20 inches in length!

Due to the new arrival, Scott Pleus will be out of the office all of this
week.  If there are any meetings or appointments that needs Scott's immediate
attention, please contact me at (713) 853-3540.   In addition, Scott will be
checking into the office regularly, and can be reached at home during day
hours.

Again, please join me in saying "Congratulations!" to the Pleus family on
their new arrival.

Thank you,

Inga Latson

Scott Pleus
Office#  (713) 853-6577
Home# (281) 261-0499
Pager# (713) 761-4808
Cellular# (281) 300-8286


Stinson ,Vince ,Zimin,

Here's a brief document on constraints on the shape of a smile for a fixed
expiry date.
the constraints are neccessary and sufficient for no arbitrage in this case.
I've used a template created by Dr. Leppard which is why it looks so scary.

If you need constraints in the time direction then I will have to think a
little bit more about it.
I think constraints in this direction are very model depenendent e.g.
stochastic volatility and local volatility models
will throw up different constraints.

Steve,
I am not sure if our traders (or quants for that matter) are aware of these
constraints
and some desks are beginning to build smiles...

Regards
Sharad


FYI.  EPSA looks interested in undertaking a cost-benefit analysis.  As soon as I hear more, I'll give everyone the info.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 10:44 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Subject:	Conference Call on Tuesday

Jim,
Julie wants to hold a conference call on Tuesday, October 30th to discuss the possibility of designing and undertaking cost-benefit analyses to support FERC's RTO policies.  She wants to have you on the call & would like to know when you would be available.  Anytime after 1:00 p.m. EST would probably be best for her.  If you could let me know ASAP I will be able to send out an email to those she thinks should be on the call.  Thanks, Jim.

Jackie Gallagher


FYI.
Thanks.
Gary

 confidentiality.agrmt.4.12.01.pdf
 <<confidentiality.agrmt.4.12.01.pdf>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - confidentiality.agrmt.4.12.01.pdf


it wasnt at the top of my to do list

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 9:16 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

you didn't tell me that becky got engaged.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Quinn, Kristin
Sent:	Wednesday, July 18, 2001 8:13 AM
To:	Woods, Trevor
Subject:	RE: Files

Just let me know if/when you'd like me go through some of the files with you.  My schedule is pretty flexible this week.
Kristin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Woods, Trevor
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 5:59 PM
To:	Quinn, Kristin
Subject:	RE: Files

Thanks,
I'm gonna shoot this to Raj, look at it myself and then give you a buzz.  Thanks and I hope the new group is going well.
Trevor

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quinn, Kristin
Sent:	Sunday, July 15, 2001 2:55 PM
To:	Woods, Trevor
Cc:	Affelt, Scott
Subject:	Files

Trevor - Here is a list of Excel files that I have created that you might find useful.  If you do not have access to the "CES" folder on the O: drive, please ask Scott to approve access for you.  All files are under O:/CES/....

	1.) Kristin Quinn/CES/NOx Controls Forecast
	2.) Kristin Quinn/CES/NOx Sources Allowed Table
	3.) Kristin Quinn/Emissions Project/Utility Fax Alerts - I put this table together for Adam; it lists all SCR announcements made on the McIlvaine website
	4.) Kristin Quinn/allplantsdata - spreadsheet and chart of all coal-fired power plants that fall under the NOx SIP Call
	5.) Kristin Quinn/Compliance Costs for 4 units
	6.) Kristin Quinn/fakeplantsdata - gives capital and O&M costs for power plants with varying MWs and NOx rates
	7.) NOx Costs/NOx Costs 92900
	8.) Marketing Files/Templates/Client Basecase - model used for Client's traditional compliance plan
	9.) Marketing Files/Templates/NOxTech Basecase - model for Client's system using NOxTech
	10.) NOx and SO2 Data/CUECost/CUECost3 - spreadsheet put out by the EPA for a variety of APC tecnologies; the User's Manual is on my desk

Please let me know if you have any more questions.  I hope this helps!
Kristin


i'm not a big prince fan - she might want to though

Brian Hoskins@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/17/2000 09:12 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Keneally's

sure.

do you and Shanna want to go to the Prince concert?  Tickets go on sale
tomorrow.

Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

	Eric Bass@ECT
	11/17/00 08:30 AM

		 To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Matthew
Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Luis Mena/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa
Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Keneally's

Anyone up for Keneally's after work today?


Here's what those of us in San Francisco read Sunday morning, as the lead
story in the SF Chronicle:

> Soaring Electric Use More Fiction Than Fact
> Chronicle investigation finds power companies manipulate data to excuse
> their towering rates
> Christian Berthelsen, Scott Winokur, Chronicle Staff Writers
> <mailto:cberthelsen@sfchronicle.com>
> Sunday, March 11, 2001
> ,2001 San Francisco Chronicle </chronicle/info/copyright>
> URL:
> <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03
> /11/MN213155.DTL>
>
> Power companies say it so often, and with such certainty, that it has
> become a virtual mantra: "Skyrocketing" energy use by Californians is a
> root cause of the state's power crisis, and justification for surging
> electricity prices.
> But a computer analysis of electricity usage data by The Chronicle reveals
> that the mantra is a myth -- that overall growth in electricity demand
> hasn't been nearly as great as the industry portrays it.
> The industry has painted the summer of 2000 as the equivalent of a
> 100-year storm in meteorology -- an event so powerful and unexpected that
> the existing infrastructure was devastated by its force.
> The statistics show that 2000, taken in total, was nothing of the sort.
> Moreover, two independent state agencies' assessments of California's
> power plant capacity appear to show that the growth should have been
> easily accommodated.
> The companies have defended their practice of increasingly taking power-
> generation plants out of service by arguing that heavy demand and
> consequent plant usage necessitated major, time-consuming repairs.
> "The claims that demand growth is rampant and that it was totally
> unexpected and due to the Internet economy, to Silicon Valley, or server
> farms,
> or people recharging cell phones -- that's bogus," said Tom Kelly,
> assistant executive director of the California Energy Commission. "About
> as bogus as you can get."
> The Chronicle's findings are based on data collected by the California
> Independent System Operator, a manager of the state's electricity grid.
> They show:
> -- Total electricity consumption in California increased only 4.75 percent
> in 2000 from 1999, a sharp contrast to claims of industry representatives,
> who have repeatedly relied on isolated, loose or selective comparisons
> that make growth appear as high as 20 percent. In fact, the single
> greatest hour of electricity usage in 2000 was actually lower than any
> peak demand period in 1999 or 1998.
> -- Average peak demand -- the average of the highest hour of electricity
> usage for each day -- increased only 4.79 percent from 1999 to 2000. Even
> during the months of May to September in 2000, when the greatest spikes in
> electricity usage occur, demand growth was only 8.31 percent higher than
> the same period the year before.
> -- More than 30 days of critical power shortage warnings, so-called Stage
> 3 emergencies, and two days of blackouts this year occurred at times of
> moderate energy use -- levels often below those at which neither warnings
> nor blackouts have occurred in the past.
> The findings appear to buttress suspicions that the "skyrocketing demand"
> explanation for rising energy prices is a cover for what is really
> happening --
> that power companies have simply started charging more for an essential
> commodity, regardless of whether it is in short supply.
> Presented with The Chronicle's findings, Gary Ackerman, a representative
> for the Western Power Trading Forum, a trade group representing power
> companies, said the calculations support the industry position that
> electricity demand is growing strong.
> "That's pretty healthy growth for California as opposed to the long-term
> historical average, which is close to 2 percent," he said. "To me, that's
> really strong growth."
> Energy demand is certainly on the rise in California -- growth of more
> than 4 percent is still double what was projected -- and the state has
> obviously fallen behind in building power plants.
> Even though a recent study found California ranked 47th out of the 50
> states in per-capita energy consumption, the surging demand explanation
> has become so accepted that leading officials accept it as gospel. Gov.
> Gray Davis has made energy conservation -- 10 percent, at that -- a
> centerpiece of his efforts to solve the crisis.
> "Energy use is growing," said state Sen. John Burton, D-San Francisco,
> citing the growth of Silicon Valley and high-tech operations statewide.
> "There's been tremendous growth, whether manufacturing or high tech --
> cell phones, faxes, whatever. The stuff is growing."
> Yet the energy industry has been steadfast in its insistence that the
> consumer is largely to blame. In testimony and submissions to government
> bodies considering prescriptions for the crisis, energy demand growth has
> consistently been overstated.
> Joe Bob Perkins, the chief operating officer of Houston-based Reliant
> Energy Inc., told the U.S. Senate in January that California's growing
> economy and high summer temperatures caused electricity use to "surge
> dramatically" -- a demand growth of 13 percent.
> Richard Wheatley, a spokesman for Reliant, said Perkins' testimony was
> based on estimates by the federal Energy Information Administration of
> monthly retail electricity sales.
> "We do stand by that," Wheatley said. "Unfortunately, it does not track
> with ISO data."
> The industry-backed Edison Electric Institute said in a report that
> electricity demand grew by anywhere from 5 percent to 21 percent during
> the spring of 2000, compared with the same period a year earlier.
> Russell Tucker, an economist for the institute, said the group's figures
> were derived by identifying the single highest hour of electricity demand
> for each spring month of 1999 and 2000 and comparing them, finding the May
> peak rose 21 percent.
> Granted, the state Energy Commission uses the same model to determine
> whether California has enough plant capacity to meet demand. But the
> presentation makes it appear that overall demand, not just the absolute
> peak, is growing by 21 percent. When the peak of each day is averaged and
> compared from year to year, May's figure was much lower: 12.79 percent.
> Also, nowhere did Edison's report note that the peak hour of 2000, a load
> of 43,784 megawatts on Aug. 16, was actually lower than the peak hours of
> either of the previous two years -- 45,884 on July 12, 1999, or 44,406 on
> Sept.
> 1, 1998.
> The Chronicle analysis of average peak demand showed that no month last
> year grew more than June's 15.34 percent, though no blackouts occurred in
> that month. May and June were the only months when demand growth exceeded
> 10 percent, the analysis showed. Most months recorded 4 percent or 5
> percent, and some -- such as September -- were less than 3 percent.
> Two months, October and December, had demand levels lower than the year
> before -- 4.22 percent less for October, 1.46 percent lower for December.
> Mike Florio, a consumer lawyer and board member of the ISO, said that even
> growth of less than 5 percent from 1999 to 2000 would seem overstated,
> since 1999 was a relatively mild weather year and 2000 was a much hotter
> one. "You are quite right," Florio said. " 'Skyrocketing' demand is a
> myth."
> MARKET MANIPULATION?
> Consumer representatives and some politicians have long suspected that,
> rather than dire imbalances between supply and demand, market manipulation
> is behind the crisis.
> Generators and power marketers adamantly deny this, saying they have done
> everything they could to keep the lights on. They say they ran aging,
> decrepit plants at higher-than-normal levels last summer to accommodate
> what they described as unprecedented demand. They also say that, at great
> expense, they delayed much-needed maintenance in order to keep the power
> flowing.
> Their claims have received some support from the Federal Energy Regulatory
> Commission, which said in a report last month that it found no evidence
> power companies were using maintenance schedules to manipulate supply. The
> report, however, was heavily qualified by the FERC, which said it did not
> investigate other forms of manipulation. Moreover, the agency acknowledged
> that the bulk of its investigation was conducted by simply calling power
> plants and questioning them over the telephone.
> The supply side of the energy equation is harder to penetrate, in part
> because supply data are confidential. Thus, the question of how blackouts
> could have occurred at such low levels of demand in January is hard to
> answer. What is clear is that, at times, during the crisis this year, as
> much as 12, 000 megawatts of electricity supply have been unavailable for
> use, mostly because of unplanned plant outages -- about four times the
> level anticipated by the ISO.
> Power companies say the old plants they bought were not capable of
> producing to the levels sketched out by the ISO and the Energy Commission,
> and that everything from low water conditions, emissions limitations and
> high temperatures last year caused less energy to be available than was
> anticipated.
> But others suggest that what began as a shortage caused by a withholding
> of supply to drive up price has turned into one caused by withholdings out
> of fear of not being paid.
> What did go up, unquestionably, were wholesale electricity prices.
> While average electricity usage during the heaviest hours last year
> increased by less than 5 percent, prices charged by power companies to the
> utilities that deliver juice to consumers increased more than 289 percent.
>
> In June, the cost of a megawatt hour increased more than fivefold, going
> from the 1999 level of $30.53 to $170.60. In October, prices doubled over
> the same period a year earlier, going from $53.47 to $111.04. And in
> December -- despite a 1.46 percent decline in electricity usage from the
> previous December -- peak wholesale electricity prices hit $425.59. They'd
> been $31.88 one year before.
> Then the pace of price increases began to accelerate within the last six
> months of 2000. Overall, average peak usage during December was about
> 31,200 megawatts, about a fifth lower than it was in August. Average
> prices in December? They just about doubled, to $425 a megawatt hour.
> The companies' explanation for rising prices despite falling demand was
> that more and more plants had to be taken offline for repairs, decreasing
> supply. Even given the high number of inoperable plants, questions remain
> about why the existing supply could not cover demand.
> On the blackout days of Jan. 17 and 18 fewer plants were offline -- and
> more electricity was available -- than on days when the state managed to
> squeeze by without turning out the lights.
> Even today, with Stage 3 alerts having faded away, at least temporarily,
> demand levels remain more or less the same as when California was in a
> constant state of emergency. Moreover, the lists of offline plants are as
> long as ever.
> AMPLE POWER SHOULD EXIST
> The Energy Commission and the ISO have concluded that California's power
> plants are capable of generating more than 45,000 megawatts of
> electricity. That means that even with plant repair outages, low water
> levels decreasing hydraulic generation, air-pollution rules and other
> environmental constraints, the power companies should be able to
> accommodate all but the most extreme spikes in demand.
> According to industry data obtained by The Chronicle, the Western Systems
> Coordinating Council, a government-backed trade group in Salt Lake City,
> concluded California would have considerable surpluses throughout 2000,
> including margins as high as 39 percent in December, based on data
> provided to it by the ISO. Even under low water conditions, the ISO
> reported, the state would have total power resources of 47,532 megawatts
> in that month. Yet unplanned outages were far higher, and the system began
> to crash that month and into this year, at far lower levels of demand.
> "Clearly," Florio said, "we should not be having a shortage at 2 a.m. on
> Christmas Eve, when the only person awake is Santa Claus."
>
>
>
>
>
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or
attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any
review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express
permission is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete all copies.


Ok, by now you think I've lost my mind. I can accept that.

I believe this is the most current version which should form the basis of the
Salmon LLC contract (formerly known as LV Co Gen facility agreement).

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/16/2001 05:12
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 03/12/2001 04:17:06 PM
To: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com, Bill.Williams@enron.com, Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: tconstan@llgm.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com

Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II pr
oject

Bill/Dale/Kay-

I've made redline edits with regards to LVCII performance guarantee values
in Section 10.7 for output and heat rate based on the Feb 8, 2001 guarantee
sheet.

Dale, please send revised LVC II facility agreement to reflect Units 25-28
with appropriate schedules for price, delivery, payment and termination
schedules at your earliest convenience.

The units 19-20 and 23-24 that are currently reflected in this document will
be left in E-Next (Turbopark).  The schedules for price, delivery, payment
will remain the same for these units.

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com [mailto:Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, SSEP); Bill.Williams@enron.com;
Kay.Mann@enron.com
Subject: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II
project

Bill Williams asked me to forward the attached execution form of the
LM-6000 purchase contract.

The second attachment is to be inserted as Exhibit H-2 in the contract.  I
understand that we received it from GE, and that it is available only in
pdf format.

Thanks.

(See attached file: Training LM6000.pdf)(See attached file: LV Cogen Gas
Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5.DOC)

 - LV Cogen Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5_redline031201.DOC


Status Report
Much of the first half of May was dedicated to organizing stakeholders and
lobbying for the passage of SB 28x (Sher), which was the Legislature first
attempt at siting reform and included several IEP-sponsored proposals.  SB
28x was the last bill to be signed by the Governor and chaptered into law
before the close of the first extraordinary session.  The final version
included:

? Conforming the timing of offsets for power plants to Clean Air Act
requirements.
? Substituting CEQA-style hearings for the trial-like proceedings of the
CEC.
? Streamlining the permit process for the modernization of existing power
plant sites.
? Giving consideration to the positive environmental impacts of a proposed
project.
? Improving the timeliness and coordination of state and local agency
review.
? Extending the current deadlines for the expedited review for "peaker"
plants and expanding the application to consider re-certification or
replacement.

There was also a small number of instances where Edson + Modisette assisted
on other issues at the request of IEP staff or IEP member companies.  As
always, Edson + Modisette is here if you need assistance on any other
issues.

Since SB 28x is only a first step in making changes to the siting process,
IEP member should now be thinking about what is next.  A list of IEP
proposals still on the table include:

? Permitting local agencies to make zoning changes or other decisions for
power plants contingent upon CEC CEQA Compliance
? Giving deference to other state and regional agencies
? Easing the threshold for override of local land use requirements.
? Making the ISO responsible for determining interconnection requirements

Assembly Member Calderon's office is currently reviewing these proposals in
conjunction with an effort to develop an environmental dispatch protocol.
IEP has weighed-in on this issue and has strongly advocated that 1)
reliability should always be the first priority; 2) protocol should be
limited to RMR units and out-of-market calls only; and, 3) any follow-up to
SB 28x should also consider IEP siting proposals left on the table.  I
circulated Asm. Calderon's proposed environmental dispatch language to IEP
members last Friday which targets those generating units running beyond
their air permits per the Governor's most recent executive order.  In the
short-term, I expect there will be additional stakeholders meetings on this
and other siting issues as Asm. Calderon decides how to proceed and in what
legislative vehicle.

All this action on the Assembly side does not rule out Senator Sher's part
on the siting issue.  Since SB 28x moved to the Governor's desk, Sen. Sher
has ensured us and others that that was only the first step and he would
like to continue pursuing additional siting reforms during this legislative
session.  SB 28xx in the second extraordinary session is currently a spot
bill ready to take up that cause.  There are pros and cons for either author
to move forward on siting reform, but I would recommend for the time being
that IEP let Asm. Calderon and Sen. Sher work out their turf wars while IEP
shares its proposals with both.

There are also other siting bills with the potential to move forward.  SB
86xx (Peace/Burton) was introduced last week which would require a developer
to begin construction on a project within 6 months of receiving
certification from CEC or lose its permit, and introduces the newly created
California Consumer Power and Financing Authority into the siting process.
Senator Morrow has called stakeholders together this week to provide input
on SB 76xx which is currently in spot bill format.  Asm. Wright still has
his siting vehicle, AB 48xx, poised to move if needed; and Sen. Battin has
several siting bills introduced also if needed.

I have mentioned this before, but it is worth repeating.  With the interest
in siting issues in the Capitol having waned only slightly, IEP members may
want to consider meeting again to develop a second list of proposed siting
reforms (in addition to the above issues left over from the first list).
Such a list should take into account the Governor's Executive Orders and
possibly what generators would be willing to give up to the enviros in
exchange for "big ticket" reforms.

Please call if you have any questions about the above invoice or any of the
siting issues pending before the Legislature.

Sincerely,

JULEE MALINOWSKI-BALL
Senior Associate

Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modisette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
jmball@ns.net